[Bug 196865] Review Request: audacious - A GTK2 based media player

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: audacious - A GTK2 based media player


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196865


j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
         AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl
OtherBugsDependingO|163776                      |163778
              nThis|                            |




------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl  2006-06-27 14:15 EST -------
Some quick initial remarks:
Why are these lines there but commented, for FC-5 ? :
# This is probably temporary until the above libs get their dependencies
# right
# BuildRequires:  libSM-devel libICE-devel libX11-devel libXrandr-devel
# BuildRequires:  libXau-devel libXi-devel libXft-devel libXinerama-devel
# BuildRequires:  libXcursor-devel libXrender-devel libXext-devel libXfixes-devel
# BuildRequires:  libXdmcp-devel libXt-devel

Why doesn't this obsolete and provides the current version of bmp. This is a
newer bugfixed/enhanced version of bmp right? Is there anything bmp can do that
this can't?

I thought this was intended as a bmp (and ultimatly xmms) replacement. Or are
you planning on maintaining audacious next to bmp? In that case do we really
want 3 xmms versions (the original + 2 forks) in FE?

I'll try todo a full review tomorrow. For today I've spend enough time behind my PC.


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.