[Bug 169345] Review Request: SEC - Simple Event Correlator

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Wed Jun 14 06:57:33 UTC 2006


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: SEC - Simple Event Correlator


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=169345


j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl        |lists at forevermore.net
OtherBugsDependingO|177841                      |
              nThis|                            |




------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl  2006-06-14 02:49 EST -------
Unfortunatly many comments were lost here due to the BZ crash. Summarising:

-Chris Petersen <lists forevermore net> needs this for his work so he posted a 
 much improved spec and srpm (Chris can you repost a link to these please).
-I responded that that was very nice of him and that I understand he wanted some
 progress because he needed this for his work, but that this wasn't helping in
 getting Didier sponsored as Didier himself must show that he is able to create
 proper specs.
-Some friendly discussion
-End result, Didier was only interested (for now) in getting SEC into FE, Chris
 is going to get it into FE since he needs it to work and Didier well submit
 a new package review request with the FE_NEEDSPONSOR flag if / when he wants to
 contribute something else.

As such I'm removing the FE_NEEDSPONSOR blocker since this is now a regular
review (with Chris being the review submitter).

Chris repeating myself: please repost the link to your latest SRPM and spec.




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list