From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 1 03:04:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2006 22:04:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 199405] Review Request: vtk - The Visualization Toolkit - A high level 3D visualization library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611010304.kA134SRt021506@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vtk - The Visualization Toolkit - A high level 3D visualization library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199405 ------- Additional Comments From ed at eh3.com 2006-10-31 22:04 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=139933) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=139933&action=view) silence warnings about deprecated headers Here is a small patch that silences the deprecated headers [otherwise you get a lot of compier warnings when building VTK apps]. Please see: http://www.vtk.org/Bug/bug.php?op=vote&bugid=1457 where upstream so far refuses to address the issue. Also, the Debian VTK packages have a similar patch. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 1 03:18:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2006 22:18:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 199405] Review Request: vtk - The Visualization Toolkit - A high level 3D visualization library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611010318.kA13I1oQ022159@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vtk - The Visualization Toolkit - A high level 3D visualization library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199405 ------- Additional Comments From ed at eh3.com 2006-10-31 22:17 EST ------- Apparently the patch in comment #27 silences most of the warnings that I get in *my* VTK-using application but it doesn't go anywhere far enough. Please see: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=396283 http://vtk.org/Bug/bug.php?op=show&bugid=1953 and please ignore the patch in comment #27 since its not a real fix. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 1 03:49:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2006 22:49:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 209965] Review Request: ruby-bdb - Berkeley DB is an embedded database system that supports keyed access to data In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611010349.kA13nSAF024623@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-bdb - Berkeley DB is an embedded database system that supports keyed access to data https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209965 ------- Additional Comments From miker5slow at grandecom.net 2006-10-31 22:49 EST ------- I emailed Jochen on Thu, 26 Oct 2006 19:15:47 -0500 Still no word back yet.. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 1 04:47:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2006 23:47:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 212079] Review Request: freefont - Free UCS Outline Fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611010447.kA14l7tT028664@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: freefont - Free UCS Outline Fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212079 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 1 05:19:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2006 00:19:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 212836] Review Request: fwfstab - a graphical file system table (fstab) editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611010519.kA15JoRZ029902@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fwfstab - a graphical file system table (fstab) editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212836 ------- Additional Comments From pnemade at redhat.com 2006-11-01 00:19 EST ------- my /etc/fstab /dev/VolGroup00/LogVol00 / ext3 defaults 1 1 devpts /dev/pts devpts gid=5,mode=620 0 0 tmpfs /dev/shm tmpfs defaults 0 0 /dev/VolGroup00/LogVol01 /home ext3 defaults 1 2 /dev/VolGroup00/LogVol02 /usr ext3 defaults 1 2 proc /proc proc defaults 0 0 sysfs /sys sysfs defaults 0 0 /dev/VolGroup00/LogVol03 swap swap defaults 0 0 and i tried to add /dev/cdrom /mnt/cdrom ext3 i mean i filled 3 input boxes in Add entry box and then i save but i could not able to see any new added entry. will try on other machine also -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 1 05:23:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2006 00:23:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 209259] Review Request: beryl-core - Beryl OpenGL window and compositing manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611010523.kA15NrW7029984@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: beryl-core - Beryl OpenGL window and compositing manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209259 ------- Additional Comments From jwilson at redhat.com 2006-11-01 00:23 EST ------- (In reply to comment #8) > I have just tested the packages on a fresh installation. > All work well after installing libXcomposite manually (it's requiere). > > libXcomposite-devel and libXdamage-devel are requieres at build time for > beryl-core, beryl-plugins and beryl-settings. > > I also noticed that libwnck-devel is requiere by emerald. > > In any event, these missing build requieres will be easily found by mock when > the packages are review. As it happens, I was just working on this very thing earlier today, and had already pushed out new builds of most components. Most of the packages were missing BR on libtool and gettext-devel as well. Didn't catch the libwnck-devel BR on emerald though, so I went back through clean mock builds on every package. I just finished building all the latest versions of the packages a bit ago, and all appear to have appropriate BuildRequires in place now. Oh, I've also put together binaries for x86_64, i386 and ppc, for anyone that wants to play with them (along with a yum repo file, so folks can yum upgrade as new builds get pushed). http://wilsonet.com/packages/beryl/beryl.repo Re: comment #7, yeah, those look like they're built from my specs, heh. The W: about no- documentation is ignorable (similar warning on emerald-devel). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 1 06:02:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2006 01:02:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 194373] Review Request: kdeedu: Educational/Edutainment applications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611010602.kA1628YZ031178@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdeedu: Educational/Edutainment applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194373 gauret at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |gauret at free.fr OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From gauret at free.fr 2006-11-01 01:02 EST ------- Review for release 1: * RPM name is OK * Source kdeedu-3.5.5.tar.bz2 is the same as upstream * File lists look OK * Works as expected Needs work: * rpmlint of kdeedu: invalid-desktopfile kiten.desktop * Desktop file: the Categories tag should contain Application (wiki: PackagingGuidelines#desktop) Notes: * We decided to drop the X-Fedora category in desktop files, remeber to drop that for future releases * I'm not sure you should omit the *.py? files from packaging, for the same reason we don't %ghost the *.pyo files anymore. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 1 06:12:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2006 01:12:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 205798] Review Request: xine-lib - The Xine library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611010612.kA16CgBK031485@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xine-lib - The Xine library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205798 gauret at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From gauret at free.fr 2006-11-01 01:12 EST ------- Imported and built, thanks a lot ! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 1 06:19:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2006 01:19:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 194373] Review Request: kdeedu: Educational/Edutainment applications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611010619.kA16JerV031635@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdeedu: Educational/Edutainment applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194373 ------- Additional Comments From gauret at free.fr 2006-11-01 01:19 EST ------- Apparently, the entries appear in the menu even without the Application category (I checked KDE and GNOME's menus). I can't remember why it was required at some point, but the xml files in /etc/xdg/menus still reference Application. Any idea ? If it's not required anymore, I'll just move this to FE-ACCEPT. The kiten desktop file seems to have invalid UTF-8 on line 22 (which looks hebraic) $ desktop-file-validate /usr/share/applications/kde/kiten.desktop /usr/share/applications/kde/kiten.desktop: parse error: Error in section Desktop Entry at line 22: Invalid escaping in value I think it's more of a "fix it if you can" than a real "needs work". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 1 06:34:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2006 01:34:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 212079] Review Request: freefont - Free UCS Outline Fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611010634.kA16YZV8032223@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: freefont - Free UCS Outline Fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212079 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-11-01 01:34 EST ------- Review: + package builds fine in mock (development i386). + rpmlint is silent for RPM and SRPM. + source files match upstream. 822aba4e2ed065d9d3ded6e26e495854 freefont-ttf-20060126.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. License text included in package. + %doc is small so -doc subpackage not required. + %doc does not affect runtime. + COPYING included in %doc. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc files. + no -devel subpackage exists + no .la files. + no translations available + Provides: freefont-ttf = 20060126-3.fc6 + Requires(post): /bin/sh Requires(postun): /bin/sh Requires: /usr/share/fonts + Obsoletes: freefont-ttf < 20060126-3.fc6 + owns the directories it creates. + doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + scriptlets present and used according to its standards. + Not a GUI app APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 1 06:35:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2006 01:35:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 212079] Review Request: freefont - Free UCS Outline Fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611010635.kA16ZpXD032288@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: freefont - Free UCS Outline Fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212079 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-11-01 01:35 EST ------- Don't forget to CLOSE this BUG once you imported this package in CVS. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 1 07:53:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2006 02:53:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 203520] Review Request: evolution-brutus In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611010753.kA17rQSf003504@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: evolution-brutus Alias: evolution-brutus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203520 ------- Additional Comments From colding at omesc.com 2006-11-01 02:53 EST ------- (In reply to comment #44) > A. > Oh, please don't change the original source tarball without changing > its version!! This will confuse people who use evolution-brutus. OK, I'll just release new versions instead. > B. > I have not yet rebuilt the new srpm you uploaded, however: > I use rawhide, and Fedora Extras packages have to be rebuilt firstly > for rawhide environment as buildsys forces it. > > I have to say that current evolution and evolution-data-server in rawhide is: > [tasaka1 at localhost ~]$ rpm -q evolution evolution-data-server > evolution-2.9.1-2.fc7 > evolution-data-server-1.9.1-2.fc7 > > Please adjust your spec file for these versions. > Through a glance look at your spec, > > %dir %{_includedir}/evolution-data-server-1.8/brutus > > This is no longer correct as current (current means rawhide) > evolution-data-server has: /usr/include/evolution-data-server-1.10/ . > Please use %dir %{_includedir}/evolution-data-server-*/brutus to > avoid version changing (also please check if there is some API change or > so). Just one question: All of these version dependancies are detected during a run of autogen.sh and are then used when the spec is created from the spec.in. Should I remove all of this "clever" version detection stuff and just use '*' whereever a version dependent directory shows up? The same goes for my locale file. It has generally been like this: evolution-brutus-VERSION.mo I did this after looking in several spec files, such as the evolution-connector spec. This spec has currently(*): %files -f evolution-exchange-%{evo_major}.lang where evo_major is defined in the top of the spec. There is a lot of hardcoded (via %define) paths in that spec. This must surely be wrong, yes? BTW, the evolution-connector spec does not use find-lang. Is that wrong? Thanks, jules (*) http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/evolution-connector/evolution-connector.spec?view=markup -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 1 12:00:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2006 07:00:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 201000] Review Request: libFoundation - A free implementation of OpenStep's Foundation Kit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611011200.kA1C0wSq022536@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libFoundation - A free implementation of OpenStep's Foundation Kit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201000 ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2006-11-01 07:00 EST ------- Over two weeks have passed and the package is still not built for FC-5. *ping* -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 1 13:17:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2006 08:17:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 212836] Review Request: fwfstab - a graphical file system table (fstab) editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611011317.kA1DHKf9029164@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fwfstab - a graphical file system table (fstab) editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212836 ------- Additional Comments From s.adam at diffingo.com 2006-11-01 08:17 EST ------- Worked for me: $ cat /etc/fstab ... /dev/cdrom auto /mnt/cdrom defaults 0 0 What where all the fields that you put in? The program will refuse to add a entry with a black 'filesystem' or 'options' for example, because then it would cause errors in the fstab. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 1 13:31:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2006 08:31:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 208169] Review Request: python-twisted-core - An asynchronous networking framework written in Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611011331.kA1DVrX0030210@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-twisted-core - An asynchronous networking framework written in Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208169 ------- Additional Comments From thomas at apestaart.org 2006-11-01 08:31 EST ------- http://thomas.apestaart.org/download/pkg/fedora-5-i386-extras/python-twisted-core-2.4.0-4.fc5/ I took some of Jeffrey's changes (with credit) but not all. - I want to keep the %{__python} macros, I adapted the spec from pyvault and I'd prefer to keep differences reasonable. - I want to keep the %{origname} macro - the Spec already uses $RPM_BUILD_ROOT so I don't want to mix with %{buildroot} - I prefer the manifest as it is because this allows me to notice new files when I update for new source releases, and that allows me to fix the problems that are similar to the current ones mentioned (packaging .c files, wrong execution, ...) These updated packages do not generate any rpmlint warnings for me anymore. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 1 13:55:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2006 08:55:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 199183] Review Request: e2tools - Manipulate files in unmounted ext2/ext3 filesystems In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611011355.kA1DtpnA032626@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: e2tools - Manipulate files in unmounted ext2/ext3 filesystems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199183 andreas at bawue.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 1 14:04:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2006 09:04:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 198644] new package suggestion: keepass In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611011404.kA1E4BiE001135@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: new package suggestion: keepass https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198644 ------- Additional Comments From pb at bieringer.de 2006-11-01 09:04 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=139974) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=139974&action=view) Proposal for a spec file Spec file is taken from author's supplied SRPMS and modified for FC6 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 1 14:35:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2006 09:35:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213432] New: Review Request: kaffeine - Xine-based media player Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213432 Summary: Review Request: kaffeine - Xine-based media player Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rdieter at math.unl.edu QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://kde-redhat.unl.edu/apt/kde-redhat/SPECS/kaffeine.spec SRPM URL: http://kde-redhat.unl.edu/apt/kde-redhat/all/SRPMS.stable/kaffeine-0.8.2-2.src.rpm Description: Kaffeine is a xine-based media player for KDE. It plays back CDs, and VCDs. It also decodes multimedia files (like AVI, MOV, WMV) from local disk drives, and displays multimedia streamed over the Internet. It interprets many of the most common multimedia formats available - and some of the most uncommon formats, too. Additionally, Kaffeine is fully integrated in KDE, it supports drag and drop and provides an editable playlist, a bookmark system, a Konqueror plugin, OSD and much more. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 1 14:53:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2006 09:53:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 209311] Review Request: espeak - Software speech synthesizer (text-to-speech) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611011453.kA1ErUZF005697@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: espeak - Software speech synthesizer (text-to-speech) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209311 michel.salim at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |michel.salim at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From michel.salim at gmail.com 2006-11-01 09:53 EST ------- Ping? Sounds like an interesting package, but as Mamoru noted, we can't get to it -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 1 14:55:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2006 09:55:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 210007] Review Request: - In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611011455.kA1Et1U6005821@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210007 ------- Additional Comments From konradr at redhat.com 2006-11-01 09:54 EST ------- 1). Licenses. The spec files says GPL v2.1, the tests,scripts, and templates usE GPL v2.0 and the lib uses LGPG. There are no GPL v2.1, there is LGPG v2.1, which is what I think you meant for the spec file, but it states: " This library is free software; you can redistribute it and/or # modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public # License as published by the Free Software Foundation; either # version 2.1 of the License, or (at your option) any later version. " The field: License has only LGPL, but this has GPL as well (in -devel) package. 2). rpmlint: [konrad at dyn448114 i386]$ rpmlint -v libtune-devel-0.10-2.i386.rpm I: libtune-devel checking W: libtune-devel service-default-enabled /etc/rc.d/init.d/chtunedb W: libtune-devel incoherent-init-script-name chtunedb I would consider the two above to be harmless and intentional. 3). It fails compilation on 64-bit (this FC5-x86_64) make: Leaving directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/libtune-0.10-2/templates' + db/libtuncleandb /var/tmp/libtune-0.10-2-root-brewbuilder//usr/share/libtune/tundb_kernel /var/tmp/libtune-0.10-2-root-brewbuilder//usr/share/libtune/tundb_distro + /usr/lib/rpm/find-debuginfo.sh /builddir/build/BUILD/libtune-0.10-2 0 blocks find: /var/tmp/libtune-0.10-2-root-brewbuilder/usr/lib/debug: No such file or directory + /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/brp-compress + /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/brp-strip-static-archive /usr/bin/strip + /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/brp-strip-comment-note /usr/bin/strip /usr/bin/objdump + /usr/lib/rpm/brp-python-bytecompile Processing files: libtune-0.10-2 error: File not found: /var/tmp/libtune-0.10-2-root-brewbuilder/usr/lib64/libtune.la error: File not found by glob: /var/tmp/libtune-0.10-2-root-brewbuilder/usr/lib64/libtune.so.* Executing(%doc): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.80952 + umask 022 + cd /builddir/build/BUILD + cd libtune-0.10-2 + DOCDIR=/var/tmp/libtune-0.10-2-root-brewbuilder/usr/share/doc/libtune-0.10 + export DOCDIR + rm -rf /var/tmp/libtune-0.10-2-root-brewbuilder/usr/share/doc/libtune-0.10 + /bin/mkdir -p /var/tmp/libtune-0.10-2-root-brewbuilder/usr/share/doc/libtune-0.10 + cp -pr COPYING lib/LGPL ChangeLog /var/tmp/libtune-0.10-2-root-brewbuilder/usr/share/doc/libtune-0.10 + exit 0 Processing files: libtune-devel-0.10-2 error: File not found: /var/tmp/libtune-0.10-2-root-brewbuilder/usr/lib64/libtune.a error: File not found: /var/tmp/libtune-0.10-2-root-brewbuilder/usr/lib64/libtune.so Executing(%doc): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.80952 + umask 022 + cd /builddir/build/BUILD + cd libtune-0.10-2 + DOCDIR=/var/tmp/libtune-0.10-2-root-brewbuilder/usr/share/doc/libtune-devel-0.10 + export DOCDIR + rm -rf /var/tmp/libtune-0.10-2-root-brewbuilder/usr/share/doc/libtune-devel-0.10 + /bin/mkdir -p /var/tmp/libtune-0.10-2-root-brewbuilder/usr/share/doc/libtune-devel-0.10 + cp -pr templates/GPL /var/tmp/libtune-0.10-2-root-brewbuilder/usr/share/doc/libtune-devel-0.10 + exit 0 Processing files: tunables-data-2.6.16-0.10-2 Provides: tunables-generic-data = 0.10 Requires(interp): /bin/sh /bin/sh Requires(rpmlib): rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 rpmlib(VersionedDependencies) <= 3.0.3-1 Requires(post): /bin/sh Requires(preun): /bin/sh Requires: /bin/sh Processing files: tunables-data-2.6.18-0.10-2 Provides: tunables-generic-data = 0.10 Requires(interp): /bin/sh /bin/sh Requires(rpmlib): rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 rpmlib(VersionedDependencies) <= 3.0.3-1 Requires(post): /bin/sh Requires(preun): /bin/sh Requires: /bin/sh Processing files: tunables-data-FC5-2.6.16-0.10-2 Provides: tunables-distro-data = 0.10 Requires(interp): /bin/sh /bin/sh Requires(rpmlib): rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 rpmlib(VersionedDependencies) <= 3.0.3-1 Requires(post): /bin/sh Requires(preun): /bin/sh Requires: tunables-data-2.6.16 = 0.10 Processing files: tunables-data-FC6-2.6.18-0.10-2 Provides: tunables-distro-data = 0.10 Requires(interp): /bin/sh /bin/sh Requires(rpmlib): rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 rpmlib(VersionedDependencies) <= 3.0.3-1 Requires(post): /bin/sh Requires(preun): /bin/sh Requires: tunables-data-2.6.18 = 0.10 Processing files: libtune-debuginfo-0.10-2 RPM build errors: File not found: /var/tmp/libtune-0.10-2-root-brewbuilder/usr/lib64/libtune.la File not found by glob: /var/tmp/libtune-0.10-2-root-brewbuilder/usr/lib64/libtune.so.* File not found: /var/tmp/libtune-0.10-2-root-brewbuilder/usr/lib64/libtune.a File not found: /var/tmp/libtune-0.10-2-root-brewbuilder/usr/lib64/libtune.so -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 1 15:09:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2006 10:09:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 205755] Review Request: elsa - manages group of processes and allows accounting In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611011509.kA1F9f4Y007114@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: elsa - manages group of processes and allows accounting https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205755 konradr at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jcm at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From konradr at redhat.com 2006-11-01 10:09 EST ------- I am putting Jon Masters on the CC. Jon, please take a look at #comment #5. Your guidance in this would be much appreciated. Guillaume, I tried to build your package on FC5, and I get this: ++ cut --delimiter=- -f 3,4 + CFLAGS='-O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m32 -march=i386 -mtune=generic -fasynchronous-unwind-tables' + make -j3 USER_INCLUDES=-I/usr/src/kernels/2.6.15-1.2054_FC5 2.6.17-1.2187_FC5-i686/include make: *** No rule to make target `2.6.17-1.2187_FC5-i686/include'. Stop. error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.7878 (%build) RPM build errors: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.7878 (%build) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 1 15:33:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2006 10:33:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 209311] Review Request: espeak - Software speech synthesizer (text-to-speech) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611011533.kA1FXa5D009718@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: espeak - Software speech synthesizer (text-to-speech) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209311 ------- Additional Comments From faucamp at csir.co.za 2006-11-01 10:33 EST ------- Hmm... it seems the person had who graciously provided me with some server space is having some router problems... :-/ I have moved to the spec and SRPM to where I put the flite (#207793) stuff: Spec URL: http://dialogpalette.sourceforge.net/extras/fedora/espeak.spec SRPM URL: http://dialogpalette.sourceforge.net/extras/fedora/espeak-1.16-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 1 15:35:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2006 10:35:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 212836] Review Request: fwfstab - a graphical file system table (fstab) editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611011535.kA1FZHZS009935@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fwfstab - a graphical file system table (fstab) editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212836 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-11-01 10:35 EST ------- hi, Are you sure above is correct? I also got it working and got following line /dev/cdrom auto /mnt/cdrom defaults 1 0 then i immediately gave following command and it failed [root at localhost ~]# mount /dev/cdrom mount: mount point auto does not exist so its wrong. it must be /dev/cdrom /mnt/cdrom auto defaults 1 0 and it worked. check its entering wrong line in /etc/fstab -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 1 15:38:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2006 10:38:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 203520] Review Request: evolution-brutus In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611011538.kA1Fc8Kk010428@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: evolution-brutus Alias: evolution-brutus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203520 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-11-01 10:38 EST ------- (In reply to comment #45) > Just one question: All of these version dependancies are detected during a run > of autogen.sh and are then used when the spec is created from the spec.in. > Should I remove all of this "clever" version detection stuff and just use '*' > whereever a version dependent directory shows up? It is up to you. If hardcoded number is worth writing for you, I prefer that you write the specific version by using macro as you said (e.g. %define evo_ver 2.9.1). > BTW, the evolution-connector spec does not use find-lang. Is that wrong? I have not yet checked this, however, perhaps it is wrong if this package includes gettext mo files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 1 15:57:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2006 10:57:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 200666] Review Request: theora-exp - Experimental theora decoder In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611011557.kA1FvO5R012826@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: theora-exp - Experimental theora decoder https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200666 ------- Additional Comments From dmitry at butskoy.name 2006-11-01 10:57 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=139996) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=139996&action=view) suggestions for the spec file - Maybe better to use "svn release" instead of "cvs date" ? - The "man version" seems to be 0.0.1 (atleast according to result library's .so.0.0.1 ) - The "doc/" subdir can be removed from svn source too (it can significantly decrease the size of srpm :) ) - Maybe enable encoding support too? And how about tools/ subdir? - Maybe include "examples/" dir into %doc for devel subpackage? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 1 15:58:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2006 10:58:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 209214] Review Request: libprelude - Prelude library collection In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611011558.kA1Fw8bZ012950@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libprelude - Prelude library collection https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209214 ------- Additional Comments From tscherf at redhat.com 2006-11-01 10:58 EST ------- ping?! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 1 16:19:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2006 11:19:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 209965] Review Request: ruby-bdb - Berkeley DB is an embedded database system that supports keyed access to data In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611011619.kA1GJdqE015109@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-bdb - Berkeley DB is an embedded database system that supports keyed access to data https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209965 Jochen at herr-schmitt.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From Jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2006-11-01 11:19 EST ------- Good: + Tarball match with upstream. + Local build works fine. + No complaints on source rpm from rpmlint. + No complaints on installed rpm from rpmlint. + Local inatall/uninstall works fine. + Mock build works fine. Bad: - Package doesn't contains a varbatin copy of the license (no blocker) You are APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 1 17:05:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2006 12:05:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 211626] Review Request: xtide - Calculate tide all over the world In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611011705.kA1H5Xdi019619@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xtide - Calculate tide all over the world https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211626 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-11-01 12:05 EST ------- Well, I will mail to upstream today (in Japan). NOTE: I will be busy through next Wednesday and I may have less connectibity. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 1 17:15:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2006 12:15:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 175168] Review Request: gideon - GUI designer for GTK/C++ In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611011715.kA1HFpVQ020624@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gideon - GUI designer for GTK/C++ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175168 ------- Additional Comments From denis at poolshark.org 2006-11-01 12:15 EST ------- The project was renamed to crow, or 'Crow Designer'. Plus 2.8.1 update. http://www.poolshark.org/src/crow.spec http://www.poolshark.org/src/crow-2.8.1-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 1 17:17:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2006 12:17:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 209311] Review Request: espeak - Software speech synthesizer (text-to-speech) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611011717.kA1HHHvq020761@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: espeak - Software speech synthesizer (text-to-speech) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209311 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-11-01 12:17 EST ------- Well, just a quick look at this package: A. From http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines : * Filesystem Layout (and others) - I think installing header files into /usr/include should be avoided, they should be installed under /usr/include/espeak. - By the way, why do you install only 'speak_lib.h'? I can find other header files. - http://espeak.sourceforge.net/index.html ----------------------------------------------------- The project name speak had already been taken by another project on SourceForge (for a Windows TTS front-end) so I added a letter 'e' to the front to make eSpeak. For now, the program executable remains speak and is referred to as such in the documentation. ----------------------------------------------------- I think the binary name 'speak' is somewhat troublesome and recommend that the name should be 'espeak' (and the related documentation should be changed). - Check if /usr/share/espeak-data/soundicons/ is required as this is a empty directory. * BuildRequires: - By the way, is 'portaudio' requires for BuildRequires? * Compiler flags - Fedora specific compiler flags are not passed and this leads to useless debuginfo rpm. B. From http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines : = Perhaps nothing, however, I just did a quick look... C. Other things I have noticed. * Installation process. - Well, I think the installation process of this package is somewhat illegible. Especially, the need of explicit description of soname in spec file should be avoided as you have to check if soname of shared library is changed each time you build this. This should be something like: -------------------------------------------------------- cd src install -m 0755 libespeak.so.*.*.* %{buildroot}%{_libdir} ln -sf libespeak.so.*.*.* %{buildroot}%{_libdir}/libespeak.so /sbin/ldconfig -n %{buildroot}%{_libdir}/ -------------------------------------------------------- * Voice data - Well, I cannot verify the license issue of binary voice data named *_dict as this is a binary. If these data can be reproduced from ascii text files, it should do so. By a quick look, 'speak' has a option of '--compile=?'. Is it possible to recompile voice data *dict files by this? (Note: executing 'speak' binary requires 'portaudio' on BuildRequires. Also, by default 'speak --compile=?' needs superuser admin as it tries to access /usr/share/espeak so a patch is required to make 'speak' binary have the argument of output files) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 1 17:27:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2006 12:27:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 209311] Review Request: espeak - Software speech synthesizer (text-to-speech) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611011727.kA1HRFqh022115@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: espeak - Software speech synthesizer (text-to-speech) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209311 ------- Additional Comments From michel.salim at gmail.com 2006-11-01 12:27 EST ------- Just adding a few things: - portaudio is a BuildRequire (see Makefile), so that's fine. It's a bit confusing that there is no portaudio-devel - Might want to create an 'install' target in the Makefile and do the copy operations there. This way you can push the changes upstream. Probably put the RPM_OPT_FLAGS changes in a separate diff since that's Fedora-specific - Tested on x86_64 Has anyone sponsored you yet? I can't do it myself, but you might want to mention it on the mailing list -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 1 17:32:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2006 12:32:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 209311] Review Request: espeak - Software speech synthesizer (text-to-speech) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611011732.kA1HWa6c023023@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: espeak - Software speech synthesizer (text-to-speech) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209311 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-11-01 12:32 EST ------- Well, I am a membership of sponsors and I can sponsor Francois if I can judge it is preferable. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 1 18:53:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2006 13:53:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 210758] Review Request: aspell-fa - Persian dictionaries for Aspell In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611011853.kA1Irr8e000778@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aspell-fa - Persian dictionaries for Aspell https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210758 ------- Additional Comments From mola at c100c.com 2006-11-01 13:53 EST ------- update rpmlint warning Specfile : http://www.c100c.com/fedora/aspell6-fa.spec SRPM : http://www.c100c.com/fedora/aspell6-fa-0.10-0.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 1 18:57:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2006 13:57:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213511] New: Review Request: gxine - Gnome frontend for the xine multimedia library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213511 Summary: Review Request: gxine - Gnome frontend for the xine multimedia library Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mola at c100c.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://c100c.com/fedora/gxine.spec SRPM URL: http://www.c100c.com/fedora/gxine-0.5.8-1.src.rpm Description: gxine is a fully-featured free audio/video player for unix-like systems which uses libxine for audio/video decoding and playback. For more informations on what formats are supported, please refer to the libxine documentation. gxine is a gtk based gui for this xine-library alternate to xine-ui. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 1 19:16:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2006 14:16:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213432] Review Request: kaffeine - Xine-based media player In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611011916.kA1JGihj002463@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kaffeine - Xine-based media player https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213432 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-11-01 14:16 EST ------- Spec URL: http://kde-redhat.unl.edu/apt/kde-redhat/SPECS/kaffeine.spec SRPM URL: http://kde-redhat.unl.edu/apt/kde-redhat/all/SRPMS.stable/kaffeine-0.8.2-3.src.rpm %changelog * Wed Nov 01 2006 Rex Dieter 0.8.2-3 - update %%description to not mention any specific mm containers (like AVI, WMV). Description: Kaffeine is a xine-based media player for KDE. It plays back CDs, and VCDs, and can decode all (local or streamed) multimedia formats supported by xine-lib. Additionally, Kaffeine is fully integrated in KDE, it supports drag and drop and provides an editable playlist, a bookmark system, a Konqueror plugin, OSD and much more. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 1 19:32:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2006 14:32:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 175168] Review Request: gideon - GUI designer for GTK/C++ In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611011932.kA1JW2ob004092@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gideon - GUI designer for GTK/C++ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175168 sundaram at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |sundaram at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From sundaram at redhat.com 2006-11-01 14:31 EST ------- You might want to reconsider the decision to include this package into Fedora Extras. Development on this project has been abandoned. http://mail.gnome.org/archives/desktop-devel-list/2006-October/msg00474.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 1 19:42:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2006 14:42:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 210823] Review Request: wxsvg - wxSVG is C++ library to create, manipulate and render SVG files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611011942.kA1Jg8Er005471@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wxsvg - wxSVG is C++ library to create, manipulate and render SVG files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210823 mola at c100c.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(mola at c100c.com) | ------- Additional Comments From mola at c100c.com 2006-11-01 14:42 EST ------- for license : http://www.wxwindows.org/about/newlicen.htm for version and release field that i change it . the source0 field haven't correct URL for source and for pregenerate i send mail to developer :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 1 20:30:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2006 15:30:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 203864] Review Request: tripwire - IDS In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611012030.kA1KUvhW009804@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tripwire - IDS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203864 ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2006-11-01 15:30 EST ------- (?)1. package meets naming and packaging guidelines. Release: 1%{?dist}.4 This should be: Release: 4%{?dist} 2. specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. 3. dist tag is present. 4. build root is correct. %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) 5. license field matches the actual license. 6. license is open source-compatible (GPL). License text included in package. 7. source files match upstream: b371f79ac23cacc9ad40b1da76b4a0c4 tripwire-2.4.0.1-src.tar.bz2 8. latest version is being packaged. 9. BuildRequires are proper. (?)10. package builds in mock ( ). 11. rpmlint is silent. (?)12. final provides and requires are sane: config(tripwire) = 2.4.0.1-1.4 tripwire = 2.4.0.1-1.4 = config(tripwire) = 2.4.0.1-1.4 gawk grep gzip libcrypto.so.6()(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1()(64bit) libm.so.6()(64bit) libstdc++.so.6()(64bit) sed tar What is Requires: sed grep gzip tar gawk needed for? 13. no shared libraries are present. 14. package is not relocatable. 15. owns the directories it creates. 16. doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. 17. no duplicates in %files. (?)18. file permissions are appropriate. %attr(0755,root,root) %dir %{_sysconfdir}/tripwire possibly, this should be 0700 19. %clean is present. 20. %check is not present (?)21. scriptlets are ok Requires(post): sed is missing. Also, don't print anything in %post. 22. code, not content. 23. documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. 24. %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. 25. no headers. 26. no pkgconfig files. 27. no libtool .la droppings. 28. not a GUI app. 29. not a web app. Please take care of 1, 12, 18 and 21 while I build it in mock. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 1 21:15:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2006 16:15:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 191175] Review Request: pyserial - Python serial port access library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611012115.kA1LFnv8014228@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyserial - Python serial port access library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191175 ------- Additional Comments From i at stingr.net 2006-11-01 16:15 EST ------- http://stingr.net/l/fe/pyserial.spec http://stingr.net/l/fe/pyserial-2.2-3.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 1 21:50:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2006 16:50:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 212836] Review Request: fwfstab - a graphical file system table (fstab) editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611012150.kA1LoKkf016936@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fwfstab - a graphical file system table (fstab) editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212836 ------- Additional Comments From s.adam at diffingo.com 2006-11-01 16:50 EST ------- Fixed... SPEC: http://www.diffingo.com/downloads/fwfstab/fwfstab.spec SRPM: http://www.diffingo.com/downloads/fwfstab/fwfstab-0.01-3.src.rpm RPM: http://www.diffingo.com/downloads/fwfstab/fwfstab-0.01-3.noarch.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 1 22:04:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2006 17:04:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 209311] Review Request: espeak - Software speech synthesizer (text-to-speech) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611012204.kA1M4uKY017942@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: espeak - Software speech synthesizer (text-to-speech) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209311 ------- Additional Comments From bugs.michael at gmx.net 2006-11-01 17:04 EST ------- "portaudio-devel" is a virtual sub-package of "portaudio", so you can do "BuildRequires: portaudio-devel" just fine and ought to prefer doing it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 1 22:41:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2006 17:41:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 209965] Review Request: ruby-bdb - Berkeley DB is an embedded database system that supports keyed access to data In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611012241.kA1Mfgdw021249@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-bdb - Berkeley DB is an embedded database system that supports keyed access to data https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209965 miker5slow at grandecom.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From miker5slow at grandecom.net 2006-11-01 17:41 EST ------- Thank you for the help on this one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 1 23:15:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2006 18:15:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 175168] Review Request: gideon - GUI designer for GTK/C++ In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611012315.kA1NFk3a023169@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gideon - GUI designer for GTK/C++ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175168 ------- Additional Comments From denis at poolshark.org 2006-11-01 18:15 EST ------- Gosh, thanks for pointing me to the thread. I'm not on the gnome mailing list and didn't know about this. Nothing of it was mentioned on the Gideon google group which i'm subscribed to... I think you're right, which is a shame because i like this tool from the start and it has reached a pretty stable point. I'll wait a few weeks to see if someone picks up the project... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 1 23:23:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2006 18:23:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 188542] Review Request: hylafax In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611012323.kA1NNiF0023645@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hylafax https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188542 ------- Additional Comments From faxguy at howardsilvan.com 2006-11-01 18:23 EST ------- Christoph, thank you very much for your time. I have updated the spec file and the srpm and they match each other this time, too. I've made changes as you have suggested. http://osdn.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/hylafax/hylafax.spec http://osdn.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/hylafax/hylafax-5.0.0-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 2 01:40:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2006 20:40:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 205755] Review Request: elsa - manages group of processes and allows accounting In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611020140.kA21efWd031085@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: elsa - manages group of processes and allows accounting https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205755 ------- Additional Comments From matthltc at us.ibm.com 2006-11-01 20:40 EST ------- The build machine apparently has several devel packages so the value in kversion has whitespace in it. Here are the relevant .spec snippets: %define kversion `rpm -q kernel-devel | cut --delimiter='-' -f 3,4` ... %build CFLAGS="%{optflags}" make %{?_smp_mflags} USER_INCLUDES=-I/usr/src/kernels/%{kversion}-%{_host_cpu}/include As a quick fix you could try to replace kversion's define with: %define kversion `rpm -q kernel-devel | head -n 1 | cut --delimiter='-' -f 3,4` The question is if there's a better way to select which kernel devel RPM to use. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 2 01:44:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2006 20:44:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 205755] Review Request: elsa - manages group of processes and allows accounting In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611020144.kA21iK4l031454@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: elsa - manages group of processes and allows accounting https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205755 ------- Additional Comments From matthltc at us.ibm.com 2006-11-01 20:44 EST ------- (In reply to comment #7) > The build machine apparently has several devel packages so the value in kversion > has whitespace in it. Here are the relevant .spec snippets: -----8<----- I didn't word the original reply correctly -- I'm *guessing* that this is the problem. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 2 02:53:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2006 21:53:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213511] Review Request: gxine - Gnome frontend for the xine multimedia library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611020253.kA22rJiI001972@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gxine - Gnome frontend for the xine multimedia library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213511 michel.salim at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |michel.salim at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From michel.salim at gmail.com 2006-11-01 21:53 EST ------- Preliminary review: rpmlint: - clean on srpm - one warning on binary: "incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.5.8 0.5.8-1" To fix this, add the release number to your changelog entries BuildRequires: glib2-devel is redundant (pulled in by gtk2-devel) gettext is missing You need to use the find_lang macro to find the locale files, not hardcode them yourself: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-8c605ebf8330f6d505f384e671986fa99a8f72ee -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 2 04:09:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2006 23:09:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 207793] Review Request: flite - Small, fast speech synthesis engine (text-to-speech) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611020409.kA249U6T006902@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: flite - Small, fast speech synthesis engine (text-to-speech) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207793 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-11-01 23:09 EST ------- Assigning to me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 2 04:10:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2006 23:10:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 207793] Review Request: flite - Small, fast speech synthesis engine (text-to-speech) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611020410.kA24AH1s006973@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: flite - Small, fast speech synthesis engine (text-to-speech) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207793 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 2 04:28:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2006 23:28:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 207793] Review Request: flite - Small, fast speech synthesis engine (text-to-speech) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611020428.kA24SLMn008431@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: flite - Small, fast speech synthesis engine (text-to-speech) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207793 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-11-01 23:28 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=140079) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=140079&action=view) Patch to try to make parallel Well, as far as I noticed by now... 1. parallel make is broken in i386, also. I sometimes fails parallel make -j3 on i386. This is because config/common_make_rules is broken. This file does not check if needed object files are already built before trying to make static ar file. Please check if my patch attached fixes the problem. 2. Well, you try to provide shared libraries which upstream doesn't by attaching a patch, do you? I have not yet checked the patch, however please make the following sure: 2-1. Please explain why the soname version '1.3' is proper. Are there any assurance that the API of the libraries won't change during 1.X version? 2-2 The shared libraries are 'partially' broken. 'Partially' means that libraries in flite includes undefined non-weak symbols. -------------------------------------------------------------------------- W: flite undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libflite_cmu_time_awb.so.1.3 clunits_synth W: flite undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libflite_cmu_time_awb.so.1.3 cmu_syl_boundary W: flite undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libflite_cmu_time_awb.so.1.3 lexicon_val W: flite undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libflite_cmu_time_awb.so.1.3 feat_set_int W: flite undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libflite_cmu_time_awb.so.1.3 feat_set W: flite undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libflite_cmu_time_awb.so.1.3 usenglish_init .......... (too many, cannot write all of them) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- You can check these by 'ldd -r /usr/lib/libflite.so.1.3', for example. If these libraries are used only by binaries in flite rpm, this may be ignored for a moment (some reviewers disagree). However, it seems that you want to provide -devel package, for which case, this problem should be fixed because undefined non-weak symbols disables correct linkage. 3. I suggest that when applying patches the suffixes should be changed for different patches. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 2 05:14:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2006 00:14:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 212836] Review Request: fwfstab - a graphical file system table (fstab) editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611020514.kA25E2wX011712@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fwfstab - a graphical file system table (fstab) editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212836 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-11-02 00:14 EST ------- Are you sure you really fixed bug? i think i am still getting same results as with old package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 2 05:15:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2006 00:15:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 207793] Review Request: flite - Small, fast speech synthesis engine (text-to-speech) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611020515.kA25FgNY011781@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: flite - Small, fast speech synthesis engine (text-to-speech) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207793 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-11-02 00:15 EST ------- Another issues: 4. The binaries /usr/bin/flite and /usr/bin/flite_time do not use the shared libraries included in flite main rpm (You can check it by: [tasaka1 at localhost i386]$ ldd -r /usr/bin/flite linux-gate.so.1 => (0x003d5000) libm.so.6 => /lib/libm.so.6 (0x002c8000) libasound.so.2 => /lib/libasound.so.2 (0x07d7b000) libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0x00189000) /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x0016c000) libdl.so.2 => /lib/libdl.so.2 (0x002f1000) ) I wonder if shared libraries and -devel packages are really required...... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 2 05:16:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2006 00:16:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 212836] Review Request: fwfstab - a graphical file system table (fstab) editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611020516.kA25GGAD011814@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fwfstab - a graphical file system table (fstab) editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212836 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-11-02 00:16 EST ------- one more thing you increased rpm package release number. AFAIK this bug is releated with source tarball and if you have modified source tarball then you must increase tarball version also. Fix all then will do official review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 2 06:16:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2006 01:16:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213594] New: Review Request: eclipse-phpeclipse Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213594 Summary: Review Request: eclipse-phpeclipse Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fedora at theholbrooks.org QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://theholbrooks.org/RPMS/eclipse-phpeclipse.spec SRPM URL: http://theholbrooks.org/RPMS/eclipse-phpeclipse-1.1.8-8.src.rpm Description: This is a RESUBMISSION of eclipse-phpeclipse after the last review (Bug 203025) Stalled. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 2 06:17:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2006 01:17:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213595] New: Review Request: tbcload - Tcl bytecode loader Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213595 Summary: Review Request: tbcload - Tcl bytecode loader Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: wart at kobold.org QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.kobold.org/~wart/fedora/tbcload.spec SRPM URL: http://www.kobold.org/~wart/fedora/tbcload-1.4-1.20061030cvs.src.rpm Description: Bytecode loader for precompiled Tcl files. Note: Upstream has not released official tarballs of this package. When I asked about it, they said they did not have time for generating official releases and that CVS snapshots should be used instead. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 2 06:18:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2006 01:18:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 203205] Review Request: eclipse-phpeclipse In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611020618.kA26IRZu014147@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-phpeclipse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203205 fedora at theholbrooks.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE ------- Additional Comments From fedora at theholbrooks.org 2006-11-02 01:18 EST ------- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 213594 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 2 06:18:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2006 01:18:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213594] Review Request: eclipse-phpeclipse In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611020618.kA26ISBb014162@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-phpeclipse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213594 fedora at theholbrooks.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bkonrath at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From fedora at theholbrooks.org 2006-11-02 01:18 EST ------- *** Bug 203205 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 2 06:19:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2006 01:19:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213596] New: Review Request: tclcompiler - Tcl bytecode compiler Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213596 Summary: Review Request: tclcompiler - Tcl bytecode compiler Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: wart at kobold.org QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.kobold.org/~wart/fedora/tclcompiler.spec SRPM URL: http://www.kobold.org/~wart/fedora/tclcompiler-1.5-1.20061030cvs.src.rpm Description: Tcl bytecode compiler. This module can be used to precompile Tcl files into Tcl's internal bytecode format for faster loading. Note: Upstream has not released official tarballs of this package. When I asked about it, they said they did not have time for generating official releases and that CVS snapshots should be used instead. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 2 06:20:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2006 01:20:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213596] Review Request: tclcompiler - Tcl bytecode compiler In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611020620.kA26KIr9014285@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tclcompiler - Tcl bytecode compiler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213596 wart at kobold.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |213595 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 2 06:20:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2006 01:20:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213595] Review Request: tbcload - Tcl bytecode loader In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611020620.kA26KJ62014291@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tbcload - Tcl bytecode loader https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213595 wart at kobold.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |213596 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 2 06:20:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2006 01:20:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213594] Review Request: eclipse-phpeclipse In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611020620.kA26KQmQ014300@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-phpeclipse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213594 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at theholbrooks.org 2006-11-02 01:20 EST ------- I mistyped the original ticket number in comment 0: the original really was Bug 203205 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 2 06:27:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2006 01:27:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213511] Review Request: gxine - Gnome frontend for the xine multimedia library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611020627.kA26RRWZ014509@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gxine - Gnome frontend for the xine multimedia library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213511 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |panemade at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-11-02 01:27 EST ------- rpmlint is not silent on SRPM W: kaffeine mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 25, tab: line 16) The specfile mixes use of spaces and tabs for indentation, which is a cosmetic annoyance. Use either spaces or tabs for indentation, not both. W: kaffeine patch-not-applied Patch1: kaffeine-0.8.2-codecs.patch A patch is included in your package but was not applied. Refer to the patches documentation to see what's wrong. rpmlint is not silent on RPM E: kaffeine script-without-shebang /usr/share/doc/kaffeine-0.8.2/ChangeLog This text file has executable bits set or is located in a path dedicated for executables, but lacks a shebang and cannot thus be executed. If the file is meant to be an executable script, add the shebang, otherwise remove the executable bits or move the file elsewhere. E: kaffeine script-without-shebang /usr/share/doc/kaffeine-0.8.2/TODO This text file has executable bits set or is located in a path dedicated for executables, but lacks a shebang and cannot thus be executed. If the file is meant to be an executable script, add the shebang, otherwise remove the executable bits or move the file elsewhere. W: kaffeine dangling-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/kaffeine/common /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/common The symbolic link points nowhere. W: kaffeine symlink-should-be-relative /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/kaffeine/common /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/common Absolute symlinks are problematic eg. when working with chroot environments. E: kaffeine script-without-shebang /usr/share/doc/kaffeine-0.8.2/AUTHORS This text file has executable bits set or is located in a path dedicated for executables, but lacks a shebang and cannot thus be executed. If the file is meant to be an executable script, add the shebang, otherwise remove the executable bits or move the file elsewhere. /tmp/kaffeine-0.8.2-3.i386.rpm.26889/usr/share/applications/kde/kaffeine.desktop: warning: file contains key "DocPath", this key is currently reserved for use within KDE, and should in the future KDE releases be prefixed by "X-" Solve these errors and resubmit new package. I hope all rpmlint warnings and errros are self explanatory here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 2 06:31:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2006 01:31:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213432] Review Request: kaffeine - Xine-based media player In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611020631.kA26V2Kd014670@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kaffeine - Xine-based media player https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213432 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |panemade at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-11-02 01:30 EST ------- rpmlint is not silent on SRPM W: kaffeine mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 25, tab: line 16) The specfile mixes use of spaces and tabs for indentation, which is a cosmetic annoyance. Use either spaces or tabs for indentation, not both. W: kaffeine patch-not-applied Patch1: kaffeine-0.8.2-codecs.patch A patch is included in your package but was not applied. Refer to the patches documentation to see what's wrong. rpmlint is not silent on RPM E: kaffeine script-without-shebang /usr/share/doc/kaffeine-0.8.2/ChangeLog This text file has executable bits set or is located in a path dedicated for executables, but lacks a shebang and cannot thus be executed. If the file is meant to be an executable script, add the shebang, otherwise remove the executable bits or move the file elsewhere. E: kaffeine script-without-shebang /usr/share/doc/kaffeine-0.8.2/TODO This text file has executable bits set or is located in a path dedicated for executables, but lacks a shebang and cannot thus be executed. If the file is meant to be an executable script, add the shebang, otherwise remove the executable bits or move the file elsewhere. W: kaffeine dangling-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/kaffeine/common /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/common The symbolic link points nowhere. W: kaffeine symlink-should-be-relative /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/kaffeine/common /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/common Absolute symlinks are problematic eg. when working with chroot environments. E: kaffeine script-without-shebang /usr/share/doc/kaffeine-0.8.2/AUTHORS This text file has executable bits set or is located in a path dedicated for executables, but lacks a shebang and cannot thus be executed. If the file is meant to be an executable script, add the shebang, otherwise remove the executable bits or move the file elsewhere. /tmp/kaffeine-0.8.2-3.i386.rpm.26889/usr/share/applications/kde/kaffeine.desktop: warning: file contains key "DocPath", this key is currently reserved for use within KDE, and should in the future KDE releases be prefixed by "X-" Solve these errors and resubmit new package. I hope all rpmlint warnings and errros are self explanatory here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 2 06:31:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2006 01:31:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213511] Review Request: gxine - Gnome frontend for the xine multimedia library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611020631.kA26VYL5014714@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gxine - Gnome frontend for the xine multimedia library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213511 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-11-02 01:31 EST ------- oops, Sorry Mola i replied to wrong BUG Actually i had opened both new xine review requests and took first kaffine and checked that package and wrongly replied here without seeing bug number. sorry again -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 2 07:51:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2006 02:51:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213600] New: Review Request: tinyca2 - Simple graphical userinterface to manage a small CA Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213600 Summary: Review Request: tinyca2 - Simple graphical userinterface to manage a small CA Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: enrico.scholz at informatik.tu-chemnitz.de QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://ensc.de/fedora/tinyca2 SRPM URL: http://ensc.de/fedora/tinyca2 Description: TinyCA is a simple graphical userinterface written in Perl/Gtk to manage a small CA (Certification Authority). TinyCA works as a frontend for openssl Currently TinyCA supports the following features: * Unlimited CAs possible * Support for creating and managing SubCAs * Creation and Revocation of x509 - S/MIME certificates * PKCS#10 Requests can be imported and signed * RSA and DSA keys can be generated and used * ServerCertificates o Certificates can be exported as: PEM, DER, TXT and PKCS#12 o Certificates may be used with e.g. Apache, Postfix, OpenLDAP, Cyrus, FreeS/WAN, OpenVPN, OpenSWAN, FreeRadius * ClientCertificates o Certificates can be exported as: PEM, DER, TXT and PKCS#12 o Certificates may be used with e.g. Netscape, Konqueror, Opera, Internet Explorer, Outlook (Express) and FreeS/WAN * Certificate Revocation List o CRLs can be exported as: PEM, DER and TXT -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 2 08:46:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2006 03:46:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213511] Review Request: gxine - Gnome frontend for the xine multimedia library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611020846.kA28kPY1020969@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gxine - Gnome frontend for the xine multimedia library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213511 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-11-02 03:46 EST ------- heres review for your package. Got same results for rpmlint on RPM and SRPM as Michel got. use %find_lang gxine and remove .mo listings under %files Then i installed on my FC6 T3 machine and got errors what may i missings? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 2 08:58:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2006 03:58:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213511] Review Request: gxine - Gnome frontend for the xine multimedia library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611020858.kA28wDPo022099@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gxine - Gnome frontend for the xine multimedia library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213511 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-11-02 03:58 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=140095) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=140095&action=view) errors i got which i used gxine -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 2 10:39:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2006 05:39:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 209259] Review Request: beryl-core - Beryl OpenGL window and compositing manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611021039.kA2Adt0P030787@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: beryl-core - Beryl OpenGL window and compositing manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209259 cgoorah at yahoo.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |cgoorah at yahoo.com.au ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2006-11-02 05:39 EST ------- Is it possible to go with this ? Requires: gnome-desktop, control-center If not, one who has install kde only will have to install all those dependencies of the gnome-desktop. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 2 11:16:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2006 06:16:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 211626] Review Request: xtide - Calculate tide all over the world In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611021116.kA2BGNRl002860@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xtide - Calculate tide all over the world https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211626 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-11-02 06:16 EST ------- I mailed to upstream. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 2 11:18:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2006 06:18:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 212704] Review Request: manedit - UNIX Manual Page Editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611021118.kA2BIQnG002963@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: manedit - UNIX Manual Page Editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212704 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-11-02 06:18 EST ------- For apostrophe issue (I don't know if this is a bug of manedit or gtk+) and gtk2ization, I mailed to perhaps-upstream. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 2 11:22:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2006 06:22:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 212704] Review Request: manedit - UNIX Manual Page Editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611021122.kA2BMAMl003246@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: manedit - UNIX Manual Page Editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212704 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-11-02 06:21 EST ------- In my opinion, the apostrophe issue is also an utf8 issue, the apostrophe used isn't the ascii apostrophe but an utf8 encoded apostrophe (which is believed to be better looking). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 2 11:30:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2006 06:30:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213594] Review Request: eclipse-phpeclipse In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611021130.kA2BULiA004134@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-phpeclipse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213594 ------- Additional Comments From green at redhat.com 2006-11-02 06:30 EST ------- Brandon: I don't think it's OK to add your own license file to %doc, even if it is the appropriate one. I believe this rule is.... MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. I tried this once with vkeybd and see where it got me... https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189889 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 2 11:33:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2006 06:33:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 212704] Review Request: manedit - UNIX Manual Page Editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611021133.kA2BXS6K004350@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: manedit - UNIX Manual Page Editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212704 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-11-02 06:33 EST ------- Well, perhaps the current way is * wait for upstream's response (I think upstream is learfox[at]twu.net according to http://wolfpack.twu.net/contacts.html .....) * or add some comments like "this is gtk+ package and some (especially UTF-8) characters will appear as garbages") , perhaps. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 2 11:56:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2006 06:56:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 212704] Review Request: manedit - UNIX Manual Page Editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611021156.kA2BurYn006392@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: manedit - UNIX Manual Page Editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212704 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-11-02 06:56 EST ------- I think upstream must be contacted about that issue, but I don't think we should wait for this issue to be solved before accepting manedit in fedora extras. the comment in %description seems enough to me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 2 12:53:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2006 07:53:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 207265] Review Request: python-zope-interface - Zope interfaces package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611021253.kA2Crtww011968@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-zope-interface - Zope interfaces package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207265 paul at city-fan.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-11-02 07:53 EST ------- Imported and built successfully for FC-5, FC-6, and development. owners.list updated. Thanks for the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 2 12:54:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2006 07:54:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 208169] Review Request: python-twisted-core - An asynchronous networking framework written in Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611021254.kA2CsrdV012109@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-twisted-core - An asynchronous networking framework written in Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208169 Bug 208169 depends on bug 207265, which changed state. Bug 207265 Summary: Review Request: python-zope-interface - Zope interfaces package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207265 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 2 13:34:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2006 08:34:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 196837] Review Request: php-pear-PHPUnit3 - PEAR: Regression testing framework for unit tests In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611021334.kA2DYxXo015124@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-PHPUnit3 - PEAR: Regression testing framework for unit tests Alias: pear-PHPUnit3 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196837 ------- Additional Comments From Fedora at FamilleCollet.com 2006-11-02 08:34 EST ------- > Could we install the channel in a %pre section in this package instead? I think this will not help you to build on mock. You prabably have to propose a packaging rules for this "channel" package on fedora-packaging at redhat.com. > BTW, Remi, would you like to be co-maintainer with me on this package? "co-maintainer" is a little bit confusing for me with the actual fedora system, but i agree to work with you on this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 2 13:39:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2006 08:39:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213432] Review Request: kaffeine - Xine-based media player In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611021339.kA2DdsTj015751@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kaffeine - Xine-based media player https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213432 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-11-02 08:39 EST ------- Spec URL: http://kde-redhat.unl.edu/apt/kde-redhat/SPECS/kaffeine.spec SRPM URL: http://kde-redhat.unl.edu/apt/kde-redhat/all/SRPMS.stable/kaffeine-0.8.2-3.src.rpm %changelog * Thu Nov 02 2006 Rex Dieter 0.8.2-4 - chmod -x AUTHORS ChangeLog TODO - use rel symlinks under %%_docdir All the other rpmlint verbosity is harmless. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 2 14:18:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2006 09:18:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213657] New: Review Request: openib - Upstream OFED package to support InfiniBand hardware Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213657 Summary: Review Request: openib - Upstream OFED package to support InfiniBand hardware Product: Fedora Core Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: dledford at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com The openib package is already in CVS and used in RHEL4 and RHEL5. I would like to add it to Fedora Core Development (aka rawhide) and possibly to Fedora Core 6 as an update. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 2 14:20:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2006 09:20:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213658] New: Review Request: ibutils - Upstream OFED package to support InfiniBand hardware Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213658 Summary: Review Request: ibutils - Upstream OFED package to support InfiniBand hardware Product: Fedora Core Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: dledford at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com The ibutils package is a collection of InfiniBand fabrid diagnostic tools. It depends on the openib package. The ibutils and openib packages are already in CVS and used in RHEL4 and RHEL5. I would like to add it to Fedora Core Development (aka rawhide) and possibly to Fedora Core 6 as an update. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 2 14:22:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2006 09:22:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213662] New: Review Request: openmpi - Upstream MPI package with native InfiniBand support Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213662 Summary: Review Request: openmpi - Upstream MPI package with native InfiniBand support Product: Fedora Core Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: dledford at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com The openmpi package is the intended replacement for the aging and deprecated by upstream lam package. It depends on the openib package. The openmpi and openib packages are already in CVS and used in RHEL4 and RHEL5. The openmpi package is already accepted into Fedora Extras. However, that presents a problem for packages like Valgrind that would like to compile against it and are in core. I would like to add openmpi to Fedora Core Development (aka rawhide) and possibly to Fedora Core 6 as an update. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 2 14:26:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2006 09:26:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 212704] Review Request: manedit - UNIX Manual Page Editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611021426.kA2EQil6020787@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: manedit - UNIX Manual Page Editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212704 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-11-02 09:26 EST ------- Okay, I added about some comments in %%description stage. http://www.ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~mtasaka/dist/extras/development/SPECS/manedit.spec http://www.ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~mtasaka/dist/extras/development/SRPMS/manedit-0.7.1-4.src.rpm As I commented about, I mailed upstream about gtk2ization. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 2 15:06:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2006 10:06:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213594] Review Request: eclipse-phpeclipse In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611021506.kA2F6pha025013@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-phpeclipse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213594 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at theholbrooks.org 2006-11-02 10:06 EST ------- Wow that's funny, because all of mine and others' (that I know of) PEAR/PECL packages manually include a copy of the PHP license. The tarball DOES contain an .html version of the license, but I thought an ASCII version would be more portable so I manually included it. If you like, I can just stick the .html in %doc and remove the .txt file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 2 15:15:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2006 10:15:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213594] Review Request: eclipse-phpeclipse In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611021515.kA2FFZao025930@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-phpeclipse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213594 green at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |green at redhat.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From green at redhat.com 2006-11-02 10:15 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > The tarball DOES contain an .html version of the license, but I thought an ASCII > version would be more portable so I manually included it. If you like, I can > just stick the .html in %doc and remove the .txt file. I think that would be best. I'll do a review of your next SRPM. AG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 2 16:09:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2006 11:09:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 209260] Review Request: beryl-manager - Beryl window decorator and theme management utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611021609.kA2G9NS0031648@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: beryl-manager - Beryl window decorator and theme management utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209260 tjb at unh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tjb at unh.edu ------- Additional Comments From tjb at unh.edu 2006-11-02 11:09 EST ------- >From the current repo version, using beryl-manager to switch to compiz fails for me. Could be a gnome-window-decorator bug since it seems the --replace switch is not replacing emerald. Selecting compiz with COW breaks compiz such that it won't actually work again until you reset the /apps/compiz/general/allscreens/options/active_plugins key to default values. I've had these two problems on both intel and nvidia hardware. I'm not sure if these are upstream bugs or FC6 specific ones. Unfortunately for me, beryl on my dual head nvidia box also seems to make many windows just black (firefox particularly). One reason for me to use it is for better xinerama support. I don't see this black window problem on my single head nvidia box or my intel laptop. Is there a place to talk about problems with these rpms on FC6? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 2 16:12:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2006 11:12:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213511] Review Request: gxine - Gnome frontend for the xine multimedia library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611021612.kA2GCESU032022@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gxine - Gnome frontend for the xine multimedia library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213511 ------- Additional Comments From michel.salim at gmail.com 2006-11-02 11:12 EST ------- Uh, Parag, it looks from your desktop integration errors that you're running gxine as the *root* user? Those are just because the directories you were writing to did not exist. I do get the 'xine-lib: error: The xine engine failed to start.: No demuxer found - stream format not recognized.' errors as well. They keep appearing on stderr, together with a dialog box saying the same thing, until I kill gxine. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 2 16:15:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2006 11:15:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213511] Review Request: gxine - Gnome frontend for the xine multimedia library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611021615.kA2GFLoM032264@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gxine - Gnome frontend for the xine multimedia library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213511 ------- Additional Comments From michel.salim at gmail.com 2006-11-02 11:15 EST ------- Also, from the INSTALL file provided by gxine, it looks like you might want to BuildReq on several other optional packages: libxext-dev (for DPMS, presumably so gxine can stop your screen from blanking during playback), Xinerama, etc. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 2 17:04:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2006 12:04:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 209262] Review Request: beryl-plugins - Beryl OpenGL window and compositing manager plug-ins In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611021704.kA2H4lx3005269@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: beryl-plugins - Beryl OpenGL window and compositing manager plug-ins https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209262 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2006-11-02 12:04 EST ------- This is a RFE: chitlesh(~)[0]$rpm -qf /usr/share/beryl/cubecaps.png beryl-plugins-0.1.1-2.fc6 from your repo. could you remplace that file with /usr/share/rhgb/main-logo.png ? It's more fedora this way :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 2 17:06:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2006 12:06:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 211548] Review Request: fluxstyle - Graphical style manager for fluxbox In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611021706.kA2H6iap005385@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fluxstyle - Graphical style manager for fluxbox https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211548 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-11-02 12:06 EST ------- It doesn't seems to be in built in devel? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 2 17:26:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2006 12:26:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 212894] Review Request: libopm - Blitzed open proxy monitor library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611021726.kA2HQGWj007629@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libopm - Blitzed open proxy monitor library Alias: libopm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212894 ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2006-11-02 12:26 EST ------- -For the RPM_OPT_FLAGS, I did not check the actual flags being used. I simply noted it because I did not see it explicitly mentioned in the spec file. I will take a closer look at this issue when I do the formal review. You can leave it out for now if you think it's not needed. - I suggested you use %defattr(-,root,root,-) because all of the examples given use this. It probably doesn't matter much and I wont block the review because of it, but I don't see any harm in adding it either. See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines?highlight=%28defattr%29 - The group doesn't matter to me, I can't find anything anywhere defining the groups so you can leave it as is if you like. - I suggested you use --disable-static because of this: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-2302ec1e1f44202c9cc4bcce24cb711266557ad7 Which states that static libraries should be disable whenever possible. So unless you got a *really* good reason to keep the static library, then I will allow you to keep it in the package, but you must add a comment in the spec file explaining the *really* good reason for you to keep it. Otherwise this is a blocker and the static library must be removed before I can approve it. - For the version number, I suggested 0.0.0 because this was the version number use in the .so filename. However, if you want to use 0.1, that is fine too. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 2 17:33:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2006 12:33:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 212692] New package: libgnomekbd In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611021733.kA2HXAjQ008355@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: New package: libgnomekbd https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212692 ------- Additional Comments From rstrode at redhat.com 2006-11-02 12:33 EST ------- the description has %{name} in it, that's weird -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 2 17:34:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2006 12:34:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 212692] New package: libgnomekbd In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611021734.kA2HYZPe008481@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: New package: libgnomekbd https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212692 rstrode at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |rstrode at redhat.com OtherBugsDependingO|188265 |188267 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 2 17:35:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2006 12:35:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 212692] New package: libgnomekbd In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611021735.kA2HZYvP008634@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: New package: libgnomekbd https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212692 ------- Additional Comments From rstrode at redhat.com 2006-11-02 12:35 EST ------- I think we have a policy of putting a full URL in the Source line -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 2 17:41:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2006 12:41:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 212692] New package: libgnomekbd In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611021741.kA2HfaNl009652@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: New package: libgnomekbd https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212692 ------- Additional Comments From rstrode at redhat.com 2006-11-02 12:41 EST ------- It says it requires dbus-glib >= 0.34. Is that really right? isn't it at version .7something now? why does this *library* ship a capplet? What does it do? Can we just nuke it and not put it in the package? Also what is the output of rpmlint? any warnings or errors? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 2 17:53:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2006 12:53:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 212692] New package: libgnomekbd In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611021753.kA2HrgHp010978@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: New package: libgnomekbd https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212692 ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2006-11-02 12:53 EST ------- I don't have a source url, unless you want me to put in the sourceforce download url. Its not in gnome ftp yet. Regarding dbus-glib version, I just copied whatever versions the configure script requires. But if it freaks you out' I'll bump it. The capplet is for configuring the plugins. I know it is slightly ridiculous, thats why I have made it NoDisplay. I was not totally sure about leaving it out. On the one hand, having plugins in a keyboard indicator is nonsense, and we don't ship any in core anyway, but on the other hand there are many flag lovers out there who would maybe install the flags plugin if it was packaged in extras. I guess whoever decides to package the plugins could also package the capplet in extras then. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 2 17:57:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2006 12:57:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 212692] New package: libgnomekbd In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611021757.kA2HvYdw011444@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: New package: libgnomekbd https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212692 ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2006-11-02 12:57 EST ------- Also, aren't reviewers supposed to run rpmlint themselves ? Anyway, it comes up clean -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 2 18:01:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2006 13:01:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 212692] New package: libgnomekbd In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611021801.kA2I1Axq011873@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: New package: libgnomekbd https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212692 rstrode at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|188267 |188268 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From rstrode at redhat.com 2006-11-02 13:00 EST ------- Okay moving to FC-ACCEPT. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 2 18:06:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2006 13:06:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 199405] Review Request: vtk - The Visualization Toolkit - A high level 3D visualization library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611021806.kA2I6mL9012606@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vtk - The Visualization Toolkit - A high level 3D visualization library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199405 Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #139933|0 |1 is obsolete| | ------- Additional Comments From Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net 2006-11-02 13:06 EST ------- (From update of attachment 139933) OK, I marked the patch in comment #27 as obsolete. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 2 18:10:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2006 13:10:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 201000] Review Request: libFoundation - A free implementation of OpenStep's Foundation Kit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611021810.kA2IASSU013160@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libFoundation - A free implementation of OpenStep's Foundation Kit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201000 Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net 2006-11-02 13:10 EST ------- Builds for FC-5 have been just queued, closing as NEXTRELEASE. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 2 18:21:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2006 13:21:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213511] Review Request: gxine - Gnome frontend for the xine multimedia library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611021821.kA2ILavd014215@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gxine - Gnome frontend for the xine multimedia library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213511 ------- Additional Comments From michel.salim at gmail.com 2006-11-02 13:21 EST ------- So, the error is because the /usr/share/gxine/logo.mpv file that gxine tries to open on startup .. cannot be played without the nonfree codecs. Problem goes away after installing xine-lib-extras-nonfree from Livna, which is not a viable solution for an Extras package. You might want to ask Upstream if they could change the format used for the logo file. Or alternatively, patch gxine not to load the file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 2 18:24:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2006 13:24:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213511] Review Request: gxine - Gnome frontend for the xine multimedia library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611021824.kA2IOWuc014416@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gxine - Gnome frontend for the xine multimedia library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213511 michel.salim at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |michel.salim at gmail.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |188267 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 2 18:43:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2006 13:43:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 209311] Review Request: espeak - Software speech synthesizer (text-to-speech) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611021843.kA2Ihw3P016377@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: espeak - Software speech synthesizer (text-to-speech) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209311 ------- Additional Comments From faucamp at csir.co.za 2006-11-02 13:43 EST ------- Thanks for the feedback! New build: Spec URL: http://dialogpalette.sourceforge.net/extras/fedora/espeak.spec SRPM URL: http://dialogpalette.sourceforge.net/extras/fedora/espeak-1.16-2.src.rpm Changes: - Added "install" target to makefile (makefile_install_target.patch) - Added patch to fix AMD64 sizeof(char *) assumption bug (upstream request ID 1588938) - Changed "portaudio" BuildRequires to "portaudio-devel" - Added patch to makefile to allow RPM_OPT_FLAGS - Added patch to replace all references to "speak" binary with "espeak" - Moved header files to /usr/include/espeak A few comments: Development headers: As mentioned in the ReadMe, the speak_lib.h provides the entire API to the libespeak shared library, and it references no other espeak-specific headers, so it is unecessary to include any other .h files. Binary voice data: The espeak program itself (formerly "speak" ;-) ) cannot compile the binary voice data (using the --compile arg) from source without a binary version of the phoneme tables being present. These phoneme table data files cannot be compiled from source using espeak/speak; they are compiled with a seperate program, "espeakedit", which is an interactive, GUI-based editing tool, also released under the GPL. There is no explicit license file for the binary voice data/phoneme tables, but since the source from which these are compiled is under the GPL, I don't think there are any legal problems. Patches: Depending on the feedback from this package build, I will push the makefile patches upstream (except for the RPM_OPT_FLAGS patch). espeak name: I agree that the "speak" name is troublesome, and have removed it from this rpm, as per suggestion. However, we must remember that some other applications may already be using eSpeak via the "speak" executable (especially since the shared library is a relatively new addition to espeak); this patch may break compatability with such programs. Some HOWTO's and guides on the Internet will also be (very slightly) incompatible with this naming scheme. There are ways around this, naturally, but I'm uncertain whether changing the name in the Fedora package is the best course of action. Nevertheless, depending on the feedback here, I will push upstream for the name change... :-) I've built this package in mock on FC6/i386. rpmlint is silent, except for the no-documentation stuff for the -devel subpackage. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 2 18:48:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2006 13:48:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 196393] Review Request: svrcore-devel In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611021848.kA2ImiVd016810@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: svrcore-devel Alias: svrcore-devel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196393 ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2006-11-02 13:48 EST ------- "we hope to have other apps use it in the future" should be a motivator to do it right (shared libraries). I'm not seeing a valid reason to permit static libraries here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 2 19:06:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2006 14:06:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213511] Review Request: gxine - Gnome frontend for the xine multimedia library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611021906.kA2J6X1k018288@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gxine - Gnome frontend for the xine multimedia library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213511 michel.salim at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|188267 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From michel.salim at gmail.com 2006-11-02 14:06 EST ------- Accidentally moved it to the wrong bug tracker -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 2 19:22:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2006 14:22:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 212692] New package: libgnomekbd In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611021922.kA2JM5Ug019535@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: New package: libgnomekbd https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212692 ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-11-02 14:22 EST ------- Package added to dist-fc7, please close bug when built for rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 2 19:25:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2006 14:25:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 212894] Review Request: libopm - Blitzed open proxy monitor library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611021925.kA2JP9eb019841@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libopm - Blitzed open proxy monitor library Alias: libopm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212894 ------- Additional Comments From redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de 2006-11-02 14:25 EST ------- Okay, hopefully fixed everything; new: Spec URL: http://labs.linuxnetz.de/bugzilla/libopm.spec SRPM URL: http://labs.linuxnetz.de/bugzilla/libopm-0.1-3.20050731cvs.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 2 20:37:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2006 15:37:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213662] Review Request: openmpi - Upstream MPI package with native InfiniBand support In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611022037.kA2KbfaE025988@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: openmpi - Upstream MPI package with native InfiniBand support https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213662 dledford at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |203299 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 2 20:51:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2006 15:51:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 197867] Review Request: iscsitarget (includes kernel module) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611022051.kA2KpipO027550@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: iscsitarget (includes kernel module) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197867 dennis at ausil.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dennis at ausil.us ------- Additional Comments From dennis at ausil.us 2006-11-02 15:51 EST ------- whats the current status of this package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 2 21:20:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2006 16:20:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 196393] Review Request: svrcore-devel In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611022120.kA2LKwnh029904@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: svrcore-devel Alias: svrcore-devel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196393 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-11-02 16:20 EST ------- When upstream ships only static libs it is not a blocker not to have shared libs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 2 21:23:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2006 16:23:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213595] Review Request: tbcload - Tcl bytecode loader In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611022123.kA2LNDhU030091@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tbcload - Tcl bytecode loader https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213595 ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2006-11-02 16:23 EST ------- Added the missing license file: http://www.kobold.org/~wart/fedora/tbcload.spec http://www.kobold.org/~wart/fedora/tbcload-1.4-2.20061030cvs.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 2 21:23:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2006 16:23:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213596] Review Request: tclcompiler - Tcl bytecode compiler In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611022123.kA2LNueG030276@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tclcompiler - Tcl bytecode compiler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213596 ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2006-11-02 16:23 EST ------- Added missing license file: http://www.kobold.org/~wart/fedora/tclcompiler.spec http://www.kobold.org/~wart/fedora/tclcompiler-1.5-2.20061030cvs.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 2 21:30:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2006 16:30:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 196393] Review Request: svrcore-devel In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611022130.kA2LUBTa030865@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: svrcore-devel Alias: svrcore-devel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196393 ------- Additional Comments From rmeggins at redhat.com 2006-11-02 16:29 EST ------- (In reply to comment #18) > When upstream ships only static libs it is not a blocker not to > have shared libs. Plus, it's only a -devel package, not a runtime package (or perhaps that's redundant). On the other hand, we (the Fedora DS team) are the upstream for svrcore-devel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 2 21:32:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2006 16:32:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 211703] Review Request: nyquist - Sound synthesis and composition language with a Lisp syntax In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611022132.kA2LWYWl031108@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nyquist - Sound synthesis and composition language with a Lisp syntax https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211703 ------- Additional Comments From gemi at bluewin.ch 2006-11-02 16:32 EST ------- Here is the package which includes the fix (spec at the same place): http://math.ifi.unizh.ch/fedora/6/i386/SRPMS.gemi/nyquist-2.31-3.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 2 21:39:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2006 16:39:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213180] Review Request: tcl-thread - Thread extension for Tcl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611022139.kA2LdK8l032009@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tcl-thread - Thread extension for Tcl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213180 wart at kobold.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |wart at kobold.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 2 21:46:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2006 16:46:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213765] New: Review Request: alex4 - Alex the Allegator 4 - Platform game Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213765 Summary: Review Request: alex4 - Alex the Allegator 4 - Platform game Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/alex4.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/alex4-1.0-1.src.rpm Description: In the latest installment of the series Alex travels through the jungle in search of his kidnapped girlfriend. Plenty of classic platforming in four nice colors guaranteed! --- Hmm I just realised this needs work to work properly on PPC (I had to fix some file loading issues on x86_64, but there are endian issues in there too I realise now). I'll report back here with an updated version for PPC soon. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 2 21:58:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2006 16:58:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 199029] Review Request: jokosher In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611022158.kA2LwJcX001735@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jokosher https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199029 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-11-02 16:58 EST ------- Has there been anymore progress on this package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 2 21:58:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2006 16:58:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 184011] Review Request: nickle In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611022158.kA2Lw9Fh001719@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nickle https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=184011 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|fedora-extras- |fedora-package- |list at redhat.com |review at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From gemi at bluewin.ch 2006-11-02 16:58 EST ------- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 2 22:05:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2006 17:05:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 204700] Review Request: njb-sharp - C# bindings to libnjb In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611022205.kA2M5Zr5002429@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: njb-sharp - C# bindings to libnjb https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204700 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-11-02 17:05 EST ------- Anything happening on this package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 2 22:05:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2006 17:05:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 199029] Review Request: jokosher In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611022205.kA2M5ead002450@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jokosher https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199029 ------- Additional Comments From snecklifter at gmail.com 2006-11-02 17:05 EST ------- Brian Pepple (above) has agreed to take ownership of this and I imagine he is waiting on the 0.2 release... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 2 22:06:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2006 17:06:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213765] Review Request: alex4 - Alex the Allegator 4 - Platform game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611022206.kA2M6viw002553@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: alex4 - Alex the Allegator 4 - Platform game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213765 paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 2 22:08:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2006 17:08:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 199029] Review Request: jokosher In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611022208.kA2M8FND002662@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jokosher https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199029 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-11-02 17:08 EST ------- I think you'll find that was for gnonlin - or at least that's how I read it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 2 22:12:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2006 17:12:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 212836] Review Request: fwfstab - a graphical file system table (fstab) editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611022212.kA2MCgog003044@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fwfstab - a graphical file system table (fstab) editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212836 ------- Additional Comments From s.adam at diffingo.com 2006-11-02 17:12 EST ------- Sorry for the troubles - I edited the 'add' function but not the 'edit' one... I tested both on my machine, it should work as it should now. Your right it is, but considering I have 0 downloads (apart from here) I just re-created the tarball... Anyways, I made a new release: SPEC: http://www.diffingo.com/downloads/fwfstab/fwfstab.spec SRPM: http://www.diffingo.com/downloads/fwfstab/fwfstab-0.01.1-1.src.rpm RPM: http://www.diffingo.com/downloads/fwfstab/fwfstab-0.01.1-1.noarch.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 2 22:15:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2006 17:15:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 206877] Review Request: bzr-gtk - Bazaar plugin for GTK+ interfaces to most Bazaar operations In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611022215.kA2MFK4g003207@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bzr-gtk - Bazaar plugin for GTK+ interfaces to most Bazaar operations https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206877 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-11-02 17:15 EST ------- Could you please close this bug if it has been imported? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 2 22:21:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2006 17:21:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 211728] Review Request: stklos - Scheme Interpreter/Compiler System In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611022221.kA2ML1gL003624@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: stklos - Scheme Interpreter/Compiler System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211728 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-11-02 17:20 EST ------- rpmlint warnings SRPM : clean RPM : you have multiple files in the main rpm which should be in the -devel package DEBUGINFO : clean You need to create a -devel package for this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 2 22:25:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2006 17:25:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213180] Review Request: tcl-thread - Thread extension for Tcl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611022225.kA2MPNcQ003979@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tcl-thread - Thread extension for Tcl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213180 ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2006-11-02 17:25 EST ------- This does not build properly on x86_64 in mock. It seems that the configure script is written to only look for libgdbm.so in /usr/lib, not /usr/lib64. You might try adding '--with-gdbm=%{_libdir}' to %configure, or modifying the configure script to look for the library in ${libdir}. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 2 22:31:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2006 17:31:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213765] Review Request: alex4 - Alex the Allegator 4 - Platform game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611022231.kA2MVoX4004402@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: alex4 - Alex the Allegator 4 - Platform game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213765 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-11-02 17:31 EST ------- Two quickies. 1. why no _smp_mflags on the make? If it's down to a race condition, can you comment it please 2. --add-category X-Fedora is causing problems for me big style on rawhide. if you enclose it with a conditional that the branch of fedora is < "7", then I'm happy rpmlint is quiet, so that's good :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 2 22:39:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2006 17:39:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 212079] Review Request: freefont - Free UCS Outline Fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611022239.kA2MdJ3o005252@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: freefont - Free UCS Outline Fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212079 orion at cora.nwra.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From orion at cora.nwra.com 2006-11-02 17:39 EST ------- Checked in and built for devel. Added to owners.list. FC5 and FC6 branches requested. Thanks for the review! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 2 22:45:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2006 17:45:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 211729] Review Request: museek+ - Soulseek network filesharing client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611022245.kA2MjxVM006470@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: museek+ - Soulseek network filesharing client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211729 belegdol at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|devel |fc6 ------- Additional Comments From belegdol at gmail.com 2006-11-02 17:45 EST ------- I have updated the SPEC to comply with the Packaging Guidelines (or I think I have). SPEC URL: http://www.republika.pl/belegdol/temp/museek+.spec SRPM URL: http://www.republika.pl/belegdol/temp/museek+-0.1.12-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 2 22:47:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2006 17:47:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213180] Review Request: tcl-thread - Thread extension for Tcl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611022247.kA2MlF73006608@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tcl-thread - Thread extension for Tcl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213180 ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2006-11-02 17:47 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=140195) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=140195&action=view) Look for gdbm library in %{_libdir} This patch modifies the configure script to properly look for the gdbm library in $libdir, instead of only looking in /usr/lib. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 2 22:52:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2006 17:52:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 211703] Review Request: nyquist - Sound synthesis and composition language with a Lisp syntax In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611022252.kA2MquKi007205@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nyquist - Sound synthesis and composition language with a Lisp syntax https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211703 ------- Additional Comments From gemi at bluewin.ch 2006-11-02 17:52 EST ------- Oops, it should be: http://math.ifi.unizh.ch/fedora/6/i386/SRPMS.gemi/nyquist-2.31-3.fc6.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 2 22:54:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2006 17:54:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213600] Review Request: tinyca2 - Simple graphical userinterface to manage a small CA In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611022254.kA2MsmJk007306@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tinyca2 - Simple graphical userinterface to manage a small CA https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213600 ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2006-11-02 17:54 EST ------- Not an official review since I am just a rookie. - rpmlint gives one warning on the src: tinyca2 mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs. A quick glance makes me think that the indentation used in the %description and for the sed lines (in %setup) might be the culprit - the buildroot line does not respect the preferred value for FE (%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)). Since this is just a PREFERRED not a MUST, should not be a blocker - MUST: package is named according to the guidelines - MUST: spec file name matches the base package name - MUST: license field matches actual license - MUST: the program is licensed under GPL but upstream did not include the actual text of the license is the source, just the reference to it. I guess you should ping upstream to add the license to the provided tar files. - MUST: spec file is in American English - MUST: spec file is legible - MUST: source matches upstream, md5sum being a7f63806dbdc38a34ed58e42e79f4822 for both - MUST: builds fine in mock/i386. Since the content is actually just a perl script + some message (.po) files which are formatted during the build phase, I assume it would succesfully build on any platform; created rpm is noarch - MUST: %find_lang macro is correctly used to pick locales - MUST: no libraries are installed, so there is no need for calling ldconfig in %post/%postun - MUST: package is not relocatable - MUST: owns all directories (and files) that it creates - MUST: no duplicate files in the %files listing - MUST: %clean is correct - MUST: makes consistent use of macros - MUST: no forbidden code/content included - MUST: large documentation does not exist, so no need for a separate -doc - MUST: the content of %doc is a small CHANGES file, so runtime functionality is not affected - MUST: no header or static files, no pkgconfig(.pc), no library files with a suffix, no ibtool archives, so no need for -devel - MUST: IS a GUI application; correctly includes %{name}.desktop (provided by upstream) and properly installs it with desktop-file-install; someone more experienced please comment if the "--add-category=X-Fedora" is still required (according to yesterday's FESCO: === Packaging Committee Report === * Voting to stop using the X-Fedora category in the desktop file is currently underway via email.) - MUST: does not take ownership of foreign files/directories - SHOULD: includes available translations - SHOULD: as specified above, builds fine in mock - SHOULD: on a RHEL4 system the rpm installed fine but the program did not run, failing with: error: Failed dependencies: perl(Gtk2) is needed by tinyca2-0.7.5-2.noarch perl(Gtk2::SimpleMenu) is needed by tinyca2-0.7.5-2.noarch perl(Locale::gettext) is needed by tinyca2-0.7.5-2.noarch On FC6 it detected the missing Requires, but failed to get installed even after installing perl-Gtk2 and gettext: error: Failed dependencies: perl(Locale::gettext) is needed by tinyca2-0.7.5-2.noarch It seems that the correct Requires should be perl-gettext rather then gettext. The program runs successfully after installing perl-Gtk2 and perl-gettext. - SHOULD: no scriplets at all, so neither unsane scriptlets Bottom line - cosmetic fixes: make rpmlint happy by replacing multiple spaces with tab (non blocker) - make reviewers happy by using the recommended build root line (non blocker) - use a correct Requires line (perl-gettext instead of gettext) (BLOCKER) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 2 23:04:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2006 18:04:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213180] Review Request: tcl-thread - Thread extension for Tcl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611022304.kA2N4wcJ007889@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tcl-thread - Thread extension for Tcl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213180 ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2006-11-02 18:04 EST ------- GOOD ==== * Package and spec named appropriately: The upstream name is the simply 'thread', which is far too generic. Following the examples for python and perl modules, the name tcl-thread is acceptable. * Spec file is legible and in Am. English * Source matches upstream: 3c69b4a891590f23bb79a1fa98d879f7 thread2.6.5.tar.gz * No unnecessary BuildRequires * No locales * No shared libraries in the default linker path; the shared library that is produced is loaded by Tcl via dlopen. * RPM_BUILD_ROOT cleaned where appropriate * Not relocatable * No duplicate %files * File permissions look ok * No need for a -devel subpackage * Not a gui program; no need for a .desktop file * Package loads into Tcl as expected and passes its own test suite. * Consistent use of macros * Does not own any directories that it should not own. MUSTFIX ======= * License does not match upstream. Should be BSD. * License file 'license.terms' not included. * Add the README and ChangeLog files to %doc * Does not own all directories that it creates. In %files, change %{_libdir}/thread%{version}/* to %{_libdir}/thread%{version} * Does not build properly on x86_64 in mock. The attached patch fixes the problem. * The dependency on gdbm is picked up automatically. You can drop Requires: gdbm. SHOULDFIX ========= * Missing a %check section for running the unit tests. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 2 23:07:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2006 18:07:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213600] Review Request: tinyca2 - Simple graphical userinterface to manage a small CA In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611022307.kA2N7B4K008038@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tinyca2 - Simple graphical userinterface to manage a small CA https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213600 ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2006-11-02 18:07 EST ------- Sorry, I have mixed BuildRequires with Requires in the last part of the review. I intented to say that you must add perl-gettext to the Requires line, which should become Requires: openssl tar zip perl-gettext ... unless I have made an evaluation error here and yum automatically picks and solves the dependencies for the needed perl modules. I for one I had to use yum search in order to find out which package provides perl-Locale-gettext. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 2 23:28:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2006 18:28:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 199029] Review Request: jokosher In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611022328.kA2NSt0u009749@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jokosher https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199029 ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at ameritech.net 2006-11-02 18:28 EST ------- No, I talked to Christopher about taking ownership of Jokosher also, since he didn't have time to work on it. I've done some initial work on this, but it makes sense to wait for 0.2 to come out since most of the outstanding issues will be fixed there. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 2 23:58:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2006 18:58:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213193] Review Request: gaim-rhythmbox - Rhythmbox plugin for GAIM In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611022358.kA2Nw2kP011458@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gaim-rhythmbox - Rhythmbox plugin for GAIM https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213193 wart at kobold.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |wart at kobold.org ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2006-11-02 18:58 EST ------- You're missing a couple of build requirements: BR: gtk2-devel dbus-glib-devel dbus-devel I'll pick up the full review tonight if Jochen doesn't get to it earlier. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 3 00:01:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2006 19:01:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 211548] Review Request: fluxstyle - Graphical style manager for fluxbox In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611030001.kA301eIM011714@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fluxstyle - Graphical style manager for fluxbox https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211548 ------- Additional Comments From miker5slow at grandecom.net 2006-11-02 19:01 EST ------- I dont know.. I just did a make build so I guess that will fix it. I did find out about the about dialog not closing when you click close, the gtk2 code changed so now I have to handle this with my own code instead of relying on it to "just work" like it did in older versions. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 3 00:19:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2006 19:19:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213798] New: Review Request: python-alsaaudio - Python Alsa Bindings Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213798 Summary: Review Request: python-alsaaudio - Python Alsa Bindings Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: bdpepple at ameritech.net QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://piedmont.homelinux.org/fedora/alsaaudio/python-alsaaudio.spec SRPM URL: http://piedmont.homelinux.org/fedora/alsaaudio/python-alsaaudio-0.2-1.src.rpm Description: The Python-AlsaAudio package contains bindings for the ALSA sound API. Note: rpmlint gives an error on the license, which is Python Software Foundation license. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 3 00:44:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2006 19:44:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213180] Review Request: tcl-thread - Thread extension for Tcl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611030044.kA30iAVn014510@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tcl-thread - Thread extension for Tcl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213180 wart at kobold.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 3 00:58:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2006 19:58:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213193] Review Request: gaim-rhythmbox - Rhythmbox plugin for GAIM In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611030058.kA30wJVd014742@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gaim-rhythmbox - Rhythmbox plugin for GAIM https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213193 ------- Additional Comments From michel.salim at gmail.com 2006-11-02 19:58 EST ------- Jochen's no longer CC'ed, so I guess you get to review it. http://hircus.org/fedora/gaim-rhythmbox/gaim-rhythmbox-2.0-0.2.beta3.src.rpm http://hircus.org/fedora/gaim-rhythmbox/gaim-rhythmbox.spec I'm creating a mock tree right now to test it further - ldd /usr/lib64/gaim/gaim-rhythmbox.so disturbingly claims that the .so file requires anything from Xinerama to libxml2. Is that normal? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 3 01:26:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2006 20:26:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 197754] Review Request: perl-Perl6-Bible In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611030126.kA31Q0Eb015575@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Perl6-Bible https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197754 steve at silug.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO_REPORTER |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From steve at silug.org 2006-11-02 20:25 EST ------- Apparently my first mail was incorrectly addressed, and gmail's spam filter ate the second one, but TPF President Bill Odom eventually noticed it and gave me this answer: Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2006 09:13:01 -0600 From: "Bill Odom" To: "Steven Pritchard" Subject: Re: documentation license question In-Reply-To: Steve: Okay, here's the definitive word from Allison, who's been immersed in the legal and licensing side for far longer than any one person should ever have to be: On 10/31/06, Allison Randal wrote: >The Perl 6 Bible is the Apocalypses, Exegeses, and Synopses. ... >They'll be under the same terms as the production release of Perl 6, >which is: > - they are covered by the author's contributor agreement to TPF > - the compilation copyright is owned by TPF > - authors retain their individual copyright in individual pieces > - Artistic 2.0 license Does that give you what you need, or should I do some more digging? Thanks, Bill -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 3 01:30:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2006 20:30:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213193] Review Request: gaim-rhythmbox - Rhythmbox plugin for GAIM In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611030130.kA31UExb015854@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gaim-rhythmbox - Rhythmbox plugin for GAIM https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213193 wart at kobold.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |wart at kobold.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 3 02:15:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2006 21:15:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 184011] Review Request: nickle In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611030215.kA32FWe7017926@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nickle https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=184011 ------- Additional Comments From michel.salim at gmail.com 2006-11-02 21:15 EST ------- pong. http://hircus.org/fedora/nickle/nickle-2.54-1.src.rpm http://hircus.org/fedora/nickle/nickle.spec Sorry for the late response! Changed the %ghost to %exclude and avoided using %dir and then listing everything under it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 3 02:40:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2006 21:40:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213193] Review Request: gaim-rhythmbox - Rhythmbox plugin for GAIM In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611030240.kA32eSTp019124@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gaim-rhythmbox - Rhythmbox plugin for GAIM https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213193 ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2006-11-02 21:40 EST ------- GOOD ==== * rpmlint output clean * Package named appropriately * Source matches upstream: a9e836986dae7857b408120782264d5a gaim-rhythmbox-2.0beta3.tar.gz * Builds in mock on FC6-i386, FC6-x86_64, FC7-i386, FC7-x86_64 * GPL license ok, license file included * Spec file legible and in Am. English. * Runs without crashing. Seems to work as expected with my AIM account. * No missing BR: * No locales * Not relocatable * Not a gui app; no need for a .desktop file * No need to run ldconfig; .so files are application plugins that aren't part of the system linker path. * Directory ownership ok * No duplicate %files * No need for -doc or -devel subpackages MUSTFIX ======= * Inconsistent use of the custom 'prever' macro. You only use it once in %prep, but not at all in Source0 or Release. Either use it in all 3 places, or not at all. NOTES ===== * You could also include AUTHORS and README in %doc * There's no need to split each sentence in %description into a separate paragraph. It just adds unnecessary whitespace and doesn't make it any easier to read. * Send the configure patch upstream so that it can be included in the final release. * I wouldn't worry about the shared library dependencies in the .so file. If you run ldd on the gaim executable itself, you'll see an almost-identical list of dependencies. Not much here. Just fix the use of the prever macro and you're good to go. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 3 03:16:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2006 22:16:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213193] Review Request: gaim-rhythmbox - Rhythmbox plugin for GAIM In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611030316.kA33Geg7020606@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gaim-rhythmbox - Rhythmbox plugin for GAIM https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213193 ------- Additional Comments From michel.salim at gmail.com 2006-11-02 22:16 EST ------- http://hircus.org/fedora/gaim-rhythmbox/gaim-rhythmbox-2.0-0.3.beta3.src.rpm http://hircus.org/fedora/gaim-rhythmbox/gaim-rhythmbox.spec Fixed. Sorry about %description, I copied it from upstream and did not think to reformat it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 3 03:38:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2006 22:38:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213193] Review Request: gaim-rhythmbox - Rhythmbox plugin for GAIM In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611030338.kA33cZ54021770@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gaim-rhythmbox - Rhythmbox plugin for GAIM https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213193 wart at kobold.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2006-11-02 22:38 EST ------- Changes look good. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 3 04:01:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2006 23:01:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213594] Review Request: eclipse-phpeclipse In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611030401.kA341AjV022992@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-phpeclipse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213594 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at theholbrooks.org 2006-11-02 23:01 EST ------- Spec URL: http://theholbrooks.org/RPMS/eclipse-phpeclipse.spec SRPM URL: http://theholbrooks.org/RPMS/eclipse-phpeclipse-1.1.8-9.src.rpm Done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 3 04:20:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2006 23:20:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213180] Review Request: tcl-thread - Thread extension for Tcl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611030420.kA34Kp1U024274@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tcl-thread - Thread extension for Tcl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213180 ------- Additional Comments From jwboyer at jdub.homelinux.org 2006-11-02 23:20 EST ------- Thanks much for the review. I'll get those items fixed up, including the x86_64 issue, tomorrow. I should have fixed the MUSTFIXes before submitting, sorry about that. That's what I get for copying the initial spec from a different package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 3 04:29:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2006 23:29:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 189195] Review Request: horde - php application framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611030429.kA34TO7K024871@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: horde - php application framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189195 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at theholbrooks.org 2006-11-02 23:29 EST ------- Spec URL: http://theholbrooks.org/RPMS/horde.spec SRPM URL: http://theholbrooks.org/RPMS/horde-3.1.3-5.src.rpm I agree with your suggestions, and have implemented all of them. Note that rpmlint now complains with conffile-without-noreplace on the .dist and .xml files in /etc, but I have explained it in a note in the %files secion. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 3 04:38:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2006 23:38:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 212692] New package: libgnomekbd In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611030438.kA34cos5025655@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: New package: libgnomekbd https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212692 mclasen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 3 04:39:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2006 23:39:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213180] Review Request: tcl-thread - Thread extension for Tcl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611030439.kA34dDZ6025738@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tcl-thread - Thread extension for Tcl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213180 ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2006-11-02 23:39 EST ------- np. I'm a sucker for Tcl package reviews, and I'm interested to see how well this works with tclhttpd. Is there another review on the way that depends on this package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 3 04:41:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2006 23:41:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213180] Review Request: tcl-thread - Thread extension for Tcl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611030441.kA34fHqb025946@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tcl-thread - Thread extension for Tcl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213180 wart at kobold.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 3 04:46:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2006 23:46:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 212836] Review Request: fwfstab - a graphical file system table (fstab) editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611030446.kA34kKLj026369@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fwfstab - a graphical file system table (fstab) editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212836 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-11-02 23:46 EST ------- Now this package looks ok in its packaging and its functioning. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 3 04:54:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2006 23:54:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 212836] Review Request: fwfstab - a graphical file system table (fstab) editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611030454.kA34sIvV026931@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fwfstab - a graphical file system table (fstab) editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212836 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-11-02 23:54 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (development i386) for FC6. + rpmlint is silent for RPM and SRPM. + source files match upstream. fb87e760037a9497b1e8f47c8715e65d fwfstab-0.01.1.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written but NOT properly indented. + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. License text included in package. + %doc is small; no -doc subpackage required. + %doc does not affect runtime. + COPYING included in %doc. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc files. + no -devel subpackage exists + no .la files. + no translations available + Provides: config(fwfstab) = 0.01.1-1.fc6 + Requires: /bin/bash /usr/bin/python config(fwfstab) = 0.01.1-1.fc6 pygtk2 pygtk2-libglade python(abi) = 2.4 redhat-artwork usermode + owns the directories it creates. + doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + Desktop file installed succesfully + Desktop file is handled correclty in SPEC file. + GUI app + Followed python packaging guidelines. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 3 04:59:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2006 23:59:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 212836] Review Request: fwfstab - a graphical file system table (fstab) editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611030459.kA34xgci027374@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fwfstab - a graphical file system table (fstab) editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212836 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-11-02 23:59 EST ------- Don't Forget to CLOSE this bug once you import this package in CVS. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 3 05:59:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2006 00:59:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213432] Review Request: kaffeine - Xine-based media player In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611030559.kA35xmBL029325@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kaffeine - Xine-based media player https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213432 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-11-03 00:59 EST ------- you gave old package link. Also new package is not building under mock you need to change chmod line in SPEC as chmod is not able to find all those files that need to be chmod chmod -x %{_builddir}/%{name}-%{version}/AUTHORS \ %{_builddir}/%{name}-%{version}/Changelog \ %{_builddir}/%{name}-%{version}/INSTALL \ %{_builddir}/%{name}-%{version}/TODO -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 3 07:03:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2006 02:03:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213511] Review Request: gxine - Gnome frontend for the xine multimedia library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611030703.kA373uBi031752@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gxine - Gnome frontend for the xine multimedia library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213511 ------- Additional Comments From mola at c100c.com 2006-11-03 02:03 EST ------- Update Spec : http://www.c100c.com/fedora/gxine.spec Rrpm : http://www.c100c.com/fedora/gxine-0.5.8-2.src.rpm i patch it for use free logo.ogg some fix help for :) %{name}.theme.mo file -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 3 07:30:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2006 02:30:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213432] Review Request: kaffeine - Xine-based media player In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611030730.kA37UnXn032548@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kaffeine - Xine-based media player https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213432 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-11-03 02:30 EST ------- I will like to review this package. Update package by solving mockbuild error. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 3 07:51:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2006 02:51:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 211703] Review Request: nyquist - Sound synthesis and composition language with a Lisp syntax In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611030751.kA37p25U001387@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nyquist - Sound synthesis and composition language with a Lisp syntax https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211703 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-11-03 02:50 EST ------- Okay, this package meets the demand by http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- This package (nyquist) is APPROVED by me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 3 07:53:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2006 02:53:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 209311] Review Request: espeak - Software speech synthesizer (text-to-speech) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611030753.kA37rcOg001495@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: espeak - Software speech synthesizer (text-to-speech) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209311 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 3 08:14:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2006 03:14:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 193059] Review Request: ibmasm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611030814.kA38E4aE002011@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ibmasm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193059 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-11-03 03:14 EST ------- Builds fine in mock, rpmlint is quiet. Full review time Spec file clear, in US English License is good and the exclusivearch is commented - you will need to add a blocked on 64 bit architectures though via bugzilla Consistent use of macros Init scripts correctly used pre/post scripts look good Builds cleanly in mock rpmlint quiet includes devel file, no pc file so no pkg-config required devel package contains the correct information documentation include (though not for the devel package - this is okay) Needs work -devel needs the line %{_includedir}/ibmasm/*.h changing to %{_includedir}/ibmasm otherwise you the package won't own the directory -permissions should be the same for both packages Do these changes and I'm happy. You will still need a sponsor before you can import this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 3 08:23:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2006 03:23:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213765] Review Request: alex4 - Alex the Allegator 4 - Platform game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611030823.kA38NKtV002336@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: alex4 - Alex the Allegator 4 - Platform game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213765 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-11-03 03:23 EST ------- rpmlint is quiet builds fine in mock Review - note, that you'll need something for #1 before it's approved (though you can ignore my first comment - I've just seen the smp_mflags!) Good spec file clear and in US English upstream md5 and package md5 are the same license good consistent use of macros permissions fine update-icon-cache fine files permissions good package includes documentation no-devel package required package installs and runs fine (x86 and x86_64) - minimal test though needs work --add-category X-Fedora annoys the buildsys for rawhide Fix the needs work and it's good to go. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 3 10:33:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2006 05:33:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213832] New: Review Request: arpwatch - Network monitoring tools for tracking IP addresses on a network Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213832 Summary: Review Request: arpwatch - Network monitoring tools for tracking IP addresses on a network Product: Fedora Core Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mlichvar at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com This is a split from tcpdump package, bug #193657. Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/jnovy/files/arpwatch.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/jnovy/files/arpwatch-2.1a15-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: The arpwatch package contains arpwatch and arpsnmp. Arpwatch and arpsnmp are both network monitoring tools. Both utilities monitor Ethernet or FDDI network traffic and build databases of Ethernet/IP address pairs, and can report certain changes via email. Install the arpwatch package if you need networking monitoring devices which will automatically keep track of the IP addresses on your network. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 3 11:38:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2006 06:38:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213180] Review Request: tcl-thread - Thread extension for Tcl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611031138.kA3BcdCf021168@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tcl-thread - Thread extension for Tcl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213180 ------- Additional Comments From jwboyer at jdub.homelinux.org 2006-11-03 06:38 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > np. I'm a sucker for Tcl package reviews, and I'm interested to see how well > this works with tclhttpd. Is there another review on the way that depends on > this package? Not as of yet. However the gitk author is probably going to use the Thread extention soon so that the main window is still responsive while another thread does the refresh/lookups. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 3 11:56:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2006 06:56:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 204700] Review Request: njb-sharp - C# bindings to libnjb In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611031156.kA3Bup0u022613@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: njb-sharp - C# bindings to libnjb https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204700 ------- Additional Comments From triad at df.lth.se 2006-11-03 06:56 EST ------- Hm, well I might have misunderstood something but as far as I know I have fixed all issues. rpmlint is silent apart from a message about the macros that can be ignored in this case I believe. Parallell build is still broken but disabling parallell building effectively fixes that for now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 3 12:12:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2006 07:12:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213600] Review Request: tinyca2 - Simple graphical userinterface to manage a small CA In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611031212.kA3CClYg023717@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tinyca2 - Simple graphical userinterface to manage a small CA https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213600 ------- Additional Comments From enrico.scholz at informatik.tu-chemnitz.de 2006-11-03 07:12 EST ------- mmh... I don't understand > - SHOULD: on a RHEL4 system the rpm installed fine but the program > did not run, failing with: > error: Failed dependencies: > perl(Gtk2) is needed by tinyca2-0.7.5-2.noarch This seems to be an rpm message but not an error given out by the program. > On FC6 it detected the missing Requires, but failed to get installed > even after installing perl-Gtk2 and gettext: Who is "it"? > error: Failed dependencies: > perl(Locale::gettext) is needed by tinyca2-0.7.5-2.noarch mmh... this seems to be a bug in FC6 yum then. 'perl(Locale::gettext)' is provided by the perl-gettext packages both from FC5 and FC6. Within FC5, package and the perl-gettext dependency installed fine: | # http_proxy= yum localinstall tinyca2-0.7.5-2.noarch.rpm | Installing: | tinyca2 noarch 0.7.5-2 tinyca2-0.7.5-2.noarch.rpm 546 k | Installing for dependencies: | perl-gettext i386 1.05-8.fc5 extras 20 k | ... | Installed: tinyca2.noarch 0:0.7.5-2 | Dependency Installed: perl-gettext.i386 0:1.05-8.fc5 | Complete! | # -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 3 12:48:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2006 07:48:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213432] Review Request: kaffeine - Xine-based media player In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611031248.kA3CmTd4027071@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kaffeine - Xine-based media player https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213432 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-11-03 07:48 EST ------- Spec URL: http://kde-redhat.unl.edu/apt/kde-redhat/SPECS/kaffeine.spec SRPM URL: http://kde-redhat.unl.edu/apt/kde-redhat/all/SRPMS.stable/kaffeine-0.8.2-5.src.rpm %changelog * Fri Nov 03 2006 Rex Dieter 0.8.2-5 - fix chmod so it actually works. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 3 12:48:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2006 07:48:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213600] Review Request: tinyca2 - Simple graphical userinterface to manage a small CA In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611031248.kA3CmZK3027095@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tinyca2 - Simple graphical userinterface to manage a small CA https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213600 ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2006-11-03 07:48 EST ------- OK,. let me rephrase: Everything is fine, my test failed because I was using only rpm rather then yum.:) The only problems are the two cosmetic ones (mixed spaces with tabs and the build root). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 3 13:01:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2006 08:01:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213432] Review Request: kaffeine - Xine-based media player In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611031301.kA3D1Mk3028243@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kaffeine - Xine-based media player https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213432 cgoorah at yahoo.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |cgoorah at yahoo.com.au ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2006-11-03 08:01 EST ------- I'll do the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 3 13:33:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2006 08:33:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 212836] Review Request: fwfstab - a graphical file system table (fstab) editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611031333.kA3DXfkr029753@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fwfstab - a graphical file system table (fstab) editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212836 s.adam at diffingo.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 3 13:34:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2006 08:34:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 212836] Review Request: fwfstab - a graphical file system table (fstab) editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611031334.kA3DY8C8029783@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fwfstab - a graphical file system table (fstab) editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212836 ------- Additional Comments From s.adam at diffingo.com 2006-11-03 08:34 EST ------- Done. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 3 13:37:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2006 08:37:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213765] Review Request: alex4 - Alex the Allegator 4 - Platform game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611031337.kA3DbUjP030081@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: alex4 - Alex the Allegator 4 - Platform game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213765 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-11-03 08:37 EST ------- Thanks for the review! (In reply to comment #2) > needs work > --add-category X-Fedora annoys the buildsys for rawhide > That is no longer a problem as there has been a new desktop-file-utils system in rawhide for a few days now which fixes this. > Fix the needs work and it's good to go. Well what did really need fixing where the endian issues I already reported, here is a new version with those fixed (no other changes were made): Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/alex4.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/alex4-1.0-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 3 13:47:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2006 08:47:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 208169] Review Request: python-twisted-core - An asynchronous networking framework written in Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611031347.kA3Dlgs5031275@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-twisted-core - An asynchronous networking framework written in Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208169 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-11-03 08:47 EST ------- A few more quick comments before I do a more detailed review (hopefully later today): 1. I think the Group for the -doc subpackage should be Documentation 2. I think the Group for the -zsh subpackage should be System Environment/Shells (? la bash-completion in Extras) 3. Is %{python_sitearch}/twisted/python/_twisted_zsh_stub needed, or can it be removed since we have %{_datadir}/zsh/site-functions/_twisted_zsh_stub? 4. The docs in the -zsh subpackage are duplicates of the same docs in the main package. How about as an alternative: %prep ... # Generate a brief README.zsh awk '/^Zsh Notes:/,/^Have fun!/' twisted/python/zshcomp.py > README.zsh %files zsh ... %doc README.zsh 5. TwistedCore contains an extensive test suite. After installing the package, I can run it OK using "trial twisted", but it seems to fail some tests when I try to run it in the buildroot in %check; any thoughts on what to do about testing? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 3 13:50:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2006 08:50:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 203520] Review Request: evolution-brutus In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611031350.kA3DoCt2031512@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: evolution-brutus Alias: evolution-brutus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203520 ------- Additional Comments From colding at omesc.com 2006-11-03 08:50 EST ------- Ok, this took a while, but I finally gor around all of the autoconf 2.59 => 2.60 issues. I've also changed the URLs below to point to the rawhide packages. SRPM: http://www.omesc.com/content/downloads/dist/Fedora%20Core%20Development/SRPMS/evolution-brutus-1.1.9-1.src.rpm SPEC: http://www.omesc.com/content/downloads/dist/Fedora%20Core%20Development/SPECS/evolution-brutus.spec Best regards, jules -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 3 14:04:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2006 09:04:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213600] Review Request: tinyca2 - Simple graphical userinterface to manage a small CA In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611031404.kA3E4s8m000449@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tinyca2 - Simple graphical userinterface to manage a small CA https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213600 ------- Additional Comments From enrico.scholz at informatik.tu-chemnitz.de 2006-11-03 09:04 EST ------- sorry; I won't change these two issues. rpmlint is wrong about the whitespace-tab mixes and the buildroot with %(id...) is just stupid and not required -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 3 14:27:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2006 09:27:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213600] Review Request: tinyca2 - Simple graphical userinterface to manage a small CA In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611031427.kA3ERdYc002802@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tinyca2 - Simple graphical userinterface to manage a small CA https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213600 ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2006-11-03 09:27 EST ------- Use :set list in vi and you will notice that rpmlint is not wrong about the mixes :) The buildroot is just a recommended value, so should not be a blocker. But it's up to a sponsor to decide. I am just a newcomer. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 3 14:52:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2006 09:52:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213600] Review Request: tinyca2 - Simple graphical userinterface to manage a small CA In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611031452.kA3EqArV005303@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tinyca2 - Simple graphical userinterface to manage a small CA https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213600 ------- Additional Comments From enrico.scholz at informatik.tu-chemnitz.de 2006-11-03 09:52 EST ------- I do not see mixed tab-spaces; TABs are used consistently. But I do not replace every ' +' with a TAB just because it ends at a tab-position. I do not need a sponsor; just a reviewer. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 3 14:59:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2006 09:59:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213765] Review Request: alex4 - Alex the Allegator 4 - Platform game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611031459.kA3ExMSr005870@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: alex4 - Alex the Allegator 4 - Platform game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213765 paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-11-03 09:59 EST ------- It looks good at this end. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 3 15:10:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2006 10:10:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213121] Review Request: fast-user-switch-applet - a panel applet for switching users In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611031510.kA3FAX8J006820@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fast-user-switch-applet - a panel applet for switching users https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213121 mclasen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |davidz at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 3 15:21:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2006 10:21:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213868] New: Review Request: libpcap - A system-independent interface for user-level packet capture Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213868 Summary: Review Request: libpcap - A system-independent interface for user-level packet capture Product: Fedora Core Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mlichvar at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com This is another split off tcpdump package, bug #193657. Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/jnovy/files/libpcap.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/jnovy/files/libpcap-0.9.5-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: Libpcap provides a portable framework for low-level network monitoring. Libpcap can provide network statistics collection, security monitoring and network debugging. Since almost every system vendor provides a different interface for packet capture, the libpcap authors created this system-independent API to ease in porting and to alleviate the need for several system-dependent packet capture modules in each application. Install libpcap if you need to do low-level network traffic monitoring on your network. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 3 15:45:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2006 10:45:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 209311] Review Request: espeak - Software speech synthesizer (text-to-speech) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611031545.kA3FjQSt010352@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: espeak - Software speech synthesizer (text-to-speech) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209311 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-11-03 10:45 EST ------- Well, a lot of improvements!! The left things are: 1. From http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines : * Use rpmlint - Now -debuginfo rpm is correctly created, however, this package (-debuginfo) bears lots of complaint, e.g. E: espeak-debuginfo script-without-shebang \ /usr/src/debug/espeak-1.16-source/src/sintab.h This is due to incorrect permission. Please change this to 0644. 2. From http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines : (= Nothing). 3. Other things I have noticed : * Well, I recommend changing suffix for different patches. * It seems that makefile_rpmoptflags.patch is not necessary, which can be replaced with: make %{?_smp_mflags} BIN_NAME=espeak CXXFLAGS=${RPM_OPT_FLAGS} * The original files .orig files e.g. /usr/share/doc/espeak-1.16/html/add_language.html.orig are not necessary. = Well, * the license issue of binary voice data * file list of -devel package are okay. -------------------------------------------------------------- Please fix above. After that, I will accept this package and sponsor you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 3 15:52:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2006 10:52:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213765] Review Request: alex4 - Alex the Allegator 4 - Platform game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611031552.kA3Fqixs010959@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: alex4 - Alex the Allegator 4 - Platform game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213765 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-11-03 10:52 EST ------- Thanks! Imported and build, closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 3 16:35:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2006 11:35:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 211336] Review Request: adesklets - A simple architecture for desktop applets In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611031635.kA3GZ5Tu014873@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: adesklets - A simple architecture for desktop applets Alias: adeskets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211336 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-11-03 11:35 EST ------- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 3 17:18:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2006 12:18:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 205755] Review Request: elsa - manages group of processes and allows accounting In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611031718.kA3HILsn019319@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: elsa - manages group of processes and allows accounting https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205755 ------- Additional Comments From konradr at redhat.com 2006-11-03 12:18 EST ------- Matt, That was the problem. It is further aggrevated by the fact that I have lots of kernels in that directory. A clean build machine shouldn't have this problem as it installs all the RPMs in a chroot-ed location (for more details refer to mock RPM). I asked Jon Masters to take a look at this BZ, since he has a macro that determines the latest kernel and sets the kernel path in an environment. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 3 17:22:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2006 12:22:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 203520] Review Request: evolution-brutus In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611031722.kA3HMY4i019837@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: evolution-brutus Alias: evolution-brutus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203520 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-11-03 12:22 EST ------- 2nd review of this package: A. From http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines : * Use rpmlint rpmlint is not yet silent. --------------------------------------------------------- W: evolution-brutus devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/libBrutusd-1.0.so W: evolution-brutus devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/libBrutus-1.0.so W: evolution-brutus devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/libBrutusPROXY-1.0.so W: evolution-brutus devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/libBrutusSTUBS-1.0.so W: evolution-brutus devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/libBrutusSKELS-1.0.so --------------------------------------------------------- These files should be in -devel package. * BuildRequires: The following BR are redundant. - libglade2-devel <- this is required by gtkhtml3-devel <- this is required by evolution-devel * Requires: - For -devel package: Well, .pc files only includes: --------------------------------------------------------- Requires: libIDL-2.0 >= 0.8.5, ORBit-2.0 >= 2.14.1, libBrutusSTUBS-1.0, libBrutusSKELS-1.0 Requires: libIDL-2.0 >= 0.8.5, ORBit-2.0 >= 2.14.1, libBrutusSTUBS-1.0 Requires: libIDL-2.0 >= 0.8.5, ORBit-2.0 >= 2.14.1, libBrutusSTUBS-1.0 Requires: libIDL-2.0 >= 0.8.5, ORBit-2.0 >= 2.14.1 Requires: libIDL-2.0 >= 0.8.5, ORBit-2.0 >= 2.14.1, libBrutusSTUBS-1.0 --------------------------------------------------------- This usually means that -devel package only requies: * main package * pkgconfig * ORBit2-devel (libIDL-devel is required by ORBit2-devel) Would you explain why -devel package requires some extra packages? - By the way, .pc files includes: Cflags: -I/lib/glib-2.0/include This causes no problem (so this is not a blocker), however, this makes no sense. = From http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines: None ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- NOTE: Before being sponsored: This package will be accepted with another few work. But before I accept this package, someone (I am a candidate) should sponsor you. Once you are sponsored, you have the right to formally review other submitters' review request and approve the packages. For this reason, the person who want to be sponsored (like you) are required to "show that you have an understanding of the process and of the packaging guidelines". Usually there are two ways to show this. A. submit other review requests with enough quality. B. Do a "pre-review" (at the time you are not sponsored, you cannot do a formal review) of other person's review request. Please check the details on http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/HowToGetSponsored -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 3 17:23:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2006 12:23:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 205755] Review Request: elsa - manages group of processes and allows accounting In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611031723.kA3HNmES019984@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: elsa - manages group of processes and allows accounting https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205755 ------- Additional Comments From konradr at redhat.com 2006-11-03 12:23 EST ------- Build on FC6 build system failed, with this error: Installing /builddir/build/SRPMS/elsa-1.3.0-2.fc6.src.rpm Building target platforms: i386 Building for target i386 Executing(%prep): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.1379 + umask 022 + cd /builddir/build/BUILD + LANG=C + export LANG + unset DISPLAY + cd /builddir/build/BUILD + rm -rf elsa-1.3.0 + /usr/bin/bzip2 -dc /builddir/build/SOURCES/elsa-1.3.0.tar.bz2 + tar -xf - + STATUS=0 + '[' 0 -ne 0 ']' + cd elsa-1.3.0 ++ /usr/bin/id -u + '[' 250 = 0 ']' ++ /usr/bin/id -u + '[' 250 = 0 ']' + /bin/chmod -Rf a+rX,u+w,g-w,o-w . + exit 0 Executing(%build): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.1379 + umask 022 + cd /builddir/build/BUILD + cd elsa-1.3.0 + LANG=C + export LANG + unset DISPLAY ++ rpm -q kernel-devel ++ head -n 1 ++ cut --delimiter=- -f 3,4 + CFLAGS='-O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m32 -march=i386 -mtune=generic -fasynchronous-unwind-tables' + make -j4 USER_INCLUDES=-I/usr/src/kernels/2.6.18-1.2798.fc6-i686/include make -C job_daemon USER_INCLUDES=-I/usr/src/kernels/2.6.18-1.2798.fc6-i686/include make[1]: Entering directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/elsa-1.3.0/job_daemon' gcc -g -O2 -Wall -I/usr/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/lib/glib-2.0/include -L/lib -lglib-2.0 -I/usr/src/kernels/2.6.18-1.2798.fc6-i686/include jobd.c -o jobd jobd.c: In function 'cn_fork_listen': jobd.c:96: error: invalid application of 'sizeof' to incomplete type 'struct cn_msg' jobd.c:104: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type jobd.c:104: error: 'CN_IDX_PROC' undeclared (first use in this function) jobd.c:104: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once jobd.c:104: error: for each function it appears in.) jobd.c:105: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type jobd.c:105: error: 'CN_VAL_PROC' undeclared (first use in this function) jobd.c:106: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type jobd.c:107: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type jobd.c:108: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type jobd.c:109: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type jobd.c: In function 'cn_fork_ignore': jobd.c:129: error: invalid application of 'sizeof' to incomplete type 'struct cn_msg' jobd.c:137: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type jobd.c:137: error: 'CN_IDX_PROC' undeclared (first use in this function) jobd.c:138: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type jobd.c:138: error: 'CN_VAL_PROC' undeclared (first use in this function) jobd.c:139: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type jobd.c:140: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type jobd.c:141: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type jobd.c:142: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type jobd.c: In function 'recv_sk_nl': jobd.c:596: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type jobd.c: In function 'main': jobd.c:768: error: 'CN_IDX_PROC' undeclared (first use in this function) make[1]: *** [jobd] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/elsa-1.3.0/job_daemon' make: *** [all] Error 2 error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.1379 (%build) RPM build errors: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.1379 (%build) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 3 17:24:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2006 12:24:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 205755] Review Request: elsa - manages group of processes and allows accounting In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611031724.kA3HOvsh020109@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: elsa - manages group of processes and allows accounting https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205755 ------- Additional Comments From konradr at redhat.com 2006-11-03 12:24 EST ------- On FC5 build: Installing /builddir/build/SRPMS/elsa-1.3.0-2.fc5.src.rpm Building target platforms: x86_64 Building for target x86_64 Executing(%prep): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.86186 + umask 022 + cd /builddir/build/BUILD + LANG=C + export LANG + unset DISPLAY + cd /builddir/build/BUILD + rm -rf elsa-1.3.0 + /usr/bin/bzip2 -dc /builddir/build/SOURCES/elsa-1.3.0.tar.bz2 + tar -xf - + STATUS=0 + '[' 0 -ne 0 ']' + cd elsa-1.3.0 ++ /usr/bin/id -u + '[' 250 = 0 ']' ++ /usr/bin/id -u + '[' 250 = 0 ']' + /bin/chmod -Rf a+rX,u+w,g-w,o-w . + exit 0 Executing(%build): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.86186 + umask 022 + cd /builddir/build/BUILD + cd elsa-1.3.0 + LANG=C + export LANG + unset DISPLAY ++ rpm -q kernel-devel ++ head -n 1 ++ cut --delimiter=- -f 3,4 + CFLAGS='-O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64 -mtune=generic' + make -j4 USER_INCLUDES=-I/usr/src/kernels/2.6.18-1.2200.fc5-x86_64/include make -C job_daemon USER_INCLUDES=-I/usr/src/kernels/2.6.18-1.2200.fc5-x86_64/include make[1]: Entering directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/elsa-1.3.0/job_daemon' gcc -g -O2 -Wall -I/usr/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/lib64/glib-2.0/include -lglib-2.0 -I/usr/src/kernels/2.6.18-1.2200.fc5-x86_64/include jobd.c -o jobd jobd.c: In function 'cn_fork_listen': jobd.c:96: error: invalid application of 'sizeof' to incomplete type 'struct cn_msg' jobd.c:104: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type jobd.c:104: error: 'CN_IDX_PROC' undeclared (first use in this function) jobd.c:104: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once jobd.c:104: error: for each function it appears in.) jobd.c:105: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type jobd.c:105: error: 'CN_VAL_PROC' undeclared (first use in this function) jobd.c:106: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type jobd.c:107: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type jobd.c:108: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type jobd.c:109: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type jobd.c: In function 'cn_fork_ignore': jobd.c:129: error: invalid application of 'sizeof' to incomplete type 'struct cn_msg' jobd.c:137: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type jobd.c:137: error: 'CN_IDX_PROC' undeclared (first use in this function) jobd.c:138: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type jobd.c:138: error: 'CN_VAL_PROC' undeclared (first use in this function) jobd.c:139: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type jobd.c:140: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type jobd.c:141: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type jobd.c:142: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type jobd.c: In function 'recv_sk_nl': jobd.c:596: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type jobd.c: In function 'main': jobd.c:768: error: 'CN_IDX_PROC' undeclared (first use in this function) make[1]: *** [jobd] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/elsa-1.3.0/job_daemon' make: *** [all] Error 2 error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.86186 (%build) RPM build errors: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.86186 (%build) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 3 17:48:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2006 12:48:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 211336] Review Request: adesklets - A simple architecture for desktop applets In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611031748.kA3HmptI023060@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: adesklets - A simple architecture for desktop applets Alias: adeskets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211336 ------- Additional Comments From luya_tfz at thefinalzone.com 2006-11-03 12:48 EST ------- Sorry for the delay. I had a busy schedule I was unable to edit the spec file. In addition, the server went down because the host went out of busines and I just recently got a new host. The modification will come soon. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 3 18:01:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2006 13:01:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213511] Review Request: gxine - Gnome frontend for the xine multimedia library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611031801.kA3I178r024266@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gxine - Gnome frontend for the xine multimedia library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213511 ------- Additional Comments From michel.salim at gmail.com 2006-11-03 13:01 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=140298) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=140298&action=view) Patch to gxine.spec Several things: - The find-lang.sh in redhat-rpm-config does not support the --all-name switch, so I'm using the one in /usr/lib/rpm instead. The proper way of using %find_lang is commented out, you can uncomment it when redhat-rpm-config is updated - the version numbers you use in the changelog were incorrect. Separate version number and release number with -, not . You might want to consider BuildReq:ing the other libraries specified in the INSTALL file? A lot of them are in core and/or extras, so you might want to turn on support for them. Dual-monitor people will be really annoyed if you don't link against Xinerama :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 3 18:05:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2006 13:05:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213902] New: Review Request: tclparser - Tcl syntax parser Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213902 Summary: Review Request: tclparser - Tcl syntax parser Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: wart at kobold.org QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.kobold.org/~wart/fedora/tclparser.spec SRPM URL: http://www.kobold.org/~wart/fedora/tclparser-1.4-1.20061030cvs.src.rpm Description: A parser for the Tcl scripting language. It is used by the Tcl syntax checker to parse a Tcl script into commands, words and tokens. Note: Upstream has not released official tarballs of this package. When I asked about it, they said they did not have time for generating official releases and that CVS snapshots should be used instead. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 3 18:08:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2006 13:08:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213904] New: Review Request: tclchecker - Tcl syntax checker Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213904 Summary: Review Request: tclchecker - Tcl syntax checker Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: wart at kobold.org QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.kobold.org/~wart/fedora/tclchecker.spec SRPM URL: http://www.kobold.org/~wart/fedora/tclchecker-1.4-1.20061030cvs.src.rpm Description: A syntax checking library for the Tcl scripting language Note: Upstream has not released official tarballs of this package. When I asked about it, they said they did not have time for generating official releases and that CVS snapshots should be used instead. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 3 18:10:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2006 13:10:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213904] Review Request: tclchecker - Tcl syntax checker In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611031810.kA3IADnq025189@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tclchecker - Tcl syntax checker Alias: tclchecker https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213904 wart at kobold.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |213595, 213902 Alias| |tclchecker -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 3 18:10:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2006 13:10:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213902] Review Request: tclparser - Tcl syntax parser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611031810.kA3IAEt4025194@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tclparser - Tcl syntax parser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213902 wart at kobold.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |213904 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 3 18:10:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2006 13:10:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213595] Review Request: tbcload - Tcl bytecode loader In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611031810.kA3IAF5U025199@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tbcload - Tcl bytecode loader https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213595 wart at kobold.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |213904 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 3 18:12:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2006 13:12:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213905] New: Review Request: tcldebugger - Tcl debugging library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213905 Summary: Review Request: tcldebugger - Tcl debugging library Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: wart at kobold.org QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.kobold.org/~wart/fedora/tcldebugger.spec SRPM URL: http://www.kobold.org/~wart/fedora/tcldebugger-1.4-1.20061030cvs.src.rpm Description: A debugging library for the Tcl scripting language Note: Upstream has not released official tarballs of this package. When I asked about it, they said they did not have time for generating official releases and that CVS snapshots should be used instead. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 3 18:13:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2006 13:13:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213905] Review Request: tcldebugger - Tcl debugging library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611031813.kA3IDQ0A025560@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tcldebugger - Tcl debugging library Alias: tcldebugger https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213905 wart at kobold.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |213595, 213902 Alias| |tcldebugger -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 3 18:13:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2006 13:13:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213902] Review Request: tclparser - Tcl syntax parser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611031813.kA3IDSbj025566@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tclparser - Tcl syntax parser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213902 wart at kobold.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |213905 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 3 18:13:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2006 13:13:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213595] Review Request: tbcload - Tcl bytecode loader In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611031813.kA3IDTUj025571@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tbcload - Tcl bytecode loader https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213595 wart at kobold.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |213905 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 3 18:14:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2006 13:14:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213906] New: Review Request: Pound - a reverse proxy and load balancer Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213906 Summary: Review Request: Pound - a reverse proxy and load balancer Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: ruben at rubenkerkhof.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://rubenkerkhof.com/packages/pound/Pound.spec SRPM URL: http://rubenkerkhof.com/packages/pound/Pound-2.1.5-1.src.rpm Description: The Pound program is a reverse proxy, load balancer and HTTPS front-end for Web server(s). Pound was developed to enable distributing the load among several Web-servers and to allow for a convenient SSL wrapper for those Web servers that do not offer it natively. Pound is distributed under the GPL - no warranty, it's free to use, copy and give away. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 3 18:15:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2006 13:15:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213907] New: Review Request: tclpro - Tcl debugging environment Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213907 Summary: Review Request: tclpro - Tcl debugging environment Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: wart at kobold.org QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.kobold.org/~wart/fedora/tclpro.spec SRPM URL: http://www.kobold.org/~wart/fedora/tclpro-1.5.0-6.20061030cvs.src.rpm Description: The TclPro debugging suite includes a graphical debugger, a static code checker, a compiler that writes out Tcl byte codes, and a loader that reads byte codes. Note: Upstream has not released official tarballs of this package. When I asked about it, they said they did not have time for generating official releases and that CVS snapshots should be used instead. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 3 18:18:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2006 13:18:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213907] Review Request: tclpro - Tcl debugging environment In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611031818.kA3IIT4N026093@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tclpro - Tcl debugging environment Alias: tclpro https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213907 wart at kobold.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |213596, 213904, 213905 Alias| |tclpro -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 3 18:18:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2006 13:18:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213596] Review Request: tclcompiler - Tcl bytecode compiler In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611031818.kA3IIdU0026106@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tclcompiler - Tcl bytecode compiler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213596 wart at kobold.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |213907 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 3 18:18:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2006 13:18:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213905] Review Request: tcldebugger - Tcl debugging library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611031818.kA3IIepX026111@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tcldebugger - Tcl debugging library Alias: tcldebugger https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213905 wart at kobold.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |213907 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 3 18:18:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2006 13:18:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213904] Review Request: tclchecker - Tcl syntax checker In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611031818.kA3IIof3026127@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tclchecker - Tcl syntax checker Alias: tclchecker https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213904 wart at kobold.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |213907 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 3 18:18:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2006 13:18:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213906] Review Request: Pound - a reverse proxy and load balancer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611031818.kA3IItax026139@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Pound - a reverse proxy and load balancer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213906 ruben at rubenkerkhof.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: Pound - a |Review Request: Pound - a |reverse proxy and load |reverse proxy and load |balancer |balancer ------- Additional Comments From ruben at rubenkerkhof.com 2006-11-03 13:18 EST ------- This is my first package, and I'm looking for a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 3 18:19:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2006 13:19:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213902] Review Request: tclparser - Tcl syntax parser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611031819.kA3IJkJE026197@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tclparser - Tcl syntax parser Alias: tclparser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213902 wart at kobold.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |tclparser -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 3 18:19:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2006 13:19:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213596] Review Request: tclcompiler - Tcl bytecode compiler In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611031819.kA3IJwdH026208@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tclcompiler - Tcl bytecode compiler Alias: tclcompiler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213596 wart at kobold.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |tclcompiler -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 3 18:20:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2006 13:20:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213595] Review Request: tbcload - Tcl bytecode loader In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611031820.kA3IKU3g026266@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tbcload - Tcl bytecode loader Alias: tbcload https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213595 wart at kobold.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |tbcload -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 3 18:41:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2006 13:41:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 205755] Review Request: elsa - manages group of processes and allows accounting In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611031841.kA3IfaAq028625@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: elsa - manages group of processes and allows accounting https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205755 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2006-11-03 13:41 EST ------- Isn't it inappropriate to use kernel-devel for building userland things, and the public userlan stuff in kernel-headers should be used instead? Eg. $ rpm -qf /usr/include/linux/cn_proc.h kernel-headers-2.6.18-1.2798.fc6.x86_64 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 3 18:56:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2006 13:56:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213907] Review Request: tclpro - Tcl debugging environment In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611031856.kA3Iu6SY030112@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tclpro - Tcl debugging environment Alias: tclpro https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213907 paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-11-03 13:56 EST ------- Release: 6 - eh? surely the release is the release relating to FE rather than anything else! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 3 18:56:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2006 13:56:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213907] Review Request: tclpro - Tcl debugging environment In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611031856.kA3Ium65030189@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tclpro - Tcl debugging environment Alias: tclpro https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213907 paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 3 18:57:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2006 13:57:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213596] Review Request: tclcompiler - Tcl bytecode compiler In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611031857.kA3IvUcA030229@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tclcompiler - Tcl bytecode compiler Alias: tclcompiler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213596 paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 3 18:58:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2006 13:58:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213595] Review Request: tbcload - Tcl bytecode loader In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611031858.kA3IwKAg030278@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tbcload - Tcl bytecode loader Alias: tbcload https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213595 paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 3 19:00:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2006 14:00:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213596] Review Request: tclcompiler - Tcl bytecode compiler In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611031900.kA3J0sNC030653@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tclcompiler - Tcl bytecode compiler Alias: tclcompiler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213596 paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 3 19:02:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2006 14:02:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213904] Review Request: tclchecker - Tcl syntax checker In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611031902.kA3J2s0E030921@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tclchecker - Tcl syntax checker Alias: tclchecker https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213904 paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 3 19:03:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2006 14:03:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213906] Review Request: Pound - a reverse proxy and load balancer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611031903.kA3J3qD1031129@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Pound - a reverse proxy and load balancer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213906 paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 3 19:05:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2006 14:05:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213902] Review Request: tclparser - Tcl syntax parser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611031905.kA3J5OaS031298@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tclparser - Tcl syntax parser Alias: tclparser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213902 paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 3 19:06:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2006 14:06:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213905] Review Request: tcldebugger - Tcl debugging library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611031906.kA3J6w0N031460@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tcldebugger - Tcl debugging library Alias: tcldebugger https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213905 paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 3 19:09:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2006 14:09:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213907] Review Request: tclpro - Tcl debugging environment In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611031909.kA3J9tTg031756@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tclpro - Tcl debugging environment Alias: tclpro https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213907 ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2006-11-03 14:09 EST ------- I have been using it in my own private repo for about a year now, and thought it would be easier to 'upgrade' to the FE package once it was approved if I bumped the release instead of resetting it to 1. Release digits are cheap, so I hoped it wouldn't be a problem. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 3 21:01:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2006 16:01:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 205755] Review Request: elsa - manages group of processes and allows accounting In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611032101.kA3L1M88008993@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: elsa - manages group of processes and allows accounting https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205755 ------- Additional Comments From konradr at redhat.com 2006-11-03 16:01 EST ------- Ville, I had no idea that such package even existed. And you are correct: [konrad at dyn448114 ~]$ rpm -qi kernel-devel | tail -2 This package provides kernel headers and makefiles sufficient to build modules against the kernel package. So I tried to install the kernel-headers and no luck on FC5. That package is one the FC6 kernels though. Time to upgrade to FC6 for me :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 4 00:22:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2006 19:22:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 203520] Review Request: evolution-brutus In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611040022.kA40MlC9020743@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: evolution-brutus Alias: evolution-brutus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203520 ------- Additional Comments From colding at omesc.com 2006-11-03 19:22 EST ------- (In reply to comment #48) > 2nd review of this package: > > A. From http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines : > > * Use rpmlint > rpmlint is not yet silent. > --------------------------------------------------------- > W: evolution-brutus devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/libBrutusd-1.0.so > W: evolution-brutus devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/libBrutus-1.0.so > W: evolution-brutus devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/libBrutusPROXY-1.0.so > W: evolution-brutus devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/libBrutusSTUBS-1.0.so > W: evolution-brutus devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/libBrutusSKELS-1.0.so > --------------------------------------------------------- > These files should be in -devel package. Yes, I noticed that rpmlint complained about these files too, but I think it is a faulty error. These libraries are required by evolution-brutus and its helper applications. evolution-brutus would not function if they were absent. They really do not belong in the -devel package so I ignored rpmlint on this one. Am I in error here? > * BuildRequires: > The following BR are redundant. > - libglade2-devel <- this is required by gtkhtml3-devel > <- this is required by evolution-devel OK, fixed. > * Requires: > - For -devel package: > Well, .pc files only includes: > --------------------------------------------------------- > Requires: libIDL-2.0 >= 0.8.5, ORBit-2.0 >= 2.14.1, libBrutusSTUBS-1.0, > libBrutusSKELS-1.0 > Requires: libIDL-2.0 >= 0.8.5, ORBit-2.0 >= 2.14.1, libBrutusSTUBS-1.0 > Requires: libIDL-2.0 >= 0.8.5, ORBit-2.0 >= 2.14.1, libBrutusSTUBS-1.0 > Requires: libIDL-2.0 >= 0.8.5, ORBit-2.0 >= 2.14.1 > Requires: libIDL-2.0 >= 0.8.5, ORBit-2.0 >= 2.14.1, libBrutusSTUBS-1.0 > --------------------------------------------------------- > This usually means that -devel package only requies: > * main package > * pkgconfig > * ORBit2-devel (libIDL-devel is required by ORBit2-devel) > > Would you explain why -devel package requires some extra packages? I would if I could ;-) I think that I confused a require statement with a buildrequire statement. Most of those additional packages are definitely not needed to use an evolution-brutus-devel installation. I've update libBrutus-1.0.pc as applications linking against libBrutus-1.0 would require to link with libecal-1.2 as well. This should otherwise be fixed now I hope. libecal is provided by evolution-data-server-devel so I've kept evolution-data-server-devel in the Require. > - By the way, .pc files includes: > Cflags: -I/lib/glib-2.0/include > This causes no problem (so this is not a blocker), however, this makes > no sense. Agreed, no sense at all. Fixed. > = From http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines: None > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > NOTE: Before being sponsored: > > This package will be accepted with another few work. But before I accept > this package, someone (I am a candidate) should sponsor you. > > Once you are sponsored, you have the right to formally review other > submitters' review request and approve the packages. > For this reason, the person who want to be sponsored (like you) > are required to "show that you have an understanding > of the process and of the packaging guidelines". > > Usually there are two ways to show this. > A. submit other review requests with enough quality. > B. Do a "pre-review" (at the time you are not sponsored, you cannot do > a formal review) of other person's review request. > > Please check the details on > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/HowToGetSponsored Yes, I will attempt to do some pre-reviews. I don't have any other packages at hand so pre-reviews seems the way to go. New files here: SRPM: http://www.omesc.com/content/downloads/dist/Fedora%20Core%20Development/SRPMS/evolution-brutus-1.1.10-1.src.rpm SPEC: http://www.omesc.com/content/downloads/dist/Fedora%20Core%20Development/SPECS/evolution-brutus.spec Thanks, jules -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 4 02:11:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2006 21:11:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 203520] Review Request: evolution-brutus In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611040211.kA42BWSM024094@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: evolution-brutus Alias: evolution-brutus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203520 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-11-03 21:11 EST ------- (In reply to comment #49) > (In reply to comment #48) > > --------------------------------------------------------- > > W: evolution-brutus devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/libBrutusd-1.0.so > > W: evolution-brutus devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/libBrutus-1.0.so > > W: evolution-brutus devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/libBrutusPROXY-1.0.so > > W: evolution-brutus devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/libBrutusSTUBS-1.0.so > > W: evolution-brutus devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/libBrutusSKELS-1.0.so > > --------------------------------------------------------- > > These files should be in -devel package. > > Yes, I noticed that rpmlint complained about these files too, but I think it is > a faulty error. These libraries are required by evolution-brutus and its helper > applications. Really? Applications should require libBrutusPROXY-1.0.so.1, not libBrutusPROXY-1.0.so for runtime. ---------------------------------------------------------------- [tasaka1 at localhost ~]$ ldd -r /usr/bin/brutusd linux-gate.so.1 => (0x00ab3000) libBrutusPROXY-1.0.so.1 => /usr/lib/libBrutusPROXY-1.0.so.1 (0x00bdf000) libBrutusSTUBS-1.0.so.1 => /usr/lib/libBrutusSTUBS-1.0.so.1 (0x05996000) libglib-2.0.so.0 => /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0 (0x00453000) libORBit-2.so.0 => /usr/lib/libORBit-2.so.0 (0x07d21000) libuuid.so.1 => /lib/libuuid.so.1 (0x00101000) libgnome-keyring.so.0 => /usr/lib/libgnome-keyring.so.0 (0x07fd2000) libpthread.so.0 => /lib/libpthread.so.0 (0x002f7000) libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0x00189000) librt.so.1 => /lib/librt.so.1 (0x00448000) libgmodule-2.0.so.0 => /lib/libgmodule-2.0.so.0 (0x00600000) libdl.so.2 => /lib/libdl.so.2 (0x002f1000) libgobject-2.0.so.0 => /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0 (0x004f3000) libgthread-2.0.so.0 => /lib/libgthread-2.0.so.0 (0x00df6000) /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x0016c000) ---------------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 4 03:03:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2006 22:03:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213180] Review Request: tcl-thread - Thread extension for Tcl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611040303.kA433Vws025302@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tcl-thread - Thread extension for Tcl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213180 ------- Additional Comments From jwboyer at jdub.homelinux.org 2006-11-03 22:03 EST ------- Ok, all comments should be fixed. Spec URL: http://jdub.homelinux.org/pub/tcl-thread.spec SRPM URL: http://jdub.homelinux.org/pub/tcl-thread-2.6.5-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 4 03:07:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2006 22:07:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 212513] Review Request: sparse - source code semantec parser used by the Linux kernel In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611040307.kA437MlZ025386@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sparse - source code semantec parser used by the Linux kernel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212513 jwboyer at jdub.homelinux.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jwboyer at jdub.homelinux.org OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 4 03:18:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2006 22:18:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 212513] Review Request: sparse - source code semantec parser used by the Linux kernel In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611040318.kA43IMWY025843@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sparse - source code semantec parser used by the Linux kernel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212513 jwboyer at jdub.homelinux.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jwboyer at jdub.homelinux.org 2006-11-03 22:18 EST ------- GOOD ==== * Package and spec named appropriately: See note below * Spec file is legible and in Am. English * Source matches upstream: See note below * No unnecessary BuildRequires * No locales * No shared libraries in the default linker path * RPM_BUILD_ROOT cleaned where appropriate * Not relocatable * No duplicate %files * File permissions look ok * No need for a -devel subpackage * Not a gui program; no need for a .desktop file * Consistent use of macros * Does not own any directories that it should not own. Note: I've sent an email to the upstream developers discussing a possible official release. If that comes to pass, we can use those for this package. Until then, git or tarball snapshots will work just fine. This package builds fine on ppc. This passes review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 4 05:00:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 4 Nov 2006 00:00:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213193] Review Request: gaim-rhythmbox - Rhythmbox plugin for GAIM In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611040500.kA450jjq032334@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gaim-rhythmbox - Rhythmbox plugin for GAIM https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213193 michel.salim at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From michel.salim at gmail.com 2006-11-04 00:00 EST ------- Thanks! Actually, we missed a Require: on gaim. I'll put it in the next time there's an update, since it should only get triggered if someone 'yum remove' gaim and gaim-rhythmbox does not get removed as well. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 4 06:21:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 4 Nov 2006 01:21:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213193] Review Request: gaim-rhythmbox - Rhythmbox plugin for GAIM In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611040621.kA46L66q001666@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gaim-rhythmbox - Rhythmbox plugin for GAIM https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213193 ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2006-11-04 01:21 EST ------- The Requires: on gaim is picked up automatically: $ rpm -q --requires gaim-rhythmbox | grep gaim libgaim.so.0()(64bit) $ rpm -q --whatprovides 'libgaim.so.0()(64bit)' gaim-2.0.0-0.17.beta4.fc6.x86_64 I also verified this by running 'yum remove gaim' and saw that it would remove gaim-rhythmbox, too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 4 06:21:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 4 Nov 2006 01:21:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213180] Review Request: tcl-thread - Thread extension for Tcl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611040621.kA46Lbv1001699@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tcl-thread - Thread extension for Tcl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213180 wart at kobold.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2006-11-04 01:21 EST ------- Looks good. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 4 07:37:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 4 Nov 2006 02:37:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 211336] Review Request: adesklets - A simple architecture for desktop applets In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611040737.kA47bXph003623@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: adesklets - A simple architecture for desktop applets Alias: adeskets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211336 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-11-04 02:37 EST ------- Okay. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 4 08:28:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 4 Nov 2006 03:28:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 210790] Review Request: dar - Collection of scripts for making/restoring CD/DVD backups In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611040828.kA48S3F3005148@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dar - Collection of scripts for making/restoring CD/DVD backups https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210790 ------- Additional Comments From lists at forevermore.net 2006-11-04 03:28 EST ------- ok, updated files: http://rpm.forevermore.net/dar/dar-2.3.1-2.src.rpm http://rpm.forevermore.net/dar/dar.spec Disabled the static build by default, esp. since the current glibc seems to be broken and won't actually produce a real static binary, anyway. I can't retest this in mock at the moment since I'm still in the middle of setting up fc6, but it should still work fine. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 4 09:16:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 4 Nov 2006 04:16:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 172869] Review Request: nss-mdns In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611040916.kA49GnQh009373@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nss-mdns https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=172869 gauret at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |gauret at free.fr ------- Additional Comments From gauret at free.fr 2006-11-04 04:16 EST ------- I can't download the srpm, could you fix this ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 4 09:30:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 4 Nov 2006 04:30:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 187843] Review Request: phpMyAdmin - Web based MySQL browser written in php In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611040930.kA49UWI7010081@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: phpMyAdmin - Web based MySQL browser written in php https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187843 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2006-11-04 04:30 EST ------- Cross site scripting vulnerability in 2.6.4-2.9.0.2: http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2006-5718 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 4 09:36:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 4 Nov 2006 04:36:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 201636] Review Request: CSpace p2p Instant Messenger In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611040936.kA49aPPu010337@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: CSpace p2p Instant Messenger https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201636 ------- Additional Comments From gauret at free.fr 2006-11-04 04:36 EST ------- Any news on this ? Where is the spec file ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 4 11:14:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 4 Nov 2006 06:14:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213432] Review Request: kaffeine - Xine-based media player In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611041114.kA4BEEVI016305@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kaffeine - Xine-based media player https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213432 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2006-11-04 06:14 EST ------- #001 Isn't it time to merge drop "%{?fedora}" > "2" ? %if "%{?fedora}" > "2" || "%{?rhel}" > "4" %define _with_gstreamer --with-gstreamer %endif I recommend to merge it with %if "%{?fedora}" > "4" || "%{?rhel}" > "4" #002 desktop-file-install \ --vendor="" \ use fedora as vendor :) desktop-file-install --vendor fedora \ #003 README* There is one README file to me. #004 BuildRequires: cdparanoia-devel cdparanoia cdparanoia-devel already requires cdparanoia correct these, I'll approve it as quick as possible #005: can you contact upstream to update their download page http://kaffeine.sourceforge.net/index.php?page=download with respect to fedora. I just want people to have a good fedora KDE image :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 4 12:06:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 4 Nov 2006 07:06:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 211703] Review Request: nyquist - Sound synthesis and composition language with a Lisp syntax In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611041206.kA4C6F8b018517@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nyquist - Sound synthesis and composition language with a Lisp syntax https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211703 gemi at bluewin.ch changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From gemi at bluewin.ch 2006-11-04 07:06 EST ------- Built on FC5, FC6 and FC7. Added entries to owners and comps files. Thanks for the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 4 12:18:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 4 Nov 2006 07:18:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 184011] Review Request: nickle In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611041218.kA4CIeke018960@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nickle https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=184011 ------- Additional Comments From gemi at bluewin.ch 2006-11-04 07:18 EST ------- I think it is enough to have rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT instead of [ "$RPM_BUILD_ROOT" != "/" ] && rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT The examples directory appears twice, once in the docdir and once in /usr/share/nickle. I prefer the docdir. The examples directory contains Makefile* files which are not functional. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 4 13:21:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 4 Nov 2006 08:21:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 203520] Review Request: evolution-brutus In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611041321.kA4DL6tx023333@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: evolution-brutus Alias: evolution-brutus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203520 ------- Additional Comments From colding at omesc.com 2006-11-04 08:21 EST ------- You are right again. I'll fix this when I get back to my office on Monday. Sorry, jules -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 4 14:16:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 4 Nov 2006 09:16:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 203520] Review Request: evolution-brutus In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611041416.kA4EGBmP026818@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: evolution-brutus Alias: evolution-brutus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203520 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-11-04 09:16 EST ------- Okay, however it is highly possible that I cannot check your package re-uploaded until next Thursday (in Japan, EST+14h). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 4 14:19:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 4 Nov 2006 09:19:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 210790] Review Request: dar - Collection of scripts for making/restoring CD/DVD backups In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611041419.kA4EJO01026898@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dar - Collection of scripts for making/restoring CD/DVD backups https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210790 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-11-04 09:19 EST ------- Okay, first full review of this package (dar). Almost okay. 1. From http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines : * rpmlint rpmlint is not silent. W: dar file-not-utf8 /usr/share/man/man1/dar.1.gz dar.1.gz contains ISO-8859-1 character (around the line 341). -------------------------------------------------------------------- This allows one to merge two archive in a single one. See also -$, - and -% for other options concerning auxiliary archive of reference -------------------------------------------------------------------- Please change this character MANUALLY (iconv does not work for this case as this character seems to be tilde, while iconv tries to change this character to English pound character. * Requires: - For libdar-devel Usually the dependency for main package (for this package, it is libdar) is release-specific. i.e. Requires: libdar = %{version}-%{release} - Provides like Provides: libdar = %{version}-%{release} are all unnecessary as rpm always provides these implicitly. * BuildRequires: - Redundant BuildRequires is found. * zlib-devel <- this is required by openssl-devel 2. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines = Nothing. 3. Other things I have noticed: * README.Fedora - Okay, this document is very preferable. Also I recommend you add your name and the date when you wrote this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 4 14:52:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 4 Nov 2006 09:52:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 209261] Review Request: beryl-settings - Beryl OpenGL window and compositing manager GUI config utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611041452.kA4EqdJK028031@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: beryl-settings - Beryl OpenGL window and compositing manager GUI config utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209261 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2006-11-04 09:52 EST ------- chitlesh[0]$rpm -qf /usr/bin/beryl-settings beryl-settings-0.1.1-2.fc6 chitlesh[0]$cat /usr/share/applications/fedora-beryl-settings.desktop [Desktop Entry] Encoding=UTF-8 Name=Beryl Settings Manager Comment=Configure beryl Icon=/usr/share/pixmaps/beryl-settings.png Exec=beryl-settings Terminal=false Type=Application Categories=Settings;X-Fedora; X-Desktop-File-Install-Version=0.10 chitlesh[0]$ls /usr/share/pixmaps/beryl-settings.png ls: /usr/share/pixmaps/beryl-settings.png: No such file or directory Hence no icon on kmenu ! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 4 16:09:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 4 Nov 2006 11:09:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213193] Review Request: gaim-rhythmbox - Rhythmbox plugin for GAIM In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611041609.kA4G92Aj030487@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gaim-rhythmbox - Rhythmbox plugin for GAIM https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213193 ------- Additional Comments From michel.salim at gmail.com 2006-11-04 11:08 EST ------- Bizarre, that does not appear on my system when using mock to build the package. When /not/ using mock the dependency appears properly.. I'll wait for the FE result to comes out and reverify. % rpm -q gaim-rhythmbox gaim-rhythmbox-2.0-0.4.beta4.fc6 % rpm -q --requires gaim-rhythmbox | grep gaim % -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 4 16:36:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 4 Nov 2006 11:36:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 184011] Review Request: nickle In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611041636.kA4Ga4Mm030943@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nickle https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=184011 ------- Additional Comments From michel.salim at gmail.com 2006-11-04 11:35 EST ------- http://hircus.org/fedora/nickle/nickle-2.54-2.src.rpm http://hircus.org/fedora/nickle/nickle.spec Fixed, thanks. Note that the two left-over COPYING files in %{_docdir}/examples are there because they cite different authors than the main COPYING file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 4 16:40:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 4 Nov 2006 11:40:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 199108] Review Request: gutenprint: Printer Drivers Package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611041640.kA4Ge55Y031465@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gutenprint: Printer Drivers Package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199108 gbcox at bzb.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |gbcox at bzb.us ------- Additional Comments From gbcox at bzb.us 2006-11-04 11:39 EST ------- I've installed the packages on extras and everything appears to be working fine with the exception of replacement of the gimp-print plugin. I tried removing the gimp-print-plugin provided in FC6 core, but then realized their doesn't appear to be an rpm available to replace it. Is one in the works, or is this deferred to FC7? Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 4 16:43:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 4 Nov 2006 11:43:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213432] Review Request: kaffeine - Xine-based media player In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611041643.kA4GhOrH031656@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kaffeine - Xine-based media player https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213432 michel.salim at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |michel.salim at gmail.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From michel.salim at gmail.com 2006-11-04 11:43 EST ------- Chitlesh, remember to move the bug to the FE-REVIEW tracker -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 4 16:49:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 4 Nov 2006 11:49:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213432] Review Request: kaffeine - Xine-based media player In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611041649.kA4GnFhR031786@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kaffeine - Xine-based media player https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213432 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-11-04 11:49 EST ------- > #002 > desktop-file-install \ > --vendor="" \ > use fedora as vendor :) > desktop-file-install --vendor fedora \ The packaging guidelines were recently changed to not override upstream vendor (kde in this case). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 4 16:53:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 4 Nov 2006 11:53:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213432] Review Request: kaffeine - Xine-based media player In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611041653.kA4GrOMd031960@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kaffeine - Xine-based media player https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213432 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-11-04 11:53 EST ------- > #004 > BuildRequires: cdparanoia-devel cdparanoia > cdparanoia-devel already requires cdparanoia Check again. (: Last I checked, cdparanoia-devel only Req'd cdparanoia-libs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 4 16:55:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 4 Nov 2006 11:55:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213432] Review Request: kaffeine - Xine-based media player In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611041655.kA4GtM8e032053@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kaffeine - Xine-based media player https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213432 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-11-04 11:55 EST ------- > #001 > Isn't it time to merge drop "%{?fedora}" > "2" ? I could, buy why? It's not wrong. changing to fedora > 4 isn't as correct and misleads one to think that only 4+ is supported. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 4 16:59:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 4 Nov 2006 11:59:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213432] Review Request: kaffeine - Xine-based media player In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611041659.kA4GxQgk032237@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kaffeine - Xine-based media player https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213432 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2006-11-04 11:59 EST ------- > Check again. (: Last I checked, cdparanoia-devel only Req'd cdparanoia-libs. Ok, you are right about it > I could, buy why? It's not wrong. changing to fedora > 4 isn't as correct and misleads one to think that only 4+ is supported. Is kaffeine intended to be for fc4 and below ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 4 17:01:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 4 Nov 2006 12:01:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213906] Review Request: Pound - a reverse proxy and load balancer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611041701.kA4H1vwQ032329@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Pound - a reverse proxy and load balancer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213906 gauret at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |gauret at free.fr ------- Additional Comments From gauret at free.fr 2006-11-04 12:01 EST ------- Needswork : - Do not repeat the name in the Summary - Please create an init script for pound (you can base it on /etc/init.d/transparent-proxying in the squidGuard package for example) - Please make a default config file for /etc/pound.cfg, with a very basic setup (like the second example in the pound(8) man page), but with the control socket and running as a different user -> This implies that you create a directory for Pound's control sockets, for example /var/lib/pound, and that you own it in the rpm -> It also implies that you create a pound user in %pre, see the Zope package for an example) Possible improvements: - Generate a dummy SSL cert in /etc/pki/tls/certs/pound.pem, you can look at the %post script in the openldap-servers package for a way to do it. - Add an SELinux policy, but that's a bit more complicated -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 4 17:09:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 4 Nov 2006 12:09:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 199108] Review Request: gutenprint: Printer Drivers Package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611041709.kA4H9Foq032535@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gutenprint: Printer Drivers Package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199108 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-11-04 12:09 EST ------- (In reply to comment #90) > I've installed the packages on extras and everything appears to be working fine > with the exception of replacement of the gimp-print plugin. I tried removing > the gimp-print-plugin provided in FC6 core, but then realized their doesn't > appear to be an rpm available to replace it. Is one in the works, or is this > deferred to FC7? Thanks! yes extras version of gutenprint is meant for parallel installation of old gimp-print package along with new gutenprint package. Check more in gutenprint's SPEC file about what is set for FC7 and what excluded in extras. http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/rpms/gutenprint/devel/gutenprint.spec?root=extras&view=markup -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 4 17:21:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 4 Nov 2006 12:21:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 209311] Review Request: espeak - Software speech synthesizer (text-to-speech) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611041721.kA4HLHO7000719@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: espeak - Software speech synthesizer (text-to-speech) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209311 ------- Additional Comments From faucamp at csir.co.za 2006-11-04 12:21 EST ------- New build: Spec URL: http://dialogpalette.sourceforge.net/extras/fedora/espeak.spec SRPM URL: http://dialogpalette.sourceforge.net/extras/fedora/espeak-1.16-3.src.rpm Changes: - Fixed source file permissions for -debuginfo package in %prep - Added RPM_OPT_FLAGS to "make" command in %build; removed RPM_OPT_FLAGS makefile patch - Modified makefile install target patch to include general support for setting compiler optimization flags via CXXFLAGS - Removed creation of .orig backup files during patching - Modified patch files to have different suffixes This time, rpmlint is truly silent ;-) I'm not too sure what you mean by "different suffixes" for different patch files; I've resorted to using a suffix corresponding to the patch ID number in the spec (e.g. somefile.patch0). Thanks for the feedback! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 4 17:29:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 4 Nov 2006 12:29:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 209311] Review Request: espeak - Software speech synthesizer (text-to-speech) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611041729.kA4HTnGE001401@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: espeak - Software speech synthesizer (text-to-speech) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209311 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-11-04 12:29 EST ------- Well, what I meant was adding some different suffixes each time you apply patches are preferred and I didn't meant you have to change the name of the patches. Like: %patch0 -p1 -b .pthread %patch1 -p1 -b .install_target %patch2 -p1 -b .sizeof ........ to make it easy that you can check how the patches were applied afterwards. (I have not yet rebuilt the srpm you re-uploaded -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 4 18:46:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 4 Nov 2006 13:46:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213662] Review Request: openmpi - Upstream MPI package with native InfiniBand support In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611041846.kA4IkxIq006205@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: openmpi - Upstream MPI package with native InfiniBand support https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213662 dakingun at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dakingun at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From dakingun at gmail.com 2006-11-04 13:46 EST ------- Oops, sorry I don't understand this; last time I checked openmpi was bundled with FC6 and has been in devel (rawhide) for a little while. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 4 20:22:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 4 Nov 2006 15:22:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214024] New: Review Request: perl-Net-DBus - Net::DBus Perl module Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214024 Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-DBus - Net::DBus Perl module Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Net-DBus/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com SRPM URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-Net-DBus-0.33.3-1.fc6.src.rpm SPEC URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-Net-DBus.spec Description: Net::DBus provides a Perl API for the DBus message system. The DBus Perl interface is currently operating against the 0.32 development version of DBus, but should work with later versions too, providing the API changes have not been too drastic. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 4 20:22:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 4 Nov 2006 15:22:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214024] Review Request: perl-Net-DBus - Net::DBus Perl module In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611042022.kA4KMjSW009243@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-DBus - Net::DBus Perl module https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214024 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |163776 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 4 20:23:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 4 Nov 2006 15:23:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214025] New: Review Request: Tracker - An object database, tag/metadata database, search tool and indexer Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214025 Summary: Review Request: Tracker - An object database, tag/metadata database, search tool and indexer Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: dakingun at gmail.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: ftp://czar.eas.yorku.ca/pub/tracker/tracker.spec SRPM URL: ftp://czar.eas.yorku.ca/pub/tracker/tracker-0.5.0-1.src.rpm Description: Tracker is a powerful desktop-neutral first class object database, tag/metadata database, search tool and indexer. Tracker is also extremely fast and super efficient with your systems memory when compared with some other competing frameworks and is by far the fastest and most memory efficient Nautilus search and Deskbar backends currently availble. It consists of a common object database that allows entities to have an almost infinte number of properties, metadata (both embedded/harvested as well as user definable), a comprehensive database of keywords/tags and links to other entities. It provides additional features for file based objects including context linking and audit trails for a file object. It has the ability to index, store, harvest metadata. retrieve and search all types of files and other first class objects. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 4 22:17:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 4 Nov 2006 17:17:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214025] Review Request: Tracker - An object database, tag/metadata database, search tool and indexer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611042217.kA4MHEsU013333@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Tracker - An object database, tag/metadata database, search tool and indexer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214025 michel.salim at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |michel.salim at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From michel.salim at gmail.com 2006-11-04 17:17 EST ------- Where did you get tracker 0.5.0 from? Upstream has only 0.0.4, and the URL listed in the spec file does not work. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 4 22:20:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 4 Nov 2006 17:20:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214025] Review Request: Tracker - An object database, tag/metadata database, search tool and indexer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611042220.kA4MKod1013424@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Tracker - An object database, tag/metadata database, search tool and indexer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214025 michel.salim at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |michel.salim at gmail.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From michel.salim at gmail.com 2006-11-04 17:20 EST ------- Uh, nevermind, I typed in 0.0.5 by mistake. Jamie really should update the Tracker website as well. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 4 22:58:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 4 Nov 2006 17:58:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214025] Review Request: Tracker - An object database, tag/metadata database, search tool and indexer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611042258.kA4MwlTH015112@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Tracker - An object database, tag/metadata database, search tool and indexer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214025 gauret at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |gauret at free.fr ------- Additional Comments From gauret at free.fr 2006-11-04 17:58 EST ------- I had started to review it, but if you want to do it, here's what I found out so far: Needs work: * Missing SMP flags. If it doesn't build with it, please add a comment (wiki: PackagingGuidelines#parallelmake) * Build failed in mock. Missing BR: pango-devel, dbus-devel, dbus-glib * Missing BR for metadata extractors : libgnomeui-devel, gnome-vfs2-devel, gnome-desktop-devel, poppler, libvorbis-devel, libpng-devel, libexif-devel, libgsf-devel Possible improvements : * Have trackerd start on login with a desktop file in /usr/share/gnome/autostart/ (GNOME) and in /usr/share/autostart/ (KDE) Is there a freedesktop spec for this by the way ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 4 23:14:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 4 Nov 2006 18:14:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214025] Review Request: Tracker - An object database, tag/metadata database, search tool and indexer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611042314.kA4NEDPS015412@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Tracker - An object database, tag/metadata database, search tool and indexer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214025 ------- Additional Comments From michel.salim at gmail.com 2006-11-04 18:14 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=140370) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=140370&action=view) Diff to tracker.spec Weird, the package I downloaded has libexif-devel, libgsf-devel etc. as BuildRequires. pango-devel is not required as it's pulled in by gnome-desktop-devel. Missing BuildRequires: dbus-devel dbus-glib-devel gnome-utils-devel libpng-devel openssl-devel Description has some misspelled words, and summary should not end in '.'; also, since libraries are included you need to call ldconfig on %post and %postun Do we want to split the libraries into separate packages? Actually, Aurelien, you can take over the review if you want. I'm less familiar with autostarting. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 4 23:15:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 4 Nov 2006 18:15:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214025] Review Request: Tracker - An object database, tag/metadata database, search tool and indexer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611042315.kA4NF8hU015450@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Tracker - An object database, tag/metadata database, search tool and indexer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214025 ------- Additional Comments From michel.salim at gmail.com 2006-11-04 18:15 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=140371) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=140371&action=view) New tracker.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 4 23:25:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 4 Nov 2006 18:25:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214025] Review Request: Tracker - An object database, tag/metadata database, search tool and indexer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611042325.kA4NPtOq015697@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Tracker - An object database, tag/metadata database, search tool and indexer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214025 ------- Additional Comments From dakingun at gmail.com 2006-11-04 18:25 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > I had started to review it, but if you want to do it, here's what I found out so > far: > > Needs work: > * Missing SMP flags. If it doesn't build with it, please add a comment > (wiki: PackagingGuidelines#parallelmake) > * Build failed in mock. Missing BR: pango-devel, dbus-devel, dbus-glib > * Missing BR for metadata extractors : libgnomeui-devel, gnome-vfs2-devel, > gnome-desktop-devel, poppler, libvorbis-devel, libpng-devel, libexif-devel, > libgsf-devel > Really me culpa. After I initially uploaded the src.rpm, I realized I had not tested it in mock, so I quickly updated the files (without bumping the version) thinking no one is reviewing yet. Updated files are here; Spec URL: ftp://czar.eas.yorku.ca/pub/tracker/tracker.spec SRPM URL: ftp://czar.eas.yorku.ca/pub/tracker/tracker-0.5.0-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 5 00:04:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 4 Nov 2006 19:04:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214025] Review Request: Tracker - An object database, tag/metadata database, search tool and indexer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611050004.kA504bBY017022@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Tracker - An object database, tag/metadata database, search tool and indexer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214025 ------- Additional Comments From dakingun at gmail.com 2006-11-04 19:04 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > Created an attachment (id=140370) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=140370&action=view) [edit] > Diff to tracker.spec > > Weird, the package I downloaded has libexif-devel, libgsf-devel etc. as > BuildRequires. pango-devel is not required as it's pulled in by > gnome-desktop-devel. > > Missing BuildRequires: > dbus-devel dbus-glib-devel gnome-utils-devel libpng-devel openssl-devel > Most of these are already pulled in by other dependencies. But why is gnome-utils-devel and openssl-devel needed, I can't find anything in the configure log that that suggest they are > Description has some misspelled words, and summary should not end in '.'; also, Gone thru and corrected a bunch (I had copied it directly from the README). > since libraries are included you need to call ldconfig on %post and %postun > Done. > Do we want to split the libraries into separate packages? > > Actually, Aurelien, you can take over the review if you want. I'm less familiar > with autostarting. > I've also commented the build fails with the smp flags. I'll work on the autostarting stuff tomorrow. Thanks for reviewing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 5 01:57:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 4 Nov 2006 20:57:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214025] Review Request: Tracker - An object database, tag/metadata database, search tool and indexer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611050157.kA51vFaM020162@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Tracker - An object database, tag/metadata database, search tool and indexer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214025 ------- Additional Comments From michel.salim at gmail.com 2006-11-04 20:57 EST ------- I found them by calling ./configure --help and looking at the options that can be specified. It's probably not accurate, since it missed certain things that configure actually checks for. Will look at it again tomorrow. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 5 08:11:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Nov 2006 03:11:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214055] New: Review Request: scummvm - Interpreter for several adventure games Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214055 Summary: Review Request: scummvm - Interpreter for several adventure games Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/scummvm.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/scummvm-0.9.1-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: ScummVM is an implementation of the SCUMM (Script Creation Utility for Maniac Mansion) engine used in various Lucas Arts games such as Monkey Island and Day of the Tentacle. At this time ScummVM should be considered ALPHA software, as it's still under heavy development. Be aware that while many games will work with few major bugs, crashes can happen. Also note that saved games can, and probably will, be incompatible between releases. Also ScummVM is capable of playing several non-SCUMM games. --- As discussed on f-e-l, scummvm is moving from Livna to FE since there have been released two Free games for it. There is one downside to being in FE. I've had to disable mp3 and mpeg2 video support. mp3 support is not a problem since scummvm also supports ogg and the involved media packs are available in both ogg and mp3 format. However the loose of mpeg2 video playback is unfortunate as that means that the cutscenes in the Broken Sword game cannot be played. I believe this is a small disadvantage as it influences only one game and that the advantages of being in FE outway this disadvantage. I'll request upstream to add theora support and to also provide theora versions of the involved media packs fixing this. I'll also be submitting several game packages for scumm today and I'll add their bug numbers to this bug, so you will have something to test with when reviewing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 5 08:25:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Nov 2006 03:25:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214057] New: Review Request: beneath-a-steel-sky - Beneath a Steel Sky - Adventure Game Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214057 Summary: Review Request: beneath-a-steel-sky - Beneath a Steel Sky - Adventure Game Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/beneath-a-steel-sky.