From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 1 00:18:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2006 20:18:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190310] New: Review Request: perl-File-Find-Rule-PPI - Add support for PPI queries to File::Find::Rule Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190310 Summary: Review Request: perl-File-Find-Rule-PPI - Add support for PPI queries to File::Find::Rule Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: jpo at di.uminho.pt QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://gsd.di.uminho.pt/jpo/software/fedora/perl-File-Find-Rule-PPI.spec SRPM URL: http://gsd.di.uminho.pt/jpo/software/fedora/perl-File-Find-Rule-PPI-0.03-1.src.rpm Description: File::Find::Rule::PPI allows you to integrate PPI content queries into your File::Find::Rule searches. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 1 00:19:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2006 20:19:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190310] Review Request: perl-File-Find-Rule-PPI - Add support for PPI queries to File::Find::Rule In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605010019.k410Jpwe021110@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-File-Find-Rule-PPI - Add support for PPI queries to File::Find::Rule https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190310 jpo at di.uminho.pt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |190308 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 1 00:20:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2006 20:20:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190308] Review Request: perl-PPI - Parse, Analyze and Manipulate Perl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605010020.k410K27e021187@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-PPI - Parse, Analyze and Manipulate Perl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190308 jpo at di.uminho.pt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |190310 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 1 01:04:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2006 21:04:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190315] New: Review Request: perl-Email-MIME - Easy MIME message parsing Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190315 Summary: Review Request: perl-Email-MIME - Easy MIME message parsing Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: jpo at di.uminho.pt QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://gsd.di.uminho.pt/jpo/software/fedora/perl-Email-MIME.spec SRPM URL: http://gsd.di.uminho.pt/jpo/software/fedora/perl-Email-MIME-1.82-2.src.rpm Description: This is an extension of the Email::Simple module, to handle MIME encoded messages. It takes a message as a string, splits it up into its constituent parts, and allows you access to various parts of the message. Headers are decoded from MIME encoding. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 1 01:06:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2006 21:06:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190316] New: Review Request: perl-Email-MIME-Modifier - Modify Email::MIME Objects Easily Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190316 Summary: Review Request: perl-Email-MIME-Modifier - Modify Email::MIME Objects Easily Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: jpo at di.uminho.pt QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://gsd.di.uminho.pt/jpo/software/fedora/perl-Email-MIME-Modifier.spec SRPM URL: http://gsd.di.uminho.pt/jpo/software/fedora/perl-Email-MIME-1.82-2.src.rpm Description: Provides a number of useful methods for manipulating MIME messages. These method are declared in the "Email::MIME" namespace, and are used with "Email::MIME" objects. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 1 01:07:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2006 21:07:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190316] Review Request: perl-Email-MIME-Modifier - Modify Email::MIME Objects Easily In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605010107.k4117G5J030391@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Email-MIME-Modifier - Modify Email::MIME Objects Easily https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190316 jpo at di.uminho.pt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |190315 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 1 01:07:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2006 21:07:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190315] Review Request: perl-Email-MIME - Easy MIME message parsing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605010107.k4117SVv030464@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Email-MIME - Easy MIME message parsing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190315 jpo at di.uminho.pt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |190316 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 1 01:20:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2006 21:20:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 166470] Review Request: taskjuggler In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605010120.k411KAPP032360@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: taskjuggler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=166470 ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2006-04-30 21:20 EST ------- E: taskjuggler binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/TaskJugglerUI ['/usr/lib64', '/usr/lib64/qt-3.3/lib'] Try configure --disable-rpath W: taskjuggler devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/libtaskjuggler.so It's a symlink, no big deal E: taskjuggler zero-length /usr/share/apps/taskjuggler/templates/en_US/Blank_File.tji Ignore. E: taskjuggler library-without-ldconfig-postin /usr/lib64/libtaskjuggler.so.3.0.3 E: taskjuggler library-without-ldconfig-postun /usr/lib64/libtaskjuggler.so.3.0.3 * Missing SMP flags. If it doesn't build with it, please add a comment (wiki: PackagingGuidelines#parallelmake) * No downloadable source. Please give the full URL in the Source tag. .desktop file needs some work, use desktop-file-install * Desktop file: vendor should be fedora (wiki: PackagingGuidelines#desktop) * Scriptlets: missing update-desktop-database (wiki: ScriptletSnippets) * Desktop file: the Categories tag should contain X-Fedora (wiki: PackagingGuidelines#desktop) * Desktop file: the Categories tag should contain Application (wiki: PackagingGuidelines#desktop) * Scriptlets: missing "gtk-update-icon-cache" in %post (wiki: ScriptletSnippets) * Scriptlets: missing "gtk-update-icon-cache" in %postun (wiki: ScriptletSnippets) The /usr/share/doc/HTML conflicts with Fedora's stuff, this and probably the contents of packages/taskjuggler should be flagged with %doc instead. Any way to remove the .la file? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 1 01:38:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2006 21:38:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190318] New: Review Request: perl-HTTP-Request-Params - Retrieve GET/POST Parameters from HTTP Requests Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190318 Summary: Review Request: perl-HTTP-Request-Params - Retrieve GET/POST Parameters from HTTP Requests Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: jpo at di.uminho.pt QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://gsd.di.uminho.pt/jpo/software/fedora/perl-HTTP-Request-Params.spec SRPM URL: http://gsd.di.uminho.pt/jpo/software/fedora/perl-HTTP-Request-Params-1.01-1.src.rpm Description: This software does all the dirty work of parsing HTTP Requests to find incoming query parameters. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 1 01:39:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2006 21:39:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190318] Review Request: perl-HTTP-Request-Params - Retrieve GET/POST Parameters from HTTP Requests In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605010139.k411dT85004765@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-HTTP-Request-Params - Retrieve GET/POST Parameters from HTTP Requests https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190318 jpo at di.uminho.pt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |190316 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 1 01:39:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2006 21:39:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190316] Review Request: perl-Email-MIME-Modifier - Modify Email::MIME Objects Easily In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605010139.k411drpY004872@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Email-MIME-Modifier - Modify Email::MIME Objects Easily https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190316 jpo at di.uminho.pt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |190318 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 1 01:41:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2006 21:41:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190319] New: Review Request: perl-HTTP-Recorder - Record interaction with web sites Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190319 Summary: Review Request: perl-HTTP-Recorder - Record interaction with web sites Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: jpo at di.uminho.pt QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://gsd.di.uminho.pt/jpo/software/fedora/perl-HTTP-Recorder.spec SRPM URL: http://gsd.di.uminho.pt/jpo/software/fedora/perl-HTTP-Recorder-0.05-1.src.rpm Description: Browser-independent recorder for recording interactions with web sites. Note: Article about HTTP::Recorder http://www.perl.com/lpt/a/2004/06/04/recorder.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 1 01:42:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2006 21:42:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190319] Review Request: perl-HTTP-Recorder - Record interaction with web sites In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605010142.k411gLlG005786@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-HTTP-Recorder - Record interaction with web sites https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190319 jpo at di.uminho.pt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |190318 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 1 01:42:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2006 21:42:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190318] Review Request: perl-HTTP-Request-Params - Retrieve GET/POST Parameters from HTTP Requests In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605010142.k411gOpq005817@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-HTTP-Request-Params - Retrieve GET/POST Parameters from HTTP Requests https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190318 jpo at di.uminho.pt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |190319 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 1 02:09:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2006 22:09:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 185262] Review Request: kchmviewer - CHM viewer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605010209.k4129Mip013295@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kchmviewer - CHM viewer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=185262 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|fedora-extras- |fedora-package- |list at redhat.com |review at redhat.com jpmahowald at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |jpmahowald at gmail.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2006-04-30 22:09 EST ------- rpmlint checks return: E: kchmviewer old-menu-entry /usr/share/applnk/kchmviewer.desktop Not necessary with it already in /usr/share/applications - package meets naming guidelines - package meets packaging guidelines - license (GPL) OK, text in %doc, matches source - spec file legible, in am. english - source matches upstream - package compiles on devel (x86_64) - no missing BR - no unnecessary BR - no locales - not relocatable - owns all directories that it creates - no duplicate files - permissions ok - %clean ok - macro use consistent - code, not content - no need for -docs - nothing in %doc affects runtime - .desktop file ok %description's a bit long, but oh well. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 1 03:06:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2006 23:06:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190308] Review Request: perl-PPI - Parse, Analyze and Manipulate Perl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605010306.k4136Fev025276@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-PPI - Parse, Analyze and Manipulate Perl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190308 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |tibbs at math.uh.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 1 04:53:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 May 2006 00:53:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190267] Review Request: raidem-music - Background music for the game raidem In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605010453.k414ruS2011713@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: raidem-music - Background music for the game raidem https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190267 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-05-01 00:53 EST ------- You're right, thanks! And thanks for the better way todo this too, I didn't think off passing --datadir twice (%configure already apsses it with another value). Fixing this in Rawhide right away luckiliy it seems that 0.3.1-1 didn't get pushed yet. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 1 07:06:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 May 2006 03:06:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190156] Review Request: php-pear-HTTP In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605010706.k417658h001433@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-HTTP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190156 Fedora at FamilleCollet.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |190252 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 1 07:06:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 May 2006 03:06:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190101] Review Request: php-pear-Log In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605010706.k4176Gfc001506@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Log https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190101 Fedora at FamilleCollet.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |190252 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 1 07:21:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 May 2006 03:21:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189197] Review Request: ghc-gtk2hs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605010721.k417LCAD004154@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ghc-gtk2hs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189197 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #128411|application/octet-stream |text/plain mime type| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 1 07:21:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 May 2006 03:21:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189725] Review Request: ifolder3-server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605010721.k417LC55004144@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ifolder3-server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189725 ville.skytta at iki.fi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 1 08:09:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 May 2006 04:09:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188369] Review Request: ctapi-cyberjack In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605010809.k41895Ke015753@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ctapi-cyberjack https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188369 ------- Additional Comments From frank-buettner at gmx.net 2006-05-01 04:08 EST ------- So I am working again:) And what is ctapi-cyberjack devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/libctapi-cyberjack.so?? It is an simble lib and no static oder header file. So why it is called an devel file?? But I can not find the pronlem for the "E: ctapi-cyberjack library-not-linked-against-libc" ldd say's this is linked again libc:( ldd /usr/lib/libctapi-cyberjack.so linux-gate.so.1 => (0x00d37000) /lib/libNoVersion.so.1 (0x007b6000) libusb-0.1.so.4 => /usr/lib/libusb-0.1.so.4 (0x0091e000) libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0x007c2000) /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x00d38000) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 1 08:28:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 May 2006 04:28:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 185262] Review Request: kchmviewer - CHM viewer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605010828.k418S4QW019858@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kchmviewer - CHM viewer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=185262 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-05-01 04:27 EST ------- I am importing the package now. Should I remove the /usr/share/applnk/kchmviewer.desktop file? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 1 09:00:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 May 2006 05:00:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188369] Review Request: ctapi-cyberjack In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605010900.k4190oMk027581@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ctapi-cyberjack https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188369 ------- Additional Comments From frank-buettner at gmx.net 2006-05-01 05:00 EST ------- so all is fixed. only the problem with the link to the lib exists:( W: ctapi-cyberjack devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/libctapi-cyberjack.so I have try to remove the file, but then the apps that use the lib will not run:( Because they call libctapi-cyberjack.so via dl_load() -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 1 09:58:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 May 2006 05:58:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190139] Review Request: rapidsvn - Graphical interface for the Subversion version-control system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605010958.k419wHtQ006647@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rapidsvn - Graphical interface for the Subversion version-control system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190139 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-05-01 05:58 EST ------- Based on input from extras-list, if you append LIBTOOL=/usr/bin/libtool to the make line, and then in %install delete the extra libsvncpp.a that crops up, everything comes out OK (FC5 and development, i386 and x86_64). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 1 10:01:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 May 2006 06:01:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188369] Review Request: ctapi-cyberjack In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605011001.k41A13Wn007190@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ctapi-cyberjack https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188369 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-05-01 06:01 EST ------- Great that you've almost all rpmlint errors and warnings fixed. About the last one: Hmm, With normal dyn linked libs the lniker will search for the -soname so xxx.so.0 and the plain .so symlink is only used during compile to find the real .so.x file. What apps are using dlopen, the included ones? Couldn't you fix them to use dlopen .so.0 ? The .so symlink really belongs in the -devel package. We could make an exception but thats rather ugly. For example there apps that ldopen libGL.so, but libGL.so still is in the -devel package and the apps are supposed to open libGL.so.1 The whole idea behind versioned .so is that an open will open the versioned lib so that if an ABI change happens ther app will keep working as long as the old version is not uninstalled. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 1 10:16:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 May 2006 06:16:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188369] Review Request: ctapi-cyberjack In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605011016.k41AGFdf010307@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ctapi-cyberjack https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188369 ------- Additional Comments From frank-buettner at gmx.net 2006-05-01 06:16 EST ------- I have done some little error. The lib for the CT-API dos not put in the ld cache, because all apps the use CT-API call must use the lib via dl_open(). The the error about ctapi-cyberjack library-without-ldconfig-postin is in this case not an error, because of the structure of the CT-API system. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 1 10:38:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 May 2006 06:38:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188369] Review Request: ctapi-cyberjack In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605011038.k41AcXCX015806@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ctapi-cyberjack https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188369 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-05-01 06:38 EST ------- (In reply to comment #33) > The lib for the CT-API dos not put in the ld cache, because all apps the use > CT-API call must use the lib via dl_open(). Hmm, is this written / documented somewhere? Since there are multiple possible providers for the ctapi (libopenctapi.so , libtowitoko.so, libctapi-cyberjack.so) this doesn't sound completly unlogical, but I wonder if its documented somewhere. Also how is a user supposed to find out what ctapi providers there are with all these non consistent names? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 1 10:47:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 May 2006 06:47:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187243] Review Request: lazarus : IDE and RAD tool for the free pascal compiler (fpc) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605011047.k41AlLjJ017647@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lazarus : IDE and RAD tool for the free pascal compiler (fpc) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187243 ------- Additional Comments From joost at cnoc.nl 2006-05-01 06:47 EST ------- It's a download from SourceForge.net. Here's the link again: http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/lazarus/lazarus-0.9.14-1.tar.gz You only have to select a mirror, on the right of the html you receive. I also placed it on my own website: http://www.cnoc.nl/fpc/lazarus-0.9.14-0.tar.gz -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 1 10:53:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 May 2006 06:53:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188369] Review Request: ctapi-cyberjack In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605011053.k41ArPx8018831@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ctapi-cyberjack https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188369 ------- Additional Comments From frank-buettner at gmx.net 2006-05-01 06:53 EST ------- The CT-API system is complete diferent from PC/SC When an app will use an reader via CT-API then it load's first the 3 function's CT_init CT_data and CT_close via dl_load. So for every reader you need an extra lib. On Windows this files called ctXX32.dll wehre XX is the name of the reader. So on Linux the files must be called libctapi-XX.so where XX is the name of the reader. And as an result of this the package for the towitoko reader must changed, because the wrong name. The complete description of the CT-API system is done in german because it was primaly develop for the german helth system. But niw in germany nearliy all application that need access to SmartCards use this system, because it is mutch simpler than PC/SC. There exits also an english description of the CT-API but can not tell if all correct in this description. When you will have an look to this vist http://www.teletrust.de here the next try http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/qsmartcard/ctapi-cyberjack-2.0.8-7.src.rpm?download -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 1 11:19:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 May 2006 07:19:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189197] Review Request: ghc-gtk2hs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605011119.k41BJe11023098@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ghc-gtk2hs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189197 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2006-05-01 07:19 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > 1. I modified the spec file so that I can find my way around more easily. > You are free to use it. Thank you! > 2. I think the documentation package should install the documentation > in gtk2hs-doc-%{version} or ghc-gtk2hs-doc-%{version}, since all > directories in /usr/share/doc are versioned. Yes, guess you're right. (It seems to be the default place gtk2hs installs the docs, though personally I quite like it since I have it bookmarked and it is nice not to have to update it every time the version is incremented. On the other hand it is probably cleaner to have the directory versioned.) > 3. /usr/lib/ghc should be owned by the packages that install into it, > otherwise it hangs around, if all packages have been removed. Fixed. > 4. Rather than remove the .o files in %preun, they should be %ghost'ed Good point - fixed. > 5. The package.conf.old file should also be %ghost'ed by the > ghc package otherwise, a complete uninstall leaves something > hanging around. Thanks, will fix that too. > 6. The demos should also be packaged. Good idea: I included them in -doc. > 7. rpmlint complains about non-devel packages requiring devel packages. > This should be ignored, otherwise we would have to append -devel > to all packages. Right - I did ponder renaming them all to -devel packages, but then there is the problem of the .o files used by ghci. > 8. rpmlint: > "W: ghc642-glade summary-ended-with-dot Haskell binding of glade for gtk2hs." > Remove the dot. Fixed. > 9. Currently, if someones builds a package requiring the gconf part > of gtk2hs, he will need to require ghc642-gconf, even if he doesn't > care about the exact version of ghc. Requiring ghc-gtk2hs does the > right thing, but only for gtk, glib and cairo. Would > "Provides: ghc-gconf" etc... work? Well that works, but then the problem is that ghc642-gconf will conflict with ghc641-gconf, etc. An alternative might be to make ghc-gtk2hs pull in all the subpackages perhaps? I updated the submission to: http://people.redhat.com/petersen/extras/ghc-gtk2hs.spec http://people.redhat.com/petersen/extras/ghc-gtk2hs-0.9.10-3.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 1 11:20:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 May 2006 07:20:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189197] Review Request: ghc-gtk2hs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605011120.k41BKK8v023231@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ghc-gtk2hs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189197 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 1 11:41:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 May 2006 07:41:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188369] Review Request: ctapi-cyberjack In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605011141.k41BfjtV027987@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ctapi-cyberjack https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188369 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-05-01 07:41 EST ------- I see, In that case the libctapi-xx.so shouldn't be versioned again, but then we have the problem of the ifd handler linking to it, or we could once again make the ifd-handler staticly linked to the ctapi part, but that would mean having essentially the same code on your HD twice. Still I believe this is the best, which effectivly means that you can undo all the makefile changes as upstream's makefile then does seem todo the right thing after all, sorry about all this. This might actually all workout nicely since with the ifd handler staitcly linked it will not auto require and has no reason to manually require the main package allowing for it to be installed seperatly. Did you already drop the versioning in your next try (and link the ifd handler staticly against ctapi-xxx?) ifso let me know and I'll do a full review as / when time permits. If not, please post yet another version. Also I can acutally read (and speak a bit) German, but your German is no doubt better, could you copy the relevants parts avout the libctapi-xxxx.so being the standard convention from the standard to a txt file and attach that? Then I can review the standard and file a bug against openct. I personally believe that since these .so files are unversioned and dlopened they should be put under /usr/lib/ctapi/ instead of in plain /usr/lib does the standard say anything about this? Sorry about all this ping - pong you've picked a hard one to start with and I want to get this right, currently the towitoko drivers aren't packaged and if we're going to set a precedent on how to handle this I would like to set a good precedent. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 1 11:43:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 May 2006 07:43:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 185262] Review Request: kchmviewer - CHM viewer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605011143.k41Bh6iO028314@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kchmviewer - CHM viewer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=185262 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-05-01 07:42 EST ------- Patrice, just use desktop-file-install --delete-original ... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 1 11:44:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 May 2006 07:44:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 185262] Review Request: kchmviewer - CHM viewer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605011144.k41BiaZf028745@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kchmviewer - CHM viewer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=185262 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-05-01 07:44 EST ------- Oops, better yet, change: desktop-file-install --vendor fedora \ --dir ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}%{_datadir}/applications \ --add-category X-Fedora \ kio-msits/kchmviewer.desktop to desktop-file-install --vendor fedora \ --dir ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}%{_datadir}/applications \ --add-category X-Fedora \ --delete-original \ $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/applnk/*/kchmviewer.desktop -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 1 11:59:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 May 2006 07:59:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188482] Review Request: scipy-0.4.8 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605011159.k41BxXjx031169@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scipy-0.4.8 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188482 ------- Additional Comments From ndbecker2 at verizon.net 2006-05-01 07:59 EST ------- These should work: http://nbecker.dyndns.org:8080/scipy.spec http://nbecker.dyndns.org:8080/scipy-0.4.8-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 1 12:17:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 May 2006 08:17:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188369] Review Request: ctapi-cyberjack In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605011217.k41CHSRQ001651@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ctapi-cyberjack https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188369 ------- Additional Comments From frank-buettner at gmx.net 2006-05-01 08:17 EST ------- The standart says noting about the the place of the libs. But /usr/lib/ctapi will be an solution. Normaly the ctapi libs will live under /usr/lib. The apps will normale only call dlopen(XX). XX=name of the lib. When put the files to /usr/lib/ctapi then there we have the next problem. Here the part of the doc about the dload function of the C lib about the search path: - (ELF only) If the executable file for the calling program contains a DT_RPATH tag, and does not contain a DT_RUNPATH tag, then the directories listed in the DT_RPATH tag are searched. - If the environment variable LD_LIBRARY_PATH is defined to contain a colon-separated list of directories, then these are searched. (As a security measure this variable is ignored for set-UID and set-GID programs.) - (ELF only) If the executable file for the calling program contains a DT_RUNPATH tag, then the directories listed in that tag are searched. - The cache file /etc/ld.so.cache (maintained by ldconfig(8)) is checked to see whether it contains an entry for filename. - The directories /lib and /usr/lib are searched (in that order). When the files are in /usr/lib/ctapi the the apps will not find it without set an global LD_LIBRARY_PATH. Or we simple add the files to /usr/lib/ctapi and put an extra config file to /etc/ld.so.conf.d But this have the problem the each ctapi driver muste create an extra dir. example: /usr/lib/ctapi/ReinerSCT/libctapi-cyberjack.so /usr/lib/ctapi/Kobil/libctapi-XXXX.so /usr/lib/ctapi/ZZ/libctapi-XXX.so ZZ= maufacture of the device XXX= produce name I think before I can work forwart we must found an global solution for CT-API in Fedora. Here the link to the offical CT-API doc: In german: http://www.teletrust.de/index.php?id=303 In english: http://www.teletrust.de/index.php?id=548 In my package the are 2 sample apps that use this API. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 1 12:18:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 May 2006 08:18:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188369] Review Request: ctapi-cyberjack In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605011218.k41CIWKS001840@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ctapi-cyberjack https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188369 ------- Additional Comments From frank-buettner at gmx.net 2006-05-01 08:18 EST ------- The import part is part 3 of the docu -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 1 14:01:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 May 2006 10:01:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190343] New: Review Request: VDR - Video Disk Recorder Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190343 Summary: Review Request: VDR - Video Disk Recorder Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: ville.skytta at iki.fi QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com http://www.cadsoft.de/vdr/ http://cachalot.mine.nu/5/SRPMS/vdr-1.4.0-2.src.rpm VDR implements a complete digital set-top-box and video recorder. It can work with signals received from satellites (DVB-S) as well as cable (DVB-C) and terrestrial (DVB-T) signals. At least one DVB card is required to run VDR. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 1 14:03:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 May 2006 10:03:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190344] New: Review Request: vdr-osdteletext - OSD teletext plugin for VDR Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190344 Summary: Review Request: vdr-osdteletext - OSD teletext plugin for VDR Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: ville.skytta at iki.fi QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com http://cachalot.mine.nu/5/SRPMS/vdr-osdteletext-0.5.1-20.src.rpm The OSD teletext plugin displays teletext directly on VDR's on-screen display, with sound and video from the current channel playing in the background. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 1 14:05:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 May 2006 10:05:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190345] New: Review Request: vdr-femon - DVB frontend status monitor plugin for VDR Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190345 Summary: Review Request: vdr-femon - DVB frontend status monitor plugin for VDR Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: ville.skytta at iki.fi QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com http://cachalot.mine.nu/5/SRPMS/vdr-femon-1.0.0-1.src.rpm DVB frontend status monitor is a plugin that displays some signal information parameters of the current tuned channel on VDR's OSD. You can zap through all your channels and the plugin should be monitoring always the right frontend. The transponder and stream information are also available in advanced display modes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 1 14:07:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 May 2006 10:07:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190346] New: Review Request: vdr-subtitles - DVB subtitles plugin for VDR Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190346 Summary: Review Request: vdr-subtitles - DVB subtitles plugin for VDR Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: ville.skytta at iki.fi QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com http://cachalot.mine.nu/5/SRPMS/vdr-subtitles-0.3.11-2.src.rpm There are two subtitling services specified in the DVB standards. One is the teletext subtitles and the other one is DVB subtitles. The main difference between these two is that the teletext subtitles are text (sent via teletext service) and DVB subtitles are pixel-based graphics. This plugin implements a DVB subtitles decoder for VDR. The plugin decodes and displays the subtitles and also adds the selected subtitling streams to the VDR recordings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 1 14:08:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 May 2006 10:08:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190343] Review Request: VDR - Video Disk Recorder In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605011408.k41E8RwX024715@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: VDR - Video Disk Recorder https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190343 ville.skytta at iki.fi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |enrico.scholz at informatik.tu- | |chemnitz.de OtherBugsDependingO| |190344, 190345, 190346 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2006-05-01 10:08 EST ------- (More plugins may follow later if/when this package is in.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 1 14:08:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 May 2006 10:08:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190345] Review Request: vdr-femon - DVB frontend status monitor plugin for VDR In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605011408.k41E8cTv024780@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vdr-femon - DVB frontend status monitor plugin for VDR https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190345 ville.skytta at iki.fi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |190343 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 1 14:08:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 May 2006 10:08:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190344] Review Request: vdr-osdteletext - OSD teletext plugin for VDR In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605011408.k41E8xYK024833@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vdr-osdteletext - OSD teletext plugin for VDR https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190344 ville.skytta at iki.fi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |190343 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 1 14:09:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 May 2006 10:09:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190346] Review Request: vdr-subtitles - DVB subtitles plugin for VDR In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605011409.k41E9Bgi024879@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vdr-subtitles - DVB subtitles plugin for VDR https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190346 ville.skytta at iki.fi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |190343 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 1 15:16:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 May 2006 11:16:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188482] Review Request: scipy-0.4.8 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605011516.k41FGLEk010230@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scipy-0.4.8 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188482 ------- Additional Comments From ed at eh3.com 2006-05-01 11:16 EST ------- Hi Neal, this isn't a full review, just a few quick observations: - Is this your first package? If so, we'll add FE-NEEDSPONSOR per: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/Contributors - incorrect BuildRoot: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines - please either make Source0 a full URL or indicate (with some comments in the spec file) how one can generate the tar-ball from, for instance, the upstream CVS [this is so we can more easily verify that source matches upstream] - please remove Prefix and Vendor - please add a changelog - please consider changing %defattr(-,root,root) to %defattr(-,root,root,-) You might want to take a look at the review guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines and build your rpm in mock ("yum install mock") and run your generated RPM through rpmlint ("yum install rpmlint") to see if you might find any other items -- it could make the job easier easier for reviewers! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 1 15:57:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 May 2006 11:57:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190304] Review Request: mtd-utils In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605011557.k41FvxQO023995@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mtd-utils https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190304 jwboyer at jdub.homelinux.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |jwboyer at jdub.homelinux.org OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jwboyer at jdub.homelinux.org 2006-05-01 11:57 EST ------- I'll review this tonight. At first glance, it seems fine. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 1 16:07:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 May 2006 12:07:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189197] Review Request: ghc-gtk2hs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605011607.k41G7tAw026774@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ghc-gtk2hs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189197 ------- Additional Comments From gemi at bluewin.ch 2006-05-01 12:07 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > Yes, guess you're right. (It seems to be the default place gtk2hs installs > the docs, though personally I quite like it since I have it bookmarked and > it is nice not to have to update it every time the version is incremented. I completely agree! However versioning the doc directories is the convention, and unfortunately this convention will hardly change. > > 9. Currently, if someones builds a package requiring the gconf part > > of gtk2hs, he will need to require ghc642-gconf, even if he doesn't > > care about the exact version of ghc. Requiring ghc-gtk2hs does the > > right thing, but only for gtk, glib and cairo. Would > > "Provides: ghc-gconf" etc... work? > > Well that works, but then the problem is that ghc642-gconf will conflict with > ghc641-gconf, etc. An alternative might be to make ghc-gtk2hs pull in all the > subpackages perhaps? Wouldn't that defeat the purpose of splitting off these packages? I wonder if this versioning scheme is really worth the effort. After all there are no shared libraries, where compatibility packages would be necessary. Of course everytime ghc gets updated, the dependent packages must be rebuilt... I am currently building the package in mock... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 1 16:07:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 May 2006 12:07:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188435] Review Request: glibrary-1.0.1 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605011607.k41G7pNV026744@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glibrary-1.0.1 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188435 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |tcallawa at redhat.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2006-05-01 12:07 EST ------- Much better! The one point (not a blocker) is that you can use: %{_datadir}/%{name}/ instead of %{_datadir}/%{name}/* Gives you the same end result. I try to avoid * wherever possible. Good: - rpmlint checks return: W: glibrary incoherent-version-in-changelog 1.0.1-2 1.0.1-1 E: glibrary script-without-shellbang /usr/share/doc/glibrary-1.0.1/README E: glibrary script-without-shellbang /usr/share/doc/glibrary-1.0.1/AUTHORS E: glibrary script-without-shellbang /usr/share/doc/glibrary-1.0.1/COPYING E: glibrary script-without-shellbang /usr/share/doc/glibrary-1.0.1/ChangeLog Make sure you bump your release number when you make a change. :) Also, you should chmod -x those doc files, so that rpmlint doesn't think that they are scripts. - package meets naming guidelines - package meets packaging guidelines - license (GPL) OK, text in %doc, matches source - spec file legible, in am. english - source matches upstream - package compiles on devel (x86) - no missing BR - no unnecessary BR - locales handled properly - not relocatable - owns all directories that it creates - no duplicate files - permissions ok - %clean ok - macro use consistent - code, not content - no need for -docs - nothing in %doc affects runtime - .desktop file ok (might consider adding an icon) All in all, this is much better. Just some minor changes to make before you build, but I'm convinced that you have a better grasp on things. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 1 16:22:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 May 2006 12:22:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188435] Review Request: glibrary-1.0.1 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605011622.k41GMTr7029903@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glibrary-1.0.1 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188435 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2006-05-01 12:22 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > Much better! The one point (not a blocker) is that you can use: > %{_datadir}/%{name}/ > > instead of > > %{_datadir}/%{name}/* > > Gives you the same end result. Nope, the former results in ownership of the directory in the package (which is desirable in this case), the latter does not. Properly owning dirs is a MUST per the review guidelines. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 1 16:22:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 May 2006 12:22:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 181831] Review Request: bitbake - Build Tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605011622.k41GMhHY030006@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bitbake - Build Tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=181831 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|fedora-extras- |fedora-package- |list at redhat.com |review at redhat.com jpmahowald at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2006-05-01 12:22 EST ------- - rpmlint checks return: E: bitbake non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/bb/build.py 0644 E: bitbake non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/bb/parse/parse_py/BBHandler.py 0644 E: bitbake non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/bb/fetch/local.py 0644 E: bitbake non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/bb/data.py 0644 E: bitbake non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/bb/fetch/cvs.py 0644 E: bitbake non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/bb/fetch/svn.py 0644 E: bitbake non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/bb/event.py 0644 E: bitbake non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/bb/fetch/wget.py 0644 E: bitbake non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/bb/parse/parse_py/ConfHandler.py 0644 E: bitbake non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/bb/fetch/__init__.py 0644 E: bitbake non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/bb/cache.py 0644 E: bitbake non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/bb/parse/parse_py/__init__.py 0644 E: bitbake non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/bb/__init__.py 0644 E: bitbake non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/bb/fetch/git.py 0644 E: bitbake non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/bb/shell.py 0644 E: bitbake non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/bb/fetch/svk.py 0644 Which are ignorable. - package meets naming guidelines - package meets packaging guidelines - license (GPL) OK, text in %doc, matches source - spec file legible, in am. english - source matches upstream - package compiles on devel (x86_64) - no missing BR - no locales - not relocatable - owns all directories that it creates - no duplicate files - permissions ok - %clean ok - macro use consistent - code, not content - no need for -docs - nothing in %doc affects runtime Building html, xhtml, text, and pdf docs seems a bit redundant. You can drop html if you like. - no need for .desktop file APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 1 16:28:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 May 2006 12:28:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190362] New: Review Request: unifdef Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190362 Summary: Review Request: unifdef Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: dwmw2 at redhat.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://david.woodhou.se/unifdef.spec SRPM URL: http://david.woodhou.se/unifdef-1.171-2.src.rpm Description: Unifdef is useful for removing ifdefed lines from a file while otherwise leaving the file alone. Unifdef acts on #ifdef, #ifndef, #else, and #endif lines, and it knows only enough about C and C++ to know when one of these is inactive because it is inside a comment, or a single or double quote. This is already in Core for rawhide. Could do with FC4 and FC5 builds in Extras though. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 1 16:51:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 May 2006 12:51:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190362] Review Request: unifdef In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605011651.k41Gp0Oa005938@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: unifdef https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190362 jkeating at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |jkeating at redhat.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-05-01 12:50 EST ------- Given the review done in 189937 I'm going to approve this package for Extras. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 1 16:53:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 May 2006 12:53:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190362] Review Request: unifdef In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605011653.k41Gr6JI006596@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: unifdef https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190362 jkeating at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |189937 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 1 16:53:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 May 2006 12:53:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189937] Review Request: unifdef In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605011653.k41GrIPd006674@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: unifdef https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189937 jkeating at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |190362 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 1 17:19:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 May 2006 13:19:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190362] Review Request: unifdef In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605011719.k41HJbYN014286@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: unifdef https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190362 ------- Additional Comments From jpo at di.uminho.pt 2006-05-01 13:19 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=128452) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=128452&action=view) unidef.spec.patch - dist tag and other minor modifications Patch: * adds a dist tag * silences the setup setup (-q option) * replaces "mkdir -p" by "install -d -m0755" * preserves the file timestamps (install -p) * adds a blank line between the %setup and %build sections -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 1 17:29:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 May 2006 13:29:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 186919] Review Request: eric: Python IDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605011729.k41HTgc1017076@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eric: Python IDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=186919 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|fedora-extras- |fedora-package- |list at redhat.com |review at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-05-01 13:29 EST ------- Those are all(most?) harmless rpmlint warnings. python scripts (*.py files) don't have to be executable. It appears fc5+ (auto)generates .pyo files... I wonder if there's anything special that needs to be done packaging-wise? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 1 17:30:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 May 2006 13:30:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 186919] Review Request: eric: Python IDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605011730.k41HUjja017392@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eric: Python IDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=186919 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-05-01 13:30 EST ------- %changelog * Mon May 1 2006 Rex Dieter 3.9.0-1 - 3.9.0 - create/own %%{_datadir}/eric, for .api files - generate .api files for python, PyQt - %%triggerin PyQt4/PyKDE to (auto)generate .api files Spec Name or Url: http://kde-redhat.unl.edu/apt/kde-redhat/SPECS/eric-3.9.0-1.spec SRPM Name or Url: http://kde-redhat.unl.edu/apt/kde-redhat/all/SRPMS.stable/eric-3.9.0-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 1 17:33:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 May 2006 13:33:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190367] New: Review Request: PyKDE: Python bindings for KDE Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190367 Summary: Review Request: PyKDE: Python bindings for KDE Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: rdieter at math.unl.edu QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://kde-redhat.unl.edu/apt/kde-redhat/SPECS/PyKDE-3.15.2-0.3.20060422.spec SRPM URL: http://kde-redhat.unl.edu/apt/kde-redhat/all/SRPMS.stable/PyKDE-3.15.2-0.3.20060422.src.rpm Description: These are the Python bindings for KDE. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 1 17:34:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 May 2006 13:34:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190367] Review Request: PyKDE: Python bindings for KDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605011734.k41HYVfo018665@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PyKDE: Python bindings for KDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190367 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-05-01 13:34 EST ------- For devel/fc6 branch only, since it requires sip >= 4.4.3 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 1 18:02:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 May 2006 14:02:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177827] Review Request: python-ctypes - Advanced Foreign Function Interface for Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605011802.k41I25DQ027309@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-ctypes - Advanced Foreign Function Interface for Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177827 ------- Additional Comments From toshio at tiki-lounge.com 2006-05-01 14:01 EST ------- Hey Paul -- your srpm is only 4096 bytes so there's something wrong. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 1 18:09:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 May 2006 14:09:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189268] Review Request: xscreensaver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605011809.k41I9pte030017@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xscreensaver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189268 ------- Additional Comments From rstrode at redhat.com 2006-05-01 14:09 EST ------- great to hear! Jesse do you have any comments about Mamoru's proposed package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 1 18:18:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 May 2006 14:18:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189268] Review Request: xscreensaver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605011818.k41IIKAB032704@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xscreensaver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189268 ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-05-01 14:18 EST ------- Just to double check, all the runtime defines are defaulted to something that is what we want in the plague build env right? We won't be able to pass rpmbuild options inside the build system so they need to default to what makes sense. Other than that a cursory look looks ok, although this is a very complicated spec file (: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 1 18:50:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 May 2006 14:50:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190308] Review Request: perl-PPI - Parse, Analyze and Manipulate Perl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605011850.k41IoqfD013744@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-PPI - Parse, Analyze and Manipulate Perl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190308 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-05-01 14:50 EST ------- Sorry this took so long; I was in the middle of the review when I had an emergency at the office. I don't think this is a blocker; it's proably a mock artifact, but I don't quite understand the issue: t/14_charsets....................ok 11/11 skipped: Bizare Unicode-incompatible locale detected The code that checks this is: # In some (weird) cases with custom locales, things aren't words # that should be unless ( "?" =~ /\w/ ) { skip( "Bizare Unicode-incompatible locale detected", 11 ); } This check fails in mock on x86_64 and i386, FC5 and development. Review: * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written, uses macros consistently and follows the Perl template. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible; text is included in the package. * source files match upstream: a629d953e0002813061c4308c64993f6 PPI-1.112.tar.gz a629d953e0002813061c4308c64993f6 PPI-1.112.tar.gz-srpm * latest version is being packaged. O Extra BuildRequires: satisfiable in the default build environment; not a blocker. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane. * no shared libraries are present. * package is not relocatable. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * %clean is present. O %check is present and all tests pass, but some tests were skipped: All tests successful, 11 subtests skipped. Files=31, Tests=5844, 17 wallclock secs (15.13 cusr + 0.80 csys = 15.93 CPU) * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no libtool .la droppings. * not a GUI app. APPROVED, but please do investigate the failing test. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 1 19:10:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 May 2006 15:10:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177827] Review Request: python-ctypes - Advanced Foreign Function Interface for Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605011910.k41JAP9v019392@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-ctypes - Advanced Foreign Function Interface for Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177827 ------- Additional Comments From pnasrat at redhat.com 2006-05-01 15:10 EST ------- Should be better now - sha1sum: f7a7efac9246e3195a6fdb39a10d84d5ed6ff6e6 python-ctypes-0.9.9.6-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 1 19:17:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 May 2006 15:17:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190310] Review Request: perl-File-Find-Rule-PPI - Add support for PPI queries to File::Find::Rule In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605011917.k41JHQMr021427@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-File-Find-Rule-PPI - Add support for PPI queries to File::Find::Rule https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190310 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |tibbs at math.uh.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 1 19:40:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 May 2006 15:40:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 178922] Review Request: asterisk - The Open Source PBX In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605011940.k41Je4Hc028058@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: asterisk - The Open Source PBX https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=178922 ------- Additional Comments From jeff at ollie.clive.ia.us 2006-05-01 15:39 EST ------- (In reply to comment #40) > (In reply to comment #31) > > > Including chan_bluetooth would also be good. > > chan_bluetooth is of questionable quality AFAIK, so I don't know if this is wise > to include. Couldn't this be in a separate package? I don't know about the quality (I don't have the necessary equipment to test with), but I packaged chan_bluetooth as a separate subpackage. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 1 19:59:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 May 2006 15:59:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187243] Review Request: lazarus : IDE and RAD tool for the free pascal compiler (fpc) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605011959.k41JxmNE002051@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lazarus : IDE and RAD tool for the free pascal compiler (fpc) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187243 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-05-01 15:59 EST ------- If you use "download.sourceforge.net" (or dl.sf.net if you hate typing) then you get a direct download without having to select a mirror. Some have had better luck using easynews.dl.sf.net. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 1 20:10:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 May 2006 16:10:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190310] Review Request: perl-File-Find-Rule-PPI - Add support for PPI queries to File::Find::Rule In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605012010.k41KAKiA005228@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-File-Find-Rule-PPI - Add support for PPI queries to File::Find::Rule https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190310 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-05-01 16:10 EST ------- * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written, uses macros consistently and follows the Perl template. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible; text is included in the package. * source files match upstream: a63dfd3b079258f4766b6445c1614b0f File-Find-Rule-PPI-0.03.tar.gz a63dfd3b079258f4766b6445c1614b0f File-Find-Rule-PPI-0.03.tar.gz-srpm * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane. * no shared libraries are present. * package is not relocatable. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * %clean is present. * %check is present and all tests pass: All tests successful. Files=3, Tests=7, 1 wallclock secs ( 0.24 cusr + 0.09 csys = 0.33 CPU) * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no libtool .la droppings. * not a GUI app. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 1 20:13:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 May 2006 16:13:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190315] Review Request: perl-Email-MIME - Easy MIME message parsing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605012013.k41KDMPf006249@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Email-MIME - Easy MIME message parsing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190315 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |tibbs at math.uh.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 1 20:34:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 May 2006 16:34:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190362] Review Request: unifdef In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605012034.k41KYai1014387@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: unifdef https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190362 ------- Additional Comments From dwmw2 at redhat.com 2006-05-01 16:34 EST ------- thanks. Updated specfile and src.rpm at http://david.woodhou.se/unifdef.spec and http://david.woodhou.se/unifdef-1.171-3.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 1 20:42:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 May 2006 16:42:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190213] Review Request: gq - Graphical LDAP directory browser and editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605012042.k41KgIwY017665@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gq - Graphical LDAP directory browser and editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190213 ------- Additional Comments From terjeros at phys.ntnu.no 2006-05-01 16:42 EST ------- > 1. The handling of the desktop file is incorrect. Refer to > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-254ddf07aae20a23ced8cecc219d8f73926e9755 Thanks for the ref, fixed. > 2. Unnecessary BuildRequires: krb5-devel (provided by openssl-devel) OK, fixed. New, improved package available here: Spec: http://www.pvv.ntnu.no/~terjeros/rpms/gq/gq.spec SRPM: http://www.pvv.ntnu.no/~terjeros/rpms/gq/gq-1.0.0-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 1 20:57:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 May 2006 16:57:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189197] Review Request: ghc-gtk2hs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605012057.k41Kvacg022837@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ghc-gtk2hs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189197 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2006-05-01 16:57 EST ------- (In reply to comment #6) > > Well that works, but then the problem is that ghc642-gconf will conflict with > > ghc641-gconf, etc. An alternative might be to make ghc-gtk2hs pull in all the > > subpackages perhaps? > Wouldn't that defeat the purpose of splitting off these packages? > > I wonder if this versioning scheme is really worth the effort. After all > there are no shared libraries, where compatibility packages would be > necessary. Of course everytime ghc gets updated, the dependent packages > must be rebuilt... But ghc642-gtk requires ghc642, so what happens when one upgrades to ghc643? I don't think it will be possible to rebuild all ghc built libs immediately after a new ghc release typically. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 1 21:26:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 May 2006 17:26:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189197] Review Request: ghc-gtk2hs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605012126.k41LQoHT030508@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ghc-gtk2hs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189197 ------- Additional Comments From gemi at bluewin.ch 2006-05-01 17:26 EST ------- (In reply to comment #7) > But ghc642-gtk requires ghc642, so what happens when one upgrades to ghc643? > I don't think it will be possible to rebuild all ghc built libs immediately > after a new ghc release typically. I see the problem... There is probably no better way out in the current state of affairs. However I just wanted to have written down for the posterity that I do consider it unsatisfactory :-) The package builds fine in mock. Installing the packages works and the demo programs build perfectly well. I find it a little annoying that the doc directories are: ghc642-gtk-0.9.10 ghc-gtk2hs-doc-0.9.10 More consistent would be: ghc-gtk2hs-0.9.10 ghc-gtk2hs-doc-0.9.10 This would mean, that the doc files would go in the ghc-gtk2hs-0.9.10 package which is currently. Is is possible however to install the subpackages without the main package. Probably one could make the package ghc642-gtk require ghc-gtk2hs, so that ghc-gtk2hs is always installed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 1 21:30:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 May 2006 17:30:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190390] New: Review Request: AGReader: Console reader for viewing AmigaGuide files Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190390 Summary: Review Request: AGReader: Console reader for viewing AmigaGuide files Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: packages at amiga-hardware.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.dribble.org.uk/AGReader.spec SRPM URL: http://www.dribble.org.uk/AGReader-1.1-6.fc4.src.rpm Description: Hi, I would appreciate a review of this package to get it into Fedora Extras. This is also my first package, so I would appreciate a sponsor. Thanks. A viewer for the UNIX console which can read and display AmigaGuide files. It supports all of the v39 AmigaGuide specification possible and supports a large subset of the v40 specifications. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 1 21:34:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 May 2006 17:34:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190393] New: Review Request: AGReader - Console reader for viewing AmigaGuide files Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190393 Summary: Review Request: AGReader - Console reader for viewing AmigaGuide files Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: packages at amiga-hardware.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.dribble.org.uk/AGReader.spec SRPM URL: http://www.dribble.org.uk/AGReader-1.1-6.fc4.src.rpm Description: Hi, this is my first package so I'd appreciate a review and a sponsor. Thanks a lot. A viewer for the UNIX console which can read and display AmigaGuide files. It supports all of the v39 AmigaGuide specification possible and supports a large subset of the v40 specifications. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 1 21:38:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 May 2006 17:38:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190394] New: Review Request: AGReader - Console reader for viewing AmigaGuide files Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190394 Summary: Review Request: AGReader - Console reader for viewing AmigaGuide files Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: packages at amiga-hardware.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.dribble.org.uk/AGReader.spec SRPM URL: http://www.dribble.org.uk/AGReader-1.1-6.fc4.src.rpm Description: Hi, this is my first package so I'd appreciate a review and a sponsor. Thanks a lot. A viewer for the UNIX console which can read and display AmigaGuide files. It supports all of the v39 AmigaGuide specification possible and supports a large subset of the v40 specifications. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 1 21:43:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 May 2006 17:43:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190394] Review Request: AGReader - Console reader for viewing AmigaGuide files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605012143.k41LhRo3003394@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: AGReader - Console reader for viewing AmigaGuide files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190394 packages at amiga-hardware.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE ------- Additional Comments From packages at amiga-hardware.com 2006-05-01 17:43 EST ------- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 190390 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 1 21:43:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 May 2006 17:43:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190390] Review Request: AGReader: Console reader for viewing AmigaGuide files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605012143.k41Lhd6f003477@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: AGReader: Console reader for viewing AmigaGuide files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190390 ------- Additional Comments From packages at amiga-hardware.com 2006-05-01 17:43 EST ------- *** Bug 190394 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 1 21:45:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 May 2006 17:45:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190393] Review Request: AGReader - Console reader for viewing AmigaGuide files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605012145.k41Ljm6A004144@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: AGReader - Console reader for viewing AmigaGuide files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190393 packages at amiga-hardware.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE ------- Additional Comments From packages at amiga-hardware.com 2006-05-01 17:45 EST ------- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 190390 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 1 21:46:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 May 2006 17:46:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190390] Review Request: AGReader: Console reader for viewing AmigaGuide files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605012146.k41Lk94M004337@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: AGReader: Console reader for viewing AmigaGuide files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190390 ------- Additional Comments From packages at amiga-hardware.com 2006-05-01 17:45 EST ------- *** Bug 190393 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 1 21:55:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 May 2006 17:55:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190396] New: Review Request: netpanzer - An Online Multiplayer Tactical Warfare Game Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190396 Summary: Review Request: netpanzer - An Online Multiplayer Tactical Warfare Game Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: hugo at devin.com.br QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.devin.com.br/eitch/rpm/fedora/SPECS/netpanzer.spec SRPM URL: http://www.devin.com.br/eitch/rpm/fedora/5/SRPMS/netpanzer-0.8-1.src.rpm Description: netPanzer is an online multiplayer tactical warfare game designed for FAST ACTION combat. Gameplay concentrates on the core -- no resource management is needed. The game is based on quick tactical action and unit management in real-time. Battles progress quickly and constantly as destroyed players respawn with a set of new units. Players can join or leave multiplayer games at any time. This is my new package and I need a sponsor, please :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 1 21:58:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 May 2006 17:58:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190397] New: Review Request: netpanzer-data - Data files for netpanzer Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190397 Summary: Review Request: netpanzer-data - Data files for netpanzer Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: hugo at devin.com.br QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.devin.com.br/eitch/rpm/fedora/SPECS/netpanzer-data.spec SRPM URL: http://www.devin.com.br/eitch/rpm/fedora/5/SRPMS/netpanzer-data-0.8-1.src.rpm Description: This package contains the graphics and sounds for netpanzer, an online multiplayer tactical warfare game designed for FAST ACTION combat. This is my first set of packages, so I need a sponsor please :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 1 22:09:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 May 2006 18:09:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190213] Review Request: gq - Graphical LDAP directory browser and editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605012209.k41M9Gdp011890@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gq - Graphical LDAP directory browser and editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190213 ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at ameritech.net 2006-05-01 18:09 EST ------- It would be a little easier to patch the current desktop file included in the tarball, instead of adding an additional one. That way you wouldn't be having to exclude (which really should be removed instead) the old desktop file. Your desktop-file-install call would be like this: desktop-file-install --vendor fedora --delete-original \ --dir %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/applications \ --add-category X-Fedora \ %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/applications/%{name}.desktop I'll attach the patch for you to this bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 1 22:09:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 May 2006 18:09:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190213] Review Request: gq - Graphical LDAP directory browser and editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605012209.k41M9s2b012051@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gq - Graphical LDAP directory browser and editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190213 ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at ameritech.net 2006-05-01 18:09 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=128461) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=128461&action=view) Desktop Patch -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 1 22:10:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 May 2006 18:10:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190396] Review Request: netpanzer - An Online Multiplayer Tactical Warfare Game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605012210.k41MAqRL012457@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: netpanzer - An Online Multiplayer Tactical Warfare Game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190396 andreas at bawue.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |andreas at bawue.net OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 1 22:11:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 May 2006 18:11:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190397] Review Request: netpanzer-data - Data files for netpanzer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605012211.k41MBRjP012610@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: netpanzer-data - Data files for netpanzer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190397 andreas at bawue.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |andreas at bawue.net OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 1 22:16:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 May 2006 18:16:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190393] Review Request: AGReader - Console reader for viewing AmigaGuide files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605012216.k41MG86V014157@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: AGReader - Console reader for viewing AmigaGuide files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190393 ville.skytta at iki.fi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 1 22:16:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 May 2006 18:16:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190394] Review Request: AGReader - Console reader for viewing AmigaGuide files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605012216.k41MGg8q014312@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: AGReader - Console reader for viewing AmigaGuide files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190394 ville.skytta at iki.fi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 1 23:26:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 May 2006 19:26:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190267] Review Request: raidem-music - Background music for the game raidem In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605012326.k41NQRNZ032593@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: raidem-music - Background music for the game raidem https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190267 ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2006-05-01 19:26 EST ------- (In reply to comment #7) > (In reply to comment #5) > > > But if you're not sure feel free to post this to f-e-l. I'm just trying to > > change your mind before we get a flamefest there :) > > I agree that it should be acceptable, but I don't think the guidelines are > crystal clear in this case. The guidelines also state "If you are unsure if > something is considered approved content, ask on fedora-extras-list." I'd > rather get f-e-l's opinion and have this flamefest now instead of later when > someone discovers a package full of ogg files. :) This is going to be brought up at the next FESCO meeting and updated in the packaging guidelines. Based on the feedback from f-e-l so far, it shouldn't be a problem. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 1 23:29:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 May 2006 19:29:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189775] Review Request: dnsmasq - A lightweight DHCP/caching DNS server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605012329.k41NTaJp000794@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dnsmasq - A lightweight DHCP/caching DNS server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189775 jima at auroralinux.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jm at mailsnare.net ------- Additional Comments From jima at auroralinux.org 2006-05-01 19:29 EST ------- *** Bug 190379 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 1 23:37:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 May 2006 19:37:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190315] Review Request: perl-Email-MIME - Easy MIME message parsing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605012337.k41Nbl2K003050@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Email-MIME - Easy MIME message parsing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190315 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-05-01 19:37 EST ------- * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written, uses macros consistently and follows the Perl specfile template. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. It's not included separately in the package, but this is not necessary as the upstream tarball does not include it. * source files match upstream: fe917f83f7ff5f6425e388857a7400eb Email-MIME-1.82.tar.gz fe917f83f7ff5f6425e388857a7400eb Email-MIME-1.82.tar.gz-srpm * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane. * no shared libraries are present. * package is not relocatable. * owns the directory it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * %clean is present. * %check is present and all tests pass: All tests successful. Files=3, Tests=20, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.13 cusr + 0.05 csys = 0.18 CPU) * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no libtool .la droppings. * not a GUI app. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 1 23:40:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 May 2006 19:40:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190316] Review Request: perl-Email-MIME-Modifier - Modify Email::MIME Objects Easily In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605012340.k41NeLKV003828@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Email-MIME-Modifier - Modify Email::MIME Objects Easily https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190316 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |tibbs at math.uh.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 2 00:00:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 May 2006 20:00:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190316] Review Request: perl-Email-MIME-Modifier - Modify Email::MIME Objects Easily In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605020000.k4200f9w008289@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Email-MIME-Modifier - Modify Email::MIME Objects Easily https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190316 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-05-01 20:00 EST ------- Oops, wrong SRPM link. I'm going to assume you meant http://gsd.di.uminho.pt/jpo/software/fedora/perl-Email-MIME-Modifier-1.42-2.src.rpm Review: * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written, uses macros consistently and follows the Perl specfile template. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. It's not included separately in the package, but this is not necessary as the upstream tarball does not include it. * source files match upstream: 3acf1c19da93334be37f3f9a288acd91 Email-MIME-Modifier-1.42.tar.gz 3acf1c19da93334be37f3f9a288acd91 Email-MIME-Modifier-1.42.tar.gz-srpm * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane. * no shared libraries are present. * package is not relocatable. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * %clean is present. * %check is present and all tests pass: All tests successful. Files=5, Tests=68, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.22 cusr + 0.06 csys = 0.28 CPU) * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no libtool .la droppings. * not a GUI app. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 2 00:18:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 May 2006 20:18:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190304] Review Request: mtd-utils In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605020018.k420IIqs011593@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mtd-utils https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190304 jwboyer at jdub.homelinux.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|jwboyer at jdub.homelinux.org |dwmw2 at redhat.com OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jwboyer at jdub.homelinux.org 2006-05-01 20:18 EST ------- Completed MUST items: - rpmlint output: [jwboyer at vader i386]$ rpmlint -v mtd-utils-1.0.0-1.i386.rpm I: mtd-utils checking [jwboyer at vader i386]$ - named according to the Package Naming guidlines - spec file name matches %{name}.spec - meets Packaging Guidelines - licensed under the GPL - License: field matches - MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. - source SHA1 sum matches upstream - compiles and builds on x86 Two small nits: - The package should probably throw a Requires: zlib and BuildRequires: zlib-devel in the spec file. - The upstream source lacks a copy of the license text. It would be nice if the upstream source could include this at some point, but is not required. I'm assuming David will fixup the zlib issues. After that is done, I consider this approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 2 00:24:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 May 2006 20:24:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190318] Review Request: perl-HTTP-Request-Params - Retrieve GET/POST Parameters from HTTP Requests In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605020024.k420O0P9012674@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-HTTP-Request-Params - Retrieve GET/POST Parameters from HTTP Requests https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190318 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |tibbs at math.uh.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 2 00:32:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 May 2006 20:32:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190318] Review Request: perl-HTTP-Request-Params - Retrieve GET/POST Parameters from HTTP Requests In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605020032.k420WIaS014398@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-HTTP-Request-Params - Retrieve GET/POST Parameters from HTTP Requests https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190318 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-05-01 20:32 EST ------- * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written, uses macros consistently and follows the Perl template. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. It's not included separately in the package, but this is not necessary as the upstream tarball does not include it. * source files match upstream: fccd255a2992c77b5c40cb5e1e75b256 HTTP-Request-Params-1.01.tar.gz fccd255a2992c77b5c40cb5e1e75b256 HTTP-Request-Params-1.01.tar.gz-srpm * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane. * no shared libraries are present. * package is not relocatable. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * %clean is present. * %check is present and all tests pass: All tests successful. Files=1, Tests=26, 1 wallclock secs ( 0.08 cusr + 0.02 csys = 0.10 CPU) * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no libtool .la droppings. * not a GUI app. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 2 00:48:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 May 2006 20:48:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190319] Review Request: perl-HTTP-Recorder - Record interaction with web sites In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605020048.k420mhLg018102@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-HTTP-Recorder - Record interaction with web sites https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190319 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |tibbs at math.uh.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 2 01:03:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 May 2006 21:03:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190362] Review Request: unifdef In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605020103.k42132tZ020850@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: unifdef https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190362 ------- Additional Comments From jpo at di.uminho.pt 2006-05-01 21:02 EST ------- David, Don't forget to update the changelog ... $ rpmlint /home/users/fedora/rpms/RPMS/i386/unifdef-1.171-3.i386.rpm W: unifdef incoherent-version-in-changelog 1.171-2 1.171-3 /jpo -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 2 01:08:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 May 2006 21:08:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190319] Review Request: perl-HTTP-Recorder - Record interaction with web sites In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605020108.k42189vQ022111@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-HTTP-Recorder - Record interaction with web sites https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190319 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-05-01 21:08 EST ------- * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written, uses macros consistently and follows the Perl specfile template. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. It's not included separately in the package, but this is not necessary as the upstream tarball does not include it. * source files match upstream: a2c167d06509620921e4d417ce9354a7 HTTP-Recorder-0.05.tar.gz a2c167d06509620921e4d417ce9354a7 HTTP-Recorder-0.05.tar.gz-srpm * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane. * no shared libraries are present. * package is not relocatable. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * %clean is present. * %check is present and all tests pass: All tests successful. Files=2, Tests=3, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.19 cusr + 0.06 csys = 0.25 CPU) * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no libtool .la droppings. * not a GUI app. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 2 01:09:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 May 2006 21:09:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190319] Review Request: perl-HTTP-Recorder - Record interaction with web sites In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605020109.k4219LnC022320@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-HTTP-Recorder - Record interaction with web sites https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190319 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-05-01 21:09 EST ------- Thanks for the article link, BTW. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 2 01:32:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 May 2006 21:32:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190396] Review Request: netpanzer - An Online Multiplayer Tactical Warfare Game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605020132.k421Wb6a027341@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: netpanzer - An Online Multiplayer Tactical Warfare Game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190396 ------- Additional Comments From andreas at bawue.net 2006-05-01 21:32 EST ------- Blockers: netpanzer non-standard-group Games and Entertainment Please also include the COPYING file as %doc, as required by the packaging guidelines. Suggestions: I'd suggest changing the Requires: netpanzer-data to netpanzer-data = %{version} That way, you will not have to update the -data file, when you rebuild the executable, thus saving bandwidth. Right now, it is depending by default on netpanzer-data = %{version}-%{release}. The netpanzer.xpm file is probably unnecessary, especially as the .png file is referring to the .png file. Good: * proper naming * spec file name matches %{name} * package meets packaging guidelines X License is GPL, License meets packaged COPYING * Spec file written in American English * Spec file is understandable * Package succesfully builds in mock on devel x86_64 and FC-5 x86 * No locales/shared libraries to worry about * No static/libtool files * Package not relocatable * Package owns all directories it creates * No duplicate files * Proper file permissions, proper %defattr(...) in spec file * Package contains code * No need for separate doc package * %doc files not needed for runtime * No header/other devel package files to worry about * Desktop File included and conforming to the desktop file packaging standard -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 2 01:47:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 May 2006 21:47:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190397] Review Request: netpanzer-data - Data files for netpanzer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605020147.k421l7RU031026@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: netpanzer-data - Data files for netpanzer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190397 andreas at bawue.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |190396 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From andreas at bawue.net 2006-05-01 21:46 EST ------- Good: * proper naming * spec file name matches %{name} * package meets packaging guidelines * License is GPL, License meets packaged COPYING * Spec file written in American English * Spec file is understandable * Package succesfully builds in mock on devel x86_64 and FC-5 x86 * No locales/shared libraries to worry about * No static/libtool files * Package not relocatable * Package owns all directories it creates * No duplicate files * Proper file permissions, proper %defattr(...) in spec file * Package contains necessary game-data for netpanzer, conforming to the Packaging Guidelines * No need for separate doc package * %doc files not needed for runtime * No header/other devel package files to worry about * Desktop File not needed * Package is correctly set to noarch. Approved, pending sponsorship and successfull review of #190396 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 2 01:47:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 May 2006 21:47:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190396] Review Request: netpanzer - An Online Multiplayer Tactical Warfare Game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605020147.k421lLDB031097@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: netpanzer - An Online Multiplayer Tactical Warfare Game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190396 andreas at bawue.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |190397 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 2 01:51:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 May 2006 21:51:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189184] Review Request: perl-Email-Valid - check validity of email addresses In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605020151.k421pHwt031977@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Email-Valid - check validity of email addresses https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189184 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-05-01 21:51 EST ------- I took another look at this and realized that it's probably best if the test suite is disabled; it requires network access which is a bad idea since the builder machines aren't even guaranteed to be on the Internet. I'm going to disable it in the spec and proceed with the review, but you should consider patching out the tests that require the network instead so there's at least a bit of test coverage. Issues: You'll need BuildRequires: Mail::Address (makefile complains about it not being there). Two of the files in the build package come out mode 444. The Perl specfile template contains a chmod line at the end of %install to fix these up. I'll approve if you fix these two issues. Review: * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. X specfile is properly named, is cleanly written, uses macros consistently. It's missing a bit from the suggested template which causes problems. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. It's not included separately in the package, but this is not necessary as the upstream tarball does not include it. * source files match upstream: 371b1552b81b93ffbf89cf2b1c1376c5 Email-Valid-0.15.tar.gz 371b1552b81b93ffbf89cf2b1c1376c5 Email-Valid-0.15.tar.gz-srpm * latest version is being packaged. X BuildRequires missing perl(Mail::Address). * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane. * no shared libraries are present. * package is not relocatable. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. X file permissions improper; some files are mode 444. * %clean is present. O %check is disabled; test suite requires network access. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no libtool .la droppings. * not a GUI app. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 2 02:15:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 May 2006 22:15:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 182463] Review Request: cairomm (C++ bindings for cairo) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605020215.k422F4W3004293@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cairomm (C++ bindings for cairo) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=182463 rvinyard at cs.nmsu.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 2 02:30:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 May 2006 22:30:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 183439] Review Request: papyrus (Canvas drawing library based on cairo/cairomm) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605020230.k422UFDj008486@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: papyrus (Canvas drawing library based on cairo/cairomm) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183439 ------- Additional Comments From rvinyard at cs.nmsu.edu 2006-05-01 22:30 EST ------- Michael (Peters), At the time I originally posted this review bug I did need a sponsor, but since then the cairomm package (which the papyrus canvas library needed as a dependency) has now gone through the process and Michael (Schwendt) sponsored it. At this point, I suppose all this needs is a review of the other dependency (idioskopos) and this canvas library. Fortunately, I think both are in good shape since all the packages I've submitted for review use the same autoconf spec template as cairomm did; so feedback on one resulted in improvements to all. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 2 02:56:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 May 2006 22:56:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190396] Review Request: netpanzer - An Online Multiplayer Tactical Warfare Game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605020256.k422udLb015818@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: netpanzer - An Online Multiplayer Tactical Warfare Game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190396 ------- Additional Comments From hugo at devin.com.br 2006-05-01 22:56 EST ------- Updated package: Spec URL: http://www.devin.com.br/eitch/rpm/fedora/SPECS/netpanzer.spec SRPM URL: http://www.devin.com.br/eitch/rpm/fedora/5/SRPMS/netpanzer-0.8-2.src.rpm Changes: - Changed Package's RPM Group - Fixed Changelog entries to specify versions - Stripped '\r' EOL from RELNOTES file - Added COPYING file -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 2 02:57:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 May 2006 22:57:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190397] Review Request: netpanzer-data - Data files for netpanzer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605020257.k422vQQW015996@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: netpanzer-data - Data files for netpanzer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190397 ------- Additional Comments From hugo at devin.com.br 2006-05-01 22:57 EST ------- Updated package: Spec URL: http://www.devin.com.br/eitch/rpm/fedora/SPECS/netpanzer-data.spec SRPM URL: http://www.devin.com.br/eitch/rpm/fedora/5/SRPMS/netpanzer-data-0.8-2.src.rpm Changes: - Changed Package's RPM Group - Fixed Changelog entries to specify versions - Stripped '\r' EOL from RELNOTES file -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 2 02:59:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 May 2006 22:59:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190247] Review Request: PyX - Python graphics package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605020259.k422xefV016590@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PyX - Python graphics package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190247 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-05-01 22:59 EST ------- This is much better. The package builds OK on i386 and x86_64 and rpmlint is silent. I understand about the manual; generally we name things the way they come from upstream, but in this case upstream isn't even versioned so you might not get what you expect when you fetch the file. Hopefully 177349 will be fixed one of these days and this issue will go away. I don't have a preference for fixing the shebang lines; If I were doing it I'd probably delete them, but the main goal here is to quiet rpmlint. I'm glad you were able to work around 150085 without sacrificing functionality. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 2 03:06:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 May 2006 23:06:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190396] Review Request: netpanzer - An Online Multiplayer Tactical Warfare Game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605020306.k4236EQf018376@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: netpanzer - An Online Multiplayer Tactical Warfare Game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190396 ------- Additional Comments From andreas at bawue.net 2006-05-01 23:06 EST ------- Thanks for updating the package with my suggestions as well as the other suggestions on IRC. Gonna take a look at the package tomorrow though. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 2 03:06:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 May 2006 23:06:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190397] Review Request: netpanzer-data - Data files for netpanzer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605020306.k4236wAv018597@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: netpanzer-data - Data files for netpanzer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190397 ------- Additional Comments From andreas at bawue.net 2006-05-01 23:06 EST ------- Thanks for updating the package with my suggestions as well as the other suggestions on IRC. Gonna take a look at the package tomorrow though. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 2 07:07:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 May 2006 03:07:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190213] Review Request: gq - Graphical LDAP directory browser and editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605020707.k42771hs005084@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gq - Graphical LDAP directory browser and editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190213 ------- Additional Comments From terjeros at phys.ntnu.no 2006-05-02 03:07 EST ------- > It would be a little easier to patch the current desktop file Done. -3 ready: Spec: http://www.pvv.ntnu.no/~terjeros/rpms/gq/gq.spec SRPM: http://www.pvv.ntnu.no/~terjeros/rpms/gq/gq-1.0.0-3.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 2 09:08:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 May 2006 05:08:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 169345] Review Request: SEC - Simple Event Correlator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605020908.k4298tOk007730@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: SEC - Simple Event Correlator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=169345 ------- Additional Comments From Didier.Moens at dmbr.UGent.be 2006-05-02 05:08 EST ------- Updated sec.init default runlevel http://www.dmbr.ugent.be/~didier/sec/sec-2.3.3-2.src.rpm http://www.dmbr.ugent.be/~didier/sec/sec.spec Comment #8 : - John, could you please pm me your .rpmlintrc ? With rpmlint-0.76, I do not get any of the above warnings/errors. - Source0 : I get a '404 Not found' on the suggested http://download.sourceforge.net/simple-evcorr/sec-2.3.3.tar.gz ; my proposed http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/simple-evcorr/sec-2.3.3.tar.gz does not yield any errors ... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 2 11:43:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 May 2006 07:43:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190213] Review Request: gq - Graphical LDAP directory browser and editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605021143.k42BhtmK017905@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gq - Graphical LDAP directory browser and editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190213 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-05-02 07:43 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > > It would be a little easier to patch the current desktop file > > Done. -3 ready: > > Spec: http://www.pvv.ntnu.no/~terjeros/rpms/gq/gq.spec > SRPM: http://www.pvv.ntnu.no/~terjeros/rpms/gq/gq-1.0.0-3.src.rpm Hmm, it seems that gq is back from the dead. I actually came to look at this review request with a view to seeing if you'd looked at lat (Bug #177580) as an alternative to gq, since gq was dead when I was looking for a GUI LDAP tool myself last year. I'll have to go and look at gq myself now ;-) Anyway, one quick comment on the spec: rather than using a specific mirror in the Source URLs, try using URLs like this: Source0: http://dl.sf.net/gqclient/gq-%{version}.tar.gz Not only will that potentially use any mirror, it's a bit shorter too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 2 12:25:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 May 2006 08:25:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 175127] Review Request: wavbreaker - Tool for splitting .wav files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605021225.k42CP5q8028479@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wavbreaker - Tool for splitting .wav files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175127 adrian at lisas.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From adrian at lisas.de 2006-05-02 08:24 EST ------- APPROVED go ahead and import it into CVS -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 2 12:30:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 May 2006 08:30:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190304] Review Request: mtd-utils In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605021230.k42CUYiQ029876@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mtd-utils https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190304 dwmw2 at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From dwmw2 at redhat.com 2006-05-02 08:30 EST ------- Added BuildRequires: zlib-devel Added COPYING (and also upstream from your git tree) Not added Requires: zlib since that's automatic. Imported and built. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 2 15:07:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 May 2006 11:07:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190450] New: Review Request: gtk-2.0 for FC5. Icon-theme-change not effecting gtkrc Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190450 Summary: Review Request: gtk-2.0 for FC5. Icon-theme-change not effecting gtkrc Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: svedurumudi at gmail.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: SRPM URL: Description: I noticed this problem after Evolution was not showing any icons. I have FC5 installed with KDE (no gnome). I then filed a bug with evolution (bugzilla.gnome.org), and was responded to verify the gtkrc. I then changed the default icon theme and (re)checked the file and found that the new theme was not updated in the file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 2 15:10:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 May 2006 11:10:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190450] Review Request: gtk-2.0 for FC5. Icon-theme-change not effecting gtkrc In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605021510.k42FATks007626@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtk-2.0 for FC5. Icon-theme-change not effecting gtkrc https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190450 svedurumudi at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|devel |fc5 Severity|normal |low Component|Package Review |themes-backgrounds-gnome -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 2 15:16:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 May 2006 11:16:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190450] Review Request: gtk-2.0 for FC5. Icon-theme-change not effecting gtkrc In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605021516.k42FGmaE009081@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtk-2.0 for FC5. Icon-theme-change not effecting gtkrc https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190450 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Core Component|themes-backgrounds-gnome |evolution ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2006-05-02 11:16 EST ------- This bug report is dirty like zebra. Putting it on the proper product. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 2 15:17:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 May 2006 11:17:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190450] Review Request: gtk-2.0 for FC5. Icon-theme-change not effecting gtkrc In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605021517.k42FHvst009367@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtk-2.0 for FC5. Icon-theme-change not effecting gtkrc https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190450 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |dmalcolm at redhat.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 2 15:39:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 May 2006 11:39:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187913] Review Request: mysql-query-browser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605021539.k42FdWC1015746@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mysql-query-browser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187913 ------- Additional Comments From imlinux at gmail.com 2006-05-02 11:39 EST ------- Can anyone else re-create this error? If not I'm going to wipe my 64 machine with a clean install and try it again. If it works I'm going to approve this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 2 15:46:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 May 2006 11:46:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189656] Review Request: lilypond - A typesetting system for music notation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605021546.k42Fk5bn018130@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lilypond - A typesetting system for music notation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189656 ------- Additional Comments From qspencer at ieee.org 2006-05-02 11:46 EST ------- You were right. With the correct permissions, the file is now automatically stripped. I've uploaded updated files: http://webpages.charter.net/qspencer/rpm/lilypond-2.8.1-3.src.rpm http://webpages.charter.net/qspencer/rpm/lilypond.spec As I noted earlier, I'm ignoring the "file-not-utf8" warning from rpmlint, and I'm also not going to deal with adding a desktop file for the time being. If you consider either of these important for approval, I'm willing to reconsider. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 2 16:49:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 May 2006 12:49:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189656] Review Request: lilypond - A typesetting system for music notation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605021649.k42GnW5w001010@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lilypond - A typesetting system for music notation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189656 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-05-02 12:49 EST ------- I just tried to build in mock and received this: ---- ERROR: Please install required programs: Python.h (python-devel, python-dev or libpython-dev package) See INSTALL.txt for more information on how to build LilyPond ---- I added BuildRequires: python-devel and got a bunch of errors, which I'll try to condense: ---- kpathsea: Running mktexfmt mf.base /usr/bin/mktexfmt: line 331: /usr/share/texmf/texconfig/tcfmgr: No such file or directory fmtutil: config file `fmtutil.cnf' not found. I can't find the base file `mf.base'! make[1]: *** [out/feta11.tfm] Error 1 ---- tcfgmgr is in tetex, so I added BR: tetex, but then I get to one I can't figure out: cat out/feta23.lisp \ out/parmesan23.lisp \ out/feta-alphabet23.lisp > out/feta23.otf-table cat out/feta26.lisp \ out/parmesan26.lisp \ out/feta-alphabet26.lisp > out/feta26.otf-table cat: out/parmesan23.lisp: No such file or directory make[1]: *** [out/feta23.otf-table] Error 1 make[1]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... make[1]: *** wait: No child processes. Stop. make: *** [all] Error 2 Full build log available on request. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 2 16:57:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 May 2006 12:57:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189656] Review Request: lilypond - A typesetting system for music notation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605021657.k42Gv7pM002419@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lilypond - A typesetting system for music notation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189656 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-05-02 12:56 EST ------- More oddness. On a hunch I disabled parallel make (which turns up lots of errors on an 8-CPU machine) and to: cat out/feta-braces-h.lisp \ \ > out/feta-braces-h.otf-table cat out/feta-braces-i.lisp \ \ > out/feta-braces-i.otf-table make[1]: *** No rule to make target `unknown/c059013l.pfb', needed by `out/CenturySchL-Ital.ttf'. Stop. make[1]: Leaving directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/lilypond-2.8.1/mf' make: *** [all] Error 2 error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.5626 (%build) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 2 17:47:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 May 2006 13:47:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 174898] Review Request: perl-HTML-FillInForm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605021747.k42Hl4IG013698@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-HTML-FillInForm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174898 mpeters at mac.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|mpeters at mac.com |bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info CC| |mpeters at mac.com OtherBugsDependingO|163779 |163776 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mpeters at mac.com 2006-05-02 13:46 EST ------- It's been almost 4 months now with no import. I don't see you in the owners.list (with this e-mail anyway) so I'm going to assume I took this bug by mistake (as in you need a sponsor, which I can't do). Kicking back to FE-NEW -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 2 18:14:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 May 2006 14:14:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189656] Review Request: lilypond - A typesetting system for music notation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605021814.k42IEdxl020915@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lilypond - A typesetting system for music notation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189656 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-05-02 14:14 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=128504) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=128504&action=view) Log from last failed build attempt -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 2 18:20:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 May 2006 14:20:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190471] New: Review Request: yakuake - Quake-style terminal emulator for KDE Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190471 Summary: Review Request: yakuake - Quake-style terminal emulator for KDE Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: hugo at devin.com.br QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.devin.com.br/eitch/rpm/fedora/SPECS/yakuake.spec SRPM URL: http://www.devin.com.br/eitch/rpm/fedora/5/SRPMS/yakuake-2.7.5-1.src.rpm Description: Yakuake is a Quake-style terminal emulator based on KDE Konsole technology. Its features includes a smoothly rolls down from the top of your screen, a tabbed interface, configurable dimensions and animation speeds, and more. This is related to bug #186283. The maintainer didn't respond for too long, so I made an update in the package for inclusion in FC5 extras, with a new version of the program. This is my third package here in Extras, so I think I'll need a sponsor for this one too :-) I dunno. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 2 18:59:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 May 2006 14:59:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190471] Review Request: yakuake - Quake-style terminal emulator for KDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605021859.k42Ix102003978@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: yakuake - Quake-style terminal emulator for KDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190471 gajownik at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |gajownik at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From gajownik at gmail.com 2006-05-02 14:58 EST ------- Hehe, I also wanted to take this package over ;) http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-extras-list/2006-April/msg00924.html I looked at your spec file - you missed BR gettext. Without it translations will not be built. Here's my spec file ? http://fedora.pl/~gajownik/yakuake.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 2 19:02:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 May 2006 15:02:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 178922] Review Request: asterisk - The Open Source PBX In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605021902.k42J2qGA005166@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: asterisk - The Open Source PBX https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=178922 dennis at ausil.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dennis at ausil.us ------- Additional Comments From dennis at ausil.us 2006-05-02 15:02 EST ------- Should the zaptel subpackage really obsolete the sqlite subpackage? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 2 19:05:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 May 2006 15:05:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189656] Review Request: lilypond - A typesetting system for music notation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605021905.k42J5F1E005945@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lilypond - A typesetting system for music notation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189656 ------- Additional Comments From qspencer at ieee.org 2006-05-02 15:05 EST ------- Thanks for the logs. It appears that the configure script looks for the location of some fonts using locate, and the default location is "unknown" if locate is not present. Fortunately, you can work around this with a configure option that specifies the directory. I have also disabled parallel builds in response to your report, although it may be worth testing them one more time. I've uploaded new files: http://webpages.charter.net/qspencer/rpm/lilypond.spec http://webpages.charter.net/qspencer/rpm/lilypond-2.8.1-4.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 2 19:19:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 May 2006 15:19:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190471] Review Request: yakuake - Quake-style terminal emulator for KDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605021919.k42JJmYD009862@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: yakuake - Quake-style terminal emulator for KDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190471 ------- Additional Comments From hugo at devin.com.br 2006-05-02 15:19 EST ------- Updated Package: Spec URL: http://www.devin.com.br/eitch/rpm/fedora/SPECS/yakuake.spec SRPM URL: http://www.devin.com.br/eitch/rpm/fedora/5/SRPMS/yakuake-2.7.5-1.src.rpm Added gettext to BuildRequires as pointed from Comment #1. Dawid Gajownik: Sorry, I didn't know about your package, as I searched in Bugzilla and Wiki and did not found anything. I'm new to Extras so I was looking for some packages to create/update/maintain. But since you "arrived" first, it's fair that you get this package (if you want :D). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 2 19:36:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 May 2006 15:36:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 178922] Review Request: asterisk - The Open Source PBX In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605021936.k42JaM6x016035@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: asterisk - The Open Source PBX https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=178922 ------- Additional Comments From jeff at ollie.clive.ia.us 2006-05-02 15:36 EST ------- (In reply to comment #42) > Should the zaptel subpackage really obsolete the sqlite subpackage? Oops, no that's a cut-n-pasto on my part. Updated Spec/SRPM: Spec Name or Url: http://www.ocjtech.us/asterisk-1.2.7.1-3.spec SRPM Name or Url: http://www.ocjtech.us/asterisk-1.2.7.1-3.src.rpm %changelog * Tue May 2 2006 Jeffrey C. Ollie - 1.2.7.1-6 - Zaptel subpackage shouldn't obsolete the sqlite subpackage. - Remove mISDN until build issues can be figured out. * Mon Apr 24 2006 Jeffrey C. Ollie - 1.2.7.1-5 - Build mISDN channel drivers, modelled after spec file from David Woodhouse * Thu Apr 20 2006 Jeffrey C. Ollie - 1.2.7.1-4 - Update chan_bluetooth patch with some additional information as to it's source and comment out more in the configuration file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 2 19:45:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 May 2006 15:45:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188369] Review Request: ctapi-cyberjack In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605021945.k42JjjlM018736@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ctapi-cyberjack https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188369 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-05-02 15:45 EST ------- (In reply to comment #37) > I think before I can work forwart we must found an global solution for CT-API in > Fedora. I agree, unfortunatly I don't have much (any?) time for that this week I'll try to take a look this weekend. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 2 20:02:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 May 2006 16:02:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189656] Review Request: lilypond - A typesetting system for music notation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605022002.k42K2XSj024093@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lilypond - A typesetting system for music notation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189656 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-05-02 16:02 EST ------- This is tough; now I'm getting a segfault: Initializing FontConfig... Rebuilding FontConfig cache /builddir/.rh-fontconfig/.fonts.cache-2. this may take a while... adding font directory: /builddir/build/BUILD/lilypond-2.8.1/out/share/lilypond/current/fonts/otf/ adding font directory: /builddir/build/BUILD/lilypond-2.8.1/out/share/lilypond/current/fonts/type1/Building font database. /bin/sh: line 1: 23617 Segmentation fault /builddir/build/BUILD/lilypond-2.8.1/lily/out/lilypond --verbose /builddir/build/BUILD/lilypond-2.8.1/ly/generate-documentation make[2]: *** [out/lilypond-internals.texi] Error 139 make[2]: Leaving directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/lilypond-2.8.1/Documentation/user' make[1]: *** [all] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/lilypond-2.8.1/Documentation' make: *** [all] Error 2 I'll try an i386 build. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 2 20:03:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 May 2006 16:03:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188180] Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605022003.k42K38g4024268@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188180 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |190483 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 2 20:08:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 May 2006 16:08:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190213] Review Request: gq - Graphical LDAP directory browser and editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605022008.k42K80GK025969@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gq - Graphical LDAP directory browser and editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190213 ------- Additional Comments From terjeros at phys.ntnu.no 2006-05-02 16:07 EST ------- > Anyway, one quick comment on the spec: rather than using a specific mirror in > the Source URLs, try using URLs like this: > > Source0: http://dl.sf.net/gqclient/gq-%{version}.tar.gz Sure, fixed. We are at -4: Spec: http://www.pvv.ntnu.no/~terjeros/rpms/gq/gq.spec SRPM: http://www.pvv.ntnu.no/~terjeros/rpms/gq/gq-1.0.0-4.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 2 20:18:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 May 2006 16:18:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190108] Review Request: perl-XML-SAX-Expat - SAX2 Driver for Expat (XML::Parser) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605022018.k42KIOMC029439@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-XML-SAX-Expat - SAX2 Driver for Expat (XML::Parser) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190108 orion at cora.nwra.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG OtherBugsDependingO|163776 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From orion at cora.nwra.com 2006-05-02 16:18 EST ------- Well, I thought this was a dependency of plplot's docbook build, but apparently not really. I'm closing as NOTABUG and withdraw the submission. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 2 20:25:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 May 2006 16:25:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189656] Review Request: lilypond - A typesetting system for music notation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605022025.k42KPH7d031119@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lilypond - A typesetting system for music notation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189656 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-05-02 16:25 EST ------- An i386 build segfaults as well, in the same place. This is all running on an x86_64 system; I'll try to get mock running on an i386 system just to make sure. Note that I can't try FC5 builds due to lack of mftrace in that repo. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 2 21:07:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 May 2006 17:07:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 181450] Review Request: clamav-exim - Clam AV support files for Exim In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605022107.k42L7C9e010552@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clamav-exim - Clam AV support files for Exim https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=181450 ------- Additional Comments From orion at cora.nwra.com 2006-05-02 17:07 EST ------- I think you should bail on using clamd-wrapper. Use it as a base for a new clamav-exim (or clamav-server-exim) script, but change it so you can use the expected naming conventions for the init and logrotate scripts. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 2 21:12:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 May 2006 17:12:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190493] New: Review Request: python-yaml Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190493 Summary: Review Request: python-yaml Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: mdehaan at redhat.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/misa/rpms/python-yaml/python-yaml.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/misa/rpms/python-yaml/python-yaml-0.3000.20060502-1.src.rpm Description: python-yaml is a packaging of Python YAML 3000, a YAML library for Python. I'm adding this because syck-python in Extras (or upstream syck, for that matter) doesn't have a dump() function (no serialization, so it's only half of a library) and this parser is more fully featured. It is also YAML 1.1 compliant as opposed to syck which only partially complies with YAML 1.0, and has some robustness issues in the C codebase. It's also a pure python module, which is also a plus for something as simple as YAML. dump() and load() have been manually tested and work, plus there is a suite of unit tests that have also been tested. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 3 00:14:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 May 2006 20:14:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187622] Review Request: cowbell In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605030014.k430EIxK025080@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cowbell https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187622 ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2006-05-02 20:14 EST ------- 0.2.7 builds but crashes when music is imported. Traced the problem to cowbell looking for libglib-2.0.so but on my system it is libglib-2.0.so.0 Symlinking it works, perhaps cowbell can be made to look there or glib2 made to provide a link. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 3 00:16:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 May 2006 20:16:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190502] New: Review Request: sportstracker Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190502 Summary: Review Request: sportstracker Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: bdpepple at ameritech.net QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://piedmont.homelinux.org/fedora/sportstracker/sportstracker.spec SRPM URL: http://piedmont.homelinux.org/fedora/sportstracker/sportstracker-1.2.1-1.src.rpm Description: SportsTracker is an application for people which want to record their sporting activities. It is not bound to a specific kind of sport, the user can create categories for all sport types which are endurance related, such as cycling, running or swimming. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 3 00:17:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 May 2006 20:17:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187622] Review Request: cowbell In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605030017.k430Hg6C026034@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cowbell https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187622 ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2006-05-02 20:17 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=128528) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=128528&action=view) spec patch Fairly trivial, bumps version to 0.2.7. Doesn't split of a devel subpackage, which may be necessary. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 3 00:18:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 May 2006 20:18:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190502] Review Request: sportstracker In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605030018.k430IDCi026124@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sportstracker https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190502 bdpepple at ameritech.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|devel |fc5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 3 04:03:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 May 2006 00:03:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187241] Review Request: mboxgrep - Displays e-mail messages matching a pattern In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605030403.k4343VCc014021@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mboxgrep - Displays e-mail messages matching a pattern https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187241 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|fedora-extras- |fedora-package- |list at redhat.com |review at redhat.com tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |tibbs at math.uh.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-05-03 00:03 EST ------- Not much to say, really. "BuildPrereq" needs to be changed to "BuildRequires"; this will quiet rpmlint. Since it's just a simple change, I'll go ahead and approve and you can fix it when you check in. Review: * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible; text is included in the package. * source files match upstream: 4b256de164b8f094db9ccf0e6386d246 mboxgrep-0.7.9.tar.gz 4b256de164b8f094db9ccf0e6386d246 mboxgrep-0.7.9.tar.gz-srpm * latest version is being packaged. X BuildPrereq is used instead BuildRequires, but the requirement are sane. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). X rpmlint complains of BuildPrereq use. * final provides and requires are sane. * no shared libraries are present. * package is not relocatable. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * %clean is present. O %check is not present; no test suite upstream. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * info files are present and installed correctly. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no libtool .la droppings. * not a GUI app. * scriptlets are sane. APPROVED; fix the BuildPrereq: thing when you check in. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 3 09:09:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 May 2006 05:09:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189783] Review Request: e17: The enlightenment DR17 window manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605030909.k4399foY011169@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: e17: The enlightenment DR17 window manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189783 ------- Additional Comments From che666 at gmail.com 2006-05-03 05:09 EST ------- i am probably extending my xdg menu generator to support e17... having menus in sync needs actual code to be written. note: theres currently no wm besides fluxbox (which uses my generator) that has menus generated according to the fdo specs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 3 09:18:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 May 2006 05:18:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187622] Review Request: cowbell In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605030918.k439Ik2A013198@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cowbell https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187622 ------- Additional Comments From foolish at guezz.net 2006-05-03 05:18 EST ------- Updated spec: http://folk.ntnu.no/sindrb/packages/cowbell.spec Updated SRPM: http://folk.ntnu.no/sindrb/packages/cowbell-0.2.7-1.src.rpm Does this build and run cleanly on x86_64 now? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 3 11:43:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 May 2006 07:43:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 183912] Review Request: jack-audio-connection-kit - The Jack Audio Connection Kit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605031143.k43Bhfj8012804@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jack-audio-connection-kit - The Jack Audio Connection Kit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183912 ------- Additional Comments From andy at smile.org.ua 2006-05-03 07:43 EST ------- I've fixed all described issues. Please, review last update at: ftp://andriy.asplinux.com.ua/pub/people/andy/extras/jack-audio-connection-kit-0. 101.1-5.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 3 13:50:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 May 2006 09:50:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190493] Review Request: python-yaml In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605031350.k43DoRNA009557@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-yaml https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190493 ------- Additional Comments From mdehaan at redhat.com 2006-05-03 09:50 EST ------- I should also add that this is my first package for FC Extras, so I'm seeking a sponsor. I'd appreciate it if anyone with sponsorship abilities could help me out! Thanks, Michael -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 3 13:56:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 May 2006 09:56:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187622] Review Request: cowbell In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605031356.k43Du3mO011580@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cowbell https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187622 ------- Additional Comments From bugs.michael at gmx.net 2006-05-03 09:55 EST ------- It should look for libglib-2.0.so.0 (not libglib-2.0.so which belongs into the glib2-devel package). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 3 14:26:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 May 2006 10:26:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188178] Review Request: gauche-gl - OpenGL binding for Gauche In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605031426.k43EQgX3019290@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gauche-gl - OpenGL binding for Gauche https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188178 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |tibbs at math.uh.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 3 14:26:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 May 2006 10:26:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188176] Review Request: gauche-gtk - Gauche extension module to use GTK In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605031426.k43EQwSP019349@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gauche-gtk - Gauche extension module to use GTK https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188176 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |tibbs at math.uh.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 3 17:08:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 May 2006 13:08:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189783] Review Request: e17: The enlightenment DR17 window manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605031708.k43H8ve6000757@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: e17: The enlightenment DR17 window manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189783 ------- Additional Comments From che666 at gmail.com 2006-05-03 13:08 EST ------- i just hacked up a new version of the menu gen. it has an additional helper application using inotify to monitor changes with the menu and spawn a regen of the menu once it happens (push system instead pull system). i also looked at the way e17 menus are done... its definitely possible to hack something up in quite short time. i will get back to you on irc if you are on later tonight ignacio. Starting to write a prototype this evening. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 3 17:13:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 May 2006 13:13:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187622] Review Request: cowbell In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605031713.k43HDveU002347@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cowbell https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187622 ------- Additional Comments From foolish at guezz.net 2006-05-03 13:13 EST ------- This has been pushed upstream, new release imminent. I'll update the spec accordingly as soon as the new release is out. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 3 17:48:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 May 2006 13:48:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188176] Review Request: gauche-gtk - Gauche extension module to use GTK In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605031748.k43HmQXS011396@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gauche-gtk - Gauche extension module to use GTK https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188176 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-05-03 13:48 EST ------- I'm getting a build failure in mock: checking for X... no configure: creating Gauche-gtk.gpd *** ERROR: Compile Error: can't find dlopen-able module "srfi-1-lib" "/usr/bin/gauche-package":37:(use srfi-1) Stack Trace: _______________________________________ This repeats with the same error a few times; I'll attach a build log. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 3 17:49:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 May 2006 13:49:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188176] Review Request: gauche-gtk - Gauche extension module to use GTK In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605031749.k43HnXlB011686@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gauche-gtk - Gauche extension module to use GTK https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188176 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-05-03 13:49 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=128549) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=128549&action=view) Log from failing build in mock (development, i386) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 3 18:44:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 May 2006 14:44:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188176] Review Request: gauche-gtk - Gauche extension module to use GTK In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605031844.k43Iiqj6029310@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gauche-gtk - Gauche extension module to use GTK https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188176 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-05-03 14:44 EST ------- Note, the failure is identical when building for FC5-i386, but is somewhat different when building for FC5-x86_64. There it seems to get fully through the configure phase and most of the way through compilation and then dies: /usr/bin/ld: gauche-gtk.o: relocation R_X86_64_32 against `a local symbol' can not be used when making a shared o bject; recompile with -fPIC gauche-gtk.o: could not read symbols: Bad value collect2: ld returned 1 exit status make[1]: *** [gauche-gtk.so] Error 1 None of these change when I turn of parallel make, BTW. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 3 19:04:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 May 2006 15:04:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190582] New: Review Request: perl-Module-ScanDeps - Recursively scan Perl code for dependencies Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190582 Summary: Review Request: perl-Module-ScanDeps - Recursively scan Perl code for dependencies Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: jpo at di.uminho.pt QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://gsd.di.uminho.pt/jpo/software/fedora/perl-Module-ScanDeps.spec SRPM URL: http://gsd.di.uminho.pt/jpo/software/fedora/perl-Module-ScanDeps-0.59-1.src.rpm Description: An application of Module::ScanDeps is to generate executables from scripts that contains necessary modules; this module supports two such projects, PAR and App::Packer. Please see their respective documentations on CPAN for further information. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 3 19:06:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 May 2006 15:06:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190583] New: Review Request: perl-Test-Differences - Test strings and data structures and show differences if not ok Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190583 Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-Differences - Test strings and data structures and show differences if not ok Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: jpo at di.uminho.pt QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://gsd.di.uminho.pt/jpo/software/fedora/perl-Test-Differences.spec SRPM URL: http://gsd.di.uminho.pt/jpo/software/fedora/perl-Test-Differences-0.47-1.src.rpm Description: When the code you're testing returns multiple lines, records or data structures and they're just plain wrong, an equivalent to the Unix diff utility may be just what's needed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 3 19:56:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 May 2006 15:56:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188461] Review Request: xmms-musepack - Mpegplus (mpc) playback plugin for XMMS In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605031956.k43JuFZn019955@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xmms-musepack - Mpegplus (mpc) playback plugin for XMMS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188461 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|fedora-extras- |fedora-package- |list at redhat.com |review at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From matthias at rpmforge.net 2006-05-03 15:56 EST ------- Replacing the make line with : %{__make} %{?_smp_mflags} CXXFLAGS="%{optflags}" Fixes those CXXFLAGS being set by the configure script. A patch to configure.ac + running autoconf seems overkill but would probably be cleanest. Opinions? Updated 1.2-2.1 spec file available from the same location : http://svn.rpmforge.net/svn/trunk/rpms/xmms-musepack/ (note that I will remove the 2 first lines and add %{?dist} to the final spec) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 3 20:02:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 May 2006 16:02:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187351] Review Request: bmpx - Media player with the WinAmp GUI In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605032002.k43K24nx021464@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bmpx - Media player with the WinAmp GUI https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187351 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|fedora-extras- |fedora-package- |list at redhat.com |review at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From matthias at rpmforge.net 2006-05-03 16:01 EST ------- > $ rpmqfcheck.pl /home/qa/tmp/rpm/RPMS/bmpx-0.14.3-1.fc5.i386.rpm > Orphaned dir: /usr/share/dbus-1 > Orphaned dir: /usr/share/locale/af > Orphaned dir: /usr/share/locale/af/LC_MESSAGES > Orphaned dir: /usr/share/locale/et Since /usr/share/dbus-1/services/ is owned by dbus, I think you've found a bug in dbus, which should own the /usr/share/dbus-1/ directory. The af and et directories should be owned by glibc-common if I'm not mistaken, as many other translations are already there too. Did you file these bugs already, or do you want me to do it? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 3 20:08:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 May 2006 16:08:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188462] Review Request: bmp-musepack - Mpegplus (mpc) playback plugin for BMP In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605032008.k43K8B4w023088@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bmp-musepack - Mpegplus (mpc) playback plugin for BMP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188462 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|fedora-extras- |fedora-package- |list at redhat.com |review at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From matthias at rpmforge.net 2006-05-03 16:07 EST ------- I've contacted the author about this issue. Thanks a lot for spotting it, as I thought I had some strange ape/id3 tag problem on the mpc files I was trying to open with that plugin... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 3 21:13:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 May 2006 17:13:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188430] Review Request: gtk+ In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605032113.k43LDAT4007047@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtk+ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188430 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2006-05-03 17:12 EST ------- Looks ok to me, just one final clarification: The no-undefined patch is there just to help ensure that no undefined non-weak symbols sneak out in the libs later? The gtkgdkdep patch already results in libgtk being linked with libgdk and takes care of them in this case, no? FWIW, in case you didn't notice, glib has some undefined symbols as well in libgmodule-1.2.so.0.0.10 and libgthread-1.2.so.0.0.10. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 3 22:29:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 May 2006 18:29:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188176] Review Request: gauche-gtk - Gauche extension module to use GTK In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605032229.k43MT36i026224@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gauche-gtk - Gauche extension module to use GTK https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188176 ------- Additional Comments From gemi at bluewin.ch 2006-05-03 18:28 EST ------- The failure on i386 is due to inconsistent naming of the arch directory in gauche, there are both i386-redhat-linux-gnu and i686-redhat-linux-gnu, so that the so files could not be found. I patched gauche, so that the both are the same. This problem doesn't occur on x86_64. The problem you reported is probably not from gauche but from gauche-gtk itself. I will look at it, probably missing -fPIC when compiling the sources, just as the error message says. Gauche is being rebuild. Please check it out as soon as it gets to the repositories and try the following: - start gosh - enter "(use srfi-1)" this should now return # and no error any more. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 4 00:08:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 May 2006 20:08:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 180571] Review Request: puppet In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605040008.k4408J0u013813@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: puppet https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=180571 ------- Additional Comments From dlutter at redhat.com 2006-05-03 20:08 EST ------- * Updated to latest upstream release 0.16.5 Spec: http://people.redhat.com/dlutter/yum/spec/puppet.spec SRPM: http://people.redhat.com/dlutter/yum/SRPMS/puppet-0.16.5-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 4 00:08:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 May 2006 20:08:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188482] Review Request: scipy-0.4.8 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605040008.k4408kWk013908@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scipy-0.4.8 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188482 ------- Additional Comments From ndbecker2 at verizon.net 2006-05-03 20:08 EST ------- OK, I have uploaded scipy-0.4.8-2. I have tried to address the comments. I did not use mach, because the setup looks a bit involved. I did try to supply requires and buildrequires manually. I did run rpmlint. There are some complaints, but I think they are ignorable. I removed d1mach patch. If you have the latest FC5 gcc I think the bug has been fixed. Is it safe to assume nobody will try to use older gcc? http://nbecker.dyndns.org:8080/scipy.spec http://nbecker.dyndns.org:8080/scipy-0.4.8-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 4 03:15:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 May 2006 23:15:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187241] Review Request: mboxgrep - Displays e-mail messages matching a pattern In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605040315.k443FVTZ021031@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mboxgrep - Displays e-mail messages matching a pattern https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187241 andreas at bawue.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From andreas at bawue.net 2006-05-03 23:15 EST ------- Thx for the review -> NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 4 03:17:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 May 2006 23:17:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 181831] Review Request: bitbake - Build Tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605040317.k443H92x021494@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bitbake - Build Tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=181831 andreas at bawue.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |UPSTREAM ------- Additional Comments From andreas at bawue.net 2006-05-03 23:17 EST ------- Thx for the review. -> NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 4 03:38:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 May 2006 23:38:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190396] Review Request: netpanzer - An Online Multiplayer Tactical Warfare Game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605040338.k443cOA9027770@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: netpanzer - An Online Multiplayer Tactical Warfare Game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190396 andreas at bawue.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From andreas at bawue.net 2006-05-03 23:38 EST ------- Looking good. The License is included, The Group is fixed and rpmlint is clean. APROVED. However, you'll still need someone to sponsor your account. I can't do it. Sorry. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 4 04:00:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 May 2006 00:00:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189197] Review Request: ghc-gtk2hs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605040400.k4440n0S001391@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ghc-gtk2hs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189197 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2006-05-04 00:00 EST ------- (In reply to comment #8) > I find it a little annoying that the doc directories are: > ghc642-gtk-0.9.10 > ghc-gtk2hs-doc-0.9.10 > More consistent would be: > ghc-gtk2hs-0.9.10 > ghc-gtk2hs-doc-0.9.10 [Hmm, the situation with ghc is actually similar: html under ghc-6.4.2/ and doc files in ghc642-6.4.2/.] I might be more tempted to just put all the doc files under ghc-gtk2hs-0.9.10/ irrespective of the subpackage they are in (or even gtk2hs-0.9.10/: see below). The reason those doc files are in ghc642-gtk is more of a historical artefact: ghc642-gtk used to be the main ghc642-gtk2hs package and then there were other subpackages like ghc642-gtk2hs-gconf etc. I moved ChangeLog and TODO to the -doc subpackage for now anyway, and AUTHORS and COPYING.LIB to -glib. > This would mean, that the doc files would go in the ghc-gtk2hs-0.9.10 > package which is currently. Is is possible however to install the > subpackages without the main package. Probably one could make > the package ghc642-gtk require ghc-gtk2hs, so that ghc-gtk2hs is always > installed. Hmm, but that then introduces a circular dependency which I think is frowned upon in Fedora packaging circles. I noticed that ChangeLog file is quite big btw: perhaps it should be gzip'ed or just not included? My only concern now with the current package naming (ghc-gtk2hs) is: what happens if/when one day we want to build/package gtk2hs with another Haskell compiler or interpreter (say nhc98, jhc or hugs)? In that sense using a more generic name for the source package (eg just gtk2hs) might be better after all? (We can still have a ghc-gtk2hs subpackage of course even in this case.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 4 08:34:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 May 2006 04:34:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187351] Review Request: bmpx - Media player with the WinAmp GUI In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605040834.k448Y38O027486@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bmpx - Media player with the WinAmp GUI https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187351 ------- Additional Comments From bugs.michael at gmx.net 2006-05-04 04:33 EST ------- I haven't filed them. Btw, glibc-common does not include plain "af" and "et" locales at all. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 4 09:01:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 May 2006 05:01:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187351] Review Request: bmpx - Media player with the WinAmp GUI In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605040901.k4491sHI002186@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bmpx - Media player with the WinAmp GUI https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187351 ------- Additional Comments From matthias at rpmforge.net 2006-05-04 05:01 EST ------- Looking further at all the other directories under /usr/share/locale/, I'm really not sure what the consensus is, as MANY aren't owned by any package. Probably a subject for the packaging-list before any bug gets filed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 4 11:06:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 May 2006 07:06:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190139] Review Request: rapidsvn - Graphical interface for the Subversion version-control system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605041106.k44B61MS031773@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rapidsvn - Graphical interface for the Subversion version-control system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190139 ------- Additional Comments From rpm at timj.co.uk 2006-05-04 07:05 EST ------- OK, I've added the libtool fix. Thanks very much for all your investigation work on this unusual problem, Jason. Can you give the following a go? New spec/SRPM: Spec URL: http://www.timj.co.uk/linux/specs/rapidsvn.spec SRPM URL: http://www.timj.co.uk/linux/srpms/rapidsvn-0.9.1-3.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 4 11:25:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 May 2006 07:25:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190664] New: Review Request: keyutils - Kernel key management userspace utilities Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190664 Summary: Review Request: keyutils - Kernel key management userspace utilities Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: dhowells at redhat.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/~dhowells/keyutils/keyutils-1.0-2.fc5/keyutils.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/~dhowells/keyutils/keyutils-1.0-2.fc5/keyutils-1.0-2.fc5.src.rpm Description: This package provides userspace utility programs to allow the user to manipulate the kernel key management facility. Libraries are provided so that other userspace programs may use the facility as well. The binaries need to go in /bin, /sbin and /lib so that they can be used to authorise/authenticate the mounting of /usr. This package is included as part of RHEL-4 and has been tested there. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 4 11:37:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 May 2006 07:37:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190247] Review Request: PyX - Python graphics package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605041137.k44BbATh007164@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PyX - Python graphics package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190247 mpeters at mac.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From mpeters at mac.com 2006-05-04 07:37 EST ------- Been through build system for FC-4/FC-5 fails on devel due to broken devel build system http://buildsys.fedoraproject.org/logs/fedora-development-extras/8816-PyX-0.8.1-4.fc6/ppc/root.log http://buildsys.fedoraproject.org/logs/fedora-development-extras/8816-PyX-0.8.1-4.fc6/x86_64/root.log closing as next-release, I'll recue for devel when I've seen other compiled packages get through devel build system. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 4 12:10:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 May 2006 08:10:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190664] Review Request: keyutils - Kernel key management userspace utilities In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605041210.k44CAq0b015685@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: keyutils - Kernel key management userspace utilities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190664 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2006-05-04 08:10 EST ------- Before we can continue, please fix these issues: # rpmlint keyutils-*.rpm W: keyutils no-url-tag E: keyutils standard-dir-owned-by-package /usr/share/man/man5 E: keyutils standard-dir-owned-by-package /usr/share/man/man8 E: keyutils executable-marked-as-config-file /etc/request-key.conf E: keyutils script-without-shellbang /etc/request-key.conf E: keyutils standard-dir-owned-by-package /usr/share/man/man1 W: keyutils-debuginfo no-url-tag W: keyutils-devel no-dependency-on keyutils W: keyutils-devel no-url-tag W: keyutils-devel no-documentation E: keyutils-devel script-without-shellbang /usr/include/keyutils.h W: keyutils-libs no-url-tag Besides these, the follow issues caught my eye: * Unowned directory: /usr/share/keyutils * BuildRoot not conforming to FE guidelines * Why this (IMO weird) library naming? /lib/libkeyutils-1.0.2.*.so /lib/libkeyutils.so.1 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 4 12:15:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 May 2006 08:15:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190315] Review Request: perl-Email-MIME - Easy MIME message parsing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605041215.k44CFA6s016672@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Email-MIME - Easy MIME message parsing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190315 jpo at di.uminho.pt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From jpo at di.uminho.pt 2006-05-04 08:15 EST ------- Thanks for the review. Imported and built for FC-4, FC-5, and devel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 4 12:15:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 May 2006 08:15:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190316] Review Request: perl-Email-MIME-Modifier - Modify Email::MIME Objects Easily In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605041215.k44CFYWM016810@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Email-MIME-Modifier - Modify Email::MIME Objects Easily https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190316 Bug 190316 depends on bug 190315, which changed state. Bug 190315 Summary: Review Request: perl-Email-MIME - Easy MIME message parsing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190315 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 4 12:15:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 May 2006 08:15:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190316] Review Request: perl-Email-MIME-Modifier - Modify Email::MIME Objects Easily In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605041215.k44CFpuw016875@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Email-MIME-Modifier - Modify Email::MIME Objects Easily https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190316 jpo at di.uminho.pt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From jpo at di.uminho.pt 2006-05-04 08:15 EST ------- Thanks for the review. Imported and built for FC-4, FC-5, and devel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 4 12:16:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 May 2006 08:16:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190318] Review Request: perl-HTTP-Request-Params - Retrieve GET/POST Parameters from HTTP Requests In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605041216.k44CG5Yx016972@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-HTTP-Request-Params - Retrieve GET/POST Parameters from HTTP Requests https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190318 Bug 190318 depends on bug 190316, which changed state. Bug 190316 Summary: Review Request: perl-Email-MIME-Modifier - Modify Email::MIME Objects Easily https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190316 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 4 12:16:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 May 2006 08:16:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190318] Review Request: perl-HTTP-Request-Params - Retrieve GET/POST Parameters from HTTP Requests In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605041216.k44CGeKD017121@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-HTTP-Request-Params - Retrieve GET/POST Parameters from HTTP Requests https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190318 jpo at di.uminho.pt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From jpo at di.uminho.pt 2006-05-04 08:16 EST ------- Thanks for the review. Imported and built for FC-4, FC-5, and devel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 4 12:17:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 May 2006 08:17:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190319] Review Request: perl-HTTP-Recorder - Record interaction with web sites In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605041217.k44CH1ZU017160@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-HTTP-Recorder - Record interaction with web sites https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190319 Bug 190319 depends on bug 190318, which changed state. Bug 190318 Summary: Review Request: perl-HTTP-Request-Params - Retrieve GET/POST Parameters from HTTP Requests https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190318 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 4 12:26:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 May 2006 08:26:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190319] Review Request: perl-HTTP-Recorder - Record interaction with web sites In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605041226.k44CQhYD019298@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-HTTP-Recorder - Record interaction with web sites https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190319 jpo at di.uminho.pt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From jpo at di.uminho.pt 2006-05-04 08:26 EST ------- Thanks for the review. Imported and built for FC-4, FC-5, and devel. (In reply to comment #2) > Thanks for the article link, BTW. This is a very interesting module. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 4 12:39:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 May 2006 08:39:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188430] Review Request: gtk+ In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605041239.k44CdwJK023569@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtk+ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188430 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-05-04 08:39 EST ------- Re: no-undefined patch. You're right. It's just to guarantee no future goofs. Re: glib undefined symbols... hmm... I thought I had checked that, but it appears I only checked libglib, not the others. Should be easy enough to fix. Are we a go here then (APPROVED)? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 4 14:09:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 May 2006 10:09:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190493] Review Request: python-yaml In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605041409.k44E96FL020858@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-yaml https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190493 ------- Additional Comments From mdehaan at redhat.com 2006-05-04 10:08 EST ------- For what it's worth, Jeff Johnson has mentioned here that he has already packaged PySyck, which could also be an option for getting Python to have a decent YAML library that works. We could package both, or just PySyck. Doesn't matter much to me. Details are in comments here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189281 One issue from the author of PyYaml 3000 today was that it does YAML 1.1, but not 1.0 ... for interoperability this may point to PySyck making a bit more sense for cases where multiple languages want to get at the YAML data (interop with Ruby until it has a 1.1 parser, for instance). Personally I am interested in mainly using Yaml to store state in single applications so this doesn't concern me a whole lot, but it could affect other folks quite a bit -- and I'd like to make sure that use case is covered. (Especially Python/Ruby interoperability). So, if there is a bugzilla on including PySyck, I'd just assume get behind that one if it's easier. A working YAML implementation is better than none at all, and per https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189281 we currently don't have a working option. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 4 14:33:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 May 2006 10:33:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190396] Review Request: netpanzer - An Online Multiplayer Tactical Warfare Game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605041433.k44EX1k0027225@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: netpanzer - An Online Multiplayer Tactical Warfare Game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190396 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|andreas at bawue.net |j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl OtherBugsDependingO|163779 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-05-04 10:32 EST ------- I can sponsor and you seem worthy of sponsering concedering your quick and correct reactions to this review and your other opensource and Fedora (translation / writing) work. Dropping this back to FE-REVIEW and assigning to me. I'll do a quick Re-review just to make sure. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 4 14:56:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 May 2006 10:56:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190397] Review Request: netpanzer-data - Data files for netpanzer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605041456.k44Eunti003641@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: netpanzer-data - Data files for netpanzer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190397 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|andreas at bawue.net |j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-05-04 10:56 EST ------- I can sponsor and you seem worthy of sponsering concedering your quick and correct reactions to this review and your other opensource and Fedora (translation / writing) work. Assigning to me. I'll do a Review as time permits. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 4 15:11:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 May 2006 11:11:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190396] Review Request: netpanzer - An Online Multiplayer Tactical Warfare Game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605041511.k44FBJm5008563@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: netpanzer - An Online Multiplayer Tactical Warfare Game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190396 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |andreas at bawue.net ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-05-04 11:11 EST ------- Looking good, the icon installation however is not according to the freedesktop.org standard. Please mv netpanzer.png to: $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/icons/hicolor/48x48/apps at the end of %install and update %files accordingly. You should then also add the following scripts to update the icon cache: %post touch --no-create %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor || : if [ -x %{_bindir}/gtk-update-icon-cache ]; then %{_bindir}/gtk-update-icon-cache --quiet %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor || : fi %postun touch --no-create %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor || : if [ -x %{_bindir}/gtk-update-icon-cache ]; then %{_bindir}/gtk-update-icon-cache --quiet %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor || : fi These script are described in: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/ScriptletSnippets#head-fc74f078205565f961f6d836b77c3428619c689d -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 4 15:35:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 May 2006 11:35:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188178] Review Request: gauche-gl - OpenGL binding for Gauche In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605041535.k44FZmtx016874@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gauche-gl - OpenGL binding for Gauche https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188178 ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at ameritech.net 2006-05-04 11:35 EST ------- Couple of quick notes: 1. You have ownership problems with the %{_infodir}. 2. Bunch of unnecessary BuildRequires: libGL-devel (by freeglut-devel), libGLU-devel (by freeglut-devel), libICE-devel (by libSM-devel), libX11-devel (by libXext-devel) 3. Requires for install-info should probably follow the scriptlet example from the wiki. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/ScriptletSnippets#head-117e9450bc166ceb4251bf8d87a9dd4e862442a4 4. Requires for gauche is unnecessry, since the devel package soname should pull this in. 5. I'd drop the VERSION & README docs, since they don't provide any useful information. If I've got some time later today, I'll try to do a more thorough review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 4 15:42:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 May 2006 11:42:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188430] Review Request: gtk+ In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605041542.k44FgKWx019367@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtk+ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188430 ville.skytta at iki.fi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |ville.skytta at iki.fi OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2006-05-04 11:42 EST ------- Yep, approved, I just wanted to make sure I understand what the no-undefined patch is for. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 4 15:45:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 May 2006 11:45:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188178] Review Request: gauche-gl - OpenGL binding for Gauche In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605041545.k44FjU8h020653@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gauche-gl - OpenGL binding for Gauche https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188178 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-05-04 11:45 EST ------- I was originally planning on doing both of these, but the problems with gauche-gtk necessitating a gauche update and the devel repo being busted set me back. You're certainly welcome to take this if you like. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 4 15:49:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 May 2006 11:49:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187351] Review Request: bmpx - Media player with the WinAmp GUI In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605041549.k44FnU54021761@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bmpx - Media player with the WinAmp GUI https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187351 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2006-05-04 11:49 EST ------- IMO %find_lang or the glibc-common are things that should be looked into, they're things that could provide a centralized fix for unowned locale dirs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 4 16:12:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 May 2006 12:12:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187243] Review Request: lazarus : IDE and RAD tool for the free pascal compiler (fpc) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605041612.k44GCLBs026871@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lazarus : IDE and RAD tool for the free pascal compiler (fpc) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187243 ------- Additional Comments From joost at cnoc.nl 2006-05-04 12:12 EST ------- I've updated the package to upstream version 0.9.14-1 and also changed the download-url Spec: http://www.cnoc.nl/fpc/lazarus.spec SPRM: http://www.cnoc.nl/fpc/lazarus-0.9.14-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 4 16:25:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 May 2006 12:25:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190705] New: Review Request: perl-Test-Base Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190705 Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-Base Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: steve at silug.org QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://ftp.kspei.com/pub/steve/rpms/perl-Test-Base/perl-Test-Base.spec SRPM URL: http://ftp.kspei.com/pub/steve/rpms/perl-Test-Base-0.50-1.src.rpm Description: Testing is usually the ugly part of Perl module authoring. Perl gives you a standard way to run tests with Test::Harness, and basic testing primitives with Test::More. After that you are pretty much on your own to develop a testing framework and philosophy. Test::More encourages you to make your own framework by subclassing Test::Builder, but that is not trivial. (This is a build requirement for the new version of perl-YAML currently in devel CVS.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 4 16:27:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 May 2006 12:27:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190705] Review Request: perl-Test-Base In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605041627.k44GRAPL030687@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-Base https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190705 ------- Additional Comments From steve at silug.org 2006-05-04 12:26 EST ------- Hold off reviewing this one for a bit... It requires Module::Install, which in turn requires a whole stack of modules. I'll be submitting that stack ASAP. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 4 16:34:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 May 2006 12:34:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189080] Review Request: perl-Module-Info In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605041634.k44GYaNv000497@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Module-Info https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189080 ------- Additional Comments From jpo at di.uminho.pt 2006-05-04 12:34 EST ------- Steven, Please see comment 3. jpo -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 4 16:44:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 May 2006 12:44:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189080] Review Request: perl-Module-Info In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605041644.k44Gio1X003573@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Module-Info https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189080 ------- Additional Comments From steve at silug.org 2006-05-04 12:44 EST ------- Thanks. I should be getting back to this over the weekend at the latest. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 4 16:53:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 May 2006 12:53:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188430] Review Request: gtk+ In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605041653.k44GrPWu005567@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtk+ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188430 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-05-04 12:53 EST ------- Thanks, imported (build pending buildsys/devel working again). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 4 17:23:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 May 2006 13:23:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189824] Review Request: lasi - C++ library for creating Postscript documents In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605041723.k44HNtpm013519@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lasi - C++ library for creating Postscript documents https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189824 ------- Additional Comments From orion at cora.nwra.com 2006-05-04 13:23 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > 1. The doc directory properly belong in the -devel package, since > it is API documentation. Done. > 2. In %description I would use LASi instead of libLASi since that > is the name. Done. > 3. The -devel package needs Requires: pango-devel and freetype-devel > These are included in LASi.h Added pango-devel, which in turn requires freetype-devel. Updated to 1.0.5 which fixes several issues. http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/lasi-1.0.5-1.fc5.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 4 17:53:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 May 2006 13:53:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190000] Review Request: partimage In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605041753.k44HrRUB022515@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: partimage https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190000 ------- Additional Comments From dcantrel at redhat.com 2006-05-04 13:53 EST ------- (In reply to comment #6) > Bad: > - Buildroot should be %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) Corrected. > - Server requires should probably be %{name} = %{version}-%{release} Had that originally. Changed back. > - Doesn't build on x86_64: Does now. > rpmlint isn't very happy w/ the 32bit package either. Well, it should quit being so pedantic. > W: partimage conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/pam.d/partimage > W: partimage conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/security/console.apps/partimage Added noreplace. > E: partimage use-old-pam-stack /etc/pam.d/partimage > E: partimage use-old-pam-stack /etc/pam.d/partimage Corrected. > W: partimage-server conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/logrotate.d/partimaged > W: partimage-server conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/pam.d/partimaged > W: partimage-server conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/rc.d/init.d/partimaged Added noreplace. > E: partimage-server non-readable /etc/partimaged/partimagedusers 0600 Corrected. > E: partimage-server executable-marked-as-config-file /etc/rc.d/init.d/partimaged Not marking it as a config file. > E: partimage-server incoherent-logrotate-file /etc/logrotate.d/partimaged Corrected. > W: partimage-server file-not-in-%lang /usr/share/man/en/man5/partimagedusers.5.gz > W: partimage-server file-not-in-%lang /usr/share/man/en/man8/partimaged.8.gz Corrected. > W: partimage-server incoherent-subsys /etc/rc.d/init.d/partimaged $prog > W: partimage-server incoherent-init-script-name partimaged Corrected. > E: partimage-server use-old-pam-stack /etc/pam.d/partimaged > E: partimage-server use-old-pam-stack /etc/pam.d/partimaged > E: partimage-server use-old-pam-stack /etc/pam.d/partimaged Corrected. > Indifferent: > - %description is a bit long winded... Removed last two paragraphs. People don't read anyway. > - chmod of pam.d/partimaged followed by install -m seems redundant. Look more closely. There are two pam.d files: partimage and partimaged. One I have to change the SYSCONFDIR in during installation, so I use sed and chmod. The other I can install directly, so I use install. > NEEDSWORK Grade me again, TA. Package and spec file can be found at http://people.redhat.com/dcantrel/core/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 4 18:11:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 May 2006 14:11:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 186327] Review Request: tcltls In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605041811.k44IBo9p027808@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tcltls https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=186327 wart at kobold.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|Jochen at herr-schmitt.de |bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2006-05-04 14:11 EST ------- Unassigning bug since the reviewer can't sponsor. This will let sponsors know that it's up for grabs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 4 18:12:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 May 2006 14:12:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190396] Review Request: netpanzer - An Online Multiplayer Tactical Warfare Game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605041812.k44ICKpB027928@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: netpanzer - An Online Multiplayer Tactical Warfare Game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190396 ------- Additional Comments From hugo at devin.com.br 2006-05-04 14:12 EST ------- Updated package: Spec URL: http://www.devin.com.br/eitch/rpm/fedora/SPECS/netpanzer.spec SRPM URL: http://www.devin.com.br/eitch/rpm/fedora/5/SRPMS/netpanzer-0.8-3.src.rpm Changes: - Changed netpanzer.png to comply with freedesktop.org standards. - Added scripts to update the icon cache after installing Notes: Thanks for the support Hans de Goede. I updated the packages with your notes from Comment #6. I now know about the freedesktop standard :-) If you have any notes, just say and I'll update it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 4 18:26:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 May 2006 14:26:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190144] Review Request: hevea - LaTeX to HTML translator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605041826.k44IQCda000670@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hevea - LaTeX to HTML translator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190144 andreas at bawue.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |NEW Keywords| |Reopened Resolution|NEXTRELEASE | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 4 18:27:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 May 2006 14:27:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190144] Review Request: hevea - LaTeX to HTML translator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605041827.k44IRmRS001241@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hevea - LaTeX to HTML translator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190144 andreas at bawue.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|mpeters at mac.com |andreas at bawue.net ------- Additional Comments From andreas at bawue.net 2006-05-04 14:27 EST ------- Reopening as the package was approved but the (nonpackaged) doc issue is still standing. Assigning back to me for now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 4 18:37:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 May 2006 14:37:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190267] Review Request: raidem-music - Background music for the game raidem In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605041837.k44Iblxa005318@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: raidem-music - Background music for the game raidem https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190267 wart at kobold.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2006-05-04 14:37 EST ------- FESCo approved a packaging guideline change to clarify this issue. APPROVED (again :) ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 4 19:27:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 May 2006 15:27:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190664] Review Request: keyutils - Kernel key management userspace utilities In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605041927.k44JRDoL020719@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: keyutils - Kernel key management userspace utilities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190664 ------- Additional Comments From dhowells at redhat.com 2006-05-04 15:27 EST ------- I've put a new SPEC and SRPM up for download: SPEC URL: http://people.redhat.com/~dhowells/keyutils/keyutils-1.1-1/keyutils.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/~dhowells/keyutils/keyutils-1.1-1/keyutils-1.1-1.src.rpm This should fix everything barring the "weird" library naming - with that, I followed the Ulrich Drepper guide to library naming. Btw, did you mean a literal '*' in the name of a library? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 4 19:55:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 May 2006 15:55:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189727] Review Request: Scribes In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605041955.k44Jt3XX028495@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Scribes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189727 bdpepple at ameritech.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |bdpepple at ameritech.net OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 4 19:58:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 May 2006 15:58:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190396] Review Request: netpanzer - An Online Multiplayer Tactical Warfare Game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605041958.k44JwIRO029268@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: netpanzer - An Online Multiplayer Tactical Warfare Game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190396 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-05-04 15:58 EST ------- Looking good -> Approved! Go create yourself an account as described here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/Contributors#head-a89c07b5b8abe7748b6b39f0f89768d595234907 Follow all the steps there, don't forget signing the CLA! (or other steps) once thats done I'll get a mail that you're awaiting sponsorship and I'll sponsor you. While waiting for me sponsoring you you can install the client-side plague (thats the FE buildsystem) tools and setup your CVS environment variables. These are the next steps as described on: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/Contributors After that import your package, tag it and request your first build :) Don't be alarmed if the build fails with some missing gcc deps, rawhide and thus the devel tree (where are initial imports are done) is broken atm. Once your build has succeeded don't forget to close this bug with a resolution of nextrelease. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 4 20:25:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 May 2006 16:25:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190396] Review Request: netpanzer - An Online Multiplayer Tactical Warfare Game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605042025.k44KPAq7004839@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: netpanzer - An Online Multiplayer Tactical Warfare Game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190396 ------- Additional Comments From hugo at devin.com.br 2006-05-04 16:24 EST ------- Hi Hans, I already have an account in Fedora Accounts System. My username is 'eitch' and I joined the 'cvsextras' group. Thanks for the support :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 4 20:27:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 May 2006 16:27:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190139] Review Request: rapidsvn - Graphical interface for the Subversion version-control system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605042027.k44KRkFY005589@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rapidsvn - Graphical interface for the Subversion version-control system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190139 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-05-04 16:27 EST ------- OK, with the libtool fix everything is fixed. Rawhide is broken at the moment so no development x86_64 builds (keep that in mind when you check in). So, to recap the initial issues: X license field matches the actual license. Fixed. X license is open source-compatible and included upstream but is not included in the package. Fixed. X package fails to build in mock (development, x86_64). Fixed (bulds properly; not your fault rawhide is busted) X rpmlint is silent. It's been quieted. X shared libraries are present; ldconfig should be called but isn't. ldconfig is called properly. X headers present in main package. Headers have been moved off to a -devel subpackage. I have no remaining objections. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 4 20:46:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 May 2006 16:46:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190396] Review Request: netpanzer - An Online Multiplayer Tactical Warfare Game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605042046.k44Kk0en010723@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: netpanzer - An Online Multiplayer Tactical Warfare Game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190396 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-05-04 16:45 EST ------- I've just sponsored you, you should have CVS access now, but don't know how long it takes for the system to pick this up. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 4 21:02:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 May 2006 17:02:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190397] Review Request: netpanzer-data - Data files for netpanzer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605042102.k44L2GhA014379@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: netpanzer-data - Data files for netpanzer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190397 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-05-04 17:02 EST ------- I'll keep my review short (again) as Andreas has already done most of the work. I only see 1 problem, why all the BuildReqs? I see no need for desktop-file-utils and most of the others seem superficial too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 4 21:09:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 May 2006 17:09:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190397] Review Request: netpanzer-data - Data files for netpanzer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605042109.k44L98uV016126@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: netpanzer-data - Data files for netpanzer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190397 ------- Additional Comments From hugo at devin.com.br 2006-05-04 17:09 EST ------- While contents of this packages includes only data-files, they are included with a ./configure script and jam (make substitute). This is really strange indeed, but this configure searchs for these dependencies, just like the main netpanzer package (Bug #190396). As I like to work in the ways upstream works, I thought that it would be good to follow this scheme. But you're right about desktop-file-utils, it was a copy and paste error of mine, sorry :) I'm updating the spec and rebuilding the package after you comment about my opinion above. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 4 21:12:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 May 2006 17:12:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190397] Review Request: netpanzer-data - Data files for netpanzer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605042112.k44LC9G1017109@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: netpanzer-data - Data files for netpanzer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190397 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-05-04 17:11 EST ------- I already thought it might be such a thing (a strange configure script) in that case leaving the BR's in is fine. A comment in the .spec about this might be a good idea though. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 4 21:43:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 May 2006 17:43:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190000] Review Request: partimage In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605042143.k44LhORE026696@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: partimage https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190000 ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-05-04 17:43 EST ------- Well, it manages to build on x86_64, but failed on i386. *shrug* trying one more time. Other changes looked good, and rpmlint is happy again. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 4 21:45:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 May 2006 17:45:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190397] Review Request: netpanzer-data - Data files for netpanzer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605042145.k44LjZgs027476@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: netpanzer-data - Data files for netpanzer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190397 ------- Additional Comments From hugo at devin.com.br 2006-05-04 17:45 EST ------- Updated package: Spec URL: http://www.devin.com.br/eitch/rpm/fedora/SPECS/netpanzer-data.spec SRPM URL: http://www.devin.com.br/eitch/rpm/fedora/5/SRPMS/netpanzer-data-0.8-3.src.rpm Changes: - Removed desktop-file-utils BuildReq entry Notes: Commenting the BuildReq indeed is good, so I did it ;) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 4 22:20:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 May 2006 18:20:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189092] Review Request: boo In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605042220.k44MK8rj004669@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: boo https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189092 ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2006-05-04 18:20 EST ------- My latest build attempt on FC5 x86_64 at your latest srpm attempt gives: Processing files: boo-0.7.5.2013-4 error: File not found: /var/tmp/boo-0.7.5.2013-4-root-mockbuild/usr/lib64/boo error: File not found by glob: /var/tmp/boo-0.7.5.2013-4-root-mockbuild/usr/lib64/mono/* error: File not found by glob: /var/tmp/boo-0.7.5.2013-4-root-mockbuild/usr/lib64/pkgconfig/*.pc error: File not found by glob: /var/tmp/boo-0.7.5.2013-4-root-mockbuild/usr/share/mime/packages/* Note the /usr/lib64. The build logs are installing that stuff in /usr/lib. Redefining %{_libdir} is one way to fix this. Also looking the build logs, it's dropping the /usr prefix for the mime stuff because the configure script is not figuring out a shared-mime-info prefix. Summary: shared-mime-info prefix: gtksourceview-1.0 prefix: /usr boo prefix: /usr test -z "/share/mime/packages/" || mkdir -p -- "/var/tmp/boo-0.7.5.2013-4-root-mockbuild/share/mime/packages/" -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 4 23:00:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 May 2006 19:00:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189092] Review Request: boo In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605042300.k44N0alt015098@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: boo https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189092 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-05-04 19:00 EST ------- Yep - I'm getting that problem here as well. The configure.in script looks fine and passing --prefix=/usr on the configure line makes no difference what-so-ever, so something is going wrong somewhere, I'm just at a loss as to where. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 5 01:04:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 May 2006 21:04:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 180319] Review Request: svnmailer - Tool to post subversion repository commit information In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605050104.k4514Zio009469@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: svnmailer - Tool to post subversion repository commit information https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=180319 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|fedora-extras- |fedora-package- |list at redhat.com |review at redhat.com jpmahowald at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|roozbeh at farsiweb.info |jpmahowald at gmail.com OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2006-05-04 21:04 EST ------- The documentation may actually be of some use, as it's needed to generate a config file. But it does make sense to split it off. You may want to remove an annoying extra doc folder by doing in the %files doc section something like %doc docs/* But that's optional. Also a good idea would be a version bump to 1.0.8. For now: - rpmlint checks return clean - package meets naming guidelines - package meets packaging guidelines - license (Apache Software License) OK, text in %doc, matches source - spec file legible, in am. english - source matches upstream - package compiles on FC5 (x86_64) - no missing BR - no unnecessary BR - no locales - not relocatable - owns all directories that it creates - no duplicate files - permissions ok - %clean ok - macro use consistent - code, not content - nothing in %doc affects runtime - no need for .desktop file APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 5 02:52:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 May 2006 22:52:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 174952] Review Request: lightning - GNU Lightning In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605050252.k452qKYQ007270@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lightning - GNU Lightning https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174952 jpmahowald at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2006-05-04 22:52 EST ------- rpmlint of lightning-1.2-3.i386.rpm:E: lightning no-binary W: lightning devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/include/lightning/ppc/fp.h W: lightning devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/include/lightning/ppc/funcs.h W: lightning devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/include/lightning/core.h W: lightning devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/include/lightning/ppc/core.h W: lightning devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/include/lightning/sparc/funcs.h W: lightning devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/include/lightning/fp.h W: lightning devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/include/lightning/sparc/asm.h W: lightning devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/include/lightning/ppc/asm.h W: lightning devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/include/lightning/i386/funcs.hW: lightning devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/include/lightning/fp-common.h W: lightning devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/include/lightning/i386/fp.h W: lightning devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/include/lightning/i386/core.h W: lightning devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/include/lightning/asm.h W: lightning devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/include/lightning/i386/asm.h W: lightning devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/include/lightning/asm-common.hW: lightning devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/include/lightning/core-common.h W: lightning devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/include/lightning/funcs.h W: lightning devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/include/lightning/sparc/core.hW: lightning devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/include/lightning/funcs-common.h W: lightning devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/include/lightning/sparc/fp.h These are all rather necessary for lightningize to lightningize something. (Which it seemed to do successfully) - package meets naming guidelines - package meets packaging guidelines - license is either GPL or LGPL both included and OK - spec file legible, in am. english - source matches upstream - package compiles on FC5 (i386) - no missing BR - no unnecessary BR - no locales - not relocatable - owns all directories that it creates - no duplicate files - permissions ok - %clean ok - macro use consistent - code, not content - no need for -docs - nothing in %doc affects runtime - no need for .desktop file This is something to add to the exclude x86_64 tracker. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 5 03:22:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 May 2006 23:22:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190664] Review Request: keyutils - Kernel key management userspace utilities In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605050322.k453MdZZ014779@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: keyutils - Kernel key management userspace utilities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190664 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2006-05-04 23:22 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) Looks *much* better now. > This should fix everything barring the "weird" library naming - with that, I > followed the Ulrich Drepper guide to library naming. Well, how comes the rest of the world is not following this proposal? The only thing that matters is the SONAME, the library's filename is largely ignorable (c.f. info libtool, for why this naming is considered harmful). > Btw, did you mean a > literal '*' in the name of a library? Nope, your are encoding the rpm's Release-tag into the library name. I am building under fc4 and changed the spec's Release:-tag into FE conforming: Release: 1%{?dist} With this, I end up with /lib/libkeyutils-1.1.1.fc4.so => Bug in your Makefile: The spec's Release tag overrides the Makefile's RELEASE variable. Further (minor) issue: # rpm -qvlp keyutils-libs-devel-1.1-1.fc4.i386.rpm ... /usr/lib/libkeyutils.so -> //lib/libkeyutils.so.1 ... Note the double slash at the beginning. I am not aware about this being harmful under Linux, but under other OS it is harmful. Further general issue: * Shipping a static library (Discouraged with FE). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 5 04:00:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 May 2006 00:00:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188176] Review Request: gauche-gtk - Gauche extension module to use GTK In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605050400.k4540FMa026580@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gauche-gtk - Gauche extension module to use GTK https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188176 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-05-05 00:00 EST ------- Building on i386 with the fixed gauche gets further, but then fails: gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m32 -march=i386 -mtune=generic -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -I'/usr/lib/gauche/0.8.7/include' -fomit-frame-pointer -ma rch=i686 -DUSE_I686_PREFETCH `pkg-config --cflags gtkglext-1.0` -c -o glgdGraph.o glgdGraph.c In file included from /usr/include/pango-1.0/pango/pangofc-font.h:25, from /usr/include/pango-1.0/pango/pangoft2.h:29, from glgd.h:21, from gauche-glgd.h:26, from glgdGraph.c:12: /usr/include/ft2build.h:56:38: error: freetype/config/ftheader.h: No such file or directory and then there are cascading errors off of that; I'll attach the build log if you're interested. I thought the problem might be a missing BR: freetype-devel, but no luck. usr/include/freetype2/freetype/config/ftheader.h does exist. It almost seems as if a call to pkgconfig --cflags freetype2 needs to be made. I'm not really sure what's up. I know you wouldn't have submitted these packages if they didn't build for you, but I'm just having no luck at all building them. Are you able to do mock builds? I'm pretty sure my build setup is working OK, so you should be able to see the same failures I'm seeing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 5 07:57:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 May 2006 03:57:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190397] Review Request: netpanzer-data - Data files for netpanzer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605050757.k457vEIt011243@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: netpanzer-data - Data files for netpanzer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190397 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-05-05 03:57 EST ------- Looking good, _approved_! One request though, could you remove the %{?dist} from the release field before importing (don't forget to rebuild the .src.rpm)? There has been some discussion about large .noarch content packages like this eating up a lot of diskspace on the mirrors. So the idea is to build it once and then copy it over to the other branches. So you also won't need to request an FC-5 branch for this on the CVS-admin page. Instead once its build for devel (GRRR building on devel i still broken), mail Warren Togami with a request to copy it to the FC-5 repo. This was disccused here: https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-games-list/2006-May/msg00001.html Currently this doesn't help the mirrors, but in the future the copy may be replaced by a link. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 5 08:50:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 May 2006 04:50:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188176] Review Request: gauche-gtk - Gauche extension module to use GTK In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605050850.k458oTXs028379@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gauche-gtk - Gauche extension module to use GTK https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188176 ------- Additional Comments From gemi at bluewin.ch 2006-05-05 04:50 EST ------- You are right: mock build fails. However outside of mock the build succeeds. I don't know what happens here, I compared both build logs and they differed (except for the build paths) only the moment the build fails! I included buildrequires for some X libraries (configure checks for them), but nothing changes (package at the same place). The only thing that I noticed is, that some packages retrieved by mock are older than the corresponding packages I have installed locally (both mock and local are FC5), for example cairo = 1.0.4 locally but 1.0.2 in mock, and gtk = 2.8.15 in mock vs 2.8.17 locally. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 5 08:53:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 May 2006 04:53:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188176] Review Request: gauche-gtk - Gauche extension module to use GTK In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605050853.k458reEj029212@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gauche-gtk - Gauche extension module to use GTK https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188176 ------- Additional Comments From gemi at bluewin.ch 2006-05-05 04:53 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=128648) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=128648&action=view) local build log -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 5 08:54:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 May 2006 04:54:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188176] Review Request: gauche-gtk - Gauche extension module to use GTK In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605050854.k458sCe0029380@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gauche-gtk - Gauche extension module to use GTK https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188176 ------- Additional Comments From gemi at bluewin.ch 2006-05-05 04:54 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=128649) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=128649&action=view) mock build log -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 5 08:55:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 May 2006 04:55:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188176] Review Request: gauche-gtk - Gauche extension module to use GTK In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605050855.k458txtg029737@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gauche-gtk - Gauche extension module to use GTK https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188176 ------- Additional Comments From gemi at bluewin.ch 2006-05-05 04:55 EST ------- You can use meld to compare the two logs and see that they hardly differ up to the break down. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 5 09:23:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 May 2006 05:23:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189783] Review Request: e17: The enlightenment DR17 window manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605050923.k459NmJE004310@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: e17: The enlightenment DR17 window manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189783 ------- Additional Comments From che666 at gmail.com 2006-05-05 05:23 EST ------- prototype is done... a bit shaky yet... though features: written python fully localized menu generated according to the fdo specs optional prototype using inotify for makeing menu generation a push service id love to discuss further integration with you on irc if you are back on ignacio. maybe just drop me a quick email. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 5 09:25:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 May 2006 05:25:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 182254] Review Request: SS5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605050925.k459PNWD004690@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: SS5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=182254 ------- Additional Comments From matteo.ricchetti at libero.it 2006-05-05 05:25 EST ------- I fixed the init script (ss5-3.5.8-2) What's next step? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 5 10:17:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 May 2006 06:17:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188176] Review Request: gauche-gtk - Gauche extension module to use GTK In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605051017.k45AHvTe017360@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gauche-gtk - Gauche extension module to use GTK https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188176 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-05-05 06:17 EST ------- (In reply to comment #10) > You can use meld to compare the two logs and see that they hardly differ > up to the break down. I don't think it's a mock issue; I can reproduce this failure with a local FC5 build. Still investigating. What I don't understand is how the build can possibly succeed without -I/usr/include/freetype2 on the failing command. What is the output of: pkg-config --cflags gtkglext-1.0 on your local systems? Here, I get: -I/usr/include/gtkglext-1.0 -I/usr/lib/gtkglext-1.0/include -I/usr/include/gtk-2.0 -I/usr/lib/gtk-2.0/include -I/usr/include/pango-1.0 -I/usr/include/cairo -I/usr/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/lib/glib-2.0/include -I/usr/include/atk-1.0 which does not include the necessary directory. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 5 12:00:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 May 2006 08:00:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190664] Review Request: keyutils - Kernel key management userspace utilities In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605051200.k45C0hRb010852@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: keyutils - Kernel key management userspace utilities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190664 ------- Additional Comments From dhowells at redhat.com 2006-05-05 08:00 EST ------- > Well, how comes the rest of the world is not following this proposal? glibc and binutils both use it. > The only thing that matters is the SONAME, the library's filename is largely > ignorable (c.f. info libtool, for why this naming is considered harmful). Well, in my libtool info page, in section 6.4 (Managing release information), it holds up `libbfd-2.9.0.so' as the example of naming. > With this, I end up with > /lib/libkeyutils-1.1.1.fc4.so The library's filename is, as you said, largely ignorable; and the fact that the library version number contains 'fc4' will not cause binary incompatibility, since the SONAME is set to the interface symlink (/lib/keyutils.so.N). What would you suggest? I want the release number in there since the library may well be different between two compilations. I suppose I could edit out the distribution tag, but that's messy. Anyway, I've fixed the Makefile problem and the double-slash problem: SPEC URL: http://people.redhat.com/~dhowells/keyutils/keyutils-1.1-2/keyutils.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/~dhowells/keyutils/keyutils-1.1-2/keyutils.spec The static library should be there as this library wraps some system calls that aren't available through glibc. Btw, note that PAM and mount may both need to use the library in this package at some point. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 5 12:16:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 May 2006 08:16:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190664] Review Request: keyutils - Kernel key management userspace utilities In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605051216.k45CGDYT014385@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: keyutils - Kernel key management userspace utilities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190664 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2006-05-05 08:16 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > > Well, how comes the rest of the world is not following this proposal? > > glibc and binutils both use it. > > The only thing that matters is the SONAME, the library's filename is largely > > ignorable (c.f. info libtool, for why this naming is considered harmful). > > Well, in my libtool info page, in section 6.4 (Managing release information), > it holds up `libbfd-2.9.0.so' as the example of naming. Yes, binutils is a counter example of good practice and glibc is Drepper's playground - Almost everybody else is not following this bad habits. > > With this, I end up with > > /lib/libkeyutils-1.1.1.fc4.so > > The library's filename is, as you said, largely ignorable; and the fact that > the library version number contains 'fc4' will not cause binary > incompatibility, since the SONAME is set to the interface symlink > (/lib/keyutils.so.N). > > What would you suggest? You should learn to destinguish library API-versioning from package versioning. > Anyway, I've fixed the Makefile problem and the double-slash problem: > > SPEC URL: > http://people.redhat.com/~dhowells/keyutils/keyutils-1.1-2/keyutils.spec > SRPM URL: > http://people.redhat.com/~dhowells/keyutils/keyutils-1.1-2/keyutils.spec > > The static library should be there as this library wraps some system calls > that aren't available through glibc. Hmm? I fail to understand this, because your binaries are dynamically linked against libkeyutils.so. I am not going to approve this package in it's current shape. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 5 12:51:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 May 2006 08:51:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188176] Review Request: gauche-gtk - Gauche extension module to use GTK In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605051251.k45CprxI023847@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gauche-gtk - Gauche extension module to use GTK https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188176 ------- Additional Comments From gemi at bluewin.ch 2006-05-05 08:51 EST ------- Mea culpa! On my system I had linked /usr/include/freetype2 to /usr/include/freetype. When I removed the link, the build doesn't work anymore. So I defined CFLAGS to use the freetype pkg-config flags in the spec file. Now it builds in mock too. However, this means, that there is a bug in the pkg-config for pango: it returns only -I/usr/include/pango-1.0 -I/usr/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/lib/glib-2.0/include, but since the pango header file pangofc-font.h includes ft2build.h, the include path for freetype must be added too. Updated package: http://math.ifi.unizh.ch/fedora/5/i386/SRPMS.gemi/gauche-gtk-0.4.1-7.fc5.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 5 13:01:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 May 2006 09:01:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188176] Review Request: gauche-gtk - Gauche extension module to use GTK In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605051301.k45D1pPF027040@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gauche-gtk - Gauche extension module to use GTK https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188176 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-05-05 09:01 EST ------- (In reply to comment #12) > However, this means, that there is a bug in the pkg-config for > pango: it returns only -I/usr/include/pango-1.0 -I/usr/include/glib-2.0 > -I/usr/lib/glib-2.0/include, but since the pango header file > pangofc-font.h includes ft2build.h, the include path for freetype > must be added too. I thought it would be something along those lines but was a bit confused by the fact that pango-devel includes five .pc files, and the pangoft2.pc and pangoxft.pc files do have the necessary include path. So perhaps it's gtkglext-1.0.pc or gdkglext-x11-1.0.pc that should require pangoft2 or pangoxft? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 5 13:09:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 May 2006 09:09:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188176] Review Request: gauche-gtk - Gauche extension module to use GTK In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605051309.k45D9ftE029670@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gauche-gtk - Gauche extension module to use GTK https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188176 ------- Additional Comments From gemi at bluewin.ch 2006-05-05 09:09 EST ------- Ah, I see. IMHO this splitting in five .pc files is very bad. gtkglext probably dates from a time when pango had just one .pc file. BTW I also added -fPIC to CFLAGS, otherwise the shared object file gets a TEXTREL and loading it with selinux enabled will not work. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 5 13:15:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 May 2006 09:15:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190664] Review Request: keyutils - Kernel key management userspace utilities In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605051315.k45DFmLH031497@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: keyutils - Kernel key management userspace utilities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190664 ------- Additional Comments From dwmw2 at redhat.com 2006-05-05 09:15 EST ------- Should be OK if you drop the static library, and drop the weirdness with $(RELEASE) in the library filename. I don't think that using Uli's (weird, IMO) suggested library naming should be a barrier to Extras approval, but there's no need for you to make it even _weirder_ by including $(RELEASE) in the filename. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 5 13:39:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 May 2006 09:39:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188176] Review Request: gauche-gtk - Gauche extension module to use GTK In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605051339.k45DdS3e006190@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gauche-gtk - Gauche extension module to use GTK https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188176 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2006-05-05 09:39 EST ------- (In reply to comment #13) > So perhaps it's gtkglext-1.0.pc or gdkglext-x11-1.0.pc that should require > pangoft2 or pangoxft? Hmm, does anybody see any direct dependency between gtkglext and pangoft2 or pangoxft? At least, I don't see any, so I am inclined to think there might be a missing dep anywhere underneath. Or am I missing something? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 5 13:49:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 May 2006 09:49:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190664] Review Request: keyutils - Kernel key management userspace utilities In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605051349.k45DnRix008921@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: keyutils - Kernel key management userspace utilities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190664 ------- Additional Comments From dhowells at redhat.com 2006-05-05 09:49 EST ------- SPEC URL: http://people.redhat.com/~dhowells/keyutils/keyutils-1.1-3/keyutils.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/~dhowells/keyutils/keyutils-1.1-3/keyutils-1.1-3.src.rpm That's removed the release number from the library filename and disabled the static library. > Hmm? I fail to understand this, because your binaries are dynamically linked > against libkeyutils.so. The main user of these libraries is not intended to be my utilities; the main user is meant to be things like mount, PAM modules, NFS4, encrypted filesystems. Some of these things may require static tools to be installed to make a key available for an in-kernel filesystem or other service available, so that you can mend your system when it's broken. It's possible that I *should* include a static version of keyctl and make request-key statically linked, but I'll defer that decision for now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 5 13:53:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 May 2006 09:53:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188176] Review Request: gauche-gtk - Gauche extension module to use GTK In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605051353.k45DrL0O010106@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gauche-gtk - Gauche extension module to use GTK https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188176 ------- Additional Comments From gemi at bluewin.ch 2006-05-05 09:53 EST ------- (In reply to comment #15) > At least, I don't see any, so I am inclined to think there might be a missing > dep anywhere underneath. Or am I missing something? No, it is glgd.h that includes . -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 5 14:00:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 May 2006 10:00:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 169704] Review Request: mosml - Moscow ML In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605051400.k45E05P9012025@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mosml - Moscow ML https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=169704 ------- Additional Comments From gemi at bluewin.ch 2006-05-05 09:59 EST ------- Next try: http://math.ifi.unizh.ch/fedora/5/i386/SRPMS.gemi/mosml-2.01-8.fc5.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 5 14:01:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 May 2006 10:01:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188176] Review Request: gauche-gtk - Gauche extension module to use GTK In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605051401.k45E1c40012485@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gauche-gtk - Gauche extension module to use GTK https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188176 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-05-05 10:01 EST ------- (In reply to comment #15) > (In reply to comment #13) > > So perhaps it's gtkglext-1.0.pc or gdkglext-x11-1.0.pc that should require > > pangoft2 or pangoxft? > Hmm, does anybody see any direct dependency between gtkglext and pangoft2 or > pangoxft? > > At least, I don't see any, so I am inclined to think there might be a missing > dep anywhere underneath. Or am I missing something? As it happens, I think G?rard has done exactly the right thing. This package is explicitly calling for ft2 support by including pango/pangoft2.h from glgd.h. This only happens if the --enable-glgd-pango option is passed to the configure script, and HAVE_GLGD_PANGO gets set. So it's this client, and not a problem stemming from a missing dep somewhere down the tree. If there's a bug, I suggest that it's that --enable-glgd-pango in this package should also pull in the pangoft2 pkgconfig file for include directory settings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 5 14:05:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 May 2006 10:05:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190000] Review Request: partimage In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605051405.k45E5A0m013449@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: partimage https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190000 ------- Additional Comments From dcantrel at redhat.com 2006-05-05 10:04 EST ------- Ha! I'm an idiot. Fixed. Try again, por favor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 5 17:30:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 May 2006 13:30:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190845] New: Review Request: sblim Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190845 Summary: Review Request: sblim Product: Fedora Core Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: notting at redhat.com ReportedBy: jvdias at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/~jvdias/sblim.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/~jvdias/sblim-1.0.src.rpm Description: As requested by IBM with bug 182276, and agreed to by RHEL management with an exception, we need to ship the IBM sblim packages in RHEL-4, and RHEL-5 . SBLIM stands for "Standards Based Linux Instrumentation for Manageability", and consists of a set of CIM/WBEM provider modules, command line utilities, and development libraries. The "sblim-1-0" single component main package contains these sub-packages: sblim-cmpi-base-1.5.4-3.i386.rpm sblim-gather-devel-2.1.0-1.i386.rpm sblim-cmpi-base-devel-1.5.4-3.i386.rpm sblim-gather-provider-2.1.0-1.i386.rpm sblim-cmpi-base-test-1.5.4-3.i386.rpm sblim-gather-test-2.1.0-1.i386.rpm sblim-cmpi-devel-1.0.4-1.i386.rpm sblim-testsuite-1.2.4-1.i386.rpm sblim-gather-2.1.0-1.i386.rpm sblim-wbemcli-1.5.1-1.i386.rpm The sblim-cmpi*, sblim-wbemcli*, and sblim-testsuite* were previously shipped in Fedora Extras. As all these packages are really tiny, and all are very closely related, I thought it made sense to ship them all in one "container" RPM, so there only needs to be one new "sblim" component. There are @20 other upstream sblim modules that we may need to consider shipping in the future. I've 'cvs-import'ed the the 'sblim' module into devel/ - please add it to the dist-fc6 and dist-4E collections so we can ship it in RHEL-4 - thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 5 17:47:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 May 2006 13:47:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190845] Review Request: sblim In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605051747.k45HlglV019622@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sblim https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190845 ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-05-05 13:47 EST ------- I'll be happy to review the package for quality purposes, however why would we need this in Core? Why can't it live in Extras? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 5 18:04:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 May 2006 14:04:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188542] Review Request: hylafax In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605051804.k45I4HVo024786@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hylafax https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188542 fedora.wickert at arcor.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|fedora.wickert at arcor.de |bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From fedora.wickert at arcor.de 2006-05-05 14:04 EST ------- Sorry it took so long. The good thing about this is that I had enough time to really test your package. Hylafax works prefectly here together with a capi4hylafax package I rolled. Still I don't have a analog modem to test. GOOD: - Source matches upstream now $ md5sum ~/downloads/hylafax-4.3.0.1.tar.gz (from osdn.sf.net) 30f6e56629f6a0ff40846be30a4f4ab8 /home/chris/downloads/hylafax-4.3.0.1.tar.gz $ md5sum ~/Desktop/hylafax-4.3.0.1.tar.gz (from SRPM) 30f6e56629f6a0ff40846be30a4f4ab8 /home/chris/Desktop/hylafax-4.3.0.1.tar.gz - License field ok - explicit dependency on libtiff removed BAD: - still can't build this on my Core 5 machine, only mock succeeds. pkg-config still looks in /usr/local/.. - rpmlint errors in detail: RPM (build in mock from your srpm): $ rpmlint hylafax-4.3.0.1-1.fc5.i386.rpm | sort E: hylafax executable-marked-as-config-file /etc/cron.daily/hylafax E: hylafax executable-marked-as-config-file /etc/cron.hourly/hylafax E: hylafax executable-marked-as-config-file /etc/rc.d/init.d/hylafax safe to ignore E: hylafax invalid-soname /usr/lib/libfaxserver.so.4.3.0.1 libfaxserver.so E: hylafax invalid-soname /usr/lib/libfaxutil.so.4.3.0.1 libfaxutil.so ok for me, I don't see a reason for changing this and for splitting out 2 symlinks into a seperate devel-package. E: hylafax non-executable-script /var/spool/hylafax/bin/notify.awk 0444 is this on purpose? If not fix it upstream. ok then E: hylafax non-readable /var/spool/hylafax/etc/hosts.hfaxd 0600 E: hylafax non-standard-dir-perm /var/spool/hylafax/archive 0700 E: hylafax non-standard-dir-perm /var/spool/hylafax/docq 0700 E: hylafax non-standard-dir-perm /var/spool/hylafax/doneq 0700 E: hylafax non-standard-dir-perm /var/spool/hylafax/pollq 0700 E: hylafax non-standard-dir-perm /var/spool/hylafax/sendq 0700 E: hylafax non-standard-dir-perm /var/spool/hylafax/tmp 0700 due to ownership of uucp, safe to ignore. Nevertheless I suggest the other dirs in /var/spool/hylafax to be owned by root. E: hylafax script-without-shellbang /usr/sbin/faxsetup.linux ignore or fix upstream W: hylafax devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/libfaxserver.so W: hylafax devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/libfaxutil.so still no reason for a sepate -devel package IMO W: hylafax incoherent-version-in-changelog 4.2.5.6-1 4.3.0.1-1.fc5 make sure the version field and changelog are matching. Please insert a blank line after every changelog entry. ;) W: hylafax non-conffile-in-etc /etc/hylafax/faxcover_example_sgi.ps safe to ignore, otherwise mark this file as %config SRPM: rpmlint ../hylafax-4.3.0.1-1.src.rpm E: hylafax no-%clean-section IMHO you should replace [ "$RPM_BUILD_ROOT" != "/" ] && rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT with a simple rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT Your version is safer for other systems but this is a fedora package after all. Anyway: I realized I'm not allowed to review your package. You are a first timer, I'm not a sponsor. "The primary Reviewer can be any current package owner, unless the Contributor is a first timer." http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines#head-e1a114b23499786e13113ebf072d03a8f8d02094 So I have added the review to the FE-NEEDSPONSOR tracker. You will have to wait fore someone to sponsor you. Sorry, there's nothing I can do for you ATM. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 5 18:04:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 May 2006 14:04:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190845] Review Request: sblim In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605051804.k45I4Ioc024791@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sblim https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190845 ------- Additional Comments From jvdias at redhat.com 2006-05-05 14:03 EST ------- IBM have formally requested this package for RHEL-4, and it has been granted an exception for inclusion in RHEL-4-U4, so it must also be in RHEL-5, and hence in FC-6. Also, the emerging technologies group has been investigating use of CIM/WBEM recently as a core technology for enterprise management. Fedora needs core standards based management infrastructure that software developers and vendors like IBM can depend on being in every OS distribution - sblim fits into that category for IBM. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 5 18:20:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 May 2006 14:20:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190845] Review Request: sblim In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605051820.k45IKVlJ030539@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sblim https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190845 jkeating at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|notting at redhat.com |jkeating at redhat.com OtherBugsDependingO|188265 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-05-05 14:20 EST ------- Needing to be in RHEL5 does not mean it needs to be in FC-6. There is no more rule that it has to be in Core to be in RHEL. Period. Extras is perfectly suitable for a management suite, and Extras software can be used within RHEL. Punting this to an extras review, but still doing the review. Well, I can't do the review, 404 on the spec file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 5 18:33:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 May 2006 14:33:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190397] Review Request: netpanzer-data - Data files for netpanzer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605051833.k45IX4qV002671@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: netpanzer-data - Data files for netpanzer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190397 ------- Additional Comments From hugo at devin.com.br 2006-05-05 14:32 EST ------- Updated package: Spec URL: http://www.devin.com.br/eitch/rpm/fedora/SPECS/netpanzer-data.spec SRPM URL: http://www.devin.com.br/eitch/rpm/fedora/5/SRPMS/netpanzer-data-0.8-3.src.rpm Notes: Like Comment #9 said, removed the %{?dist} var from the Release field. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 5 19:04:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 May 2006 15:04:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190845] Review Request: sblim In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605051904.k45J4YHS013853@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sblim https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190845 ------- Additional Comments From jvdias at redhat.com 2006-05-05 15:04 EST ------- Oops, sorry, the URL should have been: http://people.redhat.com/~jvdias/sblim/* I've created the original URLs as well. NOTE: sblim is already in Extras, so this is not an extras review request - this is a request to add the packages to core. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 5 19:09:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 May 2006 15:09:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190845] Review Request: sblim In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605051909.k45J9BYP015042@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sblim https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190845 jkeating at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-05-05 15:08 EST ------- Ah, if its already in Extras, and you've gotten it imported for RHEL, there is no reason to move it to Core. Closing bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 5 19:17:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 May 2006 15:17:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190845] Review Request: sblim In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605051917.k45JHLG3017484@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sblim https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190845 jvdias at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |NEW Keywords| |Reopened Resolution|NOTABUG | ------- Additional Comments From jvdias at redhat.com 2006-05-05 15:16 EST ------- Sorry for not being clearer: there are some sblim* packages in Extras, but they need to be moved to Core, and the new sblim package ships all existing Extras sblim package in a single package, plus the new sblim-gather package, that was specifically requested by IBM. No, I have not gotten sblim imported into RHEL-4 yet - that is what I am trying to do, and was told to raise this Review Request. In short: sblim needs to be in both Core and RHEL-4 . Please let me know if there is anything further I need to do to make this happen - thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 5 19:27:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 May 2006 15:27:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190845] Review Request: sblim In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605051927.k45JRitd020543@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sblim https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190845 ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-05-05 15:27 EST ------- I'm sorry, I still don't follow. A package that exists in Extras can be imported into internal CVS and used for RHEL. It needs not be in Core for this to happen. It would be better to work with the current sblim maintianers within Extras and help them to create the monolithic package you're speaking of, and that could be imported into RHEL-4. Again, there is no need to bring them into Core for this to happen. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 5 19:53:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 May 2006 15:53:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187569] Review Request: xfce4-mailwatch-plugin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605051953.k45Jr9cp028637@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xfce4-mailwatch-plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187569 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|fedora-extras- |fedora-package- |list at redhat.com |review at redhat.com fedora.wickert at arcor.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From fedora.wickert at arcor.de 2006-05-05 15:52 EST ------- Thanks fpr the review, Kevin. Imported and build for FC-4 and FC-5. Rawhide is hosed ATM. Closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 5 20:21:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 May 2006 16:21:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190873] New: Review Request: gnome-ppp - A GNOME 2 WvDial frontend Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190873 Summary: Review Request: gnome-ppp - A GNOME 2 WvDial frontend Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: fedora.wickert at arcor.de QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://home.arcor.de/christoph.wickert/fedora/extras/review/SPECS/gnome-ppp.spec SRPM URL: http://home.arcor.de/christoph.wickert/fedora/extras/review/SRPMS/gnome-ppp-0.3.23-1.fc5.src.rpm Description: GNOME PPP is a modem dialup tool designed to integrate nicely into GNOME 2 Desktop Environment. It is very similar to GPPP dialup utility created for GNOME 1 and KDE equivalent, KPPP. Since it is a graphical frontend for the excellent WvDial too, very little knowledge is needed to setup a dialup connection using GNOME PPP. It features ease of use, HIG dialogs, auto detection of your modem and connection monitoring. Comments: builds fine in mock rpmlint is happy -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 5 20:37:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 May 2006 16:37:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190396] Review Request: netpanzer - An Online Multiplayer Tactical Warfare Game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605052037.k45KbH2r012358@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: netpanzer - An Online Multiplayer Tactical Warfare Game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190396 hugo at devin.com.br changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From hugo at devin.com.br 2006-05-05 16:37 EST ------- This package is now built for FC-4 and FC-5. Closing bug. Thanks for all the support on my first package guys :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 5 20:40:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 May 2006 16:40:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190396] Review Request: netpanzer - An Online Multiplayer Tactical Warfare Game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605052040.k45KefLD013468@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: netpanzer - An Online Multiplayer Tactical Warfare Game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190396 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-05-05 16:40 EST ------- Don't forget to build it for devel once building there is possible again and concider adding it to comps/comps-fe5.xml.in (cvs co comps) to make it show up in pirut. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 5 20:43:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 May 2006 16:43:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187913] Review Request: mysql-query-browser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605052043.k45Kh8rl014577@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mysql-query-browser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187913 ------- Additional Comments From dennis at ausil.us 2006-05-05 16:43 EST ------- im unable to recreate it i just did a select query on a table returning over 100,000 rows on my x86_64 box -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 5 20:44:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 May 2006 16:44:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190876] New: Review Request: childplay Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190876 Summary: Review Request: childplay Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://home.zonnet.nl/jwrdegoede/childsplay.spec SRPM URL: http://home.zonnet.nl/jwrdegoede/childsplay-0.81.8-1.src.rpm Description: Childsplay is a 'suite' of educational games for young children. It's written in Python and uses the SDL-libraries. The aim is to be educational and at the same time be fun to play. Some activities make use of language dependent voice samples, these sounds are shared with gcompris. For those you'll have to install the gcompris-sound package for the languages you intend to use. For example gcompris-sound-en . --- Notice that this package is pretty useless with any plugins installed, this I made it depend on the default plugins packages childsplay_plugings, I'll create a review request for that one next. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 5 20:49:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 May 2006 16:49:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190878] New: Review Request: childplay_plugins - Plugins for childsplay (educational games for young children) Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190878 Summary: Review Request: childplay_plugins - Plugins for childsplay (educational games for young children) Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://home.zonnet.nl/jwrdegoede/childsplay_plugins.spec Description: Plugins (games) for Childsplay a 'suite' of educational games for young children. The aim is to be educational and at the same time be fun to play. --- Sorry no SRPM, because the srpm size exceeds my homepage's max filesize. There are no patches or anything special though, so all you need is the spec and the upstream tarball which you can get upstream. These plugins require childsplay to operate see bug 190876 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 5 20:50:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 May 2006 16:50:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190876] Review Request: childplay In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605052050.k45Kop0E016762@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: childplay https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190876 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |190878 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-05-05 16:50 EST ------- For childsplay_plugins see: bug 190878 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 5 20:51:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 May 2006 16:51:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190878] Review Request: childplay_plugins - Plugins for childsplay (educational games for young children) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605052051.k45Kp347016880@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: childplay_plugins - Plugins for childsplay (educational games for young children) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190878 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |190876 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 5 21:22:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 May 2006 17:22:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190664] Review Request: keyutils - Kernel key management userspace utilities In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605052122.k45LM72W026269@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: keyutils - Kernel key management userspace utilities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190664 ------- Additional Comments From dwmw2 at redhat.com 2006-05-05 17:22 EST ------- (In reply to comment #7) > The main user of these libraries is not intended to be my utilities; the main > user is meant to be things like mount, PAM modules, NFS4, encrypted > filesystems. Some of these things may require static tools to be installed to > make a key available for an in-kernel filesystem or other service available, > so that you can mend your system when it's broken. To my knowledge, none of those things are statically linked. We discourage static linking in Fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 5 22:02:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 May 2006 18:02:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189092] Review Request: boo In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605052202.k45M2oXs005018@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: boo https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189092 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-05-05 18:02 EST ------- Simple fix - add export PREFIX=/usr before the configure line. Compiles correctly using mock (well, I'm saying it is, unfortunately rpmbuild is shot currently, but it's not giving any errors and is attempting to do the install step) As to redefining %libdir - it's pointless. Inside the makefile.am files there is a line like this (well, it's in monodevelop and a few others) pkconfigdir=$(prefix)/lib/pkgconfig which screws things up somewhat for lots of other bits. I've suggested a fix to the mono guys tonight (5th May) which alters the .am files to read pkgconfigdir=$(prefix)/$(libdir)/pkgconfig The configure script then exports either lib or lib64 depending on what is passed in using --libdir This should sort the problems with 64 bit systems currently found. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 6 00:41:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 May 2006 20:41:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 173722] Review Request: stratagus - Real-time strategy gaming engine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605060041.k460fCWm013348@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: stratagus - Real-time strategy gaming engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173722 ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2006-05-05 20:41 EST ------- %description refers to a "data sets page" for a list of games using stratagus. No such page is included in the documentation. Please replace this with a link to the sourceforge page listing available games: http://stratagus.sourceforge.net/games.shtml Any plans to package some of these games? :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 6 01:53:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 May 2006 21:53:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190308] Review Request: perl-PPI - Parse, Analyze and Manipulate Perl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605060153.k461rf56003568@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-PPI - Parse, Analyze and Manipulate Perl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190308 jpo at di.uminho.pt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From jpo at di.uminho.pt 2006-05-05 21:53 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > Sorry this took so long; I was in the middle of the review when I had an > emergency at the office. > > I don't think this is a blocker; it's proably a mock artifact, but I don't quite > understand the issue: > > t/14_charsets....................ok > 11/11 skipped: Bizare Unicode-incompatible locale detected > > The code that checks this is: > > # In some (weird) cases with custom locales, things aren't words > # that should be > unless ( "?" =~ /\w/ ) { > skip( "Bizare Unicode-incompatible locale detected", 11 ); > } > > This check fails in mock on x86_64 and i386, FC5 and development. I believe the Unicode support is still work in progress judging by the documentation and changelog (the unicode tests are even inside a skip block). I closing this ticket but will try to keep track of new developments in the sourceforge page. Imported and built for FC-5 and devel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 6 01:53:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 May 2006 21:53:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190310] Review Request: perl-File-Find-Rule-PPI - Add support for PPI queries to File::Find::Rule In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605060153.k461rgwh003583@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-File-Find-Rule-PPI - Add support for PPI queries to File::Find::Rule https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190310 Bug 190310 depends on bug 190308, which changed state. Bug 190308 Summary: Review Request: perl-PPI - Parse, Analyze and Manipulate Perl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190308 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 6 01:54:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 May 2006 21:54:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190310] Review Request: perl-File-Find-Rule-PPI - Add support for PPI queries to File::Find::Rule In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605060154.k461siiL003934@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-File-Find-Rule-PPI - Add support for PPI queries to File::Find::Rule https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190310 jpo at di.uminho.pt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From jpo at di.uminho.pt 2006-05-05 21:54 EST ------- Thanks for the review. Imported and built for FC-5 and devel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 6 05:43:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 May 2006 01:43:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190873] Review Request: gnome-ppp - A GNOME 2 WvDial frontend In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605060543.k465htkI030752@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-ppp - A GNOME 2 WvDial frontend https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190873 mpeters at mac.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |mpeters at mac.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 6 05:50:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 May 2006 01:50:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190873] Review Request: gnome-ppp - A GNOME 2 WvDial frontend In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605060550.k465oEF2031625@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-ppp - A GNOME 2 WvDial frontend https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190873 mpeters at mac.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 6 06:02:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 May 2006 02:02:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190873] Review Request: gnome-ppp - A GNOME 2 WvDial frontend In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605060602.k46622nv001197@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-ppp - A GNOME 2 WvDial frontend https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190873 mpeters at mac.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mpeters at mac.com 2006-05-06 02:02 EST ------- Good: * md5sum matches upstream: ec2e20fc713a01c953d759bea3df8618 gnome-ppp-0.3.23.tar.bz2 * Package appropriately named (matches upstream) * spec file matches src.rpm name * Package meets package guidelines * Appropriate License (GPL), matches COPYING file, in %doc * Spec file written in legible American English * Succesfully builds in FC5 i386 mock * locales handled properly * no shared libs to fuss over * not relocatable * owns every directory it creates * no duplicate files. Not even any triplicate files. * %defattr properly used, proper file permissions * Proper %clean * consistent use of $RPM_BUILD_ROOT * doc package not necessary * Package functions w/o docs * No devel package to fuss over * Includes proper desktop file - uses desktop-file-install * Scriptlets are sane -=- I no longer have a modem for it to configure, so I have not tested this package. But that is a *should* and not a *must* -=- Output of rpmlint on mock built fc5 i386 packages: [mpeters at jerusalem result]$ ls *.rpm gnome-ppp-0.3.23-1.fc5.i386.rpm gnome-ppp-debuginfo-0.3.23-1.fc5.i386.rpm gnome-ppp-0.3.23-1.fc5.src.rpm [mpeters at jerusalem result]$ rpmlint *.rpm [mpeters at jerusalem result]$ echo $? 0 [mpeters at jerusalem result]$ APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 6 06:12:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 May 2006 02:12:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190873] Review Request: gnome-ppp - A GNOME 2 WvDial frontend In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605060612.k466CiGH003239@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-ppp - A GNOME 2 WvDial frontend https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190873 ------- Additional Comments From mpeters at mac.com 2006-05-06 02:12 EST ------- Note on the test thing - I did try the app. No segfault. It correctly creates a ~/.wvdial.conf w/o a modem for it to detect though, that's as far as I could get. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 6 06:41:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 May 2006 02:41:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190071] Review Request: dvipost - latex post filter command In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605060641.k466fcZX009176@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dvipost - latex post filter command https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190071 jamatos at fc.up.pt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From jamatos at fc.up.pt 2006-05-06 02:41 EST ------- (In reply to comment #15) > Some comments: > > * %post -p /usr/bin/texhash > > will automatically add > Requires(post) /usr/bin/texhash Right. > So I think the explicit dependency on tetex-fonts is not really right > as it may change in the future. OK. > * A dependence on kpsewhich should be there, however, in my opinion: > BuildRequires: /usr/bin/kpsewhich Done. > * In my opinion the following should be used to detect %_texmf, since > in configure kpsewhich is also used (even though a bit differently > but I believe the result is the same) > %{!?_texmf: %define _texmf %(eval "echo `kpsewhich -expand-var '$TEXMFMAIN'`")} I agree, we should probably harmonize this in rules for tetex derived packages. Reading other tetex-* packages both ways are used. > * the tetex package is picked up by tetex-latex, so I think that > the dependencies on tetex should be removed. I knew that. :-) I removed it. The changes have been commited to CVS but I don't think the changes require a new build. The package build cleanly for all branches so I will close this bug. The package build cleanly, so -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 6 06:42:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 May 2006 02:42:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190502] Review Request: sportstracker In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605060642.k466ggQM009523@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sportstracker https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190502 ------- Additional Comments From mpeters at mac.com 2006-05-06 02:42 EST ------- Not a review - I've never reviewed a package that builds with mono before, so I want to watch some be reviewed first. But one thing I noticed : http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Mono It says All mono packages need to be in /usr/lib rather than whereever %{_libdir} happens to point to. There is a simple method to ensure this happens. At the start of the spec file have the line %define _libdir /usr/lib -=- Is that applicable to this package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 6 06:58:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 May 2006 02:58:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190071] Review Request: dvipost - latex post filter command In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605060658.k466wu0U012331@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dvipost - latex post filter command https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190071 ------- Additional Comments From mpeters at mac.com 2006-05-06 02:58 EST ------- (In reply to comment #18) > > > * In my opinion the following should be used to detect %_texmf, since > > in configure kpsewhich is also used (even though a bit differently > > but I believe the result is the same) > > %{!?_texmf: %define _texmf %(eval "echo > `kpsewhich -expand-var '$TEXMFMAIN'`")} > > I agree, we should probably harmonize this in rules for tetex derived > packages. Reading other tetex-* packages both ways are used. In this case - using %{!?_texmf: %define blah} should probably not be used since configure doesn't take an arguement for what texmf to use. So if I did rpmbuild --define '_texmf /mnt/nfs/my_texmf' --rebuild foo.src.rpm the package might fail because kpsewhich in configure would pick up TEXMFMAIN instead of what the macro defines. Once upstream adds a configure switch to optionally specify the texmf, then allowing a custom texmf in the spec file via setting a macro makes sense. Upstream should probably be bugged about that. If I was building it from source, I would want it in TEXMFLOCAL (or in my home dir texmf) - so it should be a configure switch (and probably should default to TEXMFLOCAL if no arguement is given to configure) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 6 07:24:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 May 2006 03:24:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189219] Review Request: poker-eval - Poker hand evaluator library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605060724.k467OS3e018100@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: poker-eval - Poker hand evaluator library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189219 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: [Games SIG] |Review Request: poker-eval - |poker-eval - Poker hand |Poker hand evaluator library |evaluator library | ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-05-06 03:24 EST ------- Modifying the Summary, because it seems that: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/PackageStatus Gets confused by the [Games SIG] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 6 07:27:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 May 2006 03:27:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188625] Review Request: AllegroOGG - Ogg library for use with the Allegro game library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605060727.k467RDTL018811@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: AllegroOGG - Ogg library for use with the Allegro game library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188625 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: AllegroOgg -|Review Request: AllegroOGG - |Ogg library for use with the|Ogg library for use with the |Allegro game library |Allegro game library ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-05-06 03:27 EST ------- Modifying the Summary, because it seems that: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/PackageStatus Gets confused by the change in capatialization done from Ogg to OGG in the name to even better match the upstream name. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 6 07:33:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 May 2006 03:33:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 167983] Review Request: evolution-caldav In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605060733.k467XAZv020833@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: evolution-caldav https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=167983 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776, 177841 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-05-06 03:32 EST ------- Remving FE-NEW & FE-NEEDSPONSOR blocker bugs -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 6 09:10:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 May 2006 05:10:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188369] Review Request: ctapi-cyberjack In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605060910.k469A66e012863@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ctapi-cyberjack https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188369 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-05-06 05:09 EST ------- I've taken a look at part 3 of the docu at: http://www.teletrust.de/index.php?id=548 It seems that the only relevant part of this pdf for our discussion is in Appendix A under "identification of CTAPI filenames with a wki" what the document says here is basicly that dynamicloaded libs implementing the ctapi should have a name in the following format: ctxxx[yyy] where xxx is a 3 letter abbreviation of the manufacturer (CTM ID) (the abbreviations are supposed to be asigned by a national goverment instance) So that helps a bit, what it says is that the way to install ctapi implementations for different cardreaders is indeed to use dlopen and name the implementation .so files different. The 3 letter thingie clearly is because of the 8 char length limitation dos had, and since there is no list of assigned abreviations to be found I say we standardize on the name: libctapi-.so But since these libraries are intented to be dlopen-ed and dlopen-ed only, and as such are unversioned (.so instead of .so.x) I don't believe the belong directly under %{_libdir} but that they shoud instead be put under say %{_libdir}/ctapi . Your story about DT_RPATH and LD_LIBARY_PATH above is about how things work for regular linked binari%{_libdir}/ctapies (iow not using dlopen). Notice that we don't need to create subdirs under for each ctapi-lib instead we could just put %{_libdir}/ctapi in a file under /etc/ld.so.conf.d . But that would beat the entire purpose of putting these files in a seperate dir: not poluting the global library soname namespace with these "plugins" . Another solution would be to teach the dlopen-ing applications about the new locations. I've moved ctapi-cyberjack.so* to %{_libdir}/ctapi on my system and then tried to run cjgeldkarte: [hans at shalem ~]$ cjgeldkarte Error loading CT-API library. [hans at shalem ~]$ cjgeldkarte -l ctapi/libctapi-cyberjack.so Error loading CT-API library. [hans at shalem ~]$ cjgeldkarte -l /usr/lib64/ctapi/libctapi-cyberjack.so Error doing CT_init. (Return code:-1) As you can see cjgeldkarte can no longer find its default libctapi-cyberjack.so and passing ctapi/libctapi-cyberjack.so doesn't help either, we need to pass a full path. Thats unfortunate because I find the full path ugly and it differs from one arch to the other (usr/lib vs /usr/lib/64) now we can patch the correct path into the binary during during built but thats not pretty. The last option is to set DT_RPATH in the elf headers of the binaries using the plugins to %{_libdir}/ctapi. This is quite easy, just change the "make" line in the specfile to: export LD_RUN_PATH=%{_libdir}/ctapi make I must say I prefer this option, because it keeps the unversioned ctapi libraries out of the regular soname namespace. I'll open a bug against openct which currently also installs an unversioned .so file in %{_libdir} for the ctapi. Hopefully with the input of the openct maintainer we can choose one of the 3 choises which I see we have: 1) drop unversioned .so 's only intended for dlopen in %{_libdir} 2) put them in %{_libdir}/ctapi and code full path's to them (and users who want to use a different then the defualtlib also must specify the full path). 3) put them in %{_libdir}/ctapi and set rpath to %{_libdir}/ctapi for binaries using the ctapi 1 and 3 are realistic options in my vision 2 is not. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 6 09:10:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 May 2006 05:10:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190471] Review Request: yakuake - Quake-style terminal emulator for KDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605060910.k469AMGa012936@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: yakuake - Quake-style terminal emulator for KDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190471 gauret at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |gauret at free.fr ------- Additional Comments From gauret at free.fr 2006-05-06 05:10 EST ------- Both spec files look good to me. Dawid, please post a link to the srpm so I can approve this formally. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 6 09:21:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 May 2006 05:21:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188369] Review Request: ctapi-cyberjack In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605060921.k469Ltk9015021@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ctapi-cyberjack https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188369 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |190903 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 6 09:23:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 May 2006 05:23:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188369] Review Request: ctapi-cyberjack In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605060923.k469N5qi015226@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ctapi-cyberjack https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188369 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-05-06 05:22 EST ------- As promised I've opened a bug against openct on this to get some sorta resolution, its bug 190903 . -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 6 10:03:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 May 2006 06:03:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190471] Review Request: yakuake - Quake-style terminal emulator for KDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605061003.k46A34bn023803@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: yakuake - Quake-style terminal emulator for KDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190471 ------- Additional Comments From gajownik at gmail.com 2006-05-06 06:03 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > Dawid Gajownik: Sorry, I didn't know about your package I did not publish my RPM earlier because I was waiting for marking yakuake as orphaned package ;-) I was using it locally. (In reply to comment #3) > Dawid, please post a link to the srpm so I can approve this formally. Here's the link ? http://fedora.pl/~gajownik/yakuake-2.7.5-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 6 10:17:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 May 2006 06:17:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188369] Review Request: ctapi-cyberjack In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605061017.k46AHJE8026439@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ctapi-cyberjack https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188369 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2006-05-06 06:17 EST ------- I agree with your vision wrt. 1) and 2), but I think 3) represents a too FE centric world view which will cause some pain for 3rd party non-FE apps that rightfully (per the spec) assume that they can just dlopen() the module. 1) is not too nice, agreed, but a fourth alternative would be to ship let's say a ctapi-common package which drops a /etc/ld.so.conf.d/ctapi.conf snippet which adds %{_libdir}/ctapi to the linker's load path, as well as include a README in the package that describes the install location and naming conventions for FE CT-API modules. There is also a slight issue wrt. the libctapi-.so scheme because in some cases, for example openct and (I guess) towitoko, it would differ from upstream module names. I think we should either stick with upstream naming or create compatibility symlinks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 6 10:19:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 May 2006 06:19:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188369] Review Request: ctapi-cyberjack In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605061019.k46AJmWK026932@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ctapi-cyberjack https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188369 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2006-05-06 06:19 EST ------- Forgot to note that when using the fourth approach, ctapi-common would own %{_libdir}/ctapi and all packages that install CT-API modules would install them into that dir and have a dependency on ctapi-common. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 6 10:37:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 May 2006 06:37:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189092] Review Request: boo In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605061037.k46AbOJa030724@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: boo https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189092 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2006-05-06 06:37 EST ------- (In reply to comment #10) > pkgconfigdir=$(prefix)/$(libdir)/pkgconfig > > The configure script then exports either lib or lib64 depending on what is > passed in using --libdir Without knowing a thing about mono stuff, that looks wrong to me. Did you mean $(prefix)/$(lib)/pkgconfig (or something else that doesn't have the potential of having the prefix inserted twice in the path)? $(libdir) usually already contains $(prefix). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 6 10:37:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 May 2006 06:37:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188369] Review Request: ctapi-cyberjack In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605061037.k46Abk6a030846@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ctapi-cyberjack https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188369 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-05-06 06:37 EST ------- The 4th alternative sounds like the best one to me. In this case I don't think we need to standardise the .so filenames, since they are already under %{_libdir}/ctapi, making clear what they are and giving apps a unique way to enumerate all ctapi implementations available (all .so files under %{_libdir}/ctapi) So I say lets go with the 4th approach: -ctapi implementing libs go under %{_libdir}/ctapi -%{_libdir}/ctapi is owned by ctapi-common -ctapi-common drops a (64 and 32bit?) file under /etc/ld.so.conf.d -ctapi implementing libs must depend on ctapi-common(.arch?) Who wants to create the ctapi-common package? We should also think about a ctapi-devel package containing a unified ctapi.h ctbcs.h and maybe manpages (from the towitoko ctapi upstream) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 6 10:52:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 May 2006 06:52:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188369] Review Request: ctapi-cyberjack In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605061052.k46AqtUi000723@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ctapi-cyberjack https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188369 ------- Additional Comments From frank-buettner at gmx.net 2006-05-06 06:52 EST ------- I think number 4 is the best solution. But where build the "ctapi-common" package?? It must be an solution where non OpenSource software also work, for example somethink like moneyplex. Ok when an final work about the solutions was find I will countinus to work on my package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 6 10:56:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 May 2006 06:56:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188369] Review Request: ctapi-cyberjack In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605061056.k46AuafU001419@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ctapi-cyberjack https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188369 ------- Additional Comments From frank-buettner at gmx.net 2006-05-06 06:56 EST ------- an unified ctapi.h is an second problem, because some manufacture add specal function the the api. But we can do make can ctapi-common-devel package, witch contains an general ctapi.h witch only has the the 3 needed funtion's(ct_init,ct_data,ct_close) so it can be used with all readers. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 6 11:13:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 May 2006 07:13:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189092] Review Request: boo In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605061113.k46BDqY5004000@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: boo https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189092 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-05-06 07:13 EST ------- No. libdir is exported from the config script. Looking in the configure script, it's the only thing it contains. When I've run the amended makefile, I've looked to see what is created and it's whatever you pass in For example ./configure Makefile contains --libdir = $(prefix)/lib (fine for 32 bit - not so good for 64 bit) Amend makefile.am so pkgconfigdir=$(prefix)/$(libdir) ./configure --libdir=/usr/lib64 --libdir = $(prefix)/lib64 (correct for 64 bit) Without the patch, pkgconfigdir remains $(prefix)/lib which causes problems further down the line when building against the created rpm (say for MonoDevelop) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 6 11:21:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 May 2006 07:21:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190911] New: Review Request: ctapi-common - Common infrastructure for CT-API modules Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190911 Summary: Review Request: ctapi-common - Common infrastructure for CT-API modules Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: ville.skytta at iki.fi QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Common files and packaging infrastructure for CT-API modules. For reference, see discussion in bug 188369. No URLs; the package is built from a selfcontained specfile which will be attached shortly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 6 11:25:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 May 2006 07:25:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190911] Review Request: ctapi-common - Common infrastructure for CT-API modules In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605061125.k46BPYH1006296@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ctapi-common - Common infrastructure for CT-API modules https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190911 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2006-05-06 07:25 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=128690) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=128690&action=view) ctapi-common.spec, first cut Here's the specfile. Contents of README intentionally kept generic for all architectures. I'm not aware of a way to specify arch-qualified dependencies in packages, so this one adds the %{name}(%{_target_cpu}) Provides for that purpose. Others are welcome to take ownership of this package, I'm not particularly interested in maintaining it (although there's not much to maintain here) as I don't have use for any CT-API modules myself at the moment. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 6 11:27:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 May 2006 07:27:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190911] Review Request: ctapi-common - Common infrastructure for CT-API modules In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605061127.k46BRYjo006878@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ctapi-common - Common infrastructure for CT-API modules https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190911 ville.skytta at iki.fi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #128690|0 |1 is obsolete| | ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2006-05-06 07:27 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=128691) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=128691&action=view) ctapi-common.spec, fixed And of course I posted a wrong version of the specfile. Here's the fixed one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 6 11:30:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 May 2006 07:30:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188369] Review Request: ctapi-cyberjack In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605061130.k46BUOKR007331@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ctapi-cyberjack https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188369 ville.skytta at iki.fi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |190911 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2006-05-06 07:30 EST ------- Bug 190911 contains a first cut of the ctapi-common package, feel free to review and/or take ownership. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 6 11:30:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 May 2006 07:30:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190911] Review Request: ctapi-common - Common infrastructure for CT-API modules In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605061130.k46BUjGn007608@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ctapi-common - Common infrastructure for CT-API modules https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190911 ville.skytta at iki.fi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |188369 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 6 11:33:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 May 2006 07:33:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190911] Review Request: ctapi-common - Common infrastructure for CT-API modules In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605061133.k46BXQrQ008378@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ctapi-common - Common infrastructure for CT-API modules https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190911 ville.skytta at iki.fi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #128691|0 |1 is obsolete| | ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2006-05-06 07:33 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=128692) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=128692&action=view) ctapi-common.spec, fixed even better *blush* -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 6 14:14:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 May 2006 10:14:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190471] Review Request: yakuake - Quake-style terminal emulator for KDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605061414.k46EEL3P002556@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: yakuake - Quake-style terminal emulator for KDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190471 gauret at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From gauret at free.fr 2006-05-06 10:14 EST ------- Review for release 1: * RPM name is OK * Source 29153-yakuake-2.7.5.tar.bz2 is the same as upstream * This is the latest version * Builds fine in mock * rpmlint looks OK * File list looks OK * Works fine -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 6 14:22:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 May 2006 10:22:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190471] Review Request: yakuake - Quake-style terminal emulator for KDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605061422.k46EMdw9004056@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: yakuake - Quake-style terminal emulator for KDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190471 ------- Additional Comments From hugo at devin.com.br 2006-05-06 10:22 EST ------- Ok, I'm retiring my package to use Dawid Gajownik works. All review should be in these files now: Spec URL: http://fedora.pl/~gajownik/yakuake.spec SRPM URL: http://fedora.pl/~gajownik/yakuake-2.7.5-1.src.rpm Way to go! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 6 14:38:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 May 2006 10:38:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189452] Review Request: perl-Curses - Curses bindings for perl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605061438.k46Ecr9W007054@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Curses - Curses bindings for perl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189452 paul at city-fan.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 6 14:48:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 May 2006 10:48:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 185795] Review Request: python-fpconst (Python lib for IEEE 754) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605061448.k46EmQMa008936@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-fpconst (Python lib for IEEE 754) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=185795 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|fedora-extras- |fedora-package- |list at redhat.com |review at redhat.com tkmame at retrogames.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: fpconst |Review Request: python- |(Python lib for IEEE 754) |fpconst (Python lib for IEEE | |754) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 6 15:32:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 May 2006 11:32:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190397] Review Request: netpanzer-data - Data files for netpanzer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605061532.k46FW5mt016757@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: netpanzer-data - Data files for netpanzer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190397 hugo at devin.com.br changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From hugo at devin.com.br 2006-05-06 11:31 EST ------- Package built for devel, and will be copied by Warren Togami for the other branches. I think the work is completed, closing ;) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 6 15:32:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 May 2006 11:32:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190396] Review Request: netpanzer - An Online Multiplayer Tactical Warfare Game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605061532.k46FWeFJ016957@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: netpanzer - An Online Multiplayer Tactical Warfare Game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190396 Bug 190396 depends on bug 190397, which changed state. Bug 190397 Summary: Review Request: netpanzer-data - Data files for netpanzer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190397 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 6 16:07:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 May 2006 12:07:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189044] Review Request: perl-Log-Message In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605061607.k46G7uic022548@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Log-Message https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189044 steve at silug.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From steve at silug.org 2006-05-06 12:07 EST ------- Imported, branches created, and builds requested. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 6 16:08:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 May 2006 12:08:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189047] Review Request: perl-Term-UI In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605061608.k46G88ke022610@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Term-UI https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189047 Bug 189047 depends on bug 189044, which changed state. Bug 189044 Summary: Review Request: perl-Log-Message https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189044 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 6 16:08:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 May 2006 12:08:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189046] Review Request: perl-Log-Message-Simple In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605061608.k46G8esZ022722@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Log-Message-Simple https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189046 Bug 189046 depends on bug 189044, which changed state. Bug 189044 Summary: Review Request: perl-Log-Message https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189044 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 6 16:08:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 May 2006 12:08:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189048] Review Request: perl-CPANPLUS In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605061608.k46G8pNf022792@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-CPANPLUS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189048 Bug 189048 depends on bug 189044, which changed state. Bug 189044 Summary: Review Request: perl-Log-Message https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189044 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 6 16:23:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 May 2006 12:23:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177081] Review Request: nucleo In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605061623.k46GNc1Z024702@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nucleo https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177081 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|tkmame at retrogames.com |chris.stone at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2006-05-06 12:23 EST ------- Okay, it may take me a while to get to this since I have a lot of packages I need to get in before I need this one. Also changing my e-mail address for this bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 6 16:29:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 May 2006 12:29:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189046] Review Request: perl-Log-Message-Simple In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605061629.k46GTXLA025631@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Log-Message-Simple https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189046 steve at silug.