[Bug 212079] Review Request: freefont - Free UCS Outline Fonts
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Wed Nov 1 06:34:35 UTC 2006
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: freefont - Free UCS Outline Fonts
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212079
panemade at gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779
nThis| |
------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-11-01 01:34 EST -------
Review:
+ package builds fine in mock (development i386).
+ rpmlint is silent for RPM and SRPM.
+ source files match upstream.
822aba4e2ed065d9d3ded6e26e495854 freefont-ttf-20060126.tar.gz
+ package meets naming and packaging guidelines.
+ specfile is properly named, is cleanly written
+ Spec file is written in American English.
+ Spec file is legible.
+ dist tag is present.
+ build root is correct.
+ license is open source-compatible. License text included in package.
+ %doc is small so -doc subpackage not required.
+ %doc does not affect runtime.
+ COPYING included in %doc.
+ BuildRequires are proper.
+ %clean is present.
+ package installed properly.
+ Macro use appears rather consistent.
+ Package contains code, not content.
+ no headers or static libraries.
+ no .pc files.
+ no -devel subpackage exists
+ no .la files.
+ no translations available
+ Provides: freefont-ttf = 20060126-3.fc6
+ Requires(post): /bin/sh
Requires(postun): /bin/sh
Requires: /usr/share/fonts
+ Obsoletes: freefont-ttf < 20060126-3.fc6
+ owns the directories it creates.
+ doesn't own any directories it shouldn't.
+ no duplicates in %files.
+ file permissions are appropriate.
+ scriptlets present and used according to its standards.
+ Not a GUI app
APPROVED.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
More information about the Fedora-package-review
mailing list