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/beneath-a-steel-sky-0.0348-1.src.rpm Description: After the Dungeons and Dragons fantasy setting of Revolution's first game, Lure of the Temptress, Revolution decided to go down a completely different avenue with its second adventure game, Beneath a Steel Sky, that of Science Fiction. A bleak vision of the future was imagined, where mind control and medical science combined forces to repress the populace. Leading comic artist, Dave Gibbons, joined the design team to visualise this desperate landscape. The result is the cult classic Beneath a Steel Sky. Notice that this package contains the floppy version, the CD version is also available in the %{name}-cd package. The CD version contains additional / longer cutscenes and voice acting, but also is much larger: the CD version ways in at 70 MB where as this version is only 8 MB. --- Note that this package requires scummvm, whose review request is here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214055 I'll also be submitting the cd version sometime today. See the scummvm review for all scummvm games which I'm submitting. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 5 08:27:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Nov 2006 03:27:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214055] Review Request: scummvm - Interpreter for several adventure games In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611050827.kA58R8aJ029358@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scummvm - Interpreter for several adventure games https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214055 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-11-05 03:26 EST ------- Beneath a Steel Sky (floppy version) review is in bug 214057 . -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 5 08:27:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Nov 2006 03:27:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214057] Review Request: beneath-a-steel-sky - Beneath a Steel Sky - Adventure Game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611050827.kA58RbXM029374@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: beneath-a-steel-sky - Beneath a Steel Sky - Adventure Game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214057 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |214055 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 5 08:27:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Nov 2006 03:27:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214055] Review Request: scummvm - Interpreter for several adventure games In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611050827.kA58RmRu029388@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scummvm - Interpreter for several adventure games https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214055 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |214057 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 5 09:19:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Nov 2006 04:19:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214055] Review Request: scummvm - Interpreter for several adventure games In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611050919.kA59Jj7U001300@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scummvm - Interpreter for several adventure games https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214055 opensource at till.name changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |opensource at till.name ------- Additional Comments From opensource at till.name 2006-11-05 04:19 EST ------- Why is configure invoked with "--disable-fluidsynth"? Fluidsynth is available in Extras. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 5 12:01:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Nov 2006 07:01:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214055] Review Request: scummvm - Interpreter for several adventure games In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611051201.kA5C13wS029146@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scummvm - Interpreter for several adventure games https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214055 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-11-05 07:01 EST ------- Because it can also use fluidsynth through alsa and I didn't want to drag it in as a dep. Especially since fluidsynth needs a good free GM soundfont2 file, which currently is not available in FE AFAIK. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 5 14:08:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Nov 2006 09:08:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 209311] Review Request: espeak - Software speech synthesizer (text-to-speech) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611051408.kA5E8FAQ003926@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: espeak - Software speech synthesizer (text-to-speech) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209311 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-11-05 09:08 EST ------- Well, it seems that I cannot access http://dialogpalette.sourceforge.net/. Note: I will be busy till this Thursday (in Japan: EST+14h) and I may not be able to check your srpm by that day. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 5 14:09:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Nov 2006 09:09:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 211336] Review Request: adesklets - A simple architecture for desktop applets In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611051409.kA5E9K4K004025@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: adesklets - A simple architecture for desktop applets Alias: adeskets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211336 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-11-05 09:09 EST ------- Note: I will be busy till this Thursday (in Japan: EST+14h) and I may not be able to check your srpm by that day. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 5 15:01:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Nov 2006 10:01:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214025] Review Request: Tracker - An object database, tag/metadata database, search tool and indexer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611051501.kA5F1B5L005928@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Tracker - An object database, tag/metadata database, search tool and indexer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214025 ------- Additional Comments From gauret at free.fr 2006-11-05 10:01 EST ------- According to http://standards.freedesktop.org/autostart-spec/autostart-spec-latest.html the directory for autostarting applications is /etc/xdg/autostart. You have to put a desktop file in it. On my computer, tracker starts up and indexes stuff. When I search using tracker-search, it gives some results, but sometimes it gives no results when I'm searching for something I know I have. Any idea why ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 5 16:53:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Nov 2006 11:53:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214087] New: Review Request: libextractor -- Simple library for keyword extraction Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214087 Summary: Review Request: libextractor -- Simple library for keyword extraction Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: enrico.scholz at informatik.tu-chemnitz.de QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://ensc.de/fedora/libextractor/ SRPM URL: http://ensc.de/fedora/libextractor/ Description: libextractor is a simple library for keyword extraction. libextractor does not support all formats but supports a simple plugging mechanism such that you can quickly add extractors for additional formats, even without recompiling libextractor. libextractor typically ships with a dozen helper-libraries that can be used to obtain keywords from common file-types. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 5 17:15:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Nov 2006 12:15:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214091] New: Review Request: beneath-a-steel-sky-cd - Beneath a Steel Sky - Adventure Game - CD version Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214091 Summary: Review Request: beneath-a-steel-sky-cd - Beneath a Steel Sky - Adventure Game - CD version Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/beneath-a-steel-sky-cd.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/beneath-a-steel-sky-cd-0.0372-1.src.rpm Description: After the Dungeons and Dragons fantasy setting of Revolution's first game, Lure of the Temptress, Revolution decided to go down a completely different avenue with its second adventure game, Beneath a Steel Sky, that of Science Fiction. A bleak vision of the future was imagined, where mind control and medical science combined forces to repress the populace. Leading comic artist, Dave Gibbons, joined the design team to visualise this desperate landscape. The result is the cult classic Beneath a Steel Sky. This package contains the CD version, which contains additional / longer cutscenes and voice acting, but also is much larger: 70 MB where as the also available floppy version (package name beneath-a-steel-sky) is only 8 MB. --- Note that this package requires scummvm, whose review request is here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214055 I'll also submitted the floppy version for review as bug 214057 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 5 17:16:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Nov 2006 12:16:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214091] Review Request: beneath-a-steel-sky-cd - Beneath a Steel Sky - Adventure Game - CD version In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611051716.kA5HGivQ014239@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: beneath-a-steel-sky-cd - Beneath a Steel Sky - Adventure Game - CD version https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214091 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |214055 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 5 17:16:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Nov 2006 12:16:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214055] Review Request: scummvm - Interpreter for several adventure games In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611051716.kA5HGlKr014248@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scummvm - Interpreter for several adventure games https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214055 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |214091 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 5 17:18:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Nov 2006 12:18:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214055] Review Request: scummvm - Interpreter for several adventure games In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611051718.kA5HIWSY014404@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scummvm - Interpreter for several adventure games https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214055 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-11-05 12:18 EST ------- And Beneath a Steel Sky (CD version) review is in bug 214091. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 5 17:35:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Nov 2006 12:35:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 212883] Review Request: php-pear-Net-URL - Easy parsing of URLs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611051735.kA5HZI8u015488@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Net-URL - Easy parsing of URLs Alias: php-pear-Net-URL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212883 Fedora at FamilleCollet.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |Fedora at FamilleCollet.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 5 17:35:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Nov 2006 12:35:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 212883] Review Request: php-pear-Net-URL - Easy parsing of URLs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611051735.kA5HZnr8015537@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Net-URL - Easy parsing of URLs Alias: php-pear-Net-URL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212883 Fedora at FamilleCollet.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 5 17:40:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Nov 2006 12:40:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 212883] Review Request: php-pear-Net-URL - Easy parsing of URLs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611051740.kA5HetCl016327@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Net-URL - Easy parsing of URLs Alias: php-pear-Net-URL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212883 ------- Additional Comments From Fedora at FamilleCollet.com 2006-11-05 12:40 EST ------- Sorry, i've been a long time without looking at the packages waiting for review... And i need this one, so i began to review some of them. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 5 17:46:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Nov 2006 12:46:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214025] Review Request: Tracker - An object database, tag/metadata database, search tool and indexer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611051746.kA5HkQ63016791@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Tracker - An object database, tag/metadata database, search tool and indexer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214025 ------- Additional Comments From rmy at pobox.com 2006-11-05 12:46 EST ------- mikmod obsoletes tracker. Has done since it was introduced in Red Hat 5.2. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 5 18:02:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Nov 2006 13:02:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214025] Review Request: Tracker - An object database, tag/metadata database, search tool and indexer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611051802.kA5I2YXM018012@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Tracker - An object database, tag/metadata database, search tool and indexer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214025 ------- Additional Comments From gauret at free.fr 2006-11-05 13:02 EST ------- Good catch ! A bug should be filled against mikmod and the obsoletes removed IMHO. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 5 18:09:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Nov 2006 13:09:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 212883] Review Request: php-pear-Net-URL - Easy parsing of URLs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611051809.kA5I9RaK018550@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Net-URL - Easy parsing of URLs Alias: php-pear-Net-URL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212883 ------- Additional Comments From Fedora at FamilleCollet.com 2006-11-05 13:09 EST ------- * source files match upstream: 4be5ac05dc5a9bc54a33cec66d87eb0a SOURCES/Net_URL-1.0.14.tgz * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * dist tag is present. * build root is correct. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development). * package installs properly * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: php-pear(Net_URL) = 1.0.14 php-pear-Net-URL = 1.0.14-1.fc7 * %check is not present; no test suite provide. * owns the directories it creates (Net already owned but by non-dependant rpm) * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * scriptlets are OK (pear install) * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. APPROVED What do you think of adding CHANGELOG to the %doc (have a look at the xml2changelod i used on my rpm) ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 5 18:10:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Nov 2006 13:10:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 212883] Review Request: php-pear-Net-URL - Easy parsing of URLs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611051810.kA5IA2cN018604@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Net-URL - Easy parsing of URLs Alias: php-pear-Net-URL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212883 Fedora at FamilleCollet.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 5 18:12:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Nov 2006 13:12:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 212885] Review Request: php-pear-HTTP-Request - Provides an easy way to perform HTTP requests In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611051812.kA5ICJYC018792@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-HTTP-Request - Provides an easy way to perform HTTP requests Alias: pear-HTTP-Request https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212885 Fedora at FamilleCollet.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |Fedora at FamilleCollet.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 5 18:13:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Nov 2006 13:13:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 212885] Review Request: php-pear-HTTP-Request - Provides an easy way to perform HTTP requests In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611051813.kA5IDYB9018889@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-HTTP-Request - Provides an easy way to perform HTTP requests Alias: pear-HTTP-Request https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212885 Fedora at FamilleCollet.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 5 18:23:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Nov 2006 13:23:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 186452] Review Request: kdebluetooth: The KDE Bluetooth Framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611051823.kA5INVPx019148@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdebluetooth: The KDE Bluetooth Framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=186452 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2006-11-05 13:23 EST ------- Rex, ping? See comments 13, 22 and 23. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 5 18:32:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Nov 2006 13:32:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 212885] Review Request: php-pear-HTTP-Request - Provides an easy way to perform HTTP requests In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611051832.kA5IW35a019362@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-HTTP-Request - Provides an easy way to perform HTTP requests Alias: pear-HTTP-Request https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212885 ------- Additional Comments From Fedora at FamilleCollet.com 2006-11-05 13:32 EST ------- * source files match upstream: 2aacf8ac8ce9aa865269f6b5e4c256b9 HTTP_Request-1.4.0.tgz * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * dist tag is present. * build root is correct. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible (BSD). * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development). * package installs properly * rpmlint is silent. * final provides are sane: php-pear(HTTP_Request) = 1.4.0 php-pear-HTTP-Request = 1.4.0-1.fc7 * %check is not present; no test suite provide. * owns the directories it creates (HTTP already owned but by non-dependant rpm) * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * scriptlets are OK (pear install) * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. SHOULD requires other extensions with minimal version. php-pear(Net_URL) >= 1.0.12 php-pear(Net_Socket) >= 1.0.2 php-pear(PEAR) >= 1.4.0b1 APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 5 18:32:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Nov 2006 13:32:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 212885] Review Request: php-pear-HTTP-Request - Provides an easy way to perform HTTP requests In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611051832.kA5IWLlR019375@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-HTTP-Request - Provides an easy way to perform HTTP requests Alias: pear-HTTP-Request https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212885 Fedora at FamilleCollet.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 5 18:43:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Nov 2006 13:43:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214025] Review Request: Tracker - An object database, tag/metadata database, search tool and indexer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611051843.kA5IhTuj020159@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Tracker - An object database, tag/metadata database, search tool and indexer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214025 ------- Additional Comments From gauret at free.fr 2006-11-05 13:43 EST ------- OK, I found this mail : http://mail.gnome.org/archives/tracker-list/2006-November/msg00001.html which explains my bug. FC-5 sqlite is not compiled with --enable-threadsafe, while FC-6 sqlite is. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 5 18:47:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Nov 2006 13:47:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214025] Review Request: Tracker - An object database, tag/metadata database, search tool and indexer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611051847.kA5IlPGM020358@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Tracker - An object database, tag/metadata database, search tool and indexer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214025 ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2006-11-05 13:47 EST ------- i'd leave the advertisement (the complete second paragraph) out of the deskcription. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 5 19:28:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Nov 2006 14:28:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214106] New: Review Request: php-pear-Net-FTP - Provides an OO interface to the PHP FTP functions plus some additions Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214106 Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Net-FTP - Provides an OO interface to the PHP FTP functions plus some additions Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: Fedora at FamilleCollet.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://remi.collet.free.fr/rpms/extras/php-pear-Net-FTP.spec SRPM URL: http://remi.collet.free.fr/rpms/extras/php-pear-Net-FTP-1.3.2-1.fc6.src.rpm Mock Log: http://remi.collet.free.fr/rpms/extras/php-pear-Net-FTP-build.log Description: Net_FTP allows you to communicate with FTP servers in a more comfortable way than the native FTP functions of PHP do. The class implements everything nativly supported by PHP and additionally features like recursive up- and downloading, dircreation and chmodding. It although implements an observer pattern to allow for example the view of a progress bar. Package required by php-pear-Service-Weather, comming soon to review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 5 20:20:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Nov 2006 15:20:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214113] New: Review Request: flight-of-the-amazon-queen - Flight of the Amazon Queen - Adventure Game Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214113 Summary: Review Request: flight-of-the-amazon-queen - Flight of the Amazon Queen - Adventure Game Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/flight-of-the-amazon-queen.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/flight-of-the-amazon-queen-1.0-1.src.rpm Description: It is 1949 and you play Joe King, pilot for hire with his small private plane the 'Amazon Queen'. The game is a spoof of old timey radio adventure serials, and as it begins we find Joe in one of those typical situations. It is 11:58 and 36 seconds and counting, Joe and his date are tied up in an abandoned warehouse ("you really know how to show a girl a good time, Joe!"), and a bomb is set to go off at midnight! Of course they escape, in the nick of time, and immediately set us up for the next 'adventure'. Joe suddenly remembers that he is scheduled to fly the famous movie star, Faye Russell, to a photo shoot in the Amazon jungle the next morning. Notice that this package contains the floppy version, the CD version is also available in the %{name}-cd package. The CD version contains additional / longer cutscenes and voice acting, but also is much larger: the CD version ways in at 37 MB where as this version is only 7 MB. --- Note that this package requires scummvm, whose review request is here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214055 I'll also be submitting the cd version sometime this week. See the scummvm review for all scummvm games which I'm submitting. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 5 20:21:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Nov 2006 15:21:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214113] Review Request: flight-of-the-amazon-queen - Flight of the Amazon Queen - Adventure Game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611052021.kA5KL9rw024337@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: flight-of-the-amazon-queen - Flight of the Amazon Queen - Adventure Game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214113 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |214055 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 5 20:21:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Nov 2006 15:21:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214055] Review Request: scummvm - Interpreter for several adventure games In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611052021.kA5KLJVv024346@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scummvm - Interpreter for several adventure games https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214055 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |214113 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 5 20:40:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Nov 2006 15:40:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214055] Review Request: scummvm - Interpreter for several adventure games In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611052040.kA5Kexgo025517@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scummvm - Interpreter for several adventure games Alias: scummvm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214055 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |chris.stone at gmail.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | Alias| |scummvm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 5 20:41:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Nov 2006 15:41:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214025] Review Request: Tracker - An object database, tag/metadata database, search tool and indexer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611052041.kA5KfupS025601@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Tracker - An object database, tag/metadata database, search tool and indexer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214025 dakingun at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |214112 ------- Additional Comments From dakingun at gmail.com 2006-11-05 15:41 EST ------- I've included an autostart desktop file and took care of comment #13; new src rpm are at: Spec URL: ftp://czar.eas.yorku.ca/pub/tracker/tracker.spec SRPM URL: ftp://czar.eas.yorku.ca/pub/tracker/tracker-0.5.0-4.src.rpm PS: Also filled a bug against mikmod obsoleting tracker and making this depend on it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 5 20:42:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Nov 2006 15:42:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214057] Review Request: beneath-a-steel-sky - Beneath a Steel Sky - Adventure Game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611052042.kA5KgPAc025645@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: beneath-a-steel-sky - Beneath a Steel Sky - Adventure Game Alias: scummvm-bass https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214057 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |chris.stone at gmail.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | Alias| |scummvm-bass -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 5 20:43:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Nov 2006 15:43:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214091] Review Request: beneath-a-steel-sky-cd - Beneath a Steel Sky - Adventure Game - CD version In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611052043.kA5KhQNi025720@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: beneath-a-steel-sky-cd - Beneath a Steel Sky - Adventure Game - CD version Alias: scummvm-bass-CD https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214091 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |chris.stone at gmail.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | Alias| |scummvm-bass-CD -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 5 20:44:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Nov 2006 15:44:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214113] Review Request: flight-of-the-amazon-queen - Flight of the Amazon Queen - Adventure Game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611052044.kA5KiknX025795@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: flight-of-the-amazon-queen - Flight of the Amazon Queen - Adventure Game Alias: scummvm-amazon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214113 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |chris.stone at gmail.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | Alias| |scummvm-amazon -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 5 20:55:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Nov 2006 15:55:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214106] Review Request: php-pear-Net-FTP - Provides an OO interface to the PHP FTP functions plus some additions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611052055.kA5KtnN8026187@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Net-FTP - Provides an OO interface to the PHP FTP functions plus some additions Alias: pear-Net-FTP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214106 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |chris.stone at gmail.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | Alias| |pear-Net-FTP -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 5 21:41:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Nov 2006 16:41:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214124] New: Review Request: bogl - a graphics library and an Unicode terminal emulator Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214124 Summary: Review Request: bogl - a graphics library and an Unicode terminal emulator Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mitr at redhat.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/mitr/extras/bogl.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/mitr/extras/bogl-0.1.18-12.src.rpm Description: BOGL stands for Ben's Own Graphics Library. It is a small graphics library for Linux kernel frame buffers. It supports only very simple graphics. The bterm application is a terminal emulator that displays to a Linux frame buffer. It is able to display Unicode text on the console. This package used to be in Fedora Core and was dropped after anaconda removed support for it. This version drops the modifications for anaconda support, to be included as a standalone package in Extras. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 5 21:50:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Nov 2006 16:50:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 212894] Review Request: libopm - Blitzed open proxy monitor library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611052150.kA5LoDHn028923@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libopm - Blitzed open proxy monitor library Alias: libopm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212894 ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2006-11-05 16:50 EST ------- ======== REVIEW CHECKLIST ======== - rpmlint output clean - package named according to package naming guidelines - spec filename matches package name - package meets packaging guidelines - package licensed with opensource compatible license - license in spec matches actual license - license in %doc - spec file written in American English - spec file is legible X SOURCE FILES DO NOT MATCH - package successfully compiles and builds on FC5 x86_64 - no build dependencies required - no locales required - %post and %postun properly run ldconfig - package is not relocatable - package owns all directories it creates - no duplicate files in %files - permissions are set properly - spec file contains proper %clean section - macro usage is consistent - package contains code - no large documentation files - files in %doc do not affect runtime - header files are in devel subpackage - no pkgconfig used - .so file in devel - devel package requires base package - package does not contain .la file - not a GUI app, no .desktop file needed - package does not own files or directories owned by other pacakges ======== MUST FIX ======== X SOURCES DO NOT MATCH - 5537327b4e76bd2c5074996b16cad361 ../SOURCES/libopm-0.1.tar.gz - c3da807c0d90cc89c301d83ac5669238 cvs/libopm-0.1.tar.gz - Please provide specific tar instruction used, I don't want to check the md5sum of each source file individually. I believe the difference is caused by the order of the files in the tarball. The command I used to tar the source files was: tar czf libopm-0.1.tar.gz libopm-0.1/ - In addition, your cvs co command should include a specific date so that if something is added to the cvs in the future, someone can still pull the exact sources used in this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 5 22:02:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Nov 2006 17:02:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214113] Review Request: flight-of-the-amazon-queen - Flight of the Amazon Queen - Adventure Game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611052202.kA5M2API029211@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: flight-of-the-amazon-queen - Flight of the Amazon Queen - Adventure Game Alias: scummvm-amazon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214113 ------- Additional Comments From sander at hoentjen.eu 2006-11-05 17:01 EST ------- Why the versioned require on scummvm? There is no older version available for fedora. In addition a scummvm-0.8.2 from a certain other repo works just fine as well. Same goes for the other scumm-games. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 5 22:32:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Nov 2006 17:32:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 212894] Review Request: libopm - Blitzed open proxy monitor library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611052232.kA5MWTEU030040@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libopm - Blitzed open proxy monitor library Alias: libopm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212894 ------- Additional Comments From redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de 2006-11-05 17:32 EST ------- Adding date to the checkout command should be no problem (try `cvs -z3 -d: pserver:anon at cvs.blitzed.org:/ co -D "20050731 23:59" libopm`), but how to change the ordering of the files in the tarball I absolutely don't know. All I did was a "tar cvfz libopm-0.1.tar.gz libopm-0.1" as non-root user. But is this really important? [22:56:14] < mitr> rsc: Perhaps (tar czf foo.tar.gz $(find libopm-0.1 | LC_ALL=C sort)) will make the file order consistent - but I don't know about other attributes of the tarball, e. g. owner&group. [22:56:30] < rsc> hm. [22:57:21] < mitr> rsc: IMHO it should be enough to compare a checkout and the tarball by preparing them and using (diff -urN) [22:57:23] < ensc> what's the sense of the md5sum check? [22:57:59] < ensc> packager can rpm-import everything what he wants Finally the suggested command adds every file twice here... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 5 23:28:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Nov 2006 18:28:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214025] Review Request: Tracker - An object database, tag/metadata database, search tool and indexer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611052328.kA5NS6KQ031513@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Tracker - An object database, tag/metadata database, search tool and indexer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214025 ------- Additional Comments From gauret at free.fr 2006-11-05 18:27 EST ------- There is no gnome-utils-devel on FC5, could you replace its requirement with something like : %if "%fedora" >= "6" BuildRequires: gnome-utils-devel %else BuildRequires: dbus-devel, dbus-glib %endif On the other hand, I'm not sure gnome-utils is of any use for building tracker. It only seem to appears in src/tracker-search-tool/tracker-search-tool.c -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 6 01:00:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Nov 2006 20:00:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214025] Review Request: Tracker - An object database, tag/metadata database, search tool and indexer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611060100.kA6103wZ001979@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Tracker - An object database, tag/metadata database, search tool and indexer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214025 ------- Additional Comments From dakingun at gmail.com 2006-11-05 20:00 EST ------- (In reply to comment #15) > There is no gnome-utils-devel on FC5, could you replace its requirement with That's a mistake actually, I didn't intend to have BR on gnome-utils-devel and openssl-devel as I don't think they are needed. Corrected with these, Spec URL: ftp://czar.eas.yorku.ca/pub/tracker/tracker.spec SRPM URL: ftp://czar.eas.yorku.ca/pub/tracker/tracker-0.5.0-5.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 6 03:26:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Nov 2006 22:26:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 191175] Review Request: pyserial - Python serial port access library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611060326.kA63Q1tZ007237@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyserial - Python serial port access library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191175 ------- Additional Comments From adam at spicenitz.org 2006-11-05 22:25 EST ------- Do you still need the libdirname in %build? Unless I'm confused, you shouldn't have it. Please remove it and I think I will be able to accept. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 6 04:18:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Nov 2006 23:18:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 211336] Review Request: adesklets - A simple architecture for desktop applets In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611060418.kA64IwNv009138@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: adesklets - A simple architecture for desktop applets Alias: adeskets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211336 ------- Additional Comments From luya_tfz at thefinalzone.com 2006-11-05 23:18 EST ------- Understood. I will take time to rework the spec file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 6 05:09:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2006 00:09:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 212894] Review Request: libopm - Blitzed open proxy monitor library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611060509.kA659HeS010716@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libopm - Blitzed open proxy monitor library Alias: libopm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212894 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2006-11-06 00:09 EST ------- $ diff -urN libopm-0.1 ../rpmbuild/SOURCES/libopm-0.1 Output clean. Please add -D "20050731 23:59" to the comments after checking into CVS. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 6 05:13:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2006 00:13:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 210790] Review Request: dar - Collection of scripts for making/restoring CD/DVD backups In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611060513.kA65D4j8010805@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dar - Collection of scripts for making/restoring CD/DVD backups https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210790 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-11-06 00:13 EST ------- Note: I will be busy till this Thursday (in Japan: EST+14h) and I may not be able to check your srpm by that day. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 6 06:20:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2006 01:20:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214113] Review Request: flight-of-the-amazon-queen - Flight of the Amazon Queen - Adventure Game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611060620.kA66KBRc013033@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: flight-of-the-amazon-queen - Flight of the Amazon Queen - Adventure Game Alias: scummvm-amazon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214113 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-11-06 01:20 EST ------- scummvm-0.9.1 is under review too, and that is what I tested with. I don't want to be getting bugs caused by older scummvm versions then what I tested with. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 6 06:26:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2006 01:26:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 212974] Review Request: aspell-ar - Word list/dictionaries for Arabic In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611060626.kA66QGAW013261@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aspell-ar - Word list/dictionaries for Arabic https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212974 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |varekova at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2006-11-06 01:26 EST ------- Can aspell-ar not be included in Fedora Core? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 6 07:54:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2006 02:54:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 212974] Review Request: aspell-ar - Word list/dictionaries for Arabic In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611060754.kA67sGDY016670@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aspell-ar - Word list/dictionaries for Arabic https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212974 ------- Additional Comments From danken at cs.technion.ac.il 2006-11-06 02:54 EST ------- I certainly wouldn't mind if aspell-ar (as well as aspell-he) is included in Core. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 6 08:42:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2006 03:42:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214150] New: Review Request: flight-of-the-amazon-queen-cd - Flight of the Amazon Queen - Adventure Game - CD version Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214150 Summary: Review Request: flight-of-the-amazon-queen-cd - Flight of the Amazon Queen - Adventure Game - CD version Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/flight-of-the-amazon-queen-cd.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/flight-of-the-amazon-queen-cd-1.0-1.src.rpm Description: It is 1949 and you play Joe King, pilot for hire with his small private plane the 'Amazon Queen'. The game is a spoof of old timey radio adventure serials, and as it begins we find Joe in one of those typical situations. It is 11:58 and 36 seconds and counting, Joe and his date are tied up in an abandoned warehouse ("you really know how to show a girl a good time, Joe!"), and a bomb is set to go off at midnight! Of course they escape, in the nick of time, and immediately set us up for the next 'adventure'. Joe suddenly remembers that he is scheduled to fly the famous movie star, Faye Russell, to a photo shoot in the Amazon jungle the next morning. This package contains the CD version, which contains additional / longer cutscenes and voice acting, but also is much larger: 37 MB where as the also available floppy version (package flight-of-the-amazon-queen) is only 7 MB. --- Note that this package requires scummvm, whose review request is here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214055 I'll also submitted the floppy version for review as bug 214113 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 6 08:45:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2006 03:45:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214151] New: Review Request: flight-of-the-amazon-queen-cd - Flight of the Amazon Queen - Adventure Game - CD version Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214151 Summary: Review Request: flight-of-the-amazon-queen-cd - Flight of the Amazon Queen - Adventure Game - CD version Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/flight-of-the-amazon-queen-cd.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/flight-of-the-amazon-queen-cd-1.0-1.src.rpm Description: It is 1949 and you play Joe King, pilot for hire with his small private plane the 'Amazon Queen'. The game is a spoof of old timey radio adventure serials, and as it begins we find Joe in one of those typical situations. It is 11:58 and 36 seconds and counting, Joe and his date are tied up in an abandoned warehouse ("you really know how to show a girl a good time, Joe!"), and a bomb is set to go off at midnight! Of course they escape, in the nick of time, and immediately set us up for the next 'adventure'. Joe suddenly remembers that he is scheduled to fly the famous movie star, Faye Russell, to a photo shoot in the Amazon jungle the next morning. This package contains the CD version, which contains additional / longer cutscenes and voice acting, but also is much larger: 37 MB where as the also available floppy version (package flight-of-the-amazon-queen) is only 7 MB. --- Note that this package requires scummvm, whose review request is here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214055 I'll also submitted the floppy version for review as bug 214113 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 6 08:47:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2006 03:47:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214151] Review Request: flight-of-the-amazon-queen-cd - Flight of the Amazon Queen - Adventure Game - CD version In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611060847.kA68lxUn020009@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: flight-of-the-amazon-queen-cd - Flight of the Amazon Queen - Adventure Game - CD version https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214151 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-11-06 03:47 EST ------- Oops, dup, sorry closing as dup (Using bugzilla from IE is no fun). *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 214150 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 6 08:48:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2006 03:48:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214150] Review Request: flight-of-the-amazon-queen-cd - Flight of the Amazon Queen - Adventure Game - CD version In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611060848.kA68mAQX020032@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: flight-of-the-amazon-queen-cd - Flight of the Amazon Queen - Adventure Game - CD version https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214150 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-11-06 03:48 EST ------- *** Bug 214151 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 6 08:51:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2006 03:51:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214055] Review Request: scummvm - Interpreter for several adventure games In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611060851.kA68pTbg020342@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scummvm - Interpreter for several adventure games Alias: scummvm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214055 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-11-06 03:51 EST ------- And the last 2: Flight of the Amazon Queen is bug 214113 Flight of the Amazon Queen (CD version) is bug 214150 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 6 08:51:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2006 03:51:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214150] Review Request: flight-of-the-amazon-queen-cd - Flight of the Amazon Queen - Adventure Game - CD version In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611060851.kA68pwKZ020426@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: flight-of-the-amazon-queen-cd - Flight of the Amazon Queen - Adventure Game - CD version https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214150 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |214055 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 6 08:52:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2006 03:52:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214055] Review Request: scummvm - Interpreter for several adventure games In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611060852.kA68qAFg020455@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scummvm - Interpreter for several adventure games Alias: scummvm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214055 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |214150 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 6 08:57:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2006 03:57:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214025] Review Request: Tracker - An object database, tag/metadata database, search tool and indexer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611060857.kA68v2nm020965@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Tracker - An object database, tag/metadata database, search tool and indexer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214025 ------- Additional Comments From gauret at free.fr 2006-11-06 03:57 EST ------- You need to BuildRequire dbus-devel and dbus-glib. They are checked by ./configure, and not pulled by other packages on FC-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 6 09:52:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2006 04:52:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214055] Review Request: scummvm - Interpreter for several adventure games In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611060952.kA69qJiO025779@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scummvm - Interpreter for several adventure games Alias: scummvm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214055 ------- Additional Comments From matthias at rpmforge.net 2006-11-06 04:52 EST ------- Quick comments : - You don't need to use "--add-category X-Fedora" any more (it's useless) - For all the icons/hicolor files, I'd use "install -D" to remove all mkdir lines - The scummvm-icons could maybe be extracted at prep time with ImageMagick -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 6 10:11:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2006 05:11:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 212984] Review Request: openoffice.org-langpack-ar-dict - Arabic word list/dictionaries for OpenOffice In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611061011.kA6AB3Bj026846@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: openoffice.org-langpack-ar-dict - Arabic word list/dictionaries for OpenOffice https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212984 ------- Additional Comments From caolanm at redhat.com 2006-11-06 05:10 EST ------- nothing wrong with doing this, there's a cs_CZ one in extras already -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 6 13:08:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2006 08:08:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 212513] Review Request: sparse - source code semantec parser used by the Linux kernel In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611061308.kA6D8Uex008980@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sparse - source code semantec parser used by the Linux kernel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212513 Matt_Domsch at dell.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE Fixed In Version| |0-0.1.20061026git ------- Additional Comments From Matt_Domsch at dell.com 2006-11-06 08:08 EST ------- packages built and released, closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 6 13:19:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2006 08:19:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 205755] Review Request: elsa - manages group of processes and allows accounting In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611061319.kA6DJLYZ009586@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: elsa - manages group of processes and allows accounting https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205755 ------- Additional Comments From guillaume.thouvenin at bull.net 2006-11-06 08:19 EST ------- I replaced the kernel-devel dependancy by kernel-headers in the elsa.spec file. I also added the quick fix to define kversion. I also fixed the compilation problem by adding the header in jobd.c. The new URLs are: Spec URL: http://www.bullopensource.org/elsa-srpm/elsa.spec SRPM URL: http://www.bullopensource.org/elsa-srpm/elsa-1.3.0-3.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 6 14:22:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2006 09:22:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214055] Review Request: scummvm - Interpreter for several adventure games In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611061422.kA6EMgej014713@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scummvm - Interpreter for several adventure games Alias: scummvm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214055 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-11-06 09:22 EST ------- (In reply to comment #6) > Quick comments : > - You don't need to use "--add-category X-Fedora" any more (it's useless) I know, but AFAIK the guidelines haven't been updated with regards to this, so I'm keeping this as is for all my packages for now to keep things consistent. I'll start fixing this to match the new guidelines when there are new guidelines and as / when packages need updating fro something more important. > - For all the icons/hicolor files, I'd use "install -D" to remove all mkdir lines And right you would be, however I'm used to doing it this way, maybe its time to change my habbits? But this works and is much easier to read for people who are not known with the more obscure install cmdline options. > - The scummvm-icons could maybe be extracted at prep time with ImageMagick I've tried but the .ico file contains 8, 16 and 32 bit versions of each icon (the 128x128 is only available in 32 bit) and ImageMagick fails on extracting the 32 bit ones (the colors are all messed up). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 6 14:26:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2006 09:26:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 190189] Review Request: PyQt4: Python bindings for Qt4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611061426.kA6EQklu014949@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PyQt4: Python bindings for Qt4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190189 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-11-06 09:26 EST ------- Woo hoo, the wait is finally over. The bad news is that PyQt4-4.1 requires sip-4.5 Spec URL: http://kde-redhat.unl.edu/apt/kde-redhat/SPECS/PyQt4.spec SRPM URL: http://kde-redhat.unl.edu/apt/kde-redhat/all/SRPMS.stable/PyQt4-4.1-1.src.rpm %changelog * Mon Nov 06 2006 Rex Dieter 4.1-1 - PyQt4-4.1 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 6 14:28:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2006 09:28:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 205755] Review Request: elsa - manages group of processes and allows accounting In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611061428.kA6ESaMg015077@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: elsa - manages group of processes and allows accounting https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205755 ------- Additional Comments From konradr at redhat.com 2006-11-06 09:28 EST ------- Excellent. Your package ran through the build system without any trouble. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 6 14:31:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2006 09:31:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 190189] Review Request: PyQt4: Python bindings for Qt4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611061431.kA6EVSQS015218@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PyQt4: Python bindings for Qt4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190189 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |214193 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 6 14:35:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2006 09:35:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 205755] Review Request: elsa - manages group of processes and allows accounting In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611061435.kA6EZpnS015660@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: elsa - manages group of processes and allows accounting https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205755 ------- Additional Comments From konradr at redhat.com 2006-11-06 09:35 EST ------- Josh, The package is in good shape. Builds with internal Red Hat build system on FC6. The spec file looks good and problems with it have been fixed. What is your thoguht? Is it ready to go in CVS? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 6 14:40:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2006 09:40:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213432] Review Request: kaffeine - Xine-based media player In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611061440.kA6EecCb016482@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kaffeine - Xine-based media player https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213432 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-11-06 09:40 EST ------- > Is kaffeine intended to be for fc4 and below ? No, but it could be. Seriously, is this a blocker for you? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 6 14:41:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2006 09:41:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213180] Review Request: tcl-thread - Thread extension for Tcl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611061441.kA6EfHBU016588@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tcl-thread - Thread extension for Tcl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213180 jwboyer at jdub.homelinux.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 6 14:42:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2006 09:42:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 186452] Review Request: kdebluetooth: The KDE Bluetooth Framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611061442.kA6EgM60016719@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdebluetooth: The KDE Bluetooth Framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=186452 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(rdieter at math.unl.e| |du) | ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-11-06 09:42 EST ------- I'll get a chance to take a closer look at this sometime this week. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 6 14:43:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2006 09:43:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 203520] Review Request: evolution-brutus In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611061443.kA6EhFkF016841@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: evolution-brutus Alias: evolution-brutus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203520 ------- Additional Comments From colding at omesc.com 2006-11-06 09:43 EST ------- OK, here we go again: SRPM: http://www.omesc.com/content/downloads/dist/Fedora%20Core%20Development/SRPMS/evolution-brutus-1.1.12-1.src.rpm SPEC: http://www.omesc.com/content/downloads/dist/Fedora%20Core%20Development/SPECS/evolution-brutus.spec Best regards, jules -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 6 14:50:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2006 09:50:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 205755] Review Request: elsa - manages group of processes and allows accounting In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611061450.kA6EoZx4017359@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: elsa - manages group of processes and allows accounting https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205755 ------- Additional Comments From konradr at redhat.com 2006-11-06 09:50 EST ------- Correction: MUSTFIX: - md5sum don't match. Teh one in the SRPM is different from the one on SF: ->SF: bab9a2b966f6a997dac717b773ab1507 elsa-1.3.0.tar.bz2 ->SRPM: af98c61eab62c7be0d2b47c1c9d4b0c2 - also, the version-release-build-release is not used. For example, you have -1.3.0-3. Why not use 1.3-3 ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 6 15:01:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2006 10:01:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 209261] Review Request: beryl-settings - Beryl OpenGL window and compositing manager GUI config utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611061501.kA6F178a018204@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: beryl-settings - Beryl OpenGL window and compositing manager GUI config utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209261 ------- Additional Comments From jwilson at redhat.com 2006-11-06 10:01 EST ------- Hrm, I somehow never noticed that... The beryl-settings source tree has nothing but svg graphics files, looks like s/png/svg/ in the .desktop file should fix that. Okay, -3 spec and srpm pushed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 6 15:12:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2006 10:12:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 191175] Review Request: pyserial - Python serial port access library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611061512.kA6FCkXZ019527@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyserial - Python serial port access library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191175 ------- Additional Comments From i at stingr.net 2006-11-06 10:12 EST ------- Sorry, fixed. http://stingr.net/l/fe/pyserial.spec http://stingr.net/l/fe/pyserial-2.2-4.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 6 15:29:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2006 10:29:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 209259] Review Request: beryl-core - Beryl OpenGL window and compositing manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611061529.kA6FT814021076@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: beryl-core - Beryl OpenGL window and compositing manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209259 ------- Additional Comments From jwilson at redhat.com 2006-11-06 10:29 EST ------- (In reply to comment #10) > Is it possible to go with this ? > > Requires: gnome-desktop, control-center > > If not, one who has install kde only will have to install all those dependencies > of the gnome-desktop. The current Requires: are: Requires: gnome-desktop, control-center Requires: xorg-x11-server-Xorg Requires: mesa-libGL >= 6.5-9 Requires: system-logos, gnome-session I suppose its perfectly logical to drop the xorg-x11-server-Xorg Requires:, since gnome-desktop would pull it in. I want to leave the mesa-libGL requirement in there. Up in the air about system-logos, since I don't think beryl actually uses it for anything -- that probably got pulled over from compiz Requires:. I presume the main beef you've got is with gnome-session, which does pull in a ton of stuff, and really isn't a hard requirement for beryl. Okay, I think the following Requires: works for me: Requires: gnome-desktop, control-center Requires: mesa-libGL >= 6.5-9 Sound good to others as well? I'll double-check the Reqs on the other packages as well, will likely push new builds of everything later today... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 6 15:48:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2006 10:48:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 209259] Review Request: beryl-core - Beryl OpenGL window and compositing manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611061548.kA6Fmlf8023191@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: beryl-core - Beryl OpenGL window and compositing manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209259 ------- Additional Comments From jwilson at redhat.com 2006-11-06 10:46 EST ------- Or did I misunderstand, and you wanted the gnome-desktop and control-center Reqs dropped? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 6 15:51:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2006 10:51:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 209259] Review Request: beryl-core - Beryl OpenGL window and compositing manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611061551.kA6FpKNx023481@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: beryl-core - Beryl OpenGL window and compositing manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209259 ------- Additional Comments From jwilson at redhat.com 2006-11-06 10:46 EST ------- Or did I misunderstand, and you wanted the gnome-desktop and control-center Reqs dropped? ------- Additional Comments From jwilson at redhat.com 2006-11-06 10:51 EST ------- Or did I misunderstand, and you wanted the gnome-desktop and control-center Reqs dropped? Actually, the more I think about it, reducing the Requires: down to just mesa-libGL might make sense... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 6 16:18:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2006 11:18:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214025] Review Request: Tracker - An object database, tag/metadata database, search tool and indexer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611061618.kA6GIA73027122@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Tracker - An object database, tag/metadata database, search tool and indexer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214025 ------- Additional Comments From dakingun at gmail.com 2006-11-06 11:18 EST ------- Spec URL: ftp://czar.eas.yorku.ca/pub/tracker/tracker.spec SRPM URL: ftp://czar.eas.yorku.ca/pub/tracker/tracker-0.5.0-6.src.rpm With build requires for dbus-devel and dbus-glib -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 6 16:27:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2006 11:27:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 212856] Review Request: php-pear-Pager - Data paging class In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611061627.kA6GRL8h028213@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Pager - Data paging class Alias: php-pear-Pager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212856 Fedora at FamilleCollet.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |Fedora at FamilleCollet.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 6 16:28:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2006 11:28:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 212856] Review Request: php-pear-Pager - Data paging class In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611061628.kA6GSHa8028294@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Pager - Data paging class Alias: php-pear-Pager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212856 Fedora at FamilleCollet.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 6 16:32:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2006 11:32:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 212856] Review Request: php-pear-Pager - Data paging class In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611061632.kA6GWC1R028555@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Pager - Data paging class Alias: php-pear-Pager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212856 ------- Additional Comments From Fedora at FamilleCollet.com 2006-11-06 11:32 EST ------- * source files match upstream: 9dd1fd0aee0e8039f1a4033f822d50c3 Pager-2.4.2.tgz * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * dist tag is present. * build root is correct. * license field matches the actual license (BSD) * license is open source-compatible. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development). * package installs properly * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: php-pear(Pager) = 2.4.2 php-pear-Pager = 2.4.2-1.fc6 * %check is not present; see comment * owns the directories it creates * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * scriptlets are OK (pear install) * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. APPROVED Example provided work fine. I've don't find how to run test-suit (even with simpletest installed) ?? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 6 16:32:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2006 11:32:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 212856] Review Request: php-pear-Pager - Data paging class In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611061632.kA6GWn94028620@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Pager - Data paging class Alias: php-pear-Pager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212856 Fedora at FamilleCollet.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 6 16:51:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2006 11:51:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 196393] Review Request: svrcore-devel In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611061651.kA6GpuZ9031007@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: svrcore-devel Alias: svrcore-devel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196393 ------- Additional Comments From jwilson at redhat.com 2006-11-06 11:51 EST ------- Its a bit of a balancing act here, I suppose... We want FDS in Extras sooner than later, but we can't loosen the guidelines for something just because we really want it. Yes, when upstream ships only a static lib, its not a blocker, but since we *are* upstream, it seems we ought to fix this, not skate around it -- I think the rule is generally meant to apply to situations where the packager has no direct control over what upstream does. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 6 16:52:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2006 11:52:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 190189] Review Request: PyQt4: Python bindings for Qt4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611061652.kA6GqrJ1031113@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PyQt4: Python bindings for Qt4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190189 Bug 190189 depends on bug 214193, which changed state. Bug 214193 Summary: sip: upgrade to 4.5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214193 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |RAWHIDE Status|NEW |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 6 16:53:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2006 11:53:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 203520] Review Request: evolution-brutus In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611061653.kA6Gr8PP031166@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: evolution-brutus Alias: evolution-brutus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203520 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-11-06 11:53 EST ------- Well, as I said before, I cannot precisely check your srpm now. however: A. undefined non-weak symbols reappeared. ---------------------------------------------------------- W: evolution-brutus undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libBrutus-1.0.so.1.0.0 camel_object_type W: evolution-brutus undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libBrutus-1.0.so.1.0.0 camel_object_cast W: evolution-brutus undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libBrutus-1.0.so.1.0.0 camel_base64_decode_simple W: evolution-brutus undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libBrutus-1.0.so.1.0.0 camel_multipart_get_number W: evolution-brutus undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libBrutus-1.0.so.1.0.0 camel_stream_mem_new W: evolution-brutus undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libBrutus-1.0.so.1.0.0 camel_internet_address_get W: evolution-brutus undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libBrutus-1.0.so.1.0.0 camel_mime_message_get_recipients W: evolution-brutus undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libBrutus-1.0.so.1.0.0 camel_mime_part_get_content_id W: evolution-brutus undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libBrutus-1.0.so.1.0.0 camel_mime_part_get_description ............................... ---------------------------------------------------------- Through brief check, ---------------------------------------------------------- diff -uNr evolution-brutus-1.1.9/server/Makefile.am evolution-brutus-1.1.12/server/Makefile.am --- evolution-brutus-1.1.9/server/Makefile.am 2006-10-19 17:14:31.000000000 +0900 +++ evolution-brutus-1.1.12/server/Makefile.am 2006-11-04 09:05:28.000000000 +0900 @@ -40,7 +40,7 @@ brutus_conv.c libBrutus_1_0_la_LIBADD = \ - $(CALENDAR_LIBS) \ + -lecal-1.2 \ $(BRUTUS_top_dir)/idl_output/libBrutusSTUBS-$(LIBBRUTUS_CURRENT).$(LIBBRUTUS_REVISION).la \ $(BRUTUS_top_dir)/servant_impl/libBrutusSKELS-$(LIBBRUTUS_CURRENT).$(LIBBRUTUS_REVISION).la -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Perhaps this is somewhat incorrect. B. %package devel Summary: IDL and header files for evolution-brutus Group: Development/Libraries Requires: %name = %{version}-%{release} Requires: ORBit2-devel >= 2.14.1 Requires: pkgconfig >= 0.20 Requires: evolution-data-server >= 1.6 Perhaps the last line should be "evolution-data-server-devel >= 1.6" Then evolution-data-server-devel requires libbonobo-devel, which requires ORBit2-devel, then "Requires: ORBit2-devel >= 2.14.1" is not necessary. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 6 16:54:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2006 11:54:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 209262] Review Request: beryl-plugins - Beryl OpenGL window and compositing manager plug-ins In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611061654.kA6GsD64031293@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: beryl-plugins - Beryl OpenGL window and compositing manager plug-ins https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209262 ------- Additional Comments From jwilson at redhat.com 2006-11-06 11:54 EST ------- Rather than replace that file, I've added a Source1 of fedora-cubecaps.png, which is a copy of rhgb main-logo.png, and edited the default cubecaps setting to point to the fedora-cubecaps.png. There's a -3 spec and srpm out there now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 6 17:02:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2006 12:02:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213432] Review Request: kaffeine - Xine-based media player In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611061702.kA6H27gT031931@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kaffeine - Xine-based media player https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213432 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2006-11-06 12:01 EST ------- Hello, cool down buddy! No, it isn't a blocker for me, but I just want to document myself. MUST Items: - MUST: The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. - MUST: The spec file name matches the base package %{name} - MUST: The package meets the Packaging Guidelines. - MUST: The package is licensed (GPL) with an open-source compatible license and meet other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. - MUST: The License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. - MUST: the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. - MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. - MUST: The sources used to build the package must matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. - MUST: The package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least i386. - MUST: All build dependencies is listed in BuildRequires. - MUST: The spec file handles locales properly. - MUST: If the package does not contain shared library files located in the dynamic linker's default paths - MUST: the package is not designed to be relocatable - MUST: the package owns all directories that it creates. - MUST: the package does not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. - MUST: Permissions on files are set properly. - MUST: The package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). - MUST: The package consistently uses macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines. - MUST: The package contains code, or permissable content. This is described in detail in the code vs. content section of Packaging Guidelines. - MUST: There are no Large documentation files - MUST: %doc does not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. - MUST: The package does not contain library files with a suffix - MUST: Package containing GUI applications includes a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. - MUST: Package does not own files or directories already owned by other packages. SHOULD Items: - SHOULD: The source package does include license text(s) as COPYING - SHOULD: mock builds succcessfully in i386. - SHOULD: The reviewer tested that the package functions as described. A package should not segfault instead of running, for example. - SHOULD: No scriptlets were used, those scriptlets must be sane. - SHOULD: No subpackages present. APPROVED! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 6 17:03:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2006 12:03:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213432] Review Request: kaffeine - Xine-based media player In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611061703.kA6H3un1032088@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kaffeine - Xine-based media player https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213432 cgoorah at yahoo.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 6 17:08:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2006 12:08:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 209259] Review Request: beryl-core - Beryl OpenGL window and compositing manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611061708.kA6H8tfC032454@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: beryl-core - Beryl OpenGL window and compositing manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209259 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2006-11-06 12:08 EST ------- (In reply to comment #10) > Is it possible to go with this ? sorry typo!! > Is it possible to go withOUT this ? I just want to know whether these are really a requirement for beryl ? Because to me user KDE don't want to install the gnome-desktop! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 6 17:12:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2006 12:12:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 209259] Review Request: beryl-core - Beryl OpenGL window and compositing manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611061712.kA6HCPmJ000325@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: beryl-core - Beryl OpenGL window and compositing manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209259 ------- Additional Comments From gauret at free.fr 2006-11-06 12:12 EST ------- FYI, I'm running Beryl right now on KDE, without gnome-desktop (I removed it from the spec file). It works perfectly, beryl-manager too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 6 17:12:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2006 12:12:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 209262] Review Request: beryl-plugins - Beryl OpenGL window and compositing manager plug-ins In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611061712.kA6HChYm000413@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: beryl-plugins - Beryl OpenGL window and compositing manager plug-ins https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209262 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2006-11-06 12:12 EST ------- By replacing I mean, asking beryl to pickup /usr/share/rhgb/main-logo.png. A better solution might be: Add fedora-logos-6.0.6-1.fc6 as requires and patch/sed appropriately :) rpm -qf /usr/share/rhgb/main-logo.png fedora-logos-6.0.6-1.fc6 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 6 17:18:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2006 12:18:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 209259] Review Request: beryl-core - Beryl OpenGL window and compositing manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611061718.kA6HI1BS000942@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: beryl-core - Beryl OpenGL window and compositing manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209259 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2006-11-06 12:17 EST ------- Great :) Jarod, could you update your repo as well so that all the people using your repo can test them? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 6 18:17:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2006 13:17:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213432] Review Request: kaffeine - Xine-based media player In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611061817.kA6IH1dq008000@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kaffeine - Xine-based media player https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213432 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-11-06 13:16 EST ------- Thanks (didn't mean to come off as anything but appreciative for the review). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 6 18:17:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2006 13:17:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214227] New: Review Request: vala - A modern programming language for GNOME Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214227 Summary: Review Request: vala - A modern programming language for GNOME Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: michel.salim at gmail.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://hircus.org/fedora/vala/vala.spec SRPM URL: http://hircus.org/fedora/vala/vala-0.0.5-1.src.rpm Description: Vala is a new programming language that aims to bring modern programming language features to GNOME developers without imposing any additional runtime requirements and without using a different ABI compared to applications and libraries written in C. valac, the Vala compiler, is a self-hosting compiler that translates Vala source code into C source and header files. It uses the GObject type system to create classes and interfaces declared in the Vala source code. It's also planned to generate GIDL files when gobject- introspection is ready. The syntax of Vala is similar to C#, modified to better fit the GObject type system. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 6 18:30:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2006 13:30:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 209262] Review Request: beryl-plugins - Beryl OpenGL window and compositing manager plug-ins In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611061830.kA6IU69G009354@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: beryl-plugins - Beryl OpenGL window and compositing manager plug-ins https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209262 ------- Additional Comments From jwilson at redhat.com 2006-11-06 13:30 EST ------- Good idea, I'll go that route instead. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 6 18:30:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2006 13:30:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214025] Review Request: Tracker - An object database, tag/metadata database, search tool and indexer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611061830.kA6IUxcl009465@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Tracker - An object database, tag/metadata database, search tool and indexer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214025 michel.salim at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|michel.salim at gmail.com |gauret at free.fr ------- Additional Comments From michel.salim at gmail.com 2006-11-06 13:30 EST ------- I added the gnome-utils-devel and openssl-devel BRs, since for some reason they appeared as options in the configure script. Deji, could you clarify this with upstream? If they don't actually do anything they should be trimmed out of the configure script. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 6 18:30:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2006 13:30:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 209259] Review Request: beryl-core - Beryl OpenGL window and compositing manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611061830.kA6IUn6W009460@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: beryl-core - Beryl OpenGL window and compositing manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209259 ------- Additional Comments From jwilson at redhat.com 2006-11-06 13:30 EST ------- Yep, workin' on it right now... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 6 18:39:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2006 13:39:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214234] New: Review Request: php-pear-Net-DIME - Implements Direct Internet Message Encapsulation (DIME) Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214234 Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Net-DIME - Implements Direct Internet Message Encapsulation (DIME) Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: Fedora at FamilleCollet.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://remi.collet.free.fr/rpms/extras/php-pear-Net-DIME.spec SRPM URL: http://remi.collet.free.fr/rpms/extras/php-pear-Net-DIME-0.3-1.fc6.src.rpm Mock Log: http://remi.collet.free.fr/rpms/extras/php-pear-Net-DIME-build.log Description: This is the initial independent release of the Net_DIME package. Provides an implementation of "Direct Internet Message Encapsulation" (DIME) as defined at http://search.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-nielsen-dime-02.txt Note : this specification has been superseded by the SOAP Message Transmission Optimization Mechanism (MTOM) specification. ----- I know it's only a beta version I know this extension seems dead. dime_message_test.php seems ok dime_record_test.php seems KO. I know the protocol is "superseded" (it's why i add the note in the desc.) but i need it for the SOAP extension (which only use Net_DIME_Message). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 6 18:43:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2006 13:43:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214236] New: Review Request: php-pear-SOAP - Simple Object Access Protocol (SOAP) Client/Server for PHP Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214236 Summary: Review Request: php-pear-SOAP - Simple Object Access Protocol (SOAP) Client/Server for PHP Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: Fedora at FamilleCollet.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://remi.collet.free.fr/rpms/extras/php-pear-SOAP.spec SRPM URL: http://remi.collet.free.fr/rpms/extras/php-pear-SOAP-0.9.4-1.fc6.src.rpm Mock Log: http://remi.collet.free.fr/rpms/extras/php-pear-SOAP-build.log Description: Implementation of Simple Object Access Protocol (SOAP) protocol and services -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 6 18:44:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2006 13:44:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214236] Review Request: php-pear-SOAP - Simple Object Access Protocol (SOAP) Client/Server for PHP In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611061844.kA6IifsK010896@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-SOAP - Simple Object Access Protocol (SOAP) Client/Server for PHP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214236 Fedora at FamilleCollet.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |212885, 214234 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 6 18:44:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2006 13:44:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 212885] Review Request: php-pear-HTTP-Request - Provides an easy way to perform HTTP requests In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611061844.kA6IihV0010904@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-HTTP-Request - Provides an easy way to perform HTTP requests Alias: pear-HTTP-Request https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212885 Fedora at FamilleCollet.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |214236 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 6 18:44:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2006 13:44:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214234] Review Request: php-pear-Net-DIME - Implements Direct Internet Message Encapsulation (DIME) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611061844.kA6Iilu2010917@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Net-DIME - Implements Direct Internet Message Encapsulation (DIME) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214234 Fedora at FamilleCollet.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |214236 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 6 18:52:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2006 13:52:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214227] Review Request: vala - A modern programming language for GNOME In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611061852.kA6Iquh7011533@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vala - A modern programming language for GNOME https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214227 jeff at ocjtech.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jeff at ocjtech.us OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 6 19:04:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2006 14:04:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 212003] Review Request: mugshot - Companion software for mugshot.org In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611061904.kA6J4blM012334@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mugshot - Companion software for mugshot.org https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212003 otaylor at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #139238|0 |1 is obsolete| | ------- Additional Comments From otaylor at redhat.com 2006-11-06 14:04 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=140497) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=140497&action=view) Spec file with improved GConf scripts New version with the the sophistication/complexity of the GConf handling increased to match ScripletSnippets. (Quote from Havoc: 'Mostly this just makes me think "geez, someone should really take a couple days and move schemas to be loaded client-side already"') -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 6 19:12:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2006 14:12:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 204493] Review Request: perl-Mozilla-DOM - Perl interface to Mozilla DOM In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611061912.kA6JCTFi012974@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Mozilla-DOM - Perl interface to Mozilla DOM https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204493 ------- Additional Comments From otaylor at redhat.com 2006-11-06 14:12 EST ------- FC6 has firefox-devel -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 6 19:27:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2006 14:27:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214227] Review Request: vala - A modern programming language for GNOME In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611061927.kA6JRAnn014471@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vala - A modern programming language for GNOME https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214227 jeff at ocjtech.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jeff at ocjtech.us 2006-11-06 14:26 EST ------- * source files match upstream ec3c9b717c49bd4fb207d368fe296475 vala-0.0.5.tar.bz2 ec3c9b717c49bd4fb207d368fe296475 vala-0.0.5.tar.bz2.1 * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * dist tag is present. * build root is correct. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. License text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * compiler flags are appropriate. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development & fc6, i386). * package installs properly. Sample code from home page builds and executes properly. * rpmlint has only acceptable complaints. W: vala-devel no-documentation * %check is not present; There is some test code in the distribution but no framework to actually run the tests. * shared libraries are present; ldconfig is called properly. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * scriptlets are OK * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * headers are in the -devel subpackage. * unversioned .so file is in the -devel subpackage. * pkconfig file in in the -devel subpackage * no libtool .la droppings. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 6 19:48:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2006 14:48:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214025] Review Request: Tracker - An object database, tag/metadata database, search tool and indexer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611061948.kA6JmZeN017627@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Tracker - An object database, tag/metadata database, search tool and indexer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214025 ------- Additional Comments From gauret at free.fr 2006-11-06 14:48 EST ------- Needs work: * Make sure the lines in the %description field are not more than 76 chars long * Applications/System Tool is not a standard group * Remove the dot at the end of the summary for the -devel subpackage * As tracker-devel ships a pkgconfig file (.pc), is should have "Requires: pkgconfig" -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 6 19:57:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2006 14:57:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 209259] Review Request: beryl-core - Beryl OpenGL window and compositing manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611061957.kA6JvA00018778@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: beryl-core - Beryl OpenGL window and compositing manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209259 ------- Additional Comments From jwilson at redhat.com 2006-11-06 14:57 EST ------- Okay, updated binaries available for all three arches. There are also beryl-dbus packages now as well. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 6 20:14:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2006 15:14:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214227] Review Request: vala - A modern programming language for GNOME In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611062014.kA6KE94D020918@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vala - A modern programming language for GNOME https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214227 ------- Additional Comments From michel.salim at gmail.com 2006-11-06 15:14 EST ------- That's the fastest review I've ever seen - thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 6 20:27:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2006 15:27:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214266] New: Review Request: perl-Moose-Policy - Moose-mounted police Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214266 Summary: Review Request: perl-Moose-Policy - Moose-mounted police Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Moose-Policy/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com SRPM URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-Moose-Policy-0.02-1.fc6.src.rpm SPEC URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-Moose-Policy.spec Description: This module allows you to specify your project-wide or even company-wide Moose meta-policy. Most all of Moose's features can be customized through the use of custom metaclasses, however fiddling with the metaclasses can be hairy. Moose::Policy removes most of that hairiness and makes it possible to cleanly contain a set of meta-level customizations in one easy to use module. This is an early release of this module and it should not be considered to be complete by any means. It is very basic implemenation at this point and will likely get more feature-full over time, as people request features. So if you have a suggestion/need/idea, please speak up. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 6 20:27:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2006 15:27:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214266] Review Request: perl-Moose-Policy - Moose-mounted police In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611062027.kA6KRkfV022317@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Moose-Policy - Moose-mounted police https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214266 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |163776 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 6 21:16:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2006 16:16:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 194374] Review Request: kdegames: K Desktop Environment - Games In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611062116.kA6LGI8E028338@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdegames: K Desktop Environment - Games https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194374 cgoorah at yahoo.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |cgoorah at yahoo.com.au ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2006-11-06 16:16 EST ------- I'll review this: however : 1. I think the src.rpm I have to review is this one http://kde-redhat.unl.edu/apt/kde-redhat/all/SRPMS.stable/kdegames-3.5.5-1.src.rpm 2. why is this bug blocked by https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200236 ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 6 21:19:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2006 16:19:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 194374] Review Request: kdegames: K Desktop Environment - Games In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611062119.kA6LJpDv028615@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdegames: K Desktop Environment - Games https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194374 cgoorah at yahoo.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 6 21:24:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2006 16:24:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 194374] Review Request: kdegames: K Desktop Environment - Games In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611062124.kA6LOZ8N029212@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdegames: K Desktop Environment - Games https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194374 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-11-06 16:24 EST ------- > 1. 1. I think the src.rpm I have to review is this one: kdegames-3.5.5-1.src.rpm yup. > 2. why is this bug blocked by kdeaddons, bug #200236 kdeaddons includes: BuildRequires: kdegames-devel -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 6 21:26:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2006 16:26:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 200236] Review Request: kdeaddons: K Desktop Environment - Plugins In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611062126.kA6LQDfR029486@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdeaddons: K Desktop Environment - Plugins https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200236 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-11-06 16:26 EST ------- Thanks, I'll fix things up shortly. (Though X-Fedora .desktop category is not required anymore, I'll have to check the Application bit too). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 6 21:35:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2006 16:35:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 190189] Review Request: PyQt4: Python bindings for Qt4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611062135.kA6LZltR030258@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PyQt4: Python bindings for Qt4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190189 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-11-06 16:35 EST ------- FYI, sip-4.5 has been added to rawhide, see bug #214193 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 6 22:26:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2006 17:26:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 194374] Review Request: kdegames: K Desktop Environment - Games In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611062226.kA6MQKJU002108@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdegames: K Desktop Environment - Games https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194374 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2006-11-06 17:24 EST ------- MUST Items: - MUST: The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. - MUST: The spec file name matches the base package %{name} - MUST: The package meets the Packaging Guidelines. - MUST: The package is licensed (GPL) with an open-source compatible license and meet other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. - MUST: The License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. - MUST: the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. - MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. - MUST: The sources used to build the package must matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. - MUST: The package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least i386. - MUST: All build dependencies is listed in BuildRequires. - MUST: The spec file handles locales properly. - MUST: If the package does not contain shared library files located in the dynamic linker's default paths - MUST: the package is not designed to be relocatable - MUST: the package owns all directories that it creates. - MUST: the package does not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. - MUST: Permissions on files are set properly. - MUST: The package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). - MUST: The package consistently uses macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines. - MUST: The package contains code, or permissable content. This is described in detail in the code vs. content section of Packaging Guidelines. - MUST: There are no Large documentation files - MUST: %doc does not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. - MUST: The package does not contain library files with a suffix - MUST: Package containing GUI applications includes a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. - MUST: Package does not own files or directories already owned by other packages. SHOULD Items: - SHOULD: The source package does include license text(s) as COPYING - SHOULD: mock builds succcessfully in i386. - SHOULD: The reviewer tested that the package functions as described. A package should not segfault instead of running, for example. - SHOULD: scriptlets are sane. - SHOULD: No subpackages present. The following should be fixed before uploading to the build systeme, however I won't block it for that because I know you will update it before doing so. APPROUVED #001: rpmlint issues [chitlesh[0] ~]$ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-development-i386-core/result/kdegames-3.5.5-1.fc7.src.rpm W: kdegames macro-in-%changelog _bindir W: kdegames mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 81, tab: line 6) W: kdegames patch-not-applied Patch1: kdegames-3.1.1-konquest.patch at the same time, you can clean #Patch0: kde-libtool.patch as well #002 X-Fedora .desktop category is not required anymore --add-category="X-Fedora" --vendor="" \ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 6 22:28:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2006 17:28:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 194374] Review Request: kdegames: K Desktop Environment - Games In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611062228.kA6MSumn002361@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdegames: K Desktop Environment - Games https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194374 cgoorah at yahoo.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2006-11-06 17:24 EST ------- MUST Items: - MUST: The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. - MUST: The spec file name matches the base package %{name} - MUST: The package meets the Packaging Guidelines. - MUST: The package is licensed (GPL) with an open-source compatible license and meet other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. - MUST: The License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. - MUST: the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. - MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. - MUST: The sources used to build the package must matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. - MUST: The package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least i386. - MUST: All build dependencies is listed in BuildRequires. - MUST: The spec file handles locales properly. - MUST: If the package does not contain shared library files located in the dynamic linker's default paths - MUST: the package is not designed to be relocatable - MUST: the package owns all directories that it creates. - MUST: the package does not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. - MUST: Permissions on files are set properly. - MUST: The package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). - MUST: The package consistently uses macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines. - MUST: The package contains code, or permissable content. This is described in detail in the code vs. content section of Packaging Guidelines. - MUST: There are no Large documentation files - MUST: %doc does not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. - MUST: The package does not contain library files with a suffix - MUST: Package containing GUI applications includes a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. - MUST: Package does not own files or directories already owned by other packages. SHOULD Items: - SHOULD: The source package does include license text(s) as COPYING - SHOULD: mock builds succcessfully in i386. - SHOULD: The reviewer tested that the package functions as described. A package should not segfault instead of running, for example. - SHOULD: scriptlets are sane. - SHOULD: No subpackages present. The following should be fixed before uploading to the build systeme, however I won't block it for that because I know you will update it before doing so. APPROUVED #001: rpmlint issues [chitlesh[0] ~]$ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-development-i386-core/result/kdegames-3.5.5-1.fc7.src.rpm W: kdegames macro-in-%changelog _bindir W: kdegames mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 81, tab: line 6) W: kdegames patch-not-applied Patch1: kdegames-3.1.1-konquest.patch at the same time, you can clean #Patch0: kde-libtool.patch as well #002 X-Fedora .desktop category is not required anymore --add-category="X-Fedora" --vendor="" \ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 6 22:30:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2006 17:30:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 194374] Review Request: kdegames: K Desktop Environment - Games In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611062230.kA6MUx3o002726@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdegames: K Desktop Environment - Games https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194374 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2006-11-06 17:30 EST ------- Now I guess you can work with the kdeaddons package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 6 23:04:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2006 18:04:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214106] Review Request: php-pear-Net-FTP - Provides an OO interface to the PHP FTP functions plus some additions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611062304.kA6N400v005926@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Net-FTP - Provides an OO interface to the PHP FTP functions plus some additions Alias: pear-Net-FTP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214106 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2006-11-06 18:03 EST ------- ==== REVIEW CHECKLIST ==== - rpmlint output clean - packaged named according to package naming guidelines - spec filename matches package %{name} - spec file meets packaging guidelines - package licensed with open source compatible license - license matches actual license - license file included in %doc - spec file written in American english - spec file is legible - sources match upstream fce386d6029e1171ab8f46c7568f2637 Net_FTP-1.3.2.tgz - package successfully compiles and builds on FC5 x86_64 - All build requires listed - no locales - no shared libraries - package not relocatable - package owns all directories it creates - file attributes set properly - package contains proper %clean section - macro usage is consistent - package contains code - no large documentation present - files in %doc do not affect runtime - no header files or static libraries - no pkgconfig files - no need for devel subpackage - not a GUI app APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 6 23:33:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2006 18:33:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214150] Review Request: flight-of-the-amazon-queen-cd - Flight of the Amazon Queen - Adventure Game - CD version In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611062333.kA6NX2Mv007451@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: flight-of-the-amazon-queen-cd - Flight of the Amazon Queen - Adventure Game - CD version Alias: scumm-amazon-CD https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214150 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |chris.stone at gmail.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | Alias| |scumm-amazon-CD -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 6 23:43:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2006 18:43:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214025] Review Request: Tracker - An object database, tag/metadata database, search tool and indexer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611062343.kA6NhIk5008484@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Tracker - An object database, tag/metadata database, search tool and indexer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214025 ------- Additional Comments From dakingun at gmail.com 2006-11-06 18:42 EST ------- No quick response yet from upstream on Michel concern about gnome-utils-devel and openssl-devel BRs; the needs work have all been addressed. I have used Applications/System for the RPM group as I think that's the closest. Spec URL: ftp://czar.eas.yorku.ca/pub/tracker/tracker.spec SRPM URL: ftp://czar.eas.yorku.ca/pub/tracker/tracker-0.5.0-7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 6 23:49:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2006 18:49:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214055] Review Request: scummvm - Interpreter for several adventure games In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611062349.kA6Nnmjp008724@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scummvm - Interpreter for several adventure games Alias: scummvm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214055 ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2006-11-06 18:49 EST ------- Hans, I have a scummvm-tools package from Livna. Do you plan on Obsoleting this package or providing your own scummvm-tools package? I am in the process of starting a review, rpmlint is linting about not using --libdir in your %configure. See rpmlint -I configure-without-libdir-spec for more information. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 6 23:54:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2006 18:54:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 209260] Review Request: beryl-manager - Beryl window decorator and theme management utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611062354.kA6Nsx5Z008985@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: beryl-manager - Beryl window decorator and theme management utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209260 ------- Additional Comments From s.adam at diffingo.com 2006-11-06 18:54 EST ------- They work well here, but I think there's still a few bugs to be ironed out. If I set "beryl-manager" to load on login (Gnome 2.16, FC6, nVidia card) about half the time I get windows that show their contents, but that are unresponsive and the window borders flicker on and off. My CPU monitor applet shows 100% use. Reloading the WM or doing ctrl + alt + F1 and then ctrl + alt + F7 hangs the machine. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 7 00:13:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2006 19:13:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214311] New: Review Request: kcometen3 - An OpenGL screensaver for KDE Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214311 Summary: Review Request: kcometen3 - An OpenGL screensaver for KDE Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: packages at amiga-hardware.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://dribble.org.uk/reviews/kcometen3.spec SRPM URL: http://dribble.org.uk/reviews/kcometen3-1.1-3.src.rpm Description: An OpenGL screensaver for KDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 7 00:15:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2006 19:15:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 207472] Review Request: ruby-activesupport - Utility classes and extension to Ruby's standard library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611070015.kA70FLnJ009761@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-activesupport - Utility classes and extension to Ruby's standard library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207472 ------- Additional Comments From dlutter at redhat.com 2006-11-06 19:15 EST ------- Sorry, that somehow slipped through the cracks; thanks for reminding me. - Updated the spec file with a versioned provides for ruby(active_support): Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/dlutter/yum/spec/ruby-activesupport.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/dlutter/yum/SRPMS/ruby-activesupport-1.3.1-2.src.rpm - For the shebang lines, I haven't chanegd anything; I can't see any harm with that, either, especially since those files are not executable (and shouldn't be) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 7 00:15:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2006 19:15:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214312] New: Review Request: xdms - Extracts Amiga DMS archives Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214312 Summary: Review Request: xdms - Extracts Amiga DMS archives Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: packages at amiga-hardware.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://dribble.org.uk/reviews/xdms.spec SRPM URL: http://dribble.org.uk/reviews/xdms-1.3.2-2.src.rpm Description: Extracts Amiga DMS (Disk Masher) archives which are compressed Amiga disk images. Xdms is particularly useful with Amiga emulators. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 7 02:39:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2006 21:39:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214025] Review Request: Tracker - An object database, tag/metadata database, search tool and indexer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611070239.kA72dZTg016346@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Tracker - An object database, tag/metadata database, search tool and indexer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214025 ------- Additional Comments From dakingun at gmail.com 2006-11-06 21:39 EST ------- Upstream have responded, and that with a new release. GNOME_UTILS that appears in the configure script is actually meant to be GNOME utilities (specifically libgnomeui and gtk+) as opposed to the package gnome-utils. Also they've statically linked in a threadsafe sqlite which builds by default, but also provided a configure option --enable-external-sqlite. This option is used for FC >=6. New spec and src rpms uploaded. Spec URL: ftp://czar.eas.yorku.ca/pub/tracker/tracker.spec SRPM URL: ftp://czar.eas.yorku.ca/pub/tracker/tracker-0.5.1-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 7 02:44:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2006 21:44:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 191175] Review Request: pyserial - Python serial port access library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611070244.kA72ixs6016662@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyserial - Python serial port access library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191175 adam at spicenitz.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 7 07:00:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2006 02:00:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213511] Review Request: gxine - Gnome frontend for the xine multimedia library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611070700.kA770KXr031646@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gxine - Gnome frontend for the xine multimedia library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213511 ------- Additional Comments From mola at c100c.com 2006-11-07 02:00 EST ------- Update Spec : http://www.c100c.com/fedora/gxine.spec Rrpm : http://www.c100c.com/fedora/gxine-0.5.8-3.src.rpm thanks Michel Alexandre some fix -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 7 07:45:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2006 02:45:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214055] Review Request: scummvm - Interpreter for several adventure games In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611070745.kA77jrWS001088@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scummvm - Interpreter for several adventure games Alias: scummvm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214055 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-11-07 02:45 EST ------- (In reply to comment #8) > Hans, > > I have a scummvm-tools package from Livna. Do you plan on Obsoleting this > package or providing your own scummvm-tools package? The plan is to move this to FE too, that is the last scumm related package, I still need to send a mail to Andreas to coordinate this, then update the livna package to the 0.9 release of the tools and submit it for review seperately. > I am in the process of > starting a review, rpmlint is linting about not using --libdir in your > %configure. See rpmlint -I configure-without-libdir-spec for more information. That is because the configure script in scummvm isn't a autoconf configure script but a custom bashscript which doesn't understand -libdir, that is also the reason why %configure isn't used. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 7 08:07:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2006 03:07:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214311] Review Request: kcometen3 - An OpenGL screensaver for KDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611070807.kA787QeU002039@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kcometen3 - An OpenGL screensaver for KDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214311 cgoorah at yahoo.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |cgoorah at yahoo.com.au OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2006-11-07 03:07 EST ------- I'll do the review :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 7 08:13:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2006 03:13:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 205755] Review Request: elsa - manages group of processes and allows accounting In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611070813.kA78DemM002305@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: elsa - manages group of processes and allows accounting https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205755 ------- Additional Comments From guillaume.thouvenin at bull.net 2006-11-07 03:13 EST ------- You're right for the version-release-build-release. The new package is now available from SF and the md5sum should match now. So, the new version is elsa-1.4.tar.bz2. Spec URL: http://www.bullopensource.org/elsa-srpm/elsa.spec SRPM URL: http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/elsa/elsa-1.4-1.src.rpm?download -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 7 08:27:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2006 03:27:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214311] Review Request: kcometen3 - An OpenGL screensaver for KDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611070827.kA78RgR1003065@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kcometen3 - An OpenGL screensaver for KDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214311 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2006-11-07 03:27 EST ------- For the buildrequires: -libjpeg-devel -qt-devel >= 3.2 -/usr/bin/xmllint These will be pulled down as dependencies for kdelibs-devel. libxslt-devel depends on libxml2-devel If not the package looks good, update this I'll do a full review of it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 7 09:06:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2006 04:06:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 203520] Review Request: evolution-brutus In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611070906.kA796tt2007253@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: evolution-brutus Alias: evolution-brutus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203520 ------- Additional Comments From colding at omesc.com 2006-11-07 04:06 EST ------- OK, all of the non-weak-symbols should be history by now. The devel package "Requires:" are fixed as well. New files here: SRPM: http://www.omesc.com/content/downloads/dist/Fedora%20Core%20Development/SRPMS/evolution-brutus-1.1.13-1.src.rpm SPEC: http://www.omesc.com/content/downloads/dist/Fedora%20Core%20Development/SPECS/evolution-brutus.spec BTW, you have an uncanny nack for knowing the complete chain of package requriements. Just like above when you points out that if I "Requires:" evolution-data-server-devel then I don't need ORBit2-devel as it is in "Requires:" for libbonobo-devel way down the Requires chain. How do you do that? A special spec hierachy browser or just a very good memory?? Thanks, jules -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 7 09:23:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2006 04:23:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 205755] Review Request: elsa - manages group of processes and allows accounting In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611070923.kA79NEGj008736@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: elsa - manages group of processes and allows accounting https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205755 ------- Additional Comments From guillaume.thouvenin at bull.net 2006-11-07 04:23 EST ------- It seems that there is a problem with sourceforge. The size of the SRPM package and source file are 0Kb. Maybe it's just because files were recently released. If it doesn't work, here are alternative URL to download files: SRPM URL: http://www.bullopensource.org/elsa-srpm/elsa-1.4-1.src.rpm SOURCE URL: http://www.bullopensource.org/elsa-srpm/elsa-1.4.tar.bz2 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 7 10:39:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2006 05:39:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214311] Review Request: kcometen3 - An OpenGL screensaver for KDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611071039.kA7AdPV7014600@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kcometen3 - An OpenGL screensaver for KDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214311 ------- Additional Comments From packages at amiga-hardware.com 2006-11-07 05:39 EST ------- If it's OK, can you continue with the review and I'll make those BR changes in addition to any changes needed by the review (if any) in the next release? It just saves having lots of minor changelog entries :-) Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 7 13:10:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2006 08:10:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 203520] Review Request: evolution-brutus In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611071310.kA7DAtlI026097@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: evolution-brutus Alias: evolution-brutus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203520 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-11-07 08:10 EST ------- (In reply to comment #55) > BTW, you have an uncanny nack for knowing the complete chain of package > requriements. Just like above when you points out that if I "Requires:" > evolution-data-server-devel then I don't need ORBit2-devel as it is in > "Requires:" for libbonobo-devel way down the Requires chain. How do you do that? > A special spec hierachy browser or just a very good memory?? Usually finding these redundant (Build)Requires needs some work. One of the effective way to find these is * Build srpm by mockbuild * chroot to the top directory of mockbuild * For each package listed in (Build)Requires, try: 'rpm -q --whatrequires ' or 'rpm -e --test ' Note that some rpm packages have chicken?and?egg dependencies. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- BTW, I have not yet checked your new package, however, will you do a "pre-review" of some package listed in: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/showdependencytree.cgi?id=FE-NEW&hide_resolved=1 and tell me what bug you (pre-)reviewed so that I can judge if I can sponsor you ? * What you should check through (pre-)review process are generally listed in: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines . * You can also comment about issues which you noticed on the package you (pre)reviewed but which is not listed on the URL above (this criterion is somewhat ambiguous). If you have any questions, please notice to me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 7 13:28:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2006 08:28:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214311] Review Request: kcometen3 - An OpenGL screensaver for KDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611071328.kA7DSv0J027097@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kcometen3 - An OpenGL screensaver for KDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214311 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2006-11-07 08:28 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > If it's OK, can you continue with the review and I'll make those BR changes in > addition to any changes needed by the review (if any) in the next release? It > just saves having lots of minor changelog entries :-) Thanks. Ok, however do pinpoint to me these changes when you do :) MUST Items: - MUST: rpmlint's output is clean - MUST: The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. - MUST: The spec file name matches the base package %{name} - MUST: The package meets the Packaging Guidelines. - MUST: The package is licensed (GPL) with an open-source compatible license and meet other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. - MUST: The License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. - MUST: the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. - MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. - MUST: The spec file for the package is be legible. - MUST: The sources used to build the package must matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. - MUST: The package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least i386. - MUST: All build dependencies is listed in BuildRequires. - MUST: The spec file handles locales properly. - MUST: If the package does not contain shared library files located in the dynamic linker's default paths - MUST: the package is not designed to be relocatable - MUST: the package owns all directories that it creates. - MUST: the package does not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. - MUST: Permissions on files are set properly. - MUST: The package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). - MUST: The package consistently uses macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines. - MUST: The package contains code, or permissable content. This is described in detail in the code vs. content section of Packaging Guidelines. - MUST: There are no Large documentation files - MUST: %doc does not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. - MUST: There are no Header files or static libraries - MUST: The package does not contain library files with a suffix - MUST: Package does NOT contain any .la libtool archives - MUST: Package containing GUI applications includes a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. - MUST: Package does not own files or directories already owned by other packages. SHOULD Items: - SHOULD: The source package does include license text(s) as COPYING - SHOULD: mock builds succcessfully in i386. - SHOULD: The reviewer tested that the package functions as described. A package should not segfault instead of running, for example. - SHOULD: No scriptlets were used, those scriptlets must be sane. - SHOULD: No subpackages present. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 7 13:29:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2006 08:29:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214311] Review Request: kcometen3 - An OpenGL screensaver for KDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611071329.kA7DTKDV027134@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kcometen3 - An OpenGL screensaver for KDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214311 cgoorah at yahoo.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 7 14:00:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2006 09:00:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214025] Review Request: Tracker - An object database, tag/metadata database, search tool and indexer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611071400.kA7E0BWL029901@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Tracker - An object database, tag/metadata database, search tool and indexer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214025 gauret at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From gauret at free.fr 2006-11-07 09:00 EST ------- * RPM name is OK * Source tracker-0.5.1.tar.gz is the same as upstream * Builds fine in mock * rpmlints look OK * File lists look OK * Works fine Notes: * Please don't use tabs in the headers for -devel (Requires and Summary). Not a blocker of course. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 7 14:20:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2006 09:20:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 187843] Review Request: phpMyAdmin - Web based MySQL browser written in php In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611071420.kA7EKptP031752@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: phpMyAdmin - Web based MySQL browser written in php https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187843 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-11-07 09:20 EST ------- OK, I was bad, and got busy... I'll try to review this before the FPB meeting this morniing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 7 14:25:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2006 09:25:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 191968] Review Request: phpBB - A php Bulletin Board In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611071425.kA7EPHvg032120@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: phpBB - A php Bulletin Board https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191968 imlinux at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG ------- Additional Comments From imlinux at gmail.com 2006-11-07 09:25 EST ------- Sorry guys, I am conflicted about this particular package and since I don't use it any more I'm closing it so someone else can take it up if they need to. This will be the second time this package hasn't made it into extras. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 7 14:28:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2006 09:28:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 187843] Review Request: phpMyAdmin - Web based MySQL browser written in php In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611071428.kA7ES3ft032326@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: phpMyAdmin - Web based MySQL browser written in php https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187843 ------- Additional Comments From imlinux at gmail.com 2006-11-07 09:28 EST ------- Fixed issue in comment 31 by updating to newest release: http://mmcgrath.net/~mmcgrath/phpMyAdmin/phpMyAdmin.spec http://mmcgrath.net/~mmcgrath/phpMyAdmin/phpMyAdmin-2.9.1-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 7 14:33:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2006 09:33:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 187843] Review Request: phpMyAdmin - Web based MySQL browser written in php In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611071433.kA7EX81q000326@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: phpMyAdmin - Web based MySQL browser written in php https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187843 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-11-07 09:33 EST ------- 2.9.1 is a pre-release, so the Release tag should reflect that, use something like: Release: 0.1.rc2 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 7 14:53:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2006 09:53:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 187843] Review Request: phpMyAdmin - Web based MySQL browser written in php In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611071453.kA7ErxYn002167@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: phpMyAdmin - Web based MySQL browser written in php https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187843 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-11-07 09:53 EST ------- OK, rest of the package is sane, pretty straight-forward and simple, rpmlint-clean. MUSTFIX: Release tag must be of the form 0.1. I trust you'll fix that before importing, else I'll mark this APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 7 15:11:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2006 10:11:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 208169] Review Request: python-twisted-core - An asynchronous networking framework written in Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611071511.kA7FBOD3003598@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-twisted-core - An asynchronous networking framework written in Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208169 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-11-07 10:11 EST ------- Review: - package and spec naming OK - package meets guidelines - license is MIT, matches spec, text included - spec file written in English and is legible - sources match upstream - package builds ok in mock for rawhide, fc5, and fc6 (i386 and x86_64) - BR's OK - no locales or libraries to worry about - not relocatable - no directory ownership or permissions problems - %clean section present and correct - macro usage is consistent enough - code, not content - large doc directory properly split off into -doc subpackage - docs don't affect runtime - no pkgconfig files or libtool archives to worry about - not a GUI app, no desktop file needed - package appears to work OK - scriptlet is sane - subpackages have proper dependencies Nits: rpmlint output: W: python-twisted-core strange-permission twisted-dropin-cache 0775 W: python-twisted-core mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 7, tab: line 39) Both trivially fixed; there's no need to have twisted-dropin-cache executable in the SRPM as it's installed with the correct mode anyway. Also see Comment #7. Once these are addressed, I'll be happy to approve. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 7 16:35:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2006 11:35:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 208169] Review Request: python-twisted-core - An asynchronous networking framework written in Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611071635.kA7GZXLW011109@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-twisted-core - An asynchronous networking framework written in Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208169 ------- Additional Comments From thomas at apestaart.org 2006-11-07 11:35 EST ------- Thanks for the comments. New version: http://thomas.apestaart.org/download/pkg/fedora-5-i386-extras/python-twisted-core-2.4.0-5.fc5/python-twisted-core-2.4.0-5.fc5.src.rpm I don't know what the strange-permission warning is about. I changed to 0755 and it did the same. Pretty crappy warning in any case, how should one know what to do about it ? Anyway, let me know if this version satisfies you to the point of approval :) Thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 7 16:42:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2006 11:42:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 208169] Review Request: python-twisted-core - An asynchronous networking framework written in Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611071642.kA7GgRH9011800@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-twisted-core - An asynchronous networking framework written in Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208169 ------- Additional Comments From jeff at ocjtech.us 2006-11-07 11:42 EST ------- (In reply to comment #9) > > I don't know what the strange-permission warning is about. I changed to 0755 > and it did the same. Pretty crappy warning in any case, how should one know > what to do about it ? I think that it wants the source files to be 0644. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 7 16:45:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2006 11:45:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 208169] Review Request: python-twisted-core - An asynchronous networking framework written in Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611071645.kA7GjWBk012041@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-twisted-core - An asynchronous networking framework written in Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208169 ------- Additional Comments From thomas at apestaart.org 2006-11-07 11:45 EST ------- What ? That's silly! It's a script, it should be executable, I want to be able to test and execute it. Is this an important thing to fix ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 7 16:49:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2006 11:49:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 209311] Review Request: espeak - Software speech synthesizer (text-to-speech) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611071649.kA7GnXt8012334@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: espeak - Software speech synthesizer (text-to-speech) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209311 ------- Additional Comments From faucamp at csir.co.za 2006-11-07 11:49 EST ------- Thanks for the suffix clarification. :-) I've bumped the release, and did a few minor fixes: New build: Spec URL: http://dialogpalette.sourceforge.net/extras/fedora/espeak.spec SRPM URL: http://dialogpalette.sourceforge.net/extras/fedora/espeak-1.16-4.src.rpm Changes: - Modified patch steps to create backups with different suffixes - Renamed patch file extensions to .patch - Added step in %install to remove patch backup files in documentation -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 7 17:00:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2006 12:00:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214106] Review Request: php-pear-Net-FTP - Provides an OO interface to the PHP FTP functions plus some additions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611071700.kA7H04eH013195@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Net-FTP - Provides an OO interface to the PHP FTP functions plus some additions Alias: pear-Net-FTP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214106 Fedora at FamilleCollet.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 7 17:10:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2006 12:10:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 208169] Review Request: python-twisted-core - An asynchronous networking framework written in Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611071710.kA7HAMQ0014007@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-twisted-core - An asynchronous networking framework written in Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208169 ------- Additional Comments From jeff at ocjtech.us 2006-11-07 12:09 EST ------- (In reply to comment #11) > What ? That's silly! It's a script, it should be executable, I want to be able > to test and execute it. Is this an important thing to fix ? That's rpmlint for ya... Anyway, the permission of the file in the SRPM doesn't matter since you use "install -m 755" to install it during the build. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 7 18:27:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2006 13:27:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214457] New: Review Request: php-pear-Cache - Framework for caching of arbitrary data Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214457 Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Cache - Framework for caching of arbitrary data Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: Fedora at FamilleCollet.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://remi.collet.free.fr/rpms/extras/php-pear-Cache.spec SRPM URL: http://remi.collet.free.fr/rpms/extras/php-pear-Cache-1.5.5-0.1.rc4.fc6.src.rpm Mock log: http://remi.collet.free.fr/rpms/extras/php-pear-Cache-build.log Description: With the PEAR Cache you can cache the result of certain function calls, as well as the output of a whole script run or share data between applications. --- I know this extension is not maintained upstream, but is a requirement for php-pear-Services-Weather... I prefer 1.5.5rc4 (2005-09) rather than stable 1.5.4 (2004-04) but quite old. No test suite provided upstream -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 7 18:29:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2006 13:29:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214457] Review Request: php-pear-Cache - Framework for caching of arbitrary data In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611071829.kA7ITH1t021307@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Cache - Framework for caching of arbitrary data https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214457 Fedora at FamilleCollet.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |212885 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 7 18:29:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2006 13:29:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 212885] Review Request: php-pear-HTTP-Request - Provides an easy way to perform HTTP requests In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611071829.kA7ITVT6021367@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-HTTP-Request - Provides an easy way to perform HTTP requests Alias: pear-HTTP-Request https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212885 Fedora at FamilleCollet.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |214457 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 7 18:32:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2006 13:32:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213511] Review Request: gxine - Gnome frontend for the xine multimedia library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611071832.kA7IWYUA021714@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gxine - Gnome frontend for the xine multimedia library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213511 michel.salim at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #140298|0 |1 is obsolete| | ------- Additional Comments From michel.salim at gmail.com 2006-11-07 13:32 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=140580) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=140580&action=view) Updated spec There are missing BuildReqs still. The INSTALL file in the tarball describes what libraries you want to link against and why; I've added them (libXext for DPMS, dbus-glib-devel for controlling the screensaver, and libXaw-devel and nspr-devel for the Mozilla browser plugin). Versioning the dependencies is not required if the target distribution has the required packages. Also, your Requires: declarations are not necessary either. RPM automatically adds those in (try rpm -qp --requires ). Building this in mock now to test. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 7 19:12:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2006 14:12:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 212923] Review Request: php-pear-XML-RSS - RSS parser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611071912.kA7JCDCk026321@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-XML-RSS - RSS parser Alias: pear-XML-RSS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212923 Fedora at FamilleCollet.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |Fedora at FamilleCollet.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 7 19:12:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2006 14:12:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 212923] Review Request: php-pear-XML-RSS - RSS parser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611071912.kA7JClUJ026363@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-XML-RSS - RSS parser Alias: pear-XML-RSS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212923 Fedora at FamilleCollet.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 7 19:20:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2006 14:20:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 212923] Review Request: php-pear-XML-RSS - RSS parser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611071920.kA7JKWWg027077@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-XML-RSS - RSS parser Alias: pear-XML-RSS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212923 ------- Additional Comments From Fedora at FamilleCollet.com 2006-11-07 14:20 EST ------- REVIEW: * Source XML_RSS-0.9.10.tgz is the same as upstream * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * dist tag is present. * build root is correct. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible (PHP License). * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * Builds fine in mock (development). * package installs properly * rpmlint W: php-pear-XML-RSS no-documentation * final provides are sane: php-pear(XML_RSS) = 0.9.10 php-pear-XML-RSS = 0.9.10-1.fc7 * %check is not present; * owns the directories it creates (XML own by php-pear) * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * scriptlets are OK (pear install) * code, not content. * no documentation SHOULD : - requires other extensions with minimal version (php-pear(XML_Parser) >= 1.0.1) - Add the PHP license in the %doc -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 7 19:23:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2006 14:23:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 212923] Review Request: php-pear-XML-RSS - RSS parser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611071923.kA7JNxSd027433@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-XML-RSS - RSS parser Alias: pear-XML-RSS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212923 ------- Additional Comments From Fedora at FamilleCollet.com 2006-11-07 14:23 EST ------- Test provided upstream succeed (using php-PHPUnit): $ php XML_RSS_Infrastructure_Test.php TestCase XML_RSS_Infrastructure_Test->testIsXML_Parser() passed TestCase XML_RSS_Infrastructure_Test->testBug2310() passed $ php XML_RSS_Parsing_Test.php TestCase XML_RSS_Parsing_Test->testParseLocalFile() passed TestCase XML_RSS_Parsing_Test->testGetStructure() passed TestCase XML_RSS_Parsing_Test->testGetStructureFromString() passed TestCase XML_RSS_Parsing_Test->testGetChannelInfo() passed TestCase XML_RSS_Parsing_Test->testGetItems() passed TestCase XML_RSS_Parsing_Test->testGetImages() passed TestCase XML_RSS_Parsing_Test->testGetTextinputs() passed TestCase XML_RSS_Parsing_Test->testDescriptionCdata() passed -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 7 21:16:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2006 16:16:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214499] New: Review Request: multican - Remote control utility for Canon cameras Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214499 Summary: Review Request: multican - Remote control utility for Canon cameras Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jnovy at redhat.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com CC: security-response-team at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/jnovy/files/multican.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/jnovy/files/multican-0.0.4-1.src.rpm Description: multican is Canon EOS class USB remote control utility for 400D, 300D, 350D, 30D, 20D and 5D. It is possible to control more of Canon cameras in the same time up to six cameras attached. Multican allows scripted remote control of multiple cameras. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 7 21:21:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2006 16:21:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214499] Review Request: multican - Remote control utility for Canon cameras In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611072121.kA7LLQY5007287@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: multican - Remote control utility for Canon cameras https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214499 jnovy at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords|Security | CC|security-response- | |team at redhat.com | ------- Additional Comments From jnovy at redhat.com 2006-11-07 16:21 EST ------- Removing security team from Cc. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 7 21:38:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2006 16:38:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 200666] Review Request: theora-exp - Experimental theora decoder In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611072138.kA7LcmPe008847@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: theora-exp - Experimental theora decoder https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200666 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-11-07 16:38 EST ------- (In reply to comment #7) > Created an attachment (id=139996) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=139996&action=view) [edit] > suggestions for the spec file > > - Maybe better to use "svn release" instead of "cvs date" ? > - The "man version" seems to be 0.0.1 (atleast according to result library's > .so.0.0.1 ) > - The "doc/" subdir can be removed from svn source too (it can significantly > decrease the size of srpm :) ) All good ideas, thus I've applied your patch, thanks! > - Maybe enable encoding support too? No lets not the docs clearly state that this is experimental, so that is an experimental part of an experimental version, bad idea! Also the docs state that there are no guarantees files created with the encoder will keep working with newer theora versions! > - And how about tools/ subdir? Those don't look very usefull for generic purposes > - Maybe include "examples/" dir into %doc for devel subpackage? This is commonly not done unless upstream really intends for the examples to get installed, iow "make install" installs them. A new version with the suggested improvements and updated to a newer snapshot it available here: Spec File: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/theora-exp.spec SRPM File: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/theora-exp-0.0.1-0.1.svn12061.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 7 21:41:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2006 16:41:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214499] Review Request: multican - Remote control utility for Canon cameras In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611072141.kA7LfCZB009254@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: multican - Remote control utility for Canon cameras https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214499 tmraz at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tmraz at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 7 21:47:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2006 16:47:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213511] Review Request: gxine - Gnome frontend for the xine multimedia library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611072147.kA7LlvEe009846@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gxine - Gnome frontend for the xine multimedia library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213511 ------- Additional Comments From michel.salim at gmail.com 2006-11-07 16:47 EST ------- Also needed: BRs on libXtst-devel and gnome-screensaver (for some reason, the test for gnome-screensaver is done at build time, ugh). You might want to manually Require: gnome-screensaver since RPM won't pick this one up The alternative is to not BR: gnome-screensaver, but then people using gxine will get annoyed when their screensaver kicks in during playback. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 7 21:50:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2006 16:50:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213906] Review Request: Pound - a reverse proxy and load balancer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611072150.kA7Lobu9010119@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Pound - a reverse proxy and load balancer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213906 ------- Additional Comments From ruben at rubenkerkhof.com 2006-11-07 16:50 EST ------- Thanks for the review Aurelien. I've added everything you asked, except for the SELinux policy. Upstream changed to 2.1.6 in the meantime, so I did as well. http://rubenkerkhof.com/packages/pound/Pound.spec http://rubenkerkhof.com/packages/pound/Pound-2.1.6-1.src.rpm Regards, Ruben -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 7 22:55:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2006 17:55:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214055] Review Request: scummvm - Interpreter for several adventure games In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611072255.kA7Mt6In014656@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scummvm - Interpreter for several adventure games Alias: scummvm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214055 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2006-11-07 17:55 EST ------- ==== REVIEW CHECKLIST ==== - rpmlint output E: scummvm configure-without-libdir-spec Okay, covered in comment #9. Should mention why you are not using libdir in comments though. - package named according to guidelines - spec filename matches %{name} - package meets packaging guidelines - package licensed with open source compatible license - license matches actual license - license file included in %doc - spec file in American english - spec file legible - source match upstream 30a82ad466bae223875e66ee14b94904 scummvm-0.9.1.tar.bz2 - package successfully compiles and builds on FC5 x86_64 - all build dependencies listed in BR - package does not use locales - package does not contain shared libraries - package is not relocatable - package owns all directories it creates - no duplicates in %files - file permissions set properly - package contains proper %clean - macro usage consistent - package contains code - package does not contain large documentation - files in %doc do not affect runtime - no header or libraries files or devel subpackage required - no pkgconfig files - no .la files - package contains proper .desktop scriptlets - package does not own files or directories owned by other packages APPROVED ==== SHOULD ==== - please add to configure comments something about no --libdir since rpmlint gives an Error on this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 7 23:24:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2006 18:24:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 204700] Review Request: njb-sharp - C# bindings to libnjb In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611072324.kA7NOPs4016220@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: njb-sharp - C# bindings to libnjb https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204700 paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-11-07 18:24 EST ------- rpmlint is clean, builds fine in mock (x86) Review Spec file clear and in US English Consistent use of macros FC-5 macro requires (permitted) Upstream tarball md5 is the same as the packaged version License good pkgconfig included for devel package Uses DESTDIR for the install post and postun make sense clean present docs included in main package owns correct files Links with test code Okay, I'm happy with this. Please close the bug and set as NEXT RELEASE APPROVED Please remember that when FC-5 comes up to date with FC-6's mono, the macro will need to be replaced. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 7 23:29:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2006 18:29:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 212856] Review Request: php-pear-Pager - Data paging class In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611072329.kA7NTwiK016476@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Pager - Data paging class Alias: php-pear-Pager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212856 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 7 23:30:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2006 18:30:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 212898] Review Request: php-pear-Structures-DataGrid-Renderer-Pager - Renderer driver using PEAR::Pager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611072330.kA7NUB9Q016503@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Structures-DataGrid-Renderer-Pager - Renderer driver using PEAR::Pager Alias: DG-Renderer-Pager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212898 Bug 212898 depends on bug 212856, which changed state. Bug 212856 Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Pager - Data paging class https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212856 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|NEW |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 7 23:30:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2006 18:30:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214527] New: Review Request: perl-HTML-Table - Create HTML tables using simple interface Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214527 Summary: Review Request: perl-HTML-Table - Create HTML tables using simple interface Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All URL: http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: orion at cora.nwra.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec Name or Url: http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/perl-HTML-Table.spec SRPM Name or Url: http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/perl-HTML-Table-2.04a-1.fc6.src.rpm Description: HTML::Table is used to generate HTML tables for CGI scripts. By using the methods provided fairly complex tables can be created, manipulated, then printed from Perl scripts. The module also greatly simplifies creating tables within tables from Perl. It is possible to create an entire table using the methods provided and never use an HTML tag. HTML::Table also allows for creating dynamically sized tables via its addRow and addCol methods. These methods automatically resize the table if passed more cell values than will fit in the current table grid. Methods are provided for nearly all valid table, row, and cell tags specified for HTML 3.0. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 7 23:32:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2006 18:32:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214024] Review Request: perl-Net-DBus - Net::DBus Perl module In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611072332.kA7NWmrN016570@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-DBus - Net::DBus Perl module https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214024 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-11-07 18:32 EST ------- Update to 0.33.4. SRPM URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-Net-DBus-0.33.4-1.fc6.src.rpm SPEC URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-Net-DBus.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 7 23:48:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2006 18:48:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 212883] Review Request: php-pear-Net-URL - Easy parsing of URLs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611072348.kA7NmfAI017421@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Net-URL - Easy parsing of URLs Alias: php-pear-Net-URL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212883 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2006-11-07 18:48 EST ------- I need to look at your xml2changelog in more detail, unfortunately time is very limited for me at the moment, reviews and review requests piling up on me. :( Perhaps you can add something about it on the PHP Guidelines wiki page? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 7 23:49:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2006 18:49:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 212885] Review Request: php-pear-HTTP-Request - Provides an easy way to perform HTTP requests In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611072349.kA7Nn4bm017458@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-HTTP-Request - Provides an easy way to perform HTTP requests Alias: pear-HTTP-Request https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212885 Bug 212885 depends on bug 212883, which changed state. Bug 212883 Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Net-URL - Easy parsing of URLs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212883 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|NEW |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 7 23:55:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2006 18:55:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213595] Review Request: tbcload - Tcl bytecode loader In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611072355.kA7Nt4Fu017782@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tbcload - Tcl bytecode loader Alias: tbcload https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213595 paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-11-07 18:54 EST ------- rpmlint warnings/errors rpm : incoherent version number devel : no docs debug & srpm : clean builds fine in mock Review Spec file clean, uses constant macros, in US English pkgconfig not required for devel package no md5sum as it's a cvs checkout cvs naming correct contains documentation nothing missing from rpm requires uses smp_mflags Permissions fine no ownership problems As long as you fix the version number, I'll let it through APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 8 00:40:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2006 19:40:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213595] Review Request: tbcload - Tcl bytecode loader In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611080040.kA80eRU0019719@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tbcload - Tcl bytecode loader Alias: tbcload https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213595 ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2006-11-07 19:40 EST ------- Thanks for the review! Yes, I had a typo in the %changelog for the version number. Here is the spec/srpm files with the fix: http://www.kobold.org/~wart/fedora/tbcload-1.4-3.20061030cvs.src.rpm http://www.kobold.org/~wart/fedora/tbcload.spec Since this is already FE-ACCEPTED, I'll import this fixed SRPM. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 8 00:41:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2006 19:41:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214311] Review Request: kcometen3 - An OpenGL screensaver for KDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611080041.kA80fAhV019761@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kcometen3 - An OpenGL screensaver for KDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214311 ------- Additional Comments From packages at amiga-hardware.com 2006-11-07 19:41 EST ------- Thanks for the review. I'll remove the appropriate buildrequires and bump the release field before import. I'll post a link to the update spec and srpm here so you can check ;-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 8 00:47:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2006 19:47:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213596] Review Request: tclcompiler - Tcl bytecode compiler In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611080047.kA80lGZS019908@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tclcompiler - Tcl bytecode compiler Alias: tclcompiler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213596 paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-11-07 19:47 EST ------- rpmlint is clean builds cleanly in mock Good Consistent use of macros includes clean no md5 as it's a cvs checkout naming correct for cvs checkout uses smp_mflags no -devel file rpms have no dependency problems includes documentation no problems with the version number APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 8 00:59:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2006 19:59:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 212885] Review Request: php-pear-HTTP-Request - Provides an easy way to perform HTTP requests In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611080059.kA80xWML020306@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-HTTP-Request - Provides an easy way to perform HTTP requests Alias: pear-HTTP-Request https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212885 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2006-11-07 19:59 EST ------- Added versioned requires, thanks for the reviews. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 8 00:59:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2006 19:59:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 212889] Review Request: php-pear-Testing-Selenium - PHP Client for Selenium RC In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611080059.kA80xgfl020318@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Testing-Selenium - PHP Client for Selenium RC Alias: pear-Test-Selenium https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212889 Bug 212889 depends on bug 212885, which changed state. Bug 212885 Summary: Review Request: php-pear-HTTP-Request - Provides an easy way to perform HTTP requests https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212885 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|NEW |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 8 00:59:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2006 19:59:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214457] Review Request: php-pear-Cache - Framework for caching of arbitrary data In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611080059.kA80xsC5020351@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Cache - Framework for caching of arbitrary data https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214457 Bug 214457 depends on bug 212885, which changed state. Bug 212885 Summary: Review Request: php-pear-HTTP-Request - Provides an easy way to perform HTTP requests https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212885 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|NEW |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 8 01:00:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2006 20:00:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214236] Review Request: php-pear-SOAP - Simple Object Access Protocol (SOAP) Client/Server for PHP In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611080100.kA810565020368@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-SOAP - Simple Object Access Protocol (SOAP) Client/Server for PHP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214236 Bug 214236 depends on bug 212885, which changed state. Bug 212885 Summary: Review Request: php-pear-HTTP-Request - Provides an easy way to perform HTTP requests https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212885 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|NEW |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 8 01:01:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2006 20:01:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214234] Review Request: php-pear-Net-DIME - Implements Direct Internet Message Encapsulation (DIME) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611080101.kA811tVT020475@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Net-DIME - Implements Direct Internet Message Encapsulation (DIME) Alias: pear-Net-DIME https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214234 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |chris.stone at gmail.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | Alias| |pear-Net-DIME -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 8 01:08:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2006 20:08:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214457] Review Request: php-pear-Cache - Framework for caching of arbitrary data In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611080108.kA818W9r020687@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Cache - Framework for caching of arbitrary data Alias: php-pear-Cache https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214457 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |chris.stone at gmail.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | Alias| |php-pear-Cache -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 8 01:12:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2006 20:12:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213907] Review Request: tclpro - Tcl debugging environment In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611080112.kA81CEDH020875@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tclpro - Tcl debugging environment Alias: tclpro https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213907 paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-11-07 20:12 EST ------- rpmlint clean mock clean Review Good spec file in US English and clear constant use of macros includes documentation noarch fine no devel includes clean includes documentation no problems with desktop file install no problems with permissions no ownership problems correct use of cvs naming no md5sum as it's a cvs checkout software installs and runs without a problem APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 8 01:17:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2006 20:17:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213907] Review Request: tclpro - Tcl debugging environment In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611080117.kA81HnrY021109@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tclpro - Tcl debugging environment Alias: tclpro https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213907 ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2006-11-07 20:17 EST ------- Thanks for the review. Since this depends on tcldebugger and tclchecker, I'll wait until those are approved before importing this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 8 01:22:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2006 20:22:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213595] Review Request: tbcload - Tcl bytecode loader In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611080122.kA81MCOT021285@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tbcload - Tcl bytecode loader Alias: tbcload https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213595 wart at kobold.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2006-11-07 20:22 EST ------- Imported and built. Closing. Thanks again! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 8 01:22:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2006 20:22:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213596] Review Request: tclcompiler - Tcl bytecode compiler In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611080122.kA81MGsX021330@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tclcompiler - Tcl bytecode compiler Alias: tclcompiler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213596 Bug 213596 depends on bug 213595, which changed state. Bug 213595 Summary: Review Request: tbcload - Tcl bytecode loader https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213595 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 8 01:22:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2006 20:22:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213905] Review Request: tcldebugger - Tcl debugging library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611080122.kA81MHSp021343@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tcldebugger - Tcl debugging library Alias: tcldebugger https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213905 Bug 213905 depends on bug 213595, which changed state. Bug 213595 Summary: Review Request: tbcload - Tcl bytecode loader https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213595 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 8 01:22:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2006 20:22:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213904] Review Request: tclchecker - Tcl syntax checker In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611080122.kA81MSuv021367@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tclchecker - Tcl syntax checker Alias: tclchecker https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213904 Bug 213904 depends on bug 213595, which changed state. Bug 213595 Summary: Review Request: tbcload - Tcl bytecode loader https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213595 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 8 01:25:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2006 20:25:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214057] Review Request: beneath-a-steel-sky - Beneath a Steel Sky - Adventure Game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611080125.kA81Pxow021500@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: beneath-a-steel-sky - Beneath a Steel Sky - Adventure Game Alias: scummvm-bass https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214057 ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2006-11-07 20:25 EST ------- Shouldn't this package Obsolete/Providess "bass" from Livna? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 8 02:16:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2006 21:16:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213596] Review Request: tclcompiler - Tcl bytecode compiler In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611080216.kA82GI1P023048@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tclcompiler - Tcl bytecode compiler Alias: tclcompiler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213596 wart at kobold.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2006-11-07 21:16 EST ------- Imported and built. Closing. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 8 02:16:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2006 21:16:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213907] Review Request: tclpro - Tcl debugging environment In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611080216.kA82GZO9023080@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tclpro - Tcl debugging environment Alias: tclpro https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213907 Bug 213907 depends on bug 213596, which changed state. Bug 213596 Summary: Review Request: tclcompiler - Tcl bytecode compiler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213596 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 8 07:31:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2006 02:31:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214057] Review Request: beneath-a-steel-sky - Beneath a Steel Sky - Adventure Game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611080731.kA87VQxA004778@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: beneath-a-steel-sky - Beneath a Steel Sky - Adventure Game Alias: scummvm-bass https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214057 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-11-08 02:31 EST ------- I see no bass in livna, atleast not for the development branch. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 8 09:33:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2006 04:33:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213868] Review Request: libpcap - A system-independent interface for user-level packet capture In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611080933.kA89XcJJ013419@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libpcap - A system-independent interface for user-level packet capture https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213868 tmraz at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tmraz at redhat.com OtherBugsDependingO|188265 |188267 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 8 09:35:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2006 04:35:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213832] Review Request: arpwatch - Network monitoring tools for tracking IP addresses on a network In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611080935.kA89Zb6c013613@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: arpwatch - Network monitoring tools for tracking IP addresses on a network https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213832 tmraz at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tmraz at redhat.com OtherBugsDependingO|188265 |188267 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 8 09:39:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2006 04:39:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213868] Review Request: libpcap - A system-independent interface for user-level packet capture In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611080939.kA89dshX014136@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libpcap - A system-independent interface for user-level packet capture https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213868 mlichvar at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |193657 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 8 09:39:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2006 04:39:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213832] Review Request: arpwatch - Network monitoring tools for tracking IP addresses on a network In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611080939.kA89du8g014164@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: arpwatch - Network monitoring tools for tracking IP addresses on a network https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213832 mlichvar at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |193657 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 8 10:23:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2006 05:23:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214055] Review Request: scummvm - Interpreter for several adventure games In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611081023.kA8ANwOr017299@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scummvm - Interpreter for several adventure games Alias: scummvm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214055 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-11-08 05:23 EST ------- Should fixed, imported and build, Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 8 10:24:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2006 05:24:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214113] Review Request: flight-of-the-amazon-queen - Flight of the Amazon Queen - Adventure Game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611081024.kA8AOEHO017343@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: flight-of-the-amazon-queen - Flight of the Amazon Queen - Adventure Game Alias: scummvm-amazon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214113 Bug 214113 depends on bug 214055, which changed state. Bug 214055 Summary: Review Request: scummvm - Interpreter for several adventure games https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214055 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 8 10:24:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2006 05:24:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214057] Review Request: beneath-a-steel-sky - Beneath a Steel Sky - Adventure Game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611081024.kA8AOSHp017373@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: beneath-a-steel-sky - Beneath a Steel Sky - Adventure Game Alias: scummvm-bass https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214057 Bug 214057 depends on bug 214055, which changed state. Bug 214055 Summary: Review Request: scummvm - Interpreter for several adventure games https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214055 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 8 10:24:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2006 05:24:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214091] Review Request: beneath-a-steel-sky-cd - Beneath a Steel Sky - Adventure Game - CD version In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611081024.kA8AOTsN017387@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: beneath-a-steel-sky-cd - Beneath a Steel Sky - Adventure Game - CD version Alias: scummvm-bass-CD https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214091 Bug 214091 depends on bug 214055, which changed state. Bug 214055 Summary: Review Request: scummvm - Interpreter for several adventure games https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214055 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 8 10:24:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2006 05:24:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214150] Review Request: flight-of-the-amazon-queen-cd - Flight of the Amazon Queen - Adventure Game - CD version In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611081024.kA8AOUDB017399@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: flight-of-the-amazon-queen-cd - Flight of the Amazon Queen - Adventure Game - CD version Alias: scumm-amazon-CD https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214150 Bug 214150 depends on bug 214055, which changed state. Bug 214055 Summary: Review Request: scummvm - Interpreter for several adventure games https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214055 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 8 11:31:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2006 06:31:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 208169] Review Request: python-twisted-core - An asynchronous networking framework written in Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611081131.kA8BVMn4021665@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-twisted-core - An asynchronous networking framework written in Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208169 paul at city-fan.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-11-08 06:31 EST ------- OK, I'm happy with this now. As Jeffrey says in Comment #12, there's no need for the script to be executable in the SRPM, but that's not a blocker. If you can figure out at some point how to get the test suite to run from the buildroot in %check, it would be good to add that. Approved. Will you be submitting the other Twisted components for review now? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 8 12:26:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2006 07:26:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213906] Review Request: Pound - a reverse proxy and load balancer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611081226.kA8CQw1Z024769@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Pound - a reverse proxy and load balancer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213906 gauret at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |gauret at free.fr CC|gauret at free.fr | OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From gauret at free.fr 2006-11-08 07:26 EST ------- Review for release 1: * RPM name is OK * Source Pound-2.1.6.tgz is the same as upstream * This is the latest version * Builds fine in mock * File list looks OK * Config files of Pound looks OK * Works fine Minor: * rpmlint says "macro-in-%changelog". Please replace %post with %%post to avoid warning. * Please replace /usr/sbin with %{_sbindir} in Requires(pre). APPROVED You can now go on with the sponsorship procedure : http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/Contributors#GetAFedoraAccount -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 8 14:45:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2006 09:45:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 177583] Review Request: zaptel-kmod In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611081445.kA8Ej5Eq002519@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: zaptel-kmod https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177583 ------- Additional Comments From arechenberg at shermfin.com 2006-11-08 09:45 EST ------- I can't get the zaptel-kmod.spec to build in mock on Fedora Core 6. If use the following rpmbuild command to build outside of mock everything build fine: rpmbuild -ba SPECS/zaptel-kmod.spec --define 'kernel 2.6.18-1.2798.fc6' --define 'kvariants ""' --target i686 However, mock tries to rebuild the SRPM without the --define options and (I assume) rpmbuild throws: error: Package already exists: %package -n kmod-zaptel If I run the same command that mock is running to build the SRPM: rpmbuild -bs --target i686 --nodeps SPECS/zaptel-kmod.spec I receive the same error. Does anyone have an idea as to whether this error is a problem with the spec file, mock, rpmbuild or kmodtool? Here are my package versions: mock-0.6.8-4.fc6 rpm-build-4.4.2-32 rpmdevtools-5.3-1.fc6 kmodtool 0.10.11 Thanks, Andy. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 8 15:15:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2006 10:15:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 177583] Review Request: zaptel-kmod In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611081515.kA8FFdpQ005081@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: zaptel-kmod https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177583 ------- Additional Comments From jeff at ocjtech.us 2006-11-08 10:15 EST ------- There was a change in the kernel sometime after 2.6.17 that made zaptel not compile anymore. The bug was fixed in the Zaptel SVN but I don't think that the change has made its way into a released version. In any case, I'm not going to be producing new zaptel-kmod packages because the decision was made to get zaptel into the kernel package rather than as a separate RPM. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 8 15:19:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2006 10:19:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 177583] Review Request: zaptel-kmod In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611081519.kA8FJRT4005260@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: zaptel-kmod https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177583 ------- Additional Comments From arechenberg at shermfin.com 2006-11-08 10:19 EST ------- Thanks Jeff. I can build the zaptel-kmod package outside of mock just fine, so I think that this problem is with kmodtool or mock or I just don't know how to use mock correctly :) If some kind soul could talk a look at the errors above and point me in the right direction I would greatly appreciate it :) Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 8 15:25:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2006 10:25:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 177583] Review Request: zaptel-kmod In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611081525.kA8FPsH3005771@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: zaptel-kmod https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177583 ------- Additional Comments From jeff at ocjtech.us 2006-11-08 10:25 EST ------- Oh, right, sorry... working on 3 hours of sleep right now... Mock does not add any --defines or anything like that for building kernel modules. You'll need to edit the spec file and manually add macro definitions like this: %define kernel 2.6.18-1.2798.fc6 %define kvariants "" -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 8 15:29:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2006 10:29:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 177583] Review Request: zaptel-kmod In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611081529.kA8FTpVd006195@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: zaptel-kmod https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177583 ------- Additional Comments From dwmw2 at redhat.com 2006-11-08 10:29 EST ------- Unless you have Digium hardware, the right direction for now is probably OpenPBX. That's been fixed to use POSIX timers instead of relying on zaptel kernel code. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 8 15:57:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2006 10:57:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 191589] Review Request: qt4-qsa: Qt Script for Applications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611081557.kA8FvDkO009167@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qt4-qsa: Qt Script for Applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191589 ------- Additional Comments From laurent.rineau__fedora_extras at normalesup.org 2006-11-08 10:56 EST ------- (In reply to comment #29) > Change > %files devel > %defattr(0755,root,root) > %attr(0644,root,root)%{qtinc}/* > ... > > To > %files devel > %defattr(0644,root,root) > %{qtinc}/* > ... Rex, just for the record, it should have been "%defattr(0644,root,root,755)". See bug #214577. I imagine that it was a typo. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 8 16:21:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2006 11:21:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 191589] Review Request: qt4-qsa: Qt Script for Applications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611081621.kA8GLuXV011244@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qt4-qsa: Qt Script for Applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191589 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-11-08 11:21 EST ------- Heck, I *should* have simply suggested %defattr(-,root,root) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 8 16:56:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2006 11:56:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 209311] Review Request: espeak - Software speech synthesizer (text-to-speech) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611081656.kA8Gua9F014510@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: espeak - Software speech synthesizer (text-to-speech) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209311 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-11-08 11:55 EST ------- Final check. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 8 17:14:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2006 12:14:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 209311] Review Request: espeak - Software speech synthesizer (text-to-speech) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611081714.kA8HEUhk016109@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: espeak - Software speech synthesizer (text-to-speech) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209311 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-11-08 12:14 EST ------- Okay. -------------------------------------------------------------- This package (espeak) is APPROVED by me. -------------------------------------------------------------- Please go forward according to http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/Contributors to import this package to Fedora Extras. I will sponsor you when you have taken steps partway written in the page above (then I should receive the mail that you need a sponsor around 6h EST). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 8 17:21:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2006 12:21:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214057] Review Request: beneath-a-steel-sky - Beneath a Steel Sky - Adventure Game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611081721.kA8HLWHw016761@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: beneath-a-steel-sky - Beneath a Steel Sky - Adventure Game Alias: scummvm-bass https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214057 ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2006-11-08 12:21 EST ------- It's available for FC5: http://rpm.livna.org/fedora/5/i386/repodata/repoview/bass-0-0-7.20030801.lvn5.html And some people such as myself still have it installed. That is, an upgrade to FC6 or rawhide does not necessarily remove the bass package. Therefore, I think this package should Obsolete/Provides bass. I will do a formal review later today, so hold off on fixing this until I've finished the formal review incase I spot something else. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 8 18:33:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2006 13:33:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 203520] Review Request: evolution-brutus In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611081833.kA8IXn0Z025212@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: evolution-brutus Alias: evolution-brutus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203520 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-11-08 13:33 EST ------- The content of .pc file again changed...... ---------------------------------------------------------- diff -uNr evolution-brutus-devel-1.1.12-1.fc7/usr/lib/pkgconfig/libBrutus-1.0.pc evolution-brutus-devel-1.1.13-1.fc7/usr/lib/ pkgconfig/libBrutus-1.0.pc --- evolution-brutus-devel-1.1.12-1.fc7/usr/lib/pkgconfig/libBrutus-1.0.pc 2006-11-09 02:16:37.000000000 +0900 +++ evolution-brutus-devel-1.1.13-1.fc7/usr/lib/pkgconfig/libBrutus-1.0.pc 2006-11-09 01:04:44.000000000 +0900 @@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ Name: libBrutus Description: Client library for accessing Microsoft Exchange through Brutus interface -Version: 1.1.12 -Requires: libIDL-2.0 >= 0.8.5, ORBit-2.0 >= 2.14.1, libBrutusSTUBS-1.0, libBrutusSKELS-1.0, libecal-1.2 +Version: 1.1.13 +Requires: libIDL-2.0 >= 0.8.5, ORBit-2.0 >= 2.14.1, libBrutusSTUBS-1.0, libBrutusSKELS-1.0, libecal-1.2, libcamel-1.2 Libs: -L${libdir} -lBrutus-1.0 Cflags: -I${privincludedir} -I/usr/include/orbit-2.0 -I/usr/include/glib-2.0 ---------------------------------------------------------- However, I cannot find libcamel-1.2.pc in /usr/lib/pkgconfig . -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 8 18:55:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2006 13:55:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 188014] Review Request: pam_otpw - One time password support for PAM In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611081855.kA8IttFL028284@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pam_otpw - One time password support for PAM https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188014 tmraz at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG ------- Additional Comments From tmraz at redhat.com 2006-11-08 13:55 EST ------- No action from reporter. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 8 20:11:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2006 15:11:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 211807] Review Request: firefox2 - Mozilla Firefox 2.0 Web browser for FC6 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611082011.kA8KBJ7n003150@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: firefox2 - Mozilla Firefox 2.0 Web browser for FC6 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211807 ------- Additional Comments From mr.ecik at gmail.com 2006-11-08 15:11 EST ------- Gawain, ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 8 20:17:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2006 15:17:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214669] New: Review Request: logserial Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214669 Summary: Review Request: logserial Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://wdl.lug.ro/linux/rpms/logserial/logserial.spec SRPM URL: http://wdl.lug.ro/linux/rpms/logserial/logserial-0.4.2-1.src.rpm Description: Package for logging incoming bytes on asynchronous serial ports Package for logging incoming bytes on asynchronous serial ports. It was written for loging calls on our telephone central, but you can use it for any devices connected to serial ports. From version 0.4 it can be used to send data through serial line. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 8 20:29:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2006 15:29:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 188014] Review Request: pam_otpw - One time password support for PAM In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611082029.kA8KTKDZ004502@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pam_otpw - One time password support for PAM https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188014 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163779 |201449 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 8 20:34:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2006 15:34:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 211807] Review Request: firefox2 - Mozilla Firefox 2.0 Web browser for FC6 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611082034.kA8KY7DL004798@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: firefox2 - Mozilla Firefox 2.0 Web browser for FC6 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211807 ------- Additional Comments From gawain.lynch at gmail.com 2006-11-08 15:34 EST ------- You rang? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 8 20:36:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2006 15:36:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213868] Review Request: libpcap - A system-independent interface for user-level packet capture In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611082036.kA8Ka3Ps005075@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libpcap - A system-independent interface for user-level packet capture https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213868 tmraz at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|188267 |188268 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tmraz at redhat.com 2006-11-08 15:35 EST ------- Rpmlint is silent on src.rpm and built rpms and I've verified that the package conforms to the Packaging guidelines. ACCEPTED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 8 20:59:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2006 15:59:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213868] Review Request: libpcap - A system-independent interface for user-level packet capture In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611082059.kA8Kxj3s007917@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libpcap - A system-independent interface for user-level packet capture https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213868 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-11-08 15:59 EST ------- Maybe the files in doc/ and the CREDITS file should be shipped? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 8 21:23:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2006 16:23:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213868] Review Request: libpcap - A system-independent interface for user-level packet capture In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611082123.kA8LNS44009941@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libpcap - A system-independent interface for user-level packet capture https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213868 ------- Additional Comments From tmraz at redhat.com 2006-11-08 16:23 EST ------- Miroslav, do what you think is better. I don't think it is necessary to include them but maybe it would be a good idea. From the doc directory I'd choose just txt format probably. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 8 21:42:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2006 16:42:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 179758] Review Request: Eiciel (ACL editor) [Seeking Sponsor] In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611082142.kA8LgWRX011988@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Eiciel (ACL editor) [Seeking Sponsor] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=179758 markg852 at hotmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |markg852 at hotmail.com ------- Additional Comments From markg852 at hotmail.com 2006-11-08 16:42 EST ------- Why isn`t this package in the Fedora Extras repo? it seems to work fine for me.. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 8 21:54:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2006 16:54:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 212894] Review Request: libopm - Blitzed open proxy monitor library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611082154.kA8Lsthv013050@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libopm - Blitzed open proxy monitor library Alias: libopm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212894 redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de 2006-11-08 16:54 EST ------- 21226 (libopm): Build on target fedora-development-extras succeeded. 21227 (libopm): Build on target fedora-6-extras succeeded. 21228 (libopm): Build on target fedora-5-extras succeeded. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 8 22:02:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2006 17:02:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213832] Review Request: arpwatch - Network monitoring tools for tracking IP addresses on a network In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611082202.kA8M2j2U014003@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: arpwatch - Network monitoring tools for tracking IP addresses on a network https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213832 ------- Additional Comments From tmraz at redhat.com 2006-11-08 17:02 EST ------- rpmlint -v arpwatch-2.1a15-1.fc7.src.rpm I: arpwatch checking W: arpwatch strange-permission arpwatch.init 0775 Nothing important but please fix that. rpmlint -v ../RPMS/i386/arpwatch-2.1a15-1.i386.rpm I: arpwatch checking W: arpwatch conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/rc.d/init.d/arpwatch The question is whether the init script should be %config at all or not. W: arpwatch conffile-without-noreplace-flag /var/lib/arpwatch/ethercodes.dat Probably OK. E: arpwatch non-standard-uid /var/lib/arpwatch/ethercodes.dat pcap E: arpwatch non-standard-gid /var/lib/arpwatch/ethercodes.dat pcap E: arpwatch executable-marked-as-config-file /etc/rc.d/init.d/arpwatch E: arpwatch non-standard-uid /var/lib/arpwatch/arp.dat pcap E: arpwatch non-standard-gid /var/lib/arpwatch/arp.dat pcap E: arpwatch zero-length /var/lib/arpwatch/arp.dat E: arpwatch non-standard-uid /var/lib/arpwatch pcap E: arpwatch non-standard-gid /var/lib/arpwatch pcap These are OK. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 8 22:05:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2006 17:05:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213832] Review Request: arpwatch - Network monitoring tools for tracking IP addresses on a network In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611082205.kA8M53N5014249@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: arpwatch - Network monitoring tools for tracking IP addresses on a network https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213832 ------- Additional Comments From redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de 2006-11-08 17:04 EST ------- IIRC no initscript has been marked as %config, yet (which doesn't make sense anway IMHO). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 8 22:17:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2006 17:17:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213832] Review Request: arpwatch - Network monitoring tools for tracking IP addresses on a network In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611082217.kA8MHV2K014802@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: arpwatch - Network monitoring tools for tracking IP addresses on a network https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213832 ------- Additional Comments From tmraz at redhat.com 2006-11-08 17:17 EST ------- I've seen some (sshd, but I unmarked it for FC-6). So I agree that the initscript should not be %config. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 8 22:34:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2006 17:34:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 179758] Review Request: Eiciel (ACL editor) [Seeking Sponsor] In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611082234.kA8MYoWm015632@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Eiciel (ACL editor) [Seeking Sponsor] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=179758 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-11-08 17:34 EST ------- The submitter made no response to the questions brought up during review of the package (Comment #23) and so the submission was eventually abandoned. This enables any other interested party to make their own submission if they would like to maintain the package in Extras. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 8 23:04:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2006 18:04:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213832] Review Request: arpwatch - Network monitoring tools for tracking IP addresses on a network In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611082304.kA8N4rSq017869@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: arpwatch - Network monitoring tools for tracking IP addresses on a network https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213832 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pertusus at free.fr ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-11-08 18:04 EST ------- * The service related scriptlets don't follow the guidelines * the adduser followed by a chsh is a bit odd. * why isn't the useradd only done for the first install? * in %files /etc should certainly be %{sysconfdir} * just a comment, but perl one liner could be replaced by a sed, (or even a patch to be sure that it breaks if the files change in some way) * similarly the awk embedding could also be done as a patch and you'll use your scripts to regenerate the patch. * if there is a libpcap library nearby (see line 209 to 221 in configure.ac) it is used, for example in the BUILD directory. Maybe this part of the configure/configure.ac could be patched out. It shouldn't be annoying in mock, however. * maybe the oui.txt could be provided in another package and be used to regenerate ethercode.dat to have more uptodate infos. I have found http://www.mail-archive.com/debian-legal at lists.debian.org/msg32779.html on that subject. * some Requires are missing. I think /usr/sbin/sendmail or smtpdaemon (and also maybe /usr/sbin/sendmail as BuildRequires). snmpwalk is more or less required for arpsnmp, but it is better in my opinion not to have a dependency nor do something special, the sysadm should be able to figure out. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 8 23:12:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2006 18:12:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213832] Review Request: arpwatch - Network monitoring tools for tracking IP addresses on a network In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611082312.kA8NCV7M018273@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: arpwatch - Network monitoring tools for tracking IP addresses on a network https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213832 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-11-08 18:12 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > * some Requires are missing. I think /usr/sbin/sendmail or smtpdaemon > (and also maybe /usr/sbin/sendmail as BuildRequires). snmpwalk is > more or less required for arpsnmp, but it is better in my opinion not > to have a dependency nor do something special, the sysadm should be able > to figure out. I missed the arpfetch script. Since it requires snmpwalk, it should be required by arpwatch. Reading arpfetch, I see that it modifies the PATH at the beginning, I think this should be patched out. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 8 23:13:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2006 18:13:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213906] Review Request: Pound - a reverse proxy and load balancer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611082313.kA8NDfEL018319@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Pound - a reverse proxy and load balancer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213906 ------- Additional Comments From ruben at rubenkerkhof.com 2006-11-08 18:13 EST ------- Ok, I'll do that. Created a new package with the above errors fixed. http://rubenkerkhof.com/packages/pound/Pound-2.1.6-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 8 23:17:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2006 18:17:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213906] Review Request: Pound - a reverse proxy and load balancer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611082317.kA8NH49j018454@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Pound - a reverse proxy and load balancer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213906 ------- Additional Comments From ruben at rubenkerkhof.com 2006-11-08 18:17 EST ------- Sorry, wrong link. It's at http://rubenkerkhof.com/packages/pound/Pound-2.1.6-2.src.rpm and the updated spec: http://rubenkerkhof.com/packages/pound/Pound.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 8 23:18:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2006 18:18:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214057] Review Request: beneath-a-steel-sky - Beneath a Steel Sky - Adventure Game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611082318.kA8NI35T018534@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: beneath-a-steel-sky - Beneath a Steel Sky - Adventure Game Alias: scummvm-bass https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214057 ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2006-11-08 18:18 EST ------- ==== REVIEW CHECKLIST ==== - rpmlint output W: beneath-a-steel-sky no-%build-section rpmlint says you should add this section even if empty. See rpmlint -I no-%build-section. I tend to agree. While it might not make a difference now (no debuginfo package is built but we dont care) there may be something in the future which checks for this and there is no harm in adding it, so unless you have a specific technical reason to comment it, id say just uncomment it. - package named according to package naming guidelines (although a provides bass might make it easier to install) - spec filename matches package %{name} - package meets packaging guidelines - package is licensed as "Distributable" FOR FURTHER DISCUSSION ON DISTRIBUTION RIGHTS SEE: https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-extras-list/2006-November/msg00030.html - License file included in %doc - spec written in American english - spec file is legible - sources match upstream (however source0 location needs fixing) cb968b4cfdde8491069915bf15d275b3 BASS-Floppy.zip - package successfully compiles and builds on FC5 X86_64 - all dependencies listed in BR - no locales - no shared libraries - package is not relocatable - package owns all directories it creates - no duplicates in %files - file permissions set properly - package has proper %clean section - macro usage is consistent - package contains permissible content - no large documentation - no header files or static libraries - no pkgconfig files - no devel subpackage required - no .la files - package contains proper .desktop file - package does not own files or directories owned by other packages ==== MUST ==== - Change location of Source0, this file is *NOT* located on sourceforge ==== SHOULD ==== - Add Obsolete/Provides for "bass" - Uncomment %build - Add in a comment above the License tag the URL pointing to the discussion on the distribution: https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-extras-list/2006-November/msg00010.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 9 00:03:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2006 19:03:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214113] Review Request: flight-of-the-amazon-queen - Flight of the Amazon Queen - Adventure Game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611090003.kA9038Ui020940@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: flight-of-the-amazon-queen - Flight of the Amazon Queen - Adventure Game Alias: scummvm-amazon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214113 ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2006-11-08 19:03 EST ------- Hans, I tested the yesterday, and I am not seeing any text beind displayed above the people when they talk. The CD version is fine, but this version doesn't have speech yet I'm pretty sure it should atleast have text! :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 9 00:29:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2006 19:29:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 207473] Review Request: ruby-activerecord - Implements the ActiveRecord pattern for ORM In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611090029.kA90Tx66021721@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-activerecord - Implements the ActiveRecord pattern for ORM https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207473 ------- Additional Comments From dlutter at redhat.com 2006-11-08 19:29 EST ------- Updated to latest upstream: Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/dlutter/yum/spec/ruby-activerecord.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/dlutter/yum/SRPMS/ruby-activerecord-1.14.4-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 9 00:39:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2006 19:39:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214311] Review Request: kcometen3 - An OpenGL screensaver for KDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611090039.kA90d77L022284@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kcometen3 - An OpenGL screensaver for KDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214311 ------- Additional Comments From packages at amiga-hardware.com 2006-11-08 19:39 EST ------- Updated version: http://dribble.org.uk/reviews/kcometen3.spec http://dribble.org.uk/reviews/kcometen3-1.1-4.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 9 01:48:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2006 20:48:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214730] New: Review Request: pungi - Distribution compose tool Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214730 Summary: Review Request: pungi - Distribution compose tool Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jkeating at redhat.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://linux.duke.edu/projects/pungi/?f=6e580939b460;file=pungi.spec;style=raw SRPM URL: http://linux.duke.edu/projects/pungi/release/pungi-0.1.0-1.src.rpm Description: A tool to create anaconda based installation trees/isos of a set of rpms. rpmlint complains about non-executable scripts. I have some code in the python modules that allows them to be executed on their own for testing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 9 05:53:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2006 00:53:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214746] New: Review Request: eiciel - Graphical access control list (ACL) editor Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214746 Summary: Review Request: eiciel - Graphical access control list (ACL) editor Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All URL: http://rofi.pinchito.com/eiciel OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com SRPM URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/eiciel-0.9.2-6.fc6.src.rpm SPEC URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/eiciel.spec Description: Graphical editor for access control lists (ACL) and extended attributes (XATTR), either as an extension within Nautilus, or as a standalone utility. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 9 05:53:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2006 00:53:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214746] Review Request: eiciel - Graphical access control list (ACL) editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611090553.kA95rJIw004488@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eiciel - Graphical access control list (ACL) editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214746 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |163776 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 9 05:53:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2006 00:53:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 179758] Review Request: Eiciel (ACL editor) [Seeking Sponsor] In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611090553.kA95rqEL004525@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Eiciel (ACL editor) [Seeking Sponsor] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=179758 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|NOTABUG |DUPLICATE ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-11-09 00:53 EST ------- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 214746 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 9 05:54:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2006 00:54:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214746] Review Request: eiciel - Graphical access control list (ACL) editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611090554.kA95sRmU004575@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eiciel - Graphical access control list (ACL) editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214746 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora at adslpipe.co.uk ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-11-09 00:54 EST ------- *** Bug 179758 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 9 06:00:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2006 01:00:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214746] Review Request: eiciel - Graphical access control list (ACL) editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611090600.kA9601bH004723@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eiciel - Graphical access control list (ACL) editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214746 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-11-09 01:00 EST ------- This is a resurrection of a stalled review. The issues brought up during the actual review (comment 23 of bug 179758) were addressed; otherwise the spec/package is the same. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 9 06:37:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2006 01:37:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214113] Review Request: flight-of-the-amazon-queen - Flight of the Amazon Queen - Adventure Game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611090637.kA96biEw005752@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: flight-of-the-amazon-queen - Flight of the Amazon Queen - Adventure Game Alias: scummvm-amazon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214113 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-11-09 01:37 EST ------- Thats probably because you ran the CD version first and it settings where saved and are now used by the floppy version. Try cleaning out ~/.scummvm/queen.* Or press F1 to goto to the load/save menu and try enabling the text. Funny it can be disabled in the floppy version though :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 9 09:19:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2006 04:19:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214730] Review Request: pungi - Distribution compose tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611090919.kA99Jccx015041@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pungi - Distribution compose tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214730 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-11-09 04:19 EST ------- * name right * follow packaging guidelines * match uptream 6fab9b1b9979aa59b9db5880abfe6136 pungi-0.1.0.tar.gz * sane provides: Provides: config(pungi) = 0.1.0-1 * specfile simple and legible * %files section right * rpmlint says: E: pungi non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/pypungi/pungi.py 0644 E: pungi non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/pypungi/splittree.py 0644 E: pungi non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/pypungi/gather.py 0644 This is ignorable, as you explained above. However wouldn't it make sense to have wrapper around those scripts, named for example pungi-gather or the like, wouldn't it make sense to call them independently? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 9 09:22:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2006 04:22:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214730] Review Request: pungi - Distribution compose tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611090922.kA99Ml2i015387@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pungi - Distribution compose tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214730 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |pertusus at free.fr OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-11-09 04:22 EST ------- The comment about wrappers is not a blocker, so it is APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 9 09:24:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2006 04:24:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214057] Review Request: beneath-a-steel-sky - Beneath a Steel Sky - Adventure Game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611090924.kA99OURi015542@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: beneath-a-steel-sky - Beneath a Steel Sky - Adventure Game Alias: scummvm-bass https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214057 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-11-09 04:24 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > ==== MUST ==== > - Change location of Source0, this file is *NOT* located on sourceforge > > ==== SHOULD ==== > - Add Obsolete/Provides for "bass" > - Uncomment %build > - Add in a comment above the License tag the URL pointing to the discussion on > the distribution: > https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-extras-list/2006-November/msg00010.html > Thanks! All fixed / done, new version is here: Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/beneath-a-steel-sky.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/beneath-a-steel-sky-0.0348-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 9 09:26:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2006 04:26:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214730] Review Request: pungi - Distribution compose tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611090926.kA99QwxQ015732@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pungi - Distribution compose tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214730 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-11-09 04:26 EST ------- Maybe you coule let one day for other reviewers to comment on before importing, such that other people have time to raise concerns. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 9 09:39:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2006 04:39:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213832] Review Request: arpwatch - Network monitoring tools for tracking IP addresses on a network In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611090939.kA99dL9k016852@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: arpwatch - Network monitoring tools for tracking IP addresses on a network https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213832 ------- Additional Comments From tmraz at redhat.com 2006-11-09 04:39 EST ------- > * The service related scriptlets don't follow the guidelines What do you mean? > * the adduser followed by a chsh is a bit odd. This was probably some preventive action for the case when the user was already there. I'd leave it on packager to decide if chsh should be removed or not. > * in %files /etc should certainly be %{sysconfdir} I've overlooked that. Miroslav, please correct that. > * if there is a libpcap library nearby (see line 209 to 221 in configure.ac) it is used, for example in the BUILD directory. Maybe this part of the configure/configure.ac could be patched out. It shouldn't be annoying in mock, however. I've noticed that too, I don't think it must be fixed but it would be good idea. > * some Requires are missing. I think /usr/sbin/sendmail or smtpdaemon > (and also maybe /usr/sbin/sendmail as BuildRequires). snmpwalk is > more or less required for arpsnmp, but it is better in my opinion not > to have a dependency nor do something special, the sysadm should be able > to figure out. I agree that sendmail probably should be required. smtpdaemon not as it is definitely optional thing and arpwatch is usable without it. I don't think that the package should require snmpwalk. This is unnecessary bloat in case someone wants to use just arpwatch. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 9 09:51:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2006 04:51:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214499] Review Request: multican - Remote control utility for Canon cameras In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611090951.kA99pgZ7017602@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: multican - Remote control utility for Canon cameras https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214499 ------- Additional Comments From tmraz at redhat.com 2006-11-09 04:51 EST ------- rpmlint -v ../RPMS/i386/multican-0.0.4-1.i386.rpm I: multican checking W: multican incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.0.4 0.0.4-1 You must include the release in the changelog entry. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 9 09:53:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2006 04:53:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213832] Review Request: arpwatch - Network monitoring tools for tracking IP addresses on a network In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611090953.kA99rqMk017791@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: arpwatch - Network monitoring tools for tracking IP addresses on a network https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213832 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-11-09 04:53 EST ------- (In reply to comment #6) > > * The service related scriptlets don't follow the guidelines > What do you mean? The scriptlet are not the same than in http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets#head-97754e2c646616c5f6222f0cfc6923c60765133e It may not be problematic, those scriptlets could even be better, but maybe this could be argued. > > * the adduser followed by a chsh is a bit odd. > This was probably some preventive action for the case when the user was already > there. I'd leave it on packager to decide if chsh should be removed or not. It seems a bit bad to me. I don't think it is a good idea to modify the user after the first install. The sysadm may have changed something on purpose. > > * if there is a libpcap library nearby (see line 209 to 221 > in configure.ac) it is used, for example in the BUILD directory. > Maybe this part of the configure/configure.ac could be patched out. > It shouldn't be annoying in mock, however. > I've noticed that too, I don't think it must be fixed but it would be good idea. This is definitely not a blocker, but an improvement. > I agree that sendmail probably should be required. smtpdaemon not as it is > definitely optional thing and arpwatch is usable without it. smtpdaemon is more or less similar with /usr/sbin/sendmail, in fact the semantics of this virtual provide is not clear to me. /usr/sbin/sendmail is certainly better anyway. > I don't think that the package should require snmpwalk. This is unnecessary > bloat in case someone wants to use just arpwatch. In that case arpfetch shouldn't be installed but in %doc. Otherwise there is a non-functional script installed. Another option would be to document prominently in fedora specific place (%description or README.fedora for example) that snmpwalk is needed for proper functionning. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 9 09:58:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2006 04:58:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214751] New: Review Request: xview - XView widget libraries Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214751 Summary: Review Request: xview - XView widget libraries Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: Christian.Iseli at licr.org QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: ftp://ftp.licr.org/pub/xview.spec SRPM URL: ftp://ftp.licr.org/pub/xview-3.2-0.1.p4.src.rpm Description: XView (X Window-System-based Visual/Integrated Environment for Workstations) is a user-interface toolkit to support interactive, graphics-based applications running under the X Window System. XView provides a set of pre-built, user-interface objects such as canvases, scrollbars, menus, and control panels. The appearance and functionality of these objects follow the OPEN LOOK Graphical User Interface (GUI) specification. XView features an object-oriented style Application Programmer's Interface (API) that is straightforward and easy to learn. This is pretty much vintage stuff :-) There are a few useful pieces of scientific software that depend on the xview package. I intend to submit some of them over time, starting with treetool. This review request is to get the ball rolling. Some discussion already occured on f-e-l: https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-extras-list/2006-October/msg00643.html It looks like we will have to exclude 64-bit architectures for now, and use the 32-bit packages on x86_64. Hans, please add your patches to this ticket... tia :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 9 09:58:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2006 04:58:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214499] Review Request: multican - Remote control utility for Canon cameras In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611090958.kA99wcmm018289@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: multican - Remote control utility for Canon cameras https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214499 ------- Additional Comments From jnovy at redhat.com 2006-11-09 04:58 EST ------- Fixed. The new spec and srpm is now updated. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 9 10:03:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2006 05:03:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214499] Review Request: multican - Remote control utility for Canon cameras In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611091003.kA9A3dNx018678@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: multican - Remote control utility for Canon cameras https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214499 tmraz at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tmraz at redhat.com 2006-11-09 05:03 EST ------- OK, rpmlint is silent now. Also the package seems to meet the packaging guidelines and it compiles fine here. I cannot verify functionality of it as I don't have any Canon EOS Digital around, but I believe you that it works fine :-) ACCEPTED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 9 10:09:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2006 05:09:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 203520] Review Request: evolution-brutus In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611091009.kA9A9UdO019159@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: evolution-brutus Alias: evolution-brutus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203520 ------- Additional Comments From colding at omesc.com 2006-11-09 05:09 EST ------- No, that was an annoying typo. I was simply used to the .pc file beeing named lib*.pc. Sorry about that. It will get fixed today. Another thing for this day is that I am diving into a few of the non-reviewed packages and try to give some constructive critisism. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 9 10:11:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2006 05:11:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214751] Review Request: xview - XView widget libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611091011.kA9AB5KJ019286@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xview - XView widget libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214751 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pertusus at free.fr ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-11-09 05:11 EST ------- Maybe it would be interesting to submit treetool before the review is completed such that we can test that xview works correctly on treetools, otherwise there is no test case. I'll follow the review, but I'd like to avoid formally reviewing the package for obvious reasons... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 9 10:16:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2006 05:16:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214751] Review Request: xview - XView widget libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611091016.kA9AGCVL019548@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xview - XView widget libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214751 ------- Additional Comments From Christian.Iseli at licr.org 2006-11-09 05:16 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > Maybe it would be interesting to submit treetool before the > review is completed such that we can test that xview works > correctly on treetools, otherwise there is no test case. Will do ASAP. I'm currently waiting for the OA to clarify the license terms (he already said in PM he has no problem to put this in FE, but hasn't decided yet which exact license to use)... In the meantime, there are a few clients (cmdtool, shelltool, clock) already included in the xview package. > I'll follow the review, but I'd like to avoid formally reviewing > the package for obvious reasons... Sure, np. Thanks for putting it together in the first place. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 9 11:21:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2006 06:21:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 212692] New package: libgnomekbd In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611091121.kA9BLjU7025451@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: New package: libgnomekbd https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212692 colding at omesc.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |colding at omesc.com ------- Additional Comments From colding at omesc.com 2006-11-09 06:21 EST ------- Not sure if this is the right place, but todays yum update gave me: Transaction Check Error: file /etc/gconf/schemas/desktop_gnome_peripherals_keyboard_xkb.schemas from install of libgnomekbd-2.17.2-1.fc7 conflicts with file from package control-center-2.17.1-2.fc7 -- jules -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 9 11:48:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2006 06:48:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 211726] Review Request: gcstar - Personal collections manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611091148.kA9BmNVq027021@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gcstar - Personal collections manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211726 tian at c-sait.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 9 12:10:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2006 07:10:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 203520] Review Request: evolution-brutus In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611091210.kA9CA8eJ028335@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: evolution-brutus Alias: evolution-brutus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203520 ------- Additional Comments From colding at omesc.com 2006-11-09 07:10 EST ------- OK, the libBrutus.pc.in typo has been fixed as well as an issue with the handling of passwords with trailing whitespace. New files here: SRPM: http://www.omesc.com/content/downloads/dist/Fedora%20Core%20Development/SRPMS/evolution-brutus-1.1.14-1.src.rpm SPEC: http://www.omesc.com/content/downloads/dist/Fedora%20Core%20Development/SPECS/evolution-brutus.spec Now of to do some pre-reviews... Best regards, jules -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 9 12:11:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2006 07:11:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214499] Review Request: multican - Remote control utility for Canon cameras In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611091211.kA9CBSwI028423@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: multican - Remote control utility for Canon cameras https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214499 jnovy at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Group|security | ------- Additional Comments From jnovy at redhat.com 2006-11-09 07:11 EST ------- multican is now imported and built. Thanks for review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 9 12:16:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2006 07:16:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214764] New: Review Request: hunspell - split hunspell out from OpenOffice.org Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214764 Summary: Review Request: hunspell - split hunspell out from OpenOffice.org Product: Fedora Core Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: caolanm at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/hunspell/hunspell.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/hunspell/hunspell-1.1.4-1.src.rpm Description: hunspell is the spellchecker that OpenOffice.org uses, currently it's bundled as part of OOo, this splits it out to make it available for other applications to use -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 9 13:46:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2006 08:46:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214730] Review Request: pungi - Distribution compose tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611091346.kA9DkOsn003738@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pungi - Distribution compose tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214730 ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-11-09 08:46 EST ------- A wrapper doesn't quite make sense, since these are python modules. If you wanted just the functionality of gather, you'd probably use yumdownloader or repotrack instead, or you'd import the pypungi.gather module into your python script and use it there. For pypungi.pungi, there is a bit more of a chance of wanting to run it standalone, but since it is a module, you can do that (: Anyconcerns raised can be fixed once I bring it in. Built for devel, branch for FC-6 requested. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 9 13:57:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2006 08:57:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 212692] New package: libgnomekbd In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611091357.kA9DvVx7004948@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: New package: libgnomekbd https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212692 ------- Additional Comments From colding at omesc.com 2006-11-09 08:57 EST ------- OK, it works now. Thanks, jules -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 9 14:10:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2006 09:10:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 210007] Review Request: - In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611091410.kA9EATDt006317@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210007 ------- Additional Comments From Nadia.Derbey at bull.net 2006-11-09 09:10 EST ------- Konrad, sorry for the delay but I have been out of my office for almost 2 weeks! (In reply to comment #12) > 1). > Licenses. The spec files says GPL v2.1, the tests,scripts, and templates usE GPL > v2.0 and the lib uses LGPG. > Fixed the License: field in the spec file + many source files where the license text was completely wrong (it was a big mess and don't know where I got that text from :-( ). > 2). rpmlint: > > [konrad at dyn448114 i386]$ rpmlint -v libtune-devel-0.10-2.i386.rpm > I: libtune-devel checking > W: libtune-devel service-default-enabled /etc/rc.d/init.d/chtunedb > W: libtune-devel incoherent-init-script-name chtunedb > > I would consider the two above to be harmless and intentional. Right: W1: the service has to be enabled by default W2: I thought that calling that binary libtune or libtuned was not meaningful enough > > 3). It fails compilation on 64-bit (this FC5-x86_64) > Fixed New links are: Spec URL: http://libtune.sourceforge.net/specfiles/FE3/libtune.spec SRPM URL: http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/libtune/libtune-0.10-3.src.rpm?download -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 9 15:00:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2006 10:00:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213832] Review Request: arpwatch - Network monitoring tools for tracking IP addresses on a network In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611091500.kA9F0uCk010352@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: arpwatch - Network monitoring tools for tracking IP addresses on a network https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213832 ------- Additional Comments From mlichvar at redhat.com 2006-11-09 10:00 EST ------- Ok, thanks for the input. New spec: http://people.redhat.com/jnovy/files/arpwatch.spec New SRPM: http://people.redhat.com/jnovy/files/arpwatch-2.1a15-1.1.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 9 15:01:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2006 10:01:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214124] Review Request: bogl - a graphics library and an Unicode terminal emulator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611091501.kA9F1U5X010401@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bogl - a graphics library and an Unicode terminal emulator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214124 colding at omesc.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |colding at omesc.com ------- Additional Comments From colding at omesc.com 2006-11-09 10:01 EST ------- ----------------------------------------------------------- I'm not a member of sponsors so I can only do a pre-review. ----------------------------------------------------------- With that out of the way... >From http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines: * rpmlint is not silent. bash-3.1$ rpmlint ./bogl-0.1.18-12.i386.rpm W: bogl no-url-tag bash-3.1$ rpmlint ./bogl-bterm-0.1.18-12.i386.rpm W: bogl-bterm no-url-tag bash-3.1$ rpmlint ./bogl-debuginfo-0.1.18-12.i386.rpm W: bogl-debuginfo no-url-tag bash-3.1$ rpmlint ./bogl-devel-0.1.18-12.i386.rpm W: bogl-devel no-url-tag W: bogl-devel no-documentation bash-3.1$ rpmlint ../../SRPMS/bogl-0.1.18-12.src.rpm W: bogl no-url-tag I can see from the comment in the specthat there really aren't any URL presently, but I think that one should be provided/created. * There is no use of the %find_lang macro in the spec. There are no locale files so maybe this is not needed anyway? * /usr/share/bogl is not owned by any package (use %dir) * /usr/include/bogl is not owned by any package (use %dir) * You are using: "Requires: bogl = %{epoch}:%{version}-%{release}". Why not: "Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release}" ? Se also my comment about the epoch tag below. >From http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines: * Timestamps: Consider using "install -p" and "cp -p". You could use INSTALL="install -c -p" in your make install command Other issues: * I can't see any resaon why you need to use the epoch tag. Version numbers like 0.1.18 are not hard for RPM to parse at all. See e.g. here: http://www.rpm.org/max-rpm-snapshot/s1-rpm-inside-tags.html#S3-RPM-INSIDE-REQUIRES-TAG * There is no COPYING file in the top-level source directory. There should be. * The following files do not have a license notice: - bogl-bgf.c - bogl-bgf.h - bogl-term.h - boxes.h - bterm.ti - mergebdf - README - README.BOGL-bterm - reduce-font.c - utils/add_changelog_line * There is no explicit copyright notice in any of the source files _except_ for the following: - bogl-term.c - bogl-vga16.c - *.bdf * The *.bdf files are not under the GPL, but they appear to be free enough * bogl does not use autoconf/automake. I really do find that the old Makefile way is to inflexible. * Please use "Release: 12%{?dist}" not "Release: 12" * There is a lot of compile warnings. These warning should be reviewd for seriousness. I know this is just me being overly strict, but I would prefer the Werror compile flag to be mandatory for all F[C,E] packages. HTH, jules -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 9 15:02:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2006 10:02:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 203520] Review Request: evolution-brutus In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611091502.kA9F2lpc010551@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: evolution-brutus Alias: evolution-brutus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203520 ------- Additional Comments From colding at omesc.com 2006-11-09 10:02 EST ------- I just did a pre-review of this one: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214124 -- jules -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 9 15:06:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2006 10:06:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 200666] Review Request: theora-exp - Experimental theora decoder In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611091506.kA9F6ioL010794@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: theora-exp - Experimental theora decoder https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200666 dmitry at butskoy.name changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From dmitry at butskoy.name 2006-11-09 10:06 EST ------- * the "-devel" package owns "/usr/include/theora" directory, which is questionable. It seems that libtheora-devel should own this, but currently this dir is not owned at all. Anyway, IMO, an Extras package should not own anything already present in the Core... * "-devel" package must "Requires: pkgconfig" as it has .pc file * Suggestion: add some words to %description that "theora" is related to "video codec" etc. It could help newbies a little... :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 9 15:10:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2006 10:10:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214025] Review Request: Tracker - An object database, tag/metadata database, search tool and indexer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611091510.kA9FAcfd011190@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Tracker - An object database, tag/metadata database, search tool and indexer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214025 Bug 214025 depends on bug 214112, which changed state. Bug 214112 Summary: Remove obsoletes on tracker https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214112 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |RAWHIDE Status|NEW |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 9 15:11:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2006 10:11:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 200666] Review Request: theora-exp - Experimental theora decoder In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611091511.kA9FBLNE011250@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: theora-exp - Experimental theora decoder https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200666 dmitry at butskoy.name changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |dmitry at butskoy.name -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 9 15:44:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2006 10:44:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214124] Review Request: bogl - a graphics library and an Unicode terminal emulator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611091544.kA9FiIHE014776@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bogl - a graphics library and an Unicode terminal emulator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214124 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 9 15:47:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2006 10:47:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214025] Review Request: Tracker - An object database, tag/metadata database, search tool and indexer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611091547.kA9FlcQn015063@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Tracker - An object database, tag/metadata database, search tool and indexer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214025 ------- Additional Comments From dakingun at gmail.com 2006-11-09 10:47 EST ------- Thanks for the reviews. Now that the mikmod issue had been resolved (presently only on rawhide), I'll go ahead and import it into Extras and make the correction of not using tabs there. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 9 15:48:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2006 10:48:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 203520] Review Request: evolution-brutus In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611091548.kA9FmLsa015152@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: evolution-brutus Alias: evolution-brutus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203520 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-11-09 10:48 EST ------- Well, * I re-reviewed evolution-brutus and this time it is okay. * Well, for bogl review (bug 214124), I have not yet checked this concretely, however I have somewhat different opinion from you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 9 15:48:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2006 10:48:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214124] Review Request: bogl - a graphics library and an Unicode terminal emulator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611091548.kA9FmaUj015210@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bogl - a graphics library and an Unicode terminal emulator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214124 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-11-09 10:48 EST ------- I will check this package later as I maintain jfbterm, which is mainly used by Japanese people to display Kanji characters on Linux frame buffers. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 9 15:58:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2006 10:58:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 212974] Review Request: aspell-ar - Word list/dictionaries for Arabic In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611091558.kA9Fw6ar016126@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aspell-ar - Word list/dictionaries for Arabic https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212974 ------- Additional Comments From notting at redhat.com 2006-11-09 10:58 EST ------- Having it reviewed for Extras is fine to get the review done. I suspect enough things will change around Core + Extras soon enough that we can handle the question of 'where' later. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 9 16:04:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2006 11:04:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 177619] Review Request: python-nltk-lite: Python libraries and programs for natural language processing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611091604.kA9G4P3O016953@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-nltk-lite: Python libraries and programs for natural language processing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177619 michel.salim at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|NOTABUG |DUPLICATE ------- Additional Comments From michel.salim at gmail.com 2006-11-09 11:03 EST ------- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 213192 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 9 16:04:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2006 11:04:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213192] Review Request: {FE-{4, 5, 6}, devel}python-nltk_lite - Natural Language Toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611091604.kA9G4QvN016963@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: {FE-{4,5,6},devel}python-nltk_lite - Natural Language Toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213192 michel.salim at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ivazquez at ivazquez.net ------- Additional Comments From michel.salim at gmail.com 2006-11-09 11:04 EST ------- *** Bug 177619 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 9 16:22:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2006 11:22:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213192] Review Request: python-nltk_lite - Natural Language Toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611091622.kA9GMAWp018627@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-nltk_lite - Natural Language Toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213192 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: {FE- |Review Request: python- |{4,5,6},devel}python- |nltk_lite - Natural Language |nltk_lite - Natural Language|Toolkit |Toolkit | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 9 16:57:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2006 11:57:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214818] New: Review Request: audacious+audacious-plugins - A GTK2 based media player similar to xmms Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214818 Summary: Review Request: audacious+audacious-plugins - A GTK2 based media player similar to xmms Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: redhat-bugzilla at camperquake.de QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.skytale.net/files/audacious/audacious.spec SRPM URL: http://www.skytale.net/files/audacious/audacious-1.2.1-0.5.sky.src.rpm Spec URL: http://www.skytale.net/files/audacious/audacious-plugins.spec SRPM URL: http://www.skytale.net/files/audacious/audacious-plugins-1.2.2-0.5.sky.src.rpm Description: Audacious is a media player that currently uses a skinned user interface based on Winamp 2.x skins. It is based on ("forked off") BMP. This is a re-review request for audacious and audacious-plugins. I already maintain audacious in FE. For this version upstream has split the original single package into two, one containing the player and one containing the plugins. Due to this largish change both packages are offered for rereview here before the new version is imported into FE. