From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 1 00:58:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 20:58:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203662] Review Request: dx - Open source version of IBM's Visualization Data Explorer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609010058.k810wFQZ024039@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dx - Open source version of IBM's Visualization Data Explorer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203662 ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2006-08-31 20:58 EST ------- Hm. Java parts are not supposed to build. I've intentionally commented out java BRs from the spec. Are you building in mock? If not, you probably have java-devel installed and configure picks that up and tries to build the java parts. It builds fine in mock for me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 1 01:17:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 21:17:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204560] Review Request: python-pydns - Another Pyhon DNS library. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609010117.k811Hb8p024961@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-pydns - Another Pyhon DNS library. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204560 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-08-31 21:17 EST ------- looks good. This package is APPROVED. I'd be happy to sponsor you... Continue the process from the "get a fedora account" section on: http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/Contributors -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 1 01:40:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 21:40:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204561] Review Request: python-pyspf - Sender Policy Framework library for Python. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609010140.k811eMfq026595@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-pyspf - Sender Policy Framework library for Python. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204561 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-08-31 21:40 EST ------- ok. Almost everything is fixed up, but I am still getting the rpmlint: E: python-pyspf non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/spf.py 0644 I don't think the construct you are using is working right. How about something like: sed -i -e 's|^#!/usr/bin/env python$||' %{python_sitelib}/spf.py -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 1 01:42:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 21:42:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204884] New: Review Request: bitlbee - An IRC to other chat networks gateway Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204884 Summary: Review Request: bitlbee - An IRC to other chat networks gateway Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: paul at xtdnet.nl QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: ftp://ftp.xelerance.com/bitlbee/bitlbee.spec SRPM URL: ftp://ftp.xelerance.com/bitlbee/bitlbee-1.0.3-1.src.rpm Description: An IRC to other chat networks gateway. This program can be used as an IRC server which forwards everything you say to people on other chat networks like MSN/ICQ/Jabber. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 1 02:09:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 22:09:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204561] Review Request: python-pyspf - Sender Policy Framework library for Python. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609010209.k8129hrA028857@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-pyspf - Sender Policy Framework library for Python. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204561 ------- Additional Comments From jafo-redhat at tummy.com 2006-08-31 22:09 EST ------- That does it, thanks Kevin. Spec URL: ftp://ftp.tummy.com/pub/tummy/RPMS/SRPMS/python-pyspf.spec SRPM URL: ftp://ftp.tummy.com/pub/tummy/RPMS/SRPMS/python-pyspf-1.7-5.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 1 02:17:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 22:17:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202356] Review Request: terminus-font - Clean fixed width font In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609010217.k812HeON029673@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: terminus-font - Clean fixed width font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202356 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-08-31 22:17 EST ------- 2. Ah, I missed that that was the console fonts package in that group. Looking around I can't seem to find any other packages that provide console fonts, so it's hard to say what group it should be in. :( I guess your "Application/Text" might be better than "User Interface/X" if you want to change it back. All the rest look fixed up... This package looks like it's good to be APPROVED. I would be happy to sponsor you... You should be able to continue the process from the "Get a Fedora Account" step on: http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/Contributors -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 1 02:22:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 22:22:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204561] Review Request: python-pyspf - Sender Policy Framework library for Python. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609010222.k812MdMc030306@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-pyspf - Sender Policy Framework library for Python. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204561 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-08-31 22:22 EST ------- Excellent. That looks good to go... this package is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 1 02:27:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 22:27:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199254] Review Request: perl-perlmenu In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609010227.k812RnRk030940@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-perlmenu https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199254 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |kevin at tummy.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-08-31 22:27 EST ------- Hey Parag. I would be happy to take a look at reviewing this and potentially sponsoring you, as long as none of the other folks above would like to dive in with a review/sponsorship... Look for a review later tonight or tomorrow unless someone else wants to step in first. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 1 02:44:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 22:44:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204884] Review Request: bitlbee - An IRC to other chat networks gateway In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609010244.k812iGcC032395@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bitlbee - An IRC to other chat networks gateway https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204884 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-08-31 22:44 EST ------- This would seem to be a duplicate of 196591. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196591 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 1 02:50:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 22:50:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204423] Review Request: libstroke - A stroke interface library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609010250.k812o4nC000303@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libstroke - A stroke interface library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204423 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-08-31 22:50 EST ------- Well, now the files/directories ownership consistency is okay. I checked my mock build and it turned out that automake is unnecessary for BuildRequires as automake and so on is not called in rebuilding and I suceeded in rebuilding this with automake removed from BR. Please remove automake from BuildRequires, which is the only things to be fixed. This package is APPROVED by me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 1 02:52:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 22:52:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204177] Review Request: digikam-doc - digiKam and Showfoto documentation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609010252.k812qMhF000488@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: digikam-doc - digiKam and Showfoto documentation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204177 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-08-31 22:52 EST ------- OK, ok, I'll go whip something up. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 1 02:54:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 22:54:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199254] Review Request: perl-perlmenu In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609010254.k812s0kp000653@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-perlmenu https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199254 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-08-31 22:53 EST ------- OK - Package name OK - Spec file matches base package name. OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines. See below - License(LGPL or Artistic) See below - License field in spec matches OK - License file included in package OK - Spec in American English OK - Spec is legible. OK - Sources match upstream md5sum: b931859ed581970f3fb05420316b39d3 perlmenu.v4.0.tar.gz b931859ed581970f3fb05420316b39d3 perlmenu.v4.0.tar.gz.1 OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch. OK - BuildRequires correct OK - Package owns all the directories it creates. OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files. OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. OK - Package has a correct %clean section. OK - Spec has consistant macro usage. OK - Package is code or permissible content. OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime. OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. OK - No rpmlint output. SHOULD Items: OK - Should include License or ask upstream to include it. OK - Should build in mock. Issues: 1. The license seems to have changed to LGPL or artistic, not GPL. You have: License: GPL or Artistic -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 1 02:55:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 22:55:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204177] Review Request: digikam-doc - digiKam and Showfoto documentation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609010255.k812tQHQ000769@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: digikam-doc - digiKam and Showfoto documentation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204177 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-08-31 22:55 EST ------- And, many thanks Paul for the hint on the auto* magic to make the .noarch build work. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 1 03:02:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 23:02:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199254] Review Request: perl-perlmenu In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609010302.k8132tpq001402@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-perlmenu https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199254 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-08-31 23:02 EST ------- Thanks for reviwing this package but i didn't get what you said in Issues? I checked upstream source contains both License file included in tarball so i kept both names under License tag. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 1 03:06:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 23:06:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199254] Review Request: perl-perlmenu In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609010306.k8136ffj001727@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-perlmenu https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199254 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-08-31 23:06 EST ------- The COPYING file and one of the Licenses they say this package is released under is the: GNU LIBRARY GENERAL PUBLIC LICENSE (LGPL) NOT the GENERAL PUBLIC LICENSE (GPL)... You need to change "GPL" to "LGPL" in your License tag. Does that make sense? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 1 03:24:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 23:24:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199254] Review Request: perl-perlmenu In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609010324.k813OjJx003326@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-perlmenu https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199254 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-08-31 23:24 EST ------- Ohh sorry my mistake here is updated URL's Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/pnemade/perl-perlmenu/perl-perlmenu.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/pnemade/perl-perlmenu/perl-perlmenu-4.0-4.fc6.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 1 03:35:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 23:35:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204601] Review Request: geda-examples - Circuit examples for gEDA In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609010335.k813Zclm004208@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: geda-examples - Circuit examples for gEDA https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204601 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 1 04:47:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2006 00:47:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203694] Review Request: rawstudio - digital camera raw-image converter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609010447.k814lvmh007998@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rawstudio - digital camera raw-image converter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203694 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |panemade at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-09-01 00:47 EST ------- {Not Official Review} packaging looks ok. + Mockbuild is successfull for i386 FC6 + rpmlint on binary rpm is silent + dist tag is present + Buildroot is correct + source URL is correct + BR is correct + License used is GPL + License file COPYING is included + MD5 sum on tarball is matching upstream tarball 391f2a08ef0e9dd32b8de51347420d7b rawstudio-0.3.tar.gz + No duplicate files -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 1 05:08:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2006 01:08:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204852] Review Request: tuxpaint-stamps - Extra stamp files for tuxpaint In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609010508.k8158e8t009012@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tuxpaint-stamps - Extra stamp files for tuxpaint https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204852 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |panemade at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-09-01 01:08 EST ------- {Not Official Review} packaging looks ok. + Mockbuild is successfull for i386 FC6 - rpmlint on binary rpm is NOT silent E: tuxpaint-stamps incorrect-locale-sv /usr/share/locale/sw/LC_MESSAGES/tuxpaint-stamps.mo + dist tag is present + Buildroot is correct + source URL is correct + BR is correct + License used is GPL + License file COPYING is included + MD5 sum on tarball is matching upstream tarball 6edf92504b1b9f9943e3b28011738691 tuxpaint-stamps-2005.11.25.tar.gz + No duplicate files -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 1 06:13:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2006 02:13:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204694] Review Request: zvbi - Raw VBI, Teletext and Closed Caption decoding library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609010613.k816Dsdb011281@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: zvbi - Raw VBI, Teletext and Closed Caption decoding library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204694 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |panemade at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-09-01 02:13 EST ------- rpmlint on binary rpm reported zvbi-0.2.22-1.fc6.i386.rpm I: zvbi checking W: zvbi no-reload-entry /etc/rc.d/init.d/zvbid In your init script (/etc/rc.d/init.d/your_file), you don't have a 'reload' entry, which is necessary for good functionality. W: zvbi incoherent-init-script-name zvbid The init script name should be the same as the package name in lower case. all above warnings have their descriptions given about how to solve them so follow that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 1 06:40:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2006 02:40:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204417] Review Request: telepathy-gabble - A Jabber/XMPP connection manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609010640.k816ewhM012307@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: telepathy-gabble - A Jabber/XMPP connection manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204417 ------- Additional Comments From sander at hoentjen.eu 2006-09-01 02:40 EST ------- Do you know 0.3.2 is out? I think it would be better to package that. 0.3.2 Requires a newer loudmouth version then we currently have, so maybe you can update that package as well. (The telepathy people told me they have lots of stability problems with the older (< 1.1.1) loudmouth version) Other then that I had a quick look at you specfile and it looks very good to me. I will try to do a review this evening (Europe) but if anyone beats me to it go right ahead since my mock currently isn't working so i am not sure yet i will be able to do the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 1 08:19:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2006 04:19:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203662] Review Request: dx - Open source version of IBM's Visualization Data Explorer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609010819.k818J2tb018206@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dx - Open source version of IBM's Visualization Data Explorer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203662 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2006-09-01 04:18 EST ------- (In reply to comment #9) > Hm. Java parts are not supposed to build. I've intentionally commented out java > BRs from the spec. This is not good enough for reproducible builds, as demonstrated in comment 8. If you intend to have the java parts not built, be explicit about it, eg. using an argument to ./configure, patch things, or as a last resort if everything else fails, try BuildConflicts. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 1 12:14:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2006 08:14:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204694] Review Request: zvbi - Raw VBI, Teletext and Closed Caption decoding library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609011214.k81CEHn0000781@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: zvbi - Raw VBI, Teletext and Closed Caption decoding library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204694 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rdieter at math.unl.edu ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-09-01 08:14 EST ------- > you don't have a 'reload' entry, which is necessary for good functionality. And if the daemon doesn't support reload? (alias it to restart?) > The init script name should be the same as the package name in lower case Not required, hence rpmlint marking this as a warning only, not an error. IMO, the script name should be the same as the daemon in question. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 1 12:16:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2006 08:16:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204694] Review Request: zvbi - Raw VBI, Teletext and Closed Caption decoding library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609011216.k81CGpF8000930@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: zvbi - Raw VBI, Teletext and Closed Caption decoding library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204694 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |rdieter at math.unl.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 1 12:19:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2006 08:19:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199168] Review Request: CGAL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609011219.k81CJRvP001099@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: CGAL Alias: CGAL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199168 ------- Additional Comments From tim at niemueller.de 2006-09-01 08:19 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=135376) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=135376&action=view) Patch for shared CGALQt lib With the attached patch you can modify the Makefile to produce a shared CGALQt lib. This works just fine and we have used this in production for more than a year. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 1 12:21:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2006 08:21:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196591] Review Request: bitlbee In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609011221.k81CLmSo001207@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bitlbee https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196591 ------- Additional Comments From paul at xtdnet.nl 2006-09-01 08:21 EST ------- oops. I hadnt seen this request, so i had started my own submission. Robert, please see bug 204884, where I made my package of bitlbee, having missed yours. I added one patch to fix an accept() call warning on x86_64. I also just used openssl since everyone has that installed. My configure also has some different arguments then yours. I am not sure why you need to make those perl calls. I didn't seem to need that. I used condrestart for xinetd, instead of just blindly starting it. I'll check your source rpm's xinetd file to see if you only bind to 127.0.0.1 as well, and install and compile it to see how it works on my system compared to the package I had made. Can bitlbee actually write to its config dir which you chown as "daemon"? I will do more testing for your package later today. It's time this package moves forward. As a seperate upstream bug, I think bitlbee's proxy use is not working, but that also needs more testing on my end. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 1 12:22:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2006 08:22:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204884] Review Request: bitlbee - An IRC to other chat networks gateway In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609011222.k81CMpOl001274@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bitlbee - An IRC to other chat networks gateway https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204884 ------- Additional Comments From paul at xtdnet.nl 2006-09-01 08:22 EST ------- oops. indeed. I will verify with the other submission and ensure that one moves forward. Once that package is approved, I'll close this bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 1 12:28:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2006 08:28:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204694] Review Request: zvbi - Raw VBI, Teletext and Closed Caption decoding library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609011228.k81CST9G001518@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: zvbi - Raw VBI, Teletext and Closed Caption decoding library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204694 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-09-01 08:28 EST ------- I can review this. At first glance, package looks clean, just a few items off the top of my head so far: 1. in -devel: Change Requires: zvbi = %{version}-%{release} to the less error-prone: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} 2. in %post/%postun fonts, change /usr/bin/fc-cache %{_datadir}/fonts to /usr/bin/fc-cache %{_datadir}/fonts/%{name} no need to tell fc-cache to reparse *all* of %_datadir/fonts, when we're only interested in %_datadir/fonts/%name 3. -fonts: I'm pretty sure there's no real need for Requires: fontconfig Requires(post): /usr/bin/fc-cache Requires(postun): /usr/bin/fc-cache The pkg doesn't *really* need/use fontconfig, and the calls to fc-cache in scriptlets are wrapped with: if [ -x /usr/bin/fc-cache ]; then ... fi -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 1 12:39:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2006 08:39:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204694] Review Request: zvbi - Raw VBI, Teletext and Closed Caption decoding library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609011239.k81Cd8tL001997@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: zvbi - Raw VBI, Teletext and Closed Caption decoding library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204694 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-09-01 08:39 EST ------- Ammend item 2: Only should change %post, I'd recommend: /usr/bin/fc-cache -f %{_datadir}/fonts/%{name} shouldn't change %postun, since %{_datadir}/fonts/%{name} no longer exists -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 1 12:41:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2006 08:41:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196591] Review Request: bitlbee In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609011241.k81Cf6Qo002114@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bitlbee https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196591 ------- Additional Comments From redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de 2006-09-01 08:41 EST ------- I'll review your x86_64 patch and add when there's a reference to a upstream bug report having the patch also applied (and maybe reviewed by upstream). Regarding openssl vs. gnutls please read the comments above. I'm not interested in gnutls but to make Michael happy, I'm using it - for the same non-technical reason you provide, too. Using condrestart for xinetd is accepted and will be added. I'm only binding to 127.0.0.1 and the package itself works for me about a year as you can see from my changelog ;-) This also should answer the question regarding "daemon"; yes, bitlbee can write to /var/lib/bitlbee, because it's set in the xinetd file. You're simply doing exactly the same, but using the user "nobody" for. But it would be interesting to know whether "daemon" or "nobody" is better... I think, I'll push a new package when you've the testing completed and I got more input. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 1 12:42:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2006 08:42:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200600] Review Request: phpPgAdmin - web based PostgreSQL administration In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609011242.k81CgtCB002220@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: phpPgAdmin - web based PostgreSQL administration https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200600 devrim at commandprompt.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 1 12:43:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2006 08:43:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199154] Review Request: Slony-1 (postgresql-slony-engine) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609011243.k81ChWWC002295@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Slony-1 (postgresql-slony-engine) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199154 devrim at commandprompt.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 1 12:44:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2006 08:44:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199682] Review Request: dbi-link - Partial implementation of the SQL/MED portion of the SQL:2003 specification In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609011244.k81CiVkZ002369@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dbi-link - Partial implementation of the SQL/MED portion of the SQL:2003 specification https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199682 devrim at commandprompt.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 1 12:44:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2006 08:44:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200630] Review Request: postgresql_autodoc - PostgreSQL AutoDoc Utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609011244.k81CimXn002412@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: postgresql_autodoc - PostgreSQL AutoDoc Utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200630 devrim at commandprompt.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 1 12:45:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2006 08:45:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202901] Review Request: pgFouine - PostgreSQL log analyzer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609011245.k81Cj9a4002456@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pgFouine - PostgreSQL log analyzer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202901 devrim at commandprompt.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 1 12:45:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2006 08:45:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196591] Review Request: bitlbee In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609011245.k81Cjha7002526@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bitlbee https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196591 ------- Additional Comments From redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de 2006-09-01 08:45 EST ------- Oh, I forgot to talk about the perl calling: You're using /usr/bin/install rather /usr/bin/make in %install, so it doesn't matter when you're breaking anything and fixing none of them. The %configure, which is a macro, is also useless, because the configure script of bitlbee doesn't recognize any of these given parameters (just have a look into it). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 1 12:52:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2006 08:52:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193224] Review Request: streamer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609011252.k81CqEa8002868@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: streamer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193224 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |CANTFIX ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-09-01 08:52 EST ------- Ok After seeing peoples getting sponserships within 2 days who claim to be newbies for this procedure, I think i did not deserved then to be Sponserer so i think its time to make Official reviewers burden less by closing this bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 1 12:52:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2006 08:52:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193216] Review Request: qcwebcam In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609011252.k81CqcIi002910@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qcwebcam https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193216 Bug 193216 depends on bug 193224, which changed state. Bug 193224 Summary: Review Request: streamer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193224 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |CANTFIX -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 1 12:52:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2006 08:52:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193216] Review Request: qcwebcam In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609011252.k81CqiXo002954@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qcwebcam https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193216 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |CANTFIX -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 1 12:56:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2006 08:56:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198330] Review Request: spca5xx-kmod-common In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609011256.k81CuVIi003217@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: spca5xx-kmod-common https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198330 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |CANTFIX ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-09-01 08:56 EST ------- I don't want to submit this package so want to close this bug -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 1 12:57:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2006 08:57:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198331] Review Request: spca5xx-kmod In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609011257.k81Cv0Bq003256@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: spca5xx-kmod https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198331 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |CANTFIX Bug 198331 depends on bug 198330, which changed state. Bug 198330 Summary: Review Request: spca5xx-kmod-common https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198330 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |CANTFIX Status|NEW |CLOSED ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-09-01 08:56 EST ------- I don't want to submit this package so want to close this bug -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 1 13:18:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2006 09:18:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204417] Review Request: telepathy-gabble - A Jabber/XMPP connection manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609011318.k81DI3CP004724@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: telepathy-gabble - A Jabber/XMPP connection manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204417 ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at ameritech.net 2006-09-01 09:18 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > Do you know 0.3.2 is out? I think it would be better to package that. 0.3.2 > Requires a newer loudmouth version then we currently have, so maybe you can > update that package as well. (The telepathy people told me they have lots of > stability problems with the older (< 1.1.1) loudmouth version) You are referring to the unstable release line for loudmouth, which I will not be updating to, since other packages (gossip, mugshot) depend upon loudmouth. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 1 14:12:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2006 10:12:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203217] Review Request: csound - music synthesis system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609011412.k81EC8MT007982@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: csound - music synthesis system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203217 paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-09-01 10:11 EST ------- In that case, I'm happy :-) APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 1 14:20:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2006 10:20:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204421] Review Request: kdetv - KDE application for watching TV In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609011420.k81EKsht008560@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdetv - KDE application for watching TV https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204421 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |rdieter at math.unl.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 1 14:22:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2006 10:22:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193224] Review Request: streamer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609011422.k81EMkNk008661@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: streamer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193224 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-09-01 10:22 EST ------- (In reply to comment #26) > Ok After seeing peoples getting sponserships within 2 days who claim to be > newbies for this procedure, I think i did not deserved then to be Sponserer so i > think its time to make Official reviewers burden less by closing this bug. I understand yur frustration at not being sponsored yet, despite being very active and doing everything asked of you, especially when you see other new contributors getting sponsored very quickly. Having already sponsored a few people, I've become very careful to make sure that I think any new contributor I sponsor now is fully aware of how how to work within Fedora Extras and not make too many mistakes (since I as their sponsor would end up having to fix them, which I've had to do in the past). As a result, it may be that the bar for being sponsored by me is higher than it would be for some other sponsors. Other issues for me include the fact that I've recently changed jobs and have less time to review submissions than I used to have (I've only done one review in the past couple of months I think). There's also the problem that I haven't got any means of testing either this or the qcwebcam submission. On the plus side, it looks like someone else may also be willing to sponsor you (Kevin in Bug #199254). You might refer Kevin to this ticket and the qcwebcam one as other examples of your work. Once you're sponsored, any contributor will then be able to review these submissions and it's more likely that someone with the right hardware will appear and be able to do that for you. So if I was you I'd reopen these tickets. They'll get in eventually, but that won't happen if the tickets are closed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 1 14:25:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2006 10:25:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204601] Review Request: geda-examples - Circuit examples for gEDA In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609011425.k81EPaqd008846@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: geda-examples - Circuit examples for gEDA https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204601 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-09-01 10:25 EST ------- This package is very simple and there exists little problems or questions. First review of geda-examples : 1. From http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines : * Requires * File and Directory Ownership - Well, this package may be unuseful without geda-gschem, however, does this package "really require" geda-gschem? I mean that for example, xorg-x11-docs maybe unuseful without xorg-x11 installed, however, xorg-x11-docs itself does not require anything. If the problem is only for the ownership of %{_datadir}/gEDA/ (owned by geda-schem), this is a good reason for geda-symbols to own %{_datadir}/gEDA/, too, and the requirement for geda-gschem can be removed. You can see for example that /usr/share/X11/ is owned by several packages, e.g. imake, libX11, xorg-x11-xsm, xorg-x11-apps, ..... - Another thing is %{_datadir}/gEDA/examples . This is also owned by geda-gschem. If you think that this package (geda-examples) really requires geda-gschem, then the entry of %dir %{gedaexampledir} can be removed. Well, the problem of ownership of directories is complicated when there are several packages which are mutually related. 2. From http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines : = Nothing. 3. Other things I have noticed: = Nothing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 1 14:29:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2006 10:29:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204421] Review Request: kdetv - KDE application for watching TV In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609011429.k81ETWPS009338@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdetv - KDE application for watching TV https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204421 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-09-01 10:29 EST ------- Looks good, off-hand a few quickies: 0. Curious, why is this GPL/LPGL? 1. SHOULD: instead of manually deleting applnk, instead use desktop-file-install --delete-original 2. SHOULD: Since this isn't a .desktop provided by fedora, imo, you needn't use: desktop-file-install --vendor="fedora" but instead use --vendor="" -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 1 14:44:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2006 10:44:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198331] Review Request: spca5xx-kmod In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609011444.k81EibhM010216@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: spca5xx-kmod https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198331 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776, 177841 |201449 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 1 14:46:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2006 10:46:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198330] Review Request: spca5xx-kmod-common In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609011446.k81Ek1m0010440@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: spca5xx-kmod-common https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198330 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776, 177841, 198331 |201449 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 1 14:46:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2006 10:46:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198331] Review Request: spca5xx-kmod In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609011446.k81Ekt3O010591@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: spca5xx-kmod https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198331 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn|198330 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 1 14:46:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2006 10:46:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193216] Review Request: qcwebcam In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609011446.k81EksPZ010583@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qcwebcam https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193216 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776, 177841 |201449 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 1 14:47:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2006 10:47:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193224] Review Request: streamer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609011447.k81ElMrL010648@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: streamer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193224 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776, 177841, 193216 |201449 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 1 14:47:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2006 10:47:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201337] Review Request: gcin - Chinese input method for Traditional Chinese In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609011447.k81ElePS010727@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gcin - Chinese input method for Traditional Chinese https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201337 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 1 14:47:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2006 10:47:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193216] Review Request: qcwebcam In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609011447.k81EliV5010748@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qcwebcam https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193216 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn|193224 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 1 15:12:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2006 11:12:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188974] Review Request: libGLw In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609011512.k81FCLCj012445@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libGLw https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188974 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-09-01 11:12 EST ------- spot's update looks good. Per comment #13 item 1, and mharris' agreement in comment #18, please rename pkg back to mesa-libGLw, and I'll APPROVE this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 1 16:21:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2006 12:21:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204852] Review Request: tuxpaint-stamps - Extra stamp files for tuxpaint In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609011621.k81GLRcU017138@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tuxpaint-stamps - Extra stamp files for tuxpaint https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204852 ------- Additional Comments From steve at silug.org 2006-09-01 12:21 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > - rpmlint on binary rpm is NOT silent > E: tuxpaint-stamps incorrect-locale-sv > /usr/share/locale/sw/LC_MESSAGES/tuxpaint-stamps.mo Sorry, I meant to mention this when I submitted the package. I think this is a bogus error, but either way I don't know how to fix it. More information here: https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-games-list/2006-August/msg00034.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 1 16:28:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2006 12:28:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199254] Review Request: perl-perlmenu In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609011628.k81GSHn4017407@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-perlmenu https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199254 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-09-01 12:28 EST ------- The package from comment #17 looks good to me. I see you have closed some of your other submissions. Sorry for the delay in getting you sponsored. Do you still want to maintain this package (and your other open submissions)? I hope so. Note that your (not closed) kmod submissions were likely stalled because kmod's are still in flux. Several of your other packages seem to have been pretty complicated to package, making them difficult for a first time packager. I know you have done a large amount of reviews on pending packages, and it seems to me that you are at the point where you understand the guidelines pretty well. I'm ready to APPROVE this package and sponsor you if you are still interested... let me know. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 1 16:38:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2006 12:38:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204694] Review Request: zvbi - Raw VBI, Teletext and Closed Caption decoding library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609011638.k81Gc4jt018019@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: zvbi - Raw VBI, Teletext and Closed Caption decoding library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204694 ------- Additional Comments From packages at amiga-hardware.com 2006-09-01 12:37 EST ------- > W: zvbi no-reload-entry /etc/rc.d/init.d/zvbid > In your init script (/etc/rc.d/init.d/your_file), you don't > have a 'reload' entry, which is necessary for good functionality. > > W: zvbi incoherent-init-script-name zvbid > The init script name should be the same as the package name in lower case. > > all above warnings have their descriptions given about how to solve them so > follow that. I'm in agreement with Rex on this one, I think calling the init script zvbi in this case doesn't make much sense, particularly when the daemon is really a small subset of the whole zvbi package, as opposed to being the primary function. It would require more than a simple namechange as the init script would need to be patched so that the 'subsystems' had matching names. Overkill I think for simply dropping the trailing 'd'. With wrt the reload option as it's considered optional I would rather not add it. IIRC primary reason for a reload option is to tell the daemon to reload its config files without quitting and starting again which is very useful for daemons that don't instantly stop or start such as squid, but in this case zvbid doesn't load configs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 1 17:28:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2006 13:28:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197974] Tracking bug for reviews stalled pending the adoption of guidelines In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609011728.k81HS5u6021201@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Tracking bug for reviews stalled pending the adoption of guidelines Alias: FE-GUIDELINES https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197974 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn|190101, 196749, 196793, | |196824, 196827, 196837, | |196843, 196847, 197411, | |197413, 197417, 197419, | |197420, 201502 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 1 17:28:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2006 13:28:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196847] Review Request: php-pear-PHPUnit2 - PEAR: Regression testing framework for unit tests In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609011728.k81HS6b8021214@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-PHPUnit2 - PEAR: Regression testing framework for unit tests Alias: php-pear-PHPUnit2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196847 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|197974 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 1 17:28:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2006 13:28:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201502] Review Request: php-pear-PhpDocumentor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609011728.k81HSJdw021250@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-PhpDocumentor Alias: phpDocumentor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201502 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|197974 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 1 17:28:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2006 13:28:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197413] Review Request: php-pear-Net-Curl - PEAR: OO interface to PHP's cURL extension In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609011728.k81HSrp6021300@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Net-Curl - PEAR: OO interface to PHP's cURL extension Alias: php-pear-Net-Curl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197413 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|197974 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 1 17:29:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2006 13:29:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196843] Review Request: php-pear-Benchmark - PEAR: Framework to benchmark PHP scripts or function calls In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609011729.k81HT4V5021329@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Benchmark - PEAR: Framework to benchmark PHP scripts or function calls Alias: php-pear-Benchmark https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196843 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|197974 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 1 17:29:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2006 13:29:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197417] Review Request: php-pear-Validate - PEAR: Validation class In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609011729.k81HTFk7021349@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Validate - PEAR: Validation class Alias: php-pear-Validate https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197417 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|197974 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 1 17:29:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2006 13:29:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196827] Review Request: php-pear-Image-GraphViz - PEAR: Interface to AT&T's GraphViz tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609011729.k81HTQdk021365@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Image-GraphViz - PEAR: Interface to AT&T's GraphViz tools Alias: pear-Image-GraphViz https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196827 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|197974 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 1 17:29:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2006 13:29:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197419] Review Request: php-pear-Validate-Finance-CreditCard - PEAR: Validation class for Credit Cards In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609011729.k81HTbEM021381@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Validate-Finance-CreditCard - PEAR: Validation class for Credit Cards Alias: Validate-Finance-CC https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197419 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|197974 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 1 17:29:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2006 13:29:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197411] Review Request: php-pear-Date - PEAR: Date and Time Zone Classes In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609011729.k81HTrND021400@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Date - PEAR: Date and Time Zone Classes Alias: php-pear-Date https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197411 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|197974 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 1 17:30:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2006 13:30:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197420] Review Request: php-pear-Payment-Process - PEAR: Unified payment processor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609011730.k81HU1cB021415@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Payment-Process - PEAR: Unified payment processor Alias: pear-Payment-Process https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197420 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|197974 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 1 17:30:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2006 13:30:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196837] Review Request: php-pear-PHPUnit2-alpha - PEAR: Regression testing framework for unit tests In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609011730.k81HUCD7021442@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-PHPUnit2-alpha - PEAR: Regression testing framework for unit tests Alias: pear-PHPUnit2-alpha https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196837 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|197974 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 1 17:30:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2006 13:30:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196824] Review Request: php-pear-Mail-Mime In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609011730.k81HUD8s021456@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Mail-Mime Alias: php-pear-Mail-Mime https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196824 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|197974 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 1 17:30:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2006 13:30:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190101] Review Request: php-pear-Log In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609011730.k81HUPpX021479@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Log Alias: php-pear-Log https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190101 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|197974 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 1 17:30:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2006 13:30:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196749] Review Request: php-pecl-xdebug - PECL package for debugging PHP scripts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609011730.k81HUbHr021531@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pecl-xdebug - PECL package for debugging PHP scripts Alias: php-pecl-xdebug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196749 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|197974 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 1 17:30:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2006 13:30:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196793] Review Request: php-pear-MDB2 - PEAR: Database Abstraction Layer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609011730.k81HUmOl021579@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-MDB2 - PEAR: Database Abstraction Layer Alias: php-pear-MDB2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196793 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|197974 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 1 17:30:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2006 13:30:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204954] New: Review Request: libofa - Open Fingerprint Architecture library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204954 Summary: Review Request: libofa - Open Fingerprint Architecture library Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rdieter at math.unl.edu QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://kde-redhat.unl.edu/apt/kde-redhat/SPECS/libofa.spec SRPM URL: http://kde-redhat.unl.edu/apt/kde-redhat/all/SRPMS.stable/libofa-0.9.3-1.src.rpm Description: Currently, MusicDNS and the Open Fingerprint Architecture are being used to: * identify duplicate tracks, even when the metadata is different, MusicIP identifies the master recording. * fix metadata * find out more about tracks by connecting to MusicBrainz -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 1 17:42:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2006 13:42:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204955] New: Review Request: digikamimageplugins-doc - Documentation for digiKamimageplugins Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204955 Summary: Review Request: digikamimageplugins-doc - Documentation for digiKamimageplugins Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rdieter at math.unl.edu QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://kde-redhat.unl.edu/apt/kde-redhat/SPECS/digikamimageplugins-doc.spec SRPM URL: http://kde-redhat.unl.edu/apt/kde-redhat/all/SRPMS.stable/digikamimageplugins-doc-0.8.2-1.src.rpm Description: Documentation for digiKamimageplugins. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 1 17:44:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2006 13:44:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204954] Review Request: libofa - Open Fingerprint Architecture library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609011744.k81HiJA9022531@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libofa - Open Fingerprint Architecture library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204954 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-09-01 13:44 EST ------- This is a (new) dependency for libtunepimp-0.5.x -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 1 17:47:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2006 13:47:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204177] Review Request: digikam-doc - digiKam and Showfoto documentation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609011747.k81Hl0m4022669@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: digikam-doc - digiKam and Showfoto documentation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204177 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-09-01 13:46 EST ------- FYI, digikamimageplugins-doc bug #204955 Marcin or Paul, maybe one of you would be interested in reviewing? :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 1 17:51:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2006 13:51:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204417] Review Request: telepathy-gabble - A Jabber/XMPP connection manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609011751.k81HpiCn022934@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: telepathy-gabble - A Jabber/XMPP connection manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204417 ------- Additional Comments From sander at hoentjen.eu 2006-09-01 13:51 EST ------- GOOD - package meets naming and packaging guidelines. - specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. - dist tag is present. - build root is correct. - license field matches the actual license. - license is open source-compatible. License text included in package. - source files match upstream: feb6766c1d2f984f1f37ffc8889e6faa - BuildRequires are proper. - package builds in mock (x86_64). - rpmlint is silent. - final provides and requires are sane: telepathy-gabble-0.3.1-1.fc6.x86_64.rpm telepathy-gabble = 0.3.1-1.fc6 = libdbus-1.so.3()(64bit) libdbus-glib-1.so.2()(64bit) libglib-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgobject-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libloudmouth-1.so.0()(64bit) telepathy-gabble-debuginfo-0.3.1-1.fc6.x86_64.rpm telepathy-gabble-debuginfo = 0.3.1-1.fc6 = - no shared libraries are present. - package is not relocatable. - owns the directories it creates. - doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. - no duplicates in %files. - file permissions are appropriate. - %clean is present. - no scriptlets present. - code, not content. - documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. - %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. - no headers. - no pkgconfig files. - no libtool .la droppings. - not a GUI app. - not a web app. MINOR: Not the latest version is being packaged, but that is ok in this case. If you do want to package the latest version (0.3.2) you can use --disable-loudmouth-versioning In both cases (if i understand correctly) there might be some crashing due to connection errors, but this will be fixed when the unstable branch of loudmouth is released as stable. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 1 18:51:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2006 14:51:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200064] Review Request: libpano12 : Library and tools for manipulating panoramic images In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609011851.k81Ip3I2028785@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libpano12 : Library and tools for manipulating panoramic images https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200064 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-09-01 14:50 EST ------- Hey Bruno. I see you have applied for sponsorship... You might want to take a look at: http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/HowToGetSponsored It's hard for sponsors to know you are ready based on just one package. Do you have more to submit to give a better idea? Or if you can add comments to other reviews that will show that you understand the guidelines... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 1 18:52:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2006 14:52:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177232] Review Request: regionset - reads/sets the region code of DVD drives In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609011852.k81IqdrS028961@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: regionset - reads/sets the region code of DVD drives https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177232 rpm at greysector.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2006-09-01 14:52 EST ------- Imported and built for devel. Thanks for the review! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 1 19:09:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2006 15:09:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204561] Review Request: python-pyspf - Sender Policy Framework library for Python. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609011909.k81J911M030498@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-pyspf - Sender Policy Framework library for Python. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204561 jafo-redhat at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From jafo-redhat at tummy.com 2006-09-01 15:09 EST ------- The package was imported and built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 1 19:10:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2006 15:10:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204560] Review Request: python-pydns - Another Pyhon DNS library. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609011910.k81JANgj030560@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-pydns - Another Pyhon DNS library. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204560 jafo-redhat at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From jafo-redhat at tummy.com 2006-09-01 15:10 EST ------- The package was imported and built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 1 19:10:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2006 15:10:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204561] Review Request: python-pyspf - Sender Policy Framework library for Python. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609011910.k81JAjdt030595@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-pyspf - Sender Policy Framework library for Python. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204561 Bug 204561 depends on bug 204560, which changed state. Bug 204560 Summary: Review Request: python-pydns - Another Pyhon DNS library. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204560 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 1 19:40:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2006 15:40:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204694] Review Request: zvbi - Raw VBI, Teletext and Closed Caption decoding library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609011940.k81Jev2R000462@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: zvbi - Raw VBI, Teletext and Closed Caption decoding library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204694 ------- Additional Comments From packages at amiga-hardware.com 2006-09-01 15:40 EST ------- Here's the latest version incorporating the three fixes from above. Spec URL: http://dribble.org.uk/reviews/zvbi.spec SRPM URL: http://dribble.org.uk/reviews/zvbi-0.2.22-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 1 19:50:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2006 15:50:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204975] New: Review Request: vigra - Generic Programming for Computer Vision Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204975 Summary: Review Request: vigra - Generic Programming for Computer Vision Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: bruno at postle.net QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://bugbear.blackfish.org.uk/~bruno/apt/SPECS/vigra.spec SRPM URL: http://bugbear.blackfish.org.uk/~bruno/apt/fedora/linux/5/x86_64/SRPMS.panorama/vigra-1.4.0-1.src.rpm Description: VIGRA stands for "Vision with Generic Algorithms". It's a novel computer vision library that puts its main emphasis on customizable algorithms and data structures. By using template techniques similar to those in the C++ Standard Template Library, you can easily adapt any VIGRA component to the needs of your application, without thereby giving up execution speed. Note 1: I've been maintaining this and other packages in a 3rd party repository which I'd like to migrate to Extras, so I need a sponsor. Note 2: vigra is a dependency for the lprof package. Note 3: This library gets statically linked to libtiff/jpeg/png. I'd appreciate pointers for getting it to link dynamically. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 1 20:07:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2006 16:07:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200064] Review Request: libpano12 : Library and tools for manipulating panoramic images In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609012007.k81K7IQ9001825@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libpano12 : Library and tools for manipulating panoramic images https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200064 ------- Additional Comments From bruno at postle.net 2006-09-01 16:07 EST ------- (In reply to comment #19) > Do you have more to submit to give a better idea? Yes lots: http://bugbear.blackfish.org.uk/~bruno/apt/fedora/linux/5/x86_64/SRPMS.panorama/ I've created another review request for vigra: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204975 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 1 20:40:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2006 16:40:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204421] Review Request: kdetv - KDE application for watching TV In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609012040.k81KeRb0003852@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdetv - KDE application for watching TV https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204421 ------- Additional Comments From packages at amiga-hardware.com 2006-09-01 16:40 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > 0. Curious, why is this GPL/LPGL? Included in the original archive are the two license files COPYING (GPL) and COPYING.LIB (LGPL) so I thought, perhaps incorrectly that kdetv's libs were LGPL but kdetv is itself GPL. :-) > 1. SHOULD: instead of manually deleting applnk, instead use > desktop-file-install --delete-original Thanks, I've fixed this. > 2. SHOULD: Since this isn't a .desktop provided by fedora, imo, you needn't use: > desktop-file-install --vendor="fedora" > but instead use --vendor="" I've fixed this also, the latest version should be listed below, thanks :) http://dribble.org.uk/reviews/kdetv.spec http://dribble.org.uk/reviews/kdetv-0.8.9-3.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 1 21:04:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2006 17:04:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 169345] Review Request: SEC - Simple Event Correlator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609012104.k81L4NxB005940@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: SEC - Simple Event Correlator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=169345 ------- Additional Comments From lists at forevermore.net 2006-09-01 17:04 EST ------- The package has been created and added to CVS. I apparently can't resolve the ticket, so someone else will have to close it for me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 1 21:13:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2006 17:13:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 169345] Review Request: SEC - Simple Event Correlator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609012113.k81LDZkY006285@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: SEC - Simple Event Correlator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=169345 paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 1 21:20:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2006 17:20:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 169345] Review Request: SEC - Simple Event Correlator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609012120.k81LKXZZ006737@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: SEC - Simple Event Correlator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=169345 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-09-01 17:20 EST ------- build successfull for devel... closing this bug for Chris. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 1 22:04:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2006 18:04:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196591] Review Request: bitlbee In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609012204.k81M46gw008668@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bitlbee https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196591 michael at knox.net.nz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|michael at knox.net.nz |nobody at fedoraproject.org OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163776 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From michael at knox.net.nz 2006-09-01 18:04 EST ------- I no longer have time to review this. Sorry, putting back out in the wild. Hopefully its picked up soon. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 1 23:29:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2006 19:29:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201873] Review Request: wmix - Dockapp mixer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609012329.k81NT15Y011111@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wmix - Dockapp mixer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201873 jtorresh at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jtorresh at gmail.com 2006-09-01 19:28 EST ------- Hi Patrice, I'm going to review this now. I apologize for the delay. * Since you're pretty much doing the whole installation process manually, why don't you just copy the 'wmix' binary to %{_bindir} and avoid the use of "make install"? (There's nothing wrong with your current approach, though). REVIEW (wmix-3.1-1) + rpmlint shows no error. + package meets the naming guidelines. + spec-file is properly named. + package meets the packaging guidelines. + package license is open-source compatible (GPL). + license field matches the actual license. + license file included in %doc. + spec file is written in english. + spec file is legible. + source files match upstream: 62f6e86f7558f193e081dc29444a6699 wmix-3.1.tar.gz + package successfully compiled, built and tested on i386 (rawhide). + all build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires. + package doesn't need to use %find_lang (no locales present). + package doesn't contain shared libraries. + package isn't relocatable. + package owns all directories that it creates. + no duplicate files in %files. + file permissions are properly set. + package has a %clean section containing rm -rf %{buildroot}. + package uses macros consistently. + package contains code, not content. + no -doc subpackage needed. + %docs don't affect application runtime. + package doesn't contain headers, static libraries or pkgconfig files (no devel package). + package doesn't own directories owned by other packages. + package builds fine in mock (fedora-development-i386-core). APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 1 23:38:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2006 19:38:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204423] Review Request: libstroke - A stroke interface library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609012338.k81NcbVK011654@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libstroke - A stroke interface library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204423 cgoorah at yahoo.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 1 23:38:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2006 19:38:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204598] Review Request: geda-gschem - Electronics schematics editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609012338.k81NcmXK011674@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: geda-gschem - Electronics schematics editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204598 Bug 204598 depends on bug 204423, which changed state. Bug 204423 Summary: Review Request: libstroke - A stroke interface library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204423 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 1 23:47:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2006 19:47:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 178922] Review Request: asterisk - The Open Source PBX In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609012347.k81NlDAE012052@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: asterisk - The Open Source PBX https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=178922 ------- Additional Comments From dwmw2 at redhat.com 2006-09-01 19:47 EST ------- We should build without -DZAPTEL_OPTIMIZATIONS. The timing stuff can be done with POSIX timers instead, and then I think the use of the zaptel devices is restricted to chan_zap and app_meetme. We should include app_conference. Since we're unlikely to ship zaptel kernel modules until/unless they're merged upstream, we need to make 100% sure they're _optional_ for our build of Asterisk. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 1 23:59:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2006 19:59:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204263] Review Request: geda-symbols - Electronic symbols for gEDA In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609012359.k81NxJgM012354@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: geda-symbols - Electronic symbols for gEDA https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204263 cgoorah at yahoo.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2006-09-01 19:59 EST ------- # geda-symbols is the Owner of the following directories #%dir %{_datadir}/gEDA #%dir %{_datadir}/gEDA/bitmap #%dir %{_datadir}/gEDA/docs #%dir %{_datadir}/gEDA/docs/man #%dir %{_datadir}/gEDA/examples #%dir %{_datadir}/gEDA/scheme fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 1 23:59:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2006 19:59:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204598] Review Request: geda-gschem - Electronics schematics editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609012359.k81NxU38012382@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: geda-gschem - Electronics schematics editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204598 Bug 204598 depends on bug 204263, which changed state. Bug 204263 Summary: Review Request: geda-symbols - Electronic symbols for gEDA https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204263 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 2 00:00:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2006 20:00:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204605] Review Request: geda-gsymcheck - Symbol checker for electronics schematics editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609020000.k8200DBO012503@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: geda-gsymcheck - Symbol checker for electronics schematics editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204605 Bug 204605 depends on bug 204263, which changed state. Bug 204263 Summary: Review Request: geda-symbols - Electronic symbols for gEDA https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204263 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 2 00:04:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2006 20:04:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 178922] Review Request: asterisk - The Open Source PBX In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609020004.k8204gIM012663@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: asterisk - The Open Source PBX https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=178922 ------- Additional Comments From dwmw2 at redhat.com 2006-09-01 20:04 EST ------- Start of POSIX timer stuff here: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-dev/2005-May/012906.html pselect() does work now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 2 00:17:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2006 20:17:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204605] Review Request: geda-gsymcheck - Symbol checker for electronics schematics editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609020017.k820HpqQ013045@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: geda-gsymcheck - Symbol checker for electronics schematics editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204605 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2006-09-01 20:17 EST ------- Updated: Spec URL: http://chitlesh.funpic.de/rpm/geda-gsymcheck.spec SRPM URL: http://chitlesh.funpic.de/rpm/geda-gsymcheck-20060123-4.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 2 00:31:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2006 20:31:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204598] Review Request: geda-gschem - Electronics schematics editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609020031.k820VFvB013464@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: geda-gschem - Electronics schematics editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204598 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2006-09-01 20:31 EST ------- Updated: Spec URL: http://chitlesh.googlepages.com/geda-gschem.spec SRPM URL: http://chitlesh.googlepages.com/geda-gschem-20060123-4.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 2 00:36:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2006 20:36:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197353] Review Request: man-pages-fr - French man pages from the Linux Documentation Project In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609020036.k820amnv013770@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: man-pages-fr - French man pages from the Linux Documentation Project https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197353 ------- Additional Comments From alain.portal at free.fr 2006-09-01 20:36 EST ------- Spec URL: http://linuxelectronique.free.fr/download/fedora/5/SPECS/man-pages-fr.spec SRPM URL: http://linuxelectronique.free.fr/download/fedora/5/SRPMS/man-pages-fr-2.39.0-8.src.rpm %changelog * Fri Sep 2 2006 Alain Portal 2.39.0-8 - New ${SOURCE1} tarball : no more net-tools pages in this tarball * Fri Sep 1 2006 Alain Portal 2.39.0-7 - New ${SOURCE2} tarball * Sun Aug 27 2006 Alain Portal 2.39.0-6 - Don't remove the cups package man pages : there is no french man pages in this package. * Wed Aug 23 2006 Alain Portal 2.39.0-5 - New ${SOURCE1} tarball : domainename.1, hostname.1, ethers.5, arp.8, ifconfig.8, plipconfig.8, route.8 and slattch.8 are no more in this tarball, so, no need to remove them. Remove some new pages of the net-tools package : mii-tools.8, nameif.8, netstat.8, rarp.8 * Sat Aug 18 2006 Alain Portal 2.39.0-4 - New ${SOURCE2} tarball * Fri Aug 18 2006 Alain Portal 2.39.0-3 - New ${SOURCE1} tarball : vim-common man pages are no more in this tarball, so, no need to remove them. * Tue Aug 14 2006 Alain Portal 2.39.0-2 - Remove 5 new pages that are own by the vim-common package -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 2 00:39:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2006 20:39:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204601] Review Request: geda-examples - Circuit examples for gEDA In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609020039.k820dW3M013906@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: geda-examples - Circuit examples for gEDA https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204601 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2006-09-01 20:39 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > This package is very simple and there exists little > problems or questions. > > > First review of geda-examples : > > 1. From http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines : > > * Requires > * File and Directory Ownership > > - Well, this package may be unuseful without geda-gschem, > however, does this package "really require" geda-gschem? > > I mean that for example, xorg-x11-docs maybe unuseful without > xorg-x11 installed, however, xorg-x11-docs itself does not > require anything. > The files provided by this package can be read via schematic editor. That is why it requires geda-gschem Updated: Spec URL: http://chitlesh.funpic.de/rpm/geda-examples.spec SRPM URL: http://chitlesh.funpic.de/rpm/geda-examples-20060123-4.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 2 01:22:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2006 21:22:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189093] Review Request: mono-debugger In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609020122.k821MRAj014870@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mono-debugger https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189093 jpmahowald at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2006-09-01 21:22 EST ------- + License (MIT) + source matches upstream + builds fine on x86_64, with libdir patch + devel package with pkgconfig file + name-version-release follows guidelines + proper use of macros + proper file permissions + *.la files removed + proper clean section APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 2 02:44:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2006 22:44:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193446] Review Request: GLiv: OpenGL image viewer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609020244.k822iWDP017942@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: GLiv: OpenGL image viewer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193446 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-09-01 22:44 EST ------- Hey Madcat, sorry for the lack of recent activity here... Since you are seeking sponsorship, you might want to take a look at: http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/HowToGetSponsored If you have additional packages to submit or can add review comments to other pending packages that may help sponsors in determining that you understand the guidelines and are ready for sponsorship. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 2 02:50:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2006 22:50:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 178922] Review Request: asterisk - The Open Source PBX In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609020250.k822oQpr018341@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: asterisk - The Open Source PBX https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=178922 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kevin at tummy.com ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-09-01 22:50 EST ------- So is it possible to build asterisk so it works fine without zaptel modules, but will work with them if they were installed from something like a 3rd party repository? ie, dynamic detection of them? also, if you are reviewing this perhaps change the blocker from FE_NEW to FE_REVIEW? :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 2 03:15:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2006 23:15:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 195871] Review Request: obmenu In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609020315.k823FSo2019966@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: obmenu https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195871 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |kevin at tummy.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-09-01 23:15 EST ------- Thanks for the prelim comments Parag. Here's a formal review: OK - Package name OK - Spec file matches base package name. OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines. OK - License (GPL) OK - License field in spec matches OK - License file included in package OK - Spec in American English OK - Spec is legible. OK - Sources match upstream md5sum: 710036a5edc9886d6d563ce46c747432 obmenu-1.0.tar.gz 710036a5edc9886d6d563ce46c747432 obmenu-1.0.tar.gz.1 OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch. OK - BuildRequires correct OK - Package owns all the directories it creates. OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files. OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. OK - Package has a correct %clean section. OK - Spec has consistant macro usage. OK - Package is code or permissible content. OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime. See below - Package is a GUI app and has a .desktop file OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. OK - No rpmlint output. SHOULD Items: OK - Should include License or ask upstream to include it. OK - Should build in mock. Issues: 1. The new improved python guidelines require not ghosting, but including the .pyo files. Can you make that change? 2. You don't use python_sitearch, so might skip defining it at the top. 3. Should this package have a desktop file? See: http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#desktop 4. If I install this package and try and run it, I get: Error: "/home/kevin/.config/openbox/menu.xml" not found Should this package then 'Require: openbox' ? Or otherwise require a menu.xml file? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 2 03:29:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2006 23:29:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 178922] Review Request: asterisk - The Open Source PBX In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609020329.k823T7Pm020924@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: asterisk - The Open Source PBX https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=178922 dwmw2 at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From dwmw2 at redhat.com 2006-09-01 23:28 EST ------- Yes, that's the plan. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 2 03:53:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2006 23:53:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193224] Review Request: streamer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609020353.k823rElY022353@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: streamer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193224 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-09-01 23:53 EST ------- Paul, I am not blaming here anyone at all as i already said may be i did not deserved to get sponsorship. I already said is one of my bugs that i am ready to wait. But what made me to write my previous comment is that after seeing toher newbies getting sponsorships within 2 days. So anyway i am not leaving to review/add comments here as it became a part of my hobbies as well my hunger to review other peoples packages. But i decided to stop submitting packages. I have already 2 packages ready to submit but i was waiting for my sponsorship. But due to some other work i failed to prove myself. And i don't understand why you are taking resposibility to comment here. I thinks its THL's responsibility to answer here. I request Thorsten Leemhuis to comment here as it looks its assigned to him. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 2 04:07:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2006 00:07:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199254] Review Request: perl-perlmenu In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609020407.k8247hYf022686@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-perlmenu https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199254 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-09-02 00:07 EST ------- Thanks Kevin, Because my other package gutenprint is already in a better position and that package required this package, it will not be good to close this bug. I was thinking to close this bug yesterday only like i did others. But i saw already many peoples facing problems with existing gimp-print package. I helped some peoples also by recommending gutenprint and got response from them that this is awesome package and its really really needed here as FC is my favorite distro. Therefore i submitted package here. So i will continue to have maintainership for this and gutenprint package. But will not going to reopen my other bugs at all. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 2 04:15:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2006 00:15:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199021] Review Request: zynaddsubfx - Real-time software synthesizer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609020415.k824FvJY022869@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: zynaddsubfx - Real-time software synthesizer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199021 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-09-02 00:15 EST ------- OK, this looks good. The /usr/share/icons/hicolor/* directories are owned by a dependency, and /usr/share/pixmaps is owned by filesystem so there's no problem there. That was the last of the issues I could see. Do note that your last change caused this rpmlint warning to pop up: W: zynaddsubfx mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs because you indented the one line you added with a tab instead of spaces as in the rest of the specfile. This is just rpmlint being picky and is not a blocker. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 2 04:32:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2006 00:32:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199254] Review Request: perl-perlmenu In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609020432.k824WxDS023290@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-perlmenu https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199254 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778, 177841 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-09-02 00:32 EST ------- Ok. I think thats unfortunate, but I'm glad you are willing to maintain this and gutenprint (once it's approved). Perhaps down the road you will be interested in trying to get some more packages imported. :) In any case, this package is APPROVED. I would be happy to sponsor you. Can you continue the process from step 10 at: http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/Contributors If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me via email or catch me on the #fedora-extras irc channel (nick: nirik). I can probibly take a look at gutenprint later in the weekend, unless someone else does so first. Don't forget to close this bug as NEXTRELEASE once it's been imported and built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 2 04:42:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2006 00:42:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204164] Review Request: perl-LWP-Authen-Wsse - Library for enabling X-WSSE authentication in LWP In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609020442.k824gjX4023631@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-LWP-Authen-Wsse - Library for enabling X-WSSE authentication in LWP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204164 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-09-02 00:42 EST ------- This fails to build for me due to failing tests; I added a BR: perl(Digest::SHA1) and things are fine. I'll work up a review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 2 04:52:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2006 00:52:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204166] Review Request: xeuphoric - an X based Oric emulator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609020452.k824qepj023857@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xeuphoric - an X based Oric emulator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204166 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-09-02 00:52 EST ------- I note a typo in the URL:; s/treaser/teaser/. I'm not sure how you can say that the ROMs are not a problem. Unless you can prove that the copyright has expired or has been relinquished to the public domain, I don't think you have any redistribution permission. This would seem to be a rather significant issue. For reference, here is the relevant statement from the README file: LEGAL atmos.rom, microdisc.rom and oric1.rom are copyright 1983 Tangerine. Tangerine is defunct. We don't know who the current assignee of the copyright is (if any). hyperbasic.rom, teleass.rom, telematic.rom and telemon-2.4.rom are copyright Oric International. Oric International is defunct. We don't know who the current assignee of the copyright is (if any). jasmin.rom is copyright Technologie Recherche et Applications Nouvelles. As far as I know, T.R.A.N. doesn't exist anymore. We don't know who the current assignee of the copyright is (if any). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 2 04:59:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2006 00:59:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188478] Review Request: fxload-2002_04_11.spec In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609020459.k824xiCx023952@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fxload-2002_04_11.spec https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188478 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |nobody at fedoraproject.org OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-09-02 00:59 EST ------- Removing FE-NEEDSPONSOR, as submitter was sponsored in: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190070 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 2 05:09:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2006 01:09:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 175047] Review Request: NetworkManager-openvpn In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609020509.k8259tZ9024219@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: NetworkManager-openvpn https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175047 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-09-02 01:09 EST ------- Can this bug be closed now? There is a NetworkManager-openvpn bugzilla component now... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 2 05:11:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2006 01:11:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199920] Review Request: Palantir In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609020511.k825BEEf024312@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Palantir https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199920 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-09-02 01:11 EST ------- Removing FE-NEEDSPONSOR, as submitter was sponsored in: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175047 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 2 05:17:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2006 01:17:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199108] Review Request: gutenprint: Printer Drivers Package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609020517.k825H8JS024469@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gutenprint: Printer Drivers Package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199108 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |nobody at fedoraproject.org OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-09-02 01:17 EST ------- Removing FE-NEEDSPONSOR as submitter was sponsored in: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199254 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 2 05:20:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2006 01:20:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197732] Review Request: optipng - a PNG optimizer and converter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609020520.k825KG6s024550@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: optipng - a PNG optimizer and converter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197732 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |nobody at fedoraproject.org OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-09-02 01:20 EST ------- Removing FE-NEEDSPONSOR as submitter was already sponsored in: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197442 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 2 05:23:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2006 01:23:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 195871] Review Request: obmenu In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609020523.k825NNl5024675@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: obmenu https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195871 ------- Additional Comments From peter at thecodergeek.com 2006-09-02 01:23 EST ------- Thanks for the preliminary review, Kevin. (In reply to comment #3) > Issues: > 1. The new improved python guidelines require not ghosting, but including > the .pyo files. Can you make that change? Fixed in 1.0-2. > 2. You don't use python_sitearch, so might skip defining it at the top. I don't think this is really much of a problem per se, but I have removed it in 1.0-2 as suggested. > 3. Should this package have a desktop file? > See: > http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#desktop Added in 1.0-2. > 4. If I install this package and try and run it, I get: > Error: "/home/kevin/.config/openbox/menu.xml" not found > Should this package then 'Require: openbox' ? Or otherwise > require a menu.xml file? Well, the openbox package does not create a menu.xml file of any sorts in the user's home directory. However, I'd very much prefer *not* to dink around with stuff inside of /home as part of a package. For the time being, I've packaged a README.Fedora file (as %doc) that contains instructions on copying the default menu to your home directory. I've also sent an email upstream about this (and included the text of that in the README.Fedora file). Does this suffice? :) URLs for 1.0-2 are as follows: Spec: http://thecodergeek.com/downloads/fedora/obmenu.spec SRPM: http://thecodergeek.com/downloads/fedora/obmenu-1.0-2.src.rpm Thanks for your time and review! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 2 05:23:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2006 01:23:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191036] Review Request: libmp4v2 a library for handling the mp4 container format In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609020523.k825NeDD024699@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libmp4v2 a library for handling the mp4 container format https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191036 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |nobody at fedoraproject.org OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-09-02 01:23 EST ------- Removing FE-NEEDSPONSOR as submitter was sponsored in: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191592 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 2 05:53:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2006 01:53:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188542] Review Request: hylafax In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609020553.k825rmga025595@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hylafax https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188542 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-09-02 01:53 EST ------- Adding FE-NEEDSPONSOR blocker. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 2 05:53:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2006 01:53:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193224] Review Request: streamer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609020553.k825rxhj025623@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: streamer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193224 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-09-02 01:53 EST ------- (In reply to comment #28) > And i don't understand why you are taking resposibility to comment here. I > thinks its THL's responsibility to answer here. > > I request Thorsten Leemhuis to comment here as it looks its assigned to him. Thorsten's address was the default one assigned to new review requests (nobody at fedoraproject.org is now used for this purpose). Having a buig assigned to that address means that nobody has yet decided to formally review a package, that's all. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 2 06:03:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2006 02:03:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193224] Review Request: streamer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609020603.k826362C025867@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: streamer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193224 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-09-02 02:03 EST ------- yes i discussed that on #fedora-extras with kevin. I thought the new procedure is followed to all older review request bugs also and i only check current state of bug before sending any comments. So thought maybe while creating this bug it got assigned to thl but blocker bug clearly indicated that its not under FE-REVIEW. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 2 06:36:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2006 02:36:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193106] Review Request: gtkmozembedmm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609020636.k826a260026428@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtkmozembedmm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193106 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |kevin at tummy.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-09-02 02:35 EST ------- OK - Package name OK - Spec file matches base package name. OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines. OK - License (LGPL) OK - License field in spec matches OK - License file included in package OK - Spec in American English OK - Spec is legible. See below - Sources match upstream md5sum: See below - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch. See below - BuildRequires correct See below - Spec has needed ldconfig in post and postun OK - Package owns all the directories it creates. OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files. OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. OK - Package has a correct %clean section. OK - Spec has consistant macro usage. OK - Package is code or permissible content. OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime. OK - Headers/static libs in -devel subpackage. OK - .pc files in -devel subpackage. OK - .so files in -devel subpackage. OK - -devel package Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} OK - .la files are removed. See below - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. See below - No rpmlint output. SHOULD Items: OK - Should include License or ask upstream to include it. See below - Should build in mock. Issues: 1. Source's don't match from upstream: 2e15fa5ac91ee0d8434d79fb0bb2badd gtkmozembedmm-1.4.2.tar.gz d4233234e0af148764cb59d578f101fd gtkmozembedmm-1.4.2.tar.gz.1 2. Is this package targeted for fc5 only? devel/rawhide/fc6 doesn't have mozilla-devel. 3. The URL doesn't seem to mention this library at all: URL: http://gtkmm.sourceforge.net/ Is there a more approprate one? 4. Since ldconfg is the only command you are running in the post and postun, you might change them to '%post -p /sbin/ldconfig' and '%postun -p /sbin/ldconfig' 5. Might not include the useless INSTALL and perhaps you should include the TODO file. 6. It doesn't seem to want to build here in mock for fc5: + ./configure --build=i686-redhat-linux-gnu --host=i686-redhat-linux-gnu -- target=i386-redhat-linux-gnu --program-prefix= --prefix=/usr --exec-prefix=/usr --bindir=/usr/bin --sbindir=/usr/sbin --sysconfdir=/etc --datadir=/usr/share -- includedir=/usr/include --libdir=/usr/lib --libexecdir=/usr/libexec -- localstatedir=/var --sharedstatedir=/usr/com --mandir=/usr/share/man --infodir=/ usr/share/info --disable-static --enable-docs configure: error: cannot find install-sh or install.sh in scripts ./scripts error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.22962 (%build) RPM build errors: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.22962 (%build) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 2 07:03:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2006 03:03:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190101] Review Request: php-pear-Log In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609020703.k82739hn027066@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Log Alias: php-pear-Log https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190101 ------- Additional Comments From Fedora at FamilleCollet.com 2006-09-02 03:03 EST ------- SPEC : http://remi.collet.free.fr/rpms/extras/php-pear-Log.spec SRPM : http://remi.collet.free.fr/rpms/extras/php-pear-Log-1.9.8-2.fc5.src.rpm Mock : http://remi.collet.free.fr/rpms/extras/php-pear-Log-build.log Changes : - update to 1.9.8 - failsafe scriplet -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 2 07:30:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2006 03:30:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190957] Review Request: php-pear-Net-Socket In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609020730.k827Uu7W028045@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Net-Socket Alias: php-pear-Net-Socket https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190957 ------- Additional Comments From Fedora at FamilleCollet.com 2006-09-02 03:30 EST ------- Spec: http://remi.collet.free.fr/rpms/extras/php-pear-Net-Socket.spec SRPM: http://remi.collet.free.fr/rpms/extras/php-pear-Net-Socket-1.0.6-3.fc5.src.rpm Mock: http://remi.collet.free.fr/rpms/extras/php-pear-Net-Socket-build.log Changes: - install Licence in prep - use new macros from /etc/rpm/macros.pear - own /usr/share/pear/Net - require php >= 4.3.0 (info from PHP_CompatInfo) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 2 07:44:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2006 03:44:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199021] Review Request: zynaddsubfx - Real-time software synthesizer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609020744.k827iM7w028945@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: zynaddsubfx - Real-time software synthesizer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199021 green at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From green at redhat.com 2006-09-02 03:44 EST ------- Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 2 07:52:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2006 03:52:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190958] Review Request: php-pear-Net-SMTP In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609020752.k827qTqt029303@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Net-SMTP Alias: php-pear-Net-SMTP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190958 ------- Additional Comments From Fedora at FamilleCollet.com 2006-09-02 03:52 EST ------- Spec: http://remi.collet.free.fr/rpms/extras/php-pear-Net-SMTP.spec SRPM: http://remi.collet.free.fr/rpms/extras/php-pear-Net-SMTP-1.2.8-3.fc5.src.rpm Mock: http://remi.collet.free.fr/rpms/extras/php-pear-Net-SMTP-build.log Changes: - install Licence in prep - use new macros from /etc/rpm/macros.pear - own /usr/share/pear/Net - require php >= 4.0.5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 2 08:10:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2006 04:10:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192583] Review Request: php-pear-XML-Parser - XML parsing class based on PHP's bundled expat In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609020810.k828AUU1030564@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-XML-Parser - XML parsing class based on PHP's bundled expat Alias: php-pear-XML-Parser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192583 ------- Additional Comments From Fedora at FamilleCollet.com 2006-09-02 04:10 EST ------- Spec: http://remi.collet.free.fr/rpms/extras/php-pear-XML-Parser.spec SRPM: http://remi.collet.free.fr/rpms/extras/php-pear-XML-Parser-1.2.7-2.fc5.src.rpm Mock: http://remi.collet.free.fr/rpms/extras/php-pear-XML-Parser-build.log Changes: - use new macros from /etc/rpm/macros.pear - own /usr/share/pear/XML - require php >= 4.2.0 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 2 08:22:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2006 04:22:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196847] Review Request: php-pear-PHPUnit2 - PEAR: Regression testing framework for unit tests In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609020822.k828MV8x001427@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-PHPUnit2 - PEAR: Regression testing framework for unit tests Alias: php-pear-PHPUnit2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196847 Fedora at FamilleCollet.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |Fedora at FamilleCollet.com ------- Additional Comments From Fedora at FamilleCollet.com 2006-09-02 04:22 EST ------- Daniel, Build failed because you didn't use the latest php-pear (1.4.9-1.2 on fc5) with /etc/rpm/macros.pear. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 2 08:46:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2006 04:46:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204495] Review Request: perl-GStreamer - GStreamer Perl module In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609020846.k828kC12002657@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-GStreamer - GStreamer Perl module https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204495 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-09-02 04:46 EST ------- Ok, I'm going to chalk this one up to devel being in a state of perpetual rebuilding. If errors persist into fc6t3, let's open bugs and I'll drive them to where they need to be. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 2 09:45:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2006 05:45:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204417] Review Request: telepathy-gabble - A Jabber/XMPP connection manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609020945.k829jpMl006232@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: telepathy-gabble - A Jabber/XMPP connection manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204417 ------- Additional Comments From sander at hoentjen.eu 2006-09-02 05:45 EST ------- Hmm I know I said approved but I just thought of something of which i am not sure. You have: %dir %{_datadir}/telepathy/ %dir %{_datadir}/telepathy/managers/ is it ok for other packages to have this as well, or can there be only one owner? If only one owner, telepathy-gabble should not be the owner. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 2 10:16:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2006 06:16:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193867] Review Request: klamav - Clam Anti-Virus on the KDE Desktop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609021016.k82AGAkO007670@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: klamav - Clam Anti-Virus on the KDE Desktop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193867 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2006-09-02 06:16 EST ------- **** The "Update Process died unexpectedly! Did you kill it manually?" bug and solution chitlesh(~)[0]$pkgs=`rpm -qa | grep clam`; echo $pkgs; rpm -V $pkgs clamav-data-0.88.4-1.fc5 clamav-lib-0.88.4-1.fc5 clamav-0.88.4-1.fc5 clamav-devel-0.88.4-1.fc5 chitlesh(~)[0]$klamav /bin/bash: freshclam: command not found QLayout "unnamed" added to Klamav "KlamAV ", which already has a layout /bin/bash: freshclam: command not found I was missing clamav-update Add clamav-update as Requires. * rpmlint issues chitlesh(~)[0]$rpmlint /home/chitlesh/rpmbuild/RPMS/i386/klamav-0.38-1.i386.rpm W: klamav dangling-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/klamav02/common /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/common W: klamav symlink-should-be-relative /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/klamav02/common /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/common W: klamav non-executable-in-bin /usr/bin/ScanWithKlamAV 0644 E: klamav non-executable-script /usr/bin/ScanWithKlamAV 0644 chitlesh(~)[0]$rpmlint /home/chitlesh/rpmbuild/RPMS/i386/klamav-debuginfo-0.38-1.i386.rpm E: klamav-debuginfo script-without-shellbang /usr/src/debug/klamav-0.38/src/klammail/client.c E: klamav-debuginfo script-without-shellbang /usr/src/debug/klamav-0.38/src/klammail/options.c E: klamav-debuginfo script-without-shellbang /usr/src/debug/klamav-0.38/src/klammail/options.h E: klamav-debuginfo script-without-shellbang /usr/src/debug/klamav-0.38/src/klammail/clamdmail.c E: klamav-debuginfo script-without-shellbang /usr/src/debug/klamav-0.38/src/klammail/treewalk.c chitlesh(~)[0]$rpmlint /home/chitlesh/rpmbuild/SRPMS/klamav-0.38-1.src.rpm chitlesh(~)[0]$ You should check rpmlint on all your *.rpm **** Using %{buildroot} and %{optflags} vs $RPM_BUILD_ROOT and $RPM_OPT_FLAGS - Mixed use is found. Please unify the usage. You could use %{__rm} -rf %{buildroot} instead of %{__rm} -rf "${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}" **** Correct and update the spec file and srpm, i'll check them again -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 2 10:17:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2006 06:17:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204166] Review Request: xeuphoric - an X based Oric emulator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609021017.k82AHT76007719@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xeuphoric - an X based Oric emulator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204166 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-09-02 06:17 EST ------- I've looked further into this and according to companies house in the UK, every company who had any rights to the ROMS have vanished with no successor in name or title. Of course, if it's a big problem, I'll package the ROMS in the same way as I did for fuse-emulator to keep things clean. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 2 10:27:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2006 06:27:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 195645] Review Request: rasqal - RDF query library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609021027.k82ARDUU008242@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rasqal - RDF query library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195645 ------- Additional Comments From thomas at apestaart.org 2006-09-02 06:27 EST ------- Jason, obviously there is disagreement over this. So as I've stated before, unless you insist or do not want to review/approve this package over this issue, I want to keep it as it is. I am however far too jaded when it comes to Fedora to not consider the pragmatic approach given how bad chances are in general to get a package through :) But I do need your official insistance if there is such. Thanks Thomas -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 2 12:07:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2006 08:07:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204598] Review Request: geda-gschem - Electronics schematics editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609021207.k82C7CwE012569@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: geda-gschem - Electronics schematics editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204598 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-09-02 08:07 EST ------- Second review for geda-gschem. 1. From http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines : * Encoding - iconv -f EUCJP -t UTF8 AUTHORS.tmp > AUTHORS && \ Well... not EUCJP but ISO-8859-1 at this case. * Desktop files - Well: fedora-gschem.desktop has the entry: Icon=geda However, no icons are included in this package. Also, geda.png is included in geda rpm. If you want to use this png file, this bug must be blocked by bug 204259 and Requires: geda is needed. Perhaps you don't want this. So + Copy some png (or xpm) file and include it in this package. ( or you can use xpm file included in this package ). + Install the image file into /usr/share/icons/hicolor/...... as gschem.{png,xpm} (or use link) + Call gtk-update-icon-cache on %post and %postun. = File and Directory Ownership is now solved. 2. From http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines : = Nothing. 3. Other things I have noticed: = Nothing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 2 12:19:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2006 08:19:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204605] Review Request: geda-gsymcheck - Symbol checker for electronics schematics editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609021219.k82CJM47012939@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: geda-gsymcheck - Symbol checker for electronics schematics editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204605 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-09-02 08:19 EST ------- Well, * iconv -f EUCJP -t UTF8 AUTHORS.tmp > AUTHORS && \ Not EUCJP , this case is "iconv -f ISO-8859-1 -t UTF8 ....." Fix it, which is the only things to be fixed. This package is APPROVED by me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 2 12:28:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2006 08:28:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204598] Review Request: geda-gschem - Electronics schematics editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609021228.k82CSi6H013232@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: geda-gschem - Electronics schematics editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204598 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2006-09-02 08:28 EST ------- Updated: Spec URL: http://chitlesh.googlepages.com/geda-gschem.spec SRPM URL: http://chitlesh.googlepages.com/geda-gschem-20060123-5.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 2 12:28:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2006 08:28:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204601] Review Request: geda-examples - Circuit examples for gEDA In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609021228.k82CSwXn013251@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: geda-examples - Circuit examples for gEDA https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204601 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-09-02 08:28 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > (In reply to comment #2) > > - Well, this package may be unuseful without geda-gschem, > > however, does this package "really require" geda-gschem? > > > The files provided by this package can be read via schematic editor. That is why > it requires geda-gschem > Okay. > Updated: > Spec URL: http://chitlesh.funpic.de/rpm/geda-examples.spec > SRPM URL: http://chitlesh.funpic.de/rpm/geda-examples-20060123-4.src.rpm Well, it seems okay, however, this bug is blocked by bug 204598 (geda-gschem) and currently I cannot change the status of this bug. if the status bug 204598 changed, I can re-review (perhaps final check) this later. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 2 13:17:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2006 09:17:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204598] Review Request: geda-gschem - Electronics schematics editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609021317.k82DHnEe014488@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: geda-gschem - Electronics schematics editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204598 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-09-02 09:17 EST ------- Well: * As for Source2: Please specify the URL from which this png file can be gained, and if you did some action (like image type conversion) to create this png file, explain it briefly. * install -m 644 examples/*.sch %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/gEDA/examples install -m 644 examples/README.* %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/gEDA/examples install -m 644 scheme/*.scm %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/gEDA/scheme Use "install -p" Well, I want to recheck this once more. Please upload the new spec and srpm and I will check them (perhaps it is a final check). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 2 14:17:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2006 10:17:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204417] Review Request: telepathy-gabble - A Jabber/XMPP connection manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609021417.k82EH77A015906@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: telepathy-gabble - A Jabber/XMPP connection manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204417 ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at ameritech.net 2006-09-02 10:17 EST ------- Other packages can have this as well, but what package do you think should own this if not telepathy-gabble? BTW, if your approve still stands could you do the rest of the reviewer steps necessary according to the wiki? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines#head-e1a114b23499786e13113ebf072d03a8f8d02094 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 2 14:23:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2006 10:23:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189093] Review Request: mono-debugger In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609021423.k82ENFwR016121@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mono-debugger https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189093 paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE OtherBugsDependingO|163779 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-09-02 10:23 EST ------- I've had to add excludearch-ppc to get it to build on the buildsys due to missing definitions in the ppc %{_includedir}/sys/user.h file -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 2 15:10:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2006 11:10:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189093] Review Request: mono-debugger In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609021510.k82FAVvU017273@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mono-debugger https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189093 paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |179260 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 2 15:32:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2006 11:32:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205023] New: Review Request: filelight-1.0 - cool diskspace use browser for kde Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205023 Summary: Review Request: filelight-1.0 - cool diskspace use browser for kde Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: ndbecker2 at verizon.net QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://nbecker.dyndns.org:8080/RPM/filelight.spec SRPM URL: http://nbecker.dyndns.org:8080/RPM/filelight-1.0-1.src.rpm Description: Filelight graphically represents a file system as a set of concentric segmented-rings, indicating where diskspace is being used. Segments expanding from the center represent files (including directories), with each segment's size being proportional to the file's size and directories having child segments. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 2 15:56:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2006 11:56:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 195645] Review Request: rasqal - RDF query library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609021556.k82Fu2U0018874@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rasqal - RDF query library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195645 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-09-02 11:55 EST ------- Actually there's not much in the way of disagreement. The guidelines currently state: Fedora's RPM includes a %makeinstall macro but it must NOT be used when make install DESTDIR=%{buildroot} will work. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-fcaf3e6fcbd51194a5d0dbcfbdd2fcb7791dd002 Note "must". This was voted on by the packaging committee and ratified by FESCo and the Fedora Board. Now, I'm not currently reviewing this, so anybody else is free to take it and perhaps you will find a reviewer who is willing to ignore the guidelines here. I don't, however, think anyone is really going to want to deal with the fallout which would almost certainly occur from that. I'm not going to insist that you make any changes to your package, but personally I think there's not much chance it being accepted into Extras otherwise. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 2 15:58:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2006 11:58:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205023] Review Request: filelight-1.0 - cool diskspace use browser for kde In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609021558.k82Fwm7r018935@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: filelight-1.0 - cool diskspace use browser for kde https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205023 ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at ameritech.net 2006-09-02 11:58 EST ------- You might want to review the Packaging Guidelines for FE. Just a quick look at your spec, and I can see some things that obviously need to be fixed before this can be approved. For example, the desktop file is handled incorrectly, and your using the Vendor & Packager tags. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 2 16:15:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2006 12:15:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 195645] Review Request: rasqal - RDF query library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609021615.k82GFSGH019433@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rasqal - RDF query library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195645 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-09-02 12:15 EST ------- If you ignore the guidelines then what is the point of having them. Hell, let's have a free for all where we can do what we please, shove what we want where we want and to hell if we end up with a distro as screwed up as XP. If a package doesn't follow the guidelines, it doesn't get in. Simple as that. There is a *very* rare case where a package can break the guidelines, but it's so rare that I've only come across it once and even then the breakage delayed getting the package in by weeks as FESCo discussed it. Not even the RedHat engineers can break the packaging guidelines, so it's not as if it's one rule for one and another for another. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 2 16:23:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2006 12:23:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193889] Review Request: ht2html - The www.python.org Web site generator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609021623.k82GNeVU019681@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ht2html - The www.python.org Web site generator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193889 ifoox at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Flag|needinfo?(ifoox at redhat.com) | ------- Additional Comments From ifoox at redhat.com 2006-09-02 12:23 EST ------- My appologies for the very long delay, I was away and couldn't attend to these packages. They have now been built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 2 16:24:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2006 12:24:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193898] Review Request: Jython - Java source interpreter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609021624.k82GOE0u019724@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Jython - Java source interpreter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193898 Bug 193898 depends on bug 193889, which changed state. Bug 193889 Summary: Review Request: ht2html - The www.python.org Web site generator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193889 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO_REPORTER Status|NEEDINFO_REPORTER |NEEDINFO Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|NEEDINFO |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 2 16:27:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2006 12:27:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205029] New: Review Request: autobuild-applet - a GNOME applet for monitoring Test-AutoBuild build status Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205029 Summary: Review Request: autobuild-applet - a GNOME applet for monitoring Test-AutoBuild build status Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: berrange at redhat.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://berrange.com/~dan/fedora-review/autobuild-applet/autobuild-applet.spec SRPM URL: http://berrange.com/~dan/fedora-review/autobuild-applet/autobuild-applet-1.0.3-1.src.rpm Description: AutoBuild Applet provides a GNOME panel applet for monitoring the status of Test-AutoBuild automated build engines via their RSS feed. It can monitor one or more build engines, and provides a small icon in the panel showing whether latest build suceeded or failed. It also provides a summary window showing fine grained per-module build status. Test-AutoBuild itself is not yet submitted to Fedora Extras, but will be in the near future. The applet itself, however, has no build or runtime dependancies on Test-AutoBuild since it interacts via the remote RSS feed. The applet is primarily Python / PyGTK, however, it has a small python C module to access libegg panel APIs. This is my first contribution to Fedora Extras, hence I require someone to sponser this submission. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 2 16:28:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2006 12:28:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177211] Review Request: newsx - NNTP news exchange utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609021628.k82GSxEl019902@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: newsx - NNTP news exchange utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177211 ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2006-09-02 12:28 EST ------- Builds fine in both fc6 and fc5 mock here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 2 16:29:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2006 12:29:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205029] Review Request: autobuild-applet - a GNOME applet for monitoring Test-AutoBuild build status In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609021629.k82GTCBO019909@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: autobuild-applet - a GNOME applet for monitoring Test-AutoBuild build status https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205029 berrange at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 2 16:42:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2006 12:42:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 182173] Review Request: eterm - a color vt102 terminal emulator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609021642.k82GgY9Q020290@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eterm - a color vt102 terminal emulator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=182173 terjeros at phys.ntnu.no changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |NEW Keywords| |Reopened Resolution|WONTFIX | ------- Additional Comments From terjeros at phys.ntnu.no 2006-09-02 12:42 EST ------- New package based on 0.9.4 with o rpath problem fixed o LICENSE taken from upstream package SPEC: http://web.phys.ntnu.no/~terjeros/eterm/eterm.spec SRPM: http://web.phys.ntnu.no/~terjeros/eterm/eterm-0.9.4-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 2 16:45:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2006 12:45:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205030] New: Review Request: atomix - Little mind game where you have to build molecules out of atoms lying around Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205030 Summary: Review Request: atomix - Little mind game where you have to build molecules out of atoms lying around Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fedora at leemhuis.info QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.leemhuis.info/files/fedorarpms/SPECS.fdr/atomix.spec SRPM URL: http://www.leemhuis.info/files/fedorarpms/SRPMS.fdr/atomix-2.14.0-1.src.rpm Description: Atomix is yet another little mind game. You have to build molecules out of single atoms laying around. Of course there is a time limit and the handling is not as easy as you might expect ;-). This game is inspiried by the orignal Amiga game Atomix and uses the GNOME librarys. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 2 16:47:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2006 12:47:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 195871] Review Request: obmenu In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609021647.k82Glp9N020485@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: obmenu https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195871 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-09-02 12:47 EST ------- That all sounds good. All the blockers I was seeing appear to be fixed, so this package is APPROVED. Don't forget to close this package with NEXTRELEASE when it's been imported and built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 2 16:49:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2006 12:49:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204417] Review Request: telepathy-gabble - A Jabber/XMPP connection manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609021649.k82Gni1c020540@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: telepathy-gabble - A Jabber/XMPP connection manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204417 ------- Additional Comments From sander at hoentjen.eu 2006-09-02 12:49 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > Other packages can have this as well, but what package do you think should own > this if not telepathy-gabble? Yes, that is the hard part. I don't know, but if somebody wants only to chat over msn netwrok he would just have to install telepathy-msn and not telepathy-gabble, so telepathy-msn should own the dirs in that case. But if i understand things correctly multiple packages owning the same dir is not good. If it is ok then I have no problems, but if it is indeed bad then we have to find a solution. One thing I can think of is having a telepathy-managers package which would be required by all tp connection managers and owns those dirs, but I don't know how such a package is viewed upon, and if there are better solutions. > > BTW, if your approve still stands could you do the rest of the reviewer steps > necessary according to the wiki? > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines#head-e1a114b23499786e13113ebf072d03a8f8d02094 Yes I want that but this is the first package I am formally reviewing and i am waiting until my fedorabugs membership is approved -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 2 16:50:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2006 12:50:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 182175] Review Request: libast - handy routines and drop-in substitutes for some good-but-non-portable functions (needed by eterm) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609021650.k82GodT3020573@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libast - handy routines and drop-in substitutes for some good-but-non-portable functions (needed by eterm) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=182175 ------- Additional Comments From terjeros at phys.ntnu.no 2006-09-02 12:50 EST ------- (In reply to comment #15) > For what it's worth, there's now a LICENSE file in LibAST. URL? $ wget http://www.eterm.org/download/libast-0.7.tar.gz $ tar tzvf libast-0.7.tar.gz | grep -ic LIC 0 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 2 17:00:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2006 13:00:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204228] Review Request: sleuthkit - Open Source forensic toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609021700.k82H0o0s020856@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sleuthkit - Open Source forensic toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204228 ------- Additional Comments From berrange at redhat.com 2006-09-02 13:00 EST ------- * The Packager & Vendor tags should not be included, nor refer to the Dag Wieers repository. Please remove them. * The %setup macro is better invoked with the -q arg since there is no need to pollute build output with a list of files being extracted from the tar.gz * The build process in the package is not honouring the $RPM_OPTS_FLAGS compiler settings. For example - its compiling with -O -g : gcc -DLINUX2 -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE -DVER=\"2.05\" -I../auxtools -I../imgtools -O -Wall -g -c -o jcat.o jcat.c While current Fedora build flags are: -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 It would be very desirable to have the build process honour these options since they enable various security protection measures. A cursory look at the source code suggests it would probably need a patch applied to the Makefiles since they are hand-written instead of using AutoTools. IMHO, such a patch would be worthwhile, unless there are specific problems compiling the tools with these flags. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 2 17:06:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2006 13:06:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205030] Review Request: atomix - Little mind game where you have to build molecules out of atoms lying around In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609021706.k82H6SvN021017@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: atomix - Little mind game where you have to build molecules out of atoms lying around https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205030 paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 2 17:14:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2006 13:14:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 182175] Review Request: libast - handy routines and drop-in substitutes for some good-but-non-portable functions (needed by eterm) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609021714.k82HE5B2021266@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libast - handy routines and drop-in substitutes for some good-but-non-portable functions (needed by eterm) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=182175 ------- Additional Comments From mej at eterm.org 2006-09-02 13:13 EST ------- (In reply to comment #16) > URL? > > $ wget http://www.eterm.org/download/libast-0.7.tar.gz > $ tar tzvf libast-0.7.tar.gz | grep -ic LIC > 0 Sorry, should've specified. libast 0.7.1 in CVS has a LICENSE file. You can pull the tarball from the cAos SRPM if you'd like: http://mirror.caosity.org/cAos-2/ext/autobuilder/i386/00_LOGS/e/libast/SRPMS/libast-0.7.1-0.20060818.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 2 17:15:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2006 13:15:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204525] Review Request: eclipse-gef - Eclipse Graphical Editing Framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609021715.k82HF8SM021349@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-gef - Eclipse Graphical Editing Framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204525 ------- Additional Comments From green at redhat.com 2006-09-02 13:14 EST ------- More on rpmlint output... ========= eclipse-gef-3.2.0-2.i386.rpm W: eclipse-gef non-standard-group Text Editors/Integrated Development Environments (IDE) The other IDEs in Fedora Extras use "Development/Tools". On the other hand, eclipse-gef isn't really an IDE or a tool, it's just a library that can also be used for RCP apps and not just within Eclipse. I recommend changing this to "System Environment/Libraries", since that's all this really is. W: eclipse-gef invalid-license Eclipse Public License - v 1.0 (EPL) Please just change this to "Eclipse Public License". We don't put URLs here. W: eclipse-gef no-documentation The packaging rules say... "If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc." I realize that Eclipse & friends install license somewhere else by default, but we should really put a copy in this directory as well as per the packaging guidelines. Eventually this should be done for all Eclipse packages. I think maybe only one or two do this today. ========= eclipse-gef-examples-3.2.0-2.i386.rpm W: eclipse-gef-examples non-standard-group Text Editors/Integrated Development Environments (IDE) W: eclipse-gef-examples invalid-license Eclipse Public License - v 1.0 (EPL) As above. ========= eclipse-gef-sdk-3.2.0-2.i386.rpm W: eclipse-gef-sdk non-standard-group Text Editors/Integrated Development Environments (IDE) I think this should be "Documentation". W: eclipse-gef-sdk invalid-license Eclipse Public License - v 1.0 (EPL) As above. W: eclipse-gef-sdk no-documentation I think this is ignoreable. ========= eclipse-gef-3.2.0-2.src.rpm W: eclipse-gef non-standard-group Text Editors/Integrated Development Environments (IDE) W: eclipse-gef invalid-license Eclipse Public License - v 1.0 (EPL) As above. W: eclipse-gef mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs Just run emacs untabify on the spec file before building. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 2 17:50:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2006 13:50:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205030] Review Request: atomix - Little mind game where you have to build molecules out of atoms lying around In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609021750.k82HoH2l024973@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: atomix - Little mind game where you have to build molecules out of atoms lying around https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205030 wart at kobold.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |wart at kobold.org ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2006-09-02 13:50 EST ------- The game is setgid games, but doesn't appear to completely drop setgid privileges after starting up, according to /proc//status. In fact, there are two processes created when atomix runs, one without setgid privileges, and one with. This seems to use gnome functions to handle the scoreboard file, so I'd be curious to learn how gnome deals with security for setgid + scoreboard files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 2 17:53:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2006 13:53:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193894] Review Request: ant-contrib - A collection of tasks for Ant In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609021753.k82Hrop8025113@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ant-contrib - A collection of tasks for Ant https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193894 ------- Additional Comments From ifoox at redhat.com 2006-09-02 13:53 EST ------- After a long delay I was planning to build this package but ran into another problem, maybe someone here will be able to figure out what's going on. Here is the new src.rpm: http://people.redhat.com/ifoox/extras/ant-contrib-1.0-0.3.b2.src.rpm When I run rpmlint on the resulting binary I get the following warning: W: ant-contrib unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib/gcj/ant-contrib/ant-contrib-1.0.jar.so I'm not really sure why rpmbuild is not stripping this object as always, and also doesn't produce a -debuginfo pacakge. Any suggestions? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 2 17:54:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2006 13:54:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202006] Review Request: fmio - FM radio card manipulation utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609021754.k82HsNCW025147@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fmio - FM radio card manipulation utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202006 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |kevin at tummy.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-09-02 13:54 EST ------- OK - Package name OK - Spec file matches base package name. OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines. OK - License (BSD) OK - License field in spec matches See below - License file included in package OK - Spec in American English OK - Spec is legible. OK - Sources match upstream md5sum: 3eb91258db51e7ab78e2d4a8c2c31037 fmio-2.0.8.tar.gz 3eb91258db51e7ab78e2d4a8c2c31037 fmio-2.0.8.tar.gz.1 fe74b5965f6a27b1d91d481705a926d0 fmio-gq-wrapper.py fe74b5965f6a27b1d91d481705a926d0 fmio-gq-wrapper.py.1 OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch. OK - BuildRequires correct OK - Spec has needed ldconfig in post and postun OK - Package owns all the directories it creates. OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files. OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. OK - Package has a correct %clean section. OK - Spec has consistant macro usage. OK - Package is code or permissible content. OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime. OK - Headers/static libs in -devel subpackage. See below - .so files in -devel subpackage. OK - -devel package Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. See below - No rpmlint output. SHOULD Items: See below - Should include License or ask upstream to include it. OK - Should build in mock. Issues: 1. Might see if the upstream could include a copy of the license with the package (although development seems pretty stalled). Any chance of upstream taking any of your patches and doing a new release? 2. You use %makeinstall, can you change to make install DESTDIR=%{buildroot} See: http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head- fcaf3e6fcbd51194a5d0dbcfbdd2fcb7791dd002 3. rpmlint says: W: fmio unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib/libradio.so Permissions are wrong on that file. It's 644, but should be 755? W: fmio no-soname /usr/lib/libradio.so This would be good to fix, but might be a pretty big patch. W: fmio strange-permission fmio-gq-wrapper.py 0755 This can probibly be ignored. W: fmio mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs This would be good to fix. Use either spaces or tabs in the spec. W: fmio-devel no-documentation Can be ignored. W: fmio-wmfmio non-conffile-in-etc /etc/wmfmiorc Should mark that file as %config ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 2 18:01:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2006 14:01:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 195871] Review Request: obmenu In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609021801.k82I1k2s025370@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: obmenu https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195871 peter at thecodergeek.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From peter at thecodergeek.com 2006-09-02 14:01 EST ------- Built for devel; branch requested for FC-5. Thanks for the review! (As an aside, I've received a reply from the upstream author that the next release will feature code attempting to automagically create the user's configuration directory and copy the default menu.xml to it if it does not yet exist. Yay!) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 2 18:03:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2006 14:03:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193894] Review Request: ant-contrib - A collection of tasks for Ant In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609021803.k82I3Nbf025459@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ant-contrib - A collection of tasks for Ant https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193894 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-09-02 14:02 EST ------- Check the permissions on that file. They must be 755 on a dynamic lib for rpm to properly strip/create debuginfo. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 2 18:06:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2006 14:06:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205031] New: Review Request: python-telepathy - Python libraries for Telepathy Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205031 Summary: Review Request: python-telepathy - Python libraries for Telepathy Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: bdpepple at ameritech.net QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://piedmont.homelinux.org/fedora/telepathy/python-telepathy.spec SRPM URL: http://piedmont.homelinux.org/fedora/telepathy/python-telepathy-0.13.2-1.src.rpm Description: Python libraries for use in Telepathy clients and connection managers. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 2 18:15:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2006 14:15:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205030] Review Request: atomix - Little mind game where you have to build molecules out of atoms lying around In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609021815.k82IFJuF025890@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: atomix - Little mind game where you have to build molecules out of atoms lying around https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205030 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-09-02 14:14 EST ------- You're missing find-langs from the spec file - there are a lot of translation files in there. rpmlint throws up two errors for the rpm package zero-length /var/lib/games/atomix.scores non-standard-executable-perm /usr/bin/atomix 02755 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 2 18:15:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2006 14:15:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196120] Review Request: gresistor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609021815.k82IFRgu025913@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gresistor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196120 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-09-02 14:15 EST ------- Well, functionally good. I will review this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 2 18:17:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2006 14:17:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196120] Review Request: gresistor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609021817.k82IHcU4026057@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gresistor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196120 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 2 18:35:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2006 14:35:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201149] Review Request: Flexible WebServer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609021835.k82IZqZS027296@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Flexible WebServer Alias: Cherokee https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201149 ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2006-09-02 14:35 EST ------- Which is the most recent spec and/or srpm? As a reviewer I much prefer a full spec or srpm to download either an updated attachment or external URL. Your comment has make CFLAGS="-O0 -g3" commented out but the attached srpm does not. If at all possible I don't want to have to apply spec patches before reviewing. Why do you redefine Docdir? If it is a legacy from the existing spec you should be able to remove it. Please make Source0 point to a URL where the tarball can be downloaded. Build fails in %prep at the gzip line: "gzip: %SOURCE.gz: No such file or directory" %setup macro makes the gzip line after it redundant anyway, the setup macro should decompress sources. (At least it does when your source has the Source0 tag.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 2 18:57:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2006 14:57:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201149] Review Request: Flexible WebServer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609021857.k82Iv3Hs028784@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Flexible WebServer Alias: Cherokee https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201149 ------- Additional Comments From manuel at todo-linux.com 2006-09-02 14:57 EST ------- (In reply to comment #11) > Which is the most recent spec and/or srpm? As a reviewer I much prefer a full > spec or srpm to download either an updated attachment or external URL. The latest spec file is here: http://manuel.todo-linux.com/cherokee/spec/cherokee.spec And SRPM is also at: http://manuel.todo-linux.com/cherokee/srpm/cherokee-0.5.4-22.1.src.rpm >Your comment has make CFLAGS="-O0 -g3" commented out but the attached srpm does not. You're right. After some talkings with other cherokee developers, we would like to use CFLAGS, because we think that it's a good idea to compile Cherokee with debug info. So I have delete the comment therefore, make CFLAGS is alive again. > If at all possible I don't want to have to apply spec patches before >reviewing. Roger. > > Why do you redefine Docdir? If it is a legacy from the existing spec you should > be able to remove it. Ok I'm going to remove it. > > Please make Source0 point to a URL where the tarball can be downloaded. > Done Thank you very much John. I tought that this ticket would die because of that, I've been working with this spec and no new versions have been uploaded to my server. Hope we can work hard to be successful with this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 2 19:14:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2006 15:14:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205032] New: Review Request: perl-Test-AutoBuild - a framework for continuous, unatttended software builds Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205032 Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-AutoBuild - a framework for continuous, unatttended software builds Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: berrange at redhat.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://berrange.com/~dan/fedora-review/perl-Test-AutoBuild/Test-AutoBuild.spec SRPM URL: http://berrange.com/~dan/fedora-review/perl-Test-AutoBuild/perl-Test-AutoBuild-1.2.0-1.src.rpm Description: Test-AutoBuild is a Perl framework for performing continuous, unattended, automated software builds. It is targetted at upstream developers, rather than package distributors. It provides a workflow engine for performing continuous integration. It checks source out of an SCM repository; then builds it, tests it, installs it & packages it; Finally it publishes any build artifacts, build logs, code reports, packages & HTML status pages to HTTP/FTP site. This is repeated 24x7, scheduled via cron. The core of software is written in Perl, but it calls out to command line utils for integration with a variety of SCM systems. The SCM systems supported are CVS, GNU Arch, Subversion, Mercurial, SVK and Perforce. The spec file is setup such that the modules for each SCM system are provided in separate sub-RPMs. This split was repeatedly requested by users, since if they're using one SCM system (eg Subversion), they did not want to have to install the other 6 SCM systems & their huge dependancy chains. In addition to the sub-RPMs for each SCM system, there is one further sub-RPM called '-account'. This creates a user account 'builder' and a directory structure under '/var/lib/builder' populated with all the files neccessary to get an instance of the autobuild engine up & running. rpmlint will flag files in this sub-RPM as using a non-standard user account, however, this user account is created in the %post script of the sub-RPM. cf. mock RPM creating its own group & directory in /var/lib/mock. I have also patched the upstream tar.gz to remove the module which calls 'yum-arch' since this no longer appears to be distributed in Fedora. This is my second Fedora Extras submission, although I still need sponsership. My other submission is bug 205029 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 2 19:15:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2006 15:15:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205032] Review Request: perl-Test-AutoBuild - a framework for continuous, unatttended software builds In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609021915.k82JF4nL029370@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-AutoBuild - a framework for continuous, unatttended software builds https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205032 berrange at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 2 19:25:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2006 15:25:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204343] Review Request: qcomicbook - a comic book viewing program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609021925.k82JPMtc029774@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qcomicbook - a comic book viewing program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204343 jpmahowald at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jpmahowald at gmail.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2006-09-02 15:25 EST ------- + Built and run on fc5 x86_64. Also built on fc6 x86_64. + Sucessfully extracted .tar.gz, .tar.bz, and .zip files. + I agree with comment 6 - It does not appear in my Gnome menus for some reason. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 2 19:29:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2006 15:29:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189315] Review Request: ardour In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609021929.k82JTrOe029912@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ardour https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189315 seg at haxxed.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From seg at haxxed.com 2006-09-02 15:29 EST ------- As discussed in IRC, move the desktop file out of the spec before import and this is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 2 19:32:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2006 15:32:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204164] Review Request: perl-LWP-Authen-Wsse - Library for enabling X-WSSE authentication in LWP In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609021932.k82JWGZ7030025@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-LWP-Authen-Wsse - Library for enabling X-WSSE authentication in LWP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204164 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-09-02 15:32 EST ------- I'll assume that the BuildRequires: perl(Digest::SHA1) is added to the spec for the purposes of this review. * source files match upstream: d611b72884406ed92b7920be76bb3a94 LWP-Authen-Wsse-0.05.tar.gz * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * dist tag is present. * build root is correct. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. License text not included upstream. * latest version is being packaged. O BuildRequires are proper (BR: perl is not necessary; assuming BR: perl(Digest::SHA1) is there). * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: perl(LWP::Authen::Wsse) perl-LWP-Authen-Wsse = 0.05-1.fc6 = perl >= 0:5.004 perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8) perl(Digest::SHA1) perl(English) perl(MIME::Base64) perl(constant) perl(strict) perl(warnings) * %check is present and the single test passes: All tests successful. Files=1, Tests=1, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.01 cusr + 0.02 csys = 0.03 CPU) * package is not relocatable. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no libtool .la droppings. APPROVED, assuming you add that missing BR. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 2 19:41:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2006 15:41:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204439] Review Request: perl-POE-Component-SimpleDBI - Asynchronous non-blocking DBI calls in POE made simple In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609021941.k82Jfp1N030343@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-POE-Component-SimpleDBI - Asynchronous non-blocking DBI calls in POE made simple https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204439 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 2 19:42:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2006 15:42:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204177] Review Request: digikam-doc - digiKam and Showfoto documentation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609021942.k82Jgc6x030418@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: digikam-doc - digiKam and Showfoto documentation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204177 mgarski at post.pl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From mgarski at post.pl 2006-09-02 15:42 EST ------- I'm not official reviewer and I didn't review any package, so I'll have to dig through documentation and see how things are working, then I could review your package :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 2 19:50:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2006 15:50:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205030] Review Request: atomix - Little mind game where you have to build molecules out of atoms lying around In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609021950.k82JoFFk030609@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: atomix - Little mind game where you have to build molecules out of atoms lying around https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205030 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-09-02 15:50 EST ------- builds fine in mock with no real hiccups. rpmlint obviously gives the same results. As soon as you fix the two errors from rpmlint and address #1, I'll do the full review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 2 19:52:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2006 15:52:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205029] Review Request: autobuild-applet - a GNOME applet for monitoring Test-AutoBuild build status In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609021952.k82JqP0V030668@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: autobuild-applet - a GNOME applet for monitoring Test-AutoBuild build status https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205029 ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at ameritech.net 2006-09-02 15:52 EST ------- Couple of quick items: 1. Desktop file is incorrectly handled. Refer to http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-254ddf07aae20a23ced8cecc219d8f73926e9755 2. Duplicate BuildRequires: gtk2-devel (provided by libgnomeui-devel) 3. Unnecessary Requires: python, libgnome, libgnomeui. sonames from devel packages should pull these in. 4. Missing necessary requires on GConf for schemas installation, and probably should use the standard gconf scriptlets for FE packages. Refer to http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets?action=show&redirect=ScriptletSnippets#head-6c2101d8f810cc95c677c8c27f43573b0bc23cb1 Minor: 1. Preferred buildroot. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-f196e7b2477c2f5dd97ef64e8eacddfb517f1aa1 If I get some free time this weekend I'll try to do a more formal review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 2 19:55:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2006 15:55:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205030] Review Request: atomix - Little mind game where you have to build molecules out of atoms lying around In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609021955.k82JtqJ3030787@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: atomix - Little mind game where you have to build molecules out of atoms lying around https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205030 ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2006-09-02 15:55 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > You're missing find-langs from the spec file - there are a lot of translation > files in there. > > rpmlint throws up two errors for the rpm package > > zero-length /var/lib/games/atomix.scores The directory /var/lib/games is not writable by the 'games' group. In order for the application to write to its own scoreboard file, it must create the scoreboard file (and make it group writable) as part of the install process. This is acceptable. > non-standard-executable-perm /usr/bin/atomix 02755 This is acceptable for a game that is setgid 'games' for writing to a shared scoreboard file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 2 20:01:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2006 16:01:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193894] Review Request: ant-contrib - A collection of tasks for Ant In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609022001.k82K14k7030888@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ant-contrib - A collection of tasks for Ant https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193894 ------- Additional Comments From ifoox at redhat.com 2006-09-02 16:00 EST ------- $ ll /var/tmp/ant-contrib-1.0-0.3.b2-root-ifoox/usr/lib/gcj/ant-contrib/ant-contrib-1.0.jar.so -rwxr-xr-x 1 ifoox ifoox 1356724 Sep 2 15:53 /var/tmp/ant-contrib-1.0-0.3.b2-root-ifoox/usr/lib/gcj/ant-contrib/ant-contrib-1.0.jar.so So it looks like valid 755 permissions. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 2 20:05:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2006 16:05:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 182175] Review Request: libast - handy routines and drop-in substitutes for some good-but-non-portable functions (needed by eterm) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609022005.k82K5Ts0031006@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libast - handy routines and drop-in substitutes for some good-but-non-portable functions (needed by eterm) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=182175 terjeros at phys.ntnu.no changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |NEW Keywords| |Reopened Resolution|WONTFIX | ------- Additional Comments From terjeros at phys.ntnu.no 2006-09-02 16:05 EST ------- (In reply to comment #17) > Sorry, should've specified. libast 0.7.1 in CVS has a LICENSE file. You can > pull the tarball from the cAos SRPM if you'd like: > http://mirror.caosity.org/cAos-2/ext/autobuilder/i386/00_LOGS/e/libast/SRPMS/libast-0.7.1-0.20060818.src.rpm Thanks, new package available: SPEC: http://web.phys.ntnu.no/~terjeros/eterm/libast.spec SRPM: http://web.phys.ntnu.no/~terjeros/eterm/libast-0.7.1-0.1.20060818cvs.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 2 20:05:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2006 16:05:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 182173] Review Request: eterm - a color vt102 terminal emulator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609022005.k82K5pWI031035@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eterm - a color vt102 terminal emulator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=182173 Bug 182173 depends on bug 182175, which changed state. Bug 182175 Summary: Review Request: libast - handy routines and drop-in substitutes for some good-but-non-portable functions (needed by eterm) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=182175 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|WONTFIX | Status|CLOSED |NEW -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 2 20:14:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2006 16:14:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204439] Review Request: perl-POE-Component-SimpleDBI - Asynchronous non-blocking DBI calls in POE made simple In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609022014.k82KEJYU031231@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-POE-Component-SimpleDBI - Asynchronous non-blocking DBI calls in POE made simple https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204439 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-09-02 16:14 EST ------- Another standard spanspec-generated Perl package; no surprises here. * source files match upstream: a1c287b5297ceef014910722f3ce8b3f POE-Component-SimpleDBI-1.12.tar.gz * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * dist tag is present. * build root is correct. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. License text not included upstream. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: perl(POE::Component::SimpleDBI) = 1.12 perl(POE::Component::SimpleDBI::SubProcess) = 1.09 perl-POE-Component-SimpleDBI = 1.12-1.fc6 = perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8) perl(Carp) perl(DBI) perl(Error) perl(POE) perl(POE::Filter::Line) perl(POE::Filter::Reference) perl(POE::Session) perl(POE::Wheel::Run) perl(strict) perl(warnings) * %check is present and all tests pass: All tests successful. Files=1, Tests=2, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.10 cusr + 0.04 csys = 0.14 CPU) * package is not relocatable. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no libtool .la droppings. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 2 20:26:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2006 16:26:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 181035] Review Request: luks-tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609022026.k82KQuXt031574@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: luks-tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=181035 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |Jochen at herr-schmitt.de ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-09-02 16:26 EST ------- Hey Jochen. You moved this to FE-REVIEW, but didn't assign it to yourself. I am doing that now. If you are not going to review this, go ahead and reassign to nobody at fedoraproject.org and set it back to block FE-NEW. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 2 20:27:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2006 16:27:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205030] Review Request: atomix - Little mind game where you have to build molecules out of atoms lying around In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609022027.k82KRj73031606@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: atomix - Little mind game where you have to build molecules out of atoms lying around https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205030 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-09-02 16:27 EST ------- Okay, give #4 Review ------ Good : Spec file readable and in US English No ownership problems with directories No devel package (so that bit can be ignored!) Upstream md5sum = package md5sum Builds cleanly in mock (i386) No dupes in rpms Package includes documentation Correctly creates it's own localdir instead of polluting Consistent use of macros Uses dist and smp_flags Software actually works No suprious permissions in the rpms Needs work Needs to include find-lang Once the needs work has been attended to, I'm happy for this to go in. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 2 20:37:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2006 16:37:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188435] Review Request: glibrary-1.0.1 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609022037.k82Kb5Ef031954@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glibrary-1.0.1 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188435 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-09-02 16:36 EST ------- This package is APPROVED, but I don't see that it's been imported/built. Please import and close this bug with NEXTRELEASE. (You should probibly make sure you own the datadir/name as mentioned in comment #4. as well) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 2 20:38:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2006 16:38:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187236] Review Request: smixer - A simple interface to /dev/mixer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609022038.k82KcXkT032030@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: smixer - A simple interface to /dev/mixer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187236 opensource at till.name changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |nobody at fedoraproject.org CC| |opensource at till.name OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |201449 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From opensource at till.name 2006-09-02 16:38 EST ------- Because there was no response from the reporter for nearly 5 months closed this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 2 20:41:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2006 16:41:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190144] Review Request: hevea - LaTeX to HTML translator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609022041.k82KfRaQ032128@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hevea - LaTeX to HTML translator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190144 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-09-02 16:41 EST ------- It might be more clear to submit a new bug for the documentation issue, perhaps new 'hevea-docs' package submission? Folks looking at this without reading might assume since the package was APPROVED that the question about the docs is moot. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 2 20:41:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2006 16:41:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197814] Review Request: autogen In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609022041.k82KfwkB032167@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: autogen https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197814 paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|Jochen at herr-schmitt.de |nobody at fedoraproject.org OtherBugsDependingO|163778, 189685 |163776 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-09-02 16:41 EST ------- I'm moving this back to FE-NEW as the original reviewer has vanished without trace. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 2 20:42:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2006 16:42:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189685] Review Request: Anjuta-2.0.x In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609022042.k82KgC38032203@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Anjuta-2.0.x https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189685 paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn|197814 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 2 20:45:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2006 16:45:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190156] Review Request: php-pear-HTTP In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609022045.k82Kjpu3032398@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-HTTP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190156 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-09-02 16:45 EST ------- Looks like the guidelines got finalized and this package was built and pushed out. I am going to close this NEXTRELEASE. Feel free to re-open if I am doing so in error. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 2 20:49:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2006 16:49:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191389] Review Request: oooqs2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609022049.k82KnaTI032475@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: oooqs2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191389 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-09-02 16:49 EST ------- This package was imported, but doesn't seem to have been built yet. Is there a issue with the build? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 2 20:53:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2006 16:53:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 174021] Review Request: aplus-fsf - Advanced APL Interpreter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609022053.k82KrH5X032611@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aplus-fsf - Advanced APL Interpreter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174021 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-09-02 16:53 EST ------- This package was approved and imported and built. This bugzilla ticket should be closed as NEXTRELEASE. Bugs in this package should be filed against the aplus-fsf componet in bugzilla directly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 2 20:56:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2006 16:56:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188461] Review Request: xmms-musepack - Mpegplus (mpc) playback plugin for XMMS In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609022056.k82KuYHL000303@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xmms-musepack - Mpegplus (mpc) playback plugin for XMMS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188461 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-09-02 16:56 EST ------- This package has been imported and built. Can this request be closed NEXTRELEASE? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 2 20:59:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2006 16:59:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202457] Review Request: crack-attack - Puzzle action game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609022059.k82Kxll2000400@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: crack-attack - Puzzle action game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202457 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-09-02 16:59 EST ------- It's been almost a week, and I have seen no sign of objection on the fedora- games-list (from looking at the archives at least). I would expect someone would have spoken up by now if there were objections... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 2 21:02:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2006 17:02:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 182254] Review Request: SS5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609022102.k82L2nR1000515@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: SS5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=182254 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-09-02 17:02 EST ------- Since this package has been imported and released, can we close this request as NEXTRELEASE? Additional support can be found on the extras-list, via email with your sponsor, or on the #fedora-extras irc channel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 2 21:18:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2006 17:18:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204162] Review Request: perl-Heap - Perl extension for keeping data partially sorted In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609022118.k82LI9x9001153@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Heap - Perl extension for keeping data partially sorted https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204162 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kevin at tummy.com ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-09-02 17:17 EST ------- Whats the status of this package? I don't see it on CVSSyncNeeded any longer, but its still doesn't have CVS devel files or a owners.list entry. Can you just try importing it again over the old removed devel branch? It looks like the files were totally removed from CVS, even the old revisions... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 2 21:25:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2006 17:25:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204162] Review Request: perl-Heap - Perl extension for keeping data partially sorted In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609022125.k82LPmx6001319@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Heap - Perl extension for keeping data partially sorted https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204162 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-09-02 17:25 EST ------- Oops. I just typoed. The old revsions are there just fine. cvs co perl-Heap cvs co -r perl-Heap-0_71-1 perl-Heap/devel/ For more information on using the Fedora source code repositories, please visit http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UsingCvs U perl-Heap/devel/.cvsignore U perl-Heap/devel/Makefile U perl-Heap/devel/perl-Heap.spec U perl-Heap/devel/sources Now you have the last revision from cvs. Import your changes and check in, and don't forget to add to owners.list. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 2 21:31:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2006 17:31:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204598] Review Request: geda-gschem - Electronics schematics editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609022131.k82LVA7d001478@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: geda-gschem - Electronics schematics editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204598 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2006-09-02 17:30 EST ------- Updated: Spec URL: http://chitlesh.googlepages.com/geda-gschem.spec SRPM URL: http://chitlesh.googlepages.com/geda-gschem-20060123-6.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 2 21:41:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2006 17:41:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205040] New: Review Request: geda-gnetlist - Netlister for the gEDA project Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205040 Summary: Review Request: geda-gnetlist - Netlister for the gEDA project Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cgoorah at yahoo.com.au QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://chitlesh.funpic.de/rpm/geda-gnetlist.spec SRPM URL: http://chitlesh.funpic.de/rpm/geda-gnetlist-20060123-3.src.rpm Description: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 2 21:44:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2006 17:44:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205040] Review Request: geda-gnetlist - Netlister for the gEDA project In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609022144.k82Li35I002099@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: geda-gnetlist - Netlister for the gEDA project https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205040 cgoorah at yahoo.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |wk at ire.pw.edu.pl ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2006-09-02 17:44 EST ------- *** Bug 177113 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 2 21:43:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2006 17:43:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177113] Review Request: geda-gnetlist - netlist generator for gEDA circuit design software In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609022143.k82LhpIQ002082@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: geda-gnetlist - netlist generator for gEDA circuit design software https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177113 cgoorah at yahoo.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|WONTFIX |DUPLICATE ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2006-09-02 17:43 EST ------- http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/Policy/StalledReviews *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 205040 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 2 21:45:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2006 17:45:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205040] Review Request: geda-gnetlist - Netlister for the gEDA project In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609022145.k82LjCiG002146@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: geda-gnetlist - Netlister for the gEDA project https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205040 cgoorah at yahoo.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2006-09-02 17:45 EST ------- %description Gnetlist generates netlists from schematics drawn with gschem (the gEDA schematic editor). Possible output formats are: - native - tango - spice - allegro - PCB - verilog and others. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 2 21:58:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2006 17:58:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205041] New: Review Request: tellico - collection manager Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205041 Summary: Review Request: tellico - collection manager Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jamatos at fc.up.pt QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.fc.up.pt/pessoas/jamatos/fedora-extras/tellico.spec SRPM URL: http://www.fc.up.pt/pessoas/jamatos/fedora-extras/tellico-1.2-1.src.rpm Description: Tellico is a collection manager for KDE. It includes default collections for books, bibliographies, comic books, videos, music, coins, stamps, trading cards, and wines, and also allows custom collections. Unlimited user-defined fields are allowed. Filters are available to limit the visible entries by definable criteria. Full customization for printing is possible through editing the default XSLT file. It can import CSV, Bibtex, and Bibtexml and export CSV, HTML, Bibtex, Bibtexml, and PilotDB. Entries may be imported directly from Amazon.com. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 2 22:04:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2006 18:04:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205043] New: Review Request: geda-gattrib - Attribute editor for gEDA Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205043 Summary: Review Request: geda-gattrib - Attribute editor for gEDA Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cgoorah at yahoo.com.au QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://chitlesh.funpic.de/rpm/geda-gattrib.spec SRPM URL: http://chitlesh.funpic.de/rpm/geda-gattrib-20060123-3.src.rpm Description: Gattrib is gEDA's attribute editor. It reads a set of gschem .sch files (schematic files), and creates a spreadsheet showing all components in rows, with the associated component attributes listed in the columns. It allows the user to add, modify, or delete component attributes outside of gschem, and then save the .sch files back out. When it is completed, it will allow the user to edit attributes attached to components, nets, and pins. (Currently, only component attribute editing is implemented; pin attributes are displayed only, and net attributes are TBD.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 2 22:06:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2006 18:06:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205029] Review Request: autobuild-applet - a GNOME applet for monitoring Test-AutoBuild build status In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609022206.k82M6DT3002732@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: autobuild-applet - a GNOME applet for monitoring Test-AutoBuild build status https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205029 ------- Additional Comments From berrange at redhat.com 2006-09-02 18:06 EST ------- Updated SRPM at http://berrange.com/~dan/fedora-review/autobuild-applet/autobuild-applet-1.0.3-2.src.rpm Updated SPEC at http://berrange.com/~dan/fedora-review/autobuild-applet/autobuild-applet.spec Addressed the issues: 1. Fixed the desktop file handling to be compliant with standards 2. Remove duplicate buildrequires 3. Removed the unnecessary requires 4. Added missing requires on gconf & missing pre/preun scripts to comply with standards. NB, I didn't put in the 'killall -HUP gconfd-2' bit, because according to bug 173869 this should no longer be needed 5. Fixed up BuildRoot tag. I also added patch to deal with a gconf handling bug in upstream autobuild-applet sources which was exposed when I tested on FC6test2. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 2 22:06:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2006 18:06:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205043] Review Request: geda-gattrib - Attribute editor for gEDA In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609022206.k82M6qb9002765@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: geda-gattrib - Attribute editor for gEDA https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205043 cgoorah at yahoo.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |wk at ire.pw.edu.pl ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2006-09-02 18:06 EST ------- *** Bug 177413 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 2 22:06:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2006 18:06:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177413] Review Request: geda-gattrib - attribute editor for gEDA project In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609022206.k82M6pXm002753@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: geda-gattrib - attribute editor for gEDA project https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177413 cgoorah at yahoo.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|WONTFIX |DUPLICATE ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2006-09-02 18:06 EST ------- http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/Policy/StalledReviews *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 205043 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 2 22:25:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2006 18:25:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205040] Review Request: geda-gnetlist - Netlister for the gEDA project In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609022225.k82MPF0d003148@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: geda-gnetlist - Netlister for the gEDA project https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205040 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2006-09-02 18:25 EST ------- Usage: view the schema gschem /usr/share/gEDA/examples/stack_1.sch convert the schema into a netlist gnetlist -g geda -o stack.net /usr/share/gEDA/examples/stack_1.sch kwrite/gedit stack.net -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 2 22:28:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2006 18:28:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188461] Review Request: xmms-musepack - Mpegplus (mpc) playback plugin for XMMS In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609022228.k82MSFec003242@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xmms-musepack - Mpegplus (mpc) playback plugin for XMMS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188461 matthias at rpmforge.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From matthias at rpmforge.net 2006-09-02 18:28 EST ------- Strange... I could have sworn I had closed it. Sorry, done now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 2 23:54:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2006 19:54:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204258] Review Request: mousepad - A simple text editor for Xfce In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609022354.k82NsMF8005441@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mousepad - A simple text editor for Xfce https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204258 fedora at christoph-wickert.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From fedora at christoph-wickert.de 2006-09-02 19:54 EST ------- REVIEW for 3e94740de010b2285fc8711336538fe6 mousepad-0.2.6-2.fc6.src.rpm MUST items: OK - rpmlint quite on all packages OK - package meets naming guidelines OK - spec file meets naming guidelines OK - package meets package guidelines OK - license open-source compatible (GPL) OK - license in specfile matches actual license OK - license included in %doc OK - spec file in American English OK - spec file is legible OK - source in SRPM matches upstream source (md5 f8c23b1de6d23927729c477689883c38) OK - package builds on i386 OK - all build dependencies listed BuildRequires OK - none of the exceptions of packaging guidelines in BuildRequires OK - locales handled correctly with %find_lang OK - no shared libs OK - package is not relocatable OK - package owns all directories that it creates OK - no duplicate files in %files section OK - permissions and %defattr correct OK - clean section with "rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT" present OK - macro usage consistent OK - code, not content OK - no large docs OK - docs don't affect runtime OK - no headers or static libs OK - no pkgconfig files OK - no libtool archives OK - mousepad.desktop included and correctly installed OK - package doesn't own files/directories owned by other packages SHOULD items: OK - package builds in mock (Core 5 and 6) OK - package functions as described OK - mime type correctly installed with scriptlet from wiki OK - package uses disttag APPROVED Note: Don't forget Requires(post): desktop-file-utils Requires(postun): desktop-file-utils if you are planning to build this for Core 4 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 3 00:07:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2006 20:07:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203662] Review Request: dx - Open source version of IBM's Visualization Data Explorer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609030007.k8307hco005846@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dx - Open source version of IBM's Visualization Data Explorer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203662 ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2006-09-02 20:07 EST ------- http://rpm.greysector.net/extras/dx.spec http://rpm.greysector.net/extras/dx-4.4.0-3.src.rpm - removed -samples, will package separately - disable java parts completely for now - fixed build on fc6 - moved non-binary stuff to _datadir -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 3 00:11:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2006 20:11:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205057] New: Review Request: dx-samples - OpenDX Examples Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205057 Summary: Review Request: dx-samples - OpenDX Examples Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rpm at greysector.net QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://rpm.greysector.net/extras/dx-samples.spec SRPM URL: http://rpm.greysector.net/extras/dx-samples-4.4.0-1.src.rpm Description: Example files and tutorials for OpenDX. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 3 00:12:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2006 20:12:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205057] Review Request: dx-samples - OpenDX Examples In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609030012.k830CVnF005994@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dx-samples - OpenDX Examples https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205057 rpm at greysector.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |203662 ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2006-09-02 20:12 EST ------- Note: this depends on dx, which is under review in bug 203662. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 3 00:12:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2006 20:12:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203662] Review Request: dx - Open source version of IBM's Visualization Data Explorer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609030012.k830CgTF006009@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dx - Open source version of IBM's Visualization Data Explorer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203662 rpm at greysector.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |205057 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 3 00:21:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2006 20:21:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205057] Review Request: dx-samples - OpenDX Examples In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609030021.k830L2m5006154@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dx-samples - OpenDX Examples https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205057 paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 3 00:26:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2006 20:26:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193059] Review Request: ibmasm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609030026.k830QwNC006333@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ibmasm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193059 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-09-02 20:26 EST ------- Builds cleanly, rpmlint complains on the -devel package W: summary-ended-with-dot E: summary-too-long W: no-docs (not worried by) E: script-without-shellbank %{_includedir}/ibmasm/rsa.h and libibmasm.h The errors need fixing (the last one is probably just a case of setting the permission to 644 for each file) Not building in mock Executing /usr/sbin/mock-helper chroot /var/lib/mock/fedora-development-i386-core/root /sbin/runuser - root -c "/sbin/runuser -c 'rpmbuild -ba --target i386 --nodeps /builddir/build/SPECS/ibmasm.spec' mockbuild" error: File /builddir/build/SOURCES/ibmasm_user_3.0-9.fc6.tar.bz2: No such file or directory (this could well be my system, but it's working on other packages correctly) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 3 00:39:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2006 20:39:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197814] Review Request: autogen In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609030039.k830dodV006661@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: autogen https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197814 rpm at greysector.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |rpm at greysector.net OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 3 00:59:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2006 20:59:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197814] Review Request: autogen In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609030059.k830xUm8007132@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: autogen https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197814 ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2006-09-02 20:59 EST ------- A few quick notes before I start a formal review: 1. $ rpmbuild -bi autogen.spec error: bad date in %changelog: Say Aug 26 2006 Paul F. Johnson 5.8.5-3 Should be "Sat", I think. After fixing that, I still can't build it: $ rpmbuild -bi autogen.spec error: Failed build dependencies: libopts-devel is needed by autogen-5.8.5-3.x86_64 # yum install libopts-devel [...] No Match for argument: libopts-devel 2. BuildRequires: guile-devel, libxml2-devel, libopts-devel libtool Please don't mix commas and spaces for separators. 3. No %{_smp_mflags} in make invocations and no comment why it should be omitted. 4. mv %{buildroot}/%{_bindir}/columns %{buildroot}/%{_bindir}/autogen.columns mv %{buildroot}/%{_bindir}/getdefs %{buildroot}/%{_bindir}/autogen.getdefs I think the convention is to use $file.$alternative-package, not $alternative-package.$file. See postfix and sendmail. 5. %description AutoGen is a tool designed to simplify the creation and maintenance of programes that contain large amounts of repetitious text. ^^^^^^^^^ Should be "programs", I think. 6. %description devel Development files for autogen Description doesn't end with a full stop. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 3 01:39:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2006 21:39:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191389] Review Request: oooqs2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609030139.k831djWu008204@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: oooqs2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191389 ------- Additional Comments From dennis at ausil.us 2006-09-02 21:39 EST ------- ppc build failed and i havent had a chance to work out why yet. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 3 01:49:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2006 21:49:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205059] New: Review Request: perl-POE-Filter-Zlib - POE filter wrapped around Compress::Zlib Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205059 Summary: Review Request: perl-POE-Filter-Zlib - POE filter wrapped around Compress::Zlib Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/POE-Filter-Zlib/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com SRPM URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-POE-Filter-Zlib-1.4-1.fc5.src.rpm SPEC URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-POE-Filter-Zlib.spec Description: POE::Filter::Zlib provides a POE filter for performing compression and uncompression using Compress::Zlib. It is suitable for use with POE::Filter::Stackable. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 3 01:49:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2006 21:49:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205059] Review Request: perl-POE-Filter-Zlib - POE filter wrapped around Compress::Zlib In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609030149.k831nlxf008478@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-POE-Filter-Zlib - POE filter wrapped around Compress::Zlib https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205059 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |163776 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 3 03:30:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2006 23:30:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198830] Review Request: libmodelfile - library for accessing WorldForge model files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609030330.k833U3Mj010320@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libmodelfile - library for accessing WorldForge model files Alias: libmodelfile https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198830 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 3 03:31:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2006 23:31:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202853] Review Request: wfut - WorldForge media updater tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609030331.k833VliU010403@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wfut - WorldForge media updater tool Alias: wfut https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202853 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |chris.stone at gmail.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 3 03:35:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2006 23:35:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204258] Review Request: mousepad - A simple text editor for Xfce In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609030335.k833ZMdH010543@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mousepad - A simple text editor for Xfce https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204258 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-09-02 23:35 EST ------- Thanks for the review. Imported and built for devel. 15890 (mousepad): Build on target fedora-development-extras succeeded. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 3 04:09:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Sep 2006 00:09:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201873] Review Request: wmix - Dockapp mixer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609030409.k8349c3m011203@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wmix - Dockapp mixer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201873 ------- Additional Comments From jtorresh at gmail.com 2006-09-03 00:09 EST ------- Hey Patrice, I see you've imported wmix into cvs. Please don't forget to close this bug as NEXTRELEASE when the package is built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 3 04:18:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Sep 2006 00:18:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205060] New: Review Request: perl-Sub-Name - Name -- or rename -- a sub Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205060 Summary: Review Request: perl-Sub-Name - Name -- or rename -- a sub Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Sub-Name/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com SRPM URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-Sub-Name-0.02-1.fc5.src.rpm SPEC URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-Sub-Name.spec Description: This module allows one to "name" or rename subroutines, including anonymous ones. Note that this is mainly for aid in debugging; you still cannot call the sub by the new name (w/o some deep magic). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 3 04:18:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Sep 2006 00:18:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205060] Review Request: perl-Sub-Name - Name -- or rename -- a sub In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609030418.k834IJIG011379@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Sub-Name - Name -- or rename -- a sub https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205060 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |163776 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 3 04:29:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Sep 2006 00:29:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 194027] Review Request: metisse - Experimental X desktop with OpenGL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609030429.k834T8Su011637@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: metisse - Experimental X desktop with OpenGL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194027 ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2006-09-03 00:29 EST ------- I'm orphaning nucleo for FC6 and giving up on metisse. If anyone wants to take this over be my guest. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 3 04:33:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Sep 2006 00:33:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201502] Review Request: php-pear-PhpDocumentor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609030433.k834XtqE011786@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-PhpDocumentor Alias: phpDocumentor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201502 ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2006-09-03 00:33 EST ------- There is a new and improved way to do the setup and build sections, see bug #198706 we are trying to get this into the newrpmspec command. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 3 04:39:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Sep 2006 00:39:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192583] Review Request: php-pear-XML-Parser - XML parsing class based on PHP's bundled expat In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609030439.k834dNVv011988@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-XML-Parser - XML parsing class based on PHP's bundled expat Alias: php-pear-XML-Parser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192583 ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2006-09-03 00:39 EST ------- Hi Remi, can you update the %setup and %install sections to the new cleaner way shown here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=135449 More info at bug #198706 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 3 04:40:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Sep 2006 00:40:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202006] Review Request: fmio - FM radio card manipulation utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609030440.k834evu8012029@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fmio - FM radio card manipulation utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202006 ------- Additional Comments From andy at smile.org.ua 2006-09-03 00:40 EST ------- * Sat Sep 02 2006 Andy Shevchenko 2.0.8-5 - mark wmfmiorc as config - install libradio.so with executable permissions - do not use makeinstall macro - catch up license from fmio.c Updated file here: ftp://andriy.asplinux.com.ua/pub/people/andy/extras/fmio-2.0.8-5.src.rpm P.S. I've sent mail to mainstream about patches and separate License file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 3 04:43:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Sep 2006 00:43:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193867] Review Request: klamav - Clam Anti-Virus on the KDE Desktop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609030443.k834hlRV012107@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: klamav - Clam Anti-Virus on the KDE Desktop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193867 ------- Additional Comments From andy at smile.org.ua 2006-09-03 00:43 EST ------- * Sat Sep 02 2006 Andy Shevchenko 0.38-2 - require freshclam for correct DB update - fix rpmlint claim: - pack ScanWithKlamAV as executable - do not use absolute link - use $RPM_BUILD_ROOT and $RPM_OPT_FLAGS in all places Updated file here: ftp://andriy.asplinux.com.ua/pub/people/andy/extras/klamav-0.38-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 3 04:56:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Sep 2006 00:56:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205040] Review Request: geda-gnetlist - Netlister for the gEDA project In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609030456.k834uPO3012493@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: geda-gnetlist - Netlister for the gEDA project https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205040 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 3 05:06:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Sep 2006 01:06:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205062] New: Review Request: perl-Sub-Install - Install subroutines into packages easily Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205062 Summary: Review Request: perl-Sub-Install - Install subroutines into packages easily Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Sub-Install/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com SRPM URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-Sub-Install-0.922-1.fc5.src.rpm SPEC URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-Sub-Install.spec Description: This module makes it easy to install subroutines into packages without the unslightly mess of no strict or typeglobs lying about where just anyone can see them. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 3 05:06:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Sep 2006 01:06:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205062] Review Request: perl-Sub-Install - Install subroutines into packages easily In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609030506.k8356MZM012729@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Sub-Install - Install subroutines into packages easily https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205062 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |163776 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 3 05:09:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Sep 2006 01:09:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196749] Review Request: php-pecl-xdebug - PECL package for debugging PHP scripts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609030509.k8359sa0012794@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pecl-xdebug - PECL package for debugging PHP scripts Alias: php-pecl-xdebug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196749 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(chris.stone at gmail.| |com) | ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2006-09-03 01:09 EST ------- SPEC: http://tkmame.retrogames.com/fedora-extras/php-pecl-xdebug.spec SRPM: http://tkmame.retrogames.com/fedora-extras/php-pecl-xdebug-2.0.0-beta6.2.src.rpm %changelog * Sat Sep 02 2006 Christopher Stone 2.0.0-beta6.2 - Add -q to %%setup - Update macro definitions to new standard - Require specific api version - Remove requires on php version - Removed macros for system commands -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 3 05:11:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Sep 2006 01:11:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189315] Review Request: ardour In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609030511.k835BPRw012838@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ardour https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189315 green at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From green at redhat.com 2006-09-03 01:11 EST ------- (In reply to comment #16) > As discussed in IRC, move the desktop file out of the spec before import and > this is APPROVED. Thanks. I've submitted this to the build system. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 3 05:14:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Sep 2006 01:14:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204495] Review Request: perl-GStreamer - GStreamer Perl module In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609030514.k835EN1E012947@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-GStreamer - GStreamer Perl module https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204495 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 3 05:14:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Sep 2006 01:14:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204497] Review Request: gmusicbrowser - Jukebox for large collections of audio files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609030514.k835EQkl012963@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gmusicbrowser - Jukebox for large collections of audio files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204497 Bug 204497 depends on bug 204495, which changed state. Bug 204495 Summary: Review Request: perl-GStreamer - GStreamer Perl module https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204495 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 3 05:14:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Sep 2006 01:14:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204439] Review Request: perl-POE-Component-SimpleDBI - Asynchronous non-blocking DBI calls in POE made simple In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609030514.k835EtZJ012987@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-POE-Component-SimpleDBI - Asynchronous non-blocking DBI calls in POE made simple https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204439 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-09-03 01:14 EST ------- +Import to CVS +Add to owners.list +Bump release, build for devel +devel build succeeds +Request branching (FC-5) +Close bug Thanks for the review! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 3 05:26:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Sep 2006 01:26:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187282] Review Request: sax2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609030526.k835QZRr013248@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sax2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187282 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163776 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-09-03 01:26 EST ------- Moving back to FE-NEW since this package isn't under review now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 3 05:34:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Sep 2006 01:34:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202457] Review Request: crack-attack - Puzzle action game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609030534.k835YXWv013436@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: crack-attack - Puzzle action game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202457 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-09-03 01:34 EST ------- Thanks all, Imported and build, closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 3 05:35:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Sep 2006 01:35:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205041] Review Request: tellico - collection manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609030535.k835ZPB8013496@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tellico - collection manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205041 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |kevin at tummy.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-09-03 01:35 EST ------- OK - Package name OK - Spec file matches base package name. OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines. OK - License (GPL) OK - License field in spec matches OK - License file included in package OK - Spec in American English OK - Spec is legible. OK - Sources match upstream md5sum: a7ecc139d820279b0a89d8f594110094 tellico-1.2.tar.gz a7ecc139d820279b0a89d8f594110094 tellico-1.2.tar.gz.1 See below - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch. OK - BuildRequires correct OK - Spec handles locales/find_lang OK - Package owns all the directories it creates. OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files. OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. OK - Package has a correct %clean section. OK - Spec has consistant macro usage. OK - Package is code or permissible content. OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime. OK - Package is a GUI app and has a .desktop file OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. OK - No rpmlint output. SHOULD Items: OK - Should include License or ask upstream to include it. See below - Should build in mock. OK - Should have sane scriptlets. Issues: 1. In your desktop-file-install you have --vendor="", but according to guidelines that should be --vendor=fedora. Also, this causes builds under mock to fail because the fedora-tellio.desktop file doesn't exist. 2. INSTALL NEWS README can probibly all be dropped. INSTALL is the generic auto* install document, NEWS and README are both of size 0. 3. The Summary is a bit generic: Summary: collection manager Perhaps at least add that it's a KDE based collection manager? 4. rpmlint says: W: tellico summary-not-capitalized collection manager So, it should at least be "A KDE collection manager" -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 3 08:12:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Sep 2006 04:12:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204598] Review Request: geda-gschem - Electronics schematics editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609030812.k838CDTC019388@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: geda-gschem - Electronics schematics editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204598 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-09-03 04:11 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=135454) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=135454&action=view) gdb log of gschem Umm... 20060123-6 seems to cause SEGV. Seems 100% reproducible by the following steps. 1. cp /usr/share/gEDA/examples/adders_1.sch to current directory. 2. execute "gschem ./adders_1.sch" 3. Choose "File -> Quit" - Then gschem causes SEGV. I attach gdb log of this. Can you see the reason, or will you contact the upstream about this? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 3 09:05:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Sep 2006 05:05:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197814] Review Request: autogen In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609030905.k8395Uvf006689@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: autogen https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197814 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-09-03 05:05 EST ------- Point by point... 1. libopts-devel is in rawhide extras, no idea why yum didn't pick it up (just checked via ftp incase it's a repo problem) 2. trivial fix 3. Race condition, I'll comment it 4. I ripped the recipe directly from the sendmail spec, so if I'm wrong, so it is! 5 and 6. trivial -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 3 09:10:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Sep 2006 05:10:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197649] Review Request: gnustep-make - GNUstep makefile package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609030910.k839Awsi006866@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnustep-make - GNUstep makefile package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197649 Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net 2006-09-03 05:10 EST ------- Thanks, Dominik. Built for FC6 and FC5. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 3 09:11:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Sep 2006 05:11:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201000] Review Request: libFoundation - A free implementation of OpenStep's Foundation Kit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609030911.k839BA0g006904@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libFoundation - A free implementation of OpenStep's Foundation Kit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201000 Bug 201000 depends on bug 197649, which changed state. Bug 197649 Summary: Review Request: gnustep-make - GNUstep makefile package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197649 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 3 09:16:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Sep 2006 05:16:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197814] Review Request: autogen In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609030916.k839G2rI007378@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: autogen https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197814 ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2006-09-03 05:16 EST ------- 1. I'm on FC5... can you poke the maintainer of libopts to build it for FC5? 3. I'd much rather you tried to fix it, like I did it for crm114. Should be trivial. 4. I see. It's a matter of preference. It's not wrong or right. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 3 11:53:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Sep 2006 07:53:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205066] New: Review Request: telepathy-python - Python package containing base and proxy classes for telepathy Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205066 Summary: Review Request: telepathy-python - Python package containing base and proxy classes for telepathy Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: sander at hoentjen.eu QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://fedora.hoentjen.eu/telepathy/telepathy-python.spec SRPM URL: http://fedora.hoentjen.eu/telepathy/telepathy-python-0.13.2-1.src.rpm Description: Telepathy-python is a Python package containing base classes for use in connection managers and proxy classes for use in clients. It's used in at least Cohoba and telepathy-msn. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 3 11:54:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Sep 2006 07:54:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205030] Review Request: atomix - Little mind game where you have to build molecules out of atoms lying around In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609031154.k83BsD6t013535@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: atomix - Little mind game where you have to build molecules out of atoms lying around https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205030 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at leemhuis.info 2006-09-03 07:54 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > The game is setgid games, but doesn't appear to completely drop setgid > privileges after starting up, according to /proc//status. [...] Yes, sorry, I wanted to comment on this. Citing http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Games "If necessary, a game can be made setgid 'games' in order to allow a shared scoreboard file. But only if necessary, and care should be taken to drop setgid privileges when not needed. The following example shows how to properly drop setuid/setgid privileges. [...]" I'm not a real C-Programmer (never found time for it :-/ and these days my work around Fedora consumes all of my free time) so I can't integrate above or comment closer on what Wart noticed in Comment #1. I'd be glad if someone from the Games SIG (or someone else) could look closer into this whole stuff. (In reply to comment #2) > You're missing find-langs from the spec file - there are a lot of translation > files in there. /me looks closer -- yes, seems so, but they didn't get installed. (even with gettext around on the system). Ahh, seems it's a upstream problem. See GNOME bz#334319 . I worked around this bug with running sed -i 's!^SOURCES = !&\n'"$(grep "^CATALOGS" po/Makefile.in)"'!' po/Makefile after configure. There are probably better ways do do that. Suggestion welcomed. Latest package now atomix-2.14.0-2 Spec URL: http://www.leemhuis.info/files/fedorarpms/SPECS.fdr/atomix.spec Diff URL: http://www.leemhuis.info/files/fedorarpms/SPECS.fdr/atomix.spec.diff SRPM URL: http://www.leemhuis.info/files/fedorarpms/SRPMS.fdr/atomix-2.14.0-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 3 12:18:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Sep 2006 08:18:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190144] Review Request: hevea - LaTeX to HTML translator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609031218.k83CITio014059@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hevea - LaTeX to HTML translator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190144 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|andreas at bawue.net |mpeters at mac.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 3 12:32:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Sep 2006 08:32:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203520] Review Request: evolution-brutus In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609031232.k83CWQi7014332@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: evolution-brutus Alias: evolution-brutus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203520 sander at hoentjen.eu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |sander at hoentjen.eu ------- Additional Comments From sander at hoentjen.eu 2006-09-03 08:32 EST ------- at first glance: - change make to: make %{?_smp_mflags} - pkgconfig is not really needed as a buildrequire, since it is also required by gnome-common. - Vendor and Packager tag should be removed - I guess the autoreq tag can go as well - replace license with just the text GPL - --enable-brutus-debug=no should be yes to build with symbols? - don't use the macro %makeinstall since it is broken - BuildRequires: gettext is missing (required to build the translations) I am not a sponsor so I can't approve your package, but I hope my directions help. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 3 12:35:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Sep 2006 08:35:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203520] Review Request: evolution-brutus In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609031235.k83CZTTT014452@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: evolution-brutus Alias: evolution-brutus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203520 ------- Additional Comments From sander at hoentjen.eu 2006-09-03 08:35 EST ------- Also I get: checking Evolution Data Server version... 1.7 configure: error: Unsupported version of Evolution Data Server. Please report this to . It looks like you are also upstream so I suggest very strongly to have this fixed since it is needed to be build for devel (upcoming FC6) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 3 13:14:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Sep 2006 09:14:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205066] Review Request: telepathy-python - Python package containing base and proxy classes for telepathy In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609031314.k83DEfLm015437@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: telepathy-python - Python package containing base and proxy classes for telepathy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205066 bdpepple at ameritech.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at ameritech.net 2006-09-03 09:14 EST ------- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 205031 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 3 13:14:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Sep 2006 09:14:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205031] Review Request: python-telepathy - Python libraries for Telepathy In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609031314.k83DEgXe015450@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-telepathy - Python libraries for Telepathy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205031 bdpepple at ameritech.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |sander at hoentjen.eu ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at ameritech.net 2006-09-03 09:14 EST ------- *** Bug 205066 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 3 13:17:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Sep 2006 09:17:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196120] Review Request: gresistor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609031317.k83DHQcj015540@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gresistor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196120 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-09-03 09:17 EST ------- First review of gresistor: 1. From http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines : * Licensing - Well, it seems that this package is distributed under GPL (my recognition is that GPL is more strict than LGPL, so if the package includes the code of both GPL and LGPL, the license of the whole package is GPL, perhaps). However, it would be better that you ask for upstream to clarify the license (from the discussion above, it seems you have already did it). * Requires: - python <- required by pygtk2-libglade Also, this package requires python(abi) = 2.4. * Compiler flags - Well, usually CFLAGS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS" is needed, however, how about for this package? This src package don't have any .c files and this is a NOARCH package, so CFLAGS should not be necessary. 2. From http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/ScriptletSnippets : * Requires(post,postun) - Well, all of Requires(post,postun) seems unnecessary accoding to the URL above. (%post, %postun scriptlets are necessary), * GTK+ icon cache - No icons are installed under /usr/share/icons. Perhaps it is better that + create symlink under /usr/share/icons/hicolor/48x48/apps which points to /usr/share/gresistor/icon.png + fix (fedora-)gresistor.desktop + and call gtk-update-icon-cache 3. From http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines : = Nothing. 4. Other things I have noticed: = Nothing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 3 13:42:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Sep 2006 09:42:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205031] Review Request: python-telepathy - Python libraries for Telepathy In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609031342.k83Dgux3016129@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-telepathy - Python libraries for Telepathy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205031 ------- Additional Comments From sander at hoentjen.eu 2006-09-03 09:42 EST ------- Spec file is basically the same as I had, only you used the correct naming for Fedora. Also the URL *could* be changed to http://telepathy.freedesktop.org/wiki/TelepathyPython but that doesn't really matter. I also had the examples packaged under docs, but I am not even sure if that is a good thing. I would approve, but I am still not in fedorabugs so I'll leave the review part until i am, maybe someone else will pick up before then. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 3 14:03:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Sep 2006 10:03:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204343] Review Request: qcomicbook - a comic book viewing program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609031403.k83E3FxO016552@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qcomicbook - a comic book viewing program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204343 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-09-03 10:02 EST ------- Well, this pachage (-0.3.2-5) fails to be rebuilt in mock on 2.6.17-1.2174_FC5smp with leaving the logs: config.status: creating Makefile config.status: creating src/Makefile config.status: creating icons/Makefile config.status: creating help/Makefile config.status: creating help/en/Makefile config.status: creating src/config.h config.status: executing depfiles commands + -j2 /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.30019: line 50: -j2: command not found error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.30019 (%build) RPM build errors: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.30019 (%build) Error building package from qcomicbook-0.3.2-5.fc5.src.rpm, See build log ending DEBUG: Executing /usr/sbin/mock-helper umount /var/lib/mock/fedora-5-i386-core/root/proc DEBUG: Executing /usr/sbin/mock-helper umount /var/lib/mock/fedora-5-i386-core/root/dev/pts done ... by a apparent typo in spec file ( the line %{?_smp_mflags} ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 3 14:06:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Sep 2006 10:06:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205029] Review Request: autobuild-applet - a GNOME applet for monitoring Test-AutoBuild build status In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609031406.k83E64TB016649@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: autobuild-applet - a GNOME applet for monitoring Test-AutoBuild build status https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205029 bdpepple at ameritech.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |bdpepple at ameritech.net OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 3 14:23:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Sep 2006 10:23:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193897] Review Request: mysql-connector-java - Official JDBC driver for MySQL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609031423.k83ENxCl017098@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mysql-connector-java - Official JDBC driver for MySQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193897 green at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(ifoox at redhat.com) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 3 14:25:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Sep 2006 10:25:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204525] Review Request: eclipse-gef - Eclipse Graphical Editing Framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609031425.k83EP2SG017162@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-gef - Eclipse Graphical Editing Framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204525 green at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(overholt at redhat.co | |m) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 3 15:08:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Sep 2006 11:08:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204343] Review Request: qcomicbook - a comic book viewing program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609031508.k83F8nLe018328@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qcomicbook - a comic book viewing program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204343 ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at ameritech.net 2006-09-03 11:08 EST ------- (In reply to comment #9) > Well, this pachage (-0.3.2-5) fails to be rebuilt in mock > ... by a apparent typo in spec file ( the line %{?_smp_mflags} ) Correct, 'make %{?_smp_mflags}' should be used instead of '%{?_smp_mflags}' -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 3 15:49:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Sep 2006 11:49:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205040] Review Request: geda-gnetlist - Netlister for the gEDA project In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609031549.k83FnJUC019419@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: geda-gnetlist - Netlister for the gEDA project https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205040 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-09-03 11:49 EST ------- First review of geda-gnetlist. Seems almost okay and I hope I can change the status of this bug soon. 1. From http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines : * BuildRequires: - libpng-devel <- required by gd-devel <- required by libgeda-devel * Timestamps: - Well, this package contains many text files, too. Again 'INSTALL="install -c -p" ' method seems to work well. 2. From http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines : = Nothing. 3. Other things I have noticed : = Well, the test case you showed in the comment #3 was successfully done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 3 16:19:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Sep 2006 12:19:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192583] Review Request: php-pear-XML-Parser - XML parsing class based on PHP's bundled expat In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609031619.k83GJmde020135@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-XML-Parser - XML parsing class based on PHP's bundled expat Alias: php-pear-XML-Parser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192583 ------- Additional Comments From Fedora at FamilleCollet.com 2006-09-03 12:19 EST ------- Spec: http://remi.collet.free.fr/rpms/extras/php-pear-XML-Parser.spec SRPM: http://remi.collet.free.fr/rpms/extras/php-pear-XML-Parser-1.2.7-3.fc5.src.rpm Mock: http://remi.collet.free.fr/rpms/extras/php-pear-XML-Parser-build.log Changes: - new and simpler %%prep and %%install -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 3 16:30:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Sep 2006 12:30:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205043] Review Request: geda-gattrib - Attribute editor for gEDA In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609031630.k83GUuQL020374@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: geda-gattrib - Attribute editor for gEDA https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205043 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 3 16:33:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Sep 2006 12:33:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190958] Review Request: php-pear-Net-SMTP In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609031633.k83GXZIq020493@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Net-SMTP Alias: php-pear-Net-SMTP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190958 ------- Additional Comments From Fedora at FamilleCollet.com 2006-09-03 12:33 EST ------- Spec: http://remi.collet.free.fr/rpms/extras/php-pear-Net-SMTP.spec SRPM: http://remi.collet.free.fr/rpms/extras/php-pear-Net-SMTP-1.2.8-4.fc5.src.rpm Mock: http://remi.collet.free.fr/rpms/extras/php-pear-Net-SMTP-build.log Changes: - new and simpler %%prep and %%install -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 3 16:44:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Sep 2006 12:44:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204152] Review Request: orca - Accessibility replacement for gnopernicus In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609031644.k83GiTIx020823@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: orca - Accessibility replacement for gnopernicus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204152 ------- Additional Comments From kevin.kofler at chello.at 2006-09-03 12:44 EST ------- > Actually the Group tag is used by NOTHING. I think it is still used by apt-rpm and frontends (e.g. Synaptic). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 3 16:51:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Sep 2006 12:51:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190957] Review Request: php-pear-Net-Socket In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609031651.k83GpLNR020974@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Net-Socket Alias: php-pear-Net-Socket https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190957 ------- Additional Comments From Fedora at FamilleCollet.com 2006-09-03 12:51 EST ------- Spec: http://remi.collet.free.fr/rpms/extras/php-pear-Net-Socket.spec SRPM: http://remi.collet.free.fr/rpms/extras/php-pear-Net-Socket-1.0.6-4.fc5.src.rpm Mock: http://remi.collet.free.fr/rpms/extras/php-pear-Net-Socket-build.log Changes: - new and simpler %%prep and %%install -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 3 17:05:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Sep 2006 13:05:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204955] Review Request: digikamimageplugins-doc - Documentation for digiKamimageplugins In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609031705.k83H55Zb021275@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: digikamimageplugins-doc - Documentation for digiKamimageplugins https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204955 ------- Additional Comments From mgarski at post.pl 2006-09-03 13:05 EST ------- rpmlint says: E: digikamimageplugins-doc configure-without-libdir-spec W: digikamimageplugins-doc mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs W: digikamimageplugins-doc patch-not-applied Patch1: digikamimageplugins-doc-0.8.2-noarch.patch + Build fine on x86_64 + BuildRoot is correct + Source URL is correct + License used is GFDL + License file README is included + MD5 sum on tarball match upstream tarball 9735437a0f385e28c2179ea25965d78f digikamimageplugins-doc-0.8.2-r1.tar.bz2 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 3 17:13:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Sep 2006 13:13:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190956] Review Request: php-pear-Auth-SASL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609031713.k83HD35K021418@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Auth-SASL Alias: php-pear-Auth-SASL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190956 ------- Additional Comments From Fedora at FamilleCollet.com 2006-09-03 13:13 EST ------- SPEC : http://remi.collet.free.fr/rpms/extras/php-pear-Auth-SASL.spec SRPM : http://remi.collet.free.fr/rpms/extras/php-pear-Auth-SASL-1.0.2-3.fc5.src.rpm Mock : http://remi.collet.free.fr/rpms/extras/php-pear-Auth-SASL-build.log %changelog * Sun Sep 03 2006 Remi Collet 1.0.2-3 - new and simpler %%prep and %%install -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 3 17:37:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Sep 2006 13:37:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205041] Review Request: tellico - collection manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609031737.k83Hbr4X022175@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tellico - collection manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205041 ------- Additional Comments From jamatos at fc.up.pt 2006-09-03 13:37 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > > 1. In your desktop-file-install you have --vendor="", but according > to guidelines that should be --vendor=fedora. Also, this causes > builds under mock to fail because the fedora-tellio.desktop file doesn't > exist. As you can guess, I had that. I hesitated because the desktop files is included in the project. I will revert that to vendor fedora. > 2. INSTALL NEWS README can probibly all be dropped. INSTALL is the generic > auto* install document, NEWS and README are both of size 0. You are right. Done. > 3. The Summary is a bit generic: > Summary: collection manager > Perhaps at least add that it's a KDE based collection manager? Honestly I don't like to to label a program based on the framework used. That can be seen from its dependencies. This is build with kde and not needed or used by kde. It is interesting even if kde is not used... although it will require the dependencies to be satisfied. > 4. rpmlint says: > W: tellico summary-not-capitalized collection manager > So, it should at least be "A KDE collection manager" I changed that to "A collection manager". If you insist I can add there the KDE word though, I am not dogmatic about it. :-) Spec URL: http://www.fc.up.pt/pessoas/jamatos/fedora-extras/tellico.spec SRPM URL: http://www.fc.up.pt/pessoas/jamatos/fedora-extras/tellico-1.2-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 3 17:59:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Sep 2006 13:59:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204343] Review Request: qcomicbook - a comic book viewing program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609031759.k83HxowP022935@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qcomicbook - a comic book viewing program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204343 ------- Additional Comments From scott at perturb.org 2006-09-03 13:59 EST ------- Oh good catch. Updated spec and package: SRPM: http://www.perturb.org/tmp/qcomicbook-0.3.2-6.src.rpm Spec: http://www.perturb.org/tmp/qcomicbook.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 3 18:26:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Sep 2006 14:26:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204152] Review Request: orca - Accessibility replacement for gnopernicus In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609031826.k83IQZcj024273@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: orca - Accessibility replacement for gnopernicus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204152 ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-09-03 14:26 EST ------- They should be fixed to not use it. Its inconsistant, there is no real control mechanism, there is no support for conditional includes (only include this package if this other package has been selected), etc... Consider it deprecated. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 3 18:37:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Sep 2006 14:37:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205073] New: Review Request: MudMagic Mud Client - Onlnie Text Game Client Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205073 Summary: Review Request: MudMagic Mud Client - Onlnie Text Game Client Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kyndig at mudmagic.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.mudmagic.com/mud-client/downloads/mudmagic.spec SRPM URL: http://www.mudmagic.com/mud-client/downloads/mudmagic-1.9-fdr.src.rpm Description: Gtk program for connecting to online text games ( Muds ). This is my first package and I am seeking a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 3 18:53:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Sep 2006 14:53:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205073] Review Request: MudMagic Mud Client - Onlnie Text Game Client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609031853.k83IrRbw026257@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: MudMagic Mud Client - Onlnie Text Game Client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205073 paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: MudMagic Mud|Review Request: MudMagic Mud |Client - Onlnie Text Game |Client - Onlnie Text Game |Client |Client Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-09-03 14:53 EST ------- Have you submitted a package before? If not, you'll need to get a sponsor http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/HowToGetSponsored gives you the details. You will need to add FE-NEEDSPONSOR to the FE-blocks below. The spec isn't bad, but you need to replace Release: fdr with Release: 1%{?dist} %{_libdir}/pkgconfig/mudmagic.pc has to be in it's own package (so you'll need a -devel subpackage) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 3 18:57:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Sep 2006 14:57:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203662] Review Request: dx - Open source version of IBM's Visualization Data Explorer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609031857.k83Ivm2T026370@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dx - Open source version of IBM's Visualization Data Explorer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203662 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-09-03 14:57 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=135465) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=135465&action=view) rpmlint errors from main dx package Something is seriously wrong with the package here. It builds fine and the srpm is clean with rpmlint, but the main package gives the errors with this attachment (piles of them!) and the devel package gives E: dx-devel only-non-binary-in-usr-lib W: dx-devel no-documentation (not worried by that) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 3 19:07:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Sep 2006 15:07:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205057] Review Request: dx-samples - OpenDX Examples In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609031907.k83J7WFW026678@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dx-samples - OpenDX Examples https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205057 paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 3 19:11:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Sep 2006 15:11:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200348] Review Request: libgadu - Gadu-Gadu protocol support library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609031911.k83JBgWY026759@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgadu - Gadu-Gadu protocol support library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200348 rpm at greysector.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rpm at greysector.net ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2006-09-03 15:11 EST ------- What's the problem with packaging ekg instead? I have a working package if anyone is interested. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 3 19:12:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Sep 2006 15:12:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205030] Review Request: atomix - Little mind game where you have to build molecules out of atoms lying around In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609031912.k83JC64b026794@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: atomix - Little mind game where you have to build molecules out of atoms lying around https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205030 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-09-03 15:11 EST ------- Okay, now that the langs are there, I can see no problem why this shouldn't be in extras. The setgid is an issue, so before I FE-ACCEPT this, I'll seek guidance. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 3 19:17:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Sep 2006 15:17:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205073] Review Request: MudMagic Mud Client - Onlnie Text Game Client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609031917.k83JH7tc026995@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: MudMagic Mud Client - Onlnie Text Game Client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205073 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-09-03 15:17 EST ------- rpmlint output srpm W: mudmagic strange-permission mudmagic.spec 0600 W: mudmagic mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (ignorable) rpm W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 1.8 1.9-fdr (see #1 dist flag) W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/libmudmagic.so W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/pkgconfig/mudmagic.pc built cleanly in mock (i386). Fix the above problems (and the ones in #1), let me know if you have a sponsor and I'll do the full review on this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 3 19:22:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Sep 2006 15:22:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203662] Review Request: dx - Open source version of IBM's Visualization Data Explorer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609031922.k83JMHCU027122@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dx - Open source version of IBM's Visualization Data Explorer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203662 ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2006-09-03 15:22 EST ------- E: dx wrong-script-interpreter /usr/share/dx/help/dxall549 "F-adobe-helvetica-medium-r-normal--18*" E: dx non-executable-script /usr/share/dx/help/dxall549 0644 These errors are to be ignored, IMHO. Those are help files, not scripts. E: dx-devel only-non-binary-in-usr-lib This is caused by arch.mak file being in %_libdir, I'll move it to %_includedir/dx -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 3 20:21:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Sep 2006 16:21:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205075] New: Review Request: fwbackups - a user backup program, with support for automated backups and on-demand backups Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205075 Summary: Review Request: fwbackups - a user backup program, with support for automated backups and on-demand backups Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: s.adam at diffingo.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.diffingo.com/downloads/FWBackups/fwbackups.spec SRPM URL: http://www.diffingo.com/downloads/FWBackups/fwbackups-1.42-2.src.rpm Description: fwbackups is a user backups program that can run a backup on-the-spot based on user-specified paths, or by it's automated backup feature which will backup user-specified paths and backup them to an appropriate location automatically, at a specified time and date. ** this is my first package submission and I need a sponsor. ** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 3 20:22:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Sep 2006 16:22:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205075] Review Request: fwbackups - a user backup program, with support for automated backups and on-demand backups In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609032022.k83KMMJA028620@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fwbackups - a user backup program, with support for automated backups and on-demand backups https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205075 s.adam at diffingo.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 3 21:16:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Sep 2006 17:16:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205073] Review Request: MudMagic Mud Client - Onlnie Text Game Client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609032116.k83LGu9Z030282@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: MudMagic Mud Client - Onlnie Text Game Client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205073 ------- Additional Comments From kyndig at mudmagic.com 2006-09-03 17:16 EST ------- Thank you Paul for the comments. I do not have a sponsor. > Release: fdr > with > Release: 1%{?dist} I performed this update, which changes the file download location mentioned in the initial bugzilla entry. The new file location is: SRPM URL: http://www.mudmagic.com/mud-client/downloads/mudmagic-1.9-1.src.rpm > %{_libdir}/pkgconfig/mudmagic.pc excluded > mudmagic mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (ignorable) fixed > incoherent-version-in-changelog 1.8 1.9-fdr (see #1 dist flag) fixed > W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/libmudmagic.so > W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/pkgconfig/mudmagic.pc excluded > W: mudmagic strange-permission mudmagic.spec 0600 This error with permission was created because I created the rpm files from tar-ball. I performed the additional steps by building directly off the spec file in /usr/src/redhat/SPECS, and it fixed this error [ no updates were needed to remove this error ] Thank you, Calvin -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 3 21:18:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Sep 2006 17:18:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205073] Review Request: MudMagic Mud Client - Onlnie Text Game Client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609032118.k83LI6sG030324@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: MudMagic Mud Client - Onlnie Text Game Client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205073 kyndig at mudmagic.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 3 21:26:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Sep 2006 17:26:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197814] Review Request: autogen In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609032126.k83LQawV030658@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: autogen https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197814 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-09-03 17:26 EST ------- Spec URL: http://www.knox.net.nz/~nodoid/autogen.spec - fixes #24, though doesn't fix the race condition (I've tried your fix and it would work, but not consistently here) libopts should be in FC5 extras from 4th Sept -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 3 21:31:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Sep 2006 17:31:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205073] Review Request: MudMagic Mud Client - Onlnie Text Game Client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609032131.k83LVlYq030805@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: MudMagic Mud Client - Onlnie Text Game Client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205073 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-09-03 17:31 EST ------- Don't exclude the .so or .pc file, just create a -devel package (below goes into the spec file - package and description after the description of the main package, files after the normal files bit) %package devel Summary : Development files for MudMagic Group: Development/Libraries Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} pkgconfig %description devel Development files for MudMagic .... %files devel %{_libdir}/libmudmagic.so %{_libdir}/pkgconfig/mudmagic.pc On the subject of sponsorship, you need to submit a couple more packages than this so that sponsors are happy that they know you're au fait with the packaging guidelines. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 3 21:32:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Sep 2006 17:32:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205073] Review Request: MudMagic Mud Client - Onlnie Text Game Client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609032132.k83LWVv5030835@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: MudMagic Mud Client - Onlnie Text Game Client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205073 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-09-03 17:32 EST ------- Forgot to say, changing the mode on the specfile chmod 644 rpmbuild/SPECS/mudmagic.spec :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 3 22:30:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Sep 2006 18:30:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205073] Review Request: MudMagic Mud Client - Onlnie Text Game Client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609032230.k83MUpbO032463@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: MudMagic Mud Client - Onlnie Text Game Client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205073 ------- Additional Comments From kyndig at mudmagic.com 2006-09-03 18:30 EST ------- > Don't exclude the .so or .pc file, just create a -devel package Thank you, I went off your example and some other OpenSource spec.in files. The src.rpm and mudmagic.spec rpm have been updated, and changes committed to CVS. > On the subject of sponsorship, you need to submit a couple more packages than > this so that sponsors are happy that they know you're au fait with the packaging > guidelines. Ah. Thank you. I was wondering why it was taking 2+ years to get this software project in Fedora. It is currently supported by Debian, and a few other non-popular Linux distro's. Each of those distro's had their own sponsor working to get this program submitted though. This is the only software program I have any time to work on. I don't have any plans in developing additional software or package releases than what this software requires (but if that's the _only_ way to add it to FC, I just might eventually do that! ) I will look for a submitter to handle the FC distribution ( anyone available?! =) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 3 22:32:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Sep 2006 18:32:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200348] Review Request: libgadu - Gadu-Gadu protocol support library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609032232.k83MW6ra032493@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgadu - Gadu-Gadu protocol support library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200348 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-09-03 18:31 EST ------- (In reply to comment #16) > What's the problem with packaging ekg instead? I have a working package if > anyone is interested. I don't think there'd be a problem packaging ekg -- I'm sure ekg and libgadu are not mutually exclusive. Go ahead and submit it if you like. