[Bug 215571] Review Request: heliodor - Beryl window decorator with Metacity theme support

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: heliodor - Beryl window decorator with Metacity theme support


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215571


mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
OtherBugsDependingO|163778                      |163779
              nThis|                            |




------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp  2006-11-18 09:28 EST -------
Well, this time mockbuild for FC-devel i386 is okay.

* Requires: metacity, control-center
  - Not necessary as libraries' dependency automaticall pulls
    them.

? /usr/share/gnome/wm-properties/
  - This directory is not owned by any package, however, I don't
    know which package should own this.
    (This package requires metacity, so my thought is that this
     should be metacity, however, do you have any idea?)

    Currently, my system has the following files under
    /usr/share/gnome/wm-properties/:
------------------------------------------
beryl.desktop     (by heliodor-0.1.2-3.fc7)
compiz.desktop    (by compiz-0.3.2-2.fc7)
metacity.desktop  (by metacity-2.17.2-1.fc7)
------------------------------------------

? For license:
  - lib/beryl-window-manager.c seems to be "free" (not GPL however
  less strict than GPL)
  - src/main.c says this is LGPL (not GPL) (why?)
  - and there is a copy license that this is GPL.....

  Well, however, I trust the document license and I assume that
  this package is licensed under GPL for now.

Other things are okay.

-------------------------------------------------------
  This packag (beliodor) is APPROVED by me.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.