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 9 17:12:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2006 12:12:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 177828] Review Request: python-libtidy - Python bindings for libtidy In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611091712.kA9HCkoQ023895@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-libtidy - Python bindings for libtidy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177828 roozbeh at farsiweb.info changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|roozbeh at farsiweb.info |nobody at fedoraproject.org CC| |roozbeh at farsiweb.info ------- Additional Comments From roozbeh at farsiweb.info 2006-11-09 12:12 EST ------- I'm so sorry, I guess I was too busy to take care of this, and it will remain so for a while. De-assigning from myself. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 9 17:26:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2006 12:26:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214830] New: Review Request: Limph - PHP network host monitor Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214830 Summary: Review Request: Limph - PHP network host monitor Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: limb at jcomserv.net QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://gryffindor.jcomserv.net/extras/limph/limph.spec SRPM URL: http://gryffindor.jcomserv.net/extras/limph/limph-1.9.3-1.src.rpm Description: Limph is a PHP5 compatible network host monitor with host agent support. This is my second submitted package, and I am still unsponsored. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 9 17:30:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2006 12:30:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 207793] Review Request: flite - Small, fast speech synthesis engine (text-to-speech) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611091730.kA9HU2fO026330@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: flite - Small, fast speech synthesis engine (text-to-speech) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207793 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-11-09 12:29 EST ------- Removing NEEDSPONSOR blocker, as I am sponsoring (bug 209311). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 9 17:30:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2006 12:30:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214830] Review Request: Limph - PHP network host monitor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611091730.kA9HUpKW026440@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Limph - PHP network host monitor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214830 limb at jcomserv.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: Limph - PHP |Review Request: Limph - PHP |network host monitor |network host monitor OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 9 17:52:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2006 12:52:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 209311] Review Request: espeak - Software speech synthesizer (text-to-speech) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611091752.kA9Hqdtq030009@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: espeak - Software speech synthesizer (text-to-speech) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209311 ------- Additional Comments From faucamp at csir.co.za 2006-11-09 12:52 EST ------- Thanks for the review and sponsorship! I have imported the package and requested branches for FC-5 and FC-6. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 9 17:56:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2006 12:56:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214124] Review Request: bogl - a graphics library and an Unicode terminal emulator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611091756.kA9Hu44j030393@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bogl - a graphics library and an Unicode terminal emulator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214124 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-11-09 12:55 EST ------- Well, for my viewpoint: 1. From http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines : * Licensing * Rpmlint - Well, rpmlint complains about no-url-tag. It seems that this package is currently maintained by debian people. I recommend that you add the URL which shows that this package is now maintained by debian. Also, you should add "debian/copyright" to main package AND -bterm package as -bterm package does not require main package. * Tags - Use %?dist tag. - I recommend using %_datadir instead of /usr/share. * Compiler flags - fedora specific compilation flags are not passed. ------------------------------------------------------ + make DESTDIR=/var/tmp/bogl-0.1.18-12-root-mockbuild libdir=/usr/lib install cc -O2 -g -D_GNU_SOURCE -Wall -D_GNU_SOURCE -DBOGL_CFB_FB=1 -DBOGL_VGA16_FB=1 -o bdftobogl.o -c bdftobogl.c cc bdftobogl.o bogl.o bogl-font.o bogl-cfb.o bogl-pcfb.o bogl-tcfb.o bogl-vga16.o -o bdftobogl ./bdftobogl helvB10.bdf > helvB10.c cc -O2 -g -D_GNU_SOURCE -Wall -D_GNU_SOURCE -DBOGL_CFB_FB=1 -DBOGL_VGA16_FB=1 -o helvB10.lo -fPIC -c helvB10.c ./bdftobogl helvB12.bdf > helvB12.c cc -O2 -g -D_GNU_SOURCE -Wall -D_GNU_SOURCE -DBOGL_CFB_FB=1 -DBOGL_VGA16_FB=1 -o helvB12.lo -fPIC -c helvB12.c ./bdftobogl helvR10.bdf > helvR10.c ...... ------------------------------------------------------ * Timestamps I always recommend to keep timestamps of - text files (including header files) - image files - etc to show clearly when they are created/modified. For the case of this package, keeping timestamps of header files in -devel package is preferable. For this case, the usual method 'make INSTALL="install -c -p" install cannot be used. Try like: sed -i -e 's|install|install -p|g' Makefile or so. 2. From http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines : = Nothing. 3. Other things I have noticed: * For bogl-bterm - Well, Japanese people (including me) always complain about bterm as this software (bterm) is not useful for non-root users because *it seems* bterm requires device access right to /dev/tty0 . (I have not checked the whole source code of bterm and perhaps it is impossible for me). What do you think of this? + kon2 (which was in Core till FC5, however it was removed for FC6) used to setuid on kon binary. + For jfbterm, I decided to use console.perms method. (through long discussion with the original maintainer) This method allows the FIRST user to use CUI frame buffer to gain device access right. + or should we leave this as it was? +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ In my opinion, the following are okay. = %find_lang There is no gettext mo files so %find_lang macro is not needed, this is correct. = /usr/share/bogl This is correctly owned by bogl-bterm = /usr/include/bogl This is correctly owned by bogl-bterm = You are using: "Requires: bogl = %{epoch}:%{version}-%{release}" This is correct when using epoch. = I can't see any resaon why you need to use the epoch tag For this package, epoch is needed as Epoch was already used when this package was in Fedora Core. = source files license issue: Well, surely some of the source files are not explicitly licensed, however, for now I trust that these are licensed under GPL accroding to debian/copyright. = bogl does not use autoconf/automake In my opinion, autoconf/automake should not be used unless it is unavoidable and there is no problem for this package. = There is a lot of compile warnings Well, compilation warnings should be avoided as well as possible, however my opinion is this is not a blocker as long as the warnings are not _crucial_ . I maintain xscreensaver, of which the compilation warning canNOT be avoided because of gtk2 "bug". Jules, any comments? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 9 18:13:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2006 13:13:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 209311] Review Request: espeak - Software speech synthesizer (text-to-speech) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611091813.kA9IDBYc032408@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: espeak - Software speech synthesizer (text-to-speech) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209311 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-11-09 13:13 EST ------- Okay, I saw by mail that you successfully imported espeak to FE-devel CVS branch. Well, usually SyncNeeded process may take some time (one or two day) to be completed by the admin of CVS. Before waiting it (perhaps now), you should be able to send a build queue for FE-devel. Try it accroding to http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/Contributors . When you successfully built espeak on FE-devel, you can close this package as "CLOSED NEXTRELEASE" (some people suspend to close the review request till rebuild for all branches are done, however I think that you can close this when * rebuild for FE-devel is done * SyncNeeded is requested for other branches ) ------------------------------------------------ NOTE: please don't forget to add espeak to comps/comps-fe?.xml.in when building espeak is done, see: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/CompsXml and... please also check my review for flite (bug 207793). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 9 18:13:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2006 13:13:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214057] Review Request: beneath-a-steel-sky - Beneath a Steel Sky - Adventure Game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611091813.kA9IDGLN032439@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: beneath-a-steel-sky - Beneath a Steel Sky - Adventure Game Alias: scummvm-bass https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214057 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2006-11-09 13:13 EST ------- All MUST and SHOULD items fixed. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 9 18:23:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2006 13:23:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213832] Review Request: arpwatch - Network monitoring tools for tracking IP addresses on a network In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611091823.kA9INrHu000855@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: arpwatch - Network monitoring tools for tracking IP addresses on a network https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213832 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-11-09 13:23 EST ------- In general it is not needed, but I think it could be helpfull in the case of the one liners of that package to have both versions of the script to be able to do a gendiff to see what the one-liners did. It would amount to changing the perl line to look like: perl -pi.quotes -e "s/\'/\'\\\'\'/g" *.awk and doing a cp after the sed one liner, something along: .... > $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_sbindir}/$i.embedawk cp $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_sbindir}/$i.embedawk . mv $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_sbindir}/$i{.embedawk,} .... After seing the result of the perl one-liner result, I really think it should be a patch... For the awk embedding it is certainly better with the one-liner, but with a way to be able to easily see what was changed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 9 18:24:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2006 13:24:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 209259] Review Request: beryl-core - Beryl OpenGL window and compositing manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611091824.kA9IO9DU000887@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: beryl-core - Beryl OpenGL window and compositing manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209259 ------- Additional Comments From martin.sourada at seznam.cz 2006-11-09 13:24 EST ------- Thanks for your effort, man. Do you have any idea when it will be finally pushed to extras? It seems that version 0.1.2 was released recently, I hope you will update your packages :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 9 18:25:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2006 13:25:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214730] Review Request: pungi - Distribution compose tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611091825.kA9IPnEP001189@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pungi - Distribution compose tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214730 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-11-09 13:25 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > A wrapper doesn't quite make sense, since these are python modules. If you > wanted just the functionality of gather, you'd probably use yumdownloader or > repotrack instead, or you'd import the pypungi.gather module into your python > script and use it there. For pypungi.pungi, there is a bit more of a chance of > wanting to run it standalone, but since it is a module, you can do that (: Right. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 9 18:49:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2006 13:49:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 209259] Review Request: beryl-core - Beryl OpenGL window and compositing manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611091849.kA9InQHv003449@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: beryl-core - Beryl OpenGL window and compositing manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209259 ------- Additional Comments From jwilson at redhat.com 2006-11-09 13:49 EST ------- (In reply to comment #19) > Thanks for your effort, man. Do you have any idea when it will be finally pushed > to extras? As soon as someone steps up to actually do all the necessary package reviews. :) > It seems that version 0.1.2 was released recently, I hope you will > update your packages :-) Already working on it... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 9 18:59:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2006 13:59:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213832] Review Request: arpwatch - Network monitoring tools for tracking IP addresses on a network In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611091859.kA9IxKOD004442@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: arpwatch - Network monitoring tools for tracking IP addresses on a network https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213832 tmraz at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|188267 |188268 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tmraz at redhat.com 2006-11-09 13:59 EST ------- Miroslav, whether you will implement the comment #9 I'd leave on your decision. Other nits: As you require /usr/sbin/sendmail you should probably also BuildRequire it because otherwise the /usr/lib/sendmail default from the configure script will be used. The snmpwalk non-requirement looks to me like a non issue because user running the arpfetch command will get a message snmpwalk not found if it is not there. And I wouldn't say that the script is non functional, it just requires installation of another package. This is really only issue of aesthetics and I'd like to leave that on Miroslav to decide. The release number should be probably just a single number (+ disttag) for FC devel. The scripts aren't one-to-one copy of the scriptlets from guidelines but I don't think it is mandatory to have one-to-one copy if they work the same. As the things above are only minor nits and comments and the package is OK otherwise I think I can call it ACCEPTED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 9 19:21:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2006 14:21:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213832] Review Request: arpwatch - Network monitoring tools for tracking IP addresses on a network In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611091921.kA9JL39b006401@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: arpwatch - Network monitoring tools for tracking IP addresses on a network https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213832 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-11-09 14:20 EST ------- (In reply to comment #10) > The snmpwalk non-requirement looks to me like a non issue because user running > the arpfetch command will get a message snmpwalk not found if it is not there. That's what I call broken. A user running a script installed in the default PATH by a package should not get any error. Or it should be documented prominently. > And I wouldn't say that the script is non functional, it just requires > installation of another package. This is really only issue of aesthetics and I'd > like to leave that on Miroslav to decide. It's not aesthetic, it's poor packaging. Packaged software should work out of the box, or have things that won't work out of the box documented. > The release number should be probably just a single number (+ disttag) for FC devel. If it is a pre-release it should be named according to http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#head-d97a3f40b6dd9d2288206ac9bd8f1bf9b791b22a If it is a post release version, it is right as is, as seen here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#head-18aa467fc6925455e44be682fd336667a17e8933 > The scripts aren't one-to-one copy of the scriptlets from guidelines but I don't > think it is mandatory to have one-to-one copy if they work the same. I agree on the principle, but I'd like to have some explanations. Is it true that they work the same? Is it sure that the exit 0 is enough to avoid any failure? Some snippets on the wiki page have ||:, is it unusefull? > As the things above are only minor nits and comments and the package is OK > otherwise I think I can call it ACCEPTED. One of my questions hasn't been answered. It is certainly not a blocker, but I think it also deserves an explanation (it may even be that it is the other possibility, ie doing useradd only for the first install which is wrong): * why isn't the useradd only done for the first install? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 9 19:21:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2006 14:21:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214751] Review Request: xview - XView widget libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611091921.kA9JLBj9006426@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xview - XView widget libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214751 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-11-09 14:21 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=140809) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=140809&action=view) Patch with some interesting fixes from Suse I've spend some hours taking a look and I've come to the same conclusion as the Debian maintainer, this is very hard to fix for 64 bit. More then that fixing probably will also include fixing / changing all xview using clients! Luckily all 64 bit platforms we support also have a 32 bit compatibility option, so I think we should just not build xview (and apps using it) for x86_64 / ppc64. It would be a good idea IMHO in cases like this to add xview + deps + packages using it to a list of packages to copy over to the x86_64 repo from the i386 repo, so that it will be readily available for those who want it. My taking a look started with suse since they had x86_64 packages of xview in their repo, but appearantly these have had the famous suse QA done do them (iow none). I did find some other interesting patches in there, which I have bundled in a smaller one with possible real fixes and a larger one which fixes a load of warnings (but no where near all warnings). I also have a patch which fixes some 64 bit related warnings by adding the necessary prototypes, which isn't enough to get this running but IMHO still should be applied / send upstream (Debian claims to be upstream these days) as it is an improvement. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 9 19:22:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2006 14:22:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214751] Review Request: xview - XView widget libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611091922.kA9JM3X6006587@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xview - XView widget libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214751 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-11-09 14:22 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=140810) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=140810&action=view) Patch fixing a bunch of warnings -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 9 19:23:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2006 14:23:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214751] Review Request: xview - XView widget libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611091923.kA9JN6fG006738@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xview - XView widget libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214751 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-11-09 14:23 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=140811) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=140811&action=view) Patch: add some missing prototypes fixing a few 64 bit related warnings (but 64 bit is still nogo) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 9 19:33:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2006 14:33:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 200666] Review Request: theora-exp - Experimental theora decoder In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611091933.kA9JXq93007669@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: theora-exp - Experimental theora decoder https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200666 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #139996|0 |1 is obsolete| | ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-11-09 14:33 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=140813) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=140813&action=view) Updated specfile (In reply to comment #9) > * the "-devel" package owns "/usr/include/theora" directory, which is questionable. > It seems that libtheora-devel should own this, but currently this dir is not > owned at all. Anyway, IMO, an Extras package should not own anything already > present in the Core... > Since theora-exp-devel and theora-exp themselves can be installed without having libtheora(-devel) installed, I believe that theora-exp-devel is correct in owning this dir, otherwise it would be unowned when libtheora(-devel) isn't installed. The fact that libtheora-devel doesn't own it is a bug. Will you file this, or shall I? > * "-devel" package must "Requires: pkgconfig" as it has .pc file > You're correct there. > * Suggestion: add some words to %description that "theora" is related to "video > codec" etc. It could help newbies a little... :) Good idea! I've attached a new specfile, as for some reason I cannot access people.atrpms.net ATM. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 9 19:34:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2006 14:34:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214057] Review Request: beneath-a-steel-sky - Beneath a Steel Sky - Adventure Game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611091934.kA9JYV5O007767@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: beneath-a-steel-sky - Beneath a Steel Sky - Adventure Game Alias: scummvm-bass https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214057 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-11-09 14:34 EST ------- Thanks! Imported and Build, closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 9 19:48:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2006 14:48:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213832] Review Request: arpwatch - Network monitoring tools for tracking IP addresses on a network In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611091948.kA9JmrHA009506@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: arpwatch - Network monitoring tools for tracking IP addresses on a network https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213832 ------- Additional Comments From tmraz at redhat.com 2006-11-09 14:48 EST ------- (In reply to comment #11) > > The snmpwalk non-requirement looks to me like a non issue because user running > > the arpfetch command will get a message snmpwalk not found if it is not there. > > That's what I call broken. A user running a script installed in the default > PATH by a package should not get any error. Or it should be documented > prominently. > > > And I wouldn't say that the script is non functional, it just requires > > installation of another package. This is really only issue of aesthetics and I'd > > like to leave that on Miroslav to decide. > > It's not aesthetic, it's poor packaging. Packaged software should work > out of the box, or have things that won't work out of the box > documented. OK, if README.fedora in %doc would satisfy you I think that Miroslav should add it. Or arpfetch could be moved to %doc. > > The release number should be probably just a single number (+ disttag) for FC > devel. > > If it is a pre-release it should be named according to > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#head-d97a3f40b6dd9d2288206ac9bd8f1bf9b791b22a > > If it is a post release version, it is right as is, as seen here: > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#head-18aa467fc6925455e44be682fd336667a17e8933 It is post release, I didn't comment on the version but on the release number (1.1) - two part number shouldn't be used in devel without a reason. > > The scripts aren't one-to-one copy of the scriptlets from guidelines but I don't > > think it is mandatory to have one-to-one copy if they work the same. > > I agree on the principle, but I'd like to have some explanations. > Is it true that they work the same? Is it sure that the exit 0 is enough > to avoid any failure? Some snippets on the wiki page have ||:, is it > unusefull? I've actually tested the scriptlets and even if /sbin/service return nonzero exit code the chkconfig runs OK so the || : is unnecessary. > > As the things above are only minor nits and comments and the package is OK > > otherwise I think I can call it ACCEPTED. > > One of my questions hasn't been answered. It is certainly not a blocker, > but I think it also deserves an explanation (it may even be that it is > the other possibility, ie doing useradd only for the first install which > is wrong): > > * why isn't the useradd only done for the first install? > I'll leave this one on Miroslav to answer. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 9 20:01:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2006 15:01:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 200600] Review Request: phpPgAdmin - web based PostgreSQL administration In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611092001.kA9K1DFa011924@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: phpPgAdmin - web based PostgreSQL administration https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200600 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2006-11-09 15:01 EST ------- As a non-sponsored would-be contributor, I'd like to contribute the following: A: I've downloaded the most recent srpm and spec and run over the MUST and SHOULD lists from ReviewGuidelines, and it checks out AFAICT. Also, as a longtime user of this app on Fedora installing from tarballs, I can say that it works as expected. B: Is there a reason to Require either webserver OR httpd? Does not php require httpd which would then satisfy webserver? Obviously I can't complete the formal review, just thought I'd put in my $0.02 US. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 9 20:14:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2006 15:14:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214872] New: Review Request: Ri-li - Arcade game where you drive a toy wood engine Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214872 Summary: Review Request: Ri-li - Arcade game where you drive a toy wood engine Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/Ri-li.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/Ri-li-2.0.0-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: You drive a toy wood engine in many levels and you must collect all the coaches to win. Full-featured: 18 languages, Colorful animated wood engine, 50 levels, 3 beautiful music tracks and many sound effects. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 9 20:49:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2006 15:49:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213832] Review Request: arpwatch - Network monitoring tools for tracking IP addresses on a network In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611092049.kA9KnNWZ020650@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: arpwatch - Network monitoring tools for tracking IP addresses on a network https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213832 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-11-09 15:49 EST ------- (In reply to comment #12) > OK, if README.fedora in %doc would satisfy you I think that Miroslav should add > it. Or arpfetch could be moved to %doc. Both solutions seem right to me. I have a slight personal preference for arpfetch in %doc. > It is post release, I didn't comment on the version but on the release number > (1.1) - two part number shouldn't be used in devel without a reason. Ok, you're right, I misunderstood... > I've actually tested the scriptlets and even if /sbin/service return nonzero > exit code the chkconfig runs OK so the || : is unnecessary. Ok. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 9 20:54:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2006 15:54:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 200600] Review Request: phpPgAdmin - web based PostgreSQL administration In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611092054.kA9KsRRg021628@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: phpPgAdmin - web based PostgreSQL administration https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200600 limb at jcomserv.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |limb at jcomserv.net ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2006-11-09 15:54 EST ------- Incidentally, as I am new to this process, if I have overlooked anything, I'd be very keen on knowing what. (In reply to comment #10) > As a non-sponsored would-be contributor, I'd like to contribute the following: > > A: I've downloaded the most recent srpm and spec and run over the MUST and > SHOULD lists from ReviewGuidelines, and it checks out AFAICT. Also, as a > longtime user of this app on Fedora installing from tarballs, I can say that it > works as expected. > > B: Is there a reason to Require either webserver OR httpd? Does not php require > httpd which would then satisfy webserver? > > Obviously I can't complete the formal review, just thought I'd put in my $0.02 US. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 9 21:30:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2006 16:30:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214893] New: Review Request: sipp - SIP test tool / traffic generator Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214893 Summary: Review Request: sipp - SIP test tool / traffic generator Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lemenkov at gmail.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://lemenkov.newmail.ru/SPECS/sipp.spec SRPM URL: http://lemenkov.newmail.ru/SRPMS/sipp-1.0-0.src.rpm Description: SIPp is a free Open Source test tool / traffic generator for the SIP protocol. It includes a few basic SipStone user agent scenarios (UAC and UAS) and establishes and releases multiple calls with the INVITE and BYE methods. It can also reads custom XML scenario files describing from very simple to complex call flows. It features the dynamic display of statistics about running tests (call rate, round trip delay, and message statistics), periodic CSV statistics dumps, TCP and UDP over multiple sockets or multiplexed with retransmission management and dynamically adjustable call rates. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 9 22:58:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2006 17:58:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214091] Review Request: beneath-a-steel-sky-cd - Beneath a Steel Sky - Adventure Game - CD version In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611092258.kA9MwUcd032329@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: beneath-a-steel-sky-cd - Beneath a Steel Sky - Adventure Game - CD version Alias: scummvm-bass-CD https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214091 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2006-11-09 17:58 EST ------- ==== REVIEW CHECKLIST ==== - rpmlint output W: beneath-a-steel-sky-cd no-%build-section okay, but no harm in enabling %build either - spec file named according to package naming guidelines (but a provides bass-cd would make it easier to install) - spec filename matches %{name} - package meets packaging guidelines - licensed as distributable, see https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-extras-list/2006-November/msg00030.html - License file included in %doc - spec written in American english - spec file is legible - sources match upstream 1d4401cd663715332abe8bb5431e356d bass-cd-1.2.zip - package successfully compiles and builds on FC5 X86_64 - all dependencies listed in BR - no locales - no shared libraries - package is not relocatable - package owns all directories it creates - no duplicates in %files - file permissions set properly - package has proper %clean section - macro usage is consistent - package contains permissible content - no large documentation - no header files or static libraries - no pkgconfig files - no devel subpackage required - no .la files - package contains proper .desktop file - package does not own files or directories owned by other packages APPROVED ==== SHOULD ==== - uncomment %build to make rpmlint happy - add Provides: bass-cd for easier commandline installs - add comment above license pointing to distribution discussions on f-e-l -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 9 23:12:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2006 18:12:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214113] Review Request: flight-of-the-amazon-queen - Flight of the Amazon Queen - Adventure Game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611092312.kA9NC3sI000871@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: flight-of-the-amazon-queen - Flight of the Amazon Queen - Adventure Game Alias: scummvm-amazon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214113 ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2006-11-09 18:11 EST ------- Ah okay, I think I must have had some old setting left over from an older install. I removed my ~/.scummvmrc file and this fixed the problem. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 9 23:23:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2006 18:23:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214124] Review Request: bogl - a graphics library and an Unicode terminal emulator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611092323.kA9NNDQq001465@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bogl - a graphics library and an Unicode terminal emulator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214124 ------- Additional Comments From mitr at redhat.com 2006-11-09 18:23 EST ------- Thanks for the comments! (In reply to comment #1) > * rpmlint is not silent. [SNIP] > I can see from the comment in the specthat there really aren't any URL > presently, but I think that one should be provided/created. packages.debian.org URL added. > * There is no use of the %find_lang macro in the spec. There are no locale files > so maybe this is not needed anyway? Exactly. > * /usr/share/bogl is not owned by any package (use %dir) AFAICS this directory is owned by bogl-bterm. > * /usr/include/bogl is not owned by any package (use %dir) ... and this one by bogl-devel. > * You are using: "Requires: bogl = %{epoch}:%{version}-%{release}". > Why not: "Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release}" ? Se also my comment > about the epoch tag below. Because the package does have Epoch: 0. Even if 0 behaves exactly the same as "not present" (which I'm not sure is true), it seems better not to rely on this. > From http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines: > * Timestamps: Consider using "install -p" and "cp -p". You could use > INSTALL="install -c -p" in your make install command Changed for the header files, the other files are created during the build. > Other issues: > * I can't see any resaon why you need to use the epoch tag. Version numbers like > 0.1.18 are not hard for RPM to parse at all. See e.g. here: > http://www.rpm.org/max-rpm-snapshot/s1-rpm-inside-tags.html#S3-RPM-INSIDE-REQUIRES-TAG The epoch is already in the old Fedora / RHEL packages, and http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Tools/RPM/VersionComparison seems to say removing the epoch could break upgrades. > * There is no COPYING file in the top-level source directory. There should be. Too bad. I have added the debian/copyright files, although I don't think they can really replace the licence. > * The *.bdf files are not under the GPL, but they appear to be free enough > * bogl does not use autoconf/automake. I really do find that the old Makefile > way is to inflexible. This should be fixed upstream, not in Fedora packaging. > * Please use "Release: 12%{?dist}" not "Release: 12" AFAIK the dist tag is not mandatory, and I'd rather not use it for the main branch if possible. > * There is a lot of compile warnings. These warning should be reviewd for > seriousness. I know this is just me being overly strict, but I would prefer the > Werror compile flag to be mandatory for all F[C,E] packages. I have reviewed them about a year ago, and IIRC all the remaining warnings are harmless. > - I recommend using %_datadir instead of /usr/share. Both /usr/share/terminfo and /usr/share/bogl are hardcoded in the bogl installation scripts and the source, respectively, so the spec file should use /usr/share as well. > - fedora specific compilation flags are not passed. Fixed. > - Well, Japanese people (including me) always complain about bterm > as this software (bterm) is not useful for non-root users because > *it seems* bterm requires device access right to /dev/tty0 . > (I have not checked the whole source code of bterm and perhaps it is > impossible for me). It fails on opening /dev/tty0, but even if that were removed, bogl needs root privileges anyway to drive the VGA hardware. I have looked at the kernel code a bit and I couldn't find any alternative, although I'm not very familiar with the framebuffer API. I'd prefer leaving the program as is, I don't think it was audited for running by hostile users. http://people.redhat.com/mitr/extras/bogl-0.1.18-13.src.rpm : * Fri Nov 10 2006 Miloslav Trmac - 0:0.1.18-13 - Add URL: - Preserve modification date of header files - Ship debian/copyright - Compile all files with $RPM_OPT_FLAGS -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 9 23:26:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2006 18:26:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214113] Review Request: flight-of-the-amazon-queen - Flight of the Amazon Queen - Adventure Game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611092326.kA9NQbqx001739@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: flight-of-the-amazon-queen - Flight of the Amazon Queen - Adventure Game Alias: scummvm-amazon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214113 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2006-11-09 18:26 EST ------- ==== REVIEW CHECKLIST ==== - rpmlint output W: flight-of-the-amazon-queen no-%build-section okay, but no harm in enabling %build either - spec file named according to package naming guidelines - spec filename matches %{name} - package meets packaging guidelines - licensed as distributable, see https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-extras-list/2006-November/msg00030.html - License file included in %doc - spec written in American english - spec file is legible - sources match upstream eafb6bc4edc6255b871477cfc54312de FOTAQ_Floppy.zip - package successfully compiles and builds on FC5 X86_64 - all dependencies listed in BR - no locales - no shared libraries - package is not relocatable - package owns all directories it creates - no duplicates in %files - file permissions set properly - package has proper %clean section - macro usage is consistent - package contains permissible content - no large documentation - no header files or static libraries - no pkgconfig files - no devel subpackage required - no .la files - package contains proper .desktop file - package does not own files or directories owned by other packages APPROVED ==== SHOULD ==== - uncomment %build to make rpmlint happy - add Provides: fotaq for easier commandline installs - add comment above license pointing to distribution discussions on f-e-l -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 9 23:50:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2006 18:50:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214150] Review Request: flight-of-the-amazon-queen-cd - Flight of the Amazon Queen - Adventure Game - CD version In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611092350.kA9NoPtT002831@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: flight-of-the-amazon-queen-cd - Flight of the Amazon Queen - Adventure Game - CD version Alias: scumm-amazon-CD https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214150 ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2006-11-09 18:50 EST ------- ==== REVIEW CHECKLIST ==== - rpmlint output W: flight-of-the-amazon-queen-cd no-%build-section okay, but no harm in enabling %build either - spec file named according to package naming guidelines - spec filename matches %{name} - package meets packaging guidelines - licensed as distributable, see https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-extras-list/2006-November/msg00030.html - License file included in %doc - spec written in American english - spec file is legible X sources match upstream SOURCES ARE TAKING A LONG TIME TO DOWNLOAD - package successfully compiles and builds on FC5 X86_64 - all dependencies listed in BR - no locales - no shared libraries - package is not relocatable - package owns all directories it creates - no duplicates in %files - file permissions set properly - package has proper %clean section - macro usage is consistent - package contains permissible content - no large documentation - no header files or static libraries - no pkgconfig files - no devel subpackage required - no .la files - package contains proper .desktop file - package does not own files or directories owned by other packages APPROVED (PENDING MD5SUM CHECK ON SOURCES WHEN DOWNLOAD COMPLETE) ==== MUST ==== - wait for me to finsih downloading source from upstream, ftp is *really* slow. Will commit what I have of the review now, and do an md5sum check when the download is complete. Once that is done I will set this as blocking FE-ACCEPT ==== SHOULD ==== - uncomment %build to make rpmlint happy - add Provides: fotaq-cd for easier commandline installs - add comment above license pointing to distribution discussions on f-e-l - remove README.SUSE from %doc I dont see anything useful there for Fedora installs. If you want to keep the part about how it was generated this can be put in a README.FEDORA file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 9 23:59:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2006 18:59:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213594] Review Request: eclipse-phpeclipse In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611092359.kA9Nx5Ix003136@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-phpeclipse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213594 ------- Additional Comments From green at redhat.com 2006-11-09 18:59 EST ------- (In reply to comment #6) > Spec URL: http://theholbrooks.org/RPMS/eclipse-phpeclipse.spec > SRPM URL: http://theholbrooks.org/RPMS/eclipse-phpeclipse-1.1.8-9.src.rpm This fails to build in mock for me. I don't know why. I'll attach the build log. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 10 00:00:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2006 19:00:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213594] Review Request: eclipse-phpeclipse In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611100000.kAA00V7v003257@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-phpeclipse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213594 ------- Additional Comments From green at redhat.com 2006-11-09 19:00 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=140853) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=140853&action=view) Build log from mock -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 10 00:04:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2006 19:04:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214150] Review Request: flight-of-the-amazon-queen-cd - Flight of the Amazon Queen - Adventure Game - CD version In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611100004.kAA04HbC003421@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: flight-of-the-amazon-queen-cd - Flight of the Amazon Queen - Adventure Game - CD version Alias: scumm-amazon-CD https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214150 ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2006-11-09 19:04 EST ------- Instead of README.FEDORA as I suggested above, I think it would be better to simply add a comment above the Source0 tag explaining how the file was generated from the originals (queenrebuild --ogg -Q -b 16 queen.1) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 10 00:14:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2006 19:14:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 212923] Review Request: php-pear-XML-RSS - RSS parser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611100014.kAA0E0qv003657@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-XML-RSS - RSS parser Alias: pear-XML-RSS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212923 ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2006-11-09 19:13 EST ------- Heya Remi, this bug is still set with a status of NEW and blocking FE-REVIEW, I was wondering if you had meant to approve this? Thanks for the review :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 10 00:54:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2006 19:54:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213594] Review Request: eclipse-phpeclipse In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611100054.kAA0sQM2004659@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-phpeclipse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213594 ------- Additional Comments From bkonrath at redhat.com 2006-11-09 19:54 EST ------- That build error is happening because the eclipse SDK packages have changed a little since the review was submitted. You need to build with either: eclipse -noSplash \ -application org.eclipse.ant.core.antRunner \ -DjavacFailOnError=true \ ... or: java -cp $SDK/startup.jar \ -Dosgi.sharedConfiguration.area=%{_libdir}/eclipse/configuration \ -Duser.home=$homedir \ org.eclipse.core.launcher.Main \ -DjavacFailOnError=true \ ... I like the first build method better because it will automatically pick up anything we add to the binary launcher to help discover things like new eclipseextension locations, config locations etc. But I've been having some problems with GCJ using that build method - GCJ seems to use up all the memory on my system and then build gets an OutOfMemory exception and die. So if the first build method doesn't work, then try the second. I hope this helps and don't be afraid to ask if you have any questions. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 10 01:04:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2006 20:04:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 202528] Review Request: rt2x00-kmod In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611100104.kAA14n6k005163@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rt2x00-kmod https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202528 ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2006-11-09 20:04 EST ------- Compilation works with the testing kernel-2.6.18-1.2835.fc6 (same url) d80211(-kmod-common) SRPMS URL: http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/SOURCES/d80211-0.0.0cvs20061110-1.kwizart.fc6.src.rpm SPEC URL http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/SOURCES/d80211.spec d80211-kmod SRPMS URL: http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/SOURCES/d80211-kmod-0.0.0cvs20061110-1.2.6.18_1.2835.kwizart.fc6.src.rpm SPEC URL: http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/SOURCES/d80211-kmod.spec I will work on the linville issue, when i will have more time... Any answears, felling or thoughts to the question i ask? Thx Nicolas -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 10 01:14:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2006 20:14:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214227] Review Request: vala - A modern programming language for GNOME In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611100114.kAA1ERsW005728@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vala - A modern programming language for GNOME https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214227 michel.salim at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 10 04:31:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2006 23:31:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214457] Review Request: php-pear-Cache - Framework for caching of arbitrary data In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611100431.kAA4VSHi015573@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Cache - Framework for caching of arbitrary data Alias: php-pear-Cache https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214457 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2006-11-09 23:31 EST ------- ==== REVIEW CHECKLIST ==== - rpmlint output clean - package named according to package naming guidelines - package licensed with open source compatible license - license matches actual license - licnese included in %doc - spec file written in American english - spec file legible - sources match upstream d7ababc47030b1d69aba655156a41ea3 ../SOURCES/Cache-1.5.5RC4.tgz - package successfully compiles and builds on FC5 x86_64 - all build dependencies listed in BR - no locales - no shared libraries - not relocatable - package owns all directories it creates - no duplicates in %files - file permissions set properly - contains proper %clean section - macro usage is consistent - contains code - no large documentation - files in %doc do not affect runtime - no header files or static libraries - no pkgconfig files - no devel subpackage required - no .la files - not a GUI app needing a .desktop file - packages does not own files or directories owned by other packages APPROVED ==== SHOULD ==== - Change fullversion to just "beta" and define it to "RC4", then set: Release: 0.1.%{beta}%{?dist} Source0 ...%{pear_name}-%{version}{%beta}.tgz etc.. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 10 04:42:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2006 23:42:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 212923] Review Request: php-pear-XML-RSS - RSS parser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611100442.kAA4gftr016477@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-XML-RSS - RSS parser Alias: pear-XML-RSS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212923 ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2006-11-09 23:42 EST ------- SPEC: http://tkmame.retrogames.com/fedora-extras/php-pear-XML-RSS.spec SRPM: http://tkmame.retrogames.com/fedora-extras/php-pear-XML-RSS-0.9.10-2.src.rpm %changelog * Thu Nov 09 2006 Christopher Stone 0.9.10-2 - Added license file to %%doc - Added versioned requires -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 10 04:49:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2006 23:49:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214150] Review Request: flight-of-the-amazon-queen-cd - Flight of the Amazon Queen - Adventure Game - CD version In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611100449.kAA4nal0016882@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: flight-of-the-amazon-queen-cd - Flight of the Amazon Queen - Adventure Game - CD version Alias: scumm-amazon-CD https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214150 ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2006-11-09 23:49 EST ------- Hans, I am having difficulty downloading the file from the suse server. I think perhaps it would be easier to download the original from sourceforge, then convert it using queenrebuild tool, then do a md5sum on that. I assume queenrebuild comes with scummvm-tools? The version of scummvm-tools I have does not have this command. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 10 04:56:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2006 23:56:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214151] Review Request: flight-of-the-amazon-queen-cd - Flight of the Amazon Queen - Adventure Game - CD version In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611100456.kAA4uIOS017147@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: flight-of-the-amazon-queen-cd - Flight of the Amazon Queen - Adventure Game - CD version https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214151 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 10 06:00:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2006 01:00:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214124] Review Request: bogl - a graphics library and an Unicode terminal emulator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611100600.kAA60fDY018713@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bogl - a graphics library and an Unicode terminal emulator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214124 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-11-10 01:00 EST ------- Well, I have not yet checked your new srpm, however: (In reply to comment #4) > Thanks for the comments! > > * Please use "Release: 12%{?dist}" not "Release: 12" > AFAIK the dist tag is not mandatory, and I'd rather not use it for the main > branch if possible. For using FE CVS system, this seems mandatory as we have to make a DIFFERENT tag for different branch. Without %?dist tag, you have to change release number manually for each branch (-devel, 6, 5) even there is no difference for srpm, which seems annoying for me Note that you have to rebuild this against -devel branch first, so you have to 'decrease' release number. (however if you have a different idea, this is not a blocker). Anyway I will check for the other things later. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 10 06:05:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2006 01:05:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 212923] Review Request: php-pear-XML-RSS - RSS parser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611100605.kAA65dRw018873@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-XML-RSS - RSS parser Alias: pear-XML-RSS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212923 ------- Additional Comments From Fedora at FamilleCollet.com 2006-11-10 01:05 EST ------- the 2 "should" in comment #1 are not a blocker and are ok now. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 10 06:05:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2006 01:05:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 212923] Review Request: php-pear-XML-RSS - RSS parser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611100605.kAA65vbH018911@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-XML-RSS - RSS parser Alias: pear-XML-RSS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212923 Fedora at FamilleCollet.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 10 07:03:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2006 02:03:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214025] Review Request: Tracker - An object database, tag/metadata database, search tool and indexer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611100703.kAA73TSV021058@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Tracker - An object database, tag/metadata database, search tool and indexer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214025 dakingun at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 10 07:29:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2006 02:29:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 207793] Review Request: flite - Small, fast speech synthesis engine (text-to-speech) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611100729.kAA7TjON021900@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: flite - Small, fast speech synthesis engine (text-to-speech) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207793 ------- Additional Comments From faucamp at csir.co.za 2006-11-10 02:29 EST ------- I have started re-writing the shared libraries patch to fix the "undefined symbol"-issues, and to make the flite binary link to its own shared libraries (thanks for pointing this out). The idea here is to make the patch as clear as possible (unlike the current sharedlibs patch), for easier maintainability. IMHO, the shared libraries and -devel packages are very valuable, as flite actually has quite a nice API for embedding text-to-speech in other applications. :-) Will probably publish a new build later today. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 10 08:48:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2006 03:48:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214091] Review Request: beneath-a-steel-sky-cd - Beneath a Steel Sky - Adventure Game - CD version In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611100848.kAA8m0rb025339@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: beneath-a-steel-sky-cd - Beneath a Steel Sky - Adventure Game - CD version Alias: scummvm-bass-CD https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214091 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-11-10 03:47 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > ==== SHOULD ==== > - uncomment %build to make rpmlint happy Done > - add Provides: bass-cd for easier commandline installs Not done, I deliberately choose the long name as bass is a much to generic name, giving no information about the package contents and leading to potential namespace conflicts. > - add comment above license pointing to distribution discussions on f-e-l Done. Imported and build. Thanks for the review! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 10 09:05:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2006 04:05:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214113] Review Request: flight-of-the-amazon-queen - Flight of the Amazon Queen - Adventure Game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611100905.kAA95JYO027421@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: flight-of-the-amazon-queen - Flight of the Amazon Queen - Adventure Game Alias: scummvm-amazon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214113 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-11-10 04:05 EST ------- (In reply to comment #6) > ==== SHOULD ==== > - uncomment %build to make rpmlint happy Done > - add Provides: fotaq for easier commandline installs Not done, I deliberately choose the long name as fotaq is a much cryptic giving no information about the package contents. > - add comment above license pointing to distribution discussions on f-e-l Done Imported and Build, Thanks for the review! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 10 09:28:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2006 04:28:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214124] Review Request: bogl - a graphics library and an Unicode terminal emulator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611100928.kAA9SOeE029461@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bogl - a graphics library and an Unicode terminal emulator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214124 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-11-10 04:28 EST ------- I checked again and everything is okay. I recommend adding ?dist tag, however, http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/DistTag says it is not mandatory. -------------------------------------------------------------- This package (bogl) is ACCEPTED by me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 10 09:30:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2006 04:30:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 203520] Review Request: evolution-brutus In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611100930.kAA9UgWj029648@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: evolution-brutus Alias: evolution-brutus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203520 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-11-10 04:30 EST ------- Okay, now I trust you and I will sponsor you. ------------------------------------------------------- Please go forward according to http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/Contributors to import this package to Fedora Extras. I will sponsor you when you have taken steps partway written in the page above (then I should receive the mail that you need a sponsor). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 10 09:32:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2006 04:32:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 203520] Review Request: evolution-brutus In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611100932.kAA9WO3k029825@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: evolution-brutus Alias: evolution-brutus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203520 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-11-10 04:32 EST ------- Oh, I forgot to write this...... ------------------------------------------------------ This package (evolution-brutus) is ACCEPTED by me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 10 09:45:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2006 04:45:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214124] Review Request: bogl - a graphics library and an Unicode terminal emulator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611100945.kAA9j0Ja030553@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bogl - a graphics library and an Unicode terminal emulator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214124 ------- Additional Comments From colding at omesc.com 2006-11-10 04:44 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > > Jules, any comments? Sure. I'll jump straight to your comments to my comments. This is, after all, a learning experience for me. > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > In my opinion, the following are okay. > > = /usr/share/bogl > This is correctly owned by bogl-bterm > > = /usr/include/bogl > This is correctly owned by bogl-bterm Hmm.. I was under the false impression that the right way to claim directory ownership was to state the directory with the %dir macro first and later list all files within that directory. > = You are using: "Requires: bogl = %{epoch}:%{version}-%{release}" > This is correct when using epoch. > > = I can't see any resaon why you need to use the epoch tag > For this package, epoch is needed as Epoch was already used > when this package was in Fedora Core. OK, but epoch is generally frowned upon, right? > = source files license issue: > Well, surely some of the source files are not explicitly > licensed, however, for now I trust that these are licensed > under GPL accroding to debian/copyright. OK, but was I correct in bringing the "issue" to light? I remember reading somewhere on gnu.org that each and every file should explicitly state the license terms as well as a copyright notice. > = bogl does not use autoconf/automake > In my opinion, autoconf/automake should not be used unless > it is unavoidable and there is no problem for this package. OK. It is just me beeing overly pedantic here... > = There is a lot of compile warnings > Well, compilation warnings should be avoided as well as > possible, however my opinion is this is not a blocker > as long as the warnings are not _crucial_ . > I maintain xscreensaver, of which the compilation warning canNOT > be avoided because of gtk2 "bug". No, surely not a blocker. Miloslav also states above that he did review all of those warning about a year ago, so they should be harmles. Now of to pre-review some other unfortunate package :-) -- jules -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 10 09:52:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2006 04:52:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 203520] Review Request: evolution-brutus In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611100952.kAA9qFLa031013@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: evolution-brutus Alias: evolution-brutus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203520 ------- Additional Comments From colding at omesc.com 2006-11-10 04:52 EST ------- What a great way to begin the day ;-) I'll jump straight to those additional steps. Thanks a lot! jules -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 10 09:54:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2006 04:54:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214124] Review Request: bogl - a graphics library and an Unicode terminal emulator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611100954.kAA9sCKm031165@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bogl - a graphics library and an Unicode terminal emulator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214124 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-11-10 04:54 EST ------- (In reply to comment #7) > > = /usr/share/bogl > > = /usr/include/bogl > > This is correctly owned by bogl-bterm > Hmm.. I was under the false impression that the right way to claim directory > ownership was to state the directory with the %dir macro first and later list > all files within that directory. Your way is polite and recommended, however, not a few people (including Miloslav and me) just write the directory name, which means the directory itself and all the files under the directory. > > = You are using: "Requires: bogl = %{epoch}:%{version}-%{release}" > > This is correct when using epoch. > > > > = I can't see any resaon why you need to use the epoch tag > > For this package, epoch is needed as Epoch was already used > > when this package was in Fedora Core. > > OK, but epoch is generally frowned upon, right? Yes, generally epoch should be avoided, however, *ONCE* it is used it becomes inevitable...... > > = source files license issue: > > Well, surely some of the source files are not explicitly > > licensed, however, for now I trust that these are licensed > > under GPL accroding to debian/copyright. > > OK, but was I correct in bringing the "issue" to light? I remember reading > somewhere on gnu.org that each and every file should explicitly state the > license terms as well as a copyright notice. I think this should be left to the discussion with upstream. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 10 10:04:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2006 05:04:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214150] Review Request: flight-of-the-amazon-queen-cd - Flight of the Amazon Queen - Adventure Game - CD version In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611101004.kAAA4rpi031760@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: flight-of-the-amazon-queen-cd - Flight of the Amazon Queen - Adventure Game - CD version Alias: scumm-amazon-CD https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214150 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-11-10 05:04 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > Instead of README.FEDORA as I suggested above, I think it would be better to > simply add a comment above the Source0 tag explaining how the file was generated > from the originals (queenrebuild --ogg -Q -b 16 queen.1) > Good idea, will do! (In reply to comment #4) > Hans, I am having difficulty downloading the file from the suse server. I think > perhaps it would be easier to download the original from sourceforge, then > convert it using queenrebuild tool, then do a md5sum on that. I assume > queenrebuild comes with scummvm-tools? The version of scummvm-tools I have does > not have this command. Hmm, it downloaded fine for me and I'dd rather not download / upload 100 Mb or so again just so that an md5sum can be checked. The bzip2 checksum is ok, so I assume my download is not corrupted. Can't you believe me on my blue (brown actually) eyes that that file came from that URL and was not tempered with? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 10 10:09:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2006 05:09:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213600] Review Request: tinyca2 - Simple graphical userinterface to manage a small CA In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611101009.kAAA9fr5031974@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tinyca2 - Simple graphical userinterface to manage a small CA https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213600 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 10 10:11:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2006 05:11:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213600] Review Request: tinyca2 - Simple graphical userinterface to manage a small CA In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611101011.kAAAB4CM032108@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tinyca2 - Simple graphical userinterface to manage a small CA https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213600 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-11-10 05:11 EST ------- I will review this later. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 10 10:28:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2006 05:28:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 212704] Review Request: manedit - UNIX Manual Page Editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611101028.kAAASBUw000425@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: manedit - UNIX Manual Page Editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212704 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-11-10 05:28 EST ------- Well, what should I do for this package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 10 10:31:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2006 05:31:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 200499] Review Request: In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611101031.kAAAV2WJ000634@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200499 ------- Additional Comments From work.eric at gmail.com 2006-11-10 05:31 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=140877) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=140877&action=view) BTSCO init script Here is an init script I made to get btsco running and also saves the alsa mixer values. You just need to create the file /etc/sysconfig/btsco with the line: BTADDR="XX:XX:XX:XX:XX:XX" I thought this might be nice to add to your package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 10 10:45:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2006 05:45:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 212704] Review Request: manedit - UNIX Manual Page Editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611101045.kAAAjJ0X002132@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: manedit - UNIX Manual Page Editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212704 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-11-10 05:45 EST ------- The spec file seems right to me, however I have spotted some compilers warnings that are worrisome, and for some of them certainly easy to fix: There are many warnings about signedness: pointer targets in passing argument 2 of '__builtin___strncpy_chk' differ in signedness I think this could be investigated. I don't know exactly what is the potential impact of such warnings, but I guess in some cases there is room for trouble. Some include files are certainly not used as they should, I think this should be fixed, as it is easy to fix and it may uncover other issues: editor.c:199: warning: implicit declaration of function 'memcpy' editor.c:199: warning: incompatible implicit declaration of built-in function 'memcpy' There are also these warnings: editorop.c:1146: warning: ignoring return value of 'mkstemp', declared with attribute warn_unused_result maneditop.c:566: warning: ignoring return value of 'mkstemp', declared with attribute warn_unused_result viewerfio.c:177: warning: ignoring return value of 'mkstemp', declared with attribute warn_unused_result viewerfio.c:181: warning: ignoring return value of 'mkstemp', declared with attribute warn_unused_result And lastly (but maybe this should be better sent upstream) prefop.c: In function 'PrefDoApply': prefop.c:107: warning: 'gdk_color.pixel' is used uninitialized in this function There are other warnings, but they don't seem to be problematic to me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 10 11:09:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2006 06:09:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214966] New: Review Request: panelfm - Quick File Manager Applet Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214966 Summary: Review Request: panelfm - Quick File Manager Applet Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~mtasaka/dist/extras/development/SPECS/panelfm.spec SRPM URL: http://www.ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~mtasaka/dist/extras/development/SRPMS/panelfm-1.1-1.src.rpm Description: PanelFM is a GNOME applet that provides quick access to the file system. It uses popup menus to display files and directories. Multiple root points can be defined for the main menu by creating a .panelfmrc containing a list of root points, one on each line. Each root point must be an absolute path name. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 10 11:14:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2006 06:14:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214966] Review Request: panelfm - Quick File Manager Applet In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611101114.kAABEtSc003803@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: panelfm - Quick File Manager Applet https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214966 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-11-10 06:14 EST ------- Oops... http://www.ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~mtasaka/dist/extras/development/SPECS/panelfm.spec http://www.ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~mtasaka/dist/extras/development/SRPMS/panelfm-1.1-2.src.rpm * Fri Nov 10 2006 Mamoru Tasaka - 1.1-2 - Change BuildRoot -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 10 11:15:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2006 06:15:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214967] New: Review Request: arpack - Fortran77 subroutines for solving large scale eigenvalue problems Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214967 Summary: Review Request: arpack - Fortran77 subroutines for solving large scale eigenvalue problems Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://dl.atrpms.net/all/arpack.spec SRPM URL: http://dl.atrpms.net/all/arpack-2.1-5.at.src.rpm Description: ARPACK is a collection of Fortran77 subroutines designed to solve large scale eigenvalue problems. The package is designed to compute a few eigenvalues and corresponding eigenvectors of a general n by n matrix A. It is most appropriate for large sparse or structured matrices A where structured means that a matrix-vector product w <- Av requires order n rather than the usual order n**2 floating point operations. This software is based upon an algorithmic variant of the Arnoldi process called the Implicitly Restarted Arnoldi Method (IRAM). ============================================================================ rpmlint gives W: arpack invalid-license Freely distributable W: arpack no-documentation W: arpack-devel invalid-license Freely distributable documentation is in the devel package, and the license is a BSD derived one (so maybe BSD-like would be more appropriate). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 10 11:17:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2006 06:17:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214967] Review Request: arpack - Fortran77 subroutines for solving large scale eigenvalue problems In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611101117.kAABHnjI004008@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: arpack - Fortran77 subroutines for solving large scale eigenvalue problems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214967 Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |qspencer at ieee.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 10 11:30:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2006 06:30:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214967] Review Request: arpack - Fortran77 subroutines for solving large scale eigenvalue problems In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611101130.kAABUnAO004687@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: arpack - Fortran77 subroutines for solving large scale eigenvalue problems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214967 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pertusus at free.fr ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-11-10 06:30 EST ------- I fear this is not possible to include in fedora due to the licensing. As a first remark it is not BSD-like, since there is this clause (which is acceptable): * If you modify the source for these routines we ask that you change the name of the routine and comment the changes made to the original. And then there is those clauses which seem to be unacceptable to me: * Written notification is provided to the developers of intent to use this software. This is a restriction on use which seems to strong to me for that software to be OSI-compliant. * Also, we ask that use of ARPACK is properly cited in any resulting publications or software documentation. Depending on what exactly 'ask' means (is it an option, or is it an obligation?) it may also be a restriction on use which is too strong to reach OSI-compliance. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 10 12:37:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2006 07:37:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213832] Review Request: arpwatch - Network monitoring tools for tracking IP addresses on a network In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611101237.kAACbn4f008327@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: arpwatch - Network monitoring tools for tracking IP addresses on a network https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213832 ------- Additional Comments From mlichvar at redhat.com 2006-11-10 07:37 EST ------- (In reply to comment #10) > As you require /usr/sbin/sendmail you should probably also BuildRequire it > because otherwise the /usr/lib/sendmail default from the configure script will > be used. Ok. > The snmpwalk non-requirement looks to me like a non issue because user running > the arpfetch command will get a message snmpwalk not found if it is not there. > And I wouldn't say that the script is non functional, it just requires > installation of another package. I moved the arpfetch to %doc in the 1.1 release. > The release number should be probably just a single number (+ disttag) for FC devel. Yes, I have used the minor number just for this reviewing process. (In reply to comment #11) > > The scripts aren't one-to-one copy of the scriptlets from guidelines but I don't > > think it is mandatory to have one-to-one copy if they work the same. > > I agree on the principle, but I'd like to have some explanations. > Is it true that they work the same? Is it sure that the exit 0 is enough > to avoid any failure? Some snippets on the wiki page have ||:, is it > unusefull? rpm checks return code of the program executing the scriptlet, /bin/sh in this case, and exit 0 guarantees it will return 0. This is the same as adding "||:" to the last command in the script. > * why isn't the useradd only done for the first install? - the user may get deleted after first install or there could be an upgrade from a broken/ancient version of arpwatch and arpwatch doesn't even start without the user (with default config) - other packages do the same -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 10 13:48:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2006 08:48:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213832] Review Request: arpwatch - Network monitoring tools for tracking IP addresses on a network In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611101348.kAADmxUv012603@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: arpwatch - Network monitoring tools for tracking IP addresses on a network https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213832 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-11-10 08:48 EST ------- > rpm checks return code of the program executing the scriptlet, /bin/sh in this > case, and exit 0 guarantees it will return 0. This is the same as adding "||:" > to the last command in the script. Ok. > > * why isn't the useradd only done for the first install? > > - the user may get deleted after first install or Do we really want to readd the user even if the admin removed it? > there could be an upgrade from > a broken/ancient version of arpwatch and arpwatch doesn't even start without the > user (with default config) What arpwatch version could it be? Is it a real or a theoretical issue? > - other packages do the same That's not a reason to do the same. Other packages may be broken. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 10 14:21:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2006 09:21:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214967] Review Request: arpack - Fortran77 subroutines for solving large scale eigenvalue problems In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611101421.kAAEL0ZS015615@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: arpack - Fortran77 subroutines for solving large scale eigenvalue problems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214967 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rdieter at math.unl.edu ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-11-10 09:20 EST ------- Patrice's concerns appear valid, though imo the only problematic licensing statement is the bit about "Written notification is provided to the developers...". That's one of the more poorly worded and silly license requirements I've seen in awhile. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 10 14:27:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2006 09:27:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214985] New: Review Request: pachi - Pachi El Marciano - Platform Game Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214985 Summary: Review Request: pachi - Pachi El Marciano - Platform Game Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/pachi.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/pachi-1.0-1.src.rpm Description: Pachi El Marciano is a cool 2D platform game inspired by the likes of Manic Miner, Jet Set Willy, and more from the '80s. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 10 14:50:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2006 09:50:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 200666] Review Request: theora-exp - Experimental theora decoder In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611101450.kAAEo8L1017581@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: theora-exp - Experimental theora decoder https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200666 ------- Additional Comments From dmitry at butskoy.name 2006-11-10 09:50 EST ------- > The fact that libtheora-devel doesn't own it is a bug. Yep. > Will you file this, or shall I? Better you... ;) I think it would be better to not own /usr/include/theora/ dir by this package. First, in hope that libtheora-devel will fix this issue soon (and after the fixing no any changes for theora-exp-devel's %files section will be required). Second, let's consider such Core's package behaviour as a precedent, which allows us to do the same (at least for a while). Otherwise this issue is a blocker, which prevents the including of theora-exp until libtheora-devel will be fixed, which might require unpredictable amount of time. In other parts, new .spec file is OK. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 10 14:55:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2006 09:55:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214967] Review Request: arpack - Fortran77 subroutines for solving large scale eigenvalue problems In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611101455.kAAEtDE7017956@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: arpack - Fortran77 subroutines for solving large scale eigenvalue problems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214967 ------- Additional Comments From qspencer at ieee.org 2006-11-10 09:55 EST ------- For what it's worth, arpack is in Debian, and binaries are distributed by the MathWorks in MATLAB, so either everyone else has "notified the authors" or they are just ignoring this. Technically, this does not place any burden on Fedora or any repackager of Fedora, but on the end user. Realistically, it will be ignored by users of Fedora as I'm sure it has been by virtually every other user. I was going to try contacting the authors, but I thought I would make sure nobody else here has or intends to so that they don't get multiple identical requests about the same thing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 10 15:04:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2006 10:04:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214967] Review Request: arpack - Fortran77 subroutines for solving large scale eigenvalue problems In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611101504.kAAF48C6018561@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: arpack - Fortran77 subroutines for solving large scale eigenvalue problems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214967 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-11-10 10:04 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > For what it's worth, arpack is in Debian, and binaries are distributed by the > MathWorks in MATLAB, so either everyone else has "notified the authors" or they > are just ignoring this. You should also contact the debian people, their copyright at http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/main/a/arpack/arpack_2.1-8/copyright state that it is public domain... > Technically, this does not place any burden on Fedora or any repackager of > Fedora, but on the end user. Realistically, it will be ignored by users of > Fedora as I'm sure it has been by virtually every other user. It doesn't matter, it is not OSI-compliant. Users ignoring the clause don't have the right to use it. I think it is the same for * Also, we ask that use of ARPACK is properly cited in any resulting publications or software documentation. except if 'ask' isn't a requirement. But is it sure that it isn't a requirement? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 10 15:17:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2006 10:17:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 212704] Review Request: manedit - UNIX Manual Page Editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611101517.kAAFHUKQ019550@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: manedit - UNIX Manual Page Editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212704 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-11-10 10:17 EST ------- Okay, I will check the warnings later. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 10 15:34:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2006 10:34:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 200666] Review Request: theora-exp - Experimental theora decoder In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611101534.kAAFYDiF020882@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: theora-exp - Experimental theora decoder https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200666 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-11-10 10:34 EST ------- (In reply to comment #11) > I think it would be better to not own /usr/include/theora/ dir by this package. > First, in hope that libtheora-devel will fix this issue soon (and after the > fixing no any changes for theora-exp-devel's %files section will be required). > Second, let's consider such Core's package behaviour as a precedent, which > allows us to do the same (at least for a while). Otherwise this issue is a > blocker, which prevents the including of theora-exp until libtheora-devel will > be fixed, which might require unpredictable amount of time. > I don't see how this is a blocker, independent of libtheora-devel being fixed this package must still own /usr/include/theora, because quoting from the review guidelines: "MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory." And since this package does not and will not Require libtheora-devel, because it simply doesn't need it, it thus MUST own that directory. And having multiple owners for directories, although undesirable is not a blocker. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 10 15:41:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2006 10:41:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214967] Review Request: arpack - Fortran77 subroutines for solving large scale eigenvalue problems In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611101541.kAAFfr65021820@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: arpack - Fortran77 subroutines for solving large scale eigenvalue problems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214967 ------- Additional Comments From Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net 2006-11-10 10:41 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > I was going to try contacting the authors, but I thought I would make sure > nobody else here has or intends to so that they don't get multiple identical > requests about the same thing. That was my next idea, too, after reading Patrice's (valid) remarks. Can you put me into the Cc:? Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 10 16:09:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2006 11:09:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 200666] Review Request: theora-exp - Experimental theora decoder In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611101609.kAAG9v91024432@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: theora-exp - Experimental theora decoder https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200666 dmitry at butskoy.name changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From dmitry at butskoy.name 2006-11-10 11:09 EST ------- > And having multiple owners for directories, although undesirable > is not a blocker. Oh, yes, I just forgot about this recent policy change. :) rpmlint OK Must/should items OK APPROVED! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 10 16:26:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2006 11:26:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 187843] Review Request: phpMyAdmin - Web based MySQL browser written in php In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611101626.kAAGQ2Kv025810@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: phpMyAdmin - Web based MySQL browser written in php https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187843 imlinux at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From imlinux at gmail.com 2006-11-10 11:25 EST ------- imported. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 10 16:34:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2006 11:34:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214124] Review Request: bogl - a graphics library and an Unicode terminal emulator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611101634.kAAGY4il026593@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bogl - a graphics library and an Unicode terminal emulator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214124 mitr at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 10 16:48:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2006 11:48:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213600] Review Request: tinyca2 - Simple graphical userinterface to manage a small CA In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611101648.kAAGmsU2027715@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tinyca2 - Simple graphical userinterface to manage a small CA https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213600 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-11-10 11:48 EST ------- NOTE: * would you consider using braces {} for using macro? I think using braces should make spec file easier to read...... Well, 1. From http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines : * License - (NOT A BLOCKER) original tarball does not include the copy of GPL license. You should ask upstream to include GPL copy. * Desktop files - For desktop-file-install, the line "--add-category X-Fedora" should be removed as * this is of no use any longer. * original desktop-file-utils 0.11 refuses this (although Fedora patched against this to only warn against this). See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/DesktopFiles 2. From http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines = Nothing 3. Other things I have noticed : * desktop file - (NOT A BROCKER) I strongly recommend that you install a icon which can be used for desktop entry and write to the spec file where (or how) we can get the icon. However, for a quick look I cannot find a proper icon from http://tinyca.sm-zone.net/ .... Would you ask upstream to provide a icon? Consider the comments above. However I can approve this package now. ---------------------------------------------------------- This package (tinyca2) is APPROVED by me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 10 16:59:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2006 11:59:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 177828] Review Request: python-libtidy - Python bindings for libtidy In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611101659.kAAGxv7U028625@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-libtidy - Python bindings for libtidy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177828 ------- Additional Comments From jamatos at fc.up.pt 2006-11-10 11:59 EST ------- Konstantin are you still interested in submitting this package? If the answer is yes I will proceed with the review. :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 10 17:08:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2006 12:08:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 206478] Review Request: Yumdiff - Compares RPMS installed on local and remote systems In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611101708.kAAH8ODp029241@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Yumdiff - Compares RPMS installed on local and remote systems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206478 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2006-11-10 12:08 EST ------- New files, now with man page. Spec URL: http://gryffindor.jcomserv.net/yumdiff/yumdiff-1.1-2.spec SRPM URL: http://gryffindor.jcomserv.net/yumdiff/yumdiff-1.1-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 10 17:21:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2006 12:21:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 200666] Review Request: theora-exp - Experimental theora decoder In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611101721.kAAHLxhD030276@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: theora-exp - Experimental theora decoder https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200666 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-11-10 12:21 EST ------- Thanks, imported and build, closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 10 17:26:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2006 12:26:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 200666] Review Request: theora-exp - Experimental theora decoder In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611101726.kAAHQ5Wv030657@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: theora-exp - Experimental theora decoder https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200666 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 10 18:09:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2006 13:09:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215037] New: Review Request:
- Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215037 Summary: Review Request:
- Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: somlo at cmu.edu QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.contrib.andrew.cmu.edu/~somlo/aumix.spec SRPM URL: http://www.contrib.andrew.cmu.edu/~somlo/aumix-2.8-1.src.rpm Description: An audio mixer with a compact visual layout based on ncurses. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 10 18:10:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2006 13:10:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215038] New: Review Request: aumix - ncurses based audio mixer Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215038 Summary: Review Request: aumix - ncurses based audio mixer Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: somlo at cmu.edu QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.contrib.andrew.cmu.edu/~somlo/aumix.spec SRPM URL: http://www.contrib.andrew.cmu.edu/~somlo/aumix-2.8-1.src.rpm Description: An audio mixer with a compact visual layout based on ncurses. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 10 18:12:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2006 13:12:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215037] Review Request:
- In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611101812.kAAICsjv003270@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request:
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215037 somlo at cmu.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request:
- - |summary here> Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE ------- Additional Comments From somlo at cmu.edu 2006-11-10 13:12 EST ------- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 215038 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 10 18:12:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2006 13:12:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215038] Review Request: aumix - ncurses based audio mixer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611101812.kAAICtvC003275@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aumix - ncurses based audio mixer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215038 ------- Additional Comments From somlo at cmu.edu 2006-11-10 13:12 EST ------- *** Bug 215037 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 10 18:13:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2006 13:13:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215037] Review Request:
- In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611101813.kAAIDgpr003404@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request:
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215037 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-11-10 13:13 EST ------- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 215038 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 10 18:13:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2006 13:13:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215038] Review Request: aumix - ncurses based audio mixer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611101813.kAAIDgNQ003413@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aumix - ncurses based audio mixer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215038 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-11-10 13:13 EST ------- *** Bug 215037 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 10 19:01:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2006 14:01:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214764] Review Request: hunspell - split hunspell out from OpenOffice.org In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611101901.kAAJ1oxc008025@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hunspell - split hunspell out from OpenOffice.org https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214764 katzj at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |katzj at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From katzj at redhat.com 2006-11-10 14:01 EST ------- So, what are the chances of actually making it so that we don't have the continued gross duplication of spell checking functionality and dictionaries between hunspell and aspell? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 10 19:15:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2006 14:15:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214764] Review Request: hunspell - split hunspell out from OpenOffice.org In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611101915.kAAJFNBU009149@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hunspell - split hunspell out from OpenOffice.org https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214764 ------- Additional Comments From caolanm at redhat.com 2006-11-10 14:15 EST ------- That's related but not quite what this mini-task is for, this is just to get the libhunspell independent of OOo, no dictionaries are included in libhunspell itself. At the moment you've got OOo, firefox and sort-of vim all hauling effectively copies of the same hunspell/myspell format dictionaries around. I say we at least split libhunspell out of OOo, then update firefox to use hunspell instead of myspell. Split the myspell/hunspell dictionaries out of firefox and OOo and put them in one place under e.g. /usr/share/hunspell The duplication of data between aspell and hunspell is still a problem, one of them needs to read the format of the other. bug 207571 relates to dictionary data proliferation -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 10 19:44:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2006 14:44:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214764] Review Request: hunspell - split hunspell out from OpenOffice.org In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611101944.kAAJi7o8010875@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hunspell - split hunspell out from OpenOffice.org https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214764 ------- Additional Comments From caolanm at redhat.com 2006-11-10 14:44 EST ------- FWIW a sample dictionary src.rpm for Afrikaans would look something like... http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/hunspell/hunspell-af-0.20060117-1.src.rpm demo hunspell invocation to use above... > echo foome | hunspell -d af_ZA Hunspell 1.1.4 & foome 1 0: fooie -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 10 21:53:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2006 16:53:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214985] Review Request: pachi - Pachi El Marciano - Platform Game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611102153.kAALrBKF019201@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pachi - Pachi El Marciano - Platform Game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214985 michel.salim at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |michel.salim at gmail.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 10 21:57:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2006 16:57:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214985] Review Request: pachi - Pachi El Marciano - Platform Game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611102157.kAALvxHa019472@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pachi - Pachi El Marciano - Platform Game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214985 ------- Additional Comments From michel.salim at gmail.com 2006-11-10 16:57 EST ------- Will do a full review later this evening, but quick question: why is the Pachi binary SUID root? I've not had time to test it much, but the game starts and acts normally when I removed its SUID bit. (one rpmlint error on the binary from this) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 10 22:03:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2006 17:03:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213511] Review Request: gxine - Gnome frontend for the xine multimedia library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611102203.kAAM3PJr019662@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gxine - Gnome frontend for the xine multimedia library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213511 ------- Additional Comments From michel.salim at gmail.com 2006-11-10 17:03 EST ------- ping. The package is almost ready, if you fix comment #14 and nothing else is wrong I'll approve it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 10 22:45:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2006 17:45:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214985] Review Request: pachi - Pachi El Marciano - Platform Game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611102245.kAAMjALt022030@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pachi - Pachi El Marciano - Platform Game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214985 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-11-10 17:45 EST ------- It isn't suid root, its sgid games, unless something has gone wrong. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 10 23:41:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2006 18:41:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213192] Review Request: python-nltk_lite - Natural Language Toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611102341.kAANffYu024185@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-nltk_lite - Natural Language Toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213192 jamatos at fc.up.pt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jamatos at fc.up.pt 2006-11-10 18:41 EST ------- Review for release 1: * RPM name is OK * Source nltk_lite-0.6.6.tar.gz is the same as upstream * This is the latest version * Builds fine in mock * rpmlint looks OK * File list looks OK * License is correct and acceptable for Fedora (GPL) * Package is code not content * Package follows guidelines * Spec file is readable and written in American English * Requires and Build Requires are the necessary One small question though, why do you set CFLAGS since this package is noarch? Regardless this is not a blocker and this package is Approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 10 23:44:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2006 18:44:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213192] Review Request: python-nltk_lite - Natural Language Toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611102344.kAANi7gE024293@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-nltk_lite - Natural Language Toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213192 jamatos at fc.up.pt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jamatos at fc.up.pt -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 10 23:46:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2006 18:46:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213192] Review Request: python-nltk_lite - Natural Language Toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611102346.kAANkx39024422@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-nltk_lite - Natural Language Toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213192 jamatos at fc.up.pt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 11 00:15:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2006 19:15:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 177828] Review Request: python-libtidy - Python bindings for libtidy In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611110015.kAB0Fuo0025052@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-libtidy - Python bindings for libtidy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177828 jamatos at fc.up.pt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jamatos at fc.up.pt -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 11 01:24:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2006 20:24:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214985] Review Request: pachi - Pachi El Marciano - Platform Game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611110124.kAB1Ou4H026797@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pachi - Pachi El Marciano - Platform Game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214985 ------- Additional Comments From michel.salim at gmail.com 2006-11-10 20:24 EST ------- Almost done - building my mock cache so I can rebuild the package in mock. Last question: where is ImageMagick used in the build process? MUST: rpmlint OK spec name OK license OK spec language OK spec readability OK source verification OK compilation (x86_64) OK BuildRequires OK files & directory ownerships OK SHOULD: icon cache updated on post & postun OK GAMES: - SGID dropped once score file opened OK -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 11 02:18:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2006 21:18:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 211834] Review Request: gaim-libnotify - libnotify notification plugin for gaim In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611110218.kAB2Il38028087@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gaim-libnotify - libnotify notification plugin for gaim https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211834 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-11-10 21:18 EST ------- I will review this later. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 11 02:29:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2006 21:29:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 212923] Review Request: php-pear-XML-RSS - RSS parser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611110229.kAB2TIcs028318@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-XML-RSS - RSS parser Alias: pear-XML-RSS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212923 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 11 02:29:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2006 21:29:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 212925] Review Request: php-pear-Structures-DataGrid-DataSource-RSS - DataSource driver using RSS files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611110229.kAB2TfFY028375@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Structures-DataGrid-DataSource-RSS - DataSource driver using RSS files Alias: DG-DS-RSS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212925 Bug 212925 depends on bug 212923, which changed state. Bug 212923 Summary: Review Request: php-pear-XML-RSS - RSS parser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212923 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|NEW |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 11 02:55:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2006 21:55:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214234] Review Request: php-pear-Net-DIME - Implements Direct Internet Message Encapsulation (DIME) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611110255.kAB2tQTh028939@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Net-DIME - Implements Direct Internet Message Encapsulation (DIME) Alias: pear-Net-DIME https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214234 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2006-11-10 21:55 EST ------- ==== REVIEW CHECKLIST ==== - rpmlint output clean - package named according to package naming guidelines - spec filename matches package %{name} - package meets packaging guidelines - package licensed with open source compatible license - license matches actual license - license file included in %doc - spec file written in American english - spec file legible - sources match upstream 5e740eff36c049f4dcb348c6fb24da11 Net_DIME-0.3.tgz - successfully compiles and builds on FC5 x86_64 - all build dependencies listed in BR - no locales - does not store a shared library - package is not relocatable - package owns all directories it creates - no duplicates listed in %files - file permissions set properly - contains proper %clean section - macro usage is consistent - package contains code - no large documentation files - no header files or static libraries - no pkgconfig files - no devel subpackage required - no .la files - not a GUI app needing a .desktop file - package does not own files or directories owned by other packages APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 11 05:54:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2006 00:54:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214985] Review Request: pachi - Pachi El Marciano - Platform Game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611110554.kAB5sDJq004277@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pachi - Pachi El Marciano - Platform Game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214985 michel.salim at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From michel.salim at gmail.com 2006-11-11 00:54 EST ------- Package works OK in mock. APPROVED (though I'm still curious where ImageMagick is used) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 11 08:05:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2006 03:05:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214985] Review Request: pachi - Pachi El Marciano - Platform Game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611110805.kAB85WQn006728@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pachi - Pachi El Marciano - Platform Game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214985 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-11-11 03:05 EST ------- ImageMagick is needed for the convert command, which is used to convert the .ico file to a png file. Thanks for the review! Imported and build, closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 11 09:44:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2006 04:44:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214966] Review Request: panelfm - Quick File Manager Applet In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611110944.kAB9iIrQ012888@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: panelfm - Quick File Manager Applet https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214966 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |panemade at gmail.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-11-11 04:44 EST ------- Nice application will take this for official review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 11 09:45:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2006 04:45:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215038] Review Request: aumix - ncurses based audio mixer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611110945.kAB9j3q5012961@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aumix - ncurses based audio mixer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215038 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: aumix - |Review Request: aumix - |ncurses based audio mixer |ncurses based audio mixer AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-11-11 04:45 EST ------- Nice application will take this for official review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 11 09:46:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2006 04:46:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214966] Review Request: panelfm - Quick File Manager Applet In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611110946.kAB9kU2R013060@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: panelfm - Quick File Manager Applet https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214966 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 11 09:46:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2006 04:46:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215038] Review Request: aumix - ncurses based audio mixer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611110946.kAB9kVGw013068@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aumix - ncurses based audio mixer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215038 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 11 10:46:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2006 05:46:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214818] Review Request: audacious+audacious-plugins - A GTK2 based media player similar to xmms In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611111046.kABAkSXA016267@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: audacious+audacious-plugins - A GTK2 based media player similar to xmms https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214818 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |panemade at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-11-11 05:46 EST ------- I think you should submit plugins as a different review request package instead to review both packages here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 11 10:46:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2006 05:46:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 182027] Review Request: postgrey In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611111046.kABAkSD7016262@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: postgrey https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=182027 rhbugs at greebo.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rhbugs at greebo.org ------- Additional Comments From rhbugs at greebo.org 2006-11-11 05:46 EST ------- Seems to be about that time again: "Is this dead or merely comatose?" Last post from the assigned party was about nine months ago. This would be very nice to have as an extra rather than manually installing/updating. This is a tool which significantly reduces spam -- making admins lives easier and Fedora/Redhat look more appealing. It seems that rcoker has removed the copy he placed on his personal site, but the official home can be found here: http://isg.ee.ethz.ch/tools/postgrey/ Current assigned owner: Please either move on this, re-assign to someone with enough cycles available, or kill the bug report so another can be submitted. Nine months -- we're talking about a small and fairly functional package -- not a baby. ;) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 11 10:57:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2006 05:57:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 182027] Review Request: postgrey In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611111057.kABAvvku016635@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: postgrey https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=182027 ------- Additional Comments From rhbugs at greebo.org 2006-11-11 05:57 EST ------- BTW- I'm not trying to insult the efforts of Mike and Thomas -- thanks to both of you for continuing to work on this. I'm just concerned because the bug appears to be off the radar of the current owner... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 11 11:04:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2006 06:04:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215038] Review Request: aumix - ncurses based audio mixer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611111104.kABB4E7B016865@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aumix - ncurses based audio mixer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215038 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-11-11 06:04 EST ------- unable to post review. I think bugzilla is running slow -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 11 11:21:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2006 06:21:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215038] Review Request: aumix - ncurses based audio mixer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611111121.kABBLGj4017567@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aumix - ncurses based audio mixer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215038 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-11-11 06:21 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (development i386) for FC6. + rpmlint is silent for RPM and SRPM. + source files match upstream. dc3fc7209752207c23e7c94ab886b340 aumix-2.8.tar.bz2 + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written but NOT properly indented. + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. License text included in package. + %doc is small; no -doc subpackage required. + %doc does not affect runtime. + COPYING included in %doc. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc files. + no -devel subpackage exists + no .la files. + translations are available + owns the directories it creates. + doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. +Requires: /bin/sh libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4) libgpm.so.1 libncurses.so.5 + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + Ncurses based GUI application APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 11 11:59:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2006 06:59:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215038] Review Request: aumix - ncurses based audio mixer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611111159.kABBxK1t019220@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aumix - ncurses based audio mixer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215038 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-11-11 06:59 EST ------- Don't forget to CLOSE this bug once you imported package in CVS -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 11 12:49:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2006 07:49:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 195485] Review Request: kdegraphics: K Desktop Environment - Graphics Applications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611111249.kABCnRhU021340@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdegraphics: K Desktop Environment - Graphics Applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195485 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |panemade at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-11-11 07:49 EST ------- Howcome this bug is still open since 4 months with no progress made here? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 11 13:54:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2006 08:54:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 175168] Review Request: gideon - GUI designer for GTK/C++ In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611111354.kABDse3Y023542@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gideon - GUI designer for GTK/C++ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175168 denis at poolshark.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX ------- Additional Comments From denis at poolshark.org 2006-11-11 08:54 EST ------- Closing. Looks like upstream is truly dead. Sad. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 11 14:04:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2006 09:04:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214966] Review Request: panelfm - Quick File Manager Applet In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611111404.kABE4iWh024357@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: panelfm - Quick File Manager Applet https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214966 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-11-11 09:04 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (development i386) for FC6. + rpmlint is silent for RPM and SRPM. + source files match upstream. 5a18f0beba718d6efaace22ed13c1b9e panelfm.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written but NOT properly indented. + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. License text included in package. + %doc is small; no -doc subpackage required. + %doc does not affect runtime. + COPYING included in %doc. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc files. + no -devel subpackage exists + no .la files. + no translations available + owns the directories it creates. + doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + GUI related pannel applet application APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 11 14:06:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2006 09:06:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214966] Review Request: panelfm - Quick File Manager Applet In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611111406.kABE6NMK024524@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: panelfm - Quick File Manager Applet https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214966 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-11-11 09:06 EST ------- Don't Forget to CLOSE this bug after you build package -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 11 14:38:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2006 09:38:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214966] Review Request: panelfm - Quick File Manager Applet In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611111438.kABEcmgf025488@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: panelfm - Quick File Manager Applet https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214966 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-11-11 09:38 EST ------- Well, * Build for FE-devel succeeded. * SyncNeeded is requested for FE-6, FE-5. Now I close this bug as CLOSED NEXTRELEASE. Thank you for reviewing and approving this package!! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 11 14:57:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2006 09:57:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 211834] Review Request: gaim-libnotify - libnotify notification plugin for gaim In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611111457.kABEvQkj025891@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gaim-libnotify - libnotify notification plugin for gaim https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211834 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-11-11 09:57 EST ------- Well, first review for this package: 1. From http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines : * Use rpmlint * Changelogs Rpmlint says: -------------------------------------------- W: gaim-libnotify no-version-in-last-changelog -------------------------------------------- Add the specific version to Changelog. For example: * Mon Oct 23 2006 Jon Nettleton - 0.12-2 - Fixiup spec file for acceptance into Extras * BuildRequires - libtool This is not required for BuildRequires. I can rebuild this by mockbuild without libtool. 2. From http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines : = Nothing. Fix the issues above. --------------------------------------------- NOTE: Before being sponsored: This package will be accepted with another few work. But before I accept this package, someone (I am a candidate) should sponsor you. Once you are sponsored, you have the right to formally review other submitters' review request and approve the packages. For this reason, the person who want to be sponsored (like you) are required to "show that you have an understanding of the process and of the packaging guidelines". Usually there are two ways to show this. A. submit other review requests with enough quality. B. Do a "pre-review" (at the time you are not sponsored, you cannot do a formal review) of other person's review request. Please check the details on http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/HowToGetSponsored ----------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 11 15:42:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2006 10:42:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214457] Review Request: php-pear-Cache - Framework for caching of arbitrary data In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611111542.kABFgxSt027250@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Cache - Framework for caching of arbitrary data Alias: php-pear-Cache https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214457 Fedora at FamilleCollet.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG ------- Additional Comments From Fedora at FamilleCollet.com 2006-11-11 10:42 EST ------- Push to CVS with macro changes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 11 15:43:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2006 10:43:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214457] Review Request: php-pear-Cache - Framework for caching of arbitrary data In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611111543.kABFhNmN027274@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Cache - Framework for caching of arbitrary data Alias: php-pear-Cache https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214457 Fedora at FamilleCollet.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|NOTABUG |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 11 15:50:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2006 10:50:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214311] Review Request: kcometen3 - An OpenGL screensaver for KDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611111550.kABFoTRf027478@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kcometen3 - An OpenGL screensaver for KDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214311 packages at amiga-hardware.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From packages at amiga-hardware.com 2006-11-11 10:50 EST ------- Built successfully. closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 11 15:57:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2006 10:57:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 182027] Review Request: postgrey In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611111557.kABFv34F027753@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: postgrey https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=182027 ------- Additional Comments From bugs.michael at gmx.net 2006-11-11 10:57 EST ------- Guys, the package submitter has not responded since 2006-02-19, so don't wait forever. If you review and approve a competing package, just do it. Nowhere is written that one stalled review blocks other more active package submissions. No mercy. Russell probably is busy and could still join as a co-maintainer later. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 11 15:57:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2006 10:57:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 210790] Review Request: dar - Collection of scripts for making/restoring CD/DVD backups In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611111557.kABFvb26027785@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dar - Collection of scripts for making/restoring CD/DVD backups https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210790 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-11-11 10:57 EST ------- Now I am alive and please submit a new srpm when you create it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 11 16:39:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2006 11:39:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214818] Review Request: audacious+audacious-plugins - A GTK2 based media player similar to xmms In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611111639.kABGdsWj028938@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: audacious+audacious-plugins - A GTK2 based media player similar to xmms https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214818 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-11-11 11:39 EST ------- Ok. I will like to review this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 11 16:44:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2006 11:44:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214746] Review Request: eiciel - Graphical access control list (ACL) editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611111644.kABGixfd029048@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eiciel - Graphical access control list (ACL) editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214746 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-11-11 11:44 EST ------- Ok. I will like to review this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 11 17:08:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2006 12:08:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 195485] Review Request: kdegraphics: K Desktop Environment - Graphics Applications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611111708.kABH88uc029679@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdegraphics: K Desktop Environment - Graphics Applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195485 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-11-11 12:08 EST ------- No one has (yet) to step up to review it? Part of the problem is my fault, I hadn't posted any updates for awhile: Spec URL: http://kde-redhat.unl.edu/apt/kde-redhat/SPECS/kdegraphics.spec SRPM URL: http://kde-redhat.unl.edu/apt/kde-redhat/all/SRPMS.stable/kdegraphics-3.5.5-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 11 17:09:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2006 12:09:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214818] Review Request: audacious+audacious-plugins - A GTK2 based media player similar to xmms In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611111709.kABH9HqE029770@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: audacious+audacious-plugins - A GTK2 based media player similar to xmms https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214818 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-11-11 12:09 EST ------- This package needs a lot to do still to go in FE. rpmlint -iv audacious-1.2.1-0.5.src.rpm gave W: audacious macro-in-%changelog 20 Macros are expanded in %changelog too, which can in unfortunate cases lead to the package not building at all, or other subtle unexpected conditions that affect the build. Even when that doesn't happen, the expansion results in possibly "rewriting history" on subsequent package revisions and generally odd entries eg. in source rpms, which is rarely wanted. Avoid use of macros in %changelog altogether, or use two '%'s to escape them, like '%%foo'. W: audacious macro-in-%changelog 20 Macros are expanded in %changelog too, which can in unfortunate cases lead to the package not building at all, or other subtle unexpected conditions that affect the build. Even when that doesn't happen, the expansion results in possibly "rewriting history" on subsequent package revisions and generally odd entries eg. in source rpms, which is rarely wanted. Avoid use of macros in %changelog altogether, or use two '%'s to escape them, like '%%foo'. W: audacious patch-not-applied Patch2: audacious-1.1.0-no-rpath.patch A patch is included in your package but was not applied. Refer to the patches documentation to see what's wrong. W: audacious patch-not-applied Patch5: audacious-1.1.0-amidi-backend.patch A patch is included in your package but was not applied. Refer to the patches documentation to see what's wrong. W: audacious patch-not-applied Patch8: audacious-1.1.1-playlist-twenty.patch A patch is included in your package but was not applied. Refer to the patches documentation to see what's wrong. rpmlint on audacious-libs-1.2.1-0.5.i386.rpm W: audacious-libs one-line-command-in-%post /sbin/ldconfig You should use %post -p instead of using: %post It will avoid the fork of a shell interpreter to execute your command as well as allows rpm to automatically mark the dependency on your command. W: audacious-libs one-line-command-in-%postun /sbin/ldconfig You should use %postun -p instead of using: %postun It will avoid the fork of a shell interpreter to execute your command as well as allows rpm to automatically mark the dependency on your command. rpmlint on audacious-1.2.1-0.5.i386.rpm I: audacious checking W: audacious incoherent-version-in-changelog 1.2.1-0.5.fc7 1.2.1-0.5 The last entry in %changelog contains a version identifier that is not coherent with the epoch:version-release tuple of the package. I HOPE ALL rpmlint warnings and errors are SELF-EXPLANATORY here. Resubmit package solving above errors and warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 11 17:22:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2006 12:22:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 182027] Review Request: postgrey In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611111722.kABHMIP8030494@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: postgrey https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=182027 ------- Additional Comments From giallu at gmail.com 2006-11-11 12:22 EST ------- Count me on this (I already installed it on my mail server). So, assuming Russel is too busy to bring it on, is anyone willing to take over maintainership? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 11 17:31:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2006 12:31:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215158] New: Review Request: xfce4-eyes-plugin - Eyes for the Xfce panel Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215158 Summary: Review Request: xfce4-eyes-plugin - Eyes for the Xfce panel Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fedora at christoph-wickert.de QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://home.arcor.de/christoph.wickert/fedora/extras/review/SPECS/xfce4-eyes-plugin.spec SRPM URL: http://home.arcor.de/christoph.wickert/fedora/extras/review/SRPMS/xfce4-eyes-plugin-4.3.99.1-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: A xfce4 panel plugin that adds eyes which watch your every step. Scary! In XFCE 4.2 this plugin used to be part of the xfce-toys, in 4.4 it's seperate package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 11 17:34:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2006 12:34:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214818] Review Request: audacious+audacious-plugins - A GTK2 based media player similar to xmms In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611111734.kABHYSxo031403@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: audacious+audacious-plugins - A GTK2 based media player similar to xmms https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214818 ------- Additional Comments From redhat-bugzilla at camperquake.de 2006-11-11 12:34 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) Most of > rpmlint on audacious-1.2.1-0.5.i386.rpm > I: audacious checking > W: audacious incoherent-version-in-changelog 1.2.1-0.5.fc7 1.2.1-0.5 > The last entry in %changelog contains a version identifier that is not > coherent with the epoch:version-release tuple of the package. That one will go away on it's own when built in the FE build system. Set %dist to 'fc7' in your build environment to create e-v-r tags like those created by the FE build system. The rest of them have been fixed in audacious-1.2.1-0.6, available at http://www.skytale.net/files/audacious. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 11 17:44:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2006 12:44:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214746] Review Request: eiciel - Graphical access control list (ACL) editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611111744.kABHiKq6032251@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eiciel - Graphical access control list (ACL) editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214746 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-11-11 12:44 EST ------- Still help file is showing 0.9.1 version -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 11 17:49:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2006 12:49:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215160] New: Review Request: perl-Set-Scalar - Basic set operations Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215160 Summary: Review Request: perl-Set-Scalar - Basic set operations Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jpo at di.uminho.pt QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: ftp://perl.di.uminho.pt/pub/fedora/perl-Set-Scalar.spec SRPM URL: ftp://perl.di.uminho.pt/pub/fedora/perl-Set-Scalar-1.20-1.src.rpm Description: Basic set operations. Note: This module is a build requirement of Perl::Critic 0.21. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 11 17:56:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2006 12:56:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214818] Review Request: audacious+audacious-plugins - A GTK2 based media player similar to xmms In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611111756.kABHu4UM000609@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: audacious+audacious-plugins - A GTK2 based media player similar to xmms https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214818 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-11-11 12:56 EST ------- So you can resubmit new package audacious-1.2.1-0.6 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 11 18:00:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2006 13:00:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214818] Review Request: audacious+audacious-plugins - A GTK2 based media player similar to xmms In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611111800.kABI0bJL000952@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: audacious+audacious-plugins - A GTK2 based media player similar to xmms https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214818 ------- Additional Comments From redhat-bugzilla at camperquake.de 2006-11-11 13:00 EST ------- I am not exactly with you here. The revised SRPM and spec files are available at the URL I gave in comment #4. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 11 18:19:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2006 13:19:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 212909] Review Request: php-pear-HTML-Common - Base class for other HTML classes In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611111819.kABIJKEM001982@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-HTML-Common - Base class for other HTML classes Alias: pear-HTML-Common https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212909 Fedora at FamilleCollet.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |Fedora at FamilleCollet.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 11 18:20:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2006 13:20:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 212704] Review Request: manedit - UNIX Manual Page Editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611111820.kABIKfvL002050@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: manedit - UNIX Manual Page Editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212704 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-11-11 13:20 EST ------- Well, would you check the following? http://www.ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~mtasaka/dist/extras/development/SPECS/manedit.spec http://www.ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~mtasaka/dist/extras/development/SRPMS/manedit-0.7.1-5.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 11 18:21:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2006 13:21:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214818] Review Request: audacious+audacious-plugins - A GTK2 based media player similar to xmms In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611111821.kABILSPE002100@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: audacious+audacious-plugins - A GTK2 based media player similar to xmms https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214818 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-11-11 13:21 EST ------- I have not seen any review request that contains 2 packages in a single request. So i think you an create a new review request for plugins package and make its dependent on this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 11 18:48:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2006 13:48:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 212912] Review Request: php-pear-HTML-QuickForm - Class for creating, validating, processing HTML forms In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611111848.kABImRhk003619@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-HTML-QuickForm - Class for creating, validating, processing HTML forms Alias: pear-HTML-QuickForm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212912 Fedora at FamilleCollet.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |Fedora at FamilleCollet.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 11 18:49:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2006 13:49:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 212915] Review Request: php-pear-HTML-Table - Class to easily design HTML tables In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611111849.kABIngem003689@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-HTML-Table - Class to easily design HTML tables Alias: pear-HTML-Table https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212915 Fedora at FamilleCollet.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |Fedora at FamilleCollet.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 11 18:53:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2006 13:53:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214818] Review Request: audacious+audacious-plugins - A GTK2 based media player similar to xmms In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611111853.kABIrHuM003835@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: audacious+audacious-plugins - A GTK2 based media player similar to xmms https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214818 rpm at greysector.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rpm at greysector.net ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2006-11-11 13:53 EST ------- I would suggest splitting off the more exotic plugins (i.e. the ones that bring in uncommon dependencies) into separate packages. Namely: fluidsynth amidi backend, adplug input plugin, modplug input plugin, musepack input plugin, timidity input plugin, and all output plugins except alsa/oss. What's the point of splitting off -libs from audacious? Also, I agree that there should be two separate review requests, one for the player and one for the plugins. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 11 18:55:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2006 13:55:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214818] Review Request: audacious+audacious-plugins - A GTK2 based media player similar to xmms In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611111855.kABIt36V003984@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: audacious+audacious-plugins - A GTK2 based media player similar to xmms https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214818 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at leemhuis.info 2006-11-11 13:54 EST ------- (In reply to comment #7) > I have not seen any review request that contains 2 packages in a single request. There are some, and I always wondered if we should {dis,}allow this or if we simply don't care and handle it on a case by cases basis. /me votes for "encourage people to file one review bug per package" -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 11 19:00:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2006 14:00:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 212909] Review Request: php-pear-HTML-Common - Base class for other HTML classes In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611111900.kABJ0xVR004220@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-HTML-Common - Base class for other HTML classes Alias: pear-HTML-Common https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212909 ------- Additional Comments From Fedora at FamilleCollet.com 2006-11-11 14:00 EST ------- First comment before the full review. There is no use of PEAR in HTML/Common.php, so no need to Require it (only the installer is required for the scriplet in %post/%postun). Include the PHP License in the %doc -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 11 19:05:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2006 14:05:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214818] Review Request: audacious+audacious-plugins - A GTK2 based media player similar to xmms In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611111905.kABJ52QD004335@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: audacious+audacious-plugins - A GTK2 based media player similar to xmms https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214818 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-11-11 14:05 EST ------- Ok then. I am off now will review would be modified state of this package/packages once reporter submits those changes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 11 19:06:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2006 14:06:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 212915] Review Request: php-pear-HTML-Table - Class to easily design HTML tables In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611111906.kABJ6Zd9004398@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-HTML-Table - Class to easily design HTML tables Alias: pear-HTML-Table https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212915 ------- Additional Comments From Fedora at FamilleCollet.com 2006-11-11 14:06 EST ------- First comment before the full review. All the tests provides succeed (pear run-tests -p HTML_Table) : Good. Version 1.7.5 is available, so please update. Should require HTML_Common >= 1.2.0 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 11 19:22:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2006 14:22:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 212704] Review Request: manedit - UNIX Manual Page Editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611111922.kABJMGod004993@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: manedit - UNIX Manual Page Editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212704 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 11 19:29:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2006 14:29:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215165] New: Review Request: audacious-plugins - Plugins for the Audacious media player Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215165 Summary: Review Request: audacious-plugins - Plugins for the Audacious media player Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: redhat-bugzilla at camperquake.de QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.skytale.net/files/audacious/audacious-plugins.spec SRPM URL: http://www.skytale.net/files/audacious/audacious-plugins-1.2.2-0.5.sky.src.rpm Description: Audacious is a media player that currently uses a skinned user interface based on Winamp 2.x skins. It is based on ("forked off") BMP. This package provides essential plugins for audio input, audio output and visualization. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 11 19:30:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2006 14:30:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215165] Review Request: audacious-plugins - Plugins for the Audacious media player In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611111930.kABJUbUi005378@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: audacious-plugins - Plugins for the Audacious media player https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215165 redhat-bugzilla at camperquake.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |214818 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 11 19:30:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2006 14:30:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214818] Review Request: audacious+audacious-plugins - A GTK2 based media player similar to xmms In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611111930.kABJUdnP005391@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: audacious+audacious-plugins - A GTK2 based media player similar to xmms https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214818 redhat-bugzilla at camperquake.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |215165 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 11 19:38:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2006 14:38:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214818] Review Request: audacious+audacious-plugins - A GTK2 based media player similar to xmms In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611111938.kABJcbk6005643@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: audacious+audacious-plugins - A GTK2 based media player similar to xmms https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214818 ------- Additional Comments From redhat-bugzilla at camperquake.de 2006-11-11 14:38 EST ------- I have added bug 215165 which deals with audacious-plugins -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 11 20:16:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2006 15:16:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215169] New: Review Request: xfce4-dict-plugin - A XFCE panel plugin to query a Dict server Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215169 Summary: Review Request: xfce4-dict-plugin - A XFCE panel plugin to query a Dict server Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fedora at christoph-wickert.de QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://home.arcor.de/christoph.wickert/fedora/extras/review/SPECS/xfce4-dict-plugin.spec SRPM URL: http://home.arcor.de/christoph.wickert/fedora/extras/review/SRPMS/xfce4-dict-plugin-0.2.0-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: With this plugin you can query a dictionary server (see RFC 2229) to search for the translation or explanation of a word. You can also choose a dictionary offered by the server to improve your search results. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 11 20:47:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2006 15:47:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214150] Review Request: flight-of-the-amazon-queen-cd - Flight of the Amazon Queen - Adventure Game - CD version In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611112047.kABKlH1D007491@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: flight-of-the-amazon-queen-cd - Flight of the Amazon Queen - Adventure Game - CD version Alias: scumm-amazon-CD https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214150 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2006-11-11 15:47 EST ------- That suse ftp server is *really* bad, but I did finally manage to download it. - sources match upstream 10c38ba9fd533c29cf8a26424d27a9f8 queen.1c.bz2 APPROVED ==== SHOULD ==== - I still think its a good idea to add Provides shorthands like: scummvm-sky scummvm-sky-cd scummvm-queen scummvm-queen-cd -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 11 20:50:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2006 15:50:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214872] Review Request: Ri-li - Arcade game where you drive a toy wood engine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611112050.kABKoVlZ007612@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Ri-li - Arcade game where you drive a toy wood engine Alias: Ri-li https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214872 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |chris.stone at gmail.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | Alias| |Ri-li -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 11 20:53:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2006 15:53:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214236] Review Request: php-pear-SOAP - Simple Object Access Protocol (SOAP) Client/Server for PHP In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611112053.kABKrTCt007752@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-SOAP - Simple Object Access Protocol (SOAP) Client/Server for PHP Alias: php-pear-SOAP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214236 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |chris.stone at gmail.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | Alias| |php-pear-SOAP -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 11 21:02:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2006 16:02:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 211807] Review Request: firefox2 - Mozilla Firefox 2.0 Web browser for FC6 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611112102.kABL22Oq008204@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: firefox2 - Mozilla Firefox 2.0 Web browser for FC6 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211807 bugzilla.redhat at neufeind.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bugzilla.redhat at neufeind.net ------- Additional Comments From bugzilla.redhat at neufeind.net 2006-11-11 16:02 EST ------- I'd also appreciate firefox2 in FC6. Various extensions already demand it! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 11 21:19:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2006 16:19:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 212909] Review Request: php-pear-HTML-Common - Base class for other HTML classes In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611112119.kABLJIbs008886@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-HTML-Common - Base class for other HTML classes Alias: pear-HTML-Common https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212909 ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2006-11-11 16:19 EST ------- SPEC: http://tkmame.retrogames.com/fedora-extras/php-pear-HTML-Common.spec SRPM: http://tkmame.retrogames.com/fedora-extras/php-pear-HTML-Common-1.2.3-2.src.rpm %changelog * Sat Nov 11 2006 Christopher Stone 1.2.3-2 - Add License file to %%doc - Remove Requires PEAR -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 11 21:21:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2006 16:21:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 212704] Review Request: manedit - UNIX Manual Page Editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611112121.kABLLAYf008948@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: manedit - UNIX Manual Page Editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212704 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-11-11 16:21 EST ------- (In reply to comment #29) > Well, would you check the following? > > http://www.ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~mtasaka/dist/extras/development/SPECS/manedit.spec > http://www.ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~mtasaka/dist/extras/development/SRPMS/manedit-0.7.1-5.src.rpm Everything is allright now, nice! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 11 21:26:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2006 16:26:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 212915] Review Request: php-pear-HTML-Table - Class to easily design HTML tables In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611112126.kABLQ97Q009163@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-HTML-Table - Class to easily design HTML tables Alias: pear-HTML-Table https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212915 ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2006-11-11 16:26 EST ------- SPEC: http://tkmame.retrogames.com/fedora-extras/php-pear-HTML-Table.spec SRPM: http://tkmame.retrogames.com/fedora-extras/php-pear-HTML-Table-1.7.5-1.src.rpm %changelog * Sat Nov 11 2006 Christopher Stone 1.7.5-1 - Upstream Sync - Add versioned requires -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 11 21:31:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2006 16:31:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215160] Review Request: perl-Set-Scalar - Basic set operations In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611112131.kABLVFIG009310@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Set-Scalar - Basic set operations https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215160 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |pertusus at free.fr OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-11-11 16:31 EST ------- * name is right * rpmlint is silent * licence is right, free software, not included * source match upstream ebef2b178117a07541bacfdbf7c86112 ./Set-Scalar-1.20.tar.gz * sane provides perl(Set::Scalar) = 1.20 perl(Set::Scalar::Base) perl(Set::Scalar::Null) perl(Set::Scalar::Real) perl(Set::Scalar::Universe) perl(Set::Scalar::Valued) perl(Set::Scalar::ValuedUniverse) perl(Set::Scalar::Virtual) * %files right APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 11 22:18:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2006 17:18:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215158] Review Request: xfce4-eyes-plugin - Eyes for the Xfce panel In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611112218.kABMIb7L010328@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xfce4-eyes-plugin - Eyes for the Xfce panel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215158 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: xfce4-eyes- |Review Request: xfce4-eyes- |plugin - Eyes for the Xfce |plugin - Eyes for the Xfce |panel |panel CC| |pertusus at free.fr ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-11-11 17:18 EST ------- It is possible to remove everything that owns /usr/share/xfce4/ and xfce4-eyes-plugin can still be installed. It is not obvious that xfce4-eyes-plugin should depend on a package which owns /usr/share/xfce4/, however maybe xfce4-panel should. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 11 22:29:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2006 17:29:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215158] Review Request: xfce4-eyes-plugin - Eyes for the Xfce panel In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611112229.kABMTF1d010613@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xfce4-eyes-plugin - Eyes for the Xfce panel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215158 fedora at christoph-wickert.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kevin at tummy.com ------- Additional Comments From fedora at christoph-wickert.de 2006-11-11 17:29 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > It is possible to remove everything that owns /usr/share/xfce4/ > and xfce4-eyes-plugin can still be installed. Really? The package depends on xfce4-panel, which owns /usr/share/xfce4/panel-plugins. > It is not > obvious that xfce4-eyes-plugin should depend on a package > which owns /usr/share/xfce4/, however maybe xfce4-panel should. I have been talking about that with Kevin before. CC'ing him. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 11 22:43:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2006 17:43:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215158] Review Request: xfce4-eyes-plugin - Eyes for the Xfce panel In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611112243.kABMhJvi011026@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xfce4-eyes-plugin - Eyes for the Xfce panel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215158 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-11-11 17:43 EST ------- $ rpm -qf /usr/share/xfce4 xfwm4-4.3.99.2-1.fc7 xfce4-icon-theme-4.3.99.2-1.fc7 After removing those packages and the dependent packages, xfce isn't functional anymore, but there is still certainly a packaging mistake somewhere since xfce4-panel is still there. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 11 22:48:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2006 17:48:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215158] Review Request: xfce4-eyes-plugin - Eyes for the Xfce panel In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611112248.kABMm5E9011102@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xfce4-eyes-plugin - Eyes for the Xfce panel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215158 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at christoph-wickert.de 2006-11-11 17:48 EST ------- Of course you are correct. How about this: xfce4-panel should depend on xfce4-icon-theme, since the "add new starter"-dialog uses the default xfce icons. xfce4-icon-theme also owns /usr/share/xfce4/. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 11 23:01:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2006 18:01:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215158] Review Request: xfce4-eyes-plugin - Eyes for the Xfce panel In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611112301.kABN12HT011386@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xfce4-eyes-plugin - Eyes for the Xfce panel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215158 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-11-11 18:01 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > Of course you are correct. > > How about this: xfce4-panel should depend on xfce4-icon-theme, since the "add > new starter"-dialog uses the default xfce icons. xfce4-icon-theme also owns > /usr/share/xfce4/. Right. I used a similar argument to convince Kevin to have Thunar depend on xfce4-icon-theme. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 11 23:18:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2006 18:18:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215158] Review Request: xfce4-eyes-plugin - Eyes for the Xfce panel In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611112318.kABNIfRh011807@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xfce4-eyes-plugin - Eyes for the Xfce panel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215158 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |pertusus at free.fr OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-11-11 18:18 EST ------- * follow packaging guidelines * rpmlint is silent * licence GPL match package, included * match upstream dd5bbf3f31ca7d959ec808983a419062 ./xfce4-eyes-plugin-4.3.99.1.tar.bz2 * sane provides * build and works in devel * %files right except that /usr/share/xfce4/ is unowned, but it is also the case for xfce4-panel which is the culprit here. * %doc not runtime APPROVED $ ldd -u -r /usr/libexec/xfce4/panel-plugins/xfce4-eyes-plugin Unused direct dependencies: /usr/lib/libatk-1.0.so.0 /usr/lib/libpangocairo-1.0.so.0 /usr/lib/libpango-1.0.so.0 /usr/lib/libcairo.so.2 /lib/libgmodule-2.0.so.0 /lib/libdl.so.2 Except for /lib/libdl.so.2, this should certainly be solved to avoid unneeded rebuild when those soname changes. This is not a blocker, but certainly shows some issues somewhere (upstream, or in the devel packages corresponding with the sonames). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 11 23:23:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2006 18:23:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214746] Review Request: eiciel - Graphical access control list (ACL) editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611112323.kABNNm1O011989@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eiciel - Graphical access control list (ACL) editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214746 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-11-11 18:23 EST ------- Updated -- apparently upstream included an xml file they shouldn't have... SRPM URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/eiciel-0.9.2-7.fc6.src.rpm SPEC URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/eiciel.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 12 01:36:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2006 20:36:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 189188] Review Request: sqlgrey - postfix grey-listing policy service In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611120136.kAC1aB26014723@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sqlgrey - postfix grey-listing policy service https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189188 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-11-11 20:35 EST ------- Hey Steven. Any news on this package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 12 01:37:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2006 20:37:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 193106] Review Request: gtkmozembedmm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611120137.kAC1beCr014810@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtkmozembedmm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193106 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-11-11 20:37 EST ------- Ping. Have you had a chance to look at the error in comment #11 ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 12 01:39:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2006 20:39:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 195645] Review Request: rasqal - RDF query library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611120139.kAC1dTNC014892@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rasqal - RDF query library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195645 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-11-11 20:39 EST ------- Hey Thomas. Any further news on this package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 12 01:40:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2006 20:40:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 199679] Review Request: pgpool - Connection pooling/replication server for PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611120140.kAC1eR0T014957@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pgpool - Connection pooling/replication server for PostgreSQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199679 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-11-11 20:40 EST ------- Ping Devrim. Any news on this package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 12 01:43:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2006 20:43:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 200139] Review Request: luma - A graphical tool for managing LDAP servers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611120143.kAC1h5J4015014@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: luma - A graphical tool for managing LDAP servers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200139 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-11-11 20:43 EST ------- Is there any reason this bug can't be closed now? Looks like it's been imported and owners.list updated... am I missing anything? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 12 01:44:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2006 20:44:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 200700] Review Request: clipsmm - A C++ interface to the CLIPS library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611120144.kAC1iKfF015060@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clipsmm - A C++ interface to the CLIPS library Alias: clipsmm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200700 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-11-11 20:44 EST ------- Ping Rick. Any news on this package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 12 01:47:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2006 20:47:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 208737] Review Request: ivman - Generic handler for HAL events In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611120147.kAC1lSC8015107@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ivman - Generic handler for HAL events https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208737 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-11-11 20:47 EST ------- Patrice: Any news on this package? Has upstream responded? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 12 01:52:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2006 20:52:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215158] Review Request: xfce4-eyes-plugin - Eyes for the Xfce panel In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611120152.kAC1qB8q015171@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xfce4-eyes-plugin - Eyes for the Xfce panel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215158 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-11-11 20:52 EST ------- In reply to comment #5: Yeah, I guess xfce4-panel should Requires: xfce4-icon-theme. That would fix this issue up unless I am missing something. I will queue that change for the next time I update xfce4-panel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 12 01:54:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2006 20:54:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 202334] Review Request: jetty5 - The Jetty Webserver and Servlet Container In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611120154.kAC1sBxw015225@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jetty5 - The Jetty Webserver and Servlet Container https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202334 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-11-11 20:54 EST ------- Ping Anthony. Any reply to comments #1 and #2? It's been almost 3 months since you submitted this... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 12 02:07:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2006 21:07:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 202334] Review Request: jetty5 - The Jetty Webserver and Servlet Container In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611120207.kAC27rpk015611@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jetty5 - The Jetty Webserver and Servlet Container https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202334 ------- Additional Comments From green at redhat.com 2006-11-11 21:07 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > Ping Anthony. > > Any reply to comments #1 and #2? It's been almost 3 months since you submitted > this... Woops. Yes, I can remove "jpp". I'll submit a new package shortly. Thanks, AG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 12 02:11:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2006 21:11:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 189188] Review Request: sqlgrey - postfix grey-listing policy service In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611120211.kAC2Bobb015717@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sqlgrey - postfix grey-listing policy service https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189188 ------- Additional Comments From steve at silug.org 2006-11-11 21:11 EST ------- Not yet. I'm trying to set up some new systems to test it on, but that work has been held up for various reasons. Someone is going to have my head if I don't get it working for them by Friday (11/17) though. :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 12 02:18:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2006 21:18:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 190213] Review Request: gq - Graphical LDAP directory browser and editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611120218.kAC2I63O015841@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gq - Graphical LDAP directory browser and editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190213 fedora at christoph-wickert.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |fedora at christoph-wickert.de OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From fedora at christoph-wickert.de 2006-11-11 21:18 EST ------- Terje, are you still interested in this package? If so, please update the package to the latest stable version (1.2.1 I think), I will review it then. BTW: Please use 'make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT' instead if '%makeinstall'. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 12 02:25:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2006 21:25:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215158] Review Request: xfce4-eyes-plugin - Eyes for the Xfce panel In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611120225.kAC2P6be016009@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xfce4-eyes-plugin - Eyes for the Xfce panel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215158 fedora at christoph-wickert.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From fedora at christoph-wickert.de 2006-11-11 21:25 EST ------- Thanks for the review, Patrice. (In reply to comment #6) > > $ ldd -u -r /usr/libexec/xfce4/panel-plugins/xfce4-eyes-plugin > Unused direct dependencies: > > /usr/lib/libatk-1.0.so.0 > /usr/lib/libpangocairo-1.0.so.0 > /usr/lib/libpango-1.0.so.0 > /usr/lib/libcairo.so.2 > /lib/libgmodule-2.0.so.0 > /lib/libdl.so.2 > > Except for /lib/libdl.so.2, this should certainly be solved to avoid > unneeded rebuild when those soname changes. This is not a blocker, > but certainly shows some issues somewhere (upstream, or in the > devel packages corresponding with the sonames). > I'll have to take a closer look at this, it's nearly the same for many other panel-plugins. Imported into CVS, sync fore Core 6 is requested, built for devel and added to owners.list. Closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 12 02:35:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2006 21:35:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 212003] Review Request: mugshot - Companion software for mugshot.org In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611120235.kAC2ZRAh016129@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mugshot - Companion software for mugshot.org https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212003 green at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |green at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From green at redhat.com 2006-11-11 21:35 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > Created an attachment (id=140497) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=140497&action=view) [edit] > Spec file with improved GConf scripts > This spec file refers to a newer tarball. Could you please post the updated srpm? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 12 02:54:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2006 21:54:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215185] New: Review Request: compat-libosip2-2.2.2 - compatability package for libosip2 Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215185 Summary: Review Request: compat-libosip2-2.2.2 - compatability package for libosip2 Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jeff at ocjtech.us QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://repo.ocjtech.us/misc/fedora/6/SRPMS/compat-libosip2-2.2.2-2.2.2-5.fc6.spec SRPM URL: http://repo.ocjtech.us/misc/fedora/6/SRPMS/compat-libosip2-2.2.2-2.2.2-5.fc6.src.rpm Description: oSIP is an implementation of SIP. SIP stands for the Session Initiation Protocol and is described by the rfc3261 (wich deprecates rfc2543). This library aims to provide multimedia and telecom software developers an easy and powerful interface to initiate and control SIP based sessions in their applications. SIP is a open standard replacement from IETF for H.323. linphone requires version 2.2.2 of libosip2 - newer versions of libosip2 have dropped some functionality that linphone requires. Until the linphone developers update linphone a compatibility package will be needed so that libosip2 can be updated to the latest version. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 12 02:59:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2006 21:59:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 211433] Review Request: wdm - WINGs Display Manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611120259.kAC2xRBv016504@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wdm - WINGs Display Manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211433 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-11-11 21:59 EST ------- Humm... I'm not able to build in mock. I seem to be getting (for both fc6 and devel): gcc -c -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m32 -march=i386 -mtune=generic -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I./include -I/usr/include -I/usr/include -DWITH_SELINUX -I/usr/include/selinux src/wdm/access.c -o src/wdm/access.o In file included from src/wdm/Greet.c:97: ./include/dm.h:272: error: expected specifier-qualifier-list before 'Boolean' ./include/dm.h:362: error: expected ')' before 'ctx' ./include/dm.h:423: error: expected ')' before '*' token ./include/dm.h:439: error: expected declaration specifiers or '...' before 'Display' ./include/dm.h:442: error: expected declaration specifiers or '...' before 'Display' ./include/dm.h:445: error: expected declaration specifiers or '...' before 'Display' ./include/dm.h:449: error: expected declaration specifiers or '...' before 'Display' src/wdm/Greet.c: In function 'InitGreet': src/wdm/Greet.c:202: warning: ignoring return value of 'pipe', declared with attribute warn_unused_result src/wdm/Greet.c: In function 'GreetUser': src/wdm/Greet.c:417: error: too many arguments to function 'DeleteXloginResources' src/wdm/Greet.c:375: warning: ignoring return value of 'system', declared with attribute warn_unused_result src/wdm/Greet.c:381: warning: ignoring return value of 'system', declared with attribute warn_unused_result make: *** [src/wdm/Greet.o] Error 1 make: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... In file included from src/wdm/access.c:36: ./include/dm.h:49:27: error: X11/Intrinsic.h: No such file or directory In file included from src/wdm/access.c:36: ./include/dm.h:272: error: expected specifier-qualifier-list before 'Boolean' ./include/dm.h:362: error: expected ')' before 'ctx' ./include/dm.h:423: error: expected ')' before '*' token ./include/dm.h:439: error: expected declaration specifiers or '...' before 'Display' ./include/dm.h:442: error: expected declaration specifiers or '...' before 'Display' ./include/dm.h:445: error: expected declaration specifiers or '...' before 'Display' ./include/dm.h:449: error: expected declaration specifiers or '...' before 'Display' make: *** [src/wdm/access.o] Error 1 error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.77552 (%build) Any ideas? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 12 02:59:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2006 21:59:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215185] Review Request: compat-libosip2-2.2.2 - compatability package for libosip2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611120259.kAC2xZ6f016523@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compat-libosip2-2.2.2 - compatability package for libosip2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215185 jeff at ocjtech.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |197166 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 12 03:08:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2006 22:08:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215165] Review Request: audacious-plugins - Plugins for the Audacious media player In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611120308.kAC38elY016691@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: audacious-plugins - Plugins for the Audacious media player https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215165 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 12 03:26:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2006 22:26:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215169] Review Request: xfce4-dict-plugin - A XFCE panel plugin to query a Dict server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611120326.kAC3QLrT017064@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xfce4-dict-plugin - A XFCE panel plugin to query a Dict server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215169 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |kevin at tummy.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-11-11 22:26 EST ------- Here's a review: OK - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines OK - Spec file matches base package name. OK - Spec has consistant macro usage. OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines. OK - License (GPL) OK - License field in spec matches OK - License file included in package OK - Spec in American English OK - Spec is legible. OK - Sources match upstream md5sum: ac2f3626858b7b6800ac43cc9de6e0bc xfce4-dict-plugin-0.2.0.tar.bz2 ac2f3626858b7b6800ac43cc9de6e0bc xfce4-dict-plugin-0.2.0.tar.bz2.1 OK - BuildRequires correct OK - Spec handles locales/find_lang See below - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. OK - Package has a correct %clean section. OK - Package has correct buildroot OK - Package is code or permissible content. OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime. OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch. OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files. OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. OK - Package owns all the directories it creates. OK - No rpmlint output. OK - final provides and requires are sane: SHOULD Items: OK - Should build in mock. x86_64/i386 - Should build on all supported archs OK - Should function as described. OK - Should have dist tag OK - Should package latest version Issues: 1. Should add a: %defattr(-,root,root,-) to files? 2. Should the BuildRequire for xfce4-panel-devel 4.3.99.1 be 4.3.99.2, since everything else is requiring that version? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 12 03:38:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2006 22:38:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214527] Review Request: perl-HTML-Table - Create HTML tables using simple interface In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611120338.kAC3cogj017362@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-HTML-Table - Create HTML tables using simple interface https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214527 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |kevin at tummy.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-11-11 22:38 EST ------- OK - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines OK - Spec file matches base package name. OK - Spec has consistant macro usage. OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines. OK - License OK - License field in spec matches See below - License file included in package OK - Spec in American English OK - Spec is legible. OK - Sources match upstream md5sum: 12c107450c8759e9dc0f8dea91297132 HTML-Table-2.04a.tar.gz 12c107450c8759e9dc0f8dea91297132 HTML-Table-2.04a.tar.gz.1 OK - BuildRequires correct OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. OK - Package has a correct %clean section. OK - Package has correct buildroot OK - Package is code or permissible content. OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime. OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch. OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files. OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. OK - Package owns all the directories it creates. OK - No rpmlint output. OK - final provides and requires are sane: SHOULD Items: OK - Should build in mock. OK i386/x86_64 - Should build on all supported archs OK - Should have dist tag OK - Should package latest version Issues: 1. Any chance to get upstream to include a license file? Thats not a blocker however, and thats the only issue I see... this package is APPROVED. Don't forget to close this bug NEXTRELEASE once it's been imported and built. Also, consider reviewing another package thats waiting to help spread out the reviewing load. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 12 04:08:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2006 23:08:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215185] Review Request: compat-libosip2-2.2.2 - compatability package for libosip2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611120408.kAC4869C017852@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compat-libosip2-2.2.2 - compatability package for libosip2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215185 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |kevin at tummy.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-11-11 23:08 EST ------- Wanting to help get the broken package report down some, here's a review. ;) See below - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines See below - Spec file matches base package name. OK - Spec has consistant macro usage. OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines. OK - License OK - License field in spec matches OK - License file included in package OK - Spec in American English OK - Spec is legible. OK - Sources match upstream md5sum: 40ee3ec89030f0d6dfdb2cf6100e6685 libosip2-2.2.2.tar.gz 40ee3ec89030f0d6dfdb2cf6100e6685 libosip2-2.2.2.tar.gz.1 OK - BuildRequires correct OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. OK - Package has a correct %clean section. OK - Package has correct buildroot OK - Package is code or permissible content. OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime. OK - Headers/static libs in -devel subpackage. OK - Spec has needed ldconfig in post and postun See below - .pc files in -devel subpackage/requires pkgconfig OK - .so files in -devel subpackage. OK - -devel package Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch. OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files. OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. OK - Package owns all the directories it creates. See below - No rpmlint output. OK - final provides and requires are sane: SHOULD Items: OK - Should build in mock. OK - Should build on all supported archs OK - Should have dist tag Issues: 1. Your naming doesn't seem right to me... compat-libosip2-2.2.2-2.2.2-5 should be just compat-libosip2-2.2.2-5 right? ie, the 2.2.2 in the Name should be removed. 2. Shouldn't you Provides: libosip2 = %{version}-%{release} instead of the Conflicts? Then this version will replace the older libosip2 packages and provide the same things for things like linphone? 3. The devel subpackage has a .pc file, so it should Requires: pkgconfig 4. rpmlint says: W: compat-libosip2-2.2.2 summary-not-capitalized oSIP is an implementation of SIP Can be ignored. W: compat-libosip2-2.2.2 incoherent-version-in-changelog 2.2.2-4 2.2.2-5.fc7 Missing changelog entry for changes to the compat package? E: compat-libosip2-2.2.2 obsolete-not-provided libosip2 See issue #2? W: compat-libosip2-2.2.2 summary-not-capitalized oSIP is an implementation of SIP E: compat-libosip2-2.2.2-devel obsolete-not-provided libosip2-devel Same thing with the -devel subpackage... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 12 04:29:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2006 23:29:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214669] Review Request: logserial In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611120429.kAC4TlDY018158@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: logserial https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214669 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |kevin at tummy.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-11-11 23:29 EST ------- OK - Spec has consistant macro usage. OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines. OK - License (GPL) OK - License field in spec matches See below - License file included in package OK - Spec in American English OK - Spec is legible. OK - Sources match upstream md5sum: 833fff07602e4a21f447aa194d14ecd8 logserial-0.4.2.tar.gz 833fff07602e4a21f447aa194d14ecd8 logserial-0.4.2.tar.gz.1 OK - BuildRequires correct OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. OK - Package has a correct %clean section. OK - Package has correct buildroot OK - Package is code or permissible content. OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime. OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch. OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files. OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. OK - Package owns all the directories it creates. OK - No rpmlint output. OK - final provides and requires are sane: SHOULD Items: OK - Should build in mock. x86_64/i386 - Should build on all supported archs OK - Should have dist tag OK - Should package latest version Issues: 1. Given how long since the last upstream release of this package it seems unlikely, but any chance of them including a COPYING file? 2. Instead of the flags you set in the logserial-makefile.patch perhaps you could set $RPM_OPT_FLAGS instead? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 12 04:43:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2006 23:43:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 212704] Review Request: manedit - UNIX Manual Page Editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611120443.kAC4hdWW018384@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: manedit - UNIX Manual Page Editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212704 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-11-11 23:43 EST ------- Official Review: + package builds in mock (development i386) for FC6. + rpmlint is silent for RPM and SRPM. + source files match upstream. 229586101245eb61018ff031c2efb247 manedit-0.7.1.tar.bz2 + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written but NOT properly indented. + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. License text included in package. + %doc is small; no -doc subpackage required. + %doc does not affect runtime. + COPYING included in %doc. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc files. + no -devel subpackage exists + no .la files. + no translations are available. + owns the directories it creates. + doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + Desktop file installed successfully + Desktop file is handled correctly in SPEC file. + GUI application Patrice, Need your suggestion whether this package can be approved with rendering problem in manview? I think we can accept this package and let the rendering problem be solved in next release. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 12 04:44:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2006 23:44:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214746] Review Request: eiciel - Graphical access control list (ACL) editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611120444.kAC4iorZ018405@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eiciel - Graphical access control list (ACL) editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214746 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-11-11 23:44 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (development i386) for FC6. + rpmlint is silent for RPM and SRPM. + source files match upstream. 72576cce092ff36a4fef0311bdc0dede eiciel-0.9.2.tar.bz2 + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written but NOT properly indented. + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. License text included in package. + %doc is small; no -doc subpackage required. + %doc does not affect runtime. + COPYING included in %doc. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc files. + no -devel subpackage exists + no .la files included. + translations are available. + owns the directories it creates. + doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + Desktop file installed successfully + Desktop file is handled correctly in SPEC file. + GUI application APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 12 04:47:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2006 23:47:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214746] Review Request: eiciel - Graphical access control list (ACL) editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611120447.kAC4lIY4018471@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eiciel - Graphical access control list (ACL) editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214746 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-11-11 23:47 EST ------- Don't Forget to CLOSE this bug once you imported your package in CVS -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 12 04:48:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2006 23:48:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 190346] Review Request: vdr-subtitles - DVB subtitles plugin for VDR In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611120448.kAC4m72m018497@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vdr-subtitles - DVB subtitles plugin for VDR https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190346 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |kevin at tummy.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-11-11 23:48 EST ------- To add my 2 cents, I also like to have .spec files linked to reviews. It does make it easier to see whats going on with a package without having to pull down and unpack the src.rpm. That said, here's a review of this package: OK - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines OK - Spec file matches base package name. OK - Spec has consistant macro usage. OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines. OK - License (GPL) OK - License field in spec matches OK - License file included in package OK - Spec in American English OK - Spec is legible. OK - Sources match upstream md5sum: 74780f7f296f1feac13f4358b97bd2f3 vdr-subtitles-0.4.0.tgz 74780f7f296f1feac13f4358b97bd2f3 vdr-subtitles-0.4.0.tgz.1 OK - BuildRequires correct OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. OK - Package has a correct %clean section. OK - Package has correct buildroot OK - Package is code or permissible content. OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime. OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch. OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files. OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. OK - Package owns all the directories it creates. OK - No rpmlint output. OK - final provides and requires are sane: SHOULD Items: OK - Should build in mock. x86_64/i386 - Should build on all supported archs OK - Should have dist tag OK - Should package latest version Issues: 1. The debian patch at: http://zap.tartarus.org/~ds/debian/dists/unstable/main/source/vdr-plugin-subtitles_0.3.11-1.ds.diff.gz is old. Looks like there is a 0.4.0 version there now. Perhaps updating to that will let you remove a sed in there for the version? I don't see any blockers however, so this package is APPROVED. Don't forget to close this NEXTRELEASE once it's been imported and built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 12 05:06:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2006 00:06:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214746] Review Request: eiciel - Graphical access control list (ACL) editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611120506.kAC56qYI018779@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eiciel - Graphical access control list (ACL) editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214746 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-11-12 00:06 EST ------- Imported and built for devel; branches requested for FC-5 and 6. Thanks for the review! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 12 05:11:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2006 00:11:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 190344] Review Request: vdr-osdteletext - OSD teletext plugin for VDR In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611120511.kAC5B1QF018875@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vdr-osdteletext - OSD teletext plugin for VDR https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190344 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |kevin at tummy.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-11-12 00:10 EST ------- I agree with the above comments that having a easy link to the .spec file is a good thing and helps reviewers. That said, here's a review of this package: OK - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines OK - Spec file matches base package name. OK - Spec has consistant macro usage. OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines. OK - License (GPL) OK - License field in spec matches OK - License file included in package OK - Spec in American English OK - Spec is legible. OK - Sources match upstream md5sum: 52c219e38a089504071237209ad114cd vdr-osdteletext-0.5.1.tgz 52c219e38a089504071237209ad114cd vdr-osdteletext-0.5.1.tgz.1 OK - BuildRequires correct OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. OK - Package has a correct %clean section. OK - Package has correct buildroot OK - Package is code or permissible content. OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime. OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch. OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files. OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. OK - Package owns all the directories it creates. See below - No rpmlint output. OK - final provides and requires are sane: SHOULD Items: OK - Should build in mock. x86_64/i386 - Should build on all supported archs OK - Should have dist tag OK - Should package latest version Issues: 1. rpmlint says: E: vdr-osdteletext non-standard-uid /var/cache/vdr/osdteletext vdr W: vdr-osdteletext dangerous-command-in-%preun rm Can both be ignored. Would be nice to get rid of the rm, but it looks to be the same perl-Template issue that vdr had, so there isn't a way around it. ;( I don't see any blockers, so this package is APPROVED. Don't forget to close this bug NEXTRELEASE once it's been imported and built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 12 05:16:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2006 00:16:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 191968] Review Request: phpBB - A php Bulletin Board In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611120516.kAC5GCNO019001@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: phpBB - A php Bulletin Board https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191968 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |201449 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 12 05:30:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2006 00:30:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 211214] Review Request: mod_revocator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611120530.kAC5URho019309@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mod_revocator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211214 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |kevin at tummy.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-11-12 00:30 EST ------- Here's a review: OK - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines OK - Spec file matches base package name. OK - Spec has consistant macro usage. OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines. OK - License (Apache) OK - License field in spec matches OK - License file included in package OK - Spec in American English OK - Spec is legible. See below - Sources match upstream md5sum: OK - BuildRequires correct OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. OK - Package has a correct %clean section. OK - Package has correct buildroot OK - Package is code or permissible content. OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime. OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch. OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files. OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. OK - Package owns all the directories it creates. See below - No rpmlint output. OK - final provides and requires are sane: SHOULD Items: OK - Should build in mock. x86_64/i386 - Should build on all supported archs OK - Should have dist tag OK - Should package latest version Issues: 1. The Source url doesn't seem to be working... I get a 404 from it. 2. rpmlint says: W: mod_revocator devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/librevocation.so This can be ignored if httpd is loading it directly as you mention... 3. If the /usr/lib/librevocation.so file is directly loaded by httpd, are the ldconfig calls even needed in post/postun? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 12 06:13:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2006 01:13:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 207472] Review Request: ruby-activesupport - Utility classes and extension to Ruby's standard library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611120613.kAC6De8o021365@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-activesupport - Utility classes and extension to Ruby's standard library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207472 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-11-12 01:13 EST ------- Sorry for taking so long to get back; I'm just getting back up to speed. I admit to not understanding fully why rpmlint complains so stridently about files with shebang lines that aren't executable. I can understanding a warning so that you double check that you haven't installed a script and forgotten to make it executable, but these aren't supposed to be executable, and patching them out just seems like needless specfile complexity and diversion from upstream for absolutely no gain. In the past such things have been fixed up by the packager, but I've never felt good about that and frankly I'm ready to stop asking folks to change it. I don't think it's ever been considered an absolute blocker in any case. The changes yoou made look good to me, and the package builds fine. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 12 06:14:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2006 01:14:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 207473] Review Request: ruby-activerecord - Implements the ActiveRecord pattern for ORM In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611120614.kAC6EErK021424@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-activerecord - Implements the ActiveRecord pattern for ORM https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207473 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 12 06:14:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2006 01:14:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 207473] Review Request: ruby-activerecord - Implements the ActiveRecord pattern for ORM In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611120614.kAC6EE4H021432@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-activerecord - Implements the ActiveRecord pattern for ORM https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207473 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 12 06:22:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2006 01:22:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 197754] Review Request: perl-Perl6-Bible In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611120622.kAC6MbIN021774@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Perl6-Bible https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197754 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |tibbs at math.uh.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-11-12 01:22 EST ------- This all looks good; can you cut a new package with that information included (as a README.licensing file or something) and I'll do a quick review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 12 07:39:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2006 02:39:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215193] New: Review Request: VLGothic - Truetype Japanese gothic fonts Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215193 Summary: Review Request: VLGothic - Truetype Japanese gothic fonts Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: ryo-dairiki at users.sourceforge.net QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://homepage2.nifty.com/shibatama/garage/VLGothic.spec SRPM URL: http://homepage2.nifty.com/shibatama/garage/VLGothic-20061026-1.noarch.src.rpm Description: VLGothic is a Japanese TrueType font maden by Vine Linux project. The most of grphys are imported from M+ fonts and sazanami mincho, and later patched by them. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 12 08:44:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2006 03:44:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 212909] Review Request: php-pear-HTML-Common - Base class for other HTML classes In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611120844.kAC8iMI6025757@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-HTML-Common - Base class for other HTML classes Alias: pear-HTML-Common https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212909 ------- Additional Comments From Fedora at FamilleCollet.com 2006-11-12 03:44 EST ------- No test suite, but ones provide by others extensions (HTML_Table and HTML_Quickform) use this one and works well. == REVIEW == * source files match upstream: 3598dd20e3be90ae445501e9c2d59506 HTML_Common-1.2.3.tgz * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * dist tag is present. * build root is correct. * license field matches the actual license (PHP) * license is open source-compatible. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development). * package installs properly * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: php-pear(HTML_Common) = 1.2.3 php-pear-HTML-Common = 1.2.3-2.fc7 * %check is not present * owns the directories it creates * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * scriptlets are OK (pear install) * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 12 08:44:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2006 03:44:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 212909] Review Request: php-pear-HTML-Common - Base class for other HTML classes In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611120844.kAC8ipKK025784@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-HTML-Common - Base class for other HTML classes Alias: pear-HTML-Common https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212909 Fedora at FamilleCollet.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 12 08:55:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2006 03:55:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 212915] Review Request: php-pear-HTML-Table - Class to easily design HTML tables In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611120855.kAC8t42P026709@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-HTML-Table - Class to easily design HTML tables Alias: pear-HTML-Table https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212915 ------- Additional Comments From Fedora at FamilleCollet.com 2006-11-12 03:55 EST ------- == TEST == pear run-tests -p HTML_Table > Running 31 tests > 31 PASSED TESTS == REVIEW == * source files match upstream: d76f133550d326c33f7fc556afb59555 HTML_Table-1.7.5.tgz * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * dist tag is present. * build root is correct. * license field matches the actual license (BSD) * license is open source-compatible. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development). * package installs properly * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: php-pear(HTML_Table) = 1.7.5 php-pear-HTML-Table = 1.7.5-1.fc7 * %check is not present; see comment * owns the directories it creates (HTML own by HTML_Common which is required) * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * scriptlets are OK (pear install) * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 12 08:55:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2006 03:55:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 212915] Review Request: php-pear-HTML-Table - Class to easily design HTML tables In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611120855.kAC8tv8d026804@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-HTML-Table - Class to easily design HTML tables Alias: pear-HTML-Table https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212915 Fedora at FamilleCollet.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 12 09:04:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2006 04:04:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215193] Review Request: VLGothic - Truetype Japanese gothic fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611120904.kAC94JLm027985@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: VLGothic - Truetype Japanese gothic fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215193 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 12 09:14:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2006 04:14:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215193] Review Request: VLGothic - Truetype Japanese gothic fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611120914.kAC9E9tA028839@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: VLGothic - Truetype Japanese gothic fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215193 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2006-11-12 04:14 EST ------- I think it would be a good idea to have "fonts" or "font" somewhere in the package name - see existing font packages in Fedora for examples. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 12 09:17:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2006 04:17:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 212912] Review Request: php-pear-HTML-QuickForm - Class for creating, validating, processing HTML forms In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611120917.kAC9HkFX029039@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-HTML-QuickForm - Class for creating, validating, processing HTML forms Alias: pear-HTML-QuickForm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212912 ------- Additional Comments From Fedora at FamilleCollet.com 2006-11-12 04:17 EST ------- == TEST == No test suite provided. Samples works well. == REVIEW == * source files match upstream: 7d3cbe961e17996641abec79c953e3dd HTML_QuickForm-3.2.7.tgz * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * dist tag is present. * build root is correct. * license field matches the actual license (PHP) * license is open source-compatible. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development). * package installs properly * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: php-pear(Pager) = 2.4.2 php-pear-Pager = 2.4.2-1.fc6 * %check is not present; see comment * owns the directories it creates (HTML owned by HTML_Common which is required) * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * scriptlets are OK (pear install) * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. Should, as usualy : - bundle PHP Licence in %doc (perhaps change %{pear_name}-%{version}/docdir/%{pear_name}/docs/* to %{pear_name}-%{version}/docdir/%{pear_name}/docs is a good idea) - add versioned requires for php-pear(HTML_Common) >= 1.2.1 APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 12 09:19:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2006 04:19:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 212912] Review Request: php-pear-HTML-QuickForm - Class for creating, validating, processing HTML forms In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611120919.kAC9JGO6029137@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-HTML-QuickForm - Class for creating, validating, processing HTML forms Alias: pear-HTML-QuickForm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212912 Fedora at FamilleCollet.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 12 09:24:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2006 04:24:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 190344] Review Request: vdr-osdteletext - OSD teletext plugin for VDR In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611120924.kAC9OobX032603@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vdr-osdteletext - OSD teletext plugin for VDR https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190344 ville.skytta at iki.fi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2006-11-12 04:24 EST ------- Built for devel, owners list and comps updated, FC-5 and FC-6 branches requested. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 12 10:31:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2006 05:31:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215200] New: Review Request: php-pear-Services-Weather - This class acts as an interface to various online weather-services Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215200 Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Services-Weather - This class acts as an interface to various online weather-services Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: Fedora at FamilleCollet.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://remi.collet.free.fr/rpms/extras/php-pear-Services-Weather.spec SRPM URL: http://remi.collet.free.fr/rpms/extras/php-pear-Services-Weather-1.4.0-1.fc7.src.rpm Mock Log: http://remi.collet.free.fr/rpms/extras/php-pear-Services-Weather-build.log Description: Services_Weather searches for given locations and retrieves current weather data and, dependent on the used service, also forecasts. Up to now, GlobalWeather from CapeScience, Weather XML from EJSE (US only), a XOAP service from Weather.com and METAR/TAF from NOAA are supported. Further services will get included, if they become available, have a usable API and are properly documented. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 12 10:33:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2006 05:33:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214236] Review Request: php-pear-SOAP - Simple Object Access Protocol (SOAP) Client/Server for PHP In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611121033.kACAX5Qf017245@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-SOAP - Simple Object Access Protocol (SOAP) Client/Server for PHP Alias: php-pear-SOAP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214236 Fedora at FamilleCollet.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |215200 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 12 10:33:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2006 05:33:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215200] Review Request: php-pear-Services-Weather - This class acts as an interface to various online weather-services In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611121033.kACAX4oZ017237@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Services-Weather - This class acts as an interface to various online weather-services https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215200 Fedora at FamilleCollet.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |214236 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 12 12:29:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2006 07:29:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 198836] Review Request: freetype1 compatibility FreeType 1.x In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611121229.kACCTa7r021576@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: freetype1 compatibility FreeType 1.x https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198836 paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-11-12 07:29 EST ------- I can get on with it later today (just got to get the buildsys working again). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 12 13:11:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2006 08:11:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 190213] Review Request: gq - Graphical LDAP directory browser and editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611121311.kACDBjPr023365@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gq - Graphical LDAP directory browser and editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190213 Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net ------- Additional Comments From Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net 2006-11-12 08:11 EST ------- If Terje isn't interested anymore I would like to pick it up, since I have gq in ATrpms (I'd have to check the procedure in the wiki first). Terje, if you're still on it, please check the specfile at ATrpms for any possible merged specfile, thanks! BTW the gq homepage seems to be down currently, so an updated specfile (and even a review of the current tarball md5sums) is not easy to do. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 12 13:16:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2006 08:16:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215193] Review Request: VLGothic - Truetype Japanese gothic fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611121316.kACDGY5g023454@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: VLGothic - Truetype Japanese gothic fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215193 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-11-12 08:16 EST ------- Okay, first review of this package. A. From http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines : * Use rpmlint - rpmlint is not silent. ------------------------------------ W: VLGothic non-conffile-in-etc /etc/fonts/conf.d/30-VLGothic.conf ------------------------------------ Use %config(noreplace) unless you have a reason we should not use this. * Summary and desctiption - The groups of this package should be 'User Interface/X'. - I think that the URL of this package should be: 'http://dicey.org/vlgothic/' - Specify the URL or the location of the source. * Timestamps - Please use 'install -p' to keep timestamps. * Requires/File and Directory Ownership - This package does not own the following directory: A. /etc/fonts/ /etc/fonts/conf.d/ Please add the requirement for this directory like: Requires: /etc/fonts/ or require fontconfig. B. /usr/share/fonts/japanese/ /usr/share/fonts/japanese/TrueType When this package require fonts-japanese, please write so. Otherwise this package should own these directories. B. From http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines : = Nothing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 12 13:17:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2006 08:17:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215193] Review Request: VLGothic - Truetype Japanese gothic fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611121317.kACDH3Sj023477@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: VLGothic - Truetype Japanese gothic fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215193 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-11-12 08:17 EST ------- Oops.. C. Other things I have noticed: * Well, what do you think of the comment fro Ville? Z. Note: * License I read all the licenses included in this package and they meet the policy of Fedora assuming the licenses are all correct (I cannot check what license are really applied for each glyphs). * Would you explain why calling fc-cache is not required? When fc-cache is evoked automatically? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 12 13:52:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2006 08:52:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215169] Review Request: xfce4-dict-plugin - A XFCE panel plugin to query a Dict server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611121352.kACDquXR024737@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xfce4-dict-plugin - A XFCE panel plugin to query a Dict server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215169 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at christoph-wickert.de 2006-11-12 08:52 EST ------- Thanks for reviewing this so quickly. I was to tired yesterday to reply. (In reply to comment #1) > 1. Should add a: > %defattr(-,root,root,-) > to files? Of course. I have no idea how I managed to delete this line... > 2. Should the BuildRequire for xfce4-panel-devel 4.3.99.1 be 4.3.99.2, > since everything else is requiring that version? No, that's intentional, cause this is what ./configure checks for. > checking for libxfcegui4-1.0 >= 4.3.90.2... 4.3.99.1 > ... > checking for libxfce4util-1.0 >= 4.3.90.2... 4.3.99.1 > ... > checking for libxfce4panel-1.0 >= 4.3.99.1... 4.3.99.1 I usually make the BuildRequires: as low as possible (to make the packages easier to rebuild) but the Requires: to the version the plugin was compiled for. Updated Package: * Sun Nov 12 2006 Christoph Wickert - 0.2.0-2 - Add %%defattr (#215169). SPREC: http://home.arcor.de/christoph.wickert/fedora/extras/review/SPECS/xfce4-dict-plugin.spec SRPM: http://home.arcor.de/christoph.wickert/fedora/extras/review/SRPMS/xfce4-dict-plugin-0.2.0-2.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 12 14:18:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2006 09:18:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 190213] Review Request: gq - Graphical LDAP directory browser and editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611121418.kACEIpFb026363@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gq - Graphical LDAP directory browser and editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190213 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at christoph-wickert.de 2006-11-12 09:18 EST ------- (In reply to comment #12) > BTW the gq homepage seems to be down currently, so an updated specfile (and even > a review of the current tarball md5sums) is not easy to do. The files _should_ be available at http://dl.sf.net/sourceforge/gqclient/gq-1.2.1.tar.gz and http://dl.sf.net/sourceforge/gqclient/gq-1.2.1-langpack-1.tar.gz but I could not reach dl.sf.net ether and had to use a mirror. So, yes, we have no valid URL for the specfile ATM. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 12 14:25:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2006 09:25:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 210424] Review Request: fail2ban - scan log files and ban IPs with too many password failures In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611121425.kACEPveb026582@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fail2ban - scan log files and ban IPs with too many password failures https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210424 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-11-12 09:25 EST ------- Interestig package, however, I have to say that there are not a few issues to be fixed before accepting this package. Please read and be familliar with the following URL. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines Especially, please use 'rpmlint' (this is in Fedora Extras and Maintained by Ville Skytt?) to check if your package got shaped to Fedora Extras packaging criteria. For this package, you also have to read the following: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Python Not a full review, however: A. For srpm, rpmlint complains about the following. E: fail2ban no-changelogname-tag W: fail2ban strange-permission fail2ban.spec 0444 W: fail2ban hardcoded-packager-tag Walter W: fail2ban prereq-use /sbin/chkconfig /sbin/service * Add changelog * Change the permission of spec file to 0644. * Don't write 'Packager'. This should be written in Changelog. * Don't use Prereq. The correct usage of requirements are in http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets . Also: * Don't use hardcoded dist tag to release number. * pyo bytecompiled python binary are not ghosted any longer because of SELinux issue. * Use 'cp -p' or 'install -p' to keep timestamps. * BuildRoot is not the format recommended by Fedora Extras. B. For binary rpm, rpmlint complains as following. E: fail2ban no-changelogname-tag E: fail2ban only-non-binary-in-usr-lib W: fail2ban service-default-enabled /etc/rc.d/init.d/fail2ban E: fail2ban subsys-not-used /etc/rc.d/init.d/fail2ban * No binary files are installed in /usr/lib, which is generally regarded as wrong. Consider to move all the files in %{_libdir} to %{_datadir} NOTE: /usr/bin/fail2ban has a hardcoded directory setting of /usr/lib/fail2ban and your spec file says some files should be installed under %{_libdir}/%{name}. This is anyway incorrect because for x86_64 system, %{_libdir} is /usr/lib64. * This package enables fail2ban daemon when installed by default (see init script), which is usually unwilling. Check if this is the expected behavior (usually it is not). * fail2ban init script does not use subsys lock file (for this package, this is usually /var/lock/subsys/fail2ban). Rewrite the init script to use subsys file. (Usually this is done correctly by using 'daemon' function in /etc/rc.d/init.d/function. Init scripts in other rpms are good examples.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 12 15:10:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2006 10:10:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 212003] Review Request: mugshot - Companion software for mugshot.org In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611121510.kACFAS9w028057@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mugshot - Companion software for mugshot.org https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212003 ------- Additional Comments From otaylor at redhat.com 2006-11-12 10:10 EST ------- http://devel.mugshot.org/download/sources/fedora-core-6/mugshot-1.1.24-1.fc6.src.rpm Is the current SRPM, which includes the improvements from the spec file above. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 12 15:16:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2006 10:16:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215193] Review Request: VLGothic - Truetype Japanese gothic fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611121516.kACFGvOU028279@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: VLGothic - Truetype Japanese gothic fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215193 ------- Additional Comments From ryo-dairiki at users.sourceforge.net 2006-11-12 10:16 EST ------- > A. From http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines : > * Use rpmlint > - rpmlint is not silent. Strange. I've got no message from rpmlint. :( Anyway, I'll fix them. > C. Other things I have noticed: > * Well, what do you think of the comment fro Ville? I think it's right. I'll change the package name later. > Z. Note: > * Would you explain why calling fc-cache is not required? When > fc-cache is evoked automatically? Fontconfig will do it automatically when the fontlist is required. I've forgot the document from which I know this, but it seems it's right. Please uninstall VLGothic and fc-cache, then reinstal VLGothic without fc-caching. I bet you won't have any problem at all. :) Talking about xfs, it also rebuild the cache everytime it starts. So you can use VLGothic on xfs after restarting it. (Please read /etc/rd.d/init.d/xfs) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 12 15:26:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2006 10:26:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215193] Review Request: VLGothic - Truetype Japanese gothic fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611121526.kACFQLZL028669@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: VLGothic - Truetype Japanese gothic fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215193 ------- Additional Comments From ryo-dairiki at users.sourceforge.net 2006-11-12 10:26 EST ------- I've fixed these problems. You can get the new package from the follows: Spec URL: http://homepage2.nifty.com/shibatama/garage/VLGothic-fonts.spec SRPM URL: http://homepage2.nifty.com/shibatama/garage/VLGothic-fonts-20061026-2.noarch.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 12 15:31:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2006 10:31:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215193] Review Request: VLGothic-fonts - Truetype Japanese gothic fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611121531.kACFVSeq028857@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: VLGothic-fonts - Truetype Japanese gothic fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215193 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: VLGothic - |Review Request: VLGothic- |Truetype Japanese gothic |fonts - Truetype Japanese |fonts |gothic fonts -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 12 15:49:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2006 10:49:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215193] Review Request: VLGothic-fonts - Truetype Japanese gothic fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611121549.kACFnP6i029335@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: VLGothic-fonts - Truetype Japanese gothic fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215193 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-11-12 10:49 EST ------- Well, * /usr/share/fonts/japanese is owned only by fonts-japanese so this package should also own this directory. * Do you have some reason not to use noreplace option of config file, i.e. not to use -------------------------------------------- %config(noreplace) %{_sysconfdir}/fonts/conf.d/30-VLGothic.conf ? --------------------------------------------- rpmlint still complain about: -------------------------------------------- W: VLGothic-fonts conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/fonts/conf.d/30-VLGothic.conf -------------------------------------------- * For src.rpm: ------------------------------------ W: VLGothic-fonts unversioned-explicit-obsoletes VLGothic W: VLGothic-fonts unversioned-explicit-provides VLGothic ------------------------------------ Usually, obsoletes/provides are done like following: -------------------------------------- Obsoletes: VLGothic <= %{version}-%{release} Provides: VLGothic = %{version}-%{release} ---------------------------------------- * Cosmetic issue: %dir /usr/share/fonts/japanese/TrueType This should be %dir %{_datadir}/fonts/japanese/TrueType as you use %{_datadir} below. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 12 15:52:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2006 10:52:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214669] Review Request: logserial In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611121552.kACFqnEU029435@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: logserial https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214669 ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2006-11-12 10:52 EST ------- Thank you for the review. With respect to the first suggestion: I have written the developer and kindly asked him to include the proper license file in the next release. With the second one: done. On my test system the new src.rpm compiles sucessfully in mock. Please find the modified spec and src.rpm at http://wdl.lug.ro/linux/rpms/logserial/logserial.spec and http://wdl.lug.ro/linux/rpms/logserial/logserial-0.4.2-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 12 16:09:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2006 11:09:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 212003] Review Request: mugshot - Companion software for mugshot.org In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611121609.kACG97o5029791@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mugshot - Companion software for mugshot.org https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212003 green at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |green at redhat.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 12 16:23:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2006 11:23:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215224] New: Review Request: gtk-murrine-engine - Murrine GTK2 engine Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215224 Summary: Review Request: gtk-murrine-engine - Murrine GTK2 engine Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: sdl.web at gmail.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.srcf.ucam.org/~sl392/fedora/SRPMs/gtk-murrine-engine.spec SRPM URL: http://www.srcf.ucam.org/~sl392/fedora/SRPMs/gtk-murrine-engine-0.31-1.leofc5.src.rpm Description: Murrine is a cairo-based fast gtk2 theme engine. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 12 16:53:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2006 11:53:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 190345] Review Request: vdr-femon - DVB frontend status monitor plugin for VDR In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611121653.kACGrbWc030996@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vdr-femon - DVB frontend status monitor plugin for VDR https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190345 ville.skytta at iki.fi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |nobody at fedoraproject.org ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2006-11-12 11:53 EST ------- Updated URLs, no changes to package: http://cachalot.mine.nu/6/SRPMS/vdr-femon.spec http://cachalot.mine.nu/6/SRPMS/vdr-femon-1.1.0-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 12 18:17:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2006 13:17:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 193106] Review Request: gtkmozembedmm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611121817.kACIHqsA003475@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtkmozembedmm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193106 ------- Additional Comments From karlthered at gmail.com 2006-11-12 13:17 EST ------- - new spec http://darkenphoenix.free.fr/RPMS/RPMS/Extras/SPECS/gtkmozembedmm.spec - new srpm http://darkenphoenix.free.fr/RPMS/RPMS/Extras/SRPMS/gtkmozembedmm-1.4.2.cvs20060817-5.src.rpm I finally someone for testing the build on x86_64, it seems to build now. It still build under Mock. - rpmlint output $ rpmlint -i gtkmozembedmm-1.4.2.cvs20060817-5.fc7.i386.rpm $ rpmlint -i gtkmozembedmm-devel-1.4.2.cvs20060817-5.fc7.i386.rpm W: gtkmozembedmm-devel no-documentation The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include documentation files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 12 18:40:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2006 13:40:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214150] Review Request: flight-of-the-amazon-queen-cd - Flight of the Amazon Queen - Adventure Game - CD version In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611121840.kACIeQve004139@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: flight-of-the-amazon-queen-cd - Flight of the Amazon Queen - Adventure Game - CD version Alias: scumm-amazon-CD https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214150 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-11-12 13:40 EST ------- Thanks! Imported and build, closing. About the Provides shorthands, I understand the idea, but I concider this Provides / Requires namespace polution. Think what would happen if all packages would provide 2 or 3 names to make yum install easier -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 12 18:42:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2006 13:42:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 211433] Review Request: wdm - WINGs Display Manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611121842.kACIgWRl004188@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wdm - WINGs Display Manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211433 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-11-12 13:42 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > Humm... I'm not able to build in mock. I seem to be getting (for both fc6 and > devel): > > In file included from src/wdm/access.c:36: > ./include/dm.h:49:27: error: X11/Intrinsic.h: No such file or directory There is the error. I'll investigate a bit to understand whether it is really in wdm or in WindowMaker-devel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 12 18:51:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2006 13:51:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 193106] Review Request: gtkmozembedmm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611121851.kACIpDgh004419@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtkmozembedmm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193106 ------- Additional Comments From bugs.michael at gmx.net 2006-11-12 13:51 EST ------- You mix firefox-devel and gecko-devel in a questionable way. The first provides the latter. Please verify your BuildRequires. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 12 18:52:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2006 13:52:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 212704] Review Request: manedit - UNIX Manual Page Editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611121852.kACIqwBI004475@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: manedit - UNIX Manual Page Editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212704 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-11-12 13:52 EST ------- No problem with accepting, the utf8 support issue is clearly an upstream issue. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 12 19:17:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2006 14:17:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214312] Review Request: xdms - Extracts Amiga DMS archives In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611121917.kACJHgrF005188@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xdms - Extracts Amiga DMS archives https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214312 ------- Additional Comments From bugs.michael at gmx.net 2006-11-12 14:17 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=141003) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=141003&action=view) spec fixes * fix CFLAGS, don't hack VERSION! * use install option -p to preserve time-stamps of possibly _old_ files * don't use %{?dist} in %changelog, since it would alter history * don't package file COPYING, since it just points to xdms.txt * omit the man-pages .gz extension, prefer a wildcard -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 12 19:29:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2006 14:29:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 200700] Review Request: clipsmm - A C++ interface to the CLIPS library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611121929.kACJT8GY005694@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clipsmm - A C++ interface to the CLIPS library Alias: clipsmm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200700 ------- Additional Comments From rvinyard at cs.nmsu.edu 2006-11-12 14:29 EST ------- Spec URL: http://miskatonic.cs.nmsu.edu/pub/clipsmm.spec SRPM URL: http://miskatonic.cs.nmsu.edu/pub/clipsmm-0.0.7-1.src.rpm I still haven't finished the new 0.1.0 release (probably December or so for it), so I went ahead and made an 0.0.7 release that cleans up some stuff... mainly the smart pointers. As for the spec, no changes except the new release updates. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 12 19:50:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2006 14:50:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214150] Review Request: flight-of-the-amazon-queen-cd - Flight of the Amazon Queen - Adventure Game - CD version In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611121950.kACJoiCh006305@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: flight-of-the-amazon-queen-cd - Flight of the Amazon Queen - Adventure Game - CD version Alias: scumm-amazon-CD https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214150 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 12 19:50:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2006 14:50:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215241] New: Review Request: thunar-archive-plugin - Archive plugin for the Thunar file manager Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215241 Summary: Review Request: thunar-archive-plugin - Archive plugin for the Thunar file manager Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fedora at christoph-wickert.de QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://home.arcor.de/christoph.wickert/fedora/extras/review/SPECS/thunar-archive-plugin.spec SRPM URL: http://home.arcor.de/christoph.wickert/fedora/extras/review/SRPMS/thunar-archive-plugin-0.2.2-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: The Thunar Archive Plugin allows you to create and extract archive files using the file context menus in the Thunar file manager. Starting with version 0.2.0, the plugin provides a generic scripting interface for archive managers and File Roller is no longer hardcoded. Note: xarchiver (bug #198098) is also supported, ark is not working ATM. This is because the mimetypes are not registered correctly by kdeutils. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 12 19:52:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2006 14:52:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 208737] Review Request: ivman - Generic handler for HAL events In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611121952.kACJqkuP006473@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ivman - Generic handler for HAL events https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208737 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-11-12 14:52 EST ------- Not yet. I'll reask some time in the future... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 12 19:54:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2006 14:54:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215241] Review Request: thunar-archive-plugin - Archive plugin for the Thunar file manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611121954.kACJsCOD006534@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: thunar-archive-plugin - Archive plugin for the Thunar file manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215241 fedora at christoph-wickert.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |214032 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 12 20:05:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2006 15:05:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 188400] Review Request: ssmtp In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611122005.kACK5X28006991@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ssmtp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188400 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-11-12 15:05 EST ------- (In reply to comment #33) > Given the above, could you please let me know what modifications are still > needed,in order to get in shape for inclusion in FE ? none, it is APPROVED. Look like those patches are not needed on FE, if you really want an advice on a specific issue, ask, otherwise I trust your choices. Sorry, I completely forgot to respond here :/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 12 20:20:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2006 15:20:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 200139] Review Request: luma - A graphical tool for managing LDAP servers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611122020.kACKKFt6007461@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: luma - A graphical tool for managing LDAP servers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200139 Jochen at herr-schmitt.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 12 20:25:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2006 15:25:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 198098] Review Request: xarchiver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611122025.kACKP1LV007618@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xarchiver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198098 fedora at christoph-wickert.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kevin at tummy.com OtherBugsDependingO| |215241 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From fedora at christoph-wickert.de 2006-11-12 15:24 EST ------- I'd like to take over this package, since there has benn no feedback from Damien for more then 4 months now and I really would like to see this package in Extras soon. Could someone please review these files? http://home.arcor.de/christoph.wickert/fedora/extras/review/SPECS/xarchiver.spec http://home.arcor.de/christoph.wickert/fedora/extras/review/SRPMS/xarchiver-0.4.2-0.1.rc2.fc7.src.rpm I have packaged xarchiver for a while now (I had not seen this review), but my package looks quite different. I have split the package into xarchiver and xarchiver-thunar-archive-plugin. The latter contains only one file /usr/libexec/fedora-xarchiver.tap, a wrapper script for thunar-archive-plugin (see bug #215241). I don't want xarchiver depend on Thunar. Maybe it's easier to drop the sub-package, but then we'll have to include fedora-xarchiver.tap in thunar-archive-plugin. Simply leaving it in the xarchiver main package (without a dependency on the archive plugin) would lead to an unowned /usr/libexec/thunar-archive-plugin/ if thunar(-archive-plugin) is not installed. If the archive plugin is installed, this dir would be owned by two packages. Bad Idea. Opinions? Drop the sub-package and move the file over to thunar-archive-plugin? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 12 20:25:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2006 15:25:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215241] Review Request: thunar-archive-plugin - Archive plugin for the Thunar file manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611122025.kACKPDAc007655@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: thunar-archive-plugin - Archive plugin for the Thunar file manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215241 fedora at christoph-wickert.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |198098 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 12 20:26:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2006 15:26:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215241] Review Request: thunar-archive-plugin - Archive plugin for the Thunar file manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611122026.kACKQMJw007760@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: thunar-archive-plugin - Archive plugin for the Thunar file manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215241 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-11-12 15:26 EST ------- It seems to me that 'and File Roller is no longer hardcoded.' could be removed from %description. It doesn't really work for me. Icons have appeared, but 'extract to...' fails with a pop-up window Failed to extract files. No suitable archive manager found. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 12 20:40:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2006 15:40:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215241] Review Request: thunar-archive-plugin - Archive plugin for the Thunar file manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611122040.kACKeJFh008225@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: thunar-archive-plugin - Archive plugin for the Thunar file manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215241 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at christoph-wickert.de 2006-11-12 15:40 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > It seems to me that 'and File Roller is no longer hardcoded.' could > be removed from %description. ok. > It doesn't really work for me. Icons have appeared, but 'extract to...' > fails with a pop-up window > Failed to extract files. > No suitable archive manager found. Works fine here with file-manager and xarchiver (if installed). I can even select which one to use. Please give me ls -l /usr/libexec/thunar-archive-plugin/ and ls -l /usr/share/applications/gnome-file-roller* The name of the desktop-file in /usr/share/applications has to match the file in /usr/libexec/thunar-archive-plugin, this is why i have renamed file-roller.tap to gnome-file-roller.tap. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 12 20:46:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2006 15:46:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215241] Review Request: thunar-archive-plugin - Archive plugin for the Thunar file manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611122046.kACKkknS008380@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: thunar-archive-plugin - Archive plugin for the Thunar file manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215241 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at christoph-wickert.de 2006-11-12 15:46 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > Works fine here with file-manager of course i meant file-roller. Another thing I forgot to mention: the mime type has tp be registered to file-roller, this is why ark is not working ATM. Does file-roller show up in the menu when you right click on an archive in Thunar or nautilus? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 12 20:58:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2006 15:58:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 193106] Review Request: gtkmozembedmm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611122058.kACKwppN008628@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtkmozembedmm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193106 ------- Additional Comments From karlthered at gmail.com 2006-11-12 15:58 EST ------- I had uploaded the wrong src.rpm (and the same for the spec), they have been re-uploaded (same links as above) For BR, it will depend on mozilla-devel for FC5 and gecko-devel for FC6+, no more firefox-devel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 12 21:08:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2006 16:08:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 211214] Review Request: mod_revocator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611122108.kACL8i8c008912@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mod_revocator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211214 ------- Additional Comments From rcritten at redhat.com 2006-11-12 16:08 EST ------- Source URL fixed. /usr/lib/librevocation.so.0 is linked to the binary ldapget which is why ldconfig is run. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 12 21:21:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2006 16:21:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215241] Review Request: thunar-archive-plugin - Archive plugin for the Thunar file manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611122121.kACLLuHZ009370@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: thunar-archive-plugin - Archive plugin for the Thunar file manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215241 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-11-12 16:21 EST ------- I don't have file-roller installed. Maybe a Requires missing? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 12 21:28:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2006 16:28:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215241] Review Request: thunar-archive-plugin - Archive plugin for the Thunar file manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611122128.kACLSdFE009630@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: thunar-archive-plugin - Archive plugin for the Thunar file manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215241 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-11-12 16:28 EST ------- In fact the default Requires should certainly be xarchiver, it is more xfce-like. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 12 21:33:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2006 16:33:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 211433] Review Request: wdm - WINGs Display Manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611122133.kACLXcUg009799@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wdm - WINGs Display Manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211433 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-11-12 16:33 EST ------- Ok, builds in mock now - add BR libXt-devel and libXmu-devel Available now here: http://www.lmd.jussieu.fr/~pdlmd/wdm.spec http://www.lmd.jussieu.fr/~pdlmd/wdm-1.28-4.