[Bug 190071] Review Request: dvipost - latex post filter command
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Sat May 6 06:41:38 UTC 2006
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: dvipost - latex post filter command
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190071
jamatos at fc.up.pt changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED
Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE
------- Additional Comments From jamatos at fc.up.pt 2006-05-06 02:41 EST -------
(In reply to comment #15)
> Some comments:
>
> * %post -p /usr/bin/texhash
>
> will automatically add
> Requires(post) /usr/bin/texhash
Right.
> So I think the explicit dependency on tetex-fonts is not really right
> as it may change in the future.
OK.
> * A dependence on kpsewhich should be there, however, in my opinion:
> BuildRequires: /usr/bin/kpsewhich
Done.
> * In my opinion the following should be used to detect %_texmf, since
> in configure kpsewhich is also used (even though a bit differently
> but I believe the result is the same)
> %{!?_texmf: %define _texmf %(eval "echo
`kpsewhich -expand-var '$TEXMFMAIN'`")}
I agree, we should probably harmonize this in rules for tetex derived
packages. Reading other tetex-* packages both ways are used.
> * the tetex package is picked up by tetex-latex, so I think that
> the dependencies on tetex should be removed.
I knew that. :-)
I removed it.
The changes have been commited to CVS but I don't think the changes require
a new build.
The package build cleanly for all branches so I will close this bug.
The package build cleanly, so
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
More information about the Fedora-package-review
mailing list