[Bug 174377] Review Request: gnu-smalltalk - GNU Smalltalk

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: gnu-smalltalk - GNU Smalltalk


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174377





------- Additional Comments From bonzini at gnu.org  2006-11-28 02:30 EST -------
I can reply as far as the upstream package is concerned...

> * %install section
>   - Fix broken Shebangs
>     (Please see "timestamp" section below for this).

Should not be necessary anymore.

>   - *.st files
>     Well, actually I first saw this utility so I don't quite know
>     how to use this package, however, are these *.st really required
>     for 'minimal' use of smalltalk? Or are these somewhat 'add-on'
>     files for smalltalk? (The judgment as of what is 'minimal' use
>     is up to you.)

They are needed to load the optional packages (e.g. sockets, GUI bindings, ...).

>   - /usr/share/gnu-smalltalk/unsupported/binary.c
>     rpmlint complains about this file as 'devel-file-in-non-devel-package'.
>     Would you explain why this file should be in main package?

I'm going to remove this from the upstream package too.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.