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 12 21:38:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2006 16:38:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215241] Review Request: thunar-archive-plugin - Archive plugin for the Thunar file manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611122138.kACLc6NA009995@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: thunar-archive-plugin - Archive plugin for the Thunar file manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215241 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at christoph-wickert.de 2006-11-12 16:38 EST ------- This is another case of require foo or bar... ATM you need ether file-roller or xarchiver (or you can use both) but I don't want to force people to install file-roller. xarchiver would be ok for me, but I don't really like it. One can easily add his own program to the plugin, a wrapper template is included in the docs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 12 21:50:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2006 16:50:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215241] Review Request: thunar-archive-plugin - Archive plugin for the Thunar file manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611122150.kACLod2E010311@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: thunar-archive-plugin - Archive plugin for the Thunar file manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215241 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-11-12 16:50 EST ------- (In reply to comment #6) > This is another case of require foo or bar... > > ATM you need ether file-roller or xarchiver (or you can use both) but I don't > want to force people to install file-roller. xarchiver would be ok for me, but I > don't really like it. One can easily add his own program to the plugin, a > wrapper template is included in the docs. This is something for end-users, we shouldn't force them to do anything to have it working. In my opinion using xarchiver should be the best. A virtual provides would be the cleanest, but I don't think it is really necessary in that case since there is an xfce-like application. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 12 22:00:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2006 17:00:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 190213] Review Request: gq - Graphical LDAP directory browser and editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611122200.kACM0V55010625@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gq - Graphical LDAP directory browser and editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190213 ------- Additional Comments From terjeros at phys.ntnu.no 2006-11-12 17:00 EST ------- Updated to gq-1.2.1, I did this some time ago, but something is this version broke the install of po files. I was waiting for upstream do a new release. Anyway, new version with some improvements is available here: SPEC: http://www.pvv.ntnu.no/~terjeros/rpms/gq/gq.spec SRPMS: http://www.pvv.ntnu.no/~terjeros/rpms/gq/gq-1.2.1-2.fc6.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 12 22:01:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2006 17:01:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215241] Review Request: thunar-archive-plugin - Archive plugin for the Thunar file manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611122201.kACM1rig010686@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: thunar-archive-plugin - Archive plugin for the Thunar file manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215241 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at christoph-wickert.de 2006-11-12 17:01 EST ------- Ok, I will update the package, wait a moment. The changes so far are: - Require xarchiver. - Shorten %description. (comment #1) - Fix Source0 URL. - Use thunarver macro. - Include template.tap to %%doc. (the one from comment #6) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 12 22:06:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2006 17:06:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 184011] Review Request: nickle In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611122206.kACM6BCn010886@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nickle https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=184011 gemi at bluewin.ch changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From gemi at bluewin.ch 2006-11-12 17:06 EST ------- * source files match upstream: ffc7b03a830e64ec0547777330ae00b8 nickle-2.54.tar.gz * package meets naming and packaging guidelines * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently * dist tag is present * build root is correct * license field matches the actual license * license is open source-compatible, license text included in package * latest version is being packaged * BuildRequires are proper * compiler flags are appropriate * %clean is present * package builds in mock (FC-6, i386) * package installs properly * rpmlint is silent (no doc for -devel package, which is ok) * final provides and requires are sane * no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths * owns the directories it creates * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't * no duplicates in %files * file permissions are appropriate * no scriptlets present * code, not content * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package * header files in -devel package * no pkgconfig files * no libtool .la droppings APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 12 22:09:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2006 17:09:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 211763] Review Request: jikes - Java source to bytecode compiler In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611122209.kACM9Qjv011069@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jikes - Java source to bytecode compiler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211763 ------- Additional Comments From gemi at bluewin.ch 2006-11-12 17:09 EST ------- Paul, would you submit the original src rpm? I will look it over quickly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 12 22:30:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2006 17:30:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213511] Review Request: gxine - Gnome frontend for the xine multimedia library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611122230.kACMUst2011689@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gxine - Gnome frontend for the xine multimedia library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213511 ------- Additional Comments From martin.sourada at seznam.cz 2006-11-12 17:30 EST ------- Hi, about a week ago I also made a package for gxine and now I go through this thread... I want to help you if I could with your package, so I took a rough look and I saw some differences between our packages. The most notable is that I include gxine browser plug-in (though I have there an error - subpackage gxine-mozplugin should have Group: Applications/Multimedia instead of Group: Video). There is also a little difference between our BR sections (I looked for BR in configure.in)... Also I use %find_lang (combined with echo and cat you can handle it) and update desktop database in %post and %postun sections. I saw that you don't handle the desktop file at all. The rest of your package is handled better than mine I think. Well, one another thought, I don't know if it is needed, but I think you should remove non-free mime types (like audio/x-mp3). My source package (gziped) is here: http://forums.fedoraforum.org/forum/attachment.php?attachmentid=10272 My second though for your package review is possible bug in gxine. It crashes to me randomly (when starting to play a video; using my package, yours I did not tried yet). Terminal output is this: CDROMREADTOCHDR: Chyba vstupu/v?stupu WARN: error in ioctl CDROMREADTOCHDR: Chyba vstupu/v?stupu WARN: error reading PVD sector (16) error -1 CDROMREADTOCHDR: Input/Output error WARN: error in ioctl CDROMREADTOCHDR: Chyba vstupu/v?stupu WARN: error reading PVD sector (16) error -1 Unauthorized access to memory (SIGSEGV) I should say that I have livna's xine-lib-extras-nonfree installed and I, at first, thought that it might be caused by wrongly implemented non-free codec, but in kaffeine (too using xine-lib) all is fine. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 12 22:36:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2006 17:36:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213511] Review Request: gxine - Gnome frontend for the xine multimedia library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611122236.kACMaWen011864@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gxine - Gnome frontend for the xine multimedia library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213511 martin.sourada at seznam.cz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |martin.sourada at seznam.cz ------- Additional Comments From martin.sourada at seznam.cz 2006-11-12 17:36 EST ------- Well, I see I did not translated whole output. Where is 'Chyba vstupu/v?stupu' you should have 'Intput/Output error'. So the WHOLLY translated output should look like this: CDROMREADTOCHDR: Input/Output error WARN: error in ioctl CDROMREADTOCHDR: Input/Output error WARN: error reading PVD sector (16) error -1 CDROMREADTOCHDR: Input/Output error WARN: error in ioctl CDROMREADTOCHDR: Input/Output error WARN: error reading PVD sector (16) error -1 Unauthorized access to memory (SIGSEGV) Sorry for that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 12 22:55:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2006 17:55:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215241] Review Request: thunar-archive-plugin - Archive plugin for the Thunar file manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611122255.kACMtBwB012418@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: thunar-archive-plugin - Archive plugin for the Thunar file manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215241 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at christoph-wickert.de 2006-11-12 17:55 EST ------- Here are the updated files: SPEC: http://home.arcor.de/christoph.wickert/fedora/extras/review/SPECS/thunar-archive-plugin.spec SRPM: http://home.arcor.de/christoph.wickert/fedora/extras/review/SRPMS/thunar-archive-plugin-0.2.2-2.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 12 22:55:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2006 17:55:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 177747] Review Request: glade3 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611122255.kACMtaN9012442@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glade3 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177747 ------- Additional Comments From martin.sourada at seznam.cz 2006-11-12 17:55 EST ------- I think you should split up the package. I see there three (or two depends on point of view) independent parts: glade3, libgladeui and libgladeui-devel. I have one good reason for such division - for anjuta2 glade3 plug-in you need only libgladeui(-devel), not whole glade3. I think that glade3 is front-end for libgladeui, from a development point of view. You can compare my package with yours; the specfile is here: http://forums.fedoraforum.org/forum/attachment.php?attachmentid=10171 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 12 22:59:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2006 17:59:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 211763] Review Request: jikes - Java source to bytecode compiler In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611122259.kACMxhVO012559@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jikes - Java source to bytecode compiler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211763 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-11-12 17:59 EST ------- Do you mean the version that is in CVS or the one you can find at http://nodoid.homelinux.org/fedora/srpms.shtml ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 12 23:37:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2006 18:37:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 188400] Review Request: ssmtp In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611122337.kACNbYZE013594@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ssmtp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188400 ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2006-11-12 18:37 EST ------- Thank you, Patrice. Succesfully built the devel branch, submitted branch requests for FC5 and FC6. Will close this bug as soon as those branches are built, too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 12 23:38:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2006 18:38:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215256] New: Review Request: firefox-32 - Alternate Launcher for 32bit Firefox Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215256 Summary: Review Request: firefox-32 - Alternate Launcher for 32bit Firefox Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: wtogami at redhat.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com http://togami.com/~warren/fedora/firefox-32-0.0.1-1.src.rpm http://togami.com/~warren/fedora/firefox-32.spec Description: Alternate Launcher for 32bit Firefox on Multilib Systems If you have both 32bit /usr/lib and 64bit /usr/lib64 Firefox installed, the standard /usr/bin/firefox launcher will run only the 64bit version. This launcher allows you to choose to run the 32bit browser by running /usr/bin/firefox-32. Please be sure that all Firefox instances are closed before running this launcher. Warren Togami thinks the necessity of this package is sad, given that a tiny change to the standard /usr/bin/firefox script could obviate the need for this package to exist. POSSIBLE IMPROVEMENTS: 1) It could be made prettier with a custom icon. 2) Better name? I dunno. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 13 00:05:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2006 19:05:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215256] Review Request: firefox-32 - Alternate Launcher for 32bit Firefox In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611130005.kAD05AMR014592@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: firefox-32 - Alternate Launcher for 32bit Firefox https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215256 peter at thecodergeek.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |peter at thecodergeek.com ------- Additional Comments From peter at thecodergeek.com 2006-11-12 19:05 EST ------- (In reply to comment #0) > Warren Togami thinks the necessity of this package is sad, given that a tiny change to the standard /usr/bin/firefox script could obviate the need for this package to exist. Perhaps I'm misunderstanding the situtation; but if that's the case, why not file a bug against Firefox so that this is added? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 13 00:42:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2006 19:42:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215258] New: Review Request: clucene - A C++ port of Lucene Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215258 Summary: Review Request: clucene - A C++ port of Lucene Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: dakingun at gmail.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: ftp://czar.eas.yorku.ca/pub/clucene/clucene.spec SRPM URL: ftp://czar.eas.yorku.ca/pub/clucene/clucene-0.9.15-1.src.rpm Description: CLucene is a C++ port of Lucene. It is a high-performance, full-featured text search engine written in C++. CLucene is faster than lucene as it is written in C++ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 13 01:38:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2006 20:38:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 211626] Review Request: xtide - Calculate tide all over the world In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611130138.kAD1cI2Z016906@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xtide - Calculate tide all over the world https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211626 dave at flaterco.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dave at flaterco.com ------- Additional Comments From dave at flaterco.com 2006-11-12 20:38 EST ------- Upstream here. I was AFK for two weeks. In a message dated 2006-11-02 19:47+0900, Mamoru Tasaka wrote: > A. > Well, currently libtcd library are packaged in XTide tarball and > only static archive are provided. libtcd is used not only for XTide, > but also some utilities in tcd-utils and others, so I think > providing libtcd seperately is a good idea. The reason things are packaged the way they are is that 99% of users are only interested in running XTide to get tide predictions. They have no interest in nor any need for an ability to generate or edit the tide data, and anything I do to make that possible for them just adds complexity, hurts performance, and makes them yell at me. I have been there and done that, and it was a mistake. tcd-utils is for the other 1% who actually do know enough to edit tide data in a meaningful way and have reason to do it. It was never cleaned up for the 99% market. The people who use it (counted on one hand) have never complained about having to compile it from ugly source snapshots. The inclusion of tcd-utils in Fedora was perhaps motivated by some policy that discouraged shipping binary files? For the legacy harmonics data (still distributed by Bob Kenney, but not maintained), the TCD was in fact built from text and XML source, so building a TCD using tcd-utils might have made sense. But that is all ancient history. harmonics-dwf now starts with scraping web pages from the NOAA web site using software that has to be updated every year as their web site changes, then these are processed into an SQL database where they merge with other countries' data, then manual fixes are made as needed to correct upstream errors, then eventually the whole mess is exported directly to TCD. The closest you could get to what you want is to start with the SQL dump, but then you would need to have PostgreSql running, and harmbase2, and ... just don't go there. 99% of users will not benefit from this approach. They just want the tide prediction part of the program to install easily and run easily. I don't advise use of the legacy data. harmonics-dwf from http://www.flaterco.com/xtide/files.html is maintained by me. The legalese for harmonics-dwf is at http://www.flaterco.com/xtide/harmonics_boilerplate.txt. See http://www.flaterco.com/xtide/faq.html#60 for background on why there is so much of it. > A-1: How do you think of providing libtcd shared dynamic library seperately? This makes sense if you really do want to deliver tideEditor or other extras in Fedora. But do you *really* want to do that? > A-2: If you agree with provide libtcd.so, how should we determine soname? Deferred pending answers to previous. > A-3: Related to A-2, should we provide libtcd.so (if you agree) with COMPAT114 > defined or undefined? (Note: tcd-utils 2005-08-11 can _NOT_ be compiled > with COMPAT114 _defined_). Do not define COMPAT114. AFAIK only the Naval Oceanographic Office ever used this, and they might not even still use it. > A-4: Do you have any plan to provide seperate libtcd tarball? Deferred pending answers to previous. Separate maintenance of libtcd would help me in case libtcd needs maintenance when XTide doesn't, but for the 99% of users it would be an annoyance to have to do two installs instead of just one. FYI, the libtcd bundled in XTide 2.9 DEVELOPMENT incorporates bug fixes that are important ONLY to tideEditor, but for tideEditor they are serious. If Fedora wants to ship tideEditor as part of its distribution, then we (including me) need to do whatever is necessary to enable tideEditor to be linked with the newest libtcd, rather than the one that is bundled with the stable XTide 2.8.3. > B. > Another issue of packaging are tideEditor issue. The reviewers of XTide says > that tideEditor should belong to XTide package as: > * the other binaries in tcd-utils (build_tide_db and restore_tide_db) are only > command line conversion tools and have less dependency. > * on the other hand XTide, tideEditor is a graphical viewer (tideEditor is also > a viewer) and have a lot of dependency (especially tideEditor depends on Qt). > > So, > B-1: how do you think of moving tideEditor to XTide tarball? It would make sense if it were used by more than 1% of users. But I don't think that it is, or would be, even if it were installed for them automagically. It is only potentially useful if an end user manages to find some tide data that they want to add, and then only if they know what they are doing. This happy coincidence just doesn't happen as often as you would hope. FYI, I am currently in the midst of a 100% code review and cleanup for XTide. This is a good time to incorporate changes to make life easier for Fedora, but not a good time to assume that the latest snapshot is stable. Patrice Dumas wrote: > I guess that a full security audit of xttpd would be nice, however > it would go beyond a review. I will cooperate with a security audit of xttpd and implement any mitigations that are indicated, but if it does show any problems that are hard to address it might be better to retire it. I constructed xttpd as a proof-of-concept that you could put an HTTP interface on XTide, hoping that web developers would pick up the ball and run with it. They didn't. They preferred to stick with CGI, or nowadays with PHP. Other FYIs: With respect to patching configure to do CFLAGS etc. as expected, I have a guy who is supposedly reorganizing the whole thing according to current best practices and making it NetBSD-friendly. Haven't heard from him in a month or so, but I can put you in touch to coordinate changes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 13 01:48:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2006 20:48:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215169] Review Request: xfce4-dict-plugin - A XFCE panel plugin to query a Dict server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611130148.kAD1mr94017320@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xfce4-dict-plugin - A XFCE panel plugin to query a Dict server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215169 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-11-12 20:48 EST ------- ok. Looks good to me.The blockers look all solved... this package is APPROVED. Don't forget to close this package NEXTRELEASE once it's been imported and built. Also, consider doing a review of a waiting package to help spread out the reviewing load. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 13 02:01:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2006 21:01:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214669] Review Request: logserial In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611130201.kAD21Unp017676@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: logserial https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214669 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-11-12 21:01 EST ------- ok. Issue 1 isn't a blocker, just nice to have. Humm...on issue #2, I am not seeing the rpm opt flags being used... In my build.log I see: + make -j2 gcc -Wall -D_POSIX -D_SYSV -D_SELECT -D_HAVE_MACROS -c -o logserial.o logserial.c ... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 13 02:19:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2006 21:19:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215169] Review Request: xfce4-dict-plugin - A XFCE panel plugin to query a Dict server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611130219.kAD2JpbR017999@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xfce4-dict-plugin - A XFCE panel plugin to query a Dict server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215169 fedora at christoph-wickert.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From fedora at christoph-wickert.de 2006-11-12 21:19 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > Also, consider doing a review of a waiting package to help spread out the > reviewing load. I have allready assigned bug #190213 and bug #188542 to me. Will see what I can do after that. Imported and built for devel, cvs-sync for FE6 is requested. Closing -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 13 02:30:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2006 21:30:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 193106] Review Request: gtkmozembedmm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611130230.kAD2UejP018225@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtkmozembedmm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193106 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-11-12 21:30 EST ------- The BR's look ok to me with the re-uploaded version... Is the Requires correct though? Requires: gecko-libs = 1.5.0.8 Why hardcoding the version there? This causes it to break on devel, since devel has firefox 2.0 in it, which doesn't provide that version of gecko-libs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 13 02:38:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2006 21:38:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 200700] Review Request: clipsmm - A C++ interface to the CLIPS library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611130238.kAD2cufZ018407@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clipsmm - A C++ interface to the CLIPS library Alias: clipsmm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200700 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-11-12 21:38 EST ------- Odd. The md5sum still doesn't match... could be something in the way you make your src.rpm? Or some problem with sourceforge? 9ec1cf1e393c2a8637a13a3e4bec55b7 clipsmm-0.0.7.tar.bz2 462cad31023799926ab67f78b628e719 clipsmm-0.0.7.tar.bz2.1 The size is different as well: -rw-r--r-- 1 kevin mock 446966 Nov 12 19:25 clipsmm-0.0.7.tar.bz2 -rw-r--r-- 1 kevin mock 446707 Nov 12 11:55 clipsmm-0.0.7.tar.bz2.1 It looks like the version in your src.rpm was generated at 11:17am today, and the one on sourceforge was generated 11:55am? drwxr-xr-x 8 kevin mock 1024 Nov 12 11:55 clipsmm-0.0.7-from-sourceforge drwxr-xr-x 8 kevin mock 1024 Nov 12 11:17 clipsmm-0.0.7-from-src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 13 02:46:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2006 21:46:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 198098] Review Request: xarchiver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611130246.kAD2k6K2018607@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xarchiver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198098 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-11-12 21:46 EST ------- I'd like to see this package in as well... According to http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/Policy/StalledReviews we should add a comment that this review is considered stalled, and will be closed in 1 week if there is no response. Consider this that comment. ;) Christoph: Can you wait a week and if no response submit your package in a new review request (after closing this one)? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 13 02:51:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2006 21:51:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 211214] Review Request: mod_revocator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611130251.kAD2pmlm018791@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mod_revocator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211214 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-11-12 21:51 EST ------- ok, the Source url works for me now... The md5sum matches: 07307d8972e3442fd81d84e3852611c5 mod_revocator-1.0.2.tar.gz 07307d8972e3442fd81d84e3852611c5 mod_revocator-1.0.2.tar.gz.1 That was the last blocker I see, so this package is APPROVED. Don't forget to close this NEXTRELEASE once it's been imported and built. Also, consider reviewing another waiting package to help spread out the reviewing load. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 13 03:46:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2006 22:46:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 198098] Review Request: xarchiver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611130346.kAD3kjDA020166@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xarchiver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198098 fedora at christoph-wickert.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora at christoph-wickert.de ------- Additional Comments From fedora at christoph-wickert.de 2006-11-12 22:46 EST ------- (In reply to comment #9) > Christoph: Can you wait a week and if no response submit your package in a new > review request (after closing this one)? Sure, will do. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 13 04:12:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2006 23:12:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215267] New: Review Request: Django - A high-level Python Web framework Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215267 Summary: Review Request: Django - A high-level Python Web framework Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: michel.salim at gmail.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://hircus.org/fedora/Django/Django.spec SRPM URL: http://hircus.org/fedora/Django/Django-0.95-1.src.rpm Description: Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and a clean, pragmatic design. It focuses on automating as much as possible and adhering to the DRY (Don't Repeat Yourself) principle. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 13 05:28:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2006 00:28:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213192] Review Request: python-nltk_lite - Natural Language Toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611130528.kAD5Sxub023074@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-nltk_lite - Natural Language Toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213192 michel.salim at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From michel.salim at gmail.com 2006-11-13 00:28 EST ------- CFLAGS removed. Thanks for noticing - I guess I got it from the default Python template and forgot to remove it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 13 05:35:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2006 00:35:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215256] Review Request: firefox-32 - Alternate Launcher for 32bit Firefox In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611130535.kAD5ZXl3023396@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: firefox-32 - Alternate Launcher for 32bit Firefox https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215256 ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2006-11-13 00:35 EST ------- Bug #214100 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 13 05:41:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2006 00:41:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213511] Review Request: gxine - Gnome frontend for the xine multimedia library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611130541.kAD5fOQL023516@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gxine - Gnome frontend for the xine multimedia library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213511 ------- Additional Comments From michel.salim at gmail.com 2006-11-13 00:41 EST ------- It's probably not necessary to remove the non-free MIME types, otherwise, when xine-lib-extras-nonfree is installed gxine would still not be used to open MP3s etc. Back when Red Hat/Fedora still ships XMMS, it still would be set up to open MP3s, it would just display a message informing the user that MP3 playback is disabled. The latest .spec I posted as part of the review did have the BRs to have the browser plugin built. I agree with Martin though that it probably should be split into a subpackage. %find_lang is also used (Martin, check out /usr/lib/rpm/find-lang.sh - it has a --all-name option that the version called by %find_lang does not have). I just realized I forgot about the desktop file. Good call. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 13 06:09:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2006 01:09:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 207472] Review Request: ruby-activesupport - Utility classes and extension to Ruby's standard library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611130609.kAD69F03024776@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-activesupport - Utility classes and extension to Ruby's standard library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207472 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-11-13 01:09 EST ------- I believe that while reviewing ruby-activerecord I've found that this package needs a runtime dependency on ruby-irb, or else inclusion of breakpoint.rb fails. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 13 06:16:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2006 01:16:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 207473] Review Request: ruby-activerecord - Implements the ActiveRecord pattern for ORM In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611130616.kAD6GBTn024985@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-activerecord - Implements the ActiveRecord pattern for ORM https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207473 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-11-13 01:15 EST ------- I noted the presence of a nice test suite, and realized that it should actually be possible to run at least some of it because sqlite doesn't need a configured database server. So I set out to get the test suite to run with: %check cd test ruby -I "connections/native_sqlite3" base_test.rb In order to get this to work, it's necessary to add some BRs: ruby(active_support), ruby(sqlite3), ruby-irb The first two are pretty obvious, but the third was not. It looks like the ruby-activesupport package needs a runtime dependency on ruby-irb. In any case, the test suite unfortunately fails: Using native SQLite3 SQLite3 database not found at /builddir/build/BUILD/activerecord-1.14.4/test/fixtures/fixture_database.sqlite3. Rebuilding it. Executing 'sqlite3 /builddir/build/BUILD/activerecord-1.14.4/test/fixtures/fixture_database.sqlite3 "create table a (a integer); drop table a;"' SQLite3 database not found at /builddir/build/BUILD/activerecord-1.14.4/test/fixtures/fixture_database_2.sqlite3. Rebuilding it. Executing 'sqlite3 /builddir/build/BUILD/activerecord-1.14.4/test/fixtures/fixture_database_2.sqlite3 "create table a (a integer); drop table a;"' -- create_table(:taggings, {:force=>true}) -> 0.0158s -- create_table(:tags, {:force=>true}) -> 0.0160s -- create_table(:categorizations, {:force=>true}) -> 0.0158s -- add_column(:posts, :taggings_count, :integer, {:default=>0}) -> 0.0182s -- add_column(:authors, :author_address_id, :integer) -> 0.0162s -- create_table(:author_addresses, {:force=>true}) -> 0.0173s -- create_table(:author_favorites, {:force=>true}) -> 0.0240s Loaded suite base_test Started .......................................................................................................F............. Finished in 0.519048 seconds. 1) Failure: test_to_xml_including_multiple_associations(BasicsTest) [base_test.rb:1248]: is not true. 117 tests, 297 assertions, 1 failures, 0 errors It would be good to figure out what's going wrong here just in case there is an actual problem with the code on this platform. Review: * source files match upstream: ce66299a7fe99fdaf2c9747e850560b6 activerecord-1.14.4.tgz * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * dist tag is present. * build root is correct. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. License text not included upstream. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * package installs properly * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: ruby(active_record) = 1.14.4 ruby-activerecord = 1.14.4-1.fc7 = ruby(abi) = 1.8 ruby(active_support) ? Not sure about %check. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 13 06:19:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2006 01:19:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 207473] Review Request: ruby-activerecord - Implements the ActiveRecord pattern for ORM In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611130619.kAD6JARW025157@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-activerecord - Implements the ActiveRecord pattern for ORM https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207473 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-11-13 01:19 EST ------- Ah, it turns out this is a bug in the test: http://dev.rubyonrails.org/ticket/5268 I suggest just applying that patch and enabling the tests, unless you have some compelling reason why we shouldn't try to run them. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 13 06:21:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2006 01:21:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213511] Review Request: gxine - Gnome frontend for the xine multimedia library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611130621.kAD6LJne025242@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gxine - Gnome frontend for the xine multimedia library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213511 ------- Additional Comments From mola at c100c.com 2006-11-13 01:21 EST ------- Update Spec : http://www.c100c.com/fedora/gxine.spec Rrpm : http://www.c100c.com/fedora/gxine-0.5.8-4.src.rpm Add libXtst-devel in build requires -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 13 06:25:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2006 01:25:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 184011] Review Request: nickle In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611130625.kAD6PcqW025512@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nickle https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=184011 michel.salim at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From michel.salim at gmail.com 2006-11-13 01:25 EST ------- Rawhide build done. Thanks for reviewing! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 13 07:17:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2006 02:17:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 212909] Review Request: php-pear-HTML-Common - Base class for other HTML classes In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611130717.kAD7HKSw027032@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-HTML-Common - Base class for other HTML classes Alias: pear-HTML-Common https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212909 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 13 07:17:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2006 02:17:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 212915] Review Request: php-pear-HTML-Table - Class to easily design HTML tables In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611130717.kAD7HLHF027044@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-HTML-Table - Class to easily design HTML tables Alias: pear-HTML-Table https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212915 Bug 212915 depends on bug 212909, which changed state. Bug 212909 Summary: Review Request: php-pear-HTML-Common - Base class for other HTML classes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212909 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|NEW |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 13 07:17:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2006 02:17:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 212912] Review Request: php-pear-HTML-QuickForm - Class for creating, validating, processing HTML forms In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611130717.kAD7HWbq027056@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-HTML-QuickForm - Class for creating, validating, processing HTML forms Alias: pear-HTML-QuickForm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212912 Bug 212912 depends on bug 212909, which changed state. Bug 212909 Summary: Review Request: php-pear-HTML-Common - Base class for other HTML classes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212909 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|NEW |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 13 07:32:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2006 02:32:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 212715] Review Request: openvrml - VRML/X3D runtime library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611130732.kAD7WgeY027629@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: openvrml - VRML/X3D runtime library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212715 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2006-11-13 02:32 EST ------- Sorry for not having responded earlier, but ... I couldn't manage to look into this earlier. There still are some issues needing to be addressed: * Please '%%' instead of '%' in references to rpm-tags in %changelog entries. This is to work around rpm bogusly expanding '%' in %changelogs * Please add a blank line at the end of each %post*/%pre block. Some versions of rpm suffer from a bug which bogusly concatenate %post*/%pre otherwise. * openvrml-gl-devel and openvrml-devel contain *.pc's => each of them must Requires: pkgconfig * Building in mock fails: ... error: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found: /usr/share/info/dir => Add rm -f %{_infodir}/dir near to the end of %install -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 13 07:37:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2006 02:37:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 212915] Review Request: php-pear-HTML-Table - Class to easily design HTML tables In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611130737.kAD7bisb027811@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-HTML-Table - Class to easily design HTML tables Alias: pear-HTML-Table https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212915 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 13 07:37:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2006 02:37:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 212916] Review Request: php-pear-DB-DataObject-FormBuilder - Automatically build HTML_QuickForm objects In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611130737.kAD7bukM027834@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-DB-DataObject-FormBuilder - Automatically build HTML_QuickForm objects Alias: DataObj-FormBuilder https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212916 Bug 212916 depends on bug 212915, which changed state. Bug 212915 Summary: Review Request: php-pear-HTML-Table - Class to easily design HTML tables https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212915 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|NEW |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 13 07:57:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2006 02:57:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 212704] Review Request: manedit - UNIX Manual Page Editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611130757.kAD7vgBk028635@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: manedit - UNIX Manual Page Editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212704 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-11-13 02:57 EST ------- ok. APPROVED. Don't Forget to CLOSE this bug once you finish building package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 13 08:49:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2006 03:49:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 193106] Review Request: gtkmozembedmm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611130849.kAD8nte2031358@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtkmozembedmm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193106 ------- Additional Comments From karlthered at gmail.com 2006-11-13 03:49 EST ------- Yes, I asked Remi Collet (from Extras) about it, it avoids breaking packages depending on Gecko during updates. Anyway, the bindings have to be rebuilt each time gecko is updated. I will increase the versionning for devel when it will be uploaded on cvs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 13 09:07:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2006 04:07:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 207793] Review Request: flite - Small, fast speech synthesis engine (text-to-speech) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611130907.kAD97cPH001272@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: flite - Small, fast speech synthesis engine (text-to-speech) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207793 ------- Additional Comments From faucamp at csir.co.za 2006-11-13 04:07 EST ------- New build: Spec URL: http://dialogpalette.sourceforge.net/extras/fedora/flite.spec SRPM URL: http://dialogpalette.sourceforge.net/extras/fedora/flite-1.3-6.src.rpm Changes: - Recreated patch to allow shared libraries to build correctly (sharedlibs.patch) - "flite" and "flite_time" binaries now link to flite shared libraries (sharedlibs.patch) - Simplified the documentation patch filename - Modified patch steps in %prep to create backup files with different suffixes - Removed "_smp_flags" macro from %build for all archs The new shared libraries patch also adds pretty much the same functionality as the suggested parallel build patch (attachment id=140079); sadly, parallel builds still fails sometimes :-(, so I have removed "_smp_flags" from %build completely. I have tested the shared libraries with ldd -r and they're all fine now. rpmlint is silent, except for a "no documentation" warning for flite-devel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 13 09:27:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2006 04:27:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 212704] Review Request: manedit - UNIX Manual Page Editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611130927.kAD9RxZu005894@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: manedit - UNIX Manual Page Editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212704 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-11-13 04:27 EST ------- Okay. * Rebuild for FE-devel succeeded. * SyncNeeded is requested for FE-6 (FE-5 branch already exists) * Add manedit to owners.list, comps files * Declare that manedit is unorphaned Thank you for reviewing and approving this package. Now I close this bug as CLOSED NEXTRELEASE. NOTE: I have not yet received any response from upstream. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 13 09:35:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2006 04:35:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 209311] Review Request: espeak - Software speech synthesizer (text-to-speech) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611130935.kAD9ZY3o006342@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: espeak - Software speech synthesizer (text-to-speech) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209311 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-11-13 04:35 EST ------- By the way, have you tried to rebuild this package on FE buildsys? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 13 09:45:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2006 04:45:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 209311] Review Request: espeak - Software speech synthesizer (text-to-speech) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611130945.kAD9jTab006937@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: espeak - Software speech synthesizer (text-to-speech) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209311 ------- Additional Comments From faucamp at csir.co.za 2006-11-13 04:45 EST ------- Yes, but the plague-client build request itself is denied with the following error: "Server returned an error: Insufficient privileges.". All of by client-side setup seems to be fine, so following advice from fedora-maintainers, I have requested assistance from the Fedora Infrastructure team (created a ticket in their bugtracker), and am now waiting for a response. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 13 09:48:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2006 04:48:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214025] Review Request: Tracker - An object database, tag/metadata database, search tool and indexer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611130948.kAD9mOQC007177@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Tracker - An object database, tag/metadata database, search tool and indexer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214025 Bug 214025 depends on bug 214112, which changed state. Bug 214112 Summary: Remove obsoletes on tracker https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214112 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|RAWHIDE | Status|CLOSED |NEW -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 13 10:07:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2006 05:07:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214025] Review Request: Tracker - An object database, tag/metadata database, search tool and indexer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611131007.kADA7G2n008342@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Tracker - An object database, tag/metadata database, search tool and indexer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214025 Bug 214025 depends on bug 214112, which changed state. Bug 214112 Summary: Remove obsoletes on tracker https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214112 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NOTABUG Status|NEW |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 13 10:18:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2006 05:18:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215292] New: Review Request: cups-pdf - Extension for creating pdf-Files with CUPS Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215292 Summary: Review Request: cups-pdf - Extension for creating pdf- Files with CUPS Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: Fedora at FamilleCollet.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://remi.collet.free.fr/rpms/extras/cups-pdf.spec SRPM URL: http://remi.collet.free.fr/rpms/extras/cups-pdf-2.4.2-1.fc7.src.rpm Lock Log: http://remi.collet.free.fr/rpms/extras/cups-pdf-build.log Description: "cups-pdf" is a backend script for use with CUPS - the "Common UNIX Printing System" (see more for CUPS under http://www.cups.org/). "cups-pdf" uses the ghostscript pdfwrite device to produce PDF Files. This version has been modified to store the PDF files on the Desktop of the user. This behavior can be changed by editing the configuration file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 13 10:21:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2006 05:21:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215256] Review Request: firefox-32 - Alternate Launcher for 32bit Firefox In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611131021.kADALksq009300@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: firefox-32 - Alternate Launcher for 32bit Firefox https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215256 mattdm at mattdm.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mattdm at mattdm.org ------- Additional Comments From mattdm at mattdm.org 2006-11-13 05:21 EST ------- For what ut's worth, we've chosen to locally hack the launch script to prefer the i386 version if available. Despite the resolution of bug #214100, that seems like the logical way for that script to work anyway. But this seems like it may be a better approach. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 13 11:20:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2006 06:20:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 211626] Review Request: xtide - Calculate tide all over the world In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611131120.kADBKjLV013275@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xtide - Calculate tide all over the world https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211626 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-11-13 06:20 EST ------- (In reply to comment #78) > Upstream here. Thank you for replying to me and joining this bugzilla ticket. > tcd-utils is for the other 1% who actually do know enough to edit tide > data in a meaningful way and have reason to do it. It was never > cleaned up for the 99% market. The people who use it (counted on one > hand) have never complained about having to compile it from ugly > source snapshots. My idea is that providing tcd-utils is very preferable for people who lives where the tcd data is not provided originally (like me, in Japan). The person may get harmonics data near their location and may have to create tcd data by their own. > > The inclusion of tcd-utils in Fedora was perhaps motivated by some > policy that discouraged shipping binary files? Originally it was so. > harmonics-dwf from > http://www.flaterco.com/xtide/files.html is maintained by me. The > legalese for harmonics-dwf is at > http://www.flaterco.com/xtide/harmonics_boilerplate.txt. Umm, anyway I cannot include harmonics-dwf data into this package because the restriction of 'non-commercial' or 'without charge' cannot be accepted. > > A-1: How do you think of providing libtcd shared dynamic library seperately? > > This makes sense if you really do want to deliver tideEditor or other > extras in Fedora. But do you *really* want to do that? For the left two utilities in tcd-utils (build_tide_db, restore_tide_db) is preferable as described above. Those who have to get harmonics data by themself may want to use tideEditor, too. > > So, > > B-1: how do you think of moving tideEditor to XTide tarball? > > It would make sense if it were used by more than 1% of users. But I > don't think that it is, or would be, even if it were installed for > them automagically. Patrice and Michael, what do you think of this? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 13 11:26:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2006 06:26:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 198098] Review Request: xarchiver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611131126.kADBQjE6013631@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xarchiver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198098 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-11-13 06:26 EST ------- (In reply to comment #8) http://home.arcor.de/christoph.wickert/fedora/extras/review/SPECS/xarchiver.spec > http://home.arcor.de/christoph.wickert/fedora/extras/review/SRPMS/xarchiver-0.4.2-0.1.rc2.fc7.src.rpm > > Maybe it's easier to drop the sub-package, but then we'll have to include > fedora-xarchiver.tap in thunar-archive-plugin. Simply leaving it in the > xarchiver main package (without a dependency on the archive plugin) would lead > to an unowned /usr/libexec/thunar-archive-plugin/ if thunar(-archive-plugin) is > not installed. If the archive plugin is installed, this dir would be owned by > two packages. Bad Idea. I don't think it is a bad idea in that case. Indeed, thunar-archive-plugin has a plugin-script system. This allows for some flexibility we should take advantage of. In my opinion it should be possible to have a random package (preferrably a graphical unarchiver package ;-) drop a script in /usr/libexec/thunar-archive-plugin/ even if thunar-archive-plugin isn't installed. To still have right directory owning, there are 2 possibilities: * have all plugin packages own /usr/libexec/thunar-archive-plugin/ * add a filesystem-like package which holds that directory and that packages depend on. Both options may make sense depending on the case, here I think having multiple owners is the cleanest way. > Opinions? Drop the sub-package and move the file over to thunar-archive-plugin? No, drop the sub-package and own /usr/libexec/thunar-archive-plugin/. In any case I don't think that having a package only for the thunar-archive-plugin plugin script makes sense. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 13 11:42:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2006 06:42:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214818] Review Request: audacious+audacious-plugins - A GTK2 based media player similar to xmms In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611131142.kADBgDNM014417@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: audacious+audacious-plugins - A GTK2 based media player similar to xmms https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214818 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-11-13 06:42 EST ------- Ralf, Are you interested in splitting plugings package? Are you working on it? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 13 11:50:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2006 06:50:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214818] Review Request: audacious+audacious-plugins - A GTK2 based media player similar to xmms In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611131150.kADBojKX014879@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: audacious+audacious-plugins - A GTK2 based media player similar to xmms https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214818 ------- Additional Comments From redhat-bugzilla at camperquake.de 2006-11-13 06:50 EST ------- Hmm. It seems like bugzilla has eaten my reply to comment #8. Short version: Splitting off additional plugins in separate packages is hard because of the upgrade path, so while I am interested in splitting of packages in general (and have done so with the new pulseaudio output plugin in the new audacious-plugins) splitting off plugins which are contained in the current audacious-1.1.x packages will possibly not happen. Definitely not during this update. The -libs subpackage was introduced to prevent circular dependencies between audacious and audacious-plugins. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 13 12:32:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2006 07:32:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 207793] Review Request: flite - Small, fast speech synthesis engine (text-to-speech) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611131232.kADCWWbJ016980@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: flite - Small, fast speech synthesis engine (text-to-speech) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207793 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-11-13 07:32 EST ------- Well, almost okay. 1. From http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines : * Filesystem Layout - I think all header files in -devel package should be moved to %{_includedir}/%{name} (then %{_includedir}/%{name} should be owned). * Timestamps cp %{SOURCE1} . Use 'cp -p' to keep timestamps. 2. From http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines : = Nothing. 3. Other things I have noticed: * Patches: - Well, the name of the patch and the suffix when applying it are inconsistent..... - I don't think patching to configure (not configure.in) is preferable. Would you rewrite sharedlibs.patch and spec file so that the patch is applied for configure.in and then 'autoconf' is called (this requires 'autoconf' for BuildRequires)? - Note: usually flite-1.3-*****.patch is preferable for the names of the patches. * parallel make - Please add some comments to spec file that "this package fails parallel make". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 13 12:36:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2006 07:36:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 211626] Review Request: xtide - Calculate tide all over the world In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611131236.kADCakfe017339@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xtide - Calculate tide all over the world https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211626 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-11-13 07:36 EST ------- (In reply to comment #79) > Patrice and Michael, what do you think of this? First I'd like to thank David for joining to this ticket. I am not sure that the argument about 1% users is a show stopper for inclusion in extras. As strange as it may look, having 1 fedora user use a program may be a sufficient reason to include it in extras. Indeed if this user really want to have a rpm to ease system management he will rebuild it locally anyway. But then if he rebuilds it locally, building it in extras isn't much additional work and then you get 'for free' easy reinstallation with yum install, interesting in case you move to another location or have to reinstall your computer, rebuild on all extras supported arches - interesting in case you buy a new computer, and more visibility for others to help you fix your package. And then if you have 2 users it becomes very interesting since it avoids double work on creating and rebuilding local rpms. Others may have different opinions, but even for packages I may be the only one to use in fedora (or even on earth) I prefer to have it in extras for the ease of system management it brings with. Anyway I don't think that build_tide_db, restore_tide_db should be shipped with libtcd anymore, as, if I understand well they aren't of much use now. However I still think that tideEditor may be usefull and is worth packaging. My current thoughts are that: * the issue of inter-dependencies is in fact moot, we want to use the tcd shipped by David, and since we cannot package it in fedora due to licensing the way things are done to help the user get it are right. * If David don't want to bring tideEditor in with Xtide, resplit tcd-utils .src.rpm and submit it separately. * split the main package the way you like, as I still think that most of what I said at the end of #Comment 75 is relevant. At least split off libtcd and libtcd-devel which would contain only the libtcd library and devel package. For xttpd/common package do what you prefer. * follow David decision regarding shared libraries. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 13 12:49:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2006 07:49:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 207793] Review Request: flite - Small, fast speech synthesis engine (text-to-speech) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611131249.kADCnQpH018603@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: flite - Small, fast speech synthesis engine (text-to-speech) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207793 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-11-13 07:49 EST ------- (In reply to comment #21) > - I don't think patching to configure (not configure.in) is > preferable. Would you rewrite sharedlibs.patch and spec > file so that the patch is applied for configure.in and > then 'autoconf' is called (this requires 'autoconf' for > BuildRequires)? Actually I think that the reverse is true. Avoiding to rerun the autotools is better, so patching configure is better. It may be right to patch both configure and configure.in especially if the configure.in is interesting for submission upstream. Sometimes the patch is too important, so patching configure is necessary. Here the configure patch has allready been done with newer autoconf than what came with flite, but I think that we shouldd refrain from using an even newer version of autotools and the patch should be kept as is. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 13 12:52:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2006 07:52:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 207793] Review Request: flite - Small, fast speech synthesis engine (text-to-speech) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611131252.kADCqL9d019161@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: flite - Small, fast speech synthesis engine (text-to-speech) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207793 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-11-13 07:52 EST ------- > Actually I think that the reverse is true. Avoiding to rerun > the autotools is better, so patching configure is better. It may be > right to patch both configure and configure.in especially if the > configure.in is interesting for submission upstream. Sometimes > the patch is too important, so patching configure is necessary. Sorry, here it should have read "Sometimes the patch is too important, so patching configure.in and rerunning the autotools is necessary." > Here the configure patch has allready been done with newer autoconf > than what came with flite, but I think that we shouldd refrain from > using an even newer version of autotools and the patch should be > kept as is. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 13 13:07:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2006 08:07:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 207793] Review Request: flite - Small, fast speech synthesis engine (text-to-speech) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611131307.kADD7ruX021030@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: flite - Small, fast speech synthesis engine (text-to-speech) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207793 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-11-13 08:07 EST ------- I think for this package patching to configure.in is more preferable because: * as far as I read the patch, the diff for configure is too large so that I cannot figure out what is actually changed....., while * diff for configure.in (also in the patch) is very small and * the diff for configure are between * one is original configure make from configure.in with autoconf 2.57 * the other is modified configure which _seems_ to be generated by autoconf 2.13 (why?) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 13 13:26:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2006 08:26:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214669] Review Request: logserial In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611131326.kADDQRL0023357@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: logserial https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214669 ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2006-11-13 08:26 EST ------- You are perfectly right, there was an error in the patch. Please retry the new versions, available as http://wdl.lug.ro/linux/rpms/logserial/logserial.spec and http://wdl.lug.ro/linux/rpms/logserial/logserial-0.4.2-3.src.rpm Building in mock on a i386 machine with arch=i686 and without any argument seemed OK. Unfortunately my x86_64 test machine is temporary out of function, so I could not test that, too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 13 13:29:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2006 08:29:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 207793] Review Request: flite - Small, fast speech synthesis engine (text-to-speech) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611131329.kADDTF3M023472@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: flite - Small, fast speech synthesis engine (text-to-speech) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207793 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-11-13 08:29 EST ------- (In reply to comment #24) > I think for this package patching to configure.in is more > preferable because: > * as far as I read the patch, the diff for configure is too large > so that I cannot figure out what is actually changed....., while > * diff for configure.in (also in the patch) is very small and > * the diff for configure are between > * one is original configure make from configure.in with autoconf 2.57 > * the other is modified configure which _seems_ to be generated by > autoconf 2.13 (why?) Ah ok, I got it wrong, I thought the 2.13 one was from upstream. In that case it is indeed better to rerun autoconf since 2.59 is much more similar to 2.57 than 2.13 is. Sorry for the noise... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 13 13:32:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2006 08:32:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 207793] Review Request: flite - Small, fast speech synthesis engine (text-to-speech) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611131332.kADDWtsM023624@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: flite - Small, fast speech synthesis engine (text-to-speech) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207793 ------- Additional Comments From faucamp at csir.co.za 2006-11-13 08:32 EST ------- (In reply to comment #24) > I think for this package patching to configure.in is more > preferable because: > * as far as I read the patch, the diff for configure is too large > so that I cannot figure out what is actually changed....., while > * diff for configure.in (also in the patch) is very small and > * the diff for configure are between > * one is original configure make from configure.in with autoconf 2.57 > * the other is modified configure which _seems_ to be generated by > autoconf 2.13 (why?) I actually got this patch from a third party, Lukas Loehrer (hence the old autoconf), see comment #1 on this bug report. This is also the reason why I didn't use cp -p on Source1 (as it was created by me, and is not used for anything in the package). During the rewrite of the sharelibs patch, I actually started doing a different ALSA patch (based on the ALSA support for Flite 1.2), which only requires MINOR modification to configure.in and the addition of a modified src/audio/au_alsa.c (from flite 1.2) - because maintaining the current patch is a bit of a hassle, should things change. However, I could not get this new patch to build cleanly before today (one of the flite debug tools complained about undefined symbols, so I must have missed something somewhere); I will look into it again. As for the other points: silly mistakes :-), sorry. Will fix as soon as possible. Thanks again for the feedback. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 13 13:39:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2006 08:39:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215256] Review Request: firefox-32 - Alternate Launcher for 32bit Firefox In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611131339.kADDd717023844@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: firefox-32 - Alternate Launcher for 32bit Firefox https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215256 matthias at rpmforge.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |matthias at rpmforge.net ------- Additional Comments From matthias at rpmforge.net 2006-11-13 08:38 EST ------- Why include Sources as Patches? If there is no way to require the 32bit package from this "wrapper", then the package seems pretty broken, no? Would "Requires: /usr/lib/mozilla" work? Oh, and Matthias Saou thinks it's pretty weird to address one's self using the 3rd person :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 13 13:45:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2006 08:45:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 211834] Review Request: gaim-libnotify - libnotify notification plugin for gaim In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611131345.kADDjLF1024163@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gaim-libnotify - libnotify notification plugin for gaim https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211834 ------- Additional Comments From jon.nettleton at gmail.com 2006-11-13 08:45 EST ------- I think the final changes have been put in place and everything should be up to snuff. At least for section 1) above. I am not sure what this means. 2) = Nothing? Spec URL: http://www.hekanetworks.com/~jnettlet/gaim-libnotify/gaim-libnotify.spec SRPM URL: http://www.hekanetworks.com/~jnettlet/gaim-libnotify/gaim-libnotify-0.12-3.fc6.src.rpm I will try and get some other review requests in this week, but I am pretty busy and can't guarantee anything. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 13 13:58:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2006 08:58:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215256] Review Request: firefox-32 - Alternate Launcher for 32bit Firefox In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611131358.kADDwZev025406@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: firefox-32 - Alternate Launcher for 32bit Firefox https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215256 ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2006-11-13 08:58 EST ------- > Why include Sources as Patches? So it can be tracked in VCS instead of the binary cache. > If there is no way to require the 32bit package from this "wrapper", then the > package seems pretty broken, no? Would "Requires: /usr/lib/mozilla" work? You might be correct, however Bug #214100 is the real reasonable thing to do. Given that has been rejected this package is our only solution until nspluginwrapper is made perfect. > Oh, and Matthias Saou thinks it's pretty weird to address one's self using the > 3rd person :-) That part is actually in the package %description. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 13 14:05:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2006 09:05:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215256] Review Request: firefox-32 - Alternate Launcher for 32bit Firefox In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611131405.kADE55ba026062@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: firefox-32 - Alternate Launcher for 32bit Firefox https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215256 ------- Additional Comments From matthias at rpmforge.net 2006-11-13 09:05 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > > Why include Sources as Patches? > > So it can be tracked in VCS instead of the binary cache. I'm not aware of any restriction which would disallow commiting "SourceX:" files into CVS. I actually do this a lot with scripts, desktop entries and such. But putting source files as "PatchX:" seems wrong. Those aren't patches. > > If there is no way to require the 32bit package from this "wrapper", then the > > package seems pretty broken, no? Would "Requires: /usr/lib/mozilla" work? > > You might be correct, however Bug #214100 is the real reasonable thing to do. > Given that has been rejected this package is our only solution until > nspluginwrapper is made perfect. But without a proper requirement to make sure the 32bit version of firefox will be available, this package will be broken. > > Oh, and Matthias Saou thinks it's pretty weird to address one's self using the > > 3rd person :-) > > That part is actually in the package %description. Then I'd suggest you remove it. Personal opinions should be expressed on lists, in bugzilla entries, in CVS commit messages... but not in "end user readable areas" like descriptions, included READMEs and such. Just my personal advice, though. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 13 14:04:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2006 09:04:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 192434] Review Request: compiz-quinn In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611131404.kADE4uaD026035@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compiz-quinn https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192434 ------- Additional Comments From nightbox at hotmail.com 2006-11-13 09:04 EST ------- Seeing the differences between compiz and beryl, I think I would like beryl in fedora core. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 13 14:12:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2006 09:12:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215256] Review Request: firefox-32 - Alternate Launcher for 32bit Firefox In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611131412.kADEC93E026863@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: firefox-32 - Alternate Launcher for 32bit Firefox https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215256 ------- Additional Comments From mattdm at mattdm.org 2006-11-13 09:12 EST ------- Rather than requiring the 32-bit version, can it be made to detect if the 32-bit version is there and "hide" otherwise? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 13 14:18:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2006 09:18:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215256] Review Request: firefox-32 - Alternate Launcher for 32bit Firefox In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611131418.kADEIDtU027251@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: firefox-32 - Alternate Launcher for 32bit Firefox https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215256 ------- Additional Comments From matthias at rpmforge.net 2006-11-13 09:18 EST ------- (In reply to comment #7) > Rather than requiring the 32-bit version, can it be made to detect if the 32-bit > version is there and "hide" otherwise? Interesting idea, but I think it'll just confuse users. "Hey, I installed it but I can't find it in the menus!?" -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 13 14:42:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2006 09:42:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 187351] Review Request: bmpx - Media player with the WinAmp GUI In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611131442.kADEgO7R030644@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bmpx - Media player with the WinAmp GUI https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187351 matthias at rpmforge.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX BugsThisDependsOn|191036 | OtherBugsDependingO|163776 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From matthias at rpmforge.net 2006-11-13 09:42 EST ------- Well, I've clearly lost interest in maintaing bmpx for Extras : My perception is that upstream doesn't really know what they want (they went for an xmms fork to a Rhythmbox-like player written in C++...), and seem more interested in working on beta releases with plenty of new features than releasing stable and solid versions of their player. I'll withdraw this submission and welcome anyone to re-submit bmpx if they're interested in maintaining it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 13 14:42:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2006 09:42:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 191036] Review Request: libmp4v2 a library for handling the mp4 container format In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611131442.kADEgwIm030799@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libmp4v2 a library for handling the mp4 container format https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191036 matthias at rpmforge.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|187351 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 13 14:54:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2006 09:54:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213511] Review Request: gxine - Gnome frontend for the xine multimedia library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611131454.kADEs4K0032630@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gxine - Gnome frontend for the xine multimedia library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213511 ------- Additional Comments From martin.sourada at seznam.cz 2006-11-13 09:54 EST ------- (In reply to comment #18) > It's probably not necessary to remove the non-free MIME types, otherwise, when > xine-lib-extras-nonfree is installed gxine would still not be used to open MP3s > etc. Back when Red Hat/Fedora still ships XMMS, it still would be set up to open > MP3s, it would just display a message informing the user that MP3 playback is > disabled. Yes, if it does not violate fedora guidelines than it is better to leave it as it is :-). > The latest .spec I posted as part of the review did have the BRs to have the > browser plugin built. I agree with Martin though that it probably should be > split into a subpackage. No, you don't build (I think) browser plug-in and you do not install it (at this point I am sure). Check INSTALL file for more info. You must copy or symlink the gxineplugin.so to /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins. About splitting: not necessary, I think, but all packages I have seen have browser plug-in in subpackage. > %find_lang is also used (Martin, check out > /usr/lib/rpm/find-lang.sh - it has a --all-name option that the version called > by %find_lang does not have). I just like the look of %find_lang more - I don't like hard-coded paths in spec file if not necessary. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 13 14:56:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2006 09:56:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213511] Review Request: gxine - Gnome frontend for the xine multimedia library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611131456.kADEuRc3000594@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gxine - Gnome frontend for the xine multimedia library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213511 ------- Additional Comments From martin.sourada at seznam.cz 2006-11-13 09:56 EST ------- Some hints about BR according to INSTALL: > gxine will use the following libraries if their header files are available at > compile time: > > X DPMS extn This is in library libXext-devel > gxine will use the following libraries unless configured not to do so or > their header files aren't available at compile time: > dbus (glib) library dbus-glib-devel > gxine requires the following packages at compile time: > > pkg-config library pkgconfig > gxine's browser plugin requires the following libraries: > > X Athena widgets > gxine's browser plugin requires the following packages at compile time: > > libnspr libraries libXaw-devel and nspr-devel >From configure.ac I can read one another optional BR: libXrandr-devel and also it checks for pango (pango-devel) - not optional. So I think you should add BuildRequire: nspr-devel libXaw-devel pkgconfig pango-devel. Other BR is on your judge since they are optional. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 13 15:20:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2006 10:20:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 212503] Review Request: perl-WWW-Babelfish - Perl extension for translation via Babelfish or Google In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611131520.kADFKuMI002719@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-WWW-Babelfish - Perl extension for translation via Babelfish or Google https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212503 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 13 15:45:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2006 10:45:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 212503] Review Request: perl-WWW-Babelfish - Perl extension for translation via Babelfish or Google In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611131545.kADFj0cK005995@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-WWW-Babelfish - Perl extension for translation via Babelfish or Google https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212503 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-11-13 10:44 EST ------- * source files match upstream: bc6293dabcbf5e96435fc8acaf8ac939 WWW-Babelfish-0.15.tar.gz * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * dist tag is present. * build root is correct. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. License text not included upstream. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * package installs properly * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: perl(WWW::Babelfish) = 0.15 perl-WWW-Babelfish = 0.15-1.fc7 = perl >= 0:5.008 perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8) perl(AutoLoader) perl(Encode) perl(Exporter) perl(HTML::TokeParser) perl(HTTP::Request::Common) perl(IO::String) perl(LWP::UserAgent) perl(strict) perl(vars) * %check is present and the single trivial test passes: 1..1 ok 1 * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 13 15:46:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2006 10:46:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214024] Review Request: perl-Net-DBus - Net::DBus Perl module In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611131546.kADFkOAF006227@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-DBus - Net::DBus Perl module https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214024 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 13 15:53:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2006 10:53:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215185] Review Request: compat-libosip2 - compatability package for libosip2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611131553.kADFrCq1007203@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compat-libosip2 - compatability package for libosip2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215185 jeff at ocjtech.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: compat- |Review Request: compat- |libosip2-2.2.2 - |libosip2 - compatability |compatability package for |package for libosip2 |libosip2 | ------- Additional Comments From jeff at ocjtech.us 2006-11-13 10:53 EST ------- Spec URL: http://repo.ocjtech.us/misc/fedora/6/SRPMS/compat-libosip2-2.2.2-7.fc6.spec SRPM URL: http://repo.ocjtech.us/misc/fedora/6/SRPMS/compat-libosip2-2.2.2-7.fc6.src.rpm * Mon Nov 13 2006 Jeffrey C. Ollie - 2.2.2-7 - Fix up provides/obsoletes/conflicts - Fix package name -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 13 15:57:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2006 10:57:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215267] Review Request: Django - A high-level Python Web framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611131557.kADFvgAi007727@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Django - A high-level Python Web framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215267 jamatos at fc.up.pt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jamatos at fc.up.pt OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jamatos at fc.up.pt 2006-11-13 10:57 EST ------- The package looks OK, expect a formal review either late today or tomorrow. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 13 16:13:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2006 11:13:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214024] Review Request: perl-Net-DBus - Net::DBus Perl module In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611131613.kADGDimG009639@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-DBus - Net::DBus Perl module https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214024 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-11-13 11:13 EST ------- Hmm, this fails to build in mock for me: + /usr/bin/perl Makefile.PL INSTALLDIRS=vendor 'OPTIMIZE=-O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64 -mtune=generic' could not run 'pkg-config' to determine compiler/linker flags for dbus library: No such file or directory error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.26604 (%build) Looks like dbus-devel is missing a dependency on pkgconfig. Until it gets one, you'll need to add BR: pkgconfig yourself. Getting past that, the tests fail all over the place because XML::Twig is missing. Adding that, one of the tests still fails: t/30-server.....................process 23518: Applications must not close shared connections - see dbus_connection_close() docs. This is a bug in the application. /lib64/libdbus-1.so.3 [0x2aaaac4dcb1c] /lib64/libdbus-1.so.3 [0x2aaaac4dc1d9] /lib64/libdbus-1.so.3 [0x2aaaac4d1fea] /builddir/build/BUILD/Net-DBus-0.33.4/blib/arch/auto/Net/DBus/DBus.so(XS_Net__DBus__Binding__C__Connection_dbus_connection_disconnect+0x1ca) [0x2aaaac28edda] /usr/lib64/perl5/5.8.8/x86_64-linux-thread-multi/CORE/libperl.so(Perl_pp_entersub+0x3f6) [0x2aaaaad56916] /usr/lib64/perl5/5.8.8/x86_64-linux-thread-multi/CORE/libperl.so(Perl_runops_standard+0xe) [0x2aaaaad501de] /usr/lib64/perl5/5.8.8/x86_64-linux-thread-multi/CORE/libperl.so(perl_run+0x30a) [0x2aaaaacfe03a] /usr/bin/perl(main+0xfc) [0x40179c] /lib64/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xf4) [0x2aaaabf21924] /usr/bin/perl [0x401609] dubious Test returned status 0 (wstat 6, 0x6) DIED. FAILED tests 9-11 Failed 3/11 tests, 72.73% okay I'm not sure what to do from here. An FC5 build does pass but I'm not set up to do FC6 builds yet. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 13 16:24:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2006 11:24:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215256] Review Request: firefox-32 - Alternate Launcher for 32bit Firefox In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611131624.kADGO8KP010792@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: firefox-32 - Alternate Launcher for 32bit Firefox https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215256 ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2006-11-13 11:23 EST ------- > I'm not aware of any restriction which would disallow commiting "SourceX:" > files into CVS. I actually do this a lot with scripts, desktop entries and > such. But putting source files as "PatchX:" seems wrong. Those aren't patches Hmm, you might be right. cvs-import.sh is what put SOURCE files into the binary holding place. If I import it manually it should be fine. OK, I'll change it to SOURCE. > But without a proper requirement to make sure the 32bit version of firefox > will be available, this package will be broken. Not necessarily. x86_64 default install pulls in both firefox.i386 and firefox.x86_64. This package is installable only on x86_64. Sure, it is not perfect, but do we have a better option? > Rather than requiring the 32-bit version, can it be made to detect if the > 32-bit version is there and "hide" otherwise? Sounds good in theory, but there is actually NO WAY to do so. Same problem that there is no way of requiring firefox.i386 specifically because of the versioned directories that change arbitrarily. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 13 16:35:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2006 11:35:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215292] Review Request: cups-pdf - Extension for creating pdf-Files with CUPS In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611131635.kADGZag9011907@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cups-pdf - Extension for creating pdf-Files with CUPS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215292 jeff at ocjtech.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jeff at ocjtech.us OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jeff at ocjtech.us 2006-11-13 11:35 EST ------- ! Source url is invalid, should be: http://www.physik.uni-wuerzburg.de/~vrbehr/cups-pdf/src/%{name}_%{version}.tar.gz * source files match upstream 97b21ab9dc98659bfce17da921ee2790 cups-pdf_2.4.2.tar.gz 97b21ab9dc98659bfce17da921ee2790 cups-pdf_2.4.2.tar.gz.1 * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * dist tag is present. * build root is correct. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. License text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * compiler flags are appropriate. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (fc6 i386). * package installs properly. Print queue gets created and works as advertised. * rpmlint says: E: cups-pdf description-line-too-long "cups-pdf" is a backend script for use with CUPS - the "Common UNIX Printing System" E: cups-pdf description-line-too-long (see more for CUPS under http://www.cups.org/). "cups-pdf" uses the ghostscript pdfwrite E: cups-pdf description-line-too-long This version has been modified to store the PDF files on the Desktop of the user. I won't block the review because of these, but if you could re-wrap the description text before building the packages that'd be great. E: cups-pdf non-readable /usr/lib/cups/backend/cups-pdf 0700 E: cups-pdf non-standard-executable-perm /usr/lib/cups/backend/cups-pdf 0700 I think that these can be ignored. * %check is not present; There is no test code in the districution. * no shared libraries are present * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * scriptlets are OK * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers * no unversioned .so file * no pkconfig file * no libtool .la droppings. Some minor points: 1) It looks like the PPD file could be gzipped, but since it's only 21K to start with it's not a big deal. 2) Instead of creating the INSTALL.fedora with during %prep I'd include it as a separate source file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 13 16:36:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2006 11:36:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214266] Review Request: perl-Moose-Policy - Moose-mounted police In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611131636.kADGaSfC012082@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Moose-Policy - Moose-mounted police https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214266 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 13 16:39:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2006 11:39:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 212503] Review Request: perl-WWW-Babelfish - Perl extension for translation via Babelfish or Google In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611131639.kADGdQjN012585@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-WWW-Babelfish - Perl extension for translation via Babelfish or Google https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212503 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-11-13 11:39 EST ------- Imported, building for devel and FC-5,6 branches requested. Thanks for the review! :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 13 16:51:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2006 11:51:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 208420] Review Request: conky - A system monitor for X originally based on the torsmo code In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611131651.kADGp12A013669@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: conky - A system monitor for X originally based on the torsmo code https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208420 ------- Additional Comments From miker5slow at grandecom.net 2006-11-13 11:51 EST ------- http://errr.fluxbox-wiki.org/fedora_stuff/conky/5/conky.spec http://errr.fluxbox-wiki.org/fedora_stuff/conky/5/conky-1.4.3-1.src.rpm A new release has come out, they removed the dlopen() stuff and xmms and bmp support completely. Im not sure at this time if it will build in mock, but I did build from my home dir and it works fine thus far. Once I finish setting up my local repos again I will build in mock. In the mean time how does this lokk.. no rpmlint errors.. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 13 16:54:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2006 11:54:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214024] Review Request: perl-Net-DBus - Net::DBus Perl module In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611131654.kADGseiu014071@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-DBus - Net::DBus Perl module https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214024 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-11-13 11:54 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > Hmm, this fails to build in mock for me: > > + /usr/bin/perl Makefile.PL INSTALLDIRS=vendor 'OPTIMIZE=-O2 -g -pipe -Wall > -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 > -m64 -mtune=generic' > could not run 'pkg-config' to determine compiler/linker flags for dbus library: > No such file or directory > error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.26604 (%build) > > Looks like dbus-devel is missing a dependency on pkgconfig. Until it gets one, > you'll need to add BR: pkgconfig yourself. Added. Also filed a bug against the dbus package on this: bug 215346. > Getting past that, the tests fail all over the place because XML::Twig is > missing. Adding that, one of the tests still fails: > > t/30-server.....................process 23518: Applications must not close > shared connections - see dbus_connection_close() docs. This is a bug in the > application. > /lib64/libdbus-1.so.3 [0x2aaaac4dcb1c] > /lib64/libdbus-1.so.3 [0x2aaaac4dc1d9] > /lib64/libdbus-1.so.3 [0x2aaaac4d1fea] > > /builddir/build/BUILD/Net-DBus-0.33.4/blib/arch/auto/Net/DBus/DBus.so(XS_Net__DBus__Binding__C__Connection_dbus_connection_disconnect+0x1ca) > [0x2aaaac28edda] > > /usr/lib64/perl5/5.8.8/x86_64-linux-thread-multi/CORE/libperl.so(Perl_pp_entersub+0x3f6) > [0x2aaaaad56916] > > /usr/lib64/perl5/5.8.8/x86_64-linux-thread-multi/CORE/libperl.so(Perl_runops_standard+0xe) > [0x2aaaaad501de] > > /usr/lib64/perl5/5.8.8/x86_64-linux-thread-multi/CORE/libperl.so(perl_run+0x30a) > [0x2aaaaacfe03a] > /usr/bin/perl(main+0xfc) [0x40179c] > /lib64/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xf4) [0x2aaaabf21924] > /usr/bin/perl [0x401609] > dubious > Test returned status 0 (wstat 6, 0x6) > DIED. FAILED tests 9-11 > Failed 3/11 tests, 72.73% okay > > I'm not sure what to do from here. An FC5 build does pass but I'm not set up to > do FC6 builds yet. Hrm, that's odd. (XML::Twig added, as well.) I'm building this on a FC6/x86_64 box, and not only does this test pass but I've used it to interact with dnsmasq... I'll try building it in mock over here and taking a peek at the buildlog. Maybe it's silently depending on something and almost as silently failing? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 13 17:12:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2006 12:12:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214266] Review Request: perl-Moose-Policy - Moose-mounted police In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611131712.kADHCP4l015287@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Moose-Policy - Moose-mounted police https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214266 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-11-13 12:12 EST ------- I know that's what the documentation says, but the %description is a bit suboptimal. How about "Specify project-wide or site-wide Moose meta-policy"? Not that it makes much more sense, but it at least describes what the module does instead of making it sound as if the software joins your computer to the RCMP computing facilities or something. But I'll leave that up to you. * source files match upstream: 11b2e835e4b97563c4e459475bf9df90 Moose-Policy-0.02.tar.gz * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * dist tag is present. * build root is correct. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. License text not included upstream. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * package installs properly * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: perl(Moose::Policy) = 0.02 perl(Moose::Policy::FollowPBP) perl(Moose::Policy::FollowPBP::Attribute) perl(Moose::Policy::JavaAccessors) perl(Moose::Policy::JavaAccessors::Attribute) perl(Moose::Policy::SingleInheritence) perl(Moose::Policy::SingleInheritence::MetaClass) perl-Moose-Policy = 0.02-1.fc7 = perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8) perl(Carp) perl(Moose) perl(Scalar::Util) perl(constant) perl(strict) perl(warnings) * %check is present and all tests pass: All tests successful. Files=9, Tests=95, 2 wallclock secs ( 2.04 cusr + 0.20 csys = 2.24 CPU) * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 13 17:12:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2006 12:12:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215292] Review Request: cups-pdf - Extension for creating pdf-Files with CUPS In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611131712.kADHCxGK015375@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cups-pdf - Extension for creating pdf-Files with CUPS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215292 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-11-13 12:12 EST ------- So the blocker is the source URL? (Just to clarify) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 13 17:25:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2006 12:25:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 212897] Review Request: php-pear-Structures-DataGrid - A tabular structure for converting data In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611131725.kADHPPJA017390@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Structures-DataGrid - A tabular structure for converting data Alias: pear-Structures-DG https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212897 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 13 17:30:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2006 12:30:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214266] Review Request: perl-Moose-Policy - Moose-mounted police In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611131730.kADHUHvD017980@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Moose-Policy - Moose-mounted police https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214266 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-11-13 12:30 EST ------- Summary updated -- RCMP has no jurisdition here ;) Imported and building for devel; branches requested for FC5&6. Thanks for the review! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 13 17:34:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2006 12:34:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 212897] Review Request: php-pear-Structures-DataGrid - A tabular structure for converting data In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611131734.kADHYBEm018476@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Structures-DataGrid - A tabular structure for converting data Alias: pear-Structures-DG https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212897 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-11-13 12:33 EST ------- rpmlint complains about the lack of documentation: W: php-pear-Structures-DataGrid no-documentation but that's the honest truth; this package doesn't have so much as a README file. Which sucks, but there's not much to be done about it. * source files match upstream: bb51347f4b792d733c22f6ffd594766c Structures_DataGrid-0.7.2.tgz * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * dist tag is present. * build root is correct. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. License text not included upstream. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * package installs properly O rpmlint output is acceptable. * final provides and requires are sane: php-pear(Structures_DataGrid) = 0.7.2 php-pear-Structures-DataGrid = 0.7.2-1.fc7 = /bin/sh /usr/bin/pear php-pear(PEAR) * %check is not present; no test suite upstream. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * scriptlets are OK (pear module installation) * code, not content. * No documentation to consider putting in a -docs subpackage. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 13 17:38:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2006 12:38:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215292] Review Request: cups-pdf - Extension for creating pdf-Files with CUPS In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611131738.kADHckvk019200@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cups-pdf - Extension for creating pdf-Files with CUPS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215292 ------- Additional Comments From jeff at ocjtech.us 2006-11-13 12:38 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > So the blocker is the source URL? (Just to clarify) Yes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 13 18:46:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2006 13:46:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 212912] Review Request: php-pear-HTML-QuickForm - Class for creating, validating, processing HTML forms In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611131846.kADIkQNx025484@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-HTML-QuickForm - Class for creating, validating, processing HTML forms Alias: pear-HTML-QuickForm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212912 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 13 18:46:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2006 13:46:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 212916] Review Request: php-pear-DB-DataObject-FormBuilder - Automatically build HTML_QuickForm objects In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611131846.kADIkS9n025512@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-DB-DataObject-FormBuilder - Automatically build HTML_QuickForm objects Alias: DataObj-FormBuilder https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212916 Bug 212916 depends on bug 212912, which changed state. Bug 212912 Summary: Review Request: php-pear-HTML-QuickForm - Class for creating, validating, processing HTML forms https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212912 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|NEW |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 13 19:36:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2006 14:36:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 210285] Review Request: kfolding - KDE kicker applet for Folding@home In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611131936.kADJag99030096@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kfolding - KDE kicker applet for Folding at home https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210285 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163779, 177841 |201449 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 13 20:01:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2006 15:01:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215258] Review Request: clucene - A C++ port of Lucene In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611132001.kADK1LK3032099@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clucene - A C++ port of Lucene https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215258 Jochen at herr-schmitt.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: clucene - A |Review Request: clucene - A |C++ port of Lucene |C++ port of Lucene Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |Jochen at herr-schmitt.de OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From Jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2006-11-13 15:01 EST ------- Good: + Local Build works fine. + Package contains verbain copy of the license. + Mock build works fine. Bad: - Rpmlint complaints on soure RPM: W: clucene non-standard-group Software Development - Rrplint complaints on binary RPM: W: clucene non-standard-group Software Development E: clucene zero-length /usr/share/doc/clucene-0.9.15/ChangeLog E: clucene library-without-ldconfig-postin /usr/lib/libclucene.so.0.0.0 E: clucene library-without-ldconfig-postun /usr/lib/libclucene.so.0.0.0 E: clucene zero-length /usr/share/doc/clucene-0.9.15/NEWS - Rpmlint complaints on devel RPM: W: clucene-devel summary-ended-with-dot Headers for developing programs that will use clucene. E: clucene-devel only-non-binary-in-usr-lib W: clucene-devel no-documentation - Rpmlint complaints on installed RPM: W: clucene non-standard-group Software Development E: clucene zero-length /usr/share/doc/clucene-0.9.15/ChangeLog E: clucene library-without-ldconfig-postin /usr/lib/libclucene.so.0.0.0 E: clucene library-without-ldconfig-postun /usr/lib/libclucene.so.0.0.0 E: clucene zero-length /usr/share/doc/clucene-0.9.15/NEWS - Cant download source from given URL in Source0 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 13 20:41:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2006 15:41:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215038] Review Request: aumix - ncurses based audio mixer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611132041.kADKfGMf002569@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aumix - ncurses based audio mixer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215038 somlo at cmu.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 13 20:45:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2006 15:45:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 212715] Review Request: openvrml - VRML/X3D runtime library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611132045.kADKjnRH003124@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: openvrml - VRML/X3D runtime library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212715 rpm at greysector.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rpm at greysector.net ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2006-11-13 15:45 EST ------- I'm interested in having this in Extras, too. A few comments: 1. redundant BuildRequires: pkgconfig (required by freetype-devel and libpng-devel), libpng-devel (required by cairo-devel, which is required by gtk2-devel), fontconfig-devel (required by cairo-devel), freetype-devel (required by fontconfig-devel) 2. use BuildRequires: gecko-devel instead of firefox-devel and libGLU-devel instead of mesa-libGLU-devel 3. reduntant Requires: mesa-libGLU for -gl subpackage 4. use %setup -q instead of %setup 5. use %configure --disable-dependency-tracking to speed up build process 6. use %{__make} instead of make in %install for consistency 7. avoid unnecessary docs duplication in every subpackage 8. rename mozilla-plugin to plugin -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 13 20:46:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2006 15:46:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 203864] Review Request: tripwire - IDS In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611132046.kADKk8wl003148@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tripwire - IDS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203864 ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2006-11-13 15:46 EST ------- *ping* -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 13 20:46:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2006 15:46:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 212715] Review Request: openvrml - VRML/X3D runtime library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611132046.kADKkumP003219@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: openvrml - VRML/X3D runtime library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212715 ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2006-11-13 15:46 EST ------- BTW: if it's Assigned to you, Ralf, why is the status still NEW? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 13 20:59:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2006 15:59:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 212715] Review Request: openvrml - VRML/X3D runtime library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611132059.kADKxXPh004222@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: openvrml - VRML/X3D runtime library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212715 ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2006-11-13 15:59 EST ------- Judging by the contents of the .pc file, I suggest adding the following for -devel: Requires: freetype-devel Requires: libjpeg-devel Requires: libpng-devel -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 13 21:26:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2006 16:26:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 212715] Review Request: openvrml - VRML/X3D runtime library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611132126.kADLQp1m006303@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: openvrml - VRML/X3D runtime library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212715 ------- Additional Comments From braden at endoframe.com 2006-11-13 16:26 EST ------- (In reply to comment #6) > I'm interested in having this in Extras, too. A few comments: > 1. redundant BuildRequires: pkgconfig (required by freetype-devel and > libpng-devel), libpng-devel (required by cairo-devel, which is required by > gtk2-devel), fontconfig-devel (required by cairo-devel), freetype-devel > (required by fontconfig-devel) Okay. Presumably making openvrml-devel Require freetype-devel would moot Ralf's suggestion that openvrml-devel should Require pkgconfig. > 2. use BuildRequires: gecko-devel instead of firefox-devel and libGLU-devel > instead of mesa-libGLU-devel Re: gecko-devel, I don't think I can do that. I think the change that does need to be made is for openvrml to Require firefox = 1.5.0.8. Note that libopenvrml links with libmozjs, which lives in a versioned subdirectory. Consequently, openvrml-devel would Require firefox-devel = 1.5.0.8. > 3. reduntant Requires: mesa-libGLU for -gl subpackage Why is that redundant? > 4. use %setup -q instead of %setup > 5. use %configure --disable-dependency-tracking to speed up build process > 6. use %{__make} instead of make in %install for consistency Okay. > 7. avoid unnecessary docs duplication in every subpackage Users shouldn't need to be aware of the package dependency chain in order to find the README or license for the package. Would it be acceptable to install symlinks? > 8. rename mozilla-plugin to plugin No. There are lots of kinds of plug-ins. This package makes a Mozilla/Gecko one. I might entertain changing it to "gecko-plugin"; but since "Mozilla plug- in" or "Netscape plug-in" is what everyone calls these things, that's going to be a tough sell. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 13 21:34:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2006 16:34:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214669] Review Request: logserial In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611132134.kADLY6Je006739@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: logserial https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214669 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-11-13 16:33 EST ------- Excellent. That version from comment #4 works fine. The rpm-opt-flags are used. It builds find here on x86_64 and i386. I don't see any further blockers, so this package is APPROVED. Don't forget to close this request NEXTRELEASE once it's been imported and built. Also consider reviewing another waiting package to help spread the reviewing load. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 13 21:41:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2006 16:41:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214818] Review Request: audacious+audacious-plugins - A GTK2 based media player similar to xmms In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611132141.kADLfqlO007642@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: audacious+audacious-plugins - A GTK2 based media player similar to xmms https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214818 ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2006-11-13 16:41 EST ------- (In reply to comment #13) > Hmm. It seems like bugzilla has eaten my reply to comment #8. > > Short version: > Splitting off additional plugins in separate packages is hard because of the > upgrade path, so while I am interested in splitting of packages in general > (and have done so with the new pulseaudio output plugin in the new > audacious-plugins) splitting off plugins which are contained in the current > audacious-1.1.x packages will possibly not happen. Definitely not during this > update. Long version please. I'm not convinced it can't be done. > The -libs subpackage was introduced to prevent circular dependencies between > audacious and audacious-plugins. Ok, but is it necessary for audacious to require audacious-plugins? Granted, it's not usable without them, but it works. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 13 21:51:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2006 16:51:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 212715] Review Request: openvrml - VRML/X3D runtime library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611132151.kADLpnKK008429@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: openvrml - VRML/X3D runtime library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212715 ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2006-11-13 16:51 EST ------- (In reply to comment #9) > (In reply to comment #6) > > I'm interested in having this in Extras, too. A few comments: > > 1. redundant BuildRequires: pkgconfig (required by freetype-devel and > > libpng-devel), libpng-devel (required by cairo-devel, which is required by > > gtk2-devel), fontconfig-devel (required by cairo-devel), freetype-devel > > (required by fontconfig-devel) > > Okay. Presumably making openvrml-devel Require freetype-devel would moot > Ralf's suggestion that openvrml-devel should Require pkgconfig. As a result, yes. > > 2. use BuildRequires: gecko-devel instead of firefox-devel and libGLU-devel > > instead of mesa-libGLU-devel > > Re: gecko-devel, I don't think I can do that. I think the change that does > need to be made is for openvrml to Require firefox = 1.5.0.8. Note that > libopenvrml links with libmozjs, which lives in a versioned subdirectory. > Consequently, openvrml-devel would Require firefox-devel = 1.5.0.8. OK, I guess this is moot, because the only package providing gecko-devel is firefox-devel. > > 3. reduntant Requires: mesa-libGLU for -gl subpackage > > Why is that redundant? $ rpm -qpR openvrml-gl-0.16.1-1.x86_64.rpm ... libGLU.so.1()(64bit) ... $ rpm -q --whatprovides "libGLU.so.1()(64bit)" mesa-libGLU-6.5.1-7.fc6.x86_64 That's why. > > 7. avoid unnecessary docs duplication in every subpackage > > Users shouldn't need to be aware of the package dependency chain in order to > find the README or license for the package. Would it be acceptable to install > symlinks? Well, I'll leave that for Ralf to decide. IMHO people are clueful enough to search in openvrml-%version if they can't find it in openvrml-mozilla-plugin-%version. > > 8. rename mozilla-plugin to plugin > > No. There are lots of kinds of plug-ins. This package makes a Mozilla/Gecko > one. I might entertain changing it to "gecko-plugin"; but since "Mozilla plug- > in" or "Netscape plug-in" is what everyone calls these things, that's going to > be a tough sell. OK. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 13 21:55:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2006 16:55:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 212715] Review Request: openvrml - VRML/X3D runtime library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611132155.kADLtifV008841@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: openvrml - VRML/X3D runtime library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212715 ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2006-11-13 16:55 EST ------- One more thing. Looks like there is a test suite that can be executed using make check. It seems to run properly even if $DISPLAY is not set, so please include it in the specfile, i.e.: %check %{__make} check -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 13 21:58:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2006 16:58:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215258] Review Request: clucene - A C++ port of Lucene In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611132158.kADLwOQ8009121@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clucene - A C++ port of Lucene https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215258 ------- Additional Comments From dakingun at gmail.com 2006-11-13 16:58 EST ------- Thanks for the review Jochen. Have fixed the various issues, new files are here; Spec URL: ftp://czar.eas.yorku.ca/pub/clucene/clucene.spec SRPM URL: ftp://czar.eas.yorku.ca/pub/clucene/clucene-0.9.15-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 13 22:12:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2006 17:12:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213511] Review Request: gxine - Gnome frontend for the xine multimedia library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611132212.kADMCS6L010244@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gxine - Gnome frontend for the xine multimedia library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213511 ------- Additional Comments From michel.salim at gmail.com 2006-11-13 17:12 EST ------- Mola is not currently building the browser plugin; the latest spec I posted, however, does (see attachment #140580 and comment #13) gtk2-devel depends on pango-devel, so pango-devel does not have to be explicitly required. To summarize: Missing BRs: libXext-devel (prevent display blanking during playback. important!) gnome-screensaver (don't ask me why, but it's being detected at compile time) libXaw-devel and nspr-devel (for browser plugin. Also need to symlink to %{_libdir}/mozilla/plugins, and optionally split this into a subpackage) Unnecessary: All the Requires: lines. rpm will add in dependencies on the proper library files necessary, and the versioned dependency for Xine is unnecessary since the lowest version of Xine we ship in Extras is sufficient. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 13 22:12:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2006 17:12:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215185] Review Request: compat-libosip2 - compatability package for libosip2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611132212.kADMCgjs010289@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compat-libosip2 - compatability package for libosip2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215185 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-11-13 17:12 EST ------- 1. Looks good. 2. I think you also still need to have the Obsoletes: as well as the Provides. See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#head-581c3fb3ff1c6ef7404e8b288b59cd5280d75ad6 3. Looks good. 4. Looks good. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 13 22:15:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2006 17:15:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213511] Review Request: gxine - Gnome frontend for the xine multimedia library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611132215.kADMFNdf010451@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gxine - Gnome frontend for the xine multimedia library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213511 ------- Additional Comments From michel.salim at gmail.com 2006-11-13 17:15 EST ------- The --all-name will be usable from the normal %find_lang once redhat-rpm-config is updated, it'll be an easy fix to remove the hardcoding once that takes place. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 13 22:17:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2006 17:17:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 187351] Review Request: bmpx - Media player with the WinAmp GUI In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611132217.kADMH15Z010571@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bmpx - Media player with the WinAmp GUI https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187351 ------- Additional Comments From michel.salim at gmail.com 2006-11-13 17:16 EST ------- That's a shame. bmpx has the nicest Last.fm client for Linux I've seen so far. Are you still going to maintain it in your own repository? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 13 22:17:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2006 17:17:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215292] Review Request: cups-pdf - Extension for creating pdf-Files with CUPS In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611132217.kADMH0Y3010559@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cups-pdf - Extension for creating pdf-Files with CUPS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215292 ------- Additional Comments From Fedora at FamilleCollet.com 2006-11-13 17:16 EST ------- Tanks for the review. Description : I must apologize, I've run rpmlint, but i forget to run it with "LANG=C" so check only apply to French... About permission on cups-pdf, this is explained in the "man backend" (section permissions). Running as root is needed to allow cups-pdf to give (chown) the pdf to the job owner. Spec: http://remi.collet.free.fr/rpms/extras/cups-pdf.spec Srpm: http://remi.collet.free.fr/rpms/extras/cups-pdf-2.4.2-2.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 13 22:34:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2006 17:34:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 188400] Review Request: ssmtp In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611132234.kADMYQrM011399@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ssmtp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188400 wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2006-11-13 17:34 EST ------- FC-5 and FC-6 sucessfully built. Closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 13 23:18:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2006 18:18:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214669] Review Request: logserial In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611132318.kADNIn4d013722@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: logserial https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214669 ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2006-11-13 18:18 EST ------- Thank you, Kevin. Sucessfully built in devel. Will close as soon as FC-5 and FC-6 are built, too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 13 23:36:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2006 18:36:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215444] New: Review Request: netcdf-perl Perl extension module for scientific data access via the netCDF API Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215444 Summary: Review Request: netcdf-perl Perl extension module for scientific data access via the netCDF API Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All URL: http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: orion at cora.nwra.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec Name or Url: http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/netcdf-perl.spec SRPM Name or Url: http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/netcdf-perl-1.2.3-1.fc6.src.rpm Description: The netCDF Perl package is a perl extension module for scientific data access via the netCDF API. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 13 23:38:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2006 18:38:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213511] Review Request: gxine - Gnome frontend for the xine multimedia library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611132338.kADNcNJT014493@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gxine - Gnome frontend for the xine multimedia library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213511 ------- Additional Comments From martin.sourada at seznam.cz 2006-11-13 18:38 EST ------- (In reply to comment #22) > Mola is not currently building the browser plugin; the latest spec I posted, > however, does (see attachment #140580 [edit] and comment #13) Sorry, I overlooked the attachment. > gtk2-devel depends on pango-devel, so pango-devel does not have to be explicitly > required. Also overlooked. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 13 23:46:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2006 18:46:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215445] New: Review Request: netcdf-decoder Converts WMO GRIB products into NetCDF files Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215445 Summary: Review Request: netcdf-decoder Converts WMO GRIB products into NetCDF files Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All URL: http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: orion at cora.nwra.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec Name or Url: http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/netcdf-decoders.spec SRPM Name or Url: http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/netcdf-decoders-4.1.4-1.fc6.src.rpm Description: The NetCDF Decoders package converts WMO GRIB products and textual bulletins into NetCDF formatted files. This package usually works in conjunction with the LDM package to covert incoming products to the NetCDF format without the need to store the raw data. The gribtonc decoder converts most models in the GRIB format. There are perl decoders for the following textual report types: METAR, buoy, upper air, and synoptic products. This package requires the installation of NetCDF, UDUNITS, and the Perl-NetCDF packages to work. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 13 23:46:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2006 18:46:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215444] Review Request: netcdf-perl Perl extension module for scientific data access via the netCDF API In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611132346.kADNkVMB014940@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: netcdf-perl Perl extension module for scientific data access via the netCDF API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215444 orion at cora.nwra.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |215445 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 14 01:29:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2006 20:29:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215292] Review Request: cups-pdf - Extension for creating pdf-Files with CUPS In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611140129.kAE1TZUd018766@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cups-pdf - Extension for creating pdf-Files with CUPS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215292 jeff at ocjtech.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jeff at ocjtech.us 2006-11-13 20:29 EST ------- APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 14 01:39:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2006 20:39:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 212715] Review Request: openvrml - VRML/X3D runtime library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611140139.kAE1dYG4019302@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: openvrml - VRML/X3D runtime library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212715 rc040203 at freenet.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2006-11-13 20:39 EST ------- (In reply to comment #9) > (In reply to comment #6) > > I'm interested in having this in Extras, too. A few comments: > > 1. redundant BuildRequires: pkgconfig (required by freetype-devel and > > libpng-devel), libpng-devel (required by cairo-devel, which is required by > > gtk2-devel), fontconfig-devel (required by cairo-devel), freetype-devel > > (required by fontconfig-devel) > > Okay. Presumably making openvrml-devel Require freetype-devel would moot Ralf's > suggestion that openvrml-devel should Require pkgconfig. Any package that contains a *.pc MUST directly "Require: pkgconfig" to make sure %{_libdir}/pkgconfig has an owner. > > 2. use BuildRequires: gecko-devel instead of firefox-devel I fail to understand this. > > 4. use %setup -q instead of %setup Optional. > > 5. use %configure --disable-dependency-tracking to speed up build process Optional, left to the packager's preference. This doesn't make much sense for this package, because this speed up is marginal for this package. > > 7. avoid unnecessary docs duplication in every subpackage > > Users shouldn't need to be aware of the package dependency chain in order to > find the README or license for the package. Would it be acceptable to install > symlinks? No. > > 8. rename mozilla-plugin to plugin > > No. There are lots of kinds of plug-ins. This package makes a Mozilla/Gecko > one. I might entertain changing it to "gecko-plugin"; but since "Mozilla plug- > in" or "Netscape plug-in" is what everyone calls these things, that's going to > be a tough sell. ACK. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 14 02:05:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2006 21:05:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215185] Review Request: compat-libosip2 - compatability package for libosip2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611140205.kAE25bMv020358@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compat-libosip2 - compatability package for libosip2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215185 ------- Additional Comments From jeff at ocjtech.us 2006-11-13 21:05 EST ------- Ah... I knew that the provides/obosletes thing was documented *somewhere*... Spec URL: http://repo.ocjtech.us/misc/fedora/6/SRPMS/compat-libosip2-2.2.2-8.fc6.spec SRPM URL: http://repo.ocjtech.us/misc/fedora/6/SRPMS/compat-libosip2-2.2.2-8.fc6.src.rpm * Mon Nov 13 2006 Jeffrey C. Ollie - 2.2.2-8 - Add Obsoletes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 14 02:27:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2006 21:27:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214872] Review Request: Ri-li - Arcade game where you drive a toy wood engine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611140227.kAE2R2QI021247@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Ri-li - Arcade game where you drive a toy wood engine Alias: Ri-li https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214872 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2006-11-13 21:26 EST ------- ==== REVIEW CHECKLIST ==== - rpmlint output clean - package named according to package naming guidelines - spec filename matches %{name} - package meets packaging guidelines - package licensed with open source compatible license - license matches actual license - license file included in %doc - spec written in American english - spec legible - sources match upstream e6dfa35616f5c84eb14ff82517cea796 Ri-li-2.0.0.tar.bz2 - package successfully compiles and builds on FC6 x86_64 - all build dependencies are listed in BR - package does not use locales - no shared libraries - package is not relocatable - package owns all directories it creates - no duplicates in %files - file permissions set properly - contains proper %clean - macro usage consistent - contains code - no large documentation files - %doc does not affect runtime - no header files or static libraries - no pkgconfig files - no need for devel subpackage - no .la files - contains proper .desktop file - package does not own files or directories owned by other packages APPROVED ==== SHOULD ==== - Remove SDL-devel from BR, SDL_Mixer-devel should pick it up -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 14 02:31:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2006 21:31:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 212715] Review Request: openvrml - VRML/X3D runtime library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611140231.kAE2VPtL021416@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: openvrml - VRML/X3D runtime library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212715 ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2006-11-13 21:31 EST ------- I tried actually using it and it seems that the firefox plugin requires -gtkplug subpackage to run at all. Also, it's extremely slow without hardware accelerated OpenGL, but that's to be expected. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 14 03:05:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2006 22:05:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 200700] Review Request: clipsmm - A C++ interface to the CLIPS library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611140305.kAE35s80022629@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clipsmm - A C++ interface to the CLIPS library Alias: clipsmm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200700 ------- Additional Comments From rvinyard at cs.nmsu.edu 2006-11-13 22:05 EST ------- Sorry about that. You're right. The one I uploaded turned out to be from an earlier test just before I pushed the release on SF. I used spectool to pull down the tarball from SF just after the release, but failed to copy to SOURCES before rebuilding. Anyway, there is a new SRPM at the same location built from the SF tarball. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 14 03:44:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2006 22:44:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 207472] Review Request: ruby-activesupport - Utility classes and extension to Ruby's standard library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611140344.kAE3iLqt025486@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-activesupport - Utility classes and extension to Ruby's standard library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207472 dlutter at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From dlutter at redhat.com 2006-11-13 22:44 EST ------- Thanks for the review. Nice catch with the irb dependency, I added it to the specfile (though it kinda irks me that that is needed for essentially a dev tool, but I don't feel that separating that into another package is really worth it) Imported and built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 14 03:44:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2006 22:44:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 207473] Review Request: ruby-activerecord - Implements the ActiveRecord pattern for ORM In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611140344.kAE3ipkn025536@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-activerecord - Implements the ActiveRecord pattern for ORM https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207473 Bug 207473 depends on bug 207472, which changed state. Bug 207472 Summary: Review Request: ruby-activesupport - Utility classes and extension to Ruby's standard library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207472 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 14 04:06:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2006 23:06:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 212924] Review Request: php-pear-Structures-DataGrid-DataSource-Array - DataSource driver using arrays In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611140406.kAE46TU2027198@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Structures-DataGrid-DataSource-Array - DataSource driver using arrays Alias: DG-DS-Array https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212924 Bug 212924 depends on bug 212897, which changed state. Bug 212897 Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Structures-DataGrid - A tabular structure for converting data https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212897 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 14 04:06:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2006 23:06:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 212897] Review Request: php-pear-Structures-DataGrid - A tabular structure for converting data In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611140406.kAE46GoO027154@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Structures-DataGrid - A tabular structure for converting data Alias: pear-Structures-DG https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212897 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2006-11-13 23:06 EST ------- Package is still beta, there is documentation on the web site. Thanks for the review! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 14 04:06:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2006 23:06:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 212919] Review Request: php-pear-Structures-DataGrid-DataSource-DataObject - DataSource driver using PEAR::DB_DataObject In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611140406.kAE46efw027215@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Structures-DataGrid-DataSource-DataObject - DataSource driver using PEAR::DB_DataObject Alias: DG-DataSource-DO https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212919 Bug 212919 depends on bug 212897, which changed state. Bug 212897 Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Structures-DataGrid - A tabular structure for converting data https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212897 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 14 04:06:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2006 23:06:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 212898] Review Request: php-pear-Structures-DataGrid-Renderer-Pager - Renderer driver using PEAR::Pager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611140406.kAE46fvx027224@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Structures-DataGrid-Renderer-Pager - Renderer driver using PEAR::Pager Alias: DG-Renderer-Pager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212898 Bug 212898 depends on bug 212897, which changed state. Bug 212897 Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Structures-DataGrid - A tabular structure for converting data https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212897 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 14 04:06:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2006 23:06:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 212925] Review Request: php-pear-Structures-DataGrid-DataSource-RSS - DataSource driver using RSS files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611140406.kAE46fZ5027234@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Structures-DataGrid-DataSource-RSS - DataSource driver using RSS files Alias: DG-DS-RSS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212925 Bug 212925 depends on bug 212897, which changed state. Bug 212897 Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Structures-DataGrid - A tabular structure for converting data https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212897 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 14 04:09:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2006 23:09:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213432] Review Request: kaffeine - Xine-based media player In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611140409.kAE49qmN027540@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kaffeine - Xine-based media player https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213432 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-11-13 23:09 EST ------- importing... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 14 04:16:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2006 23:16:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 212715] Review Request: openvrml - VRML/X3D runtime library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611140416.kAE4GfCZ028185@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: openvrml - VRML/X3D runtime library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212715 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2006-11-13 23:16 EST ------- (In reply to comment #13) > I tried actually using it and it seems that the firefox plugin requires -gtkplug > subpackage to run at all. I don't understand what you are trying to say. Rpm-wise, the mozilla-plugin already depends on the *-gtkplug package. (In reply to comment #7) > BTW: if it's Assigned to you, Ralf, why is the status still NEW? Because bugzilla hadn't changed it, when I assigned it to me? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 14 04:22:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2006 23:22:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 211626] Review Request: xtide - Calculate tide all over the world In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611140422.kAE4MRV6028688@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xtide - Calculate tide all over the world https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211626 ------- Additional Comments From dave at flaterco.com 2006-11-13 23:22 EST ------- I will split out libtcd as a separate tarball and make it build as a shared lib if a GNU/Linux environment is present. (XTide still tries to be portable to Solaris, HP-UX and others, but I have no prayer of guessing the syntax to build shared libs on every platform.) Previous transgressions notwithstanding, as of now, the libtcd version numbering convention is intended to be compatible with the shared library interpretation of soname = major rev = incompatible API, except for the COMPAT114 option. For that, I'm thinking that COMPAT114 could be made a configure option, and if enabled, the shared library is not built at all. It should also add a visible qualifier to the version string produced by the library. I will change the XTide configure script to test for existence of libtcd and barf if a compatible version isn't found. I have pinged the guy who promised to fix up the configure scripts. However that works out, I will look at the build patches attached here and see what changes I should incorporate. As for tideEditor, upon further review I think probably it should be made a separate tarball too, separate from XTide and separate from the other tcd-utils. It is the only thing here that requires Qt, and it is not on the same maintenance schedule as XTide at all, nor is it especially connected to the other tcd-utils except by historical reasons. It will be a pain updating all the references to tcd-utils but it seems like the right thing to do. Does that address everything? I hope there are no imminent deadlines looming. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 14 04:28:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2006 23:28:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 211626] Review Request: xtide - Calculate tide all over the world In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611140428.kAE4Sh1Y029168@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xtide - Calculate tide all over the world https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211626 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2006-11-13 23:28 EST ------- (In reply to comment #81) > I will split out libtcd as a separate tarball and make it build as a > shared lib if a GNU/Linux environment is present. (XTide still tries > to be portable to Solaris, HP-UX and others, but I have no prayer of > guessing the syntax to build shared libs on every platform.) Using libtool should solve this problem for you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 14 07:30:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2006 02:30:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 207793] Review Request: flite - Small, fast speech synthesis engine (text-to-speech) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611140730.kAE7UIia003502@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: flite - Small, fast speech synthesis engine (text-to-speech) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207793 ------- Additional Comments From faucamp at csir.co.za 2006-11-14 02:30 EST ------- Ok, I modified the alsa patch; it now only patches configure.in, and calls autoconf during %build: Spec URL: http://dialogpalette.sourceforge.net/extras/fedora/flite.spec SRPM URL: http://dialogpalette.sourceforge.net/extras/fedora/flite-1.3-7.src.rpm Changes: - Modified alsa support patch file to patch "configure.in" instead of "configure" - Added "autoconf" step to %build - Added BuildRequires: autoconf - Fixed patch backup file suffixes - Renamed patch files to a more standard format - Moved header files from /usr/include to /usr/include/flite - Added -p option to all cp operations (to preserve timestamps) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 14 07:34:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2006 02:34:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214872] Review Request: Ri-li - Arcade game where you drive a toy wood engine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611140734.kAE7YJ0i003728@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Ri-li - Arcade game where you drive a toy wood engine Alias: Ri-li https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214872 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-11-14 02:34 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > > ==== SHOULD ==== > - Remove SDL-devel from BR, SDL_Mixer-devel should pick it up > Done. Thanks for the review, imported and build, closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 14 07:44:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2006 02:44:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 212715] Review Request: openvrml - VRML/X3D runtime library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611140744.kAE7iJCd004151@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: openvrml - VRML/X3D runtime library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212715 ------- Additional Comments From braden at endoframe.com 2006-11-14 02:44 EST ------- (In reply to comment #11) > One more thing. Looks like there is a test suite that can be executed using make > check. It seems to run properly even if $DISPLAY is not set, so please include > it in the specfile, i.e.: > > %check > %{__make} check Except there's a crash-on-exit bug lurking somewhere that one of the test cases triggers *some* of the time. (In reply to comment #12) > Any package that contains a *.pc MUST directly "Require: pkgconfig" to make sure > %{_libdir}/pkgconfig has an owner. Understood. > > > 2. use BuildRequires: gecko-devel instead of firefox-devel > I fail to understand this. Not sure I do either; but for the reason I already mentioned, I think it's moot. > > > 4. use %setup -q instead of %setup > Optional. What's it do? > > > 5. use %configure --disable-dependency-tracking to speed up build process > > Optional, left to the packager's preference. This doesn't make much sense for > this package, because this speed up is marginal for this package. True; I won't bother with it, at least for now. > > > 7. avoid unnecessary docs duplication in every subpackage > > > > Users shouldn't need to be aware of the package dependency chain in order to > > find the README or license for the package. Would it be acceptable to install > > symlinks? > No. Okay. I'll leave it as-is. (In reply to comment #13) > I tried actually using it and it seems that the firefox plugin requires -gtkplug > subpackage to run at all. Yes; there *is* a Requires to that effect. > Also, it's extremely slow without hardware accelerated > OpenGL, but that's to be expected. There's also a bug that makes the plug-in soak up CPU cycles, which doesn't help matters. *** spec: http://endoframe.com/openvrml.spec srpm: http://endoframe.com/openvrml-0.16.1-3.src.rpm I hope I haven't missed anything. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 14 07:59:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2006 02:59:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 212715] Review Request: openvrml - VRML/X3D runtime library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611140759.kAE7x3uD004921@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: openvrml - VRML/X3D runtime library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212715 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2006-11-14 02:58 EST ------- (In reply to comment #15) > (In reply to comment #11) > > > > 4. use %setup -q instead of %setup > > Optional. > > What's it do? -q silences the untarring of source tarball (tar xf instead of tar xvf). As verbose untarring increases the size of log files, some people prefer "%setup -q". However given the size of the log files building openvrml produces, this probably is negligible ;) > > > > 5. use %configure --disable-dependency-tracking to speed up build process > > > > Optional, left to the packager's preference. This doesn't make much sense for > > this package, because this speed up is marginal for this package. > > True; I won't bother with it, at least for now. OK with me. > > > > 7. avoid unnecessary docs duplication in every subpackage > > > > > > Users shouldn't need to be aware of the package dependency chain in order to > > > find the README or license for the package. Would it be acceptable to install > > > symlinks? > > No. > > Okay. I'll leave it as-is. Feel free to do as you like. Rule of thumb should be "docs should accompany those components they document" and "ship them when you feel it's necessary". You're the upstream author, so feel free to add "ChangeLogs", READMEs, License files where you feel them to be appropriate. > spec: http://endoframe.com/openvrml.spec > srpm: http://endoframe.com/openvrml-0.16.1-3.src.rpm > > I hope I haven't missed anything. Will try to look into this later today. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 14 08:28:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2006 03:28:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215444] Review Request: netcdf-perl Perl extension module for scientific data access via the netCDF API In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611140828.kAE8S6n3006573@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: netcdf-perl Perl extension module for scientific data access via the netCDF API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215444 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |pertusus at free.fr OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 14 08:37:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2006 03:37:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214818] Review Request: audacious+audacious-plugins - A GTK2 based media player similar to xmms In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611140837.kAE8bpU7007378@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: audacious+audacious-plugins - A GTK2 based media player similar to xmms https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214818 ------- Additional Comments From redhat-bugzilla at camperquake.de 2006-11-14 03:37 EST ------- (In reply to comment #14) > Long version please. I'm not convinced it can't be done. I do not say that it can not be done. I say that I do not think that it is worth all the trouble it will bring. > Ok, but is it necessary for audacious to require audacious-plugins? Granted, > it's not usable without them, but it works. If users install a media player they expect it to play media. If users update an existing version of a media player they expect it to play the same media it did before. Breaking this expectations will lead to bug reports (completely unnecessary ones, in my opinion). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 14 09:02:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2006 04:02:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214818] Review Request: audacious+audacious-plugins - A GTK2 based media player similar to xmms In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611140902.kAE92SlI009991@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: audacious+audacious-plugins - A GTK2 based media player similar to xmms https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214818 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-11-14 04:02 EST ------- anyway what i can say right now is that packaging of this package is ok and i found no rpmlint errors and also mock build worked fine. But audacious plugins package failed in mock build it needs libglade as BR. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 14 09:51:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2006 04:51:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215444] Review Request: netcdf-perl Perl extension module for scientific data access via the netCDF API In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611140951.kAE9pBGe014875@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: netcdf-perl Perl extension module for scientific data access via the netCDF API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215444 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-11-14 04:51 EST ------- I already made a package, but never submitted it due to the license issue, see below. I attach a modified spec file: - Avoid using the top-level Makefile for perl - ship the netcdf-2 man page as it is the interface implemented - rename to perl-NetCDF When the top-level Makefile is used for make or make install it isn't a pure_install and it tries to write on the local filesystem. It seems to me that it should be named like any other perl module. It may be worth adding: Provides: netcdf-perl = %{version}-%{release} There is a serious license issue, netcdf-perl isn't OSI compatible because of the following restriction in use (in COPYRIGHT): Further, the user agrees to credit UCAR/Unidata in any publications that result from the use of this software or in any product that includes this software. This was also in the netcdf licence, but UCAR accepted to change it to: Further, UCAR requests that the user credit UCAR/Unidata in any publications that result from the use of this software or in any product that includes this software, although this is not an obligation. (they added although this is not an obligation at my request, because I misunderstood what was the real meaning if 'request'...) So there is no doubt that it is still the OSI-uncompliant license because netcdf-perl was never updated, not because UCAR don't agree to distribute it under the same license than netcdf. However, I think you'll have to contact them for clarification. I don't think there is a need for a new release, a simple mail by UCAR agreeing to distribute netcdf-perl under the same terms than netcdf would be enough, and then you could add the mail and the netcdf licence to the .src.rpm. For the license NetCDF use NetCDF, I think you could use that, if after clarification it is the same licence than NetCDF. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 14 09:52:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2006 04:52:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215444] Review Request: netcdf-perl Perl extension module for scientific data access via the netCDF API In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611140952.kAE9qVcY014984@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: netcdf-perl Perl extension module for scientific data access via the netCDF API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215444 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-11-14 04:52 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=141140) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=141140&action=view) spec file modified and renamed -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 14 09:53:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2006 04:53:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215444] Review Request: netcdf-perl Perl extension module for scientific data access via the netCDF API In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611140953.kAE9rIn0015023@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: netcdf-perl Perl extension module for scientific data access via the netCDF API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215444 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-11-14 04:53 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=141141) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=141141&action=view) netcdf-2 man page -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 14 10:00:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2006 05:00:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 211319] Review Request: andutteye-client - Andutteye Software Suite Monitoring agent In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611141000.kAEA06Ll015319@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: andutteye-client - Andutteye Software Suite Monitoring agent https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211319 ------- Additional Comments From faucamp at csir.co.za 2006-11-14 05:00 EST ------- A quick review of the spec file (I have not installed this application yet): - The spec file has strange file permissions (750); should be 644 - spec file naming incorrect; should only be "anduttey-client.spec" SPEC FILE INNARDS: - spec file format is a bit messy: use "rpmdev-newspec" available from rpmdevtools in Extras to create a template - Packager tag should not be present - "AutoReqProv: no" is present; why? Under normal circumstances this should never be used. - License: GPL v2 - should just be GPL (the "v2" not necessary) - Invalid Group: System Environment/Applications --- should be Applications/System - Release tag is invalid: no %{?dist} tag present - Vendor tag should not be present (set by Fedora buildsys) - Inconsistent use of RPM_BUILD_ROOT tags, see: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-f3d77b27a5d29dfc1f5600ef3fc836f2e317badf - %pre and %post scripts are too long, and incorrect (chkconfig and user parts; I haven't checked the anduttey-specifc stuff): see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-220f87f993c84311859884f2a033a8706a2c7d7c ------- For instance: # Registering services if [ -f "/sbin/chkconfig" ] then /sbin/chkconfig --level 3 andutteyed on /sbin/chkconfig --level 5 andutteyed on fi This should be placed in the andutteyed init.d script as defaults for chkconfig, and should not be managed by your spec file. Your specfile can then simply register the service with something like: /sbin/chkconfig --add andutteyed - %install section: no build root cleanup --- %install section: install procedure seems to simply dump everything in the buildroot. Also: Refrain from using /opt; rather use standard directories. Place executable binaries in /usr/bin (using macros such as %{buildroot}%{_bindir}, etc --- %pre and %post scripts create new user account and starts/stops service, but there is no %preun and %postun to "remove" these effects on the system, so the package is never cleanly uninstalled --- %files: section is messy; you can use %defattr much more effectively and remove most of the %attr statements --- %files: your are using hard-coded paths (e.g. /usr/share/man/man1/*); use macros instead --- Changelog inconsistent with release tag This spec file needs a lot of work. I am also unsure of the requirements of this package -- does it require the anduttey-server package (which is on the upstream website)? If this package isn't useful without the -server package, it might be a good idea to first add the -server to Fedora Extras. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 14 10:07:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2006 05:07:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 211319] Review Request: andutteye-client - Andutteye Software Suite Monitoring agent In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611141007.kAEA70Vm015724@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: andutteye-client - Andutteye Software Suite Monitoring agent https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211319 ------- Additional Comments From faucamp at csir.co.za 2006-11-14 05:06 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > package -- does it require the anduttey-server package (which is on the upstream > website)? If this package isn't useful without the -server package, it might be > a good idea to first add the -server to Fedora Extras. Aah, sorry, didn't read your description properly; I see there's a "standalone" mode. Please ignore that comment. :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 14 10:16:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2006 05:16:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 211319] Review Request: andutteye-client - Andutteye Software Suite Monitoring agent In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611141016.kAEAGvTj016231@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: andutteye-client - Andutteye Software Suite Monitoring agent https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211319 faucamp at csir.co.za changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |faucamp at csir.co.za ------- Additional Comments From faucamp at csir.co.za 2006-11-14 05:16 EST ------- Some more things (note, I have not yet installed this package): * package builds in mock (FC6, i386) * rpmlint output: W: andutteye-client summary-ended-with-dot Andutteye Software Suite Monitoting agent. W: andutteye-client spelling-error-in-description availble available E: andutteye-client description-line-too-long Andutteye-client the client part of Andutteye Software Suite Monitoring solution. E: andutteye-client description-line-too-long With the andutteye client you can monitor your operatingsystem, retrive statistics E: andutteye-client description-line-too-long can be used in standalone mode or connected to a Andutteye Software Suite server W: andutteye-client non-standard-group System Environment/Applications W: andutteye-client no-version-in-last-changelog W: andutteye-client invalid-license GPL v2 W: andutteye-client conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/profile.d/aesurveillance.sh E: andutteye-client non-standard-uid /opt/andutteye/bin andutteye E: andutteye-client non-standard-gid /opt/andutteye/bin andutteye E: andutteye-client dir-or-file-in-opt /opt/andutteye/bin E: andutteye-client non-standard-dir-perm /opt/andutteye/bin 0770 E: andutteye-client non-standard-uid /opt/andutteye/var andutteye E: andutteye-client non-standard-gid /opt/andutteye/var andutteye E: andutteye-client dir-or-file-in-opt /opt/andutteye/var E: andutteye-client non-standard-dir-perm /opt/andutteye/var 0770 E: andutteye-client non-standard-uid /opt/andutteye/backbone/andutteye-api-aix.pl andutteye .... [snip] ..... (its very long) These need to be addressed. Most of rpmlint's issues have to do with the points I mentioned in comment #2. To add to that: - no %doc is present in %files. This should *at least* include the LICENSE file (with correct permissions) that is included in the source tarball; adding the README is a good idea also ;-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 14 10:55:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2006 05:55:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215160] Review Request: perl-Set-Scalar - Basic set operations In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611141055.kAEAtY24019090@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Set-Scalar - Basic set operations https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215160 jpo at di.uminho.pt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From jpo at di.uminho.pt 2006-11-14 05:55 EST ------- Thanks for the review. Package imported and built for FC-5, FC-6, and devel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 14 11:12:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2006 06:12:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 209259] Review Request: beryl-core - Beryl OpenGL window and compositing manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611141112.kAEBCvZI020514@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: beryl-core - Beryl OpenGL window and compositing manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209259 ------- Additional Comments From palliv at gmail.com 2006-11-14 06:12 EST ------- Is there any chance of keeping the 0.1.1 binary packages in the repository? Since 0.1.1 was working great for me I had no worries that 0.1.2 would be just a good, but it isn't and the bugs I am having are set to low priority. I tried to get the old source rpms to compile without luck. I'm sorry if this is the wrong venue for making this request. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 14 11:21:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2006 06:21:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 168690] Review Request: pyBackPack (GTK+ Python backup tool) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611141121.kAEBLpQp020902@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyBackPack (GTK+ Python backup tool) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=168690 ------- Additional Comments From andy at andrewprice.me.uk 2006-11-14 06:21 EST ------- Bernard, the bug in comment #15 has now been fixed in svn. pybackpack now backs up symlinks but doesn't follow them. I'll be making a minor release this week with other changes such as updated calls for the changed nautilusburn API which should make it stop crashing in FC6. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 14 12:26:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2006 07:26:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 211834] Review Request: gaim-libnotify - libnotify notification plugin for gaim In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611141226.kAECQXPn025426@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gaim-libnotify - libnotify notification plugin for gaim https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211834 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-11-14 07:26 EST ------- Okay, for gaim-libnotify, it is okay. As I said in the comment #5, you have to either submit another review request or "pre-"review other person's review requests. Please let me know the bugzilla entry you submitted or pre-reviewed so that I can check it. The other person's review request which are currently blocking FE-NEW can be checked by: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/showdependencytree.cgi?id=FE-NEW&hide_resolved=1 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 14 12:34:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2006 07:34:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 207793] Review Request: flite - Small, fast speech synthesis engine (text-to-speech) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611141234.kAECYlGU026170@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: flite - Small, fast speech synthesis engine (text-to-speech) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207793 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-11-14 07:34 EST ------- Okay!! -------------------------------------------------- This package (flite) is APPROVED by me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 14 12:41:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2006 07:41:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 207793] Review Request: flite - Small, fast speech synthesis engine (text-to-speech) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611141241.kAECfnPB026876@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: flite - Small, fast speech synthesis engine (text-to-speech) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207793 ------- Additional Comments From faucamp at csir.co.za 2006-11-14 07:41 EST ------- Thanks for the review. Will just add the "package fails parallel make" comment which I forgot, bump the release, import the package and queue a build. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 14 13:35:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2006 08:35:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 212715] Review Request: openvrml - VRML/X3D runtime library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611141335.kAEDZcRL030762@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: openvrml - VRML/X3D runtime library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212715 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2006-11-14 08:35 EST ------- (In reply to comment #16) > > I hope I haven't missed anything. Unfortunately, you did :( > Will try to look into this later today. Some MUSTFIXES remain: * Some %post/%pre sections still lack a blank line at their end. * The infos do not install/uninstall correctly: - "info openvrml-gtkplug" doesn't jump to the corresponding info pages - "rpm -e openvrml-gtkplug" fails: install-info: warning: no entries found for `/usr/share/info/openvrml-gtkplug.info.gz'; nothing deleted The origin is a missing direntry inside of the *.info (cf. the openvrml-gtkplug entry in /usr/share/info/dir after installing the rpm). Normally this indicates broken/incomplete texinfo sources. Standard work-around would be to either patch/fix the sources, or to pass the necessary info to install-info inside of the specs. RECOMMENDATION: * I recommend using %{?dist} in %release. In your case this would be Release: 3%{?dist} This eases a package's maintenance in longer terms. There exist other minor issue, which IMO don't have to be addressed now and are better be addressed after importing the packaging in FE. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 14 14:22:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2006 09:22:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215444] Review Request: netcdf-perl Perl extension module for scientific data access via the netCDF API In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611141422.kAEEMXQM002660@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: netcdf-perl Perl extension module for scientific data access via the netCDF API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215444 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-11-14 09:22 EST ------- Forgot to say that it would be nice to have src/perl/test.pl in %doc. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 14 14:58:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2006 09:58:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 203864] Review Request: tripwire - IDS In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611141458.kAEEwGtD005996@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tripwire - IDS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203864 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at theholbrooks.org 2006-11-14 09:58 EST ------- I'm here... I've just been putting my time into other FE pursuits. I'll try to address these issues tonight. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 14 15:37:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2006 10:37:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 211626] Review Request: xtide - Calculate tide all over the world In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611141537.kAEFbOc9009836@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xtide - Calculate tide all over the world https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211626 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-11-14 10:37 EST ------- Okay, I keep watching for xtide repackaging by upstream (again, thanks to David for joining this bugzilla ticket). I will repackage xtide again when some repackaing changes are done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 14 15:38:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2006 10:38:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 203520] Review Request: evolution-brutus In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611141538.kAEFcsDA009941@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: evolution-brutus Alias: evolution-brutus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203520 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-11-14 10:38 EST ------- Any trouble occurring to you? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 14 15:40:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2006 10:40:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 211336] Review Request: adesklets - A simple architecture for desktop applets In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611141540.kAEFe02w010093@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: adesklets - A simple architecture for desktop applets Alias: adeskets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211336 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-11-14 10:39 EST ------- Now I am alive and I will check the new srpm when you upload it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 14 15:42:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2006 10:42:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213600] Review Request: tinyca2 - Simple graphical userinterface to manage a small CA In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611141542.kAEFgNgh010376@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tinyca2 - Simple graphical userinterface to manage a small CA https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213600 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-11-14 10:42 EST ------- Don't forget to close this bug when rebuilds are done successfully. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 14 16:00:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2006 11:00:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 198562] Review Request: zabbix - Open-source monitoring solution for your IT infrastructure In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611141600.kAEG0GCF012119@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: zabbix - Open-source monitoring solution for your IT infrastructure https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198562 ------- Additional Comments From jwilson at redhat.com 2006-11-14 11:00 EST ------- Eep, now Zabbix 1.1.3 is out, and I've been slacking on this package... Its not entirely pretty to do this conditionally, as only one or the other can be enabled, but I've set up the default build to use mysql, and if '--with postgresql' is passed in, it'll build with postgresql instead. Didn't bother with a '--with mysql' flag, don't want to hassle with what to do if both were passed in. Both mysql and postgresql versions are building fine for me on FC6/x86_64. Updated SRPM: http://wilsonet.com/packages/zabbix/zabbix-1.1.3-1.fc6.src.rpm Updated spec: http://wilsonet.com/packages/zabbix/zabbix.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 14 16:50:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2006 11:50:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 211807] Review Request: firefox2 - Mozilla Firefox 2.0 Web browser for FC6 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611141650.kAEGoH6W016877@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: firefox2 - Mozilla Firefox 2.0 Web browser for FC6 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211807 ------- Additional Comments From ndbecker2 at gmail.com 2006-11-14 11:50 EST ------- Build fails on FC6 x86_64. /usr/bin/ld: ../../dist/lib/libgkconcvs_s.a(nsCanvasRenderingContext2D.o): relocation R_X86_64_PC32 against `cairo_xlib_surface_create_with_xrender_format' can not be used when making a shared object; recompile with -fPIC /usr/bin/ld: final link failed: Bad value collect2: ld returned 1 exit status gmake[4]: *** [libgklayout.so] Error 1 gmake[4]: Leaving directory `/home/nbecker/RPM/BUILD/mozilla/layout/build' -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 14 17:03:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2006 12:03:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215445] Review Request: netcdf-decoder Converts WMO GRIB products into NetCDF files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611141703.kAEH3HTu018512@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: netcdf-decoder Converts WMO GRIB products into NetCDF files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215445 Jochen at herr-schmitt.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |Jochen at herr-schmitt.de OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From Jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2006-11-14 12:03 EST ------- God: + Rpmlint doesn't complaints source package. + Local build works fine. + rpmlint doesn't complaints binary package. + Mock build works fine. + Tarbar in source RPM matches with upstream. + RPM contains verbatin copy of the license text. + License text seem to be ok for free software Bad: - Can't install becouse perlNetCDF) is required. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 14 17:09:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2006 12:09:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 198562] Review Request: zabbix - Open-source monitoring solution for your IT infrastructure In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611141709.kAEH9pEA019159@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: zabbix - Open-source monitoring solution for your IT infrastructure https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198562 jeff at ocjtech.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jeff at ocjtech.us ------- Additional Comments From jeff at ocjtech.us 2006-11-14 12:09 EST ------- The proper Requires for PostgreSQL support in PHP is "php-pgsql" not "php-postgresql". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 14 17:12:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2006 12:12:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 209259] Review Request: beryl-core - Beryl OpenGL window and compositing manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611141712.kAEHCSj7019420@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: beryl-core - Beryl OpenGL window and compositing manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209259 ------- Additional Comments From jwilson at redhat.com 2006-11-14 12:12 EST ------- (In reply to comment #21) > Is there any chance of keeping the 0.1.1 binary packages in the repository? Sorry, already nuked them. > I tried to get the old source rpms to compile without luck. They should all rebuild just fine with an 'rpmbuild --rebuild .src.rpm', and will tell you if you have missing build requirements. What seems to be the trouble? Note that you may need to downgrade to beryl-core and beryl-core-devel 0.1.1 to build the rest of the packages. > I'm sorry if this is the wrong venue for making this request. Technically, this bug should only be for package review, but thus far, nobody's really doing that... Also, for reference to anyone who might actually do some review (*hint, hint* :), the current latest spec and SRPM are here: http://wilsonet.com/packages/beryl/beryl-core-0.1.2-1.fc6.src.rpm http://wilsonet.com/packages/beryl/beryl-core.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 14 17:17:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2006 12:17:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 198562] Review Request: zabbix - Open-source monitoring solution for your IT infrastructure In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611141717.kAEHHrmF020032@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: zabbix - Open-source monitoring solution for your IT infrastructure https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198562 ------- Additional Comments From jwilson at redhat.com 2006-11-14 12:17 EST ------- D'oh. That's what I get for only build-testing... Fixed, thank you. http://wilsonet.com/packages/zabbix/zabbix-1.1.3-2.fc6.src.rpm http://wilsonet.com/packages/zabbix/zabbix.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 14 17:20:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2006 12:20:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215563] New: Review Request: aquamarine - Themeable window decorator and compositing manager for Beryl Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215563 Summary: Review Request: aquamarine - Themeable window decorator and compositing manager for Beryl Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jwilson at redhat.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://wilsonet.com/packages/beryl/aquamarine.spec SRPM URL: http://wilsonet.com/packages/beryl/aquamarine-0.1.2-1.fc6.src.rpm Description: Aquamarine is themeable window decorator and compositing manager for Beryl. Launch Theme Manager from beryl-manager to change themes. Aquamarine is intended for use with KDE. Depends on beryl-core, submitted for FE-review under bug 209259. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 14 17:21:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2006 12:21:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215564] New: Review Request: bdock - Beryl project's replacement windowmaker dock Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215564 Summary: Review Request: bdock - Beryl project's replacement windowmaker dock Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jwilson at redhat.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://wilsonet.com/packages/beryl/bdock.spec SRPM URL: http://wilsonet.com/packages/beryl/bdock-0.1.2-1.fc6.src.rpm Description: Beryl is a combined window manager and compositing manager that runs on top of Xgl or AIGLX using OpenGL to provide effects accelerated by a 3D graphics card on the desktop. Beryl is a community-driven fork of Compiz. Bdock is a replacement for the windowmaker dock. Depends on beryl-core, submitted for FE-review under bug 209259. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 14 17:27:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2006 12:27:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215568] New: Review Request: beryl-dbus - Beryl OpenGL window and compositing manager dbus plug-in Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215568 Summary: Review Request: beryl-dbus - Beryl OpenGL window and compositing manager dbus plug-in Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jwilson at redhat.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://wilsonet.com/packages/beryl/beryl-dbus.spec SRPM URL: http://wilsonet.com/packages/beryl/beryl-dbus-0.1.2-1.fc6.src.rpm Description: Beryl is a combined window manager and compositing manager that runs on top of Xgl or AIGLX using OpenGL to provide effects accelerated by a 3D graphics card on the desktop. Beryl is a community-driven fork of Compiz. Beryl has a flexible plug-in system, which the contents of this package take advantage of. Depends on beryl-core, submitted for FE-review under bug 209259. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 14 17:29:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2006 12:29:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215569] New: Review Request: beryl-vidcap - Beryl OpenGL window and compositing manager video capture utility Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215569 Summary: Review Request: beryl-vidcap - Beryl OpenGL window and compositing manager video capture utility Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jwilson at redhat.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://wilsonet.com/packages/beryl/beryl-vidcap.spec SRPM URL: http://wilsonet.com/packages/beryl/beryl-vidcap-0.1.2-3.fc6.src.rpm Description: Beryl is a combined window manager and compositing manager that runs on top of Xgl or AIGLX using OpenGL to provide effects accelerated by a 3D graphics card on the desktop. Beryl is a community-driven fork of Compiz. This package provides a utility capable of capturing beryl-enabled desktop sessions as video. Depends on beryl-core, submitted for FE-review under bug 209259. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 14 17:30:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2006 12:30:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215571] New: Review Request: heliodor - Beryl window decorator with Metacity theme support Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215571 Summary: Review Request: heliodor - Beryl window decorator with Metacity theme support Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jwilson at redhat.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://wilsonet.com/packages/beryl/heliodor.spec SRPM URL: http://wilsonet.com/packages/beryl/heliodor-0.1.2-1.fc6.src.rpm Description: Beryl is a combined window manager and compositing manager that runs on top of Xgl or AIGLX using OpenGL to provide effects accelerated by a 3D graphics card on the desktop. Beryl is a community-driven fork of Compiz. Heliodor is a gtk-window-decorator for use with beryl that supports using Metacity themes. Depends on beryl-core, submitted for FE-review under bug 209259. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 14 17:33:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2006 12:33:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 209259] Review Request: beryl-core - Beryl OpenGL window and compositing manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611141733.kAEHXjDr022116@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: beryl-core - Beryl OpenGL window and compositing manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209259 ------- Additional Comments From martin.sourada at seznam.cz 2006-11-14 12:33 EST ------- About your spec: to me it seems fine, only one problem I saw there. You are a bit outdated - source tarballs are available since 7. November. You can get them here: http://releases.beryl-project.org/0.1.2/ Rpmlint output: E: beryl-core library-without-ldconfig-postin /usr/lib/libberylsettings.so.0.0.0 E: beryl-core library-without-ldconfig-postun /usr/lib/libberylsettings.so.0.0.0 You should add to your specfile %post and %postun sections. Something like this: %post /sbin/ldconfig %postun /sbin/ldconfig and add requires: Requires(post): /sbin/ldconfig Requires(postun): /sbin/ldconfig Remember but, that I am NOT a reviewer. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 14 17:38:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2006 12:38:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 208420] Review Request: conky - A system monitor for X originally based on the torsmo code In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611141738.kAEHcUlU022691@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: conky - A system monitor for X originally based on the torsmo code https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208420 ------- Additional Comments From miker5slow at grandecom.net 2006-11-14 12:38 EST ------- OK, this builds fine in mock for fc6, but not on fc5 due to the audacious-devel BR. While I was looking though this new source I found that it includes a vim and nano syntax highlighting files, should I include this into the build as well?? I am pretty sure both editors are installed by default on the system.. what are your thoughts on this?? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 14 17:44:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2006 12:44:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 209259] Review Request: beryl-core - Beryl OpenGL window and compositing manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611141744.kAEHiBUC023336@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: beryl-core - Beryl OpenGL window and compositing manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209259 ------- Additional Comments From jwilson at redhat.com 2006-11-14 12:44 EST ------- Okay, aquamarine, bdock, beryl-dbus, beryl-vidcap and heliodor have all been submitted for review now as well: aquamarine: bug 215563 bdock: bug 215564 beryl-dbus: bug 215568 beryl-vidcap: bug 215569 heliodor: bug 215571 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 14 17:44:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2006 12:44:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215564] Review Request: bdock - Beryl project's replacement windowmaker dock In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611141744.kAEHiT1u023384@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bdock - Beryl project's replacement windowmaker dock https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215564 martin.sourada at seznam.cz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |martin.sourada at seznam.cz ------- Additional Comments From martin.sourada at seznam.cz 2006-11-14 12:44 EST ------- You should probably fix this rpmlint output: E: bdock zero-length /usr/share/doc/bdock-0.1.2/README E: bdock zero-length /usr/share/doc/bdock-0.1.2/ChangeLog -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 14 17:47:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2006 12:47:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215568] Review Request: beryl-dbus - Beryl OpenGL window and compositing manager dbus plug-in In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611141747.kAEHlGu2023663@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: beryl-dbus - Beryl OpenGL window and compositing manager dbus plug-in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215568 ------- Additional Comments From martin.sourada at seznam.cz 2006-11-14 12:47 EST ------- You should probably fix this rpmlint output: E: beryl-dbus zero-length /usr/share/doc/beryl-dbus-0.1.2/AUTHORS -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 14 17:51:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2006 12:51:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215569] Review Request: beryl-vidcap - Beryl OpenGL window and compositing manager video capture utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611141751.kAEHpqje024120@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: beryl-vidcap - Beryl OpenGL window and compositing manager video capture utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215569 martin.sourada at seznam.cz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |martin.sourada at seznam.cz ------- Additional Comments From martin.sourada at seznam.cz 2006-11-14 12:51 EST ------- You should fix this rpmlint output: E: beryl-vidcap binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/lib/beryl/libcapture.so '/build/BUILD/beryl-vidcap-0.1.2/seom/.libs'] W: beryl-vidcap no-documentation E: beryl-vidcap library-without-ldconfig-postin /usr/lib/libseom.so.0.0.0 E: beryl-vidcap library-without-ldconfig-postun /usr/lib/libseom.so.0.0.0 E: beryl-vidcap library-without-ldconfig-postin /usr/lib/libseom.so.0 E: beryl-vidcap library-without-ldconfig-postun /usr/lib/libseom.so.0 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 14 17:55:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2006 12:55:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 209264] Review Request: emerald-themes - Themes for Emerald, the window decorator for Beryl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611141755.kAEHt4TJ024505@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: emerald-themes - Themes for Emerald, the window decorator for Beryl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209264 ------- Additional Comments From martin.sourada at seznam.cz 2006-11-14 12:55 EST ------- You should fix this rpmlint output: E: emerald-themes non-executable-script /usr/share/emerald/themes/import.sh 0644 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 14 18:00:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2006 13:00:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 209259] Review Request: beryl-core - Beryl OpenGL window and compositing manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611141800.kAEI0Q0F025180@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: beryl-core - Beryl OpenGL window and compositing manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209259 ------- Additional Comments From jwilson at redhat.com 2006-11-14 13:00 EST ------- (In reply to comment #23) > About your spec: to me it seems fine, only one problem I saw there. You are a > bit outdated - source tarballs are available since 7. November. You can get them > here: > http://releases.beryl-project.org/0.1.2/ Yep, look in my latest spec file, just haven't changed over to them yet. :) > Rpmlint output: > E: beryl-core library-without-ldconfig-postin /usr/lib/libberylsettings.so.0.0.0 > E: beryl-core library-without-ldconfig-postun /usr/lib/libberylsettings.so.0.0.0 Ugh. Stupid mistake that one. Will be fixed shortly... Okay, -2 build uses upstream tarballs and adds the required ldconfig bits. http://wilsonet.com/packages/beryl/beryl-core-0.1.2-2.fc6.src.rpm http://wilsonet.com/packages/beryl/beryl-core.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 14 18:05:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2006 13:05:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 209259] Review Request: beryl-core - Beryl OpenGL window and compositing manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611141805.kAEI5SEB025892@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: beryl-core - Beryl OpenGL window and compositing manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209259 mr.ecik at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mr.ecik at gmail.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mr.ecik at gmail.com 2006-11-14 13:05 EST ------- I'll do a review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 14 18:06:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2006 13:06:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 209311] Review Request: espeak - Software speech synthesizer (text-to-speech) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611141806.kAEI6rZa026147@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: espeak - Software speech synthesizer (text-to-speech) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209311 faucamp at csir.co.za changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From faucamp at csir.co.za 2006-11-14 13:06 EST ------- Ok, build for FE-devel succeeded; FC-5 and FC-6 building in progress. Closing review request. Thanks to all for helping out during the review! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 14 18:09:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2006 13:09:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 209259] Review Request: beryl-core - Beryl OpenGL window and compositing manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611141809.kAEI95MZ026494@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: beryl-core - Beryl OpenGL window and compositing manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209259 jwilson at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |209261, 209262, 209263, nThis| |209264, 215563, 215564, | |215568, 215569, 215571 ------- Additional Comments From jwilson at redhat.com 2006-11-14 13:09 EST ------- /me cheers! :) (and adds all the other beryl package reviews as being blocked by this bug). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 14 18:09:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2006 13:09:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 209264] Review Request: emerald-themes - Themes for Emerald, the window decorator for Beryl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611141809.kAEI9YXo026613@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: emerald-themes - Themes for Emerald, the window decorator for Beryl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209264 jwilson at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |209259 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 14 18:10:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2006 13:10:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215569] Review Request: beryl-vidcap - Beryl OpenGL window and compositing manager video capture utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611141810.kAEIAVNu026755@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: beryl-vidcap - Beryl OpenGL window and compositing manager video capture utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215569 jwilson at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |209259 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 14 18:10:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2006 13:10:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 209263] Review Request: emerald - Themeable window decorator and compositing manager for Beryl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611141810.kAEIAGZL026700@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: emerald - Themeable window decorator and compositing manager for Beryl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209263 jwilson at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |209259 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 14 18:10:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2006 13:10:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215563] Review Request: aquamarine - Themeable window decorator and compositing manager for Beryl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611141810.kAEIAgXH026776@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aquamarine - Themeable window decorator and compositing manager for Beryl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215563 jwilson at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |209259 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 14 18:10:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2006 13:10:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215564] Review Request: bdock - Beryl project's replacement windowmaker dock In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611141810.kAEIAgTP026780@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bdock - Beryl project's replacement windowmaker dock https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215564 jwilson at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |209259 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 14 18:10:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2006 13:10:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215571] Review Request: heliodor - Beryl window decorator with Metacity theme support In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611141810.kAEIArrL026806@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: heliodor - Beryl window decorator with Metacity theme support https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215571 jwilson at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |209259 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 14 18:11:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2006 13:11:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 209261] Review Request: beryl-settings - Beryl OpenGL window and compositing manager GUI config utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611141811.kAEIB4pG026831@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: beryl-settings - Beryl OpenGL window and compositing manager GUI config utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209261 jwilson at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |209259 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 14 18:11:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2006 13:11:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215568] Review Request: beryl-dbus - Beryl OpenGL window and compositing manager dbus plug-in In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611141811.kAEIBRgb026909@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: beryl-dbus - Beryl OpenGL window and compositing manager dbus plug-in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215568 jwilson at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |209259 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 14 18:11:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2006 13:11:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 209262] Review Request: beryl-plugins - Beryl OpenGL window and compositing manager plug-ins In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611141811.kAEIBcM3026930@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: beryl-plugins - Beryl OpenGL window and compositing manager plug-ins https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209262 jwilson at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |209259 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 14 18:15:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2006 13:15:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215568] Review Request: beryl-dbus - Beryl OpenGL window and compositing manager dbus plug-in In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611141815.kAEIFoqS027474@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: beryl-dbus - Beryl OpenGL window and compositing manager dbus plug-in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215568 ------- Additional Comments From jwilson at redhat.com 2006-11-14 13:15 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > You should probably fix this rpmlint output: > E: beryl-dbus zero-length /usr/share/doc/beryl-dbus-0.1.2/AUTHORS Done, along with switching over to using upstream tarball. http://wilsonet.com/packages/beryl/beryl-dbus-0.1.2-2.fc6.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 14 18:21:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2006 13:21:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 207793] Review Request: flite - Small, fast speech synthesis engine (text-to-speech) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611141821.kAEILboo028029@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: flite - Small, fast speech synthesis engine (text-to-speech) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207793 faucamp at csir.co.za changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From faucamp at csir.co.za 2006-11-14 13:21 EST ------- Package built successfully for FE-devel, FC-5 and FC-6 branches requested. Closing review request. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 14 18:36:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2006 13:36:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 209259] Review Request: beryl-core - Beryl OpenGL window and compositing manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611141836.kAEIadxp029036@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: beryl-core - Beryl OpenGL window and compositing manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209259 ------- Additional Comments From mr.ecik at gmail.com 2006-11-14 13:36 EST ------- MUST items: !* rpmlint output: W: beryl-core-devel no-documentation * package is named well * spec file name is good * package meets Packaging Guidelines * package is licensed with a GPL open-source compatible license * License field in spec file matches actual license * license file is included in %doc * md5sums are matching (045aceb6e48e997c952d942fbe841e76) * package successfully compiles on x86_64 !* BuildRequires aren't listed well * no locales * proper %post and %postun sections * not relocatable * package owns directories well * no duplicates in %files * every %files section includes %defattr * proper %clean section * macros used well !* -devel package created well, but it should include documentation THINGS to do: * you have to remove libsvg-cairo-devel build dependency. Without it package builds successfully and it is .dead since the day before yesterday: http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/*checkout*/devel/libsvg-cairo/ dead.package?root=extras * in most cases rpmlint error should be omitted, but it looks like all man.3 pages have to go to -devel subpackage Just remove libsvg-cairo-devel and change man3 location and package will be approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 14 18:43:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2006 13:43:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215569] Review Request: beryl-vidcap - Beryl OpenGL window and compositing manager video capture utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611141843.kAEIhg4o029539@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: beryl-vidcap - Beryl OpenGL window and compositing manager video capture utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215569 ------- Additional Comments From martin.sourada at seznam.cz 2006-11-14 13:43 EST ------- About the rpath check this: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-a1dfb5f46bf4098841e31a75d833e6e1b3e72544 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 14 18:44:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2006 13:44:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213906] Review Request: Pound - a reverse proxy and load balancer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611141844.kAEIifY3029613@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Pound - a reverse proxy and load balancer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213906 ruben at rubenkerkhof.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 14 18:51:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2006 13:51:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 209259] Review Request: beryl-core - Beryl OpenGL window and compositing manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611141851.kAEIpdRo030121@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: beryl-core - Beryl OpenGL window and compositing manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209259 ------- Additional Comments From jwilson at redhat.com 2006-11-14 13:51 EST ------- (In reply to comment #28) > THINGS to do: > * you have to remove libsvg-cairo-devel build dependency. Without it package > builds successfully and it is .dead since the day before yesterday: > http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/*checkout*/devel/libsvg-cairo/ > dead.package?root=extras Done. > * in most cases rpmlint error should be omitted, but it looks like all man.3 > pages have to go to -devel subpackage Done. > Just remove libsvg-cairo-devel and change man3 location and package will be > approved. http://wilsonet.com/packages/beryl/beryl-core-0.1.2-3.fc6.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 14 19:02:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2006 14:02:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 209260] Review Request: beryl-manager - Beryl window decorator and theme management utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611141902.kAEJ2Ili030835@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: beryl-manager - Beryl window decorator and theme management utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209260 ------- Additional Comments From jwilson at redhat.com 2006-11-14 14:02 EST ------- Latest build, uses upstream tarballs, since they finally started making them: http://wilsonet.com/packages/beryl/beryl-manager-0.1.2-2.fc6.src.rpm As for where to talk about problems with running the software, that would probably be best to take upstream to http://forums.beryl-project.org/, http://bugs.bery-project.org/ or #bery on irc.freenode.net, at least until such time as these packages are actually part of Fedora Extras. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 14 19:02:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2006 14:02:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213906] Review Request: Pound - a reverse proxy and load balancer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611141902.kAEJ2DGY030820@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Pound - a reverse proxy and load balancer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213906 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 14 19:03:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2006 14:03:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 209259] Review Request: beryl-core - Beryl OpenGL window and compositing manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611141903.kAEJ3kLl030942@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: beryl-core - Beryl OpenGL window and compositing manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209259 mr.ecik at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mr.ecik at gmail.com 2006-11-14 14:03 EST ------- It looks fine now. I am very happy to approve it :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 14 19:05:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2006 14:05:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 209261] Review Request: beryl-settings - Beryl OpenGL window and compositing manager GUI config utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611141905.kAEJ5LJf031118@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: beryl-settings - Beryl OpenGL window and compositing manager GUI config utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209261 ------- Additional Comments From jwilson at redhat.com 2006-11-14 14:05 EST ------- Latest build uses upstream tarballs, since they're finally creating them (well, for at least some bits...): http://wilsonet.com/packages/beryl/beryl-settings-0.1.2-2.fc6.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 14 19:15:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2006 14:15:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 209262] Review Request: beryl-plugins - Beryl OpenGL window and compositing manager plug-ins In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611141915.kAEJFFdD031981@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: beryl-plugins - Beryl OpenGL window and compositing manager plug-ins https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209262 ------- Additional Comments From jwilson at redhat.com 2006-11-14 14:15 EST ------- Latest build, using new upstream tarballs: http://wilsonet.com/packages/beryl/beryl-plugins-0.1.2-2.fc6.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 14 19:17:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2006 14:17:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 209263] Review Request: emerald - Themeable window decorator and compositing manager for Beryl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611141917.kAEJHFnt032241@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: emerald - Themeable window decorator and compositing manager for Beryl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209263 ------- Additional Comments From jwilson at redhat.com 2006-11-14 14:17 EST ------- I think I'm leaning toward agreeing that working on these for FC5 isn't the best use of time w/FC6 already out. Once all the packages are accepted into Fedora Extras, perhaps revisit getting them together for FC5 as well. Latest build, using new upstream tarballs: http://wilsonet.com/packages/beryl/emerald-0.1.2-2.fc6.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 14 19:18:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2006 14:18:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 209264] Review Request: emerald-themes - Themes for Emerald, the window decorator for Beryl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611141918.kAEJI4rR032305@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: emerald-themes - Themes for Emerald, the window decorator for Beryl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209264 ------- Additional Comments From jwilson at redhat.com 2006-11-14 14:18 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > You should fix this rpmlint output: > E: emerald-themes non-executable-script /usr/share/emerald/themes/import.sh 0644 > I've removed it from the package entirely, its only needed at build time. That change, plus the switch to the upstream tarball are in the latest build: http://wilsonet.com/packages/beryl/emerald-themes-0.1.2-2.fc6.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 14 19:19:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2006 14:19:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 209311] Review Request: espeak - Software speech synthesizer (text-to-speech) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611141919.kAEJJ3L9032436@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: espeak - Software speech synthesizer (text-to-speech) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209311 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 14 19:43:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2006 14:43:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214234] Review Request: php-pear-Net-DIME - Implements Direct Internet Message Encapsulation (DIME) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611141943.kAEJhZaA001702@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Net-DIME - Implements Direct Internet Message Encapsulation (DIME) Alias: pear-Net-DIME https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214234 Fedora at FamilleCollet.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 14 19:43:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2006 14:43:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214236] Review Request: php-pear-SOAP - Simple Object Access Protocol (SOAP) Client/Server for PHP In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611141943.kAEJhwDR001743@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-SOAP - Simple Object Access Protocol (SOAP) Client/Server for PHP Alias: php-pear-SOAP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214236 Bug 214236 depends on bug 214234, which changed state. Bug 214234 Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Net-DIME - Implements Direct Internet Message Encapsulation (DIME) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214234 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 14 19:57:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2006 14:57:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215569] Review Request: beryl-vidcap - Beryl OpenGL window and compositing manager video capture utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611141957.kAEJvFAl002634@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: beryl-vidcap - Beryl OpenGL window and compositing manager video capture utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215569 ------- Additional Comments From jwilson at redhat.com 2006-11-14 14:57 EST ------- Ugh. I hate this package. And its utterly crappy Makefiles. Latest build works around everything in comment #1, as well as making proper symlinks instead of copying all the libseom .so's. Well, except there's still no documentation, but nothing I can do about that one at the moment, since there is none. :) http://wilsonet.com/packages/beryl/beryl-vidcap-0.1.2-4.fc6.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 14 20:03:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2006 15:03:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215564] Review Request: bdock - Beryl project's replacement windowmaker dock In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611142003.kAEK37JR003059@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bdock - Beryl project's replacement windowmaker dock https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215564 ------- Additional Comments From jwilson at redhat.com 2006-11-14 15:03 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > You should probably fix this rpmlint output: > E: bdock zero-length /usr/share/doc/bdock-0.1.2/README > E: bdock zero-length /usr/share/doc/bdock-0.1.2/ChangeLog Done. http://wilsonet.com/packages/beryl/bdock-0.1.2-2.fc6.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 14 20:11:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2006 15:11:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215185] Review Request: compat-libosip2 - compatability package for libosip2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611142011.kAEKBock003768@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compat-libosip2 - compatability package for libosip2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215185 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-11-14 15:11 EST ------- ok, that looks good. Thats the last blocker that I see... so this package is APPROVED. Please remember to close this NEXTRELEASE once it's been imported and built. Also consider doing a review on another waiting package to help spread out the reviewing load. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 14 20:23:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2006 15:23:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 211319] Review Request: andutteye-client - Andutteye Software Suite Monitoring agent In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611142023.kAEKN9Sj004766@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: andutteye-client - Andutteye Software Suite Monitoring agent https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211319 ------- Additional Comments From andreas.utterberg at thundera.se 2006-11-14 15:23 EST ------- Thanx for the input. I have done my best to correct the spec file to meet your suggestions, hopefully it looks a little better now. Let me know if there are more things that must be corrected. I have uploaded a new specfile for you to validate. Im also planning to add the server, syslog, cache, management packages, but the client package is the smallest, easiest to install and can be used in standalone mode so i thought it could be a good start. http://www.andutteye.com/download/anduttey-client.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 14 20:29:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2006 15:29:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 174290] HDate-applet is an applet to show the hebrew date (calendar) using the libhdate library and the gnome-2.0 graphics library. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611142029.kAEKT3V3005196@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: HDate-applet is an applet to show the hebrew date (calendar) using the libhdate library and the gnome-2.0 graphics library. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174290 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|enhancement |normal Keywords| |FutureFeature fmoquete at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|gdk at redhat.com |tsanders at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From fmoquete at redhat.com 2006-11-14 15:28 EST ------- Reassigning bugs from gdk (old RHN engineering Manager) to tsanders (current RHN engineering manager) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 14 20:33:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2006 15:33:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215165] Review Request: audacious-plugins - Plugins for the Audacious media player In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611142033.kAEKXRgR005917@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: audacious-plugins - Plugins for the Audacious media player https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215165 ------- Additional Comments From redhat-bugzilla at camperquake.de 2006-11-14 15:33 EST ------- New version to fix missing build requires at http://www.skytale.net/files/audacious/ Needs a newer version of audacious as well, available at the same place. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 14 20:33:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2006 15:33:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 176712] Review Request: i386-rtems4.7-gcc-newlib In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611142033.kAEKXqYK005959@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: i386-rtems4.7-gcc-newlib https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176712 fmoquete at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|gdk at redhat.com |tsanders at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From fmoquete at redhat.com 2006-11-14 15:33 EST ------- Reassigning bugs from gdk (old RHN engineering Manager) to tsanders (current RHN engineering manager) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 14 20:36:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2006 15:36:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 174288] Hspell-gui is a graphical front end to hspell In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611142036.kAEKaKSb006452@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Hspell-gui is a graphical front end to hspell https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174288 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|enhancement |normal Keywords| |FutureFeature fmoquete at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|gdk at redhat.com |tsanders at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From fmoquete at redhat.com 2006-11-14 15:36 EST ------- Reassigning bugs from gdk (old RHN engineering Manager) to tsanders (current RHN engineering manager) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 14 20:42:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2006 15:42:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 209259] Review Request: beryl-core - Beryl OpenGL window and compositing manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611142042.kAEKg48Z007380@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: beryl-core - Beryl OpenGL window and compositing manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209259 ------- Additional Comments From jwilson at redhat.com 2006-11-14 15:42 EST ------- Thanks much! Imported into cvs, building now... Will close once I've got an FC6 branch created and built also. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 14 20:42:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2006 15:42:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215444] Review Request: netcdf-perl Perl extension module for scientific data access via the netCDF API In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611142042.kAEKgrYB007593@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: netcdf-perl Perl extension module for scientific data access via the netCDF API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215444 ------- Additional Comments From orion at cora.nwra.com 2006-11-14 15:42 EST ------- Asked about the license on netcdf-perl list and got this: Orion, Your request will be part of the next release. Regards, Steve Emmerson ------- Original Message Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2006 10:20:54 -0700 From: Orion Poplawski To: support at unidata.ucar.edu , netcdf-perl at unidata.ucar.edu Subject: netCDF Perl license As currently distributed, the netCDF Perl license is not OSI compatible because of the following clause: Further, the user agrees to credit UCAR/Unidata in any publications that result from the use of this software or in any product that includes this software. This is a restriction on use and is unacceptable in a truly free distribution like Fedora. The NetCDF license had a similar clause and was changed to: Further, UCAR requests that the user credit UCAR/Unidata in any publications that result from the use of this software or in any product that includes this software, although this is not an obligation. Please consider changing the netCDF Perl license in a similar manner so that it can be packaged as part of Fedora. Thanks! -------------------- So I think we're good there. Changed license NetCDF. New version: http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/netcdf-perl.spec http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/netcdf-perl-1.2.3-2.fc6.src.rpm - I'd rather stick with netcdf-perl as that is the upstream name. - Changed license to NetCDF, will be changed upstream next release - Add src/perl/test.pl to %%doc - Added netcdf-2 man page - Only use top level Makefile for installing man page -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 14 20:44:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2006 15:44:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 174883] Review Request: distcc -- A free distributed C/C++ compiler system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611142044.kAEKiMhm007761@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: distcc -- A free distributed C/C++ compiler system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174883 fmoquete at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|gdk at redhat.com |tsanders at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From fmoquete at redhat.com 2006-11-14 15:44 EST ------- Reassigning bugs from gdk (old RHN engineering Manager) to tsanders (current RHN engineering manager) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 14 20:53:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2006 15:53:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 176582] Review Request: freedt -- Reimplementation of Dan Bernstein's daemontools under the GNU GPL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611142053.kAEKrWbR008920@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: freedt -- Reimplementation of Dan Bernstein's daemontools under the GNU GPL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176582 fmoquete at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|gdk at redhat.com |tsanders at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From fmoquete at redhat.com 2006-11-14 15:53 EST ------- Reassigning bugs from gdk (old RHN engineering Manager) to tsanders (current RHN engineering manager) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 14 20:55:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2006 15:55:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 208420] Review Request: conky - A system monitor for X originally based on the torsmo code In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611142055.kAEKtuEu009204@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: conky - A system monitor for X originally based on the torsmo code https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208420 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-11-14 15:55 EST ------- I don't see a need for glib2, glib, X, twm and hddtemp as buildrequires. conky links against a lot of libraries it doesn't need, all of them are pulled in by audacious.pc. I think audacious.pc is buggy, it should have some Requires.static instead of only Requires. regarding the syntax highlighting files, you can do subpackages which requires the editors, with files installed at the right place, or add them in %doc. I still think that 'originally based on the torsmo code' in summary isn't needed. Also maybe doc/docs.html and doc/conkyrc.sample could be in %doc. rpmlint gives: W: conky macro-in-%changelog configure -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 14 20:56:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2006 15:56:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 174286] hocr is a set of Hebrew character recognition utilities In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611142056.kAEKufuG009377@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: hocr is a set of Hebrew character recognition utilities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174286 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|enhancement |normal Keywords| |FutureFeature fmoquete at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|gdk at redhat.com |tsanders at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From fmoquete at redhat.com 2006-11-14 15:56 EST ------- Reassigning bugs from gdk (old RHN engineering Manager) to tsanders (current RHN engineering manager) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 14 20:57:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2006 15:57:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 174289] LibHdate is a small C, C++ library for Hebrew calendar and dates, holidays, and reading sequence. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611142057.kAEKv7Rd009441@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: LibHdate is a small C,C++ library for Hebrew calendar and dates, holidays, and reading sequence. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174289 fmoquete at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|gdk at redhat.com |tsanders at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From fmoquete at redhat.com 2006-11-14 15:56 EST ------- Reassigning bugs from gdk (old RHN engineering Manager) to tsanders (current RHN engineering manager) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 14 21:30:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2006 16:30:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213511] Review Request: gxine - Gnome frontend for the xine multimedia library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611142130.kAELUrRO013320@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gxine - Gnome frontend for the xine multimedia library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213511 ------- Additional Comments From martin.sourada at seznam.cz 2006-11-14 16:30 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=141188) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=141188&action=view) spec file with mozplugin subpackage I attach my revised specfile. I have fixed fixed all rpmlint errors and warnings, included your logo's patch, edited the spec to follow fedora packaging guidelines, in mozplugin sub-package I created symlink instead of copying the library and I included all optional build dependencies. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 14 21:32:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2006 16:32:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213511] Review Request: gxine - Gnome frontend for the xine multimedia library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611142132.kAELW9H5013419@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gxine - Gnome frontend for the xine multimedia library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213511 martin.sourada at seznam.cz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #141188|application/octet-stream |text/plain mime type| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 14 21:43:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2006 16:43:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 209260] Review Request: beryl-manager - Beryl window decorator and theme management utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611142143.kAELhRsv014165@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: beryl-manager - Beryl window decorator and theme management utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209260 mr.ecik at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mr.ecik at gmail.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mr.ecik at gmail.com 2006-11-14 16:43 EST ------- MUST items: * rpmlint is quiet * package is named well * spec file name is good * package meets Packaging Guidelines * package is licensed with a GPL open-source compatible license * License field in spec file matches actual license * license file is included in %doc * md5sums are matching (50c0235d59369674827ceaec7d36e53b) * package successfully compiles on x86_64 * BuildRequires listed well (mock builds succesfully) * spec file handles locales properly * no need to %post and %postun sections * not relocatable * package owns directories well * no duplicates in %files * every %files section includes %defattr * proper %clean section * macros used well Package looks almost well. I haven't checked the another beryl packages yet, but you use Provides: beryl in beryl-core package and here you're using Requires: beryl-core. Maybe Requires: beryl would be better? And the another thing: if a normal user type `yum install beryl`, he won't get working beryl environment. He'll get only a beryl-core package which alone is useless. Maybe you should create dependencies differently to make possibility to install all essential beryl packages by simply typying `yum install beryl`? How do you think? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 14 22:21:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2006 17:21:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 209260] Review Request: beryl-manager - Beryl window decorator and theme management utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611142221.kAEMLacs017035@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: beryl-manager - Beryl window decorator and theme management utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209260 ------- Additional Comments From jwilson at redhat.com 2006-11-14 17:21 EST ------- (In reply to comment #9) > Package looks almost well. > I haven't checked the another beryl packages yet, but you > use Provides: beryl in beryl-core package and here you're using > Requires: beryl-core. Maybe Requires: beryl would be better? I'm thinking stick with beryl-core in the sub-packages, for the reason below... > And the another thing: if a normal user type `yum install beryl`, > he won't get working beryl environment. He'll get only a beryl-core > package which alone is useless. Maybe you should create dependencies > differently to make possibility to install all essential beryl packages > by simply typying `yum install beryl`? How do you think? I initially did Provides: beryl in beryl-core because it seemed right at the time. It did cross my mind the other day to perhaps switch to a beryl meta-package that Requires: all the beryl components. Only downside with that is that it can suck in a fair amount of stuff now that people may not want if they're running one desktop or another (i.e. kde vs. gnome, where aquamarine Requires: some kde stuff, heliodor Requires: some gnome stuff). Could do three meta-packages, beryl, which in turn Requires: beryl-kde and beryl-gnome, which in turn Requires: packages appropriately for each DE. Some scheme along these lines definitely seems better than beryl-core Provides: beryl, which does indeed provide nothing of use in the case of a user yum installing only beryl. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 14 23:04:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2006 18:04:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 209260] Review Request: beryl-manager - Beryl window decorator and theme management utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611142304.kAEN4n2g019953@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: beryl-manager - Beryl window decorator and theme management utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209260 ------- Additional Comments From mr.ecik at gmail.com 2006-11-14 18:04 EST ------- > I initially did Provides: beryl in beryl-core because it seemed right at the > time. It did cross my mind the other day to perhaps switch to a beryl > meta-package that Requires: all the beryl components. Only downside with that is > that it can suck in a fair amount of stuff now that people may not want if > they're running one desktop or another (i.e. kde vs. gnome, where aquamarine > Requires: some kde stuff, heliodor Requires: some gnome stuff). Could do three > meta-packages, beryl, which in turn Requires: beryl-kde and beryl-gnome, which > in turn Requires: packages appropriately for each DE. It sounds wisely for me, I think it's a good solution. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 15 01:55:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2006 20:55:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 198562] Review Request: zabbix - Open-source monitoring solution for your IT infrastructure In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611150155.kAF1teIY026532@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: zabbix - Open-source monitoring solution for your IT infrastructure https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198562 ------- Additional Comments From cstubbs at gmail.com 2006-11-14 20:55 EST ------- Nice spec Jarod, thanks. There's a few more build/runtime dependencies you probably need to add though. Build: gnutls-devel Runtime: net-snmp-libs The build scripts sometimes can't determine where libgnutls is by default, gnutls-devel includes libgnutls-config which fixes this. Without net-snmp-libs the zabbix_server binary can't load. Usually get's resolved automatically, but given ucd-snmp is now net-snmp and that's what Fedora is packaging, it should be OK to explicitly require net-snmp-libs ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 15 02:03:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2006 21:03:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215659] New: Review Request: python-daap - A DAAP client implemented in Python Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215659 Summary: Review Request: python-daap - A DAAP client implemented in Python Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jeff at ocjtech.us QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://repo.ocjtech.us/misc/fedora/6/SRPMS/python-daap-0.4-1.fc6.spec SRPM URL: http://repo.ocjtech.us/misc/fedora/6/SRPMS/python-daap-0.4-1.fc6.src.rpm Description: A DAAP client implemented in Python. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 15 02:49:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2006 21:49:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 198562] Review Request: zabbix - Open-source monitoring solution for your IT infrastructure In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611150249.kAF2nH31028702@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: zabbix - Open-source monitoring solution for your IT infrastructure https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198562 ------- Additional Comments From jwilson at redhat.com 2006-11-14 21:49 EST ------- Added BR: gnutls-devel and R: net-snmp-libs (yeah, both are the correct thing to do). http://wilsonet.com/packages/zabbix/zabbix-1.1.3-3.fc6.src.rpm http://wilsonet.com/packages/zabbix/zabbix.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 15 03:33:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2006 22:33:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213511] Review Request: gxine - Gnome frontend for the xine multimedia library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611150333.kAF3Xikq030858@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gxine - Gnome frontend for the xine multimedia library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213511 ------- Additional Comments From michel.salim at gmail.com 2006-11-14 22:33 EST ------- Reviewing Martin's: - Summary: gxine does not really use any gnome libraries, so perhaps call it "GTK+ frontend" instead URL does not allow direct download. Change to one of the SF.net download server that does have gxine? (easynews.dl.sourceforge.net works, for instance) For some reason libXrandr and libXtst dependencies are not picked up by RPM, which is strange. Not sure what we need to do about that yet. BuildReqs: Pkgconfig is not explicitly required (all -devel packages that provide a .pc file depends on it) %setup: You need to pass --with-dbus to configure, otherwise support is not turned on by default. --disable-static is optional since it's the default, but good to have, I guess. configure needs to be patched to fix lirc detection on x86_64 - see next comment. Browser plugin: perhaps move it instead of symlinking? %post / %postun: - You need to update the icon cache as well. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 15 03:37:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2006 22:37:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213511] Review Request: gxine - Gnome frontend for the xine multimedia library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611150337.kAF3bNTE031195@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gxine - Gnome frontend for the xine multimedia library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213511 ------- Additional Comments From michel.salim at gmail.com 2006-11-14 22:37 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=141214) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=141214&action=view) Patch to Martin's latest spec Patch to Martin's spec. I'm posting the full spec as well but it's easier to see the differences this way -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 15 03:39:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2006 22:39:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213511] Review Request: gxine - Gnome frontend for the xine multimedia library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611150339.kAF3dTeH031333@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gxine - Gnome frontend for the xine multimedia library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213511 michel.salim at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #140580|0 |1 is obsolete| | Attachment #141188|0 |1 is obsolete| | ------- Additional Comments From michel.salim at gmail.com 2006-11-14 22:39 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=141215) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=141215&action=view) New gxine spec The new spec, with the LIRC patch. Also updates icon cache after (un-)installation, and move browser plugin instead of symlinking -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 15 03:40:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2006 22:40:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213511] Review Request: gxine - Gnome frontend for the xine multimedia library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611150340.kAF3eggE031450@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gxine - Gnome frontend for the xine multimedia library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213511 ------- Additional Comments From michel.salim at gmail.com 2006-11-14 22:40 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=141218) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=141218&action=view) The LIRC patch Replace the /lib /usr/lib /usr/local/lib nonsense with just ${libdir} since that's where Fedora's LIRC is. This also makes it work on x86_64 (libdir=/usr/lib64) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 15 03:43:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2006 22:43:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213511] Review Request: gxine - Gnome frontend for the xine multimedia library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611150343.kAF3hQUq031675@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gxine - Gnome frontend for the xine multimedia library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213511 ------- Additional Comments From michel.salim at gmail.com 2006-11-14 22:43 EST ------- Mola, please have a look at the latest .spec and consider merging in the changes. Let me know if there's any change you don't think should be applied and your reasoning. Thanks! Martin, is gxine still crashing on you? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 15 04:11:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2006 23:11:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 208169] Review Request: python-twisted-core - An asynchronous networking framework written in Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611150411.kAF4BNan001077@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-twisted-core - An asynchronous networking framework written in Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208169 ------- Additional Comments From jeff at ocjtech.us 2006-11-14 23:11 EST ------- Thomas, ping! I'm sure you must be busy but is there a chance that you could import this soon? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 15 04:28:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2006 23:28:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 212715] Review Request: openvrml - VRML/X3D runtime library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611150428.kAF4SvDu002650@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: openvrml - VRML/X3D runtime library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212715 ------- Additional Comments From braden at endoframe.com 2006-11-14 23:28 EST ------- (In reply to comment #17) > (In reply to comment #16) > > > I hope I haven't missed anything. > > Unfortunately, you did :( D'oh. > > Will try to look into this later today. > > Some MUSTFIXES remain: > > * Some %post/%pre sections still lack a blank line at their end. Damn. > * The infos do not install/uninstall correctly: > - "info openvrml-gtkplug" doesn't jump to the corresponding info pages > - "rpm -e openvrml-gtkplug" fails: > install-info: warning: no entries found for > `/usr/share/info/openvrml-gtkplug.info.gz'; nothing deleted > > The origin is a missing direntry inside of the *.info (cf. the openvrml-gtkplug > entry in /usr/share/info/dir after installing the rpm). > Normally this indicates broken/incomplete texinfo sources. > > Standard work-around would be to either patch/fix the sources, or to pass the > necessary info to install-info inside of the specs. I'm stumped here so far. There is a direntry in openvrml-gtkplug.texi; and if there's something wrong with it, it's not apparent to me. I do see the message you're getting upon uninstalling openvrml-gtkplug. If I then try to reinstall it, I get this: install-info: menu item `openvrml-gtkplug' already exists, for file `(none)' error: %post(openvrml-gtkplug-0.16.1-3.x86_64) scriptlet failed, exit status 1 I'll play around with this a bit more; however, if this is not something that can be repaired by passing arguments to install-info, I'm inclined to punt and simply not package the info for 0.16.1. I'll fix it for 0.16.2. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 15 04:37:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2006 23:37:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 210790] Review Request: dar - Collection of scripts for making/restoring CD/DVD backups In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611150437.kAF4bSIh003399@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dar - Collection of scripts for making/restoring CD/DVD backups https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210790 ------- Additional Comments From lists at forevermore.net 2006-11-14 23:37 EST ------- Updated again http://rpm.forevermore.net/dar/dar-2.3.1-3.src.rpm http://rpm.forevermore.net/dar/dar.spec - Fix/standardize Requires/Provides for libdar and libdar-devel - Remove redundant zlib-devel (covered by openssl-devel) - Update README.Fedora with my name/date, as requested in the ticket - Add a patch to fix a funky character in man/dar.1 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 15 04:43:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2006 23:43:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 212715] Review Request: openvrml - VRML/X3D runtime library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611150443.kAF4hqpj003815@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: openvrml - VRML/X3D runtime library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212715 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2006-11-14 23:43 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=141222) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=141222&action=view) fix dirently in openvrml-gtkplug.texi Braden, check this diff. It should solve the direntry issue. When testing, first, manually remove any line referring to openvrml from /usr/share/info/dir. Otherwise any attempts to run "rpm -e" will fail. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 15 05:46:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2006 00:46:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 198562] Review Request: zabbix - Open-source monitoring solution for your IT infrastructure In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611150546.kAF5kxKv005961@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: zabbix - Open-source monitoring solution for your IT infrastructure https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198562 cstubbs at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |cstubbs at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From cstubbs at gmail.com 2006-11-15 00:46 EST ------- Spec works well on RHEL4/CentOS4 too, and I've tested it with Zabbix 1.1.4 - no compile issues, but the same problem I'm seeing below occurred. Seems to center around 'make install'. Along with the .a libs you've excluded, it's gone and dumped a bunch of object files in /usr/lib in my build environment, so I'm getting unpackaged file errors on build. Checking for unpackaged file(s): /usr/lib/rpm/check-files /home/cstubbs/rpm/tmp/zabbix-1.1.3-3-root-cstubbs error: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found: /usr/lib/stD0Ikh0 /usr/lib/stIMYNMd/active.o /usr/lib/stIMYNMd/autoregister.o /usr/lib/stIMYNMd/trapper.o /usr/lib/stLeJGOP /usr/lib/stRDGpXX/action.o .... etc One work around is a few more exlude lines, %exclude %{_libdir}/st* %exclude %{_libdir}/st*/*.o -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 15 06:30:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2006 01:30:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 212715] Review Request: openvrml - VRML/X3D runtime library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611150630.kAF6UvLT007442@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: openvrml - VRML/X3D runtime library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212715 ------- Additional Comments From braden at endoframe.com 2006-11-15 01:30 EST ------- Thanks. I've buckled and converted this to a patch that is applied to the pristine sources. spec: http://endoframe.com/openvrml.spec patch: http://endoframe.com/openvrml-gtkplug-info.patch srpm: http://endoframe.com/openvrml-0.16.1-4.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 15 07:14:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2006 02:14:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 210790] Review Request: dar - Collection of scripts for making/restoring CD/DVD backups In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611150714.kAF7EigG008697@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dar - Collection of scripts for making/restoring CD/DVD backups https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210790 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-11-15 02:14 EST ------- Okay. ---------------------------------------------- This package (dar) is APPROVED by me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 15 07:40:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2006 02:40:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 211319] Review Request: andutteye-client - Andutteye Software Suite Monitoring agent In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611150740.kAF7eld1009908@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: andutteye-client - Andutteye Software Suite Monitoring agent https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211319 ------- Additional Comments From faucamp at csir.co.za 2006-11-15 02:40 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > packages, but the client package is the smallest, easiest to install and can be > used in standalone mode so i thought it could be a good start. Good plan, makes sense :-) The spec file looks better, but my primary concern is that it doesn't meet the packaging guidelines (http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines) and the review guidelines (http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines). Both of those pages provide a wealth of information and tips, and you might also find the following useful for your scriplets inside the spec file: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets Use rpmlint on the package (it is available from Extras), and try to fix as many of the problems as you can. To get more information from rpmlint, use the -i option (it gives a brief description of all problems, and may suggest possible fixes). Feel free to ask if you need help. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 15 09:10:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2006 04:10:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 198562] Review Request: zabbix - Open-source monitoring solution for your IT infrastructure In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611150910.kAF9A6ck015650@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: zabbix - Open-source monitoring solution for your IT infrastructure https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198562 ------- Additional Comments From dan at danny.cz 2006-11-15 04:10 EST ------- (In reply to comment #18) > Spec works well on RHEL4/CentOS4 too, and I've tested it with Zabbix 1.1.4 - no > compile issues, but the same problem I'm seeing below occurred. > > Seems to center around 'make install'. Along with the .a libs you've excluded, > it's gone and dumped a bunch of object files in /usr/lib in my build > environment, so I'm getting unpackaged file errors on build. > One work around is a few more exlude lines, > > %exclude %{_libdir}/st* > %exclude %{_libdir}/st*/*.o I see the same problems, my workaround was to delete the *.a files manualy during the %install and not use the %exclude directive at all. When you only comment out the %exclude line, then the strange files st*/*.o are not created. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 15 09:35:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2006 04:35:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 211807] Review Request: firefox2 - Mozilla Firefox 2.0 Web browser for FC6 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611150935.kAF9Zenn017450@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: firefox2 - Mozilla Firefox 2.0 Web browser for FC6 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211807 ------- Additional Comments From gawain.lynch at gmail.com 2006-11-15 04:35 EST ------- Neal, does it build if you comment out the "%patch200 -p1 -b .firefox2" line in the spec file? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 15 12:13:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2006 07:13:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 208169] Review Request: python-twisted-core - An asynchronous networking framework written in Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611151213.kAFCDGTT028704@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-twisted-core - An asynchronous networking framework written in Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208169 ------- Additional Comments From thomas at apestaart.org 2006-11-15 07:13 EST ------- Well, it's imported and I'm currently up to step 10 in the process. However I"m stumped by this page: http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/CVSSyncNeeded the page says I HAVE to provide a bugzilla number without mentioning what the bug in question should be about. Should I create a bug to ask for branches, then edit this wiki ? Should I link to this bug ? Is there some magic creating a bug for me when I import into cvs ? Please let me know so I can do what I need to do and clarify the wiki. