[Bug 212704] Review Request: manedit - UNIX Manual Page Editor

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: manedit - UNIX Manual Page Editor


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212704





------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com  2006-11-11 23:43 EST -------
Official Review:
+ package builds in mock (development i386) for FC6.
+ rpmlint is silent for RPM and SRPM.
+ source files match upstream.
229586101245eb61018ff031c2efb247  manedit-0.7.1.tar.bz2
+ package meets naming and packaging guidelines.
+ specfile is properly named, is cleanly written but NOT properly indented.
+ Spec file is written in American English.
+ Spec file is legible.
+ dist tag is present.
+ build root is correct.
+ license is open source-compatible.  License text included in package.
+ %doc is small; no -doc subpackage required.
+ %doc does not affect runtime.
+ COPYING included in %doc.
+ BuildRequires are proper.
+ %clean is present.
+ package installed properly.
+ Macro use appears rather consistent.
+ Package contains code, not content.
+ no headers or static libraries.
+ no .pc files.
+ no -devel subpackage exists
+ no .la files.
+ no translations are available.
+ owns the directories it creates.
+ doesn't own any directories it shouldn't.
+ no duplicates in %files.
+ file permissions are appropriate.
+ Desktop file installed successfully
+ Desktop file is handled correctly in SPEC file.
+ GUI application

Patrice,
    Need your suggestion whether this package can be approved with rendering
problem in manview? I think we can accept this package and let the rendering
problem be solved in next release.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.