[Bug 185423] Review Request: php-pear-PEAR-Command-Packaging: make-rpm-spec command for PEAR
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Wed Jun 28 23:21:10 UTC 2006
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: php-pear-PEAR-Command-Packaging: make-rpm-spec command for PEAR
Alias: php-pear-PCP
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=185423
------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2006-06-28 19:12 EST -------
I read your post on fedora-packaging, did you check the fedora-packaging
archives? Your question comes up about once a month. Here is a similar thread
that comes to the conclusion I suggested:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-packaging/2006-March/msg00004.html
"Best Practice" is to keep the License tag as simple as possible and to place
the license text in %doc as I suggested.
Note also that this is a SHOULD and not a MUST. If you feel you do not want to
follow "best practices" then feel free not to.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
More information about the Fedora-package-review
mailing list