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 15 12:17:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2006 07:17:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 208169] Review Request: python-twisted-core - An asynchronous networking framework written in Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611151217.kAFCHmDr028923@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-twisted-core - An asynchronous networking framework written in Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208169 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-11-15 07:17 EST ------- (In reply to comment #15) > I"m stumped by this page: > http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/CVSSyncNeeded > > the page says I HAVE to provide a bugzilla number without mentioning what the > bug in question should be about. Should I create a bug to ask for branches, > then edit this wiki ? Should I link to this bug ? Is there some magic creating a > bug for me when I import into cvs ? > > Please let me know so I can do what I need to do and clarify the wiki. The bugzilla number is the one for the review ticket, which would be 208169 in this case; no need to create a new one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 15 13:27:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2006 08:27:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 211807] Review Request: firefox2 - Mozilla Firefox 2.0 Web browser for FC6 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611151327.kAFDR6OX002547@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: firefox2 - Mozilla Firefox 2.0 Web browser for FC6 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211807 ------- Additional Comments From ndbecker2 at gmail.com 2006-11-15 08:27 EST ------- No. The problem must be that something was built without -fPIC. This is ignored on x86 32bit, but is really an error and doesn't work on x86_64. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 15 13:27:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2006 08:27:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 211807] Review Request: firefox2 - Mozilla Firefox 2.0 Web browser for FC6 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611151327.kAFDRuUE002659@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: firefox2 - Mozilla Firefox 2.0 Web browser for FC6 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211807 ndbecker2 at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ndbecker2 at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From ndbecker2 at gmail.com 2006-11-15 08:27 EST ------- No. The problem must be that something was built without -fPIC. This is ignored on x86 32bit, but is really an error and doesn't work on x86_64. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 15 14:17:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2006 09:17:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 211319] Review Request: andutteye-client - Andutteye Software Suite Monitoring agent In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611151417.kAFEHRUI008312@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: andutteye-client - Andutteye Software Suite Monitoring agent https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211319 ------- Additional Comments From andreas.utterberg at thundera.se 2006-11-15 09:17 EST ------- Thanx for all input! Hopefully it will go smoother on future packets when i have learned the Fedora standard correctly :-). Is this the right way to go if one wants to change locations on the software when the packed software in the Source tarbundle? have different locations defined? %install mkdir -p %{buildroot}%{andutteye_bin_dir} install -m 0755 opt/andutteye/backbone/andutteye-api-linux.pl %{buildroot}%{andutteye_bin_dir} install -m 0755 opt/andutteye/bin/andutteyed %{buildroot}%{andutteye_bin_dir} install -m 0755 opt/andutteye/utils/* %{buildroot}%{andutteye_bin_dir} install -m 0644 opt/andutteye/LICENSE rm -rf %{buildroot}/opt/andutteye Thanx in advance. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 15 14:22:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2006 09:22:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 211319] Review Request: andutteye-client - Andutteye Software Suite Monitoring agent In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611151422.kAFEMjTY008744@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: andutteye-client - Andutteye Software Suite Monitoring agent https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211319 ------- Additional Comments From andreas.utterberg at thundera.se 2006-11-15 09:22 EST ------- The spec file so far (Note haven tried to install with this yet!) http://www.andutteye.com/download/andutteye-client.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 15 14:45:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2006 09:45:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213511] Review Request: gxine - Gnome frontend for the xine multimedia library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611151445.kAFEjlDq010428@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gxine - Gnome frontend for the xine multimedia library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213511 ------- Additional Comments From martin.sourada at seznam.cz 2006-11-15 09:45 EST ------- (In reply to comment #26) > - Summary: gxine does not really use any gnome libraries, so perhaps call it > "GTK+ frontend" instead You are right. It should be GTK frontend > URL does not allow direct download. Change to one of the SF.net download server > that does have gxine? (easynews.dl.sourceforge.net works, for instance) This one can work, I think: http://superb-west.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/xine/gxine-0.5.8.tar.bz2 > For some reason libXrandr and libXtst dependencies are not picked up by RPM, > which is strange. Not sure what we need to do about that yet. I will try how gxine works without them installed. > BuildReqs: > Pkgconfig is not explicitly required (all -devel packages that provide a .pc > file depends on it) Overlooked >configure needs to be patched to fix lirc detection on x86_64 - see next comment. I don't have x86_64 machine so I did not know about the problem. > Browser plugin: perhaps move it instead of symlinking? I used the way they suggested in INSTALL file, but copying should work, too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 15 14:53:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2006 09:53:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 198562] Review Request: zabbix - Open-source monitoring solution for your IT infrastructure In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611151453.kAFErKEY011166@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: zabbix - Open-source monitoring solution for your IT infrastructure https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198562 ------- Additional Comments From jwilson at redhat.com 2006-11-15 09:53 EST ------- Odd, I remember seeing those files at one point in time, but I don't with the 1.1.3 spec that only %exclude'd .a files... If killing static libs in %install works around it for cases where its still happening, I have no problem switching to that instead of %exclude. I've done that in a 1.1.4 package: http://wilsonet.com/packages/zabbix/zabbix-1.1.4-1.fc6.src.rpm http://wilsonet.com/packages/zabbix/zabbix.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 15 14:59:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2006 09:59:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213511] Review Request: gxine - Gnome frontend for the xine multimedia library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611151459.kAFExjNV011661@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gxine - Gnome frontend for the xine multimedia library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213511 ------- Additional Comments From martin.sourada at seznam.cz 2006-11-15 09:59 EST ------- (In reply to comment #30) > Martin, is gxine still crashing on you? > Yes, still crashing. Do you have any idea whence the SIGSEGV come? I noticed that the first part of error message (everything without the line with SIGSEGV) also appears when adding videos to playlist - this part appears once for each file: > CDROMREADTOCHDR: Input/Output error > WARN: error in ioctl CDROMREADTOCHDR: Input/Output error > > WARN: error reading PVD sector (16) error -1 And this very line appears before gxine crashes - as far as I remember it happens only when opening the video: > Unauthorized access to memory (SIGSEGV) And it seems that it happens to one certain file. Maybe the problem is in the very file, but kaffeine plays it without problems. I will try to find out more about the problem. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 15 15:20:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2006 10:20:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 208113] Review Request: freepops - a tool to get html mail through a pop daemon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611151520.kAFFKaSO013705@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: freepops - a tool to get html mail through a pop daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208113 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 15 15:25:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2006 10:25:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213511] Review Request: gxine - Gnome frontend for the xine multimedia library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611151525.kAFFPFAU014034@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gxine - Gnome frontend for the xine multimedia library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213511 ------- Additional Comments From martin.sourada at seznam.cz 2006-11-15 10:25 EST ------- (In reply to comment #32) > And it seems that it happens to one certain file. Maybe the problem is in the > very file, but kaffeine plays it without problems. I will try to find out more > about the problem. Checked all my videos - it happens to 9 out of 45 videos. I will try to check what is the connection between them. I must say though that all of them are encoded with DivX/mpeg-4/XviD so if the problem is due to codec we will not try to solve it here, I think. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 15 15:38:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2006 10:38:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 209260] Review Request: beryl-manager - Beryl window decorator and theme management utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611151538.kAFFcXP3015088@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: beryl-manager - Beryl window decorator and theme management utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209260 ------- Additional Comments From jwilson at redhat.com 2006-11-15 10:38 EST ------- Okay, just pushed a build of beryl-core for devel that creates a beryl package that depends on beryl-gnome, beryl-kde and bdock, then beryl-gnome and beryl-kde packages that depend on all their respective bits. Basically, yum install beryl-gnome gives you everything but bdock and aquamarine, yum install beryl-kde gives you everything but bdock and heliodor, and yum install beryl gives you the kitchen sink. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 15 15:41:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2006 10:41:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 208169] Review Request: python-twisted-core - An asynchronous networking framework written in Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611151541.kAFFfHRI015292@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-twisted-core - An asynchronous networking framework written in Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208169 ------- Additional Comments From giallu at gmail.com 2006-11-15 10:40 EST ------- (In reply to comment #15) > > Please let me know so I can do what I need to do and clarify the wiki. > I took this opportunity to make my first "contribution" to the wiki... feel free to rephrase the comment if you still feel it is not clear. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 15 15:42:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2006 10:42:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 209259] Review Request: beryl-core - Beryl OpenGL window and compositing manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611151542.kAFFgH85015375@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: beryl-core - Beryl OpenGL window and compositing manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209259 ------- Additional Comments From jwilson at redhat.com 2006-11-15 10:42 EST ------- Had to figure out a build failure on ppc first (upstream tarball was littered with little-endian .o files), then went and created beryl, beryl-gnome and beryl-kde meta-packages that people will be able to install. -Package beryl depends on bdock, beryl-gnome and beryl-kde -Package beryl-gnome depends on all beryl bits except bdock and aquamarine -Package berly-kde depends on all beryl bits except bdock and heliodor Builds for devel are already complete, branching for FC-6 has been requested. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 15 15:45:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2006 10:45:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213511] Review Request: gxine - Gnome frontend for the xine multimedia library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611151545.kAFFjwKJ015865@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gxine - Gnome frontend for the xine multimedia library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213511 ------- Additional Comments From michel.salim at gmail.com 2006-11-15 10:45 EST ------- I've had one troublesome video (Doug Lenat's lecture at Google, downloadable from Google Video in - unfortunately - mp4 format) that can't be seeked from gxine but plays fine in mplayer. But agreed, it's not a packaging bug, it probably should just be filed upstream. Could you compile the standard xine player on your computer and see if it's a xine-lib problem or a gxine problem? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 15 15:48:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2006 10:48:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 174883] Review Request: distcc -- A free distributed C/C++ compiler system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611151548.kAFFmrvK016109@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: distcc -- A free distributed C/C++ compiler system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174883 ------- Additional Comments From laurent.rineau__fedora_extras at normalesup.org 2006-11-15 10:48 EST ------- What is the status of the current review? It seems stalled. Enrico -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 15 15:50:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2006 10:50:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 174883] Review Request: distcc -- A free distributed C/C++ compiler system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611151550.kAFFoLfh016213@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: distcc -- A free distributed C/C++ compiler system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174883 laurent.rineau__fedora_extras at normalesup.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |laurent.rineau__fedora_extra | |s at normalesup.org ------- Additional Comments From laurent.rineau__fedora_extras at normalesup.org 2006-11-15 10:50 EST ------- What is the status of the current review? It seems stalled. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 15 15:51:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2006 10:51:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 211319] Review Request: andutteye-client - Andutteye Software Suite Monitoring agent In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611151551.kAFFpIKP016356@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: andutteye-client - Andutteye Software Suite Monitoring agent https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211319 ------- Additional Comments From faucamp at csir.co.za 2006-11-15 10:51 EST ------- (In reply to comment #7) > Thanx for all input! Hopefully it will go smoother on future packets when i have > learned the Fedora standard correctly :-). We all learn this way... :-) You'll find that Fedora's package guidelines will assist you greatly in making quality packages for other distributions also, should the need ever arise. >Is this the right way to go if one > wants to change locations on the software when the packed software in the Source > tarbundle? have different locations defined? > > > %install > mkdir -p %{buildroot}%{andutteye_bin_dir} > install -m 0755 opt/andutteye/backbone/andutteye-api-linux.pl > %{buildroot}%{andutteye_bin_dir} > install -m 0755 opt/andutteye/bin/andutteyed > %{buildroot}%{andutteye_bin_dir} > install -m 0755 opt/andutteye/utils/* > %{buildroot}%{andutteye_bin_dir} > install -m 0644 opt/andutteye/LICENSE > rm -rf %{buildroot}/opt/andutteye > > You can do it this way, but *if* your source tarball has a makefile, try to rather create an "install target" patch for it; its cleaner, and allows you to add (submit) it to the upstream source. In your case, this is fine (since the upstream source does not have any such makefile). A few comments: * don't use %{andutteye_*_dir}; use one of the standard macros, like %{_bindir}; you can find documentation on these macros in /usr/share/doc/rpm-4.4.2; they are defined in code in /usr/lib/rpm/macros. In short: %_prefix /usr %_exec_prefix %{_prefix} %_bindir %{_exec_prefix}/bin %_sbindir %{_exec_prefix}/sbin %_libexecdir %{_exec_prefix}/libexec %_datadir %{_prefix}/share %_sysconfdir %{_prefix}/etc %_sharedstatedir %{_prefix}/com %_localstatedir %{_prefix}/var %_libdir %{_exec_prefix}/lib %_includedir %{_prefix}/include %_oldincludedir /usr/include %_infodir %{_prefix}/info %_mandir %{_prefix}/man * Use -p for "install" and "cp" commands, to preserve timestamps. See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-0239576e441f9ef53d175c4aec8c12868dffb5ab * Insert a "rm -rf %{buildroot}" command as the first line of %install * The final line in %install, "rm -rf %{buildroot}/opt/andutteye", should not be necessary, since the directory isn't created * In your %files section: %doc %{andutteye_doc_dir}/LICENSE, etc - the %{andutteye_doc_dir} is not necessary, as %doc automatically places these files in the correct dir (/usr/share/doc/%{name}-%{version}-${release}) * Also in %files, rather use the standard dir macros This is looking much better! :-) From now on, please increment the release tag for each subsequent spec publishing (and check that the changelog version-release info matches that of the spec ;-) ) Also, for other people to participate in the review, it will be necessary to build SRPMs for each release as well, so everything can be tested. Good luck! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 15 15:56:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2006 10:56:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213511] Review Request: gxine - Gnome frontend for the xine multimedia library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611151556.kAFFuvlQ016731@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gxine - Gnome frontend for the xine multimedia library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213511 ------- Additional Comments From martin.sourada at seznam.cz 2006-11-15 10:56 EST ------- (In reply to comment #34) > Could you compile the standard xine player on your computer and see if it's a > xine-lib problem or a gxine problem? I think that it is not xine-lib bug, since in totem and kaffeine (both using xine-lib as backend in my computer) it plays without problems. But I will install xine still, and check it to be sure. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 15 16:02:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2006 11:02:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213511] Review Request: gxine - Gnome frontend for the xine multimedia library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611151602.kAFG2vgp017286@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gxine - Gnome frontend for the xine multimedia library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213511 ------- Additional Comments From martin.sourada at seznam.cz 2006-11-15 11:02 EST ------- Ok, installed xine from livna. Result is: gxine bug. In xine it works. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 15 16:31:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2006 11:31:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 208113] Review Request: freepops - a tool to get html mail through a pop daemon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611151631.kAFGVbA4020562@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: freepops - a tool to get html mail through a pop daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208113 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-11-15 11:31 EST ------- Well, I only checked this package (freepops) by packaging issue and not fully checked yet, however it seems not a few issues to be fixed. Please fix the following before I can check this fully. Please make yourself familiar with the following URLs. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines Then; 0. For spec file: 0-1 On Description stage: * Version: - Use %{?dist} tag. i.e. use 1%{?dist} - Note: every time use fix spec files, please increment release number. * Source2: - Executable flags on source is forbidden. - Please specify the URL (same for other sources). * BuildRoot: - The recommended BuildRoot are described on http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines * BuildRequires: - openssl-devel This is redundant because curl-devel requires this. * Requires: - All the requires written are not necessary because libraries' dependency automatically pulls them. * Patch: - Please rename the name of the patch to something like: 'freepops-0.0.99-configure.patch' so that it can again renamed when the content of the patch has to be updated when the original source changes. 0-2 On %prep stage: * %{update} %SOURCE3 - Well, doing some work (like expanding some files) except under $RPM_BUILD_DIR or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT is not allowed. * ./configure.sh - This should be in %build section 0-3 On %build section - make all Fedora specific compilation flags (can be checked by 'rpm --eval %optflags') are not used. * NOTE: Please use the option 'H=""' so that what 'make' process is actually doing. - WHERE=/usr/ Please use macros (i.e. WHERE=%{_prefix}) - FORCE_LINK="-L /tmp/freepops-expat/expat/.libs/" This is not allowed because the path /tmp/freepops-expat/expat/.libs/ is never used. 0-4 On %install stage: - install -m755 (and extra) Use "install -p" to keep timestamps. 0-5 On %post %postun %preun stage: %post: /sbin/chkconfig --add freepopsd This means that spec file should have the entry: Requires(post): /sbin/chkconfig (and same for other). Please check: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets 0-6 On %files stage: - /etc/rc.d/init.d/freepopsd - %{_sysconfdir}/sysconfig/freepopsd Please use %{_sysconfdir} BOTH. - %{_datadir}/%{name} %{_datadir}/%{name}/lua %{_sysconfdir}/freepops/ All the directories aboveare not owned by any packages. 0-6 For debuginfo package: -------------------------------------------------- E: freepops-debuginfo script-without-shebang /usr/src/debug/freepops-0.0.99/modules/src/luacompat/compat-5.1r4/compat-5.1.h E: freepops-debuginfo wrong-script-end-of-line-encoding /usr/src/debug/freepops-0.0.99/modules/src/luacompat/compat-5.1r4/compat-5.1.h E: freepops-debuginfo script-without-shebang /usr/src/debug/freepops-0.0.99/modules/src/luacompat/compat-5.1r4/compat-5.1.c E: freepops-debuginfo wrong-script-end-of-line-encoding /usr/src/debug/freepops-0.0.99/modules/src/luacompat/compat-5.1r4/compat-5.1.c -------------------------------------------------- - For this case: * 'script-without-shebang' means that this file has incorrect permission. Change the permission to 0644. * 'wrong-script-end-of-line-encoding' means this file has Windows-like (CRLF) end-of-line encoding. Fix this by using dos2unix or use: sed -i -e 's|\r||' . - Build log says: --------------------------------------------------- + /usr/lib/rpm/find-debuginfo.sh /home/tasaka1/rpmbuild/BUILD/freepops-0.0.99 extracting debug info from /var/tmp/freepops-0.0.99-1.tmp1-buildroot/usr/bin/freepopsd cpio: freepops-0.0.99/modules/src/getdate/getdate-curl-7.11.0/getdate.c: No such file or directory 1479 blocks --------------------------------------------------- This means that getdate.c should be installed into debuginfo rpm, however, it is missing. Then build log (with debugging with 'H=""') says: --------------------------------------------------- echo " linking libgetdate.a" linking libgetdate.a ar r libgetdate.a getdate.o 1>/dev/null 2>/dev/null cp libgetdate.a /home/tasaka1/rpmbuild/BUILD/freepops-0.0.99/modules/lib cp getdate.h /home/tasaka1/rpmbuild/BUILD/freepops-0.0.99/modules/include rm getdate.c <- here echo -n echo -n -------------------------------------------------- This is incorrect and should be fixed. Well, then 1. From http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines : * Use rpmlint - rpmlint is not silent (for srpm) E: freepops configure-without-libdir-spec This means that configure doesn't specify libdir. For this package this may be ignored, however, you can suppress this error by explicitly using '--libdir=%{_libdir}'. 2. From http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines : = Seems okay but for the issues above. 3. Other things I have noticed : * %doc - I think 'TODO' should be added. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 15 16:40:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2006 11:40:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 209261] Review Request: beryl-settings - Beryl OpenGL window and compositing manager GUI config utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611151640.kAFGeW0x021149@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: beryl-settings - Beryl OpenGL window and compositing manager GUI config utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209261 mr.ecik at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mr.ecik at gmail.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mr.ecik at gmail.com 2006-11-15 11:40 EST ------- MUST items: * rpmlint is quiet * package is named well * spec file name is good * package meets Packaging Guidelines * package is licensed with a GPL open-source compatible license * License field in spec file matches actual license * license file is included in %doc * md5sums are matching (882aac1837f92dc20b92927900a917f3) * package successfully compiles on x86_64 * BuildRequires listed well (mock builds succesfully) * spec file handles locales properly * proper %post and %postun sections * not relocatable * package owns directories well * no duplicates in %files * every %files section includes %defattr * proper %clean section * macros used well * .desktop file is present and looks good :) Another beryl approved package :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 15 17:24:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2006 12:24:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 212898] Review Request: php-pear-Structures-DataGrid-Renderer-Pager - Renderer driver using PEAR::Pager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611151724.kAFHOFvH026018@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Structures-DataGrid-Renderer-Pager - Renderer driver using PEAR::Pager Alias: DG-Renderer-Pager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212898 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 15 17:38:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2006 12:38:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 209262] Review Request: beryl-plugins - Beryl OpenGL window and compositing manager plug-ins In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611151738.kAFHcHbi027508@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: beryl-plugins - Beryl OpenGL window and compositing manager plug-ins https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209262 mr.ecik at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mr.ecik at gmail.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mr.ecik at gmail.com 2006-11-15 12:38 EST ------- MUST items: * rpmlint is quiet * package is named well * spec file name is good * package meets Packaging Guidelines * package is licensed with a GPL open-source compatible license * License field in spec file matches actual license * license file is included in %doc * md5sums are matching (6721bf8bd5fcbe0cabb0a67caa920fcb) * package successfully compiles on x86_64 * BuildRequires listed well (mock builds successfully) * no locales * no need to %post and %postun sections * not relocatable * package owns directories well * no duplicates in %files * every %files section includes %defattr * proper %clean section * macros used well Looks pretty good for me :) Approved -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 15 18:17:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2006 13:17:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 212898] Review Request: php-pear-Structures-DataGrid-Renderer-Pager - Renderer driver using PEAR::Pager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611151817.kAFIHTvI031813@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Structures-DataGrid-Renderer-Pager - Renderer driver using PEAR::Pager Alias: DG-Renderer-Pager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212898 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-11-15 13:17 EST ------- Wow, that's a long filename. And another no-documentation package, as well. What's with the PHP folks? W: php-pear-Structures-DataGrid-Renderer-Pager no-documentation W: php-pear-Structures-DataGrid-Renderer-Pager filename-too-long-for-joliet php-pear-Structures-DataGrid-Renderer-Pager-0.1.0-1.fc7.noarch.rpm I am not sure what the implications of the massive filename are. There's nothing in the guidelines about limiting the length of filenames so I don't think it's a blocker, but I think the issue needs to be discussed. Also, php-pear-Structures-DataGrid doesn't seem to be at my mirror yet even though it was pushed 18 hours ago. I put it in a local repository. * source files match upstream: 6604bb72ff0b78c8651cd17eef0d5fe4 Structures_DataGrid_Renderer_Pager-0.1.0.tgz * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * dist tag is present. * build root is correct. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. License text not included upstream. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * package installs properly O rpmlint output is OK * final provides and requires are sane: php-pear(Structures_DataGrid_Renderer_Pager) = 0.1.0 php-pear-Structures-DataGrid-Renderer-Pager = 0.1.0-1.fc7 = /bin/sh /usr/bin/pear php-pear(PEAR) php-pear(Pager) php-pear(Structures_DataGrid) * %check is not present; no test suite upstream. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * scriptlets are OK (pear module installation). * code, not content. * no documentation, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 15 18:26:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2006 13:26:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 212917] Review Request: php-pear-DB-DataObject - An SQL Builder, Object Interface to Database Tables In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611151826.kAFIQZt8032726@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-DB-DataObject - An SQL Builder, Object Interface to Database Tables Alias: DB-DataObject https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212917 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 15 18:46:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2006 13:46:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 212917] Review Request: php-pear-DB-DataObject - An SQL Builder, Object Interface to Database Tables In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611151846.kAFIk2Ng001480@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-DB-DataObject - An SQL Builder, Object Interface to Database Tables Alias: DB-DataObject https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212917 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-11-15 13:45 EST ------- Something's odd with the changelog entry; it shows version 1.0.0-0.1.RC5 but the package version is 1.8.4. This causes an rpmlint complaint: W: php-pear-DB-DataObject incoherent-version-in-changelog 1.0.0-0.1.RC5 1.8.4-1.fc7 There's also this: E: php-pear-DB-DataObject non-executable-script /usr/share/pear/DB/DataObject/createTables.php 0644 I think this is actually an end-user executable. Should it really be buried under /usr/share, or should it be in /usr/bin? * source files match upstream: 770c44d243066340d639b063235dcc02 DB_DataObject-1.8.4.tgz * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. X The spec is fine except for the changelog. * dist tag is present. * build root is correct. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. License text not included upstream. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * compiler flags are appropriate. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * package installs properly X rpmlint has valid complaints. * final provides and requires are sane: php-pear(DB_DataObject) = 1.8.4 php-pear-DB-DataObject = 1.8.4-1.fc7 = /bin/sh /usr/bin/pear php-pear(DB) php-pear(Date) php-pear(MDB2) php-pear(PEAR) php-pear(Validate) * %check is not present; no test suite upstream. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. ? not sure about file permissions. * scriptlets are OK (pear module installation). * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 15 19:09:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2006 14:09:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215645] Package wgrib seperately? In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611151909.kAFJ9WYt003418@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Package wgrib seperately? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215645 orion at cora.nwra.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |215792 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 15 19:09:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2006 14:09:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215792] New: Review Request: wgrib - Manipulate, inventory and decode GRIB files Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215792 Summary: Review Request: wgrib - Manipulate, inventory and decode GRIB files Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All URL: http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: orion at cora.nwra.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec Name or Url: http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/wgrib.spec SRPM Name or Url: http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/wgrib-1.8.0.12b-1.fc6.src.rpm Description: WGRIB is a program to manipulate, inventory and decode GRIB files. Note that an older wgrib is currently shipped with grads, this will replace it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 15 19:19:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2006 14:19:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 212900] Review Request: php-pear-Structures-DataGrid-Renderer-Smarty - Renderer driver using Smarty In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611151919.kAFJJ7fc004204@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Structures-DataGrid-Renderer-Smarty - Renderer driver using Smarty Alias: DG-Renderer-Smarty https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212900 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-11-15 14:19 EST ------- Look like there's a typo in one of your Requires: lines: php-pear(Strucutres_DataGrid_Renderer_Pager) ^^ Fixing this gets things going. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 15 19:25:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2006 14:25:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 209263] Review Request: emerald - Themeable window decorator and compositing manager for Beryl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611151925.kAFJP0ps004995@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: emerald - Themeable window decorator and compositing manager for Beryl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209263 mr.ecik at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mr.ecik at gmail.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mr.ecik at gmail.com 2006-11-15 14:24 EST ------- MUST items: !* rpmlint output: E: emerald binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/lib64/emerald/engines/ libpixmap.so ['/usr/lib64'] E: emerald binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/lib64/emerald/engines/ libtruglass.so ['/usr/lib64'] E: emerald binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/lib64/emerald/engines/ libvrunner.so ['/usr/lib64'] E: emerald binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/lib64/emerald/engines/ liboxygen.so ['/usr/lib64'] E: emerald binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/lib64/emerald/engines/ liblegacy.so ['/usr/lib64'] E: emerald binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/lib64/emerald/engines/ libzootreeves.so ['/usr/lib64'] E: emerald binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/emerald-theme-manager ['/usr/ lib64'] E: emerald binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/emerald ['/usr/lib64'] W: emerald-devel no-documentation * package is named well * spec file name is good * package meets Packaging Guidelines * package is licensed with a GPL open-source compatible license * License field in spec file matches actual license * license file is included in %doc * md5sums are matching (c273fe82c7e3b2867f05073f3b012708) * package successfully compiles on x86_64 * BuildRequires listed well (mock builds well) * spec file handles locales properly * proper %post and %postun sections * not relocatable * package owns directories well * no duplicates in %files * every %files section includes %defattr * proper %clean section * macros used well * -devel subpackage created good * .desktop file present and looks good THINGS to do: * you have to fix rpath issue by adding following lines to %prep section: sed -i 's|^hardcode_libdir_flag_spec=.*|hardcode_libdir_flag_spec=""|g' libtool sed -i 's|^runpath_var=LD_RUN_PATH|runpath_var=DIE_RPATH_DIE|g' libtool -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 15 19:36:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2006 14:36:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 189195] Review Request: horde - php application framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611151936.kAFJaBFI005866@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: horde - php application framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189195 ------- Additional Comments From greg at runlevel7.ca 2006-11-15 14:36 EST ------- Sort of a catch-22 that Horde requires php >= 4.3, but is impossible to write a spec file that works for php4 and php5 (at the moment) because of this bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215655 Just making a note that if that bug is fixed, you could require php-domxml rather than php-xml and then RHEL4 and RHEL5 users could use this horde rpm. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 15 19:46:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2006 14:46:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215292] Review Request: cups-pdf - Extension for creating pdf-Files with CUPS In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611151946.kAFJkl60006721@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cups-pdf - Extension for creating pdf-Files with CUPS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215292 Fedora at FamilleCollet.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 15 19:48:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2006 14:48:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 189195] Review Request: horde - php application framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611151948.kAFJmpxh006987@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: horde - php application framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189195 ------- Additional Comments From greg at runlevel7.ca 2006-11-15 14:48 EST ------- (In reply to comment #17) > Just making a note that if that bug is fixed, you could require php-domxml > rather than php-xml and then RHEL4 and RHEL5 users could use this horde rpm. Of course that would also have to be cloned and fixed in the Fedora versions you plan to make this available for, so it's more of a long-term suggestion. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 15 19:48:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2006 14:48:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 212900] Review Request: php-pear-Structures-DataGrid-Renderer-Smarty - Renderer driver using Smarty In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611151948.kAFJmuHB007016@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Structures-DataGrid-Renderer-Smarty - Renderer driver using Smarty Alias: DG-Renderer-Smarty https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212900 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-11-15 14:48 EST ------- Another no-documentation package with an incredibly long name: W: php-pear-Structures-DataGrid-Renderer-Smarty no-documentation W: php-pear-Structures-DataGrid-Renderer-Smarty filename-too-long-for-joliet php-pear-Structures-DataGrid-Renderer-Smarty-0.1.2-1.fc7.noarch.rpm No blockers, though. * source files match upstream: a5e209d09588b82c3e46b6f4d7fef242 Structures_DataGrid_Renderer_Smarty-0.1.2.tgz * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * dist tag is present. * build root is correct. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. License text not included upstream. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * package installs properly O rpmlint output is acceptable. * final provides and requires are sane: php-pear(Structures_DataGrid_Renderer_Smarty) = 0.1.2 php-pear-Structures-DataGrid-Renderer-Smarty = 0.1.2-1.fc7 = /bin/sh /usr/bin/pear php-Smarty php-pear(PEAR) php-pear(Structures_DataGrid_Renderer_Pager) * %check is not present; no test suite upstream. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * scriptlets are OK (pear module installation). * code, not content. * no documentation, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 15 19:55:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2006 14:55:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215185] Review Request: compat-libosip2 - compatability package for libosip2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611151955.kAFJtFun007850@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compat-libosip2 - compatability package for libosip2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215185 jeff at ocjtech.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From jeff at ocjtech.us 2006-11-15 14:55 EST ------- Ok, imported and built for FC-5, FC-6, and devel -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 15 20:10:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2006 15:10:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 211319] Review Request: andutteye-client - Andutteye Software Suite Monitoring agent In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611152010.kAFKAHfS009046@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: andutteye-client - Andutteye Software Suite Monitoring agent https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211319 ------- Additional Comments From andreas.utterberg at thundera.se 2006-11-15 15:10 EST ------- As said before, thanx for the fast and good replies and input!! I agree that the spec file looks more "clean" now. I have now tried to build on it, installed, reinstalled and uninstalled the software, looks fine in AES point of view. Let me know if i shall correct anything else in the spec. Release tag and changelog should be in sync now ;). I have uploaded new files, here. http://www.andutteye.com/download/andutteye-client.spec http://www.andutteye.com/download/andutteye-client-2.3-9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 15 20:11:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2006 15:11:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 177583] Review Request: zaptel-kmod In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611152011.kAFKBUO7009177@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: zaptel-kmod https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177583 jeff at ocjtech.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG OtherBugsDependingO|163778, 208686 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 15 20:23:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2006 15:23:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 208169] Review Request: python-twisted-core - An asynchronous networking framework written in Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611152023.kAFKNOdf009677@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-twisted-core - An asynchronous networking framework written in Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208169 ------- Additional Comments From thomas at apestaart.org 2006-11-15 15:23 EST ------- ok, that helps. Did that step. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 15 21:00:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2006 16:00:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 209263] Review Request: emerald - Themeable window decorator and compositing manager for Beryl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611152100.kAFL0gFP012045@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: emerald - Themeable window decorator and compositing manager for Beryl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209263 ------- Additional Comments From jwilson at redhat.com 2006-11-15 16:00 EST ------- Blah, I meant to run rpmlint over all the packages to catch stuff like this... The suggested fix doesn't work on this package, but adding this to %prep does: perl -pi -e 's|hardcode_into_libs=.*|hardcode_into_libs=no|g' configure perl -pi -e 's|hardcode_libdir_flag_spec=.*|hardcode_libdir_flag_spec=""|g' configure perl -pi -e 's|runpath_var=LD_RUN_PATH|runpath_var=DIE_RPATH_DIE|g' configure New build has that included, rpmlint is (almost) silent: http://wilsonet.com/packages/beryl/emerald-0.1.2-3.fc6.src.rpm $ rpmlint /build/RPMS/x86_64/emerald-*0.1.2-3* W: emerald-devel no-documentation -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 15 21:05:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2006 16:05:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 209260] Review Request: beryl-manager - Beryl window decorator and theme management utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611152105.kAFL5rmh012337@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: beryl-manager - Beryl window decorator and theme management utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209260 ------- Additional Comments From jwilson at redhat.com 2006-11-15 16:05 EST ------- Importing into CVS now, requesting branching momentarily. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 15 21:21:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2006 16:21:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 209259] Review Request: beryl-core - Beryl OpenGL window and compositing manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611152121.kAFLL7Wq013444@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: beryl-core - Beryl OpenGL window and compositing manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209259 jwilson at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From jwilson at redhat.com 2006-11-15 16:20 EST ------- FC-6 builds also done, closing NEXTRELEASE. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 15 21:21:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2006 16:21:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 209264] Review Request: emerald-themes - Themes for Emerald, the window decorator for Beryl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611152121.kAFLLwIb013559@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: emerald-themes - Themes for Emerald, the window decorator for Beryl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209264 Bug 209264 depends on bug 209259, which changed state. Bug 209259 Summary: Review Request: beryl-core - Beryl OpenGL window and compositing manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209259 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 15 21:22:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2006 16:22:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 209263] Review Request: emerald - Themeable window decorator and compositing manager for Beryl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611152122.kAFLMRHZ013639@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: emerald - Themeable window decorator and compositing manager for Beryl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209263 Bug 209263 depends on bug 209259, which changed state. Bug 209259 Summary: Review Request: beryl-core - Beryl OpenGL window and compositing manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209259 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 15 21:22:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2006 16:22:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215569] Review Request: beryl-vidcap - Beryl OpenGL window and compositing manager video capture utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611152122.kAFLMtwp013698@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: beryl-vidcap - Beryl OpenGL window and compositing manager video capture utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215569 Bug 215569 depends on bug 209259, which changed state. Bug 209259 Summary: Review Request: beryl-core - Beryl OpenGL window and compositing manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209259 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 15 21:23:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2006 16:23:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215563] Review Request: aquamarine - Themeable window decorator and compositing manager for Beryl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611152123.kAFLN77r013725@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aquamarine - Themeable window decorator and compositing manager for Beryl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215563 Bug 215563 depends on bug 209259, which changed state. Bug 209259 Summary: Review Request: beryl-core - Beryl OpenGL window and compositing manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209259 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 15 21:23:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2006 16:23:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215564] Review Request: bdock - Beryl project's replacement windowmaker dock In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611152123.kAFLNIxO013737@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bdock - Beryl project's replacement windowmaker dock https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215564 Bug 215564 depends on bug 209259, which changed state. Bug 209259 Summary: Review Request: beryl-core - Beryl OpenGL window and compositing manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209259 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 15 21:23:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2006 16:23:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215571] Review Request: heliodor - Beryl window decorator with Metacity theme support In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611152123.kAFLNTNn013750@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: heliodor - Beryl window decorator with Metacity theme support https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215571 Bug 215571 depends on bug 209259, which changed state. Bug 209259 Summary: Review Request: beryl-core - Beryl OpenGL window and compositing manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209259 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 15 21:23:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2006 16:23:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 209260] Review Request: beryl-manager - Beryl window decorator and theme management utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611152123.kAFLNfS2013766@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: beryl-manager - Beryl window decorator and theme management utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209260 Bug 209260 depends on bug 209259, which changed state. Bug 209259 Summary: Review Request: beryl-core - Beryl OpenGL window and compositing manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209259 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 15 21:24:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2006 16:24:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 209261] Review Request: beryl-settings - Beryl OpenGL window and compositing manager GUI config utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611152124.kAFLOFi3013875@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: beryl-settings - Beryl OpenGL window and compositing manager GUI config utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209261 Bug 209261 depends on bug 209259, which changed state. Bug 209259 Summary: Review Request: beryl-core - Beryl OpenGL window and compositing manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209259 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 15 21:24:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2006 16:24:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215568] Review Request: beryl-dbus - Beryl OpenGL window and compositing manager dbus plug-in In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611152124.kAFLOTxo013934@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: beryl-dbus - Beryl OpenGL window and compositing manager dbus plug-in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215568 Bug 215568 depends on bug 209259, which changed state. Bug 209259 Summary: Review Request: beryl-core - Beryl OpenGL window and compositing manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209259 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 15 21:24:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2006 16:24:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 209262] Review Request: beryl-plugins - Beryl OpenGL window and compositing manager plug-ins In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611152124.kAFLOfR2013961@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: beryl-plugins - Beryl OpenGL window and compositing manager plug-ins https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209262 Bug 209262 depends on bug 209259, which changed state. Bug 209259 Summary: Review Request: beryl-core - Beryl OpenGL window and compositing manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209259 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 15 21:51:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2006 16:51:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 209263] Review Request: emerald - Themeable window decorator and compositing manager for Beryl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611152151.kAFLpS5o016075@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: emerald - Themeable window decorator and compositing manager for Beryl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209263 mr.ecik at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mr.ecik at gmail.com 2006-11-15 16:51 EST ------- (In reply to comment #8) > Blah, I meant to run rpmlint over all the packages to catch stuff like this... > The suggested fix doesn't work on this package, but adding this to %prep does: Hmm... Odd... I tried the solution I suggested and it did work for me. But your solution works too so nothing stands in the way to approve the package. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 15 22:04:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2006 17:04:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 210790] Review Request: dar - Collection of scripts for making/restoring CD/DVD backups In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611152204.kAFM4VtF017364@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dar - Collection of scripts for making/restoring CD/DVD backups https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210790 lists at forevermore.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 15 22:15:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2006 17:15:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 168690] Review Request: pyBackPack (GTK+ Python backup tool) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611152215.kAFMFMZ7018232@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyBackPack (GTK+ Python backup tool) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=168690 ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2006-11-15 17:15 EST ------- I have bugs to report, but your ticketing system is not open for tickets ("TICKET_CREATE privileges are required to perform this operation"). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 15 22:16:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2006 17:16:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 189195] Review Request: horde - php application framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611152216.kAFMGS3s018321@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: horde - php application framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189195 ------- Additional Comments From greg at runlevel7.ca 2006-11-15 17:16 EST ------- (In reply to comment #14) > What are you unsure about php_database? That it's a valid requirement or that > it is needed? It may not be needed in all configurations, so I think it should be removed. It is not in the 'Required' section of http://www.horde.org/horde/docs/? f=INSTALL.html#prerequisites - "If a preference container is not configured, no preference options will be configurable via Horde's web interface - the default values stored in each applications config/prefs.php file will be used" -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 15 23:31:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2006 18:31:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 168690] Review Request: pyBackPack (GTK+ Python backup tool) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611152331.kAFNVl6b024517@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyBackPack (GTK+ Python backup tool) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=168690 ------- Additional Comments From andy at andrewprice.me.uk 2006-11-15 18:31 EST ------- Sorry about that, i closed it to avoid spam (sigh) and then had trouble installing a user accounts module so for the moment you can log in as guest/guest to file a ticket. I should probably have documented this more obviously. I look forward to reading your bugs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 15 23:32:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2006 18:32:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215792] Review Request: wgrib - Manipulate, inventory and decode GRIB files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611152332.kAFNWKgf024565@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wgrib - Manipulate, inventory and decode GRIB files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215792 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |pertusus at free.fr OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-11-15 18:32 EST ------- It is not completely obvious that the version-release is right, maybe it could also be something like 1.8.0-0.1.12b to be safe in case 1.8.0 appears. Not sure, as it may also be some post-releases. It seems to be 1.8.0.12g, anyway. Otherwise * matches upstream (diff used) * rpmlint gives (easy to fix) W: wgrib incoherent-version-in-changelog 1.8.0.12b 1.8.0.12b-1 * license is public domain, notice included, match upstream * upstream is not properly packaged. Maybe you could send a mail? * %files right * very simple package I wanted to test using the porting.txt instructions, but couldn't download ftp://wesley.ncep.noaa.gov/pub/wgrib/land.grb If it is possible, I think it would be good to include that file, if it isn't too big. The only potential blocker, in my opinion is the version-release. What branch will you create? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 15 23:40:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2006 18:40:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215792] Review Request: wgrib - Manipulate, inventory and decode GRIB files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611152340.kAFNeTGO025082@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wgrib - Manipulate, inventory and decode GRIB files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215792 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-11-15 18:40 EST ------- I found land.grb ftp://ftp.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/wd51we/wgrib/land.grb Also ftp://ftp.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/wd51we/wgrib/testbin.c ftp://ftp.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/wd51we/wgrib/testbin.f should be shipped All the tests were successful. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 15 23:59:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2006 18:59:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215792] Review Request: wgrib - Manipulate, inventory and decode GRIB files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611152359.kAFNxMoZ025931@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wgrib - Manipulate, inventory and decode GRIB files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215792 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-11-15 18:59 EST ------- Just found (beware, there is no top-level directory): ftp://ftp.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/wd51we/wgrib/wgrib.tar There is a script src2all which shows how the source files are combined into wgrib.c. And also a makefile which could be used to build wgrib. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 16 00:03:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2006 19:03:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214236] Review Request: php-pear-SOAP - Simple Object Access Protocol (SOAP) Client/Server for PHP In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611160003.kAG03KLp026161@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-SOAP - Simple Object Access Protocol (SOAP) Client/Server for PHP Alias: php-pear-SOAP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214236 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2006-11-15 19:03 EST ------- ==== REVIEW CHECKLIST ==== - rpmlint output clean - package named according to package naming guidelines - spec filename matches %{name} - package meet packaging guidelines - package licensed with open source compatible license - license matches actual license - license file included in %doc - spec written in American english - spec legible - source match upstream 87a26a8abc3ca75fdbe5d307e26102fa SOAP-0.9.4.tgz - successfully compiles and builds on FC6 x86_64 - all build dependencies listed in BR - no locales - no shared libraries - package is not relocatable - package owns all directories it creates - no duplicates in %files - file permissions set properly - contains proper %clean - macro usage is consistent - package contains code - no large documentation - %doc does not affect runtime - no header files or static libraries - no pkgconfig files - no need for devel subpackage - no .la files - not a GUI app needing a .desktop file - package does not own files or directories owned by other packages APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 16 00:04:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2006 19:04:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215200] Review Request: php-pear-Services-Weather - This class acts as an interface to various online weather-services In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611160004.kAG04dVE026259@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Services-Weather - This class acts as an interface to various online weather-services Alias: pear-Svcs-Weather https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215200 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |chris.stone at gmail.com Alias| |pear-Svcs-Weather -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 16 03:57:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2006 22:57:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 212898] Review Request: php-pear-Structures-DataGrid-Renderer-Pager - Renderer driver using PEAR::Pager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611160357.kAG3vbht005939@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Structures-DataGrid-Renderer-Pager - Renderer driver using PEAR::Pager Alias: DG-Renderer-Pager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212898 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2006-11-15 22:57 EST ------- This package is still beta and is probably why there is no documentation yet. I don't think the file name length is a problem unless you are making joilet CDs with extras packages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 16 03:57:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2006 22:57:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 212900] Review Request: php-pear-Structures-DataGrid-Renderer-Smarty - Renderer driver using Smarty In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611160357.kAG3voIM005999@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Structures-DataGrid-Renderer-Smarty - Renderer driver using Smarty Alias: DG-Renderer-Smarty https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212900 Bug 212900 depends on bug 212898, which changed state. Bug 212898 Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Structures-DataGrid-Renderer-Pager - Renderer driver using PEAR::Pager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212898 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 16 04:03:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2006 23:03:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215865] New: Review Request: Zim - Desktop wiki & notekeeper Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215865 Summary: Review Request: Zim - Desktop wiki & notekeeper Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All URL: http://zoidberg.student.utwente.nl/zim/index.shtml OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com SRPM URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/Zim-0.17-1.fc6.src.rpm SPEC URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/Zim.spec Description: Zim is a WYSIWYG text editor written in Gtk2-Perl which aims to bring the concept of a wiki to your desktop. Every page is saved as a text file with wiki markup. Pages can contain links to other pages, and are saved automatically. Creating a new page is as easy as linking to a non-existing page. Pages are ordered in a hierarchical structure that gives it the look and feel of an outliner. This tool is intended to keep track of TODO lists or to serve as a personal scratch book. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 16 04:04:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2006 23:04:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215865] Review Request: Zim - Desktop wiki & notekeeper In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611160404.kAG4461D006279@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Zim - Desktop wiki & notekeeper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215865 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |163776 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 16 04:18:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2006 23:18:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 212900] Review Request: php-pear-Structures-DataGrid-Renderer-Smarty - Renderer driver using Smarty In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611160418.kAG4I3Se007216@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Structures-DataGrid-Renderer-Smarty - Renderer driver using Smarty Alias: DG-Renderer-Smarty https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212900 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2006-11-15 23:18 EST ------- Thanks for the review! :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 16 04:22:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2006 23:22:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215571] Review Request: heliodor - Beryl window decorator with Metacity theme support In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611160422.kAG4MqMI007463@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: heliodor - Beryl window decorator with Metacity theme support https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215571 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-11-15 23:22 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=141338) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=141338&action=view) Mock build log of heliodor 0.1.2-1 I cannot rebuild this by mockbuild on FC-devel i386. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 16 04:43:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2006 23:43:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215165] Review Request: audacious-plugins - Plugins for the Audacious media player In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611160443.kAG4hSPc008461@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: audacious-plugins - Plugins for the Audacious media player https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215165 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-11-15 23:43 EST ------- I dont think you need Obsoletes tag for subpackages -arts, -jack, -esd. Because they are throwing a rpmlint error. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 16 04:55:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2006 23:55:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 203864] Review Request: tripwire - IDS In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611160455.kAG4tMvk008726@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tripwire - IDS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203864 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at theholbrooks.org 2006-11-15 23:55 EST ------- Spec URL: http://theholbrooks.org/RPMS/tripwire.spec SRPM URL: http://theholbrooks.org/RPMS/tripwire-2.4.0.1-2.src.rpm I've addressed the issues you laid out above. Thanks for the thorough review! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 16 05:36:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2006 00:36:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215883] New: Review Request: idioskopos - C++ Introspection Library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215883 Summary: Review Request: idioskopos - C++ Introspection Library Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rvinyard at cs.nmsu.edu QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://miskatonic.cs.nmsu.edu/pub/idioskopos.spec SRPM URL: http://miskatonic.cs.nmsu.edu/pub/idioskopos-0.2.1-1.src.rpm Description: Idioskopos is a C++ introspection library. The next release of the conexus and conexusmm libraries (both in FE already) will depend on this library. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 16 05:38:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2006 00:38:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215569] Review Request: beryl-vidcap - Beryl OpenGL window and compositing manager video capture utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611160538.kAG5cj3P010553@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: beryl-vidcap - Beryl OpenGL window and compositing manager video capture utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215569 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-11-16 00:38 EST ------- Just a quick look at this: * %{_libdir}/beryl/ is not owned by any package. * Fedora specific compilation flags is not passed and -debuginfo rpm is of no use. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 16 06:00:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2006 01:00:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215569] Review Request: beryl-vidcap - Beryl OpenGL window and compositing manager video capture utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611160600.kAG60bSH011231@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: beryl-vidcap - Beryl OpenGL window and compositing manager video capture utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215569 ------- Additional Comments From jwilson at redhat.com 2006-11-16 01:00 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > Just a quick look at this: > > * %{_libdir}/beryl/ is not owned by any package. Actually, it is. Its owned by beryl-plugins. I believe I should have Requires: beryl-plugins. > * Fedora specific compilation flags is not passed Eep. Will add that next build. > -debuginfo rpm is of no use. Hrm, might be the Makefile installing stuff with -s... I'll take a look at fixing all of these in the morning, thanks much! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 16 08:39:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2006 03:39:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 211626] Review Request: xtide - Calculate tide all over the world In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611160839.kAG8dSh6019293@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xtide - Calculate tide all over the world https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211626 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-11-16 03:39 EST ------- (In reply to comment #81) > Does that address everything? I think so. Regarding libtool, it is very easy to use it when also using autoconf/automake, maybe it is less simple without automake, but certainly still doable. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 16 08:42:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2006 03:42:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215165] Review Request: audacious-plugins - Plugins for the Audacious media player In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611160842.kAG8gsdi019595@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: audacious-plugins - Plugins for the Audacious media player https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215165 ------- Additional Comments From redhat-bugzilla at camperquake.de 2006-11-16 03:42 EST ------- The obsoletes are necessary, because the old audacious package provided these extra packages, too, and they need to be replaced on upgrade. Do you refer to the message that the subpackages have Obsoletes:, but no Provides:? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 16 09:07:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2006 04:07:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215165] Review Request: audacious-plugins - Plugins for the Audacious media player In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611160907.kAG97gKL022291@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: audacious-plugins - Plugins for the Audacious media player https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215165 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-11-16 04:07 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > The obsoletes are necessary, because the old audacious package provided these > extra packages, too, and they need to be replaced on upgrade. ok > > Do you refer to the message that the subpackages have Obsoletes:, but no Provides:? Yes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 16 09:26:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2006 04:26:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215165] Review Request: audacious-plugins - Plugins for the Audacious media player In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611160926.kAG9QRvW023872@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: audacious-plugins - Plugins for the Audacious media player https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215165 ------- Additional Comments From redhat-bugzilla at camperquake.de 2006-11-16 04:26 EST ------- I am not sure about this one. For one, there ought to be no packages which Require: audacious-arts, for example, so there is no gain in the new packages Providing: it. In addition, if there were any other packages which actually Require: one of the Obsoleted: packages, they probably need to be rebuilt to match the new codebase, anyway, so there ought to be a RPM conflict. So, in conclusion, I think that this specific rpmlint warning can be ignored. I'd be happy about a third opinion, though. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 16 09:31:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2006 04:31:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214818] Review Request: audacious+audacious-plugins - A GTK2 based media player similar to xmms In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611160931.kAG9VoKH024098@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: audacious+audacious-plugins - A GTK2 based media player similar to xmms https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214818 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-11-16 04:31 EST ------- Dominik, If you sre still following this bug review then i would like to see your comment in bug 215165 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 16 09:38:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2006 04:38:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 211319] Review Request: andutteye-client - Andutteye Software Suite Monitoring agent In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611160938.kAG9ctMe024493@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: andutteye-client - Andutteye Software Suite Monitoring agent https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211319 ------- Additional Comments From faucamp at csir.co.za 2006-11-16 04:38 EST ------- Ok, some comments: * Don't hard-code your %{andutteye_*_dir} paths - this is actually what I meant by using the standard macros. If you want to define these directories as your own macros (i.e. you want to you the %{andutteye_*_dir} macros), then change their definitions so that they use the default macros. Hard-coded directories are problematic; for example: %define andutteye_cfg_dir /etc/andutteye %define andutteye_doc_dir /usr/share/doc/andutteye ...this is incorrect, as RPM will allocate a documentation directory automatically to your package, based on its version-release info, and it will not be "/usr/share/doc/andutteye". And what if the system's configuration directory isn't /etc? Unlikely, yes, but it *is* possible. Rather do something like: %define andutteye_cfg_dir %{_sysconfdir}/andutteye In my opinion, though, I would not use the andutteye_*_dir macros at all, as they add unnecessary complexity to the spec file; instead of using %{andutteye_cfg_dir}, for instance, something like %{_syconfdir}/andutteye is more readable for to other maintainers (and end-users recompiling your package), since almost all other packages use this method. It definitately makes the %files section more readable. * For your documentation, you do not have to (and shouldn't) explicitly copy the files to a doc dir instal %install. Just flag the files as %doc entries in the %files section, and RPM will sort it out automagically :-). For example: %doc opt/andutteye/LICENSE opt/andutteye/README * When installing the application, it generates a lot of noise; this seems to be because of the "andutteyd" and "andutteye-api-linux.pl" script calls in %post. The final package should be quiet during installation, so rather redirect this output to /dev/null * On the %post scripts: I haven't checked exactly what these two scripts do, but they seem to generate a quite a few settings-files; shouldn't these rather be called during %install? (as Fedora systems should provide a similar baseline for detection) You're the expert here, of course, so I might be missing the point completely ;-). * The %post scripts complained when I installed the program on my system: WARNING!! Needed binary:lspci wasnt found in the users $PATH add a path otherwhise andutteye wont work correctly WARNING!! Needed binary:ifconfig wasnt found in the users $PATH add a path otherwhise andutteye wont work correctly On my system: $ whereis lspci lspci: /sbin/lspci /usr/share/man/man8/lspci.8.gz $ whereis ifconfig ifconfig: /sbin/ifconfig /usr/share/man/man8/ifconfig.8.gz Also: $ rpm -qf /sbin/ifconfig net-tools-1.60-73 $ rpm -qf /sbin/lspci pciutils-2.2.3-4 If these two program are needed for andutteyed to function, you need to add those two packages (net-tools and pciutils) to "Requires" in the spec file. (I notice you also use /bin/netstat, which is also part of the net-tools package). The path-issue can be fixed in a variety of ways, like adding it to the andutteye-user's PATH, or applying a patch. Also what about calling this script in %install (as I suggested above)? * In your %post script, for upgrades: /etc/init.d/andutteyed start The package should check whether the andutteyed daemon is currently running, before starting it (maybe the user DOESN't want to have it running at the moment?) Adding "reload" or "condrestart" options to /etc/init.d/andutteyed would be the best solution (and would help to keep rpmlint quiet :-) ) * The package places a log file (andutteye.log) in /var/cache/andutteye; this should go in /var/log * The pid file in /var/run has a typo ;-) (/var/run/anduttyed.pid) * From rpmlint: E: andutteye-client sourced-script-with-shebang /etc/profile.d/aemonitoring.sh This text file contains a shebang, but is meant to be sourced, not executed. -- Solution: remove the shebang E: andutteye-client executable-sourced-script /etc/profile.d/aemonitoring.sh 0755 This text file has executable bit set, but is meant to be sourced, not executed. -- Solution: change the file permission to 0644 W: andutteye-client no-reload-entry /etc/init.d/andutteyed In your init script (/etc/rc.d/init.d/your_file), you don't have a 'reload' entry, which is necessary for good functionality. -- See comment about %post upgrade script, above -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 16 10:39:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2006 05:39:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 212715] Review Request: openvrml - VRML/X3D runtime library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611161039.kAGAdWFI028612@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: openvrml - VRML/X3D runtime library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212715 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2006-11-16 05:39 EST ------- APPROVED - Packaging-wise, this package now looks sufficently well to me. I am going to sponsor you, so you should now proceed with step 10. of http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/Contributors Functionally, I am facing an issue with openvrml-mozilla-plugin and firefox, I don't have an explaination for: After installing "openvrml-mozilla-plugin" and restarting firefox, firefox doesn't show the plugin in "about:plugins", nor does seem to know how to handle *.wrl files. I recall, earlier versions of openvrml and firefox/mozilla did, so I am wondering about what might have happened. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 16 10:40:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2006 05:40:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 212715] Review Request: openvrml - VRML/X3D runtime library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611161040.kAGAelV1028846@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: openvrml - VRML/X3D runtime library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212715 rc040203 at freenet.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 16 12:17:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2006 07:17:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215224] Review Request: gtk-murrine-engine - Murrine GTK2 engine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611161217.kAGCHKGk004744@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtk-murrine-engine - Murrine GTK2 engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215224 tmus at tmus.dk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tmus at tmus.dk ------- Additional Comments From tmus at tmus.dk 2006-11-16 07:17 EST ------- I'm running the gtk-murrine-engine-0.31-1.leofc6 package and it's working great for me... I know there are certain review procedures, but i'm not familiar with these - If you guys need me to try to go through it all, could you please provide a link? Thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 16 13:12:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2006 08:12:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215568] Review Request: beryl-dbus - Beryl OpenGL window and compositing manager dbus plug-in In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611161312.kAGDCbCb009390@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: beryl-dbus - Beryl OpenGL window and compositing manager dbus plug-in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215568 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 16 13:22:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2006 08:22:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215224] Review Request: gtk-murrine-engine - Murrine GTK2 engine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611161322.kAGDMNgJ010071@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtk-murrine-engine - Murrine GTK2 engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215224 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-11-16 08:22 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > I'm running the gtk-murrine-engine-0.31-1.leofc6 package and it's working great > for me... I know there are certain review procedures, but i'm not familiar with > these - If you guys need me to try to go through it all, could you please > provide a link? Thanks http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 16 15:00:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2006 10:00:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 209264] Review Request: emerald-themes - Themes for Emerald, the window decorator for Beryl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611161500.kAGF0ZaI018857@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: emerald-themes - Themes for Emerald, the window decorator for Beryl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209264 mr.ecik at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mr.ecik at gmail.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mr.ecik at gmail.com 2006-11-16 10:00 EST ------- MUST items: * rpmlint is quiet * package is named well * spec file name is good * package meets Packaging Guidelines * package is licensed with a GPL open-source compatible license * License field in spec file matches actual license * license file is included in %doc * md5sums are matching (c5aa35e30d3476f05a469f1baac16341) * package successfully compiles on x86_64 * BuildRequires listed well * no locales * no need to %post and %postun sections * not relocatable * package owns directories well * no duplicates in %files * every %files section includes %defattr * proper %clean section * macros used well This package is obviosly approved :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 16 15:24:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2006 10:24:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215865] Review Request: Zim - Desktop wiki & notekeeper In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611161524.kAGFOX8H020793@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Zim - Desktop wiki & notekeeper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215865 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 16 15:26:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2006 10:26:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 183438] Review Request: idioskopos (C++ Introspection Library) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611161526.kAGFQbQF021031@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: idioskopos (C++ Introspection Library) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183438 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|DEFERRED |DUPLICATE OtherBugsDependingO| |201449 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-11-16 10:26 EST ------- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 215883 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 16 15:26:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2006 10:26:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215883] Review Request: idioskopos - C++ Introspection Library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611161526.kAGFQemv021041@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: idioskopos - C++ Introspection Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215883 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-11-16 10:26 EST ------- *** Bug 183438 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 16 15:28:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2006 10:28:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215865] Review Request: Zim - Desktop wiki & notekeeper In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611161528.kAGFSgFV021127@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Zim - Desktop wiki & notekeeper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215865 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-11-16 10:28 EST ------- I did mock build for FC7 devel i386 and got following in build.log Creating custom builder _build/lib/My/Builder.pm in _build/lib/My WARNING: the following files are missing in your kit: lib/Zim/Win32.pm Please inform the author. AND WARNING: You don't seem to have a mime-info database. The shared-mime-info package is available from http://freedesktop.org/wiki/Software_2fshared_2dmime_2dinfo rpmlint on noarch rpm is not silent Got rpmlint warning on RPM W: Zim hidden-file-or-dir /usr/share/zim/doc/.zim.config The file or directory is hidden. You should see if this is normal, and delete it from the package if not. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 16 15:43:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2006 10:43:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 209264] Review Request: emerald-themes - Themes for Emerald, the window decorator for Beryl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611161543.kAGFhHCM022770@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: emerald-themes - Themes for Emerald, the window decorator for Beryl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209264 ------- Additional Comments From jwilson at redhat.com 2006-11-16 10:43 EST ------- Imported and built for devel, FC6 branch requested. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 16 15:48:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2006 10:48:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 209260] Review Request: beryl-manager - Beryl window decorator and theme management utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611161548.kAGFmZcf023733@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: beryl-manager - Beryl window decorator and theme management utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209260 ------- Additional Comments From mr.ecik at gmail.com 2006-11-16 10:48 EST ------- After a little testing of this package I think that it should have its own desktop file. It is tray application so user should have a possibility to run it from menu. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 16 16:13:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2006 11:13:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 207473] Review Request: ruby-activerecord - Implements the ActiveRecord pattern for ORM In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611161613.kAGGD8ig026180@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-activerecord - Implements the ActiveRecord pattern for ORM https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207473 ------- Additional Comments From dlutter at redhat.com 2006-11-16 11:13 EST ------- I enabled the tests (and added the necessary BR's) I had to make the test running conditional so that the specfile works for RHEL4 too (RHEL4 doesn't have sqlite3) Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/dlutter/yum/spec/ruby-activerecord.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/dlutter/yum/SRPMS/ruby-activerecord-1.14.4-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 16 16:13:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2006 11:13:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 207473] Review Request: ruby-activerecord - Implements the ActiveRecord pattern for ORM In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611161613.kAGGDkb0026374@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-activerecord - Implements the ActiveRecord pattern for ORM https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207473 ------- Additional Comments From dlutter at redhat.com 2006-11-16 11:13 EST ------- I enabled the tests (and added the necessary BR's) I had to make the test running conditional so that the specfile works for RHEL4 too (RHEL4 doesn't have sqlite3) Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/dlutter/yum/spec/ruby-activerecord.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/dlutter/yum/SRPMS/ruby-activerecord-1.14.4-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 16 16:54:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2006 11:54:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215568] Review Request: beryl-dbus - Beryl OpenGL window and compositing manager dbus plug-in In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611161654.kAGGsp2a029861@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: beryl-dbus - Beryl OpenGL window and compositing manager dbus plug-in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215568 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-11-16 11:54 EST ------- Well, 1. From http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines : * BuildRequires: - Well, too much redundant BuildRequires (I don't like this...) All needed are: ------------------------------------------------- beryl-core-devel >= %{version} dbus-devel ++++++++ libXcomposite-devel libXdamage-devel libSM-devel libpng-devel libXext-devel libXinerama-devel startup-notification-devel libXrandr-devel libXrender-devel ++++++++ ------------------------------------------------- Actually these dependency finally 98 minimal build enviroment + 42 other package (tol: 140), while your original package tries to install 276 package. NOTE: The packages between +(plus) symbols, i.e. ------------------------------------------------- libXcomposite-devel libXdamage-devel libSM-devel libpng-devel libXext-devel libXinerama-devel startup-notification-devel libXrandr-devel libXrender-devel ------------------------------------------------- should be required by beryl-core-devel (check /usr/lib/pkgconfig/beryl.pc) so beryl-core-devel package should be fixed. After that this package should only require: -------------------------------------------------- beryl-core-devel >= %{version} dbus-devel -------------------------------------------------- for BuildRequires (I want to check this again so that would you fix beryl-core-devel first?) * Requires: - dbus This is not necessary as libraries' dependency automatically pulls this. 2. Other things I have noticed : * %doc - Well /usr/share/doc/beryl-dbus-0.1.2/ChangeLog says: ------------------------------------------------- see debian/changelog ------------------------------------------------- ... however, where is debian/changelog? 99. For other packages: 99-A For beryl-core package: * Well, rpmlint is not silent. -------------------------------------------------- W: beryl-core undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libberylsettings.so.0.0.0 g_free W: beryl-core undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libberylsettings.so.0.0.0 g_free W: beryl-core undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libberylsettings.so.0.0.0 g_slist_remove W: beryl-core undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libberylsettings.so.0.0.0 g_mkdir_with_parents W: beryl-core undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libberylsettings.so.0.0.0 g_key_file_has_key ....(too much) --------------------------------------------------- Perhaps linking against glib or something else is not correct. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 16 17:16:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2006 12:16:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215865] Review Request: Zim - Desktop wiki & notekeeper In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611161716.kAGHG7bV031677@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Zim - Desktop wiki & notekeeper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215865 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-11-16 12:16 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > I did mock build for FC7 devel i386 and got following in build.log > Creating custom builder _build/lib/My/Builder.pm in _build/lib/My > WARNING: the following files are missing in your kit: > lib/Zim/Win32.pm > Please inform the author. This is normal and expected -- we delete lib/Zim/Win32.pm in %prep as, well, we're not on Win32 :) Keeping it around also causes unwanted Win32 requires to be generated. > AND > WARNING: You don't seem to have a mime-info database. > The shared-mime-info package is available from > http://freedesktop.org/wiki/Software_2fshared_2dmime_2dinfo Good catch -- this looks to be a bug with perl-File-MimeInfo not requiring that package. Bug 215972 filed. I'll add an explicit requires on shared-mime-info to Zim in the meantime, and upload new packages. > rpmlint on noarch rpm is not silent > Got rpmlint warning on RPM > W: Zim hidden-file-or-dir /usr/share/zim/doc/.zim.config > The file or directory is hidden. You should see if this is normal, > and delete it from the package if not. This is normal, if a touch odd -- Zim packages its online help as a zim repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 16 17:19:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2006 12:19:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215865] Review Request: Zim - Desktop wiki & notekeeper In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611161719.kAGHJ4mr032195@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Zim - Desktop wiki & notekeeper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215865 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-11-16 12:19 EST ------- SRPM URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/Zim-0.17-2.fc6.src.rpm SPEC URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/Zim.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 16 17:23:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2006 12:23:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215569] Review Request: beryl-vidcap - Beryl OpenGL window and compositing manager video capture utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611161723.kAGHNS8A032699@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: beryl-vidcap - Beryl OpenGL window and compositing manager video capture utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215569 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 16 17:24:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2006 12:24:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 198562] Review Request: zabbix - Open-source monitoring solution for your IT infrastructure In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611161724.kAGHOeJH000429@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: zabbix - Open-source monitoring solution for your IT infrastructure https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198562 jeff at ocjtech.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|jpmahowald at gmail.com |jeff at ocjtech.us CC| |jpmahowald at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From jeff at ocjtech.us 2006-11-16 12:24 EST ------- John, I hope you don't mind if I reassign this review to myself... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 16 17:26:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2006 12:26:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 198562] Review Request: zabbix - Open-source monitoring solution for your IT infrastructure In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611161726.kAGHQ3Tr000544@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: zabbix - Open-source monitoring solution for your IT infrastructure https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198562 ------- Additional Comments From jeff at ocjtech.us 2006-11-16 12:26 EST ------- * source files match upstream 8e733e41506dd34759daba01deeeefd9 zabbix-1.1.4.tar.gz 8e733e41506dd34759daba01deeeefd9 zabbix-1.1.4.tar.gz.1 * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * dist tag is present. * build root is correct. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. License text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * compiler flags are appropriate. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (fc6 i386). * package installs properly. * rpmlint says: E: zabbix non-standard-uid /var/run/zabbix zabbix E: zabbix non-standard-gid /var/run/zabbix zabbix E: zabbix non-standard-uid /var/log/zabbix zabbix E: zabbix non-standard-gid /var/log/zabbix zabbix E: zabbix-agent non-standard-uid /var/log/zabbix zabbix E: zabbix-agent non-standard-gid /var/log/zabbix zabbix E: zabbix-agent non-standard-uid /var/run/zabbix zabbix E: zabbix-agent non-standard-gid /var/run/zabbix zabbix Can be ignored. E: zabbix-web script-without-shebang /usr/share/zabbix/include/locales/pt_br.inc.php ! fix in %prep with %{__chmod} a-x frontends/php/include/locales/pt_br.inc.php E: zabbix-web wrong-script-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/zabbix/include/locales/pt_br.inc.php ! fix in %prep with %{__sed} -i 's/\r//' frontends/php/include/locales/pt_br.inc.php * %check is not present; There is no test code in the districution. * no shared libraries are present * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * scriptlets are OK * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers * no unversioned .so file * no pkconfig file * no libtool .la droppings. There should be: Requires(pre): /usr/sbin/useradd for both the main package and the agent package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 16 17:58:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2006 12:58:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215224] Review Request: gtk-murrine-engine - Murrine GTK2 engine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611161758.kAGHwBHR004410@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtk-murrine-engine - Murrine GTK2 engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215224 ------- Additional Comments From tmus at tmus.dk 2006-11-16 12:58 EST ------- Thanks a lot... But unless I'm missing something, the Reviewer must currently be maintainer of a package in core or extras (which I'm not). In that case, please accept my input that "the package seems to works as expected". Oh, one other thing - It would actually be really nice, if the package included a logwatch script that could add summary info on postgrey activities. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 16 18:21:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2006 13:21:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 193106] Review Request: gtkmozembedmm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611161821.kAGILSwQ007066@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtkmozembedmm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193106 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-11-16 13:21 EST ------- ok. I guess that makes sense. It will mean that you will have to make sure and keep on top of rebuilding this package against gecko updates, but as long as you are willing to do so thats not a blocker. (As a side note you have a comment in the spec talking about firefox-devel, should update to say gecko-devel). I don't see any further issues/blockers, so this package is APPROVED. Please close this NEXTRELEASE once it's been imported and built. Also, consider doing a review on a waiting package to help spread out the reviewing load. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 16 18:25:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2006 13:25:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214893] Review Request: sipp - SIP test tool / traffic generator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611161825.kAGIPqe1007506@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sipp - SIP test tool / traffic generator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214893 ------- Additional Comments From jeff at ocjtech.us 2006-11-16 13:25 EST ------- First of all, the RPM that you supplied needs to BR ncurses-devel or it won't build in mock. Second, is there are reason that you didn't package 1.1rc6? Version 1.0 is quite old and it looks like there is quite a long time between 1.1rc releases - almost six months between rc5 and rc6. I don't follow sipp development so I don't know why it's taking them so long to make a non-"rc" release. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 16 18:28:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2006 13:28:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214893] Review Request: sipp - SIP test tool / traffic generator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611161828.kAGISckr007973@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sipp - SIP test tool / traffic generator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214893 jeff at ocjtech.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jeff at ocjtech.us OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 16 18:31:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2006 13:31:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 193898] Review Request: Jython - Java source interpreter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611161831.kAGIV4T7008449@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Jython - Java source interpreter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193898 ------- Additional Comments From overholt at redhat.com 2006-11-16 13:30 EST ------- I've taken this over from Igor. I made a few changes and updated to 2.2a1. I've also fixed the mock error you were seeing, Anthony, and added a script to fetch the tarball and explain how to do it. http://people.redhat.com/overholt/jython.spec http://people.redhat.com/overholt/jython-2.2-0.a1.1jpp_1fc.fc7.src.rpm and the differences between my spec and Igor's latest: http://people.redhat.com/overholt/jython.spec.diff -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 16 18:38:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2006 13:38:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 198562] Review Request: zabbix - Open-source monitoring solution for your IT infrastructure In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611161838.kAGIcDbF009224@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: zabbix - Open-source monitoring solution for your IT infrastructure https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198562 ------- Additional Comments From jwilson at redhat.com 2006-11-16 13:38 EST ------- (In reply to comment #22) [...] > E: zabbix-web script-without-shebang /usr/share/zabbix/include/locales/pt_br.inc.php > > ! fix in %prep with %{__chmod} a-x frontends/php/include/locales/pt_br.inc.php > > E: zabbix-web wrong-script-end-of-line-encoding > /usr/share/zabbix/include/locales/pt_br.inc.php > > ! fix in %prep with %{__sed} -i 's/\r//' frontends/php/include/locales/pt_br.inc.php Ugh. Musta been added to one of the recent builds, rpmlint used to be silent... That's what I get for not linting new builds... :) > There should be: > > Requires(pre): /usr/sbin/useradd > > for both the main package and the agent package. Damn, missed that one... Okay, new build should fix all of the above. http://wilsonet.com/packages/zabbix/zabbix-1.1.4-2.fc6.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 16 18:42:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2006 13:42:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215792] Review Request: wgrib - Manipulate, inventory and decode GRIB files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611161842.kAGIgpPN009720@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wgrib - Manipulate, inventory and decode GRIB files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215792 ------- Additional Comments From orion at cora.nwra.com 2006-11-16 13:42 EST ------- Think the version is right, previous versions are like 1.7.3.1, 1.8.0.9g. Did you get this output from testbin.f: bad values: 1.0116254E-40 I'm thinking of not using testbin.f because I don't really want to be debugging one test program when another works. Also, do you really think it makes sense to ship testbin.c and land.grb or just use it in %check? I checked out the tar file before, but it seems to be version 1.8.0.12g which is marked as "beta" on the main web page. The full C file seems to be the preferred "release" mechanism and the makefile shipped with the tar file is pretty useless as well. Here's the latest: http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/wgrib-1.8.0.12b-2.fc6.src.rpm As for branches, I'd like to do FC-5 on. Will need to coordinate with your grads package obviously. Thanks for the review! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 16 18:46:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2006 13:46:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215224] Review Request: gtk-murrine-engine - Murrine GTK2 engine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611161846.kAGIkFgP010032@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtk-murrine-engine - Murrine GTK2 engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215224 ------- Additional Comments From tmus at tmus.dk 2006-11-16 13:46 EST ------- argh - please disregard the last two lines of previous post as a bug mixup! My apologies. ...And just to clarify - the gtk-murrine-engine package is working perfectly for me too. ;-/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 16 18:48:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2006 13:48:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 198562] Review Request: zabbix - Open-source monitoring solution for your IT infrastructure In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611161848.kAGImDc1010128@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: zabbix - Open-source monitoring solution for your IT infrastructure https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198562 jeff at ocjtech.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jeff at ocjtech.us 2006-11-16 13:48 EST ------- APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 16 18:53:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2006 13:53:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 198562] Review Request: zabbix - Open-source monitoring solution for your IT infrastructure In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611161853.kAGIrE1t010619@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: zabbix - Open-source monitoring solution for your IT infrastructure https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198562 ------- Additional Comments From jwilson at redhat.com 2006-11-16 13:53 EST ------- Excellent, thanks much, importing shortly... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 16 18:55:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2006 13:55:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215224] Review Request: gtk-murrine-engine - Murrine GTK2 engine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611161855.kAGItDkk010744@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtk-murrine-engine - Murrine GTK2 engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215224 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-11-16 13:55 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > Thanks a lot... > > But unless I'm missing something, the Reviewer must currently be maintainer of a > package in core or extras (which I'm not). Well that may prevent you from being the formal reviewer of the package but it doesn't stop you going through the checklist and pointing out anything that you notice (if you wish); that would result in any issues getting found and fixed before someone came along to formally review the package, which in turn would speed up the formal review process. It would also get you some credit with potential sponsors should you some day want to become a Fedora maintainer :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 16 18:55:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2006 13:55:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215445] Review Request: netcdf-decoder Converts WMO GRIB products into NetCDF files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611161855.kAGItcDB010788@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: netcdf-decoder Converts WMO GRIB products into NetCDF files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215445 ------- Additional Comments From orion at cora.nwra.com 2006-11-16 13:55 EST ------- > Bad: > - Can't install becouse perlNetCDF) is required. perl(NetCDF) is under review in bug 215444, which this depends on. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 16 18:57:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2006 13:57:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215568] Review Request: beryl-dbus - Beryl OpenGL window and compositing manager dbus plug-in In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611161857.kAGIvYdA011011@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: beryl-dbus - Beryl OpenGL window and compositing manager dbus plug-in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215568 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-11-16 13:57 EST ------- Well, it seems that you write many unneeded BuildRequires on beryl-related packages, which should be fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 16 19:00:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2006 14:00:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215659] Review Request: python-daap - A DAAP client implemented in Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611161900.kAGJ0CAc011378@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-daap - A DAAP client implemented in Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215659 Jochen at herr-schmitt.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From Jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2006-11-16 14:00 EST ------- Good: + Rpmlint doesn't complaints the source package. + Local build works fine. + Rpmlint doesn't complaints the binary package. + Tar Ball matches with upstream. + Local Install/Uninstall works fine. Bad: - Strange License tag which refer to a non existing License file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 16 19:00:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2006 14:00:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215568] Review Request: beryl-dbus - Beryl OpenGL window and compositing manager dbus plug-in In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611161900.kAGJ0lJr011461@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: beryl-dbus - Beryl OpenGL window and compositing manager dbus plug-in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215568 ------- Additional Comments From jwilson at redhat.com 2006-11-16 14:00 EST ------- Thanks much for the leg-work! I'll work on cleaning that all up. I think I copied over the beryl-core spec to the first sub-package, and largely left the BR in place, should have trimmed them then. I'll fix up beryl-core-devel's dependencies first up, then work on the rest... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 16 19:08:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2006 14:08:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214527] Review Request: perl-HTML-Table - Create HTML tables using simple interface In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611161908.kAGJ8TvY011971@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-HTML-Table - Create HTML tables using simple interface https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214527 orion at cora.nwra.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From orion at cora.nwra.com 2006-11-16 14:08 EST ------- Thanks for the review. Checked in and added to owners.list. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 16 19:25:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2006 14:25:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215659] Review Request: python-daap - A DAAP client implemented in Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611161925.kAGJPZAe013514@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-daap - A DAAP client implemented in Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215659 Jochen at herr-schmitt.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |Jochen at herr-schmitt.de -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 16 19:35:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2006 14:35:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215563] Review Request: aquamarine - Themeable window decorator and compositing manager for Beryl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611161935.kAGJZwB7014550@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aquamarine - Themeable window decorator and compositing manager for Beryl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215563 mr.ecik at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mr.ecik at gmail.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mr.ecik at gmail.com 2006-11-16 14:35 EST ------- I think this package may be approved, the only problem is a lack of license file so I'm not able to check if aquamarine is really GPL ;) I'll do a full review later. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 16 19:47:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2006 14:47:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215569] Review Request: beryl-vidcap - Beryl OpenGL window and compositing manager video capture utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611161947.kAGJlHi5016001@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: beryl-vidcap - Beryl OpenGL window and compositing manager video capture utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215569 ------- Additional Comments From jwilson at redhat.com 2006-11-16 14:47 EST ------- I have yet to figure out why there's no source files being included in the debuginfo package, but it does have .debug files in it... (Also need to trim down the BuildReqs per your comments in the beryl-vidcap bug). But I have pushed a new build that adds a dep on beryl-plugins and enabled the proper compile flags: http://wilsonet.com/packages/beryl/beryl-vidcap-0.1.2-5.fc6.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 16 19:51:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2006 14:51:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215563] Review Request: aquamarine - Themeable window decorator and compositing manager for Beryl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611161951.kAGJpxqR016592@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aquamarine - Themeable window decorator and compositing manager for Beryl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215563 ------- Additional Comments From mr.ecik at gmail.com 2006-11-16 14:51 EST ------- MUST items: * rpmlint output: W: aquamarine no-documentation (no documentation provided by upstream) * package is named well * spec file name is good * package meets Packaging Guidelines ?* package is licensed with an GPL open-source compatible license ?* License field in spec file matches actual license * license file isn't included in %doc * no upstream release, unable to check md5 * package successfully compiles on x86_64 * BuildRequires listed well (mock builds successfully) * no locales * no need to %post and %postun sections * not relocatable * no duplicates in %files * every %files section includes %defattr * proper %clean section * macros used well License is not included in a package, I couldn't find any reliable site to check its license. Thus, if you show me a place where the license's written, I'll be happy to approve this package :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 16 20:10:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2006 15:10:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215224] Review Request: gtk-murrine-engine - Murrine GTK2 engine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611162010.kAGKAtTQ018372@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtk-murrine-engine - Murrine GTK2 engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215224 ------- Additional Comments From tmus at tmus.dk 2006-11-16 15:10 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=141408) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=141408&action=view) my review of the package There are a few places that I did not review (the places are marked), but this review should still save some time for the primary reviewer and others... I do apologize if some kind of review-template is already available - hope this makes sense anyway! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 16 20:21:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2006 15:21:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214967] Review Request: arpack - Fortran77 subroutines for solving large scale eigenvalue problems In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611162021.kAGKLcvl019857@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: arpack - Fortran77 subroutines for solving large scale eigenvalue problems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214967 orion at cora.nwra.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |orion at cora.nwra.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From orion at cora.nwra.com 2006-11-16 15:21 EST ------- Changing blocker to FE-REVIEW since it seems to be under review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 16 20:34:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2006 15:34:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215224] Review Request: gtk-murrine-engine - Murrine GTK2 engine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611162034.kAGKY12E021059@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtk-murrine-engine - Murrine GTK2 engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215224 ------- Additional Comments From sdl.web at gmail.com 2006-11-16 15:33 EST ------- spec file updated. Thanks for your input. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 16 20:39:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2006 15:39:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215568] Review Request: beryl-dbus - Beryl OpenGL window and compositing manager dbus plug-in In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611162039.kAGKd8h1021645@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: beryl-dbus - Beryl OpenGL window and compositing manager dbus plug-in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215568 ------- Additional Comments From jwilson at redhat.com 2006-11-16 15:39 EST ------- Okay, I've got a new build of beryl-dbus that has only BR: beryl-core-devel and dbus-devel, and it builds perfectly in mock, with an updated beryl-core that adds all the other bits as requirements of beryl-core-devel. I've also deleted the ChangeLog file from %doc, I don't see debian/changelog anywhere in the tarball (this project is, um, a little lax on docs...). I haven't yet pushed a build of that updated beryl-core version through Extras though, as I want to trim the BR on all the othe beryl bits first. http://wilsonet.com/packages/beryl/beryl-dbus-0.1.2-3.fc6.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 16 20:48:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2006 15:48:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215224] Review Request: gtk-murrine-engine - Murrine GTK2 engine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611162048.kAGKm4o2022537@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtk-murrine-engine - Murrine GTK2 engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215224 ------- Additional Comments From karlthered at gmail.com 2006-11-16 15:48 EST ------- Even if you're not a sponsor or neither an Extras maintainers shouldn't stop you from reviewing packages. It might help accelerating the reviewing process. :o) Leon have you been sponsored ? By the way, you should use your real name and not an alias in the spec. OK - Package name OK - Spec file matches base package name. OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines. OK - License (GPL) OK - License field in spec matches OK - License file included in package OK - Spec in American English OK - Spec is legible. See below - Sources match upstream md5sum (1) OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch. OK - BuildRequires correct OK - Spec has needed ldconfig in post and postun OK - Package owns all the directories it creates. OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files. OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. OK - Package has a correct %clean section. OK - Spec has consistant macro usage. OK - Package is code or permissible content. OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime. OK - Headers/static libs in -devel subpackage. OK - .pc files in -devel subpackage. OK - .so files in -devel subpackage. OK - -devel package Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} OK - .la files are removed. OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. See below - No rpmlint output. (2) SHOULD Items: OK - Should include License or ask upstream to include it. OK - Should build in mock. 1. I haven't found download link for these themes MurrinaBlack and MurrinaTango on murrine website. Could you provide them in order to check md5sum ? Is there any reason not to package other themes ? 2. you should think about splitting the package, something like that - gtk-murrine-engine: the gtk engine (plus maybe the configurator script available on the website ?) - gnome-themes-murrine-bigpack: gnome murrine themes pack It will ease your future work as maintainer. 3. It lacks rpmlint output: $ rpmlint -i gtk-murrine-engine-0.31-1.leofc5.i386.rpm W: gtk-murrine-engine summary-ended-with-dot Murrine GTK2 engine. Summary ends with a dot. W: gtk-murrine-engine incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.30.2 0.31-1 The last entry in %changelog contains a version identifier that is not coherent with the epoch:version-release tuple of the package. E: gtk-murrine-engine script-without-shebang /usr/share/themes/Murrina-Black/gtk-2.0/gtkrc This text file has executable bits set or is located in a path dedicated for executables, but lacks a shebang and cannot thus be executed. If the file is meant to be an executable script, add the shebang, otherwise remove the executable bits or move the file elsewhere. These are easily fixable. Has anyone tested the package on another supported hardware platforms such as x86_64 ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 16 20:48:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2006 15:48:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 211319] Review Request: andutteye-client - Andutteye Software Suite Monitoring agent In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611162048.kAGKmQdj022639@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: andutteye-client - Andutteye Software Suite Monitoring agent https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211319 ------- Additional Comments From andreas.utterberg at thundera.se 2006-11-16 15:48 EST ------- Thanx for the input and the snip codes, its a great help to know what the things should be changed to. I think its close now, i have implemented all of your changes above... almost :). Good idea with the baseline configuration. -genconfig creates a configuration based on your system, which processes that are started, which filesystems that are mounted etc and crates a config. But with a baseline the user can get examples on all types of the AES monitor framework, which can be an even better start to learn the design and how it workes. The user can always execute andutteyed -genconfig manually to rediscover the system and create a new configuration. The generation phase creates, and andutteyed only uses one config file that is located under /etc/andutteye/andutteyed.conf. The andutteye <-> api communication is initiated when andutteyed (that contains the AES logic) needs the recive some information from the operatingsystem. The enviroment parameters set in /etc/profile.d/aemonitoring.sh is setting which os (and which os api to use) andutteyed is running on. I have uploaded new packages and spec file, rpmlint is now silent. Hopefully a good thing ;). I have two questions though. The agent is running as the normal andutteye user and dont have permission to create and append to a log file under /var/log. What approach should i use to over come that? The andutteye user should have /sbin in its PATH so that all statistics can be retrived. This is only nessasary if the agent is connected to a AES server though. What is the best approach for this? New packages and spec file. http://www.andutteye.com/download/andutteye-client.spec http://www.andutteye.com/download/andutteye-client-2.3-10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 16 21:07:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2006 16:07:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215792] Review Request: wgrib - Manipulate, inventory and decode GRIB files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611162107.kAGL7t9o024387@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wgrib - Manipulate, inventory and decode GRIB files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215792 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-11-16 16:07 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > Think the version is right, previous versions are like 1.7.3.1, 1.8.0.9g. Ok. > Did you get this output from testbin.f: > > bad values: 1.0116254E-40 Yes. From my tests it seems to be for the very latest point, maybe an error in the test script. > I'm thinking of not using testbin.f because I don't really want to be debugging > one test program when another works. Also, do you really think it makes sense > to ship testbin.c and land.grb or just use it in %check? Both would make sense in my opinion. I think that those files would be rightly in %doc (and also testbin.f). > I checked out the tar file before, but it seems to be version 1.8.0.12g which is > marked as "beta" on the main web page. The full C file seems to be the > preferred "release" mechanism and the makefile shipped with the tar file is > pretty useless as well. Ok, I thought it was the corresponding wgrib.c. In fact the Changes file is misleading, and that's because of that file that I thought that that the shipped version was 1.8.0.12g. I proposed the tar file because there are already some files shipped in that tar and it could remove the need to ship some of the files individually. Somethingn should be done for the Changes file. > Here's the latest: > http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/wgrib-1.8.0.12b-2.fc6.src.rpm > > As for branches, I'd like to do FC-5 on. Will need to coordinate with your > grads package obviously. Ok. It's already done for devel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 16 21:21:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2006 16:21:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214830] Review Request: Limph - PHP network host monitor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611162121.kAGLLDal025226@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Limph - PHP network host monitor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214830 orion at cora.nwra.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |orion at cora.nwra.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776, 177841 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From orion at cora.nwra.com 2006-11-16 16:21 EST ------- Initial comments: - BAD: md5sum does not match upstream. - Need full URL for source (http://prdownloads.sf.net/limph/limph-%{version}.tar.gz - Please, BuildArch: not BuildArchitectures: $ rpmlint ~/Desktop/limph-1.9.3-1.src.rpm W: limph strange-permission limph-hostagent 0755 - perhaps just change the permission with "install"? E: limph use-of-RPM_SOURCE_DIR - Instead of "$RPM_SOURCE_DIR/limph.conf", use %SOURCE1, etc. - should add to limph.conf: Order Deny,Allow Deny from all Allow from 127.0.0.1 - More rpmlint: # rpmlint limph E: limph file-in-usr-marked-as-conffile /usr/share/limph/config.php E: limph file-in-usr-marked-as-conffile /usr/share/limph/input.php - move to /etc/limph. Is input.php really a config file? E: limph world-writable /usr/share/limph/tmp 0777 E: limph non-standard-dir-perm /usr/share/limph/tmp 0777 - These should only be writable by limph. # rpmlint limph-hostagent E: limph-hostagent file-in-usr-marked-as-conffile /usr/share/limph/host_agent.php - same here. Maybe put $secret into a config file in /etc/limph and include that? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 16 22:00:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2006 17:00:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215224] Review Request: gtk-murrine-engine - Murrine GTK2 engine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611162200.kAGM0WId028019@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtk-murrine-engine - Murrine GTK2 engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215224 ------- Additional Comments From sdl.web at gmail.com 2006-11-16 17:00 EST ------- Updated spec: http://www.srcf.ucam.org/~sl392/fedora/SRPMs/gtk-murrine-engine.spec Updated SRPM: http://www.srcf.ucam.org/~sl392/fedora/SRPMs/gtk-murrine-engine-0.31-2.leofc5.src.rpm I am not sponsored by anyone. 1. Themes are downloaded from gnome-look.org. The tree themes included are chosen for their popularity. MurrinaTango: http://www.gnome-look.org/content/show.php?content=47709 Murrina-Black: http://www.gnome-look.org/content/show.php?content=46287 MurrinaGilouche: http://www.gnome-look.org/content/show.php?content=44510 2. Splitting seems unnecessary. 3. All fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 16 22:39:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2006 17:39:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215569] Review Request: beryl-vidcap - Beryl OpenGL window and compositing manager video capture utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611162239.kAGMd3X4030670@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: beryl-vidcap - Beryl OpenGL window and compositing manager video capture utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215569 ------- Additional Comments From jwilson at redhat.com 2006-11-16 17:38 EST ------- New build with trimmed BR: (requires new beryl-core-devel, which I haven't pushed yet).: http://wilsonet.com/packages/beryl/beryl-vidcap-0.1.2-6.fc6.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 16 23:12:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2006 18:12:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215659] Review Request: python-daap - A DAAP client implemented in Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611162312.kAGNCqbw001698@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-daap - A DAAP client implemented in Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215659 ------- Additional Comments From jeff at ocjtech.us 2006-11-16 18:12 EST ------- Spec URL: http://repo.ocjtech.us/misc/fedora/6/SRPMS/python-daap-0.4-2.fc6.spec SRPM URL: http://repo.ocjtech.us/misc/fedora/6/SRPMS/python-daap-0.4-2.fc6.src.rpm I've added a copy of the license text and clarified the comment regarding the license. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 16 23:37:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2006 18:37:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215563] Review Request: aquamarine - Themeable window decorator and compositing manager for Beryl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611162337.kAGNb17d003171@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aquamarine - Themeable window decorator and compositing manager for Beryl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215563 ------- Additional Comments From jwilson at redhat.com 2006-11-16 18:36 EST ------- Only place I'm seeing anything about the license is currently in the source code itself (src/aquamarine.cpp): /* * Aquamarine the KDE window decorator * * Copyright (c) 2006 Dennis Kasprzyk * Copyright (c) 2006 Volker Krause * * Uses code of: * Emerald window decorator (www.beryl-project.org) * KWin window manager (www.kde.org) * * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by * the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or * (at your option) any later version. * * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the * GNU General Public License for more details. * * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License * along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software * Foundation, Inc., 51 Franklin Street, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110-1301, USA. * */ So it *is* GPL, they just haven't got around to putting evidence of that somewhere sensible yet. :) Also, there's a new build that has trimmed down BR (needs beryl-core-devel >= 0.1.2-5): http://wilsonet.com/packages/beryl/aquamarine-0.1.2-2.fc6.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 16 23:37:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2006 18:37:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215564] Review Request: bdock - Beryl project's replacement windowmaker dock In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611162337.kAGNbHTO003198@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bdock - Beryl project's replacement windowmaker dock https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215564 ------- Additional Comments From jwilson at redhat.com 2006-11-16 18:37 EST ------- New build with trimmed-down BR: (needs beryl-core-devel >= 0.1.2-5). http://wilsonet.com/packages/beryl/bdock-0.1.2-3.fc6.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 16 23:46:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2006 18:46:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215571] Review Request: heliodor - Beryl window decorator with Metacity theme support In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611162346.kAGNkr25003585@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: heliodor - Beryl window decorator with Metacity theme support https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215571 ------- Additional Comments From jwilson at redhat.com 2006-11-16 18:46 EST ------- Here's an updated build with trimmed down BR:. It builds in FC6/x86_64 mock for me, will double-check with devel builds tomorrow, if you don't beat me to it (gotta run for the night). http://wilsonet.com/packages/beryl/heliodor-0.1.2-2.fc6.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 17 00:12:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2006 19:12:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 198562] Review Request: zabbix - Open-source monitoring solution for your IT infrastructure In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611170012.kAH0Cvft005243@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: zabbix - Open-source monitoring solution for your IT infrastructure https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198562 ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2006-11-16 19:12 EST ------- (In reply to comment #21) > John, I hope you don't mind if I reassign this review to myself... > Not at all, I was getting behind on the builds. I agree with the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 17 02:22:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2006 21:22:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214967] Review Request: arpack - Fortran77 subroutines for solving large scale eigenvalue problems In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611170222.kAH2MsKu010884@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: arpack - Fortran77 subroutines for solving large scale eigenvalue problems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214967 rpm at greysector.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rpm at greysector.net ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2006-11-16 21:22 EST ------- I seem to remember building arpack privately for some other software. I'm interested in seeing this in Extras, too. If Quentin doesn't have the time to review this, I can do it in a few days. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 17 02:41:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2006 21:41:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215165] Review Request: audacious-plugins - Plugins for the Audacious media player In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611170241.kAH2fhBa011974@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: audacious-plugins - Plugins for the Audacious media player https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215165 rpm at greysector.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rpm at greysector.net ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2006-11-16 21:41 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > So, in conclusion, I think that this specific rpmlint warning can be ignored. > I'd be happy about a third opinion, though. I think it can be ignored, too. I have another comment, however. I know it's a matter of preference, but why not put each BuildRequired package in its own line and sort the list alphabetically? It makes it easier to spot missing builddeps, for example: fluidsynth-devel and libglade2-devel. The package doesn't build here without the latter. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 17 02:51:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2006 21:51:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214967] Review Request: arpack - Fortran77 subroutines for solving large scale eigenvalue problems In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611170251.kAH2pXMK012433@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: arpack - Fortran77 subroutines for solving large scale eigenvalue problems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214967 ------- Additional Comments From qspencer at ieee.org 2006-11-16 21:51 EST ------- The main thing stopping the review at this point is clarification about the odd licensing terms. I sent an e-mail to the "official" arpack address last week asking for clarification and have received no response. I found an e-mail for one of the authors and tried to contact him directly today. I think I'll try to track down the others as well. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 17 03:45:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2006 22:45:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 211626] Review Request: xtide - Calculate tide all over the world In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611170345.kAH3jL3X015745@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xtide - Calculate tide all over the world https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211626 ------- Additional Comments From dave at flaterco.com 2006-11-16 22:45 EST ------- I'm finding success with automake and libtool. For libtool, is it still safe to start my libtcd.so version-info at 0:0:0 or will this conflict with previously deployed Fedora packages? What's a safe "current" number to start with? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 17 04:15:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2006 23:15:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 193898] Review Request: Jython - Java source interpreter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611170415.kAH4FCUk018142@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Jython - Java source interpreter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193898 ------- Additional Comments From ifoox at redhat.com 2006-11-16 23:15 EST ------- Andrew, thanks for taking care of this. Unfortunately I couldn't find the time to deal with it lately. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 17 04:30:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2006 23:30:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 211626] Review Request: xtide - Calculate tide all over the world In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611170430.kAH4U6RN019532@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xtide - Calculate tide all over the world https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211626 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2006-11-16 23:30 EST ------- (In reply to comment #85) > I'm finding success with automake and libtool. For libtool, is it still safe to > start my libtcd.so version-info at 0:0:0 or will this conflict with previously > deployed Fedora packages? Don't care about the Fedora packages. You are the upstream. It's you who has the liberty to choose them to your personal preference. Those people who released different versions with different SONAMEs were not legitmated to do so and committed a mistaked. Also their choices should not be a problem, because no packages have been released so far. > What's a safe "current" number to start with? For general recommendations, you might want to read: info libtool Versioning 0:0.0 should be fine. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 17 04:32:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2006 23:32:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 211626] Review Request: xtide - Calculate tide all over the world In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611170432.kAH4WQ8Y019738@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xtide - Calculate tide all over the world https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211626 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2006-11-16 23:32 EST ------- (In reply to comment #86) > 0:0.0 should be fine. Of cause, I meant 0:0:0 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 17 04:38:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2006 23:38:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 211626] Review Request: xtide - Calculate tide all over the world In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611170438.kAH4cI9K020234@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xtide - Calculate tide all over the world https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211626 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-11-16 23:38 EST ------- (In reply to comment #85) > What's a safe "current" number to start with? It is up to your choice. I will repackage xtide according to your packaging. Only you have to take care of is that soname should be changed according to the source code change, especially API change. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 17 07:05:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2006 02:05:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215571] Review Request: heliodor - Beryl window decorator with Metacity theme support In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611170705.kAH75Wa5027462@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: heliodor - Beryl window decorator with Metacity theme support https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215571 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-11-17 02:05 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=141451) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=141451&action=view) Mock build log of heliodor 0.1.2-2 Umm.. still not okay on FC-devel i386. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 17 07:08:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2006 02:08:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215865] Review Request: Zim - Desktop wiki & notekeeper In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611170708.kAH78sxe027588@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Zim - Desktop wiki & notekeeper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215865 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-11-17 02:08 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (development i386)FC7. + rpmlint is silent for SRPM. + rpmlint on noarch rpm is not silent Got rpmlint warning on RPM W: Zim hidden-file-or-dir /usr/share/zim/doc/.zim.config Which can be ignored. + source files match upstream. b665ab613fc777073e14b5eee44f37d9 Zim-0.17.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. License text included in package. + %doc is small; no -doc subpackage required. + %doc does not affect runtime. + COPYING included in %doc. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc files. + no -devel subpackage exists + no .la files. + no translations available + owns the directories it creates. + doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + Desktop file installed succesfully + Desktop file is handled correclty in SPEC file. + GUI app APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 17 07:12:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2006 02:12:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215865] Review Request: Zim - Desktop wiki & notekeeper In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611170712.kAH7CD6Y027738@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Zim - Desktop wiki & notekeeper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215865 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-11-17 02:12 EST ------- COLSE bug once you import this package in CVS -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 17 08:32:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2006 03:32:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215569] Review Request: beryl-vidcap - Beryl OpenGL window and compositing manager video capture utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611170832.kAH8Wlml031854@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: beryl-vidcap - Beryl OpenGL window and compositing manager video capture utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215569 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-11-17 03:32 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=141457) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=141457&action=view) spec file to try to aviod using chrpath Well, using chrpath is somewhat unwilling, I think. How do you think about the spec file I attached? Note: The change for 'make' command in %install process is needed to pass fedora specific compilation flags. NOTE: I only checked about chrpath and $RPM_OPT_FLAGS issues and not checked anything else!! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 17 08:38:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2006 03:38:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215569] Review Request: beryl-vidcap - Beryl OpenGL window and compositing manager video capture utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611170838.kAH8c2ux032268@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: beryl-vidcap - Beryl OpenGL window and compositing manager video capture utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215569 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #141457|0 |1 is obsolete| | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-11-17 03:38 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=141458) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=141458&action=view) spec file (more correct) Perhaps more correct spec file (use exec) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 17 08:39:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2006 03:39:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215569] Review Request: beryl-vidcap - Beryl OpenGL window and compositing manager video capture utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611170839.kAH8dKBL032386@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: beryl-vidcap - Beryl OpenGL window and compositing manager video capture utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215569 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #141458|application/octet-stream |text/plain mime type| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 17 10:01:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2006 05:01:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 211319] Review Request: andutteye-client - Andutteye Software Suite Monitoring agent In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611171001.kAHA1n4r005871@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: andutteye-client - Andutteye Software Suite Monitoring agent https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211319 ------- Additional Comments From faucamp at csir.co.za 2006-11-17 05:01 EST ------- Many improvements! :-) This is really coming along well. Your 2 questions: > The agent is running as the normal andutteye user and dont have permission to > create and append to a log file under /var/log. What approach should i use to > over come that? You can create the log file during %install (using touch or something similar), and change its ownership to the andutteye user, or you can create a "andutteye" or "andutteyed" subdir in /var/log, with ownership set to the andutteyed user; in this case you can simply own the directory itself in %files. You also need to create a entry in /etc/logrotate.d to control the size of the log file(s); this can also be used to set ownership/permissions, etc (look at existing configurations in /etc/logrotate.d for examples; yum has a simple but effective entry, ppp as well). > The andutteye user should have /sbin in its PATH so that all statistics can be > retrived. This is only nessasary if the agent is connected to a AES server > though. What is the best approach for this? The user account that gets created should actually be a system account, i.e. not one that a "normal" user can be used to log in as. You can use something like: %pre # Create system account /usr/sbin/useradd -g andutteye \ -c "Andutteye Software Suite monitoring server" -r -M -s '' \ -d %{_localstatedir}/cache/andutteye andutteye &>/dev/null || : Note the -r flag there (for creating a system account), and setting the home directory to /var/cache/andutteye. Since this service is then started as a system account by init, it *should* include /sbin/ in its PATH... Let me know how it goes - I'm very rusty on this, so if anyone knows better, please advise. Some other stuff: * %doc entries: permissions are incorrect (0644, should be 0755) - by the way, you can (if you like) place all the doc entries in one %doc statement, by seperating them with spaces * Man pages are installed in the wrong location (they are not accessible). Suggested fix: %install [...snip...] mkdir -p %{buildroot}%{_mandir}/man1 install -p -m 0755 usr/share/man/man1/* %{buildroot}%{_mandir}/man1 [...snip...] %files [...snip...] %{_mandir}/man1/* [...snip...] * I've been delaying mentioning this, but your Source statement needs to have some sort of information on HOW to obtain the source tarball. Usually this is done by specifying the full URL where the source file(s) can be downloaded, i.e. Source0: http://www.andutteye.com/download/andutteye-client-%{version}-%{release}.tar.gz There is a slight problem here, though. I've noticed that you increment a "release" tag of the source tarball for each successive RPM build (to synchronize the two releases). This is your choice, of course (you're the author, after all), but does anything actually change in the tar.gz release? It would be easier to maintain this package if you leave the "release" tag to indicate *RPM* releases, and just keep a "version" tag for the tarball (this is how it usually works, anyhow). So, in short, how it usually works: RPM packages foo-1.3-1, foo-1.3-5, foo-1.3-6 all use the same source: foo-1.3.tar.gz The different "release" tags merely state that something specific to the RPM has changed, not the upstream program. In this fashion, if the source tarball changes (say, to foo-1.3.1.tar.gz), the RPM's release tag is reset, so the RPM package becomes foo-1.3.1-1.tar.gz. Notice that the release tag only shows changes in the RPM itself (specfile changes, etc), not changes in the upstream source. And everytime the source changes, RPM's release tag goes back to 1. This is a packaging rule in Fedora, so if you decide to keep the "-release" in the upstream tarball, you have to put that into your "Version" tag in the spec, and change the "-" character to something else, perhaps a '.'. In other words, for the tarball andutteye-client-2.3-7.tar.gz (on the website), the resulting RPM package should be something like: andutteye-client-2.3.7-1.noarch.rpm or andutteye-client-2.3_7-1.noarch.rpm * rpmlint isn't silent (run it on the binary rpm, not the .src.rpm :-) ), but a lot of the output has to do with the andutteye user account, as well as the man-page stuff. Some interesting entries that need to be addressed: E: andutteye-client non-readable /etc/andutteye/andutteyed.conf 0640 W: andutteye-client non-conffile-in-etc /etc/andutteye/andutteyed.conf -- change the permissions for this file, and mark it as %conf in %files W: andutteye-client service-default-enabled /etc/init.d/andutteyed -- I don't have enough experience to comment on this. Depending on the service, it may or may not be a good thing to have this specific service enabled by default. In your case, I'm leaning towards "ok", but I'm sure your sponsor will be able to advise you better on this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 17 10:05:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2006 05:05:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 208169] Review Request: python-twisted-core - An asynchronous networking framework written in Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611171005.kAHA5ONr006058@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-twisted-core - An asynchronous networking framework written in Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208169 ------- Additional Comments From thomas at apestaart.org 2006-11-17 05:05 EST ------- so, poll time. Should I already request builds for FC6 and devel, or should we first move on with the rest of the twisted stack until we have a feature-complete replacement for the FC-5 complete python-twisted package ? Creating tickets for the next packages -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 17 10:09:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2006 05:09:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216102] New: Review Request: python-twisted-conch - Twisted SSHv2 implementation Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216102 Summary: Review Request: python-twisted-conch - Twisted SSHv2 implementation Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: thomas at apestaart.org QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://thomas.apestaart.org/download/pkg/fedora-5-x86_64-extras/python-twisted-conch-0.7.0-3.fc5/python-twisted-conch.spec SRPM URL: http://thomas.apestaart.org/download/pkg/fedora-5-x86_64-extras/python-twisted-conch-0.7.0-3.fc5/python-twisted-conch-0.7.0-3.fc5.src.rpm Description: Twisted is an event-based framework for internet applications. Conch is an SSHv2 implementation written in Python. SSH is a protocol designed to allow remote access to shells and commands, but it is generic enough to allow everything from TCP forwarding to generic filesystem access. Since conch is written in Python, it interfaces well with other Python projects, such as Imagination. Conch also includes a implementations of the telnet and vt102 protocols, as well as support for rudamentary line editing behaviors. A new implementation of Twisted's Manhole application is also included, featuring server-side input history and interactive syntax coloring. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 17 10:13:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2006 05:13:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216103] New: Review Request: twisted-names - A Twisted DNS implementation Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216103 Summary: Review Request: twisted-names - A Twisted DNS implementation Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: thomas at apestaart.org QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://thomas.apestaart.org/download/pkg/fedora-5-x86_64-extras/python-twisted-names-0.3.0-2.fc5/python-twisted-names.spec SRPM URL: http://thomas.apestaart.org/download/pkg/fedora-5-x86_64-extras/python-twisted-names-0.3.0-2.fc5/python-twisted-names-0.3.0-2.fc5.src.rpm Description: Twisted is an event-based framework for internet applications. Twisted Names is both a domain name server as well as a client resolver library. Twisted Names comes with an "out of the box" nameserver which can read most BIND-syntax zone files as well as a simple Python-based configuration format. Twisted Names can act as an authoritative server, perform zone transfers from a master to act as a secondary, act as a caching nameserver, or any combination of these. Twisted Names' client resolver library provides functions to query for all commonly used record types as well as a replacement for the blocking gethostbyname() function provided by the Python stdlib socket module. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 17 10:15:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2006 05:15:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216104] New: Review Request: twisted-runner - process management library and inetd replacement Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216104 Summary: Review Request: twisted-runner - process management library and inetd replacement Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: thomas at apestaart.org QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://thomas.apestaart.org/download/pkg/fedora-5-x86_64-extras/python-twisted-runner-0.2.0-3.fc5/python-twisted-runner.spec SRPM URL: http://thomas.apestaart.org/download/pkg/fedora-5-x86_64-extras/python-twisted-runner-0.2.0-3.fc5/python-twisted-runner-0.2.0-3.fc5.src.rpm Description: Twisted is an event-based framework for internet applications. Twisted Runner contains code useful for persistent process management with Python and Twisted, and has an almost full replacement for inetd. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 17 10:16:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2006 05:16:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216105] New: Review Request: python-twisted-web - Twisted web server, programmable in Python Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216105 Summary: Review Request: python-twisted-web - Twisted web server, programmable in Python Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: thomas at apestaart.org QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://thomas.apestaart.org/download/pkg/fedora-5-x86_64-extras/python-twisted-web-0.6.0-3.fc5/python-twisted-web.spec SRPM URL: http://thomas.apestaart.org/download/pkg/fedora-5-x86_64-extras/python-twisted-web-0.6.0-3.fc5/python-twisted-web-0.6.0-3.fc5.src.rpm Description: Twisted is an event-based framework for internet applications. Twisted Web is a complete web server, aimed at hosting web applications using Twisted and Python, but fully able to serve static pages, also. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 17 10:17:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2006 05:17:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216106] New: Review Request: python-twisted-words - Twisted Words contains Instant Messaging implementations Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216106 Summary: Review Request: python-twisted-words - Twisted Words contains Instant Messaging implementations Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: thomas at apestaart.org QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://thomas.apestaart.org/download/pkg/fedora-5-x86_64-extras/python-twisted-words-0.4.0-2.fc5/python-twisted-words.spec SRPM URL: http://thomas.apestaart.org/download/pkg/fedora-5-x86_64-extras/python-twisted-words-0.4.0-2.fc5/python-twisted-words-0.4.0-2.fc5.src.rpm Description: Twisted is an event-based framework for internet applications. Twisted Words contains implementations of many Instant Messaging protocols, including IRC, Jabber, MSN, OSCAR (AIM & ICQ), TOC (AOL), and some functionality for creating bots, inter-protocol gateways, and a client application for many of the protocols. In support of Jabber, Twisted Words also contains X-ish, a library for processing XML with Twisted and Python, with support for a Pythonic DOM and an XPath-like toolkit. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 17 10:18:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2006 05:18:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216103] Review Request: python-twisted-names - A Twisted DNS implementation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611171018.kAHAIWUX007017@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-twisted-names - A Twisted DNS implementation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216103 thomas at apestaart.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: twisted- |Review Request: python- |names - A Twisted DNS |twisted-names - A Twisted |implementation |DNS implementation -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 17 10:19:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2006 05:19:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216104] Review Request: python-twisted-runner - process management library and inetd replacement In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611171019.kAHAJ7pA007072@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-twisted-runner - process management library and inetd replacement https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216104 thomas at apestaart.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: twisted- |Review Request: python- |runner - process management |twisted-runner - process |library and inetd |management library and inetd |replacement |replacement -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 17 10:20:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2006 05:20:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215165] Review Request: audacious-plugins - Plugins for the Audacious media player In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611171020.kAHAKNis007143@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: audacious-plugins - Plugins for the Audacious media player https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215165 matthias at rpmforge.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |matthias at rpmforge.net ------- Additional Comments From matthias at rpmforge.net 2006-11-17 05:20 EST ------- Yeah, this also seems correct to me : No need to "provide" the old names, as they shouldn't have been used other than explicitly (not from other package requirements). The obsoletes are required though, to provide a clean upgrade path, and are correct with the last known version. Please start the review ASAP or let me know if you'd like me to do it instead, as I'm quite impatient to have this audacious update available ;-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 17 10:47:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2006 05:47:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 208169] Review Request: python-twisted-core - An asynchronous networking framework written in Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611171047.kAHAleC3009454@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-twisted-core - An asynchronous networking framework written in Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208169 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-11-17 05:47 EST ------- I think we should review, import, and build all of the packages in a bottom-up dependency order. So the python-twisted metapackage would be the last one, and that is the only one that has been present in previous releases, so that's the only one that should cause an issue for anyone, so long as nobody builds any other package requiring one of the new python-twisted-* packages before the top-level metapackage is available. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 17 11:09:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2006 06:09:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215165] Review Request: audacious-plugins - Plugins for the Audacious media player In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611171109.kAHB9ups010620@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: audacious-plugins - Plugins for the Audacious media player https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215165 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-11-17 06:09 EST ------- Ok. Based on you comment i am going to review this package now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 17 11:41:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2006 06:41:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215165] Review Request: audacious-plugins - Plugins for the Audacious media player In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611171141.kAHBfHUq012053@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: audacious-plugins - Plugins for the Audacious media player https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215165 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-11-17 06:41 EST ------- (In reply to comment #7) > Yeah, this also seems correct to me : No need to "provide" the old names, as > they shouldn't have been used other than explicitly (not from other package > requirements). The obsoletes are required though, to provide a clean upgrade > path, and are correct with the last known version. > > Please start the review ASAP or let me know if you'd like me to do it instead, > as I'm quite impatient to have this audacious update available ;-) Thanks for testing this package. Based on above comment Review + package builds in mock (development i386)FC7. + rpmlint is silent for SRPM. + rpmlint on RPMs is not silent but as per above comments in bugzilla they can be ignored. + source files match upstream. 8ac7f73da7432e1ffed6c2b9b0fced8c audacious-plugins-fedora-1.2.2.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. License text included in package. + %doc is small; no -doc subpackage required. + %doc does not affect runtime. + COPYING included in %doc. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc files. + no -devel subpackage exists + available subpackages are audacious-plugins-jack,audacious-plugins-arts, audacious-plugins-esd,audacious-plugins-pulseaudio + as subpackages are packaging .so files post and postun called /sbin/ldconfig + Used update-desktop-database correctly + no .la files. + no translations available - Does NOT owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. SHOULD:- I saw that some directories are owned in audacious rpm whereas there is no need to own them by audacious but it should be owned by audacious-plugins. like /usr/lib/audacious /usr/lib/audacious/Container /usr/lib/audacious/Effect /usr/lib/audacious/General /usr/lib/audacious/Input /usr/lib/audacious/Output /usr/lib/audacious/Visualization Make it own by audacious-plugins -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 17 11:41:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2006 06:41:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 195645] Review Request: rasqal - RDF query library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611171141.kAHBfoqc012101@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rasqal - RDF query library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195645 ------- Additional Comments From thomas at apestaart.org 2006-11-17 06:41 EST ------- http://thomas.apestaart.org/download/pkg/fedora-5-x86_64-extras/rasqal-0.9.12-3.fc5/ updated -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 17 11:56:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2006 06:56:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215165] Review Request: audacious-plugins - Plugins for the Audacious media player In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611171156.kAHBuhf0012947@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: audacious-plugins - Plugins for the Audacious media player https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215165 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-11-17 06:56 EST ------- Matthias Saou, What do you think is above question is valid or should i approve package as it is? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 17 11:57:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2006 06:57:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 209260] Review Request: beryl-manager - Beryl window decorator and theme management utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611171157.kAHBvhgF013006@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: beryl-manager - Beryl window decorator and theme management utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209260 sertacyildiz at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |sertacyildiz at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From sertacyildiz at gmail.com 2006-11-17 06:57 EST ------- Are the names of these po/mo files correct? ar_AR, tr_TR, my_MY etc. They are creating new directories under /usr/share/locale that no package own. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 17 12:07:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2006 07:07:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215165] Review Request: audacious-plugins - Plugins for the Audacious media player In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611171207.kAHC7OkW013523@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: audacious-plugins - Plugins for the Audacious media player https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215165 ------- Additional Comments From redhat-bugzilla at camperquake.de 2006-11-17 07:07 EST ------- OK, one might argue that a-p should own /usr/lib/audacious, since audacious itself does not place any files there. If (and that's a big if) we/I should ever decide to split up a-p into a lot of tiny subpackages these directories would have to go back to audacious, since no subpackage could own all of these dirs. I personally do not care too much about it, but given the choice would leave things as they are (reduces work for me :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 17 12:25:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2006 07:25:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215165] Review Request: audacious-plugins - Plugins for the Audacious media player In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611171225.kAHCPEBv014593@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: audacious-plugins - Plugins for the Audacious media player https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215165 ------- Additional Comments From matthias at rpmforge.net 2006-11-17 07:25 EST ------- Since we have audacious requiring audacious-plugins, and audacious-plugins requiring audacious, I'm not quite sure what the proper solution would be. A while back, I would have made those dirs owned by both packages, in order to be 100% sure they get rmdir'ed upon removal of both packages (since we don't know which will be removed last in the same rpm transaction), but I'm not sure this is compatible with today's packaging guidelines. You might want to ask on the packaging list or go through the guidelines again ;-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 17 12:31:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2006 07:31:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215165] Review Request: audacious-plugins - Plugins for the Audacious media player In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611171231.kAHCVEMf015186@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: audacious-plugins - Plugins for the Audacious media player https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215165 ------- Additional Comments From redhat-bugzilla at camperquake.de 2006-11-17 07:31 EST ------- Erm, audacious Requires: audacious-plugins. audacious-plugins Requires: libaudacious.so.4 (provided by audacious-libs) audacious-plugins does not require audacious (circular deps, ugly). So there is nothing that prevents audacious from being removed while a-p is still installed as far as I can see. Ugly, that. Make audacious-libs own the plugin-dirs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 17 12:42:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2006 07:42:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214669] Review Request: logserial In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611171242.kAHCgRWo015864@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: logserial https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214669 wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 17 13:16:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2006 08:16:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215165] Review Request: audacious-plugins - Plugins for the Audacious media player In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611171316.kAHDGN2S018383@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: audacious-plugins - Plugins for the Audacious media player https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215165 ------- Additional Comments From matthias at rpmforge.net 2006-11-17 08:16 EST ------- I just looked again at audacious.spec : Requires: audacious-plugins >= 1.2.0 And at audacious-plugins.spec : Requires: audacious >= 1.2.0 But maybe those two spec files aren't the latest? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 17 13:19:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2006 08:19:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216129] New: Review Request: xerces-c - Validating XML Parser Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216129 Summary: Review Request: xerces-c - Validating XML Parser Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: gauret at free.fr QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://gauret.free.fr/fichiers/rpms/fedora/xerces-c.spec SRPM URL: http://gauret.free.fr/fichiers/rpms/fedora/xerces-c-2.7.0-1.src.rpm Description: Xerces-C is a validating XML parser written in a portable subset of C++. Xerces-C makes it easy to give your application the ability to read and write XML data. A shared library is provided for parsing, generating, manipulating, and validating XML documents. Xerces-C is faithful to the XML 1.0 recommendation and associated standards ( DOM 1.0, DOM 2.0. SAX 1.0, SAX 2.0, Namespaces). This package has been imported from Dag's repo and slightly tweaked. Thanks to Dag for his work. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 17 13:22:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2006 08:22:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216130] New: Review Request: glest - 3D real time strategy game Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216130 Summary: Review Request: glest - 3D real time strategy game Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: gauret at free.fr QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://gauret.free.fr/fichiers/rpms/fedora/glest.spec SRPM URL: http://gauret.free.fr/fichiers/rpms/fedora/glest-2.0.0-1.src.rpm Description: Glest is a free 3D real time strategy game, that can be modified using XML and a set of tools Project's website : http://www.glest.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 17 13:25:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2006 08:25:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216131] New: Review Request: glest-data - Data files for the game Glest Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216131 Summary: Review Request: glest-data - Data files for the game Glest Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: gauret at free.fr QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://gauret.free.fr/fichiers/rpms/fedora/glest-data.spec SRPM URL: http://gauret.free.fr/fichiers/rpms/fedora/glest-data-2.0.0-1.src.rpm Description: Glest is a free 3D real time strategy game, that can be modified using XML and a set of tools This package contains the data files for the game See bug 216130 for the game engine. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 17 13:26:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2006 08:26:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216130] Review Request: glest - 3D real time strategy game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611171326.kAHDQDao018874@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glest - 3D real time strategy game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216130 gauret at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |216129, 216131 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 17 13:26:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2006 08:26:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216129] Review Request: xerces-c - Validating XML Parser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611171326.kAHDQOYV018918@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xerces-c - Validating XML Parser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216129 gauret at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |216130 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 17 13:26:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2006 08:26:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216131] Review Request: glest-data - Data files for the game Glest In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611171326.kAHDQjAG018972@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glest-data - Data files for the game Glest https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216131 gauret at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |216130 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 17 14:05:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2006 09:05:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215165] Review Request: audacious-plugins - Plugins for the Audacious media player In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611171405.kAHE5RHb022589@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: audacious-plugins - Plugins for the Audacious media player https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215165 ------- Additional Comments From redhat-bugzilla at camperquake.de 2006-11-17 09:05 EST ------- You're right, I forgot that (splitting off audacious-libs solved the build time deps, however). But even the explicit dependency does not guarantee removal in the right order, or does it? Any bright ideas on that? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 17 14:11:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2006 09:11:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214730] Review Request: pungi - Distribution compose tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611171411.kAHEBLl3023209@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pungi - Distribution compose tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214730 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-11-17 09:11 EST ------- Shouldn't this bug be closed now? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 17 14:21:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2006 09:21:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214830] Review Request: Limph - PHP network host monitor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611171421.kAHELwKR024091@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Limph - PHP network host monitor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214830 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2006-11-17 09:21 EST ------- Spec URL: http://gryffindor.jcomserv.net/extras/limph/limph-2.spec SRPM URL: http://gryffindor.jcomserv.net/extras/limph/limph-1.9.3-2.src.rpm I addressed the source BuildArch, URL, RPM_SOURCE_DIR, limph.conf issues. I'm trying to solve the conf file issues with symlinks and it's not working, nor is my %attr for the tmp directory applying the desired ownership. What am I doing wrong? The reason the MD5 doesn't match upstream is the folder name in the source tarball is limph, not limph-1.9.3, so I untarred, renamed and retarred to get it to build. Should I re-release a 1.9.3.1 with this fixed, or is there a way around it in the SPEC? Thanks for the help, BTW. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 17 14:28:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2006 09:28:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216129] Review Request: xerces-c - Validating XML Parser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611171428.kAHESLV1024432@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xerces-c - Validating XML Parser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216129 rc040203 at freenet.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2006-11-17 09:28 EST ------- This review request is a duplicate of https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210553 Aurelien, I'd suggest you to review PR 210553 and/or to cooperate with Peter on his submission. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 210553 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 17 14:28:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2006 09:28:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 210553] Review Request: xerces-c - Validating XML Parser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611171428.kAHESMpJ024440@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xerces-c - Validating XML Parser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210553 rc040203 at freenet.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |gauret at free.fr ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2006-11-17 09:28 EST ------- *** Bug 216129 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 17 14:28:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2006 09:28:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214730] Review Request: pungi - Distribution compose tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611171428.kAHESaJf024530@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pungi - Distribution compose tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214730 jkeating at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-11-17 09:28 EST ------- Whoops, I was waiting for the push, that happened. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 17 14:28:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2006 09:28:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216130] Review Request: glest - 3D real time strategy game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611171428.kAHESuec024593@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glest - 3D real time strategy game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216130 Bug 216130 depends on bug 216129, which changed state. Bug 216129 Summary: Review Request: xerces-c - Validating XML Parser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216129 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |DUPLICATE Status|NEW |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 17 14:52:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2006 09:52:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215568] Review Request: beryl-dbus - Beryl OpenGL window and compositing manager dbus plug-in In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611171452.kAHEqGi5026822@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: beryl-dbus - Beryl OpenGL window and compositing manager dbus plug-in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215568 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-11-17 09:52 EST ------- Okay. ----------------------------------------------- This package (beryl-dbus) is APPROVED by me. ----------------------------------------------- Two comments. 1. Requires: dbus This is not necessary because this package (beryl-dbus) requires libdbus-1.so.3 and this adds dbus dependency automatically. 2. For beryl-core package: /usr/lib/libberylsettings.so.0.0.0 contains lots of undefined non-weak symbols (as said above). [tasaka1 at localhost ~]$ ldd -r /usr/lib/libberylsettings.so.0.0.0 undefined symbol: g_free (/usr/lib/libberylsettings.so.0.0.0) undefined symbol: g_free (/usr/lib/libberylsettings.so.0.0.0) undefined symbol: g_slist_remove (/usr/lib/libberylsettings.so.0.0.0) undefined symbol: g_mkdir_with_parents (/usr/lib/libberylsettings.so.0.0.0) undefined symbol: g_key_file_has_key (/usr/lib/libberylsettings.so.0.0.0) undefined symbol: g_key_file_get_string_list (/usr/lib/libberylsettings.so.0.0.0) undefined symbol: g_dir_close (/usr/lib/libberylsettings.so.0.0.0) undefined symbol: XStringToKeysym (/usr/lib/libberylsettings.so.0.0.0) ....... ....... Please fix the linkage against this library. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 17 15:02:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2006 10:02:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 208169] Review Request: python-twisted-core - An asynchronous networking framework written in Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611171502.kAHF2p2k027713@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-twisted-core - An asynchronous networking framework written in Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208169 ------- Additional Comments From jeff at ocjtech.us 2006-11-17 10:02 EST ------- Not having python-twisted-core pushed out (at least to devel) will make testing builds with mock harder, as you'll have to set up a local repo with python-twisted-core in it and configure mock to look at it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 17 15:36:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2006 10:36:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215571] Review Request: heliodor - Beryl window decorator with Metacity theme support In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611171536.kAHFaQWv029739@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: heliodor - Beryl window decorator with Metacity theme support https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215571 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 17 16:43:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2006 11:43:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215792] Review Request: wgrib - Manipulate, inventory and decode GRIB files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611171643.kAHGhCdQ003935@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wgrib - Manipulate, inventory and decode GRIB files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215792 ------- Additional Comments From orion at cora.nwra.com 2006-11-17 11:43 EST ------- Emailed Wesley. 1.8.0.12g has just been made "production", so I've upped the version. He still wants the .c file to be the official release, but has started versioning them on the ftp site. I've asked again for versioned .tar files so we can get the Changes file with them, but I really don't see it as a blocker at this point. http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/wgrib-1.8.0.12g-1.fc6.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 17 16:48:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2006 11:48:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 210553] Review Request: xerces-c - Validating XML Parser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611171648.kAHGm6nn004425@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xerces-c - Validating XML Parser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210553 ------- Additional Comments From gauret at free.fr 2006-11-17 11:48 EST ------- Needs work: * Use of buildroot is not consistant (wiki: PackagingGuidelines#UsingBuildRootOptFlags) * Missing SMP flags. If it doesn't build with it, please add a comment (wiki: PackagingGuidelines#parallelmake) * rpmlint: - strange-permission xerces-c.spec 0666 (in the src.rpm) - hidden dir : /usr/share/doc/xerces-c-doc-2.7.0/doc/html/resources/.svn (please clean it up in %%prep) For what it's worth, I'd just move the samples to the doc package -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 17 16:56:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2006 11:56:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214024] Review Request: perl-Net-DBus - Net::DBus Perl module In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611171656.kAHGuWhe004938@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-DBus - Net::DBus Perl module https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214024 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-11-17 11:56 EST ------- Ok, I found a FC5 box and build it there... with the additional BR's, no problem. I also built it under mock for fc5&6 (i386)... All tests passed cleanly, so I'm not quite sure what happened above. SRPM URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-Net-DBus-0.33.4-2.fc6.src.rpm SPEC URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-Net-DBus.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 17 16:57:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2006 11:57:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215569] Review Request: beryl-vidcap - Beryl OpenGL window and compositing manager video capture utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611171657.kAHGv00b004968@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: beryl-vidcap - Beryl OpenGL window and compositing manager video capture utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215569 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-11-17 11:56 EST ------- Well, during review on beryl-vipcap, several issues are found. * %{_libdir}/beryl/libcapture.so contains undefined non-weak symbols. ---------------------------------------------------- [tasaka1 at localhost ~]$ ldd -r /usr/lib/beryl/libcapture.so > /dev/null undefined symbol: glEnd (/usr/lib/beryl/libcapture.so) undefined symbol: glEnable (/usr/lib/beryl/libcapture.so) undefined symbol: glColor4us (/usr/lib/beryl/libcapture.so) undefined symbol: glEnableClientState (/usr/lib/beryl/libcapture.so) undefined symbol: glDisable (/usr/lib/beryl/libcapture.so) undefined symbol: glRecti (/usr/lib/beryl/libcapture.so) undefined symbol: addScreenAction (/usr/lib/beryl/libcapture.so) undefined symbol: compSetFloatOption (/usr/lib/beryl/libcapture.so) undefined symbol: getIntOptionNamed (/usr/lib/beryl/libcapture.so) (and others) ---------------------------------------------------- Please check the linkage against this package. * Related to above, -devel package are missing necessary Requires. %{_includedir}/seom/seom.h reads: ---------------------------------------------------- #include #include #include #include #include #include ---------------------------------------------------- This means -devel package requires at least the following packages --------------------------------------------------- libGL-devel (this is provided by mesa-libGL-devel) libX11-devel xorg-x11-proto-devel (this is required by mesa-libGL-devel so redundant for writing to Requires) --------------------------------------------------- and also this implies that the missing linkage on %{_libdir}/beryl/libcapture.so _may_ be for libGL.so and libX11.so (I have not checked). * Fedora specific compilation flags are not passed. ---------------------------------------------------- + umask 022 + cd /builddir/build/BUILD + cd beryl-vidcap-0.1.2 + LANG=C + export LANG + unset DISPLAY + rm -rf /var/tmp/beryl-vidcap-0.1.2-6.fc7-root-mockbuild + pushd seom ~/build/BUILD/beryl-vidcap-0.1.2/seom ~/build/BUILD/beryl-vidcap-0.1.2 + make DESTDIR=/var/tmp/beryl-vidcap-0.1.2-6.fc7-root-mockbuild install cc -W -Wall -std=c99 -Iinclude -ldl -lpthread -L.libs -lseom -o seom-filter src/filter/main.c cc -W -Wall -std=c99 -Iinclude -ldl -lpthread -L.libs -lseom -lX11 -lXv -o seom-player src/player/main.c cc -W -Wall -std=c99 -Iinclude -ldl -lpthread -L.libs -lseom -o seom-server src/server/main.c ------------------------------------------------------ (This uses original 0.1.2-6 spec file). Please fix this. * License: I cannot find any GPL license document file in the source files. Only I can read is in capture.c, however, it is not GPL (looks like "free" license, however, what is this?) Well, other files than capture.c don't contain any license terms and no license document is provided, so, the license of this package is really questionable....... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 17 17:21:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2006 12:21:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214024] Review Request: perl-Net-DBus - Net::DBus Perl module In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611171721.kAHHLHB8007803@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-DBus - Net::DBus Perl module https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214024 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-11-17 12:21 EST ------- The point was that it fails to build in rawhide. I tested it on FC5 and it was fine; I was unable to test on FC6 but I am not surprised to see that it works. Failure to work on rawhide is certainly not a blocker, but you should know up front that the code is buggy and could fail at pretty much any time if Red Hat see a need to update DBUS in FC6. I'll check out the new packages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 17 17:32:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2006 12:32:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214024] Review Request: perl-Net-DBus - Net::DBus Perl module In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611171732.kAHHWs8m009328@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-DBus - Net::DBus Perl module https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214024 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-11-17 12:32 EST ------- Ahh, rawhide. I missed that, somehow. The module appears to be actively maintained, and the author has been fairly responsive when I've filed issues against it. I'm not worried about there being dbus support in this module to match rawhile by the time fc7 rolls around. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 17 17:45:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2006 12:45:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215563] Review Request: aquamarine - Themeable window decorator and compositing manager for Beryl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611171745.kAHHjgjY010884@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aquamarine - Themeable window decorator and compositing manager for Beryl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215563 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-11-17 12:45 EST ------- mock build suceeds on FC-devel i386. * BuildRequires: qt, kdelibs This is not needed to be written as libraries' dependency on this package automatically requires them (libqt-mt.so.3 and libkdecore.so.4) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 17 18:08:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2006 13:08:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 189188] Review Request: sqlgrey - postfix grey-listing policy service In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611171808.kAHI8qbO013167@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sqlgrey - postfix grey-listing policy service https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189188 ------- Additional Comments From steve at silug.org 2006-11-17 13:08 EST ------- I figured out my issue. As-is, the package doesn't depend on any DBD modules, but it defaults to using DBD::Pg: Nov 17 12:01:32 localhost sqlgrey: fatal: Can't locate DBD/Pg.pm in @INC (@INC contains: /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.8/i386-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.7/i386-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.6/i386-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.5/i386-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.8 /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.7 /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.6 /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.5 /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/i386-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.7/i386-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.6/i386-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.5/i386-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8 /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.7 /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.6 /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.5 /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl /usr/lib/perl5/5.8.8/i386-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib/perl5/5.8.8 .) at (eval 9) line 3. Nov 17 12:01:33 localhost sqlgrey: fatal: install_driver(Pg) failed: Can't locate DBD/Pg.pm in @INC (@INC contains: /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.8/i386-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.7/i386-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.6/i386-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.5/i386-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.8 /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.7 /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.6 /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.5 /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/i386-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.7/i386-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.6/i386-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.5/i386-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8 /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.7 /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.6 /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.5 /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl /usr/lib/perl5/5.8.8/i386-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib/perl5/5.8.8 .) at (eval 9) line 3. Perhaps the DBD::Pg perl module hasn't been fully installed, or per If there are no objections, I'll change the packaged config file to use SQLite (and require DBD::SQLite). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 17 18:13:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2006 13:13:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215568] Review Request: beryl-dbus - Beryl OpenGL window and compositing manager dbus plug-in In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611171813.kAHIDGAi013558@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: beryl-dbus - Beryl OpenGL window and compositing manager dbus plug-in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215568 ------- Additional Comments From jwilson at redhat.com 2006-11-17 13:13 EST ------- (In reply to comment #7) > Okay. > ----------------------------------------------- > This package (beryl-dbus) is APPROVED by me. > ----------------------------------------------- > > Two comments. > 1. Requires: dbus > This is not necessary because this package (beryl-dbus) requires > libdbus-1.so.3 and this adds dbus dependency automatically. Done for the version I'll import once cvs is resurrected. Thank you! > 2. For beryl-core package: > /usr/lib/libberylsettings.so.0.0.0 contains lots of undefined non-weak > symbols (as said above). [...] > ....... > Please fix the linkage against this library. Looking into it now... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 17 18:40:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2006 13:40:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 212917] Review Request: php-pear-DB-DataObject - An SQL Builder, Object Interface to Database Tables In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611171840.kAHIeKZX015994@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-DB-DataObject - An SQL Builder, Object Interface to Database Tables Alias: DB-DataObject https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212917 ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2006-11-17 13:40 EST ------- I have moved the createTables script to %{_bindir} and created a link to its old location because the documentation says to find it there. The version number was a copy&paste error on my part from the FormBuilder package. SPEC: http://tkmame.retrogames.com/fedora-extras/php-pear-DB-DataObject.spec SRPM: http://tkmame.retrogames.com/fedora-extras/php-pear-DB-DataObject-1.8.4-2.src.rpm %changelog * Fri Nov 17 2006 Christohper Stone 1.8.4-2 - Fix version number in %%changelog - Add versioned Requires - Move createTables script to %%{_bindir} -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 17 18:52:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2006 13:52:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215563] Review Request: aquamarine - Themeable window decorator and compositing manager for Beryl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611171852.kAHIqavY016933@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aquamarine - Themeable window decorator and compositing manager for Beryl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215563 ------- Additional Comments From jwilson at redhat.com 2006-11-17 13:52 EST ------- New build, removes Requires: on qt and kdelibs, relies on auto-gen'd lib deps. http://wilsonet.com/packages/beryl/aquamarine-0.1.2-3.fc6.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 17 19:37:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2006 14:37:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215571] Review Request: heliodor - Beryl window decorator with Metacity theme support In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611171937.kAHJbdVO021547@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: heliodor - Beryl window decorator with Metacity theme support https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215571 ------- Additional Comments From jwilson at redhat.com 2006-11-17 14:37 EST ------- Okay, this is due to changes in metacity 2.17 in rawhide. The *_corner_rounded bits were renamed to *_corner_rounded_radius. Easy enough to patch around. New version builds in devel/x86_64 mock and on FC6/x86_64 for me: http://wilsonet.com/packages/beryl/heliodor-0.1.2-3.fc6.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 17 20:37:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2006 15:37:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 189188] Review Request: sqlgrey - postfix grey-listing policy service In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611172037.kAHKbnmx027062@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sqlgrey - postfix grey-listing policy service https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189188 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-11-17 15:37 EST ------- That sounds like an excellent plan to me. Let me know when you have the new versions up and ready and I can do a final checkover before approval. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 17 20:57:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2006 15:57:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215792] Review Request: wgrib - Manipulate, inventory and decode GRIB files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611172057.kAHKvSMN028367@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wgrib - Manipulate, inventory and decode GRIB files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215792 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-11-17 15:57 EST ------- The version issue being sorted out, rpmlint is silent now, APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 17 21:31:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2006 16:31:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215569] Review Request: beryl-vidcap - Beryl OpenGL window and compositing manager video capture utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611172131.kAHLVE0p030251@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: beryl-vidcap - Beryl OpenGL window and compositing manager video capture utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215569 ------- Additional Comments From jwilson at redhat.com 2006-11-17 16:31 EST ------- I like the rpath-killer there, very crafty, nice to not have to resort to chrpath. I've put that in my local spec for the next build. I've also fully fixed the cflags and -devel dependencies. As for the undefined symbols... The gl* ones are indeed resolved by linking against libGL, but I'm not having any luck figuring out exactly what to do for the others. I did find that essentially the same unresolved symbols show up for all beryl and compiz plugins though... Probably going to have to poke both upstreams about this one... On the license front... I see a #define _GNU_SOURCE, but yeah, the license block is a little vague. I'll prod upstream for clarification. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 17 21:52:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2006 16:52:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215563] Review Request: aquamarine - Themeable window decorator and compositing manager for Beryl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611172152.kAHLqMeJ031831@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aquamarine - Themeable window decorator and compositing manager for Beryl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215563 mr.ecik at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mr.ecik at gmail.com 2006-11-17 16:52 EST ------- Approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 18 02:02:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2006 21:02:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 212917] Review Request: php-pear-DB-DataObject - An SQL Builder, Object Interface to Database Tables In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611180202.kAI22YUK009084@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-DB-DataObject - An SQL Builder, Object Interface to Database Tables Alias: DB-DataObject https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212917 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-11-17 21:02 EST ------- Looks good to me; rpmlint is quiet now. I'm not really sure about the symlink (I'd rather just ignore or patch the documentation) but I don't think it hurts anything. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 18 05:45:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Nov 2006 00:45:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214024] Review Request: perl-Net-DBus - Net::DBus Perl module In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611180545.kAI5j052018174@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-DBus - Net::DBus Perl module https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214024 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-11-18 00:44 EST ------- I spent a bit of time to get FC6 builds working, and builds on FC6 as well as FC5 are fine: All tests successful, 48 subtests skipped. Files=17, Tests=710, 5 wallclock secs ( 2.44 cusr + 0.44 csys = 2.88 CPU) So, rawhide builds are broken (due to problems with the packaged software, not with rawhide), but that's not a blocker. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 18 07:28:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Nov 2006 02:28:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214236] Review Request: php-pear-SOAP - Simple Object Access Protocol (SOAP) Client/Server for PHP In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611180728.kAI7SQ1S020419@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-SOAP - Simple Object Access Protocol (SOAP) Client/Server for PHP Alias: php-pear-SOAP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214236 Fedora at FamilleCollet.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 18 07:28:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Nov 2006 02:28:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215200] Review Request: php-pear-Services-Weather - This class acts as an interface to various online weather-services In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611180728.kAI7Smkh020450@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Services-Weather - This class acts as an interface to various online weather-services Alias: pear-Svcs-Weather https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215200 Bug 215200 depends on bug 214236, which changed state. Bug 214236 Summary: Review Request: php-pear-SOAP - Simple Object Access Protocol (SOAP) Client/Server for PHP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214236 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 18 09:55:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Nov 2006 04:55:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 210553] Review Request: xerces-c - Validating XML Parser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611180955.kAI9tBjW027828@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xerces-c - Validating XML Parser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210553 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2006-11-18 04:55 EST ------- Note that if the built samples are shipped, they're arch dependent executables and thus should not be installed in /usr/share no matter which package they're in. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 18 09:56:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Nov 2006 04:56:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216129] Review Request: xerces-c - Validating XML Parser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611180956.kAI9u19w027892@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xerces-c - Validating XML Parser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216129 ville.skytta at iki.fi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 18 09:58:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Nov 2006 04:58:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 210553] Review Request: xerces-c - Validating XML Parser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611180958.kAI9weNt028018@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xerces-c - Validating XML Parser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210553 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2006-11-18 04:58 EST ------- Build fails on x86_64 due to hardcoded /usr/lib paths somewhere: RPM build errors: File not found by glob: /var/tmp/xerces-c-2.7.0-2.cmn6-root-machbuild/usr/lib64/libxerces*.so.* File not found by glob: /var/tmp/xerces-c-2.7.0-2.cmn6-root-machbuild/usr/lib64/libxerces*.so -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 18 13:51:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Nov 2006 08:51:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215193] Review Request: VLGothic-fonts - Truetype Japanese gothic fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611181351.kAIDpTnd006785@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: VLGothic-fonts - Truetype Japanese gothic fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215193 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-11-18 08:51 EST ------- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 18 13:52:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Nov 2006 08:52:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 211336] Review Request: adesklets - A simple architecture for desktop applets In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611181352.kAIDqFur006851@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: adesklets - A simple architecture for desktop applets Alias: adeskets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211336 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-11-18 08:52 EST ------- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 18 14:28:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Nov 2006 09:28:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215571] Review Request: heliodor - Beryl window decorator with Metacity theme support In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611181428.kAIESkwL008939@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: heliodor - Beryl window decorator with Metacity theme support https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215571 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-11-18 09:28 EST ------- Well, this time mockbuild for FC-devel i386 is okay. * Requires: metacity, control-center - Not necessary as libraries' dependency automaticall pulls them. ? /usr/share/gnome/wm-properties/ - This directory is not owned by any package, however, I don't know which package should own this. (This package requires metacity, so my thought is that this should be metacity, however, do you have any idea?) Currently, my system has the following files under /usr/share/gnome/wm-properties/: ------------------------------------------ beryl.desktop (by heliodor-0.1.2-3.fc7) compiz.desktop (by compiz-0.3.2-2.fc7) metacity.desktop (by metacity-2.17.2-1.fc7) ------------------------------------------ ? For license: - lib/beryl-window-manager.c seems to be "free" (not GPL however less strict than GPL) - src/main.c says this is LGPL (not GPL) (why?) - and there is a copy license that this is GPL..... Well, however, I trust the document license and I assume that this package is licensed under GPL for now. Other things are okay. ------------------------------------------------------- This packag (beliodor) is APPROVED by me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 18 14:32:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Nov 2006 09:32:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215564] Review Request: bdock - Beryl project's replacement windowmaker dock In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611181432.kAIEWrDC009044@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bdock - Beryl project's replacement windowmaker dock https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215564 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 18 15:00:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Nov 2006 10:00:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215564] Review Request: bdock - Beryl project's replacement windowmaker dock In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611181500.kAIF0dKe009704@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bdock - Beryl project's replacement windowmaker dock https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215564 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-11-18 10:00 EST ------- Well, one question: * /usr/share/pixmaps/clip.tiff /usr/share/pixmaps/defaultAppIcon.xpm /usr/share/pixmaps/tile.tiff - I don't know well about this package, however, source codes include: --------------------------------------------------- ./src/Makefile.am:INCLUDES=@BDOCK_CFLAGS@ -DPIXMAPDIR='"$(datadir)/bdock/"' ./src/main.c: bdock_tile_set_bg_from_file(bt,PIXMAPDIR "tile.tiff"); ./src/main.c: gdk_pixbuf_new_from_file(PIXMAPDIR "defaultAppIcon.xpm",NULL); (and etc) --------------------------------------------------- However, all the image files are installed under /usr/share/pixmaps. Is this correct? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 18 15:19:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Nov 2006 10:19:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215193] Review Request: VLGothic-fonts - Truetype Japanese gothic fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611181519.kAIFJNvJ010116@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: VLGothic-fonts - Truetype Japanese gothic fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215193 ------- Additional Comments From ryo-dairiki at users.sourceforge.net 2006-11-18 10:19 EST ------- Pong. :) I've just modified them. You can get the newer version here: Spec URL: http://homepage2.nifty.com/shibatama/garage/VLGothic-fonts.spec SRPM URL: http://homepage2.nifty.com/shibatama/garage/VLGothic-fonts-20061026-3.noarch.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 18 15:35:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Nov 2006 10:35:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 212916] Review Request: php-pear-DB-DataObject-FormBuilder - Automatically build HTML_QuickForm objects In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611181535.kAIFZjSn010450@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-DB-DataObject-FormBuilder - Automatically build HTML_QuickForm objects Alias: DataObj-FormBuilder https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212916 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 18 15:42:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Nov 2006 10:42:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215193] Review Request: VLGothic-fonts - Truetype Japanese gothic fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611181542.kAIFgWe1010726@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: VLGothic-fonts - Truetype Japanese gothic fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215193 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-11-18 10:42 EST ------- Okay. -------------------------------------------------- This package (VLGothic-fonts) is APPROVED by me. -------------------------------------------------- Please use the 'RPM Copy Requests' of http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/RepoRequests to copy the srpm and noarch rpm from devel branch to other branches (and also use: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/CVSSyncNeeded ). NOTE: currently Fedora Extras CVS system is down. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 18 17:15:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Nov 2006 12:15:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215200] Review Request: php-pear-Services-Weather - This class acts as an interface to various online weather-services In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611181715.kAIHFbUu013588@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Services-Weather - This class acts as an interface to various online weather-services Alias: pear-Svcs-Weather https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215200 ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2006-11-18 12:15 EST ------- Hi Remi, quick comment before I start the formal review. I looked over your spec file and I wonder why you choose to use # as your delimiter character in your sed command? # is used as a comment in a spec file and this looks very confusing to a reader of the spec file, please change # to @ instead. Also you use %{__sed} however you do not use macros for any other of your system commands, you should be consistent and just use "sed", I think it came up during the discussion of creating the template that macro usage for system commands was only needed in %post(pre)/%post(pre)un sections. Therefore, I would change the sed line to read: sed -i -e s@/usr/local/bin/php@%{_bindir}/php@ $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{pear_datadir}/%{pear_name}/buildMetarDB.php -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 18 17:29:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Nov 2006 12:29:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216131] Review Request: glest-data - Data files for the game Glest In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611181729.kAIHTUJm014579@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glest-data - Data files for the game Glest https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216131 ------- Additional Comments From lemenkov at gmail.com 2006-11-18 12:29 EST ------- Maybe it would be better to use only one spec-file which produces two packages - glest and glest-data? ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 18 17:32:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Nov 2006 12:32:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216130] Review Request: glest - 3D real time strategy game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611181732.kAIHWjhH014796@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glest - 3D real time strategy game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216130 lemenkov at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |210553 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 18 17:32:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Nov 2006 12:32:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 210553] Review Request: xerces-c - Validating XML Parser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611181732.kAIHWuBR014820@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xerces-c - Validating XML Parser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210553 lemenkov at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |216130 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 18 17:39:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Nov 2006 12:39:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215200] Review Request: php-pear-Services-Weather - This class acts as an interface to various online weather-services In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611181739.kAIHdqXq015507@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Services-Weather - This class acts as an interface to various online weather-services Alias: pear-Svcs-Weather https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215200 ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2006-11-18 12:39 EST ------- ==== REVIEW CHECKLIST ==== - rpmlint output clean - package named according to package naming guidelines - spec filename matches %{name} - package meets packaging guidelines - package licensed with open source compatible license - license matches actual license - spec written in American english X spec file is not legible, see comment #1 above. - sed command obfuscated by using comment character (#) as delimeter - source match upstream a83fbf5e2e7ffd22219c513cfefe6b52 Services_Weather-1.4.0.tgz - successfully compiles and builds on FC6 x86_64 - all build dependencies listed in BR - no locales - no shared libraries - not relocatable - owns all directories it creates - no duplicates in %files - file permissions set properly - contains proper %clean section - macro usage consistent - although you use %{__sed} when you dont use macros for any other system command - contains code - no large documentation - files in %doc do not affect run time - no header files or static libraries - no pkgconfig files - no devel subpackage required - no .la files - not a GUI app needing a .desktop file - does not own files or directories owned by other packages ==== MUST ==== - Unobfuscate sed command by using @ instead of # as delimiter (# is used as a comment character in spec files) ==== SHOULD ==== - Change %{__sed} to just "sed" to have consistent macro usage, macros for system commands are only needed for %post/%pre,%postun/%preun sections -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 18 18:54:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Nov 2006 13:54:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215200] Review Request: php-pear-Services-Weather - This class acts as an interface to various online weather-services In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611181854.kAIIs6DA019643@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Services-Weather - This class acts as an interface to various online weather-services Alias: pear-Svcs-Weather https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215200 ------- Additional Comments From Fedora at FamilleCollet.com 2006-11-18 13:54 EST ------- Hi, thanks for the review. Spec URL: http://remi.collet.free.fr/rpms/extras/php-pear-Services-Weather.spec SRPM URL: http://remi.collet.free.fr/rpms/extras/php-pear-Services-Weather-1.4.0-2.fc7.src.rp %changelog * Sat Nov 18 2006 Remi Collet 1.4.0-2 - Unobfuscate sed command -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 18 18:55:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Nov 2006 13:55:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215200] Review Request: php-pear-Services-Weather - This class acts as an interface to various online weather-services In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611181855.kAIIt8Cr019689@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Services-Weather - This class acts as an interface to various online weather-services Alias: pear-Svcs-Weather https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215200 ------- Additional Comments From Fedora at FamilleCollet.com 2006-11-18 13:55 EST ------- SRPM URL: http://remi.collet.free.fr/rpms/extras/php-pear-Services-Weather-1.4.0-2.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 18 19:00:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Nov 2006 14:00:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216282] New: Review Request: mirage - A fast and simple image viewer Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216282 Summary: Review Request: mirage - A fast and simple image viewer Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~mtasaka/dist/extras/development/SPECS/mirage.spec SRPM URL: http://www.ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~mtasaka/dist/extras/development/SRPMS/mirage-0.8.1-1.src.rpm Description: Mirage is a fast and simple GTK+ image viewer. Because it depends only on PyGTK, Mirage is ideal for users who wish to keep their computers lean while still having a clean image viewer. ----------------------------------------------- NOTE: The original review request is bug 196570 , which is stalled. However, I could not download the original spec file from the bug so I rewrote the spec file fully by myself. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 18 19:03:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Nov 2006 14:03:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 196570] Review Request: mirage In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611181903.kAIJ38g2019905@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mirage https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196570 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|NOTABUG |DUPLICATE CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-11-18 14:02 EST ------- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 216282 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 18 19:03:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Nov 2006 14:03:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216282] Review Request: mirage - A fast and simple image viewer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611181903.kAIJ3KeW019926@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mirage - A fast and simple image viewer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216282 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |michael at knox.net.nz ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-11-18 14:03 EST ------- *** Bug 196570 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 18 19:16:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Nov 2006 14:16:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216284] New: Review Request: dd2 - Dodgin' Diamond 2 - Shoot'em up arcade game Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216284 Summary: Review Request: dd2 - Dodgin' Diamond 2 - Shoot'em up arcade game Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/dd2.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/dd2-0.2.1-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: This is a little shoot'em up arcade game for one or two players. It aims to be an 'old school' arcade game with low resolution graphics, top-down scroll action, energy based gameplay and different weapons with several levels of power. --- The rpmlint error is because the game is sgid games in order to allow global highscore saving, it has been patched todo this in a secure way. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 18 19:17:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Nov 2006 14:17:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216285] New: Review Request: kleansweep - Reclaim disk space by finding unneeded files Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216285 Summary: Review Request: kleansweep - Reclaim disk space by finding unneeded files Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cgoorah at yahoo.com.au QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://chitlesh.googlepages.com/kleansweep.spec SRPM URL: http://chitlesh.googlepages.com/kleansweep-0.2.9-1.src.rpm Description: KleanSweep allows you to reclaim disk space by finding unneeded files. It can search for files based on several criteria: you can seek for empty files, backup files, broken symbolic links, dead menu entries, duplicated files, orphaned files (files not found in the RPM database), and more. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 18 20:18:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Nov 2006 15:18:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215200] Review Request: php-pear-Services-Weather - This class acts as an interface to various online weather-services In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611182018.kAIKItOh022614@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Services-Weather - This class acts as an interface to various online weather-services Alias: pear-Svcs-Weather https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215200 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2006-11-18 15:18 EST ------- Looks good, APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 18 20:28:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Nov 2006 15:28:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 210553] Review Request: xerces-c - Validating XML Parser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611182028.kAIKS4me022887@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xerces-c - Validating XML Parser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210553 ------- Additional Comments From lemenkov at gmail.com 2006-11-18 15:28 EST ------- (In reply to comment #9) > Needs work: > * Use of buildroot is not consistant > (wiki: PackagingGuidelines#UsingBuildRootOptFlags) Done. > * Missing SMP flags. If it doesn't build with it, please add a comment > (wiki: PackagingGuidelines#parallelmake) Done. > * rpmlint: > - strange-permission xerces-c.spec 0666 (in the src.rpm) Done. > - hidden dir : /usr/share/doc/xerces-c-doc-2.7.0/doc/html/resources/.svn > (please clean it up in %%prep) Done. > For what it's worth, I'd just move the samples to the doc package http://lemenkov.newmail.ru/SPECS/xerces-c.spec http://lemenkov.newmail.ru/SRPMS/xerces-c-2.7.0-3.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 18 20:40:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Nov 2006 15:40:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 200700] Review Request: clipsmm - A C++ interface to the CLIPS library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611182040.kAIKeLtJ023242@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clipsmm - A C++ interface to the CLIPS library Alias: clipsmm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200700 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-11-18 15:40 EST ------- ok. That one matches up on md5sum and I don't see any further blockers, so this package is APPROVED. Don't forget to close this NEXTRELEASE once it's been imported and built. (Note that cvs is down currently however). Also consider doing a review of another waiting package to help spread out the reviewing load. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 18 20:52:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Nov 2006 15:52:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216130] Review Request: glest - 3D real time strategy game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611182052.kAIKqgwk023781@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glest - 3D real time strategy game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216130 wayward4now at yahoo.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |wayward4now at yahoo.com ------- Additional Comments From wayward4now at yahoo.com 2006-11-18 15:52 EST ------- Needs these depends to build: jam is needed by glest-2.0.0-1.i386 openal-devel is needed by glest-2.0.0-1.i386 xerces-c-devel is needed by glest-2.0.0-1.i386 Found the first two easily enough, the xerces-c-devel is harder to find. Ric -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 18 22:29:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Nov 2006 17:29:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 210826] Review Request: genius - An arbitrary precision integer and multiple precision floatingpoint calculator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611182229.kAIMTrpe027092@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: genius - An arbitrary precision integer and multiple precision floatingpoint calculator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210826 ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2006-11-18 17:29 EST ------- Good work! Please close it and remove from Extras/SIGs/SciTech proposals page. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 18 22:32:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Nov 2006 17:32:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 171993] Review Request: mpich2 - An implementation of MPI In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611182232.kAIMWN2d027297@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mpich2 - An implementation of MPI https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=171993 rpm at greysector.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rpm at greysector.net ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2006-11-18 17:32 EST ------- Doesn't the java part build with current GCJ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 18 23:19:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Nov 2006 18:19:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214312] Review Request: xdms - Extracts Amiga DMS archives In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611182319.kAINJXaD028814@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xdms - Extracts Amiga DMS archives https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214312 ------- Additional Comments From packages at amiga-hardware.com 2006-11-18 18:19 EST ------- Latest version. Spec URL: http://dribble.org.uk/reviews/xdms.spec SRPM URL: http://dribble.org.uk/reviews/xdms-1.3.2-3.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 18 23:26:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Nov 2006 18:26:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216284] Review Request: dd2 - Dodgin' Diamond 2 - Shoot'em up arcade game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611182326.kAINQ86Y028952@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dd2 - Dodgin' Diamond 2 - Shoot'em up arcade game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216284 ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2006-11-18 18:25 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=141571) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=141571&action=view) strace output from dd2 crash The game consistently crashes when running in fullscreen mode with the nvidia binary driver from livna $ rpm -q kmod-nvidia kmod-nvidia-1.0.9629-1.2.6.18_1.2849.fc6.x86_64 If fullscreen is turned off, or if the normal xorg driver is used, then the game runs fine. It only crashes when fullscreen is used with the binary driver. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 19 01:39:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Nov 2006 20:39:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 181997] Review Request: gpc - The GNU Pascal compiler In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611190139.kAJ1dHhO031839@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gpc - The GNU Pascal compiler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=181997 rpm at greysector.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rpm at greysector.net ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2006-11-18 20:39 EST ------- I see there anything preventing this from being reviewed? If not, I'll take it up soon. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 19 01:41:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Nov 2006 20:41:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216299] New: Review Request: libEMF - A library for generating Enhanced Metafiles Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216299 Summary: Review Request: libEMF - A library for generating Enhanced Metafiles Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rpm at greysector.net QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://rpm.greysector.net/extras/libEMF.spec SRPM URL: http://rpm.greysector.net/extras/libEMF-1.0.3-1.src.rpm Description: libEMF is a library for generating Enhanced Metafiles on systems which don't natively support the ECMA-234 Graphics Device Interface (GDI). The library is intended to be used as a driver for other graphics programs such as Grace or gnuplot. Therefore, it implements a very limited subset of the GDI. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 19 01:45:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Nov 2006 20:45:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216300] New: Review Request: chemtool - A program for 2D drawing organic molecules Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216300 Summary: Review Request: chemtool - A program for 2D drawing organic molecules Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rpm at greysector.net QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://rpm.greysector.net/extras/chemtool.spec SRPM URL: http://rpm.greysector.net/extras/chemtool-1.6.9-1.src.rpm Description: Chemtool is a program for drawing organic molecules easily and store them in a variety of output formats including as a X bitmap, Xfig, SVG or EPS file. It runs under the X Window System using the GTK widget set. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 19 01:46:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Nov 2006 20:46:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216300] Review Request: chemtool - A program for 2D drawing organic molecules In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611190146.kAJ1kRoW032111@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: chemtool - A program for 2D drawing organic molecules https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216300 rpm at greysector.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |216299 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 19 01:46:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Nov 2006 20:46:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216299] Review Request: libEMF - A library for generating Enhanced Metafiles In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611190146.kAJ1kRuK032115@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libEMF - A library for generating Enhanced Metafiles https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216299 rpm at greysector.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |216300 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 19 02:02:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Nov 2006 21:02:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 181997] Review Request: gpc - The GNU Pascal compiler In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611190202.kAJ22VA0032485@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gpc - The GNU Pascal compiler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=181997 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-11-18 21:02 EST ------- This is ticket is old enough (before FC5 was out) that sizeable bits of it need to redone for current releases. Unfortunately gpc doesn't patch into gcc 4.1 so I'll have to bundle an older gcc release. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 19 03:16:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Nov 2006 22:16:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 212916] Review Request: php-pear-DB-DataObject-FormBuilder - Automatically build HTML_QuickForm objects In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611190316.kAJ3GKAO001935@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-DB-DataObject-FormBuilder - Automatically build HTML_QuickForm objects Alias: DataObj-FormBuilder https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212916 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-11-18 22:16 EST ------- The usual no-documentation warning: W: php-pear-DB-DataObject-FormBuilder no-documentation I was browsing the PEAR site and I noticed that there is actually documentation online for this package. I wonder if it wouldn't be reasonable to include a text file with at least some URLs in it: http://pear.reversefold.com/dokuwiki/doku.php?id=pear:db_dataobject_formbuilder http://opensource.21st.de/static/formbuilder/rapidprototyping-kr.pdf * source files match upstream: 0430207937449d635449389ae345854c DB_DataObject_FormBuilder-1.0.0RC5.tgz * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * dist tag is present. * build root is correct. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. License text not included upstream. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * package installs properly O rpmlint output is OK. * final provides and requires are sane: php-pear(DB_DataObject_FormBuilder) = 1.0.0 php-pear-DB-DataObject-FormBuilder = 1.0.0-0.1.RC5.fc7 = /bin/sh /usr/bin/pear php-pear(DB_DataObject) php-pear(Date) php-pear(HTML_QuickForm) php-pear(HTML_Table) php-pear(PEAR) * %check is not present; no test suite upstream. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * scriptlets are OK (pear module installation) * code, not content. * no documentation, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 19 03:43:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Nov 2006 22:43:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 212919] Review Request: php-pear-Structures-DataGrid-DataSource-DataObject - DataSource driver using PEAR::DB_DataObject In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611190343.kAJ3h3Xf002433@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Structures-DataGrid-DataSource-DataObject - DataSource driver using PEAR::DB_DataObject Alias: DG-DataSource-DO https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212919 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 19 03:52:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Nov 2006 22:52:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 212919] Review Request: php-pear-Structures-DataGrid-DataSource-DataObject - DataSource driver using PEAR::DB_DataObject In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611190352.kAJ3qk6c002597@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Structures-DataGrid-DataSource-DataObject - DataSource driver using PEAR::DB_DataObject Alias: DG-DataSource-DO https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212919 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-11-18 22:52 EST ------- The names get even longer! W: php-pear-Structures-DataGrid-DataSource-DataObject no-documentation W: php-pear-Structures-DataGrid-DataSource-DataObject filename-too-long-for-joliet php-pear-Structures-DataGrid-DataSource-DataObject-0.1.0-1.fc7.noarch.rpm I'm still operating under the assumption that this doesn't really break anything. * source files match upstream: 8779c153f7299f649b39859abbfa646d Structures_DataGrid_DataSource_DataObject-0.1.0.tgz * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * dist tag is present. * build root is correct. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. License text not included upstream. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * package installs properly O rpmlint output is OK. * final provides and requires are sane: php-pear(Structures_DataGrid_DataSource_DataObject) = 0.1.0 php-pear-Structures-DataGrid-DataSource-DataObject = 0.1.0-1.fc7 = /bin/sh /usr/bin/pear php-pear(DB_DataObject) php-pear(DB_DataObject_FormBuilder) php-pear(PEAR) php-pear(Structures_DataGrid) * %check is not present; no test suite upstream. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * scriptlets are OK (pear module installation). * code, not content. * no documentation, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 19 06:28:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2006 01:28:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216282] Review Request: mirage - A fast and simple image viewer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611190628.kAJ6SawM006064@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mirage - A fast and simple image viewer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216282 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 19 06:39:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2006 01:39:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216285] Review Request: kleansweep - Reclaim disk space by finding unneeded files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611190639.kAJ6dUNL006301@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kleansweep - Reclaim disk space by finding unneeded files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216285 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-11-19 01:39 EST ------- When i downloaded and tried to install SRPM i got error: unpacking of archive failed on file /usr/src/redhat/SOURCES/kleansweep-0.2.9.tar.bz2;455ffbc7: cpio: read -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 19 07:01:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2006 02:01:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216282] Review Request: mirage - A fast and simple image viewer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611190701.kAJ71c0C006997@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mirage - A fast and simple image viewer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216282 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-11-19 02:01 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (development i386) for FC7. + rpmlint is silent for RPM and SRPM. + source files match upstream. c87da5b76f856fd7a759a355259b76ed mirage-0.8.1.tar.bz2 + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named and is cleanly written. + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. License text included in package. + %doc is small; no -doc subpackage required. + %doc does not affect runtime. + COPYING included in %doc. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc files. + no -devel subpackage exists + no .la files included. + translations are available. + scriptlets update-desktop-database is used. + owns the directories it creates. + doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + Desktop file installed successfully + Desktop file is handled correctly in SPEC file. + GUI application + Followed Python packaging guidelines also. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 19 07:04:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2006 02:04:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216282] Review Request: mirage - A fast and simple image viewer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611190704.kAJ74gd7007098@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mirage - A fast and simple image viewer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216282 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-11-19 02:04 EST ------- Thank you. I will import this to FE when FE CVS system revives. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 19 07:07:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2006 02:07:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216282] Review Request: mirage - A fast and simple image viewer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611190707.kAJ77R24007167@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mirage - A fast and simple image viewer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216282 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-11-19 02:07 EST ------- Thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 19 07:09:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2006 02:09:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216284] Review Request: dd2 - Dodgin' Diamond 2 - Shoot'em up arcade game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611190709.kAJ79AhU007193@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dd2 - Dodgin' Diamond 2 - Shoot'em up arcade game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216284 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-11-19 02:09 EST ------- Ah what fun binary driver crap crashes. Thats why I only use opensource drivers (and select my hardware based on that criteria). Anyways I can find nothing usefull in the strace. Can you run this under gdb from the console (do "export DISPLAY=:0.0" first) and then once it crashes switch back to the console to get a backtrace? Maybe that will give us a hint on whats going on and howto work around it. If that doesn't help please go file a bug with nvidea. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 19 07:13:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2006 02:13:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216300] Review Request: chemtool - A program for 2D drawing organic molecules In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611190713.kAJ7DQh3007262@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: chemtool - A program for 2D drawing organic molecules https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216300 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-11-19 02:13 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=141574) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=141574&action=view) Mock build log of chemtool 1.6.9-1.fc7 Mockbuild fails on FC-devel i386. Please check the build log attached. NOTE: in mockbuild environ, %{_desktopdir} and etc are not defined!! (I have not yet checked precisely why). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 19 07:14:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2006 02:14:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 199919] Review Request: Asuka In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611190714.kAJ7EKlc007285@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Asuka https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199919 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-11-19 02:14 EST ------- ping again? If I still get no response within one week I'm closing this as a dead review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 19 07:14:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2006 02:14:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 199920] Review Request: Palantir In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611190714.kAJ7Eb3A007312@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Palantir https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199920 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-11-19 02:14 EST ------- ping again? If I still get no response within one week I'm closing this as a dead review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 19 07:18:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2006 02:18:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 201418] Review Request: widelands - GPL Settlers II clone In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611190718.kAJ7I1HU007393@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: widelands - GPL Settlers II clone https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201418 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-11-19 02:18 EST ------- Any luck with fixing the monitor? This is becoming a rather long story and you were very unresponsive in the glob2 review too. So I'm seriously concidering closing both the glob2 review and this on as dead reviews. SO that someone else can pick them up and resubmit them for inclusion, esp. glob2 is a very popular game and its a shame its being kept out of FE by all this/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 19 07:19:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2006 02:19:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 171993] Review Request: mpich2 - An implementation of MPI In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611190719.kAJ7JQnq007438@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mpich2 - An implementation of MPI https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=171993 ------- Additional Comments From dakingun at gmail.com 2006-11-19 02:19 EST ------- (In reply to comment #30) > Doesn't the java part build with current GCJ? Yes. For other folks watching this package, I've uploaded src rpm for mpich-1.0.4p1 and tidy up the spec so that its now installable side by side with openmpi in FC. Mark (Chappell), those unpackaged files are now taken care of. GCJ actually build them fine with appropriate configure option (see the spec for details) ftp://czar.eas.yorku.ca/pub/mpich2/mpich2-1.0.4p1-2.src.rpm ftp://czar.eas.yorku.ca/pub/mpich2/mpich2.