[Bug 185423] Review Request: php-pear-PEAR-Command-Packaging: make-rpm-spec command for PEAR

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Wed Jun 28 23:21:10 UTC 2006


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: php-pear-PEAR-Command-Packaging: make-rpm-spec command for PEAR
Alias: php-pear-PCP

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=185423





------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com  2006-06-28 19:12 EST -------
I read your post on fedora-packaging, did you check the fedora-packaging
archives?  Your question comes up about once a month.  Here is a similar thread
that comes to the conclusion I suggested:

https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-packaging/2006-March/msg00004.html

"Best Practice" is to keep the License tag as simple as possible and to place
the license text in %doc as I suggested.

Note also that this is a SHOULD and not a MUST.  If you feel you do not want to
follow "best practices" then feel free not to.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list