[Bug 193493] Review Request: iksemel - An XML parser library designed for Jabber applications
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Mon Jun 26 04:41:46 UTC 2006
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: iksemel - An XML parser library designed for Jabber applications
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193493
tibbs at math.uh.edu changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |tibbs at math.uh.edu
OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778
nThis| |
------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-06-26 00:33 EST -------
I noticed the following build failure:
+ aclocal
aclocal:configure.ac:14: warning: macro `AM_PROG_LIBTOOL' not found in library
which is solved by adding BuildRequires: libtool. However, I'm not sure why you
think you need to rerun the autotools. You can disable rpath just by using
make LIBTOOL=/usr/bin/libtool %{?_smp_mflags}
and then deleting the extra .a file that shows up.
Other than that, the package looks good and rpmlint is completely silent. There
is, however, a test suite that you should call (with "make check") in a %check
section.
Review:
* package meets naming and packaging guidelines.
* specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently.
* dist tag is present.
* build root is correct.
* license field matches the actual license.
* license is open source-compatible. License text included in package.
* source files match upstream:
82e7c8fdb6211839246b788c040a796b iksemel-1.2.tar.gz
* latest version is being packaged.
X BuildRequires are proper (libtool, as above)
* package builds in mock (development, x86_64) (after fixing libtool)
* rpmlint is silent.
* final provides and requires are sane:
iksemel-1.2-2.fc6.x86_64.rpm
libiksemel.so.3()(64bit)
iksemel = 1.2-2.fc6
=
/sbin/ldconfig
libiksemel.so.3()(64bit)
iksemel-devel-1.2-2.fc6.x86_64.rpm
iksemel-devel = 1.2-2.fc6
=
/bin/sh
/sbin/install-info
gnutls-devel
iksemel = 1.2-2.fc6
libiksemel.so.3()(64bit)
pkgconfig
iksemel-utils-1.2-2.fc6.x86_64.rpm
iksemel-utils = 1.2-2.fc6
=
iksemel = 1.2-2.fc6
libiksemel.so.3()(64bit)
* shared libraries are present; ldconfig is called properly and the unversioned
.so is in the -devel subpackage.
* package is not relocatable.
* owns the directories it creates.
* doesn't own any directories it shouldn't.
* no duplicates in %files.
* file permissions are appropriate.
* %clean is present.
X %check is not present but there is a test suite.
* scriptlets present and OK (ldconfig, install-info)
* code, not content.
* documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary.
* %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package.
* headers present, in -devel package.
* pkgconfig files present, in -devel package and pkgconfig is required.
* no libtool .la droppings.
* not a GUI app.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
More information about the Fedora-package-review
mailing list