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 3 23:48:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Sep 2006 19:48:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196591] Review Request: bitlbee In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609032348.k83NmxKx001834@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bitlbee https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196591 ------- Additional Comments From paul at xtdnet.nl 2006-09-03 19:48 EST ------- I'll happilly take it on for approval. It does not matter much to me who maintains the package. I didn't use __install or __rm because that's the FE preferred method. It is the same reason I use %configure, and not ./configure, despite bitlbee not supporting all options. make vs %{__make} I am not sure what the official FE policy is, I find both being used. I noticed my package did not properly install the help files. They are not available. Your package does correctly install the help file. I am not sure why you Require: xmlto, as it seems to be this is not used at all. I cannot find any calls to xmlto/xmlif in the building, and the xmlto package only provides two binaries, no libraries. I am not sure I understand your comments on install/make and breaking/not fixing things. My spec file also contained the post/postun/preun entries, which you should copy. It properly adds the bitlbee service so that programs as 'ntsysv' can enable/disable these (xinetd) services properly. Also add the appropriate Requires (see my spec file). As for which user to use. I guess neither daemon nor nobody is supposed to own files. We could add a user bitlbee to run as instead? This user would not need Fedora registration, as it is completely irrelevant what uid/gid it would get. The accept() issue has been reported by me to upstream: http://bugs.bitlbee.org/bitlbee/ticket/200 If you create a new package, I will do some more testing again. I noticed my version did not correctly support any of the proxy settings, but I am not sure if that is a building issue (missing certain libraries?) or whether this is a generic upstream issue. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 3 23:51:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Sep 2006 19:51:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200348] Review Request: libgadu - Gadu-Gadu protocol support library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609032351.k83Npufk001897@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgadu - Gadu-Gadu protocol support library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200348 ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2006-09-03 19:51 EST ------- Unfortunately, there is, because ekg includes it. libgadu was written by ekg developers. And ekg does have numbered releases, hence my suggestion to package ekg instead. I have an ekg src.rpm that produces both ekg and libgadu. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 3 23:53:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Sep 2006 19:53:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192583] Review Request: php-pear-XML-Parser - XML parsing class based on PHP's bundled expat In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609032353.k83Nr5Gc001952@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-XML-Parser - XML parsing class based on PHP's bundled expat Alias: php-pear-XML-Parser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192583 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2006-09-03 19:53 EST ------- Looks good, approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 3 23:57:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Sep 2006 19:57:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190956] Review Request: php-pear-Auth-SASL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609032357.k83Nvv8f002053@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Auth-SASL Alias: php-pear-Auth-SASL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190956 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2006-09-03 19:57 EST ------- Looks good. Approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 4 00:01:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Sep 2006 20:01:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192583] Review Request: php-pear-XML-Parser - XML parsing class based on PHP's bundled expat In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609040001.k8401Mw0002223@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-XML-Parser - XML parsing class based on PHP's bundled expat Alias: php-pear-XML-Parser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192583 ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2006-09-03 20:01 EST ------- please change %defattr(-,root,root) to defattr(-,root,root,-) after importing into cvs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 4 00:04:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Sep 2006 20:04:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190957] Review Request: php-pear-Net-Socket In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609040004.k8404NgX002363@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Net-Socket Alias: php-pear-Net-Socket https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190957 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2006-09-03 20:04 EST ------- Change: %defattr(-,root,root) To: %defattr(-,root,root,-) After checking into CVS. Approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 4 00:09:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Sep 2006 20:09:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190958] Review Request: php-pear-Net-SMTP In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609040009.k8409Qsv002491@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Net-SMTP Alias: php-pear-Net-SMTP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190958 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2006-09-03 20:09 EST ------- Change: %defattr(-,root,root) To: %defattr(-,root,root,-) After checking into CVS. Approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 4 00:17:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Sep 2006 20:17:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190101] Review Request: php-pear-Log In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609040017.k840Hooc002762@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Log Alias: php-pear-Log https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190101 ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2006-09-03 20:17 EST ------- Hi Remi, can you update the %setup and %install for this guy too? Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 4 00:30:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Sep 2006 20:30:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196824] Review Request: php-pear-Mail-Mime In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609040030.k840UHfR003243@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Mail-Mime Alias: php-pear-Mail-Mime https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196824 ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2006-09-03 20:30 EST ------- Hi Brandon, Please update your spec file based off of the following template: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=135472 More information here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198706 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 4 01:05:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Sep 2006 21:05:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196793] Review Request: php-pear-MDB2 - PEAR: Database Abstraction Layer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609040105.k8415t2c004986@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-MDB2 - PEAR: Database Abstraction Layer Alias: php-pear-MDB2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196793 ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2006-09-03 21:05 EST ------- Update SPEC file and SRPM to match latest template SPEC: http://tkmame.retrogames.com/fedora-extras/php-pear-MDB2.spec SRPM: http://tkmame.retrogames.com/fedora-extras/php-pear-MDB2-2.1.0-4.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 4 01:27:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Sep 2006 21:27:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202853] Review Request: wfut - WorldForge media updater tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609040127.k841RedY005594@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wfut - WorldForge media updater tool Alias: wfut https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202853 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2006-09-03 21:27 EST ------- - rpmlint output clean - package named according to package naming guildelines - spec file name matches %{name} - package meets packaging guidelines - licensed with open source compatible license - license matches actual license - license file included in %doc - spec file written in American english - spec file is legible - sources match upstream 23d40558c121d5c52917846a36d48b80 WFUT-1.0-SNAPSHOT-src.tar.gz - compiles and builds on fc5 x86_64 - all build dependencies listed in build requires - package does not use locales - package does not contain shared libraries - package is not relocatable - package owns all directories it creates - no duplicates in %files - permissions on files set properly - contains proper %clean section - macro usage is consistent - package contains permissible content - no large documentation - %doc files do not affect runtime - no header files or static libraries - no pkgconfig files - no library files - no devel package - no .la files - package is a GUI application and contains proper desktop files - package does not own files or directories owned by other packages I can't find anything wrong with this spec file. Approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 4 01:46:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Sep 2006 21:46:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193894] Review Request: ant-contrib - A collection of tasks for Ant In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609040146.k841kKoF006233@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ant-contrib - A collection of tasks for Ant https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193894 ifoox at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From ifoox at redhat.com 2006-09-03 21:45 EST ------- It seems like this is a problem with my system. Every source RPM I try to build does not get a -debuginfo package. Building this on a different machine produces normal results so I have imported this into CVS and built it for the devel branch . I'll build it for FC5 as well as soon as the branch gets crated. Closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 4 01:46:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Sep 2006 21:46:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193897] Review Request: mysql-connector-java - Official JDBC driver for MySQL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609040146.k841kfde006269@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mysql-connector-java - Official JDBC driver for MySQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193897 Bug 193897 depends on bug 193894, which changed state. Bug 193894 Summary: Review Request: ant-contrib - A collection of tasks for Ant https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193894 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |RAWHIDE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 4 02:40:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Sep 2006 22:40:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199168] Review Request: CGAL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609040240.k842ewJH007929@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: CGAL Alias: CGAL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199168 ------- Additional Comments From ed at eh3.com 2006-09-03 22:40 EST ------- Hi Laurent, I'm sorry for the delay. Heres a more formal review. good: + naming guidelines OK + source matches upstream + builds in in FC6-i386 mock OK + license files are correctly included + spec is legible and appears sane + shared libs OK + dir ownership looks OK + %clean is OK + macro use looks OK + code not content OK + proper use of devel + no *.la files needswork: - license should say QPL/LGPL and not QPL/GPL - the description in /usr/share/doc/CGAL-3.2.1/README.Fedora is no longer accurate since the CGAL-libs package was removed comments / not-sure: - Typically, packages are not supposed to include "private" versions of 3-rd party packages. Instead, the 3-rd party bits should be made into their own separate packages and then used as build- and/or run-time dependencies. At least theoretically, the CORE bits should be a separate package. Looking at the CORE web site: http://cs.nyu.edu/exact/core/download/prerelease/ it appears that CORE does not receive frequent updates. The last release was in 2004. So one could perhaps argue that the CGAL upstream is effectively acting as maintainers for CORE. Is that the case? If so, I think it could stay as-is provided there are no naming conflicts or other problems. - Could all the *.vcproj files be deleted? I don't see any reason why folks would want them on a Fedora system. rpmlint reports: E: CGAL-devel file-in-usr-marked-as-conffile /usr/share/CGAL/make/makefile W: CGAL-devel non-conffile-in-etc /etc/profile.d/cgal.sh E: CGAL-devel script-without-shellbang /etc/profile.d/cgal.sh E: CGAL-devel non-executable-script /etc/profile.d/cgal.sh 0644 W: CGAL-devel non-conffile-in-etc /etc/profile.d/cgal.csh E: CGAL-devel script-without-shellbang /etc/profile.d/cgal.csh E: CGAL-devel non-executable-script /etc/profile.d/cgal.csh 0644 which are all probably safe to ignore I'm tempted to approve this package conditional on the two needswork items being fixed. Does anyone else have any objections or suggestions? If there are no negative comments in 2--3 days, I'll send an approval message. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 4 03:56:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Sep 2006 23:56:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 185423] Review Request: php-pear-PEAR-Command-Packaging: make-rpm-spec command for PEAR In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609040356.k843uH6U009936@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-PEAR-Command-Packaging: make-rpm-spec command for PEAR Alias: php-pear-PCP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=185423 ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2006-09-03 23:56 EST ------- Hi Tim, can you update this spec file per the latest template: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=135472 More info at: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198706 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 4 04:16:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2006 00:16:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202853] Review Request: wfut - WorldForge media updater tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609040416.k844GQWM010493@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wfut - WorldForge media updater tool Alias: wfut https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202853 wart at kobold.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2006-09-04 00:16 EST ------- Imported and built. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 4 04:16:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2006 00:16:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198839] Review Request: sear - WorldForge client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609040416.k844Gb3m010506@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sear - WorldForge client Alias: sear https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198839 Bug 198839 depends on bug 202853, which changed state. Bug 202853 Summary: Review Request: wfut - WorldForge media updater tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202853 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 4 04:47:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2006 00:47:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199254] Review Request: perl-perlmenu In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609040447.k844lZDM011395@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-perlmenu https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199254 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-09-04 00:47 EST ------- I am not able to access CVS at all so may be this bug will be in pending state. Once i got CVS access and i will import package i will CLOSE this bug -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 4 07:05:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2006 03:05:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205043] Review Request: geda-gattrib - Attribute editor for gEDA In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609040705.k8475JDw016102@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: geda-gattrib - Attribute editor for gEDA https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205043 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-09-04 03:05 EST ------- First review of geda-gattrib. 1. From http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines : * BuildRequires: - libpng-devel <- required by gd-devel <- required by libgeda-devel * Desktop files: - No icon is installed in a proper directory. fedora-gattrib.desktop says that "gattrib.{png,xpm}" should be installed in a proper directory. 2. From http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines : = Nothing. 3. Other things I have noticed : = Nothing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 4 09:10:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2006 05:10:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204228] Review Request: sleuthkit - Open Source forensic toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609040910.k849Am3f024655@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sleuthkit - Open Source forensic toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204228 ------- Additional Comments From fedora-devel at mx-solutions.de 2006-09-04 05:10 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > NTFS support in sleuthkit may not be allowed, see: > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/ForbiddenItems#head-e52c1870d4467fe40c9da546fe3328e4a2430834 > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/65749 > > As well you should look at: > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/Contributors > > You seem not to be sponsored, so you need to block FE-NEEDSPONSOR. > > No one until today want to sponsor me... So grant me to review bad packages from me. The Guidelines i remmber me just in the moment that sleuthkit support ntfs. But i don't know how to disable. Possibly that the package review ends here. :/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 4 09:13:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2006 05:13:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204228] Review Request: sleuthkit - Open Source forensic toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609040913.k849Doi5024869@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sleuthkit - Open Source forensic toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204228 ------- Additional Comments From fedora-devel at mx-solutions.de 2006-09-04 05:13 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > * The Packager & Vendor tags should not be included, nor refer to the Dag Wieers > repository. Please remove them. Yes i remove. > > * The %setup macro is better invoked with the -q arg since there is no need to > pollute build output with a list of files being extracted from the tar.gz Ok, will fix it. > > * The build process in the package is not honouring the $RPM_OPTS_FLAGS compiler > settings. For example - its compiling with -O -g : > > gcc -DLINUX2 -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE -DVER=\"2.05\" > -I../auxtools -I../imgtools -O -Wall -g -c -o jcat.o jcat.c > > While current Fedora build flags are: > > -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector > --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 > > It would be very desirable to have the build process honour these options since > they enable various security protection measures. A cursory look at the source > code suggests it would probably need a patch applied to the Makefiles since they > are hand-written instead of using AutoTools. IMHO, such a patch would be > worthwhile, unless there are specific problems compiling the tools with these flags. > I have tried with the standard flags but it seems that the -j3 is the problem. How i can filter it out? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 4 10:57:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2006 06:57:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196120] Review Request: gresistor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609041057.k84AvPQw030534@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gresistor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196120 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2006-09-04 06:57 EST ------- (In reply to comment #13) > First review of gresistor: > > 1. From http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines : > > * Licensing > - Well, it seems that this package is distributed under > GPL (my recognition is that GPL is more strict than LGPL, > so if the package includes the code of both GPL and LGPL, > the license of the whole package is GPL, perhaps). > However, it would be better that you ask for upstream to > clarify the license (from the discussion above, it seems > you have already did it). Ok, I've opted for GPL > * Requires: > - python <- required by pygtk2-libglade > Also, this package requires python(abi) = 2.4. Fixed > * Compiler flags > - Well, usually CFLAGS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS" is needed, however, > how about for this package? This src package don't have any .c > files and this is a NOARCH package, so CFLAGS should not be > necessary. Fixed > 2. From http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/ScriptletSnippets : > > * Requires(post,postun) > - Well, all of Requires(post,postun) seems unnecessary accoding to > the URL above. (%post, %postun scriptlets are necessary), Fixed > * GTK+ icon cache > - No icons are installed under /usr/share/icons. Perhaps it is > better that > + create symlink under /usr/share/icons/hicolor/48x48/apps which > points to /usr/share/gresistor/icon.png > + fix (fedora-)gresistor.desktop > + and call gtk-update-icon-cache > Actually it already installs its own png at /usr/share/gresistor/icon.png, the use of GTK+ icon cache and touch --no-create %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor was to update gnome/kde menus just after the install of gresistor. Hence a kde/gnome restart is not required to update the icons in the gnome/kde menus. Updated http://chitlesh.funpic.de/rpm/gresistor.spec http://chitlesh.funpic.de/rpm/gresistor-0.0.1-6.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 4 11:16:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2006 07:16:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201674] Review Request: codeblocks In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609041116.k84BGXcK031645@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: codeblocks https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201674 ------- Additional Comments From dan at danny.cz 2006-09-04 07:16 EST ------- Updated SRPM URL: http://fedora.danny.cz/codeblocks-1.0-0.7.20060902svn2944.src.rpm Updated spec URL: http://fedora.danny.cz/codeblocks.spec Changes: - updated to revision 2944 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 4 11:26:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2006 07:26:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192441] Review Request: gset-compiz In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609041126.k84BQK6r032057@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gset-compiz https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192441 ------- Additional Comments From matthias at rpmforge.net 2006-09-04 07:26 EST ------- Just a few remarks (I'm not doing a formal review) : - The package doesn't include any license file, nor do the upstream sources... - Upstream isn't clear at all : Any official homepage? Download location? - The RPM is missing a libglade2-devel build requirement - The RPM is missing a GConf2-devel build requirement -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 4 11:55:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2006 07:55:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196120] Review Request: gresistor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609041155.k84BtPph000472@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gresistor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196120 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-09-04 07:55 EST ------- (In reply to comment #14) > Actually it already installs its own png at /usr/share/gresistor/icon.png, the > use of GTK+ icon cache and touch --no-create %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor was to > update gnome/kde menus just after the install of gresistor. > > Hence a kde/gnome restart is not required to update the icons in the gnome/kde > menus. Well, my opinition is that if this package uses a icon under /usr/share/gresistor, not under /usr/share/icons/hicolor, then touching /usr/share/icons/hicolor or recreating cache under /usr/share/icons/hicolor is not necessary. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 4 12:13:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2006 08:13:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204598] Review Request: geda-gschem - Electronics schematics editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609041213.k84CDVCj001296@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: geda-gschem - Electronics schematics editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204598 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2006-09-04 08:13 EST ------- Upstream contacted! http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1551925&group_id=161080&atid=818426 Will you approuved the package though? or rather opt for using an equivalent to geda-gschem, xcircuit though it hasn't the same features. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 4 12:28:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2006 08:28:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196120] Review Request: gresistor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609041228.k84CSxHK001764@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gresistor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196120 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2006-09-04 08:28 EST ------- Updated http://chitlesh.funpic.de/rpm/gresistor.spec http://chitlesh.funpic.de/rpm/gresistor-0.0.1-7.src.rpm I've opted for: * GTK+ icon cache - No icons are installed under /usr/share/icons. Perhaps it is better that + create symlink under /usr/share/icons/hicolor/48x48/apps which points to /usr/share/gresistor/icon.png + fix (fedora-)gresistor.desktop + and call gtk-update-icon-cache -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 4 12:46:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2006 08:46:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205127] New: Review Request: ekg - A client compatible with Gadu-Gadu Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205127 Summary: Review Request: ekg - A client compatible with Gadu-Gadu Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rpm at greysector.net QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://rpm.greysector.net/extras/ekg.spec SRPM URL: http://rpm.greysector.net/extras/ekg-1.7-0.1.rc2.src.rpm Description: EKG ("Eksperymentalny Klient Gadu-Gadu") is an open source gadu-gadu client for UNIX systems. Gadu-Gadu is an instant messaging program, very popular in Poland. NOTE: this package contains the libgadu library, which can be used by other Instant Messaging software. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 4 12:51:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2006 08:51:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200436] Review Request: gaim-gadugadu - Gadu-Gadu support in Gaim IM client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609041251.k84CpM4I002723@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gaim-gadugadu - Gadu-Gadu support in Gaim IM client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200436 raven at pmail.pl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |205127 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 4 12:57:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2006 08:57:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205043] Review Request: geda-gattrib - Attribute editor for gEDA In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609041257.k84CvJ4e002973@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: geda-gattrib - Attribute editor for gEDA https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205043 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2006-09-04 08:57 EST ------- Updated: Spec URL: http://chitlesh.funpic.de/rpm/geda-gattrib.spec SRPM URL: http://chitlesh.funpic.de/rpm/geda-gattrib-20060123-4.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 4 13:02:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2006 09:02:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205040] Review Request: geda-gnetlist - Netlister for the gEDA project In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609041302.k84D2mwH003316@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: geda-gnetlist - Netlister for the gEDA project https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205040 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2006-09-04 09:02 EST ------- Updated: Spec URL: http://chitlesh.funpic.de/rpm/geda-gnetlist.spec SRPM URL: http://chitlesh.funpic.de/rpm/geda-gnetlist-20060123-4.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 4 13:09:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2006 09:09:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203520] Review Request: evolution-brutus In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609041309.k84D94S1003785@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: evolution-brutus Alias: evolution-brutus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203520 colding at omesc.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|Package Review |OpenSceneGraph ------- Additional Comments From colding at omesc.com 2006-09-04 09:09 EST ------- Thank you for your input! I've put updated srpm and spec files on the site that addresses all of your #2 comments (except for your %makeinstall macro comment, what do you mean by that?). I'll install the newest FC6 beta tomorrow to have a go at your #2 comment. Spec URL: http://www.omesc.com/content/downloads/dist/Fedora%20Core%205/SPECS/evolution-brutus.spec SRPM URL: http://www.omesc.com/content/downloads/dist/Fedora%20Core%205/SRPMS/evolution-brutus-1.1.6-3.src.rpm Best regards, jules -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 4 13:09:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2006 09:09:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200348] Review Request: libgadu - Gadu-Gadu protocol support library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609041309.k84D9M7a003829@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgadu - Gadu-Gadu protocol support library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200348 ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2006-09-04 09:09 EST ------- Until such a time that libgadu is released separately from ekg and ekg is fixed to build agains external libgadu, Piotr and I have decided to derive libgadu from ekg. I've submitted ekg in bug 205127. When libgadu is released separately, we can revisit this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 4 13:10:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2006 09:10:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203520] Review Request: evolution-brutus In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609041310.k84DAJ3V003889@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: evolution-brutus Alias: evolution-brutus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203520 ------- Additional Comments From colding at omesc.com 2006-09-04 09:10 EST ------- Well, that should be #3 comment to get it compiling with e-d-s CVS HEAD. -- jules -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 4 13:48:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2006 09:48:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203520] Review Request: evolution-brutus In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609041348.k84DmAi1005357@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: evolution-brutus Alias: evolution-brutus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203520 ------- Additional Comments From sander at hoentjen.eu 2006-09-04 09:48 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > Thank you for your input! > > I've put updated srpm and spec files on the site that addresses all of your #2 > comments (except for your %makeinstall macro comment, what do you mean by > that?). http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-fcaf3e6fcbd51194a5d0dbcfbdd2fcb7791dd002 Also why are you building with: --enable-brutus-debug=no ? > I'll install the newest FC6 beta tomorrow to have a go at your #3 comment. Great > > Spec URL: > http://www.omesc.com/content/downloads/dist/Fedora%20Core%205/SPECS/evolution-brutus.spec > SRPM URL: > http://www.omesc.com/content/downloads/dist/Fedora%20Core%205/SRPMS/evolution-brutus-1.1.6-3.src.rpm > Don't forget to update the changelog each time you make changes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 4 13:54:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2006 09:54:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200348] Review Request: libgadu - Gadu-Gadu protocol support library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609041354.k84Ds0Yk005605@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgadu - Gadu-Gadu protocol support library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200348 rpm at greysector.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX OtherBugsDependingO|163776, 177841, 200436 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 4 13:54:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2006 09:54:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200436] Review Request: gaim-gadugadu - Gadu-Gadu support in Gaim IM client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609041354.k84DsWaE005675@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gaim-gadugadu - Gadu-Gadu support in Gaim IM client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200436 rpm at greysector.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn|200348 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 4 14:08:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2006 10:08:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196120] Review Request: gresistor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609041408.k84E8G1g006423@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gresistor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196120 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-09-04 10:08 EST ------- Well, I think that the name of "icon.png" is somewhat troublesome. Perhaps using "gresistor.png" is better to aboid comflict from other packages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 4 14:11:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2006 10:11:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205040] Review Request: geda-gnetlist - Netlister for the gEDA project In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609041411.k84EBB39006590@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: geda-gnetlist - Netlister for the gEDA project https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205040 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-09-04 10:11 EST ------- Okay. No problem. This package (geda-gnetlist) is now APPROVED by me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 4 14:30:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2006 10:30:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196120] Review Request: gresistor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609041430.k84EU0U7007436@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gresistor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196120 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2006-09-04 10:29 EST ------- Updated: Spec URL: http://beta.glwb.info/gresistor/gresistor.spec SRPM URL: http://beta.glwb.info/gresistor/gresistor-0.0.1-8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 4 14:44:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2006 10:44:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205043] Review Request: geda-gattrib - Attribute editor for gEDA In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609041444.k84EixNR008034@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: geda-gattrib - Attribute editor for gEDA https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205043 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-09-04 10:44 EST ------- Well; I just wondered why no icon are shown on Gattrib menu and I found the problem. Source1 has a typo: icon=gattrib should be Icon=gattrib . Just fix it. Then I recheck if a proper icon appears on Gattrib menu. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 4 14:56:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2006 10:56:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196120] Review Request: gresistor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609041456.k84EuVdv008538@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gresistor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196120 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-09-04 10:56 EST ------- Okay. No problem. I am pleased to say that this package (gresistor) is APPROVED by me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 4 15:03:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2006 11:03:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204125] Review Request: tremulous-data - Data files for tremulous the FPS game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609041503.k84F3mKa008881@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tremulous-data - Data files for tremulous the FPS game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204125 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-09-04 11:03 EST ------- I've made a new version whcih properly includes the copyright exception removal which makes this distributable: * Mon Sep 4 2006 Hans de Goede 1.1.0-2 - Add fedora-copyright.txt to %doc, which explains and contains the lifting of the shaderlab license exception, which makes this package distributable by Fedora Go get it here: Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/tremulous-data.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/tremulous-data-1.1.0-2.src.rpm For the copyright exception text see: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/tremulous-data-copyright.txt Can someone please review this now? Several people have requested this package from me and now its done nobody wants to review it, thats kinda frustrating. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 4 15:06:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2006 11:06:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205029] Review Request: autobuild-applet - a GNOME applet for monitoring Test-AutoBuild build status In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609041506.k84F6wIM008998@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: autobuild-applet - a GNOME applet for monitoring Test-AutoBuild build status https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205029 bdpepple at ameritech.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778, 177841 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at ameritech.net 2006-09-04 11:06 EST ------- MD5Sums: f199953fc6db531716ede26b2a096480 autobuild-applet-1.0.3.tar.gz Good: * Source URL is canonical * Upstream source tarball verified * Package name conforms to the Fedora Naming Guidelines * Group Tag is from the official list * Buildroot has all required elements * All paths begin with macros * All directories are owned by this or other packages * All necessary BuildRequires listed. * All desired features are enabled * Builds in mock fine Minor: * rpmlint gives the following error: W: autobuild-applet non-conffile-in-etc /etc/gconf/schemas/autobuild-applet.schemas +1 APPROVE, and I'll also be you sponsor. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/Contributors#head-bb3314e7b80fd98f037edd46f6d1efafbb611752 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 4 15:12:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2006 11:12:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204121] Review Request: tremulous - First Person Shooter game based on the Quake 3 engine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609041512.k84FCrTB009254@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tremulous - First Person Shooter game based on the Quake 3 engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204121 matthias at rpmforge.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |matthias at rpmforge.net OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 4 15:13:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2006 11:13:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204125] Review Request: tremulous-data - Data files for tremulous the FPS game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609041513.k84FDFRF009306@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tremulous-data - Data files for tremulous the FPS game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204125 matthias at rpmforge.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |matthias at rpmforge.net OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 4 15:20:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2006 11:20:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204598] Review Request: geda-gschem - Electronics schematics editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609041520.k84FK97u009637@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: geda-gschem - Electronics schematics editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204598 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-09-04 11:20 EST ------- Umm...??? Upstream closed this bug? Upstream says: This is the slice memory bug when running with gtk+ 2.8 or later. Fixed in new release of gEDA/gaf 20060824. Please upgrade -Ales .... What is gEDA/gaf? What component (released as Fedora Extras rpm) corresponds to gEDA/gaf? I would want to try it if it really fixes this SEGV problem. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 4 15:26:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2006 11:26:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204121] Review Request: tremulous - First Person Shooter game based on the Quake 3 engine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609041526.k84FQDum009947@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tremulous - First Person Shooter game based on the Quake 3 engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204121 matthias at rpmforge.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 4 15:29:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2006 11:29:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201502] Review Request: php-pear-PhpDocumentor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609041529.k84FTQme010066@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-PhpDocumentor Alias: phpDocumentor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201502 ------- Additional Comments From icon at fedoraproject.org 2006-09-04 11:29 EST ------- Okay, sorry for the delay. Here's the updated spec file and srpm: http://blues.mcgill.ca/~icon/fe/php-pear-PhpDocumentor.spec http://blues.mcgill.ca/~icon/fe/php-pear-PhpDocumentor-1.3.0-0.3.fc6.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 4 15:45:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2006 11:45:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188478] Review Request: fxload-2002_04_11.spec In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609041545.k84Fjc1o010550@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fxload-2002_04_11.spec https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188478 laurent.rineau__fedora_extras at normalesup.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From laurent.rineau__fedora_extras at normalesup.org 2006-09-04 11:45 EST ------- Well, no. *I* was sponsored in bug #190070, but the reporter of the current bug (fxload) is Neal Becker. In bug #191473, Hans de Goede has offered to Neal to be his sponsor, but he wants to review several requests of Neal, before. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 4 15:45:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2006 11:45:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205136] New: Review Request: gg2 - GNU Gadu 2 - free talking Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205136 Summary: Review Request: gg2 - GNU Gadu 2 - free talking Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rpm at greysector.net QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://rpm.greysector.net/extras/gg2.spec SRPM URL: http://rpm.greysector.net/extras/gg2-2.2.9-3.src.rpm Description: Gadu-Gadu, Tlen.pl and others instant messanger client with GTK+2 GUI. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 4 15:46:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2006 11:46:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205136] Review Request: gg2 - GNU Gadu 2 - free talking In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609041546.k84FkUuN010654@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gg2 - GNU Gadu 2 - free talking https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205136 rpm at greysector.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |205127 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 4 15:46:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2006 11:46:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205127] Review Request: ekg - A client compatible with Gadu-Gadu In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609041546.k84FkVTv010658@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ekg - A client compatible with Gadu-Gadu https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205127 rpm at greysector.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |205136 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 4 15:46:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2006 11:46:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204121] Review Request: tremulous - First Person Shooter game based on the Quake 3 engine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609041546.k84Fkoqp010684@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tremulous - First Person Shooter game based on the Quake 3 engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204121 ------- Additional Comments From matthias at rpmforge.net 2006-09-04 11:46 EST ------- Preliminary comments : - I would rename the tarball to something different from upstream in order to make it impossible to get both confused, ever. Something like %{name}-%{version}-src-nolcc.tar.gz maybe? - The desktop file needs tremulous.xpm changed to tremulous.png - You have -m64 in the BASE_CFLAGS set by your patch (probably unwanted even though the spec file overrides it) - Matthias takes two T's (%changelog) :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 4 15:55:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2006 11:55:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204125] Review Request: tremulous-data - Data files for tremulous the FPS game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609041555.k84FtC3v010983@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tremulous-data - Data files for tremulous the FPS game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204125 ------- Additional Comments From matthias at rpmforge.net 2006-09-04 11:55 EST ------- Preliminary comments : This notice seems like a leftover from a copy/paste of the main spec file : # this is basicly # http://dl.sourceforge.net/tremulous/tremulous-%{version}.zip # repackaged with tremulous-%{version}-src.tar.gz removed as that contains # non Free software (the lcc compiler). - Why do you hardcode the name and more importantly the version in the Source0 line? This can lead to the typical case where you increase the "Verrsion:" line but forget the Source0 one and the resulting package seems to be the new version when it's still the old ;-) Some people prefer like that, but in the main tremulous package you use %{version}. - The cp %{SOURCE1} fedora-copyright.txt should be replaced by "install -p -m 0644 %{SOURCE1} fedora-copyright.txt" since a wrong umask could lead to a world writeable file, like it has already happened in the Extras build system... - I'd suggest removing the %{?dist} from the release since this data can and should be shared across all releases (i.e. packages copied as-is for FC-5 and FC-6). - The %description should end with a dot :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 4 15:58:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2006 11:58:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203520] Review Request: evolution-brutus In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609041558.k84FwEGh011105@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: evolution-brutus Alias: evolution-brutus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203520 Christian.Iseli at licr.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|OpenSceneGraph |Package Review -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 4 16:10:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2006 12:10:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190101] Review Request: php-pear-Log In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609041610.k84GA8Vd011633@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Log Alias: php-pear-Log https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190101 ------- Additional Comments From Fedora at FamilleCollet.com 2006-09-04 12:10 EST ------- SPEC : http://remi.collet.free.fr/rpms/extras/php-pear-Log.spec SRPM : http://remi.collet.free.fr/rpms/extras/php-pear-Log-1.9.8-3.fc5.src.rpm Mock : http://remi.collet.free.fr/rpms/extras/php-pear-Log-build.log %changelog * Mon Sep 04 2006 Remi Collet 1.9.8-3 - new and simpler %%prep and %%install Note : i've also update php-pear-Mail and php-pear-HTTP (already approved) on the CVS. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 4 16:25:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2006 12:25:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193867] Review Request: klamav - Clam Anti-Virus on the KDE Desktop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609041625.k84GPEUn012203@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: klamav - Clam Anti-Virus on the KDE Desktop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193867 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2006-09-04 12:25 EST ------- * rpmlint warnings were not corrected chitlesh(~)[1]$rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-5-i386-core/result/klamav-0.38-2.fc5.i386.rpm W: klamav dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/klamav02/common ../common chitlesh(~)[1]$rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-5-i386-core/result/klamav- klamav-0.38-2.fc5.i386.rpm klamav-0.38-2.fc5.src.rpm klamav-debuginfo-0.38-2.fc5.i386.rpm chitlesh(~)[1]$rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-5-i386-core/result/klamav-debuginfo-0.38-2.fc5.i386.rpm E: klamav-debuginfo script-without-shellbang /usr/src/debug/klamav-0.38/src/klammail/client.c E: klamav-debuginfo script-without-shellbang /usr/src/debug/klamav-0.38/src/klammail/options.c E: klamav-debuginfo script-without-shellbang /usr/src/debug/klamav-0.38/src/klammail/options.h E: klamav-debuginfo script-without-shellbang /usr/src/debug/klamav-0.38/src/klammail/clamdmail.c E: klamav-debuginfo script-without-shellbang /usr/src/debug/klamav-0.38/src/klammail/treewalk.c * I've compared the rpmbuild output with the mock's build.log, it seems that when building with mock it generates more warnings than with rpmbuild. Do you know why? see attachment -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 4 16:26:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2006 12:26:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193867] Review Request: klamav - Clam Anti-Virus on the KDE Desktop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609041626.k84GQumj012237@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: klamav - Clam Anti-Virus on the KDE Desktop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193867 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2006-09-04 12:26 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=135503) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=135503&action=view) rpmbuild versus mock's build.log -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 4 16:33:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2006 12:33:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203774] Review Request: xcircuit - Electronic circuit schematic drawing program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609041633.k84GXc6w012530@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xcircuit - Electronic circuit schematic drawing program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203774 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-09-04 12:33 EST ------- Chitlesh, owner.list entry for xcircuit has a typo. It says "xcicuit". Please fix owner.list . http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/PackageStatus -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 4 16:34:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2006 12:34:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 181035] Review Request: luks-tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609041634.k84GYPWp012562@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: luks-tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=181035 ------- Additional Comments From Jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2006-09-04 12:34 EST ------- I will got the following complaint: Source luks-tools-0.0.9.tar.gz is different from upstream -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 4 16:41:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2006 12:41:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205138] New: Review Request: libjingle - GoogleTalk implementation of Jingle Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205138 Summary: Review Request: libjingle - GoogleTalk implementation of Jingle Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: bdpepple at ameritech.net QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://piedmont.homelinux.org/fedora/telepathy/libjingle.spec SRPM URL: http://piedmont.homelinux.org/fedora/telepathy/libjingle-0.3.10-1.src.rpm Description: Libjingle is Google Talk's implementation of Jingle and Jingle-Audio (proposed extensions to XMPP) to interoperate with Google Talk's peer-to-peer and voice calling capabilities. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 4 16:52:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2006 12:52:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190956] Review Request: php-pear-Auth-SASL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609041652.k84GqLdX013283@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Auth-SASL Alias: php-pear-Auth-SASL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190956 Fedora at FamilleCollet.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 4 16:52:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2006 12:52:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190958] Review Request: php-pear-Net-SMTP In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609041652.k84GqWwF013299@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Net-SMTP Alias: php-pear-Net-SMTP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190958 Bug 190958 depends on bug 190956, which changed state. Bug 190956 Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Auth-SASL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190956 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 4 16:53:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2006 12:53:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192583] Review Request: php-pear-XML-Parser - XML parsing class based on PHP's bundled expat In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609041653.k84GrMhE013400@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-XML-Parser - XML parsing class based on PHP's bundled expat Alias: php-pear-XML-Parser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192583 Fedora at FamilleCollet.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 4 16:53:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2006 12:53:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197420] Review Request: php-pear-Payment-Process - PEAR: Unified payment processor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609041653.k84Grjfm013464@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Payment-Process - PEAR: Unified payment processor Alias: pear-Payment-Process https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197420 Bug 197420 depends on bug 192583, which changed state. Bug 192583 Summary: Review Request: php-pear-XML-Parser - XML parsing class based on PHP's bundled expat https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192583 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 4 16:54:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2006 12:54:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190957] Review Request: php-pear-Net-Socket In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609041654.k84GsHj0013512@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Net-Socket Alias: php-pear-Net-Socket https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190957 Fedora at FamilleCollet.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 4 16:54:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2006 12:54:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190958] Review Request: php-pear-Net-SMTP In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609041654.k84GsUNe013524@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Net-SMTP Alias: php-pear-Net-SMTP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190958 Bug 190958 depends on bug 190957, which changed state. Bug 190957 Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Net-Socket https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190957 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 4 16:54:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2006 12:54:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190958] Review Request: php-pear-Net-SMTP In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609041654.k84Gsxj9013563@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Net-SMTP Alias: php-pear-Net-SMTP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190958 Fedora at FamilleCollet.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 4 17:04:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2006 13:04:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193867] Review Request: klamav - Clam Anti-Virus on the KDE Desktop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609041704.k84H4kgY013822@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: klamav - Clam Anti-Virus on the KDE Desktop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193867 ------- Additional Comments From andy at smile.org.ua 2006-09-04 13:04 EST ------- 1. 'common' link is a usual link for the KDE HTML documentation. I see two ways to resolve issue: - leave as is - make empty common directory and own in in the %files What solution do you advise? 2. Is it correct to check debuginfo packages by rpmlint? 3. About warnings. I guess the different compilators and/or different CFLAGS is used when compiled by mock and by rpmbuild. You may compare the cflags in such cases. The attached warnings are not affect to the result binary. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 4 17:10:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2006 13:10:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205066] Review Request: telepathy-python - Python package containing base and proxy classes for telepathy In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609041710.k84HAIZd013955@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: telepathy-python - Python package containing base and proxy classes for telepathy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205066 bdpepple at ameritech.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 4 17:11:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2006 13:11:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196793] Review Request: php-pear-MDB2 - PEAR: Database Abstraction Layer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609041711.k84HBRAn014019@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-MDB2 - PEAR: Database Abstraction Layer Alias: php-pear-MDB2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196793 ------- Additional Comments From Fedora at FamilleCollet.com 2006-09-04 13:11 EST ------- rpmlint is ok. build in mock succed. should not you upgrade to latest upstream version (2.2.2 stable) before release it ? Requires php version is 4.3.2. I think i could(will) do the review for you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 4 17:11:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2006 13:11:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204227] Review Request: foremost - Console program to recover files based on their headers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609041711.k84HBtgx014044@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: foremost - Console program to recover files based on their headers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204227 ------- Additional Comments From toshio at tiki-lounge.com 2006-09-04 13:11 EST ------- Hi, this package is already in Fedora Extras for FC4 on. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 4 17:15:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2006 13:15:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205127] Review Request: ekg - A client compatible with Gadu-Gadu In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609041715.k84HF8vM014185@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ekg - A client compatible with Gadu-Gadu https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205127 mr.ecik at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mr.ecik at gmail.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mr.ecik at gmail.com 2006-09-04 13:15 EST ------- Official review: MUST items: * rpmlint output: W: libgadu no-documentation * package is named good. * spec file is named good. * package almost meets Packaging Guidelines (it'll be defined later) * License field matches actual license * license is NOT included in %doc in libgadu * spec file is legible * md5sums are matching (b4ea482130e163af1456699e2e6983d9) * package successfully builds on x86_64 * build dependencies are properly listed in BuildRequires * no locales * package contains shared library files and package calls ldconfig in %post and %postun * package owns its directories * no duplicates in %files * correct %defattr lines * proper %clean section * no gui THINGS you have to do: * add %{?dist} tag to Release * add license file to libgadu package (COPYING is in lib directory) * remove python BR, because python-devel will add it If you fix what I mentioned above, I'll approve it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 4 17:18:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2006 13:18:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 181035] Review Request: luks-tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609041718.k84HIb95014440@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: luks-tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=181035 ------- Additional Comments From redhat at flyn.org 2006-09-04 13:18 EST ------- Luks-tools 0.0.10 is synchronized with the upstream version: Spec Name or Url: http://www.flyn.org/SRPMS/luks-tools.spec SRPM Name or Url: http://www.flyn.org/SRPMS/luks-tools-0.0.10-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 4 17:25:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2006 13:25:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202670] Review Request: bygfoot - Football Manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609041725.k84HPtCc014690@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bygfoot - Football Manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202670 mr.ecik at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From mr.ecik at gmail.com 2006-09-04 13:25 EST ------- I was on vacation. Now, I'm closing it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 4 17:30:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2006 13:30:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199627] Review Request: kooldock - dock for KDE with great visual effects and enhancements In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609041730.k84HUWlW014777@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kooldock - dock for KDE with great visual effects and enhancements https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199627 mr.ecik at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From mr.ecik at gmail.com 2006-09-04 13:30 EST ------- Closing it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 4 17:39:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2006 13:39:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203774] Review Request: xcircuit - Electronic circuit schematic drawing program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609041739.k84Hdb1X014986@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xcircuit - Electronic circuit schematic drawing program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203774 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2006-09-04 13:39 EST ------- Thanks Mamoru, you are simply great. I've corrected it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 4 17:45:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2006 13:45:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196591] Review Request: bitlbee In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609041745.k84HjifP015193@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bitlbee https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196591 ------- Additional Comments From redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de 2006-09-04 13:45 EST ------- Why should I enable 'ntsysv' variant of bitlbee? When reading bitlbee.conf, I think, I shouldn't do that (on the other hand: How to (re-)name two identical services to avoid confusions in /usr/sbin/ntsysv?): ## Inetd -- Run from inetd (default) ## Daemon -- Run as a stand-alone daemon -- EXPERIMENTAL! BitlBee is not yet ## stable enough to serve lots of users from one process. Because of this ## and other reasons, the use of daemon-mode is *STRONGLY* discouraged, ## don't even *think* of reporting bugs when you use this. I need "those perl calls" you mentioned in comment #14, to do a %makeinstall rather a couple of "install -mXYZ" like you are doing. Finally it saves nothing, so we could switch over when this makes you even more happy. Hmm...xmlto really seems to be required no longer, it's just a hangover from older times. Regarding the proxy stuff, could it be a problem openssl vs. gnutls? Personally, I would be happy if there's a technical reason to prefer openssl over gnutls ;-) Ah, adding an own user for bitlbee is a very good idea! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 4 18:33:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2006 14:33:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204121] Review Request: tremulous - First Person Shooter game based on the Quake 3 engine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609041833.k84IXx8m017417@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tremulous - First Person Shooter game based on the Quake 3 engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204121 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-09-04 14:33 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > Preliminary comments : > - I would rename the tarball to something different from upstream in order to > make it impossible to get both confused, ever. Something like > %{name}-%{version}-src-nolcc.tar.gz maybe? Done > - The desktop file needs tremulous.xpm changed to tremulous.png Fixed > - You have -m64 in the BASE_CFLAGS set by your patch (probably unwanted even > though the spec file overrides it) Hmm, that probably is a left over from your or Warts sed s/// approach to fixing the CFLAGS, its really harmless as it the affected part of the makefile only gets used on SunOS :) Anyways I've pruned this and a few other unneeded changes from the patch. > - Matthias takes two T's (%changelog) :-) Oops, fixed Here is a new version with all this fixed: Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/tremulous.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/tremulous-1.1.0-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 4 18:49:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2006 14:49:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 174021] Review Request: aplus-fsf - Advanced APL Interpreter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609041849.k84InYsv018553@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aplus-fsf - Advanced APL Interpreter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174021 ------- Additional Comments From Jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2006-09-04 14:49 EST ------- I have try to fix the reported problems for devel and FC-5. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 4 19:26:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2006 15:26:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205143] New: Review Request: perl-UNIVERSAL-require - Require() modules from a variable Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205143 Summary: Review Request: perl-UNIVERSAL-require - Require() modules from a variable Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: tcallawa at redhat.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/perl-UNIVERSAL-require.spec SRPM URL: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/perl-UNIVERSAL-require-0.10-1.src.rpm Description: Require() modules from a variable Note: This perl module used to be included with perl-UNIVERSAL-exports, but it is no longer. This module is a requirement for rt3. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 4 19:57:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2006 15:57:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205138] Review Request: libjingle - GoogleTalk implementation of Jingle In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609041957.k84JvsTQ021601@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libjingle - GoogleTalk implementation of Jingle https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205138 paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: libjingle - |Review Request: libjingle - |GoogleTalk implementation of|GoogleTalk implementation of |Jingle |Jingle Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 4 20:12:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2006 16:12:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204832] Review Request: wxMaxima - wxWidgets interface for maxima In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609042012.k84KCHMu022349@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wxMaxima - wxWidgets interface for maxima https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204832 gemi at bluewin.ch changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |gemi at bluewin.ch ------- Additional Comments From gemi at bluewin.ch 2006-09-04 16:12 EST ------- * builds fine in mock (FC5) * rename maxima-new.png to wxmaxima.png for clarity * COPYING and README are not necessary in /usr/share/wxMaxima * in the .desktop file: I think that there should be no X-Red-Hat* categories, but I may be wrong * I would change the description and summary a little, for example summary: Graphical user interface for Maxima description: A Graphical user interface for the computer algebra system Maxima using wxWidgets. This way, we also avoid starting the description with a lower case letter :-) Also, it emphasizes the "user interface", since the fact that it uses wxWidgets is not that important for most possible. Also the original text gives the impression that it was about wxWidgets bindings... * Help doesn't work: Cannot open HTML help book: /usr/share/maxima/5.9.3/doc/html/header.hhp Is there a .hhp help file somewhere in the maxima distribution? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 4 20:40:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2006 16:40:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205138] Review Request: libjingle - GoogleTalk implementation of Jingle In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609042040.k84Ke8vL023153@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libjingle - GoogleTalk implementation of Jingle https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205138 paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-09-04 16:39 EST ------- rpmlint output srpm W: mixed-spaces-and-tabs (ignorable) devel W: no-documentation (ignorable) mock builds fine o you have something I can link this against to test it? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 4 20:41:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2006 16:41:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205030] Review Request: atomix - Little mind game where you have to build molecules out of atoms lying around In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609042041.k84Kfe5V023238@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: atomix - Little mind game where you have to build molecules out of atoms lying around https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205030 paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 4 20:41:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2006 16:41:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204598] Review Request: geda-gschem - Electronics schematics editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609042041.k84Kfmt8023262@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: geda-gschem - Electronics schematics editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204598 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2006-09-04 16:41 EST ------- Updated: Spec URL: http://chitlesh.googlepages.com/geda-gschem.spec SRPM URL: http://chitlesh.googlepages.com/geda-gschem-20060824-1.src.rpm It doesn't segment on Exit (In reply to comment #11) > .... What is gEDA/gaf? What component (released as Fedora Extras > rpm) corresponds to gEDA/gaf? I would want to try it if it really > fixes this SEGV problem. gaf stands for ?gschem and friends?. It is a subset of the entire tool suite grouped together under the gEDA name. gEDA/gaf is a collection of tools which currently includes: * gschem: A schematic capture program * gnetlist: A netlist generation program * gsymcheck: A syntax checker for schematic symbols * gattrib: A spreadsheet programm that manipulates the properties of symbols of a schematic * libgeda: Libraries for gschem gnetlist and gsymcheck * gsch2pcb: Forward annotation from your schematic to layout using PCB. * some minor utils -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 4 20:50:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2006 16:50:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204598] Review Request: geda-gschem - Electronics schematics editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609042050.k84KoF7F023650@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: geda-gschem - Electronics schematics editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204598 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2006-09-04 16:50 EST ------- In case, mirrors haven't yet been updated: http://chitlesh.funpic.de/srpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 4 20:51:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2006 16:51:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196793] Review Request: php-pear-MDB2 - PEAR: Database Abstraction Layer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609042051.k84KpdY2023703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-MDB2 - PEAR: Database Abstraction Layer Alias: php-pear-MDB2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196793 ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2006-09-04 16:51 EST ------- Yes you are correct, I need to upgrade to 2.2.2 There are still a couple little things being ironed out on the template php spec, see https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198706 I'll do an upgrade in the next day or two with these changes for you to formally review. Then we can get php-pear-Log out. Discussions on Fedora packaging mailing list led to the agreement that if the package requires a php version of < 5.x then it's not needed because no supported Fedora distributions use a php version older than this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 4 20:51:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2006 16:51:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204601] Review Request: geda-examples - Circuit examples for gEDA In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609042051.k84Kpr2g023724@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: geda-examples - Circuit examples for gEDA https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204601 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2006-09-04 16:51 EST ------- Updated: Spec URL: http://chitlesh.funpic.de/rpm/geda-examples.spec SRPM URL: http://chitlesh.funpic.de/rpm/geda-examples-20060824-1.src.rpm New upstream release -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 4 20:52:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2006 16:52:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191590] Review Request: fluidsynth-dssi - a FluidSynth DSSI plugin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609042052.k84KqbYd023794@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fluidsynth-dssi - a FluidSynth DSSI plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191590 ------- Additional Comments From green at redhat.com 2006-09-04 16:52 EST ------- Thanks - I've updated the SRPM here: Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/green/FE/FC5/fluidsynth-dssi.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/green/FE/FC5/fluidsynth-dssi-0.9.1-3.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 4 21:01:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2006 17:01:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205043] Review Request: geda-gattrib - Attribute editor for gEDA In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609042101.k84L1Zxc024013@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: geda-gattrib - Attribute editor for gEDA https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205043 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2006-09-04 17:01 EST ------- Updated: Spec URL: http://chitlesh.funpic.de/rpm/geda-gattrib.spec SRPM URL: http://chitlesh.funpic.de/rpm/geda-gattrib-20060824-1.src.rpm Example: gattrib /usr/share/gEDA/examples/RF_Amp/RF_Amp/MSA-2643.sch -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 4 21:18:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2006 17:18:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205150] New: Review Request: gedda-docs - Documentation for gEDA Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205150 Summary: Review Request: gedda-docs - Documentation for gEDA Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cgoorah at yahoo.com.au QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://chitlesh.googlepages.com/geda-docs.spec SRPM URL: http://chitlesh.googlepages.com/geda-docs-20060824-1.src.rpm Description: This package contains documentation for the gEDA project. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 4 21:19:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2006 17:19:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205150] Review Request: gedda-docs - Documentation for gEDA In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609042119.k84LJwt4024536@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gedda-docs - Documentation for gEDA https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205150 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2006-09-04 17:19 EST ------- Sorry, typo in the title. title: geda-docs - Documentation for gEDA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 4 21:20:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2006 17:20:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177415] Review Request: geda-docs - documentation for gEDA project In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609042120.k84LKJYt024577@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: geda-docs - documentation for gEDA project https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177415 cgoorah at yahoo.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|WONTFIX |DUPLICATE ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2006-09-04 17:20 EST ------- http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/Policy/StalledReviews *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 205150 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 4 21:20:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2006 17:20:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205150] Review Request: gedda-docs - Documentation for gEDA In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609042120.k84LKWGb024595@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gedda-docs - Documentation for gEDA https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205150 cgoorah at yahoo.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |wk at ire.pw.edu.pl ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2006-09-04 17:20 EST ------- *** Bug 177415 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 4 21:30:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2006 17:30:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205138] Review Request: libjingle - GoogleTalk implementation of Jingle In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609042130.k84LUoC0024905@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libjingle - GoogleTalk implementation of Jingle https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205138 ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at ameritech.net 2006-09-04 17:30 EST ------- Not yet. Eventually, I'll be submitting farsight, but that will need some additional packages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 4 21:46:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2006 17:46:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205151] New: Review Request: geda-utils - Several utilities for the gEDA project Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205151 Summary: Review Request: geda-utils - Several utilities for the gEDA project Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cgoorah at yahoo.com.au QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Updated: Spec URL: http://chitlesh.funpic.de/rpm/geda-utils.spec SRPM URL: http://chitlesh.funpic.de/rpm/geda-utils-20060824-1.src.rpm Description: Several utilities for the gEDA project -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 4 21:50:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2006 17:50:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177115] Review Request: geda-utils - utilities for gEDA circuit design software In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609042150.k84Lo2Tm025338@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: geda-utils - utilities for gEDA circuit design software https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177115 cgoorah at yahoo.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|WONTFIX |DUPLICATE ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2006-09-04 17:49 EST ------- http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/Policy/StalledReviews *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 205151 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 4 21:50:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2006 17:50:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205151] Review Request: geda-utils - Several utilities for the gEDA project In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609042150.k84Lo4vC025351@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: geda-utils - Several utilities for the gEDA project https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205151 cgoorah at yahoo.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |wk at ire.pw.edu.pl ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2006-09-04 17:50 EST ------- *** Bug 177115 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 4 21:53:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2006 17:53:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205151] Review Request: geda-utils - Several utilities for the gEDA project In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609042153.k84LrZ3Y025489@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: geda-utils - Several utilities for the gEDA project https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205151 cgoorah at yahoo.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |205040 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 4 21:53:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2006 17:53:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205040] Review Request: geda-gnetlist - Netlister for the gEDA project In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609042153.k84Lrxch025526@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: geda-gnetlist - Netlister for the gEDA project https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205040 cgoorah at yahoo.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |205151 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 4 21:58:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2006 17:58:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200937] Review Request: FreqTweak, realtime audio spectral manipulation (& Jack client) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609042158.k84LwGAT025595@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: FreqTweak, realtime audio spectral manipulation (& Jack client) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200937 ------- Additional Comments From green at redhat.com 2006-09-04 17:58 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=135515) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=135515&action=view) screenshot Sorry for the long delay. This builds on rawhide if I force fc5 = 1. It would be nice if we could special case <=fc4 and just let >=fc5 not require macro tests. I don't get black buttons on rawhide, which is great, but they still don't render perfectly - see attached. Poking at the code, I think this is a FreqTweak bug and shouldn't prevent us from getting this packaged into rawhide at least. I'm going to continue with the review for rawhide (the fc5 black buttons is still a mystery). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 4 22:00:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2006 18:00:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204259] Review Request: geda - Project manager for gEDA In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609042200.k84M0sAE025651@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: geda - Project manager for gEDA https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204259 cgoorah at yahoo.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2006-09-04 18:00 EST ------- The geda (gManager) source tarball is not longer being distributed. All the code is still in the CVS repository, but due to lack of maintanance, it has been pulled for these snapshot releases. http://www.geda.seul.org/devel/20060824/gaf-20060824-relnotes.html I'm closing this bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 4 22:28:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2006 18:28:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190029] Review Request: whysynth-dssi - DSSI software synthesizer plugin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609042228.k84MSrBU026249@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: whysynth-dssi - DSSI software synthesizer plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190029 ------- Additional Comments From green at redhat.com 2006-09-04 18:28 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > Here are some comments from me: > > rpmlint shows some errors: > > W: whysynth-dssi incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.1.3-3 20060122-3.fc5 > > last changelog entry mentions version 0.1.3-3 but the package is 20060122-3, > the other entries may have the wrong version, too. Fixed > W: whysynth-dssi dangling-symlink /usr/bin/whysynth /usr/bin/jack-dssi-host > > Don't know, what this means. This is OK. It's a symlink to something that isn't in this RPM. > W: whysynth-dssi > symlink-should-be-relative /usr/bin/whysynth /usr/bin/jack-dssi-host > > Make sure, the symlink is relative. Fixed. > W: whysynth-dssi macro-in-%changelog __rm > W: whysynth-dssi macro-in-%changelog makeinstall > > Macros mentioned in %changelog must be escaped with an %, e.g. %%{__rm} > instead of %{__rm} Fixed. > Package builds in mock, but there are some warnigs in the build log: I'm ignoring these for now. Tweaking compile options may possibly result in better performance. Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/green/FE/FC5/whysynth-dssi.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/green/FE/FC5/whysynth-dssi-20060122-3.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 4 22:30:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2006 18:30:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190029] Review Request: whysynth-dssi - DSSI software synthesizer plugin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609042230.k84MUg91026307@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: whysynth-dssi - DSSI software synthesizer plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190029 ------- Additional Comments From green at redhat.com 2006-09-04 18:30 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > You use > %defattr(-,root,root) > instead of > %defattr(-,root,root,-) > - is this intentionally? No - fixed. > Why is there no desktop file as in > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191590 ? If you add it, > please not inline but in an extra file. There's no icon. I'll create one. It's still not in the SPEC file I've posted. > > Why do you use '%makeinstall' instead of the favoured 'make install > DESTDIR="$RPM_BUILD_ROOT"'? Fixed. Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/green/FE/FC5/whysynth-dssi.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/green/FE/FC5/whysynth-dssi-20060122-4.src.rpm (which is what I meant to write in my previous reply) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 4 22:51:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2006 18:51:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190029] Review Request: whysynth-dssi - DSSI software synthesizer plugin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609042251.k84Mp6jJ026785@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: whysynth-dssi - DSSI software synthesizer plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190029 ------- Additional Comments From green at redhat.com 2006-09-04 18:51 EST ------- This version has a .desktop file and icons. Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/green/FE/FC5/whysynth-dssi.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/green/FE/FC5/whysynth-dssi-20060122-5.src.rpm Thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 4 22:58:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2006 18:58:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193867] Review Request: klamav - Clam Anti-Virus on the KDE Desktop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609042258.k84MwpMx027026@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: klamav - Clam Anti-Virus on the KDE Desktop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193867 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2006-09-04 18:58 EST ------- (In reply to comment #17) > 1. 'common' link is a usual link for the KDE HTML documentation. > I see two ways to resolve issue: > - leave as is > - make empty common directory and own in in the %files > What solution do you advise? > The rpmlint warning is safe to ignore; %_docdir/HTML/en/common is owned by kdelibs, which is a dependency (via libkdecore.so.4). Hence, leave as is > 2. Is it correct to check debuginfo packages by rpmlint? you should check all rpms. update your srpm and spec file -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 4 23:35:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2006 19:35:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200941] Review Request: SooperLooper, a realtime software looping sampler (&Jack client) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609042335.k84NZMmH027876@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: SooperLooper, a realtime software looping sampler (&Jack client) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200941 ------- Additional Comments From green at redhat.com 2006-09-04 19:35 EST ------- I'm updating the -devel versions of my libraries (dssi, liblo, etc) to Require pkgconfig as per the recent decision. This should also solve the mock build problem here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 5 02:21:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2006 22:21:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197765] Review Request: libical - A library for parsing iCal component In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609050221.k852Lesk032756@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libical - A library for parsing iCal component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197765 toshio at tiki-lounge.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |toshio at tiki-lounge.com ------- Additional Comments From toshio at tiki-lounge.com 2006-09-04 22:21 EST ------- Hope upstream is still alive or it'll start to look like the libical name is cursed :-) Have you tried Omar's email directly? The Version-Release string doesn't look right to me. You have: Version: 0.26.6 Release: 0.1.aurore%{?dist} The tarball is libical-0.26-6.aurore.tar.bz2 The tarball unzips to: libical-0.26 This isn't definitive but maybe: Version: 0.26 Release: 0.1.6.aurore%{?dist} More Licensing Woes: src/libical/icallangbind.c src/libical/icallangbind.h (C) COPYRIGHT 1999 Eric Busboom http://www.softwarestudio.org This package is free software and is provided "as is" without express or implied warranty. It may be used, redistributed and/or modified under the same terms as perl itself. ( Either the Artistic License or the GPL. ) The README says dual licensed LGPL/MPL but this conflicts.... Probably Eric Busboom needs to be contacted to see if he relicensed the library at some point and this was an oversight. hula uses an embedded copy of libical-0.24 so I'd like to see an active upstream that I can tell the hula developers they should start porting to. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 5 04:06:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 00:06:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205143] Review Request: perl-UNIVERSAL-require - Require() modules from a variable In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609050406.k8546nwO007028@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-UNIVERSAL-require - Require() modules from a variable https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205143 rc040203 at freenet.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |rc040203 at freenet.de OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2006-09-05 00:06 EST ------- APPROVED. Without this package, rt3 can't be installed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 5 04:12:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 00:12:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 168690] Review Request: pyBackPack (GTK+ Python backup tool) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609050412.k854C9QC007282@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyBackPack (GTK+ Python backup tool) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=168690 andy at andrewprice.me.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |andy at andrewprice.me.uk ------- Additional Comments From andy at andrewprice.me.uk 2006-09-05 00:11 EST ------- Just for the record, I've taken pybackpack off Dave's hands and have started development of it again. I'm not overly familiar with Fedora's package process and I'll be doing my development mainly on Ubuntu but I'd just like to reverse Dave's "consider it dead" comment and reassure you that the package is still alive and kicking. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 5 04:17:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 00:17:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 168690] Review Request: pyBackPack (GTK+ Python backup tool) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609050417.k854H1qM007487@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyBackPack (GTK+ Python backup tool) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=168690 ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2006-09-05 00:17 EST ------- Great. If you can fix the bug in comment #15, I'll continue to help test. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 5 04:32:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 00:32:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205143] Review Request: perl-UNIVERSAL-require - Require() modules from a variable In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609050432.k854WKKZ007995@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-UNIVERSAL-require - Require() modules from a variable https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205143 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2006-09-05 00:32 EST ------- Please don't forget to add branches for all Fedora branches you have released perl-UNIVERSAL-exports with UNIVERSAL::require removed. AFAIS, this covers FE4, FE5 and devel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 5 06:16:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 02:16:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204125] Review Request: tremulous-data - Data files for tremulous the FPS game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609050616.k856G81J011715@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tremulous-data - Data files for tremulous the FPS game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204125 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-09-05 02:16 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > Preliminary comments : > > This notice seems like a leftover from a copy/paste of the main spec file : > # this is basicly > # http://dl.sourceforge.net/tremulous/tremulous-%{version}.zip > # repackaged with tremulous-%{version}-src.tar.gz removed as that contains > # non Free software (the lcc compiler). > Nope, in tremolous.spec it says: # this is %{name}-%{version}-src.tar.gz as containted in: # http://dl.sourceforge.net/%{name}/%{name}-%{version}.zip # with the src/tools/lcc dir removed as that contains non Free software Notice the subtile difference, which makes each explain prettty exact what the tarbal is and how it was created. > - Why do you hardcode the name and more importantly the version in the Source0 > line? This can lead to the typical case where you increase the "Verrsion:" line > but forget the Source0 one and the resulting package seems to be the new version > when it's still the old ;-) Some people prefer like that, but in the main > tremulous package you use %{version}. I dunno why I did that, fixed. > - The cp %{SOURCE1} fedora-copyright.txt should be replaced by "install -p -m > 0644 %{SOURCE1} fedora-copyright.txt" since a wrong umask could lead to a world > writeable file, like it has already happened in the Extras build system... Fixed > - I'd suggest removing the %{?dist} from the release since this data can and > should be shared across all releases (i.e. packages copied as-is for FC-5 and FC-6). > - The %description should end with a dot :-) Good point, done. Here is a new spec file, I didn't upload a new SRPM as that is huge: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/tremulous-data.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 5 07:08:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 03:08:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204598] Review Request: geda-gschem - Electronics schematics editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609050708.k8578inD013853@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: geda-gschem - Electronics schematics editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204598 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-09-05 03:08 EST ------- Okay. No SEGV. Now this package is APPROVED by me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 5 07:13:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 03:13:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205150] Review Request: geda-docs - Documentation for gEDA In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609050713.k857D7DU014077@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: geda-docs - Documentation for gEDA https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205150 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: gedda-docs -|Review Request: geda-docs - |Documentation for gEDA |Documentation for gEDA Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 5 07:31:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 03:31:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205043] Review Request: geda-gattrib - Attribute editor for gEDA In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609050731.k857V4n9014946@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: geda-gattrib - Attribute editor for gEDA https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205043 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-09-05 03:31 EST ------- Well... [tasaka1 at dhcp151 geda-gattrib]$ gattrib /usr/share/gEDA/examples/RF_Amp/RF_Amp/MSA-2643.sch gEDA/gattrib version 20060824 gEDA/gattrib comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY; see COPYING for more details. This is free software, and you are welcome to redistribute it under certain conditions; please see the COPYING file for more details. Loading file [/usr/share/gEDA/examples/RF_Amp] Couldn't load schematic [/usr/share/gEDA/examples/RF_Amp] No components found in entire design! Do you have refdeses on your components? Exiting. . . . What does this mean? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 5 07:51:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 03:51:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204227] Review Request: foremost - Console program to recover files based on their headers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609050751.k857pMUP016215@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: foremost - Console program to recover files based on their headers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204227 ------- Additional Comments From fedora-devel at mx-solutions.de 2006-09-05 03:51 EST ------- hm, iam using FC5 and in the Extras Repo didn't find it. What have i to do now? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 5 07:51:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 03:51:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204601] Review Request: geda-examples - Circuit examples for gEDA In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609050751.k857pXnx016232@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: geda-examples - Circuit examples for gEDA https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204601 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-09-05 03:51 EST ------- OKay. Second review: * rpmlint issue Well, this package bears no rpmlint complaint, however, some files have Windows-type end-of-type encoding. add: for f in `find . -name \*.mod -or -name \*.cir -or -name \*.netlist | sort` ; do sed -i -e 's|\r||' $f ; done to %prep stage. I want to recheck this package once more. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 5 08:14:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 04:14:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205150] Review Request: geda-docs - Documentation for gEDA In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609050814.k858EmjQ018373@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: geda-docs - Documentation for gEDA https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205150 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-09-05 04:14 EST ------- One question: What is /usr/share/gEDA/docs/wiki/lib/tpl/default/images/favicon ? [tasaka1 at dhcp151 geda-docs]$ file ./geda-docs-20060824-1.fc6/usr/share/gEDA/docs/wiki/lib/tpl/default/images/favicon ./geda-docs-20060824-1.fc6/usr/share/gEDA/docs/wiki/lib/tpl/default/images/favicon: MPEG sequence Is this a mpeg file? (If this is really mpeg file, this file should be removed, perhaps). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 5 08:15:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 04:15:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203520] Review Request: evolution-brutus In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609050815.k858FmN2018497@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: evolution-brutus Alias: evolution-brutus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203520 ------- Additional Comments From colding at omesc.com 2006-09-05 04:15 EST ------- > > I've put updated srpm and spec files on the site that addresses all of your #2 > > comments (except for your %makeinstall macro comment, what do you mean by > > that?). > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-fcaf3e6fcbd51194a5d0dbcfbdd2fcb7791dd002 OK, I've fixed that in the spec. > Also why are you building with: --enable-brutus-debug=no ? brutus-debug is an internal configure variable that explicitly appends "-ggdb -O1" to CFLAGS and defines BRUTUS_DEBUG. A lot of debug output is printed to stdout when BRUTUS_DEBUG is defined in the source and the environment has BRUTUS_DEBUG defined to something, e.g. "yes". brutus-debug is therefore disabled during rpm build. "-g -O2" is appended to CFLAGS during rpm build so the debuginfo rpms contain the symbols. This srpm and spec has all the updates: Spec URL: http://www.omesc.com/content/downloads/dist/Fedora%20Core%205/SPECS/evolution-brutus.spec SRPM URL: http://www.omesc.com/content/downloads/dist/Fedora%20Core%205/SRPMS/evolution-brutus-1.1.6-4.src.rpm > Don't forget to update the changelog each time you make changes. Yes, I've missed that. The 1.1.6-4 srpm/spec has updated Changelog entries. Thanks, jules -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 5 09:20:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 05:20:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204121] Review Request: tremulous - First Person Shooter game based on the Quake 3 engine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609050920.k859KCAk022879@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tremulous - First Person Shooter game based on the Quake 3 engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204121 matthias at rpmforge.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From matthias at rpmforge.net 2006-09-05 05:20 EST ------- Great. Formal review now :-) - rpmlint is silent, good - fully GPL licensed, with GPL compatible bits, good - name, spec file, sources seem all fine, good - builds fine on both i386 and x86_64, good - runs fine (menu, start a new server, enter the game), good All other MUST/SHOULD items seem good too... APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 5 09:28:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 05:28:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202006] Review Request: fmio - FM radio card manipulation utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609050928.k859SHAZ023685@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fmio - FM radio card manipulation utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202006 ------- Additional Comments From andy at smile.org.ua 2006-09-05 05:28 EST ------- Some cites from mailings mainstream vs. me. Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2006 10:19:32 +0400 (MSD) From: "Vladimir Popov" Sender: jumbo at narod.ru Message-Id: <44FBC574.000008.14011 at mfront8.yandex.ru> To: andy at asplinux.com.ua Subject: Re: fmio vs. contribution and licensing ... > Can you put Licence file to the site or/and in tarball? You can generate the license file during the build process, see utils/ license.sh. ... > And similar question about my patches. I'm afraid there will be no future releases. fmio does anything it can on boxes with a single card. I have some ideas but can't test them. So no future releases. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 5 09:30:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 05:30:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205151] Review Request: geda-utils - Several utilities for the gEDA project In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609050930.k859UhIY023917@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: geda-utils - Several utilities for the gEDA project https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205151 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 5 09:33:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 05:33:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203212] Review Request: libgalago-gtk In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609050933.k859X0Fm024165@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgalago-gtk https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203212 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |panemade at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-09-05 05:32 EST ------- {Not Official Reviewer} packaging looks ok. + Mockbuild is successfull for i386 FC6 + rpmlint on binary rpm is silent + dist tag is present + Buildroot is correct - source URL is Wrong + BR is correct + License used is LGPL + License file COPYING is included + devel package is handled correctly - MD5 sum on tarball is matching upstream tarball source tarball name is libgalago-gtk in SPEC whereas upstream tarball name is libgalago only. + No duplicate files Not tested package -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 5 09:33:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 05:33:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204125] Review Request: tremulous-data - Data files for tremulous the FPS game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609050933.k859Xcn9024241@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tremulous-data - Data files for tremulous the FPS game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204125 matthias at rpmforge.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From matthias at rpmforge.net 2006-09-05 05:33 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > Nope, in tremolous.spec it says: > # this is %{name}-%{version}-src.tar.gz as containted in: > # http://dl.sourceforge.net/%{name}/%{name}-%{version}.zip > # with the src/tools/lcc dir removed as that contains non Free software > > Notice the subtile difference, which makes each explain prettty exact what the > tarbal is and how it was created. Sorry, I got confused. I see what you mean now. I still don't see any dot at the end of the %description :-) Anyway, here we go for the formal review. - License is CC Attribution-ShareAlike, which falls into the "binary firmware" exception, since it is redistribuable and doesn't have any commercial use restrictions, good - rpmlint complains only about the License, good - Spec file seems fine, three minor nitpicks : - The Source1 "tremulous-copyright.txt" gets installed as "fedora-copyright.txt", why two different names? - Maybe you should uncomment the %build line, even though the section is empty, since IIRC not having %build has already caused weird things to happen. - It's "basically", not "basicly". - Builds and runs (with the main tremulous of course) fine, good Most other MUST/SHOULD don't apply, so for me the package is APPROVED. Don't forget to build it only for a single distro and request the packages to be copied over in order to save space on mirror server (hardlinks) and during upgrades. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 5 09:47:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 05:47:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202006] Review Request: fmio - FM radio card manipulation utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609050947.k859lfhg025156@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fmio - FM radio card manipulation utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202006 ------- Additional Comments From andy at smile.org.ua 2006-09-05 05:47 EST ------- Generate LICENSE file on the fly as mainstream advise. Updated file here: ftp://andriy.asplinux.com.ua/pub/people/andy/extras/fmio-2.0.8-6.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 5 09:56:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 05:56:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203520] Review Request: evolution-brutus In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609050956.k859uP6O025555@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: evolution-brutus Alias: evolution-brutus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203520 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-09-05 05:56 EST ------- I just checked if this package (-1.1.6-4) can be rebuilt, however, it failed in mock. + ./configure --build=i686-redhat-linux-gnu --host=i686-redhat-linux-gnu --target=i386-redhat-linux-gnu --program-prefix= --prefix=/usr --exec-pr efix=/usr --bindir=/usr/bin --sbindir=/usr/sbin --sysconfdir=/etc --datadir=/usr/share --includedir=/usr/include --libdir=/usr/lib --libexecdir=/ usr/libexec --localstatedir=/var --sharedstatedir=/usr/com --mandir=/usr/share/man --infodir=/usr/share/info --enable-brutus-dist=yes --enable-br utus-debug=no --enable-brutus-devel=yes --enable-brutus-spy=no checking for a BSD-compatible install... /usr/bin/install -c checking whether build environment is sane... yes checking for gawk... gawk checking whether make sets $(MAKE)... yes ./configure: line 2122: evolution: command not found checking Evolution Data Server version... 1.7 configure: error: Unsupported version of Evolution Data Server. Please report this to . error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.53931 (%build) RPM build errors: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.53931 (%build) Error building package from evolution-brutus-1.1.6-4.src.rpm, See build log Check the BuildRequires. Also, as the comment #3 , if this package cannot be rebuilt with evolution-data-server-1.7.92 , this package cannot be released because Fedora Extras packages has to be rebuilt under devel environment first. Also, you have to add %{?dist} to release. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 5 10:08:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 06:08:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205023] Review Request: filelight-1.0 - cool diskspace use browser for kde In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609051008.k85A8SbT026163@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: filelight-1.0 - cool diskspace use browser for kde https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205023 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |panemade at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-09-05 06:08 EST ------- {Not official reviewer} + Mockbuild is successfull for i386 FC6 with messages No translations found for filelight in /var/tmp/filelight-1.0-1-root don't use %files -f %{name}.lang use only %files in SPEC file - rpmlint on SOURCE rpm is NOT silent I: filelight checking W: filelight hardcoded-packager-tag Dag The Packager tag is hardcoded in your spec file. It should be removed, so as to use rebuilder's own defaults. => Remove packager tag W: filelight setup-not-quiet You should use -q to have a quiet extraction of the source tarball, as this generate useless lines of log ( for buildbot, for example ) packaging looks ok. => use setup -q instead of setup only You need to replace %prep section to %prep %setup -q -n %{name}-%{version} + dist tag is NOT present - Buildroot is Must be %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) + source URL is correct + BR is correct + License used is GPL + License file COPYING is included - Desktop files are NOT handled correctly. Check http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-254ddf07aae20a23ced8cecc219d8f73926e9755 + MD5 sum on tarball is matching upstream tarball aa885e53e09f40e7fdd371395140b957 filelight-1.0.tar.bz2 - rpmlint on Binary RPM is NOT silent E: filelight file-in-usr-marked-as-conffile /usr/share/config/filelightrc A file in /usr is marked as being a configuration file. Store your conf files in /etc/ instead. W: filelight conffile-without-noreplace-flag /usr/share/config/filelightrc A configuration file is stored in your package without the noreplace flag. A way to resolve this is to put the following in your SPEC file: %config(noreplace) /etc/your_config_file_here Follow comment #1 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 5 10:20:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 06:20:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205151] Review Request: geda-utils - Several utilities for the gEDA project In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609051020.k85AKAuL026866@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: geda-utils - Several utilities for the gEDA project https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205151 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-09-05 06:20 EST ------- First review of geda-utils. 1. From http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines : * Requires: - My opinition is, if geda-gnetlist is neeeded only for %{_datadir}/gEDA/docs/readmes/ ownership issue, then geda-symbols should own this directory and the requirement for geda-gnetlist can be removed (and if do so, the file entry in geda-gnetlist should be: %{gedadocdir}/readmes/* ) 2. From http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines : = Nothing. 3. Other things I have noticed: = Nothing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 5 10:23:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 06:23:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204954] Review Request: libofa - Open Fingerprint Architecture library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609051023.k85ANS2T027136@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libofa - Open Fingerprint Architecture library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204954 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |panemade at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-09-05 06:23 EST ------- {Not Official Reviewer} packaging looks ok in SPEC. - Mockbuild is FAILED for i386 FC6 JAMA/tnt_math_utils.h:33: error: call of overloaded 'abs(const float&)' is ambiguous /usr/include/stdlib.h:786: note: candidates are: int abs(int) /usr/lib/gcc/i386-redhat-linux/4.1.1/../../../../include/c++/4.1.1/cstdlib:172: note: long long int __gnu_cxx::abs(long long int) /usr/lib/gcc/i386-redhat-linux/4.1.1/../../../../include/c++/4.1.1/cstdlib:142: note: long int std::abs(long int) make[3]: *** [mainprint.lo] Error 1 make[3]: Leaving directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/libofa-0.9.3/lib' make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 + dist tag is present + Buildroot is correct - source URL is NOT working + License used is GPL + License file COPYING is included + Devel package is handled correclty in SPEC - No upstream tarball available to verify its MD5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 5 10:24:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 06:24:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202356] Review Request: terminus-font - Clean fixed width font In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609051024.k85AOL1q027195@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: terminus-font - Clean fixed width font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202356 rhbugs at n-dimensional.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 5 10:56:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 06:56:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203520] Review Request: evolution-brutus In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609051056.k85AuISl029186@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: evolution-brutus Alias: evolution-brutus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203520 ------- Additional Comments From colding at omesc.com 2006-09-05 06:56 EST ------- I'm current installing the latest fc6 beta to fix the build issue with eds 1.7. One thing though,,, now that Evolution 2.8 is out do I have to support the 2.7 development release? I'll add %{?dist} to release later today. Thanks, jules -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 5 11:11:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 07:11:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204416] Review Request: libtelepathy - library to ease writing of telepathy clients In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609051111.k85BBnwb030073@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libtelepathy - library to ease writing of telepathy clients https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204416 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |panemade at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-09-05 07:11 EST ------- {Not Official Reviewer} packaging looks ok. + Mockbuild is successfull for i386 FC6 + rpmlint on binary rpm is silent + dist tag is present + Buildroot is correct + source URL is correct + BR is correct + License used is GPL + License file COPYING is included + devel package is handled correctly + MD5 sum on tarball is matching upstream tarball 31e24aed049c60aa18a47cbc19a1d69e libtelepathy-0.0.31.tar.gz + No duplicate files Not tested package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 5 11:21:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 07:21:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201656] Review Request: gstm-1.2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609051121.k85BL4H3030644@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gstm-1.2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201656 ------- Additional Comments From laurent.rineau__fedora_extras at normalesup.org 2006-09-05 07:21 EST ------- Damien, could you remove gstm from owners.list, until this package is fully accepted (maybe soon)? gstm has been reported bogus in the last "FE package status" mail. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 5 11:29:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 07:29:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205023] Review Request: filelight-1.0 - cool diskspace use browser for kde In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609051129.k85BT1OB031015@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: filelight-1.0 - cool diskspace use browser for kde https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205023 ------- Additional Comments From ndbecker2 at verizon.net 2006-09-05 07:29 EST ------- All fixed (hopefully). Please try: http://nbecker.dyndns.org:8080/RPM/filelight-1.0-2.src.rpm http://nbecker.dyndns.org:8080/RPM/filelight.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 5 11:30:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 07:30:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204975] Review Request: vigra - Generic Programming for Computer Vision In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609051130.k85BUHvr031069@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vigra - Generic Programming for Computer Vision https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204975 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: vigra - |Review Request: vigra - |Generic Programming for |Generic Programming for |Computer Vision |Computer Vision CC| |panemade at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-09-05 07:30 EST ------- {Not Official Reviewer} - rpmlint on SOURCE rpm is NOT silent rpmlint -iv vigra-1.4.0-1.src.rpm I: vigra checking W: vigra invalid-license MIT/X11 The value of the License tag is invalid. Valid values are: "Academic Free License", "Adaptive Public License", "Apache License", "Apache Software License", "Apple Public Source License", "Artistic", "Attribution Assurance License", "BSD", "Computer Associates Trusted Open Source License", "CDDL", "CPL", "CUA Office Public License", "EU DataGrid Software License", "Eclipse Public License", "Educational Community License", "Eiffel Forum License", "Entessa Public License", "Fair License", "Frameworx License", "GPL", "LGPL", "Historical Permission Notice and Disclaimer", "IBM Public License", "Intel Open Source License", "Jabber Open Source License", "Lucent Public License", "MIT", "CVW License", "Motosoto License", "MPL", "NASA Open Source Agreement", "Naumen Public License", "Nethack General Public License", "Nokia Open Source License", "OCLC Research Public License", "Open Group Test Suite License", "Open Software License", "PHP License", "Python license", "Python Software Foundation License", "QPL", "RealNetworks Public Source License", "Reciprocal Public License", "Ricoh Source Code Public License", "Sleepycat License", "Sun Industry Standards Source License", "Sun Public License", "Sybase Open Watcom Public License", "University of Illinois/NCSA Open Source License", "Vovida Software License", "W3C License", "wxWindows Library License", "X.Net License", "Zope Public License", "zlib License", "Design Public License", "GFDL", "LaTeX Project Public License", "OpenContent License", "Open Publication License", "Public Domain", "Ruby License", "SIL Open Font License", "Charityware", "Commercial", "Distributable", "Freeware", "Non-distributable", "Proprietary", "Shareware". If the license is close to an existing one, you can use ' style'. => I think you better write MIT only in License tag W: vigra rpm-buildroot-usage %build --docdir=%{buildroot}/usr/share/doc/%{name}-%{version} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT should not be touched during %build or %prep stage, as it will break short circuiting. E: vigra configure-without-libdir-spec A configure script is run without specifying the libdir. configure options must be augmented with something like --libdir=%{_libdir}. Many things need to be considered in this package SPCE file. I have modified SPEC file will post it -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 5 11:56:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 07:56:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205023] Review Request: filelight-1.0 - cool diskspace use browser for kde In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609051156.k85BuEWI032235@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: filelight-1.0 - cool diskspace use browser for kde https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205023 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-09-05 07:56 EST ------- More to do in SPEC Add %{?dist} to Release tag Release: 2%{?dist} Remove macros used in %chnagelog section otherwise rpmlint on src.rpm will NOT be silent I: filelight checking W: filelight macro-in-%changelog files Macros are expanded in %changelog too, which can in unfortunate cases lead to the package not building at all, or other subtle unexpected conditions that affect the build. Even when that doesn't happen, the expansion results in possibly "rewriting history" on subsequent package revisions and generally odd entries eg. in source rpms, which is rarely wanted. Avoid use of macros in %changelog altogether, or use two '%'s to escape them, like '%%foo'. W: filelight macro-in-%changelog _sysconfdir Macros are expanded in %changelog too, which can in unfortunate cases lead to the package not building at all, or other subtle unexpected conditions that affect the build. Even when that doesn't happen, the expansion results in possibly "rewriting history" on subsequent package revisions and generally odd entries eg. in source rpms, which is rarely wanted. Avoid use of macros in %changelog altogether, or use two '%'s to escape them, like '%%foo'. On Binary RPM rpmlint is silent Still desktop file is not handled properly add --delete-original option to desktop-file-install what is second filelight_part.desktop ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 5 11:57:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 07:57:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205023] Review Request: filelight-1.0 - cool diskspace use browser for kde In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609051157.k85Bvm06032290@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: filelight-1.0 - cool diskspace use browser for kde https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205023 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-09-05 07:57 EST ------- Also tell me what is use of placing filelight_part.desktop in %{_datadir}/services/filelight_part.desktop path? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 5 12:03:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 08:03:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205023] Review Request: filelight-1.0 - cool diskspace use browser for kde In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609051203.k85C3pb0032682@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: filelight-1.0 - cool diskspace use browser for kde https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205023 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-09-05 08:03 EST ------- Re: comment #5 It's a reference to a runtime-loadable kpart (ie, KDE plugin). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 5 12:07:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 08:07:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205023] Review Request: filelight-1.0 - cool diskspace use browser for kde In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609051207.k85C7aR9000417@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: filelight-1.0 - cool diskspace use browser for kde https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205023 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-09-05 08:07 EST ------- ok -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 5 12:14:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 08:14:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203520] Review Request: evolution-brutus In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609051214.k85CEB7x000745@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: evolution-brutus Alias: evolution-brutus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203520 ------- Additional Comments From sander at hoentjen.eu 2006-09-05 08:14 EST ------- (In reply to comment #9) > One thing though,,, now that Evolution 2.8 is out do I have to support the 2.7 > development release? Well, Fedora Core devel still has e-d-s 1.7, but since 1.8 is out I suspect it will be packaged soon. If you want to know for sure you can contact mbarnes, who is the packager of e-d-s at the moment. But since the changes will be minimal between 1.7.92 and 1.8 if you support one, you will probably support both. In short: make sure you support 1.8, then 1.7 support should be trivial and perhaps not needed if e-d-s is updated soon enough -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 5 12:52:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 08:52:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205023] Review Request: filelight-1.0 - cool diskspace use browser for kde In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609051252.k85Cq3WD002622@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: filelight-1.0 - cool diskspace use browser for kde https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205023 ------- Additional Comments From ndbecker2 at verizon.net 2006-09-05 08:52 EST ------- All fixed, but: "add --delete-original option to desktop-file-install" doesn't seem to be mentioned here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines http://nbecker.dyndns.org:8080/RPM/filelight-1.0-3.src.rpm http://nbecker.dyndns.org:8080/RPM/filelight.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 5 12:53:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 08:53:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204832] Review Request: wxMaxima - wxWidgets interface for maxima In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609051253.k85Cr1nx002732@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wxMaxima - wxWidgets interface for maxima https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204832 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-09-05 08:52 EST ------- > I think that there should be no X-Red-Hat* categories I agree. > * Help doesn't work: I'd venture to guess this bit may require maxima-5.9.3.99 (or better). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 5 13:02:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 09:02:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205023] Review Request: filelight-1.0 - cool diskspace use browser for kde In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609051302.k85D2coP003281@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: filelight-1.0 - cool diskspace use browser for kde https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205023 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-09-05 09:02 EST ------- this option is ised only when final binary rpm will contains duplicate .desktop files Like in your case before using desktop-file-install final binary rpm was installing desktop file to location /usr/share/applications/kde/filelight.desktop as its part of make install but when you used desktop-file-install same desktop file will get installed again with path /usr/share/applications/fedora-filelight.desktop Now to remove duplicate files use --delete-original that will delete file /usr/share/applications/kde/filelight.desktop so final binary RPM will contain only /usr/share/applications/fedora-filelight.desktop -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 5 13:07:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 09:07:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205023] Review Request: filelight-1.0 - cool diskspace use browser for kde In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609051307.k85D70c3003466@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: filelight-1.0 - cool diskspace use browser for kde https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205023 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-09-05 09:06 EST ------- OTOH, the original rationale for adding --vendor=fedora is when there isn't an upstream .desktop file, but that's not true in this case. I'd recommend instead using something (simpler) like this instead: desktop-file-install \ --dir ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}%{_datadir}/applications/kde \ --add-category="X-Fedora" --vendor="" \ ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}%{_datadir}/applications/kde/filelight.desktop -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 5 13:08:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 09:08:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204832] Review Request: wxMaxima - wxWidgets interface for maxima In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609051308.k85D8Mow003546@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wxMaxima - wxWidgets interface for maxima https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204832 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-09-05 09:08 EST ------- Spec Name or Url: http://apt.kde-redhat.org/apt/fedora/SPECS/wxMaxima.spec SRPM Name or Url: http://apt.kde-redhat.org/apt/fedora/all/SRPMS.stable/wxMaxima-0.7.0-2.src.rpm %changelog * Tue Sep 05 2006 Rex Dieter 0.7.0-2 - update %%description, %%summary - rename icon -> wxmaxima.png - omit extraneous COPYING, README - .desktop: remove X-Red-Hat* categories -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 5 13:10:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 09:10:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205023] Review Request: filelight-1.0 - cool diskspace use browser for kde In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609051310.k85DAipr003651@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: filelight-1.0 - cool diskspace use browser for kde https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205023 ------- Additional Comments From ndbecker2 at verizon.net 2006-09-05 09:10 EST ------- I think moving filelightrc from %{_datadir}/config to {_sysconfdir} was a mistake. I think it should be put back. But without %config. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 5 13:20:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 09:20:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203212] Review Request: libgalago-gtk In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609051320.k85DKW4F004196@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgalago-gtk https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203212 ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at ameritech.net 2006-09-05 09:20 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > - source URL is Wrong Uhmm, no. http://www.galago-project.org/files/releases/source/libgalago-gtk/libgalago-gtk-0.5.0.tar.bz2, which is the same as the spec file. > - MD5 sum on tarball is matching upstream tarball > source tarball name is libgalago-gtk in SPEC whereas upstream tarball name is libgalago only. Uhmm, no again. The name of the tarball is libgalago-gtk-0.5.0.tar.bz2, which matches the spec file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 5 13:22:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 09:22:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204975] Review Request: vigra - Generic Programming for Computer Vision In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609051322.k85DMj8E004276@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vigra - Generic Programming for Computer Vision https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204975 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-09-05 09:22 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=135554) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=135554&action=view) Check this SPEC file with some corrections Update SRPM and post here -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 5 13:25:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 09:25:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204975] Review Request: vigra - Generic Programming for Computer Vision In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609051325.k85DPwuM004475@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vigra - Generic Programming for Computer Vision https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204975 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #135554|0 |1 is obsolete| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 5 13:26:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 09:26:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204975] Review Request: vigra - Generic Programming for Computer Vision In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609051326.k85DQqgV004506@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vigra - Generic Programming for Computer Vision https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204975 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-09-05 09:26 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=135555) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=135555&action=view) Updated SPEC for you -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 5 13:39:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 09:39:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203212] Review Request: libgalago-gtk In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609051339.k85Dd3Fj005200@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgalago-gtk https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203212 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-09-05 09:38 EST ------- ohh sorry something i did mistakenly. First with wget command it failed and when i check actual URL i wrongly clicked on libgalago dir instead libgalago-gtk. anyway there is no problem in packaging. SOURCE URL matches upstream tarball with 20e809869ec764efb2259ee0d0dee263 libgalago-gtk-0.5.0.tar.bz2 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 5 13:49:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 09:49:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205043] Review Request: geda-gattrib - Attribute editor for gEDA In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609051349.k85DnuwJ006021@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: geda-gattrib - Attribute editor for gEDA https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205043 sdb at cloud9.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |sdb at cloud9.net ------- Additional Comments From sdb at cloud9.net 2006-09-05 09:49 EST ------- I am the author of this program. Well... [tasaka1 at dhcp151 geda-gattrib]$ gattrib /usr/share/gEDA/examples/RF_Amp/RF_Amp/MSA-2643.sch gEDA/gattrib version 20060824 gEDA/gattrib comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY; see COPYING for more details. This is free software, and you are welcome to redistribute it under certain conditions; please see the COPYING file for more details. Loading file [/usr/share/gEDA/examples/RF_Amp] Couldn't load schematic [/usr/share/gEDA/examples/RF_Amp] No components found in entire design! Do you have refdeses on your components? Exiting. . . . What does this mean? This is the correct behavior. You tried loading a non-existant file. The path "/usr/share/gEDA/examples/RF_Amp/RF_Amp/MSA-2643.sch" probably doesn't exist. You probably want "/usr/share/gEDA/examples/RF_Amp/MSA-2643.sch" (remove one RF_Amp from diretory list). In general, gattrib will try to open your .sch file and look for valid components. If it can't find then, it will bail out with the above error message. I agree that the error message might be improved to say "file not found" in this case. I can add that to the list of improvements I intend to do. Stuart Brorson -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 5 14:02:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 10:02:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201656] Review Request: gstm-1.2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609051402.k85E2bIl007258@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gstm-1.2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201656 ------- Additional Comments From splinux25 at gmail.com 2006-09-05 10:02 EST ------- Sorry, I've been busy a while. You'll find a new spec and srpm where %description and %datadir/pixmaps have been fixed. spec: http://glive.tuxfamily.org/fedora/gstm/gstm.spec srpm: http://glive.tuxfamily.org/fedora/gstm/gstm-1.2-5.fc6.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 5 14:09:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 10:09:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188435] Review Request: glibrary-1.0.1 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609051409.k85E92lZ007749@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glibrary-1.0.1 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188435 splinux25 at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CANTFIX ------- Additional Comments From splinux25 at gmail.com 2006-09-05 10:08 EST ------- This project is dead, I close this report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 5 14:11:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 10:11:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205023] Review Request: filelight-1.0 - cool diskspace use browser for kde In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609051411.k85EBqrB007924@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: filelight-1.0 - cool diskspace use browser for kde https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205023 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-09-05 10:11 EST ------- Right, kde *expects* %{_datadir}/config, and, imo, it is still appropriate to mark it %config, despite what rpmlint says. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 5 14:14:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 10:14:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203520] Review Request: evolution-brutus In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609051414.k85EEwiS008300@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: evolution-brutus Alias: evolution-brutus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203520 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-09-05 10:14 EST ------- (In reply to comment #10) > Well, Fedora Core devel still has e-d-s 1.7, but since 1.8 is out I suspect it > will be packaged soon. Actually, rawhide today has evolution-data-server-1.8.0-1.fc6 . So at least this package should have the support for evolution-data-server-1.8, otherwise this package cannot be accepted, I suppose. Also, libglade2-devel evolution e2fsprogs-devel is missing for BuildRequires (checked by mock) Note: even after I install the missing BR packages above and make some "version trick" on configure, I still cannot rebuild this package against evolution-data-server-devel-1.8.0-1.fc6 with following error: e-cal-backend-brutus.c: In function 'brutus_backend_construct': e-cal-backend-brutus.c:672: error: too few arguments to function 'e_cal_backend_cache_new' -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 5 14:18:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 10:18:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205043] Review Request: geda-gattrib - Attribute editor for gEDA In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609051418.k85EIpwV008783@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: geda-gattrib - Attribute editor for gEDA https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205043 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-09-05 10:18 EST ------- (In reply to comment #7) > This is the correct behavior. You tried loading a non-existant file. The > path "/usr/share/gEDA/examples/RF_Amp/RF_Amp/MSA-2643.sch" probably doesn't > exist. You probably want "/usr/share/gEDA/examples/RF_Amp/MSA-2643.sch" > (remove one RF_Amp from diretory list). > > In general, gattrib will try to open your .sch file and look for valid > components. If it can't find then, it will bail out with the above error > message.> > I agree that the error message might be improved to say "file not found" in > this case. I can add that to the list of improvements I intend to do. > > Stuart Brorson > Hello, Stuart. Oops... Actually /usr/share/gEDA/examples/RF_Amp/RF_Amp/MSA-2643.sch wasn't exist... my bad...... Well, I installed geda-examples (I have not accepted geda-examples yet) and it seems to go right. Okay, then I recheck this package again. Thank you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 5 14:29:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 10:29:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204601] Review Request: geda-examples - Circuit examples for gEDA In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609051429.k85ETVtd009924@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: geda-examples - Circuit examples for gEDA https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204601 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2006-09-05 10:29 EST ------- Updated: Spec URL: http://chitlesh.funpic.de/rpm/geda-examples.spec SRPM URL: http://chitlesh.funpic.de/rpm/geda-examples-20060824-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 5 14:43:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 10:43:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196120] Review Request: gresistor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609051443.k85Eh59n011247@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gresistor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196120 cgoorah at yahoo.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 5 14:43:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 10:43:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205040] Review Request: geda-gnetlist - Netlister for the gEDA project In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609051443.k85EhGjd011288@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: geda-gnetlist - Netlister for the gEDA project https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205040 cgoorah at yahoo.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 5 14:43:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 10:43:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205151] Review Request: geda-utils - Several utilities for the gEDA project In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609051443.k85EhRRK011365@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: geda-utils - Several utilities for the gEDA project https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205151 Bug 205151 depends on bug 205040, which changed state. Bug 205040 Summary: Review Request: geda-gnetlist - Netlister for the gEDA project https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205040 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 5 14:43:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 10:43:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204598] Review Request: geda-gschem - Electronics schematics editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609051443.k85EhJ61011335@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: geda-gschem - Electronics schematics editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204598 cgoorah at yahoo.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 5 14:43:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 10:43:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204601] Review Request: geda-examples - Circuit examples for gEDA In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609051443.k85EhqUK011460@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: geda-examples - Circuit examples for gEDA https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204601 Bug 204601 depends on bug 204598, which changed state. Bug 204598 Summary: Review Request: geda-gschem - Electronics schematics editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204598 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 5 14:58:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 10:58:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205150] Review Request: geda-docs - Documentation for gEDA In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609051458.k85EwpXo012665@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: geda-docs - Documentation for gEDA https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205150 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2006-09-05 10:58 EST ------- updated: Spec URL: http://chitlesh.googlepages.com/geda-docs.spec SRPM URL: http://chitlesh.googlepages.com/geda-docs-20060824-2.src.rpm I've opted the removal of favicon, but however upstream will be contacted. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 5 15:00:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 11:00:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204601] Review Request: geda-examples - Circuit examples for gEDA In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609051500.k85F0nZ6012859@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: geda-examples - Circuit examples for gEDA https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204601 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-09-05 11:00 EST ------- Well, doing "sed" before "%setup -q" (expanding src) does nothing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 5 15:05:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 11:05:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205043] Review Request: geda-gattrib - Attribute editor for gEDA In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609051505.k85F5jsB013426@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: geda-gattrib - Attribute editor for gEDA https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205043 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-09-05 11:05 EST ------- Okay. No problem. This package (geda-gattrib) is APPROVED by me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 5 15:06:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 11:06:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204832] Review Request: wxMaxima - wxWidgets interface for maxima In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609051506.k85F6KIA013488@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wxMaxima - wxWidgets interface for maxima https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204832 ------- Additional Comments From gemi at bluewin.ch 2006-09-05 11:05 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > > I think that there should be no X-Red-Hat* categories > > I agree. > > > * Help doesn't work: > I'd venture to guess this bit may require maxima-5.9.3.99 (or better). I see that this version is in FE development. Would you building it for FE5? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 5 15:08:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 11:08:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204601] Review Request: geda-examples - Circuit examples for gEDA In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609051508.k85F8etX013653@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: geda-examples - Circuit examples for gEDA https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204601 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2006-09-05 11:08 EST ------- pdated: Spec URL: http://chitlesh.funpic.de/rpm/geda-examples.spec SRPM URL: http://chitlesh.funpic.de/rpm/geda-examples-20060824-3.src.rpm Corrected stupid mistake ! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 5 15:09:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 11:09:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204832] Review Request: wxMaxima - wxWidgets interface for maxima In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609051509.k85F9dU9013711@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wxMaxima - wxWidgets interface for maxima https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204832 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-09-05 11:09 EST ------- >>> * Help doesn't work: >> I'd venture to guess this bit may require maxima-5.9.3.99 (or better). > I see that this version is in FE development. Would you building > it for FE5? I've been waiting for 5.9.4(final) before pushing a maxima update to any non-devel repo. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 5 15:21:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 11:21:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188435] Review Request: glibrary-1.0.1 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609051521.k85FLcWW015435@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glibrary-1.0.1 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188435 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163779 |201449 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 5 15:27:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 11:27:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204601] Review Request: geda-examples - Circuit examples for gEDA In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609051527.k85FR0AF016267@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: geda-examples - Circuit examples for gEDA https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204601 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-09-05 11:26 EST ------- Well, another question: This package seems to have some empty directories: /usr/share/gEDA/examples/RF_Amp/model /usr/share/gEDA/examples/RF_Amp/sym /usr/share/gEDA/examples/TwoStageAmp/sym /usr/share/gEDA/examples/lightning_detector/sym What are these directories for? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 5 15:30:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 11:30:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205143] Review Request: perl-UNIVERSAL-require - Require() modules from a variable In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609051530.k85FUrAI017031@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-UNIVERSAL-require - Require() modules from a variable https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205143 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2006-09-05 11:30 EST ------- Built for all dists. Closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 5 15:36:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 11:36:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205150] Review Request: geda-docs - Documentation for gEDA In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609051536.k85FaZC8017731@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: geda-docs - Documentation for gEDA https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205150 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-09-05 11:36 EST ------- Okay. This package (geda-docs) is APPROVED by me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 5 15:49:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 11:49:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205249] New: Review Request: perl-Data-OptList - Parse and validate simple name/value option pairs Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205249 Summary: Review Request: perl-Data-OptList - Parse and validate simple name/value option pairs Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Data-OptList/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com SRPM URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-Data-OptList-0.101-1.fc5.src.rpm SPEC URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-Data-OptList.spec Description: Hashes are great for storing named data, but if you want more than one entry for a name, you have to use a list of pairs. Even then, this is really boring to write: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 5 15:49:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 11:49:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205249] Review Request: perl-Data-OptList - Parse and validate simple name/value option pairs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609051549.k85Fnr4G018751@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Data-OptList - Parse and validate simple name/value option pairs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205249 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |205062 OtherBugsDependingO| |163776 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 5 15:50:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 11:50:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205062] Review Request: perl-Sub-Install - Install subroutines into packages easily In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609051550.k85Fo7ND018781@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Sub-Install - Install subroutines into packages easily https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205062 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |205249 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 5 16:04:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 12:04:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205151] Review Request: geda-utils - Several utilities for the gEDA project In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609051604.k85G41ws020560@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: geda-utils - Several utilities for the gEDA project https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205151 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2006-09-05 12:03 EST ------- Updated: Spec URL: http://chitlesh.funpic.de/rpm/geda-utils.spec SRPM URL: http://chitlesh.funpic.de/rpm/geda-utils-20060824-2.src.rpm Removal of ownership of directory %%{_datadir}/gEDA/docs/readmes/ on geda-gnetlist geda-symbols and geda-gnetlist are both updated and committed http://buildsys.fedoraproject.org/build-status/success.psp -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 5 16:15:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 12:15:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204975] Review Request: vigra - Generic Programming for Computer Vision In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609051615.k85GFDac021275@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vigra - Generic Programming for Computer Vision https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204975 ------- Additional Comments From bruno at postle.net 2006-09-05 12:15 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > Updated SPEC for you Thanks, I've applied the changes, fixed the license and a couple of typos: Spec URL: http://bugbear.blackfish.org.uk/~bruno/apt/SPECS/vigra.spec SRPM URL: http://bugbear.blackfish.org.uk/~bruno/apt/fedora/linux/5/x86_64/SRPMS.panorama/vigra-1.4.0-2.fc5.src.rpm I also put the documentation back in the -devel package as this is really developer information and there is a lot of it - Should it go in a -doc subpackage instead? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 5 16:43:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 12:43:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205151] Review Request: geda-utils - Several utilities for the gEDA project In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609051643.k85GhJG3023782@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: geda-utils - Several utilities for the gEDA project https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205151 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-09-05 12:43 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > Removal of ownership of directory %%{_datadir}/gEDA/docs/readmes/ on geda-gnetlist > > geda-symbols and geda-gnetlist are both updated and committed > http://buildsys.fedoraproject.org/build-status/success.psp I have checked these, which is reasonable. > Updated: > Spec URL: http://chitlesh.funpic.de/rpm/geda-utils.spec > SRPM URL: http://chitlesh.funpic.de/rpm/geda-utils-20060824-2.src.rpm > Now this package (geda-utils) is APPROVED by me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 5 16:45:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 12:45:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205151] Review Request: geda-utils - Several utilities for the gEDA project In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609051645.k85Gj7P4023966@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: geda-utils - Several utilities for the gEDA project https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205151 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn|205040 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 5 16:45:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 12:45:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205040] Review Request: geda-gnetlist - Netlister for the gEDA project In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609051645.k85GjBY7023994@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: geda-gnetlist - Netlister for the gEDA project https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205040 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|205151 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 5 17:00:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 13:00:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 175127] Review Request: wavbreaker - Tool for splitting .wav files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609051700.k85H0mbM025638@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wavbreaker - Tool for splitting .wav files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175127 ------- Additional Comments From dmaley at redhat.com 2006-09-05 13:00 EST ------- Doesn't seem Adrian's around ... ? Should I add this to the FE-NEEDSPONSOR bug to solicit another sponsor? Or is there a different procedure seeing as how it's already on FE-ACCEPT? Thanks for all the help thus far. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 5 17:07:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 13:07:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200937] Review Request: FreqTweak, realtime audio spectral manipulation (& Jack client) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609051707.k85H7lKH026321@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: FreqTweak, realtime audio spectral manipulation (& Jack client) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200937 ------- Additional Comments From nando at ccrma.stanford.edu 2006-09-05 13:07 EST ------- (In reply to comment #14) > Created an attachment (id=135515) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=135515&action=view) [edit] > screenshot > > Sorry for the long delay. This builds on rawhide if I force fc5 = 1. It would > be nice if we could special case <=fc4 and just let >=fc5 not require macro > tests. > > I don't get black buttons on rawhide, which is great, but they still don't > render perfectly - see attached. That's exactly what I see when building and running (successfully here) on fc5. It'd be great to find the bug for the font size problem. > Poking at the code, I think this is a > FreqTweak bug and shouldn't prevent us from getting this packaged into rawhide > at least. I'm going to continue with the review for rawhide (the fc5 black > buttons is still a mystery). Yep, sorry, I have not had time to try to debug this yet. Must be a library version somewhere. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 5 17:12:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 13:12:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 195365] Review Request: etcnet - /etc/net network configuration system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609051712.k85HCimc027074@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: etcnet - /etc/net network configuration system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195365 ------- Additional Comments From linux at pilot.org.ua 2006-09-05 13:12 EST ------- The short answer would be "there is a point". I am continuing my work. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 5 17:23:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 13:23:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201873] Review Request: wmix - Dockapp mixer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609051723.k85HNCiP028595@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wmix - Dockapp mixer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201873 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-09-05 13:23 EST ------- I was away... Built, added to comps, omwners. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 5 17:33:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 13:33:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205265] New: Review Request: libxml- Old libXML library for Gnome-1 application compatibility Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205265 Summary: Review Request: libxml- Old libXML library for Gnome-1 application compatibility Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: paul at city-fan.org QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.city-fan.org/~paul/extras/Gnome-1/libxml.spec SRPM URL: http://www.city-fan.org/~paul/extras/Gnome-1/libxml-1.8.17-14.src.rpm Description: This library allows old Gnome-1 applications to manipulate XML files. This package was removed from Core for FC6 and I am submitting it to Extras to support the people that still need it for legacy applications. I used recent rawhide SRPM and then tweaked it for Extras and to suit my own cosmetic preferences. Reviewers may consider using rpmdiff to compare the built packages with the versions in Fedora Core 5. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 5 17:36:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 13:36:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198244] Review Request: libglade In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609051736.k85Habn3031015@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libglade https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198244 paul at city-fan.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |205265 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 5 17:36:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 13:36:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205265] Review Request: libxml- Old libXML library for Gnome-1 application compatibility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609051736.k85HamVF031048@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libxml- Old libXML library for Gnome-1 application compatibility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205265 paul at city-fan.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |198244 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 5 17:45:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 13:45:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205267] New: Review Request: perl-Package-Generator - Generate new packages quickly and easily Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205267 Summary: Review Request: perl-Package-Generator - Generate new packages quickly and easily Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Package-Generator/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com SRPM URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-Package-Generator-0.100-1.fc5.src.rpm SPEC URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-Package-Generator.spec Description: This module lets you quickly and easily construct new packages. It gives them unused names and sets up their package data, if provided. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 5 17:45:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 13:45:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205267] Review Request: perl-Package-Generator - Generate new packages quickly and easily In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609051745.k85Hjv90000302@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Package-Generator - Generate new packages quickly and easily https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205267 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |163776 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 5 17:49:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 13:49:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205269] New: Review Request: perl-Sub-Exporter - Sophisticated exporter for custom-built routines Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205269 Summary: Review Request: perl-Sub-Exporter - Sophisticated exporter for custom-built routines Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Sub-Exporter/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com SRPM URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-Sub-Exporter-0.970-1.fc5.src.rpm SPEC URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-Sub-Exporter.spec Description: Sub::Exporter provides a sophisticated alternative to Exporter.pm. It allows for renaming, currying/sub-generation, and other cool stuff. ACHTUNG! If you're not familiar with Exporter or exporting, read Sub::Exporter::Tutorial first! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 5 17:49:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 13:49:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205269] Review Request: perl-Sub-Exporter - Sophisticated exporter for custom-built routines In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609051749.k85HnKYd000968@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Sub-Exporter - Sophisticated exporter for custom-built routines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205269 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |205249, 205267 OtherBugsDependingO| |163776 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 5 17:49:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 13:49:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205249] Review Request: perl-Data-OptList - Parse and validate simple name/value option pairs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609051749.k85HnVPB001001@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Data-OptList - Parse and validate simple name/value option pairs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205249 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |205269 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 5 17:49:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 13:49:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205267] Review Request: perl-Package-Generator - Generate new packages quickly and easily In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609051749.k85HnWdg001022@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Package-Generator - Generate new packages quickly and easily https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205267 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |205269 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 5 17:57:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 13:57:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205041] Review Request: tellico - collection manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609051757.k85HvLTj002556@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tellico - collection manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205041 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-09-05 13:57 EST ------- All the changes look good. I don't feel strongly about having KDE in the Summary. I am using the package under Xfce, so it works fine here. It's worth noting that due to bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202944 I had to install 28 -devel packages to install this. Thats not this packages fault however. ;) Some new rpmlint errors (or perhaps ones I missed the first time): E: tellico binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/tellico ['/usr/lib', '/usr/ lib/qt-3.3/lib'] Suggestion: perhaps add '--disable-rpath' to the configure line? W: tellico dangling-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/tellico/common /usr/share/ doc/HTML/en/common W: tellico symlink-should-be-relative /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/tellico/common / usr/share/doc/HTML/en/common W: tellico dangling-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/fr/tellico/common /usr/share/ doc/HTML/fr/common W: tellico symlink-should-be-relative /usr/share/doc/HTML/fr/tellico/common / usr/share/doc/HTML/fr/common Suggestion: change to relative symlinks? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 5 18:04:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 14:04:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193059] Review Request: ibmasm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609051804.k85I4Uav003466@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ibmasm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193059 ------- Additional Comments From konradr at redhat.com 2006-09-05 14:04 EST ------- (In reply to comment #23) > Builds cleanly, rpmlint complains on the -devel package Oh, I completly forgot to run rpmlint on the -devel package. Thank you for spotting that. > > W: summary-ended-with-dot > E: summary-too-long > W: no-docs (not worried by) > E: script-without-shellbank %{_includedir}/ibmasm/rsa.h and libibmasm.h > > The errors need fixing (the last one is probably just a case of setting the > permission to 644 for each file) Done. > > Not building in mock > > Executing /usr/sbin/mock-helper chroot > /var/lib/mock/fedora-development-i386-core/root /sbin/runuser - root -c > "/sbin/runuser -c 'rpmbuild -ba --target i386 --nodeps > /builddir/build/SPECS/ibmasm.spec' mockbuild" > error: File /builddir/build/SOURCES/ibmasm_user_3.0-9.fc6.tar.bz2: No such file > or directory > > (this could well be my system, but it's working on other packages correctly) This is due to: Release: 9%{?dist} and Source0: ibmasm_user_%{version}-%{release}.tar.bz Should I just remove the %{?dist} out? I decided to do that for the .10 release. It can always be changed back, or there can be two types of Release: tags? Here is the 3.0-10 release with fixes. SPEC URL:http://ibmasm.cvs.sourceforge.net/*checkout*/ibmasm/ibmasm/ibmasm.spec SRPMS URL: http://osdn.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/ibmasm/ibmasm-3.0-10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 5 18:10:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 14:10:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202006] Review Request: fmio - FM radio card manipulation utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609051810.k85IAKok004001@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fmio - FM radio card manipulation utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202006 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-09-05 14:10 EST ------- All those changes look ok. 1. The new version doesn't build under mock however: + install -p -m 644 '%{SOURCE3}' LICENSE install: cannot stat `%{SOURCE3}': No such file or directory error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.2437 (%install) Looks like you have a old 'install -p -m 644 '%{SOURCE3}' LICENSE' in there from before you were generating the license via the license.sh script. 2. I'm not seeing the libfmio.so be installed with execute perms still: W: fmio unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib/libradio.so 3. Also in the build log: groff -Tascii -mandoc wmfmio.1 > wmfmio.0 /bin/sh: groff: command not found Perhaps a "BuildRequires: groff" missing? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 5 18:13:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 14:13:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203217] Review Request: csound - music synthesis system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609051813.k85ID7tj004463@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: csound - music synthesis system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203217 dcbw at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From dcbw at redhat.com 2006-09-05 14:13 EST ------- imported. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 5 18:22:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 14:22:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205269] Review Request: perl-Sub-Exporter - Sophisticated exporter for custom-built routines In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609051822.k85IMU1u005747@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Sub-Exporter - Sophisticated exporter for custom-built routines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205269 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |205062 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 5 18:22:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 14:22:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205062] Review Request: perl-Sub-Install - Install subroutines into packages easily In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609051822.k85IMVVH005753@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Sub-Install - Install subroutines into packages easily https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205062 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |205269 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 5 18:28:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 14:28:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 175127] Review Request: wavbreaker - Tool for splitting .wav files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609051828.k85IS8cF006522@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wavbreaker - Tool for splitting .wav files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175127 ------- Additional Comments From adrian at lisas.de 2006-09-05 14:28 EST ------- I was on holiday until yesterday. Dave, I will contact you directly and we can try to continue from here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 5 19:09:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 15:09:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204125] Review Request: tremulous-data - Data files for tremulous the FPS game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609051909.k85J9S0N013155@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tremulous-data - Data files for tremulous the FPS game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204125 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-09-05 15:09 EST ------- (In reply to comment #6) > - Spec file seems fine, three minor nitpicks : > - The Source1 "tremulous-copyright.txt" gets installed as > "fedora-copyright.txt", why two different names? The name starting with tremulous is to make clear to which package it belongs when the src rpm gets installed and the files dropped under /usr/src/redhat/SOURCES Since under /usr/share/doc it already is in a tremulous dir the trmulous in the name isn't needed and since the file is added to meet the fedora copyright guidelines I call it fedora-copyright.txt . > - Maybe you should uncomment the %build line, even though the section is > empty, since IIRC not having %build has already caused weird things to > happen. I actually commented it because in another review of a similar data only package the reviewer wanted it commented, so I'm leaving it as is as this seems to work fine for the other package. > - It's "basically", not "basicly". Fixed I'm importing it now (slow slow lookaside cache upload, at times like the the A in ADSL sucks). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 5 20:15:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 16:15:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204417] Review Request: telepathy-gabble - A Jabber/XMPP connection manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609052015.k85KFI70021243@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: telepathy-gabble - A Jabber/XMPP connection manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204417 ------- Additional Comments From sander at hoentjen.eu 2006-09-05 16:15 EST ------- Ok I asked in fedora extras list and it seems an extra package for dir ownership is the way to go. Do you want to create such a package, or do you have another suggestion? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 5 20:42:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 16:42:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204417] Review Request: telepathy-gabble - A Jabber/XMPP connection manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609052042.k85KgJDw024111@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: telepathy-gabble - A Jabber/XMPP connection manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204417 ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at ameritech.net 2006-09-05 16:42 EST ------- (In reply to comment #7) > Ok I asked in fedora extras list and it seems an extra package for dir ownership > is the way to go. Do you want to create such a package, or do you have another > suggestion? I'm a little skeptical if that is the right thing to do at the moment, considering no other managers have even been released so far. Maybe once one of the other managers have a proper release. Glancing thru the repo the only package I see that has a separate filesystem package is xorg-x11 currently. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 5 20:57:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 16:57:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203190] Review Request: netlabel_tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609052057.k85KvXP4026447@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: netlabel_tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203190 james.antill at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 5 21:26:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 17:26:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205300] New: Review Request: gtk-sharp - a set of mono bindings for gtk1.2 Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205300 Summary: Review Request: gtk-sharp - a set of mono bindings for gtk1.2 Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.knox.net.nz/~nodoid/gtk-sharp.spec SRPM URL: http://www.knox.net.nz/~nodoid/gtk-sharp-1.0.10-6.src.rpm Description: gtk-sharp is a set of mono bindings for gtk-1.2. It has been recently (today!) been removed from core to FE. This version includes patches for the correct installation for 64 bit architectures (FC6/rawhide) as well as -devel package for the main package and gtk-sharp-gapi (both FC5 and FC6) Note : so that this builds on both FC5 and FC6, I've had to use a hack of sorts which will vanish as soon as FC5 becomes sane with respects to architecture agnostisism. The hack creates a define which places everything in /usr/lib (FC5) or %{_libdir} (FC6). This means that it complies (in spirit at least!) with the packaging guidelines -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 5 21:32:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 17:32:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204164] Review Request: perl-LWP-Authen-Wsse - Library for enabling X-WSSE authentication in LWP In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609052132.k85LWEW2028351@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-LWP-Authen-Wsse - Library for enabling X-WSSE authentication in LWP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204164 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-09-05 17:32 EST ------- I have - Add BuildRequires perl(Digest::SHA1) perl(MIME::Base64) in the package I have just imported. Thanks for the review. I'll build it and close the bug when the buildsys becomes more responsive... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 5 21:59:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 17:59:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205300] Review Request: gtk-sharp - a set of mono bindings for gtk1.2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609052159.k85LxEE5031347@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtk-sharp - a set of mono bindings for gtk1.2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205300 andreas at bawue.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |andreas at bawue.net -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 5 22:07:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 18:07:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205304] New: Review Request: perl-Sub-Identify - Retrieve names of code references Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205304 Summary: Review Request: perl-Sub-Identify - Retrieve names of code references Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Sub-Identify/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com SRPM URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-Sub-Identify-0.02-1.fc5.src.rpm SPEC URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-Sub-Identify.spec Description: Sub::Identify allows you to retrieve the real name of code references. For this, it uses perl's introspection mechanism, provided by the B module. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 5 22:08:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 18:08:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205304] Review Request: perl-Sub-Identify - Retrieve names of code references In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609052208.k85M83T6031826@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Sub-Identify - Retrieve names of code references https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205304 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |163776 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 5 22:19:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 18:19:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205306] New: Review Request: perl-SUPER - Control superclass method dispatch Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205306 Summary: Review Request: perl-SUPER - Control superclass method dispatch Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/SUPER/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com SRPM URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-SUPER-1.14-1.fc5.src.rpm SPEC URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-SUPER.spec Description: When subclassing a class, you occasionally want to dispatch control to the superclass -- at least conditionally and temporarily. The Perl syntax for calling your superclass is ugly and unwieldy: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 5 22:19:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 18:19:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205306] Review Request: perl-SUPER - Control superclass method dispatch In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609052219.k85MJdZi032309@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-SUPER - Control superclass method dispatch https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205306 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |205304 OtherBugsDependingO| |163776 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 5 22:19:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 18:19:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205304] Review Request: perl-Sub-Identify - Retrieve names of code references In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609052219.k85MJpR1032335@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Sub-Identify - Retrieve names of code references https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205304 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |205306 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 5 22:24:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 18:24:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205309] New: Review Request: perl-Algorithm-C3 - Module for merging hierarchies using the C3 algorithm Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205309 Summary: Review Request: perl-Algorithm-C3 - Module for merging hierarchies using the C3 algorithm Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Algorithm-C3/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com SRPM URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-Algorithm-C3-0.05-1.fc5.src.rpm SPEC URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-Algorithm-C3.spec Description: This module implements the C3 algorithm. Most of the uses I have for C3 revolve around class building and metamodels, but it could also be used for things like dependency resolution as well since it tends to do such a nice job of preserving local precendence orderings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 5 22:24:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 18:24:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204601] Review Request: geda-examples - Circuit examples for gEDA In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609052224.k85MOfCQ032570@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: geda-examples - Circuit examples for gEDA https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204601 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2006-09-05 18:24 EST ------- Updated: Spec URL: http://chitlesh.funpic.de/rpm/geda-examples.spec SRPM URL: http://chitlesh.funpic.de/rpm/geda-examples-20060824-4.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 5 22:24:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 18:24:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205309] Review Request: perl-Algorithm-C3 - Module for merging hierarchies using the C3 algorithm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609052224.k85MOxfm032609@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Algorithm-C3 - Module for merging hierarchies using the C3 algorithm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205309 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |163776 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 5 23:28:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 19:28:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205314] New: Review Request: perl-Class-C3 - Pragma to use the C3 method resolution order algorithm Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205314 Summary: Review Request: perl-Class-C3 - Pragma to use the C3 method resolution order algorithm Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Class-C3/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com SRPM URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-Class-C3-0.13-1.fc5.src.rpm SPEC URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-Class-C3.spec Description: This is a pragma to change Perl 5's standard method resolution order from depth- first left-to-right (a.k.a - pre-order) to the more sophisticated C3 method resolution order. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 5 23:29:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 19:29:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205314] Review Request: perl-Class-C3 - Pragma to use the C3 method resolution order algorithm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609052329.k85NT5Gu002719@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Class-C3 - Pragma to use the C3 method resolution order algorithm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205314 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |205309 OtherBugsDependingO| |163776 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 5 23:29:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 19:29:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205309] Review Request: perl-Algorithm-C3 - Module for merging hierarchies using the C3 algorithm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609052329.k85NT5Ka002723@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Algorithm-C3 - Module for merging hierarchies using the C3 algorithm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205309 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |205314 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 5 23:39:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 19:39:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205318] New: Review Request: perl-Class-MOP - Class::MOP Perl module Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205318 Summary: Review Request: perl-Class-MOP - Class::MOP Perl module Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Class-MOP/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com SRPM URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-Class-MOP-0.34-1.fc5.src.rpm SPEC URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-Class-MOP.spec Description: This module is an attempt to create a meta object protocol for the Perl 5 object system. It makes no attempt to change the behavior or characteristics of the Perl 5 object system, only to create a protocol for its manipulation and introspection. That said, it does attempt to create the tools for building a rich set of extensions to the Perl 5 object system. Every attempt has been made for these tools to keep to the spirit of the Perl 5 object system that we all know and love. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 5 23:39:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 19:39:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205318] Review Request: perl-Class-MOP - Class::MOP Perl module In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609052339.k85NdYor003191@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Class-MOP - Class::MOP Perl module https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205318 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |205060, 205306, 205314 OtherBugsDependingO| |163776 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 5 23:39:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 19:39:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205306] Review Request: perl-SUPER - Control superclass method dispatch In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609052339.k85NdjBW003200@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-SUPER - Control superclass method dispatch https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205306 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |205318 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 5 23:39:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 19:39:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205314] Review Request: perl-Class-C3 - Pragma to use the C3 method resolution order algorithm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609052339.k85NdZii003195@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Class-C3 - Pragma to use the C3 method resolution order algorithm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205314 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |205318 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 5 23:39:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 19:39:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205060] Review Request: perl-Sub-Name - Name -- or rename -- a sub In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609052339.k85NdvwQ003225@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Sub-Name - Name -- or rename -- a sub https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205060 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |205318 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 6 00:02:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 20:02:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205319] New: Review Request: perl-Params-Coerce - Allows your classes to do coercion of parameters Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205319 Summary: Review Request: perl-Params-Coerce - Allows your classes to do coercion of parameters Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Params-Coerce/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com SRPM URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-Params-Coerce-0.13-1.fc5.src.rpm SPEC URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-Params-Coerce.spec Description: A big part of good API design is that we should be able to be flexible in the ways that we take parameters. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 6 00:02:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 20:02:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205319] Review Request: perl-Params-Coerce - Allows your classes to do coercion of parameters In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609060002.k8602PjI003809@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Params-Coerce - Allows your classes to do coercion of parameters https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205319 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |163776 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 6 00:08:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 20:08:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205321] New: Review Request: perl-Moose - Complete modern object system for Perl 5 Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205321 Summary: Review Request: perl-Moose - Complete modern object system for Perl 5 Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Moose/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com SRPM URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-Moose-0.12-1.fc5.src.rpm SPEC URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-Moose.spec Description: Moose is an extension of the Perl 5 object system. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 6 00:09:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 20:09:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205321] Review Request: perl-Moose - Complete modern object system for Perl 5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609060009.k86097fQ003980@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Moose - Complete modern object system for Perl 5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205321 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |205060, 205062, 205269, | |205318, 205319 OtherBugsDependingO| |163776 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 6 00:09:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 20:09:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205319] Review Request: perl-Params-Coerce - Allows your classes to do coercion of parameters In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609060009.k86097Io003984@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Params-Coerce - Allows your classes to do coercion of parameters https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205319 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |205321 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 6 00:09:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 20:09:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205269] Review Request: perl-Sub-Exporter - Sophisticated exporter for custom-built routines In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609060009.k8609JFC003992@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Sub-Exporter - Sophisticated exporter for custom-built routines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205269 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |205321 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 6 00:09:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 20:09:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205318] Review Request: perl-Class-MOP - Class::MOP Perl module In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609060009.k8609hXl004019@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Class-MOP - Class::MOP Perl module https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205318 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |205321 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 6 00:09:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 20:09:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205062] Review Request: perl-Sub-Install - Install subroutines into packages easily In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609060009.k8609hpZ004024@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Sub-Install - Install subroutines into packages easily https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205062 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |205321 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 6 00:09:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 20:09:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205060] Review Request: perl-Sub-Name - Name -- or rename -- a sub In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609060009.k8609ib1004028@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Sub-Name - Name -- or rename -- a sub https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205060 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |205321 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 6 02:07:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 22:07:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204601] Review Request: geda-examples - Circuit examples for gEDA In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609060207.k8627GkQ008888@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: geda-examples - Circuit examples for gEDA https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204601 sdb at cloud9.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |sdb at cloud9.net ------- Additional Comments From sdb at cloud9.net 2006-09-05 22:06 EST ------- Well, another question: This package seems to have some empty directories: /usr/share/gEDA/examples/RF_Amp/model /usr/share/gEDA/examples/RF_Amp/sym /usr/share/gEDA/examples/TwoStageAmp/sym /usr/share/gEDA/examples/lightning_detector/sym What are these directories for? Hmmm . . . . . These directories are *non-empty* on the gEDA on-line CVS: http://cvs.seul.org/viewcvs/viewcvs.cgi/eda/geda/gaf/examples/RF_Amp/model http://cvs.seul.org/viewcvs/viewcvs.cgi/eda/geda/gaf/examples/RF_Amp/sym etc . . . Is there a problem with the gEDA distrobution you got? Or are gEDA's build tools not fully up-to- date> Or perhaps an issue with the way Fedora archives and creates these files? I can look at my latest devel tree which I updated from CVS this morning. . . . please stand by until tomorrow when I am again at my computer. Stuart -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 6 02:32:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 22:32:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204601] Review Request: geda-examples - Circuit examples for gEDA In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609060232.k862Wc75010446@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: geda-examples - Circuit examples for gEDA https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204601 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-09-05 22:32 EST ------- (In reply to comment #12) > Hmmm . . . . . These directories are *non-empty* on the gEDA on-line CVS: > > http://cvs.seul.org/viewcvs/viewcvs.cgi/eda/geda/gaf/examples/RF_Amp/model > http://cvs.seul.org/viewcvs/viewcvs.cgi/eda/geda/gaf/examples/RF_Amp/sym > > etc . . . > The directories which were empty in -3 seems to be not empty in -4 rpm. Perhaps it was packaging problem. I will check -4 rpm later. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 6 03:19:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 23:19:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199254] Review Request: perl-perlmenu In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609060319.k863J80g014273@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-perlmenu https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199254 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 6 03:19:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 23:19:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199108] Review Request: gutenprint: Printer Drivers Package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609060319.k863JUZ4014313@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gutenprint: Printer Drivers Package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199108 Bug 199108 depends on bug 199254, which changed state. Bug 199254 Summary: Review Request: perl-perlmenu https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199254 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 6 04:34:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 00:34:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196824] Review Request: php-pear-Mail-Mime In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609060434.k864YaRk018719@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Mail-Mime Alias: php-pear-Mail-Mime https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196824 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at theholbrooks.org 2006-09-06 00:34 EST ------- Spec URL: http://theholbrooks.org/RPMS/php-pear-Mail-Mime.spec SRPM URL: http://theholbrooks.org/RPMS/php-pear-Mail-Mime-1.3.1-7.src.rpm Mail_Mime has been redone to comply with the template provided, with a few exceptions (mostly to raise questions to you fine folks and elicit feedback). Mail_Mime doesn't come with _any_ documentation, so I've kept the PHP license file from my last revision as SOURCE1 and install it where appropriate (licence files are good, though perhaps unneeded with pear packages? and rpmlint whines when you don't have any docs) Also, I've kept the (mostly pointless) %check section around because it's not hurting anything and _some_ check seems better than nothing... shall I delete it for uniformity's sake? I also kept 'install' quoted to appease rpmlint. Lastly, I read in the discussion that we needed to BR: php-pear >= 1:1.4.9-1.2, but the 1.2 doesn't appear in the template file. Is that an oversight? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 6 04:40:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 00:40:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197740] Review Request: dircproxy - IRC proxy server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609060440.k864eD1W018943@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dircproxy - IRC proxy server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197740 jwilson at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(jwilson at redhat.com| |) | ------- Additional Comments From jwilson at redhat.com 2006-09-06 00:40 EST ------- (In reply to comment #7) > Whew! ok :) I know that feeling... Been a bit overloaded with other stuff, finally getting back to this... > 1. It appears to me that this proxy can be run as a non-root user and still be > able to do everything needed except use the "switch_user" command. (Read > another way, it looks like you only need to run dircproxy as root if you want > to use "switch_user".) Let's find a way to have this service start up as a > non-root user by default (perhaps just "nobody" as README.identd suggests). Won't work as nobody: # su nobody -c "/usr/bin/dircproxy -f /etc/dircproxyrc" This account is currently not available. I'll have to add an account w/a valid login shell, but that's easy enough. > It would seem to make sense to patch /etc/init.d/dircproxy to read values from > /etc/sysconf/dircproxy (as other init scripts do) to determine what user to > run under, etc. Will do. > 2. The release tag here, as this is a beta package, should be something like: > > 0.x.beta%{?dist} Fixed locally. > 3. rpmlint emits two warnings -- both of these are easy enough to fix. [...] > [build at zeus dircproxy]$ rpmlint dircproxy-1.2.0-0.beta.1.fc5.src.rpm > W: dircproxy mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs > [build at zeus x86_64]$ rpmlint dircproxy-1.2.0-0.beta.1.fc5.x86_64.rpm > W: dircproxy wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding Both fixed locally. Just need to fix up the bits to run as non-root, which I'll have to save for tomorrow... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 6 04:51:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 00:51:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204975] Review Request: vigra - Generic Programming for Computer Vision In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609060451.k864pGcC019358@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vigra - Generic Programming for Computer Vision https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204975 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-09-06 00:51 EST ------- Now packaging looks ok No let the documentation be in -devel package only -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 6 04:55:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 00:55:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196824] Review Request: php-pear-Mail-Mime In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609060455.k864tQYD019621@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Mail-Mime Alias: php-pear-Mail-Mime https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196824 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2006-09-06 00:55 EST ------- Installing the license file is still okay and encouraged. The template does not include it because it cannot make assumptions on what the license is. Keeping the %check section is fine and doesn't need to be removed. Please remove the quotes from install. rpmlint is going to be fixed, infact it is already fixed, it just needs to be released to the public. The new BR was added to the cvs. Everything else looks good. Approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 6 04:56:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 00:56:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197740] Review Request: dircproxy - IRC proxy server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609060456.k864uuQE019677@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dircproxy - IRC proxy server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197740 ------- Additional Comments From jwilson at redhat.com 2006-09-06 00:56 EST ------- (In reply to comment #9) [...] > Just need to fix up the bits to run as non-root, which I'll have to save for tomorrow... I lied. Can't sleep at night if I leave things unfinished. :) http://wilsonet.com/packages/dircproxy/dircproxy-1.2.0-0.3.beta.fc6.src.rpm http://wilsonet.com/packages/dircproxy/dircproxy.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 6 04:57:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 00:57:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196824] Review Request: php-pear-Mail-Mime In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609060457.k864vuJl019704@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Mail-Mime Alias: php-pear-Mail-Mime https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196824 ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2006-09-06 00:57 EST ------- One final note, you may want to remove the "PEAR:" from the Summary. The package name already indicates it is a pear package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 6 05:22:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 01:22:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205075] Review Request: fwbackups - a user backup program, with support for automated backups and on-demand backups In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609060522.k865MG8j020316@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fwbackups - a user backup program, with support for automated backups and on-demand backups https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205075 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |panemade at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-09-06 01:22 EST ------- rpmlint on binary rpm is not silent W: fwbackups summary-not-capitalized fwbackups is a user backup program Summary doesn't begin with a capital letter. W: fwbackups symlink-should-be-relative /usr/bin/fwbackups /usr/bin/consolehelper Absolute symlinks are problematic eg. when working with chroot environments. W: fwbackups symlink-should-be-relative /usr/bin/fwbackups-run /usr/bin/consolehelper Absolute symlinks are problematic eg. when working with chroot environments. E: fwbackups use-old-pam-stack /etc/pam.d/fwbackups Update pam file to use include instead of pam_stack. E: fwbackups use-old-pam-stack /etc/pam.d/fwbackups-run Update pam file to use include instead of pam_stack. update changes as suggested above -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 6 05:56:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 01:56:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204417] Review Request: telepathy-gabble - A Jabber/XMPP connection manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609060556.k865u5tE023137@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: telepathy-gabble - A Jabber/XMPP connection manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204417 ------- Additional Comments From sander at hoentjen.eu 2006-09-06 01:55 EST ------- Well there will be other managers in the future so why not deal with it right now? Sure we can wait until the next connection manager is released, but we will have to find a solution. If you have a solution other then i suggested please let me know. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 6 06:13:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 02:13:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204601] Review Request: geda-examples - Circuit examples for gEDA In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609060613.k866DHkE023790@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: geda-examples - Circuit examples for gEDA https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204601 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-09-06 02:13 EST ------- Okay. This package (geda-examples) is now ACCEPTED by me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 6 06:35:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 02:35:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204121] Review Request: tremulous - First Person Shooter game based on the Quake 3 engine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609060635.k866ZcUp024699@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tremulous - First Person Shooter game based on the Quake 3 engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204121 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-09-06 02:35 EST ------- Thanks! Imported and build, closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 6 06:35:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 02:35:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204125] Review Request: tremulous-data - Data files for tremulous the FPS game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609060635.k866Zurv024751@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tremulous-data - Data files for tremulous the FPS game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204125 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-09-06 02:35 EST ------- Thanks BTW! Imported and Build, Closing -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 6 06:48:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 02:48:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205060] Review Request: perl-Sub-Name - Name -- or rename -- a sub In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609060648.k866mpXw025165@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Sub-Name - Name -- or rename -- a sub https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205060 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |pertusus at free.fr -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 6 06:55:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 02:55:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203520] Review Request: evolution-brutus In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609060655.k866tiGU025478@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: evolution-brutus Alias: evolution-brutus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203520 ------- Additional Comments From colding at omesc.com 2006-09-06 02:55 EST ------- (In reply to comment #11) > (In reply to comment #10) > > Well, Fedora Core devel still has e-d-s 1.7, but since 1.8 is out I suspect it > > will be packaged soon. > > Actually, rawhide today has evolution-data-server-1.8.0-1.fc6 . > So at least this package should have the support for evolution-data-server-1.8, > otherwise this package cannot be accepted, I suppose. > > Also, libglade2-devel evolution e2fsprogs-devel is missing for BuildRequires > (checked by mock) OK, I'll add those. > Note: even after I install the missing BR packages above and make some > "version trick" on configure, I still cannot rebuild this package against > evolution-data-server-devel-1.8.0-1.fc6 with following error: That is actually expected. I've only build against the sub-1.7 e-d-s packages so some API changes for e-d-s 1.7/8 are to be expected. I;ve just finished installing fc6 test 2 so I expect to fix any issues during today. Thanks, jules -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 6 06:59:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 02:59:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203520] Review Request: evolution-brutus In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609060659.k866xU3e025645@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: evolution-brutus Alias: evolution-brutus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203520 ------- Additional Comments From colding at omesc.com 2006-09-06 02:59 EST ------- (In reply to comment #11) > (In reply to comment #10) > > Well, Fedora Core devel still has e-d-s 1.7, but since 1.8 is out I suspect it > > will be packaged soon. > > Actually, rawhide today has evolution-data-server-1.8.0-1.fc6 . > So at least this package should have the support for evolution-data-server-1.8, > otherwise this package cannot be accepted, I suppose. > > Also, libglade2-devel evolution e2fsprogs-devel is missing for BuildRequires > (checked by mock) Hmm... strange. Evolution should not be required by evolution-brutus, only e-d-s and related packages. -- jules -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 6 07:33:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 03:33:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205343] New: Review Request: cohoba - Cohoba is a GNOME interface for Telepathy. It aims to be innovative and simple Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205343 Summary: Review Request: cohoba - Cohoba is a GNOME interface for Telepathy. It aims to be innovative and simple Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: sander at hoentjen.eu QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://fedora.hoentjen.eu/telepathy/cohoba.spec SRPM URL: http://fedora.hoentjen.eu/telepathy/cohoba-0.0.3-1.src.rpm Description: Gnome's interfaces for telepathy backend. The aim of this project is to provide a D-Bus-based framework that unifies all forms of real time conversations, including, but not limited to, instant messaging, IRC and voice and video over IP. It aims to provide a simple interface to client applications allowing them to quickly implement code to make use of real time communication over any supported protocol. Cohoba is one of the gnome's interfaces for telepathy backend. It aims to be innovative and simple to use. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 6 07:48:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 03:48:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203520] Review Request: evolution-brutus In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609060748.k867mCkp028753@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: evolution-brutus Alias: evolution-brutus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203520 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-09-06 03:48 EST ------- (In reply to comment #13) > > Also, libglade2-devel evolution e2fsprogs-devel is missing for BuildRequires > > (checked by mock) > > Hmm... strange. Evolution should not be required by evolution-brutus, only e-d-s > and related packages. As in the comment #8, configure complains: /configure: line 2122: evolution: command not found configure includes the line: EVOLUTION_VERSION=`evolution --version | cut -b 17,18,19 2>/dev/null` and this requires evolution. Note: configure also includes: cat >>confdefs.h <<_ACEOF #define EVO_PATHNAME "/usr/bin/evolution-$EVOLUTION_VERSION" _ACEOF however, with evolution-2.7.92-7.fc6, EVOLUTION_VERSION is 2.7 while there exists /usr/bin/evolution-2.8 (not /usr/bin/evolution-2.7), so anyway this is wrong. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 6 07:51:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 03:51:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203520] Review Request: evolution-brutus In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609060751.k867pt9l029048@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: evolution-brutus Alias: evolution-brutus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203520 ------- Additional Comments From colding at omesc.com 2006-09-06 03:51 EST ------- (In reply to comment #14) > (In reply to comment #13) > > > Also, libglade2-devel evolution e2fsprogs-devel is missing for BuildRequires > > > (checked by mock) > > > > Hmm... strange. Evolution should not be required by evolution-brutus, only e-d-s > > and related packages. > As in the comment #8, configure complains: > > /configure: line 2122: evolution: command not found > > configure includes the line: > EVOLUTION_VERSION=`evolution --version | cut -b 17,18,19 2>/dev/null` > and this requires evolution. > > Note: configure also includes: > > cat >>confdefs.h <<_ACEOF > #define EVO_PATHNAME "/usr/bin/evolution-$EVOLUTION_VERSION" > _ACEOF > > however, with evolution-2.7.92-7.fc6, EVOLUTION_VERSION is 2.7 while > there exists /usr/bin/evolution-2.8 (not /usr/bin/evolution-2.7), so anyway > this is wrong. OK, yes I see. Thanks, jules -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 6 08:25:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 04:25:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205060] Review Request: perl-Sub-Name - Name -- or rename -- a sub In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609060825.k868PFdD031909@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Sub-Name - Name -- or rename -- a sub https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205060 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-09-06 04:24 EST ------- * rpmlint is silent * package named according to guidelines * free software, without licence files included * meets packaging guidelines * spec legible * source match upstream a47e1f1fe88a0c85b7ecc0d150039616 Sub-Name-0.02.tar.gz * sane provides (providing Name.so is certainly wrong, but should be handled automatically by provide script) Provides: Name.so perl(Sub::Name) = 0.02 * %files right APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 6 08:26:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 04:26:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205060] Review Request: perl-Sub-Name - Name -- or rename -- a sub In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609060826.k868QIPr031985@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Sub-Name - Name -- or rename -- a sub https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205060 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163779 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 6 08:28:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 04:28:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205060] Review Request: perl-Sub-Name - Name -- or rename -- a sub In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609060828.k868Sj41032197@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Sub-Name - Name -- or rename -- a sub https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205060 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-09-06 04:28 EST ------- As a side note, it is possible that the -- in the summmary aren't rendered nicely in all the softs using the summary, maybe they could be replaced with some ,. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 6 09:41:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 05:41:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204601] Review Request: geda-examples - Circuit examples for gEDA In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609060941.k869fSIi004812@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: geda-examples - Circuit examples for gEDA https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204601 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2006-09-06 05:41 EST ------- (In reply to comment #13) > The directories which were empty in -3 seems to be not empty > in -4 rpm. Perhaps it was packaging problem. > > I will check -4 rpm later. It was indeed a packaging problem which occurs when I changed from 20060123 to snapshot 20060824 :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 6 09:46:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 05:46:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205043] Review Request: geda-gattrib - Attribute editor for gEDA In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609060946.k869kf5x005358@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: geda-gattrib - Attribute editor for gEDA https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205043 cgoorah at yahoo.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 6 09:46:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 05:46:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205150] Review Request: geda-docs - Documentation for gEDA In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609060946.k869kqV3005400@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: geda-docs - Documentation for gEDA https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205150 cgoorah at yahoo.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 6 09:56:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 05:56:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197814] Review Request: autogen In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609060956.k869udAe006326@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: autogen https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197814 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-09-06 05:56 EST ------- (In reply to comment #25) > I ripped the recipe directly from the sendmail spec, so if I'm wrong, so it is! Whilst this is a matter of preference, the sendmail package uses the package name as a suffix rather than a prefix, so citing sendmail as your reference here is wrong: $ rpm -ql sendmail | grep sendmail /etc/mail/sendmail.cf /etc/mail/sendmail.mc /etc/pam.d/smtp.sendmail /etc/rc.d/init.d/sendmail /etc/sysconfig/sendmail /usr/bin/mailq.sendmail /usr/bin/newaliases.sendmail /usr/bin/rmail.sendmail /usr/lib/sendmail.sendmail /usr/sbin/sendmail.sendmail /usr/share/man/man1/mailq.sendmail.1.gz /usr/share/man/man1/newaliases.sendmail.1.gz /usr/share/man/man5/aliases.sendmail.5.gz /usr/share/man/man8/sendmail.sendmail.8.gz -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 6 09:59:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 05:59:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205304] Review Request: perl-Sub-Identify - Retrieve names of code references In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609060959.k869x9AW006457@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Sub-Identify - Retrieve names of code references https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205304 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |pertusus at free.fr OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-09-06 05:59 EST ------- * rpmlint is silent * package named according to guidelines * free software, without licence files included * meets packaging guidelines * spec legible * source match upstream 5efae626e447e064f804e712e5fb03f2 Sub-Identify-0.02.tar.gz * sane provides Provides: perl(Sub::Identify) = 0.02 * %files right APPROVED You could add BuildRequires perl(B) (and maybe Tests::More) but since it is in perl core, it is not really important. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 6 10:02:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 06:02:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204164] Review Request: perl-LWP-Authen-Wsse - Library for enabling X-WSSE authentication in LWP In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609061002.k86A2QoY006701@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-LWP-Authen-Wsse - Library for enabling X-WSSE authentication in LWP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204164 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 6 10:06:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 06:06:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199108] Review Request: gutenprint: Printer Drivers Package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609061006.k86A6MS8007088@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gutenprint: Printer Drivers Package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199108 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-09-06 06:06 EST ------- May I see official Review of this now as i feel its now in better consition to be included in FE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 6 10:21:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 06:21:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193894] Review Request: ant-contrib - A collection of tasks for Ant In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609061021.k86ALexq008168@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ant-contrib - A collection of tasks for Ant https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193894 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-09-06 06:21 EST ------- (In reply to comment #17) > It seems like this is a problem with my system. Every source RPM I try to build > does not get a -debuginfo package. Installing the redhat-rpm-config package should fix that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 6 10:56:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 06:56:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204151] Review Request: perl-File-NFSLock - Perl module to do NFS (or not) locking In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609061056.k86Au9Mm009934@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-File-NFSLock - Perl module to do NFS (or not) locking https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204151 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request:perl-File- |Review Request: perl-File- |NFSLock - Perl module to do|NFSLock - Perl module to do |NFS (or not) locking |NFS (or not) locking -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 6 11:00:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 07:00:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201873] Review Request: wmix - Dockapp mixer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609061100.k86B0vjF010246@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wmix - Dockapp mixer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201873 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 6 11:25:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 07:25:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205360] New: Review Request: gnucap - GNU Circuit Analysis Package Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205360 Summary: Review Request: gnucap - GNU Circuit Analysis Package Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cgoorah at yahoo.com.au QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://chitlesh.funpic.de/rpm/gnucap.spec SRPM URL: http://chitlesh.funpic.de/rpm/gnucap-20060830-1.src.rpm Description: GnuCap is a general purpose circuit simulator. It performs nonlinear DC and transient analyses, Fourier analysis, and AC analysis. It is fully interactive and command-driven. It can also be run in batch mode or as a server. GnuCap is not based on Spice, but some of the models have been derived from the Berkeley models. Unlike Spice, the engine is designed to do true mixed-mode simulation. Spice-compatible models for the MOSFET (level 1-7) and diode are included in this release. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 6 11:29:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 07:29:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205360] Review Request: gnucap - GNU Circuit Analysis Package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609061129.k86BT9Rb011642@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnucap - GNU Circuit Analysis Package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205360 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-09-06 07:29 EST ------- Erm, gnucap is already in FE (maintained by me). Close please -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 6 11:40:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 07:40:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197814] Review Request: autogen In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609061140.k86Beg1R012195@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: autogen https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197814 ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2006-09-06 07:40 EST ------- Ah, I knew I wasn't imagining things. ;) PFJ, please follow the $file.$alternative-package convention. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 6 12:34:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 08:34:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205023] Review Request: filelight-1.0 - cool diskspace use browser for kde In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609061234.k86CYmeq014733@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: filelight-1.0 - cool diskspace use browser for kde https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205023 ------- Additional Comments From ndbecker2 at verizon.net 2006-09-06 08:34 EST ------- (In reply to comment #10) > OTOH, the original rationale for adding --vendor=fedora is when there isn't an > upstream .desktop file, but that's not true in this case. I'd recommend instead > using something (simpler) like this instead: > desktop-file-install \ > --dir ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}%{_datadir}/applications/kde \ > --add-category="X-Fedora" --vendor="" \ > ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}%{_datadir}/applications/kde/filelight.desktop I'm ready to submit the package, but I'm waiting to hear a resolution on this question. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 6 12:45:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 08:45:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205360] Review Request: gnucap - GNU Circuit Analysis Package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609061245.k86Cj7wi015212@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnucap - GNU Circuit Analysis Package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205360 cgoorah at yahoo.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 6 12:45:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 08:45:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205023] Review Request: filelight-1.0 - cool diskspace use browser for kde In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609061245.k86CjfOD015285@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: filelight-1.0 - cool diskspace use browser for kde https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205023 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |rdieter at math.unl.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-09-06 08:45 EST ------- OK, I'll be official reviewer. Consider my suggestion a resolution. (: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 6 13:02:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 09:02:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205023] Review Request: filelight-1.0 - cool diskspace use browser for kde In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609061302.k86D2Xdd016837@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: filelight-1.0 - cool diskspace use browser for kde https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205023 ------- Additional Comments From ndbecker2 at verizon.net 2006-09-06 09:02 EST ------- OK. Please see http://nbecker.dyndns.org:8080/RPM/filelight.spec http://nbecker.dyndns.org:8080/RPM/filelight-1.0-5.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 6 13:05:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 09:05:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 195666] Review Request: mod_fcgid In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609061305.k86D5VY3017092@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mod_fcgid https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195666 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-09-06 09:05 EST ------- Given that this package was approved (Comment #6) earlier, I shall now import and build it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 6 13:07:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 09:07:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205023] Review Request: filelight-1.0 - cool diskspace use browser for kde In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609061307.k86D7q6r017276@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: filelight-1.0 - cool diskspace use browser for kde https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205023 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-09-06 09:07 EST ------- I think you meant: %config %{_datadir}/config/filelightrc %{_datadir}/applications/kde/filelight.desktop not %{_datadir}/config/filelightrc %config %{_datadir}/applications/kde/filelight.desktop right? (: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 6 13:18:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 09:18:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205023] Review Request: filelight-1.0 - cool diskspace use browser for kde In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609061318.k86DIV9P018722@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: filelight-1.0 - cool diskspace use browser for kde https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205023 ------- Additional Comments From ndbecker2 at verizon.net 2006-09-06 09:18 EST ------- Yes, thanks. http://nbecker.dyndns.og:8080/RPM/filelight.spec http://nbecker.dyndns.org:8080/RPM/filelight-1.0-6.src.rpmr -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 6 13:18:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 09:18:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202006] Review Request: fmio - FM radio card manipulation utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609061318.k86DIURU018712@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fmio - FM radio card manipulation utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202006 ------- Additional Comments From andy at smile.org.ua 2006-09-06 09:18 EST ------- 2. Permissions are OK [andy at andriy ~]$ rpm -qlvp /home/andy/RPM/RPMS/i386/fmio-2.0.8-7.i386.rpm | grep so$ -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 173559 ??? 6 16:21 /usr/lib/libradio.so But warning is present. I've investigate this and found rpm isn't called the any strip wrapper on the library. I haven't any ideas about this. My guess this is not an error and not showstopper warning. Updated file here: ftp://andriy.asplinux.com.ua/pub/people/andy/extras/fmio-2.0.8-7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 6 13:43:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 09:43:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203520] Review Request: evolution-brutus In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609061343.k86Dhorg021015@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: evolution-brutus Alias: evolution-brutus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203520 ------- Additional Comments From colding at omesc.com 2006-09-06 09:43 EST ------- OK, I finally managed to build FC6 test 2 rpms. They should address all outstanding issues and can be downloaded here: Spec URL: http://www.omesc.com/content/downloads/dist/Fedora%20Core%206/SPECS/evolution-brutus.spec SRPM URL: http://www.omesc.com/content/downloads/dist/Fedora%20Core%206/SRPMS/evolution-brutus-1.1.6-4.src.rpm The FC6 test 2 build box has all yum updates if it matters... Best regards, jules -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 6 13:45:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 09:45:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196824] Review Request: php-pear-Mail-Mime In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609061345.k86DjLL1021167@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Mail-Mime Alias: php-pear-Mail-Mime https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196824 fedora at theholbrooks.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From fedora at theholbrooks.org 2006-09-06 09:45 EST ------- Removed the quotes from install and added the strict-er BR: I also removed PEAR: from the summary, though it appears that many (if not all) existing PEAR modules use this prefix in their summary, maybe we should standardize? Imported and successfully built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 6 13:45:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 09:45:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189195] Review Request: horde - php application framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609061345.k86DjWNi021192@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: horde - php application framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189195 Bug 189195 depends on bug 196824, which changed state. Bug 196824 Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Mail-Mime https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196824 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 6 13:45:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 09:45:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203520] Review Request: evolution-brutus In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609061345.k86DjrGb021259@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: evolution-brutus Alias: evolution-brutus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203520 ------- Additional Comments From colding at omesc.com 2006-09-06 09:45 EST ------- OK, I made a typo in the URL. Correct URLs here: Spec URL: http://www.omesc.com/content/downloads/dist/Fedora%20Core%206/SPECS/evolution-brutus.spec SRPM URL: http://www.omesc.com/content/downloads/dist/Fedora%20Core%206/SRPMS/evolution-brutus-1.1.6-5.src.rpm Sorry, jules -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 6 14:25:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 10:25:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 195666] Review Request: mod_fcgid In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609061425.k86EPYgt024016@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mod_fcgid https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195666 paul at city-fan.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-09-06 10:25 EST ------- 16330 (mod_fcgid): Build on target fedora-development-extras succeeded. Build logs may be found at http://buildsys.fedoraproject.org/logs/fedora-development-extras/16330-mod_fcgid-1.10-7.fc6/ owners.list updated, FE6 comps entry added, FE-5 branch request made -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 6 14:46:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 10:46:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204954] Review Request: libofa - Open Fingerprint Architecture library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609061446.k86EkBLk025445@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libofa - Open Fingerprint Architecture library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204954 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-09-06 10:46 EST ------- Crud, I had only previously tested this on rhel4. Must be a gcc4 thing. I'll report it upstream. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 6 14:52:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 10:52:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205304] Review Request: perl-Sub-Identify - Retrieve names of code references In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609061452.k86Eq3si025942@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Sub-Identify - Retrieve names of code references https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205304 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-09-06 10:51 EST ------- +Import to CVS +Add to owners.list +Bump release, build for devel +devel build succeeds +Request branching (FC-5) +Close bug Thanks for the review! :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 6 14:52:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 10:52:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205306] Review Request: perl-SUPER - Control superclass method dispatch In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609061452.k86EqGla025960@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-SUPER - Control superclass method dispatch https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205306 Bug 205306 depends on bug 205304, which changed state. Bug 205304 Summary: Review Request: perl-Sub-Identify - Retrieve names of code references https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205304 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 6 14:57:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 10:57:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205060] Review Request: perl-Sub-Name - Name -- or rename -- a sub In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609061457.k86Evs7G026456@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Sub-Name - Name -- or rename -- a sub https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205060 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-09-06 10:57 EST ------- +Import to CVS +Add to owners.list +Bump release, build for devel +devel build succeeds +Request branching (FC-5) +Close bug Thanks for the review! :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 6 14:57:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 10:57:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205321] Review Request: perl-Moose - Complete modern object system for Perl 5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609061457.k86EvtA2026460@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Moose - Complete modern object system for Perl 5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205321 Bug 205321 depends on bug 205060, which changed state. Bug 205060 Summary: Review Request: perl-Sub-Name - Name -- or rename -- a sub https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205060 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 6 14:58:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 10:58:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205318] Review Request: perl-Class-MOP - Class::MOP Perl module In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609061458.k86EwIZ7026500@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Class-MOP - Class::MOP Perl module https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205318 Bug 205318 depends on bug 205060, which changed state. Bug 205060 Summary: Review Request: perl-Sub-Name - Name -- or rename -- a sub https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205060 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 6 15:12:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 11:12:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203520] Review Request: evolution-brutus In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609061512.k86FC6NL027510@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: evolution-brutus Alias: evolution-brutus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203520 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-09-06 11:12 EST ------- Just a quick check of 1.1.6-5. * Well, this package does not aimed for FC5 at all? This package can be rebuilt in mock under 20060906 rawhide, however this package cannot be rebuilt under FC5 (with 20060906 updates) with following error: No Package Found for evolution-data-server-devel >= 1.8 No Package Found for ORBit2-devel >= 2.14.1 0:evolution-2.6.3-1.fc5.5.i386 0:gnome-common-2.12.0-2.fc5.noarch 0:e2fsprogs-devel-1.38-12.i386 0:gettext-0.14.5-3.i386 0:libglade2-devel-2.5.1-4.fc5.1.i386 0:intltool-0.34.2-1.1.i386 0:gnome-keyring-devel-0.4.9-1.i386 Cannot find build req evolution-data-server-devel >= 1.8. Exiting. ending even if I remove version-release related requirement issue, still I cannot rebuild this under FC5 with following error: Requested 'ORBit-2.0 >= 2.14.1' but version of ORBit-2.0 is 2.14.0 Consider adjusting the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable if you installed software in a non-standard prefix. Alternatively, you may set the environment variables GNOME_FULL_CFLAGS and GNOME_FULL_LIBS to avoid the need to call pkg-config. See the pkg-config man page for more details. error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.57376 (%build) * rpmlint for FC6-devel-built rpms complaints: W: evolution-brutus macro-in-%changelog makeinstall * Why does this package use Autoreq: no ? This description forbids finding libraries requirements, which I think is quite unwilling. Even if you want to specify version-related requirements, "Autoreq: no" is unnecessary because you can simply add the requirements in addition to auto-finding requirements. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 6 15:38:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 11:38:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199108] Review Request: gutenprint: Printer Drivers Package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609061538.k86FcYCE029757@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gutenprint: Printer Drivers Package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199108 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kevin at tummy.com ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-09-06 11:38 EST ------- I'll try and do a full review on this later today unless someone else wants to jump in first. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 6 16:15:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 12:15:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204601] Review Request: geda-examples - Circuit examples for gEDA In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609061615.k86GFdFa000554@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: geda-examples - Circuit examples for gEDA https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204601 cgoorah at yahoo.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 6 16:21:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 12:21:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205151] Review Request: geda-utils - Several utilities for the gEDA project In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609061621.k86GL8ZQ001013@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: geda-utils - Several utilities for the gEDA project https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205151 cgoorah at yahoo.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 6 16:30:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 12:30:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201779] Review Request: xfsdump In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609061630.k86GUC1U002014@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xfsdump https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201779 cattelan at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |npearl at sgi.com ------- Additional Comments From cattelan at redhat.com 2006-09-06 12:30 EST ------- *** Bug 116016 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 6 16:34:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 12:34:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201779] Review Request: xfsdump In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609061634.k86GYMeR002641@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xfsdump https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201779 ------- Additional Comments From cattelan at redhat.com 2006-09-06 12:34 EST ------- The src rpm has been checked into the fedora cvs repository and the build has passed the build test. So at this point I think the xfsdump package should be ready to go. I'm not clear if there is anything else that needs to be done before it it built and distributed as part of "extras" -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 6 16:40:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 12:40:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201779] Review Request: xfsdump In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609061640.k86GejSr003194@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xfsdump https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201779 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-09-06 12:40 EST ------- You built on the development branch, so your package will automatically be available to rawhide users at the next package push and will be in FE6 when it branches. If you want to make a release for FC5, request an FC5 branch at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/CVSSyncNeeded Once that gets done, you can tag and build for FC5. At this point, though, you can close this bug unless you want to wait until the FC5 branch is complete. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 6 16:53:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 12:53:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205138] Review Request: libjingle - GoogleTalk implementation of Jingle In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609061653.k86GrOuk004163@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libjingle - GoogleTalk implementation of Jingle https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205138 ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at ameritech.net 2006-09-06 12:53 EST ------- Is this going to get a review? If not, this should remain FE-NEW so others can pick it up if they wish. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 6 17:00:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 13:00:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196749] Review Request: php-pecl-xdebug - PECL package for debugging PHP scripts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609061700.k86H0nQc004709@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pecl-xdebug - PECL package for debugging PHP scripts Alias: php-pecl-xdebug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196749 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-09-06 13:00 EST ------- Unfortunately I've found one blocker and a couple more minor issues while running through my checklist. Your Release: violates the naming guidelines. The full NEVR should be: php-pecl-xdebug-2.0.0-0.1.beta6 Then you can increment the "1" for each package update until the actual 2.0.0 release comes out, at which time you can use 2.0.0-1. See "Pre-Release packages" in http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines Also, we removed the requirement for Provides: php-xdebug from the guideline draft, so you should be able to remove it unless you have some reason to keep it in. The debuginfo package don't seem to contain the source. I'm not really sure why; debuginfo generation remains a mystery to most. It does seem to contain plenty of debug symbols, though, and this isn't a blocker in any case. * source files match upstream: 1ba82711d8f91c38c4b30a396cc2e72a xdebug-2.0.0beta6.tgz X package meets naming and packaging guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * dist tag is present. * build root is correct. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. License text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * compiler flags are appropriate. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). ? debuginfo package looks complete. * rpmlint is silent. ? final provides and requires are sane: config(php-pecl-xdebug) = 2.0.0-beta6.2.fc6 php-pecl(Xdebug) = 2.0.0-beta6.2.fc6 ? php-xdebug = 2.0.0-beta6.2.fc6 xdebug.so()(64bit) php-pecl-xdebug = 2.0.0-beta6.2.fc6 = config(php-pecl-xdebug) = 2.0.0-beta6.2.fc6 php-api = 20041225 * %check is not present; no test suite upstream. * no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. * package is not relocatable. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no libtool .la droppings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 6 17:02:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 13:02:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205138] Review Request: libjingle - GoogleTalk implementation of Jingle In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609061702.k86H2X8V004841@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libjingle - GoogleTalk implementation of Jingle https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205138 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-09-06 13:02 EST ------- Had machine problems last night - I'll review it later today -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 6 17:25:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 13:25:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201656] Review Request: gstm-1.2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609061725.k86HPukM006559@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gstm-1.2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201656 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-09-06 13:25 EST ------- Indeed, those two issues have been fixed. Three rpmlint issues have cropped up, but they're not blockers: W: gstm macro-in-%changelog description You need to double every percent symbol in your changelog. W: gstm mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs I believe this warning is completely bogus in this situation. W: gaskpass no-documentation Indeed, there isn't any, but this isn't really an issue as far as I can see. The issues that were raised have been addressed. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 6 17:36:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 13:36:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204493] Review Request: perl-Mozilla-DOM - Perl interface to Mozilla DOM In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609061736.k86HaddY007215@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Mozilla-DOM - Perl interface to Mozilla DOM https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204493 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-09-06 13:36 EST ------- Hmmm, mozilla-devel doesn't exist in FC6, so this package can't be built. It seems a bit pointless to just target FC5 at this point. What's the plan here? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 6 17:45:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 13:45:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205127] Review Request: ekg - A client compatible with Gadu-Gadu In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609061745.k86Hjk7P007884@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ekg - A client compatible with Gadu-Gadu https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205127 ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2006-09-06 13:45 EST ------- http://rpm.greysector.net/extras/ekg.spec http://rpm.greysector.net/extras/ekg-1.7-0.2.rc2.src.rpm - add dist tag - add license files to libgadu and ekg - remove reduntant python BR - fix parallel make build -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 6 17:52:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 13:52:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205309] Review Request: perl-Algorithm-C3 - Module for merging hierarchies using the C3 algorithm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609061752.k86Hqud2008320@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Algorithm-C3 - Module for merging hierarchies using the C3 algorithm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205309 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-09-06 13:52 EST ------- Why do you use Build instead of the more classical Makefile.PL? I personally don't care, but it is not what is proposed in the README. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 6 17:55:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 13:55:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193820] Review Request: libcm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609061755.k86Htim9008552@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libcm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193820 sandmann at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO_REPORTER |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX ------- Additional Comments From sandmann at redhat.com 2006-09-06 13:55 EST ------- Yes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 6 18:02:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 14:02:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196793] Review Request: php-pear-MDB2 - PEAR: Database Abstraction Layer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609061802.k86I2t62009073@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-MDB2 - PEAR: Database Abstraction Layer Alias: php-pear-MDB2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196793 ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2006-09-06 14:02 EST ------- SPEC: http://tkmame.retrogames.com/fedora-extras/php-pear-MDB2.spec SRPM: http://tkmame.retrogames.com/fedora-extras/php-pear-MDB2-2.2.2-1.src.rpm %changelog * Wed Sep 06 2006 Christopher Stone 2.2.2-1 - Upstream sync - Update spec to latest template -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 6 18:06:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 14:06:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205059] Review Request: perl-POE-Filter-Zlib - POE filter wrapped around Compress::Zlib In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609061806.k86I6R2Y009331@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-POE-Filter-Zlib - POE filter wrapped around Compress::Zlib https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205059 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 6 18:07:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 14:07:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205360] Review Request: gnucap - GNU Circuit Analysis Package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609061807.k86I7Op7009423@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnucap - GNU Circuit Analysis Package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205360 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 6 18:19:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 14:19:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204525] Review Request: eclipse-gef - Eclipse Graphical Editing Framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609061819.k86IJOOd010617@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-gef - Eclipse Graphical Editing Framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204525 overholt at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From overholt at redhat.com 2006-09-06 14:19 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > I recommend changing this to > "System Environment/Libraries", since that's all this really is. Done. > W: eclipse-gef invalid-license Eclipse Public License - v 1.0 (EPL) > > > Please just change this to "Eclipse Public License". We don't put URLs here. Done. > W: eclipse-gef no-documentation > > The packaging rules say... > "If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its > own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package > must be included in %doc." > > I realize that Eclipse & friends install license somewhere else by default, but > we should really put a copy in this directory as well as per the packaging > guidelines. Eventually this should be done for all Eclipse packages. I think > maybe only one or two do this today. Okay, I've added the epl to a GEF-owned directory. > ========= eclipse-gef-examples-3.2.0-2.i386.rpm > W: eclipse-gef-examples non-standard-group Text Editors/Integrated Development > Environments (IDE) > W: eclipse-gef-examples invalid-license Eclipse Public License - v 1.0 (EPL) > > > As above. Done. > ========= eclipse-gef-sdk-3.2.0-2.i386.rpm > W: eclipse-gef-sdk non-standard-group Text Editors/Integrated Development > Environments (IDE) > > I think this should be "Documentation". I'm not sure I agree with this as it contains source plugins as well but I've done it :) > W: eclipse-gef-sdk invalid-license Eclipse Public License - v 1.0 (EPL) > > > As above. Done. > W: eclipse-gef-sdk no-documentation > > I think this is ignoreable. > > ========= eclipse-gef-3.2.0-2.src.rpm > W: eclipse-gef non-standard-group Text Editors/Integrated Development > Environments (IDE) > W: eclipse-gef invalid-license Eclipse Public License - v 1.0 (EPL) > > > As above. Yup. > W: eclipse-gef mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs > > Just run emacs untabify on the spec file before building. Fixed. I get no output from rpmlint when I run it. Updated spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/~overholt/eclipse-gef.spec Updated SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/~overholt/eclipse-gef-3.2.0-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 6 18:21:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 14:21:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196749] Review Request: php-pecl-xdebug - PECL package for debugging PHP scripts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609061821.k86ILYxC010991@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pecl-xdebug - PECL package for debugging PHP scripts Alias: php-pecl-xdebug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196749 ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2006-09-06 14:21 EST ------- SPEC: http://tkmame.retrogames.com/fedora-extras/php-pecl-xdebug.spec SRPM: http://tkmame.retrogames.com/fedora-extras/php-pecl-xdebug-2.0.0-0.1.beta6.src.rpm %changelog * Wed Sep 06 2006 Christopher Stone 2.0.0-0.1.beta6 - Remove Provides php-xdebug - Fix Release - Remove prior changelog due to Release number change -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 6 18:34:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 14:34:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205059] Review Request: perl-POE-Filter-Zlib - POE filter wrapped around Compress::Zlib In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609061834.k86IYQ5p013062@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-POE-Filter-Zlib - POE filter wrapped around Compress::Zlib https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205059 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-09-06 14:34 EST ------- 329825354 Perl modules on the Wall... Note that 1.5 came out just before you submitted this, but I don't think that's a blocker. Too bad he still won't include any information on the licensing of his modules. * source files match upstream: ee3c93a09f4640bd42a5781375a48082 POE-Filter-Zlib-1.4.tar.gz * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * dist tag is present. * build root is correct. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. Correspondence clarifying the license is included. X latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: perl(POE::Filter::Zlib) = 1.4 perl(POE::Filter::Zlib::Stream) = 1.4 perl-POE-Filter-Zlib = 1.4-1.fc6 = perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8) perl(Carp) perl(Compress::Zlib) perl(POE::Filter) perl(base) perl(vars) * %check is present and all tests pass: All tests successful. Files=3, Tests=13, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.10 cusr + 0.04 csys = 0.14 CPU) * package is not relocatable. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no libtool .la droppings. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 6 18:56:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 14:56:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205343] Review Request: cohoba - Cohoba is a GNOME interface for Telepathy. It aims to be innovative and simple In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609061856.k86Iuoeh016652@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cohoba - Cohoba is a GNOME interface for Telepathy. It aims to be innovative and simple https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205343 bdpepple at ameritech.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |205031 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 6 18:56:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 14:56:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205031] Review Request: python-telepathy - Python libraries for Telepathy In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609061856.k86Iupuo016667@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-telepathy - Python libraries for Telepathy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205031 bdpepple at ameritech.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |205343 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 6 18:58:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 14:58:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205343] Review Request: cohoba - Cohoba is a GNOME interface for Telepathy. It aims to be innovative and simple In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609061858.k86Iwkho017177@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cohoba - Cohoba is a GNOME interface for Telepathy. It aims to be innovative and simple https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205343 ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at ameritech.net 2006-09-06 14:58 EST ------- This should have a desktop file, since it is a gui app. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 6 18:59:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 14:59:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196749] Review Request: php-pecl-xdebug - PECL package for debugging PHP scripts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609061859.k86IxLi9017348@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pecl-xdebug - PECL package for debugging PHP scripts Alias: php-pecl-xdebug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196749 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-09-06 14:59 EST ------- Looks good to me now. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 6 19:05:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 15:05:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202356] Review Request: terminus-font - Clean fixed width font In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609061905.k86J52L0018669@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: terminus-font - Clean fixed width font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202356 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 6 19:05:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 15:05:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203190] Review Request: netlabel_tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609061905.k86J5PuW018803@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: netlabel_tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203190 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 6 19:10:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 15:10:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193820] Review Request: libcm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609061910.k86JALff019170@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libcm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193820 jkeating at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|188267 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 6 19:31:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 15:31:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205504] New: Review Request: rum - rug-like interface for yum Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205504 Summary: Review Request: rum - rug-like interface for yum Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: snorp at snorp.net QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.snorp.net/files/rum/rum.spec SRPM URL: http://www.snorp.net/files/rum/rum-1.0.0-1.src.rpm Description: rum is a rug-like interface for yum -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 6 19:36:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 15:36:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205504] Review Request: rum - rug-like interface for yum In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609061936.k86JaDB7022780@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rum - rug-like interface for yum https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205504 snorp at snorp.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |177841 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From snorp at snorp.net 2006-09-06 15:36 EST ------- Oops, I should mention that this is my first package and I would need a sponsor, etc. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 6 19:36:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 15:36:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 185776] Review Request: gitweb In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609061936.k86JaAP4022771@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gitweb https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=185776 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |201449 nThis| | Flag|needinfo?(bkyoung at users.sour| |ceforge.net) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 6 19:37:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 15:37:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205504] Review Request: rum - rug-like interface for yum In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609061937.k86Jbrdg022998@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rum - rug-like interface for yum https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205504 snorp at snorp.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |163776 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 6 19:43:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 15:43:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177105] Review Request: gnomeradio - Graphical FM-Tuner program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609061943.k86Jho8u023456@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnomeradio - Graphical FM-Tuner program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177105 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |tibbs at math.uh.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 6 19:50:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 15:50:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205504] Review Request: rum - rug-like interface for yum In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609061950.k86Jomij024068@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rum - rug-like interface for yum https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205504 rstrode at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |rstrode at redhat.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 6 19:56:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 15:56:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177512] Review Request: mysql-connector-net In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609061956.k86Jut2V024575@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mysql-connector-net https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177512 paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |205300 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-09-06 15:56 EST ------- Spec Name or Url: http://www.knox.net.nz/~nodoid/mysql-connector-net.spec Now FC-5 and FC-6/rawhide happy. FC-6 though will need BZ#205300 built and installed first (BR gtk-sharp-devel) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 6 19:57:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 15:57:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205300] Review Request: gtk-sharp - a set of mono bindings for gtk1.2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609061957.k86JvG8T024602@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtk-sharp - a set of mono bindings for gtk1.2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205300 paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177512 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 6 20:01:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 16:01:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205504] Review Request: rum - rug-like interface for yum In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609062001.k86K1YY9024898@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rum - rug-like interface for yum https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205504 ------- Additional Comments From rstrode at redhat.com 2006-09-06 16:01 EST ------- So at first glance, the package spec file looks great. Did you run it through rpmlint? If so, any spew? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 6 20:02:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 16:02:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201656] Review Request: gstm-1.2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609062002.k86K2gTG024959@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gstm-1.2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201656 splinux25 at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 6 20:03:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 16:03:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196749] Review Request: php-pecl-xdebug - PECL package for debugging PHP scripts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609062003.k86K38q7025015@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pecl-xdebug - PECL package for debugging PHP scripts Alias: php-pecl-xdebug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196749 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 6 20:03:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 16:03:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196847] Review Request: php-pear-PHPUnit2 - PEAR: Regression testing framework for unit tests In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609062003.k86K39UZ025028@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-PHPUnit2 - PEAR: Regression testing framework for unit tests Alias: php-pear-PHPUnit2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196847 Bug 196847 depends on bug 196749, which changed state. Bug 196749 Summary: Review Request: php-pecl-xdebug - PECL package for debugging PHP scripts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196749 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 6 20:03:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 16:03:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196837] Review Request: php-pear-PHPUnit2-alpha - PEAR: Regression testing framework for unit tests In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609062003.k86K3gIB025101@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-PHPUnit2-alpha - PEAR: Regression testing framework for unit tests Alias: pear-PHPUnit2-alpha https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196837 Bug 196837 depends on bug 196749, which changed state. Bug 196749 Summary: Review Request: php-pecl-xdebug - PECL package for debugging PHP scripts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196749 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 6 20:04:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 16:04:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196793] Review Request: php-pear-MDB2 - PEAR: Database Abstraction Layer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609062004.k86K4lVx025159@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-MDB2 - PEAR: Database Abstraction Layer Alias: php-pear-MDB2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196793 Fedora at FamilleCollet.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 6 20:11:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 16:11:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205504] Review Request: rum - rug-like interface for yum In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609062011.k86KBv0Z025772@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rum - rug-like interface for yum https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205504 ------- Additional Comments From snorp at snorp.net 2006-09-06 16:11 EST ------- Yeah, it gives me this: W: rum summary-not-capitalized rum is a rug-like interface for yum E: rum non-executable-script /usr/share/rum/rummain.py 0644 E: rum non-executable-script /usr/share/rum/i18n.py 0644 E: rum zero-length /usr/share/doc/rum-1.0.0/ChangeLog All of that seems fairly benign to me, but what do I know :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 6 20:22:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 16:22:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196793] Review Request: php-pear-MDB2 - PEAR: Database Abstraction Layer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609062022.k86KMeQ2026641@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-MDB2 - PEAR: Database Abstraction Layer Alias: php-pear-MDB2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196793 ------- Additional Comments From Fedora at FamilleCollet.com 2006-09-06 16:22 EST ------- Can't assign this bug to myself for the moment. Will do the review ASAP. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 6 20:25:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 16:25:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205504] Review Request: rum - rug-like interface for yum In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609062025.k86KP3Y2026967@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rum - rug-like interface for yum https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205504 rstrode at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778, 177841 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From rstrode at redhat.com 2006-09-06 16:24 EST ------- cool. And the srpm builds okay in mock? If so, seems fine. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 6 20:25:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 16:25:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177105] Review Request: gnomeradio - Graphical FM-Tuner program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609062025.k86KPnH8027179@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnomeradio - Graphical FM-Tuner program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177105 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-09-06 16:25 EST ------- OK, this should be easy because of all of the other review work. It looks like your BuildRequires: pkgconfig is not strictly necessary on FC6 at least, but i doesn't harm anything. rpmlint only says: W: gnomeradio non-conffile-in-etc /etc/gconf/schemas/gnomeradio.schemas which in this case is bogus. It looks like /usr/share/omf is unowned; I don't see anything in the dependency chain that would create it. It seems that a whole pile of packages own it already, so it seems the expectation is that you should own it as well. * source files match upstream: 07b9d511f79e38f114af51cc7bfc014a gnomeradio-1.6.tar.gz * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * dist tag is present. * build root is correct. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. License text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. O BuildRequires are proper. * compiler flags are appropriate. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * debuginfo package looks complete. * rpmlint has only ignorable complaints. * final provides and requires are sane: gnomeradio = 1.6-2.fc6 = /bin/sh GConf2 libICE.so.6()(64bit) libORBit-2.so.0()(64bit) libSM.so.6()(64bit) libX11.so.6()(64bit) libart_lgpl_2.so.2()(64bit) libatk-1.0.so.0()(64bit) libbonobo-2.so.0()(64bit) libbonobo-activation.so.4()(64bit) libbonoboui-2.so.0()(64bit) libcairo.so.2()(64bit) libgconf-2.so.4()(64bit) libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libglib-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgmodule-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgnome-2.so.0()(64bit) libgnome-keyring.so.0()(64bit) libgnomecanvas-2.so.0()(64bit) libgnomeui-2.so.0()(64bit) libgnomevfs-2.so.0()(64bit) libgobject-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgthread-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0()(64bit) liblirc_client.so.0()(64bit) libpango-1.0.so.0()(64bit) libpangocairo-1.0.so.0()(64bit) libpangoft2-1.0.so.0()(64bit) libpopt.so.0()(64bit) libxml2.so.2()(64bit) libz.so.1()(64bit) scrollkeeper * %check is not present; no test suite upstream. * no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. * package is not relocatable. ? owns the directories it creates (/usr/share/omf?) * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * scriptlets present are OK (gconf schema installation, scrollkeeper-update) * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no libtool .la droppings. * GUI app; desktop file looks to be installed properly. So it's just the /usr/share/omf thing that needs fixing or clarification. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 6 20:27:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 16:27:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196793] Review Request: php-pear-MDB2 - PEAR: Database Abstraction Layer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609062027.k86KRVoH027352@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-MDB2 - PEAR: Database Abstraction Layer Alias: php-pear-MDB2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196793 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |Fedora at FamilleCollet.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 6 20:29:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 16:29:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205504] Review Request: rum - rug-like interface for yum In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609062029.k86KTZCM027490@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rum - rug-like interface for yum https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205504 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-09-06 16:29 EST ------- In general you shouldn't package zero length files. Also, the description is somewhat lacking. Even if it's supposed that I know what "yum" is, I have little chance of knowing what "rug" might be. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 6 20:31:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 16:31:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205059] Review Request: perl-POE-Filter-Zlib - POE filter wrapped around Compress::Zlib In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609062031.k86KVUGk027612@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-POE-Filter-Zlib - POE filter wrapped around Compress::Zlib https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205059 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-09-06 16:31 EST ------- +Import to CVS +Add to owners.list +Bump release, build for devel +devel build succeeds +Request branching (FC-5) +Close bug Updated to 1.5, as well. Thanks for the review! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 6 20:36:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 16:36:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204493] Review Request: perl-Mozilla-DOM - Perl interface to Mozilla DOM In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609062036.k86KanUw028172@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Mozilla-DOM - Perl interface to Mozilla DOM https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204493 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-09-06 16:36 EST ------- Hrm... is it being replaced by anything? perl-Gtk2-MozEmbed (bug 204494) will be impacted as well. Both packages suggest that they can use firefox, but FC-5 doesn't seem to have the requisite bits in placel; if there's some sort of "embedded mozilla library" FC-6 will be using I can take a look at getting this to build against that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 6 20:38:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 16:38:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205309] Review Request: perl-Algorithm-C3 - Module for merging hierarchies using the C3 algorithm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609062038.k86KcdhP028375@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Algorithm-C3 - Module for merging hierarchies using the C3 algorithm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205309 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-09-06 16:38 EST ------- Build with Build.PL is what cpanspec spits out by default if available, as (I'm guessing here it's motivation here) it is a newer model. >From my perspective, it builds just fine, and if upstream ever decides to drop Makefile.PL support we're all set. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 6 20:47:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 16:47:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204832] Review Request: wxMaxima - wxWidgets interface for maxima In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609062047.k86KlkPk029193@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wxMaxima - wxWidgets interface for maxima https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204832 ------- Additional Comments From gemi at bluewin.ch 2006-09-06 16:47 EST ------- -> In the description there is a duplicate "the the". Otherwise everything is fine. Builds in mock FC4 and devel. rpmlint is silent. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 6 20:48:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 16:48:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205343] Review Request: cohoba - Cohoba is a GNOME interface for Telepathy. It aims to be innovative and simple In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609062048.k86KmpUf029338@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cohoba - Cohoba is a GNOME interface for Telepathy. It aims to be innovative and simple https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205343 ------- Additional Comments From sander at hoentjen.eu 2006-09-06 16:48 EST ------- Ok, I thought it didn't need it because the way you normally start it is because you add it to the panel. I will fix this soon -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 6 20:52:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 16:52:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205504] Review Request: rum - rug-like interface for yum In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609062052.k86KqCBo029620@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rum - rug-like interface for yum https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205504 ------- Additional Comments From snorp at snorp.net 2006-09-06 16:51 EST ------- Ok, I changed the description to: rum is a rug-like interface for yum (Yellowdog Updater Modified). rug is the command-line frontend for rcd (Red Carpet Daemon). And removed the empty ChangeLog -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 6 20:53:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 16:53:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205504] Review Request: rum - rug-like interface for yum In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609062053.k86KrocE029713@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rum - rug-like interface for yum https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205504 ------- Additional Comments From snorp at snorp.net 2006-09-06 16:53 EST ------- Bah, I meant: rum is a rug-like interface for yum (Yellow dog Updater, Modified). rug is the command-line frontend for rcd (Red Carpet Daemon). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 6 20:56:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 16:56:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205127] Review Request: ekg - A client compatible with Gadu-Gadu In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609062056.k86KugVB030025@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ekg - A client compatible with Gadu-Gadu https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205127 mr.ecik at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mr.ecik at gmail.com 2006-09-06 16:56 EST ------- Approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 6 21:04:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 17:04:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200438] Review Request: tango-icon-theme - Icons from Tango Project In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609062104.k86L4YKH031201@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tango-icon-theme - Icons from Tango Project https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200438 bdpepple at ameritech.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |bdpepple at ameritech.net OtherBugsDependingO|163776, 177841 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at ameritech.net 2006-09-06 17:04 EST ------- MD5Sums: eace48f8340a95d7134632bad6287100 tango-icon-theme-0.7.2.tar.gz Good: * Source URL is canonical * Upstream source tarball verified * Package name conforms to the Fedora Naming Guideline * Group Tag is from the official list * Buildroot has all required elements * All paths begin with macros * All directories are owned by this or other packages * All necessary BuildRequires listed. * All desired features are enabled * Builds fine in mock. * rpmlint gives the following error that can be ignored: W: tango-icon-theme invalid-license Creative Commons Attribution Share-Alike Minor: * Unnecessary BR: automake isn't needed. This needs to be fixed before importing into CVS. +1 APPROVED, and I'll be your sponsor. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/Contributors#head-a89c07b5b8abe7748b6b39f0f89768d595234907 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 6 21:05:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 17:05:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199108] Review Request: gutenprint: Printer Drivers Package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609062105.k86L5mnQ031445@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gutenprint: Printer Drivers Package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199108 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |kevin at tummy.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-09-06 17:05 EST ------- OK - Package name OK - Spec file matches base package name. OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines. OK - License (GPL) OK - License field in spec matches OK - License file included in package OK - Spec in American English OK - Spec is legible. OK - Sources match upstream md5sum: ede8acbd1e94c9d4fd366fb37e335bfb gutenprint-5.0.0.tar.bz2 ede8acbd1e94c9d4fd366fb37e335bfb gutenprint-5.0.0.tar.bz2.1 OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch. OK - BuildRequires correct OK - Spec handles locales/find_lang See below - Spec has needed ldconfig in post and postun OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files. OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. OK - Package has a correct %clean section. See below - Spec has consistant macro usage. OK - Package is code or permissible content. OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime. OK - Headers/static libs in -devel subpackage. OK - .pc files in -devel subpackage. OK - .so files in -devel subpackage. OK - -devel package Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} OK - .la files are removed. OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. See below - No rpmlint output. SHOULD Items: OK - Should include License or ask upstream to include it. See below - Should build in mock. OK - Should have subpackages require base package with fully versioned depend. Issues: 1. No need for the: Requires(post): /sbin/ldconfig Requires(postun): /sbin/ldconfig Using post/postun with -p /sbin/ldconfig adds the dependency for you. 2. You're mixing the %{buildroot} and the $RPM_BUILD_ROOT macros. Try and pick one and use only that style... 3. The package doesn't seem to build under mock/devel/i386: RPM build errors: File not found by glob: /var/tmp/gutenprint-5.0.0-0.7.fc6-root-mockbuild/ usr/lib/gimp/*/plug-ins/print The plug-ins directory there is empty. Perhaps a missing BuildRequires or something that's preventing the plug-ins from being built? Removing that from the files list gets it to build. 4. rpmlint says: W: gutenprint macro-in-%changelog doc W: gutenprint macro-in-%changelog configure rpm will expand macros even in changelogs. Change them to %%doc and %%configure to prevent this. W: gutenprint mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs Should pick one or the other. W: gutenprint-cups no-documentation W: gutenprint-extras no-documentation W: gutenprint-foomatic no-documentation W: gutenprint-ppds-cs no-documentation W: gutenprint-ppds-da no-documentation W: gutenprint-ppds-de no-documentation W: gutenprint-ppds-el no-documentation W: gutenprint-ppds-en_GB no-documentation W: gutenprint-ppds-es no-documentation W: gutenprint-ppds-fr no-documentation W: gutenprint-ppds-hu no-documentation W: gutenprint-ppds-ja no-documentation W: gutenprint-ppds-nb no-documentation W: gutenprint-ppds-nl no-documentation W: gutenprint-ppds-pl no-documentation W: gutenprint-ppds-pt no-documentation W: gutenprint-ppds-sk no-documentation W: gutenprint-ppds-sv no-documentation W: gutenprint-ppds-zh_TW no-documentation All those can be ignored. 5. Might include Changelog as a %doc? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 6 21:12:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 17:12:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205343] Review Request: cohoba - Cohoba is a GNOME interface for Telepathy. It aims to be innovative and simple In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609062112.k86LCosY032564@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cohoba - Cohoba is a GNOME interface for Telepathy. It aims to be innovative and simple https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205343 ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at ameritech.net 2006-09-06 17:12 EST ------- Is it a panel applet? If so, your right that it doesn't need a desktop file. I also noticed that it looks like you missing some necessary requires (gnome-python2 and gnome-python2-applet). Once python-telepathy gets into FE, I'll do a formal review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 6 21:17:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 17:17:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 185423] Review Request: php-pear-PEAR-Command-Packaging: make-rpm-spec command for PEAR In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609062117.k86LHotl000825@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-PEAR-Command-Packaging: make-rpm-spec command for PEAR Alias: php-pear-PCP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=185423 ------- Additional Comments From Fedora at FamilleCollet.com 2006-09-06 17:17 EST ------- You can also have a look on a ready template for "pear makerpm" at http://remi.collet.free.fr/rpms/SPEC/php-pear-1.4.11-template.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 6 21:44:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 17:44:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196793] Review Request: php-pear-MDB2 - PEAR: Database Abstraction Layer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609062144.k86LibRB002418@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-MDB2 - PEAR: Database Abstraction Layer Alias: php-pear-MDB2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196793 ------- Additional Comments From Fedora at FamilleCollet.com 2006-09-06 17:44 EST ------- Build and install fine on FC5. rpmlint is ok. previous version build in mock (mock broken for me on this moment). all MUST items are OK. Great job done on this template. I also though "including a BSD license would be nice :)" but i never find one good copy. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 6 21:45:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 17:45:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196793] Review Request: php-pear-MDB2 - PEAR: Database Abstraction Layer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609062145.k86LjBgH002462@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-MDB2 - PEAR: Database Abstraction Layer Alias: php-pear-MDB2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196793 Fedora at FamilleCollet.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 6 21:47:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 17:47:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205309] Review Request: perl-Algorithm-C3 - Module for merging hierarchies using the C3 algorithm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609062147.k86Ll5up002543@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Algorithm-C3 - Module for merging hierarchies using the C3 algorithm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205309 jpo at di.uminho.pt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jpo at di.uminho.pt ------- Additional Comments From jpo at di.uminho.pt 2006-09-06 17:47 EST ------- A couple of notes about "Makefile.PL vs Build.PL" or "ExtUtils::MakeMaker vs Module::Build" 1. If a perl distro includes both the Build.PL and the Makefile.PL file, there are good chances that the Makefile.PL has been generated from the Build.PL file. In these cases is better to package the module using Build.PL (BR: perl(Module::Build). Note: in the past the generated Makefile.PL not always installed correctly. 2. In the past the documentation of Module::Build stated that Module::Build *would* replace ExtUtils::MakeMaker. This now has been corrected (see the Module::Build changelog) and both installation methods will be supported. 3. In the past the Michael G Schwern's presentation "MakeMaker Is DOOMED! or MakeMaker is dead! Long live Module::Build!" also caused some confusion. (http://schwern.org/~schwern/talks/MakeMaker_Is_DOOMED/slides/slide001.html) Michael Schwern was at the time the perl test guy and the maintainer of ExtUtils::MakeMaker. 4. Module::Build is a perl core module since perl 5.9.4. Perl 5.10 will supported Makefile.PL and Build.PL natively. Right now Module::Build must be installed from CPAN or from a package repository. Module::Build is rather important as it doesn't require external utilities such as make (and its flavours) which is a must if you must support lot of platforms (UNIX, VMS, Win32, ...) jpo -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 6 21:47:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 17:47:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205075] Review Request: fwbackups - a user backup program, with support for automated backups and on-demand backups In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609062147.k86Llmrh002558@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fwbackups - a user backup program, with support for automated backups and on-demand backups https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205075 ------- Additional Comments From s.adam at diffingo.com 2006-09-06 17:47 EST ------- I've made new a nwe SRPM / Spec: Spec URL: http://www.diffingo.com/downloads/FWBackups/fwbackups.spec SRPM URL: http://www.diffingo.com/downloads/FWBackups/fwbackups-1.42-3.src.rpm Thanks, Stewart -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 6 22:08:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 18:08:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205309] Review Request: perl-Algorithm-C3 - Module for merging hierarchies using the C3 algorithm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609062208.k86M8EL7003346@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Algorithm-C3 - Module for merging hierarchies using the C3 algorithm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205309 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-09-06 18:08 EST ------- Thanks for the most excellent summary, Jose :) Would you mind if I posted that on the wiki somewhere? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 6 22:16:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 18:16:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196793] Review Request: php-pear-MDB2 - PEAR: Database Abstraction Layer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609062216.k86MGKvc003610@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-MDB2 - PEAR: Database Abstraction Layer Alias: php-pear-MDB2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196793 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 6 22:16:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 18:16:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190101] Review Request: php-pear-Log In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609062216.k86MGgg9003637@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Log Alias: php-pear-Log https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190101 Bug 190101 depends on bug 196793, which changed state. Bug 196793 Summary: Review Request: php-pear-MDB2 - PEAR: Database Abstraction Layer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196793 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 6 22:22:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 18:22:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190101] Review Request: php-pear-Log In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609062222.k86MMxvs003798@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Log Alias: php-pear-Log https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190101 ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2006-09-06 18:22 EST ------- Hi Remi, since I need this built for FC-5, can you update the spec file to match as closely as possible the latest template: http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/*checkout*/fedora-rpmdevtools/spectemplate-php-pear.spec?root=fedora&rev=1.4&sortby=date You may also want to include changes that hanvn't been officially committed to cvs yet: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=135697 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 6 23:01:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 19:01:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202006] Review Request: fmio - FM radio card manipulation utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609062301.k86N1XOx005247@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fmio - FM radio card manipulation utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202006 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-09-06 19:01 EST ------- My mistake. I had an old copy of one of your patches that I used in my mock build. ;( So, on a clean setup with the 2.0.8-7 version I now get from rpmlint: W: fmio no-soname /usr/lib/libradio.so W: fmio strange-permission fmio-gq-wrapper.py 0755 W: fmio-devel no-documentation So, I think thats fixed all the blockers I see... This package is APPROVED. Don't forget to close this bug with NEXTRELEASE once it's been imported and built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 6 23:13:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 19:13:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205309] Review Request: perl-Algorithm-C3 - Module for merging hierarchies using the C3 algorithm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609062313.k86NDdGV005629@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Algorithm-C3 - Module for merging hierarchies using the C3 algorithm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205309 ------- Additional Comments From jpo at di.uminho.pt 2006-09-06 19:13 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > Thanks for the most excellent summary, Jose :) Would you mind if I posted that > on the wiki somewhere? Not at all! Go ahead. One other thing that I should be placing in the wiki is this rather outdated document http://gsd.di.uminho.pt/jpo/perl/specfiles/. Do you know a good tool to convert HTML pages into wiki formats? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 6 23:27:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 19:27:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205537] New: Review Request: perl-Test-Object - Thoroughly testing objects via registered handlers Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205537 Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-Object - Thoroughly testing objects via registered handlers Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jpo at di.uminho.pt QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: ftp://perl.di.uminho.pt/pub/fedora/perl-Test-Object.spec SRPM URL: ftp://perl.di.uminho.pt/pub/fedora/perl-Test-Object-0.06-1.src.rpm Description: Test::Object is a testing package designed to allow you to easily test what you believe is a valid object against the expected behaviour of all of the classes in its inheritance tree in one single call. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 6 23:28:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 19:28:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204525] Review Request: eclipse-gef - Eclipse Graphical Editing Framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609062328.k86NScYQ006107@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-gef - Eclipse Graphical Editing Framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204525 green at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(overholt at redhat.co| |m) | ------- Additional Comments From green at redhat.com 2006-09-06 19:28 EST ------- Almost there :-) See the lines starting with "X". * package meets and packaging guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. X dist tag is not present. Add %{?dist} to Release tag. X build root is not correct. Use... %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * License text included in package. * source files match upstream (extracted from upstream cvs so no md5sum available.) * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * package builds in mock ( ). X rpmlint on eclipse-gef says: W: eclipse-gef-sdk no-documentation It looks like you put the %docs in the examples package instead of the eclipse-gef package. * final provides and requires are sane: eclipse-gef-3.2.0-2.i386.rpm org.eclipse.draw2d_3.2.0.R32_Maintenance.jar.so org.eclipse.gef_3.2.100.R32_Maintenance.jar.so eclipse-gef = 3.2.0-2 = /usr/bin/rebuild-gcj-db /usr/bin/rebuild-gcj-db eclipse-platform eclipse-platform >= 1:3.2.0 java-gcj-compat >= 1.0.33 java-gcj-compat >= 1.0.33 eclipse-pde gcc-java >= 4.0.2 java-gcj-compat-devel >= 1.0.33 eclipse-gef-examples-3.2.0-2.i386.rpm org.eclipse.gef.examples.flow_3.2.0.R32_Maintenance.jar.so org.eclipse.gef.examples.logic_3.2.0.R32_Maintenance.jar.so org.eclipse.gef.examples.shapes_3.2.0.R32_Maintenance.jar.so org.eclipse.gef.examples.text_3.2.0.R32_Maintenance.jar.so eclipse-gef-examples = 3.2.0-2 = eclipse-gef = 3.2.0-2 eclipse-gef-sdk = 3.2.0-2 eclipse-gef-sdk-3.2.0-2.i386.rpm eclipse-gef-sdk = 3.2.0-2 = eclipse-gef = 3.2.0-2 * shared libraries are present, but no ldconfig required. * package is not relocatable. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * %clean is present. * %check is not present * scriptlets OK * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no libtool .la droppings. * not a GUI app (no .desktop file required). * not a web app. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 6 23:32:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 19:32:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205537] Review Request: perl-Test-Object - Thoroughly testing objects via registered handlers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609062332.k86NWDuY006204@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-Object - Thoroughly testing objects via registered handlers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205537 ------- Additional Comments From jpo at di.uminho.pt 2006-09-06 19:32 EST ------- Notes to reviewer(s): * The requirement 'Test::Builder' => '0.62' is wrong. I believe the author wanted the version to be 0.32 (the module version included in perl 5.8.8). - This doesn't abort the built (=> no patch) - This issue has already been raised in CPAN's RT system (http://rt.cpan.org/Public/Bug/Display.html?id=21278) * This module is a new requirement of PPI 1.117. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 6 23:34:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 19:34:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 195222] Review Request: paman: Management tool for PulseAudio In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609062334.k86NYmwE006327@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: paman: Management tool for PulseAudio https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195222 bdpepple at ameritech.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |bdpepple at ameritech.net OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 6 23:39:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 19:39:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 195222] Review Request: paman: Management tool for PulseAudio In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609062339.k86NdKJ5006478@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: paman: Management tool for PulseAudio https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195222 ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at ameritech.net 2006-09-06 19:39 EST ------- MD5Sums: 87dcb41a2c3740eff2e33c094010bb40 paman-0.9.2.tar.gz Good: * Source URL is canonical * Upstream source tarball verified * Package name conforms to the Fedora Naming Guidelines * Group Tag is from the official list * Buildroot has all required elements * All paths begin with macros * All directories are owned by this or other packages * All necessary BuildRequires listed. * All desired features are enabled * Builds fine in mock. * rpmlint produces no errors. Bad: * MustFix: Desktop file handling does not conform to FE guidelines. Refer to http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-254ddf07aae20a23ced8cecc219d8f73926e9755 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 6 23:42:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 19:42:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 195223] Review Request: pavucontrol: Volume control for PulseAudio In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609062342.k86NgFN5006546@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pavucontrol: Volume control for PulseAudio https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195223 ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at ameritech.net 2006-09-06 19:42 EST ------- Quick note: 1. Desktop file handling does not conform to Fe guidelines. Refer to http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-254ddf07aae20a23ced8cecc219d8f73926e9755 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 7 00:25:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 20:25:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196837] Review Request: php-pear-PHPUnit2-alpha - PEAR: Regression testing framework for unit tests In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609070025.k870Pxuh007860@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-PHPUnit2-alpha - PEAR: Regression testing framework for unit tests Alias: pear-PHPUnit2-alpha https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196837 ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2006-09-06 20:25 EST ------- Update Release: SPEC: http://tkmame.retrogames.com/fedora-extras/php-pear-PHPUnit2-alpha.spec SRPM: http://tkmame.retrogames.com/fedora-extras/php-pear-PHPUnit2-alpha-3.0.0-0.1.alpha11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 7 00:27:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 20:27:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204493] Review Request: perl-Mozilla-DOM - Perl interface to Mozilla DOM In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609070027.k870R77A007885@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Mozilla-DOM - Perl interface to Mozilla DOM https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204493 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-09-06 20:27 EST ------- I think long-term the intended solution is something called xulrunner, but I know nothing of it. In FC6 there's firefox-devel which seems to include the same stuff, but in a "firefox-*" directory instead of "mozilla-*". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 7 00:31:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 20:31:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204525] Review Request: eclipse-gef - Eclipse Graphical Editing Framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609070031.k870VJlh008039@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-gef - Eclipse Graphical Editing Framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204525 ------- Additional Comments From overholt at redhat.com 2006-09-06 20:30 EST ------- (In reply to comment #7) > X dist tag is not present. Add %{?dist} to Release tag. Fixed. > X build root is not correct. Use... > %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) Fixed. > X rpmlint on eclipse-gef says: > W: eclipse-gef-sdk no-documentation > It looks like you put the %docs in the examples package instead of the Fixed. Updated spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/~overholt/eclipse-gef.spec Updated SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/~overholt/eclipse-gef-3.2.0-2.fc6.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 7 00:37:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 20:37:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204832] Review Request: wxMaxima - wxWidgets interface for maxima In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609070037.k870bh1n008211@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wxMaxima - wxWidgets interface for maxima https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204832 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-09-06 20:37 EST ------- Umm, this bug is still NEW, is still blocking FE-NEW and is not assigned to anyone. Why is someone approving it? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 7 00:57:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 20:57:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197417] Review Request: php-pear-Validate - PEAR: Validation class In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609070057.k870v6tl008782@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Validate - PEAR: Validation class Alias: php-pear-Validate https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197417 ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2006-09-06 20:57 EST ------- SPEC: http://tkmame.retrogames.com/fedora-extras/php-pear-Validate.spec SRPM: http://tkmame.retrogames.com/fedora-extras/php-pear-Validate-0.6.4-1.src.rpm %changelog * Wed Sep 06 2006 Christopher Stone 0.6.4-1 - Upstream sync -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 7 01:19:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 21:19:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193897] Review Request: mysql-connector-java - Official JDBC driver for MySQL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609070119.k871Ju51009493@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mysql-connector-java - Official JDBC driver for MySQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193897 ifoox at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(ifoox at redhat.com) | ------- Additional Comments From ifoox at redhat.com 2006-09-06 21:19 EST ------- New Files: http://people.redhat.com/ifoox/extras/mysql-connector-java-3.1.12-1jpp_3fc.src.rpm http://people.redhat.com/ifoox/extras/mysql-connector-java.spec Thanks for the extensive review Anthony, and sorry for taking so long to finish this up. I've removed all of the binary jars from the tarball, most were not even used and the ones that were are present after all BRs are satisfied. I've also fixed the README duplication. I'm trying to resolve the jta issue right now. It seems that yum install 'jta >= 1.0' gives me the correct geronim-specs-compat package but mock is giving me problems. I'm caching mock's rpms at the moment so I can do mock builds faster, so I hope to resolve the issue by tomorrow at most. If I can't make it work then making it depend on geronimo-specs-compat seems like a valid option. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 7 01:35:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 21:35:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193897] Review Request: mysql-connector-java - Official JDBC driver for MySQL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609070135.k871Zsmr009978@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mysql-connector-java - Official JDBC driver for MySQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193897 ------- Additional Comments From ifoox at redhat.com 2006-09-06 21:35 EST ------- It seems that after removing the '0:' epoch from the BRs, jta gets resolved normally. Unfortunately mock gives me this: [build at treason srpms]$ /usr/sbin/mock-helper yum --installroot /var/lib/mock/fedora-development-i386-core/root resolvedep 'ant-contrib' No Package Found for ant-contrib But that may happen because ant-contrib only got built yesterday, so hopefully that will get resolved as mirrors get updated. When I do yum install ant-contrib on my machine, it works fine. Can anyone else give this a try? If this works, I think that's the last item that needed to get resolved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 7 02:37:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 22:37:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205062] Review Request: perl-Sub-Install - Install subroutines into packages easily In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609070237.k872bJFk012636@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Sub-Install - Install subroutines into packages easily https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205062 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 7 02:55:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 22:55:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205062] Review Request: perl-Sub-Install - Install subroutines into packages easily In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609070255.k872tHn9013775@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Sub-Install - Install subroutines into packages easily https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205062 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-09-06 22:55 EST ------- Some tests are skipped due to the lack of Test::Output; thanks for the note. I wonder if it would be possible to run all of the tests once the dependencies are in the repo. That would mean installing an older version of the module you're building, which would be odd but should technically be possible. Anyway, this package is fine: * source files match upstream: 48e8e9f72cdd5b3f5f7115b8b7de3ddf Sub-Install-0.922.tar.gz * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * dist tag is present. * build root is correct. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. License text not included upstream. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: perl(Sub::Install) = 0.922 perl-Sub-Install = 0.922-1.fc6 = perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8) perl(Carp) perl(Scalar::Util) perl(strict) perl(warnings) * %check is present and all tests pass: All tests successful, 2 subtests skipped. Files=11, Tests=67, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.36 cusr + 0.11 csys = 0.47 CPU) (two tests are skipped due to lack of Test::Output) * package is not relocatable. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 7 02:59:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 22:59:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205267] Review Request: perl-Package-Generator - Generate new packages quickly and easily In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609070259.k872xosE014102@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Package-Generator - Generate new packages quickly and easily https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205267 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 7 03:01:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 23:01:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193897] Review Request: mysql-connector-java - Official JDBC driver for MySQL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609070301.k8731VA0014264@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mysql-connector-java - Official JDBC driver for MySQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193897 ------- Additional Comments From ifoox at redhat.com 2006-09-06 23:01 EST ------- The package now builds for me in mock, I guess the problem with ant-contrib was some sort of mirror inconsistency. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 7 03:07:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 23:07:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205267] Review Request: perl-Package-Generator - Generate new packages quickly and easily In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609070307.k8737hF6014632@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Package-Generator - Generate new packages quickly and easily https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205267 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-09-06 23:07 EST ------- * source files match upstream: 201e8aec3f37b879bd01abd5ad22fe5e Package-Generator-0.100.tar.gz * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * dist tag is present. * build root is correct. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. License text not included upstream. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: perl(Package::Generator) = 0.100 perl(Package::Reaper) = 0.100 perl-Package-Generator = 0.100-1.fc6 = perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8) perl(Carp) perl(Scalar::Util) perl(strict) perl(warnings) * %check is present and all tests pass: All tests successful. Files=7, Tests=72, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.23 cusr + 0.12 csys = 0.35 CPU) * package is not relocatable. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 7 03:13:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 23:13:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205309] Review Request: perl-Algorithm-C3 - Module for merging hierarchies using the C3 algorithm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609070313.k873Dni7015042@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Algorithm-C3 - Module for merging hierarchies using the C3 algorithm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205309 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 7 03:18:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 23:18:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204525] Review Request: eclipse-gef - Eclipse Graphical Editing Framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609070318.k873IEfw015389@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-gef - Eclipse Graphical Editing Framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204525 green at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From green at redhat.com 2006-09-06 23:17 EST ------- (In reply to comment #8) > Updated spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/~overholt/eclipse-gef.spec > Updated SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/~overholt/eclipse-gef-3.2.0-2.fc6.src.rpm APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 7 03:28:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 23:28:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205032] Review Request: perl-Test-AutoBuild - a framework for continuous, unatttended software builds In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609070328.k873SX4i016223@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-AutoBuild - a framework for continuous, unatttended software builds https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205032 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776, 177841 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-09-06 23:28 EST ------- Removing FE-NEEDSPONSOR per bug 205029. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 7 03:29:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 23:29:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205032] Review Request: perl-Test-AutoBuild - a framework for continuous, unatttended software builds In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609070329.k873TlJv016376@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-AutoBuild - a framework for continuous, unatttended software builds https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205032 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |cweyl at alumni.drew.edu -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 7 03:51:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 23:51:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205309] Review Request: perl-Algorithm-C3 - Module for merging hierarchies using the C3 algorithm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609070351.k873pCCA018200@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Algorithm-C3 - Module for merging hierarchies using the C3 algorithm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205309 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-09-06 23:50 EST ------- Sorry to step into this conversation, but I have some time for reviews, so.... * source files match upstream: d087e68c937e7076bb07396b281685c1 Algorithm-C3-0.05.tar.gz * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * dist tag is present. * build root is correct. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. License text not included upstream. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: perl(Algorithm::C3) = 0.05 perl-Algorithm-C3 = 0.05-1.fc6 = perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8) perl(Carp) perl(strict) perl(warnings) * %check is present and all tests pass: All tests successful. Files=11, Tests=57, 1 wallclock secs ( 0.32 cusr + 0.14 csys = 0.46 CPU) * package is not relocatable. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 7 03:57:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 23:57:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197411] Review Request: php-pear-Date - PEAR: Date and Time Zone Classes In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609070357.k873vgbQ018435@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Date - PEAR: Date and Time Zone Classes Alias: php-pear-Date https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197411 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |tibbs at math.uh.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 7 04:47:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2006 00:47:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205309] Review Request: perl-Algorithm-C3 - Module for merging hierarchies using the C3 algorithm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609070447.k874lG0x019860@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Algorithm-C3 - Module for merging hierarchies using the C3 algorithm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205309 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-09-07 00:47 EST ------- +Import to CVS +Add to owners.list +Bump release, build for devel +devel build succeeds +Request branching (FC-5) +Close bug Thanks for the review! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 7 04:47:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2006 00:47:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205314] Review Request: perl-Class-C3 - Pragma to use the C3 method resolution order algorithm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609070447.k874lbOs019883@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Class-C3 - Pragma to use the C3 method resolution order algorithm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205314 Bug 205314 depends on bug 205309, which changed state. Bug 205309 Summary: Review Request: perl-Algorithm-C3 - Module for merging hierarchies using the C3 algorithm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205309 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 7 04:58:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2006 00:58:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197411] Review Request: php-pear-Date - PEAR: Date and Time Zone Classes In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609070458.k874whOQ020163@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Date - PEAR: Date and Time Zone Classes Alias: php-pear-Date https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197411 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-09-07 00:58 EST ------- rpmlint complains: W: php-pear-Date dangerous-command-in-%post install but this is obviously bogus. Hopefully rpmlint will eventually be fixed to stop complaining about this as going to show up in every pear package. There seems to be a test suite included in the tarball. Is it possible to call it? It looks like many of the tests need an external mopdule called PHPUnit.php and I don't know enough about PHP to get the paths set up properly. The test suite question is the only thing that keeps me from approving this. The spec itself and the template it came from are quite clean and should work great in practise. * source files match upstream: 9acd7e19d094877c6d26be1fbabe79cb Date-1.4.6.tgz * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * specfile follows the suggested PHP-Pear specfile template currently under development. * dist tag is present. * build root is correct. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. License text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * rpmlint has only bogus complaints. * final provides and requires are sane: php-pear(Date) = 1.4.6 php-pear-Date = 1.4.6-1.fc6 = /bin/sh /usr/bin/pear php-pear(PEAR) ? %check is not present, but there are some tests upstream. * package is not relocatable. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * scriptlets present are OK (PEAR module installation) * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 7 05:06:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2006 01:06:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205319] Review Request: perl-Params-Coerce - Allows your classes to do coercion of parameters In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609070506.k87562eP020436@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Params-Coerce - Allows your classes to do coercion of parameters https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205319 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 7 05:08:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2006 01:08:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205267] Review Request: perl-Package-Generator - Generate new packages quickly and easily In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609070508.k8758Ae7020507@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Package-Generator - Generate new packages quickly and easily https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205267 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-09-07 01:08 EST ------- +Import to CVS +Add to owners.list +Bump release, build for devel +devel build succeeds +Request branching (FC-5) +Close bug Thanks for the review! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 7 05:08:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2006 01:08:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205269] Review Request: perl-Sub-Exporter - Sophisticated exporter for custom-built routines In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609070508.k8758CIG020524@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Sub-Exporter - Sophisticated exporter for custom-built routines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205269 Bug 205269 depends on bug 205267, which changed state. Bug 205267 Summary: Review Request: perl-Package-Generator - Generate new packages quickly and easily https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205267 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 7 05:09:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2006 01:09:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205062] Review Request: perl-Sub-Install - Install subroutines into packages easily In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609070509.k8759vv2020574@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Sub-Install - Install subroutines into packages easily https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205062 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-09-07 01:09 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > Some tests are skipped due to the lack of Test::Output; thanks for the note. I > wonder if it would be possible to run all of the tests once the dependencies are > in the repo. That would mean installing an older version of the module you're > building, which would be odd but should technically be possible. I think it would be, but since there's no 'BuildRequiresIfItHappensToBeAround' tag for rpm I'd have to be very careful not to end up with a catch-22 of deps, eg.. Sub::Install won't build because it needs Test::Output which won't build because it needs Sub::Install which... etc. I'd need to build this package w/o the Test::Output dep, then build T::O, then insert T::O as a BR and rebuild this package. Hrm. +Import to CVS +Add to owners.list +Bump release, build for devel +devel build succeeds +Request branching (FC-5) +Close bug As always, thanks for the review :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 7 05:09:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2006 01:09:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205249] Review Request: perl-Data-OptList - Parse and validate simple name/value option pairs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609070509.k8759wEO020582@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Data-OptList - Parse and validate simple name/value option pairs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205249 Bug 205249 depends on bug 205062, which changed state. Bug 205062 Summary: Review Request: perl-Sub-Install - Install subroutines into packages easily https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205062 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 7 05:09:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2006 01:09:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205321] Review Request: perl-Moose - Complete modern object system for Perl 5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609070509.k8759vKe020578@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Moose - Complete modern object system for Perl 5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205321 Bug 205321 depends on bug 205062, which changed state. Bug 205062 Summary: Review Request: perl-Sub-Install - Install subroutines into packages easily https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205062 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 7 05:10:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2006 01:10:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205269] Review Request: perl-Sub-Exporter - Sophisticated exporter for custom-built routines In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609070510.k875AAJk020608@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Sub-Exporter - Sophisticated exporter for custom-built routines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205269 Bug 205269 depends on bug 205062, which changed state. Bug 205062 Summary: Review Request: perl-Sub-Install - Install subroutines into packages easily https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205062 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 7 05:25:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2006 01:25:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205319] Review Request: perl-Params-Coerce - Allows your classes to do coercion of parameters In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609070525.k875Prkf021014@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Params-Coerce - Allows your classes to do coercion of parameters https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205319 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-09-07 01:25 EST ------- I have to say that the %description leaves a bit to be desired. Could you perhaps add the second paragraph from the DESCRIPTION section of the documentation? * source files match upstream: b87babce7c8c5869045fff7d1fc9958f Params-Coerce-0.13.tar.gz * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * dist tag is present. * build root is correct. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. License text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * compiler flags are appropriate. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: perl(Params::Coerce) = 0.13 perl-Params-Coerce = 0.13-1.fc6 = perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8) perl(Carp) perl(Params::Util) perl(Scalar::Util) perl(strict) perl(vars) * %check is present and all tests pass: All tests successful. Files=5, Tests=48, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.16 cusr + 0.08 csys = 0.24 CPU) * package is not relocatable. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 7 05:30:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2006 01:30:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205032] Review Request: perl-Test-AutoBuild - a framework for continuous, unatttended software builds In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609070530.k875UNWJ021239@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-AutoBuild - a framework for continuous, unatttended software builds https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205032 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-09-07 01:30 EST ------- A couple guideline issues, and a ton of rpmlint messages. The rpmlint warnings/errors all look to be false positives, except for the ones against the src package. Those 4 need to be addressed. With respect to macros, it's important to remain consistent across the board. e.g., 'make' is used in one spot, and '%__make' in another; %__chmod is used for chmod but %__cp isn't used for cp. Everything either needs to be macroized or not. With the -svk subpackage, is there a reason to prefer the requires as coded to the perl-SVK package, rather than to the virtual perl(SVK)? With the -perforce subpackage, I was initially uncomfortable with it depending on software not in core/extras. However, there are no explicit rpm deps generated from it, and it's an optional subpackage that works iff perforce is installed (the way spamassassin uses razor or dcc if present, rhythmbox will play mp3's if the right packages are installed, etc, etc). While using the usermgmt tools is not required by the guidelines, a good case is made for it. This isn't a blocker, just a nudge :) http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageUserCreation http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageUserRegistry There also appears to be a docs/ directory that isn't packaged; it's only 44k, why not %doc it in the main package? For the %pre accounts scriptlet, I'm running into errors: [cweyl at zeus tmp]$ sudo rpm -ivh perl-Test-AutoBuild-account-1.2.0-1.fc5.noarch.rpm Preparing... ########################################### [100%] useradd: cannot create directory /var/lib/builder usermod: user builder does not exist error: %pre(perl-Test-AutoBuild-account-1.2.0-1.fc5.noarch) scriptlet failed, exit status 6 error: install: %pre scriptlet failed (2), skipping perl-Test-AutoBuild-account-1.2.0-1.fc5 There are also two tests that are skipped due to missing buildrequires: t/005-pod......................skipped all skipped: Test::Pod 1.00 required for testing POD t/010-pod-coverage.............skipped all skipped: Test::Pod::Coverage 1.00 required for testing POD coverage So, to recap: * address rpmlint messages on src.rpm * make macros consistent (either all %__ or none) * fix the %pre accounts scriptlet * add doc/ to %doc in the main package * add buildrequires on perl(Test::Pod::Coverage) and perl(Test::Pod) + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. X specfile is not properly named (needs to be perl-Test-AutoBuild.spec) X specfile is cleanly written but does not use macros consistently. + dist tag is present. X build root is not correct. should be: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) + license field matches the actual license. + license is open source-compatible. (GPL) License text included in package. + source files match upstream: 7c1d0e9aaa9f9b19b363f31963d5f240 Test-AutoBuild-1.2.0.tar.gz 7c1d0e9aaa9f9b19b363f31963d5f240 Test-AutoBuild-1.2.0.tar.gz.srpm + latest version is being packaged. X BuildRequires are proper. + package builds in mock (5/x86_64). X rpmlint is silent. (see below) final provides and requires are sane: ** perl-Test-AutoBuild-1.2.0-1.fc5.src.rpm == rpmlint W: perl-Test-AutoBuild strange-permission Test-AutoBuild.spec 0600 E: perl-Test-AutoBuild invalid-spec-name Test-AutoBuild.spec W: perl-Test-AutoBuild hardcoded-path-in-buildroot-tag /var/tmp/%{appname}-%{version}-root W: perl-Test-AutoBuild patch-not-applied Patch1: Test-AutoBuild-remove-yumarch.patch ** perl-Test-AutoBuild-1.2.0-1.fc5.noarch.rpm == rpmlint == provides config(perl-Test-AutoBuild) = 1.2.0-1.fc5 perl(Test::AutoBuild) = 1.2.0 perl(Test::AutoBuild::Archive) perl(Test::AutoBuild::Archive::File) perl(Test::AutoBuild::Archive::Memory) perl(Test::AutoBuild::ArchiveManager) perl(Test::AutoBuild::ArchiveManager::File) perl(Test::AutoBuild::ArchiveManager::Memory) perl(Test::AutoBuild::Change) perl(Test::AutoBuild::Counter) perl(Test::AutoBuild::Counter::ChangeList) perl(Test::AutoBuild::Counter::Time) perl(Test::AutoBuild::Counter::Timestamp) perl(Test::AutoBuild::ErrorReport) perl(Test::AutoBuild::Group) perl(Test::AutoBuild::Lib) perl(Test::AutoBuild::Lock) perl(Test::AutoBuild::Module) perl(Test::AutoBuild::Monitor) perl(Test::AutoBuild::Monitor::CommandLine) perl(Test::AutoBuild::Monitor::Log4perl) perl(Test::AutoBuild::Monitor::Pipe) perl(Test::AutoBuild::Package) perl(Test::AutoBuild::PackageType) perl(Test::AutoBuild::Platform) perl(Test::AutoBuild::Publisher) perl(Test::AutoBuild::Publisher::Copy) perl(Test::AutoBuild::Publisher::XSLTransform) perl(Test::AutoBuild::Repository) perl(Test::AutoBuild::Repository::Disk) perl(Test::AutoBuild::Result) perl(Test::AutoBuild::Runtime) = 1.1.0 perl(Test::AutoBuild::Stage) perl(Test::AutoBuild::Stage::Apt) perl(Test::AutoBuild::Stage::ArtifactCopier) perl(Test::AutoBuild::Stage::Build) perl(Test::AutoBuild::Stage::CleanArchive) perl(Test::AutoBuild::Stage::CleanBuildRoots) perl(Test::AutoBuild::Stage::CleanPackages) perl(Test::AutoBuild::Stage::Copier) perl(Test::AutoBuild::Stage::CreateArchive) perl(Test::AutoBuild::Stage::CreateRepo) perl(Test::AutoBuild::Stage::EmailAlert) perl(Test::AutoBuild::Stage::GetSource) perl(Test::AutoBuild::Stage::Group) perl(Test::AutoBuild::Stage::HTMLStatus) perl(Test::AutoBuild::Stage::ISOBuilder) perl(Test::AutoBuild::Stage::Iterator) perl(Test::AutoBuild::Stage::LogCopier) perl(Test::AutoBuild::Stage::PackageCopier) perl(Test::AutoBuild::Stage::SetNice) perl(Test::AutoBuild::Stage::TemplateGenerator) perl(Test::AutoBuild::Stage::Test) perl(Test::AutoBuild::Stage::Yum) perl-Test-AutoBuild = 1.2.0-1.fc5 == requires /bin/sh /usr/bin/createrepo /usr/bin/genbasedir /usr/bin/mkisofs /usr/bin/perl /usr/bin/xsltproc config(perl-Test-AutoBuild) = 1.2.0-1.fc5 perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8) perl(BSD::Resource) perl(Carp) perl(Class::MethodMaker) perl(Config) perl(Config::Record) perl(Cwd) perl(Data::Dumper) perl(Date::Manip) perl(Digest::MD5) perl(Fcntl) perl(File::Copy) perl(File::Find) perl(File::Glob) perl(File::Path) perl(File::Spec) perl(File::Spec::Functions) perl(File::Temp) perl(File::stat) perl(Getopt::Long) perl(IO::File) perl(IO::Scalar) perl(List::Util) perl(Log::Log4perl) perl(Net::SMTP) perl(POSIX) perl(Storable) perl(Sys::Hostname) perl(Template) perl(Test::AutoBuild) perl(Test::AutoBuild::Archive::File) perl(Test::AutoBuild::Archive::Memory) perl(Test::AutoBuild::ErrorReport) perl(Test::AutoBuild::Group) perl(Test::AutoBuild::Lib) perl(Test::AutoBuild::Package) perl(Test::AutoBuild::PackageType) perl(Test::AutoBuild::Platform) perl(Test::AutoBuild::Publisher) perl(Test::AutoBuild::Result) perl(Test::AutoBuild::Runtime) perl(Test::AutoBuild::Stage::Group) perl(UNIVERSAL) perl(base) perl(integer) perl(overload) perl(strict) perl(vars) perl(warnings) ** perl-Test-AutoBuild-account-1.2.0-1.fc5.noarch.rpm == rpmlint E: perl-Test-AutoBuild-account non-standard-uid /var/lib/builder/package-root/rpm/RPMS/x86_64 builder E: perl-Test-AutoBuild-account non-standard-gid /var/lib/builder/package-root/rpm/RPMS/x86_64 builder E: perl-Test-AutoBuild-account non-standard-uid /var/lib/builder/.cvspass builder E: perl-Test-AutoBuild-account non-standard-gid /var/lib/builder/.cvspass builder W: perl-Test-AutoBuild-account hidden-file-or-dir /var/lib/builder/.cvspass E: perl-Test-AutoBuild-account non-readable /var/lib/builder/.cvspass 0600 E: perl-Test-AutoBuild-account non-standard-uid /var/lib/builder/package-root/debian builder E: perl-Test-AutoBuild-account non-standard-gid /var/lib/builder/package-root/debian builder E: perl-Test-AutoBuild-account non-standard-uid /var/lib/builder builder E: perl-Test-AutoBuild-account non-standard-gid /var/lib/builder builder E: perl-Test-AutoBuild-account non-standard-uid /var/lib/builder/package-root builder E: perl-Test-AutoBuild-account non-standard-gid /var/lib/builder/package-root builder E: perl-Test-AutoBuild-account non-standard-uid /var/lib/builder/install-root builder E: perl-Test-AutoBuild-account non-standard-gid /var/lib/builder/install-root builder E: perl-Test-AutoBuild-account non-standard-uid /var/lib/builder/package-root/rpm/RPMS builder E: perl-Test-AutoBuild-account non-standard-gid /var/lib/builder/package-root/rpm/RPMS builder E: perl-Test-AutoBuild-account non-standard-uid /var/lib/builder/package-root/rpm builder E: perl-Test-AutoBuild-account non-standard-gid /var/lib/builder/package-root/rpm builder E: perl-Test-AutoBuild-account non-standard-uid /var/lib/builder/package-root/zips builder E: perl-Test-AutoBuild-account non-standard-gid /var/lib/builder/package-root/zips builder E: perl-Test-AutoBuild-account non-standard-uid /var/lib/builder/package-root/rpm/SRPMS builder E: perl-Test-AutoBuild-account non-standard-gid /var/lib/builder/package-root/rpm/SRPMS builder E: perl-Test-AutoBuild-account non-standard-uid /var/lib/builder/source-root builder E: perl-Test-AutoBuild-account non-standard-gid /var/lib/builder/source-root builder E: perl-Test-AutoBuild-account non-standard-uid /var/lib/builder/package-root/tars builder E: perl-Test-AutoBuild-account non-standard-gid /var/lib/builder/package-root/tars builder E: perl-Test-AutoBuild-account non-standard-uid /var/lib/builder/package-root/rpm/RPMS/i686 builder E: perl-Test-AutoBuild-account non-standard-gid /var/lib/builder/package-root/rpm/RPMS/i686 builder E: perl-Test-AutoBuild-account non-standard-uid /var/lib/builder/package-root/rpm/RPMS/ia32e builder E: perl-Test-AutoBuild-account non-standard-gid /var/lib/builder/package-root/rpm/RPMS/ia32e builder E: perl-Test-AutoBuild-account non-standard-uid /var/lib/builder/public_html builder E: perl-Test-AutoBuild-account non-standard-gid /var/lib/builder/public_html builder E: perl-Test-AutoBuild-account non-standard-uid /var/lib/builder/package-root/rpm/RPMS/ia64 builder E: perl-Test-AutoBuild-account non-standard-gid /var/lib/builder/package-root/rpm/RPMS/ia64 builder E: perl-Test-AutoBuild-account non-standard-uid /var/lib/builder/package-root/rpm/BUILD builder E: perl-Test-AutoBuild-account non-standard-gid /var/lib/builder/package-root/rpm/BUILD builder E: perl-Test-AutoBuild-account non-standard-uid /var/lib/builder/public_ftp builder E: perl-Test-AutoBuild-account non-standard-gid /var/lib/builder/public_ftp builder E: perl-Test-AutoBuild-account non-standard-uid /var/lib/builder/package-root/rpm/RPMS/sparc builder E: perl-Test-AutoBuild-account non-standard-gid /var/lib/builder/package-root/rpm/RPMS/sparc builder E: perl-Test-AutoBuild-account non-standard-uid /var/lib/builder/package-root/rpm/SPECS builder E: perl-Test-AutoBuild-account non-standard-gid /var/lib/builder/package-root/rpm/SPECS builder E: perl-Test-AutoBuild-account non-standard-uid /var/lib/builder/build-archive builder E: perl-Test-AutoBuild-account non-standard-gid /var/lib/builder/build-archive builder E: perl-Test-AutoBuild-account non-standard-uid /var/lib/builder/package-root/rpm/RPMS/noarch builder E: perl-Test-AutoBuild-account non-standard-gid /var/lib/builder/package-root/rpm/RPMS/noarch builder E: perl-Test-AutoBuild-account non-standard-uid /var/lib/builder/package-root/rpm/RPMS/i486 builder E: perl-Test-AutoBuild-account non-standard-gid /var/lib/builder/package-root/rpm/RPMS/i486 builder E: perl-Test-AutoBuild-account non-standard-uid /var/lib/builder/log-root builder E: perl-Test-AutoBuild-account non-standard-gid /var/lib/builder/log-root builder E: perl-Test-AutoBuild-account non-standard-uid /var/lib/builder/package-root/rpm/RPMS/i586 builder E: perl-Test-AutoBuild-account non-standard-gid /var/lib/builder/package-root/rpm/RPMS/i586 builder E: perl-Test-AutoBuild-account non-standard-uid /var/lib/builder/package-root/rpm/SOURCES builder E: perl-Test-AutoBuild-account non-standard-gid /var/lib/builder/package-root/rpm/SOURCES builder E: perl-Test-AutoBuild-account non-standard-uid /var/lib/builder/.rpmmacros builder E: perl-Test-AutoBuild-account non-standard-gid /var/lib/builder/.rpmmacros builder W: perl-Test-AutoBuild-account hidden-file-or-dir /var/lib/builder/.rpmmacros E: perl-Test-AutoBuild-account non-standard-uid /var/lib/builder/package-root/rpm/RPMS/i386 builder E: perl-Test-AutoBuild-account non-standard-gid /var/lib/builder/package-root/rpm/RPMS/i386 builder == provides config(perl-Test-AutoBuild-account) = 1.2.0-1.fc5 perl-Test-AutoBuild-account = 1.2.0-1.fc5 == requires /bin/sh config(perl-Test-AutoBuild-account) = 1.2.0-1.fc5 perl-Test-AutoBuild = 1.2.0-1.fc5 ** perl-Test-AutoBuild-cvs-1.2.0-1.fc5.noarch.rpm == rpmlint == provides perl(Test::AutoBuild::Repository::CVS) perl-Test-AutoBuild-cvs = 1.2.0-1.fc5 == requires cvs >= 1.11 perl(Log::Log4perl) perl(POSIX) perl(base) perl(strict) perl(warnings) perl-Test-AutoBuild = 1.2.0-1.fc5 ** perl-Test-AutoBuild-mercurial-1.2.0-1.fc5.noarch.rpm == rpmlint == provides perl(Test::AutoBuild::Repository::Mercurial) perl-Test-AutoBuild-mercurial = 1.2.0-1.fc5 == requires mercurial >= 0.7 perl(Date::Manip) perl(Log::Log4perl) perl(Test::AutoBuild::Change) perl(base) perl(strict) perl(warnings) perl-Test-AutoBuild = 1.2.0-1.fc5 ** perl-Test-AutoBuild-perforce-1.2.0-1.fc5.noarch.rpm == rpmlint == provides perl(Test::AutoBuild::Repository::Perforce) perl-Test-AutoBuild-perforce = 1.2.0-1.fc5 == requires perl(Date::Manip) perl(File::Spec::Functions) perl(Log::Log4perl) perl(POSIX) perl(Test::AutoBuild::Change) perl(base) perl(strict) perl-Test-AutoBuild = 1.2.0-1.fc5 ** perl-Test-AutoBuild-subversion-1.2.0-1.fc5.noarch.rpm == rpmlint == provides perl(Test::AutoBuild::Repository::Subversion) perl-Test-AutoBuild-subversion = 1.2.0-1.fc5 == requires perl(Date::Manip) perl(Log::Log4perl) perl(POSIX) perl(Test::AutoBuild::Change) perl(base) perl(strict) perl-Test-AutoBuild = 1.2.0-1.fc5 subversion >= 1.0.0 ** perl-Test-AutoBuild-svk-1.2.0-1.fc5.noarch.rpm == rpmlint == provides perl(Test::AutoBuild::Repository::SVK) perl-Test-AutoBuild-svk = 1.2.0-1.fc5 == requires perl(Carp) perl(base) perl(strict) perl-SVK >= 1.0 perl-Test-AutoBuild = 1.2.0-1.fc5 ** perl-Test-AutoBuild-tla-1.2.0-1.fc5.noarch.rpm == rpmlint == provides perl(Test::AutoBuild::Repository::GNUArch) perl-Test-AutoBuild-tla = 1.2.0-1.fc5 == requires perl(Carp) perl(Date::Manip) perl(Log::Log4perl) perl(Test::AutoBuild::Change) perl(base) perl(strict) perl-Test-AutoBuild = 1.2.0-1.fc5 tla >= 1.1.0 + no shared libraries are present. + package is not relocatable. X owns the directories it creates. main package missing: /etc/auto-build.d/ /etc/auto-build.d/engine/ ..etc %{perl_vendorlib}/Test/ %{perl_vendorlib}/Test/AutoBuild/ %{perl_vendorlib}/Test/AutoBuild/Repository/ ...etc + doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + %clean is present. + %check is present and all tests pass (skips were expected): All tests successful, 1 test and 36 subtests skipped. Files=47, Tests=814, 43 wallclock secs (11.99 cusr + 5.49 csys = 17.48 CPU) X sane scriptlets present. + code, not content. + documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. + %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. + no headers. + no pkgconfig files. + no libtool .la droppings. + not a GUI app. + not a web app. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 7 05:37:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2006 01:37:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205343] Review Request: cohoba - Cohoba is a GNOME interface for Telepathy. It aims to be innovative and simple In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609070537.k875b3Gu021564@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cohoba - Cohoba is a GNOME interface for Telepathy. It aims to be innovative and simple https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205343 ------- Additional Comments From sander at hoentjen.eu 2006-09-07 01:37 EST ------- from the README: ------- Now you can either install it on your system: sudo make install (or run make install as root) Then you are able to add the applet through the gnome-panel applet manager. Or you can try it without installation, by running ./cohoba/cohoba -w ------- So it is meant to add to the panel, and from there you can open different windows. If you open it with cohoba -w the applet you normally have will be a small window that will have the same icon and behave the same as the applet would, so I could create a desktop file for that. Not sure if I should. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 7 06:05:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2006 02:05:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197411] Review Request: php-pear-Date - PEAR: Date and Time Zone Classes In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609070605.k8765u5t022562@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Date - PEAR: Date and Time Zone Classes Alias: php-pear-Date https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197411 ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2006-09-07 02:05 EST ------- The rpmlint warning is mentioned here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198705 pear has no way to do a make check. It does include the test files in the rpm however. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 7 06:31:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2006 02:31:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199108] Review Request: gutenprint: Printer Drivers Package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609070631.k876Vr0H023637@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gutenprint: Printer Drivers Package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199108 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-09-07 02:31 EST ------- Here is updated package but still mock build is really failing now. previous releases it was not the case. If i manually build rpm using rpmbuild -ba gutenprint.spec then its executing gimp2 dir and installing /usr/lib/gimp/2.0/plug-ins/print file, but same will not be happening in mock. That means i am missing some BR. I confused becuase i have already added all BRs. Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/pnemade/gutenprint/gutenprint.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/pnemade/gutenprint/gutenprint-5.0.0-0.9.fc6.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 7 07:12:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2006 03:12:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205249] Review Request: perl-Data-OptList - Parse and validate simple name/value option pairs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609070712.k877C9F0025073@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Data-OptList - Parse and validate simple name/value option pairs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205249 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |pertusus at free.fr OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-09-07 03:12 EST ------- * rpmlint is silent * package named according to guidelines * free software, without licence files included * meets packaging guidelines * spec legible * source match upstream 6e9bb994a8716112a78c1306261f4164 Data-OptList-0.101.tar.gz * sane provides Provides: perl(Data::OptList) = 0.101 * %files right APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 7 07:36:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2006 03:36:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205306] Review Request: perl-SUPER - Control superclass method dispatch In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609070736.k877aGil026458@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-SUPER - Control superclass method dispatch https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205306 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |pertusus at free.fr OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-09-07 03:36 EST ------- The description ends with a :, this is certainly wrong... perl(DB) should certainly filtered out. It may be relevant to Requires: perl(DB) perl(UNIVERSAL) even if they are in perl core, maybe with a explanatory comment. Otherwise * rpmlint ignorable: W: perl-SUPER strange-permission filter-provides.sh 0755 * package named according to guidelines * free software, without licence files included * meets packaging guidelines * spec legible * source match upstream 591389c353df308ee9e70d38f0e3570b SUPER-1.14.tar.gz X insane provides Provides: perl(DB) perl(SUPER) = 1.14 * %files right -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 7 07:57:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2006 03:57:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205314] Review Request: perl-Class-C3 - Pragma to use the C3 method resolution order algorithm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609070757.k877v08c027859@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Class-C3 - Pragma to use the C3 method resolution order algorithm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205314 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |pertusus at free.fr OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-09-07 03:56 EST ------- There is a missing BuildRequires perl(Sub::Name) for a test t/33_next_method_used_with_NEXT.t. And also certainly perl(UNIVERSAL::can) for t/01_MRO.t and t/30_next_method.t There is also a rpmlint warning which is certainly right: E: perl-Class-C3 description-line-too-long This is a pragma to change Perl 5's standard method resolution order from depth- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 7 08:20:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2006 04:20:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204832] Review Request: wxMaxima - wxWidgets interface for maxima In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609070820.k878KeIv029835@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wxMaxima - wxWidgets interface for maxima https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204832 gemi at bluewin.ch changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |gemi at bluewin.ch OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163779 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 7 08:33:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2006 04:33:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199108] Review Request: gutenprint: Printer Drivers Package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609070833.k878XaS9030770@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gutenprint: Printer Drivers Package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199108 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-09-07 04:33 EST ------- Got it. I need to add gimp as BR instread to make it as Requires : gimp Updated package Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/pnemade/gutenprint/gutenprint.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/pnemade/gutenprint/gutenprint-5.0.0-0.10.fc6.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 7 09:40:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2006 05:40:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187294] Review Request: gwyddion In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609070940.k879eagS002766@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gwyddion https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187294 ------- Additional Comments From yeti at physics.muni.cz 2006-09-07 05:40 EST ------- New upstream version is available, so I repackaged the src.rpm, there are no other changes: Spec URI: http://gwyddion.net/download/test/gwyddion.spec SRPM URI: http://gwyddion.net/download/test/gwyddion-1.99.9-1.src.rpm * Thu Sep 07 2006 David Necas (Yeti) - 1.99.9-1 - rebuilt with upstream 1.99.9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 7 10:22:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2006 06:22:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203520] Review Request: evolution-brutus In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609071022.k87AMjFD004839@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: evolution-brutus Alias: evolution-brutus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203520 ------- Additional Comments From colding at omesc.com 2006-09-07 06:22 EST ------- (In reply to comment #18) > Just a quick check of 1.1.6-5. > > * Well, this package does not aimed for FC5 at all? It is. I have rpms for FC6, FC5 as well as FC4 on the site below. > This package > can be rebuilt in mock under 20060906 rawhide, however this package > cannot be rebuilt under FC5 (with 20060906 updates) with following error: This has been fixed in the new SRPM. > No Package Found for evolution-data-server-devel >= 1.8 Mea culpa. I generated the required e-d-s version during configure from the version present in the build requirement. This is obviously wrong since a "make dist" package generated on, say, FC6, then can't build on FC4 or FC5 as they have different versions of e-d-s installed. This has been fixed. > No Package Found for ORBit2-devel >= 2.14.1 This is correct. evolution-brutus requires at least ORBit2 2.14.1 due to a handfull of fixes and features that aren't present in earlier versions. Please grep for my name in the ORBit2 and libIDL ChangeLogs for the details. FC4 and FC5 RPMs for the required versions of ORBit2 and libIDL are available in the FC4 and FC5 directories respectively here: http://www.omesc.com/content/downloads/dist/ > > * rpmlint for FC6-devel-built rpms complaints: > W: evolution-brutus macro-in-%changelog makeinstall Fixed in the new package. > * Why does this package use Autoreq: no ? > This description forbids finding libraries requirements, which I think > is quite unwilling. Even if you want to specify version-related > requirements, "Autoreq: no" is unnecessary because you can simply add > the requirements in addition to auto-finding requirements. Please believe me when I say that I didn't do this lightly. The thing that forced me to disable Autoreg is that at least one of the libraries (libebook if I rememver correctly) that are provided internally by e-d-s changed version from one stable release to another. I observed that when I: 1) Installed evolution-brutus for testing 2) Un-installed evolution-brutus 3) did "yum update" 4) Attempted to install evolution-brutus once more. This was now not possible due to Autoreq finding that one of the internal e-d-s libraries had changed version. The only way that I could fix this (please correct me if I'm wrong) was to disable Autoreq. Well, new packages with all fixes: Spec URL: http://www.omesc.com/content/downloads/dist/Fedora%20Core%206/SPECS/evolution-brutus.spec SRPM URL: http://www.omesc.com/content/downloads/dist/Fedora%20Core%206/SRPMS/evolution-brutus-1.1.6-6.src.rpm Thanks, jules -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 7 10:38:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2006 06:38:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205309] Review Request: perl-Algorithm-C3 - Module for merging hierarchies using the C3 algorithm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609071038.k87AcUrK005512@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Algorithm-C3 - Module for merging hierarchies using the C3 algorithm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205309 paul at city-fan.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |paul at city-fan.org ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-09-07 06:38 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > (In reply to comment #4) > > Thanks for the most excellent summary, Jose :) Would you mind if I posted that > > on the wiki somewhere? > > Not at all! Go ahead. The Packaging/Perl page would have been the obvious place but it's immutable to everyone outside the packaging committee now. > One other thing that I should be placing in the wiki is this rather outdated > document http://gsd.di.uminho.pt/jpo/perl/specfiles/. Do you know a good tool > to convert HTML pages into wiki formats? I'll volunteer to transcribe it if you like. Might be better to update it and/or strip out the outdated bits first though. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 7 11:05:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2006 07:05:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203520] Review Request: evolution-brutus In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609071105.k87B5Tak007061@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: evolution-brutus Alias: evolution-brutus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203520 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-09-07 07:05 EST ------- (In reply to comment #19) > > * Why does this package use Autoreq: no ? > > This description forbids finding libraries requirements, which I think > > is quite unwilling. Even if you want to specify version-related > > requirements, "Autoreq: no" is unnecessary because you can simply add > > the requirements in addition to auto-finding requirements. > > Please believe me when I say that I didn't do this lightly. The thing that > forced me to disable Autoreg is that at least one of the libraries (libebook if > I rememver correctly) that are provided internally by e-d-s changed version from > one stable release to another. I observed that when I: > > 1) Installed evolution-brutus for testing > 2) Un-installed evolution-brutus > 3) did "yum update" > 4) Attempted to install evolution-brutus once more. This was now not possible > due to Autoreq finding that one of the internal e-d-s libraries had changed > version. > > The only way that I could fix this (please correct me if I'm wrong) was to > disable Autoreq. This sounds to me like a regular shared library update that would require this package to be rebuilt against the updated e-d-s? What's different here that makes this not the case? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 7 11:17:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2006 07:17:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187294] Review Request: gwyddion In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609071117.k87BH3KE007796@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gwyddion https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187294 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-09-07 07:17 EST ------- i am not a sponsor, so I cannot approve the package but I have some comments: gwyddion-devel shouldn't own %{_libdir}/pkgconfig, but instead Requires: pkgconfig The shebangs removal seems to be done now, so the following is certainly not relevant anymore (as said in the comment ;-): # Remove shbangs from modules (upstream 1.99.8 will fix that) sed -i '1s/^#!.*//' ruby/gwyddion/dump.rb python/Gwyddion/dump.py For the desktop file you should have a look at: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-254ddf07aae20a23ced8cecc219d8f73926e9755 There is something very strange, an include file below %_libdir: /usr/lib/gwyddion/include/gwyconfig.h I guess it is there because it is a generated include file so it could include some platform-dependant informations... I have seen that other libraries do the same, so I guess it is ok. There is a missing Requires on ruby and python in -devel (I would have guessed that they were autodetected, but that's not the case???). However, the plugins should certainly be in a separate subpackage, called maybe gwyddion-plugin-examples, together with all the internal ruby/perl/python modules. Another benefit of doing a subpackage is that this subpackage could have only code in the public domain (as it seems to me, but I haven't checked everything) and could have a a licence marked as such. These perl/ruby/python modules should certainly be in a platform independent location (I would chose %{pkgdatadir}). Since the perl module is an internal module, the man page should certainly not be shipped, and the automatically determined Provides perl(Gwyddion::dump) should not be present Removing the provides may be achieved by %define __perl_provides %{nil} Wouldn't it be better if the perl/python/ruby modules where real modules? I am not convinced that the -devel package should require the base package, if plugin examples are removed. but it should certainly require the libs package, so I propose changing Requires: %{name} = %{version} to Requires: %{name}-libs = %{version}-%{release} The %post/%postun should be for the libs subpackage and not the main package. There are %post scriptlets missing for mime handling, you should have a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets?action=show&redirect=ScriptletSnippets#head-de6770dd9867fcd085a73a4700f6bcd0d10294ef and http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets?action=show&redirect=ScriptletSnippets#head-5f93ed83c968bb73b052c06ba0d7139e28f35d93 Otherwise it built and run on a Fc devel i386. If I'm not wrong you are the upstream for this project, maybe you could supply an example data file gwyddion can handle for potential users to test. Poking around in the source files, I have seen something that looks like a file for vim, if you feel like it you can make another subpackage for that file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 7 11:21:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2006 07:21:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203520] Review Request: evolution-brutus In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609071121.k87BLD49007992@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: evolution-brutus Alias: evolution-brutus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203520 ------- Additional Comments From colding at omesc.com 2006-09-07 07:21 EST ------- (In reply to comment #20) > (In reply to comment #19) > > > * Why does this package use Autoreq: no ? > > > This description forbids finding libraries requirements, which I think > > > is quite unwilling. Even if you want to specify version-related > > > requirements, "Autoreq: no" is unnecessary because you can simply add > > > the requirements in addition to auto-finding requirements. > > > > Please believe me when I say that I didn't do this lightly. The thing that > > forced me to disable Autoreg is that at least one of the libraries (libebook if > > I rememver correctly) that are provided internally by e-d-s changed version from > > one stable release to another. I observed that when I: > > > > 1) Installed evolution-brutus for testing > > 2) Un-installed evolution-brutus > > 3) did "yum update" > > 4) Attempted to install evolution-brutus once more. This was now not possible > > due to Autoreq finding that one of the internal e-d-s libraries had changed > > version. > > > > The only way that I could fix this (please correct me if I'm wrong) was to > > disable Autoreq. > > This sounds to me like a regular shared library update that would require this > package to be rebuilt against the updated e-d-s? What's different here that > makes this not the case? That is surely one way to fix it. My gripe with this is that perfectly fine RPMs that installed with, say, eds-1.4.1 won't install with eds-1.4.1 due to the changed version of some internal library in eds. I wouldn't mind to just rebuild the RPMs if the library in question had API changes, but API changes in a stable eds release serie should'nt happen, right? Anyway, I won't mind one bit to re-enable Autoreq if that is the right thing to do. Thoughts? jules -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 7 11:24:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2006 07:24:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203520] Review Request: evolution-brutus In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609071124.k87BOWLa008203@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: evolution-brutus Alias: evolution-brutus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203520 ------- Additional Comments From colding at omesc.com 2006-09-07 07:24 EST ------- (In reply to comment #21) > that installed with, say, eds-1.4.1 won't install with eds-1.4.1 due to the ^^^^^^^^^ "eds-1.4.2" not "eds-1.4.1". sorry, jules -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 7 11:50:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2006 07:50:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205537] Review Request: perl-Test-Object - Thoroughly testing objects via registered handlers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609071150.k87BoeSp009579@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-Object - Thoroughly testing objects via registered handlers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205537 rc040203 at freenet.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |rc040203 at freenet.de OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2006-09-07 07:50 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > Notes to reviewer(s): > > * The requirement 'Test::Builder' => '0.62' is wrong. > I believe the author wanted the version to be 0.32 > (the module version included in perl 5.8.8). I am inclined to agree, but I'd patch Makefile.PL and BR: perl(Test::Builder) >= 0.32, to make this discrepancy apparent. Anyway, decision left to you ... APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 7 12:18:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2006 08:18:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202356] Review Request: terminus-font - Clean fixed width font In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609071218.k87CIQqu010823@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: terminus-font - Clean fixed width font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202356 rhbugs at n-dimensional.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |CURRENTRELEASE Fixed In Version| |4.20-5.fc5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 7 12:31:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2006 08:31:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193897] Review Request: mysql-connector-java - Official JDBC driver for MySQL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609071231.k87CVfLa011371@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mysql-connector-java - Official JDBC driver for MySQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193897 ------- Additional Comments From green at redhat.com 2006-09-07 08:30 EST ------- (In reply to comment #11) > The package now builds for me in mock, I guess the problem with ant-contrib was > some sort of mirror inconsistency. Awesome. This builds in mock and is almost perfect. I think there are just two minor changes. 1. I gave you bad advice on using "Development/Libraries". This should be "System Environment/Libraries". Sorry about that! 2. In the spec file you wrote: # ************ NOTE ************ # The following files have been removed from the tarball since they are # distributed under the LGPL and the upstream provider does not distribute # any sources with them. Not all of these files are LGPL. I forget which one(s) it was. Just say something like... # The following files have been removed from the tarball to avoid licensing # issues. Did you find out about the Provides: mm.mysql Obsoletes: mm.mysql ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 7 12:58:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2006 08:58:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177105] Review Request: gnomeradio - Graphical FM-Tuner program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609071258.k87Cw7ma013571@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnomeradio - Graphical FM-Tuner program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177105 ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2006-09-07 08:57 EST ------- I don't think it is appropriate for this package to own /usr/share/omf. Maybe scrollkeeper should own it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 7 13:08:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2006 09:08:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187294] Review Request: gwyddion In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609071308.k87D8JmO014250@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gwyddion https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187294 ------- Additional Comments From yeti at physics.muni.cz 2006-09-07 09:08 EST ------- (still working on the technical points) (In reply to comment #13) > If I'm not wrong you are the upstream for this project, > maybe you could supply an example data file gwyddion can > handle for potential users to test. I am indeed upstream. If you mean to supply in the package, I don't think it's a good idea (they tend to be large, interested people tend to have lots of SPM files themselves, and one can just import a PNG, JPEG, TIFF, ..., as a [bogus] heightfield to play with the tools). If you mean it generally, a handful of sample files is available on the web: http://gwyddion.net/download.php#sample-files -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 7 13:31:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2006 09:31:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205537] Review Request: perl-Test-Object - Thoroughly testing objects via registered handlers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609071331.k87DVoBd015471@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-Object - Thoroughly testing objects via registered handlers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205537 ------- Additional Comments From jpo at di.uminho.pt 2006-09-07 09:31 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > (In reply to comment #1) > > Notes to reviewer(s): > > > > * The requirement 'Test::Builder' => '0.62' is wrong. > > I believe the author wanted the version to be 0.32 > > (the module version included in perl 5.8.8). > I am inclined to agree, but I'd patch Makefile.PL and > BR: perl(Test::Builder) >= 0.32, to make this discrepancy apparent. > > Anyway, decision left to you ... I will patch the Makefile.PL. > APPROVED Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 7 13:32:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2006 09:32:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205127] Review Request: ekg - A client compatible with Gadu-Gadu In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609071332.k87DWYMu015562@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ekg - A client compatible with Gadu-Gadu https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205127 rpm at greysector.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2006-09-07 09:32 EST ------- Imported and built for devel. FC-5 branch requested. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 7 13:32:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2006 09:32:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205136] Review Request: gg2 - GNU Gadu 2 - free talking In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609071332.k87DWkvF015601@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gg2 - GNU Gadu 2 - free talking https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205136 Bug 205136 depends on bug 205127, which changed state. Bug 205127 Summary: Review Request: ekg - A client compatible with Gadu-Gadu https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205127 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 7 13:32:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2006 09:32:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200436] Review Request: gaim-gadugadu - Gadu-Gadu support in Gaim IM client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609071332.k87DWvvO015636@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gaim-gadugadu - Gadu-Gadu support in Gaim IM client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200436 Bug 200436 depends on bug 205127, which changed state. Bug 205127 Summary: Review Request: ekg - A client compatible with Gadu-Gadu https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205127 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 7 13:51:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2006 09:51:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205537] Review Request: perl-Test-Object - Thoroughly testing objects via registered handlers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609071351.k87Dpgf6017586@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-Object - Thoroughly testing objects via registered handlers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205537 ------- Additional Comments From jpo at di.uminho.pt 2006-09-07 09:51 EST ------- The author has released version 0.07 a few hours ago with perl(Test::Builder) >= 0.33 as the build requirement. I will open a new RT ticket about it (trying to have the version changed to 0.32). Meanwhile I import and patch Test::Object 0.07 (I will delay branching until a hear from upstream). References: * Diff from Test-Object-0.06 to Test-Object-0.07 http://search.cpan.org/diff?from=Test-Object-0.06&to=Test-Object-0.07 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 7 14:03:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2006 10:03:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205029] Review Request: autobuild-applet - a GNOME applet for monitoring Test-AutoBuild build status In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609071403.k87E3h3n018529@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: autobuild-applet - a GNOME applet for monitoring Test-AutoBuild build status https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205029 ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at ameritech.net 2006-09-07 10:03 EST ------- Has this been built yet? If so, this bug can be closed. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/Contributors#head-6b9db491a77039613eb0ba70b30fedb4b73eb7b9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 7 15:19:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2006 11:19:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200937] Review Request: FreqTweak, realtime audio spectral manipulation (& Jack client) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609071519.k87FJQWl024839@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: FreqTweak, realtime audio spectral manipulation (& Jack client) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200937 green at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(nando at ccrma.stanfo | |rd.edu) ------- Additional Comments From green at redhat.com 2006-09-07 11:19 EST ------- Hi. I went through the checklist quickly. I think the two remaining issues are: rpmlint is not silent: W: freqtweak strange-permission freqtweak-0.6.1.tar.gz 0600 W: freqtweak mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs W: freqtweak patch-not-applied Patch1: freqtweak-0.6.1-addnoise.patch These should be easy to clean up. For the spaces/tabs thing, I just use the untabify command in emacs. As for the patch, is it supposed to be applied? We should special case builds for <=fc4 systems and have defaults for fc5 and greater. The current SRPM builds on fc5, but not fc6 because of the special tests for fc5. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 7 15:57:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2006 11:57:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193897] Review Request: mysql-connector-java - Official JDBC driver for MySQL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609071557.k87Fv5Dc027571@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mysql-connector-java - Official JDBC driver for MySQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193897 ------- Additional Comments From ifoox at redhat.com 2006-09-07 11:56 EST ------- New files: http://people.redhat.com/ifoox/extras/mysql-connector-java-3.1.12-1jpp_4fc.i386.rpm (In reply to comment #12) > (In reply to comment #11) > > The package now builds for me in mock, I guess the problem with ant-contrib was > > some sort of mirror inconsistency. > > Awesome. This builds in mock and is almost perfect. > > I think there are just two minor changes. > > 1. I gave you bad advice on using "Development/Libraries". This should be > "System Environment/Libraries". Sorry about that! Fixed > 2. In the spec file you wrote: > # ************ NOTE ************ > # The following files have been removed from the tarball since they are > # distributed under the LGPL and the upstream provider does not distribute > # any sources with them. > Not all of these files are LGPL. I forget which one(s) it was. Just say > something like... > # The following files have been removed from the tarball to avoid licensing > # issues. Fixed. Changed to: # The following files have been removed from the tarball to avoid licensing # issues due to the fact that they are not distributed with their source. > Did you find out about the > Provides: mm.mysql > Obsoletes: mm.mysql > ? See comment #4 (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193897#c4) above. I also formatted the preamble section so it doesn't look like a puzzle anymore :-). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 7 16:06:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2006 12:06:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205309] Review Request: perl-Algorithm-C3 - Module for merging hierarchies using the C3 algorithm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609071606.k87G6Zst028244@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Algorithm-C3 - Module for merging hierarchies using the C3 algorithm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205309 ------- Additional Comments From jpo at di.uminho.pt 2006-09-07 12:06 EST ------- (In reply to comment #8) > (In reply to comment #5) > > (In reply to comment #4) > > > Thanks for the most excellent summary, Jose :) Would you mind if I posted that > > > on the wiki somewhere? > > > > Not at all! Go ahead. > > The Packaging/Perl page would have been the obvious place but it's immutable to > everyone outside the packaging committee now. And at least a member of the packaging committee :( > > > One other thing that I should be placing in the wiki is this rather outdated > > document http://gsd.di.uminho.pt/jpo/perl/specfiles/. Do you know a good tool > > to convert HTML pages into wiki formats? > > I'll volunteer to transcribe it if you like. Might be better to update it and/or > strip out the outdated bits first though. Thanks! That would be great. I will start updating it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 7 16:07:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2006 12:07:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 181035] Review Request: luks-tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609071607.k87G7BFp028337@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: luks-tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=181035 ------- Additional Comments From Jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2006-09-07 12:06 EST ------- Good: + Source match with upstream. + Mock build works fine. Bad: - Rpmlint complaints luks-tools W: luks-tools non-executable-in-bin /usr/bin/gnome-luks-format.pyo 0644 W: luks-tools non-executable-in-bin /usr/bin/gnome-luks-format.pyc 0644 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 7 16:31:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2006 12:31:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193897] Review Request: mysql-connector-java - Official JDBC driver for MySQL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609071631.k87GVKip029810@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mysql-connector-java - Official JDBC driver for MySQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193897 ------- Additional Comments From green at redhat.com 2006-09-07 12:30 EST ------- (In reply to comment #13) > New files: > http://people.redhat.com/ifoox/extras/mysql-connector-java-3.1.12-1jpp_4fc.i386.rpm Where is the SRPM? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 7 16:31:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2006 12:31:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205249] Review Request: perl-Data-OptList - Parse and validate simple name/value option pairs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609071631.k87GVdPc029837@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Data-OptList - Parse and validate simple name/value option pairs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205249 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-09-07 12:31 EST ------- +Import to CVS +Add to owners.list +Bump release, build for devel +Request branching (FC-5) +Close bug Thanks for the review! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 7 16:31:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2006 12:31:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205269] Review Request: perl-Sub-Exporter - Sophisticated exporter for custom-built routines In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609071631.k87GVoFu029879@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Sub-Exporter - Sophisticated exporter for custom-built routines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205269 Bug 205269 depends on bug 205249, which changed state. Bug 205249 Summary: Review Request: perl-Data-OptList - Parse and validate simple name/value option pairs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205249 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 7 16:42:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2006 12:42:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205319] Review Request: perl-Params-Coerce - Allows your classes to do coercion of parameters In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609071642.k87Ggf8E030486@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Params-Coerce - Allows your classes to do coercion of parameters https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205319 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-09-07 12:42 EST ------- +Import to CVS +Add to owners.list +Bump release, build for devel +Request branching (FC-5) +Close bug (In reply to comment #1) > I have to say that the %description leaves a bit to be desired. Could you > perhaps add the second paragraph from the DESCRIPTION section of the documentation? Added. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 7 16:42:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2006 12:42:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205321] Review Request: perl-Moose - Complete modern object system for Perl 5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609071642.k87GggA1030490@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Moose - Complete modern object system for Perl 5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205321 Bug 205321 depends on bug 205319, which changed state. Bug 205319 Summary: Review Request: perl-Params-Coerce - Allows your classes to do coercion of parameters https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205319 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 7 17:03:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2006 13:03:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197411] Review Request: php-pear-Date - PEAR: Date and Time Zone Classes In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609071703.k87H35PJ031941@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Date - PEAR: Date and Time Zone Classes Alias: php-pear-Date https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197411 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-09-07 13:02 EST ------- Hmm. It doesn't have a "make check" but there must be some way to run the tests. Also, I don't see the point of packaging the tests. Are they somehow useful to the installed module? However, for some reason some Python modules do the same thing, and it seems to be accepted, so I don't suppose it's a blocker. So, APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 7 17:04:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2006 13:04:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190101] Review Request: php-pear-Log In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609071704.k87H4eex032069@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Log Alias: php-pear-Log https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190101 ------- Additional Comments From Fedora at FamilleCollet.com 2006-09-07 13:04 EST ------- SPEC : http://remi.collet.free.fr/rpms/extras/php-pear-Log.spec SRPM : http://remi.collet.free.fr/rpms/extras/php-pear-Log-1.9.8-4.fc5.src.rpm Mock : http://remi.collet.free.fr/rpms/extras/php-pear-Log-build.log Note : - i didn't use %{ClassName} as it's very useful on a template but not on a "generated" specfile. - i didn't check for package.xml/package2.xml as auto-generation knows which one use - i create docdir in the main build directory (cleaner, i think) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 7 17:16:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2006 13:16:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205620] New: FC: Package Review Request: buildos Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205620 Summary: FC: Package Review Request: buildos Product: Fedora Core Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: jkeating at redhat.com ReportedBy: prarit at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com The buildos RPM is a script I wrote a while back as a wrapper to anaconda to quickly build new OS distros. The script executes the createrepo and the buildinstall commands, as well as building a DVD or CD distribution. buildos SRPM attached. ------- Additional Comments From prarit at redhat.com 2006-09-07 13:16 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=135789) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=135789&action=view) buildos SRPM -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 7 17:17:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2006 13:17:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205617] FC: add buildos RPM to Fedora Core In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609071717.k87HHMJN000644@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: FC: add buildos RPM to Fedora Core https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205617 prarit at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |205620 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 7 17:18:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2006 13:18:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205620] FC: Package Review Request: buildos In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609071718.k87HIlIQ000725@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: FC: Package Review Request: buildos https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205620 ------- Additional Comments From prarit at redhat.com 2006-09-07 13:18 EST ------- I tested this out on ppc, ppc64, i386, i686, x86_64, and ia64 arches. P. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 7 17:27:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2006 13:27:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205620] FC: Package Review Request: buildos In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609071727.k87HRqxJ001383@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: FC: Package Review Request: buildos https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205620 ------- Additional Comments From notting at redhat.com 2006-09-07 13:27 EST ------- *** Bug 205617 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 7 17:40:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2006 13:40:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205620] FC: Package Review Request: buildos In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609071740.k87HekNr002185@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: FC: Package Review Request: buildos https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205620 ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-09-07 13:40 EST ------- I'd rather see this in Extras space, and if you go the extras route, you can get it available for FC6. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 7 17:46:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2006 13:46:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205620] Fedora Extras: Package Review Request: buildos In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609071746.k87HkLWU002502@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Fedora Extras: Package Review Request: buildos https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205620 prarit at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|FC: Package Review Request: |Fedora Extras: Package |buildos |Review Request: buildos Product|Fedora Core |Fedora Extras Component|Package Review |Package Review -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 7 17:48:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2006 13:48:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193897] Review Request: mysql-connector-java - Official JDBC driver for MySQL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609071748.k87HmaUK002720@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mysql-connector-java - Official JDBC driver for MySQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193897 ------- Additional Comments From ifoox at redhat.com 2006-09-07 13:48 EST ------- reply to comment #14) > Where is the SRPM? Oops, wrong file uploaded. http://people.redhat.com/ifoox/extras/mysql-connector-java-3.1.12-1jpp_4fc.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 7 18:24:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2006 14:24:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190101] Review Request: php-pear-Log In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609071824.k87IOiHo005550@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Log Alias: php-pear-Log https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190101 ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2006-09-07 14:24 EST ------- Looking good, please change: - Summary should not have "PEAR", a summary should be as short as possible while still being descriptive enough to convey what it is. Extra stuff like "A" or "The" or "PEAR" should be removed from summaries. - Set BuildRequires: php-pear >= 1:1.4.9-1.2 Normally I would approve it now and request you make the changes in CVS, but the BuildRequires is a blocker and must be fixed before I can approve it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 7 18:28:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2006 14:28:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204525] Review Request: eclipse-gef - Eclipse Graphical Editing Framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609071828.k87ISTCn006060@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-gef - Eclipse Graphical Editing Framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204525 overholt at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From overholt at redhat.com 2006-09-07 14:28 EST ------- Built. Thanks, Anthony! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 7 18:40:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2006 14:40:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204832] Review Request: wxMaxima - wxWidgets interface for maxima In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609071840.k87Ieew0007551@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wxMaxima - wxWidgets interface for maxima https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204832 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-09-07 14:40 EST ------- typo fixed, imported, +owners.list, built for devel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 7 18:42:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2006 14:42:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205029] Review Request: autobuild-applet - a GNOME applet for monitoring Test-AutoBuild build status In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609071842.k87Igqbd007814@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: autobuild-applet - a GNOME applet for monitoring Test-AutoBuild build status https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205029 berrange at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From berrange at redhat.com 2006-09-07 14:42 EST ------- There was a little delay before I got access to plague. The RPM finally got built yesterday and should now be in rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 7 18:49:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2006 14:49:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190101] Review Request: php-pear-Log In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609071849.k87InLq3008647@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Log Alias: php-pear-Log https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190101 ------- Additional Comments From Fedora at FamilleCollet.com 2006-09-07 14:49 EST ------- SPEC : http://remi.collet.free.fr/rpms/extras/php-pear-Log.spec SRPM : http://remi.collet.free.fr/rpms/extras/php-pear-Log-1.9.8-5.fc5.src.rpm I've change then BR, but i really think it's not a BR - 1.4.9 is required to have --packagingroot working - 1.4.9-1.1 is required for memory limit, but 8M enough for this extension - 1.4.9-1.2 is required for macros, which are embeded in the spec. so... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 7 19:04:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2006 15:04:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196827] Review Request: php-pear-Image-GraphViz - PEAR: Interface to AT&T's GraphViz tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609071904.k87J4H92010367@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Image-GraphViz - PEAR: Interface to AT&T's GraphViz tools Alias: pear-Image-GraphViz https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196827 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |tibbs at math.uh.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-09-07 15:04 EST ------- Shouldn't this package have some kind of dependency on graphviz? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 7 19:17:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2006 15:17:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199108] Review Request: gutenprint: Printer Drivers Package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609071917.k87JH94S012930@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gutenprint: Printer Drivers Package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199108 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-09-07 15:17 EST ------- Excellent. I am still seeing: W: gutenprint mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs from rpmlint. You might replace the tabs with spaces in the spec... but thats not a blocker. It looks like the package conflicts with the gimp-print-plugin package in core: file /usr/lib/gimp/2.0/plug-ins/print from install of gutenprint-5.0.0- 0.10.fc6 conflicts with file from package gimp-print-plugin-4.2.7-20.1 Extras packages must not conflict with core packages. Is there some way to move the file or otherwise prevent the conflict? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 7 19:20:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2006 15:20:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204694] Review Request: zvbi - Raw VBI, Teletext and Closed Caption decoding library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609071920.k87JKRli013881@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: zvbi - Raw VBI, Teletext and Closed Caption decoding library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204694 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-09-07 15:20 EST ------- Excellent, looks good, APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 7 19:34:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2006 15:34:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205504] Review Request: rum - rug-like interface for yum In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609071934.k87JYoTD018384@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rum - rug-like interface for yum https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205504 rstrode at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(snorp at snorp.net) ------- Additional Comments From rstrode at redhat.com 2006-09-07 15:34 EST ------- Let me know when you've created an account, sent in the CLA, etc, and I'll move you over to sponsored status. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 7 19:40:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2006 15:40:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203694] Review Request: rawstudio - digital camera raw-image converter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609071940.k87JenZO020354@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rawstudio - digital camera raw-image converter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203694 bdpepple at ameritech.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |bdpepple at ameritech.net OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 7 19:42:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2006 15:42:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187294] Review Request: gwyddion In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609071942.k87JgwPl021119@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gwyddion https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187294 ------- Additional Comments From yeti at physics.muni.cz 2006-09-07 15:42 EST ------- (In reply to comment #13) Part I: Fixed stuff. Spec URI: http://gwyddion.net/download/test/gwyddion.spec SRPM URI: http://gwyddion.net/download/test/gwyddion-1.99.9-2.src.rpm * Thu Sep 07 2006 David Necas (Yeti) - 1.99.9-2 - Removed `remove shbangs from modules', not needed anymore - Fixed requirements of devel subpackage: require libs, not main; require pkgconfig; added missing gtkglext-devel (required since we build with it) - Don't own %%{_libdir}/pkgconfig directory - Avoided automated Provides: perl(Gwyddion::dump) - Moved ldconfig execution to libs subpackage scriptlet - Added desktop, MIME database handling scriptlets from Fedora wiki - Patch ltmain.sh instead of ex-post .la file removal (taken from FreeBSD port) > gwyddion-devel shouldn't own %{_libdir}/pkgconfig, but instead > Requires: pkgconfig Fixed. > The shebangs removal seems to be done now, so the following is certainly > not relevant anymore (as said in the comment ;-): > # Remove shbangs from modules (upstream 1.99.8 will fix that) > sed -i '1s/^#!.*//' ruby/gwyddion/dump.rb python/Gwyddion/dump.py Fixed. > For the desktop file you should have a look at: > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-254ddf07aae20a23ced8cecc219d8f73926e9755 Hopefully fixed. > There is something very strange, an include file below %_libdir: > /usr/lib/gwyddion/include/gwyconfig.h > I guess it is there because it is a generated include file so it > could include some platform-dependant informations... I have seen > that other libraries do the same, so I guess it is ok. Yes, it is a page taken from GLib book and it is there exactly for this reason, although it currently contains no *architecture*-dependent bits. But one should be able to install for example 32bits gwyddion libs with GtkGLExt enabled and 64bit with GtkGLExt disabled (not that concerns Fedora much but it explains the file). > Since the perl module is an internal module, the man page should > certainly not be shipped, and the automatically determined > Provides perl(Gwyddion::dump) should not be present > > Removing the provides may be achieved by > %define __perl_provides %{nil} Fixed. > I am not convinced that the -devel package should require the base package, > if plugin examples are removed. > but it should certainly require the libs package, so I propose changing > Requires: %{name} = %{version} > to > Requires: %{name}-libs = %{version}-%{release} Fixed. > The %post/%postun should be for the libs subpackage and not the main package. Fixed. > There are %post scriptlets missing for mime handling, you should have > a look at > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets?action=show&redirect=ScriptletSnippets#head-de6770dd9867fcd085a73a4700f6bcd0d10294ef > and > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets?action=show&redirect=ScriptletSnippets#head-5f93ed83c968bb73b052c06ba0d7139e28f35d93 Hopefully fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 7 19:46:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2006 15:46:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193896] Review Request: libreadline-java - Java wrapper for the GNU-readline library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609071946.k87JkYBr021538@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libreadline-java - Java wrapper for the GNU-readline library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193896 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |tibbs at math.uh.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-09-07 15:46 EST ------- Somehow this slipped through the cracks, but I'll take it for review now. The no-soname issue is, as far as I can tell, not a blocker. The jpp stuff in the release, however, is. You should just use a a plain integer release (with the appended dist tag). The simplest way to do this and interleave cleanly with the jpackage release number is to use, in this case, 0.8.0-11{?%dist} (i.e. drop the "jpp", increment the release by one, and append the dist tag.) Or you can divorce yourself from the jpackage numbering altogether; it's your choice. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 7 19:50:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2006 15:50:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196827] Review Request: php-pear-Image-GraphViz - PEAR: Interface to AT&T's GraphViz tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609071950.k87JoQoN021917@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Image-GraphViz - PEAR: Interface to AT&T's GraphViz tools Alias: pear-Image-GraphViz https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196827 ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2006-09-07 15:50 EST ------- Yeah, youre probably right. I added graphviz to the Requires. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 7 19:51:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2006 15:51:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203694] Review Request: rawstudio - digital camera raw-image converter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609071951.k87Jpq7u022050@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rawstudio - digital camera raw-image converter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203694 bdpepple at ameritech.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at ameritech.net 2006-09-07 15:51 EST ------- MD5Sums: 391f2a08ef0e9dd32b8de51347420d7b rawstudio-0.3.tar.gz Good: * Source URL is canonical * Upstream source tarball verified * Package name conforms to the Fedora Naming Guidelines * Group Tag is from the official list * Buildroot has all required elements * All paths begin with macros * All directories are owned by this or other packages * All necessary BuildRequires listed. * All desired features are enabled * Builds in mock fine * rpmlint produces no errors +1 APPROVE, and I'll also be your sponsor. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/Contributors#head-a89c07b5b8abe7748b6b39f0f89768d595234907 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 7 19:54:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2006 15:54:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190101] Review Request: php-pear-Log In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609071954.k87JsOAE022439@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Log Alias: php-pear-Log https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190101 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2006-09-07 15:54 EST ------- Yeah, I just logged in to approve this anyway because you had already defined the macros. Looks good now anyway, approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 7 19:56:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2006 15:56:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189195] Review Request: horde - php application framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609071956.k87Jujg0022745@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: horde - php application framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189195 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-09-07 15:56 EST ------- Well, it looks like all of the dependencies have been approved and should be in the repo soon. So who has what it takes to properly review this? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 7 19:59:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2006 15:59:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190101] Review Request: php-pear-Log In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609071959.k87Jx0bT022943@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Log Alias: php-pear-Log https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190101 ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2006-09-07 15:58 EST ------- BTW, could you be so kind and sync and build this package for FC5? I'm going to need this for some of my packages which I want to build on FC5. Thanks for all your work on this and the other php packages. :D -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 7 20:08:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2006 16:08:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205306] Review Request: perl-SUPER - Control superclass method dispatch In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609072008.k87K8M1O024037@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-SUPER - Control superclass method dispatch https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205306 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-09-07 16:08 EST ------- Updated: SRPM URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-SUPER-1.14-2.fc5.src.rpm SPEC URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-SUPER.spec I'm not explicitly requiring perl(DB) perl(UNIVERSAL) right now as a) they don't look to be required, and b) in any case they're in core, so I can quash this question on the ground it's moot anyways ;) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 7 20:16:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2006 16:16:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177105] Review Request: gnomeradio - Graphical FM-Tuner program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609072016.k87KGeFb024700@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnomeradio - Graphical FM-Tuner program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177105 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-09-07 16:16 EST ------- Looks like scrollkeeper has been fixed in rawhide. That leaves FC5, but it's at best a minor issue and I don't think it should block this package. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 7 20:19:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2006 16:19:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205504] Review Request: rum - rug-like interface for yum In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609072019.k87KJKhe024923@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rum - rug-like interface for yum https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205504 ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at ameritech.net 2006-09-07 16:19 EST ------- Quick note: the Source should be a full url. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 7 20:22:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2006 16:22:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205314] Review Request: perl-Class-C3 - Pragma to use the C3 method resolution order algorithm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609072022.k87KMGur025202@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Class-C3 - Pragma to use the C3 method resolution order algorithm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205314 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-09-07 16:22 EST ------- Updated: SRPM URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-Class-C3-0.13-2.fc5.src.rpm SPEC URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-Class-C3.spec (also checked build in mock, now ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 7 20:22:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2006 16:22:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192606] Review Request: yafc: yet another ftp client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609072022.k87KMhbK025232@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: yafc: yet another ftp client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192606 ------- Additional Comments From lists at forevermore.net 2006-09-07 16:22 EST ------- I think I addressed the requested issues. rpmlint is quiet now, too. spec: http://rpm.forevermore.net/yafc/yafc.spec srpm: http://rpm.forevermore.net/yafc/yafc-1.1.1-4.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 7 20:25:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2006 16:25:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205306] Review Request: perl-SUPER - Control superclass method dispatch In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609072025.k87KPKAO025383@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-SUPER - Control superclass method dispatch https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205306 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-09-07 16:25 EST ------- The provides are right now, but the description is still weird... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 7 20:28:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2006 16:28:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205314] Review Request: perl-Class-C3 - Pragma to use the C3 method resolution order algorithm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609072028.k87KSUb9025578@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Class-C3 - Pragma to use the C3 method resolution order algorithm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205314 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-09-07 16:27 EST ------- Why don't you BR perl(UNIVERSAL::can)? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 7 20:29:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2006 16:29:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190101] Review Request: php-pear-Log In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609072029.k87KTjRS025624@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Log Alias: php-pear-Log https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190101 Fedora at FamilleCollet.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 7 20:30:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2006 16:30:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196847] Review Request: php-pear-PHPUnit2 - PEAR: Regression testing framework for unit tests In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609072030.k87KU6QM025666@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-PHPUnit2 - PEAR: Regression testing framework for unit tests Alias: php-pear-PHPUnit2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196847 Bug 196847 depends on bug 190101, which changed state. Bug 190101 Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Log https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190101 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 7 20:30:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2006 16:30:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189195] Review Request: horde - php application framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609072030.k87KUS3g025694@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: horde - php application framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189195 Bug 189195 depends on bug 190101, which changed state. Bug 190101 Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Log https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190101 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 7 20:30:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2006 16:30:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196837] Review Request: php-pear-PHPUnit2-alpha - PEAR: Regression testing framework for unit tests In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609072030.k87KUqQf025772@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-PHPUnit2-alpha - PEAR: Regression testing framework for unit tests Alias: pear-PHPUnit2-alpha https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196837 Bug 196837 depends on bug 190101, which changed state. Bug 190101 Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Log https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190101 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 7 20:42:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2006 16:42:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187294] Review Request: gwyddion In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609072042.k87KgWDA026557@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gwyddion https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187294 ------- Additional Comments From yeti at physics.muni.cz 2006-09-07 16:42 EST ------- (In reply to comment #13) Part II: Unclear stuff. > There is a missing Requires on ruby and python in -devel (I would > have guessed that they were autodetected, but that's not > the case???). > However, the plugins should certainly be in a separate subpackage, > called maybe gwyddion-plugin-examples, together with all the > internal ruby/perl/python modules. Another benefit of doing > a subpackage is that this subpackage could have only > code in the public domain (as it seems to me, but I haven't checked > everything) and could have a a licence marked as such. The most clean solution from the packaging point of view perhaps would be to split the plug-in stuff by language and require individual interpreters in the subpackages. In fact, since there are two kinds of ruby plug-ins, there should be a plain ruby subpackage and a subpackage requiring narray. However from the upstream point of view this is rather unfortunate. The plug-ins are examples, they are not meant to be *used* (all perform the same function). If one installs the interpreter for a language one is interested in, one just gets as a benefit a working plug-in in that language as it becomes executable. The sample plug-ins could be even installed somewhere Gwyddion does not find them by default and the developer could be required to install them to ~/.gwyddion/plugins or elsewhere manually. But I can see no advantage in this extra hassle when it Just Works as it is. > These perl/ruby/python modules should certainly be in a > platform independent location (I would chose %{pkgdatadir}). Perhaps, if differing from every other installation is a good thing. What is the difference from, e.g., python itself? It has all .py files in /usr/lib64. > Wouldn't it be better if the perl/python/ruby modules where real > modules? No, but this needs an explanation. 1. All the plug-in stuff is more or less legacy. We will support it while it will make sense, but I would rather avoid anything that could be interpreted as encouragement of its use. 2. The modules are intended for dealing with a dumb file format that is only encountered in temporary files processed by a Gwyddion plug-in. The file format is not used anywhere else. > Poking around in the source files, I have seen something that looks > like a file for vim, if you feel like it you can make another subpackage > for that file. Well, is there any precedent? Guidelines? I cannot find any vim subpackage (or vim-foo where foo is not a vim subpackage) nor anything in Fedora wiki. Note it is an auxiliary C syntax file which has to be sourced from a main file. A manual action on user's side is necessary, people should not get automatically highlighted Gwyddion types and funcs in all C files (unless they set it up so). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 7 20:48:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2006 16:48:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205314] Review Request: perl-Class-C3 - Pragma to use the C3 method resolution order algorithm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609072048.k87Km48E026942@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Class-C3 - Pragma to use the C3 method resolution order algorithm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205314 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-09-07 16:47 EST ------- perl(UNIVERSAL::can) is both a module and a method; this code looks to build OK with the can method supplied by perl(UNIVERSAL) in base. (And more to point, doesn't appear to 'use UNIVERSAL::can;' anywhere.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 7 20:54:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2006 16:54:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205306] Review Request: perl-SUPER - Control superclass method dispatch In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609072054.k87KskIJ027305@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-SUPER - Control superclass method dispatch https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205306 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-09-07 16:54 EST ------- That's what I get for being too literal and not reading the text I'm fixing. I'll update to: "When subclassing a class, you occasionally want to dispatch control to the superclass -- at least conditionally and temporarily. This module provides an easier, cleaner way for class methods to access their ancestor's implementation." -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 7 20:56:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2006 16:56:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205306] Review Request: perl-SUPER - Control superclass method dispatch In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609072056.k87Kue8s027529@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-SUPER - Control superclass method dispatch https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205306 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-09-07 16:56 EST ------- Updated: SRPM URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-SUPER-1.14-3.fc5.src.rpm SPEC URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-SUPER.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 7 21:05:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2006 17:05:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197411] Review Request: php-pear-Date - PEAR: Date and Time Zone Classes In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609072105.k87L5eEl028382@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Date - PEAR: Date and Time Zone Classes Alias: php-pear-Date https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197411 ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2006-09-07 17:05 EST ------- I'm not sure, but the test dir is a standard php-pear dir and is defined in the macros, so I'm sure lots of packages have stuff there. But AFAIK, there is no standard way to run tests that are there. Perhaps we should assess the situation after more php packages have been approved and see if the tests directory is really needed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 7 21:24:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2006 17:24:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197411] Review Request: php-pear-Date - PEAR: Date and Time Zone Classes In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609072124.k87LOBqs029733@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Date - PEAR: Date and Time Zone Classes Alias: php-pear-Date https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197411 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 7 21:24:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2006 17:24:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197417] Review Request: php-pear-Validate - PEAR: Validation class In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609072124.k87LOPPr029780@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Validate - PEAR: Validation class Alias: php-pear-Validate https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197417 Bug 197417 depends on bug 197411, which changed state. Bug 197411 Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Date - PEAR: Date and Time Zone Classes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197411 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 7 21:43:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2006 17:43:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187294] Review Request: gwyddion In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609072143.k87Lhb9h030978@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gwyddion https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187294 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-09-07 17:43 EST ------- (In reply to comment #16) > (In reply to comment #13) > > > The most clean solution from the packaging point of view perhaps would be to > split the plug-in stuff by language and require individual interpreters in the > subpackages. In fact, since there are two kinds of ruby plug-ins, there should > be a plain ruby subpackage and a subpackage requiring narray. > > However from the upstream point of view this is rather unfortunate. The > plug-ins are examples, they are not meant to be *used* (all perform the same > function). If one installs the interpreter for a language one is interested in, > one just gets as a benefit a working plug-in in that language as it becomes > executable. I don't really get what you mean with 'upstream point of view'. If they are examples they shouldn't be installed (but shipped in docs or the like). If they are usefull they should be packaged correctly. > The sample plug-ins could be even installed somewhere Gwyddion does not find > them by default and the developer could be required to install them to > ~/.gwyddion/plugins or elsewhere manually. But I can see no advantage in this > extra hassle when it Just Works as it is. Then it should work as it is, but it shouldn't prevent from doing a clean package. Splitting out a gwyddion-perl-plugin, and so on for other languages wouldn't do any harm and would be more sensible for packaging. > > These perl/ruby/python modules should certainly be in a > > platform independent location (I would chose %{pkgdatadir}). > > Perhaps, if differing from every other installation is a good thing. What is > the difference from, e.g., python itself? It has all .py files in /usr/lib64. That's untrue. Perl and python have 2 macros, one for noarch and the other for arch dependent stuff. noarch is in /usr/lib/ even on x64. You can use /usr/lib instead of /usr/share but /usr/share is cleaner (and I believe that the use of lib for arch independent things comes from past uses). Internal modules are better in %_datadir, and some packages indeed use that place for their internal modules, just try find /usr/share/ -name '*.py' find /usr/share/ -name '*.pm' > No, but this needs an explanation. > > 1. All the plug-in stuff is more or less legacy. We will support it while it > will make sense, but I would rather avoid anything that could be interpreted as > encouragement of its use. Once again, if it is packaged, it should be done rightly, even if it is different from upstream, or it shouldn't be packaged at all. The best would be to install the modules like any other module. For perl, however, there is no support upstream for a classical module install (with Makefile.PL and the like). So just copying them in a relevant location is all we can do in fedora (you could also add a Makefile.PL, and patch the build system to integrate it cleanly, but it is more work and, as a reviewer I think it shouldn't be a blocker). In the general case, the choices done upstream are not necessarily the same that are done when packaging. When packaging, there should be an adaptation of the package to the distribution. Upstream is sometime too generic, and specific things are to be done. When packaging in fedora you may have to change your point of view and do some things differently than upstream. Only on relevant details, of course. > 2. The modules are intended for dealing with a dumb file format that is only > encountered in temporary files processed by a Gwyddion plug-in. The file format > is not used anywhere else. So if plugins are allowed these modules are usefull. Once again, since there is no support upstream they should be packaged simply. > > Poking around in the source files, I have seen something that looks > > like a file for vim, if you feel like it you can make another subpackage > > for that file. > > Well, is there any precedent? Guidelines? I cannot find any vim subpackage (or > vim-foo where foo is not a vim subpackage) nor anything in Fedora wiki. You are indeed right. That's very strange as there are a lot of emacs related subpackages. There is no precedent, but we could make one. If you don't feel like it, I guess the best would be to ship the .vim file in a %docs section. If you know vim enough you can also do a subpackage which would hold the file in a suitable directory. I have another package with a .vim file in %docs installed. > Note it is an auxiliary C syntax file which has to be sourced from a main file. > A manual action on user's side is necessary, people should not get > automatically highlighted Gwyddion types and funcs in all C files (unless they > set it up so). Ok. I don't know how such file work, but if it is better in the vim hierarchy it could be there. Not a blocker in my opinion, just a bonus. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 7 21:45:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2006 17:45:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205306] Review Request: perl-SUPER - Control superclass method dispatch In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609072145.k87LjVp3031081@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-SUPER - Control superclass method dispatch https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205306 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-09-07 17:45 EST ------- APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 7 21:49:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2006 17:49:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205314] Review Request: perl-Class-C3 - Pragma to use the C3 method resolution order algorithm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609072149.k87Lnvup031285@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Class-C3 - Pragma to use the C3 method resolution order algorithm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205314 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-09-07 17:49 EST ------- Ok, you're right. * rpmlint is silent * package named according to guidelines * free software, without licence files included * meets packaging guidelines * spec legible * source match upstream 95b52572a765b9d9103b264a15e323a1 Class-C3-0.13.tar.gz * sane provides Provides: perl(Class::C3) = 0.01 * %files right APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 7 22:05:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2006 18:05:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 181035] Review Request: luks-tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609072205.k87M53dU031867@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: luks-tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=181035 ------- Additional Comments From redhat at flyn.org 2006-09-07 18:05 EST ------- Spec Name or Url: http://www.flyn.org/SRPMS/luks-tools.spec SRPM Name or Url: http://www.flyn.org/SRPMS/luks-tools-0.0.10-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 7 22:13:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2006 18:13:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205318] Review Request: perl-Class-MOP - Class::MOP Perl module In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609072213.k87MDICX032120@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Class-MOP - Class::MOP Perl module https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205318 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |pertusus at free.fr OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-09-07 18:13 EST ------- Blocker: Test::Pod::Coverage and Test::Pod BR are missing. Otherwise * rpmlint is silent * package named according to guidelines * free software, without licence files included * meets packaging guidelines * spec legible * source match upstream 88ae60fc9fe161598739f3de59d6932e Class-MOP-0.34.tar.gz * sane provides Provides: perl(Class::MOP) = 0.34 perl(Class::MOP::Attribute) = 0.12 perl(Class::MOP::Attribute::Accessor) = 0.01 perl(Class::MOP::Class) = 0.19 perl(Class::MOP::Class::Immutable) = 0.02 perl(Class::MOP::Instance) = 0.03 perl(Class::MOP::Method) = 0.03 perl(Class::MOP::Method::Wrapped) = 0.01 perl(Class::MOP::Module) = 0.02 perl(Class::MOP::Object) = 0.02 perl(Class::MOP::Package) = 0.04 perl(metaclass) = 0.03 * %files right -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 7 22:27:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2006 18:27:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205269] Review Request: perl-Sub-Exporter - Sophisticated exporter for custom-built routines In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609072227.k87MRdgc032752@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Sub-Exporter - Sophisticated exporter for custom-built routines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205269 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |pertusus at free.fr OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-09-07 18:27 EST ------- * rpmlint is silent * package named according to guidelines * free software, without licence files included * meets packaging guidelines * spec legible * source match upstream 10eaa77a13de4c23640cdd1aaf0f2412 Sub-Exporter-0.970.tar.gz * sane provides Provides: perl(Sub::Exporter) = 0.970 perl(Sub::Exporter::Util) = 0.020 * %files right APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 7 23:10:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2006 19:10:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205318] Review Request: perl-Class-MOP - Class::MOP Perl module In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609072310.k87NAfBS002270@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Class-MOP - Class::MOP Perl module https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205318 Bug 205318 depends on bug 205306, which changed state. Bug 205306 Summary: Review Request: perl-SUPER - Control superclass method dispatch https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205306 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 7 23:10:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2006 19:10:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205306] Review Request: perl-SUPER - Control superclass method dispatch In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609072310.k87NAbdr002248@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-SUPER - Control superclass method dispatch https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205306 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-09-07 19:10 EST ------- +Import to CVS +Add to owners.list +Bump release, build for devel +Request branching +Close bug Thanks for the review! :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 7 23:13:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2006 19:13:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205314] Review Request: perl-Class-C3 - Pragma to use the C3 method resolution order algorithm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609072313.k87NDkoG002412@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Class-C3 - Pragma to use the C3 method resolution order algorithm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205314 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-09-07 19:13 EST ------- +Import to CVS +Add to owners.list +Bump release, build for devel +Request branching (FC-5) +Close bug Thanks for the review! :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 7 23:14:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2006 19:14:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205314] Review Request: perl-Class-C3 - Pragma to use the C3 method resolution order algorithm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609072314.k87NEmpa002462@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Class-C3 - Pragma to use the C3 method resolution order algorithm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205314 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 7 23:15:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2006 19:15:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205318] Review Request: perl-Class-MOP - Class::MOP Perl module In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609072315.k87NFA9l002505@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Class-MOP - Class::MOP Perl module https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205318 Bug 205318 depends on bug 205314, which changed state. Bug 205314 Summary: Review Request: perl-Class-C3 - Pragma to use the C3 method resolution order algorithm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205314 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 7 23:19:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2006 19:19:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205321] Review Request: perl-Moose - Complete modern object system for Perl 5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609072319.k87NJqU0002745@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Moose - Complete modern object system for Perl 5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205321 Bug 205321 depends on bug 205269, which changed state. Bug 205269 Summary: Review Request: perl-Sub-Exporter - Sophisticated exporter for custom-built routines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205269 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 7 23:19:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2006 19:19:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205269] Review Request: perl-Sub-Exporter - Sophisticated exporter for custom-built routines In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609072319.k87NJpZE002740@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Sub-Exporter - Sophisticated exporter for custom-built routines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205269 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-09-07 19:19 EST ------- +Import to CVS +Add to owners.list +Bump release, build for devel +Request branching (FC-5) +Close bug -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 7 23:23:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2006 19:23:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205318] Review Request: perl-Class-MOP - Class::MOP Perl module In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609072323.k87NN8cQ002885@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Class-MOP - Class::MOP Perl module https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205318 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-09-07 19:23 EST ------- Updated: SRPM URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-Class-MOP-0.34-2.fc5.src.rpm SPEC URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-Class-MOP.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 7 23:32:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2006 19:32:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205318] Review Request: perl-Class-MOP - Class::MOP Perl module In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609072332.k87NWLXH003441@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Class-MOP - Class::MOP Perl module https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205318 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-09-07 19:32 EST ------- APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 7 23:38:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2006 19:38:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205318] Review Request: perl-Class-MOP - Class::MOP Perl module In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609072338.k87NcpmJ003737@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Class-MOP - Class::MOP Perl module https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205318 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-09-07 19:38 EST ------- +Import to CVS +Add to owners.list +Bump release, build for devel +Request branching (FC-5) +Close bug Thanks for the review! :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 7 23:38:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2006 19:38:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205321] Review Request: perl-Moose - Complete modern object system for Perl 5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609072338.k87NcpTN003741@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Moose - Complete modern object system for Perl 5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205321 Bug 205321 depends on bug 205318, which changed state. Bug 205318 Summary: Review Request: perl-Class-MOP - Class::MOP Perl module https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205318 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 8 00:21:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2006 20:21:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187294] Review Request: gwyddion In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609080021.k880LR3N005120@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gwyddion https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187294 ------- Additional Comments From yeti at physics.muni.cz 2006-09-07 20:21 EST ------- (In reply to comment #17) > I don't really get what you mean with 'upstream point of view'. If they > are examples they shouldn't be installed (but shipped in docs or the like). > If they are usefull they should be packaged correctly. Well, what's for example in /usr/share/cvs/contrib then (or other contrib dirs)? Mere examples? But they cause cvs -> tcsh dependency. User executables? But they are not in PATH and they are [cite]REALLY UNSUPORTED[/cite]. Auxiliary executables? But they are not in libexec and they are not used by anything. Documentation? But they are not in a documentation directory, and a perl script is hardly documentation it's something that needs documentation itself. Things have various modes of use, not everything is black and white. So to get somewhere, what is the scenario under which the current approach actually breaks? What is the problem users of the current package would encounter? Or at least, what forbids this mode of use? I maintain the devel subpackage does not need perl, python nor ruby. It is however made ready to be used with them *if* one decides so. Someone implementing a perl script without perl and blaming the packagers for missing dependencies when it doesn't run is exactly as ridiculous as someone writing an TeX document without TeX and blaming the packagers for missing dependencies when it doesn't compile to DVI. > That's untrue. By python I referred to `python': $ rpm -ql python | grep '\.py$' | grep -c ^/usr/share 0 $ rpm -ql python | grep '\.py$' | grep -c ^/usr/lib64 550 > Internal modules are better in %_datadir, > and some packages indeed use that place for their internal modules, > just try > find /usr/share/ -name '*.py' > find /usr/share/ -name '*.pm I tried it before and the key word is `some'. There is more than 20x more .py files in lib64 than in share on my system (some are indirectly arch-dependent, but anyway). It is not a problem to put the modules to %{_datadir} instead of %{_libdir}. I just think one has to have a reason to deviate from upstream. And I cannot see the reason when the consistency gain is only virtual. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 8 00:23:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2006 20:23:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196827] Review Request: php-pear-Image-GraphViz - PEAR: Interface to AT&T's GraphViz tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609080023.k880N32u005209@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Image-GraphViz - PEAR: Interface to AT&T's GraphViz tools Alias: pear-Image-GraphViz https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196827 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-09-07 20:23 EST ------- Cool. Builds OK and rpmlint has only it's usual dangerous-command-in-%post spew which should be ignored. * source files match upstream: 8828e58960e0d93820cb3bdcce85e705 Image_GraphViz-1.2.1.tgz * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * dist tag is present. * build root is correct. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. License text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * rpmlint is silent (except for erroneous warnings) * final provides and requires are sane: php-pear(Image_GraphViz) = 1.2.1 php-pear-Image-GraphViz = 1.2.1-1.fc6 = /bin/sh /usr/bin/pear graphviz php-pear(PEAR) * %check is not present; no test suite upstream. * package is not relocatable. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * scriptlets are OK (PEAR module installation) * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 8 00:35:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2006 20:35:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196843] Review Request: php-pear-Benchmark - PEAR: Framework to benchmark PHP scripts or function calls In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609080035.k880ZSQn005959@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Benchmark - PEAR: Framework to benchmark PHP scripts or function calls Alias: php-pear-Benchmark https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196843 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |tibbs at math.uh.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 8 00:41:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2006 20:41:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196827] Review Request: php-pear-Image-GraphViz - PEAR: Interface to AT&T's GraphViz tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609080041.k880fAoR006318@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Image-GraphViz - PEAR: Interface to AT&T's GraphViz tools Alias: pear-Image-GraphViz https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196827 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 8 00:41:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2006 20:41:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196837] Review Request: php-pear-PHPUnit2-alpha - PEAR: Regression testing framework for unit tests In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609080041.k880fPBK006350@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-PHPUnit2-alpha - PEAR: Regression testing framework for unit tests Alias: pear-PHPUnit2-alpha https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196837 Bug 196837 depends on bug 196827, which changed state. Bug 196827 Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Image-GraphViz - PEAR: Interface to AT&T's GraphViz tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196827 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 8 00:47:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2006 20:47:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204694] Review Request: zvbi - Raw VBI, Teletext and Closed Caption decoding library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609080047.k880lZT5006691@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: zvbi - Raw VBI, Teletext and Closed Caption decoding library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204694 packages at amiga-hardware.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From packages at amiga-hardware.com 2006-09-07 20:47 EST ------- Thanks for the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 8 00:48:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2006 20:48:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204421] Review Request: kdetv - KDE application for watching TV In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609080048.k880mItM006740@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdetv - KDE application for watching TV https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204421 Bug 204421 depends on bug 204694, which changed state. Bug 204694 Summary: Review Request: zvbi - Raw VBI, Teletext and Closed Caption decoding library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204694 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|NEW |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 8 00:53:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2006 20:53:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187294] Review Request: gwyddion In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609080053.k880rcUV006941@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gwyddion https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187294 ------- Additional Comments From yeti at physics.muni.cz 2006-09-07 20:53 EST ------- OK, there is in fact a breakage scenario, albeit quite different: If a 3rd party writes a plug-in and wants to distribute it (the scenario I'd rather avoid), it now requires the devel subpackage instead of runtime, because the langauage modules are in devel. To guarantee executability of plug-ins, the main package has to require (or contain) all the perl, python, ruby, ..., modules. But even then the perl, python or ruby dependency is redundant. The main package does not use them, it merely provides/requires modules. Any 3d party plug-in has to require its own interpreter so interpreter dependencies are satisfied. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 8 01:20:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2006 21:20:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196843] Review Request: php-pear-Benchmark - PEAR: Framework to benchmark PHP scripts or function calls In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609080120.k881Kpnf008078@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Benchmark - PEAR: Framework to benchmark PHP scripts or function calls Alias: php-pear-Benchmark https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196843 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-09-07 21:20 EST ------- * source files match upstream: b130c602f82ee07af4021a59b6359003 Benchmark-1.2.6.tgz * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * dist tag is present. * build root is correct. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. License text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * rpmlint is silent (except for bogus dangerous-command-in-%post warning). * final provides and requires are sane: php-pear(Benchmark) = 1.2.6 php-pear-Benchmark = 1.2.6-1.fc6 = /bin/sh /usr/bin/pear php-bcmath (note that Requires(hint) is currently the same as Requires) php-pear(PEAR) * %check is not present; no test suite upstream. * package is not relocatable. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 8 01:24:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2006 21:24:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197413] Review Request: php-pear-Net-Curl - PEAR: OO interface to PHP's cURL extension In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609080124.k881Oj5J008293@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Net-Curl - PEAR: OO interface to PHP's cURL extension Alias: php-pear-Net-Curl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197413 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |tibbs at math.uh.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 8 01:34:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2006 21:34:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196843] Review Request: php-pear-Benchmark - PEAR: Framework to benchmark PHP scripts or function calls In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609080134.k881Ygo1008669@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Benchmark - PEAR: Framework to benchmark PHP scripts or function calls Alias: php-pear-Benchmark https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196843 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 8 01:34:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2006 21:34:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196847] Review Request: php-pear-PHPUnit2 - PEAR: Regression testing framework for unit tests In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609080134.k881YriN008684@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-PHPUnit2 - PEAR: Regression testing framework for unit tests Alias: php-pear-PHPUnit2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196847 Bug 196847 depends on bug 196843, which changed state. Bug 196843 Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Benchmark - PEAR: Framework to benchmark PHP scripts or function calls https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196843 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 8 01:41:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2006 21:41:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197413] Review Request: php-pear-Net-Curl - PEAR: OO interface to PHP's cURL extension In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609080141.k881fGki009123@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Net-Curl - PEAR: OO interface to PHP's cURL extension Alias: php-pear-Net-Curl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197413 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-09-07 21:41 EST ------- Hmm, it looks like you install the LICENSE file in %prep, but it doesn't seem to make it into the final package. * source files match upstream: 6a26900c1111336aa45615d4a3a4f66a Net_Curl-1.2.3.tgz * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * dist tag is present. * build root is correct. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * rpmlint is silent (except for the usual bogus dangerous-command warning) * final provides and requires are sane: php-pear(Net_Curl) = 1.2.3 php-pear-Net-Curl = 1.2.3-1.fc6 = /bin/sh /usr/bin/pear php-pear(PEAR) * %check is not present; no test suite upstream. * package is not relocatable. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * scriptlets are OK (PEAR module installation) * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 8 01:46:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2006 21:46:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197413] Review Request: php-pear-Net-Curl - PEAR: OO interface to PHP's cURL extension In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609080146.k881kQpj009414@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Net-Curl - PEAR: OO interface to PHP's cURL extension Alias: php-pear-Net-Curl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197413 ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2006-09-07 21:46 EST ------- SPEC: http://tkmame.retrogames.com/fedora-extras/php-pear-Net-Curl.spec SRPM: http://tkmame.retrogames.com/fedora-extras/php-pear-Net-Curl-1.2.3-2.src.rpm %changelog * Thu Sep 07 2006 Christopher Stone 1.2.3-2 - Add LICENSE file to %%doc -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 8 01:46:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2006 21:46:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197419] Review Request: php-pear-Validate-Finance-CreditCard - PEAR: Validation class for Credit Cards In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609080146.k881kL8h009399@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Validate-Finance-CreditCard - PEAR: Validation class for Credit Cards Alias: Validate-Finance-CC https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197419 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |tibbs at math.uh.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 8 02:04:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2006 22:04:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197419] Review Request: php-pear-Validate-Finance-CreditCard - PEAR: Validation class for Credit Cards In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609080204.k8824PCL010266@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Validate-Finance-CreditCard - PEAR: Validation class for Credit Cards Alias: Validate-Finance-CC https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197419 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-09-07 22:03 EST ------- * source files match upstream: a4eb8f52783b2f15ea99f0210ab1eda8 Validate_Finance_CreditCard-0.5.2.tgz * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * dist tag is present. * build root is correct. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. License text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * rpmlint is silent (except for the bogus dangerous-command warning) * final provides and requires are sane: php-pear(Validate_Finance_CreditCard) = 0.5.2 php-pear-Validate-Finance-CreditCard = 0.5.2-1.fc6 = /bin/sh /usr/bin/pear php-pear(PEAR) * %check is not present; not currently possible to run the test suite in an automated fashion. * package is not relocatable. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * scriptlets OK (PEAR module installation) * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 8 02:19:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2006 22:19:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197419] Review Request: php-pear-Validate-Finance-CreditCard - PEAR: Validation class for Credit Cards In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609080219.k882J02Z011359@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Validate-Finance-CreditCard - PEAR: Validation class for Credit Cards Alias: Validate-Finance-CC https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197419 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 8 02:19:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2006 22:19:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197420] Review Request: php-pear-Payment-Process - PEAR: Unified payment processor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609080219.k882JTNi011401@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Payment-Process - PEAR: Unified payment processor Alias: pear-Payment-Process https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197420 Bug 197420 depends on bug 197419, which changed state. Bug 197419 Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Validate-Finance-CreditCard - PEAR: Validation class for Credit Cards https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197419 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 8 02:22:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2006 22:22:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197413] Review Request: php-pear-Net-Curl - PEAR: OO interface to PHP's cURL extension In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609080222.k882M2T8011525@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Net-Curl - PEAR: OO interface to PHP's cURL extension Alias: php-pear-Net-Curl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197413 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-09-07 22:21 EST ------- Looks good now. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 8 02:24:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2006 22:24:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204975] Review Request: vigra - Generic Programming for Computer Vision In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609080224.k882OINe011672@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vigra - Generic Programming for Computer Vision https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204975 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |kevin at tummy.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-09-07 22:24 EST ------- Thanks for the prelim review Parag. OK - Package name OK - Spec file matches base package name. OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines. OK - License (MIT) OK - License field in spec matches OK - License file included in package OK - Spec in American English OK - Spec is legible. OK - Sources match upstream md5sum: ea91f2fb4212a21d708aced277e6e85a vigra1.4.0.tar.gz ea91f2fb4212a21d708aced277e6e85a vigra1.4.0.tar.gz.1 OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch. OK - BuildRequires correct OK - Spec has needed ldconfig in post and postun OK - Package owns all the directories it creates. OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files. See below - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. OK - Package has a correct %clean section. OK - Spec has consistant macro usage. OK - Package is code or permissible content. OK - -doc subpackage needed/used. OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime. OK - Headers/static libs in -devel subpackage. OK - .so files in -devel subpackage. OK - -devel package Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} OK - .la files are removed. OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. OK - No rpmlint output. SHOULD Items: OK - Should include License or ask upstream to include it. OK - Should build in mock. OK - Should have sane scriptlets. OK - Should have subpackages require base package with fully versioned depend. Issues: 1. You might change your default attibute lines from: %defattr(-, root, root) to %defattr(-, root, root,-) (To keep directory permissions the same and not use umask) 2. This package appears to be able to use 'boost python'. Might look into submitting boost and boost-python? Neither of those are blockers, you might fix the first before importing. I am happy to APPROVE this package and sponsor you. Note that your other submission was approved, so you should be able to import it as well. Continue from step 6 under (Get a Fedora Account): http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/Contributors#head- a89c07b5b8abe7748b6b39f0f89768d595234907 If you have any questions at all, feel free to email me or catch me on irc in #fedora-extras (my nick is nirik). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 8 02:25:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2006 22:25:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200064] Review Request: libpano12 : Library and tools for manipulating panoramic images In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609080225.k882Pr0k011826@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libpano12 : Library and tools for manipulating panoramic images https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200064 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-09-07 22:25 EST ------- Removing FE-NEEDSPONSOR as submitter was sponsored in: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204975 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 8 02:33:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2006 22:33:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197413] Review Request: php-pear-Net-Curl - PEAR: OO interface to PHP's cURL extension In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609080233.k882XxLl012328@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Net-Curl - PEAR: OO interface to PHP's cURL extension Alias: php-pear-Net-Curl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197413 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 8 02:34:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2006 22:34:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197420] Review Request: php-pear-Payment-Process - PEAR: Unified payment processor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609080234.k882YMBJ012371@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Payment-Process - PEAR: Unified payment processor Alias: pear-Payment-Process https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197420 Bug 197420 depends on bug 197413, which changed state. Bug 197413 Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Net-Curl - PEAR: OO interface to PHP's cURL extension https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197413 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 8 03:07:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2006 23:07:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189150] Review Request: mod_mono In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609080307.k88379CN014775@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mod_mono https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189150 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |kevin at tummy.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-09-07 23:06 EST ------- OK - Package name OK - Spec file matches base package name. OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines. See below - License See below - License field in spec matches See below - License file included in package OK - Spec in American English OK - Spec is legible. OK - Sources match upstream md5sum: 3f0408a350f6f55029b75f4332be171f mod_mono-1.1.17.tar.gz 3f0408a350f6f55029b75f4332be171f mod_mono-1.1.17.tar.gz.1 OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch. OK - BuildRequires correct OK - Spec handles locales/find_lang OK - Spec has needed ldconfig in post and postun OK - Package owns all the directories it creates. OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files. See below - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. See below - Package has a correct %clean section. OK - Spec has consistant macro usage. OK - Package is code or permissible content. OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime. OK - .la files are removed. OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. OK - No rpmlint output. SHOULD Items: See below - Should include License or ask upstream to include it. OK - Should build in mock. Issues: 1. URL and Source0 are not correct. URL should be the link to the website of the package. Suggest something like: http://www.mono-project.com/Mod_mono Source0 should be the full link to the source file. Suggest something like: http://go-mono.com/sources/mod_mono/mod_mono-1.1.17.tar.gz 2. The License looks wrong. The code and the COPYING file are the Apache License, Version 2.0. NOT the GPL. Note that these items are duplicated from comment #6. Can you fix them? Or indicate why not? 3. Might include the INSTALL doc? In many cases this is a generic document from the auto tools, but in this case it has some useful apache configuration information, IMHO. 4. Might change the defattr from: %defattr(-, root, root) to %defattr(-, root, root,-) 5. You seem to be missing a %clean section. Please add one. 6. You should perhaps Require: httpd >= 2.2 ? Otherwise this package is pretty useless without apache? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 8 03:17:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2006 23:17:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189150] Review Request: mod_mono In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609080317.k883Hug2015820@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mod_mono https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189150 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-09-07 23:17 EST ------- Oh, I ran rpmlint on the wrong build. It reports: W: mod_mono conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/httpd/conf.d/mod_mono.conf Should set that to be %config(noreplace) ? E: mod_mono no-cleaning-of-buildroot E: mod_mono no-%clean-section That would get fixed by adding a %clean section... W: mod_mono mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs Would be good to clean out and only use spaces or tabs... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 8 03:22:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2006 23:22:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199108] Review Request: gutenprint: Printer Drivers Package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609080322.k883MPiT016235@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gutenprint: Printer Drivers Package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199108 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-09-07 23:22 EST ------- But actually all gimp-print packages must be obsolete by this package. AFAIK this package will be replacing gimp-print in FC7 core. Becuase gimp-print is now old and its next version is gutenprint. Should i create similar way of gimp-print-plugin rpm created by gimp-print spec here in my case also. I mean Do i need to have separate package for file /usr/lib/gimp/2.0/plug-ins/print ?? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 8 03:41:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2006 23:41:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200662] Review Request: lostirc In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609080341.k883foHK018078@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lostirc https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200662 ------- Additional Comments From michael at knox.net.nz 2006-09-07 23:41 EST ------- Sorry for the delay... Updated spec and srpm. I have not tested on rawhide, my local mirror is throwing up bad checksums all the time. Need to rsync it again I think. Spec URL: http://www.knox.net.nz/~michael/lostirc.spec SRPM URL: http://www.knox.net.nz/~michael/lostirc-0.4.6-3.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 8 03:54:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2006 23:54:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204343] Review Request: qcomicbook - a comic book viewing program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609080354.k883suZp019541@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qcomicbook - a comic book viewing program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204343 jpmahowald at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2006-09-07 23:54 EST ------- + Comment 8 still applies. + file permissions good + proper macros + follows naming guidelines + rpmlint clean For readability consider removing the unused commented out lines. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 8 04:07:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2006 00:07:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193896] Review Request: libreadline-java - Java wrapper for the GNU-readline library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609080407.k8847hJk020321@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libreadline-java - Java wrapper for the GNU-readline library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193896 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-09-08 00:07 EST ------- Hmm, this builds but will not install on current rawhide: Error: Missing Dependency: readline = 5.0 is needed by package libreadline-java Rawhide has readline 5.1; I changed readline_ver to match and it seems to be OK. Also, there are a few rpmlint warnings; I think it now checks for more than it did when I first looked at this package. W: libreadline-java macro-in-%changelog _jnidir W: libreadline-java macro-in-%changelog _libdir You need to double any percent symbols that appear in the changelog, lest they be expanded in the final RPM. E: libreadline-java no-cleaning-of-buildroot You need rpm -rf %{buildroot} at the beginning of %install. W: libreadline-java mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs It's complaining about a couple of tabs after Group: (use "less -U" to see them). This isn't a blocker. The debuginfo package is now missing the source again. I'm at a loss as to why this is continually a problem, but it's not really a blocker. Perhaps some day someone will actually understand what's going on here. You need to include COPYING.LIB as %doc. Shouldn't the jar file go in /usr/share/java? If not, nothing in your dependency chain owns /usr/lib/java. * source files match upstream: 501720ddded45eaedf429b7cc356107c libreadline-java-0.8.0-src.tar.gz X package meets naming and packaging guidelines (non-numeric release bits). * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. X dist tag is present. * build root is correct. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. X license text upstream but not included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * compiler flags are appropriate. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). ? debuginfo package looks complete. X rpmlint has valid complaints X final provides and requires are sane: libreadline-java = 0.8.0-10jpp_3fc = X readline = 5.0 /sbin/ldconfig java-gcj-compat >= 1.0.31 /bin/sh * %check is not present; no test suite upstream. * a shared library is present and ldconfig is called properly. * package is not relocatable. ? owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * scriptlets OK (ldconfig, gcj-db) * code, not content. * javadocs split out into separate jackage. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no libtool .la droppings. * unversioned .so in -devel subpackage. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 8 04:12:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2006 00:12:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200662] Review Request: lostirc In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609080412.k884COTB020581@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lostirc https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200662 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-09-08 00:12 EST ------- This builds fine on rawhide; the desktop problem is fixed as well. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 8 04:35:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2006 00:35:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200666] Review Request: theora-exp - Experimental theora decoder In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609080435.k884ZZFq021689@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: theora-exp - Experimental theora decoder https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200666 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-09-08 00:35 EST ------- Now this is failing to build in rboth FC5 and awhide for me: apiwrapper.c:7:27: error: theora/theora.h: No such file or directory and various other errors cascading from that one. I'm not sure what has happened to cause the same package to fail to build. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 8 04:38:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2006 00:38:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199108] Review Request: gutenprint: Printer Drivers Package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609080438.k884craJ021951@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gutenprint: Printer Drivers Package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199108 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-09-08 00:38 EST ------- Anyway i have upgraded package to create one more sub-package gutenprint-plugin and i hope now there will be no more rpmlint warnings you will find. But yes it will be problematic for core gimp-print package I already added commented lines in SPEC that will obsolete core packages. But its not allowed right? Updated package Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/pnemade/gutenprint/gutenprint.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/pnemade/gutenprint/gutenprint-5.0.0-0.11.fc6.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 8 04:39:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2006 00:39:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200666] Review Request: theora-exp - Experimental theora decoder In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609080439.k884doi5022005@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: theora-exp - Experimental theora decoder https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200666 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-09-08 00:39 EST ------- Do you have libtheora-devel installed, or in the case of mock added to the BuildRequires, as discussed in comment 2 that is needed to build and currnetly missing from the BR. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 8 04:45:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2006 00:45:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200666] Review Request: theora-exp - Experimental theora decoder In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609080445.k884jC1o022361@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: theora-exp - Experimental theora decoder https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200666 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-09-08 00:44 EST ------- You're right, I must have added that and built a fresh package but I didn't save it. I just pulled down the SRPM in comment 1 to have another look and start on a review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 8 04:45:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2006 00:45:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200662] Review Request: lostirc In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609080445.k884joeb022412@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lostirc https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200662 michael at knox.net.nz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From michael at knox.net.nz 2006-09-08 00:45 EST ------- Imported and built. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 8 04:54:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2006 00:54:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199108] Review Request: gutenprint: Printer Drivers Package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609080454.k884s9ph022725@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gutenprint: Printer Drivers Package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199108 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-09-08 00:53 EST ------- Thats unfortunate. Extras packages are not supposed to conflict or obsolete core packages (Although there could be a explicit statement about that in the review/packaging guidelines). I see two ways forward: 1. Since this package will replace gimp-print in FC7 we can leave the package here (updating with new releases, etc) and wait until FC7 opens up for new packages and then have the core folks import this package to replace gimp print. This means people won't be able to easily use it until it's imported in core however. 2. (prefered by me) Is there any way that this package can install along side (but not conflicting with) gimp-print and allow users to select which one they wish to use? I see encouraging signs of this in the README, like: "Installing the CUPS driver for Gutenprint 5.0 will not interfere with your ability to continue using the Gimp-Print 4.2 CUPS driver." and * Gutenprint permits installation of Gimp-Print 4.2 alongside Gutenprint 5.0, and in the future will permit concurrent installation of different stable versions of Gutenprint with different minor version numbers. Gutenprint uses the old-style kernel numbering system, whereby even numbered minor versions are stable (4.2, 5.0, 5.2) and odd numbered minor versions are development (4.3, 5.1). Therefore, you should consider allowing Gutenprint 5.0 and Gimp-Print 4.2 to be installed concurrently. and * All files and directories with versioned names (e. g. cups-genppdupdate, rastertogutenprint, the PPD files) may be installed concurrently with other versions of Gimp-Print and Gutenprint as described above. Other executables (such as the Canon and Epson back ends, and cups-calibrate) are not versioned, but are not linked against libgutenprint and do not have any other dependencies on Gutenprint. However, the gimp plugin appears problematic: * The GIMP plugin, unlike the core library and the Foomatic and CUPS drivers, may not be installed concurrently with other versions. For example, you may not install both the Gimp-Print 4.2 and the Gutenprint 5.0 version of the Print plugin, as they use different configuration file formats. So, I would suggest: Not shipping a gimp plugin (comment out, but leave in the spec for fc7+), and seeing if you can get this package to not conflict with gimp-print-4.2. The conflicts I see: file /usr/lib/gimp/2.0/plug-ins/print from install of gutenprint-5.0.0- 0.10.fc6 conflicts with file from package gimp-print-plugin-4.2.7-20.1 file /usr/bin/escputil from install of gutenprint-5.0.0-0.10.fc6 conflicts with file from package gimp-print-utils-4.2.7-20.1 file /usr/share/man/man1/escputil.1.gz from install of gutenprint-5.0.0- 0.10.fc6 conflicts with file from package gimp-print-utils-4.2.7-20.1 file /usr/bin/cups-calibrate from install of gutenprint-cups-5.0.0- 0.10.fc6 conflicts with file from package gimp-print-cups-4.2.7-20.1 file /usr/lib/cups/backend/canon from install of gutenprint-cups-5.0.0- 0.10.fc6 conflicts with file from package gimp-print-cups-4.2.7-20.1 file /usr/lib/cups/backend/epson from install of gutenprint-cups-5.0.0- 0.10.fc6 conflicts with file from package gimp-print-cups-4.2.7-20.1 file /usr/lib/cups/filter/commandtocanon from install of gutenprint- cups-5.0.0-0.10.fc6 conflicts with file from package gimp-print-cups-4.2.7-20.1 file /usr/lib/cups/filter/commandtoepson from install of gutenprint- cups-5.0.0-0.10.fc6 conflicts with file from package gimp-print-cups-4.2.7-20.1 file /usr/share/man/man8/cups-calibrate.8.gz from install of gutenprint- cups-5.0.0-0.10.fc6 conflicts with file from package gimp-print-cups-4.2.7-20.1 Perhaps the gutenprint-devel list could tell you how to configure things so gutenprint can work with gimp-print-4.2 already installed? Perhaps the above cups conflicts just need to have a gutenprint- prefix? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 8 05:04:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2006 01:04:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197565] Review Request: buildbot In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609080504.k8854DPf023101@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: buildbot https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197565 ------- Additional Comments From michael at knox.net.nz 2006-09-08 01:04 EST ------- Updated: Spec URL: http://www.knox.net.nz/~michael/buildbot.spec SRPM URL: http://www.knox.net.nz/~michael/buildbot-0.7.4-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 8 05:10:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2006 01:10:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 195223] Review Request: pavucontrol: Volume control for PulseAudio In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609080510.k885AoBU023216@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pavucontrol: Volume control for PulseAudio https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195223 ------- Additional Comments From drzeus-bugzilla at drzeus.cx 2006-09-08 01:10 EST ------- I read that portion of the guidelines as relating to the case of when you have to include a .desktop file yourself (i.e. when upstream doesn't have one). If not, I would have expected a "rm" somewhere in the script to first kill off the .desktop file the Makefiles have installed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 8 05:53:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2006 01:53:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205318] Review Request: perl-Class-MOP - Class::MOP Perl module In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609080553.k885r9eP024350@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Class-MOP - Class::MOP Perl module https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205318 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2006-09-08 01:52 EST ------- BTW the Summary (Class::MOP Perl module) is pretty much useless. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 8 06:56:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2006 02:56:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199108] Review Request: gutenprint: Printer Drivers Package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609080656.k886uLkK026377@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gutenprint: Printer Drivers Package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199108 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at leemhuis.info 2006-09-08 02:56 EST ------- I'm also for the "Lets not ship the gimp plugin for now" route. Maybe we even can get this package as a proper Fedora Core update with the plugin later in FC6 after the package got a bit of testing in Extras. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 8 06:57:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2006 02:57:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203520] Review Request: evolution-brutus In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609080657.k886vQmJ026427@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: evolution-brutus Alias: evolution-brutus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203520 ------- Additional Comments From colding at omesc.com 2006-09-08 02:57 EST ------- Hi, The only change is that I've enabled Autoreq. All issues raised should be fixed now. Spec URL: http://www.omesc.com/content/downloads/dist/Fedora%20Core%206/SPECS/evolution-brutus.spec SRPM URL: http://www.omesc.com/content/downloads/dist/Fedora%20Core%206/SRPMS/evolution-brutus-1.1.6-7.src.rpm Thanks, jules -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 8 08:27:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2006 04:27:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187294] Review Request: gwyddion In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609080827.k888R5Cn032263@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gwyddion https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187294 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-09-08 04:27 EST ------- (In reply to comment #18) > Well, what's for example in /usr/share/cvs/contrib then (or other contrib dirs)? > Mere examples? But they cause cvs -> tcsh dependency. User executables? But > they are not in PATH and they are [cite]REALLY UNSUPORTED[/cite]. Auxiliary > executables? But they are not in libexec and they are not used by anything. > Documentation? But they are not in a documentation directory, and a perl script > is hardly documentation it's something that needs documentation itself. Things > have various modes of use, not everything is black and white. I certainly wouldn't have accepted that kind of packaging without disagreeing. And this is a core package, so there hasn't been any review. But others reviewers may disagree with me, it wouldn't be the first time that it happens ;-). Admitedly, this is not an easy choice, because this is code and doc. > So to get somewhere, what is the scenario under which the current approach > actually breaks? What is the problem users of the current package would > encounter? Or at least, what forbids this mode of use? For the 'internal' modules, plugins dealing with the dump file format will have to require a -devel package. This is not what is done in most cases, it seems to me that it breaks the user expectations. So I think each internal modules should be in a distinct package with the interpreter name in the package name. Alternatively they may be in the main package, but the interpreters should be required. This is not the job of the users to have proper dependencies, it is the packager job. For the plugins, since they are more or less examples, I think that a subpackage containing all of them called gwyddion-plugin-examples which would require all the internal module packages could do the trick. You should anyway add a README file, called for example README.fedora or README.plugins explaining what you said here, something along: "Those plugins are examples of what can be done with plugins, and they all perform the same task. The use of plugins is discouraged, however, so you should use plugins only if you really need to." > I maintain the devel subpackage does not need perl, python nor ruby. It is > however made ready to be used with them *if* one decides so. Someone > implementing a perl script without perl and blaming the packagers for missing > dependencies when it doesn't run is exactly as ridiculous as someone writing an > TeX document without TeX and blaming the packagers for missing dependencies when > it doesn't compile to DVI. The internal modules and the plugins are not something done by users but shipped by pakckagers, so you, as a packager must ensure that the dependencies are met. > By python I referred to `python': > > $ rpm -ql python | grep '\.py$' | grep -c ^/usr/share > 0 > $ rpm -ql python | grep '\.py$' | grep -c ^/usr/lib64 > 550 Ok, that's because these are arch dependent modules. But look at the python modules in /usr/lib/python2.4, these are the noarch modules. Arch independent files should not be in arch-dependent dirs. You can prefer /usr/lib/something on 386 and x64, rather than /usr/share, like what is done for noarch python and perl packages, but don't put them in an arch-dependent directory. The case of your package is really different from the python case. python is an interpreter written in C, with many modules written in C, so arch dependent. Admitedly arch dependent part of a module may be mixed up with arch independent part of the same module, but noarch modules are in a distinct place. > I tried it before and the key word is `some'. There is more than 20x more .py > files in lib64 than in share on my system (some are indirectly arch-dependent, > but anyway). These are arch-dependent python modules. The gwyddion module is noarch and isn't a python module, it is an internal module. > It is not a problem to put the modules to %{_datadir} instead of %{_libdir}. I > just think one has to have a reason to deviate from upstream. And I cannot see > the reason when the consistency gain is only virtual. Arch independent files should not be in an arch-dependent directory. The FHS isn't very clear about where those files should be, but it shouldn't be in lib64: "/usr/lib performs the same role as /usr/lib for an alternate binary format, except that the symbolic links /usr/lib/sendmail and /usr/lib/X11 are not required. [26]" /usr/lib (for all the arches) and /usr/share seems to me to be possible places. I have checked what is currently done on my computer, and all the internal perl modules are in %_datadir, except one, which is arch-dependent. There are also more internal python modules in %_datadir, but I didn't checked whether all the ones in /usr/lib are all arch-dependent or not. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 8 08:46:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2006 04:46:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187294] Review Request: gwyddion In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609080846.k888kxSl001471@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gwyddion https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187294 ------- Additional Comments From yeti at physics.muni.cz 2006-09-08 04:46 EST ------- (In reply to comment #20) > The internal modules and the plugins are not something done by users but > shipped by pakckagers, so you, as a packager must ensure that the > dependencies are met. The dependencies are always met. Any 3rd party perl plug-in requires perl itself as any other perl script does. Any 3rd party python plug-in requires python itself, etc. The dependency chain is plug-in -> gwyddion, perl not plug-in -> gwyddion -> perl Anyway, I did some less controversial changes meanwhile: Spec URI: http://gwyddion.net/download/test/gwyddion.spec SRPM URI: http://gwyddion.net/download/test/gwyddion-1.99.9-3.src.rpm * Fri Sep 08 2006 David Necas (Yeti) - 1.99.9-3 - Moved auxiliary plug-in modues to libs subpackage to fix dependency of modules on devel - Added gwyddion.vim to devel as documentation -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 8 09:32:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2006 05:32:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187294] Review Request: gwyddion In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609080932.k889WGYR004423@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gwyddion https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187294 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-09-08 05:32 EST ------- (In reply to comment #21) > (In reply to comment #20) > The dependencies are always met. Any 3rd party perl plug-in requires perl > itself as any other perl script does. Any 3rd party python plug-in requires > python itself, etc. Indeed this should be the case, but the gwyddion internal modules requires the interpreter, so they should pull it in. > The dependency chain is > > plug-in -> gwyddion, perl > > not > > plug-in -> gwyddion -> perl Not quite. The dependency chain is plug-in -> gwyddion 'internal' module usefull externally, unfortunately not packaged as a normal perl module -> perl Otherwise, you can simplify the spec file by having %{_libexecdir}/%{name}/ in the %files section of the subpackage that holds the plugins. Indeed nothing under %{pkglibexecdir}/ is needed in other subpackage. The files section for doc may also be simplified to %doc %{_datadir}/gtk-doc/html/ and you can drop the %define gtkdocdir %{_datadir}/gtk-doc/html similarly, you can have %{_datadir}/%{name}/ in -libs and %{_includedir}/%{name}/ in -devel and drop the corresponding defines. Other simplifications using the same trick are also possible, like %{pkglibdir}/ruby/ instead of %{pkglibdir}/ruby/gwyddion/* %dir %{pkglibdir}/ruby/gwyddion %dir %{pkglibdir}/ruby and %{pkglibdir}/modules/ %dir %{pkglibdir} for the whole %files modules section, and other you can find by yourself. If you prefer to keep the extensive list, I have nothing against it, both approaches have merits and faults. Indeed a short list is more readable, while an extensive list allows to know when something changed. However, you should replace everywhere things like %{pkglibdir}/python/Gwyddion/* %dir %{pkglibdir}/python/Gwyddion by the equivalent and simpler %{pkglibdir}/python/Gwyddion/ (note the the trailing / is optional, but it helps a lot since it shows that it is a directory). Another comment, it seems to me that gwyddion-doc shouldn't own %{_datadir}/gtk-doc/ but it issems to be casually done by other packages, so it may be kept as is. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 8 09:34:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2006 05:34:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205504] Review Request: rum - rug-like interface for yum In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609080934.k889YtNP004676@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rum - rug-like interface for yum https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205504 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2006-09-08 05:34 EST ------- ** I've seen you have updated the src.rpm Next time, do update the release version as well. ** %defattr(-,root,root,-) %defattr(-,root,root) Duplicates ** chitlesh(rum-1.0.0-1)[0]$rpmlint /home/chitlesh/rpmbuild/SRPMS/rum-1.0.0-1.src.rpm W: rum summary-not-capitalized rum is a rug-like interface for yum Capitalized the "R" of "rum" E: rum description-line-too-long rum is a rug-like interface for yum (Yellow dog Updater, Modified). rug is the command-line frontend for rcd (Red Carpet Daemon). Divide it into 2 lines ** /usr/bin/install -c -m 644 'i18n.py' '/var/tmp/rum-1.0.0-1-root-chitlesh/usr/share/rum/i18n.py' /usr/bin/install -c -m 644 'rumcommand.py' '/var/tmp/rum-1.0.0-1-root-chitlesh/usr/share/rum/rumcommand.py' /usr/bin/install -c -m 644 'rummain.py' '/var/tmp/rum-1.0.0-1-root-chitlesh/usr/share/rum/rummain.py' preserves the files' timestamps make INSTALL="install -p" install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT ** Like Brian said : the Source should be a full url. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 8 10:14:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2006 06:14:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187294] Review Request: gwyddion In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609081014.k88AEheu007862@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gwyddion https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187294 ------- Additional Comments From yeti at physics.muni.cz 2006-09-08 06:14 EST ------- (In reply to comment #22) > Indeed this should be the case, but the gwyddion internal > modules requires the interpreter, so they should pull it in. The presence or absence of the interpreters has absolutely no effect of the function of the main package. So how it comes it requires it? It starts having an effect only after you add something else -- that however requires the appropriate interpreter itself. > Not quite. The dependency chain is > > plug-in -> gwyddion 'internal' module usefull externally, > unfortunately not packaged as a normal perl module -> perl Do you mean mean a perl script requires perl indirectly via modules it uses? Does it imply if a perl script uses no modules it does not require perl? The direct plug-in -> perl dependency obviously exists, so listing it elsewhere down the chain is redundant. > Otherwise, you can simplify the spec file by having > ... Well, I prefer the explicit form. Also if installed directories contain files, I prefer %{pkglibdir}/somedir/* %dir %{pkglibdir}/somedir to %{pkglibdir}/somedir/ as the former fails when nothing gets installed to somedir by accident while the latter happily packages empty directory. > Another comment, it seems to me that gwyddion-doc shouldn't own > %{_datadir}/gtk-doc/ > but it issems to be casually done by other packages, so it may be > kept as is. This surfaced on FE list more than once, but I don't recall any good solution. The directory is primarily owned by gtk-doc, but Requires: gtk-doc is wrong because the documentation is already compiled to HTML and does not require gtk-doc. Requires: %{_datadir}/gtk-doc is wrong for the same reason (could be fixed by adding it to filesystem or a similar base package). So AFAIK all packages that own subdirectories of this directory currently own it too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 8 11:03:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2006 07:03:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205031] Review Request: python-telepathy - Python libraries for Telepathy In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609081103.k88B3IA6010705@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-telepathy - Python libraries for Telepathy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205031 sander at hoentjen.eu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |sander at hoentjen.eu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From sander at hoentjen.eu 2006-09-08 07:03 EST ------- GOOD - package meets naming and packaging guidelines. - specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. - dist tag is present. - build root is correct. - license field matches the actual license. - license is open source-compatible. License text included in package. - source files match upstream: 39a07295c78699da6efc1e4638c53688 - BuildRequires are proper. - package builds in mock (x86_64). - rpmlint is silent. - final provides and requires are sane: python-telepathy-0.13.2-1.fc6.noarch.rpm python-telepathy = 0.13.2-1.fc6 = python(abi) = 2.4 - no shared libraries are present. - package is not relocatable. - owns the directories it creates. - doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. - no duplicates in %files. - file permissions are appropriate. - %clean is present. - no scriptlets present. - code, not content. - documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. - %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. - no headers. - no pkgconfig files. - no libtool .la droppings. - not a GUI app. - not a web app. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 8 11:12:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2006 07:12:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204417] Review Request: telepathy-gabble - A Jabber/XMPP connection manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609081112.k88BCS13011246@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: telepathy-gabble - A Jabber/XMPP connection manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204417 sander at hoentjen.eu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |sander at hoentjen.eu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From sander at hoentjen.eu 2006-09-08 07:12 EST ------- Ok, I am approving this package with the note: - doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. I was wrong there. It does own a dir that it shouldn't, and that will be dealt with as soon as the first other telepatthy connection manager will be packaged. Since there are none at the moment I will approve now -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 8 11:23:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2006 07:23:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205136] Review Request: gg2 - GNU Gadu 2 - free talking In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609081123.k88BNhrP012053@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gg2 - GNU Gadu 2 - free talking https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205136 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-09-08 07:23 EST ------- I cannot rebuild this in mock: checking for X11/extensions/scrnsaver.h... yes checking for GTK... yes checking for DBUS... no configure: error: DBUS_PKG_ERRORS error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.38783 (%build) RPM build errors: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.38783 (%build) config.log says: configure:34077: checking for DBUS configure:34085: $PKG_CONFIG --exists --print-errors "dbus-1 dbus-glib-1" Package dbus-glib-1 was not found in the pkg-config search path. Perhaps you should add the directory containing `dbus-glib-1.pc' to the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable No package 'dbus-glib-1' found configure:34088: $? = 1 configure:34103: $PKG_CONFIG --exists --print-errors "dbus-1 dbus-glib-1" Package dbus-glib-1 was not found in the pkg-config search path. Perhaps you should add the directory containing `dbus-glib-1.pc' to the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable No package 'dbus-glib-1' found configure:34106: $? = 1 No package 'dbus-glib-1' found configure:34134: result: no configure:34147: error: DBUS_PKG_ERRORS -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 8 11:45:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2006 07:45:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203520] Review Request: evolution-brutus In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609081145.k88Bjhr5013912@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: evolution-brutus Alias: evolution-brutus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203520 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-09-08 07:45 EST ------- Hi. Well, ORBit2 on FC5 is now 2.14.0-1. So this package still cannot be rebuilt on FC5 (with full updates). If this package really requires ORBit2 >= 2.14.1, then you have to ask for FC ORBit2 maintainer to upgrade FC5 ORBit2 ??? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 8 11:53:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2006 07:53:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203520] Review Request: evolution-brutus In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609081153.k88BrmEG014415@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: evolution-brutus Alias: evolution-brutus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203520 ------- Additional Comments From colding at omesc.com 2006-09-08 07:53 EST ------- Hi, Yes, it really requires >=2.14.1. OK, I'll ask the maintainer but I'm really aiming more at inclusion in FC6 extras. BTW, you can get ORBit2-2.14.1 and libIDL-0.8.7 for FC5 here: http://www.omesc.com/content/downloads/dist/Fedora%20Core%205/SRPMS/ORBit2-2.14.1-omc.1.src.rpm http://www.omesc.com/content/downloads/dist/Fedora%20Core%205/SRPMS/libIDL-0.8.7-omc.1.src.rpm Best regards, jules -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 8 11:55:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2006 07:55:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203520] Review Request: evolution-brutus In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609081155.k88BtQrM014543@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: evolution-brutus Alias: evolution-brutus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203520 ------- Additional Comments From sander at hoentjen.eu 2006-09-08 07:55 EST ------- Also you use $RPM_BUILD_ROOT and %{buildroot} Just pick one of those and use it always for consistency -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 8 12:11:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2006 08:11:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205755] New: Review Request: elsa - manages group of processes and allows accounting Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205755 Summary: Review Request: elsa - manages group of processes and allows accounting Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: guillaume.thouvenin at bull.net QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.bullopensource.org/elsa-srpm/elsa.spec SRPM URL: http://www.bullopensource.org/elsa-srpm/elsa-1.3.0-2.src.rpm Description: The goal of ELSA (Enhanced Linux System Accounting) is to be able to know how ressources are used by a group of processes. ELSA is based on BSD Process Accounting to get information about the use of ressources. We also need to be able to manage groups of processes as it's clear that a major accounting improvement is the per-job accounting. I don't know if "job" is the right noun. The property needed here is that if a process is in a container (group of processes), its children will be in the same container. In this project we propose a user space solution for managing groups of processes. Therefore, most of the enhanced accounting will be done in user space. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 8 12:20:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2006 08:20:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203520] Review Request: evolution-brutus In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609081220.k88CKHt6015841@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: evolution-brutus Alias: evolution-brutus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203520 ------- Additional Comments From colding at omesc.com 2006-09-08 08:20 EST ------- Done. New packages here: Spec URL: http://www.omesc.com/content/downloads/dist/Fedora%20Core%206/SPECS/evolution-brutus.spec SRPM URL: http://www.omesc.com/content/downloads/dist/Fedora%20Core%206/SRPMS/evolution-brutus-1.1.6-8.src.rpm Thanks, jules -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 8 12:24:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2006 08:24:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205343] Review Request: cohoba - Cohoba is a GNOME interface for Telepathy. It aims to be innovative and simple In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609081224.k88CObmr016122@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cohoba - Cohoba is a GNOME interface for Telepathy. It aims to be innovative and simple https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205343 ------- Additional Comments From sander at hoentjen.eu 2006-09-08 08:24 EST ------- Spec URL: http://fedora.hoentjen.eu/telepathy/cohoba.spec SRPM URL: http://fedora.hoentjen.eu/telepathy/cohoba-0.0.3-2.src.rpm added gnome-python2-applet to requires, gnome-python2 will get pulled in as a dep -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 8 12:36:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2006 08:36:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199108] Review Request: gutenprint: Printer Drivers Package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609081236.k88Ca8Vp016878@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gutenprint: Printer Drivers Package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199108 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-09-08 08:36 EST ------- For time-being, here is the update which is based on following text from README * Gutenprint permits installation of Gimp-Print 4.2 alongside Gutenprint 5.0, and in the future will permit concurrent installation of different stable versions of Gutenprint with different minor version numbers. Gutenprint uses the old-style kernel numbering system, whereby even numbered minor versions are stable (4.2, 5.0, 5.2) and odd numbered minor versions are development (4.3, 5.1). Therefore, you should consider allowing Gutenprint 5.0 and Gimp-Print 4.2 to be installed concurrently. For CUPS sub-package ===> "Installing the CUPS driver for Gutenprint 5.0 will not interfere with your ability to continue using the Gimp-Print 4.2 CUPS driver." AND * All files and directories with versioned names (e. g. cups-genppdupdate, rastertogutenprint, the PPD files) may be installed concurrently with other versions of Gimp-Print and Gutenprint as described above. Other executables (such as the Canon and Epson back ends, and cups-calibrate) are not versioned, but are not linked against libgutenprint and do not have any other dependencies on Gutenprint. For plugin sub-package which is disabled in SPEC becuase of ===> However, the gimp plugin appears problematic: * The GIMP plugin, unlike the core library and the Foomatic and CUPS drivers, may not be installed concurrently with other versions. For example, you may not install both the Gimp-Print 4.2 and the Gutenprint 5.0 version of the Print plugin, as they use different configuration file formats. I have disabled all conflicting files to be installed. Updated package have same versioning Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/pnemade/gutenprint/gutenprint.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/pnemade/gutenprint/gutenprint-5.0.0-0.11.fc6.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 8 12:47:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2006 08:47:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 195223] Review Request: pavucontrol: Volume control for PulseAudio In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609081247.k88Cl4X4017827@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pavucontrol: Volume control for PulseAudio https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195223 ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at ameritech.net 2006-09-08 08:47 EST ------- You would simply add something like: desktop-file-install --vendor fedora --delete-original \ --dir $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/applications \ --add-category X-Fedora \ $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/applications/%{name}.desktop to the install section of your spec file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 8 13:09:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2006 09:09:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 195223] Review Request: pavucontrol: Volume control for PulseAudio In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609081309.k88D9Zwd020013@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pavucontrol: Volume control for PulseAudio https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195223 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |rdieter at math.unl.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-09-08 09:09 EST ------- So that the .desktop file (name) doesn't vary from upstream, I'd suggest using: --vendor="" instead. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 8 13:14:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2006 09:14:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 195223] Review Request: pavucontrol: Volume control for PulseAudio In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609081314.k88DE3lg020308@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pavucontrol: Volume control for PulseAudio https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195223 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-09-08 09:14 EST ------- spec looks clean,simple, just * MUST: add to %install section desktop-file-install \ --dir $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/applications \ --add-category="X-Fedora" --vendor="" \ $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/applications/%{name}.desktop do that, and pending my confirmation for building in mock and rpmlint sanity checking, I'll APPROVE this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 8 13:22:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2006 09:22:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205343] Review Request: cohoba - Cohoba is a GNOME interface for Telepathy. It aims to be innovative and simple In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609081322.k88DM4WG020623@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cohoba - Cohoba is a GNOME interface for Telepathy. It aims to be innovative and simple https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205343 bdpepple at ameritech.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |bdpepple at ameritech.net OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at ameritech.net 2006-09-08 09:22 EST ------- I'll do a review on this later today. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 8 13:45:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2006 09:45:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202901] Review Request: pgFouine - PostgreSQL log analyzer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609081345.k88DjlkJ021939@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pgFouine - PostgreSQL log analyzer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202901 ------- Additional Comments From devrim at commandprompt.com 2006-09-08 09:45 EST ------- Based on the comments above, here are the new files: Spec URL: http://developer.postgresql.org/~devrim/rpms/other/pgfouine/pgfouine.spec SRPM URL: http://developer.postgresql.org/~devrim/rpms/other/pgfouine/pgfouine-0.7-4.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 8 13:52:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2006 09:52:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205031] Review Request: python-telepathy - Python libraries for Telepathy In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609081352.k88DqU2M022295@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-telepathy - Python libraries for Telepathy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205031 bdpepple at ameritech.