[Bug 192540] Review Request: cal3d - A skeletal based 3-D character animation library
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Fri May 26 18:42:10 UTC 2006
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: cal3d - A skeletal based 3-D character animation library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192540
wart at kobold.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |wart at kobold.org
OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778
nThis| |
------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2006-05-26 14:34 EST -------
MUST
====
* rpmlint output clean
* source matches upstream
47b3b72c6adcf5351f0884639d606d05 cal3d-full-0.10.0.tar.bz2
* Macro usage consistent
* Package named appropriately
* Spec file legible and in Am. English
* headers, .pc, and unversioned .so's are in -devel
* -devel contains fully-versioned dependency on base package
* LGPL license ok, license file included
* No locales
* ldconfig called in %post/%postun for shared libs
* Not relocatable
* Owns directories that it creates
* No duplicate %files
* Builds in mock on:
FC4-i386, FC4-x86_64, FC5-i386, FC5-x86_64, devel-i386, devel-x86_64
SHOULD
======
* Ask upstream to include pregenerated configure scripts in their
published tarballs. I heard through the grapevine that upstream has moved
their download server off of sourceforge and produced a new source tarball that
doesn't require running 'autoreconf'. I'd suggest using that tarball, but won't
consider it a blocker.
* My personal preference is to remove the *.la files in %install instead
of %excluding them so that the %files section is cleaner.
MUSTFIX
=======
* Don't use %{name} in %description or the -devel package summary
* Remove the leading 'A' from the Summary
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
More information about the Fedora-package-review
mailing list