[Bug 214527] Review Request: perl-HTML-Table - Create HTML tables using simple interface

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: perl-HTML-Table - Create HTML tables using simple interface


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214527


kevin at tummy.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
         AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org    |kevin at tummy.com
OtherBugsDependingO|163776                      |163779
              nThis|                            |




------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com  2006-11-11 22:38 EST -------
OK - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines
OK - Spec file matches base package name.
OK - Spec has consistant macro usage.
OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines.
OK - License
OK - License field in spec matches
See below - License file included in package
OK - Spec in American English
OK - Spec is legible.
OK - Sources match upstream md5sum:
12c107450c8759e9dc0f8dea91297132  HTML-Table-2.04a.tar.gz
12c107450c8759e9dc0f8dea91297132  HTML-Table-2.04a.tar.gz.1
OK - BuildRequires correct
OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good.
OK - Package has a correct %clean section.
OK - Package has correct buildroot
OK - Package is code or permissible content.
OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime.

OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch.
OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files.
OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own.
OK - Package owns all the directories it creates.
OK - No rpmlint output.
OK - final provides and requires are sane:

SHOULD Items:

OK - Should build in mock.
OK i386/x86_64 - Should build on all supported archs
OK - Should have dist tag
OK - Should package latest version

Issues:

1. Any chance to get upstream to include a license file?
Thats not a blocker however, and thats the only issue I see...

this package is APPROVED.

Don't forget to close this bug NEXTRELEASE once it's been imported
and built.

Also, consider reviewing another package thats waiting to help
spread out the reviewing load.


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.