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From steve at silug.org 2006-05-06 12:29 EST ------- Imported, branches created, and builds requested. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 6 16:29:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 May 2006 12:29:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189047] Review Request: perl-Term-UI In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605061629.k46GTiwa025678@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Term-UI https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189047 Bug 189047 depends on bug 189046, which changed state. Bug 189046 Summary: Review Request: perl-Log-Message-Simple https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189046 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 6 17:15:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 May 2006 13:15:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188482] Review Request: scipy-0.4.8 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605061715.k46HFhgJ000531@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scipy-0.4.8 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188482 ------- Additional Comments From ed at eh3.com 2006-05-06 13:15 EST ------- Hi Neal, heres a few more comments (not a thorough review): good: + license is OK: its BSD-w/o-advertise-clause + source matches upstream needswork: - missing license file (please add "%doc LICENSE.txt") - missing "BuildRequires: numpy" - please use "%setup -q" Also, *please* build your package locally in mock. The commands are: 1) yum install mock 2) add yourself to the mock group (vi /etc/group) 3) log out/in for group addition to take full effect 4) run "mock -r fedora-5-i386-core scipy-0.4.8-2.src.rpm" and it will help you identify problems. Its a very good idea since mock is what the buildsystem itself uses. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 6 17:16:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 May 2006 13:16:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189047] Review Request: perl-Term-UI In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605061716.k46HGnGd000655@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Term-UI https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189047 steve at silug.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From steve at silug.org 2006-05-06 13:16 EST ------- Imported, branches created, builds requested. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 6 17:17:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 May 2006 13:17:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189048] Review Request: perl-CPANPLUS In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605061717.k46HHCNA000700@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-CPANPLUS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189048 Bug 189048 depends on bug 189047, which changed state. Bug 189047 Summary: Review Request: perl-Term-UI https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189047 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 6 17:34:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 May 2006 13:34:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189048] Review Request: perl-CPANPLUS In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605061734.k46HY02A003265@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-CPANPLUS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189048 ------- Additional Comments From steve at silug.org 2006-05-06 13:33 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > The Requires: filter is: > > @@PERL_REQ@@ "$@" | sed -e '/^perl(Your::Module::Here)$/d' > > I'm not sure what you wanted to filter there. I literally had to filter perl(Your::Module::Here). CPANPLUS-0.061$ find . -type f -exec grep -Hn Your::Module::Here {} \; ./lib/CPANPLUS/Internals/Constants/Report.pm:268:use Your::Module::Here; ok(1); > rpmlint is unhappy: > E: perl-CPANPLUS useless-explicit-provides perl(CPANPLUS::Config) That's auto-generated during rpmbuild, so I think we can ignore that. > W: perl-CPANPLUS hidden-file-or-dir > /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/CPANPLUS/inc/.inc > E: perl-CPANPLUS zero-length /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/CPANPLUS/inc/.inc Fixed in -2. http://ftp.kspei.com/pub/steve/rpms/perl-CPANPLUS-0.061-2.src.rpm Sorry about the rpmlint warnings. I thought I had checked that before submitting all of these packages. I guess I missed one... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 6 17:34:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 May 2006 13:34:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190066] Review Request: php-pear-Mail In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605061734.k46HYbQf003502@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Mail https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190066 ------- Additional Comments From Fedora at FamilleCollet.com 2006-05-06 13:34 EST ------- New spec and SRPM using %{_datadir}/pear/.pkgxml Spec URL: http://remi.collet.free.fr/rpms/extras/php-pear-Mail.spec SRPM URL: http://remi.collet.free.fr/rpms/extras/php-pear-Mail-1.1.10-2.fc5.src.rpm Build succed with mock. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 6 17:48:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 May 2006 13:48:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 180571] Review Request: puppet In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605061748.k46HmMOY005894@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: puppet https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=180571 ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2006-05-06 13:48 EST ------- Not running on FC5, x86_64, ruby-1.8.4-3.2 $ puppet /usr/lib64/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/server/filebucket.rb:8:in `require': no such file to load -- facter (LoadError) from /usr/lib64/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/server/filebucket.rb:8 from /usr/lib64/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/server.rb:180 from /usr/lib64/site_ruby/1.8/puppet.rb:332 from /usr/bin/puppet:58 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 6 18:01:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 May 2006 14:01:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189727] Review Request: Scribes In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605061801.k46I1qc5007711@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Scribes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189727 ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at ameritech.net 2006-05-06 14:01 EST ------- MD5Sums: 5031eaa0ef8817ea32d390fc4d26ceda scribes-0.2.4.3.tar.gz Good: * Source URL is canonical * Upstream source tarball verified * Package name conforms to the Fedora Naming Guidelines * Group Tag is from the official list * Buildroot has all required elements * All paths begin with macros * Desktop entry is fine * All directories are owned by this or other packages * All necessary BuildRequires listed. * All desired features are enabled * Builds fine in mock. Minor: * Non-blocker rpmlint errors, that are being addressed upstream: E: scribes zero-length /usr/share/gnome/help/scribes/C/figures/scribes_status.png E: scribes zero-length /usr/share/gnome/help/scribes/C/figures/scribes_editing.png Bad: * In your schemas scriptlets you can drop the 'killall -HUP gconfd-2 || :', since it's no longer needed in FC5 and above. * Instead of Requires for yelp, you should be using scrollkeeper, and it's associated scriptlets. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/ScriptletSnippets#head-3c9f517f0cd4aaabb369a8805226d85dc2f02793 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 6 18:02:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 May 2006 14:02:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190156] Review Request: php-pear-HTTP In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605061802.k46I2LH4007741@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-HTTP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190156 ------- Additional Comments From Fedora at FamilleCollet.com 2006-05-06 14:02 EST ------- New spec and SRPM using %{_datadir}/pear/.pkgxml Spec URL: http://remi.collet.free.fr/rpms/extras/php-pear-HTTP.spec SRPM URL: http://remi.collet.free.fr/rpms/extras/php-pear-HTTP-1.4.0-2.fc5.src.rpm Build succeed with mock. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 6 18:17:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 May 2006 14:17:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189080] Review Request: perl-Module-Info In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605061817.k46IHHcb012318@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Module-Info https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189080 ------- Additional Comments From steve at silug.org 2006-05-06 14:17 EST ------- OK, so I'm an idiot, I read "version.pm found, can not test" wrong. Sorry about that... I've made the requested changes in -2. http://ftp.kspei.com/pub/steve/rpms/perl-Module-Info-0.30-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 6 18:22:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 May 2006 14:22:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190911] Review Request: ctapi-common - Common infrastructure for CT-API modules In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605061822.k46IM8Y5014777@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ctapi-common - Common infrastructure for CT-API modules https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190911 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 6 18:30:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 May 2006 14:30:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190911] Review Request: ctapi-common - Common infrastructure for CT-API modules In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605061830.k46IUi5h018189@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ctapi-common - Common infrastructure for CT-API modules https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190911 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-05-06 14:30 EST ------- Oops hit save too soon (before typing the comment I wanted to type) I was away this afternoon (outside, fresh air and sun you know) and while cycling to the city I was wondering about the arch problem. And I came up with a nice and clean solution which imho is much better then in the current spec file: Why not make ctapi lib packages require %{_libdir}/ctapi instead of ctapi-cmmon, then on dual arch systems like x86_64 they will automaticly drag in the right one. Since both an i386 and an x86_64 version of ctapi-common could get installed we do still need the arch in the filename under /etc/ld.so.conf.d Also in this case I think it would be better to put the README in a seperate file and "install -p" it so that both arch packages have the same timestamp for it. What do you think if you agree please attach a new version and I'll review it. If you don't agree any better suggestions? I find your current solution not so elegant. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 6 18:34:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 May 2006 14:34:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189080] Review Request: perl-Module-Info In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605061834.k46IYduJ019286@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Module-Info https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189080 jpo at di.uminho.pt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jpo at di.uminho.pt 2006-05-06 14:34 EST ------- No problem. MD5SUMS: cba0296eedd5f24439aad1716d4caf76 perl-Module-Info-0.30-2.src.rpm a1e4e39cceda93dc0ab2d296b5075d76 Module-Info-0.30.tar.gz 66ce44d44e3e2c1b7c645aa55f89f6a3 perl-Module-Info.spec APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 6 18:43:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 May 2006 14:43:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190346] Review Request: vdr-subtitles - DVB subtitles plugin for VDR In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605061843.k46IhlBE023361@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vdr-subtitles - DVB subtitles plugin for VDR https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190346 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2006-05-06 14:43 EST ------- http://cachalot.mine.nu/5/SRPMS/vdr-subtitles-0.4.0-1.src.rpm * Sat May 6 2006 Ville Skytt? - 0.4.0-1 - 0.4.0. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 6 19:00:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 May 2006 15:00:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190911] Review Request: ctapi-common - Common infrastructure for CT-API modules In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605061900.k46J0sjg026061@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ctapi-common - Common infrastructure for CT-API modules https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190911 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2006-05-06 15:00 EST ------- The dir based dependency is doable, but it'll break as soon as some other package owns %{_libdir}/ctapi. We can make sure it doesn't happen within FE, but I can imagine a 3rd party package doing that eg. for cross distro compatibility issues. I find the provided thingy less likely to break, but I don't have too strong opinion on this. Regarding README, I have both i386 and x86_64 ctapi-common with differing README timestamp installed here, and rpm doesn't raise a conflict and even rpm -V is silent for both. Simply having it as SourceX isn't enough to guarantee the same timestamp in packages due to eg. cvs checkouts, it would have to be put into a tarball or touch'd with a timestamp to ensure that. I'm not sure if it's worth the trouble, especially considering that rpm doesn't seem to have any issues with the current implementation. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 6 19:11:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 May 2006 15:11:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188176] Review Request: gauche-gtk - Gauche extension module to use GTK In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605061911.k46JBKdO029542@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gauche-gtk - Gauche extension module to use GTK https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188176 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-05-06 15:11 EST ------- OK, now we're getting somewhere. Rawhide still looks broken to me, but builds in FC5, i386 and x86_64 succeed and I ran through the examples on x86_64 with no problems. rpmlint has a couple of complaints: W: gauche-gtk hidden-file-or-dir /usr/share/gauche/0.8.7/lib/.packages W: gauche-gtk hidden-file-or-dir /usr/share/gauche/0.8.7/lib/.packages W: gauche-gtk doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/gauche-gtk-0.4.1/examples/glgd/run /bin/sh The problem with the first warning is that it will set off various rootkit detection programs and is generally a bad idea, but I'm not sure if it would be feasible to change where gauche looks for its packages. I'm inclined to say this isn't a blocker, but if it's not difficult to make gauche look in "packages" instead of ".packages" then I think it would be best if you could do so. The second is simply that the doc file is executable, which is generally considered a bad idea although in this case the dependency doesn't cause problems. I would suggest that you just chmod -x examples/glgd/run. Review: * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible; text is included in the package. * source files match upstream: 18356efab446b9524be8371a3b852a6a Gauche-gtk-0.4.1.tgz 18356efab446b9524be8371a3b852a6a Gauche-gtk-0.4.1.tgz-srpm * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * package builds in mock (FC5, i386 and x86_64). O rpmlint has excusable errors. * final provides and requires are sane. O shared libraries are present, but they are internal to Gauche and so ldconfig doesn't need to be called. * package is not relocatable. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. O file permissions are appropriate, exceot for an executable docfile. * %clean is present. O %check is not present; no test suite upstream. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no libtool .la droppings. APPROVED, but please consider the two issues above before checking in. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 6 19:17:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 May 2006 15:17:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190911] Review Request: ctapi-common - Common infrastructure for CT-API modules In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605061917.k46JHlun030552@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ctapi-common - Common infrastructure for CT-API modules https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190911 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-05-06 15:17 EST ------- Ok, I kinda strongly prefer the %{_libdir} approach for the dependency handling I concider the other approach somewhat ugly. If a third part package causes things to break we will handle that the. If rpm doesn't mind different timestamps on the README I'm happy with things as they are too. Summarazing, could you attach a new spec with the %{_libdir} approach, then I'll review it, Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 6 19:48:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 May 2006 15:48:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188176] Review Request: gauche-gtk - Gauche extension module to use GTK In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605061948.k46JmWcJ003561@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gauche-gtk - Gauche extension module to use GTK https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188176 ------- Additional Comments From gemi at bluewin.ch 2006-05-06 15:48 EST ------- (In reply to comment #18) > OK, now we're getting somewhere. Rawhide still looks broken to me, but builds > in FC5, i386 and x86_64 succeed and I ran through the examples on x86_64 with no > problems. That sounds good! > W: gauche-gtk hidden-file-or-dir /usr/share/gauche/0.8.7/lib/.packages > W: gauche-gtk hidden-file-or-dir /usr/share/gauche/0.8.7/lib/.packages I understand the point. In fact the directory ".packages" is coded in the file package.scm of gauche. The problem is that ".packages" is hardcoded in the makefiles of the gtk and gl packages. This means that changing the directory will propagate down to the packages. I would rather leave it as it is for now. > W: gauche-gtk doc-file-dependency > /usr/share/doc/gauche-gtk-0.4.1/examples/glgd/run /bin/sh This file should be deleted anyway. BTW, the examples using OpenGL only run when gauche-gl is installed. Probably gauche-gtk should depend on gauche-gl then. Should we wait for the gauche-gl to be ready? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 6 19:50:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 May 2006 15:50:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177818] Review Request: adplug In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605061950.k46Joms4003799@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: adplug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177818 ------- Additional Comments From triad at df.lth.se 2006-05-06 15:50 EST ------- Upstream finally released a version including our fixes: Spec Name or Url: http://www.df.lth.se/~triad/krad/fc/adplug.spec SRPM Name or Url: http://www.df.lth.se/~triad/krad/fc/adplug-2.0-1.src.rpm (Bug 6 months+ hrm... Need to think of this. Perhaps nobody wants this.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 6 19:52:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 May 2006 15:52:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177865] Review Request: adplay In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605061952.k46JqMt3004099@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: adplay https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177865 ------- Additional Comments From triad at df.lth.se 2006-05-06 15:52 EST ------- New release from upstream: Spec Name or Url: http://www.df.lth.se/~triad/krad/fc/adplay.spec SRPM Name or Url: http://www.df.lth.se/~triad/krad/fc/adplay-1.5-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 6 19:53:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 May 2006 15:53:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 178360] Review Request: xmms-adplug In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605061953.k46JrisO004321@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xmms-adplug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=178360 ------- Additional Comments From triad at df.lth.se 2006-05-06 15:53 EST ------- New release from upstream: Spec Name or Url: http://www.df.lth.se/~triad/krad/fc/xmms-adplug.spec SRPM Name or Url: http://www.df.lth.se/~triad/krad/fc/xmms-adplug-1.2-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 6 19:55:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 May 2006 15:55:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177865] Review Request: adplay In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605061955.k46JtxLs004626@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: adplay https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177865 triad at df.lth.se changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|gdk at redhat.com |bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 6 20:02:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 May 2006 16:02:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189268] Review Request: xscreensaver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605062002.k46K2VSr005595@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xscreensaver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189268 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-05-06 16:02 EST ------- For version 5, I repackaged rpms as version 4.99.2.4-0.4 (put on the same URL). rpmlint results are: rpmlint log for xscreensaver-base-4.99.2.4-0.4.fc6.i386.rpm W: xscreensaver-base non-conffile-in-etc /etc/bash_completion.d/xscreensaver rpmlint log for xscreensaver-debuginfo-4.99.2.4-0.4.fc6.i386.rpm rpmlint log for xscreensaver-extras-4.99.2.4-0.4.fc6.i386.rpm W: xscreensaver-extras non-standard-dir-in-usr libexec rpmlint log for xscreensaver-gl-extras-4.99.2.4-0.4.fc6.i386.rpm W: xscreensaver-gl-extras non-standard-dir-in-usr libexec Rpm spec file is cleaned up to remove annoying complexity, and some patches are removed for the request of Jamie. The rest patches are now under discussion with Jamie and me. Currently, I removed version 4 rpm for extras: I will use xscreensaver-4.24-2 for a moment. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 6 20:11:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 May 2006 16:11:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189824] Review Request: lasi - C++ library for creating Postscript documents In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605062011.k46KBCJe006727@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lasi - C++ library for creating Postscript documents https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189824 ------- Additional Comments From gemi at bluewin.ch 2006-05-06 16:11 EST ------- One small issue: the summary of lasi-devel should end with a period. Another issue which is probably a mistake by upstream: "pkg-config --libs lasi" returns the empty string instead of -lLASi Looking at the examples, "-lLASi" is always explicitly included in the compile command. Also, the policy of FE is to omit static libraries, see "Static Libraries" in http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 6 20:34:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 May 2006 16:34:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190911] Review Request: ctapi-common - Common infrastructure for CT-API modules In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605062034.k46KYMUE010238@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ctapi-common - Common infrastructure for CT-API modules https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190911 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2006-05-06 16:34 EST ------- Ok, let's try that out. I thought it'd be a good idea to include a license file so I split README out anyway while at it. Hopefully I can assign the copyright to the Fedora Project...? http://cachalot.mine.nu/5/SRPMS/ctapi-common-1.0-2.src.rpm * Sat May 6 2006 Ville Skytt? - 1.0-2 - Encourage dir based dependency on %{_libdir}/ctapi in packages (#190911). - Split contents of README into a separate file. - Change license to MIT, include license text. - Add URL. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 6 20:34:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 May 2006 16:34:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188176] Review Request: gauche-gtk - Gauche extension module to use GTK In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605062034.k46KYTm6010269@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gauche-gtk - Gauche extension module to use GTK https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188176 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-05-06 16:34 EST ------- > I understand the point. In fact the directory ".packages" is coded > in the file package.scm of gauche. The problem is that ".packages" > is hardcoded in the makefiles of the gtk and gl packages. Isn't it just one line in each makefile, though? I don't think it's a blocker, but it's probably easier to change it now than to wait until later when you'd have to coordinate releases of all three packages. > BTW, the examples using OpenGL only run when gauche-gl is installed. > Probably gauche-gtk should depend on gauche-gl then. Surely not for an example. If you want to be complete, you can add a note in that directory indicating that the -gl package needs to be installed in order for them to work. I'll be working on gauche-gl soon in any case. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 6 20:37:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 May 2006 16:37:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188369] Review Request: ctapi-cyberjack In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605062037.k46KbaB5011015@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ctapi-cyberjack https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188369 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2006-05-06 16:37 EST ------- One more thing we might want to consider is to add something like "Provides: ctapi-module" (versioned using the CT-API spec if appliable?) to all packages shipping CT-API modules so that other packages that require some module being available can use that virtual dependency instead of having to leave it out or to depend on a specific implementation. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 6 20:49:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 May 2006 16:49:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189048] Review Request: perl-CPANPLUS In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605062049.k46Kn3MY012836@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-CPANPLUS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189048 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-05-06 16:48 EST ------- > I literally had to filter perl(Your::Module::Here). Hilarious. Sorry I missed that. > That's auto-generated during rpmbuild, so I think we can ignore that. Yes, you don't include it. I see no point in filtering it as it seems to be an RPM buglet. > Fixed in -2. Thanks. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 6 21:26:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 May 2006 17:26:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190935] New: Review Request: perl-Module-ScanDeps Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190935 Summary: Review Request: perl-Module-ScanDeps Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: steve at silug.org QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://ftp.kspei.com/pub/steve/rpms/perl-Module-ScanDeps/perl-Module-ScanDeps.spec SRPM URL: http://ftp.kspei.com/pub/steve/rpms/perl-Module-ScanDeps-0.59-1.src.rpm Description: This module scans potential modules used by perl programs, and returns a hash reference. Its keys are the module names as appears in %INC (e.g. Test/More.pm). The values are hash references. I'm not crazy about this package including something with a .pl extension in %_bindir, but unless it violates the packaging guidelines or anyone's religious beliefs, I'd rather just follow upstream's lead on this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 6 21:31:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 May 2006 17:31:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190935] Review Request: perl-Module-ScanDeps In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605062131.k46LVPrO018739@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Module-ScanDeps https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190935 jpo at di.uminho.pt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE ------- Additional Comments From jpo at di.uminho.pt 2006-05-06 17:31 EST ------- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 190582 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 6 21:31:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 May 2006 17:31:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190582] Review Request: perl-Module-ScanDeps - Recursively scan Perl code for dependencies In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605062131.k46LVagi018783@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Module-ScanDeps - Recursively scan Perl code for dependencies https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190582 jpo at di.uminho.pt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |steve at silug.org ------- Additional Comments From jpo at di.uminho.pt 2006-05-06 17:31 EST ------- *** Bug 190935 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 6 21:39:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 May 2006 17:39:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190937] New: Review Request: perl-Module-Install Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190937 Summary: Review Request: perl-Module-Install Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: steve at silug.org QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://ftp.kspei.com/pub/steve/rpms/perl-Module-Install/perl-Module-Install.spec SRPM URL: http://ftp.kspei.com/pub/steve/rpms/perl-Module-Install-0.62-1.src.rpm Description: Module::Install is a package for writing installers for CPAN (or CPAN-like) distributions that are clean, simple, minimalist, act in a strictly correct manner with both the ExtUtils::MakeMaker and Module::Build build systems, and will run on any Perl installation version 5.004 or newer. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 6 21:49:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 May 2006 17:49:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190502] Review Request: sportstracker In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605062149.k46LnCnM022178@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sportstracker https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190502 ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at ameritech.net 2006-05-06 17:49 EST ------- Spec URL: http://piedmont.homelinux.org/fedora/sportstracker/sportstracker.spec SRPM URL: http://piedmont.homelinux.org/fedora/sportstracker/sportstracker-1.2.1-2.src.rpm * Sat May 6 2006 Brian Pepple - 1.2.1-2 - Use %%{prefix}/lib. - Drop unnecessary Requires. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 6 21:51:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 May 2006 17:51:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190939] New: Review Request: daap-sharp Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190939 Summary: Review Request: daap-sharp Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: bdpepple at ameritech.net QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://piedmont.homelinux.org/fedora/tangerine/daap-sharp.spec SRPM URL: http://piedmont.homelinux.org/fedora/tangerine/daap-sharp-0.3.3-1.src.rpm Description: daap-sharp is a DAAP (Digial Audio Access Protocol) implementation. It is used by Apple's iTunes software to share music. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 6 21:54:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 May 2006 17:54:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190940] New: Review Request: tangerine Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190940 Summary: Review Request: tangerine Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: bdpepple at ameritech.net QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://piedmont.homelinux.org/fedora/tangerine/tangerine.spec SRPM URL: http://piedmont.homelinux.org/fedora/tangerine/tangerine-0.2.3-1.src.rpm Description: Tangerine is a DAAP server. You can use it to listen to music remotely though a number of applications, including iTunes, Banshee, and Rhythmbox. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 6 21:54:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 May 2006 17:54:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190940] Review Request: tangerine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605062154.k46LsxDi023027@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tangerine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190940 bdpepple at ameritech.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |190939 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 6 21:55:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 May 2006 17:55:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190939] Review Request: daap-sharp In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605062155.k46LtBi3023068@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: daap-sharp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190939 bdpepple at ameritech.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |190940 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 6 22:06:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 May 2006 18:06:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190937] Review Request: perl-Module-Install In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605062206.k46M6iWZ024571@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Module-Install https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190937 steve at silug.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |190935 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 6 22:06:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 May 2006 18:06:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190935] Review Request: perl-Module-ScanDeps In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605062206.k46M6tQf024591@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Module-ScanDeps https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190935 steve at silug.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |190937 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 6 22:07:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 May 2006 18:07:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190705] Review Request: perl-Test-Base In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605062207.k46M7aUA024915@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-Base https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190705 steve at silug.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |190937 ------- Additional Comments From steve at silug.org 2006-05-06 18:07 EST ------- OK, the stack was smaller than I thought (one module). Review away. :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 6 22:07:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 May 2006 18:07:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190937] Review Request: perl-Module-Install In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605062207.k46M7e8B024944@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Module-Install https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190937 steve at silug.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |190705 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 6 22:22:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 May 2006 18:22:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187913] Review Request: mysql-query-browser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605062222.k46MMmJS026959@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mysql-query-browser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187913 ------- Additional Comments From imlinux at gmail.com 2006-05-06 18:22 EST ------- Pretty close, under buildrequires you need to add desktop-file-utils. Without it this package will fail to build in mock. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 6 22:25:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 May 2006 18:25:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190213] Review Request: gq - Graphical LDAP directory browser and editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605062225.k46MPaYj027230@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gq - Graphical LDAP directory browser and editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190213 terjeros at phys.ntnu.no changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG ------- Additional Comments From terjeros at phys.ntnu.no 2006-05-06 18:25 EST ------- A-ha, I forgot: I need a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 6 22:34:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 May 2006 18:34:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190935] Review Request: perl-Module-ScanDeps In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605062234.k46MYC0G029018@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Module-ScanDeps https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190935 jpo at di.uminho.pt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|190937 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jpo at di.uminho.pt 2006-05-06 18:34 EST ------- Steven, This ticket is a duplicated of 190582. Moving the blocking information there. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 6 22:34:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 May 2006 18:34:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190937] Review Request: perl-Module-Install In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605062234.k46MYYuD029081@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Module-Install https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190937 jpo at di.uminho.pt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn|190935 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 6 22:34:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 May 2006 18:34:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190582] Review Request: perl-Module-ScanDeps - Recursively scan Perl code for dependencies In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605062234.k46MYwjJ029143@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Module-ScanDeps - Recursively scan Perl code for dependencies https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190582 jpo at di.uminho.pt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |190937 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 6 22:35:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 May 2006 18:35:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190937] Review Request: perl-Module-Install In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605062235.k46MZKBQ029229@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Module-Install https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190937 jpo at di.uminho.pt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |190582 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 6 22:53:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 May 2006 18:53:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190873] Review Request: gnome-ppp - A GNOME 2 WvDial frontend In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605062253.k46MrfTf032373@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-ppp - A GNOME 2 WvDial frontend https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190873 ------- Additional Comments From fedora.wickert at arcor.de 2006-05-06 18:53 EST ------- Thanks for the review and responding so quickly, Michael. (In reply to comment #1) > > I no longer have a modem for it to configure, so I have not tested this package. > But that is a *should* and not a *must* > IMO it should be a MUST and to be honest I haven't thought about that before. I don't have a modem atm ether, so I did not test this package. I rolled this package for my sister who is a complete newby. She manged to setup a connection and is happy with the package, so I guess it must be foolproof. ;) But I'm not sure if modem detection and works properly, so I asked a friend of mine to test this. I'm not going to build or release this, before I receive feedback (because I'm not interested in maintaining a broken piece of software). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 6 23:06:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 May 2006 19:06:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189197] Review Request: ghc-gtk2hs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605062306.k46N66sL001458@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ghc-gtk2hs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189197 ------- Additional Comments From gemi at bluewin.ch 2006-05-06 19:05 EST ------- (In reply to comment #9) > My only concern now with the current package naming (ghc-gtk2hs) is: what happens > if/when one day we want to build/package gtk2hs with another Haskell compiler or > interpreter (say nhc98, jhc or hugs)? In that sense using a more generic > name for the source package (eg just gtk2hs) might be better after all? > (We can still have a ghc-gtk2hs subpackage of course even in this case.) Yes, that would make sense for the source package. I suppose it is not required to have an main RPM matching the name of the SRPM. I thought, maybe better not split the packages into separate packages for gconf, etc... The largest package is gtk anyway. We would have: ghc-gtk2hs ghc642-gtk2hs nhc98-gtk2hs nhc98-118-gtk2hs etc... This would be much simpler. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 6 23:15:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 May 2006 19:15:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190873] Review Request: gnome-ppp - A GNOME 2 WvDial frontend In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605062315.k46NFHwT002646@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-ppp - A GNOME 2 WvDial frontend https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190873 ------- Additional Comments From mpeters at mac.com 2006-05-06 19:15 EST ------- It will use /dev/modem by default - I *think* udev will create /dev/modem symlink if hardware is present, so modem detection would only be necessary if fedora itself did not pick it up (or more than one is present). Even if detection fails, /dev/ttySN manually configured should work. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 6 23:17:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 May 2006 19:17:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 183912] Review Request: jack-audio-connection-kit - The Jack Audio Connection Kit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605062317.k46NHPrG002811@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jack-audio-connection-kit - The Jack Audio Connection Kit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183912 ------- Additional Comments From green at redhat.com 2006-05-06 19:17 EST ------- (In reply to comment #13) > Should we start an Audio SIG? I just discovered fedora-music-list. http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-music-list Perhaps some of you were unaware as well. Feel free to subscribe... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 6 23:58:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 May 2006 19:58:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190873] Review Request: gnome-ppp - A GNOME 2 WvDial frontend In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605062358.k46NwIW3009523@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-ppp - A GNOME 2 WvDial frontend https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190873 fedora.wickert at arcor.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From fedora.wickert at arcor.de 2006-05-06 19:58 EST ------- Right, gnome-ppp is just calling wvdialconf anyway, so this doesn't really matter. Imported into CVS, build for devel. Closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 7 00:05:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 May 2006 20:05:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188178] Review Request: gauche-gl - OpenGL binding for Gauche In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605070005.k4705cP3010936@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gauche-gl - OpenGL binding for Gauche https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188178 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-05-06 20:05 EST ------- On Brian's remarks: 1) I don't see problems with ownership of %{_infodir}; the package will own /usr/share/info/gauche-gl-refe.info.gz but doesn't own the directory. 2) Yep, those could be trimmed although this isn't a blocker. 3) I think it's important that Requires(post): and Requires(postun): for install-info be listed separately. 4) RPM won't pick up the versioned dependency. I don't know about Gauche internals but it's possible that the soname alone is not sufficient; there may be scheme code dependencies as well. G?rard would be the best one to decide on that. 5) I can't argue about VERSION; I looked for other rather content-free README files and found a couple quickly (axis and bug-buddy) so there seems to be some precedent for including that kind of thing even when it doesn't say much. It's a coin toss. My own issues: You're missing BR: texinfo; without it, no info files are generated and the build fails in %files. rpmlint complains: W: gauche-gl incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.4.1-1 0.4.1-3 Please add a changelog entry when you bump the revision. W: gauche-gl wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/gauche-gl-0.4.1/examples/slbook/ogl2particle/particle.vert W: gauche-gl wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/gauche-gl-0.4.1/examples/slbook/ogl2particle/particle.frag W: gauche-gl wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/gauche-gl-0.4.1/examples/slbook/ogl2particle/3Dlabs-License.txt W: gauche-gl wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/gauche-gl-0.4.1/examples/slbook/ogl2brick/README.txt W: gauche-gl wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/gauche-gl-0.4.1/examples/slbook/ogl2brick/brick.frag W: gauche-gl wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/gauche-gl-0.4.1/examples/slbook/ogl2brick/3Dlabs-License.txt W: gauche-gl wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/gauche-gl-0.4.1/examples/slbook/ogl2particle/ogl2particle.scm W: gauche-gl wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/gauche-gl-0.4.1/examples/slbook/ogl2particle/README.txt W: gauche-gl wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/gauche-gl-0.4.1/examples/slbook/ogl2brick/brick.vert I suggest you run these through sed to strip the carriage returns. W: gauche-gl hidden-file-or-dir /usr/share/gauche/0.8.7/lib/.packages W: gauche-gl hidden-file-or-dir /usr/share/gauche/0.8.7/lib/.packages Same issue as with gauche-gtk; it's your decision on handling this. W: gauche-gl devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/gauche/0.8.7/include/gauche/math3d.h Is this needed at runtime? The guidelines indicate that this should be in a -devel package, but it seems a waste for just one file. W: gauche-gl doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/gauche-gl-0.4.1/examples/glbook/run /usr/bin/env Probably the same issue as with gauche-gtk. Review: * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible; text is included in the package. * source files match upstream: a51b19a0f16f88ed6cd85c6e49cc6e75 Gauche-gl-0.4.1.tgz a51b19a0f16f88ed6cd85c6e49cc6e75 Gauche-gl-0.4.1.tgz-srpm * latest version is being packaged. X BuildRequires are more than necessary (which is not a blocker) and missing texinfo (which is a blocker) * package builds in mock (FC5, x86_64) (after fixing RB: texinfo) X rpmlint complains; see above. X final provides are sane; final requires include extra /usr/bin/env and install-info should be in Requires(post) and Requires(postun). O shared libraries are present, but are internal to gauche. * package is not relocatable. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. X file permissions: executable file in %doc. * %clean is present. O %check is not present; no test suite upstream. * scriptlets are sane. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. X no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no libtool .la droppings. * not a GUI app. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 7 01:08:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 May 2006 21:08:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190213] Review Request: gq - Graphical LDAP directory browser and editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605070108.k47188E3023858@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gq - Graphical LDAP directory browser and editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190213 fedora.wickert at arcor.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |NEW Keywords| |Reopened Resolution|NOTABUG | OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From fedora.wickert at arcor.de 2006-05-06 21:08 EST ------- (In reply to comment #8) > A-ha, I forgot: I need a sponsor. Then you should note close this bug but at it do the FE-NEEDSPONSOR tracker bug ;) Done and reopened. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 7 01:53:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 May 2006 21:53:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190583] Review Request: perl-Test-Differences - Test strings and data structures and show differences if not ok In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605070153.k471rEtS031044@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-Differences - Test strings and data structures and show differences if not ok https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190583 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |tibbs at math.uh.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-05-06 21:52 EST ------- Things build OK and the test suite says that it passes, but test 01text_vs_data is really noisy and looks like it should be failing. I'm guessing it's just stray output from the test. * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written, uses macros consistently, and follows the Perl specfile template. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. It's not included separately in the package, but this is not necessary as the upstream tarball does not include it. * source files match upstream: e4fa76bb11b0d1db2d4213390413f5af Test-Differences-0.47.tar.gz e4fa76bb11b0d1db2d4213390413f5af Test-Differences-0.47.tar.gz-srpm * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane. * no shared libraries are present. * package is not relocatable. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * %clean is present. * %check is present and all tests pass: All tests successful. Files=7, Tests=23, 1 wallclock secs ( 0.22 cusr + 0.08 csys = 0.30 CPU) * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no libtool .la droppings. * not a GUI app. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 7 02:00:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 May 2006 22:00:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190949] New: Review Request: gaim-gaym Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190949 Summary: Review Request: gaim-gaym Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/gaim-gaym.spec SRPM URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/gaim-gaym-0.96-1.fc5.src.rpm Description: This package provides a protocol plugin for the popular instant messaging program, gaim. If you want to be able to chat on gay.com via gaim, install this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 7 02:04:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 May 2006 22:04:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190935] Review Request: perl-Module-ScanDeps In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605070204.k4724DwL032712@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Module-ScanDeps https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190935 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 7 02:21:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 May 2006 22:21:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190583] Review Request: perl-Test-Differences - Test strings and data structures and show differences if not ok In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605070221.k472LQlC002682@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-Differences - Test strings and data structures and show differences if not ok https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190583 ------- Additional Comments From jpo at di.uminho.pt 2006-05-06 22:21 EST ------- Thanks for the review. (In reply to comment #1) > Things build OK and the test suite says that it passes, but test 01text_vs_data > is really noisy and looks like it should be failing. I'm guessing it's just > stray output from the test. The t/01text_vs_data.t tests are failing but as they are marked as TODO they count as sucessful. The TODO allows developers to start planning/creating new tests without having to making them successful. When they start passing they can be moved out of the TODO blocks. TODO tests that start passing are reported as "unexpected succeed". Further information: http://perldoc.perl.org/Test/More.html#Conditional-tests -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 7 02:50:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 May 2006 22:50:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 183912] Review Request: jack-audio-connection-kit - The Jack Audio Connection Kit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605070250.k472o2LK007657@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jack-audio-connection-kit - The Jack Audio Connection Kit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183912 ------- Additional Comments From nando at ccrma.stanford.edu 2006-05-06 22:49 EST ------- I'm sorry I'm late to comment on this thread... too bad I was not made aware of it till today. I have not yet looked at the spec file but I would recommend packaging the clock_fix branch of Jack CVS. Otherwise Jack will not work correctly on machine equipped with Athlon X2 processors - it will use the TSC for internal timing and will (given enough time) spew loads of warning messages as the TSC's of both processors drift apart. That CVS branch takes care of that. Paul (Davis) was going to merge it (with changes) to current CVS a couple of days ago but I don't know if it was done. I'm successfully using (and packaging) the clock_fix branch. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 7 03:22:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 May 2006 23:22:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189727] Review Request: Scribes In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605070322.k473M4cF011937@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Scribes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189727 ------- Additional Comments From peter at thecodergeek.com 2006-05-06 23:21 EST ------- Thanks for the review and suggestions, Brian. I've uploaded and updated version to address these: Spec: http://thecodergeek.com/downloads/fedora/scribes.spec SRPM: http://thecodergeek.com/downloads/fedora/scribes-0.2.4.3-3.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 7 03:40:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 May 2006 23:40:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190582] Review Request: perl-Module-ScanDeps - Recursively scan Perl code for dependencies In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605070340.k473emNg015402@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Module-ScanDeps - Recursively scan Perl code for dependencies https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190582 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |tibbs at math.uh.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 7 08:36:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 04:36:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190139] Review Request: rapidsvn - Graphical interface for the Subversion version-control system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605070836.k478a3k7014854@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rapidsvn - Graphical interface for the Subversion version-control system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190139 rpm at timj.co.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From rpm at timj.co.uk 2006-05-07 04:35 EST ------- Built successfully for FC-5 and devel (jobs #8854 and #8949) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 7 09:11:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 05:11:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190101] Review Request: php-pear-Log In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605070911.k479BI4O021099@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Log https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190101 ------- Additional Comments From Fedora at FamilleCollet.com 2006-05-07 05:11 EST ------- New spec and SRPM using %{_datadir}/pear/.pkgxml Spec URL: http://remi.collet.free.fr/rpms/extras/php-pear-Log.spec SRPM URL: http://remi.collet.free.fr/rpms/extras/php-pear-Log-1.9.5-1.fc5.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 7 09:13:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 05:13:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190956] New: Review Request: php-pear-Auth-SASL Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190956 Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Auth-SASL Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: Fedora at FamilleCollet.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://remi.collet.free.fr/rpms/extras/php-pear-Auth-SASL.spec SRPM URL: http://remi.collet.free.fr/rpms/extras/php-pear-Auth-SASL-1.0.1-1.fc5.src.rpm Description: Provides code to generate responses to common SASL mechanisms, including: o Digest-MD5 o CramMD5 o Plain o Anonymous o Login (Pseudo mechanism) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 7 09:15:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 05:15:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190957] New: Review Request: php-pear-Net-Socket Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190957 Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Net-Socket Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: Fedora at FamilleCollet.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://remi.collet.free.fr/rpms/extras/php-pear-Net-Socket.spec SRPM URL: http://remi.collet.free.fr/rpms/extras/php-pear-Net-Socket-1.0.6-1.fc5.src.rpm Description: Net_Socket is a class interface to TCP sockets. It provides blocking and non-blocking operation, with different reading and writing modes (byte-wise, block-wise, line-wise and special formats like network byte-order ip addresses). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 7 09:17:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 05:17:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190958] New: Review Request: php-pear-Net-SMTP Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190958 Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Net-SMTP Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: Fedora at FamilleCollet.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://remi.collet.free.fr/rpms/extras/php-pear-Net-SMTP.spec SRPM URL: http://remi.collet.free.fr/rpms/extras/php-pear-Net-SMTP-1.2.8-1.fc5.src.rpm Description: Provides an implementation of the SMTP protocol using PEAR's Net_Socket class. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 7 09:19:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 05:19:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190958] Review Request: php-pear-Net-SMTP In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605070919.k479JXFL022822@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Net-SMTP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190958 Fedora at FamilleCollet.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |190956, 190957 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 7 09:19:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 05:19:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190956] Review Request: php-pear-Auth-SASL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605070919.k479JXkm022832@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Auth-SASL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190956 Fedora at FamilleCollet.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |190958 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 7 09:19:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 05:19:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190957] Review Request: php-pear-Net-Socket In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605070919.k479Jifq022855@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Net-Socket https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190957 Fedora at FamilleCollet.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |190958 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 7 09:27:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 05:27:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187843] Review Request: phpMyAdmin - Web based MySQL browser written in php In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605070927.k479RFuO024134@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: phpMyAdmin - Web based MySQL browser written in php https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187843 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|fedora-extras- |fedora-package- |list at redhat.com |review at redhat.com Fedora at FamilleCollet.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |Fedora at FamilleCollet.com ------- Additional Comments From Fedora at FamilleCollet.com 2006-05-07 05:27 EST ------- The only Requires in the spec is httpd. To run phpMyAdmin also need php, php-mysql and php-mbstring. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 7 09:56:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 05:56:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190911] Review Request: ctapi-common - Common infrastructure for CT-API modules In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605070956.k479u68N029706@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ctapi-common - Common infrastructure for CT-API modules https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190911 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-05-07 05:56 EST ------- MUST: ===== * rpmlint output is: E: ctapi-common no-binary W: ctapi-common non-conffile-in-etc /etc/ld.so.conf.d/ctapi-x86_64.conf The error can be ignored, I don't know about the warning wine also drops a file under /etc/ld.so.conf.d and doesn't mark it config either, but that could actually be a wine packaging bug. I'll leave this one up to your discretion. * Package and spec file named appropriately * Packaged according to packaging guidelines * License (MIT) ok, license file included * spec file is legible and in Am. English. * Source matches upstream NA, no upstream * Compiles and builds on devel-x86_64 * BR: ok * No locales * No shared libraries * Not relocatable * Package owns all dirs it should own * No duplicate files & Permissions ok * %clean & macro usage OK * Contains "code" only * %doc does not affect runtime, and isn't large enough to warrent a sub package * no -devel package needed, no libs / .la files. * no gui -> no .desktop file required Approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 7 10:02:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 06:02:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188369] Review Request: ctapi-cyberjack In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605071002.k47A2NoW030914@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ctapi-cyberjack https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188369 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-05-07 06:02 EST ------- I've just approved the ctapi-common package (bug 190911). I guess Ville will import and build this soon. So we've "solved" the where to put the ctapi library issue. Please modify your package to install the library under %{_libdir}/ctapi and add: Requires: %{_libdir}/ctapi Also please remove the versioning (.0) from ctapi-cyberjack.so, but you should still pass the -soname flag to the linker, just without the .0, .so files should always should have an soname set. I'm not sure what todo with regards to soname versioning for the pcsc ifd-handler .so file. Ville do you know if these should be versioned or not? Once we have the versioning of the pcsc ifd-handler .so file figured out please create yet another version of your package. Sorry for the rough ride for your first package. As I already said you picked a hard one. Well concider this a good introduction to the review process and the general community process. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 7 10:07:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 06:07:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189048] Review Request: perl-CPANPLUS In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605071007.k47A7mHf031947@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-CPANPLUS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189048 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-05-07 06:07 EST ------- (In reply to comment #6) > Sorry about the rpmlint warnings. I thought I had checked that before > submitting all of these packages. I guess I missed one... Possibly not; I've had that happen too. I think it's because new versions of rpmlint find new things to complain about. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 7 10:40:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 06:40:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 165311] Review Request: Tiger, security auditing on UNIX systems In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605071040.k47AeePx006165@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Tiger, security auditing on UNIX systems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=165311 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|gdk at redhat.com |j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-05-07 06:40 EST ------- I've build your SRPM and installed it on both FC-5 and devel and I must say I like it, it gives a few false positives that need fixing (but thats something which can be best done later, iow not a blocker for review and approval). And it indeed needs extending with some Fedora specific tests like rpm --verify -a and an SELinux label check, but in general its a nice tool. As such I'm assigning this to me and going todo a review somewhere the next week, please let me know if you have / are planning on a newer version and if you rather would want that reviewed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 7 13:07:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 09:07:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188369] Review Request: ctapi-cyberjack In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605071307.k47D7c81029289@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ctapi-cyberjack https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188369 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2006-05-07 09:07 EST ------- I've seen both versioned and unversioned ifdhandler *.so's. But that's of cosmetic nature; the drivers are loaded based on filenames anyway, either though "bundles" where Info.plist contains the filename of the driver, or full path to it in /etc/reader.conf. Both ccid and openct contain examples of both usages, and ccid has versioned, openct unversioned *.so. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 7 13:22:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 09:22:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189727] Review Request: Scribes In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605071322.k47DMQtk031225@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Scribes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189727 bdpepple at ameritech.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at ameritech.net 2006-05-07 09:22 EST ------- The changes you made looks good, go ahead and import it into FE CVS. PUBLISH +1, full review in comment #2. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 7 13:53:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 09:53:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190911] Review Request: ctapi-common - Common infrastructure for CT-API modules In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605071353.k47Drhpe004195@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ctapi-common - Common infrastructure for CT-API modules https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190911 ville.skytta at iki.fi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2006-05-07 09:53 EST ------- mysql and qt have their ld.so.conf.d snippets non-%config which is why I made it so in this package too. This can be changed later if needed. Imported and built for devel, FC-4 and FC-5 builds will follow when the branches are ready. http://buildsys.fedoraproject.org/build-status/job.psp?uid=8974 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 7 13:54:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 09:54:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188369] Review Request: ctapi-cyberjack In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605071354.k47DsFaH004271@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ctapi-cyberjack https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188369 Bug 188369 depends on bug 190911, which changed state. Bug 190911 Summary: Review Request: ctapi-common - Common infrastructure for CT-API modules https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190911 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 7 13:56:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 09:56:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188369] Review Request: ctapi-cyberjack In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605071356.k47DuLn6004575@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ctapi-cyberjack https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188369 Bug 188369 depends on bug 190903, which changed state. Bug 190903 Summary: Unversioned .so installed in %{_libdir} https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190903 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |ERRATA Status|NEEDINFO |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 7 14:14:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 10:14:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188369] Review Request: ctapi-cyberjack In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605071414.k47EEnp8007222@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ctapi-cyberjack https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188369 ------- Additional Comments From frank-buettner at gmx.net 2006-05-07 10:14 EST ------- ok I make the next build on some hours. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 7 15:12:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 11:12:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190583] Review Request: perl-Test-Differences - Test strings and data structures and show differences if not ok In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605071512.k47FCHOW015980@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-Differences - Test strings and data structures and show differences if not ok https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190583 jpo at di.uminho.pt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From jpo at di.uminho.pt 2006-05-07 11:12 EST ------- Imported and built for FC-4, FC-5, and devel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 7 15:46:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 11:46:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 185370] Review Request: gtklp - A GTK frontend to CUPS In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605071546.k47Fkxnm021647@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtklp - A GTK frontend to CUPS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=185370 jpmahowald at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |jpmahowald at gmail.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2006-05-07 11:46 EST ------- - rpmlint checks return: W: gtklp incoherent-version-in-changelog 1.2.1-1 1.2.1-2 Minor, release just doesn't match E: gtklp incorrect-locale-subdir /usr/share/locale/chs/LC_MESSAGES/gtklp.mo E: gtklp incorrect-locale-cs /usr/share/locale/cz/LC_MESSAGES/gtklp.mo E: gtklp incorrect-locale-subdir /usr/share/locale/cht/LC_MESSAGES/gtklp.mo - package meets naming guidelines - package meets packaging guidelines - license (GPL) OK, text in %doc, matches source - spec file legible, in am. english - source matches upstream - package compiles on FC5 (x86_64) - no missing BR - no unnecessary BR - locales handled properly - not relocatable - owns all directories that it creates - no duplicate files - permissions ok - %clean ok - macro use consistent - code, not content - no need for -docs - nothing in %doc affects runtime - .desktop files It'd be a good idea to inform the author when this goes through so they can add it to their distribution list. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 7 15:53:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 11:53:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 185370] Review Request: gtklp - A GTK frontend to CUPS In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605071553.k47FrXsZ022816@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtklp - A GTK frontend to CUPS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=185370 ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at ameritech.net 2006-05-07 11:53 EST ------- Couple of quick items: 1. Duplicate BuildRequires: openssl-devel (provided by cups-devel) 2. Requires for cups shouldn't be needed, since the devel packages soname should pull this in. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 7 16:14:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 12:14:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190362] Review Request: unifdef In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605071614.k47GEhtu025762@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: unifdef https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190362 ------- Additional Comments From jpo at di.uminho.pt 2006-05-07 12:14 EST ------- The CVS branches for FC-4 and FC-5 are still missing. The request must be placed here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/CVSSyncNeeded -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 7 16:20:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 12:20:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190362] Review Request: unifdef In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605071620.k47GKsUX026552@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: unifdef https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190362 ------- Additional Comments From dwmw2 at redhat.com 2006-05-07 12:20 EST ------- Unless I was hallucinating, it _was_ added there. I added it again. Does the Wiki let you see any more history than the one most recent change? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 7 16:25:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 12:25:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190362] Review Request: unifdef In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605071625.k47GPIXm027212@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: unifdef https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190362 ------- Additional Comments From dwmw2 at redhat.com 2006-05-07 12:25 EST ------- Ah. I mistyped the package name as 'unidef' and Warren removed it without comment. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 7 16:25:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 12:25:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188369] Review Request: ctapi-cyberjack In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605071625.k47GPkKd027293@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ctapi-cyberjack https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188369 ------- Additional Comments From frank-buettner at gmx.net 2006-05-07 12:25 EST ------- So the next try please http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/qsmartcard/ctapi-cyberjack-2.0.8-8FC5.src.rpm?download -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 7 16:51:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 12:51:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188369] Review Request: ctapi-cyberjack In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605071651.k47GphFm031722@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ctapi-cyberjack https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188369 ------- Additional Comments From frank-buettner at gmx.net 2006-05-07 12:51 EST ------- But now the next problem:( the lib is called libctapi-cyberjack.so.0 in the libcache. And so the apps can't find it because the look for libctapi-cyberjack.so -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 7 17:47:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 13:47:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 183912] Review Request: jack-audio-connection-kit - The Jack Audio Connection Kit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605071747.k47Hl4sv008181@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jack-audio-connection-kit - The Jack Audio Connection Kit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183912 ------- Additional Comments From nando at ccrma.stanford.edu 2006-05-07 13:47 EST ------- BTW, you can grab a tarball from the SRPM here: http://ccrma.stanford.edu/planetccrma/mirror/all/linux/SRPMS/jack-audio-connection-kit-0.101.0-0.2.cvs.src.rpm (which includes a "jack-get-cvs" script) or do: cvs -d:pserver:anonymous at cvs.sourceforge.net:/cvsroot/jackit login cvs -z3 -d:pserver:anonymous at cvs.sourceforge.net:/cvsroot/jackit co -rclockfix jack I know this is going back to an earlier "release" but otherwise Jack will not work on X2 machines. Another alternative would be to extract the relevant modifications and apply as a patch to your version (I used to do that before that clockfix branch was there). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 7 17:50:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 13:50:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 186391] Review Request: 855resolution - Change video bios resolutions on laptops with Intel graphic chipsets In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605071750.k47Ho4eM008759@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: 855resolution - Change video bios resolutions on laptops with Intel graphic chipsets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=186391 imlinux at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |imlinux at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From imlinux at gmail.com 2006-05-07 13:49 EST ------- This may get obsoleted soon but I presently use it and choices are always nice. Needs work: -buildroot should be: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) -Add chkconf go both post and preun requires -Use %{_initrddir} -Don't config the hooks or the init in %files. -Strange license. Maybe query upstream to pick a commonly used license? Items for discussion: -This really shouldn't be enabled by default or have any default working config. I'd say force the user to read the documentation to make sure they know exactly what they are doing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 7 17:50:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 13:50:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 183912] Review Request: jack-audio-connection-kit - The Jack Audio Connection Kit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605071750.k47HoKPX008810@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jack-audio-connection-kit - The Jack Audio Connection Kit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183912 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-05-07 13:50 EST ------- For review purposes, IMO, I'd recommend sticking with officially released sources. After initial import/build, upgrading to a cvs version could be a possibility. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 7 17:52:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 13:52:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187843] Review Request: phpMyAdmin - Web based MySQL browser written in php In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605071752.k47HqTDn009239@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: phpMyAdmin - Web based MySQL browser written in php https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187843 ------- Additional Comments From imlinux at gmail.com 2006-05-07 13:52 EST ------- Added php-mysql and php-mbstring to Requires: SPEC: http://mmcgrath.net/~mmcgrath/phpMyAdmin/phpMyAdmin.spec SRPM: http://mmcgrath.net/~mmcgrath/phpMyAdmin/phpMyAdmin-2.8.0.3-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 7 17:59:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 13:59:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 185370] Review Request: gtklp - A GTK frontend to CUPS In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605071759.k47HxIFA010473@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtklp - A GTK frontend to CUPS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=185370 ------- Additional Comments From gemi at bluewin.ch 2006-05-07 13:59 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > E: gtklp incorrect-locale-cs /usr/share/locale/cz/LC_MESSAGES/gtklp.mo This should be in facte cs instead of cz. > E: gtklp incorrect-locale-subdir /usr/share/locale/chs/LC_MESSAGES/gtklp.mo > E: gtklp incorrect-locale-subdir /usr/share/locale/cht/LC_MESSAGES/gtklp.mo These seem to be Chinese locales. I suggest removing these three, and notifying upstream about it. (In reply to comment #4) > Couple of quick items: > > 1. Duplicate BuildRequires: openssl-devel (provided by cups-devel) OK > 2. Requires for cups shouldn't be needed, since the devel packages soname should > pull this in. This only pulls the cups libraries in. However gtklp doesn't make sense without the printing system itself. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 7 18:37:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 14:37:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187913] Review Request: mysql-query-browser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605071837.k47IbU9O019582@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mysql-query-browser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187913 ------- Additional Comments From dennis at ausil.us 2006-05-07 14:37 EST ------- i could have sworn i had desktop-file-utils in there. but it is now thanks:) SRPM: http://ausil.us/packages/mysql-query-browser-1.1.18-4.fc5.src.rpm SPEC: http://ausil.us/packages/mysql-query-browser.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 7 19:03:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 15:03:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188369] Review Request: ctapi-cyberjack In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605071903.k47J3aDD024575@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ctapi-cyberjack https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188369 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-05-07 15:03 EST ------- Did you change the -soname option you added to the Makefile to remove the .0 ? Also while we are at it, since upstream doesn't version the ifdhandler I think neither should we, but as for ctapi, we should still at (an unversioned) -soname option to the linkerflags. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 7 19:05:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 15:05:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 178922] Review Request: asterisk - The Open Source PBX In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605071905.k47J5Hux024723@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: asterisk - The Open Source PBX https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=178922 ------- Additional Comments From rmo at sunnmore.net 2006-05-07 15:05 EST ------- (In reply to comment #43) > %changelog > * Tue May 2 2006 Jeffrey C. Ollie - 1.2.7.1-6 > - Zaptel subpackage shouldn't obsolete the sqlite subpackage. > - Remove mISDN until build issues can be figured out. Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found: /etc/asterisk/misdn.conf Seems to be some leftovers :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 7 19:11:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 15:11:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187843] Review Request: phpMyAdmin - Web based MySQL browser written in php In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605071911.k47JBCIJ025729@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: phpMyAdmin - Web based MySQL browser written in php https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187843 mpeters at mac.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mpeters at mac.com ------- Additional Comments From mpeters at mac.com 2006-05-07 15:11 EST ------- Not a formal review - but it looks good to me. I don't know if this is worth worrying about, but it is possible to use phpMyAdmin without httpd (the fedora apache package). It can also be used with thttpd, for example, if thttpd is compiled with the proper php support. At a previous company I worked for, we would do that on MySQL servers that were not web servers, and didn't need the weight of apache installed just to use a web based admin tool for MySQL. I don't think the thttpd in Extras is compiled with php support though (is it?) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 7 20:16:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 16:16:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187318] Review Request: mondo In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605072016.k47KGF9n003292@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mondo https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187318 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|fedora-extras- |fedora-package- |list at redhat.com |review at redhat.com bdpepple at ameritech.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at ameritech.net 2006-05-07 16:16 EST ------- Note that this is not a formal review. Here's a couple of quick items: 1. Don't use all the macros at the top of your spec, it just makes it harder to do any qa on. 2. Drop the additional languages from the spec. 3. Missing ChangeLog. 4. You using a non-standard Group. 5. Duplicate BuildRequires: slang-devel (provided by newt-devel) I would suggest fully reading the packing guidelines on the wiki, since most of these issues are addressed there. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 7 20:28:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 16:28:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190582] Review Request: perl-Module-ScanDeps - Recursively scan Perl code for dependencies In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605072028.k47KSQgo005127@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Module-ScanDeps - Recursively scan Perl code for dependencies https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190582 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-05-07 16:28 EST ------- The source URL seems wrong (or at least I can't fetch the upstream source from there). I could get it from: http://search.cpan.org/CPAN/authors/id/S/SM/SMUELLER/Module-ScanDeps-0.59.tar.gz which I'll assume is the correct upstream. The module puts an executable with a .pl extension into bindir. I agree with Steve that this is a bit ugly but as far as I know it's not a blocker. (My own denyhosts package drops denyhosts.py into bindir so I can't really complain.) Review: * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written, uses macros consistently and follows the Perl specfile template. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. It's not included separately in the package, but this is not necessary as the upstream tarball does not include it. * source files match upstream: 6e20e368ff101d8bc8f31eaa2d81c264 Module-ScanDeps-0.59.tar.gz 6e20e368ff101d8bc8f31eaa2d81c264 Module-ScanDeps-0.59.tar.gz-srpm * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane. * no shared libraries are present. * package is not relocatable. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * %clean is present. * %check is present and all tests pass: All tests successful. Files=1, Tests=20, 2 wallclock secs ( 2.38 cusr + 0.32 csys = 2.70 CPU) * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no libtool .la droppings. * not a GUI app. APPROVED, but please double check the source URL and fix if necessary. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 7 20:43:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 16:43:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 185498] Review Request: gjots2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605072043.k47Khken008367@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gjots2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=185498 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|fedora-extras- |fedora-package- |list at redhat.com |review at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From gemi at bluewin.ch 2006-05-07 16:43 EST ------- You may close this bug now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 7 20:46:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 16:46:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189080] Review Request: perl-Module-Info In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605072046.k47Kk7ao008666@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Module-Info https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189080 steve at silug.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From steve at silug.org 2006-05-07 16:46 EST ------- Imported into CVS, branches created, and builds done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 7 20:46:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 16:46:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189081] Review Request: perl-Test-Prereq In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605072046.k47Kkewi008750@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-Prereq https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189081 Bug 189081 depends on bug 189080, which changed state. Bug 189080 Summary: Review Request: perl-Module-Info https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189080 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 7 20:47:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 16:47:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189081] Review Request: perl-Test-Prereq In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605072047.k47Kljet009068@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-Prereq https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189081 steve at silug.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From steve at silug.org 2006-05-07 16:47 EST ------- Imported into CVS, branches created, and builds requested. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 7 20:48:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 16:48:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189084] Review Request: perl-Graphics-ColorNames In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605072048.k47Km8pJ009198@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Graphics-ColorNames https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189084 Bug 189084 depends on bug 189081, which changed state. Bug 189081 Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-Prereq https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189081 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 7 21:01:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 17:01:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189084] Review Request: perl-Graphics-ColorNames In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605072101.k47L1SI3010989@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Graphics-ColorNames https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189084 steve at silug.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From steve at silug.org 2006-05-07 17:01 EST ------- Imported into CVS, branches created, and builds requested. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 7 21:03:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 17:03:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189048] Review Request: perl-CPANPLUS In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605072103.k47L32Dn011378@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-CPANPLUS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189048 steve at silug.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From steve at silug.org 2006-05-07 17:02 EST ------- Imported into CVS, branches created, and builds requested. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 7 21:09:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 17:09:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190582] Review Request: perl-Module-ScanDeps - Recursively scan Perl code for dependencies In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605072109.k47L92aq012105@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Module-ScanDeps - Recursively scan Perl code for dependencies https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190582 ------- Additional Comments From jpo at di.uminho.pt 2006-05-07 17:09 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > The source URL seems wrong (or at least I can't fetch the upstream source from > there). I could get it from: > http://search.cpan.org/CPAN/authors/id/S/SM/SMUELLER/Module-ScanDeps-0.59.tar.gz > which I'll assume is the correct upstream. I failed to catch the change of the maintainer. I will correct the URL after importing it. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 7 21:09:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 17:09:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188178] Review Request: gauche-gl - OpenGL binding for Gauche In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605072109.k47L9v1S012245@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gauche-gl - OpenGL binding for Gauche https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188178 ------- Additional Comments From gemi at bluewin.ch 2006-05-07 17:09 EST ------- * Brian: how did you do to link to a place in the middle of the wiki page? * In a way it is safer to specify more precisely the info file, because then the package fails when /usr/share/info/dir had been installed. * The package is build specifially for a version of gauche, if there is a new version, the package has to be rebuilt. * I decided to leave the directory ".packages". There are many other packages that have dotted directories, for example eclipse... * The run files in the doc directories are not necessary, I removed them. * Normally the header file should not be necessary. I removed it. Maybe there is a case when one wants to develop a plugin in C that uses native functionality from gauche-gl, but this seems a bit farfetched. http://math.ifi.unizh.ch/fedora/5/i386/SRPMS.gemi/gauche-gl-0.4.1-4.fc5.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 7 21:27:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 17:27:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 176374] Review Request: nagios-plugins In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605072127.k47LR2KU014340@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nagios-plugins https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176374 martin at zepler.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |martin at zepler.org ------- Additional Comments From martin at zepler.org 2006-05-07 17:26 EST ------- I've just built this package and some of the plugins wouldn't install due to a dependency on /usr/local/bin/perl. Turns out configure has found a symlink to /usr/bin/perl I put there to make some random perl scripts run. It would seem sensible for the package to enforce the correct perl by adding this to the configure line: --with-perl=%{_bindir}/perl There's a few other --with parameters which could be similarly helpful. On the other hand, seems to be working well on fc5 x86_64. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 7 21:33:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 17:33:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190937] Review Request: perl-Module-Install In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605072133.k47LXboJ016029@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Module-Install https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190937 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |tibbs at math.uh.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 7 21:39:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 17:39:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 176374] Review Request: nagios-plugins In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605072139.k47LdkBF017368@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nagios-plugins https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176374 jpo at di.uminho.pt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jpo at di.uminho.pt ------- Additional Comments From jpo at di.uminho.pt 2006-05-07 17:39 EST ------- Mike, Could you update nagios-plugins to version 1.4.3 (released last month). TIA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 7 22:08:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 18:08:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190991] New: Review Request: libpar2 Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190991 Summary: Review Request: libpar2 Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: laurent.rineau__fc_extra at normalesup.org QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.di.ens.fr/~rineau/Fedora/libpar2.spec SRPM URL: http://www.di.ens.fr/~rineau/Fedora/libpar2-0.2-1.src.rpm Description: PAR 2.0 compatible file verification and repair library libpar2 is a library for creating and using PAR2 files to detect damage in data files and repair them if necessary. PAR2 files are usually published in binary newsgroups on Usenet; they apply the data-recovery capability concepts of RAID-like systems to the posting and recovery of multi-part archives. libpar2 is a required by gpar2. Notice: I need a sponsor. As a matter of fact, this is not my first review request: par2cmdline (bug #190070) has been accepted, but i forgot to tell it was my first request. Actually, I discovered that par2cmdline code is two year old, while libpar2 (same authors) is still maintained and improved. I will submit of request for gpar2, a par2 graphical client, in a few minutes. I suggest that the two request are reviewed in a whole. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 7 22:09:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 18:09:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190992] New: Review Request: gpar2 Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190992 Summary: Review Request: gpar2 Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: laurent.rineau__fc_extra at normalesup.org QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.di.ens.fr/~rineau/Fedora/gpar2.spec SRPM URL: http://www.di.ens.fr/~rineau/Fedora/gpar2-0.3-1.src.rpm Description: PAR 2.0 compatible file verification and repair tool gpar2 is a Gtk+ GUI for creating and using PAR2 files to detect damage in data files and repair them if necessary. PAR2 files are usually published in binary newsgroups on Usenet; they apply the data-recovery capability concepts of RAID-like systems to the posting and recovery of multi-part archives. Notice: I need a sponsor. I already have submitted a request, par2cmdline (#190070), that has been accepted, but i forgot to tell I need a sponsor. This GUI depends on libpar2, that is the subject of another request (bug #190991). I suggest that these two requests are reviewed in a whole. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 7 22:11:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 18:11:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190991] Review Request: libpar2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605072211.k47MB4iH021936@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libpar2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190991 laurent.rineau__fc_extra at normalesup.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tibbs at math.uh.edu ------- Additional Comments From laurent.rineau__fc_extra at normalesup.org 2006-05-07 18:10 EST ------- gpar2 request is bug #190992. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 7 22:15:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 18:15:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190991] Review Request: libpar2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605072215.k47MFOtF022667@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libpar2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190991 laurent.rineau__fc_extra at normalesup.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 7 22:15:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 18:15:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190992] Review Request: gpar2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605072215.k47MF91m022552@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gpar2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190992 laurent.rineau__fc_extra at normalesup.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 7 22:16:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 18:16:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190992] Review Request: gpar2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605072216.k47MGTJs022860@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gpar2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190992 laurent.rineau__fc_extra at normalesup.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |190991 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 7 22:16:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 18:16:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190991] Review Request: libpar2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605072216.k47MGqV2022908@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libpar2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190991 laurent.rineau__fc_extra at normalesup.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |190992 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 7 22:17:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 18:17:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190992] Review Request: gpar2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605072217.k47MH33O022945@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gpar2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190992 laurent.rineau__fc_extra at normalesup.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |190991 OtherBugsDependingO|190991 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 7 22:17:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 18:17:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190937] Review Request: perl-Module-Install In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605072217.k47MHEfE022975@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Module-Install https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190937 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-05-07 18:17 EST ------- The source URL seems to be wrong; is upstream really on your site? CPAN says http://search.cpan.org/CPAN/authors/id/A/AD/ADAMK/Module-Install-0.62.tar.gz, which I'll take as upstream for the purposes fo this review. One of the tests spits out some warnings because various utilities are missing; is it worth adding additional BR:s to get more coverage? Review: * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written, uses macros consistently and follows the Perl specfile template. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. It's not included separately in the package, but this is not necessary as the upstream tarball does not include it. * source files match upstream: 92eda243d936f4010883825aa2dd2993 Module-Install-0.62.tar.gz 92eda243d936f4010883825aa2dd2993 Module-Install-0.62.tar.gz-srpm * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane (many manual Requires: not picked by rpmlint). * no shared libraries are present. * package is not relocatable. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * %clean is present. * %check is present and all tests pass: All tests successful. Files=4, Tests=51, 2 wallclock secs ( 0.58 cusr + 0.26 csys = 0.84 CPU) * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no libtool .la droppings. * not a GUI app. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 7 22:17:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 18:17:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190991] Review Request: libpar2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605072217.k47MHZYs023073@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libpar2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190991 laurent.rineau__fc_extra at normalesup.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn|190992 | OtherBugsDependingO| |190992 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 7 22:32:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 18:32:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 165311] Review Request: Tiger, security auditing on UNIX systems In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605072232.k47MWF0g025283@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Tiger, security auditing on UNIX systems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=165311 ------- Additional Comments From gauret at free.fr 2006-05-07 18:32 EST ------- Thanks a lot for reviewing ! I'm not planning on updating this package here unless a new upstream version comes out, which should not happen soon. This is the oldest open review request, I'm glad it comes to an end :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 7 22:43:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 18:43:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 183439] Review Request: papyrus (Canvas drawing library based on cairo/cairomm) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605072243.k47MhnNf027673@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: papyrus (Canvas drawing library based on cairo/cairomm) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183439 ------- Additional Comments From rvinyard at cs.nmsu.edu 2006-05-07 18:43 EST ------- New release, and the dependency on Idioskopos is now removed. With this release and cairomm now in FE, all dependencies are met in FE-5. Spec Name or Url: http://miskatonic.cs.nmsu.edu/pub/papyrus.spec SRPM Name or Url: http://miskatonic.cs.nmsu.edu/pub/fedora/5/srpms/papyrus-0.1.11-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 7 22:44:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 18:44:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 169345] Review Request: SEC - Simple Event Correlator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605072244.k47MirJI027801@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: SEC - Simple Event Correlator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=169345 ------- Additional Comments From jpo at di.uminho.pt 2006-05-07 18:44 EST ------- Didier, The pid file mentioned in the init script isn't created by default. It needs to be added to the sec.sysconfig file: -pid=/var/run/sec.pid The pidfile is needed to add a logrotate file like the following example: /etc/logrotate.d/sec -------------------- /var/log/sec { missingok notifempty sharedscripts postrotate /bin/kill -HUP `cat /var/run/sec.pid 2> /dev/null` 2> /dev/null || true endscript } -------------------- I still need to make a couple more logrotate tests to see if everything is working correctly and I also need to take a look at perl source code as some log lines appear to have been writen as '...\n' instead of "...\n". jpo -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 7 23:08:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 19:08:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190070] Review Request: par2cmdline In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605072308.k47N8hXY030946@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: par2cmdline https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190070 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-05-07 19:08 EST ------- I will sponsor you; you can go ahead and set up your Fedora account. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 7 23:32:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 19:32:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 169345] Review Request: SEC - Simple Event Correlator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605072332.k47NWf6F002015@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: SEC - Simple Event Correlator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=169345 ------- Additional Comments From jpo at di.uminho.pt 2006-05-07 19:32 EST ------- The log problems appear to be related to the following line shellcmd /bin/echo -- "\n%t %s : $0\n" >> %int_logfile;\ in the file "001_init.sec" -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 7 23:41:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 19:41:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189452] Review Request: perl-Curses - Curses bindings for perl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605072341.k47NfK6b003941@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Curses - Curses bindings for perl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189452 michael at knox.net.nz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163779 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 8 00:47:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 20:47:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 173722] Review Request: stratagus - Real-time strategy gaming engine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605080047.k480lVoK014190@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: stratagus - Real-time strategy gaming engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173722 ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2006-05-07 20:47 EST ------- Since this is now imported and built, can we close this bug? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 8 00:48:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 20:48:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 176374] Review Request: nagios-plugins In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605080048.k480mo6l014334@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nagios-plugins https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176374 ------- Additional Comments From imlinux at gmail.com 2006-05-07 20:48 EST ------- Sorry about that, the Nagios people have been really busy lately :-D. All updated: SRPM: http://mmcgrath.net/~mmcgrath/nagios/nagios-plugins-1.4.3-1.src.rpm SPEC: http://mmcgrath.net/~mmcgrath/nagios/nagios-plugins.spec Its also been requested that I build some i386 bin's for people to use. i386: http://mmcgrath.net/~mmcgrath/nagios/i386/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 8 00:50:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 20:50:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 176374] Review Request: nagios-plugins In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605080050.k480opJp014776@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nagios-plugins https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176374 imlinux at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From imlinux at gmail.com 2006-05-07 20:50 EST ------- Sorry, I'm removing FE-NEEDSPONSOR, I've been sponsored -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 8 01:12:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 21:12:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190471] Review Request: yakuake - Quake-style terminal emulator for KDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605080112.k481Caav018039@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: yakuake - Quake-style terminal emulator for KDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190471 hugo at devin.com.br changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163779 |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 8 01:13:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 21:13:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190997] New: Review Request: linux-wlan-ng Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190997 Summary: Review Request: linux-wlan-ng Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: redhat at flyn.org QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.flyn.org/SRPMS/linux-wlan-ng.spec SRPM URL: http://www.flyn.org/SRPMS/linux-wlan-ng-0.2.3-1.src.rpm Description: The linux-wlan package is a linux device driver and subsystem package that is intended to provide the full range of IEEE 802.11 MAC management capabilities for use in user-mode utilities and scripts. The package currently supports the Intersil 802.11b Prism2, Prism2.5, and Prism3 reference designs for PCMCIA, PCI, and USB. Additionally, the package includes support for PLX9052 based PCI to PCMCIA adapter with a few different PCMCIA cards. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 8 01:29:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 21:29:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190997] Review Request: linux-wlan-ng In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605080129.k481T2w0022220@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: linux-wlan-ng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190997 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-05-07 21:28 EST ------- This doesn't seem to follow the current kernel module system documented in http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/KernelModuleProposal Any particular reason why not? I think there will be a large number of blockers otherwise. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 8 01:34:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 21:34:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190705] Review Request: perl-Test-Base In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605080134.k481YhFd024173@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-Base https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190705 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |tibbs at math.uh.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 8 01:42:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 21:42:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 180319] Review Request: svnmailer - Tool to post subversion repository commit information In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605080142.k481gDth026529@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: svnmailer - Tool to post subversion repository commit information https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=180319 mfleming+rpm at enlartenment.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From mfleming+rpm at enlartenment.com 2006-05-07 21:42 EST ------- Imported and a build request on the devel branch queued -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 8 02:01:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 22:01:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190705] Review Request: perl-Test-Base In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605080201.k4821uoV031817@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-Base https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190705 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-05-07 22:01 EST ------- You might consider adding BuildRequires: perl(Algorithm::Diff), perl(Text::Diff), perl(YAML) for slightly better test coverage. Review: * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written, uses macros consistently and follows the Perl specfile template. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. It's not included separately in the package, but this is not necessary as the upstream tarball does not include it. * source files match upstream: 1917571661a8302626a8c82eb047f941 Test-Base-0.50.tar.gz 1917571661a8302626a8c82eb047f941 Test-Base-0.50.tar.gz-srpm * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane. * no shared libraries are present. * package is not relocatable. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * %clean is present. * %check is present and all tests pass: All tests successful, 3 tests and 4 subtests skipped. Files=98, Tests=418, 6 wallclock secs ( 4.71 cusr + 1.49 csys = 6.20 CPU) * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no libtool .la droppings. * not a GUI app. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 8 02:06:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 22:06:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191005] New: Review Request: glob2 - Realtime Strategy game Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191005 Summary: Review Request: glob2 - Realtime Strategy game Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: brkamikaze at gmail.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.sendspace.com/file/i4udak SRPM URL: http://www.sendspace.com/file/yd9bk8 Description: Globulation2 is a realtime strategy game designed with a new approach on micromanagement. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 8 02:20:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 22:20:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191005] Review Request: glob2 - Realtime Strategy game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605080220.k482K5QD003501@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glob2 - Realtime Strategy game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191005 bdpepple at ameritech.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at ameritech.net 2006-05-07 22:20 EST ------- Couple of quick items: 1. In the files section, you need to use macros instead of hard-coding the path. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-255d52ff18f82fa184a32946b82ed81e4fd8885a 2. The desktop file is not handled correctly. 3. The documentation (AUTHORS file) is not handled correctly. 4. Instead of listing every file, you should use a less verbose method (ie. %{_datadir}/pixmaps/*.png). 5. A lot of your Requires aren't necessary, since the BuildRequires sonames will cause these to be pulled in automatically. Most of the solutions to these issues can be found on the wiki. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 8 02:29:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 22:29:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 172969] Package fixes and cleanups for gnome-system-monitor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605080229.k482TlTn005154@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Package fixes and cleanups for gnome-system-monitor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=172969 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-05-07 22:29 EST ------- I'm confused (which in itself is not terribly surprising). Just what is to be reviewed here? Should this be blocking FC-NEW instead? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 8 03:13:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 23:13:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190705] Review Request: perl-Test-Base In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605080313.k483D1cR012521@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-Base https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190705 jpo at di.uminho.pt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jpo at di.uminho.pt ------- Additional Comments From jpo at di.uminho.pt 2006-05-07 23:12 EST ------- I've some reservations about the approval of this module. It appears to have several optional/missing Requirements and BR. BR: Text::Diff, YAML Req: Text::Diff, LWP::Simple, YAML I think we should at least BuildRequires: perl(Text::Diff) and Requires: perl(Text::Diff), perl(LWP::Simple) Note: IIRC the new version of YAML requires Test::Base => may cause circular dependencies problems. Note2: It's 4:00am. I will give another look at this module in a few hours. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 8 03:15:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 23:15:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 173722] Review Request: stratagus - Real-time strategy gaming engine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605080315.k483FNc2012832@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: stratagus - Real-time strategy gaming engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173722 ------- Additional Comments From lemenkov at newmail.ru 2006-05-07 23:15 EST ------- (In reply to comment #19) > Since this is now imported and built, can we close this bug? Closed. I'll try to pack some datasets. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 8 03:16:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 23:16:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 173722] Review Request: stratagus - Real-time strategy gaming engine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605080316.k483GKIE013008@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: stratagus - Real-time strategy gaming engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173722 lemenkov at newmail.ru changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|REOPENED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 8 03:36:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 23:36:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191014] New: Review Request: ganymed Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191014 Summary: Review Request: ganymed Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: robert at marcanoonline.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.marcanoonline.com/downloads/fedora/package_submissions/subclipse/ganymed.spec SRPM URL: http://www.marcanoonline.com/downloads/fedora/package_submissions/subclipse/ganymed-209-1.src.rpm Description: Ganymed SSH-2 for Java is a library which implements the SSH-2 protocol in pure Java (tested on J2SE 1.4.2 and 5.0). It allows one to connect to SSH servers from within Java programs. It supports SSH sessions (remote command execution and shell access), local and remote port forwarding, local stream forwarding, X11 forwarding and SCP. There are no dependencies on any JCE provider, as all crypto functionality is included Note: This package is required by subclipse, a Subversion plugin for eclipse -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 8 03:39:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 23:39:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191015] New: Review Request: javasvn Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191015 Summary: Review Request: javasvn Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: robert at marcanoonline.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.marcanoonline.com/downloads/fedora/package_submissions/subclipse/javasvn.spec SRPM URL: http://www.marcanoonline.com/downloads/fedora/package_submissions/subclipse/javasvn-1.0.4-1.src.rpm Description: JavaSVN is a pure Java Subversion client library. You would like to use JavaSVN when you need to access or modify Subversion repository from your Java application, be it a standalone program, plugin or web application. Being a pure Java program, JavaSVN doesn't need any additional configuration or native binaries to work on any OS that runs Java -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 8 03:41:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 23:41:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191015] Review Request: javasvn In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605080341.k483fbTr018371@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: javasvn https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191015 robert at marcanoonline.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |191014 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 8 03:41:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 23:41:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191014] Review Request: ganymed In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605080341.k483fcQq018388@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ganymed https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191014 robert at marcanoonline.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |191015 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 8 03:43:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 23:43:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191016] New: Review Request: svn-client-adapter Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191016 Summary: Review Request: svn-client-adapter Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: robert at marcanoonline.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.marcanoonline.com/downloads/fedora/package_submissions/subclipse/svn-client-adapter.spec SRPM URL: http://www.marcanoonline.com/downloads/fedora/package_submissions/subclipse/svn-client-adapter-0.9.35-2.r1632.src.rpm Description: svn-client-adapter is a high level java API for subversion. SvnClientAdapter can use either javahl interface (uses JNI, the faster approach) or the command line interface -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 8 03:43:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 23:43:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190705] Review Request: perl-Test-Base In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605080343.k483hurj018884@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-Base https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190705 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-05-07 23:43 EST ------- You'll note I suggested the addition of those BR:s, but all they add is additional test coverage. As far as I know, we have no policy on optional requirements. I suppose there's no harm in adding them as long as they're small and we have repoclosure, but I would argue that it would be a terrible idea to dictate that all optional requirements be made mandatory. So I would leave it up to the maintainer. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 8 03:44:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 23:44:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191016] Review Request: svn-client-adapter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605080344.k483irLZ018963@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: svn-client-adapter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191016 robert at marcanoonline.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: svn-client- |Review Request: svn-client- |adapter |adapter BugsThisDependsOn| |191014, 191015 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 8 03:45:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 23:45:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191015] Review Request: javasvn In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605080345.k483j4tF019062@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: javasvn https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191015 robert at marcanoonline.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |191016 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 8 03:44:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 23:44:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 176374] Review Request: nagios-plugins In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605080344.k483iuwJ019008@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nagios-plugins https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176374 ------- Additional Comments From paul at xtdnet.nl 2006-05-07 23:44 EST ------- cool. then you should put the package in FE and close this bug. I'm happy to see nagios-plugins got in FE now. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 8 03:45:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 23:45:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191014] Review Request: ganymed In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605080345.k483jFxD019191@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ganymed https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191014 robert at marcanoonline.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |191016 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 8 03:46:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 23:46:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187318] Review Request: mondo In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605080346.k483kLWM019373@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mondo https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187318 ------- Additional Comments From dennis at ausil.us 2006-05-07 23:46 EST ------- in addition to above you need to fill in the changelog. the source needs the full http:// or ftp:// url generally package builds start at 1 not 454. it is recommeneded to use disttags. you have alot of duplicate requires rpm is smart enough to pick up shared objects that are linked. looks like it requires mindi but it is not available it seems to be submitted bug #187317 you should block this bug also. you need to own all the files/directories you create why is there executable files in %{_datadir} ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 8 03:46:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 23:46:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191017] New: Review Request: subclipse Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191017 Summary: Review Request: subclipse Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: robert at marcanoonline.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.marcanoonline.com/downloads/fedora/package_submissions/subclipse/subclipse.spec SRPM URL: http://www.marcanoonline.com/downloads/fedora/package_submissions/subclipse/subclipse-1.0.1-2.src.rpm Description: Subclipse is an Eclipse plugin that adds Subversion integration to the Eclipse IDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 8 03:48:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 23:48:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191017] Review Request: subclipse In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605080348.k483m0r8019779@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: subclipse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191017 robert at marcanoonline.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |191014 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 8 03:48:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 23:48:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191017] Review Request: subclipse In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605080348.k483mCr4019831@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: subclipse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191017 robert at marcanoonline.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |191015, 191016 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 8 03:48:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 23:48:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191014] Review Request: ganymed In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605080348.k483mClP019825@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ganymed https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191014 robert at marcanoonline.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |191017 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 8 03:48:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 23:48:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191015] Review Request: javasvn In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605080348.k483mNqC019857@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: javasvn https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191015 robert at marcanoonline.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |191017 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 8 03:48:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 23:48:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191016] Review Request: svn-client-adapter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605080348.k483mYQu019881@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: svn-client-adapter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191016 robert at marcanoonline.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |191017 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 8 03:58:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 23:58:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 180743] Review Request: pdsh In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605080358.k483wdlG021385@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pdsh https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=180743 michael at knox.net.nz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From michael at knox.net.nz 2006-05-07 23:58 EST ------- Please remember to close reviews once they have been approved and pushed out into extras. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 8 04:07:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 00:07:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187317] Review Request: mindi In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605080407.k4847mBM022773@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mindi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187317 dennis at ausil.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dennis at ausil.us ------- Additional Comments From dennis at ausil.us 2006-05-08 00:07 EST ------- rpmlint errors W: mindi unreasonable-epoch 495 W: mindi incoherent-version-in-changelog 1.0.7 495:1.0.7-495.fc5 E: mindi statically-linked-binary /usr/lib/mindi/rootfs/bin/busybox.net E: mindi statically-linked-binary /usr/lib/mindi/rootfs/bin/busybox W: mindi dangling-relative-symlink /usr/lib/mindi/rootfs/sbin/parted2fdisk fdisk W: mindi dangling-symlink /usr/sbin/parted2fdisk /sbin/fdisk W: mindi hidden-file-or-dir /usr/lib/mindi/rootfs/root/.profile W: mindi hidden-file-or-dir /usr/lib/mindi/rootfs/proc/.keep as well as alot of duplicate file warnings -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 8 04:11:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 00:11:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189402] Review Request: bogofilter - Fast anti-spam filtering by Bayesian statistical analysis In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605080411.k484BQik023195@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bogofilter - Fast anti-spam filtering by Bayesian statistical analysis https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189402 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-05-08 00:11 EST ------- Since this has been imported and built, I am going to close this review with NEXTRELEASE... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 8 04:11:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 00:11:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 176542] Review Request: gnome-yum - GNOME interface for YUM In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605080411.k484BYW7023215@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-yum - GNOME interface for YUM https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176542 michael at knox.net.nz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From michael at knox.net.nz 2006-05-08 00:11 EST ------- package is in the repos. Clsoing bug. Please remember to close package reviews once they have been imported into cvs etc etc -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 8 04:18:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 00:18:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191014] Review Request: ganymed In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605080418.k484I05k024223@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ganymed https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191014 ------- Additional Comments From green at redhat.com 2006-05-08 00:17 EST ------- Hi Robert - this is cool, thanks. I'm no expert, but here are some comments based on the feedback I've received from my review experiences... * Why have all those macro definitions, conditional and otherwise, at the top instead of just... %define gcj_support 1 ? * I've been using %{?dist} in Release tags, like Release: 1%{?dist} * There's a preference to not use macros in Source0. It's something somebody should be able to wget directly. * Missing '.' at the end of %description. * Single line %post[un] bits should look like this... %post -p %{_bindir}/rebuild-gcj-db %postun -p %{_bindir}/rebuild-gcj-db (rpmlint will complain about this) Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 8 04:18:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 00:18:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 185262] Review Request: kchmviewer - CHM viewer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605080418.k484IuXS024332@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kchmviewer - CHM viewer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=185262 michael at knox.net.nz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From michael at knox.net.nz 2006-05-08 00:18 EST ------- package is in extras. Please remember to close package reviews once approved and imported into cvs etc etc -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 8 04:20:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 00:20:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190267] Review Request: raidem-music - Background music for the game raidem In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605080420.k484Kv9W024661@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: raidem-music - Background music for the game raidem https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190267 michael at knox.net.nz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From michael at knox.net.nz 2006-05-08 00:20 EST ------- package is in extras. Please remember to close package review once its been imported into cvs etc etc -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 8 04:26:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 00:26:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 166255] Review Request: Sprog In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605080426.k484Q6ds025490@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Sprog https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=166255 michael at knox.net.nz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From michael at knox.net.nz 2006-05-08 00:25 EST ------- package is imported and built... PLEASE remember to close package review when imported into cvs etc -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 8 04:28:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 00:28:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 166253] Review Request: perl-Gtk2-GladeXML In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605080428.k484SZxV025976@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Gtk2-GladeXML https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=166253 michael at knox.net.nz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 8 04:29:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 00:29:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 166251] Review Request: perl-Apache-LogRegex In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605080429.k484TFlr026100@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Apache-LogRegex https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=166251 michael at knox.net.nz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|REOPENED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 8 04:34:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 00:34:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190362] Review Request: unifdef In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605080434.k484Y8B3027356@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: unifdef https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190362 michael at knox.net.nz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From michael at knox.net.nz 2006-05-08 00:33 EST ------- Package has been imported. Please remember to close package reviews once accepted and imported. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 8 04:49:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 00:49:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 165689] Review Request: SquidGuard: filter, redirector and access controller plugin for squid In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605080449.k484nQFJ030341@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: SquidGuard: filter, redirector and access controller plugin for squid https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=165689 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From michael at knox.net.nz 2006-05-08 00:49 EST ------- In the future, can packages that have been "given up on" by someone please be added to the orphan page? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/OrphanedPackages This will hopefully allow for a swifter take over. Has been added now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 8 06:04:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 02:04:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190267] Review Request: raidem-music - Background music for the game raidem In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605080604.k4864Erq010043@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: raidem-music - Background music for the game raidem https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190267 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-05-08 02:04 EST ------- Oops sorry, I normally always close them I missed this one I also didn't see it on the Need cleanup part of the weekly automatic Fedora Status thingie, I guess I read over it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 8 07:24:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 03:24:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189197] Review Request: gtk2hs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605080724.k487OCgk024406@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtk2hs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189197 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: ghc-gtk2hs |Review Request: gtk2hs -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 8 08:27:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 04:27:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 171040] Review Request: postgis In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605080827.k488R4ME006966@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: postgis https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=171040 noa at resare.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |noa at resare.com ------- Additional Comments From noa at resare.com 2006-05-08 04:27 EST ------- Had a look at the 1.1.1-1 spec 1) Please remove the patch that is not used, the patch0-line and the old make line 2) This pacakge does not install shared libraries in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, so ldconfig should not be called. on post and postun 3) Include a reference to where to download the release .tar.gz in the Source line http://postgis.refractions.net/ seems down at the moment, so I can't verify the package upstream. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 8 08:37:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 04:37:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188369] Review Request: ctapi-cyberjack In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605080837.k488bgYq010021@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ctapi-cyberjack https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188369 ------- Additional Comments From frank-buettner at gmx.net 2006-05-08 04:37 EST ------- So now the lib will be find again:) Here the package http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/qsmartcard/ctapi-cyberjack-2.0.8-9FC5.src.rpm?download -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 8 09:00:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 05:00:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190991] Review Request: libpar2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605080900.k4890RDK015818@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libpar2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190991 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2006-05-08 05:00 EST ------- Some comments: 1. Minor issues: 1.1 # rpmlint *RPMS/libpar*.rpm E: libpar2-debuginfo script-without-shellbang /usr/src/debug/libpar2-0.2/galois.h E: libpar2-debuginfo script-without-shellbang /usr/src/debug/libpar2-0.2/par2repairersourcefile.cpp E: libpar2-debuginfo script-without-shellbang /usr/src/debug/libpar2-0.2/par2repairer.cpp E: libpar2-debuginfo script-without-shellbang /usr/src/debug/libpar2-0.2/par2repairersourcefile.h E: libpar2-debuginfo script-without-shellbang /usr/src/debug/libpar2-0.2/par1repairer.cpp E: libpar2-devel only-non-binary-in-usr-lib Most of these probably are caused by bogus permissions on source files. 1.2 Empty directory /usr/lib/libpar2 Is this package supposed to take plugins, there? 2. Major: This package's configuration (configure.ac/Makefile.am) is bugged: - configure.ac uses PKG_CHECK_MODULES(..sigc++..) but doesn't propagate the results to Makefile.am. Instead the Makefile explicitly links against -lstdc++. This violates g++'s working principles. Linking against -lstdc++ is a g++ internal detail. 3. Severe (Blocker): The package installs an autoheader (config.h) to a public directory (/usr/lib/libpar2/include/config.h). This file's contents will clash with other package's config headers and is a severe (must fix) design flaw of this package. A package must not install an autoheader. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 8 09:51:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 05:51:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 186391] Review Request: 855resolution - Change video bios resolutions on laptops with Intel graphic chipsets In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605080951.k489p8uU026287@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: 855resolution - Change video bios resolutions on laptops with Intel graphic chipsets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=186391 bnocera at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |katzj at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From bnocera at redhat.com 2006-05-08 05:50 EST ------- Jeremy, is your intel-with-modesetting driver RPM ok for use? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 8 10:34:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 06:34:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190949] Review Request: gaim-gaym In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605081034.k48AYDJN003090@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gaim-gaym https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190949 ------- Additional Comments From noa at resare.com 2006-05-08 06:34 EST ------- The src.rpm gives a 404 Just a quick note on the .spec file. The Requires: gtk2 is probably redundant. rpmbuild will normally find out the correct library dependencies automagically -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 8 11:00:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 07:00:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191036] New: Review Request: libmp4v2 a library for handling the mp4 container format Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191036 Summary: Review Request: libmp4v2 a library for handling the mp4 container format Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: noa at resare.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://resare.com/noa/fedora-extras/libmp4v2.spec SRPM URL: http://resare.com/noa/fedora-extras/libmp4v2-1.4.1-1.src.rpm Description: The libmp4v2 library provides an abstraction layer for working with files using the mp4 container format. This library is developed by mpeg4ip project and is an exact copy of the library distributed in the mpeg4ip package. This is my first extras package, and I'm looking for a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 8 11:02:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 07:02:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191036] Review Request: libmp4v2 a library for handling the mp4 container format In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605081102.k48B2EnR008705@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libmp4v2 a library for handling the mp4 container format https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191036 noa at resare.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 8 11:11:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 07:11:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190066] Review Request: php-pear-Mail In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605081111.k48BBIxU010037@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Mail https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190066 ------- Additional Comments From gauret at free.fr 2006-05-08 07:11 EST ------- The PHP package uses "The PHP License" in the License tag, please do the same (avoids one rpmlint error) Detail: in %install there is a php error message (it's just a notice, but there might be a real problem beneath): Notice: Undefined variable: php_dir in PEAR/Installer.php on line 1160 and 1161 Otherwise, it looks good to me. We'll have to wait until bug 190252 is fixed to publish it of course. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 8 11:44:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 07:44:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 186811] Review Request: libnfnetlink - Netfilter netlink userspace library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605081144.k48BiXgV017113@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libnfnetlink - Netfilter netlink userspace library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=186811 bugzilla.redhat at neufeind.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bugzilla.redhat at neufeind.net ------- Additional Comments From bugzilla.redhat at neufeind.net 2006-05-08 07:44 EST ------- So to my understanding there is nothing really preventing a release in extras, since the gpl-text can be added to the package without it being upstream as well for now. Or is there something I could do to actually move this topic (release in extras) forward? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 8 11:47:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 07:47:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191036] Review Request: libmp4v2 a library for handling the mp4 container format In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605081147.k48BlaO1017703@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libmp4v2 a library for handling the mp4 container format https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191036 ------- Additional Comments From mpeters at mac.com 2006-05-08 07:47 EST ------- I can't sponsor, but some notes: --- %files %doc COPYING %defattr(-,root,root,-) %{_bindir}/* %{_libdir}/*.so.* --- Normally - %doc goes below %defattr line --- %files devel %doc README TODO INTERNALS API_CHANGES %doc %{_mandir}/man?/* %{_includedir}/*.h %{_libdir}/*.a %{_libdir}/*.so --- You nead a defattr line here. Don't use %doc with %{_mandir} - it isn't necessary. Don't package the static library (unless you know you need it) ---- I see shared libraries - but don't see ldconfig run in %post or %postun. Changelog version refers to lvn - it should just be 1.4.1-1 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 8 11:53:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 07:53:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191036] Review Request: libmp4v2 a library for handling the mp4 container format In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605081153.k48BrGFh018776@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libmp4v2 a library for handling the mp4 container format https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191036 ------- Additional Comments From mpeters at mac.com 2006-05-08 07:53 EST ------- On another note - this package will conflict with faad2 from rpm.livna.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 8 12:10:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 08:10:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191040] New: Review Request: fedora-package-config-apt - Configuration files for the apt package manager Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191040 Summary: Review Request: fedora-package-config-apt - Configuration files for the apt package manager Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~athimm/fedorasubmit/fedora-package-config-apt.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~athimm/fedorasubmit/fedora-package-config-apt-5.89-1.src.rpm Description: This package contains configuration files for apt. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 8 12:24:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 08:24:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191036] Review Request: libmp4v2 a library for handling the mp4 container format In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605081224.k48CO9E3024608@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libmp4v2 a library for handling the mp4 container format https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191036 ------- Additional Comments From noa at resare.com 2006-05-08 08:24 EST ------- Thanks an updated version is posted at http://resare.com/noa/fedora-extras/libmp4v2-1.4.1-2.src.rpm http://resare.com/noa/fedora-extras/libmp4v2.spec I know that this conflicts with livna. Including this in extras i part of my grand plan to get an updated faad2 into livna (newer faad2 lacks the libmp4v2 component) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 8 12:25:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 08:25:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188369] Review Request: ctapi-cyberjack In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605081225.k48CPZu7024903@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ctapi-cyberjack https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188369 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-05-08 08:25 EST ------- MUST: ===== * rpmlint output is: W: ctapi-cyberjack one-line-command-in-%postun /sbin/ldconfig This one needs fixing, replace: %postun /sbin/ldconfig with: %postun -p /sbin/ldconfig The same goes for %post, but rpmlint doesn't detect that one? W: ctapi-cyberjack-devel no-documentation W: ctapi-cyberjack-pcsc no-documentation These may be ignored * Package and spec file named appropriately * Packaged according to packaging guidelines * License (GPL) ok, license file included * spec file is legible and in Am. English. * Source matches upstream * Compiles and builds on devel-x86_64 & devel-i386 * BR: ok * No locales * Shared libraries, ldconfig is run * Not relocatable * Package owns / or requires all dirs * No duplicate files & Permissions ok * %clean & macro usage OK * Contains code only * %doc does not affect runtime, and isn't large enough to warrent a sub package * -devel package for the .h file(s) * no gui -> no .desktop file required MUST fix: ========= * Replace: %postun /sbin/ldconfig with: %postun -p /sbin/ldconfig The same goes for %post. * The pcsc ifd gets installed as /libcyberjack_ifd.so which is ofcourse not correct. Should fix: =========== * You could replace sed -e '....' aap > aap.tmp; mv aap.tmp aap with: sed -i '....' aap * %package pcsc is missing the following Requires: Requires(post): /usr/sbin/update-reader.conf Requires(postun): /usr/sbin/update-reader.conf Although this does get provides by the Requires: pcsc-lite, why this Requires? Wouldn't the above 2 be better? Concider yourself sponsored, feel free to create an account in the account system and sign the CLA I'll sponsor you once thats done. I'm awaiting the next and hopefully final revision of this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 8 12:30:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 08:30:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 173459] Review Request: initng In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605081230.k48CUFWD025786@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 daner964 at student.liu.se changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #128252|0 |1 is obsolete| | ------- Additional Comments From daner964 at student.liu.se 2006-05-08 08:30 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=128739) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=128739&action=view) initng 0.6.4-1 spec file - New upstream version - Added lib config flag to cmake - Removed CODING_STANDARDS and FAQ that doesn't exist anymore Anyone got any solution to the chicken-egg problem? Does initng-devel really need initng? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 8 12:36:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 08:36:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 173459] Review Request: initng In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605081236.k48Ca5on027519@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 daner964 at student.liu.se changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #128285|0 |1 is obsolete| | ------- Additional Comments From daner964 at student.liu.se 2006-05-08 08:35 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=128740) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=128740&action=view) initng-ifiles 0.0.3.2-1 spec file -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 8 13:00:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 09:00:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188369] Review Request: ctapi-cyberjack In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605081300.k48D031W032323@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ctapi-cyberjack https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188369 ------- Additional Comments From frank-buettner at gmx.net 2006-05-08 08:59 EST ------- What so you men with "The pcsc ifd gets installed as /laibcyberjck_ifd.so which is ofcourse not" The file will not be direct under root. on FC5 the file will be put in "pkg-config libpcsclite --variable=usbdropdir"/laibcyberjck_ifd.so and on FC in {_libdir}/readers/laibcyberjck_ifd.so -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 8 13:01:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 09:01:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188369] Review Request: ctapi-cyberjack In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605081301.k48D1JtR032598@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ctapi-cyberjack https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188369 ------- Additional Comments From frank-buettner at gmx.net 2006-05-08 09:01 EST ------- I an account but some one has suspend it:( -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 8 13:25:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 09:25:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 176374] Review Request: nagios-plugins In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605081325.k48DP5sr006235@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nagios-plugins https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176374 ------- Additional Comments From imlinux at gmail.com 2006-05-08 09:24 EST ------- I've been sponsored but this package has not yet been approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 8 13:28:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 09:28:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188542] Review Request: hylafax In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605081328.k48DSxOS006987@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hylafax https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188542 ------- Additional Comments From faxguy at howardsilvan.com 2006-05-08 09:28 EST ------- Can you please post the Core 5 build errors? I have built this on a Core 5 system myself before posting here, so I'm not sure what the error could be. What is the best way to attract the attention of a sponsor? Is waiting all that I can do? Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 8 13:34:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 09:34:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187317] Review Request: mindi In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605081334.k48DYXj4008262@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mindi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187317 ------- Additional Comments From bruno.cornec at hp.com 2006-05-08 09:34 EST ------- 1/ Epoch is currently the SVN revision Personaly I don't see why Epoch should be limited in any way. But I can study how to change the way it works currently to add a new release revision tag incremented of 1 each time the same version is released. 2/ Yes error on my side 3/ and 4/ I can't do without it !! These binaries have to be statically linked and under that path. What is the real issue here ? I can also ask the new developpers of rpmlint to amend that. 5/ - 8/ Again I need it. the rootfs directory is used to create a boot environment with mindi, so it needs all thes files and links in order to work correclty. Except if you have a better suggestion of localisation ? Concerning the duplicate messages, it's due to the fact that I use %defattr(644,root,root,755) in the spec file. It modifies the modes of the files, as set by the install.sh script. So I have to later on put them again with the right mode: %attr(755,root,root) %{_libdir}/mindi/aux-tools/sbin/* %attr(755,root,root) %{_libdir}/mindi/rootfs/bin/* %attr(755,root,root) %{_libdir}/mindi/rootfs/sbin/* Any suggestion of another way to do it ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 8 13:38:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 09:38:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187430] Review Request: elektra In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605081338.k48Dc49G009432@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: elektra https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187430 ------- Additional Comments From mpeters at mac.com 2006-05-08 09:37 EST ------- Suggestions: in /etc/profile.d/elektraenv.sh : FILE="/tmp/elektraenv${RANDOM}${RANDOM}" should perhaps be FILE="`mktemp -t elektraenv.XXXXXX`" -=- Most (all?) core packages that provide a .sh profile.d file also provide a .csh equivalent. It might be a good idea to port the script to csh. -=- As mentioned above - the following are packaging mistakes. in %files: %doc %{_docdir}/%{name} in %files devel: %doc %{_docdir}/%{name}-devel The Makefile should not install them into /usr/share (or they should be removed after make install) and instead they should be packaged with %doc in this way: %install *stuff currently in %install, followed by* rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/doc/%{name} rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/doc/%{name}-devel rm -f scripts/Makefile* rm -rf examples/Makefile* examples/*.xml mv doc/elektra-api/html ./api-html in %files: %doc scripts in %files devel: %doc examples api-html That should result in those docs being properly packaged. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 8 13:48:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 09:48:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187317] Review Request: mindi In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605081348.k48DmS3l012752@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mindi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187317 ------- Additional Comments From dennis at ausil.us 2006-05-08 09:48 EST ------- epoch is designed to be used sparingly. for instance if you need to revert to an older version. or upstream change there versioning in a way that means the new versioning will not update the old version. what you would be best using is the release. Statically linked binaries are frowned upon. not forbidden but it is recommended that you dynamically link. the dangling symlinks mean that the files they link to don't exist in the case of files needing different permissions then you need to list them more carefully in the %files section. making sure you own all directories and files you create. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 8 13:55:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 09:55:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187430] Review Request: elektra In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605081355.k48Dt188014188@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: elektra https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187430 ------- Additional Comments From avi at unix.sh 2006-05-08 09:54 EST ------- Nobody contributed a CSH script yet for profile.d and we don't know how to write one. This is expected to appear soon. We'll use mktemp instead of ${RANDOM}. Doesn't this documentation packaging proccess makes the build system too much dependent on RPM ? We'd like to install documentation with that layout even on non-RPM platforms. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 8 14:05:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 10:05:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187318] Review Request: mondo In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605081405.k48E5a0t016237@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mondo https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187318 ------- Additional Comments From bruno.cornec at hp.com 2006-05-08 10:05 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > 1. Don't use all the macros at the top of your spec, it just makes it harder to > do any qa on. Well, as I explained already in the mindi package, I have a build system to create .spec already in place. I'll see if I can do better, but for now these macros are useful for multirpm distro support (aka mandriva + suse + rhel + sles) > 2. Drop the additional languages from the spec. Why that ? Is fedora becoming an english only distro ? there are billions of people not speaking english, and for them having the possibility to read something else that english is useful no ? To be honest those rpms exist nearly since the begining of the project, and nobody never complained on that before, so I'm really surprised. > 3. Missing ChangeLog. My fault, will redeliver and add it. Corrected in SVN. > 4. You using a non-standard Group. Corrected in SVN. > 5. Duplicate BuildRequires: slang-devel (provided by newt-devel) I don't see the point here: # rpm -q slang-devel --provides slang-devel = 2.0.5-5.2.1 # rpm -q newt-devel --provides newt-devel = 0.52.2-5.2 What do you mean by duplicate ? Thanks for your answer, Bruno. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 8 14:10:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 10:10:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187318] Review Request: mondo In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605081410.k48EAFVs017393@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mondo https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187318 ------- Additional Comments From dennis at ausil.us 2006-05-08 10:10 EST ------- by duplicate he means [dennis at rpclnx001 SPECS]$ rpm -q --whatrequires slang-devel newt-devel-0.52.2-6 so by BuildRequire newt-devel you also get slang-devel -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 8 14:11:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 10:11:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 178901] Review Request: gtksourceview-sharp In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605081411.k48EB6ZD017574@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtksourceview-sharp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=178901 ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at ameritech.net 2006-05-08 10:10 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=128745) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=128745&action=view) Mock Build Failure Log gtksourceview-sharp currently fails in Mock. I've attached the build log, and if I've got some extra free time later today, I'll look to see what's causing the problem. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 8 14:17:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 10:17:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187430] Review Request: elektra In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605081417.k48EH8fI018984@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: elektra https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187430 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2006-05-08 10:17 EST ------- (In reply to comment #22) > Nobody contributed a CSH script yet for profile.d and we don't know how to > write one. Then I strongly suggest to learn about it: yum install tcsh > Doesn't this documentation packaging proccess makes the build system too much > dependent on RPM ? Not at all. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 8 14:18:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 10:18:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190991] Review Request: libpar2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605081418.k48EIbkq019303@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libpar2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190991 ------- Additional Comments From laurent.rineau__fc_extra at normalesup.org 2006-05-08 10:18 EST ------- Update: Spec URL: http://www.di.ens.fr/~rineau/Fedora/libpar2.spec SRPM URL: http://www.di.ens.fr/~rineau/Fedora/libpar2-0.2-2.src.rpm Thank you for your comments, Ralf. (In reply to comment #2) > 1. Minor issues: > > 1.1 > # rpmlint *RPMS/libpar*.rpm > E: libpar2-debuginfo script-without-shellbang I fixed these one. I forgot to apply rpmlint to the debuginfo package. > E: libpar2-devel only-non-binary-in-usr-lib I saw this one. I thought it is related to %{_libdir}/libpar2/include/config.h See my answer to your point 3. > Most of these probably are caused by bogus permissions on source files. > > 1.2 Empty directory > /usr/lib/libpar2 > Is this package supposed to take plugins, there? It should includes a subdirectory include/, with config.h in it. See point 3. > 2. Major: > This package's configuration (configure.ac/Makefile.am) is bugged: > - configure.ac uses PKG_CHECK_MODULES(..sigc++..) but doesn't propagate the > results to Makefile.am. Instead the Makefile explicitly links against -lstdc++. > This violates g++'s working principles. Linking against -lstdc++ is a g++ > internal detail. This is an upstream bug. I am not an automake guru (not yet). I added a patch in the package. It should correct this point. I'll try to make this patch accepted by upstream, as soon as somebody confirms that this patch is correct. > 3. Severe (Blocker): > The package installs an autoheader (config.h) to a public directory > (/usr/lib/libpar2/include/config.h). This file's contents will clash with other > package's config headers and is a severe (must fix) design flaw of this package. > A package must not install an autoheader. I do not understand this point. This file config.h is in a directory owned by the package: %{_libdir}/libpar2/include/ If a package cannot install an autoheader (such as config.h), how could dependencies access to the compilation options used to build the package? I have checked that several packages, some in FE, have config.h in %{_libdir}/%{name}/include: at least sigc++-2.0, gtkmm-2.4, glib-2.0, and gtk-2.0. I thought this was the usual way to process with config.h Can you confirm that this point is a blocker for this request? As far as I understand things, it does not seem too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 8 14:25:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 10:25:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187318] Review Request: mondo In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605081425.k48EPOjO020869@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mondo https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187318 ------- Additional Comments From bruno.cornec at hp.com 2006-05-08 10:25 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) (will do shorter as my comments were thrown away due to simultabeous modifs grumph) > in addition to above you need to fill in the changelog. the source needs the > full http:// or ftp:// url generally package builds start at 1 not 454. it > is recommeneded to use disttags. Corrected in SVN. We used SVN revision up to now so the 454. What is the rule for SVN devs ? What are disttags ? (no ref in your above http link) > you have alot of duplicate requires rpm is smart enough to pick up shared > objects that are linked. Do you mean newt ? And what if I require at least a certain version of newt ? > looks like it requires mindi but it is not available it seems to be submitted > bug #187317 you should block this bug also. The answers to the rest are in the mindi bug report (don't want to mix and match bug reports). Bruno. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 8 14:27:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 10:27:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187318] Review Request: mondo In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605081427.k48ER4e6021290@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mondo https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187318 ------- Additional Comments From bruno.cornec at hp.com 2006-05-08 10:26 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > by duplicate he means > > [dennis at rpclnx001 SPECS]$ rpm -q --whatrequires slang-devel > newt-devel-0.52.2-6 > > so by BuildRequire newt-devel you also get slang-devel Ok, understood. But what about th fact we need slang > 1.4.1 ? This constraint is different from the previous one no ? Bruno. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 8 14:27:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 10:27:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190493] Review Request: python-yaml In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605081427.k48ERBLW021342@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-yaml https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190493 ------- Additional Comments From mdehaan at redhat.com 2006-05-08 10:27 EST ------- For reasons of interop, I'm suggesting we terminate this 'zilla item, and instead move forward with resolving the core issue: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189281 The preferable way I see of doing that is by fixing the bug below by packing PySyck and orphaning the obsolete syck-python. Aside from s/yaml/syck on the import, it's a drop-in replacement. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 8 14:27:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 10:27:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190992] Review Request: gpar2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605081427.k48ERfgT021516@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gpar2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190992 ------- Additional Comments From laurent.rineau__fc_extra at normalesup.org 2006-05-08 10:27 EST ------- Having read several other review requests, I already found a blocker for my request: -?I should call update-desktop-database in %post and %postun. -?I am not sure, but this package should contain desktop files describing the mime types application/x-par and application/x-par2. I'll way for a formal review to confirm this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 8 14:28:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 10:28:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190493] Review Request: python-yaml In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605081428.k48ESS6J021660@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-yaml https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190493 mdehaan at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DEFERRED Severity|normal |low Priority|normal |low -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 8 14:28:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 10:28:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187913] Review Request: mysql-query-browser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605081428.k48ESnBD021754@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mysql-query-browser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187913 ------- Additional Comments From dzrudy at gmail.com 2006-05-08 10:28 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=128746) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=128746&action=view) mysql-query-browser strace Hi I'm able to reproduce the segfault on x86_64. It only happens when I try to connect to remote mysql server. It seems that it fials to find libc.mo locale file on my system. Connecting to localhost works ok. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 8 14:38:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 10:38:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187318] Review Request: mondo In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605081438.k48EcdOB024672@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mondo https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187318 ------- Additional Comments From gauret at free.fr 2006-05-08 10:38 EST ------- > 2. Drop the additional languages from the spec. Actually, it is recommanded to have the translations in the spec file. See the bottom of http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines?highlight=translations (2nd SHOULD item) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 8 14:39:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 10:39:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191014] Review Request: ganymed In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605081439.k48EdFNw024881@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ganymed https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191014 ------- Additional Comments From robert at marcanoonline.com 2006-05-08 10:39 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > * Why have all those macro definitions, conditional and otherwise, at the top > instead of just... > %define gcj_support 1 > ? umm Ben Konrath added that part to my initial SPEC, I just thougth it was just to make easy to package it for RHEL https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-java-list/2006-April/msg00048.html > > * I've been using %{?dist} in Release tags, like > Release: 1%{?dist} > > * There's a preference to not use macros in Source0. It's something somebody > should be able to wget directly. umm then i need to update my other packages already on extras, > > * Missing '.' at the end of %description. > > * Single line %post[un] bits should look like this... > %post -p %{_bindir}/rebuild-gcj-db > %postun -p %{_bindir}/rebuild-gcj-db > (rpmlint will complain about this) > > Thanks! > The other ones are easy to do :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 8 14:43:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 10:43:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187318] Review Request: mondo In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605081443.k48EhG2U025955@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mondo https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187318 ------- Additional Comments From dennis at ausil.us 2006-05-08 10:43 EST ------- disttag explenation http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/DistTag it will have zero effect on other Distros \ we only provide one version of slang so if its not high enough build will fail. rpmbuild partial output. Requires: /bin/sh afio binutils bzip2 >= 0.9 libc.so.6()(64bit) libc.so.6 (GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3)(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4)(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4)(64bit) libnewt.so.0.52()(64bit) libnewt.so.0.52 (NEWT_0.52)(64bit) libpthread.so.0()(64bit) libpthread.so.0(GLIBC_2.2.5) (64bit) mindi >= 1.0.7 mkisofs newt >= 0.50 slang >= 1.4.1 syslinux >= 1.52 so you link to libnewt's shared objects rpm knows that and has a requires on it. you dont link toslang though so it is a superfluous Requires as it is brought in via newt. i am assuming that you are using bzip2 binutils mkisofs syslinux via scripts? as you havent linked to them. you also have alot of duplicate files listed did you read the packaging guidelines? they answer most of these issues -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 8 14:49:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 10:49:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188542] Review Request: hylafax In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605081449.k48Enwbg027988@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hylafax https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188542 ------- Additional Comments From Christian.Iseli at licr.org 2006-05-08 10:49 EST ------- (In reply to comment #13) > What is the best way to attract the attention of a sponsor? Basically, you need to convince one of the sponsors that: - you have a genuine interest in FE - you have a good grasp of FE packaging policies - you are responsive To try to demonstrate these facts, you can: - offer more packages to review - look through other people's packages and offer useful advice on their packaging. You cannot formally approve a package yet, but you can help bringing other packages in good shape for a formal approval. > Is waiting all that I can do? Idly waiting is not a good way to find a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 8 14:50:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 10:50:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187318] Review Request: mondo In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605081450.k48Eo3Pg028009@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mondo https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187318 ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at ameritech.net 2006-05-08 10:50 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > (In reply to comment #1) > > 1. Don't use all the macros at the top of your spec, it just makes it harder to > > do any qa on. > > Well, as I explained already in the mindi package, I have a build system to > create .spec already in place. I'll see if I can do better, but for now these > macros are useful for multirpm distro support (aka mandriva + suse + rhel + sles) Well, since this will be imported in Fedora Extras CVS, the other distro support should be dropped, and the unnecessary macros dropped. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 8 14:50:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 10:50:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191036] Review Request: libmp4v2 a library for handling the mp4 container format In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605081450.k48Eo3O8028019@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libmp4v2 a library for handling the mp4 container format https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191036 ville.skytta at iki.fi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |182235 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2006-05-08 10:49 EST ------- I'm afraid this is something that will need an ack from someone (legal?) who can tell if it's acceptable in FE. FWIW, to me it looks like a "no". For example, from http://mpeg4ip.sourceforge.net/faq/index.php Q: What are the licensing terms associated with this project? A: Like most modern codecs, MPEG-4 Video and Audio codecs are almost certainly subject to patent royalities. This project does not remove any responsiblity or liability from developers or users of this kit. [...] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 8 14:54:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 10:54:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188369] Review Request: ctapi-cyberjack In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605081454.k48EsmLQ029295@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ctapi-cyberjack https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188369 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-05-08 10:54 EST ------- It really got installed as /libcyberjack_ifd.so on my system because I didn't have pcsc-lite-devel. rpmbuild should have detected this but your spec file misses a: "BuildRequires: pcsc-lite-devel" Add that to your MUST Fix list. I'll see what I can do about your account. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 8 14:56:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 10:56:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191036] Review Request: libmp4v2 a library for handling the mp4 container format In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605081456.k48EuYRO029693@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libmp4v2 a library for handling the mp4 container format https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191036 ------- Additional Comments From noa at resare.com 2006-05-08 10:56 EST ------- I've sent this message to legal at fedoraproject.org now: I would like to include libmp4v2 into Fedora Extras. It is a library that provides an interface to the mp4 container format. Once included it can be used to provide mp4/aac support to for example easytag. So, my question to the fedora project is this: can fedora extras accept the contribution from a legal standpoint? On one hand the libmp4v2 package has no knowledge about the actual audio and video coding algorithms that are a part of the mpeg 4 standard. That would make it immune to the patent issues surrounding mpeg4 that I'm aware of. On the other hand the patent situation with regards to mpeg 4 is unclear at best. There is some precedent in the form of the id3lib package, that provides similiar functionality but is a little bit more narrow in it's scope. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 8 14:59:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 10:59:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188542] Review Request: hylafax In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605081459.k48ExT3f031061@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hylafax https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188542 fedora.wickert at arcor.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163776 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From fedora.wickert at arcor.de 2006-05-08 10:59 EST ------- (In reply to comment #13) > Can you please post the Core 5 build errors? Still the same as in comment #9. > What is the best way to attract the attention of a sponsor? Is waiting all that > I can do? I'm afraid yes. You could add comments to other reviews to proof your knowledge and understanding of the guidelines, to show you are worth being sponsored. But IMO no one has a doubt about that. I suggest you wait a bit. If nothing happens, feel free to ask on fedora-extras-list. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 8 14:59:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 10:59:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188369] Review Request: ctapi-cyberjack In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605081459.k48Exnkn031146@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ctapi-cyberjack https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188369 ------- Additional Comments From frank-buettner at gmx.net 2006-05-08 10:59 EST ------- This with the BuildRequires is fixed in the new one. In about 2-4 hours the next one is comming:) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 8 15:04:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 11:04:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188369] Review Request: ctapi-cyberjack In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605081504.k48F4USU000793@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ctapi-cyberjack https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188369 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-05-08 11:04 EST ------- Who suspended your account? Then I know who to contact to unsuspend it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 8 15:06:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 11:06:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 186391] Review Request: 855resolution - Change video bios resolutions on laptops with Intel graphic chipsets In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605081506.k48F6xbw001680@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: 855resolution - Change video bios resolutions on laptops with Intel graphic chipsets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=186391 ------- Additional Comments From katzj at redhat.com 2006-05-08 11:06 EST ------- It works for me in the devel tree with an i945GM. It's available at http://people.redhat.com/~katzj/xorg-x11-drv-intel-modeset-1.6.0-2.i386.rpm (src.rpm also available there). You'll then need to modify your xorg.conf to specify the intel driver instead of i810. Feedback for whether it works on other Intel chipsets would be great. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 8 15:12:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 11:12:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190991] Review Request: libpar2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605081512.k48FCH0Z002744@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libpar2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190991 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2006-05-08 11:12 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > > 3. Severe (Blocker): > > The package installs an autoheader (config.h) to a public directory > > (/usr/lib/libpar2/include/config.h). This file's contents will clash with > other > > package's config headers and is a severe (must fix) design flaw of this > package. > > A package must not install an autoheader. > > I do not understand this point. This file config.h is in a directory owned by > the package: %{_libdir}/libpar2/include/ > > If a package cannot install an autoheader (such as config.h), how could > dependencies access to the compilation options used to build the package? There is no general answer to this question, but "somehow" - This is the basic question package configuration tools want to solve. The fundamental design flaws with exporting config header are: * autoheaders generated config.h's contain a snapshot of the build system's state having been taken at the time the configure script had been run. This state is by no means connected to a system's state, the package had been installed on. * autoheaders contain defines that are reserved to autoconf and will clash with those autoconf internal defines being used by configure scripts wanting to use this library. (E.g. /usr/lib/libpar2/include/config.h's PACKAGE_NAME will do so) * autoheaders reflect a package's internal demands/requirements. These are not connected to a package "using a package"'s demands. AFAIS, libpar2 expects packages using it to provide a set of autoconf defines. This doesn't work. > I have checked that several packages, some in FE, have config.h in > %{_libdir}/%{name}/include: at least sigc++-2.0, gtkmm-2.4, glib-2.0, and > gtk-2.0. I thought this was the usual way to process with config.h If the files you are referring to are autoheaders, these packages are also bugged. libtiff is a well known case having suffered (still suffering?) from this issue. > Can you confirm that this point is a blocker for this request? Yes, it is. The sources are suffering from a design flaw which disqualify this package from FE. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 8 15:13:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 11:13:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191005] Review Request: glob2 - Realtime Strategy game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605081513.k48FDk4A003106@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glob2 - Realtime Strategy game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191005 ------- Additional Comments From brkamikaze at gmail.com 2006-05-08 11:13 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > 2. The desktop file is not handled correctly. The desktop file is supplyed by the application, and the documentation only explains how to add a custom made one. By the documentation, specifically the line "Many applications will come with their own .desktop file, but if not, just make your own, and include it", the handling seems correct. > 5. A lot of your Requires aren't necessary, since the BuildRequires sonames will cause these to be pulled in automatically. The rpmbuild complains if my Requires line is empty (everything needed to run is also needed to compile). I will leave SDL only, to stop it from complaining. I also removed the desktop-file-utils dependency since I don't use the command "desktop-file-install" on the spec. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 8 15:17:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 11:17:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190937] Review Request: perl-Module-Install In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605081517.k48FHwmQ005372@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Module-Install https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190937 ------- Additional Comments From steve at silug.org 2006-05-08 11:17 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > The source URL seems to be wrong; is upstream really on your site? CPAN says > http://search.cpan.org/CPAN/authors/id/A/AD/ADAMK/Module-Install-0.62.tar.gz, > which I'll take as upstream for the purposes fo this review. Oops, apparently I forgot to unset CPAN before running cpanspec. Sorry. > One of the tests spits out some warnings because various utilities are missing; > is it worth adding additional BR:s to get more coverage? Definitely. Did you happen to save a build log? (It would save me another mock build.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 8 15:47:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 11:47:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191005] Review Request: glob2 - Realtime Strategy game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605081547.k48Fl9Ax013482@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glob2 - Realtime Strategy game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191005 ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at ameritech.net 2006-05-08 11:46 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > (In reply to comment #1) > > 2. The desktop file is not handled correctly. > The desktop file is supplyed by the application, and the documentation only > explains how to add a custom made one. By the documentation, specifically the > line "Many applications will come with their own .desktop file, but if not, > just make your own, and include it", the handling seems correct. As is, this does not meet that FE standards. Please look at the wiki some more, and if that is not enough, also look at packages in CVS to help you find the solution to this. http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/?root=extras -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 8 15:51:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 11:51:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 173459] Review Request: initng In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605081551.k48FpSxa014539@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 ------- Additional Comments From dragoran at feuerpokemon.de 2006-05-08 11:51 EST ------- (In reply to comment #264) > Created an attachment (id=128739) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=128739&action=view) [edit] > initng 0.6.4-1 spec file > > - New upstream version > - Added lib config flag to cmake > - Removed CODING_STANDARDS and FAQ that doesn't exist anymore > > Anyone got any solution to the chicken-egg problem? Does initng-devel really > need initng? you have to remove /lib (hardcoded) again now /%{_lib} can be used again. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 8 15:54:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 11:54:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188369] Review Request: ctapi-cyberjack In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605081554.k48FsX34015136@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ctapi-cyberjack https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188369 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-05-08 11:54 EST ------- It turns out I've managed to renable you account and sponosr you with any help so you should have CVS access now. But do _not_ import this package yet it first needs to be approved, please post a version with all the Must Fix items fixed and I'll see if that one (finally) is it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 8 15:57:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 11:57:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189824] Review Request: lasi - C++ library for creating Postscript documents In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605081557.k48FvCSP015813@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lasi - C++ library for creating Postscript documents https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189824 ------- Additional Comments From orion at cora.nwra.com 2006-05-08 11:57 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > One small issue: the summary of lasi-devel should end with a period. Fixed. > Another issue which is probably a mistake by upstream: > "pkg-config --libs lasi" returns the empty string instead of -lLASi > Looking at the examples, "-lLASi" is always explicitly included in > the compile command. Patched and submitted upstream. > Also, the policy of FE is to omit static libraries, see "Static Libraries" in > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines Gah, I can't believe I did this! Thanks for catching. Fixed. http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/lasi-1.0.5-2.fc5.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 8 16:06:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 12:06:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188369] Review Request: ctapi-cyberjack In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605081606.k48G6w8D017997@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ctapi-cyberjack https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188369 ------- Additional Comments From frank-buettner at gmx.net 2006-05-08 12:06 EST ------- yes of course but I must wait until my system I ready to start the next try -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 8 16:17:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 12:17:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 180571] Review Request: puppet In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605081617.k48GH67v020962@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: puppet https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=180571 ------- Additional Comments From dlutter at redhat.com 2006-05-08 12:17 EST ------- Did you rebuild facter after the problems you had on bug 182064 ? Can you paste the output of 'rpm -ql facter' in this ticket ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 8 16:25:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 12:25:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190949] Review Request: gaim-gaym In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605081625.k48GPVqU022854@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gaim-gaym https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190949 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-05-08 12:25 EST ------- Apologies -- had pushed rel 0 rather than rel 1 of the srpm :\ Spec tweaked, explicit requires: gtk2 dropped. Spec URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/gaim-gaym.spec SRPM URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/gaim-gaym-0.96-2.fc5.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 8 16:35:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 12:35:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191005] Review Request: glob2 - Realtime Strategy game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605081635.k48GZaGW025569@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glob2 - Realtime Strategy game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191005 ------- Additional Comments From brkamikaze at gmail.com 2006-05-08 12:35 EST ------- I based myself on the yumex spec file to try a fix the desktop file problem. Spec: http://www.sendspace.com/file/d6snuu I'm having problems to upload the SRPM, I will post it here later if the spec file is ok. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 8 16:42:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 12:42:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 186811] Review Request: libnfnetlink - Netfilter netlink userspace library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605081642.k48Ggu9R027935@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libnfnetlink - Netfilter netlink userspace library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=186811 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-05-08 12:42 EST ------- (In reply to comment #11) > So to my understanding there is nothing really preventing a release in extras, > since the gpl-text can be added to the package without it being upstream as well > for now. Or is there something I could do to actually move this topic (release > in extras) forward? Jochen is asking you to include http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl.txt as an additional source file, to include this file as %doc in your spec, and also to try to get upstream to include a copy of the license text distributed with their source. Whilst there is no requirement in the package review guidelines for the license text to be packaged if upstream do not provide it, and poking upstream is only a *should* rather than a *must* in the guidelines, if you want to get this package approved sooner rather than later, I'd do as Jochen asks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 8 17:05:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 13:05:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188369] Review Request: ctapi-cyberjack In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605081705.k48H54r0000653@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ctapi-cyberjack https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188369 ------- Additional Comments From frank-buettner at gmx.net 2006-05-08 13:04 EST ------- So now I have modify %postun -p /sbin/ldconfig but this give now antoher error of rpmlind. The new one is here: http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/qsmartcard/ctapi-cyberjack-2.0.8-10FC5.src.rpm?download -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 8 17:15:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 13:15:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191005] Review Request: glob2 - Realtime Strategy game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605081715.k48HFHOL003544@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glob2 - Realtime Strategy game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191005 ------- Additional Comments From brkamikaze at gmail.com 2006-05-08 13:15 EST ------- I managed to upload the new SRPM: http://www.sendspace.com/file/u6urw9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 8 17:20:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 13:20:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191005] Review Request: glob2 - Realtime Strategy game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605081720.k48HKk8S004799@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glob2 - Realtime Strategy game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191005 bdpepple at ameritech.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |bdpepple at ameritech.net OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 8 17:26:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 13:26:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190937] Review Request: perl-Module-Install In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605081726.k48HQWbc006617@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Module-Install https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190937 ------- Additional Comments From steve at silug.org 2006-05-08 13:26 EST ------- OK, I see the warnings now: t/03_audotinstall....ok 1/6Warning: links not found in PATH Warning: wget not found in PATH Warning: ncftpget not found in PATH Warning: ncftp not found in PATH Warning: ftp not found in PATH Warning: gpg not found in PATH t/03_audotinstall....ok I wonder if it might be safer to leave those BRs out so it can't do any network tests. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 8 17:29:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 13:29:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190991] Review Request: libpar2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605081729.k48HTClT007214@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libpar2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190991 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-05-08 13:29 EST ------- Ralf, could you either indicate where in the guidelines this type of thing is forbidden or at least point to some discussion on the matter? Your final statement about the package being disqualified from Extras seems awfully arbitrary without it. I have no opinion one way or the other on this issue because I am not familiar with it, but if you're just making up policy then I don't think it's fair to the package submitter. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 8 17:29:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 13:29:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190066] Review Request: php-pear-Mail In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605081729.k48HTZtv007531@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Mail https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190066 ------- Additional Comments From Fedora at FamilleCollet.com 2006-05-08 13:29 EST ------- I've change to "PHP License" which is listed in the DEFAULT_VALID_LICENSES (/usr/share/rpmlint/TagsCheck.py), but rpmlint still complain (i've tried a lot of others solutions, i really don't understand, rpmlint seems to use another list not including PHP License)? Spec URL: http://remi.collet.free.fr/rpms/extras/php-pear-Mail.spec SRPM URL: http://remi.collet.free.fr/rpms/extras/php-pear-Mail-1.1.10-3.fc5.src.rpm Bug #183359 brings php-1.4.9 in Rawhide and solve the %install warning (really great) and the "%postun" error on some other package (php-pear-Log and php-pear-Net-SMTP). php-1.4.9 own the %{_datadir}/pear/.pkgxml So i think(hope) this package is ready for extras. As some others : #190007, #190101, #190156, #190956, #190957, #190958 I keep using -R (instead of --packagingroot) to have compatibility with php-pear-1.4.6. For packages where --packagingroot is mandatory (php-pear-PEAR-Command-Packaging, #185423) a BuildRequires: php-pear(PEAR) > 1.4.7 have to be add to the spec. (the "Sanity check" i put in the spec detect that case). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 8 17:38:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 13:38:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 186811] Review Request: libnfnetlink - Netfilter netlink userspace library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605081738.k48HcEnE011437@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libnfnetlink - Netfilter netlink userspace library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=186811 ------- Additional Comments From i at stingr.net 2006-05-08 13:38 EST ------- http://stingr.net/l/fe/libnfnetlink.spec http://stingr.net/l/fe/libnfnetlink-0.0.14-3.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 8 17:40:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 13:40:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190876] Review Request: childplay In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605081740.k48Henhc012615@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: childplay https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190876 wart at kobold.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |wart at kobold.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 8 17:47:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 13:47:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187913] Review Request: mysql-query-browser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605081747.k48HllZ4014843@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mysql-query-browser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187913 ------- Additional Comments From dennis at ausil.us 2006-05-08 13:47 EST ------- not that it is neccesarily the answer but what version of mysql is your remote server? AFAIK the mysql tools are intended to support version 4 and 5 DB's only. I have version 5 DB's here -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 8 17:51:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 13:51:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190705] Review Request: perl-Test-Base In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605081751.k48HpXJa016199@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-Base https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190705 ------- Additional Comments From steve at silug.org 2006-05-08 13:51 EST ------- I'm importing -2 with explicit dependencies on Text::Diff and Algorithm::Diff. That makes all the tests pass. Let me know if I need to make any further changes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 8 17:55:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 13:55:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191070] New: Review Request: mcstrans Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191070 Summary: Review Request: mcstrans Product: Fedora Core Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: notting at redhat.com ReportedBy: dwalsh at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://devserv.devel/~dwalsh/SELinux/mcstrans.spec SRPM URL: http://devserv.devel/~dwalsh/SELinux/mcstrans-0.1.1-1.src.rpm Description: mcstrans is a replacement for libsetrans. Basically libselinux will not use a daemon for its translations instead of a shared library. This will allow us to easily swap in and out different translation daemons. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 8 17:58:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 13:58:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190937] Review Request: perl-Module-Install In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605081758.k48HwsXP017803@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Module-Install https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190937 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-05-08 13:58 EST ------- We certainly don't want it doing network access; I saw the gpg warning and wondered if it was going to test something relating to signing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 8 18:02:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 14:02:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190705] Review Request: perl-Test-Base In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605081802.k48I24QB018754@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-Base https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190705 ------- Additional Comments From jpo at di.uminho.pt 2006-05-08 14:01 EST ------- Steven, The Algorithm::Diff requirement and build requirement can be dropped as Text::Diff requires it. The Test::Base::Filter may use the LWP::Simple module to download files. Being this a test module I think it should be nice to require it (not BR). jpo -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 8 18:05:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 14:05:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189824] Review Request: lasi - C++ library for creating Postscript documents In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605081805.k48I5IBe019696@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lasi - C++ library for creating Postscript documents https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189824 gemi at bluewin.ch changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From gemi at bluewin.ch 2006-05-08 14:05 EST ------- APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 8 18:09:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 14:09:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190949] Review Request: gaim-gaym In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605081809.k48I9LOC021175@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gaim-gaym https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190949 ------- Additional Comments From noa at resare.com 2006-05-08 14:09 EST ------- Although I'm not an officially blessed reviewer I thought that I can do a test review and learn somewhat from it. good: - rpmlint without any complaints - although the upstream tarball is named qrc the user community uses the name gaym, so I think changing the name is a good call even though it violates the first sentence of the package naming guidelines - specfile name matches %{name} - license is indeed GPL - COPYING is included in %doc - to the best of my knowledge the spec is written in american english - the specfile is quite readable - tarball referenced maches the tarball included - the package builds correctly and seems to work quite well on fc5/i386, it also builds on fc4/x86_64 but I haven't actually tested it there - no localization, no shared libraries, not relocateable, no scriptlets - no duplicates in %files - it contains a GUI but since it is embedded in gaim the .desktop MUST is not applicable - no scriptlets As far as my newbies eyes can tell this package is problem free and works as expected. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 8 18:11:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 14:11:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187430] Review Request: elektra In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605081811.k48IBskF021995@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: elektra https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187430 ------- Additional Comments From avi at unix.sh 2006-05-08 14:11 EST ------- The new version is temporarily here: http://avi.alkalay.net/software/elektra/elektra-0.6.1-30.src.rpm All warnings were cleaned. /bin/kdb and /lib/libelektra* were not moved to /usr because the nature of this software is to be usable also by early boot stage programs. All %doc-related suggestions were implemented. Many other cleanups and suggestions were implemented. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 8 18:13:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 14:13:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190845] Review Request: sblim In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605081813.k48IDxxe022849@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sblim https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190845 ------- Additional Comments From notting at redhat.com 2006-05-08 14:13 EST ------- OK, so.... this feature request is because of a RHEL 4 feature request that involves adding software a) to enable third-party monitoring software b) on a platform we don't even ship in Fedora Core (zSeries.) I don't see how this is relevant for Core at all. This should be an extras review, if new code is being added there. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 8 18:14:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 14:14:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190705] Review Request: perl-Test-Base In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605081814.k48IEYPw023032@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-Base https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190705 ------- Additional Comments From steve at silug.org 2006-05-08 14:14 EST ------- (In reply to comment #7) > The Algorithm::Diff requirement and build requirement can be dropped > as Text::Diff requires it. > > The Test::Base::Filter may use the LWP::Simple module to download files. Being > this a test module I think it should be nice to require it (not BR). Done and done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 8 18:15:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 14:15:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190937] Review Request: perl-Module-Install In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605081815.k48IFqvp023485@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Module-Install https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190937 ------- Additional Comments From jpo at di.uminho.pt 2006-05-08 14:15 EST ------- I believed the warnings are harmless and are being emitted by the CPAN module that this module loads. It must be complaining about the missing configuration. The gpg, ftp, ncftp*, wget are CPAN configuration variables. See the output of $ perl -MCPAN -e shell cpan> o conf or the contents of a CPAN configuration file eg: /usr/lib/perl5/5.8.8/CPAN/Config.pm jpo -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 8 18:18:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 14:18:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190845] Review Request: sblim In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605081818.k48II7GG024414@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sblim https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190845 jkeating at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 8 18:21:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 14:21:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189824] Review Request: lasi - C++ library for creating Postscript documents In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605081821.k48ILjGo025488@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lasi - C++ library for creating Postscript documents https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189824 orion at cora.nwra.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From orion at cora.nwra.com 2006-05-08 14:21 EST ------- Checked in. Added to owners.list Built on devel. FC-4 and FC-5 to come shortly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 8 18:25:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 14:25:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190705] Review Request: perl-Test-Base In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605081825.k48IPo3F027261@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-Base https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190705 ------- Additional Comments From jpo at di.uminho.pt 2006-05-08 14:25 EST ------- Thanks Steven. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 8 18:28:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 14:28:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187913] Review Request: mysql-query-browser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605081828.k48ISh15028527@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mysql-query-browser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187913 ------- Additional Comments From dzrudy at gmail.com 2006-05-08 14:28 EST ------- I've played a bit with the query browser and first I made the following symlink: ln -s /usr/share/locale/en_GB/LC_MESSAGES/libc.mo /usr/share/locale/en/LC_MESSAGES/libc.mo just to make sure that it can find the libc.mo file, but it didn't solve the problem (still segfault at line 20). I removed the database name in "Default Schema" field and I was able to connect sucessfully. However when I click on the database name in the Schemata panel the segfault occurs. The mysql server version is 4.0.23 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 8 18:38:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 14:38:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190066] Review Request: php-pear-Mail In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605081838.k48Icu9l000403@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Mail https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190066 ------- Additional Comments From gauret at free.fr 2006-05-08 14:38 EST ------- > I've change to "PHP License" which is listed in the DEFAULT_VALID_LICENSES > (/usr/share/rpmlint/TagsCheck.py), but rpmlint still complain This file is overriden by /usr/share/rpmlint/config which lacks the PHP License. I've opened a bug to add it, see bug 191078. This is not a blocker of course. I'm waiting for the php package update to be published to test and approve this package, since it is dependant on it. Afterwards, I'll sponsor you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 8 18:43:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 14:43:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188482] Review Request: scipy-0.4.8 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605081843.k48IhDv6002036@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scipy-0.4.8 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188482 ------- Additional Comments From ndbecker2 at verizon.net 2006-05-08 14:43 EST ------- I believe I have done all that was requested. Updated srpm is here http://nbecker.dyndns.org:8080/scipy-0.4.8-3.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 8 18:57:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 14:57:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188369] Review Request: ctapi-cyberjack In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605081857.k48IvhFw006907@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ctapi-cyberjack https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188369 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-05-08 14:57 EST ------- I cannot get that latest srpm because of sf.net mirror issues, I will try again later. In the mean time whats the rpmlint message you get now? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 8 18:57:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 14:57:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191005] Review Request: glob2 - Realtime Strategy game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605081857.k48Ivnjw006942@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glob2 - Realtime Strategy game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191005 ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at ameritech.net 2006-05-08 14:57 EST ------- Couple of items: 1. Package fails to build in Mock. Your missing a BuildRequirement. For information on Mock refer to: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/MockTricks 2. Not a blocker, but in the files section, use %{_datadir}/%{name}/, instead of individually listing the children directories. 3. The docs can be listed on one line with a space between each document. If this doesn't make sense, look at this for an example of what I'm talking about: http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/gnomebaker/gnomebaker.spec?root=extras&view=markup 4. Instead of one long line in your desktop-file-install call how about some line breaks to make it easier to read. Refer to the above spec, if you've got questions. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 8 19:02:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 15:02:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187913] Review Request: mysql-query-browser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605081902.k48J2vh3008963@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mysql-query-browser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187913 ------- Additional Comments From dzrudy at gmail.com 2006-05-08 15:02 EST ------- Additionally the Windows version of mysql-query-browser (ver: 1.1.20) seems to work ok with the remote server. I have run mysql-query-browser on my FC5 system through gdb with the following results: (gdb) run Starting program: /usr/bin/mysql-query-browser-bin [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] [New Thread 46912496382720 (LWP 32391)] Detaching after fork from child process 32394. [New Thread 1084229968 (LWP 32398)] [Thread 1084229968 (LWP 32398) exited] [New Thread 1084229968 (LWP 32399)] Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. [Switching to Thread 1084229968 (LWP 32399)] 0x0000003009e41b36 in mysql_select_db () from /usr/lib64/mysql/libmysqlclient_r.so.15 (gdb) bt #0 0x0000003009e41b36 in mysql_select_db () from /usr/lib64/mysql/libmysqlclient_r.so.15 #1 0x0000000000510f04 in myx_use_schema (mysql=0x0, schema=Variable "schema" is not available. ) at myx_library.c:743 #2 0x000000000050e3f4 in use_schema_store_old_one (mysql=0xa90530, schema_name=0xa8dc08 "maxmini", old_schema_name=0x40a000c0) at myx_catalogs.c:112 #3 0x000000000050f871 in myx_get_schema_tables (mysql=0xa90530, catalog_name=Variable "catalog_name" is not available. ) at myx_catalogs.c:156 #4 0x0000000000439928 in TableFetchRequest::execute (this=Variable "this" is not available. ) at MQQueryDispatcher.cc:122 #5 0x000000000043658a in MQQueryDispatcher::mysql_query_thread (this=0xc5a4a0) at MQQueryDispatcher.cc:376 #6 0x000000300b02d30f in Glib::Thread::create () from /usr/lib64/libglibmm-2.4.so.1 #7 0x0000003002642e04 in g_thread_create_full () from /usr/lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0 #8 0x0000003001e062ea in start_thread () from /lib64/libpthread.so.0 #9 0x0000003000dcb73d in clone () from /lib64/libc.so.6 #10 0x0000000000000000 in ?? () also I found a related bug in mysql bugzilla: http://bugs.mysql.com/bug.php?id=8524 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 8 19:09:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 15:09:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188482] Review Request: scipy-0.4.8 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605081909.k48J9hod011803@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scipy-0.4.8 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188482 ------- Additional Comments From ndbecker2 at verizon.net 2006-05-08 15:09 EST ------- Sorry make that: http://nbecker.dyndns.org:8080/scipy-0.4.8-4.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 8 19:13:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 15:13:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191088] New: Review Request:
Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191088 Summary: Review Request:
Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: dwalsh at redhat.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://devserv.devel/~dwalsh/SELinux/mlsutils.spec SRPM URL: http://devserv.devel/~dwalsh/SELinux/mlsutils-1.1-1.src.rpm Description: This package contains additional tools required for MLS Conformance. Specifically the dev_allocator which is required to replace udev. Removable Devices need to be manually allocated by users in an MLS environment. This tool allows for the auditing of these events. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 8 19:28:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 15:28:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191088] Review Request: mlsutils In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605081928.k48JSNFb017338@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mlsutils https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191088 ville.skytta at iki.fi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request:
| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 8 20:26:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 16:26:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 186887] Review Request: libnetfilter_conntrack - Netfilter conntrack userspace library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605082026.k48KQK6O000892@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libnetfilter_conntrack - Netfilter conntrack userspace library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=186887 ------- Additional Comments From i at stingr.net 2006-05-08 16:26 EST ------- http://stingr.net/l/fe/libnetfilter_conntrack.spec http://stingr.net/l/fe/libnetfilter_conntrack-0.0.30-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 8 20:26:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 16:26:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 186892] Review Request: conntrack - Tool to manipulate netfilter connection tracking table In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605082026.k48KQQF4000924@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: conntrack - Tool to manipulate netfilter connection tracking table https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=186892 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|fedora-extras- |fedora-package- |list at redhat.com |review at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From i at stingr.net 2006-05-08 16:26 EST ------- http://stingr.net/l/fe/conntrack.spec http://stingr.net/l/fe/conntrack-0.99.1-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 8 21:05:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 17:05:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190582] Review Request: perl-Module-ScanDeps - Recursively scan Perl code for dependencies In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605082105.k48L5DHb011019@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Module-ScanDeps - Recursively scan Perl code for dependencies https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190582 jpo at di.uminho.pt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From jpo at di.uminho.pt 2006-05-08 17:04 EST ------- Thanks for the review. Imported and built for FC-4, FC-5, and devel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 8 21:05:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 17:05:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190937] Review Request: perl-Module-Install In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605082105.k48L5U1o011153@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Module-Install https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190937 Bug 190937 depends on bug 190582, which changed state. Bug 190582 Summary: Review Request: perl-Module-ScanDeps - Recursively scan Perl code for dependencies https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190582 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 8 21:24:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 17:24:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191005] Review Request: glob2 - Realtime Strategy game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605082124.k48LOuS1015815@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glob2 - Realtime Strategy game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191005 ------- Additional Comments From brkamikaze at gmail.com 2006-05-08 17:24 EST ------- I can't test the package in Mock (prep stage takes more time than I have available today), but I believe I have fixed the depedency problem, or at least most of it. Spec: http://www.sendspace.com/file/f5w635 SRPM: http://www.sendspace.com/file/8eyxmn -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 8 21:35:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 17:35:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189151] Review Request: xsp In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605082135.k48LZlsR018308@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xsp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189151 ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at ameritech.net 2006-05-08 17:35 EST ------- MD5Sums: 58facfdb9d13d48f9e8ad5069500081d xsp-1.1.13.tar.gz Good: * Source URL is canonical * Upstream source tarball verified * Package name conforms to the Fedora Naming Guidelines * Buildroot has all required elements * All paths begin with macros * All necessary BuildRequires listed * Builds fine in Mock. Bad: * The Group tag should probably reflect the same group as Apache (System Environment/Daemons), since it is a web server. * You have ownership problems with some of your directories that must be fixed. * The %clean section is missing. * Produces the following rpmlint errors: W: xsp incoherent-version-in-changelog 1.1.13-1 1.1.13-2 E: xsp no-binary E: xsp only-non-binary-in-usr-lib E: xsp script-without-shellbang /usr/lib/xsp/2.0/asp-state2.exe.config W: xsp devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/pkgconfig/xsp-2.pc E: xsp standard-dir-owned-by-package /usr/share/man/man1 E: xsp script-without-shellbang /usr/lib/xsp/2.0/dbsessmgr2.exe.config E: xsp script-without-shellbang /usr/lib/xsp/1.0/asp-state.exe.config W: xsp devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/pkgconfig/xsp.pc E: xsp script-without-shellbang /usr/lib/xsp/1.0/dbsessmgr.exe.config W: xsp one-line-command-in-%post /sbin/ldconfig W: xsp one-line-command-in-%postun /sbin/ldconfig In particular, the 'standard-dir-owned-by-package' must be fixed. Also, the ChangeLog error must be corrected. The scriptlets for the shared libraries are unnecessary, since as far as I can tell this package doesn't contain any. Most of the others can be ignored, since it is a mono package. Minor: * The 'rm -rf ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}' in the %prep section is unnecessary. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 8 21:48:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 17:48:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191005] Review Request: glob2 - Realtime Strategy game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605082148.k48LmBZk021437@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glob2 - Realtime Strategy game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191005 ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at ameritech.net 2006-05-08 17:47 EST ------- Your still missing a BuildRequirement. Also, when you change the spec file, please update the Release number, and add a ChangeLog w/ the changes made. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 8 22:31:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 18:31:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190175] Review Request: p0rn-comfort - Support programs for browsing image-gallery sites In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605082231.k48MVuMI031620@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: p0rn-comfort - Support programs for browsing image-gallery sites https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190175 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |tibbs at math.uh.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 8 22:40:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 18:40:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191110] New: Review Request: perl-Devel-Cover - Code coverage metrics for Perl Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191110 Summary: Review Request: perl-Devel-Cover - Code coverage metrics for Perl Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: jpo at di.uminho.pt QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://gsd.di.uminho.pt/jpo/software/fedora/perl-Devel-Cover.spec SRPM URL: http://gsd.di.uminho.pt/jpo/software/fedora/perl-Devel-Cover-0.55-1.src.rpm Description: This module provides code coverage metrics for Perl. Targets: distros >= FC-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 8 22:43:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 18:43:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191111] New: Review Request: perl-Test-Cmd - Perl module for portable testing of commands and scripts Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191111 Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-Cmd - Perl module for portable testing of commands and scripts Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: jpo at di.uminho.pt QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://gsd.di.uminho.pt/jpo/software/fedora/perl-Test-Cmd.spec SRPM URL: http://gsd.di.uminho.pt/jpo/software/fedora/perl-Test-Cmd-1.05-1.src.rpm Description: The Test::Cmd module provides a framework for portable automated testing of executable commands and scripts (in any language, not just Perl), especially commands and scripts that interace with the file system. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 8 23:18:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 19:18:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189151] Review Request: xsp In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605082318.k48NIbrJ010537@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xsp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189151 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-05-08 19:18 EST ------- Spec URL: http://www.smmp.salford.ac.uk/packages/xsp.spec SRPM URL: http://www.smmp.salford.ac.uk/packages/xsp-1.1.13-3.src.rpm Just about all of the points raised in #5 are fixed with this release -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 8 23:21:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 19:21:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189150] Review Request: mod_mono In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605082321.k48NL3oa010966@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mod_mono https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189150 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-05-08 19:21 EST ------- Checked the makefile.am for where the software thinks the config file should be and it's picked up by what apxs returns for an environment variable (in this case, /usr/httpd/conf) I'm not sure, but shouldn't apxs return that config files should be in conf.d? If this is the case, can someone confirm it so that I can file a BZ against apsx? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 8 23:22:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 19:22:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189727] Review Request: Scribes In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605082322.k48NMjnM011328@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Scribes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189727 peter at thecodergeek.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From peter at thecodergeek.com 2006-05-08 19:22 EST ------- Packages built successfully for Fedora Extras 5 and Devel; and they should be pushed to the mirrors shortly. Thanks for your time and advice. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 8 23:24:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 19:24:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189727] Review Request: Scribes In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605082324.k48NOKTM011628@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Scribes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189727 peter at thecodergeek.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163779 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 9 01:31:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 21:31:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190175] Review Request: p0rn-comfort - Support programs for browsing image-gallery sites In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605090131.k491V2pC004042@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: p0rn-comfort - Support programs for browsing image-gallery sites https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190175 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-05-08 21:30 EST ------- I know I promised on IRC to look into this some time ago; sorry it took me so long to get to it. Some might be put off by the name, but this is really just a simple web proxy with some interesting features relating to automated fetching of linked images. I'm inclined to approve, but first I'd like to ask if you've given any thought to moving those executables which aren't intended to be run to the user (p0rn-db*, perhaps not p0rn-dbdump) to a directory under /usr/lib. Review: * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible; license text is included in the package. * source files match upstream: 08be31c527f7577765c4721d1bdf02f7 p0rn-comfort-0.0.4.tar.gz 08be31c527f7577765c4721d1bdf02f7 p0rn-comfort-0.0.4.tar.gz-srpm * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane. * no shared libraries are present. * package is not relocatable. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * %clean is present. O %check is not present; no test suite upstream. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no libtool .la droppings. * not a GUI app. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 9 02:30:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 22:30:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191130] New: Review Request: kmobiletools Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191130 Summary: Review Request: kmobiletools Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: dennis at ausil.us QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://ausil.us/packages/kmobiletools.spec SRPM URL: http://ausil.us/packages/kmobiletools-0.4.3.3-1.fc5.src.rpm Description: KMobileTools is a KDE application that allows you to control your mobile phone from your GNU/Linux workstation To use KMobileTools you need a mobile phone, that can be attached to your PC using any type of connection (serial, USB, bluetooth and irda were tested successfully), and using an AT interface (modem-like) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 9 03:01:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 23:01:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190991] Review Request: libpar2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605090301.k4931HuZ028086@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libpar2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190991 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2006-05-08 23:01 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > Ralf, could you either indicate where in the guidelines this type of thing is > forbidden or at least point to some discussion on the matter? Your final > statement about the package being disqualified from Extras seems awfully > arbitrary without it. This is not a matter of taste nor of personal preference. It's a mere technical requirement implied by autoconf's and a compiler's working principles (cf. info autoconf, search the autoconf mailing lists archive). Or to put it in short: This package is unusable. > I have no opinion one way or the other on this issue because I am not familiar > with it, but if you're just making up policy then I don't think it's fair to > the package submitter. Sorry, but I am not making up packaging policies here nor am I accusing the packager. It's simply a case of "this package's sources are broken and need to be reworked to be functional". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 9 04:14:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 00:14:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190991] Review Request: libpar2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605090414.k494EJQ5014381@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libpar2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190991 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2006-05-09 00:14 EST ------- (In reply to comment #6) > It's simply a case of "this package's sources are broken and need to be > reworked to be functional". Let me demonstrate the bug: cat par2bug.cc #include // Fake using an autoheader #if HAVE_CONFIG_H #define PACKAGE_NAME foo #endif int main() { } 1) # g++ -o par2bug -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. $(pkg-config --cflags sigc++-2.0) \ $(pkg-config --libs sigc++-2.0) -lpar2 par2bug.cc In file included from /usr/include/libpar2/libpar2.h:5, from par2bug.cc:1: /usr/include/libpar2/par2cmdline.h:66:20: error: config.h: No such file or directory => par2cmdline.h expects the package using libpar2 to provide config.h 2) # g++ -o par2bug -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. $(pkg-config --cflags sigc++-2.0) \ $(pkg-config --libs sigc++-2.0) -lpar2 -I/usr/lib/libpar2/include par2bug.cc par2bug.cc:4:1: warning: "PACKAGE_NAME" redefined In file included from /usr/include/libpar2/par2cmdline.h:66, from /usr/include/libpar2/libpar2.h:5, from par2bug.cc:1: /usr/lib/libpar2/include/config.h:98:1: warning: this is the location of the previous definition => clash on autoheader define PACKAGE_NAME -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 9 04:23:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 00:23:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189375] Re-Review Request: Maelstrom: space combat game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605090423.k494NQcv016256@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Re-Review Request: Maelstrom: space combat game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189375 ------- Additional Comments From notting at redhat.com 2006-05-09 00:23 EST ------- Sorry about the delay. The touch will lead to extra updates even if the file isn't updated on %postun (i.e., for most normal updates). Not sure how best to handle that, though. /var/games, not /var/lib/games? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 9 04:23:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 00:23:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190939] Review Request: daap-sharp In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605090423.k494NrWD016423@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: daap-sharp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190939 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |cweyl at alumni.drew.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 9 05:32:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 01:32:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189375] Re-Review Request: Maelstrom: space combat game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605090532.k495W2MY029728@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Re-Review Request: Maelstrom: space combat game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189375 ------- Additional Comments From notting at redhat.com 2006-05-09 01:31 EST ------- Changes in CVS, including changing the setuid handling. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 9 06:30:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 02:30:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189375] Re-Review Request: Maelstrom: space combat game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605090630.k496UJ7D008641@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Re-Review Request: Maelstrom: space combat game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189375 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-05-09 02:30 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > /var/games, not /var/lib/games? See: bug 187224 and bug 165425 it would be nice if you could help us sort this out maybe you can poke your RH college responsible for bug 165425 to take a look at that bug its not like its a hard bug to fix. I personally even could live with the conclusion that Fedora is going to deviate from the FHS and use /var/lib/games as long as some sorta conclusion on the /var/games vs /var/lib/games saga is reached. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 9 09:45:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 05:45:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187622] Review Request: cowbell In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605090945.k499jNPl027794@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cowbell https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187622 ------- Additional Comments From foolish at guezz.net 2006-05-09 05:45 EST ------- New release is out, this should fix the glib dependency. Updated spec: http://folk.ntnu.no/sindrb/packages/cowbell.spec SRPM: http://folk.ntnu.no/sindrb/packages/cowbell-0.2.7.1-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 9 09:57:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 05:57:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 186892] Review Request: conntrack - Tool to manipulate netfilter connection tracking table In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605090957.k499vueX031057@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: conntrack - Tool to manipulate netfilter connection tracking table https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=186892 bugs.michael at gmx.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |186811, 186887 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 9 09:58:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 05:58:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 186887] Review Request: libnetfilter_conntrack - Netfilter conntrack userspace library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605090958.k499wJIM031208@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libnetfilter_conntrack - Netfilter conntrack userspace library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=186887 bugs.michael at gmx.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |186892 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 9 09:58:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 05:58:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 186811] Review Request: libnfnetlink - Netfilter netlink userspace library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605090958.k499wVaU031270@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libnfnetlink - Netfilter netlink userspace library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=186811 bugs.michael at gmx.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |186892 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 9 10:18:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 06:18:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190070] Review Request: par2cmdline In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605091018.k49AICZQ004566@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: par2cmdline https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190070 laurent.rineau__fc_extra at normalesup.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From laurent.rineau__fc_extra at normalesup.org 2006-05-09 06:17 EST ------- par2cmdline-0.4-8.src.rpm eventually builds correctly. The diff between releases 7 and 8 is a patch that removes warnings on all platforms, and fix a compilation error on ppc (see CVS for details). I think this bug can be closed. Thank you Jason for your support. Perhaps will I ask you a few question about branches and things like that... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 9 13:26:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 09:26:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190493] Review Request: python-yaml In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605091326.k49DQuVA019820@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-yaml https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190493 ------- Additional Comments From mdehaan at redhat.com 2006-05-09 09:26 EST ------- FYI, if anyone is watching this: PyYAML officially released today, and there is now a RbYAML parser for YAML 1.1 as well http://rbyaml.ologix.com/ --- Here's the yaml-core post from the author: PyYAML: YAML parser and emitter for Python ========================================== YAML is a data serialization format designed for human readability and interaction with scripting languages. PyYAML is a YAML parser and emitter for Python. PyYAML features a complete YAML 1.1 parser, Unicode support, pickle support, capable extension API, and sensible error messages. PyYAML supports standard YAML tags and provides Python-specific tags that allow to represent an arbitrary Python object. PyYAML is applicable for a broad range of tasks from complex configuration files to object serialization and persistance. You may download PyYAML from http://pyyaml.org/wiki/PyYAML. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 9 13:47:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 09:47:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191130] Review Request: kmobiletools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605091347.k49DlOoH025589@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kmobiletools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191130 ------- Additional Comments From dennis at ausil.us 2006-05-09 09:47 EST ------- DEFINE QT Dirs to ensure build is ok Spec URL: http://ausil.us/packages/kmobiletools.spec SRPM URL: http://www.ausil.us/packages/kmobiletools-0.4.3.3-2.src.rpm also not 100% sure is I should include a udev ruleset. the couple of mobile phones i have tried use /dev/ttyACM0 which gets [dennis at rpclnx001 SPECS]$ ls -la /dev/ttyACM0 crw-rw---- 1 root uucp 166, 0 May 9 08:32 /dev/ttyACM0 so the user cant access the phone. the two things that can make it easier is 1 making the owner the logged in user or 2 make the users needing access members of the uucp group -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 9 14:00:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 10:00:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189151] Review Request: xsp In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605091400.k49E0uFN028654@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xsp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189151 bdpepple at ameritech.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |bdpepple at ameritech.net OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 9 14:03:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 10:03:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189150] Review Request: mod_mono In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605091403.k49E3cKU029630@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mod_mono https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189150 bdpepple at ameritech.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |189151 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 9 14:03:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 10:03:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189151] Review Request: xsp In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605091403.k49E3nGY029666@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xsp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189151 bdpepple at ameritech.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |189150 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 9 14:23:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 10:23:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190991] Review Request: libpar2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605091423.k49ENmTC002470@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libpar2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190991 laurent.rineau__fc_extra at normalesup.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rc040203 at freenet.de ------- Additional Comments From laurent.rineau__fc_extra at normalesup.org 2006-05-09 10:23 EST ------- Actually, here is a list of packages that include a generated config header, on my FC-5?: gd-devel glibmm24-devel gtkmm24-devel gtkmm2-devel libjpeg-devel libsigc++20-devel libsigc++-devel libtiff-devel openldap-devel postgresql-devel Some come from FC-5 and other from FE-5. ?)?generated with: rpm -qf $(grep -l Generated /usr/lib*/*/include/*.h /usr/include/*.h| grep -v qt-3) | sort -u However, I agree that autoheaders should not be installed in the system. Perhaps should we fill a bug report for these different packages. I am very willing to have libpar2 and gpar2 in FE. Can you explain what could be a solution of a library that need autobuild tools to define some object types and operations? libpar2 needs to know the endianess to define types leu16, leu32, and leu64 (see letype.h). These three types are equal to uint16_t, uint32_t and uint64_t, on little endian platforms, but are classes with cast operations on big endian platforms. What mechanism could use libpar2 to avoid installing autoheader, so that letype.h is correct? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 9 14:24:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 10:24:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191040] Review Request: fedora-package-config-apt - Configuration files for the apt package manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605091424.k49EOpJJ002735@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fedora-package-config-apt - Configuration files for the apt package manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191040 ------- Additional Comments From pmatilai at laiskiainen.org 2006-05-09 10:24 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=128787) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=128787&action=view) Fix some whitespace issues Some sort of whitespace-eating monster appears to have struck the spec, doesn't build without this + one missing mkdir added. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 9 14:38:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 10:38:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188369] Review Request: ctapi-cyberjack In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605091438.k49EcT2k007194@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ctapi-cyberjack https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188369 ------- Additional Comments From frank-buettner at gmx.net 2006-05-09 10:38 EST ------- after change from %postun /sbin/ldconfig to %postun -p /sbin/ldconfig rpmlint says: E: ctapi-cyberjack non-empty-%post /sbin/ldconfig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 9 14:54:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 10:54:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188369] Review Request: ctapi-cyberjack In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605091454.k49EswZx012876@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ctapi-cyberjack https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188369 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2006-05-09 10:54 EST ------- That's because what you intended as a comment above %postun -p /sbin/ldconfig ("#unrerister [sic]...") is not actually a comment but it will be passed to /sbin/ldconfig as the %post script contents. Some versions of ldconfig choke on that. Fix: remove the "comments", and remember that you can't use comments that way ;) By the way, you don't need to call /usr/sbin/update-reader.conf, the pcscd init script does that automatically on startup. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 9 15:11:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 11:11:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191175] New: Review Request: pyserial - Python serial port access library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191175 Summary: Review Request: pyserial - Python serial port access library Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: i at stingr.net QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://stingr.net/l/fe/pyserial.spec SRPM URL: http://stingr.net/l/fe/pyserial-2.2-1.src.rpm Description: This module capsulates the access for the serial port. It provides backends for standard Python running on Windows, Linux, BSD (possibly any POSIX compilant system) and Jython. The module named "serial" automaticaly selects the appropriate backend. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 9 15:12:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 11:12:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189705] Review Request: aiccu In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605091512.k49FC5WB018131@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aiccu https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189705 ------- Additional Comments From Matt_Domsch at dell.com 2006-05-09 11:11 EST ------- I need one more trivial fixup, to start the service at level 59 so it starts after ntpd. I'll include that in the final posting. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 9 15:32:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 11:32:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189184] Review Request: perl-Email-Valid - check validity of email addresses In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605091532.k49FWLhT024603@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Email-Valid - check validity of email addresses https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189184 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-05-09 11:32 EST ------- Any update? This package just needs two minor fixes and it's ready to go. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 9 16:03:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 12:03:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188178] Review Request: gauche-gl - OpenGL binding for Gauche In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605091603.k49G3u1C003278@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gauche-gl - OpenGL binding for Gauche https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188178 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-05-09 12:03 EST ------- This new package builds fine in mock (development, x86_64) and the open issues have been taken care of. APPROVED BTW, to link to the middle of a wiki page you have to find the cryptic anchor name, usually from following a link from a table of contents. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 9 16:12:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 12:12:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 169703] Review Request: pari - Number Theory-oriented Computer Algebra System In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605091612.k49GChvV006199@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pari - Number Theory-oriented Computer Algebra System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=169703 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tibbs at math.uh.edu ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-05-09 12:12 EST ------- Is there any hope of progress here? Someone here actually wants this package so it would be nice to get it into the distro. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 9 16:19:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 12:19:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 169703] Review Request: pari - Number Theory-oriented Computer Algebra System In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605091619.k49GJ4xk008094@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pari - Number Theory-oriented Computer Algebra System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=169703 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-05-09 12:18 EST ------- I've been meaning to do a full/proper review for awhile, haven't found the time (yet). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 9 16:23:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 12:23:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188178] Review Request: gauche-gl - OpenGL binding for Gauche In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605091623.k49GNphI009609@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gauche-gl - OpenGL binding for Gauche https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188178 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-05-09 12:23 EST ------- (In reply to comment #6) BTW, to link to the middle of a wiki page you have to find the cryptic anchor > name, usually from following a link from a table of contents. However, if you have write access to that wiki page, you could create a named anchor using the wiki [[Anchor(anchorname)]] facility - see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/HelpOnLinking Such a link would work more reliably, since the auto-generated anchor names may vary if the page is edited. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 9 16:24:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 12:24:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188369] Review Request: ctapi-cyberjack In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605091624.k49GOOfO009792@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ctapi-cyberjack https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188369 ------- Additional Comments From frank-buettner at gmx.net 2006-05-09 12:24 EST ------- Ok is fixed:) here the new try: http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/qsmartcard/ctapi-cyberjack-2.0.8-11FC5.src.rpm?download -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 9 16:27:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 12:27:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190939] Review Request: daap-sharp In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605091627.k49GR0B6010521@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: daap-sharp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190939 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-05-09 12:26 EST ------- MUSTS: - rpmlint checks return (devel/i386): [build at zeus result]$ rpmlint daap-sharp-0.3.3-1.i386.rpm E: daap-sharp no-binary E: daap-sharp only-non-binary-in-usr-lib E: daap-sharp script-without-shellbang /usr/lib/daap-sharp/daap-sharp.dll.config W: daap-sharp devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/pkgconfig/daap-sharp.pc [build at zeus result]$ rpmlint daap-sharp-0.3.3-1.src.rpm E: daap-sharp hardcoded-library-path in %{_prefix}/lib E: daap-sharp hardcoded-library-path in %{_prefix}/lib/%{name} - package meets naming guidelines - package meets packaging guidelines - license (LGPL) OK, matches source, included text in %doc - spec file legible, in am. english - source matches upstream 53feead0f3ef75cf5e34cbb4f1d37f30 daap-sharp-0.3.3.tar.gz 53feead0f3ef75cf5e34cbb4f1d37f30 daap-sharp-0.3.3.tar.gz.srpm - package compiles on devel (i386) BAD: package fails to compile in mock on FC-5/x86_64 (and not ExcludeArch'ed): RPM build errors: File not found: /var/tmp/daap-sharp-0.3.3-1-root-mockbuild/usr/lib/daap-sharp Most likely due to this in %files: %{_prefix}/lib/%{name} Why not use %{_libdir}/%{name} instead? In fact, why not use %{_libdir} everywhere %{_prefix}/lib is used in the spec? - no missing BR - no unnecessary BR - no locales - not relocatable - no duplicate files - permissions ok - %clean ok - macro use consistent - code, not content - no need for -docs - nothing in %doc affects runtime - no need for .desktop file BAD: Files used by pkgconfig (.pc files) must be in a -devel package SHOULD: - why not include AUTHORS, ChangeLog, README, etc, in %doc? - why not include the samples in %doc? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 9 16:27:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 12:27:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189151] Review Request: xsp In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605091627.k49GRkPE010829@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xsp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189151 bdpepple at ameritech.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at ameritech.net 2006-05-09 12:27 EST ------- Rest of review in comment #5. Looks pretty good, except for the following issues: 1. The URL should be 'http://www.mono-project.com/ASP.NET#XSP', and the Source URL should be 'http://www.go-mono.com/sources/xsp/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz'. 2. Use '%{_libdir}/%{name}/' instead of '%{_libdir}/xsp/1.0/*'. In general, you want to refrain from using a wildcard to pull in children directories, since this can cause directory ownership issues. 3. The License appears to be BSD, not GPL. 4. The COPYING file should be added to the documentation. Once these items are corrected, go ahead and import it into FE CVS. +1 APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 9 16:33:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 12:33:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189656] Review Request: lilypond - A typesetting system for music notation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605091633.k49GXjkf012817@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lilypond - A typesetting system for music notation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189656 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-05-09 12:33 EST ------- I have not been able to get through a build on any combination FC5 or development, x86_64 or i386, without lilypond segfaulting as above. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 9 16:38:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 12:38:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190939] Review Request: daap-sharp In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605091638.k49GcRZE014428@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: daap-sharp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190939 ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at ameritech.net 2006-05-09 12:38 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > > BAD: package fails to compile in mock on FC-5/x86_64 (and not ExcludeArch'ed): > RPM build errors: > File not found: > /var/tmp/daap-sharp-0.3.3-1-root-mockbuild/usr/lib/daap-sharp > Most likely due to this in %files: > %{_prefix}/lib/%{name} > Why not use %{_libdir}/%{name} instead? In fact, why not use %{_libdir} > everywhere %{_prefix}/lib is used in the spec? > BAD: Files used by pkgconfig (.pc files) must be in a -devel package > The reasons for using %{_prefix}/lib and not having a -devel package are explained on the wiki. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Mono -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 9 16:52:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 12:52:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190937] Review Request: perl-Module-Install In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605091652.k49GqWSq018730@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Module-Install https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190937 steve at silug.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From steve at silug.org 2006-05-09 12:52 EST ------- I'll ignore the warnings then. The package has been imported into CVS, branches have been created, and builds have been requested. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 9 16:52:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 12:52:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190705] Review Request: perl-Test-Base In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605091652.k49GqlHj018843@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-Base https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190705 Bug 190705 depends on bug 190937, which changed state. Bug 190937 Summary: Review Request: perl-Module-Install https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190937 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 9 16:56:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 12:56:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190705] Review Request: perl-Test-Base In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605091656.k49GucRP019886@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-Base https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190705 steve at silug.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From steve at silug.org 2006-05-09 12:56 EST ------- Imported into CVS, branches created, and builds pending. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 9 16:58:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 12:58:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190939] Review Request: daap-sharp In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605091658.k49GwGjY020443@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: daap-sharp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190939 ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at ameritech.net 2006-05-09 12:58 EST ------- Chris, Could you attach the build log for the mock failure on FC-5/x86_64, so I can check to see why it failed? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 9 17:17:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 13:17:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189755] Review Request: pypoker-eval - Python Interface to poker-eval In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605091717.k49HHHrx026149@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pypoker-eval - Python Interface to poker-eval https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189755 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |tibbs at math.uh.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 9 17:22:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 13:22:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190991] Review Request: libpar2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605091722.k49HMt42027850@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libpar2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190991 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2006-05-09 13:22 EST ------- (In reply to comment #8) > Actually, here is a list of packages that include a generated config header, > on my FC-5?: > Some come from FC-5 and other from FE-5. OT at this point - This is libpar2's review request. If you think the packages you listare broken, file individual PRs against them. But beware, your list seems to contain many false positives. > However, I agree that autoheaders should not be installed in the system. > Perhaps should we fill a bug report for these different packages. Exactly - But make sure to have understood the issue. The problem is NOT packages shipping generated headers, the problem is packages shipping autoheaders (headers generated by "autoheader"). > I am very willing to have libpar2 and gpar2 in FE. Can you explain what could > be a solution of a library that need autobuild tools to define some object > types and operations? Very hard to answer. AFAIS, libpar2 suffers from a fundamentally broken API. > libpar2 needs to know the endianess to define types > leu16, leu32, and leu64 (see letype.h). These three types are equal to > uint16_t, uint32_t and uint64_t, on little endian platforms, but are classes > with cast operations on big endian platforms. What mechanism could use libpar2 > to avoid installing autoheader, so that letype.h is correct? IMO, upstream should redesign the API (Keywords data abstraction/encapsulation). Somewhat less fundamentally, upstream should find a way to hard-code the defines it relies upon into an exported header, instead of letting its exported headers depend upon external programs. A very brutal, short-term workaround/hack would be to kick out par2cmdline.h and to replace it with a file using hard-coded values. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 9 17:34:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 13:34:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189184] Review Request: perl-Email-Valid - check validity of email addresses In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605091734.k49HYkdr030941@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Email-Valid - check validity of email addresses https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189184 ------- Additional Comments From chrisw at redhat.com 2006-05-09 13:34 EST ------- Very sorry, it's on my todo list. I just had to prioritize my time elsewhere. I appreciate the review, will get this one out this week. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 9 17:38:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 13:38:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190000] Review Request: partimage In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605091738.k49HcevW031829@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: partimage https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190000 jkeating at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|188267 |188268 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-05-09 13:38 EST ------- Builds and lint is clean. APPROVED Proceed with the next steps on PackageListProcess. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 9 17:50:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 13:50:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191111] Review Request: perl-Test-Cmd - Perl module for portable testing of commands and scripts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605091750.k49HoJNb002357@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-Cmd - Perl module for portable testing of commands and scripts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191111 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |cweyl at alumni.drew.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 9 17:54:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 13:54:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189755] Review Request: pypoker-eval - Python Interface to poker-eval In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605091754.k49Hs1jn003336@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pypoker-eval - Python Interface to poker-eval https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189755 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-05-09 13:53 EST ------- I'm not a Python expert, but I promised on IRC that I'd take a look, so.... The only issue I see is the unversioned .so file. If you have versioned libraries, the unversioned link needs to live in the -devel package. Review: * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible; license text is included in the package. * source files match upstream: 2ec8a95a5d0880e99ad4695ec113b799 pypoker-eval-131.0.tar.gz 2ec8a95a5d0880e99ad4695ec113b799 pypoker-eval-131.0.tar.gz-srpm * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane. X shared libraries are present. They are internal to python so there's no need to run ldconfig, but the inversioned .so file needs to be moved to the devel package. * package is not relocatable. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * .pyo files are ghosted properly. * file permissions are appropriate. * %clean is present. O %check is not present; no test suite upstream. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * pkgconfig file is in the -devel package. * no libtool .la droppings. * not a GUI app. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 9 17:54:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 13:54:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190939] Review Request: daap-sharp In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605091754.k49HsGfR003397@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: daap-sharp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190939 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-05-09 13:54 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=128801) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=128801&action=view) fedora-5-x86_64-core buildlog Buildlog from mock for x86_64 / FC-5. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 9 18:00:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 14:00:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187292] Review Request: gecko-sharp In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605091800.k49I0qKi005245@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gecko-sharp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187292 ------- Additional Comments From foolish at guezz.net 2006-05-09 14:00 EST ------- Got some response from the blam developer Mikael Hallendal today: "the only reason is the same as for Blam depending on old Gtk#, I haven't had time to change this. I'd happily accept patches for this though in case you happen to be a developer. As for the best way to do it I guess it would be to change in configure.in what it is built against and start there by fixing problems arising. I'm not sure how many issues might be involved." Updating blam to use gecko-sharp2 is far beyond my abilities as I'm no developer. If anyone else wants to take a shot at it, please do go ahead. As long as gecko-sharp is required as a dependency for blam I would like to add it to Extras, despite it being superceded by gecko-sharp2. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 9 18:03:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 14:03:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190939] Review Request: daap-sharp In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605091803.k49I32hx005876@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: daap-sharp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190939 bdpepple at ameritech.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #128801|0 |1 is obsolete| | ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at ameritech.net 2006-05-09 14:02 EST ------- (From update of attachment 128801) Wrong build log. This is for perl-Test-Cmd. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 9 18:10:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 14:10:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 174866] Review Request: polypaudio: Improved Linux sound server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605091810.k49IApKD008534@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: polypaudio: Improved Linux sound server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174866 ------- Additional Comments From drzeus-bugzilla at drzeus.cx 2006-05-09 14:10 EST ------- Spec Name or Url: http://homes.hades.drzeus.cx/~drzeus/polypaudio/polypaudio.spec SRPM Name or Url: http://homes.hades.drzeus.cx/~drzeus/polypaudio/polypaudio-0.8.1-1.src.rpm Updated to the current version (0.8.1). I've also created a whole bunch of sub-packages to minimise the dependencies. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 9 18:11:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 14:11:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190939] Review Request: daap-sharp In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605091811.k49IBBA0008712@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: daap-sharp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190939 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-05-09 14:11 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=128802) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=128802&action=view) _correct_ x86_64 / FC-5 build.log (11:11:44) jima: cweyl: "due to scheduling difficulties, monday has been extended through wednesday." -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 9 18:17:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 14:17:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188205] Review Request: pessulus-0.9 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605091817.k49IHFFP010760@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pessulus-0.9 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188205 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|fedora-extras- |fedora-package- |list at redhat.com |review at redhat.com splinux at fedoraproject.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 9 18:25:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 14:25:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191040] Review Request: fedora-package-config-apt - Configuration files for the apt package manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605091825.k49IPMk9013909@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fedora-package-config-apt - Configuration files for the apt package manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191040 ------- Additional Comments From Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net 2006-05-09 14:25 EST ------- Eeck. Fixed in Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~athimm/fedorasubmit/fedora-package-config-apt.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~athimm/fedorasubmit/fedora-package-config-apt-5.89-2.src.rpm * Tue May 9 2006 Axel Thimm - 5.89-2 - Fix whitespace (by Panu in bug #191040c1). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 9 18:26:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 14:26:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190000] Review Request: partimage In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605091826.k49IQ5on014186@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: partimage https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190000 ------- Additional Comments From notting at redhat.com 2006-05-09 14:25 EST ------- initscripts really shouldn't be noreplace (arguably, they shouldn't be %config). Perhaps we need to fix rpmlint in this regard. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 9 18:36:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 14:36:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191200] New: Review Request: lvm2-cluster Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191200 Summary: Review Request: lvm2-cluster Product: Fedora Core Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: notting at redhat.com ReportedBy: cfeist at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://cvs.devel.redhat.com/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/~checkout~/rpms/lvm2-cluster/devel/lvm2-cluster.spec?rev=1.20;content-type=text%2Fplain SRPM URL: http://porkchop.redhat.com/dist/fc4/lvm2-cluster/ Description: This is for the lvm2-cluster rpm which was accidently left out of FC5 (it was in FC4 core). We want to make sure that it gets into FC6 core, and if possible into the FC5 core updates. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 9 18:39:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 14:39:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190000] Review Request: partimage In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605091839.k49IdkVt018765@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: partimage https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190000 ------- Additional Comments From dcantrel at redhat.com 2006-05-09 14:39 EST ------- rpmlint, I trusted you... Actually I was a bit confused about that as well, but I said, "eh, whatever, I'll change it." I will remove the %config for the initscripts. Course, if Jeremy is crushing and destroying all my hopes of having this package included in core...well, it's all wasted effort. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 9 19:14:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 15:14:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191208] New: Review Request: The Ipe extensible drawing editor Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191208 Summary: Review Request: The Ipe extensible drawing editor Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: laurent.rineau__fc_extra at normalesup.org QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.di.ens.fr/~rineau/Fedora/ipe.spec SRPM URL: http://www.di.ens.fr/~rineau/Fedora/ipe-6.0-0.pre26.1.src.rpm Description: Ipe is a drawing editor for creating figures in PDF or (encapsulated) Postscript format. It supports making small figures for inclusion into LaTeX-documents as well as making multi-page PDF presentations that can be shown on-line with a PDF viewer. (This software is developed in C++.) Note: This request depends on qt4 (bug #188180). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 9 19:15:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 15:15:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188180] Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605091915.k49JFvZR031121@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188180 laurent.rineau__fc_extra at normalesup.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |191208 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 9 19:32:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 15:32:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190000] Review Request: partimage In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605091932.k49JW2d1003539@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: partimage https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190000 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-05-09 15:31 EST ------- (In reply to comment #12) > rpmlint, I trusted you... > > Actually I was a bit confused about that as well, but I said, "eh, whatever, > I'll change it." > > I will remove the %config for the initscripts. Course, if Jeremy is crushing > and destroying all my hopes of having this package included in core...well, it's > all wasted effort. FWIW, I agree with rpmlint; initscripts shouldn't be %config - any configurability can be handled using settings in /etc/sysconfig/packagename, which can be %config(noreplace) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 9 19:51:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 15:51:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191070] Review Request: mcstrans In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605091951.k49JpiXK011074@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mcstrans https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191070 jkeating at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|notting at redhat.com |jkeating at redhat.com OtherBugsDependingO|188265 |188267 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 9 19:59:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 15:59:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188369] Review Request: ctapi-cyberjack In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605091959.k49Jxqvn013456@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ctapi-cyberjack https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188369 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-05-09 15:59 EST ------- Sorry Frank, But there are still some issues. My fault completly: -I forgot to mention in my review that you should also add an -soname option to the ifd handler "ld" command in the Makefile. This is a should fix though and doesn't block approval -The %post and %postun scripts for pcsc however do need some minor changes and that I do concider a blocker: -The comments should be below the %post resp %postun not above. As it is now the comment above %post will become part of %install (and do nothing there) and the comment above %postun will become part of %post (try rpm -q --scripts) instead of %postun. -A bigger problem is that each command in a %post script should end with "|| :" Because rpm will concider a package as not installed (or not removed!) if the script fails and bash uses the exit of the last command as script exit. So change: "/sbin/service pcscd condrestart" to "/sbin/service pcscd condrestart || :" -You now have the Requires(post[un]): /usr/sbin/update-reader.conf as I adviced, but you no longer use those. I guess that your initial solution of just requiring pcsc-lite was better. Sorry about this, I though the explicit /usr/sbin/update-reader.conf Requires would be better thinking that maybe one day we will have more then one pcsc implementation, but that seems highly unlikely. So just move back to "Requires: pcsc-lite" for the -pcsc subpackage (_Sorry_). With these few easy fixes we really should be there! I also notices some nasty 64 bit related warnings, but I've checked the relevant part of the sources and they seem harmless. Looking forward to -12 and to approving it! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 9 20:07:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 16:07:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189268] Review Request: xscreensaver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605092007.k49K7HSS016170@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xscreensaver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189268 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-05-09 16:07 EST ------- For version 5, I repackaged rpms as version 4.99.2.4-0.5. Two patches about demo-Gtk.c zombie process issue are integrated into one patch. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 9 20:08:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 16:08:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191218] New: Review Request: PyScript - Postscript graphics with Python Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191218 Summary: Review Request: PyScript - Postscript graphics with Python Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: paultcochrane at gmail.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/pyscript/pyscript-0.6.fc4.spec SRPM URL: http://dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/pyscript/pyscript-0.6-1.src.rpm Description: PyScript is a Python module for producing high quality postscript graphics. Rather than use a GUI to draw a picture, the picture is programmed using Python and the PyScript objects. This is my first submission to Fedora Extras, and I'm seeking a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 9 20:12:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 16:12:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191218] Review Request: PyScript - Postscript graphics with Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605092012.k49KCTN7017775@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PyScript - Postscript graphics with Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191218 paultcochrane at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 9 20:21:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 16:21:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190939] Review Request: daap-sharp In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605092021.k49KLdbW020387@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: daap-sharp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190939 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-05-09 16:21 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=128810) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=128810&action=view) development / x86_64 build.log As requested.... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 9 20:27:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 16:27:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190939] Review Request: daap-sharp In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605092027.k49KR7RY021939@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: daap-sharp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190939 bdpepple at ameritech.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #128802|0 |1 is obsolete| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 9 20:37:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 16:37:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 183912] Review Request: jack-audio-connection-kit - The Jack Audio Connection Kit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605092037.k49Kbm7V026022@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jack-audio-connection-kit - The Jack Audio Connection Kit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183912 nando at ccrma.stanford.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |nando at ccrma.stanford.edu ------- Additional Comments From nando at ccrma.stanford.edu 2006-05-09 16:37 EST ------- > For review purposes, IMO, I'd recommend sticking with officially released > sources. After initial import/build, upgrading to a cvs version could be a > possibility. Would that be before the package is actually released to the repository? If the answer is "yes" then please ignore the following..... === ignorable stuff begins === :-) This version will not work correctly as released on x2 processors. It'd be a pretty bad introduction to Jack for users that have machines with those processors (ie: the program appears to not work). Maybe "not work" is too strong? This is what happens: Jack will start and depending on the time that has passed since the machine was booted and the amount of time the individual processors have been in power save modes[*] tons of warning messages of the type "delay of 3856.000 usecs exceeds estimated spare time of 2653.000; restart ..." will be printed by jackd (and I mean a lot of them). This will not (in my experience) translate into audible xruns, but the messages will be printed and users will immediately assume the system is broken. Another alternative: this patch applies cleanly over the last "official" version, I was using it till I switched to the clockfix branch: http://lalists.stanford.edu/lad/2006/01/att-0167/jack-clock3.patch This problem (drifting TSC's) existed in the kernel itself, it is fixed in the current fedora kernels, I think > 2.6.14 is needed. Who knows, there may be an official release coming soon with this fixed and hopefully that will happen before the package is released. [*] Jackd internally used to use the processor's TSC for timing, on X2 processors the TSC's of the two cpus can and do drift apart over time. Jack will hit false timing errors as the timing reference is initially set on one processor and later checked for elapsed time on the other. Original post when I first reported the problem (at the time I thought it was related to Ingo's -rt patch): http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_id=8085535&forum_id=3040 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 9 20:40:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 16:40:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190939] Review Request: daap-sharp In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605092040.k49KegWF027031@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: daap-sharp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190939 ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at ameritech.net 2006-05-09 16:40 EST ------- Spec URL: http://piedmont.homelinux.org/fedora/tangerine/daap-sharp.spec SRPM URL: http://piedmont.homelinux.org/fedora/tangerine/daap-sharp-0.3.3-2.src.rpm * Tue May 9 2006 Brian Pepple - 0.3.3-2 - Add patch to fix build on x86_64. This should hopefully fix the build for development. FC5 will still fail on x86_64, due to a problem with avahi-sharp, though that will be addressed with avahi-sharp-0.6.9-9. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 9 20:47:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 16:47:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190000] Review Request: partimage In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605092047.k49KlI7A029027@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: partimage https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190000 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2006-05-09 16:47 EST ------- The way rpmlint should work with issues related to init scripts is that it should be whining about: - any executable which is marked as %config* - any non-executable file in /etc which is not marked as %config* - any file which is marked as %config but not (noreplace) ...so the only whineless solution for init scripts at the moment is to not mark them as %config*, and obviously install them executable. If this is not what happens, or if you have improvement suggestions, please file a bug against rpmlint. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 9 20:52:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 16:52:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188178] Review Request: gauche-gl - OpenGL binding for Gauche In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605092052.k49KqtAQ030656@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gauche-gl - OpenGL binding for Gauche https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188178 gemi at bluewin.ch changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From gemi at bluewin.ch 2006-05-09 16:52 EST ------- Built on FC4, FC5 and FC6. Added to owners.list. Thanks for the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 9 21:05:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 17:05:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189268] Review Request: xscreensaver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605092105.k49L58cv002260@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xscreensaver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189268 rstrode at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From rstrode at redhat.com 2006-05-09 17:04 EST ------- Hi Mamoru, I think things are good enough to go in and you really shouldn't have to wait any longer. Go ahead and build it. Tell me when it's done and we can get xscreensaver dropped from core. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 9 21:18:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 17:18:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191200] Review Request: lvm2-cluster In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605092118.k49LIOqK007198@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lvm2-cluster https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191200 jkeating at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|notting at redhat.com |jkeating at redhat.com OtherBugsDependingO|188265 |188267 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 9 21:38:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 17:38:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189151] Review Request: xsp In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605092138.k49LcQqX013481@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xsp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189151 paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 9 21:38:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 17:38:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189150] Review Request: mod_mono In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605092138.k49LcbT9013573@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mod_mono https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189150 Bug 189150 depends on bug 189151, which changed state. Bug 189151 Summary: Review Request: xsp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189151 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|NEW |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 9 21:59:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 17:59:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191070] Review Request: mcstrans In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605092159.k49Lx8eS020492@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mcstrans https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191070 ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-05-09 17:58 EST ------- Bad: - buildroot should be %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) - Source url is 404: http://fedora.redhat.com/projects/mcstrans-0.1.1.tgz - Build fails on both arches, probably a missing BuildRequires: mcstransd.c:16:29: error: selinux/setrans.h: No such file or directory Should be fixed: - Mix of variables like $RPM_BUILD_ROOT and %{optflags}. One method should be consistant throughout NEEDSWORK -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 9 22:12:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 18:12:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 179040] Review Request: socat In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605092212.k49MC5xI023437@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: socat https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=179040 ------- Additional Comments From jlbartos at hotmail.com 2006-05-09 18:11 EST ------- When using rpm's configure macro results in: checking for i686-redhat-linux-gnu-gcc... no which in turn puts: checking for equivalent simple type of size_t... 0 /* unknown, taking default */ and checking for basic type of struct stat.st_dev... 0 /* unknown, taking default */ in config.h which causes the error in comment #4. Either changing the two lines in config.h or not passing i686-redhat-linux-gnu-gcc to %configure allows for compiling. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 9 22:59:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 18:59:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189268] Review Request: xscreensaver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605092259.k49MxRGA003298@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xscreensaver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189268 ------- Additional Comments From jwz at jwz.org 2006-05-09 18:59 EST ------- Please wait for my release. What is your big hurry? It won't be long. For one thing, Mamoru has been calling it "4.99", of which there is no such thing. If you release this, it's only going to cause hassle for me. Please wait. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 9 23:20:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 19:20:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 169703] Review Request: pari - Number Theory-oriented Computer Algebra System In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605092320.k49NKIOM007727@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pari - Number Theory-oriented Computer Algebra System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=169703 ------- Additional Comments From gemi at bluewin.ch 2006-05-09 19:20 EST ------- We have still to resolve the static/shared library issue, including the pic problem. It would be helpful to have someone able to test on x86_64 and ppc architecture. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 9 23:25:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 19:25:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 169703] Review Request: pari - Number Theory-oriented Computer Algebra System In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605092325.k49NPbjg009077@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pari - Number Theory-oriented Computer Algebra System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=169703 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-05-09 19:25 EST ------- I can test on x86_64, but no PPC here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 9 23:27:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 19:27:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191070] Review Request: mcstrans In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605092327.k49NRbB0009549@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mcstrans https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191070 ------- Additional Comments From dwalsh at redhat.com 2006-05-09 19:27 EST ------- Bad: - buildroot should be %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) > Changed to this. - Source url is 404: http://fedora.redhat.com/projects/mcstrans-0.1.1.tgz > Not sure where this link should point. We are upstream for this so but I am not sure where we are supposed to put these tarballs. - Build fails on both arches, probably a missing BuildRequires: mcstransd.c:16:29: error: selinux/setrans.h: No such file or directory > Fixed Should be fixed: - Mix of variables like $RPM_BUILD_ROOT and %{optflags}. One method should be consistant throughout > Fixed I updated the tarball and spec file on http://devserv.devel/~dwalsh/SELinux -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 9 23:53:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 19:53:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191239] New: Review Request: qjackctl - Qt based JACK control application Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191239 Summary: Review Request: qjackctl - Qt based JACK control application Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: nando at ccrma.stanford.edu QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://ccrma.stanford.edu/planetccrma/extras/qjackctl.spec SRPM URL: http://ccrma.stanford.edu/planetccrma/extras/qjackctl-0.2.20-2.0.src.rpm Description: Qjackctl is a simple application to control the JACK sound server daemon, specific for the Linux Audio Desktop infrastructure. It provides a simple GUI dialog for setting several JACK daemon parameters, which are properly saved between sessions, and a way to control the status of the audio server daemon. With time, this primordial interface has become richer by including a enhanced patchbay and connection control features. Spec file based on my spec file for Planet CCRMA. This package depends on jack-audio-connection-kit-devel, already submitted to Extras but not yet approved. See: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183912 This is my first package submission, sponsor needed! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 10 01:56:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 21:56:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 179040] Review Request: socat In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605100156.k4A1u6v5010486@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: socat https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=179040 ------- Additional Comments From paul at xtdnet.nl 2006-05-09 21:56 EST ------- so 1.4.3.1 compiles fine for me on x86_64 without any changes. I've updated the spec and source.rpm: Spec Name or Url: ftp://ftp.xelerance.com/socat/binaries/fedora/4/SRPMS/socat.spec SRPM Name or Url: ftp://ftp.xelerance.com/socat/binaries/fedora/4/SRPMS/socat-1.4.3.1-1.src.rpm This is on my desktop x86_64 FC4 system with gcc-4.0.2-8.fc4 and glibc-2.3.90-12 (the glibc might be one from rawhide) checking for equivalent simple type of size_t... 6 /* unsigned long */ checking for equivalent simple type of mode_t... 4 /* unsigned int */ checking for equivalent simple type of pid_t... 3 /* int */ checking for equivalent simple type of uid_t... 4 /* unsigned int */ checking for equivalent simple type of gid_t... 4 /* unsigned int */ checking for equivalent simple type of time_t... 5 /* long */ checking for equivalent simple type of socklen_t... 4 /* unsigned int */ checking for equivalent simple type of off64_t... 5 /* long */ checking for basic type of struct stat.st_dev... 6 /* unsigned long */ checking for basic type of struct stat.st_ino... 6 /* unsigned long */ checking for basic type of struct stat.st_nlink... 6 /* unsigned long */ checking for basic type of struct stat.st_size... 5 /* long */ checking for basic type of struct stat.st_blksize... 5 /* long */ checking for basic type of struct stat.st_blocks... 5 /* long */ checking for basic type of struct stat64.st_dev... 6 /* unsigned long */ checking for basic type of struct stat64.st_ino... 6 /* unsigned long */ checking for basic type of struct stat64.st_nlink... 6 /* unsigned long */ checking for basic type of struct stat64.st_size... 5 /* long */ checking for basic type of struct stat64.st_blksize... 5 /* long */ checking for basic type of struct stat64.st_blocks... 5 /* long */ checking for basic type of struct rlimit.rlim_max... 6 /* unsigned long */ If the package is approved, I can run a build on the fedora x86_64 machine to verify this reported issue further. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 10 02:58:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 22:58:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191070] Review Request: mcstrans In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605100258.k4A2wv3m027366@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mcstrans https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191070 ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-05-09 22:58 EST ------- So it builds now, but rpmlint isn't completely happy. - Obsoletes libsetrans, but doesn't provide it. It should provide it for clean upgrade - Use of Prereq, this should actually be Requires(pre): followed by a Requires(post): (sorry I didn't notice this first) That should be it. A couple more Warnings but they can be ignored: W: mcstrans no-url-tag (already talked about, will get that later) W: mcstrans service-default-enabled /etc/init.d/mcstransd (we want this enabled) W: mcstrans incoherent-init-script-name mcstransd (um, whatever) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 10 03:12:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 23:12:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189374] Re-Review Request: jed: an editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605100312.k4A3CVLI031015@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Re-Review Request: jed: an editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189374 ------- Additional Comments From notting at redhat.com 2006-05-09 23:12 EST ------- /etc/jed.rc and JED_ROOT in man page fixed in 0.99.18-2, in CVS. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 10 03:28:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 23:28:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191088] Review Request: mlsutils In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605100328.k4A3So4D002976@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mlsutils https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191088 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-05-09 23:28 EST ------- Those URLs aren't valid on the Internet; perhaps you're pointing at an internal Red Hat server. Any chance you could put these somewhere public? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 10 03:55:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 23:55:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190878] Review Request: childplay_plugins - Plugins for childsplay (educational games for young children) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605100355.k4A3tdnr010491@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: childplay_plugins - Plugins for childsplay (educational games for young children) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190878 wart at kobold.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |wart at kobold.org ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2006-05-09 23:55 EST ------- No patches? Then what's "Patch0: ..." doing there? ;) If you can give me a url for the patch, or tell me that it's not needed, then I'll continue my review of childsplay and this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 10 03:57:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 23:57:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190876] Review Request: childplay In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605100357.k4A3vh1V011004@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: childplay https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190876 wart at kobold.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2006-05-09 23:57 EST ------- I'm almost done with a full review; I'm just waiting on a buildable plugins package. The only MUSTFIX that I've found so far is a missing BR: desktop-file-utils. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 10 04:10:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 00:10:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 179040] Review Request: socat In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605100410.k4A4Aroi013351@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: socat https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=179040 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2006-05-10 00:10 EST ------- * The sources are incomplete. They ship a configure script, but don't ship its sources (configure.in/configure.ac). As this package is GPL'ed, this can be read as violation of the GPL (shipping a crippled package) * Permissions on many source files are broken. This can result into weird side-effects on *debug-info-rpms -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 10 04:48:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 00:48:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190878] Review Request: childplay_plugins - Plugins for childsplay (educational games for young children) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605100448.k4A4mZO8021246@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: childplay_plugins - Plugins for childsplay (educational games for young children) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190878 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-05-10 00:48 EST ------- Erm. My bad: http://home.zonnet.nl/jwrdegoede/childsplay_plugins-0.80.7-alphabet-sounds.patch -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 10 06:19:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 02:19:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190876] Review Request: childplay In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605100619.k4A6JFH1007030@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: childplay https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190876 ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2006-05-10 02:19 EST ------- MUST ==== * rpmlint output clean * Package and spec file named appropriately * Source matches upstream: 2353509fda8cf7d32c8a10ebd8390370 childsplay-0.81.8.tgz * GPL license ok, license file included * Spec file legible and in Am. English * Builds in mock on: devel-i386, * Locales handled correctly with %find_lang * No shared libs * Not relocatable * Owns directories that it creates * No need for -docs subpackage * RPM_BUILD_ROOT cleaned as needed * No duplicate %files * Permissions look ok * No -devel package needed * .desktop file installed correctly SHOULDFIX ========= * Remove the single-quotes from the word 'suite' in the %description. * Package includes precompiled .pyo files. These should probably be removed and %ghosted. The python guidelines[1] don't forbid them, but the python package that I've seen always remove them. [1] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Python MUSTFIX ======= * Missing BR: desktop-file-utils QUESTIONS ========= * Why change /usr/bin/env python to /usr/bin/python? The former will pick up the first python executable in the path, which should be ok. Even if you decide to change it, you should probably use %{_bindir}/python instead of hardcoding /usr/bin in the sed command. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 10 06:24:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 02:24:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191239] Review Request: qjackctl - Qt based JACK control application In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605100624.k4A6OElJ008056@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qjackctl - Qt based JACK control application https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191239 ville.skytta at iki.fi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |183912 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 10 06:24:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 02:24:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 183912] Review Request: jack-audio-connection-kit - The Jack Audio Connection Kit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605100624.k4A6Oamw008230@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jack-audio-connection-kit - The Jack Audio Connection Kit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183912 ville.skytta at iki.fi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |191239 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 10 06:25:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 02:25:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191239] Review Request: qjackctl - Qt based JACK control application In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605100625.k4A6PNBQ008366@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qjackctl - Qt based JACK control application https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191239 ville.skytta at iki.fi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 10 06:25:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 02:25:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 183912] Review Request: jack-audio-connection-kit - The Jack Audio Connection Kit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605100625.k4A6Pisd008517@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jack-audio-connection-kit - The Jack Audio Connection Kit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183912 ville.skytta at iki.fi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |191239 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 10 06:42:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 02:42:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190243] Review Request: scim-bridge (gtkimm module in C) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605100642.k4A6giw4012913@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scim-bridge (gtkimm module in C) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190243 ------- Additional Comments From utuhiro78 at yahoo.co.jp 2006-05-10 02:42 EST ------- 1. scim-bridge-0.1.7 is released. It's there. http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=108454&package_id=185651 2. Source1 doesn't have entries for QT_IM_MODULE and XMODIFIERS. $ leafpad xinput-scim-bridge // GTK_IM_MODULE=scim-bridge + QT_IM_MODULE=scim + XMODIFIERS=@im=SCIM // 3. scim-bridge doesn't lead scim and scim-qtimm. We need to add some Requires. $ leafpad scim-bridge.spec // BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) + Requires: scim scim-qtimm BuildRequires: scim-devel // I checked them on Mandriva Cooker. I can't test your package on FC5 now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 10 06:50:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 02:50:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 183912] Review Request: jack-audio-connection-kit - The Jack Audio Connection Kit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605100650.k4A6oEGg014427@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jack-audio-connection-kit - The Jack Audio Connection Kit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183912 ------- Additional Comments From seg at haxxed.com 2006-05-10 02:50 EST ------- Is there a reason this isn't in a release version already? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 10 08:04:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 04:04:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190876] Review Request: childplay In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605100804.k4A84SDX003306@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: childplay https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190876 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-05-10 04:04 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=128836) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=128836&action=view) Improved specfile (In reply to comment #3) > > SHOULDFIX > ========= > * Remove the single-quotes from the word 'suite' in the %description. > Done > * Package includes precompiled .pyo files. These should probably be removed > and %ghosted. The python guidelines[1] don't forbid them, but the python > package that I've seen always remove them. > Done > MUSTFIX > ======= > * Missing BR: desktop-file-utils > Fixed > QUESTIONS > ========= > * Why change /usr/bin/env python to /usr/bin/python? The former will > pick up the first python executable in the path, which should be ok. Because leaving it in will make the package "Requires: /usr/bin/env" (rpmbuild does this automaticly). > Even if you decide to change it, you should probably use %{_bindir}/python > instead of hardcoding /usr/bin in the sed command. > Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 10 08:05:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 04:05:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190878] Review Request: childplay_plugins - Plugins for childsplay (educational games for young children) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605100805.k4A85RZN003598@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: childplay_plugins - Plugins for childsplay (educational games for young children) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190878 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-05-10 04:05 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=128837) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=128837&action=view) improved specfile Similar improvements as done to childplay, ghost .pyo files, etc. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 10 12:39:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 08:39:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 173459] Review Request: initng In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605101239.k4ACdCJm009361@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 daner964 at student.liu.se changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #128739|0 |1 is obsolete| | ------- Additional Comments From daner964 at student.liu.se 2006-05-10 08:39 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=128844) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=128844&action=view) initng 0.6.5-1 spec file - New upstream version - Removed the hardcoded /lib path New in this release is that the selinux stuff moved to a plugin, which will hopefully be an enhancement. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 10 12:45:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 08:45:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 183912] Review Request: jack-audio-connection-kit - The Jack Audio Connection Kit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605101245.k4ACj3oY011018@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jack-audio-connection-kit - The Jack Audio Connection Kit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183912 ------- Additional Comments From andy at smile.org.ua 2006-05-10 08:44 EST ------- I've added the above patch. It was applied clearly. Updated version here: ftp://andriy.asplinux.com.ua/pub/people/andy/extras/jack-audio-connection-kit-0. 101.1-6.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 10 12:48:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 08:48:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 173459] Review Request: initng In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605101248.k4ACmjT5011966@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 ------- Additional Comments From daner964 at student.liu.se 2006-05-10 08:48 EST ------- (In reply to comment #267) > New in this release is that the selinux stuff moved to a plugin, which will > hopefully be an enhancement. Yeah, right! Discovered that I hadn't even enabled selinux (since the way to enable it changed when it became a plugin). Enabling it (by enabling BUILD_SELINUX instead of SELINUX) broke entire build process. It's noted in upstreams bz. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 10 13:01:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 09:01:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188369] Review Request: ctapi-cyberjack In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605101301.k4AD1Sd7014996@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ctapi-cyberjack https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188369 ------- Additional Comments From frank-buettner at gmx.net 2006-05-10 09:01 EST ------- So here try #12 http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/qsmartcard/ctapi-cyberjack-2.0.8-12FC5.src.rpm?download -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 10 14:01:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 10:01:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189150] Review Request: mod_mono In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605101401.k4AE1Xjd031190@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mod_mono https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189150 ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at ameritech.net 2006-05-10 10:01 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=128850) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=128850&action=view) Mock Build Failure log Here's a couple of items: 1. URL is incorrect. Should be 'http://www.mono-project.com/Mod_mono'. 2. Need full Source0. 'http://go-mono.com/sources/%{name}/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz' 3. License is Apache, not GPL 4. Fails to build in Mock (devel). I've attach the build log for you. The problem appears to be the test for apache in the configure.ac file. It's not getting the version of apache correctly and assuming it's 1.3 , instead of 2.2. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 10 14:21:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 10:21:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 176288] Review Request: kdemultimedia-extras In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605101421.k4AEL4sI004071@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdemultimedia-extras https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176288 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-05-10 10:20 EST ------- *** Bug 145965 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 10 15:09:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 11:09:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 183067] Review Request: par2 - PAR2 recovery set command line utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605101509.k4AF9vMG016996@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: par2 - PAR2 recovery set command line utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183067 laurent.rineau__fc_extra at normalesup.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rc040203 at freenet.de, | |laurent.rineau__fc_extra at nor | |malesup.org ------- Additional Comments From laurent.rineau__fc_extra at normalesup.org 2006-05-10 11:09 EST ------- It seems this bug is a dup of #190070. (Actually, it is #190070 that should have been a dup of this bug, since I posted it after yours.) Aaron, you can find the FE spec file of par2cmdline at: http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/rpms/par2cmdline/devel/?root=extras You are welcome to make comments about this spec file. I already have taken into account comment?#3 of Ralf. (Ralf, I add you to CC list. Perhaps you have super-powers mark this bug as dup.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 10 15:37:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 11:37:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191111] Review Request: perl-Test-Cmd - Perl module for portable testing of commands and scripts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605101537.k4AFb7AB024314@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-Cmd - Perl module for portable testing of commands and scripts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191111 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-05-10 11:36 EST ------- MUSTS: - rpmlint checks return nothing (good) - package meets naming guidelines - package meets packaging guidelines - license (Perl: GPL or Artistic) OK, text in %doc, matches source - spec file legible, in am. english - source matches upstream - package compiles on devel (x86) - no missing BR - no unnecessary BR - no locales - not relocatable - owns all directories that it creates - no duplicate files - permissions ok - %clean ok - macro use consistent - code, not content - no need for -docs - nothing in %doc affects runtime - no need for .desktop file Looks good by me. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 10 16:50:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 12:50:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190876] Review Request: childplay In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605101650.k4AGoNJG014621@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: childplay https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190876 ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2006-05-10 12:50 EST ------- All MUSTFIX and SHOULDFIX items addressed. Package runs ok. APPROVED Now let's check out the plugins... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 10 16:53:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 12:53:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190066] Review Request: php-pear-Mail In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605101653.k4AGrOhw015532@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Mail https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190066 ------- Additional Comments From Fedora at FamilleCollet.com 2006-05-10 12:53 EST ------- Bug #190252 has been affected to php-pear (instead of php) php-pear-1.4.9 is available in rawhide and in FC5 testing. Extract from mock/build.log ============================================================================= Installing: php-pear noarch 1:1.4.9-2 core 357 k -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 10 16:56:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 12:56:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 186327] Review Request: tcltls In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605101656.k4AGuM5F016706@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tcltls https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=186327 ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2006-05-10 12:56 EST ------- If you're having trouble finding a sponsor then there are a couple of things you can do: * Comment on other packages to show that you have a good understanding of the packaging guidelines. This is the most important thing you can do. * Post to fedora-extras-list that you need a sponsor and refer back to these two bugs. Potential sponsors will then take a look at these bugs, as well as others that you've commented on to see if you've earned your sponsorship. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 10 16:57:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 12:57:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190876] Review Request: childplay In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605101657.k4AGvGb6017000@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: childplay https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190876 wart at kobold.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 10 16:59:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 12:59:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191303] New: Review Request: crossfire - 2D multiplayer rpg game server Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191303 Summary: Review Request: crossfire - 2D multiplayer rpg game server Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: wart at kobold.org QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.kobold.org/~wart/fedora/crossfire.spec SRPM URL: http://www.kobold.org/~wart/fedora/crossfire-1.9.0-1.src.rpm Description: Crossfire is a highly graphical role-playing adventure game with characteristics reminiscent of rogue, nethack, omega, and gauntlet. It has multiplayer capability and presently runs under X11. This package contains the server for hosting crossfire games over a public or private network. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 10 17:03:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 13:03:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191304] New: Review Request: crossfire-client - Client programs for the crossfire game Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191304 Summary: Review Request: crossfire-client - Client programs for the crossfire game Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: wart at kobold.org QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.kobold.org/~wart/fedora/crossfire-client.spec SRPM URL: http://www.kobold.org/~wart/fedora/crossfire-client-1.9.0-2.src.rpm Description: Client for playing the new client/server based version of Crossfire. This package allows you to connect to crossfire servers around the world. You do not need install the crossfire server in order to use this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 10 17:04:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 13:04:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191305] New: Review Request: crossfire-client-images - Images for the crossfire client Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191305 Summary: Review Request: crossfire-client-images - Images for the crossfire client Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: wart at kobold.org QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.kobold.org/~wart/fedora/crossfire-client-images.spec SRPM URL: http://www.kobold.org/~wart/fedora/crossfire-client-images-1.9.0-1.src.rpm Description: Image files for the crossfire client. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 10 17:05:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 13:05:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191304] Review Request: crossfire-client - Client programs for the crossfire game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605101705.k4AH5meO019732@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: crossfire-client - Client programs for the crossfire game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191304 wart at kobold.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |191305 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 10 17:06:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 13:06:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191305] Review Request: crossfire-client-images - Images for the crossfire client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605101706.k4AH60Tb019755@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: crossfire-client-images - Images for the crossfire client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191305 wart at kobold.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |191304 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 10 17:57:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 13:57:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 186811] Review Request: libnfnetlink - Netfilter netlink userspace library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605101757.k4AHv80o000498@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libnfnetlink - Netfilter netlink userspace library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=186811 ------- Additional Comments From Jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2006-05-10 13:57 EST ------- I'm happy to APPOROVE your package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 10 17:59:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 13:59:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191070] Review Request: mcstrans In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605101759.k4AHxfZJ001300@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mcstrans https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191070 ------- Additional Comments From dwalsh at redhat.com 2006-05-10 13:59 EST ------- Updated again. We need this in tonight, since libselinux requires it in rawhide now... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 10 18:12:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 14:12:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190876] Review Request: childplay In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605101812.k4AICAxE004451@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: childplay https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190876 ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2006-05-10 14:11 EST ------- I just discovered that ownership of /usr/share/assetml is causing minor problems during the uninstall process. If you install a sound package, such as gcompris-sound-en, then try to uninstall childsplay, the unisntall fails with: $ sudo rpm -e childsplay childsplay_plugins error: Failed dependencies: /usr/share/assetml is needed by (installed) gcompris-sound-en-7.4-9.fc6.i386 This is because /usr/share/assetml is owned by childsplay, but not by gcompris-sounds. Either: 1) make the gcompris sound package own /usr/share/assetml 2) remove the ownership of /usr/share/assetml from childsplay 3) Remove all ownership of /usr/share/assetml from everything except libassetml and make all assetml sound packages (including childsplay) require libassetml. 4) Ignore the errors since it affects rpm but not yum. #3 could be modified so that there is a libassetml-fs package that provides /usr/share/assetml, which is required by gcompris-sound-*, childsplay, etc. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 10 18:45:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 14:45:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189268] Review Request: xscreensaver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605101845.k4AIjFsW017157@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xscreensaver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189268 ------- Additional Comments From rstrode at redhat.com 2006-05-10 14:44 EST ------- Hi Jamie, Momoru, Just to be clear, I was referring to xscreensaver 4.24 in comment 23, not xscreensaver 4.99. The 4.99 rpms are just in preparation for the 5.0 release, yes? They aren't ever going to be built into extras, right? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 10 18:48:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 14:48:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190493] Review Request: python-yaml In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605101848.k4AImcur019121@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-yaml https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190493 toshio at tiki-lounge.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |toshio at tiki-lounge.com ------- Additional Comments From toshio at tiki-lounge.com 2006-05-10 14:48 EST ------- Seems like we have interop issues vs upstream involvement. If whytheluckystiff isn't interested in making timely releases that address the deficiencies for non-ruby bindings that makes pysyck a lot less attractive. As you note, yaml 1.1 implementations are popping up (the ruby version is even based on pyyaml...) Are we doing python programmers a favor by implementing a yaml-1.0 parser as the only option so they have to make an incompatible update to yaml-1.1 later? There's a place for both yaml 1.0 and 1.1 libraries right now but if I'm developing a new python app with yaml support, I think pyyaml's involved upstream and Unicode support make it a better candidate. Up to you if you want to be in charge of the pyyaml package or want to work on pysyck (and from there we'll figure out if Oliver is still interested in syck or if it needs to be orphaned and somes else take over.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 10 18:50:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 14:50:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189268] Review Request: xscreensaver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605101850.k4AIoxmE020094@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xscreensaver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189268 ------- Additional Comments From jwz at jwz.org 2006-05-10 14:50 EST ------- Ah. Sorry, I misunderstood. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 10 18:54:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 14:54:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190493] Review Request: python-yaml In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605101854.k4AIs9qG021433@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-yaml https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190493 ------- Additional Comments From mdehaan at redhat.com 2006-05-10 14:54 EST ------- I'm currently experiencing some issues with the Fedora Accounts system that no one is answering, and there has been no interest in sponsorship, so for now, I'm going to let this die. However these RPM's are packaged if anyone wants to steer them through. They were only minimally tweaked from Upstream to change the name. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 10 19:54:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 15:54:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190362] Review Request: unifdef In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605101954.k4AJsup6010591@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: unifdef https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190362 jpo at di.uminho.pt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |NEW Keywords| |Reopened Resolution|NEXTRELEASE | ------- Additional Comments From jpo at di.uminho.pt 2006-05-10 15:54 EST ------- Re-opening this ticket until: * package is built for FC-4 and FC-5 (cvs branches already in place) * the rawhide version-release is bigger or equal to the extras VR * files removed from the devel branch * the missing changelog entry is added ;) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 10 20:12:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 16:12:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188176] Review Request: gauche-gtk - Gauche extension module to use GTK In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605102012.k4AKChtI016336@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gauche-gtk - Gauche extension module to use GTK https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188176 ------- Additional Comments From gemi at bluewin.ch 2006-05-10 16:12 EST ------- (In reply to comment #20) > Surely not for an example. If you want to be complete, you can add a note in > that directory indicating that the -gl package needs to be installed in order > for them to work. The module gl from gauche-gl is in fact imported from the module glgd which is part of gauche-gtk, so I would say that gauche-gl is required for gauche-gtk to provide the full functionality. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 10 20:28:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 16:28:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187266] Review Request: gprolog - GNU Prolog is a free Prolog compiler In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605102028.k4AKShcN021592@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gprolog - GNU Prolog is a free Prolog compiler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187266 ------- Additional Comments From gemi at bluewin.ch 2006-05-10 16:28 EST ------- Output of rpmlint gprolog: W: gprolog devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/gprolog-1.2.19/lib/libengine_fd.a W: gprolog devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/gprolog-1.2.19/lib/libbips_pl.a W: gprolog devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/gprolog-1.2.19/lib/libbips_fd.a W: gprolog devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/gprolog-1.2.19/include/gprolog.h W: gprolog devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/gprolog-1.2.19/lib/libengine_pl.a W: gprolog devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/gprolog-1.2.19/lib/liblinedit.a W: gprolog devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/gprolog-1.2.19/include/fd_to_c.h Would it make sense to split off the prolog to c compiler into an extra package. This would contains these object files and the compiler programs gplc, ma2asm, etc... rpmlint of gprolog src rpm: E: gprolog configure-without-libdir-spec Will adding --libdir=%{_libdir} to the configure command line break the build? Note, that on x86_64, %{_libdir} will be /usr/lib64. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 10 21:35:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 17:35:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190243] Review Request: scim-bridge (gtkimm module in C) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605102135.k4ALZHMw009902@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scim-bridge (gtkimm module in C) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190243 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |wtogami at redhat.com OtherBugsDependingO| |171491 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 10 22:10:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 18:10:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190243] Review Request: scim-bridge (gtkimm module in C) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605102210.k4AMAG8h019681@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scim-bridge (gtkimm module in C) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190243 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2006-05-10 18:10 EST ------- Utumi-san, thanks for your comments. (In reply to comment #1) > 1. scim-bridge-0.1.7 is released. > It's there. > http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=108454&package_id=185651 Thanks for the reminder. > 2. Source1 doesn't have entries for QT_IM_MODULE and XMODIFIERS. > $ leafpad xinput-scim-bridge > // > GTK_IM_MODULE=scim-bridge > + QT_IM_MODULE=scim > + XMODIFIERS=@im=SCIM > // This is intentional since those are taken care of by the scim xinput file. > 3. scim-bridge doesn't lead scim and scim-qtimm. > We need to add some Requires. > $ leafpad scim-bridge.spec > // > BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) > + Requires: scim scim-qtimm > BuildRequires: scim-devel > // Ok, I'm adding requires scim, but I don't think scim-bridge should require scim-qtimm. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 10 23:43:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 19:43:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 175237] Review Request: bzr - bazaar-ng distributed revision control system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605102343.k4ANhIMS007821@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bzr - bazaar-ng distributed revision control system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175237 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From mlh at zip.com.au 2006-05-10 19:43 EST ------- bzr 0.8 is out and much improved. it also likely to be very stable and used for a long time as it is the version most likely to be included with ubuntu's 'long term support' linux release. Is 0.8 expected to make it into extras soon? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 10 23:55:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 19:55:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 166427] Review Request: inform - Compiler for Z-machine story files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605102355.k4ANt74g009883@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: inform - Compiler for Z-machine story files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=166427 chris at chrisgrau.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG OtherBugsDependingO|163776, 182235 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From chris at chrisgrau.com 2006-05-10 19:54 EST ------- I contacted Graham Nelson regarding this issue. He has his reasons for not wanting to use an OSI-approved license. In his words, > I am nervous of the GPL, and its cognates. Not because I dislike > the principle of thing, or do not share the generally egalitarian > outlook - but because I want to keep the definition of the language > stable. I therefore don't want to give people the right to create > derivative works. All the other rights are fine - open source, > compile it yourself, distribute it yourself, no fees or patents, > use it even commercially without permission, sure. I just don't > want Inform to be like awk, with no copy of awk compatible > with any other on points of detail. I can understand where he's coming from on this and I'm not convinced I want to change his mind. I'm going to go ahead and let the issue drop. I appreciate the attention from both Jason and Hans. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 11 00:31:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 20:31:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190878] Review Request: childplay_plugins - Plugins for childsplay (educational games for young children) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605110031.k4B0V01X017053@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: childplay_plugins - Plugins for childsplay (educational games for young children) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190878 wart at kobold.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2006-05-10 20:30 EST ------- Since rawhide is borked right now I haven't been able to test mock builds, which is also how I verify the BR: on packages. I'll get to that as soon as rawhide is working again. MUST ==== * rpmlint output clean * GPL license ok * Spec file legible and in Am. English * Upstream source used during review d3ea05d2a1fb373d9c4836845b199a76 childsplay_plugins-0.80.7.tgz * $RPM_BUILD_ROOT cleaned correctly * No -devel package needed * No shared libs * No locales * No need for -docs subpackage * No .desktop file needed MUSTFIX ======= * Source0: url points to the Sourceforge mirror selection page. Better to use dl.sourceforge.net or hardcode a mirror so that tools like spectool can be used to download the source files. (the same is true for childsplay, which I failed to notice earlier) * 'yum remove childsplay childsplay_plugins' left two dangling directories on the filesystem: - /usr/share/childsplay/plugins - /usr/share/childsplay/Data/icons This is because yum removed childsplay before childsplay_plugins, and since the directories weren't empty when childsplay was removed, and they weren't owned by childsplay_plugins, they got left behind. SHOULD ====== * Even though upstream uses an underscore in the name, I think it's better to use a dash '-' here. * Request that upstream include the GPL license file in the tarball as they already do for the base childsplay package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 11 01:00:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 21:00:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190997] Review Request: linux-wlan-ng In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605110100.k4B10433023509@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: linux-wlan-ng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190997 ------- Additional Comments From redhat at flyn.org 2006-05-10 21:00 EST ------- Spec URL: http://www.flyn.org/SRPMS/linux-wlan-ng.spec SRPM URL: http://www.flyn.org/SRPMS/linux-wlan-ng-kmod-0.2.3-2..src.rpm Spec URL: http://www.flyn.org/SRPMS/linux-wlan-ng-tools.spec SRPM URL: http://www.flyn.org/SRPMS/linux-wlan-ng-tools-0.2.3-2.src.rpm These packages start to use the system mentioned in Comment #1. However, I am not clear on some of the documentation. The kmod .spec file contains, at a minimum, the following issues: 1. Several macros are hardcoded because I have not yet figured out kmodtool. 2. The install process is convoluted because linux-wlan-ng's install process is not very flexible. Both of these issues are labeled with FIXME in the .spec file. I plan to continue work on these issues. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 11 01:41:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 21:41:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191350] New: Review Request: perl-Spreadsheet-ParseExcel Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191350 Summary: Review Request: perl-Spreadsheet-ParseExcel Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: mpeters at mac.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec file: http://mpeters.us/fc_extras/perl-Spreadsheet-ParseExcel.spec Src RPM: http://mpeters.us/fc_extras/perl-Spreadsheet-ParseExcel-0.2603-0.1.src.rpm Description: This module allows you to get information from Excel file. This module can handle files of Excel95, 97 and 2000. (and now supports Excel4) The module will work on the majority of Windows, UNIX and Macintosh platforms. DO NOT APPROVE YET BLOCKERS(2): 1) License is listed as Unknown at CPAN and I can not find it in the source. For that reason, I have set release at 0.1 and am attempting to contact upstream author to get a new release with a license included. 2) Full functionallity for Japanese requires manual installation of a file marked as %doc and requires modification of a file owned by another package. NOTES: The module is capable of some additional functionallity if a Unicode::Map file is installed, and the Unicode::Map REGISTRY file is modified. The location where perl-Unicode-Map puts its .map files looks to be arch dependent. This is a noarch package, and I would rather not install the .map file into an arch dependent location forcing the package to be arch dependent. Also - I would rather not modify a file of another package. Assuming the license issue is resolved, I will file an RFE with perl-Unicode-Map (and cc the Fedora perl list in the RFE) to see if the maintainer of that package is willing to modify that package so that things will "just work". -=- I would like to submit this package because there is a LaTeX macro on CTAN that can make use of it, that would be useful for importing data from excel format spreadsheets. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 11 02:35:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 22:35:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191070] Review Request: mcstrans In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605110235.k4B2ZLq7012886@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mcstrans https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191070 jkeating at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|188267 |188268 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-05-10 22:35 EST ------- Builds now, just the ignorable warnings. Approving. (and since you're asleep probably, building it for rawhide.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 11 02:38:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 22:38:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190101] Review Request: php-pear-Log In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605110238.k4B2c1tl013822@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Log https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190101 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tibbs at math.uh.edu ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-05-10 22:37 EST ------- I'd like to see some movement on these php-pear package reviews, but we have a distinct lack of packaging guidelines for PHP modules. Here are a few issues I noticed: "PEAR" in the summary isn't really descriptive; maybe something like "Abstracted logging facility for PHP" would make more sense. I guess RPM won't extract the php-pear(*) provides as it will for Perl, which is too bad. I wonder if it could be taught. Use "BuildArch:" instead of "BuildArchitectures:"; it lines up better. rpmlint disagrees with the overlong line in the description. Could you explain the comment in %prep? Perhaps rpmlint could be taught to do the sanity check so it doesn't have to live in the spec. Could you explain the comment in %postun? I think you might need Requires(post): php-pear and Requires(postun): php-pear (or is that php-pear(PEAR)?). Unfortunately I can't do a proper test because the updated php-pear isn't in FC5 yet and rawhide is broken at the moment. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 11 03:34:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 23:34:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191350] Review Request: perl-Spreadsheet-ParseExcel In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605110334.k4B3YTdj029104@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Spreadsheet-ParseExcel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191350 ------- Additional Comments From mpeters at mac.com 2006-05-10 23:34 EST ------- Response from upstream: --- Thank you for your mail. And I've selected "Standard-Perl denotes that the user may choose between GPL and Artistic," at my PAUSE (Perl Authors Upload Server) page. --- I do not have a PAUSE account, but is this good enough to set license to GPL or Artistic? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 11 05:28:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 01:28:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191356] New: Review Request: python-clientform - Client-side HTML form handling Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191356 Summary: Review Request: python-clientform - Client-side HTML form handling Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: lmacken at redhat.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/lmacken/python-clientform.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/lmacken/python-clientform-0.2.2-1.src.rpm Description: ClientForm is a Python module for handling HTML forms on the client side, useful for parsing HTML forms, filling them in and returning the completed forms to the server. It developed from a port of Gisle Aas' Perl module HTML::Form, from the libwww-perl library, but the interface is not the same. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 11 05:32:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 01:32:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191356] Review Request: python-clientform - Client-side HTML form handling In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605110532.k4B5Wmcg024378@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-clientform - Client-side HTML form handling https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191356 lmacken at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG ------- Additional Comments From lmacken at redhat.com 2006-05-11 01:32 EST ------- Already in Extras.. sorry for the noise ;) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 11 05:35:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 01:35:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191358] New: Review Request: python-mechanize - Stateful programmatic web browsing Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191358 Summary: Review Request: python-mechanize - Stateful programmatic web browsing Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: lmacken at redhat.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/lmacken/python-mechanize.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/lmacken/python-mechanize-0.1.1a-1.src.rpm Description: Stateful programmatic web browsing, after Andy Lester's Perl module WWW::Mechanize. The library is layered: mechanize.Browser (stateful web browser), mechanize.UserAgent (configurable URL opener), plus urllib2 handlers. Features include: ftp:, http: and file: URL schemes, browser history, high-level hyperlink and HTML form support, HTTP cookies, HTTP-EQUIV and Refresh, Referer [sic] header, robots.txt, redirections, proxies, and Basic and Digest HTTP authentication. mechanize's response objects are (lazily-) .seek()able and still work after .close(). Much of the code originally derived from Perl code by Gisle Aas (libwww-perl), Johnny Lee (MSIE Cookie support) and last but not least Andy Lester (WWW::Mechanize). urllib2 was written by Jeremy Hylton. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 11 05:54:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 01:54:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190878] Review Request: childplay_plugins - Plugins for childsplay (educational games for young children) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605110554.k4B5sGx8029451@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: childplay_plugins - Plugins for childsplay (educational games for young children) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190878 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-05-11 01:54 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > Since rawhide is borked right now I haven't been able to test mock builds, which > is also how I verify the BR: on packages. I'll get to that as soon as rawhide > is working again. You know you can use mock with an FC5 root rather than rawhide to do this, right? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 11 05:56:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 01:56:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191356] Review Request: python-clientform - Client-side HTML form handling In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605110556.k4B5uuS9030059@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-clientform - Client-side HTML form handling https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191356 ville.skytta at iki.fi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 11 06:37:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 02:37:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189783] Review Request: e17: The enlightenment DR17 window manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605110637.k4B6bVCj005805@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: e17: The enlightenment DR17 window manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189783 ------- Additional Comments From michael at knox.net.nz 2006-05-11 02:37 EST ------- Any progress on this package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 11 07:02:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 03:02:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 166427] Review Request: inform - Compiler for Z-machine story files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605110702.k4B72bx3011747@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: inform - Compiler for Z-machine story files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=166427 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-05-11 03:02 EST ------- Hmm, Couldn't he make up a License (using an OSI one as starting point) which is fully OSI except that it doesn't allow changing the Inform language? Which then brings us to the next question, would such a License be open enough for Fedora? Otherwise you can always package it for the repo that must not be named. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 11 07:07:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 03:07:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191208] Review Request: The Ipe extensible drawing editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605110707.k4B77qt8012966@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: The Ipe extensible drawing editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191208 ------- Additional Comments From laurent.rineau__fc_extra at normalesup.org 2006-05-11 03:07 EST ------- Update, fix the Release tag: Spec URL: http://www.di.ens.fr/~rineau/Fedora/ipe.spec SRPM URL: http://www.di.ens.fr/~rineau/Fedora/ipe-6.0-0.1.pre26.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 11 07:08:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 03:08:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189268] Review Request: xscreensaver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605110708.k4B783Xh013025@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xscreensaver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189268 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-05-11 03:07 EST ------- Hello, Ray and Jamie; I intended to use xscreensaver-4.24-2 until the formal xscreensaver version 5 is released. The rpm versioned 4.99-XXXXXX by me is for the preparation and discussion to release version 5. However, I decided that I have to fix several bugs on 4.24-2 before moving xscreensaver to extras. I added the minimum fixes I thought to 4.24-2, removed rpmlint complaint and repackaged to 4.24-3 (4.24-4 and above is erased....) , put on the same URL. I think this rpm (4.24-3) can be released in extras soon. Then.... What should I do? Ray, I have read http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/Contributors, however, am I formally sponcered by you? If so, I will create fedora account and go ahead. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 11 07:09:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 03:09:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189268] Review Request: xscreensaver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605110709.k4B79Mgw013312@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xscreensaver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189268 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #128002|0 |1 is obsolete| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 11 07:10:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 03:10:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189783] Review Request: e17: The enlightenment DR17 window manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605110710.k4B7A7ae013493@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: e17: The enlightenment DR17 window manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189783 ------- Additional Comments From che666 at gmail.com 2006-05-11 03:10 EST ------- actually i am also looking for ignacio (i heard hes pretty involved atm) to get review/input/patches for the menu gen. do you know python micheal? If so i could attach the prototype here.. actually it was you requesting proper menus :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 11 07:10:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 03:10:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189268] Review Request: xscreensaver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605110710.k4B7AIqm013546@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xscreensaver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189268 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #128002|0 |1 is patch| | Attachment #128002|1 |0 is obsolete| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 11 07:10:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 03:10:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189268] Review Request: xscreensaver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605110710.k4B7Al1j013657@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xscreensaver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189268 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #128002|1 |0 is patch| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 11 07:11:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 03:11:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189268] Review Request: xscreensaver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605110711.k4B7Br2Y013873@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xscreensaver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189268 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #128062|0 |1 is obsolete| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 11 12:30:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 08:30:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188369] Review Request: ctapi-cyberjack In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605111230.k4BCUmCG015111@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ctapi-cyberjack https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188369 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778, 177841 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-05-11 08:30 EST ------- Should fix: -The ctapi-cyberjack_MakefilePCSC.patch sets soname to libcyberjack_ifd.so.0 this should be libcyberjack_ifd.so This is not a blocker because the .so file gets opened with a full path, and thus not through ld.so.cache. You do really need to fix this though. -The comments for: "/sbin/service pcscd condrestart||:" may be above "/sbin/service pcscd condrestart||:" as long as they are below the "%postXXX" You've fixed all blockers, so your package is approved! p.s. This was first discussed by mail because of bugzilla outage, I've received -13 by mail which fixed both Shoulds (excellent!). Al ready to import -13 and request a build! Don't forget to add this package to owners.list . -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 11 12:36:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 08:36:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 166470] Review Request: taskjuggler In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605111236.k4BCa0Ki016602@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: taskjuggler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=166470 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2006-05-11 08:35 EST ------- Thank you for the comments. (In reply to comment #5) > E: taskjuggler binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/TaskJugglerUI > ['/usr/lib64', '/usr/lib64/qt-3.3/lib'] > > Try configure --disable-rpath Added. > W: taskjuggler devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/libtaskjuggler.so > > It's a symlink, no big deal Removed. > E: taskjuggler library-without-ldconfig-postin /usr/lib64/libtaskjuggler.so.3.0.3 > E: taskjuggler library-without-ldconfig-postun /usr/lib64/libtaskjuggler.so.3.0.3 Fixed. > * Missing SMP flags. If it doesn't build with it, please add a comment > (wiki: PackagingGuidelines#parallelmake) Added for now. > * No downloadable source. Please give the full URL in the Source tag. Fixed. > .desktop file needs some work, use desktop-file-install > * Desktop file: vendor should be fedora > (wiki: PackagingGuidelines#desktop) > * Scriptlets: missing update-desktop-database > (wiki: ScriptletSnippets) > * Desktop file: the Categories tag should contain X-Fedora > (wiki: PackagingGuidelines#desktop) > * Desktop file: the Categories tag should contain Application > (wiki: PackagingGuidelines#desktop) > * Scriptlets: missing "gtk-update-icon-cache" in %post (wiki: ScriptletSnippets) > * Scriptlets: missing "gtk-update-icon-cache" in %postun (wiki: ScriptletSnippets) Added. > The /usr/share/doc/HTML conflicts with Fedora's stuff, this and probably the > contents of packages/taskjuggler should be flagged with %doc instead. The location seems standard for KDE packages. I don't know if changing this would need require matching changes in source code too. > Any way to remove the .la file? Removed. Here is the updated submission: http://people.redhat.com/petersen/extras/taskjuggler.spec http://people.redhat.com/petersen/extras/taskjuggler-2.2.0-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 11 12:52:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 08:52:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188369] Review Request: ctapi-cyberjack In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605111252.k4BCq6Jw021000@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ctapi-cyberjack https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188369 ------- Additional Comments From frank-buettner at gmx.net 2006-05-11 08:51 EST ------- So but I have an litle problem to acces the CVS system because the filename of my public SSH key is not called id_rsa.pub it has onother name. So what paramter must I add to "cvs co common" to say the ssh use fedora_rsa.pub and not id_rsa.pub?? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 11 13:00:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 09:00:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188369] Review Request: ctapi-cyberjack In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605111300.k4BD0nwb023578@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ctapi-cyberjack https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188369 ------- Additional Comments From jima at auroralinux.org 2006-05-11 09:00 EST ------- (In reply to comment #72) Strictly speaking, you should be using the fedora_rsa file, not fedora_rsa.pub (which would be server-side). But, to actually answer the question, put this in your ~/.ssh/config (which needs to be chmod'd 600): Host cvs.fedora.redhat.com IdentityFile ~/.ssh/fedora_rsa You don't need to add anything to the cvs command (assuming you have CVSROOT set to :ext:your_user at cvs.fedora.redhat.com:/cvs/extras, anyway). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 11 13:09:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 09:09:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190876] Review Request: childplay In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605111309.k4BD9IO9025663@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: childplay https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190876 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-05-11 09:09 EST ------- (In reply to comment #6) > I just discovered that ownership of /usr/share/assetml is causing minor problems > during the uninstall process. If you install a sound package, such as > gcompris-sound-en, then try to uninstall childsplay, the unisntall fails with: > $ sudo rpm -e childsplay childsplay_plugins error: Failed dependencies: > /usr/share/assetml is needed by (installed) gcompris-sound-en-7.4-9.fc6.i386 > > This is because /usr/share/assetml is owned by childsplay, but not by > gcompris-sounds. Either: > 1) make the gcompris sound package own /usr/share/assetml > 2) remove the ownership of /usr/share/assetml from childsplay > 3) Remove all ownership of /usr/share/assetml from everything except libassetml > and make all assetml sound packages (including childsplay) require libassetml. > 4) Ignore the errors since it affects rpm but not yum. > > #3 could be modified so that there is a libassetml-fs package that provides > /usr/share/assetml, which is required by gcompris-sound-*, childsplay, etc. This is intented behaviour, since you no longer have any need for gcompris-sound-en you should uninstall it as well. My idea behind this is as follows: -one or more applications can use assetml format data, they Provide /usr/share/assetml (In the case of childsplay directyl, because it has a build in (python) assetml parser, in the case of gcompris through libassetml whihc gcompris Requires). -assetml data packages Require: /usr/share/assetml -if all users of assetml data get uninstalled, then the assetml data packages must be uninstalled too, since they Require: /usr/share/assetml which then no longer is provided. -This having to remove assetml data packages when tehre are no more assetml data users is imho a feature not a bug :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 11 13:13:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 09:13:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189197] Review Request: gtk2hs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605111313.k4BDDfxw026853@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtk2hs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189197 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2006-05-11 09:13 EST ------- I think you're right. But let's keep -mozembed separate since mozilla-devel is a very big dep. http://people.redhat.com/petersen/extras/gtk2hs.spec http://people.redhat.com/petersen/extras/gtk2hs-0.9.10-1.src.rpm (building now...) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 11 13:19:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 09:19:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 186811] Review Request: libnfnetlink - Netfilter netlink userspace library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605111319.k4BDJQSH028479@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libnfnetlink - Netfilter netlink userspace library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=186811 i at stingr.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 11 13:19:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 09:19:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 186892] Review Request: conntrack - Tool to manipulate netfilter connection tracking table In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605111319.k4BDJd1J028564@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: conntrack - Tool to manipulate netfilter connection tracking table https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=186892 Bug 186892 depends on bug 186811, which changed state. Bug 186811 Summary: Review Request: libnfnetlink - Netfilter netlink userspace library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=186811 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 11 13:20:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 09:20:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 186887] Review Request: libnetfilter_conntrack - Netfilter conntrack userspace library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605111320.k4BDKD8k028822@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libnetfilter_conntrack - Netfilter conntrack userspace library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=186887 Bug 186887 depends on bug 186811, which changed state. Bug 186811 Summary: Review Request: libnfnetlink - Netfilter netlink userspace library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=186811 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 11 13:20:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 09:20:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188369] Review Request: ctapi-cyberjack In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605111320.k4BDKbDM028970@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ctapi-cyberjack https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188369 ------- Additional Comments From frank-buettner at gmx.net 2006-05-11 09:20 EST ------- Thank's now it works. Must the file called ctapi-cyberjack-2.0.8-13.src.rpm or ctapi-cyberjack.src.rpm? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 11 13:21:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 09:21:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188369] Review Request: ctapi-cyberjack In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605111321.k4BDLL9Y029197@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ctapi-cyberjack https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188369 ------- Additional Comments From frank-buettner at gmx.net 2006-05-11 09:21 EST ------- Thank's now it works. Must the file called ctapi-cyberjack-2.0.8-13FC5.src.rpm or ctapi-cyberjack-FC5.src.rpm simple ctapi-cyberjack.src.rpm ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 11 13:54:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 09:54:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191088] Review Request: mlsutils In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605111354.k4BDsupa006151@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mlsutils https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191088 ------- Additional Comments From dwalsh at redhat.com 2006-05-11 09:54 EST ------- Sorry about that moved them to: Spec URL: ftp://people.redhat.com/~dwalsh/SELinux/mlsutils.spec SRPM URL: ftp://people.redhat.com/~dwalsh/SELinux/mlsutils-1.1-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 11 13:57:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 09:57:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188138] Review Request: mod_auth_ntlm_winbind - NTLM authentication for the Apache web server using winbind daemon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605111357.k4BDvER7006806@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mod_auth_ntlm_winbind - NTLM authentication for the Apache web server using winbind daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188138 ------- Additional Comments From dmitry at butskoy.name 2006-05-11 09:57 EST ------- Upgrade to the latest SVN (compatibility with Apache 2.2) New SPEC: http://dmitry.butskoy.name/mod_auth_ntlm_winbind/mod_auth_ntlm_winbind.spec New SRPM: http://dmitry.butskoy.name/mod_auth_ntlm_winbind/mod_auth_ntlm_winbind-20060510-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 11 13:58:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 09:58:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 186892] Review Request: conntrack - Tool to manipulate netfilter connection tracking table In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605111358.k4BDw3rU007174@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: conntrack - Tool to manipulate netfilter connection tracking table https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=186892 ------- Additional Comments From bugzilla.redhat at neufeind.net 2006-05-11 09:57 EST ------- Since 186811 has been approved now, any objections to this package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 11 13:58:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 09:58:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 186887] Review Request: libnetfilter_conntrack - Netfilter conntrack userspace library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605111358.k4BDw6Kn007199@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libnetfilter_conntrack - Netfilter conntrack userspace library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=186887 ------- Additional Comments From bugzilla.redhat at neufeind.net 2006-05-11 09:57 EST ------- Since 186811 has been approved now, any objections to this package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 11 13:58:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 09:58:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188180] Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605111358.k4BDweeS007493@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188180 ------- Additional Comments From laurent.rineau__fc_extra at normalesup.org 2006-05-11 09:58 EST ------- I am not yet in group 'fedorabugs', but I can start a review. It is my first review, so I hope it is what is expected. Here is my review: ** MUST item, fix rpmlint warnings and errors: W: qt4 strange-permission qt4.sh 0755 W: qt4 strange-permission qt4.csh 0755 Could be ignored: 0755 is the permission used for all other files in /etc/profile.d W: qt4 hardcoded-prefix-tag %{qtdir} Do not use Prefix tag unless you motivate this choice. IMHO, qt4 cannot be relocated easily. You should remove this tag. E: qt4 configure-without-libdir-spec You can ignore this one: Qt configure is not GNU/configure W: qt4 non-conffile-in-etc /etc/ld.so.conf.d/qt4-x86_64.conf Whereas the qt package in FC do not mark /etc/ld.conf.d/qt-*.conf as config file, I think that files in /etc/ld.conf.d/ should be tagged as %config(noreplace). If a user wants to modify those files, we should assume that he knows what he does. W: qt4 one-line-command-in-%post /sbin/ldconfig W: qt4 one-line-command-in-%postun /sbin/ldconfig May be ignored. No easy to fix. Maybe you could use: %if "%{?ld_so_conf_d}" != "1" %post echo "%{qtdir}/lib" >> /etc/ld.so.conf /sbin/ldconfig %postun if [ $1 -eq 0 ]; then grep -v "^%{qtdir}/lib" /etc/ld.so.conf > /etc/ld.so.conf.new 2>/dev/null mv -f /etc/ld.so.conf.new /etc/ld.so.conf fi /sbin/ldconfig %else %post -p /sbin/ldconfig %postun -p /sbin/ldconfig %endif but I am not sure that it is a better choice. E: qt4-designer devel-dependency qt4-devel You can ignore this one. W: qt4-devel summary-ended-with-dot Development files and documentation for the Qt GUI toolkit. Easy to fix. E: qt4-devel invalid-directory-reference /usr/lib64/pkgconfig/QtNetwork.pc E: qt4-devel invalid-directory-reference /usr/lib64/pkgconfig/QtSvg.pc E: qt4-devel invalid-directory-reference /usr/lib64/pkgconfig/QtTest.pc E: qt4-devel invalid-directory-reference /usr/lib64/pkgconfig/Qt3Support.pc E: qt4-devel invalid-directory-reference /usr/lib64/pkgconfig/QtSql.pc E: qt4-devel invalid-directory-reference /usr/lib64/pkgconfig/QtGui.pc E: qt4-devel invalid-directory-reference /usr/lib64/pkgconfig/QtXml.pc E: qt4-devel invalid-directory-reference /usr/lib64/pkgconfig/QtCore.pc E: qt4-devel invalid-directory-reference /usr/lib64/pkgconfig/QtOpenGL.pc It seems that qmake adds -L%{_buildir}/qt-x11-opensource-src-4.1.2/lib in pkg-config files. It should should be sed off. E: qt4-devel arch-dependent-file-in-usr-share /usr/share/doc/qt4-devel-4.1.2/affine/affine (repeted 123 times) Please remove compiled demos and examples from the package. W: qt4-devel conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/profile.d/qt4.csh W: qt4-devel conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/profile.d/qt4.sh Please use %config(noreplace) instead of %config alone. See par 'Configuration Files' in http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines E: qt4-devel executable-marked-as-config-file /etc/profile.d/qt4.csh E: qt4-devel script-without-shellbang /etc/profile.d/qt4.csh E: qt4-devel executable-marked-as-config-file /etc/profile.d/qt4.sh E: qt4-devel script-without-shellbang /etc/profile.d/qt4.sh Could be ignored, IMHO. E: qt4-devel script-without-shellbang /usr/lib64/qt4/mkspecs/macx-xcode/Info.plist.app E: qt4-devel script-without-shellbang /usr/lib64/qt4/mkspecs/macx-pbuilder/Info.plist.app E: qt4-devel script-without-shellbang /usr/lib64/qt4/mkspecs/macx-xcode/qmake.conf E: qt4-devel script-without-shellbang /usr/lib64/qt4/mkspecs/macx-pbuilder/qmake.conf Nobody cares, IMHO. W: qt4-devel wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/qt4-devel-4.1.2/tools/codecs/encodedfiles/iso-8859-15.txt W: qt4-devel wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/qt4-devel-4.1.2/tools/codecs/encodedfiles/iso-8859-1.txt Please ignore that warning: it seems to be intended. W: qt4-devel doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/qt4-devel-4.1.2/painting/svgviewer/svgviewer libQtSvg.so.4()(64bit) (repeted several times, for different compiled examples/demos) Same as above. W: qt4-MySQL summary-ended-with-dot MySQL drivers for Qt's SQL classes. W: qt4-ODBC summary-ended-with-dot ODBC drivers for Qt's SQL classes. W: qt4-PostgreSQL summary-ended-with-dot PostgreSQL drivers for Qt's SQL classes. W: qt4-SQLite summary-ended-with-dot SQLite drivers for Qt's SQL classes. Should be fixed. W: qt4-MySQL no-documentation W: qt4-config no-documentation W: qt4-designer no-documentation W: qt4-ODBC no-documentation W: qt4-PostgreSQL no-documentation W: qt4-SQLite no-documentation I do not see what documentation could be included, here. (End of rpmlint stuff.) ** OK: naming follows the Package Naming Guidelines. Actually, the section "Multiple packages with the same base name" of http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines does not cover the case of a package named "qt4" that is more recent than the package named "qt", but it seems the right choice. ** MUST: the package seems to conform to the Packaging Guidelines, except for the items pointed out by rpmlint above, and the following item: - I found two static libraries but they seem to be exception required by the upstream build system: tools/assistant/lib/lib.pro and tools/designer/src/uitools/uitools.pro both contain "CONFIG += staticlib". It seems ok. - The desktop file refers to the mime type x-designer. Actually, the file %{_datadir}/mimelnk/application/x-designer.desktop is owned by kdelibs. Maybe this is acceptable, but I must admit that I do not know. FC qt package suffers from the same issue. - The desktop file must be installed by desktop-file-install. See http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#desktop - Should not %{qtdir}/etc be owned by the package qt4? Actually, I do not understand the redhat_artwork stuff. Can you explain? - The /etc/ld.so.conf.d stuff is not really clear. /etc/ld.so.conf.d is requires by FC qt on FC-4 and FC-5. And I doubt that qt4 could be accepted for previous versions of FC. Perhaps you should simplify your spec file by assuming that /etc/ld.so.conf.d/ is required. - Your spec file use both %{buildroot} and $RPM_BUILD_ROOT. According to http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#UsingBuildRootOptFlags you should avoid to mixe the two forms. - What is the %{name} == "qt" test for? - Why these two lines? # remove broken links rm -f %{buildroot}%{qtdir}/mkspecs/default/linux-g++* ** OK: license is GPL/QPL, matches the upstream license, and the text of the license(s) is in %doc. ** OK: the tarball md5sum matches the one in ftp://ftp.trolltech.com/qt/source/md5sums.txt ** OK: the sources builds at least on x86_64, under FC-5. ** MUST: BuildRequires: - BuildRequires: perl|sed|tar are optional, according to http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Exceptions - missing build requirements: libXcursor-devel and libXi-devel ** MUST: remove duplicate files in %files: if %{_lib}=="lib", I think that %{qtdir}/lib is declared twice in the %files section: %dir %{qtdir}/lib/ %{qtdir}/%{_lib} ** MUST: doc subpackage I think that the documentation should go in a -devel-docs subpackage. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 11 14:16:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 10:16:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190991] Review Request: libpar2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605111416.k4BEGTxq012465@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libpar2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190991 laurent.rineau__fc_extra at normalesup.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DEFERRED ------- Additional Comments From laurent.rineau__fc_extra at normalesup.org 2006-05-11 10:16 EST ------- I eventually decided to cancel this review request for a while. libpar2 is not ready to be part of Fedora Extras. I am in touch with upstream developers, who agreed that libpar2 is a dirty adaptation of par2cmdline, in order to build gpar2. I will work with them and reopen this request libpar2 and gpar2 latter. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 11 14:17:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 10:17:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188369] Review Request: ctapi-cyberjack In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605111417.k4BEHDoe012668@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ctapi-cyberjack https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188369 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-05-11 10:17 EST ------- AFAIK the SRPM filename doesn't matter I just use the filename as generated by rpmbuild -bs -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 11 14:17:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 10:17:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190992] Review Request: gpar2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605111417.k4BEHCBh012656@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gpar2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190992 Bug 190992 depends on bug 190991, which changed state. Bug 190991 Summary: Review Request: libpar2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190991 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |DEFERRED Status|NEW |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 11 14:18:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 10:18:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190992] Review Request: gpar2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605111418.k4BEID39013023@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gpar2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190992 laurent.rineau__fc_extra at normalesup.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DEFERRED ------- Additional Comments From laurent.rineau__fc_extra at normalesup.org 2006-05-11 10:18 EST ------- Close this bug. libpar2 (bug #190991) is not ready for inclusing into FE. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 11 14:20:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 10:20:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191350] Review Request: perl-Spreadsheet-ParseExcel In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605111420.k4BEKNjV013616@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Spreadsheet-ParseExcel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191350 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-05-11 10:20 EST ------- Yes, this is sufficient. However, until the actual sources indicate the license, I would make sure that the actual message from the author is available either in the package or attached to this bugzilla ticket so that there's no room for confusion. Are you still requesting that reviews be held off? I think it might be reasonable to disable thie additional functionality that requires the perl-Unicode-Map modifications until those are in. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 11 14:21:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 10:21:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190878] Review Request: childplay_plugins - Plugins for childsplay (educational games for young children) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605111421.k4BELrQB014141@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: childplay_plugins - Plugins for childsplay (educational games for young children) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190878 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #128837|0 |1 is obsolete| | ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-05-11 09:40 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=128885) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=128885&action=view) improved specfile (In reply to comment #4) > MUSTFIX > ======= > > * Source0: url points to the Sourceforge mirror selection page. Better > to use dl.sourceforge.net or hardcode a mirror so that tools like > spectool can be used to download the source files. (the same is true for > childsplay, which I failed to notice earlier) > Fixed > * 'yum remove childsplay childsplay_plugins' left two dangling directories > on the filesystem: > - /usr/share/childsplay/plugins > - /usr/share/childsplay/Data/icons > This is because yum removed childsplay before childsplay_plugins, and since > the directories weren't empty when childsplay was removed, and they weren't > owned by childsplay_plugins, they got left behind. > I've added: Requires(postun): /usr/share/childsplay/plugins Requires(postun): /usr/share/childsplay/Data/icons Which should enforce proper uninstall order. > SHOULD > ====== > * Even though upstream uses an underscore in the name, I think it's better > to use a dash '-' here. > Won't fix, this means that %{name} can't be used in the Source URL, and that I need to pass -n to %setup, etc. Now if upstreams name was really ugly I would find that worth the trouble but for this I would rather be consistent with what upstream uses. > * Request that upstream include the GPL license file in the tarball as they > already do for the base childsplay package. > Will do. ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-05-11 10:21 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=128892) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=128892&action=view) improved specfile (In reply to comment #4) > MUSTFIX > ======= > > * Source0: url points to the Sourceforge mirror selection page. Better > to use dl.sourceforge.net or hardcode a mirror so that tools like > spectool can be used to download the source files. (the same is true for > childsplay, which I failed to notice earlier) > Fixed > * 'yum remove childsplay childsplay_plugins' left two dangling directories > on the filesystem: > - /usr/share/childsplay/plugins > - /usr/share/childsplay/Data/icons > This is because yum removed childsplay before childsplay_plugins, and since > the directories weren't empty when childsplay was removed, and they weren't > owned by childsplay_plugins, they got left behind. > I've added: Requires(postun): /usr/share/childsplay/plugins Requires(postun): /usr/share/childsplay/Data/icons Which should enforce proper uninstall order. Unfortunatly this doesn't seem to work any bright ideas? > SHOULD > ====== > * Even though upstream uses an underscore in the name, I think it's better > to use a dash '-' here. > Won't fix, this means that %{name} can't be used in the Source URL, and that I need to pass -n to %setup, etc. Now if upstreams name was really ugly I would find that worth the trouble but for this I would rather be consistent with what upstream uses. > * Request that upstream include the GPL license file in the tarball as they > already do for the base childsplay package. > Will do. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 11 14:24:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 10:24:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 165314] Review Request: kismet -- A WLAN detector, sniffer and IDS In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605111424.k4BEO7D8014711@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kismet -- A WLAN detector, sniffer and IDS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=165314 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-05-11 10:23 EST ------- (In reply to comment #20) > > *These: > > Requires(pre): %crontabdir > > Requires(postun): %crontabdir > > ... are required resp. the best current way to express: > > * the directory must exist before the package places files into it. Else, > when the directory is a symlink (e.g. compare /etc/init.d) in the owning > package, you will create oddities. > > * the package must be removed before the directory. Else, the directory > can not be removed because it still contains files from 'kismet' and > becomes orphaned. Therefore, a strict '%crontabdir -> kismet' order > on installation, and 'kismet -> %crontabdir' order on uninstallation > is required. A plain 'Requires:' does not *guarantees* such an order. > > I just hit a problem in a package of mine being reviewed where I have exactly this problem (package owning dir being removed before the packages which requires the dir is). So I tried fixing it, unfortunatly this doesn't seem to help, rpm bug? See: Bug #190878 . Any help much appreciated. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 11 14:37:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 10:37:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191350] Review Request: perl-Spreadsheet-ParseExcel In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605111437.k4BEb96v019556@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Spreadsheet-ParseExcel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191350 ------- Additional Comments From mpeters at mac.com 2006-05-11 10:36 EST ------- OK - I can put the actual message from the author as an attachment. I would like to hold off on actual review until the Japanese support is figured out, partly because I think it should be there, and partly because rpm autodeps will require the additional perl modules that are only needed if set up for Japanese support, so if the Japanese support isn't there then it has dependency bloat. -=- In the following attachment, I have altered the message to hide the private e-mail address the upstream author replied from. The public e-mail address (which is in the package source) is still there. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 11 14:38:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 10:38:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191350] Review Request: perl-Spreadsheet-ParseExcel In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605111438.k4BEcrKS020067@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Spreadsheet-ParseExcel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191350 ------- Additional Comments From mpeters at mac.com 2006-05-11 10:38 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=128894) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=128894&action=view) e-mail reply from upstream regarding license -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 11 14:45:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 10:45:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188445] Review Request: bootconf In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605111445.k4BEjr9j022675@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bootconf https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188445 ------- Additional Comments From mdehaan at redhat.com 2006-05-11 10:45 EST ------- I did not look at this very closely, though I should add that grubby (command line app) and booty (python library) already support multiple boot loaders. If you would like to create a GUI for booty, that sounds like a good thing, although I am not sure if grubby needs a replacement as it already works pretty darn well. It makes good sense, IMHO, to support multiple boot loaders, otherwise the app seems to collide a bit with grubconf. Per the grubconf page, grubconf seems to be being replaced by one of the Gnome system tools for boot configuration: http://www.gnome.org/projects/gst/screenshots/boot.jpg Which looks like an upgrade to what is in FC5 today. "Administration/bootloader" is fairly useless as it only lets you pick which bootloader to use. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 11 15:04:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 11:04:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191350] Review Request: perl-Spreadsheet-ParseExcel In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605111504.k4BF4ldi026586@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Spreadsheet-ParseExcel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191350 ------- Additional Comments From mpeters at mac.com 2006-05-11 11:04 EST ------- Ah geez - the license is there. It's in ParseExcel.pm You may distribute under the terms of either the GNU General Public License or the Artistic License, as specified in the Perl README file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 11 15:14:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 11:14:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191350] Review Request: perl-Spreadsheet-ParseExcel In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605111514.k4BFE0Ks028783@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Spreadsheet-ParseExcel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191350 mpeters at mac.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |191387 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 11 15:28:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 11:28:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191389] New: Review Request: oooqs2 Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191389 Summary: Review Request: oooqs2 Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: dennis at ausil.us QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.ausil.us/packages/oooqs2.spec SRPM URL: http://www.ausil.us/packages/oooqs2-1.0-1.fc5.src.rpm Description: OpenOffice.org Quickstarter 2 is a small systray applet for KDE. It is designed to preload OOo in memory for faster startup -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 11 15:29:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 11:29:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188369] Review Request: ctapi-cyberjack In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605111529.k4BFTcfU032511@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ctapi-cyberjack https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188369 ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2006-05-11 11:29 EST ------- > Thank's now it works. > Must the file called ctapi-cyberjack-2.0.8-13FC5.src.rpm or > ctapi-cyberjack-FC5.src.rpm simple ctapi-cyberjack.src.rpm ? I don't mean to offend, but I am surprised that by the end of this lengthy process you are asking basic questions like this. Please review the packaging guidelines and package naming guidelines carefully, as understanding them are very important to Fedora cvsextras membership. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 11 15:31:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 11:31:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187622] Review Request: cowbell In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605111531.k4BFVbBM000709@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cowbell https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187622 ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at ameritech.net 2006-05-11 11:31 EST ------- MD5Sums: fcf32bcf60be2ca204519192eb26bacc cowbell-0.2.7.1.tar.gz Good: * Source URL is canonical * Upstream source tarball verified * Group Tag is from the official list * Buildroot has all required elements * All paths begin with macros * All directories are owned by this or other packages * All necessary BuildRequires listed. * All desired features are enabled * Make succeeds even when %{_smp_mflags} is defined * Files have appropriate permissions and owners * Package installs and uninstalls cleanly on FC5 Bad: * Missing scriptlets for GTK+ icon cache. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/ScriptletSnippets#head-fc74f078205565f961f6d836b77c3428619c689d * Missing Requires for mono-core & gtk-sharp2 Minor: * Why package the static lib? Pass the --disable-static flag to configure, and remove '%{_libdir}/cowbell/libtaglibsharpglue.a' from your files. * Unnecessary BR on gettext. This is included in the minimum build environment in Mock. * I would drop the ChangeLog from the docs, since the NEWS file basically contains the same info. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 11 15:40:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 11:40:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190878] Review Request: childplay_plugins - Plugins for childsplay (educational games for young children) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605111540.k4BFegQ4003415@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: childplay_plugins - Plugins for childsplay (educational games for young children) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190878 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2006-05-11 11:40 EST ------- Use of Requires(foo) to try to force package installation/erase order (as opposed to their real purpose, dependencies of the corresponding %foo _scriptlet_) is abuse. The real problem is bug 89500 which is reportedly fixed in rpm CVS; hopefully a fixed version will trickle down to FC soon. If you want the left-behind dirs problem worked around in the meantime, owning those dirs in all affected packages is one solution. Ignoring it is another; there are loads of packages in FC/FE that are affected and will be automatically fixed without any per-package kludges when the fixed rpm hits the distro repos. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 11 15:44:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 11:44:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188369] Review Request: ctapi-cyberjack In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605111544.k4BFiuKG004663@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ctapi-cyberjack https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188369 frank-buettner at gmx.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 11 15:48:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 11:48:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187622] Review Request: cowbell In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605111548.k4BFmM9E005374@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cowbell https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187622 ------- Additional Comments From foolish at guezz.net 2006-05-11 11:48 EST ------- Updated spec: http://folk.ntnu.no/sindrb/packages/cowbell.spec SRPM: http://folk.ntnu.no/sindrb/packages/cowbell-0.2.7.1-2.src.rpm Changes: - Add missing mono-core and gtk-sharp2 Requires - Add scriplets for gtk+ icon cache - Removed ChangeLog from %doc - Don't include static library - Remove gettext BuildRequires -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 11 16:12:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 12:12:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188369] Review Request: ctapi-cyberjack In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605111612.k4BGCxMm010488@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ctapi-cyberjack https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188369 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-05-11 12:12 EST ------- (In reply to comment #77) > > Thank's now it works. > > Must the file called ctapi-cyberjack-2.0.8-13FC5.src.rpm or > > ctapi-cyberjack-FC5.src.rpm simple ctapi-cyberjack.src.rpm ? > > I don't mean to offend, but I am surprised that by the end of this lengthy > process you are asking basic questions like this. Please review the packaging > guidelines and package naming guidelines carefully, as understanding them are > very important to Fedora cvsextras membership. > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines Warren, He was asking howot name the SRPM to pass to cvs-import.sh a bit strange question I must admit but nothing something that can be found in the guidelines AFAIK. Frank, I just saw on the cvs-commit that you committed changes to an FC-4 version, I hope your CVS branch request got handled that quickly, or did you do something else to get the other branches? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 11 16:20:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 12:20:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188369] Review Request: ctapi-cyberjack In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605111620.k4BGKuQV012579@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ctapi-cyberjack https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188369 ------- Additional Comments From frank-buettner at gmx.net 2006-05-11 12:20 EST ------- All packages are build perfect for FC4 and FC5. Now the packages are waiting to be signed. The changes at the FC4 version are only the parts in the specfile that for FC4. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 11 16:24:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 12:24:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190878] Review Request: childplay_plugins - Plugins for childsplay (educational games for young children) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605111624.k4BGO8v4013413@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: childplay_plugins - Plugins for childsplay (educational games for young children) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190878 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-05-11 12:23 EST ------- Ville, Thanks for the comment, but bug 89500 is about PreReq's which this package doesn't use. childsplay Requires: childsplay_plugins and childsplay_plugins Requires: childsplay. Assuming rpm is indeed fixed todo proper erase ordening how do a specify that I want childsplay_plugins to be removed first? Mike, I tend to not fixing this atleast not in a way working around soon to be fixed rpm bugs. Can you live with that? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 11 16:28:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 12:28:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188369] Review Request: ctapi-cyberjack In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605111628.k4BGSd0C014453@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ctapi-cyberjack https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188369 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-05-11 12:28 EST ------- Frank, That doesn't answer my question. When you import into CVS only the -devel branch gets created, how did you get the FC-4 FC-5 branches (so fast) Normally you would edit: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/CVSSyncNeeded And then wait for a human todo the branching. Now I'm assuming that you were luky and the human did the branching quickly, no problem then. But since you're still a bit unexperienced it could be you found some other creative way to create the branches which would be not so good. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 11 16:30:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 12:30:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190101] Review Request: php-pear-Log In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605111630.k4BGU2XQ015399@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Log https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190101 ------- Additional Comments From Fedora at FamilleCollet.com 2006-05-11 12:30 EST ------- There are movement, see Bug #190066. The new php-pear-1.4.9 will allow us to progress. Description used, is the one provide upstream on the package.xml. I must agree it isn't very descriptive, but i don't know if it's a good idea to chance it. For %prep. This comment is from pear template.spec # XXX Source files location is missing here in pear cmd It mean pear is only use to build "pearrc" (source will be provide in %install) The Sanity check is use to check the job done by pear, because version 1.4.6 sometime left %[buildroot} relative path in .php file. Using pear-1.4.9 and --packagingroot (insteaed of -R) solve this problem. Of course i can remove it, but it could be useful for people who want to rebuild the RPM for another distro. %postun workaround ( ... || true) is for pear-1.4.6 which is unable to uninstall somme package. No problem with pear-1.4.9. This workaround is to avoid scriptlet (and uninstall) failure. In this case the package is uninstalled, but not unregistred in pear extension list. A solution could be to (Build)Requires pear > 1.4.7 ??? Yes php-pear(PEAR) is provide by php-pear. php-pear-1.4.9 is in rawhide and in FC5-testing (see Bug #190252) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 11 16:40:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 12:40:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190101] Review Request: php-pear-Log In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605111640.k4BGelmo018996@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Log https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190101 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-05-11 12:40 EST ------- > Description used, is the one provide upstream on the package.xml. I must agree > it isn't very descriptive, but i don't know if it's a good idea to chance it. Upstream can be broken in many ways. We have to change the descriptions for Perl modules as well. Since the summary is the first thing the users will see, it must be as descriptive as possible in the 60 or so characters available. > For %prep. This comment is from pear template.spec Do we have a pear template in fedora-rpmdevtools? I don't see one. [sanity check] > Of course i can remove it, but it could be useful for people who want to rebuild > the RPM for another distro. We don't usually worry about that, but my point is that rpmlint is our sanity checker and it's worth discussing whether it should be taught to check for things like that. Are you targeting FC4 with these packages? If not, we should just require the unbuggy php-pear version once it has been released. I'm still waiting for either a buildable rawhide or the updated php-pear package in FC5 to do a full review. If anyone can answer the question of whether the scriptlets need Requires(post) and Requires(postun) dependencies, please chip in. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 11 16:41:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 12:41:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190878] Review Request: childplay_plugins - Plugins for childsplay (educational games for young children) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605111641.k4BGfADr019097@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: childplay_plugins - Plugins for childsplay (educational games for young children) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190878 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2006-05-11 12:40 EST ------- (In reply to comment #9) > childsplay Requires: childsplay_plugins and childsplay_plugins > Requires: childsplay. Assuming rpm is indeed fixed todo proper erase ordening > how do a specify that I want childsplay_plugins to be removed first? Ah, so you have a dependency loop, I didn't know that. It's possible that bug 89500 isn't probably going to change anything then. Preferred fix: get rid of the loop and use plain Requires. Other ideas that have worked at least sometime: http://rpm.org/max-rpm-snapshot/s1-rpm-depend-manual-dependencies.html#S3-RPM-DEPEND-FINE-GRAINED (...and owning the dirs in both packages is still an option...) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 11 16:42:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 12:42:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187266] Review Request: gprolog - GNU Prolog is a free Prolog compiler In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605111642.k4BGg3Cs019327@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gprolog - GNU Prolog is a free Prolog compiler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187266 ------- Additional Comments From Jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2006-05-11 12:41 EST ------- I have create a new release of the RPMs. SPEC: http://www.herr-schmitt.de/pub/gprolog/gprolog.spec SRPM: http://www.herr-schmitt.de/pub/gprolog/gprolog-1.2.19-4.src.rpm Becouse I don't have a 64-bit engine, it will be nice, if anyone can doublecheck the use of the --libdir option suggested in comment #7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 11 16:52:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 12:52:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191111] Review Request: perl-Test-Cmd - Perl module for portable testing of commands and scripts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605111652.k4BGqLPl021544@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-Cmd - Perl module for portable testing of commands and scripts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191111 jpo at di.uminho.pt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From jpo at di.uminho.pt 2006-05-11 12:52 EST ------- Thanks for the review. Imported and build for FC-4, FC-5, and devel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 11 16:54:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 12:54:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188369] Review Request: ctapi-cyberjack In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605111654.k4BGsKaa022023@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ctapi-cyberjack https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188369 ------- Additional Comments From frank-buettner at gmx.net 2006-05-11 12:54 EST ------- Ups. Yes I have edit the wiki page. And ca.10 minirs later I have run cvs co ctapi-cyberjack ans all was fine. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 11 17:06:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 13:06:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188369] Review Request: ctapi-cyberjack In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605111706.k4BH65ve024217@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ctapi-cyberjack https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188369 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-05-11 13:05 EST ------- Good, that was a quick CVs branch, don't get used to it :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 11 17:06:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 13:06:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190878] Review Request: childplay_plugins - Plugins for childsplay (educational games for young children) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605111706.k4BH6BYd024239@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: childplay_plugins - Plugins for childsplay (educational games for young children) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190878 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #128885|0 |1 is obsolete| | Attachment #128892|0 |1 is obsolete| | ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-05-11 13:06 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=128902) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=128902&action=view) improved specfile > Ah, so you have a dependency loop, I didn't know that. It's possible that bug > 89500 isn't probably going to change anything then. Preferred fix: get rid of > the loop and use plain Requires. Other ideas that have worked at least sometime: > http://rpm.org/max-rpm-snapshot/s1-rpm-depend-manual-dependencies.html#S3-RPM-DEPEND-FINE-GRAINED > (...and owning the dirs in both packages is still an option...) Quoting from the above URL: "A plain Requires is enough to ensure proper installation order if there are no dependency loops present in the transaction. If dependency loops are present and cannot be avoided, packagers should strive to construct them in a way that the order of installation of the the this way interdependent packages does not matter." So owning dirs in both packages indeed seems the best idea, new -3 release doing just that attached. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 11 17:18:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 13:18:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188369] Review Request: ctapi-cyberjack In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605111718.k4BHISlf026781@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ctapi-cyberjack https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188369 ------- Additional Comments From frank-buettner at gmx.net 2006-05-11 13:18 EST ------- Thanks a lot for your patience with me:) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 11 17:24:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 13:24:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190101] Review Request: php-pear-Log In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605111724.k4BHOS7P028047@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Log https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190101 ------- Additional Comments From Fedora at FamilleCollet.com 2006-05-11 13:24 EST ------- > Do we have a pear template in fedora-rpmdevtools? I don't see one. /usr/share/pear/data/PEAR/template.spec provides by php-pear (old command : pear makerpm). or /usr/share/pear/data/PEAR_Command_Packaging/template.spec provides by php-pear-PEAR-Command-Packaging (Bug #185423, new command pear make-rpm-spec, soon in Extras). I think this template is not really suitable for Extras and could really by improve, but i'm not the packager for this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 11 17:35:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 13:35:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190878] Review Request: childplay_plugins - Plugins for childsplay (educational games for young children) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605111735.k4BHZijM030670@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: childplay_plugins - Plugins for childsplay (educational games for young children) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190878 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2006-05-11 13:35 EST ------- (Forgot the disclaimer: the "fine grained deps" max-rpm chapter was written by yours truly.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 11 17:35:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 13:35:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191402] New: Review Request: mercurial-0.9 Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191402 Summary: Review Request: mercurial-0.9 Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: ndbecker2 at verizon.net QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://nbecker.dyndns.org:8080/mercurial.spec SRPM URL: http://nbecker.dyndns.org:8080/mercurial-0.9-1.src.rpm Description: Mercurial: a fast, lightweight Source Control Management system designed for efficient handling of very large distributed projects. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 11 17:41:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 13:41:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189755] Review Request: pypoker-eval - Python Interface to poker-eval In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605111741.k4BHfRkX031708@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pypoker-eval - Python Interface to poker-eval https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189755 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-05-11 13:41 EST ------- Please ignore the fact that I completely missed the %check section. The test suite is not verbose about its passage, but it does pass just fine. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 11 18:00:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 14:00:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190878] Review Request: childplay_plugins - Plugins for childsplay (educational games for young children) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605111800.k4BI0eLF004348@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: childplay_plugins - Plugins for childsplay (educational games for young children) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190878 ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2006-05-11 14:00 EST ------- The multiple ownership of the dirs is fine with me. Removal of the packages no longer leaves dangling directories. All other MUST items fixed, and SHOULD items adequately addressed/explained. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 11 18:05:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 14:05:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191402] Review Request: mercurial-0.9 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605111805.k4BI5Mw4006144@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mercurial-0.9 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191402 bos at serpentine.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bos at serpentine.com ------- Additional Comments From bos at serpentine.com 2006-05-11 14:05 EST ------- Thanks. It would be nice if the spec file installed some docs. Unfortunately, the Mercurial man pages are generated using asciidoc, which isn't packaged. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 11 18:08:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 14:08:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191402] Review Request: mercurial-0.9 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605111808.k4BI8RXG007663@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mercurial-0.9 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191402 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |wtogami at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2006-05-11 14:08 EST ------- Do you know that mercurial-0.8 is already in Extras? Did the old owner give up? Re-review is not bad, but just want to make sure you talk to the existing owner. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 11 18:12:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 14:12:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191402] Review Request: mercurial-0.9 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605111812.k4BIC9SK008739@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mercurial-0.9 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191402 ------- Additional Comments From ndbecker2 at verizon.net 2006-05-11 14:12 EST ------- No, I didn't know that! I tried to check, must have made a mistake. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 11 18:44:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 14:44:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 186327] Review Request: tcltls In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605111844.k4BIilMA019174@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tcltls https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=186327 ------- Additional Comments From tjikkun at xs4all.nl 2006-05-11 14:44 EST ------- Wart, thank you for your comments and for teaching me stuff. I knew about those 2 things to get sponsored. It just seems i picked a really bad time to start this packaging stuff, since at the moment I am really busy with work/school and my computer is not playing nicely (time for replacement, but no money). Work is calming down a bit (I hope) so I think I will be able to do some reviews (making comments) soon. Sander -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 11 18:51:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 14:51:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190876] Review Request: childplay In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605111851.k4BIps53021786@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: childplay https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190876 ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2006-05-11 14:51 EST ------- This explanation works for me. This is still APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 11 19:25:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 15:25:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191402] Review Request: mercurial-0.9 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605111925.k4BJPxMU030885@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mercurial-0.9 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191402 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-05-11 15:25 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > Thanks. It would be nice if the spec file installed some docs. > > Unfortunately, the Mercurial man pages are generated using asciidoc, which isn't > packaged. asciidoc has been in Extras for some time actually. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 11 19:32:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 15:32:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 186919] Review Request: eric: Python IDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605111932.k4BJWQjs000500@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eric: Python IDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=186919 ------- Additional Comments From yehjj at pchome.com.tw 2006-05-11 15:32 EST ------- In Fedora Core 5, install package "eric-3.9.0-1.fc4.i386.rpm": $ eric3 Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/eric3/eric3.py", line 32, in ? from UI.E3SingleApplication import E3SingleApplicationClient File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/eric3/UI/E3SingleApplication.py", line 15, in ? from Utilities.SingleApplication import SingleApplicationClient, SingleApplicationServer File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/eric3/Utilities/__init__.py", line 22, in ? import Preferences File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/eric3/Preferences/__init__.py", line 29, in ? class Prefs: File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/eric3/Preferences/__init__.py", line 197, in Prefs editorAPIDefaults = { NameError: name 'pyApiList' is not defined In order to work around this, patch it with: --- /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/eric3/Preferences/__init__.py.00 2006-05-02 01:38:16.000000000 +0800 +++ /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/eric3/Preferences/__init__.py 2006-05-12 03:32:04.000000000 +0800 @@ -194,6 +194,8 @@ class Prefs: "MonospacedFont" : "monospace,12,-1,5,50,0,0,0,0,0" } + # Fix eric3 initial problem "NameError: name 'pyApiList' is not defined" + pyApiList = QStringList() editorAPIDefaults = { "Python" : pyApiList, "C++" : QStringList(), @@ -203,7 +205,6 @@ class Prefs: "JavaScript" : QStringList() } - pyApiList = QStringList() #for file in ["python"]: for file in ["python", "qt", "qttext", "qtcanvas", "qtgl", "qtnetwork", "qtsql", "qttable", "qtui", "qtxml"]: pyApiList.append(QString("/usr/share/eric@/%s.api" % file)) Then it works in FC5. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 11 19:34:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 15:34:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189375] Re-Review Request: Maelstrom: space combat game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605111934.k4BJYP3P001128@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Re-Review Request: Maelstrom: space combat game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189375 ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2006-05-11 15:34 EST ------- On to the full review: rpmlint output: E: Maelstrom file-in-usr-marked-as-conffile /usr/games/Maelstrom/Maelstrom-Scores - This can be ignored E: Maelstrom non-standard-executable-perm /usr/bin/Maelstrom 02755 - This is ok per the Games SIG guidelines for scoreboard files E: Maelstrom standard-dir-owned-by-package /usr/share/icons - Change the %files line to %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor/48x48/apps/* W: Maelstrom buildprereq-use SDL-devel, SDL_net-devel E: Maelstrom broken-syntax-in-scriptlet-requires BuildPrereq: SDL-devel, SDL_net-devel - Change BuildPrereq: to BuildRequires: MUST ==== * Source matches upstream * Package and spec file named appropriately * spec file legible and in Am. English. * Builds in mock on: FC4-i386 FC4-x86_64 devel-i386 devel-x86_64 * No locales * No -devel package needed * No need for -docs subpackage * No shared libs * .dekstop file installed correctly MUSTFIX ======= * See rpmlint notes above * BR: SDL-devel is redundant. It's picked up by SDL_net-devel * License is GPL, not LGPL * License file is included in upstream tarball, but not in %doc * There is a questionable clause in the COPYING file: "The artwork and sounds used by Maelstrom are copyright Ambrosia Software (http://www.ambrosiasw.com) and may not be redistributed separately from the Maelstrom public GPL release." * Makefile and Makefile.in should not be included in /usr/share/Maelstrom/Images or %{_docdir}/Docs SHOULD ====== * The following is a nice shell trick, but would be more readable if each file were removed individually, one per line. rm -f $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_bindir}/{Maelstrom-netd,macres,playwave,snd2wav} ...change to... rm -f $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_bindir}/Maelstrom-netd rm -f $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_bindir}/macres (and so on) * The BuildRoot tag is almost there. From http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 11 19:47:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 15:47:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191218] Review Request: PyScript - Postscript graphics with Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605111947.k4BJl4Qd004385@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PyScript - Postscript graphics with Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191218 tjikkun at xs4all.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tjikkun at xs4all.nl ------- Additional Comments From tjikkun at xs4all.nl 2006-05-11 15:46 EST ------- My first review, and i am not a sponsor I will just list some of the things you probably want to fix: - BuildRoot should be %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} - n) - Specfile should be in the format %{name}.spec - Package is marked as relocatable, is that really needed? It probably isn't so that has to be fixed (get rid of Prefix). If it really is necessary you need to explain why. - some paths are not replaced with RPM macros - The BuildRoot must be cleaned at the beginning of %install (add rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 11 19:47:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 15:47:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191110] Review Request: perl-Devel-Cover - Code coverage metrics for Perl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605111947.k4BJls3U004675@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Devel-Cover - Code coverage metrics for Perl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191110 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |tibbs at math.uh.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 11 19:49:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 15:49:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190878] Review Request: childplay_plugins - Plugins for childsplay (educational games for young children) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605111949.k4BJnNrq004928@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: childplay_plugins - Plugins for childsplay (educational games for young children) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190878 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-05-11 15:49 EST ------- Imported & Build. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 11 19:49:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 15:49:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190876] Review Request: childplay In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605111949.k4BJnnWe005051@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: childplay https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190876 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Bug 190876 depends on bug 190878, which changed state. Bug 190878 Summary: Review Request: childplay_plugins - Plugins for childsplay (educational games for young children) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190878 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-05-11 15:49 EST ------- Imported & Build. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 11 19:49:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 15:49:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190876] Review Request: childplay In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605111949.k4BJnu38005110@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: childplay https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190876 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Bug 190876 depends on bug 190878, which changed state. Bug 190878 Summary: Review Request: childplay_plugins - Plugins for childsplay (educational games for young children) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190878 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-05-11 15:49 EST ------- Imported & Build. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 11 19:56:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 15:56:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191040] Review Request: fedora-package-config-apt - Configuration files for the apt package manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605111956.k4BJuXl6006667@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fedora-package-config-apt - Configuration files for the apt package manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191040 ville.skytta at iki.fi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |ville.skytta at iki.fi OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2006-05-11 15:56 EST ------- Issues: - Shouldn't the package be noarch? - Missing dependency on apt (similar issue seems to exist in the corresponding smart package too, by the way) Cosmetics: - Summary and %description could mention Fedora even though it's in %{name}, and %description could be expanded a bit. - Upstream spelling is APT-RPM, that could be used in summary and description too -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 11 20:06:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 16:06:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 186919] Review Request: eric: Python IDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605112006.k4BK6fkm008968@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eric: Python IDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=186919 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-05-11 16:06 EST ------- Thanks. * Thu May 11 2006 Rex Dieter 3.9.0-2 - merge -fonts,-api patches into -prefs patch, make it work on fc5/python24 too Spec Name or Url: http://kde-redhat.unl.edu/apt/kde-redhat/SPECS/eric-3.9.0-2.spec SRPM Name or Url: http://kde-redhat.unl.edu/apt/kde-redhat/all/SRPMS.stable/eric-3.9.0-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 11 20:08:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 16:08:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187266] Review Request: gprolog - GNU Prolog is a free Prolog compiler In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605112008.k4BK8SOs009643@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gprolog - GNU Prolog is a free Prolog compiler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187266 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-05-11 16:08 EST ------- The build completes in mock on FC5, x86_64. However, things don't look right in the built package: lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 33 May 11 15:10 /usr/bin/gprolog -> ../lib/gprolog-1.2.19/bin/gprolog -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 864648 May 11 15:10 /usr/lib64/gprolog-1.2.19/bin/gprolog That link seems to be dangling. The same for all of the links in the gprolog-compiler package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 11 21:00:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 17:00:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187266] Review Request: gprolog - GNU Prolog is a free Prolog compiler In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605112100.k4BL09qW023706@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gprolog - GNU Prolog is a free Prolog compiler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187266 ------- Additional Comments From gemi at bluewin.ch 2006-05-11 16:59 EST ------- I didn't want to urge you to split off the compiler package. In fact after looking at it, I would say it would be better not to do it. As for the case of x86_64, I think we should let the build be in /usr/lib. Otherwise it may mean patching Makefiles to use the correct path (possibly the %prefix/lib dir is hardcoded somewhere. If it is easy to fix, do it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 11 21:02:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 17:02:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191040] Review Request: fedora-package-config-apt - Configuration files for the apt package manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605112102.k4BL26tV024467@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fedora-package-config-apt - Configuration files for the apt package manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191040 ------- Additional Comments From Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net 2006-05-11 17:01 EST ------- Fixed in Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~athimm/fedorasubmit/fedora-package-config-apt.spec * Thu May 11 2006 Axel Thimm - 5.89-3 - Apply comments from review #191040c3 (by Ville). - Fix summary and description - Config files are arch-independent, so we should become noarch - Create versioned dependency on apt (make sure it's repo-md capable) This creates a circular dependency which should not impose any issues. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 11 22:01:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 18:01:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191434] New: Review Request: xarchon - Arcade board game Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191434 Summary: Review Request: xarchon - Arcade board game Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://home.zonnet.nl/jwrdegoede/xarchon.spec SRPM URL: http://home.zonnet.nl/jwrdegoede/xarchon-0.50-1.src.rpm Description: XArchon is a chess with a twist board game. It is modelled after the golden oldie Archon game created by Freefall Associates. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 11 22:05:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 18:05:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187622] Review Request: cowbell In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605112205.k4BM5Ioe006993@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cowbell https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187622 bdpepple at ameritech.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|jpmahowald at gmail.com |bdpepple at ameritech.net OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at ameritech.net 2006-05-11 18:05 EST ------- Changes in response to the review in comment #10 look good. * rpmlint is clean. +1 PUBLISH -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 11 22:19:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 18:19:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188445] Review Request: bootconf In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605112219.k4BMJDMe009486@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bootconf https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188445 ------- Additional Comments From mrsam at courier-mta.com 2006-05-11 18:19 EST ------- bootconf is not a multiple bootloader configuration tool. bootconf is a configuration tool for the kernel boot command line: enable/disable rhgb boot; enable/disable quiet boot; enable/disable VESA framebuffer. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 11 22:54:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 18:54:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189197] Review Request: gtk2hs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605112254.k4BMsfFK017002@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtk2hs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189197 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2006-05-11 18:54 EST ------- Built fine, but needed to fix a couple more requires: http://people.redhat.com/petersen/extras/gtk2hs.spec http://people.redhat.com/petersen/extras/gtk2hs-0.9.10-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 12 01:59:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 21:59:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 179040] Review Request: socat In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605120159.k4C1x0iC021450@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: socat https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=179040 ------- Additional Comments From paul at xtdnet.nl 2006-05-11 21:58 EST ------- Some more packages only put configure.in/configure.ac in their development (CVS) tree, and just put the configure script and not the autoconf/automake in. Sometimes this is done to prevent dependancies on autoconfig/automake. I don't think it is a big issue for building this package. permissions on the debug rpm files after install is 644 for files and 755 for directories. So everyone can read everything. What is exactly going wrong? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 12 04:16:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 00:16:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191110] Review Request: perl-Devel-Cover - Code coverage metrics for Perl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605120416.k4C4GdlN022262@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Devel-Cover - Code coverage metrics for Perl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191110 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-05-12 00:16 EST ------- rpmlint complains: W: perl-Devel-Cover doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/perl-Devel-Cover-0.55/buildperl perl(lib) The buildperl script probably shouldn't be executable. Makefile.PL warns: Devel::Cover 0.55 has not been tested with perl 5.008008. but the test suite seems fine. Review: * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written, uses macros consistently and follows the Perl specfile template. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. It's not included separately in the package, but this is not necessary as the upstream tarball does not include it. * source files match upstream: 6bb9ddcd7a9e4d87c02b8bbea7ad3c4a Devel-Cover-0.55.tar.gz 6bb9ddcd7a9e4d87c02b8bbea7ad3c4a Devel-Cover-0.55.tar.gz-srpm * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). X rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane. O shared libraries are present, but they are internal to Perl so ldconfig doesn't need to be called. * package is not relocatable. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * %clean is present. * %check is present and all tests pass: All tests successful. Files=38, Tests=38, 72 wallclock secs (69.46 cusr + 2.87 csys = 72.33 CPU) * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no libtool .la droppings. * not a GUI app. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 12 04:17:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 00:17:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 179040] Review Request: socat In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605120417.k4C4H4FS022387@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: socat https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=179040 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2006-05-12 00:16 EST ------- (In reply to comment #9) > Some more packages only put configure.in/configure.ac in their development (CVS) > tree, and just put the configure script and not the autoconf/automake in. Yes, there exist a broken packages and incompetent maintainers. > Sometimes this is done to prevent dependancies on autoconfig/automake. I don't > think it is a big issue for building this package. I consider this as blocker for 2 reasons: 1. LEGAL This configure script is clearly autoconf generated. The package claims to be GPL'ed but ships incomplete sources. I.e. I consider this package not to be GPL compliant and not to be OSI complaint. 2. TECHNICAL 2.1 It is hardly possible to fix/maintain packages with incomplete sources. You might know where the source file might be located, but will the person to adapt this package to FC8 in 2 years still know? 2.2 A package being maintained upstream this way, justifies strong doubts on the code's quality. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 12 04:28:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 00:28:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191239] Review Request: qjackctl - Qt based JACK control application In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605120428.k4C4Spf8024345@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qjackctl - Qt based JACK control application https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191239 tjikkun at xs4all.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tjikkun at xs4all.nl ------- Additional Comments From tjikkun at xs4all.nl 2006-05-12 00:28 EST ------- not a full review yet but some points you need to improve: - Package does not follow Fedora's package naming guildlines (wiki: PackageNamingGuidelines) release should be 1, 2, 3, not 2.0 - BuildRequires: desktop-file-utils is missing %define desktop_vendor planetccrma - desktop_vendor is fedora :) - add to desktop-file-install: --add-category X-Fedora # distros with 2.4.x kernels should use jackstart as the default %{?fc1:%define usejackstart 1} %{?rh9:%define usejackstart 1} - this define can go since extras doesn't go that far back -just use rm istead of %__rm macro -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 12 04:41:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 00:41:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191452] New: Review Request: orpie - scientific calculator Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191452 Summary: Review Request: orpie - scientific calculator Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: lists at forevermore.net QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://forevermore.net/files/packages/orpie/orpie.spec SRPM URL: http://forevermore.net/files/packages/orpie/orpie-1.4.3-1.src.rpm Description: Orpie is a fullscreen console-based RPN calculator that uses the curses library. Its operation is similar to that of modern HP calculators, but data entry has been optimized for efficiency on a PC keyboard. Its features include extensive scientific calculator functionality, command completion, and a visible interactive stack. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 12 07:16:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 03:16:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 179040] Review Request: socat In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605120716.k4C7Gc82025396@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: socat https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=179040 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-05-12 03:16 EST ------- (In reply to comment #9) > Some more packages only put configure.in/configure.ac in their development (CVS) > tree, and just put the configure script and not the autoconf/automake in. > Sometimes this is done to prevent dependancies on autoconfig/automake. I don't > think it is a big issue for building this package. In addition to Ralf's comments, which I agree with, I'd add that it's normal practice to ship the configure.in/configure.ac and that these do not introduce buildreqs on autotools if the timestamps on the files are correct, i.e. configure is later than the files used to generate it. > permissions on the debug rpm files after install is 644 for files and 755 for > directories. So everyone can read everything. What is exactly going wrong? I was going to look into this but the package (ftp://ftp.xelerance.com/socat/binaries/fedora/4/SRPMS/socat-1.4.3.1-1.src.rpm) doesn't build for me on my FC5 i386 desktop, with the same failure mode as in Comment #4. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 12 09:27:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 05:27:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191218] Review Request: PyScript - Postscript graphics with Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605120927.k4C9RooC030277@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PyScript - Postscript graphics with Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191218 ------- Additional Comments From paultcochrane at gmail.com 2006-05-12 05:27 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) Thanks for the review! > - BuildRoot should be %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} > - n) Corrected. > - Specfile should be in the format %{name}.spec Corrected. > - Package is marked as relocatable, is that really needed? It probably isn't so > that has to be fixed (get rid of Prefix). If it really is necessary you need to > explain why. Removed Prefix: attribute from spec file and replaced %{prefix} with the actual path. This, however, makes rpmlint give a lot of errors saying that the path is hardcoded. Is this correct? > - some paths are not replaced with RPM macros Sorry, I'm not 100% sure which ones are incorrect. > - The BuildRoot must be cleaned at the beginning of %install (add rm -rf > $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) Corrected. The new SPEC and SRPM file URLs are: Spec URL: http://dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/pyscript/pyscript.spec SRPM URL: http://dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/pyscript/pyscript-0.6-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 12 10:04:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 06:04:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191218] Review Request: PyScript - Postscript graphics with Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605121004.k4CA4FgL007045@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PyScript - Postscript graphics with Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191218 ------- Additional Comments From tjikkun at xs4all.nl 2006-05-12 06:04 EST ------- no time to really look at the specfile now but read http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/RPMMacros there you will find the correct macro's to replace the paths with. ( %{_libdir} ) Also increase your release number everytime you make a change, even during review and put your changes in the changelog. also see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-b7d622f4bb245300199c6a33128acce5fb453213 for how to format the changelog entries Good luck -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 12 10:47:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 06:47:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191473] New: Review Request: kdiff3-0.9.88-1.src.rpm Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191473 Summary: Review Request: kdiff3-0.9.88-1.src.rpm Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: ndbecker2 at verizon.net QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://nbecker.dyndns.org:8080/kdiff3.spec SRPM URL: http://nbecker.dyndns.org:8080/kdiff3-0.9.88-1.src.rpm Description: KDiff3 is a program that - compares and merges two or three input files or directories, - shows the differences line by line and character by character (!), - provides an automatic merge-facility and - an integrated editor for comfortable solving of merge-conflicts - has support for KDE-KIO (ftp, sftp, http, fish, smb) - and has an intuitive graphical user interface. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 12 10:49:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 06:49:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191110] Review Request: perl-Devel-Cover - Code coverage metrics for Perl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605121049.k4CAnofC018419@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Devel-Cover - Code coverage metrics for Perl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191110 ------- Additional Comments From jpo at di.uminho.pt 2006-05-12 06:49 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > rpmlint complains: > > W: perl-Devel-Cover doc-file-dependency > /usr/share/doc/perl-Devel-Cover-0.55/buildperl perl(lib) > > The buildperl script probably shouldn't be executable. Oops! Corrected in: http://gsd.di.uminho.pt/jpo/software/fedora/perl-Devel-Cover-0.55-2.src.rpm (specfile link: the previous one) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 12 11:27:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 07:27:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191218] Review Request: PyScript - Postscript graphics with Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605121127.k4CBR6U4026578@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PyScript - Postscript graphics with Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191218 ------- Additional Comments From paultcochrane at gmail.com 2006-05-12 07:26 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) Thanks again for the help! :-) I have updated the SRPM and SPEC files as advised, they are at: Spec URL: http://dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/pyscript/pyscript.spec SRPM URL: http://dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/pyscript/pyscript-0.6-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 12 12:40:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 08:40:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191473] Review Request: kdiff3-0.9.88-1.src.rpm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605121240.k4CCeH5T012295@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdiff3-0.9.88-1.src.rpm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191473 laurent.rineau__fc_extra at normalesup.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |laurent.rineau__fc_extra at nor | |malesup.org ------- Additional Comments From laurent.rineau__fc_extra at normalesup.org 2006-05-12 08:40 EST ------- Not a formal review, but I have several remarks: * MUST fix: Source0 URL should be http://dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/kdiff3/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz * MUST fix rpmlint warnings and errors: W: kdiff3 summary-not-capitalized compare + merge 2 or 3 files or directories Easy to fix. E: kdiff3 standard-dir-owned-by-package /usr/share/icons E: kdiff3 standard-dir-owned-by-package /usr/share/man E: kdiff3 standard-dir-owned-by-package /usr/share/man/man1 See http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines, section "File and Directory Ownership". W: kdiff3 dangling-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/da/kdiff3/common /usr/share/doc/HTML/da/common W: kdiff3 dangling-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/de/kdiff3/common /usr/share/doc/HTML/de/common W: kdiff3 dangling-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/kdiff3/common /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/common W: kdiff3 dangling-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/et/kdiff3/common /usr/share/doc/HTML/et/common W: kdiff3 dangling-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/fr/kdiff3/common /usr/share/doc/HTML/fr/common W: kdiff3 dangling-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/it/kdiff3/common /usr/share/doc/HTML/it/common W: kdiff3 dangling-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/pt/kdiff3/common /usr/share/doc/HTML/pt/common W: kdiff3 dangling-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/sv/kdiff3/common /usr/share/doc/HTML/sv/common W: kdiff3 symlink-should-be-relative /usr/share/doc/HTML/da/kdiff3/common /usr/share/doc/HTML/da/common W: kdiff3 symlink-should-be-relative /usr/share/doc/HTML/de/kdiff3/common /usr/share/doc/HTML/de/common W: kdiff3 symlink-should-be-relative /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/kdiff3/common /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/common W: kdiff3 symlink-should-be-relative /usr/share/doc/HTML/et/kdiff3/common /usr/share/doc/HTML/et/common W: kdiff3 symlink-should-be-relative /usr/share/doc/HTML/fr/kdiff3/common /usr/share/doc/HTML/fr/common W: kdiff3 symlink-should-be-relative /usr/share/doc/HTML/it/kdiff3/common /usr/share/doc/HTML/it/common W: kdiff3 symlink-should-be-relative /usr/share/doc/HTML/pt/kdiff3/common /usr/share/doc/HTML/pt/common W: kdiff3 symlink-should-be-relative /usr/share/doc/HTML/sv/kdiff3/common /usr/share/doc/HTML/sv/common Seems to be a usual problem with KDE packages. I do not know what should be done. Kdiff3 version 0.9.89 has been release (2006-04-09). Perhaps you should update your tarball. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 12 12:54:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 08:54:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191473] Review Request: kdiff3-0.9.88-1.src.rpm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605121254.k4CCsQ4X016172@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdiff3-0.9.88-1.src.rpm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191473 ------- Additional Comments From ndbecker2 at verizon.net 2006-05-12 08:54 EST ------- http://kdiff3.sourceforge.net/, says: Current version: 0.9.89 (2006-04-09) (A serious regression when accessing KDE-KIO was reported. If you need this, please use 0.9.88 instead.) So, I am staying with 0.9.88 Please see http://nbecker.dyndns.org:8080/kdiff3-0.9.88-2.src.rpm I have fixed the problems you cite, except for 'symlink-should-be-relative'. Anyone know how to fix this, or is it important? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 12 13:02:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 09:02:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191473] Review Request: kdiff3-0.9.88-1.src.rpm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605121302.k4CD22e2017737@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdiff3-0.9.88-1.src.rpm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191473 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-05-12 09:01 EST ------- The symlink thing is *that* important, but it's fixable. I use this snippet in my KDE rpms: (you already use something close to this) in %%install: ## File lists # locale's %find_lang %{name} || touch %{name}.lang # HTML (1.0) HTML_DIR=$(kde-config --expandvars --install html) if [ -d $RPM_BUILD_ROOT$HTML_DIR ]; then for lang_dir in $RPM_BUILD_ROOT$HTML_DIR/* ; do if [ -d $lang_dir ]; then lang=$(basename $lang_dir) echo "%lang($lang) $HTML_DIR/$lang/*" >> %{name}.lang # replace absolute symlinks with relative ones pushd $lang_dir for i in *; do [ -d $i -a -L $i/common ] && rm -f $i/common && ln -sf ../common $i/common done popd fi done fi -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 12 13:07:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 09:07:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191473] Review Request: kdiff3-0.9.88-1.src.rpm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605121307.k4CD7kV1018954@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdiff3-0.9.88-1.src.rpm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191473 ------- Additional Comments From laurent.rineau__fc_extra at normalesup.org 2006-05-12 09:07 EST ------- Rex, what about the "dandling symlink" stuff? People on #fedora-extras seem to agree that it can be ignored, while not perfect. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 12 13:11:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 09:11:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191473] Review Request: kdiff3-0.9.88-1.src.rpm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605121311.k4CDB5cC019679@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdiff3-0.9.88-1.src.rpm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191473 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-05-12 09:11 EST ------- Dangling symlink = symlink to a file/dir not in *this* pkg. In the case of kde apps, %{_docdir}/HTML can be expected to contain lots of them. It can be ignored. The snippet I posted will take care of the "symlink-should-be-relative" warnings only. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 12 13:13:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 09:13:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191473] Review Request: kdiff3-0.9.88-1.src.rpm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605121313.k4CDDNdF020032@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdiff3-0.9.88-1.src.rpm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191473 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-05-12 09:13 EST ------- I noticed my comment #3 was mis-typed. I meant to say: The symlink thing is not *that* important. ^^^ (forgot the not) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 12 13:14:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 09:14:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 173459] Review Request: initng In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605121314.k4CDE8SR020230@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 daner964 at student.liu.se changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #128844|0 |1 is obsolete| | ------- Additional Comments From daner964 at student.liu.se 2006-05-12 09:13 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=128936) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=128936&action=view) initng 0.6.6-1 spec file - New upstream version - Once again commented out the selinux stuff since I can't get it to work. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 12 13:15:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 09:15:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191473] Review Request: kdiff3-0.9.88-1.src.rpm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605121315.k4CDFori020655@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdiff3-0.9.88-1.src.rpm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191473 ------- Additional Comments From ndbecker2 at verizon.net 2006-05-12 09:15 EST ------- Symlink thing is fixed. Thanks Rex. http://nbecker.dyndns.org:8080/kdiff3-0.9.88-3.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 12 13:20:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 09:20:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191473] Review Request: kdiff3-0.9.88-1.src.rpm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605121320.k4CDKmm4021751@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdiff3-0.9.88-1.src.rpm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191473 ------- Additional Comments From laurent.rineau__fc_extra at normalesup.org 2006-05-12 09:20 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > Dangling symlink = symlink to a file/dir not in *this* pkg. I understood that. Packages kde-i18n-$LANG provide the linked directories. > In the case of kde > apps, %{_docdir}/HTML can be expected to contain lots of them. > It can be ignored. I agree. And #fedora-extras people too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 12 13:23:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 09:23:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191492] New: Review Request: unuran-0.7.2 Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191492 Summary: Review Request: unuran-0.7.2 Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: ndbecker2 at verizon.net QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://nbecker.dyndns.org:8080/unuran.spec SRPM URL: http://nbecker.dyndns.org:8080/unuran-0.7.2-1.src.rpm Description: Message-ID: <200605121324.k4CDObfT022601@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdiff3-0.9.88-1.src.rpm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191473 ------- Additional Comments From laurent.rineau__fc_extra at normalesup.org 2006-05-12 09:24 EST ------- Your %changelog is strange. The release number is already written after you email address. Proposed patch: *** /tmp/kdiff3.spec 2006-05-12 15:30:53.000000000 +0200 --- /tmp/kdiff3-0.9.88-3.spec 2006-05-12 15:30:53.000000000 +0200 *************** *** 95,102 **** --- 95,106 ---- %changelog * Fri May 12 2006 Neal Becker - 0.9.88-3 - Fix symlinks (from Rex Dieter) + - release 3 * Fri May 12 2006 Neal Becker - 0.9.88-2 + - release 2 + + * Fri May 12 2006 Neal Becker - 0.9.88-1 - Fix source0 - Fix E: kdiff3 standard-dir-owned-by-package /usr/share/icons E: kdiff3 standard-dir-owned-by-package /usr/share/man -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 12 13:38:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 09:38:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191473] Review Request: kdiff3-0.9.88-1.src.rpm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605121338.k4CDcuKO026470@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdiff3-0.9.88-1.src.rpm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191473 ------- Additional Comments From laurent.rineau__fc_extra at normalesup.org 2006-05-12 09:38 EST ------- (In reply to comment #7) > Symlink thing is fixed. Thanks Rex. > http://nbecker.dyndns.org:8080/kdiff3-0.9.88-3.src.rpm Whouah, fast fix! I notice some owned directories that should not be, IMHO: /usr/lib64/kde3 /usr/share/applications /usr/share/applnk /usr/share/applnk/Development /usr/share/apps /usr/share/services They are all owned by kdelibs, but /usr/share/applnk/Development. As a matter of fact, /usr/share/applnk/Development/ does not exists on my FC-5. :-\ Rex, you are more experienced than be, i think, can you confirm that kdiff3 should not owned these directories? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 12 13:45:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 09:45:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190664] Review Request: keyutils - Kernel key management userspace utilities In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605121345.k4CDjRVn028120@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: keyutils - Kernel key management userspace utilities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190664 ------- Additional Comments From dwmw2 at redhat.com 2006-05-12 09:45 EST ------- If the static library is dropped, this package should be fine. Ralf? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 12 13:49:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 09:49:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188445] Review Request: bootconf In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605121349.k4CDnWtV028969@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bootconf https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188445 ------- Additional Comments From mdehaan at redhat.com 2006-05-12 09:49 EST ------- I'm just trying to provide useful feedback here, so please take these comments as such. Yes, I understand it's *NOT* a multiple bootloader configuration tool, and I'm asking *why* it isn't. The kernel boot command line is owned by the bootloader, and you're configuring the bootloader -- so the question is relevant. Have you looked at grubby and booty? If not, please do. I ran the app, and yes, it allows configuration of just *three* kernel boot parameters. There are many more kernel boot options than this, why pick just these three? This seems to be of limited value, and I'm asking these questions to understand why the tools out there aren't already doing the job. If we want to provide human-understandable editing of these options for people who don't know what they do, well, aren't these people capable of editing grub.conf? For those that aren't, a full list of arguments would make a lot more sense -- and this should be integrated into something that is also capable of adding and removing kernels/initrds and general bootloader configuration. Only being able to edit 3 options doesn't seem useful to me. Maybe I'm not seeing something. But if such a tool were to be included, I would expect it should be able to include most *any* kernel option, and it should support multiple bootloaders because such support is already provided free via grubby and booty. This would include kickstart options, root options, and so forth. The code also is totally commentless, for what it's worth. I did not look much deeper than this because of the lack of comments, and that I am unable to run pychecker on it. >From README: """ bootconf will search and update every "kernel" line in grub.conf, setting the requested options. When reading the existing boot configuration, bootconf parses only the first kernel entry in grub.conf """ While the 3 arguments in question are fairly harmless, in general kernel parameter customization should affect a selected kernel or a selected list of kernels, not every kernel. From running the GUI, that intended behavior is not obvious. The app also just throws an IOError when invoked with an account that can't read /etc/grub.conf, versus allowing the user to authenticate or throwing up a more helpful warning message. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 12 13:54:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 09:54:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191494] New: Review Request: perl-Authen-DigestMD5 Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191494 Summary: Review Request: perl-Authen-DigestMD5 Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: paul at city-fan.org QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.city-fan.org/~paul/extras/perl-Authen-DigestMD5/perl-Authen-DigestMD5.spec SRPM URL: http://www.city-fan.org/~paul/extras/perl-Authen-DigestMD5/perl-Authen-DigestMD5-0.04-1.src.rpm Description: This module supports DIGEST-MD5 SASL authentication as defined in RFC-2831. It is an optional dependency of swaks (Bug #179237) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 12 13:57:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 09:57:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 179237] Review Request: swaks - A command-line SMTP transaction tester In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605121357.k4CDvTWZ030817@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: swaks - A command-line SMTP transaction tester https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=179237 paul at city-fan.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|gdk at redhat.com |paul at city-fan.org OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-05-12 09:57 EST ------- Review: - rpmlint clean - package and spec naming OK - package meets guidelines - license is GPL, matches spec - spec file written in English and is legible - source matches upstream - package builds OK on FC5 and in mock for rawhide (i386) - no explicit BR's needed nor present - no locales, libraries, sub-packages, or pkgconfigs to worry about - not relocatable - no directory ownership or permissions issues - no duplicate files - %clean section present and correct - macro usage is consistent - code not content - no large docs - docs don't affect runtime - no desktop file needed - package appears to work OK - no scriptlets Notes: NTLM Auth requires Authen::NTLM from the NTLM perl distribution, which does not (despite what the first sentence of the license terms says) appear to be free software and is hence unlikely to get packaged for Extras. Digest-MD5 Auth requires Authen::DigestMD5, which will be available in Extras shortly after someone approves Bug #191494 (hint ;-) ) Approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 12 14:01:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 10:01:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189755] Review Request: pypoker-eval - Python Interface to poker-eval In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605121401.k4CE1sn9031935@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pypoker-eval - Python Interface to poker-eval https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189755 ------- Additional Comments From tkmame at retrogames.com 2006-05-12 10:01 EST ------- I asked upstream about the library version number, and they mention that it is the first version of the ABI. When the ABI changes, the version number will be bumped, so I think a version number of 0.0.0 is okay. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 12 14:07:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 10:07:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189755] Review Request: pypoker-eval - Python Interface to poker-eval In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605121407.k4CE7CEk000446@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pypoker-eval - Python Interface to poker-eval https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189755 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-05-12 10:06 EST ------- I had no issues with the version number of the library. It is the unversioned .so file that must move to the -devel package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 12 14:13:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 10:13:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191473] Review Request: kdiff3-0.9.88-1.src.rpm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605121413.k4CEDr5M001920@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdiff3-0.9.88-1.src.rpm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191473 ------- Additional Comments From laurent.rineau__fc_extra at normalesup.org 2006-05-12 10:13 EST ------- Yet another comment: you should see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/ScriptletSnippets#head-fc74f078205565f961f6d836b77c3428619c689d -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 12 14:15:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 10:15:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191473] Review Request: kdiff3-0.9.88-1.src.rpm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605121415.k4CEFCNL002284@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdiff3-0.9.88-1.src.rpm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191473 ------- Additional Comments From dennis at ausil.us 2006-05-12 10:15 EST ------- indead the files section is wrong you need to own the files inside those directories. additionally you need to use desktop-file-utils to install your .desktop files the /usr/share/applnk tree should not exist once you install the .desktop file you also need a %post and %postun section to deal with the icons and to run ldconfig something like %post /sbin/ldconfig touch --no-create %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor || : %postun /sbin/ldconfig touch --no-create %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor || : -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 12 14:16:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 10:16:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189755] Review Request: pypoker-eval - Python Interface to poker-eval In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605121416.k4CEGhJB002564@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pypoker-eval - Python Interface to poker-eval https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189755 ------- Additional Comments From tkmame at retrogames.com 2006-05-12 10:16 EST ------- yea duh, I'm stupid, I misread the report. Okay, I've fixed up the spec file accordingly, but rpmlint now gives this warning: W: pypoker-eval-devel dangling-relative-symlink /usr/lib64/python2.4/site-packages/pypokereval.so pypokereval.so.0.0.0 New files can be found at: Spec URL: http://tkmame.retrogames.com/fedora-extras/pypoker-eval.spec SRPM URL: http://tkmame.retrogames.com/fedora-extras/pypoker-eval-131.0-3.src.rpm ** NOTE ** You may have to download the srpm from http://tkmame.retrogames.com/fedora-extras/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 12 14:30:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 10:30:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191473] Review Request: kdiff3: Compare + merge 2 or 3 files or directories In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605121430.k4CEUlt2005962@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdiff3: Compare + merge 2 or 3 files or directories https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191473 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: kdiff3- |Review Request: kdiff3: |0.9.88-1.src.rpm |Compare + merge 2 or 3 files | |or directories ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-05-12 10:30 EST ------- kdiff doesn't appear to include any shared libs, so /sbin/ldconfig isn't necessary in %%post/%%postun. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 12 14:38:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 10:38:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191473] Review Request: kdiff3: Compare + merge 2 or 3 files or directories In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605121438.k4CEc3Ct008700@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdiff3: Compare + merge 2 or 3 files or directories https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191473 ------- Additional Comments From laurent.rineau__fc_extra at normalesup.org 2006-05-12 10:38 EST ------- What about %{_libdir}/kde3/libkdiff3part.so?? About the GTK+ icon cache, kdiff3 will be shown in Gnome menus. %post and %postun should call gtk-update-icon-cache, no? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 12 15:01:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 11:01:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191473] Review Request: kdiff3: Compare + merge 2 or 3 files or directories In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605121501.k4CF1jFR015744@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdiff3: Compare + merge 2 or 3 files or directories https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191473 ------- Additional Comments From ndbecker2 at verizon.net 2006-05-12 11:01 EST ------- Fixed /usr/share/applnk Added %post, %postun http://nbecker.dyndns.org:8080/kdiff3-0.9.88-4.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 12 15:02:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 11:02:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189755] Review Request: pypoker-eval - Python Interface to poker-eval In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605121502.k4CF2edh016010@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pypoker-eval - Python Interface to poker-eval https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189755 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-05-12 11:02 EST ------- rpmlint seems to be smart enough to not warn about dangling symlinks for .so files in %{_libdir}, but within Python's directory I guess it doesn't know what to do. Anyway, the new package builds fine and ignoring the rpmlint false positive everything is clean. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 12 15:03:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 11:03:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191473] Review Request: kdiff3: Compare + merge 2 or 3 files or directories In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605121503.k4CF3LgO016254@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdiff3: Compare + merge 2 or 3 files or directories https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191473 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-05-12 11:03 EST ------- libkdiff3part is a runtime loadable KPart, not a shared library (ie, it's not in %{_libdir}) Re: GTK+ icon cache: probably, though some would argue that kde apps shouldn't have to mess with gtk-only crud like this. (: See bug #170335 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 12 15:09:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 11:09:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 178900] Review Request: monodoc In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605121509.k4CF9UjW017857@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: monodoc https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=178900 bdpepple at ameritech.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|caillon at redhat.com |bdpepple at ameritech.net OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at ameritech.net 2006-05-12 11:09 EST ------- MD5Sums: b5366181170e473c918537af145adafb monodoc-1.1.13.tar.gz Good: * Upstream source tarball verified * Package name conforms to the Fedora Naming Guidelines * Group Tag is from the official list * Buildroot has all required elements * All paths begin with macros * Builds fine in Mock Bad: * COPYING file should be added to %doc. * Inconsistent use of ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT} & %{buildroot}. * Ownership problems with some of the directories. In general, you don't want to use wildcards to pull in children directories. * Unnecessary scriptlet for shared libraries, which this package doesn't have. Minor: * rpmlint errors: E: monodoc no-binary E: monodoc only-non-binary-in-usr-lib W: monodoc no-documentation W: monodoc devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/pkgconfig/monodoc.pc W: monodoc one-line-command-in-%postun /sbin/ldconfig Most of these can be ignored since this is a mono package, and the ones that should be addressed are mention in the Bad section of this review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 12 15:16:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 11:16:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191473] Review Request: kdiff3: Compare + merge 2 or 3 files or directories In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605121516.k4CFGFoE019618@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdiff3: Compare + merge 2 or 3 files or directories https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191473 ------- Additional Comments From dennis at ausil.us 2006-05-12 11:16 EST ------- the package still owns directories it shouldn't Please post a link to a spec file also -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 12 15:17:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 11:17:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191473] Review Request: kdiff3: Compare + merge 2 or 3 files or directories In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605121517.k4CFHVQq019903@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdiff3: Compare + merge 2 or 3 files or directories https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191473 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-05-12 11:17 EST ------- specfile link is in the initial comment. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 12 15:35:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 11:35:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 184530] Review Request: perl-RPM2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605121535.k4CFZCvs024946@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-RPM2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=184530 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|fedora-extras- |fedora-package- |list at redhat.com |review at redhat.com cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |cweyl at alumni.drew.edu ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-05-12 11:35 EST ------- Looks like Packaging/ReviewGuidelines has been updated to deal with this: - MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 12 15:43:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 11:43:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191473] Review Request: kdiff3: Compare + merge 2 or 3 files or directories In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605121543.k4CFhwdH028622@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdiff3: Compare + merge 2 or 3 files or directories https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191473 ------- Additional Comments From dennis at ausil.us 2006-05-12 11:43 EST ------- dsirectories you shouldn't own are /usr/share/apps /usr/lib64/kde3 /usr/share/services there is also no need to rm the applnk dir as rpm will not include it when it is empty. which happens when you install the .desktop file you also do not need to requires or buildrequires kdelibs kdelibs-devel kdebase and kdebase-devel pull them in -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 12 15:47:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 11:47:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 184530] Review Request: perl-RPM2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605121547.k4CFlHZ5029642@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-RPM2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=184530 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-05-12 11:47 EST ------- (In reply to comment #7) > Looks like Packaging/ReviewGuidelines has been updated to deal with this: > > - MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any > that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines; inclusion of > those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. Yes, that's OK, which just leaves the license issue to be resolved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 12 15:53:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 11:53:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191473] Review Request: kdiff3: Compare + merge 2 or 3 files or directories In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605121553.k4CFrbh8031243@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdiff3: Compare + merge 2 or 3 files or directories https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191473 ------- Additional Comments From laurent.rineau__fc_extra at normalesup.org 2006-05-12 11:53 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=128943) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=128943&action=view) Patched spec file for kdiff3-0.9.88-5 I attach a patched spec file. I have corrected several items: - no % in %changelog: use %% instead, - fixed the %files section, - removed the Requires: tag -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 12 16:02:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 12:02:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191110] Review Request: perl-Devel-Cover - Code coverage metrics for Perl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605121602.k4CG2IcI001018@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Devel-Cover - Code coverage metrics for Perl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191110 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-05-12 12:02 EST ------- The new package builds fine and the permissions problem is fixed. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 12 16:03:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 12:03:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191507] New: Review Request: wifi-radar Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191507 Summary: Review Request: wifi-radar Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: i.pilcher at comcast.net QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://home.comcast.net/~i.pilcher/wifi-radar.spec SRPM URL: http://home.comcast.net/~i.pilcher/wifi-radar-1.9.6-1.src.rpm Description: A straightforward utility for managing wireless connections -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 12 16:05:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 12:05:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191494] Review Request: perl-Authen-DigestMD5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605121605.k4CG53pW001839@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Authen-DigestMD5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191494 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |tibbs at math.uh.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 12 16:13:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 12:13:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191509] New: Review Request: perl-Test-Portability-Files Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191509 Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-Portability-Files Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: steve at silug.org QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://ftp.kspei.com/pub/steve/rpms/perl-Test-Portability-Files/perl-Test-Portability-Files.spec SRPM URL: http://ftp.kspei.com/pub/steve/rpms/perl-Test-Portability-Files-0.05-1.src.rpm Description: This module is used to check the portability across operating systems of the names of the files present in the distribution of a module. The tests use the advices given in "Files and Filesystems" in perlport. The author of a distribution can select which tests to execute. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 12 16:28:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 12:28:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 184530] Review Request: perl-RPM2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605121628.k4CGSdnx007006@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-RPM2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=184530 ------- Additional Comments From jpo at di.uminho.pt 2006-05-12 12:28 EST ------- A couple of moths ago I opened two tickets in rt.cpan in order to ask Chip Turner to add license information to RPM2 and Rpm::Specfile. No answer until now. IIRC in the past Warren was able to contact Chip. Maybe we should ping him. By the way, isn't RPM2 included in the new versions of RPM? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 12 16:42:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 12:42:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 184530] Review Request: perl-RPM2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605121642.k4CGgcn4010894@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-RPM2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=184530 ------- Additional Comments From jpo at di.uminho.pt 2006-05-12 12:42 EST ------- I found the following perl related lines in the CHANGES file of RPM 4.4.6 -------- 4.4.5 -> 4.4.6: ... - perl: fix exuberant cut-n-paste. ... 4.4.4 -> 4.4.5: ... - fix: perldeps and prov.pl not to emit perl(main) (#177960) ... 4.4.3 -> 4.4.4: ... - perl: diddle Makefile.PL to build/link within rpm source tree. - perl: add build dependency on perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker) >= 6.17. - complete forking perl-RPM2/* to perl/* module name "RPM". - perl: install in vendor dir. ... 4.4.2 -> 4.4.3: ... - fix: revert to older/slower perldeps avoid getOutputFrom() error. - perl: handle the 'v' in "use v5.6.0" (#140597). - add run-time perl(...) provides name space dependency set. - resurrect a rpm-perl subpackage from perl-RPM2-0.66. ... ---------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 12 16:46:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 12:46:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191218] Review Request: PyScript - Postscript graphics with Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605121646.k4CGkF2v012072@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PyScript - Postscript graphics with Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191218 ------- Additional Comments From tjikkun at xs4all.nl 2006-05-12 12:46 EST ------- Ok, I had a little bit more time now, sorry for not giving all directions at once but i am also still learning. (In reply to comment #4) A couple of things: 1) %prep section: make it: %setup -q I don't know if this is a must, but I think it becomes easier if you do this. First of all you have one line in %prep instead of 3, second you can remove a lot of %{name}-%{version} so the specfile becomes easier to read 2) I read http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Python , you should do that too. I hinted to replace paths with libdir but in this page you can read about %{python_sitelib}, use this instead. 3) use wildcards in the %files section, instead of listing all files seperatly (see the url in 2 for an example) 4) python setup.py install --prefix=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT/usr still has /usr hardcoded 5) time is up again for me, just a general hint that you can find a lot of info in the fedora extras wiki. 6) don't take everything i say for granted, i could be wrong sometimes so if you think i might be just say so. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 12 16:51:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 12:51:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191516] New: Review Request: perl-Pod-Readme Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191516 Summary: Review Request: perl-Pod-Readme Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: steve at silug.org QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://ftp.kspei.com/pub/steve/rpms/perl-Pod-Readme/perl-Pod-Readme.spec SRPM URL: http://ftp.kspei.com/pub/steve/rpms/perl-Pod-Readme-0.081-1.src.rpm Description: This module is a subclass of Pod::PlainText which provides additional POD markup for generating README files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 12 16:52:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 12:52:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191516] Review Request: perl-Pod-Readme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605121652.k4CGqL5s013664@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Pod-Readme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191516 steve at silug.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |191509 ------- Additional Comments From steve at silug.org 2006-05-12 12:52 EST ------- This is a requirement of the latest Module::Build. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 12 16:52:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 12:52:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191509] Review Request: perl-Test-Portability-Files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605121652.k4CGqW10013715@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-Portability-Files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191509 steve at silug.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |191516 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 12 16:54:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 12:54:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191494] Review Request: perl-Authen-DigestMD5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605121654.k4CGslAN014195@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Authen-DigestMD5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191494 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-05-12 12:54 EST ------- Not much to say. BTW, once this gets in I'll update swaks to require it. * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written, uses macros consistently and follows the Perl specfile template. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. It's not included separately in the package, but this is not necessary as the upstream tarball does not include it. * source files match upstream: f96d3ccc55c4bf551baf59fd8cb51421 Authen-DigestMD5-0.04.tar.gz f96d3ccc55c4bf551baf59fd8cb51421 Authen-DigestMD5-0.04.tar.gz-srpm * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane. * no shared libraries are present. * package is not relocatable. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * %clean is present. * %check is present and all tests pass (well, the single test passes): All tests successful. Files=1, Tests=1, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.02 cusr + 0.01 csys = 0.03 CPU) * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no libtool .la droppings. * not a GUI app. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 12 16:57:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 12:57:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191473] Review Request: kdiff3: Compare + merge 2 or 3 files or directories In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605121657.k4CGvPvb014989@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdiff3: Compare + merge 2 or 3 files or directories https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191473 ------- Additional Comments From ndbecker2 at verizon.net 2006-05-12 12:57 EST ------- patch merged rm applnk rm'd buildrequires fixed http://nbecker.dyndns.org:8080/kdiff3-0.9.88-5.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 12 17:04:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 13:04:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188180] Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605121704.k4CH4cQM016368@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188180 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-05-12 13:04 EST ------- Spec Name or Url: http://kde-redhat.unl.edu/apt/kde-redhat/SPECS/qt4-4.1.2-8.spec SRPM Name or Url: http://kde-redhat.unl.edu/apt/kde-redhat/all/SRPMS.stable/qt4-4.1.2-8.src.rpm %changelog * Fri May 12 2006 Rex Dieter 4.1.2-8 - simplify build* macros - lower-case all subpkgs (ie, -MySQL -> -mysql ) - drop BR: perl, sed * Thu May 11 2006 Rex Dieter 4.1.2-7 - rework %%post/%%postun, mostly to placate rpmlint - drop Prefix: - drop use of qt4.(sh|csh), they're empty atm anyway - use Source'd designer.desktop (instead of inline cat/echo) - symlinks to %%_bindir: qmake4, designer4, qtconfig4 - drop qtrc, qt4 doesn't use it. - -docs subpkg for API html docs, demos, examples. - BR: libXcursor-devel libXi-devel (fc5+) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 12 17:15:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 13:15:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191239] Review Request: qjackctl - Qt based JACK control application In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605121715.k4CHFWH7019081@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qjackctl - Qt based JACK control application https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191239 ------- Additional Comments From nando at ccrma.stanford.edu 2006-05-12 13:15 EST ------- > Package does not follow Fedora's package naming guildlines > (wiki: PackageNamingGuidelines) > release should be 1, 2, 3, not 2.0 Fixed (I was trying to not needlessly increment the release during the review process when packages have not yet been released). > BuildRequires: desktop-file-utils is missing Fixed, my mach based build environment already includes it by default and that's why I did not notice it missing. > %define desktop_vendor planetccrma > desktop_vendor is fedora :) > add to desktop-file-install: --add-category X-Fedora Added. > # distros with 2.4.x kernels should use jackstart as the default > %{?fc1:%define usejackstart 1} > %{?rh9:%define usejackstart 1} > this define can go since extras doesn't go that far back I erased this but I was hoping I would not have to keep separate spec files for Planet CCRMA and Fedora Extras (it does not really hurt to have it there). Oh well, just a little bit more extra pain I guess... > just use rm istead of %__rm macro Fixed. Is this a general policy (ie: don't even think of using macros for commands) or personal preference? Spec URL: http://ccrma.stanford.edu/planetccrma/extras/qjackctl.spec SRPM URL: http://ccrma.stanford.edu/planetccrma/extras/qjackctl-0.2.20-3.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 12 17:20:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 13:20:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190189] Review Request: PyQt4: Python bindings for Qt4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605121720.k4CHKFsr019983@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PyQt4: Python bindings for Qt4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190189 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-05-12 13:20 EST ------- Spec URL: http://kde-redhat.unl.edu/apt/kde-redhat/SPECS/PyQt4-4.0-0.6.beta1.spec SRPM URL: http://kde-redhat.unl.edu/apt/kde-redhat/all/SRPMS.stable/PyQt4-4.0-0.6.beta1.src.rpm %changelog * Fri May 12 2006 Rex Dieter 4.0-0.6.beta1 - drop BR: qt4-MySQL qt4-ODBC qt4-PostgreSQL - drop usage of (undefined) %%sip_min -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 12 17:25:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 13:25:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191509] Review Request: perl-Test-Portability-Files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605121725.k4CHPWr6020974@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-Portability-Files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191509 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |tibbs at math.uh.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 12 17:28:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 13:28:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191239] Review Request: qjackctl - Qt based JACK control application In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605121728.k4CHSqL2021840@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qjackctl - Qt based JACK control application https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191239 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-05-12 13:28 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > > just use rm istead of %__rm macro > > Fixed. Is this a general policy (ie: don't even think of using macros for > commands) or personal preference? It's personal preference. I personally consider this change to be a regression since "%__rm" expends to a fully-qualified pathname, unlike plain "rm". Hence the rpm build may now behave differently depending on the setting of the builder's PATH variable (they might have a wrapper script for rm earlier in their PATH for example, which always asked for confirmation of any deletes), which is not a good thing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 12 17:37:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 13:37:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191494] Review Request: perl-Authen-DigestMD5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605121737.k4CHbX4j024178@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Authen-DigestMD5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191494 paul at city-fan.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-05-12 13:37 EST ------- Thanks for the review. Imported into CVS, owners.list updated, and built successfully for FC-4, FC-5, and development (yes, already!). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 12 17:38:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 13:38:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190367] Review Request: PyKDE: Python bindings for KDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605121738.k4CHcKCS024351@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PyKDE: Python bindings for KDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190367 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-05-12 13:38 EST ------- Spec URL: http://kde-redhat.unl.edu/apt/kde-redhat/SPECS/PyKDE-3.15.2-0.4.20060422.spec SRPM URL: http://kde-redhat.unl.edu/apt/kde-redhat/all/SRPMS.stable/PyKDE-3.15.2-0.4.20060422.src.rpm %changelog * Fri May 12 2006 Rex Dieter 3.15.2-0.3.20060422 - drop sip-abi crud, rely (only) on Requires: PyQt -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 12 17:38:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 13:38:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191239] Review Request: qjackctl - Qt based JACK control application In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605121738.k4CHcotX024504@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qjackctl - Qt based JACK control application https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191239 ------- Additional Comments From green at redhat.com 2006-05-12 13:38 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > It's personal preference. I personally consider this change to be a regression > since "%__rm" expends to a fully-qualified pathname, unlike plain "rm". What about %{__make}? I've been asked to change that to "make" in some reviews. Fernando - I think people also like to see: Source0: http://dl.sourceforge.net/qjackctl/qjackctl-0.2.20.tar.gz instead of Source0: http://dl.sourceforge.net/%{name}/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz since it is directly wget'able, although I don't know if it's official policy or not. AG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 12 17:46:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 13:46:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191239] Review Request: qjackctl - Qt based JACK control application In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605121746.k4CHkRVR025812@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qjackctl - Qt based JACK control application https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191239 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-05-12 13:46 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > (In reply to comment #3) > > It's personal preference. I personally consider this change to be a regression > > since "%__rm" expends to a fully-qualified pathname, unlike plain "rm". > > What about %{__make}? I've been asked to change that to "make" in some reviews. My personal preference is to use the macros where they are available, and fully-qualified pathnames otherwise, for all commands used in the build process. > Fernando - I think people also like to see: > Source0: http://dl.sourceforge.net/qjackctl/qjackctl-0.2.20.tar.gz > instead of > Source0: http://dl.sourceforge.net/%{name}/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz > since it is directly wget'able, although I don't know if it's > official policy or not. My preference is: Source0: http://dl.sf.net/qjackctl/qjackctl-%{version}.tar.gz Reasons: * dl.sf.net is a shorter URL :-) * using the package name explicitly rather than just %{name} is a little more readable, and the package name is hardly likely to change very often * the version number is likely to change, so using the %{version} macro helps maintainability of the package * whilst the use of the %{version} macro prevents wget from working directly, you can use spectool from the fedora-rpmdevtools package to retrieve the source for you - it will automatically expand the macro -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 12 17:50:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 13:50:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191509] Review Request: perl-Test-Portability-Files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605121750.k4CHoJxa026567@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-Portability-Files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191509 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-05-12 13:50 EST ------- A mock build on x86_64 development failed; it seems perl-Module-Build needs perl(YAML) < 0.49, but 0.58 is in the repo. Oops. An FC5 build works. * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. Licence texts are included in the package. * source files match upstream: 2ede77af4d3b82ffb39cd28fda6857e5 Test-Portability-Files-0.05.tar.gz 2ede77af4d3b82ffb39cd28fda6857e5 Test-Portability-Files-0.05.tar.gz-srpm * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * package builds in mock (fc5, x86_64). * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane. * no shared libraries are present. * package is not relocatable. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * %clean is present. * %check is present and all tests pass: All tests successful, 2 tests skipped. Files=5, Tests=5, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.17 cusr + 0.06 csys = 0.23 CPU) * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no libtool .la droppings. * not a GUI app. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 12 17:53:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 13:53:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191516] Review Request: perl-Pod-Readme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605121753.k4CHrp15027579@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Pod-Readme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191516 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |tibbs at math.uh.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 12 17:58:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 13:58:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191492] Review Request: unuran-0.7.2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605121758.k4CHwtXq028874@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: unuran-0.7.2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191492 ------- Additional Comments From ndbecker2 at verizon.net 2006-05-12 13:58 EST ------- Updated to http://nbecker.dyndns.org:8080/unuran-0.7.2-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 12 18:03:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 14:03:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189755] Review Request: pypoker-eval - Python Interface to poker-eval In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605121803.k4CI34Yr029634@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pypoker-eval - Python Interface to poker-eval https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189755 tkmame at retrogames.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 12 18:06:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 14:06:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191110] Review Request: perl-Devel-Cover - Code coverage metrics for Perl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605121806.k4CI6mUi030465@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Devel-Cover - Code coverage metrics for Perl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191110 jpo at di.uminho.pt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From jpo at di.uminho.pt 2006-05-12 14:06 EST ------- Thanks for the review. Imported and built for FC-5 and devel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 12 18:12:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 14:12:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189197] Review Request: gtk2hs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605121812.k4CIC3bR032050@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtk2hs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189197 gemi at bluewin.ch changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From gemi at bluewin.ch 2006-05-12 14:11 EST ------- Seems to work well. I could not install the mozembed package due to a new version of mozilla-devel. Don't forget to update this. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 12 18:14:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 14:14:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191473] Review Request: kdiff3: Compare + merge 2 or 3 files or directories In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605121814.k4CIEnUZ000514@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdiff3: Compare + merge 2 or 3 files or directories https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191473 ------- Additional Comments From laurent.rineau__fc_extra at normalesup.org 2006-05-12 14:14 EST ------- Well, this package would need now a formal review. Neal, in the next release, feel free to remove my name/email from the spec file. You can merge the two item 0.9.88-5 in %changelog. My editor (GNU/Emacs) automatically create the changelog entry. I cannot find you in the owners.list. Perhaps do you need sponsorship, too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 12 18:22:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 14:22:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187843] Review Request: phpMyAdmin - Web based MySQL browser written in php In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605121822.k4CIM1Mv002535@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: phpMyAdmin - Web based MySQL browser written in php https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187843 rmo at sunnmore.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rmo at sunnmore.net ------- Additional Comments From rmo at sunnmore.net 2006-05-12 14:21 EST ------- Seems like phpmyadmin has been updated: http://www.phpmyadmin.net/home_page/downloads.php?relnotes=0 Like Michael A. Peters suggested, maybe require webserver instead of httpd. And even though a couple of php-modules is a requirement, php should be a requirement too. I've tested the package on a FC5-host with mysql 5.0.18, seems to work very well. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 12 18:27:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 14:27:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191434] Review Request: xarchon - Arcade board game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605121827.k4CIRoWV004504@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xarchon - Arcade board game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191434 wart at kobold.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |wart at kobold.org OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2006-05-12 14:27 EST ------- MUST ==== * rpmlint output clean * Sources match upstream 491dea5b4e61ed13cd988d1c184a8ef0 xarchon-0.50.tar.gz * GPL license ok, license file included * Package and spec file named appropriately * .desktop file installed correctly * RPM_BUILD_ROOT cleaned appropriately * spec file is legible and in Am. English * No locales * No shared libs * No -devel subpackage needed * No -docs subpackage needed * Not relocatable * Owns all directories that it creates * Builds fine in mock on FC-4-i386 MUSTFIX ======= * Macro use isn't consistent. 'xarchon' is used in some places, while %{name} is used in others. SHOULD ====== * Don't bother including the NEWS file, it just tells the user to read the ChangeLog file. * Missing BR: libXpm-devel on FC-5. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 12 18:29:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 14:29:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191523] New: Review Request: perl-XML-Stream Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191523 Summary: Review Request: perl-XML-Stream Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-XML-Stream.spec SRPM URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-XML-Stream-1.22-1.fc5.src.rpm Description: This module provides the user with methods to connect to a remote server, send a stream of XML to the server, and receive/parse an XML stream from the server. It is primarily based work for the Etherx XML router developed by the Jabber Development Team. For more information about this project visit http://etherx.jabber.org/stream/. XML::Stream gives the user the ability to define a central callback that will be used to handle the tags received from the server. These tags are passed in the format defined at instantiation time. the closing tag of an object is seen, the tree is finished and passed to the call back function. What the user does with it from there is up to them. For a detailed description of how this module works, and about the data structure that it returns, please view the source of Stream.pm and look at the detailed description at the end of the file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 12 18:32:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 14:32:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188180] Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605121832.k4CIWZX1006200@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188180 ------- Additional Comments From laurent.rineau__fc_extra at normalesup.org 2006-05-12 14:32 EST ------- sed: can't read config.tests/unix/checkavail: No such file or directory I'll remove this sed line and continue the build... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 12 18:34:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 14:34:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188180] Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605121834.k4CIYXDF007141@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188180 ------- Additional Comments From laurent.rineau__fc_extra at normalesup.org 2006-05-12 14:34 EST ------- Another odd thing: I cannot compile this spec (and the previous ones actually) without using option --define 'fedora 5' for rpmbuild. Where should this macro come from? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 12 18:37:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 14:37:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188180] Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605121837.k4CIbdSL008119@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188180 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-05-12 14:37 EST ------- Re: sed Oops. (Wonder how my builds completed then?) Re: fedora macro The Extras buildsystem defines the fedora macro. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 12 18:40:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 14:40:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188180] Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605121840.k4CIeLhT009110@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188180 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-05-12 14:40 EST ------- Spec Name or Url: http://kde-redhat.unl.edu/apt/kde-redhat/SPECS/qt4-4.1.2-9.spec SRPM Name or Url: http://kde-redhat.unl.edu/apt/kde-redhat/all/SRPMS.stable/qt4-4.1.2-9.src.rpm %changelog * Fri May 12 2006 Rex Dieter 4.1.2-9 - drop reference to non-existent config.test/unix/checkavail -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 12 18:48:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 14:48:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191239] Review Request: qjackctl - Qt based JACK control application In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605121848.k4CImr09012154@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qjackctl - Qt based JACK control application https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191239 ------- Additional Comments From nando at ccrma.stanford.edu 2006-05-12 14:48 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > (In reply to comment #4) > > (In reply to comment #3) > > > It's personal preference. I personally consider this change to be a regression > > > since "%__rm" expends to a fully-qualified pathname, unlike plain "rm". > > > > What about %{__make}? I've been asked to change that to "make" in some reviews. > > My personal preference is to use the macros where they are available, and > fully-qualified pathnames otherwise, for all commands used in the build process. I agree and that's why I use, when possible, built-in macros. [I thought it was policy.] I'm sure this has been discussed to death here before :-) My take on this: if the results of running a build script depend on overriding a basic core unix command by the script builder then I'd label that a bug in the build script. While your example for rm sounds reasonable, it is not in the context of executing a build script which, I think, cannot/should not be interactive. Using the macro would actually expose (IMHO) a bug. I'm sure other more applicable examples could be put forward, of course... What I don't see is why %{__rm} should be different from any other unix command. It is just a unix command... (I would prefer to keep using macros when possible. I understand this is probably not so important these days, all builds are done in chroot environments where they are completely isolated.) > > Fernando - I think people also like to see: > My preference is: > Source0: http://dl.sf.net/qjackctl/qjackctl-%{version}.tar.gz Sounds good to me, I agree the version number should not be hardwired, otherwise what's the use of macros? :-) I'll wait a bit before releasing another version in case there are more changes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 12 18:56:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 14:56:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 185262] Review Request: kchmviewer - CHM viewer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605121856.k4CIu6wg014487@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kchmviewer - CHM viewer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=185262 jpo at di.uminho.pt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |NEW Keywords| |Reopened Resolution|NEXTRELEASE | ------- Additional Comments From jpo at di.uminho.pt 2006-05-12 14:56 EST ------- Re-opening this until Patrice can: * look at comment #6 * build the package for FC-4 and FC-5 (branches already created) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 12 19:08:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 15:08:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 185325] Review Request: sparse In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605121908.k4CJ8eKI018004@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sparse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=185325 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|fedora-extras- |fedora-package- |list at redhat.com |review at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 12 19:13:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 15:13:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191509] Review Request: perl-Test-Portability-Files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605121913.k4CJDBDl019258@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-Portability-Files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191509 ------- Additional Comments From steve at silug.org 2006-05-12 15:13 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > A mock build on x86_64 development failed; it seems perl-Module-Build needs > perl(YAML) < 0.49, but 0.58 is in the repo. Yeah, that's what I'm trying to fix. I hadn't noticed that the new Module::Build needed extra modules. Oops. Thanks for the quick review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 12 19:27:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 15:27:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191534] New: Review Request: pygobject Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191534 Summary: Review Request: pygobject Product: Fedora Core Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: notting at redhat.com ReportedBy: johnp at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/johnp/files/pygobject/pygobject2.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/johnp/files/pygobject/pygobject2-2.10.1-1.src.rpm Description: pygobject2 is a split of the pygtk2 package. New versions of pygtk2 need pygobject2 to build. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 12 19:29:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 15:29:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191534] Review Request: pygobject2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605121929.k4CJTv9Z024398@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pygobject2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191534 johnp at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: pygobject |Review Request: pygobject2 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 12 19:33:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 15:33:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191538] New: Review Request: qsynth - Qt based Fluidsynth GUI front end Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191538 Summary: Review Request: qsynth - Qt based Fluidsynth GUI front end Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: nando at ccrma.stanford.edu QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://ccrma.stanford.edu/planetccrma/extras/qsynth.spec SRPM URL: http://ccrma.stanford.edu/planetccrma/extras/qsynth-0.2.5-2.src.rpm Description: QSynth is a fluidsynth GUI front-end application written in C++ around the Qt3 toolkit using Qt Designer. Eventually it may evolve into a softsynth management application allowing the user to control and manage a variety of command line softsynth but for the moment it wraps the excellent FluidSynth. FluidSynth is a command line software synthesiser based on the Soundfont specification. An excellent GUI wrapper for the fluidsynth software synth. Requires fluidsynth and indirectly jack-audio-connection-kit, both of which are still waiting for approval. See: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189886 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183912 [second package submission, I think I still need a sponsor] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 12 19:34:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 15:34:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191516] Review Request: perl-Pod-Readme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605121934.k4CJYp9t026183@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Pod-Readme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191516 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-05-12 15:34 EST ------- Same problem here with perl(YAML) requirement in the devel repo. Testing with FC5 instead. * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. Text is not included separately in the package, but this is not necessary as the upstream tarball does not include it. * source files match upstream: ea05b9a09ad65fbbc1864ef3b2396e64 Pod-Readme-0.081.tar.gz ea05b9a09ad65fbbc1864ef3b2396e64 Pod-Readme-0.081.tar.gz-srpm * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * package builds in mock (FC5, x86_64) with perl-Test-Portability-Files added. * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane. * no shared libraries are present. * package is not relocatable. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * %clean is present. * %check is present and all tests pass: All tests successful. Files=4, Tests=165, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.22 cusr + 0.08 csys = 0.30 CPU) * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no libtool .la droppings. * not a GUI app. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 12 19:35:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 15:35:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191540] New: Review Request: perl-Net-XMPP Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191540 Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-XMPP Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://home.comcast.net/~cweyl/perl-Net-XMPP.spec SRPM URL: http://home.comcast.net/~cweyl/perl-Net-XMPP-1.0-1.fc5.src.rpm Description: Net::XMPP provides a Perl user with access to the Extensible Messaging and Presence Protocol (XMPP). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 12 19:36:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 15:36:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191540] Review Request: perl-Net-XMPP In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605121936.k4CJajxZ026791@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-XMPP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191540 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |191523 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 12 19:37:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 15:37:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191523] Review Request: perl-XML-Stream In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605121937.k4CJb7CE026870@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-XML-Stream https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191523 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |191540 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 12 19:38:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 15:38:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191540] Review Request: perl-Net-XMPP In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605121938.k4CJcRhM027295@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-XMPP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191540 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |tibbs at math.uh.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 12 19:44:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 15:44:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191540] Review Request: perl-Net-XMPP In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605121944.k4CJiMLb029268@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-XMPP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191540 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-05-12 15:44 EST ------- Umm, neither of those URLs seems to be valid. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 12 19:45:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 15:45:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191540] Review Request: perl-Net-XMPP In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605121945.k4CJjCju029817@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-XMPP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191540 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-05-12 15:45 EST ------- Ah, it should be ~ckweyl; I'll proceed with the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 12 19:47:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 15:47:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191545] New: Review Request: perl-Net-Jabber Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191545 Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-Jabber Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-Net-Jabber.spec SRPM URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-Net-Jabber-2.0-1.fc5.src.rpm Description: Net::Jabber provides a Perl user with access to the Jabber Instant Messaging protocol. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 12 19:48:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 15:48:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191545] Review Request: perl-Net-Jabber In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605121948.k4CJmvRG030894@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-Jabber https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191545 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |191540 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 12 19:49:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 15:49:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191540] Review Request: perl-Net-XMPP In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605121949.k4CJnA4m030951@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-XMPP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191540 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |191545 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 12 19:54:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 15:54:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191305] Review Request: crossfire-client-images - Images for the crossfire client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605121954.k4CJsWfc000370@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: crossfire-client-images - Images for the crossfire client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191305 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 12 19:55:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 15:55:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191305] Review Request: crossfire-client-images - Images for the crossfire client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605121955.k4CJtuWS001018@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: crossfire-client-images - Images for the crossfire client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191305 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |chris.stone at gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 12 19:56:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 15:56:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191304] Review Request: crossfire-client - Client programs for the crossfire game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605121956.k4CJupKU001239@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: crossfire-client - Client programs for the crossfire game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191304 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |chris.stone at gmail.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 12 19:58:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 15:58:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191303] Review Request: crossfire - 2D multiplayer rpg game server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605121958.k4CJw9G1001720@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: crossfire - 2D multiplayer rpg game server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191303 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |chris.stone at gmail.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 12 19:59:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 15:59:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189088] Review Request: knemo Network monitor applet. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605121959.k4CJxqEG002473@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: knemo Network monitor applet. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189088 fedora.wickert at arcor.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 12 20:03:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 16:03:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 179040] Review Request: socat In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605122003.k4CK37Sn003585@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: socat https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=179040 ------- Additional Comments From paul at xtdnet.nl 2006-05-12 16:03 EST ------- Can someone give me a complete log of the build failure mentioned in #4. As I said, on my X86_64 FC4, it just builds. I'll contact upstream to ask for inclusion of configure.in/configure/ac -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 12 20:07:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 16:07:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191540] Review Request: perl-Net-XMPP In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605122007.k4CK7Lw4004562@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-XMPP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191540 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-05-12 16:07 EST ------- The summary is a bit content-free, but I can't suggest a better one that fits in 80 columns. The license of this package would seem to be LGPL, according to the XMPP.pm file and the presense of LICENSE.LGPL. Fails to build due to a lack of XML::Stream. Please submit your packages in dependency order if at all possible. * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written, uses macros consistently and follows the Perl specfile template. X license field matches the actual license. X license is open source-compatible; license text is included upstream but is not packaged. * source files match upstream: 6338484aa0d394e68c01666ca34e5241 Net-XMPP-1.0.tar.gz 6338484aa0d394e68c01666ca34e5241 Net-XMPP-1.0.tar.gz-srpm * latest version is being packaged. Can't proceed further with the review due to dependency issues. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 12 20:14:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 16:14:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191545] Review Request: perl-Net-Jabber In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605122014.k4CKEPn0006870@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-Jabber https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191545 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-05-12 16:14 EST ------- I think you have your dependencies backwards. This bug is blocked by 191540; it does not block it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 12 20:20:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 16:20:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191549] New: Review Request: hping3 - TCP/IP stack auditing and much more Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191549 Summary: Review Request: hping3 - TCP/IP stack auditing and much more Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: paul at xtdnet.nl QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: ftp://ftp.xelerance.com/hping3/hping3.spec SRPM URL: ftp://ftp.xelerance.com/hping3/hping3-0.0.20051105-1.src.rpm Description: hping3 is a network tool able to send custom TCP/IP packets and to display target replies like ping do with ICMP replies. hping3 can handle fragmentation, and almost arbitrary packet size and content, using the command line interface. Since version 3, hping implements scripting capabilties hping3 is a drop-in replacement for hping2 (package makes a symlink) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 12 20:45:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 16:45:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191553] New: Review Request: crossfire-maps - map files for the crossfire game server Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191553 Summary: Review Request: crossfire-maps - map files for the crossfire game server Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: wart at kobold.org QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.kobold.org/~wart/fedora/crossfire-maps.spec SRPM URL: http://www.kobold.org/~wart/fedora/crossfire-maps-1.9.0-1.src.rpm Description: Maps for use with the crossfire game server -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 12 20:47:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 16:47:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191553] Review Request: crossfire-maps - map files for the crossfire game server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605122047.k4CKlSrD017072@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: crossfire-maps - map files for the crossfire game server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191553 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |chris.stone at gmail.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 12 20:52:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 16:52:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191040] Review Request: fedora-package-config-apt - Configuration files for the apt package manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605122052.k4CKq5rd018104@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fedora-package-config-apt - Configuration files for the apt package manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191040 ville.skytta at iki.fi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2006-05-12 16:51 EST ------- No SRPM seems to be available for 5.89-3, but if it's the same as -2 apart from the specfile changes, approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 12 21:06:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 17:06:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191545] Review Request: perl-Net-Jabber In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605122106.k4CL65xf021280@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-Jabber https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191545 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |191540 OtherBugsDependingO|191540 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 12 21:06:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 17:06:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191540] Review Request: perl-Net-XMPP In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605122106.k4CL6RQQ021457@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-XMPP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191540 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn|191545 | OtherBugsDependingO| |191545 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 12 21:06:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 17:06:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191540] Review Request: perl-Net-XMPP In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605122106.k4CL6nTL021505@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-XMPP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191540 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |191523 OtherBugsDependingO|191523 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 12 21:07:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 17:07:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191523] Review Request: perl-XML-Stream In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605122107.k4CL7Bpx021610@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-XML-Stream https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191523 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn|191540 | OtherBugsDependingO| |191540 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 12 21:08:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 17:08:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191545] Review Request: perl-Net-Jabber In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605122108.k4CL84T0021756@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-Jabber https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191545 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-05-12 17:08 EST ------- *sigh* At least it's Friday. Fixed -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 12 21:11:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 17:11:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190878] Review Request: childplay_plugins - Plugins for childsplay (educational games for young children) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605122111.k4CLBtl1022588@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: childplay_plugins - Plugins for childsplay (educational games for young children) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190878 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778, 190876 |163779 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 12 21:12:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 17:12:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190876] Review Request: childplay In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605122112.k4CLC9QW022670@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: childplay https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190876 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn|190878 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 12 21:16:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 17:16:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190876] Review Request: childsplay - Suite of educational games for young children In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605122116.k4CLG5Lr023365@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: childsplay - Suite of educational games for young children https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190876 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: childplay |Review Request: childsplay - | |Suite of educational games | |for young children BugsThisDependsOn| |190878 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 12 21:16:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 17:16:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190878] Review Request: childplay_plugins - Plugins for childsplay (educational games for young children) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605122116.k4CLGGFv023455@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: childplay_plugins - Plugins for childsplay (educational games for young children) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190878 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |190876 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 12 21:20:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 17:20:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190878] Review Request: childsplay_plugins - Plugins for childsplay (educational games for young children) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605122120.k4CLKakQ024140@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: childsplay_plugins - Plugins for childsplay (educational games for young children) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190878 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: |childplay_plugins - Plugins |childsplay_plugins - Plugins |for childsplay (educational |for childsplay (educational |games for young children) |games for young children) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 12 21:22:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 17:22:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190992] Review Request: gpar2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605122122.k4CLM2v0024620@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gpar2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190992 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776, 177841 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 12 21:22:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 17:22:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190991] Review Request: libpar2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605122122.k4CLMCGg024660@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libpar2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190991 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776, 177841 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 12 21:22:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 17:22:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190991] Review Request: libpar2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605122122.k4CLMOTx025100@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libpar2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190991 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776, 177841 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 12 21:44:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 17:44:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191540] Review Request: perl-Net-XMPP In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605122144.k4CLiqpn031635@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-XMPP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191540 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-05-12 17:44 EST ------- Fixed dep linkage in BZ. Net/XMPP (off search.cpan.org) says: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Net-XMPP/lib/Net/XMPP.pm#COPYRIGHT "This module is free software, you can redistribute it and/or modify it under the same terms as Perl itself." aka GPL & Artistic. Nonetheless, LICENSE.LGPL does exist in the tarball. I just emailed the author (Ryan Eatmon) asking for clarification. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 12 21:48:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 17:48:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188542] Review Request: hylafax In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605122148.k4CLmMmX032543@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hylafax https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188542 ------- Additional Comments From faxguy at howardsilvan.com 2006-05-12 17:48 EST ------- Please try these once again... it should build now for you in your FC5 environment. I had to remove %{?_smp_mflags} from the make call. Spec URL: http://osdn.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/hylafax/hylafax.spec SRPM URL: http://osdn.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/hylafax/hylafax-4.3.0.1-1.src.rpm At that ... I develop and maintain both hylafax (http://hylafax.sourceforge.net) and iaxmodem (http://iaxmodem.sourceforge.net), and I don't have the kind of time to be spending it reviewing other projects or offering more projects than those that I already develop and maintain - merely to attract the attention of a needed sponsor. I am willing and able to maintain the Fedora Core Extras HylaFAX distribution, but I really am not in a position to do much more than that for Fedora. If I must do more in order to get this project sponsored, then I guess that I'm not the right person for this project in Fedora. Christoph, if you are able, and if you'd like to take this project you are welcome to it. I can assist you in whatever you may need. Otherwise I'm pretty much going to have to wait for a sponsor - either through patience or through nagging people on-list. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 12 21:58:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 17:58:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188207] Review Request: erlang-esdl - SDL bindings for Erlang In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605122158.k4CLwGjO002466@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: erlang-esdl - SDL bindings for Erlang https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188207 gemi at bluewin.ch changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: esdl - SDL |Review Request: erlang-esdl |bindings for Erlang |- SDL bindings for Erlang -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 12 22:04:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 18:04:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189268] Review Request: xscreensaver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605122204.k4CM4grT003934@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xscreensaver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189268 ------- Additional Comments From rstrode at redhat.com 2006-05-12 18:04 EST ------- Yup! This bug is blocking FE-ACCEPT now. Get the account and build the package. Thanks much. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 12 22:06:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 18:06:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191523] Review Request: perl-XML-Stream In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605122206.k4CM6J4t004271@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-XML-Stream https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191523 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |tibbs at math.uh.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 12 22:08:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 18:08:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189009] Review Request: bzrtools - A collection of utilities and plugins for Bazaar-NG In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605122208.k4CM8uYF004874@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bzrtools - A collection of utilities and plugins for Bazaar-NG https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189009 orion at cora.nwra.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |orion at cora.nwra.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From orion at cora.nwra.com 2006-05-12 18:08 EST ------- Looks like you want to update to 0.8.1, but: - spec file is clean and legible. - md5sum matches - rpmlint: E: bzrtools non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/bzrlib/plugins/bzrtools/hunk_selector.py 0644 E: bzrtools non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/bzrlib/plugins/bzrtools/__init__.py 0644 E: bzrtools non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/bzrlib/plugins/bzrtools/diffstat.py 0644 E: bzrtools non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/bzrlib/plugins/bzrtools/shelf_tests.py 0644 E: bzrtools non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/bzrlib/plugins/bzrtools/shelf.py 0644 E: bzrtools non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/bzrlib/plugins/bzrtools/test.py 0644 though since they are library routines, it isn't necessary to be executable. - license matches source. - owns all files and directories. MUST FIX: - add COPYING to %doc. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 12 22:11:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 18:11:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191540] Review Request: perl-Net-XMPP In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605122211.k4CMBwnO005899@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-XMPP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191540 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-05-12 18:11 EST ------- > Net/XMPP (off search.cpan.org) says: > http://search.cpan.org/dist/Net-XMPP/lib/Net/XMPP.pm#COPYRIGHT Yes, but if you click "Source" and look at the prominent copyright notice at the beginning of the file, you'll see the LGPL statement. Unfortunately this package is blocked until we can get this clarified. Hopefully upstream will be responsive. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 12 22:15:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 18:15:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188359] Review Request: bugzilla - bug tracking tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605122215.k4CMFU0Q006444@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bugzilla - bug tracking tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188359 mkanat at bugzilla.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mkanat at bugzilla.org ------- Additional Comments From mkanat at bugzilla.org 2006-05-12 18:15 EST ------- Bugzilla's contrib stuff depends on being where it is, for the most part. The first time you run ./checksetup.pl it creates a various .htaccess files that prevents access to files that people shouldn't be accessing. If you want, you can be clever and generate these files in advance and then include it as a patch with the distro. They don't have anything actually dynamic in them, I think. (And actually, that makes me wonder why we don't just have them in CVS.) You can actually modify Bugzilla to be relocatable, but it's easier to not do it if you don't have to. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 12 22:24:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 18:24:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188359] Review Request: bugzilla - bug tracking tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605122224.k4CMOCAZ008473@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bugzilla - bug tracking tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188359 ------- Additional Comments From mkanat at bugzilla.org 2006-05-12 18:23 EST ------- Looking over the spec file, things look pretty good to me from a Bugzilla standpoint, except that you should probably just have a separate -contrib package but keep the contrib stuff in /var/www/bugzilla/, because a lot of them depend on the Bugzilla/ libraries in that directory and it would be irritating to have to type /usr/lib/bugzilla/script.pl from the /var/www/bugzilla directory. Also, I released 2.22 lately, so the package should probably be updated to that. Maybe if you bug me I'll add a switch to checksetup.pl in future versions that will create all the dynamically-generated files and set all the file permissions properly without trying to connect to the database or compile the templates. :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 12 22:31:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 18:31:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189009] Review Request: bzrtools - A collection of utilities and plugins for Bazaar-NG In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605122231.k4CMVUAx010285@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bzrtools - A collection of utilities and plugins for Bazaar-NG https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189009 ------- Additional Comments From shahms at shahms.com 2006-05-12 18:31 EST ------- Thanks for taking the time to review the package. I added COPYING, updated to 0.8.1 and fixed a minor problem with bzrtools requiring the same version of bzr rather than the actually required version of 0.8 The new files are at: http://shahms.mesd.k12.or.us/packages/bzrtools.spec http://shahms.mesd.k12.or.us/packages/bzrtools-0.8.1-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 12 22:41:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 18:41:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189009] Review Request: bzrtools - A collection of utilities and plugins for Bazaar-NG In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605122241.k4CMfTjr012829@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bzrtools - A collection of utilities and plugins for Bazaar-NG https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189009 ------- Additional Comments From orion at cora.nwra.com 2006-05-12 18:41 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > - rpmlint: > E: bzrtools non-executable-script > /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/bzrlib/plugins/bzrtools/hunk_selector.py 0644 > E: bzrtools non-executable-script > /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/bzrlib/plugins/bzrtools/__init__.py 0644 > E: bzrtools non-executable-script > /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/bzrlib/plugins/bzrtools/diffstat.py 0644 > E: bzrtools non-executable-script > /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/bzrlib/plugins/bzrtools/shelf_tests.py 0644 > E: bzrtools non-executable-script > /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/bzrlib/plugins/bzrtools/shelf.py 0644 > E: bzrtools non-executable-script > /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/bzrlib/plugins/bzrtools/test.py 0644 Oops, these need to get fixed. Those scripts that can be run directly need to be executable. Those that are library modules need to have #!/usr/bin/python stripped from them. More on Monday... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 12 22:44:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 18:44:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188445] Review Request: bootconf In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605122244.k4CMim8X013556@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bootconf https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188445 ------- Additional Comments From mrsam at courier-mta.com 2006-05-12 18:44 EST ------- << why the tools out there aren't already doing the job. >> Neither grubby, nor booty, based on my cursory overview, allows a non-technical person to set common kernel boot options without mucking around with the command line, making a typo, and hosing himself. grubby isn't in base, or Extras. I installed booty. Where's the GUI, that will let me choose to enable or disable the VESA framebuffer, or enable/disable the boot verbosity? It's possible that I missed it, but I wasn't able to find a convenient GUI interface for setting kernel boot options. As far as why those three -- it's because these three are the most common options that someone might need to adjust. <<< While the 3 arguments in question are fairly harmless, in general kernel parameter customization should affect a selected kernel or a selected list of kernels, not every kernel. From running the GUI, that intended behavior is not obvious. >>> The intended audience is not a technical IT developer, who needs to screw around with different kernels and options. The intended audience is a NON-TECHNICAL, desktop user who wants to adjust common, global, boot parameters. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 12 23:43:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 19:43:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 173459] Review Request: initng In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605122343.k4CNhBYL024846@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 ------- Additional Comments From che666 at gmail.com 2006-05-12 19:43 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=128966) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=128966&action=view) 64bit libprovide libdir patch against inting-0.6.6 to be applied with -p0 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 13 01:12:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 21:12:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189783] Review Request: e17: The enlightenment DR17 window manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605130112.k4D1CX43008449@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: e17: The enlightenment DR17 window manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189783 michael at knox.net.nz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From michael at knox.net.nz 2006-05-12 21:12 EST ------- No, I doubt I would be suitable to review and comment on someone's python code. I only said it would be nice to have the menus sync with gnome and kde, however, its not a review requirement that I am aware of. Ignacio has confirmed that the rpmlint is OK, so as far as I am concerned its good to go. I am awaiting the import before I close this request. The menu gen tool should probably be filed as a bug against e17 (once imported and built) as an enhancement, since its e17 is not dependent on it to work. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 13 05:41:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 01:41:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 173459] Review Request: initng In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605130541.k4D5fSaL031153@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 ------- Additional Comments From dragoran at feuerpokemon.de 2006-05-13 01:41 EST ------- (In reply to comment #270) > Created an attachment (id=128966) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=128966&action=view) [edit] > 64bit libprovide libdir patch against inting-0.6.6 to be applied with -p0 > I fixed this upstream -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 13 06:09:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 02:09:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177827] Review Request: python-ctypes - Advanced Foreign Function Interface for Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605130609.k4D692Xa002947@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-ctypes - Advanced Foreign Function Interface for Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177827 toshio at tiki-lounge.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From toshio at tiki-lounge.com 2006-05-13 02:08 EST ------- APPROVED SHA1SUM: f7a7efac9246e3195a6fdb39a10d84d5ed6ff6e6 python-ctypes-0.9.9.6-1.src.rpm 831a731eebf8950a3dd3eb4cc18dbde8c7a859f5 ctypes-0.9.9.6.tar.gz 20edf3c22969a49e6f0bdff9f321e303fa4928e7 python-ctypes.spec Informational: * Note that the CFLAGS=$RPM_OPT_FLAGS definition doesn't seem to do anything for this package. There's no harm in having it but the CFLAGS are actually being pulled in from python, not from the environment. Good: * All review guidelines passed. Highlights follow: * rpmlint has no output. * python-ctypes conforms to the naming guidelines. * License is MIT and included. * The spec file is clear and legible. * Source matches upstream. * Builds on x86_64. * Permissions set properly on all files. * No extraneous directories; no unowned files or directories. * Builds in mock. * Runs through its test suite on x86_64. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 13 06:12:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 02:12:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177827] Review Request: python-ctypes - Advanced Foreign Function Interface for Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605130612.k4D6CBDt003455@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-ctypes - Advanced Foreign Function Interface for Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177827 toshio at tiki-lounge.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From toshio at tiki-lounge.com 2006-05-13 02:11 EST ------- Nice job nasrat and icon. Sorry it took me so long to finish the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 13 06:44:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 02:44:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191239] Review Request: qjackctl - Qt based JACK control application In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605130644.k4D6idNA009540@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qjackctl - Qt based JACK control application https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191239 ------- Additional Comments From seg at haxxed.com 2006-05-13 02:44 EST ------- My preference is to only use macros if there's a solid gain to be had. As in, its something that's expected to change (versions) or it handles something ugly for you (%configure). I don't see any real gain in using macros such as %{_make}. And most of all, the spec templates do not use these macros, which implies to me they should not be used. It would be nice to have an explicit policy up on the wiki for this, even if that policy is "Use whatever, just be consistent", much like the %{buildroot} vs $RPM_BUILD_ROOT policy. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 13 08:34:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 04:34:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191434] Review Request: xarchon - Arcade board game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605130834.k4D8YUSh004143@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xarchon - Arcade board game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191434 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-05-13 04:34 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > MUSTFIX > ======= > * Macro use isn't consistent. 'xarchon' is used in some places, while > %{name} is used in others. > Fixed > SHOULD > ====== > * Don't bother including the NEWS file, it just tells the user to read > the ChangeLog file. > Done > * Missing BR: libXpm-devel on FC-5. > Added (for -devel too) New version: Spec URL: http://home.zonnet.nl/jwrdegoede/xarchon.spec SRPM URL: http://home.zonnet.nl/jwrdegoede/xarchon-0.50-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 13 09:10:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 05:10:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191582] New: Review Request: xgalaga - Galaga clone for X11 Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191582 Summary: Review Request: xgalaga - Galaga clone for X11 Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://home.zonnet.nl/jwrdegoede/xgalaga.spec SRPM URL: http://home.zonnet.nl/jwrdegoede/xgalaga-2.0.34-1.src.rpm Description: A clone of the classic game Galaga for the X Window System. Xgalaga is a space- invader like game with additional features to produce a more interesting game. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 13 09:50:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 05:50:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191434] Review Request: xarchon - Arcade board game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605130950.k4D9owPF020135@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xarchon - Arcade board game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191434 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2006-05-13 05:50 EST ------- Nit: hardcoded .gz man page suffix -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 13 10:10:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 06:10:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191040] Review Request: fedora-package-config-apt - Configuration files for the apt package manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605131010.k4DAAPQv023741@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fedora-package-config-apt - Configuration files for the apt package manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191040 Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net 2006-05-13 06:10 EST ------- Thanks for reviewing & approving. The package for devel has been queued in and I also tagged & built the matching apt package for devel. (apt will still need some cleansing and an upgrade to the next upstream release, which is estimated to happen soon, I'm building apt just to have something to use fedora-package-conf-apt with and not punch dependency holes in devel) Branches for FC-5 and FC-4 have been requested. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 13 10:50:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 06:50:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 173459] Review Request: initng In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605131050.k4DAohP3031819@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 ------- Additional Comments From che666 at gmail.com 2006-05-13 06:50 EST ------- #272 wierd... yesterdays when i sent it here upstream told me that its fixed in head already. still 0.6.6 needed the patch to package up cleanly so i thought cant hurt to submit to here :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 13 10:57:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 06:57:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191434] Review Request: xarchon - Arcade board game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605131057.k4DAvnCY000402@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xarchon - Arcade board game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191434 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-05-13 06:57 EST ------- I always use a harcoded .gz for the manpage suffix. I try to use as little wildcards as possible in my %files sections. If a newer upstream versions installs new files I want to know. I've seen people do %{_bindir}/* %{_mandir}/man6/* etc, which IMHO is not a good idea. I know that the compressing sometimes is done by rpmbuild and the manpage's are installed uncompressed by make install, but AFAIK now a days they always end up being compressed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 13 11:20:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 07:20:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191589] New: Review Request: qsa Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191589 Summary: Review Request: qsa Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: frank-buettner at gmx.net QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Description: qsa is an module for Qt to make application scriptable. At this time I can't present an full working spec/SRP file, because I have seen, that somebody I working on an Qt4 package. So I will/can't present my QT4 spec file. I use only my file for testing. And Qt4 is needes for my package. So I present my primary specfile for preview. And ask if there an interest to add qsa to Fedora Extras. The full description of QSA can be view here: http://www.trolltech.com/products/qt/addon/qsa -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 13 12:03:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 08:03:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191589] Review Request: qsa In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605131203.k4DC3Hj3012466@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qsa https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191589 ------- Additional Comments From giallu at gmail.com 2006-05-13 08:03 EST ------- I have a semi-working spec file for the Qt 3 based one (1.1.x). I did not check the Qt4 source package but I expect the build procedure to be the same ( i.e. plain broken :) ) so if you still have not started to write the spec maybe you can benefit from my previous work. Do you need/want me to submit a formal review request? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 13 12:44:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 08:44:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 165311] Review Request: Tiger, security auditing on UNIX systems In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605131244.k4DCiio4019904@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Tiger, security auditing on UNIX systems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=165311 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-05-13 08:44 EST ------- MUST: ===== * rpmlint output is: W: tiger conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/cron.d/tiger E: tiger non-standard-dir-perm /var/log/tiger 0700 E: tiger non-readable /etc/tiger/tigerrc 0640 E: tiger zero-length /usr/lib64/tiger/systems/default/suid_list E: tiger non-readable /etc/tiger/cronrc 0640 E: tiger non-readable /etc/tiger/tiger.ignore 0600 E: tiger zero-length /usr/lib64/tiger/systems/Linux/2/rel_file_exp_list E: tiger non-standard-dir-perm /var/run/tiger/work 0700 E: tiger non-standard-dir-perm /etc/tiger 0700 W: tiger symlink-should-be-relative /usr/lib64/tiger/tigexp /usr/sbin/tigexp E: tiger zero-length /usr/lib64/tiger/systems/default/rel_file_exp_list W: tiger devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/tiger/version.h W: tiger log-files-without-logrotate /var/log/tiger Most of these are OK / have a good reason / intentional (also see previous comments), so they are ok.I It would be nice if you could fix the symlink though, but that is not a blocker. * Package and spec file named appropriately * Packaged according to packaging guidelines * License (GPL) ok but license file not included! * spec file is legible and in Am. English. * Source matches upstream * Compiles and builds on devel-x86_64 * BR: ok * No locales * No shared libraries * Not relocatable * Package owns / or requires all dirs * No duplicate files & Permissions ok * %clean & macro usage OK * Contains code only * %doc does not affect runtime, and isn't large enough to warrent a sub package * no -devel package needed, no libs / .la files. * no gui -> no .desktop file required MUST fix: ========= * Include COPYING in %doc * Does /usr/lib64/tiger/html actually gets used during execution or are those just docs. If they are just docs the html dir should be under %doc instead of under /usr/lib64/tiger/ * Remove /usr/share/doc/tiger-3.2.1/tiger_logo* these aren't docs nor are they used by any of the docs (no html docs there) if you decide to keep them someplace else (or if the moved html docs need them) remove the x permisson bits . Should fix: =========== * Please remove the: "Please adjust your %{_sysconfdir}/tiger/tigerrc before running." line from %description. Usage notes do not belong in %description. If you want to you can add this to README.fedora. I didn't modify tigerrc and it ran fine though. * Move these 2 lines from %install to %prep replacing buildroot with . : #find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -type d -name CVS | xargs -iX rm -rf "X" find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -type d -name CVS | xargs rm -rf -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 13 13:13:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 09:13:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191589] Review Request: qsa In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605131313.k4DDDsAT024794@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qsa https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191589 ------- Additional Comments From frank-buettner at gmx.net 2006-05-13 09:13 EST ------- I have start written the qsa spec file for Qt4. But this is very difficult at this time without seen the final one for Qt4. So I write it so, that it all way's work. But one feature of qsa must be disabled. When you have an working spec file for qsa then you can post it here and do the job. And I close this review. I think to modify it for Qt4 is not very hard when you disable the editor feature then you can use your spec file for QSA 1.2.1 with Qt 4.1.2. compiling works with configure -release -no-editor -prefix ... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 13 13:28:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 09:28:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190997] Review Request: linux-wlan-ng In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605131328.k4DDSOmP027142@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: linux-wlan-ng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190997 ------- Additional Comments From r.garth at uws.edu.au 2006-05-13 09:28 EST ------- When trying to build the kernel module package I receive the following error sh: line 0: fg: no job control sh: line 0: fg: no job control error: Architecture is not included: i386 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 13 13:31:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 09:31:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190997] Review Request: linux-wlan-ng In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605131331.k4DDVQJV027788@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: linux-wlan-ng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190997 ------- Additional Comments From giallu at gmail.com 2006-05-13 09:31 EST ------- try with: rpmbuild -ba linux-wlan-ng.spec --target=i686 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 13 13:39:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 09:39:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 165311] Review Request: Tiger, security auditing on UNIX systems In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605131339.k4DDdsIw029880@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Tiger, security auditing on UNIX systems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=165311 ------- Additional Comments From gauret at free.fr 2006-05-13 09:39 EST ------- * Sat May 13 2006 Aurelien Bompard 3.2.1-4 - include the COPYING file - put HTML doc in %%doc - drop useless logos - fix %%description - remove CVS dirs in %%prep Spec : http://gauret.free.fr/fichiers/rpms/fedora/tiger.spec SRPM : http://gauret.free.fr/fichiers/rpms/fedora/tiger-3.2.1-4.src.rpm Thanks Hans. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 13 13:49:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 09:49:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187843] Review Request: phpMyAdmin - Web based MySQL browser written in php In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605131349.k4DDnBHM031654@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: phpMyAdmin - Web based MySQL browser written in php https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187843 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at drussell.dnsalias.com 2006-05-13 09:48 EST ------- Re comment #13: I woud expect the individual php-modules to have their own set of dependencies - primarily php itself. Is it necessary for phpmyadmin to also specify that dependency? I think dependencies should be as specfic as possible, not all-encompassing. There are processes then which resolve, iteratively or recursively, all dependencies. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 13 14:09:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 10:09:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191589] Review Request: qsa In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605131409.k4DE9l5g002661@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qsa https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191589 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rdieter at math.unl.edu ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-05-13 10:09 EST ------- FYI, qt4 review is bug 188180 I'd say base your qsa work off that, for now, at least. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 13 14:11:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 10:11:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191589] Review Request: qsa In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605131411.k4DEBmXo002954@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qsa https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191589 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-05-13 10:11 EST ------- As for qsa/qt3, qsa/qt4, I'd recommend submitting each as a separate review request (unless it's more convenient to build package both from a single specfile). Once a spec/srpm is mentioned here, I can start a review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 13 14:29:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 10:29:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191589] Review Request: qsa In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605131429.k4DET6VL005727@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qsa https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191589 ------- Additional Comments From frank-buettner at gmx.net 2006-05-13 10:28 EST ------- Ok I do the work for qsa/Qt4 and Gianluca Sforna can do this for qsa/Qt3. I have found possible a solution for the qt3support part problem. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 13 14:53:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 10:53:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187843] Review Request: phpMyAdmin - Web based MySQL browser written in php In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605131453.k4DErrBU010640@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: phpMyAdmin - Web based MySQL browser written in php https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187843 ------- Additional Comments From rmo at sunnmore.net 2006-05-13 10:53 EST ------- (In reply to comment #14) > Re comment #13: > > I woud expect the individual php-modules to have their own set of dependencies - > primarily php itself. > > Is it necessary for phpmyadmin to also specify that dependency? Seems like cacti, phpldapadmin, mediawiki has a both requires on php-modules and php itself. This way you can specify a version of php to require. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 13 15:09:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 11:09:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189892] Review Request: dssi - Disposable Soft Synth Interface In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605131509.k4DF938P013025@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dssi - Disposable Soft Synth Interface https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189892 green at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From green at redhat.com 2006-05-13 11:09 EST ------- Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/green/FE/FC5/dssi.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/green/FE/FC5/dssi-0.9.1-1.src.rpm Updated to version 0.9.1. Now 64-bit clean. fluidsynth-dssi is a separate package now, which I'll submit shortly (based on nando's ccrma package). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 13 15:12:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 11:12:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191590] New: Review Request: fluidsynth-dssi - a FluidSynth DSSI plugin Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191590 Summary: Review Request: fluidsynth-dssi - a FluidSynth DSSI plugin Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: green at redhat.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/green/FE/FC5/fluidsynth-dssi.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/green/FE/FC5/fluidsynth-dssi-0.9.1-2.src.rpm Description: This is an implementation of the FluidSynth soundfont-playing software synthesizer as a DSSI plugin. It makes use of DSSI's run_multiple_synths() interface to allow sharing of resources between multiple plugin instances -- soundfont data is shared between instances, and FluidSynth's usual voice allocation methods are applied across multiple instances as if each were a FluidSynth channel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 13 15:14:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 11:14:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191590] Review Request: fluidsynth-dssi - a FluidSynth DSSI plugin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605131514.k4DFExpm014090@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fluidsynth-dssi - a FluidSynth DSSI plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191590 green at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841, 189886, 189891, nThis| |189892 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 13 15:15:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 11:15:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189892] Review Request: dssi - Disposable Soft Synth Interface In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605131515.k4DFFANi014138@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dssi - Disposable Soft Synth Interface https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189892 green at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |191590 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 13 15:15:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 11:15:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189886] Review Request: FluidSynth - Real-time software synthesizer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605131515.k4DFFVM9014208@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: FluidSynth - Real-time software synthesizer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189886 green at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |191590 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 13 15:15:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 11:15:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189891] Review Request: liblo - Open Sound Control library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605131515.k4DFFt9X014286@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: liblo - Open Sound Control library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189891 green at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |191590 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 13 15:17:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 11:17:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190045] Review Request: caps - A set of audio plugins for LADSPA In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605131517.k4DFHOBa014672@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: caps - A set of audio plugins for LADSPA https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190045 green at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 13 15:17:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 11:17:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190040] Review Request: hydrogen - Advanced drum machine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605131517.k4DFHh2I014735@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hydrogen - Advanced drum machine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190040 green at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 13 15:18:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 11:18:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190029] Review Request: whysynth-dssi - DSSI software synthesizer plugin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605131518.k4DFILi5014862@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: whysynth-dssi - DSSI software synthesizer plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190029 green at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 13 15:18:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 11:18:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190027] Review Request: hexter-dssi - DSSI software synthesizer plugin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605131518.k4DFIgJi014978@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hexter-dssi - DSSI software synthesizer plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190027 green at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 13 15:19:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 11:19:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189889] Review Request: vkeybd - Virtual MIDI Keyboard In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605131519.k4DFJ5d5015044@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vkeybd - Virtual MIDI Keyboard https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189889 green at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 13 15:19:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 11:19:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189886] Review Request: FluidSynth - Real-time software synthesizer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605131519.k4DFJK25015084@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: FluidSynth - Real-time software synthesizer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189886 green at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 13 15:19:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 11:19:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189884] Review Request: LASH Audio Session Handler In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605131519.k4DFJpFT015257@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: LASH Audio Session Handler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189884 green at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 13 15:20:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 11:20:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189315] Review Request: ardour In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605131520.k4DFKQsB015362@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ardour https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189315 green at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 13 15:48:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 11:48:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191592] New: Review Request: vorbisgain - Adds tags to Ogg Vorbis files to adjust the volume Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191592 Summary: Review Request: vorbisgain - Adds tags to Ogg Vorbis files to adjust the volume Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: noa at resare.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://resare.com/noa/fedora-extras/vorbisgain.spec SRPM URL: http://resare.com/noa/fedora-extras/vorbisgain-0.34-1.fc5.src.rpm Description: VorbisGain is a utility that uses a psychoacoustic method to correct the volume of an Ogg Vorbis file to a predefined standardized loudness. It needs player support to work. Non-supporting players will play back the files without problems, but you'll miss out on the benefits. Nowadays most good players such as ogg123, xmms and mplayer are already compatible. I'd like to have a sponsor also :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 13 15:49:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 11:49:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188180] Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605131549.k4DFnd6c021111@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188180 ------- Additional Comments From laurent.rineau__fc_extra at normalesup.org 2006-05-13 11:49 EST ------- I have not yet looked at the generated RPMs, but I found some odd things: -?Your spec file defines a sub-package named "styles", but there is no %files section for it. -?Between 4.1.2-6 and 4.1.2-8, the diff shows that you remove LICENSE.QPL from packages. The license of qt4 free edition is GPL/QPL (even if Trolltech tries to make users forget the QPL license). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 13 16:00:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 12:00:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187843] Review Request: phpMyAdmin - Web based MySQL browser written in php In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605131600.k4DG0Vmf023028@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: phpMyAdmin - Web based MySQL browser written in php https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187843 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at drussell.dnsalias.com 2006-05-13 12:00 EST ------- (In reply to comment #15)and > This way you can specify a version of php to require. By all means, if a specific version of php is required, then list it as a requirement. Is that the case? I'm just saying don't list php as a requirement just because php-modules requies php. List the fewest requirements/dependencies as possible, and still be complete - let the dependency-resolver process do its job. :-) A general rule of thumb: do not list a dependency that is already a dependency of one of your dependents. So, if A depends on B, and B depends on C, it is not necessary (nor desirable) to list C as a dependent of A. If some special version of C (Cs) is required by A, then yes: A requires B A requires Cs B requires C Anyway... it's not my intention to take up a lot of bandwidth on 'depency theory'. :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 13 16:08:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 12:08:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188180] Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605131608.k4DG8kx1024310@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188180 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-05-13 12:08 EST ------- Re: styles. I, at one time, included the option to make a -styles subpkg. I should probably remove that old crud. Re: Licensing and LICENSE.QPL >From my reading of http://www.trolltech.com/company/about/businessmodel qt4 can be either used as GPL/opensource or commericial/QPL. However, on second though, it appears this applies to applications that use qt4, not qt4 itself, which is still dual licensed. I'll re-ad the QPL bits. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 13 16:10:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 12:10:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188180] Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605131610.k4DGAgn7024663@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188180 ------- Additional Comments From laurent.rineau__fc_extra at normalesup.org 2006-05-13 12:10 EST ------- What does mean "InitialPreference=5" in the desktop file? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 13 16:13:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 12:13:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188180] Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605131613.k4DGDEdN025099@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188180 frank-buettner at gmx.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |frank-buettner at gmx.net ------- Additional Comments From frank-buettner at gmx.net 2006-05-13 12:13 EST ------- Hello, I have read your spec file. I think you can remove the motif stuff, because it is not longer an part of Qt. And the second you can add the option -no-qt3support to the config script. Because the Qt3 support of Qt4 is not very good. So at this time it is better to use Qt3 and not the Qt3 support layer of Qt4. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 13 16:17:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 12:17:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188180] Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605131617.k4DGHemg025938@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188180 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-05-13 12:17 EST ------- I'd rather not -no-qt3support, since that currently breaks PyQt4. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 13 16:19:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 12:19:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191592] Review Request: vorbisgain - Adds tags to Ogg Vorbis files to adjust the volume In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605131619.k4DGJNmK026236@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vorbisgain - Adds tags to Ogg Vorbis files to adjust the volume https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191592 bdpepple at ameritech.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |bdpepple at ameritech.net OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 13 16:20:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 12:20:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189315] Review Request: ardour In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605131620.k4DGKLLM026393@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ardour https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189315 ------- Additional Comments From green at redhat.com 2006-05-13 12:20 EST ------- Updated to 0.99.3 sources... Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/green/FE/FC5/ardour.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/green/FE/FC5/ardour-0.99.3-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 13 16:21:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 12:21:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188180] Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605131621.k4DGLjeW026638@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188180 ------- Additional Comments From laurent.rineau__fc_extra at normalesup.org 2006-05-13 12:21 EST ------- (In reply to comment #24) > And the second you can add the option > -no-qt3support to the config script. Because the Qt3 support of Qt4 is not very > good. So at this time it is better to use Qt3 and not the Qt3 support layer of Qt4. Please don't. A developper can use qt3to4 as a first step to migrate a Qt-3 application to Qt-4. And qt3to4 uses libQt3Support. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 13 16:23:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 12:23:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188180] Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605131623.k4DGNYm5027005@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188180 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-05-13 12:23 EST ------- Re: comment #23, InitialPreference: The .desktop file with the highest InitialPreference for a given mime type will be the default application. I guess it's mostly bogus, so I'll remove it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 13 16:32:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 12:32:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187843] Review Request: phpMyAdmin - Web based MySQL browser written in php In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605131632.k4DGWKTU028681@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: phpMyAdmin - Web based MySQL browser written in php https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187843 ------- Additional Comments From rmo at sunnmore.net 2006-05-13 12:32 EST ------- (In reply to comment #16) > Anyway... it's not my intention to take up a lot of bandwidth on 'depency > theory'. :-) yes, I subscribe to your theory, and think you are right :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 13 16:33:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 12:33:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188180] Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605131633.k4DGX8Nn029012@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188180 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-05-13 12:32 EST ------- Spec Name or Url: http://kde-redhat.unl.edu/apt/kde-redhat/SPECS/qt4-4.1.2-10.spec SRPM Name or Url: http://kde-redhat.unl.edu/apt/kde-redhat/all/SRPMS.stable/qt4-4.1.2-10.src.rpm %changelog * Sat May 13 2006 Rex Dieter 4.1.2-10 - cleanup/simplify license bits, include LICENSE.QPL - drop unused -styles/-Xt subpkg reference - drop unused motif extention bits - drop initialpreference from .deskstop files -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 13 16:33:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 12:33:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191589] Review Request: qsa In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605131633.k4DGXHbF029062@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qsa https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191589 ------- Additional Comments From frank-buettner at gmx.net 2006-05-13 12:33 EST ------- So the first version of the spec file is ready. http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/qsmartcard/qsa.spec?download As far the Qt4 package is ready I can remove the hard coded Qt path and the rest of the work. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 13 16:33:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 12:33:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190040] Review Request: hydrogen - Advanced drum machine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605131633.k4DGXxii029266@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hydrogen - Advanced drum machine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190040 green at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |183912, 189313 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From green at redhat.com 2006-05-13 12:33 EST ------- I've fixed an x86-64 install issue. Updated bits are here... Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/green/FE/FC5/hydrogen.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/green/FE/FC5/hydrogen-0.9.3-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 13 16:34:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 12:34:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 183912] Review Request: jack-audio-connection-kit - The Jack Audio Connection Kit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605131634.k4DGYLMf029335@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jack-audio-connection-kit - The Jack Audio Connection Kit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183912 green at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |190040 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 13 16:34:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 12:34:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189313] Review Request: liblrdf In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605131634.k4DGYl6e029513@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: liblrdf https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189313 green at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |190040 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 13 16:36:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 12:36:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190040] Review Request: hydrogen - Advanced drum machine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605131636.k4DGa9MY029967@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hydrogen - Advanced drum machine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190040 green at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |183912, 189313 OtherBugsDependingO|183912, 189313 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 13 16:36:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 12:36:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 183912] Review Request: jack-audio-connection-kit - The Jack Audio Connection Kit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605131636.k4DGaLnK029996@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jack-audio-connection-kit - The Jack Audio Connection Kit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183912 green at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn|190040 | OtherBugsDependingO| |190040 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 13 16:37:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 12:37:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189313] Review Request: liblrdf In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605131637.k4DGbGYL030218@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: liblrdf https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189313 green at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn|190040 | OtherBugsDependingO| |190040 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 13 16:40:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 12:40:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188180] Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605131640.k4DGepA0031102@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188180 ------- Additional Comments From frank-buettner at gmx.net 2006-05-13 12:40 EST ------- Yes your are right for the migrate process the support layer be usefull. Only for release apps it is not. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 13 16:43:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 12:43:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191594] New: Review Request: gtkglextmm Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191594 Summary: Review Request: gtkglextmm Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: gilles.gagniard at gmail.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://jaile.ath.cx/gilles/fedora_core_5/gtkglextmm.spec SRPM URL: http://jaile.ath.cx/gilles/fedora_core_5/gtkglextmm-1.2.0-1.src.rpm Description: gtkglextmm is a C++ wrapper for GtkGlExt, an OpenGL extension to GTK+ (See http://gtkglext.sourceforge.net for more information). Please also note that this is my first package and that I need a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 13 16:43:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 12:43:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191589] Review Request: qsa In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605131643.k4DGhWWQ031783@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qsa https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191589 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-05-13 12:43 EST ------- There's no need to hard-code the qt path, at least not in the qt4 case, since it uses pkg-config. Use this instead to define qtdir: BuildRequires: qt4-devel %global qtdir %(pkg-config --variable=prefix QtCore) and %files should probably be like: %files ... %qtdir/lib/libqsa.so.* %files devel ... %qtdir/lib/libqsa.so qsa-devel certainly will need Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} Requires: qt4-devel -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 13 16:43:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 12:43:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191589] Review Request: qsa: Qt Script for Applications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605131643.k4DGhuTN031862@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qsa: Qt Script for Applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191589 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: qsa |Review Request: qsa: Qt | |Script for Applications -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 13 16:46:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 12:46:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191594] Review Request: gtkglextmm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605131646.k4DGkgiU032335@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtkglextmm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191594 gilles.gagniard at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 13 16:57:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 12:57:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188180] Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605131657.k4DGvYWB001665@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188180 ------- Additional Comments From frank-buettner at gmx.net 2006-05-13 12:57 EST ------- Will be better to name the variable %define qt_dirname qt4 to %define qt_dirname qt-%{version} like it is in the Qt3 package? Then it is mutch cleaner when the new KDE version comes witch build on Qt4. I find /usr/lib/qt-4.2.1 better then only /usr/lib/qt4 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 13 17:06:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 13:06:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188180] Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605131706.k4DH6SMJ003140@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188180 ------- Additional Comments From laurent.rineau__fc_extra at normalesup.org 2006-05-13 13:06 EST ------- Having installed the new packages, and done ugly things like for f in $(rpm -qlp RPMS/x86_64/qt4-docs-4.1.2-9.x86_64.rpm); do \ ll $f -d --color=yes; \ done | less -r here is my updated review: ** In: for i in designer qmake qtconfig ; do ln -s ../%{_lib}/%{qt_dirname}/bin/$i %{buildroot}%{_bindir}/${i}4 done i think you should add "assistant linguist lupdate moc qm2ts uic rcc". I agree with your choice, but maybe some other developers would find strange that you forgot to symlink their favorite Qt tool. And you can symlink qt3to4 without changing its name. ** Why a sub-package for qtconfig, actually? Maybe you have a reason. ** pkgconfig file seem to be hardlinked in %{_libdir}/pkgconfig/ (from %{qt_dir}/lib/*.pc) instead of being symlinked. Maybe this should be fixed (even if I doubt that someone has a mount point for %{_libdir}/qt4). ** rpmlint still complains about a lot of things, among: W: qt4-devel summary-ended-with-dot Development files for the Qt GUI toolkit. W: qt4-mysql summary-ended-with-dot MySQL drivers for Qt's SQL classes. W: qt4-odbc summary-ended-with-dot ODBC drivers for Qt's SQL classes. W: qt4-postgresql summary-ended-with-dot PostgreSQL drivers for Qt's SQL classes. W: qt4-sqlite summary-ended-with-dot SQLite drivers for Qt's SQL classes. Easy fix. E: qt4-devel invalid-directory-reference /usr/lib64/pkgconfig/QtNetwork.pc E: qt4-devel invalid-directory-reference /usr/lib64/pkgconfig/QtSvg.pc E: qt4-devel invalid-directory-reference /usr/lib64/pkgconfig/QtTest.pc E: qt4-devel invalid-directory-reference /usr/lib64/pkgconfig/Qt3Support.pc E: qt4-devel invalid-directory-reference /usr/lib64/pkgconfig/QtSql.pc E: qt4-devel invalid-directory-reference /usr/lib64/pkgconfig/QtGui.pc E: qt4-devel invalid-directory-reference /usr/lib64/pkgconfig/QtXml.pc E: qt4-devel invalid-directory-reference /usr/lib64/pkgconfig/QtCore.pc E: qt4-devel invalid-directory-reference /usr/lib64/pkgconfig/QtOpenGL.pc Still -L%{_buildir}/qt-x11-opensource-src-4.1.2/lib in pkg-config files. sed can fix that. W: qt4-docs dangling-relative-symlink /usr/lib64/qt4/LICENSE.GPL doc/LICENSE.gpl It is a new item. I have seen this link in the spec file. I do not understand. ** Two minor items of my first review are still left without answer: - The /etc/ld.so.conf.d stuff is not really clear. /etc/ld.so.conf.d is requires by FC qt on FC-4 and FC-5. And I doubt that qt4 could be accepted for previous versions of FC. Perhaps you should simplify your spec file by assuming that /etc/ld.so.conf.d/ is required. - Your spec file use both %{buildroot} and $RPM_BUILD_ROOT. According to http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#UsingBuildRootOptFlags you should avoid to mixe the two forms. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 13 17:16:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 13:16:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188180] Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605131716.k4DHGTGB004875@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188180 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-05-13 13:16 EST ------- Re: comment #30 I'm sticking to %{_libdir}/qt4, as other apps can install stuff in here (like qsa, qwt), and I don't want the dir changing everytime a new version is built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 13 17:17:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 13:17:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188180] Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605131717.k4DHHCA9005032@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188180 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-05-13 13:16 EST ------- Re: comment #30 I'm sticking to %{_libdir}/qt4, as other apps can install stuff in here (like qsa, qwt), and I don't want the dir changing everytime a new version is built. ------- Additional Comments From laurent.rineau__fc_extra at normalesup.org 2006-05-13 13:16 EST ------- "Mid-air collision": the traffic in this bug starts to be too high for me! :-) My review in comment #31 is for 4.1.2-9. I'm compiling 4.1.2-10... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 13 17:22:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 13:22:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188180] Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605131722.k4DHMVSI005831@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188180 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-05-13 13:22 EST ------- Yeah, especially considerring no one is yet "officially" reviewing this package (at least it's not assigned to anyone). (: OTOH, I don't mind having more eyes on it... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 13 17:27:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 13:27:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188180] Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605131727.k4DHROtm006607@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188180 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-05-13 13:27 EST ------- Re: comment #31 and -qtconfig subpkg rationale so no collisions on x86_64 for folks who want/need both qt4.i386 qt4.x86_64 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 13 17:30:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 13:30:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188180] Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605131730.k4DHUp1t007267@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188180 ------- Additional Comments From laurent.rineau__fc_extra at normalesup.org 2006-05-13 13:30 EST ------- (In reply to comment #35) > Re: comment #31 and -qtconfig subpkg rationale > so no collisions on x86_64 for folks who want/need both qt4.i386 qt4.x86_64 ... (!) A real good reason. I had not noticed that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 13 17:46:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 13:46:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191592] Review Request: vorbisgain - Adds tags to Ogg Vorbis files to adjust the volume In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605131746.k4DHkZ5F009836@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vorbisgain - Adds tags to Ogg Vorbis files to adjust the volume https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191592 bdpepple at ameritech.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at ameritech.net 2006-05-13 13:46 EST ------- MD5Sums: ee62352b74c610bb3eeddda038819fc8 vorbisgain-0.34.zip Good: * Source URL is canonical * Upstream source tarball verified * Group Tag is from the official list * Buildroot has all required elements * All paths begin with macros * All directories are owned by this or other packages * All necessary BuildRequires listed. * All desired features are enabled * Make succeeds even when %{_smp_mflags} is defined * Files have appropriate permissions and owners * rpmlint produces no errors * Package installs and uninstalls cleanly on FC5 * Software runs fine Minor: * License is LGPL, not GPL. * Inconsistant use of '$RPM_BUILD_ROOT' & '%buildroot'. Use only one or the other. These two items can be corrected after you import them into FE CVS +1 APPROVE I'll also be your sponser. If you haven't created an account yet, you will need to do so. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/Contributors#head-a89c07b5b8abe7748b6b39f0f89768d595234907 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 13 17:52:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 13:52:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188180] Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605131752.k4DHqdbU010725@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188180 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-05-13 13:52 EST ------- Slammed this one out, so not sure if it builds. (: (I'll update again if my current build fails). Spec Name or Url: http://kde-redhat.unl.edu/apt/kde-redhat/SPECS/qt4-4.1.2-11.spec SRPM Name or Url: http://kde-redhat.unl.edu/apt/kde-redhat/all/SRPMS.stable/qt4-4.1.2-11.src.rpm %changelog * Sat May 13 2006 Rex Dieter 4.1.2-11 - drop optional ld.so.conf.d usage, make mandatory - make %%_bindir symlinks to all %%qtdir/bin stuff (even qt3to4) - pkgconfig files: hardlinks -> relative symlinks, strip -L%{_libdir}/mysql and -L%%{_builddir}/qt-x11-opensource-src-%%version/lib - cleanup/simplify Summary/%%description entries - $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -> %%buildroot, $RPM_BUILD_DIR -> %%_builddir -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 13 19:24:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 15:24:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 176374] Review Request: nagios-plugins In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605131924.k4DJO9Xv031444@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nagios-plugins https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176374 ------- Additional Comments From jpo at di.uminho.pt 2006-05-13 15:23 EST ------- Mike, Missing requirements -------------------- Every external binary needed by a plugin needs to be on the requirement list of that plugin. An example, the check_fping plugin requires the /usr/sbin/fping file (or the fping package). Right now you are only requiring it during the building process. $ strace -f -e trace=execve ./check_fping 127.0.0.1 execve("./check_fping", ["./check_fping", "127.0.0.1"], [/* 23 vars */]) = 0 Process 9277 attached [pid 9277] execve("/usr/sbin/fping", ["/usr/sbin/fping", "-b", "56", "-c", "1", "127.0.0.1"], [/* 1 var */]) = 0 Process 9277 detached --- SIGCHLD (Child exited) @ 0 (0) --- Other plugins will needed to be checked. Will try to check a couple more during in the next days. Net::SNMP --------- Are you removing the following two plugins because http://search.cpan.org/dist/Net-SNMP/ isn't available in Extras? # check_ifoperstatus and check_ifstatus require Net::SNMP %{__rm} %{buildroot}/%{_libdir}/nagios/plugins/check_ifoperstatus %{__rm} %{buildroot}/%{_libdir}/nagios/plugins/check_ifstatus I will see if I can package it ASAP. /jpo -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 13 19:27:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 15:27:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191603] New: Review Request: rsnapshot -- rsync-based filesystem snapshots Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191603 Summary: Review Request: rsnapshot -- rsync-based filesystem snapshots Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: lists at forevermore.net QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://forevermore.net/files/packages/rsnapshot/rsnapshot.spec SRPM URL: http://forevermore.net/files/packages/rsnapshot/rsnapshot-1.2.1-1.src.rpm Description: This is a remote backup program that uses rsync to take backup snapshots of filesystems. It uses hard links to save space on disk. See http://rsnapshot.org for more info. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 13 19:28:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 15:28:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 165311] Review Request: Tiger, security auditing on UNIX systems In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605131928.k4DJS9Yv032172@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Tiger, security auditing on UNIX systems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=165311 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-05-13 15:27 EST ------- All MUST and Should items fixed. Approved! And your welcome :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 13 19:41:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 15:41:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191604] New: Review Request: lineakd - linux easy-access-key daemon Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191604 Summary: Review Request: lineakd - linux easy-access-key daemon Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: lists at forevermore.net QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://forevermore.net/files/packages/lineak/lineakd.spec SRPM URL: http://forevermore.net/files/packages/lineak/lineakd-0.8.4-1.src.rpm Description: Lineakd is a daemon that can be programmed to watch for events from easy-access and multimedia keys on recent keyboards. It can respond to the events by running programs, sending events to existing programs, changing the volume, etc. (please also see forthcoming plugin packages: lineak_defaultplugin, lineak_kdeplugins, lineak_xosdplugin) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 13 19:42:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 15:42:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191605] New: Review Request: lineak_defaultplugin - default actions for lineakd Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191605 Summary: Review Request: lineak_defaultplugin - default actions for lineakd Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: lists at forevermore.net QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://forevermore.net/files/packages/lineak/lineak_defaultplugin.spec SRPM URL: http://forevermore.net/files/packages/lineak/lineak_defaultplugin-0.8.4-1.src.rpm Description: Plugin for lineakd that contains most of its default actions. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 13 19:45:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 15:45:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191606] New: Review Request: lineak_kdeplugins - KDE-based actions for lineakd Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191606 Summary: Review Request: lineak_kdeplugins - KDE-based actions for lineakd Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: lists at forevermore.net QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://forevermore.net/files/packages/lineak/lineak_kdeplugins.spec SRPM URL: http://forevermore.net/files/packages/lineak/lineak_kdeplugins-0.8.4-1.src.rpm Description: Plugin for lineakd to support KDE and many of its applications. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 13 19:46:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 15:46:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191605] Review Request: lineak_defaultplugin - default actions for lineakd In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605131946.k4DJkLtw003965@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lineak_defaultplugin - default actions for lineakd https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191605 lists at forevermore.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |191604 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 13 19:46:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 15:46:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191604] Review Request: lineakd - linux easy-access-key daemon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605131946.k4DJkgYb004018@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lineakd - linux easy-access-key daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191604 lists at forevermore.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |191605 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 13 19:46:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 15:46:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191606] Review Request: lineak_kdeplugins - KDE-based actions for lineakd In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605131946.k4DJkoEa004030@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lineak_kdeplugins - KDE-based actions for lineakd https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191606 lists at forevermore.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |191604 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 13 19:47:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 15:47:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191604] Review Request: lineakd - linux easy-access-key daemon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605131947.k4DJl1dp004072@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lineakd - linux easy-access-key daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191604 lists at forevermore.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |191606 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 13 19:47:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 15:47:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191607] New: Review Request: lineak_xosdplugin - Onscreen display support for lineakd Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191607 Summary: Review Request: lineak_xosdplugin - Onscreen display support for lineakd Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: lists at forevermore.net QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://forevermore.net/files/packages/lineak/lineak_xosdplugin.spec SRPM URL: http://forevermore.net/files/packages/lineak/lineak_xosdplugin-0.8.4-1.src.rpm Description: Plugin for lineakd to add support for onscreen display via XOSD. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 13 19:48:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 15:48:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191607] Review Request: lineak_xosdplugin - Onscreen display support for lineakd In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605131948.k4DJmnNr004430@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lineak_xosdplugin - Onscreen display support for lineakd https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191607 lists at forevermore.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |191604 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 13 19:49:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 15:49:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191604] Review Request: lineakd - linux easy-access-key daemon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605131949.k4DJn0uB004493@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lineakd - linux easy-access-key daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191604 lists at forevermore.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |191607 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 13 20:13:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 16:13:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188180] Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605132013.k4DKDHEE008233@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188180 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-05-13 16:13 EST ------- Sure enough, specfile had a small typo(*), I fixed it, respun without incrementing Release. (*) diff: - [-f $i ] && ln -s $i . + [ -f $i ] && ln -s $i . -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 13 20:23:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 16:23:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187843] Review Request: phpMyAdmin - Web based MySQL browser written in php In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605132023.k4DKNi1x010157@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: phpMyAdmin - Web based MySQL browser written in php https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187843 ------- Additional Comments From imlinux at gmail.com 2006-05-13 16:23 EST ------- Figure I'd chime in on this. The packaging guidelines are fairly vague on this, the closest thing I can find only relates to libraries: "RPM has very good capabilities of automatically finding dependencies for libraries and eg. Perl modules. In short, don't reinvent the wheel, but just let rpm do its job. There is usually no need to explicitly list eg. Requires: XFree86 when the dependency has already been picked up by rpm in the form of depending on libraries in the XFree86 package." In the interest of consistancy I'll add php to the requires section. (I'm also the packager of Cacti and it is in there) SPEC: http://mmcgrath.net/~mmcgrath/phpMyAdmin/phpMyAdmin.spec SRPM: http://mmcgrath.net/~mmcgrath/phpMyAdmin/phpMyAdmin-2.8.0.4-1.src.rpm Also, all my test show that php will actually pull httpd in every time so I'm not sure using webserver makes any difference right now but it might in the future. changelog: - New upstream version - added php as requires - changed httpd to webserver as a requires -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 13 20:40:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 16:40:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188180] Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605132040.k4DKeCW9013754@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188180 ------- Additional Comments From laurent.rineau__fc_extra at normalesup.org 2006-05-13 16:39 EST ------- /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.38358: line 49: [-f: command not found + rm -rf /var/tmp/qt4-4.1.2-11-root-rineau/usr/lib64/qt4/doc + ln -s ../../share/doc/qt4-devel-4.1.2 /var/tmp/qt4-4.1.2-11-root-rineau/usr/lib64/qt4/doc + install -p 'LICENSE.*' /var/tmp/qt4-4.1.2-11-root-rineau/usr/lib64/qt4/ install: cannot stat `LICENSE.*': No such file or directory See the last line I quoted. Thus, another diff: for i in ../%{qt_dirname}/lib/*.pc ; do [ -f $i ] && ln -s $i . done + popd Kill your build and retry! :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 13 20:48:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 16:48:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188180] Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605132048.k4DKmp34015415@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188180 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-05-13 16:48 EST ------- Crap, ok. (: (I fixed the qt4-4.1.2-11 links to, but...) Spec Name or Url: http://kde-redhat.unl.edu/apt/kde-redhat/SPECS/qt4-4.1.2-12.spec SRPM Name or Url: http://kde-redhat.unl.edu/apt/kde-redhat/all/SRPMS.stable/qt4-4.1.2-12.src.rpm %changelog * Sat May 13 2006 Rex Dieter 4.1.2-12 - fix typos so it actually builds. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 13 20:56:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 16:56:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189322] Review Request: rosegarden4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605132056.k4DKutWr016781@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rosegarden4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189322 ------- Additional Comments From green at redhat.com 2006-05-13 16:56 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=128983) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=128983&action=view) Patch for x86-64 ladspa This patch tells rosegarden4 to look for plugins in lib64 instead of lib. Just conditionally apply it in the spec file like so... # Conditionally apply patch to read ladspa plugins from lib64 dir. %ifarch x86_64 %patch1 -p0 %endif Admittedly, this is a bit of a hack. I'll follow up with upstream to make sure there's a cleaner solution in the next release. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 13 21:08:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 17:08:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189315] Review Request: ardour In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605132108.k4DL8AWn018572@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ardour https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189315 ------- Additional Comments From green at redhat.com 2006-05-13 17:08 EST ------- Read ladspa plugins from lib64 dirs on x86-64 systems.... Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/green/FE/FC5/ardour.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/green/FE/FC5/ardour-0.99.3-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 13 21:17:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 17:17:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190040] Review Request: hydrogen - Advanced drum machine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605132117.k4DLHGIc020168@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hydrogen - Advanced drum machine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190040 ------- Additional Comments From green at redhat.com 2006-05-13 17:17 EST ------- On x86-64, read ladspa plugins from lib64 dirs... Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/green/FE/FC5/hydrogen.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/green/FE/FC5/hydrogen-0.9.3-3.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 13 21:27:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 17:27:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189313] Review Request: liblrdf In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605132127.k4DLRSjb021967@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: liblrdf https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189313 bugs.michael at gmx.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From bugs.michael at gmx.net 2006-05-13 17:27 EST ------- Confirming bottom of comment 5. /usr/share/ladspa/rdf/ladspa.rdfs is a useless example for a classification of ladspa plugins. Inside Hydrogen it is recognised without any of the classified ladspa plugins being available. The file should not be included in the package. (Do we have any ladspa package in the queue which comes with an rdf file?) APPROVED if you fix that remaining issue. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 13 21:41:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 17:41:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190040] Review Request: hydrogen - Advanced drum machine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605132141.k4DLfoLq025212@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hydrogen - Advanced drum machine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190040 bugs.michael at gmx.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bugs.michael at gmx.net OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From bugs.michael at gmx.net 2006-05-13 17:41 EST ------- [wrt 0.9.3-2] * FE-NEEDSPONSOR blocker bug is for new contributors who don't have CVS access yet. You don't belong to that group anymore. * Fails to build (FC5), due to a hardcoded -lxml2 in configure{.in}. /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lxml2 collect2: ld returned 1 exit status Missing: BuildRequires: libxml2-devel * From the build log: | --- Checking for PortAudio ------------------------------------- | checking whether PORTAUDIOPATH environment variable is set... | PORTAUDIOPATH is not set. No PortAudio support. | ----------------------------------------------------------------- PortAudio is available in Extras. Should it be enabled? * rpmlint hydrogen-0.9.3-2.i386.rpm E: hydrogen shared-lib-without-dependency-information /usr/lib/hydrogen/plugins/wasp_noisifier.so E: hydrogen shared-lib-without-dependency-information /usr/lib/hydrogen/plugins/wasp_booster.so E: hydrogen shared-lib-without-dependency-information /usr/lib/hydrogen/plugins/wasp_xshaper.so E: hydrogen script-without-shellbang /usr/share/applications/hydrogen.desktop The first three are safe to ignore. The latter is not. .desktop file is executable. The review guidelines say it must be installed with desktop-file-install. * The explicit Requires on package names are not good. Kill them and rely on rpmbuild's automatic dependencies on SONAMES. * The hardcoded Qt version is not good. Source /etc/profile.d/qt.sh which sets QTDIR correctly. Further, since many Qt configure checks fail due to multilib locations, set QTLIB/QTINC like this: --- hydrogen.spec.orig 2006-05-13 18:31:34.000000000 +0200 +++ hydrogen.spec 2006-05-13 22:58:46.000000000 +0200 @@ -11,8 +11,6 @@ BuildRequires: flac-devel jack-audio-connection-kit-devel liblrdf-devel BuildRequires: qt-devel libsndfile-devel alsa-lib-devel -Requires: flac jack-audio-connection-kit liblrdf -Requires: qt libsndfile alsa-lib %description Hydrogen is an advanced drum machine for GNU/Linux. It's main goal is @@ -25,8 +23,10 @@ sed --in-place -e 's:$(prefix)/lib:%{_libdir}:g' plugins/wasp/Makefile.in %build -%configure QTDIR=%{_libdir}/qt-3.3 -%{__make} %{?_smp_mflags} QTDIR=%{_libdir}/qt-3.3 +unset QTDIR || : ; . /etc/profile.d/qt.sh +export QTLIB=${QTDIR}/lib QTINC=${QTDIR}/include +%configure +%{__make} %{?_smp_mflags} %install %{__rm} -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 13 21:45:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 17:45:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188180] Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605132145.k4DLjU2L025974@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188180 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-05-13 17:45 EST ------- note to self: thou shalt not update Review Requests without first actually testing the build. Spec Name or Url: http://kde-redhat.unl.edu/apt/kde-redhat/SPECS/qt4-4.1.2-13.spec SRPM Name or Url: http://kde-redhat.unl.edu/apt/kde-redhat/all/SRPMS.stable/qt4-4.1.2-13.src.rpm %changelog * Sat May 13 2006 Rex Dieter 4.1.2-13 - include unpackaged pkgconfig files -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 13 23:10:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 19:10:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191619] New: Review Request: perl-CSS-Tiny - Read/Write .css files with as little code as possible Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191619 Summary: Review Request: perl-CSS-Tiny - Read/Write .css files with as little code as possible Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: jpo at di.uminho.pt QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://gsd.di.uminho.pt/jpo/software/fedora/perl-CSS-Tiny.spec SRPM URL: http://gsd.di.uminho.pt/jpo/software/fedora/perl-CSS-Tiny-1.11-1.src.rpm Description: CSS::Tiny is a perl class to read and write .css stylesheets with as little code as possible, reducing load time and memory overhead. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 13 23:12:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 19:12:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191620] New: Review Request: perl-PPI-HTML - Generate syntax-hightlighted HTML for Perl using PPI Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191620 Summary: Review Request: perl-PPI-HTML - Generate syntax- hightlighted HTML for Perl using PPI Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: jpo at di.uminho.pt QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://gsd.di.uminho.pt/jpo/software/fedora/perl-PPI-HTML.spec SRPM URL: http://gsd.di.uminho.pt/jpo/software/fedora/perl-PPI-HTML-1.07-1.src.rpm Description: PPI::HTML converts Perl documents into syntax highlighted HTML pages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 13 23:12:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 19:12:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191620] Review Request: perl-PPI-HTML - Generate syntax-hightlighted HTML for Perl using PPI In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605132312.k4DNCsxe008338@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-PPI-HTML - Generate syntax-hightlighted HTML for Perl using PPI https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191620 jpo at di.uminho.pt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |191619 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 13 23:13:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 19:13:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191619] Review Request: perl-CSS-Tiny - Read/Write .css files with as little code as possible In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605132313.k4DND6c7008365@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-CSS-Tiny - Read/Write .css files with as little code as possible https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191619 jpo at di.uminho.pt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |191620 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 13 23:28:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 19:28:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191622] New: Review Request: perl-Expect - Expect for Perl Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191622 Summary: Review Request: perl-Expect - Expect for Perl Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: jpo at di.uminho.pt QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://gsd.di.uminho.pt/jpo/software/fedora/perl-Expect.spec SRPM URL: http://gsd.di.uminho.pt/jpo/software/fedora/perl-Expect-1.16-1.src.rpm Description: The Perl Expect module was inspired more by the functionality of Tcl/Expect than any previous Expect-like tool such as Comm.pl or chat2.pl. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 13 23:29:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 19:29:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191623] New: Review Request: perl-Expect-Simple - Wrapper around the Expect module Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191623 Summary: Review Request: perl-Expect-Simple - Wrapper around the Expect module Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: jpo at di.uminho.pt QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://gsd.di.uminho.pt/jpo/software/fedora/perl-Expect-Simple.spec SRPM URL: http://gsd.di.uminho.pt/jpo/software/fedora/perl-Expect-Simple-0.02-1.src.rpm Description: Expect::Simple is a wrapper around the Expect module which should suffice for simple applications. It hides most of the Expect machinery; the Expect object is available for tweaking if need be. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 13 23:31:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 19:31:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191624] New: Review Request: perl-Test-Expect - Automated driving and testing of terminal-based programs Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191624 Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-Expect - Automated driving and testing of terminal-based programs Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: jpo at di.uminho.pt QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://gsd.di.uminho.pt/jpo/software/fedora/perl-Test-Expect.spec SRPM URL: http://gsd.di.uminho.pt/jpo/software/fedora/perl-Test-Expect-0.30-1.src.rpm Description: Test::Expect is a module for automated driving and testing of terminal-based programs. It is handy for testing interactive programs which have a prompt, and is based on the same concepts as the Tcl Expect tool. As in Expect::Simple, the Expect object is made available for tweaking. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 13 23:32:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 19:32:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191623] Review Request: perl-Expect-Simple - Wrapper around the Expect module In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605132332.k4DNWcMZ012044@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Expect-Simple - Wrapper around the Expect module https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191623 jpo at di.uminho.pt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |191622 OtherBugsDependingO| |191624 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 13 23:32:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 19:32:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191624] Review Request: perl-Test-Expect - Automated driving and testing of terminal-based programs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605132332.k4DNWnil012130@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-Expect - Automated driving and testing of terminal-based programs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191624 jpo at di.uminho.pt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |191623 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 13 23:33:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 19:33:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191622] Review Request: perl-Expect - Expect for Perl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605132333.k4DNX1Wt012237@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Expect - Expect for Perl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191622 jpo at di.uminho.pt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |191623 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 13 23:44:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 19:44:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177105] Review Request: gnomeradio - Graphical FM-Tuner program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605132344.k4DNivNu014939@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnomeradio - Graphical FM-Tuner program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177105 bugs.michael at gmx.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO_REPORTER ------- Additional Comments From bugs.michael at gmx.net 2006-05-13 19:44 EST ------- *ping* -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 13 23:50:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 19:50:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190040] Review Request: hydrogen - Advanced drum machine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605132350.k4DNox5P015813@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hydrogen - Advanced drum machine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190040 ------- Additional Comments From green at redhat.com 2006-05-13 19:50 EST ------- Thanks for the review. Updated bits here... Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/green/FE/FC5/hydrogen.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/green/FE/FC5/hydrogen-0.9.3-4.src.rpm (In reply to comment #3) > [wrt 0.9.3-2] > > * FE-NEEDSPONSOR blocker bug is for new contributors who don't have CVS > access yet. You don't belong to that group anymore. Ah.. I thought sponsorship applied to packages, not people. Thanks for clearing this up. > * Fails to build (FC5), due to a hardcoded -lxml2 in configure{.in}. > > /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lxml2 > collect2: ld returned 1 exit status > > Missing: BuildRequires: libxml2-devel Fixed. > * From the build log: > > | --- Checking for PortAudio ------------------------------------- > | checking whether PORTAUDIOPATH environment variable is set... > | PORTAUDIOPATH is not set. No PortAudio support. > | ----------------------------------------------------------------- > > PortAudio is available in Extras. Should it be enabled? No, I don't think so. jack is the audio driver of choice for these kinds of apps. > * rpmlint hydrogen-0.9.3-2.i386.rpm > E: hydrogen shared-lib-without-dependency-information > /usr/lib/hydrogen/plugins/wasp_noisifier.so > E: hydrogen shared-lib-without-dependency-information > /usr/lib/hydrogen/plugins/wasp_booster.so > E: hydrogen shared-lib-without-dependency-information > /usr/lib/hydrogen/plugins/wasp_xshaper.so > E: hydrogen script-without-shellbang /usr/share/applications/hydrogen.desktop > > The first three are safe to ignore. The latter is not. .desktop file is > executable. The review guidelines say it must be installed with > desktop-file-install. Fixed. I've also added related post and postun scripts. > * The explicit Requires on package names are not good. Kill them and > rely on rpmbuild's automatic dependencies on SONAMES. Fixed. > * The hardcoded Qt version is not good. Source /etc/profile.d/qt.sh > which sets QTDIR correctly. Further, since many Qt configure checks > fail due to multilib locations, set QTLIB/QTINC like this: Cool. Fixed. Thanks for spending time on this! AG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 13 23:54:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 19:54:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 176374] Review Request: nagios-plugins In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605132354.k4DNs9sh016449@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nagios-plugins https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176374 ------- Additional Comments From imlinux at gmail.com 2006-05-13 19:53 EST ------- Comment #26: Yes the only reason I'm not packaging the check_if's is because Net::SNMP isn't in there, I was going to package it after nagios-plugins got approved but if you want to package it have at it :-D As far as the individual plugin requires... it was a pain in the butt but I think I got all the requires that rpm doesn't pick up: SPEC: http://mmcgrath.net/~mmcgrath/nagios/nagios.spec SRPM: http://mmcgrath.net/~mmcgrath/nagios/nagios-plugins-1.4.3-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 14 00:32:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 20:32:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191628] New: Review Request: perl-Net-SNMP - Object oriented interface to SNMP Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191628 Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-SNMP - Object oriented interface to SNMP Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: jpo at di.uminho.pt QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://gsd.di.uminho.pt/jpo/software/fedora/perl-Net-SNMP.spec SRPM URL: http://gsd.di.uminho.pt/jpo/software/fedora/perl-Net-SNMP-5.2.0-1.src.rpm Description: The Net::SNMP module implements an object oriented interface to the Simple Network Management Protocol. Perl applications can use the module to retrieve or update information on a remote host using the SNMP protocol. The module supports SNMP version-1, SNMP version-2c (Community-Based SNMPv2), and SNMP version-3. The Net::SNMP module assumes that the user has a basic understanding of the Simple Network Management Protocol and related network management concepts. Note to reviewers: 1 -This module can have extended functionality by requiring the optional modules Crypt::Rijndael and Socket6. I have both of them packaged here http://gsd.di.uminho.pt/jpo/software/fedora/ but I am unsure of the Socket6 license and if the crypt module builds in 64bit archs. 2 - This module is needed by nagios-plugins -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 14 00:36:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 20:36:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 176374] Review Request: nagios-plugins In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605140036.k4E0a3m2023539@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nagios-plugins https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176374 ------- Additional Comments From jpo at di.uminho.pt 2006-05-13 20:35 EST ------- (In reply to comment #27) > Comment #26: Yes the only reason I'm not packaging the check_if's is because > Net::SNMP isn't in there, I was going to package it after nagios-plugins got > approved but if you want to package it have at it :-D perl-Net-SNMP review ticket: #191628 ;) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 14 00:41:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 20:41:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188180] Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605140041.k4E0fJhJ024782@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188180 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |kevin at tummy.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-05-13 20:41 EST ------- Since Laurent isn't in fedorabugs group yet, I am happy to "officially" review this package. ;) (I'm running thru my full checklist even tho many of these were checked above) See below - Rpmlint output. OK - Package name. OK - Spec file name matches. - Package guidelines. OK - Licsense. (GPL/QPL) OK - License field matches in spec. OK - License included in files OK - Spec in american english OK - Spec legible OK - Md5sum of source from upstream 18bca010d09b98e94210710047baca0a qt-x11-opensource-src-4.1.2.tar.gz 18bca010d09b98e94210710047baca0a qt-x11-opensource-src-4.1.2.tar.gz.1 OK - Compiles and builds on one arch at least. (builds in mock on fc5, devel is broken currently) OK - No Forbidden buildrequires included OK - All required buildrequires included OK - Ldconfig in post/postun if including libs. OK - Owns all directories it creates. OK - No duplicate files in %files listing. OK - Permissions on files correct. OK - Clean section correct. OK - Macros consistant. OK - Code not content. OK - Docs subpackage needed for large documentations. OK - Docs must not affect runtime. OK - Header files/libs in a devel package. OK - Pkgconfig (.pc) files in devel package. OK - .so files in devel package. OK - Devel package requires base package. OK - No .la files. OK - .desktop file if a GUI app OK - Doesn't own any files/dirs that are already owned by others. SHOULD Items: OK - Subpackages require base package. OK - builds in mock (fc5 at least). Issues found: 1. There are some commented out items in the spec, if they aren't used it might be good to just remove them: #define x_deps XFree86-devel XFree86-Mesa-libGL XFree86-Mesa-libGLU ... #rm -f %{buildroot}%{qtdir}/mkspecs/default/linux-g++* ... #config /etc/profile.d/* ... 2. Do you need the /etc/ld.so.conf.d in Requires(pre) and Requires(post)? Thats provided by glibc, which I would expect is always present in the base os... 3. What does this comment refer to? # Not sure how to use, where to put this, yet -- Rex 4. Does everything build as expected under x86_64 and ppc? I don't have either of those arch'es here, might be good to test if someone could do some quick mockbuilds, especially since you are directly doing some tests that would affect things on x86_64 at least. 5. You have calls to a %debug variable in the build. Perhaps comment that at the top of the spec in case someone wants to use it? or just remove it if it's never used. 6. Are static (.a) libs wanted/used by anyone? (There are 2 in -devel) 7. Current rpmlint output has a few things in it. E: qt4 script-without-shellbang /usr/lib/qt4/LICENSE.GPL E: qt4 script-without-shellbang /usr/lib/qt4/LICENSE.QPL Suggest: change permissions to 644 ? E: qt4 configure-without-libdir-spec Suggest: adding '--libdir=%{_libdir}' to ./configure call E: qt4-designer devel-dependency qt4-devel E: qt4-docs devel-dependency qt4-devel Should designer and docs require devel? There are about a zillion of these (ok, only 6008) : W: qt4-docs doc-file-dependency /usr/lib/qt4/examples/draganddrop/fridgemagnets/fridgemagnets libgcc_s.so.1 Suggest: make examples/demos not %doc. Possibly split them all out into a qt4-examples and/or qt4-demos ? People typically don't expect doc packages to have lots of requires. E: qt4-devel script-without-shellbang /usr/lib/qt4/mkspecs/macx-pbuilder/qmake.conf E: qt4-devel script-without-shellbang /usr/lib/qt4/mkspecs/macx-pbuilder/Info.plist.app Suggest: change perms to 644 on those files? 8. Are there no man pages? I don't see any in any of the packages, comment #2 and #3 makes mention of them. Starting to look close. ;) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 14 01:14:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 21:14:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188180] Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605140114.k4E1ELrh030131@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188180 ------- Additional Comments From laurent.rineau__fc_extra at normalesup.org 2006-05-13 21:14 EST ------- (In reply to comment #42) > 4. Does everything build as expected under x86_64 and ppc? > I don't have either of those arch'es here, might be good to test > if someone could do some quick mockbuilds, especially since you > are directly doing some tests that would affect things on x86_64 at least. I do not use mock (because it seems to takes hours), but a standard build runs correctly on my machine, AMD Turion, with fc5. The package goes to /usr/lib64/qt4 as expected. And there is a symlink /usr/lib64/qt4/lib64 -> lib > 6. Are static (.a) libs wanted/used by anyone? > (There are 2 in -devel) libQtUiTool is used in the example at: http://doc.trolltech.com/4.1/designer-calculatorbuilder.html It is mandatory for the module QtUiTools of Qt-4: http://doc.trolltech.com/4.1/qtuitools.html libAssistantClient is for the Assistant module: http://doc.trolltech.com/4.1/qtassistant.html Maybe these two minors libs are too new in Qt, and developers didn't want to freeze them (all qt-4 versions are supposed to be binary and source compatible). > E: qt4 configure-without-libdir-spec > > Suggest: adding '--libdir=%{_libdir}' to ./configure call Qt's configure is not a GNU configure. The option --libdir does not exists. However, -libdir (one slash) exists. (Please to see this bug assigned! Hint: three requests depend on qt4, and one of them is mine...) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 14 01:38:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 21:38:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188180] Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605140138.k4E1cuVM001994@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188180 ------- Additional Comments From laurent.rineau__fc_extra at normalesup.org 2006-05-13 21:38 EST ------- A warning, at the very end of the build: + desktop-file-install --vendor=qt --dir /var/tmp/qt4-4.1.2-13-root-rineau/usr/share/applications --add-category=X-Fedora /home/rineau/RPM/SOURCES/designer4.desktop /var/tmp/qt4-4.1.2-13-root-rineau/usr/share/applications/qt-designer4.desktop: warning: file contains key "MapNotify", usage of this key is not recommended, since it has been deprecated -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 14 01:40:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 21:40:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 186887] Review Request: libnetfilter_conntrack - Netfilter conntrack userspace library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605140140.k4E1eA98002252@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libnetfilter_conntrack - Netfilter conntrack userspace library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=186887 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |kevin at tummy.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-05-13 21:40 EST ------- In answer to comment #2: Each package must go through a review. ;) And here is one for this package: See below - Rpmlint output. OK - Package name. OK - Spec file name matches. OK - Package guidelines. OK - Licsense. OK - License field matches in spec. OK - License included in files OK - Spec in american english OK - Spec legible OK - Md5sum of source from upstream e07f3d159a869900fbf23f5df12aaf3e libnetfilter_conntrack-0.0.30.tar.bz2 e07f3d159a869900fbf23f5df12aaf3e libnetfilter_conntrack-0.0.30.tar.bz2.1 OK - Compiles and builds on one arch at least. (builds in mock on fc5) OK - Excludearch not needed OK - Forbidden buildrequires not included OK - All required buildrequires included OK - Ldconfig in post/postun if including libs. OK - Owns all directories it creates. OK - No duplicate files in %files listing. OK - Permissions on files correct. OK - Clean section correct. OK - Macros consistant. OK - Code not content. OK - Docs must not affect runtime. OK - Header files/libs in a devel package. OK - .so files in devel package. OK - Devel package requires base package. OK - No .la files. OK - Doesn't own any files/dirs that are already owned by others. 1. One rpmlint warning: W: libnetfilter_conntrack-devel summary-not-capitalized netfilter conntrack userspace library Suggest: Change the devel summary to "Netfilter conntrack userspace library development files" Looks good. If you could fix up the rpmlint warning when you import into CVS that would be great. This package is APPROVED. Don't forget to close this bug when you have imported and built the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 14 01:49:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 21:49:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188180] Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605140149.k4E1n7e2004130@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188180 ------- Additional Comments From laurent.rineau__fc_extra at normalesup.org 2006-05-13 21:48 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=128986) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=128986&action=view) Small to to qt4-4.1.2-13.spec Yet another remark (sorry for the spam): to be coherent, you should apply the patch attached. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 14 01:51:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 21:51:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188180] Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605140151.k4E1pY9R004552@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188180 laurent.rineau__fc_extra at normalesup.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #128986|Small to to qt4-4.1.2- |Small patch to qt4-4.1.2- description|13.spec |13.spec ------- Additional Comments From laurent.rineau__fc_extra at normalesup.org 2006-05-13 21:51 EST ------- (From update of attachment 128986) typo (Need to sleep. 4:00am at Paris. See you tomorrow.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 14 01:59:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 21:59:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 186892] Review Request: conntrack - Tool to manipulate netfilter connection tracking table In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605140159.k4E1xtRZ005920@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: conntrack - Tool to manipulate netfilter connection tracking table https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=186892 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |kevin at tummy.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-05-13 21:59 EST ------- Greetings. I'm happy to review this package as well. Before a full review however: 1. You seem to have updated to the latest upstream version (1.00beta1), but didn't increment the version in the spec/src.rpm. Could you generate a new spec and src.rpm with the current version in place? 2. libnfnetlink seems to only be available in devel currently. Do you plan to add that (and libnetfilter_conntrack and conntrack) to fc5 as well? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 14 02:12:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 22:12:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187609] Review Request: tre - POSIX compatible regexp library with approximate matching In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605140212.k4E2CgOp007829@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tre - POSIX compatible regexp library with approximate matching https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187609 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|fedora-extras- |fedora-package- |list at redhat.com |review at redhat.com kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |kevin at tummy.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-05-13 22:12 EST ------- Greetings. I plan on reviewing this package... before I do the full review however, it appears that upstream has released a new version (0.7.3) and changed the license to LGPL. Can you update to the new version and change the license tag in the spec? You may also consider (not a requirement or blocker) using a dist tag in your package, see: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/DistTag I'll wait for the new version to do a full review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 14 02:13:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 22:13:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187610] Review Request: crm114 - CRM114 Bayesian Spam Detector In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605140213.k4E2D6WW007978@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: crm114 - CRM114 Bayesian Spam Detector https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187610 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|fedora-extras- |fedora-package- |list at redhat.com |review at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 14 02:57:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 22:57:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189884] Review Request: LASH Audio Session Handler In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605140257.k4E2vHfi015805@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: LASH Audio Session Handler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189884 green at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 14 03:13:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 23:13:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188180] Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605140313.k4E3DCf5018442@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188180 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-05-13 23:13 EST ------- Re: comment #46. I don't see the need for this patch. Logically, it is the same with or without it. Re: comment 44 I'll remove MapNotify. Re: comment 42 > 2. Do you need the /etc/ld.so.conf.d in Requires(pre) and Requires(post)? Technically, yes, it guarantees correct install order (say, during an initial install). In practice, it's unlikely that not having it would ever cause problems. > 3. What does this comment refer to? > # Not sure how to use, where to put this, yet -- Rex The item right below it: Source1: qt.conf The qt documentation mentions the use of qt.conf to set qt options, and I'd like to be able to set some global ones, but it wasn't clear to me where to put it. > Should designer and docs require devel? Yes, they're both addons to the base development install. qt(3)'s -designer is the same, and the docs used to be in -devel, but I've split them off. > 8. Are there no man pages? Nope. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 14 03:15:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 23:15:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188180] Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605140315.k4E3F4RI018724@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188180 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-05-13 23:14 EST ------- Spec Name or Url: http://kde-redhat.unl.edu/apt/kde-redhat/SPECS/qt4-4.1.2-14.spec SRPM Name or Url: http://kde-redhat.unl.edu/apt/kde-redhat/all/SRPMS.stable/qt4-4.1.2-14.src.rpm %changelog * Sat May 14 2006 Rex Dieter 4.1.2-14 - remove MapNotify from .desktop file(s). - install -m644 LICENSE.* - docs: don't mark examples as %doc - drop unused %%debug macro -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 14 03:22:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 23:22:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191594] Review Request: gtkglextmm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605140322.k4E3MwO2019954@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtkglextmm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191594 rc040203 at freenet.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |163776 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 14 03:32:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 23:32:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189313] Review Request: liblrdf In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605140332.k4E3WgCl021713@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: liblrdf https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189313 green at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From green at redhat.com 2006-05-13 23:32 EST ------- (In reply to comment #6) > (Do we have any ladspa package in the queue which comes > with an rdf file?) swh-plugins does, and it's already in Extras. I've also submitted CAPS, which does as well. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190045 > APPROVED if you fix that remaining issue. Done. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 14 03:32:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 23:32:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189315] Review Request: ardour In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605140332.k4E3Wk2U021751@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ardour https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189315 Bug 189315 depends on bug 189313, which changed state. Bug 189313 Summary: Review Request: liblrdf https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189313 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 14 03:33:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 23:33:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190040] Review Request: hydrogen - Advanced drum machine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605140333.k4E3XJMK021955@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hydrogen - Advanced drum machine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190040 Bug 190040 depends on bug 189313, which changed state. Bug 189313 Summary: Review Request: liblrdf https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189313 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 14 03:33:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 23:33:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190045] Review Request: caps - A set of audio plugins for LADSPA In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605140333.k4E3XkDX022088@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: caps - A set of audio plugins for LADSPA https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190045 green at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 14 03:35:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 23:35:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189315] Review Request: ardour In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605140335.k4E3ZuqR022568@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ardour https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189315 green at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 14 03:36:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 23:36:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189886] Review Request: FluidSynth - Real-time software synthesizer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605140336.k4E3aFHO022619@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: FluidSynth - Real-time software synthesizer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189886 green at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 14 03:36:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 23:36:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189892] Review Request: dssi - Disposable Soft Synth Interface In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605140336.k4E3akiu022810@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dssi - Disposable Soft Synth Interface https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189892 green at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 14 03:36:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 23:36:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189889] Review Request: vkeybd - Virtual MIDI Keyboard In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605140336.k4E3ahsc022783@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vkeybd - Virtual MIDI Keyboard https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189889 green at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 14 03:37:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 23:37:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190027] Review Request: hexter-dssi - DSSI software synthesizer plugin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605140337.k4E3bM6B023040@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hexter-dssi - DSSI software synthesizer plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190027 green at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 14 03:37:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 23:37:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190029] Review Request: whysynth-dssi - DSSI software synthesizer plugin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605140337.k4E3bXux023161@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: whysynth-dssi - DSSI software synthesizer plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190029 green at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 14 03:37:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 23:37:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191590] Review Request: fluidsynth-dssi - a FluidSynth DSSI plugin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605140337.k4E3bppk023241@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fluidsynth-dssi - a FluidSynth DSSI plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191590 green at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 14 03:45:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 23:45:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191594] Review Request: gtkglextmm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605140345.k4E3j68f024775@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtkglextmm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191594 rc040203 at freenet.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |rc040203 at freenet.de OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2006-05-13 23:44 EST ------- Some comments: * The spec "BuildRequires: gtkext >= 1.2.0". AFAICT, 1.0.0 should be sufficient. At least, I am not aware about any API changes between GtkGlExt-1.0.0 and 1.2.0 making this requirement necessary. A fact confirming this, is gtkglextmm's configure script to only check for gtkglext >= 1.0.0. * The spec explicitly Requires: gtkglext Requires: gtkmm24 This shouldn't be necessary. * Please explain /usr/lib/gtkglextmm-1.2/proc/m4/* I don't know what these files are (Look like some m4 macros to help converting some types), how they are supposed to be used and why they need to be shipped. AFAIS, they don't they seem to be used by anything in gtkglextmm. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 14 03:57:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 23:57:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190664] Review Request: keyutils - Kernel key management userspace utilities In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605140357.k4E3vkgW026693@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: keyutils - Kernel key management userspace utilities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190664 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2006-05-13 23:57 EST ------- (In reply to comment #9) > If the static library is dropped, this package should be fine. Ralf? Well, I don't know. The OP claimed there were technical requirements to ship the static libs. So, from my (package review focused) perspective, a minimum requirement to proceed would be him to either drop the static libs or to prove the necessity of includeing them. I.e. yes, dropping the static lib would remove one road blocker. The other issue (shared library names) is my personal preference (I consider "Drepper-style" library naming useless featuritis), which will cause me not approve a package. But it's not a technical problem, which should prevent others from approving a package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 14 06:13:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 May 2006 02:13:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189656] Review Request: lilypond - A typesetting system for music notation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605140613.k4E6D3D7016382@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lilypond - A typesetting system for music notation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189656 ------- Additional Comments From qspencer at ieee.org 2006-05-14 02:12 EST ------- I finally tracked down the problem. The segfaults happen when trying to create a font cache in a file in ~/.rh-fontconfig/ . If the directory is present, it doesn't fail, but if it is not present, it tries to write to the file in the directory, resulting in a crash. There is a new release of lilypond which appears to avoid this problem. I have built it in FC-5 having removed the font directory, but haven't tried mock yet. New spec and SRPM: http://webpages.charter.net/qspencer/rpm/lilypond-2.8.2-1.src.rpm http://webpages.charter.net/qspencer/rpm/lilypond.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 14 06:26:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 May 2006 02:26:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191592] Review Request: vorbisgain - Adds tags to Ogg Vorbis files to adjust the volume In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605140626.k4E6QUb2018285@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vorbisgain - Adds tags to Ogg Vorbis files to adjust the volume https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191592 ------- Additional Comments From noa at resare.com 2006-05-14 02:26 EST ------- Thanks! My account name is 'noa' -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 14 07:03:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 May 2006 03:03:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188180] Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605140703.k4E73xZI025400@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188180 ------- Additional Comments From frank-buettner at gmx.net 2006-05-14 03:03 EST ------- So I have an lite modification for your spec file to safe mutch compiling time. Because the examples are not compiled. replay make .. with this: make %{?_smp_mflags} sub-src make %{?_smp_mflags} sub-tools make INSTALL_ROOT=%{buildroot} sub-src-install_subtargets make INSTALL_ROOT=%{buildroot} sub-tools-install_subtargets make INSTALL_ROOT=%{buildroot} install_htmldocs make INSTALL_ROOT=%{buildroot} install_qmake make INSTALL_ROOT=%{buildroot} install_mkspecs make INSTALL_ROOT=%{buildroot} install_translations -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 14 09:10:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 May 2006 05:10:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190997] Review Request: linux-wlan-ng In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605140910.k4E9AiIZ004573@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: linux-wlan-ng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190997 ------- Additional Comments From r.garth at uws.edu.au 2006-05-14 05:10 EST ------- Thankyou! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 14 10:41:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 May 2006 06:41:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188180] Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605141041.k4EAfrRO022063@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188180 ------- Additional Comments From laurent.rineau__fc_extra at normalesup.org 2006-05-14 06:41 EST ------- (In reply to comment #47) > Re: comment #46. > I don't see the need for this patch. Logically, it is the same with or without it. If %{_lib} can only have to two values "lib" or "lib64", I?agree. But perhaps one day an arch will have another value. "multilib", for example (if the multilib feature of MacOS-X comes to other OS). Actually, it is really a very minor issue. I do not really care. :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 14 10:45:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 May 2006 06:45:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188180] Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605141045.k4EAjWOv022918@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188180 ------- Additional Comments From frank-buettner at gmx.net 2006-05-14 06:45 EST ------- # drop -fexceptions from $RPM_OPT_FLAGS RPM_OPT_FLAGS=`echo $RPM_OPT_FLAGS | sed 's|-fexceptions||g'` # use $RPM_OPT_FLAGS sed -i -e "s|-O2|$RPM_OPT_FLAGS|g" mkspecs/*/qmake.conf Is not good. Better only change the flag for compiler file for the gcc. And add an menu entry for the linguist tool. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 14 10:57:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 May 2006 06:57:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188180] Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605141057.k4EAvHGF024981@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188180 ------- Additional Comments From laurent.rineau__fc_extra at normalesup.org 2006-05-14 06:57 EST ------- 4.1.2-14 does not build: + -shared -no-exceptions -largefile -qt-gif -system-zlib -system-libpng -system-libjpeg -plugin-sql-mysql -I/usr/include/mysql -L/usr/lib64/mysql -plugin-sql-psql -plugin-sql-odbc -plugin-sql-sqlite -cups -sm -stl -xcursor -xinerama -xshape -xrandr -xrender -xkb -fontconfig -tablet /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.66860: line 51: -shared: command not found error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.66860 (%build) :-( @@ -171,7 +171,7 @@ %else -platform linux-g++ \ %endif - -release + -release \ -shared \ -no-exceptions \ -largefile \ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 14 11:11:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 May 2006 07:11:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188180] Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605141111.k4EBBHJF027246@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188180 ------- Additional Comments From frank-buettner at gmx.net 2006-05-14 07:11 EST ------- missing \ after -release -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 14 11:38:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 May 2006 07:38:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190471] Review Request: yakuake - Quake-style terminal emulator for KDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605141138.k4EBcWr6032244@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: yakuake - Quake-style terminal emulator for KDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190471 gajownik at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |186283 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 14 12:22:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 May 2006 08:22:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190997] Review Request: linux-wlan-ng In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605141222.k4ECMBRd006667@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: linux-wlan-ng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190997 ------- Additional Comments From r.garth at uws.edu.au 2006-05-14 08:21 EST ------- The spec file for the kmod is harcoded to an old kernel version. Needs to be changed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 14 12:49:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 May 2006 08:49:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 178900] Review Request: monodoc In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605141249.k4ECnrZ2012108@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: monodoc https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=178900 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-05-14 08:49 EST ------- Spec Name or Url: http://www.smmp.salford.ac.uk/packages/monodoc.spec SRPM Name or Url: http://www.smmp.salford.ac.uk/packages/monodoc-1.1.13-6.src.rpm Fixes as suggested -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 14 13:16:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 May 2006 09:16:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188180] Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605141316.k4EDGp7x016094@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188180 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-05-14 09:16 EST ------- Re: comment #51 > Is not good. Better only change the flag for compiler file for the gcc. Why do you say that? If not, any qt app that uses qmake won't get $RPM_OPT_FLAGS. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 14 13:55:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 May 2006 09:55:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191592] Review Request: vorbisgain - Adds tags to Ogg Vorbis files to adjust the volume In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605141355.k4EDtCAL023024@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vorbisgain - Adds tags to Ogg Vorbis files to adjust the volume https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191592 ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at ameritech.net 2006-05-14 09:55 EST ------- I've gone ahead and approved you. Once this goes thru the system, you should be able to go to the next step. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/Contributors#head-0956b12959af46cfe0aa12d09ed15e573bfd9ef4 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 14 14:27:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 May 2006 10:27:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188180] Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605141427.k4EERHSw027699@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188180 ------- Additional Comments From frank-buettner at gmx.net 2006-05-14 10:27 EST ------- qmake wil only look at this 3 files when using the gcc mkspecs/linux-g++/qmake.conf mkspecs/linux-g++-32/qmake.conf mkspecs/linux-g++-64/qmake.conf But with your code you will change the lines for the other compiler to. And the $RPM_OPT_FLAGS are only for the gcc. And not for example for the icc. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 14 14:58:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 May 2006 10:58:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189268] Review Request: xscreensaver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605141458.k4EEws99001642@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xscreensaver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189268 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-05-14 10:58 EST ------- Well, I again read http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/Contributors, created my fedora account and requested to add myself to cvsextras group. I received the e-mail that "Fedora user mtasaka, aka Mamoru Tasaka has requested membership in the cvsextras group and needs a sponsor". My current status about cvsextras group is "role type: user" "role status: unapproved" "Sponsor: none". Can I expect that someone changes this status? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 14 15:29:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 May 2006 11:29:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191358] Review Request: python-mechanize - Stateful programmatic web browsing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605141529.k4EFTjpp006444@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-mechanize - Stateful programmatic web browsing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191358 gauret at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |gauret at free.fr OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From gauret at free.fr 2006-05-14 11:29 EST ------- Needs work: * The package cannot be noarch since it installs files to %{_libdir} * Missing from python spec template: Requires: python-abi = %(%{__python} -c "import sys ; print sys.version[:3]") -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 14 16:22:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 May 2006 12:22:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190066] Review Request: php-pear-Mail In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605141622.k4EGMYrp015920@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Mail https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190066 ------- Additional Comments From gauret at free.fr 2006-05-14 12:22 EST ------- If you need php-pear >= 1:1.4.9 (for the .pkgxml dir), you need to reflect that in the Requires tag. Everything else looks OK. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 14 16:49:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 May 2006 12:49:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 186892] Review Request: conntrack - Tool to manipulate netfilter connection tracking table In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605141649.k4EGn0Mo021291@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: conntrack - Tool to manipulate netfilter connection tracking table https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=186892 Bug 186892 depends on bug 186887, which changed state. Bug 186887 Summary: Review Request: libnetfilter_conntrack - Netfilter conntrack userspace library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=186887 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 14 16:48:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 May 2006 12:48:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 186887] Review Request: libnetfilter_conntrack - Netfilter conntrack userspace library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605141648.k4EGmnA5021271@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libnetfilter_conntrack - Netfilter conntrack userspace library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=186887 i at stingr.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 14 17:01:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 May 2006 13:01:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190997] Review Request: linux-wlan-ng In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605141701.k4EH1Jdt023198@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: linux-wlan-ng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190997 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at leemhuis.info 2006-05-14 13:01 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=129010) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=129010&action=view) adjust kmod-package to kmod standard (In reply to comment #2) > These packages start to use the system mentioned in Comment #1. Attached patch (quick hack -- I left also a fixme for you) will bring it more in line with the kmod-standard > However, I am not clear on some of the documentation. I'm working on it currently (and needed a package to look at it closer again -- that's why I created the patch) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 14 17:23:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 May 2006 13:23:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191452] Review Request: orpie - scientific calculator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605141723.k4EHNITq026919@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: orpie - scientific calculator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191452 gauret at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |gauret at free.fr OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From gauret at free.fr 2006-05-14 13:22 EST ------- Needs work: "Requires: ncurses" is useless, it's picked-up by RPM (libncurses.so.5) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 14 17:36:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 May 2006 13:36:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191452] Review Request: orpie - scientific calculator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605141736.k4EHaWns029010@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: orpie - scientific calculator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191452 ------- Additional Comments From lists at forevermore.net 2006-05-14 13:36 EST ------- fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 14 18:05:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 May 2006 14:05:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187266] Review Request: gprolog - GNU Prolog is a free Prolog compiler In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605141805.k4EI5Y3N001002@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gprolog - GNU Prolog is a free Prolog compiler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187266 ------- Additional Comments From Jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2006-05-14 14:05 EST ------- I have revert to: SPEC: http://www.herr-schmitt.de/pub/gprolog/gprolog.spec SRPM: http://www.herr-schmitt.de/pub/gprolog/gprolog-1.2.19-4.src.rpm Please approve the package or tell me, waht I have to do to get the package aprove. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 14 18:25:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 May 2006 14:25:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191358] Review Request: python-mechanize - Stateful programmatic web browsing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605141825.k4EIP71s005291@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-mechanize - Stateful programmatic web browsing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191358 ------- Additional Comments From lmacken at redhat.com 2006-05-14 14:24 EST ------- Thanks, fixed. http://people.redhat.com/lmacken/python-mechanize.spec http://people.redhat.com/lmacken/python-mechanize-0.1.1a-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 14 18:31:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 May 2006 14:31:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191452] Review Request: orpie - scientific calculator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605141831.k4EIVdJR006898@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: orpie - scientific calculator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191452 gauret at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From gauret at free.fr 2006-05-14 14:31 EST ------- Review for release 1: * RPM name is OK * Source orpie-1.4.3.tar.gz is the same as upstream * This is the latest version * Builds fine in mock * rpmlint looks OK * File list looks OK * Works fine Minor: * Duplicate BuildRequires: ocaml (by camlp4) Notes: Always increment the release tag when you change something in the package, even during the review process. It makes it easier to know what has been approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 14 18:42:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 May 2006 14:42:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189891] Review Request: liblo - Open Sound Control library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605141842.k4EIgSOj010185@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: liblo - Open Sound Control library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189891 Jochen at herr-schmitt.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From Jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2006-05-14 14:42 EST ------- I'm happy to inform you, that your package is approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 14 18:43:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 May 2006 14:43:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191594] Review Request: gtkglextmm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605141843.k4EIhqZu010705@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtkglextmm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191594 ------- Additional Comments From gilles.gagniard at gmail.com 2006-05-14 14:43 EST ------- Alright, I reuploaded a new version of the spec. > * The spec "BuildRequires: gtkext >= 1.2.0". > AFAICT, 1.0.0 should be sufficient. At least, I am not aware about any API > changes between GtkGlExt-1.0.0 and 1.2.0 making this requirement necessary. > A fact confirming this, is gtkglextmm's configure script to only check for > gtkglext >= 1.0.0. Yup, you're right. As both of these packages have been released almost together, I thought that it was necessary ;) > * The spec explicitly > Requires: gtkglext > Requires: gtkmm24 > This shouldn't be necessary. Ok, I removed them. But for my personal education, could you explain me why ? It is the first rpm spec I write, I only have a previous experience with gentoo ebuilds ... Is it because rpm added automatically a dependency on the *librairies* in the gtkglext package by checking undefined symbols ? > * Please explain /usr/lib/gtkglextmm-1.2/proc/m4/* > I don't know what these files are (Look like some m4 macros to help converting > some types), how they are supposed to be used and why they need to be shipped. > AFAIS, they don't they seem to be used by anything in gtkglextmm. Well, I use this library as an app developper, and I don't need these files either. However, directly from the README file in the source package in tools/m4 : "This directory contains additional type conversions for gtkglextmm. The convert.m4 file overrides the file of the same name in gtkmm. Like the gtkmm m4 conversion files, these files are also installed, for use by other libraries." So I guess some people have a use for it ... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 14 19:23:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 May 2006 15:23:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 186892] Review Request: conntrack - Tool to manipulate netfilter connection tracking table In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605141923.k4EJN28V018878@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: conntrack - Tool to manipulate netfilter connection tracking table https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=186892 ------- Additional Comments From i at stingr.net 2006-05-14 15:23 EST ------- 1. I'm not sure that (version = 1.0 and release = beta1) will be less than (version = 1.0 and release = 1) so I just did what gcc and others do - various pre- versions are just x.99 2. Of course. After I add this package I'll request it for fc5 and fc4. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 14 19:54:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 May 2006 15:54:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189263] Review Request: rsibreak In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605141954.k4EJsY0x024700@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rsibreak https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189263 jpmahowald at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |jpmahowald at gmail.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2006-05-14 15:54 EST ------- - rpmlint checks return clean - package meets naming guidelines - package meets packaging guidelines - license (GPL) OK, text in %doc, matches source - spec file legible, in am. english - source matches upstream - package compiles on FC5 (x86_64) - no missing BR - no unnecessary BR - locales handled properly - not relocatable - owns all directories that it creates - no duplicate files - permissions ok - %clean ok - macro use consistent - code, not content - no need for -docs - nothing in %doc affects runtime - .desktop file There really is not a much better rpm group. APPROVED I'll sponsor if still needed, apply for cvsextras. Note that when the package builds you can inform the rsibreak authors about the Extras package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 14 20:09:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 May 2006 16:09:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 186892] Review Request: conntrack - Tool to manipulate netfilter connection tracking table In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605142009.k4EK9AEk026882@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: conntrack - Tool to manipulate netfilter connection tracking table https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=186892 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-05-14 16:09 EST ------- In reply to comment #4: 1. Ah, yeah... take a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#NonNumericRelease Which would I think suggest: conntrack-1.0-0.1.beta1 ? Then, the final should be newer than any of the 0.X.beta1 series... I think that method prevents confusion about just what version is in the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 14 20:21:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 May 2006 16:21:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187266] Review Request: gprolog - GNU Prolog is a free Prolog compiler In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605142021.k4EKLjQV028813@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gprolog - GNU Prolog is a free Prolog compiler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187266 gemi at bluewin.ch changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From gemi at bluewin.ch 2006-05-14 16:21 EST ------- It seems to me that the pdf files compil-scheme.pdf and debug-box.pdf should not be included in the docs, since they are graphics that are already included in the manual. Otherwise seems good to me. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 14 20:29:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 May 2006 16:29:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191358] Review Request: python-mechanize - Stateful programmatic web browsing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605142029.k4EKTroM030283@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-mechanize - Stateful programmatic web browsing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191358 gauret at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From gauret at free.fr 2006-05-14 16:29 EST ------- Review for release 2: * RPM name is OK * Source mechanize-0.1.1a.tar.gz is the same as upstream * It is the latest version (checked with the included example :) ) * Builds fine in mock * rpmlint looks OK * File list looks OK * Works fine (tested with the included examples) APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 14 20:49:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 May 2006 16:49:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191667] New: Review Request: poker-engine - Python library that implements poker rules Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191667 Summary: Review Request: poker-engine - Python library that implements poker rules Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: chris.stone at gmail.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://tkmame.retrogames.com/fedora-extras/poker-engine.spec SRPM URL: http://tkmame.retrogames.com/fedora-extras/poker-engine-1.0.14-2.src.rpm *** NOTE *** You may have to download the src.rpm from http://tkmame.retrogames.com/fedora-extras/ Description: This is a python library that implements poker rules according to variants and betting structures specified in configuration files. It designed to be used by a multiplayer poker server, a poker AI or a poker client. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 14 20:50:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 May 2006 16:50:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177818] Review Request: adplug In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605142050.k4EKoA6T002355@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: adplug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177818 jpmahowald at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |jpmahowald at gmail.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2006-05-14 16:49 EST ------- - rpmlint checks return: E: adplug binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/adplugdb ['/usr/lib64'] try passing --disable-rpath to configure - package meets naming guidelines - package meets packaging guidelines - license (LGPL) OK, text in %doc, matches source - spec file legible, in am. english - source matches upstream - package compiles on FC5 (x86_64) - no missing BR - no unnecessary BR - no locales - not relocatable - owns all directories that it creates - no duplicate files - permissions ok - %clean ok - macro use consistent - code, not content - no need for -docs - nothing in %doc affects runtime - no need for .desktop file - devel package ok - no .la files - post/postun ldconfig ok - devel requires base package n-v-r - db in /var/lib/adplug APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 14 20:57:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 May 2006 16:57:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189322] Review Request: rosegarden4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605142057.k4EKvNk2003437@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rosegarden4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189322 seg at haxxed.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |183912 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 14 20:57:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 May 2006 16:57:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 183912] Review Request: jack-audio-connection-kit - The Jack Audio Connection Kit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605142057.k4EKvkS0003540@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jack-audio-connection-kit - The Jack Audio Connection Kit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183912 seg at haxxed.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |189322 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 14 21:08:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 May 2006 17:08:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191358] Review Request: python-mechanize - Stateful programmatic web browsing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605142108.k4EL8RRp005161@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-mechanize - Stateful programmatic web browsing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191358 lmacken at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From lmacken at redhat.com 2006-05-14 17:08 EST ------- Imported, FC-{4,5} CVS branches requested, devel branch tagged and build requested. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 14 21:16:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 May 2006 17:16:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191305] Review Request: crossfire-client-images - Images for the crossfire client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605142116.k4ELGb9x006411@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: crossfire-client-images - Images for the crossfire client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191305 ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2006-05-14 17:16 EST ------- I am unable to find the Source URL for this package which is hindering the formal review. Please explain where to find the sources for this. $ wget http://dl.sourceforge.net/crossfire/crossfire-client-images-1.9.0.tar.gz --14:22:33-- http://dl.sourceforge.net/crossfire/crossfire-client-images-1.9.0.tar.gz => `crossfire-client-images-1.9.0.tar.gz' Resolving localhost... 127.0.0.1 Connecting to localhost|127.0.0.1|:3128... connected. Proxy request sent, awaiting response... 404 Not Found 14:22:34 ERROR 404: Not Found. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 14 21:20:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 May 2006 17:20:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189891] Review Request: liblo - Open Sound Control library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605142120.k4ELKmMw007072@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: liblo - Open Sound Control library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189891 green at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From green at redhat.com 2006-05-14 17:20 EST ------- Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 15 01:17:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 May 2006 21:17:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191671] New: Review Request: serpentine Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191671 Summary: Review Request: serpentine Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: foolish at guezz.net QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://folk.ntnu.no/sindrb/packages/serpentine.spec SRPM URL: http://folk.ntnu.no/sindrb/packages/serpentine-0.6.4-1.src.rpm Description: Serpentine is an application for writing CD-Audio discs. It aims for simplicity, usability and compatibility -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 15 03:14:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 May 2006 23:14:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189656] Review Request: lilypond - A typesetting system for music notation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605150314.k4F3EJBB003416@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lilypond - A typesetting system for music notation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189656 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-05-14 23:14 EST ------- I'm afraid it still segfaults at the same place on FC5. (I think guile is broken in development, which keeps the build from making past it %configure there.) Initializing FontConfig... Rebuilding FontConfig cache /builddir/.rh-fontconfig/.fonts.cache-2. this may take a while... adding font directory: /builddir/build/BUILD/lilypond-2.8.2/out/share/lilypond/current/fonts/otf/ adding font directory: /builddir/build/BUILD/lilypond-2.8.2/out/share/lilypond/current/fonts/type1/Building font database. /bin/sh: line 1: 11282 Segmentation fault /builddir/build/BUILD/lilypond-2.8.2/lily/out/lilypond --verbose /builddir/build/BUILD/lilypond-2.8.2/ly/generate-documentation -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 15 03:45:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 May 2006 23:45:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191452] Review Request: orpie - scientific calculator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605150345.k4F3jGML009445@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: orpie - scientific calculator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191452 ------- Additional Comments From lists at forevermore.net 2006-05-14 23:44 EST ------- Spec updated.. new srpm at: http://forevermore.net/files/packages/orpie/orpie-1.4.3-3.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 15 04:38:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 00:38:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 185799] Review Request: nessus-plugins-GPL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605150438.k4F4cZf7019321@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nessus-plugins-GPL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=185799 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|fedora-extras- |fedora-package- |list at redhat.com |review at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2006-05-15 00:38 EST ------- Debian bug seems to make the most sense of this mess. http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=291658 You may want to ask the packager which are GPL. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 15 04:39:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 00:39:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 185799] Review Request: nessus-plugins-GPL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605150439.k4F4dgjw019597@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nessus-plugins-GPL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=185799 jpmahowald at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |182235 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 15 04:39:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 00:39:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 182941] Review Request: nessus-core Network vulnerability scanner In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605150439.k4F4drvr019639@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nessus-core Network vulnerability scanner https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=182941 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|fedora-extras- |fedora-package- |list at redhat.com |review at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 15 05:12:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 01:12:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189197] Review Request: gtk2hs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605150512.k4F5CSLI025575@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtk2hs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189197 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2006-05-15 01:12 EST ------- (I opened bug 191676 related to the mozilla-version packaging.) Thanks for the review and improving the packaging this much. :) I imported into cvs and built gtk2hs-0.9.10-1.fc6. Requested FC-4 and FC-5 branches, and added to owners. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 15 06:09:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 02:09:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191682] New: add/remove software failed to open. Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191682 Summary: add/remove software failed to open. Product: Fedora Core Version: fc5 Platform: i386 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: notting at redhat.com ReportedBy: mbarr at hotkey.net.au QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Description of problem: In Fedora Core 5 I ran add/remove software which chugged away for a while and then came up with an error message saying I should attach this file to a bug report. The name of the window is package manager but I can't find that component listed above. Installed Fedora Core 5 yesterday as a web server with a few extra components thrown in. Hope this helps ------- Additional Comments From mbarr at hotkey.net.au 2006-05-15 02:09 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=129039) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=129039&action=view) update Bug file -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 15 06:48:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 02:48:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191350] Review Request: perl-Spreadsheet-ParseExcel In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605150648.k4F6mEWr013737@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Spreadsheet-ParseExcel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191350 ------- Additional Comments From mpeters at mac.com 2006-05-15 02:48 EST ------- New spec file and src.rpm: http://mpeters.us/fc_extras/perl-Spreadsheet-ParseExcel-0.2603-1.src.rpm http://mpeters.us/fc_extras/perl-Spreadsheet-ParseExcel.spec Ready for review. I went ahead and made the package arch dependent so that it can install and own the map file. The japanese support that the map file provides will not work until bug #191387 is resolved, but when bug #191387 is resolved it should *just work* (famous last words ...) NOTES - The package is arch dependent solely because of the map file. This causes a completely empty and useless debuginfo package. So I set a macro in the spec file to not build the debuginfo package. The license is issue is resolved (GPL or perl). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 15 07:21:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 03:21:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191594] Review Request: gtkglextmm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605150721.k4F7L1Zf020518@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtkglextmm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191594 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2006-05-15 03:20 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > Alright, I reuploaded a new version of the spec. Please increment the release-tag. I am going to continue the review once you do. > > * The spec explicitly > > Requires: gtkglext > > Requires: gtkmm24 > > > This shouldn't be necessary. > > Ok, I removed them. But for my personal education, could you explain me why ? The main package is a pure run-time library package. Rpms of applications using these libraries will automatically be added dependencies on these shared libraries and their dependencies, when *building* rpms of these applications. (i.e. these Requires are necessary in *-devel rpms, but not in runtime rpms). > is the first rpm spec I write, I only have a previous experience with gentoo > ebuilds ... Is it because rpm added automatically a dependency on the > *librairies* in the gtkglext package by checking undefined symbols ? Almost. Rpm adds dependencies on the libraries (It adds "Requires: libfoo.so.1"), not on the package ("Requires: foo"). Depsolvers/Installers such as yum/apt etc. will translate "Requires: libfoo.so.1" into packages. > > * Please explain /usr/lib/gtkglextmm-1.2/proc/m4/* > > I don't know what these files are (Look like some m4 macros to help converting > > some types), how they are supposed to be used and why they need to be shipped. > > > AFAIS, they don't they seem to be used by anything in gtkglextmm. > > Well, I use this library as an app developper, I am heavily using GtkGLExt with C++ and have never found gtkmm/gtkglextmm to be attractive ;) > and I don't need these files > either. However, directly from the README file in the source package in tools/m4 : .. > So I guess some people have a use for it ... Hmm, seems like an historic artefact (== upstream bug) or a packaging bug in FE gtkmm to me. AFAICT, older versions of gtkmm seem to have shipped scripts using the macros, newer versions don't seem to do so. Anyway, this is not a blocker for this review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 15 09:33:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 05:33:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188180] Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605150933.k4F9XJlu020071@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188180 ------- Additional Comments From laurent.rineau__fc_extra at normalesup.org 2006-05-15 05:33 EST ------- (In reply to comment #37) > %changelog > * Sat May 13 2006 Rex Dieter 4.1.2-11 [...] > - pkgconfig files: hardlinks -> relative symlinks, strip -L%{_libdir}/mysql > and -L%%{_builddir}/qt-x11-opensource-src-%%version/lib Actually, I do not really understand why you trip -L%{_libdir}/mysql from pkgconfig file. It might be a FE rule that I am not aware. (In reply to comment #48) > %changelog > * Sat May 14 2006 Rex Dieter 4.1.2-14 [...] - docs: don't mark examples as %doc ** rpmlint has new warnings after this change: W: qt4-docs devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/qt4/examples/tools/plugandpaint/plugindialog.h for every header in -examples/. Furthermore, the package guidelines states that a file marked as %doc should not be required by the package: "If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present." (Maybe future versions of rpm will allow to uninstall %doc files, and %lang files.) However, %{qtdir}/bin/qtdemo (in qt4-devel) depends on the headers and sources in %{qtdir}/examples and %{qtdir}/demo. IMHO nothing should be %doc in the -docs subpackage (as in tetex-doc in fc). %{qtdir}/bin/qtdemo should go in qt4-docs, I think. ** Subpackage -docs should be named -doc The packaging guidelines and the review guidelines do not agree on the name of documentation subpackage. "Tom?'spot'?Callaway"? has admitted on the FE list that it was a typo in the review guidelines: a documentation subpackage should be named -doc. ** There are dandling symlinks in %{_bindir}. It seems that there are some binaries in the bin/ subdirectory of Qt build tree that are not installed. And qt3to4 got the suffix. Proposed patch: @@ -250,10 +250,10 @@ # Make symlinks in %%_bindir mkdir -p %{buildroot}%{_bindir} -pushd bin +pushd %{buildroot}%{qtdir}/bin for i in *; do SUFFIX=4 - [ "$1" == "qt3to4" ] && SUFFIX="" + [ "$i" == "qt3to4" ] && SUFFIX="" ln -s ../%{_lib}/%{qt_dirname}/bin/$i %{buildroot}%{_bindir}/${i}${SUFFIX} done popd -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 15 10:09:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 06:09:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191218] Review Request: PyScript - Postscript graphics with Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605151009.k4FA9mYi027293@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PyScript - Postscript graphics with Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191218 ------- Additional Comments From paultcochrane at gmail.com 2006-05-15 06:09 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > A couple of things: > 1) %prep section: > make it: > %setup -q Done. Spec file is a lot cleaner now. > 2) I read http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Python , you should do that > too. I hinted to replace paths with libdir but in this page you can read about > %{python_sitelib}, use this instead. Done. > 3) use wildcards in the %files section, instead of listing all files seperatly > (see the url in 2 for an example) Done as much as possible. There are some files in the lib/ directory of the PyScript source tree that we don't yet want distributed so I've kept these files specified explicitly. > 4) python setup.py install --prefix=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT/usr still has /usr hardcoded Fixed. Thank you again for your time! I have updated the SRPM and SPEC files, they are at: Spec URL: http://dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/pyscript/pyscript.spec SRPM URL: http://dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/pyscript/pyscript-0.6-3.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 15 10:45:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 06:45:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191239] Review Request: qjackctl - Qt based JACK control application In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605151045.k4FAjcS4003752@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qjackctl - Qt based JACK control application https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191239 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-05-15 06:45 EST ------- (In reply to comment #6) > I agree and that's why I use, when possible, built-in macros. > > [I thought it was policy.] It's not policy, unless the packaging guidelines have changed since I last read them. > My take on this: if the results of running a build script depend on overriding a > basic core unix command by the script builder then I'd label that a bug in the > build script. While your example for rm sounds reasonable, it is not in the > context of executing a build script which, I think, cannot/should not be > interactive. Using the macro would actually expose (IMHO) a bug. I'm sure other > more applicable examples could be put forward, of course... I don't understand what you're getting at here. The example I gave was that someone rebuilding a package had a local "rm" script, earlier in their PATH than /bin/rm, that prompted for confirmation. If this person rebuilt a package that used plain "rm", the build would become "interactive" (which is bad), but if they rebuilt a package that used "%{__rm}" instead, the build would be non-interactive as it's supposed to be (since %{__rm} would expand to /bin/rm and hence their local rm script wouldn't be used). Using the macro is hence an advantage. (In reply to comment #7) > My preference is to only use macros if there's a solid gain to be had. As in, > its something that's expected to change (versions) or it handles something ugly > for you (%configure). I don't see any real gain in using macros such as > %{_make}. I think reproducability of builds is a solid gain. > And most of all, the spec templates do not use these macros, which > implies to me they should not be used. Or perhaps the templates should be updated? > It would be nice to have an explicit policy up on the wiki for this, even if > that policy is "Use whatever, just be consistent", much like the %{buildroot} vs > $RPM_BUILD_ROOT policy. +1 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 15 10:52:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 06:52:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191549] Review Request: hping3 - TCP/IP stack auditing and much more In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605151052.k4FAqJ4d005080@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hping3 - TCP/IP stack auditing and much more https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191549 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-05-15 06:52 EST ------- As this package has: Obsoletes: hping2 it should also have: Provides: hping2 so as not to break dependencies for any package that requires hping2. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 15 10:55:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 06:55:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 179040] Review Request: socat In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605151055.k4FAthhU005872@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: socat https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=179040 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-05-15 06:55 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=129046) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=129046&action=view) FC5 mock build log for socat-1.4.3.1-1.src.rpm (In reply to comment #12) > Can someone give me a complete log of the build failure mentioned in #4. As I > said, on my X86_64 FC4, it just builds. FC5 mock build log attached. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 15 11:00:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 07:00:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190243] Review Request: scim-bridge (gtkimm module in C) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605151100.k4FB0aNn006962@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scim-bridge (gtkimm module in C) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190243 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2006-05-15 07:00 EST ------- [hmm thought I already posted this here:] http://people.redhat.com/petersen/extras/scim-bridge-0.1.7-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 15 11:02:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 07:02:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188359] Review Request: bugzilla - bug tracking tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605151102.k4FB238V007230@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bugzilla - bug tracking tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188359 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-05-15 07:01 EST ------- (In reply to comment #13) > Bugzilla's contrib stuff depends on being where it is, for the most part. > > The first time you run ./checksetup.pl it creates a various .htaccess files that > prevents access to files that people shouldn't be accessing. If you want, you > can be clever and generate these files in advance and then include it as a patch > with the distro. They don't have anything actually dynamic in them, I think. > (And actually, that makes me wonder why we don't just have them in CVS.) Would it not be possible to create a /etc/httpd/conf.d/bugzilla.conf with the appropriae permissions instead of having a bunch of .htaccess files (which are slower at runtime and rpmlint will whinge about them)? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 15 11:06:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 07:06:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188445] Review Request: bootconf In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605151106.k4FB6kV5008198@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bootconf https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188445 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-05-15 07:06 EST ------- (In reply to comment #6) > grubby isn't in base, or Extras. Actually it is; it's bundled with mkinitrd. The kernel post-install scripts use it (see /sbin/new-kernel-pkg). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 15 11:49:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 07:49:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191218] Review Request: PyScript - Postscript graphics with Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605151149.k4FBnFwh017133@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PyScript - Postscript graphics with Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191218 ------- Additional Comments From tjikkun at xs4all.nl 2006-05-15 07:48 EST ------- Hi, this package seems ok to me now, except for 2 small things: - requires doesn't have to have python, that will be taken care of automatically - changelog entries should be in the format: * Wed May 14 2003 Joe Packager - 0:1.0-0.fdr.2 you are missing the version in the end. Other then that you now have to wait* until some sponsor reviews this package. *) If you just wait, chances of getting sponsored aren't that high, so try to review some other packages, or submit some more yourself. (In short, show that you are worthy of sponsorship, like i am trying to do myself) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 15 12:05:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 08:05:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190664] Review Request: keyutils - Kernel key management userspace utilities In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605151205.k4FC58wd020098@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: keyutils - Kernel key management userspace utilities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190664 ------- Additional Comments From dhowells at redhat.com 2006-05-15 08:04 EST ------- As stated in comment #7, I've disabled the building of the static library for the moment (I can always bring it back later if it becomes necessary), and I've removed the release number from the library name. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 15 12:14:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 08:14:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188180] Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605151214.k4FCEmP2021712@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188180 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-05-15 08:14 EST ------- Re: comment #56 > I do not really understand why you trip -L%{_libdir}/mysql > from pkgconfig file Because it's not (really) needed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 15 12:23:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 08:23:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188180] Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605151223.k4FCN4Pk023254@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188180 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-05-15 08:22 EST ------- Re: -doc subpkg naming Yeah -doc is the way to go. We're starting to find quite a few interesting interdependancies between -devel and -doc. qtdemo was one (it depended on the demos/examples from -doc, so I was moving it to -doc), then I found assistant (in -devel) tries to auto-load qt documentation on startup (and fails, obviously, if -doc/-docs isn't installed). I'm beginning to doubt the wisdom of even doing a -doc subpkg... who knows how many more interdendancies may exist. At the moment, I'm leaning toward dropping the notion of a -doc subpkg, and move it all (back) to -devel (mostly for sake of simplicity). Comments/opinions? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 15 12:24:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 08:24:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191218] Review Request: PyScript - Postscript graphics with Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605151224.k4FCOQm0023603@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PyScript - Postscript graphics with Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191218 ------- Additional Comments From paultcochrane at gmail.com 2006-05-15 08:24 EST ------- (In reply to comment #7) > - requires doesn't have to have python, that will be taken care of automatically Removed. > - changelog entries should be in the format: > * Wed May 14 2003 Joe Packager - 0:1.0-0.fdr.2 > you are missing the version in the end. Got the version number working such that rpmlint is now happy. Many thanks for your help, it is greatly appreciated. :-) As per usual, the updated files are at: Spec URL: http://dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/pyscript/pyscript.spec SRPM URL: http://dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/pyscript/pyscript-0.6-4.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 15 13:14:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 09:14:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189690] Review Request: swh-plugins In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605151314.k4FDExtv002273@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: swh-plugins https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189690 ------- Additional Comments From bugs.michael at gmx.net 2006-05-15 09:14 EST ------- Something ought to be done about %{_datadir}/ladspa/rdf/* however, since currently, the directories are orphaned. Depending on administrator's umask, they can be created with insufficient file access permissions. The directories don't belong in the ladspa package and not in to liblrdf either. So it would be fine if every ladspa plugin package owned them. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 15 13:57:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 09:57:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188180] Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605151357.k4FDv8KH013890@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188180 ------- Additional Comments From laurent.rineau__fc_extra at normalesup.org 2006-05-15 09:57 EST ------- Actually, libQtAssistant.a search assistant in the path. The following patch is required: --- qt-x11-opensource-src-4.1.2/tools/assistant/lib/qassistantclient.cpp~ 2006-03-20 14:04:38.000000000 +0100 +++ qt-x11-opensource-src-4.1.2/tools/assistant/lib/qassistantclient.cpp 2006-05-15 15:42:07.000000000 +0200 @@ -170,7 +170,7 @@ else { QFileInfo fi( path ); if ( fi.isDir() ) - assistantCommand = path + "/assistant"; + assistantCommand = path + "/assistant4"; else assistantCommand = path; } One problem: assistant should perhaps go to qt4 (not -devel), or a -assistant sub package (I would prefere the latter), because of libQtAssistant. As regard the -L%{_libdir}/mysql, sorry for that: I had not noticed that -lmysql was not in that .pc file. As regards the necessity to have a -doc subpackage, du(1) shows: $ du -s /usr/lib64/qt4/{examples,demos,lib,plugins,include,doc}/. | sort -n 2636 /usr/lib64/qt4/plugins/. 4392 /usr/lib64/qt4/demos/. 13596 /usr/lib64/qt4/examples/. 13828 /usr/lib64/qt4/lib/. 15892 /usr/lib64/qt4/include/. 61756 /usr/lib64/qt4/doc/. It seems mandatory. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 15 14:04:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 10:04:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188180] Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605151404.k4FE4Eic016223@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188180 ------- Additional Comments From laurent.rineau__fc_extra at normalesup.org 2006-05-15 10:04 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=129058) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=129058&action=view) Patch for qt4-4.1.2-14.spec Before your comment #57, I was compiling and testing a home-made qt-4.1.2-15. here is the patch I used. It does solve the assistant problem. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 15 14:28:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 10:28:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188180] Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605151428.k4FESWW1022081@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188180 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-05-15 10:28 EST ------- Re: comment #59 Can you explain your rationale for the patch and why assistant should be in qt4 and not qt4-devel? What about my comment #58 about assistant giving errors if -doc is not installed? I'm against an -assistant subpkg, I don't see any need/value in that. I think I'm just going to roll 4.1.2-16 with -doc bits mashed back into -devel to avoid all these messy interdependancies for now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 15 14:33:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 10:33:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191523] Review Request: perl-XML-Stream In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605151433.k4FEXPu9023633@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-XML-Stream https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191523 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-05-15 10:33 EST ------- Updated: Spec URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-XML-Stream.spec SRPM URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-XML-Stream-1.22-2.fc5.src.rpm Additionally, with respect to licensing, the author indicates that perl (GPL & Artistic) is the correct license: Date: Sun, 14 May 2006 16:52:31 -0500 From: Ryan Eatmon To: Chris Weyl Subject: Re: Net::XMPP license question Yep. Chris Weyl wrote: > Hey Ryan-- > > Quick question. I'm in the middle of packaging up Net::XMPP (and for > that matter, XML::Stream and Net::Jabber) for fedora extras, and it > was pointed out to me that while Net/XMPP.pm states "COPYRIGHT: This > module is free software, you can redistribute it and/or modify it > under the same terms as Perl itself", the actual archive includes a > LICENSE.LGPL. > > Are all three of these modules under "the same terms as Perl itself"? > > Thanks:) > -Chris -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 15 14:37:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 10:37:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191540] Review Request: perl-Net-XMPP In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605151437.k4FEbO17024796@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-XMPP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191540 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-05-15 10:37 EST ------- Updated: Spec URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-Net-XMPP.spec SRPM URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-Net-XMPP-1.0-2.fc5.src.rpm Additionally, with respect to licensing, the author indicates that perl (GPL & Artistic) is the correct license: Date: Sun, 14 May 2006 16:52:31 -0500 From: Ryan Eatmon To: Chris Weyl Subject: Re: Net::XMPP license question Yep. Chris Weyl wrote: > Hey Ryan-- > > Quick question. I'm in the middle of packaging up Net::XMPP (and for > that matter, XML::Stream and Net::Jabber) for fedora extras, and it > was pointed out to me that while Net/XMPP.pm states "COPYRIGHT: This > module is free software, you can redistribute it and/or modify it > under the same terms as Perl itself", the actual archive includes a > LICENSE.LGPL. > > Are all three of these modules under "the same terms as Perl itself"? > > Thanks:) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 15 14:42:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 10:42:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191545] Review Request: perl-Net-Jabber In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605151442.k4FEg1de026411@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-Jabber https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191545 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-05-15 10:41 EST ------- Updated: Spec URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-Net-Jabber.spec SRPM URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-Net-Jabber-2.0-2.fc5.src.rpm Additionally, with respect to licensing, the author indicates that perl (GPL & Artistic) is the correct license: Date: Sun, 14 May 2006 16:52:31 -0500 From: Ryan Eatmon To: Chris Weyl Subject: Re: Net::XMPP license question Yep. Chris Weyl wrote: > Hey Ryan-- > > Quick question. I'm in the middle of packaging up Net::XMPP (and for > that matter, XML::Stream and Net::Jabber) for fedora extras, and it > was pointed out to me that while Net/XMPP.pm states "COPYRIGHT: This > module is free software, you can redistribute it and/or modify it > under the same terms as Perl itself", the actual archive includes a > LICENSE.LGPL. > > Are all three of these modules under "the same terms as Perl itself"? > > Thanks:) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 15 14:51:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 10:51:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191523] Review Request: perl-XML-Stream In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605151451.k4FEpO3n028990@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-XML-Stream https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191523 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-05-15 10:51 EST ------- Did the author have anything at all to say about the large copyright blocks on the code itself? The fact that this conflicts both the copyright statements in the documentation and seemingly the author's intent is disturbing. It might even make the software non-distributable. I really think the author needs to release an update where everything agrees, or explicitly gives you permision to patch out the conflicting license statements and delete COPYING.LGPL. Sorry. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 15 14:57:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 10:57:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191619] Review Request: perl-CSS-Tiny - Read/Write .css files with as little code as possible In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605151457.k4FEvBj3030633@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-CSS-Tiny - Read/Write .css files with as little code as possible https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191619 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |tibbs at math.uh.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 15 15:00:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 11:00:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191523] Review Request: perl-XML-Stream In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605151500.k4FF0NRk031449@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-XML-Stream https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191523 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-05-15 11:00 EST ------- Author emailed, asking for permission to patch out and remove LGPL and statemente. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 15 15:15:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 11:15:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188180] Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605151515.k4FFFCHb003202@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188180 ------- Additional Comments From laurent.rineau__fc_extra at normalesup.org 2006-05-15 11:14 EST ------- libQtAssistant.a is a library that includes only one class, named QtAssistantClient. Its purpose is to permit to launch the Qt Assistant, with special communication features between the application and the Assistant. However, the implementation of it QtAssistantClient searches assistant in the $PATH, and not in the Qt directory. An application compiled with libQtAssistant will launch "assistant" from the path. I do not know if there already exist some third-party application compiled with libQtAssistant. qtdemo uses it. On my system, there are two problems: -?if qt4-devel is not installed, the Qt4 assistant is not installed, -?my $PATH does not contain /usr/lib64/qt4/bin, and the Qt3 assistant is launched instead of the Qt4 one. And it fails to display the documentation (not in the adequate format). The libQtAssistant should search for "assistant4", which is in %{_bindir}/. That's why IMHO, if the qt4 package ships libQtAssistant.a, the assistant tool should be move from qt4-devel to qt4 itself, or to a special small package qt4-assistant (like qt4-config), as its normal use requires qt4-doc. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 15 15:22:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 11:22:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191619] Review Request: perl-CSS-Tiny - Read/Write .css files with as little code as possible In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605151522.k4FFMbbC005421@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-CSS-Tiny - Read/Write .css files with as little code as possible https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191619 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-05-15 11:22 EST ------- Everything looks good; the only thing I question is the reason for including test.css as %doc. It seems a bit pointless to me, but I guess it doesn't hurt anything. Review: * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. License text is included in the package. * source files match upstream: 66fac70597a4e6628f1875037d1d2a94 CSS-Tiny-1.11.tar.gz 66fac70597a4e6628f1875037d1d2a94 CSS-Tiny-1.11.tar.gz-srpm * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane. * no shared libraries are present. * package is not relocatable. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * %clean is present. * %check is present and all tests pass: All tests successful. Files=4, Tests=47, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.14 cusr + 0.06 csys = 0.20 CPU) * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no libtool .la droppings. * not a GUI app. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 15 15:23:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 11:23:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188180] Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605151523.k4FFNQLu005660@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188180 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-05-15 11:23 EST ------- Thanks for the explanation. With that in mind, -doc still makes sense, and we can add -assistant to -doc, with Provides: qt4-assistant, avoiding making -assistant Requires: -doc, and change -doc's deps from Requires: qt4-devel to Requires: qt4 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 15 15:32:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 11:32:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191743] New: Review Request: sysprof - a sampling CPU profiler Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191743 Summary: Review Request: sysprof - a sampling CPU profiler Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: giallu at gmail.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://giallu.interfree.it/fedora/sysprof.spec SRPM URL: http://giallu.interfree.it/fedora/sysprof-1.0.2-1.src.rpm Description: Sysprof is a sampling CPU profiler for Linux that uses a kernel module to profile the entire system, not just a single application. Sysprof handles shared libraries and applications do not need to be recompiled. In fact they don't even have to be restarted. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 15 15:37:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 11:37:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191745] New: Review Request: sysprof-kmod - kernel module for the sysprof profiler Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191745 Summary: Review Request: sysprof-kmod - kernel module for the sysprof profiler Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: giallu at gmail.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://giallu.interfree.it/fedora/sysprof-kmod.spec SRPM URL: http://giallu.interfree.it/fedora/sysprof-kmod-1.0.2-1.2.6.16_1.2111_FC5.src.rpm Description: This is the kernel module needed for sysprof operations -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 15 15:38:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 11:38:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188180] Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605151538.k4FFcGU5010352@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188180 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-05-15 11:38 EST ------- Re: comment #59 patch That looks wrong to me, should it be this instead: --- qassistantclient.cpp.assistant4 2006-03-20 07:04:38.000000000 -0600 +++ qassistantclient.cpp 2006-05-15 10:41:41.000000000 -0500 @@ -166,7 +166,7 @@ : QObject( parent ), host ( "localhost" ) { if ( path.isEmpty() ) - assistantCommand = "assistant"; + assistantCommand = "assistant4"; else { QFileInfo fi( path ); if ( fi.isDir() ) Since it uses the system path (only) if the provided path is empty. If path "isDir" one would hope that an app author would be wise enough to provide %qtdir/bin and not %bindir. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 15 15:39:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 11:39:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191743] Review Request: sysprof - a sampling CPU profiler In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605151539.k4FFdASG010614@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sysprof - a sampling CPU profiler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191743 giallu at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |191745 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 15 15:39:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 11:39:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191745] Review Request: sysprof-kmod - kernel module for the sysprof profiler In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605151539.k4FFdM03010703@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sysprof-kmod - kernel module for the sysprof profiler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191745 giallu at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |191743 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 15 15:40:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 11:40:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189009] Review Request: bzrtools - A collection of utilities and plugins for Bazaar-NG In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605151540.k4FFeat4011123@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bzrtools - A collection of utilities and plugins for Bazaar-NG https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189009 ------- Additional Comments From shahms at shahms.com 2006-05-15 11:40 EST ------- Fixed, new files at: http://shahms.mesd.k12.or.us/packages/bzrtools.spec http://shahms.mesd.k12.or.us/packages/bzrtools-0.8.1-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 15 15:47:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 11:47:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188180] Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605151547.k4FFl9R0013204@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188180 ------- Additional Comments From laurent.rineau__fc_extra at normalesup.org 2006-05-15 11:46 EST ------- Maybe the package qt4 should ship a file %doc?README.fedora to explain were are things, in the qt4-* packages. :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 15 15:49:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 11:49:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191620] Review Request: perl-PPI-HTML - Generate syntax-hightlighted HTML for Perl using PPI In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605151549.k4FFnqZu013935@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-PPI-HTML - Generate syntax-hightlighted HTML for Perl using PPI https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191620 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |tibbs at math.uh.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 15 15:50:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 11:50:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188180] Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605151550.k4FFoSvM014155@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188180 ------- Additional Comments From laurent.rineau__fc_extra at normalesup.org 2006-05-15 11:50 EST ------- (In reply to comment #64) > Re: comment #59 patch > That looks wrong to me, should it be this instead: > if ( path.isEmpty() ) > - assistantCommand = "assistant"; > + assistantCommand = "assistant4"; > else { Yes, of course. I understood the code like you, but I made a stupid mistake. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 15 16:28:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 12:28:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191620] Review Request: perl-PPI-HTML - Generate syntax-hightlighted HTML for Perl using PPI In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605151628.k4FGSsK8023750@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-PPI-HTML - Generate syntax-hightlighted HTML for Perl using PPI https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191620 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-05-15 12:28 EST ------- Not much to say: * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible; license text is included in the package. * source files match upstream: c2858d87c0e12ab87845606957bcd122 PPI-HTML-1.07.tar.gz c2858d87c0e12ab87845606957bcd122 PPI-HTML-1.07.tar.gz-srpm * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane. * no shared libraries are present. * package is not relocatable. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * %clean is present. * %check is present and all tests pass: All tests successful. Files=3, Tests=19, 1 wallclock secs ( 0.22 cusr + 0.08 csys = 0.30 CPU) * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no libtool .la droppings. * not a GUI app. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 15 16:35:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 12:35:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189009] Review Request: bzrtools - A collection of utilities and plugins for Bazaar-NG In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605151635.k4FGZr5l027084@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bzrtools - A collection of utilities and plugins for Bazaar-NG https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189009 orion at cora.nwra.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From orion at cora.nwra.com 2006-05-15 12:35 EST ------- - Package builds in mock - rpmlint clean now Fix: - BR should be python, not python-devel. With that fix, this is approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 15 16:54:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 12:54:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191239] Review Request: qjackctl - Qt based JACK control application In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605151654.k4FGsolf032328@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qjackctl - Qt based JACK control application https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191239 ------- Additional Comments From nando at ccrma.stanford.edu 2006-05-15 12:54 EST ------- (In reply to comment #8) > (In reply to comment #6) > > I agree and that's why I use, when possible, built-in macros. > > > > [I thought it was policy.] > > It's not policy, unless the packaging guidelines have changed since I last read > them. > > > My take on this: if the results of running a build script depend on overriding a > > basic core unix command by the script builder then I'd label that a bug in the > > build script. While your example for rm sounds reasonable, it is not in the > > context of executing a build script which, I think, cannot/should not be > > interactive. Using the macro would actually expose (IMHO) a bug. I'm sure other > > more applicable examples could be put forward, of course... > > I don't understand what you're getting at here. The example I gave was that > someone rebuilding a package had a local "rm" script, earlier in their PATH than > /bin/rm, that prompted for confirmation. If this person rebuilt a package that > used plain "rm", the build would become "interactive" (which is bad), but if > they rebuilt a package that used "%{__rm}" instead, the build would be > non-interactive as it's supposed to be (since %{__rm} would expand to /bin/rm > and hence their local rm script wouldn't be used). Using the macro is hence an > advantage. Arghhh, sorry, just a misunderstanding on my part. For some reason I though that the "regression" you were mentioning was to use %{__rm}, not to take it out. Sorry. We are in agreement about the macros. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 15 17:03:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 13:03:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189656] Review Request: lilypond - A typesetting system for music notation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605151703.k4FH3Csu001945@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lilypond - A typesetting system for music notation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189656 ------- Additional Comments From qspencer at ieee.org 2006-05-15 13:02 EST ------- You're right, it wasn't fixed. I thought I had duplicated the conditions to make the build fail, but I guess I hadn't. Anyway, the upstream author responded to my bug report with what turned out to be a fairly trivial patch, and this time I think it's actually fixed. Updated files: http://webpages.charter.net/qspencer/rpm/lilypond-2.8.2-2.src.rpm http://webpages.charter.net/qspencer/rpm/lilypond.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 15 17:15:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 13:15:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189010] Review Request: pybaz - Python library bindings for the GNU Arch/Bazaar RCS In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605151715.k4FHFeNh004898@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pybaz - Python library bindings for the GNU Arch/Bazaar RCS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189010 orion at cora.nwra.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |orion at cora.nwra.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From orion at cora.nwra.com 2006-05-15 13:15 EST ------- Good - - package name matches guidelines - spec is clean/legible - License is good, matches source. - owns dirs. - builds in mock on devel. Must fix: - Add COPYING to %doc - Drop unneeded python-devel BR. Trouble: - My mock for FC5 is pulling in epydoc-2.1-2.i386 rather than epydoc-2.1-4.noarch, and make doc fails with the former but works with the latter. I think we'll need to get the repo fixed before a fc5 build works. I'll post a message to the FE list about it. Question: - Get the following output during make doc devel. Not sure if it causes any problems though: make doc rm -rf html mkdir ,,make-doc || exit 1 cp -al pybaz ,,make-doc rm -rf ,,make-doc/pybaz/tests cd ,,make-doc ; ../mypydoc --docformat "restructuredtext en" --no-private pybaz Importing 15 modules. [......... Error importing 'pybaz.backends.knotted': No module named twisted.internet ......] Building API documentation for 14 modules. [./usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/epydoc/markup/restructuredtext.py:174: DeprecationWarning: docutils.utils.Reporter.set_conditions deprecated; set attributes via configuration settings or directly document.reporter.set_conditions('', 10000, 10000, None) =========================================================================== In pybaz.ArchSourceTree.iter_inventory docstring: --------------------------------------------------------------------------- - Warning: @keyword used for explitict parameter source - Warning: @keyword used for explitict parameter precious - Warning: @keyword used for explitict parameter backups - Warning: @keyword used for explitict parameter junk - Warning: @keyword used for explitict parameter unrecognized - Warning: @keyword used for explitict parameter trees - Warning: @keyword used for explitict parameter directories - Warning: @keyword used for explitict parameter files - Warning: @keyword used for explitict parameter both - Warning: @keyword used for explitict parameter limit =========================================================================== In pybaz.WorkingTree.commit docstring: --------------------------------------------------------------------------- - Warning: @keyword used for explitict parameter version - Warning: @keyword used for explitict parameter log - Warning: @keyword used for explitict parameter strict - Warning: @keyword used for explitict parameter seal - Warning: @keyword used for explitict parameter fix - Warning: @keyword used for explitict parameter out_of_date_ok - Warning: @keyword used for explitict parameter file_list =========================================================================== In pybaz.WorkingTree.iter_commit docstring: --------------------------------------------------------------------------- - Warning: @keyword used for explitict parameter version - Warning: @keyword used for explitict parameter log - Warning: @keyword used for explitict parameter strict - Warning: @keyword used for explitict parameter seal - Warning: @keyword used for explitict parameter fix - Warning: @keyword used for explitict parameter out_of_date_ok - Warning: @keyword used for explitict parameter file_list =========================================================================== In pybaz.WorkingTree.undo docstring: --------------------------------------------------------------------------- - Warning: @keyword used for explitict parameter revision - Warning: @keyword used for explitict parameter output - Warning: @keyword used for explitict parameter quiet - Warning: @keyword used for explitict parameter throw_away .............] Writing HTML docs (100 files) to 'html'. [ 1%] ............................................................ [ 61%] ........................................ Warning: Failed identifier crossreference targets: - file.next (from pybaz.backends.forkexec.exec_safe_iter_stdout.next) - file.readline (from pybaz.backends.forkexec.exec_safe_iter_stdout.next) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 15 17:37:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 13:37:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 186892] Review Request: conntrack - Tool to manipulate netfilter connection tracking table In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605151737.k4FHbYEa011709@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: conntrack - Tool to manipulate netfilter connection tracking table https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=186892 ------- Additional Comments From i at stingr.net 2006-05-15 13:37 EST ------- http://stingr.net/l/fe/conntrack.spec http://stingr.net/l/fe/conntrack-1.0-0.1.beta1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 15 17:53:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 13:53:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191434] Review Request: xarchon - Arcade board game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605151753.k4FHrroH016782@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xarchon - Arcade board game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191434 wart at kobold.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2006-05-15 13:53 EST ------- All MUST and SHOULD items addressed. Runs without crashing (though I didn't test it extensively). APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 15 18:02:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 14:02:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190066] Review Request: php-pear-Mail In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605151802.k4FI2n8n019528@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Mail https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190066 ------- Additional Comments From Fedora at FamilleCollet.com 2006-05-15 14:02 EST ------- Spec URL: http://remi.collet.free.fr/rpms/extras/php-pear-Mail.spec SRPM URL: http://remi.collet.free.fr/rpms/extras/php-pear-Mail-1.1.10-4.fc5.src.rpm Mock root.log : http://remi.collet.free.fr/rpms/extras/php-pear-Mail-root.log Mock build.log : http://remi.collet.free.fr/rpms/extras/php-pear-Mail-build.log - Require php-pear(PEAR) >= 1.4.9 (no epoch on classname, only on package) - Requires(hint): php-pear(Net_SMTP) >= 1.1.0 (only comment actually) - bundle the v3.01 PHP LICENSE file (as php-pear package) - use --packagingroot (instead of -R, as it work with php-pear 1.4.9) - %check (move sanity check from %install to %check, as in php-pear) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 15 18:08:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 14:08:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189656] Review Request: lilypond - A typesetting system for music notation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605151808.k4FI8xSl021634@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lilypond - A typesetting system for music notation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189656 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |tibbs at math.uh.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 15 18:09:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 14:09:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191305] Review Request: crossfire-client-images - Images for the crossfire client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605151809.k4FI9HkT021720@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: crossfire-client-images - Images for the crossfire client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191305 ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2006-05-15 14:09 EST ------- I pulled this tarball from upstream's source rpm, and had naively assumed that it was on the download area as well. I've poked upstream to push this to their download directory, and in the meantime I'm looking for solutions to generating it myself during the build. This might require some changes to the crossfire base package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 15 18:11:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 14:11:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 179237] Review Request: swaks - A command-line SMTP transaction tester In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605151811.k4FIBOxS022387@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: swaks - A command-line SMTP transaction tester https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=179237 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-05-15 14:11 EST ------- I added the Authen::DigestMD5 dependency, imported, built and requested branches. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 15 18:14:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 14:14:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188176] Review Request: gauche-gtk - Gauche extension module to use GTK In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605151814.k4FIEnu4023808@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gauche-gtk - Gauche extension module to use GTK https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188176 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-05-15 14:14 EST ------- Were you going to check this in? I see no reason not to add a dependency on gauche-gl if it makes sense to do so. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 15 18:20:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 14:20:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188359] Review Request: bugzilla - bug tracking tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605151820.k4FIK6iQ025185@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bugzilla - bug tracking tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188359 ------- Additional Comments From mkanat at bugzilla.org 2006-05-15 14:19 EST ------- (In reply to comment #15) > Would it not be possible to create a /etc/httpd/conf.d/bugzilla.conf with the > appropriae permissions instead of having a bunch of .htaccess files (which are > slower at runtime and rpmlint will whinge about them)? No, because we need to be in control of them ourselves. That is, the .htaccess files are required for security on Bugzilla, so we can't leave it up to a directory that's out of our control. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 15 18:30:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 14:30:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190101] Review Request: php-pear-Log In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605151830.k4FIUw4a028445@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Log https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190101 ------- Additional Comments From Fedora at FamilleCollet.com 2006-05-15 14:30 EST ------- Spec URL: http://remi.collet.free.fr/rpms/extras/php-pear-Log.spec SRPM URL: http://remi.collet.free.fr/rpms/extras/php-pear-Log-1.9.4-3.fc5.src.rpm Mock build log : http://remi.collet.free.fr/rpms/extras/php-pear-Log-build.log - Require pear >= 1.4.9 - Requires(hint): (only comment actually) + description - bundle the v3.01 PHP LICENSE file (as in php-pear) - use --packagingroot (instead of -R) - check from install to check (as in php-pear) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 15 18:32:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 14:32:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190101] Review Request: php-pear-Log In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605151832.k4FIWjXb029119@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Log https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190101 ------- Additional Comments From Fedora at FamilleCollet.com 2006-05-15 14:32 EST ------- ooops. SRPM URL: http://remi.collet.free.fr/rpms/extras/php-pear-Log-1.9.5-3.fc5.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 15 19:03:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 15:03:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187913] Review Request: mysql-query-browser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605151903.k4FJ3LAt007612@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mysql-query-browser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187913 ------- Additional Comments From dennis at ausil.us 2006-05-15 15:03 EST ------- I can reproduce this connecting to a fc3 box running mysql-server-3.23.58-16.FC3.1 but I am unable to reproduce connecting to 4.1.x or 5.x servers. I am going to install 4.0.x on a test box and see what happens -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 15 19:12:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 15:12:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191782] New: Review Request: rafkill - Top-down shooter with powerups Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191782 Summary: Review Request: rafkill - Top-down shooter with powerups Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/rafkill.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/rafkill-1.2.1-1.src.rpm Description: Rafkill is a vertical scrolling shoot-em up game. You can collect powerups during gameplay and you can goto the store with your spaceship and buy powerups or even a complete new ship with the points you've earned sofar. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 15 19:14:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 15:14:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188176] Review Request: gauche-gtk - Gauche extension module to use GTK In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605151914.k4FJEeKv010915@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gauche-gtk - Gauche extension module to use GTK https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188176 ------- Additional Comments From gemi at bluewin.ch 2006-05-15 15:14 EST ------- Ok, I thought there would be an further comment about this issue. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 15 19:14:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 15:14:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191434] Review Request: xarchon - Arcade board game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605151914.k4FJEk3q010950@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xarchon - Arcade board game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191434 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-05-15 15:14 EST ------- Thanks! I would like todo something back but Chris has taken all your reviews sofar :) Imported and Build. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 15 19:17:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 15:17:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191434] Review Request: xarchon - Arcade board game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605151917.k4FJHlU6011858@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xarchon - Arcade board game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191434 ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2006-05-15 15:17 EST ------- #187392? :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 15 19:24:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 15:24:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190040] Review Request: hydrogen - Advanced drum machine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605151924.k4FJOI9e013410@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hydrogen - Advanced drum machine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190040 ------- Additional Comments From seg at haxxed.com 2006-05-15 15:24 EST ------- Yeah, portaudio is redundant, and OSS is deprecated. One thing I've noticed about hydrogen is it eats quite a bit of RAM, and then jack wants to lock it. If the memlock rlimit isn't set to around 128mb, it will crash when used with jack with mem locking enabled. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 15 19:28:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 15:28:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177827] Review Request: python-ctypes - Advanced Foreign Function Interface for Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605151928.k4FJS5JG014550@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-ctypes - Advanced Foreign Function Interface for Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177827 ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2006-05-15 15:27 EST ------- Please reassign this bug to the actual reviewer. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 15 19:47:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 15:47:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 183912] Review Request: jack-audio-connection-kit - The Jack Audio Connection Kit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605151947.k4FJlxZN020550@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jack-audio-connection-kit - The Jack Audio Connection Kit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183912 ------- Additional Comments From seg at haxxed.com 2006-05-15 15:47 EST ------- I've managed to run into the memlock rlimit. Hydrogen seems to eat quite a bit of RAM, and jack apparently isn't very selective about what pages it locks down. I initially had my memlock rlimit set at 32mb, and Hydrogen would just crash on startup, with an out of memory error. I upped it to 64mb, and it would crash upon trying to load a song. I upped it to 128mb and that seems to be enough so far. (384mb RAM on this system) Changing the README.Fedora to say setting the limit to 1/2-2/3 of your RAM size or more is probably the best idea for now. As I review and use more audio apps I will get a better idea of what the minimum setting should be. Finals are over! My goal for today is to finish this review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 15 19:56:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 15:56:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177827] Review Request: python-ctypes - Advanced Foreign Function Interface for Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605151956.k4FJuTWd022761@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-ctypes - Advanced Foreign Function Interface for Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177827 pnasrat at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|gdk at redhat.com |toshio at tiki-lounge.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 15 20:05:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 16:05:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 183912] Review Request: jack-audio-connection-kit - The Jack Audio Connection Kit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605152005.k4FK54uo025441@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jack-audio-connection-kit - The Jack Audio Connection Kit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183912 ------- Additional Comments From nando at ccrma.stanford.edu 2006-05-15 16:05 EST ------- (In reply to comment #35) > I've managed to run into the memlock rlimit. Hydrogen seems to eat quite a bit > of RAM, and jack apparently isn't very selective about what pages it locks down. > I initially had my memlock rlimit set at 32mb, and Hydrogen would just crash on > startup, with an out of memory error. I upped it to 64mb, and it would crash > upon trying to load a song. I upped it to 128mb and that seems to be enough so > far. (384mb RAM on this system) > > Changing the README.Fedora to say setting the limit to 1/2-2/3 of your RAM size > or more is probably the best idea for now. As I review and use more audio apps I > will get a better idea of what the minimum setting should be. > > Finals are over! My goal for today is to finish this review. You don't say how you are starting jackd, you may try also to use the -u option, that will try to not lock pages for some common libraries: -u, --unlock Unlock libraries GTK+, QT, FLTK, Wine. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 15 20:07:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 16:07:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190040] Review Request: hydrogen - Advanced drum machine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605152007.k4FK7eYw026220@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hydrogen - Advanced drum machine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190040 ------- Additional Comments From seg at haxxed.com 2006-05-15 16:07 EST ------- (noted in more detail on the jack review) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 15 20:09:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 16:09:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 178900] Review Request: monodoc In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605152009.k4FK9KmT026555@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: monodoc https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=178900 ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at ameritech.net 2006-05-15 16:09 EST ------- These items still need to be fixed. * Unnecessary scriptlet for shared libraries, which this package doesn't have. * Inconsistent use of ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT} & %{buildroot}. Also, the *.pc file must be placed in -devel subpackage. This was decided yesterday on the FE mailing list yesterday. Spot is revising the main package documentation and I've already modified the Mono packaging page to reflect this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 15 20:31:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 16:31:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 178900] Review Request: monodoc In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605152031.k4FKVtTv032755@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: monodoc https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=178900 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-05-15 16:31 EST ------- New specfile uploaded. I've not uploaded the .src.rpm yet as my connection is playing up from here. Fixed the points you've made. Spec Name or Url: http://www.smmp.salford.ac.uk/packages/monodoc.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 15 20:41:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 16:41:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189656] Review Request: lilypond - A typesetting system for music notation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605152041.k4FKf9eS004274@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lilypond - A typesetting system for music notation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189656 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-05-15 16:40 EST ------- You're right, that was a trivial patch; sorry I couldn't have been more help in debugging it. In any case, guile in development is still busted, but a mock build on FC5 x86_64 ran through to completion. (!) Now, down to the review. Issues: Please consider removing BuildRequires: gcc-c++. This is no longer a blocker, but it tends to annoy folks. rpmlint complains: W: lilypond file-not-utf8 /usr/share/info/music-glossary.info.gz This is odd because music-glossary.tely explicitly says: @documentencoding utf-8 I'm not completely sure what should be done here; there are a few international characters in that file; you could try running iconv -f iso-8859-1 -t utf-8 music-glossary.info > music-glossary.info.utf8 mv music-glossary.info.utf8 music-glossary.info in $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_infodir}. You should consider ghosting the .pyo files instead of shipping them in the package. Nothing in the input directory seems to be shipped. Might it be worth it to package these up in an -examples subpackage or something like that? I noticed this in the build.log; I wonder if this indicates a problem: Compiling fdl.texi... fdl.texi is up to date. lilypond-book.py: warning: option --psfonts not used lilypond-book.py: warning: processing with dvips will have no fonts DVIPS usage: dvips -h ./out/lilypond.psfonts ./out/lilypond.dvi lilypond-book.py (GNU LilyPond) @TOPLEVEL_VERSION@ Perhaps I'm just missing something, but I'm not seeing the installed menual. I see a few relatively small info files but for some reason I thought lilypond had an impressively large manual. Is it all contained in a few info files or is something being left out? Review: * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible; license text is included in the package. * source files match upstream: 7053cad744c6c62d5895983b67220e26 lilypond-2.8.2.tar.gz 7053cad744c6c62d5895983b67220e26 lilypond-2.8.2.tar.gz-srpm * latest version is being packaged. O BuildRequires are proper (well, perhaps gcc-c++ could go) * package builds in mock (FC5, x86_64). X rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane. O shared libraries are present, but they are internal to the Python interface and so ldconfig does not need to be run. * package is not relocatable. * owns the directories it creates. O doesn't own any directories it shouldn't (owns /usr/share/emacs/site-lisp and /usr/share/vim/vim70, but this is acceptable). * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * %clean is present. O %check is not present. There seems to be some sort of regression test, but I'm not sure how you'd run it. * scriptlets are present and sane. * code, not content. ? not sure about the documentation at this point. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no libtool .la droppings. X Python .pyo files are present and not ghosted. * not a GUI app. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 15 20:48:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 16:48:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188445] Review Request: bootconf In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605152048.k4FKmuRe006220@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bootconf https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188445 ------- Additional Comments From mdehaan at redhat.com 2006-05-15 16:48 EST ------- I am not saying to use grubby or booty instead if a graphical app is desired by you, but rather that grubby/booty achieves important bootloader independance and more robust/safe editing of /etc/grub.conf -- and should be used as a backend if this app is to be released. For the record, anaconda uses booty. That's all I'm going to add on this one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 15 20:51:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 16:51:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191303] Review Request: crossfire - 2D multiplayer rpg game server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605152051.k4FKpcWW007235@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: crossfire - 2D multiplayer rpg game server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191303 ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2006-05-15 16:51 EST ------- Updated package that now includes crossfire-client-images, but doesn't fix the crash when loading the python plugin on FC-5. http://www.kobold.org/~wart/fedora/crossfire.spec http://www.kobold.org/~wart/fedora/crossfire-1.9.0-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 15 20:56:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 16:56:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191305] Review Request: crossfire-client-images - Images for the crossfire client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605152056.k4FKuZfQ008060@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: crossfire-client-images - Images for the crossfire client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191305 wart at kobold.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2006-05-15 16:56 EST ------- This package is now provided by the base crossfire package (#191303). I'd prefer to keep it as a separate package so that it can be noarch, but that won't be done until upstream decides to include a more recent -client-images tarball. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 15 20:56:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 16:56:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191304] Review Request: crossfire-client - Client programs for the crossfire game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605152056.k4FKulh7008122@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: crossfire-client - Client programs for the crossfire game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191304 Bug 191304 depends on bug 191305, which changed state. Bug 191305 Summary: Review Request: crossfire-client-images - Images for the crossfire client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191305 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |WONTFIX Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 15 21:22:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 17:22:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189375] Re-Review Request: Maelstrom: space combat game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605152122.k4FLM1o3014934@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Re-Review Request: Maelstrom: space combat game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189375 ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2006-05-15 17:21 EST ------- (In reply to comment #7) > * There is a questionable clause in the COPYING file: > "The artwork and sounds used by Maelstrom are copyright Ambrosia Software > (http://www.ambrosiasw.com) and may not be redistributed separately from > the Maelstrom public GPL release." You should query upstream and ask them to clarify this license clause. It would be cleanest if they were willing to remove it altogether. See the discussion on fedora-extras-list: https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-extras-list/2006-May/msg00365.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 15 21:23:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 17:23:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 185606] Template file for libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605152123.k4FLNHP2015377@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Template file for libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=185606 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com Severity|enhancement |normal Keywords| |FutureFeature ville.skytta at iki.fi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Keywords| |FutureFeature Resolution| |ERRATA Fixed In Version| |1.6-1 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2006-05-15 17:23 EST ------- Included in 1.6-1, which will soon hit the repos. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 15 22:20:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 18:20:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 183912] Review Request: jack-audio-connection-kit - The Jack Audio Connection Kit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605152220.k4FMKeCe025328@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jack-audio-connection-kit - The Jack Audio Connection Kit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183912 ------- Additional Comments From seg at haxxed.com 2006-05-15 18:20 EST ------- I'm using your Qjackctl package. Yeah, I've tried the unlock toolkit option and it doesn't really seem to help much... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 15 22:39:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 18:39:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 186892] Review Request: conntrack - Tool to manipulate netfilter connection tracking table In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605152239.k4FMducF030647@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: conntrack - Tool to manipulate netfilter connection tracking table https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=186892 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-05-15 18:39 EST ------- Here's a review: OK - Rpmlint output. (none) OK - Package name. OK - Spec file name matches. OK - Package guidelines. OK - License (GPL) OK - License field matches in spec. OK - License included in files OK - Spec in american english OK - Spec legible OK - Md5sum of source from upstream 7491f914a9ebce180df88cbef0d994b3 conntrack-1.00beta1.tar.bz2 7491f914a9ebce180df88cbef0d994b3 conntrack-1.00beta1.tar.bz2.1 OK - Compiles and builds on one arch at least. (builds ok on devel, didn't use mock as not all requires are pushed out) OK - No Forbidden buildrequires included OK - All required buildrequires included OK - Owns all directories it creates. OK - No duplicate files in %files listing. OK - Permissions on files correct. OK - Clean section correct. OK - Macros consistant. OK - Code not content. OK - Docs must not affect runtime. OK - Doesn't own any files/dirs that are already owned by others. No blockers I can see... so this package is APPROVED. Remember to close this bug with NEXTRELEASE once you have imported and build the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 15 22:59:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 18:59:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191509] Review Request: perl-Test-Portability-Files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605152259.k4FMx1c7003242@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-Portability-Files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191509 steve at silug.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From steve at silug.org 2006-05-15 18:58 EST ------- Imported into CVS, branches created, and builds done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 15 22:59:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 18:59:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191516] Review Request: perl-Pod-Readme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605152259.k4FMxDag003292@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Pod-Readme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191516 Bug 191516 depends on bug 191509, which changed state. Bug 191509 Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-Portability-Files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191509 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 15 22:59:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 18:59:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191516] Review Request: perl-Pod-Readme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605152259.k4FMxrpo003420@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Pod-Readme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191516 steve at silug.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From steve at silug.org 2006-05-15 18:59 EST ------- Imported into CVS, branches created, and builds done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 15 23:32:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 19:32:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188180] Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605152332.k4FNWQdB010615@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188180 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-05-15 19:32 EST ------- Spec Name or Url: http://kde-redhat.unl.edu/apt/kde-redhat/SPECS/qt4-4.1.2-16.spec SRPM Name or Url: http://kde-redhat.unl.edu/apt/kde-redhat/all/SRPMS.stable/qt4-4.1.2-16.src.rpm %changelog * Sun May 15 2006 Rex Dieter 4.1.2-16 - set/use RPM_OPT_FLAGS only for our platform - (really) don't give %%_bindir symlink for qt3to4 another "4" suffix - don't add 4 suffix to uic3, rcc (they don't conflict with qt(3)-devel) - -devel: add linguist.desktop - -doc: move assistant here, Provides: %%{name}-assistant, add assistant.desktop - -doc: add qtdemo.desktop - -doc: Requires qt4 (instead of qt4-devel) - assistant4.patch: search for assistant4 instead of (qt3's) assistant in $PATH - -qtconfig: add qtconfig.desktop - updated %%sumaries to mention where (some) tools are, including assistant, linguist, qtdemo -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 15 23:39:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 19:39:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 185370] Review Request: gtklp - A GTK frontend to CUPS In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605152339.k4FNd8YH012231@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtklp - A GTK frontend to CUPS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=185370 ------- Additional Comments From gemi at bluewin.ch 2006-05-15 19:39 EST ------- Is this still APPROVED, and should I go ahead with modifications I suggested? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 15 23:39:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 19:39:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188176] Review Request: gauche-gtk - Gauche extension module to use GTK In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605152339.k4FNdtAP012488@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gauche-gtk - Gauche extension module to use GTK https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188176 gemi at bluewin.ch changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From gemi at bluewin.ch 2006-05-15 19:39 EST ------- Built on FC-4, FC-5 and FC-6. Added to owners.list. Thanks for the review! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 15 23:42:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 19:42:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191619] Review Request: perl-CSS-Tiny - Read/Write .css files with as little code as possible In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605152342.k4FNgELX013411@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-CSS-Tiny - Read/Write .css files with as little code as possible https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191619 jpo at di.uminho.pt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From jpo at di.uminho.pt 2006-05-15 19:42 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > Everything looks good; the only thing I question is the reason for including > test.css as %doc. It seems a bit pointless to me, but I guess it doesn't hurt > anything. Indeed. I could swear it was a CSS example with more juicy. I will remove next update. Imported and built for FC-5 and devel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 15 23:42:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 19:42:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191620] Review Request: perl-PPI-HTML - Generate syntax-hightlighted HTML for Perl using PPI In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605152342.k4FNgF0u013429@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-PPI-HTML - Generate syntax-hightlighted HTML for Perl using PPI https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191620 Bug 191620 depends on bug 191619, which changed state. Bug 191619 Summary: Review Request: perl-CSS-Tiny - Read/Write .css files with as little code as possible https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191619 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 15 23:44:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 19:44:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191620] Review Request: perl-PPI-HTML - Generate syntax-hightlighted HTML for Perl using PPI In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605152344.k4FNinjl014083@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-PPI-HTML - Generate syntax-hightlighted HTML for Perl using PPI https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191620 jpo at di.uminho.pt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From jpo at di.uminho.pt 2006-05-15 19:44 EST ------- Thanks for the review. Imported and built for FC-5 and devel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 16 00:11:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 20:11:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191553] Review Request: crossfire-maps - map files for the crossfire game server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605160011.k4G0BBCB019870@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: crossfire-maps - map files for the crossfire game server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191553 ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2006-05-15 20:10 EST ------- * rpmlint output W: crossfire-maps no-documentation W: crossfire-maps hidden-file-or-dir /usr/share/crossfire/maps/.emergency W: crossfire-maps-devel no-documentation - No documention warnings okay. - .emergency file is okay I guess, rpmlint says to check if it's normal and delete it if it's not. The .emergency file looks like it's part of the world/ map stuff, but I cannot determine if it's needed. I'm giving the benefit of the doubt and saying it's needed. * Package meets Package Naming Guidelines * spec file match base package %{name} * Package meets Package Guidelines * Package licensed with open source license * License matches crossfire license * No license file in source package * Spec file in American English * Spec file legible * Souces match upstream 265c4dfdbdedaa2c565ea831f5f74a0c crossfire-1.9.0-1.maps.tar.gz 265c4dfdbdedaa2c565ea831f5f74a0c crossfire-1.9.0-1.maps.tar.gz * Package builds under mock for FC5 x86_64 * No BuildRequires needed * Package does not use locales * Package does not contain any shared libraries * Package is not relocatable * Package owns the directories it creates * No duplicate files in %files * All files have appropriate %defattr settings * %clean section present * Macro usage consistant * Package contains permissible content * Package does not contain large documentation to warrent a -doc package * No files in %doc affect runtime * Package does not contain headers or static libraries, or .pc files * Package does not contain any .so files * devel package contains fully versioned dependency on base package * Package does not contain any .la files * Package does not need a .desktop file * Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages *** APPROVED *** Non-Blocking SHOULDs: - SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. - SHOULD: Check hidden file .emergency to see if it is really required. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 16 00:12:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 20:12:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191553] Review Request: crossfire-maps - map files for the crossfire game server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605160012.k4G0CT7L020009@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: crossfire-maps - map files for the crossfire game server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191553 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 16 00:23:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 20:23:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191667] Review Request: poker-engine - Python library that implements poker rules In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605160023.k4G0NIoI022345@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: poker-engine - Python library that implements poker rules https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191667 ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2006-05-15 20:23 EST ------- Spec URL: http://tkmame.retrogames.com/fedora-extras/poker-engine.spec SRPM URL: http://tkmame.retrogames.com/fedora-extras/poker-engine-1.0.14-3.src.rpm *** NOTE *** You may have to download the src.rpm from http://tkmame.retrogames.com/fedora-extras/ %changelog * Mon May 15 2006 Christopher Stone - 1.0.14-3 - Add Requires pypoker-eval-devel to devel package -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 16 00:23:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 20:23:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191553] Review Request: crossfire-maps - map files for the crossfire game server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605160023.k4G0NooY022468@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: crossfire-maps - map files for the crossfire game server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191553 ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2006-05-15 20:23 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > Non-Blocking SHOULDs: > - SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate > file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. I've notified upstream: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1489214&group_id=13833&atid=113833 > - SHOULD: Check hidden file .emergency to see if it is really required. It's used by common/init.c as a fallback for various map-related problems. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 16 02:43:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 22:43:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191304] Review Request: crossfire-client - Client programs for the crossfire game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605160243.k4G2hg7h020194@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: crossfire-client - Client programs for the crossfire game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191304 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2006-05-15 22:43 EST ------- * rpmlint output clean * Package named according to Package Naming Guidelines * Spec file matches base package %{name} * Package meets packaging guidelines * License is open source compatible * License matches actual license * License file contained in %doc * Spec file in American English * Spec file is legible * Source file matches upstream 62a9ac007700d1d811fa097fe6790f7a crossfire-client-1.9.0.tar.gz 62a9ac007700d1d811fa097fe6790f7a crossfire-client-1.9.0.tar.gz * Package successfully builds for FC5 x86_64 * All build dependencies listed in Build Requires * Package does not contain locales * Package does not contain any shared libraries * Package is not relocatable * Package owns the directories it creates * No duplicate files in %files * %files contains acceptable %defattr settings * Package contains acceptable %clean section * Macro use is consistant * Package contains permissible code * No large amounts of documentation for a -doc package * Files in %doc do not affect run time of application * No header files or static libraries. or .pc files present * No .so files present * No devel package built * No .la files present * Package include .desktop file - Should probably use %{name}.desktop * Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages *** APPROVED *** Non-Blocking SHOULDS: - Contact upstream about sound problem (I'm assuming you already have done this) - Contact upstream about -images package (Noted that you have done this) - Build -sounds package when sound is working (Probably already on your TODO list) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 16 02:47:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 22:47:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191304] Review Request: crossfire-client - Client programs for the crossfire game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605160247.k4G2lZAK021363@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: crossfire-client - Client programs for the crossfire game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191304 ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2006-05-15 22:47 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > Non-Blocking SHOULDS: > - Contact upstream about sound problem (I'm assuming you already have done this) > - Contact upstream about -images package (Noted that you have done this) > - Build -sounds package when sound is working (Probably already on your TODO list) I had originally left sound support in, but upstream told me that it's broken on 2.6 kernels, so I turned it off. It sounds like they plan to use SDL for sound at some unspecified time in the future. I definitely plan on adding support for sound once it works again. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 16 03:58:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 23:58:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189656] Review Request: lilypond - A typesetting system for music notation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605160358.k4G3wL1K007041@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lilypond - A typesetting system for music notation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189656 ------- Additional Comments From qspencer at ieee.org 2006-05-15 23:58 EST ------- I'll take care of the c++ dependency and the ghosted pyo files, and I'll see if your suggestion fixes the encoding on the info file. The remaining issue is the documentation. lilypond does indeed have a very large set of documentation, which is created by running "make web" in the build directory. The problem is that it will fail about half way through unless you have ghostscript 8.5. Both FC5 and devel have 8.15.x. I had hoped that FC6 would update to have 8.5, but it still hasn't changed in devel. Other than building the docs, I don't see this as a huge problem as it's really just a couple of cases, and lilypond is otherwise 99% functional with ghostscript 8.15. Anyway, my thinking was that I would just leave out the docs until ghostscript could build them and then add them as a subpackage later on. However, the docs are available as a separate tarball from the lilypond web site, so I suppose I could just include it in the SRPM for the time being, but it is 24 MB. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 16 04:40:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 00:40:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190243] Review Request: scim-bridge (gtkimm module in C) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605160440.k4G4e1l0016082@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scim-bridge (gtkimm module in C) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190243 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2006-05-16 00:39 EST ------- http://people.redhat.com/petersen/extras/scim-bridge.spec http://people.redhat.com/petersen/extras/scim-bridge-0.1.8-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 16 06:57:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 02:57:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191682] add/remove software failed to open. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605160657.k4G6vRlG011509@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: add/remove software failed to open. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191682 ------- Additional Comments From tla at rasmil.dk 2006-05-16 02:57 EST ------- you have used wrong component, use pirut -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 16 07:13:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 03:13:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177818] Review Request: adplug In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605160713.k4G7DcAv014907@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: adplug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177818 ------- Additional Comments From triad at df.lth.se 2006-05-16 03:13 EST ------- OK, added --disable-rpath, imported and built successfully for devel, FC-4, FC-5. THANKS JOHN, for making this possible! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 16 07:15:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 03:15:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177818] Review Request: adplug In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605160715.k4G7F6Dk015354@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: adplug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177818 triad at df.lth.se changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 16 07:15:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 03:15:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 178360] Review Request: xmms-adplug In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605160715.k4G7FK5Y015442@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xmms-adplug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=178360 Bug 178360 depends on bug 177818, which changed state. Bug 177818 Summary: Review Request: adplug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177818 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 16 07:15:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 03:15:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177865] Review Request: adplay In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605160715.k4G7FWv2015476@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: adplay https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177865 Bug 177865 depends on bug 177818, which changed state. Bug 177818 Summary: Review Request: adplug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177818 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 16 07:17:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 03:17:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 178360] Review Request: xmms-adplug In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605160717.k4G7HRk4016050@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xmms-adplug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=178360 ------- Additional Comments From triad at df.lth.se 2006-05-16 03:17 EST ------- OK the dependant package adplug has been imported and built so this may be reviewed now Warren. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 16 07:58:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 03:58:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189322] Review Request: rosegarden4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605160758.k4G7wOMV028783@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rosegarden4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189322 ------- Additional Comments From seg at haxxed.com 2006-05-16 03:58 EST ------- Okay, so I tried building rosegarden against jack, and now the timer setting will stick, and /proc/asound/seq confirms it is actually using the RTC timer, however it STILL complains about the system timer resolution on startup. Bleh. I'm going to hold off on updates until its various (supposedly) optional dependencies are accepted. Looks like liblo was accepted, and I'm working on reviewing jack. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 16 08:31:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 04:31:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188180] Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605160831.k4G8Vqqd005399@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188180 ------- Additional Comments From frank-buettner at gmx.net 2006-05-16 04:31 EST ------- Trolltech will release Qt 4.1.3 shortly. I think you shut wait 3 or 4 days for Qt 4.1.3. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 16 08:34:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 04:34:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191745] Review Request: sysprof-kmod - kernel module for the sysprof profiler In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605160834.k4G8Y8CO005990@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sysprof-kmod - kernel module for the sysprof profiler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191745 giallu at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: sysprof-kmod|Review Request: sysprof-kmod |- kernel module for the |- kernel module for the |sysprof profiler |sysprof profiler ------- Additional Comments From giallu at gmail.com 2006-05-16 04:34 EST ------- I updated the spec to remove some diffs from the standard template: Spec URL: http://giallu.interfree.it/fedora/sysprof-kmod.spec SRPM URL: http://giallu.interfree.it/fedora/sysprof-kmod-1.0.2-2.2.6.16_1.2111_FC5.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 16 08:34:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 04:34:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188180] Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605160834.k4G8YCVe006017@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188180 ------- Additional Comments From frank-buettner at gmx.net 2006-05-16 04:34 EST ------- Trolltech will release Qt 4.1.3 shortly. I think you shut wait 3 or 4 days for Qt 4.1.3. The changes cann be view here: http://www.trolltech.com/developer/notes/changes/changes-4.1.3/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 16 08:40:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 04:40:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189322] Review Request: rosegarden4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605160840.k4G8ehnL008140@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rosegarden4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189322 seg at haxxed.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn|183912 |189892 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 16 08:41:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 04:41:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189892] Review Request: dssi - Disposable Soft Synth Interface In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605160841.k4G8f0Jk008316@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dssi - Disposable Soft Synth Interface https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189892 seg at haxxed.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |189322 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 16 08:41:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 04:41:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 183912] Review Request: jack-audio-connection-kit - The Jack Audio Connection Kit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605160841.k4G8fEcq008412@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jack-audio-connection-kit - The Jack Audio Connection Kit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183912 seg at haxxed.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|189322 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 16 08:43:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 04:43:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189322] Review Request: rosegarden4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605160843.k4G8ht4R009312@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rosegarden4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189322 seg at haxxed.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |183912 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 16 08:44:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 04:44:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 183912] Review Request: jack-audio-connection-kit - The Jack Audio Connection Kit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605160844.k4G8i47l009385@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jack-audio-connection-kit - The Jack Audio Connection Kit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183912 seg at haxxed.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |189322 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 16 09:24:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 05:24:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191473] Review Request: kdiff3: Compare + merge 2 or 3 files or directories In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605160924.k4G9OTRI021033@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdiff3: Compare + merge 2 or 3 files or directories https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191473 ------- Additional Comments From laurent.rineau__fc_extra at normalesup.org 2006-05-16 05:24 EST ------- Since today I can do official reviews. I would be pleased to do my first officiel review with kdiff3. However, I do think that you have no sponsor. Can you confirm, Neal? I cannot sponsor someone, I can just do review. Please read again http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/Contributors and search for the word sponsor. If you have no sponsor, and it seems not, you have to add FE-NEEDSPONSOR in the "blocks" list of all your review requests. You should have tell that in the description of your review (I made the same mistake with my first review request). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 16 10:23:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 06:23:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188180] Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605161023.k4GANnXi002511@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188180 ------- Additional Comments From laurent.rineau__fc_extra at normalesup.org 2006-05-16 06:23 EST ------- (In reply to comment #67) Nice changelog! A lot of things to check. I have compiled it without error nor warning. rpmlint still says: W: qt4-devel dangling-relative-symlink /usr/lib64/qt4/doc ../../share/doc/qt4-devel-4.1.2 I think that this doc symlink should be in the -doc subpackage. Another rpmlint complain: W: qt4-doc devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/qt4/demos/textedit/textedit.h should be ignored, I think. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 16 10:25:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 06:25:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191473] Review Request: kdiff3: Compare + merge 2 or 3 files or directories In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605161025.k4GAPMU2002821@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdiff3: Compare + merge 2 or 3 files or directories https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191473 ------- Additional Comments From ndbecker2 at verizon.net 2006-05-16 06:25 EST ------- Yes, I need a sponsor. I am also waiting for legal clearance from my employer (I initiated that yesterday). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 16 10:40:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 06:40:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 183912] Review Request: jack-audio-connection-kit - The Jack Audio Connection Kit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605161040.k4GAeaYT007200@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jack-audio-connection-kit - The Jack Audio Connection Kit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183912 ------- Additional Comments From seg at haxxed.com 2006-05-16 06:40 EST ------- MUST items: - rpmlint: Ok $ rpmlint jack-audio-connection-kit-example-clients-0.101.1-6.fc5.i386.rpm W: jack-audio-connection-kit-example-clients no-documentation Ignorable. - Package name: Ok - Spec name: Ok - Meets packaging guidelines: Ok - License: NEEDSWORK - Spec in American English: Ok - Spec legible: Ok - Sources match upstream: Ok - Builds: Ok - BuildRequires: Ok - Locales: Ok - ldconfig: Ok - Relocation: Ok - Directory ownership: Ok - %files: Ok - %clean: Ok - Macros: Ok - Code vs. Content: Ok - Documentation: Ok - devel package: Ok - .desktop file: n/a SHOULD: - Includes license text: Yes - Spec translations: Ok? - Mock build: Yes - Builds on all archs: Builds on i386, x86_64 - Package functional: Tested on i386, x86_64 - Scriptlets: Ok - Subpackages: Ok NEEDSWORK: jack is part GPL and part LGPL. The License: line should probably be set to GPL/LGPL --enable-shared isn't really necessary, it should be default. You should add a -p flag to the line that copies README.Fedora, to preserve the timestamp as advised in the packaging guidelines. I notice in the main package there is: %dir %{_libdir}/jack And in the devel package: %{_includedir}/jack Which seems inconsistent. I remember reading a discussion somewhere about the subtleties of directories, but I forget the details. Near as I can tell the directories are properly owned in both, is there a difference? I would get rid of the %dir tag unless there's a reason for it I'm not aware of. And its also a good idea to put trailing slashes on directories in %files, to make it more apparent its specifying a directory. Fix these minor issues and this package is approve-able in my opinion. I am not a sponsor so I can't give final approval. Or sponsor. ;P Okay so its now 5:45am the next day. I'm going to bed. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 16 10:54:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 06:54:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 183912] Review Request: jack-audio-connection-kit - The Jack Audio Connection Kit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605161054.k4GAssJx011325@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jack-audio-connection-kit - The Jack Audio Connection Kit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183912 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-05-16 06:54 EST ------- (In reply to comment #38) > I notice in the main package there is: > > %dir %{_libdir}/jack > > And in the devel package: > > %{_includedir}/jack > > Which seems inconsistent. I remember reading a discussion somewhere about the > subtleties of directories, but I forget the details. Near as I can tell the > directories are properly owned in both, is there a difference? I would get rid > of the %dir tag unless there's a reason for it I'm not aware of. The %dir tag means "include the directory but not the directory's contents". It's used where you don't want all of a directory's contents in a package, e.g. if some of the contents belong in a sub-package rather than the main package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 16 11:39:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 07:39:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191473] Review Request: kdiff3: Compare + merge 2 or 3 files or directories In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605161139.k4GBd4eC022725@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdiff3: Compare + merge 2 or 3 files or directories https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191473 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 16 11:43:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 07:43:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188180] Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605161143.k4GBh6er023842@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188180 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-05-16 07:43 EST ------- > I think that this doc symlink should be in the -doc subpackage. Include a symlink to a dir that doesn't nessesarily exist? (Remember, -doc doesn't Requires: qt-devel anymore). I'll update to 4.1.3 as soon as it is released, whether that is before or after package is APPROVED. Please don't postpone review(s) for that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 16 12:28:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 08:28:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187243] Review Request: lazarus : IDE and RAD tool for the free pascal compiler (fpc) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605161228.k4GCSu07002848@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lazarus : IDE and RAD tool for the free pascal compiler (fpc) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187243 ------- Additional Comments From joost at cnoc.nl 2006-05-16 08:28 EST ------- Added the ability to compile gtk 2 applications: Spec: http://www.cnoc.nl/fpc/lazarus.spec SRPM: http://www.cnoc.nl/fpc/lazarus-0.9.14-3.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 16 12:37:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 08:37:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191473] Review Request: kdiff3: Compare + merge 2 or 3 files or directories In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605161237.k4GCb63q006575@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdiff3: Compare + merge 2 or 3 files or directories https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191473 ------- Additional Comments From laurent.rineau__fc_extra at normalesup.org 2006-05-16 08:36 EST ------- %{_datadir}/doc/qt4-devel-4.1.2/ is not owned by any package, actually. But qt4-doc fills it by creating %{_datadir}/doc/qt4-devel-4.1.2/html/. Maybe something is wrong, actually. But I think that the symlink %{qtdir}/doc should be in -doc, because the directory pointed by it (whatever it is) is filled only by -doc. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 16 12:39:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 08:39:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188180] Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605161239.k4GCdYnE007518@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188180 ------- Additional Comments From laurent.rineau__fc_extra at normalesup.org 2006-05-16 08:39 EST ------- %{_datadir}/doc/qt4-devel-4.1.2/ is not owned by any package, actually. But qt4-doc fills it by creating %{_datadir}/doc/qt4-devel-4.1.2/html/. Maybe something is wrong, actually. But I think that the symlink %{qtdir}/doc should be in -doc, because the directory pointed by it (whatever it is) is filled only by -doc. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 16 12:42:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 08:42:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188180] Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605161242.k4GCgcwU008459@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188180 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-05-16 08:42 EST ------- OK, you have a point. If it's not *in* qt4-devel anymore, there's not much point putting it at %{_datadir}/doc/qt4-devel-* -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 16 12:52:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 08:52:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191473] Review Request: kdiff3: Compare + merge 2 or 3 files or directories In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605161252.k4GCqxfW011415@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdiff3: Compare + merge 2 or 3 files or directories https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191473 ------- Additional Comments From laurent.rineau__fc_extra at normalesup.org 2006-05-16 08:52 EST ------- ...! Please ignore comment #25. Obviously it is not for this bug. Where is the cancel button?! :-( -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 16 13:01:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 09:01:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191492] Review Request: unuran-0.7.2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605161301.k4GD1O21014287@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: unuran-0.7.2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191492 laurent.rineau__fc_extra at normalesup.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |laurent.rineau__fc_extra at nor | |malesup.org OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From laurent.rineau__fc_extra at normalesup.org 2006-05-16 09:01 EST ------- Mass-block FE-NEEDSPONSOR for the six review requests of Neal Becker. Neal, when you get sponsorship, you will have to unblock it for all your requests. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 16 13:10:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 09:10:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188180] Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605161310.k4GDAut5016581@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188180 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-05-16 09:10 EST ------- Any opinions on where to put qt_docdir? I think we can agree it, and %qtdir/doc symlink, should be owned by -doc. How about: %define qt_docdir %{_datadir}/doc/qt4-doc-4.1.2/html/ ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 16 13:14:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 09:14:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191402] Review Request: mercurial-0.9 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605161314.k4GDEVMZ017399@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mercurial-0.9 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191402 laurent.rineau__fc_extra at normalesup.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |laurent.rineau__fc_extra at nor | |malesup.org OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From laurent.rineau__fc_extra at normalesup.org 2006-05-16 09:14 EST ------- Mass-block FE-NEEDSPONSOR for the six review requests? of Neal Becker. Neal, when you get sponsorship, you will have to unblock it for all your requests. ?)?Actually the four that do not block yet FE-NEEDSPONSOR. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 16 13:15:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 09:15:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188477] Review Request: maildrop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605161315.k4GDF8Y8017820@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: maildrop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188477 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|fedora-extras- |fedora-package- |list at redhat.com |review at redhat.com laurent.rineau__fc_extra at normalesup.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |laurent.rineau__fc_extra at nor | |malesup.org OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From laurent.rineau__fc_extra at normalesup.org 2006-05-16 09:15 EST ------- Mass-block FE-NEEDSPONSOR for the six review requests? of Neal Becker. Neal, when you get sponsorship, you will have to unblock it for all your requests. ?)?Actually the four that do not block yet FE-NEEDSPONSOR. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 16 13:15:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 09:15:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188482] Review Request: scipy-0.4.8 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605161315.k4GDFsHs018190@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scipy-0.4.8 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188482 laurent.rineau__fc_extra at normalesup.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |laurent.rineau__fc_extra at nor | |malesup.org OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From laurent.rineau__fc_extra at normalesup.org 2006-05-16 09:15 EST ------- Mass-block FE-NEEDSPONSOR for the six review requests? of Neal Becker. Neal, when you get sponsorship, you will have to unblock it for all your requests. ?)?Actually the four that do not block yet FE-NEEDSPONSOR. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 16 13:16:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 09:16:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188478] Review Request: fxload-2002_04_11.spec In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605161316.k4GDGSdm018305@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fxload-2002_04_11.spec https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188478 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|fedora-extras- |fedora-package- |list at redhat.com |review at redhat.com laurent.rineau__fc_extra at normalesup.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |laurent.rineau__fc_extra at nor | |malesup.org OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From laurent.rineau__fc_extra at normalesup.org 2006-05-16 09:16 EST ------- Mass-block FE-NEEDSPONSOR for the six review requests? of Neal Becker. Neal, when you get sponsorship, you will have to unblock it for all your requests. ?)?Actually the four that do not block yet FE-NEEDSPONSOR. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 16 13:32:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 09:32:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187622] Review Request: cowbell In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605161332.k4GDWKTm023348@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cowbell https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187622 foolish at guezz.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 16 13:34:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 09:34:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188180] Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605161334.k4GDY3xL023810@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188180 ------- Additional Comments From dennis at ausil.us 2006-05-16 09:34 EST ------- Sounds sane to me -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 16 14:13:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 10:13:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191922] New: Review Request: dbus-qt: Qt-based library for using D-BUS Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191922 Summary: Review Request: dbus-qt: Qt-based library for using D- BUS Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: rdieter at math.unl.edu QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com FC-5: Spec URL: http://kde-redhat.unl.edu/apt/kde-redhat/SPECS/dbus-qt-0.61.spec SRPM URL: http://kde-redhat.unl.edu/apt/kde-redhat/SRPMS/dbus-qt-0.61-1.src.rpm FC-4: Spec URL: http://kde-redhat.unl.edu/apt/kde-redhat/SPECS/dbus-qt-0.33.spec SRPM URL: http://kde-redhat.unl.edu/apt/kde-redhat/SRPMS/dbus-qt-0.33-4.src.rpm Description: D-BUS add-on library to integrate the standard D-BUS library with the Qt3 thread abstraction and main loop -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 16 14:25:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 10:25:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188482] Review Request: scipy-0.4.8 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605161425.k4GEPWDG008848@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scipy-0.4.8 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188482 ------- Additional Comments From ed at eh3.com 2006-05-16 10:25 EST ------- Hi Neal, this is still not a complete review but we have at this point covered a number of the review items. good: + builds in mock on FC5 i386 + dir ownership appears to be OK + permissions look OK needswork: - rpmlint returns 168 errors/warnings of which 167 are: 126 are devel-file-in-non-devel-package 39 are non-executable-script 2 are script-without-shellbang and these can probably be safely ignored. The one remaining warning is: W: scipy summary-ended-with-dot Scipy: array processing for numbers, strings, records, and objects. and you can easily fix it. questions: 1) There are a number of files in directories of the form %{python_sitearch}/scipy/*/tests/* and %{python_sitearch}/scipy/*/examples/* Perhaps they should go in sub-packages such as scipy-test and scipy-docs or similar? Whats your opinion of putting them in sub-packages? 2) What is your sponsorship status? Are any of the other packages you submitted closer to passing review? I'm just a little leery about sponsoring you since I'm not familiar with any of the other packages and just don't have enough free time to learn about them. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 16 14:39:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 10:39:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191922] Review Request: dbus-qt: Qt-based library for using D-BUS In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605161439.k4GEdpim015774@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dbus-qt: Qt-based library for using D-BUS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191922 dennis at ausil.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |dennis at ausil.us OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163779 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 16 14:50:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 10:50:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 185370] Review Request: gtklp - A GTK frontend to CUPS In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605161450.k4GEokWB021430@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtklp - A GTK frontend to CUPS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=185370 ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2006-05-16 10:50 EST ------- (In reply to comment #6) > Is this still APPROVED, and should I go ahead with modifications > I suggested? Still approved. Go ahead with the locale fix, you can get further review before on it before building if you wish. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 16 14:56:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 10:56:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191922] Review Request: dbus-qt: Qt-based library for using D-BUS In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605161456.k4GEu4Ph023489@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dbus-qt: Qt-based library for using D-BUS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191922 ------- Additional Comments From dennis at ausil.us 2006-05-16 10:55 EST ------- Getting a 403 error on the SRPMS dir -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 16 15:04:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 11:04:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190949] Review Request: gaim-gaym In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605161504.k4GF4ql6026375@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gaim-gaym https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190949 noa at resare.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From noa at resare.com 2006-05-16 11:03 EST ------- With my newly recieved blessing powers I'd like to exclaim +1 Publish! I have also tested build on fc5/x86_64 and it works as expected -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 16 15:15:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 11:15:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189013] Review Request: python-sqlalchemy - Modular and flexible ORM library for python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605161515.k4GFF8pl030688@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-sqlalchemy - Modular and flexible ORM library for python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189013 jpmahowald at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |jpmahowald at gmail.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2006-05-16 11:14 EST ------- - rpmlint checks return: W: python-sqlalchemy wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/python-sqlalchemy-0.1.6/doc/build/content/tutorial.txt E: python-sqlalchemy wrong-script-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/python-sqlalchemy-0.1.6/doc/build/runhtml.py W: python-sqlalchemy wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/python-sqlalchemy-0.1.6/doc/build/testdocs.py W: python-sqlalchemy wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/python-sqlalchemy-0.1.6/doc/build/txt2myt.py Easily fixed with sed or perl. W: python-sqlalchemy doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/python-sqlalchemy-0.1.6/doc/build/runhtml.py /usr/bin/env python will be installed, so this should be fine. - package meets naming guidelines - package meets packaging guidelines - license (MIT) OK, text in %doc, matches source - spec file legible, in am. english - source matches upstream Change source URL to download.sourceforge.net however, to automate downloads. - package compiles on FC5 (x86_64) - no missing BR - no unnecessary BR - no locales - not relocatable - owns all directories that it creates - no duplicate files - permissions ok - %clean ok - macro use consistent - code, not content - no need for -docs - no need for .desktop file doc web server script thing doesn't work. $ ./runhtml.py : No such file or directory This is end of line problem as mentioned previously. Also, these scripts seem to convert and write html files, which fails due to permissions. You could generate this html in your %install phase, elminating the need for these scripts. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 16 15:17:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 11:17:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191922] Review Request: dbus-qt: Qt-based library for using D-BUS In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605161517.k4GFHjNe031908@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dbus-qt: Qt-based library for using D-BUS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191922 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-05-16 11:17 EST ------- Oops, bad urls. FC-5: Spec URL: http://kde-redhat.unl.edu/apt/kde-redhat/SPECS/dbus-qt-0.61.spec SRPM URL: http://kde-redhat.unl.edu/apt/kde-redhat/all/SRPMS.stable/dbus-qt-0.61-1.src.rpm FC-4: Spec URL: http://kde-redhat.unl.edu/apt/kde-redhat/SPECS/dbus-qt-0.33.spec SRPM URL: http://kde-redhat.unl.edu/apt/kde-redhat/all/SRPMS.stable/dbus-qt-0.33-4.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 16 15:26:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 11:26:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191922] Review Request: dbus-qt: Qt-based library for using D-BUS In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605161526.k4GFQ192003088@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dbus-qt: Qt-based library for using D-BUS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191922 ------- Additional Comments From dennis at ausil.us 2006-05-16 11:25 EST ------- ./configure: line 26644: ./po/POTFILES.in: No such file or directory checking for XML_ParserCreate_MM in -lexpat... no checking for libxml-2.0... configure: error: No XML library found, check config.log for failed attempts error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.32594 (%build) there is a missing BuildRequires: libxml2-devel -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 16 15:29:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 11:29:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191922] Review Request: dbus-qt: Qt-based library for using D-BUS In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605161529.k4GFT14j004350@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dbus-qt: Qt-based library for using D-BUS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191922 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-05-16 11:28 EST ------- ??? It's there in my copy of dbus-qt-0.61.spec: BuildRequires: qt-devel BuildRequires: libxml2-devel -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 16 15:41:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 11:41:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188180] Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605161541.k4GFfC1D008569@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188180 ------- Additional Comments From laurent.rineau__fc_extra at normalesup.org 2006-05-16 11:40 EST ------- MUST: the desktop files must state that it is Qt?4 tools. In my KDE menu, I've got to identical entries for several tools, now. Some icons, used by the desktop files, seem to belong to the kdebase package. I do not know what would happen if this package was removed (would it find some other icons, or non icons at all?). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 16 15:52:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 11:52:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188180] Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605161552.k4GFqKiF011925@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188180 ------- Additional Comments From laurent.rineau__fc_extra at normalesup.org 2006-05-16 11:52 EST ------- (In reply to comment #74) > Any opinions on where to put qt_docdir? I think we can agree it, and %qtdir/doc > symlink, should be owned by -doc. How about: > %define qt_docdir %{_datadir}/doc/qt4-doc-4.1.2/html/ > ? Why not "%define qt_docdir %{_datadir}/%{qt_dirname}/doc"? IMHO it seems more simple. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 16 16:04:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 12:04:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188180] Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605161604.k4GG4PS6015996@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188180 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-05-16 12:04 EST ------- True, (assuming you *really* mean %qtdir/doc), that's the default location, but (I think) the point is to try to find an ideal location under %_datadir/doc somewhere. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 16 16:09:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 12:09:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188180] Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605161609.k4GG9nrj017769@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188180 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-05-16 12:09 EST ------- Even %{_datadir}/%{qt_dirname}/doc is OK, and I think I like it better than _docdir/qt4-doc-%version because it won't move on every upgrade. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 16 16:13:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 12:13:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191088] Review Request: mlsutils In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605161613.k4GGD2J4018504@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mlsutils https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191088 kaboom at oobleck.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kaboom at oobleck.net ------- Additional Comments From kaboom at oobleck.net 2006-05-16 12:12 EST ------- Actual URLs are: ftp://people.redhat.com/dwalsh/SELinux/mlsutils.spec ftp://people.redhat.com/dwalsh/SELinux/mlsutils-1.1-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 16 16:31:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 12:31:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191968] New: Review Request: phpBB - A php Bulletin Board Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191968 Summary: Review Request: phpBB - A php Bulletin Board Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: imlinux at gmail.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec: http://mmcgrath.net/~mmcgrath/phpBB/phpBB.spec SRPM: http://mmcgrath.net/~mmcgrath/phpBB/phpBB-2.0.20-1.src.rpm Description: phpBB is a high powered, fully scalable, and highly customizable Open Source bulletin board package. phpBB has a user-friendly interface, simple and straightforward administration panel, and helpful FAQ. Based on the powerful PHP server language and your choice of MySQL, MS-SQL, PostgreSQL or Access/ODBC database servers, phpBB is the ideal free community solution for all web sites. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 16 16:38:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 12:38:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189603] Review Request: libgalago In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605161638.k4GGcLD0027384@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgalago https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189603 jpmahowald at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: libgalago |Review Request: libgalago Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |jpmahowald at gmail.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2006-05-16 12:38 EST ------- - rpmlint checks return clean - package meets naming guidelines - package meets packaging guidelines - license (LGPL) OK, text in %doc, matches source - spec file legible, in am. english - source matches upstream - package compiles on FC5 (x86_64) - no missing BR - no unnecessary BR - locales handled with %find_lang - not relocatable - owns all directories that it creates - no duplicate files - permissions ok - %clean ok - macro use consistent - code, not content - no need for -docs - nothing in %doc affects runtime - no need for .desktop file - devel package ok - no .la files - post/postun ldconfig ok - devel requires base package n-v-r * URL redirects to some game page, use http://www.galago-project.org/ * minor typo: againse --> against APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 16 16:39:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 12:39:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189656] Review Request: lilypond - A typesetting system for music notation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605161639.k4GGdd9M028037@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lilypond - A typesetting system for music notation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189656 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-05-16 12:39 EST ------- I think it would be a good idea to package the manual, given that we don't know if GS 8.50 will even be in FC6 and that it will probably never make it into FC4 or FC5. This package has good documentation so it would be a shame to leave it out. It will need to be in a -doc subpackage given its size. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 16 16:45:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 12:45:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189009] Review Request: bzrtools - A collection of utilities and plugins for Bazaar-NG In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605161645.k4GGjOXO030393@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bzrtools - A collection of utilities and plugins for Bazaar-NG https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189009 ------- Additional Comments From shahms at shahms.com 2006-05-16 12:45 EST ------- packages with BR: python are at: http://shahms.mesd.k12.or.us/packages/bzrtools.spec http://shahms.mesd.k12.or.us/packages/bzrtools-0.8.1-3.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 16 16:45:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 12:45:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191968] Review Request: phpBB - A php Bulletin Board In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605161645.k4GGjLrJ030381@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: phpBB - A php Bulletin Board https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191968 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-05-16 12:45 EST ------- See also Bug #188410 for discussion on this application. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 16 16:46:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 12:46:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191968] Review Request: phpBB - A php Bulletin Board In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605161646.k4GGkxXg030814@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: phpBB - A php Bulletin Board https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191968 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tibbs at math.uh.edu ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-05-16 12:46 EST ------- Do you have any comment on the issues raised in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188410 ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 16 17:01:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 13:01:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191603] Review Request: rsnapshot -- rsync-based filesystem snapshots In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605161701.k4GH16pT002911@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rsnapshot -- rsync-based filesystem snapshots https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191603 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tibbs at math.uh.edu ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-05-16 13:00 EST ------- Note that version 1.2.3 seems to be current even though this doesn't seem to be represented at all on rsnapshot.org. Also, the rpmforge packages which I'm currently using apply a single patch to the default config file (before configure has processed it). They uncomment @CMD_CP@, @CMD_DU@, logfile and lockfile. Any opinions on that? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 16 17:01:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 13:01:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189010] Review Request: pybaz - Python library bindings for the GNU Arch/Bazaar RCS In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605161701.k4GH18fa002932@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pybaz - Python library bindings for the GNU Arch/Bazaar RCS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189010 ------- Additional Comments From shahms at shahms.com 2006-05-16 13:00 EST ------- Updated files are at: http://shahms.mesd.k12.or.us/packages/pybaz.spec http://shahms.mesd.k12.or.us/packages/pybaz-1.1-2.src.rpm Yeah, I was having similar repo issues until I manually specified the .noarch package. I'm not exactly sure where the problem is, but I think yum always prefers architecture-specific packages even over newer noarch ones. I've attempted to work around the problem by specifying a BuildRequires on epydoc > 2.1-2. The warnings from make doc can be ignored. The "error" that mentions twisted.internet is because the twisted module isn't installed when it's making the documentation. I wasn't sure how to handle that as it isn't a hard "requires", but rpm has no mechanism for "suggests". In the updated files I have added python-twisted as a BuildRequires, but not a Requires. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 16 17:03:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 13:03:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188180] Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605161703.k4GH30fX003407@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188180 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-05-16 13:02 EST ------- Just occurred to me looking at other config options... would it be crazy to try something like: ./configure \ -headerdir %{_includedir} \ -datadir %{_datadir} \ -libdir %{_libdir} \ -sysconfdir %{_sysconfdir} \ ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 16 17:20:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 13:20:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191622] Review Request: perl-Expect - Expect for Perl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605161720.k4GHKnbD009424@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Expect - Expect for Perl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191622 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |tibbs at math.uh.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 16 17:23:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 13:23:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191682] add/remove software failed to open. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605161723.k4GHNOIm010519@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: add/remove software failed to open. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191682 ville.skytta at iki.fi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|Package Review |pirut CC|fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 16 17:34:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 13:34:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191088] Review Request: mlsutils In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605161734.k4GHY6B7014212@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mlsutils https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191088 kaboom at oobleck.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |kaboom at oobleck.net OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 16 17:34:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 13:34:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189010] Review Request: pybaz - Python library bindings for the GNU Arch/Bazaar RCS In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605161734.k4GHYQqu014493@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pybaz - Python library bindings for the GNU Arch/Bazaar RCS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189010 ------- Additional Comments From shahms at shahms.com 2006-05-16 13:34 EST ------- I have updated files that add a horrible kludge to cope with the bad repo package until this gets fixed. http://shahms.mesd.k12.or.us/packages/pybaz.spec http://shahms.mesd.k12.or.us/packages/pybaz-1.1-3.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 16 17:36:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 13:36:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191968] Review Request: phpBB - A php Bulletin Board In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605161736.k4GHaqvi015432@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: phpBB - A php Bulletin Board https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191968 ------- Additional Comments From imlinux at gmail.com 2006-05-16 13:36 EST ------- I thought I saw this before. I can't find anything in bugzilla I swear.... Anyway, if it's the general will of Extras to keep this out then I'll close this like the last one. I don't think there's strong enough arguements on either side that says this absolutely should or shouldn't be in extras. My take on it is that if Fedora users want to use it, it would be nice if they used extras where it will always be updated. That's the nice thing about yum and our package management system. They don't have to keep tabs on what phpBB is doing or if a new version has come out in order to have an up to date system. They only have to run "yum update" -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 16 17:43:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 13:43:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191088] Review Request: mlsutils In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605161743.k4GHh6hP017384@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mlsutils https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191088 ------- Additional Comments From kaboom at oobleck.net 2006-05-16 13:42 EST ------- Quick partial review: - bad: rpmlint fails -- see below - bad: package naming seems weird -- why mlsutils, and not dev_allocator? and why version 1.1, and not 0.5? - not sure: spec name may or may not be good, depending on package name - bad: some of the guidelines not met -- for example, Vendor is set - good: license is fine - good: license matches - bad: license not included - good: spec is English - good: spec is legible - good: source matches -- both md5sum 9aea61daf9017e800ca025b50c69ee6b - good: package builds, once BuildRequires added - good: no excludes - bad: BuildRequires missing for at least: libxml2-devel libselinux-devel audit-libs-devel rpmlint: [kaboom at fc5test i386]$ rpmlint mlsutils-1.1-1.i386.rpm W: mlsutils incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.4-2 1.1-1 W: mlsutils conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/devallocation/supported_device_classes.conf W: mlsutils conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/rc.d/init.d/dev_allocation E: mlsutils executable-marked-as-config-file /etc/rc.d/init.d/dev_allocation E: mlsutils setuid-binary /usr/bin/dev_allocator root 04755 E: mlsutils non-standard-executable-perm /usr/bin/dev_allocator 04755 E: mlsutils non-executable-script /usr/share/devallocation/classes/template 0644 E: mlsutils non-executable-script /usr/share/devallocation/classes/cups 0644 E: mlsutils no-status-entry /etc/rc.d/init.d/dev_allocation W: mlsutils no-reload-entry /etc/rc.d/init.d/dev_allocation W: mlsutils service-default-enabled /etc/rc.d/init.d/dev_allocation W: mlsutils incoherent-init-script-name dev_allocation [kaboom at fc5test i386]$ rpmlint mlsutils-devel-1.1-1.i386.rpm W: mlsutils-devel no-dependency-on mlsutils W: mlsutils-devel no-documentation [kaboom at fc5test i386]$ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 16 17:44:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 13:44:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189013] Review Request: python-sqlalchemy - Modular and flexible ORM library for python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605161744.k4GHihgh017754@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-sqlalchemy - Modular and flexible ORM library for python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189013 ------- Additional Comments From shahms at shahms.com 2006-05-16 13:44 EST ------- Thanks for looking at the packages. Considering all of the rpmlint problems were related to the scripts for building the documentation (which is already built in the source tar ball), they are removed and not installed with the actual documentation. I also updated to the newest upstream version (0.1.7). http://shahms.mesd.k12.or.us/packages/python-sqlalchemy.spec http://shahms.mesd.k12.or.us/pacakges/python-sqlalchemy-0.1.7-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 16 17:51:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 13:51:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191603] Review Request: rsnapshot -- rsync-based filesystem snapshots In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605161751.k4GHpEXW019918@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rsnapshot -- rsync-based filesystem snapshots https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191603 ------- Additional Comments From lists at forevermore.net 2006-05-16 13:51 EST ------- I'd be more than happy to just use the package and spec from rpmforge if it's up to snuff. As for the version thing, I know that rsnapshot is currently recovering from a maintainer switch and users are told to use the cvs version instead of posted releases because there are a lot of good changes in cvs that the new maintainer hasn't had enough time to package up yet. I've seen 1.2.3 floating around, but it's nowhere to be found when you go to download it. I'll poke around with the rpmforge package and see if I can glean any info from it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 16 17:56:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 13:56:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188180] Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605161756.k4GHuSQS021613@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188180 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-05-16 13:56 EST ------- Looked at Mandriva's qt4 pkg, they use -docdir %_docdir/%%name-%%version I think I'll go with that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 16 18:03:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 14:03:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190939] Review Request: daap-sharp In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605161803.k4GI3SXr023871@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: daap-sharp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190939 ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at ameritech.net 2006-05-16 14:03 EST ------- Spec URL: http://piedmont.homelinux.org/fedora/tangerine/daap-sharp.spec SRPM URL: http://piedmont.homelinux.org/fedora/tangerine/daap-sharp-0.3.3-3.src.rpm * Tue May 16 2006 Brian Pepple - 0.3.3-3 - Add devel package for *.pc file. - Add Req on mono-core. - Use cleaner URL. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 16 18:13:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 14:13:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 165689] Review Request: SquidGuard: filter, redirector and access controller plugin for squid In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605161813.k4GIDe3Z027243@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: SquidGuard: filter, redirector and access controller plugin for squid https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=165689 ------- Additional Comments From jwb at redhat.com 2006-05-16 14:13 EST ------- I'm looking through orphaned packages, and this package seems to have had all the requested changes from 14-Sep-2005 made to it. I'm willing to take over packaging of squidguard, but would like someone to verify the state of the package before I request a build in plague or update the owners list. The package is still listed as owned by oliver at linux-kernel.at. If requested, I can generate a src.rpm and make it available for review as opposed to a CVS checkout. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 16 18:13:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 14:13:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191622] Review Request: perl-Expect - Expect for Perl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605161813.k4GIDrmx027338@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Expect - Expect for Perl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191622 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-05-16 14:13 EST ------- That description is really suboptimal. How about something like this, partially stolen from the original Expect description: This module provides Expect-like functionality to Perl. Expect is a tool for automating interactive applications such as telnet, ftp, passwd, fsck, rlogin, tip, etc. Review: * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. It's not included separately in the package, but this is not necessary as the upstream tarball does not include it. * source files match upstream: f5f0ea179c6f19d9f08e22c6a0072292 Expect-1.16.tar.gz f5f0ea179c6f19d9f08e22c6a0072292 Expect-1.16.tar.gz-srpm * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane. * no shared libraries are present. * package is not relocatable. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * %clean is present. * %check is present and all tests pass: Passed 36 of 36 tests. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no libtool .la droppings. * not a GUI app. APPROVED, but please fix the description before checking in. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 16 18:14:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 14:14:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191968] Review Request: phpBB - A php Bulletin Board In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605161814.k4GIEZUZ027542@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: phpBB - A php Bulletin Board https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191968 peter at thecodergeek.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |peter at thecodergeek.com ------- Additional Comments From peter at thecodergeek.com 2006-05-16 14:14 EST ------- Mike, I think that the main reason people do not like phpBB is its security track record (well, the lack thereof at least...) However, there is a point in which the packager simply must trust that upstream is doing their job to keep things updated and patched. Generally, the phpBB people are good about quickly putting out security fixes for their software; and I think having multiple maintainers for such a package would make it so that we could keep the software in Extras patched and updated very quickly after such a fix is put out from upstream. In this way, users would not need to worry about their server's security due to this application. If the community wants phpBB to be put into Extras, would having a couple (or more) comaintainers to keep it updated and fixed ease their worries a bit? If this is the case, I would be happy to help Mike (and others?) maintain phpBB in Extras. (I submitted bug #188410.) However, I think it would be best if the code went through at least a brief security audit before being putting in Extras. There is a point where upstream simply needs to be trusted; but with phpBB's upstream, I do not think it wise to have that trust quite so blindly. Would this be feasible? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 16 18:18:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 14:18:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 183912] Review Request: jack-audio-connection-kit - The Jack Audio Connection Kit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605161818.k4GIIJiw028783@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jack-audio-connection-kit - The Jack Audio Connection Kit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183912 ------- Additional Comments From seg at haxxed.com 2006-05-16 14:18 EST ------- Ah, that was it. Also I overlooked the following line. %dir %{_libdir}/jack %{_libdir}/jack/*.so Is that still different then just specifying %{_libdir}/jack/ ? Obviously it would just include .so files, but in this case that's all that seems to be there. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 16 18:23:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 14:23:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188180] Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605161823.k4GINAvH030298@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188180 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-05-16 14:22 EST ------- Anyone have an inclination whether we ought to build/include lib_debug libs too, using ./configure -debug-and-release instead of ./configure -release ? No biggie. Clearly if/when they are included, they'd be in their own subpkg, so it should be easy to add later if there is demand. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 16 18:28:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 14:28:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191239] Review Request: qjackctl - Qt based JACK control application In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605161828.k4GISnq3031909@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qjackctl - Qt based JACK control application https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191239 ------- Additional Comments From seg at haxxed.com 2006-05-16 14:28 EST ------- Seems to me if you're worried about reproducible builds, really you should be using a controlled chroot environment. (mock) Anyway, I just reviewed jack. I'm going to work on Qjackcontrol today. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 16 18:29:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 14:29:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191603] Review Request: rsnapshot -- rsync-based filesystem snapshots In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605161829.k4GITcPG032201@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rsnapshot -- rsync-based filesystem snapshots https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191603 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-05-16 14:29 EST ------- Your Source: URL is fine if you just change the version to 1.2.3; http://rsnapshot.org/downloads/ has all of the released versions. I checked CVS and it looks like they're going to release 1.2.4 soon. Looking at the rpmforge .spec, there's not too much differece once you ignore whitespace and your section separators. Rpmforge spec: Uses macros on the %configure line instead of hardcoding the paths. Has lots of BuildReqires; I'm not sure if they're necessary. Neatly calls logger in %post to make sure that errors get logged somewhere. Patches the default config. Packages the utils directory as %doc (which should annoy rpmlint; extras doesn't generally like executable documentation). Your spec: Does that hack to avoid configure freaking out on an existing config file. Nice. Does Require: openssh instead of openssh-clients; I'm not sure which is correct. I'll attach the rpmforge spec. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 16 18:30:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 14:30:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191603] Review Request: rsnapshot -- rsync-based filesystem snapshots In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605161830.k4GIUW83032483@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rsnapshot -- rsync-based filesystem snapshots https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191603 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-05-16 14:30 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=129254) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=129254&action=view) rpmforge specfile -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 16 18:33:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 14:33:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191968] Review Request: phpBB - A php Bulletin Board In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605161833.k4GIXCE0001259@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: phpBB - A php Bulletin Board https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191968 ------- Additional Comments From imlinux at gmail.com 2006-05-16 14:33 EST ------- Sounds good to me. I'll be the first to admit that phpBB has done a lot of harm on the net, but I don't think that it means we shouldn't package it. Lots of people use it (including myself). Is there a way to have multiple maintainers get notified when a bug gets submitted? As long as the contributors in question make sure to assign the bug to themselves when they start working on it I don't think people would step on eachothers toes much. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 16 18:35:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 14:35:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188180] Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605161835.k4GIZ1PB001805@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188180 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-05-16 14:34 EST ------- (most bits from -18 borrowed from looking at Mandriva's qt4 rpm) Spec Name or Url: http://kde-redhat.unl.edu/apt/kde-redhat/SPECS/qt4-4.1.2-18.spec SRPM Name or Url: http://kde-redhat.unl.edu/apt/kde-redhat/all/SRPMS.stable/qt4-4.1.2-18.src.rpm %changelog * Tue May 16 2006 Rex Dieter 4.1.2-18 - %%_bindir symlinks: qtconfig4 -> qt4config, qtdemo4 -> qt4demo - -libdir %%qtdir/%%_lib, simplifies %%_lib != lib case - -docdir %%_docdir/%%name-%%version - build shared versions of libQtAssistantClient,libQtUiTools too - strip extraneous -L paths, libs from *.prl files too * Tue May 16 2006 Rex Dieter 4.1.2-17 - .desktop: Qt -> Qt4, and Comment= (where missing) - -devel: include -designer here, Obsoletes/Provides: %%name-designer. It's small, simplifies things... one less subpkg to worry about. - -doc: include %%qtdir/doc symlink here - -docdir %%_docdir/%%name-doc-%%version -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 16 18:36:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 14:36:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191968] Review Request: phpBB - A php Bulletin Board In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605161836.k4GIarY6002676@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: phpBB - A php Bulletin Board https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191968 ------- Additional Comments From peter at thecodergeek.com 2006-05-16 14:36 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > Is there a way to have multiple maintainers get notified when a bug gets > submitted? As long as the contributors in question make sure to assign the bug > to themselves when they start working on it I don't think people would step on > eachothers toes much. I don't know for certain, but would adding both of our email address in the owners.list with a comma separating the two (if we import this) be adequate? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 16 18:41:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 14:41:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191622] Review Request: perl-Expect - Expect for Perl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605161841.k4GIfnEb004352@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Expect - Expect for Perl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191622 ------- Additional Comments From jpo at di.uminho.pt 2006-05-16 14:41 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > That description is really suboptimal. How about something like this, partially > stolen from the original Expect description: > > This module provides Expect-like functionality to Perl. Expect is a tool for > automating interactive applications such as telnet, ftp, passwd, fsck, rlogin, > tip, etc. Done. Importing the new SRPM (updated specfile in same location) http://gsd.di.uminho.pt/jpo/software/fedora/perl-Expect-1.16-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 16 18:42:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 14:42:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191968] Review Request: phpBB - A php Bulletin Board In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605161842.k4GIgOYI004594@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: phpBB - A php Bulletin Board https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191968 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-05-16 14:42 EST ------- Damn mid-air collisions..... I don't really understand why Peter gave up on the original review request; phpBB is commonly used and I fully agree with Mike that having automated updates coming from a trusted source should be far better for overall security than requiring every single admin to watch for updates and manually apply them. I do think that this should be blocked until the current minor issues open on 2.0.20 are closed. (There's a full path disclosure and I think one other issue that I can't recall at the moment.) My real concern is for the feasibility of doing automated upgrades. I look after a small phpBB setup and while the procedure for me is simple because I don't run any mods, it's never as simple as just replacing the files. How is that going to be handled by the package? If we're going to put this into extras, we can't be afraid to push updates quickly and admins need to trust that those updates will work (else they'll just not update the package at all). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 16 18:49:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 14:49:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191998] New: Review Request: scrip -- spherical coordinate interpolation and remapping package Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191998 Summary: Review Request: scrip -- spherical coordinate interpolation and remapping package Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: ed at eh3.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://mitgcm.org/eh3/fedora_misc/scrip.spec SRPM URL: http://mitgcm.org/eh3/fedora_misc/scrip-1.4-3.src.rpm Description: scrip -- spherical coordinate interpolation and remapping package This package installs a single binary ("scrip") and a pdf-formatted user's manual. The scrip program calculates remapping weights for gridded data sets on the surface of a sphere. It reads netCDF files that contain the grid information and writes netcdf files that contain the remapping weights. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 16 18:56:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 14:56:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 185370] Review Request: gtklp - A GTK frontend to CUPS In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605161856.k4GIurDC008976@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtklp - A GTK frontend to CUPS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=185370 gemi at bluewin.ch changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From gemi at bluewin.ch 2006-05-16 14:56 EST ------- Built on FC-4, FC-5 and FC-6. Added entry to owners.list. Thanks for the review! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 16 19:00:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 15:00:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191968] Review Request: phpBB - A php Bulletin Board In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605161900.k4GJ0pSM010346@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: phpBB - A php Bulletin Board https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191968 ------- Additional Comments From imlinux at gmail.com 2006-05-16 15:00 EST ------- This may be a bit drastic but if there's a severe vulnerability out, could we have our update disable phpBB with a "Make sure to read the docs for this upgrade" type message. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 16 19:03:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 15:03:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188180] Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605161903.k4GJ3h0s011159@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188180 ------- Additional Comments From laurent.rineau__fc_extra at normalesup.org 2006-05-16 15:03 EST ------- (In reply to comment #80) > Just occurred to me looking at other config options... would it be crazy to try > something like: > ./configure \ > -headerdir %{_includedir} \ > -datadir %{_datadir} \ > -libdir %{_libdir} \ > -sysconfdir %{_sysconfdir} \ > ? It's the policy of Debian, AFAIK. It seems to be possible, and quite easy. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 16 19:04:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 15:04:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 165689] Review Request: SquidGuard: filter, redirector and access controller plugin for squid In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605161904.k4GJ47qK011297@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: SquidGuard: filter, redirector and access controller plugin for squid https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=165689 ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2006-05-16 15:03 EST ------- jwb, all required changes were not yet merged. The Fedora squidguard RPM must maintain upgrade and functionality compatibility with the K12LTSP version. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 16 19:08:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 15:08:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188180] Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605161908.k4GJ8E5x012611@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188180 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-05-16 15:08 EST ------- Re: comment #84. Great. The only drawback is that doing so makes parallel installs impossible (or at least a lot harder). No biggie. I'll play around with that to consider later... let's see if we can get this approved in < 100 comments. (: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 16 19:09:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 15:09:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191968] Review Request: phpBB - A php Bulletin Board In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605161909.k4GJ9uvN013106@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: phpBB - A php Bulletin Board https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191968 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-05-16 15:09 EST ------- I don't think that's wise; I can't think of any other instance of a package doing that. One additional thought is that we can get the big heads together and figure out the proper selinux policies to contain the impact of potential vulnerabilities. (Or is that even reasonable? I'm no selinux expert, but I try not to turn it off at the first sign of trouble.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 16 19:13:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 15:13:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188180] Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605161913.k4GJDel6014051@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188180 ------- Additional Comments From laurent.rineau__fc_extra at normalesup.org 2006-05-16 15:13 EST ------- (In reply to comment #83) > - build shared versions of libQtAssistantClient,libQtUiTools too Real bad. As I said in comment #43, the Qt developers will not preserve the binary compatibility. The soname is incorrect, with theses two patches. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 16 19:21:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 15:21:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188180] Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605161921.k4GJL1WA016031@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188180 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-05-16 15:20 EST ------- In comment #43, you sounded unsure and seemed to be speculating about binary compatibility. Well, even if it's remotely possible, I guess we'll have to stick with upstream and their use of these 2 static libs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 16 19:30:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 15:30:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188180] Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605161930.k4GJUtdg018971@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188180 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-05-16 15:30 EST ------- Spec Name or Url: http://kde-redhat.unl.edu/apt/kde-redhat/SPECS/qt4-4.1.2-19.spec SRPM Name or Url: http://kde-redhat.unl.edu/apt/kde-redhat/all/SRPMS.stable/qt4-4.1.2-19.src.rpm %changelog * Tue May 16 2006 Rex Dieter 4.1.2-19 - drop libQtAssistantClient,libQtUiTools shlib patches -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 16 19:34:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 15:34:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191603] Review Request: rsnapshot -- rsync-based filesystem snapshots In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605161934.k4GJYOCN020265@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rsnapshot -- rsync-based filesystem snapshots https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191603 ------- Additional Comments From lists at forevermore.net 2006-05-16 15:34 EST ------- I'll take a look at this when I get home from work. The require is probably openssh-clients, I didn't know it was a separate package. fyi, "my" spec is just a reworking of the upstream spec, so I can't claim responsibility for the cool configure script. Looks like Dag's spec has the same stuff. I also just noticed that the last changelog date was completely wrong.. I typed "may 21" instead of "may 13" (which is doubly bad since I probably meant to type 12) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 16 19:37:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 15:37:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188180] Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605161937.k4GJbxAq021409@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188180 ------- Additional Comments From laurent.rineau__fc_extra at normalesup.org 2006-05-16 15:37 EST ------- (In reply to comment #87) > In comment #43, you sounded unsure and seemed to be speculating about binary > compatibility. Well, even if it's remotely possible, I guess we'll have to > stick with upstream and their use of these 2 static libs. I have checked. As far as I understand the makefiles, the soname will be libQtFoobar.so.4 for each library, even for the two that should have more restrictive soname. I cannot assure you that the binary compatibility will be break, but it could, as Qt developers have chosen to make them static. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 16 19:42:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 15:42:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191968] Review Request: phpBB - A php Bulletin Board In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605161942.k4GJgLhm022714@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: phpBB - A php Bulletin Board https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191968 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2006-05-16 15:42 EST ------- I don't think adding multiple initial owners in owners.list works, but one can be added there and the rest to initialcclist. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 16 19:49:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 15:49:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189375] Re-Review Request: Maelstrom: space combat game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605161949.k4GJnIt8025223@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Re-Review Request: Maelstrom: space combat game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189375 ------- Additional Comments From notting at redhat.com 2006-05-16 15:49 EST ------- %{__id_u} -n? Cute. I wonder why anyone would ever want to macro override id. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 16 19:58:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 15:58:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191671] Review Request: serpentine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605161958.k4GJwkAi028532@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: serpentine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191671 gemi at bluewin.ch changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |gemi at bluewin.ch ------- Additional Comments From gemi at bluewin.ch 2006-05-16 15:58 EST ------- A few preliminary comments: * These directories should be owned, otherwise they hang around after uninstalling: /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/serpentine /usr/share/serpentine * The russian entry in the .desktop file doesn't seem to be UTF-8... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 16 20:07:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 16:07:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188180] Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605162007.k4GK7Wdq030911@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188180 ------- Additional Comments From laurent.rineau__fc_extra at normalesup.org 2006-05-16 16:07 EST ------- Needed patch to compile release -19: @@ -276,9 +276,8 @@ *) LINK=${i}4 ;; - - ln -s ../%{_lib}/%{qt_dirname}/bin/$i %{buildroot}%{_bindir}/${LINK} esac + ln -s ../%{_lib}/%{qt_dirname}/bin/$i %{buildroot}%{_bindir}/${LINK} done popd (diff is stupid: it is the "esac" that needs to move.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 16 20:15:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 16:15:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 165689] Review Request: SquidGuard: filter, redirector and access controller plugin for squid In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605162015.k4GKFESl032704@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: SquidGuard: filter, redirector and access controller plugin for squid https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=165689 ------- Additional Comments From jwb at redhat.com 2006-05-16 16:15 EST ------- I've gone back through the list of changes mentioned on 14-Sep, and can find nothing that hasn't been merged. I'm probably not seeing something, but I'll need someone else to point it out to me. Can one of the K12LTSP people review the srpm at http://www.berningeronline.net/squidGuard-1.2.0-12.src.rpm and let me know what hasn't been merged yet? SPEC: http://www.berningeronline.net/squidGuard.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 16 20:15:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 16:15:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191623] Review Request: perl-Expect-Simple - Wrapper around the Expect module In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605162015.k4GKFwIU000559@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Expect-Simple - Wrapper around the Expect module https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191623 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |tibbs at math.uh.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 16 20:37:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 16:37:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191200] Review Request: lvm2-cluster In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605162037.k4GKbn2L007445@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lvm2-cluster https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191200 ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-05-16 16:37 EST ------- Initial question to think about while I review it is would this package be better suited for Extras? What reasoning is there for including it in core? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 16 20:49:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 16:49:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 165689] Review Request: SquidGuard: filter, redirector and access controller plugin for squid In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605162049.k4GKnxZh011549@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: SquidGuard: filter, redirector and access controller plugin for squid https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=165689 ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2006-05-16 16:49 EST ------- Oh, I didn't see an updated .src.rpm posted after that. Let's get existing K12LTSP users to test your RPM before we push it to Extras. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 16 21:11:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 17:11:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191968] Review Request: phpBB - A php Bulletin Board In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605162111.k4GLB3U7018610@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: phpBB - A php Bulletin Board https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191968 ------- Additional Comments From peter at thecodergeek.com 2006-05-16 17:10 EST ------- Jason: I "gave up" originally because it seemed that it would be better to wait until we could have multiple maintainers for it (at least) so that any security issues could be fixed quickly. With respect to modifications made by the user, I think that it therefore becomes his or her perogative to keep the phpBB install updated. I see this issue as similar to that of other packages: the user is free to modify it from its original packaging, but only that packaging is supported from the people who maintain it (be it one or more of Red Hat's engineers or others who maintain Extras stuff). If there is an update script or similar that needs to be run, could we potentially automate this enough to put it into the %post section ok? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 16 21:15:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 17:15:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 165689] Review Request: SquidGuard: filter, redirector and access controller plugin for squid In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605162115.k4GLF1DI020022@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: SquidGuard: filter, redirector and access controller plugin for squid https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=165689 ------- Additional Comments From jwb at redhat.com 2006-05-16 17:14 EST ------- There wasn't an actual updated .src.rpm posted; this was the .src.rpm I build from a 'cvs co squidguard; cd squidguard/devel; make srpm'. So I think things were merged, just nothing was ever tested / acked / built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 16 21:16:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 17:16:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191968] Review Request: phpBB - A php Bulletin Board In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605162116.k4GLG1kx020402@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: phpBB - A php Bulletin Board https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191968 ------- Additional Comments From peter at thecodergeek.com 2006-05-16 17:15 EST ------- (In reply to comment #10) > I don't think adding multiple initial owners in owners.list works, but one can > be added there and the rest to initialcclist. We'll have to do that then if it's imported. Thanks, Ville. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 16 21:16:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 17:16:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191200] Review Request: lvm2-cluster In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605162116.k4GLG7AF020426@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lvm2-cluster https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191200 ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-05-16 17:15 EST ------- Bad: - Buildroot should be %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) - Prereq should not be used. Use Requires(pre): instead. - Init file is not a %config file. Don't mark it as such. Indifferent: - Mixuse of %{_foo} style variable and $FOO variable. One should be used. Questions: - Why exclusive arch? Please list in spec file. - Why define _exec_prefix? _exec_prefix is an alias of _prefix, which is /usr. - --with-user= --with-group= Does that even work, non defined users? Also, I can't actually build this package because the deps aren't available in rawhide. Error: Missing Dependency: /lib/modules/2.6.16-1.2096_FC5 is needed by package dlm-kernel Error: Missing Dependency: kernel = 2.6.16-1.2096_FC5 is needed by package dlm-kernel Error: Missing Dependency: /lib/modules/2.6.16-1.2096_FC5 is needed by package cman-kernel Error: Missing Dependency: kernel = 2.6.16-1.2096_FC5 is needed by package cman-kernel -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 16 21:49:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 17:49:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191200] Review Request: lvm2-cluster In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605162149.k4GLn8ZH030972@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lvm2-cluster https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191200 ------- Additional Comments From agk at redhat.com 2006-05-16 17:48 EST ------- Core vs extras: Before too long, some people will need this package in their initrd to boot their system (with their root filesystem on a clustered logical volume with a clustered filesystem) and the installer will need to support this in some fashion... (These people will also want the package on any rescue CD.) This package is a member of the set of clustering packages, and the decision was taken to put the rest of them in core not extras (not least because some people will already be trying to have system filesystems using them). Most people using gfs need to use the lvm2-cluster package *before* the gfs package, hence the complaints I'm getting from people about it missing from fc5. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 16 21:52:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 17:52:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191070] Review Request: mcstrans In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605162152.k4GLqTQQ032522@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mcstrans https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191070 jkeating at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-05-16 17:52 EST ------- Package was released to rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 16 21:53:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 17:53:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190000] Review Request: partimage In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605162153.k4GLrpbm000411@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: partimage https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190000 ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-05-16 17:53 EST ------- Where are we with this, I heard we may not be including due to NTFS? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 16 22:22:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 18:22:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177827] Review Request: python-ctypes - Advanced Foreign Function Interface for Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605162222.k4GMMIi5007136@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-ctypes - Advanced Foreign Function Interface for Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177827 pnasrat at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 16 22:22:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 18:22:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191671] Review Request: serpentine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605162222.k4GMMeRR007244@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: serpentine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191671 ------- Additional Comments From foolish at guezz.net 2006-05-16 18:22 EST ------- How can I deal with the russian entry issue? The ru.po file claims to be utf-8. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 16 22:24:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 18:24:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191200] Review Request: lvm2-cluster In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605162224.k4GMOGbL007644@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lvm2-cluster https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191200 ------- Additional Comments From agk at redhat.com 2006-05-16 18:23 EST ------- The dependencies for fc6 will be sorted out over the next few days in parallel with this (should work with fc5) - we want this package to be ready in fc6 at the same time. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 16 22:58:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 18:58:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191623] Review Request: perl-Expect-Simple - Wrapper around the Expect module In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605162258.k4GMwHu6015254@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Expect-Simple - Wrapper around the Expect module https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191623 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-05-16 18:58 EST ------- There's not much to this one. * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible; license text is included in the package. * source files match upstream: 23c72fa4461f07522eb8c8511bad5d43 Expect-Simple-0.02.tar.gz 23c72fa4461f07522eb8c8511bad5d43 Expect-Simple-0.02.tar.gz-srpm * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64) with perl-Expect added. * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane. * no shared libraries are present. * package is not relocatable. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * %clean is present. * %check is present and the single test passes: 1..1 ok 1 * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no libtool .la droppings. * not a GUI app. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 16 23:00:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 19:00:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191624] Review Request: perl-Test-Expect - Automated driving and testing of terminal-based programs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605162300.k4GN0p0s015520@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-Expect - Automated driving and testing of terminal-based programs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191624 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |tibbs at math.uh.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 16 23:22:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 19:22:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191671] Review Request: serpentine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605162322.k4GNM4Om019328@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: serpentine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191671 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-05-16 19:21 EST ------- I'm pretty sure it's not UTF-8. I ran through a bunch of encodings and didn't see one that would produce meaningful output when viewed on a Unicode-capable terminal. I would ask upstream. If you have no luck there, you could always remove the Russian translation and work to get it in later. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 16 23:29:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 19:29:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 185262] Review Request: kchmviewer - CHM viewer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605162329.k4GNTLED020751@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kchmviewer - CHM viewer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=185262 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-05-16 19:29 EST ------- I was on vacations, I hope everything is sorted out now. The issue raised in the comment #6 should be fixed, I updated owners.list, and it is built for FC-4 FC-5. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 16 23:29:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 19:29:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191671] Review Request: serpentine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605162329.k4GNTuv1020918@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: serpentine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191671 ------- Additional Comments From gemi at bluewin.ch 2006-05-16 19:29 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > How can I deal with the russian entry issue? The ru.po file claims to be utf-8. I now tested it running with "LANG=ru_RU serpentine": It is certainly not utf-8. Only the standard menus have correct cyrillic letters. This is however not a blocker, since it is not your job as a packager to ensure that translations are correct. You should simply notify upstream about it. Another point from http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Python: The python-abi req is not needed on FC-4 upwards anymore. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 17 00:05:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 20:05:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191624] Review Request: perl-Test-Expect - Automated driving and testing of terminal-based programs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605170005.k4H05Gs2028201@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-Expect - Automated driving and testing of terminal-based programs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191624 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-05-16 20:05 EST ------- Module::Build is still having trouble in development; I'll review this on FC5. (We really should try to help Steve with that.) * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. It's not included separately in the package, but this is not necessary as the upstream tarball does not include it. * source files match upstream: b22cb4575d910bb2d36e506a958da300 Test-Expect-0.30.tar.gz b22cb4575d910bb2d36e506a958da300 Test-Expect-0.30.tar.gz-srpm * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * package builds in mock (FC5, x86_64), with perl-Expect and perl-Expect-Simple added. * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane. * no shared libraries are present. * package is not relocatable. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * %clean is present. * %check is present and all tests pass: All tests successful. Files=1, Tests=18, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.08 cusr + 0.04 csys = 0.12 CPU) * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no libtool .la droppings. * not a GUI app. APPROVED, but note that you won't be able to build on the development branch until the Module::Build problem gets worked out. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 17 00:15:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 20:15:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191303] Review Request: crossfire - 2D multiplayer rpg game server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605170015.k4H0F8EU029855@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: crossfire - 2D multiplayer rpg game server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191303 ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2006-05-16 20:14 EST ------- Updated package the python plugin crash on FC-5. The game server closes and reopens the stdio streams when run with '-detach', which causes all sorts of confusion in the plugin. I think I've fixed the confusion. A patch and a bug report have been sent upstream: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1489893&group_id=13833&atid=313833 https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1489902&group_id=13833&atid=113833 http://www.kobold.org/~wart/fedora/crossfire-1.9.0-3.src.rpm http://www.kobold.org/~wart/fedora/crossfire.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 17 00:19:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 20:19:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192043] New: Review Request: ucblogo - An interpreter for the Logo programming language Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192043 Summary: Review Request: ucblogo - An interpreter for the Logo programming language Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: gemi at bluewin.ch QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://math.ifi.unizh.ch/fedora/spec/ucblogo.spec SRPM URL: http://math.ifi.unizh.ch/fedora/5/i386/SRPMS.gemi/ucblogo-5.5-2.fc5.src.rpm Description: Berkeley Logo (ucblogo) is an interpreter for the Logo programming language. Logo is a computer programming language designed for use by learners, including children. This dialect of Logo features random-access arrays, variable number of inputs to user-defined procedures, various error handling improvements, comments and continuation lines, first-class instruction and expression templates, and macros. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 17 00:32:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 20:32:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191303] Review Request: crossfire - 2D multiplayer rpg game server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605170032.k4H0WZpP000819@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: crossfire - 2D multiplayer rpg game server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191303 ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2006-05-16 20:32 EST ------- * rpmlint output E: crossfire non-standard-uid /var/games/crossfire/temp.maps crossfire E: crossfire zero-length /var/games/crossfire/temp.maps E: crossfire non-standard-uid /var/games/crossfire/clockdata crossfire E: crossfire zero-length /var/games/crossfire/clockdata E: crossfire non-standard-uid /var/games/crossfire/template-maps crossfire E: crossfire non-standard-uid /var/games/crossfire/banish_file crossfire E: crossfire zero-length /var/games/crossfire/banish_file E: crossfire non-standard-uid /var/games/crossfire crossfire E: crossfire non-standard-uid /var/games/crossfire/players crossfire E: crossfire non-standard-uid /var/games/crossfire/maps crossfire E: crossfire non-standard-uid /var/games/crossfire/highscore crossfire E: crossfire zero-length /var/games/crossfire/highscore E: crossfire non-standard-uid /var/games/crossfire/unique-items crossfire E: crossfire non-standard-uid /var/games/crossfire/bookarch crossfire E: crossfire zero-length /var/games/crossfire/bookarch E: crossfire non-standard-uid /var/games/crossfire/datafiles crossfire E: crossfire non-standard-uid /var/log/crossfire crossfire W: crossfire incoherent-subsys /etc/rc.d/init.d/crossfire $prog W: crossfire-client-images no-documentation W: crossfire-plugins no-documentation non-standard-uid and zero-length files okay incoherent-subsys looks like a false positive no-documentation warnings okay * Package meets Package Naming Guidelines * Spec file matches base package %{name} * Package meets Packaging Guidelines * Package licensed with open source compatible license * License field matches actual license * License text file included in %doc * Spec file written in American English * Spec file legible * Sources match upstream 43240af83a4414d2dcc19fff3af31a63 crossfire-1.9.0.tar.gz 43240af83a4414d2dcc19fff3af31a63 crossfire-1.9.0.tar.gz 7685cc806a02a3f14336095de6066128 crossfire-1.9.0.arch.tar.gz 7685cc806a02a3f14336095de6066128 crossfire-1.9.0.arch.tar.gz * Package successfully builds on FC5 x86_64 * All build dependencies listed in BuildRequires * Package does not contain locales * Package does not contain shared library files * Package is not relocatable O Package does not own all directories it creates - Package does not own /etc/crossfire directory * Package does not contain any duplicates in %files section * Files have sane attributes (crossfire user created with fedora-usermgnt and sh ared scoreboard files belong to crossfire user as per games SIG guidelines) * Package contains proper %clean section * Macro usage consistant * Package contains permissible content O Crossfire documentation is 4 megs (might want to consider making a seperate -d oc package) * Files in %doc do not affect runtime * Package does not contain headers, library files or .pc files * Package does not contain any .so files * -devel and -plugins package requires base package O -client-images package should require crossfire-client, if that makes sense? * Package does not contain any .la files * Package does not need a .desktop file * Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 17 01:37:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 21:37:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192049] New: Review Request: gnash - GNU Flash player Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192049 Summary: Review Request: gnash - GNU Flash player Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: petersen at redhat.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/petersen/extras/gnash.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/petersen/extras/gnash-0.7.1-1.src.rpm Description: Gnash is a GNU Flash movie player. Till now it has only been possible to play flash movies with proprietary software. While there are a few other free flash players, none supports anything higher than SWF v4 at best. Gnash is based on GameSWF, and supports many SWF v7 features. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 17 01:38:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 21:38:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192049] Review Request: gnash - GNU Flash player In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605170138.k4H1ca0b016646@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnash - GNU Flash player https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192049 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- URL| |http://www.gnu.org/software/ | |gnash/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 17 01:55:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 21:55:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191303] Review Request: crossfire - 2D multiplayer rpg game server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605170155.k4H1tNM8019873@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: crossfire - 2D multiplayer rpg game server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191303 ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2006-05-16 21:55 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > O Package does not own all directories it creates > - Package does not own /etc/crossfire directory Fixed > O Crossfire documentation is 4 megs (might want to consider making a seperate -d > oc package) Done. Note that the -doc subpackage doesn't require the base package as it also contains docs that are relevant to the crossfire-client package. > O -client-images package should require crossfire-client, if that makes sense? Yep, it does. I had forgotten that one. New package with all of these issues addressed: http://www.kobold.org/~wart/fedora/crossfire-1.9.0-4.src.rpm http://www.kobold.org/~wart/fedora/crossfire.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 17 02:04:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 22:04:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192049] Review Request: gnash - GNU Flash player In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605170204.k4H247Hj021368@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnash - GNU Flash player https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192049 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |pertusus at free.fr OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-05-16 22:03 EST ------- * klash is now gnash-klash for the subpackages upstream, this name should be used here also for consistency with what will appear. * there is a security issue that should be patched in fedora extras package, indeed there is an insecure use of /tmp. If it is too much work, at least there should be a note somewhere. * the documentation should be distributed (see the specfile in the tarball for hints on how to do this), except if there is a good reason not to distribute it? At least manpage and html manual, info files and scrollkeeper files would be bonus -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 17 02:14:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 22:14:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192049] Review Request: gnash - GNU Flash player In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605170214.k4H2E7cM023351@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnash - GNU Flash player https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192049 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-05-16 22:13 EST ------- * rpmlint gives those warnings: W: gnash devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/libgnashasobjs.so W: gnash devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/libgnashbackend.so W: gnash devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/libgnashgeo.so W: gnash devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/libgnashserver.so W: gnash devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/libgnashbase.so Maybe it isn't necessary to have a distinct gnash-devel package, but in that case it may be good to Provides: %{name}-devel = %{version}-%{release} There is also this warning that may be problematic, although I don't know how to solve it: E: klash binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/lib/kde3/libklashpart.so ['/usr/lib', '/usr/lib/qt-3.3/lib'] Other rpmlint warnings/errors are not problematic. * Maybe the gnash package should be in Group: Applications/Multimedia and not in Applications/Internet (the plugins are rightly in Applications/Internet). * also you could have a look at the descriptions and summary in the spec file in the tarball and pick ideas, although it is up to you, the one you proposed are good. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 17 02:53:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 22:53:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191303] Review Request: crossfire - 2D multiplayer rpg game server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605170253.k4H2re1J032551@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: crossfire - 2D multiplayer rpg game server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191303 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2006-05-16 22:53 EST ------- *** APPROVED *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 17 02:59:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 22:59:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188180] Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605170259.k4H2xvBC001323@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188180 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-05-16 22:59 EST ------- (using the spec/src.rpm from comment #88 and the patch in comment #90) Hopping into the wayback machine for comment #47: :) >> 3. What does this comment refer to? >> # Not sure how to use, where to put this, yet -- Rex >The item right below it: >Source1: qt.conf >The qt documentation mentions the use of qt.conf to set qt options, and I'd like >to be able to set some global ones, but it wasn't clear to me where to put it. >From looking around, it looks like this is a file that an application can use to override the default paths that qt uses to look for things. So, I think it's safe for this package to not ship one. >From comment #56: >(Maybe future versions of rpm will allow to uninstall %doc files, and %lang files.) The future is here now. ;) rpm --excludedocs >From comment #58: >We're starting to find quite a few interesting interdependancies between -devel >and -doc. qtdemo was one (it depended on the demos/examples from -doc, so I >was moving it to -doc), then I found assistant (in -devel) tries to auto-load >qt documentation on startup (and fails, obviously, if -doc/-docs isn't >installed). I'm beginning to doubt the wisdom of even doing a -doc subpkg... >who knows how many more interdendancies may exist. At the moment, I'm leaning >toward dropping the notion of a -doc subpkg, and move it all (back) to -devel >(mostly for sake of simplicity). > >Comments/opinions? What about just putting the doc/html area in doc, and both demos and examples back in devel. That would move off a large amount of docs and would get rid of all these wacky requirements. The doc subpackage would just have html stuff in it. assistant and qtdemo could move back to devel. This is much more what a doc package should be. Examples and demos should be things you need devel for to use anyhow, IMHO. Thoughts? >From comment #58: > Great. The only drawback is that doing so makes parallel installs impossible > (or at least a lot harder). No biggie. I'll play around with that to consider > later... let's see if we can get this approved in < 100 comments. (: Thats too bad. Having it parallel installable would be nice. :( Not a blocker though I guess. Looking at the -19 spec I don't see you using -headerdir, -datadir, and -sysconfdir, just -libdir. So does that mean it's still easily parallel installable? New items: 1. On the desktop-install, shouldn't the vendor be: 'fedora'? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#desktop 2. It still doesn't build for me even with the patch from comment #90. I get: RPM build errors: File not found by glob: /var/tmp/qt4-4.1.2-19.fc6-root-mockbuild/usr/bin/qt*config* File not found: /var/tmp/qt4-4.1.2-19.fc6-root-mockbuild/usr/bin/qt3to4 File not found by glob: /var/tmp/qt4-4.1.2-19.fc6-root-mockbuild/usr/bin/rcc* File not found: /var/tmp/qt4-4.1.2-19.fc6-root-mockbuild/usr/share/doc/qt4-4.1.2/html File not found by glob: /var/tmp/qt4-4.1.2-19.fc6-root-mockbuild/usr/bin/qt*demo* -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 17 03:54:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 23:54:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191303] Review Request: crossfire - 2D multiplayer rpg game server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605170354.k4H3sXbC012619@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: crossfire - 2D multiplayer rpg game server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191303 wart at kobold.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2006-05-16 23:54 EST ------- Imported and built. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 17 04:11:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 00:11:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191304] Review Request: crossfire-client - Client programs for the crossfire game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605170411.k4H4BYTE015381@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: crossfire-client - Client programs for the crossfire game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191304 ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2006-05-17 00:11 EST ------- Imported and built. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 17 04:11:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 00:11:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191553] Review Request: crossfire-maps - map files for the crossfire game server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605170411.k4H4Bsip015417@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: crossfire-maps - map files for the crossfire game server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191553 ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2006-05-17 00:11 EST ------- Imported and built. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 17 04:39:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 00:39:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 183953] Review Request: bit (A bit-oriented data stream parser and gtkmm widget set) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605170439.k4H4dchT020792@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bit (A bit-oriented data stream parser and gtkmm widget set) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183953 ------- Additional Comments From rvinyard at cs.nmsu.edu 2006-05-17 00:39 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=129297) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=129297&action=view) bit unit test results -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 17 04:41:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 00:41:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 183953] Review Request: bit (A bit-oriented data stream parser and gtkmm widget set) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605170441.k4H4fPJx021171@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bit (A bit-oriented data stream parser and gtkmm widget set) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183953 ------- Additional Comments From rvinyard at cs.nmsu.edu 2006-05-17 00:41 EST ------- Spec Name or Url: http://miskatonic.cs.nmsu.edu/pub/bit.spec SRPM Name or Url: http://miskatonic.cs.nmsu.edu/pub/fedora/5/srpms/bit-0.2.0-1.src.rpm Many changes and new releases since the last update. - Orphaned directory - Fixed in 0.2.0, data_DIST was missing in Makefile.am that had the .dtd and .xml files that get installed - Missing Requires: - Added pkgconfig and boost-devel - Added cppunit - Removed gtkmm24-devel (gtkmm widgets are now in bitgtkmm) - Duplicate AUTHORS and COPYING are fixed - Download location changed to http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/libbit/%(name)-%(version).tar.bz2 - I kept getting timeouts with download.sourceforge.net, but prdownloads works. - Extra qualification is fixed in 0.2.0 release. - Unit tests migrated to cppunit and extended in 0.2.0. (they're good now; see attachment) - Reference doc handling has been changed to reflect the way it was handled in cairomm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 17 04:49:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 00:49:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192052] New: Review Request: bitgtkmm (Gtkmm widgets for the bit library) Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192052 Summary: Review Request: bitgtkmm (Gtkmm widgets for the bit library) Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: rvinyard at cs.nmsu.edu QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://miskatonic.cs.nmsu.edu/pub/bitgtkmm.spec SRPM URL: http://miskatonic.cs.nmsu.edu/pub/fedora/5/srpms/bitgtkmm-0.2.1-1.src.rpm Description: The bitgtkmm library contains gtkmm widgets to display and manipulate the buffers, records, fields and elements of the bit library, as well as displaying data streams parsed by bit library specifications. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 17 05:19:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 01:19:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191553] Review Request: crossfire-maps - map files for the crossfire game server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605170519.k4H5JSbY027683@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: crossfire-maps - map files for the crossfire game server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191553 wart at kobold.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 17 05:19:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 01:19:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191304] Review Request: crossfire-client - Client programs for the crossfire game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605170519.k4H5JLBj027639@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: crossfire-client - Client programs for the crossfire game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191304 wart at kobold.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 17 06:17:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 02:17:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192052] Review Request: bitgtkmm (Gtkmm widgets for the bit library) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605170617.k4H6HiiE006600@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bitgtkmm (Gtkmm widgets for the bit library) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192052 rc040203 at freenet.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |183953 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 17 06:18:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 02:18:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 183953] Review Request: bit (A bit-oriented data stream parser and gtkmm widget set) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605170618.k4H6I58l006681@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bit (A bit-oriented data stream parser and gtkmm widget set) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183953 rc040203 at freenet.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |192052 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 17 07:36:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 03:36:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191239] Review Request: qjackctl - Qt based JACK control application In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605170736.k4H7ap1G022692@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qjackctl - Qt based JACK control application https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191239 ------- Additional Comments From seg at haxxed.com 2006-05-17 03:36 EST ------- MUST items: - rpmlint: Clean - Package name: Ok - Spec name: Ok - Meets packaging guidelines: NEEDSWORK - License: Ok - Spec in American English: Ok - Spec legible: Ok - Sources match upstream: Ok - Builds: Ok - BuildRequires: Ok - Locales: Ok - ldconfig: Ok - Relocation: Ok - Directory ownership: Ok - %files: Ok - %clean: Ok - Macros: Ok - Code vs. Content: Ok - Documentation: Ok - devel package: Ok - .desktop file: Ok SHOULD: - Includes license text: Ok - Mock build: Ok - Builds on all archs: Built on i386, x86_64 - Package functional: Tested on i386, x86_64 - Scriptlets: Ok - Subpackages: Ok NEEDSWORK: Source: seems to need to be http://dl.sf.net/sourceforge/qjackctl/[...] otherwise I get a 404 as is. The Requires: jack-audio-connection-kit >= 0.80.0 is unnecessary as no such old version is going to be in Extras. The generic INSTALL instructions should not be packaged. The desktop file should be included as Source:, not embedded in the spec, as shown in the Desktop Files section of the packaging guidelines. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 17 08:14:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 04:14:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190101] Review Request: php-pear-Log In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605170814.k4H8EkH7031988@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Log https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190101 Bug 190101 depends on bug 190252, which changed state. Bug 190252 Summary: /usr/lib/php/pear used for "noarch" pear RPM. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190252 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |ERRATA Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 17 08:14:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 04:14:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190156] Review Request: php-pear-HTTP In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605170814.k4H8Ehnq031965@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-HTTP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190156 Bug 190156 depends on bug 190252, which changed state. Bug 190252 Summary: /usr/lib/php/pear used for "noarch" pear RPM. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190252 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |MODIFIED Resolution| |ERRATA Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 17 08:15:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 04:15:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190066] Review Request: php-pear-Mail In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605170815.k4H8FDsW032108@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Mail https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190066 Bug 190066 depends on bug 190252, which changed state. Bug 190252 Summary: /usr/lib/php/pear used for "noarch" pear RPM. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190252 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |ERRATA Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 17 09:33:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 05:33:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192060] New: Review Request: blobwars - Mission and Objective based 2D Platform Game Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192060 Summary: Review Request: blobwars - Mission and Objective based 2D Platform Game Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/blobwars.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/blobwars-1.05-1.src.rpm Description: Blob Wars : Metal Blob Solid. This is Episode I of the Blob Wars Saga. You must undertake the role of fearless Blob solider, Bob, as he infiltrates various enemy installations and hideouts in an attempt to rescue as many MIAs as possible. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 17 09:38:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 05:38:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189268] Review Request: xscreensaver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605170938.k4H9cR9k020083@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xscreensaver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189268 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-05-17 05:38 EST ------- I saw that this bug is blocked by FE-ACCEPT. But currently it seems that I have no sponsors on my cvsgroup. Note: This is my first review package. I made this bug block FE-NEEDSPONCER. My srpm and spec are still on http://www.ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~mtasaka/dist/extras/development/SRPMS/xscreensaver-4.24-3.src.rpm and http://www.ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~mtasaka/dist/extras/development/SPECS/xscreensaver.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 17 09:38:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 05:38:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 183912] Review Request: jack-audio-connection-kit - The Jack Audio Connection Kit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605170938.k4H9cgB2020128@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jack-audio-connection-kit - The Jack Audio Connection Kit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183912 ------- Additional Comments From andy at smile.org.ua 2006-05-17 05:38 EST ------- We need to own the directory itself. Due to we can't use the trailing slash in form like: %{_libdir}/jack/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 17 09:45:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 05:45:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191239] Review Request: qjackctl - Qt based JACK control application In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605170945.k4H9jp3o021781@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qjackctl - Qt based JACK control application https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191239 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-05-17 05:45 EST ------- (In reply to comment #10) > Seems to me if you're worried about reproducible builds, really you should be > using a controlled chroot environment. (mock) Reproducability of builds is about it working equally well for someone downloading the SRPM to their desktop system and building it there as it does for someone using a clean buildsystem like mock. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 17 09:49:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 05:49:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189268] Review Request: xscreensaver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605170949.k4H9ndOg022638@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xscreensaver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189268 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-05-17 05:49 EST ------- Another question: Jamie and me are discussing for releasing 5 now. In the discussion one of the most concerns is about removing some hacks for Fedora packages. Ray, could you tell us why the hacks (in remove-display-modes) were selected to be removed from Fedora packages? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 17 09:50:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 05:50:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 183912] Review Request: jack-audio-connection-kit - The Jack Audio Connection Kit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605170950.k4H9o918022719@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jack-audio-connection-kit - The Jack Audio Connection Kit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183912 ------- Additional Comments From andy at smile.org.ua 2006-05-17 05:50 EST ------- Updated version here: ftp://andriy.asplinux.com.ua/pub/people/andy/extras/jack-audio-connection-kit-0. 101.1-7.src.rpm All changed except %files section, -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 17 09:54:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 05:54:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189375] Re-Review Request: Maelstrom: space combat game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605170954.k4H9s9VO023633@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Re-Review Request: Maelstrom: space combat game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189375 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-05-17 05:53 EST ------- (In reply to comment #9) > %{__id_u} -n? Cute. I wonder why anyone would ever want to macro override id. :) Perhaps because, for instance, Fedora has id in /usr/bin but Mandriva has it in /bin ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 17 10:25:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 06:25:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 183912] Review Request: jack-audio-connection-kit - The Jack Audio Connection Kit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605171025.k4HAP7nv030506@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jack-audio-connection-kit - The Jack Audio Connection Kit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183912 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-05-17 06:24 EST ------- (In reply to comment #41) > We need to own the directory itself. Due to we can't use the trailing slash in > form like: > %{_libdir}/jack/ Actually: %{_libdir}/jack/ works just fine in this case. The directory is owned as it should be. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 17 10:26:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 06:26:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 173459] Review Request: initng In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605171026.k4HAQjiU030962@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 daner964 at student.liu.se changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #128740|0 |1 is obsolete| | ------- Additional Comments From daner964 at student.liu.se 2006-05-17 06:26 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=129307) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=129307&action=view) initng-ifiles 0.0.4-1 spec file New upstreams ifiles. Nothing new in the spec. Biggest change upstreams seem to be that require_network now is gone in favour of a better solution. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 17 10:52:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 06:52:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 180066] Request: Inclusion of a ruby template file In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605171052.k4HAqtQc005354@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Request: Inclusion of a ruby template file https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=180066 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com Bug 180066 depends on bug 184199, which changed state. Bug 184199 Summary: It is not possible to build noarch ruby packages https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=184199 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |RAWHIDE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 17 11:49:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 07:49:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 185423] Review Request: php-pear-PEAR-Command-Packaging: make-rpm-spec command for PEAR In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605171149.k4HBnEav016982@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-PEAR-Command-Packaging: make-rpm-spec command for PEAR https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=185423 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|fedora-extras- |fedora-package- |list at redhat.com |review at redhat.com Bug 185423 depends on bug 183359, which changed state. Bug 183359 Summary: RFE: upgrade to PEAR 1.4.9 (was: 1.4.7) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183359 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Status|ASSIGNED |MODIFIED Resolution| |ERRATA Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 17 13:44:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 09:44:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191998] Review Request: scrip -- spherical coordinate interpolation and remapping package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605171344.k4HDiIgR010783@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scrip -- spherical coordinate interpolation and remapping package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191998 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |pertusus at free.fr ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-05-17 09:44 EST ------- With the patch, the rpm flags are not acknowledged and the include and libdir are hardcoded, so I propose the attaced patch instead. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 17 13:46:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 09:46:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192049] Review Request: gnash - GNU Flash player In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605171346.k4HDkshD011413@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnash - GNU Flash player https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192049 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2006-05-17 09:46 EST ------- Thanks for the speedy review. :) Sorry I missed the upstream update again.... (In reply to comment #1) > * klash is now gnash-klash for the subpackages upstream, this name should > be used here also for consistency with what will appear. Ok. > * there is a security issue that should be patched in fedora extras package, > indeed there is an insecure use of /tmp. If it is too much work, at least > there should be a note somewhere. Is there a patch from cvs that can be backported for this? > * the documentation should be distributed (see the specfile in the tarball > for hints on how to do this), except if there is a good reason not to > distribute it? At least manpage and html manual, info files and > scrollkeeper files would be bonus Sounds good. I added buildrequires docbook2X for that. (In reply to comment #2) > W: gnash devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/libgnashasobjs.so > W: gnash devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/libgnashbackend.so > W: gnash devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/libgnashgeo.so > W: gnash devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/libgnashserver.so > W: gnash devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/libgnashbase.so I removed them for now. > There is also this warning that may be problematic, although I don't > know how to solve it: > E: klash binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/lib/kde3/libklashpart.so > ['/usr/lib', '/usr/lib/qt-3.3/lib'] I added --disable-rpath to configure. > * Maybe the gnash package should be in > Group: Applications/Multimedia > and not in Applications/Internet (the plugins are rightly in Applications/Internet). Thanks, fixed. I also subpackaged the libraries. http://people.redhat.com/petersen/extras/gnash.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/petersen/extras/gnash-0.7.1-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 17 13:48:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 09:48:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191998] Review Request: scrip -- spherical coordinate interpolation and remapping package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605171348.k4HDmuso011874@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scrip -- spherical coordinate interpolation and remapping package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191998 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-05-17 09:48 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=129318) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=129318&action=view) use variables on make command line to change compilation defaults -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 17 14:05:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 10:05:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 174952] Review Request: lightning - GNU Lightning In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605171405.k4HE5W91016276@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lightning - GNU Lightning https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174952 Jochen at herr-schmitt.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 17 14:08:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 10:08:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187266] Review Request: gprolog - GNU Prolog is a free Prolog compiler In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605171408.k4HE8VWn017262@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gprolog - GNU Prolog is a free Prolog compiler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187266 Jochen at herr-schmitt.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 17 14:47:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 10:47:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191624] Review Request: perl-Test-Expect - Automated driving and testing of terminal-based programs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605171447.k4HElZ2p032044@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-Expect - Automated driving and testing of terminal-based programs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191624 ------- Additional Comments From jpo at di.uminho.pt 2006-05-17 10:47 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > Module::Build is still having trouble in development; I'll review this on FC5. > (We really should try to help Steve with that.) Last saturday I started looking into it but gave up after one hour or so - I also wasn't able to see why perl(YAML) < 0.49 is being required. I will try again later in the day and/or tomorrow. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 17 14:49:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 10:49:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190000] Review Request: partimage In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605171449.k4HEnCEk032640@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: partimage https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190000 ------- Additional Comments From dcantrel at redhat.com 2006-05-17 10:48 EST ------- Dump it. I don't want to gut the NTFS code from partimage and then include that because it would (a) be annoying to maintain, (b) be less featureful than what people have asked for, and (c) result in an endless stream of emails from people asking to enable NTFS support. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 17 14:51:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 10:51:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192049] Review Request: gnash - GNU Flash player In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605171451.k4HEpl0C001255@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnash - GNU Flash player https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192049 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-05-17 10:51 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > > * there is a security issue that should be patched in fedora extras package, > > indeed there is an insecure use of /tmp. If it is too much work, at least > > there should be a note somewhere. > > Is there a patch from cvs that can be backported for this? Unfortunately not. I raised the issue on the gnash-dev list, though. That's the only thing that retained me from proposing gnash to FE ;-) > > * the documentation should be distributed (see the specfile in the tarball > > for hints on how to do this), except if there is a good reason not to > > distribute it? At least manpage and html manual, info files and > > scrollkeeper files would be bonus > > Sounds good. I added buildrequires docbook2X for that. This shouldn't be needed, as the files are allready up to date in the tarball. Doesn't hurt, though. There is a bug in doc/C/Makefile.am regarding info files installation during staged install. I'll attach patches. > > W: gnash devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/libgnashbase.so > > I removed them for now. Agreed, this seems to be the best solution until they are really usefull to develop something. > I also subpackaged the libraries. Really? It doesn't seems so to me... Anyway I think it is better to have the libraries together with the standalone player. But if you want to split, you can; -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 17 14:55:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 10:55:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192049] Review Request: gnash - GNU Flash player In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605171455.k4HEt71e002503@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnash - GNU Flash player https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192049 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-05-17 10:54 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=129322) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=129322&action=view) use patch to skip install-info error -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 17 14:57:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 10:57:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192049] Review Request: gnash - GNU Flash player In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605171457.k4HEv7Mb003078@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnash - GNU Flash player https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192049 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-05-17 10:56 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=129323) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=129323&action=view) don't stop on install-info errors during staged install -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 17 15:04:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 11:04:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191998] Review Request: scrip -- spherical coordinate interpolation and remapping package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605171504.k4HF4Dt0005279@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scrip -- spherical coordinate interpolation and remapping package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191998 ------- Additional Comments From ed at eh3.com 2006-05-17 11:04 EST ------- Hi Patrice, that certainly is an improvement -- thank you! And here are the updated files: http://mitgcm.org/eh3/fedora_misc/scrip-1.4-4.src.rpm http://mitgcm.org/eh3/fedora_misc/scrip.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 17 15:13:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 11:13:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177583] Review Request: zaptel-kmod In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605171513.k4HFD3d2008248@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: zaptel-kmod https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177583 arechenberg at shermfin.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |arechenberg at shermfin.com ------- Additional Comments From arechenberg at shermfin.com 2006-05-17 11:12 EST ------- Am I missing something? There is no %files section in the spec so I get an "Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:" error. Does the updated kmodtool create the %files section? (I'm new to the Extras packaging process). I'm using FC5 with with fedora-kmodhelper from fedora-rpmdevtools 1.5-1.fc5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 17 15:13:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 11:13:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190000] Review Request: partimage In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605171513.k4HFDj9I008541@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: partimage https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190000 jkeating at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 17 15:14:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 11:14:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187913] Review Request: mysql-query-browser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605171514.k4HFEr0a008975@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mysql-query-browser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187913 ------- Additional Comments From adrian at lisas.de 2006-05-17 11:14 EST ------- This blocks FC-REVIEW and not FE-REVIEW. This seems wrong. So the correct number to block would be 163778 instead of 188267. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 17 15:31:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 11:31:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177583] Review Request: zaptel-kmod In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605171531.k4HFV9wd014570@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: zaptel-kmod https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177583 ------- Additional Comments From jeff at ollie.clive.ia.us 2006-05-17 11:31 EST ------- (In reply to comment #30) > Am I missing something? There is no %files section in the spec so I get an > "Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:" error. Does the updated kmodtool > create the %files section? (I'm new to the Extras packaging process). > > I'm using FC5 with with fedora-kmodhelper from fedora-rpmdevtools 1.5-1.fc5 The %files section is generated by the kmodtool. The spec should be using the kmodtool script that is in the SRPM. I just tested rebuilding the SRPM on FC5 with kernel 2.6.16-1.2111_FC5 and the build completed just fine. There's a new version of zaptel due within a few days so I'll be updating the SRPM with the new version. At that time I'll make sure that the spec conforms to the latest revison of the kernel module guidelines. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 17 15:34:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 11:34:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191200] Review Request: lvm2-cluster In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605171534.k4HFYb2K016172@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lvm2-cluster https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191200 ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-05-17 11:34 EST ------- Also, Requires(preun): chkconfig Requires(post): chkconfig Looking closer, you have some %pre and %preun tasks commented out. I think these tasks were what was driving the Requires(pre) of lvm2 and device-mapper. Since these are commented out, you should also comment out or remove the Requires(pre) on these things. I see only a preun-req on chkconfig, and a post require on chkconfig. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 17 15:35:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 11:35:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187913] Review Request: mysql-query-browser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605171535.k4HFZtsW016728@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mysql-query-browser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187913 imlinux at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|188267 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From imlinux at gmail.com 2006-05-17 11:35 EST ------- Sorry bout that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 17 15:36:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 11:36:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177583] Review Request: zaptel-kmod In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605171536.k4HFaQJt017056@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: zaptel-kmod https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177583 ------- Additional Comments From arechenberg at shermfin.com 2006-05-17 11:36 EST ------- Yep ... I'm dumb. It built just fine without me mucking around with the spec :) I was trying to use the fedora-kmodhelper instead. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 17 15:42:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 11:42:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189009] Review Request: bzrtools - A collection of utilities and plugins for Bazaar-NG In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605171542.k4HFgAQd019720@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bzrtools - A collection of utilities and plugins for Bazaar-NG https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189009 ------- Additional Comments From orion at cora.nwra.com 2006-05-17 11:42 EST ------- APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 17 15:50:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 11:50:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191200] Review Request: lvm2-cluster In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605171550.k4HFof2P022783@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lvm2-cluster https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191200 ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-05-17 11:50 EST ------- Can't build on FC5 either, as you have a requirement of device-mapper >= 1.02.07, however the latest package in FC5+updates is device-mapper-1.02.02-3.2. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 17 16:39:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 12:39:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191998] Review Request: scrip -- spherical coordinate interpolation and remapping package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605171639.k4HGdYNL005718@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scrip -- spherical coordinate interpolation and remapping package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191998 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-05-17 12:39 EST ------- * rpmlint is silent * naming is good * follow packaging guidelines * licence acceptable and included * spec legible * source match upstream * everything else is fine * builds in mock APPROVED comments: * the timestamp of the sources is wrong, I find it better to have the right timestamp. In general I use spectool to achive that (or maybe wget -N). * the executables in grids/ may be compiled and distributed maybe with scrip_ prefixed, and in that case the README file may also be added, renamed for example README.utils. * the bugs file could be in %docs -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 17 16:51:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 12:51:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191622] Review Request: perl-Expect - Expect for Perl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605171651.k4HGphgk009967@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Expect - Expect for Perl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191622 jpo at di.uminho.pt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From jpo at di.uminho.pt 2006-05-17 12:51 EST ------- Thanks for the review. Imported and built for FC-5 and devel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 17 16:51:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 12:51:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191623] Review Request: perl-Expect-Simple - Wrapper around the Expect module In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605171651.k4HGpiVK009983@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Expect-Simple - Wrapper around the Expect module https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191623 Bug 191623 depends on bug 191622, which changed state. Bug 191622 Summary: Review Request: perl-Expect - Expect for Perl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191622 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 17 16:55:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 12:55:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191623] Review Request: perl-Expect-Simple - Wrapper around the Expect module In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605171655.k4HGt6pJ010683@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Expect-Simple - Wrapper around the Expect module https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191623 jpo at di.uminho.pt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From jpo at di.uminho.pt 2006-05-17 12:55 EST ------- Thanks for the review. Imported and built for FC-5 and devel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 17 16:55:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 12:55:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191624] Review Request: perl-Test-Expect - Automated driving and testing of terminal-based programs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605171655.k4HGtTr8010885@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-Expect - Automated driving and testing of terminal-based programs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191624 Bug 191624 depends on bug 191623, which changed state. Bug 191623 Summary: Review Request: perl-Expect-Simple - Wrapper around the Expect module https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191623 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 17 17:08:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 13:08:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191998] Review Request: scrip -- spherical coordinate interpolation and remapping package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605171708.k4HH8WU3013722@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scrip -- spherical coordinate interpolation and remapping package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191998 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-05-17 13:08 EST ------- Did anyone notice that the license is not BSD as indicated in the spec? I believe it is free according to the Open Source Definition, but the text certainly does not resemble the BSD license text and the derivative works clause: If SOFTWARE is modified to produce derivative works, such modified SOFTWARE should be clearly marked, so as not to confuse it with the version available from Los Alamos National Laboratory. is not present in the BSD license. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 17 17:26:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 13:26:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191998] Review Request: scrip -- spherical coordinate interpolation and remapping package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605171726.k4HHQdMN019528@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scrip -- spherical coordinate interpolation and remapping package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191998 ------- Additional Comments From ed at eh3.com 2006-05-17 13:26 EST ------- Hi Jason, you're right that its not exactly BSD. It does appear to be sufficiently "open" in that it allows modification, redistribution, sale, etc. So I think the licesnse terms are perfectly acceptable for inclusion in FE. The only question that remains is "what should we call the license?" I'll be happy to change the license name in the spec before it gets built and pushed (it was just imported). What would you folks like to call it? Woiuld the "SCRIP License" be OK? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 17 18:17:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 14:17:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192060] Review Request: blobwars - Mission and Objective based 2D Platform Game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605171817.k4HIHTAt005372@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: blobwars - Mission and Objective based 2D Platform Game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192060 ------- Additional Comments From Jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2006-05-17 14:17 EST ------- Good: * Tar in source RPM is the same as upstream * Local build work fine * Mock build worde fine. Bad: - Duplicate BuildRequires: SDL-devel (by SDL_mixer-devel) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 17 18:24:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 14:24:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192119] New: Review Request: tuxkart - Kids 3D go-kart racing game featuring Tux Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192119 Summary: Review Request: tuxkart - Kids 3D go-kart racing game featuring Tux Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/tuxkart.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/tuxkart-0.4.0-1.src.rpm Description: 3D go-kart racing game for kids with several famous OpenSource mascots participating. Race as Tux against 3 computer players in 6 different fun race courses (Standard race track, Dessert, Mathclass, etc). Full information on how to add your own race courses is included. During the race you can pick up powerups such as: (homing) missiles, magnets and portable zippers. Note, You need a plib build with the patch attached to bug 192086 because of the fullscreen support I've added. This really is not a game to play in a window. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 17 18:27:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 14:27:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192119] Review Request: tuxkart - Kids 3D go-kart racing game featuring Tux In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605171827.k4HIRB6U008472@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tuxkart - Kids 3D go-kart racing game featuring Tux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192119 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |192086 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 17 18:28:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 14:28:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189603] Review Request: libgalago In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605171828.k4HISQOY008892@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgalago https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189603 bdpepple at ameritech.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at ameritech.net 2006-05-17 14:28 EST ------- Built for FC5 & devel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 17 18:28:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 14:28:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187430] Review Request: elektra In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605171828.k4HISdIe008942@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: elektra https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187430 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-05-17 14:28 EST ------- blockers: * changelog * source not found * .so for libelekra should be in a devel package rpmlint output: W: elektra incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.6.1-3 0.6.1-30 E: elektra invalid-soname /lib/libelektra-filesys.so libelektra-filesys.so E: elektra invalid-soname /lib/libelektra-fstab.so libelektra-fstab.so W: elektra wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/elektra-0.6.1/standards/signature.xml W: elektra devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/libelektratools.so W: elektra devel-file-in-non-devel-package /lib/libelektra.so W: elektra devel-file-in-non-devel-package /lib/libelektra-default.so E: elektra script-without-shellbang /usr/share/doc/elektra-0.6.1/scripts/convert-hwconfKudzu other comments: * --prefix=%{_prefix} and --exec-prefix=/ were unneeded in my tests * The redundant %doc line is not needed in devel subpackage: %doc AUTHORS COPYING ChangeLog README INSTALL -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 17 18:29:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 14:29:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189609] Review Request: galago-daemon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605171829.k4HIT3vs009107@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: galago-daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189609 Bug 189609 depends on bug 189603, which changed state. Bug 189603 Summary: Review Request: libgalago https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189603 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 17 18:47:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 14:47:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191594] Review Request: gtkglextmm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605171847.k4HIlHNF016022@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtkglextmm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191594 ------- Additional Comments From gilles.gagniard at gmail.com 2006-05-17 14:47 EST ------- The release tag is incremented. Here are now the new URLs : Spec URL: http://jaile.ath.cx/gilles/fedora_core_5/gtkglextmm.spec SRPM URL: http://jaile.ath.cx/gilles/fedora_core_5/gtkglextmm-1.2.0-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 17 18:53:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 14:53:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192124] New: Review Request: exiv2: Exif and Iptc metadata manipulation library and tools Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192124 Summary: Review Request: exiv2: Exif and Iptc metadata manipulation library and tools Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: rdieter at math.unl.edu QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://kde-redhat.unl.edu/apt/kde-redhat/SPECS/exiv2.spec SRPM URL: http://kde-redhat.unl.edu/apt/kde-redhat/all/SRPMS.stable/exiv2-0.9.1-2.src.rpm Description: Exiv2 comprises of a C++ library and a command line utility to access image metadata. Exiv2 supports full read and write access to th Exif and Iptc metadata, Exif MakerNote support, extract and delete methods for Exif thumbnails, classes to access Ifd and so on. The command line utility allow you to: * print the Exif metadata of Jpeg images as summary info, interpreted values, or the plain data for each tag (here is a sample) * print the Iptc metadata of Jpeg images * print the Jpeg comment of Jpeg images * set, add and delete Exif and Iptc metadata of Jpeg images * adjust the Exif timestamp (that's how it all started...) * rename Exif image files according to the Exif timestamp * extract, insert and delete Exif metadata, Iptc metadata and Jpeg comments * extract, insert and delete the thumbnail image embedded in the Exif metadata -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 17 18:57:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 14:57:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192124] Review Request: exiv2: Exif and Iptc metadata manipulation library and tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605171857.k4HIvrvC019817@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: exiv2: Exif and Iptc metadata manipulation library and tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192124 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |191784 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 17 19:00:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 15:00:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191998] Review Request: scrip -- spherical coordinate interpolation and remapping package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605171900.k4HJ0nio020880@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scrip -- spherical coordinate interpolation and remapping package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191998 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-05-17 15:00 EST ------- I don't think it corresponds to any existing license, but I agree that it's certainly free enough. (Item 4 of the Open Source Definition allows requiring the marking or renaming of derivative works.) Are there other packages which use the same license? If not, "SCRIP License" is probably fine but you'll have to endure the rpmlint warning. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 17 19:08:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 15:08:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189375] Re-Review Request: Maelstrom: space combat game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605171908.k4HJ8OYi023040@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Re-Review Request: Maelstrom: space combat game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189375 ------- Additional Comments From notting at redhat.com 2006-05-17 15:07 EST ------- Doesn't mean it needs to be in the package. I'll hit up extras-list. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 17 19:40:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 15:40:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192124] Review Request: exiv2: Exif and Iptc metadata manipulation library and tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605171940.k4HJeGUS000856@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: exiv2: Exif and Iptc metadata manipulation library and tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192124 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |kevin at tummy.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-05-17 15:40 EST ------- See below- Rpmlint output. OK - Package name. OK - Spec file name matches. OK - Package guidelines. OK - Licsense. (GPL) OK - License field matches in spec. OK - License included in files OK - Spec in american english OK - Spec legible OK - Md5sum of source from upstream 4c6593751368f5e9235d85e0d4058e67 exiv2-0.9.1.tar.gz 4c6593751368f5e9235d85e0d4058e67 exiv2-0.9.1.tar.gz.1 OK - Compiles and builds on one arch at least. (devel in mock) OK - No Forbidden buildrequires included OK - All required buildrequires included OK - Ldconfig in post/postun if including libs. OK - Owns all directories it creates. OK - No duplicate files in %files listing. See below - Permissions on files correct. OK - Clean section correct. OK - Macros consistant. OK - Code not content. OK - Docs must not affect runtime. OK - Header files/libs in a devel package. OK - .so files in devel package. OK - Devel package requires base package. OK - No .la files. OK - Doesn't own any files/dirs that are already owned by others. OK - Package builds in mock. See below - - Docs subpackage needed for large documentations. issues: 1. The description doesn't scan in some places. Might be reworked? Perhaps something like: -Exiv2 comprises of a C++ library and a command line utility to access image -metadata. Exiv2 supports full read and write access to th Exif and Iptc +Exiv2 consists of a C++ library and a command line utility to access image +metadata. Exiv2 supports full read and write access to the Exif and Iptc metadata, Exif MakerNote support, extract and delete methods for Exif thumbnails, classes to access Ifd and so on. -The command line utility allow you to: +The command line utility allows you to: * print the Exif metadata of Jpeg images as summary info, interpreted values, -or the plain data for each tag (here is a sample) +or the plain data for each tag * print the Iptc metadata of Jpeg images * print the Jpeg comment of Jpeg images * set, add and delete Exif and Iptc metadata of Jpeg images * adjust the Exif timestamp (that's how it all started...) * rename Exif image files according to the Exif timestamp -* extract, insert and delete Exif metadata, Iptc metadata and Jpeg comments -* extract, insert and delete the thumbnail image embedded in the Exif metadata +* extract, insert and delete Exif metadata (including thumbnails), +Iptc metadata and Jpeg comments 2. 2 lines of rpmlint output: W: exiv2 unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib/libexiv2-0.9.1.so Suggest: This file is mode 644, should be 755 so rpm can strip it/make proper debuginfo? E: exiv2 binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/exiv2 ['/usr/lib'] Suggest: add --disable-rpath to configure? 3. Might be worth moving the /usr/share/doc/exiv2-devel-0.9.1/html/ to a -doc subpackage? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 17 19:41:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 15:41:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 173459] Review Request: initng In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605171941.k4HJfViv001322@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 ------- Additional Comments From che666 at gmail.com 2006-05-17 15:41 EST ------- with 0.0.4 ifiles and cleanly regenned runlevels the agettys dont spawn for me. just investigating the problem. can anyone confirm? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 17 19:42:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 15:42:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191998] Review Request: scrip -- spherical coordinate interpolation and remapping package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605171942.k4HJgj99001797@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scrip -- spherical coordinate interpolation and remapping package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191998 ed at eh3.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From ed at eh3.com 2006-05-17 15:42 EST ------- Hi Patrice and Jason, thank you for the patch and speedy reviews! I've incorporated almost all of your changes and will, as soon as I get some more free time, add the SCRIP/grids and namelist files. The package built successfully on devel and FC-4/5 branches have been requested. Thanks again! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 17 20:08:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 16:08:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191628] Review Request: perl-Net-SNMP - Object oriented interface to SNMP In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605172008.k4HK8LKg008683@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-SNMP - Object oriented interface to SNMP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191628 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |tibbs at math.uh.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-05-17 16:08 EST ------- Just a note: The socket6 license seems to be straight "new" BSD to me and should be acceptable for Extras. Compare the license text in http://search.cpan.org/src/UMEMOTO/Socket6-0.19/README with http://www.opensource.org/licenses/bsd-license.php. Crypt::Rijndael builds but fails tests on x86_64. It looks to be unmaintained in any case. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 17 20:11:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 16:11:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189609] Review Request: galago-daemon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605172011.k4HKBond009713@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: galago-daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189609 ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2006-05-17 16:11 EST ------- - rpmlint checks return: W: galago-daemon non-conffile-in-etc /etc/dbus-1/system.d/galago-daemon.conf A non-executable file in your package is being installed in /etc, but is not a configuration file. All non-executable files in /etc should be configuration files. Mark the file as %config in the spec file. W: galago-daemon non-standard-dir-in-usr libexec Non standard but not without precedent. I'm inclined to ignore. - package meets naming guidelines - package meets packaging guidelines - license (GPL) OK, text in %doc, matches source - spec file legible, in am. english - source matches upstream - package compiles on FC5 (x86_64) - no missing BR - no unnecessary BR - no locales - not relocatable - owns all directories that it creates - no duplicate files - permissions ok - %clean ok - macro use consistent - code, not content - no need for -docs - nothing in %doc affects runtime - no need for .desktop file APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 17 20:14:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 16:14:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189609] Review Request: galago-daemon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605172014.k4HKEHkH010309@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: galago-daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189609 jpmahowald at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |jpmahowald at gmail.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2006-05-17 16:13 EST ------- - rpmlint checks return: W: galago-daemon non-conffile-in-etc /etc/dbus-1/system.d/galago-daemon.conf A non-executable file in your package is being installed in /etc, but is not a configuration file. All non-executable files in /etc should be configuration files. Mark the file as %config in the spec file. W: galago-daemon non-standard-dir-in-usr libexec Non standard but not without precedent. I'm inclined to ignore. - package meets naming guidelines - package meets packaging guidelines - license (GPL) OK, text in %doc, matches source - spec file legible, in am. english - source matches upstream - package compiles on FC5 (x86_64) - no missing BR - no unnecessary BR - no locales - not relocatable - owns all directories that it creates - no duplicate files - permissions ok - %clean ok - macro use consistent - code, not content - no need for -docs - nothing in %doc affects runtime - no need for .desktop file Mark the config file as %config APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 17 20:57:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 16:57:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192060] Review Request: blobwars - Mission and Objective based 2D Platform Game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605172057.k4HKvM4N025564@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: blobwars - Mission and Objective based 2D Platform Game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192060 ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2006-05-17 16:57 EST ------- "This is Episode I of the Blob Wars Saga." So where will I find Episode II? ;) There is a stray "export" in the %build section. Leftover from debugging perhaps? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 17 21:06:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 17:06:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192144] New: Review Request: musicbox Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192144 Summary: Review Request: musicbox Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: splinux at fedoraproject.org QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://glive.tuxfamily.org/fedora/musicbox/musicbox.spec SRPM URL: http://glive.tuxfamily.org/fedora/musicbox/musicbox-0.2.3-1.src.rpm Description: Musicbox is a simple one-file-at-a-time audio tag editor. It can edit ID3, Vorbis and FLAC tags via the TagLib library. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 17 21:09:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 17:09:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192060] Review Request: blobwars - Mission and Objective based 2D Platform Game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605172109.k4HL9O0A029511@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: blobwars - Mission and Objective based 2D Platform Game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192060 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-05-17 17:08 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > > Bad: > - Duplicate BuildRequires: SDL-devel (by SDL_mixer-devel) Your right, but thats a minor issue, I'll fix it after import, or in a second release / attempt if more issue are found during a proper review. (In reply to comment #2) > "This is Episode I of the Blob Wars Saga." > > So where will I find Episode II? ;) > Episode II isn't finished yet but its undergoing active development and a functional demo is downloadable: http://www.parallelrealities.co.uk/blobAndConquer.php > There is a stray "export" in the %build section. Leftover from debugging perhaps? My bad, it had an export CFLAGS=.... then I thought I could just as well pass that directly to make, so I cut and pasted it to the make line and appearantly forgot to remove the export. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 17 21:14:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 17:14:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192144] Review Request: musicbox In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605172114.k4HLEqf3030613@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: musicbox https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192144 bdpepple at ameritech.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |bdpepple at ameritech.net OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 17 21:22:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 17:22:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192119] Review Request: tuxkart - Kids 3D go-kart racing game featuring Tux In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605172122.k4HLMCBO032112@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tuxkart - Kids 3D go-kart racing game featuring Tux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192119 wart at kobold.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |wart at kobold.org OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2006-05-17 17:21 EST ------- So far I've had no problems building this with the plib patch. I don't feel like mucking around with my mock build configurations to add a patched plib package, so I'll do a review of this without running mock builds. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 17 21:22:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 17:22:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 173459] Review Request: initng In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605172122.k4HLMm2g032349@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 ------- Additional Comments From che666 at gmail.com 2006-05-17 17:22 EST ------- #274 tested head and its already fixed there -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 17 21:28:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 17:28:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 171993] Review Request: mpich2 - An implementation of MPI In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605172128.k4HLSL5h001264@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mpich2 - An implementation of MPI https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=171993 orion at cora.nwra.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |orion at cora.nwra.com ------- Additional Comments From orion at cora.nwra.com 2006-05-17 17:28 EST ------- I've got a heavily updated version here: http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/mpich2-1.0.3-1.fc5.src.rpm How do we want to proceed? Deji - do you still want to be the maintainer? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 17 22:28:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 18:28:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 184530] Review Request: perl-RPM2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605172228.k4HMSrKm012504@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-RPM2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=184530 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-05-17 18:28 EST ------- Didn't the author formerly work for RedHat, and write this while he worked there? Wouldn't RedHat have a record of this license? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 17 22:33:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 18:33:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 176374] Review Request: nagios-plugins In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605172233.k4HMXnBW014002@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nagios-plugins https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176374 ------- Additional Comments From jpo at di.uminho.pt 2006-05-17 18:33 EST ------- This just documents several configure warnings. A future comment will deal with problems in perl and bash plugins. Configure warnings ------------------------------------------------------------ [1] checking for rc_read_config in -lradiusclient... no configure: WARNING: Skipping radius plugin configure: WARNING: install radius libs to compile this plugin (see REQUIREMENTS). [2] checking for lmstat... no configure: WARNING: Get lmstat from Globetrotter Software to monitor flexlm licenses [3] configure: WARNING: Tried /usr/bin/perl - install Net::SNMP perl module if you want to use the perl snmp plugins [4] checking for quakestat... no checking for qstat... no configure: WARNING: Get qstat from http://www.activesw.com/people/steve/qstat.html in order to make check_game plugin [5] checking for qmail-qstat... no configure: WARNING: Could not find qmail-qstat or eqivalent ------------------------------------------------------------ [1] disables the check_radius binary plugin (not built) [2] comercial product the perl plugin - check_flexlm - will not work as expected [3] two perl plugins being removed perl-Net-SNMP review ticket #191628 [4] disables the check_game binary plugin (not built) http://www.qstat.org/ [5] no binary distribution of qmail the check_mailq perl plugin won't be able to check qmail queues Note: Another plugin that appears to be disabled is the check_ide_smart (.c) At least [1], [3], and [4] should be added to a TODO list. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 17 22:42:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 18:42:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191130] Review Request: kmobiletools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605172242.k4HMgShi016286@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kmobiletools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191130 ------- Additional Comments From MeSat at TelusPlanet.net 2006-05-17 18:42 EST ------- As a mobile phone user, I think this would be a great tool to add. I am trying moto4lin which works with my Motorla phone but it would be better to have a full tools available. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 17 22:44:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 18:44:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 171993] Review Request: mpich2 - An implementation of MPI In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605172244.k4HMi7pa017115@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mpich2 - An implementation of MPI https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=171993 ------- Additional Comments From dakingun at gmail.com 2006-05-17 18:43 EST ------- (In reply to comment #13) > I've got a heavily updated version here: > > http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/mpich2-1.0.3-1.fc5.src.rpm > I can't each the above file > How do we want to proceed? Deji - do you still want to be the maintainer? Actually, i have another heavily updated version somewhere too. But it can't go in until openmpi/lam gets re-worked a bit (to allow for their co-existence). Hopefully i submit patches for openmpi and lam by weekend and try to get this moving forward. ftp://czar.eas.yorku.ca/pub/mpich2/mpich2-1.0.3-3.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 17 23:00:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 19:00:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 176374] Review Request: nagios-plugins In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605172300.k4HN03Zt020382@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nagios-plugins https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176374 ------- Additional Comments From jpo at di.uminho.pt 2006-05-17 18:59 EST ------- Missing requirements in perl plugins ------------------------------------ The perl module - utils.pm - as the following lines modified by the configure script (utils.sh also has similar lines). -------- ## updated by autoconf $PATH_TO_RPCINFO = "/usr/sbin/rpcinfo" ; $PATH_TO_NTPDATE = "/usr/sbin/ntpdate" ; $PATH_TO_NTPDC = "/usr/sbin/ntpdc" ; $PATH_TO_NTPQ = "/usr/sbin/ntpq" ; $PATH_TO_LMSTAT = "" ; $PATH_TO_SMBCLIENT = "/usr/bin/smbclient" ; $PATH_TO_MAILQ = "/usr/bin/mailq"; $PATH_TO_QMAIL_QSTAT = ""; and these variables are used by some of the perl plugins. For example, the check_ntp should require the ntp package Code used by in the check_ntp plugin --------- my $ntpdate = $utils::PATH_TO_NTPDATE; my $ntpq = $utils::PATH_TO_NTPQ; ... open (NTPDATE, $ntpdate . " -q $host 2>&1 |") ... open(NTPQ, $ntpq . " -np $host 2>&1 |") Plugins with missing requirements: * nagios-plugins-mailq should require the /usr/bin/mailq file (or sendmail (?)) * nagios-plugins-ntp should require the ntp package (or the above ntp utilities) * nagios-plugins-disk_smb should require the samba-client package or the /usr/bin/smbclient binary Directory ownership ------------------------------------ the nagios-plugins base rpm should also own the /usr/lib/nagios/plugins/ directory -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 18 00:16:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 20:16:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 185262] Review Request: kchmviewer - CHM viewer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605180016.k4I0Ggjq005555@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kchmviewer - CHM viewer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=185262 ------- Additional Comments From jpo at di.uminho.pt 2006-05-17 20:16 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=129378) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=129378&action=view) Minor patch Thanks. Now you can update the package to version 2.5 :) You need to apply the attached patch (at least for FC-5) and add the following line to the specfile (%files section): %{_datadir}/icons/crystalsvg/*/apps/kchmviewer.png jpo -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 18 00:26:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 20:26:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189656] Review Request: lilypond - A typesetting system for music notation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605180026.k4I0QXGY007276@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lilypond - A typesetting system for music notation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189656 ------- Additional Comments From qspencer at ieee.org 2006-05-17 20:26 EST ------- OK, I have fixed the encoding and buildrequires issues and have bundled the tarball containing the documentation, from which I'm creating a -doc package. The SRPM is now 28 MB, which bigger than the space I had available, so I'm putting this on my own web server, which is unfortunately behind a 128 KB connection, so it is a long download. You may have better luck just getting the spec and downloading the other source tarball from upstream. Anyway, the new spec and SRPM can be found at: http://qspencer.homeip.net/rpm/ The large documentation package does raise one issue: it seems a subpackage can't be noarch if the main package isn't, so we'll have these large -doc packages for each arch, which seems wasteful. Looking around core and extras, it seems some projects actually create a separate SRPM so the docs can be noarch. I'm not sure whether that makes sense here or not. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 18 00:35:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 20:35:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190362] Review Request: unifdef In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605180035.k4I0ZEjJ009261@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: unifdef https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190362 ------- Additional Comments From jpo at di.uminho.pt 2006-05-17 20:34 EST ------- David, Could you see the last paragraphs of http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/CVSSyncNeeded regarding the removal of the devel branch files? TIA, jpo -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 18 00:39:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 20:39:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190362] Review Request: unifdef In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605180039.k4I0daf6010311@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: unifdef https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190362 dwmw2 at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From dwmw2 at redhat.com 2006-05-17 20:39 EST ------- Removed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 18 00:58:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 20:58:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189013] Review Request: python-sqlalchemy - Modular and flexible ORM library for python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605180058.k4I0wBtE014147@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-sqlalchemy - Modular and flexible ORM library for python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189013 jpmahowald at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2006-05-17 20:57 EST ------- rpmlint and I are happy now. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 18 01:57:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 21:57:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192164] New: Review Request: perl-Socket6 - IPv6 related part of the C socket.h defines and structure manipulators Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192164 Summary: Review Request: perl-Socket6 - IPv6 related part of the C socket.h defines and structure manipulators Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: jpo at di.uminho.pt QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://gsd.di.uminho.pt/jpo/software/fedora/perl-Socket6.spec SRPM URL: http://gsd.di.uminho.pt/jpo/software/fedora/perl-Socket6-0.19-2.src.rpm Description: This module supports getaddrinfo() and getnameinfo() to intend to enable protocol independent programing. If your environment supports IPv6, IPv6 related defines such as AF_INET6 are included. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 18 01:58:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 21:58:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191628] Review Request: perl-Net-SNMP - Object oriented interface to SNMP In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605180158.k4I1wTgF025706@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-SNMP - Object oriented interface to SNMP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191628 ------- Additional Comments From jpo at di.uminho.pt 2006-05-17 21:58 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > Just a note: > > The socket6 license seems to be straight "new" BSD to me and should be > acceptable for Extras. Compare the license text in > http://search.cpan.org/src/UMEMOTO/Socket6-0.19/README > with http://www.opensource.org/licenses/bsd-license.php. > > Crypt::Rijndael builds but fails tests on x86_64. It looks to be unmaintained > in any case. Tibbs, Thanks for the license information and the building report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 18 02:39:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 22:39:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191473] Review Request: kdiff3: Compare + merge 2 or 3 files or directories In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605180239.k4I2df2T002134@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdiff3: Compare + merge 2 or 3 files or directories https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191473 jpo at di.uminho.pt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jpo at di.uminho.pt ------- Additional Comments From jpo at di.uminho.pt 2006-05-17 22:39 EST ------- BTW version 0.9.90 is out. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 18 03:18:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 23:18:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191130] Review Request: kmobiletools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605180318.k4I3Igmj011337@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kmobiletools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191130 ------- Additional Comments From dennis at ausil.us 2006-05-17 23:18 EST ------- kmobiletools doesnt do everything. it does not provide a way to put pictures and files on you phone or to take them off. It allows you to manage sms and phone book -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 18 03:59:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 23:59:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191603] Review Request: rsnapshot -- rsync-based filesystem snapshots In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605180359.k4I3xtQe021119@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rsnapshot -- rsync-based filesystem snapshots https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191603 ------- Additional Comments From lists at forevermore.net 2006-05-17 23:59 EST ------- ok, spec and src.rpm have been updated to take the best of both. I've also been offered the job of maintaining the upstream spec (which should be the same thing as this one). Spec URL: http://forevermore.net/files/packages/rsnapshot/rsnapshot.spec SRPM URL: http://forevermore.net/files/packages/rsnapshot/rsnapshot-1.2.3-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 18 04:13:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 00:13:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191628] Review Request: perl-Net-SNMP - Object oriented interface to SNMP In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605180413.k4I4DokF023879@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-SNMP - Object oriented interface to SNMP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191628 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-05-18 00:13 EST ------- * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. It's not included separately in the package, but this is not necessary as the upstream tarball does not include it. * source files match upstream: 0e717723f843ab22a93248833f3ebff7 Net-SNMP-5.2.0.tar.gz 0e717723f843ab22a93248833f3ebff7 Net-SNMP-5.2.0.tar.gz-srpm * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane. * no shared libraries are present. * package is not relocatable. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * %clean is present. * %check is present and all tests pass: All tests successful. Files=3, Tests=28, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.20 cusr + 0.03 csys = 0.23 CPU) * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no libtool .la droppings. * not a GUI app. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 18 05:18:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 01:18:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192119] Review Request: tuxkart - Kids 3D go-kart racing game featuring Tux In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605180518.k4I5IcTB001722@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tuxkart - Kids 3D go-kart racing game featuring Tux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192119 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-05-18 01:18 EST ------- One last important note which I forgot: you need to add -DXF86VIDMODE to the CXXFLAGS when compiling plib with this patch, so the new configure line should become: %configure CXXFLAGS="%{optflags} -fPIC -DXF86VIDMODE" -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 18 05:21:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 01:21:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191782] Review Request: rafkill - Top-down shooter with powerups In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605180521.k4I5Ldun002076@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rafkill - Top-down shooter with powerups https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191782 jpmahowald at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |jpmahowald at gmail.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2006-05-18 01:21 EST ------- - rpmlint checks return clean - package meets naming guidelines - package meets packaging guidelines - license (GPL) OK, text in %doc, matches source - spec file legible, in am. english - source matches upstream - package compiles on FC5 (x86_64) - no missing BR - no unnecessary BR - no locales - not relocatable - owns all directories that it creates - no duplicate files - permissions ok - %clean ok - macro use consistent - code, not content - no need for -docs - nothing in %doc affects runtime - .desktop file - works! APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 18 05:21:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 01:21:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 168690] Review Request: pyBackPack (GTK+ Python backup tool) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605180521.k4I5LuLH002146@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyBackPack (GTK+ Python backup tool) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=168690 ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2006-05-18 01:21 EST ------- This seems to be redundant: %attr(755,root,root) %{python_sitearch}/pybackpack/gui.py %attr(755,root,root) %{python_sitearch}/pybackpack/findfiles.py %attr(755,root,root) %{python_sitearch}/pybackpack/rdiff_interface.py %{python_sitearch}/pybackpack/*.py and causes these warnings: warning: File listed twice: /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/pybackpack/findfiles.py warning: File listed twice: /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/pybackpack/gui.py warning: File listed twice: /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/pybackpack/rdiff_interface.py when building the rpm. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 18 05:30:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 01:30:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 168690] Review Request: pyBackPack (GTK+ Python backup tool) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605180530.k4I5U4tn003738@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyBackPack (GTK+ Python backup tool) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=168690 peter at thecodergeek.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |peter at thecodergeek.com ------- Additional Comments From peter at thecodergeek.com 2006-05-18 01:29 EST ------- Bernard: A similar issue occurs with my Scribes packaging. If it helps, I've worked around that by using a simple `chmod +x` in %install, thus not needing to specify the %attr for these in the %files section; and the glob can take care of it all. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 18 06:53:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 02:53:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 168690] Review Request: pyBackPack (GTK+ Python backup tool) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605180653.k4I6ruv8019098@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyBackPack (GTK+ Python backup tool) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=168690 ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2006-05-18 02:53 EST ------- There also seems to be a serious issue with recursively following symbolic links: $ mkdir testdir $ cd testdir && ln -sf / root create a backup set using only testdir, and attemp to backup. Observe strace output: stat64("/home/bjohnson/testdir/root/home/bjohnson/testdir/root/home/bjohnson/testdir/root/home/bjohnson/testdir/root/home/bjohnson/testdir/root/home/bjohnson/testdir/root/home/bjohnson/testdir/root/home/bjohnson/testdir/root/home/bjohnson/testdir/root/home/bjohnson/testdir/root/home/bjohnson/testdir/root/home/bjohnson/testdir/root/home/bjohnson/testdir/root/home/bjohnson/testdir/root/home/bjohnson/testdir/root/home/bjohnson/testdir/root/home/bjohnson/testdir/root/home/bjohnson/testdir/root/home/bjohnson/testdir/root/home/bjohnson/testdir/root/home/bjohnson/testdir/root/home/bjohnson/testdir/root/home/bjohnson/testdir/root/home/bjohnson/testdir/root/home/bjohnson/testdir/root/home/bjohnson/testdir/root/home/bjohnson/testdir/root/home/bjohnson/testdir/root/home/bjohnson/testdir/root/home/bjohnson/testdir/root/home/bjohnson/testdir/root/home/bjohnson/testdir/root/home/bjohnson/testdir/root/home/bjohnson/testdir/root/home/bjohnson/testdir/root/home/bjohnson/testdir/root/home/bjo! hnson/testdir/root/home/bjohnson/testdir/root/home/bjohnson/testdir/root/home/bjohnson/testdir/root/home/bjohnson/svn/tacomis/tags/v_1-8-1/demo/.svn/empty-file", {st_mode=S_IFREG|0444, st_size=0, ...}) = 0 access("/home/bjohnson/testdir/root/home/bjohnson/testdir/root/home/bjohnson/testdir/root/home/bjohnson/testdir/root/home/bjohnson/testdir/root/home/bjohnson/testdir/root/home/bjohnson/testdir/root/home/bjohnson/testdir/root/home/bjohnson/testdir/root/home/bjohnson/testdir/root/home/bjohnson/testdir/root/home/bjohnson/testdir/root/home/bjohnson/testdir/root/home/bjohnson/testdir/root/home/bjohnson/testdir/root/home/bjohnson/testdir/root/home/bjohnson/testdir/root/home/bjohnson/testdir/root/home/bjohnson/testdir/root/home/bjohnson/testdir/root/home/bjohnson/testdir/root/home/bjohnson/testdir/root/home/bjohnson/testdir/root/home/bjohnson/testdir/root/home/bjohnson/testdir/root/home/bjohnson/testdir/root/home/bjohnson/testdir/root/home/bjohnson/testdir/root/home/bjohnson/testdir/root/home/bjohnson/testdir/root/home/bjohnson/testdir/root/home/bjohnson/testdir/root/home/bjohnson/testdir/root/home/bjohnson/testdir/root/home/bjohnson/testdir/root/home/bjohnson/testdir/root/home/bjo! hnson/testdir/root/home/bjohnson/testdir/root/home/bjohnson/testdir/root/home/bjohnson/testdir/root/home/bjohnson/svn/tacomis/tags/v_1-8-1/demo/.svn/empty-file", R_OK) = 0 The result is the gui hangs and eats cpu while it tries to resolve this link. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 18 06:58:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 02:58:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 184530] Review Request: perl-RPM2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605180658.k4I6wJFN019871@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-RPM2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=184530 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-05-18 02:58 EST ------- (In reply to comment #11) > Didn't the author formerly work for RedHat, and write this while he worked > there? Wouldn't RedHat have a record of this license? Or, in a similar vein, is the copyright of works produced by employees whilst working for Red Hat assigned to Red Hat? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 18 07:12:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 03:12:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191782] Review Request: rafkill - Top-down shooter with powerups In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605180712.k4I7ClI4022138@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rafkill - Top-down shooter with powerups https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191782 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-05-18 03:12 EST ------- Thanks for the review! Imported and build. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 18 07:21:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 03:21:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191594] Review Request: gtkglextmm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605180721.k4I7LY4h024031@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtkglextmm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191594 rc040203 at freenet.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2006-05-18 03:21 EST ------- Package looks fine, except one issue remaining: You are shipping libtool archives (*.la). The PackageGuideLines Gods want you to remove them. I for one consider this part of the package guidelines as in error, and therefore will not force anybody to remove *.la, but will leave such a decision to the packager. I.e. decide on yourself if you want to ship them or not. APPROVED. To get sponsored, please proceed with "Get a Fedora Account" on http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/Contributors -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 18 08:31:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 04:31:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 185951] Review Request: amsn : msn messenger clone In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605180831.k4I8Vt2m009811@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: amsn : msn messenger clone https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=185951 ------- Additional Comments From tjikkun at xs4all.nl 2006-05-18 04:31 EST ------- I updated the spec and srpm to a new upstream version. I also removed some tcl packages that were shipped with amsn that i now Require: amsn 0.96 is going to be released soon so I hope someone will sponsor me so I can release the rpm at the same time. http://amsn.hoentjen.eu/download/amsn.spec http://amsn.hoentjen.eu/download/amsn-0.96-0.5.20060517svn.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 18 08:37:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 04:37:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190027] Review Request: hexter-dssi - DSSI software synthesizer plugin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605180837.k4I8bDNn011263@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hexter-dssi - DSSI software synthesizer plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190027 ------- Additional Comments From seg at haxxed.com 2006-05-18 04:37 EST ------- You're missing a buildreq on liblo-devel. And hexter can build against gtk2, changing the buildreq to gtk2-devel is probably preferable. rpmlint comes up clean. All those Requires: can be nuked, rely on auto deps. However: $ rpm -qf /usr/lib/dssi/ file /usr/lib/dssi is not owned by any package dssi seems to be implemented as only a header file. No library. So there's no library dep to pick up on. All dssi plugins are probably going to have to have Requires: dssi. You might want to symlink /usr/bin/hexter to /usr/bin/jack-dssi-host. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 18 08:42:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 04:42:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190027] Review Request: hexter-dssi - DSSI software synthesizer plugin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605180842.k4I8gwoQ012785@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hexter-dssi - DSSI software synthesizer plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190027 seg at haxxed.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |189892 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 18 08:43:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 04:43:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189892] Review Request: dssi - Disposable Soft Synth Interface In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605180843.k4I8hBcW012874@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dssi - Disposable Soft Synth Interface https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189892 seg at haxxed.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |190027 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 18 08:56:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 04:56:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 185951] Review Request: amsn : msn messenger clone In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605180856.k4I8uOAR016587@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: amsn : msn messenger clone https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=185951 ------- Additional Comments From hugo at devin.com.br 2006-05-18 04:56 EST ------- BTW, I don't think "soon" is enough. You should provide a package to the current version too, getting into Extras first, then updating it as the next release comes. I say this because leaving the release for later isn't good. I think the most important thing is to bring this good app to Extras right now, with the current stable version, and then updating it when a new version is release (we all don't know when this will occur, and looking at amsn's history, I think we got to wait ;-) So the summary is: please make a package for version 0.95 :) I would be glad to follow your steps and help on what I can. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 18 08:56:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 04:56:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189892] Review Request: dssi - Disposable Soft Synth Interface In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605180856.k4I8uSDu016619@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dssi - Disposable Soft Synth Interface https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189892 ------- Additional Comments From seg at haxxed.com 2006-05-18 04:56 EST ------- The example synths should probably be put in a dssi-examples package rather than the devel package. I think it needs to be: %dir %{_libdir}/dssi Because the example synths are actually ending up in *both* packages. There's duplicate liblo-devel buildreqs in there. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 18 09:14:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 05:14:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 185951] Review Request: amsn : msn messenger clone In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605180914.k4I9EpoW020273@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: amsn : msn messenger clone https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=185951 ------- Additional Comments From tjikkun at xs4all.nl 2006-05-18 05:14 EST ------- Ok, I did it this way because I fixed some stuff inside amsn, to get it to package correctly. I understand your point and I know amsn doesn't really have a reliable release cycle, but 0.96 might actually be released less then a year after 0.95 ;) Also when I said: "I hope someone will sponsor me so I can release the rpm at the same time" I didn't mean i wouldn't release the svn version (since it is actually more stable then 0.95, 0.96 is more or less a bugfix release). Anyway, I will do an amsn 0.95 package as soon as possible and wait for 0.96 to be released if that is the way to go. Thanks for your comment -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 18 10:36:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 06:36:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190027] Review Request: hexter-dssi - DSSI software synthesizer plugin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605181036.k4IAac3p005556@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hexter-dssi - DSSI software synthesizer plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190027 ------- Additional Comments From seg at haxxed.com 2006-05-18 06:36 EST ------- Or actually, dssi-devel should probably be pulling in liblo-devel. And ladspa, jack, and alsa... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 18 10:41:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 06:41:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192049] Review Request: gnash - GNU Flash player In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605181041.k4IAf1YW006898@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnash - GNU Flash player https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192049 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-05-18 06:40 EST ------- To build in mock in FC-5, I needed libXmu-devel. I don't know if it is really needed by gnash, it doesn't seems so to me, I asked upstream. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 18 11:01:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 07:01:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 181450] Review Request: clamav-exim - Clam AV support files for Exim In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605181101.k4IB1GnG011144@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clamav-exim - Clam AV support files for Exim https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=181450 rpm at timj.co.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |will at netmindz.net ------- Additional Comments From rpm at timj.co.uk 2006-05-18 07:01 EST ------- If "clamd.SERVICE" truly is wrong, I think it should be fixed "upstream" in clamd-wrapper rather than just ignoring clamd-wrapper. I've emailed the Enrico offline to solicit his comments. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 18 11:21:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 07:21:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 185423] Review Request: php-pear-PEAR-Command-Packaging: make-rpm-spec command for PEAR In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605181121.k4IBLlEg015105@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-PEAR-Command-Packaging: make-rpm-spec command for PEAR https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=185423 ------- Additional Comments From rpm at timj.co.uk 2006-05-18 07:21 EST ------- New version of PEAR_Command_Packaging has been released All these things should fixed in a new version: http://www.timj.co.uk/linux/specs/php-pear-PEAR-Command-Packaging.spec http://www.timj.co.uk/linux/srpms/php-pear-PEAR-Command-Packaging-0.1.1-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 18 11:32:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 07:32:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192049] Review Request: gnash - GNU Flash player In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605181132.k4IBWqX4017370@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnash - GNU Flash player https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192049 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2006-05-18 07:32 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > > I added buildrequires docbook2X for that. > > This shouldn't be needed, as the files are allready up to date in the > tarball. Doesn't hurt, though. Ok, configure tests for it anyway. > There is a bug in doc/C/Makefile.am regarding info files installation > during staged install. I'll attach patches. Oh, I didn't notice any error. > > I also subpackaged the libraries. > Anyway I think it is better to have > the libraries together with the standalone player. But if you want to > split, you can; Well the libs are required by each of the other subpackages so I thought it makes sense to separate them out: assuming many people would only want one of the plugins. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 18 11:35:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 07:35:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177584] Review Request: zaptel In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605181135.k4IBZAa5017876@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: zaptel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177584 ------- Additional Comments From andy at diginode.net 2006-05-18 07:34 EST ------- The issue with the udev file is still there - --- zaptel.rules 2006-05-18 11:28:15.000000000 +0100 +++ zaptel.rules.clean 2006-05-18 11:28:42.000000000 +0100 @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ -KERNEL=="zapctl", NAME="zap/ctl", OWNER="root", GROUP="root", MODE="0660" -KERNEL=="zaptimer", NAME="zap/timer", OWNER="root", GROUP="root", MODE="0660" -KERNEL=="zapchannel", NAME="zap/channel", OWNER="root", GROUP="root", MODE="0660" -KERNEL=="zappseudo", NAME="zap/pseudo", OWNER="root", GROUP="root", MODE="0660" -KERNEL=="zap[0-9]*", NAME="zap/%n", OWNER="root", GROUP="root", MODE="0660" +KERNEL="zapctl", NAME="zap/ctl", OWNER="root", GROUP="root", MODE="0660" +KERNEL="zaptimer", NAME="zap/timer", OWNER="root", GROUP="root", MODE="0660" +KERNEL="zapchannel", NAME="zap/channel", OWNER="root", GROUP="root", MODE="0660" +KERNEL="zappseudo", NAME="zap/pseudo", OWNER="root", GROUP="root", MODE="0660" +KERNEL="zap[0-9]*", NAME="zap/%n", OWNER="root", GROUP="root", MODE="0660" -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 18 12:57:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 08:57:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192049] Review Request: gnash - GNU Flash player In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605181257.k4ICvv1t001746@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnash - GNU Flash player https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192049 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-05-18 08:57 EST ------- (In reply to comment #8) > (In reply to comment #4) > > There is a bug in doc/C/Makefile.am regarding info files installation > > during staged install. I'll attach patches. > > Oh, I didn't notice any error. That's strange. Do you have /sbin in your path or are you building as root? Not a big deal, it is upstream now. > Well the libs are required by each of the other subpackages so I thought > it makes sense to separate them out: assuming many people would only > want one of the plugins. Indeed, but having the standalone player together with the plugin doesn't hurt and may even help, as sometimes the plugin fails but the standalone player work and the .swf is always downloaded. Once the plugins stream the flash maybe it could be reconsidered. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 18 13:22:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 09:22:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189268] Review Request: xscreensaver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605181322.k4IDMxZl007416@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xscreensaver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189268 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-05-18 09:22 EST ------- Okay, for pre 5.00 version, I updated to 4.99.2.5-0.1. Jamie, I will send another e-mail later. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 18 13:28:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 09:28:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192049] Review Request: gnash - GNU Flash player In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605181328.k4IDSVXp008917@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnash - GNU Flash player https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192049 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-05-18 09:28 EST ------- (In reply to comment #8) > (In reply to comment #4) > > > I added buildrequires docbook2X for that. > > > > This shouldn't be needed, as the files are allready up to date in the > > tarball. Doesn't hurt, though. > > Ok, configure tests for it anyway. Yes, but when not found there is only a warning by configure, the make target still exist but the files are touch'ed instead of being regenerated. However since the output files are up to date they are left untouched and just copied. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 18 13:37:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 09:37:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177584] Review Request: zaptel In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605181337.k4IDb5U7011697@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: zaptel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177584 ------- Additional Comments From jeff at ollie.clive.ia.us 2006-05-18 09:37 EST ------- (In reply to comment #17) > The issue with the udev file is still there - The "extra" equals sign is a udev-version specific thing. I believe it was in udev version 054 where the change was made. The next version of zaptel (due RSN) will conditially generate a udev rules file appropriate for the installed version of udev. As far as the ownership of the device files goes, it makes a lot of sense to run asterisk as a non-root user. How best to accomplish that in RPM packages is something I'll have to look into. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 18 13:45:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 09:45:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191603] Review Request: rsnapshot -- rsync-based filesystem snapshots In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605181345.k4IDjRqS015290@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rsnapshot -- rsync-based filesystem snapshots https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191603 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |tibbs at math.uh.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 18 14:31:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 10:31:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192124] Review Request: exiv2: Exif and Iptc metadata manipulation library and tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605181431.k4IEVfAu028761@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: exiv2: Exif and Iptc metadata manipulation library and tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192124 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-05-18 10:31 EST ------- Spec URL: http://kde-redhat.unl.edu/apt/kde-redhat/SPECS/exiv2.spec SRPM URL: http://kde-redhat.unl.edu/apt/kde-redhat/all/SRPMS.stable/exiv2-0.9.1-3.src.rpm %changelog * Wed May 17 2006 Rex Dieter 0.9.1-3 - cleanup %%description - set eXecute bit on installed lib. - no_rpath patch - deps patch (items get (re)compiled on *every* call to 'make') -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 18 15:01:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 11:01:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192119] Review Request: tuxkart - Kids 3D go-kart racing game featuring Tux In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605181501.k4IF11Uu004109@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tuxkart - Kids 3D go-kart racing game featuring Tux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192119 nphilipp at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |nphilipp at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From nphilipp at redhat.com 2006-05-18 11:00 EST ------- Unfortunately tuxkart includes images that (in some cases might, in others clearly) violate trademarks and/or copyright: images/adverts.rgb: SuSE, Slashdot, Philips, TuxRacer, SourceForge, VA Linux logos, I guess "plib" could be considered safe ;-) images/egypt.rgb: looks like scanned Egyptian drawings images/geeko_icon.rgb, images/players.rgb: resembles SUSE's geeko mascot, don't know whether this is trademarked images/lunchbox.rgb: something that looks like a Barbie doll; images/lunchbox2.rgb: a Pokemon screenshot(?!) images/mnm.rgb: a scanned M&M wrap this issue should be resolved IMO for instance by replacing the images (preferrably upstream). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 18 15:07:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 11:07:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192144] Review Request: musicbox In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605181507.k4IF77gL006076@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: musicbox https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192144 ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at ameritech.net 2006-05-18 11:06 EST ------- Package fails to build in Mock. Your missing a build requirement. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 18 15:13:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 11:13:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 171993] Review Request: mpich2 - An implementation of MPI In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605181513.k4IFDEDH007732@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mpich2 - An implementation of MPI https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=171993 ------- Additional Comments From orion at cora.nwra.com 2006-05-18 11:13 EST ------- (In reply to comment #14) > (In reply to comment #13) > > I've got a heavily updated version here: > > > > http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/mpich2-1.0.3-1.fc5.src.rpm > > > I can't each the above file > Whoops, fixed. > Actually, i have another heavily updated version somewhere too. But it can't go > in until openmpi/lam gets re-worked a bit (to allow for their co-existence). > Hopefully i submit patches for openmpi and lam by weekend and try to get this > moving forward. > ftp://czar.eas.yorku.ca/pub/mpich2/mpich2-1.0.3-3.src.rpm I'll take a look. What do you think needs changing in lam and openmpi? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 18 15:14:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 11:14:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192124] Review Request: exiv2: Exif and Iptc metadata manipulation library and tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605181514.k4IFEkal008164@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: exiv2: Exif and Iptc metadata manipulation library and tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192124 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-05-18 11:14 EST ------- And Re: comment #1: 3. Migh be worth a -doc package? IMO, no, it's not large enough to warrant being packaged separately. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 18 15:25:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 11:25:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177584] Review Request: zaptel In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605181525.k4IFPqrG012033@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: zaptel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177584 ------- Additional Comments From shiva at sewingwitch.com 2006-05-18 11:25 EST ------- If you generate different udev files dynamically based on the udev version, then you should probably also include a versioned Requires on udev. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 18 15:38:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 11:38:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177584] Review Request: zaptel In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605181538.k4IFc6Mg016649@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: zaptel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177584 ------- Additional Comments From jeff at ollie.clive.ia.us 2006-05-18 11:38 EST ------- (In reply to comment #19) > If you generate different udev files dynamically based on the udev version, then > you should probably also include a versioned Requires on udev. Yes, I will. I should also be calling udevstart in %post/%postun too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 18 16:23:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 12:23:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191603] Review Request: rsnapshot -- rsync-based filesystem snapshots In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605181623.k4IGNbGr032459@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rsnapshot -- rsync-based filesystem snapshots https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191603 ------- Additional Comments From jeff at ollie.clive.ia.us 2006-05-18 12:23 EST ------- rsync and openssh-clients need to be BuildRequires too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 18 16:31:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 12:31:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191603] Review Request: rsnapshot -- rsync-based filesystem snapshots In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605181631.k4IGVcv5003348@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rsnapshot -- rsync-based filesystem snapshots https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191603 ------- Additional Comments From lists at forevermore.net 2006-05-18 12:31 EST ------- Didn't realize that configure actually checked for those. Fixed, and also removed the perl requirement, which rpm finds on its own (was told in other places not to include perl as a build requirement because it's "standard", or something like that) Spec URL: http://forevermore.net/files/packages/rsnapshot/rsnapshot.spec SRPM URL: http://forevermore.net/files/packages/rsnapshot/rsnapshot-1.2.3-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 18 16:41:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 12:41:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188180] Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605181641.k4IGfnwa007479@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188180 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-05-18 12:41 EST ------- Re: comment 91 >What about just putting the doc/html area in doc, and both demos and > examples back in devel. That would move off a large amount of docs > and would get rid of all these wacky requirements. The doc subpackage > would just have html stuff in it. assistant and qtdemo could move back to devel. I guess you missed the part about assistant auto-loading docs on startup (comment #57), so assitant and doc/html are tied together. qtdemo I don't see as something strictly needed in a development environment, so, IMO should stay in -doc, but I don't feel strongly about that. > I don't see you using -headerdir, -datadir, and -sysconfdir Not yet, though we're using -libdir (though trivially, for a different reason) > On the desktop-install, shouldn't the vendor be: 'fedora'? That's not a hard/fast rule. It's more important, long-term, that .desktop files reflect upstream and *never* be renamed, so, I chose qt4 instead. > 2. It still doesn't build for me even with the patch from comment #90. Yeah, turns out you can't mix hard-coding the docdir path *and* use %doc pointing to the same place (because using %doc rm -rf everything there first). Fix: set qt_docdir to something else, like back to %%_docdir/%%name-doc-%%version -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 18 16:42:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 12:42:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191603] Review Request: rsnapshot -- rsync-based filesystem snapshots In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605181642.k4IGgGJ9007666@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rsnapshot -- rsync-based filesystem snapshots https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191603 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-05-18 12:42 EST ------- Perl is in the default set of packages; it is recommended that you not included it but this is not a blocker. I'll do a full review after the FESCO meeting. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 18 16:45:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 12:45:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 181450] Review Request: clamav-exim - Clam AV support files for Exim In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605181645.k4IGj3Ai008609@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clamav-exim - Clam AV support files for Exim https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=181450 ------- Additional Comments From orion at cora.nwra.com 2006-05-18 12:45 EST ------- (In reply to comment #6) > If "clamd.SERVICE" truly is wrong, I think it should be fixed "upstream" in > clamd-wrapper rather than just ignoring clamd-wrapper. I've emailed the Enrico > offline to solicit his comments. See also bug 190492 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 18 16:49:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 12:49:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190949] Review Request: gaim-gaym In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605181649.k4IGnKGH010141@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gaim-gaym https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190949 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 18 16:51:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 12:51:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188180] Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605181651.k4IGp3Xl010804@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188180 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-05-18 12:50 EST ------- Re: comment #92: Oh yeah, I did see that, just forgot about it. ;( So, without the -headerdir/-datadir/-sysconfdir is the package currently still parallel installable (x86/x86_64)? I thought there was a hard requirement for vendor on desktop files to be 'fedora', but I can't find it anywhere now, so there must not be. ;) Can you generate a new spec/src.rpm that builds with the docdir fixed? I think we are close now... perhaps we will even get there before 100 comments.;) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 18 17:04:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 13:04:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189010] Review Request: pybaz - Python library bindings for the GNU Arch/Bazaar RCS In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605181704.k4IH4MN5015336@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pybaz - Python library bindings for the GNU Arch/Bazaar RCS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189010 ------- Additional Comments From orion at cora.nwra.com 2006-05-18 13:04 EST ------- Okay, looks like repos are in shape now. I'm reviewing 1.1-2. - md5sums match upstream - rpmlint is silent - builds in mock fc5 Suggestion: - add: %check make check and get the tests to run successfully. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 18 17:04:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 13:04:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188180] Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605181704.k4IH4moI015452@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188180 ------- Additional Comments From laurent.rineau__fc_extra at normalesup.org 2006-05-18 13:04 EST ------- (In reply to comment #93) > So, without the -headerdir/-datadir/-sysconfdir is the package currently > still parallel installable (x86/x86_64)? I'll try to double-compile the package, to check. I'll wait until the spec file is stabilized. Because it takes one hour to compile, on my computer (and also 1GB). In qt4-4.1.2-19.spec, the %{qtdir}/lib symlink is missing (if %{_lib}!="lib"), and a lot of lines of %install fail because of that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 18 17:10:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 13:10:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192124] Review Request: exiv2: Exif and Iptc metadata manipulation library and tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605181710.k4IHAIeV017996@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: exiv2: Exif and Iptc metadata manipulation library and tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192124 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-05-18 13:09 EST ------- In reply to comment #2: Looks good. You might ping upstream with the deps patch and ask them to add a '--disable-rpath' down the road. In reply to comment #3: ok, not a blocker. rpmlint now shows clean and I don't see any further blockers here... so this package is APPROVED. Rememeber to close this review NEXTRELEASE once it's been imported and built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 18 17:10:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 13:10:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188180] Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605181710.k4IHA7ws017920@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188180 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-05-18 13:10 EST ------- > So, without the -headerdir/-datadir/-sysconfdir is the package currently > still parallel installable (x86/x86_64)? By parallel installable, I meant installing different qt4 versions (same arch), ie, qt-4.1.2 and qt-4.2.0 on the same box, not multilib (x86/x86_64). Multilib installs will(should!?) be fine either way. I'll make sure qt4-4.1.2-20 actually builds before posting mods. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 18 17:14:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 13:14:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192124] Review Request: exiv2: Exif and Iptc metadata manipulation library and tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605181714.k4IHENlG019326@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: exiv2: Exif and Iptc metadata manipulation library and tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192124 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-05-18 13:14 EST ------- Thanks, I'll make sure to take both patch issue upstream. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 18 17:28:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 13:28:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192257] New: Review Request: OpenHPI-2.4.1 Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192257 Summary: Review Request: OpenHPI-2.4.1 Product: Fedora Core Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: notting at redhat.com ReportedBy: renierm at us.ibm.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: https://svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/openhpi/openhpi/trunk/openhpi.spec.in SRPM URL: No SRPM. However, Yo can 'make rpm' from the source tarball. Description: OpenHPI is an open ipmlementation of the Hardware Platform Interface (HPI) specification published by the Service Availability Forum (saforum.org). HPI is a registered Carrier Grade Linux requirement. OpenHPI 2.0 is already in Fedora Core 4. OpenHPI 2.2 is in Fedora Core 5. This is a request to review OpenHPI 2.4.1 as an update for Fedora Core 5. A lot of bug fixes have gone into 2.4.1 in addition to ATCA specific enhancements and PPC support (see http://openhpi.sf.net for the changelogs). There is only one dependency change in 2.4.1: OpenIPMI 1.4.20 is required (previously required was OpenIPMI 1.4.16). renierm at us.ibm.com http://openhpi.sf.net -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 18 18:06:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 14:06:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189886] Review Request: FluidSynth - Real-time software synthesizer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605181806.k4II6AEw001849@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: FluidSynth - Real-time software synthesizer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189886 jpmahowald at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |189884 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 18 18:06:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 14:06:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189884] Review Request: LASH Audio Session Handler In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605181806.k4II6W0i001992@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: LASH Audio Session Handler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189884 jpmahowald at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |189886 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 18 18:09:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 14:09:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 185423] Review Request: php-pear-PEAR-Command-Packaging: make-rpm-spec command for PEAR In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605181809.k4II9kYm003101@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-PEAR-Command-Packaging: make-rpm-spec command for PEAR https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=185423 ------- Additional Comments From Fedora at FamilleCollet.com 2006-05-18 14:09 EST ------- php-pear use epoch=1, so i think you should have BuildRequires: php-pear >= 1:1.4.7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 18 18:13:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 14:13:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 171993] Review Request: mpich2 - An implementation of MPI In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605181813.k4IIDQTl004444@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mpich2 - An implementation of MPI https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=171993 ------- Additional Comments From orion at cora.nwra.com 2006-05-18 14:13 EST ------- Interesting how close are spec files are, really. You seem to be further along so I'll drop mine for the most part. Trying to build yours I get: + mv /var/tmp/mpich2-1.0.3-3-root-mockbuild/usr/logfiles /var/tmp/mpich2-1.0.3-3-root-mockbuild/usr/share/mpich2 mv: cannot stat `/var/tmp/mpich2-1.0.3-3-root-mockbuild/usr/logfiles': No such file or directory when compiling in mock on FC5/x86_64. Looks like you don't have BRs for the needed java stuff. Looks like java-devel and libgcj-devel Also: < checking for etags... etags < checking for etags argument to specify language... --language=c --- > checking for etags... no so maybe a BR for emacs-common? Not sure what effect this has yet. Also: < checking for library containing uuid_generate... -luuid --- > checking for library containing uuid_generate... no BR e2fsprogs-devel -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 18 18:25:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 14:25:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189884] Review Request: LASH Audio Session Handler In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605181825.k4IIP6Yl008493@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: LASH Audio Session Handler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189884 jpmahowald at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |183912 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 18 18:25:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 14:25:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 183912] Review Request: jack-audio-connection-kit - The Jack Audio Connection Kit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605181825.k4IIPIjm008629@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jack-audio-connection-kit - The Jack Audio Connection Kit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183912 jpmahowald at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |189884 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 18 18:45:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 14:45:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192119] Review Request: tuxkart - Kids 3D go-kart racing game featuring Tux In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605181845.k4IIj0b0017203@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tuxkart - Kids 3D go-kart racing game featuring Tux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192119 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-05-18 14:44 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > Unfortunately tuxkart includes images that (in some cases might, in others > clearly) violate trademarks and/or copyright: > > images/adverts.rgb: SuSE, Slashdot, Philips, TuxRacer, SourceForge, VA Linux > logos, I guess "plib" could be considered safe ;-) Yes you're correct, good catch. That one needs replacing I'll whip up something new using ok to use logo's like tux and erm tux? > images/egypt.rgb: looks like scanned Egyptian drawings Dunno whats the source, but I dare sayt hat the copyright on these has expired, even with the disney copyright extension in place. > images/geeko_icon.rgb, images/players.rgb: resembles SUSE's geeko mascot, don't > know whether this is trademarked Erm, it resembles a lizzard yes, afaik having images that resemble an animal isn't illegal. > images/lunchbox.rgb: something that looks like a Barbie doll; Yes it looks like a dress up doll, there are many dress up dolls both with a thin and a thick figure as long as it doesn't say "Barbie" on it or really is a clear picture of one I think this is ok. > images/lunchbox2.rgb: a Pokemon screenshot(?!) Yes, thats a problem. I'll search for a suitable replacement. > images/mnm.rgb: a scanned M&M wrap Yes, thats a problem again. I'll search for a suitable replacement. > > this issue should be resolved IMO for instance by replacing the images > (preferrably upstream). For adverts.rgb, lunchbox2.rgb and mnm.rgb I'll search for some replacements, the other are IMHO not really an issue. I dunno if upstream is alive, but I will replace them, should I make a new source tarball or is it enough to just not put them in the RPM's (leaving them in the SRPM) ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 18 18:59:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 14:59:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 185951] Review Request: amsn : msn messenger clone In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605181859.k4IIxoVY023582@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: amsn : msn messenger clone https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=185951 ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2006-05-18 14:59 EST ------- amsn builds against local copies of libpng, libjpeg, and zlib, which is a no-no for Fedora Extras. This must be changed to build against the system copies. You don't have to remove them from the sources, just make sure it links against the existing libpng/libjpeg/zlib, and add "BuildRequires: libpng-devel libjpeg-devel zlib-devel" -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 18 19:09:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 15:09:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 185951] Review Request: amsn : msn messenger clone In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605181909.k4IJ9JqY027538@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: amsn : msn messenger clone https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=185951 ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2006-05-18 15:09 EST ------- It also includes a copy of the BWidget tcl package, which I've already packaged for FE. Just add "Requires: bwidget" and don't include the local copy. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 18 19:24:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 15:24:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192285] New: Review Request: isic -- IP Stack Integrity Checker Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192285 Summary: Review Request: isic -- IP Stack Integrity Checker Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: jwilson at redhat.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com First package by me for Extras, need a sponsor... Plenty more where this came from... :) Spec URL: http://wilsonet.com/packages/isic/isic.spec SRPM URL: http://wilsonet.com/packages/isic/isic-0.06-1.src.rpm Description: ISIC is a suite of utilities to exercise the stability of an IP Stack and its component stacks (TCP, UDP, ICMP et. al.) It generates piles of pseudo random packets of the target protocol. The packets be given tendancies to conform to. Ie 50% of the packets generated can have IP Options. 25% of the packets can be IP fragments... But the percentages are arbitrary and most of the packet fields have a configurable tendancy. The packets are then sent against the target machine to either penetrate its firewall rules or find bugs in the IP stack. ISIC also contains a utility generate raw ether frames to examine hardware implementations. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 18 19:30:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 15:30:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 185951] Review Request: amsn : msn messenger clone In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605181930.k4IJUdHS003164@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: amsn : msn messenger clone https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=185951 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-05-18 15:30 EST ------- (In reply to comment #13) > amsn builds against local copies of libpng, libjpeg, and zlib, which is a no-no > for Fedora Extras. This must be changed to build against the system copies. > You don't have to remove them from the sources, just make sure it links against > the existing libpng/libjpeg/zlib, and add "BuildRequires: libpng-devel > libjpeg-devel zlib-devel" I had a similar issue to this with gtkwave, which bundles zlib and bzip2. I made absolutely sure that the system libraries were used by not only patching the Makefiles but deleting the bundled libraries from the unpacked sources in %prep so that there was no possibility of building and linking against them. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 18 19:39:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 15:39:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192124] Review Request: exiv2: Exif and Iptc metadata manipulation library and tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605181939.k4IJdYll006288@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: exiv2: Exif and Iptc metadata manipulation library and tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192124 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-05-18 15:39 EST ------- imported, build completed for fc6/devel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 18 19:53:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 15:53:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 171993] Review Request: mpich2 - An implementation of MPI In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605181953.k4IJr9fX010699@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mpich2 - An implementation of MPI https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=171993 ------- Additional Comments From dakingun at gmail.com 2006-05-18 15:52 EST ------- Thanks for the review Orion. I've added the BRs and re-word the changelogs. The package is now properly put up for (more) review here; ftp://czar.eas.yorku.ca/pub/mpich2/mpich2-1.0.3-3.src.rpm ftp://czar.eas.yorku.ca/pub/mpich2/mpich2.spec. However it can really pass Extras' review now until some changes are made to the alternatives configuration in both openmpi and lam, to avoid conflicts. I hope to soon submit a patch to openmpi to effect such change. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 18 20:15:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 16:15:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192285] Review Request: isic -- IP Stack Integrity Checker In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605182015.k4IKFXDs017367@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: isic -- IP Stack Integrity Checker https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192285 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |wtogami at redhat.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2006-05-18 16:15 EST ------- W: isic doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/isic-0.06/wrapper.sh /bin/sh I suppose this really isn't a problem, but do you really need executable scripts in docs? Package looks good, APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 18 20:17:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 16:17:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192285] Review Request: isic -- IP Stack Integrity Checker In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605182017.k4IKHVQj017898@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: isic -- IP Stack Integrity Checker https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192285 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |wtogami at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 18 20:29:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 16:29:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192285] Review Request: isic -- IP Stack Integrity Checker In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605182029.k4IKTj5X021576@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: isic -- IP Stack Integrity Checker https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192285 ------- Additional Comments From jwilson at redhat.com 2006-05-18 16:29 EST ------- Per discussion w/warren on irc, I'll just chmod 644 wrapper.sh. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 18 20:32:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 16:32:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192257] Review Request: OpenHPI-2.4.1 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605182032.k4IKW0no022463@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: OpenHPI-2.4.1 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192257 notting at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|Package Review |openhpi AssignedTo|notting at redhat.com |pknirsch at redhat.com QAContact|extras-qa at fedoraproject.org | ------- Additional Comments From notting at redhat.com 2006-05-18 16:31 EST ------- This doesn't go through the review process as such. Bouncing to maintainer. Not sure why a major version update is needed for FC5, though. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 18 20:58:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 16:58:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191671] Review Request: serpentine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605182058.k4IKw8T1031730@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: serpentine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191671 fedora.wickert at arcor.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |fedora.wickert at arcor.de OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From fedora.wickert at arcor.de 2006-05-18 16:57 EST ------- I'm jumping in for a formal review. Stay tuned. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 18 21:06:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 17:06:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192310] New: Review Request: PySyck Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192310 Summary: Review Request: PySyck Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: mdehaan at redhat.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://michaeldehaan.net/software/RPMS/PySyck.spec SRPM URL: http://michaeldehaan.net/software/RPMS/PySyck-0.61.2-1.src.rpm Description: YAML is a data serialization format designed for human readability and interaction with scripting languages. Syck is an extension for reading and writing YAML in scripting languages. Syck provides bindings to the Python programming language, but they are somewhat limited and leak memory. PySyck is aimed to update the current Python bindings for Syck. The new bindings provide a wrapper for the Syck emitter and give access to YAML representation graphs. PySyck may be used for various tasks, in particular, as a replacement of the module pickle """ History -- syck-python in FC Extras is a package that provides syck bindings that do not have serialization support (they are broken) and there is a bugzilla on this. Previously I suggested PyYaml for inclusion as an alternate to syck-python, though PyYaml does not do Yaml 1.0. This package (PySyck) supports Yaml 1.0, which represents most of what YAML is "in the field" today. This would provide a working YAML parser/serializer for Python that also can read YAML as written by Ruby's stock modules and the C syck implementation, for instance. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 18 21:09:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 17:09:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192311] New: Review Request: cobbler Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192311 Summary: Review Request: cobbler Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: mdehaan at redhat.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://michaeldehaan.net/software/RPMS/cobbler.spec SRPM URL: http://michaeldehaan.net/software/RPMS/cobbler-0.1.0-1.src.rpm Description: Cobbler is a command line tool for simplified configuration of a provisioning server. It supports provisioning via PXE (Link), Xen (Link), and re-provisioning an existing Linux system via a method called "auto-kickstarting", made popular by Red Hat Network (Link). The last two modes require usage of a program called "koan" on the remote system. Koan stands for "kickstart-over-a-network" and allows for both network provisioning of new Xen guests and auto-kickstarting. It interacts with a centralized boot server that has been configured with cobbler. Documentation for each is contained in the manpages for the respective programs (for now). Both applications are written in Python and are released under the GPL. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 18 21:11:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 17:11:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192313] New: Review Request: koan Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192313 Summary: Review Request: koan Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: mdehaan at redhat.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://michaeldehaan.net/software/RPMS/koan.spec SRPM URL: http://michaeldehaan.net/software/RPMS/koan-0.1.0-1.src.rpm Description: Cobbler is a command line tool for simplified configuration of a provisioning server. It supports provisioning via PXE, Xen, and re-provisioning an existing Linux system via a method called "auto-kickstarting", made popular by Red Hat Network. The last two modes require usage of a program called "koan" on the remote system. Koan stands for "kickstart-over-a-network" and allows for both network provisioning of new Xen guests and auto-kickstarting. It interacts with a centralized boot server that has been configured with cobbler. Documentation for each is contained in the manpages for the respective programs (for now). Both applications are written in Python and are released under the GPL. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 18 21:14:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 17:14:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192311] Review Request: cobbler In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605182114.k4ILEaQZ004223@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cobbler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192311 ------- Additional Comments From mdehaan at redhat.com 2006-05-18 17:14 EST ------- This is associated with a program submitted here, but for just using PXE, the "koan" program is not required. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192313 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 18 21:51:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 17:51:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191624] Review Request: perl-Test-Expect - Automated driving and testing of terminal-based programs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605182151.k4ILpxAd013136@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-Expect - Automated driving and testing of terminal-based programs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191624 jpo at di.uminho.pt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From jpo at di.uminho.pt 2006-05-18 17:51 EST ------- Thanks for the review. Imported and built for FC-5 and devel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 18 21:54:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 17:54:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191628] Review Request: perl-Net-SNMP - Object oriented interface to SNMP In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605182154.k4ILs0Vj013498@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-SNMP - Object oriented interface to SNMP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191628 jpo at di.uminho.pt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From jpo at di.uminho.pt 2006-05-18 17:53 EST ------- Thanks for the review. Imported and built for FC-4, FC-5, and devel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 18 21:59:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 17:59:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 176374] Review Request: nagios-plugins In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605182159.k4ILxSYp014687@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nagios-plugins https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176374 ------- Additional Comments From jpo at di.uminho.pt 2006-05-18 17:59 EST ------- Mike, perl-Net-SNMP has been built for FC-4, FC-5, and devel. The devel RPMs have already been pushed into the mirrors. The FC-4 and FC-5 will take a little a bit longer (next push). jpo -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 18 21:47:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 17:47:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191239] Review Request: qjackctl - Qt based JACK control application In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605182147.k4ILluoC012067@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qjackctl - Qt based JACK control application https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191239 ------- Additional Comments From nando at ccrma.stanford.edu 2006-05-18 17:47 EST ------- (In reply to comment #11) > NEEDSWORK: > > Source: seems to need to be http://dl.sf.net/sourceforge/qjackctl/[...] > otherwise I get a 404 as is. Fixed. > The Requires: jack-audio-connection-kit >= 0.80.0 is unnecessary as no such old > version is going to be in Extras. Fixed (comment: Extras does not live in a vaccum, the requires line would have addressed Planet CCRMA users that have old versions and migrate to the extras package - I know, very unlikely, but if experience is any guide if it can happen it will). > The generic INSTALL instructions should not be packaged. > > The desktop file should be included as Source:, not embedded in the spec, as > shown in the Desktop Files section of the packaging guidelines. Fixed. Spec URL: http://ccrma.stanford.edu/planetccrma/extras/qjackctl.spec SRPM URL: http://ccrma.stanford.edu/planetccrma/extras/qjackctl-0.2.20-4.0.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 18 22:16:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 18:16:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 176374] Review Request: nagios-plugins In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605182216.k4IMGgiD018279@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nagios-plugins https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176374 ------- Additional Comments From imlinux at gmail.com 2006-05-18 18:16 EST ------- Next time you're in the Chicagoland area lemme know, I owe you a beer. I'm chomping through some of these changes and testing. I'll post what I've got by tomorow night. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 18 23:29:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 19:29:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 183912] Review Request: jack-audio-connection-kit - The Jack Audio Connection Kit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605182329.k4INTOMF032076@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jack-audio-connection-kit - The Jack Audio Connection Kit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183912 ------- Additional Comments From seg at haxxed.com 2006-05-18 19:29 EST ------- Really my beef here is with inconsistency. You *are* already specifying the include dir in the devel package as simply "%{_includedir}/jack", I would prefer if you specified the lib dir in the main package the same way. And putting trailing slashes on the directories is nicer for Q/A, otherwise you can't really tell for sure from the SPEC alone that its supposed to be a directory. But I think we're mostly just nitpicking at this point. :) Everything else looks good to me. Someone please approve/sponsor, many things depend on jack... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 19 00:00:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 20:00:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 168719] Review Request: gdal In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605190000.k4J000PF006499@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gdal https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=168719 ------- Additional Comments From che666 at gmail.com 2006-05-18 19:59 EST ------- if anyone is interested i got a patch around that makes dynamically building vs hdf4 possible. just lemme know. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 19 01:27:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 21:27:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 184000] Review Request: emacs-vm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605190127.k4J1RKBW023285@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: emacs-vm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=184000 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-05-18 21:27 EST ------- If you could update the package to reflect the new 'emacs-common-$name' I can see about doing a review. (removing FE-NEEDSPONSOR as you are now sponsored). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 19 01:59:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 21:59:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190027] Review Request: hexter-dssi - DSSI software synthesizer plugin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605190159.k4J1xILa030822@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hexter-dssi - DSSI software synthesizer plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190027 ------- Additional Comments From green at redhat.com 2006-05-18 21:59 EST ------- Thanks for the comments. Updated bits here: Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/green/FE/FC5/hexter-dssi.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/green/FE/FC5/hexter-dssi-0.5.9-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 19 02:04:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 22:04:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192363] New: Review Request: GTS - Gnu Triangulated Surface Library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192363 Summary: Review Request: GTS - Gnu Triangulated Surface Library Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: ed at eh3.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://mitgcm.org/eh3/fedora_misc/gts.spec SRPM URL: http://mitgcm.org/eh3/fedora_misc/gts-0.7.6-1.src.rpm Description: GTS provides a set of useful functions to deal with 3D surfaces meshed with interconnected triangles including collision detection, multiresolution models, constrained Delaunay triangulations and robust set operations (union, intersection, differences). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 19 02:14:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 22:14:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189892] Review Request: dssi - Disposable Soft Synth Interface In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605190214.k4J2EG4V001494@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dssi - Disposable Soft Synth Interface https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189892 ------- Additional Comments From green at redhat.com 2006-05-18 22:14 EST ------- Thanks. Updated bits here.... Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/green/FE/FC5/dssi.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/green/FE/FC5/dssi-0.9.1-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 19 02:21:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 22:21:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190029] Review Request: whysynth-dssi - DSSI software synthesizer plugin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605190221.k4J2Lf59003335@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: whysynth-dssi - DSSI software synthesizer plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190029 ------- Additional Comments From green at redhat.com 2006-05-18 22:21 EST ------- Updated bits here: Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/green/FE/FC5/whysynth-dssi.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/green/FE/FC5/whysynth-dssi-20060122-2.src.rpm These updates were based on the hexter-dssi package feedback. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 19 02:43:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 22:43:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189889] Review Request: vkeybd - Virtual MIDI Keyboard In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605190243.k4J2h1ca008859@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vkeybd - Virtual MIDI Keyboard https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189889 ------- Additional Comments From green at redhat.com 2006-05-18 22:42 EST ------- Added nando's vkeybd icon. Minor cleanups. Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/green/FE/FC5/vkeybd.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/green/FE/FC5/vkeybd-0.1.17-4.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 19 03:30:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 23:30:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190997] Review Request: linux-wlan-ng In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605190330.k4J3UEng020279@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: linux-wlan-ng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190997 ------- Additional Comments From redhat at flyn.org 2006-05-18 23:30 EST ------- Where does one get the current kmodtool? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 19 03:42:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 23:42:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192363] Review Request: GTS - Gnu Triangulated Surface Library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605190342.k4J3gjIi023839@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: GTS - Gnu Triangulated Surface Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192363 rc040203 at freenet.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |rc040203 at freenet.de OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2006-05-18 23:42 EST ------- I've been packaging gts for many years, so ... NEEDSWORK: - Shipping static libs Add --disable-static to %configure - Bogus "Provides: gts-devel" at the beginning of the spec. - Some of the binaries' names are too general and likely to conflict with other packages: /usr/bin/delaunay /usr/bin/happrox /usr/bin/transform I propose to rename them into gts - Mispackaged file: /usr/share/gts/gts.m4 This file is an autoconf support macro and belongs into /usr/share/aclocal - The html docs contained in gts-*.rpm are devel docs. They should be packaged into the gts-devel-*.rpm. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 19 04:20:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 00:20:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191549] Review Request: hping3 - TCP/IP stack auditing and much more In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605190420.k4J4K9Xb031835@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hping3 - TCP/IP stack auditing and much more https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191549 ------- Additional Comments From paul at xtdnet.nl 2006-05-19 00:20 EST ------- Fixed in: Spec URL: ftp://ftp.xelerance.com/hping3/hping3.spec SRPM URL: ftp://ftp.xelerance.com/hping3/hping3-0.0.20051105-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 19 04:23:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 00:23:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 179040] Review Request: socat In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605190423.k4J4NHEw032324@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: socat https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=179040 ------- Additional Comments From paul at xtdnet.nl 2006-05-19 00:23 EST ------- upstream will add configure.in/ac in his next release. I am still investigating why mock builds fail, but my FC4 x86_64 builds fine. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 19 04:29:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 00:29:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191603] Review Request: rsnapshot -- rsync-based filesystem snapshots In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605190429.k4J4T3bS000799@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rsnapshot -- rsync-based filesystem snapshots https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191603 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-05-19 00:28 EST ------- I got delayed a bit, but here you go: The only questions I have relate to the %post script. Are there any other possible versions other than "unknown" and 1.2? The comment indicates that the "latest version is 1.2" which seems to allow for earlier versions. If there are, things seem to be busted. * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible; license text is included in the package. * source files match upstream: b27d90886b25d0e160b267f98c605aec rsnapshot-1.2.3.tar.gz b27d90886b25d0e160b267f98c605aec rsnapshot-1.2.3.tar.gz-srpm * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * package builds in mock (FC5, x86_64). * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane. * no shared libraries are present. * package is not relocatable. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * %clean is present. O %check is not present; no test suite upstream. ? scriptlets are present. They seem sane to me, but see questions above. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no libtool .la droppings. * not a GUI app. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 19 04:57:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 00:57:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191603] Review Request: rsnapshot -- rsync-based filesystem snapshots In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605190457.k4J4vpnt006502@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rsnapshot -- rsync-based filesystem snapshots https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191603 ------- Additional Comments From lists at forevermore.net 2006-05-19 00:57 EST ------- I honestly don't know about the version thing. The script originally came from upstream, was modified by Dag and then by myself to be a little clener. My guess is that there was the "old" format (aka "unknown"), and then the 1.2 format. If it's a serious concern, I can verify with the current project maintainer -- just let me know. I personally haven't seen anything other than 1.2, which has been around for a long time. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 19 05:33:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 01:33:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190997] Review Request: linux-wlan-ng In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605190533.k4J5XSMJ012151@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: linux-wlan-ng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190997 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2006-05-19 01:33 EST ------- devel branch of thinkpad-kmod or lirc-kmod in CVS. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 19 05:58:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 01:58:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192119] Review Request: tuxkart - Kids 3D go-kart racing game featuring Tux In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605190558.k4J5wgoW016319@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tuxkart - Kids 3D go-kart racing game featuring Tux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192119 ------- Additional Comments From nphilipp at redhat.com 2006-05-19 01:58 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > (In reply to comment #3) > > images/adverts.rgb: SuSE, Slashdot, Philips, TuxRacer, SourceForge, VA Linux > > logos, I guess "plib" could be considered safe ;-) > Yes you're correct, good catch. That one needs replacing I'll whip up something > new using ok to use logo's like tux and erm tux? Sure ;-). Perhaps just some stylised generic pictures like e.g. a shampoo bottle, a house, ... could be used. > > > images/egypt.rgb: looks like scanned Egyptian drawings > > Dunno whats the source, but I dare sayt hat the copyright on these has expired, > even with the disney copyright extension in place. Well if they're originally Egyptian from ancient times, then yes. If they're something that someone just styled that way, probably not... Point is we can't know it so I'd better play safe. > > images/geeko_icon.rgb, images/players.rgb: resembles SUSE's geeko mascot, don't > > know whether this is trademarked > > Erm, it resembles a lizzard yes, afaik having images that resemble an animal > isn't illegal. Calling them "Geeko" maybe is (I don't know whether SUSE trademarked it and how their trademark rules are). > > images/lunchbox.rgb: something that looks like a Barbie doll; > Yes it looks like a dress up doll, there are many dress up dolls both with a > thin and a thick figure as long as it doesn't say "Barbie" on it or really is a > clear picture of one I think this is ok. I thiught "copyright" as well, it looks like a scan of such a doll's box and usualy that stuff is plastered with copyright notices (although I don't see any copyrightable value in them others might differ). > I dunno if upstream is alive, but I will replace them, should I make a new > source tarball or is it enough to just not put them in the RPM's (leaving them > in the SRPM) ? I don't know, perhaps someone else has an idea. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 19 06:54:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 02:54:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188477] Review Request: maildrop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605190654.k4J6stK5026381@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: maildrop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188477 ------- Additional Comments From johan-fedora at deds.nl 2006-05-19 02:54 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > AFAICT, courier-authlib is an optional part. Does anyone object to omitting > it? I'm currently using maildrop with courier-authlib. When a new version of maildrop (of courier-authlib) is released I manualy build and upgrade the RPMS. I would appreciate support for courier-authlib in this maildrop package. As far as i know courier-authlib is not yet in FE or under review. Can I do anything to help with that? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 19 07:43:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 03:43:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 173459] Review Request: initng In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605190743.k4J7hfrD004626@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 daner964 at student.liu.se changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #128936|0 |1 is obsolete| | ------- Additional Comments From daner964 at student.liu.se 2006-05-19 03:43 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=129586) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=129586&action=view) initng 0.6.7-1 spec file Biggest change is that selinux now compiles and actually seems to work! A minor drawback in this release is that it seems to require c++ devel files to build (because of a glitch in the makesystem that's already fixed in svn). Should I add a temporary build requirement in the spec file for this? Is there any opinions about how stable initng is now? Any major stuff that needs fixing? Are we getting ready for a full review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 19 07:52:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 03:52:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 173459] Review Request: initng In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605190752.k4J7qNVi007076@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 ------- Additional Comments From michel.vandenbergh at uhasselt.be 2006-05-19 03:52 EST ------- Something I find really ugly is that initng switches to cyrillic for a while during boot. It would be nice if this were fixed! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 19 07:56:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 03:56:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 184331] Review Request: K-3D - 3D modeling and rendering system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605190756.k4J7urmN008218@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: K-3D - 3D modeling and rendering system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=184331 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|fedora-extras- |fedora-package- |list at redhat.com |review at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From gemi at bluewin.ch 2006-05-19 03:56 EST ------- * Could you update to 0.5.10.0? * gts can be used, but is not yet in Extras I suggest you submit gts for review and make it a dependency for k-3d The review process of this package will be quick, I think. * There is also a dependency on SuperLU, I don't know how crucial it is. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 19 08:00:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 04:00:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 173459] Review Request: initng In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605190800.k4J80lPi009192@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 ------- Additional Comments From che666 at gmail.com 2006-05-19 04:00 EST ------- #276 1. speedstep script causes an oops on shutdown 2. iptables script is suboptimal 3. iptables seems not to be started with default generated runlevels 4. #277 yeah i reported that already. its a fact that fedora seems to need a special presetup for the gettys according ot the infos i collected from the initng mailinglist. 5. chicken egg dep problem will be problematic for doing clean mock builds of both packages (main/ifiles) for future relaeses i will help testing initng before baselines/releasetags are made. yet we all seem to have been running after it... we gotta run ahead :o) personally i think with the above issues fixed its ready for release -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 19 08:20:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 04:20:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 184331] Review Request: K-3D - 3D modeling and rendering system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605190820.k4J8KvZF014845@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: K-3D - 3D modeling and rendering system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=184331 ------- Additional Comments From dan at danny.cz 2006-05-19 04:20 EST ------- gts was just submited a few hours ago as https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192363 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 19 08:37:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 04:37:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 183912] Review Request: jack-audio-connection-kit - The Jack Audio Connection Kit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605190837.k4J8bOIp019377@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jack-audio-connection-kit - The Jack Audio Connection Kit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183912 andy at smile.org.ua changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|Package Review |aalib ------- Additional Comments From andy at smile.org.ua 2006-05-19 04:37 EST ------- I think the Package Guidelines should be included this interesting moment. Anyway, I uniform directories items in the spec. Updated version here: ftp://andriy.asplinux.com.ua/pub/people/andy/extras/jack-audio-connection-kit-0. 101.1-8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 19 08:40:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 04:40:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 183912] Review Request: jack-audio-connection-kit - The Jack Audio Connection Kit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605190840.k4J8eN5F020282@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jack-audio-connection-kit - The Jack Audio Connection Kit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183912 andy at smile.org.ua changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|aalib |Package Review -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 19 09:48:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 05:48:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191239] Review Request: qjackctl - Qt based JACK control application In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605190948.k4J9mr5t003899@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qjackctl - Qt based JACK control application https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191239 ------- Additional Comments From seg at haxxed.com 2006-05-19 05:48 EST ------- Looks good. I can't give final approval, but this is approve-able in my opinion. Someone please sponsor Fernando, we need him. :) And for what its worth, I queried FESCo on the make/rm macro thing. The response was "choose either, just be consistent". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 19 09:58:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 05:58:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 173459] Review Request: initng In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605190958.k4J9wLxD006622@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 ------- Additional Comments From daner964 at student.liu.se 2006-05-19 05:58 EST ------- (In reply to comment #278) > #276 > 1. speedstep script causes an oops on shutdown Anyone got any ideas? > 2. iptables script is suboptimal Hmmm... I can see what you mean. Anyone here that has the knowledge and time to look at it? > 3. iptables seems not to be started with default generated runlevels Oops. A quick look at gen_system_runlevel showed that it was a complete mess, I guess it hasn't worked for a while. Fixed it up in svn. Gen_system_runlevel mainly is a big cludge that everyone has agreed should be replaced. Question is with what... > 4. #277 yeah i reported that already. its a fact that fedora seems to need a > special presetup for the gettys according ot the infos i collected from the > initng mailinglist. So what _is_ the problem with Fedora? What's the difference from everybody else? > 5. chicken egg dep problem will be problematic for doing clean mock builds of > both packages (main/ifiles) Anyone got any ideas on this? I'm quite sure initng can't be completely alone about this kind of problem, how do other packages solve it? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 19 10:40:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 06:40:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 173459] Review Request: initng In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605191040.k4JAeHmt018224@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 ------- Additional Comments From che666 at gmail.com 2006-05-19 06:40 EST ------- #279 1. i am going to fix that (compare sysvinit script) unless someone else is faster 2. i am going to fix that (compare sysvinit script) unless someone else is faster 3. great 4. the full explanation is somewhere on the initng mailinglist. somewhere in the 2005 archives if i am not too wrong. 5. thats something that just shouldnt happen. other packages afaik dont have that problem after beeing properly fixed. not splitting it would prevent it from throwing up. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 19 11:07:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 07:07:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 173459] Review Request: initng In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605191107.k4JB7wAP026822@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 ------- Additional Comments From che666 at gmail.com 2006-05-19 07:07 EST ------- another issue: suspend / resume doesent work in fc5 with initng should be looked into with all the issues mentioned today fixed i see it ready to go into extras (my personal view) as for the chicken egg problem... not having initng depend on the ifiles would make it build in mock. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 19 11:16:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 07:16:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188180] Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605191116.k4JBG5O0029071@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188180 ------- Additional Comments From laurent.rineau__fc_extra at normalesup.org 2006-05-19 07:15 EST ------- I think sub-packages should own the directories in which they install files. I tried install then remove all qt4 package (a qt4-4.1.2-20.spec of my own), and some directories remain: /usr/lib64/qt4 /usr/lib64/qt4/bin /usr/lib64/qt4/lib64 /usr/lib64/qt4/plugins -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 19 11:50:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 07:50:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188477] Review Request: maildrop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605191150.k4JBom1U005655@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: maildrop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188477 ------- Additional Comments From ndbecker2 at verizon.net 2006-05-19 07:50 EST ------- Does it make sense to package courier-authlib separately, or is it only a compile-time option? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 19 11:59:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 07:59:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192363] Review Request: GTS - Gnu Triangulated Surface Library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605191159.k4JBxhb4007611@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: GTS - Gnu Triangulated Surface Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192363 ------- Additional Comments From ed at eh3.com 2006-05-19 07:59 EST ------- Hi Ralf, thank you for all the helpful comments! Here are the updated files that incorporate all of your fixes: http://mitgcm.org/eh3/fedora_misc/gts-0.7.6-2.src.rpm http://mitgcm.org/eh3/fedora_misc/gts.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 19 12:23:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 08:23:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188180] Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605191223.k4JCNi2E012116@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188180 ------- Additional Comments From laurent.rineau__fc_extra at normalesup.org 2006-05-19 08:23 EST ------- Other problems: -?On my builds, -L%{_builddir}/qt-x11-opensource-src-%{version}/lib is still in some pkgconfig file. Maybe use "sed -e 's|...||g'" instead of "sed -e 's|...||'" -?%{qtdir}/doc does not link to the right directory. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 19 12:29:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 08:29:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 173459] Review Request: initng In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605191229.k4JCTN5V013048@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 ------- Additional Comments From che666 at gmail.com 2006-05-19 08:29 EST ------- hah... just figured out that swap is noted used ... swapon isnt really executed and/or working at boottime. has to be investigated. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 19 12:37:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 08:37:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191671] Review Request: serpentine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605191237.k4JCbRro015327@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: serpentine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191671 ------- Additional Comments From fedora.wickert at arcor.de 2006-05-19 08:37 EST ------- Is there a particular reason not to use serpentine-0.6.91? http://developer.berlios.de/project/shownotes.php?group_id=3081&release_id=9269 0.6.91 introduces support for gstreamer-1.0 and fixes the issuse with the russian desktop.file and translations. Unfortunately German translations were dropped :(, maybe I'm going to update them. Attaching a patch. This patch also fixes the following issues: - own /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/serpentine and /usr/share/serpentine (comment #1) - drop python-abi Requires: (comment # 4) - drop serpentine-0.6.4-desktop.patch and use sed instead - description now ends with a dot: "...simplicity, usability and compatibility." BTW: IMHO description could be a little mor elaborate, something like: "Serpentine is an application for writing CD-Audio discs. It aims for simplicity, usability and compatibility and accepts a big range of audio (and video) formats thanks to the excelent GStreamer framework. It also tries to integrate well with other applications, accepting full Drag N Drop from applications like Nautilus, Rhythmbox and even Firefox." (parts taken from http://gnomefiles.org/app.php?soft_id=907) - require gstreamer-python instead of gstreamer08-python - remove-category X-Ximian-Main from fedora-serpentine.desktop A minor note: Calling update-desktop-database in post and postun was not necessary, because the desktop entry did not contain a mime type. 0.6.91 has a mime type, so we do need it now. Take what you need from my patch and update your package please. I'm going do do a complete review then. From what I've seen everything looks fine, package builds in mock and works well. I've successfully burned a couple of audio discs, in fact I'm using serpentine for a long time and rolled my own package. Nice to see somebody is willing to maintain it for extras. :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 19 12:40:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 08:40:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191671] Review Request: serpentine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605191240.k4JCeGvY015893@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: serpentine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191671 ------- Additional Comments From fedora.wickert at arcor.de 2006-05-19 08:40 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=129598) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=129598&action=view) Patch for serpentine.spec diff -u serpentine-0.6.4.spec serpentine.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 19 12:42:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 08:42:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190071] Review Request: tetex-dvipost - latex post filter command In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605191242.k4JCgl3C016690@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tetex-dvipost - latex post filter command https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190071 jamatos at fc.up.pt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: dvipost - |Review Request: tetex- |latex post filter command |dvipost - latex post filter | |command ------- Additional Comments From jamatos at fc.up.pt 2006-05-19 08:42 EST ------- (In reply to comment #19) > Upstream should probably be bugged about that. If I was building it from source, > I would want it in TEXMFLOCAL (or in my home dir texmf) - so it should be a > configure switch (and probably should default to TEXMFLOCAL if no arguement is > given to configure) I agree with your analysis, Michael. This goes to my todo list with low priority though. :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 19 12:43:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 08:43:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192363] Review Request: GTS - Gnu Triangulated Surface Library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605191243.k4JCh7Wf016777@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: GTS - Gnu Triangulated Surface Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192363 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2006-05-19 08:42 EST ------- OK, now to the nasty parts (Gts's sources are quite dirty ;) ): 1. gts-config is buggy: Compare this (buggy): $ ./gts-config --cflags -I/usr/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/lib/glib-2.0/include -I/usr/include $ ./gts-config --libs -L/usr/lib -lgts -lglib-2.0 -lm to this: $ pkg-config --cflags gts -pthread -I/usr/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/lib/glib-2.0/include $ pkg-config --libs gts -pthread -Wl,--export-dynamic -lgts -lgthread-2.0 -lgmodule-2.0 -ldl -lglib-2.0 I'd propose to patch gts-config to behave as a wrapper to the corresponding calls to pkg-config, at least for --cflags and --libs, or to patch out the -I/usr/include rsp. -L/usr/lib by brute force. 2. The package's Makefiles are broken. They explictily pass -I$(includedir) through INCLUDES. This overrides the system include path and can cause nasty side-effects. 3. Building the packages causes GCC to emit quite a significant number of "punned pointer/strict-alignment warnings". These are likely to break the package at run-time, esp. on 64bit platforms. Also worth noting is the configure script playing tricks with CFLAGS. AFAIS, they seem to be harmless at least on FC5/i386. So, be prepared to watch PRs coming in ;) I consider 1. to be a MUST-fix, 2. to be a "I recommend to fix it" and 3. headsup. APPROVED, provided you fix 1. I am going to attach a patch to address issue 2. to this PR. [Besides this, this package is one of those packages applying the weird (IMO sense-free) Drepper-style shared library names. As this package is an ordinary library, I am not going to fret over this, this time.] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 19 12:45:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 08:45:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192363] Review Request: GTS - Gnu Triangulated Surface Library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605191245.k4JCjOBj017214@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: GTS - Gnu Triangulated Surface Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192363 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2006-05-19 08:45 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=129599) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=129599&action=view) patch to address Makefile.am applying bogus INCLUDES -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 19 12:46:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 08:46:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191671] Review Request: serpentine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605191246.k4JCkgVC017597@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: serpentine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191671 ------- Additional Comments From fedora.wickert at arcor.de 2006-05-19 08:46 EST ------- (In reply to comment #7) Sorry, I just realized there'S a typo in my patch: "--remove-cetagory" needs to be "--remove-category" -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 19 12:46:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 08:46:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192363] Review Request: GTS - Gnu Triangulated Surface Library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605191246.k4JCkaVI017566@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: GTS - Gnu Triangulated Surface Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192363 rc040203 at freenet.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 19 12:48:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 08:48:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 173459] Review Request: initng In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605191248.k4JCmA9Y017936@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 ------- Additional Comments From daner964 at student.liu.se 2006-05-19 08:47 EST ------- (In reply to comment #280) > 4. the full explanation is somewhere on the initng mailinglist. somewhere in > the 2005 archives if i am not too wrong. After a whole lot of searching in the archive I give up. The only mails I find regarding the issue are the ones where I try to solve it :-/ Back in november I was trying to make a plugin for it. What I still can't figure out is why Fedora is having these troubles when other distro's just work right out of the box. Something with utf stuff set up in the kernel? (In reply to comment #281) > suspend / resume doesent work in fc5 with initng > should be looked into Do you file it upstreams? I have no idea if this work with other distros... > as for the chicken egg problem... not having initng depend on the ifiles would > make it build in mock. Yep. And it would also mean that a whole lot of people would just do a "yum install initng", reboot and then blame us when it doesn't work. Initng needs the ifiles to do any good. But do initng-devel really need initng? Or is it just common practice that foo-devel depends on foo? I noticed btw that initscripts depends on SysVinit but not the other way around. Seems strange to me... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 19 12:58:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 08:58:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 173459] Review Request: initng In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605191258.k4JCwnhJ020012@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 ------- Additional Comments From daner964 at student.liu.se 2006-05-19 08:58 EST ------- (In reply to comment #282) > hah... just figured out that swap is noted used ... > swapon isnt really executed and/or working at boottime. has to be investigated. Looked into it, turned out system/swap wasn't added to default runlevel. Fixed in svn. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 19 13:03:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 09:03:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 173459] Review Request: initng In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605191303.k4JD30EK020763@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 ------- Additional Comments From che666 at gmail.com 2006-05-19 09:02 EST ------- #283 well thats what i meant i think... if the comments from around nov 2005 are from you then sorry for misreferencing you. for suspend resume i am going to file it upstream once i figure out more why it barfs... anyone is invited to help me though. swsusp2 works if i swapon manually. maybe the whole not swap mounting issue hsa to do with the facts that i use LABEL for the swap partition. to be investigated. i will also discuss the issue with upstream... i am quite often on freenode #initng with nick "che" inconvenience vs not beeing able to build it for extras at all. you pick ;) i agree that it would be nicer if ifiles would be installed automatically if initng is pulled but currently that just cant happen. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 19 13:37:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 09:37:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 173459] Review Request: initng In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605191337.k4JDbl2f029185@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 ------- Additional Comments From che666 at gmail.com 2006-05-19 09:37 EST ------- just found more out regarding the "cyrillic letters" issue... actually it doesent happen for me if i use vgs kernel boot param e.g. vga=792 for 1024x768 (on my thinkpad i use 834 for 1400x1050) maybe that is yet undiscovered useful input to go for that problem -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 19 13:48:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 09:48:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 181450] Review Request: clamav-exim - Clam AV support files for Exim In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605191348.k4JDmIah031905@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clamav-exim - Clam AV support files for Exim https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=181450 rpm at timj.co.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |190492 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 19 13:53:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 09:53:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188180] Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605191353.k4JDrekO000751@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188180 ------- Additional Comments From laurent.rineau__fc_extra at normalesup.org 2006-05-19 09:53 EST ------- My ow http://www.di.ens.fr/~rineau/Fedora/qt4-4.1.2-20rineau.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 19 13:54:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 09:54:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 173459] Review Request: initng In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605191354.k4JDsrFf001019@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 ------- Additional Comments From michel.vandenbergh at uhasselt.be 2006-05-19 09:54 EST ------- Very nice work around indeed. Maybe other distros include a vga= parameter by default? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 19 13:59:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 09:59:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191671] Review Request: serpentine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605191359.k4JDxHYR002329@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: serpentine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191671 ------- Additional Comments From foolish at guezz.net 2006-05-19 09:59 EST ------- Updated spec: http://folk.ntnu.no/sindrb/packages/serpentine.spec Updated SRPM: http://folk.ntnu.no/sindrb/packages/serpentine-0.6.91-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 19 14:00:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 10:00:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188180] Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605191400.k4JE04wR002451@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188180 ------- Additional Comments From laurent.rineau__fc_extra at normalesup.org 2006-05-19 09:59 EST ------- (sorry for comment #98, ignore it) My own spec file: http://www.di.ens.fr/~rineau/Fedora/qt4-4.1.2-20rineau.spec Its fixes comment #97, and several x86_64 spec bugs. However, some directories are not properly owned, yet: the one I pointed out in comment #96, and of %{_datadir}/qt4 and %{_datadir}/qt4/doc -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 19 14:02:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 10:02:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188180] Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605191402.k4JE2Cho002968@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188180 ------- Additional Comments From frank-buettner at gmx.net 2006-05-19 10:02 EST ------- Now 4.1.3 is out. ftp://ftp.trolltech.com/qt/source -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 19 14:02:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 10:02:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191603] Review Request: rsnapshot -- rsync-based filesystem snapshots In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605191402.k4JE2kqB003153@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rsnapshot -- rsync-based filesystem snapshots https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191603 ------- Additional Comments From bugs.michael at gmx.net 2006-05-19 10:02 EST ------- rsnapshot is in Fedora Extras already. Check owners.list before reviewing. If binaries are missing, bug the owner. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 19 14:15:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 10:15:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191603] Review Request: rsnapshot -- rsync-based filesystem snapshots In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605191415.k4JEFnCw005972@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rsnapshot -- rsync-based filesystem snapshots https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191603 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-05-19 10:15 EST ------- rsnapshot was checked into owners-list basically when that file was first imported into CVS (11-Jul-05). It has never been built for any distro that I can see. I assumed it was just an artifact, but it was imported into CVS on 12-Apr-2005 and has not changed since. I don't think this package is "really" in extras. It seems to be left over from some initial mass import. Chris, could you ping ghenry at suretecsystems.com and see about taking over this package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 19 14:38:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 10:38:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188180] Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605191438.k4JEc5Z4011925@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188180 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-05-19 10:37 EST ------- Spec Name or Url: http://kde-redhat.unl.edu/apt/kde-redhat/SPECS/qt4-4.1.2-20.spec SRPM Name or Url: http://kde-redhat.unl.edu/apt/kde-redhat/all/SRPMS.stable/qt4-4.1.2-20.src.rpm %changelog * Fri May 19 2006 Rex Dieter 4.1.2-20 - fix some unowned dirs - try harder to purge %%builddir from .pc,.prl files - -docdir %%_docdir/%%name-doc-%%version, since we use %%doc macro in main pkg - -doc: own %%qt_docdir - use qt4-wrapper.sh to ensure launch of qt4 versions of apps that (may) overlap with those from qt3 - use %%qtdir/%%_lib in ld.so.conf.d/*.conf files too -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 19 14:38:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 10:38:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187282] Review Request: sax2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605191438.k4JEcQAD012097@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sax2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187282 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|fedora-extras- |fedora-package- |list at redhat.com |review at redhat.com opensource at till.name changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |opensource at till.name ------- Additional Comments From opensource at till.name 2006-05-19 10:38 EST ------- It does not compile in mock, from build.log: In file included from spp.cpp:16: spp.h:19:30: error: readline/history.h: No such file or directory spp.cpp: In constructor 'SPPParse::SPPParse()': spp.cpp:27: error: 'using_history' was not declared in this scope make[2]: *** [spp.o] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/sax/spp' make[1]: *** [all] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/sax/spp' make: *** [all] Error 2 error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.78460 (%build) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 19 14:56:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 10:56:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188180] Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605191456.k4JEu1cI016721@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188180 ------- Additional Comments From laurent.rineau__fc_extra at normalesup.org 2006-05-19 10:55 EST ------- (In reply to comment #101) > http://kde-redhat.unl.edu/apt/kde-redhat/SPECS/qt4-4.1.2-20.spec * -libdir %{qtdir}/%{_lib} but after that the symlink lib->%{_lib} is missing, if %{_lib}!="lib". It makes the build fail in %install. * -docdir %{qt_docdir}/ => extra "/" -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 19 15:06:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 11:06:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188180] Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605191506.k4JF69j0019262@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188180 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-05-19 11:06 EST ------- Re: comment #102 > but after that the symlink lib->%{_lib} is missing So? I see no problem. > It makes the build fail in %install. It built fine for me in mock. ?? > * -docdir %{qt_docdir}/ > => extra "/" Again, so? Problem being? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 19 15:13:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 11:13:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188180] Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605191513.k4JFDAAq021227@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188180 ------- Additional Comments From laurent.rineau__fc_extra at normalesup.org 2006-05-19 11:13 EST ------- (In reply to comment #103) > Re: comment #102 > > but after that the symlink lib->%{_lib} is missing > So? I see no problem. > > It makes the build fail in %install. > It built fine for me in mock. ?? Even if %{_lib}=="lib64"? For example, the following will fail to find any pkgconfig file: for i in ../%{qt_dirname}/lib/*.pc ; do [ -f "$i" ] && ln -s $i . done Because ../%{qt_dirname}/lib/ does not exist (whereas ../%{qt_dirname}/lib64 does). > > * -docdir %{qt_docdir}/ > > => extra "/" > > Again, so? Problem being? The build shows some "//" but it may not be important. I do not know. From the beginning I make verbose reports of what I see. Maybe I should calm down. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 19 15:23:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 11:23:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192363] Review Request: GTS - Gnu Triangulated Surface Library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605191523.k4JFNTk6023384@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: GTS - Gnu Triangulated Surface Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192363 ------- Additional Comments From ed at eh3.com 2006-05-19 11:23 EST ------- Hi Ralf, thank you again for all the help. I'm new (*very* new) to gts and am hoping to learn about it and use it for some future projects. You are obviously a lot more familiar with it. Would you be interested in "owning" it in Extras? I'd be glad to do that and would be equally happy to try and maintain it myself. Either way is cool, I'd just like to have a usable version of it in Extras. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 19 15:28:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 11:28:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192413] New: libdhcp : IPv6 and IPv4 DHCP client and network configuration library API Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192413 Summary: libdhcp : IPv6 and IPv4 DHCP client and network configuration library API Product: Fedora Core Version: devel Platform: All URL: http://people.redhat.com/~jvdias/libdhcp OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: notting at redhat.com ReportedBy: jvdias at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: dcantrel at redhat.com,fedora-package- review at redhat.com,katzj at redhat.com,nalin at redhat.com,pnas rat at redhat.com Description of problem: anaconda and potentially other users need a library based implementation of DHCP clients for IPv6 and IPv4, and a library to configure the network from a static configuration, similar to the facilities currently provided by pump, but hopefully much improved and newly IPv6 capable (bug 186322). At the request of the anaconda team, I have developed such a library: libdhcp. The .spec file and srpm can be downloaded from: http://people.redhat.com/~jvdias/libdhcp and the source is also checked into elvis as 'libdhcp'. libdhcp requires only the 'libdhcp6client-' sub-package of dhcpv6, and the 'libdhcp4client' subpackage of dhcp. These are MINIMALLY modified versions of the upstream dhcp clients, with header files. No dhcp client executable is changed in any way. The client libraries's main() functions are changed to be named 'dhcpv[46]_client' and to accept a LIBDHCP_Control * argument, all their dynamic memory is automatically freed on return from these functions, and all static / global variables are re-initialized; they've also been changed to invoke the libdhcp callbacks for state changes and error logging, and any use of the exit() syscall has been removed. See the libdhcp source README file for details on the libdhcp API. libdhcp is now useable, but is currently being improved to provide: o an API 100% compatible with pump, (pump.h and all it defines that is used by anaconda - should be complete today). o both clients running in separate threads (this currently works under GDB only). Only necessary if a timeout parameter of 0 is supplied, ie you want the client to wait indefinitely for either IPv6 or IPv4 server contact. o better memory cleanup. While valgrind reports no errors from libdhcp, libdhcp4client, or libdhcp6client code under operation modes tested so far, there certainly are memory leaks - these will be resolved shortly (ie. today). Coming shortly (within next week): o better Doxygen documentation o a libdhcp++ C++ class interface to the library o PERL and Python module interfaces to the library -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 19 15:29:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 11:29:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 186322] add support for IPv6 and DHCPv6 and provide pump replacement for anaconda In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605191529.k4JFTsmV025218@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: add support for IPv6 and DHCPv6 and provide pump replacement for anaconda https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=186322 jvdias at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |192413 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 19 15:41:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 11:41:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192413] libdhcp : IPv6 and IPv4 DHCP client and network configuration library API In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605191541.k4JFfAKa028145@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: libdhcp : IPv6 and IPv4 DHCP client and network configuration library API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192413 jkeating at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|notting at redhat.com |jkeating at redhat.com OtherBugsDependingO|186322 |188267 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 19 15:48:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 11:48:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192363] Review Request: GTS - Gnu Triangulated Surface Library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605191548.k4JFmSNJ030227@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: GTS - Gnu Triangulated Surface Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192363 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2006-05-19 11:48 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > You are obviously a lot more familiar with it. Well, it's a dependency of other packages I package for local use. > Would you be interested in "owning" it in Extras? Not really ;) I am not actively using it, just passively (You might have noticed that I am packaging several 3D related packages). It's just that I have an (unclean) gts-0.7.4.spec myself, which I didn't intend to publish, because my interest in it is limited and because I feel, I already maintain too many packages. > I'd be glad to do that and would be equally happy > to try and maintain it myself. Either way is cool, I'd just like to have > a usable version of it in Extras. Exactly, what I want. So, this again is a case, I am willing to co-maintain and to team up, but I do not want to take the lead. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 19 15:51:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 11:51:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192417] New: Review Request: Wcl - Widget Creation Library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192417 Summary: Review Request: Wcl - Widget Creation Library Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: pertusus at free.fr QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com SRPM URL: http://www.environnement.ens.fr/perso/dumas/fc-srpms/Wcl-2.7.3-1.src.rpm Description: Wcl is completely widget set independent. It provides mechanisms to allow an entire user interface to be specified in resource files. Basically, this amounts to providing new resources for specifying the types of the widgets and the widget heirarchy. In addition, Wcl provides several callbacks and action functions which many programs need. The distribution contains files which make up the Widget Creation Library, and resource interpreters and utility libraries (which include Table widgets) for each of the following widget sets: Athena and Motif. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 19 15:54:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 11:54:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191671] Review Request: serpentine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605191554.k4JFs2Bo031926@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: serpentine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191671 fedora.wickert at arcor.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From fedora.wickert at arcor.de 2006-05-19 11:53 EST ------- $ md5sum serpentine-0.6.91-1.src.rpm 5965ec6a4622440337452084f79c5c59 serpentine-0.6.91-1.src.rpm REVIEW: - rpmlint clean: $ ls *.rpm serpentine-0.6.91-1.noarch.rpm serpentine-0.6.91-1.src.rpm $ rpmlint *.rpm ; echo $? 0 - package and spec naming OK - package meets guidelines - license is GPL, matches license field spec - license both included in source and %doc - spec file written in English and is legible - sources match upstream - package builds OK on FC5 (noarch) and in FC5 and rawhide mock (noarch) - BR's OK, on duplicates, no exeptions - locales handled correctly - no libraries to worry about - not relocatable - no directory ownership issues - no duplicates in %files - permissions OK, correct %defattr - %clean section present and correct - macro usage consistent - code, not content - no large docs - docs don't affect runtime - no pkgconfigs to worry about - no devel sub package needed - desktop file OK and properly installed - scriptlets match examples from wiki APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 19 15:54:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 11:54:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192413] libdhcp : IPv6 and IPv4 DHCP client and network configuration library API In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605191554.k4JFsK1X032011@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: libdhcp : IPv6 and IPv4 DHCP client and network configuration library API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192413 ------- Additional Comments From jvdias at redhat.com 2006-05-19 11:53 EST ------- Please also see: http://people.redhat.com/~jvdias/libdhcp/README (the readme file from the source tarball). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 19 15:54:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 11:54:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191305] Review Request: crossfire-client-images - Images for the crossfire client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605191554.k4JFsi5x032243@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: crossfire-client-images - Images for the crossfire client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191305 wart at kobold.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 19 15:55:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 11:55:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192413] libdhcp : IPv6 and IPv4 DHCP client and network configuration library API In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605191555.k4JFtXU5032474@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: libdhcp : IPv6 and IPv4 DHCP client and network configuration library API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192413 jvdias at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |186322 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 19 15:56:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 11:56:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192417] Review Request: Wcl - Widget Creation Library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605191556.k4JFuKRk032597@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Wcl - Widget Creation Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192417 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-05-19 11:56 EST ------- I modified the source quite a lot, to try to give better names to libraries: WcXp instead of Xp and WcListTree instead of Misc. I haven't really tested that the libraries are functionning. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 19 16:00:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 12:00:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191671] Review Request: serpentine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605191600.k4JG0402000975@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: serpentine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191671 fedora.wickert at arcor.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #129598|0 |1 is obsolete| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 19 15:59:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 11:59:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192418] New: Review Request: xbae - Xbae widget set Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192418 Summary: Review Request: xbae - Xbae widget set Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: pertusus at free.fr QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com SRPM URL: http://www.environnement.ens.fr/perso/dumas/fc-srpms/xbae-4.60.2-1.src.rpm Description: XbaeMatrix is a free Motif(R) table widget (also compatible with the free LessTif) which presents an editable array of string data to the user in a scrollable table similar to a spreadsheet. The rows and columns of the Matrix may optionally be labelled. A number of "fixed" and "trailing fixed" rows or columns may be specified. The XbaeCaption widget is a simple Motif manager widget that associates a label with a child. In addition the XbaeInput widget is being distributed, a text input field that provides generic customised data entry and formatting for strings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 19 16:03:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 12:03:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192417] Review Request: Wcl - Widget Creation Library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605191603.k4JG3wS5001767@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Wcl - Widget Creation Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192417 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |192418 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 19 16:03:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 12:03:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192418] Review Request: xbae - Xbae widget set In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605191603.k4JG3t0b001751@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xbae - Xbae widget set https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192418 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |192417 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-05-19 12:03 EST ------- Once/if this package is accepted grace may be rebuilt against it, I tested that grace builds against the exterenal Xbae, but not that it runs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 19 16:21:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 12:21:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189609] Review Request: galago-daemon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605191621.k4JGLA21005319@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: galago-daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189609 bdpepple at ameritech.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at ameritech.net 2006-05-19 12:20 EST ------- Packages built for FC5 & Devel. Thanks for the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 19 16:37:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 12:37:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 185325] Review Request: sparse In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605191637.k4JGbQdp009295@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sparse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=185325 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-05-19 12:37 EST ------- I think its great that you've created a spare package and waht to make this available to others through FE. But first you really should learn some stuff about FE procedures. I didn't find your bkyoung account in onwers.list, so I assume that this is your first package. To become an FE packager you must follow the following procedure: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/Contributors As is Outlined in the "Create Your Review Request" step you should have added the FE-NEEDSPONSOR blocker bug, since this is your first package. Please read the above page, the packaging guidelines and the review procedure wikipages thoroughly so that you can learn and understant the FE process / procedures. Also it is uncommon for package reviewers to have to put all the pieces like a git checkout and all your attachments together themselves. Instead create a .src.rpm file (rpmbuild -bs sparse.spec) upload that somewhere and put an URL in the review request (iow here in BZ). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 19 16:40:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 12:40:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 185325] Review Request: sparse In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605191640.k4JGed0V010186@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sparse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=185325 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 19 16:42:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 12:42:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192420] New: Review Request: Bonfire - CD/DVD burning app for gnome Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192420 Summary: Review Request: Bonfire - CD/DVD burning app for gnome Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: rouquier.p at wanadoo.fr QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://perso.wanadoo.fr/bonfire/bonfire.spec SRPM URL: http://perso.wanadoo.fr/bonfire/bonfire-0.3.1-1.src.rpm Description: bonfire is a CD/DVD application for the GNOME desktop designed to be easy and simple to use. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 19 16:47:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 12:47:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189656] Review Request: lilypond - A typesetting system for music notation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605191647.k4JGl6Uv011805@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lilypond - A typesetting system for music notation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189656 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-05-19 12:46 EST ------- First off, there are three empty PNG files in the documentation: E: lilypond-doc zero-length /usr/share/doc/lilypond-doc-2.8.2/input/mutopia/J.S.Bach/wtk1-fugue2.png E: lilypond-doc zero-length /usr/share/doc/lilypond-doc-2.8.2/input/mutopia/W.A.Mozart/mozart-hrn-3.png E: lilypond-doc zero-length /usr/share/doc/lilypond-doc-2.8.2/input/mutopia/E.Satie/petite-ouverture-a-danser.png Any idea about these? They come that way from upstream. I guess there's not much point in including them if they're empty. Other than that I have no issues. I do understand your point about the size of the documentation. Technically you could build it as a completely separate package because you're using a different upstream tarball, but once GS 8.50 is in you'll be able to build it directly and you'd be back to the same problem. Or you could just stick with using the upstream tarball. The packages with separate -doc packages not built from the main RPM all seem to be shipping preformatted documentation from upstream. I'm going to approve this package and leave it to you to fix the three empty files when you check in. Or if you like, you can strip the documentation from the base package and submit a separate package, which I promise to review quickly. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 19 16:49:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 12:49:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192413] libdhcp : IPv6 and IPv4 DHCP client and network configuration library API In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605191649.k4JGnDaQ012217@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: libdhcp : IPv6 and IPv4 DHCP client and network configuration library API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192413 ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-05-19 12:48 EST ------- Bad: - rpmlint fails on the srpm: E: libdhcp hardcoded-library-path in $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/usr/lib/pkgconfig E: libdhcp hardcoded-library-path in /usr/lib/pkgconfig/libdhcp.pc - Package does not build in mock: /usr/include/dhcp4client/isc-dhcp/minires/res_update.h:33:27: error: isc-dhcp/list.h: No such file or directory plus many other build failures. NEEDSWORK -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 19 17:08:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 13:08:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 165666] Review Request: Graph Visualization Tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605191708.k4JH8jKG015682@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Graph Visualization Tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=165666 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com orion at cora.nwra.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |orion at cora.nwra.com ------- Additional Comments From orion at cora.nwra.com 2006-05-19 13:08 EST ------- Is (In reply to comment #17) > graphviz-cairo-2.8 is now available: > http://www.graphviz.org/pub/graphviz/ARCHIVE/graphviz-cairo-2.8-1.src.rpm Is this the package intended to be submitted? Oliver, are you still going to be the maintainer? At first glance: - Non standard BuildRoot - No changelog entries. - What's up with __doc? - spec file perm is 600 - no ldconfig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 19 17:16:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 13:16:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 167364] Review Request: Fuse emulator utilities In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605191716.k4JHG5Rs017623@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Fuse emulator utilities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=167364 orion at cora.nwra.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 19 17:16:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 13:16:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 166960] Review Request: Fuse-emulator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605191716.k4JHGnc2017831@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Fuse-emulator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=166960 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 19 17:29:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 13:29:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192413] libdhcp : IPv6 and IPv4 DHCP client and network configuration library API In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605191729.k4JHTjnc020951@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: libdhcp : IPv6 and IPv4 DHCP client and network configuration library API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192413 ------- Additional Comments From jvdias at redhat.com 2006-05-19 13:29 EST ------- I'd say whatever tool you're using NEEDSWORK also - 1. There is no way currently of 'softcoding' the pkgconfig dir. - To use %{_libdir}/pkgconfig or %{prefix}/%{_lib}/pkgconfig would fail on multi-lib arches (as I found out with avahi) - /usr/lib64/pkgconfig is NOT a pkgconfig directory. The pkgconfig dir is ALWAYS /usr/lib/pkgconfig - until /usr/lib/rpm/macros gives us a nice %{_pkgconfig} variable. MANY other packages use pkgconfig, and they all have to specify /usr/lib/pkgconfig. I can remove the libdhcp.pc if you wish, but that would be a shame as it would prevent software being able to discover the Cflags, Libs, and Libs.private it requires automatically, which leads on to the next point. 2. Your tool is using the wrong include path, which it could have obtained by using 'pkg-config --cflags', to obtain '-I/usr/lib/dhcp4client' and '-I/usr/lib/dhcp4client/isc-dhcp', where the headers for the dhcp4client reside. If you could suggest a resolution, I'll implement it - what tool are you using ? It sounds like it needs fixing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 19 17:53:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 13:53:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192413] libdhcp : IPv6 and IPv4 DHCP client and network configuration library API In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605191753.k4JHreUE026587@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: libdhcp : IPv6 and IPv4 DHCP client and network configuration library API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192413 ------- Additional Comments From jvdias at redhat.com 2006-05-19 13:53 EST ------- OK, I've checked the pkgcfgdir thing - it is %{_libdir} - patch applied: --- libdhcp.spec.~1.5.~ 2006-05-19 09:24:17.000000000 -0400 +++ libdhcp.spec 2006-05-19 13:53:02.000000000 -0400 @@ -47,0 +48,3 @@ + +%define pkgcfgdir %{_libdir}/pkgconfig + @@ -49 +52 @@ -%makeinstall pkgcfgdir=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT/usr/lib/pkgconfig +%makeinstall pkgcfgdir=%{pkgcfgdir} New spec file with the above change checked into CVS and is on the website. But the second issue - those headers aren't even shipped by the package - they are shipped by its dependency, libdhcp4client-devel - libdhcp has this tag: BuildRequires: libdhcp4client-devel, libdhcp6client-devel, libnl-devel, pkgconfig It gets the correct include path using pkgconfig, and builds fine when its BuildRequires packages are installed. How are you getting that error: /usr/include/dhcp4client/isc-dhcp/minires/res_update.h:33:27: error: isc-dhcp/list.h: No such file or directory Any system that had libdhcp4client-devel installed would not generate that error when building libdhcp. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 19 17:58:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 13:58:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192164] Review Request: perl-Socket6 - IPv6 related part of the C socket.h defines and structure manipulators In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605191758.k4JHw0IY027440@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Socket6 - IPv6 related part of the C socket.h defines and structure manipulators https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192164 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |tibbs at math.uh.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 19 17:59:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 13:59:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191603] Review Request: rsnapshot -- rsync-based filesystem snapshots In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605191759.k4JHxHPu027689@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rsnapshot -- rsync-based filesystem snapshots https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191603 ghenry at suretecsystems.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ghenry at suretecsystems.com ------- Additional Comments From ghenry at suretecsystems.com 2006-05-19 13:59 EST ------- Hi all, I was originally using rsnapshot for a client, but no longer use it anymore. It was only ever brought in via the devel tree, but doing a cvs up brings in FC-4 and FC-5. It must have slipped by me, as I maintain quite a few and I am currently too busy for this one as well. I would not mind at all if Chris wishes to take it over. Please feel free to transfer ownership. Many thanks, Gavin. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 19 18:03:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 14:03:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192413] libdhcp : IPv6 and IPv4 DHCP client and network configuration library API In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605191803.k4JI3WKM028752@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: libdhcp : IPv6 and IPv4 DHCP client and network configuration library API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192413 ------- Additional Comments From jvdias at redhat.com 2006-05-19 14:02 EST ------- Revised patch applied: --- libdhcp.spec.~1.5.~ 2006-05-19 09:24:17.000000000 -0400 +++ libdhcp.spec 2006-05-19 14:07:43.000000000 -0400 @@ -47,0 +48,3 @@ + +%define pkgcfgdir %{_libdir}/pkgconfig + @@ -49 +52 @@ -%makeinstall pkgcfgdir=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT/usr/lib/pkgconfig +%makeinstall pkgcfgdir=${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}%{pkgcfgdir} @@ -72 +75 @@ -/usr/lib/pkgconfig/libdhcp.pc +%{pkgcfgdir}/libdhcp.pc -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 19 18:22:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 14:22:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192430] New: Review Request: python-kiwi - Framework for Python GUI applications Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192430 Summary: Review Request: python-kiwi - Framework for Python GUI applications Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: icon at fedoraproject.org QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://blues.mcgill.ca/~icon/fe/python-kiwi.spec SRPM URL: http://blues.mcgill.ca/~icon/fe/python-kiwi-1.9.8-0.2.src.rpm Description: Kiwi consists of a set of classes and wrappers for PyGTK that were developed to provide a sort of framework for applications. Fully object-oriented, and roughly Smalltalk's MVC, Kiwi provides a simple, practical way to build forms, windows and widgets that transparently access and display your object data. PS: New version of gazpacho (already in extras) requires it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 19 18:27:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 14:27:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192432] New: Review Request: compiz Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192432 Summary: Review Request: compiz Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: alcapcom at gmail.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://users.telenet.be/quenta/SPECS/compiz.spec SRPM URL: http://users.telenet.be/quenta/repo/compiz-1.0.0-4.src.rpm Description: Compiz is an OpenGL compositing manager that use GLX_EXT_texture_from_drawable for binding redirected top-level windows to texture objects. It has a flexible plug-in system and it is designed to run well on most graphics hardware. This paquage is based on that proposed by Tom Callaway for FC3TEST3 and that of suse, i have especially use these of suse in order to find a stable version of (compiz, xgl and mesa), packaged by the developer of the program it self. For the build requieres, I have just recompiler those provided by Tom, must I do a request for these packages too? They are my first paquackages and I need a sponsor. regards, Al -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 19 18:28:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 14:28:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190129] Review Request: python-krbV In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605191828.k4JIS8GV002593@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-krbV https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190129 ------- Additional Comments From mikeb at redhat.com 2006-05-19 14:27 EST ------- This has been waiting around for a review for a while now. Any chance of getting it reviewed? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 19 18:31:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 14:31:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192434] New: Review Request: compiz-quinn Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192434 Summary: Review Request: compiz-quinn Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: alcapcom at gmail.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://users.telenet.be/quenta/SPECS/compiz-quinn.spec SRPM URL: http://users.telenet.be/quenta/repo/compiz-quinn-0.0.10-1.src.rpm Description: Compiz is an OpenGL compositing manager that use GLX_EXT_texture_from_drawable for binding redirected top-level windows to texture objects. It has a flexible plug-in system and it is designed to run well on most graphics hardware. This version of compiz use the sources of Quinn Strom -> http://xgl.compiz.info/ (it contain all the last patches and plugins for compiz). at this time, this version is less stable than these of suse by David Reveman. They are my first paquackages and I need a sponsor. regards, Al -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 19 18:35:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 14:35:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192413] libdhcp : IPv6 and IPv4 DHCP client and network configuration library API In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605191835.k4JIZgfc005424@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: libdhcp : IPv6 and IPv4 DHCP client and network configuration library API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192413 ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-05-19 14:35 EST ------- The tool used is mock, which is what your package needs to be able to build in as part of the Package Guidelines. However as you state, it may be a problem in the deps of the BuildReqs that are brought in, this needs to be investigated. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 19 18:37:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 14:37:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 186892] Review Request: conntrack - Tool to manipulate netfilter connection tracking table In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605191837.k4JIbBJ2006073@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: conntrack - Tool to manipulate netfilter connection tracking table https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=186892 i at stingr.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 19 18:37:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 14:37:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192436] New: Review Request: compiz-quinn Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192436 Summary: Review Request: compiz-quinn Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: alcapcom at gmail.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://users.telenet.be/quenta/SPECS/xorg-x11-server-Xgl.spec SRPM URL: http://users.telenet.be/quenta/repo/xorg-x11-server-Xgl-1.1.99.1-1.src.rpm Description: Xgl is an Xserver that uses OpenGL for its drawing operations. Some operations like antialiased font rendering is noticably faster with this technology, and future graphics hardware might only have support for 3D operations and no 2D core any more. For compile xgl, I have only must update xorg-x11-proto-devel from the Tom's srpms. xorg-x11-proto-devel updated source: compositeproto - > 0.3 fixesproto - > 4.0 scrnsaverproto - > 1.1.0 For all the others build requieres, I have just recompiler those provided by Tom. This paquage is based on that proposed by Tom Callaway for FC3TEST3 and that of suse, i have especially use these of suse in order to find a stable version of (compiz, xgl and mesa), packaged by the developer of the program it self. They are my first paquackages and I need a sponsor. regards, Al -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 19 18:43:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 14:43:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192438] New: Review Request: compiz-quinn Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192438 Summary: Review Request: compiz-quinn Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: alcapcom at gmail.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://users.telenet.be/quenta/SPECS/fedora-xgl-settings.spec SRPM URL: http://users.telenet.be/quenta/repo/fedora-xgl-settings-0.0.1-1.src.rpm Description: At this time, a whole of bash script to configure xgl on fedora. They are my first paquackages and I need a sponsor. regards, Al -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 19 18:44:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 14:44:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192439] New: Review Request: fedora-xgl-settings Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192439 Summary: Review Request: fedora-xgl-settings Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: alcapcom at gmail.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://users.telenet.be/quenta/SPECS/fedora-xgl-settings.spec SRPM URL: http://users.telenet.be/quenta/repo/fedora-xgl-settings-0.0.1-1.src.rpm Description: At this time, a whole of bash script to configure xgl on fedora. They are my first paquackages and I need a sponsor. regards, Al -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 19 18:47:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 14:47:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192441] New: Review Request: gset-compiz Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192441 Summary: Review Request: gset-compiz Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: alcapcom at gmail.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://users.telenet.be/quenta/SPECS/gset-compiz.spec SRPM URL: http://users.telenet.be/quenta/repo/gset-compiz-0.3.3-1.src.rpm Description: gtk-tool to configure compiz They are my first set paquackages and I need a sponsor. regards, Al -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 19 18:59:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 14:59:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192436] Review Request: compiz-quinn In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605191859.k4JIxotc013044@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compiz-quinn https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192436 ------- Additional Comments From alcapcom at gmail.com 2006-05-19 14:59 EST ------- sorry for the request title, the good package name is xorg-x11-server-Xgl. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 19 19:06:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 15:06:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192438] Review Request: compiz-quinn In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605191906.k4JJ6FvZ014663@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compiz-quinn https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192438 ------- Additional Comments From alcapcom at gmail.com 2006-05-19 15:06 EST ------- sorry I wanted to make the thing too quickly, the real package name is fedora-xgl-settings -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 19 19:15:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 15:15:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192438] Review Request: fedora-xgl-settings In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605191915.k4JJFRqd017780@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fedora-xgl-settings https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192438 ville.skytta at iki.fi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: compiz-quinn|Review Request: fedora-xgl- | |settings OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 19 19:16:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 15:16:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192436] Review Request: xorg-x11-server-Xgl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605191916.k4JJGAuj017951@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xorg-x11-server-Xgl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192436 ville.skytta at iki.fi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: compiz-quinn|Review Request: xorg-x11- | |server-Xgl OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 19 19:26:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 15:26:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192164] Review Request: perl-Socket6 - IPv6 related part of the C socket.h defines and structure manipulators In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605191926.k4JJQrDh021356@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Socket6 - IPv6 related part of the C socket.h defines and structure manipulators https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192164 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-05-19 15:26 EST ------- * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible; license text is included in the package. * source files match upstream: 35e4bb7e09ca3154a44bcaa8959780a2 Socket6-0.19.tar.gz 35e4bb7e09ca3154a44bcaa8959780a2 Socket6-0.19.tar.gz-srpm * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane. * shared libraries are present, but internal to Perl so no need to call ldconfig. * package is not relocatable. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * %clean is present. * %check is present and all tests pass: All tests successful. Files=1, Tests=3, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.02 cusr + 0.01 csys = 0.03 CPU) * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no libtool .la droppings. * not a GUI app. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 19 19:33:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 15:33:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192413] libdhcp : IPv6 and IPv4 DHCP client and network configuration library API In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605191933.k4JJXHTf023312@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: libdhcp : IPv6 and IPv4 DHCP client and network configuration library API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192413 ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-05-19 15:32 EST ------- + CFLAGS='-O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64 -mtune=generic ' + CC=gcc + make -j2 gcc -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64 -mtune=generic -fPIC -I. -Wall -Werror -c -o libdhcp.o libdhcp.c Package libdhcp4client was not found in the pkg-config search path. Perhaps you should add the directory containing `libdhcp4client.pc' to the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable No package 'libdhcp4client' found gcc -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64 -mtune=generic -fPIC -I. -Wall -Werror -c -o dhcp4_lease.o dhcp4_lease.c Package libdhcp4client was not found in the pkg-config search path. Perhaps you should add the directory containing `libdhcp4client.pc' to the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable No package 'libdhcp4client' found Package libdhcp4client was not found in the pkg-config search path. Perhaps you should add the directory containing `libdhcp4client.pc' to the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable No package 'libdhcp4client' found dhcp4_lease.c:29:28: error: isc-dhcp/dhcpd.h: No such file or directory Thats more output from the build log. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 19 19:40:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 15:40:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192436] Review Request: xorg-x11-server-Xgl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605191940.k4JJeoHD025337@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xorg-x11-server-Xgl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192436 ------- Additional Comments From che666 at gmail.com 2006-05-19 15:40 EST ------- + patch -p0 -b --suffix .maprules-tolower-fix.diff -s 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file xkb/maprules.c.rej unfortunately i see an error with the patch. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 19 19:49:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 15:49:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188180] Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605191949.k4JJnOhm027950@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188180 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-05-19 15:49 EST ------- Thanks for the clarification. I didn't see it because I don't have a x86_64 box. I fixed pkgconfig link bits to reference %qt_dirname/%%_lib instead. qt-4.1.3-1 update coming as soon as my mock build finishes OK. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 19 19:53:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 15:53:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192460] New: Review Request: pygobject2-2.10.1 Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192460 Summary: Review Request: pygobject2-2.10.1 Product: Fedora Core Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: notting at redhat.com ReportedBy: johnp at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/johnp/files/pygobject/pygobject2.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/johnp/files/pygobject/pygobject2-2.10.1-1.src.rpm Description: Split of the pygtk2 package -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 19 19:56:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 15:56:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192460] Review Request: pygobject2-2.10.1 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605191956.k4JJub48029362@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pygobject2-2.10.1 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192460 johnp at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE ------- Additional Comments From johnp at redhat.com 2006-05-19 15:56 EST ------- Sorry, for some reason I couldn't find my last request so I thought it didn't get filed. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 191534 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 19 19:56:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 15:56:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191534] Review Request: pygobject2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605191956.k4JJumQM029442@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pygobject2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191534 ------- Additional Comments From johnp at redhat.com 2006-05-19 15:56 EST ------- *** Bug 192460 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 19 19:59:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 15:59:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191534] Review Request: pygobject2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605191959.k4JJxhLK030298@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pygobject2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191534 jkeating at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|notting at redhat.com |jkeating at redhat.com OtherBugsDependingO|188265 |188267 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 19 20:17:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 16:17:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191534] Review Request: pygobject2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605192017.k4JKH0g3001341@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pygobject2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191534 ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-05-19 16:16 EST ------- Bad: - Buildroot should be %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) - Description line should be 80chars max per line - rpmlint isn't happy w/ the build package: E: pygobject2 script-without-shellbang /usr/share/doc/pygobject2-2.10.1/examples/Makefile.in E: pygobject2 script-without-shellbang /usr/share/doc/pygobject2-2.10.1/examples/signal.py E: pygobject2 script-without-shellbang /usr/lib64/python2.4/site-packages/pygtk.pth E: pygobject2 script-without-shellbang /usr/share/doc/pygobject2-2.10.1/examples/Makefile E: pygobject2 script-without-shellbang /usr/share/doc/pygobject2-2.10.1/AUTHORS E: pygobject2 script-without-shellbang /usr/lib64/python2.4/site-packages/pygtk.py E: pygobject2 script-without-shellbang /usr/share/doc/pygobject2-2.10.1/README E: pygobject2 script-without-shellbang /usr/share/doc/pygobject2-2.10.1/NEWS E: pygobject2 script-without-shellbang /usr/share/doc/pygobject2-2.10.1/examples/properties.py E: pygobject2 script-without-shellbang /usr/share/doc/pygobject2-2.10.1/ChangeLog E: pygobject2 script-without-shellbang /usr/share/doc/pygobject2-2.10.1/examples/Makefile.am rpmlint -I script-without-shellbang script-without-shellbang : This executable text file does not contain a shebang, thus it cannot be properly executed. Often this is a sign of spurious executable bits for a non-script file, but can also be a case of a missing shebang. To fix this error, find out which case of the above it is, and either remove the executable bits or add the shebang. Perhaps the defattr is a bit overbearing? Question: - The dep in the -devel package could lead to -devel being out of sync w/ a release of the main package. Is this an issue? Suggestion: - No period in summary lines - Add a URL tag NEEDSWORK -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 19 20:24:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 16:24:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 173459] Review Request: initng In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605192024.k4JKOBJT003155@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 ------- Additional Comments From dragoran at feuerpokemon.de 2006-05-19 16:23 EST ------- (In reply to comment #285) > #283 > > well thats what i meant i think... if the comments from around nov 2005 are from > you then sorry for misreferencing you. > > for suspend resume i am going to file it upstream once i figure out more why it > barfs... anyone is invited to help me though. > swsusp2 works if i swapon manually. maybe the whole not swap mounting issue hsa > to do with the facts that i use LABEL for the swap partition. > to be investigated. > > i will also discuss the issue with upstream... i am quite often on freenode > #initng with nick "che" > > inconvenience vs not beeing able to build it for extras at all. you pick ;) > > i agree that it would be nicer if ifiles would be installed automatically if > initng is pulled but currently that just cant happen. it would be easier to drop the initng -> initng-devel dep -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 19 20:24:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 16:24:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192436] Review Request: xorg-x11-server-Xgl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605192024.k4JKOI5e003185@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xorg-x11-server-Xgl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192436 ------- Additional Comments From che666 at gmail.com 2006-05-19 16:24 EST ------- when trying to rebuild without patches: make[3]: *** [api_arrayelt.lo] Error 1 make[3]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... In file included from accum.h:41, from accum.c:26: mtypes.h:44:20: error: bitset.h: No such file or directory accum.c: In function '_mesa_ClearAccum': accum.c:50: warning: dereferencing type-punned pointer will break strict-aliasing rules In file included from api_loopback.c:39: mtypes.h:44:20: error: bitset.h: No such file or directory -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 19 20:29:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 16:29:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192413] libdhcp : IPv6 and IPv4 DHCP client and network configuration library API In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605192029.k4JKTr5l004395@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: libdhcp : IPv6 and IPv4 DHCP client and network configuration library API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192413 ------- Additional Comments From jvdias at redhat.com 2006-05-19 16:29 EST ------- Thanks - I see the problem - libdhcp4client and libdhcp6client both install their pkgconfig files in /usr/lib/pkgconfig :-( I'm now rebuilding them - I guess its OK to do a move-pkgs -d on them and then just rebuild the same version since they were both just built today and haven't gone out to anyone - rebuilding now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 19 20:39:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 16:39:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191603] Review Request: rsnapshot -- rsync-based filesystem snapshots In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605192039.k4JKdEwr007739@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rsnapshot -- rsync-based filesystem snapshots https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191603 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-05-19 16:39 EST ------- Well, Chris, it's all yours. Announce to extras-list that you're taking this package over (reference this bug), edit owners.list and have at it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 19 20:41:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 16:41:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191603] Review Request: rsnapshot -- rsync-based filesystem snapshots In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605192041.k4JKfvNY008266@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rsnapshot -- rsync-based filesystem snapshots https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191603 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-05-19 16:41 EST ------- BTW, I'm going to go ahead and approve this, since the submitted package is fine, even though technically this review wasn't needed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 19 20:43:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 16:43:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190997] Review Request: linux-wlan-ng In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605192043.k4JKhl75008877@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: linux-wlan-ng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190997 ------- Additional Comments From redhat at flyn.org 2006-05-19 16:43 EST ------- Integrates Thorsten's changes: Spec URL: http://www.flyn.org/SRPMS/linux-wlan-ng.spec SRPM URL: http://www.flyn.org/SRPMS/linux-wlan-ng-kmod-0.2.3-3.2.6.16_1.2096_FC5.src.rpm Spec URL: http://www.flyn.org/SRPMS/linux-wlan-ng-tools.spec SRPM URL: http://www.flyn.org/SRPMS/linux-wlan-ng-tools-0.2.3-3.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 19 20:46:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 16:46:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191200] Review Request: lvm2-cluster In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605192046.k4JKkCAX009430@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lvm2-cluster https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191200 jkeating at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO_REPORTER -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 19 20:47:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 16:47:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192432] Review Request: compiz In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605192047.k4JKl0LC009712@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compiz https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192432 che666 at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |che666 at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From che666 at gmail.com 2006-05-19 16:46 EST ------- make[3]: *** [api_arrayelt.lo] Error 1 make[3]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... In file included from accum.h:41, from accum.c:26: mtypes.h:44:20: error: bitset.h: No such file or directory accum.c: In function '_mesa_ClearAccum': accum.c:50: warning: dereferencing type-punned pointer will break strict-aliasing rules In file included from api_loopback.c:39: mtypes.h:44:20: error: bitset.h: No such file or directory -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 19 20:56:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 16:56:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192439] Review Request: fedora-xgl-settings In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605192056.k4JKumoj011751@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fedora-xgl-settings https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192439 ------- Additional Comments From alcapcom at gmail.com 2006-05-19 16:56 EST ------- this request is a duplicate! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 19 20:59:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 16:59:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188180] Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605192059.k4JKxv14012511@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188180 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-05-19 16:59 EST ------- Spec Name or Url: http://kde-redhat.unl.edu/apt/kde-redhat/SPECS/qt4-4.1.3-1.spec SRPM Name or Url: http://kde-redhat.unl.edu/apt/kde-redhat/all/SRPMS.stable/qt4-4.1.3-1.src.rpm %changelog * Fri May 19 2006 Rex Dieter 4.1.3-1 - 4.1.3 - %%qtdir/lib/*.pc -> %%qtdir/%%_lib/*.pc (hopefully, the last hardcoded reference to %%qtdir/lib) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 19 21:15:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 17:15:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192413] libdhcp : IPv6 and IPv4 DHCP client and network configuration library API In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605192115.k4JLFjAk015856@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: libdhcp : IPv6 and IPv4 DHCP client and network configuration library API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192413 ------- Additional Comments From jvdias at redhat.com 2006-05-19 17:15 EST ------- OK, fixed now - sorry about that - all pkgconfigs are now in correct locations on multi-arch machines: $ rpm -qplv /mnt/redhat/dist/fc6/dhcp{,v6}/{0.10-24,3.0.4-6}/{x86_64,ppc64,s390x}/* | grep pkgconfig -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 184 May 19 16:53 /usr/lib64/pkgconfig/libdhcp4client.pc -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 184 May 19 16:55 /usr/lib64/pkgconfig/libdhcp4client.pc -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 184 May 19 16:54 /usr/lib64/pkgconfig/libdhcp4client.pc -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 224 May 19 17:14 /usr/lib64/pkgconfig/libdhcp6client.pc -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 224 May 19 17:14 /usr/lib64/pkgconfig/libdhcp6client.pc -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 224 May 19 17:14 /usr/lib64/pkgconfig/libdhcp6client.pc -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 19 21:16:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 17:16:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190066] Review Request: php-pear-Mail In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605192116.k4JLGDXx015986@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Mail https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190066 gauret at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From gauret at free.fr 2006-05-19 17:16 EST ------- Review for release 4: * RPM name is OK * Source Mail-1.1.10.tgz is the same as upstream * rpmlint looks OK * File list looks OK * Works fine APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 19 21:24:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 17:24:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192475] New: Review Request: perl-PadWalker - Play with other peoples' lexical variables Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192475 Summary: Review Request: perl-PadWalker - Play with other peoples' lexical variables Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: jpo at di.uminho.pt QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://gsd.di.uminho.pt/jpo/software/fedora/perl-PadWalker.spec SRPM URL: http://gsd.di.uminho.pt/jpo/software/fedora/perl-PadWalker-1.0-1.src.rpm Description: PadWalker is a module which allows you to inspect (and even change!) lexical variables in any subroutine which called you. It will only show those variables which are in scope at the point of the call. Note: This is a new requirement of perl-Devel-Cycle 1.05 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 19 21:37:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 17:37:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190129] Review Request: python-krbV In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605192137.k4JLb7Hk020796@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-krbV https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190129 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |tibbs at math.uh.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-05-19 17:36 EST ------- I'm no Python expert but I'll have a go. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 19 21:48:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 17:48:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192413] libdhcp : IPv6 and IPv4 DHCP client and network configuration library API In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605192148.k4JLmku9023407@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: libdhcp : IPv6 and IPv4 DHCP client and network configuration library API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192413 ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-05-19 17:48 EST ------- Hrm, so I don't get the pkg-config errors, now I just get: + make -j2 gcc -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64 -mtune=generic -fPIC -I. -Wall -Werror -c -o libdhcp.o libdhcp.c gcc -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64 -mtune=generic -fPIC -I. -Wall -Werror -I/usr/include/dhcp4client -I/usr/include/dhcp 4client/isc-dhcp -c -o dhcp4_lease.o dhcp4_lease.c In file included from /usr/include/dhcp4client/isc-dhcp/minires/minires.h:30, from /usr/include/dhcp4client/isc-dhcp/dhcpd.h:61, from dhcp4_lease.c:29: /usr/include/dhcp4client/isc-dhcp/minires/res_update.h:33:27: error: isc-dhcp/list.h: No such file or directory In file included from /usr/include/dhcp4client/isc-dhcp/minires/minires.h:30, from /usr/include/dhcp4client/isc-dhcp/dhcpd.h:61, from dhcp4_lease.c:29: /usr/include/dhcp4client/isc-dhcp/minires/res_update.h:39: error: expected specifier-qualifier-list before 'ISC_LINK' /usr/include/dhcp4client/isc-dhcp/minires/res_update.h:55: error: function definition declared 'typedef' cc1: warnings being treated as errors -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 19 21:51:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 17:51:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191534] Review Request: pygobject2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605192151.k4JLpP8A023834@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pygobject2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191534 ------- Additional Comments From johnp at redhat.com 2006-05-19 17:51 EST ------- Fixed Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/johnp/files/pygobject/pygobject2.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/johnp/files/pygobject/pygobject2-2.10.1-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 19 22:19:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 18:19:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191534] Review Request: pygobject2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605192219.k4JMJjEp028701@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pygobject2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191534 jkeating at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|188267 |188268 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-05-19 18:19 EST ------- rpmlint happy. I'm happy. Package happy. (; Approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 19 22:26:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 18:26:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 169703] Review Request: pari - Number Theory-oriented Computer Algebra System In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605192226.k4JMQo3a030085@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pari - Number Theory-oriented Computer Algebra System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=169703 orion at cora.nwra.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |orion at cora.nwra.com ------- Additional Comments From orion at cora.nwra.com 2006-05-19 18:26 EST ------- In FC5 mock, I get: dvips -t landscape -t a4 refcard.dvi -o refcard.ps make[2]: dvips: Command not found make[2]: *** [refcard.ps] Error 127 Looks like a needed BR on tetex-dvips. I ended up dropping the --host= line altogether and patching the Makefile to correctly build the shared library. SRPM here: http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/pari-2.1.7-4.src.rpm Builds on FC5 x86, x86_64, and ppc here. Haven't fixed: W: pari doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/pari-2.1.7/misc/gpflog /bin/sh W: pari doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/pari-2.1.7/misc/xgp /bin/sh W: pari-devel no-documentation Still get: E: pari shlib-with-non-pic-code /usr/lib/libpari.so.2.1.7 This appears to be because of the following line from objdump: # objdump --headers --private-headers /usr/lib/libpari.so.2.1.7 | grep TEXTREL TEXTREL 0x0 which rpmlint looks for. Other .so's with this: TEXTREL 0x0 /usr/lib/libGL.so TEXTREL 0x0 /usr/lib/libGLU.so TEXTREL 0x0 /usr/lib/libj3dcore-ogl.so TEXTREL 0x0 /usr/lib/libj3dutils.so TEXTREL 0x0 /usr/lib/libmpeg-0.3.0.so TEXTREL 0x0 /usr/lib/libmpeg.so So it might be caused by the assembly code in the library. No sure about that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 19 22:37:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 18:37:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 174898] Review Request: perl-HTML-FillInForm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605192237.k4JMbM7O000577@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-HTML-FillInForm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174898 orion at cora.nwra.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 19 22:41:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 18:41:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 176580] Review Request: x11-ssh-askpass -- the cool brother of gnome-ssh-askpass In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605192241.k4JMf1hP001463@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: x11-ssh-askpass -- the cool brother of gnome-ssh-askpass https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176580 orion at cora.nwra.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 19 22:53:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 18:53:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190129] Review Request: python-krbV In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605192253.k4JMr8FY003635@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-krbV https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190129 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-05-19 18:52 EST ------- A few issues: specfile in srpm is mode 0600 and source tarball in srpm is mode 0664. Both should be 644. These probably don't matter once things are in CVS, but just in case I would fix them before checking in. There's no reason to BuildRequires: python; python-devel will pull it in (not a blocker). You use %{optflags} instead of $RPM_OPT_FLAGS (which is fine), but still use $RPM_BUILD_ROOT instead of %{buildroot}. The guidelines explicitly discourage this: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-f3d77b27a5d29dfc1f5600ef3fc836f2e317badf Review: * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. X specfile is properly named and is cleanly written but does not use macros consistently (see $RPM_BUILD_ROOT comment above). * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible; license text is included in the package. * source files match upstream (makes sense; you are the upstream): b79db9912efd76ab9a88441e455455d4 python-krbV-1.0.12.tar.gz b79db9912efd76ab9a88441e455455d4 python-krbV-1.0.12.tar.gz-srpm * latest version is being packaged. O BuildRequires are proper (BR: python not needed but not a blocker). * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). O rpmlint is silent (it does warn about inappropriate permissions in the SRPM). * final provides and requires are sane: krbVmodule.so()(64bit) python-krbV = 1.0.12-2.fc6 - libc.so.6()(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4)(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4)(64bit) libkrb5.so.3()(64bit) libkrb5.so.3(krb5_3_MIT)(64bit) python(abi) = 2.4 python-abi = 2.4 rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 * shared libraries are present, but internal to Python so there's no need to run ldconfig. * no .pyo files to %ghost. * package is not relocatable. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. O file permissions are appropriate, except in the srpm. * %clean is present. O %check is not present; no test suite upstream. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no libtool .la droppings. * not a GUI app. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 19 23:32:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 19:32:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192413] libdhcp : IPv6 and IPv4 DHCP client and network configuration library API In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605192332.k4JNWdcH010249@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: libdhcp : IPv6 and IPv4 DHCP client and network configuration library API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192413 ------- Additional Comments From jvdias at redhat.com 2006-05-19 19:32 EST ------- This is very strange. I'm not seeing anything like this when I build libdhcp in the dist-fc6 buildroot /tmp/jvd on the FC-6 build servers . I've tried i386, x86_64, ia64, ppc64, and all builds OK with '-Wall -Werror', and the RPM %install and binary RPM production succeeds with no errors (I'm appending the logs - perhaps they'll give a clue as to the differences between your build environment and that of the FC-6 build servers). Please let me have access to the build environment you are using and I'll be able to find the problem - all I know is that the package builds without any errors of any sort on i386, ia64, x86_64, and ppc64 FC-6 - I can repeat on the s390s if you wish. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 19 23:37:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 19:37:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192413] libdhcp : IPv6 and IPv4 DHCP client and network configuration library API In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605192337.k4JNbgx0011419@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: libdhcp : IPv6 and IPv4 DHCP client and network configuration library API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192413 ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-05-19 19:37 EST ------- Sounds like you're missing a BuildRequires. The beehive buildroots operate on an 'everything' install, so a missing buildreq won't be noticed. Mock however starts with a minimal clean buildroot and then relies upon BuildRequires (and subsequent Requires of those) to populate the buildroot for building. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 19 23:43:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 19:43:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192413] libdhcp : IPv6 and IPv4 DHCP client and network configuration library API In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605192343.k4JNhK5Q012747@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: libdhcp : IPv6 and IPv4 DHCP client and network configuration library API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192413 ------- Additional Comments From jvdias at redhat.com 2006-05-19 19:42 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=129663) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=129663&action=view) log of builds in the dist-fc6-build root of x86_64 hs20-bc1-5, 2. ia64 altix2, ppc64 js20-bc1-12 Here's a log showing the successful builds on the build servers - the /tmp/jvd/ directory should still contain the builds, unless they've been removed . -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 19 23:54:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 19:54:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192413] libdhcp : IPv6 and IPv4 DHCP client and network configuration library API In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605192354.k4JNsE2T014560@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: libdhcp : IPv6 and IPv4 DHCP client and network configuration library API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192413 ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-05-19 19:53 EST ------- Ah ha. I found that dhcp-devel needs to be in the build root. So now the question is, do one of the other -devel packages need to bring in dhcp-devel to satisfy their include statements? Just BuildReq'ing dhcp-devel may not be the answer here. Since the error comes from /usr/include/dhcp4client/isc-dhcp/minires/res_update.h, one would wager that dhcp4client-devel (and probably dhcp6client-devel) should have a Requires dhcp-devel. Shall I file a bug for that, or will you take care of that so this package will build? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 19 23:58:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 19:58:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192413] libdhcp : IPv6 and IPv4 DHCP client and network configuration library API In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605192358.k4JNwaig015318@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: libdhcp : IPv6 and IPv4 DHCP client and network configuration library API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192413 ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-05-19 19:58 EST ------- rpmlint found a few things w/ the binary package: E: libdhcp explicit-lib-dependency libdhcp4client E: libdhcp explicit-lib-dependency libdhcp6client E: libdhcp explicit-lib-dependency libnl W: libdhcp incoherent-version-in-changelog 1.0-1 1.1-1.beta You should let rpmbuild figure out the Requires, instead of manually inserting them, unless rpm is getting it wrong. Is rpm getting it wrong? The -devel package doesn't have a dep on the main package. Is this ok? Does the -devel package need the main package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 20 00:07:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 20:07:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191452] Review Request: orpie - scientific calculator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605200007.k4K07wlS016869@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: orpie - scientific calculator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191452 lists at forevermore.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 20 01:15:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 21:15:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 174898] Review Request: perl-HTML-FillInForm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605200115.k4K1FenT028715@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-HTML-FillInForm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174898 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 20 01:49:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 21:49:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192413] libdhcp : IPv6 and IPv4 DHCP client and network configuration library API In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605200149.k4K1ndsP002362@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: libdhcp : IPv6 and IPv4 DHCP client and network configuration library API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192413 ------- Additional Comments From jvdias at redhat.com 2006-05-19 21:49 EST ------- Firstly, the isc-dhcp issue - now dhcp-3.0.8's libdhcp4client-devel provides , not , which is provided by dhcp-devel. Yes, libdhcp requires the dhcp-devel headers in to build - dhcp-devel is now in the build requires. There are only two .c files in libdhcp that require the ISC DHCP headers, dhcp4_lease.c and dhcp4_nic.c, whose purpose it could be said is to avoid any programs which use them ever having to require the DHCP headers. Similarly for dhcpv6, ONLY libdhcp's dhcp6_lease.c and dhcp6_lease.nic need to include the dhcp6 headers. This is shown clearly in a log of the build without the extra RPM stuff: $ CFLAGS='-g3 -gdwarf-2' make cc -g3 -gdwarf-2 -fPIC -I. -Wall -Werror -c -o libdhcp.o libdhcp.c cc -g3 -gdwarf-2 -fPIC -I. -Wall -Werror -I/usr/include/dhcp4client -I/usr/include/dhcp4client/isc_dhcp -c -o dhcp4_lease.o dhcp4_lease.c cc -g3 -gdwarf-2 -fPIC -I. -Wall -Werror -I/usr/include/dhcp4client -I/usr/include/dhcp4client/isc_dhcp -c -o dhcp4_nic.o dhcp4_nic.c cc -g3 -gdwarf-2 -fPIC -I. -Wall -Werror -I/usr/include/dhcp6client -I/usr/include/dhcp6client/dhcpv6 -c -o dhcp6_lease.o dhcp6_lease.c cc -g3 -gdwarf-2 -fPIC -I. -Wall -Werror -c -o dhcp6_nic.o dhcp6_nic.c cc -g3 -gdwarf-2 -fPIC -I. -Wall -Werror -c -o nic.o nic.c cc -g3 -gdwarf-2 -fPIC -I. -Wall -Werror -c -o dhcp_nic.o dhcp_nic.c cc -shared -o libdhcp.so.1 -Wl,-soname,libdhcp.so.1 libdhcp.o dhcp4_lease.o dhcp4_nic.o dhcp6_lease.o dhcp6_nic.o nic.o dhcp_nic.o -lnl -ldhcp6client -ldhcp4client /bin/ln -sf libdhcp.so.1 libdhcp.so ar crus libdhcp.a libdhcp.o dhcp4_lease.o dhcp4_nic.o dhcp6_lease.o dhcp6_nic.o nic.o dhcp_nic.o About the "explicit-lib-dependency" - yes, libdhcp does require the libdhcp4client and libdhcp6client libraries - it cannot be used at all without them, so I thought they should be in its list of 'Requires:' - rpm does not complain at all about them when I make the RPM - but I've taken them out as you suggested. About the devel package dep - in the current .spec file, it says: %package devel ... Requires: %{name}-%{version}-%{release} Please ensure you're looking at the latest version of the .spec file , which is now in elvis & devel CVS . -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 20 02:01:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 22:01:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 173459] Review Request: initng In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605200201.k4K21DLF004195@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 ------- Additional Comments From che666 at gmail.com 2006-05-19 22:01 EST ------- spec file issue: add the default opt flags to the cmake line... like: cmake . -DBUILD_SELINUX:BOOL=ON -DCOUNT_ME:BOOL=OFF -DCMAKE_SKIP_RPATH:BOOL=ON -DLIB_INSTALL_DIR:STRING=/%{_lib} -DCMAKE_CXX_FLAGS:STRING='%{optflags}' -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 20 03:03:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 23:03:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192490] New: Review Request: python-ogg - A Python wrapper for the Ogg libraries Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192490 Summary: Review Request: python-ogg - A Python wrapper for the Ogg libraries Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: hugo at devin.com.br QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.devin.com.br/eitch/rpm/fedora/SPECS/python-ogg.spec SRPM URL: http://www.devin.com.br/eitch/rpm/fedora/5/SRPMS/python-ogg-1.3-1.src.rpm Description: An object-oriented Python binding for the Ogg libraries. Ogg is a multimedia bitstream format. With this you can write your own python applications to play and encode audio files in ogg format. Note: Running rpmlint gave a Warning because we have a single include file (.h) in the package. Talking in IRC I thought it'll be a waste to create a whole -devel package for this file, I think it's unecessary. Feel free to comment about this. If it's really necessary, I'll split the package right away! ;) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 20 03:06:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 23:06:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192491] New: Review Request: python-vorbis - A Python wrapper for the Ogg Vorbis audio libraries Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192491 Summary: Review Request: python-vorbis - A Python wrapper for the Ogg Vorbis audio libraries Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: hugo at devin.com.br QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.devin.com.br/eitch/rpm/fedora/SPECS/python-vorbis.spec SRPM URL: http://www.devin.com.br/eitch/rpm/fedora/5/SRPMS/python-vorbis-1.3-1.src.rpm Description: An object-oriented Python binding for the Ogg Vorbis libraries. Ogg is a multimedia bitstream format. With this you can write your own python applications to play and encode audio files in Ogg Vorbis format. Note: This requires the python-ogg library to build. Check Bug #192490. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 20 03:08:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 23:08:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192491] Review Request: python-vorbis - A Python wrapper for the Ogg Vorbis audio libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605200308.k4K38RP6019261@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-vorbis - A Python wrapper for the Ogg Vorbis audio libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192491 hugo at devin.com.br changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |192490 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 20 03:08:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 23:08:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192490] Review Request: python-ogg - A Python wrapper for the Ogg libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605200308.k4K38cEb019287@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-ogg - A Python wrapper for the Ogg libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192490 hugo at devin.com.br changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |192491 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 20 04:20:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 May 2006 00:20:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191604] Review Request: lineakd - linux easy-access-key daemon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605200420.k4K4KL3i001477@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lineakd - linux easy-access-key daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191604 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |tibbs at math.uh.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-05-20 00:19 EST ------- Issues: The source file in your SRPM is mode 664; it should be 644. Probably doesn't matter when you check in, but you might want to fix it anyway. Your Source: URL just gives HTML. You should use dl.sf.net instead of prdownloads.sf.net. Needs these just to build: BuildRequires: libXext-devel BuildRequires: libXt-devel Once built, rpmlint complains: E: lineakd postin-without-ldconfig /usr/lib64/liblineak.so.0.8.0 E: lineakd postun-without-ldconfig /usr/lib64/liblineak.so.0.8.0 E: lineakd non-empty-%post /sbin/ldconfig W: lineakd one-line-command-in-%post ################################################################################ E: lineakd non-empty-%postun /sbin/ldconfig W: lineakd one-line-command-in-%postun ################################################################################ W: lineakd-devel no-documentation Most of this goes away if you remove your separator comments. I don't know if rpmlint has a valid complaint here or not but I admit that I've not seen that style of commenting in a specfile before. What remains is the lack of documentation in lineak-devel, which I believe is a bogus warning. Review: * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible; license text is included in the package. * source files match upstream: 8f0b4c38c3a46bfd2613e371e8fd2440 lineakd-0.8.4.tar.gz 8f0b4c38c3a46bfd2613e371e8fd2440 lineakd-0.8.4.tar.gz-srpm * latest version is being packaged. X BuildRequires are proper (missing two; see above) O package builds in mock (development, x86_64) after fixing BuildRequires: X rpmlint has some complaints. * final provides and requires are sane. * shared libraries are present; ldconfig is run as necessary. Unversioned .so files are in the -devel package. * package is not relocatable. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * %clean is present. * %check is not present; no test suite upstream. X scriptlets present and sane, but the comments seem to cause problems. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * headers present and in a -devel package. * no pkgconfig files. * no libtool .la droppings. * not a GUI app. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 20 04:29:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 May 2006 00:29:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 182064] Review Request: facter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605200429.k4K4TmTd002973@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: facter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=182064 jpmahowald at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2006-05-20 00:29 EST ------- Building for FC5 works, on FC5. So the review: - rpmlint checks return: E: facter no-binary E: facter only-non-binary-in-usr-lib because of the mentioned bug 184199 - package meets naming guidelines - package meets packaging guidelines - license (GPL) OK, text in %doc, matches source - spec file legible, in am. english - source matches upstream - package compiles on FC5 (x86_64) - no missing BR - no unnecessary BR - no locales - not relocatable - owns all directories that it creates - no duplicate files - permissions ok - %clean ok - macro use consistent - code, not content - no need for -docs - nothing in %doc affects runtime - no need for .desktop file APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 20 05:02:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 May 2006 01:02:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 176374] Review Request: nagios-plugins In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605200502.k4K52xBR008775@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nagios-plugins https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176374 ------- Additional Comments From imlinux at gmail.com 2006-05-20 01:02 EST ------- SPEC: http://mmcgrath.net/~mmcgrath/nagios/nagios-plugins.spec SRPM: http://mmcgrath.net/~mmcgrath/nagios/nagios-plugins-1.4.3-3.src.rpm Changelog: - Added check_ide_smart - Added some dependencies - Added support for check_if* (perl-Net-SNMP now in extras) - nagios-plugins now owns dir %{_libdir}/nagios -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 20 05:26:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 May 2006 01:26:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188574] Review Request: rss-glx -- Really Slick Screensavers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605200526.k4K5Qhqh012323@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rss-glx -- Really Slick Screensavers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188574 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|fedora-extras- |fedora-package- |list at redhat.com |review at redhat.com tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tibbs at math.uh.edu ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-05-20 01:26 EST ------- I figured this could use a little attention, so here are some comments: Could you provide a script to generate your patched source tarball from upstream's? Might it be possible to include the matrixview hack but replace the images with, I don't know, the Fedora logo and pictures of Seth or something? Or even nothing; it only uses the compiled-in images if the user doesn't specify a directory containing images. The package builds in mock (development, x86_64) but rpmlint finds quite a bit to complain about. I'll group the complaints by type: W: rss-glx no-version-in-last-changelog W: rss-glx-debuginfo no-version-in-last-changelog W: rss-glx-gnome-screensaver no-version-in-last-changelog W: rss-glx-kde no-version-in-last-changelog W: rss-glx-xscreensaver no-version-in-last-changelog Many of your changelog entries don't include version information. E: rss-glx obsolete-not-provided rss_glx If you obsolete something, you must also provide it. E: rss-glx zero-length /usr/share/doc/rss-glx-0.8.1/NEWS E: rss-glx zero-length /usr/share/doc/rss-glx-0.8.1/AUTHORS No point in packaging these. W: rss-glx-debuginfo dangling-relative-symlink /usr/src/debug/rss-glx_0.8.1.p/oglc_src/driver.cpp ../src/driver.cpp W: rss-glx-debuginfo dangling-relative-symlink /usr/src/debug/rss-glx_0.8.1.p/other_src/driver.c ../src/driver.cpp W: rss-glx-debuginfo dangling-relative-symlink /usr/src/debug/rss-glx_0.8.1.p/reallyslick/cpp_src/driver.cpp ../../src/driver.cpp W: rss-glx-debuginfo dangling-relative-symlink /usr/src/debug/rss-glx_0.8.1.p/reallyslick/c_src/driver.c ../../src/driver.cpp These all seem to be bogus. W: rss-glx-gnome-screensaver no-documentation W: rss-glx-kde no-documentation W: rss-glx-xscreensaver no-documentation Definitely bogus. A large number of warnings like this: W: rss-glx-gnome-screensaver dangling-symlink /usr/libexec/gnome-screensaver/rss-glx-cyclone /usr/bin/cyclone rpmlint is smart enough to ignore symlinks to files in required packages when those symlinks are in -devel packages, but not in this case. These can all be ignored. W: rss-glx-gnome-screensaver non-standard-dir-in-usr libexec I was recently informed on IRC that /usr/libexec is not discouraged in Fedora, so I don't understand this warning at all. I'll do a full review tomorrow. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 20 06:14:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 May 2006 02:14:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192413] libdhcp : IPv6 and IPv4 DHCP client and network configuration library API In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605200614.k4K6Eh7H020251@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: libdhcp : IPv6 and IPv4 DHCP client and network configuration library API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192413 ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-05-20 02:14 EST ------- Elvis and Devel CVS aren't accessable to outside people who may be doing the review (; This is why they should be made downloadable in the bug report. The explicit requires thing, rpm will use ldd to figure out what it actually should require. This most often works better than hand defining a requires, and thats what rpmlint was complaining about. I'll test new packages in the morning. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 20 06:29:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 May 2006 02:29:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189656] Review Request: lilypond - A typesetting system for music notation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605200629.k4K6T8R7022240@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lilypond - A typesetting system for music notation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189656 ------- Additional Comments From qspencer at ieee.org 2006-05-20 02:28 EST ------- I've decided to go ahead and create a lilypond-doc package, since upstream maintains provides a tarball for it. Review request coming soon... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 20 06:36:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 May 2006 02:36:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192502] New: Review Request: lilypond-doc - HTML documentation for lilypond Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192502 Summary: Review Request: lilypond-doc - HTML documentation for lilypond Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: qspencer at ieee.org QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://qspencer.homeip.net/rpm/lilypond-doc-2.8.3-1.src.rpm SRPM URL: http://qspencer.homeip.net/rpm/lilypond-doc.spec Description: This package contains extensive HTML documentation for lilypond. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 20 06:55:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 May 2006 02:55:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191452] Review Request: orpie - scientific calculator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605200655.k4K6t6ir027395@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: orpie - scientific calculator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191452 ------- Additional Comments From gauret at free.fr 2006-05-20 02:54 EST ------- The only change is the release bump and the removal of BuildRequires: ocaml, so release 3 is still APPROVED. You can go ahead and import, good work. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 20 07:07:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 May 2006 03:07:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191604] Review Request: lineakd - linux easy-access-key daemon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605200707.k4K778B4029155@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lineakd - linux easy-access-key daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191604 ------- Additional Comments From lists at forevermore.net 2006-05-20 03:07 EST ------- Spec URL: http://forevermore.net/files/packages/lineak/lineakd.spec SRPM URL: http://forevermore.net/files/packages/lineak/lineakd-0.8.4-2.src.rpm - Added missing build requires. - Added AUTHORS and COPYING to -devel, just for good measure. - Fixed %post/un script to not cause errors. - Fix download URL As for the commenting, it's mainly just a pattern I picked up when managing huge specs -- makes it a lot easier to separate sections visually, and appears only to cause problems when using the -p option for %post/un. Something's definitely wrong with the comment stuff, though. Even looks like it extends beyond rpmlint, since as I was playing with the specs, it looks like the problem extends to rpm itself, which is why I got rid of the -p notation (which fixes the problem). I created a bug to pass along the info: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192506 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 20 07:09:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 May 2006 03:09:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191605] Review Request: lineak_defaultplugin - default actions for lineakd In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605200709.k4K79OP3029568@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lineak_defaultplugin - default actions for lineakd https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191605 ------- Additional Comments From lists at forevermore.net 2006-05-20 03:09 EST ------- SRPM URL: http://forevermore.net/files/packages/lineak/lineak_defaultplugin-0.8.4-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 20 07:09:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 May 2006 03:09:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191606] Review Request: lineak_kdeplugins - KDE-based actions for lineakd In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605200709.k4K79kGG029614@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lineak_kdeplugins - KDE-based actions for lineakd https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191606 ------- Additional Comments From lists at forevermore.net 2006-05-20 03:09 EST ------- SRPM URL: http://forevermore.net/files/packages/lineak/lineak_kdeplugins-0.8.4-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 20 07:09:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 May 2006 03:09:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191607] Review Request: lineak_xosdplugin - Onscreen display support for lineakd In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605200709.k4K79sZl029624@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lineak_xosdplugin - Onscreen display support for lineakd https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191607 ------- Additional Comments From lists at forevermore.net 2006-05-20 03:09 EST ------- SRPM URL: http://forevermore.net/files/packages/lineak/lineak_xosdplugin-0.8.4-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 20 07:19:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 May 2006 03:19:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192413] libdhcp : IPv6 and IPv4 DHCP client and network configuration library API In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605200719.k4K7JROJ031541@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: libdhcp : IPv6 and IPv4 DHCP client and network configuration library API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192413 ------- Additional Comments From bugs.michael at gmx.net 2006-05-20 03:19 EST ------- > About the devel package dep - in the current .spec file, it says: > > %package devel > ... > Requires: %{name}-%{version}-%{release} Which would be clearly wrong, because you need: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} > About the "explicit-lib-dependency" - yes, libdhcp does require the > libdhcp4client and libdhcp6client libraries - it cannot be used at all > without them, so I thought they should be in its list of 'Requires:' You ought to check whether rpmbuild creates dependencies on the library SONAMEs automatically. Query "rpm -qpR yourbinary.rpm", and if it does, don't add explicit dependencies on package names. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 20 08:08:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 May 2006 04:08:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 165311] Review Request: Tiger, security auditing on UNIX systems In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605200808.k4K87xhe010523@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Tiger, security auditing on UNIX systems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=165311 gauret at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 20 08:56:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 May 2006 04:56:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192524] New: Review Request: knemo - A KDE network monitoring tool Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192524 Summary: Review Request: knemo - A KDE network monitoring tool Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: hugo at devin.com.br QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.devin.com.br/eitch/rpm/fedora/SPECS/knemo.spec SRPM URL: http://www.devin.com.br/eitch/rpm/fedora/5/SRPMS/knemo-0.4.0-1.src.rpm Description: KNemo displays for every network interface an icon in the systray. Tooltips and an info dialog provide further information about the interface. Passive popups inform about interface changes. A traffic plotter is also integrated. It polls the network interface status every second using the ifconfig, route and iwconfig tools. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 20 09:05:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 May 2006 05:05:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 176580] Review Request: x11-ssh-askpass -- the cool brother of gnome-ssh-askpass In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605200905.k4K95cw6023551@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: x11-ssh-askpass -- the cool brother of gnome-ssh-askpass https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176580 ------- Additional Comments From enrico.scholz at informatik.tu-chemnitz.de 2006-05-20 05:05 EST ------- * Sat May 20 2006 Enrico Scholz - 1.2.4.1-0.2 - removed '%config' from the app-defaultsdir - do not own the app-defaultsdir anymore - added some tricks to the -random patch to avoid removal of the clear-the-passphrase-memset() due to optimization http://ensc.de/fedora/x11-ssh-askpass.spec http://ensc.de/fedora/x11-ssh-askpass-1.2.4.1-0.2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 20 09:07:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 May 2006 05:07:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190156] Review Request: php-pear-HTTP In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605200907.k4K973gZ023845@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-HTTP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190156 gauret at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |gauret at free.fr OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From gauret at free.fr 2006-05-20 05:06 EST ------- Needs work: * don't remove the buildroot in %prep (it breaks rpmbuild -bi --short-circuit) * do the sanity check in %check * it would be nice to add "|| :" at the end of the pear lines in the scriptlets, to make sure they won't return a failure and block the whole rpm transaction Minor: * Use "BuildArch:" instead of the full BuildArchitectures * Include the LICENCE as you did with php-pear-Mail. This is not a requirement though (it would be if the tarball shipped the license, which is not the case here) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 20 09:34:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 May 2006 05:34:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 173459] Review Request: initng In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605200934.k4K9YoGe029725@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 ------- Additional Comments From enrico.scholz at informatik.tu-chemnitz.de 2006-05-20 05:34 EST ------- Blockers: 1. core package contains development files (*.so); write | %files | ... | /%{_lib}/lib*.so.* | %files devel | ... | /%{_lib}/lib*.so 2. the | if [ -n "`ps -e|grep initng`" ]; then | /sbin/ngc --quiet -c >/dev/null 2>&1 | fi in %post is a) ugly b) has missing Requires(post): grep procps c) contains one of the worst constructs in %scriptlets: | cmd 2>/dev/null which makes scriptlets fail silently without giving user a hint about the reason d) wrong because it will take non-init initngs into account The construct above should be replaced by | Requires(post): procps | ... | init=$(ps --no-headers -o '%%c' 1) | test x"$init" != xinitng || /sbin/ngc --quiet -c || : Comments: 1. For bootstrapping in Extras, you can omit the | Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} in -devel. Alternatively (I would prefer that), you should create a '-lib' subpackage with only the libraries and require this subpackage by -devel. 2. the | if [ -x /usr/sbin/semanage ]; then | /usr/sbin/semanage fcontext -a -t init_exec_t /sbin/initng 2>/dev/null || : | fi can be expressed shorter as | /usr/sbin/semanage fcontext -a -t init_exec_t /sbin/initng 2>/dev/null || : -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 20 09:42:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 May 2006 05:42:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 173459] Review Request: initng In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605200942.k4K9gYuO031220@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 ------- Additional Comments From enrico.scholz at informatik.tu-chemnitz.de 2006-05-20 05:42 EST ------- Forgot: when following the -lib suggestion you should prevent version mix either by: | Requires: %name-lib = %version-%release in main; or by | Conflicts: %name < %version-%release | Conflicts: %name > %version-%release in -lib. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 20 10:02:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 May 2006 06:02:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192540] New: Review Request: cal3d - A skeletal based 3-D character animation library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192540 Summary: Review Request: cal3d - A skeletal based 3-D character animation library Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: chris.stone at gmail.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://tkmame.retrogames.com/fedora-extras/cal3d.spec SRPM URL: http://tkmame.retrogames.com/fedora-extras/cal3d-0.10.0-1.src.rpm *** NOTE *** You may have to download the src rpm from http://tkmame.retrogames.com/fedora-extras/cal3d-0.10.0-1.src.rpm Description: Cal3d is a skeletal based 3-D character animation library written in C++ in a platform-/graphic API-independent way. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 20 11:02:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 May 2006 07:02:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 185951] Review Request: amsn : msn messenger clone In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605201102.k4KB2phf016218@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: amsn : msn messenger clone https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=185951 ------- Additional Comments From tjikkun at xs4all.nl 2006-05-20 07:02 EST ------- (In reply to comment #14) > It also includes a copy of the BWidget tcl package, which I've already packaged > for FE. Just add "Requires: bwidget" and don't include the local copy. The one that is used by amsn is modified, amsn won't work with the original one. (In reply to comment #15) > (In reply to comment #13) > > amsn builds against local copies of libpng, libjpeg, and zlib, which is a no-no > > for Fedora Extras. This must be changed to build against the system copies. > > You don't have to remove them from the sources, just make sure it links against > > the existing libpng/libjpeg/zlib, and add "BuildRequires: libpng-devel > > libjpeg-devel zlib-devel" > > I had a similar issue to this with gtkwave, which bundles zlib and bzip2. I made > absolutely sure that the system libraries were used by not only patching the > Makefiles but deleting the bundled libraries from the unpacked sources in %prep > so that there was no possibility of building and linking against them. Done, see: http://amsn.hoentjen.eu/download/amsn.spec http://amsn.hoentjen.eu/download/amsn-0.96-0.6.20060517svn.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 20 11:21:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 May 2006 07:21:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 173459] Review Request: initng In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605201121.k4KBL4oF020024@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 daner964 at student.liu.se changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #129586|0 |1 is obsolete| | ------- Additional Comments From daner964 at student.liu.se 2006-05-20 07:21 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=129723) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=129723&action=view) initng 0.6.7-2 spec file (In reply to comment #290) > 1. core package contains development files (*.so); write Did I get you right now? > | Requires(post): procps > | ... > | init=$(ps --no-headers -o '%%c' 1) > | test x"$init" != xinitng || /sbin/ngc --quiet -c || : Thanks! That's a lot nicer! > in -devel. Alternatively (I would prefer that), you should create a > '-lib' subpackage with only the libraries and require this subpackage > by -devel. Something like this? > 2. the > > | if [ -x /usr/sbin/semanage ]; then > | /usr/sbin/semanage fcontext -a -t init_exec_t /sbin/initng 2>/dev/null || : > | fi > > can be expressed shorter as > > | /usr/sbin/semanage fcontext -a -t init_exec_t /sbin/initng 2>/dev/null || : Ok. The check was introduced since you pointed out that semanage doesn't exist in FC4... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 20 11:36:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 May 2006 07:36:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192546] New: Review Request: gnubiff Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192546 Summary: Review Request: gnubiff Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: splinux at fedoraproject.org QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://glive.tuxfamily.org/fedora/gnubiff/gnubiff.spec SRPM URL: http://glive.tuxfamily.org/fedora/gnubiff/gnubiff-2.2.0-1.fc6.src.rpm Description: Gnubiff is a mail notification program that periodically checks for mail and displays headers when new mail has arrived -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 20 12:12:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 May 2006 08:12:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192490] Review Request: python-ogg - A Python wrapper for the Ogg libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605201212.k4KCCfEL029287@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-ogg - A Python wrapper for the Ogg libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192490 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-05-20 08:12 EST ------- Hugo, Good to see you're packing more stuff for FE I'm glad I sponsored you. I'll try to review this for you, but I'm currently a bit busy. So this is as time permits. Because of this I'm not assigning this bug to myself untill I actually start the review, to give other reviewers a chance to beat me to it :) (Once a bug is assigned the person who has assigned the bug to himself is supposed todo the review) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 20 12:12:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 May 2006 08:12:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192491] Review Request: python-vorbis - A Python wrapper for the Ogg Vorbis audio libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605201212.k4KCCnuS029345@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-vorbis - A Python wrapper for the Ogg Vorbis audio libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192491 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-05-20 08:12 EST ------- Hugo, Good to see you're packing more stuff for FE I'm glad I sponsored you. I'll try to review this for you, but I'm currently a bit busy. So this is as time permits. Because of this I'm not assigning this bug to myself untill I actually start the review, to give other reviewers a chance to beat me to it :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 20 12:13:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 May 2006 08:13:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192524] Review Request: knemo - A KDE network monitoring tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605201213.k4KCDmhA029537@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: knemo - A KDE network monitoring tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192524 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-05-20 08:13 EST ------- Hugo, Good to see you're packing more stuff for FE I'm glad I sponsored you. I'll try to review this for you, but I'm currently a bit busy. So this is as time permits. Because of this I'm not assigning this bug to myself untill I actually start the review, to give other reviewers a chance to beat me to it :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 20 12:52:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 May 2006 08:52:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192524] Review Request: knemo - A KDE network monitoring tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605201252.k4KCqZqQ003892@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: knemo - A KDE network monitoring tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192524 fedora.wickert at arcor.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE ------- Additional Comments From fedora.wickert at arcor.de 2006-05-20 08:52 EST ------- We already have another review for knemo, Richard June came up with this package 5 weeks ago. I suggest you try to get in contact with him to decide who's going to do this package. If Richard doesn't want to maintain it feel free to reopen this review. Please take a look at bug #163776 before you start packaging something. BTW: Do not include *.la-files, see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-2302ec1e1f44202c9cc4bcce24cb711266557ad7 *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 189088 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 20 12:52:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 May 2006 08:52:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189088] Review Request: knemo Network monitor applet. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605201252.k4KCqvhh003988@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: knemo Network monitor applet. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189088 fedora.wickert at arcor.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |hugo at devin.com.br ------- Additional Comments From fedora.wickert at arcor.de 2006-05-20 08:52 EST ------- *** Bug 192524 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 20 13:37:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 May 2006 09:37:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192144] Review Request: musicbox In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605201337.k4KDbEEx011334@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: musicbox https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192144 ------- Additional Comments From splinux at fedoraproject.org 2006-05-20 09:36 EST ------- New spec file and srpm are here: http://glive.tuxfamily.org/fedora/musicbox/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 20 13:38:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 May 2006 09:38:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192546] Review Request: gnubiff In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605201338.k4KDcRu4011643@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnubiff https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192546 bdpepple at ameritech.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |bdpepple at ameritech.net OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 20 14:00:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 May 2006 10:00:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192436] Review Request: xorg-x11-server-Xgl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605201400.k4KE0Ij4015444@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xorg-x11-server-Xgl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192436 ------- Additional Comments From alcapcom at gmail.com 2006-05-20 10:00 EST ------- Hi Rudolf, The problem comes from the mesa version, the current version on FC5 does not contain bitset.h header file. There must be an error with the build of mesa in the package. ps: I think that the patch must be correct, another persons that me, have build it for X86_64 and they haven't give any feedback about that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 20 14:01:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 May 2006 10:01:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 173459] Review Request: initng In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605201401.k4KE1ucu015719@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 ------- Additional Comments From che666 at gmail.com 2006-05-20 10:01 EST ------- #289 i have to correct myself. id suggets building it with: cmake . -DBUILD_SELINUX:BOOL=ON -DCOUNT_ME:BOOL=OFF -DCMAKE_SKIP_RPATH:BOOL=ON -DLIB_INSTALL_DIR:STRING=/%{_lib} -DCMAKE_C_FLAGS:STRING='%{optflags}' make %{?_smp_mflags} VERBOSE=1 without the explcit setting its getting built 32 bit on x86_64 and the default optflags should be used anyways to build it. VERBOSE=1 with the make line will print the real output of the build. its contraproductive to hide that because you cant see if its building right. a hardcoded path makes a plugin yet segfault on x86_64 will be fixed in svn soon. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 20 14:06:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 May 2006 10:06:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192524] Review Request: knemo - A KDE network monitoring tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605201406.k4KE64a7016603@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: knemo - A KDE network monitoring tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192524 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 20 14:09:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 May 2006 10:09:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187625] Review Request: ices IceS is a source client for a streaming server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605201409.k4KE9Ksv017153@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ices IceS is a source client for a streaming server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187625 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 20 14:42:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 May 2006 10:42:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192432] Review Request: compiz In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605201442.k4KEgxsK023666@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compiz https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192432 ------- Additional Comments From alcapcom at gmail.com 2006-05-20 10:42 EST ------- Hi Rudolf, It's the same mesa version problem which that of xgl. cf. bugid https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192436 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 20 14:58:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 May 2006 10:58:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188180] Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605201458.k4KEwN5m026185@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188180 laurent.rineau__fc_extra at normalesup.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #127786|0 |1 is obsolete| | Attachment #128986|0 |1 is obsolete| | Attachment #129058|0 |1 is obsolete| | ------- Additional Comments From laurent.rineau__fc_extra at normalesup.org 2006-05-20 10:58 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=129744) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=129744&action=view) Patch for qt4-4.1.3-1.spec (lib?vs.?%{_libs} + owning of directories by subpackages) There was a "*/lib" left. And %{qtdir}/plugins/ and %{qtdir}/{_lib}/ should be owned by subpackages that install things in too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 20 15:00:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 May 2006 11:00:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 176374] Review Request: nagios-plugins In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605201500.k4KF0EPD026454@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nagios-plugins https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176374 jpo at di.uminho.pt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jpo at di.uminho.pt 2006-05-20 11:00 EST ------- Changing FE-NEW to FE-REVIEW. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 20 15:10:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 May 2006 11:10:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 173459] Review Request: initng In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605201510.k4KFAgvD028105@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 ------- Additional Comments From enrico.scholz at informatik.tu-chemnitz.de 2006-05-20 11:10 EST ------- > > 1. core package contains development files (*.so); write > Did I get you right now? sorry, not completely ;) * you should add | %post lib -p /sbin/ldconfig | %postun lib -p /sbin/ldconfig and remove the /sbin/ldconfig from main's %scriptlets * I am not sure about the plugins (/%{_lib}/initng); I would see them as part of the main-package and would not ship them in -lib. Beside the devel-ifiles chicken-egg problem, the purpose of -lib is to avoid heavy dependencies e.g. for GUIs which are using the initng ifiles-parser. > > | if [ -x /usr/sbin/semanage ]; then > > | /usr/sbin/semanage fcontext -a -t init_exec_t /sbin/initng 2>/dev/null || : > > | fi > > > > can be expressed shorter as > > > > | /usr/sbin/semanage fcontext -a -t init_exec_t /sbin/initng 2>/dev/null || : > > Ok. The check was introduced since you pointed out that semanage doesn't exist > in FC4... My comment #239 was about a | /usr/sbin/semanage fcontext -a -t init_exec_t /sbin/initng statement *without* the trailing '|| :' Current spec is ok regarding this issue. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 20 15:15:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 May 2006 11:15:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188180] Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605201515.k4KFFson029010@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188180 laurent.rineau__fc_extra at normalesup.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #129744|0 |1 is obsolete| | ------- Additional Comments From laurent.rineau__fc_extra at normalesup.org 2006-05-20 11:15 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=129745) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=129745&action=view) (updated) Patch for qt4-4.1.3-1.spec (lib vs. %{_libs} + owning of directories by subpackages) I forgot to own %{qtdir} itself, in subpackages. The patch attached is for qt4-4.1.3-1.spec. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 20 15:16:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 May 2006 11:16:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 176374] Review Request: nagios-plugins In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605201516.k4KFGifb029232@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nagios-plugins https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176374 ------- Additional Comments From jpo at di.uminho.pt 2006-05-20 11:16 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=129746) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=129746&action=view) Inherit distro CFLAGS Mike, This patch does the following: * [Blocker] Makes the package use the distro CFLAGS Most of the plugins weren't being compiled with the distro CFLAGS. Using the %configure macro takes care of that. * Adds perl(Net::SNMP) to the build requirements One less warning message from the configure. Suggestion: Could you also add the bugzilla ticket to one of the changelog entries? Hopefully these will be the last corrections. jpo -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 20 15:27:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 May 2006 11:27:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190156] Review Request: php-pear-HTTP In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605201527.k4KFRfAE030893@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-HTTP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190156 ------- Additional Comments From Fedora at FamilleCollet.com 2006-05-20 11:27 EST ------- Spec URL: http://remi.collet.free.fr/rpms/extras/php-pear-HTTP.spec SRPM URL: http://remi.collet.free.fr/rpms/extras/php-pear-HTTP-1.4.0-3.fc5.src.rpm Mock Build.log : http://remi.collet.free.fr/rpms/extras/php-pear-HTTP-build.log - Require pear >= 1.4.9 - bundle the v3.01 PHP LICENSE file - use --packagingroot (instead of -R) - move check from install to check -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 20 15:34:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 May 2006 11:34:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192502] Review Request: lilypond-doc - HTML documentation for lilypond In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605201534.k4KFYOkC032571@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lilypond-doc - HTML documentation for lilypond https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192502 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |tibbs at math.uh.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-05-20 11:34 EST ------- Since this is just a doc package, a quick review should suffice: * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * source files match upstream: 45622b94aba72994277d6a0d4fcf706c lilypond-2.8.3-1.documentation.tar.bz2 45622b94aba72994277d6a0d4fcf706c lilypond-2.8.3-1.documentation.tar.bz2-srpm * latest version is being packaged. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * rpmlint is silent. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * %clean is present. Note: code-not-content rule does not apply as this is merely documentation for a package already in extras, placed in a separate package so that it can be non-arch-specific. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 20 15:51:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 May 2006 11:51:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190956] Review Request: php-pear-Auth-SASL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605201551.k4KFplP8003695@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Auth-SASL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190956 ------- Additional Comments From Fedora at FamilleCollet.com 2006-05-20 11:51 EST ------- Spec URL: http://remi.collet.free.fr/rpms/extras/php-pear-Auth-SASL.spec SRPM URL: http://remi.collet.free.fr/rpms/extras/php-pear-Auth-SASL-1.0.1-2.fc5.src.rpm Mock build.log : http://remi.collet.free.fr/rpms/extras/php-pear-Auth-SASL-build.log -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 20 15:53:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 May 2006 11:53:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190156] Review Request: php-pear-HTTP In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605201553.k4KFrcGi004006@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-HTTP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190156 gauret at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From gauret at free.fr 2006-05-20 11:53 EST ------- Review for release 3: * RPM name is OK * Source HTTP-1.4.0.tgz is the same as upstream * Builds fine in mock * rpmlint looks OK * File list looks OK * Works fine APPROVED Note : The line "%{__install} -m 644 -c %{SOURCE1} LICENSE" is more usually found in %prep, but that's not a blocker. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 20 15:57:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 May 2006 11:57:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192540] Review Request: cal3d - A skeletal based 3-D character animation library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605201557.k4KFvV5v004690@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cal3d - A skeletal based 3-D character animation library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192540 ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2006-05-20 11:57 EST ------- oops, I meant to say above: *** NOTE *** You may have to download the src rpm from http://tkmame.retrogames.com/fedora-extras/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 20 16:06:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 May 2006 12:06:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188180] Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605201606.k4KG64hR006116@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188180 ------- Additional Comments From laurent.rineau__fc_extra at normalesup.org 2006-05-20 12:05 EST ------- Some pkgconfig files refere to "-lQtGui64". I do not understand. Here they are: /usr/lib64/qt4/lib64/Qt3Support.pc /usr/lib64/qt4/lib64/QtGui.pc /usr/lib64/qt4/lib64/QtSvg.pc /usr/lib64/qt4/lib64/QtOpenGL.pc referes to "-lQtOpenGL64". "ld?-lQtGui64" gives an error. Some .prl files have errors too... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 20 16:17:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 May 2006 12:17:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190957] Review Request: php-pear-Net-Socket In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605201617.k4KGHVn6007908@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Net-Socket https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190957 ------- Additional Comments From Fedora at FamilleCollet.com 2006-05-20 12:17 EST ------- Spec URL: http://remi.collet.free.fr/rpms/extras/php-pear-Net-Socket.spec SRPM URL: http://remi.collet.free.fr/rpms/extras/php-pear-Net-Socket-1.0.6-2.fc5.src.rpm Mock build.log : http://remi.collet.free.fr/rpms/extras/php-pear-Net-Socket-build.log -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 20 16:24:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 May 2006 12:24:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192540] Review Request: cal3d - A skeletal based 3-D character animation library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605201624.k4KGORGN009107@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cal3d - A skeletal based 3-D character animation library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192540 ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2006-05-20 12:24 EST ------- Spec URL: http://tkmame.retrogames.com/fedora-extras/cal3d.spec SRPM URL: http://tkmame.retrogames.com/fedora-extras/cal3d-0.10.0-2.src.rpm *** NOTE *** You may have to download the src rpm from: http://tkmame.retrogames.com/fedora-extras/ %changelog * Sun May 21 2006 Christopher Stone 0.10.0-2 - Move some devel documentation into doc package -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 20 16:49:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 May 2006 12:49:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192546] Review Request: gnubiff In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605201649.k4KGn1R9013998@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnubiff https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192546 gauret at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |gauret at free.fr ------- Additional Comments From gauret at free.fr 2006-05-20 12:48 EST ------- Brian, are you reviewing this package ? Anyway here's my take at it (can't harm to have more people for review) Needs work: * BuildRequires: gettext is missing (required by the %find_lang macro) * /usr/share/info/dir is already owned by info, don't own it (put %{_datadir}/info/*.info.gz in %files for example) * Scriptlets: missing "install-info" in %post and %preun (in the wiki: ScriptletSnippets) Minor: * Version and Source1 are not properly lined-up (tabs instead of spaces) * Duplicate BuildRequires: gtk2-devel (by libglade2-devel) * At the end of ./configure, there is "Gnome support: no". Is that what you want ? From http://gnubiff.sourceforge.net, GNOME support could be useful. Perhaps a missing "BuildRequires: gnome-panel-devel" only ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 20 16:50:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 May 2006 12:50:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190958] Review Request: php-pear-Net-SMTP In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605201650.k4KGoqvf014217@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Net-SMTP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190958 ------- Additional Comments From Fedora at FamilleCollet.com 2006-05-20 12:50 EST ------- Spec URL: http://remi.collet.free.fr/rpms/extras/php-pear-Net-SMTP.spec SRPM URL: http://remi.collet.free.fr/rpms/extras/php-pear-Net-SMTP-1.2.8-2.fc5.src.rpm Mock build.log : http://remi.collet.free.fr/rpms/extras/php-pear-Net-SMTP-build.log -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 20 16:54:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 May 2006 12:54:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188180] Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605201654.k4KGskID014918@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188180 laurent.rineau__fc_extra at normalesup.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #129745|0 |1 is obsolete| | ------- Additional Comments From laurent.rineau__fc_extra at normalesup.org 2006-05-20 12:54 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=129761) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=129761&action=view) (v3) Patch for qt4-4.1.3-1.spec (lib vs. %{_libs} + owning of directories by subpackages) I found the bug of comment #109: when sed removes " -L/usr/X11R6/lib", on x86_64, it leaves "64". :-( I hope this is the last "lib64" issue. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 20 17:30:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 May 2006 13:30:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189088] Review Request: knemo Network monitor applet. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605201730.k4KHU4AB020072@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: knemo Network monitor applet. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189088 gauret at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |gauret at free.fr OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From gauret at free.fr 2006-05-20 13:29 EST ------- Needs work: * No downloadable source. Please give the full URL in the Source tag. * Desktop file: vendor should be fedora (wiki: PackagingGuidelines#desktop) * Desktop file: the Categories tag should contain Application and X-Fedora (wiki: PackagingGuidelines#desktop) * The translation files are not properly tagged, use the %find_lang macro (wiki: Packaging/ReviewGuidelines) * Scriptlets: missing "gtk-update-icon-cache" in %post and %postun (wiki: ScriptletSnippets) * Don't rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT in %prep, it breaks rpm -qi --short-circuit * The "-n %{name}-%{version}" part in %setup is useless, it's already the default * export QTDIR=/usr/lib/qt-3.3/ should be replaced by: unset QTDIR && . %{_sysconfdir}/profile.d/qt.sh export QTLIB=${QTDIR}/lib QTINC=${QTDIR}/include and it should be moved at the top of %build * %configure should be moved in %build * The BuildRoot must be cleaned at the beginning of %install * Use make install, not make install-strip. RPM will strip the binaries by itself * INSTALL is useless as a %doc, we're using RPM. * %{_datadir}/*/*/*/* is a too generic, use %{_datadir}/icons/*/*/*/*.png * The directory /usr/share/apps/knemo/ should be owned by the package -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 20 17:32:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 May 2006 13:32:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192144] Review Request: musicbox In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605201732.k4KHWvU0020697@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: musicbox https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192144 bdpepple at ameritech.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at ameritech.net 2006-05-20 13:32 EST ------- MD5Sums: 03f9eb2c446debd1e187d472c05dcad8 musicbox-0.2.3.tar.gz Good: * Source URL is canonical * Upstream source tarball verified * Package name conforms to the Fedora Naming Guide * Group Tag is from the official list * Buildroot has all required elements * All paths begin with macros * Desktop entry is fine * All directories are owned by this or other packages * All necessary BuildRequires listed. * All desired features are enabled * rpmlint produces no errors. * Builds fine in mock. Minor: * Unnecessary BuildRequirement: gtk2-devel (provided by libglade2-devel) * Don't package INSTALL doc, since it's the generic GNU file. You can fix the 2 minor issues when you import it into FE CVS. +1 APPROVE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 20 17:52:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 May 2006 13:52:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188180] Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605201752.k4KHqECW023510@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188180 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-05-20 13:52 EST ------- Thanks. Spec Name or Url: http://kde-redhat.unl.edu/apt/kde-redhat/SPECS/qt4-4.1.3-2.spec SRPM Name or Url: http://kde-redhat.unl.edu/apt/kde-redhat/all/SRPMS.stable/qt4-4.1.3-2.src.rpm %changelog * Sat May 20 2006 Rex Dieter 4.1.3-2 - -mysql: use mysql_config for setting cflags/ldflags. - -mysql: BR: mysql-devel > 4.0 * Sat May 20 2006 Laurent Rineau - Fix the last reference to %{qtdir}/lib: use %{_lib} instead of "lib". - Fix the ownership of subpackages: they need to own parents of directories they install files in. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 20 17:56:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 May 2006 13:56:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191604] Review Request: lineakd - linux easy-access-key daemon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605201756.k4KHu2xa024297@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lineakd - linux easy-access-key daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191604 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-05-20 13:55 EST ------- Unfortunately because you're not using the %post -p /sbin/ldconfig method, RPM will not automatically generate the Requires(post): /sbin/ldconfig dependency so you must add it manually. Also, you now have duplicates in %files. The no-documentation warning for lineakd-devel was bogus; there was no reason to try to fix it. X final provides and requires are sane. X no duplicates in %files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 20 18:22:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 May 2006 14:22:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188180] Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605201822.k4KIMEWb029066@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188180 ------- Additional Comments From laurent.rineau__fedora_extras at normalesup.org 2006-05-20 14:21 EST ------- qt4-4.1.3-2.spec fails to build, on x86_64: the configure line is: ./configure -v -no-rpath -prefix /usr/lib64/qt4 -libdir /usr/lib64/qt4/lib64 -docdir /usr/share/doc/qt4-doc-4.1.3 -platform linux-g++-64 -release -shared -no-exceptions -largefile -qt-gif -system-zlib -system-libpng -system-libjpeg -plugin-sql-mysql -I/usr/include/mysql -plugin-sql-psql -plugin-sql-odbc -plugin-sql-sqlite -cups -sm -stl -xcursor -xinerama -xshape -xrandr -xrender -xkb -fontconfig -tablet As you can see, mysql_ldflags seems empty! However: rineau at schtroumpfette ~/RPM $ mysql_config --libs | perl -pi -e "s, -l/? \S+,,g" -L/usr/lib64/mysql -L/usr/lib64 Maybe this is the %() that should be $(), as for %mysql_include. I do not know these two syntaxes. What is "%global", instead of "%define"? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 20 18:45:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 May 2006 14:45:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192524] Review Request: knemo - A KDE network monitoring tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605201845.k4KIjmHA002530@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: knemo - A KDE network monitoring tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192524 ------- Additional Comments From hugo at devin.com.br 2006-05-20 14:45 EST ------- Hi Christoph, I'm really sorry for not searching for the package in the FE-NEW as you noted... I usually search in the search query and yum repositories, and I don't know why I couldn't find it, maybe it was a typo :) Well, this will not happen again. Thanks for your input. I'm contacting the other packager to let him know of this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 20 19:09:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 May 2006 15:09:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189088] Review Request: knemo Network monitor applet. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605201909.k4KJ9GBM007475@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: knemo Network monitor applet. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189088 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-05-20 15:09 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > Needs work: > * The directory /usr/share/apps/knemo/ should be owned by the package > And it should be /usr/share/knemo/ not /usr/share/apps/knemo/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 20 19:18:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 May 2006 15:18:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189088] Review Request: knemo Network monitor applet. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605201918.k4KJIK4H009001@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: knemo Network monitor applet. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189088 ------- Additional Comments From hugo at devin.com.br 2006-05-20 15:18 EST ------- Per default, KDE applications use the /usr/share/apps instead of /usr/share. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 20 19:21:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 May 2006 15:21:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192475] Review Request: perl-PadWalker - Play with other peoples' lexical variables In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605201921.k4KJLT0p009493@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-PadWalker - Play with other peoples' lexical variables https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192475 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |tibbs at math.uh.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 20 19:26:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 May 2006 15:26:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189088] Review Request: knemo Network monitor applet. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605201926.k4KJQkSu010360@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: knemo Network monitor applet. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189088 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-05-20 15:26 EST ------- Ugly :) But it seems you'r correct, sorry mybad. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 20 19:30:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 May 2006 15:30:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 173459] Review Request: initng In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605201930.k4KJUgNB011078@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 ------- Additional Comments From che666 at gmail.com 2006-05-20 15:30 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=129763) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=129763&action=view) fixes hardcoded path for 64 bit builds so plugins can work at all. fixes hardcoded path for 64 bit builds so plugins can work at all. (its already in the upstream queue to be commitedm just for those that need it working meanwhile :) ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 20 19:46:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 May 2006 15:46:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192564] New: Review Request: uuid Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192564 Summary: Review Request: uuid Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: steve at silug.org QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://ftp.kspei.com/pub/steve/rpms/uuid/uuid.spec SRPM URL: http://ftp.kspei.com/pub/steve/rpms/uuid-1.4.2-1.src.rpm Description: OSSP uuid is a ISO-C:1999 application programming interface (API) and corresponding command line interface (CLI) for the generation of DCE 1.1, ISO/IEC 11578:1996 and RFC 4122 compliant Universally Unique Identifier (UUID). It supports DCE 1.1 variant UUIDs of version 1 (time and node based), version 3 (name based, MD5), version 4 (random number based) and version 5 (name based, SHA-1). Additional API bindings are provided for the languages ISO-C++:1998, Perl:5 and PHP:4/5. Optional backward compatibility exists for the ISO-C DCE-1.1 and Perl Data::UUID APIs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 20 19:51:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 May 2006 15:51:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 173459] Review Request: initng In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605201951.k4KJpVJF015573@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 che666 at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #128966|0 |1 is obsolete| | ------- Additional Comments From che666 at gmail.com 2006-05-20 15:51 EST ------- (From update of attachment 128966) fixed upstream already and is in 0.6.7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 20 19:58:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 May 2006 15:58:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189892] Review Request: dssi - Disposable Soft Synth Interface In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605201958.k4KJwCSm016696@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dssi - Disposable Soft Synth Interface https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189892 ------- Additional Comments From seg at haxxed.com 2006-05-20 15:58 EST ------- After poking things a bit more, I think dssi-devel should Depend: on alsa-lib-devel, ladspa-devel, and liblo-devel. But not jack-devel, the dssi API itself does not use jack. Not so sure the examples package needs a versioned dependency on the main package. Any other dssi plugins wouldn't do so. And since its just a header file, I don't think the devel package actually needs to depend on the main package at all... (This would prevent mock from having to d/l and install dssi, which pulls in jack...) If you really wanted to reduce dependency bloat, you could split jack-dssi-host off into its own package, isolating the jack dependency, but I really don't think its worth going quite that far. Just rm-ing the .la files in %install seems marginally cleaner to me. And is what most other packages seem to do. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 20 20:06:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 May 2006 16:06:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192524] Review Request: knemo - A KDE network monitoring tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605202006.k4KK6LmB017931@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: knemo - A KDE network monitoring tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192524 ------- Additional Comments From hugo at devin.com.br 2006-05-20 16:06 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > BTW: Do not include *.la-files, see > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-2302ec1e1f44202c9cc4bcce24cb711266557ad7 KDE's KControl files requires ".la" files to work properly, so we have to make an exception here ;-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 20 20:08:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 May 2006 16:08:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188180] Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605202008.k4KK8ube018308@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188180 ------- Additional Comments From laurent.rineau__fedora_extras at normalesup.org 2006-05-20 16:08 EST ------- With these three lines, it seems to find the correct flags: %global mysql_include $(mysql_config --include || echo "-I%{_includedir}/mysql") %global mysql_libs $(mysql_config --libs || echo "-L%{_libdir}/mysql") %global mysql_ldflags $(echo %{mysql_libs} | perl -pi -e "s, -l/? \\\S+,,g") See the extra quote of "\" in mysql_ldflags. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 20 20:19:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 May 2006 16:19:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177081] Review Request: nucleo In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605202019.k4KKJM4H019843@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nucleo https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177081 ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2006-05-20 16:18 EST ------- Okay, I have created a new spec file and SRPM for this. Spec URL: http://tkmame.retrogames.com/fedora-extras/nucleo.spec SRPM URL: http://tkmame.retrogames.com/fedora-extras/nucleo-0.5-1.src.rpm *** NOTE *** You may have to download the src.rpm from: http://tkmame.retrogames.com/fedora-extras/ This spec file is a complete rewrite from scratch. I would like to take over ownership of this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 20 20:33:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 May 2006 16:33:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 183912] Review Request: jack-audio-connection-kit - The Jack Audio Connection Kit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605202033.k4KKXfQV022359@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jack-audio-connection-kit - The Jack Audio Connection Kit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183912 ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2006-05-20 16:33 EST ------- I agree with the review of comment 38. Apply for cvsextras in the account system, I'll sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 20 20:35:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 May 2006 16:35:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 174325] Review Request: mod_spin Apache module In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605202035.k4KKZEtS022714@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mod_spin Apache module https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174325 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 20 20:41:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 May 2006 16:41:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192568] New: Review Request: perl-File-Type Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192568 Summary: Review Request: perl-File-Type Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: steve at silug.org QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://ftp.kspei.com/pub/steve/rpms/perl-File-Type/perl-File-Type.spec SRPM URL: http://ftp.kspei.com/pub/steve/rpms/perl-File-Type-0.22-1.src.rpm Description: File::Type uses magic numbers (typically at the start of a file) to determine the MIME type of that file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 20 20:43:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 May 2006 16:43:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192475] Review Request: perl-PadWalker - Play with other peoples' lexical variables In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605202043.k4KKh8xS024527@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-PadWalker - Play with other peoples' lexical variables https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192475 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-05-20 16:42 EST ------- * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. It's not included separately in the package, but this is not necessary as the upstream tarball does not include it. * source files match upstream: 05d684ce2f17ef4f058ec2e912b5f95c PadWalker-1.0.tar.gz 05d684ce2f17ef4f058ec2e912b5f95c PadWalker-1.0.tar.gz-srpm * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: PadWalker.so()(64bit) perl(PadWalker) = 1.0 perl-PadWalker = 1.0-1.fc6 - libc.so.6()(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit) perl >= 0:5.008 perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8) perl(DynaLoader) perl(Exporter) perl(strict) perl(vars) rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 rpmlib(VersionedDependencies) <= 3.0.3-1 * shared libraries are present, but internal to Perl so no need to call ldconfig. * package is not relocatable. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * %clean is present. * %check is present and all tests pass: All tests successful. Files=9, Tests=65, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.11 cusr + 0.07 csys = 0.18 CPU) * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no libtool .la droppings. * not a GUI app. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 20 20:58:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 May 2006 16:58:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192571] New: Review Request: perl-IO-Null Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192571 Summary: Review Request: perl-IO-Null Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: steve at silug.org QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://ftp.kspei.com/pub/steve/rpms/perl-IO-Null/perl-IO-Null.spec SRPM URL: http://ftp.kspei.com/pub/steve/rpms/perl-IO-Null-1.01-1.src.rpm Description: IO::Null is a class for null filehandles. Calling a constructor of this class always succeeds, returning a new null filehandle. Writing to any object of this class is always a no-operation, and returns true. Reading from any object of this class is always no-operation, and returns empty-string or empty-list, as appropriate. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 20 21:02:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 May 2006 17:02:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 169703] Review Request: pari - Number Theory-oriented Computer Algebra System In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605202102.k4KL2MT2027906@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pari - Number Theory-oriented Computer Algebra System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=169703 ------- Additional Comments From gemi at bluewin.ch 2006-05-20 17:02 EST ------- (In reply to comment #21) > In FC5 mock, I get: > > dvips -t landscape -t a4 refcard.dvi -o refcard.ps > make[2]: dvips: Command not found > make[2]: *** [refcard.ps] Error 127 > > Looks like a needed BR on tetex-dvips. Ok added. > I ended up dropping the --host= line altogether and patching the Makefile to > correctly build the shared library. SRPM here: What is difference to the situation before we used --host=none? It then already built fine, the problem was were the non-pic libraries, and, as you say, this is still the case. (See also comment #5) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 20 21:24:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 May 2006 17:24:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192574] New: Review Request: perl-Data-Structure-Util Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192574 Summary: Review Request: perl-Data-Structure-Util Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: steve at silug.org QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://ftp.kspei.com/pub/steve/rpms/perl-Data-Structure-Util/perl-Data-Structure-Util.spec SRPM URL: http://ftp.kspei.com/pub/steve/rpms/perl-Data-Structure-Util-0.11-1.src.rpm Description: Data::Structure::Util is a toolbox to manipulate the data inside a data structure. It can process an entire tree and perform the operation requested on each appropriate element. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 20 21:32:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 May 2006 17:32:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189088] Review Request: knemo Network monitor applet. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605202132.k4KLWSrC032519@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: knemo Network monitor applet. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189088 ------- Additional Comments From hugo at devin.com.br 2006-05-20 17:32 EST ------- Oh my god, I shouldn't have done this, but... SPEC: http://www.devin.com.br/eitch/rpm/fedora/SPECS/knemo.spec SRPM: http://www.devin.com.br/eitch/rpm/fedora/5/SRPMS/knemo-0.4.0-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 20 21:34:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 May 2006 17:34:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192575] New: Review Request: perl-Pipeline Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192575 Summary: Review Request: perl-Pipeline Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: steve at silug.org QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://ftp.kspei.com/pub/steve/rpms/perl-Pipeline/perl-Pipeline.spec SRPM URL: http://ftp.kspei.com/pub/steve/rpms/perl-Pipeline-3.12-1.src.rpm Description: Pipelines are a mechanism to process data. They are designed to be plugged together to make fairly complex operations act in a fairly straightforward manner, cleanly, and simply. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 20 21:36:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 May 2006 17:36:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192575] Review Request: perl-Pipeline In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605202136.k4KLaDaD000933@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Pipeline https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192575 steve at silug.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |192571, 192574 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 20 21:36:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 May 2006 17:36:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192574] Review Request: perl-Data-Structure-Util In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605202136.k4KLaP9g001005@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Data-Structure-Util https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192574 steve at silug.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |192575 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 20 21:36:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 May 2006 17:36:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192571] Review Request: perl-IO-Null In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605202136.k4KLak5e001053@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-IO-Null https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192571 steve at silug.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |192575 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 20 21:48:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 May 2006 17:48:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189088] Review Request: knemo Network monitor applet. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605202148.k4KLm2q4003298@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: knemo Network monitor applet. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189088 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-05-20 17:47 EST ------- (In reply to comment #6) > Oh my god, I shouldn't have done this, but... > Indeed you shouldn't. As said I think its great you want to create more packages for Fedora. I also understand that you've put time and energy into sparse and thus don't want to just walk away just because somebodyelse is also working on it*. But you can't just hijack thihs package let alone this review request. Please try to contact Richard June (rjune at bravegnuworld.com) and work together with him on this. You could do a comaintainer ship: Merge your 2 specfiles using the best parts of both. Then one of you imports it into cvs and becomes the owner as specified in owners.list, the others bugzilla email gets put in the initial-CC field of owners.list, so that he gets all bugzilla mail related to the package 2, then you can coordinate bugfixes for Bz bugs through BZ and other bugfixes / new releases through private mail. * been there done that myself, search the f-e-l mailing list archives on monkey-bubble -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 20 21:50:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 May 2006 17:50:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192577] New: Review Request: perl-OpenFrame Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192577 Summary: Review Request: perl-OpenFrame Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: steve at silug.org QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://ftp.kspei.com/pub/steve/rpms/perl-OpenFrame/perl-OpenFrame.spec SRPM URL: http://ftp.kspei.com/pub/steve/rpms/perl-OpenFrame-3.05-1.src.rpm Description: OpenFrame is a framework for network services serving to multiple media channels - for instance, the web, WAP, and digital television. It is built around the Pipeline API, and provides extra abstraction to make delivery of a single application to multiple channels easier. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 20 21:57:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 May 2006 17:57:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192577] Review Request: perl-OpenFrame In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605202157.k4KLvicQ004866@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-OpenFrame https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192577 steve at silug.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |192568, 192575 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 20 21:57:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 May 2006 17:57:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192575] Review Request: perl-Pipeline In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605202157.k4KLvuhA004923@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Pipeline https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192575 steve at silug.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |192577 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 20 21:58:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 May 2006 17:58:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192568] Review Request: perl-File-Type In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605202158.k4KLw7Fi004944@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-File-Type https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192568 steve at silug.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |192577 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 20 22:17:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 May 2006 18:17:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189088] Review Request: knemo Network monitor applet. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605202217.k4KMHpWC007814@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: knemo Network monitor applet. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189088 ------- Additional Comments From hugo at devin.com.br 2006-05-20 18:17 EST ------- (In reply to comment #7) > > Oh my god, I shouldn't have done this, but... > > Indeed you shouldn't. As said I think its great you want to create more packages > for Fedora. I also understand that you've put time and energy into sparse and > thus don't want to just walk away just because somebodyelse is also working on > it*. But you can't just hijack thihs package let alone this review request. I'm not trying to overtake the package. Like I said in the other bug, I made a mistake and recognized that. But as I am exercising my package work, I made my last available SPECS and SRPMS for the maintainer (Richard June) to use it (I already did it before Aurelien duplicated my bug). Since my spec conforms with many things noted by the reviewer, he can use it freely to learn and get this package available in Extras on short-time. > Please try to contact Richard June (rjune at bravegnuworld.com) and work together > with him on this. I sent an e-mail to him early talking about this, asking him if he still wants to maintain the package, and pointing my work so that if he wants to maintain, he can use a more-correct specfile ;) > You could do a comaintainer ship: Merge your 2 specfiles using the best parts of > both. Then one of you imports it into cvs and becomes the owner as specified in > owners.list, the others bugzilla email gets put in the initial-CC field of > owners.list, so that he gets all bugzilla mail related to the package 2, then > you can coordinate bugfixes for Bz bugs through BZ and other bugfixes / new > releases through private mail. It is a great idea, but if he wants to maintain the package and use my specfile, he can do it and I will not want any credits for it :P Just think of it as a replacement for my mistake (not looking in FE-NEW bug). I'll wait an answer from him, and one more time: I am very sorry about this issue! This won't happen again. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 20 22:18:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 May 2006 18:18:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192568] Review Request: perl-File-Type In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605202218.k4KMIO09007946@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-File-Type https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192568 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |tibbs at math.uh.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 20 22:24:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 May 2006 18:24:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192578] New: Review Request: metamonitor - A Simple program that watches log files and popup its changes Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192578 Summary: Review Request: metamonitor - A Simple program that watches log files and popup its changes Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: hugo at devin.com.br QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.devin.com.br/eitch/rpm/fedora/metamonitor.spec SRPM URL: http://www.devin.com.br/eitch/rpm/fedora/5/SRPMS/metamonitor-0.4.5-1.src.rpm Description: metamonitor is a simple program written for KDE, which watches the syslog's or metalog's log file and pops up the window whenever the new message comes. You can specify the file to watch and a regular expression for parsing the log line, so you can watch other than log files too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 20 22:27:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 May 2006 18:27:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188180] Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605202227.k4KMRsnV009284@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188180 laurent.rineau__fedora_extras at normalesup.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #129761|0 |1 is obsolete| | ------- Additional Comments From laurent.rineau__fedora_extras at normalesup.org 2006-05-20 18:27 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=129774) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=129774&action=view) Mysql patch to qt4-4.1.3-2.spec Here is the corresponding patch. The build qt4-4.1.3-2 seems good. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 20 22:39:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 May 2006 18:39:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192575] Review Request: perl-Pipeline In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605202239.k4KMdM2I011797@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Pipeline https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192575 steve at silug.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |192564 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 20 22:39:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 May 2006 18:39:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192564] Review Request: uuid In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605202239.k4KMdYPO011853@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: uuid https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192564 steve at silug.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |192575 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 20 23:49:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 May 2006 19:49:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187621] Review Request: blam In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605202349.k4KNnXba023198@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: blam https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187621 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|fedora-extras- |fedora-package- |list at redhat.com |review at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2006-05-20 19:49 EST ------- I changed configure.in to look for gecko-sharp2 and gtk-sharp2, and also removed the .a, .la, and .so files. The result: http://fedorared.org/~john/review/blam-1.8.2-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 21 00:20:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 May 2006 20:20:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177081] Review Request: nucleo In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605210020.k4L0Kqj0027421@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nucleo https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177081 ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2006-05-20 20:20 EST ------- Spec URL: http://tkmame.retrogames.com/fedora-extras/nucleo.spec SRPM URL: http://tkmame.retrogames.com/fedora-extras/nucleo-0.5-2.src.rpm *** NOTE *** You may have to download the src.rpm from: http://tkmame.retrogames.com/fedora-extras/ %changelog * Sun May 21 2006 Christopher Stone 0.5-2 - Add optional BuildRequires -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 21 00:27:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 May 2006 20:27:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192310] Review Request: PySyck In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605210027.k4L0RiUo028395@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PySyck https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192310 jpmahowald at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |jpmahowald at gmail.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2006-05-20 20:27 EST ------- Missing BuildRequires python-devel Remove Vendor tag Using Prefix for relocatable packages is strongly discouraged. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#RelocatablePackages I recommend using python template from fedora-rpmdevtools package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 21 00:43:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 May 2006 20:43:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187621] Review Request: blam In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605210043.k4L0hrmC031804@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: blam https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187621 ------- Additional Comments From foolish at guezz.net 2006-05-20 20:43 EST ------- Builds after reenabling the find-lang stuff. Doesn't run though. I get this output : "Unhandled Exception: System.DllNotFoundException: libblam.so in (wrapper managed-to-native) Imendio.Blam.MessageConnection:bacon_message_connection_new (string) in <0x0000f> Imendio.Blam.MessageConnection:.ctor (System.String appName) in <0x0005f> Imendio.Blam.Application:.ctor (System.String[] args, System.Object[] props) in <0x0002c> Imendio.Blam.Application:Main (System.String[] args) " Not knowing anything about blam nor C# or anything like this, I've made a patch that for me at least solves this. Basicly changing all references to libblam.so to libblam.so.0 Updated spec: http://folk.ntnu.no/sindrb/packages/blam.spec Updated src.rpm: http://folk.ntnu.no/sindrb/packages/blam-1.8.2-3.src.rpm If this works for you I'll merge the patches and ship upstream. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 21 01:01:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 May 2006 21:01:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192311] Review Request: cobbler In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605210101.k4L11jvo001783@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cobbler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192311 jpmahowald at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |jpmahowald at gmail.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2006-05-20 21:01 EST ------- rpmlint: E: cobbler description-line-too-long Cobbler is a command line tool for simplified configuration of boot/provisioning servers. It is also accessible as a Python library. Cobbler supports PXE, Xen, and re-provisioning an existing Linux system via auto-kickstart. The last two modes require 'koan' to be run on the remote system. Wrap at 80 characters. E: cobbler no-changelogname-tag You need a %changelog E: cobbler non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/cobbler/cobbler.py 0644 Begins with #!/usr/bin/python, ignorable. * Package is marked as relocatable, please check. (wiki: Packaging/Guidelines#RelocatablePackages) * Spec file: tag Vendor is forbidden (wiki: Packaging/Guidelines#tags) * No downloadable source. Please give the full URL in the Source tag. * The BuildRoot must be cleaned at the beginning of %install -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 21 02:08:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 May 2006 22:08:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 176374] Review Request: nagios-plugins In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605210208.k4L28sx5012222@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nagios-plugins https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176374 ------- Additional Comments From imlinux at gmail.com 2006-05-20 22:08 EST ------- SPEC: http://mmcgrath.net/~mmcgrath/nagios/nagios-plugins.spec SRPM: http://mmcgrath.net/~mmcgrath/nagios/nagios-plugins-1.4.3-4.src.rpm Changelog: - Now using configure macro instead of ./configure - Added BuildRequest: perl(Net::SNMP) - For reference, this was bugzilla.redhat.com ticket# 176374 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 21 02:14:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 May 2006 22:14:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 180092] Review Request: NRPE - Monitoring agent for Nagios In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605210214.k4L2EMNb013014@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: NRPE - Monitoring agent for Nagios https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=180092 ------- Additional Comments From imlinux at gmail.com 2006-05-20 22:14 EST ------- Please see: http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-extras-list/2006-April/msg01374.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 21 06:21:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 May 2006 02:21:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189892] Review Request: dssi - Disposable Soft Synth Interface In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605210621.k4L6LYNT015427@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dssi - Disposable Soft Synth Interface https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189892 ------- Additional Comments From seg at haxxed.com 2006-05-21 02:21 EST ------- Ooops. The .pc file needs to be in the devel package, not the examples. :) Yeah, thinks seem to work fine with dssi-devel not depending on dssi. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 21 07:47:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 May 2006 03:47:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190040] Review Request: hydrogen - Advanced drum machine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605210747.k4L7lK92030846@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hydrogen - Advanced drum machine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190040 seg at haxxed.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |seg at haxxed.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 21 07:47:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 May 2006 03:47:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189892] Review Request: dssi - Disposable Soft Synth Interface In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605210747.k4L7lqbe031001@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dssi - Disposable Soft Synth Interface https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189892 seg at haxxed.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |seg at haxxed.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 21 07:49:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 May 2006 03:49:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190027] Review Request: hexter-dssi - DSSI software synthesizer plugin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605210749.k4L7n45G031291@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hexter-dssi - DSSI software synthesizer plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190027 seg at haxxed.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |seg at haxxed.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 21 07:56:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 May 2006 03:56:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192583] New: Review Request: php-pear-XML-Parser - XML parsing class based on PHP's bundled expat Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192583 Summary: Review Request: php-pear-XML-Parser - XML parsing class based on PHP's bundled expat Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: Fedora at FamilleCollet.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://remi.collet.free.fr/rpms/extras/php-pear-XML-Parser.spec SRPM URL: http://remi.collet.free.fr/rpms/extras/php-pear-XML-Parser-1.2.7-1.fc5.src.rpm Description: http://remi.collet.free.fr/rpms/extras/php-pear-XML-Parser-build.log This is an XML parser based on PHPs built-in xml extension. It supports two basic modes of operation: "func" and "event". In "func" mode, it will look for a function named after each element (xmltag_ELEMENT for start tags and xmltag_ELEMENT_ for end tags), and in "event" mode it uses a set of generic callbacks. Since version 1.2.0 there's a new XML_Parser_Simple class that makes parsing of most XML documents easier, by automatically providing a stack for the elements. Furthermore its now possible to split the parser from the handler object, so you do not have to extend XML_Parser anymore in order to parse a document with it. -------------------- With DB, HTTP (Bug #190156), Mail (Bug #190066), Net_Socket (Bug #190957), Net_SMTP (Bug #190958), extras will provides all the extensions which was provides by php until version 5.0.4 (in FC4). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 21 08:22:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 May 2006 04:22:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189884] Review Request: LASH Audio Session Handler In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605210822.k4L8MYYt010946@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: LASH Audio Session Handler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189884 seg at haxxed.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |seg at haxxed.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 21 08:26:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 May 2006 04:26:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190040] Review Request: hydrogen - Advanced drum machine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605210826.k4L8QAiM022889@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hydrogen - Advanced drum machine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190040 seg at haxxed.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 21 08:34:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 May 2006 04:34:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190040] Review Request: hydrogen - Advanced drum machine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605210834.k4L8YT83024750@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hydrogen - Advanced drum machine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190040 ------- Additional Comments From seg at haxxed.com 2006-05-21 04:34 EST ------- Michael: You have dibs on this review, but you hadn't assigned it to yourself. I do want to work on this tommorow. Sorry if I'm stepping on your toes. Reassign it if you want it? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 21 08:37:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 May 2006 04:37:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189892] Review Request: dssi - Disposable Soft Synth Interface In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605210837.k4L8bvU2025272@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dssi - Disposable Soft Synth Interface https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189892 seg at haxxed.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 21 08:38:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 May 2006 04:38:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190027] Review Request: hexter-dssi - DSSI software synthesizer plugin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605210838.k4L8cuGj025580@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hexter-dssi - DSSI software synthesizer plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190027 seg at haxxed.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 21 08:39:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 May 2006 04:39:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191604] Review Request: lineakd - linux easy-access-key daemon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605210839.k4L8d4wG025609@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lineakd - linux easy-access-key daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191604 ------- Additional Comments From lists at forevermore.net 2006-05-21 04:38 EST ------- Still not 100% happy with the ldconfig stuff, but at least this way my specs are consistent with each other. Shuffling files around, so new files are at: http://rpm.forevermore.net/lineak/lineakd.spec http://rpm.forevermore.net/lineak/lineakd-0.8.4-3.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 21 08:39:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 May 2006 04:39:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189088] Review Request: knemo Network monitor applet. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605210839.k4L8dqSo025769@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: knemo Network monitor applet. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189088 ------- Additional Comments From gauret at free.fr 2006-05-21 04:39 EST ------- Hugo, just to make it clear: I understand your motives and it's nice of you to help Richard with this package. Except, you're giving him a fish, instead of teaching him how to fish. About the *.la files, the ones directly in /usr/lib/*.la are safe to remove, but the others are often needed by KDE. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 21 08:40:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 May 2006 04:40:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191607] Review Request: lineak_xosdplugin - Onscreen display support for lineakd In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605210840.k4L8eelK025935@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lineak_xosdplugin - Onscreen display support for lineakd https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191607 ------- Additional Comments From lists at forevermore.net 2006-05-21 04:40 EST ------- Shuffling files around on my server, and making a few changes to bring things up to par. http://rpm.forevermore.net/lineak/lineak_xosdplugin.spec http://rpm.forevermore.net/lineak/lineak_xosdplugin-0.8.4-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 21 08:41:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 May 2006 04:41:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191606] Review Request: lineak_kdeplugins - KDE-based actions for lineakd In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605210841.k4L8fJup026044@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lineak_kdeplugins - KDE-based actions for lineakd https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191606 ------- Additional Comments From lists at forevermore.net 2006-05-21 04:41 EST ------- Shuffling files around on my server, and making a few changes to bring things up to par. http://rpm.forevermore.net/lineak/lineak_kdeplugins.spec http://rpm.forevermore.net/lineak/lineak_kdeplugins-0.8.4-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 21 08:41:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 May 2006 04:41:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191605] Review Request: lineak_defaultplugin - default actions for lineakd In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605210841.k4L8fW3u026080@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lineak_defaultplugin - default actions for lineakd https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191605 ------- Additional Comments From lists at forevermore.net 2006-05-21 04:41 EST ------- Shuffling files around on my server, and making a few changes to bring things up to par. http://rpm.forevermore.net/lineak/lineak_defaultplugin.spec http://rpm.forevermore.net/lineak/lineak_defaultplugin-0.8.4-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 21 09:50:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 May 2006 05:50:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192540] Review Request: cal3d - A skeletal based 3-D character animation library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605210950.k4L9oNSh006895@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cal3d - A skeletal based 3-D character animation library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192540 ------- Additional Comments From che666 at gmail.com 2006-05-21 05:50 EST ------- spec file looks good to me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 21 10:24:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 May 2006 06:24:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189892] Review Request: dssi - Disposable Soft Synth Interface In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605211024.k4LAO2c6013021@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dssi - Disposable Soft Synth Interface https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189892 ------- Additional Comments From green at redhat.com 2006-05-21 06:24 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > After poking things a bit more, I think dssi-devel should Depend: on > alsa-lib-devel, ladspa-devel, and liblo-devel. But not jack-devel, the dssi API > itself does not use jack. Done. > Not so sure the examples package needs a versioned dependency on the main > package. Any other dssi plugins wouldn't do so. The difference is that the examples are bundled with the main package sources. I don't think it hurts to keep them in sync. > And since its just a header file, I don't think the devel package actually needs > to depend on the main package at all... (This would prevent mock from having to > d/l and install dssi, which pulls in jack...) Done. I've also moved COPYING to the devel package, since it only applies to the header file. The README file covers everything else. > If you really wanted to reduce dependency bloat, you could split jack-dssi-host > off into its own package, isolating the jack dependency, but I really don't > think its worth going quite that far. Not done :-) > Just rm-ing the .la files in %install seems marginally cleaner to me. And is > what most other packages seem to do. Done. I've also fixed the .pc file problem. Thanks for your help! Updated bits here.... Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/green/FE/FC5/dssi.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/green/FE/FC5/dssi-0.9.1-3.src.rpm AG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 21 12:13:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 May 2006 08:13:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187621] Review Request: blam In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605211213.k4LCD7OD031127@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: blam https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187621 ------- Additional Comments From bugs.michael at gmx.net 2006-05-21 08:12 EST ------- > removed the .a, .la, and .so files. Eeek! Why also the .so files? These are plugin DSOs in %_libdir/blam/ which are local to this application. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 21 15:04:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 May 2006 11:04:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 178900] Review Request: monodoc In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605211504.k4LF4vr5026118@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: monodoc https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=178900 ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at ameritech.net 2006-05-21 11:04 EST ------- Couple items still need work: * Unnecessary scriptlet for shared libraries is still in spec. * -devel package should require on %{name} = %{version}-%{release} -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 21 16:21:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 May 2006 12:21:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191603] Review Request: rsnapshot -- rsync-based filesystem snapshots In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605211621.k4LGLpmC005494@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rsnapshot -- rsync-based filesystem snapshots https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191603 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 21 16:38:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 May 2006 12:38:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 183438] Review Request: idioskopos (C++ Introspection Library) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605211638.k4LGcBHo008716@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: idioskopos (C++ Introspection Library) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183438 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|fedora-extras- |fedora-package- |list at redhat.com |review at redhat.com Severity|enhancement |normal Keywords| |FutureFeature rvinyard at cs.nmsu.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |FutureFeature ------- Additional Comments From rvinyard at cs.nmsu.edu 2006-05-21 12:37 EST ------- New release - 0.2.0 Small changes to spec file to remove doxygen and graphiz build dependencies since docs are now pre-built. Spec Name or Url: http://miskatonic.cs.nmsu.edu/pub/idioskopos.spec SRPM Name or Url: http://miskatonic.cs.nmsu.edu/pub/fedora/5/srpms/idioskopos-0.2.0-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 21 16:55:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 May 2006 12:55:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190956] Review Request: php-pear-Auth-SASL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605211655.k4LGtGNa011595@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Auth-SASL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190956 ------- Additional Comments From Fedora at FamilleCollet.com 2006-05-21 12:55 EST ------- Update to new version 1.0.2 Spec URL: http://remi.collet.free.fr/rpms/extras/php-pear-Auth-SASL.spec SRPM URL:http://remi.collet.free.fr/rpms/extras/php-pear-Auth-SASL-1.0.2-1.fc5.src.rpm Mock build.log : http://remi.collet.free.fr/rpms/extras/php-pear-Auth-SASL-build.log -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 21 16:59:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 May 2006 12:59:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192568] Review Request: perl-File-Type In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605211659.k4LGxR5R012164@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-File-Type https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192568 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-05-21 12:59 EST ------- A couple of questions: Any idea why Module::Build shows up in the final requires list and if it really needs to be there? What on Earth is the NINJA file for? Review: * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. Text not included upstream. * source files match upstream: 4be3b0b7000b325c60351fcc8a04815d File-Type-0.22.tar.gz 4be3b0b7000b325c60351fcc8a04815d File-Type-0.22.tar.gz-srpm * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * rpmlint is silent. ? final provides and requires are sane: perl(File::Type) = 0.22 perl(File::Type::Builder) = 0.11 perl-File-Type = 0.22-1.fc6 - perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8) perl(IO::File) perl(strict) perl(warnings) rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 rpmlib(VersionedDependencies) <= 3.0.3-1 perl(Module::Build) rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 * no shared libraries are present. * package is not relocatable. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * %clean is present. * %check is present and all tests pass: All tests successful. Files=3, Tests=58, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.13 cusr + 0.06 csys = 0.19 CPU) * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no libtool .la droppings. * not a GUI app. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 21 17:41:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 May 2006 13:41:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 183439] Review Request: papyrus (Canvas drawing library based on cairo/cairomm) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605211741.k4LHffHI018221@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: papyrus (Canvas drawing library based on cairo/cairomm) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183439 ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2006-05-21 13:41 EST ------- rpmlint of papyrus: W: papyrus incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.1.10-1 0.1.11-1.fc6 You're one behind in the changelogs. Sources do not match: 3d0c75f05409da34a8766e7ddbc9df0f papyrus-0.1.11.tar.bz2 (download) 17886301eb027ff4d727c9d27b38570f papyrus-0.1.11.tar.bz2 (srpm) The srpm appears to have a more recent ChangeLog. While you're at it change the Source to point to download.sourceforge.net to automatically choose a mirror. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 21 17:58:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 May 2006 13:58:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192600] New: Review Request: sflowtool - Command line utility for analyzing sFlow data Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192600 Summary: Review Request: sflowtool - Command line utility for analyzing sFlow data Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: andreas at bawue.net QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://home.bawue.net/~ixs/sflowtool/sflowtool.spec SRPM URL: http://home.bawue.net/~ixs/sflowtool/sflowtool-3.10-1.src.rpm Description: The core component of the sFlow toolkit is the sflowtool command line utility. sflowtool interfaces to utilities such as tcpdump, ntop and Snort for detailed packet tracing and analysis, NetFlow compatible collectors for IP flow accounting, and provides text based output that can be used in scripts to provide customized analysis and reporting and for integrating with other tools such as MRTG or rrdtool NB: Please take a look at the license, it looks pretty BSDish to me, but someone else should please make sure. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 21 18:13:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 May 2006 14:13:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190129] Review Request: python-krbV In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605211813.k4LIDH86023202@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-krbV https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190129 ------- Additional Comments From mikeb at redhat.com 2006-05-21 14:13 EST ------- New specfile and srpm posted: http://people.redhat.com/mikeb/python-krbV/python-krbV.spec http://people.redhat.com/mikeb/python-krbV/python-krbV-1.0.12-3.src.rpm Fixed .spec permissions (rpmbuild -ts was doing something funny). Removed BuildRequires: python Replaced $RPM_BUILD_ROOT with %{buildroot} -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 21 18:13:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 May 2006 14:13:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191208] Review Request: The Ipe extensible drawing editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605211813.k4LIDpXd023350@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: The Ipe extensible drawing editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191208 ------- Additional Comments From laurent.rineau__fedora_extras at normalesup.org 2006-05-21 14:13 EST ------- Update: Spec URL: http://www.di.ens.fr/~rineau/Fedora/ipe.spec SRPM URL: http://www.di.ens.fr/~rineau/Fedora/ipe-6.0-0.3.pre26.src.rpm * Sun May 21 2006 Laurent Rineau - 6.0-0.3.pre26 - Added a desktop file for Ipe. * Sun May 21 2006 Laurent Rineau - 6.0-0.2.pre26 - Fix directories ownership. - ipelets/*.so are now in -devel. - Creation of -doc subpackage. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 21 18:21:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 May 2006 14:21:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190175] Review Request: p0rn-comfort - Support programs for browsing image-gallery sites In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605211821.k4LILpIb025116@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: p0rn-comfort - Support programs for browsing image-gallery sites https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190175 ------- Additional Comments From andreas at bawue.net 2006-05-21 14:21 EST ------- H tibbs, Updated package at http://home.bawue.de/~ixs/p0rn-comfort/ I've incorporated your idea of moving some files out of %{_bindir} and put them into %{_libexecdir}/%{_name} as decided on IRC. I also fixed the issue with p0rn-proxy, so it could be checked in. On IRC you said, you already approved the package, but reading your bugzilla entry, that's not very clear. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 21 18:24:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 May 2006 14:24:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191604] Review Request: lineakd - linux easy-access-key daemon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605211824.k4LIOwXV025775@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lineakd - linux easy-access-key daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191604 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-05-21 14:24 EST ------- Everything looks fine now. rpmlint is fine once you ignore the bugus warning, requires are fine now, buildrequires are fine and the scriptlets are good. I also note that you've added a %{?dist} tag. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 21 18:38:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 May 2006 14:38:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190129] Review Request: python-krbV In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605211838.k4LIcqhb029176@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-krbV https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190129 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-05-21 14:38 EST ------- Odd that the tarball is still mode 664, but this definitely won't matter after you import. Otherwise, everything looks good. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 21 18:48:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 May 2006 14:48:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190471] Review Request: yakuake - Quake-style terminal emulator for KDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605211848.k4LIm5HA031604@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: yakuake - Quake-style terminal emulator for KDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190471 Bug 190471 depends on bug 186283, which changed state. Bug 186283 Summary: yakuake not included in the fc5 extras repository https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=186283 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |ERRATA Status|NEW |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 21 18:51:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 May 2006 14:51:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 183439] Review Request: papyrus (Canvas drawing library based on cairo/cairomm) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605211851.k4LIpB5v032332@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: papyrus (Canvas drawing library based on cairo/cairomm) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183439 ------- Additional Comments From rvinyard at cs.nmsu.edu 2006-05-21 14:50 EST ------- > While you're at it change the Source to point to download.sourceforge.net to > automatically choose a mirror. wget http://download.sourceforge.net/libpapyrus/papyrus-0.1.11.tar.bz2 just hangs. wget http://download.sourceforge.net/libpapyrus/papyrus-0.1.11.tar.bz2?download succeeds. Is the latter syntax ok? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 21 19:18:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 May 2006 15:18:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188180] Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605211918.k4LJI0iX004776@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188180 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-05-21 15:17 EST ------- Spec Name or Url: http://kde-redhat.unl.edu/apt/kde-redhat/SPECS/qt4-4.1.3-3.spec SRPM Name or Url: http://kde-redhat.unl.edu/apt/kde-redhat/all/SRPMS.stable/qt4-4.1.3-3.src.rpm %changelog * Sun May 21 2006 Rex Dieter 4.1.3-3 - fix %%mysql_libs macro -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 21 19:25:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 May 2006 15:25:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190471] Review Request: yakuake - Quake-style terminal emulator for KDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605211925.k4LJPC61005910@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: yakuake - Quake-style terminal emulator for KDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190471 gajownik at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | Fixed In Version| |yakuake-2.7.5-2.fc5 ------- Additional Comments From gajownik at gmail.com 2006-05-21 15:25 EST ------- Yakuake is now in FE5 so I'm closing this bug :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 21 19:30:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 May 2006 15:30:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191604] Review Request: lineakd - linux easy-access-key daemon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605211930.k4LJUr0j006968@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lineakd - linux easy-access-key daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191604 lists at forevermore.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 21 19:31:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 May 2006 15:31:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191606] Review Request: lineak_kdeplugins - KDE-based actions for lineakd In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605211931.k4LJVFTG007103@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lineak_kdeplugins - KDE-based actions for lineakd https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191606 Bug 191606 depends on bug 191604, which changed state. Bug 191604 Summary: Review Request: lineakd - linux easy-access-key daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191604 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 21 19:31:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 May 2006 15:31:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191605] Review Request: lineak_defaultplugin - default actions for lineakd In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605211931.k4LJVQsn007137@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lineak_defaultplugin - default actions for lineakd https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191605 Bug 191605 depends on bug 191604, which changed state. Bug 191604 Summary: Review Request: lineakd - linux easy-access-key daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191604 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 21 19:31:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 May 2006 15:31:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191607] Review Request: lineak_xosdplugin - Onscreen display support for lineakd In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605211931.k4LJVbuq007172@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lineak_xosdplugin - Onscreen display support for lineakd https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191607 Bug 191607 depends on bug 191604, which changed state. Bug 191604 Summary: Review Request: lineakd - linux easy-access-key daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191604 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 21 20:06:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 May 2006 16:06:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192603] New: Review Request: openalpp - Object Oriented version of OpenAL Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192603 Summary: Review Request: openalpp - Object Oriented version of OpenAL Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: chris.stone at gmail.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://tkmame.retrogames.com/fedora-extras/openalpp.spec SRPM URL: http://tkmame.retrogames.com/fedora-extras/openalpp-20060405-2.src.rpm Description: Written in C++, makes OpenAL so much more accessible. Compare openalpp to a scenegraph for OpenGL. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 21 20:10:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 May 2006 16:10:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191582] Review Request: xgalaga - Galaga clone for X11 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605212010.k4LKA76k013271@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xgalaga - Galaga clone for X11 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191582 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |chris.stone at gmail.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 21 20:22:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 May 2006 16:22:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189892] Review Request: dssi - Disposable Soft Synth Interface In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605212022.k4LKMitE015168@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dssi - Disposable Soft Synth Interface https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189892 ------- Additional Comments From seg at haxxed.com 2006-05-21 16:22 EST ------- Ah, licensing. According to the README, the header is LGPL, and jack-dssi-host is "BSD-style". COPYING is included for the header, but everything else seems to have the license in the source code. jack-dssi-host contains: /* * Copyright 2004 Chris Cannam, Steve Harris and Sean Bolton. * * Permission to use, copy, modify, distribute, and sell this software * for any purpose is hereby granted without fee, provided that the * above copyright notice and this permission notice are included in * all copies or substantial portions of the software. */ Does this count as BSD? Everything in the examples directory has something to the effect of "This example file is in the public domain." Note that dssi_osc_send and dssi_osc_update are in the main package, which otherwise seems like the right place to me. So, my guess is dssi-devel should be "License: LGPL", dssi-examples should be "License: Public Domain", and the main package "License: BSD/Public Domain" however mock complains about that one. Maybe it can just be "Distributable". Someone who is knowledgeable in licensing, please take a look at this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 21 20:28:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 May 2006 16:28:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191582] Review Request: xgalaga - Galaga clone for X11 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605212028.k4LKSpMU016017@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xgalaga - Galaga clone for X11 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191582 ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2006-05-21 16:28 EST ------- I'm getting a build error in mock during configure: checking for gcc... gcc checking whether the C compiler (gcc -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64 -mtune=generic -fsigned-char -DXF86VIDMODE -lXxf86vm) works... no configure: error: installation or configuration problem: C compiler cannot create executables. error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.65804 (%build) RPM build errors: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.65804 (%build) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 21 20:29:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 May 2006 16:29:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189892] Review Request: dssi - Disposable Soft Synth Interface In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605212029.k4LKTFr9016124@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dssi - Disposable Soft Synth Interface https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189892 jpmahowald at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |182235 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 21 20:36:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 May 2006 16:36:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192363] Review Request: GTS - Gnu Triangulated Surface Library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605212036.k4LKa8eI017795@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: GTS - Gnu Triangulated Surface Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192363 ------- Additional Comments From ed at eh3.com 2006-05-21 16:35 EST ------- Hi Ralf, I've included your patch (comment #4), added one for gts-config, and imported it into CVS. Please let me know if you see any problems. I'll request builds on FC-4/5 and devel in day or two. And co-maintainership is fine with me -- please feel free to make whatever changes you want to it in CVS at any time. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 21 21:01:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 May 2006 17:01:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191582] Review Request: xgalaga - Galaga clone for X11 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605212101.k4LL1JIB021975@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xgalaga - Galaga clone for X11 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191582 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-05-21 17:01 EST ------- Well it works fine for me can you lift the actual gcc error from config.log that might help. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 21 21:05:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 May 2006 17:05:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190129] Review Request: python-krbV In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605212105.k4LL5D3Y022441@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-krbV https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190129 mikeb at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From mikeb at redhat.com 2006-05-21 17:05 EST ------- Thanks, built in devel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 21 21:11:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 May 2006 17:11:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192606] New: Review Request: yafc: yet another ftp client Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192606 Summary: Review Request: yafc: yet another ftp client Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: lists at forevermore.net QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://rpm.forevermore.net/yafc/yafc.spec SRPM URL: http://rpm.forevermore.net/yafc/yafc-1.1.1-1.src.rpm Description: yafc is Yet Another FTP Client. It is an interactive interface to the FTP and SFTP protocols. FEATURES - cached directory listings - uses readline (tab completion, emacs/vi editing keys, history file, etc.) - extensive tab completion - multiple connections open - aliases - colored ls (i.e., ls --color, uses $LS_COLORS like GNU ls) - autologin and bookmarks - recursive get/put/rm/ls - nohup mode get and put - tagging (queueing) of files for later transferring - automagically enters nohup-mode when SIGHUP received (in get and put) - redirection to local command or file ('>', '>>' and '|') - proxy support - more... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 21 21:31:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 May 2006 17:31:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192546] Review Request: gnubiff In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605212131.k4LLVFo7026298@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnubiff https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192546 ------- Additional Comments From splinux at fedoraproject.org 2006-05-21 17:31 EST ------- Ok, i've made the changes. Source : http://glive.tuxfamily.org/fedora/gnubiff/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 21 21:55:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 May 2006 17:55:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191582] Review Request: xgalaga - Galaga clone for X11 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605212155.k4LLthL1030987@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xgalaga - Galaga clone for X11 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191582 ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2006-05-21 17:55 EST ------- $ cat /var/lib/mock/fedora-5-x86_64-core/root/builddir/build/BUILD/xgalaga-2.0.34/config.log This file contains any messages produced by compilers while running configure, to aid debugging if configure makes a mistake. configure:564: checking host system type configure:588: checking for gcc configure:701: checking whether the C compiler (gcc -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64 -mtune=generic -fsigned-char -DXF86VIDMODE -lXxf86vm) works configure:717: gcc -o conftest -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64 -mtune=generic -fsigned-char -DXF86VIDMODE -lXxf86vm conftest.c 1>&5 configure:714: warning: return type defaults to 'int' /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lXxf86vm collect2: ld returned 1 exit status configure: failed program was: #line 712 "configure" #include "confdefs.h" main(){return(0);} -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 21 22:19:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 May 2006 18:19:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192546] Review Request: gnubiff In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605212219.k4LMJFwR001842@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnubiff https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192546 ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at ameritech.net 2006-05-21 18:19 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=129786) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=129786&action=view) Mock build log failure Your package fails to build in Mock. Also, you can drop the BR on gettext-devel, since the default build environment in Mock installs gettext. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 21 23:32:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 May 2006 19:32:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191582] Review Request: xgalaga - Galaga clone for X11 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605212332.k4LNWkRK013751@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xgalaga - Galaga clone for X11 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191582 ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2006-05-21 19:32 EST ------- * rpmlint output clean * Package meets Package Naming Guidelines * Spec filename matches base package %{name} * Package meets Packaging Guidelines * Package licensed with open source compatible license * License in spec matches actual license * License text included in %doc * Spec file written in American English * Spec file is legible * Sources match upstream 9f7ee685e9c4741b5f0edc3f91df9510 xgalaga_2.0.34.orig.tar.gz 9f7ee685e9c4741b5f0edc3f91df9510 xgalaga_2.0.34.orig.tar.gz * Package successfully compiles and builds on FC5 x86_64 O Package has all BR except libXxf86vm-devel which I needed to add for it to compile * Package does not have any locales * Package does not contain any shared library files * Package is not relocatable * Package owns all directories it creates * Package does not contain any duplicate files in %files * File permissions are set properly * Package contains proper %clean section * Macro usage consistant enough - I notice you use %{__sed}, but don't bother using %{__make} or %{__rm} etc.. * Package contains permissble content * Package does not contain large documentation to warrent a seperate package * Package does not contain header files, libraries or .pc files * Package does not contain any .so files * Package does not require or use a -devel package * Package does not contain any .la files * Package adds an appropriate .desktop entry * Package does not own any files or directories owned by other packages *** MUST *** - You MUST figure out why FC5 needs to add a BuildRequires of libXxf86vm-devel and why this is not needed for your build (presumably FC6) Non-blocking SHOULDs: - Be more consistant with macro usage, for example %{__sed}, but no %{__rm} etc. - I also prefer %{buildroot} instead of $RPM_BUILD_ROOT, but that is a matter of preference. I just think spec files look cleaner when everything consistantly uses %{} format. So basically I'm saying you should use a clean more legible consistant style in your spec files, but I'm not going to say this is a blocker or should be fixed, just a suggestion. - Let me know that the name xgalaga isn't going to be a problem with Namco. I've heard the Lgames are not allowed because the names are too close to the original, is this going to be a problem? - Return the favor by reviewing some of my packages ;-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 22 00:00:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 May 2006 20:00:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191582] Review Request: xgalaga - Galaga clone for X11 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605220000.k4M00R4L018476@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xgalaga - Galaga clone for X11 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191582 ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2006-05-21 20:00 EST ------- One other minor thing I noticed: cat > README.fedora << EOF The latest Fedora xgalaga package also includes fullscreen support, start xgalaga with -window to get the old windowed behaviour. You can switch on the fly between window and fullscreen mode with alt+enter . EOF The word "behaviour" is not American English. It should be "behavior". In addition there should not be a space before the final period. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 22 01:03:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 May 2006 21:03:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187621] Review Request: blam In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605220103.k4M13kTO028843@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: blam https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187621 ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2006-05-21 21:03 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > Eeek! Why also the .so files? These are plugin DSOs in %_libdir/blam/ > which are local to this application. Oops. Silly me, that isn't a devel file. http://fedorared.org/~john/review/blam-1.8.2-4.src.rpm This version incorporates reenables %find_lang, but it doesn't work, no translations found. Sindre, you're still maintainer when this gets through, srpms are just easy to distribute. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 22 09:26:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 May 2006 05:26:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188574] Review Request: rss-glx -- Really Slick Screensavers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605220926.k4M9Qx1D014166@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rss-glx -- Really Slick Screensavers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188574 ------- Additional Comments From nphilipp at redhat.com 2006-05-22 05:26 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > I figured this could use a little attention, so here are some comments: > > Could you provide a script to generate your patched source tarball from upstream's? I've included the script, necessary patch file and a README.fedora to describe these as documentation. I've uploaded these also here: http://tiptoe.de/dav/README.fedora http://tiptoe.de/dav/rss-glx-rm-matrixview.sh http://tiptoe.de/dav/rss-glx-0.8.1-0.8.1.p.diff The new, script-generated tarball is also at: http://tiptoe.de/dav/rss-glx_0.8.1.p.tar.bz2 > > Might it be possible to include the matrixview hack but replace the images with, > I don't know, the Fedora logo and pictures of Seth or something? Or even > nothing; it only uses the compiled-in images if the user doesn't specify a > directory containing images. The format in which these default images are kept is quite obscure... I might try it at a later point (or hey, I'll accept patches ;-) but for starters we can do without that hack I think. > The package builds in mock (development, x86_64) but rpmlint finds quite a bit > to complain about. I'll group the complaints by type: > > W: rss-glx no-version-in-last-changelog > W: rss-glx-debuginfo no-version-in-last-changelog > W: rss-glx-gnome-screensaver no-version-in-last-changelog > W: rss-glx-kde no-version-in-last-changelog > W: rss-glx-xscreensaver no-version-in-last-changelog > > Many of your changelog entries don't include version information. I'va added version info for the latest and next-to-latest entry, I'm not sure about the older ones so I'll leave them blank. > > E: rss-glx obsolete-not-provided rss_glx > > If you obsolete something, you must also provide it. I don't obsolete it anymore as it was only for an old version I never really distributed. > E: rss-glx zero-length /usr/share/doc/rss-glx-0.8.1/NEWS > E: rss-glx zero-length /usr/share/doc/rss-glx-0.8.1/AUTHORS > > No point in packaging these. Removed. > > W: rss-glx-debuginfo dangling-relative-symlink > /usr/src/debug/rss-glx_0.8.1.p/oglc_src/driver.cpp ../src/driver.cpp > W: rss-glx-debuginfo dangling-relative-symlink > /usr/src/debug/rss-glx_0.8.1.p/other_src/driver.c ../src/driver.cpp > W: rss-glx-debuginfo dangling-relative-symlink > /usr/src/debug/rss-glx_0.8.1.p/reallyslick/cpp_src/driver.cpp ../../src/driver.cpp > W: rss-glx-debuginfo dangling-relative-symlink > /usr/src/debug/rss-glx_0.8.1.p/reallyslick/c_src/driver.c ../../src/driver.cpp > > These all seem to be bogus. > > W: rss-glx-gnome-screensaver no-documentation > W: rss-glx-kde no-documentation > W: rss-glx-xscreensaver no-documentation > > Definitely bogus. > > A large number of warnings like this: > W: rss-glx-gnome-screensaver dangling-symlink > /usr/libexec/gnome-screensaver/rss-glx-cyclone /usr/bin/cyclone > > rpmlint is smart enough to ignore symlinks to files in required packages when > those symlinks are in -devel packages, but not in this case. These can all be > ignored. > > W: rss-glx-gnome-screensaver non-standard-dir-in-usr libexec > > I was recently informed on IRC that /usr/libexec is not discouraged in Fedora, > so I don't understand this warning at all. > > I'll do a full review tomorrow. Thanks. I've uploaded the new spec file as well, new SRPM is uploading at the moment, both will be at: http://tiptoe.de/dav/rss-glx.spec http://tiptoe.de/dav/rss-glx-0.8.1-0.3.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 22 09:31:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 May 2006 05:31:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188574] Review Request: rss-glx -- Really Slick Screensavers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605220931.k4M9VCrw015240@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rss-glx -- Really Slick Screensavers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188574 ------- Additional Comments From nphilipp at redhat.com 2006-05-22 05:31 EST ------- Hmm, that generated tarball didn't build here. Stay tuned, I'll probably have a bug in the generating script or in the patch. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 22 09:42:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 May 2006 05:42:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188574] Review Request: rss-glx -- Really Slick Screensavers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605220942.k4M9gWuJ017279@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rss-glx -- Really Slick Screensavers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188574 ------- Additional Comments From nphilipp at redhat.com 2006-05-22 05:42 EST ------- The diff file didn't contain changes to one Makefile.am (ouch). Fixed versions of the diff file, the generated tarball and SRPM are uploading right now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 22 14:32:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 May 2006 10:32:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190664] Review Request: keyutils - Kernel key management userspace utilities In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605221432.k4MEWLr3007839@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: keyutils - Kernel key management userspace utilities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190664 ------- Additional Comments From dhowells at redhat.com 2006-05-22 10:32 EST ------- Is that sufficient, Ralf? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 22 17:10:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 May 2006 13:10:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190243] Review Request: scim-bridge (gtkimm module in C) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605221710.k4MHAFZK008704@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scim-bridge (gtkimm module in C) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190243 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2006-05-22 13:10 EST ------- It has a few bugs, but the package itself is fine. APPROVED. Don't forget to toggle the C++ boolean before building in FC-5. After branching, remove all files from the devel directory and add a dead.package file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 22 19:04:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 May 2006 15:04:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190175] Review Request: p0rn-comfort - Support programs for browsing image-gallery sites In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605221904.k4MJ4VV8010409@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: p0rn-comfort - Support programs for browsing image-gallery sites https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190175 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-05-22 15:04 EST ------- Ahh, bugzilla's back. Everything looks fine; go ahead and check in. APPROVED Note, however, that I think you may need to patch up p0rn-dbrestore and p0rn-dbdump to be able to find the things in /usr/libexec/p0rn-comfort. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 22 19:06:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 May 2006 15:06:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188574] Review Request: rss-glx -- Really Slick Screensavers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605221906.k4MJ60Tj011507@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rss-glx -- Really Slick Screensavers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188574 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |tibbs at math.uh.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 22 19:11:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 May 2006 15:11:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192363] Review Request: GTS - Gnu Triangulated Surface Library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605221911.k4MJBC6m013374@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: GTS - Gnu Triangulated Surface Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192363 ed at eh3.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From ed at eh3.com 2006-05-22 15:10 EST ------- Successfully built on FC-4, FC-5, and devel. Thanks again for the help! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 22 19:12:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 May 2006 15:12:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191523] Review Request: perl-XML-Stream In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605221912.k4MJCAsp013846@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-XML-Stream https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191523 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-05-22 15:11 EST ------- Any response from the author on any of these? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 22 19:23:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 May 2006 15:23:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191605] Review Request: lineak_defaultplugin - default actions for lineakd In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605221923.k4MJNwBn018362@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lineak_defaultplugin - default actions for lineakd https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191605 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |tibbs at math.uh.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 22 19:24:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 May 2006 15:24:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192571] Review Request: perl-IO-Null In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605221924.k4MJOEAH018524@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-IO-Null https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192571 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |tibbs at math.uh.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 22 19:30:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 May 2006 15:30:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189088] Review Request: knemo Network monitor applet. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605221930.k4MJUi3N020973@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: knemo Network monitor applet. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189088 ------- Additional Comments From hugo at devin.com.br 2006-05-22 15:30 EST ------- Hi guys, I received an e-mail by Richard June regarding this issue: Message was signed with unknown key 0x0B7A5FDA3258B581. The validity of the signature cannot be verified. Status: No public key to verify the signature Actually, I'm not particularly interested in maintaining knemo. I would happily concede maintainership to you -- Chuck Norris is a hack. MacGyver could build a gun from a paperclip and shoot Chuck Norris, then build a Stargate from a toaster and hide the body on some planet with no food whatsoever for when Chuck Norris wakes up. Public Key available Here: http://www.bravegnuworld.com/~rjune/pubkey.asc Did I make your life better? http://home.bravegnuworld.com/~rjune/appreciation.html End of signed message If you need other information I can forward the e-mail or ask him to send an e-mail or post here (I don't think it's necessary, but...). Now I can use my specfile for this review, I would be glad if someone can review it to include quality software as soon as possible in Extras :) Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 22 19:44:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 May 2006 15:44:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191200] Review Request: lvm2-cluster In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605221944.k4MJiW74025852@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lvm2-cluster https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191200 ------- Additional Comments From agk at redhat.com 2006-05-22 15:44 EST ------- Updated to lvm2 2.02.06 (built today). Changed BuildRoot. Removed PreReq. Removed %config. Added Requires chkconfig for post & preun. Added Requires lvm2 & device-mapper for preun. Removed the commented out post line that enabled clustering. (In Fedora, if you install the package it doesn't enable clustering by default: you must run lvmconf explicitly when you want to start using clustering.) Reactivated the commented out line in preun to disable clustering: if you *did* enable the package's functionality by running lvmconf --enable-cluster, we *should* turn it off before removing the package. Added missing libsepol-devel buildrequires. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 22 20:07:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 May 2006 16:07:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191200] Review Request: lvm2-cluster In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605222007.k4MK7M67031425@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lvm2-cluster https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191200 ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-05-22 16:07 EST ------- Where are these changes made? I can't see them in internal CVS, and the link in the first comment is no longer valid. Can you re-post the spec file and an updated srpm for which to test? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 22 20:21:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 May 2006 16:21:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187621] Review Request: blam In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605222021.k4MKLEZD002265@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: blam https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187621 ------- Additional Comments From bugs.michael at gmx.net 2006-05-22 16:21 EST ------- > %find_lang, but it doesn't work, no translations found. Is that on x86_64? If so, are any of the *gettext configure checks failing for you? In that case you need to patch the configure script, or get upstream to use better macros, such as those that come with glib2-devel's /usr/share/aclocal/glib-gettext.m4. Older macros use insufficient C casts, which cause the tests to fail. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 22 20:22:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 May 2006 16:22:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190175] Review Request: p0rn-comfort - Support programs for browsing image-gallery sites In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605222022.k4MKMarZ002687@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: p0rn-comfort - Support programs for browsing image-gallery sites https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190175 andreas at bawue.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From andreas at bawue.net 2006-05-22 16:22 EST ------- Thx for the review -> Nextrelease -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 22 20:27:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 May 2006 16:27:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191200] Review Request: lvm2-cluster In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605222027.k4MKRAJe004034@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lvm2-cluster https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191200 ------- Additional Comments From agk at redhat.com 2006-05-22 16:26 EST ------- --with-group= --with-user= If unset like that, 'make install' doesn't explicitly set the group or owner on any files. (People complained they couldn't build it as a non-root user, so I added that workaround. %defattr sets the user & group instead.) ExclusiveArch restricts the package to the archs for which the kernel clustering components are available. >From google, http://www.redhat.com/archives/rpm-list/2002-July/msg00121.html says $RPM_BUILD_ROOT is preferred to %{buildroot}. Everything else already uses the %{} form. The exec_prefix setting does look pointless. It probably got copied from the device-mapper package where it is set to '/'. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 22 20:30:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 May 2006 16:30:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187818] Review Request: ktorrent : KDE bittorrent client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605222030.k4MKU2YF004955@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ktorrent : KDE bittorrent client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187818 ------- Additional Comments From hugo at devin.com.br 2006-05-22 16:29 EST ------- BTW, you should consider updating it to version 2.0beta1, as it contains some more neat features and is stable as well. This kde-apps page shows more info: http://www.kde-apps.org/content/show.php?content=26353 Also, looking at KTorrent's Download Page: http://ktorrent.pwsp.net/index.php?page=downloads We can see some packages for FC5, that maybe could help in building the Extras-compliant specfile. Stay well! Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 22 20:31:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 May 2006 16:31:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192546] Review Request: gnubiff In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605222031.k4MKVQKj005341@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnubiff https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192546 ------- Additional Comments From splinux at fedoraproject.org 2006-05-22 16:31 EST ------- Change available at http://glive.tuxfamily.org/fedora/gnubiff/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 22 20:42:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 May 2006 16:42:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191200] Review Request: lvm2-cluster In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605222042.k4MKggKY008821@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lvm2-cluster https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191200 ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-05-22 16:42 EST ------- Ok, can you please mark IN the specfile why it is exclusivearch? It helps if you give the package over to somebody, or somebody else has to mess with it. Out of 'norm' things like this should be commented. That email is rather old, as in 4 years old. The Fedora Packaging Guidelines recommend that a singular alias method is used, including RPM_BUILD_ROOT. This is a SHOULD, not a must. Also, where can I look at this updated spec file? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 22 20:53:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 May 2006 16:53:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192413] libdhcp : IPv6 and IPv4 DHCP client and network configuration library API In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605222053.k4MKrRpg012461@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: libdhcp : IPv6 and IPv4 DHCP client and network configuration library API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192413 ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-05-22 16:53 EST ------- This package still does not build. Same error: gcc -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64 -mtune=generic -fPIC -I. -Wall -Werror -I/usr/include/dhcp4client -I/usr/include/dhcp4client/isc_dhcp -c -o dhcp4_lease.o dhcp4_lease.c In file included from /usr/include/dhcp4client/isc_dhcp/minires/minires.h:30, from /usr/include/dhcp4client/isc_dhcp/dhcpd.h:61, from dhcp4_lease.c:29: /usr/include/dhcp4client/isc_dhcp/minires/res_update.h:33:27: error: isc-dhcp/list.h: No such file or directory -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 23 01:00:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 May 2006 21:00:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188359] Review Request: bugzilla - bug tracking tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605230100.k4N10wlr017836@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bugzilla - bug tracking tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188359 ------- Additional Comments From nkadel at comcast.net 2006-05-22 20:53 EST ------- Evening, folks. I wrote a bugzilla SRPM myself a while back, that I'd be happy to send the .spec for, but yours is not bad. However, rather than doing all explicit file naming and transfers and exclusions, why not use a tar to transfer everything to the target dir for installation, like this, then put the documentation and contrib directory in as a normal '%doc' set of files, like this? %install mkdir -p ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}/%{bzinstallprefix}/bugzilla # Chicanery because bugzilla lacks an install tool tar cf - . | tar xf - -C ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}/%{bzinstallprefix}/bugzilla \ --exclude=CVS \ --exclude=.cvsignore \ --exclude=t \ --exclude=README \ --exclude=UPGRADING \ --exclude=UPGRADING-pre-2.8 \ --exclude=docs \ --exclude=contrib -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 23 01:12:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 May 2006 21:12:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188359] Review Request: bugzilla - bug tracking tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605230112.k4N1CNsZ018694@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bugzilla - bug tracking tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188359 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-05-22 21:04 EST ------- Lots of good input here over the past couple of week; we even have upstream willing to help us out. Any input from the submitter? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 23 01:21:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 May 2006 21:21:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191523] Review Request: perl-XML-Stream In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605230121.k4N1LBIx019368@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-XML-Stream https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191523 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-05-22 21:13 EST ------- From: Ryan Eatmon To: Chris Weyl Date: May 22, 2006 6:03 PM Subject: Re: Net::XMPP license question Whatever. I don't actually care one way or the other. Go right ahead. Chris Weyl wrote: > Sorry to keep on bugging you, but would it be OK for me to strip out > the LGPL licensing statements? > > Or is this software triple licensed? e.g. Perl (GPL or Artistic), LGPL? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 23 01:35:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 May 2006 21:35:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192571] Review Request: perl-IO-Null In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605230135.k4N1ZAn9020303@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-IO-Null https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192571 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-05-22 21:27 EST ------- * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. License text not included upstream. * source files match upstream: 54d6084398f8b4e7062660b9ccc835a8 IO-Null-1.01.tar.gz 54d6084398f8b4e7062660b9ccc835a8 IO-Null-1.01.tar.gz-srpm * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: perl(IO::Null) = 1.01 perl-IO-Null = 1.01-1.fc6 - perl >= 1:5 perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8) perl(IO::Handle) perl(strict) perl(vars) * no shared libraries are present. * package is not relocatable. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * %clean is present. * %check is present and all tests pass: All tests successful. Files=2, Tests=5, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.02 cusr + 0.02 csys = 0.04 CPU) * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no libtool .la droppings. * not a GUI app. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 23 02:11:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 May 2006 22:11:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191605] Review Request: lineak_defaultplugin - default actions for lineakd In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605230211.k4N2B9AS023380@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lineak_defaultplugin - default actions for lineakd https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191605 ------- Additional Comments From lists at forevermore.net 2006-05-22 22:03 EST ------- More changes, ala request: http://rpm.forevermore.net/lineak/lineak-defaultplugin.spec http://rpm.forevermore.net/lineak/lineak-defaultplugin-0.8.4-3.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 23 02:11:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 May 2006 22:11:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192574] Review Request: perl-Data-Structure-Util In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605230211.k4N2BNvJ023411@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Data-Structure-Util https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192574 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |tibbs at math.uh.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 23 02:13:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 May 2006 22:13:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191606] Review Request: lineak_kdeplugins - KDE-based actions for lineakd In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605230213.k4N2DaRa023592@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lineak_kdeplugins - KDE-based actions for lineakd https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191606 ------- Additional Comments From lists at forevermore.net 2006-05-22 22:06 EST ------- More changes, ala request: http://rpm.forevermore.net/lineak/lineak-kdeplugins.spec http://rpm.forevermore.net/lineak/lineak-kdeplugins-0.8.4-3.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 23 02:13:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 May 2006 22:13:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191607] Review Request: lineak_xosdplugin - Onscreen display support for lineakd In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605230213.k4N2DujH023626@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lineak_xosdplugin - Onscreen display support for lineakd https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191607 ------- Additional Comments From lists at forevermore.net 2006-05-22 22:06 EST ------- More changes, ala request: http://rpm.forevermore.net/lineak/lineak-xosdplugin.spec http://rpm.forevermore.net/lineak/lineak-xosdplugin-0.8.4-3.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 23 02:43:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 May 2006 22:43:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187621] Review Request: blam In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605230243.k4N2hCv2026214@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: blam https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187621 ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2006-05-22 22:35 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > > %find_lang, but it doesn't work, no translations found. > > Is that on x86_64? > > If so, are any of the *gettext configure checks failing for you? > In that case you need to patch the configure script, or get > upstream to use better macros, such as those that come with > glib2-devel's /usr/share/aclocal/glib-gettext.m4. Older macros > use insufficient C casts, which cause the tests to fail. > Yes, actually. Are these symptoms? checking for ngettext in libc... no checking for ngettext in -lintl... no -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 23 02:45:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 May 2006 22:45:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192574] Review Request: perl-Data-Structure-Util In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605230245.k4N2jVPe026529@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Data-Structure-Util https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192574 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-05-22 22:37 EST ------- * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. License text not included upstream. * source files match upstream: 3cbec998cd7c55b1244b3f782569b552 Data-Structure-Util-0.11.tar.gz 3cbec998cd7c55b1244b3f782569b552 Data-Structure-Util-0.11.tar.gz-srpm * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: Util.so()(64bit) perl(Data::Structure::Util) = 0.11 perl-Data-Structure-Util = 0.11-1.fc6 - perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8) perl(AutoLoader) perl(Data::Dumper) perl(Digest::MD5) perl(DynaLoader) perl(Exporter) perl(strict) perl(vars) perl(warnings::register) * shared libraries are present, but internal to Perl so no need to call ldconfig. * package is not relocatable. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * %clean is present. * %check is present and all tests pass: All tests successful. Files=10, Tests=126, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.46 cusr + 0.18 csys = 0.64 CPU) * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no libtool .la droppings. * not a GUI app. * no ninjas APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 23 02:54:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 May 2006 22:54:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189195] Review Request: horde - php application framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605230254.k4N2smpI027418@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: horde - php application framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189195 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-05-22 22:47 EST ------- I'd really like to see this go in (because it would save me a massive amount of time), but aren't there a huge number of prerequisite Pear modules that need to be packaged first and be made prerequisites of this package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 23 03:34:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 May 2006 23:34:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187243] Review Request: lazarus : IDE and RAD tool for the free pascal compiler (fpc) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605230334.k4N3YZ2q029693@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lazarus : IDE and RAD tool for the free pascal compiler (fpc) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187243 jpmahowald at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |jpmahowald at gmail.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2006-05-22 23:27 EST ------- Not building on devel x86_64. Free Pascal Compiler version 2.0.2 [2006/03/13] for x86_64 Copyright (c) 1993-2005 by Florian Klaempfl Target OS: Linux for x86-64 Compiling dbflaz.pas Compiling registerdbf.pas Fatal: Can't find unit Dbf Fatal: Compilation aborted make[2]: *** [dbflaz.ppu] Error 1 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 23 03:54:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 May 2006 23:54:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191605] Review Request: lineak_defaultplugin - default actions for lineakd In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605230354.k4N3sOO7030899@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lineak_defaultplugin - default actions for lineakd https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191605 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-05-22 23:46 EST ------- This fails to build in mock on both i386 and x86_64; I have no idea why. The build log ends with: checking Looking for lineak headers... /usr/include/lineak checking for X... no checking for ac_check_lineak in -llineak... no configure: error: lib lineak not found. Please install lineakd 0.8 or later. error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.60358 (%build) I have verified that /usr/lib(64)?/liblineak.so exists and the ac_check_lineak symbol is there. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 23 04:46:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 00:46:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188574] Review Request: rss-glx -- Really Slick Screensavers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605230446.k4N4kmbO032592@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rss-glx -- Really Slick Screensavers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188574 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-05-23 00:39 EST ------- Thanks; your method for generating the fixed tarball is quite nice. You might consider being a bit more descriptive in %description. Perhaps something like: A port of the Really Slick Screensavers to GLX. Provides several visually impressive and graphically intensive screensavers. Note that this package contains only the display hacks themselves; you will need to install the appropriate subpackage for your desktop environment in order to use them as screensavers. (Or whatever; I'm making this up on the spot. The point is that people won't understand what is meant by "contains only the hacks themselves".) The permissions on rss-glx-rm-matrixview.sh are 0775, which is a bit odd (and rpmlint complains about it). Executable documentation is generally frowned upon and rpmlint also complains about it (because your documentation pulls in an additional /bin/bash dependency). I would recommend just installing it 0644 and leave it at that. Other rpmlint warnings are bogus as previously addressed. Is there any reason to package rss-glx_install.pl? This pulls in an odd perl(strict) dependency but not a plain perl dependency, which looks a bit odd. (I know perl provides perl(strict), but perl probably shouldn't be needed at all.) You use $RPM_BUILD_ROOT in some places and %buildroot in others. The packaging guidelines require one or the other to be used consistently. Review: * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. X specfile is properly named and is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * dist tag is present. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. License text included in package. O source files don't match upsteam due to removal of unacceptable content. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). X rpmlint complains about the executable rm-matrixview script. ? final provides are fine; requires are a bit odd: rss-glx = 0.8.1-0.3.fc6 - /bin/bash /usr/bin/env libGL.so.1()(64bit) libGLU.so.1()(64bit) libICE.so.6()(64bit) libSM.so.6()(64bit) libX11.so.6()(64bit) libalut.so.0()(64bit) libbz2.so.1()(64bit) libc.so.6()(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1()(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0)(64bit) libm.so.6()(64bit) libm.so.6(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit) libopenal.so.0()(64bit) libstdc++.so.6()(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3)(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(GLIBCXX_3.4)(64bit) ? perl(strict) * no shared libraries are present. * package is not relocatable. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. X file permissions are appropriate (ok except for mode 770 rss-glx-rm-matrixview.sh * %clean is present * %check is not present; no test suite upstream. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no libtool .la droppings. O not a GUI app. (Well, sort of; special desktop files for each environment are included, but the hacks aren't indended to be run directly.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 23 07:51:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 03:51:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 183912] Review Request: jack-audio-connection-kit - The Jack Audio Connection Kit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605230751.k4N7pI8Z007727@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jack-audio-connection-kit - The Jack Audio Connection Kit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183912 andy at smile.org.ua changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|Package Review |aalib ------- Additional Comments From andy at smile.org.ua 2006-05-23 03:43 EST ------- Sorry for my silence - bugzilla was down for me. John, I've done all propositions in last update. Is it indicate that any reviewer can approve this package now? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 23 07:53:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 03:53:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 183912] Review Request: jack-audio-connection-kit - The Jack Audio Connection Kit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605230753.k4N7rZUv007896@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jack-audio-connection-kit - The Jack Audio Connection Kit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183912 andy at smile.org.ua changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|aalib |Package Review -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 23 08:06:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 04:06:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191582] Review Request: xgalaga - Galaga clone for X11 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605230806.k4N86Q07011958@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xgalaga - Galaga clone for X11 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191582 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-05-23 03:59 EST ------- Chris and I had a private discussion about this by email because BZ was down, copy and pasting it here for future reference: --- Hi Chris, Bugzilla is down so I'm doing it this way. Thanks for the review. About the missing BR I failed to add that its needed for the devel branch too, things just worked on my system because I already had the needed devel-package installed. About the name, I wans't sure about this myself, so now I've changed the name to xgalaxy (googled, not taken already). New SRPM and spec are at: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/ Regards, Hans --- Christopher Stone wrote: > okay ill take a look at this tomorrow, been really busy today and > didnt get the chance to look at it. > > Do you think the name is going to be a problem? I'd prefer xgalaga, > but then again, it's probably better to be safe than sorry. > The name is most likely not a problem, because the people with the rights to the original name probably don't care. xgalaga has existed under this name for a long time without trouble. Then again the name had both me and you worried and those are valid worries the name is a legal problem. Even if the other party _probably_ doesn't care it still is a legal issue. It is the _probably_ that scares me and untill the "upto now" part of upto now this hasn't been a problem. If the people with the rights to the name one day all of a sudden do start caring, or get a grudge against OSS we've a problem, which I would rather avoid. Since I've already done the hard work of renaming (and recreating the "logo") I think its best / safest to stick with the new name. Regards, Hans -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 23 09:30:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 05:30:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 184331] Review Request: K-3D - 3D modeling and rendering system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605230930.k4N9Uiae017535@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: K-3D - 3D modeling and rendering system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=184331 ------- Additional Comments From gemi at bluewin.ch 2006-05-23 05:23 EST ------- gts is now released in Extras. Please update the srpm to the new version with gts included. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 23 09:33:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 05:33:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190040] Review Request: hydrogen - Advanced drum machine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605230933.k4N9XKQZ017724@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hydrogen - Advanced drum machine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190040 ------- Additional Comments From seg at haxxed.com 2006-05-23 05:25 EST ------- MUST items: - rpmlint: Ok? $ rpmlint hydrogen-0.9.3-4.fc5.i386.rpm E: hydrogen shared-lib-without-dependency-information /usr/lib/hydrogen/plugins/wasp_xshaper.so E: hydrogen shared-lib-without-dependency-information /usr/lib/hydrogen/plugins/wasp_noisifier.so E: hydrogen shared-lib-without-dependency-information /usr/lib/hydrogen/plugins/wasp_booster.so $ ldd /usr/lib/hydrogen/plugins/* /usr/lib/hydrogen/plugins/wasp_booster.so: statically linked /usr/lib/hydrogen/plugins/wasp_noisifier.so: statically linked /usr/lib/hydrogen/plugins/wasp_xshaper.so: statically linked Statically linked dynamic libraries? That's a new one to me. These are apparently LADSPA plugins. Perhaps these should go in %{_libdir}/ladspa instead. And even go in a "hydrogen-wasp-plugins" subpackage. - Package name: Ok - Spec name: Ok - Meets packaging guidelines: Ok - License: Ok - Spec in American English: Ok - Spec legible: Ok - Sources match upstream: Ok - Builds: Ok - BuildRequires: Ok - Locales: Ok - ldconfig: NEEDSWORK - Relocation: Ok - Directory ownership: Ok - %files: Ok - %clean: Ok - Macros: Ok - Code vs. Content: Ok - Documentation: Ok - devel package: Ok - .desktop file: Ok SHOULD: - Includes license text: Ok - Mock build: Yes - Builds on all archs: Built on i386, x86_64 - Package functional: Yes! http://www.haxxed.com/music/909fun.ogg - Scriptlets: NEEDSWORK - Subpackages: Ok NEEDSWORK: Source0 should be a full URL. It should be http://dl.sf.net/sourceforge/hydrogen/hydrogen-0.9.3.tar.gz You have a lingering buildreq on portaudio-devel. I would recommend disabling OSS support. (%configure --disable-oss-support) AFAIK OSS has been deprecated for some time now. I don't think you need all that QTDIR stuff. It seems to build just fine without it. Mock sources profile.d properly. I don't think you need to update the icon cache, its not installing any into /usr/share/icons Don't need ldconfig, its not installing systemwide libraries. The update-desktop-database doesn't match what's in ScriptletSnippets, and according to ScriptletSnippets, you only need it if there's a MimeType key. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 23 10:03:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 06:03:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187243] Review Request: lazarus : IDE and RAD tool for the free pascal compiler (fpc) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605231003.k4NA3IqV019162@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lazarus : IDE and RAD tool for the free pascal compiler (fpc) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187243 ------- Additional Comments From joost at cnoc.nl 2006-05-23 05:55 EST ------- Thanks for looking at it! The problem you've found is more a bug in fpc, actually. The tDbf package isn't included/compiled on X86_64 and powerpc in fpc-2.0.2. Here's a workaround. It only compiles the basic IDE without the extra packages, like tDbf. Maybe it's even better, since some of the extra components are somewhat buggy. And if an end-user needs them, he can install them himself. Spec: http://www.cnoc.nl/fpc/lazarus.spec SRPM: http://www.cnoc.nl/fpc/lazarus-0.9.14-4.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 23 10:06:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 06:06:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 183912] Review Request: jack-audio-connection-kit - The Jack Audio Connection Kit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605231006.k4NA6qJ9019331@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jack-audio-connection-kit - The Jack Audio Connection Kit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183912 ------- Additional Comments From seg at haxxed.com 2006-05-23 05:59 EST ------- I think the implication is John approves. :) Shouldn't this block FE-ACCEPT now? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 23 10:15:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 06:15:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177580] Review Request: lat (LDAP Administration Tool) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605231015.k4NAF6Md019667@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lat (LDAP Administration Tool) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177580 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-05-23 06:07 EST ------- I have an updated lat 1.0.5 package that any potential maintainer of this package might like to start with: http://www.city-fan.org/~paul/extras/lat/ It builds fine in mock, though I've only tried i386. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 23 10:56:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 06:56:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 173459] Review Request: initng In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605231056.k4NAu3UN022172@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 ------- Additional Comments From che666 at gmail.com 2006-05-23 06:48 EST ------- 0.0.5 ifiles have been release since a while now... http://download.initng.org/initng-ifiles/v0.0/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 23 11:20:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 07:20:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187621] Review Request: blam In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605231120.k4NBK8hC023215@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: blam https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187621 ------- Additional Comments From bugs.michael at gmx.net 2006-05-23 07:12 EST ------- Yes. In config.log is the info about how it failed. Casting to (int) where that doesn't work on 64-bit platforms. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 23 12:00:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 08:00:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192546] Review Request: gnubiff In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605231200.k4NC0klu025476@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnubiff https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192546 ------- Additional Comments From gauret at free.fr 2006-05-23 07:53 EST ------- Everything looks OK, but how about enabling GNOME support ? It looks like it can be embedded in the panel this way. It'd be a nice feature to have IMHO. By the way, version 2.2.1 is out. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 23 14:08:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 10:08:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192568] Review Request: perl-File-Type In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605231408.k4NE8t1O002348@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-File-Type https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192568 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-05-23 10:01 EST ------- For some reason I didn't see the bugzilla announcement about your comment. Sorry for not responding eariler. Thanks for excising the ninjas. I think the reasoun Module::Build showed up in the dependencies was because I somehow pulled in the requirements of the src.rpm as well; my fault. Everything looks good now. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 23 14:14:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 10:14:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192546] Review Request: gnubiff In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605231414.k4NEEM4N002669@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnubiff https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192546 ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at ameritech.net 2006-05-23 10:06 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > Everything looks OK, but how about enabling GNOME support ? It looks like it can > be embedded in the panel this way. It'd be a nice feature to have IMHO. > > By the way, version 2.2.1 is out. > In addition to the GNOME support, it looks like it also has some SSL/crypto support that would be worthwile to enable. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 23 14:18:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 10:18:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 183912] Review Request: jack-audio-connection-kit - The Jack Audio Connection Kit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605231418.k4NEIEB4002925@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jack-audio-connection-kit - The Jack Audio Connection Kit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183912 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-05-23 10:10 EST ------- At this point nobody has even signed on to review this package. It's still unassigned and blocking FE-NEW. Andy, have you applied for cvsextras membership yet? I don't recall seeing the request for sponsorship. In case you need them istructions are at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/Contributors#head-a89c07b5b8abe7748b6b39f0f89768d595234907 John has agreed to sponsor you, so you should go ahead and apply. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 23 14:29:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 10:29:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190040] Review Request: hydrogen - Advanced drum machine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605231429.k4NET3Kr003875@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hydrogen - Advanced drum machine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190040 ------- Additional Comments From hugo at devin.com.br 2006-05-23 10:21 EST ------- (In reply to comment #8) > Source0 should be a full URL. It should be > http://dl.sf.net/sourceforge/hydrogen/hydrogen-0.9.3.tar.gz Discussing this in IRC some people realized that dl.sf.net is not always available (as it is a dns round-robin load-balance). In experience, some said that the easynews mirror never gets trouble so using it is better in general. I'm using it on some specs, so maybe you should consider using it too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 23 14:45:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 10:45:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187818] Review Request: ktorrent : KDE bittorrent client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605231445.k4NEjb8t006020@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ktorrent : KDE bittorrent client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187818 ------- Additional Comments From wolters.liste at gmx.net 2006-05-23 10:38 EST ------- The new version is still in beta, so I would prefer to wait until it is released as a final version because Fedora Core 5 is a final version. It would be nice if there are some documents which point out when it is ok to update to beta versions. About the FC5 packages on the homepage: these have been build by me. Where do you think do we still need help in compliance of the spec file? The above spec file was discussed and every problem has been solved as far as I see it. Please be more specific about problems or areas where you see a lack of compliance. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 23 14:51:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 10:51:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192564] Review Request: uuid In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605231451.k4NEpTMq006832@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: uuid https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192564 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |tibbs at math.uh.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 23 14:54:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 10:54:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188574] Review Request: rss-glx -- Really Slick Screensavers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605231454.k4NEsOjo007309@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rss-glx -- Really Slick Screensavers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188574 ------- Additional Comments From nphilipp at redhat.com 2006-05-23 10:46 EST ------- (In reply to comment #6) > You might consider being a bit more descriptive in %description. Perhaps > something like: > > A port of the Really Slick Screensavers to GLX. Provides several visually > impressive and graphically intensive screensavers. > > Note that this package contains only the display hacks themselves; you will need > to install the appropriate subpackage for your desktop environment in order to > use them as screensavers. > > (Or whatever; I'm making this up on the spot. The point is that people won't > understand what is meant by "contains only the hacks themselves".) Thanks, I've updated the description blocks accordingly. > The permissions on rss-glx-rm-matrixview.sh are 0775, which is a bit odd (and > rpmlint complains about it). Executable documentation is generally frowned upon > and rpmlint also complains about it (because your documentation pulls in an > additional /bin/bash dependency). I would recommend just installing it 0644 and > leave it at that. Done. > Is there any reason to package rss-glx_install.pl? This pulls in an odd > perl(strict) dependency but not a plain perl dependency, which looks a bit odd. > (I know perl provides perl(strict), but perl probably shouldn't be needed at all.) Not necessary and removed. > You use $RPM_BUILD_ROOT in some places and %buildroot in others. The packaging > guidelines require one or the other to be used consistently. Fixed. The new files are at the usual locations with the new SRPM at: http://tiptoe.de/dav/rss-glx-0.8.1-0.4.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 23 14:57:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 10:57:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187818] Review Request: ktorrent : KDE bittorrent client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605231457.k4NEvsw0007741@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ktorrent : KDE bittorrent client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187818 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-05-23 10:50 EST ------- I'd say this is approve-worthy (or very close to it). Now, all you need is a sponsor. p.s. Small item: you can safely omit Requires(post): desktop-file-utils Requires(postun): desktop-file-utils IMO, the Scriptlets wiki is wrong to suggest including this. I'll leave it as an exercise for the reader to determine what happens when/if desktop-file-utils isn't installed when ktorrent is. (: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 23 14:59:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 10:59:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187818] Review Request: ktorrent : KDE bittorrent client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605231459.k4NEx3GZ007839@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ktorrent : KDE bittorrent client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187818 ------- Additional Comments From wolters.liste at gmx.net 2006-05-23 10:51 EST ------- To add a note about the fc5-files: the ktorrent-1.2 files are done be me, I just saw that there are now also packages for ktorrent 2.0beta, these are not done by me. I had a look into the spec files though, but I do not really see where these are superior by the ones I provided here: - there is no hicolor handling - the *.la files are installed - no desktop-database handling because of mimetype in ktorrent.desktop - the buildrequires are missing gmp-devel Please be more specific about why you think that the spec files here provided shouldn't be good enough. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 23 15:09:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 11:09:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187818] Review Request: ktorrent : KDE bittorrent client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605231509.k4NF9EXd008564@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ktorrent : KDE bittorrent client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187818 ------- Additional Comments From hugo at devin.com.br 2006-05-23 11:01 EST ------- (In reply to comment #13) > Please be more specific about why you think that the spec files here > provided shouldn't be good enough. Sorry, I didn't mean to say this. I was suggesting that you could update your specfile to ktorrent's 2.0beta version, not to replace your spec with the other :) But as you explained, let's wait for the final version to update. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 23 15:35:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 11:35:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188574] Review Request: rss-glx -- Really Slick Screensavers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605231535.k4NFZmNV010458@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rss-glx -- Really Slick Screensavers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188574 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-05-23 11:28 EST ------- Things are looking good now. One new rpmlint warning (a line in %description is too long). However, I went to test this on a couple of i386 FC5 machines under KDE (so rss-glx and rss-glx-kde are installed); the hacks display when run directly (they open a small window in the background) but as KDE screensavers there are some issues: They show up at the bottom of the list, not filed under "OpenGL Screen Savers". Maybe they should have their own place in the hierarchy? ("Really Slick Screen Savers"?) I think you do this by using X-KDE-Category= in the desktop file. It's probably also worth using X-KDE-Type=OpenGL as well. But it looks like you're just using the desktop files supplied by upstream here; I'm not sure if it's worth it to hack them up. The desktop files include "Actions=InWindow;Root" but then go on to define a Setup action as well. The setup page for each screensaver doesn't work at all unless you also install rss-glx-screensaver. Should this be a dependency of rss-glx-kde, or is something else wrong? The screensavers don't actually do anything; the "Test" button causes the desktop to pause (system monitor and clock stop updating), but nothing is actually displayed. This happens on my home machine with binary Nvidia driver and a machine here at work with a Radeon R200 (stock X driver). Any ideas? So at this point the form of the package is fine; you just need to fix that overlong line in %description. Unfortunately there's still some debugging to be done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 23 16:27:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 12:27:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189195] Review Request: horde - php application framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605231627.k4NGRSnV014063@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: horde - php application framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189195 ------- Additional Comments From dlutter at redhat.com 2006-05-23 12:19 EST ------- A while ago, I packaged horde and horde-nag for recreational use. Packages and specfiles can be found at http://people.redhat.com/dlutter/puppet-app/; the packages did work for deploying horde automatically with puppet (http://people.redhat.com/dlutter/puppet-app.html) Hope you'll find them useful for finishing up this package. From a quick look at the specfile, you need to add at least php-pear-Mail_Mime and php-pear-Log as dependencies for horde, and possibly php-pear-DB for any of the horde applications. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 23 17:08:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 13:08:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192119] Review Request: tuxkart - Kids 3D go-kart racing game featuring Tux In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605231708.k4NH8rAY016471@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tuxkart - Kids 3D go-kart racing game featuring Tux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192119 ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2006-05-23 13:01 EST ------- Ignore my previous build failure on devel. I had mangled my plib package. Here's a formal review: MUST ==== * rpmlint output clean * Package named appropriately * Spec file legible and in Am. English * Builds and packages on FC-4 x86_64 * Source matches upstream: e84ab2748ff1ce5ef11d1d7da5188f8f tuxkart-0.4.0.tar.gz * $RPM_BUILD_ROOT cleaned appropriately * Owns all files that it creates * GPL license ok, license file included * No -devel package needed * No need for -docs subpackage * No shared libaries * Not relocatable * No locale files * .desktop file installed correctly * No duplicate %files MUSTFIX ======= * BR: ImageMagick doesn't seem to be necessary. * Replace the offending images per comment #3. In reply to comment #4, I think these need to be in a new source tarball so that they aren't in the SRPM either. The SRPMS get distributed just like the binary RPMs, so the same rules should apply to make sure they don't contain questionable material. SHOULD ====== * aclocal, automake, and autoconf all get run due to inter-build file dependencies. This happens because /Makefile.in all depend on configure.in, which gets patched during %prep. I suggest adding the following at the end of %prep to shave a few seconds off of the build time: touch aclocal.m4 touch */Makefile.in -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 23 17:19:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 13:19:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192546] Review Request: gnubiff In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605231719.k4NHJKtK017221@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnubiff https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192546 ------- Additional Comments From splinux at fedoraproject.org 2006-05-23 13:11 EST ------- - Upgrade to 2.2.1 - Add --prefix='pkg-config libpanelapplet-2.0 openssl --variable=prefix in %con$ - Add gnome-panel-devel, openssl-devel in BuildRequires Changes available: http://glive.tuxfamily.org/fedora/gnubiff/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 23 17:43:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 13:43:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188359] Review Request: bugzilla - bug tracking tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605231743.k4NHhwwm018960@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bugzilla - bug tracking tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188359 ------- Additional Comments From jwb at redhat.com 2006-05-23 13:36 EST ------- Oops... it seems I've not kept up. Apologies, my bugzilla mail started going to a mailbox I wasn't paying attention to. Give me a few days to catch myself up... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 23 18:14:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 14:14:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192867] New: Review Request: ctorrent - BitTorrent Client written in C Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192867 Summary: Review Request: ctorrent - BitTorrent Client written in C Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: bluekuja at ubuntu.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.netservers.org/packages/rpm/ctorrent.spec SRPM URL: http://www.netservers.org/packages/rpm/ctorrent-1.3.2-1.src.rpm Description: CTorrent is built as a console program, which means that it doesn't require any graphical components (such as an X server) on the machine you are running it on, you can even run it remotely through a terminal if you wish. While a lot of people prefer a GUI (Graphical User Interface) for this kind of applications, there are quite a few people who run "console only" servers and want to use them to download files in the background. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 23 18:41:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 14:41:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191017] Review Request: subclipse In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605231841.k4NIfaMR023601@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: subclipse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191017 overholt at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |overholt at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From overholt at redhat.com 2006-05-23 14:34 EST ------- Is anyone opposed to following the convention of calling things eclipse-? I agree that in cases like subclipse it's a bit annoying but we can add Provides: subclipse. Thoughts? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 23 18:46:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 14:46:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188359] Review Request: bugzilla - bug tracking tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605231846.k4NIk5Xl024255@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bugzilla - bug tracking tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188359 ------- Additional Comments From jwb at redhat.com 2006-05-23 14:38 EST ------- OK, packages updated with (I think) all input above. Specifically: - shifted /usr/local path handling - redid provides/requires filtering - updated to upstream 2.22 - split off contrib/ into -contrib package (but still installing it in /var/www/bugzilla/contrib) SPEC: http://www.berningeronline.net/bugzilla.spec SRPM: http://www.berningeronline.net/bugzilla-2.22-0.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 23 18:49:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 14:49:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191016] Review Request: svn-client-adapter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605231849.k4NInlmq024877@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: svn-client-adapter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191016 ------- Additional Comments From bkonrath at redhat.com 2006-05-23 14:42 EST ------- According the subclipse authors, svn-client-adapter isn't actually released separately so this should be rolled into the subclipse rpm: http://svn.haxx.se/subdev/archive-2006-05/0015.shtml If another project ends up using it, we can make a subpackage, but until then I think it should just be included with subclipse. What do you think? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 23 19:13:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 15:13:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192876] New: Review Request: V2Strip ID3v2(Mp3 Files) tags remover Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192876 Summary: Review Request: V2Strip ID3v2(Mp3 Files) tags remover Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: bluekuja at ubuntu.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.netservers.org/packages/rpm/v2strip.spec SRPM URL: http://www.netservers.org/packages/rpm/v2strip-0.2.10-1.src.rpm Description: Little utility that removes ID3v2 tags from MP3 files. The new ID3v2 tag format is nice in many ways, but it can cause confusion when parsed by certain MP3 players/utilities not yet supporting ID3v2 tags. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 23 19:20:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 15:20:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192867] Review Request: ctorrent - BitTorrent Client written in C In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605231920.k4NJKREf027394@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ctorrent - BitTorrent Client written in C https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192867 ------- Additional Comments From yaneti at declera.com 2006-05-23 15:12 EST ------- disclaimer: I hold none of the official fedora credentials, so take my comments as random joe observations. Your spec file fails many of the basic requirements listed in http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines See "Writing a package from scratch" section for how to produce a basic specfile using an existing template which should help produce something not so far off the mark. Here are some of the more major omissions: - no URL tag - source tag is not a url to the canonical upstream source. - no explicit buildroot - the description spills over 80 characters a line and has text mostly comprised of advocacy rather than descritopn. - doesn't use standard macros as %configure, %makeinstall thus resulting in an install to /usr/local, which is a big no no for fedora. - no changelog - no spaces, resulting i poor readability. A more detailed review will possibly follow after these basic things are taken care of. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 23 19:34:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 15:34:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192546] Review Request: gnubiff In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605231934.k4NJYPx9028991@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnubiff https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192546 bdpepple at ameritech.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at ameritech.net 2006-05-23 15:26 EST ------- MD5Sums: 8d2ef679f42e7a593dc88b750d0cca4c gnubiff-2.2.1.tar.gz Good: * Source URL is canonical * Upstream source tarball verified * Package name conforms to the Fedora Naming Guidelines * Group Tag is from the official list * Buildroot has all required elements * All paths begin with macros * All directories are owned by this or other packages * All necessary BuildRequires listed. * All desired features are enabled * Package builds in Mock. * Package installs and uninstalls cleanly on FC5. * rpmlint produces no error. Bad: * Don't pass '--prefix=`pkg-config libpanelapplet-2.0 openssl --variable=prefix`' to the %configure macro. It's not needed. Minor: * In the file section, '%{_datadir}/info' should be '%{_infodir}'. Refer to http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/RPMMacros * Unnecessary documentation: ABOUT-NLS & Changelog. The first is a generic build tools file, and the second is duplicate information that is included in the NEWS file. Once these items are fixed, considered this approved. +1 Approve -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 23 19:37:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 15:37:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 183912] Review Request: jack-audio-connection-kit - The Jack Audio Connection Kit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605231937.k4NJbmJ8029343@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jack-audio-connection-kit - The Jack Audio Connection Kit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183912 ------- Additional Comments From seg at haxxed.com 2006-05-23 15:30 EST ------- Well, I would have, but FESCo recently made explicit statements that I shouldn't if I'm not a sponsor. I suppose now that he's sponsored I can do it... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 23 19:54:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 15:54:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192884] New: Review Request: poedit - GUI editor for GNU gettext .po files Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192884 Summary: Review Request: poedit - GUI editor for GNU gettext .po files Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: icon at fedoraproject.org QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://blues.mcgill.ca/~icon/fe/poedit.spec SRPM URL: http://blues.mcgill.ca/~icon/fe/poedit-1.3.4-1.src.rpm Description: This program is GUI frontend to GNU Gettext utilities and catalogs editor/source code parser. It helps with translating application into another language. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 23 20:11:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 16:11:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188359] Review Request: bugzilla - bug tracking tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605232011.k4NKBnop000461@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bugzilla - bug tracking tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188359 ------- Additional Comments From nkadel at comcast.net 2006-05-23 16:04 EST ------- I'm looking at the bugzilla-httpd-conf: I really don't think it needs the +FollowSymLinks or the +Indexes options. I haven't needed them in any of the Bugzillas I've installed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 23 20:14:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 16:14:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192889] New: Review Request: openais standards based cluster framework Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192889 Summary: Review Request: openais standards based cluster framework Product: Fedora Core Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: notting at redhat.com ReportedBy: sdake at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://developer.osdl.org/dev/openais/SRPM/openais.spec SRPM URL: http://developer.osdl.org/dev/openais/SRPM/openais-0.75-1.0.src.rpm Description: This request is for Fedora Core 6. The openais standards based cluster framework is a system for clustering infrastructure and also APIs for developing clustering applications. The cman package (targeted for FC6) depends upon the openais package. Also, the RHCS code all depends on cman. Hence for clustering to be a part of FC 6 this package is required. I have followed the packaging guidelines as closely as possible. I have also run rpmlint (with some strange complaints about the init script). Your comments welcome. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 23 20:18:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 16:18:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192889] Review Request: openais standards based cluster framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605232018.k4NKIGMw000901@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: openais standards based cluster framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192889 sdake at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |cfeist at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From sdake at redhat.com 2006-05-23 16:10 EST ------- Added Chris as CC. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 23 20:24:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 16:24:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192564] Review Request: uuid In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605232024.k4NKOHV4001407@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: uuid https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192564 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-05-23 16:16 EST ------- I think the license is essentially the MIT license: http://www.opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.php It's probably a better fit than "Distributable". rpmlint, as usual, finds something to complain about: E: uuid binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/uuid ['/usr/lib64'] W: uuid unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/libuuid.so.14.0.22 W: uuid-c++ unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/libuuid++.so.14.0.22 W: uuid-c++ no-documentation W: uuid-dce unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/libuuid_dce.so.14.0.22 W: uuid-dce no-documentation W: uuid-dce-devel no-documentation W: uuid-pgsql no-documentation W: uuid-php no-documentation The no-documentation ones are OK. The unstripped object warnings are problematic; I don't know what to do about those. The rpath problem can be made to go away by adding: BuildRequires: libtool then changing the make line to: make LIBTOOL=/usr/bin/libtool %{?_smp_mflags} and then adding this after the make install: rm -f $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_libdir}/*.a * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * dist tag is present. ? license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. License text included in package. * source files match upstream: fdfe93bc134dfb73814456c3b444dda1 uuid-1.4.2.tar.gz fdfe93bc134dfb73814456c3b444dda1 uuid-1.4.2.tar.gz-srpm * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. (I didn't realize you could list them in the subpackage declarations.) * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). X rpmlint complains of rpath and unstripped libraries. * final provides and requires are sane. * shared libraries are present; ldconfig is called where necessary. (Some libraries are internal to Perl, PHP, pgsql, etc. so ldconfig is not called for those packages.) Unversioned libraries are in -devel subpackages. * packages are not relocatable. * own the directories they creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * %clean is present. * %check is present and all tests seem to pass. * scriptlets present and quite sane. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * headers are in -devel subpackages. * no pkgconfig files. * no libtool .la droppings. * not a GUI app. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 23 20:25:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 16:25:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192889] Review Request: openais standards based cluster framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605232025.k4NKPUsV001531@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: openais standards based cluster framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192889 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rdieter at math.unl.edu ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-05-23 16:17 EST ------- A few initial comments: * omit static libs. If there's good reason to include, please add comment in specfile to justify inclusion * IMO, not enough docs here to warrant a separate package, but those bits where appropriate either in main pkg or -devel. * Why are libs placed in %{_libdir}/openais/ which forces use of ld.so.conf.d/ instead of simply putting in %{_libdir}? * use %%{_initrddir} macro instead of hard-coding /etc/rc.d/init.d * There seem to be %{_libdir}/openais/lib*.so symlinks not packaged (in -devel?) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 23 20:27:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 16:27:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192889] Review Request: openais standards based cluster framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605232027.k4NKRHCJ001801@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: openais standards based cluster framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192889 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-05-23 16:19 EST ------- *Usually* pkgs that include shared libs include in main pkg (something like): %{libdir}/lib*.so.* and in -devel: %{_libdir}/lib*.so -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 23 20:28:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 16:28:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192889] Review Request: openais standards based cluster framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605232028.k4NKSLEj001944@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: openais standards based cluster framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192889 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-05-23 16:20 EST ------- Unowned dirs: %{_libdir}/openais/ %{_libdir}/openais/lcrso/ %{_includedir}/openais/ %{_includedir}/openais/lcr -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 23 20:35:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 16:35:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191017] Review Request: subclipse In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605232035.k4NKZvbM002636@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: subclipse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191017 ------- Additional Comments From bkonrath at redhat.com 2006-05-23 16:28 EST ------- I think using eclipse-subclipse would be a good idea. We used eclipse-phpeclipse in RHEL and it would be nice to be consistent with package names. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 23 20:45:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 16:45:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191017] Review Request: subclipse In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605232045.k4NKjj1Z003673@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: subclipse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191017 ------- Additional Comments From bkonrath at redhat.com 2006-05-23 16:38 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=129890) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=129890&action=view) updated spec file Here's an updated the spec with the following changes: changelog * Tue May 23 2006 Ben Konrath 1.0.1-3 - Rename package to eclispe-subclipse. - Use copy-platform script for now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 23 20:49:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 16:49:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 175433] Review Request: tor - Anonymizing overlay network for TCP (The onion router) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605232049.k4NKnmnT004009@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tor - Anonymizing overlay network for TCP (The onion router) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175433 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From roozbeh at farsiweb.info 2006-05-23 16:42 EST ------- After installating the RPM resulting from comment #21, "torify" will fail with the following error message: /usr/bin/torify: line 7: exec: tsocks: not found You probably need a Requires: on tsocks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 23 20:52:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 16:52:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192119] Review Request: tuxkart - Kids 3D go-kart racing game featuring Tux In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605232052.k4NKq4Kb004119@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tuxkart - Kids 3D go-kart racing game featuring Tux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192119 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-05-23 16:44 EST ------- Thanks, I'll get back with a new version when I've managed to replace those images. If anyone feels like helping me with that let me know, I'm looking into this but for a pure coder like me this aint easy. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 23 20:58:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 16:58:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192571] Review Request: perl-IO-Null In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605232058.k4NKw1Jw004477@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-IO-Null https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192571 steve at silug.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From steve at silug.org 2006-05-23 16:50 EST ------- Imported into CVS, branches created, and packages built. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 23 20:58:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 16:58:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192575] Review Request: perl-Pipeline In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605232058.k4NKwEP2004519@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Pipeline https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192575 Bug 192575 depends on bug 192571, which changed state. Bug 192571 Summary: Review Request: perl-IO-Null https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192571 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 23 21:05:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 17:05:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192889] Review Request: openais standards based cluster framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605232105.k4NL5FMg004922@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: openais standards based cluster framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192889 ------- Additional Comments From sdake at redhat.com 2006-05-23 16:57 EST ------- Thanks Rex for your review. I've updated the spec file to address these problems and put the patch here http://developer.osdl.org:/dev/openais/SRPM/fix-unowned-dirs.patch Would you review the patch and see if it resolves the problem? I have also updated the spec file and SRPM on the web at the above addresses. Regards -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 23 21:07:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 17:07:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192889] Review Request: openais standards based cluster framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605232107.k4NL7EZ8005093@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: openais standards based cluster framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192889 ------- Additional Comments From sdake at redhat.com 2006-05-23 16:59 EST ------- Rex I have only addressed the unowned dirs problem with comment #5. I'll take a look at the other issues next. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 23 21:08:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 17:08:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188180] Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605232108.k4NL8TMe005199@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188180 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-05-23 17:01 EST ------- 3. Ownership of /usr/lib/qt4/plugins and /usr/lib/qt4/plugins/sqldrivers also looks fishy... shouldn't those be owned by the base qt4 package only? currently the base and all subpackages own that dir. Since all the sub packages require the base qt4, the dir would always be there... (The core package has nothing owning /usr/lib/qt4/plugins/sqldrivers, which isn't right either) All the .pc files look good. Libs look good from here. I'm not seeing any blockers aside from the 2 minor issues in comment #116 and the one mentioned here... Laurent, do you see anything further on x86_64? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 23 21:18:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 17:18:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192889] Review Request: openais standards based cluster framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605232118.k4NLI3Ks005666@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: openais standards based cluster framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192889 ------- Additional Comments From sdake at redhat.com 2006-05-23 17:10 EST ------- Addressing comment #2 point #2 on the topic of documentation, we intend in the community to add about 75-150 man pages in the coming months. Is this suitable for a separate docs package? In planning for the future, this is the motivation behind a separate docs package. I'm not sure how we could later add a docs package to fedora core 6 or offer an upgrade path. Most of these docs are "API" documentation which the user may not want. For the bits that are necessary for configuration and usage (openais_overview.8, openais.conf.5) I could add it to the main pakage. I am happy to remove the docs package and integrate them into the other packages. I just want to follow the guidelines as closely as possible and thought the 150+ man pages may warrant a separate docs package. Your comments on this topic welcome. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 23 21:32:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 17:32:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192889] Review Request: openais standards based cluster framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605232132.k4NLWHvD006574@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: openais standards based cluster framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192889 ------- Additional Comments From sdake at redhat.com 2006-05-23 17:24 EST ------- Addressing comment #2 point #3 on the topic of location of library dirs: Upstream places the files in the separate openais directory. The reason this is done is because it may be that people want to install two competing SA Forum AIS standard implementations (this is what openais provides) on their Fedora system at once. This would cause collisions if they both used /usr/lib allowing only one implementation at a time. The standard specifies the name of the shared objects. We could declare that only openais could be installed on a FC6 system, but I think we would be more friendly if we allowed other vendors to operate on Fedora Core 6 as well. On the topic of ld.so.conf.d, the project uses a component model to load services (that is what those lcrso files are). Upstream doesn't place the lcrso files in the /usr/lib dir since they are not generally useful shared libraries. Either way, ld.so.conf.d must be modified as this is how the component loader finds its components. First it scans the cwd, then /usr/lib then /usr/lib64, then /etc/ld.so.conf (which may have include lines which are then scanned). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 23 21:37:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 17:37:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192889] Review Request: openais standards based cluster framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605232137.k4NLbGUa006852@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: openais standards based cluster framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192889 ------- Additional Comments From sdake at redhat.com 2006-05-23 17:29 EST ------- Addressing comment #3: Do you mean by this comment that I should not list out each individual shared object file, but instead use wildcards? It appears from the many examples I found that each file is listed separately but I could remove all of the separate filenames and then use the wildcard lines. I have no preference either way, although it is somewhat helpful for the package maintainer (me) if the specfile were to complain during build because of a shared object additiion/removal. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 23 21:38:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 17:38:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192867] Review Request: ctorrent - BitTorrent Client written in C In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605232138.k4NLcnVk006984@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ctorrent - BitTorrent Client written in C https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192867 ------- Additional Comments From bluekuja at ubuntu.com 2006-05-23 17:31 EST ------- Problems Fixed, new .spec and .src.rpm files changed. Thanks for reporting it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 23 21:51:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 17:51:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192564] Review Request: uuid In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605232151.k4NLp1Hj007956@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: uuid https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192564 ------- Additional Comments From steve at silug.org 2006-05-23 17:43 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > I think the license is essentially the MIT license: > http://www.opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.php > It's probably a better fit than "Distributable". OK. Fixed in -2. > rpmlint, as usual, finds something to complain about: > > E: uuid binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/uuid ['/usr/lib64'] > W: uuid unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/libuuid.so.14.0.22 > W: uuid-c++ unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/libuuid++.so.14.0.22 > W: uuid-c++ no-documentation > W: uuid-dce unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/libuuid_dce.so.14.0.22 > W: uuid-dce no-documentation > W: uuid-dce-devel no-documentation > W: uuid-pgsql no-documentation > W: uuid-php no-documentation > > The no-documentation ones are OK. Agreed. > The unstripped object warnings are problematic; I don't know what to do about those. I don't either. I'm assuming the auto-strip magic is breaking for some reason, but I can't imagine what that reason is... > The rpath problem can be made to go away by adding: [libtool stuff] I tried that, but I still get the %{_libdir} rpath. Is that really an issue? I fixed a build directory rpath problem in the PHP module, BTW. Trying a similar fix for the %{_libdir} rpath thing (introduced, I'm 99% sure, by a -rpath in Makefile.in) results in a failed build. Well, actually, a failed install. Try adding "sed -i -e 's/ -rpath \$(libdir)//' Makefile.in" to %prep if you want to see what I mean. I might just be dense, but I don't see how to fix the problem. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 23 21:58:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 17:58:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192568] Review Request: perl-File-Type In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605232158.k4NLw4S5008467@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-File-Type https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192568 steve at silug.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From steve at silug.org 2006-05-23 17:50 EST ------- Imported into CVS, branches created, and builds requested. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 23 21:58:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 17:58:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192577] Review Request: perl-OpenFrame In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605232158.k4NLw5B1008479@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-OpenFrame https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192577 Bug 192577 depends on bug 192568, which changed state. Bug 192568 Summary: Review Request: perl-File-Type https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192568 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 23 21:59:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 17:59:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192574] Review Request: perl-Data-Structure-Util In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605232159.k4NLx6FN008524@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Data-Structure-Util https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192574 steve at silug.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From steve at silug.org 2006-05-23 17:51 EST ------- Imported into CVS, branches created, and builds requested. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 23 21:59:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 17:59:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192575] Review Request: perl-Pipeline In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605232159.k4NLxcmn008553@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Pipeline https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192575 Bug 192575 depends on bug 192574, which changed state. Bug 192574 Summary: Review Request: perl-Data-Structure-Util https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192574 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 23 22:13:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 18:13:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192564] Review Request: uuid In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605232213.k4NMDthO009122@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: uuid https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192564 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-05-23 18:06 EST ------- Looks like we need more expertise. As for rpath, my understanding is that we should do what we can to eliminate it but that if it's simply not possible then it won't keep the package out. But after patching the spec as I suggested I see no trace of rpath. That technique has worked for me in the past. About the unstripped libraries, it looks like they aren't executable, so they don't get stripped. I've seen this in the past, and a chmod 755 has fixed it up, but while looking through /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/brp-strip* I saw this: # Strip ELF shared objects # Please note we don't restrict our search to executable files because # our libraries are not (should not be, at least) +x. Sometimes it's just so difficult to figure out how things are really supposed to be done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 23 22:40:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 18:40:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192564] Review Request: uuid In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605232240.k4NMeMTO010759@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: uuid https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192564 ------- Additional Comments From steve at silug.org 2006-05-23 18:32 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > As for rpath, my understanding is that we should do what we can to eliminate it > but that if it's simply not possible then it won't keep the package out. But > after patching the spec as I suggested I see no trace of rpath. That technique > has worked for me in the past. Weird. I just tried it again, and it works this time. I must have changed the wrong make line or something. > About the unstripped libraries, it looks like they aren't executable, so they > don't get stripped. I've seen this in the past, and a chmod 755 has fixed it > up, but while looking through /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/brp-strip* I saw this: > > # Strip ELF shared objects > # Please note we don't restrict our search to executable files because > # our libraries are not (should not be, at least) +x. That's interesting. Just about everything else in my /usr/lib64 is executable. And, sure enough, adding in a chmod gets rid of that rpmlint warning. Try -3, please. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 23 22:56:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 18:56:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188180] Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605232256.k4NMuK6r011683@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188180 ------- Additional Comments From laurent.rineau__fedora_extras at normalesup.org 2006-05-23 18:48 EST ------- (In reply to comment #116) > 2. Should all the subpackages own /usr/lib/qt4? The main package owns it This my fault. rpm has a bug, and if subpackages do not own such common directories, the latter remain when one uninstall the whole package with its subpackages. I did not know it was a rpm bug that is fixed in CVS. I wrote a mail to the FE-list, about this subject. It appears that one can own the directories this way, but it is not a must. Quote of the reply of Ville Skytt? : ------------------------------------------------------------------- The guideline kind of assumes that rpm does proper erasure ordering, but as far as I know, no FC version ships with such rpm. ?Strictly speaking, there are *lots* of packages around that may cause empty dirs being left behind because of that (everything except "filesystem"?), and if the fix for #89500 turns out as expected, the affected ones would be instantly fixed without making any changes to packages and multi-ownership of dirs (for this particular purpose) would become zero-value specfile/rpmdb/repodata cruft. In my opinion that's why the guideline should hold. ?Micro-managing the dirs in a few packages here and there doesn't help much at all in the big picture. -------------------------- end of quote ---------------------------- (In reply to comment #117) > 3. Ownership of /usr/lib/qt4/plugins and /usr/lib/qt4/plugins/sqldrivers also > looks fishy... Again: added after my demand. It could be fixed, or keep this way. > Laurent, do you see anything further on x86_64? No. That's why I stopped spamming this bug after comment #115! ;-) I do not see blockers. As regards this point: (In reply to comment #116) > 1. These might need attention: > > E: qt4-devel script-without-shellbang /usr/lib/qt4/mkspecs/macx-xcode/qmake.conf > E: qt4-devel script-without-shellbang /usr/lib/qt4/mkspecs/macx-xcode/Info.plist.app > E: qt4-devel script-without-shellbang /usr/lib/qt4/mkspecs/macx-pbuilder/qmake.conf > E: qt4-devel script-without-shellbang > /usr/lib/qt4/mkspecs/macx-pbuilder/Info.plist.app > > Might need permissions to be 644? Or do we even need the macx apps packaged? The only needed directories in %{qtdir}/mkspecs are maybe linux-g++*. However, the install: rule of Qt makefiles install "make-specs" for all platforms. Maybe it can be usefull for cross-compiling or something like that. IMO, it should be keeped. I can help a Qt developer to debug a problem that occurs only on other platforms. Maybe. :-\ The permissions could be easily fixed. However, this is not a blocker. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 23 23:04:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 19:04:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192867] Review Request: ctorrent - BitTorrent Client written in C In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605232304.k4NN4TSK011955@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ctorrent - BitTorrent Client written in C https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192867 ------- Additional Comments From yaneti at declera.com 2006-05-23 18:57 EST ------- More notes regarding 1.3.2-1: - the canonical sf source url used in most fedora specs is http://download.sourceforge.net/projectname/.. or http://dl.sf.net/projectname/.. so in this case http://download.sourceforge.net/ctorrent/ctorrent-1.3.2.tar.gz - you don't need the BuildRequires: rpm, see the section BuildRequires/Exceptions in the Packaging guidelines. It includes rpm-build which implies rpm. - you need a BuildRequires: openssl-devel - you don't need the Requires: libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1). All shared library dependencies are automatically generated by rpm. This includes openssl. See the "Requires" section in the Packaging guidelines. - the first line of your description still exceeds 80, please wrap it. - the secton Macros from the Packaging guidelines says "Use macros instead of hard-coded directory names (see Extras/RPMMacros)" which would mean %{_bindir}/ctorrent instead of /usr/bin/ctorrent in the files manifest When changing the spec in result of comments made in the review bump the Release tag and add an appropriate changelog so that there is some tracking of the review process. I can not officially review or sponsor this so thats all from me. Hope it helps. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 23 23:06:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 19:06:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188180] Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605232306.k4NN638C011999@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188180 laurent.rineau__fedora_extras at normalesup.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #129774|0 |1 is obsolete| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 23 23:43:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 19:43:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192867] Review Request: ctorrent - BitTorrent Client written in C In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605232343.k4NNhasF013104@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ctorrent - BitTorrent Client written in C https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192867 ------- Additional Comments From bluekuja at ubuntu.com 2006-05-23 19:36 EST ------- .spec file changed, new link to release 2: http://www.netservers.org/packages/rpm/ctorrent-1.3.2-2.src.rpm Anyway adding %{_bindir}/ctorrent doesn't work as using the correct path, that I've chosen before. By the way thanks for the complete review unfortunately you can't sponsor me, but i think that soon you'll this possibility too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 24 00:01:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 20:01:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192564] Review Request: uuid In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605240001.k4O01d9r013596@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: uuid https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192564 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-05-23 19:54 EST ------- -3 looks good except for this: W: uuid-php devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/php/modules/uuid.a I guess this cropped up with your fix for an rpath issue in the PHP module. I didn't notice it before but maybe rpmlint just didn't pick it up. At this point, with the exception of deleting that errant static library I think we're ready to go. So I'll approve now and you can clean it up when you check in. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 24 00:23:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 20:23:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 183912] Review Request: jack-audio-connection-kit - The Jack Audio Connection Kit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605240023.k4O0NZ9M014159@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jack-audio-connection-kit - The Jack Audio Connection Kit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183912 seg at haxxed.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |seg at haxxed.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 24 00:26:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 20:26:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 183912] Review Request: jack-audio-connection-kit - The Jack Audio Connection Kit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605240026.k4O0QWZq014268@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jack-audio-connection-kit - The Jack Audio Connection Kit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183912 seg at haxxed.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776, 177841 |163779 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 24 00:40:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 20:40:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 178901] Review Request: gtksourceview-sharp In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605240040.k4O0exIB014954@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtksourceview-sharp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=178901 ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2006-05-23 20:33 EST ------- /usr/bin/gapi2-fixup: line 3: which: command not found Build groups changed recently, I believe. It works for me with "config_opts['buildgroup'] = 'build-minimal build-base build'" in the mock config. Well, it does but once I force %_libdir to point to /usr/lib on x86_64. http://fedorared.org/~john/review/gtksourceview-sharp-2.0-7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 24 01:46:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 21:46:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191582] Review Request: xgalaga - Galaga clone for X11 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605240146.k4O1krjo017161@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xgalaga - Galaga clone for X11 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191582 ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2006-05-23 21:39 EST ------- New rpm is STILL missing libXxf86vm-devel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 24 02:01:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 22:01:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192912] New: Review Request: paps Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192912 Summary: Review Request: paps Product: Fedora Core Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: notting at redhat.com ReportedBy: tagoh at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/paps/paps.spec?root=extras&rev=1.10&view=auto SRPM URL: http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/extras/development/SRPMS/paps-0.6.6-1.fc6.src.rpm Description: paps is a PostScript converter from plain text file using Pango. Why I propose moving paps into Core is that to integrate CJK text printing filter and to replace h2ps and bg5ps so far and mpage soon. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 24 02:57:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 22:57:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191605] Review Request: lineak_defaultplugin - default actions for lineakd In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605240257.k4O2v6aS021814@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lineak_defaultplugin - default actions for lineakd https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191605 ------- Additional Comments From lists at forevermore.net 2006-05-23 22:49 EST ------- http://rpm.forevermore.net/lineak/lineak-defaultplugin-0.8.4-4.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 24 02:57:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 22:57:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191606] Review Request: lineak_kdeplugins - KDE-based actions for lineakd In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605240257.k4O2vHH3021835@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lineak_kdeplugins - KDE-based actions for lineakd https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191606 ------- Additional Comments From lists at forevermore.net 2006-05-23 22:49 EST ------- http://rpm.forevermore.net/lineak/lineak-kdeplugins-0.8.4-4.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 24 02:57:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 22:57:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191607] Review Request: lineak_xosdplugin - Onscreen display support for lineakd In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605240257.k4O2vPTD021850@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lineak_xosdplugin - Onscreen display support for lineakd https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191607 ------- Additional Comments From lists at forevermore.net 2006-05-23 22:49 EST ------- http://rpm.forevermore.net/lineak/lineak-xosdplugin-0.8.4-4.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 24 03:44:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 23:44:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188180] Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605240344.k4O3iEiB025865@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188180 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-05-23 23:36 EST ------- I don't see any further blockers... If you want to take a look at the non blocking issues in the last few comments before you import that would be great. Thanks for all your hard work on packaging this up and reviewing... This package is APPROVED. Don't forget to close this bug with NEXTRELEASE once you have imported and built the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 24 03:44:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 23:44:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192889] Review Request: openais standards based cluster framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605240344.k4O3iTut025935@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: openais standards based cluster framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192889 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2006-05-23 23:36 EST ------- (In reply to comment #7) > Addressing comment #2 point #2 on the topic of documentation, we intend in the > community to add about 75-150 man pages in the coming months. Is this suitable > for a separate docs package? Nope. man pages should always be part of the package, which implements what they document. I.e. in general, API docs should be part of *-devel packages, while user application man pages would be part of packages. A separate *-doc packages would be useful for other (non-man, non-info) documentation, e.g. html formated books. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 24 03:48:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 23:48:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191605] Review Request: lineak_defaultplugin - default actions for lineakd In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605240348.k4O3mgd5026604@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lineak_defaultplugin - default actions for lineakd https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191605 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-05-23 23:41 EST ------- Now %configure succeeds, but the build fails due to a missing BR: libxkbfile-devel. Adding that gets me through the build. For the purposes of this review, I'll assume that it's there since there's no point in another round; you can fix it when you check in. Review: * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * dist tag is present. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. License text included in package. * source files match upstream: 336b4fa5aa40b1166c2aa5418740357b lineak_defaultplugin-0.8.4.tar.gz 336b4fa5aa40b1166c2aa5418740357b lineak_defaultplugin-0.8.4.tar.gz-srpm * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper (after adding libxkbfile-devel). * package builds in mock (development, x86_64) (after adding libxkbfile-devel). * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: config(lineak-defaultplugin) = 0.8.4-4.fc6 defaultplugin.so()(64bit) lineak_defaultplugin = 0.8.4 mediadetectplugin.so()(64bit) lineak-defaultplugin = 0.8.4-4.fc6 - config(lineak-defaultplugin) = 0.8.4-4.fc6 libX11.so.6()(64bit) libXext.so.6()(64bit) libXtst.so.6()(64bit) libdl.so.2()(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1()(64bit) liblineak.so.0()(64bit) libm.so.6()(64bit) libstdc++.so.6()(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3)(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(GLIBCXX_3.4)(64bit) lineakd = 0.8.4 * shared libraries are present, but internal to lineakd so ldconfig isn't called. * package is not relocatable. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * %clean is present. * %check is not present; no test suite upstream. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no libtool .la droppings. * not a GUI app. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 24 04:19:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 May 2006 00:19:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192546] Review Request: gnubiff In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605240419.k4O4JVAH029205@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnubiff https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192546 splinux at fedoraproject.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From splinux at fedoraproject.org 2006-05-24 00:11 EST ------- - Remove --prefix='pkg-config libpanelapplet-2.0 openssl --variable=prefix OK - Remove ABOUT-NLS & Changelog in %file section OK - Fixing %{_datadir}/info to {_infodir} OK Package imported in Extras -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 24 05:09:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 May 2006 01:09:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191582] Review Request: xgalaga - Galaga clone for X11 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605240509.k4O59iNw001335@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xgalaga - Galaga clone for X11 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191582 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-05-24 01:02 EST ------- Oops you're right, I did put adding it in the changelog, but I didn't actually do this. Fixed SRPM and spec are at: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 24 05:41:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 May 2006 01:41:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191605] Review Request: lineak_defaultplugin - default actions for lineakd In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605240541.k4O5fot5002534@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lineak_defaultplugin - default actions for lineakd https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191605 lists at forevermore.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 24 05:43:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 May 2006 01:43:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192884] Review Request: poedit - GUI editor for GNU gettext .po files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605240543.k4O5h3iF002635@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: poedit - GUI editor for GNU gettext .po files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192884 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2006-05-24 01:35 EST ------- NEEDSWORK: Checking for unpackaged file(s): /usr/lib/rpm/check-files /var/tmp/poedit-1.3.4-1-root-packman error: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found: /usr/share/gnome/apps/Development/poedit.desktop /usr/share/mime-info/poedit.keys /usr/share/mime-info/poedit.mime /usr/share/pixmaps/poedit.png /usr/share/pixmaps/poedit.xpm RPM build errors: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found: /usr/share/gnome/apps/Development/poedit.desktop /usr/share/mime-info/poedit.keys /usr/share/mime-info/poedit.mime /usr/share/pixmaps/poedit.png /usr/share/pixmaps/poedit.xpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 24 06:14:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 May 2006 02:14:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 173459] Review Request: initng In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605240614.k4O6EW7W003651@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 daner964 at student.liu.se changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #129307|0 |1 is obsolete| | ------- Additional Comments From daner964 at student.liu.se 2006-05-24 02:06 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=129900) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=129900&action=view) initng-ifiles 0.0.5-1 spec file (In reply to comment #297) > 0.0.5 ifiles have been release since a while now... > > http://download.initng.org/initng-ifiles/v0.0/ I know that. I should've uploaded it directly if just bugzilla had been working. Here goes. Nothing changed but the version number... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 24 06:54:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 May 2006 02:54:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192867] Review Request: ctorrent - BitTorrent Client written in C In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605240654.k4O6s16g005470@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ctorrent - BitTorrent Client written in C https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192867 ------- Additional Comments From yaneti at declera.com 2006-05-24 02:46 EST ------- - Requires: gcc should be removed. If there is a runtime dependancy on any gcc lib its automatically genereated. - %{_bindir}/ctorrent should work. If it doesn't you either made a typo or your build enviroment is not quite standard fedora fare. custom macros and such...? - your changelog is not formatted properly. The first line should end with - E-V-R of the package. There should be an empty newline after each new changelog section. "Changes to .spec file" is not an actual description of what changed therefore useles to reveiwers and users. Provide a little bit more details on what actually changed. Something like: - fixed URL - removed unneeded Reqiures, added openssl-devel to BR. - please remove all the trailing spaces, they might confuse rpm and other spec handling tools. The spaces in the template are there not to trail but to align the position of the values of the tags. rpmlint as mandated by the guidelines should have spotted most of these -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 24 07:15:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 May 2006 03:15:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191594] Review Request: gtkglextmm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605240715.k4O7FTJP006221@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtkglextmm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191594 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2006-05-24 03:08 EST ------- Gilles, 1. In CVS, you are using the same Release:-tag for devel and FC-5. In future, please make sure these are different and that the Release tag of devel is greater than that of FC-5, otherwise upgrades from one FC-release to another one are likely to fail. I recommend using %{?dist}. As this is your first package, I've applied corresponding changes to devel and FC-5, and triggered a rebuild for devel. (ATM, there is no need to rebuild FC-5) 2. You should have closed this PR, when the packages had been released. 3. Please remove FE-NEEDSPONSOR from this PR and all others you might have added it to. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 24 07:17:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 May 2006 03:17:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192918] New: Review Request: kerry - Kerry Beagle is a KDE frontend for the Beagle desktop search Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192918 Summary: Review Request: kerry - Kerry Beagle is a KDE frontend for the Beagle desktop search Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: hugo at devin.com.br QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.devin.com.br/eitch/rpm/fedora/SPECS/kerry.spec SRPM URL: http://www.devin.com.br/eitch/rpm/fedora/5/SRPMS/kerry-0.1.1-1.src.rpm Description: Kerry Beagle is a nice KDE frontend for the Beagle desktop search daemon, it uses indexed searched files from beagle and displays in a KDE way, integrating totally with the desktop, systray, and Konqueror. