[Bug 198098] Review Request: xarchiver

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: xarchiver


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198098


fedora at christoph-wickert.de changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |kevin at tummy.com
OtherBugsDependingO|                            |215241
              nThis|                            |




------- Additional Comments From fedora at christoph-wickert.de  2006-11-12 15:24 EST -------
I'd like to take over this package, since there has benn no feedback from Damien
for more then 4 months now and I really would like to see this package in Extras
soon. Could someone please review these files?

http://home.arcor.de/christoph.wickert/fedora/extras/review/SPECS/xarchiver.spec
http://home.arcor.de/christoph.wickert/fedora/extras/review/SRPMS/xarchiver-0.4.2-0.1.rc2.fc7.src.rpm

I have packaged xarchiver for a while now (I had not seen this review), but my
package looks quite different. I have split the package into xarchiver and
xarchiver-thunar-archive-plugin. The latter contains only one file
/usr/libexec/fedora-xarchiver.tap, a wrapper script for thunar-archive-plugin
(see bug #215241). I don't want xarchiver depend on Thunar.

Maybe it's easier to drop the sub-package, but then we'll have to include
fedora-xarchiver.tap in thunar-archive-plugin. Simply leaving it in the
xarchiver main package (without a dependency on the archive plugin) would lead
to an unowned /usr/libexec/thunar-archive-plugin/ if thunar(-archive-plugin) is
not installed. If the archive plugin is installed, this dir would be owned by
two packages. Bad Idea.

Opinions? Drop the sub-package and move the file over to thunar-archive-plugin? 

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.