[Bug 185370] Review Request: gtklp - A GTK frontend to CUPS

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Sun May 7 15:46:59 UTC 2006


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: gtklp - A GTK frontend to CUPS


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=185370


jpmahowald at gmail.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
         AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |jpmahowald at gmail.com
OtherBugsDependingO|163776                      |163779
              nThis|                            |




------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com  2006-05-07 11:46 EST -------
- rpmlint checks return:
W: gtklp incoherent-version-in-changelog 1.2.1-1 1.2.1-2
Minor, release just doesn't match
E: gtklp incorrect-locale-subdir /usr/share/locale/chs/LC_MESSAGES/gtklp.mo
E: gtklp incorrect-locale-cs /usr/share/locale/cz/LC_MESSAGES/gtklp.mo
E: gtklp incorrect-locale-subdir /usr/share/locale/cht/LC_MESSAGES/gtklp.mo

- package meets naming guidelines
- package meets packaging guidelines
- license (GPL) OK, text in %doc, matches source
- spec file legible, in am. english
- source matches upstream
- package compiles on FC5 (x86_64)
- no missing BR
- no unnecessary BR
- locales handled properly
- not relocatable
- owns all directories that it creates
- no duplicate files
- permissions ok
- %clean ok
- macro use consistent
- code, not content
- no need for -docs
- nothing in %doc affects runtime
- .desktop files

It'd be a good idea to inform the author when this goes through so they can add
it to their distribution list.

APPROVED

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list