[Bug 193479] Review Request: xwrits

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Tue Jun 20 02:54:18 UTC 2006


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: xwrits


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193479





------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com  2006-06-19 22:46 EST -------
Sorry I didn't get to this review this weekend... 

Here's a review.

OK - Package name
OK - Spec file matches base package name.
OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines.
OK - License (GPL)
OK - License field in spec matches
OK - License file included in package
OK - Spec in American English
OK - Spec is legible.
OK - Sources match upstream md5sum:
d49fbcc02dc09d1586281f3b294245da  xwrits-2.22.tar.gz
d49fbcc02dc09d1586281f3b294245da  xwrits-2.22.tar.gz.1
OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch.
n/a - Package needs ExcludeArch
OK - BuildRequires correct
n/a - Spec handles locales/find_lang
n/a - Spec has needed ldconfig in post and postun
n/a - Package is relocatable and has a reason to be.
OK - Package owns all the directories it creates.
OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files.
See below - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good.
OK - Package has a correct %clean section.
OK - Spec has consistant macro usage.
OK - Package is code or permissible content.
n/a - -doc subpackage needed/used.
OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime.
n/a - Headers/static libs in -devel subpackage.
n/a - .pc files in -devel subpackage.
n/a - .so files in -devel subpackage.
n/a - -devel package Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release}
n/a - .la files are removed.
OK - Package is a GUI app and has a .desktop file
OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own.
See Below - No rpmlint output.

Issues:

1. Some rpmlint output:

W: xwrits no-version-in-last-changelog

Suggest: add "2.22-2" to the end of the
* Sun May 28 2006 Jeff Layton <jlayton at redhat.com>
line.

E: xwrits non-standard-dir-perm /usr/share/doc/xwrits-2.22 0644

Suggest: don't set a default perm in files...
%defattr(0644,root,root)

should be just

%defattr(-,root,root)

W: xwrits non-standard-dir-in-usr man

Suggest: Don't specify full path for man page:

/usr/man/man1/xwrits.1*

should be:

%{_mandir}/man1/*

W: xwrits empty-%post

Suggest: remove empty %post section?

E: xwrits configure-without-libdir-spec

Suggest: add '--libdir=${_libdir}' to the configure step.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list