[Bug 189609] Review Request: galago-daemon

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Wed May 17 20:14:17 UTC 2006


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: galago-daemon


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189609


jpmahowald at gmail.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
         AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |jpmahowald at gmail.com
OtherBugsDependingO|163776                      |163779
              nThis|                            |




------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com  2006-05-17 16:13 EST -------
- rpmlint checks return:
W: galago-daemon non-conffile-in-etc /etc/dbus-1/system.d/galago-daemon.conf
A non-executable file in your package is being installed in /etc, but is not
a configuration file. All non-executable files in /etc should be configuration
files. Mark the file as %config in the spec file.

W: galago-daemon non-standard-dir-in-usr libexec
Non standard but not without precedent. I'm inclined to ignore.

- package meets naming guidelines
- package meets packaging guidelines
- license (GPL) OK, text in %doc, matches source
- spec file legible, in am. english
- source matches upstream
- package compiles on FC5 (x86_64)
- no missing BR
- no unnecessary BR
- no locales
- not relocatable
- owns all directories that it creates
- no duplicate files
- permissions ok
- %clean ok
- macro use consistent
- code, not content
- no need for -docs
- nothing in %doc affects runtime
- no need for .desktop file 

Mark the config file as %config

APPROVED

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list