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 8 13:52:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2006 09:52:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205343] Review Request: cohoba - Cohoba is a GNOME interface for Telepathy. It aims to be innovative and simple In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609081352.k88DqiOr022339@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cohoba - Cohoba is a GNOME interface for Telepathy. It aims to be innovative and simple https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205343 Bug 205343 depends on bug 205031, which changed state. Bug 205031 Summary: Review Request: python-telepathy - Python libraries for Telepathy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205031 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 8 13:58:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2006 09:58:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202901] Review Request: pgFouine - PostgreSQL log analyzer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609081358.k88Dwpvq022689@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pgFouine - PostgreSQL log analyzer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202901 ------- Additional Comments From guillaume.smet at gmail.com 2006-09-08 09:58 EST ------- Here is the details of what we fixed and how we fixed it in the spec/src.rpm Devrim just posted (0.7-4): > * Source does not match upstream tarball. It was an error of mine when I sent the first tarball to Devrim. It's now fixed - the src.rpm contains a vanilla 0.7 release. > * Macros are used everywhere except in the patch file. We use a sed command in the %prep as you suggest it. > * INSTALL is not needed in the package as it doesn't give any information that > would be relevant to someone who installed via the rpm. ChangeLog could go > in but that depends on how useful you think it will be to users of the > package. INSTALL removed, ChangeLog added - it can be useful to check if a problem has been solved in the parser. > * Why are the tests installed into %{_datadir}/pgfouine? Are they necessary > for the package to run? If not, they should be installed to %doc (if they > are useful for the user to know how to run the programs) or left out. They are useless for the user. We removed them. > Cosmetic: > * There's no need to check that the buildroot is not "/" before rm'ing it > because you are already setting the buildroot in the spec file. So: > [ "%{buildroot}" != "/" ] && rm -rf %{buildroot} > can be reduced to: > rm -rf %{buildroot} Fixed. > * I favor more verbose Changelog entries. Since the previous reviewing > occurred on IRC rather than bugzilla, it would be especially nice > (When in bugzilla, you can reference the bugzilla number; when on IRC, things > can get lost.) OK. We will take that into account. Regards, -- Guillaume -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 8 14:02:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2006 10:02:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177105] Review Request: gnomeradio - Graphical FM-Tuner program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609081402.k88E2lMR022819@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnomeradio - Graphical FM-Tuner program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177105 rpm at greysector.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2006-09-08 10:02 EST ------- Thanks for the review. I removed the pkgconfig BR, because it's redundant on FC5 as well. Package imported and built for devel, FC-5 branch requested. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 8 14:33:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2006 10:33:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193896] Review Request: libreadline-java - Java wrapper for the GNU-readline library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609081433.k88EXhLi024811@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libreadline-java - Java wrapper for the GNU-readline library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193896 ------- Additional Comments From ifoox at redhat.com 2006-09-08 10:33 EST ------- New files: http://people.redhat.com/ifoox/extras/libreadline-java-0.8.0-11.src.rpm http://people.redhat.com/ifoox/extras/libreadline-java.spec (In reply to comment #6) > Hmm, this builds but will not install on current rawhide: > > Error: Missing Dependency: readline = 5.0 is needed by package libreadline-java > > Rawhide has readline 5.1; I changed readline_ver to match and it seems to be OK. Fixed. > Also, there are a few rpmlint warnings; I think it now checks for more than it > did when I first looked at this package. > > W: libreadline-java macro-in-%changelog _jnidir > W: libreadline-java macro-in-%changelog _libdir > You need to double any percent symbols that appear in the changelog, lest > they be expanded in the final RPM. Fixed. > E: libreadline-java no-cleaning-of-buildroot > You need rpm -rf %{buildroot} at the beginning of %install. Fixed. > W: libreadline-java mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs > It's complaining about a couple of tabs after Group: (use "less -U" to see > them). This isn't a blocker. Fixed. > The debuginfo package is now missing the source again. I'm at a loss as to why > this is continually a problem, but it's not really a blocker. Perhaps some day > someone will actually understand what's going on here. Hopefully. :-) > You need to include COPYING.LIB as %doc. Fixed. > Shouldn't the jar file go in /usr/share/java? If not, nothing in your > dependency chain owns /usr/lib/java. You are right, I'm not sure why it was in /usr/lib/java. Fixed. > * source files match upstream: > 501720ddded45eaedf429b7cc356107c libreadline-java-0.8.0-src.tar.gz > X package meets naming and packaging guidelines (non-numeric release bits). > * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. > X dist tag is present. Fixed. > * build root is correct. > * license field matches the actual license. > * license is open source-compatible. > X license text upstream but not included in package. > * latest version is being packaged. > * BuildRequires are proper. > * compiler flags are appropriate. > * %clean is present. > * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). > ? debuginfo package looks complete. > X rpmlint has valid complaints > X final provides and requires are sane: > libreadline-java = 0.8.0-10jpp_3fc > = > X readline = 5.0 > /sbin/ldconfig > java-gcj-compat >= 1.0.31 > /bin/sh > * %check is not present; no test suite upstream. > * a shared library is present and ldconfig is called properly. > * package is not relocatable. > ? owns the directories it creates. > * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. > * no duplicates in %files. > * file permissions are appropriate. > * scriptlets OK (ldconfig, gcj-db) > * code, not content. > * javadocs split out into separate jackage. > * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. > * no headers. > * no pkgconfig files. > * no libtool .la droppings. > * unversioned .so in -devel subpackage. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 8 15:03:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2006 11:03:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205321] Review Request: perl-Moose - Complete modern object system for Perl 5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609081503.k88F3o5A026800@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Moose - Complete modern object system for Perl 5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205321 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 8 15:12:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2006 11:12:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202006] Review Request: fmio - FM radio card manipulation utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609081512.k88FC4DK027555@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fmio - FM radio card manipulation utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202006 andy at smile.org.ua changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From andy at smile.org.ua 2006-09-08 11:12 EST ------- Thanks for review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 8 16:12:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2006 12:12:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205798] New: Review Request: xine-lib - The Xine library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205798 Summary: Review Request: xine-lib - The Xine library Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: gauret at free.fr QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://gauret.free.fr/fichiers/rpms/fedora/xine-lib.spec SRPM URL: http://gauret.free.fr/fichiers/rpms/fedora/xine-lib-1.1.2-12.src.rpm Description: This package contains the Xine library. Xine is a free multimedia player. It can play back various media. It also decodes multimedia files from local disk drives, and displays multimedia streamed over the Internet. It interprets many of the most common multimedia formats available - and some of the most uncommon formats, too. Non-default rpmbuild options: --without imagemagick: Disable ImageMagick support --with directfb: Enable DirectFB support -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 8 16:16:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2006 12:16:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 174883] Review Request: distcc -- A free distributed C/C++ compiler system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609081616.k88GGkZN031231@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: distcc -- A free distributed C/C++ compiler system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174883 ------- Additional Comments From ch.nolte at fh-wolfenbuettel.de 2006-09-08 12:16 EST ------- The latest spec-file http://ensc.de/fedora/distcc/distcc-2.18.3-1.8.fc5x.src.rpm can not be built under a FC5 system because of the fedora-usermgmt-devel requirement. According to http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageUserCreation there could be a workaround for systems which do not provide the usermgmt requirement (section 'Alternatives'). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 8 16:25:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2006 12:25:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205321] Review Request: perl-Moose - Complete modern object system for Perl 5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609081625.k88GPfMZ031816@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Moose - Complete modern object system for Perl 5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205321 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-09-08 12:25 EST ------- Everything looks good with the new perl-DateTime-Format-MySQL package that you pushed. * source files match upstream: 2357e2a18025f62d9068766298e7bbc6 Moose-0.12.tar.gz * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * dist tag is present. * build root is correct. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. License text not included upstream. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: perl(Moose) = 0.12 perl(Moose::Meta::Attribute) = 0.06 perl(Moose::Meta::Class) = 0.07 perl(Moose::Meta::Instance) = 0.01 perl(Moose::Meta::Method::Overriden) = 0.01 perl(Moose::Meta::Role) = 0.04 perl(Moose::Meta::Role::Method) = 0.01 perl(Moose::Meta::TypeCoercion) = 0.01 perl(Moose::Meta::TypeConstraint) = 0.04 perl(Moose::Meta::TypeConstraint::Union) = 0.01 perl(Moose::Object) = 0.06 perl(Moose::Role) = 0.05 perl(Moose::Util::TypeConstraints) = 0.07 perl-Moose = 0.12-1.fc6 = perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8) perl(B) perl(Carp) perl(Class::MOP) perl(Moose) perl(Moose::Meta::Attribute) perl(Moose::Meta::Class) perl(Moose::Meta::Instance) perl(Moose::Meta::Role) perl(Moose::Meta::TypeCoercion) perl(Moose::Meta::TypeConstraint) perl(Moose::Object) perl(Moose::Util::TypeConstraints) perl(Scalar::Util) perl(Sub::Exporter) perl(Sub::Name) perl(UNIVERSAL::require) perl(base) perl(metaclass) perl(strict) perl(warnings) * %check is present and all tests pass: All tests successful, 1 test skipped. Files=60, Tests=1543, 10 wallclock secs ( 8.03 cusr + 1.25 csys = 9.28 CPU) (one skipped test due to a prerequisite which cannot be packaged for extras) * package is not relocatable. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 8 16:37:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2006 12:37:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205321] Review Request: perl-Moose - Complete modern object system for Perl 5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609081637.k88GbL1p032698@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Moose - Complete modern object system for Perl 5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205321 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-09-08 12:37 EST ------- +Import to CVS +Add to owners.list +Bump release, build for devel +devel build succeeds +Request branching (FC-5) +Close bug Thanks for the review! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 8 16:45:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2006 12:45:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192418] Review Request: xbae - Xbae widget set In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609081645.k88Gj2SP000600@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xbae - Xbae widget set https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192418 ------- Additional Comments From jamatos at fc.up.pt 2006-09-08 12:45 EST ------- Review for release 3: * RPM name is OK * Source xbae-4.60.4.tar.gz is the same as upstream * This is the latest version * Builds fine in mock * rpmlint of xbae looks OK * rpmlint of xbae-devel looks OK * File list of xbae looks OK * File list of xbae-devel looks OK * License is OK (BSD), text in %doc, matches source * Spec is readable and written in American English * no missing BR * no unnecessary BR Notes: Any reason for Obsoletes: Xbae < %{version}-%{release} -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 8 17:12:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2006 13:12:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204421] Review Request: kdetv - KDE application for watching TV In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609081712.k88HCT26002004@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdetv - KDE application for watching TV https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204421 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-09-08 13:12 EST ------- Built fine in mock, rpmlint is mostly harmless: $rpmlint kdetv-0.8.9-3.fc6.i386.rpm E: kdetv script-without-shellbang /usr/lib/kde3/kdetv_tomsmocomp.la E: kdetv script-without-shellbang /usr/lib/kde3/kdetv_chromakill.la E: kdetv script-without-shellbang /usr/lib/kde3/kdetv_v4l.la E: kdetv script-without-shellbang /usr/lib/kde3/kdetv_xmlchannels.la W: kdetv dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/sv/kdetv/common ../common E: kdetv script-without-shellbang /usr/lib/kde3/kdetv_mirror.la E: kdetv script-without-shellbang /usr/lib/kde3/kdetv_overscan.la E: kdetv script-without-shellbang /usr/lib/kde3/kdetv_colourinversion.la E: kdetv script-without-shellbang /usr/lib/kde3/kdetv_xv.la E: kdetv script-without-shellbang /usr/lib/kde3/kdetv_simon.la W: kdetv dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/nl/kdetv/common ../common E: kdetv script-without-shellbang /usr/lib/kde3/kdetv_bilinear.la E: kdetv script-without-shellbang /usr/lib/libkvideoio.la E: kdetv script-without-shellbang /usr/lib/kde3/kdetv_haze.la E: kdetv script-without-shellbang /usr/lib/kde3/kdetv_libzvbidecoder.la E: kdetv script-without-shellbang /usr/lib/kde3/kdetv_elegant.la E: kdetv script-without-shellbang /usr/lib/libkdetv.la E: kdetv script-without-shellbang /usr/lib/kde3/kdetv_kwintvchannels.la W: kdetv dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/et/kdetv/common ../common E: kdetv script-without-shellbang /usr/lib/kde3/kdetv_greedyh.la E: kdetv script-without-shellbang /usr/lib/kde3/kdetv_v4l2.la E: kdetv script-without-shellbang /usr/lib/kde3/kdetv_xawtvchannels.la E: kdetv script-without-shellbang /usr/lib/kde3/kdetv_none.la E: kdetv script-without-shellbang /usr/lib/kde3/kdetv_zappingchannels.la W: kdetv devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/libkdetvvideo.so E: kdetv script-without-shellbang /usr/lib/kde3/kdetv_linearblend.la W: kdetv dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/da/kdetv/common ../common E: kdetv script-without-shellbang /usr/lib/libkdetvvideo.la E: kdetv script-without-shellbang /usr/lib/kde3/kdetv_oss.la E: kdetv script-without-shellbang /usr/lib/kde3/kdetv_greedy2frame.la W: kdetv dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/fr/kdetv/common ../common W: kdetv devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/libkdetv.so W: kdetv dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/pt/kdetv/common ../common W: kdetv dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/kdetv/common ../common W: kdetv dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/ru/kdetv/common ../common E: kdetv script-without-shellbang /usr/lib/kde3/kdetv_sharpness.la E: kdetv script-without-shellbang /usr/lib/kde3/kdetv_telex.la W: kdetv dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/it/kdetv/common ../common E: kdetv script-without-shellbang /usr/lib/kde3/kdetv_greedy.la W: kdetv devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/libkvideoio.so E: kdetv script-without-shellbang /usr/lib/kde3/kdetv_channelsuite.la E: kdetv script-without-shellbang /usr/lib/kde3/kdetv_csvchannels.la You can omit: BuildRequires: libXext-devel since that's already pulled in by qt-devel. Else, looks good, APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 8 17:17:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2006 13:17:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205798] Review Request: xine-lib - The Xine library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609081717.k88HHh61002326@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xine-lib - The Xine library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205798 ville.skytta at iki.fi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|ville.skytta at iki.fi | BugsThisDependsOn| |182235 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2006-09-08 13:17 EST ------- This probably needs an ack from legal before it makes much sense to spend time on a review -> adding blocker on FE-Legal. (Removing explicit Cc to me, I already receive the traffic through the fedora-package-review list.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 8 17:28:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2006 13:28:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205798] Review Request: xine-lib - The Xine library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609081728.k88HSVJ8003035@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xine-lib - The Xine library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205798 ------- Additional Comments From dennis at ausil.us 2006-09-08 13:28 EST ------- as with other media packages you will need to use a modified tarball with all of the patented codec support removed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 8 17:38:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2006 13:38:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205798] Review Request: xine-lib - The Xine library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609081738.k88Hc3Z4003947@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xine-lib - The Xine library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205798 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn|182235 | OtherBugsDependingO| |182235 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 8 17:40:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2006 13:40:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205798] Review Request: xine-lib - The Xine library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609081740.k88He3cF004192@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xine-lib - The Xine library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205798 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2006-09-08 13:39 EST ------- That is already done, see comments in the specfile. I think a legal ack is needed nevertheless. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 8 17:41:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2006 13:41:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197417] Review Request: php-pear-Validate - PEAR: Validation class In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609081741.k88Hfb1D004340@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Validate - PEAR: Validation class Alias: php-pear-Validate https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197417 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |tibbs at math.uh.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 8 17:52:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2006 13:52:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 174883] Review Request: distcc -- A free distributed C/C++ compiler system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609081752.k88Hqdaa004975@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: distcc -- A free distributed C/C++ compiler system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174883 ------- Additional Comments From ch.nolte at fh-wolfenbuettel.de 2006-09-08 13:52 EST ------- It seems that 'fedora-usermgmt-devel' should be 'fedora-usermgmt' -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 8 17:54:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2006 13:54:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205798] Review Request: xine-lib - The Xine library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609081754.k88HsuT9005099@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xine-lib - The Xine library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205798 ------- Additional Comments From dennis at ausil.us 2006-09-08 13:54 EST ------- Source0: http://download.sourceforge.net/xine/%{name}-%{version}.tar.bz2 Patch4: xine-lib-1.1.2-new-ffmpeg.patch doesn't look like it I see the comment in %prep it should be up with the sources. # The tarball is generated from the upstream tarball using # the script in SOURCE1. It prunes potentially patented code comment should be moved and id have a guess that the ffmpeg patch dropped -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 8 18:26:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2006 14:26:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193897] Review Request: mysql-connector-java - Official JDBC driver for MySQL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609081826.k88IQsQH007406@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mysql-connector-java - Official JDBC driver for MySQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193897 ------- Additional Comments From green at redhat.com 2006-09-08 14:26 EST ------- One final thing and this is APPROVED. See the line starting in 'X'. Also, why are you packaging version 3.1.12 when the most recent version is 5something. We normally require that the most recent version be packaged. * package meets and packaging guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. X dist tag is not present. Add %{?dist} to Release tag. * build root is correct. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * License text included in package. * source files match upstream (although they are modified to remove binary jars. upstream makes no source only release). ? latest version is not being packaged. Upstream is at version 5. Why aren't we packaging version 5? * BuildRequires are proper. * package builds in mock. * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane mysql-connector-java-3.1.12-1jpp_4fc.i386.rpm ========= mm.mysql mysql-connector-java-3.1.12.jar.so mysql-connector-java = 1:3.1.12-1jpp_4fc = java-gcj-compat >= 1.0.31 jta >= 1.0 log4j * shared libraries are present, but no ldconfig required. * package is not relocatable. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * %clean is present. * %check is not present * scriptlets OK * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no libtool .la droppings. * not a GUI app (no .desktop file required). * not a web app. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 8 18:54:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2006 14:54:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205620] Fedora Extras: Package Review Request: buildos In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609081854.k88IshZe009824@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Fedora Extras: Package Review Request: buildos https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205620 ------- Additional Comments From dchapman at redhat.com 2006-09-08 14:54 EST ------- Prarit, FYI, the help for buildos shows an argument called --productversion however the code appears to actually use --version. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 8 19:05:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2006 15:05:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199108] Review Request: gutenprint: Printer Drivers Package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609081905.k88J5jCS010433@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gutenprint: Printer Drivers Package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199108 ------- Additional Comments From moe at blagblagblag.org 2006-09-08 15:05 EST ------- >From the gutenprint front page: "Gutenprint was formerly called Gimp-Print." This program has had a change of name in version 5.0. I have a feeling if it had simply kept it's old name, we'd just drop gimp-print 4.2.x and upgrade gimp-print to version 5.0. That's all this essentially is. Yes, you can install them side-by-side, simply because it's a major upgrade (think: installing OOo1 & OOo2 at the same time). It seems to me that this isn't really an /extras/ package conflicting with a /core/ package, it's a /core/ package which has seen major improvements and now has a new name. I hope we don't get stuck with the old printing capabilities of gimp due to this... We didn't keep phoenix in parallel just because it was renamed firefox (by way of hypothetical example)... My two pence. :) /me out -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 8 20:08:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2006 16:08:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197417] Review Request: php-pear-Validate - PEAR: Validation class In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609082008.k88K8iRA014962@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Validate - PEAR: Validation class Alias: php-pear-Validate https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197417 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-09-08 16:08 EST ------- * source files match upstream: 70be4bfc7cf759e3451fb4f8faf251cb Validate-0.6.4.tgz * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * dist tag is present. * build root is correct. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. License text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * rpmlint is silent (except for the bogus warning) * final provides and requires are sane: php-pear(Validate) = 0.6.4 php-pear-Validate = 0.6.4-1.fc6 = /bin/sh /usr/bin/pear php-pear(Date) php-pear(PEAR) * %check is not present; there are tests but it is not possible to execute them automatically. * package is not relocatable. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * scriptlets OK (PEAR module installation) * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 8 20:11:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2006 16:11:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197417] Review Request: php-pear-Validate - PEAR: Validation class In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609082011.k88KBHVI015143@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Validate - PEAR: Validation class Alias: php-pear-Validate https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197417 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-09-08 16:11 EST ------- I neglected to mention that the Summary: is a bit lacking. And for the %description, "datas" isn't a word. Neither keep this package from being approved, but you might want to flesh out the Summary a bit and s/datas/data/ in %description. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 8 20:11:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2006 16:11:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197420] Review Request: php-pear-Payment-Process - PEAR: Unified payment processor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609082011.k88KBvoi015224@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Payment-Process - PEAR: Unified payment processor Alias: pear-Payment-Process https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197420 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |tibbs at math.uh.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 8 20:26:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2006 16:26:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192418] Review Request: xbae - Xbae widget set In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609082026.k88KQRik016720@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xbae - Xbae widget set https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192418 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-09-08 16:26 EST ------- (In reply to comment #12) > Review for release 3: > > Notes: > Any reason for > Obsoletes: Xbae < %{version}-%{release} It is to replace Xbae packages that have been provided up to fedora core 2. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 8 20:28:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2006 16:28:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197814] Review Request: autogen In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609082028.k88KSvmX016884@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: autogen https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197814 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-09-08 16:28 EST ------- http://www.knox.net.nz/~nodoid/autogen.spec Fixes #29 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 8 20:30:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2006 16:30:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193897] Review Request: mysql-connector-java - Official JDBC driver for MySQL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609082030.k88KUZrx017039@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mysql-connector-java - Official JDBC driver for MySQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193897 ------- Additional Comments From ifoox at redhat.com 2006-09-08 16:30 EST ------- http://people.redhat.com/ifoox/extras/mysql-connector-java-3.1.12-1jpp_5fc.src.rpm http://people.redhat.com/ifoox/extras/mysql-connector-java.spec (In reply to comment #16) > One final thing and this is APPROVED. See the line starting in 'X'. Fixed > Also, why are you packaging version 3.1.12 when the most recent version is > 5something. We normally require that the most recent version be packaged. As far as I understand 5something is the -devel version, and so I'm not sure that's the best thing to package. But I'll investigate it later and update if I think it makes sense. I think having this package in for the time being so that other packages can use it is good. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 8 20:50:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2006 16:50:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204975] Review Request: vigra - Generic Programming for Computer Vision In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609082050.k88Ko12B018047@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vigra - Generic Programming for Computer Vision https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204975 ------- Additional Comments From bruno at postle.net 2006-09-08 16:49 EST ------- (In reply to comment #6) Thanks for sponsoring me, I'm reading through the docs now. > %defattr(-, root, root,-) Done. > 2. This package appears to be able to use 'boost python'. Might > look into submitting boost and boost-python? I've looked into it and the --with-boostpython option is obsolete, there is now a separate vigrapython package: https://mailhost.informatik.uni-hamburg.de/pipermail/vigra/2006-March/000199.html I've also extended the BuildRequires, as vigra needs fftw >= 3 and gcc-c++ isn't installed on a standard system: Spec URL: http://bugbear.blackfish.org.uk/~bruno/apt/SPECS/vigra.spec SRPM URL: http://bugbear.blackfish.org.uk/~bruno/apt/fedora/linux/5/x86_64/SRPMS.panorama/vigra-1.4.0-3.fc5.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 8 20:52:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2006 16:52:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193897] Review Request: mysql-connector-java - Official JDBC driver for MySQL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609082052.k88KqM7V018223@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mysql-connector-java - Official JDBC driver for MySQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193897 green at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From green at redhat.com 2006-09-08 16:52 EST ------- APPROVED Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 8 20:52:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2006 16:52:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200064] Review Request: libpano12 : Library and tools for manipulating panoramic images In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609082052.k88Kqri7018299@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libpano12 : Library and tools for manipulating panoramic images https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200064 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-09-08 16:52 EST ------- Excellent! Please feel free to import this into Fedora Extras - remember to close this bug and set the RESOLVE BUG to NEXT_RELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 8 20:52:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2006 16:52:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189150] Review Request: mod_mono In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609082052.k88KqqkX018290@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mod_mono https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189150 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-09-08 16:52 EST ------- Fixed all the bits. The source is actually permitted as it stands (I queried this over another package a while back and it was fine) rpmlint is now clean mock is happy (i386) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 8 21:00:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2006 17:00:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 195223] Review Request: pavucontrol: Volume control for PulseAudio In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609082100.k88L0x7h018651@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pavucontrol: Volume control for PulseAudio https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195223 ------- Additional Comments From drzeus-bugzilla at drzeus.cx 2006-09-08 17:00 EST ------- Spec URL: http://homes.drzeus.cx/~drzeus/pulseaudio/pavucontrol.spec SRPM URL: http://homes.drzeus.cx/~drzeus/pulseaudio/pavucontrol-0.9.4-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 8 21:25:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2006 17:25:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197565] Review Request: buildbot In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609082125.k88LPAGI019966@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: buildbot https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197565 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-09-08 17:24 EST ------- You still have several unowned directories under %{python_sitelib}/buildbot. Why can't you just have a %files section like: %files %defattr(-,root,root,-) %doc ChangeLog NEWS README docs %{_bindir}/buildbot %{python_sitelib}/buildbot %{_datadir}/%{name} instead of all of those globs. Also, could you comment on the test suite issue I brought up in comment 14? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 8 21:31:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2006 17:31:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205343] Review Request: cohoba - Cohoba is a GNOME interface for Telepathy. It aims to be innovative and simple In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609082131.k88LVe3m020385@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cohoba - Cohoba is a GNOME interface for Telepathy. It aims to be innovative and simple https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205343 ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at ameritech.net 2006-09-08 17:31 EST ------- MD5Sums: 9993159e90791fa8ebb57b4b0839e3bb cohoba-0.0.3.tar.gz Good: * Source URL is canonical * Upstream source tarball verified * Package name conforms to the Fedora Naming Guidelines * Buildroot has all required elements * All paths begin with macros * All necessary BuildRequires listed. * All desired features are enabled * Package builds in Mock. * rpmlint produces no error. Bad: * There is an ownership problem with the '%{_libdir}/cohoba' directory. * I believe you still need a requires on pygtk2, since I don't see anything that will pull in this requirement. * rpmlint produces the following error: E: cohoba only-non-binary-in-usr-lib * The biggest issue was that I could never create an account to get it working on FC5. The problem seemed to be due to account dialog's network spinner button not being populated. I was only allowed to add my account & password, and not the network. Minor: * Group Tag should probably be Applications/Communications -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 8 21:43:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2006 17:43:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193896] Review Request: libreadline-java - Java wrapper for the GNU-readline library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609082143.k88LhlIK021147@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libreadline-java - Java wrapper for the GNU-readline library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193896 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-09-08 17:43 EST ------- OK, the package builds fine in devel with no problems. rpmlint complains much less (just the two that are OK). The other issues I had are fixed as well. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 8 21:43:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2006 17:43:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205343] Review Request: cohoba - Cohoba is a GNOME interface for Telepathy. It aims to be innovative and simple In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609082143.k88LhohR021173@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cohoba - Cohoba is a GNOME interface for Telepathy. It aims to be innovative and simple https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205343 ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at ameritech.net 2006-09-08 17:43 EST ------- Ok, I found out what the problem was with the account not being able to work. You missing a requires on telepathy-gabble. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 8 21:44:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2006 17:44:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197565] Review Request: buildbot In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609082144.k88LiLgP021267@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: buildbot https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197565 ------- Additional Comments From michael at knox.net.nz 2006-09-08 17:44 EST ------- Sorry. Missed that. The test stuff is for running tests on a source tree (if availible), like "make test". Its part of buildbot's process. Its not a test for buildbot itself. Will wrap up a new srpm shortly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 8 21:48:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2006 17:48:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198089] Review Request: padevchooser: Control applet for PulseAudio In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609082148.k88LmTMV021529@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: padevchooser: Control applet for PulseAudio https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198089 ------- Additional Comments From drzeus-bugzilla at drzeus.cx 2006-09-08 17:48 EST ------- Spec URL: http://homes.drzeus.cx/~drzeus/pulseaudio/padevchooser.spec SRPM URL: http://homes.drzeus.cx/~drzeus/pulseaudio/padevchooser-0.9.3-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 8 21:52:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2006 17:52:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 195222] Review Request: paman: Management tool for PulseAudio In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609082152.k88Lqfsu021798@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: paman: Management tool for PulseAudio https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195222 ------- Additional Comments From drzeus-bugzilla at drzeus.cx 2006-09-08 17:52 EST ------- Spec URL: http://homes.drzeus.cx/~drzeus/pulseaudio/paman.spec SRPM URL: http://homes.drzeus.cx/~drzeus/pulseaudio/paman-0.9.3-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 8 22:02:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2006 18:02:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193897] Review Request: mysql-connector-java - Official JDBC driver for MySQL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609082202.k88M2ZJ3022345@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mysql-connector-java - Official JDBC driver for MySQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193897 ifoox at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From ifoox at redhat.com 2006-09-08 18:02 EST ------- Built in -devel, pending FC-5 branch. Closing. Thanks for the review! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 8 22:03:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2006 18:03:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193898] Review Request: Jython - Java source interpreter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609082203.k88M3AWR022397@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Jython - Java source interpreter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193898 Bug 193898 depends on bug 193897, which changed state. Bug 193897 Summary: Review Request: mysql-connector-java - Official JDBC driver for MySQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193897 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 8 22:18:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2006 18:18:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197565] Review Request: buildbot In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609082218.k88MIdiS023044@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: buildbot https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197565 ------- Additional Comments From michael at knox.net.nz 2006-09-08 18:18 EST ------- Updated: Spec URL: http://www.knox.net.nz/~michael/buildbot.spec SRPM URL: http://www.knox.net.nz/~michael/buildbot-0.7.4-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 8 22:18:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2006 18:18:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 195222] Review Request: paman: Management tool for PulseAudio In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609082218.k88MIrXw023076@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: paman: Management tool for PulseAudio https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195222 ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at ameritech.net 2006-09-08 18:18 EST ------- Looks like you missing a BR on desktop-file-utils. Also, is there any reason why your not setting the vendor to fedora? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 8 22:25:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2006 18:25:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 195222] Review Request: paman: Management tool for PulseAudio In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609082225.k88MP3bq023324@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: paman: Management tool for PulseAudio https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195222 ------- Additional Comments From drzeus-bugzilla at drzeus.cx 2006-09-08 18:24 EST ------- Ah, right, the BR is missing. For the vendor bit, see the discussion in bug 195223. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 8 22:33:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2006 18:33:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 195223] Review Request: pavucontrol: Volume control for PulseAudio In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609082233.k88MXKHO023715@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pavucontrol: Volume control for PulseAudio https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195223 ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at ameritech.net 2006-09-08 18:33 EST ------- (In reply to comment #6) > So that the .desktop file (name) doesn't vary from upstream, I'd suggest > using: > --vendor="" > instead. Rex, maybe I'm missing something here. Why does it matter if you are setting the vendor? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 8 22:58:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2006 18:58:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 195223] Review Request: pavucontrol: Volume control for PulseAudio In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609082258.k88MwKgU024519@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pavucontrol: Volume control for PulseAudio https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195223 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-09-08 18:58 EST ------- > Why does it matter if you are setting the vendor? What *matters* is that .desktop files not get renamed, and adding --vendor does just that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 8 23:03:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2006 19:03:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202521] Review Request: RutilT In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609082303.k88N3Ris024639@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: RutilT https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202521 ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2006-09-08 19:03 EST ------- Spec URL: http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/SPECS/RutilT.spec SRPM URL: http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/testing/RutilT-0.12-3_FC5.src.rpm Description: Configuration tool for Ralink Wireless devices. This utility is now required by kmod-rt2500 rpmlint is silent (but debug package is empty - need to be disabled - how?) Not sure about how to link to wireless.h for Fedora Core 5... Need to define kversion (for FC4, FC6). Default is kversion 2.6.17-1.2174_FC5. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 8 23:18:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2006 19:18:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 195223] Review Request: pavucontrol: Volume control for PulseAudio In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609082318.k88NISZW025088@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pavucontrol: Volume control for PulseAudio https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195223 ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at ameritech.net 2006-09-08 19:18 EST ------- (In reply to comment #10) > > Why does it matter if you are setting the vendor? > > What *matters* is that .desktop files not get renamed, and adding --vendor does > just that. I was aware that adding the vendor changes the desktop filename, but I guess my question is why does it matter if the desktop file gets renamed? Plenty of packages in extras do it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 8 23:27:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2006 19:27:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193896] Review Request: libreadline-java - Java wrapper for the GNU-readline library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609082327.k88NRamT025367@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libreadline-java - Java wrapper for the GNU-readline library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193896 ------- Additional Comments From ifoox at redhat.com 2006-09-08 19:27 EST ------- New files: http://people.redhat.com/ifoox/extras/libreadline-java.spec http://people.redhat.com/ifoox/extras/libreadline-java-0.8.0-12.src.rpm I was looking at getting bug #193898 into shape, and saw that I need to switch libreadline-java to use libedit instead of readline due to licensing issues with Jython. I uploaded a new spec and srpm. There are no new rpmlint warnings, and the debuginfo warning has disappeared. Please have a quick look and let me know, if this looks reasonable, and I will build it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 9 00:23:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2006 20:23:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 195223] Review Request: pavucontrol: Volume control for PulseAudio In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609090023.k890NXUx027778@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pavucontrol: Volume control for PulseAudio https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195223 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-09-08 20:23 EST ------- > why does it matter if the desktop file gets renamed? Lots of reasons, one of which is menu editing. > Plenty of packages in extras do it. I know, but they (mostly) shouldn't have. But, since the files were renamed once, they probably ought to stay that way (else we'd comitt the sin of renaming them *again*). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 9 00:51:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2006 20:51:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193898] Review Request: Jython - Java source interpreter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609090051.k890pxa0028766@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Jython - Java source interpreter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193898 ------- Additional Comments From ifoox at redhat.com 2006-09-08 20:51 EST ------- New files: http://people.redhat.com/ifoox/extras/jython-2.2-0.a0.2jpp_2fc.src.rpm http://people.redhat.com/ifoox/extras/jython.spec (In reply to comment #2) > Just some quick comments from looking at parts of the spec file.. > > - Summary is odd: "Java source interpreter" Fixed > - Source lines should be URLs to sources The source appears to be a CVS snapshot, but I'll check to make sure whether it's not downloaded. > - Remove Epoch Fixed. > - Change Group to Development/Libraries Fixed. > - Make BuildRoot standard Fixed. > - Remove these lines... > Distribution: JPackage > Vendor: JPackage Project Fixed. Also fixed: - Add dist tag. - Fix compile line to use the system Python libraries instead of the python2.2 source. - Remove Source1 (python2.2 library). - Move buildroot removal from prep to install. - Use libedit (EditLine) instead of GNU readline. (In reply to comment #3) > BTW, I don't think we should be linking libreadline-java with jython since I > believe the licenses are incompatible. See this thread for discussion and a > potential solution: > http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_id=707283 I've built the latest version of libreadline-java against libedit (EditLine) instead of GNU readline, libedit is LGPL, and is what the poster in the thread you mention proposes. So this should be fine. See bug #193896. There are still many issues to resolve with this package, I will try to resolve most of them tomorrow. But I have a few questions which hopefully someone can answer. 1. rpmlint gives me errors like this when running it on the main rpm: E: jython non-executable-script /usr/share/jython/Lib/Cookie.py 0644 It doesn't give it for all the .py files in that directory, even though they all have the same permissions. Should these be 755, or should these files be moved to /usr/lib instead? 2. What should be the group for jython-demo? I put it in Development/Documentation along with the manual and javadoc, but I'm not sure this is right. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 9 00:55:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2006 20:55:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193896] Review Request: libreadline-java - Java wrapper for the GNU-readline library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609090055.k890tfYd028885@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libreadline-java - Java wrapper for the GNU-readline library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193896 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-09-08 20:55 EST ------- Yes, this still builds fine and looks pretty much the same as the previous version outside of a couple of name changes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 9 01:14:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2006 21:14:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200941] Review Request: SooperLooper, a realtime software looping sampler (&Jack client) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609090114.k891E5nf029368@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: SooperLooper, a realtime software looping sampler (&Jack client) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200941 ------- Additional Comments From green at redhat.com 2006-09-08 21:14 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=135893) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=135893&action=view) Updated spec file The attached spec file builds cleanly in mock on rawhide. A few other problems/questions.... 1. glibc reports a bug in liblo when you run it. I have a patch for liblo and will respin a new one for Fedora Extras shortly. 2. The gui comes up and starts the engine, however, very soon afterwards it reports a Lost Connection: "Lost connection to SooperLooper engine. See the Preferences->Connections tab to start a new one". Has anybody seen this before? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 9 01:14:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2006 21:14:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197565] Review Request: buildbot In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609090114.k891EoPP029403@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: buildbot https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197565 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-09-08 21:14 EST ------- OK, everything looks fine now. THe directories all look to be properly owned, rpmlint is silent and what I thought might be a test suite isn't. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 9 01:20:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2006 21:20:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193896] Review Request: libreadline-java - Java wrapper for the GNU-readline library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609090120.k891K8k7029602@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libreadline-java - Java wrapper for the GNU-readline library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193896 ifoox at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From ifoox at redhat.com 2006-09-08 21:19 EST ------- Built in development. Closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 9 01:20:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2006 21:20:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193898] Review Request: Jython - Java source interpreter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609090120.k891Kfk6029638@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Jython - Java source interpreter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193898 Bug 193898 depends on bug 193896, which changed state. Bug 193896 Summary: Review Request: libreadline-java - Java wrapper for the GNU-readline library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193896 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |RAWHIDE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 9 01:29:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2006 21:29:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200941] Review Request: SooperLooper, a realtime software looping sampler (&Jack client) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609090129.k891T744029871@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: SooperLooper, a realtime software looping sampler (&Jack client) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200941 ------- Additional Comments From green at redhat.com 2006-09-08 21:28 EST ------- (In reply to comment #14) > 2. The gui comes up and starts the engine, however, very soon afterwards it > reports a Lost Connection: "Lost connection to SooperLooper engine. See the > Preferences->Connections tab to start a new one". Has anybody seen this > before? This was a DNS problem on my system. Ignore. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 9 01:35:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2006 21:35:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200941] Review Request: SooperLooper, a realtime software looping sampler (&Jack client) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609090135.k891ZHsl030012@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: SooperLooper, a realtime software looping sampler (&Jack client) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200941 green at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 9 01:51:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2006 21:51:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192600] Review Request: sflowtool - Command line utility for analyzing sFlow data In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609090151.k891pWLq030647@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sflowtool - Command line utility for analyzing sFlow data https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192600 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |182235 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-09-08 21:51 EST ------- I took a look but the license is beyond me. It's a bit long, but I'll include it here and block FE-Legal with the hope that doing so will actually induce someone who understands this kind of thing to take a look. LICENSE AGREEMENT PLEASE READ THIS LICENSE AGREEMENT ("AGREEMENT") CAREFULLY BEFORE REPRODUCING OR IN ANY WAY UTILIZING THE sFlow(R) SOFTWARE ("SOFTWARE") AND/OR ANY ACCOMPANYING DOCUMENTATION ("DOCUMENTATION") AND/OR THE RELATED SPECIFICATIONS ("SPECIFICATIONS"). YOUR REPRODUCTION OR USE OF THE SOFTWARE AND/OR THE DOCUMENTATION AND/OR THE SPECIFICATIONS CONSTITUTES YOUR ACCEPTANCE OF THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THIS AGREEMENT. IF YOU DO NOT AGREE TO BE BOUND BY THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THIS AGREEMENT, YOU MAY NOT REPRODUCE OR IN ANY WAY UTILIZE THE SOFTWARE OR THE DOCUMENTATION OR THE SPECIFICATIONS. 1. Definitions. "Documentation" means the user manuals, training materials, and operating materials, if any, InMon provides to Licensee under this Agreement. "InMon" means InMon Corporation, its affiliates and subsidiaries. "Intellectual Property Rights" means any trade secrets, patents, including without limitation any patents covering the Software, copyrights, know-how, moral rights and similar rights of any type under the laws of any governmental authority, domestic or foreign, including all applications and registrations relating to any of the foregoing. "Licensee Hardware" means all computers, routers, or other equipment owned or controlled by or on behalf of Licensee. "Products" means any and all software applications, computers, routers, or other equipment manufactured by or on behalf of Licensee for the purpose of resale or lease to any other third party, or otherwise made available by Licensee free of charge. "Software" means the sFlow(R) software programs, in source or binary code format, that Licensee licenses from InMon under this Agreement and any bug fixes or error corrections which InMon may provide to Licensee. "Specifications" means the published specifications provided or otherwise made available by InMon at: http://www.sflow.org. "Trademark" means InMon's "sFlow(R)" trademark. 2. License Grant. 2.1 Software, Documentation and Specifications License Grant. InMon hereby grants to Licensee, under all of InMon's Intellectual Property Rights therein, a perpetual (subject to InMon's termination rights under Section 7 below), nonexclusive, royalty-free, worldwide, transferable, sublicensable license, to: (i) use and reproduce the Software, the Documentation, and the Specifications; (ii) modify the Software; (iii) implement the Specifications in the Products; (iv) install the Software, or software in which the Specifications have been implemented, on Licensee Hardware and Products, and (v) distribute any Products that include the Software, the Documentation, or software in which the Specifications have been implemented. 2.2 Trademark License. InMon hereby grants to Licensee a perpetual (subject to InMon's termination rights under Section 7 below), nonexclusive, royalty-free, worldwide, transferable, sublicensable license to use the Trademark on or in connection with the Software, the Documentation, the Specifications and any software that implements the Specifications. 2.3 Restrictions. Licensee agrees that it will not use the Software in a way inconsistent with the license granted in Section 2.1. Further, Licensee agrees that, in exercising its rights under the license granted to it in this Agreement, Licensee will: (i) strictly adhere to and fully comply with the Specifications; (ii) use the Trademark, and no other mark, to identify the Software, the Documentation, the Specifications and any Products that implement the Specifications; (iii) place, in a font or graphic design designated by InMon, the phrase "sFlow(R)" on any technical documentation, sales/marketing materials, catalogs, or other such materials relating to products it manufactures or markets which it has configured to be compatible with the Software or otherwise implement the Specifications; (iv) in connection with any Products shipped to or sold in other countries that include the Software or any software that implements the Specifications, comply with the patent and trademark laws and practice of such other country; and (v) not alter or impair any acknowledgment of copyright or trademark rights of InMon that may appear in or on the Software, the Documentation or the Specifications. In the event InMon determines that Licensee is not complying with its obligations under clauses (i)-(v) above, InMon shall notify Licensee of such non-compliance, and if Licensee fails to correct such non-compliance within three (3) months, InMon may immediately terminate this Agreement as provided under paragraph 7 below and pursue any and all actions and remedies as it deems necessary, including, but not limited to breach of contract. 3. Ownership. Except for the license expressly granted in Section 2, Inmon hereby retains all right, title, and interest in and to the Trademark and all its Intellectual Property Rights in the Software, the Documentation and the Specifications. Licensee obtains no rights hereunder in the Trademark, Software, Documentation or Specifications by implication, estoppel or otherwise. Licensee acknowledges that the Trademark, Software, Documentation and Specifications are being licensed and not sold under this Agreement, and that this Agreement does not transfer title in the Trademark, Software, Documentation or Specifications, or any copy thereof, to Licensee. 4. Support. Inmon shall have no obligation under this Agreement to (a) supply maintenance or support, bug fixes or error corrections to the Licensed Software, (b) supply future versions of the Licensed Software or (c) provide Licensed Software development tools to Licensee. 5. Warranty. INMON HEREBY DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES, EITHER EXPRESS, IMPLIED OR STATUTORY, WITH RESPECT TO THE TRADEMARK, THE SOFTWARE, THE DOCUMENTATION, THE SPECIFICATIONS. OR OTHERWISE, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NON-INFRINGEMENT OF ANY INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS. 6. Limitation of Liability. IN NO EVENT SHALL INMON OR ITS SUPPLIERS OR LICENSORS BE LIABLE FOR ANY CONSEQUENTIAL, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, INDIRECT OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES WHATSOEVER, WHETHER RELATED TO OR ARISING OUT OF THIS AGREEMENT, THE TRADEMARK, THE SOFTWARE, THE DOCUMENTATION, THE SPECIFICATIONS, OR OTHERWISE, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, DAMAGES FOR LOSS OF PROFITS, BUSINESS INTERRUPTION, LOSS OF DATA, COSTS OF PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES OR FOR ANY CLAIM OR DEMAND AGAINST LICENSEE BY ANY OTHER PARTY, OR OTHER PECUNIARY LOSS, EVEN IF INMON HAS BEEN ADVISED OF OR KNOWS OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES. 7. Term and Termination. The term of this Agreement will begin on the Effective Date, which shall be deemed to be the date of delivery of the Software and/or Documentation and/or Specifications to Licensee, and shall continue indefinitely unless and until terminated by Licensee's giving written notice of termination to InMon, or by InMon pursuant to InMon's termination rights as set forth in Section 2.3 above. Upon any termination of this Agreement, Licensee shall cease exercising its license rights under this Agreement, including the right to distribute Products that incorporate the Software or Documentation or that implement the Specifications. The rights and obligations contained in Sections 1, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 8 shall survive any termination of this Agreement. 8. General Provisions. 8.1 Assignment. This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties hereto and their permitted successors and permitted assigns. InMon will have the right to assign this Agreement without notice to Licensee. Licensee may assign or transfer (whether by merger, operation of law or in any other manner) any of its rights or delegate any of its obligations hereunder without the prior written consent of InMon, provided the assignee assumes in writing all of Licensee's obligations hereunder. 8.2 Notices. All notices permitted or required under this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be delivered in person or mailed by first class, registered or certified mail, postage prepaid, to the address of the party specified in this Agreement or such other address as either party may specify in writing. Such notice shall be deemed to have been given upon receipt. 8.3 Non-Waiver. No term or provision hereof shall be deemed waived, and no breach excused, unless such waiver or consent shall be in writing and signed by the party claimed to have waived or consented. Any consent or waiver, whether express or implied, shall not constitute a consent or waiver of, or excuse for any separate, different or subsequent breach. 8.4 Independent Contractor. The parties' relationship shall be solely that of independent contractors, and nothing contained in this Agreement shall be construed to make either party an agent, partner, representative or principal of the other for any purpose. 8.5 Choice of Law and Forum. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed under the laws of the State of California, without giving effect to such state's conflict of laws principles. The parties hereby submit to the personal jurisdiction of, and agree that any legal proceeding with respect to or arising under this Agreement shall be brought in, the United States District Court for the Northern District of California or the state courts of the State of California for the County of San Francisco. 8.6 U.S. Government Licenses. The Software and Documentation are considered a "commercial item" as that term is defined at 48 C.F.R 2.101, or "commercial computer software" and "commercial computer software documentation" as such terms are used in 48 C.F.R 12.212 of the Federal Acquisition Regulations and its successors, and 48 C.F.R. 227.7202 of the DoD FAR Supplement and its successors. 8.7 Severability. If any provision of this Agreement is held to be unenforceable under applicable law, then such provision shall be excluded from this Agreement and the balance of this Agreement shall be interpreted as if such provision were so excluded and shall be enforceable in accordance with its terms. The court in its discretion may substitute for the excluded provision an enforceable provision which in economic substance reasonably approximates the excluded provision. 8.8 Compliance With Law. Licensee shall comply with all applicable laws and regulations (including privacy laws and regulations) having application to or governing its use and/or operation of the Software and agrees to indemnify and hold InMon harmless from and against any claims, damages, losses or obligations suffered or incurred by InMon arising from its failure to so comply. 8.9 Entire Agreement; Amendment. This Agreement constitutes the final, complete and entire agreement between the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof, and supersedes any previous proposals, negotiations, agreements, or arrangements, whether verbal or written, made between the parties with respect to such subject matter. This Agreement shall control over any additional or conflicting terms in any of Licensee's purchase orders or other business forms. This Agreement may only be amended or modified by mutual agreement of authorized representatives of the parties in writing. InMon Corp. 580 California Street, 5th Floor, San Francisco, CA 94104 Phone: (415) 283-3260 URL: www.inmon.com Email: info at inmon.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 9 02:03:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2006 22:03:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200941] Review Request: SooperLooper, a realtime software looping sampler (&Jack client) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609090203.k8923Pkd030967@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: SooperLooper, a realtime software looping sampler (&Jack client) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200941 ------- Additional Comments From green at redhat.com 2006-09-08 22:03 EST ------- I think there are only a couple of minor issues. See the lines that start with 'X'. This assumes the tweaks in my uploaded spec file are accepted. * package meets packaging guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * dist tag is present. * build root is correct. %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * License text included in package. * source files match upstream. md5sum... 9b34c7cb8fc6daa4c7a9c17004680dac sooperlooper-1.0.8c.tar.gz * latest version is being packaged. X BuildRequires are almost proper. - Look at the changes I made in the spec file I attached in Comment #14 to handle FC releases > 5. * package builds in mock. * rpmlint says: W: sooperlooper mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs I just use the emacs untabify command to clean these things up. * final provides and requires are sane: sooperlooper-1.0.8-0.2.c.fc6.i386.rpm sooperlooper = 1.0.8-0.2.c.fc6 = libasound.so.2 libasound.so.2(ALSA_0.9) libjack.so.0 liblo.so.0 libncurses.so.5 libsamplerate.so.0 libsamplerate.so.0(libsamplerate.so.0.0) libsigc-1.2.so.5 libsndfile.so.1 libsndfile.so.1(libsndfile.so.1.0) libstdc++.so.6 libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3) libstdc++.so.6(GLIBCXX_3.4) libwx_baseu-2.6.so.0 libwx_baseu-2.6.so.0(WXU_2.6) libwx_baseu_net-2.6.so.0 libwx_baseu_xml-2.6.so.0 libwx_gtk2u_adv-2.6.so.0 libwx_gtk2u_adv-2.6.so.0(WXU_2.6) libwx_gtk2u_core-2.6.so.0 libwx_gtk2u_core-2.6.so.0(WXU_2.6) libwx_gtk2u_core-2.6.so.0(WXU_2.6.2) libwx_gtk2u_html-2.6.so.0 libwx_gtk2u_html-2.6.so.0(WXU_2.6) libwx_gtk2u_qa-2.6.so.0 libwx_gtk2u_xrc-2.6.so.0 libxml2.so.2 libz.so.1 * shared libraries not present. * package is not relocatable. * owns the directories it creates. X Should Require hicolor-icon-theme since it places an icon in a directory owned by that package. This is something I just learned about myself, and plan on cleaning up my old packages. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * %clean is present. * %check is not present * scriptlets OK. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no libtool .la droppings. X .desktop file is installed properly, but should refer to "SooperLooper", not "Sooperlooper". * not a web app. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 9 02:04:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2006 22:04:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200941] Review Request: SooperLooper, a realtime software looping sampler (&Jack client) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609090204.k8924PUw031029@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: SooperLooper, a realtime software looping sampler (&Jack client) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200941 green at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(nando at ccrma.stanfo | |rd.edu) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 9 02:05:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2006 22:05:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200941] Review Request: SooperLooper, a realtime software looping sampler (&Jack client) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609090205.k8925j5M031097@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: SooperLooper, a realtime software looping sampler (&Jack client) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200941 green at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |green at redhat.com Flag|needinfo?(nando at ccrma.stanfo| |rd.edu) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 9 02:40:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2006 22:40:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193898] Review Request: Jython - Java source interpreter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609090240.k892ecgN000541@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Jython - Java source interpreter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193898 ------- Additional Comments From green at redhat.com 2006-09-08 22:40 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > > - Change Group to Development/Libraries > Fixed. I'm sorry. This was another mistake of mine. It should be "System Environment/Libraries". > 1. rpmlint gives me errors like this when running it on the main rpm: > E: jython non-executable-script /usr/share/jython/Lib/Cookie.py 0644 > It doesn't give it for all the .py files in that directory, even though they all > have the same permissions. Should these be 755, or should these files be moved > to /usr/lib instead? I think staying in /usr/share is fine. I don't know why it's complaining. > 2. What should be the group for jython-demo? > I put it in Development/Documentation along with the manual and javadoc, but I'm > not sure this is right. Actually, FE has no Development/Documentation group. It should just be Documentation. I can't think of a better place for the demos. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 9 02:50:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2006 22:50:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203205] Review Request: eclipse-phpeclipse In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609090250.k892oZNw001283@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-phpeclipse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203205 green at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |green at redhat.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 9 03:48:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2006 23:48:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199108] Review Request: gutenprint: Printer Drivers Package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609090348.k893mDWj005058@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gutenprint: Printer Drivers Package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199108 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-09-08 23:48 EST ------- In answer to comment #47: This package builds fine and installs ok alongside gimp-print. Unfortunately, I only have one printer here and it's being cranky. I am able to select the gutenprint drivers in system-config-printer and in the cups admin interface. Can some more of the folks watching this review try the package out and see if they run into any problems? It's looking ok here from prelim testing... In answer to comment #48: fc6 is frozen now, and has gimp-print in it. fc7 will likely have gutenprint, but thats going to be quite a while away for most people to use. If we can get this package in extras to work alongside the gimp-print that helps a lots of people, until it can be merged into core in fc7. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 9 03:53:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2006 23:53:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204975] Review Request: vigra - Generic Programming for Computer Vision In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609090353.k893rasN005326@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vigra - Generic Programming for Computer Vision https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204975 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-09-08 23:53 EST ------- In reply to comment #7: ok on the defattr change. I just saw the --with-boostpython in the configure script, so I thought I would mention it. No problem if it's obsolete now. Requiring fftw >= 3 is fine, but gcc-c++ is part of the base build env: http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Exceptions so it doesn't need to be listed there. Otherwise the package looks good to go to me. Let me know if you run into any problems with the procedure to import and build. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 9 03:59:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2006 23:59:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189150] Review Request: mod_mono In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609090359.k893xEdL005436@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mod_mono https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189150 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-09-08 23:59 EST ------- In reply to comment #12: Great. Can you upload the fixed version to look at? :) Is there any reason not to include the full URL in Source0? It does make it easier for someone to download the source without having to hunt around on the site for a download link... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 9 04:27:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Sep 2006 00:27:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203205] Review Request: eclipse-phpeclipse In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609090427.k894RqnR006144@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-phpeclipse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203205 ------- Additional Comments From green at redhat.com 2006-09-09 00:27 EST ------- Let's look at the rpmlint output: E: eclipse-phpeclipse description-line-too-long The PHPeclipse plugin allows developers to write PHP webpages and scripts in Eclipse. I've never seen this before. Should be easy to fix. W: eclipse-phpeclipse non-standard-group Text Editors/Integrated Development Environments (IDE) Please use Development/Tools. W: eclipse-phpeclipse incoherent-version-in-changelog 1.1.8-6 1.1.8-7 This must be a typo. W: eclipse-phpeclipse invalid-license Common Public License (CPL) 1.0 Please just use "CPL". W: eclipse-phpeclipse no-documentation At a minimum, please add the license text as a %doc in the %files section. W: eclipse-phpeclipse hidden-file-or-dir /usr/share/eclipse/plugins/net.sourceforge.phpeclipse.launching_1.1.8/.classpath W: eclipse-phpeclipse hidden-file-or-dir /usr/share/eclipse/plugins/net.sourceforge.phpeclipse.phphelp_1.1.8/.classpath W: eclipse-phpeclipse hidden-file-or-dir /usr/share/eclipse/plugins/net.sourceforge.phpeclipse.debug.core_1.1.8/.project W: eclipse-phpeclipse hidden-file-or-dir /usr/share/eclipse/plugins/net.sourceforge.phpeclipse.debug.core_1.1.8/.template W: eclipse-phpeclipse hidden-file-or-dir /usr/share/eclipse/plugins/net.sourceforge.phpeclipse.debug.core_1.1.8/.classpath W: eclipse-phpeclipse hidden-file-or-dir /usr/share/eclipse/plugins/net.sourceforge.phpeclipse.debug.ui_1.1.8/.template W: eclipse-phpeclipse hidden-file-or-dir /usr/share/eclipse/plugins/net.sourceforge.phpeclipse.launching_1.1.8/.project W: eclipse-phpeclipse hidden-file-or-dir /usr/share/eclipse/plugins/net.sourceforge.phpeclipse.launching_1.1.8/.template I've never seen these before. Can we delete them, or are they important? W: eclipse-phpeclipse one-line-command-in-%post /usr/bin/rebuild-gcj-db W: eclipse-phpeclipse one-line-command-in-%postun /usr/bin/rebuild-gcj-db Use single lines like this instead: %post -p %{_bindir}/rebuild-gcj-db The rest are from the SRPM.... E: eclipse-phpeclipse description-line-too-long The PHPeclipse plugin allows developers to write PHP webpages and scripts in Eclipse. W: eclipse-phpeclipse non-standard-group Text Editors/Integrated Development Environments (IDE) W: eclipse-phpeclipse invalid-license Common Public License (CPL) 1.0 All as above. W: eclipse-phpeclipse mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs I just use the emacs untabify command for this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 9 05:06:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Sep 2006 01:06:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197417] Review Request: php-pear-Validate - PEAR: Validation class In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609090506.k8956t9m007057@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Validate - PEAR: Validation class Alias: php-pear-Validate https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197417 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 9 05:07:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Sep 2006 01:07:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197420] Review Request: php-pear-Payment-Process - PEAR: Unified payment processor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609090507.k8957HmY007090@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Payment-Process - PEAR: Unified payment processor Alias: pear-Payment-Process https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197420 Bug 197420 depends on bug 197417, which changed state. Bug 197417 Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Validate - PEAR: Validation class https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197417 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 9 05:45:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Sep 2006 01:45:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197565] Review Request: buildbot In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609090545.k895j0Li007899@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: buildbot https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197565 michael at knox.net.nz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From michael at knox.net.nz 2006-09-09 01:44 EST ------- Thanks! imported and built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 9 06:05:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Sep 2006 02:05:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204852] Review Request: tuxpaint-stamps - Extra stamp files for tuxpaint In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609090605.k89651mV008349@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tuxpaint-stamps - Extra stamp files for tuxpaint https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204852 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |kevin at tummy.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-09-09 02:04 EST ------- OK - Package name OK - Spec file matches base package name. OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines. OK - License (GPL) OK - License field in spec matches OK - License file included in package OK - Spec in American English OK - Spec is legible. OK - Sources match upstream md5sum: 6edf92504b1b9f9943e3b28011738691 tuxpaint-stamps-2005.11.25.tar.gz 6edf92504b1b9f9943e3b28011738691 tuxpaint-stamps-2005.11.25.tar.gz.1 OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch. OK - BuildRequires correct OK - Spec handles locales/find_lang OK - Package owns all the directories it creates. OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files. OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. OK - Package has a correct %clean section. OK - Spec has consistant macro usage. OK - Package is code or permissible content. OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime. OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. See below - No rpmlint output. SHOULD Items: OK - Should include License or ask upstream to include it. OK - Should build in mock. Issues: 1. The rpmlint error: E: tuxpaint-stamps incorrect-locale-sv /usr/share/locale/sw/LC_MESSAGES/ tuxpaint-stamps.mo seems to be saying that sw is a invalid locale, and should be sv? >From the I18NCheck.py file in rpmlint: # Associative array of invalid value => correct value INCORRECT_LOCALES = { 'in': 'id', 'in_ID': 'id_ID', 'iw': 'he', 'iw_IL': 'he_IL', 'gr': 'el', 'gr_GR': 'el_GR', 'cz': 'cs', 'cz_CZ': 'cs_CZ', 'sw': 'sv', 'lug': 'lg', # 'lug' is valid, but we standardize on 2 letter codes 'en_UK': 'en_GB'} So perhaps move the sw locale files to the sv directory? I think sw is not a valid locale, so those files should be sv files. I see tuxpaint itself does this as well, perhaps a bug should be filed against it? Thats the only issue I see here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 9 06:26:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Sep 2006 02:26:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204852] Review Request: tuxpaint-stamps - Extra stamp files for tuxpaint In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609090626.k896Q9ba008788@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tuxpaint-stamps - Extra stamp files for tuxpaint https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204852 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-09-09 02:25 EST ------- Looking at the locale thing further, it looks like it is a bogus error. The file is a sw file, but rpmlint doesn't see that as a valid locale. That I18NCheck.py file was last modified more than 6 years ago, so it could be very out of date. It might be worth posting to the extras list to see if anyone has further ideas on it, but I'll go ahead and APPROVE this package now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 9 08:44:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Sep 2006 04:44:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204579] Review Request: libatomic_ops - Atomic memory update operations In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609090844.k898i2Mp014685@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libatomic_ops - Atomic memory update operations https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204579 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl CC|j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl | OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-09-09 04:43 EST ------- I see that this indeed is a special package and that making a .so for it is of of little use. MUST: ===== O rpmlint output is: E: libatomic_ops-devel invalid-spec-name libatomic_ops.spec Tihs must be fixed, see below * Package and spec file named appropriately * Packaged according to packaging guidelines * License ok (but license file not included) * spec file is legible and in Am. English. * Source matches upstream (sortof) * "Compiles" and builds on FC-5 i386 * BR: ok * No locales * No shared libraries * Not relocatable * Package owns / or requires all dirs * No duplicate files & Permissions ok * %clean & macro usage OK * Contains code only * %doc does not affect runtime, and isn't large enough to warrent a sub package * no -devel package needed, no libs / .la files. * no .desktop file required Must Fix ======== * "Name:" should be "libatomic_ops" not "libatomic_ops-devel", then add a subpackage -devel, with the same Summary and Description and only add a "%files devel" and not a normal "%files", then rpmbuild will only generate a -devel package * Remove "%define debug_package %{nil}" code gets generated from both the .c and the .h files, people may need this for debugging * Remove the execute rights from src/atomic_ops.h in "%prep", one we get a debuginfo rpmlint will start complaining about the unneeded execute rights, as these stay preserved in the debuginfo package * Since you have no use for these remove them instead of commenting them: " #BuildRequires: #Requires: " * Once you've fixed the "Name:" drop the "-n xxx" argument to "%setup" * Once you've fixed the "Name:" do a search and replace for atomic_ops with %{name}, everywhere except in the "URL:". Should fix: =========== * You can write all this: %dir %{_includedir}/atomic_ops %{_includedir}/atomic_ops/*.h %dir %{_includedir}/atomic_ops/sysdeps %{_includedir}/atomic_ops/sysdeps/* As just: %{_includedir}/%{name} * And this: %dir %{_datadir}/libatomic_ops %{_datadir}/libatomic_ops/* as: %{_datadir}/lib%{name} * Also concider replacing: %{_libdir}/libatomic_ops.a %{_libdir}/libatomic_ops_gpl.a With: %{_libdir}/lib%{name}*.a * Etc. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 9 08:58:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Sep 2006 04:58:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204579] Review Request: libatomic_ops - Atomic memory update operations In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609090858.k898wkru015223@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libatomic_ops - Atomic memory update operations https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204579 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-09-09 04:58 EST ------- Erm, The above MUST list is a copy paste from another review and I forgot to update a few items, please ignore it and use this one. The Must Fix and Should Fix still apply! MUST: ===== O rpmlint output is: E: libatomic_ops-devel invalid-spec-name libatomic_ops.spec This must be fixed, see Must Fix O Package and spec file NOT named appropriately, see Must Fix * Packaged according to packaging guidelines * License GPL/MIT ok and included * spec file is legible and in Am. English. * Source matches upstream * Compiles and builds on devel x86_64 * BR: ok * No locales * No shared libraries * Not relocatable * Package owns / or requires all dirs * No duplicate files & Permissions ok * %clean OK O macro usage not OK due to wrong "Name:", see Must Fix * Contains code only * %doc does not affect runtime, and isn't large enough to warrent a sub package * -devel package as needed * no .so / .la files. * no .desktop file required -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 9 09:15:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Sep 2006 05:15:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187294] Review Request: gwyddion In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609090915.k899FaUY016053@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gwyddion https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187294 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-09-09 05:15 EST ------- (In reply to comment #23) > (In reply to comment #22) > > Indeed this should be the case, but the gwyddion internal > > modules requires the interpreter, so they should pull it in. > > The presence or absence of the interpreters has absolutely no effect of the > function of the main package. So how it comes it requires it? If I do a require for the Gwyddion::dump, it won't work without perl. It is true that the script should require perl (although it may be a script which is not packaged as a rpm) but Gwyddion::dump require perl too. And it is in -libs. > It starts having an effect only after you add something else -- that however > requires the appropriate interpreter itself. A perl module requires perl at any time. (If it was in doc it would be different, however). Moreover having modules packaged separately helps user chosing the right packages. But in any case it is working around the brokeness of not having those modules properly packaged as modules. > Do you mean mean a perl script requires perl indirectly via modules it uses? > Does it imply if a perl script uses no modules it does not require perl? The plugin could be not packaged, but a simple script. In the general case, I think that a perl script requires perl due to the shebang which brings in the interpreter. But it doesn't stop the module from requiring perl. > The direct plug-in -> perl dependency obviously exists, so listing it elsewhere > down the chain is redundant. No. The perl module requires perl and don't requires anything that requires perl. The redundant dependency could be the script direct dependency on perl, but since it is auto-generate, it doesn't hurt. > > Otherwise, you can simplify the spec file by having > > ... > > Well, I prefer the explicit form. Also if installed directories contain files, > I prefer > > %{pkglibdir}/somedir/* > %dir %{pkglibdir}/somedir > > to > > %{pkglibdir}/somedir/ > > as the former fails when nothing gets installed to somedir by accident while the > latter happily packages empty directory. Right, thanks, I ignored that. It is perfectly right in that case. > > Another comment, it seems to me that gwyddion-doc shouldn't own > > %{_datadir}/gtk-doc/ > > but it issems to be casually done by other packages, so it may be > > kept as is. > > This surfaced on FE list more than once, but I don't recall any good solution. > The directory is primarily owned by gtk-doc, but > > Requires: gtk-doc > > is wrong because the documentation is already compiled to HTML and does not > require gtk-doc. > > Requires: %{_datadir}/gtk-doc > > is wrong for the same reason (could be fixed by adding it to filesystem or a > similar base package). So AFAIK all packages that own subdirectories of this > directory currently own it too. Yes, I understand the issue. There is a thread on similar issue currently. I think you do it as rightly as possible. In my opinion having the example plugins packaged in the -devel subpackage is also an error they should be in a separate package, like gwyddion-plugin-examples They are not -devel like stuff, but really an example (which may happen to be usefull so isn't in doc). Then you can have an explicit %description for that subpackage. And also the perl/python and so on interpreters won't be installed when installing the -devel subpackage. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 9 09:27:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Sep 2006 05:27:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205023] Review Request: filelight-1.0 - cool diskspace use browser for kde In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609090927.k899RvbZ017160@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: filelight-1.0 - cool diskspace use browser for kde https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205023 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|rdieter at math.unl.edu |j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-09-09 05:27 EST ------- Rex, Sorry for hijacking this review, but Neal needs a sponsor (and forgot to set the FE_NEEDSPONSOR flag on this) and I'm currently in the process of sponsering him. Also I know /realize that you know much more about KDE then may so feel free to jump in. MUST: ===== * rpmlint output is: E: filelight file-in-usr-marked-as-conffile /usr/share/config/filelightrc W: filelight conffile-without-noreplace-flag /usr/share/config/filelightrc This is normal for KDE packages and can both be ignored * Package and spec file named appropriately * Packaged according to packaging guidelines * License GPL ok and included * spec file is legible and in Am. English. * Source matches upstream * Compiles and builds on devel x86_64 0 BR, some are redundant see must fix 0 No locales, but still %find_lang is used, remove it! * No shared libraries * Not relocatable * Package owns / or requires all dirs * No duplicate files & Permissions ok * %clean & macro usage OK * Contains code only * %doc does not affect runtime, and isn't large enough to warrent a sub package * no -devel package needed, no libs * .la files, but this is ok (KDE exception) O .desktop file as required, but not properly installed Must Fix ======== * Drop the "Vendor: Dag Apt Repository, http://dag.wieers.com/apt/" line * The qt-devel BR is redundant and should be removed as kdelibs-devel already requires it * Drop this line "%find_lang %{name} || touch %{name}.lang" I don't see a -f arg to %files, so clearly this is not needed * Use desktop-file-install as documented in the Scriptles page of the wiki, this is in the review guidelines! If you disagree with the scriptlet page discuss this on the extras mailing list instead of deviating on your own. * You install files under /usr/share/icons, you must add the nescesarry post postun scriptlets to update the icon-cache, and please use the scriplets exactly as documented. Again if you (or Rex) disagree discuss this on the list. * You install files under /usr/share/icons/hicolor, so you must Require hicolor-icon-theme, which is the "filesystem" equivalent for the /usr/share/icons/hicolor dir hierarchy (I just learned this myself recently) Should Fix ========== * Drop the following lines: # $Id$ # Authority: dag # Upstream: Max Howell * "%defattr(-, root, root, 0755)" the FE default for this is "%defattr(-,root,root,-)" -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 9 09:42:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Sep 2006 05:42:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205023] Review Request: filelight-1.0 - cool diskspace use browser for kde In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609090942.k899geUs018394@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: filelight-1.0 - cool diskspace use browser for kde https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205023 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-09-09 05:42 EST ------- Nice way of Hijacking to sponsor anyone. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 9 09:44:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Sep 2006 05:44:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193896] Review Request: libreadline-java - Java wrapper for the GNU-readline library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609090944.k899ikqg018519@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libreadline-java - Java wrapper for the GNU-readline library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193896 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2006-09-09 05:44 EST ------- By the way, it would be great if the readline->libedit change would also make it possible to enable history support in bsh. OTOH, bsh is in core so a buildrequires: libreadline-java wouldn't work, but perhaps it'd be possible to accomplish it without the build dependency some way? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 9 10:09:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Sep 2006 06:09:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192418] Review Request: xbae - Xbae widget set In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609091009.k89A9MrS019328@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xbae - Xbae widget set https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192418 jamatos at fc.up.pt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jamatos at fc.up.pt 2006-09-09 06:09 EST ------- Ah, I see now. What I did not notice the first time is that Xbae is a capitalized version of xbae. That is why it was weird. You could add a comment there saying this, it is easier to understand that way. * there are no duplicates in %files and all the directories are owned * scripts are reasonable and according to the rules * there are no static libraries * there are no language specific files * there is no need for a desktop file * follows the packaging guidelines APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 9 11:07:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Sep 2006 07:07:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204579] Review Request: libatomic_ops - Atomic memory update operations In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609091107.k89B7Gjl022099@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libatomic_ops - Atomic memory update operations https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204579 ------- Additional Comments From drzeus-bugzilla at drzeus.cx 2006-09-09 07:07 EST ------- > * "Name:" should be "libatomic_ops" not "libatomic_ops-devel", then > add a subpackage -devel, with the same Summary and Description and > only add a "%files devel" and not a normal "%files", then rpmbuild will only > generate a -devel package I didn't quite know how to produce a package that wasn't called %{name}, which was my initial intention anyway. :) > * Remove "%define debug_package %{nil}" code gets generated from both the .c > and the .h files, people may need this for debugging I added that because rpmbuild complained that the debug package was empty. So on at least my version, this doesn't work. I'll have a new version up in a bit. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 9 11:10:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Sep 2006 07:10:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189150] Review Request: mod_mono In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609091110.k89BAOKe022244@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mod_mono https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189150 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-09-09 07:10 EST ------- Spec URL: http://www.knox.net.nz/~nodoid/mod_mono.spec SRPM URL: http://www.knox.net.nz/~nodoid/mod_mono-1.1.17-3.src.rpm Spec file altered as the SOURCE and URL were wrong (URL was actually the SOURCE!) Rebuilt -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 9 11:14:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Sep 2006 07:14:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204579] Review Request: libatomic_ops - Atomic memory update operations In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609091114.k89BEfiJ022452@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libatomic_ops - Atomic memory update operations https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204579 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-09-09 07:14 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > > * Remove "%define debug_package %{nil}" code gets generated from both the .c > > and the .h files, people may need this for debugging > > I added that because rpmbuild complained that the debug package was empty. So on > at least my version, this doesn't work. > Erm, Yes ofcourse it won't generate any debbuginfo for a .a as that info gets generated for the package linking against the .a, unfortunatly at that time the .c files and system installed .h files won't be added to the -debuginfo package of the apps being linked against it. I really don't know how to make a debuginfo package with just the sources in there, so I guess that people who need the sources to debug must just install the src.rpm . To make a long story short, you are right and the "%define debug_package %{nil}" can stay. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 9 11:17:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Sep 2006 07:17:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 195222] Review Request: paman: Management tool for PulseAudio In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609091117.k89BH7f0022557@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: paman: Management tool for PulseAudio https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195222 ------- Additional Comments From drzeus-bugzilla at drzeus.cx 2006-09-09 07:17 EST ------- Spec URL: http://homes.drzeus.cx/~drzeus/pulseaudio/paman.spec SRPM URL: http://homes.drzeus.cx/~drzeus/pulseaudio/paman-0.9.3-2.src.rpm BR added. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 9 11:17:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Sep 2006 07:17:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 195223] Review Request: pavucontrol: Volume control for PulseAudio In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609091117.k89BHxIn022600@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pavucontrol: Volume control for PulseAudio https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195223 ------- Additional Comments From drzeus-bugzilla at drzeus.cx 2006-09-09 07:17 EST ------- Spec URL: http://homes.drzeus.cx/~drzeus/pulseaudio/pavucontrol.spec SRPM URL: http://homes.drzeus.cx/~drzeus/pulseaudio/pavucontrol-0.9.4-2.src.rpm BR added. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 9 11:35:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Sep 2006 07:35:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204579] Review Request: libatomic_ops - Atomic memory update operations In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609091135.k89BZPTq023312@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libatomic_ops - Atomic memory update operations https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204579 ------- Additional Comments From drzeus-bugzilla at drzeus.cx 2006-09-09 07:35 EST ------- Spec URL: http://homes.drzeus.cx/~drzeus/atomic/libatomic_ops.spec SRPM URL: http://homes.drzeus.cx/~drzeus/atomic/libatomic_ops-1.1-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 9 11:44:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Sep 2006 07:44:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204579] Review Request: libatomic_ops - Atomic memory update operations In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609091144.k89Bii4Z023801@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libatomic_ops - Atomic memory update operations https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204579 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-09-09 07:44 EST ------- Looks good, approved! One last remark, you could use %{name}*.h for the header files and plain %{name} for /usr/include/atomic_ops -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 9 11:47:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Sep 2006 07:47:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205878] New: Review Request: arj - Archiver for .arj files Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205878 Summary: Review Request: arj - Archiver for .arj files Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/arj.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/arj-3.10.22-1.src.rpm Description: This package is an open source version of the arj archiver. This version has been created with the intent to preserve maximum compatibility and retain the feature set of original ARJ archiver as provided by ARJ Software, Inc. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 9 12:15:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Sep 2006 08:15:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204700] Review Request: njb-sharp - C# bindings to libnjb In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609091215.k89CF2am024939@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: njb-sharp - C# bindings to libnjb https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204700 alexl at users.sourceforge.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |alexl at users.sourceforge.net ------- Additional Comments From alexl at users.sourceforge.net 2006-09-09 08:14 EST ------- Bug #188218 to update banshee to 0.10.12 would benefit from this package. In the meantime, is it possible to configure banshee without njb support? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 9 12:25:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Sep 2006 08:25:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205023] Review Request: filelight-1.0 - cool diskspace use browser for kde In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609091225.k89CP1fU025195@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: filelight-1.0 - cool diskspace use browser for kde https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205023 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-09-09 08:24 EST ------- > Sorry for hijacking this review No prob. > Use desktop-file-install as documented The most important thing is that .desktop files *not* be renamed, and adding --vendor-fedora does that. --vendor=fedora is only appropriate if upstream doesn't (already) provide a .desktop file. *sigh*, OK, I'll bite the bullet and take this to the Packaging comittee to get the guidelines updated to reflect reality. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 9 12:34:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Sep 2006 08:34:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 195223] Review Request: pavucontrol: Volume control for PulseAudio In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609091234.k89CYv2i025455@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pavucontrol: Volume control for PulseAudio https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195223 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-09-09 08:34 EST ------- One possible simplification is replace in %files: %dir %{_datadir}/pavucontrol %{_datadir}/pavucontrol/pavucontrol.glade with %{_datadir}/pavucontrol/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 9 12:36:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Sep 2006 08:36:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 195223] Review Request: pavucontrol: Volume control for PulseAudio In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609091236.k89CaAAp025505@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pavucontrol: Volume control for PulseAudio https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195223 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-09-09 08:36 EST ------- mock builds fine, rpmlint is happy: $rpmlint pavucontrol-0.9.4-2.fc6.i386.rpm 386.rpm W: pavucontrol incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.9.4-2 0.9.4-2.fc6 APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 9 12:55:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Sep 2006 08:55:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205023] Review Request: filelight-1.0 - cool diskspace use browser for kde In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609091255.k89CtSbe026461@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: filelight-1.0 - cool diskspace use browser for kde https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205023 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-09-09 08:55 EST ------- (In reply to comment #20) > The most important thing is that .desktop files *not* be renamed, and adding > --vendor-fedora does that. --vendor=fedora is only appropriate if upstream > doesn't (already) provide a .desktop file. > > *sigh*, OK, I'll bite the bullet and take this to the Packaging comittee to get > the guidelines updated to reflect reality. > Ah I see, the desktop file is already installed, in that case Neal instead of not renaming you should add --delete-original to the desktop-file-install cmdline. Atleast until the packaging comittee changes the guidelines on this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 9 14:07:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Sep 2006 10:07:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 195222] Review Request: paman: Management tool for PulseAudio In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609091407.k89E7A21028460@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: paman: Management tool for PulseAudio https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195222 bdpepple at ameritech.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at ameritech.net 2006-09-09 10:06 EST ------- Ok, this looks good. All blocker issues have been resolved. +1 Approve. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 9 14:18:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Sep 2006 10:18:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198089] Review Request: padevchooser: Control applet for PulseAudio In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609091418.k89EIgNv028763@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: padevchooser: Control applet for PulseAudio https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198089 bdpepple at ameritech.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |bdpepple at ameritech.net OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at ameritech.net 2006-09-09 10:18 EST ------- Couple of quick note: 1. You have an ownership problem with the '%{_datadir}/padevchooser' directory. 2. Your missing a BR on desktop-file-utils. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 9 14:20:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Sep 2006 10:20:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198088] Review Request: pavumeter: Volume meter for PulseAudio In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609091420.k89EKgmQ028849@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pavumeter: Volume meter for PulseAudio https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198088 bdpepple at ameritech.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |bdpepple at ameritech.net OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at ameritech.net 2006-09-09 10:20 EST ------- Quick note: 1. The desktop file for this package is not handled correctly. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-254ddf07aae20a23ced8cecc219d8f73926e9755 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 9 14:25:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Sep 2006 10:25:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197847] Review Request: pymsnt - MSN Transport for Jabber Servers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609091425.k89EPs9q029054@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pymsnt - MSN Transport for Jabber Servers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197847 ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at ameritech.net 2006-09-09 10:25 EST ------- You should be able to simplify the %files section, since python packages no longer ghost *.pyo files. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Python#head-e48d83dfeb5e671e2018d361d6e75d7e6c6e519c -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 9 14:33:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Sep 2006 10:33:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198088] Review Request: pavumeter: Volume meter for PulseAudio In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609091433.k89EXl7t029257@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pavumeter: Volume meter for PulseAudio https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198088 ------- Additional Comments From drzeus-bugzilla at drzeus.cx 2006-09-09 10:33 EST ------- Spec URL: http://homes.drzeus.cx/~drzeus/pulseaudio/pavumeter.spec SRPM URL: http://homes.drzeus.cx/~drzeus/pulseaudio/pavumeter-0.9.2-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 9 14:34:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Sep 2006 10:34:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198089] Review Request: padevchooser: Control applet for PulseAudio In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609091434.k89EYsM1029307@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: padevchooser: Control applet for PulseAudio https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198089 ------- Additional Comments From drzeus-bugzilla at drzeus.cx 2006-09-09 10:34 EST ------- Spec URL: http://homes.drzeus.cx/~drzeus/pulseaudio/padevchooser.spec SRPM URL: http://homes.drzeus.cx/~drzeus/pulseaudio/padevchooser-0.9.3-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 9 15:03:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Sep 2006 11:03:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197420] Review Request: php-pear-Payment-Process - PEAR: Unified payment processor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609091503.k89F3mZB030103@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Payment-Process - PEAR: Unified payment processor Alias: pear-Payment-Process https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197420 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-09-09 11:03 EST ------- I guess you have a redundant Requires: php there. * source files match upstream: d63b822c194775f5dd3cbd23fb500322 Payment_Process-0.6.5.tgz * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * dist tag is present. * build root is correct. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. License text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * package installs properly * rpmlint is silent (except for that bogus warning) * final provides and requires are sane: php-pear(Payment_Process) = 0.6.5 php-pear-Payment-Process = 0.6.5-1.fc6 = /bin/sh /usr/bin/pear ? php php-pear(Net_Curl) >= 1.2.0 php-pear(PEAR) php-pear(Validate) >= 0.5.0 php-pear(Validate_Finance_CreditCard) >= 0.5.0 php-pear(XML_Parser) >= 1.2.6 * %check is not present; no test suite upstream. * package is not relocatable. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * scriptlets OK (PEAR module installation) * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 9 15:10:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Sep 2006 11:10:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198088] Review Request: pavumeter: Volume meter for PulseAudio In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609091510.k89FAg6a030321@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pavumeter: Volume meter for PulseAudio https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198088 bdpepple at ameritech.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at ameritech.net 2006-09-09 11:10 EST ------- MD5Sums: 03e72b8e3f653d6af5b2be64b5d593d9 pavumeter-0.9.2.tar.gz Good: * Source URL is canonical * Upstream source tarball verified * Package name conforms to the Fedora Naming Guidelines * Group Tag is from the official list * Buildroot has all required elements * All paths begin with macros * All directories are owned by this or other packages * All necessary BuildRequires listed. * All desired features are enabled * Make succeeds even when %{_smp_mflags} is defined * Package builds in Mock. * rpmlint produces no errors. +1 Approve -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 9 15:24:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Sep 2006 11:24:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192600] Review Request: sflowtool - Command line utility for analyzing sFlow data In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609091524.k89FOD5h030724@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sflowtool - Command line utility for analyzing sFlow data https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192600 ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2006-09-09 11:24 EST ------- Well, this is definitely not BSD. Sending it off to the FSF for their thoughts. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 9 15:36:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Sep 2006 11:36:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200436] Review Request: gaim-gadugadu - Gadu-Gadu support in Gaim IM client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609091536.k89FaUZR031032@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gaim-gadugadu - Gadu-Gadu support in Gaim IM client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200436 raven at pmail.pl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 9 15:42:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Sep 2006 11:42:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192600] Review Request: sflowtool - Command line utility for analyzing sFlow data In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609091542.k89FgaT4031335@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sflowtool - Command line utility for analyzing sFlow data https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192600 ------- Additional Comments From andreas at bawue.net 2006-09-09 11:42 EST ------- Thx for forwarding it to the FSF. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 9 15:44:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Sep 2006 11:44:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205884] New: Review Request: perl-Email-Valid - Check validity of internet email address Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205884 Summary: Review Request: perl-Email-Valid - Check validity of internet email address Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: tcallawa at redhat.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/perl-Email-Valid.spec SRPM URL: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/perl-Email-Valid-0.176-1.src.rpm Description: This module determines whether an email address is well-formed, and optionally, whether a mail host exists for the domain or whether the top level domain of the email address is valid. New requirement for perl-Maypole. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 9 15:46:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Sep 2006 11:46:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205885] New: Review Request: perl-CGI-Untaint-email - Validate an email address Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205885 Summary: Review Request: perl-CGI-Untaint-email - Validate an email address Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: tcallawa at redhat.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/perl-CGI-Untaint-email.spec SRPM URL: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/perl-CGI-Untaint-email-0.03-1.src.rpm Description: Validate an email address New requirement for perl-Maypole. Depends on perl-Email-Valid (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205884). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 9 15:47:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Sep 2006 11:47:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189184] Review Request: perl-Email-Valid - check validity of email addresses In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609091547.k89FllP6031569@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Email-Valid - check validity of email addresses https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189184 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|NOTABUG |DUPLICATE ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-09-09 11:47 EST ------- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 205884 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 9 15:47:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Sep 2006 11:47:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205884] Review Request: perl-Email-Valid - Check validity of internet email address In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609091547.k89FlwKv031583@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Email-Valid - Check validity of internet email address https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205884 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |chrisw at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-09-09 11:47 EST ------- *** Bug 189184 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 9 15:48:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Sep 2006 11:48:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205886] New: Review Request: perl-File-MMagic-XS - Guess file type with XS Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205886 Summary: Review Request: perl-File-MMagic-XS - Guess file type with XS Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: tcallawa at redhat.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/perl-File-MMagic-XS.spec SRPM URL: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/perl-File-MMagic-XS-0.08-1.src.rpm Description: This is a port of Apache2 mod_mime_magic.c in Perl, written in XS with the aim of being efficient and fast especially for applications that need to be run for an extended amount of time. New requirement for perl-Maypole. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 9 15:50:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Sep 2006 11:50:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205887] New: Review Request: perl-HTTP-Body - HTTP Body Parser Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205887 Summary: Review Request: perl-HTTP-Body - HTTP Body Parser Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: tcallawa at redhat.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/perl-HTTP-Body.spec SRPM URL: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/perl-HTTP-Body-0.6-1.src.rpm Description: HTTP Body Parser New requirement for perl-Maypole. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 9 16:03:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Sep 2006 12:03:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198089] Review Request: padevchooser: Control applet for PulseAudio In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609091603.k89G3xFt032188@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: padevchooser: Control applet for PulseAudio https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198089 bdpepple at ameritech.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at ameritech.net 2006-09-09 12:03 EST ------- MD5Sums: 6a9b52ad349f3fb3d5a3ccdf85958710 padevchooser-0.9.3.tar.gz Good: * Source URL is canonical * Upstream source tarball verified * Package name conforms to the Fedora Naming Guidelines * Group Tag is from the official list * Buildroot has all required elements * All paths begin with macros * All directories are owned by this or other packages * All necessary BuildRequires listed. * All desired features are enabled * Make succeeds even when %{_smp_mflags} is defined * Package builds in Mock. * rpmlint produces no errors. Minor: * Duplicate BuildRequires: gtk2-devel (provided by libglade2-devel) +1 Approve -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 9 16:04:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Sep 2006 12:04:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 170303] Review Request: google-perftools: Very fast malloc & performance analysis tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609091604.k89G4TA8032238@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: google-perftools: Very fast malloc & performance analysis tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=170303 ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2006-09-09 12:04 EST ------- Still failing on FC-6. Filed another bug upstream. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 9 16:08:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Sep 2006 12:08:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197420] Review Request: php-pear-Payment-Process - PEAR: Unified payment processor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609091608.k89G8qZe032344@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Payment-Process - PEAR: Unified payment processor Alias: pear-Payment-Process https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197420 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 9 16:09:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Sep 2006 12:09:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205878] Review Request: arj - Archiver for .arj files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609091609.k89G9jBl032382@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: arj - Archiver for .arj files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205878 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-09-09 12:09 EST ------- This looks quick and simple. The only thing I wonder is whether it might be useful to package up some bits so that the desktops can handle these files. It looks like KDE is already set up to at least recognize these files. * source files match upstream: 48d2275b8a8e6e5adaead8916d008fd3 arj_3.10.22-2.diff.gz f263bf3cf6d42a8b7e85b4fb514336d3 arj-3.10.22.tar.gz * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * dist tag is present. * build root is correct. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. License text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * compiler flags are appropriate. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * package installs properly * debuginfo package looks complete. * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: arjcrypt.so()(64bit) config(arj) = 3.10.22-1.fc6 unarj = 3.10.22-1.fc6 arj = 3.10.22-1.fc6 = /bin/sh config(arj) = 3.10.22-1.fc6 * %check is not present; no test suite upstream. * no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. * package is not relocatable. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no libtool .la droppings. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 9 16:19:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Sep 2006 12:19:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205884] Review Request: perl-Email-Valid - Check validity of internet email address In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609091619.k89GJTkt032745@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Email-Valid - Check validity of internet email address https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205884 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-09-09 12:19 EST ------- This fails to build in the same way that bug 189184 fails; missing build requirements kill the test suite. I suggest adding BR: perl(Test::Pod) and perl(Test::Pod::Coverage) to get some additional test suite coverage, and bind-utils so that the test suite doesn't die due to lack of nslookup. This stikk skips a bunch of tests for some reason, but it allows the package to build. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 9 16:31:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Sep 2006 12:31:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205885] Review Request: perl-CGI-Untaint-email - Validate an email address In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609091631.k89GV3Sr000638@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-CGI-Untaint-email - Validate an email address https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205885 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |205884 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 9 16:31:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Sep 2006 12:31:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205884] Review Request: perl-Email-Valid - Check validity of internet email address In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609091631.k89GVPl6000674@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Email-Valid - Check validity of internet email address https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205884 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |205885 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 9 16:37:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Sep 2006 12:37:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205886] Review Request: perl-File-MMagic-XS - Guess file type with XS In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609091637.k89GbgSi000982@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-File-MMagic-XS - Guess file type with XS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205886 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 9 16:53:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Sep 2006 12:53:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205891] New: Review Request: rpl - Intelligent recursive search/replace utility Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205891 Summary: Review Request: rpl - Intelligent recursive search/replace utility Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rpm at timj.co.uk QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.timj.co.uk/linux/specs/rpl.spec SRPM URL: http://www.timj.co.uk/linux/srpms/rpl-1.5.3-1.src.rpm Description: rpl is a UN*X text replacement utility. It will replace strings with new strings in multiple text files. It can work recursively over directories and supports limiting the search to specific file suffixes. rpl was originally written by Joe Laffey; this is a rewritten version. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 9 16:55:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Sep 2006 12:55:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205891] Review Request: rpl - Intelligent recursive search/replace utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609091655.k89GtkIp001530@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rpl - Intelligent recursive search/replace utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205891 ------- Additional Comments From rpm at timj.co.uk 2006-09-09 12:55 EST ------- rpmlint is silent on both source and noarch packages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 9 17:33:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Sep 2006 13:33:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193898] Review Request: Jython - Java source interpreter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609091733.k89HXg8j002687@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Jython - Java source interpreter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193898 ------- Additional Comments From ifoox at redhat.com 2006-09-09 13:33 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > (In reply to comment #4) > > > - Change Group to Development/Libraries > > Fixed. > > I'm sorry. This was another mistake of mine. It should be "System > Environment/Libraries". Seems like System/Environment/Libraries is less appropriate for jython than Development/Libraries or even Development/Languages. Why do you say that System/Environment/Libraries is the correct one? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 9 17:36:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Sep 2006 13:36:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205886] Review Request: perl-File-MMagic-XS - Guess file type with XS In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609091736.k89HaLTR002796@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-File-MMagic-XS - Guess file type with XS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205886 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-09-09 13:36 EST ------- rpmlint says: W: perl-File-MMagic-XS invalid-license Apache rpmlint would prefer "Apache Software License". E: perl-File-MMagic-XS useless-explicit-provides perl(File::MMagic::XS) Another rpm screwup; somehow it adds the module twice to the provides list, both with and without a version. In the past this has always required a filter. Returning to the subject of the license, I'm not sure that it's clear that the entire package is under the Apache license. The parts that came from Apache are clear, the public domain parts are indicated as such, but some of it is just "All rights reserved" (see lib/File/MMagic/XS.pm) which seems problematic. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 9 17:39:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Sep 2006 13:39:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193898] Review Request: Jython - Java source interpreter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609091739.k89HdRMq002981@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Jython - Java source interpreter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193898 ------- Additional Comments From green at redhat.com 2006-09-09 13:39 EST ------- (In reply to comment #6) > Seems like System/Environment/Libraries is less appropriate for jython than > Development/Libraries or even Development/Languages. Development/Libraries doesn't really apply to Java, since it's for .so files and other things you would only use at build-time. I think you're right about Development/Languages though. Let's use that one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 9 17:46:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Sep 2006 13:46:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205887] Review Request: perl-HTTP-Body - HTTP Body Parser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609091746.k89Hkxnl003271@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-HTTP-Body - HTTP Body Parser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205887 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 9 17:59:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Sep 2006 13:59:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205891] Review Request: rpl - Intelligent recursive search/replace utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609091759.k89HxURb003570@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rpl - Intelligent recursive search/replace utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205891 ------- Additional Comments From dan at danny.cz 2006-09-09 13:59 EST ------- the mode for the man page rpl.1 should be 0644 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 9 18:04:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Sep 2006 14:04:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 195222] Review Request: paman: Management tool for PulseAudio In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609091804.k89I4A0s003741@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: paman: Management tool for PulseAudio https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195222 drzeus-bugzilla at drzeus.cx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 9 18:05:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Sep 2006 14:05:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 195223] Review Request: pavucontrol: Volume control for PulseAudio In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609091805.k89I5NLh003802@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pavucontrol: Volume control for PulseAudio https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195223 drzeus-bugzilla at drzeus.cx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 9 18:06:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Sep 2006 14:06:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198088] Review Request: pavumeter: Volume meter for PulseAudio In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609091806.k89I6tam003866@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pavumeter: Volume meter for PulseAudio https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198088 drzeus-bugzilla at drzeus.cx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 9 18:08:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Sep 2006 14:08:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198089] Review Request: padevchooser: Control applet for PulseAudio In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609091808.k89I83be003918@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: padevchooser: Control applet for PulseAudio https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198089 drzeus-bugzilla at drzeus.cx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 9 18:10:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Sep 2006 14:10:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204579] Review Request: libatomic_ops - Atomic memory update operations In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609091810.k89IABWd003996@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libatomic_ops - Atomic memory update operations https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204579 drzeus-bugzilla at drzeus.cx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 9 18:13:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Sep 2006 14:13:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205891] Review Request: rpl - Intelligent recursive search/replace utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609091813.k89ID4UD004186@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rpl - Intelligent recursive search/replace utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205891 ------- Additional Comments From rpm at timj.co.uk 2006-09-09 14:12 EST ------- Of course it should. Sorry about that stupid bug. Spec URL: http://www.timj.co.uk/linux/specs/rpl.spec SRPM URL: http://www.timj.co.uk/linux/srpms/rpl-1.5.3-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 9 18:19:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Sep 2006 14:19:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193898] Review Request: Jython - Java source interpreter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609091819.k89IJWZR004668@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Jython - Java source interpreter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193898 ------- Additional Comments From ifoox at redhat.com 2006-09-09 14:19 EST ------- (In reply to comment #7) >I think you're right about > Development/Languages though. Let's use that one. OK. Another important issue which I'm not sure how to address is the license. The license file calls it the 'Jython license' (http://www.jython.org/Project/license.html), but there is not equivalent appropriate license that rpmlint likes. What do we do in a case like this? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 9 18:25:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Sep 2006 14:25:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205891] Review Request: rpl - Intelligent recursive search/replace utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609091825.k89IPA4e005090@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rpl - Intelligent recursive search/replace utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205891 ------- Additional Comments From dan at danny.cz 2006-09-09 14:25 EST ------- I have looked at the Requires of the built package and there is only /usr/bin/env found by rpmbuild process (it is after #! in the beginning of the script). There should be "python" too. A simple solution could be a change of the first line of script and adding it as a patch. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 9 18:34:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Sep 2006 14:34:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193898] Review Request: Jython - Java source interpreter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609091834.k89IY5l3005776@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Jython - Java source interpreter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193898 ------- Additional Comments From ifoox at redhat.com 2006-09-09 14:33 EST ------- New files: http://people.redhat.com/ifoox/extras/jython-2.2-0.a0.2jpp_3fc.src.rpm http://people.redhat.com/ifoox/extras/jython.spec There are currently 3 issues remaining with the package (that I know of) 1. License (comment #8): W: jython invalid-license Modified CNRI Open Source License 2. Copying files from python: For some reason the jython buildsystem copies some files from the python standard library into it's own directory. Since I made it use the system python instead of the python2.2 that was previously included, we now have duplication. These are the files that also produce permission errors from rpmlint: E: jython non-executable-script /usr/share/jython/Lib/uu.py 0644 This is because they are not executable but contain a #!. I'll try to figure out why jython copies these files and if we can make it use the ones in %{_libdir}/python2.4/site-packages instead. If not I'll see if I can symlink them instead of copying. 3. Missing jar manifest in one of the demo jars: E: jython-demo no-jar-manifest /usr/share/jython/Demo/jreload/example.jar I'm not sure whether this is an important issue since this is just a demo jar, which will probably function without the manifest file anyway. I'll try to resolve issue 2 (and maybe 3) today and tomorrow, but any suggestions are welcome. But I'm really not sure what to do about issue 1. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 9 18:48:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Sep 2006 14:48:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205891] Review Request: rpl - Intelligent recursive search/replace utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609091848.k89ImJul006978@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rpl - Intelligent recursive search/replace utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205891 ------- Additional Comments From rpm at timj.co.uk 2006-09-09 14:48 EST ------- Hmm, yes. I don't really see the point of the "env python" there since no variables are being set. For now I've patched it to remove the "env" (works OK for me) and I've e-mailed the author to ask about the reasoning. New package: Spec URL: http://www.timj.co.uk/linux/specs/rpl.spec SRPM URL: http://www.timj.co.uk/linux/srpms/rpl-1.5.3-3.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 9 19:10:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Sep 2006 15:10:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204421] Review Request: kdetv - KDE application for watching TV In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609091910.k89JAQBE007584@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdetv - KDE application for watching TV https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204421 ------- Additional Comments From packages at amiga-hardware.com 2006-09-09 15:10 EST ------- Thanks for the review, I'll drop that BR before import. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 9 19:19:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Sep 2006 15:19:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205887] Review Request: perl-HTTP-Body - HTTP Body Parser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609091919.k89JJ0J5007927@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-HTTP-Body - HTTP Body Parser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205887 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-09-09 15:18 EST ------- The %description is a bit lacking, but the package doesn't Some checks are skipped due to missingg BuildRequires; suggest adding perl(Test::Pod) and perl(Test::Pod::Coverage). Some of your explicit Requires: duplicate the ones that rpm finds: perl(Carp), perl(File::Temp) >= 0.14, perl(IO::File). * source files match upstream: e7f5963abece523dd9be27db3d37aaea HTTP-Body-0.6.tar.gz * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * dist tag is present. * build root is correct. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. License text not included upstream. * latest version is being packaged. X BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * package installs properly * rpmlint is silent. X final provides and requires are sane: perl(HTTP::Body) = 0.6 perl(HTTP::Body::MultiPart) perl(HTTP::Body::OctetStream) perl(HTTP::Body::UrlEncoded) perl-HTTP-Body = 0.6-1.fc6 = perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8) perl(Carp) X perl(Carp) perl(File::Temp) >= 0.14 X perl(File::Temp) >= 0.14 perl(HTTP::Body::MultiPart) perl(HTTP::Body::OctetStream) perl(HTTP::Body::UrlEncoded) perl(IO::File) X perl(IO::File) perl(YAML) >= 0.39 perl(base) perl(bytes) perl(strict) X %check is present but some tests are skipped due to missing BuildRequires: All tests successful, 2 tests skipped. Files=6, Tests=69, 1 wallclock secs ( 0.47 cusr + 0.12 csys = 0.59 CPU) * package is not relocatable. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 9 19:33:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Sep 2006 15:33:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205887] Review Request: perl-HTTP-Body - HTTP Body Parser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609091933.k89JXAOg008349@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-HTTP-Body - HTTP Body Parser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205887 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-09-09 15:32 EST ------- Ummm... >The %description is a bit lacking, but the package doesn't include any additional descriptive text that you could use. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 9 19:43:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Sep 2006 15:43:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201674] Review Request: codeblocks In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609091943.k89JhiZX008569@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: codeblocks https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201674 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |tibbs at math.uh.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 9 19:55:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Sep 2006 15:55:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200941] Review Request: SooperLooper, a realtime software looping sampler (&Jack client) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609091955.k89Jthlp008931@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: SooperLooper, a realtime software looping sampler (&Jack client) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200941 ------- Additional Comments From nando at ccrma.stanford.edu 2006-09-09 15:55 EST ------- (In reply to comment #16) > I think there are only a couple of minor issues. See the lines that start with > 'X'. This assumes the tweaks in my uploaded spec file are accepted. > > X BuildRequires are almost proper. > - Look at the changes I made in the spec file I attached in Comment #14 to > handle FC releases > 5. Should this be "%{fedora}" >= 4 or just ommit it? I think current Fedora Extras for 4 and 5 has wxGTK as the name of the package with the proper obsoletes/provides for wxGTK2, right? Is this the version being used by your build system? > * rpmlint says: > W: sooperlooper mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs > I just use the emacs untabify command to clean these things up. Fixed now in my copy, thanks. > X Should Require hicolor-icon-theme since it places an icon in a directory owned > by that package. This is something I just learned about myself, and plan on > cleaning up my old packages. First time I hear about this. Makes sense as this is not something that could be done automatically by rpm, right? Lots of packages will need this... > X .desktop file is installed properly, but should refer to "SooperLooper", not > "Sooperlooper". Fixed, thanks again. I'll wait to hear from you on the wxGTK/wxGTK2 name before releasing another spec/srpm. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 9 23:14:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Sep 2006 19:14:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 185423] Review Request: php-pear-PEAR-Command-Packaging: make-rpm-spec command for PEAR In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609092314.k89NEpUi013688@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-PEAR-Command-Packaging: make-rpm-spec command for PEAR Alias: php-pear-PCP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=185423 ------- Additional Comments From rpm at timj.co.uk 2006-09-09 19:14 EST ------- I have updated the package to support the latest template as generated by rpmdevtools-5.1-1 (build Sat 09 Sep 2006 06:05:21) from bug #198706. http://www.timj.co.uk/linux/specs/php-pear-PEAR-Command-Packaging.spec http://www.timj.co.uk/linux/srpms/php-pear-PEAR-Command-Packaging-0.1.2-2.src.rpm The package is now effectively self-consistent; if you install it and do "pear makerpm PEAR_Command_Packaging-0.1.2.tgz" then the output spec file you get is very similar to the one used to build the package itself. (It doesn't of course have the patches, but mostly the differences are trivial) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 9 23:55:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Sep 2006 19:55:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201674] Review Request: codeblocks In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609092355.k89Ntp3M014713@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: codeblocks https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201674 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-09-09 19:55 EST ------- I can't check the upstream source. Could you provide a quick script in the package for grabbing the source from the repository and generating the tarball? I know if won't compare the same due to directory timestamps but I can at least do a recursive diff. Any reason why you don't use the %configure macro instead of listing out that long configure line? /usr/lib64/codeblocks seems to be unowned. You don't seem to install the desktop file properly. Generally you should use desktop-file-install. X source files match upstream (can't check) * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * dist tag is present. * build root is correct. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. License text included in package. * BuildRequires are proper. * compiler flags are appropriate. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * package installs properly * debuginfo package looks complete. * rpmlint has only ignorable complaints. * final provides and requires are sane: codeblocks-1.0-0.7.20060902svn2944.fc6.x86_64.rpm libastyle.so()(64bit) libautosave.so()(64bit) libclasswizard.so()(64bit) libcodeblocks.so.0()(64bit) libcodecompletion.so()(64bit) libcompiler.so()(64bit) libdebuggergdb.so()(64bit) libdefaultmimehandler.so()(64bit) libscriptedwizard.so()(64bit) libtodo.so()(64bit) codeblocks = 1.0-0.7.20060902svn2944.fc6 = /sbin/ldconfig libatk-1.0.so.0()(64bit) libcairo.so.2()(64bit) libcodeblocks.so.0()(64bit) libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libglib-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgmodule-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgobject-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libpango-1.0.so.0()(64bit) libpangocairo-1.0.so.0()(64bit) libwx_baseu-2.6.so.0()(64bit) libwx_baseu-2.6.so.0(WXU_2.6)(64bit) libwx_baseu_net-2.6.so.0()(64bit) libwx_baseu_net-2.6.so.0(WXU_2.6)(64bit) libwx_baseu_xml-2.6.so.0()(64bit) libwx_baseu_xml-2.6.so.0(WXU_2.6)(64bit) libwx_gtk2u_adv-2.6.so.0()(64bit) libwx_gtk2u_adv-2.6.so.0(WXU_2.6)(64bit) libwx_gtk2u_core-2.6.so.0()(64bit) libwx_gtk2u_core-2.6.so.0(WXU_2.6)(64bit) libwx_gtk2u_core-2.6.so.0(WXU_2.6.2)(64bit) libwx_gtk2u_core-2.6.so.0(WXU_2.6.3)(64bit) libwx_gtk2u_html-2.6.so.0()(64bit) libwx_gtk2u_html-2.6.so.0(WXU_2.6)(64bit) libwx_gtk2u_qa-2.6.so.0()(64bit) libwx_gtk2u_qa-2.6.so.0(WXU_2.6)(64bit) libwx_gtk2u_xrc-2.6.so.0()(64bit) libwx_gtk2u_xrc-2.6.so.0(WXU_2.6)(64bit) codeblocks-contrib-1.0-0.7.20060902svn2944.fc6.x86_64.rpm libbyogames.so()(64bit) libcb_koders.so()(64bit) libcodesnippets.so()(64bit) libcodestat.so()(64bit) libdragscroll.so()(64bit) libenvvars.so()(64bit) libexporter.so()(64bit) libhelp_plugin.so()(64bit) libkeybinder.so()(64bit) libprofiler.so()(64bit) libwxsmith.so()(64bit) codeblocks-contrib = 1.0-0.7.20060902svn2944.fc6 = codeblocks = 1.0-0.7.20060902svn2944.fc6 libcodeblocks.so.0()(64bit) libwx_baseu-2.6.so.0()(64bit) libwx_baseu-2.6.so.0(WXU_2.6)(64bit) libwx_baseu_net-2.6.so.0()(64bit) libwx_baseu_xml-2.6.so.0()(64bit) libwx_gtk2u_adv-2.6.so.0()(64bit) libwx_gtk2u_adv-2.6.so.0(WXU_2.6)(64bit) libwx_gtk2u_core-2.6.so.0()(64bit) libwx_gtk2u_core-2.6.so.0(WXU_2.6)(64bit) libwx_gtk2u_core-2.6.so.0(WXU_2.6.2)(64bit) libwx_gtk2u_html-2.6.so.0()(64bit) libwx_gtk2u_html-2.6.so.0(WXU_2.6)(64bit) libwx_gtk2u_qa-2.6.so.0()(64bit) libwx_gtk2u_xrc-2.6.so.0()(64bit) libwx_gtk2u_xrc-2.6.so.0(WXU_2.6)(64bit) codeblocks-devel-1.0-0.7.20060902svn2944.fc6.x86_64.rpm codeblocks-devel = 1.0-0.7.20060902svn2944.fc6 = codeblocks = 1.0-0.7.20060902svn2944.fc6 libcodeblocks.so.0()(64bit) pkgconfig * %check is not present; no test suite upstream. * shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths; ldconfig is called as necessary and unversioned .so files are in the -devel package. * package is not relocatable. X owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * scriptlets OK (ldconfig) * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * header files are content used by the package. * pkgconfig file is in the -devel package. * no libtool .la droppings. X desktop file does not seem to be installed properly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 10 00:06:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Sep 2006 20:06:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204417] Review Request: telepathy-gabble - A Jabber/XMPP connection manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609100006.k8A06lVe015028@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: telepathy-gabble - A Jabber/XMPP connection manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204417 bdpepple at ameritech.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 10 00:10:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Sep 2006 20:10:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205891] Review Request: rpl - Intelligent recursive search/replace utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609100010.k8A0AvIZ015096@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rpl - Intelligent recursive search/replace utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205891 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-09-09 20:10 EST ------- The reason env is used is that it will search PATH to find the command it is given. This means that you don't have to edit your scripts if python is in /usr/bin/python or /usr/local/bin/python or whatever. It has, as far as I know, always been common practise for python scripts to be called this way. In general I think it would be better to add Requires: python rather than patch the source, but I suppose either method works. I'm happy to go ahead and review this, unless Dan wants to. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 10 00:29:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Sep 2006 20:29:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189150] Review Request: mod_mono In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609100029.k8A0TTK2015486@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mod_mono https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189150 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-09-09 20:29 EST ------- All the inital items seem to be fixed up... you do now seem to have two Source0 lines: Source0: http://go-mono.com/sources-latest/ Source0: http://go-mono.com/sources/%{name}/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz The first one of those should be the URL: tag. Provided you fix that up, I'm happy to APPROVE this package. Don't forget to close this bug NEXTRELEASE once it's been imported and built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 10 00:34:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Sep 2006 20:34:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 185423] Review Request: php-pear-PEAR-Command-Packaging: make-rpm-spec command for PEAR In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609100034.k8A0YxZq015654@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-PEAR-Command-Packaging: make-rpm-spec command for PEAR Alias: php-pear-PCP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=185423 ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2006-09-09 20:34 EST ------- Tim, the spec file in the srpm is not the same as the other spec file and contains some errors and ommissions. >From the other spec file, please remove the "PEAR:" from the summary, use install -pm 644 instead of cp in %install, set %setup section does not match the template although not technically necessary. Please shorten description to just the first paragraph, %build is missing a cd from the template, but not technically required. Please include a copy of the php license in %doc. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 10 00:37:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Sep 2006 20:37:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196847] Review Request: php-pear-PHPUnit2 - PEAR: Regression testing framework for unit tests In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609100037.k8A0b2IP015790@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-PHPUnit2 - PEAR: Regression testing framework for unit tests Alias: php-pear-PHPUnit2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196847 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |tibbs at math.uh.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-09-09 20:36 EST ------- I'll go ahead and review this one, but I'll leave the other version of this package alone because frankly I don't think it's a terribly good idea to include multiple versions in the same repository in that manner. It's up to you how you do version upgrades; if the new version is that much better or more useful and isn't unstable then I'd just upgrade to it immediately. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 10 00:40:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Sep 2006 20:40:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 185423] Review Request: php-pear-PEAR-Command-Packaging: make-rpm-spec command for PEAR In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609100040.k8A0eeNn015943@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-PEAR-Command-Packaging: make-rpm-spec command for PEAR Alias: php-pear-PCP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=185423 ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2006-09-09 20:40 EST ------- Oh I see, you linked to version 2 above, I got version 3. Other comments: Remove requires on php, this is not needed if php < 5. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 10 00:42:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Sep 2006 20:42:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196847] Review Request: php-pear-PHPUnit2 - PEAR: Regression testing framework for unit tests In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609100042.k8A0geoB016006@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-PHPUnit2 - PEAR: Regression testing framework for unit tests Alias: php-pear-PHPUnit2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196847 ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2006-09-09 20:42 EST ------- please review the alpha version if you are just going to review one. This one is not important to me, the alpha version one I need in FE. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 10 00:58:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Sep 2006 20:58:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199679] Review Request: pgpool - Connection pooling/replication server for PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609100058.k8A0w5cQ016304@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pgpool - Connection pooling/replication server for PostgreSQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199679 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |kevin at tummy.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-09-09 20:57 EST ------- See below - Package name OK - Spec file matches base package name. OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines. OK - License (BSD) OK - License field in spec matches OK - License file included in package OK - Spec in American English OK - Spec is legible. OK - Sources match upstream md5sum: 8adb39f18780a93e4b2ac0e31364314d pgpool-3.1.1.tar.gz 8adb39f18780a93e4b2ac0e31364314d pgpool-3.1.1.tar.gz.1 OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch. OK - BuildRequires correct OK - Package owns all the directories it creates. OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files. OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. OK - Package has a correct %clean section. OK - Spec has consistant macro usage. OK - Package is code or permissible content. OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime. OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. See below - No rpmlint output. SHOULD Items: OK - Should include License or ask upstream to include it. OK - Should build in mock. Issues: 1. Should this package be named 'postgresql-pgpool', since it "enhances or adds a new functionality to an existing Fedora Core or Fedora Extras package without being useful on its own" 2. rpmlint says: W: pgpool incoherent-version-in-changelog 3.1.1-4 3.1.1-3.fc6 Might fix the changelog to not have .fc6 in it. (minor). 3. I'd have to agree with the point in comment #9 about the /etc/pgpool.conf.sample file. You should either construct a /etc/pgpool.conf file for there, or ship no config file and put the .sample file under doc or the like. Looking at that file I think you could just install it as /etc/pgpool.conf and let the end user modify it if they have a diffrent config. 4. Is the "Requires: postgresql-server" correct? Couldn't this run on a machine with no local postgresql-server installed, talking to remote machines with it installed? 5. In agreement with comment #9 again, you shouldn't need to pass anything to the %configure macro. You have: %configure --sysconfdir=%{_sysconfdir} --mandir=%{_mandir} --libdir=%{_libdir} but %configure expands to a configure call that already passes all those values. You can simply have: %configure See /usr/lib/rpm/macros for more information. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 10 00:59:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Sep 2006 20:59:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 185423] Review Request: php-pear-PEAR-Command-Packaging: make-rpm-spec command for PEAR In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609100059.k8A0xN08016361@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-PEAR-Command-Packaging: make-rpm-spec command for PEAR Alias: php-pear-PCP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=185423 ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2006-09-09 20:59 EST ------- I checked out the version 3. Please remove "PEAR:" from the summary in the template.spec, also I'm not sure why you have BuildArch in the template.spec because all pear packages are noarch. rpmlint doesnt like Source1 ending in .spec, can you rename this to something that doesnt end in .spec? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 10 01:20:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Sep 2006 21:20:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 185423] Review Request: php-pear-PEAR-Command-Packaging: make-rpm-spec command for PEAR In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609100120.k8A1Kkqk016831@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-PEAR-Command-Packaging: make-rpm-spec command for PEAR Alias: php-pear-PCP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=185423 ------- Additional Comments From rpm at timj.co.uk 2006-09-09 21:20 EST ------- Sorry about the version number cock-up. > Please remove "PEAR:" from the summary in the template.spec I've debated with myself about this one and put it in/took it out several times. My general feeling is that it gives the "right" answer more times with it in than out. For example, PEAR::DB has "Database Abstraction Layer" as its summary from the XML. "PEAR: Database Abstraction Layer" makes more sense to me. Ditto for various other packages. See also owners.list for other PEAR packages. > also I'm not sure why you have BuildArch in the template.spec > because all pear packages are noarch. Huh? You still need BuildArch in there! See also the rpmdevtools template. If you mean why has it got an expanded @arch@ macro, well: a) it doesn't matter, since the output is what's important b) it matters for PECL. As it happens, you will not currently get a very useful PECL spec out of PCP, but you should do eventually, and ideally the spec template should be shared as much as possible. > Please shorten description to just the first paragraph Done > %build is missing a cd from the template, but not > technically required. Yes, I took it out because it's utterly pointless when there is no build section. Remember: the template is a template, not the finished article. It's intended to have human attention although of course minimising that is a bonus. (The *output* of php-PCP aims to be something slightly closer to the finished article, but even that needs human review) > Please include a copy of the php license in %doc. Done. NB: fixed upstream in CVS. > rpmlint doesnt like Source1 ending in .spec, can you rename this to > something that doesnt end in .spec? Yes, done, though I'm pondering whether this should be filed as an rpmlint bug. New version (with right version number in URL this time): http://www.timj.co.uk/linux/specs/php-pear-PEAR-Command-Packaging.spec http://www.timj.co.uk/linux/srpms/php-pear-PEAR-Command-Packaging-0.1.2-4.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 10 01:22:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Sep 2006 21:22:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203789] Review Request: kshutdown - KShutDown is an advanced shut down utility for KDE. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609100122.k8A1MFnh016875@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kshutdown - KShutDown is an advanced shut down utility for KDE. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203789 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |kevin at tummy.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-09-09 21:22 EST ------- OK - Package name OK - Spec file matches base package name. OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines. OK - License (GPL) OK - License field in spec matches OK - License file included in package OK - Spec in American English OK - Spec is legible. OK - Sources match upstream md5sum: 6acd45acc5c0669b0973f0246e4bcca7 kshutdown-0.8.2.tar.bz2 6acd45acc5c0669b0973f0246e4bcca7 kshutdown-0.8.2.tar.bz2.1 OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch. OK - BuildRequires correct OK - Spec handles locales/find_lang OK - Package owns all the directories it creates. OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files. OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. OK - Package has a correct %clean section. OK - Spec has consistant macro usage. OK - Package is code or permissible content. OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime. OK - .la files are removed. OK - Package is a GUI app and has a .desktop file OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. OK - No rpmlint output. SHOULD Items: OK - Should include License or ask upstream to include it. OK - Should build in mock. Issues: 1. Should look at using a %{?dist} tag. See: http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/DistTag Thats the only issue I see with this package, so it's APPROVED. Please remember to close this bug with NEXTRELEASE once it has been imported and built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 10 01:23:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Sep 2006 21:23:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189195] Review Request: horde - php application framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609100123.k8A1NPoZ016949@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: horde - php application framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189195 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |chris.stone at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2006-09-09 21:23 EST ------- This package needs updating with the Requires, and obviously it does not handle locales properly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 10 01:33:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Sep 2006 21:33:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196101] Review Request: mimedefang In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609100133.k8A1XZ2u017224@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mimedefang https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196101 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-09-09 21:33 EST ------- This fails to build on x86_64 rawhide: configure: WARNING: Oops.. I couldn't find libmilter.a or libmilter.so. Please install Sendmail configure: WARNING: and its libraries. You must run Build in the libmilter/ directory configure: WARNING: to compile libmilter. error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.96120 (%build) /usr/lib64/libmilter.a does exist; I'd guess it's looking in /usr/lib. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 10 01:45:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Sep 2006 21:45:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 185423] Review Request: php-pear-PEAR-Command-Packaging: make-rpm-spec command for PEAR In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609100145.k8A1jlii017779@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-PEAR-Command-Packaging: make-rpm-spec command for PEAR Alias: php-pear-PCP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=185423 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2006-09-09 21:45 EST ------- "PEAR" in the summary doesn't make sense at all. It is already plainly obvious from the package name that it is a pear package. It especially does not make sense for this package. You even mention the word "PEAR" twice in your summary. A summary is supposed to be as short as possible. Even a summary that starts with the word "The" should be shortened. For this summary I would use: Summary: Creates spec files from PEAR modules We definately do not want to have "PEAR:" as a standard in our summaries, and packages that already have it should remove it. ---- >From the BuildArch comment, I meant to say that it didn't make sense to me to specify an arch, in other words, I was saying just hard code BuildArch: noarch. But if this is going to happen automatically anyway that is fine, it was just confusing to me. ---- The reason we add the cd to the %build is incase anyone wants to add something to the %build they will not have to remember to add the cd there. It's definately not required, just mentioning that this was different in your spec vs. the template spec. ---- APPROVED pending the removal of "PEAR:" from Summary field in spec file and template.spec. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 10 01:47:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Sep 2006 21:47:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204884] Review Request: bitlbee - An IRC to other chat networks gateway In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609100147.k8A1lfIN017853@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bitlbee - An IRC to other chat networks gateway https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204884 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |201449 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-09-09 21:47 EST ------- Sorry, guys, but there's no point in having two review tickets open for the same package. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 196591 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 10 01:47:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Sep 2006 21:47:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196591] Review Request: bitlbee In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609100147.k8A1lfcQ017861@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bitlbee https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196591 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |paul at xtdnet.nl ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-09-09 21:47 EST ------- *** Bug 204884 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 10 02:02:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Sep 2006 22:02:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192600] Review Request: sflowtool - Command line utility for analyzing sFlow data In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609100202.k8A22CVo018187@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sflowtool - Command line utility for analyzing sFlow data https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192600 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX OtherBugsDependingO|182235 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2006-09-09 22:02 EST ------- FSF says no: > 2.3 Restrictions. Licensee agrees that it will not use the Software in a way > inconsistent with the license granted in Section 2.1. Further, Licensee agrees > that, in > exercising its rights under the license granted to it in this Agreement, > Licensee will: > (i) strictly adhere to and fully comply with the Specifications; No way. > (ii) use the > Trademark, > and no other mark, to identify the Software, the Documentation, the > Specifications and any > Products that implement the Specifications; Nope. > (iii) place, in a font or graphic > design > designated by InMon, the phrase "sFlow(R)" on any technical documentation, > sales/marketing materials, catalogs, or other such materials relating to > products it > manufactures or markets which it has configured to be compatible with the > Software or > otherwise implement the Specifications; Probably, but not certainly, overbroad. ***** I'm closing this bug out WONTFIX. If you can get this under a different license, please reopen. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 10 02:55:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Sep 2006 22:55:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205300] Review Request: gtk-sharp - a set of mono bindings for gtk1.2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609100255.k8A2tNKv019428@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtk-sharp - a set of mono bindings for gtk1.2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205300 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-09-09 22:55 EST ------- This review has been assigned, but is still in FE-NEW. Do you intend to review it? If not I would be happy to do so... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 10 02:56:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Sep 2006 22:56:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205300] Review Request: gtk-sharp - a set of mono bindings for gtk1.2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609100256.k8A2ulg2019459@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtk-sharp - a set of mono bindings for gtk1.2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205300 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-09-09 22:56 EST ------- FYI, this package fails to build in mock. I get: Patch #0 (gtksharp-libdir.patch): + patch -p1 -b --suffix .libdir -s + autoreconf configure.in:50: error: possibly undefined macro: PKG_PATH If this token and others are legitimate, please use m4_pattern_allow. See the Autoconf documentation. autoreconf: /usr/bin/autoconf failed with exit status: 1 error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.38992 (%prep) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 10 03:14:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Sep 2006 23:14:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205265] Review Request: libxml- Old libXML library for Gnome-1 application compatibility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609100314.k8A3EPqO019860@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libxml- Old libXML library for Gnome-1 application compatibility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205265 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |kevin at tummy.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-09-09 23:14 EST ------- OK - Package name OK - Spec file matches base package name. OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines. OK - License (LGPL) OK - License field in spec matches OK - License file included in package OK - Spec in American English OK - Spec is legible. OK - Sources match upstream md5sum: 53846294aa850a7d042948176d1d19dc libxml-1.8.17.tar.gz 53846294aa850a7d042948176d1d19dc libxml-1.8.17.tar.gz.1 OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch. OK - BuildRequires correct OK - Spec has needed ldconfig in post and postun OK - Package owns all the directories it creates. OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files. OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. OK - Package has a correct %clean section. OK - Spec has consistant macro usage. OK - Package is code or permissible content. OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime. OK - Headers/static libs in -devel subpackage. OK - .so files in -devel subpackage. See below - -devel package Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} OK - .la files are removed. OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. See below - No rpmlint output. SHOULD Items: OK - Should include License or ask upstream to include it. OK - Should build in mock. Issues: 1. If the license is LGPL (as it appears to be), no need to include the COPYING file as that is the GPL. 2. The devel package has: Requires: %{name} = %{epoch}:%{version} That should probibly be: Requires: %{name} = %{epoch}:%{version}-%{release} 3. rpmlint says: E: libxml-devel only-non-binary-in-usr-lib W: libxml-devel no-documentation I think those can both be ignored in this case. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 10 03:20:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Sep 2006 23:20:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205912] New: Review Request: Thunar - Thunar File Manager Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205912 Summary: Review Request: Thunar - Thunar File Manager Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kevin at tummy.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.scrye.com/~kevin/extras/Thunar/Thunar.spec SRPM URL: http://www.scrye.com/~kevin/extras/Thunar/Thunar-0.4.0-0.1.rc1.fc6.src.rpm Description: Thunar is a new modern file manager for the Xfce Desktop Environment. It has been designed from the ground up to be fast and easy-to-use. Its user interface is clean and intuitive, and does not include any confusing or useless options. Thunar is fast and responsive with a good start up time and directory load time. NOTE: Thunar will be the file manager in the next Xfce release, but it should compile and work with the existing stable version as well. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 10 03:50:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Sep 2006 23:50:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192600] Review Request: sflowtool - Command line utility for analyzing sFlow data In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609100350.k8A3oDlo020735@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sflowtool - Command line utility for analyzing sFlow data https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192600 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords|Reopened | OtherBugsDependingO|163776 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 10 04:50:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2006 00:50:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193898] Review Request: Jython - Java source interpreter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609100450.k8A4oIX4022208@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Jython - Java source interpreter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193898 ------- Additional Comments From green at redhat.com 2006-09-10 00:50 EST ------- (In reply to comment #9) > There are currently 3 issues remaining with the package (that I know of) > 1. License (comment #8): > W: jython invalid-license Modified CNRI Open Source License I think we can ignore this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 10 04:53:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2006 00:53:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200941] Review Request: SooperLooper, a realtime software looping sampler (&Jack client) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609100453.k8A4r8WS022270@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: SooperLooper, a realtime software looping sampler (&Jack client) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200941 ------- Additional Comments From green at redhat.com 2006-09-10 00:53 EST ------- (In reply to comment #17) > (In reply to comment #16) > > I think there are only a couple of minor issues. See the lines that start with > > 'X'. This assumes the tweaks in my uploaded spec file are accepted. > > > > X BuildRequires are almost proper. > > - Look at the changes I made in the spec file I attached in Comment #14 to > > handle FC releases > 5. > > Should this be "%{fedora}" >= 4 or just ommit it? I think current Fedora Extras > for 4 and 5 has wxGTK as the name of the package with the proper > obsoletes/provides for wxGTK2, right? Yes, I think that's right. > Is this the version being used by your > build system? Yes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 10 05:29:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2006 01:29:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205878] Review Request: arj - Archiver for .arj files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609100529.k8A5T6SU023201@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: arj - Archiver for .arj files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205878 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-09-10 01:29 EST ------- Thanks! Imported and build, closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 10 08:09:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2006 04:09:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205891] Review Request: rpl - Intelligent recursive search/replace utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609100809.k8A89oV7029101@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rpl - Intelligent recursive search/replace utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205891 dan at danny.cz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |dan at danny.cz OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From dan at danny.cz 2006-09-10 04:09 EST ------- Review: - no rpmlint output on any package - package name OK - spec file name OK, is in English and is legible - package meets the Packaging Guidelines - license OK (GPL) and is included - source matches upstream 7187b2c650e1522a82242c2c7f5e7123 rpl_1.5.3.tar.gz 7187b2c650e1522a82242c2c7f5e7123 rpl_1.5.3.tar.gz.1 - builds at least on i386 (FC4 and devel) - no BuildRequires needed - no localized files - has no shared lib - do not create any directory - no duplicates files, permissions are set properly, uses %defattr - has %clean section - consistent use of macros - contains code - no large docs, %doc is not required during runtime - no devel subpackage required, no pkgconfig file - no .la libtool archives - not a GUI application - it works APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 10 09:50:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2006 05:50:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189150] Review Request: mod_mono In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609100950.k8A9o765018706@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mod_mono https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189150 paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-09-10 05:50 EST ------- Thanks - fixed and imported :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 10 10:10:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2006 06:10:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201674] Review Request: codeblocks In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609101010.k8AAAIfb019758@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: codeblocks https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201674 ------- Additional Comments From dan at danny.cz 2006-09-10 06:10 EST ------- Updated SRPM URL: http://fedora.danny.cz/codeblocks-1.0-0.8.20060909svn2965.src.rpm Updated spec URL: http://fedora.danny.cz/codeblocks.spec - update to revision 2965 - use %%configure macro - properly install the desktop file - update the mime database after install and uninstall - do not own only %%{_libdir}/codeblock/plugins, but also %%{_libdir}/codeblock - added a script for retrieving and packing a revision from the SVN repo -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 10 10:42:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2006 06:42:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204605] Review Request: geda-gsymcheck - Symbol checker for electronics schematics editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609101042.k8AAgf1i021636@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: geda-gsymcheck - Symbol checker for electronics schematics editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204605 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-09-10 06:42 EST ------- Closing as CLOSED NEXTRELEASE. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 10 10:55:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2006 06:55:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196101] Review Request: mimedefang In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609101055.k8AAtkdY022437@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mimedefang https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196101 ------- Additional Comments From redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de 2006-09-10 06:55 EST ------- Jason, could you please add --with-milterlib=%{_libdir} to %configure for testing whether it resolves the problem and building of mimedefang works? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 10 10:57:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2006 06:57:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196591] Review Request: bitlbee In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609101057.k8AAvrpP022584@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bitlbee https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196591 ------- Additional Comments From redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de 2006-09-10 06:57 EST ------- Paul...ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 10 11:19:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2006 07:19:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205891] Review Request: rpl - Intelligent recursive search/replace utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609101119.k8ABJJbp023689@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rpl - Intelligent recursive search/replace utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205891 rpm at timj.co.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From rpm at timj.co.uk 2006-09-10 07:19 EST ------- Thanks for the feedback and comments, and for the review Dan. Imported into Extras and built for devel (FC-5 branch requested) Jason, your comments re:env made sense, so I removed the hack in favour of "Requires: python". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 10 13:19:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2006 09:19:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205929] New: Review Request: libfreebob - FreeBoB firewire audio driver library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205929 Summary: Review Request: libfreebob - FreeBoB firewire audio driver library Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: green at redhat.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/green/FE/devel/libfreebob.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/green/FE/devel/libfreebob-1.0-1.src.rpm Description: libfreebob implements a userland driver for BeBoB-based fireware audio devices. Once approved, jack-audio-connection-kit should BuildRequire this. I've also already submitted a patch for qjackctl. I've tested all this with a presonus firebox and it works. Note that this requires libavc1394 be upgraded to version 0.5.3. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 10 13:20:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2006 09:20:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205929] Review Request: libfreebob - FreeBoB firewire audio driver library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609101320.k8ADKKic027832@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libfreebob - FreeBoB firewire audio driver library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205929 green at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |202928 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 10 13:21:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2006 09:21:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205929] Review Request: libfreebob - FreeBoB firewire audio driver library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609101321.k8ADL2V1027860@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libfreebob - FreeBoB firewire audio driver library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205929 green at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn|202928 |205928 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 10 14:30:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2006 10:30:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 195365] Review Request: etcnet - /etc/net network configuration system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609101430.k8AEUm9J029638@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: etcnet - /etc/net network configuration system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195365 linux at pilot.org.ua changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |205932 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 10 14:52:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2006 10:52:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205030] Review Request: atomix - Little mind game where you have to build molecules out of atoms lying around In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609101452.k8AEqHwY030409@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: atomix - Little mind game where you have to build molecules out of atoms lying around https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205030 paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-09-10 10:52 EST ------- Guidance has pretty much not occured :-( I'll stick out my neck on this (as it's the same as other games I've checked which do the same as this) and say ACCEPTED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 10 15:00:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2006 11:00:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203662] Review Request: dx - Open source version of IBM's Visualization Data Explorer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609101500.k8AF0g5g030885@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dx - Open source version of IBM's Visualization Data Explorer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203662 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-09-10 11:00 EST ------- Have you updated the spec and srpms? If you have, please can you post the URL for them? If it's only the spec file which has altered, you only need to upload that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 10 15:12:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2006 11:12:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201149] Review Request: Flexible WebServer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609101512.k8AFCok1031211@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Flexible WebServer Alias: Cherokee https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201149 ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2006-09-10 11:12 EST ------- The spec file srpm seems to be different than that link. Oh well, I built cherokee-0.5.4-22.1.src.rpm and: - It does not build. Missing flex. - When it does build the configure summary shows it missing tls and openssl. I think those would be useful. To fix these add a BuildRequires: flex openssl-devel gnutls-devel pkgconfig - Your files section is missing a defattr line. - Package owns some standard already existing directories and should not, like /usr/share/doc /usr/share/man. This is a result of the * wildcard %{_datadir}/*. Explicitly list what's under %_datadir. - The cherokee package contains development files like headers and static files, pkgconfig file, aclocal macros, and unversioned .so files. Split these off into a devel subpackage. - Contains .la files. Remove these if possible. - Missing a %changelog section. Please create one and make a new entry and increase the version or release every time you make a spec change. Does it have an init script that could be dropped in /etc/init.d ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 10 15:13:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2006 11:13:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193059] Review Request: ibmasm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609101513.k8AFD0tC031229@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ibmasm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193059 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-09-10 11:12 EST ------- There should only be one release tag and (from what I've been told from other RH engineers) the dist tag is optional. I would want a dist tag. The tarball should be %{name}-%{version}.tar.bz2 (or similar). The %{release} should really be a number rather than a macro. Yes, it's a pain, but it solves both problems. %package devel Requires: %{name} = %{version} You need this to be %{version}-%{release} to keep things in line %install make _LIB=%{_libdir} ROOT=${RPM_BUILD_ROOT} install Will the package not let you use make DEST_DIR=%{buildroot} install? install ../ibmasm.init ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}%{_sysconfdir}/rc.d/init.d/ibmasm Please use -m for the permission (I have a feeling it's a blocker if you don't use it). You have in the %files devel %attr(644,root,root) %{_includedir}/ibmasm/*.h If you use install -m 0644 in the %install step, the %attr is not required. %{_sbindir}/ibmsphalt %{_sbindir}/ibmspup Can be globbed - %{_sbindir}/ibms* The package is happy in mock (from your srpm) Correct these and I'll do the full review - I can't see many more problems though. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 10 15:19:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2006 11:19:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205138] Review Request: libjingle - GoogleTalk implementation of Jingle In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609101519.k8AFJkg7031605@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libjingle - GoogleTalk implementation of Jingle https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205138 paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-09-10 11:19 EST ------- Review Good Consistent use of macros Software compiles happily in mock with no errors in rpmlint Installs fine Spec in US English and UTF-8 No permissions problems No dupes in the rpms Upstream tarball matches dist tarball md5 Includes documentation No .a or .la files in the rpms Minor - not a blocker, but it makes things easier on the eye %{_libdir}/pkgconfig/jinglebase-0.3.pc %{_libdir}/pkgconfig/jinglep2p-0.3.pc %{_libdir}/pkgconfig/jinglesession-0.3.pc %{_libdir}/pkgconfig/jinglexmllite-0.3.pc %{_libdir}/pkgconfig/jinglexmpp-0.3.pc Can be globbed - %{_libdir}/pkgconfig/jingle*.pc I'm unable to test the code with anything extensive, but a simple bit of C showed that it would link and do as it's told. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 10 15:23:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2006 11:23:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205073] Review Request: MudMagic Mud Client - Onlnie Text Game Client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609101523.k8AFNcRP031794@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: MudMagic Mud Client - Onlnie Text Game Client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205073 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-09-10 11:23 EST ------- The bug needs to be reassigned and someone else takes it on. If you send an email to the fedora-extras mailing list, point them at this bug number and say that most of the hard work has been done, I'm pretty sure someone will take it up. If someone does take it up, reassign the bug to them. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 10 15:24:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2006 11:24:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199029] Review Request: jokosher In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609101524.k8AFOgqs031856@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jokosher https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199029 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-09-10 11:24 EST ------- Anymore progress on this package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 10 15:33:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2006 11:33:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205300] Review Request: gtk-sharp - a set of mono bindings for gtk1.2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609101533.k8AFXtm5032273@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtk-sharp - a set of mono bindings for gtk1.2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205300 paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 10 15:45:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2006 11:45:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205300] Review Request: gtk-sharp - a set of mono bindings for gtk1.2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609101545.k8AFjkSr032667@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtk-sharp - a set of mono bindings for gtk1.2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205300 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-09-10 11:45 EST ------- #2, are you using FC5 or 6? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 10 16:24:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2006 12:24:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 195365] Review Request: etcnet - /etc/net network configuration system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609101624.k8AGOfH4001519@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: etcnet - /etc/net network configuration system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195365 ------- Additional Comments From linux at pilot.org.ua 2006-09-10 12:24 EST ------- A Makefile was added. Meaningful rpmlint errors were fixed. Some other enhancements were done (see ChangeLog). I expect this snapshot to have little difference from soon 0.8.4 release. SPEC: http://etcnet.org/files/Fedora.spec SRPM URL: http://etcnet.org/files/etcnet-0.8.4-0.test7.src.rpm The package requires initscripts split. I have updated my initscripts patch to the 8.39-1 version and set up a repository of initscripts+net-scripts+etcnet here: http://etcnet.org/repo/fc6/ Thank you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 10 16:40:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2006 12:40:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205300] Review Request: gtk-sharp - a set of mono bindings for gtk1.2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609101640.k8AGeFI6002147@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtk-sharp - a set of mono bindings for gtk1.2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205300 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-09-10 12:40 EST ------- mock under fc6/devel. Happy to provide any further information... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 10 17:13:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2006 13:13:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204421] Review Request: kdetv - KDE application for watching TV In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609101713.k8AHDZj1003192@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdetv - KDE application for watching TV https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204421 packages at amiga-hardware.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 10 17:13:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2006 13:13:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196591] Review Request: bitlbee In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609101713.k8AHDhoC003208@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bitlbee https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196591 ------- Additional Comments From paul at xtdnet.nl 2006-09-10 13:13 EST ------- Did you create a new package for me to try out with the fixes? Can you give me a url. Don't forget to increase the release number. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 10 17:28:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2006 13:28:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196591] Review Request: bitlbee In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609101728.k8AHS3Up003936@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bitlbee https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196591 ------- Additional Comments From redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de 2006-09-10 13:28 EST ------- Paul, you didn't answer my questions regarding ntsysv, perl calls and proxy stuff from comment #19. Until these things aren't clarified, I'll build no new package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 10 17:50:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2006 13:50:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197814] Review Request: autogen In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609101750.k8AHoTcM005002@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: autogen https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197814 ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2006-09-10 13:50 EST ------- Here we go: 1. package meets naming guidelines, but not packaging guidelines. What is %{_datadir}/autogen/libopts-27.4.2.tar.gz doing there? You may also shorten the -devel filelist by specifying %{_mandir}/man3/* instead of enumerating all manpages. 2. specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. 3. dist tag is present. 4. build root is correct. 5. license field matches the actual license. 6. license is open source-compatible (GPL). License text included in package. 7. CANNOT check if source files match upstream: $ spectool -g autogen.spec --19:12:18-- http://autogen.sourceforge.net/data/autogen-5.8.5.tar.gz => `./autogen-5.8.5.tar.gz' Resolving autogen.sourceforge.net... 66.35.250.209 Connecting to autogen.sourceforge.net|66.35.250.209|:80... connected. HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 404 Not Found 19:12:19 ERROR 404: Not Found. NOTE: on the download page, there is also a bzip2'd tarball, why not use that instead of .gz? 8. latest version is being packaged. 9. BuildRequires are proper. 10. I haven't checked if the package builds in mock yet. 11. rpmlint is silent. 12. final provides and requires are sane: libguileopts.so.0()(64bit) libopts.so.25()(64bit) autogen = 5.8.5-5 = /bin/sh /sbin/install-info /usr/sbin/alternatives autoconf ldconfig libc.so.6()(64bit) libcrypt.so.1()(64bit) libdl.so.2()(64bit) libguile-ltdl.so.1()(64bit) libguile.so.12()(64bit) libm.so.6()(64bit) libopts.so.25()(64bit) libxml2.so.2()(64bit) libz.so.1()(64bit) autogen-devel = 5.8.5-5 = /bin/sh autogen = 5.8.5-5 pkgconfig 13. shared libraries are present and ldconfig is called appropriately 14. package is not relocatable. 15. owns the directories it creates. 16. doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. 17. no duplicates in %files 18. file permissions are appropriate. 19. %clean is present. 20. %check is missing and there is a test suite! 21. code, not content. 22. documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. 23. %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. 24. headers are in -devel 25. pkgconfig files are in -devel and Requires: pkgconfig is present. 26. no libtool .la droppings. 27. not a GUI app. 28. not a web app. Summary: NEEDSWORK Points 1,7 and 20. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 10 18:03:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2006 14:03:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 182254] Review Request: SS5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609101803.k8AI3pF5005399@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: SS5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=182254 ------- Additional Comments From matteo.ricchetti at libero.it 2006-09-10 14:03 EST ------- Ok, close it as NEXTRELEASE. I'm trying to update the package as you told me. Last help: I wrote twice to logo mailer asking about exposing Fedora Logo on my website, but I didn't yet receive a response. Can you contact them for me please? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 10 18:29:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2006 14:29:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 174883] Review Request: distcc -- A free distributed C/C++ compiler system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609101829.k8AITAv4007143@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: distcc -- A free distributed C/C++ compiler system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174883 ------- Additional Comments From enrico.scholz at informatik.tu-chemnitz.de 2006-09-10 14:28 EST ------- The fedora-usermgmt-devel stuff is for/in the -devel branch. When package gets approved during the FC-5 lifetime, I will use the old style. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 10 18:33:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2006 14:33:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189662] Review Request: transconnect -- A function imposter to allow transparent connection over HTTPS proxies In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609101833.k8AIXl3w007504@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: transconnect -- A function imposter to allow transparent connection over HTTPS proxies https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189662 ------- Additional Comments From enrico.scholz at informatik.tu-chemnitz.de 2006-09-10 14:33 EST ------- arglll... I forgot this review completely :( > The only issue remaining is the release. mmh... you said >> * I like it >> * it is used in all my other packages >> * it does not violate the guidelines > If you insist. But I think that it really complicates things needlessly. which sounds like "I do not like it but go ahead when you really want" for me... And I really want... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 10 18:43:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2006 14:43:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197814] Review Request: autogen In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609101843.k8AIhmNR008341@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: autogen https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197814 ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2006-09-10 14:43 EST ------- 10. package builds in mock/i386 (fc5 fc6). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 10 18:44:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2006 14:44:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 175433] Review Request: tor - Anonymizing overlay network for TCP (The onion router) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609101844.k8AIiVuO008431@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tor - Anonymizing overlay network for TCP (The onion router) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175433 ------- Additional Comments From enrico.scholz at informatik.tu-chemnitz.de 2006-09-10 14:44 EST ------- > I guess I don't see the point in splitting what's certainly going to > be required out to a subpackage. ok; package was written when it seemed that 'initng' could replace 'initscripts' in near future. But current development and codebaes shows that they are still in the experimenting phase (e.g. they try crazy things like garbage collector in init). But: I do not see a reason why 'distcc' needs lvm2, udev or e2fsprogs (which would be the case when SysV initscript would be in the main package). So I will keep core functionality and initscripts in separate packages. Things are special for this package because it supports startup with SysV, inetd and ssh. > Is there any existing daemon that has its initscripts in a subpackage? ip-sentinel, dhcp-forwarder, milter-greylist -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 10 18:50:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2006 14:50:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 175433] Review Request: tor - Anonymizing overlay network for TCP (The onion router) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609101850.k8AIoWpW009040@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tor - Anonymizing overlay network for TCP (The onion router) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175433 ------- Additional Comments From enrico.scholz at informatik.tu-chemnitz.de 2006-09-10 14:50 EST ------- sorry, comments where made with the wrong package in mind... So, please remove the third paragraph -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 10 18:58:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2006 14:58:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205955] New: Review Request:
- Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205955 Summary: Review Request:
- Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fedora at soeterbroek.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.soeterbroek.com/linux/fedora/extras/gdal/gdal.spec SRPM URL: http://www.soeterbroek.com/linux/fedora/extras/gdal/gdal-1.3.2-1.src.rpm Description: GDAL is a translator library for raster geospatial data formats. As a library, it presents a single abstract data model to the calling application for all supported formats. The related OGR library (which lives within the GDAL source tree) provides a similar capability for simple features vector data. Some additional information: ============================ Picking up where a previous orphaned review request left of (see https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=168719 for history): * Sun Sep 10 2006 Joost Soeterbroek 1.3.2-1 - new upstream version 1.3.2 - excluded *.pyc and *.pyo files - removed patch2, fixed upstream in gdal 1.3.2 - removed ChangeLog, no longer present in from source - add $RPM_OPT_FLAGS to %configure - moved man1/pct2rgb.1.gz, man1/rgb2pct.1.gz to *-python -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 10 18:59:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2006 14:59:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205955] Review Request: gdal - A translator library for raster geospatial data formats In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609101859.k8AIxrwp009467@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gdal - A translator library for raster geospatial data formats https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205955 fedora at soeterbroek.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request:
- |raster geospatial data | |formats -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 10 19:00:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2006 15:00:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205073] Review Request: MudMagic Mud Client - Onlnie Text Game Client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609101900.k8AJ02mJ009492@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: MudMagic Mud Client - Onlnie Text Game Client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205073 kyndig at mudmagic.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |WORKSFORME -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 10 19:16:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2006 15:16:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 168719] Review Request: gdal In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609101916.k8AJGqhb010166@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gdal https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=168719 fedora at soeterbroek.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora at soeterbroek.com ------- Additional Comments From fedora at soeterbroek.com 2006-09-10 15:16 EST ------- New review request: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205955 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 10 19:23:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2006 15:23:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201000] Review Request: libFoundation - A free implementation of OpenStep's Foundation Kit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609101923.k8AJNMDX010453@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libFoundation - A free implementation of OpenStep's Foundation Kit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201000 ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2006-09-10 15:23 EST ------- Here we go: 1. package meets naming and packaging guidelines. 2. specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. 3. dist tag is present. 4. build root is sane, though not the recommended one 5. license field matches the actual license. 6. ??? license is open source-compatible. License text included in package. 7. source files match upstream: 7df921ab5705af28a75e62a3a8744cb6 libFoundation-1.1.3-r155.tar.gz 8. latest version is being packaged. 9. BuildRequires are proper. 10. package builds in mock ( ). 11. rpmlint warnings as expected. 12. final provides and requires are sane: libFoundation.so.1.1()(64bit) libFoundation = 1.1.3-8 = /sbin/ldconfig libFoundation.so.1.1()(64bit) libc.so.6()(64bit) libdl.so.2()(64bit) libm.so.6()(64bit) libobjc.so.1()(64bit) libFoundation-devel = 1.1.3-8 = gcc-objc gnustep-make libFoundation = 1.1.3-8 13. shared libraries are present and ldconfig is called as appropriate 14. package is not relocatable. 15. owns the directories it creates. 16. doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. 17. duplicates in %files: warning: File listed twice: /usr/include/Foundation warning: File listed twice: /usr/include/Foundation/Foundation.h ... warning: File listed twice: /usr/include/Foundation/UnixSignalHandler.h warning: File listed twice: /usr/include/Foundation/exceptions warning: File listed twice: /usr/include/Foundation/exceptions/EncodingFormatExceptions.h ... warning: File listed twice: /usr/include/Foundation/exceptions/StringExceptions.h warning: File listed twice: /usr/include/extensions warning: File listed twice: /usr/include/extensions/DefaultScannerHandler.h ... warning: File listed twice: /usr/include/extensions/support.h warning: File listed twice: /usr/include/lfmemory.h warning: File listed twice: /usr/include/real_exception_file.h 18. file permissions are appropriate. 19. %clean is present. 20. %check is not present nor necessary 21. no scriptlets present. 22. code, not content. 23. documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. 24. %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. 25. headers in devel 26. no pkgconfig files. 27. no libtool .la droppings. 28. not a GUI app. 29. not a web app. Please fix 17. Is the license OSI-approved? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 10 19:50:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2006 15:50:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199168] Review Request: CGAL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609101950.k8AJoA7B011316@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: CGAL Alias: CGAL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199168 ed at eh3.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From ed at eh3.com 2006-09-10 15:50 EST ------- Hi Laurent, there have been no negative comments so I'll APPROVE this package. Please fix the two small needswork items (comment #22) before submitting the first build and please consider adding the CGALQt patch in comment #21. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 10 19:54:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2006 15:54:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189662] Review Request: transconnect -- A function imposter to allow transparent connection over HTTPS proxies In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609101954.k8AJstfD011488@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: transconnect -- A function imposter to allow transparent connection over HTTPS proxies https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189662 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-09-10 15:54 EST ------- (In reply to comment #8) > which sounds like "I do not like it but go ahead when you really want" for me... That's the right interpretation ;-) However for the release this is currently "I do not like it and for me it is a blocker". But I haven't assigned the bug to me such that somebody else can accept what you propose... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 10 19:59:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2006 15:59:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 181035] Review Request: luks-tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609101959.k8AJxaah011574@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: luks-tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=181035 ------- Additional Comments From Jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2006-09-10 15:59 EST ------- Bad: - rpmlint luks-tools complaints: $ rpmlint luks-tools-0.0.10-2.i386.rpm W: luks-tools non-executable-in-bin /usr/bin/gnome-luks-format.pyo 0644 W: luks-tools non-executable-in-bin /usr/bin/gnome-luks-format.pyc 0644 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 10 20:07:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2006 16:07:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205300] Review Request: gtk-sharp - a set of mono bindings for gtk1.2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609102007.k8AK70xK011766@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtk-sharp - a set of mono bindings for gtk1.2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205300 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-09-10 16:06 EST ------- Spec URL: http://www.knox.net.nz/~nodoid/gtk-sharp.spec SRPM URL: http://www.knox.net.nz/~nodoid/gtk-sharp-1.0.10-7.src.rpm Fixes galore! Now builds in mock -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 10 20:11:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2006 16:11:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197814] Review Request: autogen In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609102011.k8AKBU1i011930@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: autogen https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197814 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-09-10 16:11 EST ------- Spec URL: http://www.knox.net.nz/~nodoid/autogen.spec SRPM URL: http://www.knox.net.nz/~nodoid/autogen-5.8.5-6.src.rpm Lots of fixes. Lots of them... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 10 20:15:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2006 16:15:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197814] Review Request: autogen In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609102015.k8AKFLgI012062@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: autogen https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197814 rpm at greysector.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2006-09-10 16:15 EST ------- 1. package meets naming guidelines and packaging guidelines 7. source matches upstream 23d32772a119dbff4f3ce51a6331e06d autogen-5.8.5.tar.bz2 20. %check is present: Executing(%check): /bin/sh -e /home/dominik/build/tmp/rpm-tmp.81014 + umask 022 + cd /home/dominik/build/BUILD + cd autogen-5.8.5 + make check Making check in compat make[1]: Entering directory `/home/dominik/build/BUILD/autogen-5.8.5/compat' make[1]: Nothing to be done for `check'. make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/dominik/build/BUILD/autogen-5.8.5/compat' Making check in snprintfv make[1]: Entering directory `/home/dominik/build/BUILD/autogen-5.8.5/snprintfv' make[1]: Nothing to be done for `check'. make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/dominik/build/BUILD/autogen-5.8.5/snprintfv' Making check in autoopts make[1]: Entering directory `/home/dominik/build/BUILD/autogen-5.8.5/autoopts' Making check in test make[2]: Entering directory `/home/dominik/build/BUILD/autogen-5.8.5/autoopts/test' make check-TESTS make[3]: Entering directory `/home/dominik/build/BUILD/autogen-5.8.5/autoopts/test' PASS: nested.test PASS: argument.test PASS: cond.test PASS: config.test PASS: enums.test PASS: equiv.test PASS: errors.test PASS: getopt.test PASS: guile.test PASS: handler.test PASS: immediate.test PASS: keyword.test PASS: library.test PASS: main.test PASS: nls.test PASS: rc.test PASS: shell.test PASS: stdopts.test PASS: usage.test PASS: vers.test =================== All 20 tests passed =================== make[3]: Leaving directory `/home/dominik/build/BUILD/autogen-5.8.5/autoopts/test' make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/dominik/build/BUILD/autogen-5.8.5/autoopts/test' make[2]: Entering directory `/home/dominik/build/BUILD/autogen-5.8.5/autoopts' make[2]: Nothing to be done for `check-am'. make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/dominik/build/BUILD/autogen-5.8.5/autoopts' make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/dominik/build/BUILD/autogen-5.8.5/autoopts' Making check in agen5 make[1]: Entering directory `/home/dominik/build/BUILD/autogen-5.8.5/agen5' Making check in test make[2]: Entering directory `/home/dominik/build/BUILD/autogen-5.8.5/agen5/test' make check-TESTS make[3]: Entering directory `/home/dominik/build/BUILD/autogen-5.8.5/agen5/test' + sed -e '/^srcdir=/s@".*"@"."@' -e '/^top_srcdir=/s@".*"@"../.."@' ../../autoopts/test/defs + cd . + chmod +x alist.test case.test daemon.test define.test defref.test directives.test dynref.test endmac.test error.test expr.test extract.test forfrom.test forin.test format.test for.test get.test gperf.test heredef.test html.test include.test in.test license.test line.test loop.test make.test match.test opts.test output.test pseudo.test reorder.test shell.test snarf.test stack.test stress.test string.test strtable.test suffix.test PASS: define.test PASS: directives.test PASS: error.test PASS: expr.test PASS: extract.test PASS: include.test PASS: opts.test PASS: output.test PASS: snarf.test PASS: suffix.test PASS: shell.test PASS: alist.test PASS: case.test PASS: defref.test PASS: dynref.test PASS: endmac.test PASS: for.test PASS: forfrom.test PASS: forin.test PASS: format.test PASS: get.test gperf functionality does not work without gperf PASS: gperf.test PASS: heredef.test PASS: html.test PASS: in.test PASS: license.test PASS: line.test PASS: loop.test PASS: make.test PASS: match.test PASS: pseudo.test PASS: reorder.test PASS: stack.test PASS: stress.test PASS: string.test PASS: strtable.test =================== All 36 tests passed =================== make[3]: Leaving directory `/home/dominik/build/BUILD/autogen-5.8.5/agen5/test' make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/dominik/build/BUILD/autogen-5.8.5/agen5/test' make[2]: Entering directory `/home/dominik/build/BUILD/autogen-5.8.5/agen5' + for t in '"$@"' + echo Re-building stamp-man Re-building stamp-man + case "$t" in + test -z /home/dominik/build/BUILD/autogen-5.8.5/agen5/autogen -o -z /home/dominik/build/BUILD/autogen-5.8.5/columns/columns + eopt='-L ../autoopts -Tagman1 -bautogen' + echo /home/dominik/build/BUILD/autogen-5.8.5/agen5/autogen -L ../autoopts -Tagman1 -bautogen ./opts.def /home/dominik/build/BUILD/autogen-5.8.5/agen5/autogen -L ../autoopts -Tagman1 -bautogen ./opts.def + /home/dominik/build/BUILD/autogen-5.8.5/agen5/autogen -L ../autoopts -Tagman1 -bautogen ./opts.def + '[' '!' -z '' ']' make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/dominik/build/BUILD/autogen-5.8.5/agen5' make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/dominik/build/BUILD/autogen-5.8.5/agen5' Making check in columns make[1]: Entering directory `/home/dominik/build/BUILD/autogen-5.8.5/columns' make check-am make[2]: Entering directory `/home/dominik/build/BUILD/autogen-5.8.5/columns' make[2]: Nothing to be done for `check-am'. make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/dominik/build/BUILD/autogen-5.8.5/columns' make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/dominik/build/BUILD/autogen-5.8.5/columns' Making check in getdefs make[1]: Entering directory `/home/dominik/build/BUILD/autogen-5.8.5/getdefs' make check-recursive make[2]: Entering directory `/home/dominik/build/BUILD/autogen-5.8.5/getdefs' Making check in test make[3]: Entering directory `/home/dominik/build/BUILD/autogen-5.8.5/getdefs/test' make check-TESTS make[4]: Entering directory `/home/dominik/build/BUILD/autogen-5.8.5/getdefs/test' cd . ; chmod +x *.test PASS: cfg.test PASS: index.test PASS: option.test PASS: subblock.test ================== All 4 tests passed ================== make[4]: Leaving directory `/home/dominik/build/BUILD/autogen-5.8.5/getdefs/test' cd . ; chmod +x *.test make[3]: Leaving directory `/home/dominik/build/BUILD/autogen-5.8.5/getdefs/test' make[3]: Entering directory `/home/dominik/build/BUILD/autogen-5.8.5/getdefs' make[3]: Nothing to be done for `check-am'. make[3]: Leaving directory `/home/dominik/build/BUILD/autogen-5.8.5/getdefs' make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/dominik/build/BUILD/autogen-5.8.5/getdefs' make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/dominik/build/BUILD/autogen-5.8.5/getdefs' Making check in xml2ag make[1]: Entering directory `/home/dominik/build/BUILD/autogen-5.8.5/xml2ag' make check-recursive make[2]: Entering directory `/home/dominik/build/BUILD/autogen-5.8.5/xml2ag' Making check in test make[3]: Entering directory `/home/dominik/build/BUILD/autogen-5.8.5/xml2ag/test' make check-TESTS make[4]: Entering directory `/home/dominik/build/BUILD/autogen-5.8.5/xml2ag/test' cd . ; chmod +x *.test PASS: convert.test ================== All 1 tests passed ================== make[4]: Leaving directory `/home/dominik/build/BUILD/autogen-5.8.5/xml2ag/test' cd . ; chmod +x *.test make[3]: Leaving directory `/home/dominik/build/BUILD/autogen-5.8.5/xml2ag/test' make[3]: Entering directory `/home/dominik/build/BUILD/autogen-5.8.5/xml2ag' make[3]: Nothing to be done for `check-am'. make[3]: Leaving directory `/home/dominik/build/BUILD/autogen-5.8.5/xml2ag' make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/dominik/build/BUILD/autogen-5.8.5/xml2ag' make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/dominik/build/BUILD/autogen-5.8.5/xml2ag' Making check in doc make[1]: Entering directory `/home/dominik/build/BUILD/autogen-5.8.5/doc' make[1]: Nothing to be done for `check'. make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/dominik/build/BUILD/autogen-5.8.5/doc' Making check in pkg make[1]: Entering directory `/home/dominik/build/BUILD/autogen-5.8.5/pkg' make[1]: Nothing to be done for `check'. make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/dominik/build/BUILD/autogen-5.8.5/pkg' make[1]: Entering directory `/home/dominik/build/BUILD/autogen-5.8.5' make[1]: Nothing to be done for `check-am'. make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/dominik/build/BUILD/autogen-5.8.5' + exit 0 APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 10 20:20:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2006 16:20:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197814] Review Request: autogen In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609102020.k8AKKWpN012187@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: autogen https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197814 paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 10 20:45:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2006 16:45:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197814] Review Request: autogen In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609102045.k8AKjrnf013068@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: autogen https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197814 ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2006-09-10 16:45 EST ------- % rpm -ivh autogen-5.8.5-6.x86_64.rpm Preparing... ########################################### [100%] file /usr/lib64/libopts.so.25 from install of autogen-5.8.5-6 conflicts with file from package libopts-27.1-6.fc5 Looks like I haven't checked thoroughly enough... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 10 21:16:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2006 17:16:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 181035] Review Request: luks-tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609102116.k8ALGtb1013812@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: luks-tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=181035 ------- Additional Comments From redhat at flyn.org 2006-09-10 17:16 EST ------- Okay, I was not familiar with brp-python-bytecompile. Spec Name or Url: http://www.flyn.org/SRPMS/luks-tools.spec SRPM Name or Url: http://www.flyn.org/SRPMS/luks-tools-0.0.11-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 10 21:32:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2006 17:32:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203789] Review Request: kshutdown - KShutDown is an advanced shut down utility for KDE. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609102132.k8ALWMXK014111@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kshutdown - KShutDown is an advanced shut down utility for KDE. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203789 cgoorah at yahoo.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 10 21:34:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2006 17:34:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205300] Review Request: gtk-sharp - a set of mono bindings for gtk1.2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609102134.k8ALYUh5014196@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtk-sharp - a set of mono bindings for gtk1.2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205300 andreas at bawue.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177512 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From andreas at bawue.net 2006-09-10 17:34 EST ------- Good. Looks much better now. Please trim down the description for the gapi subpackage though. It is a bit excessivly long. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 10 21:34:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2006 17:34:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177512] Review Request: mysql-connector-net In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609102134.k8ALYhxM014226@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mysql-connector-net https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177512 andreas at bawue.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn|205300 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 10 21:35:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2006 17:35:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205032] Review Request: perl-Test-AutoBuild - a framework for continuous, unatttended software builds In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609102135.k8ALZP6j014265@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-AutoBuild - a framework for continuous, unatttended software builds https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205032 ------- Additional Comments From berrange at redhat.com 2006-09-10 17:35 EST ------- Thanks for the review feedback. I have addressed the following issues: - Renamed the SPEC file to match SRPM name - Use macros for all path prefixes - Added buildrequires on Test::Pod and Test::Pod::Coverage - Added docs/ dir to documentation files - Use macros for all programs used in build/install where available - Fixed buildroot to comply with Fedora standards - Make use of fedora-usermgmt package for creating builder account - Ensure main package owns all directories it creates in /etc/ & perl lib dir - Fixed %pre script to create dir for account - Fixed permissions of SPEC file - Fixed patch which was not applied The reason I have a Requires on 'perl-SVK' instead of 'perl(SVK)' is because the SVK integration actually uses the 'svk' script. A requires on 'perl(SVK)' would only represent the 'SVK.pm' module, not the script, hence I have the dependancy on the package instead. Updated SPEC & SRPMs are available at the following new URLs: http://berrange.com/~dan/fedora-review/perl-Test-AutoBuild/perl-Test-AutoBuild.spec http://berrange.com/~dan/fedora-review/perl-Test-AutoBuild/perl-Test-AutoBuild-1.2.0-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 10 21:40:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2006 17:40:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205300] Review Request: gtk-sharp - a set of mono bindings for gtk1.2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609102140.k8ALe15f014457@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtk-sharp - a set of mono bindings for gtk1.2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205300 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-09-10 17:39 EST ------- Spec URL: http://www.knox.net.nz/~nodoid/gtk-sharp.spec Shortened the gapi subpackage description -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 10 22:16:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2006 18:16:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205138] Review Request: libjingle - GoogleTalk implementation of Jingle In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609102216.k8AMGYfI016077@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libjingle - GoogleTalk implementation of Jingle https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205138 bdpepple at ameritech.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 10 22:31:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2006 18:31:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199029] Review Request: jokosher In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609102231.k8AMVPXP016426@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jokosher https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199029 ------- Additional Comments From snecklifter at gmail.com 2006-09-10 18:31 EST ------- (In reply to comment #30) > Anymore progress on this package? Yes! It is now ready for further review at www.iammetal.co.uk/jokosher Regards Chris -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 10 22:57:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2006 18:57:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205962] New: Review Request: - Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205962 Summary: Review Request: - Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mikestrong at yahoo.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: SRPM URL: Description: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 10 23:00:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2006 19:00:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205962] Review Request: - In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609102300.k8AN0i0B017232@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205962 mikestrong at yahoo.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: - - |build of scribus for ppc> Platform|All |powerpc -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 10 23:05:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2006 19:05:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205962] Review Request: - In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609102305.k8AN5D4X017364@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205962 peter at thecodergeek.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|Package Review |scribus AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |andreas.bierfert at lowlatency. | |de QAContact|fedora-package- |extras-qa at fedoraproject.org |review at redhat.com | CC| |peter at thecodergeek.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From peter at thecodergeek.com 2006-09-10 19:05 EST ------- Mike: Scribus is already in Extras (as you mentioned), so this seems to me nothing more than a request for the package in Extras to be updated to this new version. I'm changing the bug metadata to reflect that. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 11 05:00:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2006 01:00:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189195] Review Request: horde - php application framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609110500.k8B50rmG029686@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: horde - php application framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189195 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at theholbrooks.org 2006-09-11 01:00 EST ------- Spec URL: http://theholbrooks.org/RPMS/horde.spec SRPM URL: http://theholbrooks.org/RPMS/horde-3.1.3-3.src.rpm Bumped to 3.1.3, updated Requires:, properly tag %doc files. rpmlint is not kind to my noarch.rpm. IMO, all of them relating to /etc/horde can be ignored, including non-standard-[gu]id and non-standard file/dir permissions. The *.dist files are %config, but also IMO replacable as new config directives may trickle down from upstream and can then be compared against the REAL *.php config files. The rest seems like leftover cruft from the way the files were packaged upstream. It it our responsibility to run some obligatory chmod()s before the files get packaged? I set the final permissions for all relevant files during %install... Thanks for the comments Chris, cryptic as they may be. By 'updating with the Requires', I assume you meant 'rename php-pear-Mail_Mime to php-pear-Mail-Mime', which I've done. Sadly I'm not sure what you could mean by 'obviously does not handle locales properly'... this is my first encounter with locale-aware software, and I haven't found any documentation for %find_lang that I can use. Can you be more specific with what this package needs to do differently to avoid 'obviously not handle locales properly', or at least the name of a package that handles locales in a fashion similar to what horde needs? From my Comment #2 that was never answered: >> >> * the 'locale/*/horde.mo' files should be annotated with the corresponding >> %lang() tags; it would be probably the best to move them to the >> %regular /usr/share/locale and run '%find_lang horde' > >I've done the first part, labeled all the locales with the %lang() macro, but >I'm not sure if %find_lang applied in this situation. All the horde locales >are specified as ar_SY, bg_BG, en_US, etc... but most of the locales in >/usr/share/locale is just the 2-letter ar, bg, en, etc. Is find_lang smart >enough to overcome this, should I run some logic to figure it out myself, or >should they be copied in as-is? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 11 05:46:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2006 01:46:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192912] Review Request: paps In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609110546.k8B5kRGn031358@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: paps https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192912 ------- Additional Comments From dov.grobgeld at gmail.com 2006-09-11 01:46 EST ------- I have now ported paps to use the cairo-ps backend instead of libpaps. Unfortunately it triggered a ghostscript bug. See: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8180 Regarding the rest of the changes described in this discussion, please make sure that they are applied to the paps cvs, or filed as bugs/enhancements in the paps sourceforge page. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 11 06:15:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2006 02:15:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189195] Review Request: horde - php application framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609110615.k8B6Fgnc032442@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: horde - php application framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189195 ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2006-09-11 02:15 EST ------- I'm not sure of the answer to your question, but you can always give it a try and see. But not using %find_lang is a blocker. Having a million different %lang doesnt look right, all spec files ive seen just use %find_lang. For more information see, http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-8c605ebf8330f6d505f384e671986fa99a8f72ee The requires look better now, except I'm not sure about Requires: php_database -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 11 06:41:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2006 02:41:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205955] Review Request: gdal - A translator library for raster geospatial data formats In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609110641.k8B6fWwn000820@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gdal - A translator library for raster geospatial data formats https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205955 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 11 08:04:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2006 04:04:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205955] Review Request: gdal - A translator library for raster geospatial data formats In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609110804.k8B84CK9006160@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gdal - A translator library for raster geospatial data formats https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205955 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-09-11 04:03 EST ------- Okay. I will review this package. First review: 1. From http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines : * License: - Well, how can I know that this package can be distributed under MIT? It seems that main package does not include any licence document. * rpmlint: - is not silent. W: gdal macro-in-%changelog configure W: gdal macro-in-%changelog configure W: gdal mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs - Use %% in changelog so as the description in changelog is not expanded. - if it is difficult finding where tabs are used, use "sed -i -e 's|\t| |g' gdal.spec", which automatically changes tabs in spec file into two spaces. * Tags: - use %?dist tag * Requires: - -python package requires python-numeric as gdal_merge.py includes the line: "import Numeric" (this dependency cannot be automatically checked). * BuildRequires: - libjpeg-devel, zlib-devel, netcdf-devel <- required by hdf-devel (ditto requires for -devel package) * Encoding - Several text files are encoded in ISO-8859. Change the encoding to UTF-8 unless it is necessary. - ./gdal-1.3.2-1/usr/share/gdal/seed_2d.dgn: Microstation ./gdal-1.3.2-1/usr/share/gdal/seed_3d.dgn: data Well, what are these files? * Why the %makeinstall macro should not be used - Don't use %makeinstall * Timestamps - These (gdal) package contains lots of text files, so keeping timestamps is preferable. Keep timestamps of those files (usually 'make install' accepts the option 'INSTALL="install -c -p"'. * File and Directory Ownership - Don't own the directory %python_sitearch itself. 2. From http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines * MUST: The sources used to build the package must match.... - Specify the URL of the source. I cannot verify is the source is correct. * MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, - /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/_gdalmodule.la - should be removed. * SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package functions as described - I have not yet checked if these packages functionally work well as desired. Please give me some simple examples if you can. 3. Other things I have noticed: * Packaging issue: - in %prep stage: - %patch0 -p0: it is preferable that the suffix for original files is specified. - cd %{_builddir}/%{name}-%{version} is not necessary. The working directory at this stage is it. - in file entry: - Don't use %exclude unless there is no way to avoid using %exclude (such as %exclude %{_bindir}/*.pyc) as it makes file entry somewhat complicate. For example, specify %{_bindir}, %{_mandir}/man1/ entry so as not to use %exclude. Especially: - Explicitly REMOVE the files which are not included in any packages in %install stage (such as static archive) - I doubt that -devel package should have html directory. Owning files under html directory is sufficient. i.e: I suspect that %doc html should be %doc html/* -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 11 08:43:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2006 04:43:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205912] Review Request: Thunar - Thunar File Manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609110843.k8B8hQtc009035@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Thunar - Thunar File Manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205912 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-09-11 04:43 EST ------- Some BR missing: freetype-devel libxslt or %{_bindir}/xsltproc this shouldn't be used, but is safer (assorted with --enable-xml2po): gnome-doc-utils or %{_bindir}/xml2po A BuildRequires: pkgconfig could also be there, although it should be allready needed by some devel dependencies. The trash panel applet isn't built on devel, I think it is because there is no libxfce4panel-1.0.pc providing version 4.3.90, but instead xfce4-panel-1.0.pc with 4.2.x. This seems to be a dependency for the xfce beta repo? At the same time it seems that the latest exo isn't in the beta repo, so Thunar becomes a bit hard to test... In the mean time, maybe it is better not to build the tpa plugin, and enable it only when xfce4-panel is updated. There is also, for -devel, a missing Requires: pkgconfig in files %{_sysconfdir}/xdg/Thunar should be %dir %{_sysconfdir}/xdg/Thunar It is not completly obvious whether Gconf is usefull or not. If it is not usefull anymore it should be removed from configure.ac and thunar-vfs/Makefile.am, other wise there should certainly be a BuildRequires. I think that it would be nice to have the gtk-doc documentation in -devel with --enable-gtk-doc and BuildRequires: gtk-doc As a side note, maybe you could consider packaging xfce4-dev-tools from xfce4 beta, even before xfce4 is out, since some autoconf macros used by Thunar are in this packages (and not in thunar). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 11 08:44:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2006 04:44:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193106] Review Request: gtkmozembedmm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609110844.k8B8i9Ip009103@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtkmozembedmm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193106 ------- Additional Comments From karlthered at gmail.com 2006-09-11 04:44 EST ------- * updated spec: http://darkenphoenix.free.fr/RPMS/RPMS/Extras/SPECS/gtkmozembedmm.spec * updated SRPM: http://darkenphoenix.free.fr/RPMS/RPMS/Extras/SRPMS/gtkmozembedmm-1.4.2.cvs20060817-3.fc5.src.rpm 0. License has been added (LGPL) 1. this is a mistake, the previous package didn't follow naming guidelines. Since the last tarball available is 2 years old and no more working, I'm using a cvs snapshot (17/08/2006 currently). I tested the sources, and I can compile and launch a minimal web browser using the bindings. 2. the autotools scripts requires mozilla-gtkmozembed.pc, so I added a conditional build requires on firefox-devel for FC6+ (plus a sed script to require firefox-gtkmozembed.pc) and mozilla-devel for older release. I didn't test the fc6 package but it builds fine under mock. 3. gtkmozembedmm has no web place except gnome cvs, but gtkmm mailing-lists provide some support. The binding is listed here: http://gtkmm.sourceforge.net/extra.shtml 4. done 5. done 6. the install-sh script is a symlink to /usr/share/automake-1.9/install-sh , I added automake-1.9 as BR, now the package builds in mock for fc5/f6 i386. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 11 09:02:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2006 05:02:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205343] Review Request: cohoba - Cohoba is a GNOME interface for Telepathy. It aims to be innovative and simple In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609110902.k8B92o8H010121@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cohoba - Cohoba is a GNOME interface for Telepathy. It aims to be innovative and simple https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205343 ------- Additional Comments From sander at hoentjen.eu 2006-09-11 05:02 EST ------- (In reply to comment #7) > Bad: > * There is an ownership problem with the '%{_libdir}/cohoba' directory. will fix > * I believe you still need a requires on pygtk2, since I don't see anything that > will pull in this requirement. will fix > * rpmlint produces the following error: > E: cohoba only-non-binary-in-usr-lib Hmm yes this is about /usr/lib64/cohoba/cohoba-applet I guess. Should that become /usr/libexec/cohoba-applet? > * The biggest issue was that I could never create an account to get it working > on FC5. The problem seemed to be due to account dialog's network spinner button > not being populated. I was only allowed to add my account & password, and not > the network. see below > > Minor: > * Group Tag should probably be Applications/Communications will fix (In reply to comment #8) > Ok, I found out what the problem was with the account not being able to work. > You missing a requires on telepathy-gabble. cohoba needs a connection manager, but not necessarily telepathy-gabble. IMHO it should be fixed upstream (show a message that a connection manager is needed if none are found). I know you package gossip, and it will have the same requirement (*a* connection manager) but for gossip it might make sense to require telepathy-gabble since that would make upgrading less painful. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 11 10:36:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2006 06:36:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205265] Review Request: libxml- Old libXML library for Gnome-1 application compatibility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609111036.k8BAaVMY015348@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libxml- Old libXML library for Gnome-1 application compatibility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205265 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-09-11 06:36 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > Issues: > > 1. If the license is LGPL (as it appears to be), no need to include the > COPYING file as that is the GPL. doc/xml.html says: This library is released both under the W3C Copyright and the GNU LGPL. The only GPL bits appear to be the buildsystem (e.g. libtool), so I've dropped the COPYING file. > 2. The devel package has: > Requires: %{name} = %{epoch}:%{version} > That should probibly be: > Requires: %{name} = %{epoch}:%{version}-%{release} Done. > 3. rpmlint says: > E: libxml-devel only-non-binary-in-usr-lib > W: libxml-devel no-documentation > > I think those can both be ignored in this case. I agree. Next version: Spec URL: http://www.city-fan.org/~paul/extras/Gnome-1/libxml.spec SRPM URL: http://www.city-fan.org/~paul/extras/Gnome-1/libxml-1.8.17-15.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 11 12:06:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2006 08:06:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204954] Review Request: libofa - Open Fingerprint Architecture library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609111206.k8BC6b90021313@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libofa - Open Fingerprint Architecture library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204954 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-09-11 08:06 EST ------- Perhaps debian's patch for lib/JAMA/tnt_math_utils.h works ( I have not yet checked debian's patch) http://ftp.debian.org/debian/pool/main/libo/libofa/libofa_0.9.3-1.diff.gz -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 11 13:47:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2006 09:47:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199168] Review Request: CGAL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609111347.k8BDltYo027475@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: CGAL Alias: CGAL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199168 laurent.rineau__fedora_extras at normalesup.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From laurent.rineau__fedora_extras at normalesup.org 2006-09-11 09:47 EST ------- Thanks you, Ed! I have successfully build CGAL-3_2_1-17_fc6 (job 1699 of the build system). Here are the changes: ========================================== * Mon Sep 11 2006 Laurent Rineau - 3.2.1-17 - libCGALQt.so needs -lGL - remove %{_bindir}/cgal_make_macosx_app * Sat Sep 11 2006 Laurent Rineau - 3.2.1-16 - Remove CORE support. Its acceptance in Fedora is controversial (bug #199168). - Exclude .vcproj files from the -demos-source subpackage. - Added a patch to build *shared* library libCGALQt. - Added a patch to avoid building static libraries. - Fixed the License: tag. ========================================== The patch for libCGALQt.so is mine. As the upstream maintainer of CGAL::Qt_widget, I will try to find a better solution before the release of CGAL-3.3. CORE and Taucs supports will be considered lately. As a consequence of the absence of CORE, at least the kernel CGAL::Exact_predicates_exact_constructions_kernel_with_sqrt will not be available. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 11 13:48:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2006 09:48:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205343] Review Request: cohoba - Cohoba is a GNOME interface for Telepathy. It aims to be innovative and simple In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609111348.k8BDmd3o027528@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cohoba - Cohoba is a GNOME interface for Telepathy. It aims to be innovative and simple https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205343 ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at ameritech.net 2006-09-11 09:48 EST ------- (In reply to comment #9) > cohoba needs a connection manager, but not necessarily telepathy-gabble. IMHO it > should be fixed upstream (show a message that a connection manager is needed if > none are found). > I know you package gossip, and it will have the same requirement (*a* connection > manager) but for gossip it might make sense to require telepathy-gabble since > that would make upgrading less painful. That's fine, but before this package can be accepted, you should make a patch then to show a message to the user. As is, it's almost unusable for the user who isn't familar with the telepathy framework. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 11 13:53:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2006 09:53:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192311] Review Request: cobbler In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609111353.k8BDrau1027979@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cobbler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192311 ------- Additional Comments From mdehaan at redhat.com 2006-09-11 09:53 EST ------- John (et al), Thanks! Would you mind sponsoring me on this? I'm currently lacking sponsorship and can't submit otherwise. The CLA is in the mail. Michael -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 11 14:00:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2006 10:00:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204954] Review Request: libofa - Open Fingerprint Architecture library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609111400.k8BE0NwU028336@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libofa - Open Fingerprint Architecture library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204954 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-09-11 10:00 EST ------- Thanks, hidden within all the debian-isms in in there, is what appears to be a gcc41 patch. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 11 14:20:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2006 10:20:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203520] Review Request: evolution-brutus In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609111420.k8BEKPWx029406@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: evolution-brutus Alias: evolution-brutus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203520 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-09-11 10:20 EST ------- -------------------------------------------------- I cannot sponsor you because I am not a member of sponsors. I can do only pre-review of this package. -------------------------------------------------- 1. From http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines : * Timestamps - These packages include many text files and preserving timestamps is then preferable. Try to keep timestamps (can this package accept 'make INSTALL="install -c -p" install'?) * File and Directory Ownership - The following directories are not owned by any packages. /usr/include/evolution-data-server-1.8/brutus/ /usr/share/idl/brutus/ 2. From http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines : = Nothing. 3. Other things I have noticed : - Well, %{find_lang} %{name}-2.8 perhaps means: Conflicts: evolution < 2.7 Conflicts: evolution >= 2.9 mock build for FE-6 devel i386 is okay. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 11 14:43:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2006 10:43:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205620] Fedora Extras: Package Review Request: buildos In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609111443.k8BEhKUh031533@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Fedora Extras: Package Review Request: buildos https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205620 ------- Additional Comments From prarit at redhat.com 2006-09-11 10:43 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=135995) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=135995&action=view) source rpm Added new source rpm that fixes the issue dchapman raised. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 11 14:44:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2006 10:44:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205620] Fedora Extras: Package Review Request: buildos In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609111444.k8BEiDaP031604@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Fedora Extras: Package Review Request: buildos https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205620 prarit at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #135789|0 |1 is obsolete| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 11 15:09:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2006 11:09:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205886] Review Request: perl-File-MMagic-XS - Guess file type with XS In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609111509.k8BF90ij001182@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-File-MMagic-XS - Guess file type with XS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205886 ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2006-09-11 11:08 EST ------- Fixed the rpmlint warning and error. As to the license, I've emailed the upstream author for clarification, but I suspect that the few files missing license attribution are indeed Apache, due to the fact that this code is just a port to perl of existing Apache licensed code. