[Bug 214669] Review Request: logserial
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Sun Nov 12 04:29:47 UTC 2006
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: logserial
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214669
kevin at tummy.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |kevin at tummy.com
OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778
nThis| |
------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-11-11 23:29 EST -------
OK - Spec has consistant macro usage.
OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines.
OK - License (GPL)
OK - License field in spec matches
See below - License file included in package
OK - Spec in American English
OK - Spec is legible.
OK - Sources match upstream md5sum:
833fff07602e4a21f447aa194d14ecd8 logserial-0.4.2.tar.gz
833fff07602e4a21f447aa194d14ecd8 logserial-0.4.2.tar.gz.1
OK - BuildRequires correct
OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good.
OK - Package has a correct %clean section.
OK - Package has correct buildroot
OK - Package is code or permissible content.
OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime.
OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch.
OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files.
OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own.
OK - Package owns all the directories it creates.
OK - No rpmlint output.
OK - final provides and requires are sane:
SHOULD Items:
OK - Should build in mock.
x86_64/i386 - Should build on all supported archs
OK - Should have dist tag
OK - Should package latest version
Issues:
1. Given how long since the last upstream release of this package it seems
unlikely, but any chance of them including a COPYING file?
2. Instead of the flags you set in the logserial-makefile.patch
perhaps you could set $RPM_OPT_FLAGS instead?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
More information about the Fedora-package-review
mailing list