[Bug 194563] Review Request: conman - the console manager

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: conman - the console manager


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194563


panemade at gmail.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
                 CC|                            |panemade at gmail.com
OtherBugsDependingO|163776                      |163778
              nThis|                            |




------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com  2006-06-18 08:21 EST -------
Review for this package:-
MUST Items:
     - MUST: rpmlint shows no error 
     - MUST: The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
     - MUST: The spec file name matching the base package conman, in the format
conman.spec
      - MUST: This package meets the Packaging Guidelines.
      - MUST: The package is licensed with an open-source compatible license GPL.
      - MUST: The License field in the package conman.spec file is included in
tarball as COPYING.
      - MUST: The sources used to build the package matches the upstream source,
as provided in the spec URL. md5sum is correct.
      - MUST: This package owns all directories that it creates. 
      - MUST: This package did not contain any duplicate files in the %files
listing.
      - MUST: This package  have a %clean section, which contains %{__rm} -rf
%{buildroot}.
      - MUST: This package used macros.
      - MUST: Document files are NOT included like README.
     Package installed correctly the conman service

SHOULD items:-
        Upstream package should add README file

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.