[Bug 177580] Review Request: lat (LDAP Administration Tool)

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Wed Jun 14 13:36:25 UTC 2006


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: lat  (LDAP Administration Tool)


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177580


paul at city-fan.org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
         AssignedTo|gdk at redhat.com              |j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl
  BugsThisDependsOn|                            |193957
OtherBugsDependingO|163776                      |163778
              nThis|                            |




------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org  2006-06-14 09:28 EST -------
(recovering from bugzilla crash)

New spec, SRPM, and FC5 i386 RPM available here:
http://www.city-fan.org/~paul/extras/lat/

* Mon Jun 12 2006 Paul Howarth <paul at city-fan.org> - 1.0.5-2
- Spec file cleanups (#177580)
-   No need to use update-desktop-database (no MIME type in desktop file)
-   No need to remove .la files (artefact from old package)
-   Own directories %{_datadir}/gnome/ %{_datadir}/gnome/help/ %{_datadir}/omf/
-   Put icon in %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor/22x22/apps directory rather than
    %{_datadir}/pixmaps, and update icon cache post-install/removal
-   Add doc files AUTHORS ChangeLog COPYING* README TODO
- Add missing buildreq gettext
- Remove redundant MONO_SHARED_DIR assignments in %%build and %%install
- Don't redefine %%{_libdir}, it's not needed
- Prevent creation of debuginfo package, which would be empty for a mono app

I've added a dependency for this bug of Bug #193957 (nant), where mono packaging
guidelines are being discussed.


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list