[Bug 214830] Review Request: Limph - PHP network host monitor

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Mon Nov 27 19:21:51 UTC 2006


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: Limph - PHP network host monitor


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214830





------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net  2006-11-27 14:21 EST -------
Ok, the above links are again valid.  I had to re-do upstream since I forgot to
migrate a chunk of host_agent.php to config.php.  All better now, but I didn't
bump the release number, if I need to, let me know.

(In reply to comment #5)
> Hang on, scratch those, I forgot to migrate one thing to a different file.  Give
> me a few minutes. . . .
> 
> (In reply to comment #4)
> > Thanks, terribly helpful patch.  I've applied it, released upstream version
> > 1.9.4 to address the config file, tmp dir and tarball issues, updated spec
> > accordingly, rebuilt, and posted the results:
> > 
> > Spec URL: http://gryffindor.jcomserv.net/extras/limph/limph-3.spec
> > SRPM URL: http://gryffindor.jcomserv.net/extras/limph/limph-1.9.4-1.src.rpm
> > 
> > (In reply to comment #3)
> > > Created an attachment (id=141960)
 --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=141960&action=view) [edit] [edit] [edit]
> > > patch to spec file
> > > 
> > > Here's a patch that resolves some issues.
> > > 
> > > To fix the tar ball issue:
> > > 
> > > %setup -q -n %{name}
> > > 
> > > Then go back to %setup -q when you fix that.
> > > 
> > > Other issues:
> > > - still got some config files in /usr.	See my earlier suggestion about maybe
> > > having them include the password information from a common file in /etc/limph.
> > > - tmp dir is still wrong.  Do you really need your own tmp dir?  Can't be in
> > > /usr in any case.
> > > 
> > 
> > 
> 
> 



-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list