[Bug 189263] Review Request: rsibreak

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Sun May 14 19:54:34 UTC 2006


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: rsibreak


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189263


jpmahowald at gmail.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
         AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |jpmahowald at gmail.com
OtherBugsDependingO|163776                      |163779
              nThis|                            |




------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com  2006-05-14 15:54 EST -------
- rpmlint checks return clean
- package meets naming guidelines
- package meets packaging guidelines
- license (GPL) OK, text in %doc, matches source
- spec file legible, in am. english
- source matches upstream
- package compiles on FC5 (x86_64)
- no missing BR
- no unnecessary BR
- locales handled properly
- not relocatable
- owns all directories that it creates
- no duplicate files
- permissions ok
- %clean ok
- macro use consistent
- code, not content
- no need for -docs
- nothing in %doc affects runtime
- .desktop file 

There really is not a much better rpm group.

APPROVED

I'll sponsor if still needed, apply for cvsextras.

Note that when the package builds you can inform the rsibreak authors about the
Extras package.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list