[Bug 196101] Review Request: mimedefang

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Wed Jun 21 11:21:23 UTC 2006


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: mimedefang


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196101


paul at city-fan.org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |paul at city-fan.org




------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org  2006-06-21 07:13 EST -------
(In reply to comment #0)
> Unfortunately rpmlint isn't quiet on x86_32:
> E: mimedefang non-standard-uid /var/log/mimedefang defang
> E: mimedefang non-standard-gid /var/log/mimedefang defang
> E: mimedefang non-standard-dir-perm /var/log/mimedefang 0750
> E: mimedefang non-standard-uid /var/spool/MD-Quarantine defang
> E: mimedefang non-standard-gid /var/spool/MD-Quarantine defang
> E: mimedefang non-standard-dir-perm /var/spool/MD-Quarantine 0750
> E: mimedefang non-standard-uid /var/spool/MIMEDefang defang
> E: mimedefang non-standard-gid /var/spool/MIMEDefang defang
> E: mimedefang non-standard-dir-perm /var/spool/MIMEDefang 0750
> W: mimedefang service-default-enabled /etc/rc.d/init.d/mimedefang
> W: mimedefang incoherent-subsys /etc/rc.d/init.d/mimedefang $prog
> 
> IMHO all lines marked with error can't be really avoided, the first warning
line should be correct...when installing MIMEDefang, it should be enabled, too.
Last warning line seems to be caused by some rpmlint confusion ;-)

I would agree with you on all of these apart from the service-default-enabled
one. The system admin should be the one to enable a service if they want it, and
sendmail needs to be reconfigured manually to talk to it anyway.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list