[Bug 189197] Review Request: ghc-gtk2hs

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: ghc-gtk2hs


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189197





------- Additional Comments From gemi at bluewin.ch  2006-05-06 19:05 EST -------
(In reply to comment #9)
> My only concern now with the current package naming (ghc-gtk2hs) is: what happens
> if/when one day we want to build/package gtk2hs with another Haskell compiler or
> interpreter (say nhc98, jhc or hugs)?  In that sense using a more generic
> name for the source package (eg just gtk2hs) might be better after all?
> (We can still have a ghc-gtk2hs subpackage of course even in this case.)
Yes, that would make sense for the source package. I suppose it is not
required to have an main RPM matching the name of the SRPM.
I thought, maybe better not split the packages into separate packages for gconf,
etc... The largest package is gtk anyway.
We would have:
ghc-gtk2hs
ghc642-gtk2hs
nhc98-gtk2hs
nhc98-118-gtk2hs
etc...
This would be much simpler.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.