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 19 07:20:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2006 02:20:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 205023] Review Request: filelight-1.0 - cool diskspace use browser for kde In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611190720.kAJ7Kd9n007476@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: filelight-1.0 - cool diskspace use browser for kde https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205023 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-11-19 02:20 EST ------- Neal, looks like you forgot to close this bug after importing and building the package, closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 19 08:10:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2006 03:10:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216285] Review Request: kleansweep - Reclaim disk space by finding unneeded files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611190810.kAJ8A3nr008744@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kleansweep - Reclaim disk space by finding unneeded files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216285 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-11-19 03:10 EST ------- Ok, looks like it was some download problem. Preliminary review first. Preferred value for buildroot is not present in SPEC value. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 19 08:12:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2006 03:12:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 166919] Review Request: findlib In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611190812.kAJ8CiRD008790@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: findlib https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=166919 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-11-19 03:12 EST ------- Looks like this is dead review now -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 19 08:20:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2006 03:20:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 200722] Review Request: GraphicsMagick In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611190820.kAJ8KV8G008969@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: GraphicsMagick https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200722 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |panemade at gmail.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 19 09:00:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2006 04:00:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 212715] Review Request: openvrml - VRML/X3D runtime library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611190900.kAJ90tJl011632@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: openvrml - VRML/X3D runtime library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212715 ------- Additional Comments From braden at endoframe.com 2006-11-19 04:00 EST ------- Yea! Thanks for your feedback, gentlemen. Ralf, I'm not observing the problem you describe with openvrml-mozilla-plugin using the 0.16.1-4 RPMs. Certainly the first thing to check is the presence of /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins/openvrml.so. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 19 09:23:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2006 04:23:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 201418] Review Request: widelands - GPL Settlers II clone In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611190923.kAJ9NrXC003308@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: widelands - GPL Settlers II clone https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201418 ------- Additional Comments From brkamikaze at gmail.com 2006-11-19 04:23 EST ------- The monitor arrived yesterday. It still has a few glitches, but at least it works. I'm installing the tools needed and I'll probably have a new build for glob2 and widelands today or tomorrow. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 19 09:52:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2006 04:52:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216322] New: Review Request: tailor - VCS repository conversion tool Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216322 Summary: Review Request: tailor - VCS repository conversion tool Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: dan at danny.cz QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://fedora.danny.cz/tailor.spec SRPM URL: http://fedora.danny.cz/tailor-0.9.26-1.src.rpm Description: Tailor is a tool to migrate changesets between CVS, Subversion, git, darcs, monotone, Codeville, Mercurial and Baazar-NG repositories. This script makes it easier to keep the upstream changes merged in a branch of a product, storing needed information such as the upstream URI and revision in special properties on the branched directory. Notes: - the spec file is based on the ATrpms one - rpmlint is silent on both source and binary rpms -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 19 10:12:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2006 05:12:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216299] Review Request: libEMF - A library for generating Enhanced Metafiles In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611191012.kAJAC5R7032767@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libEMF - A library for generating Enhanced Metafiles https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216299 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 19 10:21:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2006 05:21:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216299] Review Request: libEMF - A library for generating Enhanced Metafiles In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611191021.kAJALOdL000732@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libEMF - A library for generating Enhanced Metafiles https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216299 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pertusus at free.fr ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-11-19 05:21 EST ------- That's a bit strange that this package isn't already in fedora, given that gnuplot, pstoedit and grace are already there. Once the CVS is back to life I'll investigate a bit to understand what is happening. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 19 11:41:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2006 06:41:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 210189] Review Request: granule - Gtk+-based flashcards program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611191141.kAJBfR4C003721@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: granule - Gtk+-based flashcards program Alias: granule https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210189 bugs.michael at gmx.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE Bug 210189 depends on bug 210187, which changed state. Bug 210187 Summary: Review Request: libassa - C++ Object-Oriented network library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210187 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |RAWHIDE Status|NEW |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 19 11:41:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2006 06:41:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 210187] Review Request: libassa - C++ Object-Oriented network library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611191141.kAJBfURT003750@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libassa - C++ Object-Oriented network library Alias: libassa https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210187 bugs.michael at gmx.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 19 11:41:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2006 06:41:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 210187] Review Request: libassa - C++ Object-Oriented network library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611191141.kAJBfZXQ003759@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libassa - C++ Object-Oriented network library Alias: libassa https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210187 bugs.michael at gmx.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 19 12:45:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2006 07:45:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216299] Review Request: libEMF - A library for generating Enhanced Metafiles In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611191245.kAJCj98p006300@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libEMF - A library for generating Enhanced Metafiles https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216299 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-11-19 07:45 EST ------- Well, it seems that * gnuplot has its original source code (not the copy of libEMF) to support EMF output * http://libemf.sourceforge.net says that support of libEMF for grace is forthcoming * By the way http://libemf.sourceforge.net says 'this software includes patches to those programs (here gnuplot) to add the EMF as an output option, however, where is the patch? (not a blocker) * Currently FE pstoedit spec file has %configure --disable-static --without-emf --without-swf I will check this later anyway. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 19 14:22:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2006 09:22:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216299] Review Request: libEMF - A library for generating Enhanced Metafiles In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611191422.kAJEM1sS011155@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libEMF - A library for generating Enhanced Metafiles https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216299 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-11-19 09:21 EST ------- Well, first review of libEMF 1. From http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines : * Licensing - Include license document(s). * Use rpmlint ------------------------------------------------------ E: libEMF-debuginfo script-without-shebang /usr/src/debug/libEMF-1.0.3/libemf/libemf.h W: libEMF-devel summary-not-capitalized libEMF header files ------------------------------------------------------ - The formar issue is permission problem. Change the permission to 0644. - The latter issue can be ignored, in my opinion. * Timestamps - -devel package includes many header files and keeping timestamps on these files is preferred as it makes clear - when those files are written - whether those files are modified by vendor So please keep timestamps on those files. Under my check, this can be done by using: ------------------------------------------------------- %install rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT export CPPROG="cp -p" %{__make} install \ DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT ------------------------------------------------------- 2. From http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines : (= Okay) 3. Other things I have noticed: * %check Well, this package has tests/ directory and some tests are included, so I think including %check script in the spec is a good idea. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 19 15:58:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2006 10:58:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 199029] Review Request: jokosher In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611191558.kAJFw2i3014516@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jokosher https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199029 bdpepple at ameritech.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |213798 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 19 15:58:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2006 10:58:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213798] Review Request: python-alsaaudio - Python Alsa Bindings In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611191558.kAJFwZKs014556@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-alsaaudio - Python Alsa Bindings https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213798 bdpepple at ameritech.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |199029 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 19 16:34:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2006 11:34:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216299] Review Request: libEMF - A library for generating Enhanced Metafiles In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611191634.kAJGYJcH015693@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libEMF - A library for generating Enhanced Metafiles https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216299 ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2006-11-19 11:34 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > Well, first review of libEMF > > 1. From http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines : > * Licensing > - Include license document(s). Done. > * Use rpmlint I already did... > ------------------------------------------------------ > E: libEMF-debuginfo script-without-shebang > /usr/src/debug/libEMF-1.0.3/libemf/libemf.h > W: libEMF-devel summary-not-capitalized libEMF header files > ------------------------------------------------------ > - The formar issue is permission problem. Change the permission to > 0644. How? This is an automatically generated -debuginfo package. > - The latter issue can be ignored, in my opinion. OK. > * Timestamps > - -devel package includes many header files and keeping timestamps > on these files is preferred as it makes clear > - when those files are written > - whether those files are modified by vendor > So please keep timestamps on those files. > Under my check, this can be done by using: > ------------------------------------------------------- > %install > rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT > > export CPPROG="cp -p" > %{__make} install \ > DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT > ------------------------------------------------------- Done. Although I'm surprised you've asked for this. This is the first time I've ever seen this trick. > 2. From http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines : > (= Okay) > > 3. Other things I have noticed: > * %check > Well, this package has tests/ directory and some tests are > included, so I think including %check script in the spec is > a good idea. Added. http://rpm.greysector.net/extras/libEMF.spec http://rpm.greysector.net/extras/libEMF-1.0.3-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 19 16:40:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2006 11:40:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216299] Review Request: libEMF - A library for generating Enhanced Metafiles In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611191640.kAJGe16D015957@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libEMF - A library for generating Enhanced Metafiles https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216299 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-11-19 11:39 EST ------- Well, before checking 1.0.3-2: (In reply to comment #4) > (In reply to comment #3) > > ------------------------------------------------------ > > E: libEMF-debuginfo script-without-shebang > > /usr/src/debug/libEMF-1.0.3/libemf/libemf.h > > ------------------------------------------------------ > > - The formar issue is permission problem. Change the permission to > > 0644. > > How? This is an automatically generated -debuginfo package. Just: --------------------------------------------- chmod 0644 libemf/libemf.h --------------------------------------------- at the last of %prep stage. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 19 17:03:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2006 12:03:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216300] Review Request: chemtool - A program for 2D drawing organic molecules In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611191703.kAJH3Qrr016803@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: chemtool - A program for 2D drawing organic molecules https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216300 ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2006-11-19 12:03 EST ------- rpm --showrc on FC6 does have it. Anyway, I replaced those macros: http://rpm.greysector.net/extras/chemtool.spec http://rpm.greysector.net/extras/chemtool-1.6.9-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 19 17:23:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2006 12:23:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216300] Review Request: chemtool - A program for 2D drawing organic molecules In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611191723.kAJHN62g017865@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: chemtool - A program for 2D drawing organic molecules https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216300 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-11-19 12:23 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=141586) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=141586&action=view) Mock build log of chemtool 1.6.9-2.fc7 Umm.. still not okay. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 19 17:28:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2006 12:28:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216300] Review Request: chemtool - A program for 2D drawing organic molecules In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611191728.kAJHSRFc018221@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: chemtool - A program for 2D drawing organic molecules https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216300 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-11-19 12:28 EST ------- etc is defined as %{_sysconfdir} I'm not sure, but you may also need the scriptlet... http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets?highlight=%28snippets%29%7C%28script%29#head-7103f6c38d1b5735e8477bdd569ad73ea2c49bda -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 19 17:31:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2006 12:31:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216299] Review Request: libEMF - A library for generating Enhanced Metafiles In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611191731.kAJHVdE5018577@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libEMF - A library for generating Enhanced Metafiles https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216299 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-11-19 12:31 EST ------- Okay, please add the line --------------------------------------------- chmod 0644 libemf/libemf.h --------------------------------------------- at the last of %prep to avoid rpmlint complaint of -debuginfo rpm. All things else are okay. ---------------------------------------- This package (libEMF) is APPROVED by me ---------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 19 17:33:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2006 12:33:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 212715] Review Request: openvrml - VRML/X3D runtime library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611191733.kAJHXCt0018715@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: openvrml - VRML/X3D runtime library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212715 rc040203 at freenet.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2006-11-19 12:33 EST ------- (In reply to comment #22) > Ralf, I'm not observing the problem you describe with openvrml-mozilla-plugin > using the 0.16.1-4 RPMs. I still observe it and haven't got the faintest clue about what might be going on :(. ATM, I am inclined to blame (wild guesses!!) a firefox upgrade having happened since having built the openvrml rpms (I have seen this happening several times with other plugins and former upgrades of firefox), my very friend SELinux (It's currently nagging me all over the place) and/or prelink .( > Certainly the first thing to check is the presence of > /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins/openvrml.so. Of cause it's present. I imported the rpms into a local yum repository and used a standard "yum install" to install the plugin. Anyway, I officially sponsored you. The next step would be to import your srpm into FE's CVS and to request a build. Unfortunately, AFAICT, right now FE's CVS is broken and awaiting fixing. According to it's maintainer "on Monday" (US-time). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 19 17:34:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2006 12:34:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216300] Review Request: chemtool - A program for 2D drawing organic molecules In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611191734.kAJHYga5018834@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: chemtool - A program for 2D drawing organic molecules https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216300 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-11-19 12:34 EST ------- Actually I have not yet checked this package precisely as recently I use mockbuild and I will not check the package unless build succeeds...... NOTE: my environ is FC-devel i386. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 19 17:39:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2006 12:39:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216299] Review Request: libEMF - A library for generating Enhanced Metafiles In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611191739.kAJHd8NC019273@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libEMF - A library for generating Enhanced Metafiles https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216299 ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2006-11-19 12:39 EST ------- Ah, sorry. I feel dumb now for not seeing this. Thanks for the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 19 17:42:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2006 12:42:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216300] Review Request: chemtool - A program for 2D drawing organic molecules In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611191742.kAJHgIe9019495@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: chemtool - A program for 2D drawing organic molecules https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216300 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-11-19 12:42 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=141588) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=141588&action=view) rpmbuild build log of chemtool 1.6.9-2.fc7 Umm... rpmbuild succeeded. >From diff of the two files I attached, it seems that some BR are missing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 19 18:12:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2006 13:12:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 190213] Review Request: gq - Graphical LDAP directory browser and editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611191812.kAJICE8Q021671@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gq - Graphical LDAP directory browser and editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190213 fedora at christoph-wickert.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From fedora at christoph-wickert.de 2006-11-19 13:12 EST ------- (In reply to comment #14) > Updated to gq-1.2.1, I did this some time ago, but something is this version > broke the install of po files. I was waiting for upstream do a new release. You need to copy LINGUAS from gq-%{version}-langpack-1/po to the main packages po dir before compiling, e. g. like this: # Set up langpack %{name}-%{version}-langpack-1/langpack . %{__cp} -p %{name}-%{version}-langpack-1/po/LINGUAS po/ ... Then re-add %find_lang and %files -f %{name}.lang to the spec. Some more things I'd like to you to fix, before I do the complete review: - Please BuildRequire "perl(XML::Parser)" instead of perl-XML-Parser (better user the name of the perl module than the hardcoded package name) - duplicate BuildRequires: gtk2-devel and libxml2-devel are already required by libglade2-devel. - no need to run /sbin/ldconfig in %post, we don't have no shared libs here - please use the scriptlets from the wiki for update-mime-database, see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets#head-5f93ed83c968bb73b052c06ba0d7139e28f35d93 If you are "stealing" something (your own words from changelog), why not steal from the wiki? ;) - The icon is missing, at least here on Core 6. "redhat-system-tools" is outdated, now it's "redhat-system_tools" (note the underscore). - Don't add the category X-Fedora to gq.desktop, it's not necessary any longer. In fact it never was. - Minor: Can you make your desktop file look more like the upstream one? I'd like to see the multilingual names and comments included. - Minor: you could simplify the %files section a little more, e.g. you could replace %{_datadir}/%{name}/%{name}.glade and %dir %{_datadir}/%{name} with a single "%{_datadir}/%{name}/". This is ok as long as all files in the dir should be owned by gq, which is the case for %{_datadir}/%{name} and %{_datadir}/pixmaps/%{name}. If you however prefer a more detailed listing this is ok too, it will prevent you from accidentally packaging unwanted files. - Minor: Although your defattr is valid I suggest you use "%defattr(-,root,root,-)" instead. This is FE default and looks cleaner. You can also remove the superfluous macros: "%{__make}" "%{__install}" or "%{__rm}" or don't have a practical benefit over make, install or rm. - Minor: Please fix the last changelog entry: Nov 12th was Sun, not Sat. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 19 18:25:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2006 13:25:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 212715] Review Request: openvrml - VRML/X3D runtime library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611191825.kAJIPwC9022727@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: openvrml - VRML/X3D runtime library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212715 ------- Additional Comments From braden at endoframe.com 2006-11-19 13:25 EST ------- IME, it can be useful to copy the firefox launcher script to your home directory and edit it such that useful console output doesn't get sent to /dev/null. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 19 19:45:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2006 14:45:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 190213] Review Request: gq - Graphical LDAP directory browser and editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611191945.kAJJjxxw025880@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gq - Graphical LDAP directory browser and editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190213 ------- Additional Comments From terjeros at phys.ntnu.no 2006-11-19 14:45 EST ------- > Some more things I'd like to you to fix, before I do the complete review: Most things should be fixed now, from the changelog: - Fix defattr - Remove X-Fedora as category in desktop file - libglade2-devel pulls in gtk2-devel and libxml2-devel in BuildReq - Use perl modules, not perl package name in BuildReq - Remove ldconfig from %%post - Fix install of translations - Remove some macros (rm, make and install) - Drop desktop-file-utils from BuildReq - Fix mime: script and remove shared-mime-info from BuildReq - Patch, not replace desktop file - Switch icon to redhat-system_tools Thanks for the initial review and the LINGUAS trick. Updates files: SPEC: http://www.pvv.ntnu.no/~terjeros/rpms/gq/gq.spec SRPMS: http://www.pvv.ntnu.no/~terjeros/rpms/gq/gq-1.2.1-3.fc6.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 19 19:47:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2006 14:47:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216300] Review Request: chemtool - A program for 2D drawing organic molecules In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611191947.kAJJlQVj026058@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: chemtool - A program for 2D drawing organic molecules https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216300 ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2006-11-19 14:47 EST ------- Builds in mock devel/x86_64 now. Added those scriptlets, too. http://rpm.greysector.net/extras/chemtool.spec http://rpm.greysector.net/extras/chemtool-1.6.9-3.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 19 20:37:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2006 15:37:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216352] New: Review Request: vdr-sudoku - Sudoku plugin for VDR Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216352 Summary: Review Request: vdr-sudoku - Sudoku plugin for VDR Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: ville.skytta at iki.fi QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com http://cachalot.mine.nu/6/SRPMS/vdr-sudoku.spec http://cachalot.mine.nu/6/SRPMS/vdr-sudoku-0.1.2-0.6.cmn6.src.rpm This is a VDR plugin to generate and solve number place puzzles, so called Sudokus. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 19 20:38:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2006 15:38:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 195645] Review Request: rasqal - RDF query library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611192038.kAJKcbBZ028228@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rasqal - RDF query library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195645 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |kevin at tummy.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-11-19 15:38 EST ------- Thanks for changing the makeinstall... here's a review: OK - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines OK - Spec file matches base package name. OK - Spec has consistant macro usage. OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines. OK - License (LGPL or apache 2.0) OK - License field in spec matches OK - License file included in package OK - Spec in American English OK - Spec is legible. OK - Sources match upstream md5sum: 403b95de5c23124f6a6491bdde3eba86 rasqal-0.9.12.tar.gz 403b95de5c23124f6a6491bdde3eba86 rasqal-0.9.12.tar.gz.1 See below - BuildRequires correct OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. OK - Package has a correct %clean section. OK - Package has correct buildroot OK - Package is code or permissible content. OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime. OK - Headers/static libs in -devel subpackage. OK - Spec has needed ldconfig in post and postun See below - .pc files in -devel subpackage/requires pkgconfig OK - .so files in -devel subpackage. OK - -devel package Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} OK - .la files are removed. OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch. OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files. OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. OK - Package owns all the directories it creates. See below - No rpmlint output. OK - final provides and requires are sane: SHOULD Items: OK - Should build in mock. OK (386/x86_64) - Should build on all supported archs OK - Should have subpackages require base package with fully versioned depend. OK - Should have dist tag See below - Should package latest version Issues: 1. 0.9.13 seems to be out, might update to that? 2. Are there some missing BuildRequires? checking for pcre-config... no checking for pcre-config... no checking for pcre... not present checking for xml2-config... no checking for libxml2 library... no 3. The devel subpackage has a .pc, so should Requires: pkgconfig? 4. rpmlint says: W: rasqal invalid-license LGPL or Apache Software License 2.0 W: rasqal invalid-license LGPL or Apache Software License 2.0 W: rasqal-debuginfo invalid-license LGPL or Apache Software License 2.0 W: rasqal-devel invalid-license LGPL or Apache Software License 2.0 This can be ignored as discussed above. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 19 20:47:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2006 15:47:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216353] New: Review Request: vdr-text2skin - OSD skin plugin for VDR Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216353 Summary: Review Request: vdr-text2skin - OSD skin plugin for VDR Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: ville.skytta at iki.fi QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com http://cachalot.mine.nu/6/SRPMS/vdr-text2skin.spec http://cachalot.mine.nu/6/SRPMS/vdr-text2skin-1.1-16.20051217cvs.cmn6.src.rpm This plugin is designed to load and interpret a set of files describing the layout of VDR's on screen display and to make this "skin" available to VDR via Setup -> OSD in the main menu. Of course it is possible to load more than one text-based skin this way and to choose between them while running VDR. All skins may be themeable (you can create your own color-theme) and translateable as the author of the skin wishes. Notes: The release tag does not follow naming guidelines for pre-release snapshots. That's cosmetic and intentional and required for upgradeability from my earlier packages elsewhere. The %pre scriptlet is not pretty, but it's again there for historical reasons and I figure doing the necessary bits of evil before this package enters FE instead of while it's in is better. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 19 20:49:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2006 15:49:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216354] New: Review Request: liquidwar - Multiplayer wargame with liquid armies Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216354 Summary: Review Request: liquidwar - Multiplayer wargame with liquid armies Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/liquidwar.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/liquidwar-5.6.3-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: Liquid War is a unique multiplayer wargame. You control an army of liquid and have to try and eat your opponents. A single player mode is available, but the game is definitely designed to be multiplayer, and has network support. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 19 20:51:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2006 15:51:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216355] New: Review Request: vdr-skins - Collection of OSD skins for VDR Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216355 Summary: Review Request: vdr-skins - Collection of OSD skins for VDR Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: ville.skytta at iki.fi QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com http://cachalot.mine.nu/6/SRPMS/vdr-skins.spec http://cachalot.mine.nu/6/SRPMS/vdr-skins-20061119-1.cmn6.src.rpm This package contains a collection of skins for VDR's on-screen display. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 19 20:51:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2006 15:51:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216353] Review Request: vdr-text2skin - OSD skin plugin for VDR In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611192051.kAJKpfVP028802@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vdr-text2skin - OSD skin plugin for VDR https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216353 ville.skytta at iki.fi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |216355 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 19 20:51:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2006 15:51:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216355] Review Request: vdr-skins - Collection of OSD skins for VDR In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611192051.kAJKpehn028794@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vdr-skins - Collection of OSD skins for VDR https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216355 ville.skytta at iki.fi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |216353 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 19 20:52:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2006 15:52:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215659] Review Request: python-daap - A DAAP client implemented in Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611192052.kAJKqhBN028839@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-daap - A DAAP client implemented in Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215659 ------- Additional Comments From Jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2006-11-19 15:52 EST ------- Good: + License ok, package contains verbatin copy of the license text. + Naming confirm with name convention. On the project page was a posting about a severe problem. It will be nice to give me a method to test the library, becouse it seems to be very unstable. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 19 20:55:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2006 15:55:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 203864] Review Request: tripwire - IDS In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611192055.kAJKtvJh028938@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tripwire - IDS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203864 ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2006-11-19 15:55 EST ------- Builds fine in devel/x86_64 mock. Some more issues: BuildRequires: autoconf seems to be unnecessary. Was there any reason to have it? Could you remove that: # Print getting started help message if [ $1 -eq 1 ]; then %{__cat} %_docdir/%{name}-%{version}/README.RPM fi from %post and (optionally) rename README.RPM to README.Fedora? Additionally, you can change %defattr to read: %defattr(644,root,root,755) and remove %attr(644,root,root) from some files below. I'm also unsure if %dir %{_var}/lib/tripwire/report should be readable by everyone. Or maybe %{_var}/lib/tripwire, too. After all, I think only root will be using tripwire, as it needs access to all files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 19 21:30:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2006 16:30:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 190213] Review Request: gq - Graphical LDAP directory browser and editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611192130.kAJLUNKC029929@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gq - Graphical LDAP directory browser and editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190213 ------- Additional Comments From terjeros at phys.ntnu.no 2006-11-19 16:30 EST ------- Updated to 1.2.2 SPEC: http://www.pvv.ntnu.no/~terjeros/rpms/gq/gq.spec SRPMS: http://www.pvv.ntnu.no/~terjeros/rpms/gq/gq-1.2.2-1.fc6.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 19 22:01:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2006 17:01:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216285] Review Request: kleansweep - Reclaim disk space by finding unneeded files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611192201.kAJM1YVa030797@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kleansweep - Reclaim disk space by finding unneeded files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216285 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2006-11-19 17:01 EST ------- what do you mean ? %{buildroot} is a blocker ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 19 22:02:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2006 17:02:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216130] Review Request: glest - 3D real time strategy game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611192202.kAJM2lw2030834@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glest - 3D real time strategy game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216130 ------- Additional Comments From gauret at free.fr 2006-11-19 17:02 EST ------- See bug 210553 (this bug depends on it) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 19 22:04:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2006 17:04:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216131] Review Request: glest-data - Data files for the game Glest In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611192204.kAJM4r4G030916@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glest-data - Data files for the game Glest https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216131 ------- Additional Comments From gauret at free.fr 2006-11-19 17:04 EST ------- The objective of splitting into two spec file it to make glest-data noarch. This way this large package only appears once for all arches on the repos. To my knowledge, this is impossible with a single spec file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 19 22:54:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2006 17:54:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216285] Review Request: kleansweep - Reclaim disk space by finding unneeded files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611192254.kAJMsEaf000975@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kleansweep - Reclaim disk space by finding unneeded files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216285 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-11-19 17:54 EST ------- > %{buildroot} is a blocker ? To some reviewer, yes. Fortunately, fixing it is easy. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 19 23:08:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2006 18:08:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216285] Review Request: kleansweep - Reclaim disk space by finding unneeded files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611192308.kAJN8nfF001487@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kleansweep - Reclaim disk space by finding unneeded files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216285 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2006-11-19 18:08 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > > %{buildroot} is a blocker ? > > To some reviewer, yes. Fortunately, fixing it is easy. Ok! Fixed to please Paragn: Spec URL: http://chitlesh.googlepages.com/kleansweep.spec SRPM URL: http://chitlesh.googlepages.com/kleansweep-0.2.9-1.src.rpm However, I would like to document about this, any url ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 19 23:44:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2006 18:44:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216363] New: Review Request: labyrinth - Simple but powerful mind-mapping software for GNOME Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216363 Summary: Review Request: labyrinth - Simple but powerful mind- mapping software for GNOME Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: peter at thecodergeek.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://thecodergeek.com/downloads/fedora/labyrinth.spec SRPM URL: http://thecodergeek.com/downloads/fedora/labyrinth-0.3-1.src.rpm Description: (Taken from the website's "About" page, as well as Wikipedia's explanation of a mind-map.) Labyrinth is a lightweight mind-mapping tool, written in Python using Gtk and Cairo to do the drawing. It is intended to be as light and intuitive as possible, but still provide a wide range of powerful features. A mind-map is a diagram used to represent words, ideas, tasks or other items linked to and arranged radially around a central key word or idea. It is used to generate, visualize, structure and classify ideas, and as an aid in study, organization, problem solving, and decision making. rpmlint is silent on both source and binary (noarch) RPMs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 20 00:00:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2006 19:00:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 190213] Review Request: gq - Graphical LDAP directory browser and editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611200000.kAK00w9E003756@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gq - Graphical LDAP directory browser and editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190213 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at christoph-wickert.de 2006-11-19 19:00 EST ------- Thanks, you are pretty fast with your update. You will have to update your package if there will be a language pacak for 1.2.2. Anyway, here we go: REVIEW for c1b303242245dd6fc2c04bb1a9d020b6 gq-1.2.2-1.fc6.src.rpm FAIL - rpmlint isn't happy with your srpm: $ rpmlint gq-1.2.2-1.fc6.src.rpm W: gq patch-not-applied Patch01: gq-1.2.1-desktop.patch This is because the patch is defined as Patch01:, but it's called with %patch1. You should change it to Patch0: anyway, since it's the first patch. Same for Source: and Source01:, should be Source0: and Source1: instead. rpmlint on the binaries is clean. OK - package meets naming guidelines OK - specfile named correctly OK - package meets packaging guidelines OK - license open-source compatible (GPL) OK - license included in source OK - license field in specfile machtes actual license OK - license included in %doc OK - specfile in American English OK - specfile is legible OK - source matches upstream OK - package builds for Core 6 on i386 OK - BuildRequires are correct, not exeptions, no duplicates OK - locales are handled correctly with %find_lang.sh OK - package is not relocatable OK - package owns all directories that it creates OK - no duplicate files in the %files listing OK - permissions are set properly, correct %defattr: OK - %clean section present OK - macro usage consistent (using macro style) OK - code, not content OK - no large docs OK - docs don't affect the program's runtime OK - no headers static libs or pc files OK - no need for a devel package OK - no libtool archives OK - package correctly uses desktop-file-install OK - package doesn't own dirs already owned by other packages OK - package works as described OK - package uses scriptlets from the wiki FAIL - package doesn't build in mock, an error occurs while building the locales: > Making all in po > make[2]: Entering directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/gq-1.2.2/po' > file=`echo cs | sed 's,.*/,,'`.gmo \ > && rm -f $file && -o $file cs.po > /bin/sh: line 1: -o: command not found > make[2]: *** [cs.gmo] Error 127 > make[2]: Leaving directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/gq-1.2.2/po' > make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 > make[1]: Leaving directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/gq-1.2.2' > make: *** [all] Error 2 > error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.23553 (%build) the 4th line should be > && rm -f $file && /usr/bin/msgfmt -o $file cs.po You need to BuildRequire gettext to provide msgfmt. FIX - Remove the line about desktop-file-utils from changelog entry of 1.2.1-3. The line is wrong, desktop-file-utils is still included in your spec and this is correct. Simply drop that line. FIX - Although the package builds in mock you should add a buildrequirement on libgcrypt-devel (configure checks for /usr/bin/libgcrypt-config) FIX? - You should also consider libgpg-error-devel, it's used if available too. I have to admit don't know if it adds any value to the package, but IMO it can't hurt. MINOR - After you have removed useless macros you can also replace "%{__cp} -p" with a simple "cp" (when copying LINGUAS) MINOR - IMHO %post and %postun should not be after the %files section MINOR - You can make %post and %post un a little smarter > %post -p update-mime-database %{_datadir}/mime &> /dev/null || : > > %postun -p update-mime-database %{_datadir}/mime &> /dev/null || : This has the advantage the rpm will automagically care for the requirement on update-mime-database/shared-mime-info Please fix the blockers (FAIL and FIX), so that I can approve the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 20 00:11:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2006 19:11:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216285] Review Request: kleansweep - Reclaim disk space by finding unneeded files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611200011.kAK0BcbF004453@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kleansweep - Reclaim disk space by finding unneeded files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216285 ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2006-11-19 19:11 EST ------- The preferred value for %buildroot in FE is described at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-f196e7b2477c2f5dd97ef64e8eacddfb517f1aa1 Please note that the last link you have provided was probably meant to be http://chitlesh.googlepages.com/kleansweep-0.2.9-2.src.rpm because you did correctly increase the release tag in the spec file and recreate the new src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 20 00:20:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2006 19:20:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 190213] Review Request: gq - Graphical LDAP directory browser and editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611200020.kAK0KQx4004780@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gq - Graphical LDAP directory browser and editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190213 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at christoph-wickert.de 2006-11-19 19:20 EST ------- (In reply to comment #18) > > FIX? - You should also consider libgpg-error-devel, it's used if available too. Oops, I just realized that it's already required by libgcrypt-devel, so that would be a duplicate BR. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 20 00:26:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2006 19:26:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216285] Review Request: kleansweep - Reclaim disk space by finding unneeded files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611200026.kAK0Q2Pg004909@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kleansweep - Reclaim disk space by finding unneeded files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216285 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2006-11-19 19:26 EST ------- My bad, I've misunderstood the whole concept. lol Updated: Spec URL: http://chitlesh.googlepages.com/kleansweep.spec SRPM URL: http://chitlesh.googlepages.com/kleansweep-0.2.9-3.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 20 01:01:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2006 20:01:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 206871] Review Request: ekg2 - Multi-protocol instant messaging and chat client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611200101.kAK110sB007666@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ekg2 - Multi-protocol instant messaging and chat client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206871 ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2006-11-19 20:00 EST ------- http://rpm.greysector.net/extras/ekg2.spec http://rpm.greysector.net/extras/ekg2-0-0.2.20061119.src.rpm This one actually builds in mock. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 20 01:24:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2006 20:24:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 168690] Review Request: pyBackPack (GTK+ Python backup tool) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611200124.kAK1OOo2008986@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyBackPack (GTK+ Python backup tool) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=168690 ------- Additional Comments From andy at andrewprice.me.uk 2006-11-19 20:24 EST ------- More progress - fixed some more nasty bugs and ended up making two minor releases this weekend. The latest of which is 0.4.4. I tried my hand at building an RPM too, for your convenience: Spec: http://andrewprice.me.uk/projects/pybackpack/download/pybackpack.spec SRPM: http://andrewprice.me.uk/projects/pybackpack/download/pybackpack-0.4.4-1.src.rpm RPM: http://andrewprice.me.uk/projects/pybackpack/download/pybackpack-0.4.4-1.noarch.rpm Hope I packaged it correctly. I ran rpmlint over the resulting files and it said nothing anyway. Feedback much appreciated. Bernard, if you want to avoid the hassle of filing those bugs you're welcome to email them to me and I'll deal with them. Thanks all. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 20 01:29:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2006 20:29:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 177134] Review Request: mkvtoolnix - Matroska container utilites In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611200129.kAK1TQrZ009205@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mkvtoolnix - Matroska container utilites https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177134 ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2006-11-19 20:29 EST ------- http://rpm.greysector.net/extras/mkvtoolnix-1.8.0-1.src.rpm http://rpm.greysector.net/extras/mkvtoolnix.spec Included all Matthias' suggestions (except renaming base64tool). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 20 02:15:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2006 21:15:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215659] Review Request: python-daap - A DAAP client implemented in Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611200215.kAK2FmkW011415@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-daap - A DAAP client implemented in Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215659 ------- Additional Comments From jeff at ocjtech.us 2006-11-19 21:15 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > > On the project page was a posting about a severe problem. It will be > nice to give me a method to test the library, becouse it seems to be > very unstable. I think that the comment that you refer to was posted before the 0.4 version was released. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 20 02:20:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2006 21:20:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215883] Review Request: idioskopos - C++ Introspection Library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611200220.kAK2KP5s011508@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: idioskopos - C++ Introspection Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215883 ------- Additional Comments From rvinyard at cs.nmsu.edu 2006-11-19 21:20 EST ------- New release. Adds libxml++ dependency. Spec URL: http://miskatonic.cs.nmsu.edu/pub/idioskopos.spec SRPM URL: http://miskatonic.cs.nmsu.edu/pub/idioskopos-0.3.0-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 20 03:14:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2006 22:14:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 180092] Review Request: NRPE - Monitoring agent for Nagios In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611200314.kAK3Ej61013437@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: NRPE - Monitoring agent for Nagios https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=180092 ------- Additional Comments From dennis at ausil.us 2006-11-19 22:14 EST ------- package meets naming and packaging guidelines. specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. dist tag is present. build root is correct. %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) license field matches the actual license. license is open source-compatible. GPL License text is not included in package. source files match upstream: 22afa197db8e4e5b13fac48636917b6d ../SOURCES/nrpe-2.5.2.tar.gz 22afa197db8e4e5b13fac48636917b6d nrpe-2.5.2.tar.gz latest version is being packaged. BuildRequires are proper. package builds in mock ( fc5,fc6,devel on x86_64 and i386 ). rpmlint is silent. final provides and requires are sane: nagios-plugins-nrpe-2.5.2-3.fc6.x86_64.rpm check_nrpe nagios-plugins-nrpe = 2.5.2-3.fc6 libcrypto.so.6()(64bit) libnsl.so.1()(64bit) libssl.so.6()(64bit) nagios-plugins nrpe-2.5.2-3.fc6.x86_64.rpm config(nrpe) = 2.5.2-3.fc6 nrpe = 2.5.2-3.fc6 /sbin/chkconfig /sbin/service /usr/sbin/useradd config(nrpe) = 2.5.2-3.fc6 libcrypto.so.6()(64bit) libnsl.so.1()(64bit) libssl.so.6()(64bit) libwrap.so.0()(64bit) no shared libraries are present. package is not relocatable. owns the directories it creates. doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. no duplicates in %files. file permissions are appropriate. %clean is present. code, not content. documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. no headers. no pkgconfig files. no libtool .la droppings. not a GUI app. not a web app. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 20 03:58:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2006 22:58:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216300] Review Request: chemtool - A program for 2D drawing organic molecules In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611200358.kAK3wDle015672@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: chemtool - A program for 2D drawing organic molecules https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216300 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 20 04:15:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2006 23:15:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216300] Review Request: chemtool - A program for 2D drawing organic molecules In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611200415.kAK4FAwr016877@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: chemtool - A program for 2D drawing organic molecules https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216300 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-11-19 23:15 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=141615) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=141615&action=view) rpmbuild build log of chemtool 1.6.9-3.fc7 This time mockbuild succeeds, however, rpmbuild fails. >From configure and your spec file (1.6.9-3), it seems that if the directory /usr/share/mimelnk or /usr/share/mime-info exists, 'make install' tries to install some extra files. Check your configure option -------------------------------------- --with-kdedir=%{_prefix} \ --with-gnomedir=%{_prefix} -------------------------------------- , around the line 4534-4581 of configure, and the build log by rpmbuild attached. Currently /usr/share/mimelnk are owned by kdelibs and OOo-core (OOo=openoffice.org), /usr/share/mime-info is owned by OOo-core. So if one of these rpms is installed, rpmbuild fails. (Note: /usr/share/mime-info is not owned by gnome-mime-data, however some files under /usr/share/mime-info are owned by gnome-mime-data) You can fix this by either the following. * BuildRequire kdelibs and gnome-mime-data (or OOo-core!) and fix your spec file so that extra files installed by 'make install' are correctly removed * Use 'rm -f' against possibly installed extra files (not 'rm') I think this is the best idea. * Pass the directory which does not exist to configure option. i.e. --with-kdedir=the_directory_which_does_not_seem_to_exist . -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 20 04:16:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2006 23:16:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216300] Review Request: chemtool - A program for 2D drawing organic molecules In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611200416.kAK4Gx88016916@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: chemtool - A program for 2D drawing organic molecules https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216300 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #141615|0 |1 is obsolete| | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-11-19 23:16 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=141616) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=141616&action=view) rpmbuild build log of chemtool 1.6.9-3.fc7 (correct one) Oops... this is the correct build log. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 20 04:21:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2006 23:21:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216285] Review Request: kleansweep - Reclaim disk space by finding unneeded files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611200421.kAK4LEKv017055@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kleansweep - Reclaim disk space by finding unneeded files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216285 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-11-19 23:21 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and RPMS. + source files match upstream. eb4530dc77fbe35ede8267e89275e5e9 kleansweep-0.2.9.tar.bz2 + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. License text included in package. + %doc is small; no -doc subpackage required. + %doc does not affect runtime. + COPYING included in %doc. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage exists + Used gtk-update-icon-cache correctly + no .la files. + no translations are available + Dose owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + Desktop file installed succesfully + Desktop file is handled correclty in SPEC file. + GUI app APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 20 04:27:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2006 23:27:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 198098] Review Request: xarchiver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611200427.kAK4RLO1017494@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xarchiver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198098 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-11-19 23:27 EST ------- (In reply to comment #9) > I'd like to see this package in as well... > > According to http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/Policy/StalledReviews > we should add a comment that this review is considered stalled, and will be > closed in 1 week if there is no response. Consider this that comment. ;) > > Christoph: Can you wait a week and if no response submit your package in a new > review request (after closing this one)? > Now one week passed...... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 20 04:33:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2006 23:33:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 198098] Review Request: xarchiver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611200433.kAK4XifU017815@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xarchiver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198098 splinux25 at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 20 04:34:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2006 23:34:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215241] Review Request: thunar-archive-plugin - Archive plugin for the Thunar file manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611200434.kAK4YHm0017866@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: thunar-archive-plugin - Archive plugin for the Thunar file manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215241 Bug 215241 depends on bug 198098, which changed state. Bug 198098 Summary: Review Request: xarchiver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198098 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |WONTFIX Status|NEEDINFO |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 20 04:38:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2006 23:38:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 198098] Review Request: xarchiver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611200438.kAK4cJj5017985@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xarchiver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198098 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |201449 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-11-19 23:38 EST ------- Marking this as FE-DEADREVIEW. If new review request of xarchiver is opened, please mark this as DUPLICATE of the new bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 20 04:48:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2006 23:48:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 200722] Review Request: GraphicsMagick In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611200448.kAK4mwBg018669@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: GraphicsMagick https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200722 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-11-19 23:48 EST ------- Andreas, Is there any updates to package here? Otherwise i can go for Official Review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 20 04:55:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2006 23:55:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215165] Review Request: audacious-plugins - Plugins for the Audacious media player In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611200455.kAK4t0eY018952@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: audacious-plugins - Plugins for the Audacious media player https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215165 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-11-19 23:54 EST ------- Ralf, Got any working solution?may be then you can do make a-p own audacious-libs. Just a thought. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 20 05:43:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 00:43:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 200722] Review Request: GraphicsMagick In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611200543.kAK5hnLT020217@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: GraphicsMagick https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200722 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-11-20 00:43 EST ------- Oki had a look at packaging of this software and found that GraphicsMagick-devel reporting files listed as twice. keep only %{_includedir}/GraphicsMagick and remove other 2 lines starting with %{_includedir}. Reupdate package by changing release tag. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 20 05:57:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 00:57:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216363] Review Request: labyrinth - Simple but powerful mind-mapping software for GNOME In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611200557.kAK5vLFs021115@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: labyrinth - Simple but powerful mind-mapping software for GNOME https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216363 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 20 06:45:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 01:45:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216363] Review Request: labyrinth - Simple but powerful mind-mapping software for GNOME In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611200645.kAK6jAfx023644@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: labyrinth - Simple but powerful mind-mapping software for GNOME https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216363 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-11-20 01:45 EST ------- Did mock build and found under build.log *** Icon cache not updated. After install, run this: *** gtk-update-icon-cache -f -t /usr/share/icons/hicolor -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 20 08:19:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 03:19:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215165] Review Request: audacious-plugins - Plugins for the Audacious media player In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611200819.kAK8JD3x028214@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: audacious-plugins - Plugins for the Audacious media player https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215165 ------- Additional Comments From redhat-bugzilla at camperquake.de 2006-11-20 03:19 EST ------- I think I will make a-p own /usr/lib/audacious. This does not solve the question which package is to be removed first (audacious or a-p), but at least the directory structure will be cleanly installable and removable. Modified packages forthcoming. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 20 09:04:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 04:04:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216363] Review Request: labyrinth - Simple but powerful mind-mapping software for GNOME In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611200904.kAK9471j000337@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: labyrinth - Simple but powerful mind-mapping software for GNOME https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216363 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 20 09:22:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 04:22:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216363] Review Request: labyrinth - Simple but powerful mind-mapping software for GNOME In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611200922.kAK9MDk7002720@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: labyrinth - Simple but powerful mind-mapping software for GNOME https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216363 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-11-20 04:22 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and RPMS. + source files match upstream. d06a89239d53ae31846344c18b0df731 labyrinth-0.3.tar.bz2 + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. License text included in package. + %doc is small; no -doc subpackage required. + %doc does not affect runtime. + COPYING included in %doc. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage exists + Used gtk-update-icon-cache correctly + no .la files. + translations are available + Dose owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + Desktop file installed succesfully + Desktop file is handled correclty in SPEC file. + GUI app + Followed python packaging guidelines. Not yet approved this package as i would like to know why messages in above comment occured in build.log -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 20 13:04:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 08:04:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216300] Review Request: chemtool - A program for 2D drawing organic molecules In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611201304.kAKD4AfI019905@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: chemtool - A program for 2D drawing organic molecules https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216300 ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2006-11-20 08:04 EST ------- http://rpm.greysector.net/extras/chemtool.spec http://rpm.greysector.net/extras/chemtool-1.6.9-4.src.rpm Builds both with mock and with plain rpmbuild. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 20 14:41:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 09:41:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 210553] Review Request: xerces-c - Validating XML Parser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611201441.kAKEfxr9027844@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xerces-c - Validating XML Parser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210553 ------- Additional Comments From gauret at free.fr 2006-11-20 09:41 EST ------- It looks like you forgot to add the samples to the doc subpackage (at least in release 3) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 20 15:11:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 10:11:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215564] Review Request: bdock - Beryl project's replacement windowmaker dock In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611201511.kAKFB4EV031159@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bdock - Beryl project's replacement windowmaker dock https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215564 ------- Additional Comments From jwilson at redhat.com 2006-11-20 10:11 EST ------- Hrm, haven't actually run this code, just packaged it on request... In beryl svn trunk, the pixmaps Makefile has been converted to install in /usr/share/bock instead of /usr/share/pixmaps, so I've patched accordingly: http://wilsonet.com/packages/beryl/bdock-0.1.2-4.fc6.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 20 15:35:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 10:35:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 190213] Review Request: gq - Graphical LDAP directory browser and editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611201535.kAKFZ7aw000706@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gq - Graphical LDAP directory browser and editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190213 ------- Additional Comments From terjeros at phys.ntnu.no 2006-11-20 10:35 EST ------- > You should change it to Patch0: anyway, since it's the first patch. Same for > Source: and Source01:, should be Source0: and Source1: instead. Fixed. > FAIL - package doesn't build in mock, an error occurs while building the locales: > You need to BuildRequire gettext to provide msgfmt. Fixed. > FIX - Remove the line about desktop-file-utils from changelog entry of 1.2.1-3. > The line is wrong, desktop-file-utils is still included in your spec and this is > correct. Simply drop that line. Fixed. > FIX - Although the package builds in mock you should add a buildrequirement on > libgcrypt-devel (configure checks for /usr/bin/libgcrypt-config) Fixed. > MINOR - After you have removed useless macros you can also replace "%{__cp} -p" > with a simple "cp" (when copying LINGUAS) Fixed. > MINOR - IMHO %post and %postun should not be after the %files section Fixed. > MINOR - You can make %post and %post un a little smarter > > > %post -p update-mime-database %{_datadir}/mime &> /dev/null || : > > > > %postun -p update-mime-database %{_datadir}/mime &> /dev/null || : > > This has the advantage the rpm will automagically care for the requirement on > update-mime-database/shared-mime-info I am able to don't get this to work, should it? New files: SPEC: http://www.pvv.org/~terjeros/rpms/gq/gq.spec SRPMS: http://www.pvv.org/~terjeros/rpms/gq/gq-1.2.2-2.fc6.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 20 15:42:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 10:42:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216363] Review Request: labyrinth - Simple but powerful mind-mapping software for GNOME In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611201542.kAKFge78001404@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: labyrinth - Simple but powerful mind-mapping software for GNOME https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216363 ------- Additional Comments From peter at thecodergeek.com 2006-11-20 10:42 EST ------- Parag: The messages in the build.log are there because the Makefile in data/ contains the following block: > if test -z "$(DESTDIR)"; then \ > echo "Updating Gtk icon cache."; \ > $(gtk_update_icon_cache); \ > else \ > echo "*** Icon cache not updated. After install, run this:"; \ > echo "*** $(gtk_update_icon_cache)"; \ > fi What this does is test that DESTDIR is empty (the default installation directory would then be used) and run gtk-update-icon-cache only if so. However, we need the files to be installed into the build root to be grabbed by rpmbuild rather than installed to the system directory structure, thus are required to use DESTDIR=%{buildroot} in the make call. If you'd like, I could patch this out of the Makefile and not show it; but I believe it is entirely harmless and feel that such a patch would serve no significant benefit. Thanks for your time and review! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 20 15:55:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 10:55:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215659] Review Request: python-daap - A DAAP client implemented in Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611201555.kAKFtsFO002801@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-daap - A DAAP client implemented in Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215659 ------- Additional Comments From Jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2006-11-20 10:55 EST ------- That my be, but unfortunately I can't get this itshell programm talk on the homepage of the project. do you know how I can get it to test your package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 20 16:05:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 11:05:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216300] Review Request: chemtool - A program for 2D drawing organic molecules In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611201605.kAKG54QV003966@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: chemtool - A program for 2D drawing organic molecules https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216300 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-11-20 11:05 EST ------- Okay, this time both mockbuild and rpmbuild are okay. Then doing the full review. 1. From http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines : * Licensing - Well, it seems that this package is licensed under GPL according to several source codes, however, many source codes have no licensing terms. Would you ask upstream to clarify the license (or include GPL document to source tarball)? (currently not a blocker). 2. From http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets : * desktop-database - fedora-chemtool.desktop has mimetype keys, ------------------------------------------- MimeType=application/x-chemtool;Application ------------------------------------------- which requires update-desktop-database. 3. From http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines : (= okay) 4. Other things I have noticed: - %doc I think %doc examples/ (i.e. include 'example' directory itself) is better than %doc examples/* . -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 20 16:26:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 11:26:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215564] Review Request: bdock - Beryl project's replacement windowmaker dock In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611201626.kAKGQifa005920@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bdock - Beryl project's replacement windowmaker dock https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215564 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-11-20 11:26 EST ------- Okay. ---------------------------------------------- This package (bdock) is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 20 16:30:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 11:30:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 210424] Review Request: fail2ban - scan log files and ban IPs with too many password failures In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611201630.kAKGU0xq006401@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fail2ban - scan log files and ban IPs with too many password failures https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210424 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-11-20 11:29 EST ------- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 20 16:44:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 11:44:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215258] Review Request: clucene - A C++ port of Lucene In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611201644.kAKGiDBD008304@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clucene - A C++ port of Lucene https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215258 ------- Additional Comments From Jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2006-11-20 11:44 EST ------- Good: + Rpmlint is quite on source rpm. + Local build works fine. * Rpmlint is quited on the binary rpms. * Local install and uninstall works fine. * Tar ball matches with the upstream version. * build in mock works fine. Bad: - Why does the package the file APACHE.license and COPYING. The Lincennse tag says the LGPL as the license for the package. A clarification may be nice. - Try to run ./cl_test in the test directory in the check stanza. I have try myself and was wondering why cl_test was not generate. Please forward this to the upsteam. - Perhaps the devel rpm should contains some documentation for developers. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 20 16:53:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 11:53:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216363] Review Request: labyrinth - Simple but powerful mind-mapping software for GNOME In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611201653.kAKGr5hk009465@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: labyrinth - Simple but powerful mind-mapping software for GNOME https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216363 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-11-20 11:53 EST ------- Thanks. Yes then its harmless. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 20 16:55:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 11:55:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216363] Review Request: labyrinth - Simple but powerful mind-mapping software for GNOME In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611201655.kAKGtwMm009763@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: labyrinth - Simple but powerful mind-mapping software for GNOME https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216363 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-11-20 11:55 EST ------- Don't Forget to CLOSE this bug as NEXTRELEASE when you finish building this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 20 17:14:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 12:14:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 190213] Review Request: gq - Graphical LDAP directory browser and editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611201714.kAKHEGRC012197@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gq - Graphical LDAP directory browser and editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190213 fedora at christoph-wickert.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778, 177841 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From fedora at christoph-wickert.de 2006-11-20 12:14 EST ------- (In reply to comment #20) > > update-mime-database/shared-mime-info > > I am able to don't get this to work, should it? erm, no sorry, this was too much for rpm. Only takes one agrument and needs an absolute path. Doesn't really matter. > New files: > SPEC: http://www.pvv.org/~terjeros/rpms/gq/gq.spec > SRPMS: http://www.pvv.org/~terjeros/rpms/gq/gq-1.2.2-2.fc6.src.rpm The new package 998cd6dc0290925aef60d1786f96978f gq-1.2.2-2.fc6.src.rpm - builds in mock - is fine for rpmlint - and fixes all issuse mentioned in comment #18 This package is APPROVED One last thing I'd like to mention: I would remove the lines about desktop-file-utils from the changelog without further notice. They are confusing people. Although a detailed changelog in general is a good thing, your changelogs tend to be a little to elaborate. Some changes could easily be summarized as "clean up specfile" or something like that. I see you already are sponsored by Ed Hill, so I remove the Bug #177841 Tracker. Do you have any other pending reviews or need further help? Please keep in mind that FE CVS is currently broken, so you can't import your package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 20 17:34:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 12:34:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215659] Review Request: python-daap - A DAAP client implemented in Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611201734.kAKHYgqS014222@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-daap - A DAAP client implemented in Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215659 ------- Additional Comments From jeff at ocjtech.us 2006-11-20 12:34 EST ------- I know that the latest versions of Elisa use PythonDaap, unfortunately Elisa has a number of dependencies that aren't in Fedora yet. The main one is python-twisted-core - it's been reviewed and accepted but it hasn't been built and pushed out yet. http://www.fluendo.com/elisa/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 20 18:00:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 13:00:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216282] Review Request: mirage - A fast and simple image viewer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611201800.kAKI04QM016537@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mirage - A fast and simple image viewer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216282 sundaram at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |sundaram at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From sundaram at redhat.com 2006-11-20 12:59 EST ------- I tried building and running the SRPM package and I get the following traceback. mirage Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/bin/mirage", line 29, in ? app = mirage.Base() File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/mirage.py", line 270, in __init__ pixbuf = gtk.gdk.pixbuf_new_from_file(leave_fullscreen_icon_path) gobject.GError: Failed to open file '': No such file or directory -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 20 18:10:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 13:10:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215659] Review Request: python-daap - A DAAP client implemented in Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611201810.kAKIAmEV017405@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-daap - A DAAP client implemented in Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215659 ------- Additional Comments From jeff at ocjtech.us 2006-11-20 13:10 EST ------- I was able to get itshell.py working, it's a little non-intuitive... First, you need to set up a DAAP server. I used Rhythmbox running on another PC, but iTunes should work... There are probably other music players out there that can be DAAP servers... $ python itshell.py The python/daap interactive shell. Type 'help' for help. (no server): connect 10.0.0.1 Connecting to '10.0.0.1':3689 2006-11-20 12:08:30,358 DEBUG getting /content-codes 2006-11-20 12:08:30,408 DEBUG getting /server-info 2006-11-20 12:08:30,411 DEBUG getting /login 2006-11-20 12:08:30,412 DEBUG Logged in as session -1546218061 2006-11-20 12:08:30,413 DEBUG getting /databases?session-id=-1546218061 2006-11-20 12:08:30,415 DEBUG getting /databases?session-id=-1546218061 using database 'u"Jeff's Music"' 2006-11-20 12:08:30,416 DEBUG getting /databases/1/items?session-id=-1546218061&meta=dmap.itemid,dmap.itemname,daap.songalbum,daap.songartist,daap.songformat,daap.songtime Got 52 tracks (10.0.0.1:3689): search elvis 1 tracks found. 45: u'Elvis Presley' - u'The Time-Life Treasury of Christmas (disc 1)' - u'Here Comes Santa Claus' (10.0.0.1:3689): download 45 claus.flac 2006-11-20 12:09:09,385 DEBUG saving to 'claus.flac' 2006-11-20 12:09:09,386 DEBUG getting /databases/1/items/45.flac?session-id=-1546218061 2006-11-20 12:09:10,422 DEBUG Done (10.0.0.1:3689): exit bye. 2006-11-20 12:09:27,502 DEBUG getting /logout?session-id=-1546218061 2006-11-20 12:09:27,504 DEBUG DAAPSession: expired session id -1546218061 $ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 20 18:24:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 13:24:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216322] Review Request: tailor - VCS repository conversion tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611201824.kAKIOsb8018388@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tailor - VCS repository conversion tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216322 ------- Additional Comments From Jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2006-11-20 13:24 EST ------- God: + Local build works fine. + Source matches with upstream. * Mock build works fine. Bad: - Rpmlint shows the following waring on the source package: W: tailor no-%build-section - python-vcpx doesn't contains any documentation - Local test run fails with: Script started on Mo 20 Nov 2006 19:23:47 CET Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/bin/tailor", line 24, in ? from vcpx.tests import main ImportError: No module named tests Script done on Mo 20 Nov 2006 19:23:47 CET -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 20 18:25:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 13:25:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216322] Review Request: tailor - VCS repository conversion tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611201825.kAKIPq50018476@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tailor - VCS repository conversion tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216322 Jochen at herr-schmitt.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |Jochen at herr-schmitt.de OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 20 19:01:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 14:01:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 211319] Review Request: andutteye-client - Andutteye Software Suite Monitoring agent In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611201901.kAKJ1hOG022809@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: andutteye-client - Andutteye Software Suite Monitoring agent https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211319 ------- Additional Comments From andreas.utterberg at thundera.se 2006-11-20 14:01 EST ------- Thanx for the good input Francois. I have corrected the package after your input above. The logrotate program works, aswell as the installation. Still problem with adding /sbin to the users PATH. I tried your workaround Francois but it didnt work. It seemed that the user didnt get any .bash_profile at all. Also as you mention above, maybe i shall remove the default add of the service? Let me know if you find something else to correct. http://www.andutteye.com/download/andutteye-client.spec http://www.andutteye.com/download/andutteye-client-2.3-11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 20 19:21:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 14:21:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215258] Review Request: clucene - A C++ port of Lucene In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611201921.kAKJL4o3024985@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clucene - A C++ port of Lucene https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215258 ------- Additional Comments From dakingun at gmail.com 2006-11-20 14:20 EST ------- > Bad: > - Why does the package the file APACHE.license and COPYING. The Lincennse tag > says the LGPL as the license for the package. A clarification may be nice. I guess I can leave out packaging the APACHE.license file since we've already chosen LGPL, the COPYING file provides the clarification you were asking for. Basically that the software includes both APACHE and LGPL licenses and one can choose any of the 2, but the LGPL is preferred and recommended. > - Try to run ./cl_test in the test directory in the check stanza. I have try > myself and was wondering why cl_test was not generate. Please forward this to > the upsteam. I think it's intentional not to build the test stuff by default (IMHO, neither should we do it for Fedora packaging effort). People who are interested in running the test can grab the source (src rpm) and 'make check' in the test directory. > - Perhaps the devel rpm should contains some documentation for developers. > ok, i've packaged those that comes with the software. Spec URL: ftp://czar.eas.yorku.ca/pub/clucene/clucene.spec SRPM URL: ftp://czar.eas.yorku.ca/pub/clucene/clucene-0.9.15-3.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 20 19:37:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 14:37:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 205755] Review Request: elsa - manages group of processes and allows accounting In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611201937.kAKJba6K026981@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: elsa - manages group of processes and allows accounting https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205755 ------- Additional Comments From konradr at redhat.com 2006-11-20 14:37 EST ------- Good: - MD5 sums match ( from bullopensource.org and from SF), - Builds on all platforms (brew using FC6), - Good usage of version and release tags, - License (COPYING) is the same in source code, - No compile warnings, - No rpmlint errors and warnings, - Documentation include. - Clear english in spec file. - Consistent use of macros. Needs work: - NEWS file, add a reference about release 1.4 and being submitted for FC6 - Take out from the TODO, the reference to webmin since that is a part of another package (from reading the ChangeLog) Do these and it is ready. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 20 19:38:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 14:38:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 193059] Review Request: ibmasm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611201938.kAKJceYs027094@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ibmasm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193059 ------- Additional Comments From konradr at redhat.com 2006-11-20 14:38 EST ------- Paul, Thank you for your review. I will start looking at the need work items and try to get them done as soon as holiday schedule permits. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 20 20:01:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 15:01:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 210007] Review Request: - In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611202001.kAKK1gDl030866@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210007 ------- Additional Comments From konradr at redhat.com 2006-11-20 15:01 EST ------- * I think the need to have in the spec file the build against different kernels and releases is not needed. The reason for this is that when I build the package for FC6, I end up with: [konrad at dhcp83-148 task_394874]$ ls libtune-0.10-3.i386.rpm tunables-data-2.6.16-0.10-3.ppc.rpm libtune-0.10-3.ia64.rpm tunables-data-2.6.16-0.10-3.s390.rpm libtune-0.10-3.ppc64.rpm tunables-data-2.6.16-0.10-3.s390x.rpm libtune-0.10-3.ppc.rpm tunables-data-2.6.16-0.10-3.x86_64.rpm libtune-0.10-3.s390.rpm tunables-data-2.6.18-0.10-3.i386.rpm libtune-0.10-3.s390x.rpm tunables-data-2.6.18-0.10-3.ia64.rpm libtune-0.10-3.src.rpm tunables-data-2.6.18-0.10-3.ppc64.rpm libtune-0.10-3.x86_64.rpm tunables-data-2.6.18-0.10-3.ppc.rpm libtune-debuginfo-0.10-3.i386.rpm tunables-data-2.6.18-0.10-3.s390.rpm libtune-debuginfo-0.10-3.ia64.rpm tunables-data-2.6.18-0.10-3.s390x.rpm libtune-debuginfo-0.10-3.ppc64.rpm tunables-data-2.6.18-0.10-3.x86_64.rpm libtune-debuginfo-0.10-3.ppc.rpm tunables-data-FC5-2.6.16-0.10-3.i386.rpm libtune-debuginfo-0.10-3.s390.rpm tunables-data-FC5-2.6.16-0.10-3.ia64.rpm libtune-debuginfo-0.10-3.s390x.rpm tunables-data-FC5-2.6.16-0.10-3.ppc64.rpm libtune-debuginfo-0.10-3.x86_64.rpm tunables-data-FC5-2.6.16-0.10-3.ppc.rpm libtune-devel-0.10-3.i386.rpm tunables-data-FC5-2.6.16-0.10-3.s390.rpm libtune-devel-0.10-3.ia64.rpm tunables-data-FC5-2.6.16-0.10-3.s390x.rpm libtune-devel-0.10-3.ppc64.rpm tunables-data-FC5-2.6.16-0.10-3.x86_64.rpm libtune-devel-0.10-3.ppc.rpm tunables-data-FC6-2.6.18-0.10-3.i386.rpm libtune-devel-0.10-3.s390.rpm tunables-data-FC6-2.6.18-0.10-3.ia64.rpm libtune-devel-0.10-3.s390x.rpm tunables-data-FC6-2.6.18-0.10-3.ppc64.rpm libtune-devel-0.10-3.x86_64.rpm tunables-data-FC6-2.6.18-0.10-3.ppc.rpm logs tunables-data-FC6-2.6.18-0.10-3.s390.rpm tunables-data-2.6.16-0.10-3.i386.rpm tunables-data-FC6-2.6.18-0.10-3.s390x.rpm tunables-data-2.6.16-0.10-3.ia64.rpm tunables-data-FC6-2.6.18-0.10-3.x86_64.rpm tunables-data-2.6.16-0.10-3.ppc64.rpm It is not neccessary to build all those extra tunables-data for different kernels and releases when I am building just against FC6. The end result should be just one "tunables-data-.fc6." for each platform. Otherwise the CD with FC6 ends up with RPMs for FC5, which is clearly not needed. I think it would be better to remove the big loop, use the %dist as part of the devel package. The kernel number component should be automaticly extracted - this should be possible if you make the BuildReq depend on kernel-devel. Perhaps it is not even neccesary to put the kernel version in the name of the RPM, but just have it as a dependency? That would also remove lots hard-coded 2.6.16/2.6.18/FC5/FC6 strings used in the names. * The Release tag in the spec file. It should have "%{dist}" post-fix. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 20 20:42:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 15:42:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216322] Review Request: tailor - VCS repository conversion tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611202042.kAKKgGkQ004749@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tailor - VCS repository conversion tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216322 ------- Additional Comments From dan at danny.cz 2006-11-20 15:42 EST ------- - (In reply to comment #1) > Bad: > - Rpmlint shows the following waring on the source package: > W: tailor no-%build-section it used to be possible to omit the build section when there was nothing to do (and my version of rpmlint is silent :-) ) > - python-vcpx doesn't contains any documentation yes, there are really no docs for the subpackage > - Local test run fails with: > Script started on Mo 20 Nov 2006 19:23:47 CET > Traceback (most recent call last): > File "/usr/bin/tailor", line 24, in ? > from vcpx.tests import main > ImportError: No module named tests > > Script done on Mo 20 Nov 2006 19:23:47 CET Please, can you tell me, what and how are you trying to run? The included tests during or after the build? And because there is no COPYING file included, I will ask the upstream to include it in the next versions. The license (GPL) is explicitly mentioned in the README. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 20 21:24:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 16:24:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 196401] Review Request: mozldap In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611202124.kAKLOLBu011189@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mozldap Alias: mozldap https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196401 ------- Additional Comments From jwilson at redhat.com 2006-11-20 16:24 EST ------- Eep, sorry for the delay, this has been sitting in my queue for a while now... Anyhow, just did a run-through of the mozlap6 package. We're in much better shape with this version! The only remaining issue I see at the moment is that rpmlint is still complaining about invalid sonames: $ rpmlint /build/RPMS/x86_64/mozldap6-6.0.0-1.fc6.x86_64.rpm E: mozldap6 invalid-soname /usr/lib64/libprldap60.so.6.0.0 libprldap60.so E: mozldap6 invalid-soname /usr/lib64/libssldap60.so.6.0.0 libssldap60.so E: mozldap6 invalid-soname /usr/lib64/libldap60.so.6.0.0 libldap60.so -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 20 21:35:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 16:35:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 208034] Review Request: HippoDraw - Interactive and Python scriptable data analysis application In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611202135.kAKLZJl8013480@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: HippoDraw - Interactive and Python scriptable data analysis application https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208034 orion at cora.nwra.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |orion at cora.nwra.com ------- Additional Comments From orion at cora.nwra.com 2006-11-20 16:35 EST ------- x86_64 issues: > checking for /usr/lib/libcfitsio.so... no > configure: WARNING: cfitsio not found Looks for libcfitsio.so in /usr/lib on x86_64. Tried --with-cfitsio-lib=%{_libdir}, but that check for /usr/lib/licfitsio.so persists and overrides the earlier check. Maybe remove the second check from configure? Not sure if this is related, but the build fails with: g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I.. -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64 -mtune=generic -Wall -ansi -MT HiNTupleXML.lo -MD -MP -MF .deps/HiNTupleXML.Tpo -c HiNTupleXML.cxx -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/HiNTupleXML.o g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I.. -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64 -mtune=generic -Wall -ansi -MT MapMatrixProjectorXML.lo -MD -MP -MF .deps/MapMatrixProjectorXML.Tpo -c MapMatrixProjectorXML.cxx -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/MapMatrixProjectorXML.o HiNTupleXML.cxx: In member function 'const hippodraw::DataSource* hippodraw::HiNTupleXML::getObject(std::string) const': HiNTupleXML.cxx:116: error: 'DataSourceException' was not declared in this scope make[2]: *** [HiNTupleXML.lo] Error 1 make[2]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... make[2]: Leaving directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/HippoDraw-1.18.8/xml' -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 20 21:51:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 16:51:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215571] Review Request: heliodor - Beryl window decorator with Metacity theme support In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611202151.kAKLpnm5017004@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: heliodor - Beryl window decorator with Metacity theme support https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215571 ------- Additional Comments From jwilson at redhat.com 2006-11-20 16:51 EST ------- Thanks much! I've removed the Reqs: for the build I'll import, and the directory ownership problem has been filed against metacity as bug 216514. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 20 21:52:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 16:52:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216517] New: Review Request: gnome-valgrind-session - Run an entire GNOME session under valgrind Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216517 Summary: Review Request: gnome-valgrind-session - Run an entire GNOME session under valgrind Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: dmalcolm at redhat.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: https://testing.108.redhat.com/source/browse/*checkout*/testing/trunk/incubator/gnome-valgrind-session/gnome-valgrind-session.spec?rev=292 SRPM URL: https://testing.108.redhat.com/files/documents/78/162/gnome-valgrind-session-1.0-1.src.rpm Description: This package adds two options to gdm's Session menu to run an entire GNOME session under valgrind, and gather the results to report files in your home directory names valgrind-session.0, valgrind-session.1, etc. The two sessions filter the output, checking either for errors, or for memory leaks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 20 22:01:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 17:01:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 196401] Review Request: mozldap In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611202201.kAKM1EsN019165@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mozldap Alias: mozldap https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196401 ------- Additional Comments From rmeggins at redhat.com 2006-11-20 17:01 EST ------- I'm not sure what it is complaining about. Does it not like the fact that the soname is libname60.so, and not libname-6.so or libname.so.6? The name libldap60.so is a convention for historical purposes, and also serves to distinguish the library name from the openldap libldap-2.3.so etc. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 20 22:04:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 17:04:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216517] Review Request: gnome-valgrind-session - Run an entire GNOME session under valgrind In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611202204.kAKM4Faq019806@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-valgrind-session - Run an entire GNOME session under valgrind https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216517 ------- Additional Comments From dmalcolm at redhat.com 2006-11-20 17:04 EST ------- 1.0-2: Reworded the description: https://testing.108.redhat.com/source/browse/testing/trunk/incubator/gnome-valgrind-session/gnome-valgrind-session.spec?rev=293&view=markup -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 20 22:05:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 17:05:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216284] Review Request: dd2 - Dodgin' Diamond 2 - Shoot'em up arcade game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611202205.kAKM5Tdr020108@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dd2 - Dodgin' Diamond 2 - Shoot'em up arcade game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216284 wart at kobold.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |wart at kobold.org OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 20 22:07:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 17:07:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 196401] Review Request: mozldap In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611202207.kAKM7w0A020748@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mozldap Alias: mozldap https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196401 ------- Additional Comments From jwilson at redhat.com 2006-11-20 17:07 EST ------- No, it doesn't like that the soname is libname60.so.6.0.0 instead of just libname60.so, a side-effect of it being compiled at libname60.so, then moved. Check out the last bit of comment #8. I believe libname60.so.6.0.0 needs to be encoded into the library at compile-time somehow. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 20 22:09:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 17:09:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216519] New: Review Request: sdparm - List or change SCSI disk parameters Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216519 Summary: Review Request: sdparm - List or change SCSI disk parameters Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: terjeros at phys.ntnu.no QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.pvv.ntnu.no/~terjeros/rpms/sdparm/sdparm.spec SRPM URL: http://www.pvv.ntnu.no/~terjeros/rpms/sdparm/sdparm-1.00-2.fc6.src.rpm Description: SCSI disk parameters are held in mode pages. This utility lists or changes those parameters. Other SCSI devices (or devices that use the SCSI command set) such as CD/DVD and tape drives may also find parts of sdparm useful. Requires the linux kernel 2.4 series or later. In the 2.6 series any device node the understands a SCSI command set may be used (e.g. /dev/sda). In the 2.4 series SCSI device node may be used. Fetches Vital Product Data pages. Can send commands to start or stop the media and load or unload removable media. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 20 22:14:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 17:14:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 190213] Review Request: gq - Graphical LDAP directory browser and editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611202214.kAKMED5n022375@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gq - Graphical LDAP directory browser and editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190213 ------- Additional Comments From terjeros at phys.ntnu.no 2006-11-20 17:14 EST ------- > This package is APPROVED Thanks. > Do you have any other pending reviews or need further help? Can you please take a look at #216519 (just submitted). > Please keep in mind that FE CVS is currently broken, so you can't import your > package. Yeah, so I understand. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 20 22:20:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 17:20:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216284] Review Request: dd2 - Dodgin' Diamond 2 - Shoot'em up arcade game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611202220.kAKMKq0X023561@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dd2 - Dodgin' Diamond 2 - Shoot'em up arcade game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216284 wart at kobold.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2006-11-20 17:20 EST ------- GOOD ==== * rpmlint warns: E: dd2 non-standard-executable-perm /usr/bin/dd2 02755 This is acceptible for setgid games. * Package and spec named appropriately * GPL license ok, license file included * spec file legible and in Am. English * Source matches upstream: fe713b8393e05ee6417108db968f34ac dd2-0.2.1.tar.gz * Package builds and compiles on (FC5, FC6, devel) x (i386, x86_64) * Package contents look sane * No excessive BR: * No locales * No shared libs * Not relocatable * Does not own directories that it should not * Owns all directories that it creates * No need for a -devel or -doc subpackage * File permissions ok * Package provides and requires lists are sane * Application runs on FC6-x86_64 * Scriptlets look ok I just ran into the fullscreen problem with another game, so I expect that it really is a bug in the binary video driver. I'll generate a backtrace and post it here for your reference, as well as send it upstream to nvidia so that it can (hopefully) get fixed in a later release. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 20 22:30:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 17:30:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216519] Review Request: sdparm - List or change SCSI disk parameters In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611202230.kAKMUZVt024792@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sdparm - List or change SCSI disk parameters https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216519 peter at thecodergeek.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |peter at thecodergeek.com ------- Additional Comments From peter at thecodergeek.com 2006-11-20 17:30 EST ------- As I recall, this is also useful for SATA devices. If it's alright with you, I think adding that to the %description and Summary ("List or change SCSI/SATA disk parameters") would be beneficial for those wanting to find this through a search or similar. Also, your %build section appears to be missing a make call: > make %{?_smp_mflags} Lastly, why is there a need for the checking of %buildroot in %clean/%install? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 20 22:50:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 17:50:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216526] New: Review Request: perl-String-Approx Perl extension for approximate matching (fuzzy matching) Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216526 Summary: Review Request: perl-String-Approx Perl extension for approximate matching (fuzzy matching) Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All URL: http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: orion at cora.nwra.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec Name or Url: http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/perl-String-Approx.spec SRPM Name or Url: http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/perl-String-Approx-3.26-1.fc6.src.rpm Description: String::Approx lets you match and substitute strings approximately. With this you can emulate errors: typing errorrs, speling errors, closely related vocabularies (colour color), genetic mutations (GAG ACT), abbreviations (McScot, MacScot). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 20 22:57:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 17:57:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216519] Review Request: sdparm - List or change SCSI disk parameters In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611202257.kAKMvBla027287@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sdparm - List or change SCSI disk parameters https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216519 ------- Additional Comments From terjeros at phys.ntnu.no 2006-11-20 17:57 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > As I recall, this is also useful for SATA devices. If it's alright with you, I > think adding that to the %description and Summary ("List or change SCSI/SATA > disk parameters") would be beneficial for those wanting to find this through a > search or similar. Fixed, better now? > Also, your %build section appears to be missing a make call: > > make %{?_smp_mflags} Indeed! > Lastly, why is there a need for the checking of %buildroot in %clean/%install? A upstream thingie, removed. New files: SPEC: http://www.pvv.ntnu.no/~terjeros/rpms/sdparm/sdparm.spec SRPMS: http://www.pvv.ntnu.no/~terjeros/rpms/sdparm/sdparm-1.00-3.fc6.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 20 22:59:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 17:59:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216534] New: Review Request: gocr - GNU Optical Character Recognition program Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216534 Summary: Review Request: gocr - GNU Optical Character Recognition program Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All URL: http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: orion at cora.nwra.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec Name or Url: http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/gocr.spec SRPM Name or Url: http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/gocr-0.41-1.fc6.src.rpm Description: GOCR is an OCR (Optical Character Recognition) program, developed under the GNU Public License. It converts scanned images of text back to text files. Joerg Schulenburg started the program, and now leads a team of developers. GOCR can be used with different front-ends, which makes it very easy to port to different OSes and architectures. It can open many different image formats, and its quality have been improving in a daily basis. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 20 23:05:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 18:05:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216535] New: Review Request: mp3gain - Lossless MP3 volume adjustment tool Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216535 Summary: Review Request: mp3gain - Lossless MP3 volume adjustment tool Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: bdpepple at ameritech.net QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://piedmont.homelinux.org/fedora/mp3gain/mp3gain.spec SRPM URL: http://piedmont.homelinux.org/fedora/mp3gain/mp3gain-1.4.6-1.src.rpm Description: MP3Gain analyzes and adjusts mp3 files so that they have the same volume. It does not just do peak normalization, as many normalizers do. Instead, it does some statistical analysis to determine how loud the file actually sounds to the human ear. Also, the changes MP3Gain makes are completely lossless. There is no quality lost in the change because the program adjusts the mp3 file directly, without decoding and re-encoding. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 20 23:08:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 18:08:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216519] Review Request: sdparm - List or change SCSI disk parameters In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611202308.kAKN8Yns028332@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sdparm - List or change SCSI disk parameters https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216519 ------- Additional Comments From peter at thecodergeek.com 2006-11-20 18:08 EST ------- Much better. Thanks. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 20 23:16:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 18:16:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216536] New: Review Request: FuzzyOcr - Checks for specific keywords in image attachments, using gocr Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216536 Summary: Review Request: FuzzyOcr - Checks for specific keywords in image attachments, using gocr Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All URL: http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: orion at cora.nwra.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec Name or Url: http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/FuzzyOcr.spec SRPM Name or Url: http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/ Description: FuzzyOcr is a plugin for SpamAssassin written by Christian Holler and Jorge Valdes. It is based on the OcrPlugin written by Maarten de Boer, but has been heavily modified and improved to the point that it bears little resemblance today. Perhaps this should be called spamassassin-FuzzyOcr? Installed somewhere else? Seems to be the first separately packaged SpamAssassin module that I can see. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 20 23:16:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 18:16:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216526] Review Request: perl-String-Approx Perl extension for approximate matching (fuzzy matching) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611202316.kAKNGQst028746@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-String-Approx Perl extension for approximate matching (fuzzy matching) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216526 orion at cora.nwra.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |216536 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 20 23:16:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 18:16:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216534] Review Request: gocr - GNU Optical Character Recognition program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611202316.kAKNGcQQ028753@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gocr - GNU Optical Character Recognition program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216534 orion at cora.nwra.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |216536 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 20 23:33:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 18:33:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216282] Review Request: mirage - A fast and simple image viewer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611202333.kAKNXOXd029675@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mirage - A fast and simple image viewer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216282 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-11-20 18:33 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > I tried building and running the SRPM package and I get the following traceback. I cannot figure out what is the problem only from your information. Currently I can only say 'this program works for me'...... Would you tell me more details so that I can reproduce your situation? By the way, are 3 image files correctly installed under /usr/share/mirage? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 20 23:49:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 18:49:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216300] Review Request: chemtool - A program for 2D drawing organic molecules In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611202349.kAKNnigW030701@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: chemtool - A program for 2D drawing organic molecules https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216300 ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2006-11-20 18:49 EST ------- (In reply to comment #11) > Okay, this time both mockbuild and rpmbuild are okay. > Then doing the full review. > > 1. From http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines : > > * Licensing > - Well, it seems that this package is licensed under GPL according > to several source codes, however, many source codes have no > licensing terms. Would you ask upstream to clarify the license > (or include GPL document to source tarball)? (currently not a > blocker). Mail sent. > 2. From http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets : > * desktop-database > - fedora-chemtool.desktop has mimetype keys, > ------------------------------------------- > MimeType=application/x-chemtool;Application > ------------------------------------------- > which requires update-desktop-database. Done. > 4. Other things I have noticed: > - %doc > I think %doc examples/ (i.e. include 'example' directory itself) > is better than %doc examples/* . Done. http://rpm.greysector.net/extras/chemtool.spec http://rpm.greysector.net/extras/chemtool-1.6.9-5.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 20 23:52:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 18:52:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216282] Review Request: mirage - A fast and simple image viewer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611202352.kAKNquDl030890@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mirage - A fast and simple image viewer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216282 ------- Additional Comments From sundaram at redhat.com 2006-11-20 18:52 EST ------- I used rpmbuild to build the srpm at http://www.ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~mtasaka/dist/extras/development/SRPMS/mirage-0.8.1-1.src.rpm. /usr/share/mirage is empty. Is there any additional details you would like to know? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 21 00:06:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 19:06:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216544] New: Review Request: libdvdread - Simple foundation for reading DVD video disks Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216544 Summary: Review Request: libdvdread - Simple foundation for reading DVD video disks Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rpm at greysector.net QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://rpm.greysector.net/extras/libdvdread.spec SRPM URL: http://rpm.greysector.net/extras/libdvdread-0.9.7-1.src.rpm Description: libdvdread provides a simple foundation for reading DVD video disks. It provides the functionality that is required to access many DVDs. Note: it does not support encrypted DVDs (i.e. doesn't contain libdvdcss). According to a discussion with Tom Callaway, it should be acceptable in Extras. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 21 00:07:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 19:07:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216282] Review Request: mirage - A fast and simple image viewer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611210007.kAL071xO032114@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mirage - A fast and simple image viewer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216282 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-11-20 19:07 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=141711) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=141711&action=view) rpmbuild build log of mirage-0.8.1-1 by me (In reply to comment #7) > /usr/share/mirage is empty. Is there any additional details you would like to know? This is a problem. Maybe I have to add some BRs (however mockbuild shows no problem for me....) Please attach your build log, which may be helpful. I attach my build log FYI. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 21 00:26:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 19:26:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214024] Review Request: perl-Net-DBus - Net::DBus Perl module In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611210026.kAL0Qn3d001048@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-DBus - Net::DBus Perl module https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214024 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-11-20 19:26 EST ------- Note that a test update which rebases FC6 to dbus 1.0.1 has just been released, so I expect rawhide brokenness will become a much more urgent issue. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 21 01:07:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 20:07:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216535] Review Request: mp3gain - Lossless MP3 volume adjustment tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611210107.kAL17UIR003578@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mp3gain - Lossless MP3 volume adjustment tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216535 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-11-20 20:07 EST ------- Trying to fetch Spec URL: Firefox can't establish a connection to the server at piedmont.homelinux.org. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 21 01:13:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 20:13:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216535] Review Request: mp3gain - Lossless MP3 volume adjustment tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611210113.kAL1DnUD003962@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mp3gain - Lossless MP3 volume adjustment tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216535 ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at ameritech.net 2006-11-20 20:13 EST ------- Should be up right now. My router has been acting up for the last hour or so. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 21 01:23:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 20:23:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214024] Review Request: perl-Net-DBus - Net::DBus Perl module In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611210123.kAL1N9bv004928@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-DBus - Net::DBus Perl module https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214024 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-11-20 20:23 EST ------- Looks like in this case the testsuite (namely 30-server.t) is broken, rather than the module itself: http://rt.cpan.org/Public/Bug/Display.html?id=22850 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 21 01:36:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 20:36:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216354] Review Request: liquidwar - Multiplayer wargame with liquid armies In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611210136.kAL1aZta005691@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: liquidwar - Multiplayer wargame with liquid armies https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216354 wart at kobold.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |wart at kobold.org OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 21 01:41:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 20:41:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 199029] Review Request: jokosher In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611210141.kAL1fsmb005932@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jokosher https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199029 steven at silverorange.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |steven at silverorange.com ------- Additional Comments From steven at silverorange.com 2006-11-20 20:41 EST ------- 0.2 is out -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 21 01:49:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 20:49:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 199029] Review Request: jokosher In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611210149.kAL1nHoA006368@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jokosher https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199029 ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at ameritech.net 2006-11-20 20:49 EST ------- Yeah, 0.2 is out, but it depends on current gstreamer CVS, which make it's a non-starter to go into FE right now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 21 01:59:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 20:59:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216354] Review Request: liquidwar - Multiplayer wargame with liquid armies In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611210159.kAL1xL5S007122@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: liquidwar - Multiplayer wargame with liquid armies https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216354 ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2006-11-20 20:59 EST ------- GOOD ==== * Package and spec named appropriately * GPL license ok, license file included * Source matches upstream: a41473c281f214c1ac96ab50f98537c9 liquidwar-5.6.3.tar.gz * Spec file legible and in Am. English * Compiles and builds on (FC5, FC6, devel) x (i386, x86_64) * No -devel subpackage needed * Large docs are located in -doc subpackage * Not relocatable * No locales * Directory ownership ok * file permissions ok * .desktop file and icons installed correctly * No shared libraries * Application runs as expected SHOULD ====== * Consider adding the README file to %doc. It contains the address of the package's mailing list which doesn't appear elsewhere. * 'make dep' gets run as part of the build, and generates the following harmless warning: gmake[1]: Entering directory `/space/rpmbuild/BUILD/liquidwar-5.6.3/src' find: .-name: No such file or directory find: *.c: No such file or directory cc: no input files gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/space/rpmbuild/BUILD/liquidwar-5.6.3/src' It seems there is a missing space after the '.' in src/Makefile.in line 256: @find .\ -name '*.c' | \ * The man page refers the reader to "/usr/share/doc/liquidwar" for more documentation. This path should be updated to point to the files in the -doc subpackage. * The URL: tag points to a page with a better home page link: http://www.ufoot.org/liquidwar/v5 * The metaserver URL in the man page is wrong. It should be: http://www.ufoot.org/liquidwar/v5/metaserver * An init.d script for starting a liquidwar server at boot time would be nice. Perhaps if I find some extra time I'll write one for you. None of these issues are serious enough to block approval: APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 21 01:59:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 20:59:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216354] Review Request: liquidwar - Multiplayer wargame with liquid armies In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611210159.kAL1xfld007141@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: liquidwar - Multiplayer wargame with liquid armies https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216354 wart at kobold.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 21 03:56:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 22:56:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 171993] Review Request: mpich2 - An implementation of MPI In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611210356.kAL3uLCu013040@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mpich2 - An implementation of MPI https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=171993 ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2006-11-20 22:56 EST ------- Builds fine in mock devel/x86_64. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 21 04:21:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 23:21:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216282] Review Request: mirage - A fast and simple image viewer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611210421.kAL4Lfjl015698@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mirage - A fast and simple image viewer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216282 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-11-20 23:21 EST ------- Rahul, Being the reviewer of this package i had checked all things including build.log and tested application successfully by running it from console and desktop icon also. Its working fine without problem in my machine. Can you submit messages coming from following command at least rpmbuild --rebuild mirage-0.8.1-1.src.rpm ?? Also check that you have pygtk2 and gnome-python2-gconf installed on your system. Remember gnome-python2-gconf is in FC6 Updates and not in FC6 Core repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 21 04:39:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 23:39:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216535] Review Request: mp3gain - Lossless MP3 volume adjustment tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611210439.kAL4dngK017650@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mp3gain - Lossless MP3 volume adjustment tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216535 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |panemade at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-11-20 23:39 EST ------- Still problem to download SRPM -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 21 04:58:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 23:58:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216535] Review Request: mp3gain - Lossless MP3 volume adjustment tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611210458.kAL4w1eX019575@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mp3gain - Lossless MP3 volume adjustment tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216535 ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at ameritech.net 2006-11-20 23:57 EST ------- Should be alright now. (Crosses fingers, and hopes stupid router doesn't act up again) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 21 06:00:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 01:00:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216535] Review Request: mp3gain - Lossless MP3 volume adjustment tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611210600.kAL60rqK023587@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mp3gain - Lossless MP3 volume adjustment tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216535 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-11-21 01:00 EST ------- mock build is successfull but got rpmlint warning on binary rpm as W: mp3gain wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/mp3gain-1.4.6/lgpl.txt -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 21 06:12:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 01:12:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216535] Review Request: mp3gain - Lossless MP3 volume adjustment tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611210612.kAL6C2Un024390@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mp3gain - Lossless MP3 volume adjustment tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216535 ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at ameritech.net 2006-11-21 01:11 EST ------- In my opinon that error can probably be ignored. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 21 06:19:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 01:19:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216544] Review Request: libdvdread - Simple foundation for reading DVD video disks In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611210619.kAL6Jxcg024671@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libdvdread - Simple foundation for reading DVD video disks https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216544 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-11-21 01:19 EST ------- So which package currently needs this package? how can i test its working? how can i read video DVDs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 21 07:16:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 02:16:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216299] Review Request: libEMF - A library for generating Enhanced Metafiles In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611210716.kAL7GgBn026874@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libEMF - A library for generating Enhanced Metafiles https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216299 rpm at greysector.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2006-11-21 02:16 EST ------- Imported and built for devel, FC6 and FC5 branches requested. Thanks again for the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 21 07:17:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 02:17:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216300] Review Request: chemtool - A program for 2D drawing organic molecules In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611210717.kAL7H5f0026911@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: chemtool - A program for 2D drawing organic molecules https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216300 Bug 216300 depends on bug 216299, which changed state. Bug 216299 Summary: Review Request: libEMF - A library for generating Enhanced Metafiles https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216299 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 21 09:20:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 04:20:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216282] Review Request: mirage - A fast and simple image viewer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611210920.kAL9KZfR003850@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mirage - A fast and simple image viewer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216282 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-11-21 04:20 EST ------- Well, * Rebuild for FE-devel succeeded, no problem. http://buildsys.fedoraproject.org/plague-results/fedora-development-extras/mirage/ * SyncNeeded is requested for FE-6, FE-5. Parag, thank you for reviewing and approving this package!! Rahul, if your problem still reappear, please open a new bug report. Now I close this bug as CLOSED NEXTRELEASE. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 21 09:39:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 04:39:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216535] Review Request: mp3gain - Lossless MP3 volume adjustment tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611210939.kAL9d9n6005408@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mp3gain - Lossless MP3 volume adjustment tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216535 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-11-21 04:38 EST ------- Is this package acceptable legally in Fedora Extras? I have not looked into this package and the first message says 'without decoding and re-encoding', so this may be acceptable. However, according to http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Multimedia/MP3 it says that 'Fedora is unable to include support for the MP3'. So how do I think of this package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 21 09:55:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 04:55:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215165] Review Request: audacious-plugins - Plugins for the Audacious media player In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611210955.kAL9t8fn006821@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: audacious-plugins - Plugins for the Audacious media player https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215165 ------- Additional Comments From redhat-bugzilla at camperquake.de 2006-11-21 04:54 EST ------- New audacious and audacious-plugins packages at http://www.skytale.net/files/audacious/ Moves /usr/lib/audacious into audacious-plugins, and adds a patch for cdaudio. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 21 10:22:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 05:22:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216544] Review Request: libdvdread - Simple foundation for reading DVD video disks In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611211022.kALAMmHS008401@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libdvdread - Simple foundation for reading DVD video disks https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216544 lemenkov at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lemenkov at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From lemenkov at gmail.com 2006-11-21 05:22 EST ------- > Note: it does not support encrypted DVDs (i.e. doesn't contain libdvdcss). So it's completely useless. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 21 10:24:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 05:24:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215165] Review Request: audacious-plugins - Plugins for the Audacious media player In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611211024.kALAOrbw008511@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: audacious-plugins - Plugins for the Audacious media player https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215165 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-11-21 05:24 EST ------- Unable to download files -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 21 10:42:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 05:42:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216544] Review Request: libdvdread - Simple foundation for reading DVD video disks In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611211042.kALAgVoL009960@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libdvdread - Simple foundation for reading DVD video disks https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216544 ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2006-11-21 05:42 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > > Note: it does not support encrypted DVDs (i.e. doesn't contain libdvdcss). > > So it's completely useless. Not quite. You can install libdvdcss from another repository and it'll work with encrypted DVDs, too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 21 10:47:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 05:47:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216544] Review Request: libdvdread - Simple foundation for reading DVD video disks In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611211047.kALAlJ50010406@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libdvdread - Simple foundation for reading DVD video disks https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216544 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at leemhuis.info 2006-11-21 05:47 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > So it's completely useless. There is afaik software out there that can use libdvdread as provided here. Maybe that software itself is not suitable for Extras -- but even if that's really the case it's IMHO still a good idea to provide libdvdread in Extras. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 21 10:58:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 05:58:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216544] Review Request: libdvdread - Simple foundation for reading DVD video disks In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611211058.kALAw7GR011662@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libdvdread - Simple foundation for reading DVD video disks https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216544 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-11-21 05:57 EST ------- I can review this package but i need to know how can i test its working. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 21 11:03:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 06:03:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216300] Review Request: chemtool - A program for 2D drawing organic molecules In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611211103.kALB3PiW012293@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: chemtool - A program for 2D drawing organic molecules https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216300 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-11-21 06:03 EST ------- Okay. -------------------------------------------------------------- This package (chemtool) is APPROVED by me -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 21 11:11:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 06:11:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216544] Review Request: libdvdread - Simple foundation for reading DVD video disks In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611211111.kALBBq6E013062@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libdvdread - Simple foundation for reading DVD video disks https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216544 ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2006-11-21 06:11 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > So which package currently needs this package? how can i test its working? how > can i read video DVDs? gstreamer-plugins(-ugly?) can be built with libdvdread support. Also, there are examples from Debian: lsdvd, dvdbackup. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 21 11:37:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 06:37:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216300] Review Request: chemtool - A program for 2D drawing organic molecules In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611211137.kALBbGs1014370@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: chemtool - A program for 2D drawing organic molecules https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216300 ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2006-11-21 06:37 EST ------- Imported and built for devel, FC5 and FC6 branches requested. Thank you very much for the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 21 12:05:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 07:05:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216300] Review Request: chemtool - A program for 2D drawing organic molecules In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611211205.kALC5P31016314@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: chemtool - A program for 2D drawing organic molecules https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216300 rpm at greysector.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 21 12:22:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 07:22:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215165] Review Request: audacious-plugins - Plugins for the Audacious media player In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611211222.kALCM5s0017903@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: audacious-plugins - Plugins for the Audacious media player https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215165 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-11-21 07:21 EST ------- Ok got the access. I think packaging is OK now. APPROVED from me but do anyone have still any objections? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 21 13:14:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 08:14:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215165] Review Request: audacious-plugins - Plugins for the Audacious media player In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611211314.kALDE93m024088@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: audacious-plugins - Plugins for the Audacious media player https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215165 ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2006-11-21 08:13 EST ------- fluidsynth alsa-midi plugin is still missing, see comment #6. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 21 13:27:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 08:27:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216535] Review Request: mp3gain - Lossless MP3 volume adjustment tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611211327.kALDR9ZL024768@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mp3gain - Lossless MP3 volume adjustment tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216535 ------- Additional Comments From jeff at ocjtech.us 2006-11-21 08:26 EST ------- (In reply to comment #6) > In my opinon that error can probably be ignored. Yes, but since it's so easy to fix in %prep with a little sed magic: %{__sed} -i 's/\r//' lgpl.txt -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 21 14:04:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 09:04:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216517] Review Request: gnome-valgrind-session - Run an entire GNOME session under valgrind In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611211404.kALE498v027936@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-valgrind-session - Run an entire GNOME session under valgrind https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216517 mclasen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |150225 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 21 14:11:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 09:11:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 205755] Review Request: elsa - manages group of processes and allows accounting In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611211411.kALEBDdT028788@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: elsa - manages group of processes and allows accounting https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205755 ------- Additional Comments From guillaume.thouvenin at bull.net 2006-11-21 09:11 EST ------- I modified the NEWS file and removed the TODO file. There was only one entry in the TODO list and it was about the webmin part so I removed the file. SRPM URL: http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/elsa/elsa-1.4-2.src.rpm?download SOURCE URL: http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/elsa/elsa-1.4-2.tar.bz2?download -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 21 14:34:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 09:34:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 212917] Review Request: php-pear-DB-DataObject - An SQL Builder, Object Interface to Database Tables In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611211434.kALEY6rg031102@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-DB-DataObject - An SQL Builder, Object Interface to Database Tables Alias: DB-DataObject https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212917 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2006-11-21 09:34 EST ------- Build on devel succeeded. Thanks for the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 21 14:34:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 09:34:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 212916] Review Request: php-pear-DB-DataObject-FormBuilder - Automatically build HTML_QuickForm objects In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611211434.kALEYJVV031157@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-DB-DataObject-FormBuilder - Automatically build HTML_QuickForm objects Alias: DataObj-FormBuilder https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212916 Bug 212916 depends on bug 212917, which changed state. Bug 212917 Summary: Review Request: php-pear-DB-DataObject - An SQL Builder, Object Interface to Database Tables https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212917 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 21 14:44:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 09:44:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 210007] Review Request: - In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611211444.kALEiwee032266@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210007 ------- Additional Comments From Nadia.Derbey at bull.net 2006-11-21 09:44 EST ------- (In reply to comment #14) > * I think the need to have in the spec file the build against different kernels > and releases is not needed. > I agree with you that this makes quite a lot of rpm's when building for the various platforms. But if we keep only the FC6 specific part, we will loose the benefits of the library: it is supposed to ensure portability across kernel releases / distros for what concerns the kernel tunables. To ensure that portability, a 'tunable database' is needed for each supported kernel / distro. Delivering only the FC6 specific part will prevent a client with both the FC5 and FC6 installed on its machines to use the library. One thing that can be done is to deliver all the supported kernel databases in a single sub-package, and all the supported distro databases in a single sub-package. But again, this can be a problem, since somebody downloading the kernel database sub-package may potentially have unneeded data installed on its machine. Actually that's why we have decided to split each sub-package: in order to let a user choose what to download depending on what is installed on its machine. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 21 14:53:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 09:53:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 212916] Review Request: php-pear-DB-DataObject-FormBuilder - Automatically build HTML_QuickForm objects In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611211453.kALErmTa000588@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-DB-DataObject-FormBuilder - Automatically build HTML_QuickForm objects Alias: DataObj-FormBuilder https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212916 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2006-11-21 09:53 EST ------- Built for devel, thanks for the review. Will ask upstream on status of documentation (should be there since we are approaching 1.0.0 release). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 21 14:54:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 09:54:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 212919] Review Request: php-pear-Structures-DataGrid-DataSource-DataObject - DataSource driver using PEAR::DB_DataObject In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611211454.kALEs3Eg000660@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Structures-DataGrid-DataSource-DataObject - DataSource driver using PEAR::DB_DataObject Alias: DG-DataSource-DO https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212919 Bug 212919 depends on bug 212916, which changed state. Bug 212916 Summary: Review Request: php-pear-DB-DataObject-FormBuilder - Automatically build HTML_QuickForm objects https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212916 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 21 15:07:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 10:07:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215224] Review Request: gtk-murrine-engine - Murrine GTK2 engine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611211507.kALF7uup002165@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtk-murrine-engine - Murrine GTK2 engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215224 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-11-21 10:07 EST ------- (In reply to comment #9) > I am not sponsored by anyone. Well, please check: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/HowToGetSponsored -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 21 15:21:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 10:21:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 212919] Review Request: php-pear-Structures-DataGrid-DataSource-DataObject - DataSource driver using PEAR::DB_DataObject In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611211521.kALFLlpK003598@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Structures-DataGrid-DataSource-DataObject - DataSource driver using PEAR::DB_DataObject Alias: DG-DataSource-DO https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212919 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2006-11-21 10:21 EST ------- Built on devel. Thanks for the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 21 15:49:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 10:49:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216535] Review Request: mp3gain - Lossless MP3 volume adjustment tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611211549.kALFn9e5006176@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mp3gain - Lossless MP3 volume adjustment tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216535 ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at ameritech.net 2006-11-21 10:48 EST ------- (In reply to comment #7) > Is this package acceptable legally in Fedora Extras? I believe it should be ok, since it doesn't decode or re-encode. Fedora includes packages (id3lib, python-eyed3, etc) that modify tags within mp3, which isn't terribly different from what this package does. I also looked at other distros (Ubuntu, Debian, gentoo), and they include it. I've been unable to find anything that states that mp3gain has any patent issues. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 21 15:54:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 10:54:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215224] Review Request: gtk-murrine-engine - Murrine GTK2 engine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611211554.kALFstMm006582@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtk-murrine-engine - Murrine GTK2 engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215224 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-11-21 10:54 EST ------- Well, just a quick look at this package. A. From http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines : * BuildRequires: - cairo-devel fontconfig-devel freetype-devel All these are uncessary as gtk2-devel requires them. * rpmlint - is not silent. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- W: gtk-murrine-engine incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.31 0.31-2.fc7 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Please make version-release consistent. NOTE: the part of dist tag (i.e. '.fc7') is not needed to be written in %changelog. * BuildRoot - %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) is recommended. * File and Directory Ownership - /usr/share/themes is not owned by any packages needed by this package. * if this package requires gtk2-engines, please add it to Requires. * if not, please have this package own the directory. B. From http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines : * Source: - Please specify the URL. C. Other things: * Themes - I cannot understand why you chose the 3 themes. I don't think that 'their popularity' is a good reason because many people (including me) cannot judge how 'popular' they are. My thought is that you have to include _all_ themes available to avoid arbitrariness or choose one (or some) theme(s) with somewhat definitive reason. As far as I read http://cimi.netsons.org/pages/murrine/themes.php , http://cimi.netsons.org/media/download_gallery/MurrineThemePack.tar.bz2 seems the best as it says 'First Theme Pack for the Murrine Gtk2 Cairo Engine' I only checked for packaging issue. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 21 15:57:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 10:57:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215224] Review Request: gtk-murrine-engine - Murrine GTK2 engine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611211557.kALFvPYc006764@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtk-murrine-engine - Murrine GTK2 engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215224 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-11-21 10:57 EST ------- By the way is any sponsor watching this review? If not, I can be a candidate who will sponsor you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 21 16:03:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 11:03:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 211214] Review Request: mod_revocator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611211603.kALG32iZ007172@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mod_revocator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211214 rcritten at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From rcritten at redhat.com 2006-11-21 11:03 EST ------- Thanks for the review. Built for devel, FC-5 and FC-6. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 21 16:20:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 11:20:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216535] Review Request: mp3gain - Lossless MP3 volume adjustment tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611211620.kALGKeIf008591@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mp3gain - Lossless MP3 volume adjustment tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216535 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2006-11-21 11:20 EST ------- Just a note: don't make any acceptability conclusions based on something being included in other distros, the policies are different. For example, all the mentioned distros (and Mandriva) include support for actual MP3 decoding via libmad and a bunch of other things that are a no go for Fedora within the current policies. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 21 16:21:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 11:21:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216544] Review Request: libdvdread - Simple foundation for reading DVD video disks In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611211621.kALGLHK3008693@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libdvdread - Simple foundation for reading DVD video disks https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216544 ------- Additional Comments From lemenkov at gmail.com 2006-11-21 11:21 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > (In reply to comment #2) > > > Note: it does not support encrypted DVDs (i.e. doesn't contain libdvdcss). > > > > So it's completely useless. > > Not quite. You can install libdvdcss from another repository and it'll work with > encrypted DVDs, too. Oops. Sorry. In this case it really valuable. ) I reviewed the code and saw that it loads libdvdcss.so.2 in our case. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 21 16:23:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 11:23:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214024] Review Request: perl-Net-DBus - Net::DBus Perl module In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611211623.kALGNDwW008978@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-DBus - Net::DBus Perl module https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214024 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-11-21 11:23 EST ------- I guess you can just delete that test so that the package will build properly. CVS is back up now, so check in when you like. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 21 16:52:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 11:52:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 193446] Review Request: GLiv: OpenGL image viewer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611211652.kALGqBWq012132@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: GLiv: OpenGL image viewer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193446 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-11-21 11:52 EST ------- Is this review request stalled? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 21 17:02:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 12:02:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214087] Review Request: libextractor -- Simple library for keyword extraction In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611211702.kALH2moN013256@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libextractor -- Simple library for keyword extraction https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214087 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-11-21 12:02 EST ------- Well, I don't know this package at all, however, it seems that 0.5.16 is released. So would you update this package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 21 17:47:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 12:47:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215165] Review Request: audacious-plugins - Plugins for the Audacious media player In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611211747.kALHl5Ma017065@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: audacious-plugins - Plugins for the Audacious media player https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215165 ------- Additional Comments From redhat-bugzilla at camperquake.de 2006-11-21 12:46 EST ------- fluidsynth added -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 21 17:49:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 12:49:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 193446] Review Request: GLiv: OpenGL image viewer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611211749.kALHnlA8017246@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: GLiv: OpenGL image viewer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193446 ------- Additional Comments From madcat at mymadcat.com 2006-11-21 12:49 EST ------- Not if Peter Lemenkov handle the packaging. If not, then yes :) I won't have the time to do it myself this year -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 21 18:10:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 13:10:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216723] New: Review Request: libsieve - A library for parsing, sorting and filtering your mail Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216723 Summary: Review Request: libsieve - A library for parsing, sorting and filtering your mail Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: bjohnson at symetrix.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.symetrix.com/~bjohnson/projects/Fedora-Extras/libsieve.spec SRPM URL: http://www.symetrix.com/~bjohnson/projects/Fedora-Extras/libsieve-2.1.13-1.1.src.rpm Description: libSieve provides a library to interpret Sieve scripts, and to execute those scripts over a given set of messages. The return codes from the libSieve functions let your program know how to handle the message, and then it's up to you to make it so. libSieve makes no attempt to have knowledge of how SMTP, IMAP, or anything else work; just how to parse and deal with a buffer full of emails. The rest is up to you! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 21 18:19:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 13:19:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 210007] Review Request: - In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611211819.kALIJ8km020094@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210007 ------- Additional Comments From konradr at redhat.com 2006-11-21 13:19 EST ------- I think I was not specific enough. The thought is that it would be generic enough that when build against a specific release - it would create an RPM against that one. If I built under FC5, it would build a FC5-tunable package for the kernel that is in FC5. and not a FC6 one. If I built it under FC6, it would build a FC-6-tunable package for the kernel that is in FC6, and not a FC5 one. and so on. This would have to be generic enough so that when FC7 comes, there is no need to alter the SPEC file. Or if it has to be done - just the minum if possible. In regards to your comment about "portability across distros" is a moot point. This RPM/SPEC is specific for Fedora Core and RHEL. This spec file will not be used by Novell/SuSE. Novell will have require their own .spec file, with different fields. I am not sure what you mean by "somebody downloading the kernel database". When the RPM is installed, does it not include all the neccesary data? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 21 18:27:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 13:27:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 205755] Review Request: elsa - manages group of processes and allows accounting In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611211827.kALIRFMx020962@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: elsa - manages group of processes and allows accounting https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205755 konradr at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jwboyer at jdub.homelinux.org ------- Additional Comments From konradr at redhat.com 2006-11-21 13:27 EST ------- Josh, I have completed my review. Throwing over to you :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 21 18:54:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 13:54:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214024] Review Request: perl-Net-DBus - Net::DBus Perl module In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611211854.kALIsEDs023312@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-DBus - Net::DBus Perl module https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214024 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-11-21 13:54 EST ------- Done! Thanks for the review :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 21 18:55:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 13:55:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215865] Review Request: Zim - Desktop wiki & notekeeper In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611211855.kALIt1dC023409@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Zim - Desktop wiki & notekeeper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215865 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-11-21 13:54 EST ------- Done, thanks! :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 21 19:01:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 14:01:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216734] New: Review Request: gnome-compiz-manager - compiz configuration utility Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216734 Summary: Review Request: gnome-compiz-manager - compiz configuration utility Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jpmahowald at gmail.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://fedorared.org/repos/rpmbuild/SPECS/gnome-compiz-manager.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorared.org/fedora/review/gnome-compiz-manager-0.9.10-1.src.rpm Description: Gnome compiz manager is small utility, which manage GL Desktop configuration on XGL/AiGLX. It?s composed of two applications : - compiz-tray-icon : which launch and stop compiz - gnome-compiz-preferences : which adjust GL effects The goal isn?t to propose all compiz options but allow a simple configuration of compiz. ---------- Note that this package still contains rpaths. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 21 19:10:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 14:10:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215224] Review Request: gtk-murrine-engine - Murrine GTK2 engine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611211910.kALJAOV4024876@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtk-murrine-engine - Murrine GTK2 engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215224 ------- Additional Comments From sdl.web at gmail.com 2006-11-21 14:10 EST ------- (In reply to comment #11) > Well, just a quick look at this package. > > A. From http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines : > * BuildRequires: > - cairo-devel fontconfig-devel freetype-devel > All these are uncessary as gtk2-devel requires them. Corrected with only gtk2-devel. > > * rpmlint > - is not silent. > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > W: gtk-murrine-engine incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.31 0.31-2.fc7 > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > Please make version-release consistent. > NOTE: the part of dist tag (i.e. '.fc7') is not needed to be written > in %changelog. Don't know what to do with this. It seems I have no .fc7 in log entries. > > * BuildRoot > - %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) is > recommended. corrected. > > * File and Directory Ownership > - /usr/share/themes > is not owned by any packages needed by this package. > * if this package requires gtk2-engines, please add it to Requires. > * if not, please have this package own the directory. > > B. From http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines : > * Source: > - Please specify the URL. Done. > > C. Other things: > > * Themes > - I cannot understand why you chose the 3 themes. I don't think that > 'their popularity' is a good reason because many people (including > me) cannot judge how 'popular' they are. > My thought is that you have to include _all_ themes available to > avoid arbitrariness or choose one (or some) theme(s) with > somewhat definitive reason. > > As far as I read http://cimi.netsons.org/pages/murrine/themes.php , > http://cimi.netsons.org/media/download_gallery/MurrineThemePack.tar.bz2 > seems the best as it says 'First Theme Pack for the > Murrine Gtk2 Cairo Engine' themes from replaced with all Murrine themes from the author's website. > > I only checked for packaging issue. Thank you very much for your input. Updated files: http://www.srcf.ucam.org/~sl392/fedora/SRPMs/gtk-murrine-engine.spec http://www.srcf.ucam.org/~sl392/fedora/SRPMs/gtk-murrine-engine-0.31-3.leofc5.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 21 19:39:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 14:39:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 210287] Review Request: Qt# - A set of qt bindings for mono In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611211939.kALJdsGK028032@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Qt# - A set of qt bindings for mono https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210287 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-11-21 14:39 EST ------- Well, actually I don't know about C sharp program, however, as this package is not reviewed by anyone for more than one month and it is a pity that this package is not imported despite you seem familiar with C sharp programming, so I will try. Then: 1. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines : * Use rpmlint - rpmlint is not silent. ---------------------------------------------- E: qtsharp zero-length /usr/share/doc/qtsharp-0.7.1/ChangeLog W: qtsharp rpm-buildroot-usage %build qmake "CSC=mcs" INSTALLDIR=%{buildroot}/%{_libdir} W: qtsharp-devel no-documentation ---------------------------------------------- - Remove ChangeLog. - I don't think that giving the argument which includes %{buildroot} during %build stage is correct. - The last one can be ignorable, I think. * Requires: - Requires: qt mono-core These are unnecessary as libraries' dependency automatically pulls them. * Compiler flags - For compilation of C sharp code, I don't know. Howver, ------------------------------------------------- make[2]: Entering directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/qtsharp/src/libqtsharp' g++ -c -pipe -Wall -W -g -D_REENTRANT -fPIC -DQT_THREAD_SUPPORT -DQT_SHARED -DQT_NO_DEBUG -I/usr/lib/qt-3.3/mkspecs/de fault -I. -I. -I.. -I/usr/lib/qt-3.3/include -o customslot.o customslot.cpp g++ -c -pipe -Wall -W -g -D_REENTRANT -fPIC -DQT_THREAD_SUPPORT -DQT_SHARED -DQT_NO_DEBUG -I/usr/lib/qt-3.3/mkspecs/de fault -I. -I. -I.. -I/usr/lib/qt-3.3/include -o qtsharp.o qtsharp.cpp ------------------------------------------------- This is incorrect because fedora specific compilation flags is not used. * Parallel make - Does this package fail on parallel make? 2. From http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines : (seems okay). 3. Other files I have noticed. * -devel package: devel package contains only a symlink to shared object, without any header files. I don't think this devel package is useful as so application can use this package because there is no way to know the prototype used in the shared library. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 21 19:41:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 14:41:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 201418] Review Request: widelands - GPL Settlers II clone In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611211941.kALJfcI3028232@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: widelands - GPL Settlers II clone https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201418 ------- Additional Comments From brkamikaze at gmail.com 2006-11-21 14:41 EST ------- Some schoolwork prevented me from working on the package yesterday. I'm compiling the widelands package right now, with most of the changes implemented. The glob2 package is currently unbuildable due to changes on the freetype-devel package on FC6. It looks like it now doesn't include the '/usr/include/freetype2/freetype/internal' directory like it did before, and I don't know how to fix that on the code to make a patch. Filed a bug report on glob2's bugzilla since it shouldn't be using an internal header. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 21 19:48:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 14:48:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215224] Review Request: gtk-murrine-engine - Murrine GTK2 engine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611211948.kALJmU6E028956@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtk-murrine-engine - Murrine GTK2 engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215224 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-11-21 14:48 EST ------- Before checking 0.31-3: (In reply to comment #13) > > * rpmlint > > - is not silent. > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > W: gtk-murrine-engine incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.31 0.31-2.fc7 > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Please make version-release consistent. > > NOTE: the part of dist tag (i.e. '.fc7') is not needed to be written > > in %changelog. > > Don't know what to do with this. It seems I have no .fc7 in log entries. This means that you have to write like: * Tue Nov 21 2006 Shidai Liu, Leo 0.31-3 - remove themes from gnome-look - remove CREDITS patch - add all themes from upstream * Thu Nov 16 2006 Shidai Liu, Leo 0.31-2 - 0.31 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 21 19:50:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 14:50:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215224] Review Request: gtk-murrine-engine - Murrine GTK2 engine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611211950.kALJoLBi029133@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtk-murrine-engine - Murrine GTK2 engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215224 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-11-21 14:50 EST ------- Assiging to me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 21 20:10:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 15:10:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 211626] Review Request: xtide - Calculate tide all over the world In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611212010.kALKAZqh030836@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xtide - Calculate tide all over the world https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211626 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-11-21 15:10 EST ------- ( Only writing the information that repackaging is in progress ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 21 20:19:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 15:19:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216526] Review Request: perl-String-Approx Perl extension for approximate matching (fuzzy matching) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611212019.kALKJwpb031991@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-String-Approx Perl extension for approximate matching (fuzzy matching) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216526 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |pertusus at free.fr OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-11-21 15:19 EST ------- * rpmlint is silent * correctly named * follow guidelines * match upstream fc14d72986431025125d4970dd6b7f88 String-Approx-3.26.tar.gz * sane provides (Approx.so is classic bogus provides) Provides: Approx.so perl(String::Approx) = 3.26 * %files section right -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 21 20:38:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 15:38:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 201418] Review Request: widelands - GPL Settlers II clone In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611212038.kALKceWF001481@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: widelands - GPL Settlers II clone https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201418 ------- Additional Comments From brkamikaze at gmail.com 2006-11-21 15:38 EST ------- I'm uploading the new SRPM. I don't know how to make desktop-file-install stop complaining about the encoding, so I'd like some hints. As widelands is growing, the package is now about 25 megs. If I need to split it into widelands{,-data}, I need some info on how to do it and if it is worthy. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 21 20:40:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 15:40:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 193446] Review Request: GLiv: OpenGL image viewer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611212040.kALKeBqM001693@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: GLiv: OpenGL image viewer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193446 ------- Additional Comments From lemenkov at gmail.com 2006-11-21 15:40 EST ------- I'll take it over. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 21 20:51:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 15:51:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 201418] Review Request: widelands - GPL Settlers II clone In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611212051.kALKptZp002685@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: widelands - GPL Settlers II clone https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201418 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-11-21 15:51 EST ------- (In reply to comment #14) > I'm uploading the new SRPM. I don't know how to make desktop-file-install stop > complaining about the encoding, so I'd like some hints. > Does the desktop file include a line like this? : Encoding=UTF-8 And is it actually a UTF-8 file? > As widelands is growing, the package is now about 25 megs. If I need to split it > into widelands{,-data}, I need some info on how to do it and if it is worthy. A seperate -data package is only usefull if upstream provides a seperate tarbal for data and there can thus be 2 seperate SRPMS. Otherwise there is no use in having a seperate -data package ( I know the Games SIG page claims otherwise, but its wrong). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 21 20:54:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 15:54:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216755] New: Review Request: GLiv - OpenGL image viewer Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216755 Summary: Review Request: GLiv - OpenGL image viewer Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lemenkov at gmail.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://lemenkov.newmail.ru/SPECS/gliv.spec SRPM URL: http://lemenkov.newmail.ru/SRPMS/gliv-1.9.5-2.src.rpm Description: GLiv is an OpenGL image viewer. GLiv is very fast and smooth at rotating, panning and zooming if you have an OpenGL accelerated graphics board. This review request is a duplicate of stalled bug #193446 Madcat willingly let me to take over this package. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193446 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 21 20:55:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 15:55:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215563] Review Request: aquamarine - Themeable window decorator and compositing manager for Beryl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611212055.kALKtIYU002988@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aquamarine - Themeable window decorator and compositing manager for Beryl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215563 jwilson at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 21 20:55:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 15:55:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215571] Review Request: heliodor - Beryl window decorator with Metacity theme support In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611212055.kALKtWnR003012@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: heliodor - Beryl window decorator with Metacity theme support https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215571 jwilson at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 21 20:55:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 15:55:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215564] Review Request: bdock - Beryl project's replacement windowmaker dock In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611212055.kALKteSQ003038@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bdock - Beryl project's replacement windowmaker dock https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215564 jwilson at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 21 20:55:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 15:55:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 193446] Review Request: GLiv: OpenGL image viewer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611212055.kALKtukY003088@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: GLiv: OpenGL image viewer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193446 ------- Additional Comments From lemenkov at gmail.com 2006-11-21 15:55 EST ------- See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216755 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 21 20:58:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 15:58:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 209264] Review Request: emerald-themes - Themes for Emerald, the window decorator for Beryl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611212058.kALKwDkd003281@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: emerald-themes - Themes for Emerald, the window decorator for Beryl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209264 jwilson at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 21 20:59:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 15:59:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 209263] Review Request: emerald - Themeable window decorator and compositing manager for Beryl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611212059.kALKxDgw003431@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: emerald - Themeable window decorator and compositing manager for Beryl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209263 jwilson at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 21 21:01:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 16:01:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 209262] Review Request: beryl-plugins - Beryl OpenGL window and compositing manager plug-ins In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611212101.kALL173I003704@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: beryl-plugins - Beryl OpenGL window and compositing manager plug-ins https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209262 jwilson at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 21 21:05:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 16:05:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 209261] Review Request: beryl-settings - Beryl OpenGL window and compositing manager GUI config utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611212105.kALL5eQo004125@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: beryl-settings - Beryl OpenGL window and compositing manager GUI config utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209261 jwilson at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 21 21:05:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 16:05:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 209260] Review Request: beryl-manager - Beryl window decorator and theme management utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611212105.kALL5oeJ004151@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: beryl-manager - Beryl window decorator and theme management utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209260 jwilson at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 21 21:06:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 16:06:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 201418] Review Request: widelands - GPL Settlers II clone In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611212106.kALL6fNA004367@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: widelands - GPL Settlers II clone https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201418 ------- Additional Comments From brkamikaze at gmail.com 2006-11-21 16:06 EST ------- It does not include any Encoding line and the freedesktop.org's specifications don't say that Encoding is a valid line. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 21 21:09:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 16:09:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215568] Review Request: beryl-dbus - Beryl OpenGL window and compositing manager dbus plug-in In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611212109.kALL9BdY004585@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: beryl-dbus - Beryl OpenGL window and compositing manager dbus plug-in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215568 jwilson at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 21 21:11:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 16:11:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 209260] Review Request: beryl-manager - Beryl window decorator and theme management utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611212111.kALLBY0v004878@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: beryl-manager - Beryl window decorator and theme management utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209260 ------- Additional Comments From mr.ecik at gmail.com 2006-11-21 16:11 EST ------- Hmmm... are you going to create a desktop file I mentioned above? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 21 21:13:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 16:13:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 201418] Review Request: widelands - GPL Settlers II clone In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611212113.kALLDp5J005212@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: widelands - GPL Settlers II clone https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201418 ------- Additional Comments From brkamikaze at gmail.com 2006-11-21 16:13 EST ------- I tested the game and it is segfaulting when you enter a map. I will upload only the new specfile and upload the rest when the game is "less unstable". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 21 21:15:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 16:15:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215444] Review Request: netcdf-perl Perl extension module for scientific data access via the netCDF API In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611212115.kALLFQRu005474@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: netcdf-perl Perl extension module for scientific data access via the netCDF API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215444 ------- Additional Comments From orion at cora.nwra.com 2006-11-21 16:15 EST ------- Where do we stand now? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 21 21:56:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 16:56:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 212925] Review Request: php-pear-Structures-DataGrid-DataSource-RSS - DataSource driver using RSS files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611212156.kALLuPEO009575@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Structures-DataGrid-DataSource-RSS - DataSource driver using RSS files Alias: pear-DG-RSS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212925 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias|DG-DS-RSS |pear-DG-RSS -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 21 21:56:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 16:56:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 212924] Review Request: php-pear-Structures-DataGrid-DataSource-Array - DataSource driver using arrays In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611212156.kALLubIq009587@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Structures-DataGrid-DataSource-Array - DataSource driver using arrays Alias: pear-DG-Array https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212924 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias|DG-DS-Array |pear-DG-Array -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 21 22:27:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 17:27:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 193446] Review Request: GLiv: OpenGL image viewer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611212227.kALMR4HJ012380@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: GLiv: OpenGL image viewer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193446 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE OtherBugsDependingO|163776, 177841 |201449 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-11-21 17:26 EST ------- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 216755 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 21 22:27:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 17:27:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216755] Review Request: GLiv - OpenGL image viewer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611212227.kALMRFJe012402@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: GLiv - OpenGL image viewer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216755 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |madcat at mymadcat.com ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-11-21 17:27 EST ------- *** Bug 193446 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 21 22:59:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 17:59:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216534] Review Request: gocr - GNU Optical Character Recognition program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611212259.kALMx7Uj014203@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gocr - GNU Optical Character Recognition program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216534 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pertusus at free.fr ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-11-21 17:59 EST ------- In files, the de file could be marked as: %lang(de) %doc READMEde.txt There is a gtk frontend, maybe it could be shipped in a sub-package? There is a missing dependency on wish. I also think that maybe it could make sense to have gocr-tcl for gocr.tcl, because of that requires? There are many Requires missing. At least (in pnm.c), gzip, bzip2, transfig, netpbm-progs, libjpeg Maybe upstream could use convert... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 21 23:10:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 18:10:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216755] Review Request: GLiv - OpenGL image viewer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611212310.kALNAZrF014892@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: GLiv - OpenGL image viewer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216755 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-11-21 18:10 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=141851) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=141851&action=view) Mock build log of gliv 1.9.5-2.fc7 mockbuild on FC-devel i386 fails. Please check the build log. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 21 23:11:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 18:11:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215224] Review Request: gtk-murrine-engine - Murrine GTK2 engine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611212311.kALNBPTA015047@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtk-murrine-engine - Murrine GTK2 engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215224 ------- Additional Comments From sdl.web at gmail.com 2006-11-21 18:11 EST ------- (In reply to comment #14) > This means that you have to write like: > > * Tue Nov 21 2006 Shidai Liu, Leo 0.31-3 > - remove themes from gnome-look > - remove CREDITS patch > - add all themes from upstream > > * Thu Nov 16 2006 Shidai Liu, Leo 0.31-2 > - 0.31 > Done! http://www.srcf.ucam.org/~sl392/fedora/SRPMs/gtk-murrine-engine.spec http://www.srcf.ucam.org/~sl392/fedora/SRPMs/gtk-murrine-engine-0.31-3.leofc5.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 21 23:12:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 18:12:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216284] Review Request: dd2 - Dodgin' Diamond 2 - Shoot'em up arcade game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611212312.kALNCd4q015185@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dd2 - Dodgin' Diamond 2 - Shoot'em up arcade game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216284 ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2006-11-21 18:12 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > Ah what fun binary driver crap crashes. Thats why I only use opensource drivers > (and select my hardware based on that criteria). Anyways I can find nothing > usefull in the strace. Can you run this under gdb from the console (do "export > DISPLAY=:0.0" first) and then once it crashes switch back to the console to get > a backtrace? Maybe that will give us a hint on whats going on and howto work > around it. If that doesn't help please go file a bug with nvidea. FYI: It looks like the same problem as described here: http://bugzilla.livna.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1266 It's nothing for you to worry about; just thought I'd follow up so that you knew what the problem was. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 22 00:03:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 19:03:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216785] New: Review Request: perl-Gnome2-Print - Perl wrappers for the Gnome Print utilities Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216785 Summary: Review Request: perl-Gnome2-Print - Perl wrappers for the Gnome Print utilities Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Gnome2-Print/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com SRPM URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-Gnome2-Print-1.000-1.fc6.src.rpm SPEC URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-Gnome2-Print.spec Description: This module allows you to use the GNOME Print libraries within your applications written using the gtk2-perl wrapper. The GNOME Print libraries (also known as libgnomeprint and libgnomeprintui) allow you to create printable documents (using various frontends) and offer standard widgets in order to mainatin a UI consistent for all GNOME applications. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 22 00:04:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 19:04:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216785] Review Request: perl-Gnome2-Print - Perl wrappers for the Gnome Print utilities In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611220004.kAM04Crq018405@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Gnome2-Print - Perl wrappers for the Gnome Print utilities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216785 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |163776 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 22 02:36:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 21:36:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216363] Review Request: labyrinth - Simple but powerful mind-mapping software for GNOME In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611220236.kAM2adcl024125@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: labyrinth - Simple but powerful mind-mapping software for GNOME https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216363 peter at thecodergeek.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From peter at thecodergeek.com 2006-11-21 21:36 EST ------- Thanks for your review and comments. It's built on devel; and FC-5 and FC-6 branches have been requested. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 22 03:04:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 22:04:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 209260] Review Request: beryl-manager - Beryl window decorator and theme management utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611220304.kAM34ruU024722@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: beryl-manager - Beryl window decorator and theme management utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209260 ------- Additional Comments From jwilson at redhat.com 2006-11-21 22:04 EST ------- (In reply to comment #16) > Hmmm... are you going to create a desktop file I mentioned above? Whoops, yes, been meaning to address that, its still on my todo list. I need to dig up a high(er) resolution beryl icon and throw it in there. I'll see what I can do on that front tonight or tomorrow. I also still need to look into the po/mo files being created... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 22 04:00:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 23:00:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215165] Review Request: audacious-plugins - Plugins for the Audacious media player In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611220400.kAM40Hfc028458@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: audacious-plugins - Plugins for the Audacious media player https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215165 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-11-21 23:00 EST ------- where? why are you not posting updated direct download links here? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 22 04:01:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 23:01:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216785] Review Request: perl-Gnome2-Print - Perl wrappers for the Gnome Print utilities In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611220401.kAM41dxs028622@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Gnome2-Print - Perl wrappers for the Gnome Print utilities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216785 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |panemade at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-11-21 23:01 EST ------- Tell me how can i use this package or test its working in FC6 core? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 22 04:10:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 23:10:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216785] Review Request: perl-Gnome2-Print - Perl wrappers for the Gnome Print utilities In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611220410.kAM4Ax7J029641@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Gnome2-Print - Perl wrappers for the Gnome Print utilities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216785 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-11-21 23:10 EST ------- There are a number of sample scripts that come in the examples directory (or, when the rpm is installed, under %doc). Running one or more of those should enable you to examine the functionailty of the module proper. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 22 05:27:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 00:27:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216535] Review Request: mp3gain - Lossless MP3 volume adjustment tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611220527.kAM5RxIg003928@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mp3gain - Lossless MP3 volume adjustment tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216535 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-11-22 00:27 EST ------- I suggest you better discuss on fedora-extras mailing list. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 22 05:36:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 00:36:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216785] Review Request: perl-Gnome2-Print - Perl wrappers for the Gnome Print utilities In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611220536.kAM5a4Qh004298@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Gnome2-Print - Perl wrappers for the Gnome Print utilities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216785 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 22 05:58:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 00:58:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216785] Review Request: perl-Gnome2-Print - Perl wrappers for the Gnome Print utilities In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611220558.kAM5wR5C005198@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Gnome2-Print - Perl wrappers for the Gnome Print utilities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216785 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-11-22 00:58 EST ------- Did mock build and found under build.log Unrecognized argument in LIBS ignored: '-pthread' Got some rpmlint Warnings W: perl-Gnome2-Print devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/i386-linux-thread-multi/Gnome2/Print/Install/gnomeprintperl-autogen.h A development file (usually source code) is located in a non-devel package. If you want to include source code in your package, be sure to create a development package. W: perl-Gnome2-Print devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/i386-linux-thread-multi/Gnome2/Print/Install/gnomeprintperl-version.h A development file (usually source code) is located in a non-devel package. If you want to include source code in your package, be sure to create a development package. W: perl-Gnome2-Print devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/i386-linux-thread-multi/Gnome2/Print/Install/gnomeprintperl.h A development file (usually source code) is located in a non-devel package. If you want to include source code in your package, be sure to create a development package. are those can be ignored for perl packages?? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 22 06:04:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 01:04:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216519] Review Request: sdparm - List or change SCSI disk parameters In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611220604.kAM64W7h005427@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sdparm - List or change SCSI disk parameters https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216519 peter at thecodergeek.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From peter at thecodergeek.com 2006-11-22 01:04 EST ------- I'll do a formal review of this tomorrow after classes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 22 06:05:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 01:05:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216519] Review Request: sdparm - List or change SCSI disk parameters In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611220605.kAM65Fnf005489@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sdparm - List or change SCSI disk parameters https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216519 peter at thecodergeek.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |peter at thecodergeek.com ------- Additional Comments From peter at thecodergeek.com 2006-11-22 01:05 EST ------- I'll do a formal review of this tomorrow after classes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 22 06:05:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 01:05:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216785] Review Request: perl-Gnome2-Print - Perl wrappers for the Gnome Print utilities In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611220605.kAM65a7V005508@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Gnome2-Print - Perl wrappers for the Gnome Print utilities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216785 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-11-22 01:05 EST ------- Those warnings can be safely ignored for perl packages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 22 06:08:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 01:08:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216519] Review Request: sdparm - List or change SCSI disk parameters In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611220608.kAM68GKA005584@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sdparm - List or change SCSI disk parameters https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216519 ------- Additional Comments From peter at thecodergeek.com 2006-11-22 01:08 EST ------- Er. Sorry about the double comment there. How odd. :S -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 22 06:19:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 01:19:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215200] Review Request: php-pear-Services-Weather - This class acts as an interface to various online weather-services In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611220619.kAM6JI0H005961@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Services-Weather - This class acts as an interface to various online weather-services Alias: pear-Svcs-Weather https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215200 Fedora at FamilleCollet.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 22 06:32:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 01:32:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216785] Review Request: perl-Gnome2-Print - Perl wrappers for the Gnome Print utilities In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611220632.kAM6WsvB006448@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Gnome2-Print - Perl wrappers for the Gnome Print utilities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216785 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-11-22 01:32 EST ------- Not able to find license file(Is am i missing something)? Still Unrecognized argument in LIBS ignored: '-pthread' message coming not understanding which causes this message to appear? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 22 06:46:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 01:46:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216785] Review Request: perl-Gnome2-Print - Perl wrappers for the Gnome Print utilities In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611220646.kAM6ka9B007098@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Gnome2-Print - Perl wrappers for the Gnome Print utilities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216785 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2006-11-22 01:46 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > Not able to find license file(Is am i missing something)? Yes, you are missing something: Nobody is obliged to ship one. Perl module files typically contain licenses embedded into their source files. > Still Unrecognized argument in LIBS ignored: '-pthread' message coming > not understanding which causes this message to appear? IIRC, this is a bug/crappy code somewhere in some of the perl-Gtk/Gnome infrastructure. I recall this had appeared several times before, but I don't recall all details on how this had been resolved. Googling/searching bugzilla might provide further insights. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 22 06:53:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 01:53:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216755] Review Request: GLiv - OpenGL image viewer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611220653.kAM6rNHr007312@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: GLiv - OpenGL image viewer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216755 ------- Additional Comments From lemenkov at gmail.com 2006-11-22 01:53 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > Created an attachment (id=141851) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=141851&action=view) [edit] > Mock build log of gliv 1.9.5-2.fc7 > > mockbuild on FC-devel i386 fails. > Please check the build log. Added missing BR. Updated to 1.9.6 http://lemenkov.newmail.ru/SPECS/gliv.spec http://lemenkov.newmail.ru/SRPMS/gliv-1.9.6-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 22 07:07:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 02:07:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216785] Review Request: perl-Gnome2-Print - Perl wrappers for the Gnome Print utilities In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611220707.kAM77kcL007699@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Gnome2-Print - Perl wrappers for the Gnome Print utilities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216785 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-11-22 02:07 EST ------- Does that be a blocker? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 22 07:21:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 02:21:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216755] Review Request: GLiv - OpenGL image viewer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611220721.kAM7LYNh008216@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: GLiv - OpenGL image viewer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216755 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 22 07:43:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 02:43:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 193106] Review Request: gtkmozembedmm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611220743.kAM7hwXI008923@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtkmozembedmm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193106 karlthered at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From karlthered at gmail.com 2006-11-22 02:43 EST ------- I have imported and built the package yesterday. Closed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 22 07:55:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 02:55:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215224] Review Request: gtk-murrine-engine - Murrine GTK2 engine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611220755.kAM7tcCG009323@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtk-murrine-engine - Murrine GTK2 engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215224 ------- Additional Comments From karlthered at gmail.com 2006-11-22 02:55 EST ------- Splitting is not unnecessary, you should reconsider this issue. It will avoid to update the whole package when either one of the theme or the engine gets updated. Others gtk-engines packaged in Extras do the same. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 22 08:01:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 03:01:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216785] Review Request: perl-Gnome2-Print - Perl wrappers for the Gnome Print utilities In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611220801.kAM81p8G009573@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Gnome2-Print - Perl wrappers for the Gnome Print utilities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216785 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2006-11-22 03:01 EST ------- (In reply to comment #7) > Does that be a blocker? I just found a reference: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=166252 ... so people seem to preferr to ignore this bug :( -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 22 09:11:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 04:11:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216734] Review Request: gnome-compiz-manager - compiz configuration utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611220911.kAM9BenL014621@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-compiz-manager - compiz configuration utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216734 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |panemade at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-11-22 04:11 EST ------- I installed this package but when i tried to run it, i got bug report. Is am i missing anything on my FC6? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 22 09:26:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 04:26:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216734] Review Request: gnome-compiz-manager - compiz configuration utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611220926.kAM9QLTP015676@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-compiz-manager - compiz configuration utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216734 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-11-22 04:26 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=141886) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=141886&action=view) bug report -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 22 09:27:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 04:27:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216785] Review Request: perl-Gnome2-Print - Perl wrappers for the Gnome Print utilities In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611220927.kAM9RgUG015724@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Gnome2-Print - Perl wrappers for the Gnome Print utilities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216785 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-11-22 04:27 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and but NOT for RPMS. But those warnings are ignored. + source files match upstream. 66578c2ffaebbe035a0735e65ad71c3f Gnome2-Print-1.000.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. License text included in package. + %doc is small; no -doc subpackage required. + %doc does not affect runtime. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage exists + no .la files. + no translations are available + Dose owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + Followed perl packaging guidelines. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 22 09:31:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 04:31:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216785] Review Request: perl-Gnome2-Print - Perl wrappers for the Gnome Print utilities In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611220931.kAM9VRIo015946@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Gnome2-Print - Perl wrappers for the Gnome Print utilities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216785 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-11-22 04:31 EST ------- Don't Forget to CLOSE this with NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 22 13:17:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 08:17:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215224] Review Request: gtk-murrine-engine - Murrine GTK2 engine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611221317.kAMDHonK028659@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtk-murrine-engine - Murrine GTK2 engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215224 ------- Additional Comments From sdl.web at gmail.com 2006-11-22 08:17 EST ------- (In reply to comment #17) > Splitting is not unnecessary, you should reconsider this issue. > It will avoid to update the whole package when either one of the theme or the > engine gets updated. Others gtk-engines packaged in Extras do the same. Agree. Does this mean I need to package the themes in another SRPM and submit it for review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 22 13:19:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 08:19:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215224] Review Request: gtk-murrine-engine - Murrine GTK2 engine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611221319.kAMDJaUu028770@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtk-murrine-engine - Murrine GTK2 engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215224 ------- Additional Comments From sdl.web at gmail.com 2006-11-22 08:19 EST ------- Another issue is, themes have no version number and usually they are updated when the engine is updated. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 22 14:07:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 09:07:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 188138] Review Request: mod_auth_ntlm_winbind - NTLM authentication for the Apache web server using winbind daemon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611221407.kAME7Y3J000354@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mod_auth_ntlm_winbind - NTLM authentication for the Apache web server using winbind daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188138 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |nobody at fedoraproject.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 22 14:09:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 09:09:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216734] Review Request: gnome-compiz-manager - compiz configuration utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611221409.kAME9sNt000585@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-compiz-manager - compiz configuration utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216734 ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2006-11-22 09:09 EST ------- I don't see any debug symbols. Could you install the debuginfo subpackage and try again? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 22 14:24:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 09:24:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216755] Review Request: GLiv - OpenGL image viewer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611221424.kAMEO8dB002159@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: GLiv - OpenGL image viewer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216755 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-11-22 09:23 EST ------- Well; 1. From http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines : * Use rpmlint - Rpmlint is not silent. ----------------------------------------------------------- //usr/share/applications/fedora-gliv.desktop: warning: Categories values must be one of (found "Application") //usr/share/applications/fedora-gliv.desktop: warning: Categories values must be one of (found "X-Red-Hat-Base") ----------------------------------------------------------- The category 'Application' and 'X-Red-Hat-Base' is no longer used (since desktop-file-utils 0.11) and this should be removed. NOTE: These warnings can be seem only in FC-devel. * Documentation ------------------------------- %doc %{_mandir}/man1/gliv.1* %doc %{_mandir}/*/man1/gliv.1* ------------------------------ - man manual files should not be marked as %doc. * Why the %makeinstall macro should not be used - Don't use %makeinstall macro as this is known to be broken. * Scriptlets requirements: Please check http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets * desktop-database - fedora-gliv.desktop has MimeType and this requires 'update-desktop-database'. 2. From http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines : * The sources .... as provided in the spec URL -------------------------------------------- [tasaka1 at localhost gliv]$ LANG=C wget -N http://guichaz.free.fr/gliv/gliv-1.9.6.tar.bz2 --23:19:24-- http://guichaz.free.fr/gliv/gliv-1.9.6.tar.bz2 Resolving guichaz.free.fr... 212.27.63.100 Connecting to guichaz.free.fr|212.27.63.100|:80... connected. HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 404 Not Found 23:19:25 ERROR 404: Not Found. -------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 22 15:06:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 10:06:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216755] Review Request: GLiv - OpenGL image viewer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611221506.kAMF6Ymi006038@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: GLiv - OpenGL image viewer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216755 ------- Additional Comments From lemenkov at gmail.com 2006-11-22 10:06 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > Well; > > 1. From http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines : > * Use rpmlint > - Rpmlint is not silent. Fixed. > * Documentation > ------------------------------- > %doc %{_mandir}/man1/gliv.1* > %doc %{_mandir}/*/man1/gliv.1* > ------------------------------ > - man manual files should not be marked as %doc. Done. > * Why the %makeinstall macro should not be used > - Don't use %makeinstall macro as this is known to be broken. Fixed. > 2. From http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines : > * The sources .... as provided in the spec URL Fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 22 15:14:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 10:14:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215224] Review Request: gtk-murrine-engine - Murrine GTK2 engine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611221514.kAMFElUo006565@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtk-murrine-engine - Murrine GTK2 engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215224 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-11-22 10:14 EST ------- My thought is: 1. Providing some package without any version usually means 'this package won't be updated'. 2. Splitting noarch component is highly recommend when - the noarch component is updated frequently - or the component is 'rather' large I think the themes included in this package doesn't seem to fulfill neither condition and I see little benefit for splitting themes. (In reply to comment #19) > Another issue is, themes have no version number and usually > they are updated > when the engine is updated. Also in this case, there is little benefit for splitting themes. However, you can ask upstream if there is any plan that the themes you included in this srpm will be updated. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 22 15:16:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 10:16:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216755] Review Request: GLiv - OpenGL image viewer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611221516.kAMFGVgq006734@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: GLiv - OpenGL image viewer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216755 ------- Additional Comments From lemenkov at gmail.com 2006-11-22 10:16 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > ----------------------------------------------------------- > //usr/share/applications/fedora-gliv.desktop: warning: > Categories values must be one of > (found "Application") > > //usr/share/applications/fedora-gliv.desktop: warning: > Categories values must be one of > > (found "X-Red-Hat-Base") > ----------------------------------------------------------- > The category 'Application' and 'X-Red-Hat-Base' is no > longer used (since desktop-file-utils 0.11) and this > should be removed. > > NOTE: These warnings can be seem only in FC-devel. Which cateories should I use in this case? > * Scriptlets requirements: > Please check > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets > * desktop-database > - fedora-gliv.desktop has MimeType and this requires > 'update-desktop-database'. Done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 22 15:34:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 10:34:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216755] Review Request: GLiv - OpenGL image viewer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611221534.kAMFYMNc008358@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: GLiv - OpenGL image viewer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216755 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-11-22 10:34 EST ------- (In reply to comment #6) > (In reply to comment #4) > > > The category 'Application' and 'X-Red-Hat-Base' is no > > longer used (since desktop-file-utils 0.11) and this > > should be removed. > > > > NOTE: These warnings can be seem only in FC-devel. > > > Which cateories should I use in this case? Categories should be: ---------------------------------------- Categories=GNOME;Graphics; ---------------------------------------- I forgot one more comment. --------------------------------------- Icon=redhat-graphics.png --------------------------------------- This is incorrect because redhat-graphics.png is not installed by this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 22 15:46:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 10:46:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216755] Review Request: GLiv - OpenGL image viewer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611221546.kAMFkHcU009646@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: GLiv - OpenGL image viewer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216755 ------- Additional Comments From lemenkov at gmail.com 2006-11-22 10:46 EST ------- (In reply to comment #7) > > Which cateories should I use in this case? > > Categories should be: > ---------------------------------------- > Categories=GNOME;Graphics; > ---------------------------------------- OK. > I forgot one more comment. > --------------------------------------- > Icon=redhat-graphics.png > --------------------------------------- > This is incorrect because redhat-graphics.png is not installed > by this package. I changed it to: Icon=gliv.png Unfortunately (Fortunately!) I don't use pretty-looking modern software such as Gnome or KDE, so I can't check all that desktop stuff ) ver. 1.9.6-2 http://lemenkov.newmail.ru/SPECS/gliv.spec http://lemenkov.newmail.ru/SRPMS/gliv-1.9.6-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 22 15:46:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 10:46:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216785] Review Request: perl-Gnome2-Print - Perl wrappers for the Gnome Print utilities In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611221546.kAMFkPPm009694@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Gnome2-Print - Perl wrappers for the Gnome Print utilities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216785 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-11-22 10:46 EST ------- Imported and building for devel; branches requested for FC5,6. Thanks for the review! :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 22 15:46:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 10:46:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216755] Review Request: GLiv - OpenGL image viewer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611221546.kAMFkwYS009826@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: GLiv - OpenGL image viewer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216755 ------- Additional Comments From lemenkov at gmail.com 2006-11-22 10:46 EST ------- Oops. http://lemenkov.newmail.ru/SRPMS/gliv-1.9.6-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 22 16:12:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 11:12:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215224] Review Request: gtk-murrine-engine - Murrine GTK2 engine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611221612.kAMGCL5b013346@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtk-murrine-engine - Murrine GTK2 engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215224 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-11-22 11:12 EST ------- Well, * By the way, what is the license of the themes you included in srpm? Would you ask upstream about this? * Also, will you ask upsteam as of the update plan of themes? * Changelog: - version-release (0.31-4) and Changelog (0.31-3) is incoherent. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 22 16:25:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 11:25:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214893] Review Request: sipp - SIP test tool / traffic generator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611221625.kAMGPWoB014614@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sipp - SIP test tool / traffic generator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214893 ------- Additional Comments From jeff at ocjtech.us 2006-11-22 11:25 EST ------- Any updates? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 22 16:44:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 11:44:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216105] Review Request: python-twisted-web - Twisted web server, programmable in Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611221644.kAMGiJT2016237@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-twisted-web - Twisted web server, programmable in Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216105 paul at city-fan.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |paul at city-fan.org OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-11-22 11:44 EST ------- Review ====== - package and spec file naming OK - package meets guidelines - license is MIT, matches spec - spec file written in English and is legible - sources match upstream - package builds OK in mock for FC4-Rawhide, i386 and x86_64 - BR's OK - no locale issues - no shared libraries - not relocatable - no directory ownership or permissions issues - %clean section present and correct - macro usage consistent enough - code, not content - docs aren't excessively large - docs don't affect runtime - no subpackages - no devel files present - not a GUI app, no desktop file needed - package seems to work OK (tested with bittorrent 5.0.1) MUSTFIX: * Include LICENSE as %doc PROBLEM: # rpm -qa python-twisted\* python-twisted-web-0.6.0-4.fc6 python-twisted-core-2.4.0-4.fc6 # rpm -e python-twisted-web Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/libexec/twisted-dropin-cache", line 16, in ? list(getPlugins(IPlugin)) --- --- File "/usr/lib64/python2.4/site-packages/twisted/plugin.py", line 214, in getPlugins adapted = interface(plugin, None) File "/usr/lib64/python2.4/site-packages/zope/interface/interface.py", line 658, in __call__ adapter = conform(self) File "/usr/lib64/python2.4/site-packages/twisted/plugin.py", line 77, in __conform__ return self.load() File "/usr/lib64/python2.4/site-packages/twisted/plugin.py", line 72, in load return namedAny(self.dropin.moduleName + '.' + self.name) File "/usr/lib64/python2.4/site-packages/twisted/python/reflect.py", line 370, in namedAny obj = getattr(obj, n) exceptions.AttributeError: 'module' object has no attribute 'twisted_web' I think that needs fixing. NOTES: * rpmlint output: E: python-twisted-web no-binary This is to be expected for what is essentially a noarch package that has to live in an arch-specific place due to the way python works, i.e. not an issue SUGGESTIONS: * URL should be: http://twistedmatrix.com/trac/wiki/TwistedWeb * Include NEWS as %doc -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 22 17:14:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 12:14:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216912] New: Review Request: rtpproxy - A symmetric RTP proxy Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216912 Summary: Review Request: rtpproxy - A symmetric RTP proxy Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jeff at ocjtech.us QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://repo.ocjtech.us/misc/fedora/6/SRPMS/rtpproxy-0.3-1.fc6.spec SRPM URL: http://repo.ocjtech.us/misc/fedora/6/SRPMS/rtpproxy-0.3-1.fc6.src.rpm Description: This is a symmetric RTP proxy designed to be used in conjunction with the SIP Express Router (SER) or any other SIP proxy capable of rewriting SDP bodies in SIP messages that it processes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 22 17:22:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 12:22:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216755] Review Request: GLiv - OpenGL image viewer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611221722.kAMHMo7a020257@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: GLiv - OpenGL image viewer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216755 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-11-22 12:22 EST ------- Okay. --------------------------------------------- This package (gliv) is APPROVED by me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 22 17:37:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 12:37:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216916] New: Review Request: arpack - Fortran77 subroutines for solving large scale eigenvalue problems Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216916 Summary: Review Request: arpack - Fortran77 subroutines for solving large scale eigenvalue problems Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rpm at greysector.net QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://rpm.greysector.net/extras/arpack.spec SRPM URL: http://rpm.greysector.net/extras/arpack-2.1-1.src.rpm Description: ARPACK is a collection of Fortran77 subroutines designed to solve large scale eigenvalue problems. The package is designed to compute a few eigenvalues and corresponding eigenvectors of a general n by n matrix A. It is most appropriate for large sparse or structured matrices A where structured means that a matrix-vector product w <- Av requires order n rather than the usual order n**2 floating point operations. This software is based upon an algorithmic variant of the Arnoldi process called the Implicitly Restarted Arnoldi Method (IRAM). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 22 18:18:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 13:18:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 184530] Review Request: perl-RPM2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611221818.kAMIIHQU024665@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-RPM2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=184530 ------- Additional Comments From rnorwood at redhat.com 2006-11-22 13:18 EST ------- Turns out that there are/were a couple of existing bugs with this package. I haven't verified if they are still bugs with the latest version yet. bugzilla #73921 - packaging issue bugzilla #129724 - perl-RPM2 can't install multiple packages in a single transaction. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 22 18:26:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 13:26:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216534] Review Request: gocr - GNU Optical Character Recognition program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611221826.kAMIQJrS025435@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gocr - GNU Optical Character Recognition program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216534 ------- Additional Comments From orion at cora.nwra.com 2006-11-22 13:26 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > In files, the de file could be marked as: > %lang(de) %doc READMEde.txt Done. > There is a gtk frontend, maybe it could be shipped in a sub-package? Done. > There is a missing dependency on wish. I also think that maybe it > could make sense to have gocr-tcl for gocr.tcl, because of that > requires? Done. > There are many Requires missing. At least (in pnm.c), > gzip, bzip2, transfig, netpbm-progs, libjpeg > Maybe upstream could use convert... I'm wondering whether to make these hard Requires or not. Obviously you need some to get extra functionality, but only for the image types you need to process. Perhaps just a note in the description? The problem at the moment with using convert is that you would need a command like: convert pnm:-, but the code expects to append the filename to the end of the command. The more I look at the code, the less I like it, but I suppose it's developing and may be useful. Just need the new spec file: http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/gocr.spec http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/gocr-0.41-2.fc6.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 22 18:36:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 13:36:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 202528] Review Request: rt2x00-kmod In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611221836.kAMIaKSq026649@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rt2x00-kmod https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202528 ------- Additional Comments From linville at redhat.com 2006-11-22 13:36 EST ------- FWIW, I have included a d80211 patch in my FC6 test kernels: http://people.redhat.com/linville/kernels/fc6/ This is not directly related to packaging, but it might be interesting to anyone stumbling upon this bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 22 18:40:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 13:40:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215256] Review Request: firefox-32 - Alternate Launcher for 32bit Firefox In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611221840.kAMIeX3A027087@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: firefox-32 - Alternate Launcher for 32bit Firefox https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215256 ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2006-11-22 13:40 EST ------- http://togami.com/~warren/fedora/firefox-32-0.0.1-2.src.rpm http://togami.com/~warren/fedora/firefox-32.spec Changed the patch files into source files. I will just be careful when doing the import to check the source files in instead of putting them into the binary cache. I believe that was the only thing possible to fix in this package. So please either suggest further fixes or approve. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 22 18:42:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 13:42:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215165] Review Request: audacious-plugins - Plugins for the Audacious media player In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611221842.kAMIgv8W027381@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: audacious-plugins - Plugins for the Audacious media player https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215165 ------- Additional Comments From redhat-bugzilla at camperquake.de 2006-11-22 13:42 EST ------- It's at the same place all the other versions were, posted several times though this review. I thought that was kind of evident. http://www.skytale.net/files/audacious/audacious-plugins-1.2.2-0.8.sky.src.rpm http://www.skytale.net/files/audacious/audacious-plugins.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 22 18:50:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 13:50:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216916] Review Request: arpack - Fortran77 subroutines for solving large scale eigenvalue problems In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611221850.kAMIoL3X027987@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: arpack - Fortran77 subroutines for solving large scale eigenvalue problems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216916 Jochen at herr-schmitt.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |Jochen at herr-schmitt.de ------- Additional Comments From Jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2006-11-22 13:50 EST ------- God: + Source package was not complainted by rpmlint. * Local build works fine. * Rpmlint is quited on binary packages. * Local install/uninstall workds ok. * Tarball matches with upstream. * Mock build works fine. Bad: - Devel package should contains some documentation for developers. I thins, that the stuff on /usr/doc/arpack-2.1/EXAMPLES shold be in the developement package. - Rpmlint complaints on installed package: rpmlint arpack W: arpack undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libarpack.so.2.1 etime_ W: arpack undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libarpack.so.2.1 slamch_ W: arpack undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libarpack.so.2.1 cgemv_ W: arpack undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libarpack.so.2.1 cscal_ --- A lot of simular lines --- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 22 18:55:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 13:55:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 198562] Review Request: zabbix - Open-source monitoring solution for your IT infrastructure In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611221855.kAMItfDI028305@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: zabbix - Open-source monitoring solution for your IT infrastructure https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198562 jwilson at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From jwilson at redhat.com 2006-11-22 13:55 EST ------- Imported and built for devel, FC6 and FC5. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 22 19:11:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 14:11:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 209260] Review Request: beryl-manager - Beryl window decorator and theme management utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611221911.kAMJBjev029773@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: beryl-manager - Beryl window decorator and theme management utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209260 ------- Additional Comments From mr.ecik at gmail.com 2006-11-22 14:11 EST ------- (In reply to comment #17) > Whoops, yes, been meaning to address that, its still on my todo list. I need to dig up a high(er) resolution > beryl icon and throw it in there. I found beryl .svg icon here: http://tinyurl.com/y6xg3e and it seems to me that it may come in useful :) (In reply to comment #17) > I also still need to > look into the po/mo files being created... I have checked it and I found that: * tr_TR is Turkish * gl_ES is Gallegan (Spain) * sk_SK is Slovakian * sv_FI is Swedish (Finland) These languages dirs without doubt should be owned by another packages, but (I checked it) they aren't. ar_AR is probably Arabic but no idea what my_MY is. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 22 19:12:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 14:12:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214893] Review Request: sipp - SIP test tool / traffic generator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611221912.kAMJCdOK029939@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sipp - SIP test tool / traffic generator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214893 ------- Additional Comments From lemenkov at gmail.com 2006-11-22 14:12 EST ------- Yes, there are some. First, I updated packate to version 1.1rc6. So far I faced the "correct numbering" problem - 1.1rc6 isn't a correct name. Should we name it in some different manner, for example 1.1-0.rc6.1? Another one thing worth to mention is a clause in LICENSE.txt. Looks like some part of package distributed covered by different license (BSD variant?). I added another two BR: openssl-devel and libpcap-devel (they're significantly increase functionality, for example digest authentication in scenarios). Another one add-on is patch which fixes this package's buildscripts. http://lemenkov.newmail.ru/SPECS/sipp.spec http://lemenkov.newmail.ru/SRPMS/sipp-1.1rc6-0.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 22 19:15:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 14:15:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216755] Review Request: GLiv - OpenGL image viewer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611221915.kAMJFK1Z030128@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: GLiv - OpenGL image viewer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216755 lemenkov at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From lemenkov at gmail.com 2006-11-22 14:15 EST ------- Thanks. Successfully built in FE-Devel -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 22 19:33:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 14:33:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 209260] Review Request: beryl-manager - Beryl window decorator and theme management utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611221933.kAMJXDkM031619@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: beryl-manager - Beryl window decorator and theme management utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209260 ------- Additional Comments From sertacyildiz at gmail.com 2006-11-22 14:33 EST ------- (In reply to comment #18) > I have checked it and I found that: > * tr_TR is Turkish tr_TR is for turkish but the translation catalogs for turkish is named tr and installed under /usr/share/locale/tr/ which is owned by filesystem rpm. I guess xx_XX should be renamed to xx and for other translation catalogs directories should be owned. But I'm not sure about the standards of this naming scheme as filesystem installs both fr and fr_FR directories (although on my system only beryl/emerald packages consume the latter). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 22 19:42:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 14:42:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 209260] Review Request: beryl-manager - Beryl window decorator and theme management utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611221942.kAMJgmar032254@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: beryl-manager - Beryl window decorator and theme management utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209260 ------- Additional Comments From jwilson at redhat.com 2006-11-22 14:42 EST ------- Just pushed a new beryl-manager build with a desktop file added, still need to address the lang stuff. I noticed the same thing -- that some of the xx_XX ones looked like they could simply be renamed to xx, but not sure what's up with the others. Looks like I'll need to talk with the owner of filesystem and/or our translation folks... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 22 20:20:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 15:20:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216947] New: Review Request: perl-Gtk2-Notify - Gtk2::Notify Perl module Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216947 Summary: Review Request: perl-Gtk2-Notify - Gtk2::Notify Perl module Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Gtk2-Notify/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com SRPM URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-Gtk2-Notify-0.02-1.fc6.src.rpm SPEC URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-Gtk2-Notify.spec Description: Perl bindings to libnotify. This module will allow one to use the notify functionality from within a perl application. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 22 20:20:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 15:20:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216947] Review Request: perl-Gtk2-Notify - Gtk2::Notify Perl module In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611222020.kAMKKkf8002262@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Gtk2-Notify - Gtk2::Notify Perl module https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216947 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |163776 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 22 20:21:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 15:21:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216285] Review Request: kleansweep - Reclaim disk space by finding unneeded files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611222021.kAMKLVdb002327@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kleansweep - Reclaim disk space by finding unneeded files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216285 cgoorah at yahoo.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 22 20:24:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 15:24:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216284] Review Request: dd2 - Dodgin' Diamond 2 - Shoot'em up arcade game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611222024.kAMKOopZ002543@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dd2 - Dodgin' Diamond 2 - Shoot'em up arcade game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216284 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-11-22 15:24 EST ------- Thanks for the review and the NVidea headsup! Imported and build, closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 22 20:24:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 15:24:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216947] Review Request: perl-Gtk2-Notify - Gtk2::Notify Perl module In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611222024.kAMKOx7o002558@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Gtk2-Notify - Gtk2::Notify Perl module https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216947 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-11-22 15:24 EST ------- Tests now conditionalized -- they tend to die horribly under mock due to the lack of $DISPLAY. SRPM URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-Gtk2-Notify-0.02-2.fc6.src.rpm SPEC URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-Gtk2-Notify.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 22 20:50:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 15:50:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 191218] Review Request: PyScript - Postscript graphics with Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611222050.kAMKobo6005173@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PyScript - Postscript graphics with Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191218 ------- Additional Comments From paultcochrane at gmail.com 2006-11-22 15:50 EST ------- Kevin, Thanks for your comments, and many apologies for not having replied sooner. To be totally honest I didn't know what to say, and have only just got around to cleaning up my inbox. Basically, what I would like to do is to get PyScript into FedoraExtras but not necessarily be the actual maintainer of the package, rather stay the upstream author. Is there another way to do this other than getting sponsored? It would be fantastic to get the package into Fedora so that more people have access to the package. Is it possible to find someone else who already packages similar software for FedoraExtras who would be able to perfom this role? Thanks heaps in advance, Paul -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 22 21:21:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 16:21:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 209260] Review Request: beryl-manager - Beryl window decorator and theme management utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611222121.kAMLLYFo007083@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: beryl-manager - Beryl window decorator and theme management utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209260 ------- Additional Comments From mr.ecik at gmail.com 2006-11-22 16:21 EST ------- (In reply to comment #20) > Just pushed a new beryl-manager build with a desktop file added, still need to > address the lang stuff. I noticed the same thing -- that some of the xx_XX ones > looked like they could simply be renamed to xx, but not sure what's up with the > others. It may be especially difficult with Swedish language, as there are Swedish Finland and Swedish Sweden language. In fact, I don't think the Swedish Finland is really needed ;) In my opinion these languages need to be updated in filesystem package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 22 21:45:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 16:45:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216916] Review Request: arpack - Fortran77 subroutines for solving large scale eigenvalue problems In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611222145.kAMLjgaI009046@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: arpack - Fortran77 subroutines for solving large scale eigenvalue problems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216916 ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2006-11-22 16:45 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > Bad: > - Devel package should contains some documentation for developers. > I thins, that the stuff on /usr/doc/arpack-2.1/EXAMPLES shold be in > the developement package. Done, new specfile: http://rpm.greysector.net/extras/arpack.spec (SRPM unchanged) > - Rpmlint complaints on installed package: It doesn't here (FC6). > rpmlint arpack > W: arpack undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libarpack.so.2.1 etime_ > W: arpack undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libarpack.so.2.1 slamch_ > W: arpack undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libarpack.so.2.1 cgemv_ > W: arpack undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libarpack.so.2.1 cscal_ > --- A lot of simular lines --- I have no idea what this is about. