[Bug 196403] Review Request: perl-Calendar-Simple - Perl extension to create simple calendars
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Fri Jun 23 05:53:31 UTC 2006
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: perl-Calendar-Simple - Perl extension to create simple calendars
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196403
------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-06-23 01:45 EST -------
Not an official review as I'm not yet sponsored
Mock build for i386 development is successfull.
MUST Items:
- MUST: rpmlint shows no error
- MUST: dist tag is present
- MUST: The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
- MUST: The spec file name matching the base package perl-Calender-Simple,
in the format perl-Calender-Simple.spec
- MUST: This package meets the Packaging Guidelines.
- MUST: The package is licensed with an open-source compatible license GPL.
- MUST: The License field in the package perl-Calender-Simple.spec file
matches the actual license file COPYING in tarball.
- MUST: The sources used to build the package matches the upstream source,
as provided in the spec URL. md5sum is correct.
- MUST: This package owns all directories that it creates.
- MUST: This package did not contain any duplicate files in the %files
listing.
- MUST: This package have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT.
- MUST: This package used macros.
- MUST: Document files are included like README.
* Source URL is Not present.
I need to remove DA from URL. Working Source URL for me
http://search.cpan.org/CPAN/authors/id/D/DAVECROSS/Calendar-Simple-1.13.tar.gz
* BuildRoot is correct BuildRoot:
%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
* BuildRequires is correct
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
More information about the Fedora-package-review
mailing list