[Bug 211548] Review Request: fluxstyle - Graphical style manager for fluxbox
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Fri Oct 20 17:48:46 UTC 2006
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: fluxstyle - Graphical style manager for fluxbox
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211548
------- Additional Comments From miker5slow at grandecom.net 2006-10-20 13:48 EST -------
(In reply to comment #4)
> * There are missing:
>
> %dir %{_datadir}/%{name}-%{version}/glade/
> %dir %{_datadir}/%{name}-%{version}/images/
>
> * The .desktop file don't seem very right to me:
>
> - the MimeType seems very wrong
What do you think it should be?
> - In the categories, tere should certainly de somthing like
> System or Utilities.
Is there one that it should be more than the other, or do you think both maybe?
> - Icon entry is missing (and no icon is packaged)
> If the icon is fluxbox48x48-trans-metal-bevel.png, it should be
> copied to hicolor theme/48x48..... and the scriptlets should be
> called.
What icon is this for?? The one you are talking about is used in the aboutDialog
> * I am not convinced that fluxStyle.p* is rightly in
> /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/fluxstyle/, since it seems to be the
> same than the fluxStyle script in %_bindir. Am I missing something?
I didnt even realize I had this, I pulled it from svn
> * I don't thtink the shebang of
> /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/fluxstyle/__init__.py is right.
> It seems to me that it shouldn't have a shebang, and shouldn't be
> executable.
>
> I am not very knowledgable in python so the last 2 comments may be
> wrong.
You are right, I fixed this in svn and I am making a 1.0.1 release with this fix
and the one above. Ill put up another spec/src.rpm when I get home and get a
chance to make sure it all works :)
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
More information about the Fedora-package-review
mailing list