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 22 21:57:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 16:57:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216916] Review Request: arpack - Fortran77 subroutines for solving large scale eigenvalue problems In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611222157.kAMLvl5v010021@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: arpack - Fortran77 subroutines for solving large scale eigenvalue problems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216916 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pertusus at free.fr ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-11-22 16:57 EST ------- It seems to be a duplicate of #214967 so it should certainly be better to add a comment on that report. The symbols look like lapack symbols. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 22 21:58:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 16:58:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216916] Review Request: arpack - Fortran77 subroutines for solving large scale eigenvalue problems In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611222158.kAMLwfpM010134@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: arpack - Fortran77 subroutines for solving large scale eigenvalue problems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216916 ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2006-11-22 16:58 EST ------- Scratch that, I have an idea now. Stay tuned. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 22 22:01:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 17:01:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216916] Review Request: arpack - Fortran77 subroutines for solving large scale eigenvalue problems In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611222201.kAMM1XRO010259@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: arpack - Fortran77 subroutines for solving large scale eigenvalue problems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216916 ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2006-11-22 17:01 EST ------- Aw, crap. I forgot about #214967. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 22 22:16:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 17:16:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215444] Review Request: netcdf-perl Perl extension module for scientific data access via the netCDF API In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611222216.kAMMGV1P010989@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: netcdf-perl Perl extension module for scientific data access via the netCDF API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215444 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-11-22 17:16 EST ------- I am not sure about the name. Maybe you could add a virtual Provides: perl-NetCDF = %{version}-%{release} It is not obvious since there is already the perl(NetCDF) provides. I've just reread the naming guidelines, and it may be interpreted as acceptable to keep netcdf-perl since it is not a CPAN module. * Rpmlint output may be ignored: W: netcdf-perl invalid-license NetCDF W: netcdf-perl invalid-license NetCDF W: netcdf-perl doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/netcdf-perl-1.2.3/test.pl perl(strict) W: netcdf-perl doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/netcdf-perl-1.2.3/test.pl perl(warnings) W: netcdf-perl doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/netcdf-perl-1.2.3/test.pl /usr/bin/perl W: netcdf-perl-debuginfo invalid-license NetCDF * license is not OSI compatible, but upstream has agreed to relicense using an OSI compatible license * follow packaging guidelines * source match upstream 936c91794d82ff8cfe2a955d4cad4c27 netcdf-perl-1.2.3.tar.Z * sane provides (with the classical bogus NetCDF.so) Provides: NetCDF.so perl(NetCDF) * %files section right. The naming is not obviously right, and not obviously wrong either, so I won't make it a blocker. If other reviewer disagree we'll see then, but in the meantime, it is APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 22 22:19:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 17:19:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216916] Review Request: arpack - Fortran77 subroutines for solving large scale eigenvalue problems In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611222219.kAMMJQ9v011133@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: arpack - Fortran77 subroutines for solving large scale eigenvalue problems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216916 ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2006-11-22 17:19 EST ------- OK, non-weak symbol issue fixed. http://rpm.greysector.net/extras/arpack.spec http://rpm.greysector.net/extras/arpack-2.1-2.src.rpm I will ask Axel if he would consider letting me (co-)maintain this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 22 22:24:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 17:24:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214967] Review Request: arpack - Fortran77 subroutines for solving large scale eigenvalue problems In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611222224.kAMMOjMd011601@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: arpack - Fortran77 subroutines for solving large scale eigenvalue problems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214967 ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2006-11-22 17:24 EST ------- I forgot about this and submitted this package for review in #bug 216916 myself, sorry. Axel, would you consider letting me maintain this or at least co-maintain? Here's a patch to fix undefined-non-weak-symbols rpmlint warning. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 22 22:26:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 17:26:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214967] Review Request: arpack - Fortran77 subroutines for solving large scale eigenvalue problems In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611222226.kAMMQajr011843@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: arpack - Fortran77 subroutines for solving large scale eigenvalue problems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214967 ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2006-11-22 17:26 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=141957) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=141957&action=view) Fix undefined-non-weak-symbols rpmlint warning and add license text to the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 22 22:27:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 17:27:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216916] Review Request: arpack - Fortran77 subroutines for solving large scale eigenvalue problems In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611222227.kAMMRrJV011948@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: arpack - Fortran77 subroutines for solving large scale eigenvalue problems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216916 rpm at greysector.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2006-11-22 17:27 EST ------- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 214967 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 22 22:28:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 17:28:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214967] Review Request: arpack - Fortran77 subroutines for solving large scale eigenvalue problems In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611222228.kAMMSFcA011978@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: arpack - Fortran77 subroutines for solving large scale eigenvalue problems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214967 ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2006-11-22 17:27 EST ------- *** Bug 216916 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 22 22:28:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 17:28:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215444] Review Request: netcdf-perl Perl extension module for scientific data access via the netCDF API In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611222228.kAMMSkp3012026@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: netcdf-perl Perl extension module for scientific data access via the netCDF API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215444 orion at cora.nwra.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From orion at cora.nwra.com 2006-11-22 17:28 EST ------- Added the provides perl-NetCDF. Imported and built on devel. Added to owners.list. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 22 22:29:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 17:29:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215445] Review Request: netcdf-decoder Converts WMO GRIB products into NetCDF files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611222229.kAMMT8jf012063@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: netcdf-decoder Converts WMO GRIB products into NetCDF files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215445 Bug 215445 depends on bug 215444, which changed state. Bug 215444 Summary: Review Request: netcdf-perl Perl extension module for scientific data access via the netCDF API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215444 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 22 22:52:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 17:52:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216534] Review Request: gocr - GNU Optical Character Recognition program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611222252.kAMMqFEU012995@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gocr - GNU Optical Character Recognition program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216534 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-11-22 17:52 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > > There are many Requires missing. At least (in pnm.c), > > gzip, bzip2, transfig, netpbm-progs, libjpeg > > I'm wondering whether to make these hard Requires or not. Obviously you need > some to get extra functionality, but only for the image types you need to > process. Perhaps just a note in the description? It depends how it fails. But given what those deps are, except maybe for transfig, I can't see why they couldn't be hard requires. png, jpeg, gif and eps support seems to be a must to me. I tested a bit, but I get only segfaults on non pnm files (tried png and eps): $ gocr ex.pcx Special chars: ??__??? ? ? ? ? &$Xgo ??44t>?? Special chars= ???????? ? ? ? ? &$XO_o ??44 _>_? Special chars : ???????? ? ? _ _ G_#9o 0?44>>t? $ convert ex.pcx ex.png $ gocr ex.png pngtopnm: warning - non-square pixels; to fix do a 'pamscale -yscale 4.28479' Erreur de segmentation $ gdb --args gocr ex.png .... (gdb) run Starting program: /usr/bin/gocr ex.png pngtopnm: warning - non-square pixels; to fix do a 'pamscale -yscale 4.28479' Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. 0x00aebf18 in pnm_readpaminit () from /usr/lib/libnetpbm.so.10 (gdb) bt #0 0x00aebf18 in pnm_readpaminit () from /usr/lib/libnetpbm.so.10 #1 0x080a0560 in readpgm (name=0xbfbc6a06 "ex.png", p=0xbfbbc2cc, vvv=0) at pnm.c:149 #2 0x080493b9 in main (argn=2, argv=0xbfbc5464) at gocr.c:272 #3 0x0082ce5c in __libc_start_main () from /lib/libc.so.6 #4 0x08048e01 in _start () With gziped or bzip2ed files, things are not better: $ gzip ex.pcx $ gocr ex.pcx.gz ERROR pcx.c L28: no ZSoft sign Another issue is that in gocr.tcl, the show button seems to invoke a program which isn't installed. There is an error with couldn't execute "xli": no such file or directory similarly with spell couldn't execute "tkispell": no such file or directory and with scan it starts xsane, so there is a missing dependency. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 22 23:36:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 18:36:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214830] Review Request: Limph - PHP network host monitor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611222336.kAMNa39u014591@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Limph - PHP network host monitor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214830 ------- Additional Comments From orion at cora.nwra.com 2006-11-22 18:36 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=141960) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=141960&action=view) patch to spec file Here's a patch that resolves some issues. To fix the tar ball issue: %setup -q -n %{name} Then go back to %setup -q when you fix that. Other issues: - still got some config files in /usr. See my earlier suggestion about maybe having them include the password information from a common file in /etc/limph. - tmp dir is still wrong. Do you really need your own tmp dir? Can't be in /usr in any case. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 22 23:59:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 18:59:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214967] Review Request: arpack - Fortran77 subroutines for solving large scale eigenvalue problems In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611222359.kAMNxobb015269@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: arpack - Fortran77 subroutines for solving large scale eigenvalue problems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214967 ------- Additional Comments From Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net 2006-11-22 18:59 EST ------- Thanks for the lapack patch and of course for the troublesome license inclusion, I'll bump the release tag and add a changelog entry like %changelog * Thu Nov 23 2006 Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski - 2.1-5 - Fix missing lapack dependencies. - Add RiceBSD license text. No problem with comaintaining. Let's hope that packages makes it through the license barrier, e.g. the authors grant a different license than the current one (thanks to Quentin for picking this up). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 23 00:00:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 19:00:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216534] Review Request: gocr - GNU Optical Character Recognition program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611230000.kAN007LI015303@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gocr - GNU Optical Character Recognition program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216534 ------- Additional Comments From orion at cora.nwra.com 2006-11-22 19:00 EST ------- Added Requires for those things we ship. We don't ship xli or tkispell though. So, change to equivalent apps we do ship or forget about them? Worry about the segfault, or just report upstream? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 23 00:14:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 19:14:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214967] Review Request: arpack - Fortran77 subroutines for solving large scale eigenvalue problems In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611230014.kAN0ELx4015949@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: arpack - Fortran77 subroutines for solving large scale eigenvalue problems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214967 ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2006-11-22 19:14 EST ------- Let's hope so! :) Another thing worth mentioning: I actually built arpack against atlas-devel, which provides an alternative lapack implementation, but since it doesn't provide lapack-devel, I decided to stick to lapack-devel. The user can replace lapack with atlas at install time. In fact, I wonder what yum will pick to satisfy lapack.so.3 dependency... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 23 00:15:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 19:15:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 207839] Review Request: lush - An object-oriented Lisp interpreter and compiler In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611230015.kAN0F9Ov015992@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lush - An object-oriented Lisp interpreter and compiler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207839 ------- Additional Comments From gemi at bluewin.ch 2006-11-22 19:15 EST ------- Here is the latest version: http://math.ifi.unizh.ch/fedora/6/i386/SRPMS.gemi/lush-1.2.1-1.fc6.src.rpm I fixed the compiler flags and some file permissions. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 23 01:10:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 20:10:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213902] Review Request: tclparser - Tcl syntax parser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611230110.kAN1AKAE017456@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tclparser - Tcl syntax parser Alias: tclparser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213902 ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2006-11-22 20:10 EST ------- ping? It's been almost 3 weeks since you assigned this review to yourself, but there hasn't been any activity yet. If you aren't able to do a review in the next couple of days then could you unassign yourself from this review so that someone else might take it over? The same goes for the related bugs 213904, 213905, and 213907. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 23 01:38:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 20:38:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 208169] Review Request: python-twisted-core - An asynchronous networking framework written in Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611230138.kAN1cLgX018400@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-twisted-core - An asynchronous networking framework written in Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208169 ------- Additional Comments From thomas at apestaart.org 2006-11-22 20:38 EST ------- Re #21, that's one of the features mock removed when it forked off mach. With mach, you can ask it to build a set of spec files and it will figure out dependencies on its own. Anyway, still looking for a suggestion, if no suggestion in the next few days I will go with putting it in there. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 23 04:06:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 23:06:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216734] Review Request: gnome-compiz-manager - compiz configuration utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611230406.kAN46sXF024378@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-compiz-manager - compiz configuration utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216734 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-11-22 23:06 EST ------- when i restart system i am repeatedly getting bug buddy reporting bugs again and again. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 23 04:18:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 23:18:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215165] Review Request: audacious-plugins - Plugins for the Audacious media player In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611230418.kAN4Iq6F025070@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: audacious-plugins - Plugins for the Audacious media player https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215165 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-11-22 23:18 EST ------- Thanks APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 23 04:20:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 23:20:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216734] Review Request: gnome-compiz-manager - compiz configuration utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611230420.kAN4KDVD025209@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-compiz-manager - compiz configuration utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216734 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-11-22 23:20 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=141968) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=141968&action=view) This is bug report i got as soon as i restart system and gnome starts working -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 23 05:35:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2006 00:35:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216916] Review Request: arpack - Fortran77 subroutines for solving large scale eigenvalue problems In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611230535.kAN5ZpX8029449@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: arpack - Fortran77 subroutines for solving large scale eigenvalue problems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216916 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 23 06:59:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2006 01:59:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 208420] Review Request: conky - A system monitor for X originally based on the torsmo code In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611230659.kAN6x1JL000417@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: conky - A system monitor for X originally based on the torsmo code https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208420 ------- Additional Comments From miker5slow at grandecom.net 2006-11-23 01:59 EST ------- I am waiting on this for the next release, since I submitted the last package they released a 1.4.4 and the word I got from the devs in IRC the other day was that 1.4.5 was coming soon cause of some other bugs that have been reported. I am not going to sub package the vim and nano syntax files. I was thinking of including them with the docs and the sample config; how does this sound?? Patrice, if you think the audacious.pc is buggy maybe I shouldnt build the package to support it?? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 23 08:59:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2006 03:59:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 208169] Review Request: python-twisted-core - An asynchronous networking framework written in Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611230859.kAN8xe76004866@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-twisted-core - An asynchronous networking framework written in Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208169 ------- Additional Comments From giallu at gmail.com 2006-11-23 03:59 EST ------- My 2 cents here: if some breakage should happen because of missing pieces, we should start building _only_ to -devel, where breakage is at least tolerated (if not expected ;) ). When the chain is complete, start builds for FC-6 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 23 09:51:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2006 04:51:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 208169] Review Request: python-twisted-core - An asynchronous networking framework written in Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611230951.kAN9pgZ9009002@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-twisted-core - An asynchronous networking framework written in Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208169 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-11-23 04:51 EST ------- There shouldn't be any breakage until the python-twisted metapackage is released; I really don't see there being an issue with the other packages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 23 10:51:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2006 05:51:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216534] Review Request: gocr - GNU Optical Character Recognition program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611231051.kANAppFu012954@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gocr - GNU Optical Character Recognition program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216534 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-11-23 05:51 EST ------- Looking at tkispell on the web it doesn't seems to be maintained, and it is not obvious where upstream is. Looking at the gocr.tcl code, it looks like spellchecking involves putting a file named out01.txt in the current directory which is not cleaned up, and is the same file the output text is saved to in the default case... My opinion would be to disable this functionality. I did it simply by commenting out pack .abar.spell -side left I spotted another issue, the config file is found and written in the current directory, and not in $HOME! This is bad... Maybe we shouldn't ship gocr.tcl? It hasn't really be changed in 4 years. Testing a bit gtk-ocr, I found at least 2 bugs (a crash, and also at another point the files appeared but I couldn't convert them). It is saner with regard with the handling of config file, however the converted file is saved in a file with same name than input file with .txt appended without any possibility to override this, nor any explanation of where the converted file is saved to... The default image viewer here is display from ImageMagick. Looking at the cvs, it seems that it hasn't been changed in 6 years. My personal opinion is that those 2 frontends are too buggy and unmaintained to be shipped. Now regarding the segfault, I think it is problematic since it seems to me that support for widely used image formats (png, eps, jpeg) should be working in a shipped package. For devel it is not problematic, but for FC-6 and below I think this should be a must. Not supporting compressed images is not an issue in my opinion. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 23 11:00:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2006 06:00:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 208420] Review Request: conky - A system monitor for X originally based on the torsmo code In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611231100.kANB0cCA013474@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: conky - A system monitor for X originally based on the torsmo code https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208420 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-11-23 06:00 EST ------- (In reply to comment #14) > am not going to sub package the vim and nano syntax files. I was thinking of > including them with the docs and the sample config; how does this sound?? Sounds fine. > Patrice, if you think the audacious.pc is buggy maybe I shouldnt build the > package to support it?? No, it is not a blocker, building support for audacious is the right thing to do. The only downside of having bogus dependencies on sonames is that if those sonames change you'll have to rebuild conky even though it doesn't depend on those sonames (in that case audacious only depends on those sonames, and audacious only would have to be rebuilt). I am trying to popularise this issue such that there are less bogus dependencies. Unneeded linking is detected by running ldd -u -r on installed apps and libraries. The solution is, in general, to use pkgconfig, and use the Requires.private and Libs.private right. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 23 14:42:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2006 09:42:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 198836] Review Request: freetype1 compatibility FreeType 1.x In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611231442.kANEgRhx023635@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: freetype1 compatibility FreeType 1.x https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198836 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-11-23 09:42 EST ------- Paul, many thanks for offering to review this, but it seems it has fallen through the cracks, anytime on a review soon? Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 23 16:22:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2006 11:22:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 211626] Review Request: xtide - Calculate tide all over the world In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611231622.kANGMXjP028123@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xtide - Calculate tide all over the world https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211626 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-11-23 11:22 EST ------- Now packages are updated. David, thank you for repackaing and improving xtide related packages. All the related srpms/rpms are under http://www.ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~mtasaka/dist/packages/xtide/ The following is a copy from the mail sent from David. --------------------------------------------------------- I made the following changes. xtide tarball: - To change the user and/or group under which xttpd tries to run (the defaults are nobody/nobody), set the variables xttpd_user and/or xttpd_group for configure. xttpd now exits if it cannot change to the specified user/group. bash-3.1$ xttpd_user=xttpd xttpd_group=xttpd ./configure You can also set the webmaster address for xttpd this way if you like. bash-3.1$ webmasteraddr="somebody at somewehere.else" ./configure - Instead of always barfing when HOME is unset, barf only when the need arises to write something to the home directory, and do without any config files that would normally be there. Setting HOME for xttpd thus becomes optional, eliminating a common source of confusion. tideEditor tarball: - Get name of TCD file to edit from command line instead of HFILE_PATH. - Check /etc/xtide.conf for WVS_PATH if environment variable is not set. - Provided icon-64x64.png for use with desktop environments. tcd-utils tarball: - Automaked and cleaned up without tideEditor. I was going to review the RPMs to see if I missed anything (it is not trivial since under Slackware we do not use RPMs) but I was unable to access http://www.ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~mtasaka/dist/packages/xtide/ when I tried this afternoon. So I downloaded the xttpd rc script from https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211626 (attached on 2006-10-26) and put this in the XTide tarball as scripts/Fedora/rc.xttpd. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Then: * For xttpd xttpd binary is still wrapped so that we change the enviroment needed by xttpd to arguments (which is needed for using 'daemon' function in /etc/rc.d/init.d/functions) * For tideEditor Now tideEditor take a tcd file as a argument, not environment. For launching tideEditor from GNOME Menu, we have to give one argument (tcd file) to tideEditor. So for GNOME/KDE Menu usage only I give a wrapper script for tideEditor (i.e. normally there is no need for tideEditor wrapper script so usually I don't call the script, only for GNOME/KDE menu usage). * Packaging: Now libtcd, xtide, tcd-utils, tideEditor are seperated. xtide, tcd-utils, tideEditor all require libtcd. Still I create small package 'xtide-common' which is required by xtide and tideEditor. xtide/xttpd package are unified. Perhaps at last I have to submit a new review request for libtcd, tcd-utils, tideEditor, however, before doing so I want to have a discussion on this bug report, especially for packaging issue. FILES: http://www.ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~mtasaka/dist/packages/xtide/SPECS/libtcd.spec http://www.ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~mtasaka/dist/packages/xtide/SPECS/tcd-utils.spec http://www.ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~mtasaka/dist/packages/xtide/SPECS/tideEditor.spec http://www.ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~mtasaka/dist/packages/xtide/SPECS/xtide.spec http://www.ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~mtasaka/dist/packages/xtide/SRPMS/libtcd-2.2-1.fc7.src.rpm http://www.ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~mtasaka/dist/packages/xtide/SRPMS/tcd-utils-20061120-1.fc7.src.rpm http://www.ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~mtasaka/dist/packages/xtide/SRPMS/tideEditor-1.3.12-1.fc7.src.rpm http://www.ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~mtasaka/dist/packages/xtide/SRPMS/xtide-2.9-0.1.date20061122.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 23 16:34:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2006 11:34:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214312] Review Request: xdms - Extracts Amiga DMS archives In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611231634.kANGYkQj028623@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xdms - Extracts Amiga DMS archives Alias: xdms https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214312 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |chris.stone at gmail.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | Alias| |xdms -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 23 16:35:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2006 11:35:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217066] New: Review Request: python-gpod - A python module to access iPod content Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217066 Summary: Review Request: python-gpod - A python module to access iPod content Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: tmz at pobox.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://pobox.com/~tmz/fedora/python-gpod.spec SRPM URL: http://pobox.com/~tmz/fedora/python-gpod-0.4.0-1.fc6.src.rpm Description: A python module to access iPod content. This module provides bindings to the libgpod library. This is my first package for FE, though I've been building rpms for a while now. Please see BZ 211648 for discussion of why this package is necessary. Note that it depends on libgpod-0.4.0 from development. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 23 16:36:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2006 11:36:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217066] Review Request: python-gpod - A python module to access iPod content In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611231636.kANGaVs9028872@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-gpod - A python module to access iPod content https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217066 tmz at pobox.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 23 16:53:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2006 11:53:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 210007] Review Request: - In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611231653.kANGrDxD029683@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210007 ------- Additional Comments From Nadia.Derbey at bull.net 2006-11-23 11:53 EST ------- (In reply to comment #16) > I think I was not specific enough. The thought is that it would be generic > enough that when build against a specific release - it would create an RPM > against that one. > > If I built under FC5, it would build a FC5-tunable package for the kernel that > is in FC5. and not a FC6 one. > > If I built it under FC6, it would build a FC-6-tunable package for the kernel > that is in FC6, and not a FC5 one. > > and so on. > > This would have to be generic enough so that when FC7 comes, there is no need to > alter the SPEC file. Or if it has to be done - just the minum if possible. > OK, I'm conviced > > In regards to your comment about "portability across distros" is a moot point. > This RPM/SPEC is specific for Fedora Core and RHEL. This spec file will not be > used by Novell/SuSE. Novell will have require their own .spec file, with > different fields. > Yeah! I know, that's what I have been fighting with these last days! What I meant here was not portability for the spec file, but for a binary linked with the libtune. > > I am not sure what you mean by "somebody downloading the kernel database". When > the RPM is installed, does it not include all the neccesary data? We have 1 rpm for the kernel data part and 1 rpm for the more distro-specific part. Ok I'll change everything and update the bug when I'm ready. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 23 16:54:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2006 11:54:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216947] Review Request: perl-Gtk2-Notify - Gtk2::Notify Perl module In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611231654.kANGsG8K029777@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Gtk2-Notify - Gtk2::Notify Perl module https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216947 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 23 17:23:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2006 12:23:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216544] Review Request: libdvdread - Simple foundation for reading DVD video disks In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611231723.kANHNZHc030823@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libdvdread - Simple foundation for reading DVD video disks https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216544 mr.ecik at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mr.ecik at gmail.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mr.ecik at gmail.com 2006-11-23 12:23 EST ------- MUST items: * rpmlint output: W: libdvdread-devel no-documentation * package is named well * spec file name is good * package meets Packaging Guideline * package is licensed with an GPL open-source compatible license * License field in spec file matches actual license * license file is included in %doc * md5sums are matching (078788c9241ae16763529e1235502337) * package successfully compiles on x86_64 * no locales * proper %post and %postun sections * not relocatable * package owns directories well * no duplicates in %files * every %files section includes %defattr * proper %clean section * macros used well * -devel subpackage created and looks good Package can be approved :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 23 17:35:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2006 12:35:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216734] Review Request: gnome-compiz-manager - compiz configuration utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611231735.kANHZBu2031217@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-compiz-manager - compiz configuration utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216734 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 23 17:35:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2006 12:35:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216535] Review Request: mp3gain - Lossless MP3 volume adjustment tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611231735.kANHZcCq031288@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mp3gain - Lossless MP3 volume adjustment tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216535 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-11-23 12:35 EST ------- Ok will take this for review -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 23 18:02:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2006 13:02:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214312] Review Request: xdms - Extracts Amiga DMS archives In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611231802.kANI2CgK032665@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xdms - Extracts Amiga DMS archives Alias: xdms https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214312 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2006-11-23 13:02 EST ------- ==== REVIEW CHECKLIST ==== O rpmlint output: E: xdms configure-without-libdir-spec This is because of a non-standard configure script. You should place a comment in the specfile indicating why you cannot set libdir. - package named according to package naming guidelines - spec filename matches %{name} - package meets packaging guidelines - package licensed as "Public Domain" This is not listed in the open source compatible licenses, but I assume it's valid for Fedora since rpmlint recognizes it. - License matches actual license, located in source files - no license in %doc because it just says "Public Domain" in the source files - spec file written in American english - spec file is legible - source match upstream f687a5beba88964ef0afd478efe99849 xdms-1.3.2.tar.bz2 - package successfully compiles and builds on FC6 x86_64 - all dependencies listed in BR - no locales - no shared libraries - package is not relocatable - package owns all directories it creates - no duplicates in %files - file permissions set properly - package has proper %clean section O macro usage is consistent Why not use %{opt_flags} instead of $RPM_OPT_FLAGS since you use %{buildroot}? - package contains code - no large documentation - %doc does not affect runtime - no header files or static libraries - no pkgconfig files - package does not require a devel subpackage - no .la files - package is not a GUI app - package does not own files or directories owned by other packages ** APPROVED ** ==== SHOULD ==== - Add comment above configure explaining why you cannot set libdir - Use %{optflags} instead of $RPM_OPT_FLAGS since you use %{buildroot} instead of $RPM_BUILD_ROOT. Not really necessary, but more consistent with your usage. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 23 18:21:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2006 13:21:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215256] Review Request: firefox-32 - Alternate Launcher for 32bit Firefox In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611231821.kANILWKj001050@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: firefox-32 - Alternate Launcher for 32bit Firefox Alias: firefox-32 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215256 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |chris.stone at gmail.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | Alias| |firefox-32 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 23 18:50:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2006 13:50:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215256] Review Request: firefox-32 - Alternate Launcher for 32bit Firefox In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611231850.kANIowdo001785@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: firefox-32 - Alternate Launcher for 32bit Firefox Alias: firefox-32 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215256 ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2006-11-23 13:50 EST ------- ==== REVIEW CHECKLIST ==== X rpmlint output: E: firefox-32 description-line-too-long If you have both 32bit /usr/lib and 64bit /usr/lib64 Firefox installed, the standard E: firefox-32 description-line-too-long /usr/bin/firefox launcher will run only the 64bit version. This launcher allows you E: firefox-32 description-line-too-long to choose to run the 32bit browser by running /usr/bin/firefox-32. Please be sure W: firefox-32 strange-permission setup-firefox-32.sh 0755 E: firefox-32 hardcoded-library-path in /usr/lib E: firefox-32 description-line-too-long If you have both 32bit /usr/lib and 64bit /usr/lib64 Firefox installed, the standard E: firefox-32 description-line-too-long /usr/bin/firefox launcher will run only the 64bit version. This launcher allows you E: firefox-32 description-line-too-long to choose to run the 32bit browser by running /usr/bin/firefox-32. Please be sure E: firefox-32 only-non-binary-in-usr-lib W: firefox-32 no-documentation W: firefox-32 one-line-command-in-%trigger /usr/lib64/firefox-32/setup-firefox-32.sh /tmp/firefox-32-0.0.1-2.fc6.x86_64.rpm.32469/usr/share/applications/firefox-32.desktop: warning: boolean key "Terminal" has value "0", boolean values should be "false" or "true", although "0" and "1" are allowed in this field for backwards compatibility /tmp/firefox-32-0.0.1-2.fc6.x86_64.rpm.32469/usr/share/applications/firefox-32.desktop: error: invalid characters in value of key "StartupNotify", boolean values must be "false" or "true" (found "True") E: firefox-32 invalid-desktopfile /tmp/firefox-32-0.0.1-2.fc6.x86_64.rpm.32469/usr/share/applications/firefox-32.desktop I suggest you remove /usr/lib paths from the description and make sure the lines are < 80 chars. Definately remove the warren togami rant in the description, it does not belong there, let's keep this professional. rpmlint is saying setup-firefox-32.sh should be in /usr/share not /usr/lib64 move this to /usr/share or else add a comment in spec file indicating why it should be in /usr/lib64 Fix desktop files so rpmlint likes them Single line trigger files seem okay to me, not sure why rpmlint warns about them - package named according to package naming guidelines - spec filename matches %{name} - package meets packaging guidelines - package licensed with open source compatible license O spec file matches actual license. I'm assuming since you are both the upstream author and packager this is the case. - license not packaged with source or included in %doc - written in American english - spec file legible O There is no upstream so I cannot verify source match, but since packager *is* upstream this is okay - package successfully compiles and builds on FC6 x86_64 X all build dependencies listed in BR (missing desktop-file-utils for Requires) - no locales - no shared libraries - package is not relocatable X package does not own all directories it creates - no duplicates in %files - file permissions set properly - package contains proper %clean section - macro usage consistent - contains code - no large documentation - no header files or static libraries - no pkgconfig files - package does not require a devel subpackage - does not contain .la files X .desktop file is not installed using desktop-file-install - package does not own files or directories owned by other packages ==== MUST ==== - shorten description to 80 chars in length - remove 2nd paragraph in description, instead place a comment in the spec file pointing to bug #214100 - investigate rpmlint strange permissions warning, consider using 775 instead of rpmlint likes that better - move shell script to /usr/share as rpmlint suggests, or if it must be in /usr/lib64 then add a comment in spec file indicating why - make rpmlint happy with .desktop file - install desktop files with desktop-file-install in %install - packages with .desktop files should Requires: desktop-file-utils - package must own the /usr/lib64/firefox-32/ directory if this is where the .sh files ultimately goes (see rpmlint warning indicating this file should go in /usr/share) ==== SHOULD ==== - remove paths /usr/lib etc. from description, it confuses rpmlint and they are not needed for the description - place comment above Source0 URL indicating that this is a shell script written by packager and there is no web location to find the script - Include copy of GPL license in %doc -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 23 19:57:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2006 14:57:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215256] Review Request: firefox-32 - Alternate Launcher for 32bit Firefox In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611231957.kANJv0Qq004185@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: firefox-32 - Alternate Launcher for 32bit Firefox Alias: firefox-32 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215256 ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2006-11-23 14:56 EST ------- - Why not use the firefox icon if firefox is a requirement? I think firefox.png would be better than redhat-web-browser.png - Why not use mozilla-firefox-32.desktop as the filename to be consistent with the firefox package? - Consider also using the mozilla-firefox.desktop file's Name, Generic Name and Comment fields to use as a template for the firefox32 .desktop file. I think the 32 bit version should have the same icon/description as the 64 bit version in order to make it consistent and easier to find. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 23 20:23:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2006 15:23:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216354] Review Request: liquidwar - Multiplayer wargame with liquid armies In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611232023.kANKNQGi004829@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: liquidwar - Multiplayer wargame with liquid armies https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216354 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-11-23 15:23 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) Thanks for review and the good feedback! > > SHOULD > ====== > * Consider adding the README file to %doc. It contains the address of the > package's mailing list which doesn't appear elsewhere. > Done > * 'make dep' gets run as part of the build, and generates the following > harmless warning: > gmake[1]: Entering directory `/space/rpmbuild/BUILD/liquidwar-5.6.3/src' > find: .-name: No such file or directory > find: *.c: No such file or directory > cc: no input files > gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/space/rpmbuild/BUILD/liquidwar-5.6.3/src' > It seems there is a missing space after the '.' in src/Makefile.in line 256: > @find .\ > -name '*.c' | \ > Harmless indeed, ignored. > * The man page refers the reader to "/usr/share/doc/liquidwar" for more > documentation. This path should be updated to point to the files in the > -doc subpackage. > Fixed > * The URL: tag points to a page with a better home page link: > http://www.ufoot.org/liquidwar/v5 > Done > * The metaserver URL in the man page is wrong. It should be: > http://www.ufoot.org/liquidwar/v5/metaserver > Fixed > * An init.d script for starting a liquidwar server at boot time would be nice. > Perhaps if I find some extra time I'll write one for you. > I wouldn't mind receiving this, together with a patch to split out the server in its own subpackage, as I think if we add an init script the server really should be in its own subpackage (and we need to think about wether to start it by default or not) > None of these issues are serious enough to block approval: > > APPROVED > Imported and build, closing. Thanks again! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 23 20:30:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2006 15:30:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216354] Review Request: liquidwar - Multiplayer wargame with liquid armies In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611232030.kANKUmmV004993@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: liquidwar - Multiplayer wargame with liquid armies https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216354 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 23 20:36:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2006 15:36:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 201418] Review Request: widelands - GPL Settlers II clone In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611232036.kANKaDpr005143@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: widelands - GPL Settlers II clone https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201418 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-11-23 15:36 EST ------- (In reply to comment #13) > The glob2 package is currently unbuildable due to changes on the freetype-devel > package on FC6. It looks like it now doesn't include the > '/usr/include/freetype2/freetype/internal' directory like it did before, and I > don't know how to fix that on the code to make a patch. Filed a bug report on > glob2's bugzilla since it shouldn't be using an internal header. I just tried with upstreams latest release 0.8.21 and that builds fine with the new freetype! Also please put glob2 commments in the glob2 review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 23 21:06:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2006 16:06:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 210553] Review Request: xerces-c - Validating XML Parser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611232106.kANL6sj5005825@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xerces-c - Validating XML Parser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210553 ------- Additional Comments From lemenkov at gmail.com 2006-11-23 16:06 EST ------- Added samples, finally. http://lemenkov.newmail.ru/SPECS/xerces-c.spec http://lemenkov.newmail.ru/SRPMS/xerces-c-2.7.0-4.src.rpm Unfortunately. rpmlint isn't silent now: [petro at Sulaco ppc]$ rpmlint * W: xerces-c-devel no-documentation E: xerces-c-doc script-without-shebang /usr/share/doc/xerces-c-doc-2.7.0/samples/configure.in E: xerces-c-doc script-without-shebang /usr/share/doc/xerces-c-doc-2.7.0/samples/config.h.in W: xerces-c-doc doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/xerces-c-doc-2.7.0/samples/config.guess /bin/sh W: xerces-c-doc doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/xerces-c-doc-2.7.0/samples/config.sub /bin/sh W: xerces-c-doc doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/xerces-c-doc-2.7.0/samples/configure /bin/sh W: xerces-c-doc doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/xerces-c-doc-2.7.0/samples/install-sh /bin/sh W: xerces-c-doc doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/xerces-c-doc-2.7.0/samples/runConfigure /bin/sh [petro at Sulaco ppc]$ We can simply remove all these executable scripts from docs, but it complicates building them (if anyone will). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 23 21:10:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2006 16:10:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 201418] Review Request: widelands - GPL Settlers II clone In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611232110.kANLAqpt005939@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: widelands - GPL Settlers II clone https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201418 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-11-23 16:10 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=142021) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=142021&action=view) PATCH: compile + 64 bit fixes for latest CVS About widelands, according to upstream a stable release is expected soon, so I would expect cvs to be in pretty good shape, maybe you just picked a bad date todo a checkout? I've taken a look at CVS from today and that needs the attached patch to compile and the patch also fixes some 64 bit issues. Please send this patch upstream. With this patch applied the checkmate and eleven forests maps both load fine, so I guess the crahs bug is fixed now. Please make a new srpm available for review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 23 21:13:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2006 16:13:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 210553] Review Request: xerces-c - Validating XML Parser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611232113.kANLDpw3006007@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xerces-c - Validating XML Parser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210553 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2006-11-23 16:13 EST ------- (In reply to comment #14) > E: xerces-c-doc script-without-shebang > /usr/share/doc/xerces-c-doc-2.7.0/samples/configure.in > E: xerces-c-doc script-without-shebang > /usr/share/doc/xerces-c-doc-2.7.0/samples/config.h.in These should be trivially fixed with something like chmod -x samples/{config.h,configure}.in in %prep. > We can simply remove all these executable scripts from docs A dependency on /bin/sh is not really a problem here IMO. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 23 21:59:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2006 16:59:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 174377] Review Request: gnu-smalltalk - GNU Smalltalk In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611232159.kANLxMf7007097@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnu-smalltalk - GNU Smalltalk https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174377 ------- Additional Comments From Jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2006-11-23 16:59 EST ------- There is a new prerlease of gnu-smalltalk which solved all the issue reported in this review SRPM: http://www.herr-schmitt.de/pub/gnu-smalltalk/gnu-smalltalk-2.2c-1.src.rpm SPEC: http://www.herr-schmitt.de/pub/gnu-smalltalk/gnu-smalltalk.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 23 22:13:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2006 17:13:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216519] Review Request: sdparm - List or change SCSI disk parameters In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611232213.kANMD3J9007466@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sdparm - List or change SCSI disk parameters https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216519 ------- Additional Comments From peter at thecodergeek.com 2006-11-23 17:13 EST ------- Okey dokey. Apologies for not getting to this sooner. Mock was being really weird last night. Let's get this party started (as the saying goes)... ---- ** MUST items ** GOOD: rpmlint is silent on the source and binary RPMs. GOOD: Package name and version follows the Naming Guidelines GOOD: The spec file matches the base package name: %{name}.spec GOOD: The package has an open-source compatible license (BSD) and meets the legal criteria for Fedora. The License tag in the spec file properly reflects this. GOOD: Spec file is written in American English and is legible (though I would align the tags at the top with spaces or tabs, but that's merely personal preference AFAIK, and definitely not a blocker in any way). GOOD: Source matches that of upstream. $ md5sum sdparm-1.00-*.tgz 1d46f85ed07e697f64fc40ddad31ddb5 sdparm-1.00-srpm.tgz 1d46f85ed07e697f64fc40ddad31ddb5 sdparm-1.00-upstream.tgz GOOD: Package successfully builds into binary RPMs on FC6/x86. GOOD: BuildRequires and Requires are correct.(The fact that they are not needed probably makes this a bit simpler. ^_^) GOOD: The %files section is okay. File and directory ownership does not conflict with system packages; and no duplicates are listed. The %defattr call is correct. GOOD: Package contains a %clean section, which consists of 'rm -rf %{buildroot}' GOOD: Macro usage is consistent. GOOD: Package contains code and permissible content. GOOD: %doc files do not affect runtime of program. ** SHOULD items ** GOOD: A copy of the license is included in the tarball as %doc ("COPYING"). GOOD: Package successfully builds in Mock for FC6 and Devel (both x86). GOOD: Packaged utility functions with no apparent errors or segfaults (tested with a WD Raptor SATA hard disk). ** Blockers ** BAD: The %changelog entries of those modifications before yours need to be made consistent with the Packaging Guidelines. See http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-b7d622f4bb245300199c6a33128acce5fb453213 for more information. BAD: The INSTALL file should not be packaged as %doc. Refer to http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-9bbfa57478f0460c6160947a6bf795249488182b for more info. ** Not Applicable ** N/A: The package does not require ExcludeArch semantics. N/A: The package does not require %find_lang semantics, since it installs no locales. N/A: The package does not require %post/%postun calls to /sbin/ldconfig, since it installs no shared libraries. N/A: Package is not relocatable. N/A: There is no large documentation, so a -doc subpackage is not needed. N/A: No header files, shared or static library files, so no -devel subpackage is needed. Package installs no libtool archives. N/A: The package contains no pkgconfig (.pc) files. N/A: Not a GUI application, so no .desktop file needed. N/A: The package does not use translations, so no translated %description or Summary tag is available. N/A: No scriplets are used. N/A: No subpackages exist, so worries about fully-versioned Requires for those are not present. ---- I cannot sponsor you, but looking through other review requests you've posted for eterm and such, I see that Ed Hill sponsored you in bug #182175; so I am able to APPROVE this once you fix these two blockers (assuming that his sponsorship still stands). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 23 22:28:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2006 17:28:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216519] Review Request: sdparm - List or change SCSI disk parameters In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611232228.kANMSNr2007739@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sdparm - List or change SCSI disk parameters https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216519 ------- Additional Comments From terjeros at phys.ntnu.no 2006-11-23 17:28 EST ------- > so I am > able to APPROVE this once you fix these two blockers (assuming that his > sponsorship still stands). Thanks, new files fixing %doc and changelog: SPEC: http://www.pvv.ntnu.no/~terjeros/rpms/sdparm/sdparm.spec SRPMS: http://www.pvv.ntnu.no/~terjeros/rpms/sdparm/sdparm-1.00-4.fc6.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 23 22:58:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2006 17:58:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 206238] Review Request: qdbm - Quick Database Manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611232258.kANMw33n008389@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qdbm - Quick Database Manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206238 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(tagoh at redhat.com) ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-11-23 17:57 EST ------- Again ping? I wait for one week before I close this bug as CLOSED FE-DEADREVIEW. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 23 23:02:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2006 18:02:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216519] Review Request: sdparm - List or change SCSI disk parameters In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611232302.kANN2HQM008505@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sdparm - List or change SCSI disk parameters https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216519 peter at thecodergeek.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From peter at thecodergeek.com 2006-11-23 18:02 EST ------- Good work. Those two issues are fixed and the rest is fine. This is therefore ACCEPTED. Please remember to close bug this as NEXTRELEASE once you've imported it into CVS and pushed it through the buildsystem. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 23 23:29:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2006 18:29:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216519] Review Request: sdparm - List or change SCSI disk parameters In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611232329.kANNTX7e009245@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sdparm - List or change SCSI disk parameters https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216519 ------- Additional Comments From peter at thecodergeek.com 2006-11-23 18:29 EST ------- "[...] to close bug this [...]" should be "to close this bug [...]" I need more caffeine apparently. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 24 00:10:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2006 19:10:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217066] Review Request: python-gpod - A python module to access iPod content In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611240010.kAO0A42B010040@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-gpod - A python module to access iPod content Alias: python-gpod-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217066 tmz at pobox.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |python-gpod-review -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 24 00:48:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2006 19:48:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 202528] Review Request: rt2x00-kmod In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611240048.kAO0mh4B010675@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rt2x00-kmod https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202528 ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2006-11-23 19:48 EST ------- Which command sould I use to grab the same version of the d80211 than the one you used in the "jwl" testing kernel? i grab the whole wireless-dev tree when trying to made a snapshot with a script... The main command was: git clone git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/linville/wireless-dev.git wireless-dev-$git Can i grab only d80211, bcm43xx(if your version is d80211 based not soft_mac!) and then rt2x00 witch is currently not in the wireless-dev tree for now! Maybe others ones are fine to be built with the d80211 stack (hostap, atmel or others?) I will try to take the tree last d80211 patches; and then see if i can replace the d80211 stack version included from rt2x00 with this one... does it sounds good? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 24 02:35:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2006 21:35:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216354] Review Request: liquidwar - Multiplayer wargame with liquid armies In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611240235.kAO2ZRok013091@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: liquidwar - Multiplayer wargame with liquid armies https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216354 ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2006-11-23 21:35 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > > * An init.d script for starting a liquidwar server at boot time would be nice. > > Perhaps if I find some extra time I'll write one for you. > > > > I wouldn't mind receiving this, together with a patch to split out the server in > its own subpackage, as I think if we add an init script the server really should > be in its own subpackage (and we need to think about wether to start it by > default or not) It most definitely should not be started by default. The server admin should have to run 'chkconfig liquidwar on' manually or use the gui service tools to enable the service to run at boot time. Certain system applications (like sshd) should be started by default, but games should not. I've got the necessary init/sysconfig/logrotate scripts for liquid war. Would you prefer that I attach them to a new bug report, or just check them into cvs (without requesting a build, of course)? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 24 02:36:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2006 21:36:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 202528] Review Request: rt2x00-kmod In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611240236.kAO2aeaK013140@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rt2x00-kmod https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202528 ------- Additional Comments From linville at redhat.com 2006-11-23 21:36 EST ------- The last commit before generating that patch: 39d58f9228dee66c22ce1b1d314c8012b892ea4d FWIW, the raw patch needed a little massaging before it would build on FC6. You may want to look at the patches from the fc6.jwltest kernels for inspiration. The d80211 tree has a number of drivers available, including bcm43xx, rt2x00 (look closer!), adm8211, and p54. Intel is supposed to make an ipw3945 driver available for d80211 "soon" as well. I would be happy to discuss a tagging regime for wireless-dev if that would facilitate packaging. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 24 03:07:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2006 22:07:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217100] New: Fn hotkey combinations do not function on Panasonic Toughbook CF-51 Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217100 Summary: Fn hotkey combinations do not function on Panasonic Toughbook CF-51 Product: Fedora Extras Version: fc6 Platform: i686 URL: http://www.netlab.cs.tsukuba.ac.jp/~yokota/izumi/panason ic_acpi/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jakethompson1 at gmail.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Description of problem: The function keys on the Panasonic Toughbook CF-51 are labeled for the following hotkeys, which in Fedora Core 6 have no effect: Fn-F1: increase screen brightness Fn-F2: decrease screen brightness Fn-F3: switch LCD or external monitor Fn-F4: mute sound Fn-F5: volume down Fn-F6: volume up Fn-F7: suspend to RAM Fn-F10: suspend to disk There is a kernel driver to turn these hotkeys into ACPI events, as well as a script to do the actual functions at http://www.netlab.cs.tsukuba.ac.jp/~yokota/izumi/panasonic_acpi/. There is an alternate version at http://www.da-cha.org/letsnote/. As of Nov. 23, 2006, there is no package in Fedora Core or Extras containing this driver or the utilities. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): Fedora Core 6 (i386) How reproducible: Attempt to use any of the Fn hotkey sequences Steps to Reproduce: 1. Press Fn-F1 (decrease screen brightness) Actual results: Nothing happens Expected results: Decreased screen brightness Additional info: The driver is labeled for Panasonic "Let's Note" laptops, but also works with the Toughbook (CF-51 at least). Resolution: Package request for pcc-acpi kernel module and associated utilities. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 24 03:16:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2006 22:16:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 212715] Review Request: openvrml - VRML/X3D runtime library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611240316.kAO3G0g7014381@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: openvrml - VRML/X3D runtime library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212715 braden at endoframe.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 24 04:21:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2006 23:21:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216947] Review Request: perl-Gtk2-Notify - Gtk2::Notify Perl module In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611240421.kAO4LPZv019539@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Gtk2-Notify - Gtk2::Notify Perl module https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216947 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-11-23 23:21 EST ------- I just had a look for Source URL and found given source download link is not working. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 24 04:25:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2006 23:25:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 200722] Review Request: GraphicsMagick In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611240425.kAO4P1oZ019938@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: GraphicsMagick https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200722 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-11-23 23:24 EST ------- Ping -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 24 04:26:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2006 23:26:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216535] Review Request: mp3gain - Lossless MP3 volume adjustment tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611240426.kAO4QJJ7020155@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mp3gain - Lossless MP3 volume adjustment tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216535 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-11-23 23:26 EST ------- err but did you dicuss this package inclusion on Fedora-extras list? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 24 04:35:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2006 23:35:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216535] Review Request: mp3gain - Lossless MP3 volume adjustment tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611240435.kAO4ZGLb021340@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mp3gain - Lossless MP3 volume adjustment tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216535 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-11-23 23:35 EST ------- (In reply to comment #11) > I suggest you better discuss on fedora-extras mailing list. Another idea is marking this bug as blocking FE-Legal (bug 182235) and asking Tom "spot" Callaway about this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 24 06:14:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2006 01:14:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216947] Review Request: perl-Gtk2-Notify - Gtk2::Notify Perl module In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611240614.kAO6EHse026684@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Gtk2-Notify - Gtk2::Notify Perl module https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216947 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-11-24 01:14 EST ------- Ok, that's weird. It is working from the by-authors perspective; I'll update the spec to use this one. http://search.cpan.org/CPAN/authors/id/F/FL/FLORA/Gtk2-Notify-0.02.tar.gz -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 24 06:36:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2006 01:36:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216354] Review Request: liquidwar - Multiplayer wargame with liquid armies In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611240636.kAO6aSMC027648@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: liquidwar - Multiplayer wargame with liquid armies https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216354 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-11-24 01:36 EST ------- Just dropping them in CVS will be fine, a specfile update for this would be very welcome too :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 24 08:27:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2006 03:27:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217066] Review Request: python-gpod - A python module to access iPod content In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611240827.kAO8RYuq031753@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-gpod - A python module to access iPod content Alias: python-gpod-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217066 ------- Additional Comments From tmz at pobox.com 2006-11-24 03:27 EST ------- Bah, I found 2 missing BuildRequires: gettext and perl(XML::Parser). I also removed pkgconfig as gtk2-devel already pulls it in. Spec URL: http://pobox.com/~tmz/fedora/python-gpod.spec SRPM URL: http://pobox.com/~tmz/fedora/python-gpod-0.4.0-2.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 24 09:43:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2006 04:43:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 211626] Review Request: xtide - Calculate tide all over the world In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611240943.kAO9hNGJ005132@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xtide - Calculate tide all over the world https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211626 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-11-24 04:43 EST ------- I have checked all the packages, everything seems right. Much thanks to David for changing his packages, now the packaging is much simpler. Hoping that it also profits to him... The recursive dependency issue is even sorted out as a side effect of rearranging the sources, and libtcd should be multilib. I have spotted those issues: * I think that libtcd qualifies for keeping the static library since it could be used to handle trusted data in numerical experiments where compiling statically enhance portability. You can keep it out, as long as you respond favorably to users asking to have it back. * /usr/libexec/tideEditor-desktop: line 30: [: too many arguments there is a -or instead of -o * in the latest line of xtide-README.fedora one should read /usr/share/xtide-harmonics instead of /usr/share/wvs-data. Also maybe administer should be changed to administrator. * tideEditor-desktop may be in %{_bindir} to avoid hardcoding /usr/lib/libexec in desktop file (since using %{_libexecdir} is not easy) * for the xttpd wrapper it is less easy to use properly the macro. Maybe a simple sed -e 's,/usr/libexec/,%{_libexecdir},' .... on the script would do the trick. * there are other hardcoded file path in the -common subpackage, but these ones are not problematic in my opinion since they are in clearly fedora packaging specific parts under our complete control. Now I think you should submit reviews for each package, I think that you can reuse your closed tickets or open new ones, at your will. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 24 09:57:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2006 04:57:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 211551] Review Request: fluxter - a pager for use in fluxbox In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611240957.kAO9vfIE005807@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fluxter - a pager for use in fluxbox https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211551 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-11-24 04:57 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > > * Why do you change fluxbox to fluxter in Makefiles? The fluxter > > files seems to live happily in %{_datadir}/fluxbox. Even if fluxter > > is usefull without fluxbox. > > Well I dont have a solid answer for that, I just figured someone would look > there for the configs before they looked in the fluxbox dir for them I think that user wanting to configure fluxter are likely to know rpm -ql. In my opinion changing fluxbox to fluxter is the right thing to do, but should much better be done upstream. I found that a doc file is installed in /usr/share/fluxter/README.fluxter, it should much better be in %doc, with a name like README.config. And I still think that there should not be a requires fluxbox since it certainly works in any window manager accepting dockapps. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 24 12:02:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2006 07:02:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215165] Review Request: audacious-plugins - Plugins for the Audacious media player In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611241202.kAOC2tVH012945@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: audacious-plugins - Plugins for the Audacious media player https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215165 ------- Additional Comments From redhat-bugzilla at camperquake.de 2006-11-24 07:02 EST ------- Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 24 12:50:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2006 07:50:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 202901] Review Request: pgFouine - PostgreSQL log analyzer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611241250.kAOCoOqc014683@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pgFouine - PostgreSQL log analyzer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202901 ------- Additional Comments From devrim at commandprompt.com 2006-11-24 07:50 EST ------- Hello, Here are the new spec the file and srpm: http://developer.postgresql.org/~devrim/rpms/other/pgfouine/pgfouine.spec http://developer.postgresql.org/~devrim/rpms/other/pgfouine/pgfouine-0.7.1-1.src.rpm Anything left for approval? Regards, Devrim -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 24 13:29:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2006 08:29:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 199679] Review Request: pgpool - Connection pooling/replication server for PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611241329.kAODTTf1015982@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pgpool - Connection pooling/replication server for PostgreSQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199679 ------- Additional Comments From devrim at commandprompt.com 2006-11-24 08:29 EST ------- Hello, (In reply to comment #12) > Issues: > > 1. Should this package be named 'postgresql-pgpool', since it > "enhances or adds a new functionality to an existing Fedora Core > or Fedora Extras package without being useful on its own" Good point. Done. > 2. rpmlint says: > > W: pgpool incoherent-version-in-changelog 3.1.1-4 3.1.1-3.fc6 > > Might fix the changelog to not have .fc6 in it. (minor). Fixed, thanks. > 3. I'd have to agree with the point in comment #9 about the > /etc/pgpool.conf.sample file. You should either construct a > /etc/pgpool.conf file for there, or ship no config file and > put the .sample file under doc or the like. Looking at that > file I think you could just install it as /etc/pgpool.conf > and let the end user modify it if they have a diffrent config. Ok, moved that file to docdir. > 4. Is the "Requires: postgresql-server" correct? > Couldn't this run on a machine with no local postgresql-server > installed, talking to remote machines with it installed? I was aware of that problem, and removed that already. > 5. In agreement with comment #9 again, you shouldn't need > to pass anything to the %configure macro. You have: > %configure --sysconfdir=%{_sysconfdir} --mandir=%{_mandir} --libdir=%{_libdir} > but %configure expands to a configure call that already passes > all those values. You can simply have: > > %configure I need to pass them, because configure script has some hardcoded values in it. New spec: http://developer.postgresql.org/~devrim/rpms/other/pgpool/postgresql-pgpool.spec New SRPM: http://developer.postgresql.org/~devrim/rpms/other/pgpool/postgresql-pgpool-3.1.1-5.src.rpm Regards, Devrim -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 24 14:47:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2006 09:47:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215224] Review Request: gtk-murrine-engine - Murrine GTK2 engine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611241447.kAOEl343020550@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtk-murrine-engine - Murrine GTK2 engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215224 ------- Additional Comments From sdl.web at gmail.com 2006-11-24 09:47 EST ------- (In reply to comment #21) > Well, > > * By the way, what is the license of the themes you > included in srpm? Would you ask upstream about this? > > * Also, will you ask upsteam as of the update plan of > themes? A second email to upstream sent. > > * Changelog: > - version-release (0.31-4) and Changelog (0.31-3) is incoherent. Corrected. http://www.srcf.ucam.org/~sl392/fedora/SRPMs/gtk-murrine-engine-0.31-4.leofc5.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 24 16:45:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2006 11:45:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214818] Review Request: audacious - A GTK2 based media player similar to xmms In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611241645.kAOGjmcp024757@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: audacious - A GTK2 based media player similar to xmms https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214818 ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2006-11-24 11:45 EST ------- Thought I'd let you know that I have about 1000 ogg files in my directory, and running an x86_64 FC6 system. When I run audacious (the version that is now in extras) I get *massive* memory leaks. I have 2GB of memory, and about 20% is used normally, but after running audacious for a few minutes selecting several songs my memory usage goes up to about 50%. After even more usage my sytem eventually starts thrashing to the point where I have to basically press the reset button on my PC and reboot. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 24 16:47:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2006 11:47:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 211626] Review Request: xtide - Calculate tide all over the world In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611241647.kAOGlR10024857@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xtide - Calculate tide all over the world https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211626 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-11-24 11:47 EST ------- Thanks, Patrice. I will recheck my package and resubmit them. I would rather open new bug reports to avoid confusion. NOTE: I am now taking a semi-vacation with my parents and so resubmitting new package may be on Sunday or Monday (in Japan, EST+14h. Currently it is around 2 AM on 25th, Sat). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 24 16:51:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2006 11:51:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214818] Review Request: audacious - A GTK2 based media player similar to xmms In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611241651.kAOGpPR5025008@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: audacious - A GTK2 based media player similar to xmms https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214818 ------- Additional Comments From redhat-bugzilla at camperquake.de 2006-11-24 11:51 EST ------- Does it happen with the 386 version, too? My current playlist contains roughly 3000 songs (ogg and mp3 mixed) and I can run it for hours. If it did eat all my memory I'd have noticed, I think. Can you try to rebuild the SRPM reviewed here on x86_64 (please remember that you will need audacious-plugins, too) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 24 17:01:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2006 12:01:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 211834] Review Request: gaim-libnotify - libnotify notification plugin for gaim In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611241701.kAOH1wTK025546@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gaim-libnotify - libnotify notification plugin for gaim https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211834 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-11-24 12:01 EST ------- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 24 17:11:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2006 12:11:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215224] Review Request: gtk-murrine-engine - Murrine GTK2 engine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611241711.kAOHB2m2025902@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtk-murrine-engine - Murrine GTK2 engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215224 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-11-24 12:11 EST ------- Well, I have not yet checked your new srpm, however I think it is time I should write the following note. -------------------------------------------------------------- NOTE: Before being sponsored: This package will be accepted with another few (or no) work. But before I accept this package, someone (I am a candidate) should sponsor you. Once you are sponsored, you have the right to formally review other submitters' review request and approve the packages. For this reason, the person who want to be sponsored (like you) are required to "show that you have an understanding of the process and of the packaging guidelines". Usually there are two ways to show this. A. submit other review requests with enough quality. B. Do a "pre-review" (at the time you are not sponsored, you cannot do a formal review) of other person's review request. When you submitted a new review request or have pre-reviewed other person's review request, please write the bug number on this bug report so that I can check your comments or review request. Fedora Extras package review requests which are waiting for someone to review can be checked on: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/showdependencytree.cgi?id=FE-NEW&hide_resolved=1 And Please check the details on http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/HowToGetSponsored -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 24 17:19:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2006 12:19:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215224] Review Request: gtk-murrine-engine - Murrine GTK2 engine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611241719.kAOHJafc026157@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtk-murrine-engine - Murrine GTK2 engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215224 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-11-24 12:19 EST ------- Another note: ------------------------------------------------------------------- Review guidelines are described mainly on: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 24 17:22:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2006 12:22:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214818] Review Request: audacious - A GTK2 based media player similar to xmms In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611241722.kAOHM4pd026328@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: audacious - A GTK2 based media player similar to xmms https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214818 ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2006-11-24 12:22 EST ------- I rebuilt the current rpms in this bug report and I can no longer reproduce the memory leak. :) One other problem I notice is that bmp used to remember the last song I selected when I opened the file open dialog box. audacious no longer remembers the last song I selected and when the file open dialog box is opened it always starts at the top of the directory list. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 24 17:46:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2006 12:46:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215267] Review Request: Django - A high-level Python Web framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611241746.kAOHk0Mt027196@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Django - A high-level Python Web framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215267 jamatos at fc.up.pt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jamatos at fc.up.pt 2006-11-24 12:45 EST ------- Review for release 1: * RPM name is OK * Source Django-0.95.tar.gz is the same as upstream * Builds fine in mock * rpmlint of Django looks OK * rpmlint of Django-docs looks OK * File list of Django looks OK * File list of Django-docs looks OK * License is OK * Spec file is written in American English in a readable and clean way Approved -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 24 18:19:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2006 13:19:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 211834] Review Request: gaim-libnotify - libnotify notification plugin for gaim In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611241819.kAOIJSeK028186@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gaim-libnotify - libnotify notification plugin for gaim https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211834 ------- Additional Comments From jon.nettleton at gmail.com 2006-11-24 13:19 EST ------- Sorry, between work and being laid up with pneumonia I have had no time to follow up on this. If someone wants to get this into extras quicker feel free to take over this bug and submit it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 24 18:23:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2006 13:23:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217180] New: Review Request: wbxml2 - WBXML parser and compiler library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217180 Summary: Review Request: wbxml2 - WBXML parser and compiler library Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: laurent.rineau__fedora_extras at normalesup.org QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www-sop.inria.fr/geometrica/team/Laurent.Rineau/Fedora/wbxml2.spec SRPM URL: http://www-sop.inria.fr/geometrica/team/Laurent.Rineau/Fedora/wbxml2-0.9.2-3.src.rpm Description: The WBXML Library (libwbxml) contains a library and its associated tools to parse, encode and handle WBXML documents. The WBXML format is a binary representation of XML, defined by the Wap Forum, and used to reduce bandwidth in mobile communications. This library is a required by libsyncml (to be submitted latter). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 24 19:24:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2006 14:24:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216519] Review Request: sdparm - List or change SCSI disk parameters In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611241924.kAOJOAu2030355@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sdparm - List or change SCSI disk parameters https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216519 terjeros at phys.ntnu.no changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 24 19:25:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2006 14:25:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 190213] Review Request: gq - Graphical LDAP directory browser and editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611241925.kAOJPWbu030460@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gq - Graphical LDAP directory browser and editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190213 terjeros at phys.ntnu.no changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 24 19:33:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2006 14:33:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 182175] Review Request: libast - handy routines and drop-in substitutes for some good-but-non-portable functions (needed by eterm) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611241933.kAOJXhkr030740@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libast - handy routines and drop-in substitutes for some good-but-non-portable functions (needed by eterm) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=182175 terjeros at phys.ntnu.no changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 24 19:34:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2006 14:34:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 182173] Review Request: eterm - a color vt102 terminal emulator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611241934.kAOJY7Ij030776@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eterm - a color vt102 terminal emulator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=182173 Bug 182173 depends on bug 182175, which changed state. Bug 182175 Summary: Review Request: libast - handy routines and drop-in substitutes for some good-but-non-portable functions (needed by eterm) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=182175 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|NEW |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 24 20:23:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2006 15:23:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 182173] Review Request: eterm - a color vt102 terminal emulator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611242023.kAOKNuph032152@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eterm - a color vt102 terminal emulator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=182173 ------- Additional Comments From terjeros at phys.ntnu.no 2006-11-24 15:23 EST ------- > 1) literally hundreds of "pointer targets ... differ in signedness" > warnings which are worrisome but perhaps ignorable I have used Eterm for years without problems... > 2) there appear to be some missing BuildRequires and/or some missing > functionality such as: > > checking for Etwin support... > checking for Tw_Open in -lTw... no > configure: WARNING: *** Twin support has been > disabled because libTw was not found *** I believe this is support for a Twin - a textmode window environment, (http://twin.sf.net), this issue cannot be a blocker. Warning is gone with --disable-etwin. > and I think libXmu-devel needs to be a BR since I don't see how it > gets pulled in by any of the other BRs. Please take a look. Yeah, added pcre-devel too. And fixed the desktop file. > It'll be easy enough to sort out the BuildRequires with mock as soon > as libast is in Extras so we can leave that for later. libast is in FE now :-) New files: SPEC: http://web.phys.ntnu.no/~terjeros/eterm/eterm.spec SRPMS: http://web.phys.ntnu.no/~terjeros/eterm/eterm-0.9.4-2.fc6.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 24 22:37:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2006 17:37:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216535] Review Request: mp3gain - Lossless MP3 volume adjustment tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611242237.kAOMbNxd006503@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mp3gain - Lossless MP3 volume adjustment tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216535 ------- Additional Comments From bugs.michael at gmx.net 2006-11-24 17:37 EST ------- > I believe it should be ok, since it doesn't decode or re-encode. Hmm, the contents of ./mpglibDBL contradict. It is a modified mpg123 decoder library that is included and used. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 24 23:10:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2006 18:10:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217180] Review Request: wbxml2 - WBXML parser and compiler library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611242310.kAONAtZC009042@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wbxml2 - WBXML parser and compiler library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217180 ------- Additional Comments From bugs.michael at gmx.net 2006-11-24 18:10 EST ------- wbxml2 is an orphaned and meanwhile dead.package: http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/rpms/wbxml2/FC-5/?root=extras -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 25 00:01:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2006 19:01:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216535] Review Request: mp3gain - Lossless MP3 volume adjustment tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611250001.kAP01nQA013199@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mp3gain - Lossless MP3 volume adjustment tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216535 bdpepple at ameritech.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 25 01:24:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2006 20:24:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217197] New: Review Request: MyBashBurn 0.1 - burn data and songs. Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217197 Summary: Review Request: MyBashBurn 0.1 - burn data and songs. Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: wilmer at fedoraproject.org QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.fedora-ve.org/mybashburn/downloads/mybashburn.spec SRPM URL: http://www.fedora-ve.org/mybashburn/downloads/mybashburn-0.1-0.src.rpm Project URL: http://www.fedora-ve.org/mybashburn/ Description: MyBashBurn is a applications of use in console, this is a version/fork owned for the cd burning shell script called BashBurn(see http://bashburn.sf.net where also i'm developer) for Linux, this originally not have the best eye-candy CD-burning, neverthless, MyBashBurn use dialog box function which draws (using ncurses) windows onto the screen. MyBashBurn dialog box offer best funcionability, has very good capabilities of automatically finding dependencies and autodetect devices CD/DVD RW. MyBashBurn can burn data cds, music cds, multisession cds. It can burn and create ISO files. It can burn bin/cue files, create mp3s, oggs and flac files. Supports burning DVD-images and data DVDs, and others funny options. MyBashBurn depends on cdrecord and others backend aplications, so basically if your writing device works with it, MyBashBurn will work flawlessly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 25 01:29:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2006 20:29:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217197] Review Request: MyBashBurn 0.1 - burn data and songs. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611250129.kAP1TnQh016193@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: MyBashBurn 0.1 - burn data and songs. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217197 ------- Additional Comments From wilmer at fedoraproject.org 2006-11-24 20:29 EST ------- the support of mp3 depends of the backends applications in fedora core this are disable, like also the support for each one of the others formats. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 25 04:33:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2006 23:33:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217066] Review Request: python-gpod - A python module to access iPod content In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611250433.kAP4XsEc025504@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-gpod - A python module to access iPod content Alias: python-gpod-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217066 ------- Additional Comments From jspaleta at gmail.com 2006-11-24 23:33 EST ------- Since I cannot sponsor the requester, I can not do the formal review of this package. Below I provide my informal review of python-gpod-0.4.0-2.fc7.src.rpm that the sponsering reviewer can look over. I don't see any blockers, see my comments about non-critical specfile style after my review checklist. I will be attempting to test this binding with editted versions of the example scripts provideed in the %docs section. GOOD: Builds in mock against fedora-development-i386 target GOOD: rpmlint runs clean against python-gpod-0.4.0-2.fc7.i386.rpm GOOD: Follows naming guidelines for python packaging. GOOD: the spec file name matches the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec GOOD: the package is licensed LGPL GOOD: the License field matches the actual license. GOOD: COPYING file is included in %doc GOOD: Spec file is written in American English GOOD: Spec file is reasonably legible GOOD: Spec URL points to correct upstream project page GOOD: Included source tarball matches upstream source listed in spec SOURCE0 md5sum: e427e0409b0cb2d7e76b17915b1396fa libgpod-0.4.0.tar.gz GOOD: Locales are not handled in this package. The Locale information is handled in the lingpod package in Core. This package just handled the python bindings which are not currently packaged by Core. GOOD: no shared libraries in linkers default path. GOOD: no request for relocatable packaging GOOD: Package owns all directories it creates. GOOD: No duplicate files in %file GOOD: Permissions are set correctly GOOD: %clean section GOOD: Consistent use of $RPM_BUILD_ROOT GOOD: No significant 'content' in package GOOD: no -docs packagable material GOOD: %docs section holds non-critical examples and COPYING file GOOD: no -devel packagable material GOOD: no .la files included GOOD: no gui applications included GOOD: no duplicate ownership of payload files according to repoquery GOOD: BuildRequires section in spec looks good, SPECFILE NOTES: the sed script to strip the #!/usr/bin/env python line from gtkpod is fine and is technically correct since gtkpod.py is not meant to be run as a standalone executable. Would this be better done as a patch file? The sed script is really simple so I'm not inclined to say this must be done as a patch file. Its a technically correct but inherently cosmetic change. The multiple rm statements in the %install section serve the purpose of excluding files provided in the Core libgpod package. This could be done with a set of %exclude statements in the %files section, but I don't think there is a requirement to choose either style over the other. -jef -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 25 04:42:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2006 23:42:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217066] Review Request: python-gpod - A python module to access iPod content In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611250442.kAP4gg8o026700@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-gpod - A python module to access iPod content Alias: python-gpod-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217066 ------- Additional Comments From jspaleta at gmail.com 2006-11-24 23:42 EST ------- the module itself appears to work just fine. The toy examnples that come in the package appear to work. These bindings don't appear work with the listen application, which assumes the 0.3.2 python bindings, but we have to start somewhere. -jef -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 25 04:55:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2006 23:55:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217197] Review Request: MyBashBurn 0.1 - burn data and songs. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611250455.kAP4t4GR027943@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: MyBashBurn 0.1 - burn data and songs. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217197 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |panemade at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-11-24 23:55 EST ------- Is this your first package to Fedora Extras? If yes then you need to add FE-NEEDSPONSOR in textbox given below next to Bug 217197 blocks. Just had a look at you SPEC and found they are not following http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines like macros,scriptlet rules then %files section included files twice Just look at those guidelines and resubmit updated package -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 25 05:23:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2006 00:23:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217066] Review Request: python-gpod - A python module to access iPod content In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611250523.kAP5NSKI028927@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-gpod - A python module to access iPod content Alias: python-gpod-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217066 ------- Additional Comments From tmz at pobox.com 2006-11-25 00:23 EST ------- Thanks Jef. I understand the points about using sed and rm and I did consider the alternatives. I'm not tied to either method so if there's a preference to do it one way or the other, I'll change it to be more consistant with other FE packages. My reasoning went like this: Both the sed removal of the bang in gtkpod.py and the chmod of the example scripts were needed to fix things rpmlint would complain about, so it seemed better to do them both in the same place than to put one into a patch that others would have to check out separately. Using rm instead of %excludes seems cleaner looking to me since it's such a wholesale removal. I did use the info from the %files section of the core libgpod package, so perhaps it'd be just as correct to modify those entries into %excludes. Like I said, I'm not tied to either method so if there's a preference for FE packages I'll change to match that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 25 05:27:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2006 00:27:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217066] Review Request: python-gpod - A python module to access iPod content In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611250527.kAP5RKtY028989@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-gpod - A python module to access iPod content Alias: python-gpod-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217066 ------- Additional Comments From tmz at pobox.com 2006-11-25 00:27 EST ------- I've not used listen but if I get some time to play with it I'll see if I can locate what things are broken that are preventing it from working (and whether it's in the bindings or listen). The API changes in libgpod weren't major, so any changes that might need made to listen are probably pretty minor. Upstream may even have something in their development that works with 0.4.x already (though you may have already checked that). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 25 09:38:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2006 04:38:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216535] Review Request: mp3gain - Lossless MP3 volume adjustment tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611250938.kAP9cEnl004037@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mp3gain - Lossless MP3 volume adjustment tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216535 ville.skytta at iki.fi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 25 10:00:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2006 05:00:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217225] New: Review Request: perl-Apache-DBI - Initiate a persistent database connection Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217225 Summary: Review Request: perl-Apache-DBI - Initiate a persistent database connection Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: Fedora at FamilleCollet.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://remi.collet.free.fr/rpms/extras/perl-Apache-DBI.spec SRPM URL: http://remi.collet.free.fr/rpms/extras/perl-Apache-DBI-1.05-1.fc7.src.rpm Mock Log: http://remi.collet.free.fr/rpms/extras/perl-Apache-DBI-build.log Description: This is version 1.05 of Apache::AuthDBI and Apache::DBI. These modules are supposed to be used with the Apache server together with an embedded perl interpreter like mod_perl. They provide support for basic authentication and authorization as well as support for persistent database connections via Perl's Database Independent Interface (DBI). o DBI.pm provides persistent database connections: - connections can be established during server-startup - configurable rollback to ensure data integrity - configurable verification of the connections to avoid time-outs. o AuthDBI.pm provides authentication and authorization: - optional shared cache for passwords to minimize database load - configurable cleanup-handler deletes outdated entries from the cache Apache::DBI has been in widespread deployment on many platforms for years. Apache::DBI is one of the most widely used mod_perl related modules. It can be considered stable. --- I'm not used to package PERL extension, but this one is needed by a project i work on (ocsinventory). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 25 10:19:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2006 05:19:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217225] Review Request: perl-Apache-DBI - Initiate a persistent database connection In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611251019.kAPAJxcq005616@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Apache-DBI - Initiate a persistent database connection https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217225 ville.skytta at iki.fi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |ville.skytta at iki.fi OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2006-11-25 05:19 EST ------- The perldoc generated license files are not needed, and should go. Instead, it would be a good idea to ask upstream to include license files in the distribution. Improved Summary suggestion: Persistent database connections with Apache/mod_perl How about a "Requires: mod_perl"? I'm not sure if this package would work at all without it, but I suppose at least it's not that useful without it. OPTIMIZE="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS" should go, this is a noarch package. Include traces.txt and eg/ in docs? Remember to do something like this in %prep: %{__perl} -pi -e 's|/usr/local/bin/perl|%{__perl}|' eg/startup.pl chmod 644 eg/startup.pl -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 25 11:07:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2006 06:07:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217225] Review Request: perl-Apache-DBI - Initiate a persistent database connection In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611251107.kAPB7g9t009314@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Apache-DBI - Initiate a persistent database connection https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217225 ------- Additional Comments From Fedora at FamilleCollet.com 2006-11-25 06:07 EST ------- > How about a "Requires: mod_perl"? I'm not sure if this package would work at > all without it, but I suppose at least it's not that useful without it. It can be used in cgi mode, so without mod_perl (ok, not very usefull). Other perl-Apache extension didn't require it too. Spec URL: http://remi.collet.free.fr/rpms/extras/perl-Apache-DBI.spec SRPM URL: http://remi.collet.free.fr/rpms/extras/perl-Apache-DBI-1.05-2.fc7.src.rpm Mock Log: http://remi.collet.free.fr/rpms/extras/perl-Apache-DBI-build.log Changes - no more perldoc - no more OPTIMIZE - traces.txt & eg/ add to %doc - Improved Summary -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 25 11:18:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2006 06:18:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217229] New: Review Request: libmpd - Music Player Daemon library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217229 Summary: Review Request: libmpd - Music Player Daemon library Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: adrian at lisas.de QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://lisas.de/~adrian/rpm/libmpd.spec SRPM URL: http://lisas.de/~adrian/rpm/libmpd-0.12.0-2.src.rpm Description: libmpd is an abstraction around libmpdclient. It provides an easy and reliable callback based interface to mpd. This library is needed to update gmpc to 0.13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 25 11:23:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2006 06:23:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 210553] Review Request: xerces-c - Validating XML Parser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611251123.kAPBN5wV009778@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xerces-c - Validating XML Parser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210553 ------- Additional Comments From lemenkov at gmail.com 2006-11-25 06:23 EST ------- (In reply to comment #15) > (In reply to comment #14) > > E: xerces-c-doc script-without-shebang > > /usr/share/doc/xerces-c-doc-2.7.0/samples/configure.in > > E: xerces-c-doc script-without-shebang > > /usr/share/doc/xerces-c-doc-2.7.0/samples/config.h.in > > These should be trivially fixed with something like > chmod -x samples/{config.h,configure}.in > in %prep. Done. > > We can simply remove all these executable scripts from docs > > A dependency on /bin/sh is not really a problem here IMO. OK. http://lemenkov.newmail.ru/SPECS/xerces-c.spec http://lemenkov.newmail.ru/SRPMS/xerces-c-2.7.0-5.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 25 12:20:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2006 07:20:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217231] New: Review Request: keyTouch Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217231 Summary: Review Request: keyTouch Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: denisl78 at gmail.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Description: KeyTouch is a program which allows you to easily configure the extra function keys of your keyboard. This means that you can define, for every individual function key, what to do if it is pressed. http://keytouch.sourceforge.net -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 25 12:20:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2006 07:20:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217232] New: Review Request: keyTouch Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217232 Summary: Review Request: keyTouch Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: denisl78 at gmail.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Description: KeyTouch is a program which allows you to easily configure the extra function keys of your keyboard. This means that you can define, for every individual function key, what to do if it is pressed. http://keytouch.sourceforge.net -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 25 12:24:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2006 07:24:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217232] Review Request: keyTouch In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611251224.kAPCOn5c011494@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: keyTouch https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217232 giallu at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: keyTouch |Review Request: keyTouch ------- Additional Comments From giallu at gmail.com 2006-11-25 07:24 EST ------- I was trying to find some time for packaging this, so I guess I could instead review yours. Where are the spec and srpm? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 25 12:43:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2006 07:43:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217225] Review Request: perl-Apache-DBI - Initiate a persistent database connection In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611251243.kAPChoDp012179@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Apache-DBI - Initiate a persistent database connection https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217225 ville.skytta at iki.fi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2006-11-25 07:43 EST ------- Ok, approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 25 12:45:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2006 07:45:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217232] Review Request: keyTouch In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611251245.kAPCjbw6012297@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: keyTouch https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217232 rpm at greysector.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rpm at greysector.net ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2006-11-25 07:45 EST ------- I'm interested in reviewing, too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 25 13:14:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2006 08:14:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217225] Review Request: perl-Apache-DBI - Initiate a persistent database connection In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611251314.kAPDECtQ013673@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Apache-DBI - Initiate a persistent database connection https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217225 Fedora at FamilleCollet.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 25 13:27:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2006 08:27:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217229] Review Request: libmpd - Music Player Daemon library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611251327.kAPDRQ7l014284@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libmpd - Music Player Daemon library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217229 gauret at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From gauret at free.fr 2006-11-25 08:27 EST ------- Review for release 2: * RPM name is OK * Source libmpd-0.12.0.tar.gz is the same as upstream * Builds fine in mock * rpmlint of libmpd looks OK * rpmlint of libmpd-devel looks OK * File list of libmpd looks OK * File list of libmpd-devel looks OK * INSERT RESULT OF RUN TEST Needs work: * As libmpd-devel ships a pkgconfig file (.pc), is should have "Requires: pkgconfig" Fix this and you're good to go -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 25 14:07:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2006 09:07:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217231] Review Request: keyTouch In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611251407.kAPE7ZST016875@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: keyTouch https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217231 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: keyTouch |Review Request: keyTouch CC| |panemade at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-11-25 09:07 EST ------- Is this your first package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 25 14:08:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2006 09:08:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 212715] Review Request: openvrml - VRML/X3D runtime library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611251408.kAPE81XM016901@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: openvrml - VRML/X3D runtime library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212715 Didier.Moens at dmbr.UGent.be changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |Didier.Moens at dmbr.UGent.be ------- Additional Comments From Didier.Moens at dmbr.UGent.be 2006-11-25 09:07 EST ------- Confirming absence of OpenVRML plugin in 'about:plugins' and subsequent failure to handle .wrl files, as reported in comment #21. - firefox-1.5.0.8-1.fc6 - No improvement with new created profile - strace reveals openvrml.so being loaded when consulting "about:plugins" - ldd /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins/openvrml.so shows no obvious problems -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 25 14:12:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2006 09:12:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217232] Review Request: keyTouch In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611251412.kAPECXYr017234@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: keyTouch https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217232 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |panemade at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-11-25 09:12 EST ------- me also interested but i am not able to found Reporter in owners.list -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 25 14:12:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2006 09:12:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217231] Review Request: keyTouch In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611251412.kAPECRqT017218@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: keyTouch https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217231 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-11-25 09:12 EST ------- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 217232 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 25 14:12:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2006 09:12:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217232] Review Request: keyTouch In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611251412.kAPECc1U017255@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: keyTouch https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217232 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-11-25 09:12 EST ------- *** Bug 217231 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 25 14:14:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2006 09:14:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217229] Review Request: libmpd - Music Player Daemon library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611251414.kAPEEVvb017424@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libmpd - Music Player Daemon library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217229 ------- Additional Comments From gauret at free.fr 2006-11-25 09:14 EST ------- (sorry for the "INSERT RESULT OF RUN TEST", I did actually test it) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 25 14:16:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2006 09:16:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 210553] Review Request: xerces-c - Validating XML Parser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611251416.kAPEG4e4017570@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xerces-c - Validating XML Parser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210553 gauret at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |gauret at free.fr OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From gauret at free.fr 2006-11-25 09:15 EST ------- Review for release 5: * RPM name is OK * Source xerces-c-src_2_7_0.tar.gz is the same as upstream * Builds fine in mock * rpmlints look OK * File lists look OK * Works fine approved -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 25 14:20:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2006 09:20:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217180] Review Request: wbxml2 - WBXML parser and compiler library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611251420.kAPEKhxs017971@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wbxml2 - WBXML parser and compiler library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217180 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 25 14:21:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2006 09:21:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216723] Review Request: libsieve - A library for parsing, sorting and filtering your mail In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611251421.kAPELINI018070@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libsieve - A library for parsing, sorting and filtering your mail https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216723 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 25 14:41:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2006 09:41:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217231] Review Request: keyTouch In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611251441.kAPEfOie019081@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: keyTouch https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217231 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 25 15:34:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2006 10:34:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216517] Review Request: gnome-valgrind-session - Run an entire GNOME session under valgrind In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611251534.kAPFYbX0021021@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-valgrind-session - Run an entire GNOME session under valgrind https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216517 hpj at novell.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |hpj at novell.com ------- Additional Comments From hpj at novell.com 2006-11-25 10:34 EST ------- Dave, I put the tarball you asked for at http://hp.cl.no/proj/gnome-valgrind-session/src/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 25 15:38:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2006 10:38:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217239] New: Review Request: arrows - Neat little maze game Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217239 Summary: Review Request: arrows - Neat little maze game Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/arrows.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/arrows-0.6-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: It's a maze game of sorts. Guide the spinning blue thing through the maze of arrows, creating and destroying arrows as necessary to collect the green things. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 25 16:01:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2006 11:01:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217239] Review Request: arrows - Neat little maze game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611251601.kAPG1lZ8021728@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: arrows - Neat little maze game Alias: arrows https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217239 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |chris.stone at gmail.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | Alias| |arrows -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 25 16:58:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2006 11:58:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 210553] Review Request: xerces-c - Validating XML Parser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611251658.kAPGwQKe023196@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xerces-c - Validating XML Parser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210553 ------- Additional Comments From lemenkov at gmail.com 2006-11-25 11:58 EST ------- Failed on x86_64, as already mentioned Ville Skytt?. http://buildsys.fedoraproject.org/logs/fedora-development-extras/22298-xerces-c-2.7.0-5.fc7/x86_64/build.log + export DOCDIR + rm -rf /var/tmp/xerces-c-2.7.0-5.fc7-root-mockbuild/usr/share/doc/xerces-c-doc-2.7.0 + /bin/mkdir -p /var/tmp/xerces-c-2.7.0-5.fc7-root-mockbuild/usr/share/doc/xerces-c-doc-2.7.0 + cp -pr Readme.html LICENSE NOTICE STATUS credits.txt doc samples /var/tmp/xerces-c-2.7.0-5.fc7-root-mockbuild/usr/share/doc/xerces-c-doc-2.7.0 + exit 0 Requires(rpmlib): rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 Processing files: xerces-c-debuginfo-2.7.0-5.fc7 Provides: libxerces-c.so.27.0.debug()(64bit) libxerces-depdom.so.27.0.debug()(64bit) Requires(rpmlib): rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 RPM build errors: File not found by glob: /var/tmp/xerces-c-2.7.0-5.fc7-root-mockbuild/usr/lib64/libxerces*.so.* File not found by glob: /var/tmp/xerces-c-2.7.0-5.fc7-root-mockbuild/usr/lib64/libxerces*.so -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 25 17:05:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2006 12:05:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 210553] Review Request: xerces-c - Validating XML Parser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611251705.kAPH57E6023543@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xerces-c - Validating XML Parser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210553 ------- Additional Comments From gauret at free.fr 2006-11-25 12:05 EST ------- The perl line in %prep was supposed to fix this. Now I realize there is a typo in this line : there is a w at the end of the line which should be removed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 25 17:11:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2006 12:11:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216517] Review Request: gnome-valgrind-session - Run an entire GNOME session under valgrind In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611251711.kAPHBA1k023873@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-valgrind-session - Run an entire GNOME session under valgrind https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216517 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 25 17:16:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2006 12:16:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215267] Review Request: Django - A high-level Python Web framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611251716.kAPHGksp024178@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Django - A high-level Python Web framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215267 michel.salim at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From michel.salim at gmail.com 2006-11-25 12:16 EST ------- Built for Rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 25 17:19:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2006 12:19:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216723] Review Request: libsieve - A library for parsing, sorting and filtering your mail In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611251719.kAPHJR8G024300@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libsieve - A library for parsing, sorting and filtering your mail https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216723 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-11-25 12:19 EST ------- Is this your first package? Not able to see you in any existing package owner. If you are first time submitter then i can not officially review this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 25 17:42:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2006 12:42:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217239] Review Request: arrows - Neat little maze game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611251742.kAPHg1cw025311@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: arrows - Neat little maze game Alias: arrows https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217239 ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2006-11-25 12:41 EST ------- ==== REVIEW CHECKLIST ==== - rpmlint output clean - package named according to package naming guidelines - spec filename matches %{name} - package meets Packaging Guidelines - package licensed with open source compatible license - license matches actual license - license file included in %doc - spec written in American english - spec is legible - sources match upstream d6cf52ff319c295b9fb6982c023ec7f0 arrows-0.6.tar.gz - successfully compiles and builds on FC6 x86_64 - all build dependencies listed in BR - no locales - no shared libraries - package is not relocatable - package owns all directories it creates X package uses a directory it doesnt create and I cannot determine if its pulled in from Requires packages. This package puts an icon in /usr/share/icons/hicolor/24x24/apps/ - no duplicates in %files - file permissions set properly - package contains proper %clean - macro usage consistent - contains code - no large documentation - %doc does not affect runtime - no header files or static libraries - no pkgconfig files - no devel subpackage required - no .la files O desktop file installed properly (although see my comment in SHOULD fix) - package does not own files or directories owned by other packages ==== MUST FIX ==== - Shouldn't this require some package to get the icon dir? If not, please tell me how I determine which Requires would pull this in. Perhaps Require: gnome-icon-theme? Or hicolor-icon-theme if you decide to move this out of the GNOME menu (see SHOULD FIX section). ==== SHOULD FIX ==== - I'm not sure I agree all games compiled with gtk2 should be placed under GNOME->Games. I think GNOME->Games should be for games that are distributed with GNOME much like KDE has their kde-games package. This may require further discussion on the fedora-games-list. Not a blocker. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 25 17:44:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2006 12:44:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216947] Review Request: perl-Gtk2-Notify - Gtk2::Notify Perl module In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611251744.kAPHilEF025422@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Gtk2-Notify - Gtk2::Notify Perl module https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216947 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-11-25 12:44 EST ------- Till you take time to update new SRPM here comes review Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and but NOT for RPMS. But those warnings are ignored. + source files match upstream. 77a64c944cf1516bcc514456de22a82b Gtk2-Notify-0.02.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. License text included in package. + %doc is small; no -doc subpackage required. + %doc does not affect runtime. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage exists + no .la files. + no translations are available + Dose owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + Followed perl packaging guidelines. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 25 17:45:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2006 12:45:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214818] Review Request: audacious - A GTK2 based media player similar to xmms In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611251745.kAPHjVGj025463@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: audacious - A GTK2 based media player similar to xmms https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214818 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-11-25 12:45 EST ------- Ok here comes Final Review. Review: + package builds in mock (development i386) for FC6. + rpmlint is silent for RPM and SRPM. + source files match upstream. f718f66ec0cab46bf6210d2243d12be1 audacious-1.2.1.tgz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named and is cleanly written. + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. License text included in package. + %doc is small; no -doc subpackage required. + %doc does not affect runtime. + COPYING included in %doc. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + .pc files present in -devel + -devel and -libs subpackage exists + no .la files. + translations are available. + update-desktop-database is used at postun and post + called /sbin/ldconfig on libs package. + owns the directories it creates. + doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + Desktop file installed successfully + Desktop file is handled correctly in SPEC file. + GUI application APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 25 17:48:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2006 12:48:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216723] Review Request: libsieve - A library for parsing, sorting and filtering your mail In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611251748.kAPHmCQx025564@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libsieve - A library for parsing, sorting and filtering your mail https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216723 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-11-25 12:48 EST ------- you need to correct SPEC. I got following rpmlint warnings on binary rpm W: libsieve incoherent-version-in-changelog 2.1.13-1.1.sc 2.1.13-1.1 The last entry in %changelog contains a version identifier that is not coherent with the epoch:version-release tuple of the package. ==> Remove .sc from Chnagelog W: libsieve devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/libsieve.so A development file (usually source code) is located in a non-devel package. If you want to include source code in your package, be sure to create a development package. ==> .so files are part of -devel packages. W: libsieve one-line-command-in-%post /sbin/ldconfig You should use %post -p instead of using: %post It will avoid the fork of a shell interpreter to execute your command as well as allows rpm to automatically mark the dependency on your command. ==>Use %post -p /sbin/ldconfig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 25 17:52:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2006 12:52:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216947] Review Request: perl-Gtk2-Notify - Gtk2::Notify Perl module In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611251752.kAPHq3ai025684@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Gtk2-Notify - Gtk2::Notify Perl module https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216947 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-11-25 12:52 EST ------- I checked md5 against Source URL you provided. I can approve this package if you are going to include new source url while importing this package or submit new one . Will check it and then actually approve this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 25 18:03:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2006 13:03:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 210553] Review Request: xerces-c - Validating XML Parser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611251803.kAPI3twW026136@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xerces-c - Validating XML Parser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210553 lemenkov at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From lemenkov at gmail.com 2006-11-25 13:03 EST ------- Done. Successfully built in devel. Thanks for review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 25 18:04:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2006 13:04:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216130] Review Request: glest - 3D real time strategy game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611251804.kAPI4HoX026167@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glest - 3D real time strategy game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216130 Bug 216130 depends on bug 210553, which changed state. Bug 210553 Summary: Review Request: xerces-c - Validating XML Parser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210553 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 25 18:12:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2006 13:12:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216131] Review Request: glest-data - Data files for the game Glest In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611251812.kAPICjXQ026615@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glest-data - Data files for the game Glest Alias: glest-data https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216131 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |chris.stone at gmail.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | Alias| |glest-data -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 25 18:18:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2006 13:18:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214818] Review Request: audacious - A GTK2 based media player similar to xmms In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611251818.kAPII6J3026801@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: audacious - A GTK2 based media player similar to xmms https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214818 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 25 18:31:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2006 13:31:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216723] Review Request: libsieve - A library for parsing, sorting and filtering your mail In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611251831.kAPIVQJI027422@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libsieve - A library for parsing, sorting and filtering your mail https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216723 ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2006-11-25 13:31 EST ------- > Is this your first package? Not able to see you in any existing package owner. > If you are first time submitter then i can not officially review this package. Yes, it's the first package I've submitted to FE. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 25 18:41:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2006 13:41:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213798] Review Request: python-alsaaudio - Python Alsa Bindings In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611251841.kAPIfCxA027848@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-alsaaudio - Python Alsa Bindings https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213798 mr.ecik at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mr.ecik at gmail.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mr.ecik at gmail.com 2006-11-25 13:41 EST ------- MUST items: * rpmlint output: W: python-alsaaudio invalid-license PSF - see LICENSE * package is named well * spec file name is good * package meets Packaging Guideline * package is licensed with a PSF open-source compatible license * License field in spec file matches actual license * license file is included in %doc * md5sums are matching (23163f572f8f3a0b295f48f90165e767) * package successfully compiles on x86_64 * BuildRequires listed well * no locales * no need to %post and %postun sections * not relocatable * no duplicates in %files * every %files section includes %defattr * proper %clean sectio * macros used well Nothings stands in the way to approve this package :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 25 19:23:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2006 14:23:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216723] Review Request: libsieve - A library for parsing, sorting and filtering your mail In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611251923.kAPJNOuA029737@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libsieve - A library for parsing, sorting and filtering your mail https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216723 ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2006-11-25 14:23 EST ------- Updated as requested in comment #2. Spec URL: http://www.symetrix.com/~bjohnson/projects/Fedora-Extras/libsieve.spec SRPM URL: http://www.symetrix.com/~bjohnson/projects/Fedora-Extras/libsieve-2.1.13-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 25 19:59:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2006 14:59:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214818] Review Request: audacious - A GTK2 based media player similar to xmms In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611251959.kAPJxAdY031358@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: audacious - A GTK2 based media player similar to xmms https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214818 ------- Additional Comments From redhat-bugzilla at camperquake.de 2006-11-25 14:59 EST ------- Thanks for the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 25 20:02:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2006 15:02:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216130] Review Request: glest - 3D real time strategy game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611252002.kAPK2WB2031515@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glest - 3D real time strategy game Alias: glest https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216130 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |chris.stone at gmail.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | Alias| |glest -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 25 20:37:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2006 15:37:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217239] Review Request: arrows - Neat little maze game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611252037.kAPKbq1H032485@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: arrows - Neat little maze game Alias: arrows https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217239 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-11-25 15:37 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > ==== MUST FIX ==== > - Shouldn't this require some package to get the icon dir? If not, please tell > me how I determine which Requires would pull this in. Perhaps Require: > gnome-icon-theme? Or hicolor-icon-theme if you decide to move this out of the > GNOME menu (see SHOULD FIX section). > Yes it should have a "Requires: hicolor-icon-theme", my bad , fixed. > ==== SHOULD FIX ==== > - I'm not sure I agree all games compiled with gtk2 should be placed under > GNOME->Games. I think GNOME->Games should be for games that are distributed > with GNOME much like KDE has their kde-games package. This may require further > discussion on the fedora-games-list. Not a blocker. I took that GNOME entry in the .desktop over from the package on which I based mine, but I agree it isn't a gnome app, dropped. New version here: Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/arrows.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/arrows-0.6-2.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 25 20:51:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2006 15:51:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216131] Review Request: glest-data - Data files for the game Glest In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611252051.kAPKpCmc000477@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glest-data - Data files for the game Glest Alias: glest-data https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216131 ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2006-11-25 15:51 EST ------- ==== REVIEW CHECKLIST ==== - rpmlint output: W: glest-data strange-permission glest-get-translations.sh 0775 W: glest-data no-%build-section You should add a %build with a comment explaining it is not needed Change permissions of SOURCE1 to 755 Explain why you do not install SOURCE1 - package named according to package naming guidelines - spec filename matches %{name} - package meets packaging guidelines - package licensed with open source compatible license X license does not match actual license This is confusing, it looks like the data has a seperate license which just says its distributable, can you clarify this with upstream? I'm not sure this qualifies as being open source compatible. - license included in %doc - spec written in American english - spec legible - source matches upstream 8b6902e82874011e768c64e20fbeead5 glest_data_2.0.0.zip - package successfully compiles and builds on FC6 x86_64 - all build dependencies listed in BR - no locales - no shared libraries - package is not relocatable - package owns all directories it creates - all other directories it uses are provided by Requries - no duplicates in %files - file permissions set properly - package contains proper %clean section - macro usage is consistent - contains permissible content - no large documentation - files in %doc do not affect runtime - no header files or static libraries - no pkgconfig files - no need for a devel subpackage - no .la files - not a GUI app needed a .desktop file - package does not own files or directories owned by other packages ==== MUST FIX ==== - Why do you include SOURCE1 (glest-get-translations.sh) but do not install it? - Change permissions on SOURCE1 to 755 - Add empty %build with a comment saying nothing to build - data looks like it is not licensed as GPL. Please clarify with upstream - add punctuation to description -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 25 20:57:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2006 15:57:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217239] Review Request: arrows - Neat little maze game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611252057.kAPKvevT000686@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: arrows - Neat little maze game Alias: arrows https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217239 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2006-11-25 15:57 EST ------- All MUST/SHOULD items fixed. Please re-check scummvm spec for icon issue mentioned here, I might have missed this on my review of scummvm. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 25 21:17:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2006 16:17:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217239] Review Request: arrows - Neat little maze game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611252117.kAPLHQdi001422@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: arrows - Neat little maze game Alias: arrows https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217239 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-11-25 16:17 EST ------- Thanks, imported and build, closing. p.s. scummvm is fine. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 25 21:17:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2006 16:17:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217249] New: Review Request: atomorun - Jump&Run game where you have to flee an exploding nuclear bomb Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217249 Summary: Review Request: atomorun - Jump&Run game where you have to flee an exploding nuclear bomb Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/atomorun.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/atomorun-1.1-0.1.pre2.fc7.src.rpm Description: Atomorun is a OpenGL Jump&Run game where you have to flee an exploding nuclear bomb. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 25 21:34:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2006 16:34:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217249] Review Request: atomorun - Jump&Run game where you have to flee an exploding nuclear bomb In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611252134.kAPLY4Ms001923@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: atomorun - Jump&Run game where you have to flee an exploding nuclear bomb Alias: atomorun https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217249 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |chris.stone at gmail.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | Alias| |atomorun -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 25 21:49:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2006 16:49:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 204700] Review Request: njb-sharp - C# bindings to libnjb In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611252149.kAPLn87d002332@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: njb-sharp - C# bindings to libnjb https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204700 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-11-25 16:48 EST ------- This package has been approved. Please close the bug and import (if you haven't already) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 25 21:53:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2006 16:53:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 211728] Review Request: stklos - Scheme Interpreter/Compiler System In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611252153.kAPLrpHt002483@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: stklos - Scheme Interpreter/Compiler System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211728 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-11-25 16:53 EST ------- ping! Anything happening on this? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 25 21:54:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2006 16:54:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217249] Review Request: atomorun - Jump&Run game where you have to flee an exploding nuclear bomb In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611252154.kAPLsDrI002507@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: atomorun - Jump&Run game where you have to flee an exploding nuclear bomb Alias: atomorun https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217249 ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2006-11-25 16:53 EST ------- ==== REVIEW CHECKLIST ==== - rpmlint output clean - package named according to package naming guidelines - spec file name matches %{name} - package meets packaging guidelines - package licensed with open source compatible license - license matches actual license - license included in %doc - spec written in American english - spec legible - sources match upstream 41522a330c0da7c6e79c46baa2c1d8c3 atomorun-1.1_pre2.tar.gz - package successfully compiles and builds on FC6 x86_64 - all build dependencies listed in BR - no locales - no shared libraries - package is not relocatable - package owns all directories it creates X package uses a directory which is not pulled in from Requires - no duplicates in %files - file permissions set properly - spec contains proper %clean section - macro usage is consistent - package contains code - no large documentation - %doc does not affect runtime - no header files or static libraries - no pkgconfig files - no devel subpackage required - no .la files - GUI app contains proper .desktop file - package does not own files or directories owned by other packages ==== MUST FIX ==== - Add Requires: icons-hicolor-theme to pull in icons directory -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 25 22:01:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2006 17:01:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 204700] Review Request: njb-sharp - C# bindings to libnjb In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611252201.kAPM1MeD002708@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: njb-sharp - C# bindings to libnjb https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204700 ------- Additional Comments From triad at df.lth.se 2006-11-25 17:01 EST ------- The import was stalled for a few days due to the CVS outage, it was then imported and now we are waiting for branches for FC-5 and FC-6: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/CVSSyncNeeded The bug will be closed once it's built etc. Thanks for keeping an eye on this Paul! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 25 22:01:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2006 17:01:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217249] Review Request: atomorun - Jump&Run game where you have to flee an exploding nuclear bomb In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611252201.kAPM1ibP002733@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: atomorun - Jump&Run game where you have to flee an exploding nuclear bomb Alias: atomorun https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217249 mr.ecik at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mr.ecik at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From mr.ecik at gmail.com 2006-11-25 17:01 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > ==== MUST FIX ==== > - Add Requires: icons-hicolor-theme to pull in icons directory > Shouldn't it be hicolor-icon-theme? ;) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 25 22:02:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2006 17:02:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217249] Review Request: atomorun - Jump&Run game where you have to flee an exploding nuclear bomb In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611252202.kAPM2DJ1002755@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: atomorun - Jump&Run game where you have to flee an exploding nuclear bomb Alias: atomorun https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217249 ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2006-11-25 17:02 EST ------- > Shouldn't it be hicolor-icon-theme? ;) ya probably :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 25 22:22:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2006 17:22:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213904] Review Request: tclchecker - Tcl syntax checker In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611252222.kAPMMBTW003157@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tclchecker - Tcl syntax checker Alias: tclchecker https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213904 paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-11-25 17:22 EST ------- rpmlint results src.rpm - clear noarch.rpm - clear mock builds cleanly installs fine Review Spec file clear, uses UTF-8, US English No permission issues Docs included Consistent use of macros No problems with rpm deps No ownership issues APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 25 22:22:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2006 17:22:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217229] Review Request: libmpd - Music Player Daemon library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611252222.kAPMMk6g003230@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libmpd - Music Player Daemon library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217229 ------- Additional Comments From adrian at lisas.de 2006-11-25 17:22 EST ------- Sorry. I just saw that you changed the blocker bug to FE-REVIEW. Unfortunately I already imported it because I thought it was FE-ACCEPT. I will not request a build before you change it to FE-ACCEPT. Really sorry. I have updated the package in the CVS to include Requires: pkgconfig in the -devel package. Hope it is alright now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 25 22:26:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2006 17:26:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213905] Review Request: tcldebugger - Tcl debugging library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611252226.kAPMQjt0003382@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tcldebugger - Tcl debugging library Alias: tcldebugger https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213905 paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-11-25 17:26 EST ------- rpmlint clean (src and noarch) mock builds cleanly Review Valid license Spec in UTF 8, clear and US English No permissions or ownership problems Includes docs Consistent use of macros APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 25 22:31:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2006 17:31:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213902] Review Request: tclparser - Tcl syntax parser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611252231.kAPMVnpT003666@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tclparser - Tcl syntax parser Alias: tclparser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213902 paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-11-25 17:31 EST ------- Sorry about the lag, I've had all hells problems at this end (ranging from death of my buildsys due to a virus called XP to trying to get a job)... rpmlint clean mock clean Review License fine Consistent use of macros No permission or ownership problems Includes docs US English, clear, UTF 8 spec file As with the others, the date is a tad old (my fault for the delay), but it looks okay. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 25 23:11:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2006 18:11:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 211728] Review Request: stklos - Scheme Interpreter/Compiler System In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611252311.kAPNBBPR004750@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: stklos - Scheme Interpreter/Compiler System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211728 ------- Additional Comments From gemi at bluewin.ch 2006-11-25 18:10 EST ------- There is a new release: http://math.ifi.unizh.ch/fedora/6/i386/SRPMS.gemi/stklos-0.80-1.fc6.src.rpm However, I think we disagree about packaging the .h files. I don't want to separate them from the main package, since this would break installing extensions that need to be compiled. If we don't come to an agreement, we probably have to discuss this on the fedora-extras list. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 25 23:20:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2006 18:20:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217229] Review Request: libmpd - Music Player Daemon library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611252320.kAPNKtn8005132@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libmpd - Music Player Daemon library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217229 gauret at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From gauret at free.fr 2006-11-25 18:20 EST ------- No problem. If it has the proper "Requires" in CVS, just go ahead and build it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 25 23:31:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2006 18:31:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 211728] Review Request: stklos - Scheme Interpreter/Compiler System In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611252331.kAPNVGxu005383@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: stklos - Scheme Interpreter/Compiler System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211728 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-11-25 18:31 EST ------- Clean in mock and rpmlint as for the .h file. They need to be in a devel file. If another package needs them to build, drag in the devel package and not the main one. Feel free to discuss it on the extras list, but I have a feeling it's probably not worth it for adding in the devel package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 25 23:44:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2006 18:44:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216131] Review Request: glest-data - Data files for the game Glest In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611252344.kAPNikfK005615@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glest-data - Data files for the game Glest Alias: glest-data https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216131 ------- Additional Comments From gauret at free.fr 2006-11-25 18:44 EST ------- > - Why do you include SOURCE1 (glest-get-translations.sh) but do not install it? It is the script I used to make the translations tarball (SOURCE2). I included it for transparency, in case someone wants to know where SOURCE2 comes from and verify it. > - Change permissions on SOURCE1 to 755 Done. This is ususally harmless since it's the src.rpm (and the script is not installed in the build root) > - Add empty %build with a comment saying nothing to build I don't think this is a real problem. If rpmbuild accepts the spec file, then the %build section is optional. If it is optional, it's probably for a reason, and I think NoArch packages are why. > - data looks like it is not licensed as GPL. Please clarify with upstream Exact, the licence tag is wrong. The data files are "distributable". However, this complies with the Fedora Guidelines : http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Shareware Game content is allowed as long as it is distributable. On top of that, one of glest's main features is that it can be easily modified because the data files are XML. So I'm pretty sure you're allowed to modify it. I've already contacted upstream to ask them to clarify if the content may be modified. I'm still waiting for the reply, and I'll update the licence tag when I get it. > - add punctuation to description Done. New release : http://gauret.free.fr/fichiers/rpms/fedora/glest-data-2.0.0-2.src.rpm (give it a few minutes to upload) Thanks for the review -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 25 23:45:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2006 18:45:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 198836] Review Request: freetype1 compatibility FreeType 1.x In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611252345.kAPNjkwK005659@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: freetype1 compatibility FreeType 1.x https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198836 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-11-25 18:45 EST ------- Sorry for the delay - had all sorts of problems at this end. rpmlint - clean on all package (non main packages have no docs warnings, ignore) mock - clean REVIEW License - is BSD-like a valid type? Consistent use of macros Spec in UTF-8, US English, Clear No permission / ownership issues Contains documentation (see above) Contains reason for not using smp_make Removes .la files MD5s match for the tarballs Contains clean, pre and postuns No RPM dep issues If you can confirm that BSD-like is a valid license, I'm happy. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 26 01:14:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2006 20:14:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217256] New: Review Request: alsa-tools - Specialist tools for ALSA Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217256 Summary: Review Request: alsa-tools - Specialist tools for ALSA Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rpm at timj.co.uk QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.timj.co.uk/linux/specs/alsa-tools.spec SRPM URL: http://www.timj.co.uk/linux/srpms/alsa-tools-1.0.12-1.src.rpm Description: This package contains several specialist tools for use with ALSA, including a number of programs that provide access to special hardware facilities on certain sound cards. alsa-tools was previously built in FE and maintained by Thorsten Leemhuis. Then, Andreas Bierfert took ownership but never actually committed any changes. I tried to contact Andreas on 5 Nov 06 but have had no reply; he appears to be AWOL. I am therefore submitting an updated package for new review; if OK then I will unorphan alsa-tools. This package is almost entirely unchanged from the previous FE one other than a version update and some text changes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 26 01:20:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2006 20:20:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217256] Review Request: alsa-tools - Specialist tools for ALSA In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611260120.kAQ1KjUL007084@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: alsa-tools - Specialist tools for ALSA https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217256 ------- Additional Comments From rpm at timj.co.uk 2006-11-25 20:20 EST ------- Note that the subpackage alsa-tools-firmware is disabled by default; this is pending the alsa-firmware package which I am going to submit separately. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 26 01:44:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2006 20:44:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213902] Review Request: tclparser - Tcl syntax parser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611260144.kAQ1iVfq007848@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tclparser - Tcl syntax parser Alias: tclparser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213902 wart at kobold.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2006-11-25 20:44 EST ------- Thanks for following up on this, and thanks for the review! Imported and built, closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 26 01:44:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2006 20:44:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213905] Review Request: tcldebugger - Tcl debugging library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611260144.kAQ1iYrC007873@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tcldebugger - Tcl debugging library Alias: tcldebugger https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213905 Bug 213905 depends on bug 213902, which changed state. Bug 213902 Summary: Review Request: tclparser - Tcl syntax parser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213902 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 26 01:44:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2006 20:44:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213904] Review Request: tclchecker - Tcl syntax checker In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611260144.kAQ1iklb007888@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tclchecker - Tcl syntax checker Alias: tclchecker https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213904 Bug 213904 depends on bug 213902, which changed state. Bug 213902 Summary: Review Request: tclparser - Tcl syntax parser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213902 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 26 01:45:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2006 20:45:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213904] Review Request: tclchecker - Tcl syntax checker In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611260145.kAQ1jDnr007916@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tclchecker - Tcl syntax checker Alias: tclchecker https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213904 wart at kobold.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2006-11-25 20:45 EST ------- Imported and built. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 26 01:45:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2006 20:45:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213907] Review Request: tclpro - Tcl debugging environment In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611260145.kAQ1jZ8B007950@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tclpro - Tcl debugging environment Alias: tclpro https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213907 Bug 213907 depends on bug 213904, which changed state. Bug 213904 Summary: Review Request: tclchecker - Tcl syntax checker https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213904 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 26 01:45:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2006 20:45:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217259] New: Review Request: alsa-firmware - Firmware for several ALSA-supported sound card Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217259 Summary: Review Request: alsa-firmware - Firmware for several ALSA-supported sound card Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rpm at timj.co.uk QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.timj.co.uk/linux/specs/alsa-firmware.spec SRPM URL: http://www.timj.co.uk/linux/srpms/alsa-firmware-1.0.12-1.src.rpm Description: This package contains the firmware binaries for a number of sound cards. Some (but not all of these) require firmware loaders which are included in the alsa-tools-firmware package alsa-firmware has not been in Fedora since Fedora.us days, even though it is absolutely vital to make some soundcards usable. There are several possible issues: 1. licensing/distribution 2. compliance with Guidelines Let's take (1) first. Thorsten did a bit of background research on this and summarised in a private mail on 2 June 2006: ====================================================================== I took a closer look at the latest upstream package at ftp://ftp.alsa-project.org/pub/firmware/alsa-firmware-1.0.11.tar.bz2 It contains a file COPYING in the root with the GPL. And a README with --- LICENSE AND COPYRIGHT ===================== The files contained in this package is regarded as the example data for each alsa-tools program. Hence, their copyright and license follow basically to the definition of alsa-tools programs. The detailed license and copyright is found in README of each subdirectory. --- alsa-tools contains a lot of license files with the GPL (and once LGPL). Most subdirs contains README files with terms like --- COPYRIGHT ========= Copyright (c) 2003 Digigram SA Distributable under GPL. --- or --- COPYRIGHT ========= Copyright (c) RME Distributable under GPL. --- or --- COPYRIGHT ========= tascam_loader.ihx, tascam_loader.asm and an2131.asm: Available under GPL without restrictions. other firmware files: Copyright (c) 2003 Tascam / TEAC Corporation. Distributable under GPL. ====================================================================== This still stands with 1.0.12. So it appears to meet the requirements for Binary Firmware in the Guidelines. (It is also distributed with a number of other distros including Mandriva and OpenSUSE) 2. spot and Thorsten did some work with "file" to see if it met the requirement for "no executables". The most interesting one was: ./lib/firmware/mixart/miXart8.elf: ELF 32-bit MSB executable, PowerPC or cisco 4500, version 1 (SYSV), statically linked, not stripped Now this does appear to really be an ELF binary, but it is not +x and it doesn't appear to run on Linux: $ chmod +x miXart8.elf $ ./miXart8.elf bash: ./miXart8.elf: cannot execute binary file so I think we can say that is truly is firmware, and it just happens that this device uses a piece of firmware in ELF format. a "file $(find . -type f) | grep -v -e ASCII -e Bourne -e shell" also throws up some other bits that aren't "data" like: ./lib/firmware/digiface_firmware.bin: DOS executable (device driver) ./lib/firmware/digiface_firmware_rev11.bin: DOS executable (device driver) ./lib/firmware/ea/3g_asic.fw: PGP encrypted data but these appear to just be "file" noise. They appear to be genuine firmware, that's not executed on the host, so they should be fine. (and 3g_asic is not PGP data; that's just what happens when you chuck lots of random stuff at "file"). Last CVS from fedora.us days, which is largely unchanged here: http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/*checkout*/rpms/alsa-firmware/FC-5/alsa-firmware.spec?root=extras&rev=1.5 Package is listed on: http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/PackagesNoLongerInDevel?highlight=%28alsa-firmware%28 as "pending legal review" but there appears to be nothing happening and nobody tasked to do anything AFAICT. Given the above details, in the absence of a compelling reason, I don't see why this shouldn't be included in Fedora. I'm looking to spot here to make a call or, if some kind of legal review really is needed, make this block FE-LEGAL and get someone's attention about it. Note that I only have one piece of hardware that this firmware supports (Echo Audio Indigo DJ) so any feedback from anyone else welcome. I have marked the package as "noarch"; since it's containing firmware it should be. However, given that the firmware is "compiled" from big strings and there's some fiddly stuff going on, I would appreciate some md5sums of the generated firmware from someone with ppc/x86_64 architectures just to make sure that the end result is the same. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 26 01:46:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2006 20:46:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213905] Review Request: tcldebugger - Tcl debugging library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611260146.kAQ1kCIq008024@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tcldebugger - Tcl debugging library Alias: tcldebugger https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213905 wart at kobold.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2006-11-25 20:46 EST ------- Imported and built. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 26 01:46:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2006 20:46:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213907] Review Request: tclpro - Tcl debugging environment In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611260146.kAQ1kQAm008056@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tclpro - Tcl debugging environment Alias: tclpro https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213907 Bug 213907 depends on bug 213905, which changed state. Bug 213905 Summary: Review Request: tcldebugger - Tcl debugging library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213905 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 26 01:47:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2006 20:47:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213907] Review Request: tclpro - Tcl debugging environment In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611260147.kAQ1lILA008087@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tclpro - Tcl debugging environment Alias: tclpro https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213907 wart at kobold.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2006-11-25 20:47 EST ------- Imported and built. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 26 01:47:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2006 20:47:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217259] Review Request: alsa-firmware - Firmware for several ALSA-supported sound card In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611260147.kAQ1lwmQ008152@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: alsa-firmware - Firmware for several ALSA-supported sound card https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217259 rpm at timj.co.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tmayberr at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From rpm at timj.co.uk 2006-11-25 20:47 EST ------- adding cc's from bug #186858 which this bug obsoletes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 26 01:48:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2006 20:48:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217256] Review Request: alsa-tools - Specialist tools for ALSA In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611260148.kAQ1mwqK008220@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: alsa-tools - Specialist tools for ALSA https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217256 ------- Additional Comments From rpm at timj.co.uk 2006-11-25 20:48 EST ------- Firmware is over in bug #217259 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 26 01:49:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2006 20:49:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217259] Review Request: alsa-firmware - Firmware for several ALSA-supported sound card In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611260149.kAQ1nwMl008260@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: alsa-firmware - Firmware for several ALSA-supported sound card https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217259 ------- Additional Comments From rpm at timj.co.uk 2006-11-25 20:49 EST ------- NB that alsa-tools-firmware (needed to push the firmware for some of the things in this package) is a subpackage of alsa-tools; see bug #217256 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 26 02:51:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2006 21:51:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216723] Review Request: libsieve - A library for parsing, sorting and filtering your mail In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611260251.kAQ2pLgL009199@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libsieve - A library for parsing, sorting and filtering your mail https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216723 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163776, 177841 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-11-25 21:51 EST ------- Moving this package status from FE-REVIEW to FE-NEW. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 26 02:51:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2006 21:51:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217256] Review Request: alsa-tools - Specialist tools for ALSA In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611260251.kAQ2pHqh009187@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: alsa-tools - Specialist tools for ALSA https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217256 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 26 03:10:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2006 22:10:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216723] Review Request: libsieve - A library for parsing, sorting and filtering your mail In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611260310.kAQ3A5IZ009563@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libsieve - A library for parsing, sorting and filtering your mail https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216723 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-11-25 22:09 EST ------- Now its looking better. rpmlints are silent now. More (unofficial)review will do later on. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 26 03:10:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2006 22:10:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217262] New: Review Request: tdom - DOM parser for Tcl Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217262 Summary: Review Request: tdom - DOM parser for Tcl Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: wart at kobold.org QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.kobold.org/~wart/fedora/tdom.spec SRPM URL: http://www.kobold.org/~wart/fedora/tdom-0.8.0-1.src.rpm Description: DOM parser for Tcl There is another package, tcldom, that provides similar functionality, but with a different API. Some Tcl applications are written for one Tcl DOM api or the other, so it would be good to include both in FE. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 26 04:03:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2006 23:03:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217256] Review Request: alsa-tools - Specialist tools for ALSA In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611260403.kAQ43HVj010945@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: alsa-tools - Specialist tools for ALSA https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217256 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-11-25 23:03 EST ------- I had a look at this package. Though rpmlint is silent i found /usr/share/doc/alsa-tools-1.0.12 directory is orphaned -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 26 06:18:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2006 01:18:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 211728] Review Request: stklos - Scheme Interpreter/Compiler System In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611260618.kAQ6IOsj016049@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: stklos - Scheme Interpreter/Compiler System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211728 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2006-11-26 01:18 EST ------- (In reply to comment #10) > Clean in mock and rpmlint Not clean outside of mock: # rpmbuild -ba stklos.spec ... gcc -shared -o gtklos.so gtk-glue.o gtk-canvas.o gtk-cont.o gtk-editable.o gtk-image.o gtk-label.o gtk-misc.o gtk-list.o gtk-signal.o gtk-event.o gtk-menu.o \ -rdynamic -L/usr/lib -lgdk_pixbuf -lgtk -lgdk -lgmodule -lglib -ldl -lXi -lXext -lX11 -lm -lgnomecanvaspixbuf /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lgnomecanvaspixbuf > as for the .h file. They need to be in a devel file. If another package needs > them to build, drag in the devel package and not the main one. > > Feel free to discuss it on the extras list, but I have a feeling it's probably > not worth it for adding in the devel package. Moving them into a *-devel package is a MUST. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 26 06:41:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2006 01:41:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217197] Review Request: MyBashBurn 1.0-1 - burn data and songs. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611260641.kAQ6fRvl016515@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: MyBashBurn 1.0-1 - burn data and songs. Alias: MyBashBurn https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217197 wilmer at fedoraproject.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: MyBashBurn |Review Request: MyBashBurn |0.1 - burn data and songs. |1.0-1 - burn data and songs. OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | Alias| |MyBashBurn ------- Additional Comments From wilmer at fedoraproject.org 2006-11-26 01:41 EST ------- okay, it's good to hear from you, just now added myself on FE-NEEDSPONSOR. I'm uploading the new SRPM and SPEC files, note that i decided change this initial release to 1.0-1 for compatibility with the PackagingGuidelines and NamingGuidelines. In the spec file the line install -c -m666 this is needed to that every user can to do read-write operations, in next realease i think to split it into of program in some as: ~/.bashburnrc CREDITS and HOWTO are duplicate as on %{doc} as %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/%{name} In %{doc} for compatibility with the guidelines In %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/%{name} why the program need read it there. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 26 06:48:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2006 01:48:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 212715] Review Request: openvrml - VRML/X3D runtime library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611260648.kAQ6mo3D016667@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: openvrml - VRML/X3D runtime library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212715 ------- Additional Comments From braden at endoframe.com 2006-11-26 01:48 EST ------- Please report any outstanding issues as new bugs. Also note my suggestion in comment #24. (And see bug 157279.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 26 07:04:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2006 02:04:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217197] Review Request: MyBashBurn 1.0-1 - burn data and songs. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611260704.kAQ74frJ016982@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: MyBashBurn 1.0-1 - burn data and songs. Alias: MyBashBurn https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217197 ------- Additional Comments From wilmer at fedoraproject.org 2006-11-26 02:04 EST ------- the new files uploaded: Spec URL: http://www.fedora-ve.org/mybashburn/downloads/mybashburn.spec SRPM URL: http://www.fedora-ve.org/mybashburn/downloads/mybashburn-1.0-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 26 07:08:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2006 02:08:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 198836] Review Request: freetype1 compatibility FreeType 1.x In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611260708.kAQ78ZBL017069@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: freetype1 compatibility FreeType 1.x https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198836 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-11-26 02:08 EST ------- Well rpmlint likes it, so I assume its a valid license, I took this from the spec initially created by the core freetype maintainer. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 26 07:18:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2006 02:18:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217249] Review Request: atomorun - Jump&Run game where you have to flee an exploding nuclear bomb In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611260718.kAQ7IipO017229@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: atomorun - Jump&Run game where you have to flee an exploding nuclear bomb Alias: atomorun https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217249 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-11-26 02:18 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > ==== MUST FIX ==== > - Add Requires: icons-hicolor-theme to pull in icons directory > /me stupid, doh New version with this fixed here: Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/atomorun.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/atomorun-1.1-0.2.pre2.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 26 08:44:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2006 03:44:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 208113] Review Request: freepops - a tool to get html mail through a pop daemon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611260844.kAQ8ivec019061@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: freepops - a tool to get html mail through a pop daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208113 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-11-26 03:44 EST ------- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 26 08:54:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2006 03:54:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217232] Review Request: keyTouch In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611260854.kAQ8s6dS019816@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: keyTouch https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217232 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-11-26 03:54 EST ------- Denis, would you upload and specify your spec file and srpm you created for this package? Otherwise no one can review this package. Also, it seems that you need a sponsor. Please check: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/HowToGetSponsored -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 26 09:07:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2006 04:07:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215224] Review Request: gtk-murrine-engine - Murrine GTK2 engine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611260907.kAQ97VfM021289@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtk-murrine-engine - Murrine GTK2 engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215224 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-11-26 04:07 EST ------- Well, this package (gtk-murrine-engine) is okay. Then the last issue remained is that you have to get sponsored. Please follow my comment #23 and comment #24 . When you have pre-reviewed or submitted other package, please let me know. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 26 09:29:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2006 04:29:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 211626] Review Request: xtide - Calculate tide all over the world In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611260929.kAQ9Tf7r007051@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xtide - Calculate tide all over the world https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211626 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-11-26 04:29 EST ------- Well, for tideEditor-desktop.sh, David mailed to me: ------------------------------------------------------ For tideEditor-desktop.sh I have the concern that the user who invokes it will not realize that the edits are occurring to a local copy and won't show up in XTide without changing HFILE_PATH. ------------------------------------------------------ Patrice, how do you think of this? * I think that providing tideEditor desktop is preferable and in that case a local copy of tcd file is necessary as tideEditor requires tcd data to be launched. * If copying tcd file to local with silence should be avoided, then providing tideEditor desktop should be stopped accordingly, however, perhaps it is not preferred. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 26 09:32:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2006 04:32:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 211728] Review Request: stklos - Scheme Interpreter/Compiler System In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611260932.kAQ9WNMu007175@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: stklos - Scheme Interpreter/Compiler System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211728 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-11-26 04:32 EST ------- It came up completely clean on my buildsys under mock and rpmlint. However, as there is a sticking point over the need for a devel package, that can get sorted when the subpackage appears. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 26 10:17:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2006 05:17:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 211626] Review Request: xtide - Calculate tide all over the world In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611261017.kAQAH2vI008835@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xtide - Calculate tide all over the world https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211626 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-11-26 05:17 EST ------- (In reply to comment #93) > Well, for tideEditor-desktop.sh, David mailed to me: > > ------------------------------------------------------ > For tideEditor-desktop.sh I have the concern that the user who invokes > it will not realize that the edits are occurring to a local copy and > won't show up in XTide without changing HFILE_PATH. > ------------------------------------------------------ > > Patrice, how do you think of this? I think that David is right. As long as there is no file chooser it is not very convenient to start tideEditor without command line argument. So I think the best would be to drop the wrapper and .desktop file, tideEditor users are certainly knowledgable enough to be able to open a shell to launch tideEditor. This is against the guidelines, but I think this is acceptable since tideEditor is not meant to be started without argument. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 26 10:34:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2006 05:34:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217275] New: Review Request: ocsinventory-client - Open Computer and Software Inventory Next Generation client Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217275 Summary: Review Request: ocsinventory-client - Open Computer and Software Inventory Next Generation client Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: Fedora at FamilleCollet.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://remi.collet.free.fr/rpms/extras/ocsinventory-client.spec SRPM URL: http://remi.collet.free.fr/rpms/extras/ocsinventory-client-1.0-0.1.RC3.fc7.src.rpm Mock Log: http://remi.collet.free.fr/rpms/extras/ocsinventory-client-build.log Description: Open Computer and Software Inventory Next Generation is an application designed to help a network or system administrator keep track of computer configuration and software installed on the network. It also allows deploying softwares, commands or files on Windows and Linux client computers. ocsinventory-client provide the client agent for Linux. --- Patch used have be send upstream. rpmlint warning due to DEVIDE_ID generation (using date): W: ocsinventory-client percent-in-%post To test simply run "ocsinventory-client.pl -xml" and read /var/log/ocsinventory-client/xxx.ocs I also work on ocsinventory-*-server (lot of more job) I don't know if i should create a separate perl-Ocsinventory-Agent as this extension is only use by this client. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 26 11:05:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2006 06:05:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 211626] Review Request: xtide - Calculate tide all over the world In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611261105.kAQB50HR012441@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xtide - Calculate tide all over the world https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211626 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-11-26 06:04 EST ------- (In reply to comment #94) > (In reply to comment #93) > > Patrice, how do you think of this? > > I think that David is right. As long as there is no file chooser > it is not very convenient to start tideEditor without command line > argument. Actually I have no objection to drop desktop file so I will drop it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 26 12:04:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2006 07:04:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217275] Review Request: ocsinventory-client - Open Computer and Software Inventory Next Generation client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611261204.kAQC4anJ013775@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocsinventory-client - Open Computer and Software Inventory Next Generation client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217275 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pertusus at free.fr ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-11-26 07:04 EST ------- * I think that in the comment explaining what ocstag and ocsserver I think that you should put a reference to the README. Something along # Can, optionaly, be defined at build time (see README) * instead of dos2unix, you can use sed -i 's/\r//' And similarly you can use sed instead perl to do the simple substitution, like sed -i -e 's|PATH_TO_LOG_DIRECTORY|%{_localstatedir}/log/%{name}|' logrotate.ocsinventory-client * I think that the README.fedora should be split in a README.fedora and README.fedora.fr, tagged like %lang(fr) %doc README.fedora.fr -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 26 12:23:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2006 07:23:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217277] New: Review Request: libtcd - Tide Constituent Database Library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217277 Summary: Review Request: libtcd - Tide Constituent Database Library Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~mtasaka/dist/packages/xtide/SPECS/libtcd.spec SRPM URL: http://www.ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~mtasaka/dist/packages/xtide/SRPMS/libtcd-2.2-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: libtcd provides a software API for reading and writing Tide Constituent Database (TCD) files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 26 12:25:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2006 07:25:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217278] New: Review Request: tcd-utils - TCD (Tide Constituent Database) Utils Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217278 Summary: Review Request: tcd-utils - TCD (Tide Constituent Database) Utils Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~mtasaka/dist/packages/xtide/SPECS/tcd-utils.spec SRPM URL: http://www.ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~mtasaka/dist/packages/xtide/SRPMS/ Description: TCD Utils includes: * build_tide_db to convert harmonics.txt, offsets.xml, and NAVO formats to harmonics.tcd; * restore_tide_db to generate harmonics.txt and offsets.xml from harmonics.tcd -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 26 12:26:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2006 07:26:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217279] New: Review Request: tideEditor - Editor for Tide Constituent Database (TCD) files Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217279 Summary: Review Request: tideEditor - Editor for Tide Constituent Database (TCD) files Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~mtasaka/dist/packages/xtide/SPECS/tideEditor.spec SRPM URL: http://www.ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~mtasaka/dist/packages/xtide/SRPMS/tideEditor-1.3.12-2.fc7.src.rpm Description: tideEditor is an editor for Tide Constituent Database (TCD) files. It was written by Jan C. Depner but is now jointly maintained by David Flater and Jan Depner. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 26 12:28:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2006 07:28:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217278] Review Request: tcd-utils - TCD (Tide Constituent Database) Utils In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611261228.kAQCSIOm014543@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tcd-utils - TCD (Tide Constituent Database) Utils https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217278 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pertusus at free.fr, | |dave at flaterco.com BugsThisDependsOn| |217277 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-11-26 07:28 EST ------- srpm is: http://www.ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~mtasaka/dist/packages/xtide/SRPMS/tcd-utils-20061120-1.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 26 12:28:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2006 07:28:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217277] Review Request: libtcd - Tide Constituent Database Library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611261228.kAQCSTZK014587@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libtcd - Tide Constituent Database Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217277 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |217278 nThis| | OtherBugsDependingO| |217279 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 26 12:28:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2006 07:28:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217277] Review Request: libtcd - Tide Constituent Database Library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611261228.kAQCSdjg014601@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libtcd - Tide Constituent Database Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217277 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |217278 nThis| | OtherBugsDependingO| |217279 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 26 12:30:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2006 07:30:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 211626] Review Request: xtide - Calculate tide all over the world In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611261230.kAQCUJaY014647@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xtide - Calculate tide all over the world https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211626 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |217277 OtherBugsDependingO| |217279 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 26 12:30:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2006 07:30:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217277] Review Request: libtcd - Tide Constituent Database Library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611261230.kAQCUVps014662@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libtcd - Tide Constituent Database Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217277 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |211626 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 26 12:30:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2006 07:30:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217279] Review Request: tideEditor - Editor for Tide Constituent Database (TCD) files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611261230.kAQCUhVV014679@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tideEditor - Editor for Tide Constituent Database (TCD) files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217279 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |211626 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 26 12:32:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2006 07:32:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217229] Review Request: libmpd - Music Player Daemon library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611261232.kAQCWWaw014729@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libmpd - Music Player Daemon library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217229 adrian at lisas.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From adrian at lisas.de 2006-11-26 07:32 EST ------- Aurelien, thanks a lot. Package has been build for devel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 26 12:33:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2006 07:33:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217277] Review Request: libtcd - Tide Constituent Database Library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611261233.kAQCXiZS014766@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libtcd - Tide Constituent Database Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217277 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |pertusus at free.fr OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 26 12:36:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2006 07:36:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217249] Review Request: atomorun - Jump&Run game where you have to flee an exploding nuclear bomb In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611261236.kAQCaFUm014888@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: atomorun - Jump&Run game where you have to flee an exploding nuclear bomb Alias: atomorun https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217249 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2006-11-26 07:36 EST ------- All MUST items fixed, APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 26 12:49:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2006 07:49:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217277] Review Request: libtcd - Tide Constituent Database Library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611261249.kAQCnUbi015159@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libtcd - Tide Constituent Database Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217277 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-11-26 07:49 EST ------- * name right * follow guidelines, legible * license is free software, COPYING included * source match upstream d6cfa1b0d808d5772c9b2798b8a90df0 libtcd-2.2.tar.bz2 * %files section right * library properly packaged * directory owning is right As I said in another post I think that in this a case where keeping the static library makes sense since it could be used to handle trusted data in numerical experiments where compiling statically enhance portability. You can keep it out, as long as you respond favorably to users asking to have it back. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 26 13:09:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2006 08:09:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217278] Review Request: tcd-utils - TCD (Tide Constituent Database) Utils In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611261309.kAQD9F9d015556@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tcd-utils - TCD (Tide Constituent Database) Utils https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217278 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-11-26 08:09 EST ------- * right name * license right, COPYING included * source match upstream f0d58145520be7eeaf5d78229dae4aa7 tcd-utils-20061120.tar.bz2 * %files right * rpmlint is silent APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 26 13:10:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2006 08:10:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217278] Review Request: tcd-utils - TCD (Tide Constituent Database) Utils In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611261310.kAQDACCW015599@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tcd-utils - TCD (Tide Constituent Database) Utils https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217278 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |pertusus at free.fr OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163779 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 26 13:17:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2006 08:17:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 211626] Review Request: xtide - Calculate tide all over the world In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611261317.kAQDHa6p015764@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xtide - Calculate tide all over the world https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211626 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-11-26 08:17 EST ------- spec, srpm is updated. http://www.ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~mtasaka/dist/packages/xtide/SRPMS/xtide-2.9-0.2.date20061122.fc7.src.rpm http://www.ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~mtasaka/dist/packages/xtide/SPECS/xtide.spec * Sun Nov 26 2006 Mamoru Tasaka - 2.9-0.2.date20061122 - Ensure the hardcorded directories in some scripts can be appropriately changed. - Fix some typo in README.fedora Also, (as you have noticed) I submitted libtcd tcd-utils tideEditor review requests. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 26 13:26:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2006 08:26:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217275] Review Request: ocsinventory-client - Open Computer and Software Inventory Next Generation client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611261326.kAQDQp8D016014@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocsinventory-client - Open Computer and Software Inventory Next Generation client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217275 ------- Additional Comments From Fedora at FamilleCollet.com 2006-11-26 08:26 EST ------- Patrice, Thanks for the comments Spec URL: http://remi.collet.free.fr/rpms/extras/ocsinventory-client.spec SRPM URL: http://remi.collet.free.fr/rpms/extras/ocsinventory-client-1.0-0.2.RC3.fc7.src.rpm %changelog * Sun Nov 26 2006 Remi Collet 1.0-0.2.RC3 - replace perl and dos2unix by sed - split README.fedora -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 26 13:35:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2006 08:35:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 211626] Review Request: xtide - Calculate tide all over the world In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611261335.kAQDZLTa016247@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xtide - Calculate tide all over the world https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211626 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-11-26 08:35 EST ------- * rpmlint gives the ignorable W: xtide incoherent-init-script-name xttpd * name and release right * follow guidelines, legible * free software license, included * desktop file present for X app * init file right for daemon * right use of macros. Not used for files in xtide-common, but the files are fedora specific * match upstream efc6b3eb603e5b51c13c5dbb7bd29548 xtide-2.9dev-20061122.tar.bz2 * %files section right Using cvs snapshot should, in general, be avoided, but in that case it is the way to go given that new things are needed, and also that David worked with us. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 26 13:48:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2006 08:48:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217278] Review Request: tcd-utils - TCD (Tide Constituent Database) Utils In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611261348.kAQDmcgo016737@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tcd-utils - TCD (Tide Constituent Database) Utils https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217278 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-11-26 08:48 EST ------- If the mkdir under install required? make install should do this automatically. I take it that this built fine in mock as well. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 26 14:18:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2006 09:18:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217256] Review Request: alsa-tools - Specialist tools for ALSA In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611261418.kAQEIFVD018553@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: alsa-tools - Specialist tools for ALSA https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217256 ------- Additional Comments From rpm at timj.co.uk 2006-11-26 09:18 EST ------- Thanks, that was subtle: I hadn't spotted that. Fixed in an updated spec file (I haven't bothered to re-upload the whole SRPM for that one-liner). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 26 14:23:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2006 09:23:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215224] Review Request: gtk-murrine-engine - Murrine GTK2 engine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611261423.kAQENXb1018761@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtk-murrine-engine - Murrine GTK2 engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215224 ------- Additional Comments From sdl.web at gmail.com 2006-11-26 09:23 EST ------- (In reply to comment #25) > Well, this package (gtk-murrine-engine) is okay. > Then the last issue remained is that you have to get sponsored. > > Please follow my comment #23 and comment #24 . > When you have pre-reviewed or submitted other package, please let > me know. I'll submit one on 2 Dec. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 26 14:25:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2006 09:25:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217256] Review Request: alsa-tools - Specialist tools for ALSA In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611261425.kAQEPF76018808@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: alsa-tools - Specialist tools for ALSA https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217256 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-11-26 09:25 EST ------- Mock build for i386 devel failed => checking for ENVY24CONTROL... configure: error: Package requirements (gtk+-2.0 alsa >= 0.9.0) were not met: No package 'gtk+-2.0' found Consider adjusting the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable if you installed software in a non-standard prefix. Alternatively, you may set the environment variables ENVY24CONTROL_CFLAGS and ENVY24CONTROL_LIBS to avoid the need to call pkg-config. See the pkg-config man page for more details. error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.87484 (%build) I think you should bother now to again update release and submit new download links for this modified package. You need to add gtk2-devel as Build Requires -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 26 15:22:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2006 10:22:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217180] Review Request: wbxml2 - WBXML parser and compiler library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611261522.kAQFM6W8019929@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wbxml2 - WBXML parser and compiler library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217180 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-11-26 10:22 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (development i386) for FC6. + rpmlint is silent for RPM and SRPM. + source files match upstream. 67a48fd9b69db8818a4dca5375c7993a wbxml2-0.9.2.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named and is cleanly written. + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. License text included in package. + %doc is small; no -doc subpackage required. + %doc does not affect runtime. + COPYING included in %doc. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + libwbxml2.pc file present. + -devel subpackage exists + no .la files. + no translations are available. + owns the directories it creates. + doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 26 15:25:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2006 10:25:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217180] Review Request: wbxml2 - WBXML parser and compiler library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611261525.kAQFPpmi020019@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wbxml2 - WBXML parser and compiler library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217180 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-11-26 10:25 EST ------- Don't forget to CLOSE this bug with resolution NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 26 15:31:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2006 10:31:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217277] Review Request: libtcd - Tide Constituent Database Library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611261531.kAQFV4WP020179@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libtcd - Tide Constituent Database Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217277 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-11-26 10:31 EST ------- * Rebuild for FE-devel succeeded. * SyncNeeded is requested for FE5/6. Now I close this bug as CLOSED NEXTRELEASE. Thank you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 26 15:31:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2006 10:31:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 211626] Review Request: xtide - Calculate tide all over the world In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611261531.kAQFVaQA020215@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xtide - Calculate tide all over the world https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211626 Bug 211626 depends on bug 217277, which changed state. Bug 217277 Summary: Review Request: libtcd - Tide Constituent Database Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217277 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 26 15:31:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2006 10:31:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217278] Review Request: tcd-utils - TCD (Tide Constituent Database) Utils In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611261531.kAQFVw3X020234@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tcd-utils - TCD (Tide Constituent Database) Utils https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217278 Bug 217278 depends on bug 217277, which changed state. Bug 217277 Summary: Review Request: libtcd - Tide Constituent Database Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217277 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 26 15:32:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2006 10:32:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217279] Review Request: tideEditor - Editor for Tide Constituent Database (TCD) files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611261532.kAQFW9x2020247@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tideEditor - Editor for Tide Constituent Database (TCD) files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217279 Bug 217279 depends on bug 217277, which changed state. Bug 217277 Summary: Review Request: libtcd - Tide Constituent Database Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217277 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 26 15:34:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2006 10:34:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217278] Review Request: tcd-utils - TCD (Tide Constituent Database) Utils In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611261534.kAQFYbtC020287@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tcd-utils - TCD (Tide Constituent Database) Utils https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217278 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-11-26 10:34 EST ------- * Rebuild for FE-devel succeeded. * SyncNeeded is requested for FE5/6. Now I close this bug as CLOSED NEXTRELEASE. Thank you. (In reply to comment #3) > If the mkdir under install required? make install should do this automatically. > I take it that this built fine in mock as well. > It may be unneeded, however, this is my habit... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 26 15:36:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2006 10:36:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216517] Review Request: gnome-valgrind-session - Run an entire GNOME session under valgrind In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611261536.kAQFaroa020365@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-valgrind-session - Run an entire GNOME session under valgrind https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216517 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-11-26 10:36 EST ------- Update SPEC file for working Source tarball link. Tarball contains backup copy of gnome-valgrind-errors-postprocess as gnome-valgrind-errors-postprocess~. That should be removed. However it will be good to have License copy included in tarball. Can you update new SRPM with above changes? Then i will do review of this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 26 15:39:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2006 10:39:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 198839] Review Request: sear - WorldForge client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611261539.kAQFdr3v020491@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sear - WorldForge client Alias: sear https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198839 Bug 198839 depends on bug 213282, which changed state. Bug 213282 Summary: SDL_image crashed on IMG_ReadXPMFromArray https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213282 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 26 15:40:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2006 10:40:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216517] Review Request: gnome-valgrind-session - Run an entire GNOME session under valgrind In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611261540.kAQFe7oc020534@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-valgrind-session - Run an entire GNOME session under valgrind https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216517 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-11-26 10:40 EST ------- You should always give updated SPEC and SRPM links. I saw that you updates SPEC in comment 2 but where is its SRPM? Now you should submit gnome-valgrind-session-1.0-3.src.rpm and its spec. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 26 15:43:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2006 10:43:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216734] Review Request: gnome-compiz-manager - compiz configuration utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611261543.kAQFh41J020616@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-compiz-manager - compiz configuration utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216734 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-11-26 10:43 EST ------- any progress? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 26 15:50:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2006 10:50:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 182173] Review Request: eterm - a color vt102 terminal emulator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611261550.kAQFobQF020763@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eterm - a color vt102 terminal emulator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=182173 terjeros at phys.ntnu.no changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 26 18:03:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2006 13:03:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 200722] Review Request: GraphicsMagick In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611261803.kAQI3Wtm023924@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: GraphicsMagick https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200722 ------- Additional Comments From andreas at bawue.net 2006-11-26 13:03 EST ------- Package has been updated at the usual location. Please take a look. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 26 18:37:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2006 13:37:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 199920] Review Request: Palantir In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611261837.kAQIbbqo024615@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Palantir https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199920 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |201449 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 26 18:38:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2006 13:38:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 199919] Review Request: Asuka In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611261838.kAQIcjLI024694@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Asuka https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199919 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |201449 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 26 18:47:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2006 13:47:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 201418] Review Request: widelands - GPL Settlers II clone In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611261847.kAQIlk9A024928@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: widelands - GPL Settlers II clone https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201418 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-11-26 13:47 EST ------- Hello, ping? I'm getting kinda tired of this. So its time for some new rules of engagement, I expect you to respond (not resolve, but respond) to any of my comments within a week from now on, or otherwise I'm going to close this and the glob2 review as FE-DEADREVIEW (see: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/Policy/StalledReviews ) and its game over for you as far as getting sponsored by me is concered. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 26 18:51:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2006 13:51:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217249] Review Request: atomorun - Jump&Run game where you have to flee an exploding nuclear bomb In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611261851.kAQIpo8d025027@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: atomorun - Jump&Run game where you have to flee an exploding nuclear bomb Alias: atomorun https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217249 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-11-26 13:51 EST ------- Thanks, imported and building as we speak, closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 26 20:12:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2006 15:12:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215165] Review Request: audacious-plugins - Plugins for the Audacious media player In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611262012.kAQKCNDs026931@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: audacious-plugins - Plugins for the Audacious media player https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215165 redhat-bugzilla at camperquake.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 26 20:12:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2006 15:12:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214818] Review Request: audacious - A GTK2 based media player similar to xmms In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611262012.kAQKCmfs026969@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: audacious - A GTK2 based media player similar to xmms https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214818 redhat-bugzilla at camperquake.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 26 20:13:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2006 15:13:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215165] Review Request: audacious-plugins - Plugins for the Audacious media player In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611262013.kAQKDAxS026990@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: audacious-plugins - Plugins for the Audacious media player https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215165 Bug 215165 depends on bug 214818, which changed state. Bug 214818 Summary: Review Request: audacious - A GTK2 based media player similar to xmms https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214818 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 26 20:13:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2006 15:13:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217278] Review Request: tcd-utils - TCD (Tide Constituent Database) Utils In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611262013.kAQKDKch027009@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tcd-utils - TCD (Tide Constituent Database) Utils https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217278 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-11-26 15:13 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > It may be unneeded, however, this is my habit... If it is unneeded, it is better to leave it out, since less code means better readability and maintainability, and your specs may be used by others as template. Not a blocker, though. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 26 21:32:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2006 16:32:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 201418] Review Request: widelands - GPL Settlers II clone In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611262132.kAQLW3Ag028608@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: widelands - GPL Settlers II clone https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201418 ------- Additional Comments From brkamikaze at gmail.com 2006-11-26 16:31 EST ------- I am checking out the latest revision and will (hopefully) compile and run it today. If successful, I will upload the new SRPM. I will also see if any developers have already applied this patch or not and submit it if needed. Why do developers keep putting extra qualification on C++ code? I'm hoping that upstream will release a new stable really soon; it's not very good to work with CVS/SVN. Due to some studies I'm having even less time to work on this. I will keep working on it while I'm able to, but I may mark the bug as FE-DEADREVIEW if I get even more busy. Sorry to keep you guys waiting. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 26 21:43:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2006 16:43:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217256] Review Request: alsa-tools - Specialist tools for ALSA In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611262143.kAQLhPSk028949@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: alsa-tools - Specialist tools for ALSA https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217256 ------- Additional Comments From rpm at timj.co.uk 2006-11-26 16:43 EST ------- Thanks, fixed, sorry, I forgot to run it through mock. Builds now fine in mock. Spec URL: http://www.timj.co.uk/linux/specs/alsa-tools.spec SRPM URL: http://www.timj.co.uk/linux/srpms/alsa-tools-1.0.12-3.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 26 21:45:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2006 16:45:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217279] Review Request: tideEditor - Editor for Tide Constituent Database (TCD) files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611262145.kAQLjwHA029006@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tideEditor - Editor for Tide Constituent Database (TCD) files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217279 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-11-26 16:45 EST ------- * rpmlint is silent * name right * free software license, included * source match upstream f833a2b7ccd4721c719642845ec2da47 tideEditor-1.3.12.tar.bz2 * %files right Needswork: Are the buildrequires expat-devel, lcms-devel, libXfixes-devel required? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 26 22:12:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2006 17:12:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217279] Review Request: tideEditor - Editor for Tide Constituent Database (TCD) files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611262212.kAQMCN4I029802@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tideEditor - Editor for Tide Constituent Database (TCD) files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217279 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |pertusus at free.fr OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 26 22:18:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2006 17:18:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215256] Review Request: firefox-32 - Alternate Launcher for 32bit Firefox In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611262218.kAQMIZOX029955@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: firefox-32 - Alternate Launcher for 32bit Firefox Alias: firefox-32 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215256 ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2006-11-26 17:18 EST ------- > - install desktop files with desktop-file-install in %install Why is this necessary? > - Why not use the firefox icon if firefox is a requirement? > I think firefox.png would be better than redhat-web-browser.png > - Why not use mozilla-firefox-32.desktop as the filename to be > consistent with the firefox package? I am hesitant to do this because it is politically sensitive that this package exists at all and I don't want to bother arguing with the Mozilla Corporation about using their icon here. I would be happy to use another icon if someone provides one that looks attractive. > - Consider also using the mozilla-firefox.desktop file's Name, > Generic Name and Comment fields to use as a template for the > firefox32 .desktop file. I think the 32 bit version should have > the same icon/description as the 64 bit version in order to make > it consistent and easier to find. Aside from the reason above, doing this would not work fully as expected due to the many translations. In my opinion it is totally not worth the effort to do any of this .desktop branding improvements. However, I will accept contributions to improve this if someone goes through the effort to do it the right way. rpmlint on SRPM: > W: firefox-32 strange-permission setup-firefox-32.sh 0755 rpmlint on RPM: > E: firefox-32 only-non-binary-in-usr-lib > W: firefox-32 no-documentation > W: firefox-32 one-line-command-in-%trigger /usr/lib/firefox-32/setup-firefox-32.sh /tmp/firefox-32-0.0.1-3.i386.rpm.3552/usr/share/applications/firefox-32.desktop: warning: boolean key "Terminal" has value "0", boolean values should be "false" or "true", although "0" and "1" are allowed in this field for backwards compatibility I am going to ignore these as they are not a problem. http://togami.com/~warren/fedora/firefox-32-0.0.1-2.src.rpm http://togami.com/~warren/fedora/firefox-32.spec * Sun Nov 26 2006 Warren Togami - 0.0.1-3 - change license to Public Domain - own firefox-32 directory - fix .desktop file s/True/true/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 26 22:34:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2006 17:34:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217275] Review Request: ocsinventory-client - Open Computer and Software Inventory Next Generation client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611262234.kAQMYdj4030402@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocsinventory-client - Open Computer and Software Inventory Next Generation client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217275 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-11-26 17:34 EST ------- * %{buildroot} is used everywhere, so I guess $RPM_OPT_FLAGS should be changed to %{optflags}. * there are some unowned directory issues, %{_sysconfdir}/logrotate.d/ and %{_sysconfdir}/cron.daily/ (owned by logrotate and crontabs). There was a thread about that issue on fedora-devel-list, I have no particular opinion on what is the right solution. * from looking in the script, seems like there is a missing Requires: perl(HTTP::Request) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 26 22:35:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2006 17:35:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217256] Review Request: alsa-tools - Specialist tools for ALSA In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611262235.kAQMZtvG030439@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: alsa-tools - Specialist tools for ALSA https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217256 ------- Additional Comments From triad at df.lth.se 2006-11-26 17:35 EST ------- I have this special thing in my /etc/rc.local that loads instruments to the OPL3 if one is found during startup: #!/bin/sh # Load MIDI instruments to the OPL3, if there is one. # Use "aplaymidi -l", "aplaymidi -p nn:nn foo.mid" to test it. midiport=`/usr/bin/aplaymidi -l | grep OPL3 | awk '{print $1}'` if [ "x$midiport" != "x" ]; then /usr/bin/sbiload -p${midiport} --opl3 /usr/share/sounds/opl3/std.o3 /usr/share/sounds/opl3/drums.o3 echo "Loaded OPL3 Instruments" fi I wonder if one should actually put something like that into init.d and link it in from the rc.d:s. It would add a Requires:alsa-utils though. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 26 22:45:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2006 17:45:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217311] New: Review Request: xarchiver - Archive manager for Xfce Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217311 Summary: Review Request: xarchiver - Archive manager for Xfce Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fedora at christoph-wickert.de QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://home.arcor.de/christoph.wickert/fedora/extras/review/SPECS/xarchiver.spec SRPM URL: http://home.arcor.de/christoph.wickert/fedora/extras/review/SRPMS/xarchiver-0.4.2-0.2.rc2.fc7.src.rpm Description: Xarchiver is a lightweight GTK2 only frontend for manipulating arj, 7z, zip, rar, tar, bzip2, gzip, and RPM files. It allows you to create archives and add, extract, and delete files from them. Password protected archives in the arj, 7z, rar, and zip formats are supported. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 26 22:49:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2006 17:49:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 198098] Review Request: xarchiver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611262249.kAQMnTjX030793@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xarchiver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198098 fedora at christoph-wickert.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|WONTFIX |DUPLICATE OtherBugsDependingO|215241 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From fedora at christoph-wickert.de 2006-11-26 17:49 EST ------- Done. Removed blocker on thunar-archive-plugin. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 217311 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 26 22:49:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2006 17:49:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217311] Review Request: xarchiver - Archive manager for Xfce In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611262249.kAQMnqjt030828@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xarchiver - Archive manager for Xfce https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217311 fedora at christoph-wickert.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |splinux25 at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From fedora at christoph-wickert.de 2006-11-26 17:49 EST ------- *** Bug 198098 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 26 22:49:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2006 17:49:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215241] Review Request: thunar-archive-plugin - Archive plugin for the Thunar file manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611262249.kAQMnrDO030840@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: thunar-archive-plugin - Archive plugin for the Thunar file manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215241 fedora at christoph-wickert.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn|198098 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 26 22:54:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2006 17:54:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215256] Review Request: firefox-32 - Alternate Launcher for 32bit Firefox In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611262254.kAQMs1rF030944@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: firefox-32 - Alternate Launcher for 32bit Firefox Alias: firefox-32 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215256 ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2006-11-26 17:53 EST ------- Okay, everything looks good except for the .desktop file which according to the Packaging Guidelines needs to be installed with desktop-file-utils. Since you are limited on time, I have gone ahead and fixed this for you: SPEC: http://tkmame.retrogames.com/fedora-extras/firefox-32.spec SRPM: http://tkmame.retrogames.com/fedora-extras/firefox-32-0.0.1-4.src.rpm %changelog * Sun Nov 26 2006 Christopher Stone - 0.0.1-4 - Add desktop-file-install command to install .desktop entry - Modify .desktop entry to more closely match firefox - Add BuildArch: noarch If you are okay with my version and agree to use it I will go ahead and FE-ACCEPT this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 26 23:00:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2006 18:00:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215256] Review Request: firefox-32 - Alternate Launcher for 32bit Firefox In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611262300.kAQN0sFn031191@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: firefox-32 - Alternate Launcher for 32bit Firefox Alias: firefox-32 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215256 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 26 23:02:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2006 18:02:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215241] Review Request: thunar-archive-plugin - Archive plugin for the Thunar file manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611262302.kAQN2twV031314@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: thunar-archive-plugin - Archive plugin for the Thunar file manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215241 fedora at christoph-wickert.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |217311 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at christoph-wickert.de 2006-11-26 18:02 EST ------- Now that we have a Requires: on xarchiver, why not remove %dir %{_libexecdir}/thunar-archive-plugin/ from the packge? This would avoid the duplicate ownership of this dir by xarchiver and thuar-archive-plugin. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 26 23:03:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2006 18:03:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217311] Review Request: xarchiver - Archive manager for Xfce In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611262303.kAQN36JH031328@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xarchiver - Archive manager for Xfce https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217311 fedora at christoph-wickert.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |215241 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 26 23:32:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2006 18:32:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217311] Review Request: xarchiver - Archive manager for Xfce In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611262332.kAQNWVbW031957@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xarchiver - Archive manager for Xfce https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217311 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-11-26 18:32 EST ------- * The LEGGIMI file should certainly be tagged with: %lang(it) %doc LEGGIMI * I think that the icon should also be in /usr/share/icons/hicolor/48x48/apps/ since it is specific of the size (I guess it should also be kept in /usr/share/pixmap for the about). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 27 00:27:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2006 19:27:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 201418] Review Request: widelands - GPL Settlers II clone In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611270027.kAR0R66p000592@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: widelands - GPL Settlers II clone https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201418 ------- Additional Comments From brkamikaze at gmail.com 2006-11-26 19:27 EST ------- I don't have time to upload the SRPM because my connection is kinda slow and I need to turn off the computer. I uploaded the specfile, the desktop and icon files as a tarball and a script to checkout SVN and generate the code tarball to the following URLs: http://nikolai.thecodergeek.com/widelands/widelands.spec http://nikolai.thecodergeek.com/widelands/widelands-desktop-and-icon.tar.bz2 http://nikolai.thecodergeek.com/widelands/checkout-widelands.sh The tarball generated by the script should have a md5sum of "73633e94809d994521441c154b06f718", unless the script is buggy or tar messes with the file order. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 27 00:27:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2006 19:27:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216131] Review Request: glest-data - Data files for the game Glest In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611270027.kAR0R79v000613@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glest-data - Data files for the game Glest Alias: glest-data https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216131 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2006-11-26 19:26 EST ------- Ya, the %build issue has been discussed in detail, it was finally decided that it is safer to keep them in there even if they are not needed (see the php-pear spec template in the rpmdevtools package as an example). Everything else looks good. The link to the Shareware is good enough for me, so I'll go ahead and accept this now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 27 00:29:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2006 19:29:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216130] Review Request: glest - 3D real time strategy game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611270029.kAR0TW48000713@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glest - 3D real time strategy game Alias: glest https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216130 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn|216129 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 27 00:30:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2006 19:30:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216129] Review Request: xerces-c - Validating XML Parser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611270030.kAR0U4Qx000774@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xerces-c - Validating XML Parser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216129 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|216130 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 27 00:37:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2006 19:37:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215256] Review Request: firefox-32 - Alternate Launcher for 32bit Firefox In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611270037.kAR0bOb8001070@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: firefox-32 - Alternate Launcher for 32bit Firefox Alias: firefox-32 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215256 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2006-11-26 19:37 EST ------- thanks, done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 27 00:43:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2006 19:43:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216130] Review Request: glest - 3D real time strategy game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611270043.kAR0hCIf001362@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glest - 3D real time strategy game Alias: glest https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216130 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2006-11-26 19:42 EST ------- ==== REVIEW CHECKLIST ==== - rpmlint output clean - package named according to package naming guidelines - spec file name matches %{name} - package meets packaging guidelines - licensed with open source compatible license - license matches actual license - license file included in %doc - spec written in American english - spec legible - sources match upstream f7716da7a044dbe108c619b0f52621bb glest_source_2.0.0.zip - successfully compiles and builds on FC6 x86_64 - all build dependencies listed in BR - no locales - no shared libraries - package is not relocatable - package owns all directories it creates - directories it does not create owned by filesystem - no duplicates in %files - file permissions set properly - package contains proper %clean section - macro usage consistent - contains code - no large documentation - files in %doc do not affect runtime - no header files or static libraries - no pkgconfig files - no need for a devel subpackage - no .la files - GUI app contains proper .desktop file - package does not own files or directories owned by other packages APPROVED ==== SHOULD ==== - Add punctuation to %description. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 27 01:01:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2006 20:01:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217229] Review Request: libmpd - Music Player Daemon library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611270101.kAR11g7B002176@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libmpd - Music Player Daemon library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217229 ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2006-11-26 20:01 EST ------- Please don't forget to assign the review to yourself when you take or approve it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 27 02:52:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2006 21:52:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217279] Review Request: tideEditor - Editor for Tide Constituent Database (TCD) files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611270252.kAR2qkq9005607@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tideEditor - Editor for Tide Constituent Database (TCD) files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217279 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-11-26 21:52 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > Needswork: > Are the buildrequires expat-devel, lcms-devel, libXfixes-devel > required? Umm.. not needed. Maybe dependency changed? Anyway I removed them. http://www.ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~mtasaka/dist/packages/xtide/SPECS/tideEditor.spec http://www.ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~mtasaka/dist/packages/xtide/SRPMS/tideEditor-1.3.12-3.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 27 03:11:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2006 22:11:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 174377] Review Request: gnu-smalltalk - GNU Smalltalk In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611270311.kAR3BIBX006216@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnu-smalltalk - GNU Smalltalk https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174377 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-11-26 22:11 EST ------- Well, very quick look at this: * Why isn't %configure macro used in spec file? * Is exporting 'CCFLAGS' variable required? * make %{_smp_mflags} CFLAGS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS" The description CFLAGS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS" is not needed when %configure macro is used. * -devel package should not require ldconfig call. * %{_bindir}/gst-config The content of this file is incorrect as this contains --------------------------------------------- gst_libs='@LDPATH@ -lnsl -lm ' ---------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 27 04:42:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2006 23:42:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 198644] new package suggestion: keepass In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611270442.kAR4ggUF010947@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: new package suggestion: keepass https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198644 jpmahowald at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jpmahowald at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2006-11-26 23:42 EST ------- Needs some work: - don't use vendor tag - use BuildRequires and not BuildPreReq - Drop Requires: qt4 as rpm should figure out library dependencies - don't define Prefix - you do not need to define a version macro, merely specify the version in Version: tag I'm doubtful about the conditional Fedora build if. This spec will be maintained in Fedora version control anyway, the regular package spec stuff is not needed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 27 04:44:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2006 23:44:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217256] Review Request: alsa-tools - Specialist tools for ALSA In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611270444.kAR4iwAE011089@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: alsa-tools - Specialist tools for ALSA https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217256 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-11-26 23:44 EST ------- I think alsa-tools-1.0.13 is already released. How about updating package to that tarball? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 27 04:51:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2006 23:51:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217256] Review Request: alsa-tools - Specialist tools for ALSA In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611270451.kAR4pXst011533@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: alsa-tools - Specialist tools for ALSA https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217256 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-11-26 23:51 EST ------- Anyway you can also do that while importing/updating this package in CVS. Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and RPMS. + source file's md5sum is 7342056614623273abccb1cd38a674d8 alsa-tools-1.0.12-pruned.tar.bz2 + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. License text included in package. + %doc is small; no -doc subpackage required. + %doc does not affect runtime. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage exists + firmware subpackage though written in spec file its disabled. + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + Desktop files installed without desktop-files-install as its really not needed. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 27 06:04:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2006 01:04:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 200700] Review Request: clipsmm - A C++ interface to the CLIPS library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611270604.kAR64vac015022@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clipsmm - A C++ interface to the CLIPS library Alias: clipsmm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200700 rvinyard at cs.nmsu.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 27 06:10:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2006 01:10:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215883] Review Request: idioskopos - C++ Introspection Library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611270610.kAR6AF9t015238@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: idioskopos - C++ Introspection Library Alias: idioskopos https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215883 rvinyard at cs.nmsu.