[Bug 186892] Review Request: conntrack - Tool to manipulate netfilter connection tracking table

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Mon May 15 22:39:56 UTC 2006


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: conntrack - Tool to manipulate netfilter connection tracking table


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=186892


kevin at tummy.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
OtherBugsDependingO|163778                      |163779
              nThis|                            |




------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com  2006-05-15 18:39 EST -------
Here's a review:

OK - Rpmlint output. (none)
OK - Package name.
OK - Spec file name matches.
OK - Package guidelines.
OK - License (GPL)
OK - License field matches in spec.
OK - License included in files
OK - Spec in american english
OK - Spec legible
OK - Md5sum of source from upstream
7491f914a9ebce180df88cbef0d994b3  conntrack-1.00beta1.tar.bz2
7491f914a9ebce180df88cbef0d994b3  conntrack-1.00beta1.tar.bz2.1

OK - Compiles and builds on one arch at least.
(builds ok on devel, didn't use mock as not all requires are pushed out)
OK - No Forbidden buildrequires included
OK - All required buildrequires included
OK - Owns all directories it creates.
OK - No duplicate files in %files listing.
OK - Permissions on files correct.
OK - Clean section correct.
OK - Macros consistant.
OK - Code not content.
OK - Docs must not affect runtime.
OK - Doesn't own any files/dirs that are already owned by others.

No blockers I can see... so this package is APPROVED.

Remember to close this bug with NEXTRELEASE once you have imported
and build the package.


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list