[Bug 169703] Review Request: pari - Number Theory-oriented Computer Algebra System

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Thu May 25 21:43:33 UTC 2006


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: pari - Number Theory-oriented Computer Algebra System


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=169703





------- Additional Comments From gemi at bluewin.ch  2006-05-25 17:35 EST -------
(In reply to comment #25)
> - Don't need BR gzip and perl
Ok.
> - Why the Requires: gzip?
I fact, gp can use gzip to load gzipped files, it seems. I moved the
Requires to the gp subpackage.

> - I would clean up some of the commented out stuff from the spec file, and the
> unneeded Patch.
Ok.

> - rpmlint:
> W: pari-gp devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/pari/examples/extgcd.c
> this should probably be in the -devel package.
The C example is in fact an example for a dynamic module loadable by gp.
So it effectively belong to gp and not to devel.
> 
> - The last sentence of the %description is odd, since this package contains the
> library:
I replace the last sentence by:
"This package contains the shared libraries. The interactive
calculator PARI/GP is in package %{name}-gp."

> - Do we even care about pari.cfg? 
users.dvi mentions it, so I thought I leave it in the docdir.

> - why not ship xgp and gpflog?
I would not ship xgp. I just added a .desktop file to start gp
in a terminal. I leave gpflog in.


(In reply to comment #26)
> Looks like:
> 
> # we move pari.cfg to the docdir
> rm -fr $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_libdir}/pari
> 
> needs to be:
> 
> # we move pari.cfg to the docdir
> rm -fr $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_prefix}/lib/pari
Ok.

http://math.ifi.unizh.ch/fedora/5/i386/SRPMS.gemi/pari-2.3.0-1.src.rpm


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list