[Bug 188400] Review Request: ssmtp

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Mon Oct 30 16:31:57 UTC 2006


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: ssmtp


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188400





------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro  2006-10-30 11:31 EST -------
That is my point EXACTLY. But since my experience is very limited, I'd better
ask twice than bumping my head :)

Here is a short analysis of the up-to-date patches from debian unstable (the way
I see them; please bear with me if I am wrong and point me in the right direction):
- patch number 7 modifies some debian email addresses and activates IPv6 by
default; we do not really care about the first issue, second modification was
included in my spec file released on 2006-10-09;
- patch number 8 raises the ssl issue I would like clarifications for;
- patch number 9 a) activates cram-md5; this was already included in my spec
released 2006-04-09 b) fixes a portability issue introduced by the usage of a
glibc extension. Since the bug seems to occur on platforms non-supported by FE,
I contemplate the idea of including this patch but with a conditional (something
like rpmbuild --define "non-glibc 1" and a default value of 0 for this
variable). However, I assume this should not be a blocker for a FE package.
- all patches (7 to 10) add / correct some debconf translations.

Given the above, could you please let me know what modifications are still
needed,in order to get in shape for inclusion in FE ?


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list