[Bug 192884] Review Request: poedit - GUI editor for GNU gettext .po files
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Tue Jun 20 06:59:20 UTC 2006
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: poedit - GUI editor for GNU gettext .po files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192884
kevin at tummy.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |kevin at tummy.com
OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163779
nThis| |
------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-06-20 02:51 EST -------
OK - Package name
OK - Spec file matches base package name.
OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines.
OK - License (MIT)
OK - License field in spec matches
OK - License file included in package
OK - Spec in American English
OK - Spec is legible.
OK - Sources match upstream md5sum:
e76a84ae4be4ad9d9a176fd8a1a2effb poedit-1.3.4.tar.gz
e76a84ae4be4ad9d9a176fd8a1a2effb poedit-1.3.4.tar.gz.1
OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch.
n/a - Package needs ExcludeArch
OK - BuildRequires correct
OK - Spec handles locales/find_lang
n/a - Spec has needed ldconfig in post and postun
n/a - Package is relocatable and has a reason to be.
OK - Package owns all the directories it creates.
OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files.
OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good.
OK - Package has a correct %clean section.
OK - Spec has consistant macro usage.
OK - Package is code or permissible content.
n/a - -doc subpackage needed/used.
OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime.
n/a - Headers/static libs in -devel subpackage.
n/a - .pc files in -devel subpackage.
n/a - .so files in -devel subpackage.
n/a - -devel package Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release}
n/a - .la files are removed.
OK - Package is a GUI app and has a .desktop file
OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own.
See below - No rpmlint output.
Issues:
1. Some rpmlint output:
Not sure if it's worth fixing these with sed/dos2unix/perl or just
reporting it upstream:
W: poedit wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/poedit-1.3.4/en/gettext.hhp
W: poedit wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/poedit-1.3.4/en/gettext.hhc
W: poedit wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/poedit-1.3.4/en/poedit.hhc
W: poedit wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/poedit-1.3.4/en/poedit.hhp
These are likely locales that rpmlint doesn't know about/are nonstandard?
E: poedit incorrect-locale-subdir /usr/share/locale/ast/LC_MESSAGES/poedit.mo
E: poedit incorrect-locale-subdir /usr/share/locale/fur/LC_MESSAGES/poedit.mo
2. I did a mock build for fc5 and that worked fine. Given the above comments
I also did a rpmbuild --rebuild on both a fc5 and devel machine and those
both worked just fine as well, everything seems to build as expected in both
mock/non mock env's.
3. There are lots of warnings when building, like:
/usr/include/wx-2.6/wx/clntdata.h:31: warning: dereferencing type-punned pointer
will break strict-aliasing rules
Might be worth reporting upstream.
None of the above are blockers, so this package is APPROVED.
remember to close this bug with NEXTRELEASE after it's imported and built.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
More information about the Fedora-package-review
mailing list