[Bug 214830] Review Request: Limph - PHP network host monitor
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Mon Nov 27 19:21:51 UTC 2006
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: Limph - PHP network host monitor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214830
------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2006-11-27 14:21 EST -------
Ok, the above links are again valid. I had to re-do upstream since I forgot to
migrate a chunk of host_agent.php to config.php. All better now, but I didn't
bump the release number, if I need to, let me know.
(In reply to comment #5)
> Hang on, scratch those, I forgot to migrate one thing to a different file. Give
> me a few minutes. . . .
>
> (In reply to comment #4)
> > Thanks, terribly helpful patch. I've applied it, released upstream version
> > 1.9.4 to address the config file, tmp dir and tarball issues, updated spec
> > accordingly, rebuilt, and posted the results:
> >
> > Spec URL: http://gryffindor.jcomserv.net/extras/limph/limph-3.spec
> > SRPM URL: http://gryffindor.jcomserv.net/extras/limph/limph-1.9.4-1.src.rpm
> >
> > (In reply to comment #3)
> > > Created an attachment (id=141960)
--> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=141960&action=view) [edit] [edit] [edit]
> > > patch to spec file
> > >
> > > Here's a patch that resolves some issues.
> > >
> > > To fix the tar ball issue:
> > >
> > > %setup -q -n %{name}
> > >
> > > Then go back to %setup -q when you fix that.
> > >
> > > Other issues:
> > > - still got some config files in /usr. See my earlier suggestion about maybe
> > > having them include the password information from a common file in /etc/limph.
> > > - tmp dir is still wrong. Do you really need your own tmp dir? Can't be in
> > > /usr in any case.
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
More information about the Fedora-package-review
mailing list