[Bug 217275] Review Request: ocsinventory-client - Open Computer and Software Inventory Next Generation client

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Tue Nov 28 21:14:01 UTC 2006


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: ocsinventory-client - Open Computer and Software Inventory Next Generation client


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217275





------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr  2006-11-28 16:13 EST -------
(In reply to comment #7)
> > In that case you can add a Requires on the directories, or have
> > ocsinventory-client own those directories, until they get owned by
> > the filesystem package.
> 
> Is this a MUST for the review ?

Yes. I make exception for /usr/share/icons/hicolor. 

In the packaging guidelines it is at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-a5931a7372c4a00065713430984fa5875513e6d4

And in that case I think it is relevant, since it materializes
whether you want to have a real dependency on logrotate/cron
or make logrotate/cron optional - which means that the package
owns the directory.

> I look at some core package and don't see anything...

Most core packages haven't gone through the guidelines and lacks the
fedora extras packages quality.

> Some improvement to have ocsinventory-client build and work on RHEL and older FC
> (i really need this at work).

With EPEL, this is indeed something acceptable or even encouraged. 
Besides in that case it doesn't really hurt legibility.

> Spec URL: http://remi.collet.free.fr/rpms/extras/ocsinventory-client.spec
> SRPM URL:
> http://remi.collet.free.fr/rpms/extras/ocsinventory-client-1.0-0.4.RC3.fc7.src.rpm
> 
> * Tue Nov 28 2006 Remi Collet <Fedora at famillecollet.com> 1.0-0.4.RC3
> - requires %%{_sbindir}/dmidecode (kernel-utils in FC3) rather than dmidecode 
> - requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT) only on Fedora (not provided on RHEL3)
> - patch improved (Fedora is RPM based)

Apart from directory owning, seems right. Notice that I didn't 
assign the bug to myself, so a reviewer accepting unowned 
directories for those directories can step up.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list