[Bug 195401] Review Request: osgcal - Adapts OpenSceneGraph to use Cal3D
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Fri Jun 16 08:27:01 UTC 2006
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: osgcal - Adapts OpenSceneGraph to use Cal3D
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195401
------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-06-16 04:19 EST -------
Review for this package:-
MUST Items:
- MUST: rpmlint shows no error
- MUST: The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
- MUST: The spec file name matching the base package osgcal, in the format
osgcal.spec
- MUST: This package meets the Packaging Guidelines.
- MUST: The package is licensed with an open-source compatible license LGPL.
- MUST: The License field in the package osgcal.spec file matches the
actual license file LGPL in tarball.
- MUST: The sources used to build the package matches the upstream source,
as provided in the spec URL. md5sum is correct.
- MUST: This package owns all directories that it creates.
- MUST: This package did not contain any duplicate files in the %files
listing.
- MUST: This package have a %clean section, which contains %{__rm} -rf
%{buildroot}.
- MUST: This package contains shared library files located in the dynamic
linker's default paths, therefore this package is calling ldconfig in %post and
%postun.
- MUST: This package used macros.
- MUST: Document files are included like README.
- MUST: This pcakge contains devel package also, devel package requires
the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} =
%{version}-%{release}
- MUST: This Package did contained any .la libtool archives
- MUST: libraries are included in a -devel package.
- MUST: Files used by pkgconfig (.pc files) are in a -devel package.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
More information about the Fedora-package-review
mailing list