[Bug 190582] Review Request: perl-Module-ScanDeps - Recursively scan Perl code for dependencies

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Sun May 7 20:28:26 UTC 2006


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: perl-Module-ScanDeps - Recursively scan Perl code for dependencies


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190582


tibbs at math.uh.edu changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
OtherBugsDependingO|163778                      |163779
              nThis|                            |




------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu  2006-05-07 16:28 EST -------
The source URL seems wrong (or at least I can't fetch the upstream source from
there).  I could get it from:
http://search.cpan.org/CPAN/authors/id/S/SM/SMUELLER/Module-ScanDeps-0.59.tar.gz
which I'll assume is the correct upstream.

The module puts an executable with a .pl extension into bindir.  I agree with
Steve that this is a bit ugly but as far as I know it's not a blocker.  (My own
denyhosts package drops denyhosts.py into bindir so I can't really complain.)

Review:
* package meets naming and packaging guidelines.
* specfile is properly named, is cleanly written, uses macros consistently and
follows the Perl specfile template.
* license field matches the actual license.
* license is open source-compatible.  It's not included separately in the
package, but this is not necessary as the upstream tarball does not include it.
* source files match upstream:
   6e20e368ff101d8bc8f31eaa2d81c264  Module-ScanDeps-0.59.tar.gz
   6e20e368ff101d8bc8f31eaa2d81c264  Module-ScanDeps-0.59.tar.gz-srpm
* latest version is being packaged.
* BuildRequires are proper.
* package builds in mock (development, x86_64).
* rpmlint is silent.
* final provides and requires are sane.
* no shared libraries are present.
* package is not relocatable.
* owns the directories it creates.
* doesn't own any directories it shouldn't.
* no duplicates in %files.
* file permissions are appropriate.
* %clean is present.
* %check is present and all tests pass:
   All tests successful.
   Files=1, Tests=20,  2 wallclock secs ( 2.38 cusr +  0.32 csys =  2.70 CPU)
* no scriptlets present.
* code, not content.
* documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary.
* %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package.
* no headers.
* no pkgconfig files.
* no libtool .la droppings.
* not a GUI app.

APPROVED, but please double check the source URL and fix if necessary.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list