[Bug 196176] Review Request: crystal
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Thu Jun 22 05:19:54 UTC 2006
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: crystal
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196176
panemade at gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |panemade at gmail.com
------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-06-22 01:11 EST -------
Not an official review as I'm not yet sponsored
Mock Built for i386 development is successfull with
cpio: crystal-1.0.0/client/<built-in>: No such file or directory
cpio: crystal-1.0.0/client/config/<built-in>: No such file or directory
MUST Items:
- MUST: rpmlint shows no error
- MUST: dist tag is present
- MUST: The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
- MUST: The spec file name matching the base package crystal, in the
format crystal.spec
- MUST: This package meets the Packaging Guidelines.
- MUST: The package is licensed with an open-source compatible license GPL.
- MUST: The License field in the package crystal.spec file matches the
actual license file COPYING in tarball.
- MUST: The sources used to build the package matches the upstream source,
as provided in the spec URL. md5sum is correct.
- MUST: This package owns all directories that it creates.
- MUST: This package did not contain any duplicate files in the %files
listing.
- MUST: This package have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT.
- MUST: This package used macros.
- MUST: Document files are included like INSTALL README.
- MUST: Package is calling ldconfig on postun post successfully.
* Source URL is present.
* BuildRoot is correct BuildRoot:
%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
* BuildRequires is correct
Not tested Desktop Icon but found its installed successfully.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
More information about the Fedora-package-review
mailing list