[Bug 189197] Review Request: ghc-gtk2hs

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: ghc-gtk2hs


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189197





------- Additional Comments From gemi at bluewin.ch  2006-05-01 17:26 EST -------
(In reply to comment #7)
> But ghc642-gtk requires ghc642, so what happens when one upgrades to ghc643?
> I don't think it will be possible to rebuild all ghc built libs immediately
> after a new ghc release typically.
I see the problem... There is probably no better way out in the current
state of affairs. However I just wanted to have written down for the
posterity that I do consider it unsatisfactory :-)

The package builds fine in mock.
Installing the packages works and the demo programs build perfectly
well.
I find it a little annoying that the doc directories are:
ghc642-gtk-0.9.10
ghc-gtk2hs-doc-0.9.10
More consistent would be:
ghc-gtk2hs-0.9.10
ghc-gtk2hs-doc-0.9.10
This would mean, that the doc files would go in the ghc-gtk2hs-0.9.10
package which is currently. Is is possible however to install the
subpackages without the main package. Probably one could make
the package ghc642-gtk require ghc-gtk2hs, so that ghc-gtk2hs is always
installed.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.