[Bug 188176] Review Request: gauche-gtk - Gauche extension module to use GTK

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Sat May 6 19:11:20 UTC 2006


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: gauche-gtk - Gauche extension module to use GTK


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188176


tibbs at math.uh.edu changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
OtherBugsDependingO|163778                      |163779
              nThis|                            |




------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu  2006-05-06 15:11 EST -------
OK, now we're getting somewhere.  Rawhide still looks broken to me, but builds
in FC5, i386 and x86_64 succeed and I ran through the examples on x86_64 with no
problems.  rpmlint has a couple of complaints:

W: gauche-gtk hidden-file-or-dir /usr/share/gauche/0.8.7/lib/.packages
W: gauche-gtk hidden-file-or-dir /usr/share/gauche/0.8.7/lib/.packages
W: gauche-gtk doc-file-dependency
/usr/share/doc/gauche-gtk-0.4.1/examples/glgd/run /bin/sh

The problem with the first warning is that it will set off various rootkit
detection programs and is generally a bad idea, but I'm not sure if it would be
feasible to change where gauche looks for its packages.  I'm inclined to say
this isn't a blocker, but if it's not difficult to make gauche look in
"packages" instead of ".packages" then I think it would be best if you could do so.

The second is simply that the doc file is executable, which is generally
considered a bad idea although in this case the dependency doesn't cause
problems.  I would suggest that you just chmod -x examples/glgd/run.

Review:
* package meets naming and packaging guidelines.
* specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently.
* license field matches the actual license.
* license is open source-compatible; text is included in the package.
* source files match upstream:
   18356efab446b9524be8371a3b852a6a  Gauche-gtk-0.4.1.tgz
   18356efab446b9524be8371a3b852a6a  Gauche-gtk-0.4.1.tgz-srpm
* latest version is being packaged.
* BuildRequires are proper.
* package builds in mock (FC5, i386 and x86_64).
O rpmlint has excusable errors.
* final provides and requires are sane.
O shared libraries are present, but they are internal to Gauche and so ldconfig
doesn't need to be called.
* package is not relocatable.
* owns the directories it creates.
* doesn't own any directories it shouldn't.
* no duplicates in %files.
O file permissions are appropriate, exceot for an executable docfile.
* %clean is present.
O %check is not present; no test suite upstream.
* no scriptlets present.
* code, not content.
* documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary.
* %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package.
* no headers.
* no pkgconfig files.
* no libtool .la droppings.

APPROVED, but please consider the two issues above before checking in.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list