[Bug 191015] Review Request: javasvn
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Mon Jun 26 17:30:15 UTC 2006
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: javasvn
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191015
tibbs at math.uh.edu changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |tibbs at math.uh.edu
OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778
nThis| |
------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-06-26 13:21 EST -------
Note that 1.0.6 is out, and I can no longer fetch 1.0.4 from upstream.
I looked at the license and it seems acceptable to me, but it also doesn't
correspond to anything rpnlint already knows about. I suggest just leaving
things as-is and ignoring the rpmlint complaint. I also suggest ignoring the
non-standard-group warning on the javadoc subpackage.
W: javasvn invalid-license TMate License
W: javasvn-debuginfo invalid-license TMate License
W: javasvn-javadoc non-standard-group Development/Documentation
W: javasvn-javadoc invalid-license TMate License
Other than that it does build fine in mock (with ganymed-ssh2 in a local repo)
and looks OK. If you update to 1.0.6 I'll do a full review.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
More information about the Fedora-package-review
mailing list