[Bug 196057] Review Request: libhugetlbfs - easy access to huge pages of memory

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Wed Jun 28 15:32:56 UTC 2006


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: libhugetlbfs - easy access to huge pages of memory


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196057





------- Additional Comments From jwilson at redhat.com  2006-06-28 11:24 EST -------
(In reply to comment #18)
> Full review of requirements checklist:
> * build root is correct -- almost, but not quite, should be %{version} in
there instead of %
> {libhugetlbfs_version}

Good to go.

> * BuildRequires are proper -- need to remove /usr/include/gnu/stubs-32.h

Good to go.

> * rpmlint is silent -- not quite:
>     W: libhugetlbfs no-soname /usr/lib64/libhugetlbfs.so
>     E: libhugetlbfs script-without-shellbang
/usr/share/libhugetlbfs/ldscripts/elf_x86_64.xB
>     E: libhugetlbfs script-without-shellbang
/usr/share/libhugetlbfs/ldscripts/elf_x86_64.xBDT
> 
> The first isn't a problem, the 2nd and 3rd we can get rid of by chmod -x'ing
the ldscripts. (I'm 
> assuming they don't need to be executable).

Okay, those are taken care of, but I screwed up and forgot to mention one other
than I'd manually adjusted in a local copy of the spec. The version in the
changelog should be 0.20060627-1 instead of 0:20060627-1 (rpmlint complains
about a bad revision or some such thing).

> * owns the directories it creates -- missing a '%dir %{_datadir}/libhugetlbfs'
for the base package

Good to go.

Once the version in the changelog is corrected, I believe the package is ready
for Extrafication (pending sponsorship, of course).

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list