[Bug 190213] Review Request: gq - Graphical LDAP directory browser and editor

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: gq - Graphical LDAP directory browser and editor


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190213


fedora at christoph-wickert.de changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
OtherBugsDependingO|163778, 177841              |163779
              nThis|                            |




------- Additional Comments From fedora at christoph-wickert.de  2006-11-20 12:14 EST -------
(In reply to comment #20)
> > update-mime-database/shared-mime-info
> 
> I am able to don't get this to work, should it?

erm, no sorry, this was too much for rpm. Only takes one agrument and needs an
absolute path. Doesn't really matter.

> New files:
> SPEC:  http://www.pvv.org/~terjeros/rpms/gq/gq.spec
> SRPMS: http://www.pvv.org/~terjeros/rpms/gq/gq-1.2.2-2.fc6.src.rpm

The new package
998cd6dc0290925aef60d1786f96978f  gq-1.2.2-2.fc6.src.rpm

- builds in mock
- is fine for rpmlint
- and fixes all issuse mentioned in comment #18

This package is APPROVED

One last thing I'd like to mention: I would remove the lines about
desktop-file-utils from the changelog without further notice. They are confusing
people. Although a detailed changelog in general is a good thing, your
changelogs tend to be a little to elaborate. Some changes could easily be
summarized as "clean up specfile" or something like that.

I see you already are sponsored by Ed Hill, so I remove the Bug #177841 Tracker.
Do you have any other pending reviews or need further help?

Please keep in mind that FE CVS is currently broken, so you can't import your
package.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.