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 24 07:31:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 May 2006 03:31:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 173459] Review Request: initng In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605240731.k4O7VDqW007825@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 daner964 at student.liu.se changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #129723|0 |1 is obsolete| | ------- Additional Comments From daner964 at student.liu.se 2006-05-24 03:23 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=129901) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=129901&action=view) initng 0.6.7-3 spec file Fixing what was pointed out in #294 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 24 07:31:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 May 2006 03:31:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 185951] Review Request: amsn : msn messenger clone In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605240731.k4O7VCDm007819@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: amsn : msn messenger clone https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=185951 ------- Additional Comments From tjikkun at xs4all.nl 2006-05-24 03:23 EST ------- I will try to find this out. If they were not send upstream I will contact them to see if they accept the changes. If they accept I will also let you know. In the meantime, is it ok to have Amsn_BWidget included? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 24 07:33:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 May 2006 03:33:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192918] Review Request: kerry - Kerry Beagle is a KDE frontend for the Beagle desktop search In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605240733.k4O7XjHR008178@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kerry - Kerry Beagle is a KDE frontend for the Beagle desktop search https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192918 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-05-24 03:26 EST ------- Hugo, Great to see that you're packaging even more software. As promised I'll try to review a few of your packages for you when time permits. But unfortunatly currently time doesn't permit. What I want / am trying to say is keep up the good work and don't get discouraged by the lack of reviews actually moving forward. Everbody in FE is doing it in their sparetime and doing reviews usually is low on most people's priority list, because packaging things yourself for example is more fun. With regards to that. In order for the system to not collapse you should try todo a review for every package thats get reviewed for you. You could even try to exchange reviews. So if you want to get things moving a bit more mail to f-e-l saying that you want to exchange reviews, include full URL's to all your review requests and hopefully someone will reply with a review request of his own, then you review his package and he reviews yours and there are 2 less reviews todo (repeat untill all your packages are reviewed). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 24 07:50:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 May 2006 03:50:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192918] Review Request: kerry - Kerry Beagle is a KDE frontend for the Beagle desktop search In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605240750.k4O7oVLw010437@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kerry - Kerry Beagle is a KDE frontend for the Beagle desktop search https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192918 ------- Additional Comments From hugo at devin.com.br 2006-05-24 03:43 EST ------- I understand the lack of time and I'm really patient with these, as I know for sure that this is a voluntary work and it depends on other's spare time. I'll not get discouraged, as I know how this works, thanks! Regarding the reviews, I'm always reading other works and reviews to learn more about the packaging process (as I'm kinda new here). I don't know if I'm actually competent in running reviews for other packages since I'm not experienced... But I'll try and give it a go. Thanks for your support! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 24 08:25:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 May 2006 04:25:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192918] Review Request: kerry - Kerry Beagle is a KDE frontend for the Beagle desktop search In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605240825.k4O8PKTb013892@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kerry - Kerry Beagle is a KDE frontend for the Beagle desktop search https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192918 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-05-24 04:17 EST ------- Don't worry about not being competent for doing a review if you make a mistake the person being reviewed will most likely correct you. Also as your sponsor I'm watching all your bugzilla activity for now, once you're settled I'll stop doing that. Sorry if that is a bit Big Brother but its the easiest way to keep an eye on you and its actually possible with BZ to watch anyone you don't need to be a sponsor for that :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 24 11:48:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 May 2006 07:48:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 173459] Review Request: initng In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605241148.k4OBmqou025770@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 ------- Additional Comments From dragoran at feuerpokemon.de 2006-05-24 07:41 EST ------- -DCMAKE_CXX_FLAGS:STRING='%{optflags}' is stupid becuase initng is written in C you should use (or at least add) -DCMAKE_C_FLAGS:STRING='%{optflags}' here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 24 11:50:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 May 2006 07:50:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192867] Review Request: ctorrent - BitTorrent Client written in C In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605241150.k4OBo9vM025905@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ctorrent - BitTorrent Client written in C https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192867 ------- Additional Comments From bluekuja at ubuntu.com 2006-05-24 07:42 EST ------- Spec URL: http://www.netservers.org/packages/rpm/ctorrent.spec SRPM URL: http://www.netservers.org/packages/rpm/ctorrent-1.3.2-3.src.rpm Release 3, problems fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 24 12:11:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 May 2006 08:11:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192889] Review Request: openais standards based cluster framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605241211.k4OCBaeu026650@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: openais standards based cluster framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192889 paul at city-fan.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |paul at city-fan.org ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-05-24 08:03 EST ------- (In reply to comment #0) > I have followed the packaging guidelines as closely as possible. I have also run rpmlint (with some strange complaints about the init script). I took a look at this package with a view to fixing the rpmlint/initscript issues. However, I found a lot more to do here as well. (In reply to comment #9) > Addressing comment #3: > Do you mean by this comment that I should not list out each individual shared > object file, but instead use wildcards? It appears from the many examples I > found that each file is listed separately but I could remove all of the separate > filenames and then use the wildcard lines. I have no preference either way, > although it is somewhat helpful for the package maintainer (me) if the specfile > were to complain during build because of a shared object additiion/removal. I agree with you here, and tend to explicitly list binaries and important shared libs explictly. It's a personal preference thing. However, I'd be inclined to just have: %{_includedir}/openais/ rather than enumerating each and every include file, and you might consider something similar for the manpages if there eventually going to be hundreds of them. (In reply to comment #10) > Nope. man pages should always be part of the package, which implements what they > document. I.e. in general, API docs should be part of *-devel packages, while > user application man pages would be part of packages. > > A separate *-doc packages would be useful for other (non-man, non-info) > documentation, e.g. html formated books. I agree enirely with this. Now, on to my suggested changes to the spec. Much of what rpmlint was complaining about was due to the initscript, which wasn't installed using chkconfig in %post despite the PreReq: of chkconfig being in the spec, and the initscript itself was "enabled by default", which is generally a no-no. Suggestions: * Add %post and %preun calls to chkconfig to install and remove the initscript links properly * Use Requires(post) and Requires(presun) style scriptlet deps instead of PreReq: * Patch the initscript to not be enabled by default Now for the other things I came across: * The URL points to a tarball and not the project home page * Source0 is not a full URL (the value of the current Url: would work) * "%define _exec_prefix /usr" should be avoided * Directory ownership is still not right, e.g. for include files * I'd suggest ending manpage %files entries with "*" rather than ".gz" so as to enable the package to build on systems where manpages aren't compressed, or are compressed with something else, like bzip * Please bump the release for every package change during the review process so that it's easier to tell which comments apply to which version of the package I'll attach an updated spec and patches. And finally for now... * The package does not honor %{optflags}. Worse still, when CFLAGS is set to "%{optflags}" to correct this, the package fails to build, with some worrying-looking errors: ... ==== /nis-home/phowarth/BUILD/BUILD/openais-0.75/exec === make[1]: Entering directory `/nis-home/phowarth/BUILD/BUILD/openais-0.75/exec' cc -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m32 -march=i386 -mtune=generic -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -fPIC -c -o aispoll.o aispoll.c cc -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m32 -march=i386 -mtune=generic -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -fPIC -c -o totemip.o totemip.c cc -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m32 -march=i386 -mtune=generic -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -fPIC -c -o totemnet.o totemnet.c cc -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m32 -march=i386 -mtune=generic -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -fPIC -c -o totemrrp.o totemrrp.c totemrrp.c: In function 'active_instance_initialize': totemrrp.c:873: warning: call to __builtin___memset_chk will always overflow destination buffer cc -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m32 -march=i386 -mtune=generic -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -fPIC -c -o totemsrp.o totemsrp.c totemsrp.c:1151: warning: 'memb_set_print' defined but not used cc -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m32 -march=i386 -mtune=generic -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -fPIC -c -o totemmrp.o totemmrp.c cc -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m32 -march=i386 -mtune=generic -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -fPIC -c -o totempg.o totempg.c cc -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m32 -march=i386 -mtune=generic -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -fPIC -c -o tlist.o tlist.c cc -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m32 -march=i386 -mtune=generic -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -fPIC -c -o crypto.o crypto.c cc -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m32 -march=i386 -mtune=generic -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -fPIC -c -o wthread.o wthread.c ar -rc libtotem_pg.a aispoll.o totemip.o totemnet.o totemrrp.o totemsrp.o totemmrp.o totempg.o tlist.o crypto.o wthread.o cc -ldl -lpthread -L./ -rdynamic -ldl -shared -Wl,-soname,libtotem_pg.so.1 aispoll.o totemip.o totemnet.o totemrrp.o totemsrp.o totemmrp.o totempg.o tlist.o crypto.o wthread.o -o libtotem_pg.so.1.0 cc -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m32 -march=i386 -mtune=generic -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -c -o main.o main.c cc -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m32 -march=i386 -mtune=generic -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -c -o print.o print.c cc -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m32 -march=i386 -mtune=generic -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -c -o mempool.o mempool.c cc -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m32 -march=i386 -mtune=generic -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -c -o util.o util.c util.c: In function 'getSaNameT': util.c:99: warning: pointer targets in return differ in signedness cc -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m32 -march=i386 -mtune=generic -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -c -o sync.o sync.c cc -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m32 -march=i386 -mtune=generic -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -c -o service.o service.c cc -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m32 -march=i386 -mtune=generic -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -c -o ipc.o ipc.c ipc.c: In function 'libais_deliver': ipc.c:532: warning: implicit declaration of function 'getpeereid' ipc.c: At top level: ipc.c:675: warning: 'deliver_fn' defined but not used cc -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m32 -march=i386 -mtune=generic -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -fPIC -c -o totemconfig.o totemconfig.c cc -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m32 -march=i386 -mtune=generic -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -c -o mainconfig.o mainconfig.c cc -ldl -lpthread -L./ -rdynamic -ldl aispoll.o totemip.o totemnet.o totemrrp.o totemsrp.o totemmrp.o totempg.o tlist.o crypto.o wthread.o main.o print.o mempool.o util.o sync.o service.o ipc.o totemconfig.o mainconfig.o ../lcr/lcr_ifact.o libtotem_pg.a -o aisexec totemnet.o: In function `netif_determine': /nis-home/phowarth/BUILD/BUILD/openais-0.75/exec/totemnet.c:696: undefined reference to `totemip_iface_check' ipc.o: In function `libais_deliver': /nis-home/phowarth/BUILD/BUILD/openais-0.75/exec/ipc.c:532: undefined reference to `getpeereid' collect2: ld returned 1 exit status make[1]: *** [aisexec] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/nis-home/phowarth/BUILD/BUILD/openais-0.75/exec' make: *** [all] Error 2 error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.861 (%build) RPM build errors: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.861 (%build) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 24 12:13:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 May 2006 08:13:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 173459] Review Request: initng In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605241213.k4OCDNul026736@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 daner964 at student.liu.se changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #129901|0 |1 is obsolete| | ------- Additional Comments From daner964 at student.liu.se 2006-05-24 08:05 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=129911) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=129911&action=view) initng 0.6.7-4 spec file (In reply to comment #300) > -DCMAKE_CXX_FLAGS:STRING='%{optflags}' > is stupid becuase initng is written in C you should use (or at least add) > -DCMAKE_C_FLAGS:STRING='%{optflags}' here. You're quite right. Noticed that I'd missed Rudolfs #293, now fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 24 12:16:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 May 2006 08:16:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192889] Review Request: openais standards based cluster framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605241216.k4OCGv2D026941@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: openais standards based cluster framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192889 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-05-24 08:09 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=129912) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=129912&action=view) New spec file promised in Comment #11 rpmlint output from building with this spec: E: openais non-readable /usr/sbin/ais-keygen 0700 E: openais non-standard-executable-perm /usr/sbin/ais-keygen 0700 W: openais incoherent-subsys /etc/rc.d/init.d/openais $prog The first two are unavoidable due to the permissions having to be restrictive. The last is I believe unavoidable if the initscript name doesn't match the executable name (as is the case here) and you want to be able to use the standard "status" function. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 24 12:20:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 May 2006 08:20:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192889] Review Request: openais standards based cluster framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605241220.k4OCKELp027150@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: openais standards based cluster framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192889 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-05-24 08:12 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=129913) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=129913&action=view) Patch for initscript to not enable the service by default -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 24 12:20:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 May 2006 08:20:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188180] Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605241220.k4OCKhS8027194@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188180 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-05-24 08:13 EST ------- Thanks everyone for the excellent review(s)! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 24 12:21:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 May 2006 08:21:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192889] Review Request: openais standards based cluster framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605241221.k4OCLOAk027266@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: openais standards based cluster framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192889 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-05-24 08:13 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=129914) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=129914&action=view) Patch to Makefile to use DESTDIR more sensibly -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 24 12:38:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 May 2006 08:38:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 173459] Review Request: initng In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605241238.k4OCcttT028465@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 ------- Additional Comments From che666 at gmail.com 2006-05-24 08:31 EST ------- #300 was more or less a copy and paste typo i missed in my first comment like #301 says i corrected myself already in #293 atleast with that added at all 64 bit builds are actually real 64 bit builds :) initng 0.6.7 with 0.0.5 ifiles work quite fine here. can you confirm on 32bit that the loop module never gets probed? i have to look up where in the sysvinit stuff that is done. cant atm though... sorry. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 24 13:00:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 May 2006 09:00:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192884] Review Request: poedit - GUI editor for GNU gettext .po files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605241300.k4OD0lvB029873@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: poedit - GUI editor for GNU gettext .po files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192884 ------- Additional Comments From icon at fedoraproject.org 2006-05-24 08:53 EST ------- Please build in mock. The build results will always be different depending on your current installation environment -- thus, the spec file has been written to specifically address building in mock. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 24 13:16:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 May 2006 09:16:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192884] Review Request: poedit - GUI editor for GNU gettext .po files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605241316.k4ODGGZa030520@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: poedit - GUI editor for GNU gettext .po files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192884 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-05-24 09:08 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > Please build in mock. The build results will always be different depending on your current installation > environment -- thus, the spec file has been written to specifically address building in mock. That sounds like a bug to me. Builds should work in any environment with the appropriate BuildRequires in place. If the files listed in Comment #1 are not installed when building in mock, that suggests that you have missed a build requirement in your spec. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 24 13:51:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 May 2006 09:51:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189656] Review Request: lilypond - A typesetting system for music notation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605241351.k4ODpLxS000370@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lilypond - A typesetting system for music notation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189656 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-05-24 09:43 EST ------- This seems to be built and out to the mirrors for devel and FC5; any reason this ticket is still open? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 24 13:52:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 May 2006 09:52:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192575] Review Request: perl-Pipeline In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605241352.k4ODqi5U000544@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Pipeline https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192575 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |tibbs at math.uh.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 24 13:55:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 May 2006 09:55:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 173459] Review Request: initng In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605241355.k4ODtoM8000767@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 ------- Additional Comments From daner964 at student.liu.se 2006-05-24 09:48 EST ------- Just like to note that with -DCMAKE_C_FLAGS:STRING='%{optflags}' 0.6.7 doesn't build at all for me, I get the following: cc1: warnings being treated as errors /home/danielm/rpmbuild/BUILD/initng-0.6.7/src/initng_main.c: In function 'initng_main_segfault': /home/danielm/rpmbuild/BUILD/initng-0.6.7/src/initng_main.c:547: warning: ignoring return value of 'write', declared with attribute warn_unused_result /home/danielm/rpmbuild/BUILD/initng-0.6.7/src/initng_main.c:559: warning: ignoring return value of 'write', declared with attribute warn_unused_result ...whereas I don't get any warnings at all without the extra flags. I fixed the warnings in svn by just checking the return value of write() and then doing nothing with it, which might not be the prettiest - but working - solution. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 24 14:03:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 May 2006 10:03:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192884] Review Request: poedit - GUI editor for GNU gettext .po files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605241403.k4OE3glx001323@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: poedit - GUI editor for GNU gettext .po files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192884 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2006-05-24 09:56 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > That sounds like a bug to me. Builds should work in any environment with the > appropriate BuildRequires in place. Agreed. A package must build deterministically, no matter which environment is being used. Consider this package BLOCKED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 24 14:06:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 May 2006 10:06:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189656] Review Request: lilypond - A typesetting system for music notation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605241406.k4OE6daC001497@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lilypond - A typesetting system for music notation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189656 qspencer at ieee.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From qspencer at ieee.org 2006-05-24 09:59 EST ------- No, just forgot to close it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 24 14:07:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 May 2006 10:07:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192502] Review Request: lilypond-doc - HTML documentation for lilypond In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605241407.k4OE7kQU001667@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lilypond-doc - HTML documentation for lilypond https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192502 qspencer at ieee.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 24 14:20:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 May 2006 10:20:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192564] Review Request: uuid In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605241420.k4OEKK6A002591@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: uuid https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192564 ------- Additional Comments From steve at silug.org 2006-05-24 10:12 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > -3 looks good except for this: > > W: uuid-php devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/php/modules/uuid.a > > I guess this cropped up with your fix for an rpath issue in the PHP module. I > didn't notice it before but maybe rpmlint just didn't pick it up. Oops. I didn't notice that. (And yes, it is new in -3.) Sorry. I'm importing -4 into CVS now with that fixed. $ rpmlint uuid-*1.4.2-4.x86_64.rpm W: uuid-c++ no-documentation W: uuid-dce no-documentation W: uuid-dce-devel no-documentation W: uuid-pgsql no-documentation W: uuid-php no-documentation -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 24 14:27:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 May 2006 10:27:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 173459] Review Request: initng In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605241427.k4OERE0R003059@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 ------- Additional Comments From dragoran at feuerpokemon.de 2006-05-24 10:19 EST ------- for me svn does not build: Linking C shared library libinitng.so /usr/bin/cmake -E remove -f libinitng.a libinitng.so.0.0.0 libinitng.so.0 libinitng.so cd /home/dragoran/rpm/BUILD/initng-0.6.7/src && gcc -fPIC -shared -Wl,-soname,libinitng.so.0 -o libinitng.so.0.0.0 "CMakeFiles/initng.dir/initng_active_db.o" "CMakeFiles/initng.dir/initng_active_state.o" "CMakeFiles/initng.dir/initng_common.o" "CMakeFiles/initng.dir/initng_control_command.o" "CMakeFiles/initng.dir/initng_depend.o" "CMakeFiles/initng.dir/initng_error.o" "CMakeFiles/initng.dir/initng_execute.o" "CMakeFiles/initng.dir/initng_env_variable.o" "CMakeFiles/initng.dir/initng_fd.o" "CMakeFiles/initng.dir/initng_fork.o" "CMakeFiles/initng.dir/initng_handler.o" "CMakeFiles/initng.dir/initng_interrupt.o" "CMakeFiles/initng.dir/initng_kill_handler.o" "CMakeFiles/initng.dir/initng_load_module.o" "CMakeFiles/initng.dir/initng_main.o" "CMakeFiles/initng.dir/initng_open_read_close.o" "CMakeFiles/initng.dir/initng_plugin_callers.o" "CMakeFiles/initng.dir/initng_plugin_hook.o" "CMakeFiles/initng.dir/initng_process_db.o" "CMakeFiles/initng.dir/initng_service_cache.o" "CMakeFiles/initng.dir/initng_service_data_types.o" "CMakeFiles/initng.dir/initng_service_types.o" "CMakeFiles/initng.dir/initng_signal.o" "CMakeFiles/initng.dir/initng_static_data_id.o" "CMakeFiles/initng.dir/initng_static_states.o" "CMakeFiles/initng.dir/initng_static_service_types.o" "CMakeFiles/initng.dir/initng_string_tools.o" "CMakeFiles/initng.dir/initng_struct_data.o" "CMakeFiles/initng.dir/initng_toolbox.o" -ldl -lselinux cd /home/dragoran/rpm/BUILD/initng-0.6.7/src && /usr/bin/cmake -E cmake_symlink_library libinitng.so.0.0.0 libinitng.so.0 libinitng.so make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/dragoran/rpm/BUILD/initng-0.6.7' make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/dragoran/rpm/BUILD/initng-0.6.7' make: *** [all] Error 2 error: Bad exit status from /home/dragoran/rpm/tmp/rpm-tmp.80463 (%build) RPM build errors: Bad exit status from /home/dragoran/rpm/tmp/rpm-tmp.80463 (%build) no errormessage at all.. whats going on? the only thing that I changed is the selinux file (src/plugins/initng_selinux.c) will attach it after posting this (not tested at all so not in svn) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 24 14:30:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 May 2006 10:30:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 173459] Review Request: initng In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605241430.k4OEU2x0003373@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 ------- Additional Comments From dragoran at feuerpokemon.de 2006-05-24 10:22 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=129936) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=129936&action=view) plugins/selinux/initng_selinux.c here is the new initng_selinux file please test and report if it builds at all and if yes if it works better (less avcs) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 24 14:32:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 May 2006 10:32:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 173459] Review Request: initng In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605241432.k4OEW2KX003545@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 dragoran at feuerpokemon.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #129936|0 |1 is obsolete| | ------- Additional Comments From dragoran at feuerpokemon.de 2006-05-24 10:24 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=129937) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=129937&action=view) sorry wrong file attached again -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 24 14:44:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 May 2006 10:44:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189009] Review Request: bzrtools - A collection of utilities and plugins for Bazaar-NG In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605241444.k4OEibEU004823@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bzrtools - A collection of utilities and plugins for Bazaar-NG https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189009 shahms at shahms.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 24 14:47:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 May 2006 10:47:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188180] Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605241447.k4OElTJD005251@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188180 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-05-24 10:40 EST ------- Imported. FC-4, FC-5 branches requested. Queued fc6/devel build after the following update: %changelog * Wed May 24 2006 Rex Dieter 4.1.3-4 - move (most) %%dir ownership (back) to main pkg -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 24 14:47:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 May 2006 10:47:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191208] Review Request: The Ipe extensible drawing editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605241447.k4OEliIo005320@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: The Ipe extensible drawing editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191208 Bug 191208 depends on bug 188180, which changed state. Bug 188180 Summary: Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188180 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 24 14:48:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 May 2006 10:48:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190189] Review Request: PyQt4: Python bindings for Qt4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605241448.k4OEm62J005380@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PyQt4: Python bindings for Qt4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190189 Bug 190189 depends on bug 188180, which changed state. Bug 188180 Summary: Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188180 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 24 14:50:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 May 2006 10:50:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189013] Review Request: python-sqlalchemy - Modular and flexible ORM library for python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605241450.k4OEoN7h005674@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-sqlalchemy - Modular and flexible ORM library for python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189013 shahms at shahms.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 24 14:50:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 May 2006 10:50:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 173459] Review Request: initng In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605241450.k4OEoej1005750@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 ------- Additional Comments From dragoran at feuerpokemon.de 2006-05-24 10:42 EST ------- found the error: cc1: warnings being treated as errors /home/dragoran/rpm/BUILD/initng-0.6.7/plugins/bash_parser/initng_bash_parser.c: In function 'bp_handle_client': /home/dragoran/rpm/BUILD/initng-0.6.7/plugins/bash_parser/initng_bash_parser.c:108: warning: value computed is not used /home/dragoran/rpm/BUILD/initng-0.6.7/plugins/bash_parser/initng_bash_parser.c:118: warning: value computed is not used /home/dragoran/rpm/BUILD/initng-0.6.7/plugins/bash_parser/initng_bash_parser.c:149: warning: value computed is not used make[2]: *** [plugins/bash_parser/CMakeFiles/bash_parser.dir/initng_bash_parser.o] Error 1 make[1]: *** [plugins/bash_parser/CMakeFiles/bash_parser.dir/all] Error 2 make[1]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... for some reason it does not like SEND() #define SEND() (send(fd, &rep, sizeof(bp_rep), 0) == (signed) sizeof(bp_rep)) whitout a if this does not make any sense... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 24 14:51:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 May 2006 10:51:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192884] Review Request: poedit - GUI editor for GNU gettext .po files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605241451.k4OEp4Go005795@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: poedit - GUI editor for GNU gettext .po files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192884 ------- Additional Comments From icon at fedoraproject.org 2006-05-24 10:43 EST ------- I have not missed any buildrequires. Gnome and KDE are NOT required to build this package -- the configure script will simply install .desktop and icon files in a few extra (unnecessary) locations if it finds them (and I delete them anyway, since they are bogus). Okay, what I will do is make sure I rm -rf all potential directories where the makefile sticks its stuff. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 24 14:57:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 May 2006 10:57:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192958] New: Review Request: ejabberd - A distributed, fault-tolerant Jabber/XMPP server Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192958 Summary: Review Request: ejabberd - A distributed, fault-tolerant Jabber/XMPP server Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: jeff at ollie.clive.ia.us QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.ocjtech.us/ejabberd-1.1.1-1.spec SRPM URL: http://www.ocjtech.us/ejabberd-1.1.1-1.src.rpm Description: ejabberd is a Free and Open Source distributed fault-tolerant Jabber/XMPP server. It is mostly written in Erlang, and runs on many platforms (tested on Linux, FreeBSD, NetBSD, Solaris, Mac OS X and Windows NT/2000/XP). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 24 15:20:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 May 2006 11:20:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192884] Review Request: poedit - GUI editor for GNU gettext .po files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605241520.k4OFKH0K007690@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: poedit - GUI editor for GNU gettext .po files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192884 ------- Additional Comments From icon at fedoraproject.org 2006-05-24 11:12 EST ------- http://blues.mcgill.ca/~icon/fe/poedit-1.3.4-2.src.rpm http://blues.mcgill.ca/~icon/fe/poedit.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 24 15:26:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 May 2006 11:26:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192884] Review Request: poedit - GUI editor for GNU gettext .po files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605241526.k4OFQYK8008208@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: poedit - GUI editor for GNU gettext .po files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192884 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-05-24 11:18 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > I have not missed any buildrequires. Gnome and KDE are NOT required to build > this package -- the configure script will simply install .desktop and icon files > in a few extra (unnecessary) locations if it finds them (and I delete them > anyway, since they are bogus). > > Okay, what I will do is make sure I rm -rf all potential directories where the > makefile sticks its stuff. That's fine, as long as the build works consistently in environments where those extra files would get installed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 24 15:51:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 May 2006 11:51:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 183912] Review Request: jack-audio-connection-kit - The Jack Audio Connection Kit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605241551.k4OFpB2j010720@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jack-audio-connection-kit - The Jack Audio Connection Kit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183912 ------- Additional Comments From andy at smile.org.ua 2006-05-24 11:43 EST ------- Jason, I am newbie at all. I'm starting the membership process. When I finished yet I'll tell here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 24 15:55:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 May 2006 11:55:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191523] Review Request: perl-XML-Stream In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605241555.k4OFtfFk011201@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-XML-Stream https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191523 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-05-24 11:48 EST ------- Updated to indicate the module is triple licensed: Perl (Artistic / GPL) & LGPL Spec URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-XML-Stream.spec SRPM URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-XML-Stream-1.22-3.fc5.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 24 15:57:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 May 2006 11:57:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191540] Review Request: perl-Net-XMPP In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605241557.k4OFvKgP011333@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-XMPP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191540 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-05-24 11:49 EST ------- Updated to indicate the module is triple licensed: Perl (Artistic / GPL) & LGPL (See BZ#191523) Updated: Spec URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-Net-XMPP.spec SRPM URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-Net-XMPP-1.0-3.fc5.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 24 15:57:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 May 2006 11:57:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191545] Review Request: perl-Net-Jabber In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605241557.k4OFvv7G011392@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-Jabber https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191545 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-05-24 11:50 EST ------- Updated to indicate the module is triple licensed: Perl (Artistic / GPL) & LGPL (See BZ#191523) Spec URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-Net-Jabber.spec SRPM URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-Net-Jabber-2.0-3.fc5.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 24 16:14:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 May 2006 12:14:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188574] Review Request: rss-glx -- Really Slick Screensavers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605241614.k4OGELAd012607@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rss-glx -- Really Slick Screensavers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188574 ------- Additional Comments From nphilipp at redhat.com 2006-05-24 12:06 EST ------- (In reply to comment #8) > Things are looking good now. One new rpmlint warning (a line in %description is > too long). Fixed. > However, I went to test this on a couple of i386 FC5 machines under KDE (so > rss-glx and rss-glx-kde are installed); the hacks display when run directly > (they open a small window in the background) but as KDE screensavers there are > some issues: > > They show up at the bottom of the list, not filed under "OpenGL Screen Savers". > Maybe they should have their own place in the hierarchy? ("Really Slick Screen > Savers"?) I think you do this by using X-KDE-Category= in the desktop file. > It's probably also worth using X-KDE-Type=OpenGL as well. But it looks like > you're just using the desktop files supplied by upstream here; I'm not sure if > it's worth it to hack them up. > > The desktop files include "Actions=InWindow;Root" but then go on to define a > Setup action as well. Let others decide whether it was worth it, it was just one line of awk per desktop file ;-). > The setup page for each screensaver doesn't work at all unless you also install > rss-glx-screensaver. Should this be a dependency of rss-glx-kde, or is > something else wrong? Seems KDE (specifixally its kxs* tools) depends on the XSS files being in place for all XSS-like hacks. I've added a dependency. > The screensavers don't actually do anything; the "Test" button causes the > desktop to pause (system monitor and clock stop updating), but nothing is > actually displayed. This happens on my home machine with binary Nvidia driver > and a machine here at work with a Radeon R200 (stock X driver). Any ideas? Not ATM. I'll try it at a colleague's desktop (he uses KDE) to see whether the above fixes change anything in that regard. I've put the new package at (note the added ".p" in the version to indicate that we're working with modified sources): http://tiptoe.de/dav/rss-glx-0.8.1.p-0.5.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 24 16:29:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 May 2006 12:29:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188574] Review Request: rss-glx -- Really Slick Screensavers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605241629.k4OGTooN013680@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rss-glx -- Really Slick Screensavers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188574 ------- Additional Comments From nphilipp at redhat.com 2006-05-24 12:22 EST ------- Hmm, it didn't work on his KDE desktop either. Should I disable the -kde subpackage then until upstream fixes it or someone provides a patch as I don't really have a clue about the KDE screensaver system? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 24 17:53:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 May 2006 13:53:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 181599] Review Request: gallery: web based photo album software In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605241753.k4OHrhxg019509@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gallery: web based photo album software https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=181599 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |kevin at tummy.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-05-24 13:46 EST ------- Sorry this has been sitting in NEW for so long... Can you update to 2.1.1 (latest stable) and I will be happy to do a full review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 24 17:59:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 May 2006 13:59:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 169703] Review Request: pari - Number Theory-oriented Computer Algebra System In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605241759.k4OHxlFr019812@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pari - Number Theory-oriented Computer Algebra System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=169703 ------- Additional Comments From orion at cora.nwra.com 2006-05-24 13:52 EST ------- (In reply to comment #22) > What is difference to the situation before we used --host=none? > It then already built fine, the problem was were the non-pic libraries, > and, as you say, this is still the case. (See also comment #5) The patch fixes the following error /usr/bin/gcc -o gp-dyn -O3 -DGCC_INLINE -Wall -Wno-implicit -fomit-frame-pointer -fPIC -Xlinker -export-dynamic gp.o gp_init.o gp_rl.o highlvl.o whatnow.o plot.o plotport.o -L/export/home/orion/redhat/pari-2.1.7/pari-2.1.7/Olinux-i686 -L/usr/lib -lreadline -lncurses -L/usr/lib -lpari -L/usr/lib -lX11 -ldl -lm /usr/bin/ld: gp-dyn: hidden symbol `__stack_chk_fail_local' in /usr/lib/libc_nonshared.a(stack_chk_fail_local.oS) is referenced by DSO /usr/bin/ld: final link failed: Nonrepresentable section on output collect2: ld returned 1 exit status make[1]: *** [gp-dyn] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/export/home/orion/redhat/pari-2.1.7/pari-2.1.7/Olinux-i686' make: *** [gp] Error 2 That I get on my FC5 w/updates-testing i386 box. Asking about the non-pic error on the extras list. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 24 18:35:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 May 2006 14:35:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192439] Review Request: fedora-xgl-settings In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605241835.k4OIZxXq022706@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fedora-xgl-settings https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192439 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE OtherBugsDependingO|163776 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-05-24 14:28 EST ------- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 192438 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 24 18:36:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 May 2006 14:36:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192438] Review Request: fedora-xgl-settings In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605241836.k4OIa02n022723@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fedora-xgl-settings https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192438 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-05-24 14:28 EST ------- *** Bug 192439 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 24 18:39:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 May 2006 14:39:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191402] Review Request: mercurial-0.9 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605241839.k4OIdcNs023310@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mercurial-0.9 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191402 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG OtherBugsDependingO|163776, 177841 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-05-24 14:32 EST ------- Closing; mercurial is 0.9 is already in FC5 and rawhide; maintained by Jeremy Katz. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 24 18:46:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 May 2006 14:46:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192285] Review Request: isic -- IP Stack Integrity Checker In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605241846.k4OIkKYv024435@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: isic -- IP Stack Integrity Checker https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192285 jwilson at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From jwilson at redhat.com 2006-05-24 14:38 EST ------- Packages built for devel tree and FC5, closing ticket. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 24 19:27:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 May 2006 15:27:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191594] Review Request: gtkglextmm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605241927.k4OJRVFD028713@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtkglextmm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191594 gilles.gagniard at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 24 19:35:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 May 2006 15:35:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192413] libdhcp : IPv6 and IPv4 DHCP client and network configuration library API In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605241935.k4OJZRHA029647@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: libdhcp : IPv6 and IPv4 DHCP client and network configuration library API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192413 jvdias at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |notting at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From jvdias at redhat.com 2006-05-24 15:27 EST ------- Now that the review has been approved, please can someone add 'libdhcp' to the FC dist collection so I can build it. Latest version is libdhcp-1.2-1.beta and is checked in to CVS. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 24 19:39:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 May 2006 15:39:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192413] libdhcp : IPv6 and IPv4 DHCP client and network configuration library API In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605241939.k4OJdNnI030131@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: libdhcp : IPv6 and IPv4 DHCP client and network configuration library API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192413 ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-05-24 15:31 EST ------- Techlead (Bill) has to approve, will this change anything for the installer team? Contact jeremy katz if so, what about comps? Will this need to be listed on its own, or will it be a Requires, or BuildRequires of something already in comps? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 24 19:58:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 May 2006 15:58:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192413] libdhcp : IPv6 and IPv4 DHCP client and network configuration library API In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605241958.k4OJwlb0031844@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: libdhcp : IPv6 and IPv4 DHCP client and network configuration library API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192413 ------- Additional Comments From notting at redhat.com 2006-05-24 15:50 EST ------- So, as I understand it, the architecture is something like: libdhcp static libs -> linked into dhcp clients libdhcp static libs -> linked into shared libdhcpclient{4,6} libdhcp -> built on top of static dhcp libs and shared libdhcpclient{4,6} Seems like an overly complex architecture, but... *shrug*. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 24 20:01:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 May 2006 16:01:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192413] libdhcp : IPv6 and IPv4 DHCP client and network configuration library API In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605242001.k4OK1Urt032063@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: libdhcp : IPv6 and IPv4 DHCP client and network configuration library API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192413 ------- Additional Comments From notting at redhat.com 2006-05-24 15:53 EST ------- Oh, and there's dhcdbd which provides yet another slightly different code path. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 24 20:15:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 May 2006 16:15:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193054] New: Review Request: pyogg Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193054 Summary: Review Request: pyogg Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: gilles.gagniard at gmail.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://jaile.ath.cx/gilles/fedora_core_5/pyogg.spec SRPM URL: http://jaile.ath.cx/gilles/fedora_core_5/pyogg-1.3-1.src.rpm Description: pyogg is a python wrapper for libogg, a library to read Ogg files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 24 20:15:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 May 2006 16:15:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 181599] Review Request: gallery: web based photo album software In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605242015.k4OKFdPm000508@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gallery: web based photo album software https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=181599 ------- Additional Comments From jwb at redhat.com 2006-05-24 16:08 EST ------- Updated to SVN snapshot of today's BRANCH_2_1 and re-rolled packages: SPEC: http://www.berningeronline.net/gallery2.spec SRPM: http://www.berningeronline.net/gallery2-2.1-0.14cvs20060524.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 24 20:26:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 May 2006 16:26:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192413] libdhcp : IPv6 and IPv4 DHCP client and network configuration library API In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605242026.k4OKQ9AT001239@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: libdhcp : IPv6 and IPv4 DHCP client and network configuration library API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192413 ------- Additional Comments From dcantrel at redhat.com 2006-05-24 16:18 EST ------- My two cents... libdhcp is a step in the right direction, but what we really need for anaconda now is a drop-in replacement for pump so that we can add IPv6 support rather quickly. After reading the code and some of the patches to the ISC software, I would rate this software of alpha quality. It's clearly under heavy development still and it's not really something that I'd like to move anaconda to right now. The last part that concerns me (again, regarding anaconda) is that this library execs the actual DHCP clients. Is this necessary? Pump is able to do IPv4 DHCP in a handful of C files. Pump is great because we can link it right in to the loader and have no other external requirements. This is very important for bring up on new architectures and/or painful architectures (e.g., zSeries). I'm not sure that libdhcp is the best move for anaconda. If the drop-in replacement for pump existed, that would be good. A library that doesn't require the clients, that would be good. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 24 20:27:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 May 2006 16:27:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193059] New: Review Request: ibmasm Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193059 Summary: Review Request: ibmasm Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: konradr at redhat.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.darnok.org/ibmasm/3.0-4/SRPMS/ibmasm.spec SRPM URL: http://www.darnok.org/ibmasm/3.0-4/SRPMS/ibmasm-3.0-4.src.rpm Description: This package contains the tools necessary to utilize the IBM Advanced System Management driver. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 24 20:36:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 May 2006 16:36:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192413] libdhcp : IPv6 and IPv4 DHCP client and network configuration library API In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605242036.k4OKaMHp001813@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: libdhcp : IPv6 and IPv4 DHCP client and network configuration library API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192413 ------- Additional Comments From jvdias at redhat.com 2006-05-24 16:28 EST ------- In reply to Comment #25 From David Cantrell (dcantrel at redhat.com) on 2006-05-24 16:18 EST: libdhcp DOES NOT REQUIRE ANY DHCP CLIENTS OR EXEC ANY DHCP CLIENT PROCESS . Please read the README file shipped in the distribution. libdhcp RUNS the DHCP client code in same process as the invoking program, from libraries linked into to the invoker. That way, we do not have to develop and maintain DHCP and DHCPv6 client protocol implementations from scratch - we can re-use the same code used for the FC dhclient and dhcp6c programs, but run from within one process. The DHCP and DHCPv6 protocols are separate protocols, with separate ports, message types and options. A drop-in replacement for pump is now being tested and will be submitted today. In reply to Comment #23 and Comment #24 From Bill Nottingham (notting at redhat.com) on 2006-05-24 15:53: Hi Bill - RE: architecture question : Not quite . libdhcp provides a callback mechanism whereby DHCP client code can be invoked from user code in the same process, and user code can receive and process the lease information; it also provides a 'Network Interface Configuration' (NIC) library to configure network parameters from either DHCP or static configurations, similar to and as an intended replacement for the libpump library used by anaconda, using the libnl Netlink library. Then libdhcp4client provides the ISC DHCPv4 client in a library, and libdhcp6client provides the DHCPv6 client in a library, which use the libdhcp interface to enable invocation from user programs and processing of the lease information by user programs. The libdhcp{4,6}client libraries contain all the objects that the DHCP client programs are built from. They are in fact just the client programs with a renamed 'main()' function, modified to free all memory and reinitialize globals on return of the modified main(). libdhcp{4,6}client libraries link to no other shared libraries except libc - they contain all the objects from the dh{p,pv6}-client build. libdhcp, libdhcp4client and libdhcp6client all build both shared and static versions of themselves. libdhcp requires only to be linked to a shared or static libdhcp{4,6}client library, depending on the functions used by the invoking program. For example, if only NIC functions are used by a libdhcp using program, the linker will not complain about omitting -ldhcp4client or -ldhcp6client from the link command, and the program will run fine without linking to the dhcpclient libraries. IE. linking to the libdhcp{4,6}client libraries or including the dhcp client headers is entirely optional depending on how libdhcp is used by the program that links to it. libdhcp contains objects which link to libdhcp4client, libdhcp6client, and libnl - depending on which objects an invoking program uses, some or all of these libraries may need to be linked in to the invoking program. RE: dhcdbd issue - dhcdbd is intended for a totally different purpose, to maintain a lease database and distribute lease information to D-BUS listeners. libdhcp is meant to be used by programs such as anaconda's loader2 that require a library to do both static network configuration and to do dhcp in the same process, without exec-ing other programs or depending on external daemons running. The only library that can do this currently is libpump, which is not DHCPv6 capable - hence the need for libdhcp. However, it's quite possible a future version of dhcdbd could do away with having to exec the clients and parse the options from environment variable setting strings by using libdhcp. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 24 21:03:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 May 2006 17:03:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193054] Review Request: pyogg In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605242103.k4OL3Qdc003753@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyogg https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193054 ------- Additional Comments From hugo at devin.com.br 2006-05-24 16:55 EST ------- Hi Gilles, This package is already submitted to Review, as the Bug #192490 shows. Also, there's a python-vorbis plugin too, located at Bug #192491, that relates to it and is dependant. For avoiding duplicate efforts, please see the https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/showdependencytree.cgi?id=163776 and https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/showdependencytree.cgi?id=163778 and look for already existing packages in the process. I have done this mistake on not looking before, so I know how it is :( BTW, thanks for your package submission. We're glad to receive contributions, and if you're willing to help with this package, you can also post comments about the other specfile and package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 24 21:11:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 May 2006 17:11:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192413] libdhcp : IPv6 and IPv4 DHCP client and network configuration library API In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605242111.k4OLBWCU004171@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: libdhcp : IPv6 and IPv4 DHCP client and network configuration library API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192413 ------- Additional Comments From dcantrel at redhat.com 2006-05-24 17:04 EST ------- (In reply to comment #26) > In reply to Comment #25 From David Cantrell (dcantrel at redhat.com) on 2006-05-24 > 16:18 EST: > > libdhcp DOES NOT REQUIRE ANY DHCP CLIENTS OR EXEC ANY DHCP CLIENT PROCESS . It doesn't? Perhaps I'm just drowning in a sea of code then. At the top of your README file, I see this: LIBDHCP enables programs to invoke the ISC dhclient (IPv4 DHCP) and DHCPv6 client (IPv6 DHCP) libraries, libdhcp4client and libdhcp6client, within one process, and to use the lease objects returned to configure network interface parameters. I read the two patches to the dhcp package before looking at libdhcp (because I couldn't get libdhcp source before seeing the dhcp patches). While I don't hack on ISC dhcp, I do know that dhclient was it for a while. There was no library. And looking at the code now, I see there's still no library. So this is why I assumed libdhcp4client and libdhcp6client just exec the appropriate client and send info back to libdhcp. Looking at /usr/include/dhcp4client/isc-dhcp/dhcp4client.h and then the one for IPv6, I only see one function prototype and it looks like an entry point for execing the client daemon to me. If I am going to use this, I'd like the API explained better than what I see in the README. Is libnl required? I don't like libnl or libnetlink because both are pretty piss poor 80% solutions. > Please read the README file shipped in the distribution. I did. Many times. Please don't make long lines. > libdhcp RUNS the DHCP client code in same process as the invoking program, > from libraries linked into to the invoker. > > That way, we do not have to develop and maintain DHCP and DHCPv6 client > protocol implementations from scratch - we can re-use the same code > used for the FC dhclient and dhcp6c programs, but run from within > one process. That makes sense to me and that's certainly the right way to go. I'm just not seeing that when I look at ALL of these packages and source files. Too many things with 'dhc' in the name. > The DHCP and DHCPv6 protocols are separate protocols, with separate ports, > message types and options. Right. > A drop-in replacement for pump is now being tested and will be > submitted today. Sounds good. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 24 21:13:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 May 2006 17:13:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192889] Review Request: openais standards based cluster framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605242113.k4OLDUts004343@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: openais standards based cluster framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192889 ------- Additional Comments From sdake at redhat.com 2006-05-24 17:05 EST ------- Paul Thanks for all the help!!! As you can probably tell, I am not expert in RPM packages.. The openais project doesn't allow CFLAGS to be overridden from Make. I think this is an error upstream and will work to get it resolved and a new release issued. I'll also get your other patches merged upstream. Thanks for the patches. The problem you are having with the optflags is that -DOPENAIS_LINUX is not being defined. A few questions about optflags... First how do I use rpmbuild to set the optflags like you have done so I can test out the package build? Second, The code should compile with -O3 for performance reasons. But if optflags is set to -O2 or less, how do I resolve this in the Makefiles? Here is what I am thinking. In the toplevel openais Makefile.inc, I will only add to the CFLAGS variable instead of ever setting it directly. But this brings up the issue of a compile with -O2 and -O3 both specified in the command line. Your expterise would be helpful here. Thanks! -steve -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 24 21:36:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 May 2006 17:36:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192413] libdhcp : IPv6 and IPv4 DHCP client and network configuration library API In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605242136.k4OLa5c3005639@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: libdhcp : IPv6 and IPv4 DHCP client and network configuration library API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192413 ------- Additional Comments From jvdias at redhat.com 2006-05-24 17:28 EST ------- In reply to Comment #27 From David Cantrell (dcantrel at redhat.com) on 2006-05-24 17:04 EST: Yes, documentation has taken back seat to getting everything working and tested, which it now is - I apologize for the confusion. I've begun work on a complete Doxygen documentation set for libdhcp which will explain things much better than my 'README' file first attempt - I'll have finished it and will submit it tomorrow, after I've completed testing & refining the pump interface today. The pump replacement interface includes a 'pump.h' and will define every pump symbol currently used by anaconda, only every use of 'struct in_addr' in the structures will be replaced by an 'ip_addr_t' (a struct sockaddr compatible structure big enough for an IPv6 address, defined in the latest libdhcp source 'ip_addr.h'). The pump functions (eg. setupInterface) will attempt to behave exactly the way pump does in response to the pump structure settings. There will have to be extra members at the end of the pumpNetIntf structure to control libdhcp DHCPv6 / DHCPv4 preferences. RE: > Looking at /usr/include/dhcp4client/isc-dhcp/dhcp4client.h and then the one > for IPv6, I only see one function prototype and it looks like an entry point > for execing the client daemon to me. Each libdhcp{4,6}client library provides only one entry point, which is the client main() function renamed to dhcpv{4,6}_client . The main functions have been modifed not to go into daemon mode, fork any processes etc., or to create any files at all, if running under libdhcp, and also to clean up after themselves - before returning, they free all memory used by the client and reintialize all the global variables used by the client. I've tested running both the clients 100 times in succession in the same process under valgrind and valgrind reports no leaked files, memory or memory access errors from client code. Please re-consider libdhcp for use in anaconda after I've submitted the pump API and the documentation - I'll append a comment to this bug when this is done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 24 21:42:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 May 2006 17:42:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189384] Review Request: python-ruledispatch: A generic function package for Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605242142.k4OLgdLK006275@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-ruledispatch: A generic function package for Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189384 orion at cora.nwra.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |orion at cora.nwra.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From orion at cora.nwra.com 2006-05-24 17:35 EST ------- - I would suggest http://www.turbogears.org/download/index.html as the URL. At least it gives reference to TurboGears. - md5sum matches 0bdec1022ad28a6819abc99e5f2e5b7c RuleDispatch-0.5a0.dev-r2115.tar.gz 0bdec1022ad28a6819abc99e5f2e5b7c RuleDispatch-0.5a0.dev-r2115.tar.gz.srpm - spec is clean and readable. Question: - What's the latest about packaging/ghosting .pyo files? Bad: - doesn't build on x86_64, needs: %{python_sitearch}/RuleDispatch-%{version}.dev_%{svnrev}-py%{pyver}.egg-info %{python_sitearch}/dispatch instead of sitelib. - rpmlint: W: python-ruledispatch invalid-license PSF or ZPL This matches the PKG-INFO file, though the source file don't say anything. W: python-ruledispatch invalid-url (none) - see above. E: python-ruledispatch zero-length /usr/lib64/python2.4/site-packages/RuleDispatch-0.5a0.dev_r2115-py2.4.egg-info/zip-safe -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 24 21:43:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 May 2006 17:43:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193071] New: Review Request: ruby-sqlite3 Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193071 Summary: Review Request: ruby-sqlite3 Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: dlutter at redhat.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/dlutter/yum/spec/ruby-sqlite3.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/dlutter/yum/SRPMS/ruby-sqlite3-1.1.0-2.src.rpm Description: Database driver to access SQLite v.3 databases from Ruby. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 24 22:10:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 May 2006 18:10:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191582] Review Request: xgalaga - Galaga clone for X11 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605242210.k4OMAtPq007502@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xgalaga - Galaga clone for X11 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191582 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 24 22:18:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 May 2006 18:18:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189611] Review Request: milter-regex regular expression based sendmail milter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605242218.k4OMI9xe007723@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: milter-regex regular expression based sendmail milter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189611 orion at cora.nwra.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |orion at cora.nwra.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From orion at cora.nwra.com 2006-05-24 18:10 EST ------- - builds in mock on dev-x86_64 - md5sum matches - license looks good # rpmlint milter-regex E: milter-regex non-standard-uid /var/spool/milter-regex mregex E: milter-regex non-standard-gid /var/spool/milter-regex mregex but okay for this package. Fix: - Not using RPM_OPT_FLAGS. - I think you need Requires: sendmail -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 24 22:23:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 May 2006 18:23:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193071] Review Request: ruby-sqlite3 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605242223.k4OMNMCp007880@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-sqlite3 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193071 ------- Additional Comments From dlutter at redhat.com 2006-05-24 18:15 EST ------- I ran rpmlint on both the SRPM, and an i386 rpm built under rawhide; both produce no output. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 24 22:25:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 May 2006 18:25:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 173459] Review Request: initng In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605242225.k4OMPj38007937@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 ------- Additional Comments From che666 at gmail.com 2006-05-24 18:18 EST ------- what do you think about building initng-usplash in the extras folder and splitting off the main package? usplash is a pure userspace bootsplash using the framebuffer device. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 25 00:11:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 May 2006 20:11:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 169703] Review Request: pari - Number Theory-oriented Computer Algebra System In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605250011.k4P0BscQ011843@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pari - Number Theory-oriented Computer Algebra System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=169703 ------- Additional Comments From gemi at bluewin.ch 2006-05-24 20:04 EST ------- I updated to the latest release 2.3.0: http://math.ifi.unizh.ch/fedora/5/i386/SRPMS.gemi/pari-2.3.0-1.src.rpm http://math.ifi.unizh.ch/fedora/spec/pari.spec I made the following changes: * package split into: pari: contains the shared libraries only pari-devel: the header files, etc. pari-gp: the calculator, this also contains the documentation, but not in the standard doc directory, since they are integral part of the program, and can be opened from within gp pari-emacs: the emacs mode This compiles and runs fine on FC5/i386. It appears that there is no TEXTREL problem anymore, there is no TEXTREL entry on libpari.so.* I hope this also works on x86_64 and ppc. There is also an option to compile with ftlk or qt instead of just X11. This can be used for the plot output. I have not tried this out, however they probably do not add much of functionality over X11 and are mainly used for portability to OSX/Windows. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 25 00:17:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 May 2006 20:17:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187243] Review Request: lazarus : IDE and RAD tool for the free pascal compiler (fpc) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605250017.k4P0Hn55012028@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lazarus : IDE and RAD tool for the free pascal compiler (fpc) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187243 ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2006-05-24 20:10 EST ------- File found but not packaged: /usr/bin/startlazarus Are all those Required packages needed for running lazarus? Remove strip fom %build, let rpmbuild do that. Your comments say enable gtk2, but you Require gtk+, which is gtk1. Is that intended? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 25 01:27:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 May 2006 21:27:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 181599] Review Request: gallery: web based photo album software In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605250127.k4P1RVEh015264@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gallery: web based photo album software https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=181599 ------- Additional Comments From jwb at redhat.com 2006-05-24 21:19 EST ------- Caught a problem with mock builds, need to list subversion as a BuildRequires so we can regenerate the MANIFEST properly. New package: SPEC: http://www.berningeronline.net/gallery2.spec SRPM: http://www.berningeronline.net/gallery2-2.1-0.15cvs20060524.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 25 03:05:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 May 2006 23:05:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192958] Review Request: ejabberd - A distributed, fault-tolerant Jabber/XMPP server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605250305.k4P35Cxs021403@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ejabberd - A distributed, fault-tolerant Jabber/XMPP server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192958 ------- Additional Comments From jeff at ollie.clive.ia.us 2006-05-24 22:57 EST ------- Updated package: Spec URL: http://www.ocjtech.us/ejabberd-1.1.1-2.spec SRPM URL: http://www.ocjtech.us/ejabberd-1.1.1-2.src.rpm %changelog * Wed May 24 2006 Jeffrey C. Ollie - 1.1.1-2 - Munge Makefile.in a bit more... - Change ownership/permissions - not *everything* needs to be owned by ejabberd -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 25 03:13:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 May 2006 23:13:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192575] Review Request: perl-Pipeline In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605250313.k4P3DdJk022076@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Pipeline https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192575 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-05-24 23:05 EST ------- Some notes from the test suite: t/11async................Use of uninitialized value in numeric eq (==) at /builddir/build/BUILD/Pipeline-3.12/blib/lib/Pipeline/Store.pm line 33 during global destruction. Unbalanced string table refcount: (1) for "debug" during global destruction. Unbalanced string table refcount: (1) for "dispatcher" during global destruction. Unbalanced string table refcount: (1) for "parent" during global destruction. Unbalanced string table refcount: (1) for "store" during global destruction. Scalars leaked: 1 ok Not sure what's up here. t/03colour...............skipped all skipped: - do not have Acme::Colour installed t/98compile..............skipped all skipped: - do not have File::Find::Rule installed t/99pod..................skipped all skipped: - do not have Find::File::Rule or Pod::Checker installed All tests successful, 3 tests skipped. Files=19, Tests=71, 1 wallclock secs ( 0.74 cusr + 0.20 csys = 0.94 CPU) Acme::Colour isn't in extras, but the others are and adding them as BR:s gives better coverage: All tests successful, 1 test skipped. Files=19, Tests=125, 2 wallclock secs ( 1.03 cusr + 0.27 csys = 1.30 CPU) I don't think there's any need to package Acme::Colour just for this; it's kind of, uhh, limited in scope anyway. Since there's nothing else of issue with this package, I'll go ahead and approve and you can add those when you check in. * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * dist tag is present. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. License text not included upstream. * source files match upstream: 52cbc818aa18f7307dc00624741e5a73 Pipeline-3.12.tar.gz 52cbc818aa18f7307dc00624741e5a73 Pipeline-3.12.tar.gz-srpm * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane; the duplicate requires come from unversioned dependencies that rpm picks up automatically. perl(Pipeline) = 3.12 perl(Pipeline::Analyser) = 3.12 perl(Pipeline::Base) = 3.12 perl(Pipeline::Dispatch) = 3.12 perl(Pipeline::Dumper) = 3.12 perl(Pipeline::Error::Abstract) = 3.12 perl(Pipeline::Error::AsyncResults) = 3.12 perl(Pipeline::Error::Construction) = 3.12 perl(Pipeline::Production) = 3.12 perl(Pipeline::Segment) = 3.12 perl(Pipeline::Segment::Async) = 3.12 perl(Pipeline::Segment::Async::Fork) = 3.12 perl(Pipeline::Segment::Async::Handler) = 3.12 perl(Pipeline::Segment::Async::IThreads) = 3.12 perl(Pipeline::Segment::Tester) = 3.12 perl(Pipeline::Store) = 3.12 perl(Pipeline::Store::ISA) = 3.12 perl(Pipeline::Store::Simple) = 3.12 perl-Pipeline = 3.12-1.fc6 - perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8) perl(Class::ISA) perl(Config) perl(Data::Structure::Util) >= 0.04 perl(Data::UUID) perl(Data::UUID) >= 0.01 perl(Error) perl(Error) >= 0.15 perl(IO::Handle) perl(IO::Null) >= 0.01 perl(IO::String) >= 0.01 perl(Pipeline) perl(Pipeline::Base) perl(Pipeline::Dispatch) perl(Pipeline::Error::Abstract) perl(Pipeline::Error::AsyncResults) perl(Pipeline::Error::Construction) perl(Pipeline::Segment) perl(Pipeline::Segment::Async::Fork) perl(Pipeline::Segment::Async::Handler) perl(Pipeline::Segment::Async::IThreads) perl(Pipeline::Store) perl(Pipeline::Store::Simple) perl(Scalar::Util) perl(base) perl(strict) perl(warnings) perl(warnings::register) * no shared libraries are present. * package is not relocatable. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * %clean is present. * %check is present and all tests pass (after adding the two BR:s above): All tests successful, 1 test skipped. Files=19, Tests=125, 2 wallclock secs ( 1.03 cusr + 0.27 csys = 1.30 CPU) * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no libtool .la droppings. * not a GUI app. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 25 03:29:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 May 2006 23:29:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192577] Review Request: perl-OpenFrame In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605250329.k4P3T6AM023236@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-OpenFrame https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192577 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |tibbs at math.uh.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 25 03:42:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 May 2006 23:42:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 181599] Review Request: gallery: web based photo album software In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605250342.k4P3g18L023847@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gallery: web based photo album software https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=181599 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-05-24 23:34 EST ------- Oh, just noticed your comment about subversion. I ran into that with the following review as well. It looks like you didn't update your spec/src.rpms with the new BuildRequires: subversion in comment #44? (ie, the spec seems to be -13 still?) See below - Rpmlint output. See below - Package name. OK - Spec file name matches. OK - Package guidelines. OK - Licsense. OK - License field matches in spec. OK - License included in files OK - Spec in american english OK - Spec legible See below - Md5sum of source from upstream See below - Compiles and builds on one arch at least. OK - NO Forbidden buildrequires included OK - All required buildrequires included See below - Locale handling/find_lang. OK - Owns all directories it creates. OK - No duplicate files in %files listing. OK - Permissions on files correct. OK - Clean section correct. OK - Macros consistant. OK - Code not content. OK - Docs must not affect runtime. OK - Doesn't own any files/dirs that are already owned by others. See below - Package builds in mock. See below - Subpackages require base package. 1. Is there any further need to base the package off a snapshot instead of the now current stable release? 2. If the answer to 1 is yes, should the package have svn in the release instead of cvs? See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#head-d97a3f40b6dd9d2288206ac9bd8f1bf9b791b22a 3. The Requires for the subpackages should probibly be: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} Otherwise you can get diffrent 2.1 versions of the various packages installed at the same time. 4. Doesn't build in mock here... I get the following at the end of the build.log: + perl makeManifest.pl Finding all files...Died at makeManifest.pl line 153. error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.63104 (%build) which is a call to svn: open(FD, "svn propget --non-interactive -R svn:mime-type |") or die; Perhaps a missing BuildRequires: subversion I can't tell for sure if this will hit the network during a build. If so, it will fail in the buildsystem. Basing on a non snapshot might fix this issue as well. 5. Can you provide a script used to generate the svn tar.gz snapshot or otherwise describe how to duplicate it? Switching back to the stable version would remove this requirement as well. ;) 6. Perhaps a README.fedora that has info on how to setup the database easily? Or pointers to the docs to do that? 7. You need to use the find_lang macro/setup for locales, you can't just include them in files sections, See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines?#head-8c605ebf8330f6d505f384e671986fa99a8f72ee 8. Lots of rpmlint output: W: gallery2 incoherent-version-in-changelog 2.0-0.13.cvs20060303 2.1-0.14cvs20060524.fc6 E: gallery2 htaccess-file /var/www/gallery2/lib/tools/po/.htaccess E: gallery2 htaccess-file /var/www/gallery2/.htaccess E: gallery2 htaccess-file /var/www/gallery2/lib/tools/bin/.htaccess E: gallery2 htaccess-file /var/www/gallery2/lib/tools/stubs/.htaccess E: gallery2-rewrite htaccess-file /var/www/gallery2/modules/rewrite/data/mod_rewrite_no_options/gallery/.htaccess E: gallery2-rewrite htaccess-file /var/www/gallery2/modules/rewrite/data/mod_rewrite/gallery/.htaccess E: gallery2-rewrite htaccess-file /var/www/gallery2/modules/rewrite/data/mod_rewrite_no_options/custom/.htaccess E: gallery2-rewrite htaccess-file /var/www/gallery2/modules/rewrite/data/mod_rewrite_no_options/gallery2/.htaccess E: gallery2-rewrite htaccess-file /var/www/gallery2/modules/rewrite/data/mod_rewrite/gallery2/.htaccess E: gallery2-rewrite htaccess-file /var/www/gallery2/modules/rewrite/data/mod_rewrite/custom/.htaccess Suggest from rpmlint: htaccess-file : You have individual apache configuration .htaccess file(s) in your package. Replace them by a central configuration file in /etc/httpd/conf.d. Is it possible to fold them into the main gallery2.conf? E: gallery2 non-executable-script /var/www/gallery2/lib/tools/po/premerge-messages.pl 0644 E: gallery2 non-executable-script /var/www/gallery2/lib/tools/po/update-all-translations.pl 0644 E: gallery2 non-executable-script /var/www/gallery2/lib/tools/bin/getIllegalFunctions.pl 0644 E: gallery2 non-executable-script /var/www/gallery2/lib/tools/uml/make-java-classes.pl 0644 E: gallery2 non-executable-script /var/www/gallery2/lib/tools/po/header.pl 0644 Should those scripts be 755? E: gallery2 non-standard-uid /srv/gallery2 apache E: gallery2 non-standard-uid /var/www/gallery2/config.php apache I think those can be ignored. E: gallery2 no-jar-manifest /var/www/gallery2/modules/core/classes/GalleryStorage/g2_db2.jar Something to complain to upstream about? There are tons of these... basically for each subpackage: W: gallery2-albumselect summary-not-capitalized albumselect module for Gallery 2 W: gallery2-albumselect no-documentation No documentation can be ignored. You should go ahead and capitalize the first letter of each Summary. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 25 04:33:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 00:33:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188574] Review Request: rss-glx -- Really Slick Screensavers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605250433.k4P4X0l9024655@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rss-glx -- Really Slick Screensavers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188574 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-05-25 00:25 EST ------- I did some work and found something useful: KDE does this to start the biof (for example) screensaver when you click the "Test" button: kxsrun biof -- --root (this comes from the biof.desktop file). strace'ing this gives (among a big pile of stuff): 8989 access("/usr/libexec/xscreensaver/biof", F_OK) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory) But it was installed in /usr/bin/biof. Symlinking it to where kxsrun wants to see it results in a working screensaver. So I guess it's reasonable to ask why these are in /usr/bin instead of /usr/libexec/xscreensaver. They aren't really useful when called directly, are they? I also noticed that xscreensaver-demo doesn't show any of the new hacks, even after I make the symlink. (I have the rss-glx-xscreensaver package installed.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 25 04:47:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 00:47:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 183912] Review Request: jack-audio-connection-kit - The Jack Audio Connection Kit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605250447.k4P4lbLQ025639@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jack-audio-connection-kit - The Jack Audio Connection Kit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183912 jpmahowald at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|seg at haxxed.com |jpmahowald at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2006-05-25 00:39 EST ------- Reassigning to me, as first reviews need to be from sponsors. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/Contributors Approved, be sure to apply for cvsextras. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 25 04:54:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 00:54:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188574] Review Request: rss-glx -- Really Slick Screensavers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605250454.k4P4smSq025887@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rss-glx -- Really Slick Screensavers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188574 ------- Additional Comments From dennis at ausil.us 2006-05-25 00:47 EST ------- running strings /usr/bin/kxsrun shows up /usr/libexec/xscreensaver If i had to guess there is a hardcoded check there so your two options are move the binaries or symlink them in the kde package. while not useful by themselves you can call them and get a preview in a window -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 25 07:54:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 03:54:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192918] Review Request: kerry - Kerry Beagle is a KDE frontend for the Beagle desktop search In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605250754.k4P7sWrX001297@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kerry - Kerry Beagle is a KDE frontend for the Beagle desktop search https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192918 gauret at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |gauret at free.fr CC|gauret at free.fr | OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From gauret at free.fr 2006-05-25 03:47 EST ------- Needs work: * replace /usr with %{_prefix} * removing *.la files in %_libdir is a good thing, but *.la files in %_libdir/kde3 are usually needed by KDE * The included startup script /usr/share/autostart/beagled.desktop starts beagled, you should add "Requires: beagle" * You may want to add --only-show-in=KDE in the desktop file install command, GNOME users already have frontends to query beagle. Minor: * The comment "Removing statically linked libraries" is wrong, you are removing libtool archive files. Statically linked libs end in ".a" -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 25 08:55:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 04:55:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192918] Review Request: kerry - Kerry Beagle is a KDE frontend for the Beagle desktop search In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605250855.k4P8t3BV006477@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kerry - Kerry Beagle is a KDE frontend for the Beagle desktop search https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192918 ------- Additional Comments From hugo at devin.com.br 2006-05-25 04:47 EST ------- Hi Aurelien! Thanks for your input on this. Before I update the specfile, let me comment some things. > * replace /usr with %{_prefix} Done. > * removing *.la files in %_libdir is a good thing, but *.la files in > %_libdir/kde3 are usually needed by KDE I came across this problem with some other packages, but I tested this package and it appears that it's fully working without the %{_libdir}/kde3/*.la files. But to be sure, I'm including again in the next spec. What do you think? > * The included startup script /usr/share/autostart/beagled.desktop starts > beagled, you should add "Requires: beagle" I thought that Requires should never be used. I verified its dependencies and it depends only on libbeagle. Maybe this is an exception? What do you think? I think I can put :-) > * You may want to add --only-show-in=KDE in the desktop file install > command, GNOME users already have frontends to query beagle. I didn't know that, thanks for letting me know :) > > Minor: > * The comment "Removing statically linked libraries" is wrong, you are > removing libtool archive files. Statically linked libs end in ".a" Fixed! I got confused, thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 25 09:04:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 05:04:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189611] Review Request: milter-regex regular expression based sendmail milter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605250904.k4P94ArD006952@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: milter-regex regular expression based sendmail milter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189611 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-05-25 04:56 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) Fix: > > - Not using RPM_OPT_FLAGS. > - I think you need Requires: sendmail Fixed in -5: http://www.city-fan.org/~paul/extras/milter-regex/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 25 09:04:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 05:04:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192918] Review Request: kerry - Kerry Beagle is a KDE frontend for the Beagle desktop search In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605250904.k4P94smg007018@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kerry - Kerry Beagle is a KDE frontend for the Beagle desktop search https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192918 ------- Additional Comments From hugo at devin.com.br 2006-05-25 04:57 EST ------- Just for information: Error on option --only-show-in=KDE: unknown option. Run 'desktop-file-install --help' to see a full list of available command line options. Looking in --help, the option is "--add-only-show-in". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 25 09:23:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 05:23:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192889] Review Request: openais standards based cluster framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605250923.k4P9NXpG007749@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: openais standards based cluster framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192889 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-05-25 05:15 EST ------- (In reply to comment #15) > The openais project doesn't allow CFLAGS to be overridden from Make. I think > this is an error upstream and will work to get it resolved and a new release > issued. Good; I had a quick look at the Makefile and I thought it was just adding to CFLAGS but I was mistaken. > I'll also get your other patches merged upstream. Thanks for the patches. No problem. > The problem you are having with the optflags is that -DOPENAIS_LINUX is not > being defined. > > A few questions about optflags... > > First how do I use rpmbuild to set the optflags like you have done so I can test > out the package build? > > Second, The code should compile with -O3 for performance reasons. But if > optflags is set to -O2 or less, how do I resolve this in the Makefiles? > > Here is what I am thinking. > > In the toplevel openais Makefile.inc, I will only add to the CFLAGS variable > instead of ever setting it directly. But this brings up the issue of a compile > with -O2 and -O3 both specified in the command line. Getting it to honor %optflags and use -O3 isn't too difficult actually, and can be done with a bit of sed trickery. Use this for the %build section of the spec: %build # The code should compile with -O3 for performance reasons CFLAGS="$(echo '%{optflags}' | sed -e 's/-O[0-9]*//') -O3 -DOPENAIS_LINUX" make CFLAGS="$CFLAGS" The spec file from Comment #12 modified in this way builds successfully in mock, at least on i386. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 25 09:31:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 05:31:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192490] Review Request: python-ogg - A Python wrapper for the Ogg libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605250931.k4P9VcIm007968@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-ogg - A Python wrapper for the Ogg libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192490 gauret at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |gauret at free.fr OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From gauret at free.fr 2006-05-25 05:23 EST ------- * Please make a separate python-ogg-devel, because it will "Requires: libogg-devel" ( the libogg header file is included at the top of /usr/include/python2.4/pyogg/pyogg.h) * Duplicate BuildRequires: libogg is already required by libogg-devel. In general, -devel subpackages require their main package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 25 09:39:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 05:39:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192918] Review Request: kerry - Kerry Beagle is a KDE frontend for the Beagle desktop search In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605250939.k4P9d8nB008408@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kerry - Kerry Beagle is a KDE frontend for the Beagle desktop search https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192918 ------- Additional Comments From gauret at free.fr 2006-05-25 05:31 EST ------- > I came across this problem with some other packages, but I tested this package > and it appears that it's fully working without the %{_libdir}/kde3/*.la files. > But to be sure, I'm including again in the next spec. What do you think? It's up to you, but if you decide to leave them out, make sure you test thoroughly each update. If it were me, I'd choose to stay on the safe side and include them. > I thought that Requires should never be used. I verified its dependencies and > it depends only on libbeagle. Maybe this is an exception? What do you think? Explicit Requires are usually useless because they are picked up by RPM when it runs ldd on the binaries. But here, libbeagle is splitted out of the main beagle package, which contains the search engine. Since the startup script in /usr/share/autostart runs "beagled --bg" and beagled is in the beagle package, Require'ing it seems necessary to me. > Looking in --help, the option is "--add-only-show-in". Ah, right, my mistake. I should have checked, I know my memory is not to be trusted... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 25 09:44:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 05:44:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192491] Review Request: python-vorbis - A Python wrapper for the Ogg Vorbis audio libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605250944.k4P9iAsR008674@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-vorbis - A Python wrapper for the Ogg Vorbis audio libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192491 gauret at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |gauret at free.fr OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From gauret at free.fr 2006-05-25 05:36 EST ------- You should Buildrequire python-ogg-devel (which will already require libogg-devel, which requires libogg) -> in the end you only need to buildrequire python-devel, libogg-devel and libvorbis-devel -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 25 09:47:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 05:47:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 175047] Review Request: NetworkManager-openvpn In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605250947.k4P9l6Sc008940@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: NetworkManager-openvpn https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175047 gauret at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |gauret at free.fr ------- Additional Comments From gauret at free.fr 2006-05-25 05:39 EST ------- Ping ? Any news ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 25 09:58:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 05:58:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187243] Review Request: lazarus : IDE and RAD tool for the free pascal compiler (fpc) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605250958.k4P9wcOI009418@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lazarus : IDE and RAD tool for the free pascal compiler (fpc) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187243 ------- Additional Comments From joost at cnoc.nl 2006-05-25 05:51 EST ------- Fixed the lost file and removed the strip. I didn't even knew that rpmbuild did that. The only packages which are needed to run lazarus are: fpc-src, gtk+ and gdk-pixbuf. But if you want to compile a program in lazarus, you need the compiler (fpc) + binutils, the -devel packages and in most cases glibc. If you want to debug your program you also need gdb. So those packages are stricly not needed for running lazarus, but since most users will use it to make and compile programs, I included them. (They also aren't detected by rpmbuild as dependencies) Lazarus is able to create gtk1 and gtk2 applications. For Lazarus itself the default is 'gtk1', since the LCL-gtk1-interface is more stable. So Lazarus needs gtk1-to run. (it's a gtk1-application) But I enabled the option to make gtk2-applications with Lazarus. But you're right, gtk2 must also be added as buildrequirement for that. I won't add it to the normal requirements, though, since applications are default build as gtk1. If some user switches that to gtk2, he can think of himself that he has to install gtk2(-devel). Spec: http://www.cnoc.nl/fpc/lazarus.spec SRPM: http://www.cnoc.nl/fpc/lazarus-0.9.14-5.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 25 10:03:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 06:03:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192918] Review Request: kerry - Kerry Beagle is a KDE frontend for the Beagle desktop search In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605251003.k4PA3GMp009703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kerry - Kerry Beagle is a KDE frontend for the Beagle desktop search https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192918 ------- Additional Comments From hugo at devin.com.br 2006-05-25 05:55 EST ------- Updated package: Spec URL: http://www.devin.com.br/eitch/rpm/fedora/SPECS/kerry.spec SRPM URL: http://www.devin.com.br/eitch/rpm/fedora/5/SRPMS/kerry-0.1.1-2.src.rpm Changes: - Added kerry.la to libdir/kde3 as KDE applications requires - Updated desktop-file-install with '--only-show-in=KDE' - Added beagle as a dependency since kerry it -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 25 10:10:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 06:10:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189088] Review Request: knemo Network monitor applet. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605251010.k4PAACAG009967@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: knemo Network monitor applet. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189088 ------- Additional Comments From gauret at free.fr 2006-05-25 06:02 EST ------- Needs work: * Desktop files installed in %{_datadir}/applications/kde don't need the "--vendor fedora" namespace, they already have kde (they are in the kde subdir). * As a consequence, you don't need to rename them afterwards. Notes: * Why drop the keywords from the desktop file ? (really) Minor: * The Patch0 line and the "--add-category X-KDE-settings-network" are not properly lined-up (tab instead of spaces) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 25 10:10:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 06:10:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190156] Review Request: php-pear-HTTP In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605251010.k4PAAm9O010034@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-HTTP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190156 gauret at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 25 10:11:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 06:11:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192491] Review Request: python-vorbis - A Python wrapper for the Ogg Vorbis audio libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605251011.k4PABvod010103@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-vorbis - A Python wrapper for the Ogg Vorbis audio libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192491 gauret at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 25 10:12:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 06:12:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192490] Review Request: python-ogg - A Python wrapper for the Ogg libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605251012.k4PACG9G010135@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-ogg - A Python wrapper for the Ogg libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192490 gauret at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 25 10:13:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 06:13:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189088] Review Request: knemo Network monitor applet. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605251013.k4PAD5xq010181@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: knemo Network monitor applet. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189088 gauret at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|gauret at free.fr | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 25 10:19:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 06:19:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189088] Review Request: knemo Network monitor applet. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605251019.k4PAJBV5010451@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: knemo Network monitor applet. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189088 ------- Additional Comments From hugo at devin.com.br 2006-05-25 06:11 EST ------- Package updated: Spec URL: http://www.devin.com.br/eitch/rpm/fedora/SPECS/knemo.spec SRPM URL: http://www.devin.com.br/eitch/rpm/fedora/5/SRPMS/knemo-0.4.0-3.src.rpm Changes: - Removed vendor option from deskto-file-install (no renaming) Notes: > * Why drop the keywords from the desktop file ? rpmbuild and desktop-file-install were complaining like hell about these keywords, so I got it out :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 25 10:29:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 06:29:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192490] Review Request: python-ogg - A Python wrapper for the Ogg libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605251029.k4PATcvO010898@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-ogg - A Python wrapper for the Ogg libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192490 ------- Additional Comments From hugo at devin.com.br 2006-05-25 06:21 EST ------- Updated package: Spec URL: http://www.devin.com.br/eitch/rpm/fedora/SPECS/python-ogg.spec SRPM URL: http://www.devin.com.br/eitch/rpm/fedora/5/SRPMS/python-ogg-1.3-2.src.rpm Changes: - Forked the package with a -devel one including the header. Notes: Thanks for pointing out about the BuildRequires duplicate. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 25 10:37:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 06:37:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192491] Review Request: python-vorbis - A Python wrapper for the Ogg Vorbis audio libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605251037.k4PAb6Jt011135@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-vorbis - A Python wrapper for the Ogg Vorbis audio libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192491 ------- Additional Comments From hugo at devin.com.br 2006-05-25 06:29 EST ------- Package Updated: Spec URL: http://www.devin.com.br/eitch/rpm/fedora/SPECS/python-vorbis.spec SRPM URL: http://www.devin.com.br/eitch/rpm/fedora/5/SRPMS/python-vorbis-1.3-2.src.rpm Changes: - Improvements in BuildRequires dependencies (point to python-ogg) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 25 10:52:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 06:52:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193102] New: Review Request: python-mad Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193102 Summary: Review Request: python-mad Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: karlthered at gmail.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://darkenphoenix.free.fr/RPMS/RPMS/Extras/SPECS/python-mad.spec SRPM URL: http://darkenphoenix.free.fr/RPMS/RPMS/Extras/SRPMS/python-mad-0.5.1.src.rpm Description: Python Bindings to libmad This is my first package and I need a sponsor -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 25 10:54:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 06:54:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193103] New: Review Request: Listen Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193103 Summary: Review Request: Listen Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: karlthered at gmail.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://darkenphoenix.free.fr/RPMS/RPMS/Extras/SPECS/listen.spec SRPM URL: http://darkenphoenix.free.fr/RPMS/RPMS/Extras/SRPMS/listen-0.4.3-2.src.rpm Description: Listen is a music manager and player for GNOME Needs python-ogg, python-vorbis and python-mad https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193102 I need a sponsor -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 25 10:57:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 06:57:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193105] New: Review Request: Pessulus Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193105 Summary: Review Request: Pessulus Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: karlthered at gmail.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://darkenphoenix.free.fr/RPMS/RPMS/Extras/SPECS/pessulus.spec SRPM URL: http://darkenphoenix.free.fr/RPMS/RPMS/Extras/SRPMS/pessulus-0.10.1-1.src.rpm Description: Lockdown editor for GNOME Desktop This one of my first packages, I need a sponsor -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 25 10:59:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 06:59:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193106] New: Review Request: gtkmozembedmm Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193106 Summary: Review Request: gtkmozembedmm Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: karlthered at gmail.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://darkenphoenix.free.fr/RPMS/RPMS/Extras/SPECS/gtkmozembedmm.spec SRPM URL: http://darkenphoenix.free.fr/RPMS/RPMS/Extras/SRPMS/gtkmozembedmm-1.4.2-1.src.rpm Description: C++ bindings to libgtkembedmoz This is one of my first packages, I need a sponsor -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 25 11:02:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 07:02:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193107] New: Review Request: gtkglextmm Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193107 Summary: Review Request: gtkglextmm Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: karlthered at gmail.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://darkenphoenix.free.fr/RPMS/RPMS/Extras/SPECS/gtkglextmm.spec SRPM URL: http://darkenphoenix.free.fr/RPMS/RPMS/Extras/SRPMS/gtkglextmm-1.2.0-1.src.rpm Description: C++ Bindings to gtkglext this one of my first packages, I need a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 25 11:03:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 07:03:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193108] New: Review Request: libsexymm Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193108 Summary: Review Request: libsexymm Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: karlthered at gmail.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://darkenphoenix.free.fr/RPMS/RPMS/Extras/SPECS/libsexy.spec SRPM URL: http://darkenphoenix.free.fr/RPMS/RPMS/Extras/SRPMS/libsexymm-0.1.7-1.src.rpm Description: C++ bindings to libsexy -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 25 11:07:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 07:07:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193109] New: Review Request: plotmm Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193109 Summary: Review Request: plotmm Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: karlthered at gmail.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://darkenphoenix.free.fr/RPMS/RPMS/Extras/SPECS/plotmm.spec SRPM URL: http://darkenphoenix.free.fr/RPMS/RPMS/Extras/SRPMS/plotmm-0.1.2-1.src.rpm Description: GTKmm plot widget for scientific applications. This is one of my first packages, I need a sponsor -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 25 11:14:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 07:14:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193102] Review Request: python-mad In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605251114.k4PBECQJ012930@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-mad https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193102 ville.skytta at iki.fi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |CANTFIX OtherBugsDependingO|163776 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2006-05-25 07:06 EST ------- Not acceptable for Fedora Extras: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/ForbiddenItems?#head-69c9770fc2ef79ea9a691d03aa2f475eed113bfa -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 25 11:15:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 07:15:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 173459] Review Request: initng In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605251115.k4PBFHVL013001@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 ------- Additional Comments From daner964 at student.liu.se 2006-05-25 07:07 EST ------- (In reply to comment #307) > #define SEND() (send(fd, &rep, sizeof(bp_rep), 0) == (signed) sizeof(bp_rep)) > whitout a if this does not make any sense... Fixed in upstreams svn now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 25 11:15:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 07:15:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193110] New: Review Request: python-sexy Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193110 Summary: Review Request: python-sexy Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: karlthered at gmail.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://darkenphoenix.free.fr/RPMS/RPMS/Extras/SPECS/python-sexy.spec SRPM URL: http://darkenphoenix.free.fr/RPMS/RPMS/Extras/SRPMS/python-sexy-0.1.8-1.src.rpm Description: python bindings to libsexy This is one of my first packages, I need a sponsor -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 25 11:16:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 07:16:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193105] Review Request: Pessulus In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605251116.k4PBGxBr013152@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Pessulus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193105 ville.skytta at iki.fi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE OtherBugsDependingO|163776 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2006-05-25 07:09 EST ------- Already in FE. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 188205 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 25 11:17:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 07:17:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188205] Review Request: pessulus-0.9 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605251117.k4PBHKEL013177@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pessulus-0.9 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188205 ville.skytta at iki.fi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |karlthered at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2006-05-25 07:09 EST ------- *** Bug 193105 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 25 11:17:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 07:17:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 183912] Review Request: jack-audio-connection-kit - The Jack Audio Connection Kit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605251117.k4PBHuH4013208@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jack-audio-connection-kit - The Jack Audio Connection Kit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183912 ------- Additional Comments From andy at smile.org.ua 2006-05-25 07:10 EST ------- John, I've done register as fedora membership, but cvsextras group is unapproved for me now. What do I need to do? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 25 11:20:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 07:20:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193103] Review Request: Listen In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605251120.k4PBKA6L013319@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Listen https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193103 ville.skytta at iki.fi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |192490, 192491, 193102 OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | Bug 193103 depends on bug 193102, which changed state. Bug 193102 Summary: Review Request: python-mad https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193102 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |CANTFIX Status|NEW |CLOSED ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2006-05-25 07:12 EST ------- If the dependency on python-mad can't be avoided, this cannot be included in FE. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 25 11:20:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 07:20:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193102] Review Request: python-mad In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605251120.k4PBKLpT013337@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-mad https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193102 ville.skytta at iki.fi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |193103 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 25 11:20:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 07:20:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192491] Review Request: python-vorbis - A Python wrapper for the Ogg Vorbis audio libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605251120.k4PBKhIk013377@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-vorbis - A Python wrapper for the Ogg Vorbis audio libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192491 ville.skytta at iki.fi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |193103 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 25 11:21:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 07:21:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192918] Review Request: kerry - Kerry Beagle is a KDE frontend for the Beagle desktop search In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605251121.k4PBL19A013416@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kerry - Kerry Beagle is a KDE frontend for the Beagle desktop search https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192918 gauret at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From gauret at free.fr 2006-05-25 07:13 EST ------- Review for release 2: * RPM name is OK * Source kerry-0.1.1.tar.bz2 is the same as upstream * Builds fine in mock * rpmlint looks OK * File list looks OK * Works fine APPROVED Notes: Changelog last entry: you forgot "requires" in the last line. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 25 11:21:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 07:21:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192490] Review Request: python-ogg - A Python wrapper for the Ogg libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605251121.k4PBL5Mp013437@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-ogg - A Python wrapper for the Ogg libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192490 ville.skytta at iki.fi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |193103 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 25 11:22:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 07:22:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193107] Review Request: gtkglextmm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605251122.k4PBMCbZ013521@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtkglextmm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193107 ville.skytta at iki.fi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE OtherBugsDependingO|163776 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2006-05-25 07:14 EST ------- Already in FE. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 191594 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 25 11:22:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 07:22:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191594] Review Request: gtkglextmm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605251122.k4PBMXLj013553@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtkglextmm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191594 ville.skytta at iki.fi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |karlthered at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2006-05-25 07:14 EST ------- *** Bug 193107 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 25 11:54:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 07:54:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 173459] Review Request: initng In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605251154.k4PBsGJl015286@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 ------- Additional Comments From dragoran at feuerpokemon.de 2006-05-25 07:46 EST ------- (In reply to comment #309) > (In reply to comment #307) > > #define SEND() (send(fd, &rep, sizeof(bp_rep), 0) == (signed) sizeof(bp_rep)) > > whitout a if this does not make any sense... > > Fixed in upstreams svn now. still broken: cc1: warnings being treated as errors /home/dragoran/rpm/BUILD/initng-0.6.7/plugins/bash_parser/runiscript.c: In function 'main': /home/dragoran/rpm/BUILD/initng-0.6.7/plugins/bash_parser/runiscript.c:50: warning: ignoring return value of 'getcwd', declared with attribute warn_unused_result -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 25 11:54:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 07:54:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193103] Review Request: Listen In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605251154.k4PBsVdj015333@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Listen https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193103 ------- Additional Comments From hugo at devin.com.br 2006-05-25 07:46 EST ------- I began packaging this, but I saw that it requires libmad and it contains mp3 code in the tarball. This is not allowed in Extras, and a patch would be a little difficult to create (maybe talking with upstream). An alternative would be to put the package in a third-party repository. BTW, python-ogg and python-vorbis will be commited shortly (I Hope ;) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 25 11:56:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 07:56:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 179040] Review Request: socat In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605251156.k4PBuVFQ015443@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: socat https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=179040 gilboad at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |gilboad at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From gilboad at gmail.com 2006-05-25 07:49 EST ------- I'm getting the same error (as the mock build) on FC5/x86_64. -However-, when I try to manually build the source tar.bz2, (configure --prefix=/usr && make -j 8) it builds just fine. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 25 12:02:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 08:02:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 179040] Review Request: socat In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605251202.k4PC22JF015721@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: socat https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=179040 ------- Additional Comments From gilboad at gmail.com 2006-05-25 07:54 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=129980) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=129980&action=view) FC5/x86_64 failed build log -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 25 12:03:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 08:03:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192490] Review Request: python-ogg - A Python wrapper for the Ogg libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605251203.k4PC3FTi015786@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-ogg - A Python wrapper for the Ogg libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192490 ------- Additional Comments From gauret at free.fr 2006-05-25 07:55 EST ------- The -devel package should explicitely Require libogg-devel -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 25 12:05:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 08:05:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192491] Review Request: python-vorbis - A Python wrapper for the Ogg Vorbis audio libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605251205.k4PC5jZ0015931@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-vorbis - A Python wrapper for the Ogg Vorbis audio libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192491 ------- Additional Comments From gauret at free.fr 2006-05-25 07:58 EST ------- You don't need to BuildRequire python-ogg, it will be added by python-ogg-devel -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 25 12:05:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 08:05:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177104] Review Request: abook - Text-based addressbook program for mutt In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605251205.k4PC5gjE015923@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: abook - Text-based addressbook program for mutt https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177104 bugs.michael at gmx.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO_REPORTER -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 25 12:09:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 08:09:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192490] Review Request: python-ogg - A Python wrapper for the Ogg libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605251209.k4PC90ZA016027@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-ogg - A Python wrapper for the Ogg libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192490 ------- Additional Comments From hugo at devin.com.br 2006-05-25 08:01 EST ------- Done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 25 12:12:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 08:12:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192491] Review Request: python-vorbis - A Python wrapper for the Ogg Vorbis audio libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605251212.k4PCCC4A016141@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-vorbis - A Python wrapper for the Ogg Vorbis audio libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192491 ------- Additional Comments From hugo at devin.com.br 2006-05-25 08:04 EST ------- Done, thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 25 12:12:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 08:12:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191005] Review Request: glob2 - Realtime Strategy game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605251212.k4PCCT6U016182@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glob2 - Realtime Strategy game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191005 ------- Additional Comments From bugs.michael at gmx.net 2006-05-25 08:04 EST ------- > The rpmbuild complains if my Requires line is empty (everything > needed to run is also needed to compile). I will leave SDL only, > to stop it from complaining. This doesn't sound right. Just delete the empty "Requires" line. And SDL most certainly is in the automatic soname dependencies. Query your binary package: rpm -qp --requires filename.i386.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 25 12:24:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 08:24:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193103] Review Request: Listen In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605251224.k4PCOsAw016571@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Listen https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193103 ------- Additional Comments From karlthered at gmail.com 2006-05-25 08:17 EST ------- In fact, the dependency against libmad is not mandatory to build and use Listen with free formats (for proprietary formats, just need to install the right packages), just need to patch check.py to finish the build. here are new spec and SRPMS http://darkenphoenix.free.fr/RPMS/RPMS/Extras/SPECS/listen.spec http://darkenphoenix.free.fr/RPMS/RPMS/Extras/SRPMS/listen-0.4.3-3.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 25 13:49:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 09:49:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193110] Review Request: python-sexy In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605251349.k4PDnxfb021482@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-sexy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193110 ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at ameritech.net 2006-05-25 09:42 EST ------- Couple of quick notes: 1. Drop the Requires on libsexy, since the soname from the BR on libsexy-devel will pull this in. 2. Drop the BR on python, since you have a BR on python-devel which will pull this in. 3. Look at the python packaging guidelines. A lot of issues with the spec (in particular the %files section) can be fixed with the suggestions from there. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Python -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 25 14:11:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 10:11:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 181599] Review Request: gallery: web based photo album software In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605251411.k4PEBGMb022285@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gallery: web based photo album software https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=181599 ------- Additional Comments From jwb at redhat.com 2006-05-25 10:03 EST ------- 1. Yes, we still need to use the snapshot. The upstream source uses /usr/local/bin/perl (for example) which needs to be changed to /usr/bin/perl; this requires regeneration of the MANIFEST, which can only done with an SVN snapshot (makeManifest.pl requires the .svn dirs) 2. Yes, I've changed it to svn vs cvs. 3. Fixed 4. Fixed (BuildReq: subversion added) - build will not hit the network - I build the -15 package successfully on an isolated system with no network cable plugged in. 5. Creating the tarball is a four step process: - svn checkout https://svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/gallery/branches/BRANCH_2_1/gallery2 gallery2 - svn checkout https://svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/gallery/trunk/gallery2 gallery2-trunk - cp gallery2-trunk/lib/tools/bin/makeManifest.pl gallery2/lib/tools/bin/ - tar zcvf gallery-2.1.svn.tar.gz gallery2 6. Will add this file a bit later, working on the other issues right now. 7. The %find_lang macro in %install is causing a build failure: + /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/find-lang.sh /var/tmp/gallery2-2.1-0.15svn20060524-root-jwb gallery2 No translations found for gallery2 in /var/tmp/gallery2-2.1-0.15svn20060524-root-jwb error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.57785 (%install) Any suggestions? 8. - htaccess files - these have to be where they are, as gallery2 rewrites them via the admin web interface. We can't move them into the gallery2.conf in httpd/conf.d/ - non-executable-scripts fixed - Capitalization fixed. New files: SPEC: http://www.berningeronline.net/gallery2.spec SRPM: http://www.berningeronline.net/gallery2-2.1-0.16cvs20060524.src.rpm Please note the SRPM above will not rebuild - I need assistance with the %find_lang macro. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 25 15:16:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 11:16:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189611] Review Request: milter-regex regular expression based sendmail milter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605251516.k4PFGIpa026237@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: milter-regex regular expression based sendmail milter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189611 orion at cora.nwra.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From orion at cora.nwra.com 2006-05-25 11:08 EST ------- APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 25 15:38:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 11:38:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188574] Review Request: rss-glx -- Really Slick Screensavers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605251538.k4PFcBTh027472@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rss-glx -- Really Slick Screensavers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188574 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-05-25 11:30 EST ------- I note that neither xscreensaver-extras nor xscreensaver-gl-extras installs any of the hacks in /usr/bin. Perhaps would be a good idea for this package to follow that example, not only due to the KDE issue but to maintain consistency. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 25 15:39:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 11:39:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192490] Review Request: python-ogg - A Python wrapper for the Ogg libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605251539.k4PFdlPt027748@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-ogg - A Python wrapper for the Ogg libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192490 gauret at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From gauret at free.fr 2006-05-25 11:32 EST ------- Review for release 2: * RPM name is OK * Source pyogg-1.3.tar.gz is the same as upstream * Builds fine in mock * rpmlint of python-ogg looks OK * rpmlint of python-ogg-devel looks OK * File list of python-ogg looks OK * File list of python-ogg-devel looks OK * Works fine APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 25 15:41:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 11:41:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192491] Review Request: python-vorbis - A Python wrapper for the Ogg Vorbis audio libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605251541.k4PFfW8w028035@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-vorbis - A Python wrapper for the Ogg Vorbis audio libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192491 gauret at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From gauret at free.fr 2006-05-25 11:33 EST ------- Review for release 2: * RPM name is OK * Source pyvorbis-1.3.tar.gz is the same as upstream * Builds fine in mock * rpmlint looks OK * File list looks OK * Works fine APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 25 16:13:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 12:13:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189088] Review Request: knemo Network monitor applet. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605251613.k4PGDOAo030375@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: knemo Network monitor applet. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189088 gauret at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778, 177841 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From gauret at free.fr 2006-05-25 12:05 EST ------- Review for release 3: * RPM name is OK * Source knemo-0.4.0.tar.bz2 is the same as upstream * Builds fine in mock * rpmlint looks OK * File list looks OK * Works fine APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 25 16:30:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 12:30:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189088] Review Request: knemo Network monitor applet. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605251630.k4PGUFOD031955@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: knemo Network monitor applet. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189088 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rdieter at math.unl.edu ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-05-25 12:22 EST ------- A couple of suggestions: 1) Since configure includes: checking for ifconfig... /sbin/ifconfig checking for iwconfig... /sbin/iwconfig You'd best add: # /sbin/iwconfig BuildRequires: wireless-tools # /sbin/ifconfig BuildRequires: net-tools 2. per the README: IMPORTANT: KNemo is not an executable but an KDED service. Therefore it has to be started using Control Center/KDE Components/Service Manager. As such, this pkg probably ought to Requires: kdebase 3. .desktop files The categories are already properly set, the only one you should add is --add-category=X-Fedora (else it might accidentally show up in Gnome's menus somewhere). 4. unowned %{_datadir}/apps/knemo, in %files, change %{_datadir}/apps/knemo/eventsrc to %{_datadir}/apps/knemo -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 25 16:13:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 12:13:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 169703] Review Request: pari - Number Theory-oriented Computer Algebra System In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605251613.k4PGDSjl030385@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pari - Number Theory-oriented Computer Algebra System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=169703 orion at cora.nwra.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|gdk at redhat.com |orion at cora.nwra.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From orion at cora.nwra.com 2006-05-25 12:05 EST ------- Good: - md5sums match - -devel requires versioned package - calls ldconfig - owns all files Minor: - Don't need BR gzip and perl - Why the Requires: gzip? - I would clean up some of the commented out stuff from the spec file, and the unneeded Patch. - rpmlint: W: pari-gp devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/pari/examples/extgcd.c this should probably be in the -devel package. - The last sentence of the %description is odd, since this package contains the library: PARI is also available as a C library to allow for faster computations. perhaps: PARI includes a C library to allow for faster computations for other applications. - Do we even care about pari.cfg? - why not ship xgp and gpflog? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 25 17:16:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 13:16:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189088] Review Request: knemo Network monitor applet. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605251716.k4PHGltO003107@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: knemo Network monitor applet. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189088 gauret at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163779 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From gauret at free.fr 2006-05-25 13:09 EST ------- (In reply to comment #14) > You'd best add: > # /sbin/iwconfig > BuildRequires: wireless-tools > # /sbin/ifconfig > BuildRequires: net-tools Agreed, the detection is done at compile time, not run time. Thus if you don't have them during the build, you won't be able to use them afterwards, even if knemo only calls them and parses the output. > As such, this pkg probably ought to > Requires: kdebase > The categories are already properly set, the only one you should add is > --add-category=X-Fedora Agreed. > 4. unowned %{_datadir}/apps/knemo I can't believe I missed that... Thanks Rex. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 25 17:34:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 13:34:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 181599] Review Request: gallery: web based photo album software In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605251734.k4PHYqJ0004053@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gallery: web based photo album software https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=181599 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-05-25 13:27 EST ------- ok. So, sounds like we are down to just the find_lang issues... The SRPM link in comment #46 is wrong... s/cvs/svn/ to get the valid link. find_lang looks for .mo files under the buildroot. It needs to know the $name.mo though to find them. Looks like the .mo files here are not named 'gallery2.mo'. Do a 'rpm -qlip *.noarch.rpm | grep .mo$ ' on the noarch rpms and you will see the .mo files. For the main package they are named 'gallery-install' 'modules_core' 'gallery2_upgrade'. So, I think you need 3 find_lang calls with each of those names. You also need to add to the files section: %files -f gallery-install.lang modules_core.lang gallery2_upgrade.lang All the modules and themes have their own .mo files, named: modules_$modulename or themes_$themename. So, they will have to be added to each subpackage's %files section... Does that make sense? Can you try adding that and see if you can get it working? I can try testing it here later tonight as well... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 25 17:47:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 13:47:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 185951] Review Request: amsn : msn messenger clone In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605251747.k4PHluB2004719@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: amsn : msn messenger clone https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=185951 ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2006-05-25 13:40 EST ------- I took a look at Amsn_BWidget to see what the changes are, and they don't seem very major to me. Hopefully upstream will agree and accept the changes. * Some documentation and image updates * improvements to the font selector to allow disabling the font color, size, and style * Some minor widget layout changes (reordering buttons, changing borderwidths) * New methods in the scrolledwidget for resizing * A handful of modified RCS strings on otherwise-unmodified files But I don't understand the reasoning behind a couple of the changes: * Removal of -background setting in scrolledwindow * The extra rename of ::$path:cmd in widget.tcl A possible alternative is to include only the modified files in Amsn_BWidget, and rely on the FE bwidget package for all of the rest: # Pull the base BWidget from FE package require BWidget # Pull in only the modified files from Amsn package require Amsn_BWidget This might take some work to do right (hacking the pkgIndex.tcl file, probably), but should allow you to use modified BWidget files without including the entire BWidget library in amsn. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 25 18:01:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 14:01:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 181599] Review Request: gallery: web based photo album software In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605251801.k4PI1kRl005221@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gallery: web based photo album software https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=181599 ------- Additional Comments From jwb at redhat.com 2006-05-25 13:54 EST ------- It makes sense, but I'm still getting the same error message. SPEC snippet: %find_lang themes_siriux Error: + /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/find-lang.sh /var/tmp/gallery2-2.1-0.16svn20060524-root-jwb themes_siriux No translations found for themes_siriux in /var/tmp/gallery2-2.1-0.16svn20060524-root-jwb error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.42330 (%install) But there *are* themes_siriux.mo files in the buildroot... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 25 18:11:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 14:11:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191088] Review Request: mlsutils In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605251811.k4PIBnha005835@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mlsutils https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191088 dwalsh at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG ------- Additional Comments From dwalsh at redhat.com 2006-05-25 14:04 EST ------- Dropping this request as I have renamed the package devallocator and will resubmit request. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 25 18:12:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 14:12:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193054] Review Request: pyogg In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605251812.k4PICYxM005942@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyogg https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193054 bdpepple at ameritech.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at ameritech.net 2006-05-25 14:04 EST ------- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 192490 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 25 18:12:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 14:12:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193154] New: Review Request: asymptote - Descriptive vector graphics language Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193154 Summary: Review Request: asymptote - Descriptive vector graphics language Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: jpo at di.uminho.pt QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://gsd.di.uminho.pt/jpo/software/fedora/asymptote.spec SRPM URL: http://gsd.di.uminho.pt/jpo/software/fedora/asymptote-1.06-1.src.rpm Description: Asymptote is a powerful descriptive vector graphics language for technical drawings, inspired by MetaPost but with an improved C++-like syntax. Asymptote provides for figures the same high-quality level of typesetting that LaTeX does for scientific text. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 25 18:13:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 14:13:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192490] Review Request: python-ogg - A Python wrapper for the Ogg libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605251813.k4PID6No006036@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-ogg - A Python wrapper for the Ogg libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192490 bdpepple at ameritech.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |gilles.gagniard at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at ameritech.net 2006-05-25 14:05 EST ------- *** Bug 193054 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 25 18:16:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 14:16:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193155] New: Review Request:
Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193155 Summary: Review Request:
Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: dwalsh at redhat.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: ftp://people.redhat.com/dwalsh/SELinux/devallocator.spec SRPM URL: ftp://people.redhat.com/dwalsh/SELinux/devallocator-0.5.4-1.src.rpm Description: This package contains the devallocator tool which is required for MLS Conformance. dev_allocator is required to replace hal/udev. Removable Devices need to be manually allocated by users in an MLS environment. This tool allows for the auditing of these events. Automatic allocation of devices is not allowed in an LSPP environment. This package replaces the previous request for mlsutils. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 25 18:16:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 14:16:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193156] New: Review Request: devallocator Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193156 Summary: Review Request: devallocator Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: dwalsh at redhat.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: ftp://people.redhat.com/dwalsh/SELinux/devallocator.spec SRPM URL: ftp://people.redhat.com/dwalsh/SELinux/devallocator-0.5.4-1.src.rpm Description: This package contains the devallocator tool which is required for MLS Conformance. dev_allocator is required to replace hal/udev. Removable Devices need to be manually allocated by users in an MLS environment. This tool allows for the auditing of these events. Automatic allocation of devices is not allowed in an LSPP environment. This package replaces the previous request for mlsutils. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 25 18:19:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 14:19:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193157] New: Review Request: system-config-selinux Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193157 Summary: Review Request: system-config-selinux Product: Fedora Core Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: notting at redhat.com ReportedBy: dwalsh at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: ftp://people.redhat.com/dwalsh/SELinux/system-config-selinux.spec SRPM URL: ftp://people.redhat.com/dwalsh/SELinux/system-config-selinux-0.0.1-1.src.rpm Description: system-config-selinux is a gui front end to the semanage tool. This tool allows you to configure all parts of the SELinux environment. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 25 18:24:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 14:24:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193157] Review Request: system-config-selinux In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605251824.k4PIOHE7007146@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: system-config-selinux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193157 jkeating at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|notting at redhat.com |jkeating at redhat.com OtherBugsDependingO|188265 |188267 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 25 18:37:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 14:37:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193155] Review Request:
In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605251837.k4PIbMwP008311@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193155 bdpepple at ameritech.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request:
|package name here> Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at ameritech.net 2006-05-25 14:29 EST ------- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 193156 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 25 18:37:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 14:37:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193156] Review Request: devallocator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605251837.k4PIbOnF008330@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: devallocator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193156 ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at ameritech.net 2006-05-25 14:29 EST ------- *** Bug 193155 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 25 18:38:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 14:38:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 186327] Review Request: tcltls In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605251838.k4PIcrj3008552@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tcltls https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=186327 wart at kobold.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |wart at kobold.org ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2006-05-25 14:31 EST ------- Assigning this to myself now that I've been granted sponsor status. Have you filled out the CLA in the accounts system yet? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 25 18:39:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 14:39:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 181599] Review Request: gallery: web based photo album software In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605251839.k4PIdpKX008748@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gallery: web based photo album software https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=181599 ------- Additional Comments From enrico.scholz at informatik.tu-chemnitz.de 2006-05-25 14:32 EST ------- fwiw, the multiple subpackages can be created shorter by a macro like --- %global spc_nil %nil %global spc %spc_nil %spc_nil %global true 1 %trace %{?true:%global pkgdcl(n:N:d:R:) \ %package %%{-n*} \ Summary: %%{-N*} module for Gallery 2 \ Group: Applications/Publishing \ Requires: gallery2 = %%{version}-%%{release} \ %%{?-R:Requires:%%{-R*}} \ \ %description %%{-n*} \ Gallery 2 module - %%{-d*} \ \ %files %%{-n*} \ %defattr(-,root,root,-) \ %{installprefix}/gallery2/modules/%%{-n*} \ } --- which can be used like --- %{pkgdcl -n albumselect -N Albumselect \ -d Jump%{spc}directly%{spc}to%{spc}any%{spc}album%{spc}using%{spc}a%{spc}select%{spc}box%{spc}or%{spc}tree%{spc}view} %{pkgdcl -n netpbm - N NetPBM \ -d NetPBM%{spc}Graphics%{spc}Toolkit -R netpbm>=9.0} ... --- This creates * the '%package ...' + related headers * the '%description' * the '%files' Generating spaces is a little bit tricky; for description you can use perhaps '%*' too. It's up to the exercise of the reader to write such a modified macro ;) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 25 18:43:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 14:43:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 182064] Review Request: facter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605251843.k4PIhavp009273@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: facter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=182064 dlutter at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tcallawa at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From dlutter at redhat.com 2006-05-25 14:36 EST ------- Thanks for reviewing and approving hte package. I will hold off on importing it until the Ruby packaging guidelines (http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Ruby) have been approved, or spot says it's ok. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 25 18:49:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 14:49:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193157] Review Request: system-config-selinux In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605251849.k4PInAw0010044@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: system-config-selinux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193157 ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-05-25 14:41 EST ------- Needswork: - Hardset Requires, can't you just let rpm figure that out in the build, it almost always gets it right. - #Replace the files line with the one commented out when translations are done %files #%files The two lines are the same.... - desktop file present but not installed correctly. Check out http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#desktop for the desktop stuff. rpmlint is silent on the srpm and the noarch.rpm, so thats good. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 25 18:53:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 14:53:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192575] Review Request: perl-Pipeline In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605251853.k4PIrutG010574@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Pipeline https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192575 ------- Additional Comments From steve at silug.org 2006-05-25 14:46 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > Some notes from the test suite: > > t/11async................Use of uninitialized value in numeric eq (==) at > /builddir/build/BUILD/Pipeline-3.12/blib/lib/Pipeline/Store.pm line 33 during > global destruction. > Unbalanced string table refcount: (1) for "debug" during global destruction. > Unbalanced string table refcount: (1) for "dispatcher" during global destruction. > Unbalanced string table refcount: (1) for "parent" during global destruction. > Unbalanced string table refcount: (1) for "store" during global destruction. > Scalars leaked: 1 > ok > > Not sure what's up here. I opened a ticket for this. http://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=19481 > t/98compile..............skipped > all skipped: - do not have File::Find::Rule installed > t/99pod..................skipped > all skipped: - do not have Find::File::Rule or Pod::Checker installed [...] > Acme::Colour isn't in extras, but the others are and adding them as BR:s gives > better coverage: Pod::Checker is a core module, so I just needed to add File::Find::Rule. Fixed in -2, in CVS. > t/03colour...............skipped > all skipped: - do not have Acme::Colour installed [...] > I don't think there's any need to package Acme::Colour just for this; it's kind > of, uhh, limited in scope anyway. Agreed. Anything in the Acme namespace is probably of dubious value. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 25 19:01:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 15:01:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193161] New: Review Request: ruby-posgtres Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193161 Summary: Review Request: ruby-posgtres Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: dlutter at redhat.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/dlutter/yum/spec/ruby-postgres.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/dlutter/yum/SRPMS/ruby-postgres-0.7.1-1.src.rpm Description: Database driver to access PostgreSQL databases from Ruby. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 25 19:01:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 15:01:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 181599] Review Request: gallery: web based photo album software In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605251901.k4PJ1tnP011137@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gallery: web based photo album software https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=181599 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-05-25 14:54 EST ------- Thanks to rdieter on the irc channel for looking into the find_lang issue... It looks like find_lang only finds .mo files that are properly installed under /usr/share/locale//.mo How hard would it be to patch gallery to install those .mo's there and use them correctly there? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 25 19:03:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 15:03:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193161] Review Request: ruby-postgres In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605251903.k4PJ3Epe011206@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-postgres https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193161 dlutter at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: ruby- |Review Request: ruby- |posgtres |postgres -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 25 19:08:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 15:08:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 181599] Review Request: gallery: web based photo album software In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605251908.k4PJ8pvm011530@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gallery: web based photo album software https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=181599 ------- Additional Comments From jwb at redhat.com 2006-05-25 15:01 EST ------- Almost impossible, as each individual theme / module would have to be patched; the Gallery codebase is deliberately designed to be completely self-contained within it's install root. Although technically possible, the patch to do this may very well end up half as large as Gallery itself, if not larger. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 25 19:49:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 15:49:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 185951] Review Request: amsn : msn messenger clone In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605251949.k4PJnUEg014287@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: amsn : msn messenger clone https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=185951 wart at kobold.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |wart at kobold.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 25 20:10:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 16:10:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 169703] Review Request: pari - Number Theory-oriented Computer Algebra System In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605252010.k4PKAf98015186@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pari - Number Theory-oriented Computer Algebra System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=169703 ------- Additional Comments From orion at cora.nwra.com 2006-05-25 16:03 EST ------- Looks like: # we move pari.cfg to the docdir rm -fr $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_libdir}/pari needs to be: # we move pari.cfg to the docdir rm -fr $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_prefix}/lib/pari As it is installed there even on x86_64. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 25 20:29:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 16:29:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 181599] Review Request: gallery: web based photo album software In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605252029.k4PKTsOO016044@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gallery: web based photo album software https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=181599 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-05-25 16:22 EST ------- In answer to comment #51: I was afraid of that. I looked and saw that the debian package had it's locale files in /usr/share/locale, but then I saw it was 1.5.x and they had contributed their own locale files, so that doesn't help us at all. ;( Can you generate a new spec/src.rpm without find_lang? (ie, back to just packaging them as regular files). I do see several other packages having private lang files, but it's unclear if those are packaging bugs or not (mailman, PyXML, vim), in any case thats the only alternative I see here. If you can put up a new spec/src.rpm I will try and do some functionality testing tonight and go over anything else thats outstanding. Hopefully we can get this approved soon... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 25 21:09:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 17:09:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 181599] Review Request: gallery: web based photo album software In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605252109.k4PL9AUW018654@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gallery: web based photo album software https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=181599 ------- Additional Comments From jwb at redhat.com 2006-05-25 17:01 EST ------- Done. New package: SPEC: http://www.berningeronline.net/gallery2.spec SRPM: http://www.berningeronline.net/gallery2-2.1-0.17svn20060524.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 25 21:43:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 17:43:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 169703] Review Request: pari - Number Theory-oriented Computer Algebra System In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605252143.k4PLhXGC021394@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pari - Number Theory-oriented Computer Algebra System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=169703 ------- Additional Comments From gemi at bluewin.ch 2006-05-25 17:35 EST ------- (In reply to comment #25) > - Don't need BR gzip and perl Ok. > - Why the Requires: gzip? I fact, gp can use gzip to load gzipped files, it seems. I moved the Requires to the gp subpackage. > - I would clean up some of the commented out stuff from the spec file, and the > unneeded Patch. Ok. > - rpmlint: > W: pari-gp devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/pari/examples/extgcd.c > this should probably be in the -devel package. The C example is in fact an example for a dynamic module loadable by gp. So it effectively belong to gp and not to devel. > > - The last sentence of the %description is odd, since this package contains the > library: I replace the last sentence by: "This package contains the shared libraries. The interactive calculator PARI/GP is in package %{name}-gp." > - Do we even care about pari.cfg? users.dvi mentions it, so I thought I leave it in the docdir. > - why not ship xgp and gpflog? I would not ship xgp. I just added a .desktop file to start gp in a terminal. I leave gpflog in. (In reply to comment #26) > Looks like: > > # we move pari.cfg to the docdir > rm -fr $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_libdir}/pari > > needs to be: > > # we move pari.cfg to the docdir > rm -fr $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_prefix}/lib/pari Ok. http://math.ifi.unizh.ch/fedora/5/i386/SRPMS.gemi/pari-2.3.0-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 25 21:53:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 17:53:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193054] Review Request: pyogg In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605252153.k4PLrZD9022415@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyogg https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193054 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 25 21:53:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 17:53:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193155] Review Request:
In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605252153.k4PLrUnM022411@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193155 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 25 22:00:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 18:00:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193187] New: Review Request: pcsc-lite & ccid Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193187 Summary: Review Request: pcsc-lite & ccid Product: Fedora Core Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: notting at redhat.com ReportedBy: rrelyea at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://directory.fedora.redhat.com/built/rpm_review/rrelyea/pcsc-lite.spec SRPM URL: http://directory.fedora.redhat.com/built/rpm_review/rrelyea/pcsc-lite-1.3.1-1.src.rpm Description: The purpose of PC/SC Lite is to provide a Windows(R) SCard interface in a very small form factor for communicating to smartcards and readers. PC/SC Lite uses the same winscard API as used under Windows(R). This package includes the PC/SC Lite daemon, a resource manager that coordinates communications with smart card readers and smart cards that are connected to the system, as well as other command line tools. This package is moving from Extras to Core. Changes from the extra version include: remove dependency on graphviz (verify that rebuild worked without it). removed %(_dist) flag moved libpcsclite.so from devel to libs. make %config %config(noreplace) to make rpmlint happy (oh and it's the right thing to do;). This package requires the ccid package to run, but not build and they should be reviewed together. Spec URL: http://directory.fedora.redhat.com/built/rpm_review/rrelyea/ccid.spec SRPM URL: http://directory.fedora.redhat.com/built/rpm_review/rrelyea/pcsc-lite-1.0.1-1.src.rpm Description: Generic USB CCID (Chip/Smart Card Interface Devices) driver. This package is also moving from extras to core. The only change to this file was removing the %(_dist) macro. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 25 22:02:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 18:02:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193187] Review Request: pcsc-lite & ccid In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605252202.k4PM2vZ2022767@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pcsc-lite & ccid https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193187 ------- Additional Comments From rrelyea at redhat.com 2006-05-25 17:55 EST ------- The SRPM URL for ccid should have been: SRPM URL: http://directory.fedora.redhat.com/built/rpm_review/rrelyea/ccid-1.0.1-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 25 22:18:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 18:18:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193187] Review Request: pcsc-lite & ccid In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605252218.k4PMIDc2023347@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pcsc-lite & ccid https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193187 ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-05-25 18:10 EST ------- Since it is already in Extras, what is the purpose of bringing it into Core? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 25 22:22:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 18:22:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193191] New: Review Request: rename of notify-daemon to notification-daemon Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193191 Summary: Review Request: rename of notify-daemon to notification- daemon Product: Fedora Core Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: notting at redhat.com ReportedBy: johnp at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/johnp/files/notification-daemon/notification-daemon.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/johnp/files/notification-daemon/notification-daemon-0.3.5-1.src.rpm Description: This is a rename to match upstream's rename of the notification-daemon package -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 25 22:26:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 18:26:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193191] Review Request: rename of notify-daemon to notification-daemon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605252226.k4PMQAN0023568@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rename of notify-daemon to notification-daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193191 jkeating at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|notting at redhat.com |jkeating at redhat.com OtherBugsDependingO|188265 |188267 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 25 22:56:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 18:56:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193154] Review Request: asymptote - Descriptive vector graphics language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605252256.k4PMuSap024785@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: asymptote - Descriptive vector graphics language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193154 ------- Additional Comments From gemi at bluewin.ch 2006-05-25 18:48 EST ------- Here a few things from first sight: * Why do you copy things into the docdir instead of just using %doc? Also the doc directory is not owned. A proposal for what I did instead of the patch: add the option docdir=doc-install to configure, then you can simply use %doc doc-install/* in the files section: %doc LICENSE README TODO BUGS %doc doc-install/* %doc doc/asymptote.pdf * The package must own directory %{_datadir}/%{name} * The package must own directory %{texpkgdir} * Possibly add a file asy-init.el to /usr/share/emacs/site-lisp/site-start.d: (autoload 'asy-mode "asy-mode.el" "Asymptote major mode." t) (add-to-list 'auto-mode-alist '("\\.asy$" . asy-mode)) and something analogous for xemacs. Output of rpmlint: W: asymptote symlink-should-be-relative /usr/share/emacs/site-lisp/asy-mode.el /usr/share/asymptote/asy-mode.el W: asymptote symlink-should-be-relative /usr/share/vim/vim64/syntax/asy.vim /usr/share/asymptote/asy.vim W: asymptote symlink-should-be-relative /usr/share/vim/vim70/syntax/asy.vim /usr/share/asymptote/asy.vim W: asymptote symlink-should-be-relative /usr/share/vim/vim63/syntax/asy.vim /usr/share/asymptote/asy.vim W: asymptote symlink-should-be-relative /usr/share/xemacs/site-packages/lisp/asy-mode.el /usr/share/asymptote/asy-mode.el W: asymptote dangerous-command-in-%trigger ln W: asymptote dangerous-command-in-%trigger ln W: asymptote dangerous-command-in-%trigger rm W: asymptote dangerous-command-in-%trigger rm W: asymptote percent-in-%trigger W: asymptote dangerous-command-in-%trigger ln W: asymptote percent-in-%trigger W: asymptote dangerous-command-in-%trigger rm W: asymptote percent-in-%trigger W: asymptote dangerous-command-in-%trigger rm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 25 23:05:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 19:05:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 169703] Review Request: pari - Number Theory-oriented Computer Algebra System In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605252305.k4PN5fdE025147@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pari - Number Theory-oriented Computer Algebra System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=169703 orion at cora.nwra.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From orion at cora.nwra.com 2006-05-25 18:58 EST ------- - a revision bump would have been good. - Should "make dobench" be in %check? What about "make test-all" or "make test-kernel" or "make test-compat"? - Do you want to use GNU mp (Configure --with-mp)? Install guide says it is faster than the pari version. - Why -fomit-frame-pointer? Looks like it may be set automatically now. - export DLCFLAGS=-fPIC is unneeded. - Looks like -DGCC_INLINE is unneeded as well. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 25 23:36:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 19:36:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193187] Review Request: pcsc-lite & ccid In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605252336.k4PNajWJ026042@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pcsc-lite & ccid https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193187 ------- Additional Comments From rrelyea at redhat.com 2006-05-25 19:29 EST ------- They are needed for the smart card login support for RHEL5. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 25 23:38:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 19:38:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 169703] Review Request: pari - Number Theory-oriented Computer Algebra System In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605252338.k4PNcTgU026167@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pari - Number Theory-oriented Computer Algebra System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=169703 ------- Additional Comments From gemi at bluewin.ch 2006-05-25 19:30 EST ------- (In reply to comment #28) > - Should "make dobench" be in %check? What about "make test-all" or "make > test-kernel" or "make test-compat"? moved "make dobench" to %check > - Do you want to use GNU mp (Configure --with-mp)? Install guide says it is > faster than the pari version. Builds fine with gmp. Note that the library is called libpari-gmp now. > - Why -fomit-frame-pointer? Looks like it may be set automatically now. > - export DLCFLAGS=-fPIC is unneeded. > - Looks like -DGCC_INLINE is unneeded as well. Ok. The -fPIC in CFLAGS is still necessary. http://math.ifi.unizh.ch/fedora/5/i386/SRPMS.gemi/pari-2.3.0-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 25 23:41:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 19:41:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193191] Review Request: rename of notify-daemon to notification-daemon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605252341.k4PNfjLu026426@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rename of notify-daemon to notification-daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193191 ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at ameritech.net 2006-05-25 19:34 EST ------- Couple of items: 1. Fails to build in Mock. Looks like it is due to a missing BR on GConf2-devel. 2. The Requires on gtk2 & dbus are unnecessary, since the devel packages sonames will pull these in. 3. SOURCE should be a full URL. 4. You can probably pass the --disable-static flag to the configure macro, and not even build the static libs since your just removing them anyhow. 5. You should probably use the gconf scriptlets from the wiki. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/ScriptletSnippets#head-ff64cd482595764f672082d5a3b83e1fc22962e8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 26 00:01:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 20:01:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193187] Review Request: pcsc-lite & ccid In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605260001.k4Q01ROl027380@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pcsc-lite & ccid https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193187 kaboom at oobleck.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kaboom at oobleck.net ------- Additional Comments From kaboom at oobleck.net 2006-05-25 19:53 EST ------- It being needed for RHEL has nothing to do with whether it should be in Fedora Core or not, though.... Is there a plan to add smart card login support to Fedora also, or just to RHEL? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 26 00:07:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 20:07:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193187] Review Request: pcsc-lite & ccid In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605260007.k4Q07VfY027539@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pcsc-lite & ccid https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193187 ------- Additional Comments From rrelyea at redhat.com 2006-05-25 20:00 EST ------- Yes. You will see smart card login support in fedora before you see it in RHEL. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 26 00:38:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 20:38:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190939] Review Request: daap-sharp In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605260038.k4Q0c9Vv028338@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: daap-sharp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190939 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-05-25 20:30 EST ------- Sorry for the delay. Good: - rpmlint checks return: daap-sharp-0.3.3-3.src.rpm E: daap-sharp hardcoded-library-path in %{_prefix}/lib E: daap-sharp hardcoded-library-path in %{_prefix}/lib/%{name} daap-sharp-0.3.3-3.x86_64.rpm E: daap-sharp no-binary E: daap-sharp only-non-binary-in-usr-lib E: daap-sharp script-without-shellbang /usr/lib/daap-sharp/daap-sharp.dll.configdaap-sharp-debuginfo-0.3.3-3.x86_64.rpm daap-sharp-devel-0.3.3-3.x86_64.rpm W: daap-sharp-devel no-documentation All errors and warnings expected for mono packages. - package meets naming guidelines - package meets packaging guidelines - license (LGPL) OK, text in %doc, matches source - spec file legible, in am. english - source matches upstream - package compiles on devel (x86) - no missing BR - no unnecessary BR - no locales - not relocatable - owns all directories that it creates - no duplicate files - permissions ok - %clean ok - macro use consistent - code, not content - no need for -docs - nothing in %doc affects runtime - no need for .desktop file - devel package ok - no .la files - devel requires base package n-v-r Not a must, but why not: - include AUTHORS, ChangeLog, README, etc, in %doc? - include the samples in %doc? APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 26 01:55:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 21:55:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 181599] Review Request: gallery: web based photo album software In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605260155.k4Q1tYoW031146@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gallery: web based photo album software https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=181599 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-05-25 21:47 EST ------- I can't seem to get it to work here. (possibly related to the /srv/gallery2 path? ) Either installing multi-site or single site, it gives me the same error in step #8: Error (ERROR_PLATFORM_FAILURE) : /srv/gallery2/locks/0/1/1 * in modules/core/classes/FlockLockSystem.class at line 77 (GalleryCoreApi::error) * in modules/core/classes/GalleryLockSystem.class at line 101 (FlockLockSystem::_acquireLock) * in modules/core/classes/helpers/GalleryLockHelper_simple.class at line 66 (GalleryLockSystem::acquireReadLock) * in modules/core/classes/GalleryCoreApi.class at line 2263 (GalleryLockHelper_simple::acquireReadLock) * in modules/core/classes/helpers/GalleryPermissionHelper_advanced.class at line 1154 (GalleryCoreApi::acquireReadLock) * in modules/core/classes/helpers/GalleryPermissionHelper_advanced.class at line 247 (GalleryPermissionHelper_advanced::_getAccessListCompacterLock) * in modules/core/classes/helpers/GalleryPermissionHelper_advanced.class at line 78 (GalleryPermissionHelper_advanced::_changePermission) * in modules/core/classes/GalleryCoreApi.class at line 732 (GalleryPermissionHelper_advanced::addGroupPermission) * in modules/core/CoreModuleExtras.inc at line 2486 (GalleryCoreApi::addGroupPermission) * in ??? at line 0 (CoreModuleExtras::_createRootAlbumItem) * in modules/core/CoreModuleExtras.inc at line 265 * in modules/core/module.inc at line 487 (CoreModuleExtras::upgrade) * in modules/core/classes/GalleryModule.class at line 157 (CoreModule::upgrade) * in install/steps/InstallCoreModuleStep.class at line 131 (GalleryModule::installOrUpgrade) * in install/index.php at line 201 (InstallCoreModuleStep::processRequest) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 26 03:24:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 23:24:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191523] Review Request: perl-XML-Stream In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605260324.k4Q3OBrZ004747@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-XML-Stream https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191523 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-05-25 23:16 EST ------- Note: test suites should not talk to the network as you don't know that the build hosts aren't completely firewalled. In any case, the tests don't work at all for me in mock, probably due to not having a resolver configuration: PERL_DL_NONLAZY=1 /usr/bin/perl "-MExtUtils::Command::MM" "-e" "test_harness(0, 'blib/lib', 'blib/arch')" t/*.t t/buildxml......Cannot resolve compute20.math.uh.edu: at lib/XML/Stream.pm line 406. # Looks like you planned 56 tests but only ran 1. # Looks like your test died just after 1. My recommendation is to just comment out the "make test" line in %check before you check in. I'll assume that's been done for the purposes of this review. Upstream includes a copy of the LGPL, which you must include in the package. I would recommend including the others as well; just do perldoc perlgpl > LICENSE.GPL perldoc perlartistic > LICENSE.Artistic and then include those as %doc along with the included LICENSE.LGPL. I'd also suggest including any correspondence with the author you have which might clarify the license issie. No need to BuildRequires: perl, but not a blocker. Review: * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * dist tag is present. O license field matches the actual license (please include the author's "clarification" of the license issue). X license is open source-compatible. License text provided but not included. * source files match upstream: ae09400fac17eaea4c9b12283db06881 XML-Stream-1.22.tar.gz ae09400fac17eaea4c9b12283db06881 XML-Stream-1.22.tar.gz-srpm * latest version is being packaged. O BuildRequires are proper. (perl BR is superfluous.) * package builds in mock (development, x86_64), with test suite disabled. * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: perl(XML::Stream) = 1.22 perl(XML::Stream::Namespace) = 1.22 perl(XML::Stream::Node) = 1.22 perl(XML::Stream::Parser) = 1.22 perl(XML::Stream::Parser::DTD) = 1.22 perl(XML::Stream::Tree) = 1.22 perl(XML::Stream::XPath) = 1.22 perl(XML::Stream::XPath::AllOp) perl(XML::Stream::XPath::AndOp) perl(XML::Stream::XPath::AttributeOp) perl(XML::Stream::XPath::ContextOp) perl(XML::Stream::XPath::EqualOp) perl(XML::Stream::XPath::FunctionOp) perl(XML::Stream::XPath::NodeOp) perl(XML::Stream::XPath::NotEqualOp) perl(XML::Stream::XPath::Op) = 1.22 perl(XML::Stream::XPath::OrOp) perl(XML::Stream::XPath::PositionOp) perl(XML::Stream::XPath::Query) = 1.22 perl(XML::Stream::XPath::Value) = 1.22 perl-XML-Stream = 1.22-3.fc6 - perl >= 0:5.006_001 perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8) perl(Authen::SASL) perl(Carp) perl(Encode) perl(Exporter) perl(FileHandle) perl(IO::Select) perl(IO::Socket) perl(MIME::Base64) perl(POSIX) perl(Sys::Hostname) perl(XML::Stream::Namespace) perl(XML::Stream::Parser) perl(XML::Stream::XPath) perl(XML::Stream::XPath::Op) perl(XML::Stream::XPath::Query) perl(XML::Stream::XPath::Value) perl(strict) perl(utf8) perl(vars) * no shared libraries are present. * package is not relocatable. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * %clean is present. * %check is present but necessarily disabled. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no libtool .la droppings. * not a GUI app. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 26 03:25:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 23:25:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177583] Review Request: zaptel-kmod In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605260325.k4Q3Pj4S004891@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: zaptel-kmod https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177583 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-05-25 23:18 EST ------- So, is the kernel module setup finalized in fedora extras now? Or still in flux? kmodtool 0.10.10 is out if you want to update to that. Should there be a kmodtool package that the other kernel packages BuildRequire: instead of including it in each kernel module package? I was able to build this package in mock, but only for the exact kernel on my development machine and with just it's exact arch. Can mock be used to build kmod packages? If so, how should it be called? I'd be happy to review this package provided the specs are finalized now... (or perhaps one of the folks that wrote the kmodtool would be interested in making this a test case...) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 26 03:53:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 23:53:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191523] Review Request: perl-XML-Stream In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605260353.k4Q3r1bV006291@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-XML-Stream https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191523 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-05-25 23:45 EST ------- Updated as requested. Spec URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-XML-Stream.spec SRPM URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-XML-Stream-1.22-4.fc5.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 26 04:03:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 May 2006 00:03:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191540] Review Request: perl-Net-XMPP In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605260403.k4Q43prt006437@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-XMPP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191540 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-05-25 23:56 EST ------- Included licensing correspondance, as well as the text of all three licenses. Looked at the test suite -- seems to do a good job of not failing on network blockage; can filter those out if needs be. Updated: Spec URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-Net-XMPP.spec SRPM URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-Net-XMPP-1.0-4.fc5.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 26 04:04:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 May 2006 00:04:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193210] New: Review Request: htmldoc - Convert HTML source files into HTML, PostScript, or PDF Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193210 Summary: Review Request: htmldoc - Convert HTML source files into HTML, PostScript, or PDF Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: adam at spicenitz.org QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.spicenitz.org/fedora/htmldoc.spec SRPM URL: http://www.spicenitz.org/fedora/htmldoc-1.8.26-1.src.rpm Description: HTMLDOC converts HTML source files into indexed HTML, PostScript, or Portable Document Format (PDF) files that can be viewed online or printed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 26 04:06:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 May 2006 00:06:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193210] Review Request: htmldoc - Convert HTML source files into HTML, PostScript, or PDF In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605260406.k4Q46SwH006536@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: htmldoc - Convert HTML source files into HTML, PostScript, or PDF https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193210 adam at spicenitz.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From adam at spicenitz.org 2006-05-25 23:58 EST ------- Sorry, forgot to mention that this is my first package, and I am looking for a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 26 04:07:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 May 2006 00:07:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191545] Review Request: perl-Net-Jabber In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605260407.k4Q47vJm006641@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-Jabber https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191545 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-05-26 00:00 EST ------- Included licensing correspondance, as well as the text of all three licenses. Looked at the test suite -- seems to do a good job of not failing on network blockage; can filter those out if needs be. Spec URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-Net-Jabber.spec SRPM URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-Net-Jabber-2.0-4.fc5.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 26 04:10:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 May 2006 00:10:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193109] Review Request: plotmm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605260410.k4Q4A8p4006692@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: plotmm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193109 rc040203 at freenet.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: plotmm |Review Request: plotmm AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |rc040203 at freenet.de OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2006-05-26 00:02 EST ------- NEEDSWORK: Blockers: - The package ships example applications in %{_bindir} /usr/bin/simple /usr/bin/curve To me this seems questionable twice: 1. These application names are too general and likely to conflict with other packages. 2. Installing example applications to %{_bindir} isn't necessarily a wise decision. Wrt. 2, I'd propose to move these examples out of the base package into an *-examples package or to make them part of the *-devel package. Wrt. 1., I'd propose to move these applications out of %{_bindir} and to install them into a different location (e.g. %{_libdir}/plotmm/examples), or to rename them into something less likely to conflict (e.g. plotmm-{simple|curve}). Minor: - The sources contain devel docs (in doc/html/), but they are not being packages. I'd propose to ship these docs as part of the *-devel package - Rpmlint complaints: # rpmlint plotmm-0.1.2-1.i386.rpm W: plotmm summary-ended-with-dot GTKmm plot widget for scientific applications. E: plotmm description-line-too-long It contains widgets which are primarily useful for technical and scientifical purposes. E: plotmm zero-length /usr/share/doc/plotmm-0.1.2/NEWS E: plotmm zero-length /usr/share/doc/plotmm-0.1.2/INSTALL # rpmlint plotmm-devel-0.1.2-1.i386.rpm W: plotmm-devel summary-ended-with-dot Headers for developing programs that will use plotmm. E: plotmm-devel description-line-too-long This package contains the headers that programmers will need to develop applications which will use plotmm. W: plotmm-devel no-documentation General issue: You are using an Alias-name instead of your real name in %changelog. I am opposed to this practice. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 26 04:28:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 May 2006 00:28:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192577] Review Request: perl-OpenFrame In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605260428.k4Q4SfgJ007127@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-OpenFrame https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192577 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-05-26 00:21 EST ------- Only one of the files (lib/OpenFrame/Argument/Blob.pm) seems to have a statement of the license. I don't think that's enough to suggest the license for the entire package. I wonder about the need for these: Requires: perl(File::Type) >= 0.01 Requires: perl(HTTP::Request) >= 0.01 Requires: perl(IO::Null) >= 0.01 The versions are so low that they seem to have been put in as placeholders. RPM should figure out all of these on its own. (It doesn't find HTTP::Request but it does find other modules, all provided by perl-libwww-perl.) Some issues from the test suite: t/02http_request....[OpenFrame::Segment::HTTP::Response::OpenFrame::Segment::HTTP::Response::dispatch] no response available at /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/Pipeline/Dispatch.pm line 74 ok t/98compile.........skipped all skipped: - do not have File::Find::Rule installed I'm not sure if the first is a mock artifact or a problem with the test suite. The second is fixed up with the obvious BR:. Review: * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * dist tag is present. ? license field matches the actual license. ? license is open source-compatible. * source files match upstream: 6469544c6c83a0aa33676421cb09d1a5 OpenFrame-3.05.tar.gz 6469544c6c83a0aa33676421cb09d1a5 OpenFrame-3.05.tar.gz-srpm * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * rpmlint is silent. ? final provides and requires are sane: perl(OpenFrame) perl(OpenFrame::Argument::Blob) perl(OpenFrame::Constants) perl(OpenFrame::Cookie) perl(OpenFrame::Cookies) perl(OpenFrame::Object) perl(OpenFrame::Request) perl(OpenFrame::Response) perl(OpenFrame::Segment::ContentLoader) perl(OpenFrame::Segment::HTTP::Request) perl(OpenFrame::Segment::HTTP::Response) perl-OpenFrame = 3.05-1.fc6 - perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8) perl(CGI) perl(CGI::Cookie) perl(Exporter) perl(File::Spec) perl(File::Temp) perl(File::Type) perl(File::Type) >= 0.01 perl(FileHandle) perl(HTTP::Headers) perl(HTTP::Request) >= 0.01 perl(HTTP::Response) perl(HTTP::Status) perl(IO::Null) perl(IO::Null) >= 0.01 perl(OpenFrame) perl(OpenFrame::Argument::Blob) perl(OpenFrame::Cookie) perl(OpenFrame::Cookies) perl(OpenFrame::Object) perl(OpenFrame::Request) perl(OpenFrame::Response) perl(OpenFrame::Segment::HTTP::Response) perl(Pipeline) perl(Pipeline) >= 2.00 perl(Pipeline::Production) perl(Pipeline::Segment) perl(base) perl(constant) perl(strict) perl(warnings::register) * no shared libraries are present. * package is not relocatable. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * %clean is present. * %check is present and all tests pass (after adding File::Find::Rule): All tests successful. Files=6, Tests=54, 1 wallclock secs ( 0.39 cusr + 0.16 csys = 0.55 CPU) * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no libtool .la droppings. * not a GUI app. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 26 04:56:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 May 2006 00:56:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193059] Review Request: ibmasm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605260456.k4Q4ueAH008915@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ibmasm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193059 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |cweyl at alumni.drew.edu ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-05-26 00:49 EST ------- Not a review, but a couple thoughts -- which I'll preface by saying I'd love to see this one in extras : * As this isn't a kernel or a kernel module, a group of "Applications/System" is probably more appropriate than "System Environment/Kernel" * I'm pretty sure the license isn't GPL, as, e.g., ibmasm/src/rsa.h states: "This software may be used and distributed according to the terms of the Lesser GNU Public License, incorporated herein by reference". * A full upstream source URL is required, such that the code tarball can be fetched independently. * With respect to "ExclusiveArch: i386", why exclude x86_64? Is this documented somewhere? --- On a different level, why not make this a public bug? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 26 05:36:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 May 2006 01:36:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193216] New: Review Request: qcwebcam Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193216 Summary: Review Request: qcwebcam Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: panemade at gmail.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/pnemade/Qcwebcam/qcwebcam.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/pnemade/Qcwebcam/qcwebcam-1.1-3.fc5.src.rpm Description: This is the webcam viewer package. It requires webcam's kernel driver to be installed and then use this software to view streaming video,record video,save images from video. Features of Qcwebcam :- View Live Video: done Change Brightness: done Change White Balance: done Change Contrast: done Change Image Size (5 Options ): done Change Image Formats ( 8 Options ) : done Change depth (2 settings): done Freeze picture: done Snap picture: done Automatic brightness: NOT done. Filters: RGB-> BGR Conversion Support for color cameras: done Timer: done Video Recording : done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 26 05:41:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 May 2006 01:41:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193216] Review Request: qcwebcam In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605260541.k4Q5fxdF010448@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qcwebcam https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193216 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|devel |fc5 Platform|All |i386 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 26 06:48:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 May 2006 02:48:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177583] Review Request: zaptel-kmod In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605260648.k4Q6mGeX013048@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: zaptel-kmod https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177583 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at leemhuis.info 2006-05-26 02:40 EST ------- (In reply to comment #33) > So, is the kernel module setup finalized in fedora extras now? > Or still in flux? I suppose there will be changes required in the future (some approaching in the next days), but consider it ready to use. But maintainers of kmod-packages should be prepared that they need to adjust things now and them to some new developments. http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/KernelModules > kmodtool 0.10.10 is out if you want to update to that. > Should there be a kmodtool package that the other kernel packages BuildRequire: > instead of including it in each kernel module package? No. It should either be in the SRPM or in redhat-rpm-macros. Shipping it stand-alone will lead to problems. > I was able to build this package in mock, but only for the exact kernel on my > development machine and with just it's exact arch. Then there is probalby something wrong in the spec. > Can mock be used to build > kmod packages? Yes. Luvna does it already for some weeks. >If so, how should it be called? No special handling should be needed. > I'd be happy to review this package provided the specs are finalized now... http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/KernelModules > (or perhaps one of the folks that wrote the kmodtool would be interested in > making this a test case...) lirc-kmod and thinkpad-kmod should show how it's done properly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 26 06:57:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 May 2006 02:57:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192889] Review Request: openais standards based cluster framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605260657.k4Q6vfId013397@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: openais standards based cluster framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192889 ------- Additional Comments From sdake at redhat.com 2006-05-26 02:50 EST ------- Paul, Thanks for all of your wonderful comments. There is a new srpm and specfile available below: Spec URL: http://developer.osdl.org/dev/openais/SRPM/openais.spec SRPM URL: http://developer.osdl.org/dev/openais/SRPM/openais-0.76-1.0.src.rpm I have tested that the "make install" part works on x86_64 and i386 and that on fedora core 5 the openais package runs properly from the init script. Would you provide one last sanity check? Thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 26 07:24:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 May 2006 03:24:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192889] Review Request: openais standards based cluster framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605260724.k4Q7OW6N014480@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: openais standards based cluster framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192889 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2006-05-26 03:16 EST ------- - Still shipping static libs - Packages still contain unowned dirs - Compilation still doesn't honor optflags Without having looked into details, packaging of dynamic libs/plugins seems to be way off from any common conventions on Linux. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 26 08:58:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 May 2006 04:58:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192889] Review Request: openais standards based cluster framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605260858.k4Q8wr1F022599@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: openais standards based cluster framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192889 ------- Additional Comments From sdake at redhat.com 2006-05-26 04:51 EST ------- (In reply to comment #18) > - Still shipping static libs > - Packages still contain unowned dirs > - Compilation still doesn't honor optflags > > Without having looked into details, packaging of dynamic libs/plugins seems to > be way off from any common conventions on Linux. > Thank you for your comments. Regarding issue #1: Based upon feedback with the user community there are many people which would like to link statically to the libraries. That is one of the motivations of the project being BSD instead of lgpl. I see two choices. I can either a) add the above text as a comment in the specfile or b) remove the static libs entirely from the rpm. I suppose option B has the effect of people then complaining that the openais package doesn't have the static libs. Rather more important for me is inclusion of the package in Fedora Core 6, so if static libs are non-negotiable they can be removed and I'll deal with the complaining from the user community. Regarding issue #2: I am not sure which unowned dirs I am missing. Would you be kind enough point them out to me? Thanks. Regarding issue #3: Somehow I uploaded the wrong specfile to the site. I did fix the optflags issue as per Paul's suggestion, and checked the specfile on my laptop has this change. I'll upload another tomorrow with the unowned dirs change (if you could point out the unowned dirs). rpmlint doesn't seem to complain about this. Regarding issue #4: Could you please provide an argument for packaging conventions being way off from common conventions in Linux. What exactly is wrong? I need to understand what is unsuitable about the packaging methods so they can be fixed (or I can convince you otherwise). I'll take a stab anyway: The packaging of the dynamic libs as files "libSaAmf.so.1.0" as an example is required by the SA Forum specification. We try to match the specification as closely as possible for code portability between implementations. Hence using "libsaamf.so.1.0" is not suitable. First it would not be compliant with the specification, second code portability would be reduced. I know the naming is obnoxious. The libraries should go into a separate library (and this is indeed the default of upstream) so that different SA Forum implementations may be tried on the same system. Since the filenames of the libraries are defined in the spec, if we installed to /usr/lib or /usr/lib64, it would prevent people from installing alternative implementations. The plugins (the .lcrso files) are a mechanism for exporting interfaces and supporting "Live Component Replacement" ie: replacing a plugin that is already loaded with a replacement component without service interruption. This is not really a plugin and a shared object doesn't get the job done. It is more of a complete component providing a specific service (for example, we have an object database component which is never used directly by any APIs). If you have a suggestion as to where these should "live" rather then /usr/lib/lcrso or /usr/lib64/lcrso, I'd entertain getting this changed upstream. As is, we intend to produce various other lcrso components for use by various projects (and our lcrso's are totally reusable). Regards -steve -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 26 08:59:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 May 2006 04:59:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 186327] Review Request: tcltls In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605260859.k4Q8xhfn022655@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tcltls https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=186327 ------- Additional Comments From tjikkun at xs4all.nl 2006-05-26 04:52 EST ------- I now have filled it out, and I applied for a cvsextras account. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 26 09:13:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 May 2006 05:13:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188574] Review Request: rss-glx -- Really Slick Screensavers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605260913.k4Q9DL0b023187@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rss-glx -- Really Slick Screensavers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188574 ------- Additional Comments From nphilipp at redhat.com 2006-05-26 05:05 EST ------- Agreed, at least symlinking those files in the xscreensavers subpackage sounds feasible, which might also help with xscreensaver-demo. The placement of them in /usr/bin is upstream matter and I'll leave them there. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 26 09:35:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 May 2006 05:35:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192889] Review Request: openais standards based cluster framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605260935.k4Q9ZrFp024034@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: openais standards based cluster framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192889 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2006-05-26 05:28 EST ------- (In reply to comment #19) > (In reply to comment #18) > > - Still shipping static libs > > - Packages still contain unowned dirs > > - Compilation still doesn't honor optflags > > > > Without having looked into details, packaging of dynamic libs/plugins seems to > > be way off from any common conventions on Linux. > > > > Thank you for your comments. > > Regarding issue #1 > : > Based upon feedback with the user community there are many people which would > like to link statically to the libraries. Yes, some undereducated users and some undereducated maintainers are stubborn about static libs. > I see two choices. Nope, you have only have these choices: 1. Not shipping static libs 2. Prove why you must ship static libs. > Regarding issue #2 > : > I am not sure which unowned dirs I am missing. Would you be kind enough point > them out to me? Thanks. Pardon, but this is your job. Install and deinstall your packages and check which dirs remain on the file system or check the output of rpm -qlp Hint: rpm -qlp openais-0.76-1.0.i386.rpm | grep share/doc rpm -qlp openais-0.76-1.0.i386.rpm | grep etc > Regarding issue #3 > : > Somehow I uploaded the wrong specfile to the site. I used the src.rpm from comment #17. > Regarding issue #4 > : > Could you please provide an argument for packaging conventions being way off > from common conventions in Linux. > What exactly is wrong? Almost everything: >From the non-devel package: /usr/lib/openais/lcrso/service_amf.lcrso >From the devel package: /usr/lib/openais/libSaAmf.a /usr/lib/openais/libSaAmf.so.1.0 Now compare this against any arbitrary package. Devel package: libXXX.so -> libXXX.so.1.2.3 non-devel package: libXXX.so.1 -> libXXX.so.1.2.3 > The packaging of the dynamic libs as files "libSaAmf.so.1.0" as an example is > required by the SA Forum specification. We try to match the specification as > closely as possible for code portability between implementations. Any such approach is doomed to fail. Nothing about shared library naming is portable, but you can't avoid using the conventions and implications of the OS, so you must be using the conventions of the OS. Wrt. plugins, there is no convention. Their names can be arbibrarily choosen. IMO, xxxxxso is one of the weirdest approaches I've seen. In most cases their are named "*.so". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 26 09:49:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 May 2006 05:49:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193224] New: Review Request: streamer Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193224 Summary: Review Request: streamer Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: panemade at gmail.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/pnemade/Qcwebcam/streamer.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/pnemade/Qcwebcam/streamer-1.1-2.fc5.src.rpm Description: This is the coammnd line tool to record streaming video from qcwebcam package. This is extracted from XawTv package. All the original work is done by Gerd Knorr and i did only packaging part for qcwebcam package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 26 09:50:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 May 2006 05:50:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193224] Review Request: streamer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605260950.k4Q9ounj024738@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: streamer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193224 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|devel |fc5 Platform|All |i386 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 26 09:53:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 May 2006 05:53:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187430] Review Request: elektra In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605260953.k4Q9r8jO024822@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: elektra https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187430 ------- Additional Comments From che666 at gmail.com 2006-05-26 05:45 EST ------- manpage conflict with allegro-devel LANG=C rpm -i /home/che/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/elektra-devel-0.6.1-30.x86_64.rpm file /usr/share/man/man3/key.3.gz from install of elektra-devel-0.6.1-30 conflicts with file from package allegro-devel-4.2.0-12.fc5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 26 11:10:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 May 2006 07:10:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 173459] Review Request: initng In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605261110.k4QBARNI028498@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 ------- Additional Comments From daner964 at student.liu.se 2006-05-26 07:02 EST ------- (In reply to comment #310) > still broken: > cc1: warnings being treated as errors > /home/dragoran/rpm/BUILD/initng-0.6.7/plugins/bash_parser/runiscript.c: In > function 'main': > /home/dragoran/rpm/BUILD/initng-0.6.7/plugins/bash_parser/runiscript.c:50: > warning: ignoring return value of 'getcwd', declared with attribute > warn_unused_result Sorry. Fixed this one too in svn and this time I checked so that I don't get any more warnings ;-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 26 11:27:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 May 2006 07:27:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188574] Review Request: rss-glx -- Really Slick Screensavers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605261127.k4QBRtU0029149@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rss-glx -- Really Slick Screensavers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188574 ------- Additional Comments From nphilipp at redhat.com 2006-05-26 07:20 EST ------- The new SRPM is at: http://tiptoe.de/dav/rss-glx-0.8.1.p-0.5.src.rpm Changes: - Contains the symlinks for XScreenSaver/kxs* - owns non-standard directories -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 26 11:29:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 May 2006 07:29:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188574] Review Request: rss-glx -- Really Slick Screensavers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605261129.k4QBTpub029277@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rss-glx -- Really Slick Screensavers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188574 ------- Additional Comments From nphilipp at redhat.com 2006-05-26 07:22 EST ------- Wrong URL (cut and paste error), real one is: http://tiptoe.de/dav/rss-glx-0.8.1.p-0.6.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 26 13:01:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 May 2006 09:01:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 181599] Review Request: gallery: web based photo album software In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605261301.k4QD1Z7G000833@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gallery: web based photo album software https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=181599 ------- Additional Comments From jwb at redhat.com 2006-05-26 08:54 EST ------- I've just retested against the -17svn packages and successfully created the gallery. I'm on a fairly vanilla FC5 machine, no outlandish configs. I'm going to take a wild guess here, and I may be way off my rocker, but this looks like it could be either disk space or SELinux getting in the way. I don't set any SELinux contexts on either /var/www/gallery2 or /srv/gallery2 per earlier comments in this bug, and the bit about the error coming from GalleryCoreApi::addGroupPermission is setting off red flags and clanging bells for me... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 26 13:21:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 May 2006 09:21:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189268] Review Request: xscreensaver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605261321.k4QDL9TD001674@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xscreensaver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189268 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-05-26 09:13 EST ------- XScreenSaver final 5.00 is released. I prepared : for FC5 updates: http://www.ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~mtasaka/dist/core/updates/testing/5/SPECS/xscreensaver.spec http://www.ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~mtasaka/dist/core/updates/testing/5/SRPMS/xscreensaver-4.24-3.2.src.rpm for EXTRAS: http://www.ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~mtasaka/dist/extras/development/SPECS/xscreensaver.spec http://www.ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~mtasaka/dist/extras/development/SRPMS/xscreensaver-5.00-0.2.src.rpm So, please someone will sponser me? This is my FIRST package. I cannot still login to fedora cvs-extras building system by cvs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 26 14:08:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 May 2006 10:08:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 173459] Review Request: initng In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605261408.k4QE8LZT004474@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 ------- Additional Comments From che666 at gmail.com 2006-05-26 10:00 EST ------- going to do another 64 bit test build with svn then. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 26 14:18:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 May 2006 10:18:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193059] Review Request: ibmasm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605261418.k4QEIx0Y005029@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ibmasm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193059 konradr at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Group|fedora_contrib | ------- Additional Comments From konradr at redhat.com 2006-05-26 10:11 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > Not a review, but a couple thoughts -- which I'll preface by saying I'd love to > see this one in extras : > > * As this isn't a kernel or a kernel module, a group of "Applications/System" is > probably more appropriate than "System Environment/Kernel" OK. Will change. > > * I'm pretty sure the license isn't GPL, as, e.g., ibmasm/src/rsa.h states: > "This software may be used and distributed according to the terms of the Lesser > GNU Public License, incorporated herein by reference". Uhuh. Let me speak with the author to get clarificaton on this. > > * A full upstream source URL is required, such that the code tarball can be > fetched independently. Working on having it in sourceforge > > * With respect to "ExclusiveArch: i386", why exclude x86_64? Is this documented > somewhere? No/Yes. The ibmasm module is only enabled for i386. The RSA(1) adapter was never shipped in machines that support 64-bit mode, so no need for 64-bit package. > > --- > > On a different level, why not make this a public bug? Hmm. Good thought - seems that by mistake I had it set to Fedora contributors only. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 26 14:19:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 May 2006 10:19:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190390] Review Request: AGReader: Console reader for viewing AmigaGuide files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605261419.k4QEJDvS005133@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: AGReader: Console reader for viewing AmigaGuide files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190390 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-05-26 10:11 EST ------- Hi, I just came accross your DevIL rpms and thus your rpm site and I thought, now why doesn't he become an FE contributer, then I thought: maybe he already is a contributer but DevIL hasn't been reviewed yet. Searching for a DevIL review request didn't help. Searching for bugs with your email in it however has helped, so here we are. I can sponsor people and you seem to need a sponsor so that makes us a good match I guess :) First of all please carefully / thoroughly read: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/Contributors If you would have you would have known that you should have made this bug also block the FE-NEEDSPONSOR bug. Although many people seem to miss this and you do seem to have read the other guidelines (judging from your DevIL spec), if not please also thoroughly read: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines I'll start todo a review for this package as described on: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines Could you please submit DevIL and cegui for review too, then once all 3 are approved you can create an account, I'll sponsor you and then you can import all 3 of them. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 26 14:45:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 May 2006 10:45:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190390] Review Request: AGReader: Console reader for viewing AmigaGuide files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605261445.k4QEje5f007181@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: AGReader: Console reader for viewing AmigaGuide files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190390 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-05-26 10:38 EST ------- Hmm, Before I do a full Review of this one here is a list of things to fix on forehand: 1) You write: # It is perhaps preferable to patch the source for compilation with gcc 4+ than # force compilation with gcc 3.2 as is done here Yes IMHO that is a must fix item, please write a patch so that it will compile with gcc-4.1 (and submit it upstream also please) and use that instead of this hack. If you find it hard to write this patch / encounter problems feel free to ask for help. I'm more the willing to write this patch for you when asked. 2) Inconsistent macro usage: "%{__rm} -rf %{buildroot}" in %cleanb instead use just "rm -rf %{buildroot}" as you do in %install. If you want to use %__cmd, you should use it everywhere, so also for make, install etc. But please don't :) Also I have doubts about the capitalization of the name, I thought it was prefered to use just lowercase, I've started a discussion about this on f-e-l. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 26 14:46:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 May 2006 10:46:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193108] Review Request: libsexymm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605261446.k4QEkBFl007236@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libsexymm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193108 ------- Additional Comments From karlthered at gmail.com 2006-05-26 10:38 EST ------- wrong spec file URL: http://darkenphoenix.free.fr/RPMS/RPMS/Extras/SPECS/libsexymm.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 26 14:46:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 May 2006 10:46:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190390] Review Request: AGReader: Console reader for viewing AmigaGuide files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605261446.k4QEkRnt007266@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: AGReader: Console reader for viewing AmigaGuide files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190390 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-05-26 10:38 EST ------- One last question, could you post an URL to some amigaguides, so I can test this program? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 26 14:48:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 May 2006 10:48:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193109] Review Request: plotmm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605261448.k4QEmcCP007440@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: plotmm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193109 ------- Additional Comments From karlthered at gmail.com 2006-05-26 10:40 EST ------- new SRPM: http://darkenphoenix.free.fr/RPMS/RPMS/Extras/SRPMS/plotmm-0.1.2-2.src.rpm * Blockers: - samples applications are now in a separated package: plotmm-examples and moved them to %{_libdir}/plotmm/examples, and changed their name into plotmm-* - added the documentation in the devel package * rpmlint complaints: - the named issues were fixed - rpmlint output about current packages $ rpmlint plotmm-0.1.2-2.i386.rpm W: plotmm one-line-command-in-%post /sbin/ldconfig W: plotmm one-line-command-in-%postun /sbin/ldconfig $ rpmlint /home/isshin/rpmbuild/RPMS/i386/plotmm-devel-0.1.2-2.i386.rpm $ rpmlint /home/isshin/rpmbuild/RPMS/i386/plotmm-examples-0.1.2-2.i386.rpm W: plotmm-examples no-documentation * general issue - This was an oversight, I have corrected it in plotmm and other packages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 26 14:53:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 May 2006 10:53:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191507] Review Request: wifi-radar In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605261453.k4QErdcf007775@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wifi-radar https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191507 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |tcallawa at redhat.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2006-05-26 10:46 EST ------- There are a few minor issues with this package: - The package needs to properly handle its desktop file: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#desktop Don't forget to include BuildRequires: desktop-file-utils - rpmlint throws some errors: W: wifi-radar conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/wifi-radar/wifi-radar.conf Might not be a bad idea to set this as %config(missingok,noreplace) to keep some other package from stepping on this config file. E: wifi-radar non-readable /etc/wifi-radar/wifi-radar.conf 0600 I'm pretty sure you didn't intend this. Or did you? E: wifi-radar non-standard-dir-perm /etc/wifi-radar 0700 Also a weird permission set for the config directory. E: wifi-radar non-standard-dir-perm /usr/share/doc/wifi-radar-1.9.6 0644 I don't see the reason to deviate from the standard %doc permission set, even though 644 is valid. Good items: - package meets naming guidelines - license (GPL) OK, text in %doc, matches source - spec file legible, in am. english - source matches upstream - package compiles on devel (x86) - no missing BR (except for desktop-file-utils) - no unnecessary BR - no locales - not relocatable - owns all directories that it creates - no duplicate files - %clean ok - macro use consistent - code, not content - no need for documentation subpackage - nothing in %doc affects runtime Show me a new spec with the minor blockers listed above resolved and I'll sponsor/approve. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 26 14:58:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 May 2006 10:58:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193157] Review Request: system-config-selinux In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605261458.k4QEwhv2008119@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: system-config-selinux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193157 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-05-26 10:51 EST ------- Would it not be possible for Red Hat-internal projects like this to have their own mini-homepage so that URL: tags of http://www.redhat.com/ and Source0: tags that aren't full URLs could be avoided? Perhaps the spec file template could be updated to use the more modern "make DESTDIR=${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}" style instead of "%makeinstall"? /usr/share/system-config-selinux/semanagegui.py and /usr/share/system-config-selinux/system-config-selinux.py have shellbangs: #!/usr/bin/python2 which lead to bogus dependencies on /usr/bin/python2, which make the package uninstallable. Since at least the latter needs to be directly executable, it should have a shellbang pointing to /usr/bin/python It would be nice if the .pyo files were %ghosted, as is the usual practice these days. "manageing" in %description should be "managing" Regarding Comment #1, which Hardset Requires are you referring to? I can only see the usermode dep, and that's needed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 26 15:01:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 May 2006 11:01:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193240] New: Review Request: XaraLX - Vector/general purpose graphics utility Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193240 Summary: Review Request: XaraLX - Vector/general purpose graphics utility Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: tcallawa at redhat.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/XaraLX.spec SRPM URL: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/XaraLX-0.5-1.src.rpm Description: General purpose and vector graphics program, supports photo, graphics, and illustration creation and editing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 26 15:04:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 May 2006 11:04:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193157] Review Request: system-config-selinux In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605261504.k4QF4Qh7008559@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: system-config-selinux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193157 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-05-26 10:56 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > /usr/share/system-config-selinux/semanagegui.py > and > /usr/share/system-config-selinux/system-config-selinux.py > > have shellbangs: > #!/usr/bin/python2 > > which lead to bogus dependencies on /usr/bin/python2, which make the package > uninstallable. Since at least the latter needs to be directly executable, it > should have a shellbang pointing to /usr/bin/python Please forget I said this nonsense! Whoops. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 26 15:15:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 May 2006 11:15:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193109] Review Request: plotmm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605261515.k4QFFUrj009452@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: plotmm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193109 ------- Additional Comments From karlthered at gmail.com 2006-05-26 11:07 EST ------- new SRPM: http://darkenphoenix.free.fr/RPMS/RPMS/Extras/SRPMS/plotmm-0.1.2-2.src.rpm * Blockers: - samples applications are now in a separated package: plotmm-examples and moved them to %{_libdir}/plotmm/examples, and changed their name into plotmm-* - added the documentation in the devel package * rpmlint complaints: - the named issues were fixed - rpmlint output about current packages $ rpmlint plotmm-0.1.2-2.i386.rpm W: plotmm one-line-command-in-%post /sbin/ldconfig W: plotmm one-line-command-in-%postun /sbin/ldconfig $ rpmlint /home/isshin/rpmbuild/RPMS/i386/plotmm-devel-0.1.2-2.i386.rpm $ rpmlint /home/isshin/rpmbuild/RPMS/i386/plotmm-examples-0.1.2-2.i386.rpm W: plotmm-examples no-documentation * general issue - This was an oversight, I have corrected it in plotmm and other packages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 26 15:20:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 May 2006 11:20:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 181599] Review Request: gallery2: web based photo album software In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605261520.k4QFK24p009801@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gallery2: web based photo album software https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=181599 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: gallery: web|Review Request: gallery2: |based photo album software |web based photo album | |software ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-05-26 11:12 EST ------- Re: comment #54, I couldn't get a multisite to work either (same error as you...), but *did* get single-site to work. I was testing 16svn on a rhel4 box though... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 26 15:22:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 May 2006 11:22:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193157] Review Request: system-config-selinux In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605261522.k4QFM9iv010088@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: system-config-selinux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193157 ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-05-26 11:14 EST ------- One would wager that rpm macros need to be updated for %makeinstall if it is not 'modern' enough. The previous spec had: Requires: gnome-python2, pygtk2, pygtk2-libglade, gnome-python2-canvas Requires: policycoreutils Requires: rhpl >= 0.148.2 usermode Requires: python >= 2.3 These have been removed, but the version wasn't updated, nor was made mention that this change had happened. The other NEEDSWORK are still needed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 26 15:22:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 May 2006 11:22:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 181599] Review Request: gallery2: web based photo album software In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605261522.k4QFMX4O010112@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gallery2: web based photo album software https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=181599 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-05-26 11:14 EST ------- Small nitpick: Packaging Guidelines say to use (something like) Release: 0.17.svn20060524 instead of Release: 0.17svn20060524 (ie, put a . between 0.x and the cvs/svn bits) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 26 15:35:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 May 2006 11:35:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193154] Review Request: asymptote - Descriptive vector graphics language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605261535.k4QFZBw0010707@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: asymptote - Descriptive vector graphics language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193154 ------- Additional Comments From jpo at di.uminho.pt 2006-05-26 11:27 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > A proposal for what I did instead of the patch: > add the option docdir=doc-install to configure, then you > can simply use %doc doc-install/* in the files section: > %doc LICENSE README TODO BUGS > %doc doc-install/* > %doc doc/asymptote.pdf Don't you have two different directories with doc files ( /usr/share/doc/asymptote-1.0x/ and /doc-install/) ? Can you send the configure patch to me? And I will try to have it applied uptream. In the past two months I have been able to have some patches/suggestions applied upstream (one of them was the DESTDIR variable). > * Possibly add a file asy-init.el to /usr/share/emacs/site-lisp/site-start.d: > (autoload 'asy-mode "asy-mode.el" "Asymptote major mode." t) > (add-to-list 'auto-mode-alist '("\\.asy$" . asy-mode)) > and something analogous for xemacs. I'm not a Emacs/Xemacs user but I rather have it upstream. Can you attach a full asy-mode.el to this ticket? I will send it upstream. jpo -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 26 15:37:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 May 2006 11:37:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193157] Review Request: system-config-selinux In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605261537.k4QFbfrJ010991@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: system-config-selinux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193157 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-05-26 11:29 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > One would wager that rpm macros need to be updated for %makeinstall if it is not > 'modern' enough. Not sure that's good idea. Most packages will work with either approach, but some will depend on the way one or the other works, and will fail with the alternative approach. > The previous spec had: > > Requires: gnome-python2, pygtk2, pygtk2-libglade, gnome-python2-canvas > Requires: policycoreutils > Requires: rhpl >= 0.148.2 usermode > Requires: python >= 2.3 I wonder if it was a good idea to remove these since none of these deps (even the python(abi) = 2.4 dep that I'd expect) have been found automatically by rpm. > These have been removed, but the version wasn't updated, nor was made mention > that this change had happened. Hmm, not good. Please update the release tag whenever a change is made to the package, so it's easy to tell which comments refer to which version of the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 26 15:40:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 May 2006 11:40:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193157] Review Request: system-config-selinux In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605261540.k4QFej0W011342@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: system-config-selinux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193157 ------- Additional Comments From dwalsh at redhat.com 2006-05-26 11:33 EST ------- Should the python code be #!/usr/bin/python -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 26 15:43:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 May 2006 11:43:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193154] Review Request: asymptote - Descriptive vector graphics language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605261543.k4QFhCFL011663@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: asymptote - Descriptive vector graphics language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193154 ------- Additional Comments From jpo at di.uminho.pt 2006-05-26 11:35 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > Output of rpmlint: > W: asymptote symlink-should-be-relative /usr/share/emacs/site-lisp/asy-mode.el > /usr/share/asymptote/asy-mode.el > W: asymptote symlink-should-be-relative /usr/share/vim/vim64/syntax/asy.vim > /usr/share/asymptote/asy.vim > W: asymptote symlink-should-be-relative /usr/share/vim/vim70/syntax/asy.vim > /usr/share/asymptote/asy.vim > W: asymptote symlink-should-be-relative /usr/share/vim/vim63/syntax/asy.vim > /usr/share/asymptote/asy.vim > W: asymptote symlink-should-be-relative > /usr/share/xemacs/site-packages/lisp/asy-mode.el /usr/share/asymptote/asy-mode.el > W: asymptote dangerous-command-in-%trigger ln > W: asymptote dangerous-command-in-%trigger ln > W: asymptote dangerous-command-in-%trigger rm > W: asymptote dangerous-command-in-%trigger rm > W: asymptote percent-in-%trigger > W: asymptote dangerous-command-in-%trigger ln > W: asymptote percent-in-%trigger > W: asymptote dangerous-command-in-%trigger rm > W: asymptote percent-in-%trigger > W: asymptote dangerous-command-in-%trigger rm All these trigger scripts are very fragile. The emacs/xemacs triggers are almost identically to ones shipped in the fedora-rpmdevtools package. The vim triggers are a little more complicated as vim includes the major version in its directories (I had to ghost a lot of directories - vim63 for FC-4, vim64 for FC-5, and vim70 for devel - in order to avoid unowned directories). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 26 15:43:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 May 2006 11:43:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 181599] Review Request: gallery2: web based photo album software In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605261543.k4QFhaP3011712@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gallery2: web based photo album software https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=181599 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-05-26 11:35 EST ------- I tried both multisite and single site and couldn't get either to work. I did try the multisite first tho, and it might have left some junk around that prevented the single site from working. Selinux is off. Lots of disk space. I will try and investigate further later tonight. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 26 15:43:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 May 2006 11:43:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193059] Review Request: ibmasm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605261543.k4QFhbfX011739@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ibmasm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193059 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-05-26 11:36 EST ------- Are you sponsored for fedora extras, with cvsextras group membership? If not, you should set this bug to block FE-NEEDSPONSOR as well, so the right people who can do that are aware.... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 26 15:47:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 May 2006 11:47:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193157] Review Request: system-config-selinux In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605261547.k4QFlijN012156@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: system-config-selinux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193157 ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-05-26 11:40 EST ------- Looks like our rpm autodetection of deps doesn't work on python scripts. Sorry for the noise Dan, you should put those deps back. /me wonders if anybody is working on making rpm autodetect python deps. /usr/bin/python2 would work, it ensures you're using at least python 2.x -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 26 15:56:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 May 2006 11:56:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193059] Review Request: ibmasm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605261556.k4QFuZj2013032@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ibmasm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193059 konradr at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 26 16:01:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 May 2006 12:01:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193157] Review Request: system-config-selinux In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605261601.k4QG1FeY013401@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: system-config-selinux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193157 ------- Additional Comments From dwalsh at redhat.com 2006-05-26 11:53 EST ------- Back to the future. Updated to 0.0.3 Spec URL: ftp://people.redhat.com/dwalsh/SELinux/system-config-selinux.spec SRPM URL: ftp://people.redhat.com/dwalsh/SELinux/system-config-selinux-0.0.3-1.src.rpm Description: system-config-selinux is a gui front end to the semanage tool. This tool allows you to configure all parts of the SELinux environment. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 26 16:37:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 May 2006 12:37:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190493] Review Request: python-yaml In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605261637.k4QGbKwL015642@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-yaml https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190493 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 26 16:43:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 May 2006 12:43:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193154] Review Request: asymptote - Descriptive vector graphics language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605261643.k4QGhfRB016233@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: asymptote - Descriptive vector graphics language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193154 ------- Additional Comments From jpo at di.uminho.pt 2006-05-26 12:36 EST ------- Package update: http://gsd.di.uminho.pt/jpo/software/fedora/asymptote.spec http://gsd.di.uminho.pt/jpo/software/fedora/asymptote-1.06-2.src.rpm Changelog: Corrects the directories ownership. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 26 16:48:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 May 2006 12:48:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 169703] Review Request: pari - Number Theory-oriented Computer Algebra System In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605261648.k4QGmHvX016666@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pari - Number Theory-oriented Computer Algebra System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=169703 ------- Additional Comments From orion at cora.nwra.com 2006-05-26 12:40 EST ------- On final suggestion (feel free to ignore), but I'm a sucker for tests: %check make dobench make dotest-compat make dotest-intnum make dotest-qfbsolve make dotest-rfrac make dotest-round4 make dotest-stark Just runs the extra tests that don't require and external dataset. In any case, the package is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 26 16:59:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 May 2006 12:59:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193157] Review Request: system-config-selinux In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605261659.k4QGxAh2017204@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: system-config-selinux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193157 ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-05-26 12:51 EST ------- Almost there (; Now we're just missing a BuildRequires: on desktop-file-utils (and a changelog to match the evr) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 26 17:08:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 May 2006 13:08:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193187] Review Request: pcsc-lite & ccid In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605261708.k4QH83Rx017612@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pcsc-lite & ccid https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193187 ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-05-26 13:00 EST ------- This still doesn't mean it has to be in Core. Since it is already in extras, lets skip to the step of getting approval for core by the technical lead. Bill? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 26 17:09:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 May 2006 13:09:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191014] Review Request: ganymed In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605261709.k4QH9F1q017695@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ganymed https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191014 bkonrath at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |overholt at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From bkonrath at redhat.com 2006-05-26 13:01 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > (In reply to comment #1) > > > * Why have all those macro definitions, conditional and otherwise, at the top > > instead of just... > > %define gcj_support 1 > > ? > > umm Ben Konrath added that part to my initial SPEC, I just thougth it was just > to make easy to package it for RHEL I just copied what our other eclipse packages do. Andrew, do you have any thoughts here? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 26 17:19:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 May 2006 13:19:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191014] Review Request: ganymed In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605261719.k4QHJMIV018191@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ganymed https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191014 ------- Additional Comments From overholt at redhat.com 2006-05-26 13:11 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > (In reply to comment #2) > > (In reply to comment #1) > > > > > * Why have all those macro definitions, conditional and otherwise, at the top > > > instead of just... > > > %define gcj_support 1 > > > ? > > > > umm Ben Konrath added that part to my initial SPEC, I just thougth it was just > > to make easy to package it for RHEL > > I just copied what our other eclipse packages do. Andrew, do you have any > thoughts here? Yeah, I added that stuff so that we could do the gcj_support conditionally but also for other RHEL-specific stuff. Outside of the Eclipse SDK we probably don't need it, though. gcj_support itself should be enough. Sorry. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 26 17:33:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 May 2006 13:33:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 186327] Review Request: tcltls In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605261733.k4QHXl8r018976@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tcltls https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=186327 ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2006-05-26 13:26 EST ------- I finally got around to a formal review. Most of the issues have already been addreessed above, but there's still a few remaining nits. MUST ==== * rpmlint output: W: tcltls-devel no-documentation ...which can be ignored because upstream doesn't provide development documentation. * Source matches upstream 9eeab472475773b3810acc808ebec759 SOURCES/tls1.5.0-src.tar.gz * BSD license ok, license file included * Spec file legible and in Am. English * No excessive BR: * No locales * No shared libraries in the default linker path * Not relocatable * Owns the directory that it creates * No duplicate %files * buildroot cleaned where needed * No -docs subpackage needed * header file included in -devel package * No .desktop file needed * Package runs without crashing (tested with tclhttpd) * Builds in mock on: core4-i386, core4-x86_64, core5-i386, core5-x86_64, devel-i386 * File permissions look ok ANOMOLIES ========= * Package name does not match upstream (tcltls vs tls). However, the general convention outside of Fedora for naming Tcl packages is "tcl", which is already quite similar to Fedora's naming convention for language subpackages "tcl-". In this case I feel it's better to use either tcl or tcl- for the package name as 'tls' is too generic. * The version number is 1.5.0, yet upstream puts files in %{_libdir}/tls1.50. You should probably tell upstream to fix their directory name. You can also do it yourself in this package, but I won't consider it a blocker. Fixing the directory name would also remove the need for the majorver and minorver %defines in the spec file. MUSTFIX ======= * A more succinct summary would be "OpenSSL extension for Tcl" * Summary for the -devel package reads better as: "Header files for the OpenSSL extension for Tcl" * Minor nit: Remove the commented-out entry in %files and in %prep * Use a macro in %configure: %configure --with-ssl-dir=%{_prefix} * Group should be "Development/Libraries" * The URL, Version, and Group tags in the -devel subpackage aren't necessary. They are inherited from the base package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 26 17:47:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 May 2006 13:47:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189268] Review Request: xscreensaver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605261747.k4QHlujD019744@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xscreensaver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189268 rstrode at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |wtogami at redhat.com OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From rstrode at redhat.com 2006-05-26 13:40 EST ------- Hi Mamoru, Sorry there has been a bit of confusion on my part regarding getting you sponsored. At one point I was told all Red Hat employees are automatically sponsors. This changed at some point and so I need to get access to sponsor you. In the mean time, Jesse has approved your access. Sorry for the confusion. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 26 17:52:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 May 2006 13:52:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189268] Review Request: xscreensaver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605261752.k4QHqNn5020092@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xscreensaver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189268 ------- Additional Comments From rstrode at redhat.com 2006-05-26 13:44 EST ------- wrt to comment 31. The various hacks were removed because they would display uncensored images or content on the internet, or because they required packages we don't ship to use. Use your best judgement when deciding which things to remove or add from that file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 26 17:53:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 May 2006 13:53:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 169703] Review Request: pari - Number Theory-oriented Computer Algebra System In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605261753.k4QHrmAu020203@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pari - Number Theory-oriented Computer Algebra System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=169703 ------- Additional Comments From gemi at bluewin.ch 2006-05-26 13:46 EST ------- Imported to FC-4, FC-5 and FC-6. The last test "dostest-stark" fails with a segmentation fault. On ppc several test fail. Should we still go on and remove the failing tests? This is probably something we can't easily fix and should be reported upstream. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 26 17:56:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 May 2006 13:56:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193154] Review Request: asymptote - Descriptive vector graphics language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605261756.k4QHuWj7020554@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: asymptote - Descriptive vector graphics language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193154 ------- Additional Comments From gemi at bluewin.ch 2006-05-26 13:48 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=130037) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=130037&action=view) example spec file Here is the spec file I used. The doc-install is a temporary directory. Thus I can better decide what to include and not rely on "make install". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 26 18:01:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 May 2006 14:01:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193187] Review Request: pcsc-lite & ccid In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605261801.k4QI1nH8021038@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pcsc-lite & ccid https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193187 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2006-05-26 13:53 EST ------- By the way, if you're interested in maintaining these packages in Extras, that would be fine with me too. Some comments/notes anyway: > SRPM URL: [...] pcsc-lite-1.3.1-1.src.rpm Ick, this would not upgrade the version currently in Extras. Please bump the release tag. > This package is moving from Extras to Core. Changes from the extra version > include: These should be mentioned in the package's %changelog, otherwise it'll look like I'm responsible of the changes (some of which I consider regressions): > moved libpcsclite.so from devel to libs. Why? > make %config %config(noreplace) to make rpmlint happy (oh and it's the right > thing to do;). Partially disagreed. The FE package has /etc/reader.conf marked as %ghost %config. Actually the right thing to do would be to remove the %config altogether; this file is not something that anyone should go and modify, it's deleted and recreated from the contents of /etc/reader.conf.d/*.conf on every pcscd restart. One could also argue that a better place for the generated file would be somewhere in /var instead of /etc/reader.conf. Additionally, I see the new package marks /etc/reader.conf.d/README a %config(noreplace) file, which doesn't make sense to me. One other thing: the build dependency on graphviz was removed, but the HAVE_DOT = yes modification for doxygen's config is still in, that should probably be removed. > Generic USB CCID (Chip/Smart Card Interface Devices) driver. > This package is also moving from extras to core. The only change to this file > was removing the %(_dist) macro. Same problem here wrt. upgrading from the current FE version, please bump the release tag. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 26 18:05:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 May 2006 14:05:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193154] Review Request: asymptote - Descriptive vector graphics language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605261805.k4QI5nVV021189@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: asymptote - Descriptive vector graphics language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193154 ------- Additional Comments From gemi at bluewin.ch 2006-05-26 13:58 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=130038) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=130038&action=view) asy-mode autoload file for emacs This must go to: for emacs: /usr/share/emacs/site-lisp/site-start.d/asy-init.el for xemacs: /usr/share/xemacs/site-packages/lisp/site-start.d/asy-init.el -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 26 18:08:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 May 2006 14:08:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189268] Review Request: xscreensaver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605261808.k4QI8oeD021342@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xscreensaver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189268 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-05-26 14:01 EST ------- Hello, Ray. Okay. I just received the e-mail saying "Your Fedora cvsextras membership has been sponsored". Thanks!! Now I try to upload my src.rpm to EXTRAS-devel. For removing hacks issue, I discussed with Jamie several times. After that, I decided that now xscreensaver is about to move to FE, I will not remove any hacks as Jamie requires and I always do so. Additional comment is that for webcollage issue, xscreensaver 5.00 version now has the option that webcollage don't access to Web. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 26 18:10:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 May 2006 14:10:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 182415] Review Request: manpages-uk-utf8 - Ukrainian man pages from Linux Documentation Project In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605261810.k4QIAURj021439@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: manpages-uk-utf8 - Ukrainian man pages from Linux Documentation Project https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=182415 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|fedora-extras- |fedora-package- |list at redhat.com |review at redhat.com andy at smile.org.ua changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 26 18:11:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 May 2006 14:11:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193154] Review Request: asymptote - Descriptive vector graphics language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605261811.k4QIBHQv021491@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: asymptote - Descriptive vector graphics language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193154 ------- Additional Comments From jpo at di.uminho.pt 2006-05-26 14:03 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > Created an attachment (id=130037) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=130037&action=view) [edit] > example spec file > > Here is the spec file I used. The doc-install is a temporary directory. > Thus I can better decide what to include and not rely on "make install". That isn't enough as the docdir location is stored in a header file by the configure script. Right now I need to patch the configure script. jpo -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 26 18:19:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 May 2006 14:19:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193154] Review Request: asymptote - Descriptive vector graphics language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605261819.k4QIJ2C6022074@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: asymptote - Descriptive vector graphics language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193154 ------- Additional Comments From gemi at bluewin.ch 2006-05-26 14:11 EST ------- Hmm, I don't see where the problem. Maybe there is a misunderstanding... The files specified using %doc are copied to %{_docdir}/%{name}-%{version} and this directory with its content automatically included in the rpm. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 26 18:21:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 May 2006 14:21:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192413] libdhcp : IPv6 and IPv4 DHCP client and network configuration library API In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605261821.k4QILtYG022364@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: libdhcp : IPv6 and IPv4 DHCP client and network configuration library API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192413 ------- Additional Comments From jvdias at redhat.com 2006-05-26 14:13 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=130041) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=130041&action=view) patch against anaconda 11.1.0.21 to make loader2 use libdhcp There is now a slot-in pump replacement header file and a pump-compatible API in libdhcp-1.2 . Please check out the 'test_pump_static.c' and 'test_pump_dhcp.c' in the /usr/share/doc/libdhcp-1.2/examples directory from the libdhcp installation for examples of using the pump compatibility API - just type 'make' in that directory to build them. Running them under valgrind reports 0 errors or memory leaks. The first stab at the Doxygen documentation is now shipped in /usr/share/doc/libdhcp-*/html - this is still work in progress, and I hope to submit updated Doxygen documentation later today. Here is a patch against the latest anaconda-11.1.0.21 source to allow loader2 to compile and link with libdhcp . The one missing piece in the current FC-6 distro is a static /usr/lib/libnl.a - I've mailed Chris Aillon a patch to make libnl build a static version of itself in libnl-devel, and I hope to get this built later today. If using libnl is a major stumbling block, removing its use altogether from libdhcp would not be difficult - libdhcp only uses the lowest level libnl API for raw message building / sending - I removed any use of the libnl cache from libdhcp to avoid the memory leaks and valgrind errors that resulted. But having libnl support in libdhcp I think is a good idea since it allows users to do much more with libdhcp, eg. set queue disciplines / firewall rules that are not catered for by libdhcp alone. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 26 18:41:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 May 2006 14:41:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193271] New: Review Request: python-dns - DNS toolkit for Python Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193271 Summary: Review Request: python-dns - DNS toolkit for Python Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: jeff at ollie.clive.ia.us QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.ocjtech.us/python-dns-1.3.5-1.spec SRPM URL: http://www.ocjtech.us/python-dns-1.3.5-1.src.rpm Description: dnspython is a DNS toolkit for Python. It supports almost all record types. It can be used for queries, zone transfers, and dynamic updates. It supports TSIG authenticated messages and EDNS0. dnspython provides both high and low level access to DNS. The high level classes perform queries for data of a given name, type, and class, and return an answer set. The low level classes allow direct manipulation of DNS zones, messages, names, and records. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 26 18:42:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 May 2006 14:42:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192540] Review Request: cal3d - A skeletal based 3-D character animation library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605261842.k4QIgAf3024559@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cal3d - A skeletal based 3-D character animation library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192540 wart at kobold.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |wart at kobold.org OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2006-05-26 14:34 EST ------- MUST ==== * rpmlint output clean * source matches upstream 47b3b72c6adcf5351f0884639d606d05 cal3d-full-0.10.0.tar.bz2 * Macro usage consistent * Package named appropriately * Spec file legible and in Am. English * headers, .pc, and unversioned .so's are in -devel * -devel contains fully-versioned dependency on base package * LGPL license ok, license file included * No locales * ldconfig called in %post/%postun for shared libs * Not relocatable * Owns directories that it creates * No duplicate %files * Builds in mock on: FC4-i386, FC4-x86_64, FC5-i386, FC5-x86_64, devel-i386, devel-x86_64 SHOULD ====== * Ask upstream to include pregenerated configure scripts in their published tarballs. I heard through the grapevine that upstream has moved their download server off of sourceforge and produced a new source tarball that doesn't require running 'autoreconf'. I'd suggest using that tarball, but won't consider it a blocker. * My personal preference is to remove the *.la files in %install instead of %excluding them so that the %files section is cleaner. MUSTFIX ======= * Don't use %{name} in %description or the -devel package summary * Remove the leading 'A' from the Summary -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 26 18:44:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 May 2006 14:44:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193191] Review Request: rename of notify-daemon to notification-daemon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605261844.k4QIicMJ024952@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rename of notify-daemon to notification-daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193191 ------- Additional Comments From johnp at redhat.com 2006-05-26 14:36 EST ------- Fixed with suggestions. Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/johnp/files/notification-daemon/notification-daemon.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/johnp/files/notification-daemon/notification-daemon-0.3.5-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 26 18:52:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 May 2006 14:52:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 186327] Review Request: tcltls In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605261852.k4QIqHVS025993@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tcltls https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=186327 ------- Additional Comments From tjikkun at xs4all.nl 2006-05-26 14:44 EST ------- (In reply to comment #39) I fixed all, except for "Group tag in the -devel subpackage", since rpmbuild complains without it. I decided to change the tcltls name to tcl-tls because i was just thinking about that today, and i wanted to ask what was right, since in most other distros it is tcltls (that's why i chose it initially) but for fedora's naming tcl-tls seems most appropriate. http://amsn.hoentjen.eu/download/tcl-tls.spec http://amsn.hoentjen.eu/download/tcl-tls-1.5.0-9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 26 19:23:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 May 2006 15:23:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190390] Review Request: AGReader: Console reader for viewing AmigaGuide files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605261923.k4QJNRFO027755@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: AGReader: Console reader for viewing AmigaGuide files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190390 ------- Additional Comments From packages at amiga-hardware.com 2006-05-26 15:15 EST ------- Thanks very much for considering sponsoring me. Here's a link to an updated SRPM I did a couple of weeks back which fixed the inconsistent macro usage in the %clean section and also dropped the gcc32 patch file in favour of specifying CC=gcc32 on the make line - which I think is a saner method :). http://www.dribble.org.uk/AGReader.spec http://www.dribble.org.uk/AGReader-1.1-7.iss.src.rpm I would appreciate some help with regards to the gcc 4+ patch - not really being a C programmer. I'm aware of the issues regarding capital letters in package names but made a decision based on what the tarball was called "upstream" and that I'd released earlier versions of this package under that name. Although in this case the "upstream" may no longer actively be maintained which might make this package unsuitable for inclusion, in hindsight? Of course if it needs to be renamed - that's no problem :) There are a couple of AmigaGuide files included within the SRPM called test.guide and agr.guide but here's some links to a few more examples http://www.dribble.org.uk/gofetch.guide http://www.dribble.org.uk/qdevice.guide I will submit the cegui and DevIL RPMs shortly. Thanks very much :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 26 19:28:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 May 2006 15:28:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191667] Review Request: poker-engine - Python library that implements poker rules In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605261928.k4QJSjmd028059@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: poker-engine - Python library that implements poker rules https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191667 wart at kobold.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |wart at kobold.org OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 26 19:32:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 May 2006 15:32:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189611] Review Request: milter-regex regular expression based sendmail milter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605261932.k4QJWX9r028274@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: milter-regex regular expression based sendmail milter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189611 paul at city-fan.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-05-26 15:25 EST ------- Imported, owners.list updated, built successfully for devel, Fc-5, and FC-4. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 26 19:35:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 May 2006 15:35:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193281] New: Review Request: python-xmpp - Python library for easy scripting with Jabber Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193281 Summary: Review Request: python-xmpp - Python library for easy scripting with Jabber Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: jeff at ollie.clive.ia.us QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.ocjtech.us/python-xmpp-0.3.1-1.spec SRPM URL: http://www.ocjtech.us/python-xmpp-0.3.1-1.src.rpm Description: xmpppy is a Python library that is targeted to provide easy scripting with Jabber. Similar projects are Twisted Words and jabber.py. This library was not designed from scratch. It inherits some code from jabberpy and have very similar API in many places. Though it is separate project since it have almost completely different architecture and primarily aims to work with jabberd2 - the new Open Source Jabber Server. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 26 19:37:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 May 2006 15:37:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191592] Review Request: vorbisgain - Adds tags to Ogg Vorbis files to adjust the volume In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605261937.k4QJbN1t028615@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vorbisgain - Adds tags to Ogg Vorbis files to adjust the volume https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191592 ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at ameritech.net 2006-05-26 15:29 EST ------- Has this been build for FC5 & devel yet? If so, this can be closed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 26 19:37:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 May 2006 15:37:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 169703] Review Request: pari - Number Theory-oriented Computer Algebra System In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605261937.k4QJbr0K028709@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pari - Number Theory-oriented Computer Algebra System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=169703 ------- Additional Comments From orion at cora.nwra.com 2006-05-26 15:30 EST ------- Where does stark fail? It works for me on FC5 i386 and FCdev x86_64. As for ppc, for now we should ExcludeArch ppc and open a new bug against pari that blocks FE-ExcludeArch-ppc. I'll start doing some testing on my ppc machine to try and see what's up. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 26 19:38:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 May 2006 15:38:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193271] Review Request: python-dns - DNS toolkit for Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605261938.k4QJc28f028740@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-dns - DNS toolkit for Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193271 jeff at ollie.clive.ia.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |193281 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 26 19:38:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 May 2006 15:38:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193281] Review Request: python-xmpp - Python library for easy scripting with Jabber In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605261938.k4QJc1kc028731@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-xmpp - Python library for easy scripting with Jabber https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193281 jeff at ollie.clive.ia.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |193271 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 26 19:44:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 May 2006 15:44:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193187] Review Request: pcsc-lite & ccid In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605261944.k4QJiP8A029337@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pcsc-lite & ccid https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193187 ------- Additional Comments From notting at redhat.com 2006-05-26 15:36 EST ------- (In reply to comment #6) > This still doesn't mean it has to be in Core. Since it is already in extras, > lets skip to the step of getting approval for core by the technical lead. Well, if you want smart card login support, I suspect that means some portion of pam/gdm/etc is going to grow a direct dependency. If that's the case, it's fine with me. Login support generally seems like a Core feature Curious why .so moved from devel->lib. Why regenerate the config file on startup? Aside from requiring write access (/var/run/pcsc?), it seems wasteful. Can't it just read /etc/reader.conf.d/ directly? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 26 19:51:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 May 2006 15:51:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193154] Review Request: asymptote - Descriptive vector graphics language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605261951.k4QJpXmt029858@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: asymptote - Descriptive vector graphics language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193154 ------- Additional Comments From jpo at di.uminho.pt 2006-05-26 15:43 EST ------- (In reply to comment #8) > Hmm, I don't see where the problem. Maybe there is a misunderstanding... Please correct me if I misunderstood the following lines from comment #1 A proposal for what I did instead of the patch: add the option docdir=doc-install to configure, then you can simply use %doc doc-install/* in the files section: I read the above as: 1) please drop your patch because I have a better solution 2) you mention an configure option that I thought you had added (patch?) Now that I have seen your specfile you don't even touch the configure script or even override the configure macro default directories. Do you want me to drop the patch or not? > The files specified using %doc are copied to %{_docdir}/%{name}-%{version} > and this directory with its content automatically included in the rpm. Yes I know. I also think I finally understood what you meant by overriding the docdir makefile variable (not configure as stated in comment #1). But I don't like the solution as it appears to be more error prone (for example the main pdf file - asymptote.pdf - fails to be installed in the correct directory ant has to be manually added to the doc list). jpo -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 26 20:00:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 May 2006 16:00:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190940] Review Request: tangerine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605262000.k4QK06mp030127@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tangerine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190940 ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at ameritech.net 2006-05-26 15:52 EST ------- Spec URL: http://piedmont.homelinux.org/fedora/tangerine/tangerine.spec SRPM URL: http://piedmont.homelinux.org/fedora/tangerine/tangerine-0.2.3-2.src.rpm * Fri May 26 2006 Brian Pepple - 0.2.3-2 - Add devel package. - Change BR from daap-sharp to daap-sharp-devel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 26 20:01:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 May 2006 16:01:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190939] Review Request: daap-sharp In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605262001.k4QK1J1C030208@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: daap-sharp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190939 bdpepple at ameritech.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at ameritech.net 2006-05-26 15:53 EST ------- Built for FC-5 & devel. Thanks for the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 26 20:01:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 May 2006 16:01:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190940] Review Request: tangerine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605262001.k4QK1WCo030244@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tangerine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190940 Bug 190940 depends on bug 190939, which changed state. Bug 190939 Summary: Review Request: daap-sharp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190939 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 26 20:07:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 May 2006 16:07:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193157] Review Request: system-config-selinux In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605262007.k4QK7ar3030391@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: system-config-selinux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193157 dennis at ausil.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dennis at ausil.us ------- Additional Comments From dennis at ausil.us 2006-05-26 15:59 EST ------- Trying to run system-config-selinux-0.0.3-1 # system-config-selinux Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/sbin/system-config-selinux", line 36, in ? import fcontextPage File "/usr/share/system-config-selinux/fcontextPage.py", line 26, in ? from avc import context ImportError: No module named avc looks like a missing requires -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 26 20:08:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 May 2006 16:08:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193154] Review Request: asymptote - Descriptive vector graphics language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605262008.k4QK84t9030417@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: asymptote - Descriptive vector graphics language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193154 ------- Additional Comments From gemi at bluewin.ch 2006-05-26 16:00 EST ------- (In reply to comment #9) > 1) please drop your patch because I have a better solution No, it was just a proposal, so there would be no need for the patch to configure. Patching configure can be annoying, since often a new patch must be created for a new version. > 2) you mention an configure option that I thought you had added (patch?) > Now that I have seen your specfile you don't even touch the configure > script or even override the configure macro default directories. > > Do you want me to drop the patch or not? Do whatever you prefer. You may package the asy-init.el file, these init files are normally not provided by upstream. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 26 20:19:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 May 2006 16:19:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191667] Review Request: poker-engine - Python library that implements poker rules In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605262019.k4QKJO11031150@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: poker-engine - Python library that implements poker rules https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191667 ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2006-05-26 16:11 EST ------- MUST ==== * rpmlint output: W: poker-engine-devel no-documentation This can be ignored since upstream doesn't provide developer documentation * Package and spec named appropriately * GPL license ok, license file included * Source matches upstream 23186d64a0ca1bcd22341355d6debc56 poker-engine-1.0.14.tar.gz * Spec file legible and in Am. English * No excessive BR: (though BR: rsync looks silly) * No Locales * No shared libs, headers, or libtool archives * pkgconfig file in -devel apckage * Not relocatable * No .desktop file needed * %{buildroot} cleaned where it ought to be * No duplicate %files * Builds in mock on FC4, FC5, and devel SHOULD ====== * Patch the configure script instead of running autoreconf in %prep QUESTIONS ========= * What's the difference between the xml files in /usr/share and /etc? MUSTFIX ======= * Missing Requires: rsync (for pokerconfigupgrade) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 26 20:22:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 May 2006 16:22:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 169703] Review Request: pari - Number Theory-oriented Computer Algebra System In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605262022.k4QKM0vB031641@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pari - Number Theory-oriented Computer Algebra System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=169703 ------- Additional Comments From gemi at bluewin.ch 2006-05-26 16:14 EST ------- Ok, build succeeded on FC-4, FC-5 and FC-6 excluding ppc. We should leave this bug open for now, a new bug can be opened only after pari is a bugzilla component. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 26 20:27:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 May 2006 16:27:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193157] Review Request: system-config-selinux In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605262027.k4QKRKxs032237@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: system-config-selinux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193157 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-05-26 16:19 EST ------- (In reply to comment #10) > Trying to run > system-config-selinux-0.0.3-1 > > # system-config-selinux > Traceback (most recent call last): > File "/usr/sbin/system-config-selinux", line 36, in ? > import fcontextPage > File "/usr/share/system-config-selinux/fcontextPage.py", line 26, in ? > from avc import context > ImportError: No module named avc > > looks like a missing requires I think policycoreutils should provide that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 26 20:38:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 May 2006 16:38:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 186327] Review Request: tcltls In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605262038.k4QKcfap000302@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tcltls https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=186327 ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2006-05-26 16:30 EST ------- (In reply to comment #40) > (In reply to comment #39) > I fixed all, except for "Group tag in the -devel subpackage", since rpmbuild > complains without it. > I decided to change the tcltls name to tcl-tls because i was just thinking about > that today, and i wanted to ask what was right, since in most other distros it > is tcltls (that's why i chose it initially) but for fedora's naming tcl-tls > seems most appropriate. In this case I think following the name used by other distros would be more appropriate. Please use tcltls instead of tcl-tls. After you make that change I'll APPROVE the package and we can move on to the next step. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 26 20:47:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 May 2006 16:47:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189268] Review Request: xscreensaver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605262047.k4QKla4W001056@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xscreensaver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189268 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-05-26 16:39 EST ------- I am now continuing to try uploading xscreensaver-5.00-1. I am now faced on a plague-client error, for which I might have to ask to mailing list. By the way, could you check my xscreensaver-4.24-3.2 if you want, Ray? I hope that this rpm can close 191769, 187892, 182552. I also removed rpmlint ERROR, and and applied some fixed already applied in xscreensaver-5.00. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 26 20:49:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 May 2006 16:49:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 186327] Review Request: tcltls In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605262049.k4QKnfjQ001224@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tcltls https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=186327 ------- Additional Comments From tjikkun at xs4all.nl 2006-05-26 16:42 EST ------- ok, name change reverted. http://amsn.hoentjen.eu/download/tcltls.spec http://amsn.hoentjen.eu/download/tcltls-1.5.0-10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 26 20:53:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 May 2006 16:53:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193191] Review Request: rename of notify-daemon to notification-daemon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605262053.k4QKrZp9001517@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rename of notify-daemon to notification-daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193191 ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-05-26 16:45 EST ------- NEEDSWORK: - Buildroot needs to follow guideline - BuildRequires: autconf automake - Fails to build in mock: checking for NOTIFICATION_DAEMON... configure: error: Package requirements ( gtk+-2.0 >= 2.4.0, glib-2.0 >= 2.4.0, dbus-1 >= 0.36, dbus-glib-1 >= 0.36, gconf-2.0, libwnck-1.0 ) were not met: No package 'libwnck-1.0' found. Also, the manual Requires, is this because rpm require checking isn't getting it right? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 26 20:55:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 May 2006 16:55:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193187] Review Request: pcsc-lite & ccid In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605262055.k4QKtuJE001650@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pcsc-lite & ccid https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193187 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2006-05-26 16:48 EST ------- Reading /etc/reader.conf.d/*.conf directly would be better, yes. The current implementation was submitted to me in PM (see Jul 31 2004 %changelog entry) and later sent to and adopted by upstream almost as-is. I bet upstream wouldn't mind a patch that makes pcscd take care of things itself. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 26 21:14:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 May 2006 17:14:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 186327] Review Request: tcltls In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605262114.k4QLEFAp002279@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tcltls https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=186327 wart at kobold.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778, 177841 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2006-05-26 17:06 EST ------- I double checked that the package still builds in mock. APPROVED I've updated your sponsored status so that you can now continue with the cvs import process. Don't hesitate to email me if you have any questions. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 26 21:55:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 May 2006 17:55:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191589] Review Request: qsa: Qt Script for Applications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605262155.k4QLtxtS004257@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qsa: Qt Script for Applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191589 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |193256 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 26 22:40:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 May 2006 18:40:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189892] Review Request: dssi - Disposable Soft Synth Interface In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605262240.k4QMeTxH005970@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dssi - Disposable Soft Synth Interface https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189892 ------- Additional Comments From green at redhat.com 2006-05-26 18:32 EST ------- (In reply to comment #7) > /* > * Copyright 2004 Chris Cannam, Steve Harris and Sean Bolton. > * > * Permission to use, copy, modify, distribute, and sell this software > * for any purpose is hereby granted without fee, provided that the > * above copyright notice and this permission notice are included in > * all copies or substantial portions of the software. > */ > > Does this count as BSD? Yes, basically, I think so. > So, my guess is dssi-devel should be "License: LGPL", dssi-examples should be > "License: Public Domain", and the main package "License: BSD/Public Domain" > however mock complains about that one. Maybe it can just be "Distributable". I think BSD trumps Public Domain, so I'm just making it BSD. New bits here: Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/green/FE/FC5/dssi.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/green/FE/FC5/dssi-0.9.1-4.