[Bug 210087] Review Request: pekwm - Light weight window manager
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Sat Oct 14 16:27:31 UTC 2006
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: pekwm - Light weight window manager
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210087
------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-10-14 12:27 EST -------
(In reply to comment #4)
> (In reply to comment #3)
> >
> When you say this do you mean to leave it like I have it now, or remove what I
> have now and let this stuff be places in %{_sysconfdir}
My proposal would be let this stuff be placed in %{_sysconfdir}.
and set scriptsdir=%{_bindir}.
And adjust paths.
> > Otherwise scripts use pkill from procps, and also there seems
> > to be a need for xprop, which is a virtual provides of
> > xorg-x11-utils.
>
> Does there need to be a requires for this or are they pretty much a standard
> tool to have on board?
They are standard, but I think we shouldn't assume anything,
especially for lightweight window managers, so requires should be
the right ones.
> Solved this. :)
And that's great :)
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
More information about the Fedora-package-review
mailing list