[Bug 175623] Review Request: yaz - Z39.50/SRW/SRU programs

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Wed Jun 21 04:11:09 UTC 2006


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: yaz - Z39.50/SRW/SRU programs


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175623


tibbs at math.uh.edu changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
         AssignedTo|gdk at redhat.com              |tibbs at math.uh.edu
OtherBugsDependingO|163776                      |163779
              nThis|                            |




------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu  2006-06-21 00:02 EST -------
Builds fine in mock (x86_64, development) and rpmlint is quiet.

* package meets naming and packaging guidelines.
* specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently.
* dist tag is present.
* build root is correct.
* license field matches the actual license.
* license is open source-compatible.  License text included in package.
* source files match upstream:
   2d401ea471a87e7a056ea2df9e2d9d14  yaz-2.1.22.tar.gz
* latest version is being packaged.
* BuildRequires are proper.
* package builds in mock (x86_64, development).
* rpmlint is silent.
* final provides and requires are sane:

  libyaz-2.1.22-1.fc6.x86_64.rpm
   libyaz.so.2()(64bit)
   libyazthread.so.2()(64bit)
   libyaz = 2.1.22-1.fc6
  =
   /sbin/ldconfig
   libcrypto.so.6()(64bit)
   libexslt.so.0()(64bit)
   libgcrypt.so.11()(64bit)
   libgpg-error.so.0()(64bit)
   libssl.so.6()(64bit)
   libwrap.so.0()(64bit)
   libxml2.so.2()(64bit)
   libxslt.so.1()(64bit)
   libyaz.so.2()(64bit)
   libyazthread.so.2()(64bit)
   libz.so.1()(64bit)

  libyaz-devel-2.1.22-1.fc6.x86_64.rpm
   libyaz-devel = 2.1.22-1.fc6
  =
   /bin/sh
   libxml2-devel
   libyaz = 2.1.22-1.fc6
   libyaz.so.2()(64bit)
   libyazthread.so.2()(64bit)
   openssl-devel
   readline-devel
   
  yaz-2.1.22-1.fc6.x86_64.rpm
   yaz = 2.1.22-1.fc6
  =
   libcrypto.so.6()(64bit)
   libexslt.so.0()(64bit)
   libgcrypt.so.11()(64bit)
   libgpg-error.so.0()(64bit)
   libhistory.so.5()(64bit)
   libncurses.so.5()(64bit)
   libreadline.so.5()(64bit)
   libssl.so.6()(64bit)
   libwrap.so.0()(64bit)
   libxml2.so.2()(64bit)
   libxslt.so.1()(64bit)
   libyaz.so.2()(64bit)
   libz.so.1()(64bit)

* shared libraries are present; ldconfig is called and unversioned .so files are
in the -devel package.
* package is not relocatable.
* owns the directories it creates.
* doesn't own any directories it shouldn't.
* no duplicates in %files.
* file permissions are appropriate.
* %clean is present.
* %check is present and all tests pass:
   ===================
   All 21 tests passed
   ===================
* scriptlets present and OK (ldconfig calls)
* code, not content.
* documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary.
* %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package.
* headers present in -devel package.
* no pkgconfig files.
* no libtool .la droppings.
* not a GUI app.

APPROVED

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list