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 26 23:01:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 May 2006 19:01:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192867] Review Request: ctorrent - BitTorrent Client written in C In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605262301.k4QN1bZx006811@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ctorrent - BitTorrent Client written in C https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192867 bdpepple at ameritech.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |bdpepple at ameritech.net OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 26 23:02:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 May 2006 19:02:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192876] Review Request: V2Strip ID3v2(Mp3 Files) tags remover In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605262302.k4QN2Med006868@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: V2Strip ID3v2(Mp3 Files) tags remover https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192876 bdpepple at ameritech.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |bdpepple at ameritech.net OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 26 23:17:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 May 2006 19:17:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193187] Review Request: pcsc-lite & ccid In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605262317.k4QNHYdt007159@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pcsc-lite & ccid https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193187 ------- Additional Comments From rrelyea at redhat.com 2006-05-26 19:09 EST ------- I'll update the release number. The 'noreplace' was just blindly following the Fedora package standards. I have no problem reverting it. Obviously the README is not part of the actual config. The whole /etc/reader.conf.d is really only used for serial readers (and other non-hot pluggable readers), which are getting more an more rare. I have no problem reverting that. Is /usr/sbin/update-reader.conf really run every time you start pcscd, or just when an appropriate reader package installs itself? The move of libpcsclite.so is for some pkcs #11 modules which dlopen libpcsclite.so. One other question Ville, why does pcsc-lite depend on ccid. pcsc-lite isn't useful without some reader, but it does start without one, and one can envision systems which have some other reader. It's not a big deal since most modern readers are ccid readers, so ccid support should be part of the base anyway. I didn't want to change that at this point without knowing the reason for it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 27 00:10:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 May 2006 20:10:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192867] Review Request: ctorrent - BitTorrent Client written in C In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605270010.k4R0AY6Z008849@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ctorrent - BitTorrent Client written in C https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192867 ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at ameritech.net 2006-05-26 20:02 EST ------- MD5Sums: 1bc787df91285a9cec8509617c3152d6 ctorrent-1.3.2.tar.gz Good: * Source URL is canonical * Upstream source tarball verified * Buildroot has all required elements * All necessary BuildRequires listed. * All desired features are enabled * Make succeeds even when %{_smp_mflags} is defined * Files have appropriate permissions and owners * Package builds fine in Mock. * Package installs and uninstalls cleanly on FC5. Bad: * Group Tag is not from official list. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/RPMGroups * Not all paths begin with macros. In the file section, '/usr/bin' should be replaced with '%{_bindir}'. Refer to http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/RPMMacros * We need to verify that the license is really GPL, since neither the tarball or the website mention the license at all. Minor: * rpmlint gives the following error, which is addressed in the first item of the Bad section: W: ctorrent non-standard-group Net * I wouldn't even bother to package the COPYING file, since it only contains the authors name and nothing else. The AUTHOR file contains the exact same information. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 27 00:45:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 May 2006 20:45:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193312] New: Review Request: Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193312 Summary: Review Request: Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: packages at amiga-hardware.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.dribble.org.uk/DevIL.spec SRPM URL: http://www.dribble.org.uk/DevIL-1.6.8-0.4.rc1.iss.src.rpm Description: Uploaded by request for review by Hans de Goede, pending sponsorship. Developer's Image Library (DevIL) is a programmer's library to develop applications with very powerful image loading capabilities, yet is easy for a developer to learn and use. Ultimate control of images is left to the developer, so unnecessary conversions, etc. are not performed. DevIL utilizes a simple, yet powerful, syntax. DevIL can load, save, convert, manipulate, filter and display a wide variety of image formats. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 27 00:46:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 May 2006 20:46:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193312] Review Request: In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605270046.k4R0keA9009962@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193312 packages at amiga-hardware.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: |library> AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 27 00:53:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 May 2006 20:53:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193312] Review Request: In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605270053.k4R0rGYP010238@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193312 ------- Additional Comments From packages at amiga-hardware.com 2006-05-26 20:45 EST ------- Note, rpmlint produces the following error (on i386 only but not x86_64 or ppc): E: DevIL shlib-with-non-pic-code /usr/lib/libILUT.so.1.0.0 This appears to be caused because the lib is linked against liballeg_unsharable.a but as mentioned rpmlint doesn't flag this when the RPM is built on x86_64 or ppc archs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 27 01:16:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 May 2006 21:16:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193154] Review Request: asymptote - Descriptive vector graphics language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605270116.k4R1GjBl010748@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: asymptote - Descriptive vector graphics language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193154 ------- Additional Comments From jpo at di.uminho.pt 2006-05-26 21:09 EST ------- > You may package the asy-init.el file, these init files are normally > not provided by upstream. Done. http://gsd.di.uminho.pt/jpo/software/fedora/asymptote.spec http://gsd.di.uminho.pt/jpo/software/fedora/asymptote-1.06-3.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 27 02:39:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 May 2006 22:39:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192889] Review Request: openais standards based cluster framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605270239.k4R2dHCg014041@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: openais standards based cluster framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192889 ------- Additional Comments From sdake at redhat.com 2006-05-26 22:31 EST ------- (In reply to comment #20) > (In reply to comment #19) > > (In reply to comment #18) > > > - Still shipping static libs > > > - Packages still contain unowned dirs > > > - Compilation still doesn't honor optflags > > > > > > Without having looked into details, packaging of dynamic libs/plugins seems to > > > be way off from any common conventions on Linux. > > > > > > > Thank you for your comments. Thank you for your comments and suggestions. I have modified the specfile and project as follows: * Indeed this time I believe I have the unowned dirs problem solved. * The static libraries have been removed from the RPM. * The devel libraries have been renamed library.so.1.0.0 with links from library.so and library.so.1 * The lcrso files have been moved to /usr/libexec/lcrso as this was suggested as a better location for the files. * optflags is now honored * all warnings related to optflags have been resolved and merged upstream The lcrso files (part of the main package) do not need a version number. They are not meant to be processed by ldconfig or other system utilities. The LCRSO system handles all versioning since it must handle live replacement while a process is active. Please find the new files at the following location: Spec URL: http://developer.osdl.org/dev/openais/SRPM/openais.spec SRPM URL: http://developer.osdl.org/dev/openais/SRPM/openais-0.76-1.1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 27 02:58:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 May 2006 22:58:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193187] Review Request: pcsc-lite & ccid In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605270258.k4R2wj4t015836@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pcsc-lite & ccid https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193187 ------- Additional Comments From notting at redhat.com 2006-05-26 22:50 EST ------- So, they're dlopening the unversioned .so symlink, and hoping it's the same ABI they're built against? That seems fragile. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 27 04:05:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 May 2006 00:05:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193216] Review Request: qcwebcam In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605270405.k4R45HOW018975@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qcwebcam https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193216 jpmahowald at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |jpmahowald at gmail.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2006-05-26 23:57 EST ------- Needs some work. * Use dist tag instead of coding release. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/DistTag * Should install into /usr/bin, not /usr/bin/local - Does the Makefile have an install target? - need to substitute out paths with macros * URL tag missing, does it have a web page? * Source tag is not a URL * Should change Requieres to BuildRequires on the devel packges. For example ImageMagick-devel * Doesn't build, probably missing BuildRequires gtk2-devel * Need to handle the .desktop file correctly. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines * %description should have "contains" not "contain" (Yes English is strange) And it is somewhat brief. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 27 04:55:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 May 2006 00:55:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188574] Review Request: rss-glx -- Really Slick Screensavers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605270455.k4R4tiM9020454@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rss-glx -- Really Slick Screensavers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188574 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-05-27 00:48 EST ------- OK, it builds fine and all of the hacks work under KDE. They still don't show up in xscreensaver-demo, but I believe that in order for that to work this package would have to patch /usr/share/X11/app-defaults/XScreenSaver to add the new hacks to *programs, which is probably a bad idea. I do still think these shouldn't live in /usr/bin, but as you say that's a choice made by upstream and you can indeed get useful behavior by running the hacks manually. (I have flying donuts in my root menu at the moment.) APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 27 05:12:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 May 2006 01:12:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191005] Review Request: glob2 - Realtime Strategy game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605270512.k4R5C3GZ020751@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glob2 - Realtime Strategy game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191005 ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2006-05-27 01:04 EST ------- Your files are no longer available, please get some real hosting. I'm sure someone on the mailing list could find some space for you to put them. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 27 05:18:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 May 2006 01:18:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191523] Review Request: perl-XML-Stream In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605270518.k4R5Ibqd020844@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-XML-Stream https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191523 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-05-27 01:10 EST ------- OK, everything looks good; the package builds fine without changes and the license issue is as clear as we can make it. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 27 07:00:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 May 2006 03:00:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193312] Review Request: In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605270700.k4R70Fh1023400@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193312 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-05-27 02:52 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > Note, rpmlint produces the following error (on i386 only but not x86_64 or ppc): > E: DevIL shlib-with-non-pic-code /usr/lib/libILUT.so.1.0.0 > > This appears to be caused because the lib is linked against > liballeg_unsharable.a but as mentioned rpmlint doesn't flag this when the RPM is > built on x86_64 or ppc archs. Yes this is a known problem when linking libraries with allegro, and also a _Real_ problem, SELinux will refuse to load libraries wich aren't 100% PIC these days. But as said this problem has been encountered and fixed before, the fix is relativly straight forward, see bug 185215 (adime review) and / or checkout adime's src.rpm. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 27 07:41:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 May 2006 03:41:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193319] New: Review Request: chestnut-dialer - A PPP dialing program Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193319 Summary: Review Request: chestnut-dialer - A PPP dialing program Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: lostclus at ua.fm QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://lostclus.linux.kiev.ua/files/chestnut-dialer.spec SRPM URL: http://lostclus.linux.kiev.ua/files/chestnut-dialer-0.3.2-2.src.rpm Description: Chestnut Dialer is PPP dialing program, written in Python. Many Internet providers, that provide dialup service, use PPP protocol; this program helps you to connect to Internet using a modem. Current version 0.3.2 can work with GTK2, QT, and without GUI (command line interface). Chestnut Dialer uses standard pppd daemon to set up network interface. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 27 07:47:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 May 2006 03:47:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193319] Review Request: chestnut-dialer - A PPP dialing program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605270747.k4R7lxBT026623@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: chestnut-dialer - A PPP dialing program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193319 ------- Additional Comments From lostclus at ua.fm 2006-05-27 03:40 EST ------- This is my first package, and I are seeking a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 27 08:24:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 May 2006 04:24:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190066] Review Request: php-pear-Mail In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605270824.k4R8OIw9029105@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Mail https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190066 Fedora at FamilleCollet.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 27 09:03:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 May 2006 05:03:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193187] Review Request: pcsc-lite & ccid In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605270903.k4R938sT031425@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pcsc-lite & ccid https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193187 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2006-05-27 04:55 EST ------- Yes, /usr/sbin/update-reader.conf is being run on every pcscd start, see start() in /etc/init.d/pcscd. pcsc-lite does not depend on ccid specifically. It depends on pcsc-ifd-handler, which is a "virtual" dependency, provided by packages that contain suitable drivers. In addition to ccid, in Extras it is provided by pcsc-lite-openct and (should be provided) by ctapi-cyberjack-pcsc, as well as number of other, mainly proprietary, driver packages elsewhere. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 27 09:46:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 May 2006 05:46:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193216] Review Request: qcwebcam In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605270946.k4R9kipB000514@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qcwebcam https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193216 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-05-27 05:39 EST ------- John, Please check SPEC file again at http://people.redhat.com/pnemade/Qcwebcam/qcwebcam.spec. I am getting error error: Bad file: /usr/src/redhat/SOURCES/Webcam.desktop: No such file or directory what changes should i do in SPEC file?? Also for using dist tag i saw onse statement on http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#head-beca3bf84972f19a384cc2e5091ed47c2b3cebc7 that NOTE: Fedora Core packages cannot use the %{?dist} tag as the current build system cannot handle it. So how to use dist in SPEC file? I tried but no value is substituted there and got blank space in src rpm name. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 27 09:52:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 May 2006 05:52:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190390] Review Request: AGReader: Console reader for viewing AmigaGuide files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605270952.k4R9qfr7000680@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: AGReader: Console reader for viewing AmigaGuide files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190390 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-05-27 05:45 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=130064) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=130064&action=view) Patch fixing gcc41 compile and all compiler warnings Ok, Attached is a patch fixing compiling with gcc4.1 and all compiler warnings. also I've removed the -s from the link command in the Makefile so that a proper -debuginfo package can be generated by rpmbuild. About the name, the name as is is fine, especially if you've already released rpms with the name like this. On to a full review: MUST: ===== 0 rpmlint output is: W: AGReader incoherent-version-in-changelog 1.1-7.iss 1.1-7 This needs fixing. * Package and spec file named appropriately * Packaged according to packaging guidelines * License (GPL) ok, license file not included because it isn't included by upstream * spec file is legible and in Am. English. * Source matches upstream * Compiles and builds on devel-x86_64 * BR: ok * No locales * No shared libraries * Not relocatable * Package owns / or requires all dirs * No duplicate files & Permissions ok * %clean & macro usage OK * Contains code only * %doc does not affect runtime, and isn't large enough to warrent a sub package * no -devel package needed, no libs / .la files. * no gui -> no .desktop file required MUST fix: ========= * Drop CC=gcc32 from make command params and instead use the attached patch * Add CFLAGS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS" to make command params so that the rpmoptflags get used during compilation. * Fix incoherent Changelog version. * Home, End, F1, F2, F3 Keys don't work as advertised in the manual, I've a fix and I'll attach a patch for this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 27 10:01:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 May 2006 06:01:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190390] Review Request: AGReader: Console reader for viewing AmigaGuide files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605271001.k4RA1ju9001060@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: AGReader: Console reader for viewing AmigaGuide files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190390 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-05-27 05:54 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=130065) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=130065&action=view) Patch fixing Home, End and Function keys -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 27 10:20:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 May 2006 06:20:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192867] Review Request: ctorrent - BitTorrent Client written in C In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605271020.k4RAKBpB001592@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ctorrent - BitTorrent Client written in C https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192867 ------- Additional Comments From bluekuja at ubuntu.com 2006-05-27 06:12 EST ------- Done, i fixed all errors listed above. http://www.netservers.org/packages/rpm/ctorrent.spec http://www.netservers.org/packages/rpm/ctorrent-1.3.2-3.src.rpm The license is GPL, I'm sure about it. The author have written a presentation of his program on a Debian list and he writes that license is GPL. Anyway i've found some more websites that confirm this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 27 10:43:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 May 2006 06:43:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193216] Review Request: qcwebcam In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605271043.k4RAhsQi002322@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qcwebcam https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193216 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-05-27 06:36 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > John, > Please check SPEC file again at > http://people.redhat.com/pnemade/Qcwebcam/qcwebcam.spec. I am getting error > error: Bad file: /usr/src/redhat/SOURCES/Webcam.desktop: No such file or directory The file Webcam.desktop was missing from the RPM SOURCES directory. This shouldn't happen if you're building from the SRPM, which contains this file. > what changes should i do in SPEC file?? I'd suggest reading the packaging guidelines here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines It doesn't cover everything here though. In particular, RPM packages should not install anything under /usr/local - you need to change the install step to put files under /usr instead. > Also for using dist tag i saw onse statement on > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#head-beca3bf84972f19a384cc2e5091ed47c2b3cebc7 > that NOTE: Fedora Core packages cannot use the %{?dist} tag as the current build > system cannot handle it. This is a Fedora Extras package submission, not a Fedora Core one. The Fedora Extras build system (which will soon be used for Fedora Core anyway) handles the dist tag just fine. > So how to use dist in SPEC file? Exactly as it says on the wiki. I tried but no value is substituted there > and got blank space in src rpm name. The macros will defined automatically in the Fedora Extras build system, and you can try this for yourself by building your package in mock. See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Projects/Mock You could alternatively define the macros manually when you build the package: $ rpmbuild --define "fedora 5" --define "dist .fc5" ... I see there is another project called qcwebcam: http://www.fhttpd.org/pub/qcwebcam/README.html This could cause confusion... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 27 11:00:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 May 2006 07:00:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193154] Review Request: asymptote - Descriptive vector graphics language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605271100.k4RB0Y1j002765@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: asymptote - Descriptive vector graphics language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193154 gemi at bluewin.ch changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |gemi at bluewin.ch OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From gemi at bluewin.ch 2006-05-27 06:53 EST ------- * package naming: ok * license good and included: ok * spec file layout: ok * source md5: ok * builds in mock/i386: ok * buildreq: ok * no locales * owns all directories it creates: ok * correct use of $RPM_BUILD_ROOT: ok * documentation in the right place: ok * no header files or shared libraries * no desktop file * works as expected on examples: ok * triggers generate warnings by rpmlint: ignore ? group tag is Development/Tools I suggest Applications/Publishing in analog to tetex (and metapost) APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 27 12:38:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 May 2006 08:38:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189268] Review Request: xscreensaver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605271238.k4RCcM4V005110@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xscreensaver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189268 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-05-27 08:30 EST ------- This time, I could upload my src.rpm. Then I tried to rebuild it but it failed perhaps because development repomd.xml seems to be broken currently. I re-try to rebuild when repomd problem is solved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 27 12:45:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 May 2006 08:45:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187430] Review Request: elektra In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605271245.k4RCjQnm005587@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: elektra https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187430 ------- Additional Comments From avi at unix.sh 2006-05-27 08:37 EST ------- Please try the new src.rpm from http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/elektra/elektra-0.6.1-31.src.rpm (In reply to comment #25) > blockers: > * changelog > * source not found > * .so for libelekra should be in a devel package All three points fixed. > rpmlint output: > W: elektra incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.6.1-3 0.6.1-30 > E: elektra invalid-soname /lib/libelektra-filesys.so libelektra-filesys.so > E: elektra invalid-soname /lib/libelektra-fstab.so libelektra-fstab.so > W: elektra wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding > /usr/share/doc/elektra-0.6.1/standards/signature.xml > W: elektra devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/libelektratools.so > W: elektra devel-file-in-non-devel-package /lib/libelektra.so > W: elektra devel-file-in-non-devel-package /lib/libelektra-default.so > E: elektra script-without-shellbang > /usr/share/doc/elektra-0.6.1/scripts/convert-hwconfKudzu All coherent messages fixed. > other comments: > * --prefix=%{_prefix} and --exec-prefix=/ were unneeded in my tests This is correct. If removed, software won't be installed in /bin and /lib > * The redundant %doc line is not needed in devel subpackage: > %doc AUTHORS COPYING ChangeLog README INSTALL Removed. The key.3.gz conflict was also removed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 27 12:48:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 May 2006 08:48:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193319] Review Request: chestnut-dialer - A PPP dialing program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605271248.k4RCmEp3005759@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: chestnut-dialer - A PPP dialing program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193319 bdpepple at ameritech.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 27 12:55:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 May 2006 08:55:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192867] Review Request: ctorrent - BitTorrent Client written in C In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605271255.k4RCtnWW006020@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ctorrent - BitTorrent Client written in C https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192867 ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at ameritech.net 2006-05-27 08:48 EST ------- You've still got a problem with the %file section. Looks like you changed '/usr/bin/ctorrent' to just '%{_bindir}'. It needs to be '%{_bindir}/ctorrent' or '%{_bindir}/%{name}' -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 27 13:34:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 May 2006 09:34:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190390] Review Request: AGReader: Console reader for viewing AmigaGuide files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605271334.k4RDYAXm006985@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: AGReader: Console reader for viewing AmigaGuide files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190390 ------- Additional Comments From packages at amiga-hardware.com 2006-05-27 09:26 EST ------- Many thanks for the patches Hans. Here's the latest spec and srpm which should fix those issues. http://www.dribble.org.uk/AGReader.spec http://www.dribble.org.uk/AGReader-1.1-8.src.rpm I'll also try and submit those patches upstream. I'm working this weekend, but will get on with the other two rpms asap. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 27 13:45:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 May 2006 09:45:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193110] Review Request: python-sexy In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605271345.k4RDjJUw007705@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-sexy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193110 ------- Additional Comments From karlthered at gmail.com 2006-05-27 09:37 EST ------- Thanks for your pieces of advice. I uploaded new spec and srpm: http://darkenphoenix.free.fr/RPMS/RPMS/Extras/SRPMS/python-sexy-0.1.8-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 27 13:46:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 May 2006 09:46:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193281] Review Request: python-xmpp - Python library for easy scripting with Jabber In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605271346.k4RDkbPo007791@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-xmpp - Python library for easy scripting with Jabber https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193281 ------- Additional Comments From gauret at free.fr 2006-05-27 09:39 EST ------- I get a 404 error on both links... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 27 13:52:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 May 2006 09:52:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191538] Review Request: qsynth - Qt based Fluidsynth GUI front end In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605271352.k4RDq4fK008118@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qsynth - Qt based Fluidsynth GUI front end https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191538 bugs.michael at gmx.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |189886 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 27 13:52:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 May 2006 09:52:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189886] Review Request: FluidSynth - Real-time software synthesizer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605271352.k4RDq5pF008131@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: FluidSynth - Real-time software synthesizer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189886 bugs.michael at gmx.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |191538 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 27 14:01:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 May 2006 10:01:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193154] Review Request: asymptote - Descriptive vector graphics language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605271401.k4RE1x0U008570@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: asymptote - Descriptive vector graphics language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193154 ------- Additional Comments From jpo at di.uminho.pt 2006-05-27 09:54 EST ------- (In reply to comment #12) > ... > ? group tag is Development/Tools > I suggest Applications/Publishing in analog to tetex (and metapost) Done. > APPROVED Thanks for the review. Do you mind if I send the emacs init file upstream? jpo -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 27 14:12:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 May 2006 10:12:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193210] Review Request: htmldoc - Convert HTML source files into HTML, PostScript, or PDF In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605271412.k4RECAfa008756@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: htmldoc - Convert HTML source files into HTML, PostScript, or PDF https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193210 ------- Additional Comments From gauret at free.fr 2006-05-27 10:04 EST ------- * No downloadable source. Please give the full URL in the Source tag, which should be http://ftp.easysw.com/pub/htmldoc/1.8.26/htmldoc-1.8.26-source.tar.bz2 (ok, that one was kind of hard to find...) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 27 14:12:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 May 2006 10:12:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193210] Review Request: htmldoc - Convert HTML source files into HTML, PostScript, or PDF In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605271412.k4RECo0w008794@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: htmldoc - Convert HTML source files into HTML, PostScript, or PDF https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193210 gauret at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |gauret at free.fr CC|gauret at free.fr | OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 27 14:40:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 May 2006 10:40:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193281] Review Request: python-xmpp - Python library for easy scripting with Jabber In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605271440.k4REeT2e009640@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-xmpp - Python library for easy scripting with Jabber https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193281 ------- Additional Comments From jeff at ollie.clive.ia.us 2006-05-27 10:32 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > I get a 404 error on both links... Oops... forgot that i had reorganized the directories on my web server and I uploaded them to the wrong spot... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 27 14:41:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 May 2006 10:41:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189884] Review Request: LASH Audio Session Handler In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605271441.k4REf7MG009710@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: LASH Audio Session Handler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189884 ------- Additional Comments From bugs.michael at gmx.net 2006-05-27 10:33 EST ------- * Build failure: make[2]: Entering directory `/home/qa/tmp/rpm/BUILD/lash-0.5.1/lashd' test -z "/usr/bin" || mkdir -p -- "/home/qa/tmp/rpm/tmp/lash-0.5.1-1-root-qa/usr/bin" /bin/sh ../libtool --mode=install /usr/bin/install -c 'lashd' '/home/qa/tmp/rpm/tmp/lash-0.5.1-1-root-qa/usr/bin/lashd' libtool: install: warning: `../liblash/liblash.la' has not been installed in `/usr/lib' /usr/bin/install -c .libs/lashd /home/qa/tmp/rpm/tmp/lash-0.5.1-1-root-qa/usr/bin/lashd if ! grep -q ^lash /etc/services; then \ echo -e "\nlash\t\t14541/tcp\t\t\t# LASH client/server protocol" >> /etc/services; \ fi /bin/sh: /etc/services: Permission denied * Configure warning: (would be "BuildRequires: texi2html") checking for texi2html... no configure: WARNING: texi2html not found, manual will not be built * Wrong "BuildRequires: tetex" * pkgconfig file contains hardcoded rpath linker options * Missing -devel package "Requires" for at least jack and alsa (see pkgconfig file) -devel packages, and e2fsprogs-devel (see installed C headers) * Don't install the .la libtool archive file unless you like libtool dependency hell * Use %_infodir instead of %_datadir/info/ * Add "rm -f %{buildroot}%{_infodir}/dir" at end of %install section * Install info files with install-info: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/ScriptletSnippets -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 27 15:02:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 May 2006 11:02:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189886] Review Request: FluidSynth - Real-time software synthesizer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605271502.k4RF2UGT010549@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: FluidSynth - Real-time software synthesizer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189886 ------- Additional Comments From lostclus at ua.fm 2006-05-27 10:54 EST ------- Unnecessary build dependence e2fsprogs-devel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 27 15:27:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 May 2006 11:27:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193210] Review Request: htmldoc - Convert HTML source files into HTML, PostScript, or PDF In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605271527.k4RFRihk010937@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: htmldoc - Convert HTML source files into HTML, PostScript, or PDF https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193210 ------- Additional Comments From adam at spicenitz.org 2006-05-27 11:20 EST ------- Thank you for your comment. I have created a new package here: http://www.spicenitz.org/fedora/htmldoc-1.8.26-2.src.rpm http://www.spicenitz.org/fedora/htmldoc.spec I used %{name} and %{version} in the Source tag. Is that ok, or should I have put the URL in directly? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 27 15:42:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 May 2006 11:42:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193240] Review Request: XaraLX - Vector/general purpose graphics utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605271542.k4RFgaft011485@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: XaraLX - Vector/general purpose graphics utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193240 gemi at bluewin.ch changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |gemi at bluewin.ch ------- Additional Comments From gemi at bluewin.ch 2006-05-27 11:34 EST ------- Does not build in mock: "autoreconf: failed to run autopoint: No such file or directory" Needs BuildReq: gettext-devel -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 27 15:55:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 May 2006 11:55:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192867] Review Request: ctorrent - BitTorrent Client written in C In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605271555.k4RFtjjc012033@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ctorrent - BitTorrent Client written in C https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192867 ------- Additional Comments From bluekuja at ubuntu.com 2006-05-27 11:48 EST ------- ops yes, my mistake sorry. Anyway fixed now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 27 16:17:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 May 2006 12:17:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192867] Review Request: ctorrent - BitTorrent Client written in C In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605271617.k4RGHcOE012304@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ctorrent - BitTorrent Client written in C https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192867 bdpepple at ameritech.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at ameritech.net 2006-05-27 12:10 EST ------- +1 APPROVE. Fixed errors noted in comment #7. I'll also be your sponser. It looks like your next step is: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/Contributors#head-a89c07b5b8abe7748b6b39f0f89768d595234907 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 27 17:04:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 May 2006 13:04:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193187] Review Request: pcsc-lite & ccid In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605271704.k4RH49sS013848@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pcsc-lite & ccid https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193187 ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-05-27 12:56 EST ------- A conf file in /usr/sbin just seems a bit um... not cool. Is there any way to put this somewhere else? /etc/sysconfig/ ? /etc/ ? /usr/share/ ? Somewhere that isn't /usr/sbin... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 27 17:29:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 May 2006 13:29:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193312] Review Request: In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605271729.k4RHTsl3014441@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193312 ------- Additional Comments From packages at amiga-hardware.com 2006-05-27 13:22 EST ------- Here's the new spec and srpm which includes a patch to fix the pic problem. http://www.dribble.org.uk/DevIL.spec http://www.dribble.org.uk/DevIL-1.6.8-0.5.rc1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 27 18:13:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 May 2006 14:13:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193342] New: Review Request: Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193342 Summary: Review Request: Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: packages at amiga-hardware.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://dribble.org.uk/cegui.spec SRPM URL: http://dribble.org.uk/cegui-0.4.1-2.src.rpm Description: Package uploaded for review by Hans de Goede Crazy Eddie's GUI System is a free library providing windowing and widgets for graphics APIs / engines where such functionality is not natively available, or severely lacking. The library is object orientated, written in C++, and targeted at games developers who should be spending their time creating great games, not building GUI sub-systems! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 27 18:16:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 May 2006 14:16:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193342] Review Request: In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605271816.k4RIG8vP015542@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193342 packages at amiga-hardware.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: |APIs / engines> AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 27 18:22:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 May 2006 14:22:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193187] Review Request: pcsc-lite & ccid In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605271822.k4RIMYLH015979@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pcsc-lite & ccid https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193187 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2006-05-27 14:15 EST ------- /usr/sbin/update-reader.conf is not a config file, it's a shell script which creates /etc/reader.conf from the contents of /etc/reader.conf.d/*.conf. Yes, I did nag to upstream about the potentially confusing name of the script... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 27 18:54:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 May 2006 14:54:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 181599] Review Request: gallery2: web based photo album software In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605271854.k4RIsqKD018587@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gallery2: web based photo album software https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=181599 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-05-27 14:47 EST ------- I just did the following steps: - removed all gallery packages. - rm -rf /srv/gallery2 - rm -rf /var/www/gallery2 - removed all users from mysql. - dropped all mysql db's. - Reinstalled the 0.17 gallery rpms. - Went thru the install steps for single site. Then tried multi site. I got the same error both times in step 8... Warning: fopen(/srv/gallery2/locks/0/1/1) [function.fopen]: failed to open stream: No such file or directory in /var/www/gallery2/modules/core/classes/GalleryPlatform.class on line 369 Any ideas? I can try later on a devel/rawhide machine. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 27 20:20:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 May 2006 16:20:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 181599] Review Request: gallery2: web based photo album software In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605272020.k4RKKkeO020881@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gallery2: web based photo album software https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=181599 ------- Additional Comments From jwb at redhat.com 2006-05-27 16:13 EST ------- I have no idea. I've tried the -17 packages on FC5 and FC3 and both have worked; I've pasted the error to upstream and asked if they have any ideas. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 27 20:36:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 May 2006 16:36:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192577] Review Request: perl-OpenFrame In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605272036.k4RKa8od021477@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-OpenFrame https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192577 ------- Additional Comments From steve at silug.org 2006-05-27 16:28 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > Only one of the files (lib/OpenFrame/Argument/Blob.pm) seems to have a statement > of the license. I don't think that's enough to suggest the license for the > entire package. I've emailed the author (the one listed in that file anyway) for clarification. > I wonder about the need for these: > > Requires: perl(File::Type) >= 0.01 > Requires: perl(HTTP::Request) >= 0.01 > Requires: perl(IO::Null) >= 0.01 > > The versions are so low that they seem to have been put in as placeholders. RPM > should figure out all of these on its own. (It doesn't find HTTP::Request but > it does find other modules, all provided by perl-libwww-perl.) Fixed in -2. > t/02http_request....[OpenFrame::Segment::HTTP::Response::OpenFrame::Segment::HTTP::Response::dispatch] > no response available > at /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/Pipeline/Dispatch.pm line 74 > ok [...] > I'm not sure if the first is a mock artifact or a problem with the test suite. It happens when I'm not running under mock either. > t/98compile.........skipped > all skipped: - do not have File::Find::Rule installed [...] > The second is fixed up with the obvious BR:. Also fixed in -2. http://ftp.kspei.com/pub/steve/rpms/perl-OpenFrame-3.05-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 27 21:05:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 May 2006 17:05:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 183912] Review Request: jack-audio-connection-kit - The Jack Audio Connection Kit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605272105.k4RL5F8U023615@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jack-audio-connection-kit - The Jack Audio Connection Kit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183912 ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2006-05-27 16:57 EST ------- (In reply to comment #53) > John, I've done register as fedora membership, but cvsextras group is unapproved > for me now. What do I need to do? I've approved your cvsextras. You now may setup your client, import, and build. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 27 21:49:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 May 2006 17:49:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193380] New: Review Request: hardinfo Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193380 Summary: Review Request: hardinfo Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: splinux25 at gmail.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://glive.tuxfamily.org/fedora/hardinfo/hardinfo.spec SRPM URL: http://glive.tuxfamily.org/fedora/hardinfo/hardinfo-0.4-1.fc6.src.rpm Description: HardInfo is a system profiler for Linux systems. It can display information about the hardware, software, and perform simple benchmarks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 27 22:27:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 May 2006 18:27:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193380] Review Request: hardinfo In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605272227.k4RMRTaq026162@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hardinfo https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193380 gemi at bluewin.ch changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: hardinfo |Review Request: hardinfo CC| |gemi at bluewin.ch ------- Additional Comments From gemi at bluewin.ch 2006-05-27 18:19 EST ------- * Needed BuildRequires: which, pciutils * There is no documentation in the source file, not even a license file. Upstream should be notified about this. * Shared object files must not reside in %{_datadir}/hardinfo, they must go to %{_libdir}/hardinfo. If necessary you need to patch the source code. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 27 22:34:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 May 2006 18:34:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193342] Review Request: In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605272234.k4RMYOGO026341@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193342 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-05-27 18:26 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=130112) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=130112&action=view) Patch making cegui use the system pcre cegui comes with its own copy of pcre. Which is a library which is also available seperatly in FE. Using private copies of libraries is concidered a bad practice (it removes / reverts most advantages of using shared libs if there are many copies of each lib in different packages). Please do a rm -fr src/pcre in %prep, add pcre-devel to the BR and use the attached patch to get cegui to compile with the system pcre. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 28 00:17:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 May 2006 20:17:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189886] Review Request: FluidSynth - Real-time software synthesizer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605280017.k4S0HkZV030473@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: FluidSynth - Real-time software synthesizer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189886 ------- Additional Comments From green at redhat.com 2006-05-27 20:10 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > Unnecessary build dependence e2fsprogs-devel. Thanks. Fixed. Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/green/FE/FC5/fluidsynth.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/green/FE/FC5/fluidsynth-1.0.7a-4.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 28 00:45:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 May 2006 20:45:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 181599] Review Request: gallery2: web based photo album software In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605280045.k4S0jCxr031271@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gallery2: web based photo album software https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=181599 ------- Additional Comments From tjb at unh.edu 2006-05-27 20:37 EST ------- I ran into this problem configuring for multisite when I tried out the earlier RPMS. The problem for me seemed to be that no matter what I put in for the data directory (the non web accessible data area), after the config file was written, it had a different (i.e., not the one I specified) /srv based data directory. After the config file writing step I had to edit the just written config file to point to the correct data directory or else I would get the same error on the next step when the install procedure copied over the files to the new multisite. Hopefully not to obtuse... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 28 01:40:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 May 2006 21:40:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193342] Review Request: In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605280140.k4S1eltq000525@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193342 ------- Additional Comments From packages at amiga-hardware.com 2006-05-27 21:33 EST ------- Thanks very much for the patch. I had to make a tiny change to it, because it introduced the following trivial error: src/Makefile.am:151: noinst_HEADERS must be set with `=' before using `+=' Does this also apply to the private copy of lua include with the source package? I suspect it probably does, although there's no shared libs in the FE lua. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 28 02:47:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 May 2006 22:47:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191540] Review Request: perl-Net-XMPP In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605280247.k4S2lMsj002330@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-XMPP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191540 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-05-27 22:39 EST ------- This fails to build in mock due to the test suite; some tests are automatically skipped but t/roster dies: t/roster.................Cannot resolve compute20.math.uh.edu: at /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/XML/Stream.pm line 406. # Looks like you planned 75 tests but only ran 1. # Looks like your test died just after 1. dubious Test returned status 255 (wstat 65280, 0xff00) DIED. FAILED tests 2-75 Failed 74/75 tests, 1.33% okay Failed Test Stat Wstat Total Fail Failed List of Failed ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- t/roster.t 255 65280 75 148 197.33% 2-75 8 subtests skipped. Failed 1/11 test scripts, 90.91% okay. 74/650 subtests failed, 88.62% okay. BR: perl is redundant, but not a blocker. I've disabled the tests for the purposes of this review. Since the only issue is that you need to disable the test suite in order to build, I'll go ahead and approve and you can fix it when you check in. Review: * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * dist tag is present. * license field matches the actual licenses * license is open source-compatible. Text of all licenses included in package. * source files match upstream: 6338484aa0d394e68c01666ca34e5241 Net-XMPP-1.0.tar.gz 6338484aa0d394e68c01666ca34e5241 Net-XMPP-1.0.tar.gz-srpm * latest version is being packaged. O BuildRequires are proper (perl is redundant). O package builds in mock (development, x86_64) once test suite is disabled. * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: perl(Net::XMPP) = 1.0 perl(Net::XMPP::Client) perl(Net::XMPP::Connection) perl(Net::XMPP::Debug) perl(Net::XMPP::IQ) perl(Net::XMPP::JID) perl(Net::XMPP::Message) perl(Net::XMPP::Namespaces) perl(Net::XMPP::Presence) perl(Net::XMPP::PrivacyLists) perl(Net::XMPP::Protocol) perl(Net::XMPP::Roster) perl(Net::XMPP::Stanza) perl-Net-XMPP = 1.0-4.fc6 - perl >= 0:5.003 perl >= 0:5.005 perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8) perl(Authen::SASL) perl(Carp) perl(Digest::SHA1) perl(FileHandle) perl(MIME::Base64) perl(Net::XMPP::Client) perl(Net::XMPP::Connection) perl(Net::XMPP::Debug) perl(Net::XMPP::IQ) perl(Net::XMPP::JID) perl(Net::XMPP::Message) perl(Net::XMPP::Namespaces) perl(Net::XMPP::Presence) perl(Net::XMPP::PrivacyLists) perl(Net::XMPP::Protocol) perl(Net::XMPP::Roster) perl(Net::XMPP::Stanza) perl(POSIX) perl(Time::Local) perl(XML::Stream) >= 1.22 perl(base) perl(strict) perl(vars) * no shared libraries are present. * package is not relocatable. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * %clean is present. O %check is present but must be disabled for mock builds. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no libtool .la droppings. * not a GUI app. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 28 03:00:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 May 2006 23:00:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191545] Review Request: perl-Net-Jabber In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605280300.k4S30BBJ002619@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-Jabber https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191545 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |tibbs at math.uh.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 28 04:46:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 May 2006 00:46:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193240] Review Request: XaraLX - Vector/general purpose graphics utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605280446.k4S4khYq004971@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: XaraLX - Vector/general purpose graphics utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193240 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2006-05-28 00:38 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > Does not build in mock: > "autoreconf: failed to run autopoint: No such file or directory" > Needs BuildReq: gettext-devel You should not run autoreconf in specs - You should use patches. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 28 08:08:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 May 2006 04:08:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193210] Review Request: htmldoc - Convert HTML source files into HTML, PostScript, or PDF In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605280808.k4S88icb011764@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: htmldoc - Convert HTML source files into HTML, PostScript, or PDF https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193210 ------- Additional Comments From gauret at free.fr 2006-05-28 04:01 EST ------- Using %{name} and %{version} in the Source tag is up to you. Some packagers prefer using it, to avoid changing it at every new release, and some packagers prefer the expanded form, to be able to quickly copy'n'paste into wget. Do what you prefer. You have a desktop file already available in the desktop subfolder, please use it. However, you'll have to add --remove-category=X-Red-Hat-Base to desktop-file-install, since we don't use it anymore. The menu entry lacks an icon, please copy the png files in desktop to the proper place in /usr/share/icons/hicolor/*/apps. (don't forget you'll have to add some bits to the scriptlets, see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/ScriptletSnippets, "GTK+ icon cache") -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 28 09:09:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 May 2006 05:09:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193271] Review Request: python-dns - DNS toolkit for Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605280909.k4S99HPI031283@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-dns - DNS toolkit for Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193271 gauret at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |gauret at free.fr OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From gauret at free.fr 2006-05-28 05:01 EST ------- Review for release 1: * RPM name is OK * Source dnspython-1.3.5.tar.gz is the same as upstream * Builds fine in mock * rpmlint looks OK * File list looks OK * Works fine APPROVED Minor: * Use of buildroot is not consistant. (wiki: PackagingGuidelines#UsingBuildRootOptFlags) Please change your occurence of %{buildroot} in %check into $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 28 09:09:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 May 2006 05:09:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193281] Review Request: python-xmpp - Python library for easy scripting with Jabber In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605280909.k4S99qPv031335@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-xmpp - Python library for easy scripting with Jabber https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193281 gauret at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |gauret at free.fr OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From gauret at free.fr 2006-05-28 05:02 EST ------- Review for release 1: * RPM name is OK * Source xmpppy-0.3.1.tar.gz is the same as upstream * This is the latest version * Builds fine in mock * rpmlint looks OK * File list looks OK * Works fine APPROVED (Extremely) minor nitpick: * usually "find doc -type f | xargs chmod a-x" is done in %prep, since it is about "preparing the sources for the rest of the build". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 28 09:35:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 May 2006 05:35:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193319] Review Request: chestnut-dialer - A PPP dialing program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605280935.k4S9Zmjq031867@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: chestnut-dialer - A PPP dialing program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193319 ------- Additional Comments From lostclus at ua.fm 2006-05-28 05:28 EST ------- Spec URL: http://lostclus.linux.kiev.ua/files/chestnut-dialer.spec SRPM URL: http://lostclus.linux.kiev.ua/files/chestnut-dialer-0.3.2-3.src.rpm Changes: - Don't use autoreconf in spec file, use patch instead - Remove %{_infodir}/dir after install -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 28 10:15:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 May 2006 06:15:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193216] Review Request: qcwebcam In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605281015.k4SAFALO000949@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qcwebcam https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193216 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-05-28 06:07 EST ------- I hope i have completed all work except package name change. Will think on that and change it accordingly. Current working SPEC file Url: http://people.redhat.com/pnemade/Qcwebcam/qcwebcam.spec Current working Source file Url: http://people.redhat.com/pnemade/Qcwebcam/qcwebcam-1.1.tar.bz2 SRPM Url: http://people.redhat.com/pnemade/Qcwebcam/qcwebcam-1.1-3.fc5.src.rpm Can you check all above things are working fine or not?? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 28 10:17:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 May 2006 06:17:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190390] Review Request: AGReader: Console reader for viewing AmigaGuide files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605281017.k4SAHxXI000984@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: AGReader: Console reader for viewing AmigaGuide files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190390 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #130065|0 |1 is obsolete| | ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-05-28 06:10 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=130155) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=130155&action=view) Patch fixing Home, End and Function keys Yesterday I realised after leaving my PC, that I forgot to add the escape sequences used by the function keys under the Linux Console, so here is a new version of the patch which adds the esc-sequences for the Function keys under the console. So now the function keys for this console ag reader not only work under xterm but also actually on the console :). Please use this version of the patch to build a new SRPM before importing into CVS, or replace the patch immidiatly after import (iow before building). The new version looks good, Approved! I'll set the status to FE-ACCEPTED as soon as the other 2 are approved too and you get your CVS access, otherwise this one my stay FE-ACCEPTED for a couple of days without being imported into CVS, which will make the automated weekly FE-status reports unhappy. Talking about the automated weekly FE-status reports, for these reports it is important that the Summary of a review bug is always in the form of: Review Request: %name - %summary So not %name: %summary, please change the summary of this bug, the same goes for the DevIL and cegui bugs, which are even more wrong with the <> added. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 28 13:23:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 May 2006 09:23:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191592] Review Request: vorbisgain - Adds tags to Ogg Vorbis files to adjust the volume In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605281323.k4SDNNVi005742@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vorbisgain - Adds tags to Ogg Vorbis files to adjust the volume https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191592 noa at resare.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE Fixed In Version| |0.34-2.fc5 ------- Additional Comments From noa at resare.com 2006-05-28 09:15 EST ------- Yup. And it seems to work also :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 28 13:34:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 May 2006 09:34:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189268] Review Request: xscreensaver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605281334.k4SDYo3S005900@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xscreensaver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189268 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-05-28 09:27 EST ------- Umm..... As I posted to FE mailing list, buildsys for FE-devel seems to be broken for more than a day. The jobs which were queued to FE-devel buildsys within a day ago ALL FAILED. All the queue (not only by me but also for the other packages by other packagers) left empty build.log and root.log complains like: Cannot open/read repomd.xml file for repository: core failure: repodata/repomd.xml from core: [Errno 256] No more mirrors to try. For my job, the queue results are in http://buildsys.fedoraproject.org/logs/fedora-development-extras/10000-xscreensaver-5.00-1.fc6/ Jesse, is this related to your comment in https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-announce-list/2006-May/msg00010.html and the discussion starting from https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2006-May/msg00797.html ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 28 13:37:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 May 2006 09:37:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 178162] Review Request: libgeotiff In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605281337.k4SDbl7Q006062@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgeotiff https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=178162 ------- Additional Comments From che666 at gmail.com 2006-05-28 09:30 EST ------- latest geotiff release is 1.2.3 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 28 13:40:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 May 2006 09:40:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193312] Review Request: In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605281340.k4SDeapE006268@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193312 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-05-28 09:33 EST ------- MUST: ===== * rpmlint output clean * Package and spec file named appropriately * Packaged according to packaging guidelines * License (LGPL) ok, license file included * spec file is legible and in Am. English. * Source matches upstream * Compiles and builds on devel-x86_64 * BR: redundant (see below) * No locales * ldconfig properly called for shared libraries * Not relocatable * Package owns / or requires all dirs * No duplicate files (except for %doc) & Permissions ok * %clean & macro usage OK * Contains code only * %doc does not affect runtime, and isn't large enough to warrent a sub package * -devel package as needed * .a and .la files removed * no gui -> no .desktop file required MUST fix: ========= * (Build)Requires: xorg-x11-devel . This is for non modular X, your package will however be initially imported and build for the -devel branch which uses modular X. Luckily this can be easily fixed: -The BR can be dropped completly, see should fix below. -The Requires for the -devel package should be: Requires: allegro-devel libGL-devel libGLU-devel Because GL/gl.h and GL/glu.h are the "X11" headers used by DevIL's headers. libGL-devel and libGlu-devel are virtual provides and should work on FC4-devel * Don't include the same docs in the -devel package again -devel Requires the main package and as such the docs will already be available. I know this makes rpmlint issue a warning, which should be ignored. * DevIL-devel contains an autoconf generated config.h, this is a problem, because if other packages contain one too then there will be #define colissions and other unpleasant-ness. I've checked things and this file is used by, ilut.h which checks the following defines: #define ILUT_USE_ALLEGRO #define ILUT_USE_OPENGL #define ILUT_USE_SDL The easiest and best way to fix this is to replace config.h with a file containing just these 3 lines and nothing else at the end of %install. An alternative would be to completly remove config.h and patch ilut.h to include these 3 lines instead of the #include IL/config.h line. But that could break compilation of software which wants to include IL/config.h directly. Other software building against DevIL, might check for some the other defines in config.h, but then that software is broken and we will need to fix the other software as we go. I don't think that is a very likely scenario though. * In %install you manually install ilu_internal.h because that is needed by ilu_region.h, this is however not the correct fix, the correct fix is to patch or sed ilu_region.h to include IL/il.h instead of ilu_internal.h as il.h contains all the nescesarry things ilu_region.h needs. Should fix: =========== * In %changelog you write: - Made zlib-devel and xorg-x11-devel explicit buildrequires Please don't unless you've got a very good reason for this, this goed directly against the Packaging Guidelines! * Add an all lowercase same name Provides to both the base and sub-package as discussed on f-e-l (this is a should fix because it isn't in the guidelines yet, but it will most likely be in the guidelines soon. Example for the base: Provides: devil = %{version}-%{release} * Change the Source0 URL to: http://download.sourceforge.net/openil/%{name}-%{version}-RC1-src.tar.gz This is the generic sf donwload site which is prefered to using a specific mirror as you have, mirrors sometimes come and go. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 28 13:42:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 May 2006 09:42:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193312] Review Request: In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605281342.k4SDghBc006438@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193312 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-05-28 09:34 EST ------- p.s. I don't think I will have time today to take a good look at cegui, hopefully I can find some time before the next weekend, otherwise it will have to wait till next week. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 28 14:00:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 May 2006 10:00:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192144] Review Request: musicbox In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605281400.k4SE0S5s006971@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: musicbox https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192144 ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at ameritech.net 2006-05-28 09:52 EST ------- Damien, has then been build for FC5 & devel? If so, this can be closed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 28 14:14:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 May 2006 10:14:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192144] Review Request: musicbox In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605281414.k4SEEc6w007176@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: musicbox https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192144 splinux25 at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 28 14:51:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 May 2006 10:51:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191589] Review Request: qsa: Qt Script for Applications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605281451.k4SEpqHl008359@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qsa: Qt Script for Applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191589 lordzanon at poczta.onet.pl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lordzanon at poczta.onet.pl ------- Additional Comments From lordzanon at poczta.onet.pl 2006-05-28 10:44 EST ------- Well, are there any particular reasons qt3 package cannot make its way into fc5 extras? At least two programs would benefit from it (LabPlot and museek). Greets. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 28 14:55:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 May 2006 10:55:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191589] Review Request: qsa: Qt Script for Applications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605281455.k4SEtfeB008446@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qsa: Qt Script for Applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191589 ------- Additional Comments From frank-buettner at gmx.net 2006-05-28 10:48 EST ------- Yes. For Qt3 you will need another version of QSA. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 28 15:07:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 May 2006 11:07:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191589] Review Request: qsa: Qt Script for Applications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605281507.k4SF7JAh008666@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qsa: Qt Script for Applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191589 ------- Additional Comments From lordzanon at poczta.onet.pl 2006-05-28 10:59 EST ------- So this BR is for qt4 qsa. Will have to wait till fc6 then. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 28 15:53:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 May 2006 11:53:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191589] Review Request: qsa: Qt Script for Applications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605281553.k4SFrmNE010108@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qsa: Qt Script for Applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191589 ------- Additional Comments From frank-buettner at gmx.net 2006-05-28 11:46 EST ------- You can build an package for QSA on Qt3 when you will. But you must call it then qsa3 or something like. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 28 16:25:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 May 2006 12:25:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190502] Review Request: sportstracker In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605281625.k4SGPJhb010607@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sportstracker https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190502 jpmahowald at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |jpmahowald at gmail.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2006-05-28 12:17 EST ------- When first started, it gives a fatal looking error, "Failed to load application data! Starting with empty lists. See console output for more informations." Creation of a sport type made it go away on the next startup, however. I assume this happens with SportsTracker itself. * debuginfo package is empty, should be disabled, like how I mention in the new hint from the mono packaging tips: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Mono * README.txt has potentially useful information, though the install information is not relevant. Consider including, and possibly the other docs. - rpmlint checks return: E: sportstracker hardcoded-library-path in %{_prefix}/lib/%{name}/ A library path is hardcoded to one of the following paths: /lib, /usr/lib. It should be replaced by something like /%{_lib} or %{_libdir}. The usual hack to get it to install to /usr/lib on x86_64. Another way of doing it is to redefine %_libdir but I don't think there's a preference. E: sportstracker no-binary The package should be of the noarch architecture because it doesn't contain any binaries. Yet it installs to %_libdir. E: sportstracker only-non-binary-in-usr-lib There are only non binary files in /usr/lib so they should be in /usr/share. mono stuff is in /usr/lib. Ignore. - naming guidelines: capitalization. Authors call it SportsTracker. If they insist on the capitalization it should be SportsTracker. - package meets packaging guidelines - license (GPL) OK, text in %doc, matches source - spec file legible, in am. english - source matches upstream - package compiles on devel (x86_64) - no missing BR - no unnecessary BR - locales handled with %find_lang - not relocatable - owns all directories that it creates - no duplicate files - permissions ok - %clean ok - macro use consistent - code, not content - no need for -docs - nothing in %doc affects runtime - consider submitting .desktop file to SportsTracker -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 28 16:31:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 May 2006 12:31:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191589] Review Request: qsa: Qt Script for Applications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605281631.k4SGVbIE010746@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qsa: Qt Script for Applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191589 ------- Additional Comments From frank-buettner at gmx.net 2006-05-28 12:23 EST ------- So after the new version of the Qt package is out here the first public version of the package. http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/qsmartcard/qsa-1.2.1-3FC4.src.rpm?download -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 28 16:48:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 May 2006 12:48:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191208] Review Request: The Ipe extensible drawing editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605281648.k4SGmZIs011579@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: The Ipe extensible drawing editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191208 ------- Additional Comments From laurent.rineau__fedora_extras at normalesup.org 2006-05-28 12:41 EST ------- Update: Spec URL: http://www.di.ens.fr/~rineau/Fedora/ipe.spec SRPM URL: http://www.di.ens.fr/~rineau/Fedora/ipe-6.0-0.4.pre26.src.rpm * Sun May 28 2006 Laurent Rineau - 6.0-0.4.pre26 - No longer hardcode qt4 prefix. Use pkg-config instead. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 28 17:04:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 May 2006 13:04:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190502] Review Request: sportstracker In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605281704.k4SH4nh6011900@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sportstracker https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190502 ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at ameritech.net 2006-05-28 12:57 EST ------- Spec URL: http://piedmont.homelinux.org/fedora/sportstracker/sportstracker.spec SRPM URL: http://piedmont.homelinux.org/fedora/sportstracker/sportstracker-1.2.1-3.src.rpm * Sun May 28 2006 Brian Pepple - 1.2.1-3 - Disable debuginfo. - Use libdir macro. - Add README.txt Author doesn't care about capitilation on name, so this isn't going to be changed. Regardless, this will be changing upstream in the near future, once I finish modifing it to use a more traditional build set-up. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 28 17:34:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 May 2006 13:34:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190390] Review Request: AGReader - Console reader for viewing AmigaGuide files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605281734.k4SHYQwJ012445@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: AGReader - Console reader for viewing AmigaGuide files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190390 packages at amiga-hardware.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: AGReader: |Review Request: AGReader - |Console reader for viewing |Console reader for viewing |AmigaGuide files |AmigaGuide files -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 28 17:35:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 May 2006 13:35:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193312] Review Request: DevIL - A cross-platform image library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605281735.k4SHZxGc012473@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: DevIL - A cross-platform image library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193312 packages at amiga-hardware.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 28 17:36:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 May 2006 13:36:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193342] Review Request: cegui - Free library providing windowing and widgets for graphics APIs / engines> In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605281736.k4SHabpb012511@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cegui - Free library providing windowing and widgets for graphics APIs / engines> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193342 packages at amiga-hardware.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: |APIs / engines> -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 28 17:39:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 May 2006 13:39:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193216] Review Request: qcwebcam In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605281739.k4SHdwXk012641@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qcwebcam https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193216 ------- Additional Comments From sean.bruno at dsl-only.net 2006-05-28 13:32 EST ------- I attempted to rebuild your src rpm on my X86_64 box and received a dependency error: [sean at home-desk ~]$ sudo rpmbuild --rebuild Desktop/qcwebcam-1.1-3.fc5.src.rpm Installing Desktop/qcwebcam-1.1-3.fc5.src.rpm warning: user parag does not exist - using root warning: group parag does not exist - using root warning: user parag does not exist - using root warning: group parag does not exist - using root error: Failed build dependencies: streamer >= 1.1 is needed by qcwebcam-1.1-3.x86_64 I'm not sure what package provides 'streamer' -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 28 17:44:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 May 2006 13:44:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190390] Review Request: AGReader - Console reader for viewing AmigaGuide files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605281744.k4SHihVS012728@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: AGReader - Console reader for viewing AmigaGuide files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190390 ------- Additional Comments From packages at amiga-hardware.com 2006-05-28 13:36 EST ------- Thanks very much for your help on this. Latest version incorporates the new patch, plus a lowercase provides alias. I've also fixed the bugzilla summary for this and the other two. http://www.dribble.org.uk/AGReader.spec http://www.dribble.org.uk/AGReader-1.1-9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 28 19:27:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 May 2006 15:27:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187621] Review Request: blam In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605281927.k4SJR7rm017048@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: blam https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187621 jpmahowald at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2006-05-28 15:19 EST ------- Ah ha. With better macros from glib2-devel locales work on x86_64 http://fedorared.org/~john/review/blam-1.8.2-5.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 28 19:36:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 May 2006 15:36:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193342] Review Request: cegui - Free library providing windowing and widgets for graphics APIs / engines> In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605281936.k4SJajhS017274@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cegui - Free library providing windowing and widgets for graphics APIs / engines> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193342 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED BugsThisDependsOn| |193312 OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 28 19:37:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 May 2006 15:37:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193312] Review Request: DevIL - A cross-platform image library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605281937.k4SJb7Q5017322@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: DevIL - A cross-platform image library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193312 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |193342 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 28 19:42:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 May 2006 15:42:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190090] Review Request: In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605281942.k4SJg0JK017694@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190090 ed at eh3.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |ed at eh3.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From ed at eh3.com 2006-05-28 15:34 EST ------- Hi Krzysztof, here are a few items. Its not a complete review, its just what I could look at in the free time I had today: good: + source matches upstream + license is OK + no warnings or errors from rpmlint + no *.la files + no shared libs + appears to have propoer handling of info files needswork: - the license file should be included in %doc - the INSTALL file should not be in %doc - unfortunately, the buildsystem (configure && make) for ocrad is very minimal (its not based upon the Gnu autotools) and does not honor ${RPM_OPT_FLAGS}. Please patch Makefile.in so that you can use something like: export CXXFLAGS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS" make in the spec-file -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 28 19:44:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 May 2006 15:44:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190090] Review Request: In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605281944.k4SJipQp017883@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190090 ------- Additional Comments From ed at eh3.com 2006-05-28 15:37 EST ------- Oh, I meant to ask that you please create an SRPM that fixes the above items and I'll then do a full review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 28 19:50:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 May 2006 15:50:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193342] Review Request: cegui - Free library providing windowing and widgets for graphics APIs / engines> In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605281950.k4SJoFMv018175@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cegui - Free library providing windowing and widgets for graphics APIs / engines> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193342 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-05-28 15:42 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > Thanks very much for the patch. I had to make a tiny change to it, because it > introduced the following trivial error: > > src/Makefile.am:151: noinst_HEADERS must be set with `=' before using `+=' > Ah, I didn't get that error because I removed ./bootstrap from %build. You should not call automake, aclocal, autoconf, etc (which ./bootstrap does) unless you've got a really good reason. If you do call them you should do so in %prep not %build. > Does this also apply to the private copy of lua include with the source > package? I suspect it probably does, although there's no shared libs in the FE > lua. Yes it does apply to lua and tinyxml too. I did notice lua but I forgot again. Even though lua as packaged only provides a .a file and not a .so file you should still use the system version during the build, it might contain Fedora specific fixes (for example for the always bleeding edge Fedora gcc version) and feel free to file a bug against lua asking for a .so instead of the .a . Since tinyxml isn't currently packaged we can leave that in, if you want todo something with regard to the xml code in cegui, it would prabably be best to convert to libxml or expat, we alreayd have more then enough xml libs as is. But as said, just leave it as is for now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 28 19:50:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 May 2006 15:50:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193312] Review Request: DevIL - A cross-platform image library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605281950.k4SJoSUV018206@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: DevIL - A cross-platform image library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193312 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 28 20:01:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 May 2006 16:01:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193342] Review Request: cegui - Free library providing windowing and widgets for graphics APIs / engines> In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605282001.k4SK1CK4018442@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cegui - Free library providing windowing and widgets for graphics APIs / engines> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193342 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-05-28 15:53 EST ------- While I'm at here are some things which need fixing (for starters, not a full review yet): -duplicate files in %doc between base -devel -devel-docs -remove / fix non modular X (Build)Requires And as a reminder (see above) -remove call to ./bootstrap.sh -use system pcre About the system lua, it seems that cegui contains a special version of lua called tolua++, I'm still investigating this, so don't waste any time on it in the mean time. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 28 20:19:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 May 2006 16:19:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193342] Review Request: cegui - Free library providing windowing and widgets for graphics APIs / engines> In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605282019.k4SKJ4N0018735@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cegui - Free library providing windowing and widgets for graphics APIs / engines> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193342 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-05-28 16:11 EST ------- Okay, tolua++ which is used by cegui is an extension to lua, you can find tolua++ here: http://www.codenix.com/~tolua/ cegui actually includes both lua and tolua++. Since they have been dropped into one dir by the cegui author and since the tolua++ included in cegui is so old that it probably doesn't suppor the lua shipped with Fe. Its probably best to: -package the real tolua++ from above -completly remove the one included in cegui -use the system installed tolua++ when building cegui (just as with pcre) Since this is going to be a somewhat longer path the originally planned, first get DevIL into shape and then I'll sponsor you so you can import DevIL and AGReader while you (we) are working on this. Also please be so kind as to file a bug against lua about it only containing a .a and put me in the CC of this bug, it might be a good idea to put a pointer to this bug into this new bug. (just type "bug 193342" then BZ will automaticly create a link). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 28 20:37:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 May 2006 16:37:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193446] New: Review Request:
Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193446 Summary: Review Request:
Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: madcat at mymadcat.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://mymadcat.com/gliv.spec SRPM URL: http://mymadcat.com/gliv.src.rpm Description: GLiv is an OpenGL image viewer. GLiv is very fast and smooth at rotating, panning and zooming if you have an OpenGL accelerated graphics board. The spec file is took from dag, the package does not seem to be maintained anymore... I spoke to the author, who is ok for gliv to enter fedora extras. This is my first package for fedora extras, so I seek a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 28 20:47:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 May 2006 16:47:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187621] Review Request: blam In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605282047.k4SKl8aW019703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: blam https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187621 jpmahowald at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |jpmahowald at gmail.com OtherBugsDependingO| |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2006-05-28 16:39 EST ------- - rpmlint checks return: W: blam non-conffile-in-etc /etc/gconf/schemas/blam.schemas - package meets naming guidelines - package meets packaging guidelines - license (GPL) OK, text in %doc, matches source - spec file legible, in am. english - source matches upstream - package compiles on devel (x86_64) - no missing BR - no unnecessary BR - locales handled with %find_lang - not relocatable - owns all directories that it creates - no duplicate files - permissions ok - %clean ok - macro use consistent - code, not content - no need for -docs - nothing in %doc affects runtime - .desktop file - works APPROVED I'll work on getting the patch to the author. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 28 20:53:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 May 2006 16:53:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187292] Review Request: gecko-sharp In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605282053.k4SKr2p3019921@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gecko-sharp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187292 jpmahowald at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2006-05-28 16:45 EST ------- Closed. Turns out porting to gecko-sharp2 was not hard at all, merely changing some macros. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 28 20:53:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 May 2006 16:53:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187621] Review Request: blam In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605282053.k4SKrEWS019942@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: blam https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187621 Bug 187621 depends on bug 187292, which changed state. Bug 187292 Summary: Review Request: gecko-sharp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187292 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NOTABUG Status|NEW |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 28 23:50:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 May 2006 19:50:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191014] Review Request: ganymed In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605282350.k4SNoAYT024453@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ganymed https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191014 ------- Additional Comments From robert at marcanoonline.com 2006-05-28 19:42 EST ------- updated files http://www.marcanoonline.com/downloads/fedora/package_submissions/subclipse/ganymed.spec http://www.marcanoonline.com/downloads/fedora/package_submissions/subclipse/ganymed-209-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 29 00:05:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 May 2006 20:05:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191015] Review Request: javasvn In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605290005.k4T05obU024695@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: javasvn https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191015 ------- Additional Comments From robert at marcanoonline.com 2006-05-28 19:58 EST ------- Updated files http://www.marcanoonline.com/downloads/fedora/package_submissions/subclipse/javasvn.spec http://www.marcanoonline.com/downloads/fedora/package_submissions/subclipse/javasvn-1.0.4-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 29 01:25:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 May 2006 21:25:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189268] Review Request: xscreensaver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605290125.k4T1PGbE026642@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xscreensaver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189268 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-05-28 21:17 EST ------- For the buildsys problem, I filed it as https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193452 and Jeremy Katz fixed this bug. Rebuilding suceeded for FE-devel!! When I am able to see xscreensaver-5.00-1 rpms on internet, I will close this bug as CLOSED NEXTRELEASE. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 29 01:40:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 May 2006 21:40:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191016] Review Request: svn-client-adapter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605290140.k4T1e4nm027067@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: svn-client-adapter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191016 ------- Additional Comments From robert at marcanoonline.com 2006-05-28 21:32 EST ------- That email explaint it all Integrated with eclipse-subclipse (See Bug 191017) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 29 01:41:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 May 2006 21:41:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191017] Review Request: subclipse In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605290141.k4T1fXQh027187@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: subclipse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191017 ------- Additional Comments From robert at marcanoonline.com 2006-05-28 21:33 EST ------- Updated files http://www.marcanoonline.com/downloads/fedora/package_submissions/subclipse/eclipse-subclipse-1.0.1-4.src.rpm http://www.marcanoonline.com/downloads/fedora/package_submissions/subclipse/eclipse-subclipse.spec I have bee unable to solve the classloader problem http://www.marcanoonline.com/downloads/fedora/package_submissions/subclipse/exception.log so the patch to disable the javahl interface is still being applied -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 29 01:53:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 May 2006 21:53:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193312] Review Request: DevIL - A cross-platform image library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605290153.k4T1rQ2F027763@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: DevIL - A cross-platform image library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193312 ------- Additional Comments From packages at amiga-hardware.com 2006-05-28 21:45 EST ------- Here's the latest version which should fix all those issues. http://www.dribble.org.uk/DevIL.spec http://www.dribble.org.uk/DevIL-1.6.8-0.6.rc1.src.rpm PS. Don't worry, take all the time you need. We all have work and life away from the computer screen :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 29 02:27:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 May 2006 22:27:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193446] Review Request: GLiv: OpenGL image viewer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605290227.k4T2RofX028322@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: GLiv: OpenGL image viewer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193446 rc040203 at freenet.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request:
|image viewer ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2006-05-28 22:20 EST ------- (In reply to comment #0) > Spec URL: http://mymadcat.com/gliv.spec > SRPM URL: http://mymadcat.com/gliv.src.rpm All I get when accessing one of these URLs is 404 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 29 03:06:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 May 2006 23:06:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193216] Review Request: qcwebcam In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605290306.k4T36UWI029639@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qcwebcam https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193216 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-05-28 22:58 EST ------- Yes, its dependent on streamer package that provides command line tool streamer to record video. i have already uploaded it at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193224 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 29 03:22:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 May 2006 23:22:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193342] Review Request: cegui - Free library providing windowing and widgets for graphics APIs / engines> In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605290322.k4T3MhEQ029924@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cegui - Free library providing windowing and widgets for graphics APIs / engines> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193342 ------- Additional Comments From packages at amiga-hardware.com 2006-05-28 23:14 EST ------- Ok, here's the current state of play for cegui. http://dribble.org.uk/cegui.spec http://dribble.org.uk/cegui-0.4.1-3.src.rpm I've filed a bug against lua and begin looking at tolua++. Thanks Hans -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 29 04:42:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 00:42:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193271] Review Request: python-dns - DNS toolkit for Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605290442.k4T4gJVU000631@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-dns - DNS toolkit for Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193271 jeff at ollie.clive.ia.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From jeff at ollie.clive.ia.us 2006-05-29 00:34 EST ------- Thanks for the review! Package imported, built for devel, branches requested for FC-4 and FC-5. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 29 04:42:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 00:42:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193281] Review Request: python-xmpp - Python library for easy scripting with Jabber In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605290442.k4T4ghDq000683@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-xmpp - Python library for easy scripting with Jabber https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193281 Bug 193281 depends on bug 193271, which changed state. Bug 193271 Summary: Review Request: python-dns - DNS toolkit for Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193271 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 29 04:59:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 00:59:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193210] Review Request: htmldoc - Convert HTML source files into HTML, PostScript, or PDF In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605290459.k4T4xktI001433@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: htmldoc - Convert HTML source files into HTML, PostScript, or PDF https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193210 ------- Additional Comments From adam at spicenitz.org 2006-05-29 00:52 EST ------- Thanks. I've put a new version: http://www.spicenitz.org/fedora/htmldoc-1.8.26-3.src.rpm http://www.spicenitz.org/fedora/htmldoc.spec This installs icons, desktop file, and MIME type. (Lots of scriptlets!) Hope I've got the MIME stuff all right. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 29 05:06:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 01:06:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193455] New: Old version header file /usr/include/linux/joystick.h GOTCHA Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193455 Summary: Old version header file /usr/include/linux/joystick.h GOTCHA Product: Fedora Core Version: fc5 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: high Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: notting at redhat.com ReportedBy: aye at shaw.ca QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Description of problem: /usr/include/linux/joystick.h is version 1.1 and should be version 1.3 This is the evil that gives you grief in communicating with joydev. The solution is to get a copy of joystick.h from the kernel-devel or kernel source rpm. /usr/src/kernels/2.6.16-1.2122_FC5-i686/include/linux/joystick.h or /usr/src/redhat/BUILD/kernel-2.6.16/vanilla/include/linux/joystick.h respectively I wonder how many other header files in /usr/include/linux are years out of synch with the kernel. Please upgrade /usr/include/linux/joystick.h to version 1.3 ************************************************************* Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. Actual results: Expected results: Additional info: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 29 05:23:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 01:23:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 186327] Review Request: tcltls In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605290523.k4T5NYjc001926@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tcltls https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=186327 sander at hoentjen.eu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE AssignedTo|wart at kobold.org |bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ------- Additional Comments From sander at hoentjen.eu 2006-05-29 01:15 EST ------- Package has been built for devel now, and I will request build for FC4 and 5 as soon as the branches are created -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 29 05:23:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 01:23:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 185951] Review Request: amsn : msn messenger clone In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605290523.k4T5NbLX001954@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: amsn : msn messenger clone https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=185951 Bug 185951 depends on bug 186327, which changed state. Bug 186327 Summary: Review Request: tcltls https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=186327 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 29 05:40:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 01:40:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193224] Review Request: streamer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605290540.k4T5exAx002697@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: streamer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193224 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |urgent -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 29 05:51:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 01:51:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193312] Review Request: DevIL - A cross-platform image library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605290551.k4T5pq0O003288@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: DevIL - A cross-platform image library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193312 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-05-29 01:44 EST ------- I think building this as is on the buildsys (or in mock) is going to fail, because of a missing libGLU-devel BuildRequires (my bad). Also requiring both libGLU-devel and libGL-devel for the -devel package is a bit redundant (my bad again) libGLU-devel requires libGL-devel itself. All Must Fix and Should Fix items fixed -> Approved! Go create your self an account in the fedora account system as described here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/Contributors And fill in the CLA, then drop me a note and I'll sponsor you. p.s. Don't forget to fix the BR before import. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 29 05:52:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 01:52:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193281] Review Request: python-xmpp - Python library for easy scripting with Jabber In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605290552.k4T5qbMs003313@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-xmpp - Python library for easy scripting with Jabber https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193281 ------- Additional Comments From jeff at ollie.clive.ia.us 2006-05-29 01:44 EST ------- Thanks for the review! Package imported, built for devel, branches requested for FC-4 and FC-5. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 29 05:53:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 01:53:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193281] Review Request: python-xmpp - Python library for easy scripting with Jabber In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605290553.k4T5rcp7003349@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-xmpp - Python library for easy scripting with Jabber https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193281 jeff at ollie.clive.ia.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 29 05:53:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 01:53:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188542] Review Request: hylafax In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605290553.k4T5rVcx003343@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hylafax https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188542 fedora at leemhuis.info changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora at leemhuis.info ------- Additional Comments From fedora at leemhuis.info 2006-05-29 01:45 EST ------- ping -- I wanted to look at this three times but each time http://osdn.dl.sourceforge.net/ was unreachable :-/ -- is this just me having bad luck? If not: can you upload the files somewhere else? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 29 05:56:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 01:56:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188542] Review Request: hylafax In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605290556.k4T5uPeU003435@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hylafax https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188542 ------- Additional Comments From faxguy at howardsilvan.com 2006-05-29 01:48 EST ------- Please try this mirror: http://superb-west.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/hylafax/hylafax-4.3.0.3-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 29 06:09:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 02:09:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192603] Review Request: openalpp - Object Oriented version of OpenAL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605290609.k4T69PQ3003824@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: openalpp - Object Oriented version of OpenAL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192603 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-05-29 02:01 EST ------- Claiming this one before Mike (wart) does it, so that I actually get a chance to give some reviews back for all the reviews you have been doing for me :) Dunno when I have the time todo the actual review though, might take a couple of days (but no longer). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 29 06:11:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 02:11:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193455] Old version header file /usr/include/linux/joystick.h GOTCHA In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605290611.k4T6Btpj003973@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Old version header file /usr/include/linux/joystick.h GOTCHA https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193455 ville.skytta at iki.fi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|Package Review |glibc-kernheaders AssignedTo|notting at redhat.com |dwmw2 at redhat.com QAContact|extras-qa at fedoraproject.org |bbrock at redhat.com CC|fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 29 06:36:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 02:36:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189713] Review Request: gnubg In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605290636.k4T6aGf0004594@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnubg https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189713 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-05-29 02:28 EST ------- Joost, I noticed you put this game on the Games SIG review list (good!). But thats not entirely how it works, we (the Games SIG) have got this sortof unwritten rule of a review for a review. So shall we exchange reviews? I currently need a reviewer for: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192060 Also, before I do a review I would like you to post a new version fixing the issues mentioned in comment 1 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 29 06:40:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 02:40:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190343] Review Request: VDR - Video Disk Recorder In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605290640.k4T6eOiY004930@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: VDR - Video Disk Recorder https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190343 ------- Additional Comments From enrico.scholz at informatik.tu-chemnitz.de 2006-05-29 02:32 EST ------- Sorry for the delay... Comments: * you are writing | %{__patch} -i ... | ... | ... make ... | install ... For consistency, you should either use everywhere the '%__XXXX' macros, or everywhere only 'XXXX'. * the version in | BuildRequires: glibc-kernheaders >= 2.4-9.1.94 is unneeded; every target system has this version of the glibc-kernheaders package * you are placing files into an unowned directory; so (despite of the no-ordered-package-removal problem) the | Requires: udev should be | Requires(pre): udev | Requires(postun): udev (or '/etc/udev/rules.d' instead of 'udev') to guarantee that the directory exists before vdr files will be placed into it. * the vdr recordings might be shared between several machines. It would be nice when the generated UIDs/GIDs would be identical everywhere. So please use 'fedora-usermgt' for the 'vdr' user and 'video' group. * I am not sure about the 'vdr' username; three-letter usernames produce a high chance for conflicts with local usernames so I would avoid them and use e.g. 'vdrdaemon' instead of. On the other side, 'vdr' has some history and not using 'vdr' might cause other problems * ownership/location of the vdr configuration directory is another problem. I dislike the vdr:video owned /etc/vdr directory somehow because: * some configuration data is modified by the 'vdr' daemon (channels.conf, remote.conf, setup.conf) so it should be located in /var/lib/vdr * not all configuration data should be modifiable by the daemon (e.g. commands.conf) so permissions should should be root:video. * rpmlint generates lot of | E: vdr non-standard-uid ... vdr | E: vdr non-standard-gid ... vdr warnings which can be ignored. Ditto for | W: vdr non-conffile-in-etc /etc/sysconfig/vdr-plugins.d/README The | E: vdr zero-length /etc/vdr/setup.conf is related to the previous comment about the configuration files * I use the following tweak to the udev-rules to generates a predictable event device for the remote-control: | SUBSYSTEM=="input", SYSFS{../name}=="DVB on-card IR receiver", SYMLINK+="input/event-remote", GROUP="video", MODE="0660" This is valid for a Hauppauge Nexus-S; other cards will need another name. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 29 08:45:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 04:45:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177106] Review Request: libgdgeda - graphical library for gEDA In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605290845.k4T8jB8I013511@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgdgeda - graphical library for gEDA https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177106 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-05-29 04:37 EST ------- Erm, ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 29 09:03:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 05:03:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192603] Review Request: openalpp - Object Oriented version of OpenAL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605290903.k4T93Wr5014721@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: openalpp - Object Oriented version of OpenAL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192603 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-05-29 04:55 EST ------- MUST: ===== * rpmlint output is: W: openalpp-devel no-documentation No problem here. * Package and spec file named appropriately * Packaged according to packaging guidelines * License (LGPL) ok, license file included * spec file is legible and in Am. English. * Source matches upstream * Compiles and builds on devel-i386 * BR: ok * No locales * ldconfig properly called for shared libraries * Not relocatable * Package owns / or requires all dirs * No duplicate files & Permissions ok * %clean & macro usage OK * Contains code only * %doc does not affect runtime, and isn't large enough to warrent a sub package * proper -devel package needed * .la files not packaged * no gui -> no .desktop file required MUST fix: ========= * Group: for the base package is wrong it should be: "System Environment/Libraries" Should fix: =========== * Why patch 3330 ??? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 29 09:06:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 05:06:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193224] Review Request: streamer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605290906.k4T96JcY014976@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: streamer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193224 paul at city-fan.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |193216 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 29 09:06:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 05:06:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193216] Review Request: qcwebcam In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605290906.k4T96Ud7014991@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qcwebcam https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193216 paul at city-fan.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |193224 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 29 09:40:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 05:40:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193224] Review Request: streamer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605290940.k4T9e6Kh016692@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: streamer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193224 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-05-29 05:32 EST ------- can any one check whether this package is according to Fedora Extras Guidlines?? Is there anything remaining or its ready to go in Fedora Extras?? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 29 09:43:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 05:43:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193342] Review Request: cegui - Free library providing windowing and widgets for graphics APIs / engines> In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605290943.k4T9hEVV016935@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cegui - Free library providing windowing and widgets for graphics APIs / engines> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193342 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-05-29 05:35 EST ------- Glad to hear you're looking into tolua++, I think the best way to proceed is to first package tolua++ and then fix cegui to use it. Once you're done packaging tolua++ feel free to add me to the cc-list for the review then I'll take a look (as time permits). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 29 09:53:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 05:53:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191036] Review Request: libmp4v2 a library for handling the mp4 container format In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605290953.k4T9rQfk017543@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libmp4v2 a library for handling the mp4 container format https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191036 ------- Additional Comments From noa at resare.com 2006-05-29 05:45 EST ------- While waiting for a word from the legal gurus, libmp4v2 is available from rpm.livna.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 29 10:10:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 06:10:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 183912] Review Request: jack-audio-connection-kit - The Jack Audio Connection Kit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605291010.k4TAAdsq018211@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jack-audio-connection-kit - The Jack Audio Connection Kit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183912 andy at smile.org.ua changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 29 10:11:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 06:11:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189884] Review Request: LASH Audio Session Handler In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605291011.k4TABXVn018304@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: LASH Audio Session Handler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189884 Bug 189884 depends on bug 183912, which changed state. Bug 183912 Summary: Review Request: jack-audio-connection-kit - The Jack Audio Connection Kit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183912 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 29 10:11:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 06:11:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189322] Review Request: rosegarden4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605291011.k4TABjdT018322@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rosegarden4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189322 Bug 189322 depends on bug 183912, which changed state. Bug 183912 Summary: Review Request: jack-audio-connection-kit - The Jack Audio Connection Kit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183912 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 29 10:12:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 06:12:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189315] Review Request: ardour In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605291012.k4TAC8px018378@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ardour https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189315 Bug 189315 depends on bug 183912, which changed state. Bug 183912 Summary: Review Request: jack-audio-connection-kit - The Jack Audio Connection Kit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183912 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 29 10:12:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 06:12:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191239] Review Request: qjackctl - Qt based JACK control application In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605291012.k4TACfDB018424@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qjackctl - Qt based JACK control application https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191239 Bug 191239 depends on bug 183912, which changed state. Bug 183912 Summary: Review Request: jack-audio-connection-kit - The Jack Audio Connection Kit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183912 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 29 10:13:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 06:13:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193224] Review Request: streamer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605291013.k4TADFtW018477@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: streamer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193224 paul at city-fan.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |paul at city-fan.org ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-05-29 06:05 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > can any one check whether this package is according to Fedora Extras Guidlines?? > Is there anything remaining or its ready to go in Fedora Extras?? It can go into Fedora Extras when someone has reviewed it, approved it, and changed the blocker bug to FE-ACCEPT. So far none of these things have happened. Do you currently have any other packages already in Fedora Extras? If not, you'll also need a sponsor for cvs access, and should add the blocker bug of FE-NEEDSPONSOR to this review request. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 29 10:19:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 06:19:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 182415] Review Request: man-pages-uk - Ukrainian man pages from Linux Documentation Project In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605291019.k4TAJAiG018740@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: man-pages-uk - Ukrainian man pages from Linux Documentation Project https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=182415 andy at smile.org.ua changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: manpages-uk-|Review Request: man-pages-uk |utf8 - Ukrainian man pages |- Ukrainian man pages from |from Linux Documentation |Linux Documentation Project |Project | ------- Additional Comments From andy at smile.org.ua 2006-05-29 06:11 EST ------- According to http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-extras-list/2006-May/ msg00927.html I'll rename package to man-pages-uk. It's more sense here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 29 10:49:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 06:49:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 174866] Review Request: polypaudio: Improved Linux sound server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605291049.k4TAnXHj020421@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: polypaudio: Improved Linux sound server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174866 ------- Additional Comments From drzeus-bugzilla at drzeus.cx 2006-05-29 06:41 EST ------- Spec Name or Url: http://homes.hades.drzeus.cx/~drzeus/polypaudio/polypaudio.spec SRPM Name or Url: http://homes.hades.drzeus.cx/~drzeus/polypaudio/polypaudio-0.9.0-1.src.rpm Updated again. Anyone but me still interested in this? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 29 10:50:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 06:50:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 174866] Review Request: polypaudio: Improved Linux sound server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605291050.k4TAoG3V020498@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: polypaudio: Improved Linux sound server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174866 ------- Additional Comments From drzeus-bugzilla at drzeus.cx 2006-05-29 06:42 EST ------- Spec Name or Url: http://homes.drzeus.cx/~drzeus/polypaudio/polypaudio.spec SRPM Name or Url: http://homes.drzeus.cx/~drzeus/polypaudio/polypaudio-0.9.0-1.src.rpm Bad URLs, sorry about that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 29 10:51:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 06:51:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193224] Review Request: streamer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605291051.k4TApvvK020604@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: streamer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193224 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-05-29 06:44 EST ------- i am already waiting for package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193216 approval and streamer is required to be installed first before using qcwebcam package. I need sponsor for cvs access. What steps shoul i follow? how can i add he blocker bug of FE-NEEDSPONSOR to this review request?? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 29 10:52:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 06:52:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193216] Review Request: qcwebcam In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605291052.k4TAqIdl020632@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qcwebcam https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193216 Bug 193216 depends on bug 193224, which changed state. Bug 193224 Summary: Review Request: streamer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193224 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NOTABUG Status|NEW |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 29 11:22:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 07:22:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177235] Review Request: sysconftool - Macros for aclocal to install configuration files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605291122.k4TBMgIb021437@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sysconftool - Macros for aclocal to install configuration files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177235 ------- Additional Comments From bugs.michael at gmx.net 2006-05-29 07:14 EST ------- Hereby I'm withdrawing my offer to sponsor Dominik (bug 177105, 177104), because I haven't heard back from him for almost two months and because Tom has offered to sponsor him nearly three months earlier here. With complaints that the package review queue takes too long to process, I find it impolite not to react in a timely manner. Also, the NEED-SPONSOR dependencies ought to be removed from all of a packager's tickets as soon as somebody offers sponsorship. I'm going to do that now, since the system does NOT work if this is not done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 29 11:26:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 07:26:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187609] Review Request: tre - POSIX compatible regexp library with approximate matching In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605291126.k4TBQW8a021537@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tre - POSIX compatible regexp library with approximate matching https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187609 bugs.michael at gmx.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778, 187610 |177841 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From bugs.michael at gmx.net 2006-05-29 07:18 EST ------- Dropping FE-NEEDSPONSOR. Tom Callaway offered sponsorship in bug 177235 (and bugzilla change-several-bugs-at-once feature requires me to add/edit something). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 29 11:26:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 07:26:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187610] Review Request: crm114 - CRM114 Bayesian Spam Detector In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605291126.k4TBQh7h021564@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: crm114 - CRM114 Bayesian Spam Detector https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187610 bugs.michael at gmx.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn|187609 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 29 11:27:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 07:27:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177860] Review Request: libXvMCW - A Wrapper for run-time loading of XvMC libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605291127.k4TBRIv3021631@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libXvMCW - A Wrapper for run-time loading of XvMC libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177860 bugs.michael at gmx.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From bugs.michael at gmx.net 2006-05-29 07:19 EST ------- Dropping FE-NEEDSPONSOR. Tom Callaway offered sponsorship in bug 177235 (and bugzilla change-several-bugs-at-once feature requires me to add/edit something). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 29 11:27:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 07:27:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177235] Review Request: sysconftool - Macros for aclocal to install configuration files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605291127.k4TBRqVh021701@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sysconftool - Macros for aclocal to install configuration files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177235 bugs.michael at gmx.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163779 |177841 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From bugs.michael at gmx.net 2006-05-29 07:20 EST ------- Dropping FE-NEEDSPONSOR. Tom Callaway offered sponsorship in bug 177235 (and bugzilla change-several-bugs-at-once feature requires me to add/edit something). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 29 11:28:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 07:28:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177104] Review Request: abook - Text-based addressbook program for mutt In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605291128.k4TBSlZ9021834@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: abook - Text-based addressbook program for mutt https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177104 bugs.michael at gmx.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163779 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From bugs.michael at gmx.net 2006-05-29 07:21 EST ------- Dropping FE-NEEDSPONSOR. Tom Callaway offered sponsorship in bug 177235 (and bugzilla change-several-bugs-at-once feature requires me to add/edit something). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 29 11:29:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 07:29:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177134] Review Request: mkvtoolnix - Matroska container utilites In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605291129.k4TBT1bK021872@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mkvtoolnix - Matroska container utilites https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177134 bugs.michael at gmx.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778, 182235 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From bugs.michael at gmx.net 2006-05-29 07:21 EST ------- Dropping FE-NEEDSPONSOR. Tom Callaway offered sponsorship in bug 177235 (and bugzilla change-several-bugs-at-once feature requires me to add/edit something). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 29 11:29:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 07:29:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177401] Review Request: clamsmtp - SMTP filter for ClamAV In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605291129.k4TBTuU1021955@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clamsmtp - SMTP filter for ClamAV https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177401 bugs.michael at gmx.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From bugs.michael at gmx.net 2006-05-29 07:22 EST ------- Dropping FE-NEEDSPONSOR. Tom Callaway offered sponsorship in bug 177235 (and bugzilla change-several-bugs-at-once feature requires me to add/edit something). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 29 11:30:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 07:30:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187609] Review Request: tre - POSIX compatible regexp library with approximate matching In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605291130.k4TBUERd021997@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tre - POSIX compatible regexp library with approximate matching https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187609 bugs.michael at gmx.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 |163778, 187610 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From bugs.michael at gmx.net 2006-05-29 07:22 EST ------- uhm, bugzilla is broken :( -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 29 11:30:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 07:30:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187610] Review Request: crm114 - CRM114 Bayesian Spam Detector In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605291130.k4TBUPOF022021@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: crm114 - CRM114 Bayesian Spam Detector https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187610 bugs.michael at gmx.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |187609 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 29 11:30:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 07:30:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177117] Review Request: libtlen - Tlen.pl client library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605291130.k4TBUpLU022109@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libtlen - Tlen.pl client library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177117 bugs.michael at gmx.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From bugs.michael at gmx.net 2006-05-29 07:23 EST ------- Dropping FE-NEEDSPONSOR. Tom Callaway offered sponsorship in bug 177235 (and bugzilla change-several-bugs-at-once feature requires me to add/edit something). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 29 11:31:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 07:31:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177232] Review Request: regionset - reads/sets the region code of DVD drives In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605291131.k4TBV5lM022146@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: regionset - reads/sets the region code of DVD drives https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177232 bugs.michael at gmx.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From bugs.michael at gmx.net 2006-05-29 07:23 EST ------- Dropping FE-NEEDSPONSOR. Tom Callaway offered sponsorship in bug 177235 (and bugzilla change-several-bugs-at-once feature requires me to add/edit something). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 29 11:31:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 07:31:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177104] Review Request: abook - Text-based addressbook program for mutt In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605291131.k4TBVlac022207@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: abook - Text-based addressbook program for mutt https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177104 bugs.michael at gmx.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From bugs.michael at gmx.net 2006-05-29 07:24 EST ------- uhm, bugzilla is broken :( -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 29 11:32:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 07:32:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177105] Review Request: gnomeradio - Graphical FM-Tuner program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605291132.k4TBW1jU022243@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnomeradio - Graphical FM-Tuner program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177105 bugs.michael at gmx.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 29 11:34:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 07:34:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177134] Review Request: mkvtoolnix - Matroska container utilites In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605291134.k4TBY1qc022311@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mkvtoolnix - Matroska container utilites https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177134 bugs.michael at gmx.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 |163778, 182235 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From bugs.michael at gmx.net 2006-05-29 07:26 EST ------- uhm, bugzilla is broken :( -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 29 11:35:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 07:35:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177860] Review Request: libXvMCW - A Wrapper for run-time loading of XvMC libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605291135.k4TBZj5F022426@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libXvMCW - A Wrapper for run-time loading of XvMC libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177860 bugs.michael at gmx.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 |163776 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From bugs.michael at gmx.net 2006-05-29 07:28 EST ------- uhm, bugzilla is broken :( -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 29 11:36:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 07:36:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177117] Review Request: libtlen - Tlen.pl client library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605291136.k4TBaGq5022496@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libtlen - Tlen.pl client library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177117 bugs.michael at gmx.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 |163776 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From bugs.michael at gmx.net 2006-05-29 07:28 EST ------- uhm, bugzilla is broken :( -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 29 11:36:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 07:36:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177211] Review Request: newsx - NNTP news exchange utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605291136.k4TBaIhL022515@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: newsx - NNTP news exchange utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177211 bugs.michael at gmx.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 29 11:36:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 07:36:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193470] New: Review Request: renrot - A program to rename and rotate files according to EXIF tags Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193470 Summary: Review Request: renrot - A program to rename and rotate files according to EXIF tags Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: andy at smile.org.ua QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: ftp://andriy.asplinux.com.ua/pub/people/andy/extras/renrot.spec SRPM URL: ftp://andriy.asplinux.com.ua/pub/people/andy/extras/renrot-0.19.3-1.src.rpm Description: Renrot renames files according the DateTimeOriginal and FileModifyDate EXIF tags, if they exist. Otherwise, the name will be set according to the current timestamp. Additionally, it rotates files and their thumbnails, accordingly Orientation EXIF tag. The script can also put commentary into the Commentary and UserComment tags. Personal details can be specified via XMP tags defined in a configuration file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 29 11:37:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 07:37:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177235] Review Request: sysconftool - Macros for aclocal to install configuration files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605291137.k4TBb3XF022649@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sysconftool - Macros for aclocal to install configuration files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177235 bugs.michael at gmx.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From bugs.michael at gmx.net 2006-05-29 07:29 EST ------- uhm, bugzilla is broken :( -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 29 11:37:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 07:37:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177401] Review Request: clamsmtp - SMTP filter for ClamAV In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605291137.k4TBbo56022774@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clamsmtp - SMTP filter for ClamAV https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177401 bugs.michael at gmx.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 29 11:38:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 07:38:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177232] Review Request: regionset - reads/sets the region code of DVD drives In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605291138.k4TBcevj022870@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: regionset - reads/sets the region code of DVD drives https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177232 bugs.michael at gmx.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 | nThis| | OtherBugsDependingO|177841 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From bugs.michael at gmx.net 2006-05-29 07:23 EST ------- Dropping FE-NEEDSPONSOR. Tom Callaway offered sponsorship in bug 177235 (and bugzilla change-several-bugs-at-once feature requires me to add/edit something). ------- Additional Comments From bugs.michael at gmx.net 2006-05-29 07:31 EST ------- uhm, bugzilla is broken :( -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 29 12:07:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 08:07:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193216] Review Request: qcwebcam In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605291207.k4TC7Oka024323@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qcwebcam https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193216 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 29 12:09:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 08:09:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193224] Review Request: streamer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605291209.k4TC9aRs024397@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: streamer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193224 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 29 12:09:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 08:09:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193216] Review Request: qcwebcam In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605291209.k4TC9bk3024407@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qcwebcam https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193216 paul at city-fan.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |NEW Keywords| |Reopened Resolution|NOTABUG | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 29 12:09:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 08:09:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193216] Review Request: qcwebcam In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605291209.k4TC9vOE024440@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qcwebcam https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193216 paul at city-fan.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |NEW Keywords| |Reopened Resolution|NOTABUG | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 29 12:15:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 08:15:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193224] Review Request: streamer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605291215.k4TCFF4e024612@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: streamer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193224 paul at city-fan.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |NEW Keywords| |Reopened Resolution|NOTABUG | ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-05-29 08:07 EST ------- I had a quick look at this package, and spotted these things: 1. Lose the "Provides: streamer-1.1-2" header. RPM will generate an appropriate Provides: entry itself. 2. Wrap the %description at 80 columns. 3. Try to wrap lomg lines in %install by using backslashes and continuation lines to make the spec file more readable. 4. The package does not honor %{optflags}. You can fix this by adding the following command to the end of %prep: sed -i -e 's/^\(CFLAGS *:= \).*/\1%{optflags}/' Makefile 5. Include some documentation. README and ChangeLog seem appropriate. 6. If you are this package's upstream, bundle a copy of the GPL with the tarball and include it as %doc in the RPM package. If you're not upstream yourself, ask whoever is to include a copy of the GPL. 7. Add missing buildreqs ncurses-devel libXt-devel libjpeg-devel libpng-devel (test-build your packages in mock to find missing buildreqs) 8. Lose the "-s" from the install commands. Stripping binaries is done automatically by rpmbuild and if you do it yourself you'll get useless debuginfo packages. 9. Your package needs to own directory %{_libdir}/streamer/; otherwise, it will left on the system when the package is removed. (In reply to comment #3) > i am already waiting for package > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193216 approval and > streamer is required to be installed first before using qcwebcam package. This is why I added bug 193216 to the list of bugs that this one blocks. You need to get this package into Extras before qcwebcam because that package depends on this one. > I need sponsor for cvs access. What steps shoul i follow? See http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/Contributors > how can i add he blocker bug of FE-NEEDSPONSOR to this review request?? It appears you have figured that out for yourself. I have reponed this bug though, which you appear to have closed by mistake. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 29 12:15:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 08:15:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193216] Review Request: qcwebcam In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605291215.k4TCFbgo024634@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qcwebcam https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193216 Bug 193216 depends on bug 193224, which changed state. Bug 193224 Summary: Review Request: streamer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193224 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|NOTABUG | Status|CLOSED |NEW -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 29 12:53:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 08:53:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193224] Review Request: streamer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605291253.k4TCr5aC026815@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: streamer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193224 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-05-29 08:45 EST ------- paul, Did what u suggest changes. Can you check again those URL's and check is there something remaining to be done? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 29 13:00:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 09:00:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193224] Review Request: streamer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605291300.k4TD0l7W027091@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: streamer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193224 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-05-29 08:53 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > paul, > Did what u suggest changes. Can you check again those URL's and check is > there something remaining to be done? Can you please increment the release number of the package, make an appropriate changelog entry, and post updated URLs whenever you make a change to the package? This helps people reading the review request to identify which comments are associated with which revision of the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 29 13:16:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 09:16:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193224] Review Request: streamer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605291316.k4TDG0Ig027609@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: streamer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193224 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-05-29 09:08 EST ------- I updated Release number and added a ChangeLog entry in it. Updated files are at Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/pnemade/Qcwebcam/streamer.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/pnemade/Qcwebcam/streamer-1.1-3.fc5.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 29 13:29:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 09:29:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188574] Review Request: rss-glx -- Really Slick Screensavers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605291329.k4TDTSf1028111@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rss-glx -- Really Slick Screensavers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188574 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-05-29 09:21 EST ------- Debuginfo rpm contains broken symlinks. ./rss-glx_0.8.1.p/oglc_src/driver.cpp ./rss-glx_0.8.1.p/other_src/driver.c ./rss-glx_0.8.1.p/reallyslick/c_src/driver.c ./rss-glx_0.8.1.p/reallyslick/cpp_src/driver.cpp All of these are broken. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 29 14:00:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 10:00:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193478] New: Review Request: wordpress - database driven blogging software Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193478 Summary: Review Request: wordpress - database driven blogging software Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: jwb at redhat.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Description: Wordpress is an online publishing / weblog package that makes it very easy, almost trivial, to get information out to people on the web. Spec: http://www.berningeronline.net/wordpress.spec SRPM: http://www.berningeronline.net/wordpress-2.0.2-0.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 29 14:28:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 10:28:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193479] New: Review Request: xwrits Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193479 Summary: Review Request: xwrits Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: jlayton at redhat.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/jlayton/xwrits/xwrits.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/jlayton/xwrits/xwrits-2.22-1.src.rpm Description: Xwrits reminds you to take wrist breaks, which should help you prevent or manage a repetitive stress injury. It pops up an X window when you should rest; you click on that window, then take a break. Xwrits's graphics are brightly colored pictures of a wrist and the attached hand. The wrist clenches and stretches ``as if in pain'' when you should rest, slumps relaxed during the break, and points forward valiantly when the break is over. It is trapped behind bars while the keyboard is locked. Other gestures are included. Extensive command line options let you control how often xwrits appears. It can escalate its behavior over time -- by putting up more flashing windows or actually locking you out of the keyboard, for example -- which makes it harder to cheat. (This is my first package and I'm looking for a sponsor) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 29 14:28:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 10:28:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193479] Review Request: xwrits In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605291428.k4TESx0T030460@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xwrits https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193479 jlayton at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 29 14:34:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 10:34:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193154] Review Request: asymptote - Descriptive vector graphics language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605291434.k4TEYwAU030627@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: asymptote - Descriptive vector graphics language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193154 ------- Additional Comments From jpo at di.uminho.pt 2006-05-29 10:27 EST ------- The texinfo package has been splitted in Fedora Core 6. FC-5(texinfo) = FC-6(texinfo, texinfo-tex) Changed the build requirement BuildRequires: texinfo to BuildRequires: /usr/bin/texi2dvi jpo -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 29 14:37:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 10:37:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193480] New: Review Request: sunifdef Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193480 Summary: Review Request: sunifdef Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: jonathan.underwood at gmail.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://physics.open.ac.uk/~ju83/sunifdef.spec SRPM URL: http://physics.open.ac.uk/~ju83/sunifdef-1.0-1.src.rpm Description: Sunifdef is a commandline tool for simplifying the preprocessor conditionals in source code (\#if and related directives) based on the the user's chosen interpretation of the preprocessor symbols. It is a more powerful successor to the FreeBSD 'unifdef' tool. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 29 14:38:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 10:38:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193446] Review Request: GLiv: OpenGL image viewer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605291438.k4TEcd3D030861@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: GLiv: OpenGL image viewer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193446 ------- Additional Comments From madcat at mymadcat.com 2006-05-29 10:31 EST ------- Sorry for the 404... The URL for the spec file is good, however the SRPM is http://mymadcat.com/gliv-1.9.5-1.src.rpm (SPEC file is still http://mymadcat.com/gliv.spec) Also, this package depends on gtkglext -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 29 15:02:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 11:02:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192430] Review Request: python-kiwi - Framework for Python GUI applications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605291502.k4TF2E2B032120@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-kiwi - Framework for Python GUI applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192430 jpmahowald at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |jpmahowald at gmail.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2006-05-29 10:54 EST ------- Doesn't build on x86_64, doesn't package the following files: /usr/lib64/python2.4/site-packages/gazpacho/widgets/kiwiwidgets.py /usr/lib64/python2.4/site-packages/gazpacho/widgets/kiwiwidgets.pyc /usr/lib64/python2.4/site-packages/gazpacho/widgets/kiwiwidgets.pyo The thing is, changing get_python_lib() to get_python_lib(1) won't work for the other kiwi files. Perhaps define two sitelib macros? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 29 15:31:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 11:31:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187292] Review Request: gecko-sharp In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605291531.k4TFVYZa000569@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gecko-sharp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187292 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776, 187621 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 29 15:31:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 11:31:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187621] Review Request: blam In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605291531.k4TFVkJT000622@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: blam https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187621 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn|187292 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 29 15:33:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 11:33:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 186391] Review Request: 855resolution - Change video bios resolutions on laptops with Intel graphic chipsets In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605291533.k4TFXWNd000769@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: 855resolution - Change video bios resolutions on laptops with Intel graphic chipsets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=186391 ------- Additional Comments From jonathan.underwood at gmail.com 2006-05-29 11:25 EST ------- Note that 855resolution seems to be superceded by 915resolution: http://www.geocities.com/stomljen/ Regarding non-inclusion on the grounds (comment #3) that it's hacking the bios - well, the upstream xorg driver will still be using the same techniques to hack the video bios - I don't see that one is more evil than the other :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 29 15:40:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 11:40:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188574] Review Request: rss-glx -- Really Slick Screensavers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605291540.k4TFeU8n001436@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rss-glx -- Really Slick Screensavers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188574 ------- Additional Comments From nphilipp at redhat.com 2006-05-29 11:32 EST ------- (In reply to comment #18) > Debuginfo rpm contains broken symlinks. > > ./rss-glx_0.8.1.p/oglc_src/driver.cpp > ./rss-glx_0.8.1.p/other_src/driver.c > ./rss-glx_0.8.1.p/reallyslick/c_src/driver.c > ./rss-glx_0.8.1.p/reallyslick/cpp_src/driver.cpp > > All of these are broken. This is a bug in rpmbuild debuginfo creation, see bug #189928. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 29 15:56:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 11:56:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193224] Review Request: streamer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605291556.k4TFuVIZ002289@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: streamer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193224 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-05-29 11:48 EST ------- (In reply to comment #7) > I updated Release number and added a ChangeLog entry in it. Updated files are at > Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/pnemade/Qcwebcam/streamer.spec > SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/pnemade/Qcwebcam/streamer-1.1-3.fc5.src.rpm Thanks. What appears to have happened now is that upstream (you) have released a new tarball at version 1.1 that contains the GPL file, which was not the case with the version 1.1 tarball I last looked at. *Please* don't release new tarballs with the same version numbers as previous releases - that's a really bad habit to get into. You've fixed the unowned directory by adding the following line to %files: %{_libdir}/streamer/ This tells RPM to include that directory and everything underneath it, which results in lots of "file included twice" warnings when the package is built. To avoid this, do either: %{_libdir}/streamer/ (which will include everything from that directory downwards), or %dir %{_libdir}/streamer/ plus all the individual files that you currently list in the %files section. The %dir tag tells RPM to include the directory but not its contents. The build process produces quite a lot of compiler warnings. Most of these can be ignored, but these warrant investigation I think: console/capture.c: In function 'movie_writer_stop': console/capture.c:528: warning: integer constant is too large for 'long' type console/capture.c:533: warning: integer constant is too large for 'long' type console/capture.c: In function 'movie_print_timestamps': console/capture.c:588: warning: integer constant is too large for 'long' type console/capture.c:588: warning: integer constant is too large for 'long' type console/capture.c: In function 'movie_grab_put_video': console/capture.c:624: warning: integer constant is too large for 'long' type In order to get sponsored, you will need to demonstrate to a potential sponsor that you are familiar with the Fedora Extras processes and standards. The best way of doing this is to review other people's packages. Doing this can also be a useful learning experience for yourself, as you're likely to pick up tips from other packages and review comments. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 29 16:04:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 12:04:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188574] Review Request: rss-glx -- Really Slick Screensavers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605291604.k4TG41YT002490@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rss-glx -- Really Slick Screensavers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188574 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-05-29 11:56 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=130194) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=130194&action=view) Some fixes for rss-glx.spec I am very glad that rss-glx is packaged in fedora-extras, Thanks!! Now: A. I agree with comment 11 by Jason Tibbitts that binary file should be located on %{_libexecdir}/xscreensaver. B. As I have commented on comment 18, debuginfo includes some broken symlinks. C. Compilation options does not follow ${RPM_OPT_FLAGS}. Please consider my patch for rss-glx.spec . -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 29 16:14:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 12:14:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188574] Review Request: rss-glx -- Really Slick Screensavers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605291614.k4TGEuPT002788@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rss-glx -- Really Slick Screensavers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188574 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-05-29 12:07 EST ------- Hello, Nils. For symlink problem, I received your comment #19 by mail AFTER I posted #20. Sorry for not recognizing your comment. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 29 16:59:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 12:59:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187621] Review Request: blam In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605291659.k4TGxOVm004346@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: blam https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187621 foolish at guezz.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 29 17:00:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 13:00:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193154] Review Request: asymptote - Descriptive vector graphics language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605291700.k4TH0Ncf004428@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: asymptote - Descriptive vector graphics language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193154 ------- Additional Comments From gemi at bluewin.ch 2006-05-29 12:52 EST ------- (In reply to comment #13) > Do you mind if I send the emacs init file upstream? No Problem. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 29 17:18:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 13:18:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177081] Review Request: nucleo In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605291718.k4THIH9x004779@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nucleo https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177081 ------- Additional Comments From luya_tfz at thefinalzone.com 2006-05-29 13:10 EST ------- Could you open a new bugzilla and link it to this version? Once you did, I will close the current one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 29 17:21:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 13:21:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193319] Review Request: chestnut-dialer - A PPP dialing program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605291721.k4THLR00004864@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: chestnut-dialer - A PPP dialing program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193319 ------- Additional Comments From lostclus at ua.fm 2006-05-29 13:13 EST ------- Spec URL: http://lostclus.linux.kiev.ua/files/chestnut-dialer.spec SRPM URL: http://lostclus.linux.kiev.ua/files/chestnut-dialer-0.3.2-4.src.rpm * Mon May 29 2006 Konstantin Korikov - 0.3.2-4 - Patch to resolve problems with some locales like uk_UA and ru_UA I still seeking a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 29 17:38:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 13:38:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191922] Review Request: dbus-qt: Qt-based library for using D-BUS In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605291738.k4THcO4t005268@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dbus-qt: Qt-based library for using D-BUS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191922 ------- Additional Comments From dennis at ausil.us 2006-05-29 13:30 EST ------- [dennis at files ~]$ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-4-x86_64-core/result/dbus-qt-0.33-4.x86_64.rpm W: dbus-qt invalid-license AFL/GPL E: dbus-qt library-without-ldconfig-postin /usr/lib64/libdbus-qt-1.so.1.0.0 E: dbus-qt library-without-ldconfig-postun /usr/lib64/libdbus-qt-1.so.1.0.0 need %post -p /sbin/ldconfig %postun -p /sbin/ldconfig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 29 18:08:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 14:08:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193479] Review Request: xwrits In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605291808.k4TI8pwY005852@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xwrits https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193479 ------- Additional Comments From jonathan.underwood at gmail.com 2006-05-29 14:01 EST ------- Hello Jeffrey, Not yet a proper review, but a couple of points: 1) Use the dist tag: Release: 1%{?dist} 2) Why not use %setup -q, as is standard 3) Use either $RPM_BUILD_ROOT or %{buildroot}, and do it consistently, don't mix and match - choose one and stick to it. 4) There should be a rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT at the beginning of %install 5) Consider using make %{?_smp_mflags} in build. Fix up these points and I'll run it through a mock build. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 29 18:21:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 14:21:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192313] Review Request: koan In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605291821.k4TILOKd006531@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: koan https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192313 ------- Additional Comments From jonathan.underwood at gmail.com 2006-05-29 14:13 EST ------- A couple of quick comments: 1) The three macros at the top of the file are totally redundant. 2) Remove Vendor tag. 3) Relaease should contain the dist tag 4) The Prefix tag seems redundant ( I may be missing something there tho). 5) the install section should begin with rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 29 18:56:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 14:56:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190343] Review Request: VDR - Video Disk Recorder In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605291856.k4TIueGu009572@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: VDR - Video Disk Recorder https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190343 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2006-05-29 14:49 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > Sorry for the delay... NP, should the blocker be moved from FE-NEW to FE-REVIEW? ;) > use everywhere the '%__XXXX' macros, or everywhere only 'XXXX'. Done (the latter). > | BuildRequires: glibc-kernheaders >= 2.4-9.1.94 > is unneeded; every target system has this version of the > glibc-kernheaders package Dropped altogether per https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-maintainers/2006-May/msg00071.html > | Requires: udev > should be > | Requires(pre): udev > | Requires(postun): udev Disagreed. Even if for some obscure reason udev would be installed after vdr (already a very unlikely case), neither will automatically start during the transaction, and after the transaction udev is available and has changed the dir ownerships so it doesn't matter. > (or '/etc/udev/rules.d' instead of 'udev') We really need udev instead of the dir, so I'm leaving that as is. > please use 'fedora-usermgt' for the 'vdr' user and 'video' group. I'm not going to add a dependency on fedora-usermgmt (not parroting my opinions about it here, as I've already done that several times on mailing lists). If you think testing for availability of the f-u scripts and using them in %pre if available would be useful, I could be persuaded to do that. But I'd rather leave that stuff out altogether. > On the other side, 'vdr' has some history and not using 'vdr' might > cause other problems Seconded, left as is. > * ownership/location of the vdr configuration directory is another > problem. I dislike the vdr:video owned /etc/vdr directory somehow > because: > * some configuration data is modified by the 'vdr' daemon (channels.conf, > remote.conf, setup.conf) so it should be located in /var/lib/vdr Kind of agreed, but this package has an existing user base and I don't see too good ways to migrate it on upgrades and would not at all want to break existing setups either. Do you have ideas how that could be done? > * not all configuration data should be modifiable by the daemon > (e.g. commands.conf) so permissions should should be root:video. Do you mean for the config dir, and if yes, root:video 0755 or 0775? What about subdirs there? The former would require going through quite a bit of code and ensuring that the daemon and its plugins operate in a way that they'd still work without having write access to the affected dirs, and the latter might be too relaxed. Doing the former and patching where needed would be a good thing to do, but I think it's somewhat out of scope for the package's acceptance. > | SUBSYSTEM=="input", SYSFS{../name}=="DVB on-card IR receiver", SYMLINK+="input/event-remote", GROUP="video", MODE="0660" Added as an example to the udev rules file. One thing outside of this list I'm considering to do is to rename the "runvdr" script to something else; while it's somewhat compatible with the upstream runvdr example, it doesn't implement the implied functionality (auto-restart on certain exit codes, reloading of DVB modules). Or implementing at least some of that in the version shipped with the package. Thoughts? http://cachalot.mine.nu/5/SRPMS/vdr-1.4.0-5.src.rpm * Mon May 29 2006 Ville Skytt? - 1.4.0-5 - Address some review notes in #190343 comment 2: - Add example udev rule for predictable remote control device naming. - Drop glibc-kernheaders build dependency. - Specfile cleanups. * Sun May 28 2006 Ville Skytt? - 1.4.0-4 - Apply upstream 1.4.0-2 maintenance patch. * Sun May 14 2006 Ville Skytt? - 1.4.0-3 - Apply upstream 1.4.0-1 maintenance patch. - Drop unneeded version check from %%check. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 29 19:16:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 15:16:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191922] Review Request: dbus-qt: Qt-based library for using D-BUS In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605291916.k4TJG9ul009928@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dbus-qt: Qt-based library for using D-BUS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191922 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-05-29 15:08 EST ------- Added %%post/%%postun -p /sbin/ldconfig FC-5: Spec URL: http://kde-redhat.unl.edu/apt/kde-redhat/SPECS/dbus-qt-0.61.spec SRPM URL: http://kde-redhat.unl.edu/apt/kde-redhat/all/SRPMS.stable/dbus-qt-0.61-2.src.rpm FC-4: Spec URL: http://kde-redhat.unl.edu/apt/kde-redhat/SPECS/dbus-qt-0.33.spec SRPM URL: http://kde-redhat.unl.edu/apt/kde-redhat/all/SRPMS.stable/dbus-qt-0.33-5.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 29 19:34:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 15:34:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193493] New: Review Request: iksemel - An XML parser library designed for Jabber applications Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193493 Summary: Review Request: iksemel - An XML parser library designed for Jabber applications Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: jeff at ollie.clive.ia.us QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.ocjtech.us/iksemel-1.2-1.spec SRPM URL: http://www.ocjtech.us/iksemel-1.2-1.src.rpm Description: An XML parser library designed for Jabber applications. It is coded in ANSI C for POSIX compatible environments, thus highly portable. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 29 20:49:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 16:49:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193479] Review Request: xwrits In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605292049.k4TKnHV1013174@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xwrits https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193479 ------- Additional Comments From jlayton at redhat.com 2006-05-29 16:41 EST ------- Thanks for having a look. I've made the changes you recommended most were pretty straightforward. The only one that wasn't was adding %{?_smp_mflags} to make. I don't have an SMP box handy to test how well that works for this package. I'll plan to test it on one tomorrow though Let me know if you see any other problems. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 29 21:28:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 17:28:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192420] Review Request: Bonfire - CD/DVD burning app for gnome In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605292128.k4TLSakY014056@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Bonfire - CD/DVD burning app for gnome https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192420 jpmahowald at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |jpmahowald at gmail.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2006-05-29 17:21 EST ------- Downloaded source and srpm source don't match. These need to. md5sums: db94c7ae5ac5c27cf7d66fafc3654f4f bonfire-0.3.1.tar.bz2 (downloaded) 9e2cf4235be0a149f2dab2734e1b2c2a bonfire-0.3.1.tar.bz2 (srpm) Duplicate BuildRequires, courtesy the magic fedora-qa script: glib2-devel (by gtk2-devel), libxml2-devel (by GConf2-devel), gtk2-devel (by libgnomeui-devel), gnome-vfs2-devel (by libgnomeui-devel), GConf2-devel (by libgnomeui-devel), libgnome-devel (by libgnomeui-devel), dbus-devel (by hal-devel) rpmlint: E: bonfire description-line-too-long Bonfire is a CD/DVD burning application for the gnome desktop designed to be simple and easy to use. Your description lines must not exceed 79 characters. If a line is exceeding this number, cut it to fit in two lines. W: bonfire incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.3.0-1 0.3.1-1.fc6 Your last entry in %changelog contains a version that is not coherent with the current version of your package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 29 21:32:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 17:32:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193210] Review Request: htmldoc - Convert HTML source files into HTML, PostScript, or PDF In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605292132.k4TLWo9S014197@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: htmldoc - Convert HTML source files into HTML, PostScript, or PDF https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193210 ------- Additional Comments From gauret at free.fr 2006-05-29 17:25 EST ------- Almost there ! * Missing dependancy on update-desktop-database for %post and %postun (package desktop-file-utils) * Since you're rebuilding, the last 3 lines in the desktop-file-install call are not properly lined-up (tabs instead of spaces) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 29 22:12:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 18:12:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 185359] Review Request: kchm - CHM file viewer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605292212.k4TMCFia015470@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kchm - CHM file viewer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=185359 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|fedora-extras- |fedora-package- |list at redhat.com |review at redhat.com jpmahowald at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |jpmahowald at gmail.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2006-05-29 18:04 EST ------- Not building. Cannot find build req libchmxx-devel What package is supposed to provide that? I assume the .la libtool files are necessary. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 29 22:23:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 18:23:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193499] New: Review Request: XPad - A sticky notes application Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193499 Summary: Review Request: XPad - A sticky notes application Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: peter at thecodergeek.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.thecodergeek.com/downloads/fedora/xpad.spec SRPM URL: http://www.thecodergeek.com/downloads/fedora/xpad-2.11-1.src.rpm Description: XPad is a utility for creating and managing sticky notes on your desktop. It is lightweight, fault-tolerant, and very customizable. It is made using GTK+ and is compliant with various FreeDesktop.org standards. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 29 22:36:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 18:36:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191016] Review Request: svn-client-adapter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605292236.k4TMagUu016119@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: svn-client-adapter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191016 ------- Additional Comments From bkonrath at redhat.com 2006-05-29 18:29 EST ------- Thnaks, I think we should close this bug now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 29 22:38:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 18:38:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191017] Review Request: subclipse In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605292238.k4TMcFkv016229@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: subclipse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191017 ------- Additional Comments From bkonrath at redhat.com 2006-05-29 18:30 EST ------- Nice work here. I'm in the process of making an update to Eclipse in FC5 that will contain the package build stuff. I should have it out tomorrow or Wed. I'll post a message here when it has been released. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 29 22:44:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 18:44:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187430] Review Request: elektra In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605292244.k4TMivGh016743@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: elektra https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187430 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-05-29 18:37 EST ------- rpmlint output: E: elektra configure-without-libdir-spec I don't understand this one. W: elektra devel-file-in-non-devel-package /lib/libelektra-default.so Safe to ignore - as long as having dlopened libs in /lib is accepted, as it is a link to a dlopened lib. E: elektra script-without-shellbang /usr/share/doc/elektra-0.6.1/scripts/convert-hwconfKudzu The shellbang should be #!/usr/bin/perl and if you want to avoid the dependency on perl, you should chmod -x E: elektra-devel no-ldconfig-symlink /usr/lib/libelektratools.so E: elektra-devel no-ldconfig-symlink /usr/lib/libelektra.so This should be acted upon (those should be symlinks and not files). E: elektra invalid-soname /lib/libelektra-filesys.so libelektra-filesys.so E: elektra invalid-soname /lib/libelektra-fstab.so libelektra-fstab.so E: elektra-backend-berkeleydb invalid-soname /lib/libelektra-berkeleydb.so libelektra-berkeleydb.so That's strange. They seems to me to be acceptable sonames for dlopened libs. Maybe it is an error that happens when dlopened libs are put in standard library directories. As said in a comment above, putting those dlopened libs in /lib/elektra/ should be much better. W: elektra-backend-berkeleydb no-documentation Safe to ignore. > > other comments: > > * --prefix=%{_prefix} and --exec-prefix=/ were unneeded in my tests > > This is correct. If removed, software won't be installed in /bin and /lib I guess you wanted to say incorrect. But it is not incorrect, the software is installed in /bin and /lib thanks to --bindir=/bin \ --libdir=/%{_lib} \ Have a look at the resulting variables in config.log. > The key.3.gz conflict was also removed. There is still /bin/kdb, kdb.{1,3}, kdb.h which are somehow generic but could be acceptable. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 29 22:49:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 18:49:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187430] Review Request: elektra In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605292249.k4TMnenS017052@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: elektra https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187430 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-05-29 18:42 EST ------- There aren't many different compile warnings, it would be nice to have them fixed (upstream if possible). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 29 23:20:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 19:20:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192564] Review Request: uuid In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605292320.k4TNKLc1017630@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: uuid https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192564 steve at silug.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From steve at silug.org 2006-05-29 19:12 EST ------- Imported into CVS, branches created, and builds requested. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 29 23:20:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 19:20:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192575] Review Request: perl-Pipeline In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605292320.k4TNKiXp017672@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Pipeline https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192575 Bug 192575 depends on bug 192564, which changed state. Bug 192564 Summary: Review Request: uuid https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192564 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 29 23:21:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 19:21:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191545] Review Request: perl-Net-Jabber In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605292321.k4TNL5Uu017696@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-Jabber https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191545 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-05-29 19:13 EST ------- Some bad stuff from the test suite: t/2_client....................ok 4/5 skipped: Cannot open connection (maybe a firewall?) t/protocol_definenamespace....Cannot resolve compute20.math.uh.edu: at /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/XML/Stream.pm line 406. # Looks like you planned 70 tests but only ran 1. # Looks like your test died just after 1. dubious Test returned status 255 (wstat 65280, 0xff00) DIED. FAILED tests 2-70 Failed 69/70 tests, 1.43% okay t/protocol_muc................Cannot resolve compute20.math.uh.edu: at /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/XML/Stream.pm line 406. # Looks like you planned 4 tests but only ran 1. # Looks like your test died just after 1. dubious Test returned status 255 (wstat 65280, 0xff00) DIED. FAILED tests 2-4 Failed 3/4 tests, 25.00% okay t/protocol_rpc................Cannot resolve compute20.math.uh.edu: at /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/XML/Stream.pm line 406. # Looks like you planned 19 tests but only ran 1. # Looks like your test died just after 1. dubious Test returned status 255 (wstat 65280, 0xff00) DIED. FAILED tests 2-19 Failed 18/19 tests, 5.26% okay t/query_time..................ok 1/39 skipped: Time::Timezone not installed For that last one, you should add perl(Time::Timezone) to your BuildRequires: set. For the failing tests, your options are to disable those tests or to disable the entire test suite. Doing the latter would be a shame because there's plenty of test suite that can be run. Disabling the failing tests is easy: just add this at the beginning of %check: # Disable tests which will fail under mock rm t/protocol_definenamespace.t rm t/protocol_muc.t rm t/protocol_rpc.t I'll do this so that I can build and complete this review. Once built, rpmlint has some complaints: E: perl-Net-Jabber script-without-shellbang /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/Net/Jabber/Dialback/Result.pm This is fixed by removing execute permission from that file. E: perl-Net-Jabber script-without-shellbang /usr/share/doc/perl-Net-Jabber-2.0/examples/component_test.pl E: perl-Net-Jabber script-without-shellbang /usr/share/doc/perl-Net-Jabber-2.0/examples/component_accept.pl W: perl-Net-Jabber doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/perl-Net-Jabber-2.0/examples/rpc_client.pl /bin/sh W: perl-Net-Jabber doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/perl-Net-Jabber-2.0/examples/rpc_server.pl /bin/sh Documentation should not be executable, so you need to remove execute permissions from these files as well. Review: * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * dist tag is present. * license field matches the actual licenses (as "clarified" by the author). * license is open source-compatible. License texts included in package. * source files match upstream: 1fd348fb9a1a6c5a167ae862ed89cd53 Net-Jabber-2.0.tar.gz 1fd348fb9a1a6c5a167ae862ed89cd53 Net-Jabber-2.0.tar.gz-srpm * latest version is being packaged. O BuildRequires are proper (BR: perl is on the exception list). O package builds in mock (development, x86_64) after disabling tests as above. X rpmlint is silent. X final provides and requires are sane (doc files pull in /bin/sh which should not be there). * no shared libraries are present. * package is not relocatable. owns the directories it creates. doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. no duplicates in %files. X file permission issues; some files are executable that shouldn't be. * %clean is present. O %check is present and all tests pass (once failing tests are disabled and perl(Time::Timezone is added to BR:): All tests successful, 4 subtests skipped. Files=46, Tests=3283, 33 wallclock secs (10.03 cusr + 2.15 csys = 12.18 CPU) * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no libtool .la droppings. * not a GUI app. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 30 00:14:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 20:14:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192575] Review Request: perl-Pipeline In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605300014.k4U0ExkJ020190@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Pipeline https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192575 steve at silug.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From steve at silug.org 2006-05-29 20:07 EST ------- Imported into CVS, branches created, and builds requested. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 30 00:15:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 20:15:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192577] Review Request: perl-OpenFrame In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605300015.k4U0FK2R020211@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-OpenFrame https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192577 Bug 192577 depends on bug 192575, which changed state. Bug 192575 Summary: Review Request: perl-Pipeline https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192575 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 30 01:46:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 21:46:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 174021] Review Request: aplus-fsf - Advanced APL Interpreter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605300146.k4U1kUav023098@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aplus-fsf - Advanced APL Interpreter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174021 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-05-29 21:38 EST ------- Anything happening with this ticket? The SRPM is corrupt and this package has little chance of building on FC5 or development because of modular X issues. It shouldn't be hard to fix, but first we'd have to see a clean SRPM. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 30 02:54:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 22:54:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193210] Review Request: htmldoc - Convert HTML source files into HTML, PostScript, or PDF In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605300254.k4U2slqB027593@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: htmldoc - Convert HTML source files into HTML, PostScript, or PDF https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193210 ------- Additional Comments From adam at spicenitz.org 2006-05-29 22:46 EST ------- Ok, I've fixed the desktop-file-install line-up problem. I can add the dependencies for %post and %postun, but is that still a problem? It looks like desktop-file-utils fixed bug #180898 in 0.10-5 and 0.10-6. Do I need to add the dependencies for FC4? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 30 03:08:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 23:08:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193529] New: Review Request: radiusclient-ng - RADIUS protocol client library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193529 Summary: Review Request: radiusclient-ng - RADIUS protocol client library Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: jeff at ollie.clive.ia.us QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.ocjtech.us/radiusclient-ng-0.5.2-1.spec SRPM URL: http://www.ocjtech.us/radiusclient-ng-0.5.2-1.src.rpm Description: Portable, easy-to-use and standard compliant library suitable for developing free and commercial software that need support for a RADIUS protocol (RFCs 2128 and 2139). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 30 03:47:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 23:47:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191922] Review Request: dbus-qt: Qt-based library for using D-BUS In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605300347.k4U3lqGi031068@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dbus-qt: Qt-based library for using D-BUS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191922 ------- Additional Comments From dennis at ausil.us 2006-05-29 23:40 EST ------- - MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. W: dbus-qt invalid-license AFL/GPL OK - MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK - MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec dbus-qt-0.61.spec is ok for review since there is two different versions but must be changed when imported - MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines. OK - MUST: The package must be licensed with an open-source compatible license and meet other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. OK - MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. OK http://dbus.freedesktop.org/doc/dbus-faq.html says both GPL and AFL - MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. OK this is done - MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. OK - MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. OK - MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. cfd4f26004e4304e0dace4d82894e50b dbus-0.61.tar.gz cfd4f26004e4304e0dace4d82894e50b ../SOURCES/dbus-0.61.tar.gz 23db7f95dbb1fcae6e1d43fcc17857aa dbus-0.33.tar.gz 23db7f95dbb1fcae6e1d43fcc17857aa ../SOURCES/dbus-0.33.tar.gz OK - MUST: The package must successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. built in mock on X86_64 and i386 - MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires. OK - MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden. OK no langs - MUST: If the package contains shared library files located in the dynamic linker's default paths, that package must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. If the package has multiple subpackages with libraries, each subpackage should also have a %post/%postun section that calls /sbin/ldconfig. An example of the correct syntax for this is: %post -p /sbin/ldconfig %postun -p /sbin/ldconfig OK this is done - MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker. OK not relocatable - MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. NOT OK package creates no directories but does not require dbus - MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. OK - MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. OK - MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). OK - MUST: Each package must consistently use macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines. OK - MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. This is described in detail in the code vs. content section of Packaging Guidelines. OK - MUST: Large documentation files should go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity) OK not applicable - MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. OK - MUST: Header files or static libraries must be in a -devel package. OK devel package contains the correct files - MUST: Files used by pkgconfig (.pc files) must be in a -devel package. OK no use of pkgconfig - MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. OK done - MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. OK - MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these should be removed in the spec. OK removed from package - MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file No .desktop files ok - MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. OK Package needs to require dbus-%{version} and have spec file names meet the standard dbus-qt.spec Then this is APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 30 04:07:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 May 2006 00:07:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187430] Review Request: elektra In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605300407.k4U47eof031536@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: elektra https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187430 ------- Additional Comments From avi at unix.sh 2006-05-30 00:00 EST ------- Check update on http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/elektra/elektra-0.6.1-32.src.rpm The rpmlint output is almost empty now. > E: elektra script-without-shellbang > /usr/share/doc/elektra-0.6.1/scripts/convert-hwconfKudzu > > The shellbang should be > #!/usr/bin/perl > and if you want to avoid the dependency on perl, you should > chmod -x Fixed. Thanks. > E: elektra-devel no-ldconfig-symlink /usr/lib/libelektratools.so > E: elektra-devel no-ldconfig-symlink /usr/lib/libelektra.so > > This should be acted upon (those should be symlinks and not > files). Fixed. I did this on spec: rm $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_lib}/libelektra.so ln -sf ../../%{_lib}/libelektra.so.2 $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_libdir}/libelektra.so Any suggestion for a cleaner way without hardcoding the lib version ? > > > other comments: > > > * --prefix=%{_prefix} and --exec-prefix=/ were unneeded in my tests > > > > This is correct. If removed, software won't be installed in /bin and /lib > > I guess you wanted to say incorrect. But it is not incorrect, the > software is installed in /bin and /lib thanks to > --bindir=/bin \ > --libdir=/%{_lib} \ Fixed. Thanks. Most warnings are due to some bug in the build system claiming "warning: implicit declaration of function 'usleep'". They are sort of fake, and will be fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 30 04:48:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 May 2006 00:48:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193224] Review Request: streamer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605300448.k4U4mMqD032763@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: streamer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193224 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-05-30 00:40 EST ------- paul, I didnt get what u mean by >Thanks. What appears to have happened now is that upstream (you) have released a >new tarball at version 1.1 that contains the GPL file, which was not the case >with the version 1.1 tarball I last looked at. *Please* don't release new >tarballs with the same version numbers as previous releases - that's a really >bad habit to get into. Also i solved rpmbuild "file included twice" warnings and some other warnings. Other signedness warnings are ok as they are compiler specific. Same warnings are not coming on FC4 and RHEL systems. Do i need to update to new release number. if yes why?? i only solved warnings not added any feature. I updated SPEC file and rebuild RPM. Updated files are at Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/pnemade/Qcwebcam/streamer.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/pnemade/Qcwebcam/streamer-1.1-3.fc5.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 30 06:59:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 May 2006 02:59:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189268] Review Request: xscreensaver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605300659.k4U6xvvL005193@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xscreensaver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189268 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE OtherBugsDependingO| |169107 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-05-30 02:52 EST ------- Now I close this bug as CLOSED NEXTRELEASE. Okay, xscreensaver-5.00-1.fc6 was released in FE-devel. I won't release xscreensaver-5.00-1.fc5 in FE-5 because FC-5 has xscreensaver 4.24 -2. Ray, please remove xscreensaver 4.24-2 from FC-devel. Perhaps by FC6-T1, we can completely move xscreensaver from FC to FE. I thank very much to all the people for helping me a lot about this issue. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 30 07:00:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 May 2006 03:00:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 174866] Review Request: polypaudio: Improved Linux sound server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605300700.k4U70rgL005307@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: polypaudio: Improved Linux sound server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174866 ------- Additional Comments From drzeus-bugzilla at drzeus.cx 2006-05-30 02:53 EST ------- Spec Name or Url: http://homes.drzeus.cx/~drzeus/polypaudio/polypaudio.spec SRPM Name or Url: http://homes.drzeus.cx/~drzeus/polypaudio/polypaudio-0.9.0-2.src.rpm Fixed some rpmlint problems. Remaining warnings: polypaudio-0.9.0-2.i386.rpm: E: polypaudio setuid-binary /usr/bin/polypaudio root 04755 E: polypaudio non-standard-executable-perm /usr/bin/polypaudio 04755 E: polypaudio non-executable-script /etc/polypaudio/default.pa 0644 polypaudio-devel-0.9.0-2.i386.rpm: W: polypaudio-devel no-documentation polypaudio-lib-glib-0.9.0-2.i386.rpm: W: polypaudio-lib-glib no-documentation polypaudio-lib-glib2-0.9.0-2.i386.rpm: W: polypaudio-lib-glib2 no-documentation polypaudio-module-alsa-0.9.0-2.i386.rpm: W: polypaudio-module-alsa no-documentation polypaudio-module-lirc-0.9.0-2.i386.rpm: W: polypaudio-module-lirc no-documentation polypaudio-module-x11-0.9.0-2.i386.rpm: W: polypaudio-module-x11 no-documentation polypaudio-utils-0.9.0-2.i386.rpm: E: polypaudio-utils invalid-soname /usr/lib/libpolypdsp.so libpolypdsp.so W: polypaudio-utils no-documentation -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 30 07:05:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 May 2006 03:05:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193531] New: Review Request: kicad - Electronic schematic diagrams and printed circuit board artwork Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193531 Summary: Review Request: kicad - Electronic schematic diagrams and printed circuit board artwork Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: aportal at univ-montp2.fr QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://linuxelectronique.free.fr/download/fedora/4/SPECS/kicad.spec SRPM URL: http://linuxelectronique.free.fr/download/fedora/4/SRPMS/kicad-2006-04-24-0-3.src.rpm Description: Kicad is an open source (GPL) software for the creation of electronic schematic diagrams and printed circuit board artwork up to 16 layers. Kicad is a set of four softwares and a project manager: - Eeschema: schematic entry - Pcbnew: board editor - Gerbview: GERBER viewer (photoplotter documents) - Cvpcb: footprint selector for components used in the circuit design - Kicad: project manager -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 30 08:01:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 May 2006 04:01:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193210] Review Request: htmldoc - Convert HTML source files into HTML, PostScript, or PDF In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605300801.k4U81xUX010191@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: htmldoc - Convert HTML source files into HTML, PostScript, or PDF https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193210 ------- Additional Comments From gauret at free.fr 2006-05-30 03:54 EST ------- Ah, that's true, I didn't know. In the bug, Ray said the fix will be backported to FC4, so I think you can leave out the Requires entirely. I found a small bug: if you start the graphical frontend, and click on the "help" button, you have an error, it can't find the doc. The path is hardcoded in the configure script, line 5916. Since the new path depends on the version number, you have two options: - make a patch to change this line, and update it with each new version - change the line with a sed call in %prep, where maros such as %{version} are available I would choose the 2nd option, because it is less likely to cause errors in the future (I know *I* would forget to update the patch at least once). But make sure the regexp is sufficiently specific, this is a large file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 30 08:02:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 May 2006 04:02:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190243] Review Request: scim-bridge (gtkimm module in C) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605300802.k4U82KdD010365@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scim-bridge (gtkimm module in C) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190243 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2006-05-30 03:54 EST ------- Thanks. FE devel packages built, branches requested, and added to owners list. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 30 09:15:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 May 2006 05:15:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192490] Review Request: python-ogg - A Python wrapper for the Ogg libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605300915.k4U9FYI4015235@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-ogg - A Python wrapper for the Ogg libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192490 hugo at devin.com.br changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From hugo at devin.com.br 2006-05-30 05:07 EST ------- Imported and built. Closing. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 30 09:15:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 May 2006 05:15:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193103] Review Request: Listen In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605300915.k4U9FtwX015258@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Listen https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193103 Bug 193103 depends on bug 192490, which changed state. Bug 192490 Summary: Review Request: python-ogg - A Python wrapper for the Ogg libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192490 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 30 09:16:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 May 2006 05:16:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192491] Review Request: python-vorbis - A Python wrapper for the Ogg Vorbis audio libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605300916.k4U9GHlu015297@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-vorbis - A Python wrapper for the Ogg Vorbis audio libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192491 Bug 192491 depends on bug 192490, which changed state. Bug 192490 Summary: Review Request: python-ogg - A Python wrapper for the Ogg libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192490 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 30 09:47:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 May 2006 05:47:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 168690] Review Request: pyBackPack (GTK+ Python backup tool) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605300947.k4U9lnqs016791@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyBackPack (GTK+ Python backup tool) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=168690 ------- Additional Comments From davea at sucs.org 2006-05-30 05:40 EST ------- I didn't apply for SoC 2006 and nobody has picked up pyBackPack's development - consider it dead. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 30 10:14:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 May 2006 06:14:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 168719] Review Request: gdal In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605301014.k4UAE4IL017981@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gdal https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=168719 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2006-05-30 06:06 EST ------- Ignacio, are you still reviewing this review request? I think this PR has exceeded all reasonable limits and should be closed now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 30 10:26:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 May 2006 06:26:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187430] Review Request: elektra In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605301026.k4UAQXZa018633@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: elektra https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187430 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-05-30 06:18 EST ------- > I did this on spec: > rm $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_lib}/libelektra.so > ln -sf ../../%{_lib}/libelektra.so.2 $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_libdir}/libelektra.so > > Any suggestion for a cleaner way without hardcoding the lib version ? ln -sf ../../%{_lib}/libelektra.so.? $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_libdir}/libelektra.so > Most warnings are due to some bug in the build system claiming "warning: > implicit declaration of function 'usleep'". They are sort of fake, and will be > fixed. Wha do you mean by "They are sort of fake"? I had a look at the code, and indeed in keyset.c usleep is used although there is no #include (maybe conditionalized on HAVE_UNISTD_H, with AC_CHECK_HEADERS(unistd.h)) As a side note, in case you weren't aware, in the usleep man page, there is: This function is obsolete. Use nanosleep(2) or setitimer(2) instead. Anyway I don't have any other comments. I believe the package is in shape now, so now you should look for a sponsor who accepts the dlopened libs in /lib and the header files directly in /usr/include... Or be prepared to fix those issues. To look for a sponsor, the best is to show that you have enough knowledge of the packaging guidelines to have CVS access granted to you, and the best for that is to participate in other packages reviews, by comenting and sending patches for specfiles. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 30 10:30:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 May 2006 06:30:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187282] Review Request: sax2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605301030.k4UAUqHf018853@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sax2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187282 marcus-schaefer at gmx.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- URL| |http://sax.berlios.de ------- Additional Comments From marcus-schaefer at gmx.net 2006-05-30 06:23 EST ------- yes readline is required. I added the package to the BuildRequires. If you don't mind try again: ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/sax/review/sax2-8.1-70.src.rpm I was able to build it on my test machine with FC5 installed. Packages can be found on berlios ftp as well. Thanks for your effort I'm hopping you will be successful the next time -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 30 10:31:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 May 2006 06:31:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193103] Review Request: Listen In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605301031.k4UAVnvk018937@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Listen https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193103 hugo at devin.com.br changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |hugo at devin.com.br ------- Additional Comments From hugo at devin.com.br 2006-05-30 06:24 EST ------- I just imported python-ogg and python-vorbis. Now it can have the proper dependencies satisfied. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 30 10:32:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 May 2006 06:32:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192491] Review Request: python-vorbis - A Python wrapper for the Ogg Vorbis audio libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605301032.k4UAWdji018987@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-vorbis - A Python wrapper for the Ogg Vorbis audio libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192491 hugo at devin.com.br changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From hugo at devin.com.br 2006-05-30 06:24 EST ------- Package Imported and built. Closing. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 30 10:32:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 May 2006 06:32:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193103] Review Request: Listen In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605301032.k4UAWo94019007@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Listen https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193103 Bug 193103 depends on bug 192491, which changed state. Bug 192491 Summary: Review Request: python-vorbis - A Python wrapper for the Ogg Vorbis audio libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192491 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 30 10:43:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 May 2006 06:43:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189088] Review Request: knemo Network monitor applet. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605301043.k4UAhnWV020012@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: knemo Network monitor applet. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189088 ------- Additional Comments From hugo at devin.com.br 2006-05-30 06:35 EST ------- Thanks Rex! I followed the tips in your review and created a new release. It is now imported and built. Closing. Thanks Aurelien and all. As I realized this too late, I imported and built (with Comment #14 changes) before getting into FE-ACCEPT again (as in Comment #13). I hope a final review returns good :-) And sorry for my little mistake. Package updated: Spec URL: http://www.devin.com.br/eitch/rpm/fedora/SPECS/knemo.spec SRPM URL: http://www.devin.com.br/eitch/rpm/fedora/5/SRPMS/knemo-0.4.0-4.src.rpm Changes: - Created BuildRequires for the ifconfig and iwconfig commands, as knemo utilizes it for monitoring. - Removed addition of categories in desktop-file-install command -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 30 11:38:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 May 2006 07:38:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189088] Review Request: knemo Network monitor applet. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605301138.k4UBcgVc022184@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: knemo Network monitor applet. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189088 gauret at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From gauret at free.fr 2006-05-30 07:30 EST ------- The changes are OK, APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 30 11:46:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 May 2006 07:46:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189088] Review Request: knemo Network monitor applet. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605301146.k4UBkN6W022850@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: knemo Network monitor applet. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189088 ------- Additional Comments From hugo at devin.com.br 2006-05-30 07:38 EST ------- Ok, as I am not the original reporter of this bug, who can close it with resolution NEXTRELEASE? I can't. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 30 12:20:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 May 2006 08:20:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189088] Review Request: knemo Network monitor applet. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605301220.k4UCK0SE024607@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: knemo Network monitor applet. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189088 gauret at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 30 12:44:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 May 2006 08:44:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187243] Review Request: lazarus : IDE and RAD tool for the free pascal compiler (fpc) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605301244.k4UCiJ2Q026058@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lazarus : IDE and RAD tool for the free pascal compiler (fpc) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187243 ------- Additional Comments From joost at cnoc.nl 2006-05-30 08:36 EST ------- Upstream has released version 0.9.16. Should I update the package, or are some people busy reviewing 0.9.14, who won't like to do their work over again? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 30 12:49:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 May 2006 08:49:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191016] Review Request: svn-client-adapter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605301249.k4UCnlgZ026507@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: svn-client-adapter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191016 robert at marcanoonline.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX ------- Additional Comments From robert at marcanoonline.com 2006-05-30 08:42 EST ------- see comment #1 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 30 12:50:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 May 2006 08:50:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191017] Review Request: subclipse In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605301250.k4UCo9X7026557@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: subclipse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191017 Bug 191017 depends on bug 191016, which changed state. Bug 191016 Summary: Review Request: svn-client-adapter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191016 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |WONTFIX Status|NEW |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 30 13:19:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 May 2006 09:19:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193224] Review Request: streamer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605301319.k4UDJ0Mm027936@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: streamer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193224 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-05-30 09:11 EST ------- (In reply to comment #9) > I didnt get what u mean by > >Thanks. What appears to have happened now is that upstream (you) have released a > >new tarball at version 1.1 that contains the GPL file, which was not the case > >with the version 1.1 tarball I last looked at. *Please* don't release new > >tarballs with the same version numbers as previous releases - that's a really > >bad habit to get into. OK, I'll give examples. In your original bugzilla submission for this package you posted a URL for streamer-1.1-2.fc5.src.rpm. This SRPM contains a tarball streamer-1.1.tar.bz2. In Comment #7 you posted a URL for streamer-1.1-3.fc5.src.rpm, another SRPM, which also contains a tarball streamer-1.1.tar.bz2. However, this was different from the previous tarball of the same name because it contained an additional file, "GPL". In Comment #9 you reposted the same URL as in Comment #7, but now the SRPM at that URL contains yet another version of streamer-1.1.tar.bz2 that is different from the previous two releases. So if I refer in my review to a problem with the streamer version 1.1 release, what am I actually referring to? There are to my knowledge at least three different things that could be described as streamer version 1.1. This is terribly confusing. To avoid this confusion, follow these rules of thumb: 1. If you change the contents of a tarball, no matter how minor the change, the version number of that tarball (and hence the package containing it as well) should be increased. 2. If you change any other aspect of the package, such as a spec file, adding or changing a patch etc., the release number of the package should be increased. This ensures that there is never a case where there are two different packages with the same name but different contents. > Also i solved rpmbuild "file included twice" warnings and some other warnings. Yes, that's good. > Other signedness warnings are ok as they are compiler specific. Same warnings > are not coming on FC4 and RHEL systems. You'll need to build on FC5 or later to see some of these warnings. The ones I was most concerned about are still there: CC console/capture.o console/capture.c: In function 'ng_grabber_setformat': console/capture.c:183: warning: pointer targets in passing argument 1 of 'ng_ratio_fixup' differ in signedness console/capture.c:183: warning: pointer targets in passing argument 2 of 'ng_ratio_fixup' differ in signedness console/capture.c: In function 'movie_writer_stop': console/capture.c:528: warning: integer constant is too large for 'long' type console/capture.c:533: warning: integer constant is too large for 'long' type console/capture.c: In function 'movie_print_timestamps': console/capture.c:588: warning: integer constant is too large for 'long' type console/capture.c:588: warning: integer constant is too large for 'long' type console/capture.c: In function 'movie_grab_put_video': console/capture.c:624: warning: integer constant is too large for 'long' type > Do i need to update to new release number. if yes why?? i only solved > warnings not added any feature. The package has changed. It's a new release, different from the previous one. The release number should be increased and there should be a changelog entry describing the changes (note: the changelog in the RPM spec describes the changes to the packaging rather than the changes to the application itself - changes to the application are normally described in a changelog file in the application's tarball). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 30 13:42:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 May 2006 09:42:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191922] Review Request: dbus-qt: Qt-based library for using D-BUS In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605301342.k4UDgCrv029329@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dbus-qt: Qt-based library for using D-BUS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191922 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-05-30 09:34 EST ------- %changelog * Tue May 30 2006 Rex Dieter - Requires: dbus = %%version FC-5: Spec URL: http://kde-redhat.unl.edu/apt/kde-redhat/SPECS/dbus-qt-0.61.spec SRPM URL: http://kde-redhat.unl.edu/apt/kde-redhat/all/SRPMS.stable/dbus-qt-0.61-3.src.rpm FC-4: Spec URL: http://kde-redhat.unl.edu/apt/kde-redhat/SPECS/dbus-qt-0.33.spec SRPM URL: http://kde-redhat.unl.edu/apt/kde-redhat/all/SRPMS.stable/dbus-qt-0.33-6.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 30 13:51:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 May 2006 09:51:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191016] Review Request: svn-client-adapter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605301351.k4UDpH0b030063@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: svn-client-adapter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191016 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 30 13:54:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 May 2006 09:54:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 175282] Review Request: apollon: Filesharing client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605301354.k4UDsdx7030355@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: apollon: Filesharing client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175282 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com Bug 175282 depends on bug 170602, which changed state. Bug 170602 Summary: kdelibs: cleanup .la files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=170602 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|RAWHIDE | Status|CLOSED |NEW -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 30 13:58:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 May 2006 09:58:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191922] Review Request: dbus-qt: Qt-based library for using D-BUS In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605301358.k4UDweMM030663@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dbus-qt: Qt-based library for using D-BUS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191922 ------- Additional Comments From dennis at ausil.us 2006-05-30 09:50 EST ------- APPROVED Please correct the spec file names when you import they MUST be dbus-qt.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 30 14:25:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 May 2006 10:25:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192432] Review Request: compiz In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605301425.k4UEPtOE032399@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compiz https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192432 ------- Additional Comments From alcapcom at gmail.com 2006-05-30 10:18 EST ------- New repository because there was no enough disk space on the first place. Spec URL: http://fedoraxgl.tuxfamily.org/repository/5/SPECS/compiz.spec SRPM URL: http://fedoraxgl.tuxfamily.org/repository/5/SRPMS/compiz-1.0.0-4.src.rpm For building compiz, the control-center-devel package with 2.14.0 is requiered. Pre made package are avalable here: SRPM: http://fedoraxgl.tuxfamily.org/repository/5/SRPMS/control-center-2.14.0-1.src.rpm Spec: http://fedoraxgl.tuxfamily.org/repository/5/SPECS/control-center.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 30 14:28:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 May 2006 10:28:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193479] Review Request: xwrits In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605301428.k4UESPTe032540@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xwrits https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193479 ------- Additional Comments From jlayton at redhat.com 2006-05-30 10:20 EST ------- Tested building the SRPM with %{?_smp_mflags} and it seems to work correctly. I also made a slight change to the .desktop file to make it so that it runs xwrits with some more options. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 30 15:25:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 May 2006 11:25:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192889] Review Request: openais standards based cluster framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605301525.k4UFP1lF003593@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: openais standards based cluster framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192889 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-05-30 11:17 EST ------- "man openais_overview" mentions adding a user "ais" to the system. Shouldn't the package be doing that? Would it be approriate to do a "/sbin/service openais condrestart" in %post to restart the service if it's running when the main package is upgraded? Directory ownership looks OK to me now. I think %{_libdir}/openais/lib*.so.* should be in the main package, and only %{_libdir}/openais/lib*.so should be in the devel package. This would be consistent with other packages. If the libs are only needed for the devel package, then the /etc/ld.so.conf.d/openais-*.conf file should be in the devel package and the scriptlet calls of ldconfig should be in the devel package too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 30 16:06:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 May 2006 12:06:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 183912] Review Request: jack-audio-connection-kit - The Jack Audio Connection Kit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605301606.k4UG6Kj0006850@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jack-audio-connection-kit - The Jack Audio Connection Kit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183912 ------- Additional Comments From green at redhat.com 2006-05-30 11:58 EST ------- I just yum installed jack-audio-connection-kit from extras-development. Congratulations and thank you! Are you planning on putting it in the FC-5 branch as well? Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 30 16:11:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 May 2006 12:11:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 175282] Review Request: apollon: Filesharing client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605301611.k4UGB55i007206@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: apollon: Filesharing client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175282 Bug 175282 depends on bug 170602, which changed state. Bug 170602 Summary: kdelibs: cleanup .la files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=170602 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |WONTFIX Status|NEW |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 30 16:20:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 May 2006 12:20:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190101] Review Request: php-pear-Log In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605301620.k4UGKgPn007721@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Log https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190101 ------- Additional Comments From Fedora at FamilleCollet.com 2006-05-30 12:13 EST ------- Spec URL: http://remi.collet.free.fr/rpms/extras/php-pear-Log.spec SRPM URL: http://remi.collet.free.fr/rpms/extras/php-pear-Log-1.9.6-1.fc5.src.rpm Mock build log : http://remi.collet.free.fr/rpms/extras/php-pear-Log-build.log - update to 1.9.6 - install Licence in prep -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 30 17:54:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 May 2006 13:54:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192413] libdhcp : IPv6 and IPv4 DHCP client and network configuration library API In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605301754.k4UHs2K5013501@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: libdhcp : IPv6 and IPv4 DHCP client and network configuration library API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192413 ------- Additional Comments From dcantrel at redhat.com 2006-05-30 13:46 EST ------- (In reply to comment #28) > RE: > > Looking at /usr/include/dhcp4client/isc-dhcp/dhcp4client.h and then the one > > for IPv6, I only see one function prototype and it looks like an entry point > > for execing the client daemon to me. > > Each libdhcp{4,6}client library provides only one entry point, which is the > client main() function renamed to dhcpv{4,6}_client . The main functions > have been modifed not to go into daemon mode, fork any processes etc., or > to create any files at all, if running under libdhcp, and also to clean up > after themselves - before returning, they free all memory used by the > client and reintialize all the global variables used by the client. > I've tested running both the clients 100 times in succession in the same > process under valgrind and valgrind reports no leaked files, memory or > memory access errors from client code. OK, then this is probably why I thought it was execing the client. It's not doing that, but rather it is the client code (minus some daemon housekeeping). I'm all for code reuse, but the libdhcp{4,6}client + libdhcp solution is simply too big for loader2. Loader2 is static and needs to fit in tight spaces. I also have questions about these new client libraries for DHCP. It's just duplicating the client code in the form of the library, right? Having two copies of large programs, one as a client and one as a library, opens the door to more maintenance issues...at least down the road. Are these libraries something you want to send upstream to ISC and then patch the clients to use them? This really has no bearing on its use in anaconda, but it's a concern I have. A drop-in replacement for pump now helps, but it pulls in libdhcp{4,6}client and libdhcp, which doesn't help loader2. Pump doesn't need to be a client, we just need the library. I think this is the way to go for loader2 in anaconda. We need a minimal IPv4 and IPv6 library that can link in to loader2. It only needs to be there for bringing up the network interface so we can grab stage2 and make it go. It's hard to define minimal, but there are certainly things in dhclient (and the one for IPv6) that just don't matter for the installer. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 30 18:30:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 May 2006 14:30:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192413] libdhcp : IPv6 and IPv4 DHCP client and network configuration library API In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605301830.k4UIUvu2016436@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: libdhcp : IPv6 and IPv4 DHCP client and network configuration library API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192413 ------- Additional Comments From jvdias at redhat.com 2006-05-30 14:23 EST ------- Please define "too big" - the libraries used by libdhcp are quite small: -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 761964 May 30 12:11 /usr/lib/libdhcp4client.a -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 253272 May 26 13:19 /usr/lib/libdhcp6client.a -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 118898 May 30 12:20 /usr/lib/libdhcp.a -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 345150 May 26 20:13 /usr/lib/libnl.a = a total size of 1479284 bytes. This is quite small compared to the libc.a already linked in to loader2: -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2667018 May 24 04:39 /usr/lib/libc.a How small does loader2 have to be ? Have you tried using libdhcp and found it to be too big ? What is the actual size limitation of loader2 ? The libdhcp* footprint would be MUCH smaller if libdhcp could simply execute the dhcp client binaries in separate processes, and use IPC to obtain the DHCP parameters, but I was told that this was not an option and that a library implementation was required. libdhcp could also be MUCH smaller if loader2 could use shared libs - why can't it ? RE: > there are certainly things in dhclient (and the one for IPv6) that just > don't matter for the installer. Which things ? Everything in dhclient and dhcpv6 is required, depending on configuration settings. RE: > Pump doesn't need to be a client, we just need the library How would you intend to obtain DHCP parameters from a DHCP server without implementing the DHCP client protocol ? RE: > We need a minimal IPv4 and IPv6 library that can link in to loader2. That is what libdhcp and libdhcp{4,6}client provide. Either we use the ISC dhclient and DHCPv6 code for anaconda, giving users a full featured and configurable DHCP client that they already know how to configure, and allowing us to re-use the code from the FC clients, or we write our own DHCPv4 and DHCPv6 clients for anaconda from scratch. I can undertake to write DHCP and DHCPv4 clients from scratch if desired, but it seems to me to be the wrong way to go when we already have tried and tested DHCP client code that users are familiar with and know how to configure. Please at least give libdhcp a try - if we come across any obstacles, I can resolve them. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 30 19:19:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 May 2006 15:19:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 183912] Review Request: jack-audio-connection-kit - The Jack Audio Connection Kit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605301919.k4UJJpRm021367@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jack-audio-connection-kit - The Jack Audio Connection Kit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183912 ------- Additional Comments From andy at smile.org.ua 2006-05-30 15:12 EST ------- Anthony, I've put request to wiki already. I'm wating to answer now. Please, keep track the events there. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 30 19:24:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 May 2006 15:24:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187243] Review Request: lazarus : IDE and RAD tool for the free pascal compiler (fpc) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605301924.k4UJOhsn021674@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lazarus : IDE and RAD tool for the free pascal compiler (fpc) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187243 ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2006-05-30 15:17 EST ------- (In reply to comment #11) > Upstream has released version 0.9.16. Should I update the package, or are some > people busy reviewing 0.9.14, who won't like to do their work over again? Please update. Reviewing the latest version is preferred. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 30 19:42:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 May 2006 15:42:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193584] New: Review Request: nucleo - Toolkit for exploring new uses of video Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193584 Summary: Review Request: nucleo - Toolkit for exploring new uses of video Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: chris.stone at gmail.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://tkmame.retrogames.com/fedora-extras/nucleo.spec SRPM URL: http://tkmame.retrogames.com/fedora-extras/nucleo-0.5-2.src.rpm Description: Nucleo is a toolkit for exploring new uses of video and new human-computer interaction techniques. This should obsolete bug #177081 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 30 19:43:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 May 2006 15:43:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177081] Review Request: nucleo In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605301943.k4UJhb7Z023442@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nucleo https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177081 ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2006-05-30 15:35 EST ------- new bugzilla entry created bug #193584 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 30 19:55:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 May 2006 15:55:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192603] Review Request: openalpp - Object Oriented version of OpenAL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605301955.k4UJtp12024338@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: openalpp - Object Oriented version of OpenAL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192603 ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2006-05-30 15:48 EST ------- Spec URL: http://tkmame.retrogames.com/fedora-extras/openalpp.spec SRPM URL: http://tkmame.retrogames.com/fedora-extras/openalpp-20060405-3.src.rpm %changelog * Tue May 30 2006 Christopher Stone 20060405-3 - Fix Group - Fix patch number The debian guys added that patch to the spec file, I'm not sure why they chose 3330, I've changed it back to just patch0. Group has also been fixed. Thanks for the review! I'm not sure if you noticed, but I did approve the xgalaga package a week ago. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 30 20:11:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 May 2006 16:11:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191667] Review Request: poker-engine - Python library that implements poker rules In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605302011.k4UKBUtH025037@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: poker-engine - Python library that implements poker rules https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191667 ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2006-05-30 16:03 EST ------- Spec URL: http://tkmame.retrogames.com/fedora-extras/poker-engine.spec SRPM URL: http://tkmame.retrogames.com/fedora-extras/poker-engine-1.0.15-1.src.rpm %changelog * Tue May 30 2006 Christopher Stone - 1.0.15-1 - Upstream sync - Add rsync to Requires - Remove patches and autoreconf since these have been fixed in new release I've updated this to the 1.0.15 release which no longer requires the patches to be installed and no longer requires the autoreconf. I also added rsync to the Requires. Thanks for the review! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 30 20:13:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 May 2006 16:13:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191667] Review Request: poker-engine - Python library that implements poker rules In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605302013.k4UKDAUD025154@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: poker-engine - Python library that implements poker rules https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191667 ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2006-05-30 16:05 EST ------- Oh, and the xml files in /usr/share are supposed to be "reference" files while the ones in /etc are editable. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 30 20:30:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 May 2006 16:30:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191545] Review Request: perl-Net-Jabber In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605302030.k4UKUO6g026402@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-Jabber https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191545 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-05-30 16:22 EST ------- Updated. Also included perl(Time::Timezone) as a requires, as its presence enables additional functionality in Net::Jabber, and the autoreq scripts don't pick it up. Spec URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-Net-Jabber.spec SRPM URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-Net-Jabber-2.0-5.fc5.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 30 20:36:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 May 2006 16:36:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192060] Review Request: blobwars - Mission and Objective based 2D Platform Game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605302036.k4UKaSxh027253@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: blobwars - Mission and Objective based 2D Platform Game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192060 fedora at soeterbroek.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora at soeterbroek.com ------- Additional Comments From fedora at soeterbroek.com 2006-05-30 16:28 EST ------- Review for release 1: * RPM name is OK * Source blobwars_1.05.orig.tar.gz is the same as upstream * Builds fine in mock * rpmlint looks OK * File list looks OK * Works fine, including sound -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 30 21:31:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 May 2006 17:31:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189892] Review Request: dssi - Disposable Soft Synth Interface In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605302131.k4ULVhak031436@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dssi - Disposable Soft Synth Interface https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189892 ------- Additional Comments From green at redhat.com 2006-05-30 17:24 EST ------- Fixed jack-dssi-host for x86-64 hosts... Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/green/FE/FC5/dssi.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/green/FE/FC5/dssi-0.9.1-5.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 30 21:47:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 May 2006 17:47:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192540] Review Request: cal3d - A skeletal based 3-D character animation library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605302147.k4ULlmMY032710@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cal3d - A skeletal based 3-D character animation library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192540 ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2006-05-30 17:39 EST ------- Thanks for the review. Upstream is hinting at version 0.11.0 being released next week, so I will wait until that is out before updating the spec. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 30 21:57:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 May 2006 17:57:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193478] Review Request: wordpress - database driven blogging software In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605302157.k4ULvKM3000632@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wordpress - database driven blogging software https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193478 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2006-05-30 17:49 EST ------- Direct static code injection vulnerability in WordPress 2.0.2 and earlier: http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2006-2667 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 30 22:28:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 May 2006 18:28:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192060] Review Request: blobwars - Mission and Objective based 2D Platform Game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605302228.k4UMSZuc001733@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: blobwars - Mission and Objective based 2D Platform Game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192060 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |chris.stone at gmail.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 30 22:54:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 May 2006 18:54:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193584] Review Request: nucleo - Toolkit for exploring new uses of video In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605302254.k4UMsAc0003305@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nucleo - Toolkit for exploring new uses of video https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193584 luya_tfz at thefinalzone.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |luya_tfz at thefinalzone.com BugsThisDependsOn| |177081 OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 30 22:54:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 May 2006 18:54:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177081] Review Request: nucleo In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605302254.k4UMshGL003375@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nucleo https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177081 luya_tfz at thefinalzone.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |193584 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 30 22:59:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 May 2006 18:59:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193584] Review Request: nucleo - Toolkit for exploring new uses of video In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605302259.k4UMxPAq003484@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nucleo - Toolkit for exploring new uses of video https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193584 luya_tfz at thefinalzone.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From luya_tfz at thefinalzone.com 2006-05-30 18:51 EST ------- - Spec files followed the Packaging Guideline http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines and the Package Naming Guideline http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines - sha1sum and md5sum from SRPM match the source package from the original website : http://insitu.lri.fr/~chapuis/software/metisse/ - The built package passed the rpmlint check - The license from the package is LGPL - In accordance, the spec and srpms passed the review and should be added in the cvs extras -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 30 23:04:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 May 2006 19:04:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177081] Review Request: nucleo In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605302304.k4UN4mAW003669@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nucleo https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177081 luya_tfz at thefinalzone.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO_REPORTER |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE ------- Additional Comments From luya_tfz at thefinalzone.com 2006-05-30 18:56 EST ------- Bug closed. Obsoloted by #193584 *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 193584 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 30 23:04:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 May 2006 19:04:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193584] Review Request: nucleo - Toolkit for exploring new uses of video In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605302304.k4UN4xPf003690@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nucleo - Toolkit for exploring new uses of video https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193584 luya_tfz at thefinalzone.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedorajim at gmail.com Bug 193584 depends on bug 177081, which changed state. Bug 177081 Summary: Review Request: nucleo https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177081 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |DUPLICATE Status|NEEDINFO_REPORTER |CLOSED ------- Additional Comments From luya_tfz at thefinalzone.com 2006-05-30 18:57 EST ------- *** Bug 177081 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 30 23:05:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 May 2006 19:05:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177080] Review Request: metisse In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605302305.k4UN5NPq003728@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: metisse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177080 Bug 177080 depends on bug 177081, which changed state. Bug 177081 Summary: Review Request: nucleo https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177081 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |DUPLICATE Status|NEEDINFO_REPORTER |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 30 23:21:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 May 2006 19:21:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189884] Review Request: LASH Audio Session Handler In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605302321.k4UNL1R4004187@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: LASH Audio Session Handler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189884 ------- Additional Comments From green at redhat.com 2006-05-30 19:13 EST ------- I believe all this is fixed, and more. Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/green/FE/FC5/lash.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/green/FE/FC5/lash-0.5.1-2.src.rpm Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 30 23:21:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 May 2006 19:21:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191667] Review Request: poker-engine - Python library that implements poker rules In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605302321.k4UNLaMT004208@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: poker-engine - Python library that implements poker rules https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191667 wart at kobold.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2006-05-30 19:13 EST ------- * Source still matches upstream. new md5sum: 5b51616881d0ee10354b0f5f573a52d1 poker-engine-1.0.15.tar.gz * rpmlint output unchanged from before * Still builds in mock on FC4, FC5 (devel not retested) APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 30 23:31:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 May 2006 19:31:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192060] Review Request: blobwars - Mission and Objective based 2D Platform Game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605302331.k4UNVUSR004438@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: blobwars - Mission and Objective based 2D Platform Game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192060 ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2006-05-30 19:23 EST ------- * rpmlint output clean * Package named according to Package Naming Guidelines * spec file name matches package %{name} * Package meets Packaging Guidelines * Licensed with open source compatible license * License field in spec file matches actual license * License text included in %doc * spec file written in American English * spec file is legible * Sources match upstream 72b259abb6ec83a77f3c76052de24e50 blobwars_1.05.orig.tar.gz * Package successfully compiles and builds on x86_64 FC-5 * All dependencies are specified in BuildRequires - SDL-devel and ImageMagick are extraneous BR * Spec file does not include any locales * Package does not include any shared libraries * Package is not relocatable * Package owns all directories it creates * Package does not contain duplicate files in %files * File permissions are set appropriately * Package contains a proper %clean section * Macro usage is consistant * Package contains permissible content * Package does not contain large documentation to warrent a -doc subpackage * Package does not contain any header files, static libraries or .pc files * Package does not include any library files needed for a -devel subpackage * Package does not contain any .la files * Package includes a proper .desktop file * Package does not own any files or directories owned by other packages === MUST FIX ==== * MUST remove extreanous BR SDL-devel and ImageMagick * MUST remove extreanous "export" in %build section * MUST remove extreanous "-n %{name}-%{version}" under %setup === SHOULD === * Please explain to me why you use patch -z, most examples I've seen use patch -b and I don't understand the differences between these two options. I'm not asking you to use -b, but just explain to me why you use -z. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 30 23:54:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 May 2006 19:54:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192060] Review Request: blobwars - Mission and Objective based 2D Platform Game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605302354.k4UNs6BW005677@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: blobwars - Mission and Objective based 2D Platform Game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192060 ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2006-05-30 19:46 EST ------- Additional comment (SHOULD FIX): /var/tmp/blobwars-1.05-1-root-mockbuild/usr/share/applications/fedora-blobwars.desktop: warning: boolean key "Terminal" has value "0", boolean values should be "false" or "true", although "0" and "1" are allowed in this field for backwards compatibility -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 30 23:56:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 May 2006 19:56:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192060] Review Request: blobwars - Mission and Objective based 2D Platform Game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605302356.k4UNuE8G005772@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: blobwars - Mission and Objective based 2D Platform Game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192060 ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2006-05-30 19:48 EST ------- NOTE SHOULD FIX: If you are planning on fixing the .desktop file, I will also recommend you call the game "Blob Wars: Metal Blob Solid" instead of just "Metal Blob Solid". This will make it easier to locate and will be easier when Part II is released. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 31 00:43:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 May 2006 20:43:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193478] Review Request: wordpress - database driven blogging software In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605310043.k4V0hA3f007110@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wordpress - database driven blogging software https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193478 ------- Additional Comments From jwb at redhat.com 2006-05-30 20:35 EST ------- Well, there doesn't appear to be a patch available, so this review will have to wait until there is one. I'm watching the svn and testers lists upstream. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 31 05:43:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 01:43:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192432] Review Request: compiz In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605310543.k4V5hnhZ020357@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compiz https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192432 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at leemhuis.info 2006-05-31 01:36 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > For building compiz, the control-center-devel package with 2.14.0 is requiered. > Pre made package are avalable [...] This is going to be a problem -- control-center is already in Core and Extras packages are not allowed to replace packages from Core. The proper way to solve this kind of problem in Fedora-Land would be to convince the core maintainer to release a update that also builds the devel package. That's probably not that easy, but you should at least try (e.g. create a patch for the control-center.spec from Core, open a bug here, describe the situation and attach the patch to the bug). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 31 07:15:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 03:15:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192603] Review Request: openalpp - Object Oriented version of OpenAL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605310715.k4V7Ful3024378@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: openalpp - Object Oriented version of OpenAL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192603 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-05-31 03:08 EST ------- All problems fixed -> approved! > I'm not sure if you noticed, but I did approve the xgalaga package a week ago. No I didn't notice, this must have fallen through the cracks, thanks for the headsup. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 31 07:20:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 03:20:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193632] New: Review Request: tkdnd Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193632 Summary: Review Request: tkdnd Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: sander at hoentjen.eu QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://amsn.hoentjen.eu/download/tkdnd.spec SRPM URL: http://amsn.hoentjen.eu/download/tkdnd-1.0a2-1.src.rpm Description: Tk extension that adds native drag & drop capabilities I currently have an rpmlint error: W: tkdnd unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib/tkdnd/libtkdnd.so How can I fix this? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 31 07:20:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 03:20:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192603] Review Request: openalpp - Object Oriented version of OpenAL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605310720.k4V7KkxK024611@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: openalpp - Object Oriented version of OpenAL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192603 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 31 09:31:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 05:31:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193632] Review Request: tkdnd In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605310931.k4V9VwwV002662@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tkdnd https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193632 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-05-31 05:24 EST ------- (In reply to comment #0) > Spec URL: http://amsn.hoentjen.eu/download/tkdnd.spec > SRPM URL: http://amsn.hoentjen.eu/download/tkdnd-1.0a2-1.src.rpm > Description: Tk extension that adds native drag & drop capabilities > > I currently have an rpmlint error: > W: tkdnd unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib/tkdnd/libtkdnd.so The problem is caused by the .so file being installed without executable permissions. > How can I fix this? Use: make install INSTALL_DATA="install -p" instead of just: make install which uses a default for INSTALL_DATA of "/usr/bin/install -c -m 644" BuildReq tcl-devel isn't needed here because tk-devel depends on it by the way. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 31 11:07:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 07:07:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193632] Review Request: tkdnd In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605311107.k4VB7Y24007302@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tkdnd https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193632 ------- Additional Comments From sander at hoentjen.eu 2006-05-31 06:59 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > > How can I fix this? > > Use: > make install INSTALL_DATA="install -p" > instead of just: > make install > which uses a default for INSTALL_DATA of "/usr/bin/install -c -m 644" > thanks, fixed > BuildReq tcl-devel isn't needed here because tk-devel depends on it by the way. > fixed, thanks for your quick comments Spec URL: http://amsn.hoentjen.eu/download/tkdnd.spec SRPM URL: http://amsn.hoentjen.eu/download/tkdnd-1.0a2-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 31 12:25:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 08:25:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193224] Review Request: streamer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605311225.k4VCPKab010863@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: streamer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193224 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-05-31 08:17 EST ------- paul, I solved all problems now by reversioning all my Source as well as SPEC Changes. I have placed all my SRPMS right from the first i posted to review to latest one. Latest SPEC URL: http://people.redhat.com/pnemade/Qcwebcam/streamer.spec First Version(1.1.1-1) posted for review is at=> SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/pnemade/Qcwebcam/streamer-1.1.1-1.fc5.src.rpm Then I added Following Changes to next version(1.1.2-1) - Solved Package dependency problem by adding BuildRequires in SPEC file. - Added GPL ChangeLog README in SPEC file and added GPL in tarball. - Remove Provides header - Wrap Description at 80 columns - Remove stripping binaries by removing -s from install SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/pnemade/Qcwebcam/streamer-1.1.2-1.fc5.src.rpm Then in Next version(1.1.3-1) I added - Added dir macro to avoid file inclusion twice - Change some code to remove warnings coming at compilation SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/pnemade/Qcwebcam/streamer-1.1.3-1.fc5.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 31 12:27:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 08:27:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 171915] Review Request: texmaker - LaTeX editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605311227.k4VCRjeJ011035@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: texmaker - LaTeX editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=171915 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From bugs.michael at gmx.net 2006-05-31 08:19 EST ------- Why did you make it "noarch" after the review process and ignoring that this package is C++ code which is compiled against Qt4? You now have released a PPC binary for i386: $ file texmaker texmaker: ELF 32-bit MSB executable, PowerPC or cisco 4500, version 1 (SYSV), for GNU/Linux 2.6.9, dynamically linked (uses shared libs), for GNU/Linux 2.6.9, stripped $ ldd texmaker linux-gate.so.1 => (0x0073e000) libqt-mt.so.3 => /usr/lib/qt-3.3/lib/libqt-mt.so.3 (0x0551b000) libXext.so.6 => /usr/lib/libXext.so.6 (0x009f5000) libX11.so.6 => /usr/lib/libX11.so.6 (0x008f1000) libstdc++.so.6 => /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6 (0x0042c000) libm.so.6 => /lib/libm.so.6 (0x00891000) libgcc_s.so.1 => /lib/libgcc_s.so.1 (0x00db6000) libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0x0075c000) libmng.so.1 => /usr/lib/libmng.so.1 (0x033fa000) libjpeg.so.62 => /usr/lib/libjpeg.so.62 (0x0302c000) libpng12.so.0 => /usr/lib/libpng12.so.0 (0x00b6f000) libz.so.1 => /usr/lib/libz.so.1 (0x008be000) libXrender.so.1 => /usr/lib/libXrender.so.1 (0x00b99000) libXrandr.so.2 => /usr/lib/libXrandr.so.2 (0x00bee000) libXcursor.so.1 => /usr/lib/libXcursor.so.1 (0x00bfb000) libXinerama.so.1 => /usr/lib/libXinerama.so.1 (0x00be9000) libXft.so.2 => /usr/lib/libXft.so.2 (0x0352e000) libfreetype.so.6 => /usr/lib/libfreetype.so.6 (0x00abe000) libfontconfig.so.1 => /usr/lib/libfontconfig.so.1 (0x00baa000) libSM.so.6 => /usr/lib/libSM.so.6 (0x00dc4000) libICE.so.6 => /usr/lib/libICE.so.6 (0x00dcf000) libdl.so.2 => /lib/libdl.so.2 (0x008b8000) libpthread.so.0 => /lib/libpthread.so.0 (0x008db000) libXau.so.6 => /usr/lib/libXau.so.6 (0x009f0000) libXdmcp.so.6 => /usr/lib/libXdmcp.so.6 (0x008d3000) /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x0073f000) liblcms.so.1 => /usr/lib/liblcms.so.1 (0x031c6000) libXfixes.so.3 => /usr/lib/libXfixes.so.3 (0x00bf4000) libexpat.so.0 => /lib/libexpat.so.0 (0x00a9b000) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 31 12:32:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 08:32:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 183067] Review Request: par2 - PAR2 recovery set command line utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605311232.k4VCWcUi011239@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: par2 - PAR2 recovery set command line utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183067 laurent.rineau__fedora_extras at normalesup.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE ------- Additional Comments From laurent.rineau__fedora_extras at normalesup.org 2006-05-31 08:25 EST ------- No anwser. I got fedorabugs membership since then. I close this bug. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 190070 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 31 12:33:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 08:33:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190070] Review Request: par2cmdline In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605311233.k4VCX1Ax011271@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: par2cmdline https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190070 laurent.rineau__fedora_extras at normalesup.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |a.kurtz at hardsun.net ------- Additional Comments From laurent.rineau__fedora_extras at normalesup.org 2006-05-31 08:25 EST ------- *** Bug 183067 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 31 12:55:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 08:55:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 183067] Review Request: par2 - PAR2 recovery set command line utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605311255.k4VCtnhQ012649@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: par2 - PAR2 recovery set command line utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183067 bugs.michael at gmx.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 31 13:34:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 09:34:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193478] Review Request: wordpress - database driven blogging software In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605311334.k4VDYYQL014465@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wordpress - database driven blogging software https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193478 ------- Additional Comments From jwb at redhat.com 2006-05-31 09:26 EST ------- I'll have to correct myself - it appears this was patched on 5-26 in SVN. I've added that patch, rebuilt, and tested the given exploit, and the exploit now fails. Spec: http://www.berningeronline.net/wordpress.spec SRPM: http://www.berningeronline.net/wordpress-2.0.2-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 31 13:49:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 09:49:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193224] Review Request: streamer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605311349.k4VDnT0q015891@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: streamer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193224 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-05-31 09:41 EST ------- paul, How can this package will come to Fedora-Extras as i cannot see any new Review Request bugzilla ID that you said me to check it? Does that mean i need to wait until i review any package?? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 31 13:59:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 09:59:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193224] Review Request: streamer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605311359.k4VDx77P016351@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: streamer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193224 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-05-31 09:51 EST ------- paul, sorry i was searching at wrong place. Got new requests for Review Package. So i can directly interfere Review Request for others even if Bugzilla is going to assing it to somebody?? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 31 14:06:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 10:06:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193224] Review Request: streamer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605311406.k4VE6vsE016831@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: streamer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193224 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-05-31 09:59 EST ------- (In reply to comment #13) > sorry i was searching at wrong place. Got new requests for Review Package. So > i can directly interfere Review Request for others even if Bugzilla is going to > assing it to somebody?? Yes, just add your comments as you would in a normal bug report, without changing any of the assignment/status etc. fields. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 31 14:31:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 10:31:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193632] Review Request: tkdnd In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605311431.k4VEVi2F017987@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tkdnd https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193632 wart at kobold.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |wart at kobold.org ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2006-05-31 10:23 EST ------- Doesn't build on x86_64. It looks like this will need the same tcl.m4 fix that was used for tcltls (adding $libdir to the path where tclConfig.sh is found) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 31 16:32:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 12:32:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193679] New: Review Request: control-center-devel Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193679 Summary: Review Request: control-center-devel Product: Fedora Core Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: notting at redhat.com ReportedBy: alcapcom at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Compiz (id 192432) wait for review on Extras package, require a devel package for control-center. one said to me that is not an easy thing, but I hope that this request is accepted. A patch to do that is attached to this bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 31 16:35:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 12:35:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193679] Review Request: control-center-devel In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605311635.k4VGZcVZ028091@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: control-center-devel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193679 ------- Additional Comments From alcapcom at gmail.com 2006-05-31 12:27 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=130294) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=130294&action=view) control-center.spec file patch -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 31 16:38:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 12:38:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192432] Review Request: compiz In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605311638.k4VGckve028406@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compiz https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192432 ------- Additional Comments From alcapcom at gmail.com 2006-05-31 12:30 EST ------- done! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 31 17:07:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 13:07:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193679] Review Request: control-center-devel In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605311707.k4VH74sT030570@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: control-center-devel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193679 notting at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|Package Review |control-center AssignedTo|notting at redhat.com |rstrode at redhat.com QAContact|extras-qa at fedoraproject.org |dkl at redhat.com CC| |wtogami at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From notting at redhat.com 2006-05-31 12:59 EST ------- Assigning to the actual package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 31 17:14:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 13:14:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193679] Review Request: control-center-devel In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605311714.k4VHECmw031055@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: control-center-devel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193679 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO_REPORTER ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2006-05-31 13:06 EST ------- Do you really need the .a and .la files? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 31 17:41:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 13:41:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193584] Review Request: nucleo - Toolkit for exploring new uses of video In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605311741.k4VHflYY032539@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nucleo - Toolkit for exploring new uses of video https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193584 ville.skytta at iki.fi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177080 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 31 17:42:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 13:42:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177080] Review Request: metisse In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605311742.k4VHg08u032604@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: metisse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177080 ville.skytta at iki.fi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |193584 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 31 17:42:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 13:42:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177081] Review Request: nucleo In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605311742.k4VHgJ9k032689@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nucleo https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177081 ville.skytta at iki.fi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778, 177080, 193584 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 31 17:42:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 13:42:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177080] Review Request: metisse In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605311742.k4VHggxS032746@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: metisse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177080 ville.skytta at iki.fi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn|177081 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 31 17:43:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 13:43:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193584] Review Request: nucleo - Toolkit for exploring new uses of video In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605311743.k4VHh58g000349@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nucleo - Toolkit for exploring new uses of video https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193584 ville.skytta at iki.fi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn|177081 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 31 18:34:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 14:34:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192876] Review Request: V2Strip ID3v2(Mp3 Files) tags remover In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605311834.k4VIYVmu004838@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: V2Strip ID3v2(Mp3 Files) tags remover https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192876 hugo at devin.com.br changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |hugo at devin.com.br ------- Additional Comments From hugo at devin.com.br 2006-05-31 14:26 EST ------- Review for this package: BLOCKERS: - Package in non-standard group (Applications/Shell), see: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/RPMGroups - The application don't need the 'openssl-devel' BuildRequires. (Why?) - You must include the COPYING file in %doc's %files. It contains the license of the application (GPL). - ChangeLog should be in %doc too. SHOULD: - When creating a new specfile, the recommended way is to create using the following command: fedora-newrpmspec - (Really minor) The arrangement in the specfile could be better. Spacing and these things. The 'fedora-newrpmspec' helps on this. You can look at other specs too. Just to get the specfile more organized and pretty :-) - (Really minor) Description is ok. Consider putting "v2strip is a ..." before the description field. Example: "v2strip is a little utility that removes ID3v2..." OKS: - Source package matches the package from upstream - Builds and works fine - Package name ok -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 31 18:36:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 14:36:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187430] Review Request: elektra In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605311836.k4VIasXi005251@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: elektra https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187430 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-05-31 14:29 EST ------- As it ships a .pc file, the elektra-devel package should Requires: pkgconfig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 31 18:47:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 14:47:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189713] Review Request: gnubg In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605311847.k4VIlj13006675@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnubg https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189713 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at soeterbroek.com 2006-05-31 14:40 EST ------- * Wed May 31 2006 - Joost Soeterbroek - added find_lang macro - added full URL to Source - added BuildReqs. - added correct Reqs. to sub-packages - added defattr to sub-packages' files section - added correct TexInfo scriptlet for post and preun Spec URL: http://www.soeterbroek.com/linux/fedora/extras/gnubg/gnubg.spec SRPM URL: http://www.soeterbroek.com/linux/fedora/extras/gnubg/gnubg-20060530-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 31 19:30:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 15:30:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193712] New: Review Request: sos Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193712 Summary: Review Request: sos Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info ReportedBy: sconklin at redhat.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/sconklin/sos.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/sconklin/sos-0.1-5.src.rpm Description: Sos is a set of tools that gathers information about system hardware and configuration. The information can then be used for diagnostic purposes and debugging. Sos is commonly used to help support technicians and developers. Sos implements a pluggable architecture that allows package maintainers to deliver plugins that will collect information that's useful to them in debugging and maintaining their packages. This is my first package and I need a sponsor -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 31 19:32:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 15:32:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193712] Review Request: sos In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605311932.k4VJWm3u010078@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sos https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193712 sconklin at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 31 19:41:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 15:41:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190390] Review Request: AGReader - Console reader for viewing AmigaGuide files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605311941.k4VJfNt0010813@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: AGReader - Console reader for viewing AmigaGuide files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190390 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-05-31 15:33 EST ------- Don't forget to close this with a resolution of next release once AGReader has been built successfully -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 31 19:41:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 15:41:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193312] Review Request: DevIL - A cross-platform image library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605311941.k4VJfrEq010917@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: DevIL - A cross-platform image library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193312 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-05-31 15:34 EST ------- Don't forget to close this with a resolution of next release once this has been built successfully -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 31 21:01:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 17:01:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193478] Review Request: wordpress - database driven blogging software In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605312101.k4VL1ZLq015834@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wordpress - database driven blogging software https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193478 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2006-05-31 16:53 EST ------- Happened to notice another one today, IP spoofing issue: http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2006-2702 (Note: just parroting my findings here, I have no experience with wordpress nor am I planning to review it, and I've only _very_ quickly peeked into the SRPM, so sorry in advance if this turns out to be noise.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 31 21:27:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 17:27:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 169703] Review Request: pari - Number Theory-oriented Computer Algebra System In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605312127.k4VLRKtW018017@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pari - Number Theory-oriented Computer Algebra System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=169703 gemi at bluewin.ch changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From gemi at bluewin.ch 2006-05-31 17:19 EST ------- I have opened a new bug #193727 for the failed-test problem on ppc. Orion, it would be nice if could try a little to find out what the problem is. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 31 22:22:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 18:22:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 178900] Review Request: monodoc In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605312222.k4VMMROu020669@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: monodoc https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=178900 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-05-31 18:14 EST ------- Spec Name or Url: http://www.smmp.salford.ac.uk/packages/monodoc.spec Changes 1.1.13-8 Removed postun Fixed the devel package bit Added %description devel to the spec file -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 31 23:09:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 19:09:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193632] Review Request: tkdnd In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605312309.k4VN9WPK022606@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tkdnd https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193632 ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2006-05-31 19:01 EST ------- The --libdir argument to configure is necessary due to a poorly written mkIndex.tcl script. In addition, upstream seems to have decided to include a prebuilt dll file in the source tarball. Naughty upstream! If you remove the lib/tkdnd/*.dll in %prep and use the sed script below in %build, then you don't need to pass --libdir in %configure. This addresses the problem directly instead of indirectly through --libdir. %{__sed} -i -e 's#libtkdnd.dll ##' \ -e "s#^set libdir.*#set libdir $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_libdir}#" \ mkIndex.tcl.in You should also pass DESTDIR to make install: make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT INSTALL_DATA="install -p" -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 31 23:42:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 19:42:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 182254] Review Request: SS5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605312342.k4VNg2hm023595@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: SS5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=182254 jpmahowald at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2006-05-31 19:34 EST ------- Using ss5-3.5.9-1.src.rpm - rpmlint checks return: E: ss5 configure-without-libdir-spec A configure script is run without specifying the libdir. configure options must be augmented with something like --libdir=%{_libdir}. Built fine, however, with the --with-libpath option. I say ignore. W: ss5 no-version-in-last-changelog The last changelog entry doesn't contain a version. Please insert the version that is coherent with the version of the package and rebuild it. Next release add the version-release to the changelog, right after your email W: ss5 log-files-without-logrotate /var/log/ss5 This package contains files in /var/log/ without adding logrotate configuration for them. logrotate not critical, but may want to consider adding in the future. - package meets naming guidelines - package meets packaging guidelines - license (GPL) OK, text in %doc, matches source - spec file legible, in am. english - source matches upstream - package compiles on devel (x86_64) - no missing BR - no unnecessary BR - no locales - not relocatable - owns all directories that it creates - no duplicate files - permissions ok - %clean ok - macro use consistent - code, not content - no need for -docs - nothing in %doc affects runtime - no need for .desktop file APPROVED Do you need a sponsor? I'll be yours if necessary, apply for cvsextras. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 31 23:49:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 19:49:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 178900] Review Request: monodoc In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200605312349.k4VNnR8I024045@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: monodoc https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=178900 ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at ameritech.net 2006-05-31 19:41 EST ------- NEEDS WORK. 1. Somewhere between monodoc-1.1.13-4.src.rpm & monodoc-1.1.13-8.src.rpm, in the %files sections you changed '%{_bindir}/*' to '%{_bindir}/'. This will give you the following error when running rpmlint: E: monodoc standard-dir-owned-by-package /usr/bin Which is a big no-no. 2. The debuginfo package is empty. You need to define '%define debug_package %{nil}' in the spec to disable it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.