[Bug 193493] Review Request: iksemel - An XML parser library designed for Jabber applications

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Mon Jun 26 04:41:46 UTC 2006


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: iksemel - An XML parser library designed for Jabber applications


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193493


tibbs at math.uh.edu changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
         AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |tibbs at math.uh.edu
OtherBugsDependingO|163776                      |163778
              nThis|                            |




------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu  2006-06-26 00:33 EST -------
I noticed the following build failure:

+ aclocal
aclocal:configure.ac:14: warning: macro `AM_PROG_LIBTOOL' not found in library

which is solved by adding BuildRequires: libtool.  However, I'm not sure why you
think you need to rerun the autotools.  You can disable rpath just by using
make LIBTOOL=/usr/bin/libtool %{?_smp_mflags}
and then deleting the extra .a file that shows up.

Other than that, the package looks good and rpmlint is completely silent.  There
is, however, a test suite that you should call (with "make check") in a %check
section.

Review:
* package meets naming and packaging guidelines.
* specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently.
* dist tag is present.
* build root is correct.
* license field matches the actual license.
* license is open source-compatible.  License text included in package.
* source files match upstream:
   82e7c8fdb6211839246b788c040a796b  iksemel-1.2.tar.gz
* latest version is being packaged.
X BuildRequires are proper (libtool, as above)
* package builds in mock (development, x86_64) (after fixing libtool)
* rpmlint is silent.
* final provides and requires are sane:
  iksemel-1.2-2.fc6.x86_64.rpm
   libiksemel.so.3()(64bit)
   iksemel = 1.2-2.fc6
  =
   /sbin/ldconfig
  libiksemel.so.3()(64bit)

  iksemel-devel-1.2-2.fc6.x86_64.rpm
   iksemel-devel = 1.2-2.fc6
  =
   /bin/sh
   /sbin/install-info
   gnutls-devel
   iksemel = 1.2-2.fc6
   libiksemel.so.3()(64bit)
   pkgconfig

  iksemel-utils-1.2-2.fc6.x86_64.rpm
   iksemel-utils = 1.2-2.fc6
  =
   iksemel = 1.2-2.fc6
   libiksemel.so.3()(64bit)
* shared libraries are present; ldconfig is called properly and the unversioned
.so is in the -devel subpackage.
* package is not relocatable.
* owns the directories it creates.
* doesn't own any directories it shouldn't.
* no duplicates in %files.
* file permissions are appropriate.
* %clean is present.
X %check is not present but there is a test suite.
* scriptlets present and OK (ldconfig, install-info)
* code, not content.
* documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary.
* %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package.
* headers present, in -devel package.
* pkgconfig files present, in -devel package and pkgconfig is required.
* no libtool .la droppings.
* not a GUI app.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list