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |idioskopos -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 27 06:25:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2006 01:25:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 211728] Review Request: stklos - Scheme Interpreter/Compiler System In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611270625.kAR6PuHU015835@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: stklos - Scheme Interpreter/Compiler System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211728 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2006-11-27 01:25 EST ------- (In reply to comment #12) > It came up completely clean on my buildsys under mock and rpmlint. Note what I wrote: "Not clean outside of mock:" I.e. * this package doesn't rebuild in a normal user-environment * this package doesn't produce deterministic builds. Probably a missing BuildRequires/BuildConflicts and/or missing --enable/disable something somewhere. MUSTFIX. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 27 06:34:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2006 01:34:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217275] Review Request: ocsinventory-client - Open Computer and Software Inventory Next Generation client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611270634.kAR6Y7RJ016136@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocsinventory-client - Open Computer and Software Inventory Next Generation client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217275 ------- Additional Comments From Fedora at FamilleCollet.com 2006-11-27 01:34 EST ------- > there are some unowned directory issues, Yes. I don't have real opinion too. logrotate and cron are installed on must system. I don't like to add an require for them as alternatives exists and "virtual-requires" not. Spec URL: http://remi.collet.free.fr/rpms/extras/ocsinventory-client.spec SRPM URL: http://remi.collet.free.fr/rpms/extras/ocsinventory-client-1.0-0.3.RC3.fc7.src.rpm * Mon Nov 27 2006 Remi Collet 1.0-0.3.RC3 - $RPM_OPT_FLAGS changed to %%{optflags}. - add not detected Requires perl(HTTP::Request) P.S. I will be away for the next 2 days... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 27 07:01:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2006 02:01:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 174377] Review Request: gnu-smalltalk - GNU Smalltalk In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611270701.kAR71BXZ017029@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnu-smalltalk - GNU Smalltalk https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174377 ------- Additional Comments From bonzini at gnu.org 2006-11-27 02:01 EST ------- The last item is fixed by this upstream patch: --- orig/gst-config.in +++ mod/gst-config.in @@ -2,7 +2,6 @@ : ${prefix:=@prefix@} : ${exec_prefix:=@exec_prefix@} -gst_libs='@LDPATH@ @LIBS@' exec_prefix_set=no usage() @@ -69,6 +68,9 @@ while test $# -gt 0; do shift done +: ${pkglibdir:="@libdir@/@PACKAGE@"} +gst_libs="${pkglibdir} @LIBS@" + if test "$echo_prefix" = "yes"; then echo $prefix fi -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 27 07:03:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2006 02:03:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 200722] Review Request: GraphicsMagick In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611270703.kAR73esB017117@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: GraphicsMagick https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200722 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-11-27 02:03 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and RPMS. + source files match upstream. f75d830ca623bf10385b3ad62c48437a GraphicsMagick-1.1.7.tar.bz2 + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. License text included in package. + %doc is small; no -doc subpackage required. + %doc does not affect runtime. + COPYING included in %doc. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + .pc file present. + -devel,-c++, -c++-devel, -perl subpackages exists + as subpackages are packaging .so files post and postun called /sbin/ldconfig + no .la files. + no translations are available + Dose owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + perl subpackage followed perl packagaing. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 27 07:05:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2006 02:05:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217277] Review Request: libtcd - Tide Constituent Database Library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611270705.kAR750Re017188@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libtcd - Tide Constituent Database Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217277 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2006-11-27 02:04 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > As I said in another post I think that in this a case where > keeping the static library makes sense since it could be used to > handle trusted data in numerical experiments where compiling > statically enhance portability. You can keep it out, as long as > you respond favorably to users asking to have it back. Pertusus, please carefully read: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/StaticLinkage -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 27 07:39:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2006 02:39:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 185535] Review Request: lurker In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611270739.kAR7dQBP018253@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lurker https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=185535 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-11-27 02:39 EST ------- Well, what is the current status of this review request? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 27 08:04:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2006 03:04:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217275] Review Request: ocsinventory-client - Open Computer and Software Inventory Next Generation client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611270804.kAR84qnF018934@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocsinventory-client - Open Computer and Software Inventory Next Generation client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217275 ------- Additional Comments From Fedora at FamilleCollet.com 2006-11-27 03:04 EST ------- I will also change BuildRequires: dmidecode Requires: dmidecode to : BuildRequires: %{_sbindir}/dmidecode Requires: %{_sbindir}/dmidecode To allow build on older version (RHEL and FC) as dmidecode is provided by kernel-utils. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 27 08:09:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2006 03:09:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 198644] new package suggestion: keepass In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611270809.kAR89H7a019065@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: new package suggestion: keepass https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198644 ------- Additional Comments From giallu at gmail.com 2006-11-27 03:09 EST ------- Peter, are you going to submit this for inclusion, i.e. being its maintainer? in this case, you need to follow the procedure outlined in http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/Contributors -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 27 08:24:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2006 03:24:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217278] Review Request: tcd-utils - TCD (Tide Constituent Database) Utils In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611270824.kAR8ODjC019565@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tcd-utils - TCD (Tide Constituent Database) Utils https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217278 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-11-27 03:24 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > If it is unneeded, it is better to leave it out, since less > code means better readability and maintainability, and your > specs may be used by others as template. Not a blocker, though. As newer version (20061127) is released, I will check this version and remove 'mkdir /var/tmp/...' if it is possible (perhaps possible). Thank you, Patrice and Paul. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 27 08:58:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2006 03:58:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217277] Review Request: libtcd - Tide Constituent Database Library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611270858.kAR8w3Wl021546@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libtcd - Tide Constituent Database Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217277 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-11-27 03:58 EST ------- I know that perfectly. If your point is that a static library should be in libtcd-static, I agree, this is better. If it is another issue, please read the thread https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2006-November/msg00713.html All the points listed in Motivations are moot in case of the use I point out. And I will never ask FESCO about whether static libs should be shipped or not. I trust better my own judgment in that case, and I don't want to use FESCO time on reviews, they already have enough things to do. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 27 10:30:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2006 05:30:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 212715] Review Request: openvrml - VRML/X3D runtime library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611271030.kARAU14G027956@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: openvrml - VRML/X3D runtime library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212715 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2006-11-27 05:29 EST ------- (In reply to comment #26) > Please report any outstanding issues as new bugs. I'd bugzilla them, but there is still no openvrml component in bugzilla. > Also note my suggestion in comment #24. (And see bug 157279.) Been there, tried it (and many other things), but I can't spot anything obvious. "about:plugins" and accessing the plugin from inside firefox continue not to work for me, on different machines, on different accounts, with locally built rpms and with the official ones ;) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 27 10:55:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2006 05:55:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217278] Review Request: tcd-utils - TCD (Tide Constituent Database) Utils In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611271055.kARAtSQF029739@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tcd-utils - TCD (Tide Constituent Database) Utils https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217278 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-11-27 05:55 EST ------- I sent David a patch about setting CPPFLAGS instead of CXXFLAGS for tideEditor, and he also made that a similar change in tcd-utils. This should remove a warning in configure. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 27 11:01:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2006 06:01:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217279] Review Request: tideEditor - Editor for Tide Constituent Database (TCD) files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611271101.kARB11pR030130@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tideEditor - Editor for Tide Constituent Database (TCD) files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217279 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-11-27 06:00 EST ------- Forgot to add that this is a gui app, but I think that it is not wrong not to have a menu entry, since it requires a command line argument. If that changes one day, and something like a filechoser is added to tideEditor, then a desktop file will be needed. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 27 12:05:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2006 07:05:07 -0500 Subject: =?iso-8859-1?q?=5BBug_217351=5D_New=3A_Review_Request=3A_ipw2200?= =?iso-8859-1?q?-firmware_-_Firmware_for_Intel=C2=AE_PRO/Wireless_2?= =?iso-8859-1?q?200_network_adaptors?= Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217351 Summary: Review Request: ipw2200-firmware - Firmware for Intel? PRO/Wireless 2200 network adaptors Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: matthias at rpmforge.net QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://ftp.es6.freshrpms.net/tmp/extras/ SRPM URL: http://ftp.es6.freshrpms.net/pub/freshrpms/fedora/linux/6/ipw2200-firmware/ Description: This package contains the firmware files required by the ipw2200 driver for Linux. Usage of the firmware is subject to the terms and conditions contained in /lib/firmware/LICENSE.ipw2200. Please read it carefully. -- The content of this package seems to meet the "binary firmware" exception of the packaging guidelines, thus should be suitable for inclusion into Extras. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 27 12:05:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2006 07:05:05 -0500 Subject: =?iso-8859-1?q?=5BBug_217350=5D_New=3A_Review_Request=3A_ipw2100?= =?iso-8859-1?q?-firmware_-_Firmware_for_Intel=C2=AE_PRO/Wireless_2?= =?iso-8859-1?q?100_network_adaptors?= Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217350 Summary: Review Request: ipw2100-firmware - Firmware for Intel? PRO/Wireless 2100 network adaptors Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: matthias at rpmforge.net QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://ftp.es6.freshrpms.net/tmp/extras/ SRPM URL: http://ftp.es6.freshrpms.net/pub/freshrpms/fedora/linux/6/ipw2100-firmware/ Description: This package contains the firmware files required by the ipw2100 driver for Linux. Usage of the firmware is subject to the terms and conditions contained in /lib/firmware/LICENSE.ipw2100. Please read it carefully. -- The content of this package seems to meet the "binary firmware" exception of the packaging guidelines, thus should be suitable for inclusion into Extras. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 27 12:24:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2006 07:24:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 198644] new package suggestion: keepass In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611271224.kARCO3pt000938@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: new package suggestion: keepass https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198644 ------- Additional Comments From bugs.michael at gmx.net 2006-11-27 07:24 EST ------- This spec file is inacceptable and a really big mess. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 27 12:31:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2006 07:31:41 -0500 Subject: =?iso-8859-1?q?=5BBug_217350=5D_Review_Request=3A_ipw2100-firmwa?= =?iso-8859-1?q?re_-_Firmware_for_Intel=C2=AE_PRO/Wireless_2100_net?= =?iso-8859-1?q?work_adaptors?= In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611271231.kARCVft8001238@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ipw2100-firmware - Firmware for Intel? PRO/Wireless 2100 network adaptors https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217350 rpm at greysector.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |rpm at greysector.net OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 27 12:32:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2006 07:32:10 -0500 Subject: =?iso-8859-1?q?=5BBug_217351=5D_Review_Request=3A_ipw2200-firmwa?= =?iso-8859-1?q?re_-_Firmware_for_Intel=C2=AE_PRO/Wireless_2200_net?= =?iso-8859-1?q?work_adaptors?= In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611271232.kARCWAJr001296@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ipw2200-firmware - Firmware for Intel? PRO/Wireless 2200 network adaptors https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217351 rpm at greysector.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |rpm at greysector.net OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 27 12:51:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2006 07:51:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217279] Review Request: tideEditor - Editor for Tide Constituent Database (TCD) files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611271251.kARCpZbu002110@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tideEditor - Editor for Tide Constituent Database (TCD) files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217279 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-11-27 07:51 EST ------- Well, * Rebuild for FE-devel succeeded. * SyncNeeded is requested for FE5/6 Now I close this bug as CLOSED NEXTRELEASE. Thank you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 27 13:38:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2006 08:38:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 200722] Review Request: GraphicsMagick In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611271338.kARDcDEL003799@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: GraphicsMagick https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200722 andreas at bawue.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From andreas at bawue.net 2006-11-27 08:38 EST ------- thx for the review, package is in cvs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 27 14:30:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2006 09:30:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217275] Review Request: ocsinventory-client - Open Computer and Software Inventory Next Generation client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611271430.kAREUjbG007402@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocsinventory-client - Open Computer and Software Inventory Next Generation client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217275 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-11-27 09:30 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > > there are some unowned directory issues, > > Yes. I don't have real opinion too. > logrotate and cron are installed on must system. I don't like to add an require > for them as alternatives exists and "virtual-requires" not. In that case you can add a Requires on the directories, or have ocsinventory-client own those directories, until they get owned by the filesystem package. (In reply to comment #5) > I will also change > BuildRequires: dmidecode > Requires: dmidecode > to : > BuildRequires: %{_sbindir}/dmidecode > Requires: %{_sbindir}/dmidecode > > To allow build on older version (RHEL and FC) as dmidecode is provided by > kernel-utils. Fine for me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 27 14:36:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2006 09:36:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217180] Review Request: wbxml2 - WBXML parser and compiler library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611271436.kAREa9C2007712@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wbxml2 - WBXML parser and compiler library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217180 ------- Additional Comments From laurent.rineau__fedora_extras at normalesup.org 2006-11-27 09:36 EST ------- Thank you paragn (I cannot know if Parag is a first name or a family name, sorry). As wbxml2 was orphaned. I have to follow the rules of: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/OrphanedPackages#head-a85a2020dd49e5049bdf20e9bddfede8502e0e32 Well, as far as I can see, I only have to tell fedora-extras-list that I want to take over wbxml2. I have contacted Michael Schwendt (that appears in the former wbxml2 changelog) by e-mail to know if there was issues that lead to orphaning wbxml2. Perhaps I should also include the former changelog in my new spec file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 27 14:54:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2006 09:54:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 211626] Review Request: xtide - Calculate tide all over the world In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611271454.kAREsL4X009099@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xtide - Calculate tide all over the world https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211626 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-11-27 09:54 EST ------- Well, * Rebuild for FE-devel succeeded. * SyncNeeded is requested for FE6 (FE5 branch is already there, so when syncing to FE6 is done, I will rebuild for FE5/6). So I will close this bug as CLOSED NEXTRELEASE. Now libtcd, tcd-utils, xtide and tideEditor are all imported into Fedora Extras. Patrice and Michael, thank you for reviewing and approving xtide related packages with a lot of helpful suggestion. David, thank you for joining this discussion and repackaging and improving upstream tarball. Again, thank you for helping me with xtide related packages!! NOTE: * I asked David about versioning issue. * For libtcd static archive issue, I will try to keep track of the discussion currently proceeding on fedora-devel-list (titled 'Static linking considered harmful') -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 27 14:54:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2006 09:54:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217279] Review Request: tideEditor - Editor for Tide Constituent Database (TCD) files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611271454.kAREsPVw009129@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tideEditor - Editor for Tide Constituent Database (TCD) files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217279 Bug 217279 depends on bug 211626, which changed state. Bug 211626 Summary: Review Request: xtide - Calculate tide all over the world https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211626 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 27 14:59:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2006 09:59:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 203520] Review Request: evolution-brutus In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611271459.kARExSQS009399@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: evolution-brutus Alias: evolution-brutus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203520 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-11-27 09:59 EST ------- ( Just writing a note that this review request is _NOT_ stalled. Jules has been mailing to me what he is concerned about concretely ). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 27 15:32:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2006 10:32:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217366] New: Review Request: libnl - netlink sockets support/manipulation library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217366 Summary: Review Request: libnl - netlink sockets support/manipulation library Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: nhorman at redhat.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/nhorman/rpms/libnl.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/nhorman/rpms/libnl-1.0-pre6.src.rpm Description: libnl is a infrastructure library which makes the use of netlink protocol sockets much more convienient -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 27 16:06:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2006 11:06:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217366] Review Request: libnl - netlink sockets support/manipulation library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611271606.kARG6OPt013788@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libnl - netlink sockets support/manipulation library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217366 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 27 16:15:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2006 11:15:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217366] Review Request: libnl - netlink sockets support/manipulation library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611271615.kARGFj9E014407@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libnl - netlink sockets support/manipulation library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217366 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-11-27 11:15 EST ------- Got rpmlint errors on SRPM package as W: libnl unversioned-explicit-provides %{name}-%{version}-%{release} The specfile contains an unversioned Provides: token, which will match all older, equal, and newer versions of the provided thing. This may cause update problems and will make versioned dependencies, obsoletions and conflicts on the provided thing useless -- make the Provides versioned if possible. E: libnl no-cleaning-of-buildroot %install You should clean $RPM_BUILD_ROOT in the %clean section and just after the beginning of %install section. Use "rm -Rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT". correct those things and submit updated package. 1) You need to add under %install rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT 2) You don't need to specify Provides: %{name}-%{version}-%{release} remove that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 27 16:33:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2006 11:33:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217366] Review Request: libnl - netlink sockets support/manipulation library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611271633.kARGX2jH015659@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libnl - netlink sockets support/manipulation library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217366 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-11-27 11:32 EST ------- Got some more things for you to add in SPEC file You need to go through http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines You followed old method that was used for pre fedora releases. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 27 16:33:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2006 11:33:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214764] Review Request: hunspell - split hunspell out from OpenOffice.org In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611271633.kARGXBEw015670@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hunspell - split hunspell out from OpenOffice.org https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214764 ------- Additional Comments From alexl at redhat.com 2006-11-27 11:32 EST ------- Release: 1 You want some %{?dist} action %package devel Requires: hunspell = %{version}-%{release} I think Requires: %name = %{PACKAGE_VERSION} is better (handles epoch too) Otherwise it looks good to me -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 27 16:37:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2006 11:37:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 174377] Review Request: gnu-smalltalk - GNU Smalltalk In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611271637.kARGb1Rt016063@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnu-smalltalk - GNU Smalltalk https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174377 ------- Additional Comments From Jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2006-11-27 11:36 EST ------- Next Release: SRPM: http://www.herr-schmitt.de/pub/gnu-smalltalk/gnu-smalltalk-2.2c-2.src.rpm SPEC: http://www.herr-schmitt.de/pub/gnu-smalltalk/gnu-smalltalk.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 27 16:41:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2006 11:41:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217366] Review Request: libnl - netlink sockets support/manipulation library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611271641.kARGfHQA016384@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libnl - netlink sockets support/manipulation library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217366 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-11-27 11:41 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=142181) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=142181&action=view) Fixed but not complete SPEC file I fixed some issues in your SPEC file. But still this not complete SPEC file. You need to test this in mock build also. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 27 16:47:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2006 11:47:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217366] Review Request: libnl - netlink sockets support/manipulation library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611271647.kARGlIvx017195@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libnl - netlink sockets support/manipulation library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217366 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-11-27 11:47 EST ------- You don't need to add my name in Changelog. Add your name there. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 27 16:48:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2006 11:48:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216947] Review Request: perl-Gtk2-Notify - Gtk2::Notify Perl module In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611271648.kARGmcae017357@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Gtk2-Notify - Gtk2::Notify Perl module https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216947 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-11-27 11:48 EST ------- Updated with new source url: SRPM URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-Gtk2-Notify-0.02-3.fc6.src.rpm SPEC URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-Gtk2-Notify.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 27 16:49:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2006 11:49:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217366] Review Request: libnl - netlink sockets support/manipulation library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611271649.kARGnIoE017432@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libnl - netlink sockets support/manipulation library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217366 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 27 16:56:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2006 11:56:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216947] Review Request: perl-Gtk2-Notify - Gtk2::Notify Perl module In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611271656.kARGuUgc018241@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Gtk2-Notify - Gtk2::Notify Perl module https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216947 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-11-27 11:56 EST ------- You forget to add version in Changelog entry. rpmlint is complaining for it now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 27 17:02:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2006 12:02:20 -0500 Subject: =?iso-8859-1?q?=5BBug_217351=5D_Review_Request=3A_ipw2200-firmwa?= =?iso-8859-1?q?re_-_Firmware_for_Intel=C2=AE_PRO/Wireless_2200_net?= =?iso-8859-1?q?work_adaptors?= In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611271702.kARH2KMw018639@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ipw2200-firmware - Firmware for Intel? PRO/Wireless 2200 network adaptors https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217351 ------- Additional Comments From notting at redhat.com 2006-11-27 12:02 EST ------- License is not currently acceptable as posted. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 27 17:02:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2006 12:02:30 -0500 Subject: =?iso-8859-1?q?=5BBug_217350=5D_Review_Request=3A_ipw2100-firmwa?= =?iso-8859-1?q?re_-_Firmware_for_Intel=C2=AE_PRO/Wireless_2100_net?= =?iso-8859-1?q?work_adaptors?= In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611271702.kARH2UAW018660@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ipw2100-firmware - Firmware for Intel? PRO/Wireless 2100 network adaptors https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217350 ------- Additional Comments From notting at redhat.com 2006-11-27 12:02 EST ------- License is not currently acceptable as posted. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 27 17:10:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2006 12:10:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216947] Review Request: perl-Gtk2-Notify - Gtk2::Notify Perl module In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611271710.kARHA954018997@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Gtk2-Notify - Gtk2::Notify Perl module https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216947 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-11-27 12:10 EST ------- Fixed. SPEC URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-Gtk2-Notify.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 27 17:20:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2006 12:20:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216947] Review Request: perl-Gtk2-Notify - Gtk2::Notify Perl module In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611271720.kARHKEEJ019515@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Gtk2-Notify - Gtk2::Notify Perl module https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216947 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-11-27 12:20 EST ------- Thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 27 17:34:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2006 12:34:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214764] Review Request: hunspell - split hunspell out from OpenOffice.org In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611271734.kARHYqSl020349@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hunspell - split hunspell out from OpenOffice.org https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214764 caolanm at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |alexl at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From caolanm at redhat.com 2006-11-27 12:34 EST ------- updated spec for above comments total rpmlint output is: "W: hunspell-devel no-documentation" -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 27 18:07:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2006 13:07:37 -0500 Subject: =?iso-8859-1?q?=5BBug_217350=5D_Review_Request=3A_ipw2100-firmwa?= =?iso-8859-1?q?re_-_Firmware_for_Intel=C2=AE_PRO/Wireless_2100_net?= =?iso-8859-1?q?work_adaptors?= In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611271807.kARI7bjK022097@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ipw2100-firmware - Firmware for Intel? PRO/Wireless 2100 network adaptors https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217350 ------- Additional Comments From matthias at rpmforge.net 2006-11-27 13:07 EST ------- Bill, would you be so kind as to explain why? I've read all of the LICENSE file again and again, and don't see anything incompatible with the current "binary firmware" exception, so I must be missing something. Some of the relevant parts : "For OEMs, IHVs, and ISVs: [...] (ii) copy and distribute the Software to your end-users, but only under a license agreement with terms at least as restrictive as those contained in Intel's Final, Single User License Agreement, attached as Exhibit A" "Your rights to redistribute the Software shall be contingent upon your installation of this Agreement in its entirety in the same directory as the Software." (which is why the package puts the LICENSE in the same directory as the firmware itself) I see that sub-licensing is clearly forbidden, is this the problem? I don't think we sub-license, but rather redistribute with the same license, which shouldn't be a problem. But of course, IANAL and probably don't understand all these legal terms properly... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 27 18:29:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2006 13:29:45 -0500 Subject: =?iso-8859-1?q?=5BBug_217350=5D_Review_Request=3A_ipw2100-firmwa?= =?iso-8859-1?q?re_-_Firmware_for_Intel=C2=AE_PRO/Wireless_2100_net?= =?iso-8859-1?q?work_adaptors?= In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611271829.kARITjEj023784@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ipw2100-firmware - Firmware for Intel? PRO/Wireless 2100 network adaptors https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217350 ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2006-11-27 13:29 EST ------- Bill, please also read: http://ipw2100.sourceforge.net/firmware_faq.php . -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 27 18:46:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2006 13:46:02 -0500 Subject: =?iso-8859-1?q?=5BBug_217350=5D_Review_Request=3A_ipw2100-firmwa?= =?iso-8859-1?q?re_-_Firmware_for_Intel=C2=AE_PRO/Wireless_2100_net?= =?iso-8859-1?q?work_adaptors?= In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611271846.kARIk2Lw025031@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ipw2100-firmware - Firmware for Intel? PRO/Wireless 2100 network adaptors https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217350 peter at thecodergeek.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |peter at thecodergeek.com ------- Additional Comments From peter at thecodergeek.com 2006-11-27 13:46 EST ------- My understanding of the FAQ linked by Dominik is that if we package the LICENSE fail as both %doc and in the same directory as the firmware, as well as including an explicit notification of this in the %description, then we are in compliance with Intel's redistribution licensing. IANAL however, and proper legal counsel should be sought to verify whether or not this is enough for Fedora Extras inclusion. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 27 18:47:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2006 13:47:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 201077] gfs-kmod In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611271847.kARIlmem025215@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: gfs-kmod https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201077 katzj at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |katzj at redhat.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From katzj at redhat.com 2006-11-27 13:47 EST ------- Package looks sane and I'll sponsor cfeist. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 27 18:52:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2006 13:52:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216947] Review Request: perl-Gtk2-Notify - Gtk2::Notify Perl module In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611271852.kARIq1sw025589@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Gtk2-Notify - Gtk2::Notify Perl module https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216947 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-11-27 13:52 EST ------- Imported into cvs, branches requested, and building for devel. Thanks for the review! :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 27 19:00:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2006 14:00:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214830] Review Request: Limph - PHP network host monitor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611271900.kARJ0cqi026296@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Limph - PHP network host monitor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214830 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2006-11-27 14:00 EST ------- Thanks, terribly helpful patch. I've applied it, released upstream version 1.9.4 to address the config file, tmp dir and tarball issues, updated spec accordingly, rebuilt, and posted the results: Spec URL: http://gryffindor.jcomserv.net/extras/limph/limph-3.spec SRPM URL: http://gryffindor.jcomserv.net/extras/limph/limph-1.9.4-1.src.rpm (In reply to comment #3) > Created an attachment (id=141960) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=141960&action=view) [edit] > patch to spec file > > Here's a patch that resolves some issues. > > To fix the tar ball issue: > > %setup -q -n %{name} > > Then go back to %setup -q when you fix that. > > Other issues: > - still got some config files in /usr. See my earlier suggestion about maybe > having them include the password information from a common file in /etc/limph. > - tmp dir is still wrong. Do you really need your own tmp dir? Can't be in > /usr in any case. > -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 27 19:05:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2006 14:05:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214830] Review Request: Limph - PHP network host monitor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611271905.kARJ5wVg026582@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Limph - PHP network host monitor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214830 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2006-11-27 14:05 EST ------- Hang on, scratch those, I forgot to migrate one thing to a different file. Give me a few minutes. . . . (In reply to comment #4) > Thanks, terribly helpful patch. I've applied it, released upstream version > 1.9.4 to address the config file, tmp dir and tarball issues, updated spec > accordingly, rebuilt, and posted the results: > > Spec URL: http://gryffindor.jcomserv.net/extras/limph/limph-3.spec > SRPM URL: http://gryffindor.jcomserv.net/extras/limph/limph-1.9.4-1.src.rpm > > (In reply to comment #3) > > Created an attachment (id=141960) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=141960&action=view) [edit] [edit] > > patch to spec file > > > > Here's a patch that resolves some issues. > > > > To fix the tar ball issue: > > > > %setup -q -n %{name} > > > > Then go back to %setup -q when you fix that. > > > > Other issues: > > - still got some config files in /usr. See my earlier suggestion about maybe > > having them include the password information from a common file in /etc/limph. > > - tmp dir is still wrong. Do you really need your own tmp dir? Can't be in > > /usr in any case. > > > > -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 27 19:21:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2006 14:21:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214830] Review Request: Limph - PHP network host monitor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611271921.kARJLpNV028254@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Limph - PHP network host monitor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214830 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2006-11-27 14:21 EST ------- Ok, the above links are again valid. I had to re-do upstream since I forgot to migrate a chunk of host_agent.php to config.php. All better now, but I didn't bump the release number, if I need to, let me know. (In reply to comment #5) > Hang on, scratch those, I forgot to migrate one thing to a different file. Give > me a few minutes. . . . > > (In reply to comment #4) > > Thanks, terribly helpful patch. I've applied it, released upstream version > > 1.9.4 to address the config file, tmp dir and tarball issues, updated spec > > accordingly, rebuilt, and posted the results: > > > > Spec URL: http://gryffindor.jcomserv.net/extras/limph/limph-3.spec > > SRPM URL: http://gryffindor.jcomserv.net/extras/limph/limph-1.9.4-1.src.rpm > > > > (In reply to comment #3) > > > Created an attachment (id=141960) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=141960&action=view) [edit] [edit] [edit] > > > patch to spec file > > > > > > Here's a patch that resolves some issues. > > > > > > To fix the tar ball issue: > > > > > > %setup -q -n %{name} > > > > > > Then go back to %setup -q when you fix that. > > > > > > Other issues: > > > - still got some config files in /usr. See my earlier suggestion about maybe > > > having them include the password information from a common file in /etc/limph. > > > - tmp dir is still wrong. Do you really need your own tmp dir? Can't be in > > > /usr in any case. > > > > > > > > > -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 27 19:30:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2006 14:30:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217311] Review Request: xarchiver - Archive manager for Xfce In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611271930.kARJU4fa028898@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xarchiver - Archive manager for Xfce https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217311 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at christoph-wickert.de 2006-11-27 14:30 EST ------- Thanks for the comments, both fixed in SPEC: http://home.arcor.de/christoph.wickert/fedora/extras/review/SPECS/xarchiver.spec SRPM: http://home.arcor.de/christoph.wickert/fedora/extras/review/SRPMS/xarchiver-0.4.2-0.3.rc2.fc7.src.rpm More thoughts? Have you thought about my suggestion in bug #215241 comment #10? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 27 19:58:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2006 14:58:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213832] Review Request: arpwatch - Network monitoring tools for tracking IP addresses on a network In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611271958.kARJwnSo030723@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: arpwatch - Network monitoring tools for tracking IP addresses on a network https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213832 ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-11-27 14:58 EST ------- Added to dist-fc7. Please close this bug when you've built for rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 27 19:59:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2006 14:59:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213868] Review Request: libpcap - A system-independent interface for user-level packet capture In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611271959.kARJxK8d030783@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libpcap - A system-independent interface for user-level packet capture https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213868 jkeating at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jkeating at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-11-27 14:58 EST ------- Added to dist-fc7. Please close this bug when you've built for rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 27 20:24:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2006 15:24:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217366] Review Request: libnl - netlink sockets support/manipulation library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611272024.kARKOwBs000501@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libnl - netlink sockets support/manipulation library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217366 ------- Additional Comments From nhorman at redhat.com 2006-11-27 15:24 EST ------- New sepc and srpm available, with changes incorporated: SPEC File: http://people.redhat.com/nhorman/rpms/libnl.spec SRPM: http://people.redhat.com/nhorman/rpms/libnl-1.0-0.1.pre6.src.rpm Built in mock with no errors -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 27 21:11:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2006 16:11:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216734] Review Request: gnome-compiz-manager - compiz configuration utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611272111.kARLBGZM004368@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-compiz-manager - compiz configuration utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216734 ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2006-11-27 16:11 EST ------- I cannot reproduce that. I've built and run sucessfully on FC6 i386 and x86_64. Did you build against devel, by chance? Notice that there is still some "No symbol table info available." lines in the report. If you could install libgnomeui-debuginfo and glib2-debuginfo perhaps we will see more of the trace. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 27 21:59:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2006 16:59:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 208113] Review Request: freepops - a tool to get html mail through a pop daemon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611272159.kARLxchV008678@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: freepops - a tool to get html mail through a pop daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208113 ------- Additional Comments From thibaud.mouton at gmail.com 2006-11-27 16:59 EST ------- Spec URL: http://perso.orange.fr/gollum-on-the-web/freepops.spec SRPM URL: http://perso.orange.fr/gollum-on-the-web/freepops-0.0.99-3.src.rpm Sorry for being so long but I didn't have internet access. So, I take care about your comments and tried to fix them. But: - I dismiss debuginfo package because it is not really necessary - I still have problems with update, a personnal script which allow to update plugins conveniently from an archive that I provide in the source package. Rpmlint considers it as a simple file so it warns about strange permissions. How could I do if I cannot use this kind of process? I will now faster to answer Thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 27 22:29:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2006 17:29:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217259] Review Request: alsa-firmware - Firmware for several ALSA-supported sound card In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611272229.kARMTnEk012178@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: alsa-firmware - Firmware for several ALSA-supported sound card https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217259 ------- Additional Comments From rpm at timj.co.uk 2006-11-27 17:29 EST ------- Incidentally, given that few people will need more than one set of firmware installed, there is a valid argument for splitting the firmware into subpackages (e.g. alsa-firmware-echoaudio). Any arguments pro- or con- are welcome. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 27 22:31:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2006 17:31:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217256] Review Request: alsa-tools - Specialist tools for ALSA In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611272231.kARMVvFV012467@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: alsa-tools - Specialist tools for ALSA https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217256 ------- Additional Comments From rpm at timj.co.uk 2006-11-27 17:31 EST ------- Many thanks for the review Parag. I left the version at 1.0.12 to match the version of alsa-libs currently included with FC6. Linus, I'm not 100% sure whether including your script is appropriate or not. In one way, I think it should be in a separate package (e.g. alsa-opl3 or something) but that seems complete overkill for a 4 line script. On the other hand it is kind of appropriate to put it here given that alsa-tools includes the sbiload binary. If we did include it I'm not sure what I would call the init script. "alsa-tools" seems wrong. "alsa-tools-opl3" is OK, but a bit of chkconfig clutter. Parag, do you have any comments? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 27 22:41:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2006 17:41:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217259] Review Request: alsa-firmware - Firmware for several ALSA-supported sound card In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611272241.kARMfSoY013399@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: alsa-firmware - Firmware for several ALSA-supported sound card https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217259 ------- Additional Comments From nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net 2006-11-27 17:41 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=142239) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=142239&action=view) Another spec variant The spec variant I use on my box, in case it helps -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 27 22:46:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2006 17:46:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216544] Review Request: libdvdread - Simple foundation for reading DVD video disks In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611272246.kARMk2q4013839@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libdvdread - Simple foundation for reading DVD video disks https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216544 ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2006-11-27 17:46 EST ------- To resolve any doubts: https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-maintainers/2006-November/msg00256.html Imported and built for devel, FC-5 and FC-6 branches requested. Thanks for the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 27 22:46:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2006 17:46:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216544] Review Request: libdvdread - Simple foundation for reading DVD video disks In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611272246.kARMklv4013906@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libdvdread - Simple foundation for reading DVD video disks https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216544 rpm at greysector.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 27 22:47:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2006 17:47:09 -0500 Subject: =?iso-8859-1?q?=5BBug_217350=5D_Review_Request=3A_ipw2100-firmwa?= =?iso-8859-1?q?re_-_Firmware_for_Intel=C2=AE_PRO/Wireless_2100_net?= =?iso-8859-1?q?work_adaptors?= In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611272247.kARMl94o013963@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ipw2100-firmware - Firmware for Intel? PRO/Wireless 2100 network adaptors https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217350 ------- Additional Comments From giallu at gmail.com 2006-11-27 17:46 EST ------- IANAL as well, but given the point A1.2 in the FAQ the package seems acceptable, _BUT_ with an improved description. As it stands now, it does not seems to comply with: "any description within the package must indicate that the package is covered by the Intel license, and provide the user with information on how to access that license -- making it clear that the user is not granted a license to use the package unless these terms are agreed to." -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 27 22:54:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2006 17:54:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217256] Review Request: alsa-tools - Specialist tools for ALSA In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611272254.kARMsP28014546@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: alsa-tools - Specialist tools for ALSA https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217256 ------- Additional Comments From triad at df.lth.se 2006-11-27 17:54 EST ------- Tim, don't care about that script right now. Import and build instead, I'll make a patch in some separate bug instead if I find the time. Good work! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 27 22:55:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2006 17:55:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 206871] Review Request: ekg2 - Multi-protocol instant messaging and chat client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611272255.kARMtX00014642@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ekg2 - Multi-protocol instant messaging and chat client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206871 mr.ecik at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mr.ecik at gmail.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mr.ecik at gmail.com 2006-11-27 17:55 EST ------- The main package looks good, but you have to fix some issues in subpackages. -xosd, -logsqlite, -jabber and -gadu-gadu subpackage contain documentation files in %{_datadir}/ekg2/[sub_package_name]. Firstly, you should either simply mark them as %doc in ekg2 datadir or don't even install them there, just put it in standard documentation folder. Secondly, Polish doc files in subpackages have wrong charset - iconv them to utf8. And the thing I've already mentioned at IRC channel is to change "pluginami" to "wtyczkami" in description of main package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 27 23:06:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2006 18:06:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216534] Review Request: gocr - GNU Optical Character Recognition program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611272306.kARN63JJ015495@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gocr - GNU Optical Character Recognition program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216534 greg at runlevel7.ca changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |greg at runlevel7.ca ------- Additional Comments From greg at runlevel7.ca 2006-11-27 18:05 EST ------- Is this here just for FuzzyOcr? If so, the developers recommend gocr-0.40 now according to: http://fuzzyocr.own-hero.net/wiki/Installation-3.x "preferably version 0.40 (some people reported bad recognition with 0.41)" -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 27 23:07:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2006 18:07:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 206871] Review Request: ekg2 - Multi-protocol instant messaging and chat client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611272307.kARN7nUi015668@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ekg2 - Multi-protocol instant messaging and chat client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206871 ------- Additional Comments From mr.ecik at gmail.com 2006-11-27 18:07 EST ------- 1. I found another issue now. When trying to install it I get following error: Preparing... ########################################### [100%] file /usr/libexec/ioctld from install of ekg2-0-0.2.20061119 conflicts with file from package ekg-1.7-0.3.rc2.fc6 ekg and ekg2 come to conflict with each other. 2. How about metapackages? Typying only `yum install ekg2` a normal user won't get a usable ekg2 package. Trying to connect to any protocol just ends with an ugly "Nieprawid?owy identyfikator u?ytkownika" (Incorrect user id) - he may get discouraged by it. Maybe move a ekg2 content to ekg2-core and make main package as a metapackage which installs ekg2-core and ekg2-gadu-gadu (or even ekg2-jabber) would be a good solution? What's your opinion? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 27 23:12:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2006 18:12:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 206871] Review Request: ekg2 - Multi-protocol instant messaging and chat client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611272312.kARNC8Vw016155@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ekg2 - Multi-protocol instant messaging and chat client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206871 ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2006-11-27 18:12 EST ------- I agree. The same should probably be done with gg2. I'll fix the above issues shortly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 27 23:23:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2006 18:23:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216536] Review Request: FuzzyOcr - Checks for specific keywords in image attachments, using gocr In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611272323.kARNNuGv017552@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: FuzzyOcr - Checks for specific keywords in image attachments, using gocr https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216536 ------- Additional Comments From greg at runlevel7.ca 2006-11-27 18:23 EST ------- FYI, SME Server (RHEL4/CentOS4 compatible distro) is currently testing and packaging FuzzyOcr - cvs is here: http://smeserver.cvs.sourceforge.net/smeserver/FuzzyOcr/ http://smeserver.cvs.sourceforge.net/*checkout*/smeserver/FuzzyOcr/F/FuzzyOcr.sp ec I'm sure our spec file is not up to Fedora extras standards, but just letting you know it's there - for comparison to your version. I googled and other distro's seem to use naming like: perl-Mail-SpamAssassin-Plugin-PluginName ...but that seems too long. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 27 23:43:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2006 18:43:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216536] Review Request: FuzzyOcr - Checks for specific keywords in image attachments, using gocr In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611272343.kARNhNus019547@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: FuzzyOcr - Checks for specific keywords in image attachments, using gocr https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216536 ------- Additional Comments From greg at runlevel7.ca 2006-11-27 18:43 EST ------- Also requires perl-MLDBM and gifsicle according to: http://fuzzyocr.own-hero.net/wiki/Installation-3.x Rpmforge packages perl-MLDBM: http://svn.rpmforge.net/svn/trunk/rpms/perl-MLDBM/perl-MLDBM.spec SME Server packages gifsicle: http://smeserver.cvs.sourceforge.net/smeserver/gifsicle/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 28 01:27:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2006 20:27:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213798] Review Request: python-alsaaudio - Python Alsa Bindings In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611280127.kAS1Rdif022989@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-alsaaudio - Python Alsa Bindings https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213798 bdpepple at ameritech.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at ameritech.net 2006-11-27 20:27 EST ------- Built for FC6 & devel. Thanks for the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 28 01:28:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2006 20:28:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 199029] Review Request: jokosher In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611280128.kAS1SCH3023020@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jokosher https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199029 Bug 199029 depends on bug 213798, which changed state. Bug 213798 Summary: Review Request: python-alsaaudio - Python Alsa Bindings https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213798 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 28 01:59:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2006 20:59:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216734] Review Request: gnome-compiz-manager - compiz configuration utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611280159.kAS1xFfC024102@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-compiz-manager - compiz configuration utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216734 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-11-27 20:59 EST ------- So did i also built for FC6. Anyway will install libgnomeui-debuginfo and glib2-debuginfo and check. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 28 02:00:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2006 21:00:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217256] Review Request: alsa-tools - Specialist tools for ALSA In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611280200.kAS20EF0024296@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: alsa-tools - Specialist tools for ALSA https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217256 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-11-27 21:00 EST ------- Linus, I think its better to have another package that contains your script. you can start packaging that script and create alsa-tools-opl3 review request. I will be happy to review that also :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 28 02:40:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2006 21:40:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 195485] Review Request: kdegraphics: K Desktop Environment - Graphics Applications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611280240.kAS2eq2V028934@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdegraphics: K Desktop Environment - Graphics Applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195485 jpmahowald at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |jpmahowald at gmail.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2006-11-27 21:40 EST ------- kdegraphics Building on FC6 x86_64. All applications ran a simple test successfully. (In reply to comment #0) > %changelog > * Mon Jun 12 2006 Rex Dieter 7:3.5.3-2 ... > - fc5+: BR: poppler-devel libXxf86vm-devel OK, but configure log says: You're missing poppler. The additional info plugin for PDF files files won't be compiled without poppler >= 0.3.1. You can download poppler from http://poppler.freedesktop.org/ Lots of rpmlint (some of these repeat for every program): E: kdegraphics postin-without-ldconfig /usr/lib64/libtext2path.so.0.0.0 Add an ldconfig script. W: kdegraphics dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/kruler/common .. /common Ignore, common is in parent E: kdegraphics file-in-usr-marked-as-conffile /usr/share/config.kcfg/kdvi.kcfg Ignore, KDE puts them there. Lots of: warning: file contains key "Keywords", this key is currently reserved f or use within KDE, and should in the future KDE releases be prefixed by "X-" and error: invalid characters in value of key "Keywords[sr]", keys of type string may contain ASCII characters except control characters Ignoring as per the comment in the spec. + License GPL + Uses macros throughout + Source matches + Sane BuildRoot + devel subpackage + Proper %clean + Use of %doc macro + Sets %defattr + Uses %find_lang -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 28 03:30:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2006 22:30:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 210776] Review Request: monotools - access to monodoc without using monodevelop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611280330.kAS3U629007513@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: monotools - access to monodoc without using monodevelop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210776 ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2006-11-27 22:29 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > SRPM URL: http://nodoid.homelinux.org/fedora/monotools-1.1.17-1.src.rpm 404'd, what's the latest SRPM URL? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 28 04:01:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2006 23:01:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 191218] Review Request: PyScript - Postscript graphics with Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611280401.kAS41d4V011159@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PyScript - Postscript graphics with Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191218 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-11-27 23:01 EST ------- Hey Paul. You might try posting to the fedora-extras list (see: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list ) and seeing if you can find anyone who's interested in maintaining this package... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 28 04:20:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2006 23:20:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 199679] Review Request: pgpool - Connection pooling/replication server for PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611280420.kAS4KecI013131@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pgpool - Connection pooling/replication server for PostgreSQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199679 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-11-27 23:20 EST ------- 1 thru 4: ok. On item 5: The %configure macro already passes those variables (along with many others): %configure \ CFLAGS="${CFLAGS:-%optflags}" ; export CFLAGS ; \ CXXFLAGS="${CXXFLAGS:-%optflags}" ; export CXXFLAGS ; \ FFLAGS="${FFLAGS:-%optflags}" ; export FFLAGS ; \ ./configure --host=%{_host} --build=%{_build} \\\ --target=%{_target_platform} \\\ --program-prefix=%{?_program_prefix} \\\ --prefix=%{_prefix} \\\ --exec-prefix=%{_exec_prefix} \\\ --bindir=%{_bindir} \\\ --sbindir=%{_sbindir} \\\ --sysconfdir=%{_sysconfdir} \\\ --datadir=%{_datadir} \\\ --includedir=%{_includedir} \\\ --libdir=%{_libdir} \\\ --libexecdir=%{_libexecdir} \\\ --localstatedir=%{_localstatedir} \\\ --sharedstatedir=%{_sharedstatedir} \\\ --mandir=%{_mandir} \\\ --infodir=%{_infodir} If you were calling ./configure you would have to pass those, but using the %configure macro I don't see how it's needed. Perhaps I'm missing something? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 28 05:41:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2006 00:41:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217484] New: Review Request: rlwrap - Wrapper for GNU readline Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217484 Summary: Review Request: rlwrap - Wrapper for GNU readline Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: michel.salim at gmail.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://hircus.org/fedora/rlwrap/rlwrap.spec SRPM URL: http://hircus.org/fedora/rlwrap/rlwrap-0.28-1.src.rpm Description: rlwrap is a 'readline wrapper' that uses the GNU readline library to allow the editing of keyboard input for any other command. Input history is remembered across invocations, separately for each command; history completion and search work as in bash and completion word lists can be specified on the command line. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 28 05:41:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2006 00:41:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 199679] Review Request: pgpool - Connection pooling/replication server for PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611280541.kAS5frEu020182@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pgpool - Connection pooling/replication server for PostgreSQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199679 ------- Additional Comments From devrim at commandprompt.com 2006-11-28 00:41 EST ------- Hello, As I wrote before, it is a problem with pgpool configure script. You can try by cleaning up configure line in the spec file. You will get this error: Checking for unpackaged file(s): /usr/lib/rpm/check-files /var/tmp/postgresql-pgpool-3.1.1-6-root-root error: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found: /etc/pgpool.conf.sample RPM build errors: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found: /etc/pgpool.conf.sample Anyway, I'll truncate the other parts. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 28 05:44:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2006 00:44:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 199679] Review Request: pgpool - Connection pooling/replication server for PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611280544.kAS5ikjT020281@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pgpool - Connection pooling/replication server for PostgreSQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199679 ------- Additional Comments From devrim at commandprompt.com 2006-11-28 00:44 EST ------- New spec: http://developer.postgresql.org/~devrim/rpms/other/pgpool/postgresql-pgpool.spec New SRPM: http://developer.postgresql.org/~devrim/rpms/other/pgpool/postgresql-pgpool-3.1.1-6.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 28 05:54:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2006 00:54:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217484] Review Request: rlwrap - Wrapper for GNU readline In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611280554.kAS5sWnS020680@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rlwrap - Wrapper for GNU readline https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217484 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 28 06:01:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2006 01:01:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 199679] Review Request: pgpool - Connection pooling/replication server for PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611280601.kAS61U1R020995@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pgpool - Connection pooling/replication server for PostgreSQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199679 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-11-28 01:01 EST ------- ok, I see what you are trying to do. Thats not going to work however. Setting '--sysconfdir=%{_docdir}/%{name}-%{version}' will cause the package not to function correctly. It's going to be looking for the config file in that location...ie, to configure the package a user will have to create a /usr/share/doc/postgresql-pgpool-3.1.1-6/pgpool.conf file. Thats not the desired result. Possible solutions: - Change configure back to just %configure, then at the end of your %install section 'rm -f %{buildroot}/%{_sysconfdir}/pgpool.conf.sample' - Change configure back to just %configure, then at the end of your %install section 'mv %{buildroot}/%{_sysconfdir}/pgpool.conf.sample %{buildroot}/%{_sysconfdir}/pgpool.conf' What does pgpool do when you don't have a pgpool.conf file? If it gives a coherent error message, then option 1 should be fine, if it doesn't then perhaps option 2 would be better to provide more info for the user. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 28 06:12:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2006 01:12:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217484] Review Request: rlwrap - Wrapper for GNU readline In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611280612.kAS6C82x021395@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rlwrap - Wrapper for GNU readline https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217484 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-11-28 01:11 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and RPMS. + source files match upstream. 057871cb04d9dec237ac565aff5a93d7 rlwrap-0.28.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. License text included in package. + %doc is small; no -doc subpackage required. + %doc does not affect runtime. + COPYING included in %doc. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel or any subpackages exists + no .la files. + no translations are available + Dose owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 28 06:12:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2006 01:12:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 174377] Review Request: gnu-smalltalk - GNU Smalltalk In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611280612.kAS6CHg8021415@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnu-smalltalk - GNU Smalltalk https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174377 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 28 06:13:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2006 01:13:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 174377] Review Request: gnu-smalltalk - GNU Smalltalk In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611280613.kAS6DCq4021503@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnu-smalltalk - GNU Smalltalk https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174377 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 28 06:25:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2006 01:25:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213594] Review Request: eclipse-phpeclipse In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611280625.kAS6Ppav022005@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-phpeclipse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213594 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at theholbrooks.org 2006-11-28 01:25 EST ------- Spec URL: http://theholbrooks.org/RPMS/eclipse-phpeclipse.spec SRPM URL: http://theholbrooks.org/RPMS/eclipse-phpeclipse-1.1.8-10.src.rpm Okay I spent a couple days tweaking the java command and now have something that builds again. Ben, I tried using `eclipse` to do my build, but every time it died with a 'Could not open Display' error. With or without '-noSplash', I couldn't get it to work. Is there another trick to get eclipse to run command-line-only? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 28 06:47:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2006 01:47:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213594] Review Request: eclipse-phpeclipse In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611280647.kAS6ldFw023068@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-phpeclipse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213594 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at theholbrooks.org 2006-11-28 01:47 EST ------- Spec URL: http://theholbrooks.org/RPMS/eclipse-phpeclipse.spec SRPM URL: http://theholbrooks.org/RPMS/eclipse-phpeclipse-1.1.8-11.src.rpm I bumped the eclipse-platform requirement to 3.2 to reflect the current eclipse version in fc6/devel -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 28 07:22:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2006 02:22:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 174377] Review Request: gnu-smalltalk - GNU Smalltalk In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611280722.kAS7M2dp024524@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnu-smalltalk - GNU Smalltalk https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174377 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-11-28 02:22 EST ------- Okay, I will review this package. 0. spec file description : * %prep - applying patches I usually recommend to add some suffix every time you apply a patch, e.g. %patch1 -p1 -b .am * %build section - export CFLAGS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS" This is not necessary because %configure macro sets this. - make %{?_smp_mflags} LIBTOOL="/usr/bin/libtool" Use macro. i.e. LIBTOOL="%{_bindir}/libtool" * %install section - Fix broken Shebangs (Please see "timestamp" section below for this). * %files section - COPYING Why does every subpackage have same COPYING file? Only for rpmlint issue? If so, please remove these as this rpmlint can be ignored. - *.st files Well, actually I first saw this utility so I don't quite know how to use this package, however, are these *.st really required for 'minimal' use of smalltalk? Or are these somewhat 'add-on' files for smalltalk? (The judgment as of what is 'minimal' use is up to you.) - /usr/share/gnu-smalltalk/unsupported/binary.c rpmlint complains about this file as 'devel-file-in-non-devel-package'. Would you explain why this file should be in main package? Then: 1. From http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines : * Timestamps This package contains lots of text files (mainly *.st files), so keeping timestamps is highly preferable because - it shows when the file is written by upstream or vendor (as you) - it may suggest whether vendor (you) have changed original content. So please keep timestamps for text files included. Then: A. Try: 'make DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT INSTALL="install -c -p" install' B. For "Fix broken Shebangs" section: B-1 check if this section is still needed. B-2 If so (i.e. this section is still needed), change the description of this section so that the files which are actually not needed to be fixed _WON'T_ change their timestamps. * File and Directory Ownership - %{_datadir}/aclocal/ This directory is owned only by automake and so -devel package should require automake. 2. From http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines : (okay) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 28 07:30:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2006 02:30:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 174377] Review Request: gnu-smalltalk - GNU Smalltalk In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611280730.kAS7UEiD024798@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnu-smalltalk - GNU Smalltalk https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174377 ------- Additional Comments From bonzini at gnu.org 2006-11-28 02:30 EST ------- I can reply as far as the upstream package is concerned... > * %install section > - Fix broken Shebangs > (Please see "timestamp" section below for this). Should not be necessary anymore. > - *.st files > Well, actually I first saw this utility so I don't quite know > how to use this package, however, are these *.st really required > for 'minimal' use of smalltalk? Or are these somewhat 'add-on' > files for smalltalk? (The judgment as of what is 'minimal' use > is up to you.) They are needed to load the optional packages (e.g. sockets, GUI bindings, ...). > - /usr/share/gnu-smalltalk/unsupported/binary.c > rpmlint complains about this file as 'devel-file-in-non-devel-package'. > Would you explain why this file should be in main package? I'm going to remove this from the upstream package too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 28 08:30:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2006 03:30:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216734] Review Request: gnome-compiz-manager - compiz configuration utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611280830.kAS8U8ZM027053@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-compiz-manager - compiz configuration utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216734 ------- Additional Comments From giallu at gmail.com 2006-11-28 03:30 EST ------- 0.9.13.1 is out. Any chances of an update? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 28 08:45:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2006 03:45:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217497] New: Review Request: dbmail - The DBMail mail storage system Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217497 Summary: Review Request: dbmail - The DBMail mail storage system Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: bjohnson at symetrix.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.symetrix.com/~bjohnson/projects/Fedora-Extras/dbmail.spec SRPM URL: http://www.symetrix.com/~bjohnson/projects/Fedora-Extras/dbmail-2.2.1-2.fc6.src.rpm Description: Dbmail is the name of a group of programs that enable the possiblilty of storing and retrieving mail messages from a database. Currently MySQL and PostgreSQL can be used as database backends. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 28 08:58:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2006 03:58:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217497] Review Request: dbmail - The DBMail mail storage system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611280858.kAS8wlnv030081@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dbmail - The DBMail mail storage system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217497 bjohnson at symetrix.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: dbmail - The|Review Request: dbmail - The |DBMail mail storage system |DBMail mail storage system BugsThisDependsOn| |216723 OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 28 08:58:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2006 03:58:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216723] Review Request: libsieve - A library for parsing, sorting and filtering your mail In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611280858.kAS8wwF8030103@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libsieve - A library for parsing, sorting and filtering your mail https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216723 bjohnson at symetrix.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |217497 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 28 10:15:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2006 05:15:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214764] Review Request: hunspell - split hunspell out from OpenOffice.org In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611281015.kASAFo28005930@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hunspell - split hunspell out from OpenOffice.org https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214764 ------- Additional Comments From alexl at redhat.com 2006-11-28 05:15 EST ------- Looks ok to me then. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 28 10:34:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2006 05:34:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 210007] Review Request: - In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611281034.kASAYBa9007362@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210007 ------- Additional Comments From Nadia.Derbey at bull.net 2006-11-28 05:34 EST ------- Konrad, I have changed my spec file to make it build the rpm against the kernel / distro installed on the machine building the RPM. *but* I have 1 question: I need the kernel tunables database rpm to be rebuilt for each kernel "supported" with FC6. I need it to be something ala kernel-devel pacakge: for FC5, kernel-devel packages are available starting from 2.6.15, up to 2.6.18 kernel releases. I guess for FC6 there will be some kernel-devel packages delivered for 2.6.19, etc. This is exactly the same thing I need for my rpm. What should I do in my spec file (or may be elsewhere?) to specify that? Hope my question is clear enough ;-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 28 11:49:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2006 06:49:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 208113] Review Request: freepops - a tool to get html mail through a pop daemon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611281149.kASBnBHq012668@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: freepops - a tool to get html mail through a pop daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208113 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-11-28 06:48 EST ------- (In reply to comment #6) > Spec URL: http://perso.orange.fr/gollum-on-the-web/freepops.spec > SRPM URL: http://perso.orange.fr/gollum-on-the-web/freepops-0.0.99-3.src.rpm > > Sorry for being so long but I didn't have internet access. > > So, I take care about your comments and tried to fix them. > But: > - I dismiss debuginfo package because it is not really necessary Why do you say that? Is this software completely bug-free, has it always been so, and will it always be so in the future? > - I still have problems with update, a personnal script which allow to update > plugins conveniently from an archive that I provide in the source package. > Rpmlint considers it as a simple file so it warns about strange permissions. > How could I do if I cannot use this kind of process? It would be better just to dispense with the script and reproduce its contents directly into the spot in %prep where you are calling it, since all it is doing is unpacking and placing updates into position. However, as noted in Comment #4, the unpacking should not happen in the SOURCES directory (it may clobber some other files there); you should use a temporary directory within the unpacked source area (i.e. in the build directory) for this purpose. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 28 12:36:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2006 07:36:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213868] Review Request: libpcap - A system-independent interface for user-level packet capture In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611281236.kASCaI0X014877@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libpcap - A system-independent interface for user-level packet capture https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213868 mlichvar at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 28 12:39:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2006 07:39:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214764] Review Request: hunspell - split hunspell out from OpenOffice.org In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611281239.kASCdP1x015099@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hunspell - split hunspell out from OpenOffice.org https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214764 alexl at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |alexl at redhat.com OtherBugsDependingO|188265 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 28 12:40:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2006 07:40:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214764] Review Request: hunspell - split hunspell out from OpenOffice.org In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611281240.kASCeaWO015225@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hunspell - split hunspell out from OpenOffice.org https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214764 alexl at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 28 13:20:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2006 08:20:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 197867] Review Request: iscsitarget (includes kernel module) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611281320.kASDKCkU017373@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: iscsitarget (includes kernel module) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197867 dennis at ausil.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(i.pilcher at comcast. | |net) ------- Additional Comments From dennis at ausil.us 2006-11-28 08:20 EST ------- Ian will you be submitting packages? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 28 13:21:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2006 08:21:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213832] Review Request: arpwatch - Network monitoring tools for tracking IP addresses on a network In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611281321.kASDLwph017487@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: arpwatch - Network monitoring tools for tracking IP addresses on a network https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213832 mlichvar at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 28 13:26:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2006 08:26:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215241] Review Request: thunar-archive-plugin - Archive plugin for the Thunar file manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611281326.kASDQs2C017794@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: thunar-archive-plugin - Archive plugin for the Thunar file manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215241 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-11-28 08:26 EST ------- I would have personally kept the dir ownership in both packages, but you can remove it from thunar-archive-plugin if you want. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 28 13:28:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2006 08:28:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217524] New: Review Request: libsyncml - SyncML protocol library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217524 Summary: Review Request: libsyncml - SyncML protocol library Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: laurent.rineau__fedora_extras at normalesup.org QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www-sop.inria.fr/geometrica/team/Laurent.Rineau/Fedora/libsyncml.spec SRPM URL: http://www-sop.inria.fr/geometrica/team/Laurent.Rineau/Fedora/libsyncml-0.4.2-1.src.rpm Description: Libsyncml is a implementation of the SyncML protocol. Quote from Wikipedia: "SyncML is most commonly thought of as a method to synchronize contact and calendar information between some type of handheld device and a computer (personal, or network-based service), such as between a mobile phone and a personal computer." Note?1: This library requires wbxml2, which has been unorphaned. See bug #217180. Note?2: I have not yet managed to build it with mock, because wbxml2 has not been pushed into rawhide. It was build successfully today. See http://buildsys.fedoraproject.org/build-status/job.psp?uid=22503 Note?3: libopensync-plugin-syncml will follow, blocked by bug #217150. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 28 13:35:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2006 08:35:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 208113] Review Request: freepops - a tool to get html mail through a pop daemon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611281335.kASDZWTo018446@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: freepops - a tool to get html mail through a pop daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208113 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-11-28 08:35 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=142284) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=142284&action=view) freepops spec with proposed fixes applied Well, there are still not a few issues to be fixed, including debuginfo rpm issue and the issue of expanding source in unwilling directory. I attached a spec file which will hopely fix all issues I have mentioned. Please check what I have changed (because it is not me who want to maintain this package.....) and please feel free to ask me if you have some questions. Then: * as I have said in comment #4, please specify the URLs of sources so that the viewer of this spec file (including me) can verify if the sources are correct. I will re-check your spec file when you update it again. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 28 13:39:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2006 08:39:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 208113] Review Request: freepops - a tool to get html mail through a pop daemon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611281339.kASDd4Ab018721@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: freepops - a tool to get html mail through a pop daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208113 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-11-28 08:38 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=142285) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=142285&action=view) Patch to remove windows-like encodings. Patch2 in my spec file (freepops-0.0.99-3.1) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 28 13:51:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2006 08:51:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217180] Review Request: wbxml2 - WBXML parser and compiler library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611281351.kASDpZj8019796@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wbxml2 - WBXML parser and compiler library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217180 laurent.rineau__fedora_extras at normalesup.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From laurent.rineau__fedora_extras at normalesup.org 2006-11-28 08:51 EST ------- Build for rawhide. Build job 22503. I have just submitted a new request, for libsyncml this time. See bug #217524. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 28 13:51:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2006 08:51:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214312] Review Request: xdms - Extracts Amiga DMS archives In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611281351.kASDpkY7019844@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xdms - Extracts Amiga DMS archives Alias: xdms https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214312 packages at amiga-hardware.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From packages at amiga-hardware.com 2006-11-28 08:51 EST ------- Changes applied. Imported and built. Thanks for the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 28 14:22:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2006 09:22:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217524] Review Request: libsyncml - SyncML protocol library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611281422.kASEMaWZ023220@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libsyncml - SyncML protocol library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217524 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 28 16:24:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2006 11:24:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 208113] Review Request: freepops - a tool to get html mail through a pop daemon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611281624.kASGO2td004003@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: freepops - a tool to get html mail through a pop daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208113 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-11-28 11:23 EST ------- Oops... Please change 'install -m???' to 'install -p -m???' to keep timestamps. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 28 16:28:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2006 11:28:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217311] Review Request: xarchiver - Archive manager for Xfce In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611281628.kASGSNuU004462@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xarchiver - Archive manager for Xfce https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217311 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-11-28 11:28 EST ------- Unused dependency on sonames. I haven't investigated where they come from, most probable is .pc file not using correctly *.private (libm and libdl are certainly not problematic): /usr/lib/libatk-1.0.so.0 /lib/libm.so.6 /usr/lib/libpangocairo-1.0.so.0 /usr/lib/libpango-1.0.so.0 /usr/lib/libcairo.so.2 /lib/libgmodule-2.0.so.0 /lib/libdl.so.2 There is a requires for binutils, for ar, for .deb. Also reading src/deb.c, it seems to me that the files in /tmp are not safely created, opening the possibility of a symlink in tmp attack. Maybe the manipulation should be done in a /tmp subdir. I haven't checked the other /tmp use, some look clearly right, for others there is a need to look at the code. in src/callback.c, in xa_activate_link, I think it would be relevant to add a search from htmlview, and add a Requires for htmlview. Otherwise a Requires firefox could be used, but I think it would be much better to call htmlview. There is also a missing requires of cpio for rpm. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 28 16:41:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2006 11:41:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 208113] Review Request: freepops - a tool to get html mail through a pop daemon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611281641.kASGfHKP005536@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: freepops - a tool to get html mail through a pop daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208113 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #142284|0 |1 is obsolete| | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-11-28 11:41 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=142304) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=142304&action=view) freepops spec with proposed fixes (more) applied Umm.. by checking build log, WHERE=%{_prefix} was found to be incorrect, which should be WHERE=%{_prefix}/ . -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 28 16:54:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2006 11:54:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214764] Review Request: hunspell - split hunspell out from OpenOffice.org In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611281654.kASGslkr006387@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hunspell - split hunspell out from OpenOffice.org https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214764 jkeating at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jkeating at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-11-28 11:54 EST ------- Any reason why you're packaging the .a file? We don't normally do that unless absolutely necessary. I'll add the package, but please fix that. Please close this bug when you've built for rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 28 16:56:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2006 11:56:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 210007] Review Request: - In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611281656.kASGuGxZ006568@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210007 konradr at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |davej at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From konradr at redhat.com 2006-11-28 11:56 EST ------- Nadia, Your question is clear enough, the answer is hard :-) Dave Jones, do you have an idea of how to do this? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 28 16:56:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2006 11:56:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217557] New: Review Request: keurocalc - KEuroCalc is a universal currency converter and calculator Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217557 Summary: Review Request: keurocalc - KEuroCalc is a universal currency converter and calculator Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cgoorah at yahoo.com.au QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://chitlesh.funpic.de/fedora/SPECS/keurocalc.spec SRPM URL: http://chitlesh.funpic.de/fedora/SRPM/keurocalc-0.9.7-1.src.rpm Description: KEuroCalc is a universal currency converter and calculator. It can convert from and to many currencies, either with a fixed conversion rate or a variable conversion rate. It directly downloads the latest variable rates through the Internet -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 28 17:10:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2006 12:10:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217557] Review Request: keurocalc - KEuroCalc is a universal currency converter and calculator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611281710.kASHAkKx007886@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: keurocalc - KEuroCalc is a universal currency converter and calculator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217557 ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2006-11-28 12:10 EST ------- Please check the URL you have provided. On both of them I get: Keine Berechtigung. Richte auch du Deine kostenlose Homepage beim kostenlosen Webspace bei Funpic.de ein. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 28 17:15:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2006 12:15:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217366] Review Request: libnl - netlink sockets support/manipulation library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611281715.kASHFO2X008203@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libnl - netlink sockets support/manipulation library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217366 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-11-28 12:15 EST ------- Got again rpmlint warnings on i386 binary rpm as W: libnl incoherent-version-in-changelog 1.0-0.1.pre6..fc7 1.0-0.1.pre6.fc7 The last entry in %changelog contains a version identifier that is not coherent with the epoch:version-release tuple of the package. ==>Change 1.0-0.1.pre6.%{?dist} to 1.0-0.1.pre6%{?dist} W: libnl unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib/libnl.so.1.0-pre6 =>> Please compile with debug symbols and let rpm automatically extract them out into the debuginfo package. W: libnl no-documentation The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include documentation files. ==> You forgot %doc line in SPEC. include it. Also on -devel as W: libnl-devel no-dependency-on libnl try using under %package Requires: %{name} = %{version} Update Package -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 28 17:16:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2006 12:16:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217524] Review Request: libsyncml - SyncML protocol library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611281716.kASHGKbQ008280@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libsyncml - SyncML protocol library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217524 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-11-28 12:16 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and RPMS. + source files match upstream. 66fad49f54e78ce34c1453c62958e037 libsyncml-0.4.2.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. License text included in package. + %doc is small; no -doc subpackage required. + %doc does not affect runtime. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + libsyncml-1.0.pc file present. + -devel subpackage exists + included %post -p /sbin/ldconfig %postun -p /sbin/ldconfig + no .la files. + no translations are available + Dose owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 28 17:23:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2006 12:23:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217557] Review Request: keurocalc - KEuroCalc is a universal currency converter and calculator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611281723.kASHNWKX008842@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: keurocalc - KEuroCalc is a universal currency converter and calculator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217557 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-11-28 12:23 EST ------- taking this for review -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 28 17:25:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2006 12:25:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217557] Review Request: keurocalc - KEuroCalc is a universal currency converter and calculator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611281725.kASHPUfr009090@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: keurocalc - KEuroCalc is a universal currency converter and calculator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217557 cgoorah at yahoo.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163776 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2006-11-28 12:25 EST ------- for some reason, i could access it, perhaps because it's an alias. http://chitlesh.ch.funpic.de/fedora/SPECS/keurocalc.spec http://chitlesh.ch.funpic.de/fedora/SRPM/keurocalc-0.9.7-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 28 17:28:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2006 12:28:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217557] Review Request: keurocalc - KEuroCalc is a universal currency converter and calculator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611281728.kASHSqiQ009366@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: keurocalc - KEuroCalc is a universal currency converter and calculator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217557 cgoorah at yahoo.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2006-11-28 12:28 EST ------- Sorry there was middle-air-collision: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | Fixing it up. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 28 17:30:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2006 12:30:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217524] Review Request: libsyncml - SyncML protocol library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611281730.kASHUZuW009545@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libsyncml - SyncML protocol library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217524 ------- Additional Comments From laurent.rineau__fedora_extras at normalesup.org 2006-11-28 12:30 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > + package builds in mock (development i386). Can you explain how you have used mock? wbxml2 packages are not pushed in FE, for now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 28 17:40:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2006 12:40:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217557] Review Request: keurocalc - KEuroCalc is a universal currency converter and calculator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611281740.kASHeiFA010529@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: keurocalc - KEuroCalc is a universal currency converter and calculator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217557 ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2006-11-28 12:40 EST ------- Just retried from several different places, via diferent internet providers. FRom None of them was the link accessible. All end in something similar to 19:38:23 (110 MB/s) - `403.html' saved [1777/1777] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 28 17:40:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2006 12:40:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217524] Review Request: libsyncml - SyncML protocol library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611281740.kASHex5q010555@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libsyncml - SyncML protocol library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217524 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-11-28 12:40 EST ------- yes. I usually do following trick. Just add newly created rpms in your extras repository. I never got to use online repository. I always created own mock environment locally as its easy for me to add new rpms and test other packages dependent on this new rpms. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 28 17:47:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2006 12:47:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217524] Review Request: libsyncml - SyncML protocol library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611281747.kASHlile011054@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libsyncml - SyncML protocol library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217524 laurent.rineau__fedora_extras at normalesup.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From laurent.rineau__fedora_extras at normalesup.org 2006-11-28 12:47 EST ------- Imported and build. Build job http://buildsys.fedoraproject.org/build-status/job.psp?uid=22528 successful. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 28 17:51:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2006 12:51:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217557] Review Request: keurocalc - KEuroCalc is a universal currency converter and calculator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611281751.kASHpnFW011313@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: keurocalc - KEuroCalc is a universal currency converter and calculator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217557 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-11-28 12:51 EST ------- Chitlesh thanks. manuel wolfshant, It worked for me without problem. Infact links in initial and comment 3 are both working for me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 28 17:54:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2006 12:54:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217557] Review Request: keurocalc - KEuroCalc is a universal currency converter and calculator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611281754.kASHsb43011515@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: keurocalc - KEuroCalc is a universal currency converter and calculator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217557 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2006-11-28 12:54 EST ------- manuel wolfshant, check these http://strasbourg.linuxfr.org/~chit/keurocalc.spec http://strasbourg.linuxfr.org/~chit/keurocalc-0.9.7-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 28 18:05:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2006 13:05:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217557] Review Request: keurocalc - KEuroCalc is a universal currency converter and calculator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611281805.kASI5mhq012475@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: keurocalc - KEuroCalc is a universal currency converter and calculator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217557 ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2006-11-28 13:05 EST ------- Thanks, these ones do work. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 28 18:05:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2006 13:05:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214764] Review Request: hunspell - split hunspell out from OpenOffice.org In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611281805.kASI5qIa012496@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hunspell - split hunspell out from OpenOffice.org https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214764 caolanm at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From caolanm at redhat.com 2006-11-28 13:05 EST ------- all done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 28 18:12:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2006 13:12:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217557] Review Request: keurocalc - KEuroCalc is a universal currency converter and calculator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611281812.kASICC8U013152@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: keurocalc - KEuroCalc is a universal currency converter and calculator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217557 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-11-28 13:12 EST ------- Chitlesh, Just did build (NOT mock)on my i386 system and I got many rpmlint warnings on binary i386 rpm 1)Got many The symbolic link points nowhere warnings. 2)can you check following command output and correct desktop file? desktop-file-validate keurocalc.desktop I don't think i need to specify all them here. Time for me to go bed. Rest will see tomorrow. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 28 18:15:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2006 13:15:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216734] Review Request: gnome-compiz-manager - compiz configuration utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611281815.kASIFWjw013527@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-compiz-manager - compiz configuration utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216734 jpmahowald at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- URL| |http://gandalfn.wordpress.co | |m/gnome-compiz-manager/ ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2006-11-28 13:15 EST ------- (In reply to comment #9) > 0.9.13.1 is out. Any chances of an update? Sure. Spec URL: http://fedorared.org/repos/rpmbuild/SPECS/gnome-compiz-manager.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorared.org/fedora/review/gnome-compiz-manager-0.9.13.1-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 28 18:26:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2006 13:26:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217275] Review Request: ocsinventory-client - Open Computer and Software Inventory Next Generation client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611281826.kASIQLCU014770@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocsinventory-client - Open Computer and Software Inventory Next Generation client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217275 ------- Additional Comments From Fedora at FamilleCollet.com 2006-11-28 13:26 EST ------- > In that case you can add a Requires on the directories, or have > ocsinventory-client own those directories, until they get owned by > the filesystem package. Is this a MUST for the review ? I look at some core package and don't see anything... Some improvement to have ocsinventory-client build and work on RHEL and older FC (i really need this at work). Spec URL: http://remi.collet.free.fr/rpms/extras/ocsinventory-client.spec SRPM URL: http://remi.collet.free.fr/rpms/extras/ocsinventory-client-1.0-0.4.RC3.fc7.src.rpm * Tue Nov 28 2006 Remi Collet 1.0-0.4.RC3 - requires %%{_sbindir}/dmidecode (kernel-utils in FC3) rather than dmidecode - requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT) only on Fedora (not provided on RHEL3) - patch improved (Fedora is RPM based) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 28 19:39:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2006 14:39:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217311] Review Request: xarchiver - Archive manager for Xfce In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611281939.kASJdlmB020952@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xarchiver - Archive manager for Xfce https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217311 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at christoph-wickert.de 2006-11-28 14:39 EST ------- Thanks for catching these. I added the missing Requires to the specfile. Also updated desktop-file-install to add more mime-types (application/x-ar, application/x-cd-image, application/x-deb, application/x-rpm, ...) to xarchiver.desktop. Yesterday I updated to 0.4.4, today I found 0.4.6 released. Fixes the icon issue from comment #2, no changes regarding the unused direct dependencies. Most of the xfce pacakges are really bad in this. SPEC: http://home.arcor.de/christoph.wickert/fedora/extras/review/SPECS/xarchiver.spec SRPM: http://home.arcor.de/christoph.wickert/fedora/extras/review/SRPMS/xarchiver-0.4.6-1.fc7.src.rpm I will contact upstream about the deb thing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 28 20:08:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2006 15:08:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217366] Review Request: libnl - netlink sockets support/manipulation library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611282008.kASK8WPw023362@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libnl - netlink sockets support/manipulation library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217366 ------- Additional Comments From nhorman at redhat.com 2006-11-28 15:08 EST ------- The other items are no issue, I'm taking care of them now, but the unstripped-binary-or-object warning is confusing to me. I'm looking at it, and as it currently stands, libnl.so.1.0-pre6 is currently being built with debug information in place (just do a readlelf -w /usr/lib/libnl.so.1 to see all the contained dwarf information). Yet, rpmbuild is failing to strip the binary and place its dwarf info in the debuginfo package. Is there any way to force a library to get included in the debuginfo package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 28 20:09:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2006 15:09:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217066] Review Request: python-gpod - A python module to access iPod content In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611282009.kASK9ibU023418@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-gpod - A python module to access iPod content Alias: python-gpod-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217066 ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at ameritech.net 2006-11-28 15:09 EST ------- Todd, with the upcoming merging of Core & Extras does it make sense to create a separate package for the python bindings? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 28 20:25:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2006 15:25:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217066] Review Request: python-gpod - A python module to access iPod content In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611282025.kASKPplG024371@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-gpod - A python module to access iPod content Alias: python-gpod-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217066 ------- Additional Comments From tmz at pobox.com 2006-11-28 15:25 EST ------- I don't know what the timeframe is for that merging. It would mean that there are no python bindings for libgpod in FC5 and FC6, wouldn't it? I got the impression from from of the other bugs and threads referenced in those bugs on f-maintainers and f-e-l that there were folks who wanted to make use of these bindings now. Even after the merger, might it not be a good thing to have the python bindings packaged separately? If so, then when things get merged the specfile for libgpod can just add the BRs for the python bindings and add it as a subpackage. I'd already planned to keep close watch on libgpod in core and work with AlexL on any issues that might come up. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 28 20:41:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2006 15:41:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 174377] Review Request: gnu-smalltalk - GNU Smalltalk In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611282041.kASKf78j025860@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnu-smalltalk - GNU Smalltalk https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174377 ------- Additional Comments From Jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2006-11-28 15:41 EST ------- Sorry, but the Shebang fixing stuff is necessary anymore. Please see: /usr/share/gnu-smalltalk/Test.st -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 28 21:14:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2006 16:14:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217275] Review Request: ocsinventory-client - Open Computer and Software Inventory Next Generation client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611282114.kASLE1h6028907@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocsinventory-client - Open Computer and Software Inventory Next Generation client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217275 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-11-28 16:13 EST ------- (In reply to comment #7) > > In that case you can add a Requires on the directories, or have > > ocsinventory-client own those directories, until they get owned by > > the filesystem package. > > Is this a MUST for the review ? Yes. I make exception for /usr/share/icons/hicolor. In the packaging guidelines it is at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-a5931a7372c4a00065713430984fa5875513e6d4 And in that case I think it is relevant, since it materializes whether you want to have a real dependency on logrotate/cron or make logrotate/cron optional - which means that the package owns the directory. > I look at some core package and don't see anything... Most core packages haven't gone through the guidelines and lacks the fedora extras packages quality. > Some improvement to have ocsinventory-client build and work on RHEL and older FC > (i really need this at work). With EPEL, this is indeed something acceptable or even encouraged. Besides in that case it doesn't really hurt legibility. > Spec URL: http://remi.collet.free.fr/rpms/extras/ocsinventory-client.spec > SRPM URL: > http://remi.collet.free.fr/rpms/extras/ocsinventory-client-1.0-0.4.RC3.fc7.src.rpm > > * Tue Nov 28 2006 Remi Collet 1.0-0.4.RC3 > - requires %%{_sbindir}/dmidecode (kernel-utils in FC3) rather than dmidecode > - requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT) only on Fedora (not provided on RHEL3) > - patch improved (Fedora is RPM based) Apart from directory owning, seems right. Notice that I didn't assign the bug to myself, so a reviewer accepting unowned directories for those directories can step up. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 28 21:21:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2006 16:21:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217366] Review Request: libnl - netlink sockets support/manipulation library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611282121.kASLLfme030053@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libnl - netlink sockets support/manipulation library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217366 ------- Additional Comments From nhorman at redhat.com 2006-11-28 16:21 EST ------- scratch that last comment, figured it out: install stage was converting DSO's to be non-executable, so they weren't getting packaged in debuginfo. New package ready and available for review: SPEC File: http://people.redhat.com/nhorman/rpms/libnl.spec SRPM: http://people.redhat.com/nhorman/rpms/libnl-1.0-0.2.pre6.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 28 21:42:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2006 16:42:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 208396] Review Request: v4l2-tool - Tool to get webcam usage Information In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611282142.kASLg75Z000560@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: v4l2-tool - Tool to get webcam usage Information https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208396 michel.salim at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |michel.salim at gmail.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From michel.salim at gmail.com 2006-11-28 16:42 EST ------- I'll do the review - I can't review the functionality, though, since I'm webcamless. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 28 21:43:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2006 16:43:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213594] Review Request: eclipse-phpeclipse In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611282143.kASLhMIZ000761@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-phpeclipse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213594 ------- Additional Comments From bkonrath at redhat.com 2006-11-28 16:43 EST ------- (In reply to comment #10) > Ben, I tried using `eclipse` to do my build, but every time it died with a > 'Could not open Display' error. With or without '-noSplash', I couldn't get it > to work. Is there another trick to get eclipse to run command-line-only? No, I can't think of anything off hand. It should be ok to use what you have in -11 but just set the osgi.sharedConfiguration.area property: java -cp $SDK/startup.jar \ -Dosgi.sharedConfiguration.area=%{_libdir}/eclipse/configuration \ .... Let me know if you have any other questions. Ben -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 28 22:03:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2006 17:03:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217311] Review Request: xarchiver - Archive manager for Xfce In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611282203.kASM3r5j002255@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xarchiver - Archive manager for Xfce https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217311 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-11-28 17:03 EST ------- I don't think the x-lha and x-lhz should be in mime in .desktop file since lha is not in fedora. I think it is the same for x-rar. I also don't think that deb and rpm should be included in the mime handled by xarchiver since it doesn't really seems to handle rpm or deb as rpm or deb but unarchive them. x-ar seems wrong to me too. Regarding htmlview, a patch is also needed, currently it is not used in the code! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 28 22:14:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2006 17:14:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217603] New: Review Request: tachyon - Parallel / Multiprocessor Ray Tracing System Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217603 Summary: Review Request: tachyon - Parallel / Multiprocessor Ray Tracing System Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rpm at greysector.net QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://rpm.greysector.net/extras/tachyon.spec SRPM URL: http://rpm.greysector.net/extras/tachyon-0.97-1.src.rpm Description: A portable, high performance parallel ray tracing system supporting MPI and multithreaded implementations. Tachyon is built as a C callable library, which can be used with the included demo programs or within your own application. The distribution also includes a simple scene file parser front-end which reads a few different formats. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 28 22:23:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2006 17:23:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 211728] Review Request: stklos - Scheme Interpreter/Compiler System In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611282223.kASMN9fB003913@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: stklos - Scheme Interpreter/Compiler System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211728 michel.salim at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |michel.salim at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From michel.salim at gmail.com 2006-11-28 17:22 EST ------- Is the upstream developer planning to support GTK2 soon? This looks really interesting. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 28 22:25:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2006 17:25:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217605] New: Review Request:
- Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217605 Summary: Review Request:
- Product: Fedora Core Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: wrebel at terra.com.br QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Component: Software Updater Summary: TBe634e670 __init__.py:767:downloadHeader:RepoError: failure: pango-devel-1.14.8-1.fc6.i386.rpm from updates: [Errno 256] No more mirrors to try. Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/sbin/pup", line 433, in _apply self.applyChanges(self.mainwin) File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/pirut/__init__.py", line 559, in applyChanges self.checkDeps(mainwin) File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/pirut/__init__.py", line 324, in checkDeps self.populateTs(keepold=0) File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/yum/depsolve.py", line 153, in populateTs self.downloadHeader(txmbr.po) File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/yum/__init__.py", line 767, in downloadHeader raise Errors.RepoError, saved_repo_error RepoError: failure: pango-devel-1.14.8-1.fc6.i386.rpm from updates: [Errno 256] No more mirrors to try. Local variables in innermost frame: errors: {} e: [Errno 2] Arquivo ou diret?rio n?o encontrado: '//var/cache/yum/updates/headers/pango-devel-1.14.8-1.fc6.i386.hdr' self: <__main__.PackageUpdater object at 0x871c9cc> saved_repo_error: failure: pango-devel-1.14.8-1.fc6.i386.rpm from updates: [Errno 256] No more mirrors to try. repo: updates checkfunc: (>, (, 1), {}) local: //var/cache/yum/updates/headers/pango-devel-1.14.8-1.fc6.i386.hdr po: pango-devel - 1.14.8-1.fc6.i386 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 28 22:26:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2006 17:26:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217605] Review Request:
- In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611282226.kASMQxUA004326@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request:
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217605 wrebel at terra.com.br changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request:
- - |summary here> -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 28 22:42:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2006 17:42:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217605] Review Request:
- In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611282242.kASMg6Fo005846@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request:
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217605 notting at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|Package Review |pirut AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |katzj at redhat.com QAContact|extras-qa at fedoraproject.org | CC|notting at redhat.com, fedora- | |package-review at redhat.com | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 28 23:02:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2006 18:02:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 209260] Review Request: beryl-manager - Beryl window decorator and theme management utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611282302.kASN2gM2006845@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: beryl-manager - Beryl window decorator and theme management utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209260 ------- Additional Comments From mr.ecik at gmail.com 2006-11-28 18:02 EST ------- Is there any progress with language directories ownership? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 28 23:23:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2006 18:23:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217617] New: Review Request: memchan - memory-based channels for Tcl Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217617 Summary: Review Request: memchan - memory-based channels for Tcl Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: wart at kobold.org QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.kobold.org/~wart/fedora/memchan.spec SRPM URL: http://www.kobold.org/~wart/fedora/memchan-2.2.1-1.src.rpm Description: Memchan is an extension library to the script language Tcl. It provides several new channel types for in-memory channels and the appropriate commands for their creation. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 28 23:36:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2006 18:36:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217617] Review Request: memchan - memory-based channels for Tcl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611282336.kASNaDsM008653@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: memchan - memory-based channels for Tcl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217617 paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-11-28 18:36 EST ------- %{_libdir}/Memchan%{version}/*.a Is this allowed? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 28 23:42:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2006 18:42:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216734] Review Request: gnome-compiz-manager - compiz configuration utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611282342.kASNgd0T008972@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-compiz-manager - compiz configuration utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216734 ------- Additional Comments From giallu at gmail.com 2006-11-28 18:42 EST ------- Thanks. built in mock and installed in my laptop. So far it seems working so I'm not sure what problem Parag is hitting. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 28 23:51:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2006 18:51:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217617] Review Request: memchan - memory-based channels for Tcl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611282351.kASNp7tf009405@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: memchan - memory-based channels for Tcl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217617 ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2006-11-28 18:51 EST ------- Yes. This is the stub library for linking against memchan. Tcl stub libraries are a cross-platform cross-compiler way of performing dynamic linking. So even though it's a static library, it's really used for dynamic linking: http://wiki.tcl.tk/285 This was also brought up in the 'tile' review: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175425 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 29 00:12:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2006 19:12:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217066] Review Request: python-gpod - A python module to access iPod content In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611290012.kAT0CF7r010582@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-gpod - A python module to access iPod content Alias: python-gpod-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217066 ------- Additional Comments From tmz at pobox.com 2006-11-28 19:12 EST ------- Incidentally, if it's agreeable that the bindings should go into a subpacakge once core and extras merge then the pacakge name may be better set to libgpod-python. This is the name I've used in my own personal packaging of libgpod. I used python-gpod here as it seemed to better follow the package naming guidelines for python modules. But using libgpod-python would make it simpler to just add a -python subpackage to the main libgpod SRPM once the merge happens and the required eyeD3 module is available irrespective of which repo it's in. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 29 00:20:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2006 19:20:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217617] Review Request: memchan - memory-based channels for Tcl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611290020.kAT0KEK0010854@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: memchan - memory-based channels for Tcl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217617 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-11-28 19:20 EST ------- Not a problem - clean in rpmlint Clean in mock (x86) Review Includes docs Spec in UTF 8, US English Constant use of macros Includes devel Upstream matches package Installs clean Uses smp_mflags No permission or ownership issues Not sure on %{_mandir}/mann/*.gz mann? If this is fine, it's good to go in. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 29 00:24:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2006 19:24:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217617] Review Request: memchan - memory-based channels for Tcl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611290024.kAT0OFPk011057@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: memchan - memory-based channels for Tcl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217617 ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2006-11-28 19:24 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > Not sure on > %{_mandir}/mann/*.gz > > mann? > > If this is fine, it's good to go in. mann isn't covered by the FHS, but it's part of the filesystem package and commonly used by Tcl and Tcl extensions for storing man pages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 29 00:52:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2006 19:52:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217311] Review Request: xarchiver - Archive manager for Xfce In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611290052.kAT0qo4R012217@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xarchiver - Archive manager for Xfce https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217311 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at christoph-wickert.de 2006-11-28 19:52 EST ------- (In reply to comment #6) > I don't think the x-lha and x-lhz should be in mime in > .desktop file since lha is not in fedora. I think it is the > same for x-rar. I also don't think that deb and rpm should > be included in the mime handled by xarchiver since it > doesn't really seems to handle rpm or deb as rpm or deb but > unarchive them. x-ar seems wrong to me too. All of these mimetypes are included in file-roller and/or ark packages from Core, too. And why not adding xarchiver for rpms and debs? file-roller or ark also can't do more then list/extact debs/rpms, noone expects an achive manager to install packages. I use file-roller a lot to quickly look into rpms, get the spec from an srpm etc. The default action still is system-install-packages, so IMO adding xarchiver can't do no harm. > Regarding htmlview, a patch is also needed, currently it is > not used in the code! I created a small patch for htmlview, also added epiphany, konqueror and seamonkey. http://home.arcor.de/christoph.wickert/fedora/extras/review/SPECS/xarchiver.spec http://home.arcor.de/christoph.wickert/fedora/extras/review/SRPMS/xarchiver-0.4.6-2.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 29 00:58:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2006 19:58:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217617] Review Request: memchan - memory-based channels for Tcl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611290058.kAT0wdKk012418@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: memchan - memory-based channels for Tcl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217617 paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-11-28 19:58 EST ------- Approved -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 29 01:05:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2006 20:05:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217603] Review Request: tachyon - Parallel / Multiprocessor Ray Tracing System In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611290105.kAT15jAg012802@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tachyon - Parallel / Multiprocessor Ray Tracing System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217603 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-11-28 20:05 EST ------- Well, * does fedora accept '-fomit-frame-pointer -ffast-math'? Usually these make debugging very difficult. * Does '-m486' make semse? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 29 01:12:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2006 20:12:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 200722] Review Request: GraphicsMagick In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611290112.kAT1Csq3013094@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: GraphicsMagick https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200722 ------- Additional Comments From bugs.michael at gmx.net 2006-11-28 20:12 EST ------- owners.list entry is missing! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 29 01:19:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2006 20:19:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217617] Review Request: memchan - memory-based channels for Tcl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611290119.kAT1JdHF013273@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: memchan - memory-based channels for Tcl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217617 wart at kobold.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2006-11-28 20:19 EST ------- Imported and built. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 29 02:25:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2006 21:25:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217557] Review Request: keurocalc - KEuroCalc is a universal currency converter and calculator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611290225.kAT2P1bi015900@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: keurocalc - KEuroCalc is a universal currency converter and calculator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217557 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rdieter at math.unl.edu ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-11-28 21:24 EST ------- > 1)Got many The symbolic link points nowhere warnings. Mostly harmless. It is not uncommon for kde apps to symlink to bits in kdelibs >2)can you check following command output and correct desktop file? >desktop-file-validate keurocalc.desktop desktop-file-utils is buggy wrt many kde .desktop files, see bug #212350 and bug #172423 . Don't take it's warnings/errors as gospel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 29 03:17:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2006 22:17:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 199029] Review Request: jokosher In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611290317.kAT3Hm49018490@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jokosher https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199029 ------- Additional Comments From johnp at redhat.com 2006-11-28 22:17 EST ------- could we have the package install the one plugin it needs (audiopanorama)? It could change the name so it doesn't conflict with a newer gstreamer when introduced and then depend on later gstreamers when released removing the self installed plugin. Jokosher is a really important app and should at least get into devel for testing to speed up developmentment. If need be I can build the CVS version in Rawhide but it would be nice to have FC6 folk get this so they can play around with it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 29 03:20:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2006 22:20:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 174377] Review Request: gnu-smalltalk - GNU Smalltalk In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611290320.kAT3KIuk018713@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnu-smalltalk - GNU Smalltalk https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174377 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-11-28 22:20 EST ------- (In reply to comment #50) > Sorry, but the Shebang fixing stuff is necessary anymore. > > Please see: /usr/share/gnu-smalltalk/Test.st Well, ------------------------------------------ [tasaka1 at dhcp158 smalltalk-2.2c]$ for name in `find . -name \*.st` ; do if grep -q '@bindir@' $name ; then echo $name ; fi ; done ./scripts/Load.st ./scripts/Reload.st ./scripts/Test.st ------------------------------------------ Other files may contain broken shebang, so fixing is necessary, it is correct. So, please fix _only_ the files which requires to be fixed as I have commented in comment #48 and don't change other files. i.e. don't apply ------------------------------------------- sed 's|@bindir@|%{_bindir}|g' <$file >$file.new mv -f $file.new $file ------------------------------------------- to the files which don't need fixing to avoid timestamps change. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 29 03:33:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2006 22:33:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 212889] Review Request: php-pear-Testing-Selenium - PHP Client for Selenium RC In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611290333.kAT3X2Wv019693@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Testing-Selenium - PHP Client for Selenium RC Alias: pear-Test-Selenium https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212889 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-11-28 22:32 EST ------- Seems like this one slipped through the cracks. I note that 0.2.1 is out now. I'll review what you have now but feel free to update. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 29 03:48:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2006 22:48:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217603] Review Request: tachyon - Parallel / Multiprocessor Ray Tracing System In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611290348.kAT3mtx8020904@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tachyon - Parallel / Multiprocessor Ray Tracing System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217603 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2006-11-28 22:48 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > * does fedora accept '-fomit-frame-pointer -ffast-math'? > Usually these make debugging very difficult. > * Does '-m486' make semse? Generally speaking, without having looking into the package: No and no. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 29 03:57:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2006 22:57:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 196837] Review Request: php-pear-PHPUnit3 - PEAR: Regression testing framework for unit tests In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611290357.kAT3vL9n021532@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-PHPUnit3 - PEAR: Regression testing framework for unit tests Alias: pear-PHPUnit3 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196837 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-11-28 22:57 EST ------- So what did you end up deciding to do here? I don't see a problem with a package that sets up the channel; it seems to be the most reasonable thing to do here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 29 04:06:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2006 23:06:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217557] Review Request: keurocalc - KEuroCalc is a universal currency converter and calculator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611290406.kAT46Po6022376@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: keurocalc - KEuroCalc is a universal currency converter and calculator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217557 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-11-28 23:06 EST ------- thanks for that information Rex -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 29 04:08:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2006 23:08:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216734] Review Request: gnome-compiz-manager - compiz configuration utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611290408.kAT48bCU022618@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-compiz-manager - compiz configuration utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216734 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-11-28 23:08 EST ------- giallu, I really not understanding whats happening at my end. I am using FC6 system with very less installed updates system. I tried to build on it using rpmbuild --rebuild gnome-compiz-manager-0.9.13.1-1.src.rpm and then installed all binary RPMS but still getting bug buddy appearing to report buglog. My compiz must be running while using this package right?? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 29 04:14:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2006 23:14:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 208396] Review Request: v4l2-tool - Tool to get webcam usage Information In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611290414.kAT4ERKB023268@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: v4l2-tool - Tool to get webcam usage Information https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208396 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-11-28 23:14 EST ------- Thanks. Feel free to ask me anything about this package usage. Even you can test its some functionality without webcam. You just need to fill USB IDs of any webcam say for Logitech Quickcam Image Vendor ID 046d Product ID 08a7 and you will get information about whether its supported by uvcvideo or gspca drivers or not. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 29 04:31:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2006 23:31:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217366] Review Request: libnl - netlink sockets support/manipulation library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611290431.kAT4VD49025207@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libnl - netlink sockets support/manipulation library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217366 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-11-28 23:31 EST ------- Got mock build error you may need to doxygen as BR. Kindly check your package in mock and then submit new links -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 29 04:34:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2006 23:34:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 196837] Review Request: php-pear-PHPUnit3 - PEAR: Regression testing framework for unit tests In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611290434.kAT4YQDv025595@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-PHPUnit3 - PEAR: Regression testing framework for unit tests Alias: pear-PHPUnit3 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196837 ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2006-11-28 23:34 EST ------- We have to figure out if phpunit3 actually replaces phpunit 1 and 2. Remi said that it doesn't provide phpunit.php so I have to investigate further. In addition 3.0.0 final was released about a week or so ago, so I need to update the spec for the stable version. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 29 04:39:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2006 23:39:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213594] Review Request: eclipse-phpeclipse In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611290439.kAT4dkIi026194@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-phpeclipse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213594 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at theholbrooks.org 2006-11-28 23:39 EST ------- Spec URL: http://theholbrooks.org/RPMS/eclipse-phpeclipse.spec SRPM URL: http://theholbrooks.org/RPMS/eclipse-phpeclipse-1.1.8-12.src.rpm Okay I've added that configuration line, but have a question or two. The line as you provided it didn't work. /usr/lib64/eclipse/configuration doesn't exist on my system (or in /usr/lib/ on my i386 system), nor has yum ever heard of a package providing said directory. There IS, however, a /usr/share/eclipse/configuration, which looks like it contains the proper contents. SO, I changed the line you gave to =%{_datadir}/eclipse/configuration and everything started working beautifully. Is there some other configuration info that is supposed to exist in libdir that I don't have, or was your line just a mistype? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 29 04:43:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2006 23:43:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217557] Review Request: keurocalc - KEuroCalc is a universal currency converter and calculator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611290443.kAT4hWAa026612@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: keurocalc - KEuroCalc is a universal currency converter and calculator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217557 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-11-28 23:43 EST ------- But i do found something done for symlink warnings in bug #213432 is that similar to this case? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 29 05:22:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2006 00:22:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217557] Review Request: keurocalc - KEuroCalc is a universal currency converter and calculator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611290522.kAT5McWD029382@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: keurocalc - KEuroCalc is a universal currency converter and calculator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217557 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-11-29 00:22 EST ------- You mean simply changing absolute symlinks to relative ones? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 29 05:25:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2006 00:25:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217557] Review Request: keurocalc - KEuroCalc is a universal currency converter and calculator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611290525.kAT5PKNJ029449@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: keurocalc - KEuroCalc is a universal currency converter and calculator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217557 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-11-29 00:25 EST ------- (In reply to comment #13) > You mean simply changing absolute symlinks to relative ones? is that possible and will be working in kde package case.? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 29 05:25:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2006 00:25:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217557] Review Request: keurocalc - KEuroCalc is a universal currency converter and calculator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611290525.kAT5PkF4029472@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: keurocalc - KEuroCalc is a universal currency converter and calculator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217557 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-11-29 00:25 EST ------- Anyways here comes Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and but NOT for RPMS. But those warnings can be ignored as said in comment #10. + source files match upstream. d2e22dcbba267549bf3a93ed8bf715c2 keurocalc-0.9.7.tgz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. License text included in package. + %doc is small; no -doc subpackage required. + %doc does not affect runtime. + COPYING included in %doc. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel or any subpackages exists + no .la files. + no translations are available + Dose owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + Desktop files are not handled in usual way but its ok. + Used properly gtk-update-icon-cache scriptlet -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 29 05:46:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2006 00:46:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217654] New: Review Request: TMDA - Tagged Message Delivery Agent Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217654 Summary: Review Request: TMDA - Tagged Message Delivery Agent Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: bjohnson at symetrix.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.symetrix.com/~bjohnson/projects/Fedora-Extras/tmda.spec SRPM URL: http://www.symetrix.com/~bjohnson/projects/Fedora-Extras/tmda-1.1.9-1.fc6.src.rpm Description: TMDA is an open source anti-spam system and local mail delivery agent. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 29 05:55:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2006 00:55:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217654] Review Request: TMDA - Tagged Message Delivery Agent In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611290555.kAT5tbL4030316@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: TMDA - Tagged Message Delivery Agent https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217654 bjohnson at symetrix.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2006-11-29 00:55 EST ------- I would appreciate comments on the rpmlint output (my explanations in parenthesis): E: tmda zero-length /usr/share/doc/tmda-1.1.9/contrib/dot-tmda/lists/blacklist E: tmda zero-length /usr/share/doc/tmda-1.1.9/contrib/dot-tmda/lists/confirmed E: tmda zero-length /usr/share/doc/tmda-1.1.9/contrib/dot-tmda/crypt_key (these are zero byte files from upstream contrib) W: tmda doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/tmda-1.1.9/contrib/update-internaldomains /usr/bin/env W: tmda doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/tmda-1.1.9/contrib/update-internaldomains perl(Getopt::Std) W: tmda doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/tmda-1.1.9/contrib/update-internaldomains perl(strict) W: tmda doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/tmda-1.1.9/contrib/ofmipd-stunnel-xinetd/stunnel-wrapper /bin/sh W: tmda doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/tmda-1.1.9/contrib/ofmipd-stunnel-xinetd/tmda-ofmipd-wrapper /bin/sh W: tmda doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/tmda-1.1.9/contrib/sendit.sh /bin/sh W: tmda doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/tmda-1.1.9/contrib/vadduser-tmda /bin/sh W: tmda doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/tmda-1.1.9/contrib/vmailmgr-vdir.sh /bin/sh W: tmda doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/tmda-1.1.9/contrib/vpopmail-vdir.sh /bin/sh W: tmda doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/tmda-1.1.9/contrib/wrapfd3.sh /bin/sh (these are contrib files from upstream - no real dependency as they are %doc) W: tmda-emacs no-documentation W: tmda-ofmipd no-documentation E: tmda-ofmipd use-tmp-in-%pre (%pre creates user with /var/tmp as home directory - %pre does not use /tmp) W: tmda-ofmipd dangerous-command-in-%postun userdel (if we create a user, shouldn't we also remove it when the package is removed?) W: tmda-ofmipd service-default-enabled /etc/rc.d/init.d/tofmipd (will patch upstream file in a future rev) W: tmda-ofmipd no-reload-entry /etc/rc.d/init.d/tofmipd (does not support reload) W: tmda-ofmipd incoherent-init-script-name tofmipd (named from upstream; also daemon is a different name (TMDA Old Fashioned Mail Injection Protocol Daemon - tofmipd) - not the TMDA program itself) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 29 06:07:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2006 01:07:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 199029] Review Request: jokosher In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611290607.kAT67SKV030644@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jokosher https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199029 bdpepple at ameritech.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn|213798 | ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at ameritech.net 2006-11-29 01:07 EST ------- (In reply to comment #45) > Jokosher is a really important app and should at least get > into devel for testing to speed up developmentment. > > If need be I can build the CVS version in Rawhide but it would be nice to have > FC6 folk get this so they can play around with it. I agree that we should try our best to get this into Extras as soon as possible, but realistically between FESCo and my other projects, I'm not going to have much free time to work on this. So if someone in the cc' list wants to take the ball and run with it, please feel free to. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 29 06:08:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2006 01:08:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213798] Review Request: python-alsaaudio - Python Alsa Bindings In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611290608.kAT683MG030705@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-alsaaudio - Python Alsa Bindings https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213798 bdpepple at ameritech.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|199029 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 29 07:03:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2006 02:03:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217658] New: Review Request: urlgfe - Urlgfe download manager Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217658 Summary: Review Request: urlgfe - Urlgfe download manager Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~mtasaka/dist/extras/development/SPECS/urlgfe.spec SRPM URL: http://www.ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~mtasaka/dist/extras/development/SRPMS/urlgfe-1.0-1.src.rpm Description: Urlgfe is a download manager that uses GTK+2 ,libcurl, and pcre. It allows you to classify URLs before downloading them, and allows you to import URLs from HTML files. Every category has an independent configuration that can be inherited by each download in that category. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 29 07:14:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2006 02:14:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 211433] Review Request: wdm - WINGs Display Manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611290714.kAT7ERDN000675@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wdm - WINGs Display Manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211433 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-11-29 02:14 EST ------- Well, this package creates a lot of rpmlint complaints. --------------------------------------------------------------- W: wdm dangling-relative-symlink /etc/wdm/GiveConsole ../X11/xdm/GiveConsole W: wdm dangling-relative-symlink /etc/wdm/Xaccess ../X11/xdm/Xaccess E: wdm executable-marked-as-config-file /etc/wdm/Xsession E: wdm script-without-shebang /etc/wdm/Xsession E: wdm executable-marked-as-config-file /etc/wdm/Xsetup_0.wdm W: wdm dangling-relative-symlink /etc/wdm/Xsetup_0 ../X11/xdm/Xsetup_0 E: wdm wrong-script-interpreter /etc/wdm/Xclients.in "@SHELL_LOGIN@" E: wdm non-executable-script /etc/wdm/Xclients.in 0644 E: wdm executable-marked-as-config-file /etc/wdm/Xclients E: wdm non-executable-script /etc/wdm/Xsession.orig 0644 E: wdm executable-marked-as-config-file /etc/wdm/TakeConsole.wdm W: wdm dangling-relative-symlink /etc/wdm/TakeConsole ../X11/xdm/TakeConsole E: wdm executable-marked-as-config-file /etc/wdm/GiveConsole.wdm E: wdm non-standard-dir-perm /etc/wdm/authdir 0700 E: wdm executable-marked-as-config-file /etc/wdm/Xsession.wdm E: wdm executable-marked-as-config-file /etc/wdm/Xsession.XFree86 W: wdm strange-permission wdm-update_wdm_wmlist 0755 -------------------------------------------------------------- Would you explain * which ones can be ignored and why * which ones should be fixed before I install this package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 29 07:43:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2006 02:43:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216131] Review Request: glest-data - Data files for the game Glest In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611290743.kAT7hqfC001364@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glest-data - Data files for the game Glest Alias: glest-data https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216131 gauret at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From gauret at free.fr 2006-11-29 02:43 EST ------- Imported and built, thanks for the review ! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 29 07:44:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2006 02:44:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216130] Review Request: glest - 3D real time strategy game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611290744.kAT7i41d001393@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glest - 3D real time strategy game Alias: glest https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216130 gauret at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Bug 216130 depends on bug 216131, which changed state. Bug 216131 Summary: Review Request: glest-data - Data files for the game Glest https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216131 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED ------- Additional Comments From gauret at free.fr 2006-11-29 02:43 EST ------- Imported and built, thanks for the review ! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 29 07:44:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2006 02:44:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216130] Review Request: glest - 3D real time strategy game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611290744.kAT7i85i001405@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glest - 3D real time strategy game Alias: glest https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216130 gauret at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Bug 216130 depends on bug 216131, which changed state. Bug 216131 Summary: Review Request: glest-data - Data files for the game Glest https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216131 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED ------- Additional Comments From gauret at free.fr 2006-11-29 02:43 EST ------- Imported and built, thanks for the review ! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 29 08:15:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2006 03:15:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 174377] Review Request: gnu-smalltalk - GNU Smalltalk In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611290815.kAT8FuCa002249@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnu-smalltalk - GNU Smalltalk https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174377 ------- Additional Comments From bonzini at gnu.org 2006-11-29 03:15 EST ------- These three files need not be installed; you can rm the three files identified by Mamoru Tasaka safely. It will be fixed upstream in 2.3. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 29 08:27:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2006 03:27:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217658] Review Request: urlgfe - Urlgfe download manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611290827.kAT8RLH7002819@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: urlgfe - Urlgfe download manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217658 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 29 09:05:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2006 04:05:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217658] Review Request: urlgfe - Urlgfe download manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611290905.kAT95ONR006226@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: urlgfe - Urlgfe download manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217658 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-11-29 04:05 EST ------- what a cool app:) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 29 09:06:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2006 04:06:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217658] Review Request: urlgfe - Urlgfe download manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611290906.kAT968mx006370@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: urlgfe - Urlgfe download manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217658 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-11-29 04:06 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and RPMS. + source files match upstream. 9a5284665e09cac3397c3ea5d7baf6d8 urlgfe-1.0.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. License text included in package. + %doc is small; no -doc subpackage required. + %doc does not affect runtime. + COPYING included in %doc. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage exists + no .la files. + translations are available + Dose owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + Desktop file installed succesfully + Desktop file is handled correclty in SPEC file. + GUI app APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 29 09:15:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2006 04:15:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216734] Review Request: gnome-compiz-manager - compiz configuration utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611290915.kAT9F0Xf007417@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-compiz-manager - compiz configuration utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216734 ------- Additional Comments From giallu at gmail.com 2006-11-29 04:14 EST ------- (In reply to comment #12) > giallu, > I really not understanding whats happening at my end. I am using FC6 system > with very less installed updates system. I tried to build on it using > rpmbuild --rebuild gnome-compiz-manager-0.9.13.1-1.src.rpm > and then installed all binary RPMS but still getting bug buddy appearing to > report buglog. Exactly, which application is crashing ? it should be written in the opened bug buddy window. > My compiz must be running while using this package right?? Not necessarily. AFAICT, you can use the included gnome try icon (or the preferences) to activate desktop effects. However, I noticed some strange things: 1. on first rpm install it said: gconfd-2: no process killed 2. starting the desktop session is significantly slower than before -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 29 09:33:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2006 04:33:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 211433] Review Request: wdm - WINGs Display Manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611290933.kAT9Xlvs008876@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wdm - WINGs Display Manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211433 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-11-29 04:33 EST ------- (In reply to comment #7) Most should be ignorable. > W: wdm dangling-relative-symlink /etc/wdm/GiveConsole ../X11/xdm/GiveConsole > W: wdm dangling-relative-symlink /etc/wdm/Xaccess ../X11/xdm/Xaccess > W: wdm dangling-relative-symlink /etc/wdm/Xsetup_0 ../X11/xdm/Xsetup_0 > W: wdm dangling-relative-symlink /etc/wdm/TakeConsole ../X11/xdm/TakeConsole Symlinks to xdm scripts to avoid duplicating, and also because they are more recent and maintained as part of xdm. > E: wdm executable-marked-as-config-file /etc/wdm/Xsession That's a session script, rightly located in /etc/ > E: wdm non-standard-dir-perm /etc/wdm/authdir 0700 restricted permissions for a directory holding sensitive files. > E: wdm non-executable-script /etc/wdm/Xsession.orig 0644 > E: wdm executable-marked-as-config-file /etc/wdm/TakeConsole.wdm > E: wdm executable-marked-as-config-file /etc/wdm/Xsetup_0.wdm > E: wdm executable-marked-as-config-file /etc/wdm/GiveConsole.wdm > E: wdm executable-marked-as-config-file /etc/wdm/Xsession.wdm > E: wdm executable-marked-as-config-file /etc/wdm/Xsession.XFree86 Other session scripts. They could be in %doc, but I think that it is better to have them right in the config dir, such that it is easy to switch to them. Xsession.orig is not set executable upstream, it is the original X11R? session script. After reading Xsession.orig and Xsession.XFree86, it seems like they use /tmp insecurely, so I'll remove them. Xsession.wdm too, uses /tmp insecurely but I'll patch it. > W: wdm strange-permission wdm-update_wdm_wmlist 0755 This is a script so executable. > E: wdm wrong-script-interpreter /etc/wdm/Xclients.in "@SHELL_LOGIN@" > E: wdm non-executable-script /etc/wdm/Xclients.in 0644 > E: wdm executable-marked-as-config-file /etc/wdm/Xclients /etc/wdm/Xclients is a session script, and it can be regenerated from Xclients.in using wdmReconfig, it explains the rpmlint errors. It is also not used in the default case, but provided for those who want to use the config from upstream. This one is to be fixed: > E: wdm script-without-shebang /etc/wdm/Xsession I will fix that one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 29 09:49:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2006 04:49:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216734] Review Request: gnome-compiz-manager - compiz configuration utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611290949.kAT9n1qJ009600@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-compiz-manager - compiz configuration utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216734 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-11-29 04:48 EST ------- (In reply to comment #13) > (In reply to comment #12) > > giallu, > > I really not understanding whats happening at my end. I am using FC6 system > > with very less installed updates system. I tried to build on it using > > rpmbuild --rebuild gnome-compiz-manager-0.9.13.1-1.src.rpm > > and then installed all binary RPMS but still getting bug buddy appearing to > > report buglog. > > Exactly, which application is crashing ? it should be written in the opened bug > buddy window. I have already attached in above comments bug report. > > > My compiz must be running while using this package right?? > > Not necessarily. AFAICT, you can use the included gnome try icon (or the > preferences) to activate desktop effects. I always used to use desktop icon from System->Preferences->More Preferences > > However, I noticed some strange things: > 1. on first rpm install it said: gconfd-2: no process killed I also got same thing when i installed rpm > 2. starting the desktop session is significantly slower than before -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 29 09:51:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2006 04:51:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 211433] Review Request: wdm - WINGs Display Manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611290951.kAT9pNWF009774@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wdm - WINGs Display Manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211433 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-11-29 04:51 EST ------- New srpm available: http://www.environnement.ens.fr/perso/dumas/fc-srpms/wdm-1.28-5.src.rpm - fix insecure use of /tmp in original wdm script - remove obsolete session scripts I replaced Xsession.XFree86 by a link to /etc/X11/xdm/Xsession, named Xsession.xorg. rpmlint now gives (on installed package to avoid the symlinks warnings): W: wdm strange-permission wdm-update_wdm_wmlist 0755 A script. E: wdm executable-marked-as-config-file /etc/wdm/Xsession E: wdm executable-marked-as-config-file /etc/wdm/Xsetup_0.wdm E: wdm executable-marked-as-config-file /etc/wdm/Xclients E: wdm executable-marked-as-config-file /etc/wdm/TakeConsole.wdm E: wdm executable-marked-as-config-file /etc/wdm/GiveConsole.wdm E: wdm executable-marked-as-config-file /etc/wdm/Xsession.wdm Session scripts. E: wdm wrong-script-interpreter /etc/wdm/Xclients.in "@SHELL_LOGIN@" E: wdm non-executable-script /etc/wdm/Xclients.in 0644 used by wdmReconfig to regenerate Xclients. E: wdm non-standard-dir-perm /etc/wdm/authdir 0700 directory for sensitive files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 29 10:13:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2006 05:13:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217658] Review Request: urlgfe - Urlgfe download manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611291013.kATAD7YM011037@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: urlgfe - Urlgfe download manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217658 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-11-29 05:13 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > what a cool app:) Thanks! Well, * Rebuild for FE-devel succeeded * SyncNeeded requested for FE5/6 Now I close this bug as CLOSED NEXTRELEASE. Thank you for a quick review and accepting this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 29 10:15:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2006 05:15:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217671] New: Review Request: libhangul - Hangul input library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217671 Summary: Review Request: libhangul - Hangul input library Product: Fedora Core Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: tagoh at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/tagoh/libhangul/libhangul.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/tagoh/libhangul/libhangul-0.0.3-1.src.rpm Description: libhangul provides common features to develop applications that needs Hangul input facilities. This library is required to build scim-hangul. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 29 11:25:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2006 06:25:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215193] Review Request: VLGothic-fonts - Truetype Japanese gothic fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611291125.kATBPMHs016885@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: VLGothic-fonts - Truetype Japanese gothic fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215193 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-11-29 06:25 EST ------- Please close this bug when rebuilding is done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 29 12:07:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2006 07:07:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217603] Review Request: tachyon - Parallel / Multiprocessor Ray Tracing System In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611291207.kATC71G7018458@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tachyon - Parallel / Multiprocessor Ray Tracing System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217603 ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2006-11-29 07:07 EST ------- -m486 gets overridden by subsequent -march. What's wrong with -fomit-frame-pointer and -ffast-math? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 29 13:13:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2006 08:13:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217366] Review Request: libnl - netlink sockets support/manipulation library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611291313.kATDDGLL022541@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libnl - netlink sockets support/manipulation library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217366 ------- Additional Comments From nhorman at redhat.com 2006-11-29 08:13 EST ------- Thats odd, built fine for me in mock. I'll add the BR anyway, since it would seem to make sense and repost -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 29 13:26:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2006 08:26:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217311] Review Request: xarchiver - Archive manager for Xfce In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611291326.kATDQrU1023241@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xarchiver - Archive manager for Xfce https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217311 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-11-29 08:26 EST ------- (In reply to comment #7) > All of these mimetypes are included in file-roller and/or ark packages from > Core, too. That's not a good reason. Since we don't ship lha and rar we shouldn't open the corresponding files. file-roller and ark are broken. Also remember that core packages haven't gone through review and may contain mistakes. This one is not an obvious mistake, it may have been done on purpose, but still it is a mistake in my opinion. x-ar isn't in the mimetype database. x-archive is, but since xarchive fails to open ar archives, I am not sure that it is right. > And why not adding xarchiver for rpms and debs? file-roller or ark > also can't do more then list/extact debs/rpms, noone expects an achive manager > to install packages. I use file-roller a lot to quickly look into rpms, get the > spec from an srpm etc. The default action still is system-install-packages, so > IMO adding xarchiver can't do no harm. Ok for rpm and debs, the system of default seems right to me. And if one don't have the default app (pirut for rpm) installed, why not xarchiver. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 29 13:27:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2006 08:27:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217311] Review Request: xarchiver - Archive manager for Xfce In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611291327.kATDRv8H023338@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xarchiver - Archive manager for Xfce https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217311 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-11-29 08:27 EST ------- I get a segfault with .a. It seems that it is detected as a .deb? (gdb) run Starting program: /usr/bin/xarchiver libz.a [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] [New Thread -1209128752 (LWP 2679)] Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. [Switching to Thread -1209128752 (LWP 2679)] 0x00c971eb in strlen () from /lib/libc.so.6 (gdb) bt #0 0x00c971eb in strlen () from /lib/libc.so.6 #1 0x077a4729 in g_strconcat () from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0 #2 0x0805b91d in OpenDeb (archive=0xa1ddb48) at deb.c:32 #3 0x080580b7 in xa_open_archive (menuitem=0x0, data=0xa1ddb28) at callbacks.c:387 #4 0x0804f78d in main (argc=Cannot access memory at address 0x1 ) at main.c:235 #5 0x00c40e5c in __libc_start_main (main=0x804efb0
, argc=2, ubp_av=0xbfa3d2a4, init=0x806a470 <__libc_csu_init>, fini=0x806a460 <__libc_csu_fini>, rtld_fini=0x727490 <_dl_fini>, stack_end=0xbfa3d29c) at libc-start.c:222 #6 0x0804df41 in _start () (gdb) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 29 13:42:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2006 08:42:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217603] Review Request: tachyon - Parallel / Multiprocessor Ray Tracing System In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611291342.kATDgkYL024580@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tachyon - Parallel / Multiprocessor Ray Tracing System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217603 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-11-29 08:42 EST ------- As I said in comment #1, both optimizations make debugging very difficult. * The former one (-fomit-frame-pointer) may make it impossible to debug by gdb. http://sources.redhat.com/gdb/current/onlinedocs/gdb_7.html * -ffast-math equals ??-fno-math-errno ??-funsafe-math-optimizations ??-fno-trapping-math ??-ffinite-math-only ??-fno-signaling-nans i.e. 1. this optimization means that you trust that there is no mistake like 'taking root of negative number' or so, which is very risky. 2. I don't know if this program needs accuracy, however, -funsafe-math-optimizations usually decreases precision of floating point calculation. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 29 13:59:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2006 08:59:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217366] Review Request: libnl - netlink sockets support/manipulation library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611291359.kATDxvTJ026453@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libnl - netlink sockets support/manipulation library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217366 ------- Additional Comments From nhorman at redhat.com 2006-11-29 08:59 EST ------- New pacakage available here SPEC FILE: http://people.redhat.com/nhorman/rpms/libnl.spec SRPM: http://people.redhat.com/nhorman/rpms/libnl-1.0-0.2.pre6.src.rpm Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 29 14:03:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2006 09:03:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217366] Review Request: libnl - netlink sockets support/manipulation library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611291403.kATE3Upf026999@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libnl - netlink sockets support/manipulation library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217366 ------- Additional Comments From nhorman at redhat.com 2006-11-29 09:03 EST ------- sorry that SRPM url should be: http://people.redhat.com/nhorman/rpms/libnl-1.0-0.3.pre6.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 29 14:58:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2006 09:58:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217366] Review Request: libnl - netlink sockets support/manipulation library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611291458.kATEwRtL031878@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libnl - netlink sockets support/manipulation library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217366 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-11-29 09:58 EST ------- I don't think we can have following message in build.log as blocker doxygen Doxyfile sh: dot: command not found Problems running dot. Check your installation! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 29 15:07:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2006 10:07:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217484] Review Request: rlwrap - Wrapper for GNU readline In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611291507.kATF75tX000346@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rlwrap - Wrapper for GNU readline https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217484 michel.salim at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From michel.salim at gmail.com 2006-11-29 10:06 EST ------- Built in Rawhide. Requesting stable branches now. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 29 15:18:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2006 10:18:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217311] Review Request: xarchiver - Archive manager for Xfce In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611291518.kATFIQYQ001353@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xarchiver - Archive manager for Xfce https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217311 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-11-29 10:18 EST ------- After a quick reading of the code, the .a is indeed considered to be a debian archive because it begins with ! like .deb. It should be better to test for !\ndebian (tests in callback.c line 1195), like libmagic does. But the segfault should be investigated prior. Maybe upstream should better use libmagic to detect file type? Also in /usr/share/file/magic one can see that there are more than one kind of debian archive. Seems like file-roller and ark don't use libmagic, though. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 29 15:20:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2006 10:20:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217311] Review Request: xarchiver - Archive manager for Xfce In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611291520.kATFKUas001601@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xarchiver - Archive manager for Xfce https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217311 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-11-29 10:20 EST ------- Still on the subject of ar archives, ark and file-roller seems to handle them correctly, maybe it could be an interesting feature for xarchiver? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 29 15:23:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2006 10:23:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215193] Review Request: VLGothic-fonts - Truetype Japanese gothic fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611291523.kATFNQGC001910@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: VLGothic-fonts - Truetype Japanese gothic fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215193 ryo-dairiki at users.sourceforge.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 29 15:41:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2006 10:41:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217366] Review Request: libnl - netlink sockets support/manipulation library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611291541.kATFfhJ6003801@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libnl - netlink sockets support/manipulation library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217366 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-11-29 10:41 EST ------- Also can you check Documentation index.html showed 1.0-pre2 it will confuse user as they know they installed 1.0-pre2 or 1.0-pre6 its coming from Doxygen file. So you may consider to patch it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 29 16:24:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2006 11:24:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 174377] Review Request: gnu-smalltalk - GNU Smalltalk In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611291624.kATGO1md007566@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnu-smalltalk - GNU Smalltalk https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174377 ------- Additional Comments From Jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2006-11-29 11:23 EST ------- Next Release: SRPM: http://www.herr-schmitt.de/pub/gnu-smalltalk/gnu-smalltalk-2.2c-4.src.rpm SPEC: http://www.herr-schmitt.de/pub/gnu-smalltalk/gnu-smalltalk.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 29 16:51:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2006 11:51:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 211433] Review Request: wdm - WINGs Display Manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611291651.kATGpsBE010397@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wdm - WINGs Display Manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211433 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-11-29 11:51 EST ------- Well, then my next question is: A-1 : ------------------------------------------------ E: wdm executable-marked-as-config-file /etc/wdm/Xsession E: wdm executable-marked-as-config-file /etc/wdm/Xsetup_0.wdm E: wdm executable-marked-as-config-file /etc/wdm/Xclients E: wdm executable-marked-as-config-file /etc/wdm/TakeConsole.wdm E: wdm executable-marked-as-config-file /etc/wdm/GiveConsole.wdm E: wdm executable-marked-as-config-file /etc/wdm/Xsession.wdm ------------------------------------------------ are these files which rpmlint complains as 'executable-marked-as-config-file' are 'configuration' files? I feel like that configuration for wdm should done by somewhat other files if these files should be customizable. A-2: ---------------------------------------------------- E: wdm wrong-script-interpreter /etc/wdm/Xclients.in "@SHELL_LOGIN@" E: wdm non-executable-script /etc/wdm/Xclients.in 0644 used by wdmReconfig to regenerate Xclients. ---------------------------------------------------- Umm, does /usr/bin/wdmReconfig correctly fix "@SHELL_LOGIN@" in /etc/wdm/Xclients.in? ---------------------------------------------------- [root at localhost i386]# grep 'SHELL_LOGIN' `rpm -ql wdm` /etc/wdm/Xclients.in:#!@SHELL_LOGIN@ ---------------------------------------------------- For packaging issue (not checked in detail) A. From http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines : * Timestamps - For install, use 'install -p'. - Please try to keep timestamps on image files under /usr/share/pixmaps/wdm . B. Other notes: * /etc/pam.d/wdm - This includes ------------------------------------------- account include system-auth ------------------------------------------- For this pam setting, I usually recommend 'Requires: pam >= 0.80'. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 29 16:53:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2006 11:53:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 174883] Review Request: distcc -- A free distributed C/C++ compiler system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611291653.kATGrL9c010603@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: distcc -- A free distributed C/C++ compiler system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174883 laurent.rineau__fedora_extras at normalesup.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|tsanders at redhat.com |nobody at fedoraproject.org OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163776 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From laurent.rineau__fedora_extras at normalesup.org 2006-11-29 11:53 EST ------- It seems that nobody is reviewing this bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 29 17:22:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2006 12:22:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216517] Review Request: gnome-valgrind-session - Run an entire GNOME session under valgrind In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611291722.kATHMJQd014220@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-valgrind-session - Run an entire GNOME session under valgrind https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216517 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-11-29 12:22 EST ------- ping -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 29 17:36:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2006 12:36:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216723] Review Request: libsieve - A library for parsing, sorting and filtering your mail In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611291736.kATHaiTX015547@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libsieve - A library for parsing, sorting and filtering your mail https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216723 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|panemade at gmail.com |nobody at fedoraproject.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 29 17:59:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2006 12:59:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217735] New: Review Request: tcldict - Tcl dictionary extensiuon Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217735 Summary: Review Request: tcldict - Tcl dictionary extensiuon Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: wart at kobold.org QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.kobold.org/~wart/fedora/tcldict.spec SRPM URL: http://www.kobold.org/~wart/fedora/tcldict-8.5.1-1.src.rpm Description: The 'dict' command from Tcl 8.5, backported to Tcl 8.4. Once Tcl is upgraded to 8.5 in Rawhide, it should Obsoletes: this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 29 17:59:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2006 12:59:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 190189] Review Request: PyQt4: Python bindings for Qt4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611291759.kATHxpa4017221@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PyQt4: Python bindings for Qt4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190189 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-11-29 12:59 EST ------- Yay, sip-4.5 will also be landing on FC-5/FC-6 soon too (currently in updates-testing), see bug #208847 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 29 18:09:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2006 13:09:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 211433] Review Request: wdm - WINGs Display Manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611291809.kATI9tn3017907@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wdm - WINGs Display Manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211433 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-11-29 13:09 EST ------- (In reply to comment #10) > are these files which rpmlint complains as > 'executable-marked-as-config-file' are 'configuration' files? > I feel like that configuration for wdm should done by somewhat > other files if these files should be customizable. In fact they may be in other place than /etc since the script location is set in /etc/wdm/wdm-config. However it could be possible for a sysadm to want to modify them to do special things at login or logout. They are clearly not suitable for %_bindir, but maybe some below /usr/share/, others in %docs. I removed the noreplace flag for the scripts and examples not used in the default case. Now rpmlint is even more verbose. It wouldn't be possible to shut down rpmlint completly with files in /etc, since there would still be W: xorg-x11-xdm non-conffile-in-etc /etc/X11/xdm/Xaccess I don't have a clear idea on what would be the best packaging, but in any case this should be also discussed with xorg-x11-xdm/gdm/kdm > Umm, does /usr/bin/wdmReconfig correctly fix "@SHELL_LOGIN@" > in /etc/wdm/Xclients.in? No, there is a bug in wdmReconf, patched now. > - For install, use 'install -p'. > - Please try to keep timestamps on image files under > /usr/share/pixmaps/wdm . hopefully fixed. > B. Other notes: > * /etc/pam.d/wdm > - This includes > ------------------------------------------- > account include system-auth > ------------------------------------------- > For this pam setting, I usually recommend > 'Requires: pam >= 0.80'. Done, thanks. http://www.environnement.ens.fr/perso/dumas/fc-srpms/wdm-1.28-6.src.rpm - fix reconfiguration script - requires pam recent enough - don't set noreplace for scripts and example config files -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 29 18:26:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2006 13:26:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217366] Review Request: libnl - netlink sockets support/manipulation library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611291826.kATIQ8Lh019101@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libnl - netlink sockets support/manipulation library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217366 ------- Additional Comments From nhorman at redhat.com 2006-11-29 13:25 EST ------- new packages available: SPEC: http://people.redhat.com/nhorman/rpms/libnl.spec SRPM: http://people.redhat.com/nhorman/rpms/libnl-1.0-0.4.pre6.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 29 18:34:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2006 13:34:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217275] Review Request: ocsinventory-client - Open Computer and Software Inventory Next Generation client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611291834.kATIYTgT019801@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocsinventory-client - Open Computer and Software Inventory Next Generation client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217275 ------- Additional Comments From Fedora at FamilleCollet.com 2006-11-29 13:34 EST ------- Spec URL: http://remi.collet.free.fr/rpms/extras/ocsinventory-client.spec SRPM URL: http://remi.collet.free.fr/rpms/extras/ocsinventory-client-1.0-0.5.RC3.fc7.src.rpm %changelog * Wed Nov 29 2006 Remi Collet 1.0-0.5.RC3 - Requires %%{_sysconfdir}/logrotate.d and %%{_sysconfdir}/cron.daily - define perl_vendorlib on non-fedora (for RHEL3) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 29 19:36:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2006 14:36:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217603] Review Request: tachyon - Parallel / Multiprocessor Ray Tracing System In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611291936.kATJavtV026240@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tachyon - Parallel / Multiprocessor Ray Tracing System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217603 ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2006-11-29 14:36 EST ------- http://rpm.greysector.net/extras/tachyon.spec http://rpm.greysector.net/extras/tachyon-0.97-2.src.rpm - use only kosher CFLAGS - fix target macro setting -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 29 19:47:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2006 14:47:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213594] Review Request: eclipse-phpeclipse In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611291947.kATJlN5m027745@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-phpeclipse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213594 ------- Additional Comments From bkonrath at redhat.com 2006-11-29 14:47 EST ------- You need -Dosgi.sharedConfiguration.area=%{_libdir}/eclipse/configuration for rawhide because we changed the packages to be multilib compatible. We are putting out an update to fc6 with this change as well. I'll report back when the updated packages have been pushed. Sorry for not mentioning this in the last post. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 29 20:31:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2006 15:31:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 211728] Review Request: stklos - Scheme Interpreter/Compiler System In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611292031.kATKVXmr031198@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: stklos - Scheme Interpreter/Compiler System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211728 ------- Additional Comments From gemi at bluewin.ch 2006-11-29 15:31 EST ------- (In reply to comment #14) > Is the upstream developer planning to support GTK2 soon? This looks really > interesting. It seems that the author considers it, but apparently is low priority. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 29 21:15:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2006 16:15:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 208396] Review Request: v4l2-tool - Tool to get webcam usage Information In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611292115.kATLFEij003496@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: v4l2-tool - Tool to get webcam usage Information https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208396 ------- Additional Comments From michel.salim at gmail.com 2006-11-29 16:15 EST ------- Need fixing: - rpmlint on SRPM: W: v4l2-tool mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 10, tab: line 1) - v4l2-tool.png included twice (in /usr/share/pixmaps and /usr/share/pixmaps/v4l2-tool). I think one of them is meant to be v4l2-tool-logo.png, which is not packaged - dl.sourceforge.net has been refusing connections for some time. Change URL to use one of the download mirrors? - License file (COPYING) needs to be included in %docs - %description incorrect (says it's digiKam-doc) - desktop file's Categories should probably include HardwareSettings (and perhaps Utility) and should not include Player. Not sure if the Audio category is necessary - I think of a webcam as primarily a video device. Good: - Source matches upstream - License OK - Spec readable, language OK The Icon= line in the desktop file does not need to specify an extension, by the way. Most desktop files omit this (perhaps to make a switch to SVG easier) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 29 21:37:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2006 16:37:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 211728] Review Request: stklos - Scheme Interpreter/Compiler System In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611292137.kATLbD2i005735@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: stklos - Scheme Interpreter/Compiler System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211728 ------- Additional Comments From michel.salim at gmail.com 2006-11-29 16:37 EST ------- The build scripts are not 64-bit clean - on my 64-bit machine it was using /usr/lib instead of /usr/lib64, despite the --libdir flag passed in %configure. Some build-script patching might be required. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 29 22:09:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2006 17:09:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217275] Review Request: ocsinventory-client - Open Computer and Software Inventory Next Generation client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611292209.kATM9AO8010022@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocsinventory-client - Open Computer and Software Inventory Next Generation client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217275 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |pertusus at free.fr OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-11-29 17:09 EST ------- * rpmlint gives an ignorable warning, % in post is used in date invocation: W: ocsinventory-client percent-in-%post * the tarball name cannot be used, the name chosen is relevant, and used in other distros. * free software, license included * follow packaging guidelines * source match upstream: 34edd057f1937245d06c3515c0ff50ad OCSNG_LINUX_AGENT_1.0RC3.tar.gz * sane provides: Provides: config(ocsinventory-client) = 1.0-0.5.RC3 perl(Ocsinventory::Agent) perl(Ocsinventory::Agent::Common) perl(Ocsinventory::Agent::Option::Download) perl(Ocsinventory::Agent::Option::Ipdiscover) perl(Ocsinventory::Agent::Option::Update) * buildrequires right * %files section right APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 29 22:32:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2006 17:32:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217256] Review Request: alsa-tools - Specialist tools for ALSA In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611292232.kATMWHh3012720@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: alsa-tools - Specialist tools for ALSA https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217256 ------- Additional Comments From rpm at timj.co.uk 2006-11-29 17:32 EST ------- I imported and tried to build on devel but it failed with an odd error on ppc: http://buildsys.fedoraproject.org/logs/fedora-development-extras/22627-alsa-tools-1.0.12-3.fc7/ppc/build.log (for some reason it didn't appear to even try to build on other archs, which is weird). Will have to look at this in more detail. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 29 22:39:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2006 17:39:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217603] Review Request: tachyon - Parallel / Multiprocessor Ray Tracing System In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611292239.kATMdaUC013509@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tachyon - Parallel / Multiprocessor Ray Tracing System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217603 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 29 23:08:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2006 18:08:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217806] New: Review Request: tktreectrl - flexible listbox widget for Tk Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217806 Summary: Review Request: tktreectrl - flexible listbox widget for Tk Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: wart at kobold.org QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.kobold.org/~wart/fedora/tktreectrl.spec SRPM URL: http://www.kobold.org/~wart/fedora/tktreectrl-2.2-1.src.rpm Description: Flexible listbox widget for Tk -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 29 23:12:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2006 18:12:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217807] New: Review Request: perl-Gtk2-Ex-Utils - Extra Gtk2 Utilities for working with Gnome2/Gtk2 in Perl Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217807 Summary: Review Request: perl-Gtk2-Ex-Utils - Extra Gtk2 Utilities for working with Gnome2/Gtk2 in Perl Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Gtk2-Ex-Utils/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com SRPM URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-Gtk2-Ex-Utils-0.09-1.fc6.src.rpm SPEC URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-Gtk2-Ex-Utils.spec Description: This module provides simple utility functions useful for Gnome2/Gtk2 Perl programming. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 29 23:13:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2006 18:13:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217807] Review Request: perl-Gtk2-Ex-Utils - Extra Gtk2 Utilities for working with Gnome2/Gtk2 in Perl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611292313.kATND0p4017454@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Gtk2-Ex-Utils - Extra Gtk2 Utilities for working with Gnome2/Gtk2 in Perl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217807 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |163776 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 30 00:47:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2006 19:47:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217810] New: Review Request: perl-Gtk2-Ex-Dialogs - Useful tools for Gnome2/Gtk2 Perl GUI design Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217810 Summary: Review Request: perl-Gtk2-Ex-Dialogs - Useful tools for Gnome2/Gtk2 Perl GUI design Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Gtk2-Ex-Dialogs/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com SRPM URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-Gtk2-Ex-Dialogs-0.11-1.fc6.src.rpm SPEC URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-Gtk2-Ex-Dialogs.spec Description: This module provides a clean, simple, quick api to generate and use common Gtk2 dialogs, either from within a full-blown Gtk2 app or as a one-off deal inside a non-Gtk2 perl application. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 30 00:47:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2006 19:47:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217810] Review Request: perl-Gtk2-Ex-Dialogs - Useful tools for Gnome2/Gtk2 Perl GUI design In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611300047.kAU0lgW8022620@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Gtk2-Ex-Dialogs - Useful tools for Gnome2/Gtk2 Perl GUI design https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217810 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |217807 OtherBugsDependingO| |163776 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 30 00:47:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2006 19:47:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217807] Review Request: perl-Gtk2-Ex-Utils - Extra Gtk2 Utilities for working with Gnome2/Gtk2 in Perl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611300047.kAU0lh00022624@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Gtk2-Ex-Utils - Extra Gtk2 Utilities for working with Gnome2/Gtk2 in Perl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217807 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |217810 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 30 01:43:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2006 20:43:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217807] Review Request: perl-Gtk2-Ex-Utils - Extra Gtk2 Utilities for working with Gnome2/Gtk2 in Perl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611300143.kAU1hxOL024426@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Gtk2-Ex-Utils - Extra Gtk2 Utilities for working with Gnome2/Gtk2 in Perl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217807 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-11-29 20:43 EST ------- taking this for review -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 30 01:47:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2006 20:47:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217810] Review Request: perl-Gtk2-Ex-Dialogs - Useful tools for Gnome2/Gtk2 Perl GUI design In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611300147.kAU1l1od024518@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Gtk2-Ex-Dialogs - Useful tools for Gnome2/Gtk2 Perl GUI design https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217810 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-11-29 20:47 EST ------- taking this package for review -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 30 01:48:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2006 20:48:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217807] Review Request: perl-Gtk2-Ex-Utils - Extra Gtk2 Utilities for working with Gnome2/Gtk2 in Perl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611300148.kAU1mfrH024652@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Gtk2-Ex-Utils - Extra Gtk2 Utilities for working with Gnome2/Gtk2 in Perl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217807 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 30 03:45:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2006 22:45:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 174377] Review Request: gnu-smalltalk - GNU Smalltalk In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611300345.kAU3jqt7030852@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnu-smalltalk - GNU Smalltalk https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174377 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-11-29 22:45 EST ------- Well, ------------------------------------------------------- E: gnu-smalltalk non-executable-script /usr/share/gnu-smalltalk/vfs/uar 0644 E: gnu-smalltalk non-executable-script /usr/share/gnu-smalltalk/examples/shell 0644 E: gnu-smalltalk non-executable-script /usr/share/gnu-smalltalk/vfs/mailfs 0644 E: gnu-smalltalk wrong-script-interpreter /usr/share/gnu-smalltalk/Test.st "@bindir@/gst" E: gnu-smalltalk non-executable-script /usr/share/gnu-smalltalk/Test.st 0644 E: gnu-smalltalk non-executable-script /usr/share/gnu-smalltalk/examples/pepe.sed 0644 E: gnu-smalltalk non-executable-script /usr/share/gnu-smalltalk/vfs/uzip 0644 E: gnu-smalltalk non-executable-script /usr/share/gnu-smalltalk/vfs/utar 0644 E: gnu-smalltalk non-executable-script /usr/share/gnu-smalltalk/vfs/urar 0644 E: gnu-smalltalk wrong-script-interpreter /usr/share/gnu-smalltalk/Load.st "@bindir@/gst" E: gnu-smalltalk non-executable-script /usr/share/gnu-smalltalk/Load.st 0644 W: gnu-smalltalk devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/gnu-smalltalk/unsupported/binary.c E: gnu-smalltalk wrong-script-interpreter /usr/share/gnu-smalltalk/Reload.st "@bindir@/gst" E: gnu-smalltalk non-executable-script /usr/share/gnu-smalltalk/Reload.st 0644 E: gnu-smalltalk non-executable-script /usr/share/gnu-smalltalk/vfs/patchfs 0644 E: gnu-smalltalk non-executable-script /usr/share/gnu-smalltalk/vfs/deb 0644 E: gnu-smalltalk non-executable-script /usr/share/gnu-smalltalk/vfs/ucpio 0644 E: gnu-smalltalk non-executable-script /usr/share/gnu-smalltalk/examples/xml.sed 0644 E: gnu-smalltalk non-executable-script /usr/share/gnu-smalltalk/vfs/uzoo 0644 E: gnu-smalltalk non-executable-script /usr/share/gnu-smalltalk/vfs/lslR 0644 E: gnu-smalltalk non-executable-script /usr/share/gnu-smalltalk/vfs/ulha 0644 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- * _Permission_ fix is necessary (and permission fix won't change _timestamp_) ----------------------------------------------------------------- rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/{_datadir}/gnu-smalltalk/Load.st ----------------------------------------------------------------- should be: ----------------------------------------------------------------- rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_datadir}/gnu-smalltalk/Load.st ----------------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 30 04:18:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2006 23:18:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217603] Review Request: tachyon - Parallel / Multiprocessor Ray Tracing System In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611300418.kAU4ISeO002091@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tachyon - Parallel / Multiprocessor Ray Tracing System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217603 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-11-29 23:18 EST ------- This packages meets : http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines Okay. -------------------------------------------------- This package (tachyon) is APPROVED by me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 30 04:52:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2006 23:52:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 208420] Review Request: conky - A system monitor for X originally based on the torsmo code In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611300452.kAU4q5Vu006904@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: conky - A system monitor for X originally based on the torsmo code https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208420 ------- Additional Comments From miker5slow at grandecom.net 2006-11-29 23:52 EST ------- http://errr.fluxbox-wiki.org/fedora_stuff/conky/conky-1.4.4-1.src.rpm http://errr.fluxbox-wiki.org/fedora_stuff/conky/conky.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 30 06:04:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2006 01:04:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 174377] Review Request: gnu-smalltalk - GNU Smalltalk In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611300604.kAU64FRX010884@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnu-smalltalk - GNU Smalltalk https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174377 ------- Additional Comments From bonzini at gnu.org 2006-11-30 01:04 EST ------- > E: gnu-smalltalk non-executable-script /usr/share/gnu-smalltalk/vfs/uar 0644 I fixed this upstream. Jochen, you may want to wait for the final 2.3 release at this point. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 30 06:21:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2006 01:21:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217807] Review Request: perl-Gtk2-Ex-Utils - Extra Gtk2 Utilities for working with Gnome2/Gtk2 in Perl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611300621.kAU6LkrS011360@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Gtk2-Ex-Utils - Extra Gtk2 Utilities for working with Gnome2/Gtk2 in Perl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217807 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-11-30 01:21 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and RPMS. + source files match upstream. 076bb6914470fb077f7028fef0a795f8 Gtk2-Ex-Utils-0.09.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. License text included in package. + %doc is small; no -doc subpackage required. + %doc does not affect runtime. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage exists + no .la files. + no translations are available + Dose owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + Followed perl packaging guidelines. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 30 06:28:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2006 01:28:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 210287] Review Request: Qt# - A set of qt bindings for mono In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611300628.kAU6Sx8T011639@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Qt# - A set of qt bindings for mono https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210287 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-11-30 01:28 EST ------- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 30 06:39:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2006 01:39:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217810] Review Request: perl-Gtk2-Ex-Dialogs - Useful tools for Gnome2/Gtk2 Perl GUI design In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611300639.kAU6d9Mm012016@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Gtk2-Ex-Dialogs - Useful tools for Gnome2/Gtk2 Perl GUI design https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217810 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-11-30 01:39 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and RPMS. + source files match upstream. 1ad86e1b3088971835a9393c710dbbfc Gtk2-Ex-Dialogs-0.11.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. License text included in package. + %doc is small; no -doc subpackage required. + %doc does not affect runtime. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage exists + no .la files. + no translations are available + Dose owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + Followed perl packaging guidelines. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 30 06:41:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2006 01:41:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217366] Review Request: libnl - netlink sockets support/manipulation library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611300641.kAU6ffL2012109@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libnl - netlink sockets support/manipulation library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217366 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-11-30 01:41 EST ------- Thanks. Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and RPMS. + source files match upstream. 0f57cb7085dc27e054691bff858613c9 libnl-1.0-pre6.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. License text included in package. + %doc is small; no -doc subpackage required. + %doc does not affect runtime. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + libnl-1.pc file present. + -devel subpackage exists + included %post -p /sbin/ldconfig %postun -p /sbin/ldconfig + no .la files. + no translations are available + Dose owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 30 06:45:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2006 01:45:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217557] Review Request: keurocalc - KEuroCalc is a universal currency converter and calculator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611300645.kAU6jXbV012211@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: keurocalc - KEuroCalc is a universal currency converter and calculator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217557 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-11-30 01:45 EST ------- Looks like its not possible. APPROVED. Don't forget to close this bug as NEXTRELEASE. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 30 06:47:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2006 01:47:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 211433] Review Request: wdm - WINGs Display Manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611300647.kAU6lTZw012300@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wdm - WINGs Display Manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211433 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-11-30 01:47 EST ------- Umm... we cannot avoid rpmlint complaints... I leave them as they are. Then a few issues are left. * 'install -m755' or 'install -m644' Please use 'install -p -m755' or so. * A question: What does disabling --enable-aafont option mean? Doesn't it work well (I have not checked this)? Other things are okay. Well, actually this is a right and nice display manager. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 30 06:49:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2006 01:49:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217807] Review Request: perl-Gtk2-Ex-Utils - Extra Gtk2 Utilities for working with Gnome2/Gtk2 in Perl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611300649.kAU6nYM0012360@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Gtk2-Ex-Utils - Extra Gtk2 Utilities for working with Gnome2/Gtk2 in Perl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217807 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-11-30 01:49 EST ------- Imported and building for devel; branches requested for FC-[56]. Thanks for the review! :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 30 06:49:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2006 01:49:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217810] Review Request: perl-Gtk2-Ex-Dialogs - Useful tools for Gnome2/Gtk2 Perl GUI design In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611300649.kAU6nur8012384@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Gtk2-Ex-Dialogs - Useful tools for Gnome2/Gtk2 Perl GUI design https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217810 Bug 217810 depends on bug 217807, which changed state. Bug 217807 Summary: Review Request: perl-Gtk2-Ex-Utils - Extra Gtk2 Utilities for working with Gnome2/Gtk2 in Perl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217807 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 30 06:57:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2006 01:57:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217810] Review Request: perl-Gtk2-Ex-Dialogs - Useful tools for Gnome2/Gtk2 Perl GUI design In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611300657.kAU6vwSZ012609@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Gtk2-Ex-Dialogs - Useful tools for Gnome2/Gtk2 Perl GUI design https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217810 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-11-30 01:57 EST ------- Imported and building for devel; branching for FC-[56] requested. Thanks for the review! :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 30 09:22:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2006 04:22:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217256] Review Request: alsa-tools - Specialist tools for ALSA In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611300922.kAU9MsGR019050@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: alsa-tools - Specialist tools for ALSA https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217256 ------- Additional Comments From rpm at timj.co.uk 2006-11-30 04:22 EST ------- Hmm, it's not building on FC6 either, on PPC. See job 22645 Anyone have a PPC machine that they can play around on? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 30 10:13:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2006 05:13:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217836] New: Review Request: vimoutliner - set of vim macros for editing outlines Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217836 Summary: Review Request: vimoutliner - set of vim macros for editing outlines Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mcepl at redhat.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.ceplovi.cz/matej/progs/rpms/vimoutliner.spec SRPM URL: http://www.ceplovi.cz/matej/progs/rpms/vimoutliner-0.3.4-4.src.rpm Description: Vimoutliner provides commands for building using the Vim text editor as an outline editor. For more explanation on what outlines are and what they are good for see the script's webpage at http://www.vimoutliner.org and the general discussion of outlines on http://www.troubleshooters.com/tpromag/199911/199911.htm. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 30 10:13:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2006 05:13:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 211728] Review Request: stklos - Scheme Interpreter/Compiler System In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611301013.kAUADTgX022144@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: stklos - Scheme Interpreter/Compiler System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211728 ------- Additional Comments From gemi at bluewin.ch 2006-11-30 05:13 EST ------- This should fix the 64-bit libdir: http://math.ifi.unizh.ch/fedora/6/i386/SRPMS.gemi/stklos-0.81-1.fc6.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 30 10:15:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2006 05:15:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217836] Review Request: vimoutliner - set of vim macros for editing outlines In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611301015.kAUAFjfG022376@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vimoutliner - set of vim macros for editing outlines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217836 ------- Additional Comments From mcepl at redhat.com 2006-11-30 05:15 EST ------- And yes this is one of the first packages I made for Fedora and the first one which I try to push into Extras. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 30 10:19:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2006 05:19:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217836] Review Request: vimoutliner - set of vim macros for editing outlines In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611301019.kAUAJY7k022658@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vimoutliner - set of vim macros for editing outlines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217836 mcepl at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 30 10:21:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2006 05:21:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217836] Review Request: vimoutliner - set of vim macros for editing outlines In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611301021.kAUALCB6022836@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vimoutliner - set of vim macros for editing outlines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217836 mcepl at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |163776 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 30 10:26:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2006 05:26:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 208420] Review Request: conky - A system monitor for X originally based on the torsmo code In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611301026.kAUAQcs2023179@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: conky - A system monitor for X originally based on the torsmo code https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208420 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-11-30 05:26 EST ------- comment #13 is still relevant for buildrequires and additional docs. I think that you shouldn't put the vim and nano files in %_datadir, but simply use: %doc extras/* -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 30 10:41:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2006 05:41:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 211433] Review Request: wdm - WINGs Display Manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611301041.kAUAfIwc024872@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wdm - WINGs Display Manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211433 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-11-30 05:41 EST ------- (In reply to comment #12) > Then a few issues are left. > * 'install -m755' or 'install -m644' > Please use 'install -p -m755' or so. Done. > * A question: > What does disabling --enable-aafont option mean? Doesn't it work > well (I have not checked this)? I tried to follow what's in README.aa, but I didn't see anything happening. I may have missed something. I enabled the option anyway. http://www.environnement.ens.fr/perso/dumas/fc-srpms/wdm-1.28-7.src.rpm - keep timestamps for shipped files - enable aa fonts -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 30 11:33:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2006 06:33:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 211728] Review Request: stklos - Scheme Interpreter/Compiler System In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611301133.kAUBXSWR028382@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: stklos - Scheme Interpreter/Compiler System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211728 rpm at greysector.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rpm at greysector.net ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2006-11-30 06:33 EST ------- Redundant BuildRequires: gtk+-devel (required by gdk-pixbuf-devel). Is it really worth to enable ldap support? extensions/README says: ** ldap This is a proof of concept module. Don't take it as a finished extension. This is a module that I have written because I need to hack a rather large LDAP base in our school. It does what I need and very little more. If you want to improve it to make something more useful, I would be glad to add your contribution. Builds fine out of mock. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 30 12:37:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2006 07:37:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217603] Review Request: tachyon - Parallel / Multiprocessor Ray Tracing System In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611301237.kAUCbY9K031427@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tachyon - Parallel / Multiprocessor Ray Tracing System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217603 rpm at greysector.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2006-11-30 07:37 EST ------- Imported and built for devel, FC-5 and FC-6 branches requested. Thanks for the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 30 12:43:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2006 07:43:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 211433] Review Request: wdm - WINGs Display Manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611301243.kAUChJDT031787@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wdm - WINGs Display Manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211433 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-11-30 07:43 EST ------- (In reply to comment #13) > I tried to follow what's in README.aa, but I didn't see anything > happening. I may have missed something. I enabled the option > anyway. Well, I have not yet checked the effect of AAFONT, however it might do something... Anyway 1.28-7 works well for me. --------------------------------------------------------------- This package (wdm) is APPROVED by me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 30 12:47:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2006 07:47:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 208396] Review Request: v4l2-tool - Tool to get webcam usage Information In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611301247.kAUClPu1032155@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: v4l2-tool - Tool to get webcam usage Information https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208396 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-11-30 07:47 EST ------- Updated links Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/pnemade/v4l2-tool/v4l2-tool.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/pnemade/v4l2-tool/v4l2-tool-1.0.2-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 30 14:15:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2006 09:15:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217366] Review Request: libnl - netlink sockets support/manipulation library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611301415.kAUEFg0m006948@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libnl - netlink sockets support/manipulation library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217366 ------- Additional Comments From nhorman at redhat.com 2006-11-30 09:15 EST ------- cool, thanks! I'm trying to import the srpm to cvs, accoording to: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/Contributors Unfortunately libnl doesn't exist as a directory in CVS yet, and the cvs-import script, while it can add lbnl to the modules file, can't seem to create it in the CVS tree, as the documentation indicates that it should. Any thoughts as to whats going on? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 30 14:21:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2006 09:21:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 203288] Review Request: devilspie In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611301421.kAUELpOB007693@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: devilspie https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203288 fedora at deadbabylon.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|NOTABUG | Status|CLOSED |NEW Keywords| |Reopened ------- Additional Comments From fedora at deadbabylon.de 2006-11-30 09:21 EST ------- Repoening because Christoph Wickert has offered sponsorship Also updated to new version 0.18: SPEC: http://www.deadbabylon.de/fedora/extras/devilspie/devilspie.spec SRPM: http://www.deadbabylon.de/fedora/extras/devilspie/devilspie-0.18-1.fc6.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 30 14:23:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2006 09:23:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 203288] Review Request: devilspie In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611301423.kAUEN5BA007870@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: devilspie https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203288 fedora at deadbabylon.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|bdpepple at ameritech.net |fedora at christoph-wickert.de OtherBugsDependingO|201449 |163778, 177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 30 14:28:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2006 09:28:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 203288] Review Request: devilspie In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611301428.kAUES968008408@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: devilspie https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203288 fedora at christoph-wickert.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 30 14:50:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2006 09:50:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217366] Review Request: libnl - netlink sockets support/manipulation library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611301450.kAUEoGUa011405@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libnl - netlink sockets support/manipulation library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217366 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-11-30 09:50 EST ------- So tell me which is your last step that failing from http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/Contributors ? Also you will get good information at #fedora-extras or in case having some problem to your account ask at #fedora-admin -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 30 14:54:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2006 09:54:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 199592] Review Request: icu4j In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611301454.kAUEsJ1c011991@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: icu4j https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199592 bkonrath at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|NOTABUG | Status|CLOSED |NEW Keywords| |Reopened ------- Additional Comments From bkonrath at redhat.com 2006-11-30 09:53 EST ------- We're going move the icu4j plugins build out of the eclipse package and put it in the icu4j package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 30 14:55:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2006 09:55:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217256] Review Request: alsa-tools - Specialist tools for ALSA In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611301455.kAUEtOY7012126@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: alsa-tools - Specialist tools for ALSA https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217256 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-11-30 09:55 EST ------- You can ask on FE-list about your build problem. Also you will get good information at #fedora-extras -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 30 14:56:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2006 09:56:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217366] Review Request: libnl - netlink sockets support/manipulation library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611301456.kAUEupvo012270@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libnl - netlink sockets support/manipulation library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217366 ------- Additional Comments From nhorman at redhat.com 2006-11-30 09:56 EST ------- Its all working great until I run the cvs-import script. The script successfully checks out the modules file, adds libnl to the end of it, and checks it back in. Then it goes to check out the libnl module, but the module doesn't exist in the CVS tree: cvs -d :ext:nhorman at cvs.fedora.redhat.com:/cvs/extras -Q checkout libnl Enter passphrase for key '/home/nhorman/.ssh/id_dsa': cvs [checkout aborted]: there is no repository /cvs/extras/rpms/libnl Any thoughts would be greatly appreciated. I'll ask on #fedora-extras. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 30 14:58:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2006 09:58:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 199592] Review Request: icu4j In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611301458.kAUEwubG012515@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: icu4j https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199592 bkonrath at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jjohnstn at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From bkonrath at redhat.com 2006-11-30 09:58 EST ------- Jeff, once you add the icu4j plugin build to the icu4j package, you'll need to get it into Fedora Core. But since the Core/Extras distinction is going away, I guess you can get it approved in either place. You should do this before FC7Test1. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 30 15:25:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2006 10:25:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217366] Review Request: libnl - netlink sockets support/manipulation library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611301525.kAUFPtOu015072@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libnl - netlink sockets support/manipulation library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217366 ------- Additional Comments From nhorman at redhat.com 2006-11-30 10:25 EST ------- found the problem. Appears we have a bug in the import script. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 30 15:56:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2006 10:56:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217366] Review Request: libnl - netlink sockets support/manipulation library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611301556.kAUFuvsf018689@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libnl - netlink sockets support/manipulation library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217366 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-11-30 10:56 EST ------- Gr8. So you had a good hacking experience on cvs-import.sh then manages to fix cvs co also. Go ahead and file a bug against script owner. So it did helped from #fedora-extras :) Now once its built you can CLOSE this bug as NEXTRELEASE resolution. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 30 16:03:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2006 11:03:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217366] Review Request: libnl - netlink sockets support/manipulation library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611301603.kAUG3k6b019370@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libnl - netlink sockets support/manipulation library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217366 nhorman at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From nhorman at redhat.com 2006-11-30 11:03 EST ------- done. bug 217875 is open for the cvs-import issue, and libnl is building for fc7 now. Thanks for all your help! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 30 16:18:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2006 11:18:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217366] Review Request: libnl - netlink sockets support/manipulation library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611301618.kAUGIFEK021054@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libnl - netlink sockets support/manipulation library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217366 ------- Additional Comments From jeff at ocjtech.us 2006-11-30 11:18 EST ------- I just realized - libnl is already in core - it's a dependency of NetworkManager, among other things... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 30 16:41:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2006 11:41:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217366] Review Request: libnl - netlink sockets support/manipulation library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611301641.kAUGfKHo023251@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libnl - netlink sockets support/manipulation library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217366 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-11-30 11:41 EST ------- If you had looked Core contains libnl-1.0-0.10.pre5.4.i386.rpm whereas extras contain libnl-1.0-0.4.pre6.i386.rpm which is newer More explanation can be given here by package owner. And i don't think they can conflicts each other but extras package can replace Core package in future. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 30 17:02:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2006 12:02:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217366] Review Request: libnl - netlink sockets support/manipulation library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611301702.kAUH2NWr025671@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libnl - netlink sockets support/manipulation library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217366 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-11-30 12:02 EST ------- oops they are really conflicting because of Core's libnl is dependency of NetworkManager. Its My Bad. Neil and Jeffrey, Sorry for not checking before about conflicting issue. I will take care from next time while reviewing packages. But i think i took enough time to review this package except should not have forgot to check package's existence and its confliction to other packages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 30 17:53:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2006 12:53:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 211433] Review Request: wdm - WINGs Display Manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611301753.kAUHr8Di029448@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wdm - WINGs Display Manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211433 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-11-30 12:52 EST ------- built in devel, owners.list updated, FC-6 branch asked. Thanks for the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 30 18:40:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2006 13:40:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 197867] Review Request: iscsitarget (includes kernel module) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611301840.kAUIeBWG001281@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: iscsitarget (includes kernel module) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197867 i.pilcher at comcast.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(i.pilcher at comcast.| |net) | ------- Additional Comments From i.pilcher at comcast.net 2006-11-30 13:40 EST ------- SRPMS are now at: http://home.comcast.net/~i.pilcher/iscsitarget-0.4.13-0.src.rpm http://home.comcast.net/~i.pilcher/iscsitarget-kmod-0.4.13-0.2.6.18_1.2849.fc6.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 30 19:31:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2006 14:31:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 204700] Review Request: njb-sharp - C# bindings to libnjb In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611301931.kAUJVKOO005992@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: njb-sharp - C# bindings to libnjb https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204700 triad at df.lth.se changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From triad at df.lth.se 2006-11-30 14:31 EST ------- Package does not build under x86_64 on FC-5, FC-6, devel unproblematic. Ithink we will simply dump FC-5 support or wait until its mono gets in sync with FC-6 & devel, so closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 30 20:05:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2006 15:05:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 202901] Review Request: pgFouine - PostgreSQL log analyzer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611302005.kAUK5hix008753@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pgFouine - PostgreSQL log analyzer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202901 ------- Additional Comments From toshio at tiki-lounge.com 2006-11-30 15:05 EST ------- 79df9b088a9cd0a7741de0b5857dc3e7 pgfouine-0.7.1.tar.gz 2dd8a37d014895ef2832b1cfef9916eb pgfouine.spec 6bbb6b68ecae95675af8725e2a400681 pgfouine-0.7-include_path.patch d2aba441696023bf0b6c65f8bda329a9 ../pgfouine-0.7.1-1.src.rpm All blockers have been resolved. The only thing I still find is that there is no document that tells how to set things up. Maybe including this file into documentation would be good: http://pgfouine.projects.postgresql.org/tutorial.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 30 20:25:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2006 15:25:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 211807] Review Request: firefox2 - Mozilla Firefox 2.0 Web browser for FC6 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611302025.kAUKPiZG010584@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: firefox2 - Mozilla Firefox 2.0 Web browser for FC6 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211807 ------- Additional Comments From nigde at mitechki.net 2006-11-30 15:25 EST ------- Just to report success. I have just built this from SRPM on my HP xw4100 box. Posting this from firefox 2. Works beautifully. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 30 20:45:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2006 15:45:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216734] Review Request: gnome-compiz-manager - compiz configuration utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611302045.kAUKjuiE013336@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-compiz-manager - compiz configuration utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216734 ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2006-11-30 15:45 EST ------- (In reply to comment #13) > (In reply to comment #12) > > giallu, > > I really not understanding whats happening at my end. I am using FC6 system > > with very less installed updates system. I tried to build on it using > > rpmbuild --rebuild gnome-compiz-manager-0.9.13.1-1.src.rpm > > and then installed all binary RPMS but still getting bug buddy appearing to > > report buglog. > > Exactly, which application is crashing ? it should be written in the opened bug > buddy window. I don't get it either. If you have the BuildRequires installed unmodified the result should be the same as what you get from mock. Unless it is some other run time problem on your system. You may want to report a bug: https://gna.org/bugs/?group=gcm > > > My compiz must be running while using this package right?? > > Not necessarily. AFAICT, you can use the included gnome try icon (or the > preferences) to activate desktop effects. > > However, I noticed some strange things: > 1. on first rpm install it said: gconfd-2: no process killed > 2. starting the desktop session is significantly slower than before 1. is a result of copying the gconf script directly from here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets I believe it is harmless. 2. There is a tray icon, though if it slows things down we may have a problem. Also if you changed compiz settings that may affect performance. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 30 20:59:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2006 15:59:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 212715] Review Request: openvrml - VRML/X3D runtime library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611302059.kAUKxv0u014814@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: openvrml - VRML/X3D runtime library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212715 ------- Additional Comments From Didier.Moens at dmbr.UGent.be 2006-11-30 15:59 EST ------- I realize STATUS=CLOSED, but for the sake of completeness : the problem originally reported in comment #21 is fixed in openvrml-mozilla-plugin-0.16.1-5.fc6. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 30 21:20:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2006 16:20:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 202901] Review Request: pgFouine - PostgreSQL log analyzer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611302120.kAULKKSi016588@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pgFouine - PostgreSQL log analyzer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202901 ------- Additional Comments From devrim at commandprompt.com 2006-11-30 16:20 EST ------- Hi, (In reply to comment #8) > All blockers have been resolved. Good :) > The only thing I still find is that there is no document that tells how to set > things up. Maybe including this file into documentation would be good: > > http://pgfouine.projects.postgresql.org/tutorial.html Ok, I added a text version of that document. The URLs for the new SRPM and SPEC file will follow. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 30 21:21:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2006 16:21:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 202901] Review Request: pgFouine - PostgreSQL log analyzer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611302121.kAULLXEa016673@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pgFouine - PostgreSQL log analyzer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202901 ------- Additional Comments From devrim at commandprompt.com 2006-11-30 16:21 EST ------- New spec: http://developer.postgresql.org/~devrim/rpms/other/pgfouine/pgfouine.spec New srpm: http://developer.postgresql.org/~devrim/rpms/other/pgfouine/pgfouine-0.7.1-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 30 22:13:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2006 17:13:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 202901] Review Request: pgFouine - PostgreSQL log analyzer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611302213.kAUMDCXp021984@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pgFouine - PostgreSQL log analyzer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202901 toshio at tiki-lounge.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From toshio at tiki-lounge.com 2006-11-30 17:12 EST ------- a2afd563b26c8271dc6e60290f35f3b7 pgfouine-0.7.1-2.src.rpm 6bbb6b68ecae95675af8725e2a400681 pgfouine-0.7.1-2/pgfouine-0.7-include_path.patch 79df9b088a9cd0a7741de0b5857dc3e7 pgfouine-0.7.1-2/pgfouine-0.7.1.tar.gz def5ab84558b24388322e21bd0abdc30 pgfouine-0.7.1-2/pgfouine-tutorial.txt 1b6867a7588b678bcae31258051d9f19 pgfouine-0.7.1-2/pgfouine.spec pgfouine.php was able to parse a small log file and generate reasonable output. No blockers. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 30 23:45:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2006 18:45:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 203288] Review Request: devilspie In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611302345.kAUNjtwJ027722@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: devilspie https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203288 fedora at christoph-wickert.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From fedora at christoph-wickert.de 2006-11-30 18:45 EST ------- Removing the Bug #177841 Tracker because I have already sponsored Sebastian. The package has not been reviewed yet, will do that tomorrow. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 30 23:54:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2006 18:54:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 202901] Review Request: pgFouine - PostgreSQL log analyzer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200611302354.kAUNsE75028242@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pgFouine - PostgreSQL log analyzer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202901 devrim at commandprompt.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.