[Bug 216916] Review Request: arpack - Fortran77 subroutines for solving large scale eigenvalue problems

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Wed Nov 22 18:50:22 UTC 2006


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: arpack - Fortran77 subroutines for solving large scale eigenvalue problems


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216916


Jochen at herr-schmitt.de changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
         AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org    |Jochen at herr-schmitt.de




------- Additional Comments From Jochen at herr-schmitt.de  2006-11-22 13:50 EST -------
God:
+ Source package was not complainted by rpmlint.
* Local build works fine.
* Rpmlint is quited on binary packages.
* Local install/uninstall workds ok.
* Tarball matches with upstream.
* Mock build works fine.


Bad:
- Devel package should contains some documentation for developers.
I thins, that the stuff on /usr/doc/arpack-2.1/EXAMPLES shold be in
the developement package.
- Rpmlint complaints on installed package:
rpmlint arpack
W: arpack undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libarpack.so.2.1 etime_
W: arpack undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libarpack.so.2.1 slamch_
W: arpack undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libarpack.so.2.1 cgemv_
W: arpack undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libarpack.so.2.1 cscal_
--- A lot of simular lines ---

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list