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 11 15:09:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2006 11:09:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205886] Review Request: perl-File-MMagic-XS - Guess file type with XS In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609111509.k8BF9o3l001229@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-File-MMagic-XS - Guess file type with XS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205886 ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2006-09-11 11:09 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=136002) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=136002&action=view) Fixed spec file -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 11 15:11:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2006 11:11:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205884] Review Request: perl-Email-Valid - Check validity of internet email address In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609111511.k8BFBGTg001305@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Email-Valid - Check validity of internet email address https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205884 ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2006-09-11 11:11 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=136003) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=136003&action=view) Fixed spec file -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 11 15:17:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2006 11:17:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205887] Review Request: perl-HTTP-Body - HTTP Body Parser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609111517.k8BFHsbc001790@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-HTTP-Body - HTTP Body Parser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205887 ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2006-09-11 11:17 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=136007) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=136007&action=view) Fixed spec file This spec file has the missing BR, removes the unnecessary R, and adds a slightly more detailed description. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 11 15:20:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2006 11:20:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196591] Review Request: bitlbee In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609111520.k8BFK08L002071@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bitlbee https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196591 ------- Additional Comments From paul at xtdnet.nl 2006-09-11 11:19 EST ------- chkconfig --add bitlbee will just make sure the service is "registered" with the management system that programs such as ntsysv use to enable/disable services. >From the man page: --add name This option adds a new service for management by chkconfig. When a new service is added, chkconfig ensures that the service has either a start or a kill entry in every runlevel. If any runlevel is missing such an entry, chkconfig creates the appro- priate entry as specified by the default values in the init script. Note that default entries in LSB-delimited ?INIT INFO? sections take precedence over the default runlevels in the initscript. install -m ... vs %makeinstall and perl. I personally like the install -m lines over perl replacements of Makefiles. But whatever you decide is fine. I still need to do more testing with the proxy stuff. I wouldn't stall the package on that though. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 11 15:54:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2006 11:54:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196101] Review Request: mimedefang In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609111554.k8BFsvY4005118@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mimedefang https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196101 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-09-11 11:54 EST ------- Yes, that does indeed fix the problem. I'm seeing a couple of additional rpmlint issues that I don't see in the discussion above: W: mimedefang mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs Your indentation is a bit odd (both tabs and spaces) but I think this warning is bogus anyway. E: mimedefang-debuginfo empty-debuginfo-package Indeed, there is nothing at all in the debuginfo package. I think the executables are being stripped: test "" != "1" && strip md-mx-ctrl test "" != "1" && strip mimedefang test "" != "1" && strip mimedefang-multiplexor The Makefile seems to use DONT_STRIP for this. I changed the make line to: make %{?_smp_mflags} DONT_STRIP=1 and things are better. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 11 16:08:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2006 12:08:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204954] Review Request: libofa - Open Fingerprint Architecture library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609111608.k8BG8Ewh006500@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libofa - Open Fingerprint Architecture library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204954 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-09-11 12:08 EST ------- Turns out the patch doesn't seem to help any, build dies similarly as before: ... g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I../include -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m32 -march=i386 -mtune=generic -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -Wall -g -MT mainprint.lo -MD -MP -MF .deps/mainprint.Tpo -c mainprint.cpp -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/mainprint.o JAMA/tnt_math_utils.h: In function 'Real TNT::hypot(const Real&, const Real&) [with Real = float]': JAMA/jama_svd.h:73: instantiated from 'JAMA::SVD::SVD(const TNT::Array2D&) [with Real = float]' mainprint.cpp:151: instantiated from here JAMA/tnt_math_utils.h:33: error: call of overloaded 'abs(const float&)' is ambiguous /usr/include/stdlib.h:786: note: candidates are: int abs(int) /usr/lib/gcc/i386-redhat-linux/4.1.1/../../../../include/c++/4.1.1/cstdlib:172: note: long long int __gnu_cxx::abs(long long int) /usr/lib/gcc/i386-redhat-linux/4.1.1/../../../../include/c++/4.1.1/cstdlib:142: note: long int std::abs(long int) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 11 16:12:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2006 12:12:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204343] Review Request: qcomicbook - a comic book viewing program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609111612.k8BGCmdF006838@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qcomicbook - a comic book viewing program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204343 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-09-11 12:12 EST ------- Hello, John. Did you accept to sponsor Scott? This is in fact NEEDSPONSOR issue. See bug 199780. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 11 16:18:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2006 12:18:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204954] Review Request: libofa - Open Fingerprint Architecture library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609111618.k8BGIba9007242@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libofa - Open Fingerprint Architecture library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204954 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-09-11 12:18 EST ------- build failure reported upstream: http://forums.predixis.com/index.php?showtopic=2196 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 11 16:40:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2006 12:40:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204954] Review Request: libofa - Open Fingerprint Architecture library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609111640.k8BGeR52009126@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libofa - Open Fingerprint Architecture library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204954 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-09-11 12:40 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=136017) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=136017&action=view) Mock build log of libofa with debian gcc patch applied Umm? For me (gcc-4.1.1-20.i386), mock build succeeded. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 11 16:43:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2006 12:43:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204954] Review Request: libofa - Open Fingerprint Architecture library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609111643.k8BGhdqd009360@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libofa - Open Fingerprint Architecture library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204954 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-09-11 12:43 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=136018) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=136018&action=view) diff of libofa.spec Diff between original 0.9.3-1 spec file and the one I used. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 11 17:07:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2006 13:07:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206037] New: Review Request: php-pear-Console-Table - Class that makes it easy to build console style tables Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206037 Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Console-Table - Class that makes it easy to build console style tables Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: Fedora at FamilleCollet.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://remi.collet.free.fr/rpms/extras/php-pear-Console-Table.spec SRPM URL: http://remi.collet.free.fr/rpms/extras/php-pear-Console-Table-1.0.5-1.fc5.src.rpm Description: A pear extension for php : Provides methods such as addRow(), insertRow(), addCol() etc. to build console tables with or without headers. This is a requirement for php-pear-PHP-CompatInfo rpmlint : W: php-pear-Console-Table no-documentation => no document upstream and no copy found for BSD licence. W: php-pear-Console-Table dangerous-command-in-%post install => rpmlint bug Build in mock : http://remi.collet.free.fr/rpms/extras/php-pear-Console-Table-build.log Running : "pear run-tests -p Console_Table" Running 7 tests ... 7 PASSED TESTS 0 SKIPPED TESTS Note : i'm searching for a solution to include the "run-tests" in the %check, but i don't find a solution (extension must be installed). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 11 17:20:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2006 13:20:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198613] Review Request: compat-libgda - gnome database access library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609111720.k8BHKtQq011268@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compat-libgda - gnome database access library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198613 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |tcallawa at redhat.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2006-09-11 13:20 EST ------- OK, I went to review this one, and found a few really minor issues that I fixed. If you're ok with the minor changes, this package is approved. Specifically, I added an xbase conditional (since xbase is in FE), enabled everything that could be built by default in Fedora, and fixed the libraries so that they get handled properly by debuginfo. Also, I changed Source0 so it points to a URL. Last, I fixed the License tags for the provider packages so that they were GPL (only the core libgda libs are LGPL) and included the LGPL text in the main package as a %doc. REVIEW ======= - rpmlint checks return: W: compat-libgda-devel no-documentation W: compat-gda-mysql no-documentation W: compat-gda-odbc no-documentation W: compat-gda-postgres no-documentation W: compat-gda-sqlite no-documentation W: compat-gda-ldap no-documentation W: compat-gda-xbase no-documentation All ok. - package meets naming guidelines - package meets packaging guidelines - license (LGPL) OK, text in %doc, matches source - spec file legible, in am. english - source matches upstream - package compiles on devel (x86) - no missing BR - no unnecessary BR - locales grabbed with find_lang - not relocatable - owns all directories that it creates - no duplicate files - permissions ok - %clean ok - macro use consistent - code, not content - no need for -docs - nothing in %doc affects runtime - no need for .desktop file - devel package ok - no .la files - post/postun ldconfig ok - devel requires base package n-v-r APPROVED (assuming you use my spec) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 11 17:22:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2006 13:22:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198613] Review Request: compat-libgda - gnome database access library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609111722.k8BHMBGe011345@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compat-libgda - gnome database access library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198613 ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2006-09-11 13:22 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=136022) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=136022&action=view) Updated compat-libgda spec file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 11 17:23:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2006 13:23:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198613] Review Request: compat-libgda - gnome database access library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609111723.k8BHN9IM011436@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compat-libgda - gnome database access library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198613 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 11 17:41:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2006 13:41:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205265] Review Request: libxml- Old libXML library for Gnome-1 application compatibility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609111741.k8BHfnJ7013147@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libxml- Old libXML library for Gnome-1 application compatibility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205265 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-09-11 13:41 EST ------- Excellent. All issues I see are fixed now, so this package is APPROVED. Don't forget to close this bug with NEXTRELEASE once the package has been imported and built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 11 17:47:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2006 13:47:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206037] Review Request: php-pear-Console-Table - Class that makes it easy to build console style tables In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609111747.k8BHlMIb013554@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Console-Table - Class that makes it easy to build console style tables Alias: pear-Console-Table https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206037 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |chris.stone at gmail.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | Alias| |pear-Console-Table -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 11 17:49:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2006 13:49:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198613] Review Request: compat-libgda - gnome database access library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609111749.k8BHnioV013682@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compat-libgda - gnome database access library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198613 ------- Additional Comments From denis at poolshark.org 2006-09-11 13:49 EST ------- Thanks Tom, I'll use your spec file. Of course now that this package is approved, I'm willing to bet Gnome will release libgda 2.0 tomorrow :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 11 17:54:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2006 13:54:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205300] Review Request: gtk-sharp - a set of mono bindings for gtk1.2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609111754.k8BHsMCs014004@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtk-sharp - a set of mono bindings for gtk1.2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205300 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 11 18:05:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2006 14:05:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206037] Review Request: php-pear-Console-Table - Class that makes it easy to build console style tables In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609111805.k8BI5EOH014648@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Console-Table - Class that makes it easy to build console style tables Alias: pear-Console-Table https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206037 ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2006-09-11 14:05 EST ------- - rpmlint output: W: php-pear-Console-Table no-documentation W: php-pear-Console-Table dangerous-command-in-%post install Both warnings are fine. - package is named according to Package Naming Guidelines - spec filename matches package %{name} - package meets Packaging Guidelines - package licensed with open source compatible license - license field in spec matches actual license - source does not include copy of license - spec file written in American english - spec file is l3g1bL3 - sources match upstream 23c6973122c1106673c6ccce7375c4e2 Console_table-1.0.5.tgz - package successfully compiles and builds on x86_64 FC5 - All build dependecncies are listed in BuildRequires - package does not use locales - package does not contain shared libraries - package is not relocatable - package owns all directories it creates - no duplicate files in %files - File permissions are set properly - package contains proper %clean section - macro usage is consistent - package contains permissible code - no large documentation files - %doc does not affect runtime - no header files or static libraries - no pkgconfig files - no .so files - no devel package - no .la files - package is not a GUI needing .desktop files X Package owns files or directories owned by other packages ==== MUST FIX ==== - Change: %{pear_phpdir}/Console To: %{pear_phpdir}/Console/Table.php The %{pear_phpdir}/Console directory is owned by php-pear. Packages that fall under these dirs should not own them. (NOTE: I think you need to fix XML_Parser for this issue as well, sorry I did not spot it earlier). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 11 18:19:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2006 14:19:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204343] Review Request: qcomicbook - a comic book viewing program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609111819.k8BIJ8pI015773@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qcomicbook - a comic book viewing program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204343 ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2006-09-11 14:18 EST ------- Yes I am sponsoring. Apply for cvsextras. I still highly recommend removing the commented out lines for readibility, however. Without syntax highlighting it is difficult to see what lines are evaluated and which are not. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 11 18:19:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2006 14:19:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196591] Review Request: bitlbee In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609111819.k8BIJuQh015834@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bitlbee https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196591 ------- Additional Comments From redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de 2006-09-11 14:19 EST ------- Hey...next time, please read the whole 'man chkconfig' and not only the part you're looking for: chkconfig provides a simple command-line tool for maintaining the /etc/rc[0-6].d directory hierarchy by relieving system administrators of the task of directly manipulating the numerous symbolic links in those directories. [...] chkconfig also can manage xinetd scripts via the means of xinetd.d configuration files. Note that only the on, off, and --list commands are supported for xinetd. d services. [...] And regarding reload vs. condrestart, there's no good reason to use condrestart over reload especially when looking to other xinetd files in Fedora Extra CVS: http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/*checkout*/devel/proftpd/proftpd.spec? root=extras http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/*checkout*/devel/uw-imap/uw-imap.spec? root=extras Nevertheless, ever sent a "killproc xinetd -HUP" when xinetd was not running? It absolutely doesn't matter and guessing that's the reason why uw-imap and proftpd just do it. I'll strictly follow the Fedora Extras "examples" staying there for years now, especially when there's no official or inofficial guideline. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 11 18:30:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2006 14:30:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206052] New: Review Request: php-pear-PHP-CompatInfo - Find out version and extensions required for a piece of code to ru n Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206052 Summary: Review Request: php-pear-PHP-CompatInfo - Find out version and extensions required for a piece of code to ru n Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: Fedora at FamilleCollet.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://remi.collet.free.fr/rpms/extras/php-pear-PHP-CompatInfo.spec SRPM URL: http://remi.collet.free.fr/rpms/extras/php-pear-PHP-CompatInfo-1.3.2-1.fc5.src.rpm Description: A PEAR extension for PHP : PHP_CompatInfo will parse a file/folder/script/array to find out the minimum version and extensions required for it to run. Features advanced debug output which shows which functions require which version and CLI output script rpmlint : W: php-pear-PHP-CompatInfo dangerous-command-in-%post install => rpmlint bug build in mock : http://remi.collet.free.fr/rpms/extras/php-pear-PHP-CompatInfo-build.log -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 11 18:32:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2006 14:32:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206052] Review Request: php-pear-PHP-CompatInfo - Find out version and extensions required for a piece of code to ru n In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609111832.k8BIW704017131@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-PHP-CompatInfo - Find out version and extensions required for a piece of code to ru n https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206052 Fedora at FamilleCollet.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |206037 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 11 18:32:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2006 14:32:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206037] Review Request: php-pear-Console-Table - Class that makes it easy to build console style tables In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609111832.k8BIW8q6017140@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Console-Table - Class that makes it easy to build console style tables Alias: pear-Console-Table https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206037 Fedora at FamilleCollet.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |206052 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 11 18:34:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2006 14:34:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206037] Review Request: php-pear-Console-Table - Class that makes it easy to build console style tables In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609111834.k8BIYDk0017364@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Console-Table - Class that makes it easy to build console style tables Alias: pear-Console-Table https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206037 ------- Additional Comments From Fedora at FamilleCollet.com 2006-09-11 14:34 EST ------- Spec: http://remi.collet.free.fr/rpms/extras/php-pear-Console-Table.spec SRPM: http://remi.collet.free.fr/rpms/extras/php-pear-Console-Table-1.0.5-2.fc5.src.rpm Mock: http://remi.collet.free.fr/rpms/extras/php-pear-Console-Table-build.log %changelog * Mon Sep 11 2006 Remi Collet 1.0.5-2 - don't own %%{pear_phpdir}/Console -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 11 18:38:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2006 14:38:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196101] Review Request: mimedefang In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609111838.k8BIcw4m018016@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mimedefang https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196101 ------- Additional Comments From redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de 2006-09-11 14:38 EST ------- Okay, fixed everything we talked about and pushing -3 now... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 11 18:42:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2006 14:42:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201000] Review Request: libFoundation - A free implementation of OpenStep's Foundation Kit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609111842.k8BIgatc018385@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libFoundation - A free implementation of OpenStep's Foundation Kit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201000 ------- Additional Comments From Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net 2006-09-11 14:42 EST ------- Thanks, I'll fix 17. Wrt license: It looks rather BSD-like (w/o attribution), but has some rewording. So I wouldn't call it OSI-approved, but it's otherwise an open source license as required. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 11 18:51:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2006 14:51:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206052] Review Request: php-pear-PHP-CompatInfo - Find out version and extensions required for a piece of code to ru n In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609111851.k8BIpFoS019290@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-PHP-CompatInfo - Find out version and extensions required for a piece of code to ru n Alias: pear-PHP-CompatInfo https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206052 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |chris.stone at gmail.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | Alias| |pear-PHP-CompatInfo -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 11 18:52:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2006 14:52:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206037] Review Request: php-pear-Console-Table - Class that makes it easy to build console style tables In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609111852.k8BIquci019496@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Console-Table - Class that makes it easy to build console style tables Alias: pear-Console-Table https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206037 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 11 19:01:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2006 15:01:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198613] Review Request: compat-libgda - gnome database access library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609111901.k8BJ1brs020236@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compat-libgda - gnome database access library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198613 denis at poolshark.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From denis at poolshark.org 2006-09-11 15:01 EST ------- Built for RawHide. You should be able to rebuild libgdamm now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 11 19:01:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2006 15:01:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199941] Review Request: gnome-python2-gda In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609111901.k8BJ1pGe020298@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-python2-gda https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199941 Bug 199941 depends on bug 198613, which changed state. Bug 198613 Summary: Review Request: compat-libgda - gnome database access library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198613 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 11 19:02:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2006 15:02:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201437] Review Request: Glom - Database designer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609111902.k8BJ21qE020328@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Glom - Database designer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201437 Bug 201437 depends on bug 198613, which changed state. Bug 198613 Summary: Review Request: compat-libgda - gnome database access library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198613 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 11 19:25:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2006 15:25:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196847] Review Request: php-pear-PHPUnit2 - PEAR: Regression testing framework for unit tests In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609111925.k8BJPNpp022087@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-PHPUnit2 - PEAR: Regression testing framework for unit tests Alias: php-pear-PHPUnit2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196847 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-09-11 15:25 EST ------- I'm going to go ahead and approve this. If you want to update to the alpha version, or someone else wants to approve the -alpha package, then that's fine with me. * source files match upstream: 95fe5e8dbb36462dd4d3f3daf8a4e8b3 PHPUnit2-2.3.6.tgz * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * dist tag is present. * build root is correct. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. License text is included in each source file. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * package installs properly * rpmlint is silent (except for the bogus warning) * final provides and requires are sane: php-pear(PHPUnit2) = 2.3.6 php-pear-PHPUnit2 = 2.3.6-1.fc6 = /bin/sh /usr/bin/pear /usr/bin/php php >= 5.0.2 php-pear(Benchmark) php-pear(Log) php-pear(PEAR) php-pecl(Xdebug) * %check is not present; not possible to run the test suite. * package is not relocatable. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 11 20:00:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2006 16:00:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205265] Review Request: libxml- Old libXML library for Gnome-1 application compatibility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609112000.k8BK0sIh024789@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libxml- Old libXML library for Gnome-1 application compatibility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205265 paul at city-fan.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-09-11 16:00 EST ------- 17043 (libxml): Build on target fedora-development-extras succeeded. Build logs may be found at http://buildsys.fedoraproject.org/logs/fedora-development-extras/17043-libxml-1.8.17-15.fc6/ owners.list updated, closing bug. Thanks for the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 11 20:00:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2006 16:00:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198244] Review Request: libglade In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609112000.k8BK0tFv024801@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libglade https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198244 Bug 198244 depends on bug 205265, which changed state. Bug 205265 Summary: Review Request: libxml- Old libXML library for Gnome-1 application compatibility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205265 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 11 20:02:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2006 16:02:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198613] Review Request: compat-libgda - gnome database access library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609112002.k8BK2LWu024988@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compat-libgda - gnome database access library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198613 ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2006-09-11 16:02 EST ------- Please also build for FC-5. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 11 20:03:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2006 16:03:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205300] Review Request: gtk-sharp - a set of mono bindings for gtk1.2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609112003.k8BK3UT6025108@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtk-sharp - a set of mono bindings for gtk1.2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205300 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-09-11 16:03 EST ------- Kevin : Andreas is on holiday for a while. Do you want to finish the review? According to Andreas, it's about fit to go -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 11 20:08:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2006 16:08:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201437] Review Request: Glom - Database designer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609112008.k8BK8qJ4025487@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Glom - Database designer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201437 Bug 201437 depends on bug 199943, which changed state. Bug 199943 Summary: Rebuild against compat-libgda https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199943 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE Status|NEW |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 11 20:25:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2006 16:25:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196591] Review Request: bitlbee In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609112025.k8BKPDCH027096@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bitlbee https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196591 ------- Additional Comments From paul at xtdnet.nl 2006-09-11 16:25 EST ------- condrestart still seems the proper way of doing it for xinetd. 1) don't try to send signals to non-existing processes 2) don't try and start something that isn't running 3) we don't want to return errors in exit codes when failing to signal something non-existing Is there any reason why *not* to use condrestart? Perhaps proftpd and uw-imapd send the signals because they also have a standalone mode without being run from inetd? I did not know about chkconfig not needing the --add command. Sorry about that. I would still like to see a new package to test. Or if you want to wait on the proxy testing, that's fine too, but that might take me a day or two to get around to. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 11 20:45:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2006 16:45:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196847] Review Request: php-pear-PHPUnit2 - PEAR: Regression testing framework for unit tests In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609112045.k8BKje1L028920@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-PHPUnit2 - PEAR: Regression testing framework for unit tests Alias: php-pear-PHPUnit2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196847 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 11 20:55:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2006 16:55:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196591] Review Request: bitlbee In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609112055.k8BKtPam029850@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bitlbee https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196591 ------- Additional Comments From redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de 2006-09-11 16:55 EST ------- BTW, "/sbin/service xinetd reload > /dev/null 2>&1 || :" will catch the return errors and exit codes. But I'll use condrestart, as I was wrong with the meaning when the scriptlet is executed (thought on upgrade rather on erasing). Finally, I would be very happy, if you could do the proxy testing, as it doesn't matter for me to wait for another days, now... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 11 21:10:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2006 17:10:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204954] Review Request: libofa - Open Fingerprint Architecture library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609112110.k8BLAFkf031033@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libofa - Open Fingerprint Architecture library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204954 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-09-11 17:10 EST ------- Here's what I used that still doesn't build (for me): Spec URL: http://kde-redhat.unl.edu/apt/kde-redhat/SPECS/libofa.spec SRPM URL: http://kde-redhat.unl.edu/apt/kde-redhat/all/SRPMS.testing/libofa-0.9.3-2.src.rpm mock result(s): http://kde-redhat.unl.edu/apt/kde-redhat/mock/fedora-6-i386-core-kde/libofa/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 11 21:10:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2006 17:10:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200064] Review Request: libpano12 : Library and tools for manipulating panoramic images In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609112110.k8BLARx7031063@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libpano12 : Library and tools for manipulating panoramic images https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200064 bruno at postle.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 11 21:22:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2006 17:22:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206052] Review Request: php-pear-PHP-CompatInfo - Find out version and extensions required for a piece of code to ru n In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609112122.k8BLMhdB032098@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-PHP-CompatInfo - Find out version and extensions required for a piece of code to ru n Alias: pear-PHP-CompatInfo https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206052 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2006-09-11 17:22 EST ------- - rpmlint output: W: php-pear-PHP-CompatInfo dangerous-command-in-%post install Okay. - package is named according to Package Naming Guidelines - spec filename matches package %{name} - package meets Packaging Guidelines - package licensed with open source compatible license - license field in spec matches actual license - license included in %doc - spec file written in American english - spec file is l3g1bL3 - sources match upstream 1198ca0995f7d75336b90d786253de5e PHP_CompatInfo-1.3.2.tgz - package successfully compiles and builds on x86_64 FC5 - All build dependecncies are listed in BuildRequires - package does not use locales - package does not contain shared libraries - package is not relocatable - package owns all directories it creates - no duplicate files in %files - File permissions are set properly - package contains proper %clean section - macro usage is consistent - package contains permissible code - no large documentation files - %doc does not affect runtime - no header files or static libraries - no pkgconfig files - no .so files - no devel package - no .la files - package is not a GUI needing .desktop files - Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages APPROVED (pending closure of blocker bugs) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 11 21:29:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2006 17:29:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187294] Review Request: gwyddion In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609112129.k8BLTTlf032438@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gwyddion https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187294 ------- Additional Comments From yeti at physics.muni.cz 2006-09-11 17:29 EST ------- Spec URI: http://gwyddion.net/download/test/gwyddion.spec SRPM URI: http://gwyddion.net/download/test/gwyddion-1.99.9-4.src.rpm * Mon Sep 11 2006 David Necas (Yeti) - 1.99.9-4 - Split plug-ins from devel to plugin-examples - Added gwyddion-1-99-9-crashes.patch fixing several crashes (from upstream) And now to the dependency issue. I'm afraid it's all upside down. A perl module *extends* the interpreter, it does not *use* it. A Perl module alone is equally useless with or without the interpreter, the only useful thing is something that uses both the interpreter and the module, i.e., a program. If you do not accept `I want to write perl programs/run 3rd party perl programs but don't have the perl interpreter' as a packaging problem (such a `problem' could be only `solved' by mandatory installation of every piece of software in the Universe), no case when depencencies are unmet can arise. And when no such case can arise, where is the dependency? For comparison with an area where things still work logically: how many -devel packages require gcc? I will save you counting: Zero. None. Nada. Not a single one. Why is it so? Because they do not really require gcc, they only provide extensions, although one needs gcc to use them in programs (or not to use, one needs gcc to compile stuff no matter he uses the extension or not). So the module -> interpreter dependency is not a hard dependency, but it still has a reason. It is a convenience dependency. We expect someone installing a perl module does it because (a) he installs it to fulfill requirements of a perl script, and the dependency is redundant then but does not harm, or (b) he wants to write perl scripts using this module, and here we save him some work -- of course, if he wishes to write scripts that do not use any module he still has to install perl himself but that's just it. Case (a) occurs when one installs gwyddion-plugin-examples (remember the dependency is a harmless redundancy here), case (b) does *not* occur because the module is not meant to be publicly used. [discursion] To see how far the expectation-based dependencies got from the real world, look at the `-devel requires pkgconfig' above. The dependency stated by the policy is actually nonsense, one can compile programs using the library without pkgconfig just fine (only with more manual work, and certain people will frown upon you, etc.). The real dependency is that a program whose configure script uses pkgconfig requires pkgconfig to build. [/discursion] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 11 23:04:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2006 19:04:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187294] Review Request: gwyddion In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609112304.k8BN4vYa006144@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gwyddion https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187294 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-09-11 19:04 EST ------- (In reply to comment #25) Still issues needing work: * I tested that the modules subpackage can be merged with the libs subpackage without any rpmlint warning and it certainly makes sense to merge those 2 subpackages. * gwyddion-plugin-examples requires /usr/bin/env instead of ruby and python. I guess that's due to the shebang beeing something like: #! /usr/bin/env python The python (and python modules, if needed) and ruby dependency should certainly be added (perl is allready picked up). * rpmlint dislikes public domain but likes Public Domain. I guess you should change it, or, alternatively, fill a bug report against rpmlint. > And now to the dependency issue. I'm afraid it's all upside down. > > A perl module *extends* the interpreter, it does not *use* it. I also uses it since the module is interpreted by the interpreter. > For comparison with an area where things still work logically: how many -devel > packages require gcc? I will save you counting: Zero. None. Nada. Not a single one. > > Why is it so? Because they do not really require gcc, they only provide > extensions, although one needs gcc to use them in programs (or not to use, one > needs gcc to compile stuff no matter he uses the extension or not). I agree that it is a valid analogy. It is not exactly the same, however, as one may argue that another compiler than gcc may be used. (and also it is a runtime dependency, not only a compile time dependency, but it is irrelevant, since other -devel packages, that are compile time dependencies are required). > So the module -> interpreter dependency is not a hard dependency, but it still > has a reason. It is a convenience dependency. We expect someone installing a > perl module does it because > > (a) he installs it to fulfill requirements of a perl script, and the dependency > is redundant then but does not harm, or > > (b) he wants to write perl scripts using this module, and here we save him some > work -- of course, if he wishes to write scripts that do not use any module he > still has to install perl himself but that's just it. > > Case (a) occurs when one installs gwyddion-plugin-examples (remember the > dependency is a harmless redundancy here), case (b) does *not* occur because the > module is not meant to be publicly used. I disagree with that, I think that we are in case (b). Even though it is not meant to be publicly used from the upstream point of view, in my opinion it is something that should be provided to the fedora user in case he wants to use the module. It is a regular module from the fedora point of view. If it could be easily packaged like a regular module it would have been better. Since it is too much work i think not having the modules as regular modules isn't a blocker. (example) plugins use them, so either they are packaged to be used or they shouldn't be packaged at all, and the example plugins shouldn't be packaged, in that case. But even though we are in case (b), I agree with your point about modules not stricly requiring interpreters (with the analogy with gcc, which could be extended to gcc/glibc-devel). perl dependencies are found automatically, however, so at least the perl module should be in a separate package for that reason (or perl dependencies should be removed), since the -libs package shouldn't bring in perl. So, regarding the requirement on interpreters and packaging in sub packages, I am not so sure now that it is a blocker (although I still think it is better...). Maybe I'll ask on the extras-list. > [discursion] > To see how far the expectation-based dependencies got from the real world, look > at the `-devel requires pkgconfig' above. The dependency stated by the policy > is actually nonsense, one can compile programs using the library without > pkgconfig just fine (only with more manual work, and certain people will frown > upon you, etc.). The real dependency is that a program whose configure script > uses pkgconfig requires pkgconfig to build. > [/discursion] If I remember well, the reason why pkgconfig should be a requires has been argued on the lists. I don't remember the reasons, but if you disagree with that idea, you can rise the issue on fedora-extras list. Anyway it always makes sense to Requires pkgconfig for the pkgconfig directory owning. Do you disagree with that? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 12 00:27:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2006 20:27:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205023] Review Request: filelight-1.0 - cool diskspace use browser for kde In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609120027.k8C0RkEi009335@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: filelight-1.0 - cool diskspace use browser for kde https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205023 ------- Additional Comments From ndbecker2 at verizon.net 2006-09-11 20:27 EST ------- Please see http://nbecker.dyndns.org:8080/RPM/filelight.spec http://nbecker.dyndns.org:8080/RPM/filelight-1.0-8.src.rpm Also, FE_NEEDSPONSOR is now correctly set? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 12 02:16:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2006 22:16:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193106] Review Request: gtkmozembedmm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609120216.k8C2GVat013327@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtkmozembedmm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193106 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-09-11 22:16 EST ------- 0. ok. 1. Can you provide a quick script to get the cvs version you are using? 2. Sounds reasonable. I think there is movement to get a seperate package that provides this in fc7+, but for now this is the best solution. 3, 4, 5, 6: ok. Now that I can get it to build in mock, rpmlint says: W: gtkmozembedmm unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib/libgtkmozembedmm- 1.4.so.0.0.0 E: gtkmozembedmm-debuginfo empty-debuginfo-package These two are likely the permissions on the library being 644 instead of 755, so they don't properly get stripped and debuginfo collected. Change that file to 755 and it should clear up those issues. E: gtkmozembedmm-devel only-non-binary-in-usr-lib Some of the path's look wrong: drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 0 Sep 11 20:08 /usr/lib/ gtkmozembedmm-1.4 drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 0 Sep 11 20:08 /usr/lib/ gtkmozembedmm-1.4/include -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 289 Sep 11 20:08 /usr/lib/ gtkmozembedmm-1.4/include/gtkmozembedmmconfig.h drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 0 Sep 11 20:08 /usr/lib/ gtkmozembedmm-1.4/proc drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 0 Sep 11 20:08 /usr/lib/ gtkmozembedmm-1.4/proc/m4 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 177 Sep 11 20:08 /usr/lib/ gtkmozembedmm-1.4/proc/m4/convert.m4 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1154 Sep 11 20:08 /usr/lib/ gtkmozembedmm-1.4/proc/m4/convert_gtkmozembedmm.m4 Shouldn't that be /usr/include/gtkmozembedmm/ ? not sure where the m4 files should go, but /usr/lib/ seems wrong... W: gtkmozembedmm-devel no-documentation This can be ignored. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 12 02:19:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2006 22:19:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204954] Review Request: libofa - Open Fingerprint Architecture library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609120219.k8C2J0r0013445@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libofa - Open Fingerprint Architecture library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204954 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-09-11 22:18 EST ------- (In reply to comment #10) > Here's what I used that still doesn't build (for me): > Spec URL: http://kde-redhat.unl.edu/apt/kde-redhat/SPECS/libofa.spec Yes, surely by your spec file, mock build fails. When you apply debian's patch by %patch1 -p1, it creates debian/ directory and debian-original files are made under the directory. You can see the "real patch" is created under debian/patches directory. So next time you have to apply the "real patch" under debian/patches created by %patch1 -p1. The spec file I used includes: ----------------------------------- %patch0 -p1 -b .deb patch -p1 -b --suffix .gcc41 < debian/patches/01_gcc41.diff ----------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 12 02:21:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2006 22:21:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204954] Review Request: libofa - Open Fingerprint Architecture library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609120221.k8C2LOV0013601@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libofa - Open Fingerprint Architecture library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204954 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-09-11 22:21 EST ------- Arg, didn't realize that the patch simply created another patch! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 12 02:37:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2006 22:37:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204954] Review Request: libofa - Open Fingerprint Architecture library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609120237.k8C2bi8d014652@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libofa - Open Fingerprint Architecture library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204954 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-09-11 22:37 EST ------- Spec URL: http://kde-redhat.unl.edu/apt/kde-redhat/SPECS/libofa.spec SRPM URL: http://kde-redhat.unl.edu/apt/kde-redhat/all/SRPMS.testing/libofa-0.9.3-3.src.rpm %changelog * Mon Sep 11 2006 Rex Dieter 0.9.3-3 - use gcc41 patch extracted from debian's patchset -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 12 03:08:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2006 23:08:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204954] Review Request: libofa - Open Fingerprint Architecture library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609120308.k8C382np016925@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libofa - Open Fingerprint Architecture library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204954 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 12 06:36:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 02:36:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204954] Review Request: libofa - Open Fingerprint Architecture library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609120636.k8C6axMu026232@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libofa - Open Fingerprint Architecture library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204954 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-09-12 02:36 EST ------- Okay. I will review this package. First review: 1. From http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines : * rpmlint - is not silent. W: libofa wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/libofa-0.9.3/README - The following files have wrong (Windows-like) end-of-line encoding. libofa-0.9.3-3.fc6/libofa-0.9.3-gcc41.patch libofa-0.9.3-3.fc6/usr/share/doc/libofa-0.9.3/README libofa-debuginfo-0.9.3-3.fc6/usr/src/debug/libofa-0.9.3/lib/AFLIB/aflibConverter.cpp libofa-debuginfo-0.9.3-3.fc6/usr/src/debug/libofa-0.9.3/lib/AFLIB/aflibConverter.h libofa-debuginfo-0.9.3-3.fc6/usr/src/debug/libofa-0.9.3/lib/AFLIB/aflibConverterLargeFilter.h libofa-debuginfo-0.9.3-3.fc6/usr/src/debug/libofa-0.9.3/lib/AFLIB/aflibConverterSmallFilter.h libofa-debuginfo-0.9.3-3.fc6/usr/src/debug/libofa-0.9.3/lib/JAMA/jama_svd.h libofa-debuginfo-0.9.3-3.fc6/usr/src/debug/libofa-0.9.3/lib/JAMA/tnt_array1d.h libofa-debuginfo-0.9.3-3.fc6/usr/src/debug/libofa-0.9.3/lib/JAMA/tnt_array2d.h libofa-debuginfo-0.9.3-3.fc6/usr/src/debug/libofa-0.9.3/lib/JAMA/tnt_math_utils.h libofa-debuginfo-0.9.3-3.fc6/usr/src/debug/libofa-0.9.3/lib/fft_op.cpp libofa-debuginfo-0.9.3-3.fc6/usr/src/debug/libofa-0.9.3/lib/fftlibw3_op.cpp libofa-debuginfo-0.9.3-3.fc6/usr/src/debug/libofa-0.9.3/lib/frametracker_op.cpp libofa-debuginfo-0.9.3-3.fc6/usr/src/debug/libofa-0.9.3/lib/frametracker_op.h libofa-debuginfo-0.9.3-3.fc6/usr/src/debug/libofa-0.9.3/lib/trackdata_op.cpp libofa-debuginfo-0.9.3-3.fc6/usr/src/debug/libofa-0.9.3/lib/trackdata_op.h libofa-debuginfo-0.9.3-3.fc6/usr/src/debug/libofa-0.9.3/lib/trackframe_op.cpp libofa-debuginfo-0.9.3-3.fc6/usr/src/debug/libofa-0.9.3/lib/trackframe_op.h libofa-debuginfo-0.9.3-3.fc6/usr/src/debug/libofa-0.9.3/lib/tracklist_op.cpp libofa-debuginfo-0.9.3-3.fc6/usr/src/debug/libofa-0.9.3/lib/tracklist_op.h libofa-devel-0.9.3-3.fc6/usr/include/ofa1/ofa.h W: libofa mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (this is srpm) W: libofa-devel no-documentation (ignored) * Requires: - Requires for -devel package cannot be supplied automatically, which must be found by manual check. libofa-devel-0.9.3-3.fc6/usr/lib/pkgconfig/libofa.pc says: Requires: fftw3 Libs: -L${libdir} -lofa -lexpat -lm Cflags: -I${includedir} This means that libofa-devel requires fftw3-devel, expat-devel (and libofa). 2. From http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines : * MUST: The sources used to build the package.... Umm? I cannot find Source0. I can find .tar.gz. 3. Other things I have noticed: = Nothing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 12 07:39:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 03:39:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204162] Review Request: perl-Heap - Perl extension for keeping data partially sorted In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609120739.k8C7d6hY029246@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Heap - Perl extension for keeping data partially sorted https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204162 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-09-12 03:39 EST ------- It wasn't that easy since the tag perl-Heap-0_71-1 was sticky. What I did was $ cvs up -r perl-Heap-0_71-1 devel U devel/.cvsignore U devel/Makefile U devel/perl-Heap.spec U devel/sources $ cd devel $ cvs up -A cvs update: .cvsignore is no longer in the repository cvs update: Makefile is no longer in the repository cvs update: perl-Heap.spec is no longer in the repository cvs update: sources is no longer in the repository $ cvs add Makefile perl-Heap.spec sources .cvsignore U Makefile U perl-Heap.spec U sources U .cvsignore At that point things were fine, no sticky tag, I could update the files, commit and build. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 12 08:03:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 04:03:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187294] Review Request: gwyddion In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609120803.k8C83YjF031333@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gwyddion https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187294 ------- Additional Comments From yeti at physics.muni.cz 2006-09-12 04:03 EST ------- Spec URI: http://gwyddion.net/download/test/gwyddion.spec SRPM URI: http://gwyddion.net/download/test/gwyddion-1.99.9-5.src.rpm * Tue Sep 12 2006 David Necas (Yeti) - 1.99.9-5 - Capitalized plugin-examples license to `Public Domain' to placate rpmlint - Re-merged modules to libs. - Added explicit interpreter dependencies to plugin-examples. (In reply to comment #26) > * I tested that the modules subpackage can be merged with the libs > subpackage without any rpmlint warning and it certainly makes sense to > merge those 2 subpackages. You are right. I wonder what rpmlint version I was using... > * gwyddion-plugin-examples requires /usr/bin/env instead > of ruby and python. Fixed. > * rpmlint dislikes public domain but likes Public Domain. Whatever rpmlint likes. > > A perl module *extends* the interpreter, it does not *use* it. > > I also uses it since the module is interpreted by the interpreter. I'm not convinced the techincal details of how the interpreter is extended (it dlopens a shared library and calls some functions -- or it reads and interprets some high-level code) affect what consistutes a dependency. > I disagree with that, I think that we are in case (b). Even though > it is not meant to be publicly used from the upstream point of > view, in my opinion it is something that should be provided to > the fedora user in case he wants to use the module. It is a regular > module from the fedora point of view. If it could be easily packaged > like a regular module it would have been better. Since it is too much > work i think not having the modules as regular modules isn't a blocker. The work is not the problem for me. The problem is to introduce 3 more subpackages, each with a single module and README.Fedora saying something along the lines `This module was made public due to Fedora requirements, but do not actually use it.' This would be rather silly. > If I remember well, the reason why pkgconfig should be a requires has > been argued on the lists. I don't remember the reasons, but if you > disagree with that idea, you can rise the issue on fedora-extras list. > Anyway it always makes sense to Requires pkgconfig for the pkgconfig > directory owning. Do you disagree with that? I'm not bothered much by the expectation-based dependency in the case of pkgconfig, because the expectation is often right (unlike our case, although you don't agree) and pkgconfig is a small program without any further dependencies (unlike for example python). But to require a tool *only* to get a directory to put files to, that would be indeed a packaging problem IMO. The point was that expectation-based dependencies (Recommends/Suggests in Debian) and not hard dependencies are must be added with forethought. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 12 09:09:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 05:09:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206122] New: Review Request: guiloader - Gideon GuiXML library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206122 Summary: Review Request: guiloader - Gideon GuiXML library Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: denis at poolshark.org QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.poolshark.org/src/guiloader.spec SRPM URL: http://www.poolshark.org/src/guiloader-2.8.0-1.src.rpm Description: GuiLoader is a high-performance and compact GuiXml loader library. This library allows GTK+ applications to create GUI widgets and objects at run-time from GuiXml resource files. GuiLoader is written in C language as a GObject subclass and has a trivial language-independent API. GuiLoader was designed to be easily wrapped for any language that has GTK+ bindings. Notes: - guiloader is part of the gideon project and used to be packaged in the gideon tarball itself. This review therefore blocks that of Gideon. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 12 09:11:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 05:11:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 175168] Review Request: gideon - GUI designer for GTK/C++ In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609120911.k8C9BNDd003744@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gideon - GUI designer for GTK/C++ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175168 denis at poolshark.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |206122 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 12 09:49:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 05:49:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203520] Review Request: evolution-brutus In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609120949.k8C9nsLR006929@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: evolution-brutus Alias: evolution-brutus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203520 ------- Additional Comments From colding at omesc.com 2006-09-12 05:49 EST ------- (In reply to comment #28) > -------------------------------------------------- > I cannot sponsor you because I am not a member of > sponsors. I can do only pre-review of this package. > -------------------------------------------------- Yes, but I want to express my gratitude to you for doing this pre-review anyway. Thanks! > 1. From http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines : > > * Timestamps > - These packages include many text files and preserving timestamps > is then preferable. Try to keep timestamps (can this package > accept 'make INSTALL="install -c -p" install'?) Fixed. > * File and Directory Ownership > - The following directories are not owned by any packages. > /usr/include/evolution-data-server-1.8/brutus/ > /usr/share/idl/brutus/ Fixed I hope. I added the directories before the files within them and prefixed with the %dir directive. That should fix it, right? > 2. From http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines : > = Nothing. > > 3. Other things I have noticed : > - Well, %{find_lang} %{name}-2.8 perhaps means: > Conflicts: evolution < 2.7 > Conflicts: evolution >= 2.9 I am not sure if anything is wrong here. The "2.8" version tag is autogenerated during autogen.sh execution from the spec.in file. I can see that it would complicate matters if the SRPM that is generated for FC6 is used under, say, FC5. Should I completely drop the version tag here? New release here: Spec URL: http://www.omesc.com/content/downloads/dist/Fedora%20Core%206/SPECS/evolution-brutus.spec SRPM URL: http://www.omesc.com/content/downloads/dist/Fedora%20Core%206/SRPMS/evolution-brutus-1.1.6-9.src.rpm Thanks, jules -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 12 09:59:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 05:59:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187294] Review Request: gwyddion In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609120959.k8C9xfk1007770@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gwyddion https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187294 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-09-12 05:59 EST ------- A quick note, there is a /sbin/ldconfig which is certainly forgotten in %postun (and another one, there are still dependencies on perl in -libs, but it could be sorted out when there is an agreement on the split) rpmlint output is now ignorable W: gwyddion-devel no-dependency-on gwyddion E: gwyddion-devel only-non-binary-in-usr-lib W: gwyddion-plugin-examples no-documentation (In reply to comment #27) > I'm not convinced the techincal details of how the interpreter is extended (it > dlopens a shared library and calls some functions -- or it reads and interprets > some high-level code) affect what consistutes a dependency. That was not my point. What I was saying is that, unlike -devel package which is needed at compile time only, modules are needed at runtime, and are directly used (or run if you prefer) by the interpreter. Not important. > The work is not the problem for me. The problem is to introduce 3 more > subpackages, each with a single module and README.Fedora saying something along > the lines `This module was made public due to Fedora requirements, but do not > actually use it.' This would be rather silly. I don't want to force you to do anything but package things consistently. I don't have any problem with not packaging at all the modules and example plugins. But in case they are packaged they should be packaged such that they are easy to use by users, which means that what the best would be to have them available as classical modules. And if it is not the case, they should be packaged like modules. > I'm not bothered much by the expectation-based dependency in the case of > pkgconfig, because the expectation is often right (unlike our case, although you > don't agree) and pkgconfig is a small program without any further dependencies > (unlike for example python). But to require a tool *only* to get a directory to > put files to, that would be indeed a packaging problem IMO. That won't necessarily be a packaging problem. Indeed you have to chose between alternatives regarding directory ownership, and none are pretty: * add a package that only holds the directory (filesystem) * depend on a package that holds the directory but also provide other and maybe unneeded things (pkgconfig, automake for /usr/share/aclocal/) * have all the packages own the directory (/usr/share/gtk-doc/html/) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 12 11:27:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 07:27:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205798] Review Request: xine-lib - The Xine library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609121127.k8CBRGCJ012813@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xine-lib - The Xine library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205798 ------- Additional Comments From gauret at free.fr 2006-09-12 07:27 EST ------- Ah yes, sorry. This version actually builds... * Tue Sep 12 2006 Aurelien Bompard 1.1.2-13 - drop patches 2 and 4 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 12 11:30:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 07:30:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205798] Review Request: xine-lib - The Xine library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609121130.k8CBU8MD013043@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xine-lib - The Xine library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205798 ------- Additional Comments From gauret at free.fr 2006-09-12 07:29 EST ------- http://gauret.free.fr/fichiers/rpms/fedora/xine-lib-1.1.2-13.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 12 11:41:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 07:41:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206134] New: Review Request: guiloader-c++ - C++ Binding to GuiLoader Library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206134 Summary: Review Request: guiloader-c++ - C++ Binding to GuiLoader Library Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: denis at poolshark.org QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.poolshark.org/src/guiloader-c++.spec SRPM URL: http://www.poolshark.org/src/guiloader-c++-2.8.0-1.src.rpm Description: GuiLoader/C++ is a C++ binding to GuiLoader library. It is a convenience layer that simplifies development of GuiLoader based applications written in C++ language by introducing exception safety, binding GTK+ objects defined in GuiXml to C++ variables and type-safe dynamic connection to signals. Notes: Like guiloader, this package is part of the Gideon project (GUI designer for C++ Gtk2/Gnome apps) and used to be part of the gideon tarball. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 12 11:42:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 07:42:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206122] Review Request: guiloader - Gideon GuiXML library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609121142.k8CBgDG9013925@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: guiloader - Gideon GuiXML library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206122 denis at poolshark.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |206134 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 12 11:42:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 07:42:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 175168] Review Request: gideon - GUI designer for GTK/C++ In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609121142.k8CBgkK9014030@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gideon - GUI designer for GTK/C++ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175168 denis at poolshark.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |206134 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 12 12:16:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 08:16:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 175168] Review Request: gideon - GUI designer for GTK/C++ In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609121216.k8CCGuNm018241@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gideon - GUI designer for GTK/C++ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175168 ------- Additional Comments From denis at poolshark.org 2006-09-12 08:16 EST ------- http://www.poolshark.org/src/gideon-2.8.0-1.src.rpm http://www.poolshark.org/src/gideon.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 12 12:31:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 08:31:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188477] Review Request: maildrop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609121231.k8CCVuu0019539@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: maildrop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188477 ------- Additional Comments From ndbecker2 at verizon.net 2006-09-12 08:31 EST ------- Check this: http://www.enlartenment.com/packages/fedora/5/SRPMS/courier-authlib-0.58-1.fc5.mf.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 12 13:07:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 09:07:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204954] Review Request: libofa - Open Fingerprint Architecture library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609121307.k8CD76hu022445@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libofa - Open Fingerprint Architecture library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204954 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-09-12 09:06 EST ------- Spec URL: http://kde-redhat.unl.edu/apt/kde-redhat/SPECS/libofa.spec SRPM URL: http://kde-redhat.unl.edu/apt/kde-redhat/all/SRPMS.testing/libofa-0.9.3-4.src.rpm %changelog * Tue Sep 12 2006 Rex Dieter 0.9.3-4 - remove extrenous entries from libofa.pc - dos2unix README - fix url in Source0 - -devel: %doc examples/ NOTE: can't change encoding of gcc41.patch, since the file it patches is a DOS text file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 12 13:27:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 09:27:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205955] Review Request: gdal - A translator library for raster geospatial data formats In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609121327.k8CDREId023746@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gdal - A translator library for raster geospatial data formats https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205955 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2006-09-12 09:27 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > Okay. I will review this package. > First review: > > 1. From http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines : > > * License: > - Well, how can I know that this package can be distributed under > MIT? It seems that main package does not include any licence > document. By checking/examining the source files - Only them are legally binding. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 12 13:37:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 09:37:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203662] Review Request: dx - Open source version of IBM's Visualization Data Explorer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609121337.k8CDbAcm024467@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dx - Open source version of IBM's Visualization Data Explorer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203662 ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2006-09-12 09:37 EST ------- http://rpm.greysector.net/extras/dx.spec http://rpm.greysector.net/extras/dx-4.4.0-4.src.rpm - moved arch.mak to _includedir/dx - fixed program startup from the main ui -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 12 13:37:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 09:37:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205057] Review Request: dx-samples - OpenDX Examples In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609121337.k8CDbntp024593@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dx-samples - OpenDX Examples https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205057 ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2006-09-12 09:37 EST ------- http://rpm.greysector.net/extras/dx-samples.spec http://rpm.greysector.net/extras/dx-samples-4.4.0-2.src.rpm - fixed Requires: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 12 13:58:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 09:58:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204954] Review Request: libofa - Open Fingerprint Architecture library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609121358.k8CDwT1E025975@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libofa - Open Fingerprint Architecture library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204954 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-09-12 09:58 EST ------- (In reply to comment #15) > %changelog > * Tue Sep 12 2006 Rex Dieter 0.9.3-4 > - remove extrenous entries from libofa.pc > - dos2unix README > - fix url in Source0 > - -devel: %doc examples/ > > NOTE: can't change encoding of gcc41.patch, since the file it patches is a DOS > text file. Actually you could if you did a dos2unix on the file to be patched before applying the patch. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 12 14:00:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 10:00:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204954] Review Request: libofa - Open Fingerprint Architecture library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609121400.k8CE0oO7026173@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libofa - Open Fingerprint Architecture library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204954 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-09-12 10:00 EST ------- > Actually you could if you did a dos2unix on the file to be patched before > applying the patch. For no other purpose than to make rpmlint happy? No thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 12 14:19:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 10:19:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199405] Review Request: vtk - The Visualization Toolkit - A high level 3D visualization library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609121419.k8CEJ2oH027684@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vtk - The Visualization Toolkit - A high level 3D visualization library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199405 ------- Additional Comments From jamatos at fc.up.pt 2006-09-12 10:18 EST ------- What is the status of this bug report? Patrice do you want to do a formal review? Some points that I think should be addressed before this packages is accepted, those referred by Patrice like the removal of the patented code are a must. Review for release 11.at: * RPM name is OK * Source vtk-5.0.1.tar.gz is the same as upstream * This is the latest version * Builds fine in mock Needs work: * BuildRoot should be %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) (wiki: PackagingGuidelines#BuildRoot) * BuildRequires: gcc-c++ should not be included (wiki: PackagingGuidelines#Exceptions) * Spec file: some paths are not replaced with RPM macros (wiki: QAChecklist item 7) This is relevant in the case of /usr/lib/, is this on purpose? This shows in rpmlint of the source rpm: E: vtk hardcoded-library-path in %{_prefix}/lib/*`" E: vtk hardcoded-library-path in %{_prefix}/lib/* Minor: * QT environment variable are not sourced Looking to the debug file I see that there are source files there: /usr/src/debug/VTK Is this intended? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 12 14:23:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 10:23:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204954] Review Request: libofa - Open Fingerprint Architecture library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609121423.k8CENHAV028027@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libofa - Open Fingerprint Architecture library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204954 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-09-12 10:22 EST ------- Second review: * rpmlint - is not yet silent: W: libofa macro-in-%changelog doc W: libofa mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (this is for src.rpm) W: libofa-devel hidden-file-or-dir /usr/share/doc/libofa-devel-0.9.3/examples/.deps W: libofa-devel hidden-file-or-dir /usr/share/doc/libofa-devel-0.9.3/examples/.deps - Use %%doc, not %doc in %changelog entry. - Remove spaces or tabs in spec file and unify spacing. - examples/.deps is needed? - Well, this wiki page discourages to use unix2dos and actually, unix2dos is not needed. Also, changing the end-of-file encodings of souce files (i.e. .h or .cpp files) is done by: for f in `find . -name README -or -name \*.cpp -or -name \*.h` ; do \ sed -i -e 's|\r||' $f ; done in %prep stage. Then removing DOS-like encoding of patch file (Patch1) can be done. Changing the end-of file encoding of \*.cpp, \*.h files is needed because they are finally included in debuginfo rpm. * Well, removing external dependency from .pc file is correct? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 12 15:13:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 11:13:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205887] Review Request: perl-HTTP-Body - HTTP Body Parser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609121513.k8CFDuNO000359@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-HTTP-Body - HTTP Body Parser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205887 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-09-12 11:13 EST ------- I had to change the %check section to: make test TEST_POD=1 to actually test everything; with that, I get: All tests successful. Files=6, Tests=77, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.59 cusr + 0.12 csys = 0.71 CPU) The provides/requires list is now: perl(HTTP::Body) = 0.6 perl(HTTP::Body::MultiPart) perl(HTTP::Body::OctetStream) perl(HTTP::Body::UrlEncoded) perl-HTTP-Body = 0.6-2.fc6 = perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8) perl(Carp) perl(File::Temp) >= 0.14 perl(HTTP::Body::MultiPart) perl(HTTP::Body::OctetStream) perl(HTTP::Body::UrlEncoded) perl(IO::File) perl(YAML) >= 0.39 perl(base) perl(bytes) perl(strict) which is fine. So: APPROVED just tack on TEST_POD=1 when you check in. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 12 15:26:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 11:26:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199405] Review Request: vtk - The Visualization Toolkit - A high level 3D visualization library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609121526.k8CFQcbN001200@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vtk - The Visualization Toolkit - A high level 3D visualization library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199405 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-09-12 11:26 EST ------- (In reply to comment #17) > What is the status of this bug report? The licence issue is a blocker, and maybe also the inclusion of other packages within vtk. > Patrice do you want to do a formal review? I am waiting for the current issues to be solved before I continue reviewing, but I don't really care whether I am the formal reviewer or not. > Needs work: > * BuildRoot should > be %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) > (wiki: PackagingGuidelines#BuildRoot) The BuildRoot in the spec file is also right now. > * BuildRequires: gcc-c++ should not be included > (wiki: PackagingGuidelines#Exceptions) It could be included (this is not a blocker), but I agree that it is better without. > This is relevant in the case of /usr/lib/, is this on purpose? > This shows in rpmlint of the source rpm: > E: vtk hardcoded-library-path in %{_prefix}/lib/*`" > E: vtk hardcoded-library-path in %{_prefix}/lib/* Seems like there is something unclean in the code... > Minor: > * QT environment variable are not sourced This may not be so minor, since it may lead to issues on lib64 architectures with some qt versions. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 12 15:30:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 11:30:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205955] Review Request: gdal - A translator library for raster geospatial data formats In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609121530.k8CFU5eU001375@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gdal - A translator library for raster geospatial data formats https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205955 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at soeterbroek.com 2006-09-12 11:30 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > Okay. I will review this package. Thank you for reviewing. I have fixed most, but not all, issues (see replies below for details): ----------------------------------------- Spec URL: http://www.soeterbroek.com/linux/fedora/extras/gdal/gdal.spec SRPM URL: http://www.soeterbroek.com/linux/fedora/extras/gdal/gdal-1.3.2-2.fc6.src.rpm * Sun Sep 10 2006 Joost Soeterbroek 1.3.2-2 - change macros in changelog to prevent expansion - use %%{?dist} tag - change all tabs into two spaces - remove python-abi req - add python-numeric req to -python package - drop %%makeinstall macro - add timestamps to make install with option 'INSTALL="install -c -p"' - drop %%{python_sitearch} from %%files python - add full URL to Source - exclude /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/_gdalmodule.la - fixed misc. packaging issues ----------------------------------------- > First review: > > 1. From http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines : > > * License: > - Well, how can I know that this package can be distributed under > MIT? It seems that main package does not include any licence > document. see comment #2 > * rpmlint: > - is not silent. > W: gdal macro-in-%changelog configure > W: gdal macro-in-%changelog configure > - Use %% in changelog so as the description in changelog is not > expanded. done > W: gdal mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs > - if it is difficult finding where tabs are used, use > "sed -i -e 's|\t| |g' gdal.spec", which automatically changes > tabs in spec file into two spaces. done > * Tags: > - use %?dist tag done > * Requires: > - -python package requires python-numeric as gdal_merge.py includes > the line: "import Numeric" (this dependency cannot be automatically > checked). done > * BuildRequires: > - libjpeg-devel, zlib-devel, netcdf-devel <- required by hdf-devel > (ditto requires for -devel package) I am unsure what you mean with this one. Afaik all BuildRequires are allready present in the spec file. > * Encoding > - Several text files are encoded in ISO-8859. Change the encoding > to UTF-8 unless it is necessary. > - ./gdal-1.3.2-1/usr/share/gdal/seed_2d.dgn: Microstation > ./gdal-1.3.2-1/usr/share/gdal/seed_3d.dgn: data > Well, what are these files? Could you give me some examples? I am not really clear on what I am supposed to do here. > * Why the %makeinstall macro should not be used > - Don't use %makeinstall done > * Timestamps > - These (gdal) package contains lots of text files, so keeping > timestamps is preferable. Keep timestamps of those files (usually > 'make install' accepts the option 'INSTALL="install -c -p"'. done > * File and Directory Ownership > - Don't own the directory %python_sitearch itself. done > 2. From http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines > > * MUST: The sources used to build the package must match.... > - Specify the URL of the source. I cannot verify is the source is > correct. done > * MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, > - /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/_gdalmodule.la - should be removed. done > * SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package functions as described > - I have not yet checked if these packages functionally work well > as desired. Please give me some simple examples if you can. Ok, I'll play around with some of the example data files in ftp://ftp.remotesensing.org/pub/gdal/data/. I will need some help from (upstream) community though, in order to make some sense of input and (expected) output data. > 3. Other things I have noticed: > * Packaging issue: > - in %prep stage: > - %patch0 -p0: it is preferable that the suffix for original files is > specified. done > - cd %{_builddir}/%{name}-%{version} is not necessary. The working > directory at this stage is it. done > - in file entry: > - Don't use %exclude unless there is no way to avoid > using %exclude (such as %exclude %{_bindir}/*.pyc) > as it makes file entry somewhat complicate. > For example, specify %{_bindir}, %{_mandir}/man1/ > entry so as not to use %exclude. > Especially: > - Explicitly REMOVE the files which are not included in any > packages in %install stage (such as static archive) done > - I doubt that -devel package should have html directory. > Owning files under html directory is sufficient. i.e: > I suspect that %doc html should be %doc html/* done One major issue I still have is with some programs in the *-bin package: $ gdalinfo mkdir: cannot create directory `/usr/bin/.libs': Permission denied /usr/bin/ld: cannot open output file /usr/bin/.libs/22786-lt-gdalinfo: No such file or directory collect2: ld returned 1 exit status -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 12 15:31:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 11:31:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204954] Review Request: libofa - Open Fingerprint Architecture library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609121531.k8CFV63e001592@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libofa - Open Fingerprint Architecture library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204954 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-09-12 11:30 EST ------- > * Well, removing external dependency from .pc file is correct? Yeah, I'm pretty sure. If problems arise, we can always add them back. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 12 15:33:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 11:33:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204954] Review Request: libofa - Open Fingerprint Architecture library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609121533.k8CFX5DW001744@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libofa - Open Fingerprint Architecture library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204954 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-09-12 11:33 EST ------- Spec URL: http://kde-redhat.unl.edu/apt/kde-redhat/SPECS/libofa.spec SRPM URL: http://kde-redhat.unl.edu/apt/kde-redhat/all/SRPMS.testing/libofa-0.9.3-5.src.rpm %changelog * Tue Sep 12 2006 Rex Dieter 0.9.3-5 - use sed instead of dos2unix - omit examples/.deps -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 12 15:35:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 11:35:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199405] Review Request: vtk - The Visualization Toolkit - A high level 3D visualization library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609121535.k8CFZVXX001942@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vtk - The Visualization Toolkit - A high level 3D visualization library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199405 ------- Additional Comments From Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net 2006-09-12 11:35 EST ------- This is not the latest version, 5.0.2 has recently been published and I'm testing builds with it. The hardcoded lib are a wrong positive from rpmlint. Is this what you refer to with "some paths are not replaced with RPM macros"? "QT environment variable are not sourced": There is no need to do so, qt-devel takes care of that. debuginfo: Why shouldn't it contain source files? I'm no debuginfo expert/user, but it seems that this is what find-debuginfo.sh wants to place in debuginfo. On legal/patent issues: I tried to contact upstream, as some people claim that the algorithms used are also patented, but there was no response yet. Previous releases contained a list of functions containing patented material, now that list is gone. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 12 15:45:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 11:45:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204954] Review Request: libofa - Open Fingerprint Architecture library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609121545.k8CFjTYl002909@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libofa - Open Fingerprint Architecture library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204954 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-09-12 11:45 EST ------- Spec URL: http://kde-redhat.unl.edu/apt/kde-redhat/SPECS/libofa.spec SRPM URL: http://kde-redhat.unl.edu/apt/kde-redhat/all/SRPMS.testing/libofa-0.9.3-6.src.rpm %changelog * Tue Sep 12 2006 Rex Dieter 0.9.3-6 - de-DOS'ify .cpp, .h files too -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 12 15:49:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 11:49:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206037] Review Request: php-pear-Console-Table - Class that makes it easy to build console style tables In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609121549.k8CFn22C003276@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Console-Table - Class that makes it easy to build console style tables Alias: pear-Console-Table https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206037 Fedora at FamilleCollet.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 12 15:49:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 11:49:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206052] Review Request: php-pear-PHP-CompatInfo - Find out version and extensions required for a piece of code to ru n In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609121549.k8CFnEig003301@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-PHP-CompatInfo - Find out version and extensions required for a piece of code to ru n Alias: pear-PHP-CompatInfo https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206052 Bug 206052 depends on bug 206037, which changed state. Bug 206037 Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Console-Table - Class that makes it easy to build console style tables https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206037 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 12 15:51:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 11:51:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203520] Review Request: evolution-brutus In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609121551.k8CFpRjD003403@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: evolution-brutus Alias: evolution-brutus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203520 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-09-12 11:51 EST ------- -------------------------------------------------- I cannot sponsor you because I am not a member of sponsors. I can do only pre-review of this package. -------------------------------------------------- * Well, another unowned directory is found: /usr/include/brutusd-1.0/ * Well, "2.8" tag is actually related with evolution version. configure says: GETTEXT_PACKAGE=evolution-brutus-${EVOLUTION_VERSION} and po/Makefile.in.in says: echo "installing $$lang.gmo as $$dir/$(GETTEXT_PACKAGE).mo" So, the line %{find_lang} %{name}-2.8 should be changed according to the version of evolution. If this src.rpm is supposed to be used both on FC6-devel and FC5, then the suffix of "2.8" must be automatically changed. One way to do this is: -------------------------------------------------------- for f in %{_bindir}/evolution-* ; do evover=${f#%{_bindir}/evolution-} done %{find_lang} %{name}-${evover} --------------------------------------------------------- With applying this, the version-specific conflict for evolution can be removed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 12 16:06:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 12:06:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205955] Review Request: gdal - A translator library for raster geospatial data formats In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609121606.k8CG6rCZ004690@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gdal - A translator library for raster geospatial data formats https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205955 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-09-12 12:06 EST ------- Before checking 1.3.2-2: (In reply to comment #3) > > * BuildRequires: > > - libjpeg-devel, zlib-devel, netcdf-devel <- required by hdf-devel > > (ditto requires for -devel package) > > I am unsure what you mean with this one. Afaik all BuildRequires are allready > present in the spec file. I meant that: "libjpeg-devel, zlib-devel, netcdf-devel" is required by hdf-devel, so adding "libjpeg-devel, zlib-devel, netcdf-devel" for BuildRequires (or Requires on -devel package) is unnecessary because hdf-devel pulls them anyway. > > > * Encoding > > - Several text files are encoded in ISO-8859. Change the encoding > > to UTF-8 unless it is necessary. > Could you give me some examples? Well, gdal-1.3.2-1/usr/share/gdal/cubewerx_extra.wkt: ISO-8859 English text, with very long lines gdal-1.3.2-1/usr/share/gdal/s57expectedinput.csv: ISO-8859 English text gdal-1.3.2-1/usr/share/gdal/prime_meridian.csv: ISO-8859 text gdal-debuginfo-1.3.2-1/usr/src/debug/gdal-1.3.2/frmts/rmf/rmfdataset.cpp: ISO-8859 English text gdal-devel-1.3.2-1/usr/include/gdal/cpl_win32ce_api.h: ISO-8859 English text gdal-devel-1.3.2-1/usr/include/gdal/cpl_wince.h:ISO-8859 English text Also, one file has wrong end-of-line encoding. gdal-debuginfo-1.3.2-1/usr/src/debug/gdal-1.3.2/frmts/nitf/nitffile.c: ASCII English text, with CRLF, LF line terminators > > - ./gdal-1.3.2-1/usr/share/gdal/seed_2d.dgn: Microstation > > ./gdal-1.3.2-1/usr/share/gdal/seed_3d.dgn: data > > Well, what are these files? I simply want to know what these files are. done > > One major issue I still have is with some programs in the *-bin package: > > $ gdalinfo > mkdir: cannot create directory `/usr/bin/.libs': Permission denied > /usr/bin/ld: cannot open output file /usr/bin/.libs/22786-lt-gdalinfo: No such > file or directory > collect2: ld returned 1 exit status > I will check this after. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 12 16:13:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 12:13:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206052] Review Request: php-pear-PHP-CompatInfo - Find out version and extensions required for a piece of code to ru n In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609121613.k8CGDXb2005109@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-PHP-CompatInfo - Find out version and extensions required for a piece of code to ru n Alias: pear-PHP-CompatInfo https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206052 Fedora at FamilleCollet.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 12 16:18:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 12:18:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 181450] Review Request: clamav-exim - Clam AV support files for Exim In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609121618.k8CGI1Cb005552@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clamav-exim - Clam AV support files for Exim https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=181450 ------- Additional Comments From dwmw2 at redhat.com 2006-09-12 12:17 EST ------- I've actually already added this support in a subpackage of exim: exim-clamav. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 12 16:21:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 12:21:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204954] Review Request: libofa - Open Fingerprint Architecture library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609121621.k8CGLTha005744@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libofa - Open Fingerprint Architecture library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204954 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-09-12 12:21 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=136085) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=136085&action=view) Mock build log of libofa-0.9.3-6 (failed) I cannot rebuild -6 src.rpm + rm -rf rpmdocs + mkdir -p rpmdocs + cp -a examples rpmdocs/ + make -C rpmdocs/examples clean make: Entering directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/libofa-0.9.3/rpmdocs/examples' cd .. && make am--refresh make[1]: Entering directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/libofa-0.9.3/rpmdocs' make[1]: *** No rule to make target `am--refresh'. Stop. make[1]: Leaving directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/libofa-0.9.3/rpmdocs' make: *** [../configure] Error 2 make: Leaving directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/libofa-0.9.3/rpmdocs/examples' error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.25351 (%install) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 12 16:24:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 12:24:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204954] Review Request: libofa - Open Fingerprint Architecture library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609121624.k8CGOqIL005890@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libofa - Open Fingerprint Architecture library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204954 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-09-12 12:24 EST ------- Spec URL: http://kde-redhat.unl.edu/apt/kde-redhat/SPECS/libofa.spec SRPM URL: http://kde-redhat.unl.edu/apt/kde-redhat/all/SRPMS.testing/libofa-0.9.3-6.src.rpm %changelog * Tue Sep 12 2006 Rex Dieter 0.9.3-7 - fix rpmdoc handling Serves me right for not actually testing the build first. (: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 12 16:27:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 12:27:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201674] Review Request: codeblocks In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609121627.k8CGReKY006135@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: codeblocks https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201674 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-09-12 12:27 EST ------- You should use "svn export" instead of "svn co" to generate your tarballs. The .svn directories are useless in this context. Deleting all of the .svn directories from the tarball gives me a clean compare except for one file: diff -ur a/codeblocks/src/plugins/contrib/help_plugin/help_plugin.cpp b/codeblocks/src/plugins/contrib/help_plugin/help_plugin.cpp --- a/codeblocks/src/plugins/contrib/help_plugin/help_plugin.cpp 2006-08-19 04:03:12.000000000 -0500 +++ b/codeblocks/src/plugins/contrib/help_plugin/help_plugin.cpp 2006-08-18 10:24:58.000000000 -0500 @@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ * Program URL : http://www.codeblocks.org * * $Id: help_plugin.cpp 2875 2006-08-18 15:24:58Z thomasdenk $ -* $Date: 2006-08-18 17:24:58 +0200 (P?, 18 srp 2006) $ +* $Date: 2006-08-18 10:24:58 -0500 (Fri, 18 Aug 2006) $ */ #include "help_plugin.h" I guess you'd have to set LANG and TZ when checking out as well. Or perhaps there's a flag to svn that could be used to suppress that kind of expansion. In any case, this isn't a big deal although when the time comes to check this package in, you should use a tarball generated with "svn export" to get rid of the needless ".svn" directories. The %configure line looks much simpler now. /usr/lib64/codeblocks is properly owned now. The desktop file looks to be properly installed. I recall that Rex is trying to get changes made to the desktop file policy with regards to using "--vendor fedora" but at this point I don't know what the fuss is about and what you have done is in accordance with the current packaging guidelines. So all of the issues I had are fixed; just be sure to get rid of those .svn directories in your tarball. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 12 16:45:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 12:45:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204954] Review Request: libofa - Open Fingerprint Architecture library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609121645.k8CGjK7s006936@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libofa - Open Fingerprint Architecture library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204954 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-09-12 12:45 EST ------- Make that SRPM URL: http://kde-redhat.unl.edu/apt/kde-redhat/all/SRPMS.testing/libofa-0.9.3-7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 12 16:46:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 12:46:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204954] Review Request: libofa - Open Fingerprint Architecture library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609121646.k8CGkFlH007009@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libofa - Open Fingerprint Architecture library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204954 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-09-12 12:46 EST ------- (In reply to comment #24) > Make that SRPM URL: > http://kde-redhat.unl.edu/apt/kde-redhat/all/SRPMS.testing/libofa-0.9.3-7.src.rpm Okay. Well, rpmlint complaint for src.rpm still exists. W: libofa mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs This can be fixed by using only spaces, not tabs. Consider to use only spaces or tabs. Aside for it, no problems is left. -------------------------------------------------------------- This package (libofa) is APPROVED by me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 12 17:00:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 13:00:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204954] Review Request: libofa - Open Fingerprint Architecture library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609121700.k8CH0ToO008003@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libofa - Open Fingerprint Architecture library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204954 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-09-12 13:00 EST ------- Thanks for the excellent review, importing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 12 18:14:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 14:14:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 181450] Review Request: clamav-exim - Clam AV support files for Exim In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609121814.k8CIECOr012957@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clamav-exim - Clam AV support files for Exim https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=181450 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |201449 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-09-12 14:14 EST ------- I'll go ahead and close this out. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 12 18:29:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 14:29:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204416] Review Request: libtelepathy - library to ease writing of telepathy clients In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609121829.k8CITpSF014515@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libtelepathy - library to ease writing of telepathy clients https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204416 ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at ameritech.net 2006-09-12 14:29 EST ------- Spec URL: http://piedmont.homelinux.org/fedora/telepathy/libtelepathy.spec SRPM URL: http://piedmont.homelinux.org/fedora/telepathy/libtelepathy-0.0.37-1.src.rpm * Tue Sep 12 2006 Brian Pepple - 0.0.37-1 - Update to 0.0.37. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 12 18:32:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 14:32:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205912] Review Request: Thunar - Thunar File Manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609121832.k8CIWVks014884@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Thunar - Thunar File Manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205912 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-09-12 14:32 EST ------- ok, added: BuildRequires: freetype-devel BuildRequires: pkgconfig BuildRequires: libxslt-devel BuildRequires: GConf2-devel BuildRequires: gtk-doc I'll take a look at not building the trash panel applet. Fixed %{_sysconfdir}/xdg/Thunar to be %dir %{_sysconfdir}/xdg/Thunar The beta/rc repo should now be updated to 4.4rc1 versions in both the fc5 and devel branches. I'll look at the xfce4-dev-tools, but I would expect them to fix things so thats not required for the final release, since that package is supposed to only be needed for developers. New files: Spec: http://www.scrye.com/~kevin/extras/Thunar/Thunar.spec Srpm: http://www.scrye.com/~kevin/extras/Thunar/Thunar-0.4.0-0.2.rc1.fc6.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 12 18:38:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 14:38:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205023] Review Request: filelight-1.0 - cool diskspace use browser for kde In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609121838.k8CIcIlw015453@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: filelight-1.0 - cool diskspace use browser for kde https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205023 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-09-12 14:38 EST ------- (Neal, FE_NEEDSPONSOR is indeed set as a blocker). FYI, here's the packaging guidelines update proposal I'll take to the committee: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/RexDieter/desktop_files -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 12 18:47:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 14:47:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200438] Review Request: tango-icon-theme - Icons from Tango Project In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609121847.k8CIlvTr016333@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tango-icon-theme - Icons from Tango Project https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200438 raven at pmail.pl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From raven at pmail.pl 2006-09-12 14:47 EST ------- FC-5 and devel created and built successfully, closing as NEXTRELEASE. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 12 19:15:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 15:15:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205955] Review Request: gdal - A translator library for raster geospatial data formats In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609121915.k8CJFd85019305@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gdal - A translator library for raster geospatial data formats https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205955 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-09-12 15:15 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=136100) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=136100&action=view) Patch to install binary, not corrupted shell script (In reply to comment #4) > (In reply to comment #3) > > > > One major issue I still have is with some programs in the *-bin package: > > > > $ gdalinfo > > mkdir: cannot create directory `/usr/bin/.libs': Permission denied > > /usr/bin/ld: cannot open output file /usr/bin/.libs/22786-lt-gdalinfo: No such > > file or directory > > collect2: ld returned 1 exit status > > > > I will check this after. > Well, all the bash shell scripts under /usr/bin in -bin rpm are corrupted. Check if this patch fixes this issue. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 12 19:17:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 15:17:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 195683] Review Request: smarteiffel - The GNU Eiffel Compiler and Libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609121917.k8CJHFkn019410@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: smarteiffel - The GNU Eiffel Compiler and Libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195683 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-09-12 15:16 EST ------- Ping? I'm happy to give this a full review if you'd care to cut a new package and decided what you'd like to do with the contrib directory. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 12 19:18:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 15:18:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205955] Review Request: gdal - A translator library for raster geospatial data formats In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609121918.k8CJIp9T019491@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gdal - A translator library for raster geospatial data formats https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205955 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-09-12 15:18 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=136101) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=136101&action=view) gdal.spec I used gdal.spec I used. I have not checked this in detail, so please check my spec, verify if the patch above work, and resubmit. Then I will review it again. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 12 19:31:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 15:31:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205955] Review Request: gdal - A translator library for raster geospatial data formats In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609121931.k8CJVJ6V020663@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gdal - A translator library for raster geospatial data formats https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205955 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #136100|0 |1 is obsolete| | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-09-12 15:31 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=136103) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=136103&action=view) Patch to install binary, not corrupted shell script (modified) Well, the previous patch is not sufficient. Please use this patch and verify the result. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 12 19:32:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 15:32:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205955] Review Request: gdal - A translator library for raster geospatial data formats In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609121932.k8CJWXLo020789@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gdal - A translator library for raster geospatial data formats https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205955 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #136101|0 |1 is obsolete| | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-09-12 15:32 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=136104) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=136104&action=view) gdal.spec I used (modified) And the spec file I used (again modified) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 12 19:44:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 15:44:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205620] Fedora Extras: Package Review Request: buildos In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609121944.k8CJiNgI021939@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Fedora Extras: Package Review Request: buildos https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205620 jkeating at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|jkeating at redhat.com |nobody at fedoraproject.org QAContact|extras-qa at fedoraproject.org |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 12 20:07:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 16:07:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 195683] Review Request: smarteiffel - The GNU Eiffel Compiler and Libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609122007.k8CK7ibD023434@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: smarteiffel - The GNU Eiffel Compiler and Libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195683 ------- Additional Comments From gemi at bluewin.ch 2006-09-12 16:07 EST ------- Sorry, I currently quite busy with the final stage of my PhD studies. But I will work on it, as soon as I find more time. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 12 20:21:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 16:21:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205912] Review Request: Thunar - Thunar File Manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609122021.k8CKLUs8024327@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Thunar - Thunar File Manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205912 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pertusus at free.fr ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-09-12 16:21 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > ok, added: > BuildRequires: freetype-devel > BuildRequires: pkgconfig > BuildRequires: libxslt-devel This seems wrong to me, since what is required is the xsltproc program, which is in libxslt. > BuildRequires: GConf2-devel > BuildRequires: gtk-doc > > I'll take a look at not building the trash panel applet. It is automatically not built with the xfce-panel in -devel, so it is allready not built, however it is in %files... > I'll look at the xfce4-dev-tools, but I would expect them to fix things so > thats not required for the final release, since that package is supposed to > only be needed for developers. It is not required at all for this release. However I consider it a good thing when all the packages required for developers are there, even they are not needed at all (as buildrequires or requires) in the normal cases. Indeed, it may be usefull in case somebody want to modify the tarball itself, regenerate configure file, do tests, regenerate documentation and so on. Not a blocker, just a suggestion. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 12 20:25:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 16:25:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190040] Review Request: hydrogen - Advanced drum machine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609122025.k8CKPmN4024512@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hydrogen - Advanced drum machine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190040 ------- Additional Comments From opensource at till.name 2006-09-12 16:25 EST ------- You should not convert the icon in your spec file. The different sizes are only needed if they are manually edited in the other sizes to look better. This simple resizing is done automatically by a window manager if needed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 12 20:25:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 16:25:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190029] Review Request: whysynth-dssi - DSSI software synthesizer plugin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609122025.k8CKPstW024538@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: whysynth-dssi - DSSI software synthesizer plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190029 ------- Additional Comments From opensource at till.name 2006-09-12 16:25 EST ------- You should not convert the icon in your spec file. The different sizes are only needed if they are manually edited in the other sizes to look better. This simple resizing is done automatically by a window manager if needed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 12 20:27:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 16:27:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190040] Review Request: hydrogen - Advanced drum machine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609122027.k8CKRcpf024663@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hydrogen - Advanced drum machine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190040 ------- Additional Comments From opensource at till.name 2006-09-12 16:27 EST ------- Please ignore my last comment it was addressed to another review request. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 12 20:30:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 16:30:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204343] Review Request: qcomicbook - a comic book viewing program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609122030.k8CKUPhw024822@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qcomicbook - a comic book viewing program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204343 ------- Additional Comments From scott at perturb.org 2006-09-12 16:30 EST ------- I applied for CVS extras. What's next? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 12 21:57:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 17:57:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192606] Review Request: yafc: yet another ftp client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609122157.k8CLvL2n030712@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: yafc: yet another ftp client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192606 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-09-12 17:57 EST ------- G?rard or Ralf: Are either of you going to do a formal review on this package? If not, I would be happy to step in and do so... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 12 23:28:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 19:28:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192606] Review Request: yafc: yet another ftp client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609122328.k8CNSRRh002345@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: yafc: yet another ftp client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192606 ------- Additional Comments From gemi at bluewin.ch 2006-09-12 19:28 EST ------- (In reply to comment #8) > G?rard or Ralf: Are either of you going to do a formal review on this package? > > If not, I would be happy to step in and do so... Yes, go on. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 13 01:20:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 21:20:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205300] Review Request: gtk-sharp - a set of mono bindings for gtk1.2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609130120.k8D1KSJY006326@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtk-sharp - a set of mono bindings for gtk1.2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205300 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-09-12 21:20 EST ------- Per the conversation on IRC, I'll go ahead and move this review forward... OK - Package name OK - Spec file matches base package name. OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines. OK - License (LGPL) OK - License field in spec matches OK - License file included in package OK - Spec in American English OK - Spec is legible. See below - Sources match upstream md5sum: Pending - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch. Pending - BuildRequires correct Pending - Package owns all the directories it creates. OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files. OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. OK - Package has a correct %clean section. OK - Spec has consistant macro usage. OK - Package is code or permissible content. OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime. OK - .pc files in -devel subpackage. OK - -devel package Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} Pending - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. Pending - No rpmlint output. SHOULD Items: OK - Should include License or ask upstream to include it. See below - Should build in mock. OK - Should have subpackages require base package with fully versioned depend. Issues: 1. I can't seem to find the source download for this version. http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=40240 has 1.0.8 as the latest stable version. Where can this source be found? 2. Might include AUTHORS and HACKING and README.generator files? 3. Still doesn't seem to build for me in mock/devel: Patch #0 (gtksharp-libdir.patch): + patch -p1 -b --suffix .libdir -s + autoreconf configure.in:50: error: possibly undefined macro: PKG_PATH If this token and others are legitimate, please use m4_pattern_allow. See the Autoconf documentation. autoreconf: /usr/bin/autoconf failed with exit status: 1 error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.14789 (%prep) Are you sure you have the most recent spec up (-7?) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 13 01:21:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 21:21:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206222] New: Review Request: manaworld-music - music for the manaworld game Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206222 Summary: Review Request: manaworld-music - music for the manaworld game Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: wart at kobold.org QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.kobold.org/~wart/fedora/manaworld-music.spec SRPM URL: http://www.kobold.org/~wart/fedora/manaworld-music-0.0.20-1.src.rpm Description: Upstream's music files for the manaworld game -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 13 02:12:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 22:12:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192606] Review Request: yafc: yet another ftp client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609130212.k8D2C0iL008317@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: yafc: yet another ftp client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192606 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |kevin at tummy.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-09-12 22:11 EST ------- OK - Package name OK - Spec file matches base package name. OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines. OK - License (GPL) OK - License field in spec matches OK - License file included in package OK - Spec in American English OK - Spec is legible. OK - Sources match upstream md5sum: 832d074183a36ee15b47553ed5962fce yafc-1.1.1.tar.bz2 832d074183a36ee15b47553ed5962fce yafc-1.1.1.tar.bz2.1 OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch. OK - BuildRequires correct OK - Package owns all the directories it creates. OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files. See below - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. OK - Package has a correct %clean section. OK - Spec has consistant macro usage. OK - Package is code or permissible content. OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime. OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. OK - No rpmlint output. SHOULD Items: OK - Should include License or ask upstream to include it. OK - Should build in mock. Issues: 1. You might change your default attributes from: %defattr(-, root, root) to %defattr(-, root, root,-) Aside from that I see no issues. Feel free to change issue #1 above when you check the package in. Pending that, this package is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 13 02:21:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 22:21:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205955] Review Request: gdal - A translator library for raster geospatial data formats In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609130221.k8D2LwUw009034@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gdal - A translator library for raster geospatial data formats https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205955 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #136104|application/octet-stream |text/plain mime type| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 13 03:16:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 23:16:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198245] Review Request: gnome-libs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609130316.k8D3GA4x012460@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-libs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198245 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |kevin at tummy.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-09-12 23:16 EST ------- OK - Package name OK - Spec file matches base package name. OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines. OK - License (LGPL) OK - License field in spec matches See below - License file included in package OK - Spec in American English OK - Spec is legible. OK - Sources match upstream md5sum: 6111e91b143a90afb30f7a8c1e6cbbd6 gnome-libs-1.4.2.tar.bz2 6111e91b143a90afb30f7a8c1e6cbbd6 gnome-libs-1.4.2.tar.bz2.1 see below OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch. OK - BuildRequires correct OK - Spec handles locales/find_lang OK - Spec has needed ldconfig in post and postun OK - Package owns all the directories it creates. OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files. OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. OK - Package has a correct %clean section. OK - Spec has consistant macro usage. OK - Package is code or permissible content. OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime. OK - Headers/static libs in -devel subpackage. OK - .so files in -devel subpackage. OK - -devel package Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. See below - No rpmlint output. SHOULD Items: See below - Should include License or ask upstream to include it. OK - Should build in mock. Issues: 1. You include COPYING as a %doc, but this package is released under the LGPL. Should change that to the COPYING.LIB file instead. 2. Are there any upstream/full links for the other source files? Source2: gnome-libs-pofiles.tar.gz Source3: db.1.85.tar.gz Source4: utf8-ta.po 3. I assume that this package won't work with db4, and needs the old db-1.85 thats included? 4. Is this needed, since extras doesn't ship on ia64? ## from db1 %ifnarch ia64 Conflicts: glibc-devel < 2.1.90 %endif 5. rpmlint has (on fc6/i386): W: gnome-libs conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/gnome/gtkrc W: gnome-libs conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/gnome/gtkrc.el W: gnome-libs conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/gnome/gtkrc.eo W: gnome-libs conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/gnome/gtkrc.he W: gnome-libs conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/gnome/gtkrc.hy W: gnome-libs conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/gnome/gtkrc.iso88592 W: gnome-libs conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/gnome/gtkrc.iso88595 W: gnome-libs conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/gnome/gtkrc.ja W: gnome-libs conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/gnome/ gtkrc.ka_GE.georgianacademy W: gnome-libs conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/gnome/gtkrc.ka_GE.georgianps W: gnome-libs conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/gnome/gtkrc.ko W: gnome-libs conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/gnome/gtkrc.ru W: gnome-libs conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/gnome/gtkrc.th W: gnome-libs conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/gnome/gtkrc.tr W: gnome-libs conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/gnome/gtkrc.uk W: gnome-libs conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/gnome/gtkrc.vi_VN.tcvn W: gnome-libs conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/gnome/gtkrc.vi_VN.viscii W: gnome-libs conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/gnome/gtkrc.zh_CN W: gnome-libs conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/gnome/gtkrc.zh_TW.Big5 W: gnome-libs conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/mime-magic W: gnome-libs conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/mime-magic.dat W: gnome-libs conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/paper.config W: gnome-libs conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/sound/events/gnome.soundlist W: gnome-libs conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/sound/events/gtk- events.soundlist Perhaps these should all be (noreplace)? E: gnome-libs non-standard-gid /usr/sbin/gnome-pty-helper utmp E: gnome-libs setgid-binary /usr/sbin/gnome-pty-helper utmp 02755 E: gnome-libs non-standard-executable-perm /usr/sbin/gnome-pty-helper 02755 E: gnome-libs-devel only-non-binary-in-usr-lib W: gnome-libs-devel no-documentation Can be ignored I think. on (fc6/x86_64): E: gnome-libs binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/gconfigger ['/usr/lib64'] E: gnome-libs binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/gnome-dump-metadata ['/usr/ lib64'] E: gnome-libs binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/gnome-name-service ['/usr/ lib64'] E: gnome-libs binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/loadshlib ['/usr/lib64'] E: gnome-libs binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/gnome_segv ['/usr/lib64'] E: gnome-libs binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/gnome-gen-mimedb ['/usr/ lib64'] E: gnome-libs binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/gnome-moz-remote ['/usr/ lib64'] E: gnome-libs binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/goad-browser ['/usr/lib64'] Is there some way to remove the rpath? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 13 04:04:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 00:04:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197732] Review Request: optipng - a PNG optimizer and converter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609130404.k8D44XQa015733@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: optipng - a PNG optimizer and converter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197732 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |kevin at tummy.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-09-13 00:04 EST ------- OK - Package name OK - Spec file matches base package name. OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines. OK - License (zlib/libpng) OK - License field in spec matches OK - License file included in package OK - Spec in American English OK - Spec is legible. OK - Sources match upstream md5sum: a6f3234a47464ecc1f455b52f0769492 optipng-0.5.3.tar.gz a6f3234a47464ecc1f455b52f0769492 optipng-0.5.3.tar.gz.1 OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch. OK - BuildRequires correct OK - Package owns all the directories it creates. OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files. OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. OK - Package has a correct %clean section. OK - Spec has consistant macro usage. OK - Package is code or permissible content. OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime. OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. See below - No rpmlint output. SHOULD Items: OK - Should include License or ask upstream to include it. - Should build in mock. Issues: 1. version 0.5.4 is out now. 2. You have 2 commented out lines: #BuildRequires: #Requires: Might just remove those? 3. rpmlint says: W: optipng invalid-license zlib/libpng W: optipng invalid-license zlib/libpng W: optipng-debuginfo invalid-license zlib/libpng This can be ignored (see bug 198616). E: optipng-debuginfo empty-debuginfo-package Not sure whats causing that. You are building with -g It would be good to fix however. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 13 04:06:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 00:06:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197732] Review Request: optipng - a PNG optimizer and converter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609130406.k8D46jgR015837@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: optipng - a PNG optimizer and converter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197732 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-09-13 00:06 EST ------- Oh, forgot to mention... in the 0.5.4. release they mention that they "Added support for builds based on the system-supplied libpng." So, perhaps you can switch to using the system libpng? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 13 06:16:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 02:16:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192606] Review Request: yafc: yet another ftp client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609130616.k8D6GLuZ021624@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: yafc: yet another ftp client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192606 ------- Additional Comments From lists at forevermore.net 2006-09-13 02:16 EST ------- Which license? The GPL is there already (document is called COPYING, which it is in many GPL programs). Package builds fine in mock in my system, too. Anyway, issue #1 is fixed, and I will add the package to extras soon. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 13 06:17:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 02:17:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206238] New: Review Request: qdbm - Quick Database Manager Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206238 Summary: Review Request: qdbm - Quick Database Manager Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: tagoh at redhat.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/tagoh/qdbm/qdbm.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/tagoh/qdbm/qdbm-1.8.70-1.src.rpm Description: QDBM is an embedded database library compatible with GDBM and NDBM. It features hash database and B+ tree database and is developed referring to GDBM for the purpose of the following three points: higher processing speed, smaller size of a database file, and simpler API. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 13 06:21:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 02:21:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192606] Review Request: yafc: yet another ftp client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609130621.k8D6LnSO021823@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: yafc: yet another ftp client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192606 lists at forevermore.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 13 06:51:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 02:51:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193531] Review Request: kicad - Electronic schematic diagrams and printed circuit board artwork In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609130651.k8D6pdoM022866@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kicad - Electronic schematic diagrams and printed circuit board artwork https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193531 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2006-09-13 02:51 EST ------- The kicad package does not work as it should be, so I'm reopening the bug. * on kicad open project /usr/share/kicad/demos/video/video.pro I have 2 files opened: video.brd and video.sch under this project video.pro, which is as it should be :) However on clicking on the 2nd button (from the left to the right) I have a messagebox saying "Library file not found" I clicked on OK "Library file not found" I clicked on OK! ...... another 4 libraries missing. $ls /usr/share/kicad/modules/ packages3d Definitely this modules are missing. Check out the new upstream release whether they have these or not. * $ rpm -q kicad kicad-2006.06.26-5.fc5 * Now on the third button,; "command file not found". $ whereis pcbnew pcbnew: Check these out and update to upstream new release. Post the SPEC file and SRPM again here, i'll test them before committing to cvs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 13 06:52:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 02:52:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193531] Review Request: kicad - Electronic schematic diagrams and printed circuit board artwork In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609130652.k8D6qQ7D022917@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kicad - Electronic schematic diagrams and printed circuit board artwork https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193531 cgoorah at yahoo.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |NEW Keywords| |Reopened Resolution|NEXTRELEASE | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 13 06:53:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 02:53:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193531] Review Request: kicad - Electronic schematic diagrams and printed circuit board artwork In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609130653.k8D6rLSQ022989@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kicad - Electronic schematic diagrams and printed circuit board artwork https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193531 cgoorah at yahoo.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163779 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 13 07:10:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 03:10:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201674] Review Request: codeblocks In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609130710.k8D7A7dY023621@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: codeblocks https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201674 ------- Additional Comments From dan at danny.cz 2006-09-13 03:09 EST ------- Thnaks for the review. The .svn directory (at least the top-level) is required by src/tools/autorevision utility which incorporates the revision number into the codeblocks binary (creates src/sdk/autorevision.h). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 13 09:09:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 05:09:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193531] Review Request: kicad - Electronic schematic diagrams and printed circuit board artwork In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609130909.k8D99lcs031886@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kicad - Electronic schematic diagrams and printed circuit board artwork https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193531 ------- Additional Comments From alain.portal at free.fr 2006-09-13 05:09 EST ------- Chitlesh, As somebody stole my work computer at the end of july, I can't contribute to Fedora Extras for the moment. I'll get probably a new computer next week and I need one week to rebuild my environment. So, probably no new release before at least two week. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 13 10:08:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 06:08:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203520] Review Request: evolution-brutus In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609131008.k8DA8JIb004030@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: evolution-brutus Alias: evolution-brutus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203520 ------- Additional Comments From colding at omesc.com 2006-09-13 06:08 EST ------- (In reply to comment #30) > -------------------------------------------------- > I cannot sponsor you because I am not a member of > sponsors. I can do only pre-review of this package. > -------------------------------------------------- > > * Well, another unowned directory is found: > /usr/include/brutusd-1.0/ OK, fixed. > * Well, "2.8" tag is actually related with evolution version. > configure says: > > GETTEXT_PACKAGE=evolution-brutus-${EVOLUTION_VERSION} > > and po/Makefile.in.in says: > > echo "installing $$lang.gmo as $$dir/$(GETTEXT_PACKAGE).mo" > > So, the line %{find_lang} %{name}-2.8 should be changed according > to the version of evolution. If this src.rpm is supposed to be > used both on FC6-devel and FC5, then the suffix of "2.8" must be > automatically changed. One way to do this is: > > -------------------------------------------------------- > for f in %{_bindir}/evolution-* ; do > evover=${f#%{_bindir}/evolution-} > done > > %{find_lang} %{name}-${evover} > --------------------------------------------------------- > With applying this, the version-specific conflict for evolution can be > removed. Well, I really did not intent this SRPM to be used on anything but FC6(-devel), as FC4/5 SRPMs are automatically generated by my build script, but your solution is so elegant and clever that I simply *must* use it. Thanks a lot! New files here: Spec URL: http://www.omesc.com/content/downloads/dist/Fedora%20Core%206/SPECS/evolution-brutus.spec SRPM URL: http://www.omesc.com/content/downloads/dist/Fedora%20Core%206/SRPMS/evolution-brutus-1.1.6-10.src.rpm Thanks, jules -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 13 10:41:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 06:41:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201006] Review Request: HelixPlayer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609131041.k8DAfHJI006101@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: HelixPlayer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201006 ------- Additional Comments From gauret at free.fr 2006-09-13 06:41 EST ------- Ping ? Amarok depends on HelixPlayer, so right now it's a broken dependency on FC6-beta. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 13 10:50:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 06:50:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201006] Review Request: HelixPlayer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609131050.k8DAom6C006823@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: HelixPlayer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201006 gauret at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |206214 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 13 12:05:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 08:05:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206238] Review Request: qdbm - Quick Database Manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609131205.k8DC5Bmv011175@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qdbm - Quick Database Manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206238 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |panemade at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-09-13 08:05 EST ------- - mock build for FC6 i386 is not sucessfull while processing qdbm package mock gave following messages. /usr/bin/strip: unable to copy file '/var/tmp/qdbm-1.8.70-root-mockbuild/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.8/i386-linux-thread-multi/auto/Depot/Depot.so' reason: Permission denied /usr/bin/strip: unable to copy file '/var/tmp/qdbm-1.8.70-root-mockbuild/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.8/i386-linux-thread-multi/auto/Curia/Curia.so' reason: Permission denied /usr/bin/strip: unable to copy file '/var/tmp/qdbm-1.8.70-root-mockbuild/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.8/i386-linux-thread-multi/auto/Villa/Villa.so' reason: Permission denied - rpmlint is also not silent Akira, I suggest you to mock build your package and see for rpmlint errors. There are huge number of rpmlint errors and warnigs from all your packages. I cannot post all of them. Correct rpmlint output to be silent and update your package. For more information about rpmlint errors use rpmlint -iv RPMname And check description below each error to solve it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 13 12:12:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 08:12:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206266] New: Review Request: transmission - lightweight GTK+ BitTorrent client Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206266 Summary: Review Request: transmission - lightweight GTK+ BitTorrent client Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: denis at poolshark.org QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.poolshark.org/src/transmission.spec SRPM URL: http://www.poolshark.org/src/transmission-0.6.1-1.src.rpm Description: Transmission is a free, lightweight BitTorrent client. It features a simple, intuitive interface on top on an efficient, cross-platform back-end. Notes from packager: - Transmission is primarily a MacOSX application but provides a nice simple GTK+ backend. - It uses a custom simplistic build system that requires a patch to make install things at the expected locations - configure needs a patch to fix an incorrect gtk+ version comparison (numerically 2.10 < 2.6 :-) ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 13 12:23:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 08:23:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206222] Review Request: manaworld-music - music for the manaworld game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609131223.k8DCNNBS011950@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: manaworld-music - music for the manaworld game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206222 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |panemade at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-09-13 08:23 EST ------- {Not Official Reviewer} packaging looks ok. + Mockbuild is successfull for i386 FC6 + rpmlint on binary rpm is silent + dist tag is present + Buildroot is correct + source URL is correct + BR is correct + License used is GPL + License file COPYING is included + MD5 sum on tarball is matching upstream tarball eec5e7d6c8ddb8938209815dbf5da812 tmwmusic-0.0.20.tar.gz + No duplicate files Not tested package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 13 12:30:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 08:30:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205955] Review Request: gdal - A translator library for raster geospatial data formats In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609131230.k8DCUwEx012278@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gdal - A translator library for raster geospatial data formats https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205955 ------- Additional Comments From che666 at gmail.com 2006-09-13 08:30 EST ------- * cfitsio support could be enabled (builds and is available in extras). * in my eyes libgeotiff should be compiled with external library (its currently under review). * pc raster support is currently compiled with internal library (should it stay like that?) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 13 12:36:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 08:36:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205075] Review Request: fwbackups - a user backup program, with support for automated backups and on-demand backups In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609131236.k8DCan42012567@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fwbackups - a user backup program, with support for automated backups and on-demand backups https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205075 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-09-13 08:36 EST ------- {Not Official Reviewer} packaging looks ok. + Mockbuild is successfull for i386 FC6 + rpmlint on binary rpm is silent + dist tag is present + Buildroot is correct - source URL is NOT correct wget http://www.diffingo.com/content/view/12/45/lang,en/fwbackups-1.42.tar.gz --18:03:48-- http://www.diffingo.com/content/view/12/45/lang,en/fwbackups-1.42.tar.gz Resolving www.diffingo.com... 69.90.92.10 Connecting to www.diffingo.com|69.90.92.10|:80... connected. HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 404 Not Found 18:03:49 ERROR 404: Not Found. + BR is correct + License used is GPL + License file COPYING is included + MD5 sum on tarball is matching upstream tarball 9dc696ddf62f26827715fecbb15d6134 fwbackups-1.42.tar.gz + No duplicate files Not tested package. However when i check http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Python i found first line in SPEC contains %{!?python_sitelib: %define python_sitelib %(%{__python} -c "from distutils.sysconfig import get_python_lib; print get_python_lib()")} whereas above wikipage suggests %{!?python_sitelib: %define python_sitelib %(%{__python} -c "from distutils.sysconfig import get_python_lib; print get_python_lib(1)")} -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 13 12:45:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 08:45:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204416] Review Request: libtelepathy - library to ease writing of telepathy clients In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609131245.k8DCjehg012991@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libtelepathy - library to ease writing of telepathy clients https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204416 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-09-13 08:44 EST ------- {Not Official Reviewer} packaging looks ok. + Mockbuild is successfull for i386 FC6 + rpmlint on binary rpm is silent + dist tag is present + Buildroot is correct + source URL is correct + BR is correct + License used is GPL + License file COPYING is included + devel package is handled correctly + MD5 sum on tarball is matching upstream tarball 98cd5963b02396a7698b064cf5097dcd libtelepathy-0.0.37.tar.gz + No duplicate files Not tested package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 13 12:59:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 08:59:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206266] Review Request: transmission - lightweight GTK+ BitTorrent client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609131259.k8DCxYge014216@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: transmission - lightweight GTK+ BitTorrent client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206266 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |panemade at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-09-13 08:59 EST ------- {Not Official Reviewer} packaging looks ok. + Mockbuild is successfull for i386 FC6 with some warnings + rpmlint on binary rpm is silent + dist tag is present + Buildroot is correct + source URL is correct + BR is correct + License used is MIT + License file LICENSE is included + desktop file is handled correctly + MD5 sum on tarball is matching upstream tarball 1156a88c77ab71782b9261881ea13811 Transmission-0.6.1.tar.gz + No duplicate files Application got installed correclty. Desktop icon is visible also. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 13 14:25:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 10:25:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205955] Review Request: gdal - A translator library for raster geospatial data formats In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609131425.k8DEPDb0020040@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gdal - A translator library for raster geospatial data formats https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205955 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-09-13 10:25 EST ------- Joost, please check my patch and spec file (in comment #7 and in comment #8), add some needed change you think, and re-sumbit spec and srpm. I will then re-check your spec. At least: %exclude %{_libdir}/*.la %exclude %{_libdir}/*.a %exclude %{_libdir}/python*/site-packages/*.a %exclude %{_libdir}/python*/site-packages/*.la Well, don't do these ways. Explicitly remove these files at %install stage. i.e. add rm -f %{buildroot}%{_libdir}/*.{a,la} rm -f %{buildroot}%{_libdir}/python*/site-packages/*.{a,la} to %install stage and don't use %exclude if it is possible. ( %exclude %{_bindir}/*.pyc %exclude %{_bindir}/*.pyo is needed anyway) And check my previous comment (comment #4 and comment #1). Also, I want to know your opinion against comment #9 (by Rudolf). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 13 15:10:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 11:10:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204343] Review Request: qcomicbook - a comic book viewing program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609131510.k8DFAcTe023432@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qcomicbook - a comic book viewing program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204343 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-09-13 11:10 EST ------- (In reply to comment #15) > I applied for CVS extras. What's next? Please follow : http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/Contributors -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 13 15:18:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 11:18:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201674] Review Request: codeblocks In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609131518.k8DFIIV5024117@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: codeblocks https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201674 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-09-13 11:18 EST ------- That would seem to be somewhat broken; svn export should give a buildable tree (and it seemed to work well for me but I suppose it didn't pick up the embedded version.) And it's kind of weird for some software to care about the VCS that contains it. What if I wanted to pull it into a git tree for local modification? In any case, if it actually needs that stuff then I suppose you have to include it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 13 15:20:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 11:20:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204343] Review Request: qcomicbook - a comic book viewing program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609131520.k8DFKoOj024375@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qcomicbook - a comic book viewing program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204343 ------- Additional Comments From scott at perturb.org 2006-09-13 11:20 EST ------- I applied for cvsextras (or so I thought). I tried to do it again today and I get an error: 'Add' action denied. You may need to become a member of the cla_done group first. I'm "in progress" in the cla_done group. I don't even know what that is. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 13 15:24:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 11:24:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192606] Review Request: yafc: yet another ftp client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609131524.k8DFOb9c024680@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: yafc: yet another ftp client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192606 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-09-13 11:24 EST ------- In reply to comment #11: Yeah, thats my checklist of items when looking at packages... the OK there means that they License was included and is ok. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 13 15:37:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 11:37:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193531] Review Request: kicad - Electronic schematic diagrams and printed circuit board artwork In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609131537.k8DFbu2D025937@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kicad - Electronic schematic diagrams and printed circuit board artwork https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193531 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-09-13 11:37 EST ------- > The kicad package does not work as it should be, so I'm reopening the bug. Why? This is the review for adding the package to extras. It has passed review and been added as far as I can tell... Now that its added it should have it's own bugzilla component to report bugs. Please close this bug again as NEXTRELEASE and file a new bug against kicad... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 13 15:39:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 11:39:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201674] Review Request: codeblocks In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609131539.k8DFdQYt026071@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: codeblocks https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201674 ------- Additional Comments From dan at danny.cz 2006-09-13 11:39 EST ------- I have just tested recompile without the .svn directories - it works. But I think I able to generate the header file directly from the spec file (both date and revision are there) and disable compiling and running the autorevision utility. I will create an updated version of SRPM. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 13 16:39:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 12:39:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 174021] Review Request: aplus-fsf - Advanced APL Interpreter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609131639.k8DGdIRT030736@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aplus-fsf - Advanced APL Interpreter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174021 Jochen at herr-schmitt.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From Jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2006-09-13 12:39 EST ------- Becouse there are no any complaints now I will close this bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 13 16:49:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 12:49:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200436] Review Request: gaim-gadugadu - Gadu-Gadu support in Gaim IM client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609131649.k8DGnWRd031363@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gaim-gadugadu - Gadu-Gadu support in Gaim IM client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200436 mr.ecik at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |mr.ecik at gmail.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mr.ecik at gmail.com 2006-09-13 12:49 EST ------- Okay, I'll review it: MUST items: * rpmlint output: W: gaim-gadugadu incoherent-version-in-changelog 2:2.0.0-0.8.beta3.1 2.0.0- 0.8.beta3 W: gaim-gadugadu no-documentation * package is named well * spec file name is good * package meets Packaging Guidelines * package is licensed with GPL license * License field matches the actual license * license is not included in %doc (see THINGS to do) * md5sums of sources are matching * spec file is legible and is written in American English * package successfully compile on x86_64 * build dependencies...? * no locales * package has good %post and %postun sections * not relocatable * package doesn't own any directories * no duplicates in %files * permissions are set properly * package has proper %clean section * package handles macros well * no need to -doc subpackage * no need to -devel subpackage * no .pc files * .la libtool archives excluded properly THINGS to do: * change version in changelog entry * add some documentation (at least COPYING) and mock builds fine. Just fix things mentioned above and I'll approve it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 13 16:53:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 12:53:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200436] Review Request: gaim-gadugadu - Gadu-Gadu support in Gaim IM client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609131653.k8DGrF6h031549@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gaim-gadugadu - Gadu-Gadu support in Gaim IM client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200436 ------- Additional Comments From mr.ecik at gmail.com 2006-09-13 12:53 EST ------- Don't care about the question mark after "build dependencies"... These dependencies are OK :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 13 17:18:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 13:18:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196669] Review Request: filesystem-i18n In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609131718.k8DHIYGJ000590@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: filesystem-i18n https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196669 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|notting at redhat.com |rdieter at math.unl.edu ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-09-13 13:18 EST ------- I can review this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 13 17:28:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 13:28:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196669] Review Request: filesystem-i18n In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609131728.k8DHSKsO001436@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: filesystem-i18n https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196669 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |notting at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-09-13 13:28 EST ------- Offhand: 1. Any particular reason you used Version: 2.3.7 or did you just borrow/inherit that from the main filesystem pkg? Otherwise, I'd suggest simply starting at Version: 1.0.0 for now. 2. You/we should decide upfront (ie, now) what exactly constitute major, minor, micro Version upgrades. Thoughts? (well, maybe it's not really that big of a deal). 3. %{_datadir}/locale is (still) unowned (ok, glibc-common owns it, but it should be owned here (too). You could greatly simplify the %files list by simply including: %{_datadir}/locale/ 4. kde uses a similar locale-like heirarchy under %{_docdir}/HTML. Would be nice to include that here too. Bill, this is (very) likely unable to make fc6. If that is the case, what do you think about getting this into Extras instead (at least until it can go into Core)? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 13 17:50:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 13:50:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202946] Review Request: aqsis - 3D Rendering system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609131750.k8DHonkk003955@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aqsis - 3D Rendering system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202946 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-09-13 13:50 EST ------- (In reply to comment #6) > Ok, so the package builds under mock for me, but rpmlint complains: > > [build at zeus aqsis]$ rpmlint aqsis-1.0.1-2.fc6.x86_64.rpm > W: aqsis incoherent-version-in-changelog 1.0.1-1 1.0.1-2.fc6 > W: aqsis objdump-failed objdump: > /tmp/aqsis-1.0.1-2.fc6.x86_64.rpm.18847/usr/lib64/aqsis/libbake2tif.so.0.0.0: > File format not recognized > E: aqsis binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/lib64/aqsis/libdisplay.so.0.0.0 > ['/usr/lib64'] > W: aqsis objdump-failed objdump: > /tmp/aqsis-1.0.1-2.fc6.x86_64.rpm.18847/usr/lib64/aqsis/libgif2tif.so.0.0.0: > File format not recognized > W: aqsis objdump-failed objdump: > /tmp/aqsis-1.0.1-2.fc6.x86_64.rpm.18847/usr/lib64/aqsis/libjpg2tif.so.0.0.0: > File format not recognized > W: aqsis objdump-failed objdump: > /tmp/aqsis-1.0.1-2.fc6.x86_64.rpm.18847/usr/lib64/aqsis/libpcx2tif.so.0.0.0: > File format not recognized > W: aqsis objdump-failed objdump: > /tmp/aqsis-1.0.1-2.fc6.x86_64.rpm.18847/usr/lib64/aqsis/libppm2tif.so.0.0.0: > File format not recognized > W: aqsis objdump-failed objdump: > /tmp/aqsis-1.0.1-2.fc6.x86_64.rpm.18847/usr/lib64/aqsis/libtga2tif.so.0.0.0: > File format not recognized > W: aqsis objdump-failed objdump: > /tmp/aqsis-1.0.1-2.fc6.x86_64.rpm.18847/usr/lib64/libslpp.so.0.0.0: File format > not recognized > E: aqsis shlib-with-non-pic-code /usr/lib64/libslpp.so.0.0.0 > W: aqsis devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/aqsis/shaders/bake.h > W: aqsis devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/aqsis/shaders/DPProctext.h > W: aqsis devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/aqsis/shaders/patterns.h > W: aqsis devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/aqsis/shaders/noises.h > > The headers sound like they should be there (comment #1); the first warning is > an easyfix (needs a changelog entry). The rpath error needs to be dealt with; > the objdump errors may be related to that I ran rpmlint against them on my fc5 > system (anyone know an easy way to install rpmlint in a mock chroot?) Just came across this issue myself. It's possible to do this as follows: 1. Copy the packages you're trying to run rpmlint against into the chroot's root: $ cp *.rpm /var/lib/mock/fedora-development-x86_64-core/root/ 2. Install rpmlint into the chroot: $ /usr/sbin/mock-helper yum --installroot /var/lib/mock/fedora-development-x86_64-core/root install rpmlint 3. Get a shell in the chroot: $ mock -r fedora-devel-x86_64-core.cfg shell 4. Run rpmlint: mock-chroot> rpmlint *.rpm 5. Exit from the chroot: mock-chroot> exit -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 13 17:52:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 13:52:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196669] Review Request: filesystem-i18n In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609131752.k8DHqPZ1004145@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: filesystem-i18n https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196669 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-09-13 13:52 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=136186) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=136186&action=view) list of locales used by kde(-i18n) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 13 17:52:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 13:52:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 181035] Review Request: luks-tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609131752.k8DHqrDi004212@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: luks-tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=181035 Jochen at herr-schmitt.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From Jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2006-09-13 13:52 EST ------- Good: + Local build works fine for FC-5. + Rpmlint has no complaints for binary rpm. + Rpmlint has no complaints for installed rpm. + Tar ball matched with upstream. + Binaries doesn't crash during startup. + Verbatin copy of license in %doc + License is GPLv2 + Mock build works fine for FC-5 Your package is APPOVED !!1 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 13 17:53:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 13:53:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196669] Review Request: filesystem-i18n In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609131753.k8DHrocj004386@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: filesystem-i18n https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196669 ------- Additional Comments From redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de 2006-09-13 13:53 EST ------- 1.: Just copied from main filesystem pkg, but 1.0.0 also would fit. 2.: Well...are there really major, minor or micro version upgrades? Adding a new language could be used for bumping micro, bumping minor only for bigger changes, e.g. adding new tree or maybe with every Fedora release, e.g. 1.6.x would be FC6. I wouldn't abuse major version for Fedora release, but maybe also another thought, e.g. 6.x.y for FC6. 3.: Agree, +1 4.: No, please don't do that. Not everybody installing the filesystem-i18n package is interested having a empty KDE directory i18n tree, when KDE isn't installed; which is case especially on servers. But if I have to accept that KDE i18n will get part of filesystem-i18n, then the i18n directories from %{_mandir} have to be added, too. When candidate for FE and until it receives FC, I would like to maintain it in FE - if possible... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 13 17:59:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 13:59:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201674] Review Request: codeblocks In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609131759.k8DHxGVj005182@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: codeblocks https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201674 ------- Additional Comments From dan at danny.cz 2006-09-13 13:59 EST ------- I agree that distributing .svn dirs is not optimal. So here is updated package Updated SRPM URL: http://fedora.danny.cz/codeblocks-1.0-0.9.20060909svn2965.src.rpm Updated spec URL: http://fedora.danny.cz/codeblocks.spec - added workaround that disables interaction with subversion during the build - the script for retrieving the sources sets LANG and TZ and is used to package the sources included in the SRPM Jason, please, check on your system whether it still builds. On my FC4 it is OK. Then I will use this package as starting point for Extras. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 13 18:07:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 14:07:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196669] Review Request: filesystem-i18n In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609131807.k8DI77EQ006454@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: filesystem-i18n https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196669 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Core |Fedora Extras Component|Package Review |Package Review ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-09-13 14:07 EST ------- > I would like to maintain it in FE - if possible... Sure, can do... I'll re-assign this to Fedora Extras then. (: 4. Re: KDE bits > Not everybody installing the filesystem-i18n package is interested having a > empty KDE directory i18n tree I don't think I buy that, the same argument can be made for the (mostly empty) %{_datadir}/locale/* bits. Besides, what (real) harm is there? > the i18n directories from %{_mandir} have to be added too. Not necessarily. afaict, most of those are owned by 'man' already. Though, I can see the case for including them here too. OK, I (think) I'm sold, include those too. (: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 13 18:08:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 14:08:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196669] Review Request: filesystem-i18n In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609131808.k8DI89sx006594@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: filesystem-i18n https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196669 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|notting at redhat.com | ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-09-13 14:08 EST ------- Now that this is moved to Fedora Extras, I'll un-CC notting so he doesn't get any more of this bugzilla spam. (: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 13 18:18:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 14:18:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198245] Review Request: gnome-libs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609131818.k8DIIXDX008471@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-libs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198245 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-09-13 14:18 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > Issues: > > 1. You include COPYING as a %doc, but this package is released under > the LGPL. Should change that to the COPYING.LIB file instead. Actually the libraries are LGPL but the support tools are GPL, so I've added COPYING.LIB rather than replace COPYING. > 2. Are there any upstream/full links for the other source files? > Source2: gnome-libs-pofiles.tar.gz > Source3: db.1.85.tar.gz > Source4: utf8-ta.po I've added a full URL for db.1.85.tar.gz; the others appear only to exist in Red Hat/Fedora CVS (probably created by the Red Hat maintainer at some point during the package's long spell in Core), though I've added some comments about where to find them. > 3. I assume that this package won't work with db4, and needs the > old db-1.85 thats included? Gnome specifically uses db version 1.85 so that there's a consistent database format across different platforms/distribution releases etc. So yes, db 1.85 is needed. > 4. Is this needed, since extras doesn't ship on ia64? > ## from db1 > %ifnarch ia64 > Conflicts: glibc-devel < 2.1.90 > %endif Well, it doesn't stop us adding sparc support where needed, so I don't think there's any harm in supporting ia64. However, since this is a package for FC6 onwards and the conflict is with a rather ancient glibc version, I removed it anyway. > 5. rpmlint has (on fc6/i386): > > W: gnome-libs conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/gnome/gtkrc > W: gnome-libs conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/gnome/gtkrc.el > W: gnome-libs conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/gnome/gtkrc.eo > W: gnome-libs conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/gnome/gtkrc.he > W: gnome-libs conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/gnome/gtkrc.hy > W: gnome-libs conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/gnome/gtkrc.iso88592 > W: gnome-libs conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/gnome/gtkrc.iso88595 > W: gnome-libs conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/gnome/gtkrc.ja > W: gnome-libs conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/gnome/ > gtkrc.ka_GE.georgianacademy > W: gnome-libs conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/gnome/gtkrc.ka_GE.georgianps > W: gnome-libs conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/gnome/gtkrc.ko > W: gnome-libs conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/gnome/gtkrc.ru > W: gnome-libs conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/gnome/gtkrc.th > W: gnome-libs conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/gnome/gtkrc.tr > W: gnome-libs conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/gnome/gtkrc.uk > W: gnome-libs conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/gnome/gtkrc.vi_VN.tcvn > W: gnome-libs conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/gnome/gtkrc.vi_VN.viscii > W: gnome-libs conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/gnome/gtkrc.zh_CN > W: gnome-libs conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/gnome/gtkrc.zh_TW.Big5 > W: gnome-libs conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/mime-magic > W: gnome-libs conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/mime-magic.dat > W: gnome-libs conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/paper.config > W: gnome-libs conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/sound/events/gnome.soundlist > W: gnome-libs conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/sound/events/gtk- > events.soundlist > > Perhaps these should all be (noreplace)? Debatable. gnome-libs has historically always been packaged without the noreplace for these files. I'll change it if you insist though. > E: gnome-libs non-standard-gid /usr/sbin/gnome-pty-helper utmp > E: gnome-libs setgid-binary /usr/sbin/gnome-pty-helper utmp 02755 > E: gnome-libs non-standard-executable-perm /usr/sbin/gnome-pty-helper 02755 > E: gnome-libs-devel only-non-binary-in-usr-lib > W: gnome-libs-devel no-documentation > > Can be ignored I think. Agreed. > on (fc6/x86_64): > > E: gnome-libs binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/gconfigger ['/usr/lib64'] > E: gnome-libs binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/gnome-dump-metadata ['/usr/ > lib64'] > E: gnome-libs binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/gnome-name-service ['/usr/ > lib64'] > E: gnome-libs binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/loadshlib ['/usr/lib64'] > E: gnome-libs binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/gnome_segv ['/usr/lib64'] > E: gnome-libs binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/gnome-gen-mimedb ['/usr/ > lib64'] > E: gnome-libs binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/gnome-moz-remote ['/usr/ > lib64'] > E: gnome-libs binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/goad-browser ['/usr/lib64'] > > Is there some way to remove the rpath? I used the FC6 libtool instead of the bundled one and that seems to have fixed it. Update packages: Spec URL: http://www.city-fan.org/~paul/extras/Gnome-1/gnome-libs.spec SRPM URL: http://www.city-fan.org/~paul/extras/Gnome-1/gnome-libs-1.4.2-3.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 13 18:22:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 14:22:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196669] Review Request: filesystem-i18n In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609131822.k8DIMptF009375@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: filesystem-i18n https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196669 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-09-13 14:22 EST ------- 3. Scratch original suggestion, forgot that these items should be marked using %lang, so we should do something like this instead: %dir %{_datadir}/locale/ ... %lang(foo) %{_datadir}/locale/foo/ %lang(bar) %{_datadir}/locale/bar/ ... (or using a scripted approach similar to to your original proposal) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 13 18:23:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 14:23:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205343] Review Request: cohoba - Cohoba is a GNOME interface for Telepathy. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609131823.k8DINZJH009617@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cohoba - Cohoba is a GNOME interface for Telepathy. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205343 bdpepple at ameritech.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: cohoba - |Review Request: cohoba - |Cohoba is a GNOME interface |Cohoba is a GNOME interface |for Telepathy. It aims to be|for Telepathy. |innovative and simple | ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at ameritech.net 2006-09-13 14:23 EST ------- I was looking at how other distros were packaging cohoba, it looks like most of them are depending upon telepathy-gabble, which is the sane thing to do for now. For example: http://packages.ubuntulinux.org/edgy/gnome/cohoba -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 13 18:36:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 14:36:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201674] Review Request: codeblocks In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609131836.k8DIakPX012623@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: codeblocks https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201674 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-09-13 14:36 EST ------- Yes, this builds fine and I think it's ready to check in. The codeblocks-getsvn script does elicit another rpmlint warning: W: codeblocks strange-permission codeblocks-getsvn 0755 but that is bogus as well. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 13 18:59:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 14:59:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201006] Review Request: HelixPlayer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609131859.k8DIxJ8t017297@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: HelixPlayer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201006 ------- Additional Comments From michael at knox.net.nz 2006-09-13 14:59 EST ------- Yes, I am still here. Work commitments are taking there toll at the moment. Will work on it over the weekend. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 13 19:07:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 15:07:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205955] Review Request: gdal - A translator library for raster geospatial data formats In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609131907.k8DJ77SN018958@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gdal - A translator library for raster geospatial data formats https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205955 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at soeterbroek.com 2006-09-13 15:07 EST ------- Spec URL: http://www.soeterbroek.com/linux/fedora/extras/gdal/gdal.spec SRPM URL: http://www.soeterbroek.com/linux/fedora/extras/gdal/gdal-1.3.2-3.fc6.src.rpm * Wed Sep 13 2006 Joost Soeterbroek 1.3.2-3 - enable cfitsio support, add cfitsio-devel BuildRequires - remove unwated files in %%install phase (rather than exclude in %%files) * Tue Sep 12 2006 Mamoru Tasaka 1.3.2-2.3 - Fix corrupted shell scripts problem more. * Tue Sep 12 2006 Mamoru Tasaka 1.3.2-2.2 - Fix BuildRequires, encoding, end-of-line encoding. - Install binary in -bin rpm, not corrupted shell scripts. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 13 19:08:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 15:08:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205955] Review Request: gdal - A translator library for raster geospatial data formats In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609131908.k8DJ8sOX019449@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gdal - A translator library for raster geospatial data formats https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205955 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at soeterbroek.com 2006-09-13 15:08 EST ------- (In reply to comment #9) > * cfitsio support could be enabled (builds and is available in extras). done in 1.3.2-3 > * in my eyes libgeotiff should be compiled with external library (its currently > under review). I have no idea/preference either way > * pc raster support is currently compiled with internal library (should it stay > like that?) I have no idea/preference either way -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 13 19:51:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 15:51:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205955] Review Request: gdal - A translator library for raster geospatial data formats In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609131951.k8DJpIPW027277@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gdal - A translator library for raster geospatial data formats https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205955 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-09-13 15:51 EST ------- (In reply to comment #12) > (In reply to comment #9) > I have no idea/preference either way It is always very preferable to have external tools, it is very hard to fix bugs, and especially security bugs when internal libraries are used. There are exception, when the internal library isn't really an independent project, and when the internal library is patched. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 13 21:00:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 17:00:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201674] Review Request: codeblocks In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609132100.k8DL06n4032450@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: codeblocks https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201674 dan at danny.cz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From dan at danny.cz 2006-09-13 16:59 EST ------- I saw the warning too. imported and built, FC-5 branch requested -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 13 21:41:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 17:41:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205955] Review Request: gdal - A translator library for raster geospatial data formats In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609132141.k8DLf43D002693@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gdal - A translator library for raster geospatial data formats https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205955 ------- Additional Comments From che666 at gmail.com 2006-09-13 17:41 EST ------- well if the external library is completly forked alright... otherwise in my eyes those patches should rather be brought into the upstream library. just my opinion. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 13 21:47:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 17:47:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205075] Review Request: fwbackups - a user backup program, with support for automated backups and on-demand backups In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609132147.k8DLlDPj003029@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fwbackups - a user backup program, with support for automated backups and on-demand backups https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205075 ------- Additional Comments From s.adam at diffingo.com 2006-09-13 17:47 EST ------- True, but because it's building for noarch and it's just GTK / Python code - wouldn't getting architecture-specific paths be useless? Alacarte, for example, also builds for noarch and uses the line without the (1). Anyways, I've published an updated .spec with a new SRPM: Spec URL: http://www.diffingo.com/downloads/FWBackups/fwbackups.spec SRPM URL: http://www.diffingo.com/downloads/FWBackups/fwbackups-1.42-4.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 13 22:04:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 18:04:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 181035] Review Request: luks-tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609132204.k8DM445d004154@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: luks-tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=181035 redhat at flyn.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 13 23:47:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 19:47:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206222] Review Request: manaworld-music - music for the manaworld game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609132347.k8DNlGES009002@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: manaworld-music - music for the manaworld game Alias: manaworld-music https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206222 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |chris.stone at gmail.com Alias| |manaworld-music -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 14 00:04:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 20:04:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206222] Review Request: manaworld-music - music for the manaworld game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609140004.k8E04IaW009634@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: manaworld-music - music for the manaworld game Alias: manaworld-music https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206222 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |206383 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 14 00:22:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 20:22:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205912] Review Request: Thunar - Thunar File Manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609140022.k8E0M7Dc010179@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Thunar - Thunar File Manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205912 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-09-13 20:22 EST ------- >> BuildRequires: libxslt-devel > >This seems wrong to me, since what is required is the xsltproc >program, which is in libxslt. Oops. You are right. I will fix that. Only libxslt should be required there. >> I'll take a look at not building the trash panel applet. > >It is automatically not built with the xfce-panel in -devel, >so it is allready not built, however it is in %files... Ah, I see the issue now. What do you suggest? This package is needed for the core Xfce 4.4 because xfdesktop needs to link to it to handle vfs/desktop issues. I guess I can disable the trash until it's approved? Or leave it in and see if any reviewers can build against the beta/rc1 repo? I'll see on xfce4-dev-tools... in any case I don't think that should hold up this review... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 14 01:31:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 21:31:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198245] Review Request: gnome-libs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609140131.k8E1Vchj012804@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-libs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198245 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-09-13 21:31 EST ------- all good on 1-4. (db1 source md5sum matches upstream) On item 5: >Debatable. gnome-libs has historically always been packaged without the >noreplace for these files. I'll change it if you insist though. I don't think thats a blocker... this package is unlikely to get much in the way of updates anyhow. The rpath issue looks to be all fixed up. I see no further blockers, so this package is APPROVED. Don't forget to close this package with NEXTRELEASE once it's been imported and built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 14 01:54:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 21:54:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189195] Review Request: horde - php application framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609140154.k8E1sQZn013769@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: horde - php application framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189195 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at theholbrooks.org 2006-09-13 21:54 EST ------- Spec URL: http://theholbrooks.org/RPMS/horde.spec SRPM URL: http://theholbrooks.org/RPMS/horde-3.1.3-4.src.rpm Okay I've figured out how to use %find_lang... and it seems to work exactly like it's supposed to. All the .mo files end up in the proper location in /usr/share/locale/ What are you unsure about php_database? That it's a valid requirement or that it is needed? I assure you it's valid (at least in Core packages), just run 'yum provides php_database' and you'll see php-mysql, php-odbc, and php-pgsql. Since Horde supports all 3 of these DB backends (and many more), I'll settle for anything that provides php_database. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 14 04:15:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 00:15:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206395] New: Review Request: picocom - Minimal serial communications program Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206395 Summary: Review Request: picocom - Minimal serial communications program Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jafo-redhat at tummy.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: ftp://ftp.tummy.com/pub/tummy/RPMS/SRPMS/picocom.spec SRPM URL: ftp://ftp.tummy.com/pub/tummy/RPMS/SRPMS/picocom-1.4-1.src.rpm Description: As its name suggests, [picocom] is a minimal dumb-terminal emulation program. It is, in principle, very much like minicom, only it's "pico" instead of "mini"! It was designed to serve as a simple, manual, modem configuration, testing, and debugging tool. It has also served (quite well) as a low-tech "terminal-window" to allow operator intervention in PPP connection scripts (something like the ms-windows "open terminal window before / after dialing" feature). It could also prove useful in many other similar tasks. It is ideal for embedded systems since its memory footprint is minimal (less than 20K, when stripped). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 14 04:33:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 00:33:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206398] New: Review Request: php-pecl-Fileinfo - libmagic bindings Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206398 Summary: Review Request: php-pecl-Fileinfo - libmagic bindings Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fedora at theholbrooks.org QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://theholbrooks.org/RPMS/php-pecl-Fileinfo.spec SRPM URL: http://theholbrooks.org/RPMS/php-pecl-Fileinfo-1.0.3-1.src.rpm Description: This extension allows retrieval of information regarding vast majority of file. This information may include dimensions, quality, length etc... Additionally it can also be used to retrieve the mime type for a particular file and for text files proper language encoding. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 14 04:39:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 00:39:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202946] Review Request: aqsis - 3D Rendering system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609140439.k8E4d167023935@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aqsis - 3D Rendering system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202946 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-09-14 00:38 EST ------- Nifty :) mock-chroot> rpmlint *.rpm W: aqsis incoherent-version-in-changelog 1.0.1-1 1.0.1-2.fc6 E: aqsis binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/lib64/aqsis/libdisplay.so.0.0.0 ['/usr/lib64'] W: aqsis devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/aqsis/shaders/bake.h W: aqsis devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/aqsis/shaders/DPProctext.h W: aqsis devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/aqsis/shaders/patterns.h W: aqsis devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/aqsis/shaders/noises.h First one is easy enough, last four are wrong, given the comments above. The second one seems to be fairly standard for non-fedora libtools; and the wiki suggests that it's not cause for alarm. Now, installing the aqsis in the chroot and running rpmlint against it returns those additional errors.... W: aqsis undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libshaderexecenv.so.0.0.0 _ZN5Aqsis9gColBlackE W: aqsis undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libshaderexecenv.so.0.0.0 _ZTVN5Aqsis13CqSplineCubicE W: aqsis undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libshaderexecenv.so.0.0.0 _ZN5Aqsis11gPowerBasisE W: aqsis undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libshaderexecenv.so.0.0.0 _ZN5Aqsis13gHermiteBasisE W: aqsis undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libshaderexecenv.so.0.0.0 _ZN5Aqsis16gCatmullRomBasisE W: aqsis undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libshaderexecenv.so.0.0.0 _ZN5Aqsis13gBSplineBasisE W: aqsis undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libshaderexecenv.so.0.0.0 _ZN5Aqsis12gBezierBasisE W: aqsis undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libshaderexecenv.so.0.0.0 _ZNK5Aqsis7CqColor8rgbtohsvEv W: aqsis undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libshaderexecenv.so.0.0.0 _ZNK5Aqsis8CqString16TranslateEscapesEv W: aqsis undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libshaderexecenv.so.0.0.0 _ZNK5Aqsis7CqColor8XYZtorgbEv W: aqsis undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libshaderexecenv.so.0.0.0 _ZN5Aqsis8CqMatrixC1EPf ...and on, and on. For completeness' sake, I'll attach the complete log... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 14 04:40:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 00:40:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202946] Review Request: aqsis - 3D Rendering system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609140440.k8E4eZAu023964@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aqsis - 3D Rendering system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202946 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-09-14 00:40 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=136231) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=136231&action=view) rpmlint errors from -2 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 14 04:41:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 00:41:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202946] Review Request: aqsis - 3D Rendering system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609140441.k8E4flbi024008@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aqsis - 3D Rendering system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202946 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #136231|application/octet-stream |text/plain mime type| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 14 04:44:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 00:44:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204140] Review Request: libmtp - MTP client library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609140444.k8E4ixg3024121@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libmtp - MTP client library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204140 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |panemade at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-09-14 00:44 EST ------- {Not Official Reviewer} packaging looks ok. + Mockbuild is successfull for i386 FC6 + rpmlint on binary rpm is silent - rpmlint in SRPM is NOT silent rpmlint -iv ../SRPMS/libmtp-0.0.15-1.src.rpm I: libmtp checking W: libmtp mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs The specfile mixes use of spaces and tabs for indentation, which is a cosmetic annoyance. Use either spaces or tabs for indentation, not both. + dist tag is present + Buildroot is correct + source URL is correct + BR is correct + License used is LGPL + License file COPYING is included + devel package is handled correctly + MD5 sum on tarball is matching upstream tarball 5d22b16cb7e6a117cdf489669821df09 libmtp-0.0.15.tar.gz + No duplicate files -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 14 05:08:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 01:08:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205032] Review Request: perl-Test-AutoBuild - a framework for continuous, unatttended software builds In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609140508.k8E58bjG025256@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-AutoBuild - a framework for continuous, unatttended software builds https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205032 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-09-14 01:08 EST ------- perl-Test-AutoBuild still needs to own the directory %{perl_vendorlib}/Test. Aside from that, looks good! :) APPROVED, on the condition %dir %{perl_vendorlib}/Test is added to the main package's %files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 14 05:22:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 01:22:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197740] Review Request: dircproxy - IRC proxy server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609140522.k8E5MHM8026082@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dircproxy - IRC proxy server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197740 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-09-14 01:22 EST ------- rpmlint, as it is wont to do, bestows upon us two errors: E: dircproxy executable-marked-as-config-file /etc/sysconfig/dircproxy E: dircproxy script-without-shellbang /etc/sysconfig/dircproxy A chmod -x /etc/sysconfig/dircproxy should do the trick. Aside from that, it works and looks good to me! APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 14 05:43:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 01:43:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197740] Review Request: dircproxy - IRC proxy server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609140543.k8E5hQGP027321@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dircproxy - IRC proxy server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197740 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-09-14 01:43 EST ------- Erm, in full that should have read "APPROVED, provided that the above is addressed." -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 14 05:56:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 01:56:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206238] Review Request: qdbm - Quick Database Manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609140556.k8E5uwBC028402@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qdbm - Quick Database Manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206238 ------- Additional Comments From tagoh at redhat.com 2006-09-14 01:56 EST ------- the build itself is no problem for me on even mock. I'll fix the rpmlint things though. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 14 06:29:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 02:29:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206238] Review Request: qdbm - Quick Database Manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609140629.k8E6TiGe029901@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qdbm - Quick Database Manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206238 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-09-14 02:29 EST ------- I think that is more important first to fix rpmlint errors and warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 14 07:27:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 03:27:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198245] Review Request: gnome-libs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609140727.k8E7RrIf000764@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-libs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198245 paul at city-fan.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-09-14 03:27 EST ------- 17302 (gnome-libs): Build on target fedora-development-extras succeeded. Build logs may be found at http://buildsys.fedoraproject.org/logs/fedora-development-extras/17302-gnome-libs-1.4.2-3.fc6/ owners.list updated. Thanks for the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 14 07:28:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 03:28:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198244] Review Request: libglade In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609140728.k8E7SEjv000791@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libglade https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198244 Bug 198244 depends on bug 198245, which changed state. Bug 198245 Summary: Review Request: gnome-libs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198245 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 14 07:53:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 03:53:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202946] Review Request: aqsis - 3D Rendering system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609140753.k8E7rbcp002628@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aqsis - 3D Rendering system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202946 ------- Additional Comments From denis at poolshark.org 2006-09-14 03:53 EST ------- Yes, I was able to get access to a x86_64 system and reproduce. Those are all very tough warnings to get rid off. The undefined-non-weak-symbol errors are related to circular dependencies. I asked on the list, but got little insights : http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2006-September/msg00173.html Essentially this is due to the poor organization of aqsis source code, and has all since been fixed in CVS. The /usr/lib64 rpath error is caused by fltk-config (bug 199657). Now none of these warnings/errors are preventing aqsis from working fine (try run it on ribfiles/vase.rib from the tarball, looks nice). So the choice seems to be 1) either package the stable 1.0 release and live with the oddities of the build system, the undefined symbols mean a (very slight) slower launch time. 2) package stable 1.0 with all sorts of patches to move code around and get rid of the warnings. 3) package a CVS snapshot that has a smoother build but might have all sorts of other problem, it not being a stable release... I'll veto point 2 right away :-) Debian does 3. I'm hapy with 1 or 3. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 14 09:28:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 05:28:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205912] Review Request: Thunar - Thunar File Manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609140928.k8E9SxL8009558@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Thunar - Thunar File Manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205912 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-09-14 05:28 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > Ah, I see the issue now. What do you suggest? This package is needed for the > core Xfce 4.4 because xfdesktop needs to link to it to handle vfs/desktop > issues. I guess I can disable the trash until it's approved? Are you sure? The files mising are usr/libexec/xfce4/panel-plugins/thunar-tpa and /usr/share/xfce4/panel-plugins/thunar-tpa.desktop Nothing can be linked against those files? Anyway I think that the right thing to do for now is to remove the tpa entries not found from %files. > Or leave it in and see if any reviewers can build against the beta/rc1 repo? I'll try that (if you've updated exo in the beta repo ;-) > I'll see on xfce4-dev-tools... in any case I don't think that should hold up > this review... It doesn't, it is just something to take care in the long term. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 14 09:45:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 05:45:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204975] Review Request: vigra - Generic Programming for Computer Vision In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609140945.k8E9jB8a011240@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vigra - Generic Programming for Computer Vision https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204975 bruno at postle.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 14 09:47:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 05:47:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205912] Review Request: Thunar - Thunar File Manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609140947.k8E9liIw011484@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Thunar - Thunar File Manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205912 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-09-14 05:47 EST ------- An unowned directories: %{_datadir}/Thunar/ The files in %{_datadir}/doc/Thunar/ should better be directly in %docs If you want to keep them in %{_datadir}/doc/Thunar/ they should be flagged as %doc. (the %{_datadir}/doc/Thunar/html directory is right as is, it should not be in %doc, as it is used at runtime). Not a blocker, but a suggestion, it seems to me that the man page are better with wildcards, such that they are picked even if not gzipped or bzip2ed..., so I propose: %{_mandir}/man1/Thunar.1* -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 14 09:56:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 05:56:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205912] Review Request: Thunar - Thunar File Manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609140956.k8E9uQcN012391@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Thunar - Thunar File Manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205912 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-09-14 05:56 EST ------- Also, I think it could be nice to have the examples packaged in -devel. For that I propose the following in %install: make -C examples distclean And the devel has a %doc: %doc examples -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 14 10:10:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 06:10:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192418] Review Request: xbae - Xbae widget set In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609141010.k8EAAA8r013607@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xbae - Xbae widget set https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192418 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-09-14 06:10 EST ------- Built in devel, added to owners. Do you want a branch for FC5 for grace? Otherwise I don't think it is necessary to have a FC5 branch, since there hasn't been xbae since FC1, without anybody complaining... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 14 10:43:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 06:43:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206395] Review Request: picocom - Minimal serial communications program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609141043.k8EAh473015658@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: picocom - Minimal serial communications program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206395 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |panemade at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-09-14 06:43 EST ------- {Not Official Reviewer} packaging looks ok. + Mockbuild is successfull for i386 FC6 + rpmlint on binary rpm is silent - dist tag is NOT present + Buildroot is correct + source URL is correct + License used is GPL + License file LICENSE.txt is included + MD5 sum on tarball is matching upstream tarball 08fcc5f6bb9e7676a2569386d5ea9f70 picocom-1.4.tar.gz + No duplicate files Not tested package. You need to use macros change /usr/bin/picocom to %{_bindir}/picocom -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 14 10:58:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 06:58:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206395] Review Request: picocom - Minimal serial communications program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609141058.k8EAwPvq016783@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: picocom - Minimal serial communications program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206395 denis at poolshark.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |denis at poolshark.org OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 14 11:15:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 07:15:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192418] Review Request: xbae - Xbae widget set In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609141115.k8EBF3jE018075@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xbae - Xbae widget set https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192418 ------- Additional Comments From jamatos at fc.up.pt 2006-09-14 07:15 EST ------- Please do. I would like, as far as possible, to maintain the same spec for different version. Thank you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 14 11:25:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 07:25:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206395] Review Request: picocom - Minimal serial communications program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609141125.k8EBPuHZ018907@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: picocom - Minimal serial communications program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206395 ------- Additional Comments From denis at poolshark.org 2006-09-14 07:25 EST ------- Looks good! Must fix: - debug package is broken. Just remove the strip command from the spec and let RPM handle it automatically. - RPM_OPT_FLAGS and compiler string are not honored. For example, just add 'CC=%{__cc} CFLAGS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS" to the make command. Also add '%{_smp_mflags}' to make line. - in %files section, use %{_bindir} instead of /usr/bin/ - don't include empty TODO file. Nice to have: - use install instead of cp, to make sure files get correct permissions -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 14 11:27:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 07:27:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192441] Review Request: gset-compiz In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609141127.k8EBRCFq019146@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gset-compiz https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192441 ------- Additional Comments From alcapcom at gmail.com 2006-09-14 07:27 EST ------- gset-compiz is not up to date any more (cf: http://www.compiz.net/topic-4218-removing-gset-compiz) IMHO, this bug may be closed. Regards, -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 14 12:26:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 08:26:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205955] Review Request: gdal - A translator library for raster geospatial data formats In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609141226.k8ECQLcO023822@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gdal - A translator library for raster geospatial data formats https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205955 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at soeterbroek.com 2006-09-14 08:26 EST ------- (In reply to comment #14) > well if the external library is completly forked alright... otherwise in my > eyes those patches should rather be brought into the upstream library. just my > opinion. I'll leave it as it is for the time being.. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 14 12:28:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 08:28:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200436] Review Request: gaim-gadugadu - Gadu-Gadu support in Gaim IM client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609141228.k8ECS9Zg023963@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gaim-gadugadu - Gadu-Gadu support in Gaim IM client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200436 ------- Additional Comments From raven at pmail.pl 2006-09-14 08:28 EST ------- Fixed: Spec URL: http://pmail.pl/~raven/gaim-gadugadu.spec SRPM URL: http://pmail.pl/~raven/gaim-gadgadu-2.0.0-0.11.beta3.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 14 12:51:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 08:51:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205955] Review Request: gdal - A translator library for raster geospatial data formats In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609141251.k8ECpbTq025441@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gdal - A translator library for raster geospatial data formats https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205955 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-09-14 08:51 EST ------- (In reply to comment #13 and comment #14) Well, generally I agree with your comments. Joost, generally you must consider using external libraries when it is available (mainly for security reasons, see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-17396a3b06ec849a7c0c6fc3243673b17e5fed90 ). However, 1. both libcsf (pcraster) and libgeotiff are not available in FC/FE. So this is NOT a blocker. 2. Apparantly the internal pcraster library seems newer than the one available (and some many modifications are made on internal libraries) 3. When libgeotiff is available on FE, you should consider using external libgeotiff libraries. It seems that the codes included in this package and libgeotiff project package are actually SAME. However, currently this is not a blocker. So, anyway I won't make extenal/internal issue block this bug. Well, again I will check this package (in the comment #11) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 14 12:56:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 08:56:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205955] Review Request: gdal - A translator library for raster geospatial data formats In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609141256.k8ECuwvl026208@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gdal - A translator library for raster geospatial data formats https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205955 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-09-14 08:56 EST ------- Before checking comment #11: Well, build log says: LIBTOOL support: yes LIBZ support: external GRASS support: no CFITSIO support: external PCRaster support: internal NETCDF support: yes LIBPNG support: external LIBTIFF support: external LIBGEOTIFF support: internal LIBJPEG support: external LIBGIF support: external OGDI support: no HDF4 support: no HDF5 support: yes KAKADU support: no JASPER support: no ECW support: no MrSID support: no POSTGRESQL support: yes MySQL support: yes XERCES support: no ODBC support: yes OCI support: no SDE support: no DODS support: no SQLite support: yes DWGdirect support no PANORAMA GIS support: no GEOS support: yes Statically link PROJ.4: no Traditional Python: yes NG SWIG Bindings: enable OGR building: yes ... It seems that jasper-devel-1.701.0 seems available on extras. I quite don't know about this package, however, if you want consider to support jasper support. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 14 13:29:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 09:29:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205955] Review Request: gdal - A translator library for raster geospatial data formats In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609141329.k8EDTgeF028449@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gdal - A translator library for raster geospatial data formats https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205955 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-09-14 09:29 EST ------- (In reply to comment #17) > Before checking comment #11: > > Well, build log says: > > HDF4 support: no hdf4 is in extras (hdf/hdf-devel). > DODS support: no DODS is also in extras, more precisely, opendap is there, which is what replace DODS. It is possible that gdal looks for older versions (as a side note, I took some code from gdal m4 macros to do a detection of old dods version in a macro for detection of dods/dap, it is in upstream libdap...). Packages are libdap/libdap-devel for the C++ interface or libnc-dap/libnc-dap-devel for the nectdf dods enabled interface. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 14 13:42:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 09:42:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205955] Review Request: gdal - A translator library for raster geospatial data formats In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609141342.k8EDg568029353@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gdal - A translator library for raster geospatial data formats https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205955 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-09-14 09:42 EST ------- (In reply to comment #18) > > HDF4 support: no > > hdf4 is in extras (hdf/hdf-devel). Strange. In spec file (in comment #11), it says: BuildRequires: hdf-devel %configure \ --with-hdf4=yes \ So I think that Joost want to support JDF4 support. Well, Joost, can you check what is happening? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 14 13:46:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 09:46:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205955] Review Request: gdal - A translator library for raster geospatial data formats In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609141346.k8EDkiBN029685@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gdal - A translator library for raster geospatial data formats https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205955 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-09-14 09:46 EST ------- (In reply to comment #16) > 1. both libcsf (pcraster) and libgeotiff are not available in FC/FE. So this > is NOT a blocker. libgeotiff is blocked by a legal issue, so it is something that should be looked at carefully... Is there the same issue for the internal geotiff of gdal? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 14 14:19:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 10:19:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205955] Review Request: gdal - A translator library for raster geospatial data formats In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609141419.k8EEJuBI032563@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gdal - A translator library for raster geospatial data formats https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205955 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-09-14 10:19 EST ------- The problem with libgeotiff seems to be the license on the data distributed as part of the package. Is that data included here? If not, there shouldn't be a problem, but then there shouldn't be a problem with getting just the library portion of libgeotiff in either. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 14 14:48:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 10:48:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205073] Review Request: MudMagic Mud Client - Onlnie Text Game Client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609141448.k8EEmFHP002653@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: MudMagic Mud Client - Onlnie Text Game Client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205073 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|WORKSFORME |NOTABUG OtherBugsDependingO|163778, 177841 |201449 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-09-14 10:48 EST ------- Why is this closed but still blocking both FE-REVIEW and FE-NEEDSPONSOR? It looks like this should block FE-DEADREVIEW instead; I'll make the change. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 14 14:50:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 10:50:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193106] Review Request: gtkmozembedmm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609141450.k8EEoepS002874@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtkmozembedmm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193106 ------- Additional Comments From karlthered at gmail.com 2006-09-14 10:50 EST ------- * updated spec: http://darkenphoenix.free.fr/RPMS/RPMS/Extras/SPECS/gtkmozembedmm.spec * script to build the tarball from cvs: http://darkenphoenix.free.fr/RPMS/RPMS/Extras/SPECS/gtkmozembedmm-cvs.sh * updated SRPM: http://darkenphoenix.free.fr/RPMS/RPMS/Extras/SRPMS/gtkmozembedmm-1.4.2.cvs20060817-4.fc5.src.rpm 1. Well, I made a little script that download a cvs snapshot and compress it in a tarball. I'm not sure why, but md5sum between 2 snapshots are always different though diff -Naur between 2 directories shows no difference. 2. done 3. looks like m4 macros are mostly located in /usr/include, so I put them there. 4. Since i automated the generation of the tarball, I made minor changes like enabling maintainer mode in %configure, this is necessary to enable specific parts of makefiles without them the build will fail. (So I had to add libtool as a BR) 5. builds in mock for fc5 i386 & fc6 i386 configuration, new package seems working, rpmlint output: W: gtkmozembedmm-devel no-documentation -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 14 14:55:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 10:55:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205955] Review Request: gdal - A translator library for raster geospatial data formats In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609141455.k8EEtnve003143@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gdal - A translator library for raster geospatial data formats https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205955 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-09-14 10:55 EST ------- (In reply to comment #20 and comment #21) Patrice and Jason, good catch, thank you. Actually libgeotiff part in gdal code REALLY USES EPSG/POSC database. "REALLY USES" I said means that: Under gdal-1.3.2/frmts/gtiff/libgeotiff, the EPSG/POSC database epsg*.inc exist and these files are included in geonames.h, geovalues.h and these header files are used in .c source code. So, if using libgeotiff part in gdal code, it is ALSO legal issue. Joost, will you remove libgeotiff support? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 14 15:04:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 11:04:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188974] Review Request: libGLw In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609141504.k8EF43Dg003713@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libGLw https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188974 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-09-14 11:03 EST ------- ajax, it's been 1+ months since your last comment. You still interested in submitting/maintaining this? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 14 15:09:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 11:09:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197740] Review Request: dircproxy - IRC proxy server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609141509.k8EF9kIM003999@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dircproxy - IRC proxy server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197740 ------- Additional Comments From jwilson at redhat.com 2006-09-14 11:09 EST ------- (In reply to comment #11) > rpmlint, as it is wont to do, bestows upon us two errors: > > E: dircproxy executable-marked-as-config-file /etc/sysconfig/dircproxy > E: dircproxy script-without-shellbang /etc/sysconfig/dircproxy > > A chmod -x /etc/sysconfig/dircproxy should do the trick. Even better, fix a stupid copy-n-paste error, use install -m 0644 instead of install -m 755. :) (done in rel 0.4.beta) > Aside from that, it works and looks good to me! > > APPROVED Cool, importing rel 0.4.beta shortly... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 14 15:12:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 11:12:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205955] Review Request: gdal - A translator library for raster geospatial data formats In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609141512.k8EFC8lj004141@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gdal - A translator library for raster geospatial data formats https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205955 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-09-14 11:11 EST ------- Third review. 1. From http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines : * Legal - Legal issue needs checking (as argued above). * Code Vs Content - Well, again, what are the following files? /usr/share/gdal/seed_2d.dgn (in gdal) /usr/share/gdal/seed_3d.dgn (in gdal) I don't know what these files are. If you also don't know what these are, remove these files. 2. From http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines : = Nothing. 3. Other things I have noticed: * Well, when including man files in rpm package, the format like "gdal_contour.1*" (not gdal_contour.1.gz) is prefered. * Also, when includes all .py, .pyo, .pyc files, the format like "%{python_sitearch}/gdal.py*" (not writing 3 files seperately) is prefered. * Check again what you want to support. * Perhaps it must be considered why HDF4 support is disabled. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 14 15:13:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 11:13:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204852] Review Request: tuxpaint-stamps - Extra stamp files for tuxpaint In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609141513.k8EFDKrT004232@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tuxpaint-stamps - Extra stamp files for tuxpaint https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204852 ------- Additional Comments From steve at silug.org 2006-09-14 11:13 EST ------- Thanks. I finally got this imported into CVS. I just posted something to fedora-extras-list, but now I'm positive the error is bogus. That file is Swahili, and sw seems to be the correct locale for Swahili. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 14 15:20:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 11:20:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201006] Review Request: HelixPlayer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609141520.k8EFKXGm004872@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: HelixPlayer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201006 ------- Additional Comments From gauret at free.fr 2006-09-14 11:20 EST ------- Sure, it I can do anything to help, feel free to ask. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 14 15:42:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 11:42:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204852] Review Request: tuxpaint-stamps - Extra stamp files for tuxpaint In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609141542.k8EFgGu5006589@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tuxpaint-stamps - Extra stamp files for tuxpaint https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204852 steve at silug.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From steve at silug.org 2006-09-14 11:42 EST ------- (That last note was delayed thanks to my Internet connection going down last night.) Paul Howarth has reported the rpmlint issue upstream (http://rpmlint.zarb.org/cgi-bin/trac.cgi/ticket/49). It's definitely a bug. The FC-5 branch has been created, and a build is in progress. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 14 15:52:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 11:52:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205955] Review Request: gdal - A translator library for raster geospatial data formats In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609141552.k8EFqYMs007199@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gdal - A translator library for raster geospatial data formats https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205955 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-09-14 11:52 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=136274) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=136274&action=view) support for libdap and fix for hdf This fix the hdf4 issue, and add support for dods/libdap. This should work for devel libdap, for previous FC releases `dap-config --client-libs` should not be in LDFLAGS (and shouldn't need to be in LDFLAGS). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 14 16:20:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 12:20:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205955] Review Request: gdal - A translator library for raster geospatial data formats In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609141620.k8EGKtkk009564@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gdal - A translator library for raster geospatial data formats https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205955 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-09-14 12:20 EST ------- (In reply to comment #24) > Created an attachment (id=136274) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=136274&action=view) [edit] > support for libdap and fix for hdf I forgaot to add a Requires: libdap-devel for gdal-devel -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 14 16:35:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 12:35:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206395] Review Request: picocom - Minimal serial communications program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609141635.k8EGZSuN010531@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: picocom - Minimal serial communications program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206395 ------- Additional Comments From jafo-redhat at tummy.com 2006-09-14 12:35 EST ------- Thanks for the review. I put the strip in there because rpmlint was winging about the binary not being stripped. I've removed it and made all other changes. ftp://ftp.tummy.com/pub/tummy/RPMS/SRPMS/picocom.spec ftp://ftp.tummy.com/pub/tummy/RPMS/SRPMS/picocom-1.4-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 14 16:41:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 12:41:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206478] New: Review Request: Yumdiff - Compares RPMS installed on local and remote systems Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206478 Summary: Review Request: Yumdiff - Compares RPMS installed on local and remote systems Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: limb at jcomserv.net QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://gryffindor.jcomserv.net/yumdiff/yumdiff.spec SRPM URL: http://gryffindor.jcomserv.net/yumdiff/yumdiff-1.0-1.src.rpm Description: Yumdiff compares local installed RPMs to those installed on a remote host, and can call yum to install the packages missing on the local system. Written in Python for Fedora Core, Yumdiff is released under the GNU GPL. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 14 16:44:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 12:44:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206478] Review Request: Yumdiff - Compares RPMS installed on local and remote systems In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609141644.k8EGiSHr011022@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Yumdiff - Compares RPMS installed on local and remote systems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206478 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2006-09-14 12:44 EST ------- This is my first package, and I am seeking a sponsor. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 14 16:49:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 12:49:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203694] Review Request: rawstudio - digital camera raw-image converter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609141649.k8EGncHA011317@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rawstudio - digital camera raw-image converter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203694 ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at ameritech.net 2006-09-14 12:49 EST ------- Ping. Are you still interested in submitting this package to Fedora Extras? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 14 16:50:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 12:50:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200436] Review Request: gaim-gadugadu - Gadu-Gadu support in Gaim IM client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609141650.k8EGoumR011416@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gaim-gadugadu - Gadu-Gadu support in Gaim IM client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200436 mr.ecik at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mr.ecik at gmail.com 2006-09-14 12:50 EST ------- Approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 14 16:52:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 12:52:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206395] Review Request: picocom - Minimal serial communications program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609141652.k8EGquCv011576@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: picocom - Minimal serial communications program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206395 ------- Additional Comments From denis at poolshark.org 2006-09-14 12:52 EST ------- > I put the strip in there because rpmlint was winging > about the binary not being stripped This usually means you're missing an RPM development package. rpmdevtools, rpmlint or rpm-libs, i forget which one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 14 17:15:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 13:15:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197740] Review Request: dircproxy - IRC proxy server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609141715.k8EHFe64013551@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dircproxy - IRC proxy server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197740 jwilson at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From jwilson at redhat.com 2006-09-14 13:15 EST ------- Imported and built, closing ticket. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 14 17:24:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 13:24:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205955] Review Request: gdal - A translator library for raster geospatial data formats In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609141724.k8EHODMM014477@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gdal - A translator library for raster geospatial data formats https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205955 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at soeterbroek.com 2006-09-14 13:24 EST ------- (In reply to comment #22) > (In reply to comment #20 and comment #21) > So, if using libgeotiff part in gdal code, it is ALSO > legal issue. Joost, will you remove libgeotiff support? Ok, I will. If I understand the configure options correctly, this would translate in these options (among others): --with-libtiff=no --with-geotiff=no --with-geos=yes Correct? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 14 17:30:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 13:30:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205955] Review Request: gdal - A translator library for raster geospatial data formats In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609141730.k8EHUWKR015134@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gdal - A translator library for raster geospatial data formats https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205955 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at soeterbroek.com 2006-09-14 13:30 EST ------- (In reply to comment #24) > This should work for devel libdap, for previous FC releases > `dap-config --client-libs` should not be in LDFLAGS > (and shouldn't need to be in LDFLAGS). My dap-config does not have '--client-libs' option: $ dap-config --client-libs unknown option: --client-libs Suppose I should use: $ dap-config --libs -L/usr/lib -ldap -L/usr/lib -lcurl -L/usr/kerberos/lib -lssl -lcrypto -ldl -lz -lgssapi_krb5 -lkrb5 -lk5crypto -lkrb5support -lcom_err -lresolv -lidn -lssl -lcrypto -lz -L/usr/lib -lxml2 -lz -lm -lpthread -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 14 17:41:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 13:41:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205955] Review Request: gdal - A translator library for raster geospatial data formats In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609141741.k8EHfPRh016626@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gdal - A translator library for raster geospatial data formats https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205955 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at soeterbroek.com 2006-09-14 13:41 EST ------- (In reply to comment #26) > (In reply to comment #22) > > (In reply to comment #20 and comment #21) > > > So, if using libgeotiff part in gdal code, it is ALSO > > legal issue. Joost, will you remove libgeotiff support? > > Ok, I will. > If I understand the configure options correctly, this would translate in these > options (among others): > > --with-libtiff=no > --with-geotiff=no > --with-geos=yes > > Correct? > Actually, using options: --with-libtiff=yes --with-geotiff=no results in configure error: using pre-installed libtiff. checking for XTIFFClientOpen in -lgeotiff... no configure: error: We require at least GeoTIFF 1.2.1. Consider using the one supplied with GDAL -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 14 17:46:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 13:46:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206487] New: Review Request: jd - A 2ch browser Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206487 Summary: Review Request: jd - A 2ch browser Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~mtasaka/dist/extras/development/SPECS/jd.spec SRPM URL: http://www.ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~mtasaka/dist/extras/development/SRPMS/jd-170-0.1.b_060914.fc6.src.rpm Description: JD is a 2ch browser based on gtkmm2. ------------------------------------- NOTE: For reviews: from en.wikipedia: 2channel (2ni channeru?, 2ch for short) is thought to be the largest Internet forum in the world.With over 10 million visitors every day (as of 2001), it is gaining significant influence in Japanese society, approaching that of traditional mass media such as television, radio, and magazines. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 14 17:49:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 13:49:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205955] Review Request: gdal - A translator library for raster geospatial data formats In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609141749.k8EHnlO7017575@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gdal - A translator library for raster geospatial data formats https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205955 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-09-14 13:49 EST ------- (In reply to comment #28) > Actually, using options: > > --with-libtiff=yes > --with-geotiff=no > > results in configure error: > > using pre-installed libtiff. > checking for XTIFFClientOpen in -lgeotiff... no > configure: error: We require at least GeoTIFF 1.2.1. Consider using the one > supplied with GDAL > > Well, actually I have the same error. I suppose this needs a patch. I will check it. And... adding "dap-config --client-libs" will not enable DODS support. I will check is "dap-config --libs" works. Then, will someone review my review request: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206487 ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 14 17:52:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 13:52:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205955] Review Request: gdal - A translator library for raster geospatial data formats In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609141752.k8EHq7M6017781@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gdal - A translator library for raster geospatial data formats https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205955 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-09-14 13:51 EST ------- (In reply to comment #29) > > And... adding "dap-config --client-libs" will not enable DODS support. > I will check is "dap-config --libs" works. > Sorry, DODS support was enabled by including libdap-devel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 14 17:53:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 13:53:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205955] Review Request: gdal - A translator library for raster geospatial data formats In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609141753.k8EHr4dE017882@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gdal - A translator library for raster geospatial data formats https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205955 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-09-14 13:53 EST ------- Well, again sorry. For me, "dap-config --client-libs" works. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 14 17:55:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 13:55:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205955] Review Request: gdal - A translator library for raster geospatial data formats In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609141755.k8EHtBZu017979@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gdal - A translator library for raster geospatial data formats https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205955 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-09-14 13:55 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=136286) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=136286&action=view) gdal.spec I used gdal.spec I used. The big problem left is how to disable libgeotiff support. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 14 17:57:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 13:57:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205955] Review Request: gdal - A translator library for raster geospatial data formats In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609141757.k8EHvDxj018145@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gdal - A translator library for raster geospatial data formats https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205955 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at soeterbroek.com 2006-09-14 13:57 EST ------- (In reply to comment #31) > Well, again sorry. For me, "dap-config --client-libs" works. I am using libdap-devel-3.6.0-1.fc5: $ /usr/bin/dap-config --client-libs unknown option: --client-libs -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 14 18:04:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 14:04:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206492] New: Review Request: ssss - Shamir's secret sharing scheme Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206492 Summary: Review Request: ssss - Shamir's secret sharing scheme Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: paul at xtdnet.nl QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: ftp://ftp.xelerance.com/ssss/ssss.spec SRPM URL: ftp://ftp.xelerance.com/ssss/ssss-0.5-1.src.rpm Description: ssss is an implementation of Shamir's secret sharing scheme. ssss does both: the generation of shares for a known secret and the reconstruction of a secret using user provided shares. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 14 18:08:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 14:08:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204227] Review Request: foremost - Console program to recover files based on their headers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609141808.k8EI8cNi018874@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: foremost - Console program to recover files based on their headers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204227 toshio at tiki-lounge.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |toshio at tiki-lounge.com ------- Additional Comments From toshio at tiki-lounge.com 2006-09-14 14:08 EST ------- Sorry, I missed your entry earlier. I find foremost in the repository for FC5 Extras: $ repoquery foremost foremost-0:1.3-0.1.20060826.fc5.x86_64 Looked on mirrors.kernel.org and it's definitely in the i386 repository as well. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 14 18:13:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 14:13:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206492] Review Request: ssss - Shamir's secret sharing scheme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609141813.k8EIDEmI019244@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ssss - Shamir's secret sharing scheme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206492 Jochen at herr-schmitt.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |Jochen at herr-schmitt.de OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From Jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2006-09-14 14:13 EST ------- Good: + rpmlint don't complaints source rpm. Bad: - Local build complaints: cc1: error: unrecognized command line option "-fasynchronous-unwind-tables/-O2" Fehler: Fehler-Status beim Beenden von /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.11940 (%build) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 14 18:16:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 14:16:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206494] New: Review Request: ssss - Shamir's secret sharing scheme Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206494 Summary: Review Request: ssss - Shamir's secret sharing scheme Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: paul at xtdnet.nl QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: ftp://ftp.xelerance.com/ssss/ssss.spec SRPM URL: ftp://ftp.xelerance.com/ssss/ssss-0.5-1.src.rpm Description: ssss is an implementation of Shamir's secret sharing scheme. ssss does both: the generation of shares for a known secret and the reconstruction of a secret using user provided shares. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 14 18:23:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 14:23:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205955] Review Request: gdal - A translator library for raster geospatial data formats In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609141823.k8EINuud020456@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gdal - A translator library for raster geospatial data formats https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205955 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-09-14 14:23 EST ------- Well, it is found that: * on FC5, 'dap-config --libs' is okay (and 'dap-config --client-libs' bears error) * on FC6-devel, 'dag-config --libs' won't work!! /bin/sh /builddir/build/BUILD/gdal-1.3.2/libtool --mode=link g++ ogrinfo.o /builddir/build/BUILD/gdal-1.3.2/libgdal.la -o ogrinfo g++ ogrinfo.o -o .libs/ogrinfo /builddir/build/BUILD/gdal-1.3.2/.libs/libgdal.so -L/usr/lib/netcdf-3 -L/usr/lib/hdf -L/usr/lib -L/usr/kerberos/lib -lgeos -lodbc -ljasper -lhdf5 -lmfhdf -ldf -lgif -ljpeg -ltiff -lpng -lnetcdf -L/usr/include/cfitsio -L/usr/include/cfitsio/lib -lcfitsio -lpq -lrt -ldap -lcurl -lgssapi_krb5 -lkrb5 -lk5crypto -lcom_err -lresolv -ldl -lidn -lxml2 -lpthread -lsqlite3 -L/usr/lib/mysql -lmysqlclient -lz -lcrypt -lnsl -lssl -lcrypto /builddir/build/BUILD/gdal-1.3.2/.libs/libgdal.so: undefined reference to `AISConnect::AISConnect(std::basic_string, std::allocator > const&)' /builddir/build/BUILD/gdal-1.3.2/.libs/libgdal.so: undefined reference to `RCReader::instance()' collect2: ld returned 1 exit status make[1]: *** [ogrinfo] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/gdal-1.3.2/ogr' make: *** [ogr-apps] Error 2 error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.80418 (%build) RPM build errors: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.80418 (%build) on FC6-devel, it must "dap-config --client-libs". So, a switch is needed so if dap-config accepts '--client-libs', use it and otherwise, use '--libs' -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 14 18:51:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 14:51:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192876] Review Request: V2Strip ID3v2(Mp3 Files) tags remover In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609141851.k8EIpHTA024805@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: V2Strip ID3v2(Mp3 Files) tags remover https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192876 ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2006-09-14 14:51 EST ------- This has been approved for more than 3 months. If it doesn't show movement soon, I'm going to rescind my approval and close this bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 14 19:33:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 15:33:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206395] Review Request: picocom - Minimal serial communications program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609141933.k8EJXF4k000346@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: picocom - Minimal serial communications program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206395 ------- Additional Comments From jafo-redhat at tummy.com 2006-09-14 15:32 EST ------- Obviously I ha rpmlint :-). I already had rpm-libs, so it must have been rpmdevtools. I've got it installed now, thanks. Sean -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 14 19:37:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 15:37:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205955] Review Request: gdal - A translator library for raster geospatial data formats In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609141937.k8EJbExU001285@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gdal - A translator library for raster geospatial data formats https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205955 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-09-14 15:37 EST ------- (In reply to comment #34) > Well, it is found that: > > * on FC5, 'dap-config --libs' is okay (and 'dap-config --client-libs' bears > error) This is what is done by the configure.in, so on fc5 there is nothing to add in LDFLAGS to have dap support. > * on FC6-devel, 'dag-config --libs' won't work!! In the version in devel the libdap library has been split in 3: libdapclient, libdapserver and libdap. gdal needs to link against what is provided by libdapclient. In that version `dap-config --libs` provides only libdap. So it doesn't work, and that's why dap-config --clients-libs has to be added in LDFLAGS. In the previous version (in FC5), the libdap library is linked with dap-config --libs and since it is not split everything is okay. > RPM build errors: > Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.80418 (%build) > > on FC6-devel, it must "dap-config --client-libs". > > So, a switch is needed so if dap-config accepts '--client-libs', use > it and otherwise, use '--libs' That's approximately what is done in the latest autoconf macro. I'll propose a patch for the spec file shortly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 14 19:44:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 15:44:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206395] Review Request: picocom - Minimal serial communications program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609141944.k8EJiFCM002586@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: picocom - Minimal serial communications program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206395 denis at poolshark.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From denis at poolshark.org 2006-09-14 15:44 EST ------- MUST items: - rpmlint clean - package names ok - spec follows guidelines - GPL license verified and included - tarball md5sum verified - clean mock build - own its directories - permissions good - no %files duplicates - standard Group: - executable is working - good %clean section I hereby solemny declare this package APPROVED! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 14 19:46:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 15:46:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205955] Review Request: gdal - A translator library for raster geospatial data formats In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609141946.k8EJk9Ob002917@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gdal - A translator library for raster geospatial data formats https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205955 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #136274|0 |1 is obsolete| | ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-09-14 15:46 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=136299) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=136299&action=view) fix hdf link, and add support for libdap for FC5 and devel I haven't tested on FC5, only on devel -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 14 20:37:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 16:37:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205136] Review Request: gg2 - GNU Gadu 2 - free talking In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609142037.k8EKbu0t008953@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gg2 - GNU Gadu 2 - free talking https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205136 mr.ecik at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mr.ecik at gmail.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mr.ecik at gmail.com 2006-09-14 16:37 EST ------- I'll review it, but as mentioned above, there is problem with mock build: dbus_plugin.c: In function 'ofi_getProtocols': dbus_plugin.c:143: warning: ISO C90 forbids mixed declarations and code dbus_plugin.c: In function 'start_plugin': dbus_plugin.c:301: warning: cast from pointer to integer of different size /bin/sh ../../../libtool --silent --tag=CC --mode=link gcc -O2 -g -pipe -Wall - Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64 -mtune=generic -pthread -Wall -Wno-uninitialized -Wchar-subscripts - Wnested-externs -Wpointer-arith -Wno-sign-compare -I/usr/include/glib-2.0 -I/ usr/lib64/glib-2.0/include -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 - fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64 -mtune=generic - pthread -Wall -Wno-uninitialized -Wchar-subscripts -Wnested-externs -Wpointer- arith -Wno-sign-compare -I/usr/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/lib64/glib-2.0/ include -D_REENTRANT -D_GNU_SOURCE -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -Wdeclaration- after-statement -I/usr/local/include -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -I/usr/include/gdbm -I/usr/lib64/perl5/5.8.8/x86_64-linux-thread-multi/CORE - I/builddir/build/BUILD/gg2-2.2.9/lib -lglib-2.0 -pthread -lgthread-2.0 - lglib-2.0 -o libdbus_plugin.la -rpath /usr/lib64/gg2 -avoid-version libdbus_plugin_la-dbus_plugin.lo -ldbus-glib-1 -ldbus-1 -lglib-2.0 ../../../ lib/libgg2_core.la -pthread /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -ldbus-glib-1 collect2: ld returned 1 exit status gmake[4]: *** [libdbus_plugin.la] Error 1 gmake[4]: Leaving directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/gg2-2.2.9/src/plugins/dbus' gmake[3]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 gmake[3]: Leaving directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/gg2-2.2.9/src/plugins' gmake[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 gmake[2]: Leaving directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/gg2-2.2.9/src' gmake[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/gg2-2.2.9' make: *** [all] Error 2 error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.5727 (%build) RPM build errors: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.5727 (%build) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 14 20:44:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 16:44:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205929] Review Request: libfreebob - FreeBoB firewire audio driver library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609142044.k8EKiuOP009685@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libfreebob - FreeBoB firewire audio driver library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205929 Bug 205929 depends on bug 205928, which changed state. Bug 205928 Summary: Please upgrade libavc1394 to 0.5.3 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205928 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|NEW |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 14 21:04:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 17:04:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205032] Review Request: perl-Test-AutoBuild - a framework for continuous, unatttended software builds In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609142104.k8EL4isG012107@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-AutoBuild - a framework for continuous, unatttended software builds https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205032 ------- Additional Comments From berrange at redhat.com 2006-09-14 17:04 EST ------- Opps, I should have known I'd miss one of those directories! I'll fix that before importing to CVS. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 14 21:05:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 17:05:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205136] Review Request: gg2 - GNU Gadu 2 - free talking In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609142105.k8EL5NNL012160@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gg2 - GNU Gadu 2 - free talking https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205136 ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2006-09-14 17:05 EST ------- This is due to missing BuildRequires: dbus-glib. I'll post an updated spec tomorrow. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 14 21:10:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 17:10:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196669] Review Request: filesystem-i18n In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609142110.k8ELA4dW012567@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: filesystem-i18n https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196669 notting at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |notting at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From notting at redhat.com 2006-09-14 17:09 EST ------- I'd rather it go in Core, actually. I just want a way to not have to hand-maintain a list. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 14 21:30:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 17:30:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200436] Review Request: gaim-gadugadu - Gadu-Gadu support in Gaim IM client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609142130.k8ELUNJF014728@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gaim-gadugadu - Gadu-Gadu support in Gaim IM client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200436 raven at pmail.pl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 14 21:33:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 17:33:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200436] Review Request: gaim-gadugadu - Gadu-Gadu support in Gaim IM client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609142133.k8ELXJU2015125@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gaim-gadugadu - Gadu-Gadu support in Gaim IM client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200436 ------- Additional Comments From raven at pmail.pl 2006-09-14 17:33 EST ------- devel created and built successfully, closing as NEXTRELEASE. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 14 22:23:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 18:23:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206222] Review Request: manaworld-music - music for the manaworld game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609142223.k8EMNbl7018672@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: manaworld-music - music for the manaworld game Alias: manaworld-music https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206222 ville.skytta at iki.fi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn|206383 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 14 23:06:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 19:06:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205032] Review Request: perl-Test-AutoBuild - a framework for continuous, unatttended software builds In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609142306.k8EN6D7n022023@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-AutoBuild - a framework for continuous, unatttended software builds https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205032 berrange at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From berrange at redhat.com 2006-09-14 19:06 EST ------- Ok, imported perl-Test-AutoBuild-1.2.0-3.src.rpm into CVS with the fixed mentioned in c #4 incorporated. The plague build suceeded so I'm closing this ticket now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 15 00:26:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 20:26:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205955] Review Request: gdal - A translator library for raster geospatial data formats In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609150026.k8F0QxD2025585@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gdal - A translator library for raster geospatial data formats https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205955 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |182235 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-09-14 20:26 EST ------- Well, no way to fix for libgeotiff dependency. Now I make this bug block FE-legal. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 15 00:29:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 20:29:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205955] Review Request: gdal - A translator library for raster geospatial data formats In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609150029.k8F0T2tP025673@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gdal - A translator library for raster geospatial data formats https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205955 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |178162 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 15 00:29:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 20:29:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 178162] Review Request: libgeotiff In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609150029.k8F0TOb6025697@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgeotiff https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=178162 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |205955 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 15 00:34:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 20:34:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 178162] Review Request: libgeotiff In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609150034.k8F0YqhT025879@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgeotiff https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=178162 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora at soeterbroek.com, | |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-09-14 20:34 EST ------- Well gdal (bug 205955) has the copies of libgeotiff code in it, and it seems that it is not possible to remove libgeotiff code from gdal. And libgeotiff code in gdal package surely uses .inc files of which the legal issue is questionable. I mark gdal (bug 205955) depending on this bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 15 00:54:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 20:54:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205887] Review Request: perl-HTTP-Body - HTTP Body Parser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609150054.k8F0s0sV026555@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-HTTP-Body - HTTP Body Parser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205887 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2006-09-14 20:53 EST ------- Built, thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 15 01:05:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 21:05:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 178162] Review Request: libgeotiff In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609150105.k8F15XoB026956@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgeotiff https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=178162 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-09-14 21:05 EST ------- Reported upstream. http://bugzilla.remotesensing.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1294 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 15 01:21:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 21:21:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205955] Review Request: gdal - A translator library for raster geospatial data formats In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609150121.k8F1LJDR027619@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gdal - A translator library for raster geospatial data formats https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205955 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2006-09-14 21:21 EST ------- Further issues: * BLOCKER: gdal-devel ships an autoheader-generated header file (/usr/include/gdal/cpl_config.h). This violates autoconf's working principles and prevents autoconf-based packages from using gdal. * SHOULDFIX: The way cfitsio is being configed is broken: ATM, you pass --with-cfitsio=/usr/include/cfitso This causes gdal to use -I/usr/include/cfits and -L/usr/include/cfits/lib. The latter is incorrect. A proper way would be to pass --with-cfitsio and to append -I/usr/include/cfitsio to CPPFLAGS -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 15 02:28:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 22:28:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206492] Review Request: ssss - Shamir's secret sharing scheme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609150228.k8F2SeqP031403@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ssss - Shamir's secret sharing scheme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206492 ------- Additional Comments From paul at xtdnet.nl 2006-09-14 22:28 EST ------- Thanks for checking the package. It was an odd error on my end. I used: gcc $RPM_OPT_FLAGS/%{optflags} -lgmp -o ssss-split ssss.c Of course, I should have used either $RPM_OPT_FLAGS or %{optflags} Oddly enough, it built fine on my x86_64 with those broken flags. But I fixed it now: Spec URL: ftp://ftp.xelerance.com/ssss/ssss.spec SRPM URL: ftp://ftp.xelerance.com/ssss/ssss-0.5-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 15 02:40:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 22:40:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201000] Review Request: libFoundation - A free implementation of OpenStep's Foundation Kit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609150240.k8F2e7mo032341@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libFoundation - A free implementation of OpenStep's Foundation Kit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201000 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2006-09-14 22:40 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > > warning: File listed twice: /usr/include/extensions > warning: File listed twice: /usr/include/extensions/DefaultScannerHandler.h > ... > warning: File listed twice: /usr/include/extensions/support.h > warning: File listed twice: /usr/include/lfmemory.h > warning: File listed twice: /usr/include/real_exception_file.h Yet another case of a package polluting /usr/include. IMO, /usr/include/extensions definitely is too general to be acceptable, the headers in /usr/include/ are arguable. I strongly recommend to move all /usr/include/* to a subdirectory. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 15 03:11:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 23:11:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187913] Review Request: mysql-query-browser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609150311.k8F3Bqcp002114@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mysql-query-browser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187913 imlinux at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From imlinux at gmail.com 2006-09-14 23:11 EST ------- Sorry for the delay, I didn't realize this was an upstream bug. - Looks good - Builds in mock - Matches packaging guidelines - contains required files - contains desktop rpmlint no output for binaries see below Non blocker rpmlint from the srpm: W: mysql-query-browser mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 15 03:40:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 23:40:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188482] Review Request: scipy-0.4.8 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609150340.k8F3e4NQ004358@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scipy-0.4.8 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188482 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO_REPORTER |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG OtherBugsDependingO|163776, 177841 |201449 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 15 03:43:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 23:43:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205136] Review Request: gg2 - GNU Gadu 2 - free talking In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609150343.k8F3hJX9004619@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gg2 - GNU Gadu 2 - free talking https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205136 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |206576 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-09-14 23:43 EST ------- Well, autually: A. my mock failure was due to dbus-glib-devel missing. This is on FC6-devel. B. The mock failure by Micha?? is on FC5, perhaps? This is because /usr/lib/libdbus-glib-1.so points to nothing. I reported this to dbus maintainer. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206576 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 15 03:45:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 23:45:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205136] Review Request: gg2 - GNU Gadu 2 - free talking In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609150345.k8F3jTOc004773@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gg2 - GNU Gadu 2 - free talking https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205136 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-09-14 23:45 EST ------- Forgot to comment one more: On FC5, dbus-glib(-devel) does not exist ,included in dbus(-devel). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 15 03:49:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 23:49:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205136] Review Request: gg2 - GNU Gadu 2 - free talking In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609150349.k8F3nxxX005077@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gg2 - GNU Gadu 2 - free talking https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205136 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-09-14 23:49 EST ------- Oh, sorry. My misunderstanding.. A. my mock failure was due to dbus-glib-devel missing. this is correct on FC6-devel. B. On FC5, dbus-glib surely exists, however, dbus-devel does not require dbus-glib so the symlink is broken. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 15 03:57:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 23:57:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205136] Review Request: gg2 - GNU Gadu 2 - free talking In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609150357.k8F3vbOf005595@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gg2 - GNU Gadu 2 - free talking https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205136 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn|206576 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 15 03:58:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 23:58:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205136] Review Request: gg2 - GNU Gadu 2 - free talking In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609150358.k8F3wrVP005675@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gg2 - GNU Gadu 2 - free talking https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205136 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |206576 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 15 04:55:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 00:55:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204343] Review Request: qcomicbook - a comic book viewing program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609150455.k8F4tYdB007424@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qcomicbook - a comic book viewing program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204343 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-09-15 00:55 EST ------- Well, I cannot see qcomicbook on buildsys or mirror server yet. What is happening? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 15 05:17:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 01:17:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205912] Review Request: Thunar - Thunar File Manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609150517.k8F5HcVN008150@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Thunar - Thunar File Manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205912 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-09-15 01:17 EST ------- ok, thanks for the excellent feedback. I think I have addressed all your comments. I have left the tpa plugin/desktop removed/commented out. Comment in those lines if you build against the beta repo. Changelog: * Thu Sep 14 2006 Kevin Fenzi - 0.4.0-0.3.rc1 - Cleaned up BuildRequires some more - Disabled tpa plugin and desktop for now - Moved some files from doc/Thunar to be %%doc - Changed man to use wildcard in files - Added examples to devel subpackage - Made sure some examples are not executable. Spec: http://www.scrye.com/~kevin/extras/Thunar/Thunar.spec Srpm: http://www.scrye.com/~kevin/extras/Thunar/Thunar-0.4.0-0.3.rc1.fc6.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 15 05:40:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 01:40:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206478] Review Request: Yumdiff - Compares RPMS installed on local and remote systems In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609150540.k8F5eawK009521@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Yumdiff - Compares RPMS installed on local and remote systems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206478 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-09-15 01:40 EST ------- There needs some SPEC file changes. I have done it for you. Add Changelog entry and add direct download upstream tarball URL and rebuild SRPM and post here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 15 05:41:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 01:41:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206478] Review Request: Yumdiff - Compares RPMS installed on local and remote systems In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609150541.k8F5fn6A009561@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Yumdiff - Compares RPMS installed on local and remote systems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206478 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-09-15 01:41 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=136329) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=136329&action=view) Clean SPEC file -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 15 07:13:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 03:13:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205023] Review Request: filelight-1.0 - cool diskspace use browser for kde In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609150713.k8F7DZ6k013058@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: filelight-1.0 - cool diskspace use browser for kde https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205023 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778, 177841 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-09-15 03:13 EST ------- Looks good, I'll sponsor you now, if you create an account I'll sponsor you and then you can import and build this and kdiff3 as documented in the wiki. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 15 07:14:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 03:14:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191473] Review Request: kdiff3: Compare + merge 2 or 3 files or directories In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609150714.k8F7EXfM013154@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdiff3: Compare + merge 2 or 3 files or directories https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191473 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778, 177841 |163779 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 15 07:55:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 03:55:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193531] Review Request: kicad - Electronic schematic diagrams and printed circuit board artwork In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609150755.k8F7tmI6015861@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kicad - Electronic schematic diagrams and printed circuit board artwork https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193531 cgoorah at yahoo.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | Fixed In Version| |kicad-2006.06.26-5 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2006-09-15 03:55 EST ------- (In reply to comment #28) > Now that its added it should have it's own bugzilla component to report bugs. > > Please close this bug again as NEXTRELEASE and file a new bug against kicad... True, I should file a new bug: (see 206602) Closing this bug ... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 15 08:32:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 04:32:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205912] Review Request: Thunar - Thunar File Manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609150832.k8F8WK6h018936@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Thunar - Thunar File Manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205912 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |pertusus at free.fr OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-09-15 04:32 EST ------- We're getting near. * There are dependencies for the devel package that are missing. It may need more investigation, but looks like one need at least: Requires: exo-devel >= 0.3.1.10 * doc files moved to %docs should be removed from %_datadir/doc/Thunar. * some files are listed twice, becacuse of: %{_datadir}/Thunar/ %{_datadir}/Thunar/sendto/thunar-sendto-email.desktop It should be %dir %{_datadir}/Thunar/ %dir %{_datadir}/Thunar/sendto/ %{_datadir}/Thunar/sendto/thunar-sendto-email.desktop or %{_datadir}/Thunar/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 15 12:50:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 08:50:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205755] Review Request: elsa - manages group of processes and allows accounting In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609151250.k8FCo7mR003623@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: elsa - manages group of processes and allows accounting https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205755 guillaume.thouvenin at bull.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 15 13:07:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 09:07:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 165230] Review Request: Eclipse Graphical Editing Framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609151307.k8FD7Am2005429@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Eclipse Graphical Editing Framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=165230 ------- Additional Comments From overholt at redhat.com 2006-09-15 09:06 EST ------- I actually already submitted GEF and it was approved :) That was a new version with a new way of building. Sorry to take this from you, Aaron, but I know you're busy and not involved everyday with this like I am. This bug should be closed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 15 13:10:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 09:10:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 165230] Review Request: Eclipse Graphical Editing Framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609151310.k8FDAscH005624@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Eclipse Graphical Editing Framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=165230 matthias at rpmforge.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX OtherBugsDependingO|163778 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From matthias at rpmforge.net 2006-09-15 09:10 EST ------- Closing as WONTFIX then... better than staying idle anyway ;-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 15 13:24:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 09:24:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205136] Review Request: gg2 - GNU Gadu 2 - free talking In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609151324.k8FDOGl8006679@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gg2 - GNU Gadu 2 - free talking https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205136 ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2006-09-15 09:24 EST ------- http://rpm.greysector.net/extras/gg2.spec Updated spec builds cleanly in fc5 and fc6 mock. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 15 13:58:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 09:58:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199108] Review Request: gutenprint: Printer Drivers Package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609151358.k8FDw5JJ009197@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gutenprint: Printer Drivers Package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199108 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at leemhuis.info 2006-09-15 09:58 EST ------- (In reply to comment #49) > This package builds fine and installs ok alongside gimp-print. Unfortunately, I > only have one printer here and it's being cranky. I am able to select the > gutenprint drivers in system-config-printer and in the cups admin interface. > Can some more of the folks watching this review try the package out and see if > they run into any problems? It's looking ok here from prelim testing... I currently don't have hardware at hand to test it. Just my 2 cent: I'd say just approve this package if it looks okay otherwise and if the packagers made sure it works -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 15 14:38:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 10:38:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205755] Review Request: elsa - manages group of processes and allows accounting In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609151438.k8FEc2pp011976@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: elsa - manages group of processes and allows accounting https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205755 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |163776 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-09-15 10:38 EST ------- For some reason the FE-NEW blocker was removed from this ticket. It will never get reviewed if it doesn't show up in the FE-NEW list, so I'll re-add it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 15 15:14:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 11:14:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192313] Review Request: koan In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609151514.k8FFEQwE014737@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: koan https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192313 dlutter at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |dlutter at redhat.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From dlutter at redhat.com 2006-09-15 11:14 EST ------- Two small comments: * Don't define the %name macro manually, setting 'Name:' will do that for you * The way you define INSTALLED_FILES leads to /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/koan/ and subdirs to not be owned by koan and sticking around after an uninstall. The %files section should read something like %files %defattr(-,root,root) %{_bindir}/koan /usr/lib/python?.?/site-packages/koan %{_mandir}/man1/koan.1.gz * Just as a suggestion that won't block this package: since you are upstream for this, you should include a copy of the GPL in COPYING, and %doc it in the specfile -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 15 15:16:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 11:16:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192313] Review Request: koan In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609151516.k8FFG060014915@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: koan https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192313 dlutter at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 15 15:17:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 11:17:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192311] Review Request: cobbler In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609151517.k8FFHe6e015010@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cobbler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192311 dlutter at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 15 15:29:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 11:29:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205798] Review Request: xine-lib - The Xine library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609151529.k8FFTYc9015688@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xine-lib - The Xine library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205798 ------- Additional Comments From gauret at free.fr 2006-09-15 11:29 EST ------- Do you know how long the legal audit is likely to take ? Could we expect xine-lib in FC6, or is it much too close ? The SuSE specfile contains a mini-audit, if it can be of any help: http://gauret.free.fr/fichiers/rpms/fedora/xine-lib.suse.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 15 16:06:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 12:06:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205798] Review Request: xine-lib - The Xine library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609151606.k8FG6xNQ018700@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xine-lib - The Xine library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205798 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2006-09-15 12:06 EST ------- No idea. Some packages have been waiting a long time, eg. mkvtoolnix 9+ months in bug 177134. See also http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-extras-list/2006-August/msg00199.html There was a word from someone that getting the legal queue moving would be put on the Board's agenda, but I haven't heard more about that, and summaries for the two last Board meetings seem to be missing from Wiki. Rex, any news? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 15 16:26:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 12:26:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205798] Review Request: xine-lib - The Xine library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609151626.k8FGQ48o021000@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xine-lib - The Xine library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205798 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-09-15 12:25 EST ------- > Rex, any news? Other than the last 2 FPB meetings weren't held (for various reasons). I'll make sure it's discussed by FPB at next opportunity. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 15 16:31:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 12:31:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205798] Review Request: xine-lib - The Xine library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609151631.k8FGVo2N021836@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xine-lib - The Xine library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205798 ------- Additional Comments From denis at poolshark.org 2006-09-15 12:31 EST ------- How is this package going to coexist with the various xine-libs available from "other repos" and legally used by people in countries with no software patents ? Since xine-lib has to be crippled to make it into Extras, won't it create an unnecessary annoyance ? Does it add real value to FE ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 15 16:44:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 12:44:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205136] Review Request: gg2 - GNU Gadu 2 - free talking In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609151644.k8FGiDJb023590@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gg2 - GNU Gadu 2 - free talking https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205136 Bug 205136 depends on bug 206576, which changed state. Bug 206576 Summary: corrupted symlink in dbus-devel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206576 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution| |DEFERRED Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 15 16:44:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 12:44:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205136] Review Request: gg2 - GNU Gadu 2 - free talking In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609151644.k8FGiwdw023674@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gg2 - GNU Gadu 2 - free talking https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205136 ------- Additional Comments From mr.ecik at gmail.com 2006-09-15 12:44 EST ------- MUST items: * rpmlint output: W: gg2 mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs W: gg2 doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/gg2-2.2.9/gg2sms /usr/bin/perl W: gg2 doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/gg2-2.2.9/mkgg2snap /bin/sh W: gg2 doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/gg2-2.2.9/plugin_example/build.sh / bin/sh W: gg2-arts no-documentation W: gg2-devel no-documentation W: gg2-dockapp no-documentation W: gg2-esound no-documentation W: gg2-gadu-gadu no-documentation W: gg2-jabber no-documentation W: gg2-systray no-documentation W: gg2-tlen no-documentation W: gg2-xosd no-documentation * package is named well * spec file is named well * package meets Packaging Guidelines * package is licensed with an GPL open-source compatible license * License field matches actual license * license is included in %doc * spec is legible * md5sums are matching (e12c2153993dbbf66f8cefa3c628e7cd) * package succesfully compiles on x86_64 * BRs are listed properly * spec handles locales properly * proper %post and %postun sections * not relocatable * package owns its directories * no duplicates in %files * every %files section includes %defattr * proper %clean section * no need to doc subpackage * .pc files and headers are in -devel * .la file in -devel THINGS to do: * cosmetics: fix warning with mixed-spaces-and-tabs in spec * remove unnecessary dependiences (caused by %doc files) by adding following lines to %prep: chmod -x contrib/gg2sms chmod -x contrib/mkgg2snap chmod -x contrib/plugin_example/build.sh * you probably should remove libgg2_core.la from -devel subpackage Fix things mentioned above, and I'll approve this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 15 16:48:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 12:48:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205798] Review Request: xine-lib - The Xine library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609151648.k8FGmJLL024043@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xine-lib - The Xine library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205798 dennis at ausil.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dennis at ausil.us ------- Additional Comments From dennis at ausil.us 2006-09-15 12:48 EST ------- xine-lib is the only viable engine on some arches for amarok. other repos should be able to have a xine-lib-extras package that has non free bits for those that can use them. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 15 16:49:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 12:49:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205798] Review Request: xine-lib - The Xine library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609151649.k8FGn0GR024133@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xine-lib - The Xine library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205798 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-09-15 12:48 EST ------- Re: comment #10 > other repos If this makes it in, there are plans to also make a xine-libs-extras-nonfree for "other" repos. > Does it add real value to FE ? IMO, a *definite* yes. We'll be able to include apps that depend on xine-lib-devel to build (otherwise they wouldn't be included in Extras *at all*). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 15 16:51:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 12:51:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205798] Review Request: xine-lib - The Xine library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609151651.k8FGpADx024404@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xine-lib - The Xine library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205798 ------- Additional Comments From denis at poolshark.org 2006-09-15 12:50 EST ------- Excellent! thanks for the clarification. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 15 17:18:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 13:18:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196669] Review Request: filesystem-i18n In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609151718.k8FHITPr026356@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: filesystem-i18n https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196669 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-09-15 13:18 EST ------- > I'd rather it go in Core, actually who to maintain it then? you? (; > I just want a way to not have to hand-maintain a list. No solution yet... *unless* we want to make a Fedora (packagining?) policy stating something like: This list of locale's are officially supported by Fedora ... packages MUST not include locale-specific bits from locale's not included in this list. And then you maintain the "official" locale list. (: (to be updated from time-time, of course, but hopefully, it should stay relatively constant) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 15 17:22:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 13:22:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205136] Review Request: gg2 - GNU Gadu 2 - free talking In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609151722.k8FHMdiJ026673@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gg2 - GNU Gadu 2 - free talking https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205136 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-09-15 13:22 EST ------- Well, * redundant BuildRequires: aspell-devel <- required by gtkspell-devel esound-devel <- required by arts-devel glib2-devel <- required by gtk2-devel gnutls-devel <- required by loudmouth-devel gtk2-devel <- required by gtkspell-developenssl-devel openssl-devel <- required by libgadu-devel perl (included in minimal buildroot) pkgconfig <- required by glib2-devel (and others) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 15 17:23:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 13:23:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205136] Review Request: gg2 - GNU Gadu 2 - free talking In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609151723.k8FHNfjc026761@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gg2 - GNU Gadu 2 - free talking https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205136 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-09-15 13:23 EST ------- The line gtk2-devel was: gtk2-devel <- required by gtkspel -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 15 17:32:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 13:32:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205136] Review Request: gg2 - GNU Gadu 2 - free talking In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609151732.k8FHWpAp027299@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gg2 - GNU Gadu 2 - free talking https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205136 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-09-15 13:32 EST ------- Another issue. I doubt that the content of /usr/lib/pkgconfig/gg2_core.pc is proper. ------------------------------------------------------------ prefix=/usr exec_prefix=/usr libdir=/usr/lib includedir=/usr/include Name: libgg2_core Version: 2.2.9 Description: GNU Gadu 2 development Requires: glib-2.0 Libs: -L${libdir} -lgg2_core -L/lib -lglib-2.0 -pthread -L/lib -lgthread-2.0 -lglib-2.0 Cflags: -I${includedir} -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m32 -march=i386 -mtune=generic -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -pthread -Wall -Wno-uninitialized -Wchar-subscripts -Wnested-externs -W pointer-arith -Wno-sign-compare -I/usr/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/lib/glib-2.0/include -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE= 2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m32 -march=i386 -mtune=generic -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -pthread -Wall -Wno-uninitialized -Wchar-subscripts -Wnested-externs -Wpointer-arith -Wno-sign-compare -I/usr/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/li b/glib-2.0/include -D_REENTRANT -D_GNU_SOURCE -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -Wdeclaration-after-statement -I/usr/local/include -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -I/usr/include/gdbm -I/usr/lib/perl5/5.8.8/i386-linux-thread-multi/CORE ------------------------------------------------------------- * CFLAGS should be removed. * I cannot understand why Cflags includes '-I/usr/include/gdbm' (gdbm-devel is not installed by BuildRequires) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 15 17:50:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 13:50:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201000] Review Request: libFoundation - A free implementation of OpenStep's Foundation Kit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609151750.k8FHo5ol028525@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libFoundation - A free implementation of OpenStep's Foundation Kit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201000 toshio at tiki-lounge.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |toshio at tiki-lounge.com ------- Additional Comments From toshio at tiki-lounge.com 2006-09-15 13:50 EST ------- In addition to the simple pollution of /usr/include, since this is one possible implementation of part of the OpenStep specification, does it make sense to namespace things with some sort of upstream vendor directory? Or is it going to be an "official" implementation of OpenStep's FoundationKit on Linux? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 15 18:03:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 14:03:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205884] Review Request: perl-Email-Valid - Check validity of internet email address In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609151803.k8FI3YY9029537@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Email-Valid - Check validity of internet email address https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205884 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-09-15 14:03 EST ------- I grabbed a copy of the SRPM from: http://distro.ibiblio.org/pub/linux/distributions/aurora/scratch/spot-review/perl-Email-Valid-0.176-1.src.rpm and updated it with the above attached specfile. The result looks better. rpmlint says: W: perl-Email-Valid mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (no big deal; the errant tab is on the BuildRequireas: bind-utils line if you want to remove it). The only real issue I see is that you manually specify Requires: perl(Mail::Address) which is duplicated by RPM's automatic dependency generation and thus should be removed. Some tests are skipped; running with TEST_VERBOSE=1 shows this: ok 12 # skip your dns appears missing or failing to resolve ok 13 # skip your dns appears missing or failing to resolve This is due to building in mock with no DNS config. ok 14 # skip tests require Net::Domain::TLD 1.65 ok 15 # skip tests require Net::Domain::TLD 1.65 ok 16 # skip tests require Net::Domain::TLD 1.65 Net::Domain::TLD is not in the repo so this is unavoidable at this time. Review: * source files match upstream: c71a350965c97473af80edfa1bff0b63 Email-Valid-0.176.tar.gz * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * dist tag is present. * build root is correct. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. License text not included upstream. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * package installs properly * rpmlint is silent. X final provides and requires are sane: perl(Email::Valid) = 0.176 perl-Email-Valid = 0.176-2.fc6 = perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8) perl(Carp) perl(File::Spec) perl(IO::File) perl(Mail::Address) X perl(Mail::Address) perl(strict) perl(vars) * %check is present and all tests pass: 5/16 skipped: various reasons All tests successful, 5 subtests skipped. Files=3, Tests=18, 36 wallclock secs ( 0.18 cusr + 0.04 csys = 0.22 CPU) * package is not relocatable. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 15 18:04:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 14:04:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205885] Review Request: perl-CGI-Untaint-email - Validate an email address In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609151804.k8FI4xLl029710@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-CGI-Untaint-email - Validate an email address https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205885 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 15 18:11:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 14:11:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201000] Review Request: libFoundation - A free implementation of OpenStep's Foundation Kit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609151811.k8FIBRRK030114@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libFoundation - A free implementation of OpenStep's Foundation Kit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201000 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rdieter at math.unl.edu ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-09-15 14:11 EST ------- > since this is one possible > implementation of part of the OpenStep specification I *seriously* doubt we will ever see another implementation (at least in our lifetimes...) (; Let's not invent solutions for problems that don't (yet) exist. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 15 18:19:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 14:19:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206693] New: Review Request: KTechlab - Development and simulation of microcontrollers and electronic circuits Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206693 Summary: Review Request: KTechlab - Development and simulation of microcontrollers and electronic circuits Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cgoorah at yahoo.com.au QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://chitlesh.googlepages.com/ktechlab.spec SRPM URL: http://chitlesh.googlepages.com/ktechlab-0.3-1.src.rpm Description: KTechlab is a development and simulation environment for microcontrollers and electronic circuits, distributed under the GNU General Public License. KTechlab consists of several well-integrated components: A circuit simulator, capable of simulating logic, linear devices and some nonlinear devices. * Integration with gpsim, allowing PICs to be simulated in circuit. * A schematic editor, which provides a rich real-time feedback of the simulation. * A flowchart editor, allowing PIC programs to be constructed visually. * MicroBASIC; a BASIC-like compiler for PICs, written as a companion program to KTechlab. * An embedded Kate part, which provides a powerful editor for PIC programs. * Integrated assembler and disassembler via gpasm and gpdasm. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 15 18:25:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 14:25:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206693] Review Request: KTechlab - Development and simulation of microcontrollers and electronic circuits In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609151825.k8FIPC4j030991@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: KTechlab - Development and simulation of microcontrollers and electronic circuits https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206693 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2006-09-15 14:25 EST ------- Some examples at http://ktechlab.org/screenshots/ for testing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 15 18:29:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 14:29:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 194373] Review Request: kdeedu: Educational/Edutainment applications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609151829.k8FITG7F031217@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdeedu: Educational/Edutainment applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194373 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2006-09-15 14:29 EST ------- Ping ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 15 18:39:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 14:39:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205886] Review Request: perl-File-MMagic-XS - Guess file type with XS In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609151839.k8FIdSA4032003@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-File-MMagic-XS - Guess file type with XS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205886 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-09-15 14:39 EST ------- You're the license czar so if you feel comfortable importing this then I have no objections. * source files match upstream: b8ce9617527a999c85d54fc8a4e88ebc File-MMagic-XS-0.08.tar.gz * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * dist tag is present. * build root is correct. ? license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. License text not included upstream. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * compiler flags are appropriate. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * package installs properly * debuginfo package looks complete. * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: XS.so()(64bit) perl(File::MMagic::XS) = 0.08 perl-File-MMagic-XS = 0.08-2.fc6 = perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8) perl(File::MMagic) perl(strict) perl(vars) * %check is present and all tests pass: All tests successful. Files=2, Tests=11, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.06 cusr + 0.01 csys = 0.07 CPU) * no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. * package is not relocatable. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no libtool .la droppings. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 15 18:44:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 14:44:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191590] Review Request: fluidsynth-dssi - a FluidSynth DSSI plugin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609151844.k8FIiaWv032326@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fluidsynth-dssi - a FluidSynth DSSI plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191590 ------- Additional Comments From opensource at till.name 2006-09-15 14:44 EST ------- The .desktop file should be in a separate file and not inside the spec. You do not need: Requires(post): desktop-file-utils Requires(postun): desktop-file-utils make install DESTDIR="$RPM_BUILD_ROOT" instead of %makeinstall should work, so you must not use %makeinstall see: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-fcaf3e6fcbd51194a5d0dbcfbdd2fcb7791dd002 You do not package COPYING with contains the license. The license seems to be GPL but you wrote LGPL in the spec. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 15 18:46:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 14:46:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 194373] Review Request: kdeedu: Educational/Edutainment applications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609151846.k8FIk4A9032427@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdeedu: Educational/Edutainment applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194373 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-09-15 14:46 EST ------- ping what? the mostly harmless rpmlint warnings? I guess one thing worth fixing is to omit W: kdeedu non-executable-in-bin /usr/bin/pykig.pyo 0644 W: kdeedu non-executable-in-bin /usr/bin/pykig.pyc 0644 from packaging. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 15 19:13:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 15:13:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198836] Review Request: freetype1 compatibility FreeType 1.x In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609151913.k8FJDslp001976@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: freetype1 compatibility FreeType 1.x https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198836 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |nobody at fedoraproject.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 15 19:16:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 15:16:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205884] Review Request: perl-Email-Valid - Check validity of internet email address In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609151916.k8FJGhn5002426@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Email-Valid - Check validity of internet email address https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205884 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2006-09-15 15:16 EST ------- Built. Thanks for the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 15 19:16:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 15:16:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205885] Review Request: perl-CGI-Untaint-email - Validate an email address In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609151916.k8FJGvB8002475@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-CGI-Untaint-email - Validate an email address https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205885 Bug 205885 depends on bug 205884, which changed state. Bug 205884 Summary: Review Request: perl-Email-Valid - Check validity of internet email address https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205884 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |RAWHIDE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 15 19:54:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 15:54:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205885] Review Request: perl-CGI-Untaint-email - Validate an email address In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609151954.k8FJs0GF005627@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-CGI-Untaint-email - Validate an email address https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205885 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-09-15 15:53 EST ------- The only issue I see is that you have two manual Requires: that duplicate unversioned requires that rpmbuild figures out on its own: perl(Email::Valid) perl(Email::Valid) >= 0.13 perl(Mail::Address) perl(Mail::Address) >= 1.40 There's probably no point in the versioned Email::Valid require because it was just added to the repo and so there's no older version that might be installed. I don't know about perl(Mail::Address); it looks like the 1.58 came out in 2003, so I think we're pretty much covered there as well. I'd say just go ahead and remove the manual Requires: for those packages and check in. Or, if you really want, filter those two unversioned automatic dependencies and check in. It's up to you. Review: * source files match upstream: 78bb576e038ece67d183d8c3b3ad2165 CGI-Untaint-email-0.03.tar.gz * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * dist tag is present. * build root is correct. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. License text not included upstream. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * package installs properly * rpmlint is silent. X final provides and requires are sane: perl(CGI::Untaint::email) = 0.03 perl(Mail::Address::overload) perl-CGI-Untaint-email = 0.03-1.fc6 = perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8) perl(CGI::Untaint) >= 0.07 X perl(Email::Valid) perl(Email::Valid) >= 0.13 X perl(Mail::Address) perl(Mail::Address) >= 1.40 perl(base) perl(strict) perl(vars) * %check is present and all tests pass: All tests successful. Files=1, Tests=4, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.06 cusr + 0.01 csys = 0.07 CPU) * package is not relocatable. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. APPROVED, assuming you agree with me about the manual Requires: bits. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 15 20:02:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 16:02:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206707] New: Review Request: acerhk-kmod - Acer Hotkey driver Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206707 Summary: Review Request: acerhk-kmod - Acer Hotkey driver Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: grabka at gmail.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://student.agh.edu.pl/~grabka/acerhk/acerhk-kmod.spec SRPM URL: http://student.agh.edu.pl/~grabka/acerhk/acerhk-kmod-0.5.34-1.2.6.17_1.2174_FC5.src.rpm Description: This package contains the driver for managing special buttons and wireless antenna on Acer and compatible laptops. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 15 20:05:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 16:05:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206708] New: Review Request:
- Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206708 Summary: Review Request:
- Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: grabka at gmail.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://student.agh.edu.pl/~grabka/acerhk/acerhk.spec SRPM URL: http://student.agh.edu.pl/~grabka/acerhk/acerhk.spec Description: This package contains the driver for managing special buttons and wireless antenna on Acer and compatible laptops. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 15 20:06:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 16:06:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206708] Review Request: acerhk - Acer Hotkey driver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609152006.k8FK6s92006808@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: acerhk - Acer Hotkey driver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206708 grabka at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request:
- | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 15 21:54:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 17:54:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199780] Review Request: dstat In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609152154.k8FLsPKW013731@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dstat https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199780 toshio at tiki-lounge.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778, 177841 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From toshio at tiki-lounge.com 2006-09-15 17:54 EST ------- Congratulations! APPROVING -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 15 23:08:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 19:08:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206494] Review Request: ssss - Shamir's secret sharing scheme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609152308.k8FN8xrX016593@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ssss - Shamir's secret sharing scheme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206494 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 15 23:36:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 19:36:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205136] Review Request: gg2 - GNU Gadu 2 - free talking In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609152336.k8FNa5ng017662@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gg2 - GNU Gadu 2 - free talking https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205136 ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2006-09-15 19:36 EST ------- http://rpm.greysector.net/extras/gg2.spec - removed redundant build deps - removed .la dropping from -devel - made scripts in %%doc non-executable I don't know what to do about that .pc file. It's autogenerated. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 16 00:00:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 20:00:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205136] Review Request: gg2 - GNU Gadu 2 - free talking In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609160000.k8G00PPR018476@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gg2 - GNU Gadu 2 - free talking https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205136 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-09-15 20:00 EST ------- (In reply to comment #12) > I don't know what to do about that .pc file. It's autogenerated. Fix lib/gg2_core.pc.in. It is apparently incorrect. Perhaps you also have to fix configure.in. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 16 00:03:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 20:03:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206494] Review Request: ssss - Shamir's secret sharing scheme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609160003.k8G03QdF018583@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ssss - Shamir's secret sharing scheme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206494 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-09-15 20:03 EST ------- I understand why you can't use the makefile, but I don't understand "$RPM_OPT_FLAGS/%{optflags}" on the gcc command line. Surely you only need the "$RPM_OPT_FLAGS" bit. This is really the only blocker I see, so I'll go ahead and approve and you can fix it when you check in. Review: * source files match upstream: 24227252aa195a146d09de1df10357a1 ssss-0.5.tar.gz * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * dist tag is present. ? build root is correct. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. License text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * compiler flags are appropriate. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * package installs properly * debuginfo package looks complete. * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: ssss = 0.5-1.fc6 = libgmp.so.3()(64bit) * %check is not present; no test suite upstream. * no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. * package is not relocatable. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no libtool .la droppings. APPROVED, just fix the gcc command line. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 16 00:15:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 20:15:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193106] Review Request: gtkmozembedmm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609160015.k8G0FIcC018915@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtkmozembedmm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193106 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-09-15 20:15 EST ------- In reply to comment #4: 1. Yeah, the md5 is going to be diffrent because you change some files and copy them, which changes timestamps. Also, the autogen.sh run each time will have diffrent timestamps, so it's not going to match. Everything looks good with diff however, so I don't think thats a blocker. 2-4: ok. 5. I am getting failures in mock... fc6/i386 gives me: ./configure: line 19134: syntax error near unexpected token `5.6.0' ./configure: line 19134: `GLIBMM_CHECK_PERL(5.6.0)' error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.78710 (%build) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 16 00:24:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 20:24:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206398] Review Request: php-pecl-Fileinfo - libmagic bindings In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609160024.k8G0OfJ7019127@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pecl-Fileinfo - libmagic bindings https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206398 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 16 00:48:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 20:48:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205136] Review Request: gg2 - GNU Gadu 2 - free talking In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609160048.k8G0mqaQ019819@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gg2 - GNU Gadu 2 - free talking https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205136 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-09-15 20:48 EST ------- (In reply to comment #12) > http://rpm.greysector.net/extras/gg2.spec > > - removed redundant build deps Please readd dbus-glib-devel dependency for FC6-devel. %if %{fedora} > 5 BuildRequires: dbus-glib-devel %else BuildRequires: dbus-glib %endif I cannot build this package again on FC6-devel. checking for IceConnectionNumber in -lICE... (cached) no checking X11/extensions/scrnsaver.h usability... yes checking X11/extensions/scrnsaver.h presence... yes checking for X11/extensions/scrnsaver.h... yes checking for GTK... yes checking for DBUS... no configure: error: DBUS_PKG_ERRORS error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.20250 (%build) RPM build errors: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.20250 (%build) Error building package from gg2-2.2.9-5.fc6.src.rpm, See build log -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 16 01:48:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 21:48:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200630] Review Request: postgresql_autodoc - PostgreSQL AutoDoc Utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609160148.k8G1m34d021237@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: postgresql_autodoc - PostgreSQL AutoDoc Utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200630 ------- Additional Comments From toshio at tiki-lounge.com 2006-09-15 21:48 EST ------- As communicated on IRC, this looks good except for having to specify the password on the commandline. Can you poke upstream to see if they can provide a way to prompt for the password interactively? That's really the most secure way and since this isn't likely to be run from a cron job, it's probably the best way to handle it for this program. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 16 02:37:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 22:37:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205136] Review Request: gg2 - GNU Gadu 2 - free talking In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609160237.k8G2bKf9023086@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gg2 - GNU Gadu 2 - free talking https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205136 ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2006-09-15 22:37 EST ------- http://rpm.greysector.net/extras/gg2.spec http://rpm.greysector.net/extras/gg2-2.2.9-6.src.rpm - fix build on devel - patch .pc file not to include RPM_OPT_CFLAGS I've tested my fix of the .pc file. A sample plugin compiles fine. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 16 03:38:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 23:38:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201779] Review Request: xfsdump In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609160338.k8G3c90g026800@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xfsdump https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201779 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-09-15 23:37 EST ------- Is there some reason this package hasn't been built yet? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 16 03:59:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 23:59:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196101] Review Request: mimedefang In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609160359.k8G3xIkp028211@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mimedefang https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196101 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |tibbs at math.uh.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-09-15 23:59 EST ------- Unfortuantely I have no way to test this; I long ago dumped Sendmail for Exim. But I'll go ahead and review the form of the package and work from the assumption that you've done the necessary testing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 16 04:07:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Sep 2006 00:07:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205136] Review Request: gg2 - GNU Gadu 2 - free talking In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609160407.k8G47N2r028699@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gg2 - GNU Gadu 2 - free talking https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205136 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-09-16 00:07 EST ------- Well, .pc file is now correct. Then does -devel package really require perl? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 16 04:17:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Sep 2006 00:17:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205136] Review Request: gg2 - GNU Gadu 2 - free talking In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609160417.k8G4HpOX028950@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gg2 - GNU Gadu 2 - free talking https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205136 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-09-16 00:17 EST ------- Note: even if -devel package doesn't require perl, perl is anyway installed because main package requires perl. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 16 04:28:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Sep 2006 00:28:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196101] Review Request: mimedefang In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609160428.k8G4SJI1029189@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mimedefang https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196101 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-09-16 00:28 EST ------- There seems to be something resembling tests in the "tests" directory, but I don't see how you would actually run them. I think you actually have to set up the system with the test filter and then send the test messages through it, which wouldn't be doable in an rpm. It looks like RPM's automatic Perl dependency generation gets confused and comes up with duplicated dependencies for perl(Digest::SHA1) and perl(MIME::Tools) with different versioning requirements. Unfortunately these will need to be filtered. Review: * source files match upstream: e55b22dda54c4a3b52e1fbeb9135b0cf mimedefang-2.57.tar.gz * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * dist tag is present. * build root is correct. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. License text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * compiler flags are appropriate. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * package installs properly * debuginfo package looks complete. * rpmlint has only ignorable errors. X final provides and requires are sane: config(mimedefang) = 2.57-3.fc6 mimedefang = 2.57-3.fc6 = /bin/bash /bin/sh /sbin/chkconfig /sbin/service /usr/bin/perl /usr/sbin/useradd config(mimedefang) = 2.57-3.fc6 libperl.so()(64bit) perl >= 0:5.001 X perl(Digest::SHA1) perl(Digest::SHA1) >= 2.00 perl(Getopt::Std) perl(IO::Handle) perl(IO::Select) perl(IO::Socket) perl(IO::Stringy) >= 1.212 perl(MIME::Base64) >= 3.03 perl(MIME::Parser) X perl(MIME::Tools) >= 5.410 perl(MIME::Tools) >= 5.413 perl(MIME::Words) perl(Mail::SpamAssassin) >= 1.6 perl(POSIX) perl(Socket) perl(Sys::Hostname) perl(Sys::Syslog) perl(Time::Local) perl(lib) perl(strict) perl(vars) perl(warnings) perl-MailTools >= 1.15 sendmail-cf >= 8.12.0 * %check is not present; running test suite not feasible within rpmbuild. * no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. * package is not relocatable. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * scriptlets are OK (adding a service and controlling the daemon) * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no libtool .la droppings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 16 04:29:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Sep 2006 00:29:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196570] Review Request: mirage In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609160429.k8G4TPZ5029225@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mirage https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196570 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-09-16 00:29 EST ------- Given your recent announcement, do you still wish to continue with the submission of this package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 16 05:41:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Sep 2006 01:41:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206693] Review Request: KTechlab - Development and simulation of microcontrollers and electronic circuits In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609160541.k8G5f4uH031216@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: KTechlab - Development and simulation of microcontrollers and electronic circuits https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206693 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2006-09-16 01:41 EST ------- Some remarks: 1. I don't understand, why you - BR: autoconf It's not required. Building the package invokes autoheader due to a bug somewhere in the source tarball, nevertheless this invocation of autoheader does nothing. - BR: libtool No idea why you do this. - R: gpsim The package doesn't directly depend on gpsim. It depends on the libs from gpsim, which are automatically being pulled in by rpm. - R: gputils I don't see any dependency on this package. 2. The tarball is mal-packaged. It ships an autom4te.cache/. I'd suggest to rm -rf autom4te.cache in %prep. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 16 06:09:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Sep 2006 02:09:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206693] Review Request: KTechlab - Development and simulation of microcontrollers and electronic circuits In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609160609.k8G69LDP031850@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: KTechlab - Development and simulation of microcontrollers and electronic circuits https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206693 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 16 06:24:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Sep 2006 02:24:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206492] Review Request: ssss - Shamir's secret sharing scheme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609160624.k8G6OOXo032189@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ssss - Shamir's secret sharing scheme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206492 paul at xtdnet.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE ------- Additional Comments From paul at xtdnet.nl 2006-09-16 02:24 EST ------- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 206494 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 16 06:24:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Sep 2006 02:24:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206494] Review Request: ssss - Shamir's secret sharing scheme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609160624.k8G6OZ7e032204@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ssss - Shamir's secret sharing scheme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206494 ------- Additional Comments From paul at xtdnet.nl 2006-09-16 02:24 EST ------- *** Bug 206492 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 16 06:26:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Sep 2006 02:26:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206494] Review Request: ssss - Shamir's secret sharing scheme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609160626.k8G6QUnx032296@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ssss - Shamir's secret sharing scheme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206494 ------- Additional Comments From paul at xtdnet.nl 2006-09-16 02:26 EST ------- Thanks. It was already fixed in 0.5.0-2. Unfortunately, upon my first submission, bugzilla timed out and I submitted again. Turned out both bugs made it, and my comments were in the other one. Thanks for the review and approval -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 16 06:38:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Sep 2006 02:38:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206494] Review Request: ssss - Shamir's secret sharing scheme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609160638.k8G6cETO000350@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ssss - Shamir's secret sharing scheme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206494 paul at xtdnet.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 16 06:51:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Sep 2006 02:51:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206693] Review Request: KTechlab - Development and simulation of microcontrollers and electronic circuits In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609160651.k8G6pfMR000630@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: KTechlab - Development and simulation of microcontrollers and electronic circuits https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206693 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-09-16 02:51 EST ------- Ralf, thank you for adding some remarks: Well, I will review this package. 1. From http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines : * Requires - Explain why this package requires gputils, gpsim. * BuildRequires - libtool, autoconf is not necessary, perhaps. * Scriptlets requirements - According to http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets , Requires(post): desktop-file-utils Requires(postun): desktop-file-utils should be removed. * File and Directory Ownership - The following directries are not owned. /usr/share/config.kcfg/ 2. From http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines : = Nothing. 3. Other things I have noticed: ? Well, I would appreciate it when someone would check if this package can be build on x86_64 as this uses qt-devel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 16 06:54:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Sep 2006 02:54:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206693] Review Request: KTechlab - Development and simulation of microcontrollers and electronic circuits In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609160654.k8G6sPrE000717@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: KTechlab - Development and simulation of microcontrollers and electronic circuits https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206693 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-09-16 02:54 EST ------- Also, check if gettext is requires as BuildRequires. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 16 07:58:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Sep 2006 03:58:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206693] Review Request: KTechlab - Development and simulation of microcontrollers and electronic circuits In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609160758.k8G7wOV3002692@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: KTechlab - Development and simulation of microcontrollers and electronic circuits https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206693 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-09-16 03:58 EST ------- Ah, also ldconfig on %post, %postun is not required. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 16 10:32:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Sep 2006 06:32:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196101] Review Request: mimedefang In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609161032.k8GAWiMi012289@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mimedefang https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196101 redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|Package Review |915resolution ------- Additional Comments From redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de 2006-09-16 06:32 EST ------- Well, I think removing the versionified requirement to perl(Digest::SHA1) would be the best as the first official perl-Digest-SHA1 package ever build for a Red Hat Linux system was 2.00 and it was build in 2002 when 2.00 appeared in 1998. Same applies to my own versionified requirement to perl(MIME::Tools), which is originally taken from the README file, but I absolutely can't see any problem when running it using perl(MIME::Tools) 5.410 which seems to be required as the minimum requirement by the code, too. Removing these two added-by-hand requirements fits to me, is this acceptable? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 16 10:32:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Sep 2006 06:32:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206761] New: Review Request: kadu-theme - themes for Kadu Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206761 Summary: Review Request: kadu-theme - themes for Kadu Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mr.ecik at gmail.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://ecik.zspswidwin.pl/kadu/kadu-theme.spec SRPM URL: http://ecik.zspswidwin.pl/kadu/kadu-theme-0.5.0-1.src.rpm Description: Set of themes for Kadu. Previously, these themes was included into main Kadu spec, but I decided to split them out. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 16 10:42:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Sep 2006 06:42:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204416] Review Request: libtelepathy - library to ease writing of telepathy clients In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609161042.k8GAgTrb012930@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libtelepathy - library to ease writing of telepathy clients https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204416 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 16 10:43:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Sep 2006 06:43:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204416] Review Request: libtelepathy - library to ease writing of telepathy clients In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609161043.k8GAha8E013058@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libtelepathy - library to ease writing of telepathy clients https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204416 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-09-16 06:43 EST ------- I will review this later. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 16 10:58:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Sep 2006 06:58:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205912] Review Request: Thunar - Thunar File Manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609161058.k8GAwTQ3013759@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Thunar - Thunar File Manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205912 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-09-15 21:12 EST ------- ok, new version: * Fri Sep 15 2006 Kevin Fenzi - 0.4.0-0.4.rc1 - Added Requires: exo-devel >= 0.3.1.10 to devel. - exclude docs moved from datadir to docs - Fixed datdir including files twice Spec: http://www.scrye.com/~kevin/extras/Thunar/Thunar.spec Srpm: http://www.scrye.com/~kevin/extras/Thunar/Thunar-0.4.0-0.4.rc1.fc6.src.rpm ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-09-16 06:58 EST ------- There is still an issue, in %files %{_datadir}/Thunar/sendto/thunar-sendto-email.desktop is listed twice... Otherwise * rpmlint is silent * free software licence, included * named according to guidelines * follow packaging guidelines * specfile legible * sane provides Provides: config(Thunar) = 0.4.0-0.4.rc1 libthunar-vfs-1.so.2 libthunarx-1.so.2 thunar-apr.so thunar-sbr.so thunar-uca.so * source match upstream b07ae97a69964112e0af84ba2f63585d Thunar-0.4.0rc1.tar.bz2 * libs packaged correctly * docs not used at runtime * desktop files present and following guidelines * build and work in devel * own all directories * no file included twice * %files right except for a typo APPROVED if you fix the file included twice. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 16 11:08:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Sep 2006 07:08:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204416] Review Request: libtelepathy - library to ease writing of telepathy clients In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609161108.k8GB8rk3014394@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libtelepathy - library to ease writing of telepathy clients https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204416 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-09-16 07:08 EST ------- Before checking 0.0.37-1 : I cannot rebuild this on FC5. DEBUG: Executing /usr/sbin/mock-helper chroot /var/lib/mock/fedora-5-i386-core/root /sbin/runuser - root -c "/sbin/runuser -c 'rpmbuild -bs --target i386 --nodeps /builddir/build/SPECS/libtelepathy.spec' mockbuild" warning: Could not canonicalize hostname: halo.mtk.ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Building target platforms: i386 Building for target i386 Wrote: /builddir/build/SRPMS/libtelepathy-0.0.37-1.fc5.src.rpm DEBUG: ensuring dir /var/lib/mock/fedora-5-i386-core/root/proc DEBUG: mounting proc in /var/lib/mock/fedora-5-i386-core/root/proc DEBUG: Executing /usr/sbin/mock-helper mount -t proc proc /var/lib/mock/fedora-5-i386-core/root/proc mount: proc already mounted or /var/lib/mock/fedora-5-i386-core/root/proc busy mount: according to mtab, proc is mounted on /proc DEBUG: ensuring dir /var/lib/mock/fedora-5-i386-core/root/dev/pts DEBUG: mounting devpts in /var/lib/mock/fedora-5-i386-core/root/dev/pts DEBUG: Executing /usr/sbin/mock-helper mount -t devpts devpts /var/lib/mock/fedora-5-i386-core/root/dev/pts mount: devpts already mounted or /var/lib/mock/fedora-5-i386-core/root/dev/pts busy mount: according to mtab, devpts is mounted on /dev/pts DEBUG: yum: command /usr/sbin/mock-helper yum --installroot /var/lib/mock/fedora-5-i386-core/root resolvedep 'dbus-devel' 'dbus-glib-devel' DEBUG: Executing /usr/sbin/mock-helper yum --installroot /var/lib/mock/fedora-5-i386-core/root resolvedep 'dbus-devel' 'dbus-glib-devel' No Package Found for dbus-glib-devel 0:dbus-devel-0.61-3.fc5.1.i386 Cannot find build req dbus-glib-devel. Exiting. ending DEBUG: Executing /usr/sbin/mock-helper umount /var/lib/mock/fedora-5-i386-core/root/proc DEBUG: Executing /usr/sbin/mock-helper umount /var/lib/mock/fedora-5-i386-core/root/dev/pts done See the argument on bug 206576 (this bug is marked as DEFERRED) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 16 12:59:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Sep 2006 08:59:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204416] Review Request: libtelepathy - library to ease writing of telepathy clients In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609161259.k8GCxkt7021315@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libtelepathy - library to ease writing of telepathy clients https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204416 ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at ameritech.net 2006-09-16 08:59 EST ------- Build this under FC6. The spec isn't set-up for FC5, which will require dbus-glib-devel to be changed to dbus-glib. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 16 13:08:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Sep 2006 09:08:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204416] Review Request: libtelepathy - library to ease writing of telepathy clients In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609161308.k8GD8TDk022108@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libtelepathy - library to ease writing of telepathy clients https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204416 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-09-16 09:08 EST ------- (In reply to comment #6) > Build this under FC6. The spec isn't set-up for FC5, which will require > dbus-glib-devel to be changed to dbus-glib. I mean that this spec file requires a "switch" to be built under both FC6-devel and FC5. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 16 13:21:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Sep 2006 09:21:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204416] Review Request: libtelepathy - library to ease writing of telepathy clients In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609161321.k8GDLs0R022597@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libtelepathy - library to ease writing of telepathy clients https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204416 ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at ameritech.net 2006-09-16 09:21 EST ------- I'm not really planning on targetting FC5 at the moment, and if so will modify the FC5 branch, and not use a switch. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 16 13:47:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Sep 2006 09:47:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196101] Review Request: mimedefang In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609161347.k8GDl0lE023302@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mimedefang https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196101 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|915resolution |Package Review OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-09-16 09:46 EST ------- Sure, that's the simplest thing to do. Since that's the only issue and the fix is trivial, I'll go ahead and approve and you can just take them out before you check in. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 16 14:03:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Sep 2006 10:03:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206494] Review Request: ssss - Shamir's secret sharing scheme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609161403.k8GE3DWA023742@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ssss - Shamir's secret sharing scheme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206494 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-09-16 10:03 EST ------- Oh, I apologize for not seeing that other ticket. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 16 14:13:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Sep 2006 10:13:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204416] Review Request: libtelepathy - library to ease writing of telepathy clients In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609161413.k8GEDtwW024066@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libtelepathy - library to ease writing of telepathy clients https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204416 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-09-16 10:13 EST ------- 1. From http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines : * Use rpmlint - rpmlint is not silent. W: libtelepathy mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs Well, unify space/tab. For this case, don't use tabs in spec file. sed -i -e 's|\t| |g' foo.spec is the most simple way to remove tabs. W: libtelepathy-devel no-documentation (I think this can be ignored.) 2. From http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines = Nothing. 3. Other things I have noticed: = Nothing. Fix space/tab issue on spec file. However, I cannot find any problem aside this. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- This package (libtelepathy) is APPROVED by me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 16 15:16:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Sep 2006 11:16:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202901] Review Request: pgFouine - PostgreSQL log analyzer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609161516.k8GFGHpN025779@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pgFouine - PostgreSQL log analyzer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202901 ------- Additional Comments From toshio at tiki-lounge.com 2006-09-16 11:16 EST ------- MD5Sums 09cccc6978d9e953fb9a12487d75455d pgfouine-0.7-4.src.rpm ad2b56340581758fbda051abdc340d71 pgfouine.spec c6b09d495fd11e0b8e9b4b86e4252449 pgfouine-0.7-include_path.patch 4ad02f17d9da3789e548bac77fd2f2a5 pgfouine-0.7.tar.gz Blockers: * Macros are used everywhere except in the patch file. As long as the patch defines "/usr/share/..." explicitly, the sed line in the spec file won't accomplish anything. If the patch instead defines it as @INCLUDEPATH@ then the sed substitution will change @INCLUDEPATH@ into whatever the datadir is. Eventually, the upstream build script can do the substitution itself based on what the value of an ENVIRNMENT VARIABLE or define passed to make. Fixed: * Source matches upstream tarball now. One thing to remember is that you should be slightly paranoid as a packager. The software that you package is going to be installed on a lot of end-user machines. If someone says they are upstream and sends you a tarball you should still check it against the tarball on the upstream site, compare to upstream gpg signatures or MD5Sums, check against tarballs in packages from other distributions, or etc. You only have a reviewer checking MD5Sums while the package is being submitted. Once it is in the repository it is up to you to ensure that the package continues to contain the source from upstream. * INSTALL has been removed and ChangeLog added. * Tests have been removed from the binary package. * buildroot check was removed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 16 15:49:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Sep 2006 11:49:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202901] Review Request: pgFouine - PostgreSQL log analyzer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609161549.k8GFntP2027038@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pgFouine - PostgreSQL log analyzer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202901 ------- Additional Comments From guillaume.smet at gmail.com 2006-09-16 11:49 EST ------- Toshio, > * Macros are used everywhere except in the patch file. It was fixed in upstream. I think the problem occured when Devrim rebuilt the package (it was OK in the src.rpm I have here). The current patch in CVS contains @INCLUDEPATH@ so that the sed replacement works. He's on vacation at the moment. I'll ask him to build a new RPM as soon as he's back home. Thanks for the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 16 15:57:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Sep 2006 11:57:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 185845] Review Request: rpld - RPL/RIPL remote boot daemon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609161557.k8GFv5oO027267@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rpld - RPL/RIPL remote boot daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=185845 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-09-16 11:57 EST ------- Sorry for taking so long to get back to this. The compiler is still not being called properly; I'm just seeing: gcc -O -c -o protocol.o protocol.c I was able to get this to work by changing the makefile patch to the one I'll attach, and duplicating the call to make in %build. For some reason the package wants make to be called twice; the second invocation actually builds the software. Before, everything was being built in %install. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 16 15:58:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Sep 2006 11:58:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 185845] Review Request: rpld - RPL/RIPL remote boot daemon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609161558.k8GFw8n7027309@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rpld - RPL/RIPL remote boot daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=185845 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-09-16 11:57 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=136435) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=136435&action=view) Replacement patch which doesn't override OPT. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 16 16:57:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Sep 2006 12:57:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 185845] Review Request: rpld - RPL/RIPL remote boot daemon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609161657.k8GGvw1l031015@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rpld - RPL/RIPL remote boot daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=185845 opensource at till.name changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |opensource at till.name ------- Additional Comments From opensource at till.name 2006-09-16 12:57 EST ------- You should use macros here (%{_sbindir} and %{_mandir}): mkdir -p $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/usr/{sbin,share/man/man{8,5}} -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 16 17:10:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Sep 2006 13:10:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205537] Review Request: perl-Test-Object - Thoroughly testing objects via registered handlers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609161710.k8GHAbVu031509@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-Object - Thoroughly testing objects via registered handlers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205537 ------- Additional Comments From jpo at di.uminho.pt 2006-09-16 13:10 EST ------- Still no news from upstream. I have just requested the FC-5 branch creation as it built correctly in devel (with a Nakefile.PL patch) and the PPI update also passed all its tests. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 16 18:05:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Sep 2006 14:05:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204416] Review Request: libtelepathy - library to ease writing of telepathy clients In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609161805.k8GI5lNJ001301@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libtelepathy - library to ease writing of telepathy clients https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204416 bdpepple at ameritech.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 16 18:16:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Sep 2006 14:16:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196101] Review Request: mimedefang In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609161816.k8GIGGPJ001629@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mimedefang https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196101 redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de 2006-09-16 14:16 EST ------- 17722 (mimedefang): Build on target fedora-development-extras succeeded. 17723 (mimedefang): Build on target fedora-5-extras succeeded. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 16 18:20:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Sep 2006 14:20:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205537] Review Request: perl-Test-Object - Thoroughly testing objects via registered handlers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609161820.k8GIKKw0001744@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-Object - Thoroughly testing objects via registered handlers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205537 jpo at di.uminho.pt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From jpo at di.uminho.pt 2006-09-16 14:20 EST ------- Built for FC-5 and devel (perl-PPI-1.117-1 also built correctly for FC-5 and devel). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 16 18:28:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Sep 2006 14:28:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206761] Review Request: kadu-theme - themes for Kadu In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609161828.k8GISHM1002011@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kadu-theme - themes for Kadu https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206761 rpm at greysector.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |rpm at greysector.net OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2006-09-16 14:28 EST ------- I'll take this review. Where does the version number come from? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 16 19:05:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Sep 2006 15:05:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206761] Review Request: kadu-theme - themes for Kadu In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609161905.k8GJ5g62003426@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kadu-theme - themes for Kadu https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206761 ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2006-09-16 15:05 EST ------- 1. package meets naming and packaging guidelines, but the origin of the version number isn't clear, please explain. 2. specfile is properly named, is cleanly written but doesn't use macros consistently: %define _themesdir /usr/share/kadu/themes You should use %{_datadir} here. And since you never seem to use %{_themesdir} without /icons, why not %define _kaduiconsdir %{_datadir}/kadu/themes/icons ? 3. dist tag is present. 4. build root is correct. %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) 5. can't verify if license field matches the actual license. * Crystal theme is - according to README - based on Crystal SVG icons from everaldo.com, but I can't find any license info there except: http://www.everaldo.com/legal.html , which is definitely NOT open-source compatible. It's used in KDE though, so I imagine this is open-source licensed, but still requires an explanation (maybe README.Fedora?) * Glass theme has NO license information inside the tarballs * Nuvola theme is LGPL according to Copyright, but full license text is NOT included (and at least that Copyright file should be in %files) 6. source files match upstream: 023085edabaf6a1b844fe6b5fc9315f9 kadu-theme-crystal-16.tar.bz2 57852ff3d3fd0063a642fcc173f7fa29 kadu-theme-crystal-22.tar.bz2 c3beb753222b96dad46f3adf230eb3e1 kadu-theme-glass_16.tar.gz 9ee70ca873fd0f22b2b83be133964d89 kadu-theme-glass_22.tar.gz 586cc6ff9ba62f0fdd7c7c1adf229efb kadu-theme-nuvola-16.tar.gz 7a17b4881141b346c6268ef25c284613 kadu-theme-nuvola-22.tar.gz 7. latest version is being packaged. 8. BuildRequires are proper. 9. didn't check if package builds in mock. 10. rpmlint is more or less silent: W: kadu-theme-crystal16 no-documentation W: kadu-theme-crystal22 no-documentation W: kadu-theme-glass16 no-documentation W: kadu-theme-glass22 no-documentation W: kadu-theme-nuvola16 no-documentation W: kadu-theme-nuvola22 no-documentation 11. final provides and requires are sane: kadu-theme-crystal16 = 0.5.0-1 = kadu kadu-theme-crystal22 = 0.5.0-1 = kadu kadu-theme-glass16 = 0.5.0-1 = kadu kadu-theme-glass22 = 0.5.0-1 = kadu kadu-theme-nuvola16 = 0.5.0-1 = kadu kadu-theme-nuvola22 = 0.5.0-1 = kadu 12. no shared libraries are present. 13. package is not relocatable. 14. owns the directories it creates. 15. doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. 16. no duplicates in %files. 17. file permissions are appropriate. 18. %clean is present. 19. %check is absent and no test suite. 20. no scriptlets present. 21. permitted content. 22. documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. 23. %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. 24. no headers. 25. no pkgconfig files. 26. no libtool .la droppings. 27. not a GUI app in itself, so doesn't require a .desktop entry 28. not a web app. 1. and 2. are easily fixable, so I'm mostly concerned with 5. Please contact upstream about this. If this is split from an already accepted package, I wonder why this wasn't caught before... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 16 20:25:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Sep 2006 16:25:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188400] Review Request: ssmtp In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609162025.k8GKPs58005837@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ssmtp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188400 michael at knox.net.nz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|michael at knox.net.nz |nobody at fedoraproject.org OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From michael at knox.net.nz 2006-09-16 16:25 EST ------- Sorry. Due to my stepping out for a while, I am unable to complete this review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 16 20:27:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Sep 2006 16:27:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189188] Review Request: sqlgrey - postfix grey-listing policy service In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609162027.k8GKRJHS005988@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sqlgrey - postfix grey-listing policy service https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189188 michael at knox.net.nz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|michael at knox.net.nz |nobody at fedoraproject.org OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From michael at knox.net.nz 2006-09-16 16:27 EST ------- Sorry. Due to my stepping out for a while, I am unable to complete this review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 16 20:28:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Sep 2006 16:28:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 195486] Review Request: kdenetwork: K Desktop Environment - Network Applications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609162028.k8GKSXke006059@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdenetwork: K Desktop Environment - Network Applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195486 michael at knox.net.nz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|michael at knox.net.nz |nobody at fedoraproject.org ------- Additional Comments From michael at knox.net.nz 2006-09-16 16:28 EST ------- Sorry. Due to my stepping out for a while, I am unable to complete this review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 16 20:29:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Sep 2006 16:29:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196434] Review Request: ren In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609162029.k8GKThgS006094@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ren https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196434 michael at knox.net.nz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|michael at knox.net.nz |nobody at fedoraproject.org ------- Additional Comments From michael at knox.net.nz 2006-09-16 16:29 EST ------- Sorry. Due to my stepping out for a while, I am unable to complete this review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 16 20:30:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Sep 2006 16:30:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197765] Review Request: libical - A library for parsing iCal component In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609162030.k8GKUiaq006169@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libical - A library for parsing iCal component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197765 michael at knox.net.nz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|michael at knox.net.nz |nobody at fedoraproject.org OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From michael at knox.net.nz 2006-09-16 16:30 EST ------- Sorry. Due to my stepping out for a while, I am unable to complete this review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 16 20:33:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Sep 2006 16:33:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200665] Review Request: ltris In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609162033.k8GKXA2n006303@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ltris https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200665 michael at knox.net.nz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG ------- Additional Comments From michael at knox.net.nz 2006-09-16 16:32 EST ------- Sorry. Due to my stepping out for a while, I am unable to complete this submission. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 16 20:34:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Sep 2006 16:34:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200665] Review Request: ltris In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609162034.k8GKY43v006361@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ltris https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200665 michael at knox.net.nz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 16 20:35:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Sep 2006 16:35:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196570] Review Request: mirage In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609162035.k8GKZRO0006448@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mirage https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196570 michael at knox.net.nz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG OtherBugsDependingO|163776 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From michael at knox.net.nz 2006-09-16 16:35 EST ------- Sorry. Due to my stepping out for a while, I am unable to complete this submission. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 16 20:37:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Sep 2006 16:37:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197198] Review Request: ntop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609162037.k8GKbYpA006599@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ntop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197198 michael at knox.net.nz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG OtherBugsDependingO|163778 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From michael at knox.net.nz 2006-09-16 16:37 EST ------- Sorry. Due to my stepping out for a while, I am unable to complete this submission. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 16 20:39:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Sep 2006 16:39:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189188] Review Request: sqlgrey - postfix grey-listing policy service In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609162039.k8GKdh0K006718@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sqlgrey - postfix grey-listing policy service https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189188 michael at knox.net.nz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163779 |163776 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 16 20:41:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Sep 2006 16:41:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191590] Review Request: fluidsynth-dssi - a FluidSynth DSSI plugin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609162041.k8GKfNc3006794@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fluidsynth-dssi - a FluidSynth DSSI plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191590 ------- Additional Comments From green at redhat.com 2006-09-16 16:41 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > The .desktop file should be in a separate file and not inside the spec. I decided to delete the .desktop file, as well as the fluidsynth-dssi binary, since it is redundant. FE already has many other ways to run fluidsynth (qsynth, etC). > make install DESTDIR="$RPM_BUILD_ROOT" > instead of %makeinstall should work, so you must not use %makeinstall Fixed. > You do not package COPYING with contains the license. Fixed. > The license seems to be GPL but you wrote LGPL in the spec. Fixed. Updated bits here: Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/green/FE/FC5/fluidsynth-dssi.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/green/FE/FC5/fluidsynth-dssi-0.9.1-4.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 16 20:42:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Sep 2006 16:42:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191590] Review Request: fluidsynth-dssi - a FluidSynth DSSI plugin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609162042.k8GKgM3H006830@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fluidsynth-dssi - a FluidSynth DSSI plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191590 green at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|189886, 189891 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 16 20:42:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Sep 2006 16:42:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189886] Review Request: FluidSynth - Real-time software synthesizer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609162042.k8GKgYAK006861@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: FluidSynth - Real-time software synthesizer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189886 green at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn|191590 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 16 20:42:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Sep 2006 16:42:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189891] Review Request: liblo - Open Sound Control library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609162042.k8GKgk1Z006895@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: liblo - Open Sound Control library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189891 green at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn|191590 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 16 20:48:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Sep 2006 16:48:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206761] Review Request: kadu-theme - themes for Kadu In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609162048.k8GKmke8007037@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kadu-theme - themes for Kadu https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206761 ------- Additional Comments From mr.ecik at gmail.com 2006-09-16 16:48 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > 1. package meets naming and packaging guidelines, but the origin of the > version number isn't clear, please explain. Previously, themes was included into main package and they have to get bigger version release (for example, in repo is available kadu-theme-crystal22-0.5.0-20060808svn) > 2. specfile is properly named, is cleanly written but doesn't use macros > consistently: > %define _themesdir /usr/share/kadu/themes > You should use %{_datadir} here. And since you never seem to use %{_themesdir} > without /icons, why not > %define _kaduiconsdir %{_datadir}/kadu/themes/icons ? %{_datadir} issue is fixed. I don't use kaduiconsdir macro, because I assume that there will be another themes than only icons, in future. > 5. can't verify if license field matches the actual license. > * Crystal theme is - according to README - based on Crystal SVG icons from > everaldo.com, but I can't find any license info there except: > http://www.everaldo.com/legal.html , which is definitely NOT open-source > compatible. It's used in KDE though, so I imagine this is open-source licensed, I have noticed legal section on www.evaraldo.com is not open-source compatible, but the actual icons license I found here: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:Crystal_Clear_action_1downarrow.png > * Glass theme has NO license information inside the tarballs Glass license is written down here: http://www.kadu.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=6815&highlight=glass > * Nuvola theme is LGPL according to Copyright, but full license text is NOT > included (and at least that Copyright file should be in %files) I have included all licenses in %doc. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 16 20:49:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Sep 2006 16:49:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206761] Review Request: kadu-theme - themes for Kadu In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609162049.k8GKnwPp007070@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kadu-theme - themes for Kadu https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206761 ------- Additional Comments From mr.ecik at gmail.com 2006-09-16 16:49 EST ------- SPEC file: http://ecik.zspswidwin.pl/kadu/kadu-theme.spec SRPM file: http://ecik.zspswidwin.pl/kadu/kadu-theme-0.5.0-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 16 21:00:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Sep 2006 17:00:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190029] Review Request: whysynth-dssi - DSSI software synthesizer plugin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609162100.k8GL0ORE007333@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: whysynth-dssi - DSSI software synthesizer plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190029 ------- Additional Comments From green at redhat.com 2006-09-16 17:00 EST ------- (In reply to comment #9) > You should not convert the icon in your spec file. Ok, fixed: Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/green/FE/FC5/whysynth-dssi.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/green/FE/FC5/whysynth-dssi-20060122-6.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 16 21:59:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Sep 2006 17:59:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206761] Review Request: kadu-theme - themes for Kadu In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609162159.k8GLxmGq009542@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kadu-theme - themes for Kadu https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206761 ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2006-09-16 17:59 EST ------- This is a more authoritative information source for Crystal's LGPL-ness, I'd say: http://www.kde-look.org/content/show.php?content=8341 Please contact upstream about missing license files! APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 16 22:00:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Sep 2006 18:00:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206761] Review Request: kadu-theme - themes for Kadu In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609162200.k8GM07xP009583@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kadu-theme - themes for Kadu https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206761 rpm at greysector.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 16 22:42:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Sep 2006 18:42:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206814] New: Review Request: hugin - Frontend for Panorama Tools, similar to PTAssembler, PTGui or Open for Windows Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206814 Summary: Review Request: hugin - Frontend for Panorama Tools, similar to PTAssembler, PTGui or Open for Windows Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: bruno at postle.net QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://bugbear.blackfish.org.uk/~bruno/apt/SPECS/hugin.spec SRPM URL: http://bugbear.blackfish.org.uk/~bruno/apt/fedora/linux/5/x86_64/SRPMS.panorama/hugin-0.6.1-2.fc5.src.rpm Description: hugin can be used to stitch multiple images together. The resulting image can span 360 degrees. Another common use is the creation of very high resolution pictures by combining multiple images. It uses the Panorama Tools as backend to create high quality images Note that this spec file doesn't use the %find_lang macro. I just can't get it to work, so there must be something I'm not doing right. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 16 22:50:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Sep 2006 18:50:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191590] Review Request: fluidsynth-dssi - a FluidSynth DSSI plugin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609162250.k8GMo8rR011168@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fluidsynth-dssi - a FluidSynth DSSI plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191590 opensource at till.name changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |opensource at till.name OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From opensource at till.name 2006-09-16 18:49 EST ------- BuildRequires: alsa-lib-devel liblo-devel ladspa-devel is not needed since dssi-devel already depends on them and is in BuildRequires rpmlint: ok naming: ok packaging guidelines: ok license: ok sources: ok 06bce40ec6c86545d0587e9364bba116 fluidsynth-dssi-0.9.1.tar.gz 06bce40ec6c86545d0587e9364bba116 fluidsynth-dssi-0.9.1.tar.gz.1 files and directories: ok mock build: ok Change the buildrequires and the package is APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 16 22:55:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Sep 2006 18:55:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191590] Review Request: fluidsynth-dssi - a FluidSynth DSSI plugin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609162255.k8GMtIFu011387@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fluidsynth-dssi - a FluidSynth DSSI plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191590 opensource at till.name changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 16 22:59:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Sep 2006 18:59:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206816] New: Review Request: freedoom-freedm - Deathmatch levels for freedoom Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206816 Summary: Review Request: freedoom-freedm - Deathmatch levels for freedoom Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: wart at kobold.org QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.kobold.org/~wart/fedora/freedoom-freedm.spec SRPM URL: http://www.kobold.org/~wart/fedora/freedoom-freedm-0.5-1.src.rpm Description: Multiplayer deathmatch levels for freedoom -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 16 23:05:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Sep 2006 19:05:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203662] Review Request: dx - Open source version of IBM's Visualization Data Explorer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609162305.k8GN5TNG011659@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dx - Open source version of IBM's Visualization Data Explorer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203662 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-09-16 19:05 EST ------- Review: builds fine in mock, rpmlint doesn't like the packages but on this occasion, the errors can be ignored Software installs and works Good consistent use of macros in US-English, UTF-8 License valid upstream and source tarballs have same md5 correct use of dist uses smp_mflags contains docs contains clean no ownership problems devel package doesn't need pkgconfig no dupes in the rpms Needs work %configure \ --disable-static \ --enable-shared \ --with-jni-path=%{java_home}/include \ --without-javadx \ --disable-dependency-tracking \ --enable-smp-linux \ --enable-new-keylayout \ --with-rsh=%{_bindir}/ssh \ Trailing \ on the end should not be there. If you remove this, I'm happy to approve the package as is. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 16 23:11:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Sep 2006 19:11:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206818] New: Review Request: perl-MARC-Record - Object-oriented abstraction of MARC record handling Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206818 Summary: Review Request: perl-MARC-Record - Object-oriented abstraction of MARC record handling Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jpo at di.uminho.pt QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: ftp://perl.di.uminho.pt/pub/fedora/perl-MARC-Record.spec SRPM URL: ftp://perl.di.uminho.pt/pub/fedora/perl-MARC-Record-1.38-1.src.rpm Description: The MARC::* series of modules create a simple object-oriented abstraction of MARC record handling. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 16 23:13:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Sep 2006 19:13:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206819] New: Review Request: perl-String-Format - Sprintf-like string formatting capabilities with arbitrary format definitions Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206819 Summary: Review Request: perl-String-Format - Sprintf-like string formatting capabilities with arbitrary format definitions Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jpo at di.uminho.pt QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: ftp://perl.di.uminho.pt/pub/fedora/perl-String-Format.spec SRPM URL: ftp://perl.di.uminho.pt/pub/fedora/perl-String-Format-1.14-1.src.rpm Description: String::Format lets you define arbitrary printf-like format sequences to be expanded. This module would be most useful in configuration files and reporting tools, where the results of a query need to be formatted in a particular way. Note: This is a requirement of Perl::Critic. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 16 23:16:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Sep 2006 19:16:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203662] Review Request: dx - Open source version of IBM's Visualization Data Explorer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609162316.k8GNGe9k011977@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dx - Open source version of IBM's Visualization Data Explorer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203662 ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2006-09-16 19:16 EST ------- Removed: http://rpm.greysector.net/extras/dx.spec You're really picky. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 16 23:19:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Sep 2006 19:19:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203662] Review Request: dx - Open source version of IBM's Visualization Data Explorer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609162319.k8GNJAwI012021@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dx - Open source version of IBM's Visualization Data Explorer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203662 paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-09-16 19:18 EST ------- I know, but you love me really :-) APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 16 23:19:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Sep 2006 19:19:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206820] New: Review Request: perl-Term-ProgressBar - Provide a progress meter on a standard terminal Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206820 Summary: Review Request: perl-Term-ProgressBar - Provide a progress meter on a standard terminal Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Term-ProgressBar/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com SRPM URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-Term-ProgressBar-2.09-1.fc5.src.rpm SPEC URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-Term-ProgressBar.spec Description: Term::ProgressBar provides a simple progress bar on the terminal, to let the user know that something is happening, roughly how much stuff has been done, and maybe an estimate at how long remains. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 16 23:19:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Sep 2006 19:19:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206820] Review Request: perl-Term-ProgressBar - Provide a progress meter on a standard terminal In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609162319.k8GNJabH012064@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Term-ProgressBar - Provide a progress meter on a standard terminal https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206820 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |163776 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 16 23:20:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Sep 2006 19:20:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203662] Review Request: dx - Open source version of IBM's Visualization Data Explorer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609162320.k8GNKvbQ012118@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dx - Open source version of IBM's Visualization Data Explorer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203662 ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2006-09-16 19:20 EST ------- Likewise, thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 16 23:22:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Sep 2006 19:22:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187317] Review Request: mindi In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609162322.k8GNMgGm012182@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mindi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187317 bruno.cornec at hp.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(bruno.cornec at hp.co| |m) | ------- Additional Comments From bruno.cornec at hp.com 2006-09-16 19:22 EST ------- Thanks for looking at the package. the %post section is to avoid what happens frequently is a dual installation of tar.gz mindi and .rpm mindi with different versions. Depending on PATH it creates issues. That message is just here to prevent people doing that unintentionaly. In what way is it a problem ? (it doesn't break unattended installation as I've seen earlier). Concerning statically built binaries, it is provided upstream like that. It's a busybox version recompiled for mindi. Of course the .config file is provided so information on how to rebuild is there. mindi doesn't support other arch than x86, x86_64 and ia64, for which there is another busybox binary. That binary is just used during restore to create a mini-Unix environement. It would imply an upstream change to modify that, which is not planned yet. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 16 23:25:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Sep 2006 19:25:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191590] Review Request: fluidsynth-dssi - a FluidSynth DSSI plugin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609162325.k8GNPu5v012271@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fluidsynth-dssi - a FluidSynth DSSI plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191590 green at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From green at redhat.com 2006-09-16 19:25 EST ------- (In reply to comment #6) > Change the buildrequires and the package is > > APPROVED Done, thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 16 23:26:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Sep 2006 19:26:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206821] New: Review Request: perl-Devel-Size - Perl extension for finding the memory usage of Perl variables Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206821 Summary: Review Request: perl-Devel-Size - Perl extension for finding the memory usage of Perl variables Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Devel-Size/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com SRPM URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-Devel-Size-0.64-1.fc5.src.rpm SPEC URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-Devel-Size.spec Description: This module figures out the real sizes of Perl variables in bytes. Call functions with a reference to the variable you want the size of. If the variable is a plain scalar it returns the size of the scalar. If the variable is a hash or an array, use a reference when calling. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 16 23:26:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Sep 2006 19:26:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206821] Review Request: perl-Devel-Size - Perl extension for finding the memory usage of Perl variables In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609162326.k8GNQdFV012345@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Devel-Size - Perl extension for finding the memory usage of Perl variables https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206821 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |163776 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 16 23:57:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Sep 2006 19:57:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206824] New: Review Request: perl-POE-API-Peek - Peek into the internals of a running POE environment Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206824 Summary: Review Request: perl-POE-API-Peek - Peek into the internals of a running POE environment Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/POE-API-Peek/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com SRPM URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-POE-API-Peek-1.06-1.fc5.src.rpm SPEC URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-POE-API-Peek.spec Description: POE::API::Peek extends the POE::Kernel interface to provide clean access to Kernel internals in a cross-version compatible manner. Other calculated data is also available. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 16 23:57:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Sep 2006 19:57:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206824] Review Request: perl-POE-API-Peek - Peek into the internals of a running POE environment In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609162357.k8GNvZCe013149@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-POE-API-Peek - Peek into the internals of a running POE environment https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206824 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |206821 OtherBugsDependingO| |163776 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 16 23:57:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Sep 2006 19:57:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206821] Review Request: perl-Devel-Size - Perl extension for finding the memory usage of Perl variables In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609162357.k8GNvmVP013173@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Devel-Size - Perl extension for finding the memory usage of Perl variables https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206821 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |206824 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 17 00:27:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Sep 2006 20:27:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205300] Review Request: gtk-sharp - a set of mono bindings for gtk1.2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609170027.k8H0RZ3W013897@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtk-sharp - a set of mono bindings for gtk1.2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205300 rpm at greysector.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rpm at greysector.net ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2006-09-16 20:27 EST ------- Redundant BuildRequires: gtk2-devel libart_lgpl-devel gnome-vfs2-devel libgnomecanvas-devel libglade2-devel (required by libgnomeui-devel) libgnomeprintui22-devel (required by gtkhtml3-devel) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 17 00:33:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Sep 2006 20:33:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205300] Review Request: gtk-sharp - a set of mono bindings for gtk1.2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609170033.k8H0Xff0014013@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtk-sharp - a set of mono bindings for gtk1.2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205300 ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2006-09-16 20:33 EST ------- (In reply to comment #9) > 3. Still doesn't seem to build for me in mock/devel: > > Patch #0 (gtksharp-libdir.patch): > + patch -p1 -b --suffix .libdir -s > + autoreconf > configure.in:50: error: possibly undefined macro: PKG_PATH > If this token and others are legitimate, please use m4_pattern_allow. > See the Autoconf documentation. > autoreconf: /usr/bin/autoconf failed with exit status: 1 > error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.14789 (%prep) > > Are you sure you have the most recent spec up (-7?) That's because the patch and autoreconf call are invoked only on fc5: %if "%{?fedora}" > "5" %patch0 -p1 -b .libdir autoreconf %endif FYI: builds fine outside mock on FC5/x86_64 Another nitpick: use %setup -q .... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 17 00:35:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Sep 2006 20:35:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205300] Review Request: gtk-sharp - a set of mono bindings for gtk1.2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609170035.k8H0ZWie014074@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtk-sharp - a set of mono bindings for gtk1.2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205300 ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2006-09-16 20:35 EST ------- OK, I lied. It doesn't build fine: RPM build errors: File not found by glob: /home/dominik/build/tmp/gtk-sharp-1.0.10-7-root-dominik/usr/lib/*.so File not found: /home/dominik/build/tmp/gtk-sharp-1.0.10-7-root-dominik/usr/lib/pkgconfig/gapi.pc File not found by glob: /home/dominik/build/tmp/gtk-sharp-1.0.10-7-root-dominik/usr/lib/pkgconfig/*-sharp.pc I think these are due to: %if "%{?fedora}" == "5" %define monodir %{_prefix}/lib %else %define monodir %{_libdir} %endif -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 17 02:11:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Sep 2006 22:11:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203662] Review Request: dx - Open source version of IBM's Visualization Data Explorer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609170211.k8H2BVVr020232@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dx - Open source version of IBM's Visualization Data Explorer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203662 ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2006-09-16 22:11 EST ------- Imported (wow, that took a while) and built (with a small fix) for devel, FC-5 branch requested. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 17 04:37:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2006 00:37:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187317] Review Request: mindi In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609170437.k8H4bnlI030560@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mindi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187317 ------- Additional Comments From dennis at ausil.us 2006-09-17 00:37 EST ------- Our supported arches are x86, x86_64, and ppc. from http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines?action=show&redirect=PackageReviewGuidelines - MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch needs to have a bug filed in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug number should then be placed in a comment, next to the corresponding ExcludeArch line. New packages will not have bugzilla entries during the review process, so they should put this description in the comment until the package is approved, then file the bugzilla entry, and replace the long explanation with the bug number. (Extras Only) The bug should be marked as blocking one (or more) of the following bugs to simplify tracking such issues: [WWW] FE-ExcludeArch-x86, [WWW] FE-ExcludeArch-x64, [WWW] FE-ExcludeArch-ppc prebuilt binaries are not allowed. you must build them in your package or use the system busybox in this case. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-adf31c383612aac313719f7b4f8167b7dcf245d2 Upstream really should not provide them. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 17 05:09:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2006 01:09:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206819] Review Request: perl-String-Format - Sprintf-like string formatting capabilities with arbitrary format definitions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609170509.k8H59pvK031390@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-String-Format - Sprintf-like string formatting capabilities with arbitrary format definitions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206819 rc040203 at freenet.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |rc040203 at freenet.de OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2006-09-17 01:09 EST ------- Nothing much to say. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 17 05:17:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2006 01:17:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206818] Review Request: perl-MARC-Record - Object-oriented abstraction of MARC record handling In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609170517.k8H5H9L7031805@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-MARC-Record - Object-oriented abstraction of MARC record handling https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206818 rc040203 at freenet.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |rc040203 at freenet.de OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2006-09-17 01:17 EST ------- As usual, ... nothing to complain about ;) APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 17 05:21:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2006 01:21:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206836] New: Review Request: TurboJson - Python template plugin that supports json Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206836 Summary: Review Request: TurboJson - Python template plugin that supports json Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lmacken at redhat.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/lmacken/SPECS/TurboJson.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/lmacken/RPMS/TurboJson-0.9.9-1.src.rpm Description: This package provides a template engine plugin, allowing you to easily use Json with TurboGears, Buffet or other systems that support python.templating.engines. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 17 05:22:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2006 01:22:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206837] New: Review Request: TurboCheetah - TurboGears plugin to support use of Cheetah templates Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206837 Summary: Review Request: TurboCheetah - TurboGears plugin to support use of Cheetah templates Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lmacken at redhat.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/lmacken/SPECS/TurboCheetah.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/lmacken/RPMS/TurboCheetah-0.9.5-1.src.rpm Description: This package provides a template engine plugin, allowing you to easily use Cheetah with TurboGears, Buffet and other tools that support the python.templating.engines entry point. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 17 05:23:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2006 01:23:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206838] New: Review Request: TGFastData - Automatic user interface generation for TurboGears Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206838 Summary: Review Request: TGFastData - Automatic user interface generation for TurboGears Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lmacken at redhat.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/lmacken/SPECS/TGFastData.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/lmacken/RPMS/TGFastData-0.9a6-1.src.rpm Description: FastData is an extension to TurboGears which can provide automatic user interface generation based upon an application's model objects. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 17 05:24:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2006 01:24:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206839] New: Review Request: TurboKid - Python template plugin that supports Kid templates Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206839 Summary: Review Request: TurboKid - Python template plugin that supports Kid templates Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lmacken at redhat.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/lmacken/SPECS/TurboKid.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/lmacken/RPMS/TurboKid-0.9.8-2.src.rpm Description: This package provides a template engine plugin, allowing you to easily use Kid with TurboGears, Buffet or other systems that support python.templating.engines. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 17 05:35:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2006 01:35:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206837] Review Request: TurboCheetah - TurboGears plugin to support use of Cheetah templates In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609170535.k8H5ZXpk000304@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: TurboCheetah - TurboGears plugin to support use of Cheetah templates https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206837 lmacken at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |189338 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 17 05:35:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2006 01:35:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206839] Review Request: TurboKid - Python template plugin that supports Kid templates In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609170535.k8H5ZKfF032744@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: TurboKid - Python template plugin that supports Kid templates https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206839 lmacken at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |189338 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 17 05:35:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2006 01:35:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206836] Review Request: TurboJson - Python template plugin that supports json In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609170535.k8H5ZZMd000314@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: TurboJson - Python template plugin that supports json https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206836 lmacken at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |189338 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 17 05:35:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2006 01:35:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206838] Review Request: TGFastData - Automatic user interface generation for TurboGears In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609170535.k8H5Zbmf000323@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: TGFastData - Automatic user interface generation for TurboGears https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206838 lmacken at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |189338 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 17 06:22:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2006 02:22:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187913] Review Request: mysql-query-browser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609170622.k8H6MNYq002092@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mysql-query-browser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187913 ------- Additional Comments From Fedora at FamilleCollet.com 2006-09-17 02:22 EST ------- Too late i think.... MySQL does not continue providing update for this tools. The new bundle "MySQL GUI Tools" provide MySQL Administrator, Query Browser and Workbench (and FC5 RPM). Including the suite in the Extras still a great idea, at least for non i386 arch and for rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 17 07:17:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2006 03:17:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206842] New: Review Request: seq24 - Real-time MIDI sequencer Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206842 Summary: Review Request: seq24 - Real-time MIDI sequencer Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: green at redhat.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/green/FE/devel/seq24.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/green/FE/devel/seq24-0.8.7-1.src.rpm Description: Seq24 is a real-time midi sequencer. It was created to provide a very simple interface for editing and playing midi 'loops'. After searching for a software based sequencer that would provide the functionality needed for a live techno performance, such as the Akai MPC line, the Kawai Q80 sequencer, or the popular Alesis MMT-8, I found nothing similar in the software realm. I set out to create a very minimal sequencer that excludes the bloated features of the large software sequencers, and includes a small subset of features that I have found usable in performing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 17 07:39:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2006 03:39:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205030] Review Request: atomix - Little mind game where you have to build molecules out of atoms lying around In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609170739.k8H7dHod004791@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: atomix - Little mind game where you have to build molecules out of atoms lying around https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205030 fedora at leemhuis.info changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From fedora at leemhuis.info 2006-09-17 03:39 EST ------- Paul, thx for the review. (In reply to comment #8) > Guidance has pretty much not occured :-( I waited another week and tried two times to ping the games SIG in #fedora-games -- no reaction. So I went forward and imported atomix. We can fix this later if we reqally want to. Build for devel succeed, FC-5 branch requested. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 17 08:35:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2006 04:35:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205300] Review Request: gtk-sharp - a set of mono bindings for gtk1.2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609170835.k8H8Z0v2024677@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtk-sharp - a set of mono bindings for gtk1.2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205300 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-09-17 04:34 EST ------- #12 - if you're using rawhide, the version of mono shipped is architecture agnostic so on a 64 bit box, things go into /usr/lib64. Under FC5, everything is under /usr/lib I'll need to check on the errors you're seeing as I can't reproduce them here. #11 - it's done that way so I can see what's going on (needed for the time being, I'll switch to -q on the next release). The patch is invoked on anything above FC5 #10 - thanks #9 - always get the source from www.go-mono.com/source-latest (IIRC). I'll fix that. Thanks for the comments. I'll get -8 out sometime today -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 17 08:47:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2006 04:47:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193106] Review Request: gtkmozembedmm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609170847.k8H8lhNo025351@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtkmozembedmm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193106 ------- Additional Comments From karlthered at gmail.com 2006-09-17 04:47 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=136472) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=136472&action=view) mock root.log -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 17 08:48:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2006 04:48:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193106] Review Request: gtkmozembedmm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609170848.k8H8mK1e025381@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtkmozembedmm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193106 ------- Additional Comments From karlthered at gmail.com 2006-09-17 04:48 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=136473) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=136473&action=view) mock build.log -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 17 08:51:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2006 04:51:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193106] Review Request: gtkmozembedmm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609170851.k8H8pn4O025501@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtkmozembedmm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193106 ------- Additional Comments From karlthered at gmail.com 2006-09-17 04:51 EST ------- Weird, I tried twice to build the package under Mock for this configuration and it never failedwith the same src.rpm. $ mock -r fedora-6-i386-core.cfg gtkmozembedmm-1.4.2.cvs20060817-4.fc5.src.rpm init clean prep This may take a while setup build ending done Results and/or logs in: /var/lib/mock/fedora-development-i386-core/result -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 17 10:12:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2006 06:12:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206814] Review Request: hugin - Frontend for Panorama Tools, similar to PTAssembler, PTGui or Open for Windows In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609171012.k8HACUl2029417@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hugin - Frontend for Panorama Tools, similar to PTAssembler, PTGui or Open for Windows https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206814 paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-09-17 06:12 EST ------- BuildRequires: libpano12-devel > 2.8.3 zlib-devel libtiff-devel libjpeg-devel libpng-devel gettext-devel gcc-c++ BuildRequires: libstdc++-devel wxGTK-devel >= 2.6.0 boost-devel gtk+-devel glib2-devel You don't need gcc-c++ or libstdc++-devel really. Is there a reason for using the old gtk instead of gtk2? # autopanog.exe is a mono app In which case you need the BRs for mono - at least mono-devel and remember, if a mono app is being included, you're limited to FC5 and FC6. Currently, you also need a hack as FC6 mono is architecture agnostic (it get's things right!) and will probably need to fix things in the source. Let me know if you need a hand with it as mono can be a pain at times! %build %configure make Any reason for not using smp_mflags? If it fails, you need to include a comment as to why %{_datadir}/locale/*/LC_MESSAGES/hugin.mo %{_datadir}/locale/*/LC_MESSAGES/nona_gui.mo These are handled incorrectly. Some of the time with findlang, you need to use something other than %{name}. For example, in gnome-build, I use %find_lang gbf-1 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 17 10:58:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2006 06:58:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206814] Review Request: hugin - Frontend for Panorama Tools, similar to PTAssembler, PTGui or Open for Windows In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609171058.k8HAwS3Y031581@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hugin - Frontend for Panorama Tools, similar to PTAssembler, PTGui or Open for Windows https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206814 paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 17 11:32:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2006 07:32:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203662] Review Request: dx - Open source version of IBM's Visualization Data Explorer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609171132.k8HBWpxn001152@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dx - Open source version of IBM's Visualization Data Explorer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203662 rpm at greysector.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 17 11:32:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2006 07:32:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205057] Review Request: dx-samples - OpenDX Examples In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609171132.k8HBWqoQ001166@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dx-samples - OpenDX Examples https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205057 Bug 205057 depends on bug 203662, which changed state. Bug 203662 Summary: Review Request: dx - Open source version of IBM's Visualization Data Explorer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203662 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 17 11:54:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2006 07:54:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205300] Review Request: gtk-sharp - a set of mono bindings for gtk1.2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609171154.k8HBsi5W002879@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtk-sharp - a set of mono bindings for gtk1.2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205300 ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2006-09-17 07:54 EST ------- (In reply to comment #13) > #12 - if you're using rawhide, the version of mono shipped is architecture > agnostic so on a 64 bit box, things go into /usr/lib64. Under FC5, everything > is under /usr/lib I'm using FC5 and it's not, apparently. > I'll need to check on the errors you're seeing as I can't reproduce them here. Build log attached. > #11 - it's done that way so I can see what's going on (needed for the time > being, I'll switch to -q on the next release). The patch is invoked on > anything above FC5 Apparently that's what you meant, but that's not what happens. I.e. it gets called on fc5, too. Ah, I see the problem. Change all %if "%{?fedora}" to %if "%{fedora}" i.e. without the question mark. Still, some files get installed in %{_libdir} nonetheless: File not found by glob: /home/dominik/build/tmp/gtk-sharp-1.0.10-7-root-dominik/usr/lib/*.so File not found: /home/dominik/build/tmp/gtk-sharp-1.0.10-7-root-dominik/usr/lib/pkgconfig/gapi.pc Full build.log attached (built with my fix %{?fedora} -> %{fedora}). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 17 11:58:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2006 07:58:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205300] Review Request: gtk-sharp - a set of mono bindings for gtk1.2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609171158.k8HBwYQh003041@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtk-sharp - a set of mono bindings for gtk1.2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205300 ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2006-09-17 07:58 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=136479) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=136479&action=view) Build log on FC5/x86_64 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 17 12:09:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2006 08:09:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193106] Review Request: gtkmozembedmm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609171209.k8HC9lEx003490@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtkmozembedmm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193106 ------- Additional Comments From karlthered at gmail.com 2006-09-17 08:09 EST ------- I generated a new src.rpm with rpmbuild -bs : http://darkenphoenix.free.fr/RPMS/RPMS/Extras/SRPMS/gtkmozembedmm-1.4.2.cvs20060817-4.fc5.src.rpm Here are the packages generated by mock thanks to the previous src.rpm http://darkenphoenix.free.fr/RPMS/RPMS/Extras/SRPMS/gtkmozembedmm-1.4.2.cvs20060817-4.fc6.src.rpm http://darkenphoenix.free.fr/RPMS/RPMS/Extras/SRPMS/gtkmozembedmm-1.4.2.cvs20060817-4.fc6.i386.rpm http://darkenphoenix.free.fr/RPMS/RPMS/Extras/SRPMS/gtkmozembedmm-devel-1.4.2.cvs20060817-4.fc6.i386.rpm http://darkenphoenix.free.fr/RPMS/RPMS/Extras/SRPMS/gtkmozembedmm-debuginfo-1.4.2.cvs20060817-4.fc6.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 17 12:33:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2006 08:33:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206761] Review Request: kadu-theme - themes for Kadu In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609171233.k8HCXebl004513@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kadu-theme - themes for Kadu https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206761 mr.ecik at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From mr.ecik at gmail.com 2006-09-17 08:33 EST ------- Branch has been created and package built succesfully. Closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 17 13:28:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2006 09:28:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206821] Review Request: perl-Devel-Size - Perl extension for finding the memory usage of Perl variables In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609171328.k8HDSIHo007450@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Devel-Size - Perl extension for finding the memory usage of Perl variables https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206821 ville.skytta at iki.fi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |ville.skytta at iki.fi OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2006-09-17 09:28 EST ------- Nothing to add, approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 17 13:46:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2006 09:46:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206814] Review Request: hugin - Frontend for Panorama Tools, similar to PTAssembler, PTGui or Open for Windows In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609171346.k8HDksW9008123@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hugin - Frontend for Panorama Tools, similar to PTAssembler, PTGui or Open for Windows https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206814 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-09-17 09:46 EST ------- Definite NO-NO - you're building static libraries and not shared ones. rpmlint is throwing up a pile of errors, all of which are the same sort of thing E hugin version-control-internal-file /usr/share/doc/hugin-0.6.1/help_en_EN/CVS/Repository (or Entries) You need to sort out the translation problems as well the debuginfo looks likes it needs work on it as well (E: hugin-debuginfo script-without-shellbang /usr/src/debug/hugin-0.6.1/src/vigra_ext/MultiThreadOperations.cpp for example) Not yet made it in mock, will say what I get when I have. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 17 13:53:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2006 09:53:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206871] New: Review Request: ekg2 - Multi-protocol instant messaging and chat client Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206871 Summary: Review Request: ekg2 - Multi-protocol instant messaging and chat client Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rpm at greysector.net QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://rpm.greysector.net/extras/ekg2.spec SRPM URL: http://rpm.greysector.net/extras/ekg2-0-0.1.20060915.src.rpm Description: Multi-protocol instant messaging and chat client with many plugins. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 17 13:59:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2006 09:59:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205300] Review Request: gtk-sharp - a set of mono bindings for gtk1.2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609171359.k8HDx8GQ008418@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtk-sharp - a set of mono bindings for gtk1.2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205300 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-09-17 09:59 EST ------- If you're using FC-5's mono (1.1.13), then nothing has changed. Everything is under /usr/lib. This has caused me no end of problems ensuring that the likes of monodevelop et al work properly under both FC-5 and rawhide. The correct way of doing the %fedora bit is "%{?fedora}" - it's the same as using "%{?dist}" and gives the version in use as the return value. Just having "%{fedora}" is wrong. Have a look at the monodevelop, gtksourceview-sharp etc spec files for further examples. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 17 14:09:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2006 10:09:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205300] Review Request: gtk-sharp - a set of mono bindings for gtk1.2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609171409.k8HE9Vw0008704@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtk-sharp - a set of mono bindings for gtk1.2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205300 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-09-17 10:09 EST ------- Spec URL: http://www.knox.net.nz/~nodoid/gtk-sharp.spec SRPM URL: http://www.knox.net.nz/~nodoid/gtk-sharp-1.0.10-8.src.rpm The srpm has been verified as building in mock -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 17 14:10:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2006 10:10:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205300] Review Request: gtk-sharp - a set of mono bindings for gtk1.2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609171410.k8HEAdfS008754@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtk-sharp - a set of mono bindings for gtk1.2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205300 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-09-17 10:10 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=136482) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=136482&action=view) my mock config log -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 17 14:11:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2006 10:11:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205300] Review Request: gtk-sharp - a set of mono bindings for gtk1.2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609171411.k8HEBBo0008789@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtk-sharp - a set of mono bindings for gtk1.2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205300 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-09-17 10:11 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=136483) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=136483&action=view) root log -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 17 14:19:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2006 10:19:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206871] Review Request: ekg2 - Multi-protocol instant messaging and chat client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609171419.k8HEJZwq009103@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ekg2 - Multi-protocol instant messaging and chat client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206871 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-09-17 10:19 EST ------- Version: 0 Release: 0.1.%{_snap} This is a very early package. Is it really suitable at this stage for inclusion into FE? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 17 14:21:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2006 10:21:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206871] Review Request: ekg2 - Multi-protocol instant messaging and chat client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609171421.k8HELZgr009290@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ekg2 - Multi-protocol instant messaging and chat client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206871 ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2006-09-17 10:21 EST ------- Yes, it's already usable and used by many people, even though it is a CVS snapshot. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 17 14:23:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2006 10:23:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205300] Review Request: gtk-sharp - a set of mono bindings for gtk1.2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609171423.k8HENfCH009452@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtk-sharp - a set of mono bindings for gtk1.2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205300 ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2006-09-17 10:23 EST ------- RPM build errors: File not found by glob: /home/dominik/build/tmp/gtk-sharp-1.0.10-8-root-dominik/usr/lib/*.so File not found: /home/dominik/build/tmp/gtk-sharp-1.0.10-8-root-dominik/usr/lib/pkgconfig/gapi.pc File not found by glob: /home/dominik/build/tmp/gtk-sharp-1.0.10-8-root-dominik/usr/lib/pkgconfig/*-sharp.pc Obviously not in 64bit mock. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 17 14:38:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2006 10:38:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206871] Review Request: ekg2 - Multi-protocol instant messaging and chat client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609171438.k8HEcCKZ010262@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ekg2 - Multi-protocol instant messaging and chat client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206871 ------- Additional Comments From gajownik at gmail.com 2006-09-17 10:38 EST ------- It does not build here: b??d: Znaleziono zainstalowane (ale niespakietowane) pliki: /usr/lib/ekg2/plugins/rot13.so B??dy budowania RPM-a: Znaleziono zainstalowane (ale niespakietowane) pliki: /usr/lib/ekg2/plugins/rot13.so [rpm-build at X ekg2-0]$ which means that /usr/lib/ekg2/plugins/rot13.so file is not listed in %files section. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 17 14:52:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2006 10:52:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206398] Review Request: php-pecl-Fileinfo - libmagic bindings In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609171452.k8HEqb5f010668@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pecl-Fileinfo - libmagic bindings https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206398 Fedora at FamilleCollet.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |Fedora at FamilleCollet.com ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-09-15 21:23 EST ------- A couple of rpmlint complaints: W: php-pecl-Fileinfo summary-not-capitalized libmagic extension Indeed, the summary should be capitalized. But it would also be good to flesh the summary out a bit. E: php-pecl-Fileinfo zero-length /usr/share/doc/php-pecl-Fileinfo-1.0.3/EXPERIMENTAL In general you shouldn't package zero length files. Also, the %description could use a bit of grammatical cleanup. I suggest: ----- This extension allows the retrieval of file type information for the vast majority of files. This information may includes such information as dimensions or compression quality of images, duration of sound files, etc. Additionally, it can also be used to retrieve the MIME type for a particular file and, for text files, the proper language encoding. ----- You must use Requires: php-api = %{php_apiver}, not >=. If the PHP API version changes, you will need to recompile this module. Review: * source files match upstream: 799930038f76af23e391eef45789c607 Fileinfo-1.0.3.tgz * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * dist tag is present. * build root is correct. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. License text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * compiler flags are appropriate. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * package installs properly * debuginfo package looks complete. X rpmlint is silent. X final provides and requires are sane: config(php-pecl-Fileinfo) = 1.0.3-1.fc6 fileinfo.so()(64bit) php-Fileinfo = 1.0.3-1.fc6 php-pecl(Fileinfo) = 1.0.3-1.fc6 php-pecl-Fileinfo = 1.0.3-1.fc6 = config(php-pecl-Fileinfo) = 1.0.3-1.fc6 libmagic.so.1()(64bit) X php-api >= 20041225 * %check is not present; not test suite upstream. * no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. * package is not relocatable. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no libtool .la droppings. ------- Additional Comments From Fedora at FamilleCollet.com 2006-09-17 10:52 EST ------- One comment : %setup -q -n Fileinfo-%{version} Is not safe because package.xml will be store in BUILD directory (can be overide by another build running at the same time). %setup -c -q cd Fileinfo-%{version} Seem safer This should probably be add to the PHP Guidelines (for PEAR and PECL) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 17 14:56:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2006 10:56:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205300] Review Request: gtk-sharp - a set of mono bindings for gtk1.2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609171456.k8HEuFZN010784@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtk-sharp - a set of mono bindings for gtk1.2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205300 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-09-17 10:56 EST ------- This is very very annoying! I'm using exactly the same hack for monodevelop etc and the fedora buildsys allows it through for all platforms. I'm at a loss as to why your box should fail! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 17 14:57:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2006 10:57:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201502] Review Request: php-pear-PhpDocumentor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609171457.k8HEvL90010815@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-PhpDocumentor Alias: phpDocumentor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201502 Fedora at FamilleCollet.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |Fedora at FamilleCollet.com ------- Additional Comments From Fedora at FamilleCollet.com 2006-09-17 10:57 EST ------- One comment : %setup -q -n PhpDocumentor-%{version} Is not safe because package.xml will be store in BUILD directory (can be overide by another build running at the same time). %setup -c -q cd PhpDocumentor-%{version} Seem safer This should probably be add to the PHP Guidelines (for PEAR and PECL) See /etc/rpmdevtools/spectemplate-php-pear.spec from latest rpmdevtools-5.1-1.fc5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 17 15:17:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2006 11:17:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206872] New: Review Request: sipsak- SIP swiss army knife Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206872 Summary: Review Request: sipsak- SIP swiss army knife Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lemenkov at gmail.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://lemenkov.newmail.ru/SPECS/sipsak.spec SRPM URL: http://lemenkov.newmail.ru/SRPMS/sipsak-0.9.6-1.src.rpm Description: sipsak is a small command line tool for developers and administrators of Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) applications. It can be used for some simple tests on SIP applications and devices. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 17 15:41:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2006 11:41:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189889] Review Request: vkeybd - Virtual MIDI Keyboard In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609171541.k8HFf87V012284@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vkeybd - Virtual MIDI Keyboard https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189889 ------- Additional Comments From green at redhat.com 2006-09-17 11:41 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > Please ask upstream to add the license and add copyright headers to the > mentioned files. I've asked upstream. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 17 15:47:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2006 11:47:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206871] Review Request: ekg2 - Multi-protocol instant messaging and chat client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609171547.k8HFlWtN012530@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ekg2 - Multi-protocol instant messaging and chat client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206871 paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 17 15:48:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2006 11:48:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193106] Review Request: gtkmozembedmm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609171548.k8HFmKNx012601@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtkmozembedmm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193106 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-09-17 11:48 EST ------- Very odd. I have downloaded your src.rpm from comment #9 and unpacked it and fired off some mock builds on it. Will see if that works or if I can see the issue anywhere else. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 17 16:01:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2006 12:01:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206814] Review Request: hugin - Frontend for Panorama Tools, similar to PTAssembler, PTGui or Open for Windows In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609171601.k8HG1e1q013085@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hugin - Frontend for Panorama Tools, similar to PTAssembler, PTGui or Open for Windows https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206814 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-09-17 12:01 EST ------- Built cleanly in mock (x86) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 17 16:04:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2006 12:04:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196570] Review Request: mirage In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609171604.k8HG4Zpo013240@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mirage https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196570 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |201449 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 17 16:05:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2006 12:05:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200665] Review Request: ltris In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609171605.k8HG5rEX013335@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ltris https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200665 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |201449 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 17 16:09:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2006 12:09:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187913] Review Request: mysql-query-browser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609171609.k8HG990t013447@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mysql-query-browser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187913 dennis at ausil.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From dennis at ausil.us 2006-09-17 12:09 EST ------- All built and pushed. as for MySQL gui tools. yes i am aware of them and have started work on packaging them. they have written it to use lua 5.0 we have available lua 5.1 so i need to learn whats needed to port it over. The tarball for mysql-gui-tools contails beta and alpha software. But I do intend to get the whole gammut of mysql auite of tools in. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 17 16:09:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2006 12:09:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197765] Review Request: libical - A library for parsing iCal component In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609171609.k8HG9fNi013528@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libical - A library for parsing iCal component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197765 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163779 |163776 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 17 16:10:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2006 12:10:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197198] Review Request: ntop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609171610.k8HGA8ve013594@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ntop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197198 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |201449 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 17 16:11:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2006 12:11:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188400] Review Request: ssmtp In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609171611.k8HGB160013662@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ssmtp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188400 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163779 |163776 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 17 16:22:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2006 12:22:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206875] New: Review Request: libgadu - Gadu-Gadu protocol support library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206875 Summary: Review Request: libgadu - Gadu-Gadu protocol support library Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rpm at greysector.net QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://rpm.greysector.net/extras/libgadu.spec SRPM URL: http://rpm.greysector.net/extras/libgadu-1.7.0-1.src.rpm Description: libgadu is intended to make it easy to add Gadu-Gadu communication support to your software. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 17 16:32:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2006 12:32:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206877] New: Review Request: bzr-gtk - Bazaar plugin for GTK+ interfaces to most Bazaar operations Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206877 Summary: Review Request: bzr-gtk - Bazaar plugin for GTK+ interfaces to most Bazaar operations Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: wtogami at redhat.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: Bazaar plugin for GTK+ interfaces to most Bazaar operations SRPM URL: http://togami.com/~warren/fedora/bzr-gtk-0.10.0-1.src.rpm Description: bzr-gtk is a plugin for Bazaar that aims to provide GTK+ interfaces to most Bazaar operations. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 17 16:55:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2006 12:55:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206877] Review Request: bzr-gtk - Bazaar plugin for GTK+ interfaces to most Bazaar operations In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609171655.k8HGtUXY017142@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bzr-gtk - Bazaar plugin for GTK+ interfaces to most Bazaar operations https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206877 paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: bzr-gtk - |Review Request: bzr-gtk - |Bazaar plugin for GTK+ |Bazaar plugin for GTK+ |interfaces to most Bazaar |interfaces to most Bazaar |operations |operations ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-09-17 12:55 EST ------- rpmlint stuff... -src.rpm E: bzr-gtk description-line-too-long W: mixed use of spaces and tabs (ignore) noarch.rpm Lots of errors due to non-executable-script (start %{_libdir}/python2.4/site-packages/bzrlib/plugins/gtk/viz) __init__.py 0644, bzrkapp.py (start %{_libdir}/python2.4/site-packages/bzrlib/plugins/gtk/) __init__.py 0644, graphcell.py 0644, graph.py 0644, diffwin.py 0644, branchwin.py 0644 Spec file looks okay building now in mock -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 17 16:55:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2006 12:55:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206877] Review Request: bzr-gtk - Bazaar plugin for GTK+ interfaces to most Bazaar operations In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609171655.k8HGtxpn017183@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bzr-gtk - Bazaar plugin for GTK+ interfaces to most Bazaar operations https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206877 paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 17 16:57:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2006 12:57:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193106] Review Request: gtkmozembedmm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609171657.k8HGvit0017250@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtkmozembedmm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193106 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-09-17 12:57 EST ------- ok, Not sure if I had a corrupt autocache or a stale mirror or what... It now builds fine on fc6/i386. I am getting a diffrent build error on fc6/x86_64 however: Making all in src make[2]: Entering directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/gtkmozembedmm- 1.4.2.cvs20060817/gtkmozembed/src' /usr/lib/glibmm-2.4/proc/gmmproc -I ../../tools/m4 --defs . webcontrol . ./../ gtkmozembedmm make[2]: /usr/lib/glibmm-2.4/proc/gmmproc: Command not found make[2]: *** No rule to make target `/usr/lib/glibmm-2.4/proc/ generate_wrap_init.pl', needed by `../gtkmozembedmm/wrap_init.cc'. Stop. make[2]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... make[2]: *** [.stamps/stamp-webcontrol] Error 127 make[2]: Leaving directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/gtkmozembedmm- 1.4.2.cvs20060817/gtkmozembed/src' make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/gtkmozembedmm- 1.4.2.cvs20060817/gtkmozembed' make: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.44057 (%build) Looks like it's looking for proc/gmmproc in lib instead of lib64... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 17 17:20:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2006 13:20:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206875] Review Request: libgadu - Gadu-Gadu protocol support library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609171720.k8HHKAUv017846@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgadu - Gadu-Gadu protocol support library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206875 ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2006-09-17 13:20 EST ------- My ekg package is already tested and ready to build against this. I only need to cvs commit && make tag build. gg2 (currently under review in bug 205136) doesn't require any changes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 17 17:20:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2006 13:20:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206872] Review Request: sipsak- SIP swiss army knife In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609171720.k8HHKLC8017873@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sipsak- SIP swiss army knife https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206872 ------- Additional Comments From lemenkov at gmail.com 2006-09-17 13:20 EST ------- The main difficuty with this package is its options. It can be compiled with internal MD5 routines, with OpenSSL-based ones or even with GnuTLS. I have no idea which one is better. Guys from Mandriva used internal MD5 routines, but I prefer more modularity and reuse of components. Another one alternative is DNS-related part. Sipsak allows us to choose betwee c-ares (already in FE) and RULI-library (which isn't in FE still). So I prefer first variant here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 17 17:20:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2006 13:20:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206877] Review Request: bzr-gtk - Bazaar plugin for GTK+ interfaces to most Bazaar operations In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609171720.k8HHKNwA017880@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bzr-gtk - Bazaar plugin for GTK+ interfaces to most Bazaar operations https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206877 ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2006-09-17 13:20 EST ------- E: bzr-gtk non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/bzrlib/plugins/gtk/viz/__init__.py 0644 Does this really need to be executable? And how rpmlint seeing this as different from the many other py files that it isn't complaining about? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 17 17:25:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2006 13:25:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206877] Review Request: bzr-gtk - Bazaar plugin for GTK+ interfaces to most Bazaar operations In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609171725.k8HHPbvn018035@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bzr-gtk - Bazaar plugin for GTK+ interfaces to most Bazaar operations https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206877 ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2006-09-17 13:25 EST ------- http://togami.com/~warren/fedora/bzr-gtk-0.10.0-2.src.rpm http://togami.com/~warren/fedora/bzr-gtk.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 17 18:17:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2006 14:17:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206821] Review Request: perl-Devel-Size - Perl extension for finding the memory usage of Perl variables In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609171817.k8HIHjx7019466@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Devel-Size - Perl extension for finding the memory usage of Perl variables https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206821 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-09-17 14:17 EST ------- +Import to CVS +Add to owners.list +Bump release, build for devel +devel build succeeds +Request branching (FC-5) +Close bug Thanks for the review :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 17 18:17:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2006 14:17:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206824] Review Request: perl-POE-API-Peek - Peek into the internals of a running POE environment In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609171817.k8HIHvIi019484@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-POE-API-Peek - Peek into the internals of a running POE environment https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206824 Bug 206824 depends on bug 206821, which changed state. Bug 206821 Summary: Review Request: perl-Devel-Size - Perl extension for finding the memory usage of Perl variables https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206821 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 17 18:55:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2006 14:55:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205136] Review Request: gg2 - GNU Gadu 2 - free talking In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609171855.k8HItTig020663@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gg2 - GNU Gadu 2 - free talking https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205136 ------- Additional Comments From mr.ecik at gmail.com 2006-09-17 14:55 EST ------- I think perl dependency should be removed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 17 19:09:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2006 15:09:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206875] Review Request: libgadu - Gadu-Gadu protocol support library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609171909.k8HJ9xTB021031@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgadu - Gadu-Gadu protocol support library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206875 mr.ecik at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mr.ecik at gmail.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mr.ecik at gmail.com 2006-09-17 15:09 EST ------- I'll take it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 17 19:15:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2006 15:15:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205136] Review Request: gg2 - GNU Gadu 2 - free talking In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609171915.k8HJFBg4021260@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gg2 - GNU Gadu 2 - free talking https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205136 ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2006-09-17 15:14 EST ------- http://rpm.greysector.net/extras/gg2.spec And so it is. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 17 19:35:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2006 15:35:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206875] Review Request: libgadu - Gadu-Gadu protocol support library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609171935.k8HJZR2e022149@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgadu - Gadu-Gadu protocol support library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206875 mr.ecik at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mr.ecik at gmail.com 2006-09-17 15:35 EST ------- MUST items: * rpmlint: W: libgadu-devel no-documentation (should be ignored) * package meets Packaging (Naming) Guidelines * package is licensed by LGPL open-source compatible license * spec file is legible * md5sums are matching (152180afbbad584017592a3021aac97a) * package successfully compiles on x86_64 * BRs are good (mock builds fine) * no locales * proper %post and %postun * not relocatable * package doesn't create any directories * every %files includes %defattr * proper %clean section * header, .pc and .so files are in -devel * devel requires the base package using a fully versioned dependency * .la archives removed * no gui Everything looks good. Don't forget to remove libgadu from ekg.spec. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 17 19:40:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2006 15:40:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205136] Review Request: gg2 - GNU Gadu 2 - free talking In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609171940.k8HJenen022421@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gg2 - GNU Gadu 2 - free talking https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205136 mr.ecik at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mr.ecik at gmail.com 2006-09-17 15:40 EST ------- Okay, approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 17 20:03:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2006 16:03:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206877] Review Request: bzr-gtk - Bazaar plugin for GTK+ interfaces to most Bazaar operations In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609172003.k8HK3FYO022961@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bzr-gtk - Bazaar plugin for GTK+ interfaces to most Bazaar operations https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206877 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-09-17 16:03 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=136493) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=136493&action=view) New spec file This spec file addresses every warning and error rpmlint was throwing up on my buildsys. It builds cleanly in mock. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 17 20:11:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2006 16:11:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206875] Review Request: libgadu - Gadu-Gadu protocol support library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609172011.k8HKBvx5023156@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgadu - Gadu-Gadu protocol support library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206875 ------- Additional Comments From gajownik at gmail.com 2006-09-17 16:11 EST ------- > * BRs are good (mock builds fine) No, they are not. autoconf and automake are superflous. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 17 20:16:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2006 16:16:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206814] Review Request: hugin - Frontend for Panorama Tools, similar to PTAssembler, PTGui or Open for Windows In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609172016.k8HKGwum023383@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hugin - Frontend for Panorama Tools, similar to PTAssembler, PTGui or Open for Windows https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206814 ------- Additional Comments From bruno at postle.net 2006-09-17 16:16 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > > You don't need gcc-c++ or libstdc++-devel really. Is there a reason for using > the old gtk instead of gtk2? I've removed the c++ build dependencies and the gtk+ stuff was left over from when this library did build against gtk+, gone. > # autopanog.exe is a mono app > > In which case you need the BRs for mono Hugin is a front-end for lots of other tools. Autopano is one, but it is peripheral and not a hugin requirement. It is a mono app, so this fix would let it run if a user did decide to install it. > Any reason for not using smp_mflags? None, fixed. > Some of the time with findlang, you need to use something other than %{name}. I've reread the find_lang docs a few more times and I think I have it working, fixed. > E hugin version-control-internal-file Oops, very embarassing typo I added at the last minute, fixed. > E: hugin-debuginfo script-without-shellbang I don't get debuginfo RPMs on x86_64, should be fixed. > Definite NO-NO - you're building static libraries and not shared ones. The hugin sources contain a modified version of the vigra impex library, is that what you mean? Upstream intends to pass the changes further upstream, but until then they are linking it in statically. If it was separated it would conflict with the real vigra library. That's my understanding anyway. Spec URL: http://bugbear.blackfish.org.uk/~bruno/apt/SPECS/hugin.spec SRPM URL: http://bugbear.blackfish.org.uk/~bruno/apt/fedora/linux/5/x86_64/SRPMS.panorama/hugin-0.6.1-3.fc5.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 17 20:20:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2006 16:20:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206875] Review Request: libgadu - Gadu-Gadu protocol support library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609172020.k8HKK1LX023417@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgadu - Gadu-Gadu protocol support library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206875 ------- Additional Comments From gajownik at gmail.com 2006-09-17 16:19 EST ------- Oops, I forgot to mention, that it would be better to pass `--disable-dependency-tracking' to %configure macro. This speeds up a bit building and makes output more legible. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 17 20:22:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2006 16:22:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206875] Review Request: libgadu - Gadu-Gadu protocol support library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609172022.k8HKMXLH023486@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgadu - Gadu-Gadu protocol support library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206875 ------- Additional Comments From mr.ecik at gmail.com 2006-09-17 16:22 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > No, they are not. autoconf and automake are superflous. Okay, my fault... I only tested if mock builds fine, didn't check for their superflousment... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 17 20:24:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2006 16:24:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206875] Review Request: libgadu - Gadu-Gadu protocol support library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609172024.k8HKOt7T023573@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgadu - Gadu-Gadu protocol support library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206875 rpm at greysector.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2006-09-17 16:24 EST ------- Imported and built for devel. FC-5 branch requested. ekg updated and built for devel. FC-5 rebuild pending. I'll check the BRs later. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 17 20:35:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2006 16:35:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205136] Review Request: gg2 - GNU Gadu 2 - free talking In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609172035.k8HKZet1023912@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gg2 - GNU Gadu 2 - free talking https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205136 rpm at greysector.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2006-09-17 16:35 EST ------- Thanks! Imported and built for devel, FC-5 branch requested. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 17 20:59:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2006 16:59:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206814] Review Request: hugin - Frontend for Panorama Tools, similar to PTAssembler, PTGui or Open for Windows In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609172059.k8HKxMHV024496@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hugin - Frontend for Panorama Tools, similar to PTAssembler, PTGui or Open for Windows https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206814 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-09-17 16:59 EST ------- static linking should not be used http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-2302ec1e1f44202c9cc4bcce24cb711266557ad7 I'm not that happy in this case to use statically linked libs. I'll have a word higher up the food chain... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 17 21:11:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2006 17:11:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206814] Review Request: hugin - Frontend for Panorama Tools, similar to PTAssembler, PTGui or Open for Windows In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609172111.k8HLB8g0024777@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hugin - Frontend for Panorama Tools, similar to PTAssembler, PTGui or Open for Windows https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206814 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-09-17 17:11 EST ------- Okay, there are problems. 1. The mono stuff needs to be a subpackage, call it hugin-mono or something 2. You have a desktop icon in %{datadir}/applications but nothing in the spec 3. You have icons and the such as well as mime information in %datadir which is not handled. Have a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets?action=show&redirect=ScriptletSnippets for more information on these 4. ldconfigs not required - no libs being installed Also even on x86_64, you will have had a debuginfo package generated. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 17 22:21:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2006 18:21:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205057] Review Request: dx-samples - OpenDX Examples In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609172221.k8HML9fC026370@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dx-samples - OpenDX Examples https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205057 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-09-17 18:21 EST ------- builds cleanly rpmlint is happy builds fine in mock (x86) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 17 23:17:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2006 19:17:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205912] Review Request: Thunar - Thunar File Manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609172317.k8HNHc0u027805@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Thunar - Thunar File Manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205912 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-09-17 19:17 EST ------- Thanks a lot for the review. I fixed the file included twice in the just imported version. Imported into devel and built. 17872 (Thunar): Build on target fedora-development-extras succeeded. Build logs may be found at http://buildsys.fedoraproject.org/logs/fedora- development-extras/17872-Thunar-0.4.0-0.5.rc1.fc6/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 17 23:24:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2006 19:24:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199679] Review Request: pgpool - Connection pooling/replication server for PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609172324.k8HNOBwx027973@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pgpool - Connection pooling/replication server for PostgreSQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199679 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-09-17 19:24 EST ------- Ping Devrim. Are you still interested in submitting this? I haven't seen any reply since the review on the 9th. Just want to make sure you are still wanting to move forward with this at some point. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 17 23:27:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2006 19:27:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205041] Review Request: tellico - collection manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609172327.k8HNRsSO028144@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tellico - collection manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205041 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-09-17 19:27 EST ------- Any further progress on this submission? Did you see the suggestions in comment #3? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 18 00:03:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2006 20:03:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189188] Review Request: sqlgrey - postfix grey-listing policy service In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609180003.k8I03Ebu029315@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sqlgrey - postfix grey-listing policy service https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189188 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |kevin at tummy.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-09-17 20:03 EST ------- I'd be happy to take over this review... OK - Package name OK - Spec file matches base package name. OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines. OK - License (GPL) OK - License field in spec matches See below - License file included in package OK - Spec in American English OK - Spec is legible. OK - Sources match upstream md5sum: b84931d638c3527e2dabc26ad6754bc0 sqlgrey-1.7.4.tar.bz2 b84931d638c3527e2dabc26ad6754bc0 sqlgrey-1.7.4.tar.bz2.1 OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch. OK - BuildRequires correct OK - Package owns all the directories it creates. OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files. OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. OK - Package has a correct %clean section. OK - Spec has consistant macro usage. OK - Package is code or permissible content. OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime. OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. See below - No rpmlint output. SHOULD Items: See below - Should include License or ask upstream to include it. OK - Should build in mock. Builds ok on fc6 i386|x86_64 and fc5 i386|x86_64. OK - Should have sane scriptlets. Issues: 1. Might include the gpl COPYING file? 2. Might include the Changelog and CONTRIB as %doc files? 3. rpmlint says: W: sqlgrey conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/sqlgrey/README Does this need to be in /etc/sqlgrey? Or can it be in doc? E: sqlgrey non-standard-uid /var/lib/sqlgrey sqlgrey E: sqlgrey non-standard-gid /var/lib/sqlgrey sqlgrey E: sqlgrey non-standard-dir-perm /var/lib/sqlgrey 0750 All those can be ignored I think. 4. Have you been able to determine the issue from comment #6 about it not working? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 18 01:23:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2006 21:23:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193898] Review Request: Jython - Java source interpreter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609180123.k8I1NkMK032029@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Jython - Java source interpreter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193898 green at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |green at redhat.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 18 01:41:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2006 21:41:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206877] Review Request: bzr-gtk - Bazaar plugin for GTK+ interfaces to most Bazaar operations In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609180141.k8I1f999032675@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bzr-gtk - Bazaar plugin for GTK+ interfaces to most Bazaar operations https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206877 ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2006-09-17 21:40 EST ------- Making the permissions on those scripts 755 seems to be not needed at all. Most of similar installed files have 644 permissions, and this software works fine. These scripts are not meant to be run directly. Do we really need to do this? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 18 02:02:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2006 22:02:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192438] Review Request: fedora-xgl-settings In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609180202.k8I22vHX000836@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fedora-xgl-settings https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192438 ------- Additional Comments From s.adam at diffingo.com 2006-09-17 22:02 EST ------- rpmlint isn't silent on the SRPM: W: 3ddesktop no-url-tag E: 3ddesktop invalid-spec-name 3ddesktop-configurator.spec Your spec filename must end with '.spec'. If it's not the case, rename your file and rebuild your package. W: 3ddesktop rpm-buildroot-usage %prep rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT $RPM_BUILD_ROOT should not be touched during %build or %prep stage, as it will break short circuiting. E: 3ddesktop no-cleaning-of-buildroot You should clean $RPM_BUILD_ROOT in the %clean section and just after the beginning of %install section. Use "rm -Rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT". W: 3ddesktop mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs The specfile mixes use of spaces and tabs for indentation, which is a cosmetic annoyance. Use either spaces or tabs for indentation, not both. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 18 02:16:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2006 22:16:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187843] Review Request: phpMyAdmin - Web based MySQL browser written in php In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609180216.k8I2GIwD001243@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: phpMyAdmin - Web based MySQL browser written in php https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187843 ------- Additional Comments From s.adam at diffingo.com 2006-09-17 22:16 EST ------- rpmlint on SRPM: W: phpMyAdmin macro-in-%changelog _datadir Macros are expanded in %changelog too, which can in unfortunate cases lead to the package not building at all, or other subtle unexpected conditions that affect the build. Even when that doesn't happen, the expansion results in possibly "rewriting history" on subsequent package revisions and generally odd entries eg. in source rpms, which is rarely wanted. Avoid use of macros in %changelog altogether, or use two '%'s to escape them, like '%%foo'. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 18 02:21:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2006 22:21:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187843] Review Request: phpMyAdmin - Web based MySQL browser written in php In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609180221.k8I2LANN001389@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: phpMyAdmin - Web based MySQL browser written in php https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187843 ------- Additional Comments From s.adam at diffingo.com 2006-09-17 22:21 EST ------- Just to clairfy, I'm not a reviewer but I like the idea of phpMyAdmin in Extras and I'm trying to help out... I rebuilt your SRPM and this is rpmlint on the binary RPM: W: phpMyAdmin symlink-should-be-relative /usr/share/phpMyAdmin/config.inc.php /etc/phpMyAdmin/config.inc.php Absolute symlinks are problematic eg. when working with chroot environments. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 18 02:23:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2006 22:23:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199905] Review Request: gotmail In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609180223.k8I2NQ96001487@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gotmail https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199905 ------- Additional Comments From s.adam at diffingo.com 2006-09-17 22:23 EST ------- Hello, I'm not a official reviewer but I can help out a little... I tested a binary RPM generated from your source RPM with rpmlint, and it returned: W: gotmail incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.8.7-1 1:0.8.9-1 Your last entry in %changelog contains a version that is not coherent with the current version of your package. You just need to add a changelog into the SPEC to reflect the current version. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 18 02:46:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2006 22:46:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206877] Review Request: bzr-gtk - Bazaar plugin for GTK+ interfaces to most Bazaar operations In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609180246.k8I2kxw6002251@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bzr-gtk - Bazaar plugin for GTK+ interfaces to most Bazaar operations https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206877 frank at scirocco-5v-turbo.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |frank at scirocco-5v-turbo.de ------- Additional Comments From frank at scirocco-5v-turbo.de 2006-09-17 22:46 EST ------- Just remove the shebang (#!/usr/bin/python) from __init__.py to get rid of this rpmlint error. Maybe you can convince upstream to do the same, if it's really not needed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 18 03:06:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2006 23:06:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192438] Review Request: fedora-xgl-settings In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609180306.k8I361ch002693@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fedora-xgl-settings https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192438 ------- Additional Comments From s.adam at diffingo.com 2006-09-17 23:06 EST ------- Hello, Sorry, I forgot to mention before that I'm not a Fedora reviewer, but I'm just helping out. I've tried building your RPM and it fails, but once I install these packages: (1) jakarta-oro (2) libgtk-java (3) libglade-java (4) libgconf-java It will build, but with warnings. I think those need to be on %buildrequries, and if they're needed for running it too, then in regular %requires. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 18 04:04:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2006 00:04:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199905] Review Request: gotmail In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609180404.k8I44jEj004354@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gotmail https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199905 ------- Additional Comments From james at lovedthanlost.net 2006-09-18 00:04 EST ------- That should be fixed - there are two spec files: gotmail.spec.in - which is for our Gotmail CVS builds - IGNORE IT. gotmail.spec - which is for Fedora Extras -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 18 05:59:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2006 01:59:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199679] Review Request: pgpool - Connection pooling/replication server for PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609180559.k8I5xBJh007498@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pgpool - Connection pooling/replication server for PostgreSQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199679 ------- Additional Comments From guillaume.smet at gmail.com 2006-09-18 01:58 EST ------- Kevin, Devrim is on vacation at the moment (10 days left IIRC). No doubt he'll work on this again when he'll be back. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 18 06:27:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2006 02:27:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206398] Review Request: php-pecl-Fileinfo - libmagic bindings In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609180627.k8I6RPT2008273@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pecl-Fileinfo - libmagic bindings https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206398 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at theholbrooks.org 2006-09-18 02:27 EST ------- Spec URL: http://theholbrooks.org/RPMS/php-pecl-Fileinfo.spec SRPM URL: http://theholbrooks.org/RPMS/php-pecl-Fileinfo-1.0.3-2.src.rpm Jason, I've made the changes you requested. Remi, I based this spec file off of you pecl-zip spec :), which I see has now been updated to reflect the changes you suggest. I agree extracting package.xml into the build directory is a very bad idea, and a good catch on your part BTW. I've made the same changes to this package, but I'm not thrilled about having to add 'Fileinfo-%{version}/' in front of my %doc files so RPM could find them. For pecl packages with more files, that gets even worse. For the moment, however, I can't think of any other way to do it. +1 for adding it to the guidelines (at least as a suggestion for now, if not a requirement). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 18 08:33:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2006 04:33:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192418] Review Request: xbae - Xbae widget set In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609180833.k8I8XxfM015561@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xbae - Xbae widget set https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192418 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-09-18 04:33 EST ------- Done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 18 10:05:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2006 06:05:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 173459] Review Request: initng In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609181005.k8IA5ABo022235@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 ------- Additional Comments From che666 at gmail.com 2006-09-18 06:05 EST ------- new release just happened 30 seconds ago: http://download.initng.org/initng/v0.6/initng-0.6.8.tar.bz2 http://download.initng.org/initng-ifiles/v0.0/initng-ifiles-0.0.6.tar.bz2 testing has been done... its working fine for me so far. known problems: squid doesent terminate properly -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 18 11:11:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2006 07:11:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201077] gfs-kmod In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609181111.k8IBBcKf026447@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: gfs-kmod https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201077 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-09-18 07:11 EST ------- I created SRPM for this package on new fc6 kenrel 2.6.17-1.2647.fc6 and i got rpmlint warnings as W: kmod-gfs summary-not-capitalized gfs kernel module(s) Summary doesn't begin with a capital letter. W: kmod-gfs no-version-in-last-changelog The last changelog entry doesn't contain a version. Please insert the version that is coherent with the version of the package and rebuild it. W: kmod-gfs unstripped-binary-or-object /lib/modules/2.6.17-1.2647.fc6/extra/gfs/gfs.ko W: kmod-gfs no-documentation The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include documentation files. Update package and post new links here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 18 13:41:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2006 09:41:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192420] Review Request: Bonfire - CD/DVD burning app for gnome In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609181341.k8IDf4YL003690@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Bonfire - CD/DVD burning app for gnome https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192420 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |201449 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-09-18 09:41 EST ------- Agreed, closing. Please (re)submit renamed submission. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 18 14:56:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2006 10:56:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193059] Review Request: ibmasm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609181456.k8IEuRxC009059@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ibmasm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193059 ------- Additional Comments From konradr at redhat.com 2006-09-18 10:56 EST ------- Paul, A week passed so fast for me. I will get this done by Wednesday. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 18 15:11:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2006 11:11:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199679] Review Request: pgpool - Connection pooling/replication server for PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609181511.k8IFBRh9010723@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pgpool - Connection pooling/replication server for PostgreSQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199679 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-09-18 11:11 EST ------- Excellent. Thanks for the info. I will look forward to hearing from him when he gets back. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 18 16:08:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2006 12:08:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206877] Review Request: bzr-gtk - Bazaar plugin for GTK+ interfaces to most Bazaar operations In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609181608.k8IG80XK017493@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bzr-gtk - Bazaar plugin for GTK+ interfaces to most Bazaar operations https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206877 ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2006-09-18 12:07 EST ------- Requesting approval of the package in #3 which fixes the .src.rpm rpmlint warnings. The opinion of fedora-extras-list is the permission issues are not a problem at all. Removal of shebang is not required either. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 18 16:36:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2006 12:36:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206985] New: Review Request: perl-Device-SerialPort Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206985 Summary: Review Request: perl-Device-SerialPort Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All URL: http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: orion at cora.nwra.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec Name or Url: http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/perl-Device-SerialPort.spec SRPM Name or Url: http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/perl-Device-SerialPort-1.002-1.fc5.src.rpm Description: This module provides an object-based user interface essentially identical to the one provided by the Win32::SerialPort module. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 18 17:02:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2006 13:02:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206989] New: Review Request: twinkle - A SIP Soft Phone Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206989 Summary: Review Request: twinkle - A SIP Soft Phone Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kevin at tummy.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.scrye.com/~kevin/extras/twinkle/twinkle.spec SRPM URL: http://www.scrye.com/~kevin/extras/twinkle/twinkle-0.8.1-1.fc6.src.rpm Description: Twinkle is a SIP based soft phone for making telephone calls over IP networks. Builds ok in mock for fc5/fc6 i386/x86_64. rpmlint is silent. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 18 17:07:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2006 13:07:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 173459] Review Request: initng In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609181707.k8IH7mEc024743@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 sundaram at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |sundaram at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From sundaram at redhat.com 2006-09-18 13:07 EST ------- The last comment from the submitter has been made 4 months back. I guess we will give it a week and close this review request. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 18 17:11:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2006 13:11:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 173459] Review Request: initng In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609181711.k8IHB9if025160@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2006-09-18 13:10 EST ------- Folks might want to look at upstart as an alternative to initng. http://www.netsplit.com/blog/work/canonical/upstart.html Supposedly it is fully compatible with existing service scripts while working very well... at least according to Ubuntu. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 18 17:22:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2006 13:22:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206875] Review Request: libgadu - Gadu-Gadu protocol support library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609181722.k8IHMXDo026351@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgadu - Gadu-Gadu protocol support library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206875 ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2006-09-18 13:22 EST ------- According to http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/FullExceptionList automake and autoconf are NOT in the minimal buildroot, so they are NOT redundant. Dawid, feel free to prove me wrong. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 18 18:21:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2006 14:21:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206875] Review Request: libgadu - Gadu-Gadu protocol support library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609181821.k8IILc8l032600@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgadu - Gadu-Gadu protocol support library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206875 ------- Additional Comments From gajownik at gmail.com 2006-09-18 14:21 EST ------- Well, you don't regenerate configure script nor Makefile.in files. I don't see a reason to BR automake or autoconf ;-) Package builds fine without them. BTW I noticed some differences in libgadu.pc file when someone recompiles libgadu with or without pkgconfig. What is more, there is to much bloat (I mean including whole CFLAGS variable from build system). libgadu.pc from ekg's libgadu-devel subpackage looks more sane to me :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 18 19:29:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2006 15:29:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206818] Review Request: perl-MARC-Record - Object-oriented abstraction of MARC record handling In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609181929.k8IJTMdY006474@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-MARC-Record - Object-oriented abstraction of MARC record handling https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206818 jpo at di.uminho.pt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From jpo at di.uminho.pt 2006-09-18 15:29 EST ------- Thanks for the review. Imported and built for FC-5 and devel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 18 19:29:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2006 15:29:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206819] Review Request: perl-String-Format - Sprintf-like string formatting capabilities with arbitrary format definitions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609181929.k8IJTpTr006526@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-String-Format - Sprintf-like string formatting capabilities with arbitrary format definitions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206819 jpo at di.uminho.pt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From jpo at di.uminho.pt 2006-09-18 15:29 EST ------- Thanks for the review. Imported and built for FC-5 and devel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 18 20:14:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2006 16:14:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206877] Review Request: bzr-gtk - Bazaar plugin for GTK+ interfaces to most Bazaar operations In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609182014.k8IKEN6l009861@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bzr-gtk - Bazaar plugin for GTK+ interfaces to most Bazaar operations https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206877 paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-09-18 16:14 EST ------- Okay. Review: Spec file in US-English Consistent use of macros Contains docs upstream and package md5sums match the software installs and deinstalls cleanly no dupes in the rpms contains a %clean section builds cleanly in mock rpmlint gives plenty of warnings and errors, but they can be ignored follows python packaging guidelines APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 18 20:14:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2006 16:14:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206814] Review Request: hugin - Frontend for Panorama Tools, similar to PTAssembler, PTGui or Open for Windows In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609182014.k8IKEsCV009924@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hugin - Frontend for Panorama Tools, similar to PTAssembler, PTGui or Open for Windows https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206814 ------- Additional Comments From bruno at postle.net 2006-09-18 16:14 EST ------- (In reply to comment #6) > > 1. The mono stuff needs to be a subpackage, call it hugin-mono or something There isn't any mono code in hugin. autopanog is in another package which I won't be submitting as the basic algorithm is US patented and hugin runs fine without it. The fix in the spec is a convenience thing for users who do want to install it. > 2. You have a desktop icon in %{datadir}/applications but nothing in the spec > 3. You have icons and the such as well as mime information in %datadir which is > not handled. Thanks, hadn't found this stuff before. Should be fixed. > 4. ldconfigs not required - no libs being installed Fixed. > Also even on x86_64, you will have had a debuginfo package generated. Nope. I guess there is something wrong with my system as x86_64 RPMs never get stripped and I get no debuginfo packages. I'll ask upstream what the situation is with all the .la libraries that get statically linked. I think this is just a case of programming style, they are not intended to be exported. SPEC URL: http://bugbear.blackfish.org.uk/~bruno/apt/SPECS/hugin.spec SRPM URL: http://bugbear.blackfish.org.uk/~bruno/apt/fedora/linux/5/x86_64/SRPMS.panorama/hugin-0.6.1-4.fc5.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 18 20:17:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2006 16:17:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205300] Review Request: gtk-sharp - a set of mono bindings for gtk1.2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609182017.k8IKHiw3010104@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtk-sharp - a set of mono bindings for gtk1.2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205300 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-09-18 16:17 EST ------- Spec URL: http://www.knox.net.nz/~nodoid/gtk-sharp.spec SRPM URL: http://www.knox.net.nz/~nodoid/gtk-sharp-1.0.10-9.src.rpm Fixes the problems you've had! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 18 20:30:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2006 16:30:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 173459] Review Request: initng In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609182030.k8IKU7J9011295@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 ------- Additional Comments From che666 at gmail.com 2006-09-18 16:30 EST ------- #317 been there tried that :) lets talk again once someone invested the time to create a proper jobs package and when it has selinux support. i got basic upstart spec files around if there are any takers. initng actually just wfm. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 18 20:43:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2006 16:43:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206814] Review Request: hugin - Frontend for Panorama Tools, similar to PTAssembler, PTGui or Open for Windows In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609182043.k8IKhcjY012719@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hugin - Frontend for Panorama Tools, similar to PTAssembler, PTGui or Open for Windows https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206814 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-09-18 16:43 EST ------- (In reply to comment #7) > (In reply to comment #6) > > Also even on x86_64, you will have had a debuginfo package generated. > > Nope. I guess there is something wrong with my system as x86_64 RPMs never get > stripped and I get no debuginfo packages. Do you have the redhat-rpm-config package installed? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 18 20:57:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2006 16:57:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206814] Review Request: hugin - Frontend for Panorama Tools, similar to PTAssembler, PTGui or Open for Windows In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609182057.k8IKv2Cj014481@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hugin - Frontend for Panorama Tools, similar to PTAssembler, PTGui or Open for Windows https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206814 ------- Additional Comments From bruno at postle.net 2006-09-18 16:56 EST ------- (In reply to comment #8) > > Do you have the redhat-rpm-config package installed? I do now ;-) I had it on my old i386 box, but not here. I missed it because it isn't mentioned in the Packaging/Guidelines. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 18 21:05:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2006 17:05:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205300] Review Request: gtk-sharp - a set of mono bindings for gtk1.2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609182105.k8IL5raV016265@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtk-sharp - a set of mono bindings for gtk1.2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205300 ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2006-09-18 17:05 EST ------- Builds fine here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 18 21:09:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2006 17:09:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192434] Review Request: compiz-quinn In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609182109.k8IL9YUG016748@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compiz-quinn https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192434 ------- Additional Comments From s.adam at diffingo.com 2006-09-18 17:09 EST ------- Hello, I'm not a reviewer but I can give a little help - In the Guidelines, rpmlint errors must be fixed. This is the output of rpmlint on the SRPM you provided above: (extra output enabled) E: compiz-quinn description-line-too-long effects in window management, such as a minimization effect and a cube workspace. Your description lines must not exceed 79 characters. If a line is exceeding this number, cut it to fit in two lines. E: compiz-quinn description-line-too-long Compiz use EXT_texture_from_pixmap OpenGL extension extension for binding redirected Your description lines must not exceed 79 characters. If a line is exceeding this number, cut it to fit in two lines. W: compiz-quinn invalid-license X11/MIT/GPL The value of the License tag is invalid. Valid values are: "Academic Free License", "Adaptive Public License", "Apache License", "Apache Software License", "Apple Public Source License", "Artistic", "Attribution Assurance License", "BSD", "Computer Associates Trusted Open Source License", "CDDL", "CPL", "CUA Office Public License", "EU DataGrid Software License", "Eclipse Public License", "Educational Community License", "Eiffel Forum License", "Entessa Public License", "Fair License", "Frameworx License", "GPL", "LGPL", "Historical Permission Notice and Disclaimer", "IBM Public License", "Intel Open Source License", "Jabber Open Source License", "Lucent Public License", "MIT", "CVW License", "Motosoto License", "MPL", "NASA Open Source Agreement", "Naumen Public License", "Nethack General Public License", "Nokia Open Source License", "OCLC Research Public License", "Open Group Test Suite License", "Open Software License", "PHP License", "Python license", "Python Software Foundation License", "QPL", "RealNetworks Public Source License", "Reciprocal Public License", "Ricoh Source Code Public License", "Sleepycat License", "Sun Industry Standards Source License", "Sun Public License", "Sybase Open Watcom Public License", "University of Illinois/NCSA Open Source License", "Vovida Software License", "W3C License", "wxWindows Library License", "X.Net License", "Zope Public License", "zlib License", "Design Public License", "GFDL", "LaTeX Project Public License", "OpenContent License", "Open Publication License", "Public Domain", "Ruby License", "SIL Open Font License", "Charityware", "Commercial", "Distributable", "Freeware", "Non-distributable", "Proprietary", "Shareware". If the license is close to an existing one, you can use ' style'. error checking signature of compiz-quinn-0.0.13-1.fc5.src.rpm W: compiz-quinn strange-permission gnome-compizrc 0755 A file that you listed to include in your package has strange permissions. Usually, a file should have 0644 permissions. E: compiz-quinn invalid-spec-name repo-compiz-quinn.spec Your spec filename must end with '.spec'. If it's not the case, rename your file and rebuild your package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 18 21:15:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2006 17:15:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189188] Review Request: sqlgrey - postfix grey-listing policy service In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609182115.k8ILFkaG017246@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sqlgrey - postfix grey-listing policy service https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189188 ------- Additional Comments From steve at silug.org 2006-09-18 17:15 EST ------- (In reply to comment #8) > 1. Might include the gpl COPYING file? > > 2. Might include the Changelog and CONTRIB as %doc files? I'll fix that in -3. > 3. rpmlint says: > > W: sqlgrey conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/sqlgrey/README > > Does this need to be in /etc/sqlgrey? Or can it be in doc? Here are the contents of that file: README file for sqlgrey updated content Don't touch these files, they are automatically updated when you run update_sqlgrey_config: - clients_fqdn_whitelist: don't greylist these DNS names [*] - clients_ip_whitelist : don't greylist these IP addresses [*] - dyn_fqdn.regexp : used by new 'smart' algorithm [x] - smtp_server.regexp : used by new 'smart' algortihm [x] [*]: in use starting with 1.4.0 [x]: in use since 1.5.1, regexps looking for known fqdns patterns So I think it seems appropriate to leave it in that directory. > E: sqlgrey non-standard-uid /var/lib/sqlgrey sqlgrey > E: sqlgrey non-standard-gid /var/lib/sqlgrey sqlgrey > E: sqlgrey non-standard-dir-perm /var/lib/sqlgrey 0750 > > All those can be ignored I think. Agreed. > 4. Have you been able to determine the issue from comment #6 about it not > working? Not yet, but until today I haven't taken a moment to look at it. Once I'm done with my last couple of pre-FC6 package upgrades, I should have some time for this again. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 18 21:28:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2006 17:28:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191743] Review Request: sysprof - a sampling CPU profiler In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609182128.k8ILSxnI018388@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sysprof - a sampling CPU profiler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191743 ------- Additional Comments From s.adam at diffingo.com 2006-09-18 17:28 EST ------- I'm not a reviewer, but I can help: This is shown by rpmlin on the SRPMS... E: sysprof configure-without-libdir-spec A configure script is run without specifying the libdir. configure options must be augmented with something like --libdir=%{_libdir}. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 18 21:48:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2006 17:48:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192438] Review Request: fedora-xgl-settings In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609182148.k8ILmpuX020823@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fedora-xgl-settings https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192438 ------- Additional Comments From s.adam at diffingo.com 2006-09-18 17:48 EST ------- I've done further testing, and noticed that in your pam files you're using the old stack - Instead, have the PAM files read: auth include config-util account include config-util session include config-util Also, building a binary RPM complains about not finding a bunch of javadocs APIs, and also then fails because it cannot replace a 'overview-frame.html' : [javadoc] WARNING: Cannot locate class java.nio.CharBuffer referenced in class org.fedora3ddesktop.cmdline.Utils [ messages continue ] [javadoc] WARNING: Cannot locate class org.gnu.gtk.event.ButtonEvent referenced in class org.fedora3ddesktop.gui.DialogGdmDisplayManager [ messages continue ] [...]/BUILD/3ddesktop-0.1/build.xml:86: Replace: source file [...]/BUILD/3ddesktop-0.1/docs/api/overview-frame.html doesn't existfile. Maybe there are more %requires needed? Also, fixing the no-cleaning-of-buildroot error is simple, all you have to to is add: rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT to the very beginning of %install. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 18 22:31:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2006 18:31:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188974] Review Request: libGLw In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609182231.k8IMVLi5023257@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libGLw https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188974 ------- Additional Comments From ajackson at redhat.com 2006-09-18 18:31 EST ------- Renamed back to mesa-libGLw at: http://people.freedesktop.org/~ajax/fedora/mesa-libGLw/mesa-libGLw-1.0-4.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 18 22:35:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2006 18:35:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192438] Review Request: fedora-xgl-settings In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609182235.k8IMZYL2023635@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fedora-xgl-settings https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192438 ------- Additional Comments From s.adam at diffingo.com 2006-09-18 18:35 EST ------- It finally compiled on my FC6T3 system one I removed lines 85 and 86 in the build.xml... The additional packages I needed to install are listed above. rpmlint output on the binary RPMS: W: 3ddesktop incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.1-1 0:0.1-1 Your last entry in %changelog contains a version that is not coherent with the current version of your package. W: 3ddesktop no-url-tag E: 3ddesktop zero-length /usr/share/doc/3ddesktop-0.1/README E: 3ddesktop zero-length /usr/share/doc/3ddesktop-0.1/ChangeLog W: 3ddesktop class-path-in-manifest /usr/share/java/3ddesktop-gui-0.1.jar The META-INF/MANIFEST file in the jar contains a hardcoded Class-Path. These entries do not work with older Java versions and even if they do work, they are inflexible and usually cause nasty surprises. W: 3ddesktop class-path-in-manifest /usr/share/java/3ddesktop-info-0.1.jar The META-INF/MANIFEST file in the jar contains a hardcoded Class-Path. These entries do not work with older Java versions and even if they do work, they are inflexible and usually cause nasty surprises. W: 3ddesktop class-path-in-manifest /usr/share/java/3ddesktop-switch-0.1.jar The META-INF/MANIFEST file in the jar contains a hardcoded Class-Path. These entries do not work with older Java versions and even if they do work, they are inflexible and usually cause nasty surprises. W: 3ddesktop-javadoc non-standard-group Development/Java The value of the Group tag in the package is not valid. Valid groups are: "Amusements/Games", "Amusements/Graphics", "Applications/Archiving", "Applications/Communications", "Applications/Databases", "Applications/Editors", "Applications/Emulators", "Applications/Engineering", "Applications/File", "Applications/Internet", "Applications/Multimedia", "Applications/Productivity", "Applications/Publishing", "Applications/System", "Applications/Text", "Development/Debug", "Development/Debuggers", "Development/Languages", "Development/Libraries", "Development/System", "Development/Tools", "Documentation", "System Environment/Base", "System Environment/Daemons", "System Environment/Kernel", "System Environment/Libraries", "System Environment/Shells", "User Interface/Desktops", "User Interface/X", "User Interface/X Hardware Support". W: 3ddesktop-javadoc no-url-tag If you need help cleaning those errors out, let me know - I'll help modify the spec file -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 18 23:01:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2006 19:01:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207047] New: Review Request: ed2k_hash - Ed2k file hash calculator Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207047 Summary: Review Request: ed2k_hash - Ed2k file hash calculator Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rpm at greysector.net QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://rpm.greysector.net/extras/ed2k_hash.spec SRPM URL: http://rpm.greysector.net/extras/ed2k_hash-0.4.0-1.src.rpm Description: A tool that outputs ed2k-links for given files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 18 23:39:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2006 19:39:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 171993] Review Request: mpich2 - An implementation of MPI In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609182339.k8INdAAj027625@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mpich2 - An implementation of MPI https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=171993 ------- Additional Comments From cmc at math.hmc.edu 2006-09-18 19:39 EST ------- Note that the MPICH2 site now says: The current version of MPICH2 is 1.0.4p1, released on August 11, 2006. 1.0.4p1 is a patch release that fixes some problems in the 1.0.4 release, such as the Nemesis configure problem and a few other minor bugs. If you already have a working 1.0.4, you need not switch to 1.0.4p1. The Windows version is still at 1.0.3. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 18 23:45:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2006 19:45:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207051] New: Search tab does not refresh after install Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207051 Summary: Search tab does not refresh after install Product: Fedora Core Version: fc6test3 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: high Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: jkeating at redhat.com ReportedBy: baerjj at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Description of problem: After a package has been installed using package manager under the search tab the contents of the form does not refresh. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): FC6 T3 How reproducible: Very Steps to Reproduce: 1. Load package manager 2. Select search tab 3. Make selection and install Actual results: All form elements are missing. Expected results: Blank form. Additional info: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 19 01:49:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2006 21:49:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207051] Search tab does not refresh after install In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609190149.k8J1n5xg000537@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Search tab does not refresh after install https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207051 notting at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|Package Review |pirut AssignedTo|jkeating at redhat.com |katzj at redhat.com QAContact|extras-qa at fedoraproject.org | CC|fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 19 04:38:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2006 00:38:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205300] Review Request: gtk-sharp - a set of mono bindings for gtk1.2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609190438.k8J4cBug010655@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtk-sharp - a set of mono bindings for gtk1.2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205300 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-09-19 00:38 EST ------- 1. Your Source0 still isn't quite right. I was able to get the source via: http://go-mono.com/sources/gtk-sharp/gtk-sharp-1.0.10.tar.gz That md5sum matches: e21fb3c5a39374f86ba70b926311a6d0 gtk-sharp-1.0.10.tar.gz e21fb3c5a39374f86ba70b926311a6d0 gtk-sharp-1.0.10.tar.gz.1 2. looks good. 3. At first I was getting the: mono: mono-codeman.c:257: new_codechunk: Assertion `!err' failed. make[2]: *** [gapi_codegen.exe] Aborted make[2]: Leaving directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/gtk-sharp-1.0.10/generator' make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/gtk-sharp-1.0.10' make: *** [all] Error 2 error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.14252 (%build) But then I realized the cause. I hadn't disabled selinux on my new build machine. Mono apparently tries to do something odd to the stack when compiling, and selinux blocks it. Sep 18 22:09:31 thulsadoom kernel: audit(1158638970.725:4300): avc: denied { execmem } for pid=25215 comm="mono" scontext=user_u:system_r:unconfined_t:s0 tcontext=user_u:system_r:unconfined_t:s0 tclass=process Disabling selinux gets it compiling on both i386 and x86_64... rpmlint says: E: gtk-sharp invalid-soname /usr/lib/libgladesharpglue.so libgladesharpglue.so E: gtk-sharp invalid-soname /usr/lib/libglibsharpglue.so libglibsharpglue.so E: gtk-sharp invalid-soname /usr/lib/libgtksharpglue.so libgtksharpglue.so E: gtk-sharp invalid-soname /usr/lib/libgnomesharpglue.so libgnomesharpglue.so E: gtk-sharp invalid-soname /usr/lib/libgdksharpglue.so libgdksharpglue.so E: gtk-sharp invalid-soname /usr/lib/libpangosharpglue.so libpangosharpglue.so >From looking at other mono packages I think this is normal for them. W: gtk-sharp non-executable-in-bin /usr/bin/gconfsharp-schemagen.exe 0644 Should this be 755? W: gtk-sharp strange-permission gtksharp-libdir.patch 0666 The patch should probibly be 644. E: gtk-sharp hardcoded-library-path in %{_prefix}/lib Is this normal for mono packages? W: gtk-sharp mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs Not a blocker, but would be nice to fix. E: gtk-sharp-debuginfo script-without-shellbang /usr/src/debug/gtk-sharp-1.0.10/ glib/glue/error.c Probibly that source file should be 644. W: gtk-sharp-devel summary-not-capitalized pkgconfig file for gtk-sharp Can be ignored. E: gtk-sharp-devel script-without-shellbang /usr/share/doc/gtk-sharp-devel- 1.0.10/HACKING Should be 644. E: gtk-sharp-gapi summary-too-long Glib and GObject C source parser and C generator for the creation and maintenance of managed bindings for Mono and .NET Could boil that down some? W: gtk-sharp-gapi spelling-error-in-description maintainance maintenance Should be fixed. W: gtk-sharp-gapi no-documentation Can be ignored. W: gtk-sharp-gapi non-executable-in-bin /usr/bin/gapi-fixup.exe 0644 W: gtk-sharp-gapi non-executable-in-bin /usr/bin/gapi_codegen.exe 0644 755? W: gtk-sharp-gapi-devel summary-not-capitalized pkgconfig for gapi-sharp W: gtk-sharp-gapi-devel no-documentation Can be ignored. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 19 05:21:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2006 01:21:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207047] Review Request: ed2k_hash - Ed2k file hash calculator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609190521.k8J5LU9k012784@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ed2k_hash - Ed2k file hash calculator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207047 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |panemade at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-09-19 01:21 EST ------- {Not Official Reviewer} packaging looks ok. + Mockbuild is successfull for i386 FC6 + rpmlint on binary rpm is silent - dist tag is NOT present + Buildroot is correct + source URL is correct + BR is correct + License used is GPL + License file COPYING is included + desktop file is handled correctly + MD5 sum on tarball is matching upstream tarball 545d44d5e00078011f41a18e235f4af8 ed2k_hash-0.4.0.tar.gz Remove %doc from gui package as its again installing those files doc files which are laready present in ed2k_hash package. Also after installing ed2k_hash package when i tried to install ed2k_hash-gui, i got error: Failed dependencies: libfltk.so.1.1 is needed by ed2k_hash-gui-0.4.0-1.i386 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 19 05:23:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2006 01:23:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206989] Review Request: twinkle - A SIP Soft Phone In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609190523.k8J5NLrK012964@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: twinkle - A SIP Soft Phone https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206989 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |panemade at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-09-19 01:23 EST ------- {Not Official Reviewer} packaging looks ok. + Mockbuild is successfull for i386 FC6 with some warnings + rpmlint on binary rpm is silent + dist tag is present + Buildroot is correct + source URL is correct + BR is correct + License used is GPL + License file COPYING is included + desktop file is handled correctly + MD5 sum on tarball is matching upstream tarball 245ffd3b4a6f968d8f80d42f6aad079c twinkle-0.8.1.tar.gz + No duplicate files You can use --delete-original with desktop-install-file Instead of writing rm -f ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}%{_datadir}/applications/twinkle.desktop desktop-file-install --vendor fedora \ --dir ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}%{_datadir}/applications \ --add-category X-Fedora \ twinkle.desktop you can write only in SPEC desktop-file-install --vendor fedora \ --delete-original --dir ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}%{_datadir}/applications \ --add-category X-Fedora \ twinkle.desktop Unable to install on FC6 got error: Failed dependencies: libresolv.so.2(GLIBC_PRIVATE) is needed by twinkle-0.8.1-1.fc6.i386 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 19 06:06:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2006 02:06:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207077] New: Review Request: classpath-0.92 - Essential Libraries for Java Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207077 Summary: Review Request: classpath-0.92 - Essential Libraries for Java Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: www.knox.net.nz/~nodoid/classpath-0.92-1jpp SRPM URL: www.knox.net.nz/~nodoid/classpath.spec Description: GNU Classpath, Essential Libraries for Java, is a GNU project to create free core class libraries for use with virtual machines and compilers for the java programming language. Please note, this is my first ever attempt to package a java product, so be gentle with me. The spec file contains two files in the normal %files section with a hard coded /usr/lib. When I compiled it (outside of mock), on my x86_64 box, these two files were created. I have no idea if this is correct or not. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 19 06:10:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2006 02:10:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206989] Review Request: twinkle - A SIP Soft Phone In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609190610.k8J6Arm1015439@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: twinkle - A SIP Soft Phone https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206989 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-09-19 02:10 EST ------- Thanks for the --delete-original tip. Will look at changing that in the next version. I noticed the failed dependency eariler, and was digging further. After much hair pulling I finally found that the lovely 'abicheck' utility can show you what private functions a binary is using, so we see: /usr/bin/twinkle: PRIVATE: (libresolv.so.2:GLIBC_PRIVATE) __ns_name_ntop /usr/bin/twinkle: PRIVATE: (libresolv.so.2:GLIBC_PRIVATE) __ns_get16 Those two will need to get patched/replaced. I will see if upstream can do anything, or if I can come up with a quick patch to fix it. (Or indeed, if anyone watching this bug has a quick fix. ;) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 19 06:24:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2006 02:24:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207047] Review Request: ed2k_hash - Ed2k file hash calculator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609190624.k8J6OKw8015925@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ed2k_hash - Ed2k file hash calculator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207047 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-09-19 02:24 EST ------- my mistake forgot to check fltk-devel package. Ignore Failed dependecies error. Package is working fine. Even desktop file is installed successfully. But remove %doc files from gui package and reupload new version. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 19 06:25:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2006 02:25:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206842] Review Request: seq24 - Real-time MIDI sequencer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609190625.k8J6P1hp015985@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: seq24 - Real-time MIDI sequencer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206842 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |panemade at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-09-19 02:25 EST ------- {Not Official Reviewer} packaging looks ok. + Mockbuild is successfull for i386 FC6 + rpmlint on binary rpm is silent - dist tag is NOT present + Buildroot is correct + source URL is correct + BR is correct + License used is GPL + License file COPYING is included + desktop file is handled correctly + MD5 sum on tarball is matching upstream tarball b2c39dad73f803727c39c2e2e443ebdb seq24-0.8.7.tar.gz + No duplicate files Application got installed correclty. Desktop icon is visible also. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 19 06:45:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2006 02:45:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 173459] Review Request: initng In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609190645.k8J6jVqC017139@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 ------- Additional Comments From daner964 at student.liu.se 2006-09-19 02:45 EST ------- (In reply to comment #316) > The last comment from the submitter has been made 4 months back. I guess we will > give it a week and close this review request. I'm very much alive. The reason I haven't committed anything is there has been nothing to commit. I was starting to think this project was quite dead. So it's a big surprise with a new release! Anyway, I'll look into fixing the spec file up for the new release later today. Another addition to the happy news is that I've got a brand new 64 bit machine (with a C2D processor!), which means I'll be able to try the rpm's out in that environment as well. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 19 07:18:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2006 03:18:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207079] New: Review Request: perl-Cache - The Cache interface Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207079 Summary: Review Request: perl-Cache - The Cache interface Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: pertusus at free.fr QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.environnement.ens.fr/perso/dumas/fc-srpms/perl-Cache.spec SRPM URL: http://www.environnement.ens.fr/perso/dumas/fc-srpms/perl-Cache-2.04-1.src.rpm Description: The Cache modules are designed to assist a developer in persisting data for a specified period of time. Often these modules are used in web applications to store data locally to save repeated and redundant expensive calls to remote machines or databases. The Cache interface is implemented by derived classes that store cached data in different manners (such as as files on a filesystem, or in memory). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 19 07:45:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2006 03:45:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205300] Review Request: gtk-sharp - a set of mono bindings for gtk1.2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609190745.k8J7jDbo021139@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtk-sharp - a set of mono bindings for gtk1.2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205300 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-09-19 03:45 EST ------- (In reply to comment #24) > 3. At first I was getting the: > mono: mono-codeman.c:257: new_codechunk: Assertion `!err' failed. > make[2]: *** [gapi_codegen.exe] Aborted > make[2]: Leaving directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/gtk-sharp-1.0.10/generator' > make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 > make[1]: Leaving directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/gtk-sharp-1.0.10' > make: *** [all] Error 2 > error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.14252 (%build) > > But then I realized the cause. I hadn't disabled selinux on my new build > machine. Mono apparently tries to do something odd to the stack when compiling, > and selinux blocks it. > > Sep 18 22:09:31 thulsadoom kernel: audit(1158638970.725:4300): avc: denied { > execmem } for pid=25215 comm="mono" scontext=user_u:system_r:unconfined_t:s0 > tcontext=user_u:system_r:unconfined_t:s0 tclass=process > > Disabling selinux gets it compiling on both i386 and x86_64... See the Extras/MockTricks wiki page for how to install a local policy module that allows mono to run under mock with SELInux enabled. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 19 07:49:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2006 03:49:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206989] Review Request: twinkle - A SIP Soft Phone In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609190749.k8J7ncb8021549@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: twinkle - A SIP Soft Phone https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206989 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-09-19 03:49 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > Thanks for the --delete-original tip. Will look at changing that in the next > version. > > I noticed the failed dependency eariler, and was digging further. > After much hair pulling I finally found that the lovely 'abicheck' utility can > show you what private functions a binary is using, so we see: > > /usr/bin/twinkle: PRIVATE: (libresolv.so.2:GLIBC_PRIVATE) __ns_name_ntop > /usr/bin/twinkle: PRIVATE: (libresolv.so.2:GLIBC_PRIVATE) __ns_get16 > > Those two will need to get patched/replaced. I will see if upstream can do > anything, or if I can come up with a quick patch to fix it. (Or indeed, if > anyone watching this bug has a quick fix. ;) You may be able to fix it by persuading the configure script that the function isn't available, so that it either doesn't use it or provides a replacement. I did that for __ns_get16 once: ac_cv_func___ns_get16=no export ac_cv_func___ns_get16 ./configure ... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 19 08:01:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2006 04:01:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207082] New: Review Request: perl-Feed-Find - Syndication feed auto-discovery Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207082 Summary: Review Request: perl-Feed-Find - Syndication feed auto- discovery Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: pertusus at free.fr QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.environnement.ens.fr/perso/dumas/fc-srpms/perl-Feed-Find.spec SRPM URL: http://www.environnement.ens.fr/perso/dumas/fc-srpms/perl-Feed-Find-0.06-1.src.rpm Description: Feed::Find implements feed auto-discovery for finding syndication feeds, given a URI. It (currently) passes all of the auto-discovery tests at http://diveintomark.org/tests/client/autodiscovery/. Feed::Find will discover the following feed formats: * RSS 0.91 * RSS 1.0 * RSS 2.0 * Atom -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 19 09:50:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2006 05:50:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206395] Review Request: picocom - Minimal serial communications program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609190950.k8J9oBPr030535@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: picocom - Minimal serial communications program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206395 ------- Additional Comments From denis at poolshark.org 2006-09-19 05:50 EST ------- (don't forget to build your package and close this bug. thx) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 19 11:07:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2006 07:07:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203520] Review Request: evolution-brutus In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609191107.k8JB76x1002924@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: evolution-brutus Alias: evolution-brutus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203520 ------- Additional Comments From colding at omesc.com 2006-09-19 07:07 EST ------- Rebuild. Spec URL: http://www.omesc.com/content/downloads/dist/Fedora%20Core%206/SPECS/evolution-brutus.spec SRPM URL: http://www.omesc.com/content/downloads/dist/Fedora%20Core%206/SRPMS/evolution-brutus-1.1.6-11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 19 11:40:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2006 07:40:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206478] Review Request: Yumdiff - Compares RPMS installed on local and remote systems In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609191140.k8JBedij005548@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Yumdiff - Compares RPMS installed on local and remote systems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206478 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2006-09-19 07:40 EST ------- Done. Spec URL: http://gryffindor.jcomserv.net/yumdiff/yumdiff.spec SRPM URL: http://gryffindor.jcomserv.net/yumdiff/yumdiff-1.0-2.src.rpm Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 19 12:02:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2006 08:02:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189889] Review Request: vkeybd - Virtual MIDI Keyboard In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609191202.k8JC2FpA007467@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vkeybd - Virtual MIDI Keyboard https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189889 ------- Additional Comments From green at redhat.com 2006-09-19 08:02 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > Please ask upstream to add the license and add copyright headers to the > mentioned files. This was the response: "I don't mind to add but am too lazy to release a newer version for such small pieces. The license issue is written in README." So, should I just remove the COPYING file I added and proceed? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 19 12:12:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2006 08:12:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188974] Review Request: mesa-libGLw - Xt / Motif OpenGL widgets In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609191212.k8JCCZJF007916@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mesa-libGLw - Xt / Motif OpenGL widgets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188974 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: libGLw |Review Request: mesa-libGLw | |- Xt / Motif OpenGL widgets ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-09-19 08:12 EST ------- 6. (per comment #25), main pkg missing Provides: libGLw and -devel missing Provides: libGLw-devel 7. OK, since we're back to the original name, a. it should also have the original Version: 6.5 b. a high enough Release: to ensure proper upgrade from last version in Core: %changelog * Thu Jul 27 2006 Mike A. Harris 6.5-20.fc6 - Conditionalized libGLw inclusion with new with_libGLw macro defaulting to 1 (enabled) for now, however since nothing in Fedora Core uses libGLw anymore, we will be transitioning libGLw to an external package maintained in Fedora Extras soon. So, I'd suggest at least Release: 21%{?dist} c. drop Obsoletes: mesa-libGLw Address these remaining items, and I'll APPROVE this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 19 12:18:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2006 08:18:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 173459] Review Request: initng In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609191218.k8JCIshf008219@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 daner964 at student.liu.se changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #129911|0 |1 is obsolete| | ------- Additional Comments From daner964 at student.liu.se 2006-09-19 08:18 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=136626) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=136626&action=view) initng 0.6.8 spec file ...and here's the spec file for 0.6.8. Works as a charm for me, both on i386 and x86_64. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 19 12:22:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2006 08:22:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 173459] Review Request: initng In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609191222.k8JCMhq6008474@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 daner964 at student.liu.se changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #129900|0 |1 is obsolete| | ------- Additional Comments From daner964 at student.liu.se 2006-09-19 08:22 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=136627) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=136627&action=view) initng-ifiles 0.0.6 spec file ...and the accompanying ifiles... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 19 12:31:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2006 08:31:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 173459] Review Request: initng In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609191231.k8JCV8Gs008890@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 ------- Additional Comments From che666 at gmail.com 2006-09-19 08:30 EST ------- summary of problems left i found: 1. suspend doesent work yet (no clue why) 2. squid daemon doesent shutdown properly (needs to be zapped) 3. if vga= kernel boot param is not set tty1 shows cyrillic letters at some point of bootup (no exact clue why) 4. selinux support works but in past versions i tried there was a problem with booting up if selinux is detected to be installed but disabled. besides those small problems id really say its very useable at this point. is there a chance to get it approved now? it doesent break sysvinit and it can peacefully coexist. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 19 12:51:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2006 08:51:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 173459] Review Request: initng In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609191251.k8JCpvaF010673@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 ------- Additional Comments From daner964 at student.liu.se 2006-09-19 08:51 EST ------- (In reply to comment #322) > summary of problems left i found: > > 3. if vga= kernel boot param is not set tty1 shows cyrillic letters at some > point of bootup (no exact clue why) This one is really a pain in my *ss. No idea whatsoever what's wrong with it. Note that it only seems to affect stuff that's not printed out in white, ie it could have something with the ansi colour stuff to do? > 4. selinux support works but in past versions i tried there was a problem with > booting up if selinux is detected to be installed but disabled. This seems familiar. I'm quite sure though that this was fixed months ago. Right, Dragoran? I'm not sure though what happened to the policy stuff (#179761)? > besides those small problems id really say its very useable at this point. > > is there a chance to get it approved now? > > it doesent break sysvinit and it can peacefully coexist. Well, you all know my opinion on this one... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 19 14:16:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2006 10:16:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189889] Review Request: vkeybd - Virtual MIDI Keyboard In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609191416.k8JEGO9X019014@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vkeybd - Virtual MIDI Keyboard https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189889 ------- Additional Comments From opensource at till.name 2006-09-19 10:16 EST ------- just remove your COPYING file and proceed. Hopefully there will be a new release sometime with the file added. Here are some other items that need to be taken care of: - move the .desktop file to a separate file - I think the invocation of "update-desktop-database %{_datadir}/applications" is not needed. According to http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets?highlight=%28update-desktop-database%29#head-de6770dd9867fcd085a73a4700f6bcd0d10294ef it is only need when the .desktop file has an MimeType entry - then you do not need "Requires(post): desktop-file-utils" and "Requires(postun): desktop-file-utils" - I am not sure, but $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_datadir}/icons/vkeybd.png seems not the be the correct location for the icon since on my system all other icons are in subdirectories of icons, e.g. hicolor/ - alsa-lib-devel, jack-audio-connection-kit-devel and e2fsprogs-devel can be removed from BuildRequires since they are already required by lash-devel - tcl-devel can be removed from BuildRequires since it is already required by tk-devel if the versioned dependency can be done with tk-devel instead of tcl-devel and please do not forget the issues in comment 5 and 6 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 19 14:33:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2006 10:33:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204227] Review Request: foremost - Console program to recover files based on their headers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609191433.k8JEXdCe020501@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: foremost - Console program to recover files based on their headers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204227 opensource at till.name changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE CC| |opensource at till.name OtherBugsDependingO|163776 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From opensource at till.name 2006-09-19 10:33 EST ------- I am closing this bug since foremost is already in fedora extras, see #167034 and http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/extras/5/i386/repodata/repoview/foremost-0-1.3-0.1.20060826.fc5.html Daniel, maybe you are using an out-of-sync mirror, you can check this in your yum config. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 167034 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 19 14:34:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2006 10:34:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 167034] Review Request: foremost -- Recover files by "carving" them from a disk image In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609191434.k8JEY4J8020613@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: foremost -- Recover files by "carving" them from a disk image https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=167034 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com opensource at till.name changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-devel at mx-solutions.de ------- Additional Comments From opensource at till.name 2006-09-19 10:33 EST ------- *** Bug 204227 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 19 14:34:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2006 10:34:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201006] Review Request: HelixPlayer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609191434.k8JEYudC020746@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: HelixPlayer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201006 ------- Additional Comments From gauret at free.fr 2006-09-19 10:34 EST ------- Michael, I've read that you have many other things to do at the moment, so here's my take at the modifications : http://gauret.free.fr/fichiers/rpms/fedora/HelixPlayer.spec And the diffs : http://gauret.free.fr/fichiers/rpms/fedora/HelixPlayer.diff I did not manage to make the build system obey $RPM_OPT_FLAGS, this build system is much too complicated for me (and it does not look at the env vars). I think the rest is fixed (except the mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs, it's wrong, there is only tabs to indent) Michael, if you like the changes, just use them, and HelixPlayer will be good to import as far as I'm concerned. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 19 15:24:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2006 11:24:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188974] Review Request: mesa-libGLw - Xt / Motif OpenGL widgets In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609191524.k8JFOGwA026505@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mesa-libGLw - Xt / Motif OpenGL widgets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188974 ------- Additional Comments From ajackson at redhat.com 2006-09-19 11:24 EST ------- Okay. http://people.freedesktop.org/~ajax/fedora/mesa-libGLw/mesa-libGLw-6.5.1-0.1.src.rpm That's already rpmnewer than 6.5.1-0.rc2 that's in core right now; I'll make sure the core libGLw build gets turned off for mesa 6.5.1-1. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 19 15:34:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2006 11:34:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203212] Review Request: libgalago-gtk In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609191534.k8JFYcEj027379@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgalago-gtk https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203212 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 19 15:46:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2006 11:46:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203212] Review Request: libgalago-gtk In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609191546.k8JFkij7028466@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgalago-gtk https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203212 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-09-19 11:46 EST ------- 1. From http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines: * Use rpmlint - rpmlint is not silent. W: libgalago-gtk mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (in src.rpm) W: libgalago-gtk-devel no-documentation - Remove tabs from spec file to unify spacing. - The latter rpmlibt conmplaint can be ignored, I think. * Timestamps - Use: make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT INSTALL="install -c -p" to keep the timestamps of header files in -devel package. 2. From http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines : = Nothing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 19 15:50:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2006 11:50:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188974] Review Request: mesa-libGLw - Xt / Motif OpenGL widgets In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609191550.k8JFoQeQ028676@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mesa-libGLw - Xt / Motif OpenGL widgets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188974 ------- Additional Comments From ajackson at redhat.com 2006-09-19 11:50 EST ------- Oops: http://people.freedesktop.org/~ajax/fedora/mesa-libGLw/mesa-libGLw-6.5.1-0.2.src.rpm Now actually uses the 6.5.1 tarball. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 19 16:00:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2006 12:00:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188974] Review Request: mesa-libGLw - Xt / Motif OpenGL widgets In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609191600.k8JG0F9s029475@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mesa-libGLw - Xt / Motif OpenGL widgets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188974 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-09-19 12:00 EST ------- Good work, APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 19 16:53:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2006 12:53:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206395] Review Request: picocom - Minimal serial communications program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609191653.k8JGrx7V002215@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: picocom - Minimal serial communications program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206395 jafo-redhat at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 19 17:43:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2006 13:43:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207141] New: Review Request: farsight - A audio/video conferencing framework Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207141 Summary: Review Request: farsight - A audio/video conferencing framework Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: bdpepple at ameritech.net QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://piedmont.homelinux.org/fedora/telepathy/farsight.spec SRPM URL: http://piedmont.homelinux.org/fedora/telepathy/farsight-0.1.8-1.src.rpm Description: FarSight is an audio/video conferencing framework specifically designed for Instant Messengers. It aims to provide a code structure that will be able to absorb as many video conferencing protocols as possible. It also offers an interface to those Instant Messengers, allowing them to embed the video feeds and controls into them. FarSight is not a standalone application. It provides two APIs, one for interfacing with the different "protocol modules" and one for interfacing with the Instant Messenger GUI. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 19 19:22:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2006 15:22:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189889] Review Request: vkeybd - Virtual MIDI Keyboard In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609191922.k8JJMlI4016319@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vkeybd - Virtual MIDI Keyboard https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189889 ------- Additional Comments From green at redhat.com 2006-09-19 15:22 EST ------- I've fixed everything mentioned so far and more.... New bits here: Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/green/FE/FC5/vkeybd.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/green/FE/FC5/vkeybd-0.1.17-6.src.rpm Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 19 19:38:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2006 15:38:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205041] Review Request: tellico - collection manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609191938.k8JJce8S018087@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tellico - collection manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205041 ------- Additional Comments From jamatos at fc.up.pt 2006-09-19 15:38 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > Any further progress on this submission? I am sorry. I have been busy with the deadline on FC6 rebuild. > Did you see the suggestions in comment #3? I am commenting them bellow. (In reply to comment #3) > All the changes look good. I don't feel strongly about having KDE in the > Summary. I am using the package under Xfce, so it works fine here. Good. :-) > It's worth noting that due to bug: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202944 > I had to install 28 -devel packages to install this. Thats not this > packages fault however. ;) Good. > Some new rpmlint errors (or perhaps ones I missed the first time): > > E: tellico binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/tellico ['/usr/lib', '/usr/ > lib/qt-3.3/lib'] > > Suggestion: perhaps add '--disable-rpath' to the configure line? Done. > W: tellico dangling-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/tellico/common /usr/share/ > doc/HTML/en/common > W: tellico symlink-should-be-relative /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/tellico/common / > usr/share/doc/HTML/en/common > W: tellico dangling-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/fr/tellico/common /usr/share/ > doc/HTML/fr/common > W: tellico symlink-should-be-relative /usr/share/doc/HTML/fr/tellico/common / > usr/share/doc/HTML/fr/common > > Suggestion: change to relative symlinks? What is the problem with absolute symlinks? I am just asking. In this particular case I get: $ rpm -qf /usr/share/doc/HTML/ fedora-release-5-5 kdelibs-3.5.4-5.0.fc5.kde So the directory is always owned and it is pulled from the requirements. The package with only the symlink issue, and a new upstream release is here: Spec URL: http://www.fc.up.pt/pessoas/jamatos/fedora-extras/tellico.spec SRPM URL: http://www.fc.up.pt/pessoas/jamatos/fedora-extras/tellico-1.2.2-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 19 19:40:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2006 15:40:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206842] Review Request: seq24 - Real-time MIDI sequencer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609191940.k8JJefuL018321@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: seq24 - Real-time MIDI sequencer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206842 ------- Additional Comments From green at redhat.com 2006-09-19 15:40 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > - dist tag is NOT present Thanks. Fixed this... as well as a few other things. Updated bits here: Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/green/FE/devel/seq24.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/green/FE/devel/seq24-0.8.7-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 19 19:44:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2006 15:44:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206398] Review Request: php-pecl-Fileinfo - libmagic bindings In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609191944.k8JJiYk4018840@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pecl-Fileinfo - libmagic bindings https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206398 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-09-19 15:44 EST ------- Everything looks good to me now. I'll bring the issue with the guidelines before the packaging committee. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 19 19:51:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2006 15:51:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206820] Review Request: perl-Term-ProgressBar - Provide a progress meter on a standard terminal In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609191951.k8JJpJEd019633@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Term-ProgressBar - Provide a progress meter on a standard terminal https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206820 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 19 20:05:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2006 16:05:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207173] New: Review Request: pymsn - Python libraries for MSN Messenger network Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207173 Summary: Review Request: pymsn - Python libraries for MSN Messenger network Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: bdpepple at ameritech.net QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://piedmont.homelinux.org/fedora/telepathy/pymsn.spec SRPM URL: http://piedmont.homelinux.org/fedora/telepathy/pymsn-0.2-1.src.rpm Description: pymsn is the library behind the msn connection manager for telepathy. It is a rewrite of the libivy msn library used in the Ivy msn client. pymsn uses the glib mainloop to process the network events in an asynchronous manner -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 19 20:11:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2006 16:11:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207174] New: Review Request: whatmask - Convert between different netmask types and show information Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207174 Summary: Review Request: whatmask - Convert between different netmask types and show information Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rpm at timj.co.uk QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.timj.co.uk/linux/specs/whatmask.spec SRPM URL: http://www.timj.co.uk/linux/srpms/whatmask-1.2-3.src.rpm Description: Whatmask is a small program that can analyze CIDR, netmask, netmask (hex), and wildcard bit notations to give useful information about a given network block in question. It is similar to ipcalc, but provides an easier-to-use interface. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 19 20:27:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2006 16:27:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207174] Review Request: whatmask - Convert between different netmask types and show information In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609192027.k8JKRM19023168@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: whatmask - Convert between different netmask types and show information https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207174 dan at danny.cz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |dan at danny.cz OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From dan at danny.cz 2006-09-19 16:27 EST ------- Could you start with release 1? There is nothing before 3 in the changelog ;-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 19 20:37:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2006 16:37:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207174] Review Request: whatmask - Convert between different netmask types and show information In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609192037.k8JKb6fM024049@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: whatmask - Convert between different netmask types and show information https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207174 ------- Additional Comments From rpm at timj.co.uk 2006-09-19 16:37 EST ------- I'd rather not if possible, because I've already maintained private repos with releases <=2. I can make up some fake changelog entries if it helps, but I figured that was pretty pointless, and the ones that were there were meaningless in the context of a freshly-written spec file. NB rpmlint is quiet on src, i386 and debuginfo. Builds fine in FC5 i386 mock. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 19 20:37:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2006 16:37:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 173459] Review Request: initng In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609192037.k8JKboLN024130@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 denis at poolshark.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|176581 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 19 20:38:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2006 16:38:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 176581] Review Request: fnord -- A very fast HTTP server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609192038.k8JKcoa5024322@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fnord -- A very fast HTTP server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176581 denis at poolshark.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn|173459 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 19 20:40:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2006 16:40:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 176581] Review Request: fnord -- A very fast HTTP server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609192040.k8JKepMg024501@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fnord -- A very fast HTTP server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176581 denis at poolshark.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|gdk at redhat.com |nobody at fedoraproject.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 19 20:42:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2006 16:42:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190343] Review Request: VDR - Video Disk Recorder In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609192042.k8JKghbN024644@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: VDR - Video Disk Recorder https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190343 ville.skytta at iki.fi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |182235 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2006-09-19 16:42 EST ------- As VDR deals with MPEG data from DVB cards, adding blocker on FE-Legal even though I guess there should be no problems as the DVB hardware (or 3rd party plugins not included here) does the actual decoding. For more info, the VDR homepage is http://www.cadsoft.de/vdr/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 19 20:55:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2006 16:55:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199029] Review Request: jokosher In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609192055.k8JKtIfP025625@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jokosher https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199029 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-09-19 16:55 EST ------- Why have you got a binary as SOURCE1 which is installed into %{_bindir}? You cannot include anything prebuilt - you *must* use the sources and was it not possible to use sed or perl to fix the __init__.py file rather than install a fresh one? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 19 21:27:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2006 17:27:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199029] Review Request: jokosher In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609192127.k8JLR0J8029241@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jokosher https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199029 ------- Additional Comments From toshio at tiki-lounge.com 2006-09-19 17:26 EST ------- The SOURCE1 isn't a binary. It's a script. I can see why you're doing that but it is kinda ugly. What's upstream's plans for future releases? Will they include that kind of script? Or make it so Jokosher.py actually can be installed to %{bindir}? Or....? __init__.py might be better as: touch %{buildroot}%{python-sitelib}/%{name}/__init__.py but you have a comment in your changelog about security. Can you explain if touch would be a problem? Putting the png images into %{python-sitelib} isn't a great idea. Is it hard to put them into %{_datadir}/%{name} or something similar? If you use your jokosher script you probably don't want execute permissions on Jokosher.py. I'm not sure about the wisdom of making WaveForm.py exectuable. It loks to me as though directly executing WaveForm.py makes a test case run... so this isn't something someone who installs jokosher is going to want to do. (Correct me if I'm wrong on that.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 19 21:32:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2006 17:32:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207202] New: Review Request: bes - Back-end server software framework for OPeNDAP Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207202 Summary: Review Request: bes - Back-end server software framework for OPeNDAP Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: pertusus at free.fr QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.environnement.ens.fr/perso/dumas/fc-srpms/bes.spec SRPM URL: http://www.environnement.ens.fr/perso/dumas/fc-srpms/bes-3.2.0-1.src.rpm Description: BES is a new, high-performance back-end server software framework for OPeNDAP that allows data providers more flexibility in providing end users views of their data. The current OPeNDAP data objects (DAS, DDS, and DataDDS) are still supported, but now data providers can add new data views, provide new functionality, and new features to their end users through the BES modular design. Providers can add new data handlers, new data objects/views, the ability to define views with constraints and aggregation, the ability to add reporting mechanisms, initialization hooks, and more. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 19 21:33:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2006 17:33:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207077] Review Request: classpath-0.92 - Essential Libraries for Java In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609192133.k8JLXU3u029973@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: classpath-0.92 - Essential Libraries for Java https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207077 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-09-19 17:33 EST ------- Spec URL: www.knox.net.nz/~nodoid/classpath-0.92-2jpp SRPM URL: www.knox.net.nz/~nodoid/classpath.spec A couple of rpmlint fixes. I'll remove the jpp suffix next spin -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 19 21:46:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2006 17:46:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205041] Review Request: tellico - collection manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609192146.k8JLk2aj031520@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tellico - collection manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205041 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-09-19 17:45 EST ------- > What is the problem with absolute symlinks? I am just asking. Well, rpmlint says: symlink-should-be-relative : Absolute symlinks are problematic eg. when working with chroot environments. While it would be good to sometime fix this, I don't guess it's a blocker, as many other kde packages do the same thing and I don't know how many people would use the package in a chroot. You might investigate if it would be easy to fix. Everything else looks good, so this package is APPROVED. Don't forget to close this bug with NEXTRELEASE once the package has been imported and built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 19 22:00:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2006 18:00:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207077] Review Request: classpath-0.92 - Essential Libraries for Java In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609192200.k8JM0cnS032357@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: classpath-0.92 - Essential Libraries for Java https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207077 ville.skytta at iki.fi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fnasser at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2006-09-19 18:00 EST ------- Parts of GNU Classpath are already being shipped in Core, eg. gnu-crypto. Maybe it would be beneficial to try and combine efforts somehow? Are there any potential issues with gcj if the same but possibly subtly different versions of the same class (eg. from gnu-crypto and classpath) end up in the same classloader? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 19 22:06:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2006 18:06:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207077] Review Request: classpath-0.92 - Essential Libraries for Java In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609192206.k8JM6u2T032746@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: classpath-0.92 - Essential Libraries for Java https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207077 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-09-19 18:06 EST ------- I would imagine that if classpath is newer than the bits already in core, then they will be used in preference to the existing ones. As to what damage that may cause, I have no idea. I do know though that gcj is not up to the job to compile ikvm or limewire... I'm all for co-operating as well :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 19 22:14:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2006 18:14:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 195683] Review Request: smarteiffel - The GNU Eiffel Compiler and Libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609192214.k8JMEUdY000778@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: smarteiffel - The GNU Eiffel Compiler and Libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195683 ------- Additional Comments From gemi at bluewin.ch 2006-09-19 18:14 EST ------- Ok, I removed the execute bits from the files in docdir. http://math.ifi.unizh.ch/fedora/5/i386/SRPMS.gemi/smarteiffel-2.2-4.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 19 22:16:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2006 18:16:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193059] Review Request: ibmasm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609192216.k8JMGpqS000874@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ibmasm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193059 ------- Additional Comments From konradr at redhat.com 2006-09-19 18:16 EST ------- >make _LIB=%{_libdir} ROOT=${RPM_BUILD_ROOT} install >Will the package not let you use make DEST_DIR=%{buildroot} install? That is correct. It has the ROOT defined. > [... other reviews ... ] I fixed the dependency, permissions, globbed the ibms* SPEC URL:http://ibmasm.cvs.sourceforge.net/*checkout*/ibmasm/ibmasm/ibmasm.spec SRPMS URL: http://osdn.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/ibmasm/ibmasm-3.0-11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 19 22:21:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2006 18:21:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189889] Review Request: vkeybd - Virtual MIDI Keyboard In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609192221.k8JML0eb001038@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vkeybd - Virtual MIDI Keyboard https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189889 ------- Additional Comments From opensource at till.name 2006-09-19 18:20 EST ------- The specfile is not up to date. The requires for gtk should be removed, see: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets#head-7103f6c38d1b5735e8477bdd569ad73ea2c49bda -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 19 22:27:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2006 18:27:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189889] Review Request: vkeybd - Virtual MIDI Keyboard In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609192227.k8JMRgD4001345@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vkeybd - Virtual MIDI Keyboard https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189889 ------- Additional Comments From green at redhat.com 2006-09-19 18:27 EST ------- (In reply to comment #11) > The requires for gtk should be removed, see: D'oh! Thanks for pointing that out. New bits here: Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/green/FE/FC5/vkeybd.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/green/FE/FC5/vkeybd-0.1.17-7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 19 22:30:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2006 18:30:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 173459] Review Request: initng In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609192230.k8JMUsMj001571@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|gdk at redhat.com |nobody at fedoraproject.org OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |176581 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-09-19 18:30 EST ------- Something bad happened to the blockers on this bug. I think it's supposed to block 176581 (the fnord review) but now it's blocking both FE-NEW and FE-REVIEW, which is obviously bogus. It's not assigned to anyone, so I don't think FE-REVIEW is accurate. I've set things the way I'm guessing they're supposed to be; if that's not correct then please set it properly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 19 22:31:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2006 18:31:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 176581] Review Request: fnord -- A very fast HTTP server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609192231.k8JMVQ5h001672@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fnord -- A very fast HTTP server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176581 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |173459 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 19 22:40:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2006 18:40:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206842] Review Request: seq24 - Real-time MIDI sequencer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609192240.k8JMeT8t002337@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: seq24 - Real-time MIDI sequencer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206842 ------- Additional Comments From green at redhat.com 2006-09-19 18:40 EST ------- One more little fix (to Requires(post,postun))... Updated bits here: Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/green/FE/devel/seq24.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/green/FE/devel/seq24-0.8.7-3.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 19 23:09:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2006 19:09:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207047] Review Request: ed2k_hash - Ed2k file hash calculator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609192309.k8JN9WWN004699@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ed2k_hash - Ed2k file hash calculator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207047 ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2006-09-19 19:09 EST ------- But the GUI version is independent of the CLI one. So it's perfectly possible to have only the GUI version installed. The user would be left without docs in that case. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 19 23:17:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2006 19:17:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206820] Review Request: perl-Term-ProgressBar - Provide a progress meter on a standard terminal In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609192317.k8JNHK1G005314@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Term-ProgressBar - Provide a progress meter on a standard terminal https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206820 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-09-19 19:17 EST ------- * source files match upstream: 440dfd04fe51a12d314e9adf2445f04a Term-ProgressBar-2.09.tar.gz * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * dist tag is present. * build root is correct. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. License text not included upstream. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * package installs properly * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: perl(Term::ProgressBar) = 2.09 perl-Term-ProgressBar = 2.09-1.fc6 = perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8) perl(Carp) perl(Class::MethodMaker) >= 1.02 perl(Fatal) perl(POSIX) perl(base) perl(constant) perl(strict) perl(vars) * %check is present and all tests pass: All tests successful. Files=8, Tests=99, 11 wallclock secs ( 0.60 cusr + 0.19 csys = 0.79 CPU) * package is not relocatable. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 19 23:33:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2006 19:33:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206824] Review Request: perl-POE-API-Peek - Peek into the internals of a running POE environment In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609192333.k8JNXFps006283@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-POE-API-Peek - Peek into the internals of a running POE environment https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206824 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 19 23:40:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2006 19:40:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205041] Review Request: tellico - collection manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609192340.k8JNefxS006732@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tellico - collection manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205041 jamatos at fc.up.pt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From jamatos at fc.up.pt 2006-09-19 19:40 EST ------- Imported and built. Thanks for the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 19 23:47:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2006 19:47:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189889] Review Request: vkeybd - Virtual MIDI Keyboard In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609192347.k8JNlTKH007079@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vkeybd - Virtual MIDI Keyboard https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189889 opensource at till.name changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |opensource at till.name OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From opensource at till.name 2006-09-19 19:47 EST ------- It is too late for me to do a complete review now but there are still some minor issues: - please do not use a full path in the .desktop file in the Exec line because this make the path to the binary hardcoded. - there are some warnings in build.log in mock: sffile.c:122: warning: ignoring return value of 'fread', declared with attribute warn_unused_result - see them all in the attachment. - ChangeLog is not packaged - did you ask upstream to include your icon / desktop files? There is already an desktop file in the upstream tarball, so maybe upstream will include your improved desktop file. - the lash patch does not patch the README properly(LADCCA is still mentioned): - --ladcca bool + --lash bool Specify the support of LADCCA. Give yes or no as the - the manpage does not mention the --lash option (the upstream version not the --ladcca option) - have you submitted lash patch to upstream? (Just out of curiosity, what are the advantages of lash against ladcca? - some files have strange permissions, but I don't know whether or not this needs to be fixed: $ rpm -vql vkeybd | grep -- -r--r--r -r--r--r-- 1 root root 2278 Sep 19 23:41 /usr/share/man/man1/vkeybd.1.gz -r--r--r-- 1 root root 5765 Sep 19 23:41 /usr/share/vkeybd/vkeybd.list -r--r--r-- 1 root root 282 Sep 19 23:41 /usr/share/vkeybd/vkeybdmap -r--r--r-- 1 root root 590 Sep 19 23:41 /usr/share/vkeybd/vkeybdmap-german - changing %{_datadir}/vkeybd to %{_datadir}/vkeybd/ in %files makes it more obvious that an directory is meant -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 19 23:49:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2006 19:49:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206824] Review Request: perl-POE-API-Peek - Peek into the internals of a running POE environment In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609192349.k8JNnVXm007226@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-POE-API-Peek - Peek into the internals of a running POE environment https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206824 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-09-19 19:49 EST ------- * source files match upstream: 2655a284b329ad8036ab4de3bbdd7f14 POE-API-Peek-1.06.tar.gz * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * dist tag is present. * build root is correct. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. License text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper (BR: perl is unnecessary) * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * package installs properly * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: perl(POE::API::Peek) = 1.0594 perl-POE-API-Peek = 1.06-1.fc6 = perl >= 0:5.006001 perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8) perl(Devel::Size) perl(POE) perl(POE::Queue::Array) perl(strict) perl(warnings) * %check is present and all tests pass: All tests successful. Files=9, Tests=102, 1 wallclock secs ( 0.70 cusr + 0.23 csys = 0.93 CPU) * package is not relocatable. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 19 23:56:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2006 19:56:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189889] Review Request: vkeybd - Virtual MIDI Keyboard In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609192356.k8JNu7Fh007457@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vkeybd - Virtual MIDI Keyboard https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189889 ------- Additional Comments From opensource at till.name 2006-09-19 19:56 EST ------- Just noticed something else: You can remove these lines from your spec --add-category Application --add-category AudioVideo and add to the .desktop file: Categories=Application;AudioVideo; or Categories=Application;AudioVideo;Audio;Midi;Music; This makes the .desktop file even more useful for inclusion in upstream. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 19 23:57:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2006 19:57:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189889] Review Request: vkeybd - Virtual MIDI Keyboard In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609192357.k8JNveic007503@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vkeybd - Virtual MIDI Keyboard https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189889 ------- Additional Comments From opensource at till.name 2006-09-19 19:57 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=136691) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=136691&action=view) mock build.log from revision 6 for development -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 20 00:19:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2006 20:19:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 173459] Review Request: initng In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609200019.k8K0J8LS008612@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 ------- Additional Comments From denis at poolshark.org 2006-09-19 20:19 EST ------- My bad, no cookies for me. Thanks for fixing. Considering this review has near 350 (!) comments, it should probably be assigned to someone (with sponsor privileges). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 20 00:24:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2006 20:24:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206820] Review Request: perl-Term-ProgressBar - Provide a progress meter on a standard terminal In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609200024.k8K0Owtg008925@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Term-ProgressBar - Provide a progress meter on a standard terminal https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206820 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-09-19 20:24 EST ------- +Import to CVS +Add to owners.list +Bump release, build for devel +devel build succeeds +Request branching (FC-5) +Close bug Thanks for the review! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 20 00:26:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2006 20:26:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206824] Review Request: perl-POE-API-Peek - Peek into the internals of a running POE environment In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609200026.k8K0QLxG008999@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-POE-API-Peek - Peek into the internals of a running POE environment https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206824 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-09-19 20:26 EST ------- +Import to CVS +Add to owners.list +Bump release, build for devel +devel build succeeds +Request branching (FC-5) +Close bug Thanks for the review! :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 20 00:27:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2006 20:27:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205057] Review Request: dx-samples - OpenDX Examples In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609200027.k8K0RiNn009164@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dx-samples - OpenDX Examples https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205057 paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | rpm at greysector.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-09-19 16:46 EST ------- Review License good Upstream and source tarballs md5sums match Spec in UTF-8, US English and is readable Mock is happy as is rpmlint Consistent use of macros No problems with it being noarch Contains clean section No directory ownership problems Includes documentation APPROVED ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2006-09-19 20:27 EST ------- Looks like we both missed some missing BuildRequires. Anyway, fixed, built for devel and FC-5 branch requested. Thanks for the review! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 20 00:43:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2006 20:43:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206985] Review Request: perl-Device-SerialPort In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609200043.k8K0hAgp010093@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Device-SerialPort https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206985 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-09-19 20:43 EST ------- The build fails in mock due to failing tests: + /usr/bin/perl Makefile.PL INSTALLDIRS=vendor 'OPTIMIZE=-O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64 -mtune=generic' Could not find a serial port to use for testing. Please specify one on the 'perl Makefile.PL' command line, like so: perl Makefile.PL /dev/ttyS0 Trying to find a serial port for testing... (use 'perl Makefile.PL TESTPORT=' to override this search) checking '/dev/ttyS1' ... nope checking '/dev/cua01' ... nope checking '/dev/cua/b' ... nope checking '/dev/tty1' ... nope checking '/dev/tty.modem' ... nope error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.71516 (%build) RPM build errors: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.71516 (%build) Error building package from perl-Device-SerialPort-1.002-1.fc6.src.rpm, See build log Now, it's obvious that you've disabled the %check section but it seems that Makefile.PL insists on trying to figure out which serial port should be tested just in case 'make test' is run later. Dumb. Tacking "TESTPORT=/dev/null" onto the Makefile.PL line gets things building. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 20 02:50:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2006 22:50:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206985] Review Request: perl-Device-SerialPort In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609200250.k8K2ojfZ016511@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Device-SerialPort https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206985 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-09-19 22:50 EST ------- After the above fix, everything builds fine. rpmlint says: W: perl-Device-SerialPort make-check-outside-check-section #make test This is bogus, but if you remove the commenting from the %check line it goes away. Fix it if you like. The license should be "GPL or Artistic"; that's the usual way to indicate the oft-seen "same as perl" terms. * source files match upstream: aeef199bfdd2aece043649a0673146d5 Device-SerialPort-1.002.tar.gz * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * dist tag is present. * build root is correct. X license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. License text not included upstream. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper (none) * compiler flags are appropriate. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * package installs properly * debuginfo package looks complete. * rpmlint has only bogus complaints * final provides and requires are sane: SerialPort.so()(64bit) perl(Device::SerialPort) = 1.002 perl-Device-SerialPort = 1.002-1.fc6 = /usr/bin/perl perl >= 0:5.006 perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8) perl(Carp) perl(Device::SerialPort) perl(Exporter) perl(IO::Handle) perl(POSIX) perl(XSLoader) perl(strict) perl(vars) perl(warnings) * %check is necessarily disabled. * no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. * package is not relocatable. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no libtool .la droppings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 20 03:49:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2006 23:49:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207079] Review Request: perl-Cache - The Cache interface In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609200349.k8K3nm8v020959@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Cache - The Cache interface https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207079 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |cweyl at alumni.drew.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 20 04:52:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2006 00:52:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207079] Review Request: perl-Cache - The Cache interface In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609200452.k8K4q4xe023512@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Cache - The Cache interface https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207079 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-09-20 00:52 EST ------- Auto-requires misses a dep on perl(Tie::Hash) due to a use base construct, but Tie::Hash is a core module. There are three missing BR's, listed below. For the purposes of this review, I'm assuming they're in there (and added them). + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license field matches the actual license. + license is open source-compatible. License text not included upstream + source files match upstream: c64b8dd8f04e101bd20cde0c7c2e3d17 Cache-2.04.tar.gz c64b8dd8f04e101bd20cde0c7c2e3d17 Cache-2.04.tar.gz.srpm + latest version is being packaged. X BuildRequires are proper. Date::Parse => 2.24, Heap::Fibonacci => 0.01, Digest::SHA1 => 2.01, O builds in mock, with additional br's added. + rpmlint is silent. O final provides and requires are sane: ** perl-Cache-2.04-1.fc5.noarch.rpm == rpmlint == provides perl(Cache) = 2.04 perl(Cache::Entry) = 2.04 perl(Cache::File) = 2.04 perl(Cache::File::Entry) = 2.04 perl(Cache::File::Handle) perl(Cache::File::Heap) = 2.04 perl(Cache::IOString) perl(Cache::Memory) = 2.04 perl(Cache::Memory::Entry) = 2.04 perl(Cache::Memory::HeapElem) perl(Cache::Null) = 2.04 perl(Cache::Null::Entry) = 2.04 perl(Cache::RemovalStrategy) = 2.04 perl(Cache::RemovalStrategy::FIFO) perl(Cache::RemovalStrategy::LRU) perl(Cache::Tester) = 2.04 perl-Cache = 2.04-1.fc5 == requires perl >= 0:5.006 perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8) perl(Cache) perl(Cache::File) perl(Cache::File::Entry) perl(Cache::File::Heap) perl(Cache::IOString) perl(Cache::Memory) perl(Cache::Memory::Entry) perl(Cache::Memory::HeapElem) perl(Cache::Null::Entry) perl(Carp) perl(DB_File) perl(Date::Parse) perl(Digest::SHA1) perl(Exporter) perl(Fcntl) perl(File::NFSLock) perl(File::Path) perl(File::Spec) perl(File::Temp) perl(Heap::Elem) perl(Heap::Fibonacci) perl(IO::File) perl(IO::String) perl(Storable) perl(Symbol) perl(Test::More) perl(base) perl(fields) perl(strict) perl(vars) perl(warnings) perl(warnings::register) + no shared libraries are present. + package is not relocatable. + owns the directories it creates. + doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + %clean is present. + %check is present and all tests pass: All tests successful. Files=11, Tests=590, 25 wallclock secs ( 2.10 cusr + 1.24 csys = 3.34 CPU) + no scriptlets present. + code, not content. + documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. + %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. + no headers. + no pkgconfig files. + no libtool .la droppings. + not a GUI app. + not a web app. APPROVED, provided the missing BR's are added. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 20 07:13:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2006 03:13:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207174] Review Request: whatmask - Convert between different netmask types and show information In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609200713.k8K7DEox029440@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: whatmask - Convert between different netmask types and show information https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207174 dan at danny.cz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From dan at danny.cz 2006-09-20 03:13 EST ------- OK, then you could put a note in the changelog for 1.2-3 - something like "derived from private version 1.2-2" Review: - no rpmlint output on any package - package name OK - spec file name OK, is in English and is legible - package meets the Packaging Guidelines - license OK (GPL) and is included - source matches upstream 26aeff74dbba70262ccd426e681dcf4a whatmask-1.2.tar.gz 26aeff74dbba70262ccd426e681dcf4a whatmask-1.2.tar.gz.1 - compiles and builds at least on i386 (devel) - no BuildRequires needed - no localized files - has no shared lib - do not create any directory - no duplicates files, permissions are set properly, uses %defattr - has %clean section - consistent use of macros - contains code - no large docs, %doc is not required during runtime - no devel subpackage required, no pkgconfig file - no .la libtool archives - not a GUI application - it works APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 20 07:59:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2006 03:59:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205755] Review Request: elsa - manages group of processes and allows accounting In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609200759.k8K7xqH4000984@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: elsa - manages group of processes and allows accounting https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205755 ------- Additional Comments From guillaume.thouvenin at bull.net 2006-09-20 03:59 EST ------- I removed the FE-NEW blocker because I didn't see the link between ELSA and the BUG #163776. As nobody reviewed ELSA I thought that it was due to the blocker. I was wrong and thank you for re-adding it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 20 08:42:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2006 04:42:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189889] Review Request: vkeybd - Virtual MIDI Keyboard In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609200842.k8K8gRqW005396@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vkeybd - Virtual MIDI Keyboard https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189889 ------- Additional Comments From opensource at till.name 2006-09-20 04:42 EST ------- The 0444 permission on some files do not need to be changed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 20 08:57:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2006 04:57:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207047] Review Request: ed2k_hash - Ed2k file hash calculator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609200857.k8K8vUGG006759@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ed2k_hash - Ed2k file hash calculator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207047 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-09-20 04:57 EST ------- Ok. I got that. I thought you want to create 2 packages. Anyway everything is OK now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 20 09:03:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2006 05:03:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206842] Review Request: seq24 - Real-time MIDI sequencer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609200903.k8K93Pbi007187@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: seq24 - Real-time MIDI sequencer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206842 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-09-20 05:03 EST ------- Change Source: http://filter24.org/seq24/seq24-0.8.7.tar.gz to Source: http://filter24.org/seq24/seq24-%{version}.tar.gz Try to avoid hardcoding version in Source URL. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 20 09:17:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2006 05:17:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 176697] Review Request: i386-rtems4.7-binutils In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609200917.k8K9HZ65008098@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: i386-rtems4.7-binutils https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176697 denis at poolshark.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|gdk at redhat.com |nobody at fedoraproject.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 20 09:18:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2006 05:18:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207079] Review Request: perl-Cache - The Cache interface In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609200918.k8K9IPOJ008145@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Cache - The Cache interface https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207079 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-09-20 05:18 EST ------- BuildRequires added, imported, built for devel, added in owners.list. Thanks for the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 20 10:03:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2006 06:03:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207265] New: Review Request: python-zope-interface - Zope interfaces package Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207265 Summary: Review Request: python-zope-interface - Zope interfaces package Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: paul at city-fan.org QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.city-fan.org/~paul/extras/python-zope-interface/python-zope-interface.spec SRPM URL: http://www.city-fan.org/~paul/extras/python-zope-interface/python-zope-interface-3.0.1-5.src.rpm Description: This is a separate distribution of the zope.interface package used in Zope 3. It is a dependency of the Twisted 2.x stack (see Bug #171543). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 20 10:08:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2006 06:08:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207265] Review Request: python-zope-interface - Zope interfaces package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609201008.k8KA80wk012151@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-zope-interface - Zope interfaces package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207265 paul at city-fan.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |171543 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 20 10:14:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2006 06:14:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 175433] Review Request: tor - Anonymizing overlay network for TCP (The onion router) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609201014.k8KAEpR9012731@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tor - Anonymizing overlay network for TCP (The onion router) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175433 denis at poolshark.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |nobody at fedoraproject.org ------- Additional Comments From denis at poolshark.org 2006-09-20 06:14 EST ------- I would like to see tor make it into Fedora Extras, and this being one of the oldest review in bugzilla I would like to review this and get it over with. Is there anyway you would agree to simplify your spec file, merge the core and lsb subpackages into the main one and remove the other subpackages that aren't directly relevent to Fedora (at this point). I would recommend a simpler approach for now, to speed up the review, and add support for newer init-replacement only when they make it into FE. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 20 11:08:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2006 07:08:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 175433] Review Request: tor - Anonymizing overlay network for TCP (The onion router) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609201108.k8KB8WP2016111@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tor - Anonymizing overlay network for TCP (The onion router) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175433 ------- Additional Comments From enrico.scholz at informatik.tu-chemnitz.de 2006-09-20 07:08 EST ------- no; the part which requires lvm2, udev or e2fsprogs will be always in another (sub)package than the tor-server which works perfectly without them. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 20 11:22:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2006 07:22:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206478] Review Request: Yumdiff - Compares RPMS installed on local and remote systems In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609201122.k8KBMtx9016917@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Yumdiff - Compares RPMS installed on local and remote systems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206478 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2006-09-20 07:22 EST ------- Jon, are you actively working on improving yumdiff? I am having serious doubts if this script in its current shape is ready for inclusion in FE. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 20 11:52:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2006 07:52:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 175433] Review Request: tor - Anonymizing overlay network for TCP (The onion router) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609201152.k8KBqC4H019301@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tor - Anonymizing overlay network for TCP (The onion router) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175433 denis at poolshark.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG ------- Additional Comments From denis at poolshark.org 2006-09-20 07:52 EST ------- Hmm, this seems overkill, especially since lvm2, udev and e2fsprogs are pretty basic packages. Tor is a pretty small and simple package to start with. All other distributions ship it as a single package, including the RHEL43 packages directly provided by upstream. Also, torify requires tsocks which is not currently available. Were you planning to submit tsocks as well ? If not, we need to close this bug with a WONTFIX or DEFERRED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 20 11:54:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2006 07:54:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 175433] Review Request: tor - Anonymizing overlay network for TCP (The onion router) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609201154.k8KBsEbB019457@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tor - Anonymizing overlay network for TCP (The onion router) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175433 denis at poolshark.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |NEW Keywords| |Reopened Resolution|NOTABUG | ------- Additional Comments From denis at poolshark.org 2006-09-20 07:53 EST ------- Sorry, closing the bug was accidental. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 20 11:56:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2006 07:56:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 175433] Review Request: tor - Anonymizing overlay network for TCP (The onion router) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609201156.k8KBuGkc019660@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tor - Anonymizing overlay network for TCP (The onion router) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175433 denis at poolshark.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |denis at poolshark.org OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 20 12:18:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2006 08:18:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 175433] Review Request: tor - Anonymizing overlay network for TCP (The onion router) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609201218.k8KCIxwx020882@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tor - Anonymizing overlay network for TCP (The onion router) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175433 ------- Additional Comments From enrico.scholz at informatik.tu-chemnitz.de 2006-09-20 08:18 EST ------- I will merge packages when you show me that tor requires lvm2, udev or e2fsprogs. Else, I see at me own systems that 'tor' works perfectly without them so I assume they are optional. The '-tsocks' subpackage won't be built be default; when you really want it, I can remove any traces of it out of the spec-file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 20 14:57:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2006 10:57:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207047] Review Request: ed2k_hash - Ed2k file hash calculator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609201457.k8KEvj0n000987@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ed2k_hash - Ed2k file hash calculator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207047 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 20 15:01:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2006 11:01:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207292] New: Review Request: ruby-racc - LALR(1) Parser Generator Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207292 Summary: Review Request: ruby-racc - LALR(1) Parser Generator Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: dlutter at redhat.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/dlutter/yum/spec/ruby-racc.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/dlutter/yum/SRPMS/ruby-racc-1.4.5-2.src.rpm Description: Racc is Ruby yACC. It is written in Ruby and generates ruby code. Now almost all functions of yacc are implemented. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 20 15:21:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2006 11:21:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207047] Review Request: ed2k_hash - Ed2k file hash calculator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609201521.k8KFLr5x003489@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ed2k_hash - Ed2k file hash calculator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207047 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-09-20 11:21 EST ------- I will review this. Well; 1. From http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines : * Tags - Add %{?dist} tag. * Encoding - I recommend that the encoding of AUTHORS file is changed from ISO-8859-1 to UTF-8. * Desktop files - Well, I recommend that some icon is installed in -gui package, make desktop file have the entry of the icon name. Perhaps you may get some image file from upstream. If you do so, write it to spec file where you got the image file. If some image conversion is needed (for example, making image file smaller), you can do so and then include the image file to -gui package (then write to the spec file what you have done). 2. From http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines : = Nothing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 20 15:22:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2006 11:22:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207079] Review Request: perl-Cache - The Cache interface In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609201522.k8KFM25f003504@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Cache - The Cache interface https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207079 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-09-20 11:21 EST ------- Any chance of a FC-5 branch? This would be quite useful on a box of mine :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 20 15:25:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2006 11:25:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206693] Review Request: KTechlab - Development and simulation of microcontrollers and electronic circuits In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609201525.k8KFP70C003686@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: KTechlab - Development and simulation of microcontrollers and electronic circuits https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206693 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-09-20 11:25 EST ------- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 20 15:39:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2006 11:39:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192434] Review Request: compiz-quinn In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609201539.k8KFd6d1004923@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compiz-quinn https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192434 ------- Additional Comments From sundaram at redhat.com 2006-09-20 11:39 EST ------- Apparently this has become a fork and renamed http://www.compiz.net/topic-4562-1.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 20 15:46:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2006 11:46:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201779] Review Request: xfsdump In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609201546.k8KFksVG005926@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xfsdump https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201779 cattelan at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE Fixed In Version| |FC6 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 20 16:08:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2006 12:08:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206985] Review Request: perl-Device-SerialPort In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609201608.k8KG8QVr008592@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Device-SerialPort https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206985 ------- Additional Comments From orion at cora.nwra.com 2006-09-20 12:08 EST ------- Updated spec (and srpm): http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/perl-Device-SerialPort.spec http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/perl-Device-SerialPort-1.002-1.fc5.src.rpm * Wed Sep 20 2006 Orion Poplawski 1.002-2 - Add TESTPORT=/dev/null for mock builds - License back to GPL or Artistic -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 20 16:14:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2006 12:14:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207077] Review Request: classpath-0.92 - Essential Libraries for Java In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609201614.k8KGEJvj009624@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: classpath-0.92 - Essential Libraries for Java https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207077 ------- Additional Comments From fitzsim at redhat.com 2006-09-20 12:14 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > As to what damage that may cause, I have no idea. I do know though that gcj is > not up to the job to compile ikvm or limewire... If your goal is to package LimeWire for Fedora Core, then the easiest way is likely to fix whatever GCJ problems are preventing you from building it. Limewire >= 4.13 requires Java 1.5 so it probably won't be buildable until FC-7, but in the meantime we should package 4.12: svn co http://limewire.org/svn/limewire/branches/bugfix-4-12-branch limewire cd limewire/core ant cd ../gui ant That builds fine on my i686 Rawhide test machine, using the system-installed ecj/libgcj. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 20 16:43:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2006 12:43:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207313] New: Review Request: php-pear-PHP-Compat - Provides missing functionality for older versions of PHP Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207313 Summary: Review Request: php-pear-PHP-Compat - Provides missing functionality for older versions of PHP Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: Fedora at FamilleCollet.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://remi.collet.free.fr/rpms/extras/php-pear-PHP-Compat.spec SRPM URL: http://remi.collet.free.fr/rpms/extras/php-pear-PHP-Compat-1.5.0-1.fc5.src.rpm Description: PHP_Compat provides missing functionality for older versions of PHP. This include fonctions and constants. Note : on FC5, with php-5.1.x, this extension provides only 1 fonction (bcinvert) from php-5.2.0. I think it still useful for some apps with requires it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 20 17:00:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2006 13:00:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 175433] Review Request: tor - Anonymizing overlay network for TCP (The onion router) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609201700.k8KH0XkD019620@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tor - Anonymizing overlay network for TCP (The onion router) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175433 ------- Additional Comments From paul at xelerance.com 2006-09-20 13:00 EST ------- It seems this package is dead locked, and no one wants to approve this package due to the separate sub packages. I submitted a package, which had the approval of the tor developers upstream, but it was submitted a day after this package, so was resolved as duplicate. This issue should be discussed on the fedora-extras list and resolved one way or another. The result of the current deadlock is that there is no tor pacakge whatsoever in Fedora, which is not right. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 20 17:19:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2006 13:19:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 175433] Review Request: tor - Anonymizing overlay network for TCP (The onion router) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609201719.k8KHJY7N021951@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tor - Anonymizing overlay network for TCP (The onion router) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175433 ------- Additional Comments From denis at poolshark.org 2006-09-20 13:19 EST ------- One more question: does it make sense to package tor without the torify wrapper script ? (which requires tsocks, http://tsocks.sourceforge.net/, which we don't have). Wouldn't it make sense to first submit tsocks in a seperate review, THEN submit tor when that's available ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 20 17:21:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2006 13:21:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198839] Review Request: sear - WorldForge client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609201721.k8KHLg0r022113@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sear - WorldForge client Alias: sear https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198839 ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2006-09-20 13:21 EST ------- wfut has now been built and pushed for FE6. There shouldn't be any more packages blocking this review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 20 17:26:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2006 13:26:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202946] Review Request: aqsis - 3D Rendering system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609201726.k8KHQ4Nt022412@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aqsis - 3D Rendering system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202946 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2006-09-20 13:26 EST ------- I'm good with either 1 or 3 as well, and absent any guidelines to the contrary am more than willing to defer to you on this :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 20 17:39:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2006 13:39:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198839] Review Request: sear - WorldForge client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609201739.k8KHdq5I024159@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sear - WorldForge client Alias: sear https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198839 ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2006-09-20 13:39 EST ------- Still waiting on libmodelfile... No FC5 packages? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 20 17:44:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2006 13:44:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 175433] Review Request: tor - Anonymizing overlay network for TCP (The onion router) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609201744.k8KHiT7j024491@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tor - Anonymizing overlay network for TCP (The onion router) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175433 ------- Additional Comments From opensource at till.name 2006-09-20 13:44 EST ------- I would prefer having tsocks and torify in Extras. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 20 17:45:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2006 13:45:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198839] Review Request: sear - WorldForge client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609201745.k8KHjNUx024565@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sear - WorldForge client Alias: sear https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198839 ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2006-09-20 13:45 EST ------- I haven't built libmodelfile yet because I'm giving Ralf and Hans one more chance to clarify the licensing problem. I just sent them email, and I'll consider it a non-issue if I don't hear back from them soon. I won't be building this (or any of the WorldForge packages) on FC5, only FC6. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 20 17:46:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2006 13:46:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 175433] Review Request: tor - Anonymizing overlay network for TCP (The onion router) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609201746.k8KHkLb5024675@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tor - Anonymizing overlay network for TCP (The onion router) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175433 ------- Additional Comments From enrico.scholz at informatik.tu-chemnitz.de 2006-09-20 13:46 EST ------- I do not think that it is deadlocked; 'initng' is probably going soon into FE (AMD64 issues were main blocker and packager has AMD64 machine now), so we have the multi-initsystem soon. It would be good too, when reviewers do not insist on personal views and *requesting* their will. Statements like "others are doing it so" are valid comments, but without reasons they are just comments, and not a blocker. And yes; it makes sense to package tor without tsocks support. Even when tsocks would be available, the corresponding tor-wrapper must be in an own subpackage due to the additional dependencies. The 'tsocks' wrapper might be a nice feature but not required so it can be ommitted for now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 20 18:11:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2006 14:11:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203288] Review Request: devilspie In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609201811.k8KIBUQQ026233@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: devilspie https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203288 ml at deadbabylon.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |CANTFIX ------- Additional Comments From ml at deadbabylon.de 2006-09-20 14:11 EST ------- I have no time to work myself in the review process. If someone would try it again he could take this spec. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 20 18:34:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2006 14:34:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187243] Review Request: lazarus : IDE and RAD tool for the free pascal compiler (fpc) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609201834.k8KIY34N027896@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lazarus : IDE and RAD tool for the free pascal compiler (fpc) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187243 ------- Additional Comments From joost at cnoc.nl 2006-09-20 14:34 EST ------- Excuses for my very late reply. But I missed the email and thought that no-one had looked at this package again.... (In reply to comment #14) > Why is the debuginfo package disabled? Actually, I don't know. Someone told me to do so, because an empty package was generated. I tried without that code, and that empty package isn't there anymore. So' I'll remove it. > Manual copying of the readme and license is not needed with the %doc macro in > the %files section which copies automatically. Merely specify %doc > lazarus/COPYING* etc. Fixed > You can drop the Requires: gdk-pixbuf, gtk+ and glibc, because rpm figures out > the library dependencies by itself. (rpm -q --requires to see them) Fixed In the meantime a new version is released, so I updated the version to 0.9.18. And it seems that rpmbuild doesn't strip the executables. The RPM is HUGE now. Where can I find more information about strip and rpmbuild? SRPM: http://www.cnoc.nl/fpc/lazarus-0.9.18-1.src.rpm SPEC: http://www.cnoc.nl/fpc/lazarus.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 20 18:39:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2006 14:39:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192311] Review Request: cobbler In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609201839.k8KIdrah028429@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cobbler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192311 ------- Additional Comments From mdehaan at redhat.com 2006-09-20 14:39 EST ------- Newness: Source code of released builds is now available in Mercurial: http://hg.et.redhat.com/hg/emd/applications/cobbler New home for files: http://et.redhat.com/~mdehaan/software/repo/ Accessible via yum: http://et.redhat.com/~mdehaan/software/mdehaan.repo All of this info is updated on the Wiki page: http://et.redhat.com/page/Cobbler_%26_Koan_Provisioning_Tools -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 20 18:40:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2006 14:40:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192313] Review Request: koan In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609201840.k8KIeHZI028461@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: koan https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192313 ------- Additional Comments From mdehaan at redhat.com 2006-09-20 14:40 EST ------- Newness: Source code of released builds is now available in Mercurial: http://hg.et.redhat.com/hg/emd/applications/koan New home for files: http://et.redhat.com/~mdehaan/software/repo/ Accessible via yum: http://et.redhat.com/~mdehaan/software/mdehaan.repo All of this info is updated on the Wiki page: http://et.redhat.com/page/Cobbler_%26_Koan_Provisioning_Tools -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 20 18:41:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2006 14:41:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192313] Review Request: koan In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609201841.k8KIfUV0028616@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: koan https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192313 ------- Additional Comments From mdehaan at redhat.com 2006-09-20 14:41 EST ------- In addition, the issues brought up by David L. above have been resolved. - %name macro removed - files section updated per packaging guidelines - COPYING file added -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 20 19:05:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2006 15:05:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192311] Review Request: cobbler In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609201905.k8KJ50cv030492@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cobbler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192311 ------- Additional Comments From mdehaan at redhat.com 2006-09-20 15:04 EST ------- John: ping on the above sponsorship request... %files has been fixed to Python packaging guidelines. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 20 19:10:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2006 15:10:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 175433] Review Request: tor - Anonymizing overlay network for TCP (The onion router) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609201910.k8KJAXc3030953@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tor - Anonymizing overlay network for TCP (The onion router) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175433 ------- Additional Comments From paul at xelerance.com 2006-09-20 15:10 EST ------- As for "requesting your will", not a single person but you is insisting on not having tor included without different init methods. I only see people who either want tor in and don't care, or people who are negative about the split. If we would be doing a concensus here, it would be to have a single tor package in FE now, and in the future when initng IS in FE to do the split. Furthermore, you expected initng to get here soonbut reality is, I still don't see it in the upcoming FC6 (as shown in 5.92). Are we going to wait having a tor package until FC7? It is you who does not want to depend on package that are considered 'always present', such as lvm2, thereby adding non fedora-extra issues to this package. Let's not drag the tsocks argument into this. One can trivially grab http://dag.wieers.com/packages/tsocks/ and put in in FE. I'll gladly either propose it or approve it if this tsocks issue is considered a tor blocker. The sub package issue is the only real issue here. It caused this package to not be approved on 2005-12-22 and 10 months later is still blocking it. That's why I think this should be discussed. This package either needs to get approved with the subpackage structure, or should be declined in favour of another packager. It should not remain in political limbo. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 20 19:40:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2006 15:40:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198830] Review Request: libmodelfile - library for accessing WorldForge model files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609201940.k8KJervG001982@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libmodelfile - library for accessing WorldForge model files Alias: libmodelfile https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198830 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-09-20 15:40 EST ------- By mail Wart wrote: "Hi Ralf, Hans, In the review for libmodelfile (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198830), you mention that the package's license conflicts with the included GPL license. The upstream author is willing to make the necessary changes, but has asked for clarification via bugzilla because he (nor I) are able to see exactly where the conflict arises. Ralf, you mention that section 2 of the source file licenses conflict with the GPL, but when I read section 2a of the GPL, I don't see this as a conflict. Could either of you follow up in the BZ report and clarify where exactly the conflict is, and what needs to be done to resolve it? Even though the package has already been FE_APPROVE'd, I'd rather not import it until this has been sorted out. Thanks! --Wart" I see your point, I guess they are compatible then Ralf, do you agree? Still it would be better /clearer / 100% sure if the copyright header could be changed to: /* Copyright (C) 2004 Alistair Riddoch * * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by * the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or * (at your option) any later version. * * Or (at your option) you can redistribute it and/or modify * it under the terms below instead of the terms of the GNU GPL: * * Permission is granted to anyone to use this software for any purpose, * including commercial applications, and to alter it and redistribute it * freely, subject to the following restrictions: * * 1. The origin of this software must not be misrepresented; you must not * claim that you wrote the original software. If you use this software * in a product, an acknowledgment in the product documentation would be * appreciated but is not required. * 2. Altered source versions must be plainly marked as such, and must not be * misrepresented as being the original software. * 3. This notice may not be removed or altered from any source distribution. Another alternative would be to remove the GPL text from the tarbal. The current problem isn't as much the copyright header / the license in the copyright header, as it is that the tarbal contains the GPL text in the COPYING file, but makes no other reference to the GPL, making the status of the software a bit unclear. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 20 20:36:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2006 16:36:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 175433] Review Request: tor - Anonymizing overlay network for TCP (The onion router) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609202036.k8KKaxf6007178@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tor - Anonymizing overlay network for TCP (The onion router) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175433 ------- Additional Comments From enrico.scholz at informatik.tu-chemnitz.de 2006-09-20 16:36 EST ------- Reviewers want the one-package structure but do not give a single argument why this should be done or why multiple packages are bad. I gave arguments why I chose the multi-package structure and nobody responded to these arguments so far. > initng ... I still don't see it in the upcoming FC6 initng is an Extras candidate and can be added after FC6 release > ... package that are considered 'always present', such as lvm2 ... ok; this might be a response to my arguments. But I do not think that this is a valid one. 'lvm2' is always present due to packaging bugs only (mixed initscripts and core-functionality; bloated 'initscripts' package). I can not fix the other packages because I would have to make this discussion at lot of other packages. RH developers are usually ignorant regarding dependency issues (e.g. look at aspell -> perl dep, sendmail -> cyrus-sasl, initscripts -> low-level stuff) so this would be a lost battle at least in Core. What I can do, is to package my packages properly and to separate core-functionality and unneeded/big dependencies which is giving users with e.g. chroots or non-SysV init a chance for a small system. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 20 20:45:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2006 16:45:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204343] Review Request: qcomicbook - a comic book viewing program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609202045.k8KKj70c007958@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qcomicbook - a comic book viewing program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204343 scott at perturb.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE Fixed In Version| |0.3.2-6 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 20 21:38:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2006 17:38:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188542] Review Request: hylafax In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609202138.k8KLckOa013222@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hylafax https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188542 ------- Additional Comments From s.adam at diffingo.com 2006-09-20 17:38 EST ------- Hello, I'm also not an official reviewer, but I ran rpmlint on the source RPM and it returned: E: hylafax configure-without-libdir-spec A configure script is run without specifying the libdir. configure options must be augmented with something like --libdir=%{_libdir}. I think you just need to add "--libdir=%{_libdir}" to your configure command. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 20 21:40:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2006 17:40:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199029] Review Request: jokosher In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609202140.k8KLe5JQ013435@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jokosher https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199029 ------- Additional Comments From jima at beer.tclug.org 2006-09-20 17:39 EST ------- Paul, not to be a stick-in-the-mud, but have you noticed this review blocks FE-NEEDSPONSOR? Although I suppose Toshio *is* a sponsor... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 20 21:41:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2006 17:41:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199405] Review Request: vtk - The Visualization Toolkit - A high level 3D visualization library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609202141.k8KLfKrG013520@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vtk - The Visualization Toolkit - A high level 3D visualization library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199405 ------- Additional Comments From Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net 2006-09-20 17:41 EST ------- Packages update to 5.0.2 are at http://people.atrpms.net/~athimm/fedorasubmit/vtk/vtk.spec http://people.atrpms.net/~athimm/fedorasubmit/vtk/vtk-5.0.2-13.at.src.rpm Wrt patents: There are some patented algorithms were the patents are held by the authors. What is the proper procedure? If the authors would be willing to allow a free distribution through fedora would that be OK? If yes, I would ask them to. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 20 21:45:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2006 17:45:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188542] Review Request: hylafax In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609202145.k8KLjeeE013746@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hylafax https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188542 ------- Additional Comments From faxguy at howardsilvan.com 2006-09-20 17:45 EST ------- HylaFAX's configure script isn't generated by autotools and does not have a --libdir=%{_libdir} option. I'm quite confident that the configure call is correct as it is already in the spec file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 20 21:53:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2006 17:53:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188542] Review Request: hylafax In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609202153.k8KLrm5S014249@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hylafax https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188542 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at christoph-wickert.de 2006-09-20 17:53 EST ------- Hi Howard, nice to see you are still around. Are you willing to maintain Hylafax with me, if co-maintainership works? I have to admit that I forgot this package, I had a lot of work with my xfce-plugins for 4.4. I'm going to do a complete review this week, I promise. After that Thorsten will sponsor you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 20 22:02:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2006 18:02:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188542] Review Request: hylafax In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609202202.k8KM20gQ015002@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hylafax https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188542 ------- Additional Comments From faxguy at howardsilvan.com 2006-09-20 18:01 EST ------- Yes, I am willing to maintain HylaFAX with you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 20 22:56:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2006 18:56:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206693] Review Request: KTechlab - Development and simulation of microcontrollers and electronic circuits In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609202256.k8KMu0at018596@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: KTechlab - Development and simulation of microcontrollers and electronic circuits https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206693 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2006-09-20 18:55 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > Well, I will review this package. > Thanks, Mamoru > 1. From http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines : > > * Requires > - Explain why this package requires gputils, gpsim. > gpsim, for pic simulation: PIC microcontrollors are fully simulated in the circuit, via integration with gpsim. All PICs supported by gpsim are capable of being run and debugged in KTechlab, but only bidirectional and open PIC pins are simulated properly. gputils for assembly: KTechlab provides integration with gputils for quick assembly and testing of progams. Errors in the assembly output can be clicked on to go straight to the problem code. > * BuildRequires > - libtool, autoconf is not necessary, perhaps. > > * File and Directory Ownership > - The following directries are not owned. > /usr/share/config.kcfg/ > This is owned by kdebase, hence I should add it as Requires ls /usr/share/config.kcfg/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 20 23:05:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2006 19:05:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206693] Review Request: KTechlab - Development and simulation of microcontrollers and electronic circuits In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609202305.k8KN5g9f018976@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: KTechlab - Development and simulation of microcontrollers and electronic circuits https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206693 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2006-09-20 19:05 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > 2. The tarball is mal-packaged. > It ships an autom4te.cache/. > > I'd suggest to rm -rf autom4te.cache in %prep. I can't see it. rpm -ql ktechlab | grep cache /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/ktechlab/index.cache.bz2 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 20 23:10:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2006 19:10:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190997] Review Request: linux-wlan-ng In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609202310.k8KNAVYa019217@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: linux-wlan-ng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190997 ------- Additional Comments From redhat at flyn.org 2006-09-20 19:10 EST ------- New version: http://flyn.org/SRPMS/linux-wlan-ng-kmod-0.2.5-1.2.6.17_1.2647.fc6.src.rpm http://flyn.org/SRPMS/linux-wlan-ng.spec http://flyn.org/SRPMS/linux-wlan-ng-tools-0.2.5-1.src.rpm http://flyn.org/SRPMS/linux-wlan-ng-tools.spec Does the kmodtool tool now bring in a dependency on -common? These packages now require this. Should I rename linux-wlan-ng-tools to linux-wlan-ng-common? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 21 00:40:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2006 20:40:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206693] Review Request: KTechlab - Development and simulation of microcontrollers and electronic circuits In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609210040.k8L0eT6j024278@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: KTechlab - Development and simulation of microcontrollers and electronic circuits https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206693 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2006-09-20 20:40 EST ------- (In reply to comment #8) > (In reply to comment #2) > > > 2. The tarball is mal-packaged. > > It ships an autom4te.cache/. # tar tjvf ktechlab-0.3.tar.bz2 | grep autom4 drwxr-xr-x david/david 0 2006-01-05 11:55 ktechlab-0.3/autom4te.cache/ -rw-r--r-- david/david 5185 2006-01-05 11:55 ktechlab-0.3/autom4te.cache/requests -rw-r--r-- david/david 1035902 2006-01-05 11:55 ktechlab-0.3/autom4te.cache/output.0 -rw-r--r-- david/david 200071 2006-01-05 11:55 ktechlab-0.3/autom4te.cache/traces.0 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 21 00:44:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2006 20:44:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206693] Review Request: KTechlab - Development and simulation of microcontrollers and electronic circuits In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609210044.k8L0i8ep024393@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: KTechlab - Development and simulation of microcontrollers and electronic circuits https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206693 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2006-09-20 20:44 EST ------- (In reply to comment #7) > (In reply to comment #3) > > - Explain why this package requires gputils, gpsim. > > > gpsim, for pic simulation: > gputils for assembly: Show us any spot inside of the code which invokes any tool from these packages. ktechlab is linked against libraries from these packages, but I don't see it invoking any executable from these packages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 21 01:15:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2006 21:15:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198830] Review Request: libmodelfile - library for accessing WorldForge model files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609210115.k8L1FDmX025585@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libmodelfile - library for accessing WorldForge model files Alias: libmodelfile https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198830 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2006-09-20 21:15 EST ------- (In reply to comment #8) > In the review for libmodelfile > (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198830), you > mention that the package's license conflicts with the included GPL license. > > The upstream author is willing to make the necessary changes, but has > asked for clarification via bugzilla because he (nor I) are able to see > exactly where the conflict arises. Ralf, you mention that section 2 of > the source file licenses conflict with the GPL, but when I read section > 2a of the GPL, I don't see this as a conflict. > > I see your point, I guess they are compatible then Ralf, do you agree? Well, the author's sources apply a license which is not the GPL. He licenses them under a different license model => His sources are not GPL'ed. Judging if his work can be shipped under a "GPL umbrella" probably would require a lawyer. As I originally said, I see a potential incompatibility between the GPL and paragraph 2 of his license: "2. Altered source versions must be plainly marked as such, and must not be misrepresented as being the original software." -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 21 01:25:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2006 21:25:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207077] Review Request: classpath-0.92 - Essential Libraries for Java In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609210125.k8L1PLD8026077@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: classpath-0.92 - Essential Libraries for Java https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207077 ------- Additional Comments From fnasser at redhat.com 2006-09-20 21:25 EST ------- I have a limewire-3.5.6-3jpp RPM that I could try and upgrade to 4.12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 21 01:29:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2006 21:29:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198830] Review Request: libmodelfile - library for accessing WorldForge model files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609210129.k8L1T4aD026273@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libmodelfile - library for accessing WorldForge model files Alias: libmodelfile https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198830 ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2006-09-20 21:29 EST ------- Ok, so here's what I'm going to do: Since both the GPL and the other license text are both fedora-acceptable, I'm going to list the License in the spec file as "Distributable" for now. Once a new set of sources are released that contain a single licensing text, then I'll change the License tag appropriately. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 21 02:40:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2006 22:40:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206839] Review Request: TurboKid - Python template plugin that supports Kid templates In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609210240.k8L2egOw030917@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: TurboKid - Python template plugin that supports Kid templates https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206839 toshio at tiki-lounge.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |toshio at tiki-lounge.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 21 04:14:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 00:14:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206398] Review Request: php-pecl-Fileinfo - libmagic bindings In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609210414.k8L4ElQr005878@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pecl-Fileinfo - libmagic bindings https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206398 fedora at theholbrooks.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From fedora at theholbrooks.org 2006-09-21 00:14 EST ------- Imported and Built -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 21 05:53:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 01:53:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198830] Review Request: libmodelfile - library for accessing WorldForge model files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609210553.k8L5rcvR010964@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libmodelfile - library for accessing WorldForge model files Alias: libmodelfile https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198830 wart at kobold.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2006-09-21 01:53 EST ------- Imported and built. Thanks for the review! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 21 05:53:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 01:53:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198839] Review Request: sear - WorldForge client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609210553.k8L5rfVQ010980@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sear - WorldForge client Alias: sear https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198839 Bug 198839 depends on bug 198830, which changed state. Bug 198830 Summary: Review Request: libmodelfile - library for accessing WorldForge model files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198830 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 21 06:21:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 02:21:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 173459] Review Request: initng In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609210621.k8L6LkP2012182@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 ------- Additional Comments From enrico.scholz at informatik.tu-chemnitz.de 2006-09-21 02:21 EST ------- I would prefer when the | Requires: policycoreutils would be in an own subpackage. 'policycoreutils' is badly packed (brings in 'initscripts', 'python' and 'pyxf86config' dependencies) and would bloat up 'initng'. Having the SElinux %script in an own subpackage with | %package selinux | Requires(pre): initng = %name-%version would allow people without SELinux to keep a small system. Alternatively, core stuff (content of the current main package) could be moved into a '-core' subpackage which is an 'Requires(pre):' of the main-page. The main-page would require and execute the heavy-weighted SELinux stuff only. This alternative has the advantage that 'yum install initng' would do the thing which is correct for 90% of users while special environments (e.g. chroots) can install the -core package with reduced dependencies. 'policycoreutils' are not required by much packages and it would be not good when 'initng' would bring it in. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 21 06:38:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 02:38:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 173459] Review Request: initng In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609210638.k8L6ct5M013037@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 ------- Additional Comments From enrico.scholz at informatik.tu-chemnitz.de 2006-09-21 02:38 EST ------- while I think about it... SELinux scripts and requirements should be removed completely. FC5 policy contains already | /sbin/init(ng)? -- system_u:object_r:init_exec_t:s0 so that initng will be labeled correctly by 'rpm' itself. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 21 08:07:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 04:07:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188542] Review Request: hylafax In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609210807.k8L87Gxt019968@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hylafax https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188542 ------- Additional Comments From bugs.michael at gmx.net 2006-09-21 04:07 EST ------- The %changelog is very out-of-date. > %define faxspool %{_var}/spool/hylafax Since /var is hardcoded pretty much everywhere, e.g. in the initscript, using %{_var} here doesn't add any safety. Just use /var unless it were possible to propagate the value of %{_var} into all relevant files. > %install > [ "$RPM_BUILD_ROOT" != "/" ] && rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT > %clean > [ "$RPM_BUILD_ROOT" != "/" ] && rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT Both checks are not needed by default and are not reliable. Simply "rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT" has been used in thousands of packages for many many years. > %makeinstall -e \ If %configure is not used, using %makeinstall makes no sense either. Prefer "make install ..." just like it's correct for most other packages. >>> # Starting from 4.1.6, port/install.sh won't chown/chmod anymore if the current # user is not root; instead a file root.sh is created with chown/chmod inside. # # If you build the rpm as normal user (not root) you get an rpm with all the # permissions messed up and hylafax will give various weird errors. # # The following line fixes that. # [ -f root.sh ] && sh root.sh <<< If this is true, there are packaging errors left somewhere. This comment in the spec file doesn't sound right at least. The rpm must build as normal user and must not rely on chown/chmod. Make sure the %attr(...) settings are complete for any files that really need them and without depending on any execution of chown/chmod. *If*, however, (and I believe you do) you only intended to justify why "root.sh" must be executed when installing Hylafax from tarball as non-root user, the comment is just misleading/confusing. > $ rpm -qlvp hylafax-debuginfo-4.3.0.3-1.i386.rpm > (contains no files) This is because in root.sh (and maybe elsewhere, too) the executables are stripped, which should not be done, and which makes the debuginfo package useless. > drwxr-xr-x uucp uucp 0 /var/spool/hylafax/bin > -rw-r--r-- uucp uucp 14072 /var/spool/hylafax/etc/lutRS18.pcf Wouldn't root:root ownership suffice? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 21 09:19:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 05:19:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202946] Review Request: aqsis - 3D Rendering system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609210919.k8L9JogP025530@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aqsis - 3D Rendering system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202946 ------- Additional Comments From denis at poolshark.org 2006-09-21 05:19 EST ------- Okay, let's go with 1) for now, to finish this review. I'd like aqsis to make it into FE when FC6 comes out, so that we have the k3d/aqsis pair available. Let me know if there are still things you want me change. After the package approval, I'll start working on a new version based on a CVS snapshot. Ubuntu uses a snapshot from 2005/08/15 (a year old!). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 21 09:49:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 05:49:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192313] Review Request: koan In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609210949.k8L9nVrI028535@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: koan https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192313 ------- Additional Comments From dlutter at redhat.com 2006-09-21 05:49 EST ------- Looks good; some more comments which won't hold up the review: - Include COPYING (and README. maybe AUTHORS) in the rpm with '%doc COPYING README' - The description has a small type (s/Koan standards/Koan stands/) - Remove the INSTALLED_FILES business from %install, since it's not used anymore I'll approve this as soon as you've been sponsored. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 21 10:32:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 06:32:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 175433] Review Request: tor - Anonymizing overlay network for TCP (The onion router) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609211032.k8LAWAgv031849@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tor - Anonymizing overlay network for TCP (The onion router) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175433 ------- Additional Comments From denis at poolshark.org 2006-09-21 06:31 EST ------- > Reviewers want the one-package structure but do not give a single > argument why this should be done or why multiple packages are bad. Sure, let's give it a shot. - We've never had a policy for systematically splitting packages strictly based on a couple of fairly common packages. The policy is mostly based on common-sense, i.e. when the subpackage has a real dependency bloat issue such as bringing in the entire java stack, or gstreamer, or 25 perl packages. - If we were to use your strict splitting policy on all Fedora packages, the total number of packages in Fedora would be multiplied by 3 or 4. There's an inherent cost associated with increasing the number of packages at the yum/rpm level. Yum is improving all the time but it has enough work to do as it is. - Simplicity. Keep It Simple. I'm looking at the tor tarball, and it's dreadfully simple. No complicated dependencies, very small number of installed files. Not even 2M in size. So the complexity you're introducing in the spec file doesn't match the complexity of the upstream project. - Consistency to me is an important issue. Consistency across Fedora for one. To use more or less similar guidelines for packages split. Consistency across other distributions for second. - Your refusal to collaborate with reviewers is hurting Fedora. You're essentially blackballing a number of useful packages from entering Fedora, since you're holding a temporary monopoly on those particular package reviews. - Enrico, nobody is doubting your technical expertise, but I just think your reasoning doesn't fall within the scope of what Fedora is. Fedora is not a distro targetted at the embedded world, and mock seems to work pretty well is it now, so I don't understand the quest for the smallest system possible. The SysV init is the default and only init system available right now, so isolating that dependency right now doesn't make sense. Especially since we'll end up with a subpackage containing a single 1.8 Kbytes shell script. The fact that the entire community doens't support your splitting proposal, and the fact that no other distros does it should *at least* give you a hint that something is wrong with your reasoning. You can't be serious if you think you're right and everyone else is wrong. So please, either - fold the package into one, so I can review it and let's get this over with - close this bug and withdraw your review to give someone else the opportunity to submit it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 21 10:56:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 06:56:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207472] New: Review Request: ruby-activesupport - Utility classes and extension to Ruby's standard library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207472 Summary: Review Request: ruby-activesupport - Utility classes and extension to Ruby's standard library Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: dlutter at redhat.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/dlutter/yum/spec/ruby-activesupport.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/dlutter/yum/SRPMS/ruby-activesupport-1.3.1-1.src.rpm Description: Utility classes and extension to the standard library that were required by Rails, but found of general use. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 21 11:00:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 07:00:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207472] Review Request: ruby-activesupport - Utility classes and extension to Ruby's standard library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609211100.k8LB00li001661@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-activesupport - Utility classes and extension to Ruby's standard library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207472 ------- Additional Comments From dlutter at redhat.com 2006-09-21 06:59 EST ------- Output from rpmlint: E: ruby-activesupport non-executable-script /usr/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/active_support/vendor/builder/xmlbase.rb 0644 E: ruby-activesupport non-executable-script /usr/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/active_support/vendor/builder/blankslate.rb 0644 E: ruby-activesupport non-executable-script /usr/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/active_support/vendor/builder/xmlmarkup.rb 0644 E: ruby-activesupport non-executable-script /usr/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/active_support/vendor/builder/xmlevents.rb 0644 E: ruby-activesupport non-executable-script /usr/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/active_support/vendor/builder.rb 0644 While these files all start with #!/usr/bin/ruby, they are mainly used as a library, and included by the toplevel active_support.rb, so I think this warning should be ignored -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 21 11:01:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 07:01:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207473] New: Review Request: ruby-activerecord - Implements the ActiveRecord pattern for ORM Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207473 Summary: Review Request: ruby-activerecord - Implements the ActiveRecord pattern for ORM Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: dlutter at redhat.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/dlutter/yum/spec/ruby-activerecord.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/dlutter/yum/SRPMS/ruby-activerecord-1.14.2-1.src.rpm Description: Implements the ActiveRecord pattern (Fowler, PoEAA) for ORM. It ties database tables and classes together for business objects, like Customer or Subscription, that can find, save, and destroy themselves without resorting to manual SQL. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 21 11:04:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 07:04:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207472] Review Request: ruby-activesupport - Utility classes and extension to Ruby's standard library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609211104.k8LB49hw002028@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-activesupport - Utility classes and extension to Ruby's standard library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207472 dlutter at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |207473 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 21 11:04:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 07:04:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207473] Review Request: ruby-activerecord - Implements the ActiveRecord pattern for ORM In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609211104.k8LB4825002023@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-activerecord - Implements the ActiveRecord pattern for ORM https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207473 dlutter at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |207472 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From dlutter at redhat.com 2006-09-21 07:04 EST ------- rpmlint says: E: ruby-activerecord script-without-shellbang /usr/share/doc/ruby-activerecord-1.14.2/README because it gets confused by the first line of the README. Should b ignorable. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 21 11:11:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 07:11:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 175433] Review Request: tor - Anonymizing overlay network for TCP (The onion router) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609211111.k8LBBgJ3002598@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tor - Anonymizing overlay network for TCP (The onion router) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175433 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-09-21 07:11 EST ------- (In reply to comment #46) > - Enrico, nobody is doubting your technical expertise, but I just think your > reasoning doesn't fall within the scope of what Fedora is. Fedora is not a > distro targetted at the embedded world, and mock seems to work pretty well is it > now, so I don't understand the quest for the smallest system possible. Given that Fedora is heavily involved in the OLPC project, I suspect that bloated dependency chains are likely to become more of an issue and get more attention in the FC7 timeframe. Enrico is a little "ahead of the game" here but I can see the approach of splitting packages up to fine-tune dependencies becoming more common in the near future. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 21 11:16:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 07:16:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206478] Review Request: Yumdiff - Compares RPMS installed on local and remote systems In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609211116.k8LBG8p7002878@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Yumdiff - Compares RPMS installed on local and remote systems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206478 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2006-09-21 07:15 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > Jon, are you actively working on improving yumdiff? > > I am having serious doubts if this script in its current shape is ready for > inclusion in FE. I've frozen any changes while working on the submission process. What changes or improvements do you suggest? I'm open to any suggestions. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 21 12:25:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 08:25:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 175433] Review Request: tor - Anonymizing overlay network for TCP (The onion router) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609211225.k8LCPK2a007970@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tor - Anonymizing overlay network for TCP (The onion router) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175433 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-09-21 08:24 EST ------- (In reply to comment #46) > - Your refusal to collaborate with reviewers is hurting Fedora. You're > essentially blackballing a number of useful packages from entering Fedora, since > you're holding a temporary monopoly on those particular package reviews. That's the rule of the game. Maybe it could be changed, but I don't think this example call for that change. It is not a refusal to cooperate, but a disagreement. I haven't looked deeply at this, but I tend to think that both approaches are valid (split and unsplit) each with pros and cons. The dependencies are better isolated with Enrico approach while it is simpler and more generic unsplit. > The fact that the entire community doens't support your splitting proposal, and > the fact that no other distros does it should *at least* give you a hint that > something is wrong with your reasoning. You can't be serious if you think you're > right and everyone else is wrong. That's a wrong assumption. The number isn't a proof of correctness. Especially when the people having looked at the issue is only a subset of the community. And given the rules, Enrico needs only to find one reviewer who backs up his view. Anybody disagreeing might then throw the issue on the extras list, but currently 2 people may be against all the other packagers (not that I consider that to be a healthy situation). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 21 12:34:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 08:34:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 184530] Review Request: perl-RPM2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609211234.k8LCYSFv008480@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-RPM2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=184530 jpo at di.uminho.pt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|jpo at di.uminho.pt |fedora-perl-devel- | |list at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From jpo at di.uminho.pt 2006-09-21 08:34 EST ------- CC += fedora-perl-devel-list at redhat.com * I believe Jason is no longer around; maybe Robin Norwood could take over this and try to contact the Red Hat Legal Department * The core perl-RPM-Specfile package has the same problem: - same author (Chip Turner) - same initial packager (Chip Turner) - it doesn't contain any copyright information (http://search.cpan.org/dist/RPM-Specfile/) - the specfile states the license is "GPL or Artistic" $ rpm -qp --qf="%{license}\n" perl-RPM-Specfile-1.19-2.1.1.src.rpm GPL or Artistic * The upstream RPM package started including the perl RPM[2] module as of 4.4.3. It now generates a rpm-perl subpackage (http://wraptastic.org/pub/rpm-4.4.x/) $ rpm -qpl rpm-perl-4.4.3-1.i386.rpm /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.7/i386-linux-thread-multi/RPM2.pm /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.7/i386-linux-thread-multi/auto/RPM2 /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.7/i386-linux-thread-multi/auto/RPM2/RPM2.so /usr/share/man/man3/RPM2.3pm.gz $ rpm -qpl rpm-perl-4.4.6-1.i386.rpm /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.8/i386-linux-thread-multi/RPM.pm /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.8/i386-linux-thread-multi/auto/RPM /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.8/i386-linux-thread-multi/auto/RPM/RPM.so /usr/share/man/man3/RPM.3pm.gz Note: the rpm maintainer has renamed the perl module (RPM2 -> RPM) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 21 12:41:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 08:41:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206693] Review Request: KTechlab - Development and simulation of microcontrollers and electronic circuits In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609211241.k8LCfhL9008903@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: KTechlab - Development and simulation of microcontrollers and electronic circuits https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206693 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-09-21 08:41 EST ------- Well, (In reply to comment #7) > This is owned by kdebase, hence I should add it as Requires Is kdebase required only for the dependency for /usr/share/config.kcfg/ ? Actually I don't use KDE and currently I don't have kdelibs installed. However, this package seems to work well (at least by checking: ktechlab examples.circuit and examples.circuit is from http://ktechlab.org/screenshots/ ). So, if it is only for the ownership problem that kdelibs should be required, I think that /usr/share/config.kcfg/ should be owned by ktechlab, too and kdebase should not be required. And.. > gputils for assembly: > KTechlab provides integration with gputils for quick assembly and testing of > progams. Well, this means that it is _useful_ that KTechlab is installed together with gputils, however, this does not mean that KTechlab is completely unusable without gputils? For me, executing "ktechlab examples.circuit" seems to work without gputils . Well, I cannot judge correctly if this is working as you desired, however, at least ktechlab seems to launch normally and read circult correctly. IMO, the explicit dependency for gputils, gpsim can be removed. Also, check for BuildRequires and something else. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 21 13:44:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 09:44:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206985] Review Request: perl-Device-SerialPort In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609211344.k8LDiWgR014960@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Device-SerialPort https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206985 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-09-21 09:44 EST ------- Hmm, that didn't seem to work. Ah, the URL immediately above is wrong; s/1.002-1/1.002-2/ and it's OK. Everything looks good now. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 21 13:50:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 09:50:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206478] Review Request: Yumdiff - Compares RPMS installed on local and remote systems In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609211350.k8LDoO5K015431@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Yumdiff - Compares RPMS installed on local and remote systems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206478 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2006-09-21 09:50 EST ------- (In reply to comment #6) > (In reply to comment #5) > I've frozen any changes while working on the submission process. What changes > or improvements do you suggest? I'm open to any suggestions. What your script basically does at the moment, is fetching /var/log/rpmpkgs via ssh from a remote host and diff it against the local one. 1. This working principle can't work. 2. Your script produces bogus results (probably bugs) 3. Your script relies on many preliminaries on the remote host 4. ... All in all, I feel your script to be in a very early stage. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 21 13:57:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 09:57:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206478] Review Request: Yumdiff - Compares RPMS installed on local and remote systems In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609211357.k8LDvQch015823@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Yumdiff - Compares RPMS installed on local and remote systems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206478 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2006-09-21 09:57 EST ------- (In reply to comment #7) > (In reply to comment #6) > > What your script basically does at the moment, is fetching > /var/log/rpmpkgs via ssh from a remote host and diff it against the local one. > > 1. This working principle can't work. > 2. Your script produces bogus results (probably bugs) > 3. Your script relies on many preliminaries on the remote host > 4. ... > > All in all, I feel your script to be in a very early stage. I'm considering changing it to call rpm -qa and sort the results directly, rather that relying on the /etc/cron.daily/rpm having run, which would likely address #2. As for #3, I felt if same to assume that most networked Fedora hosts would have ssh running and rpm installed. Could you elaborate on #1? I'm not sure I follow what you mean. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 21 14:08:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 10:08:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192313] Review Request: koan In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609211408.k8LE8DTc016903@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: koan https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192313 ------- Additional Comments From mdehaan at redhat.com 2006-09-21 10:08 EST ------- Thanks: - %doc section fixed - typo fixed - INSTALLED_FILES fixed I've made the same fixes to cobbler. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 21 14:42:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 10:42:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207532] New: Review Request: kbackup - Back up your data in a simple, user friendly way Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207532 Summary: Review Request: kbackup - Back up your data in a simple, user friendly way Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: aportal at univ-montp2.fr QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://linuxelectronique.free.fr/download/fedora/5/SPECS/kbackup.spec SRPM URL: http://linuxelectronique.free.fr/download/fedora/5/SRPMS/kbackup-0.4.2-2.src.rpm Description: KBackup is a program that lets you back up any directories or files, whereby it uses an easy to use directory tree to select the things to back up. The program was designed to be very simple in its use so that it can be used by non-computer experts. The storage format is the well known TAR format, whereby the data is still stored in compressed format (bzip2 or gzip). %changelog * Thu Sep 21 2006 Alain Portal 0.4.2-2 - Add patch to fix some typo in fr.po - Add patch to frenchify x-kbp.desktop * Wed Sep 20 2006 Alain Portal 0.4.2-1 - Initial Fedora RPM - Add patch to frenchify kbackup.desktop -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 21 15:06:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 11:06:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 175433] Review Request: tor - Anonymizing overlay network for TCP (The onion router) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609211506.k8LF6JY3024015@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tor - Anonymizing overlay network for TCP (The onion router) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175433 ------- Additional Comments From paul at xelerance.com 2006-09-21 11:06 EST ------- > Reviewers want the one-package structure but do not give a single argument why > this should be done or why multiple packages are bad. No, you are refusing to hear them. 1) most, if not all other packages work like that. When people introduce initng, if it will happen at all in the future, then that's a good time to redo this package along with the hundreds of other packages 2) you are insisting on custom non-FE requirements 3) your requires are custom and don't take into account the regular FE base install (that includes lvm2 etc, you call bloat) 4) spec file is overly complex (and a reason people are not approving it) 5) You are blowing up a simple package into many subpackages which is completely unneccessary on a FC/FE machine (versus your development box where you need it) I guess the FE new package submission needs a way to DISapprove a package so these deadlocks do not occur. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 21 15:17:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 11:17:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 175433] Review Request: tor - Anonymizing overlay network for TCP (The onion router) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609211517.k8LFHDmt025097@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tor - Anonymizing overlay network for TCP (The onion router) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175433 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-09-21 11:16 EST ------- Re: comment 46 , Dennis said: > So please, either > - fold the package into one, so I can review it and let's get this over with > - close this bug and withdraw your review to give someone else the opportunity > to submit it. Also consider the possibility that you (both) can agree to disagree, and remove yourself as reviewer, and let someone else do it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 21 15:22:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 11:22:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 195683] Review Request: smarteiffel - The GNU Eiffel Compiler and Libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609211522.k8LFMR61025672@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: smarteiffel - The GNU Eiffel Compiler and Libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195683 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |tibbs at math.uh.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 21 15:58:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 11:58:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207473] Review Request: ruby-activerecord - Implements the ActiveRecord pattern for ORM In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609211558.k8LFwLDb029530@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-activerecord - Implements the ActiveRecord pattern for ORM https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207473 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2006-09-21 11:58 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > rpmlint says: > E: ruby-activerecord script-without-shellbang > /usr/share/doc/ruby-activerecord-1.14.2/README > > because it gets confused by the first line of the README. No it doesen't, README is installed executable... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 21 16:51:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 12:51:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207532] Review Request: kbackup - Back up your data in a simple, user friendly way In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609211651.k8LGpMIc003016@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kbackup - Back up your data in a simple, user friendly way https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207532 ml at deadbabylon.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ml at deadbabylon.de ------- Additional Comments From ml at deadbabylon.de 2006-09-21 12:51 EST ------- (I'm no official reviewer so the comment is just a proposal) - Use "%configure --disable-rpath" instead of "./configure --disable-rpath" - Not sure about "%{__rm} -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT". PackagingGuidelines and ReviewGuidelines are using simple "rm -rf %{buildroot}" - Not sure about french description. In ReviewGuidelines it is a must, that the spec is in American English. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 21 17:13:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 13:13:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207532] Review Request: kbackup - Back up your data in a simple, user friendly way In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609211713.k8LHDw6U005088@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kbackup - Back up your data in a simple, user friendly way https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207532 aportal at univ-montp2.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |alain.portal at free.fr ------- Additional Comments From aportal at univ-montp2.fr 2006-09-21 13:13 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > (I'm no official reviewer so the comment is just a proposal) > > - Use "%configure --disable-rpath" instead of "./configure --disable-rpath" Oups... Fixed > - Not sure about "%{__rm} -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT". PackagingGuidelines and > ReviewGuidelines are using simple "rm -rf %{buildroot}" When a macro is available for a command, I prefer use it. > - Not sure about french description. In ReviewGuidelines it is a must, that the > spec is in American English. I don't remember where I saw it, but other language description and summary was a SHOULD Spec URL: http://linuxelectronique.free.fr/download/fedora/5/SPECS/kbackup.spec SRPM URL: http://linuxelectronique.free.fr/download/fedora/5/SRPMS/kbackup-0.4.2-3.src.rpm %changelog * Thu Sep 21 2006 Alain Portal 0.4.2-3 - Use macro for configure instead of hardcoding path - Use macro style instead of variable style -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 21 17:22:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 13:22:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207532] Review Request: kbackup - Back up your data in a simple, user friendly way In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609211722.k8LHM10g006024@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kbackup - Back up your data in a simple, user friendly way https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207532 ------- Additional Comments From ml at deadbabylon.de 2006-09-21 13:21 EST ------- > I don't remember where I saw it, but other > language description and summary was a SHOULD My fault, you're right. Please ignore this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 21 17:26:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 13:26:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187433] Review Request: acx-kmod - Open ACX100/ACX111 wireless NIC driver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609211726.k8LHQZEL006452@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: acx-kmod - Open ACX100/ACX111 wireless NIC driver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187433 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|fedora-extras- |fedora-package- |list at redhat.com |review at redhat.com rpm at greysector.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |nobody at fedoraproject.org ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2006-09-21 13:26 EST ------- The PCMCIA port on my laptop has died, I have no means to test this anymore, so I'm withdrawing this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 21 17:30:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 13:30:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188542] Review Request: hylafax In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609211730.k8LHUu8r006981@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hylafax https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188542 ------- Additional Comments From faxguy at howardsilvan.com 2006-09-21 13:30 EST ------- I've updated the spec file and the SRPM. Please see: http://osdn.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/hylafax/hylafax.spec http://osdn.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/hylafax/hylafax-4.3.0.11-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 21 17:31:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 13:31:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187508] Review Request: acx-kmod-common - ACX100/ACX111 driver common files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609211731.k8LHVAL7007021@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: acx-kmod-common - ACX100/ACX111 driver common files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187508 rpm at greysector.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |nobody at fedoraproject.org ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2006-09-21 13:31 EST ------- The PCMCIA port on my laptop has died, I have no means to test this anymore, so I'm withdrawing this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 21 17:38:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 13:38:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177583] Review Request: zaptel-kmod In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609211738.k8LHcCJN007802@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: zaptel-kmod https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177583 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-09-21 13:38 EST ------- While there isn't yet a hard rule against modules that don't plan upstream inclusion, there are a number of folks in FESCo that don't want to approve modules that don't plan upstream inclusion. Any word from Digium if they might change their minds on that point? (I will send an email to Kevin Fleming about this point) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 21 17:39:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 13:39:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205885] Review Request: perl-CGI-Untaint-email - Validate an email address In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609211739.k8LHdvQ6008107@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-CGI-Untaint-email - Validate an email address https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205885 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2006-09-21 13:39 EST ------- Built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 21 17:40:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 13:40:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205886] Review Request: perl-File-MMagic-XS - Guess file type with XS In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609211740.k8LHeNcj008155@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-File-MMagic-XS - Guess file type with XS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205886 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2006-09-21 13:40 EST ------- Built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 21 17:44:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 13:44:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206985] Review Request: perl-Device-SerialPort In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609211744.k8LHif2Z008637@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Device-SerialPort https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206985 orion at cora.nwra.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From orion at cora.nwra.com 2006-09-21 13:44 EST ------- Checked in and built and added to owners.list. Thanks for the review! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 21 18:12:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 14:12:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 175433] Review Request: tor - Anonymizing overlay network for TCP (The onion router) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609211812.k8LICUqu011319@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tor - Anonymizing overlay network for TCP (The onion router) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175433 ------- Additional Comments From enrico.scholz at informatik.tu-chemnitz.de 2006-09-21 14:12 EST ------- > - We've never had a policy for systematically splitting packages Exactly, there is no policy which says when to split a package. Until then, it is packager's choice whether he splits or does not split. My choice is, to split. > - If we were to use your strict splitting policy on all Fedora packages, > the total number of packages in Fedora would be multiplied by 3 or > 4. There's an inherent cost associated with increasing the number of > packages at the yum/rpm level. Is this cost measured in KB, seconds, used lines on display or bananas? Wouldn't they be outweighted by lesser dependencies and a smaller system? E.g. monolithic 'tor' might bring in initscripts, lvm2, udev... while a splitted tor brings only tor-core. Splitting seems to reduce inherent costs on yum/rpm level for me... Splitting will perhaps increase needed blocksize (1-4K) in the repository by one or two. The Used diskspace on the repository is cheap. Much cheaper than the bloat introduced by unneeded dependencies. > - Simplicity. Keep It Simple. Ok, I can remove the initscript stuff completely and provide single 'tor-lsb' and 'tor-initng' packages. Would just add two more reviews and people would complain that 'tor' main package does not have an initscript. As a compromise: I will keep -lsb in main package (as is) and remove only the -minit and -initng part. Would you accept this? > - Consistency to me is an important issue. What would bring you consistency here? Using 'yum install tor' installs consistently a 'tor' daemon with the appropriate initscripts; both with the splitted and bloated variant. > Consistency across other distributions for second. Package is for Fedora Extras; I do not request a review for Debian or Mandriva. > Not even 2M in size. Size of package does not matter for dependencies issues. A 20 byte perl script can bring in 50 MB of perl. > - Your refusal to collaborate with reviewers is hurting Fedora. Come on. Your refusal to accept views of packagers is hurting Fedora. ========= > 1) most, if not all other packages work like that. In Germany we have a proverb: "millions of flies can not err: shit tastes great". When you are new it might be good idea to follow the masses. But at some time you should turn on the brain and think yourself. > 2) you are insisting on custom non-FE requirements Ok, as written above, I will remove the -initng and -minit subpackage when this helps. I really do not want to continue this meta-discussion which consists only of personal views and unproved statements like "entire community". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 21 18:20:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 14:20:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 175433] Review Request: tor - Anonymizing overlay network for TCP (The onion router) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609211820.k8LIKJ9q012098@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tor - Anonymizing overlay network for TCP (The onion router) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175433 toshio at tiki-lounge.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|denis at poolshark.org |toshio at tiki-lounge.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 21 18:39:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 14:39:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 175433] Review Request: tor - Anonymizing overlay network for TCP (The onion router) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609211839.k8LIdmS9014141@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tor - Anonymizing overlay network for TCP (The onion router) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175433 ------- Additional Comments From enrico.scholz at informatik.tu-chemnitz.de 2006-09-21 14:38 EST ------- Ok, you won: * Do Sep 21 2006 Enrico Scholz - 0.1.1.23-0.1 - simplified spec file and removed -initng and -minit stuff http://ensc.de/fedora/tor/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 21 18:45:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 14:45:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 175433] Review Request: tor - Anonymizing overlay network for TCP (The onion router) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609211845.k8LIjeJR014986@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tor - Anonymizing overlay network for TCP (The onion router) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175433 ------- Additional Comments From david at lovesunix.net 2006-09-21 14:45 EST ------- it might just be me but does the tsocks package require... tsocks? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 21 18:53:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 14:53:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201000] Review Request: libFoundation - A free implementation of OpenStep's Foundation Kit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609211853.k8LIrvvm016264@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libFoundation - A free implementation of OpenStep's Foundation Kit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201000 ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2006-09-21 14:53 EST ------- (In reply to comment #6) > Yet another case of a package polluting /usr/include. > > IMO, /usr/include/extensions definitely is too general to be acceptable, the > headers in /usr/include/ are arguable. > > I strongly recommend to move all /usr/include/* to a subdirectory. I'm inclined to agree. Axel? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 21 19:09:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 15:09:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 175433] Review Request: tor - Anonymizing overlay network for TCP (The onion router) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609211909.k8LJ9X7g017681@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tor - Anonymizing overlay network for TCP (The onion router) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175433 ------- Additional Comments From enrico.scholz at informatik.tu-chemnitz.de 2006-09-21 15:09 EST ------- Although tsocks issues were discussed some comments above already, I will remove torify for now and add it back when tsocks exists. * Thu Sep 21 2006 Enrico Scholz - 0.1.1.23-2 - simplified things yet more and removed tsocks/torify too - build -lsb unconditionally http://ensc.de/fedora/tor/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 21 19:13:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 15:13:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201000] Review Request: libFoundation - A free implementation of OpenStep's Foundation Kit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609211913.k8LJDXUM017957@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libFoundation - A free implementation of OpenStep's Foundation Kit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201000 ------- Additional Comments From Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net 2006-09-21 15:13 EST ------- Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~athimm/fedorasubmit/libFoundation/libFoundation.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~athimm/fedorasubmit/libFoundation/libFoundation-1.1.3-10.at.src.rpm * Wed Sep 20 2006 Axel Thimm - 1.1.3-10 - With the FHS changes some %%_includedir entries appeared as duplicates. Addresses the open issues from comment #4. Wrt to moving includedirs around I prefer not to. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 21 19:31:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 15:31:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187433] Review Request: acx-kmod - Open ACX100/ACX111 wireless NIC driver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609211931.k8LJVLHL019426@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: acx-kmod - Open ACX100/ACX111 wireless NIC driver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187433 ville.skytta at iki.fi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 21 19:57:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 15:57:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192434] Review Request: compiz-quinn In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609211957.k8LJvuTn021509@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compiz-quinn https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192434 alcapcom at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 21 20:14:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 16:14:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196669] Review Request: filesystem-i18n In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609212014.k8LKEkqA022712@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: filesystem-i18n https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196669 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-09-21 16:14 EST ------- Bill, are you really gonna take this, or should Robert be the one to submit a new/updated package to review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 21 20:17:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 16:17:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196669] Review Request: filesystem-i18n In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609212017.k8LKH2b3022865@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: filesystem-i18n https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196669 ------- Additional Comments From notting at redhat.com 2006-09-21 16:16 EST ------- I'll get to it... need to go play with repoquery. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 21 20:24:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 16:24:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192434] Review Request: compiz-quinn In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609212024.k8LKOMfn023247@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compiz-quinn https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192434 ------- Additional Comments From alcapcom at gmail.com 2006-09-21 16:24 EST ------- I tested the fork on a fresh FC5 installation. Here are de dependencies that i have installed (if that can helped somebody): autoconf.noarch 2.59-7 automake.noarch 1.9.6-2 libtool.i386 1.5.22-2.3 libXcomposite-devel.i386 0.2.2.2-2.2 libXdamage-devel.i386 1.0.2.2-2.2 startup-notification-devel.i386 0.8-3.2.1 imake.i386 1.0.1-3 dbus-devel.i386 0.61-3.fc5.1 libcroco-devel.i386 0.6.1-1 libgsf-devel.i386 1.13.3-2.2.1 librsvg2-devel.i386 2.14.4-1.fc5.1 libwnck-devel.i386 2.14.3-1.fc5 The developers does not propose packages yet and wait until a first stable release before providing theirs debian packages. I think that, it would be well if we prepare these packages in advance. Like that once a stable version relesead, we will be able to release it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 21 20:26:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 16:26:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207607] New: Review Request: telepathy-butterfly - MSN connection manager for Telepathy Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207607 Summary: Review Request: telepathy-butterfly - MSN connection manager for Telepathy Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: bdpepple at ameritech.net QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://piedmont.homelinux.org/fedora/telepathy/telepathy-butterfly.spec SRPM URL: http://piedmont.homelinux.org/fedora/telepathy/telepathy-butterfly-0.1.0-1.src.rpm Description: An MSN connection manager for Telepathy that handles presence, personal messages, and conversations Notes: 1. This package needs a filesystem package for telepathy to handle ownership of the connection managers directory, since there will be many connection managers in the future. See below for the spec file for this package. 2. Targetted for FC6. To build on FC5 it will need to be patched to find the correct directory for the dbus service file. Spec URL: http://piedmont.homelinux.org/fedora/telepathy/telepathy-filesystem.spec SRPM: http://piedmont.homelinux.org/fedora/telepathy/telepathy-filesystem-0.0.1-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 21 20:27:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 16:27:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207607] Review Request: telepathy-butterfly - MSN connection manager for Telepathy In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609212027.k8LKRSPj023558@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: telepathy-butterfly - MSN connection manager for Telepathy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207607 bdpepple at ameritech.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |207173 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 21 20:27:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 16:27:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207173] Review Request: pymsn - Python libraries for MSN Messenger network In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609212027.k8LKRT0R023570@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pymsn - Python libraries for MSN Messenger network https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207173 bdpepple at ameritech.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |207607 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 21 20:52:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 16:52:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203694] Review Request: rawstudio - digital camera raw-image converter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609212052.k8LKqcNa026144@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rawstudio - digital camera raw-image converter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203694 ------- Additional Comments From giallu at gmail.com 2006-09-21 16:52 EST ------- Sorry for the delay. it seems gmail started tagging as SPAM a lot of fedora related stuff, including bugzilla mails :( I will look at the missing pieces for the cvs access tomorrow THANKS A LOT! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 21 20:53:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 16:53:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177583] Review Request: zaptel-kmod In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609212053.k8LKreH4026280@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: zaptel-kmod https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177583 ------- Additional Comments From jeff at ocjtech.us 2006-09-21 16:53 EST ------- (In reply to comment #49) > While there isn't yet a hard rule against modules that don't plan upstream > inclusion, there are a number of folks in FESCo that don't want to approve > modules that don't plan upstream inclusion. > > Any word from Digium if they might change their minds on that point? I haven't heard anything, but I haven't been asking either. I've had to put any work on Asterisk stuff to the side as things at work have gotten very busy lately. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 21 21:23:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 17:23:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207612] New: Review Request: zidrav - Zorba's Incredible Data Repairer And Verifier Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207612 Summary: Review Request: zidrav - Zorba's Incredible Data Repairer And Verifier Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rpm at greysector.net QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://rpm.greysector.net/extras/zidrav.spec SRPM URL: http://rpm.greysector.net/extras/zidrav-1.2.0-1.src.rpm Description: ZIDRAV stands for "Zorba's Incredible Data Repairer And Verifier", and is an extremely useful tool for cross-checking files that have been transfered via HTTP, FTP, or some other method. What it does, is generates a checksum file, and then by comparing that checksum with the original file, it creates a patch file that can repair the corrupted file. Very cool, and saves re-downloading. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 21 21:32:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 17:32:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207612] Review Request: zidrav - Zorba's Incredible Data Repairer And Verifier In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609212132.k8LLWWbt028499@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: zidrav - Zorba's Incredible Data Repairer And Verifier https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207612 ------- Additional Comments From scott at perturb.org 2006-09-21 17:32 EST ------- File matches upstream: 51f90a85723cae6f925efde35ce124c9 zidrav4unix-1.2.0.tar.gz 51f90a85723cae6f925efde35ce124c9 /tmp/zidrav4unix-1.2.0.tar.gz Licence is GPL - correct Buildroot is correct Rpmlint is clean on the binary and source RPM Make uses SMP flags - good I would change the "make" and "rm" lines in the install/clean sections %{__make} and %{__rm}. What exactly does the rpm-patch do? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 21 21:36:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 17:36:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207612] Review Request: zidrav - Zorba's Incredible Data Repairer And Verifier In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609212136.k8LLaDaW028714@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: zidrav - Zorba's Incredible Data Repairer And Verifier https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207612 ------- Additional Comments From scott at perturb.org 2006-09-21 17:36 EST ------- Have you submitted the RPM patch upstream? It's always best to get the source patched upstream so the RPM isn't required to carry a patch that may get out of date. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 21 21:37:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 17:37:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201149] Review Request: Flexible WebServer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609212137.k8LLbmkq028846@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Flexible WebServer Alias: Cherokee https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201149 s.adam at diffingo.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |s.adam at diffingo.com ------- Additional Comments From s.adam at diffingo.com 2006-09-21 17:37 EST ------- (I'm not a reviewer but just helping out) One of the Fedora Extras guidelines and requirements is to run rpmlint on each package - I ran it on your SRPM and it produced: *** output: *** W: cherokee non-standard-group Productivity/Networking/Web/Servers The value of the Group tag in the package is not valid. Valid groups are: "Amusements/Games", "Amusements/Graphics", "Applications/Archiving", "Applications/Communications", "Applications/Databases", "Applications/Editors", "Applications/Emulators", "Applications/Engineering", "Applications/File", "Applications/Internet", "Applications/Multimedia", "Applications/Productivity", "Applications/Publishing", "Applications/System", "Applications/Text", "Development/Debug", "Development/Debuggers", "Development/Languages", "Development/Libraries", "Development/System", "Development/Tools", "Documentation", "System Environment/Base", "System Environment/Daemons", "System Environment/Kernel", "System Environment/Libraries", "System Environment/Shells", "User Interface/Desktops", "User Interface/X", "User Interface/X Hardware Support". E: cherokee no-changelogname-tag There is no %changelog tag in your spec file. To insert it, just insert a '%changelog' in your spec file and rebuild it. E: cherokee unknown-key GPG#6b9d6523 The package was signed, but with an unknown key. See the rpm --import option for more information. E: cherokee no-cleaning-of-buildroot You should clean $RPM_BUILD_ROOT in the %clean section and just after the beginning of %install section. Use "rm -Rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT". *** end output **** Don't worry about the GPG warning, it's just because it's signed with a key rpmlint doesn't know. I don't think you need to worry about the invalid group, although I would make it one of the 'standard' ones just for the sake of getting rid of the warning. The E:'s you should look into, especially the changelog. Another requirement is to have a changelog entry for each release you push, so that's a good one to have! Even if all it says is something like "initial build", that's OK. As long as there's an entry for each version you make. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 21 21:39:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 17:39:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207612] Review Request: zidrav - Zorba's Incredible Data Repairer And Verifier In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609212139.k8LLdd0j029116@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: zidrav - Zorba's Incredible Data Repairer And Verifier https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207612 ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2006-09-21 17:39 EST ------- New specfile uploaded: http://rpm.greysector.net/extras/zidrav.spec The patch makes the Makefile use RPM_OPT_FLAGS and adds an install: section with DESTDIR. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 21 21:40:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 17:40:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207612] Review Request: zidrav - Zorba's Incredible Data Repairer And Verifier In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609212140.k8LLeJOu029186@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: zidrav - Zorba's Incredible Data Repairer And Verifier https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207612 ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2006-09-21 17:40 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > Have you submitted the RPM patch upstream? It's always best to get the source > patched upstream so the RPM isn't required to carry a patch that may get out of > date. Not yet, but I will. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 21 21:48:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 17:48:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207612] Review Request: zidrav - Zorba's Incredible Data Repairer And Verifier In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609212148.k8LLmqn2029656@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: zidrav - Zorba's Incredible Data Repairer And Verifier https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207612 ------- Additional Comments From scott at perturb.org 2006-09-21 17:48 EST ------- My incredibly picky eye can't find anything else wrong with this package. I don't see anything else to fix. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 21 21:55:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 17:55:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199780] Review Request: dstat In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609212155.k8LLtL8V029918@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dstat https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199780 scott at perturb.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE Fixed In Version| |0.6.3-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 21 21:56:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 17:56:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177583] Review Request: zaptel-kmod In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609212156.k8LLuQaQ030049@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: zaptel-kmod https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177583 kpfleming at digium.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kpfleming at digium.com ------- Additional Comments From kpfleming at digium.com 2006-09-21 17:56 EST ------- I'll try to address your concerns, but understand that we fight this battle every day with people who don't agree with our dual licensing model (or dual licensing in general), so I don't expect to change your minds :-) In regards to the question about Zaptel being GPL and not being usable under other licenses, that is not true. There are parts of Zaptel that are most definitely not derivatives of the Linux kernel and we want to retain the ability to license those parts of Zaptel outside the GPL. Stating that 'Zaptel is GPL' is somewhat of a simplification, because in reality you mean that 'the Zaptel distributed by Digium via their web/FTP servers is GPL', but we have the ability to distribute it via other means as well. As far as the 2.4 kernel issue goes, we definitely do consider that to be a concern, because we have limited kernel developer resources and don't wish to spend their time duplicating efforts, and there is still rather a large population of users running Zaptel on 2.4 kernels (we have received bug reports as recently as this week regarding new drivers we have not building/installing on 2.4). However, that is secondary to the licensing issue in any case. I can tell you that it is highly unlikely that Digium would decide to change the licensing model for Zaptel just so that it can be incorporated into Fedora Extras. While I don't wish to start a flamewar, I do find it somewhat curious that Debian does package Zaptel and they generally seem to be even more restrictive regarding licensing that most other distributions are... but I understand that your concern here is not the licensing issue, but our non-interest in pushing the Zaptel drivers upstream into the mainline kernel. I've added myself to the CC list for this issue; I'm happy to answer your questions and try to provide any technical assistance required, but the licensing issues are what they are. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 21 22:01:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 18:01:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206836] Review Request: TurboJson - Python template plugin that supports json In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609212201.k8LM1bTO030305@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: TurboJson - Python template plugin that supports json https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206836 s.adam at diffingo.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |s.adam at diffingo.com ------- Additional Comments From s.adam at diffingo.com 2006-09-21 18:01 EST ------- I'm not a reviewer, but can help you out: I can't seem to build your source RPM, I am getting: File not found by glob: /var/tmp/TurboJson-0.9.9-1-root-admin/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/turbojson/tests/*.py* If I list files in [buildroot]/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/turbojson/ I only see files. Maybe there is an error in the spec? But, on a good note, your rpmlint check is clean. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 21 22:11:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 18:11:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206708] Review Request: acerhk - Acer Hotkey driver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609212211.k8LMBa6d031004@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: acerhk - Acer Hotkey driver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206708 s.adam at diffingo.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |s.adam at diffingo.com ------- Additional Comments From s.adam at diffingo.com 2006-09-21 18:11 EST ------- I'm not a reviewer, but I can do what I can to help. rpmlint on both the binary (for i686 at least) and SRPMS comes out clean, and they build flawlessly on my machine. I have no complaints here, you have a pretty clean package! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 21 22:39:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 18:39:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207612] Review Request: zidrav - Zorba's Incredible Data Repairer And Verifier In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609212239.k8LMdV7s001600@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: zidrav - Zorba's Incredible Data Repairer And Verifier https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207612 ------- Additional Comments From denis at poolshark.org 2006-09-21 18:39 EST ------- Don't mean to nitpick but is your CXXFLAGS patch working ? It looks like it is still compiling with the default options... I think you also need to pass it on the make call ('make CXXFLAGS=...'). + unset DISPLAY + CXXFLAGS='-O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m32 -march=i386 -mtune=generic -fasynchronous-unwind-tables' + export CXXFLAGS + /usr/bin/make -j3 g++ -O2 -Wall -c flayer.cpp g++ -O2 -Wall -c core.cpp g++ -O2 -Wall -o zidrav zidrav.cpp flayer.o core.o -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 21 22:45:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 18:45:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201149] Review Request: Flexible WebServer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609212245.k8LMjlIr002061@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Flexible WebServer Alias: Cherokee https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201149 opensource at till.name changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |opensource at till.name ------- Additional Comments From opensource at till.name 2006-09-21 18:45 EST ------- I just took a look into http://manuel.todo-linux.com/cherokee/spec/cherokee.spec and there is a lot that should be fixed. Please read http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines %configure already sets these options: --prefix=%{_prefix} \ --sysconfdir=%{_sysconfdir} \ --mandir=%{_mandir} \ --sbindir=%{_sbindir} \ So they are not needed here. (see rpm --eval "%configure") %configure also sets CFLAGS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS" So you should set CFLAGS="-O0 -g3" before the invocation of %configure to make sure that $RPM_OPT_FLAGS are honourd. Do you really need debug level 3 and no optimization? Why are these commands in %post? ln -s %{_sysconfdir}/cherokee/sites-available/default \ %{_sysconfdir}/cherokee/sites-enabled/default mkdir -p /home/httpd The COPYING file is missing There is an unneeded Source:, since there is already Source0: Why is there still a Docdir Tag? Why don't you use %{?dist} in the release? The %changelog is still empty. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 21 23:32:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 19:32:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188400] Review Request: ssmtp In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609212332.k8LNWGIJ004521@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ssmtp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188400 s.adam at diffingo.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |s.adam at diffingo.com ------- Additional Comments From s.adam at diffingo.com 2006-09-21 19:32 EST ------- I'm not a review but I'm waiting on the sponsor of my package so I'll help... Just so you know your SRPM link gives a 404, it seemed to be moved into a "rpms" folder. I ran rpmlint on your SRPM, and it gave only warnings, no errors, which is good but if you'd like to clear them up anyways, here it is: W: ssmtp macro-in-%changelog files Macros are expanded in %changelog too, which can in unfortunate cases lead to the package not building at all, or other subtle unexpected conditions that affect the build. Even when that doesn't happen, the expansion results in possibly "rewriting history" on subsequent package revisions and generally odd entries eg. in source rpms, which is rarely wanted. Avoid use of macros in %changelog altogether, or use two '%'s to escape them, like '%%foo'. W: ssmtp macro-in-%changelog postun Macros are expanded in %changelog too, which can in unfortunate cases lead to the package not building at all, or other subtle unexpected conditions that affect the build. Even when that doesn't happen, the expansion results in possibly "rewriting history" on subsequent package revisions and generally odd entries eg. in source rpms, which is rarely wanted. Avoid use of macros in %changelog altogether, or use two '%'s to escape them, like '%%foo'. W: ssmtp macro-in-%changelog buildroot Macros are expanded in %changelog too, which can in unfortunate cases lead to the package not building at all, or other subtle unexpected conditions that affect the build. Even when that doesn't happen, the expansion results in possibly "rewriting history" on subsequent package revisions and generally odd entries eg. in source rpms, which is rarely wanted. Avoid use of macros in %changelog altogether, or use two '%'s to escape them, like '%%foo'. W: ssmtp mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs The specfile mixes use of spaces and tabs for indentation, which is a cosmetic annoyance. Use either spaces or tabs for indentation, not both. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 21 23:45:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 19:45:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196434] Review Request: ren In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609212345.k8LNjLfO005027@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ren https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196434 s.adam at diffingo.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |s.adam at diffingo.com ------- Additional Comments From s.adam at diffingo.com 2006-09-21 19:45 EST ------- I'm not a reviewer, as I'm waiting to be sponsored, but I can help out: rpmlint still shows warning on the RPM, I'm not sure if you're absolutely required to fix these as they're minor, but they're there nonetheless: W: ren setup-not-quiet You should use -q to have a quiet extraction of the source tarball, as this generate useless lines of log ( for buildbot, for example ) W: ren macro-in-%changelog defattr Macros are expanded in %changelog too, which can in unfortunate cases lead to the package not building at all, or other subtle unexpected conditions that affect the build. Even when that doesn't happen, the expansion results in possibly "rewriting history" on subsequent package revisions and generally odd entries eg. in source rpms, which is rarely wanted. Avoid use of macros in %changelog altogether, or use two '%'s to escape them, like '%%foo'. W: ren macro-in-%changelog _mandir Macros are expanded in %changelog too, which can in unfortunate cases lead to the package not building at all, or other subtle unexpected conditions that affect the build. Even when that doesn't happen, the expansion results in possibly "rewriting history" on subsequent package revisions and generally odd entries eg. in source rpms, which is rarely wanted. Avoid use of macros in %changelog altogether, or use two '%'s to escape them, like '%%foo'. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 22 00:24:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 20:24:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207612] Review Request: zidrav - Zorba's Incredible Data Repairer And Verifier In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609220024.k8M0OqhC006644@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: zidrav - Zorba's Incredible Data Repairer And Verifier https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207612 ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2006-09-21 20:24 EST ------- I uploaded a testing spec version by mistake, fixed. You can clearly see that this was done so in .src.rpm (I'm not reuploading it since nothing was changed except the spec). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 22 00:42:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 20:42:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205075] Review Request: fwbackups - a user backup program, with support for automated backups and on-demand backups In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609220042.k8M0gqev007587@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fwbackups - a user backup program, with support for automated backups and on-demand backups https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205075 ------- Additional Comments From s.adam at diffingo.com 2006-09-21 20:42 EST ------- I've added the pygtk2-libglade %requires. Spec URL: http://www.diffingo.com/downloads/FWBackups/fwbackups.spec SRPM URL: http://www.diffingo.com/downloads/FWBackups/fwbackups-1.42-5.src.rpm rpmlint on SRPM only warns of mixed space/tabs, nothing to worry about, and rpmlint is silent on binary. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 22 01:38:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 21:38:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188400] Review Request: ssmtp In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609220138.k8M1c7PQ010010@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ssmtp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188400 ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2006-09-21 21:38 EST ------- Thank you for the review. I am sorry for the annoyance due to reorganizing the web site. New spec and src.rpm are available at http://wdl.lug.ro/linux/rpms/ssmtp/ssmtp.spec and http://wdl.lug.ro/linux/rpms/ssmtp/ssmtp-2.61-6.src.rpm respectively -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 22 01:43:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 21:43:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196434] Review Request: ren In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609220143.k8M1hGCZ010254@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ren https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196434 ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2006-09-21 21:43 EST ------- Thank you for your review. New versions are available at http://wdl.lug.ro/linux/rpms/ren/ren.spec and http://wdl.lug.ro/linux/rpms/ren/ren-1.0-9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 22 01:47:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 21:47:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177583] Review Request: zaptel-kmod In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609220147.k8M1llq4010407@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: zaptel-kmod https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177583 ------- Additional Comments From dennis at ausil.us 2006-09-21 21:47 EST ------- Licensing is not the issue at all, dual licensing is perfectly acceptable. The issue at hand is merging zaptel into Linus's tree. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 22 02:10:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 22:10:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188400] Review Request: ssmtp In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609220210.k8M2AwaR011621@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ssmtp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188400 ------- Additional Comments From s.adam at diffingo.com 2006-09-21 22:10 EST ------- No problem - rpmlint now's clean, I looked over the spec and it seems valid. Clean by as far as I can tell! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 22 02:15:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 22:15:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196434] Review Request: ren In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609220215.k8M2FFxh012224@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ren https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196434 ------- Additional Comments From s.adam at diffingo.com 2006-09-21 22:15 EST ------- Excellent - rpmlint's clean on both SRPM and binary RPM. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 22 02:40:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 22:40:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191389] Review Request: oooqs2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609220240.k8M2ehsh014875@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: oooqs2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191389 dennis at ausil.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From dennis at ausil.us 2006-09-21 22:40 EST ------- ok built on all arches now :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 22 03:54:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 23:54:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 195683] Review Request: smarteiffel - The GNU Eiffel Compiler and Libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609220354.k8M3s341021544@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: smarteiffel - The GNU Eiffel Compiler and Libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195683 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-09-21 23:54 EST ------- After running through my checklist, the only remaining issue I have is that the installed package is about 91MB, but 68MB of that is documentation which does bring up the question of whether the documentation should be in a subpackage. What do you think? (Honestly I'd prefer not to have to build this again, but there really is a big pile of documentation there.) 68128 ./usr/share/doc 81508 ./usr/share 91228 ./usr 91244 . * source files match upstream: 77b3ab3895c6fced2cb1649b4ca80547 SmartEiffel-2-2.tar.bz2 * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * dist tag is present. * build root is correct. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. License text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper (none) * compiler flags are appropriate. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * package installs properly * debuginfo would be empty and is disabled. * rpmlint has only acceptable complaints. * final provides and requires are sane: config(smarteiffel) = 2.2-4.fc6 smarteiffel = 2.2-4.fc6 = /bin/sh config(smarteiffel) = 2.2-4.fc6 * %check is not present; no runnable test suite. * no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. * package is not relocatable. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. ? documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * headers (and various source files) are installed as appropriate for a compiler. * no pkgconfig files. * no libtool .la droppings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 22 04:20:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 00:20:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198839] Review Request: sear - WorldForge client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609220420.k8M4KdYl023419@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sear - WorldForge client Alias: sear https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198839 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|chris.stone at gmail.com |nobody at fedoraproject.org OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163776 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2006-09-22 00:20 EST ------- Is there any reason why this is only being built for FC6? I don't think I should be reviewing this package if it is only for FC6 as I would have no way of actually testing it unless I installed FC6. I'm going to go ahead and set this back to FE-NEW since I have no way of testing this package. Sorry. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 22 05:32:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (Red Hat Bugzilla) Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 01:32:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198711] Review Request: splint - An implementation of the lint program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609220532.k8M5WXAA027220@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: splint - An implementation of the lint program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198711 jturner at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|RAWHIDE |CURRENTRELEASE Fixed In Version| |5.0.0 ------- Additional Comments From jturner at redhat.com 2006-09-22 01:32 EST ------- [jturner at porkchop 4.91]$ pwd /mnt/redhat/rel-eng/RHEL5-Server-20060919.1/4.91 [jturner at porkchop 4.91]$ find . -name "splint*" -print ./i386/os/Server/splint-3.1.1-16.el5.i386.rpm ./i386/debug/splint-debuginfo-3.1.1-16.el5.i386.rpm ./ppc/os/Server/splint-3.1.1-16.el5.ppc.rpm ./ppc/debug/splint-debuginfo-3.1.1-16.el5.ppc.rpm ./x86_64/os/Server/splint-3.1.1-16.el5.x86_64.rpm ./x86_64/debug/splint-debuginfo-3.1.1-16.el5.x86_64.rpm ./ia64/os/Server/splint-3.1.1-16.el5.ia64.rpm ./ia64/debug/splint-debuginfo-3.1.1-16.el5.ia64.rpm ./s390x/os/Server/splint-3.1.1-16.el5.s390x.rpm ./s390x/debug/splint-debuginfo-3.1.1-16.el5.s390x.rpm ./source/SRPMS/splint-3.1.1-16.el5.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 22 10:09:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 06:09:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201006] Review Request: HelixPlayer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609221009.k8MA9XC8012363@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: HelixPlayer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201006 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at leemhuis.info 2006-09-22 06:09 EST ------- (In reply to comment #7) > Michael, if you like the changes, just use them, and HelixPlayer will be good to > import as far as I'm concerned. Wouldn't it be simply better now if you Aurelien submits Helix for review and someone else reviews it? (maybe even mjk?) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 22 10:41:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 06:41:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201006] Review Request: HelixPlayer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609221041.k8MAfH5F014053@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: HelixPlayer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201006 ------- Additional Comments From gauret at free.fr 2006-09-22 06:41 EST ------- I could do that, but I'm not really interested in maintaining it. So I'm ok with submitting it as long as Michael swears he'll take it over later on ;) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 22 11:19:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 07:19:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201006] Review Request: HelixPlayer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609221119.k8MBJbnn016633@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: HelixPlayer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201006 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at leemhuis.info 2006-09-22 07:19 EST ------- (In reply to comment #9) > I could do that, but I'm not really interested in maintaining it. > So I'm ok with submitting it as long as Michael swears he'll take it over later > on ;) Quoting https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-extras-list/2006-September/msg00430.html "Once Fedora Core/Extras 6 is released, I will put all my packages up on the orphans wiki page." It IMHO doesn't help much to get a package in FE6 without a maintainer for the longer term... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 22 12:17:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 08:17:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201006] Review Request: HelixPlayer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609221217.k8MCHvTn019491@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: HelixPlayer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201006 ------- Additional Comments From gauret at free.fr 2006-09-22 08:17 EST ------- > It IMHO doesn't help much to get a package in FE6 without a maintainer for the > longer term... My point exactly. Michael also said that he'll be able to contribute again once he has more time. I'm willing to maintain HelixPlayer for a couple of months (or half a year, or even for a year if need be) as long as I don't have to maintain it for all eternity. OK, so if you guys want to review this : http://gauret.free.fr/fichiers/rpms/fedora/HelixPlayer-1.0.7-2.src.rpm It's basically an rpmbuild -bs on the spec file in comment 7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 22 14:09:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 10:09:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193898] Review Request: Jython - Java source interpreter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609221409.k8ME9fKa028240@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Jython - Java source interpreter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193898 ------- Additional Comments From ifoox at redhat.com 2006-09-22 10:09 EST ------- New files: http://people.redhat.com/ifoox/extras/jython.spec http://people.redhat.com/ifoox/extras/jython-2.2-0.a0.2jpp_4fc.src.rpm I've fixed the problem with the non-executable scripts by bringing back jython's copy of python2.2 which was carried in the srpm, since it doesn't actually work when I link it against python 2.4. I think that the no-manifest issue can be ignored since the example jar works fine anyway. If you think that that the license issue is OK then I think this is pretty much done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 22 14:24:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 10:24:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207676] New: Review Request: SDL_pango - Rendering of internationalized text for SDL Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207676 Summary: Review Request: SDL_pango - Rendering of internationalized text for SDL Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: matthias at rpmforge.net QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://ftp.es6.freshrpms.net/tmp/extras/SDL_Pango.spec Source URL: http://heanet.dl.sf.net/sdlpango/SDL_Pango-0.1.2.tar.gz Description: Pango is the text rendering engine of GNOME 2. SDL_Pango connects that engine to SDL, the Simple DirectMedia Layer. Note1: Pretty simple package, nothing fancy or complicated. Note2: There are a few compile warnings on the SDL_pango.h file that it would be nice to fix. If someone has C knowledge to do that, please feel free to propose a quick patch. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 22 14:29:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 10:29:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193898] Review Request: Jython - Java source interpreter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609221429.k8METZWF029891@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Jython - Java source interpreter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193898 ------- Additional Comments From ifoox at redhat.com 2006-09-22 10:29 EST ------- New files: http://people.redhat.com/ifoox/extras/jython.spec http://people.redhat.com/ifoox/extras/jython-2.2-0.a0.2jpp_5fc.src.rpm Minor fix, removing redundant patch. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 22 15:16:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 11:16:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 195683] Review Request: smarteiffel - The GNU Eiffel Compiler and Libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609221516.k8MFGfJF000830@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: smarteiffel - The GNU Eiffel Compiler and Libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195683 ------- Additional Comments From gemi at bluewin.ch 2006-09-22 11:16 EST ------- I split off a doc package with the contents of the www directory: http://math.ifi.unizh.ch/fedora/5/i386/SRPMS.gemi/smarteiffel-2.2-5.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 22 15:24:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 11:24:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207685] New: Review Request: gstreamer-plugins-farsight - GStreamer plug-ins for farsight protocol Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207685 Summary: Review Request: gstreamer-plugins-farsight - GStreamer plug-ins for farsight protocol Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: bdpepple at ameritech.net QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://piedmont.homelinux.org/fedora/telepathy/gstreamer-plugins-farsight.spec SRPM URL: http://piedmont.homelinux.org/fedora/telepathy/gstreamer-plugins-farsight-0.10.2-1.src.rpm Description: This is a set of plugins for GStreamer that will be used by Farsight for Audio/Video conferencing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 22 16:43:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 12:43:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191036] Review Request: libmp4v2 a library for handling the mp4 container format In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609221643.k8MGhUrA008167@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libmp4v2 a library for handling the mp4 container format https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191036 ------- Additional Comments From matthias at rpmforge.net 2006-09-22 12:43 EST ------- Any new info? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 22 17:18:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 13:18:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 173459] Review Request: initng In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609221718.k8MHIXET011780@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 daner964 at student.liu.se changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #136626|0 |1 is obsolete| | ------- Additional Comments From daner964 at student.liu.se 2006-09-22 13:18 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=136952) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=136952&action=view) initng 0.6.8-2 spec file (In reply to comment #327) > while I think about it... SELinux scripts and requirements should be removed > completely. FC5 policy contains already > > | /sbin/init(ng)? -- system_u:object_r:init_exec_t:s0 > > so that initng will be labeled correctly by 'rpm' itself. Something like this? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 22 17:57:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 13:57:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207532] Review Request: kbackup - Back up your data in a simple, user friendly way In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609221757.k8MHvpVk014715@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kbackup - Back up your data in a simple, user friendly way https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207532 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-09-22 13:57 EST ------- Just a quick check: A: Please see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets. then: * Icons are installed under /usr/share/icons/hicolor/. This requires some scriptlets. * Requires(post,postun) should be removed. B. rpmlint is not silent. I think this can be ignored, however, check if you can remove dangling (resolved by kdelibs) symlink. W: kbackup dangling-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/de/kbackup/common /usr/share/doc/HTML/de/common W: kbackup symlink-should-be-relative /usr/share/doc/HTML/de/kbackup/common /usr/share/doc/HTML/de/common W: kbackup dangling-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/kbackup/common /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/common W: kbackup symlink-should-be-relative /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/kbackup/common /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/common -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 22 18:27:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 14:27:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207725] New: Review Request: sshfp - Generate SSHFP DNS records from knownhosts files or ssh-keyscan Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207725 Summary: Review Request: sshfp - Generate SSHFP DNS records from knownhosts files or ssh-keyscan Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: paul at xelerance.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: ftp://ftp.xelerance.com/sshfp/sshfp.spec SRPM URL: ftp://ftp.xelerance.com/sshfp/sshfp-1.0.6-1.src.rpm Description: sshfp generates DNS SSHFP records from SSH public keys. sshfp can take public keys from a known_hosts file or from the host's sshd daemon. ssh can use these SSHFP records if you set "VerifyHostKeyDNS yes" in the file /etc/ssh/ssh_config. This package enables VerifyHostKeyDNS. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 22 18:28:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 14:28:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 173459] Review Request: initng In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609221828.k8MISVwA019069@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 enrico.scholz at informatik.tu-chemnitz.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |enrico.scholz at informatik.tu- | |chemnitz.de OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From enrico.scholz at informatik.tu-chemnitz.de 2006-09-22 14:28 EST ------- initng + initng-ifiles ---------------------- GOOD: * package follows naming guidelines * spec-file name is ok * I do not see a violation of packaging guidelines; it builds in mock and BuildRequires: are satisfying * license is ok and consistent * COPYING is shipped in package * I do not see a violation of Americon English (does not mean very much...;) ) * spec-file is ok * builds on i386 * package does not have locales which must be handled * scripts of -lib are calling 'ldconfig' * package owns all used directories resp. they are shipped by a dependency (except of the man-dir but this is accepted) * %clean section is ok * paths are macro'ized as far as possible; special paths like /boot or /sbin must be written literarily * content is ok * documentation is ok * headers/.so are in -lib * no pkgconfig issues * inter-(sub)package dependencies are ok * there are no .la archives * no desktop files needed and shipped initng ------ BLOCKER: * permissions of plugins are bad; rpmlint complains with | W: initng unstripped-binary-or-object /lib/initng/libunneeded.so | W: initng unstripped-binary-or-object /lib/initng/libsysreq.so like messages. You should add 'chmod +x /%_lib/initng/*.so' initng-ifiles ------------- BLOCKER: * fail to build: | [ 0%] Building C object tools/CMakeFiles/install_service.dir/install_service.o | distcc[3688] ERROR: compile (null) on localhost failed | /var/tmp/sessiondir-ensc.1158090336.eM4348/redhat/BUILD/initng-ifiles-0.0.6/tools/install_service.c:34:26: error: initng-paths.h: No such file or directory | /var/tmp/sessiondir-ensc.1158090336.eM4348/redhat/BUILD/initng-ifiles-0.0.6/tools/install_service.c:73: error: 'INITNG_PLUGIN_DIR' undeclared here (not in a function) | distcc[3687] ERROR: compile /var/tmp/sessiondir-ensc.1158090336.eM4348/redhat/BUILD/initng-ifiles-0.0.6/tools/install_service.c on localhost failed Probably an issue in 'initng' (unverified). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 22 19:13:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 15:13:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 173459] Review Request: initng In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609221913.k8MJD2hC022953@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 enrico.scholz at informatik.tu-chemnitz.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From enrico.scholz at informatik.tu-chemnitz.de 2006-09-22 15:13 EST ------- initng ------ MINOR (non-blocker): * the -DCMAKE_SKIP_RPATH:BOOL=ON is not needed anymore with cmake 2.4; see 'NOTE' section at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/cmake. I will accept it as-is, but it should be evaluated whether it works without this option too. BLOCKERS: * the permissions-problem affects -lib subpackage too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 22 19:14:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 15:14:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 195683] Review Request: smarteiffel - The GNU Eiffel Compiler and Libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609221914.k8MJEjJc023159@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: smarteiffel - The GNU Eiffel Compiler and Libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195683 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords|Reopened | OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-09-22 15:14 EST ------- This looks good to me. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 22 19:22:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 15:22:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203288] Review Request: devilspie In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609221922.k8MJMUIP023930@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: devilspie https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203288 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|CANTFIX |NOTABUG OtherBugsDependingO|163778, 177841 |201449 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 22 19:22:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 15:22:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204343] Review Request: qcomicbook - a comic book viewing program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609221922.k8MJMjec023971@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qcomicbook - a comic book viewing program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204343 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 22 19:25:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 15:25:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187326] Review Request: smokeping - Network latency grapher In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609221925.k8MJPiZX024241@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: smokeping - Network latency grapher https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187326 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-09-22 15:25 EST ------- So what happened? Axel assigned this to himself a month ago, but this ticket still blocks FE-NEW and no progress has been made. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 22 19:34:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 15:34:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207725] Review Request: sshfp - Generate SSHFP DNS records from knownhosts files or ssh-keyscan In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609221934.k8MJYU4T024816@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sshfp - Generate SSHFP DNS records from knownhosts files or ssh-keyscan https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207725 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tibbs at math.uh.edu ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-09-22 15:34 EST ------- This package looks fine, but I would be extremely displeased if installing this package modified my sshd_config file. This is just a package that generates some DNS records; it has no business messing about with an unrelated part of the system. Besides, I wouldn't install this package on every SSH server; I'd instead run it on my name server which has a rather more restricted SSHd configuration that, frankly, nobody but me should ever touch. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 22 19:45:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 15:45:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207725] Review Request: sshfp - Generate SSHFP DNS records from knownhosts files or ssh-keyscan In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609221945.k8MJjsiN025540@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sshfp - Generate SSHFP DNS records from knownhosts files or ssh-keyscan https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207725 ------- Additional Comments From paul at xelerance.com 2006-09-22 15:45 EST ------- It changes /etc/sshd/ssh_config not /etc/sshd/sshd_config. It only changes the behaviour of the ssh client. VerifyHostKeyDNS Specifies whether to verify the remote key using DNS and SSHFP resource records. If this option is set to ?yes?, the client will implicitly trust keys that match a secure fingerprint from DNS. Insecure fingerprints will be handled as if this option was set to ?ask?. If this option is set to ?ask?, information on fingerprint match will be displayed, but the user will still need to confirm new host keys according to the StrictHostKeyChecking option. The argument must be ?yes?, ?no? or ?ask?. The default is ?no?. Note that this option applies to protocol version 2 only. I do see your point about not installing this package everywhere, and as such enabling VerifyHostKeyDNS in the ssh client configuration is not very useful. I choose to enable it so that I can generate sshfp records on the same machine that I use to test the SSHFP records work properly. Do you still think it is a problem to enable this? The user will still be prompted for the new key, but an additional message appears saying the key matches the DNS entry for it. Extra big warning banners happen when you're being MITM'ed by someone redirecting your port 22 stream. I don't understand why RedHat does not enable VerifyHostKeyDNS. It only adds to security, at the expense of one DNS lookup. Especially with the first DNSSEC TLD's being in full production (amonst them all of RIPE-NCC's reverse!) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 22 19:47:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 15:47:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187326] Review Request: smokeping - Network latency grapher In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609221947.k8MJlnFs025752@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: smokeping - Network latency grapher https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187326 Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net |nobody at fedoraproject.org ------- Additional Comments From Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net 2006-09-22 15:47 EST ------- Andreas wanted to update the package before the review, I've been waiting for that to happen. I'll revert the assignment to better reflect the current status. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 22 19:59:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 15:59:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207741] New: Review Request: colorsvn - subversion output colorizer Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207741 Summary: Review Request: colorsvn - subversion output colorizer Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: vklein at console-colors.de QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.console-colors.de/downloads/colorsvn/colorsvn.spec SRPM URL: http://www.console-colors.de/downloads/colorsvn/colorsvn-0.3.1-1.src.rpm Description: colorsvn is the Subversion output colorizer. Colorsvn was extracted from kde-sdk and was extended with build process and configuration. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 22 20:03:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 16:03:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207741] Review Request: colorsvn - subversion output colorizer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609222003.k8MK33pR026777@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: colorsvn - subversion output colorizer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207741 vklein at console-colors.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: colorsvn - |Review Request: colorsvn - |subversion output colorizer |subversion output colorizer OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |177841 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From vklein at console-colors.de 2006-09-22 16:02 EST ------- This is my first package, so I am looking for a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 22 20:12:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 16:12:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199405] Review Request: vtk - The Visualization Toolkit - A high level 3D visualization library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609222012.k8MKCel5027407@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vtk - The Visualization Toolkit - A high level 3D visualization library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199405 qspencer at ieee.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |qspencer at ieee.org ------- Additional Comments From qspencer at ieee.org 2006-09-22 16:12 EST ------- I'm trying to build a VTK application and I saw that a package is being reviewed, so I built your SRPM and tried it. I'm running into compilation errors associated with the other application, and I'm starting to think the bug is in VTK. It's looking for headers in paths that include the build path for the VTK SRPM. I started greping the libraries and found that there are a lot of strings in the libraries that contain the build path. The following example illustrates the problem: strings /usr/lib/libvtkCommon.so | grep VTK/Common It seems that either some cmake configure option is missing, or there is some bug in VTK itself. Unfortunately this is the first time I have used cmake, so I'm not able to debug this any further. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 22 20:57:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 16:57:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188477] Review Request: maildrop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609222057.k8MKvQoi000493@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: maildrop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188477 ------- Additional Comments From johan-fedora at deds.nl 2006-09-22 16:57 EST ------- (In reply to comment #8) > Check this: Looks great. In comment #1 Michael proposed to submit that package for review in Extras. Is that offer still available? Otherwise I could make this my first package contribution to FE, but I'm pretty confident that would take more time then when Michael puts his package up for review. In any case, I don't think courier-authlib is a blocker for this review. The maildrop package can always be 'improved' when/if courier-authlib becomes available in FE. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 22 20:59:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 16:59:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199405] Review Request: vtk - The Visualization Toolkit - A high level 3D visualization library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609222059.k8MKx2Mk000686@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vtk - The Visualization Toolkit - A high level 3D visualization library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199405 ------- Additional Comments From Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net 2006-09-22 16:59 EST ------- The strings I see from the command above are harmless in the sense that they are assertion messages. E.g. if the code hits an internal bug it would issue a warning/error revealing the original path of the source file. But you could post the actual errors you see in the dependent application. Although technically one should wait until this package get through the review - due to patent issues it might even not make it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 22 21:02:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 17:02:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188477] Review Request: maildrop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609222102.k8ML2tOX001524@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: maildrop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188477 johan-fedora at deds.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From johan-fedora at deds.nl 2006-09-22 17:02 EST ------- Removing FE-NEEDSPONSOR since Neal is in cvsextras -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 22 21:46:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 17:46:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207761] New: Review Request: xpdf - A PDF file viewer for the X Window System Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207761 Summary: Review Request: xpdf - A PDF file viewer for the X Window System Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: tcallawa at redhat.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/xpdf.spec SRPM URL: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/xpdf-3.01-17.fc6.src.rpm Description: Xpdf is an X Window System based viewer for Portable Document Format (PDF) files. Xpdf is a small and efficient program which uses standard X fonts. This package is moving from Fedora Core to Fedora Extras. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 22 21:54:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 17:54:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207761] Review Request: xpdf - A PDF file viewer for the X Window System In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609222154.k8MLs53L005544@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xpdf - A PDF file viewer for the X Window System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207761 jkeating at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jkeating at redhat.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-09-22 17:53 EST ------- Taking this review, will have feedback later tonight. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 22 21:54:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 17:54:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207763] New: Review Request: ddd - GUI for several command-line debuggers Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207763 Summary: Review Request: ddd - GUI for several command-line debuggers Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: tcallawa at redhat.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/ddd.spec SRPM URL: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/ddd-3.3.11-8.fc6.src.rpm Description: The Data Display Debugger (DDD) is a popular GUI for command-line debuggers like GDB, DBX, JDB, WDB, XDB, the Perl debugger, and the Python debugger. DDD allows you to view source texts and provides an interactive graphical data display, in which data structures are displayed as graphs. You can use your mouse to dereference pointers or view structure contents, which are updated every time the program stops. DDD can debug programs written in Ada, C, C++, Chill, Fortran, Java, Modula, Pascal, Perl, and Python. DDD provides machine-level debugging; hypertext source navigation and lookup; breakpoint, watchpoint, backtrace, and history editors; array plots; undo and redo; preferences and settings editors; program execution in the terminal emulation window, debugging on a remote host, an on-line manual, extensive help on the Motif user interface, and a command-line interface with full editing, history and completion capabilities. This package is moving from Fedora Core to Fedora Extras. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 22 21:56:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 17:56:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207763] Review Request: ddd - GUI for several command-line debuggers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609222156.k8MLuAJm005696@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ddd - GUI for several command-line debuggers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207763 jkeating at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jkeating at redhat.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-09-22 17:55 EST ------- Taking this review, will have feedback tonight. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 22 22:08:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 18:08:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193106] Review Request: gtkmozembedmm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609222208.k8MM8ldk006408@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtkmozembedmm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193106 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-09-22 18:08 EST ------- Removing FE-NEEDSPONSOR blocker, as submitter was sponsored in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193109 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 22 22:14:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 18:14:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207725] Review Request: sshfp - Generate SSHFP DNS records from knownhosts files or ssh-keyscan In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609222214.k8MME86U006583@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sshfp - Generate SSHFP DNS records from knownhosts files or ssh-keyscan https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207725 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-09-22 18:14 EST ------- My apologies; I misread the %post script. But still, I don't personally think it's appropriate for a package to mess with the config files of a mostly unrelated pacakge. Perhaps if the package installed some library necessary that enabled the ssh client to use this functionality, but even that is questionable. (Witness the problems with Spamassassin automatically enabling some functionality when certain Perl modules are installed. In that case there isn't even config file munging and there is still a general dislike of this kind of action at a distance.) Perhaps someone else will have a differing opinion. I don't really know why this isn't enabled by default; perhaps the additional DNS lookup is problematic. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 22 22:22:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 18:22:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191036] Review Request: libmp4v2 a library for handling the mp4 container format In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609222222.k8MMMFnY006955@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libmp4v2 a library for handling the mp4 container format https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191036 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2006-09-22 18:22 EST ------- http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-extras-list/2006-September/msg00624.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 22 23:04:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 19:04:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188477] Review Request: maildrop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609222304.k8MN4NU9008675@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: maildrop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188477 ------- Additional Comments From ndbecker2 at gmail.com 2006-09-22 19:04 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > This is a *very* old version of maildrop - 2.0.2 is current and is vastly > improved on the old 1.x series. > > However newer versions dependent on a courier-authlib package at both build and > runtime and no such package exists yet in Extras. > > Additionally, fam-devel no longer exists in Core (replace that with gamin-devel) > and you might want to swap gdbm for db (--with-db=db in configure) as I find the > latter a little more reliable. > > The spec definitely needs some work before it's ready for Extras (many of the > %defines are not needed or not desirable, "make install" is preferred of "make > install-strip" among others) > > On the upside, I've been packaging both this and maildrop for a while now (and > courier-imap, but the spec file is a disaster area hence why I've not submitted > it) If you want to try a more modern version I'm happy to put my courier-authlib > package for review and you can build off of that. > > You can also have a look at the spec if you like (it too is built off Sam's > distribution specfile but has been hacked around quite a bit since then) > > http://www.enlartenment.com/packages/fedora/5/SRPMS/courier-authlib-0.58-1.fc5.mf.src.rpm > http://www.enlartenment.com/packages/fedora/5/SRPMS/maildrop-2.0.2-1.fc5.mf.src.rpm Mike, are you going to pursue submitting this to fedora-extras? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 23 00:31:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 20:31:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206693] Review Request: KTechlab - Development and simulation of microcontrollers and electronic circuits In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609230031.k8N0VSfx012341@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: KTechlab - Development and simulation of microcontrollers and electronic circuits https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206693 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2006-09-22 20:31 EST ------- Updated: SPEC: http://chitlesh.funpic.de/rpm/ktechlab.spec SRPM: http://chitlesh.funpic.de/rpm/ktechlab-0.3-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 23 01:30:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 21:30:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207082] Review Request: perl-Feed-Find - Syndication feed auto-discovery In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609230130.k8N1UJl8014942@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Feed-Find - Syndication feed auto-discovery https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207082 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-09-22 21:30 EST ------- This fails to build for me: t/01-find....... # Failed test in t/01-find.t at line 13. # got: '0' # expected: '1' # Failed test in t/01-find.t at line 14. # got: undef # expected: 'http://stupidfool.org/perl/feeds/ok.xml' # Failed test in t/01-find.t at line 20. # got: '0' # expected: '1' # Failed test in t/01-find.t at line 21. # got: undef # expected: 'http://stupidfool.org/perl/feeds/ok.xml' # Looks like you failed 4 tests of 4. dubious Test returned status 4 (wstat 1024, 0x400) DIED. FAILED tests 1-4 Failed 4/4 tests, 0.00% okay Failed Test Stat Wstat Total Fail Failed List of Failed ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- t/01-find.t 4 1024 4 4 100.00% 1-4 Failed 1/2 test scripts, 50.00% okay. 4/5 subtests failed, 20.00% okay. I doubt this test will ever work in mock. I think you need "rm t/01-find.t" in %check (or in %prep if you want to avoid a complaint about a missing test) with suitable comments to indicate why it's being disabled. That done, things build OK. I'll assume that change is done for the purposes of this review. * source files match upstream: be4537f652d41243cbf98f5e937d16f3 Feed-Find-0.06.tar.gz * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * dist tag is present. * build root is correct. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. License text not included upstream. * latest version is being packaged. O BuildRequires are proper (BR: perl is unnecessary, and perl(LWP::UserAgent) is redundant). * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * package installs properly * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: perl(Feed::Find) = 0.06 perl-Feed-Find = 0.06-1.fc6 = perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8) perl(Class::ErrorHandler) perl(HTML::Parser) perl(LWP::UserAgent) perl(URI) perl(base) perl(constant) perl(strict) perl(vars) * %check is present and all tests pass: All tests successful. Files=1, Tests=1, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.04 cusr + 0.01 csys = 0.05 CPU) * package is not relocatable. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. APPROVED, provided the non-runnable test is removed so that things build in mock. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 23 02:19:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 22:19:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206816] Review Request: freedoom-freedm - Deathmatch levels for freedoom In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609230219.k8N2JiI9016919@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: freedoom-freedm - Deathmatch levels for freedoom https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206816 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 23 03:34:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 23:34:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207781] New: Review Request: libmatheval - parse and evaluate symbolic expressions Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207781 Summary: Review Request: libmatheval - parse and evaluate symbolic expressions Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: ed at eh3.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://mitgcm.org/eh3/fedora_misc/libmatheval.spec SRPM URL: http://mitgcm.org/eh3/fedora_misc/libmatheval-1.1.3-2.fc6.src.rpm Description: GNU libmatheval is a library (callable from C and Fortran) to parse and evaluate symbolic expressions input as text. It supports expressions in any number of variables of arbitrary names, decimal and symbolic constants, basic unary and binary operators, and elementary mathematical functions. In addition to parsing and evaluation, libmatheval can also compute symbolic derivatives and output expressions to strings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 23 03:55:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 23:55:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207782] New: Review Request: itpp - C++ library for math, signal/speech processing, and communications Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207782 Summary: Review Request: itpp - C++ library for math, signal/speech processing, and communications Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: ed at eh3.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://mitgcm.org/eh3/fedora_misc/itpp.spec SRPM URL: http://mitgcm.org/eh3/fedora_misc/itpp-3.10.5-1.fc5.src.rpm Description: IT++ is a C++ library of mathematical, signal processing, speech processing, and communications classes and functions. The kernel of the IT++ library is built upon templated vector and matrix classes with many lots of functions for their manipulation. Such a kernel makes IT++ similar to Octave. IT++ makes extensive use of existing open-source libraries (but not only) for increased functionality, speed and accuracy. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 23 04:04:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006 00:04:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206839] Review Request: TurboKid - Python template plugin that supports Kid templates In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609230404.k8N44BE5023431@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: TurboKid - Python template plugin that supports Kid templates https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206839 ------- Additional Comments From toshio at tiki-lounge.com 2006-09-23 00:04 EST ------- MD5Sums: 59c0ee439ad02613965017e38b6796d0 TurboKid-0.9.8-2.src.rpm 35997fd4208f40279461b6a823a4e03f TurboKid-0.9.8-py2.4.egg f7a9046bb1d065aa13fad23ba6363018 TurboKid.spec Blockers: * As we discussed on IRC the naming is better as python-turbogears. * Upstream seems to have changed the download URL to: http://files.turbogears.org/eggs/TurboKid-0.9.8-py2.4.egg * Package needs to own the %{python_sitelib}/turbokid directory. Removing the (*) from the relevant line in %files should take care of that. * We should try to place the EGG-INFO directory into the site-packages directory so that setuptools realizes we have it installed. From our IRC conversation it sounds like you have a better idea of how this should look than I do :-) Good: * Package licensed under a MIT style license. * The spec file is legible, American English. * Source matches upstream. * Package compiles and builds as noarch on an x86_64. * All BuildRequires are satisfied. * No locales. * No shared libraries, static libraries, headers, or pkgconfig files. * Not relocatable. * No duplicate files. * Permissions properly set. * Proper %clean section. * Macros are properly used. * No large docs. Docs do not affect runtime. * No GUI application. * Does not own directories already owned. * Builds in mock * rpmlint -i TurboKid-0.9.8-2.noarch.rpm W: TurboKid no-documentation Hopefully upstream will include more documentation in the future. Not Yet checked: * Tested that it works. I have to build a new TurboGears package to test this with. If you fix the blockers, I'll get TurboGears built so I can test and we can get this approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 23 04:16:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006 00:16:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207781] Review Request: libmatheval - parse and evaluate symbolic expressions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609230416.k8N4GqhW023833@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libmatheval - parse and evaluate symbolic expressions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207781 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2006-09-23 00:16 EST ------- MUST FIX: * Please explain in detail, why you want to include a static lib or disable it (--disable-static). Feel strongly encouraged to do the latter. CONSIDER: * The package contains a testsuite. Consider activating it by adding %check make check ||: * The package's configuration supports --disable-dependency-tracking. Adding it somewhat reduces the time required to build (but this package is small, so this doesn't really matter). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 23 04:35:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006 00:35:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207781] Review Request: libmatheval - parse and evaluate symbolic expressions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609230435.k8N4ZQLt024246@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libmatheval - parse and evaluate symbolic expressions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207781 ------- Additional Comments From ed at eh3.com 2006-09-23 00:35 EST ------- Hi Ralf, thanks for the quick comments. I dropped the static lib, added the check, and heres a re-spin: http://mitgcm.org/eh3/fedora_misc/libmatheval-1.1.3-3.src.rpm And I'm not going to bother with the dependency thing--it already builds very quickly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 23 04:35:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006 00:35:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206816] Review Request: freedoom-freedm - Deathmatch levels for freedoom In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609230435.k8N4Zfgg024273@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: freedoom-freedm - Deathmatch levels for freedoom https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206816 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-09-23 00:35 EST ------- The source URL is failing for me; it's probably some sourceforge breakage. I specified a mirror (superb-west.dl.sourceforge.net) and it came through fine. * source files match upstream: 340a3e884729c22f45ff73353e2cc67a freedoom-freedm-0.5.zip * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * dist tag is present. * build root is correct. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. License text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * package installs properly * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: freedoom-freedm = 0.5-1.fc6 = freedoom prboom * package is not relocatable. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * game levels are acceptable content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * desktop file is properly installed. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 23 04:42:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006 00:42:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207313] Review Request: php-pear-PHP-Compat - Provides missing functionality for older versions of PHP In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609230442.k8N4g0ia024562@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-PHP-Compat - Provides missing functionality for older versions of PHP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207313 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 23 04:50:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006 00:50:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207612] Review Request: zidrav - Zorba's Incredible Data Repairer And Verifier In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609230450.k8N4obV3024826@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: zidrav - Zorba's Incredible Data Repairer And Verifier https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207612 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-09-23 00:50 EST ------- So I see an APPROVED up there, but this bug is still blocking FE-NEW and isn't assigned to anyone. Scott, did you intend to review and approve this? If so, you should assign it to yourself and change the blocker bug from FE-NEW to FE-ACCEPT. In the future, when you want to review a bug, assign it to yourself and change the blocker to FE-REVIEW so other potential reviewers will know that someone's working on it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 23 05:11:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006 01:11:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207141] Review Request: farsight - A audio/video conferencing framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609230511.k8N5BDYl025200@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: farsight - A audio/video conferencing framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207141 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |kevin at tummy.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-09-23 01:11 EST ------- OK - Package name OK - Spec file matches base package name. OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines. See below - License (GPL) See below - License field in spec matches See below - License file included in package OK - Spec in American English OK - Spec is legible. OK - Sources match upstream md5sum: 68daa710087201064680fd02c8a4951a farsight-0.1.8.tar.gz 68daa710087201064680fd02c8a4951a farsight-0.1.8.tar.gz.1 OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch. OK - BuildRequires correct OK - Spec has needed ldconfig in post and postun OK - Package owns all the directories it creates. OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files. OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. OK - Package has a correct %clean section. OK - Spec has consistant macro usage. OK - Package is code or permissible content. OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime. OK - Headers/static libs in -devel subpackage. OK - .pc files in -devel subpackage. OK - .so files in -devel subpackage. OK - -devel package Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} OK - .la files are removed. OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. OK - No rpmlint output. SHOULD Items: See below - Should include License or ask upstream to include it. OK - Should build in mock. (fc6 {i386|x86_64}) Issues: 1. Is the License LGPL or GPL? The spec says GPL, but the COPYING file is the LGPL, and all the source files refer to LGPL. 2. Are all the disables needed? Or could some of them be enabled if other packages were in extras? --disable-sequence-diagrams \ --disable-sofia-sip \ --disable-gnet \ --disable-msnwebcam \ --disable-yahoowebcam \ 3. rpmlint says: W: farsight-devel no-documentation which can be ignored. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 23 05:14:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006 01:14:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207782] Review Request: itpp - C++ library for math, signal/speech processing, and communications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609230514.k8N5EVq5025332@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: itpp - C++ library for math, signal/speech processing, and communications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207782 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2006-09-23 01:14 EST ------- Some initial comments: MUST FIX: * Please explain in detail, why you want to include a static lib or disable it (--disable-static). Feel strongly encouraged to do the latter. * /usr/bin/itpp-config is pretty much bugged and needs further treatment: At minimum, please remove all traces of /usr/include, /usr/lib and (!) -L/usr/lib/gcc* in return values. * Something is broken with the *-doc package: # rpm -qlp itpp-doc-3.10.5-1.i386.rpm /usr/share/doc/itpp-3.10.5 /usr/share/doc/itpp-3.10.5/AUTHORS /usr/share/doc/itpp-3.10.5/ChangeLog /usr/share/doc/itpp-3.10.5/INSTALL /usr/share/doc/itpp-3.10.5/NEWS /usr/share/doc/itpp-3.10.5/README /usr/share/doc/itpp-3.10.5/TODO I haven't tried to investigate, yet, but would guess on some issue related _docdir and/or doxygen. COULD FIX: * rpmlint complains: E: itpp-debuginfo script-without-shellbang /usr/src/debug/itpp-3.10.5/itpp/base/itpp_version.h [Header is executable. Not a real issue, can be ignored] CONSIDER: * --disable-dependency-tracking. This package is large, so it should have a measureable impact on building ;) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 23 05:16:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006 01:16:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207782] Review Request: itpp - C++ library for math, signal/speech processing, and communications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609230516.k8N5GXuP025400@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: itpp - C++ library for math, signal/speech processing, and communications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207782 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2006-09-23 01:16 EST ------- MUST FIX: * *-devel contains a *.pc => According to the Packaging Guidelines, *-devel MUST Require: pkgconfig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 23 05:48:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006 01:48:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207292] Review Request: ruby-racc - LALR(1) Parser Generator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609230548.k8N5m6NL026200@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-racc - LALR(1) Parser Generator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207292 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |kevin at tummy.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-09-23 01:48 EST ------- OK - Package name OK - Spec file matches base package name. OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines. OK - License (LGPL) OK - License field in spec matches OK - License file included in package OK - Spec in American English OK - Spec is legible. OK - Sources match upstream md5sum: c23ee98abe79f051243adf04d4a82900 racc-1.4.5-all.tar.gz c23ee98abe79f051243adf04d4a82900 racc-1.4.5-all.tar.gz.1 OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch. OK - BuildRequires correct OK - Package owns all the directories it creates. OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files. See below - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. OK - Package has a correct %clean section. OK - Spec has consistant macro usage. OK - Package is code or permissible content. OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime. OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. OK - No rpmlint output. SHOULD Items: OK - Should include License or ask upstream to include it. OK - Should build in mock. (fc6 {i386|x86_64}) Issues: 1. Minor issue: Might change: %defattr(-,root,root) to %defattr(-,root,root,-) Otherwise it looks good, so this package is APPROVED. Don't forget to close this bug as NEXTRELEASE once it's been imported and built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 23 06:14:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006 02:14:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206266] Review Request: transmission - lightweight GTK+ BitTorrent client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609230614.k8N6ExQq027115@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: transmission - lightweight GTK+ BitTorrent client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206266 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |kevin at tummy.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-09-23 02:14 EST ------- OK - Spec file matches base package name. OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines. OK - License (MIT) OK - License field in spec matches OK - License file included in package OK - Spec in American English OK - Spec is legible. OK - Sources match upstream md5sum: 1156a88c77ab71782b9261881ea13811 Transmission-0.6.1.tar.gz 1156a88c77ab71782b9261881ea13811 Transmission-0.6.1.tar.gz.1 OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch. OK - BuildRequires correct OK - Spec handles locales/find_lang See below - Spec has needed ldconfig in post and postun OK - Package owns all the directories it creates. OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files. OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. OK - Package has a correct %clean section. OK - Spec has consistant macro usage. OK - Package is code or permissible content. OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime. OK - Package is a GUI app and has a .desktop file OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. OK - No rpmlint output. SHOULD Items: OK - Should include License or ask upstream to include it. OK - Should build in mock. Issues: 1. You have: Requires(post): /sbin/ldconfig Requires(postun): /sbin/ldconfig But there are no libraries in this package, and you don't call ldconfig in post/postun. Should remove those? 2. Your desktop-file-install and update-desktop-database calls don't seem to quite match the guidelines on: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets and http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#desktop 3. You shouldn't use %makeinstall if you can avoid it. See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head- fcaf3e6fcbd51194a5d0dbcfbdd2fcb7791dd002 Can you use make DESTDIR=%{buildroot} install or make DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT install? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 23 06:17:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006 02:17:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206839] Review Request: TurboKid - Python template plugin that supports Kid templates In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609230617.k8N6HCJk027202@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: TurboKid - Python template plugin that supports Kid templates https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206839 ------- Additional Comments From lmacken at redhat.com 2006-09-23 02:17 EST ------- http://people.redhat.com/lmacken/RPMS/python-turbokid-0.9.8-3.src.rpm http://people.redhat.com/lmacken/SPECS/python-turbokid.spec * Sat Sep 23 2006 Luke Macken - 0.9.8-3 - Rename to python-turbokid - Own %%{python_sitelib}/turbokid directory - Install the EGG-INFO directory -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 23 06:51:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006 02:51:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206816] Review Request: freedoom-freedm - Deathmatch levels for freedoom In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609230651.k8N6pOsC028106@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: freedoom-freedm - Deathmatch levels for freedoom https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206816 ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2006-09-23 02:51 EST ------- I also tend to have problems downloading from sourceforge via curl or wget, using various forms of the download URLs. I haven't seen a perfect solution to that problem yet. Imported and built. Thanks for the review! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 23 09:14:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006 05:14:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187317] Review Request: mindi In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609230914.k8N9EEaZ003784@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mindi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187317 ------- Additional Comments From bruno.cornec at hp.com 2006-09-23 05:14 EST ------- I have added an ExcludeArch entry in the spec file for ppc. mindi creates a boot environement which is architecture dependant and for now only i386, x86_64 and ia64 are supported. Upstream provides busybox .config file to allow people to rebuild busybox if needed. What is fedora habits here ? Shoud I provide a mindi-busybox package in addition ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 23 09:37:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006 05:37:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207761] Review Request: xpdf - A PDF file viewer for the X Window System In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609230937.k8N9b9FT004815@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xpdf - A PDF file viewer for the X Window System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207761 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pertusus at free.fr ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-09-23 05:36 EST ------- * I haven't tested, but it seems to me that the configure.in patch and autoconf call could be replaced by --without-Xp-library * Why isn't t1lib used? * There are some rpmlint errors/warning, most of them should be sorted out easily: E: xpdf tag-not-utf8 %changelog E: xpdf non-utf8-spec-file xpdf.spec W: xpdf mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs E: xpdf tag-not-utf8 %changelog E: xpdf obsolete-not-provided xpdf-chinese-simplified E: xpdf obsolete-not-provided xpdf-chinese-traditional E: xpdf obsolete-not-provided xpdf-korean E: xpdf obsolete-not-provided xpdf-japanese W: xpdf-utils summary-ended-with-dot Command line utilities for converting PDF files. E: xpdf-utils tag-not-utf8 %changelog E: xpdf-debuginfo tag-not-utf8 %changelog * It seems to me that the .png icon should better be in /usr/share/icons/hicolor/48x48/apps/ with the appropriate calls to the gtk cache snippet. * The calls to update-desktop-database are missing although there is a mimetype entry. * The desktop-file-install vendor should be fedora. * It seems to me that it should be xpdf-utils that requires poppler-utils. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 23 10:36:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006 06:36:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 173459] Review Request: initng In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609231036.k8NAa7YP008819@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 ------- Additional Comments From enrico.scholz at informatik.tu-chemnitz.de 2006-09-23 06:36 EST ------- forget the initng-ifiles issues; they were caused by me by building against an old initng-devel package. Hence, 'initng-ifiles' are APPROVED and can be committed when 'initng' is ready. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 23 10:44:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006 06:44:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207793] New: Review Request: flite - Small, fast speech synthesis engine (text-to-speech) Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207793 Summary: Review Request: flite - Small, fast speech synthesis engine (text-to-speech) Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: faucamp at csir.co.za QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://dialogpalette.sourceforge.net/extras/fedora/flite.spec SRPM URL: http://dialogpalette.sourceforge.net/extras/fedora/flite-1.3-1.src.rpm Description: Flite (festival-lite) is a small, fast run-time speech synthesis engine developed at CMU and primarily designed for small embedded machines and/or large servers. Flite is designed as an alternative synthesis engine to Festival for voices built using the FestVox suite of voice building tools. This is my first package, and I am looking for a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 23 10:51:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006 06:51:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207793] Review Request: flite - Small, fast speech synthesis engine (text-to-speech) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609231051.k8NAptTQ009992@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: flite - Small, fast speech synthesis engine (text-to-speech) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207793 faucamp at csir.co.za changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 23 11:09:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006 07:09:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207795] New: Review Request: perl-Perl-Critic - Critique Perl source code for best-practices Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207795 Summary: Review Request: perl-Perl-Critic - Critique Perl source code for best-practices Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jpo at di.uminho.pt QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: ftp://perl.di.uminho.pt/pub/fedora/perl-Perl-Critic.spec SRPM URL: ftp://perl.di.uminho.pt/pub/fedora/perl-Perl-Critic-0.2-1.src.rpm Description: Perl::Critic is an extensible framework for creating and applying coding standards to Perl source code. Essentially, it is a static source code analysis engine. Perl::Critic is distributed with a number of Perl::Critic::Policy modules that attempt to enforce various coding guidelines. Most Policy modules are based on Damian Conway's book Perl Best Practices. However, Perl::Critic is not limited to PBP and will even support Policies that contradict Conway. You can enable, disable, and customize those Polices through the Perl::Critic interface. You can also create new Policy modules that suit your own tastes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 23 11:17:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006 07:17:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207796] New: Review Request: eventlog - Syslog-ng v2 support library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207796 Summary: Review Request: eventlog - Syslog-ng v2 support library Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jpo at di.uminho.pt QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: ftp://perl.di.uminho.pt/pub/fedora/eventlog.spec SRPM URL: ftp://perl.di.uminho.pt/pub/fedora/eventlog-0.2.5-1.src.rpm Description: The EventLog library aims to be a replacement of the simple syslog() API provided on UNIX systems. The major difference between EventLog and syslog is that EventLog tries to add structure to messages. EventLog provides an interface to build, format and output an event record. The exact format and output method can be customized by the administrator via a configuration file. Notes: * This package is a syslog-ng v2 build requirement (static library) A syslog-ng v2 test srpm is available at the above download directory -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 23 11:35:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006 07:35:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 173459] Review Request: initng In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609231135.k8NBZ9tf013126@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 ------- Additional Comments From enrico.scholz at informatik.tu-chemnitz.de 2006-09-23 07:35 EST ------- another issue: initng does not work when SELinux is disabled. Workaround is, to remove the libselinux.so plugin. Solution would be, to place some is_selinux_enabled(3) calls into the module but due to the broken SELinux kernel API, I am not sure how to do it correctly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 23 12:14:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006 08:14:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207798] New: Review Request: perl-Test-File - Test file attributes Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207798 Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-File - Test file attributes Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jpo at di.uminho.pt QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: ftp://perl.di.uminho.pt/pub/fedora/perl-Test-File.spec SRPM URL: ftp://perl.di.uminho.pt/pub/fedora/perl-Test-File-1.16-1.src.rpm Description: This modules provides a collection of test utilities for file attributes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 23 12:24:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006 08:24:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187317] Review Request: mindi In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609231224.k8NCOi7o015270@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mindi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187317 ------- Additional Comments From dennis at ausil.us 2006-09-23 08:24 EST ------- you can not provide a pre built binary. Why can you not use the Fedora provided busybox? and add support for ppc? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 23 12:31:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006 08:31:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206842] Review Request: seq24 - Real-time MIDI sequencer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609231231.k8NCVjDV015579@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: seq24 - Real-time MIDI sequencer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206842 gemi at bluewin.ch changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |gemi at bluewin.ch ------- Additional Comments From gemi at bluewin.ch 2006-09-23 08:31 EST ------- * Also include seq24usr.example and TODO with the docs * Modify the description, so that it is not in the first person * Either use $RPM_BUILD_ROOT or %{buildroot}, but not both. I prefer $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 23 12:33:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006 08:33:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206693] Review Request: KTechlab - Development and simulation of microcontrollers and electronic circuits In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609231233.k8NCXuZs015666@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: KTechlab - Development and simulation of microcontrollers and electronic circuits https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206693 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-09-23 08:33 EST ------- Okay!!! This package (ktechlab) is APPROVED by me. P.S. again I would appreciate it if you would review my request (bug 206487 ). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 23 12:34:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006 08:34:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 173459] Review Request: initng In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609231234.k8NCYxQs015734@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 ------- Additional Comments From che666 at gmail.com 2006-09-23 08:34 EST ------- #332 known problem. have reported it various times in this thread. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 23 12:45:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006 08:45:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187326] Review Request: smokeping - Network latency grapher In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609231245.k8NCjb4H016054@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: smokeping - Network latency grapher https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187326 ------- Additional Comments From andreas at bawue.net 2006-09-23 08:45 EST ------- Yeah. Sorry for the delay. I spent the last weeks in ireland with no ip access there. Right now I'm at akademy, the kde conference in dublin. I guess, I'll manage to fix the package up here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 23 13:15:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006 09:15:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207141] Review Request: farsight - A audio/video conferencing framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609231315.k8NDF424017811@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: farsight - A audio/video conferencing framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207141 ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at ameritech.net 2006-09-23 09:14 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1)> > Issues: > > 1. Is the License LGPL or GPL? The spec says GPL, but the COPYING file > is the LGPL, and all the source files refer to LGPL. Package should be LGPL. > 2. Are all the disables needed? Or could some of them be enabled > if other packages were in extras? > --disable-sequence-diagrams \ > --disable-sofia-sip \ > --disable-gnet \ > --disable-msnwebcam \ > --disable-yahoowebcam \ The disables are currently needed, since most of the other plugins are currently experimental, or in need of a port to their respective new API. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 23 13:31:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006 09:31:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 173459] Review Request: initng In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609231331.k8NDV1Bb018445@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 ------- Additional Comments From enrico.scholz at informatik.tu-chemnitz.de 2006-09-23 09:31 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=137000) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=137000&action=view) check whether selinux is available before trying to use it Should fix the issues on systems not having SELinux. Please try it on SELinux enabled systems. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 23 13:53:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006 09:53:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207802] New: Review Request: libpaper - Library and tools for handling papersize Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207802 Summary: Review Request: libpaper - Library and tools for handling papersize Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: tcallawa at redhat.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/libpaper.spec SRPM URL: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/libpaper-1.1.20-1.fc6.src.rpm Description: The paper library and accompanying files are intended to provide a simple way for applications to take actions based on a system- or user-specified paper size. This release is quite minimal, its purpose being to provide really basic functions (obtaining the system paper name and getting the height and width of a given kind of paper) that applications can immediately integrate. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 23 14:05:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006 10:05:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207676] Review Request: SDL_pango - Rendering of internationalized text for SDL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609231405.k8NE53Dg019588@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: SDL_pango - Rendering of internationalized text for SDL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207676 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-09-23 10:05 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=137001) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=137001&action=view) patch for SDL_Pango-0.1.2 to suppress warning This patch should suppress warning. Well, * %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) is preferred. * I recommend to explicitly remove *.a and *.la files in %install stage, not to use %exclude method. * Don't use %makeinstall http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 23 14:10:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006 10:10:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207802] Review Request: libpaper - Library and tools for handling papersize In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609231410.k8NEAZNP019745@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libpaper - Library and tools for handling papersize https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207802 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |207761 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 23 14:10:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006 10:10:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207761] Review Request: xpdf - A PDF file viewer for the X Window System In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609231410.k8NEAYGT019731@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xpdf - A PDF file viewer for the X Window System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207761 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |207802 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 23 14:11:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006 10:11:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203212] Review Request: libgalago-gtk In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609231411.k8NEBSvv019784@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgalago-gtk https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203212 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-09-23 10:11 EST ------- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 23 14:13:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006 10:13:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207761] Review Request: xpdf - A PDF file viewer for the X Window System In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609231413.k8NED9AP019851@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xpdf - A PDF file viewer for the X Window System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207761 ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2006-09-23 10:12 EST ------- Indeed, every one of these points is valid, and I have adjusted the package accordingly. rpmlint is now clean. I even noticed that it was looking for libpaper, something not in Fedora, so I packaged that up and have it up for review at 207802. (It's a really easy review, should be no trouble to knock out). New SRPM: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/xpdf-3.01-18.fc6.src.rpm New SPEC: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/xpdf.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 23 14:13:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006 10:13:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206693] Review Request: KTechlab - Development and simulation of microcontrollers and electronic circuits In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609231413.k8NEDiuj019889@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: KTechlab - Development and simulation of microcontrollers and electronic circuits https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206693 ------- Additional Comments From alain.portal at free.fr 2006-09-23 10:13 EST ------- I'm not agree with the removal of Requires gputils gpsim. Perhaps Requires gpsim isn't needed because rpm complain about dependencies: [root at lns-bzn-37-82-253-50-64 i386]# LANG=C rpm -ivh ktechlab-0.3-2.i386.rpm error: Failed dependencies: libgpsim.so.0 is needed by ktechlab-0.3-2.i386 libgpsim_eXdbm.so.0 is needed by ktechlab-0.3-2.i386 libgpsimcli.so.0 is needed by ktechlab-0.3-2.i386 Of course, "ktechlab examples.circuit" work without gputils, because the circuit is an analog circuit, there is no PIC in it. But take the second example, "code_entry.circuit". Ktechlab open an error dialog box: "Assembly failed. Please check you have gputils installed" Ktechlab requires gputils for PIC simulation. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 23 14:28:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006 10:28:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207802] Review Request: libpaper - Library and tools for handling papersize In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609231428.k8NESSge020305@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libpaper - Library and tools for handling papersize https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207802 dan at danny.cz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |dan at danny.cz OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 23 14:31:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006 10:31:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206693] Review Request: KTechlab - Development and simulation of microcontrollers and electronic circuits In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609231431.k8NEVNH0020413@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: KTechlab - Development and simulation of microcontrollers and electronic circuits https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206693 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-09-23 10:31 EST ------- (In reply to comment #14) > I'm not agree with the removal of Requires gputils gpsim. > > Ktechlab requires gputils for PIC simulation. > Well, if it is common that Ktechlab is used for PIC simulation , in which case gputils is required generally, making Ktechlab require gputils is reasonable. I leave the judgment of whether Ktechlab should require gputils to Chitlesh. Anyway this package is approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 23 14:47:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006 10:47:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207313] Review Request: php-pear-PHP-Compat - Provides missing functionality for older versions of PHP In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609231447.k8NEl1lv021120@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-PHP-Compat - Provides missing functionality for older versions of PHP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207313 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-09-23 10:46 EST ------- * source files match upstream: 4d73c451f4f3a8f9a0516bd26af7f652 PHP_Compat-1.5.0.tgz * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * dist tag is present. * build root is correct. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. License text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * package installs properly * rpmlint is silent (except for the usual bogus "dangerous-command" warning). * final provides and requires are sane: php-pear(PHP_Compat) = 1.5.0 php-pear-PHP-Compat = 1.5.0-1.fc6 = /bin/sh /usr/bin/pear php-pear(PEAR) * %check is present, but tests the packaging, not the package. There are tests for the package, but as with all PEAR modules it's not really possible to run them at build time. * package is not relocatable. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 23 14:49:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006 10:49:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207802] Review Request: libpaper - Library and tools for handling papersize In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609231449.k8NEn2P7021209@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libpaper - Library and tools for handling papersize https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207802 ------- Additional Comments From dan at danny.cz 2006-09-23 10:49 EST ------- rpmlint from Rawhide gives W: libpaper mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (on the src.rpm) Could the static library be excluded? When running paperconf, it could not find /etc/papersize. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 23 14:49:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006 10:49:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187430] Review Request: elektra In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609231449.k8NEnHgl021227@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: elektra https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187430 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO_REPORTER |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(avi at unix.sh) ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-09-23 10:49 EST ------- This has been in NEEDINFO for nearly two months now. I will close this bug in one week if there is no further response. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 23 14:50:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006 10:50:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 185535] Review Request: lurker In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609231450.k8NEo7wV021280@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lurker https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=185535 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO_REPORTER |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(jdennis at redhat.com | |) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 23 14:51:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006 10:51:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193380] Review Request: hardinfo In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609231451.k8NEpxif021435@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hardinfo https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193380 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO_REPORTER |NEEDINFO AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |nobody at fedoraproject.org Flag| |needinfo?(splinux25 at gmail.co | |m) ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-09-23 10:51 EST ------- This bug has been in the NEEDINFO state for six weeks now. I will close it in one week if there is no further response. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 23 14:53:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006 10:53:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203212] Review Request: libgalago-gtk In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609231453.k8NEr0bd021491@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgalago-gtk https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203212 ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at ameritech.net 2006-09-23 10:52 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > W: libgalago-gtk mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (in src.rpm) > W: libgalago-gtk-devel no-documentation > > - Remove tabs from spec file to unify spacing. > - The latter rpmlibt conmplaint can be ignored, I think. In my opinion both of these warnings can be ignored. > > * Timestamps > - Use: > make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT INSTALL="install -c -p" > to keep the timestamps of header files in -devel package. I also think that this can be ignored, but I would like to hear from other FE contributors to get their opinion on this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 23 14:54:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006 10:54:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207798] Review Request: perl-Test-File - Test file attributes In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609231454.k8NEsjES021584@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-File - Test file attributes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207798 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 23 15:03:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006 11:03:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207798] Review Request: perl-Test-File - Test file attributes In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609231503.k8NF3dNb021840@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-File - Test file attributes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207798 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-09-23 11:03 EST ------- * source files match upstream: 8997fa36af7b22d81c221d5325b46930 Test-File-1.16.tar.gz * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * dist tag is present. * build root is correct. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. License text not included upstream. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper (BR: perl(Test::Builder) and perl(Test::Builder::Tester) are unnecessary as they are part of the base Perl package.) * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * package installs properly * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: perl(Test::File) = 1.16 perl-Test-File = 1.16-1.fc6 = perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8) perl(File::Spec) perl(Test::Builder) perl(base) perl(strict) perl(vars) * %check is present and all tests pass: All tests successful, 5 subtests skipped. Files=9, Tests=63, 6 wallclock secs ( 5.35 cusr + 0.35 csys = 5.70 CPU) The five skipped subtests are expected. * package is not relocatable. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 23 15:03:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006 11:03:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207802] Review Request: libpaper - Library and tools for handling papersize In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609231503.k8NF3tpK021879@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libpaper - Library and tools for handling papersize https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207802 ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2006-09-23 11:03 EST ------- /etc/papersize is (re)generated with /usr/sbin/paperconfig, but the package should own it. I set letter as the default. New SRPM: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/libpaper-1.1.20-2.fc6.src.rpm New SPEC: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/libpaper.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 23 15:06:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006 11:06:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207795] Review Request: perl-Perl-Critic - Critique Perl source code for best-practices In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609231506.k8NF6fHq021962@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Perl-Critic - Critique Perl source code for best-practices https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207795 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 23 15:09:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006 11:09:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203212] Review Request: libgalago-gtk In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609231509.k8NF9RIS022061@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgalago-gtk https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203212 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-09-23 11:09 EST ------- (In reply to comment #6) > > * Timestamps > > - Use: > > make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT INSTALL="install -c -p" > > to keep the timestamps of header files in -devel package. > > I also think that this can be ignored, but I would like to hear from other FE > contributors to get their opinion on this. > I usually recommend to keep timestamp if possible, especially when the package contains a lot of files which were originally included in the source and not created during compilation stage. Keeping timestamp make it clearer if packager (like you) made some fixes or changes against the files, IMO. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 23 15:18:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006 11:18:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207795] Review Request: perl-Perl-Critic - Critique Perl source code for best-practices In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609231518.k8NFIQN4022438@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Perl-Critic - Critique Perl source code for best-practices https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207795 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-09-23 11:18 EST ------- That sure is a large number of submodules with really long names.... * source files match upstream: a31ab7c92cdb0501c1a3e298495f61c5 Perl-Critic-0.2.tar.gz * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * dist tag is present. * build root is correct. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. License text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * package installs properly * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: perl(Perl::Critic) = 0.20 perl(Perl::Critic::Config) = 0.20 perl(Perl::Critic::Document) = 0.20 perl(Perl::Critic::Policy) = 0.20 perl(Perl::Critic::Policy::BuiltinFunctions::ProhibitLvalueSubstr) = 0.20 perl(Perl::Critic::Policy::BuiltinFunctions::ProhibitSleepViaSelect) = 0.20 perl(Perl::Critic::Policy::BuiltinFunctions::ProhibitStringyEval) = 0.20 perl(Perl::Critic::Policy::BuiltinFunctions::ProhibitStringySplit) = 0.20 perl(Perl::Critic::Policy::BuiltinFunctions::ProhibitUniversalCan) = 0.20 perl(Perl::Critic::Policy::BuiltinFunctions::ProhibitUniversalIsa) = 0.20 perl(Perl::Critic::Policy::BuiltinFunctions::RequireBlockGrep) = 0.20 perl(Perl::Critic::Policy::BuiltinFunctions::RequireBlockMap) = 0.20 perl(Perl::Critic::Policy::BuiltinFunctions::RequireGlobFunction) = 0.20 perl(Perl::Critic::Policy::BuiltinFunctions::RequireSimpleSortBlock) = 0.20 perl(Perl::Critic::Policy::ClassHierarchies::ProhibitAutoloading) = 0.20 perl(Perl::Critic::Policy::ClassHierarchies::ProhibitExplicitISA) = 0.20 perl(Perl::Critic::Policy::ClassHierarchies::ProhibitOneArgBless) = 0.20 perl(Perl::Critic::Policy::CodeLayout::ProhibitHardTabs) = 0.20 perl(Perl::Critic::Policy::CodeLayout::ProhibitParensWithBuiltins) = 0.20 perl(Perl::Critic::Policy::CodeLayout::ProhibitQuotedWordLists) = 0.20 perl(Perl::Critic::Policy::CodeLayout::RequireTidyCode) = 0.20 perl(Perl::Critic::Policy::CodeLayout::RequireTrailingCommas) = 0.20 perl(Perl::Critic::Policy::ControlStructures::ProhibitCStyleForLoops) = 0.20 perl(Perl::Critic::Policy::ControlStructures::ProhibitCascadingIfElse) = 0.20 perl(Perl::Critic::Policy::ControlStructures::ProhibitDeepNests) = 0.20 perl(Perl::Critic::Policy::ControlStructures::ProhibitPostfixControls) = 0.20 perl(Perl::Critic::Policy::ControlStructures::ProhibitUnlessBlocks) = 0.20 perl(Perl::Critic::Policy::ControlStructures::ProhibitUnreachableCode) = 0.20 perl(Perl::Critic::Policy::ControlStructures::ProhibitUntilBlocks) = 0.20 perl(Perl::Critic::Policy::Documentation::RequirePodAtEnd) = 0.20 perl(Perl::Critic::Policy::Documentation::RequirePodSections) = 0.20 perl(Perl::Critic::Policy::ErrorHandling::RequireCarping) = 0.20 perl(Perl::Critic::Policy::InputOutput::ProhibitBacktickOperators) = 0.20 perl(Perl::Critic::Policy::InputOutput::ProhibitBarewordFileHandles) = 0.20 perl(Perl::Critic::Policy::InputOutput::ProhibitInteractiveTest) = 0.20 perl(Perl::Critic::Policy::InputOutput::ProhibitOneArgSelect) = 0.20 perl(Perl::Critic::Policy::InputOutput::ProhibitReadlineInForLoop) = 0.20 perl(Perl::Critic::Policy::InputOutput::ProhibitTwoArgOpen) = 0.20 perl(Perl::Critic::Policy::InputOutput::RequireBracedFileHandleWithPrint) = 0.20 perl(Perl::Critic::Policy::Miscellanea::ProhibitFormats) = 0.20 perl(Perl::Critic::Policy::Miscellanea::ProhibitTies) = 0.20 perl(Perl::Critic::Policy::Miscellanea::RequireRcsKeywords) = 0.20 perl(Perl::Critic::Policy::Modules::ProhibitAutomaticExportation) = 0.20 perl(Perl::Critic::Policy::Modules::ProhibitEvilModules) = 0.20 perl(Perl::Critic::Policy::Modules::ProhibitMultiplePackages) = 0.20 perl(Perl::Critic::Policy::Modules::RequireBarewordIncludes) = 0.20 perl(Perl::Critic::Policy::Modules::RequireEndWithOne) = 0.20 perl(Perl::Critic::Policy::Modules::RequireExplicitPackage) = 0.20 perl(Perl::Critic::Policy::Modules::RequireVersionVar) = 0.20 perl(Perl::Critic::Policy::NamingConventions::ProhibitAmbiguousNames) = 0.20 perl(Perl::Critic::Policy::NamingConventions::ProhibitMixedCaseSubs) = 0.20 perl(Perl::Critic::Policy::NamingConventions::ProhibitMixedCaseVars) = 0.20 perl(Perl::Critic::Policy::References::ProhibitDoubleSigils) = 0.20 perl(Perl::Critic::Policy::RegularExpressions::ProhibitCaptureWithoutTest) = 0.20 perl(Perl::Critic::Policy::RegularExpressions::RequireExtendedFormatting) = 0.20 perl(Perl::Critic::Policy::RegularExpressions::RequireLineBoundaryMatching) = 0.20 perl(Perl::Critic::Policy::Subroutines::ProhibitAmpersandSigils) = 0.20 perl(Perl::Critic::Policy::Subroutines::ProhibitBuiltinHomonyms) = 0.20 perl(Perl::Critic::Policy::Subroutines::ProhibitExcessComplexity) = 0.20 perl(Perl::Critic::Policy::Subroutines::ProhibitExplicitReturnUndef) = 0.20 perl(Perl::Critic::Policy::Subroutines::ProhibitSubroutinePrototypes) = 0.20 perl(Perl::Critic::Policy::Subroutines::ProtectPrivateSubs) = 0.20 perl(Perl::Critic::Policy::Subroutines::RequireFinalReturn) = 0.20 perl(Perl::Critic::Policy::TestingAndDebugging::ProhibitNoStrict) = 0.20 perl(Perl::Critic::Policy::TestingAndDebugging::ProhibitNoWarnings) = 0.20 perl(Perl::Critic::Policy::TestingAndDebugging::RequireUseStrict) = 0.20 perl(Perl::Critic::Policy::TestingAndDebugging::RequireUseWarnings) = 0.20 perl(Perl::Critic::Policy::ValuesAndExpressions::ProhibitConstantPragma) = 0.20 perl(Perl::Critic::Policy::ValuesAndExpressions::ProhibitEmptyQuotes) = 0.20 perl(Perl::Critic::Policy::ValuesAndExpressions::ProhibitEscapedCharacters) = 0.20 perl(Perl::Critic::Policy::ValuesAndExpressions::ProhibitInterpolationOfLiterals) = 0.20 perl(Perl::Critic::Policy::ValuesAndExpressions::ProhibitLeadingZeros) = 0.20 perl(Perl::Critic::Policy::ValuesAndExpressions::ProhibitMixedBooleanOperators) = 0.20 perl(Perl::Critic::Policy::ValuesAndExpressions::ProhibitNoisyQuotes) = 0.20 perl(Perl::Critic::Policy::ValuesAndExpressions::ProhibitVersionStrings) = 0.20 perl(Perl::Critic::Policy::ValuesAndExpressions::RequireInterpolationOfMetachars) = 0.20 perl(Perl::Critic::Policy::ValuesAndExpressions::RequireNumberSeparators) = 0.20 perl(Perl::Critic::Policy::ValuesAndExpressions::RequireQuotedHeredocTerminator) = 0.20 perl(Perl::Critic::Policy::ValuesAndExpressions::RequireUpperCaseHeredocTerminator) = 0.20 perl(Perl::Critic::Policy::Variables::ProhibitConditionalDeclarations) = 0.20 perl(Perl::Critic::Policy::Variables::ProhibitLocalVars) = 0.20 perl(Perl::Critic::Policy::Variables::ProhibitMatchVars) = 0.20 perl(Perl::Critic::Policy::Variables::ProhibitPackageVars) = 0.20 perl(Perl::Critic::Policy::Variables::ProhibitPunctuationVars) = 0.20 perl(Perl::Critic::Policy::Variables::ProtectPrivateVars) = 0.20 perl(Perl::Critic::Policy::Variables::RequireInitializationForLocalVars) = 0.20 perl(Perl::Critic::Policy::Variables::RequireLexicalLoopIterators) = 0.20 perl(Perl::Critic::Policy::Variables::RequireNegativeIndices) = 0.20 perl(Perl::Critic::TestUtils) = 0.20 perl(Perl::Critic::Utils) = 0.20 perl(Perl::Critic::Violation) = 0.20 perl-Perl-Critic = 0.2-1.fc6 = /usr/bin/perl perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8) perl(Carp) perl(Config::Tiny) perl(English) perl(File::Spec) perl(File::Spec::Unix) perl(Getopt::Long) perl(IO::String) perl(List::MoreUtils) perl(List::Util) perl(Module::Pluggable) perl(PPI) perl(PPI::Document) perl(Perl::Critic) perl(Perl::Critic::Config) perl(Perl::Critic::Document) perl(Perl::Critic::Utils) perl(Perl::Critic::Violation) perl(Perl::Tidy) perl(Pod::PlainText) perl(Pod::Usage) perl(Scalar::Util) perl(String::Format) perl(base) perl(overload) perl(strict) perl(warnings) * %check is present and all tests pass: All tests successful. Files=26, Tests=1588, 24 wallclock secs (23.14 cusr + 1.35 csys = 24.49 CPU) * package is not relocatable. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 23 15:42:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006 11:42:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203212] Review Request: libgalago-gtk In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609231542.k8NFg7um023290@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgalago-gtk https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203212 ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at ameritech.net 2006-09-23 11:42 EST ------- Spec URL: http://piedmont.homelinux.org/fedora/libgalago/libgalago-gtk.spec SRPM URL: http://piedmont.homelinux.org/fedora/libgalago/libgalago-gtk-0.5.0-2.src.rpm * Sat Sep 23 2006 Brian Pepple - 0.5.0-2 - Preserve timestamps of header files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 23 16:06:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006 12:06:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196669] Review Request: filesystem-i18n In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609231606.k8NG6dr1023953@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: filesystem-i18n https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196669 ------- Additional Comments From redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de 2006-09-23 12:06 EST ------- Any chance to get this into Fedora Core 6 or will it definately be a canditate for Fedora Extras 6 and reach Fedora Core >= 7? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 23 16:09:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006 12:09:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203212] Review Request: libgalago-gtk In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609231609.k8NG94hq024003@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgalago-gtk https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203212 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-09-23 12:09 EST ------- Okay. -------------------------------------------------------------- This package (libgalago-gtk) is APPROVED by me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 23 16:09:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006 12:09:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207802] Review Request: libpaper - Library and tools for handling papersize In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609231609.k8NG9V7Q024037@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libpaper - Library and tools for handling papersize https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207802 dan at danny.cz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From dan at danny.cz 2006-09-23 12:09 EST ------- Review: - no rpmlint output on any package - package name OK - spec file name OK, is in English and is legible - package meets the Packaging Guidelines - license OK (GPL) and is included - source matches upstream 7075f580606a84e63b7d6d9fa3124c31 libpaper_1.1.20.tar.gz 7075f580606a84e63b7d6d9fa3124c31 libpaper_1.1.20.tar.gz.1 - compiles and builds at least on i386 (devel) - BuildRequires are correct - contains no localized files - has shared lib with appropriate ldconfig calls - does not create any directory - no duplicates files, permissions are set properly, uses %defattr - has %clean section - consistent use of macros - contains code - no large docs, %doc is not required during runtime - devel subpackage required and present, contains header - no .la libtool archives - not a GUI application - it works APPROVED The static library can be taken out also with %configure --disable-static. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 23 16:12:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006 12:12:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207796] Review Request: eventlog - Syslog-ng v2 support library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609231612.k8NGCMVm024164@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eventlog - Syslog-ng v2 support library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207796 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-09-23 12:12 EST ------- This builds fine for me; rpmlint on the insatlled rpm says: W: eventlog-devel ldd-failed /usr/lib64/libevtlog.a which is sort of expected as ldd will just return "not a dynamic executable". This package pretty well fits the exception to the no-static-libs rule, being a dependency of a package that needs to be statically linked so that it can run early in the boot sequence. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 23 16:12:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006 12:12:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207676] Review Request: SDL_pango - Rendering of internationalized text for SDL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609231612.k8NGCMsq024176@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: SDL_pango - Rendering of internationalized text for SDL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207676 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 23 16:22:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006 12:22:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207805] New: Review Request: skey - one-time password crap Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207805 Summary: Review Request: skey - one-time password crap Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: dwmw2 at redhat.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://david.woodhou.se/skey/skey.spec SRPM URL: http://david.woodhou.se/skey/skey-0.2-8.src.rpm Description: The S/Key suite is the forerunner of OTP, the IETF One-Time Password system. S/Key uses the MD4 (MD5, in this version) algorithm to generate a list of nonsensical pass phrases using your password, an interation count, and a seed. $ rpmlint SRPMS/skey-0.2-8.src.rpm RPMS/ppc/skey-0.2-8.ppc.rpm RPMS/ppc/pam_skey-0.2-8.ppc.rpm RPMS/ppc/skey-sshhelper-0.2-8.ppc.rpm RPMS/ppc/skey-debuginfo-0.2-8.ppc.rpm W: skey no-url-tag W: skey no-url-tag E: skey setuid-binary /usr/sbin/skeyinit root 04755 E: skey non-standard-executable-perm /usr/sbin/skeyinit 04755 E: skey non-readable /etc/skeykeys 0600 E: skey zero-length /etc/skeykeys W: pam_skey no-url-tag W: skey-sshhelper no-url-tag W: skey-debuginfo no-url-tag No appropriate URL to give. skeyinit is intended to be setuid, and skeykeys is intended to be empty. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 23 16:27:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006 12:27:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207313] Review Request: php-pear-PHP-Compat - Provides missing functionality for older versions of PHP In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609231627.k8NGRofp025370@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-PHP-Compat - Provides missing functionality for older versions of PHP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207313 Fedora at FamilleCollet.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 23 16:32:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006 12:32:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187430] Review Request: elektra In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609231632.k8NGWxc7025755@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: elektra https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187430 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-09-23 12:32 EST ------- Most of the issues raised during the review have been fixed upstream in the new release (I believe so) except for the potential name clashes. So I think it shouldn't be closed for now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 23 16:35:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006 12:35:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207806] New: Review Request: evolution-bogofilter - A plugin for bogofilter support in evolution Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207806 Summary: Review Request: evolution-bogofilter - A plugin for bogofilter support in evolution Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: tcallawa at redhat.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/evolution-bogofilter.spec SRPM URL: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/evolution-bogofilter-0.2.0-1.fc6.src.rpm Description: This plugin implements junk filtering for the Evolution mailer, provided by the bogofilter utility. Bogofilter (http://www.bogofilter.org) is a fast and nimble mail filter using a so-called Bayesian technique to classify junk and non-junk email. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 23 16:38:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006 12:38:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207802] Review Request: libpaper - Library and tools for handling papersize In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609231638.k8NGcZIN026336@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libpaper - Library and tools for handling papersize https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207802 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2006-09-23 12:38 EST ------- Thanks for the fast review, built in FC-5 and devel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 23 16:38:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006 12:38:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207761] Review Request: xpdf - A PDF file viewer for the X Window System In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609231638.k8NGckHm026385@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xpdf - A PDF file viewer for the X Window System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207761 Bug 207761 depends on bug 207802, which changed state. Bug 207802 Summary: Review Request: libpaper - Library and tools for handling papersize https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207802 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |RAWHIDE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 23 16:40:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006 12:40:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206816] Review Request: freedoom-freedm - Deathmatch levels for freedoom In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609231640.k8NGePoO026550@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: freedoom-freedm - Deathmatch levels for freedoom https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206816 wart at kobold.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 23 16:56:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006 12:56:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206222] Review Request: manaworld-music - music for the manaworld game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609231656.k8NGuWA7027676@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: manaworld-music - music for the manaworld game Alias: manaworld-music https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206222 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2006-09-23 12:56 EST ------- - rpmlint output clean - package named according to package naming guidelines - spec file name matches package %{name} - package meets packaging guidelines - package is licensed with open source compatible license - license matches actual license - license is included in %doc - spec file written in American english - spec file is legible - package successfully builds on x86_64 FC5 - package does not use locales - package does not contain shared library files - package is not relocatable - package owns all directories it creates - no duplicates in %files - permissions on files set properly - package contains proper %clean section - macro usage is consistent - package contains permissible content - package does not contain large documentation - files in %doc do not affect runtime - no header files or static libraries present - no pkgconfig files present - no library files with suffix present - no devel subpackage required - no .la files present - not a GUI app needing a .desktop file - package does not own files or directories owned by other packages -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 23 16:57:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006 12:57:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206222] Review Request: manaworld-music - music for the manaworld game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609231657.k8NGvHMI027753@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: manaworld-music - music for the manaworld game Alias: manaworld-music https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206222 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 23 17:00:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006 13:00:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 185423] Review Request: php-pear-PEAR-Command-Packaging: make-rpm-spec command for PEAR In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609231700.k8NH02dr027870@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-PEAR-Command-Packaging: make-rpm-spec command for PEAR Alias: php-pear-PCP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=185423 ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2006-09-23 13:00 EST ------- Why hasn't this package been imported and built? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 23 17:15:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006 13:15:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187430] Review Request: elektra In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609231715.k8NHFGNr028343@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: elektra https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187430 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-09-23 13:14 EST ------- The lack of response by the package submitter is the problem. Nothing upstream does makes any difference as long as the person who submitted the package doesn't respond to comments here. The last message from the submitter was in early June. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 23 17:16:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006 13:16:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196669] Review Request: filesystem-i18n In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609231716.k8NHGfR7028414@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: filesystem-i18n https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196669 ------- Additional Comments From redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de 2006-09-23 13:16 EST ------- Rex, regarding comment #8 - the following directories are unowned when looking around on a normal Fedora installation at my system, which is a very good reason to carry all man directories with filesystem-i18n, too. Guess the exactly number of directories depends on the locale selected during setup. /usr/share/man/fr/man3 /usr/share/man/hu/man{1,8} /usr/share/man/id/man8 /usr/share/man/it/man3 /usr/share/man/pl/man7 /usr/share/man/pt_BR /usr/share/man/pt_BR/man{1,5} /usr/share/man/ru/man{1,3,5,8} /usr/share/man/ru/man3 /usr/share/man/sk/man8 /usr/share/man/tr/man{1,5,8} /usr/share/man/zh_CN/man{1,8} /usr/share/man/zh_TW/man{1,8} -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 23 17:17:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006 13:17:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 195683] Review Request: smarteiffel - The GNU Eiffel Compiler and Libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609231717.k8NHHuYs028446@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: smarteiffel - The GNU Eiffel Compiler and Libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195683 gemi at bluewin.ch changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From gemi at bluewin.ch 2006-09-23 13:17 EST ------- Built on FC5 and devel. Made entries in owners.list and comps-fe5.xml.in and comps-fe6.xml.in. Thanks for the review! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 23 17:19:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006 13:19:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207795] Review Request: perl-Perl-Critic - Critique Perl source code for best-practices In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609231719.k8NHJZlq028525@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Perl-Critic - Critique Perl source code for best-practices https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207795 ------- Additional Comments From jpo at di.uminho.pt 2006-09-23 13:19 EST ------- Tibbs, Thanks for the review. The package has been imported and already built for devel. I will close this ticket as soon as the package gets built for FC-5 (branch pending). jpo -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 23 17:19:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006 13:19:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207798] Review Request: perl-Test-File - Test file attributes In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609231719.k8NHJh1x028550@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-File - Test file attributes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207798 ------- Additional Comments From jpo at di.uminho.pt 2006-09-23 13:19 EST ------- Tibbs, Thanks for the review. The package has been imported and already built for devel. I will close this ticket as soon as the package gets built for FC-5 (branch pending). jpo -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 23 17:20:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006 13:20:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207802] Review Request: libpaper - Library and tools for handling papersize In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609231720.k8NHKsuL028600@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libpaper - Library and tools for handling papersize https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207802 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pertusus at free.fr ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-09-23 13:20 EST ------- I have spotted some more or less minor issues: * the man pages for functions should be in the devel package %{_mandir}/man3/* * removing unneded files rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_libdir}/*.la rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_libdir}/*.a should be without -r and even maybe without f * I think that there is no need to set letter as a default, it is allready the default according to the man paperconf. In my opinion, what should be better is an empty file or a file with a comment along echo '# Simply write the paper name. See papersize(5) for possible values' > $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_sysconfdir}/papersize * in man paperconfig there is a reference to /etc/libpaper.d * The file NEWS in debian/ should certainly be in %doc -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 23 17:30:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006 13:30:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 168719] Review Request: gdal In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609231730.k8NHU1KD028975@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gdal https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=168719 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|WONTFIX |DUPLICATE ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-09-23 13:29 EST ------- Marking this as duplicate as new request appeared. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 205955 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 23 17:30:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006 13:30:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205955] Review Request: gdal - A translator library for raster geospatial data formats In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609231730.k8NHUGo8029013@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gdal - A translator library for raster geospatial data formats https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205955 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |silke at intevation.de ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-09-23 13:30 EST ------- *** Bug 168719 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 23 17:32:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006 13:32:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207810] New: Review Request: gaim-galago - Galago feed plugin for Gaim Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207810 Summary: Review Request: gaim-galago - Galago feed plugin for Gaim Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: bdpepple at ameritech.net QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://piedmont.homelinux.org/fedora/libgalago/gaim-galago.spec SRPM URL: http://piedmont.homelinux.org/fedora/libgalago/gaim-galago-0.5.0-1.src.rpm Description: A plugin for the Gaim instant messenger client that allows it to act as a presence feed for Galago. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 23 17:39:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006 13:39:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206693] Review Request: KTechlab - Development and simulation of microcontrollers and electronic circuits In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609231739.k8NHdhet029552@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: KTechlab - Development and simulation of microcontrollers and electronic circuits https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206693 ------- Additional Comments From aportal at univ-montp2.fr 2006-09-23 13:39 EST ------- Chitlesh, I don't know if you saw that: http://ktechlab.org/download/gpsim.php I commited the patch and I'll ask for rebuild on monday. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 23 17:50:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006 13:50:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207810] Review Request: gaim-galago - Galago feed plugin for Gaim In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609231750.k8NHoLrQ029772@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gaim-galago - Galago feed plugin for Gaim https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207810 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-09-23 13:50 EST ------- Well, looks very simple package. Just explain why this package requires galago-daemon? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 23 17:50:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006 13:50:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207796] Review Request: eventlog - Syslog-ng v2 support library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609231750.k8NHokHU029832@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eventlog - Syslog-ng v2 support library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207796 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-09-23 13:50 EST ------- It's not necessary to have: Requires(post): /sbin/ldconfig Requires(postun): /sbin/ldconfig since you are using the %post -p /sbin/ldconfig form for your scriptlets. Not a blocker, of course, but /sbin/ldconfig does show up four times in the dependency list. * source files match upstream: a6bdba91f88540cc69b398fd138d86cd eventlog-0.2.5.tar.gz * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * dist tag is present. * build root is correct. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. License text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * compiler flags are appropriate. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * package installs properly * debuginfo package looks complete. * rpmlint has one acceptable warning. * final provides and requires are sane: eventlog-0.2.5-1.fc6.x86_64.rpm libevtlog.so.0()(64bit) eventlog = 0.2.5-1.fc6 = /sbin/ldconfig libevtlog.so.0()(64bit) eventlog-devel-0.2.5-1.fc6.x86_64.rpm eventlog-devel = 0.2.5-1.fc6 = eventlog = 0.2.5-1.fc6 libevtlog.so.0()(64bit) * %check is not present; no test suite upstream * shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths; ldconfig called as necessary. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * scriptlets are OK (ldconfig) * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * headers are in the -devel subpackage. * pkgconfig file is in the -devel subpackage. * static libraries and unversioned .so files are in the -devel subpackage. * static libraries are acceptable in this instance. * no libtool .la droppings. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 23 17:50:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006 13:50:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207810] Review Request: gaim-galago - Galago feed plugin for Gaim In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609231750.k8NHort1029859@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gaim-galago - Galago feed plugin for Gaim https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207810 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 23 17:52:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006 13:52:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187317] Review Request: mindi In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609231752.k8NHqClU029924@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mindi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187317 ------- Additional Comments From bruno.cornec at hp.com 2006-09-23 13:52 EST ------- I need to check the pre-built fedore busybox contain all the options needed by mindi. I'll look at it and report. Concerning ppc, have you really looked at what mindi does ? It you want to port it, then propose patches upstream, but I do not have any time nor hardware to do that myself sorry. Do you ask for elilo to be available on ppc too ? mindi deals with boatloading and then has a lot of dependancies with lilo/syslinux/isolinux/elilo which means that you really need to adapt it for ppc if you want it to work on power. I also wanted to add that you do NOT provide a disaster recovey solution for fedora currently whereas I have add much less problem to integrate mindi and mondo in Mandriva, OpenSuSE or Debian. I try to follow the requirements you give for the spec file, but can't follow when you deal with porting, internals of the tool ... which are upstream concerns not packaging concerns. Now if the goal is to avoid adding packages to fedora, I would prefer a clear opinion on that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 23 17:56:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006 13:56:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207802] Review Request: libpaper - Library and tools for handling papersize In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609231756.k8NHuAbp030049@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libpaper - Library and tools for handling papersize https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207802 ------- Additional Comments From dan at danny.cz 2006-09-23 13:56 EST ------- Yes, I really missed the man3 directory. The rest is minor, but reasonable. Also in debian/po subdirectory there are hidden localized files. It would be nice to have them installed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 23 17:59:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006 13:59:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207810] Review Request: gaim-galago - Galago feed plugin for Gaim In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609231759.k8NHxrWl030136@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gaim-galago - Galago feed plugin for Gaim https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207810 ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at ameritech.net 2006-09-23 13:59 EST ------- When applications that act as presence feeds use libgalago, information that they set on the various objects are transmitted to galago-daemon. galago-daemon then combines the new information with information it may already have on the various type of object (which would be sent from other presence feeds) and then retransmits it out to anything that's listening. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 23 18:00:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006 14:00:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206222] Review Request: manaworld-music - music for the manaworld game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609231800.k8NI0Mk9030161@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: manaworld-music - music for the manaworld game Alias: manaworld-music https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206222 wart at kobold.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2006-09-23 14:00 EST ------- Imported and built. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 23 18:02:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006 14:02:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203212] Review Request: libgalago-gtk In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609231802.k8NI20dm030233@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgalago-gtk https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203212 bdpepple at ameritech.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 23 18:09:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006 14:09:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207810] Review Request: gaim-galago - Galago feed plugin for Gaim In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609231809.k8NI9MqL030447@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gaim-galago - Galago feed plugin for Gaim https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207810 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-09-23 14:09 EST ------- Another thing: When I wanted to check http://www.galago.info/ , I was re-directed to http://www.games.tl/ . Is this okay? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 23 18:15:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006 14:15:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207810] Review Request: gaim-galago - Galago feed plugin for Gaim In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609231815.k8NIFLMf030651@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gaim-galago - Galago feed plugin for Gaim https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207810 ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at ameritech.net 2006-09-23 14:15 EST ------- Ah, the website changed its address since I originally wrote this spec. I'll need to change it before importing it into cvs. It should be: http://www.galago-project.org/news/index.php -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 23 18:17:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006 14:17:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207810] Review Request: gaim-galago - Galago feed plugin for Gaim In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609231817.k8NIHvr0030731@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gaim-galago - Galago feed plugin for Gaim https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207810 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-09-23 14:17 EST ------- Okay, just correct URL. --------------------------------------------------------- This package (gaim-galago) is APPROVED by me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 23 18:18:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006 14:18:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207781] Review Request: libmatheval - parse and evaluate symbolic expressions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609231818.k8NIICAF030752@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libmatheval - parse and evaluate symbolic expressions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207781 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-09-23 14:18 EST ------- This crops up during a mock build: /builddir/build/BUILD/libmatheval-1.1.3/config/missing: line 52: makeinfo: command not found WARNING: `makeinfo' is missing on your system. You should only need it if you modified a `.texi' or `.texinfo' file, or any other file indirectly affecting the aspect of the manual. The spurious call might also be the consequence of using a buggy `make' (AIX, DU, IRIX). You might want to install the `Texinfo' package or the `GNU make' package. Grab either from any GNU archive site. Indeed, you do modify a .texi file so you'll need a BR: texinfo. Also, one of the tests fails on my platform (x86_64, rawhide): Checking evaluating functions. 5: Check functions. FAILED (functions.at:423) Unfortunately you have ||: at the end of the make check line so the build continues when it really should fail and thus deletes the test log. I've rebuilt without that bit and will attach the generated testsuite.log. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 23 18:20:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006 14:20:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207781] Review Request: libmatheval - parse and evaluate symbolic expressions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609231820.k8NIKajE030819@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libmatheval - parse and evaluate symbolic expressions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207781 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-09-23 14:20 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=137005) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=137005&action=view) Log from failing test suite. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 23 18:43:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006 14:43:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 185423] Review Request: php-pear-PEAR-Command-Packaging: make-rpm-spec command for PEAR In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609231843.k8NIhjBw031731@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-PEAR-Command-Packaging: make-rpm-spec command for PEAR Alias: php-pear-PCP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=185423 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO OtherBugsDependingO|163779 |163778 nThis| | Flag| |needinfo?(rpm at timj.co.uk) ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2006-09-23 14:43 EST ------- Changing this back to FE-REVIEW and NEEDINFO status since it's been several weeks since this was approved and nothing has been done. Let me know when you are no longer AWOL. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 23 18:45:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006 14:45:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187196] Review Request: kernel-module-rt2500 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609231845.k8NIjkgY031874@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kernel-module-rt2500 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187196 ------- Additional Comments From davidf at sjsoft.com 2006-09-23 14:45 EST ------- Actual module built successfully for me with this on FC4 with kernel 2.6.17_1.2142_FC4, i686, no smp Couldn't build as non-root user as make install does /sbin/depmod -a and also installs directly into /lib/modules - DESTDIR apparently doing nothing tried to fix it up, then discovered bug 202528 and bug 202529 These are much more up to date and correct and build successfully, so this bug should probably be marked as a duplicated of them... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 23 18:49:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006 14:49:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202528] Review Request: rt2500-kmod In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609231849.k8NIn4ru032041@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rt2500-kmod https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202528 davidf at sjsoft.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |202521 ------- Additional Comments From davidf at sjsoft.com 2006-09-23 14:49 EST ------- Depends on RutilT -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 23 18:49:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006 14:49:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202521] Review Request: RutilT In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609231849.k8NInFGp032058@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: RutilT https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202521 davidf at sjsoft.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |202528 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 23 19:47:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006 15:47:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202529] Review Request: rt2500-(kmod-common) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609231947.k8NJlTq2001421@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rt2500-(kmod-common) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202529 ------- Additional Comments From davidf at sjsoft.com 2006-09-23 15:47 EST ------- some of the install -D caused problems for me in the latest spec file - they seemed to be in the case where there is a file given with a directory destination (-D expects the full pathname as destination): mkdir -p $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_sysconfdir}/sysconfig/network-scripts install -D -p -m 0644 Module/ifcfg-ra0 $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_sysconfdir}/sysconfig/network-scripts That -D (and several other similar) should be removed AFAICT -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 23 20:11:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006 16:11:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207761] Review Request: xpdf - A PDF file viewer for the X Window System In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609232011.k8NKB1bX002056@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xpdf - A PDF file viewer for the X Window System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207761 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-09-23 16:10 EST ------- More issues: * $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/etc/X11/applnk/Graphics seems to be unneeded * removing the files should better be without -r and, in my opinion even without f. * /etc/xpdfrc in %files should be %{_sysconfdir}. And it should also be nice to have a sed on all the files mentionning /etc/xpdfrc substituted by the patches. Something along for file in doc/*.1 doc/*.5 xpdf-*/README; do sed -i -e 's:/etc/xpdfrc:%{_sysconfdir}/xpdfrc:g' done * similarly /usr/share in the relevant files should be changed to %{_datadir}. Something along for file in xpdf-*/README xpdf-*/add-to-xpdfrc; do sed -i -e 's:/usr/share/:%{_datadir}/:g' done * All the README files that are in /usr/share/xpdf/LANG/README should be in %doc, and I propose to have for them the name README.LANG for each LANG. * The add-to-xpdfrc files should certainly be marked as %config. Also it is not obvious that these files are rightly in /usr/share/xpdf/LANG/. In my opinion they should better be in /etc. What I would suggest would be to add the directory %{_sysconfdir}/xpdf/ and put the add-to-xpdfrc within subdirectories one for each language, or, if you prefer otherwise, something similar. xpdf-3.01-redhat.patch should then be updated (the part corresponding with xpdf-3.00/doc/sample-xpdfrc). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 23 20:14:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006 16:14:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207761] Review Request: xpdf - A PDF file viewer for the X Window System In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609232014.k8NKEhkj002174@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xpdf - A PDF file viewer for the X Window System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207761 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-09-23 16:14 EST ------- Those BR seems unneeded BuildRequires: fileutils BuildRequires: findutils And there is a duplicate Requires: poppler-utils in the main package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 23 20:48:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006 16:48:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205300] Review Request: gtk-sharp - a set of mono bindings for gtk1.2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609232048.k8NKmRWO003135@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtk-sharp - a set of mono bindings for gtk1.2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205300 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-09-23 16:48 EST ------- "W: gtk-sharp non-executable-in-bin /usr/bin/gconfsharp-schemagen.exe 0644 Should this be 755?" Yes and fixed. "W: gtk-sharp strange-permission gtksharp-libdir.patch 0666 The patch should probibly be 644. " Done Spec URL: http://www.knox.net.nz/~nodoid/gtk-sharp.spec SRPM URL: http://www.knox.net.nz/~nodoid/gtk-sharp-1.0.10-10.src.rpm "E: gtk-sharp hardcoded-library-path in %{_prefix}/lib Is this normal for mono packages? " It is for the moment. The problem is that the current FC5 release of mono still depends on everything being in /usr/lib irrespective of the processor used. The version in rawhide/FC6 has this problem corrected. When FC5's version is upgraded to the current version (1.1.17), the hack goes. All the other problems have been fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 23 21:00:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006 17:00:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196591] Review Request: bitlbee In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609232100.k8NL0lFd003407@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bitlbee https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196591 ------- Additional Comments From redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de 2006-09-23 17:00 EST ------- Paul, did you finish the proxy testing? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 23 21:20:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006 17:20:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 185423] Review Request: php-pear-PEAR-Command-Packaging: make-rpm-spec command for PEAR In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609232120.k8NLKCd9003910@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-PEAR-Command-Packaging: make-rpm-spec command for PEAR Alias: php-pear-PCP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=185423 rpm at timj.co.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(rpm at timj.co.uk) | ------- Additional Comments From rpm at timj.co.uk 2006-09-23 17:20 EST ------- I'm not AWOL. This one has just slipped under the radar, sorry. I'll import and build ASAP. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 23 21:22:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006 17:22:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207818] New: Review Request: eds-feed - Evolution Data Server feed for Galago Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207818 Summary: Review Request: eds-feed - Evolution Data Server feed for Galago Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: bdpepple at ameritech.net QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://piedmont.homelinux.org/fedora/libgalago/eds-feed.spec SRPM URL: http://piedmont.homelinux.org/fedora/libgalago/eds-feed-0.5.0-1.src.rpm Description: A feed for Galago that uses contact entries in the Evolution address book to link people and accounts. Note: This spec is for FC6, since it includes the patch for the api change in the eds. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 23 21:34:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006 17:34:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199108] Review Request: gutenprint: Printer Drivers Package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609232134.k8NLYboe004386@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gutenprint: Printer Drivers Package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199108 lmacken at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |196989 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-09-15 21:12 EST ------- Perhaps we could call for testers on fedora-extras and fedora-devel lists? Parag: Can you ask for testers on those lists? If you like I can probibly build packages for fc5|fc6 i386/x86_64 and put them up so people don't need to build the packages to test... I would feel better if we had at least a few 'this works fine for me' reports... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 23 21:36:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006 17:36:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207174] Review Request: whatmask - Convert between different netmask types and show information In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609232136.k8NLaXSH004499@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: whatmask - Convert between different netmask types and show information https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207174 rpm at timj.co.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From rpm at timj.co.uk 2006-09-23 17:36 EST ------- Thanks for the review and comments. Built successfully in devel (job #18275) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 23 21:44:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006 17:44:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 185423] Review Request: php-pear-PEAR-Command-Packaging: make-rpm-spec command for PEAR In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609232144.k8NLiMNo004810@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-PEAR-Command-Packaging: make-rpm-spec command for PEAR Alias: php-pear-PCP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=185423 rpm at timj.co.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From rpm at timj.co.uk 2006-09-23 17:44 EST ------- Thanks for all the comments and review. successfully built in devel (job #18300) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 23 23:38:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006 19:38:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207763] Review Request: ddd - GUI for several command-line debuggers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609232338.k8NNctFY007894@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ddd - GUI for several command-line debuggers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207763 ------- Additional Comments From giallu at gmail.com 2006-09-23 19:38 EST ------- just a couple of quickie: 1. Buildroot does not seems to be the "preferred" extras one 2. gcc-c++ should be safely removed from BRs -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 24 00:47:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006 20:47:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207141] Review Request: farsight - A audio/video conferencing framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609240047.k8O0lnaQ009778@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: farsight - A audio/video conferencing framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207141 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-09-23 20:47 EST ------- ok. Change the spec to have License: LGPL and this package is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 24 01:09:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006 21:09:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207802] Review Request: libpaper - Library and tools for handling papersize In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609240109.k8O19dXN010205@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libpaper - Library and tools for handling papersize https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207802 ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2006-09-23 21:09 EST ------- Thanks for the feedback. -3 should resolve all the above issues. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 24 01:42:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006 21:42:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207761] Review Request: xpdf - A PDF file viewer for the X Window System In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609240142.k8O1gxqp011144@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xpdf - A PDF file viewer for the X Window System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207761 ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2006-09-23 21:42 EST ------- You sir, are a machine. All items updated in -19. New SRPM: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/xpdf-3.01-19.fc6.src.rpm New SPEC: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/xpdf.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 24 02:24:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006 22:24:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207781] Review Request: libmatheval - parse and evaluate symbolic expressions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609240224.k8O2ORQk011992@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libmatheval - parse and evaluate symbolic expressions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207781 ------- Additional Comments From ed at eh3.com 2006-09-23 22:24 EST ------- Hi Jason, thatanks for taking a look. I spent some time today digging into the "make check" errors and it turns out that there are some deprecated guile bits which are: SCM_STRINGP is deprecated. Use scm_is_string instead. SCM_LENGTH is deprecated. Use scm_c_string_length instead, for example, or see the manual. SCM_STRING_LENGTH is deprecated. Use scm_c_string_length instead. SCM_CHARS is deprecated. See the manual for alternatives. SCM_STRING_CHARS is deprecated. See the manual for alternatives. The interesting thing is that these deprecated bits *ONLY* appear in the the file "libmatheval-1.1.3/tests/matheval.c" and nowhere else in the actual libmatheval code. So it appears that there are some deprecated bits only in the testing code that then triggers some warnings that then causes one of the tests (test number 5) to "fail" (although the test actually works, it just emits a bunch of these warnings so that the test script *thinks* that it has failed). In any case, I'll report the deprecated bits in the testing code to the upstream folks. But I see no reason to do anything else since there appear to be no other deprecated (or otherwise broken) bits in any of the actual library code. Here's an update that includes the BR: texinfo http://mitgcm.org/eh3/fedora_misc/libmatheval-1.1.3-4.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 24 02:57:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006 22:57:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196669] Review Request: filesystem-i18n In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609240257.k8O2v9ia012942@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: filesystem-i18n https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196669 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-09-23 22:56 EST ------- man already owns most/all of %_datadir/man/, so man could also own %{_datadir}/man//man{1-9}. It could be argued that these should be in man, and not here, so that manpages will (implicitly) depend on man (for directory ownership). OTOH, why should man have to complicate it's packaging so, when it could be so easily included here? OK, I'm officially undecided. (: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 24 03:06:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006 23:06:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207818] Review Request: eds-feed - Evolution Data Server feed for Galago In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609240306.k8O36n7h013175@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eds-feed - Evolution Data Server feed for Galago https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207818 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 24 03:10:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006 23:10:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207818] Review Request: eds-feed - Evolution Data Server feed for Galago In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609240310.k8O3Ac4Y013313@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eds-feed - Evolution Data Server feed for Galago https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207818 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 24 03:38:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006 23:38:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187317] Review Request: mindi In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609240338.k8O3cOXK014152@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mindi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187317 ------- Additional Comments From dennis at ausil.us 2006-09-23 23:38 EST ------- if the fedora busybox is missing something you need then please file bugs against busybox. as far as ppc goes i will look at what is needed in regards to porting to ppc. we have a policy to have all arches except when something is arch specific. we use yaboot for ppc loading. We have a clear set of guidelines for packaging and reviewing. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines#head-2f03bba0a9f05b2ac0128eb1d70b1e3ce9f9dc40 states - MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch needs to have a bug filed in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug number should then be placed in a comment, next to the corresponding ExcludeArch line. New packages will not have bugzilla entries during the review process, so they should put this description in the comment until the package is approved, then file the bugzilla entry, and replace the long explanation with the bug number. (Extras Only) The bug should be marked as blocking one (or more) of the following bugs to simplify tracking such issues: [WWW] FE-ExcludeArch-x86, [WWW] FE-ExcludeArch-x64, [WWW] FE-ExcludeArch-ppc -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 24 04:50:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 00:50:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206693] Review Request: KTechlab - Development and simulation of microcontrollers and electronic circuits In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609240450.k8O4o3aW015811@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: KTechlab - Development and simulation of microcontrollers and electronic circuits https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206693 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2006-09-24 00:49 EST ------- (In reply to comment #15) > (In reply to comment #14) > > I'm not agree with the removal of Requires gputils gpsim. > > > > Ktechlab requires gputils for PIC simulation. > > > > Well, if it is common that Ktechlab is used for PIC simulation , in which case > gputils is required generally, making Ktechlab require gputils is reasonable. Quite easy to prove/counter-prove: Show us the piece of source code that introduces this dependency on gputils! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 24 04:57:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 00:57:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207818] Review Request: eds-feed - Evolution Data Server feed for Galago In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609240457.k8O4v3dn016068@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eds-feed - Evolution Data Server feed for Galago https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207818 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-09-24 00:56 EST ------- No problem is found. ----------------------------------------------------- This problem (eds-feed) is APPROVED by me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 24 05:00:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 01:00:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206693] Review Request: KTechlab - Development and simulation of microcontrollers and electronic circuits In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609240500.k8O50ZbR016245@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: KTechlab - Development and simulation of microcontrollers and electronic circuits https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206693 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-09-24 01:00 EST ------- (In reply to comment #17) > (In reply to comment #15) > > (In reply to comment #14) > > > I'm not agree with the removal of Requires gputils gpsim. > > > > > > Ktechlab requires gputils for PIC simulation. > > > > > > > Well, if it is common that Ktechlab is used for PIC simulation , in which case > > gputils is required generally, making Ktechlab require gputils is reasonable. > > Quite easy to prove/counter-prove: Show us the piece of source code that > introduces this dependency on gputils! Well, autually: [tasaka1 at localhost ktechlab-0.3]$ grep -r 'gputils' . ./doc/en/flowcode.docbook: Of course, if you don't have gputils installed - with which gpasm is distributed - then the last step can't be performed. ./src/languages/gpdasm.cpp: KMessageBox::sorry( LanguageManager::self()->logView(), i18n("Disassembly failed. Please check you have gputils installed.") ); ./src/languages/gpasm.cpp: KMessageBox::sorry( LanguageManager::self()->logView(), i18n("Assembly failed. Please check you have gputils installed.") ); ./src/languages/gplink.cpp: KMessageBox::sorry( LanguageManager::self()->logView(), i18n("Linking failed. Please check you have gputils installed.") ); ./src/languages/gplib.cpp: KMessageBox::sorry( LanguageManager::self()->logView(), i18n("Linking failed. Please check you have gputils installed.") ); -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 24 05:10:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 01:10:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206693] Review Request: KTechlab - Development and simulation of microcontrollers and electronic circuits In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609240510.k8O5AZQF016551@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: KTechlab - Development and simulation of microcontrollers and electronic circuits https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206693 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-09-24 01:10 EST ------- And... [tasaka1 at localhost ktechlab-0.3-2]$ for f in `rpm -qlp gputils-0.13.4-1.fc6.i386.rpm | sed -n -e 's|/usr/bin/||p'` ; do grep -r "[^A-Za-z]$f[^A-Za-z\.]" . ; done | grep cpp: ./ktechlab-0.3/microbe/microbe.cpp: // Things starting with b are reserved by gpasm (for binary numbers) ./ktechlab-0.3/src/gui/settingsdlg.cpp: addPage( m_gpasmSettingsWidget, "Gpasm", "convert_to_hex", "gpasm" ); ./ktechlab-0.3/src/languages/processchain.cpp: INDIRECT_PROCESS( AssemblyAbsolute_PIC, gpasm, ".hex" ) ./ktechlab-0.3/src/languages/processchain.cpp: DIRECT_PROCESS( AssemblyAbsolute_Program, gpasm ) ./ktechlab-0.3/src/languages/processchain.cpp: INDIRECT_PROCESS( AssemblyRelocatable_Library, gpasm, ".o" ) ./ktechlab-0.3/src/languages/processchain.cpp: DIRECT_PROCESS( AssemblyRelocatable_Object, gpasm ) ./ktechlab-0.3/src/languages/processchain.cpp: INDIRECT_PROCESS( AssemblyRelocatable_PIC, gpasm, ".o" ) ./ktechlab-0.3/src/languages/processchain.cpp: INDIRECT_PROCESS( AssemblyRelocatable_Program, gpasm, ".o" ) ./ktechlab-0.3/src/languages/processchain.cpp:LanguageFunction( Gpasm, gpasm, m_pGpasm ) ./ktechlab-0.3/src/languages/gpasm.cpp: *m_languageProcess << ("gpasm"); ./ktechlab-0.3/src/languages/gpdasm.cpp: *m_languageProcess << ("gpdasm"); ./ktechlab-0.3/src/languages/processchain.cpp: DIRECT_PROCESS( Object_Disassembly, gpdasm ) ./ktechlab-0.3/src/languages/processchain.cpp: DIRECT_PROCESS( Program_Disassembly, gpdasm ) ./ktechlab-0.3/src/languages/processchain.cpp:LanguageFunction( Gpdasm, gpdasm, m_pGpdasm ) ./ktechlab-0.3/src/languages/processchain.cpp: DIRECT_PROCESS( Object_Library, gplib ) ./ktechlab-0.3/src/languages/processchain.cpp:LanguageFunction( Gplib, gplib, m_pGplib ) ./ktechlab-0.3/src/languages/gplib.cpp: *m_languageProcess << ("gplib"); ./ktechlab-0.3/src/gui/projectdlgs.cpp: //BEGIN Update gplink options ./ktechlab-0.3/src/gui/projectdlgs.cpp: //END Update gplink options ./ktechlab-0.3/src/languages/processchain.cpp: INDIRECT_PROCESS( Object_PIC, gplink, ".lib" ) ./ktechlab-0.3/src/languages/processchain.cpp: DIRECT_PROCESS( Object_Program, gplink ) ./ktechlab-0.3/src/languages/processchain.cpp:LanguageFunction( Gplink, gplink, m_pGplink ) ./ktechlab-0.3/src/languages/gplink.cpp: *m_languageProcess << ("gplink"); -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 24 05:17:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 01:17:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207810] Review Request: gaim-galago - Galago feed plugin for Gaim In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609240517.k8O5HVGY016770@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gaim-galago - Galago feed plugin for Gaim https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207810 bdpepple at ameritech.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 24 05:19:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 01:19:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207141] Review Request: farsight - A audio/video conferencing framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609240519.k8O5JTOe016818@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: farsight - A audio/video conferencing framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207141 bdpepple at ameritech.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 24 06:18:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 02:18:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206693] Review Request: KTechlab - Development and simulation of microcontrollers and electronic circuits In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609240618.k8O6IF85018219@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: KTechlab - Development and simulation of microcontrollers and electronic circuits https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206693 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2006-09-24 02:18 EST ------- (In reply to comment #18) No call to gputils ;) (In reply to comment #19) OK, these probably contain calls to gputils. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 24 07:21:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 03:21:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207612] Review Request: zidrav - Zorba's Incredible Data Repairer And Verifier In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609240721.k8O7LP1i019761@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: zidrav - Zorba's Incredible Data Repairer And Verifier https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207612 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-09-24 03:21 EST ------- So, who is currently reviewing this? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 24 08:32:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 04:32:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207761] Review Request: xpdf - A PDF file viewer for the X Window System In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609240832.k8O8WLhm009976@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xpdf - A PDF file viewer for the X Window System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207761 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-09-24 04:32 EST ------- It is almost right from my point of view, but I still have some comments... * Using the acroread png for xpdf seems quite wrong to me, it may even be a trademark violation (but I don't know that subject a lot). I found an icon which should be much more suitable: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Xpdf-icon.PNG the acroread.png could, however be used for pdf files in my opinion. However I guess such icons are allready shipped with fedora. * Maybe the config files for the different languages in /etc/xpdf should have a %lang() in %files -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 24 08:33:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 04:33:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206487] Review Request: jd - A 2ch browser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609240833.k8O8XeR9010078@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jd - A 2ch browser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206487 cgoorah at yahoo.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |cgoorah at yahoo.com.au -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 24 08:51:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 04:51:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207763] Review Request: ddd - GUI for several command-line debuggers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609240851.k8O8pS6T011053@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ddd - GUI for several command-line debuggers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207763 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-09-24 04:51 EST ------- * desktop-file-install vendor should be fedora * many BR are allready indirectly required: lesstif-devel requires libXext-devel libXp-devel libXt-devel libXt-devel requires libX11-devel libSM-devel libSM-devel requires libICE-devel * is the .gz needed in the install info snippet? Wouldn't it be better without? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 24 09:07:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 05:07:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207761] Review Request: xpdf - A PDF file viewer for the X Window System In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609240907.k8O97eFZ011868@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xpdf - A PDF file viewer for the X Window System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207761 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-09-24 05:07 EST ------- Yet another, I think that Requires(post): desktop-file-utils Requires(postun): desktop-file-utils should be replaced by BuildRequires: desktop-file-utils -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 24 11:22:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 07:22:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207082] Review Request: perl-Feed-Find - Syndication feed auto-discovery In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609241122.k8OBMkt1017828@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Feed-Find - Syndication feed auto-discovery https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207082 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-09-24 07:22 EST ------- Thanks for the review. I imported in cvs after removing the test in %prep. It built in devel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 24 11:31:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 07:31:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207612] Review Request: zidrav - Zorba's Incredible Data Repairer And Verifier In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609241131.k8OBVnwx018335@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: zidrav - Zorba's Incredible Data Repairer And Verifier https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207612 ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2006-09-24 07:31 EST ------- I'm unsure. Does Scott have fedorabugs membership? I can't verify, because the site is timing out on me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 24 11:47:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 07:47:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207839] New: Review Request: lush - An object-oriented Lisp interpreter and compiler Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207839 Summary: Review Request: lush - An object-oriented Lisp interpreter and compiler Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: gemi at bluewin.ch QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://math.ifi.unizh.ch/fedora/spec/lush.spec SRPM URL: http://math.ifi.unizh.ch/fedora/5/i386/SRPMS.gemi/lush-1.2-1.src.rpm Description: Lush is an object-oriented programming language designed for researchers, experimenters, and engineers interested in large-scale numerical and graphic applications. Lush is designed to be used in situations where one would want to combine the flexibility of a high-level, loosely-typed interpreted language, with the efficiency of a strongly-typed, natively-compiled language, and with the easy integration of code written in C, C++, or other languages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 24 11:50:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 07:50:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 173459] Review Request: initng In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609241150.k8OBovPM019467@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 daner964 at student.liu.se changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #136952|0 |1 is obsolete| | ------- Additional Comments From daner964 at student.liu.se 2006-09-24 07:50 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=137015) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=137015&action=view) initng 0.6.8-3 spec file - Fix up permissions of .so files - Remove the rpath stuff that works out-of-the-box with recent cmake - Include Enrico's patch to check if there is any selinux (Thanks a lot for that one Enrico!) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 24 12:00:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 08:00:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207798] Review Request: perl-Test-File - Test file attributes In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609241200.k8OC0Leu019813@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-File - Test file attributes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207798 jpo at di.uminho.pt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From jpo at di.uminho.pt 2006-09-24 08:00 EST ------- Also built for FC-5. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 24 12:01:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 08:01:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207612] Review Request: zidrav - Zorba's Incredible Data Repairer And Verifier In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609241201.k8OC1DEZ019864@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: zidrav - Zorba's Incredible Data Repairer And Verifier https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207612 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-09-24 08:01 EST ------- (In reply to comment #10) > I'm unsure. Does Scott have fedorabugs membership? I can't verify, because the > site is timing out on me. It seems. ------------------------------------------------------------ Here are some of the main details about this user: muerte is Scott Baker . Their GPG key ID is 7b709def. Comments: Member of groups: cla_done(user/approved) fedorabugs(user/approved) cvsextras(user/approved) ------------------------------------------------------------ Umm.. I don't know why Scott's mail address differs.... However, this is surely him because the user (muerte) is the maintainer of qcomicbook (bug 204343) and in the bug he uses the mail address scott at perturb.org . -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 24 12:02:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 08:02:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207795] Review Request: perl-Perl-Critic - Critique Perl source code for best-practices In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609241202.k8OC2W79019918@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Perl-Critic - Critique Perl source code for best-practices https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207795 jpo at di.uminho.pt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From jpo at di.uminho.pt 2006-09-24 08:02 EST ------- Just built for FC-5. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 24 12:07:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 08:07:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207796] Review Request: eventlog - Syslog-ng v2 support library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609241207.k8OC75a4020072@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eventlog - Syslog-ng v2 support library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207796 jpo at di.uminho.pt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From jpo at di.uminho.pt 2006-09-24 08:07 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > It's not necessary to have: > Requires(post): /sbin/ldconfig > Requires(postun): /sbin/ldconfig > since you are using the > %post -p /sbin/ldconfig > form for your scriptlets. Not a blocker, of course, but /sbin/ldconfig does > show up four times in the dependency list. The redundant requirements were removed. Package imported and built for FC-5 and devel. Thanks for the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 24 12:41:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 08:41:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206693] Review Request: KTechlab - Development and simulation of microcontrollers and electronic circuits In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609241241.k8OCfgPS021021@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: KTechlab - Development and simulation of microcontrollers and electronic circuits https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206693 ------- Additional Comments From aportal at univ-montp2.fr 2006-09-24 08:41 EST ------- gputils is the name of the package that is a set of tools, not of the binaries. The binaries that are called are gpasm, gpdasm, gplib, gplink -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 24 13:06:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 09:06:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 173459] Review Request: initng In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609241306.k8OD6RBI022691@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 enrico.scholz at informatik.tu-chemnitz.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From enrico.scholz at informatik.tu-chemnitz.de 2006-09-24 09:06 EST ------- ok, both initng and initng-ifiles are ACCEPTed - remaining rpmlint warnings can be ignored - basic checks on my system show that 'initng' works -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 24 13:48:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 09:48:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207047] Review Request: ed2k_hash - Ed2k file hash calculator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609241348.k8ODm956023858@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ed2k_hash - Ed2k file hash calculator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207047 ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2006-09-24 09:48 EST ------- http://rpm.greysector.net/extras/ed2k_hash.spec http://rpm.greysector.net/extras/ed2k_hash-0.4.0-2.src.rpm - added dist tag - converted AUTHORS to utf8 - added an icon from ed2k-gtk-gui -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 24 14:36:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 10:36:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207047] Review Request: ed2k_hash - Ed2k file hash calculator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609241436.k8OEao6K025042@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ed2k_hash - Ed2k file hash calculator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207047 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-09-24 10:36 EST ------- Well, one thing to be fixed. All %post, %postun scriptlets should be for gui package. I want to check this package once more to check if the icon installed appear on GNOME menu. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 24 14:43:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 10:43:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207782] Review Request: itpp - C++ library for math, signal/speech processing, and communications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609241443.k8OEhIa5025283@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: itpp - C++ library for math, signal/speech processing, and communications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207782 ------- Additional Comments From ed at eh3.com 2006-09-24 10:43 EST ------- Hi Ralf, heres an update where I've tried to address all of the items in the two above comments: http://mitgcm.org/eh3/fedora_misc/itpp-3.10.5-3.src.rpm Also, I found that the --disable-dependency-tracking shaved the build time by 5% on my otherwise inactive laptop (6.33min vs. 6.02min). I didn't add it to the spec file this time but probably will soon. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 24 15:11:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 11:11:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207612] Review Request: zidrav - Zorba's Incredible Data Repairer And Verifier In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609241511.k8OFBlgZ025990@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: zidrav - Zorba's Incredible Data Repairer And Verifier https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207612 ------- Additional Comments From toshio at tiki-lounge.com 2006-09-24 11:11 EST ------- I approved his fedorabugs soon after this came up on IRC but apparently he didn't get my note that he is now approved. Scott you can now assign this bug to yourself and change what it blocks so people know you're reviewing it and approving it. You'll have to use the bakers web-ster.com as your email address, otherwise bugzilla and the account system will have no way of knowing you are the person allowed to assign bugs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 24 16:17:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 12:17:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 184530] Review Request: perl-RPM2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609241617.k8OGHNHD028162@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-RPM2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=184530 ------- Additional Comments From rnorwood at redhat.com 2006-09-24 12:17 EST ------- I can contact Chip to clarify the license. Since FC5 and FC6 both still seem to have rpm-4.4.2, I assume we still want to get this into extras, yes? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 24 16:31:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 12:31:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 185423] Review Request: php-pear-PEAR-Command-Packaging: make-rpm-spec command for PEAR In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609241631.k8OGVIYT029224@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-PEAR-Command-Packaging: make-rpm-spec command for PEAR Alias: php-pear-PCP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=185423 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 24 16:36:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 12:36:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207846] New: Review Request: perl-Finance-YahooQuote - Perl interface to get stock quotes from Yahoo! Finance Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207846 Summary: Review Request: perl-Finance-YahooQuote - Perl interface to get stock quotes from Yahoo! Finance Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: wtogami at redhat.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com http://togami.com/~warren/fedora/perl-Finance-YahooQuote-0.21-1.src.rpm http://togami.com/~warren/fedora/perl-Finance-YahooQuote.spec Description: Perl interface to get stock quotes from Yahoo! Finance -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 24 17:14:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 13:14:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 184530] Review Request: perl-RPM2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609241714.k8OHE6aS031975@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-RPM2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=184530 ------- Additional Comments From cturner at pattern.net 2006-09-24 13:13 EST ------- I wrote this and RPM::Specfile while at red hat. The license is the same as perl itself: Perl5 is Copyright (C) 1993-2005, by Larry Wall and others. It is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it under the terms of either: a) the GNU General Public License as published by the Free Software Foundation; either version 1, or (at your option) any later version, or b) the "Artistic License". from: http://dev.perl.org/licenses/ A lawyer or two from RH contacted me and I've told them the above on a few occasions. I'll look into making new CPAN releases of these modules with a clear license as well. HTH -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 24 18:18:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 14:18:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207806] Review Request: evolution-bogofilter - A plugin for bogofilter support in evolution In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609241818.k8OIIlHD001264@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: evolution-bogofilter - A plugin for bogofilter support in evolution https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207806 ------- Additional Comments From david at lovesunix.net 2006-09-24 14:18 EST ------- when trying to build on x86_64 I get: checking for BF_EPLUGIN... configure: error: Package requirements ( glib-2.0 evolution-plugin-2.8 camel-provider-1.2 gconf-2.0 ) were not met: Package camel-provider-1.2 was not found in the pkg-config search path. Perhaps you should add the directory containing `camel-provider-1.2.pc' to the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable Package 'camel-provider-1.2', required by 'evolution-plugin', not found Consider adjusting the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable if you installed software in a non-standard prefix. Alternatively, you may set the environment variables BF_EPLUGIN_CFLAGS and BF_EPLUGIN_LIBS to avoid the need to call pkg-config. See the pkg-config man page for more details. Solution: The package needs to BR: evolution-data-server-devel -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 24 18:24:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 14:24:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206693] Review Request: KTechlab - Development and simulation of microcontrollers and electronic circuits In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609241824.k8OIOk1M001402@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: KTechlab - Development and simulation of microcontrollers and electronic circuits https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206693 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2006-09-24 14:24 EST ------- (In reply to comment #16) > Chitlesh, > > I don't know if you saw that: http://ktechlab.org/download/gpsim.php > > I commited the patch and I'll ask for rebuild on monday. > Ok, then I'll upload ktechlab afterwards. Mamuro, thanks for the approval. For the moment, I don't have cvs access (blocked by my hostel's firewall) I'll leave this bug open till, i commit it. If I really need to commit it on the spot, do leave me a ping. I'll search another internet connection. Thanks for understanding. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 24 18:25:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 14:25:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206693] Review Request: KTechlab - Development and simulation of microcontrollers and electronic circuits In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609241825.k8OIPrsQ001454@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: KTechlab - Development and simulation of microcontrollers and electronic circuits https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206693 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2006-09-24 14:25 EST ------- This is what I'll upload: SPEC: http://chitlesh.funpic.de/rpm/ktechlab.spec SRPM: http://chitlesh.funpic.de/rpm/ktechlab-0.3-3.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 24 18:28:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 14:28:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207846] Review Request: perl-Finance-YahooQuote - Perl interface to get stock quotes from Yahoo! Finance In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609241828.k8OIS4hF001579@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Finance-YahooQuote - Perl interface to get stock quotes from Yahoo! Finance Alias: finance-YahooQuote https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207846 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: perl- |Review Request: perl- |Finance-YahooQuote - Perl |Finance-YahooQuote - Perl |interface to get stock |interface to get stock |quotes from Yahoo! Finance |quotes from Yahoo! Finance Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |chris.stone at gmail.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | Alias| |finance-YahooQuote -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 24 18:34:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 14:34:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193867] Review Request: klamav - Clam Anti-Virus on the KDE Desktop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609241834.k8OIYqG8001823@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: klamav - Clam Anti-Virus on the KDE Desktop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193867 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2006-09-24 14:34 EST ------- ping ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 24 18:40:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 14:40:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207846] Review Request: perl-Finance-YahooQuote - Perl interface to get stock quotes from Yahoo! Finance In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609241840.k8OIePo4002106@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Finance-YahooQuote - Perl interface to get stock quotes from Yahoo! Finance Alias: finance-YahooQuote https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207846 ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2006-09-24 14:40 EST ------- BuildRequires needs perl(HTTP::Request::Common) in order for mock to run %check. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 24 18:59:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 14:59:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199108] Review Request: gutenprint: Printer Drivers Package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609241859.k8OIxHB5002611@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gutenprint: Printer Drivers Package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199108 eric-bugs at omnifarious.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |eric-bugs at omnifarious.org ------- Additional Comments From eric-bugs at omnifarious.org 2006-09-24 14:59 EST ------- I would like to add that I would very much like to see this in FC6 core. I have been hand compiling and installing gutenprint for over a year now in order to support a printer that isn't properly supported by gimp-print. This has been very irritating to do, and I've gotten parts of it wrong leading to the need to configure printers through the ipp web interface instead of using system-config-printers and having garbage i18n characters show up in ipp. I'm thinking of moving a couple of friends I support to Ubuntu just because they have gutenprint. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 24 19:08:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 15:08:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206487] Review Request: jd - A 2ch browser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609241908.k8OJ85nd002882@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jd - A 2ch browser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206487 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2006-09-24 15:08 EST ------- * missing Requires: gtkmm24 -bash-3.1# rpm -ivh jd-170-0.1.b_060914.fc5.i386.rpm error: Failed dependencies: libatkmm-1.6.so.1 is needed by jd-170-0.1.b_060914.fc5.i386 libgdkmm-2.4.so.1 is needed by jd-170-0.1.b_060914.fc5.i386 libgtkmm-2.4.so.1 is needed by jd-170-0.1.b_060914.fc5.i386 libpangomm-1.4.so.1 is needed by jd-170-0.1.b_060914.fc5.i386 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 24 19:32:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 15:32:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207805] Review Request: skey - one-time password crap In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609241932.k8OJWNjl003628@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: skey - one-time password crap https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207805 ------- Additional Comments From Jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2006-09-24 15:32 EST ------- You rpmlint listing contains some messsages line 'no-url-tag' which vaiolates the packaging guidelines. If you may fix it, I will be willing to review your package. Best Regards: Jochen Schmitt -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 24 19:45:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 15:45:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207805] Review Request: skey - one-time password crap In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609241945.k8OJjV80004154@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: skey - one-time password crap https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207805 ------- Additional Comments From dwmw2 at redhat.com 2006-09-24 15:45 EST ------- As I said in the original comment, there is no appropriate URL to give. I suppose I could give 'file:/dev/null' or repeat the download tarball filename, but that seems strange. The guidelines don't really mandate the presence of a URL, do they? I'm looking at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines and http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines -- neither of which say that there must be a URL, unless I'm being particularly dim this evening. Thanks for the review, btw. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 24 20:21:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 16:21:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207853] New: Review Request: tclabc - A Tcl interface and a Tk GUI to the ABC notation Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207853 Summary: Review Request: tclabc - A Tcl interface and a Tk GUI to the ABC notation Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: gemi at bluewin.ch QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://math.ifi.unizh.ch/fedora/spec/tclabc.spec SRPM URL: http://math.ifi.unizh.ch/fedora/5/i386/SRPMS.gemi/tclabc-1.0.7-1.src.rpm Description: Tclabc is designed to help on writing music in ABC notation. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 24 21:24:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 17:24:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207846] Review Request: perl-Finance-YahooQuote - Perl interface to get stock quotes from Yahoo! Finance In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609242124.k8OLONXd006657@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Finance-YahooQuote - Perl interface to get stock quotes from Yahoo! Finance Alias: finance-YahooQuote https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207846 ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2006-09-24 17:24 EST ------- Oops, we need to turn off the %check because a package build must not require network access. Thanks. http://togami.com/~warren/fedora/perl-Finance-YahooQuote-0.21-2.src.rpm http://togami.com/~warren/fedora/perl-Finance-YahooQuote.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 24 21:55:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 17:55:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201006] Review Request: HelixPlayer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609242155.k8OLtGv5007651@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: HelixPlayer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201006 ------- Additional Comments From michael at knox.net.nz 2006-09-24 17:55 EST ------- Hi Aurelien, Thanks for working on this! Been a bit busy of late :( I am working on juggling things so I can remain a contrib dev and not have to orphan up all my packages. If you don't mind continuing with the packaging this, we can discuss long term maintainership off line once I am back on my feet, if you like? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 24 22:20:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 18:20:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 184530] Review Request: perl-RPM2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609242220.k8OMKfhu008520@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-RPM2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=184530 ------- Additional Comments From rnorwood at redhat.com 2006-09-24 18:20 EST ------- And I didn't even have to say his name three times! Paul, is the above sufficient, or do you need to wait for the new CPAN release? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 24 22:53:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 18:53:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206989] Review Request: twinkle - A SIP Soft Phone In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609242253.k8OMr2fe009564@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: twinkle - A SIP Soft Phone https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206989 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-09-24 18:53 EST ------- ok, new version up: * Sun Sep 24 2006 Kevin Fenzi - 0.8.1-2 - Add bind-libbind-devel as a BuildRequires and link against it to fix private glibc symbols. - Add alsa-lib-devel and kdelibs-devel BuildRequires Linking against libbind instead of libresolv seems to solve all the private symbol issues. adding alsa-lib-devel adds ALSA support. adding kdelibs-devel to add KDE support. Spec URL: http://www.scrye.com/~kevin/extras/twinkle/twinkle.spec SRPM URL: http://www.scrye.com/~kevin/extras/twinkle/twinkle-0.8.1-2.fc6.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 24 23:30:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 19:30:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207805] Review Request: skey - one-time password crap In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609242330.k8ONUH1r010485@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: skey - one-time password crap https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207805 rpm at greysector.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rpm at greysector.net ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2006-09-24 19:30 EST ------- http://www.tux.org/pub/net/olaf-kirch/dontuse/linux-skey.lsm says that the license of the utils is unknown. This is clearly unacceptable for Fedora. I personally dislike the presence of the word 'crap' in package summary. What is the point of packaging this, anyway? This software seems to be ancient. Why is it located in a directory named 'dontuse'? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 24 23:59:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 19:59:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206487] Review Request: jd - A 2ch browser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609242359.k8ONxGPC011405@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jd - A 2ch browser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206487 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-09-24 19:59 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > * missing Requires: gtkmm24 > > -bash-3.1# rpm -ivh jd-170-0.1.b_060914.fc5.i386.rpm > error: Failed dependencies: > libatkmm-1.6.so.1 is needed by jd-170-0.1.b_060914.fc5.i386 > libgdkmm-2.4.so.1 is needed by jd-170-0.1.b_060914.fc5.i386 > libgtkmm-2.4.so.1 is needed by jd-170-0.1.b_060914.fc5.i386 > libpangomm-1.4.so.1 is needed by jd-170-0.1.b_060914.fc5.i386 As written in http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-0711805dd733fe3b31741e9d5236d72941a79d94 requires to satisfy libraries (in this case gtkmm24) is not needed to be written explicitly. rpmbuild automatically adds those libraries' dependency to rpm package and yum will automatically choose other rpms to satisfy libraries' dependency. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 25 03:10:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 23:10:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207761] Review Request: xpdf - A PDF file viewer for the X Window System In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609250310.k8P3A9p6017109@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xpdf - A PDF file viewer for the X Window System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207761 ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2006-09-24 23:09 EST ------- I disagree on two items: - the lang on the config files, the config files are actually in english. - While the BuildRequires: desktop-file-utils is correct, the Requires(post) and (postun) are also correct due to the scriptlet in %post and %postun (update-desktop-database is called). The icon is a definite mustfix, and I've corrected it in -20. New SRPM: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/xpdf-3.01-20.fc6.src.rpm New SPEC: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/xpdf.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 25 03:56:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 23:56:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199108] Review Request: gutenprint: Printer Drivers Package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609250356.k8P3u8UH019752@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gutenprint: Printer Drivers Package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199108 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-09-24 23:56 EST ------- kevin, Can you plz put gutenprint packages for x86_64 for fc5/fc6?? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 25 04:39:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 00:39:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199108] Review Request: gutenprint: Printer Drivers Package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609250439.k8P4dLcE021407@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gutenprint: Printer Drivers Package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199108 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-09-25 00:39 EST ------- Sure, I would be happy to... For some reason the x86_64 build isn't working for me now. I get: RPM build errors: File not found: /var/tmp/gutenprint-5.0.0-0.11.fc6-root-mockbuild/usr/lib64/ cups/filter/rastertogutenprint.5.0 Perhaps some change in core? Any ideas? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 25 04:48:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 00:48:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207805] Review Request: skey - one-time password crap In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609250448.k8P4mbKm021816@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: skey - one-time password crap https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207805 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-09-25 00:48 EST ------- There is no requirement for a URL tag; if there is no upstream home page then it would be pointless to include a URL. The word "crap" does not appear in the package's summary, just this bugzilla ticket. (Check the specfile and you'll see.) One thing that concerns me is that the software is dated 1999, the upstream tarball lives in a directory named "dontuse", and the package includes a root-owned setuid binary. I'm not competent to evaluate this software for vulnerabilities, but it would be good to know the potential exposure. However, the license (or general lack thereof) is indeed troubling, and without clarification I think this does render this package unacceptable for extras. The PAM stuff is indicated to be GPL (but carries no license statement that I can see), md5.* is public domain, and the rest is pretty much indeterminate. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 25 04:58:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 00:58:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199108] Review Request: gutenprint: Printer Drivers Package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609250458.k8P4w7R9022084@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gutenprint: Printer Drivers Package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199108 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-09-25 00:58 EST ------- rastertogutenprint.5.0 is a part of gutenprint-cups package. Its building fine on i386. Can you mock build it and check for any errors in build.log? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 25 05:13:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 01:13:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 175433] Review Request: tor - Anonymizing overlay network for TCP (The onion router) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609250513.k8P5DHY2022693@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tor - Anonymizing overlay network for TCP (The onion router) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175433 ------- Additional Comments From toshio at tiki-lounge.com 2006-09-25 01:13 EST ------- MD5Sum a1c6efad2d042b7b54da114852687df4 tor-0.1.0.15-setgroups.patch 33ce7155f545c4d30cb846d7017cc6c2 tor-0.1.1.23.tar.gz e1c9fd2bd8fb03c1f35028fbe7d19585 tor-0.1.1.23.tar.gz.asc 56c122286a73ed67308cf2864a246c7a tor.logrotate fa520d134658dc6919af24a1218b3676 tor.lsb c83c1cb67453e47bf710f899b9e58976 tor.spec 8cef32dff6452c22873846adc6041d86 tor-0.1.1.23-2.fc5x.src.rpm Cosmetic: * The gpg file is nice in that it alerts me to its presence on the upstream download site but unless I have the signing gpg key in my web of trust I'm still going to have to run around the internet verifying that the gpg signature comes from upstream and that the key that made it probably belongs to the developers by which time I've downloaded the file from the internet myself. So the case for including it is only so-so to me. (Not a blocker, though.) Rpmlint: *.src.rpm: W: tor strange-permission tor.lsb 0775 - Ignorable, this is the initscript for SysVinit. E: tor hardcoded-library-path in /usr/lib/lsb/install_initd E: tor hardcoded-library-path in /usr/lib/lsb/remove_initd - Ignorable, you're just calling chkconfig via the lsb standard names. W: tor macro-in-%changelog doc - Line 221 has a bare %doc instead of %%doc. W: tor mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs - Cosmetic. Rpmlint: tor: E: tor no-binary - Igorable as this is a meta-package. Romlint: tor-core: E: tor-core non-standard-gid /etc/tor/torrc toranon E: tor-core non-standard-gid /var/log/tor toranon E: tor-core non-standard-uid /var/lib/tor toranon E: tor-core non-standard-gid /var/lib/tor toranon - toranon is fine so these are ignorable. E: tor-core non-readable /etc/tor/torrc 0640 E: tor-core non-standard-dir-perm /var/log/tor 0730 E: tor-core non-standard-dir-perm /var/lib/tor 0700 - Should be fine as well. E: tor-core incoherent-logrotate-file /etc/logrotate.d/tor - rpmlint is confused because the package is named tor-core. This is ignorable. Rpmlint: tor-lsb: W: tor-lsb conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/rc.d/init.d/tor E: tor-lsb executable-marked-as-config-file /etc/rc.d/init.d/tor - As explained earlier, this is normal for init scripts. W: tor-lsb no-documentation - Documentation is in the main package. This is ignorable. E: tor-lsb non-standard-uid /var/run/tor toranon E: tor-lsb non-standard-gid /var/run/tor toranon - This is fine. W: tor-lsb hidden-file-or-dir /etc/tor/.have-lsb E: tor-lsb zero-length /etc/tor/.have-lsb W: tor-lsb non-conffile-in-etc /etc/tor/.have-lsb - The .have-lsb file seems to be a marker identifying which set of init scripts is installed for things like the logrotate script. So it's state of the system rather than configuration. So not marking it %config makes sense. But putting it in /var might be better than /etc. Also, is there a reason to make it hidden? If not, perhaps: /var/lib/tor/have-lsb would be better. E: tor-lsb postin-without-chkconfig /etc/rc.d/init.d/tor E: tor-lsb preun-without-chkconfig /etc/rc.d/init.d/tor - You're calling chkconfig by its lsb name, /usr/lib/lsb/install_initd so this is ignorable. W: tor-lsb incoherent-init-script-name tor - Once again, rpmlint is confused by the tor-lsb package name so this is ignorable. Good: * Source and signature matches upstream * Signature verified created by: #28988BF5: "Roger Dingledine " and is a valid signature for the source. * Package meets the Naming guidelines * License, BSD, is OSI approved and matches what is documented in the spec. * LICENSE is included in %files. * BuildRequires are listed. * Package has no locales; language files in documentation are marked with the appropriate languages. * No shared libraries. * Not relocatable. * Package owns all the directories it creates. * No duplicate files listed. * Permissions properly set. * Package has a proper %clean section. * Macros used consistently. * Package contains code. * Documentation fits comfortably into the main package. * Documentation does not affect package at runtime. * No libraries. * Not a GUI application. * Package owns all files and directories that it creates and no extraneous ones.* Scriptlets are sane. They use fedora-usermgmt to create and delete a system uid/gid. They install the tor init scripts but don't start the service. * Builds in mock on x86_64. Summary: Fixing the macro in changelog and moving /etc/tor/.have-lsb to /var/lib/tor/have_lsb are the only things I see to be fixed here. If you're okay with those changes I'll approve. I've gone through all the previous comments as well and I think there's a bit of tempest in a teapot going on here. There are some advantages to keeping the package unified. However, Enrico seems to have addressed nearly all of those with his tor meta package so that `yum install tor` does the expected thing on a default FC install with the added flexibility that installing tor-core with a different subpackage can make the package work for other init systems. There may be a more elegant way to solve the dependency problem but without any new suggestions, Enrico's approach seems to be the best we can do with what's available now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 25 05:16:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 01:16:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207853] Review Request: tclabc - A Tcl interface and a Tk GUI to the ABC notation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609250516.k8P5G2To022865@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tclabc - A Tcl interface and a Tk GUI to the ABC notation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207853 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-09-25 01:16 EST ------- {Not Official Reviewer} packaging looks ok. + Mockbuild is successfull for i386 FC6 - rpmlint on source rpm is not silent W: tclabc mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs The specfile mixes use of spaces and tabs for indentation, which is a cosmetic annoyance. Use either spaces or tabs for indentation, not both. + rpmlint on binary rpm is silent - dist tag is NOT present + Buildroot is correct + source URL is correct + BR is correct + License used is GPL + License file LICENSE is included + MD5 sum on tarball is matching upstream tarball 34dbcb0177e11888d23ca7fa2304fb17 tclabc-1.0.7.tar.gz + No duplicate files -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 25 05:19:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 01:19:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207853] Review Request: tclabc - A Tcl interface and a Tk GUI to the ABC notation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609250519.k8P5Jhpd022991@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tclabc - A Tcl interface and a Tk GUI to the ABC notation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207853 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |panemade at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-09-25 01:19 EST ------- You may like to use sed -i -e 's|\t| |g' tclabc.spec to remove that rpmlint warning -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 25 05:24:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 01:24:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199108] Review Request: gutenprint: Printer Drivers Package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609250524.k8P5OWax023205@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gutenprint: Printer Drivers Package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199108 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-09-25 01:24 EST ------- It looks like it's installing that under /usr/lib on x86_64, instead of /usr/ lib64... ;( grep rastertogutenprint.5.0 build.log: /bin/sh ../../libtool --mode=install /usr/bin/install -c 'rastertogutenprint.5.0' '/var/tmp/gutenprint-5.0.0-0.11.fc6-root-mockbuild/usr/ lib/cups/filter/rastertogutenprint.5.0' /usr/bin/install -c .libs/rastertogutenprint.5.0 /var/tmp/gutenprint-5.0.0- 0.11.fc6-root-mockbuild/usr/lib/cups/filter/rastertogutenprint.5.0 extracting debug info from /var/tmp/gutenprint-5.0.0-0.11.fc6-root-mockbuild/ usr/lib/cups/filter/rastertogutenprint.5.0 error: File not found: /var/tmp/gutenprint-5.0.0-0.11.fc6-root-mockbuild/usr/ lib64/cups/filter/rastertogutenprint.5.0 File not found: /var/tmp/gutenprint-5.0.0-0.11.fc6-root-mockbuild/usr/lib64/ cups/filter/rastertogutenprint.5.0 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 25 05:30:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 01:30:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207839] Review Request: lush - An object-oriented Lisp interpreter and compiler In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609250530.k8P5U6VM023390@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lush - An object-oriented Lisp interpreter and compiler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207839 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |panemade at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-09-25 01:30 EST ------- {Not Official Reviewer} - Mockbuild is Failed for i386 FC6 unix.c:1072: warning: ignoring return value of 'fgets', declared with attribute warn_unused_result gcc -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m32 -march=i386 -mtune=generic -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DNO_DEBUG -Wall -O3 -march=i686 -mmmx -msse -I../include -pthread -I/usr/include/freetype2 -c dldbfd.c dldbfd.c: In function 'init_global_symbol_table': dldbfd.c:686: error: too few arguments to function 'bfd_hash_table_init' dldbfd.c: In function 'link_archive_members': dldbfd.c:2725: error: too few arguments to function 'bfd_hash_table_init' dldbfd.c: In function 'dld_find_executable': dldbfd.c:3188: warning: ignoring return value of 'getcwd', declared with attribute warn_unused_result make[1]: *** [dldbfd.o] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/lush-1.2/src' make: *** [all] Error 2 error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.32198 (%build) - rpmlint on source rpm is not silent W: tclabc mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs The specfile mixes use of spaces and tabs for indentation, which is a cosmetic annoyance. Use either spaces or tabs for indentation, not both. Use sed -i -e 's|\t| |g' lush.spec to remove that rpmlint warning + dist tag is present + Buildroot is correct + source URL is correct + License used is GPL + License file COPYING is included + MD5 sum on tarball is matching upstream tarball 95010c360350bf0a489ddb4d4cfa089f lush-1.2.tar.gz -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 25 05:49:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 01:49:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199108] Review Request: gutenprint: Printer Drivers Package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609250549.k8P5ndsG024092@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gutenprint: Printer Drivers Package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199108 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-09-25 01:49 EST ------- when i check RPMMacros wiki page i found %{_libdir} extracts to /usr/lib only not /usr/lib64 as %{_lib} evaluates to lib do we need separate SPEC or there is some trick to make same SPEC work on x86_64 arch?? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 25 06:42:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 02:42:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 175433] Review Request: tor - Anonymizing overlay network for TCP (The onion router) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609250642.k8P6gsc6026232@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tor - Anonymizing overlay network for TCP (The onion router) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175433 ------- Additional Comments From enrico.scholz at informatik.tu-chemnitz.de 2006-09-25 02:42 EST ------- thx * Mon Sep 25 2006 Enrico Scholz - 0.1.1.23-3 - removed '.have-lsb' and related logic in logrotate script; check for existence of the corresponding initscript instead of - fixed bare '%' in changelog section http://ensc.de/fedora/tor/ ======== > * The gpg file is nice in that it alerts me to its presence on the > upstream download site but unless I have the signing gpg key in my > web of trust... it's an habit from old fedora.us days. But I think a good one; being in somebody's web-trust is not so difficultly as your comment suggests. E.g. signer of tor is verified in my trustdb > W: tor mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs rpmlint bug; seems to be triggered by | sed -i -e '... | +'... which happens due to indentation reasons > W: tor-lsb hidden-file-or-dir /etc/tor/.have-lsb > E: tor-lsb zero-length /etc/tor/.have-lsb > W: tor-lsb non-conffile-in-etc /etc/tor/.have-lsb > - The .have-lsb file seems to be a marker identifying which set of init > scripts is installed for things like the logrotate script. So it's state > of the system rather than configuration. So not marking it %config makes > sense. But putting it in /var might be better than /etc. Also, is there > a reason to make it hidden? If not, perhaps: /var/lib/tor/have-lsb would > be better. I removed the '.have-XXX' stuff completely. But '/var/lib/tor' would have been a bad place because the have-XXX files are files used directly by 'root' while '/var/lib/tor' is owned by 'toranon'. Nevertheless, should not be an issue anymore. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 25 06:49:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 02:49:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207761] Review Request: xpdf - A PDF file viewer for the X Window System In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609250649.k8P6njne026497@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xpdf - A PDF file viewer for the X Window System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207761 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-09-25 02:49 EST ------- (In reply to comment #9) > I disagree on two items: > > - the lang on the config files, the config files are actually in english. Indeed, but the %lang, if I'm not wrong tells which files are interesting for which language, not the language of the file. Anyway putting %lang here would certainly unnecessarily clutter the spec, so do what you prefer. In fact proposed that because they were previously in such a place that they had a %lang, not because I care a lot about this kind of stuff. > - While the BuildRequires: desktop-file-utils is correct, the Requires(post) and > (postun) are also correct due to the scriptlet in %post and %postun > (update-desktop-database is called). This has changed in the guidelines, to avoid Requires bloat, quoting (you? ;-): "Note: For FC5+, this scriptlet follows the same convention as mimeinfo files and gtk-icon-cache. Namely, the spec file should not Require desktop-file-utils for this." -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 25 06:59:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 02:59:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 184530] Review Request: perl-RPM2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609250659.k8P6x0oA026864@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-RPM2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=184530 paul at city-fan.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO_REPORTER |ASSIGNED OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-09-25 02:58 EST ------- I'm happy to approve this now, but is Jason still around to maintain it? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 25 07:11:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 03:11:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207806] Review Request: evolution-bogofilter - A plugin for bogofilter support in evolution In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609250711.k8P7BgCQ027382@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: evolution-bogofilter - A plugin for bogofilter support in evolution https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207806 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-09-25 03:11 EST ------- similar error i found in mock build on i386 Using config source xml:merged:/etc/gconf/gconf.xml.defaults for schema installation Using $(sysconfdir)/gconf/schemas as install directory for schema files checking for BF_EPLUGIN... configure: error: Package requirements ( glib-2.0 evolution-plugin-2.8 camel-provider-1.2 gconf-2.0 ) were not met: Package camel-provider-1.2 was not found in the pkg-config search path. Perhaps you should add the directory containing `camel-provider-1.2.pc' to the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable Package 'camel-provider-1.2', required by 'evolution-plugin', not found Consider adjusting the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable if you installed software in a non-standard prefix. Alternatively, you may set the environment variables BF_EPLUGIN_CFLAGS and BF_EPLUGIN_LIBS to avoid the need to call pkg-config. See the pkg-config man page for more details. error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.35379 (%build) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 25 07:16:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 03:16:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207761] Review Request: xpdf - A PDF file viewer for the X Window System In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609250716.k8P7G1lM027596@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xpdf - A PDF file viewer for the X Window System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207761 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-09-25 03:15 EST ------- I have spotted other minor issues (will there be an end? ;-): * there are some cp -rf in my opinion it should better be cp -pr * in xpdf.desktop, there is an hardcoded category X-Red-Hat-Base which certainly shouldn't be there. Last a comment: the Group seems very strange to me for a viewer, but it seems to be the tradition (I do that too), and indeed there is no alternative that looks better. Besides Group isn't important. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 25 07:19:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 03:19:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206487] Review Request: jd - A 2ch browser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609250719.k8P7JSdc027797@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jd - A 2ch browser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206487 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2006-09-25 03:19 EST ------- With yum, yes it will be pulled. But installing by hand, like I did, the normal user can't guess which package he/she needs. ps: it's the same case as gputils in ktechlab. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 25 07:35:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 03:35:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206693] Review Request: KTechlab - Development and simulation of microcontrollers and electronic circuits In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609250735.k8P7ZjLn029050@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: KTechlab - Development and simulation of microcontrollers and electronic circuits https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206693 ------- Additional Comments From aportal at univ-montp2.fr 2006-09-25 03:35 EST ------- gpsim built is OK. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 25 08:04:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 04:04:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193867] Review Request: klamav - Clam Anti-Virus on the KDE Desktop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609250804.k8P845RG032394@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: klamav - Clam Anti-Virus on the KDE Desktop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193867 ------- Additional Comments From andy at smile.org.ua 2006-09-25 04:04 EST ------- Sorry for later answer, I was busy by my work. About debuginfo package. I have no ideas to it. Why rpmlint complains to *.[ch] files? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 25 08:11:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 04:11:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207896] New: Review Request: astyle - Source code formatter Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207896 Summary: Review Request: astyle - Source code formatter Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mefoster at gmail.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www6.informatik.tu-muenchen.de/~foster/extras/astyle.spec SRPM URL: http://www6.informatik.tu-muenchen.de/~foster/extras/astyle-1.19-1.src.rpm Description: Artistic Style is a source code indenter, source code formatter, and source code beautifier for the C, C++, C# and Java programming languages. The project homepage is http://astyle.sourceforge.net/. NB: I'm still waiting for a response from the developer about whether he's okay with this being packaged, but I figured I'd get the review process started anyway. This is my first package, and I am looking for a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 25 08:13:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 04:13:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207805] Review Request: skey - An S/Key implementation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609250813.k8P8D8bb000714@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: skey - An S/Key implementation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207805 dwmw2 at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: skey - one- |Review Request: skey - An |time password crap |S/Key implementation ------- Additional Comments From dwmw2 at redhat.com 2006-09-25 04:12 EST ------- Hm, I hadn't noticed the 'unknown' bit in the lsm file -- this is derived from a package we've had internally for years. I'll ask Olaf about it. Since the main use for it is the s/key _client_, I could usefully split the setuid 'skeyinit' and other bits into a separate subpackage -- in fact I don't even care whether we ship those or not. Yes, the software's ancient. Nevertheless, some misguided IT departments still deploy it, such that using the s/key client is the only way to SSH into the company network. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 25 08:13:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 04:13:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206487] Review Request: jd - A 2ch browser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609250813.k8P8DcTi000780@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jd - A 2ch browser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206487 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-09-25 04:13 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > With yum, yes it will be pulled. > > But installing by hand, like I did, the normal user can't guess which package > he/she needs. It may be, however, this is already true for other packages. You can see this by 'rpm -q --whatrequires firefox', for example. Lots of X related requirement are specified by only library dependency. > > ps: it's the same case as gputils in ktechlab. That is not true. For Ktechlab case, the requirement gputils is added because the dependency for gputils is not checked by library dependency but it requires binaries. in gputils as ktechlab tries to call the binaries. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 25 08:31:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 04:31:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207532] Review Request: kbackup - Back up your data in a simple, user friendly way In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609250831.k8P8Votu002476@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kbackup - Back up your data in a simple, user friendly way https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207532 ------- Additional Comments From aportal at univ-montp2.fr 2006-09-25 04:31 EST ------- Spec URL: http://linuxelectronique.free.fr/download/fedora/5/SPECS/kbackup.spec SRPM URL: http://linuxelectronique.free.fr/download/fedora/5/SRPMS/kbackup-0.5-1.src.rpm %changelog * Mon Sep 25 2006 Alain Portal 0.5-1 - New upstream version - Update patch0 and patch1 - Remove patch2 that is no more needed * Mon Sep 25 2006 Alain Portal 0.4.2-4 - Requires(post,postun) desktop-file-utils no more needed since FC-5 - Add %%post an %%postun for icons - Remove absolute symlinks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 25 08:35:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 04:35:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207532] Review Request: kbackup - Back up your data in a simple, user friendly way In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609250835.k8P8ZVaw002762@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kbackup - Back up your data in a simple, user friendly way https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207532 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-09-25 04:35 EST ------- I will review this later. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 25 08:44:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 04:44:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206487] Review Request: jd - A 2ch browser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609250844.k8P8iTDx003753@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jd - A 2ch browser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206487 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-09-25 04:44 EST ------- Well, upstream has updated source and changed versioning, so will you check the following? http://www.ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~mtasaka/dist/extras/development/SRPMS/jd-1.7.0-0.1.rc060921.src.rpm http://www.ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~mtasaka/dist/extras/development/SPECS/jd.spec ( I have not added gtkmm24 for Requires) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 25 08:51:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 04:51:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207805] Review Request: skey - An S/Key implementation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609250851.k8P8pB3m004298@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: skey - An S/Key implementation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207805 ------- Additional Comments From dwmw2 at redhat.com 2006-09-25 04:50 EST ------- The skey files come from Wietse Venema's logdaemon package, where they are described thus: These files are modified versions of the s/key files found on thumper.bellcore.com at 21 oct 1993. They have been fixed to run on SunOS 4.1.3, Solaris 2.3, Ultrix 4.3 and 44BSD. The original files are still present, with a "-" tacked onto their name. The MD4 and MD5 source code was taken from the NRL S/Key distribution on thumper on Sept 21 1994. This version is byte-order independent. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 25 09:11:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 05:11:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207805] Review Request: skey - An S/Key implementation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609250911.k8P9BLRs005719@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: skey - An S/Key implementation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207805 ------- Additional Comments From dwmw2 at redhat.com 2006-09-25 05:11 EST ------- RFC1760 describes the original MD4-based s/key implementation, and states that the original implementation was released "for public use". RFC2289 describes the generic version supporting also MD5 and SHA1. This package supports only MD5. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 25 09:53:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 05:53:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207473] Review Request: ruby-activerecord - Implements the ActiveRecord pattern for ORM In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609250953.k8P9rR0h008361@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-activerecord - Implements the ActiveRecord pattern for ORM https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207473 ------- Additional Comments From k.georgiou at imperial.ac.uk 2006-09-25 05:53 EST ------- Is active_support really required? I don't see anything in the code that uses it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 25 10:32:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 06:32:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207532] Review Request: kbackup - Back up your data in a simple, user friendly way In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609251032.k8PAWmm3010854@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kbackup - Back up your data in a simple, user friendly way https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207532 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-09-25 06:32 EST ------- First review of this package. 1. From http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines : * Use rpmlint - rpmlint is not silent. //usr/share/applications/kde/kbackup.desktop: error: required key "Encoding" not found E: kbackup invalid-desktopfile //usr/share/applications/kde/kbackup.desktop This is perhaps because kbackup.desktop doesn't have the entry of Encoding=UTF-8. * Desktop files - Well, in GNOME I can see two desktop entries of KBackup under "system tools". Perhaps either desktop file should have "OnlyShowIn=KDE;" entry and the other "OnlyShowIn=GNOME;" * File and Directory Ownership The following directries are owned by other packages and should not be owned by this package. /usr/share/applications/kde /usr/share/icons/hicolor /usr/share/icons/hicolor/16x16 /usr/share/icons/hicolor/16x16/apps /usr/share/icons/hicolor/16x16/mimetypes /usr/share/icons/hicolor/32x32 /usr/share/icons/hicolor/32x32/apps /usr/share/icons/hicolor/32x32/mimetypes 2. From http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines : = Nothing. 3. Other things I have noticed: * I recommend that %configure is moved to %build stage. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 25 11:25:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 07:25:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206266] Review Request: transmission - lightweight GTK+ BitTorrent client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609251125.k8PBPv6h014694@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: transmission - lightweight GTK+ BitTorrent client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206266 ------- Additional Comments From denis at poolshark.org 2006-09-25 07:25 EST ------- Thanks for the review :-). Your points addressed below: 1. Fixed. 2. update-desktop-database calls fixed! The desktop-file-install looks good to me. It doesn't have the --add-category Fedora option since the category is already present in the desktop file (which is embedded into the spec). Many packages embed the desktop file into the spec directly, while others check it into CVS and add it as an extra Source: line. I'm not sure if one way is preferred over the other... 3. The use of %makeinstall here is intentional. Transmission does not use autoconf/automake and therefore does not honor DESTDIR, but rather uses a custom makefile system. My understanding was that %makeinstall is targeted at cases like this one, i.e. because it provides more variable definitions, more than what is usually needed for autoconf/automake... ? http://www.poolshark.org/src/transmission-0.6.1-2.src.rpm http://www.poolshark.org/src/transmission.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 25 11:40:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 07:40:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207532] Review Request: kbackup - Back up your data in a simple, user friendly way In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609251140.k8PBekNa016032@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kbackup - Back up your data in a simple, user friendly way https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207532 ------- Additional Comments From aportal at univ-montp2.fr 2006-09-25 07:40 EST ------- (In reply to comment #7) > * Desktop files > - Well, in GNOME I can see two desktop entries of KBackup under > "system tools". Perhaps either desktop file should have > "OnlyShowIn=KDE;" entry and the other "OnlyShowIn=GNOME;" If I add "OnlyShowIn=KDE;", that means the desktop entry won't be in Gnome menu? (I'm using kde and I have only one entry in Utilities->File) Perhaps should I have to remove "System;" from Categories? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 25 11:55:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 07:55:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196669] Review Request: filesystem-i18n In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609251155.k8PBtTIR017330@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: filesystem-i18n https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196669 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-09-25 07:55 EST ------- Re: comment #15 > Any chance to get this into Fedora Core 6 I was under the impression this was what Bill had in mind, but I won't put words in his mouth. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 25 13:22:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 09:22:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207607] Review Request: telepathy-butterfly - MSN connection manager for Telepathy In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609251322.k8PDMfRB023705@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: telepathy-butterfly - MSN connection manager for Telepathy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207607 sander at hoentjen.eu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |sander at hoentjen.eu -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 25 13:23:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 09:23:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207173] Review Request: pymsn - Python libraries for MSN Messenger network In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609251323.k8PDNE2t023778@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pymsn - Python libraries for MSN Messenger network https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207173 sander at hoentjen.eu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |sander at hoentjen.eu -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 25 13:26:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 09:26:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207532] Review Request: kbackup - Back up your data in a simple, user friendly way In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609251326.k8PDQ46x024009@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kbackup - Back up your data in a simple, user friendly way https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207532 ------- Additional Comments From aportal at univ-montp2.fr 2006-09-25 09:25 EST ------- Spec URL: http://linuxelectronique.free.fr/download/fedora/5/SPECS/kbackup.spec SRPM URL: http://linuxelectronique.free.fr/download/fedora/5/SRPMS/kbackup-0.5-2.src.rpm %changelog * Mon Sep 25 2006 Alain Portal 0.5-2 - Use macro for make - Don't own some directories - Update patch0 and patch1 - Improve desktop-file installation -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 25 13:27:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 09:27:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207607] Review Request: telepathy-butterfly - MSN connection manager for Telepathy In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609251327.k8PDRhEP024238@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: telepathy-butterfly - MSN connection manager for Telepathy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207607 sander at hoentjen.eu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 25 13:28:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 09:28:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207173] Review Request: pymsn - Python libraries for MSN Messenger network In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609251328.k8PDSpZl024375@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pymsn - Python libraries for MSN Messenger network https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207173 sander at hoentjen.eu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 25 13:30:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 09:30:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207927] New: Review Request: supertuxkart - Kids 3D go-kart racing game featuring Tux Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207927 Summary: Review Request: supertuxkart - Kids 3D go-kart racing game featuring Tux Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/supertuxkart.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/supertuxkart-0.2-1.src.rpm Description: 3D go-kart racing game for kids with several famous OpenSource mascots participating. Race as Tux against 3 computer players in many different fun race courses (Standard race track, Dessert, Mathclass, etc). Full information on how to add your own race courses is included. During the race you can pick up powerups such as: (homing) missiles, magnets and portable zippers. --- Notice that this really is nothing more then a new version of tuxkart, but since tuxkart upstream is sorta dead, a group of developers has brought out their new version under a new name called supertuxkart. After some discussion on f-e-l it was decided that it was best to create a new CVS branch for this new named version and thus a (Re-)Review Since this thus essentially is not a new package (mearly a rename) I would like to request a "quick" review whatever that may mean :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 25 13:46:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 09:46:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 186452] Review Request: kdebluetooth: The KDE Bluetooth Framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609251346.k8PDkW5U025957@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdebluetooth: The KDE Bluetooth Framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=186452 ------- Additional Comments From dennis at ausil.us 2006-09-25 09:46 EST ------- I dug into this a little with rawhide selinux execution of kbluepin is blocked. I didnt try messing around setting up a selinux policy to make it work however i did discover that KDE is not running the things in /etc/xdg/autostart/ that its supposed to in /etc/xdg/autostart/bluez-pin.desktop it executes bluez-pin --dbus which if i ran that i got the default pin helper to work. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 25 13:48:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 09:48:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 173459] Review Request: initng In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609251348.k8PDmWkH026101@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 ------- Additional Comments From daner964 at student.liu.se 2006-09-25 09:48 EST ------- So this means I'm free to commit initng against FE svn and request a build? That's good news indeed! Another completely different questions to the folks here: I just noticed that I had a process nash-hotplug running 100% all the time. Is this something init(ng) is supposed to kill? I find some rows in rc.sysinit which seems to do this... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 25 14:10:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 10:10:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207532] Review Request: kbackup - Back up your data in a simple, user friendly way In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609251410.k8PEAeOs027708@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kbackup - Back up your data in a simple, user friendly way https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207532 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-09-25 10:10 EST ------- * Well, currently in GNOME only one menu appears for kbackup, however, my opinion is "OnlyShowIn=KDE;" should be in /usr/share/applications/kde/kbackup.desktop, not in /usr/share/applications/fedora-kbackup.desktop. I can see that /usr/share/applications/kde/kresources.desktop (in kdelibs) has the entry "OnlyShowIn=KDE;". * Another thing: /usr/share/applications/kde/kbackup.desktop has X-SuSE-Backup in Category, this should be changed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 25 14:33:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 10:33:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207839] Review Request: lush - An object-oriented Lisp interpreter and compiler In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609251433.k8PEXNdl029661@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lush - An object-oriented Lisp interpreter and compiler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207839 ------- Additional Comments From gemi at bluewin.ch 2006-09-25 10:33 EST ------- Now builds in FC6 mock (this SRPM will not work on FC5). Spaces/Tab fixed. http://math.ifi.unizh.ch/fedora/5/i386/SRPMS.gemi/lush-1.2-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 25 14:41:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 10:41:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207532] Review Request: kbackup - Back up your data in a simple, user friendly way In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609251441.k8PEfe2D030467@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kbackup - Back up your data in a simple, user friendly way https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207532 ------- Additional Comments From aportal at univ-montp2.fr 2006-09-25 10:41 EST ------- Spec URL: http://linuxelectronique.free.fr/download/fedora/5/SPECS/kbackup.spec SRPM URL: http://linuxelectronique.free.fr/download/fedora/5/SRPMS/kbackup-0.5-3.src.rpm %changelog * Mon Sep 25 2006 Alain Portal 0.5-3 - desktop-file-install don't work as I expected, so update patch0 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 25 15:14:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 11:14:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206842] Review Request: seq24 - Real-time MIDI sequencer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609251514.k8PFE9xM000590@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: seq24 - Real-time MIDI sequencer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206842 ------- Additional Comments From green at redhat.com 2006-09-25 11:14 EST ------- These updated bits take care of comment #4 and comment #5. Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/green/FE/devel/seq24.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/green/FE/devel/seq24-0.8.7-4.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 25 15:15:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 11:15:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207761] Review Request: xpdf - A PDF file viewer for the X Window System In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609251515.k8PFF6e3000708@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xpdf - A PDF file viewer for the X Window System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207761 ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2006-09-25 11:14 EST ------- OK. Group is a throwaway, it matches Evince and there is nothing better to set it to. Everything else is fixed in -21. New SRPM: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/xpdf-3.01-21.fc6.src.rpm New SPEC: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/xpdf.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 25 15:17:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 11:17:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207806] Review Request: evolution-bogofilter - A plugin for bogofilter support in evolution In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609251517.k8PFHnfD000897@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: evolution-bogofilter - A plugin for bogofilter support in evolution https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207806 ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2006-09-25 11:17 EST ------- Fixed in -2: New SRPM: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/evolution-bogofilter-0.2.0-2.fc6.src.rpm New SPEC: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/evolution-bogofilter.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 25 15:26:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 11:26:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207532] Review Request: kbackup - Back up your data in a simple, user friendly way In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609251526.k8PFQnFM002003@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kbackup - Back up your data in a simple, user friendly way https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207532 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-09-25 11:26 EST ------- I am pleased to say that this package is now APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 25 15:30:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 11:30:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207532] Review Request: kbackup - Back up your data in a simple, user friendly way In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609251530.k8PFUkVR002745@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kbackup - Back up your data in a simple, user friendly way https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207532 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-09-25 11:30 EST ------- FYI, you shouldn't have 2 .desktop files, I'd recommend changing mkdir -p %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/applications desktop-file-install --vendor fedora \ --dir %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/applications \ --add-category "Utility" \ --add-category "X-KDE-Utilities-File" \ --add-category "X-Fedora" \ --remove-only-show-in "KDE" \ src/%{name}.desktop -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 25 15:32:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 11:32:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207532] Review Request: kbackup - Back up your data in a simple, user friendly way In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609251532.k8PFWqKZ003088@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kbackup - Back up your data in a simple, user friendly way https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207532 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-09-25 11:32 EST ------- And, # Fix absolute symlink %{__rm} -f %{buildroot}%{_docdir}/HTML/*/%{name}/common you remove the symlink, but then don't ever actually replace/fix it. Either fix it to be a relative symlink or leave as is. Else, you'll end up with broken help links. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 25 15:35:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 11:35:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207532] Review Request: kbackup - Back up your data in a simple, user friendly way In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609251535.k8PFZCRq003376@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kbackup - Back up your data in a simple, user friendly way https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207532 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-09-25 11:34 EST ------- Crap, my comment #13 got truncated, it was *supposed* to say change to desktop-file-install --vendor="" \ --dir %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/applications/kde \ --add-category="Utility" \ --add-category="X-KDE-Utilities-File" \ --add-category="X-Fedora" \ --remove-only-show-in "KDE" \ %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/applications/kde/*.desktop -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 25 15:37:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 11:37:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207761] Review Request: xpdf - A PDF file viewer for the X Window System In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609251537.k8PFbDPZ003675@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xpdf - A PDF file viewer for the X Window System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207761 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-09-25 11:37 EST ------- (In reply to comment #12) > OK. Group is a throwaway, it matches Evince and there is nothing better to set > it to. Indeed. I also use that group for example for xchm which is even more wrong in my opinion. Everything seems fine to me now, but I am not the reviewer ;-). I had a look at the gcc warnings, most of them seems not worrying, however I spotted some warnings like: warning: 'tpgrCXPtr1$x' may be used uninitialized in this function certainly not a blocker for inclusion in extras, but maybe something to be reported upstream, if somebody feels like it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 25 15:49:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 11:49:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207761] Review Request: xpdf - A PDF file viewer for the X Window System In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609251549.k8PFn09p005040@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xpdf - A PDF file viewer for the X Window System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207761 ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-09-25 11:48 EST ------- Patrice, if you're happy with the package, feel free to take over the review and approve it. I ran into some time issues and couldn't get to it this weekend. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 25 15:53:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 11:53:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207532] Review Request: kbackup - Back up your data in a simple, user friendly way In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609251553.k8PFrMHD005399@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kbackup - Back up your data in a simple, user friendly way https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207532 ------- Additional Comments From aportal at univ-montp2.fr 2006-09-25 11:53 EST ------- (In reply to comment #14) > And, > # Fix absolute symlink > %{__rm} -f %{buildroot}%{_docdir}/HTML/*/%{name}/common > > you remove the symlink, but then don't ever actually replace/fix it. Either > fix it to be a relative symlink or leave as is. Else, you'll end up with > broken help links. Please, could you tell me how to fix? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 25 16:04:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 12:04:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207532] Review Request: kbackup - Back up your data in a simple, user friendly way In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609251604.k8PG4TXS006334@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kbackup - Back up your data in a simple, user friendly way https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207532 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-09-25 12:04 EST ------- (In reply to comment #16) > (In reply to comment #14) > > And, > > # Fix absolute symlink > > %{__rm} -f %{buildroot}%{_docdir}/HTML/*/%{name}/common > > > > you remove the symlink, but then don't ever actually replace/fix it. Either > > fix it to be a relative symlink or leave as is. Else, you'll end up with > > broken help links. > > Please, could you tell me how to fix? > Simply not removing %{buildroot}%{_docdir}/HTML/*/%{name}/common is the easiest idea to follow the recommendation from Rex. I don't complain for it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 25 16:14:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 12:14:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207725] Review Request: sshfp - Generate SSHFP DNS records from knownhosts files or ssh-keyscan In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609251614.k8PGEvQ5007116@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sshfp - Generate SSHFP DNS records from knownhosts files or ssh-keyscan https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207725 ------- Additional Comments From paul at xelerance.com 2006-09-25 12:14 EST ------- Okay. I guess I agree this discussion should move to the openssh-clients package. * Mon Sep 25 2006 Paul Wouters - 1.0.6-2 - Don't change VerifyHostKeyDNS in /etc/ssh/ssh_config anymore -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 25 16:20:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 12:20:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207896] Review Request: astyle - Source code formatter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609251620.k8PGKajN007874@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: astyle - Source code formatter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207896 ------- Additional Comments From mefoster at gmail.com 2006-09-25 12:20 EST ------- p.s. -- Just heard back from the developer, and he's fine with this being in Extras. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 25 16:30:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 12:30:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 184530] Review Request: perl-RPM2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609251630.k8PGUqU7008927@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-RPM2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=184530 ------- Additional Comments From rnorwood at redhat.com 2006-09-25 12:30 EST ------- No, he isn't. I'm maintaining most of the perl* packages for FC and RHEL, so I could take it if no-one else wants it. I'll send a quick mail to fedora-perl-devel to see if anyone else wants it first, though. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 25 16:38:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 12:38:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207532] Review Request: kbackup - Back up your data in a simple, user friendly way In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609251638.k8PGc64g009753@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kbackup - Back up your data in a simple, user friendly way https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207532 ------- Additional Comments From aportal at univ-montp2.fr 2006-09-25 12:38 EST ------- I found two desktop entries in my menu - one in "System" - one in "Utilities->File" It seems to me that the better place is "Utilities->File". To remove the one in "System", I think that I have to remove "System" from the categories field in desktop. But if I do that, it seems to me there won't be any entry in a GNOME menu. Is there a GNOME category similar to "X-KDE-Utilities-File"? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 25 16:59:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 12:59:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207532] Review Request: kbackup - Back up your data in a simple, user friendly way In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609251659.k8PGxYp4012441@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kbackup - Back up your data in a simple, user friendly way https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207532 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-09-25 12:59 EST ------- Well, if it is complicated to unify desktop files, I think owing two desktop files is not so bad idea. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 25 17:01:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 13:01:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207532] Review Request: kbackup - Back up your data in a simple, user friendly way In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609251701.k8PH14QX012633@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kbackup - Back up your data in a simple, user friendly way https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207532 ------- Additional Comments From aportal at univ-montp2.fr 2006-09-25 13:01 EST ------- Spec URL: http://linuxelectronique.free.fr/download/fedora/5/SPECS/kbackup.spec SRPM URL: http://linuxelectronique.free.fr/download/fedora/5/SRPMS/kbackup-0.5-4.src.rpm %changelog * Mon Sep 25 2006 Alain Portal 0.5-4 - Install only one desktop file - Don't remove absolute symlinks - Update patch0 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 25 17:02:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 13:02:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207763] Review Request: ddd - GUI for several command-line debuggers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609251702.k8PH2xqn012851@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ddd - GUI for several command-line debuggers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207763 ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2006-09-25 13:02 EST ------- Fixed up in -9: New SRPM: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/ddd-3.3.11-9.fc6.src.rpm New SPEC: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/ddd.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 25 17:12:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 13:12:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207532] Review Request: kbackup - Back up your data in a simple, user friendly way In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609251712.k8PHCfvY013580@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kbackup - Back up your data in a simple, user friendly way https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207532 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-09-25 13:12 EST ------- (In reply to comment #20) > Spec URL: > http://linuxelectronique.free.fr/download/fedora/5/SPECS/kbackup.spec > SRPM URL: > http://linuxelectronique.free.fr/download/fedora/5/SRPMS/kbackup-0.5-4.src.rpm > > %changelog > * Mon Sep 25 2006 Alain Portal 0.5-4 > - Install only one desktop file > - Don't remove absolute symlinks > - Update patch0 This time, in GNOME desktop entry appears on "accessory". For KDE, where does the entry for KBackup appear? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 25 17:40:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 13:40:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189889] Review Request: vkeybd - Virtual MIDI Keyboard In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609251740.k8PHegtC015733@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vkeybd - Virtual MIDI Keyboard https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189889 ------- Additional Comments From green at redhat.com 2006-09-25 13:40 EST ------- (In reply to comment #13) > - please do not use a full path in the .desktop file in the Exec line because > this make the path to the binary hardcoded. Fixed. > - there are some warnings in build.log in mock: sffile.c:122: warning: ignoring > return value of 'fread', declared with attribute warn_unused_result - see them > all in the attachment. I'll let upstream know. > - ChangeLog is not packaged Fixed. > - did you ask upstream to include your icon / desktop files? There is already an > desktop file in the upstream tarball, so maybe upstream will include your > improved desktop file. I'll do that. > - the lash patch does not patch the README properly(LADCCA is still mentioned): > > - --ladcca bool > + --lash bool > Specify the support of LADCCA. Give yes or no as the Fixed. > - the manpage does not mention the --lash option (the upstream version not the > --ladcca option) I'll report upstream. > - have you submitted lash patch to upstream? (Just out of curiosity, what are > the advantages of lash against ladcca? LADCCA is dead. LASH is the new LADCCA. > - some files have strange permissions, but I don't know whether or not this > needs to be fixed: > $ rpm -vql vkeybd | grep -- -r--r--r > -r--r--r-- 1 root root 2278 Sep 19 23:41 > /usr/share/man/man1/vkeybd.1.gz Fixed. > -r--r--r-- 1 root root 5765 Sep 19 23:41 > /usr/share/vkeybd/vkeybd.list > -r--r--r-- 1 root root 282 Sep 19 23:41 > /usr/share/vkeybd/vkeybdmap > -r--r--r-- 1 root root 590 Sep 19 23:41 > /usr/share/vkeybd/vkeybdmap-german I didn't change these. > - changing %{_datadir}/vkeybd to %{_datadir}/vkeybd/ in %files makes it more > obvious that an directory is meant Done. I also updated the .desktop file as per comment #14. Updated bits here: Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/green/FE/FC5/vkeybd.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/green/FE/FC5/vkeybd-0.1.17-8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 25 17:46:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 13:46:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 173459] Review Request: initng In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609251746.k8PHkXvA016131@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 ------- Additional Comments From daner964 at student.liu.se 2006-09-25 13:46 EST ------- Also, I noticed that I'm suddenly not member of cvsextras anymore (which I was when I looked a few hours ago). I don't really know what went wrong this time, but I guess I need someone to sponsor me again... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 25 17:47:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 13:47:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207532] Review Request: kbackup - Back up your data in a simple, user friendly way In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609251747.k8PHlUx0016228@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kbackup - Back up your data in a simple, user friendly way https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207532 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-09-25 13:47 EST ------- Well, if desktop entry appears in "Utilities->File" on KDE as you have expected, please go ahead (i.e. import to cvs). I don't stop you from commiting this package to cvs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 25 17:50:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 13:50:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207761] Review Request: xpdf - A PDF file viewer for the X Window System In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609251750.k8PHoQeb016453@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xpdf - A PDF file viewer for the X Window System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207761 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|jkeating at redhat.com |pertusus at free.fr ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-09-25 13:50 EST ------- The sources are not right for the lang packages. It seems that these are not the latest versions that are used. In my opinion it would be much better to have the real files and not the ftp links that points to the versionned files as source files. This would have the added benefit to have different files with different names in the look-aside cache. I made a patch to test the rpm build with the language files really present, and it seems that the patches have to be updated... I'll attach a quick spec file diff with the real source file names, but you'll have to update the patches ;-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 25 17:51:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 13:51:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207761] Review Request: xpdf - A PDF file viewer for the X Window System In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609251751.k8PHpnrX016553@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xpdf - A PDF file viewer for the X Window System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207761 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-09-25 13:51 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=137074) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=137074&action=view) use versionned source files in ftp -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 25 17:53:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 13:53:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 173459] Review Request: initng In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609251753.k8PHr7GL016724@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-09-25 13:53 EST ------- (In reply to comment #338) > Also, I noticed that I'm suddenly not member of cvsextras anymore (which I was > when I looked a few hours ago). I don't really know what went wrong this time, > but I guess I need someone to sponsor me again... Some accounts were removed from cvsextras recently, as described here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/RemovedFromCvsextras Ask on fedora-extras-list about getting cvsextras membership back. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 25 18:04:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 14:04:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207761] Review Request: xpdf - A PDF file viewer for the X Window System In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609251804.k8PI4iKx017604@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xpdf - A PDF file viewer for the X Window System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207761 ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2006-09-25 14:04 EST ------- Fixed in -22: New SRPM: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/xpdf-3.01-22.fc6.src.rpm New SPEC: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/xpdf.spec Anything else? :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 25 18:11:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 14:11:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 175433] Review Request: tor - Anonymizing overlay network for TCP (The onion router) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609251811.k8PIBLs9018089@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tor - Anonymizing overlay network for TCP (The onion router) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175433 toshio at tiki-lounge.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From toshio at tiki-lounge.com 2006-09-25 14:10 EST ------- MD5Sum 2d861e91e45a709acd921f26214319c1 tor-0.1.1.23-3.fc5x.src.rpm Both issues raised before have been fixed. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 25 18:32:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 14:32:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207761] Review Request: xpdf - A PDF file viewer for the X Window System In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609251832.k8PIW4AJ020034@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xpdf - A PDF file viewer for the X Window System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207761 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-09-25 14:31 EST ------- You have super power to do patches quicker than light... You didn't repatch the xpdf-LANG/README files, though... It isn't a blocker (though it should be better). Moving to the issue of licencing I found that the LANG specific packages are under licences that are not GPL compatible (distribution without modification). Since it is font information (data), it seems to me that it doesn't contradict fedora goals, however it is dubious from a legal point of view to distribute the font information together with GPL code. It isn't obvious since it is code and font information. If the GPL part and distributable parts have to be split, it won't be obvious to do it since a simple split (for example all the xpdf-LANG*.tar.gz in a single package) wouldn't be right: in the xpdf-LANG.tar.gz the encoding files are covered by the GPL, only the CMap/* files are covered by the GPL-incompatible licence... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 25 18:45:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 14:45:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207761] Review Request: xpdf - A PDF file viewer for the X Window System In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609251845.k8PIjMlL021534@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xpdf - A PDF file viewer for the X Window System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207761 ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2006-09-25 14:45 EST ------- Having the Free but GPL-incompatible CMap files (which are not compiled) shipped alongside the GPL application (xpdf) is not a problem, since they are not linked together. The missing README fixes are now in the new patch. Here comes -23: New SRPM: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/xpdf-3.01-23.fc6.src.rpm New SPEC: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/xpdf.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 25 19:43:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 15:43:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208004] New: Review Request: perl-Test-Perl-Critic - Use Perl::Critic in test programs Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208004 Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-Perl-Critic - Use Perl::Critic in test programs Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jpo at di.uminho.pt QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: ftp://perl.di.uminho.pt/pub/fedora/perl-Test-Perl-Critic.spec SRPM URL: ftp://perl.di.uminho.pt/pub/fedora/perl-Test-Perl-Critic-0.07-1.src.rpm Description: Test::Perl::Critic wraps the Perl::Critic engine in a convenient subroutine suitable for test programs written using the Test::More framework. This makes it easy to integrate coding-standards enforcement into the build process. For ultimate convenience (at the expense of some flexibility), see the criticism pragma. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 25 19:46:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 15:46:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208006] New: Review Request: perl-Time-Period - A Perl module to deal with time periods Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208006 Summary: Review Request: perl-Time-Period - A Perl module to deal with time periods Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: robert at marcanoonline.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.marcanoonline.com/downloads/fedora/package_submissions/perl-Time-Period/perl-Time-Period.spec SRPM URL: http://www.marcanoonline.com/downloads/fedora/package_submissions/perl-Time-Period/perl-Time-Period-1.20-1.src.rpm Description: Period.pm is a Perl module that contains code to deal with time periods. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 25 19:48:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 15:48:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207761] Review Request: xpdf - A PDF file viewer for the X Window System In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609251948.k8PJmJBW027195@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xpdf - A PDF file viewer for the X Window System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207761 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-09-25 15:48 EST ------- Linking together is not the only reason why GPL and GPL-incompatible soft cannot cooperate. They shouldn't be in the same 'container'. Quoting the GPL: b) You must cause any work that you distribute or publish, that in whole or in part contains or is derived from the Program or any part thereof, to be licensed as a whole at no charge to all third parties under the terms of this License. So, for example it could be argued that xpdf-japanese-2004-jul-27.tar.gz contains the GPL-licenced encoding files, and therefore cause the files in CMap, distributed alongside to be licenced under the GPL which is not possible. It is also explained here: If identifiable sections of that work are not derived from the Program, and can be reasonably considered independent and separate works in themselves, then this License, and its terms, do not apply to those sections when you distribute them as separate works. But when you distribute the same sections as part of a whole which is a work based on the Program, the distribution of the whole must be on the terms of this License, whose permissions for other licensees extend to the entire whole, and thus to each and every part regardless of who wrote it. The first sentence, in my opinion describes what are the CMap files, "independent and separate works in themselves", so the GPL don't apply to them. However, as explained in the second sentence, "when you distribute the same sections as part of a whole which is a work based on the Program", which is the case for CMap files bundled together with encoding files covered by the GPL, "the distribution of the whole must be on the terms of this License, whose permissions for other licensees extend to the entire whole, and thus to each and every part regardless of who wrote it." Since the CMap cannot be distributed under the GPL, we have somewhere a licence violation. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 25 19:49:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 15:49:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208007] New: Review Request: perl-Alien-wxWidgets - Building, finding and using wxWidgets binaries Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208007 Summary: Review Request: perl-Alien-wxWidgets - Building, finding and using wxWidgets binaries Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jpo at di.uminho.pt QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: ftp://perl.di.uminho.pt/pub/fedora/perl-Alien-wxWidgets.spec SRPM URL: ftp://perl.di.uminho.pt/pub/fedora/perl-Alien-wxWidgets-0.21-1.src.rpm Description: "Alien::wxWidgets" can be used to detect and get configuration settings from an installed wxWidgets. Note: A requirement for perl-PPI-Tester (perl-Alien-wxWidgets -> perl-Wx -> perl-PPI-Tester) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 25 19:53:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 15:53:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206871] Review Request: ekg2 - Multi-protocol instant messaging and chat client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609251953.k8PJrJZm027741@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ekg2 - Multi-protocol instant messaging and chat client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206871 paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk |nobody at fedoraproject.org OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163776 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-09-25 15:53 EST ------- I'm going to have to duck out of this one - work pressures mean I can keep up with what I have but not much else. Reassigning this BZ to the default nobody to pick up -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 25 19:59:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 15:59:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208009] New: Review Request: perl-Wx - Interface to the wxWidgets cross-platform GUI toolkit Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208009 Summary: Review Request: perl-Wx - Interface to the wxWidgets cross-platform GUI toolkit Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jpo at di.uminho.pt QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: ftp://perl.di.uminho.pt/pub/fedora/perl-Wx.spec SRPM URL: ftp://perl.di.uminho.pt/pub/fedora/perl-Wx-0.57-1.src.rpm Description: The Wx module is a wrapper for the wxWidgets (formerly known as wxWindows) GUI toolkit. This module comes with extensive documentation in HTML format; you can download it from http://wxperl.sourceforge.net/. Note: A requirement for perl-PPI-Tester (perl-Wx -> perl-PPI-Tester) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 25 20:00:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 16:00:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205300] Review Request: gtk-sharp - a set of mono bindings for gtk1.2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609252000.k8PK02Ai028166@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtk-sharp - a set of mono bindings for gtk1.2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205300 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-09-25 15:59 EST ------- Ping! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 25 20:00:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 16:00:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208009] Review Request: perl-Wx - Interface to the wxWidgets cross-platform GUI toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609252000.k8PK0S93028200@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Wx - Interface to the wxWidgets cross-platform GUI toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208009 jpo at di.uminho.pt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |208007 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 25 20:00:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 16:00:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208007] Review Request: perl-Alien-wxWidgets - Building, finding and using wxWidgets binaries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609252000.k8PK0dZp028232@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Alien-wxWidgets - Building, finding and using wxWidgets binaries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208007 jpo at di.uminho.pt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |208009 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 25 20:11:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 16:11:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206266] Review Request: transmission - lightweight GTK+ BitTorrent client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609252011.k8PKBFVb029273@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: transmission - lightweight GTK+ BitTorrent client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206266 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-09-25 16:11 EST ------- 1. ok. Looks good. 2. Looks fine. I can't see that it matters too much either way if the desktop is a source file or part of the spec. 3. Well, %makeinstall should be avoided where possible for the reasons outlined above, but in this case it looks like you do need to use it. ;( All the blockers I see are fixed, this package is APPROVED. Don't forget to close this bug NEXTRELEASE once it's been imported and built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 25 20:36:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 16:36:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207761] Review Request: xpdf - A PDF file viewer for the X Window System In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609252036.k8PKalFm031649@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xpdf - A PDF file viewer for the X Window System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207761 ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2006-09-25 16:36 EST ------- OK. CMap files are gone from source tarballs, patched out of add-to-xpdfrc files. Also noticed that the thai and cyrillic files weren't actually being packaged (thankfully, they don't have CMap files). New SRPM: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/xpdf-3.01-24.fc6.src.rpm New SPEC: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/xpdf.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 25 20:43:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 16:43:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205929] Review Request: libfreebob - FreeBoB firewire audio driver library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609252043.k8PKh5F5032476@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libfreebob - FreeBoB firewire audio driver library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205929 rivanvx at fastmail.fm changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rivanvx at fastmail.fm ------- Additional Comments From rivanvx at fastmail.fm 2006-09-25 16:42 EST ------- I'm glad this is in process of getting included in Extras finally. I also own a PreSonus FireBox, great card :) I have been providing FreeBoB packages along with JACK and relevant libs for FC5 for a while. They are here: http://www.ffri.hr/~vmiletic/linux/fedora/ You say you bumped libavc1394. It also needs libiec61883 1.1.0, afaik. I also packaged svn version of libraw1394, as suggested on FreeBoB page. And last, but not the least: do you also plan to add FireWire soundcard detection support to system-config-soundcard at some point? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 25 20:43:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 16:43:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205300] Review Request: gtk-sharp - a set of mono bindings for gtk1.2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609252043.k8PKhiFt032540@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtk-sharp - a set of mono bindings for gtk1.2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205300 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|andreas at bawue.net |kevin at tummy.com OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-09-25 16:43 EST ------- ok, all those changes look pretty good. I'll go ahead and APPROVE this package. Thanks for all your hard work on it. Please remember to close this NEXTRELEASE once it's been imported and built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 25 20:46:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 16:46:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207761] Review Request: xpdf - A PDF file viewer for the X Window System In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609252046.k8PKkS7s000466@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xpdf - A PDF file viewer for the X Window System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207761 ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2006-09-25 16:46 EST ------- Whoops. Forgot to patch the pathing for thai/cyrillic. Fixed now. New SRPM: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/xpdf-3.01-25.fc6.src.rpm New SPEC: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/xpdf.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 25 21:10:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 17:10:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205300] Review Request: gtk-sharp - a set of mono bindings for gtk1.2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609252110.k8PLAAJp002887@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtk-sharp - a set of mono bindings for gtk1.2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205300 paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-09-25 17:10 EST ------- Thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 25 21:24:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 17:24:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193867] Review Request: klamav - Clam Anti-Virus on the KDE Desktop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609252124.k8PLOwiv004742@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: klamav - Clam Anti-Virus on the KDE Desktop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193867 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2006-09-25 17:24 EST ------- #1: remove zlib-devel as BuildRequires since curl-devel requires openssl-devel and the later requires zlib-devel #2: replace "Requires: %{_bindir}/freshclam" by "Requires: clamav-update" #3: In %post and %postun replace if [ -x %{_bindir}/gtk-update-icon-cache ]; then %{_bindir}/gtk-update-icon-cache --quiet %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor || : fi by %{_bindir}/gtk-update-icon-cache --quiet %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor || : since "|| :" causes the command to exit with a successful exit status whether or not the command worked. #4 debug rpm: chitlesh(SPECS)[0]$rpmlint /home/chitlesh/rpmbuild/RPMS/i386/klamav-debuginfo-0.38-2.i386.rpm E: klamav-debuginfo script-without-shebang /usr/src/debug/klamav-0.38/src/klammail/client.c E: klamav-debuginfo script-without-shebang /usr/src/debug/klamav-0.38/src/klammail/options.c E: klamav-debuginfo script-without-shebang /usr/src/debug/klamav-0.38/src/klammail/options.h E: klamav-debuginfo script-without-shebang /usr/src/debug/klamav-0.38/src/klammail/clamdmail.c E: klamav-debuginfo script-without-shebang /usr/src/debug/klamav-0.38/src/klammail/treewalk.c Solution: in %install, add chmod 644 src/klammail/*.{c,h} #5: rpmlint rpm chitlesh(SPECS)[0]$rpmlint /home/chitlesh/rpmbuild/RPMS/i386/klamav-0.38-2.i386.rpm W: klamav dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/klamav02/common ../common /tmp/klamav-0.38-2.i386.rpm.20210/usr/share/applications/fedora-klamav.desktop: warning: file contains key "DocPath", this key is currently reserved for use within KDE, and should in the future KDE releases be prefixed by "X-" Ignore both. /tmp/klamav-0.38-2.i386.rpm.20210/usr/share/applications/fedora-klamav.desktop: warning: boolean key "Terminal" has value "0", boolean values should be "false" or "true", although "0" and "1" are allowed in this field for backwards compatibility Solution (one line): %{__sed} -i.orig -e '/^Terminal/s|^.*$|Terminal=false|' \ ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}%{_datadir}/applnk/Utilities/%{name}.desktop %{__rm} -f ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}%{_datadir}/applnk/Utilities/%{name}.desktop.orig before "desktop-file-install --vendor fedora \" .. #6: in %doc, drop NEWS, because it's empty -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 25 21:29:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 17:29:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206487] Review Request: jd - A 2ch browser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609252129.k8PLTEuh005087@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jd - A 2ch browser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206487 cgoorah at yahoo.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 25 21:49:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 17:49:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207761] Review Request: xpdf - A PDF file viewer for the X Window System In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609252149.k8PLnGhe006882@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xpdf - A PDF file viewer for the X Window System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207761 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-09-25 17:49 EST ------- It is right now. I looked at all the files to find other licence issues. in goo/, some vms_* files have no licence and the copyright: * vms_directory.c: Patrick L. Mahan * vms_unix_times.c: ? * vms_unlink.c: Thanks to Patrick Moreau (pmoreau at cena.dgac.fr). * vms_dirent.h: @(#)dirent.h 1.7 89/06/25 SMI * vms_sys_dirent.h: @(#)dirent.h 1.4 89/06/16 SMI The ones that seem problematic are goo/vms_directory.c and goo/vms_*dirent.h, since they have a copyright and no licence. With a licence, one have: * vms_unix_time.h: 1982, 1986 Berkeley software License Agreement It seems also problematic to me since I believe at that time it was the BSD incompatible with the GPL. The file in splash don't have any copyright nor licence. That is strange, but they can certainly be considered public domain, so no problem here. The goo/vms_* files aren't used at all. I fear the problematic files goo/vms_directory.c and goo/vms_*dirent.h should be removed. And the upstream should certainly be contacted for those issues (and the CMap issues), although there is a comment in the README, about the GPL which seems very strange. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 25 22:03:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 18:03:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205300] Review Request: gtk-sharp - a set of mono bindings for gtk1.2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609252203.k8PM3W6A007864@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtk-sharp - a set of mono bindings for gtk1.2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205300 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |wtogami at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2006-09-25 18:03 EST ------- Why do you want a FE5 branch when this is already in FC5? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 25 22:08:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 18:08:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207079] Review Request: perl-Cache - The Cache interface In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609252208.k8PM80qZ008143@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Cache - The Cache interface https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207079 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-09-25 18:07 EST ------- the FC-5 package is available now -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 25 22:12:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 18:12:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207761] Review Request: xpdf - A PDF file viewer for the X Window System In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609252212.k8PMCFdx008314@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xpdf - A PDF file viewer for the X Window System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207761 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-09-25 18:12 EST ------- (In reply to comment #23) > The goo/vms_* files aren't used at all. I fear the problematic files > goo/vms_directory.c and goo/vms_*dirent.h should be removed. And goo/vms_unix_time.h also should certainly be removed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 25 22:13:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 18:13:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207846] Review Request: perl-Finance-YahooQuote - Perl interface to get stock quotes from Yahoo! Finance In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609252213.k8PMD8j1008364@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Finance-YahooQuote - Perl interface to get stock quotes from Yahoo! Finance Alias: finance-YahooQuote https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207846 ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2006-09-25 18:12 EST ------- Warren: I tried to build this under mock with %check enabled and a BR of perl(HTTP::Request::Common). This also results in a failure and warnings mentioned in the build log of missing packages. By using a BR of perl(HTTP::Request), this fixes the problem. perl(HTTP::Request) needs to be added to the BR in order for %check to function and should be added even though it is not used for official builds. A developer who enables the %check section would not automatically know this otherwise. The build log also indicates that rpm is adding a Requires of perl(HTTP::Request::Common), however, when I tried using this for a BR, it fails and the following warnings are shown: Warning: prerequisite HTML::Parser 2.2 not found. Warning: prerequisite HTTP::Request 1.23 not found. Warning: prerequisite LWP::UserAgent 1.62 not found. These packages do not show up as being required by rpm. Therefore, I think a "Requires: perl(HTTP::Request)" also needs to be added to the spec file. Please add this unless you can show that it is not required. ==== Review Checklist ==== - rpmlint output clean - package named according to package naming guidelines - filename matches spec's %{name} - package meets packaging guidelines - package licensed with opensource compatible license - license in spec matches actual license - license included in %doc - spec written in American english - spec file legible - sources match upstream 844d26ef02f16216840aac5815a6a6a7 Finance-YahooQuote-0.21.tar.gz - package successfully compiles and builds on FC5 x86_64 - package does not contain locales - package does not contain shared libraries/static libraries/pkgconfig files or any other files required for a devel subpackage - package is not relocatable - package does not contain duplicate files in %files - permissions on files set properly - package contains proper %clean section - macro usage is consistent - package contains code - no large documentation files - files in %doc do not affect runtime - no need for .desktop files === MUST === - Please address concerns I have about BuildRequires and Requires issues I mention above. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 25 22:40:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 18:40:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207763] Review Request: ddd - GUI for several command-line debuggers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609252240.k8PMe9WN009916@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ddd - GUI for several command-line debuggers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207763 jkeating at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(tcallawa at redhat.co | |m) ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-09-25 18:40 EST ------- Now missing a br on libtool. Otherwise passes rpmlint other than mixed tabs/spaces and info.gz files not being in utf8 format. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 25 22:46:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 18:46:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193867] Review Request: klamav - Clam Anti-Virus on the KDE Desktop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609252246.k8PMkLjD010178@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: klamav - Clam Anti-Virus on the KDE Desktop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193867 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2006-09-25 18:46 EST ------- drop bzip2-devel as well as BuildRequires, as klamav builds successfully without it in mock. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 25 22:52:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 18:52:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203694] Review Request: rawstudio - digital camera raw-image converter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609252252.k8PMqK02010355@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rawstudio - digital camera raw-image converter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203694 giallu at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From giallu at gmail.com 2006-09-25 18:52 EST ------- Package imported and built for FC-5 and devel branches -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 25 22:55:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 18:55:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208032] New: Review Request: HippoDraw - Interactive and Python scriptable data analysis application Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208032 Summary: Review Request: HippoDraw - Interactive and Python scriptable data analysis application Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: paul_kunz at slac.stanford.edu QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: ftp://ftp.slac.stanford.edu/users/pfkeb/hippodraw/HippoDraw.spec SRPM URL: ftp://ftp.slac.stanford.edu/users/pfkeb/hippodraw/HippoDraw-1.18.5-1.src.rpm Description: HippoDraw is a highly interactive data analysis environment that can be used as a stand-a-lone application or as a Python extension module. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 25 22:57:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 18:57:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207846] Review Request: perl-Finance-YahooQuote - Perl interface to get stock quotes from Yahoo! Finance In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609252257.k8PMviZQ010659@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Finance-YahooQuote - Perl interface to get stock quotes from Yahoo! Finance Alias: finance-YahooQuote https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207846 ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2006-09-25 18:57 EST ------- I've looked into this problem a bit more and the root.log is showing that using perl(HTTP::Request::Common) brings in the mod_perl package instead of the perl-libwww-perl package. Should mod_perl be Providing perl(HTTP::Request::Common)? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 25 22:58:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 18:58:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208034] New: Review Request: HippoDraw - Interactive and Python scriptable data analysis application Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208034 Summary: Review Request: HippoDraw - Interactive and Python scriptable data analysis application Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: paul_kunz at slac.stanford.edu QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: ftp://ftp.slac.stanford.edu/users/pfkeb/hippodraw/HippoDraw.spec SRPM URL: ftp://ftp.slac.stanford.edu/users/pfkeb/hippodraw/HippoDraw-1.18.5-1.src.rpm Description: HippoDraw is a highly interactive data analysis environment that can be used as a stand-a-lone application or as a Python extension module. This is my first package and am seeking sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 25 23:10:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 19:10:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208034] Review Request: HippoDraw - Interactive and Python scriptable data analysis application In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609252310.k8PNAVuV011036@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: HippoDraw - Interactive and Python scriptable data analysis application https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208034 paul_kunz at slac.stanford.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 25 23:22:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 19:22:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205300] Review Request: gtk-sharp - a set of mono bindings for gtk1.2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609252322.k8PNM7Cp011412@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtk-sharp - a set of mono bindings for gtk1.2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205300 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-09-25 19:22 EST ------- gtk-sharp has been moved from core to extras as there is nothing in core which uses it anymore. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 26 00:18:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 20:18:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207805] Review Request: skey - An S/Key implementation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609260018.k8Q0IgVi013713@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: skey - An S/Key implementation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207805 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-09-25 20:18 EST ------- Given the confusion over the license, perhaps these bits of clarification could find their way into the package so there's no question later. (Perhaps I'm being dense here, but comment #6 seems to incorporate the logdaemon license by reference. It might be good to include it as well.) I agree that it would be good to split the package into skey-clients and skey-server (or whatever is reasonable) to get the setuid stuff away from what most people would need to install. The thought of very old source and setuid bits makes me pucker, but you're the maintainer so it's your call. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 26 00:23:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 20:23:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207927] Review Request: supertuxkart - Kids 3D go-kart racing game featuring Tux In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609260023.k8Q0NPC2013896@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: supertuxkart - Kids 3D go-kart racing game featuring Tux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207927 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |kevin at tummy.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-09-25 20:23 EST ------- ok. I would be happy to (re)review this. Look for a full review in a bit here... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 26 00:39:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 20:39:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207927] Review Request: supertuxkart - Kids 3D go-kart racing game featuring Tux In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609260039.k8Q0dmBn014816@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: supertuxkart - Kids 3D go-kart racing game featuring Tux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207927 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-09-25 20:39 EST ------- OK - Package name OK - Spec file matches base package name. OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines. OK - License (GPL) OK - License field in spec matches OK - License file included in package OK - Spec in American English OK - Spec is legible. No, but ok - Sources match upstream md5sum: (images removed) OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch. OK - BuildRequires correct OK - Package owns all the directories it creates. OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files. OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. OK - Package has a correct %clean section. OK - Spec has consistant macro usage. OK - Package is code or permissible content. OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime. OK - Package is a GUI app and has a .desktop file OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. See below - No rpmlint output. SHOULD Items: OK - Should include License or ask upstream to include it. OK - Should build in mock. Issues: 1. Perhaps 'images-leagal.txt' could be renamed 'supertuxkart-images-legal.txt' just to make it easier to find if you unpack the src.rpm? (just a minor nit). Has any move been made to get upstream to change images to make it more distributable moving forward? 2. Your provides and obsoletes don't look quite right to me. Perhaps that should be: Provides: tuxkart = %{version}-%{release} Obsoletes: tuxkart <= 0.4.0-6 I'm looking at: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#head- 581c3fb3ff1c6ef7404e8b288b59cd5280d75ad6 3. rpmlint says: supertuxkart incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.4.0-5 0.2-1.fc6 (the .fc6 doesn't need to be there, just the version... ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 26 00:52:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 20:52:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187706] Review Request: alsa-oss - Userspace OSS emulation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609260052.k8Q0qf9E015348@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: alsa-oss - Userspace OSS emulation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187706 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|fedora-extras- |fedora-package- |list at redhat.com |review at redhat.com fibonacci.prower at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fibonacci.prower at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From fibonacci.prower at gmail.com 2006-09-25 20:52 EST ------- There's a bunch of applications that use only OSS (Flash and Skype come to mind), and no amount of tinkering with asound.conf / .asoundrc would allow me to dmix them, so no other audio stream can be played while one of those apps is running. AOSS, on the other hand, has no problem dmixing multiple OSS streams, and I didn't have to tweak anything. It should surely be brought back. See this thread on Fedora forum for more information: http://www.fedoraforum.org/forum/showthread.php?p=615401 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 26 00:54:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 20:54:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208004] Review Request: perl-Test-Perl-Critic - Use Perl::Critic in test programs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609260054.k8Q0svTN015444@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-Perl-Critic - Use Perl::Critic in test programs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208004 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 26 01:02:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 21:02:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208004] Review Request: perl-Test-Perl-Critic - Use Perl::Critic in test programs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609260102.k8Q12x7K015676@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-Perl-Critic - Use Perl::Critic in test programs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208004 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-09-25 21:02 EST ------- * source files match upstream: 91c1dc234b4c6ec1f06300085f0559cf Test-Perl-Critic-0.07.tar.gz * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * dist tag is present. * build root is correct. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. License text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * package installs properly * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: perl(Test::Perl::Critic) = 0.07 perl-Test-Perl-Critic = 0.07-1.fc6 = perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8) perl(Carp) perl(English) perl(File::Spec) perl(Perl::Critic) perl(Perl::Critic::Utils) perl(Test::Builder) perl(strict) perl(warnings) * %check is present and all tests pass: All tests successful. Files=7, Tests=14, 3 wallclock secs ( 3.09 cusr + 0.39 csys = 3.48 CPU) * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 26 01:09:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 21:09:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208006] Review Request: perl-Time-Period - A Perl module to deal with time periods In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609260109.k8Q1914Y015975@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Time-Period - A Perl module to deal with time periods https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208006 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 26 01:26:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 21:26:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205929] Review Request: libfreebob - FreeBoB firewire audio driver library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609260126.k8Q1QnDX016751@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libfreebob - FreeBoB firewire audio driver library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205929 ------- Additional Comments From green at redhat.com 2006-09-25 21:26 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > I'm glad this is in process of getting included in Extras finally. I also own a > PreSonus FireBox, great card :) > > I have been providing FreeBoB packages along with JACK and relevant libs for > FC5 for a while. They are here: http://www.ffri.hr/~vmiletic/linux/fedora/ Oh, cool. I'll look at your package. BTW, contributing to Extras is pretty straight forward for anybody to do. > You say you bumped libavc1394. Yes, I got the maintainer to push a newer version into FC. > It also needs libiec61883 1.1.0, afaik. I also > packaged svn version of libraw1394, as suggested on FreeBoB page. When I asked about this I was told that it wasn't all that important, and I could just tweak the configury to require the older version we have in FC. > And last, but not the least: do you also plan to add FireWire soundcard > detection support to system-config-soundcard at some point? I wasn't planning on it. My understanding is that there's some upheaval in the works for audio in Fedora (see PulseAudio). Whatever is done, should probably be done in the context of PulseAudio. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 26 01:41:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 21:41:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208006] Review Request: perl-Time-Period - A Perl module to deal with time periods In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609260141.k8Q1fm0M017711@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Time-Period - A Perl module to deal with time periods https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208006 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-09-25 21:41 EST ------- * source files match upstream: 63b073af8ec96e7fa48801cd6fcccdd1 Period-1.20.tar.gz * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * dist tag is present. * build root is correct. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. License text not included upstream. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper (BR: perl is unnecessary) * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * package installs properly * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: perl(Time::Period) = 1.20 perl-Time-Period = 1.20-1.fc6 = perl >= 0:5.001 perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8) perl(Exporter) * %check is present but the package has no tests to run. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 26 01:52:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 21:52:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205300] Review Request: gtk-sharp - a set of mono bindings for gtk1.2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609260152.k8Q1qllB018076@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtk-sharp - a set of mono bindings for gtk1.2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205300 ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2006-09-25 21:52 EST ------- FC5 has gtk-sharp. Why did you request a branch for FE5? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 26 01:57:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 21:57:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208007] Review Request: perl-Alien-wxWidgets - Building, finding and using wxWidgets binaries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609260157.k8Q1veo8018257@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Alien-wxWidgets - Building, finding and using wxWidgets binaries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208007 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 26 02:15:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 22:15:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208007] Review Request: perl-Alien-wxWidgets - Building, finding and using wxWidgets binaries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609260215.k8Q2Fe3b018991@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Alien-wxWidgets - Building, finding and using wxWidgets binaries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208007 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-09-25 22:15 EST ------- The build does complain about many libraries (which seem to be wxwidgets components) not being found but this seems to have no effect on that resulting package. * source files match upstream: 6975385d6e4d4d58c5d589c2a7077d23 Alien-wxWidgets-0.21.tar.gz * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * dist tag is present. * build root is correct. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. License text not included upstream. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * package installs properly * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: perl(Alien::wxWidgets) = 0.21 perl(Alien::wxWidgets::Config::gtk2_2_6_3_uni_gcc_3_4) perl(Alien::wxWidgets::Utility) perl-Alien-wxWidgets = 0.21-1.fc6 = perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8) perl(Alien::wxWidgets::Utility) perl(Carp) perl(Config) perl(Module::Pluggable) perl(base) perl(strict) * %check is present and all tests pass: All tests successful. Files=2, Tests=17, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.11 cusr + 0.06 csys = 0.17 CPU) * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 26 02:53:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 22:53:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199108] Review Request: gutenprint: Printer Drivers Package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609260253.k8Q2r3En021607@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gutenprint: Printer Drivers Package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199108 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-09-25 22:53 EST ------- ok, looking at the cups.spec from core, what they do is at the top define: %define cups_serverbin %{_exec_prefix}/lib/cups I think you should do likewise and then replace the %{_libdir} in the cups package and the directories you remove from the cups package with the macro above... I tried something like this: --- gutenprint.spec.1 2006-09-08 06:34:57.000000000 -0600 +++ gutenprint.spec 2006-09-25 20:12:30.000000000 -0600 @@ -1,4 +1,5 @@ %define build_with_ijs_support 1 +%define cups_serverbin %{_exec_prefix}/lib/cups Name: gutenprint Summary: Printer Drivers Package @@ -223,9 +224,9 @@ rm -rf %{buildroot}%{_bindir}/escputil rm -rf %{buildroot}%{_mandir}/man1/escputil.1* rm -rf %{buildroot}%{_libdir}/gimp/2.0/plug-ins/print -rm -rf %{buildroot}%{_libdir}/cups/backend/* -rm -rf %{buildroot}%{_libdir}/cups/filter/commandtocanon -rm -rf %{buildroot}%{_libdir}/cups/filter/commandtoepson +rm -rf %{buildroot}%{cups_serverbin}/backend/* +rm -rf %{buildroot}%{cups_serverbin}/filter/commandtocanon +rm -rf %{buildroot}%{cups_serverbin}/filter/commandtoepson rm -rf %{buildroot}%{_bindir}/cups-calibrate rm -rf %{buildroot}%{_mandir}/man8/cups-calibrate.8* @@ -304,10 +305,10 @@ %defattr(-, root, root,-) %config(noreplace) %{_sysconfdir}/cups/command.types %{_datadir}/cups/calibrate.ppm -#%{_libdir}/cups/backend/* -#%{_libdir}/cups/filter/* +#%{cups_serverbin}/cups/backend/* +#%{cups_serverbin}/cups/filter/* #%{_bindir}/cups-calibrate -%{_libdir}/cups/filter/rastertogutenprint.5.0 +%{cups_serverbin}/filter/rastertogutenprint.5.0 %{_sbindir}/cups-genppd* %{_datadir}/cups/model/gutenprint/5.0/C #%{_mandir}/man8/cups-calibrate.8* That gets it further, but it's now dying in a very odd way making the ppd files. If you would like access to my x86_64 test box to do test builds, drop me an email and I will get you access there. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 26 02:58:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 22:58:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205075] Review Request: fwbackups - a user backup program, with support for automated backups and on-demand backups In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609260258.k8Q2wh8f021974@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fwbackups - a user backup program, with support for automated backups and on-demand backups https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205075 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 26 03:15:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 23:15:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199108] Review Request: gutenprint: Printer Drivers Package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609260315.k8Q3Ftsb023334@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gutenprint: Printer Drivers Package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199108 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-09-25 23:15 EST ------- Oddly, that error only happens on devel/fc6. On fc5, the above patch gets it compiling on x86_64 just fine. ;( For folks that would like to test, I have put up some repos for fc5{i386/ x86_64} and fc6(i386 only for now): --cut-- [gutenprint-test] name=gutenprint testing rpms baseurl=http://www.scrye.com/gutenprint/$releasever/$basearch/ enabled=1 gpgcheck=0 --cut-- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 26 03:19:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 23:19:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196591] Review Request: bitlbee In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609260319.k8Q3JOXg023590@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bitlbee https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196591 ------- Additional Comments From paul at xelerance.com 2006-09-25 23:19 EST ------- I am still testing it. I ended up not trusting the old copy of the otrproxy I used for testing, so I ended up upgrading that (and turning it into an FE package). I should hopefully finish testing tomorrow. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 26 03:23:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 23:23:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208006] Review Request: perl-Time-Period - A Perl module to deal with time periods In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609260323.k8Q3NHqc024007@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Time-Period - A Perl module to deal with time periods https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208006 robert at marcanoonline.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 26 03:27:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 23:27:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208051] New: Review Request: dirvish - Fast, disk based, rotating network backup system Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208051 Summary: Review Request: dirvish - Fast, disk based, rotating network backup system Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: robert at marcanoonline.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.marcanoonline.com/downloads/fedora/package_submissions/dirvish/dirvish.spec SRPM URL: http://www.marcanoonline.com/downloads/fedora/package_submissions/dirvish/dirvish-1.2.1-1.src.rpm Description: Dirvish is a fast, disk based, rotating network backup system. With dirvish you can maintain a set of complete images of your filesystems with unattended creation and expiration. A dirvish backup vault is like a time machine for your data. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 26 03:38:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 23:38:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204140] Review Request: libmtp - MTP client library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609260338.k8Q3cOhS025378@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libmtp - MTP client library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204140 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |kevin at tummy.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-09-25 23:38 EST ------- OK - Package name OK - Spec file matches base package name. OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines. OK - License (LGPL) OK - License field in spec matches OK - License file included in package OK - Spec in American English OK - Spec is legible. OK - Sources match upstream md5sum: 5d22b16cb7e6a117cdf489669821df09 libmtp-0.0.15.tar.gz 5d22b16cb7e6a117cdf489669821df09 libmtp-0.0.15.tar.gz.1 OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch. OK - BuildRequires correct OK - Spec has needed ldconfig in post and postun OK - Package owns all the directories it creates. OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files. See below - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. OK - Package has a correct %clean section. OK - Spec has consistant macro usage. OK - Package is code or permissible content. OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime. OK - Headers/static libs in -devel subpackage. OK - .pc files in -devel subpackage. OK - .so files in -devel subpackage. OK - -devel package Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} OK - .la files are removed. OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. See below - No rpmlint output. SHOULD Items: OK - Should include License or ask upstream to include it. OK - Should build in mock. OK - Should have subpackages require base package with fully versioned depend. Issues: 1. 0.0.19 is now available. 2. Might change the defattr from: %defattr(-, root, root) to %defattr(-, root, root,-) 3. rpmlint says: W: libmtp no-documentation W: libmtp-examples no-documentation Can be ignored. W: libmtp mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs Should clean up spec to only use tabs or spaces, not both. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 26 03:42:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 23:42:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205075] Review Request: fwbackups - a user backup program, with support for automated backups and on-demand backups In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609260342.k8Q3gl6p025770@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fwbackups - a user backup program, with support for automated backups and on-demand backups https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205075 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-09-25 23:42 EST ------- Hmm, the tarball does not match upstream: c987096dc11e2605f4a73c19484a4a9b fwbackups-1.42.tar.gz 10c8fda1c5809681aa870a2c71f84ed5 ../fwbackups-1.42.tar.gz The files are different sizes as well (31347 in the srpm, 32282 upstream). I'm not sure why you have constructs like this in %install: install -p -d -m755 etc/fwbackups\ ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}%{_sysconfdir}/fwbackups install -d creates each of its arguments as directories, but "etc/fwbackups" already exists because it's in your source tarball. You install fwbackups.conf twice. I think you could significantly shrink your %install section with by using "cp -rp" instead of installing each file separately, but I suppose that's up to you. Note that there's currently some discussion about changing the recommendations for installing desktop files, but that won't be decided for another several days and I don't think it will effect your package. Are you sure fwbackups.conf.default should go in /etc? It should certainly not be marked noreplace as you want it to change on an upgrade (since the old version isn't the default any longer). I would consider marking it %doc instead. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 26 04:06:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 00:06:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177512] Review Request: mysql-connector-net In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609260406.k8Q46s25027462@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mysql-connector-net https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177512 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |kevin at tummy.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-09-26 00:06 EST ------- OK - Package name OK - Spec file matches base package name. OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines. OK - License (GPL) OK - License field in spec matches OK - License file included in package OK - Spec in American English OK - Spec is legible. OK - Sources match upstream md5sum: 153f4bb405af5ae59565084a9ce6e1b1 mysql-connector-net-1.0.7-noinstall.zip 153f4bb405af5ae59565084a9ce6e1b1 mysql-connector-net-1.0.7-noinstall.zip.1 OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch. OK - BuildRequires correct OK - Package owns all the directories it creates. OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files. See below - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. OK - Package has a correct %clean section. OK - Spec has consistant macro usage. OK - Package is code or permissible content. OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime. OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. See below - No rpmlint output. SHOULD Items: OK - Should include License or ask upstream to include it. OK - Should build in mock. Issues: 1. Might change defattr from: %defattr(-,root,root) to %defattr(-,root,root,-) 2. rpmlint says: E: mysql-connector-net no-binary E: mysql-connector-net only-non-binary-in-usr-lib I think those can be ignored, as rpmlint doesn't know mono bins. W: mysql-connector-net wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/mysql- connector-net-1.0.7/COPYING W: mysql-connector-net wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/mysql- connector-net-1.0.7/EXCEPTIONS W: mysql-connector-net wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/mysql- connector-net-1.0.7/CHANGES W: mysql-connector-net wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/mysql- connector-net-1.0.7/README Should run a quick: %{__sed} -i 's/\r//' on those files? E: mysql-connector-net hardcoded-library-path in %{_prefix}/lib I think this is due to the core mono packaging? W: mysql-connector-net rpm-buildroot-usage %build rm -rf %{buildroot} That rm -rf %{buildroot} should at the top of 'install' and not 'build' ? E: mysql-connector-net-debuginfo empty-debuginfo-package Why no debuginfo files? Other mono packages have them. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 26 04:12:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 00:12:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207763] Review Request: ddd - GUI for several command-line debuggers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609260412.k8Q4CwAR027781@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ddd - GUI for several command-line debuggers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207763 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(tcallawa at redhat.co| |m) | ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2006-09-26 00:12 EST ------- Added the BR: libtool Fixed the mixed tab spaces. Ignored the info.gz files. New SRPM: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/ddd-3.3.11-10.fc6.src.rpm New SPEC: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/ddd.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 26 04:26:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 00:26:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207761] Review Request: xpdf - A PDF file viewer for the X Window System In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609260426.k8Q4Qcbo028311@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xpdf - A PDF file viewer for the X Window System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207761 ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2006-09-26 00:26 EST ------- Tarball edited to remove goo/vms_* New SRPM: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/xpdf-3.01-26.fc6.src.rpm New SPEC: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/xpdf.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 26 05:09:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 01:09:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204140] Review Request: libmtp - MTP client library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609260509.k8Q59dii029737@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libmtp - MTP client library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204140 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2006-09-26 01:09 EST ------- MUST FIX: * *-devel ships a *.pc => Missing "Requires: pkgconfig" in *-devel BUG: * The *.pc being shipped should "Require: libusb" instead of hard-coding -lusb in Libs. SHOULD: * Use make DESTDIR=... install instead of %makeinstall -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 26 05:12:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 01:12:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208032] Review Request: HippoDraw - Interactive and Python scriptable data analysis application In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609260512.k8Q5CWsA029924@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: HippoDraw - Interactive and Python scriptable data analysis application https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208032 rc040203 at freenet.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2006-09-26 01:12 EST ------- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 208034 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 26 05:12:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 01:12:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208034] Review Request: HippoDraw - Interactive and Python scriptable data analysis application In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609260512.k8Q5Ch8P029945@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: HippoDraw - Interactive and Python scriptable data analysis application https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208034 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2006-09-26 01:12 EST ------- *** Bug 208032 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 26 06:29:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 02:29:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206487] Review Request: jd - A 2ch browser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609260629.k8Q6T7Yi000578@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jd - A 2ch browser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206487 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2006-09-26 02:29 EST ------- MUST Items: - MUST: rpmlint's output is clean - MUST: The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. - MUST: The spec file name matches the base package %{name} - MUST: The package meets the Packaging Guidelines. - MUST: The package is licensed (GPL) with an open-source compatible license and meet other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. - MUST: The License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. - MUST: the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. - MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. - MUST: The spec file for the package is be legible. - MUST: The sources used to build the package must matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. - MUST: The package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least i386. - MUST: All build dependencies is listed in BuildRequires. - No locales present - MUST: If the package does not contain shared library files located in the dynamic linker's default paths - MUST: the package is not designed to be relocatable - MUST: the package owns all directories that it creates. - MUST: the package does not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. - MUST: Permissions on files are set properly. - MUST: The package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). - MUST: The package consistently uses macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines. - MUST: The package contains code, or permissable content. This is described in detail in the code vs. content section of Packaging Guidelines. - MUST: There are no Large documentation files - MUST: %doc does not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. - MUST: There are no Header files or static libraries - MUST: The package does not contain library files with a suffix - MUST: Package does NOT contain any .la libtool archives - MUST: Package containing GUI applications includes a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. - MUST: Package does not own files or directories already owned by other packages. SHOULD Items: - SHOULD: The source package does include license text(s) as COPYING - SHOULD: mock builds succcessfully in i386. - SHOULD: The reviewer tested that the package functions as described. A package should not segfault instead of running, for example. - SHOULD: No subpackages present. Mamuro can you remove AUTHORS from %doc since it's empty ? The case of missing gtkmm24, you are right. There will be less breakage via yum? This is package has been APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 26 06:32:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 02:32:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206487] Review Request: jd - A 2ch browser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609260632.k8Q6Wx6K000692@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jd - A 2ch browser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206487 cgoorah at yahoo.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 26 06:46:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 02:46:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205300] Review Request: gtk-sharp - a set of mono bindings for gtk1.2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609260646.k8Q6ktD6001522@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtk-sharp - a set of mono bindings for gtk1.2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205300 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-09-26 02:46 EST ------- There isn't anything in FC-5 or rawhide which uses gtk-sharp anymore. Have a word with caillon and alexl. The removal of gtk-sharp-1.0.10 was taken about a month back and before it was placed on the orphan list, I snapped it up. It is now an FE package, so by default only has a rawhide entry. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 26 06:49:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 02:49:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206487] Review Request: jd - A 2ch browser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609260649.k8Q6noAd001636@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jd - A 2ch browser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206487 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-09-26 02:49 EST ------- Thank you for reviewing and approving this package!! Now I will try to import this to cvs. (In reply to comment #6) > Mamuro can you remove AUTHORS from %doc since it's empty ? I think AUTHORS file is not included in jd (binary) package. > > The case of missing gtkmm24, you are right. There will be less breakage via yum? Yes. Actually I installed this (jd) by using yum as following. When I want to review a package or to install some packages rebuilt by myself, * I usually rebuild it in mock, then the binary rpms are created. * Then I usually move all binary rpms (which are rebuilt by me in mock) to some directory (for me /var/lib/mock/LOCALRPMS/i386) * Move to /var/lib/mock/LOCALRPMS/i386, then I do: chmod 0644 *rpm ; createrepo $(pwd) ; chmod 0755 repodata/ ; chmod 0644 repodata/* then repository metadata is created (createrepo rpm is in CORE). * I have the following repository entry in /etc/yum.repos.d/LOCAL.repo: -------------------------------------- [LOCAL] name=LOCAL - locally created rpms baseurl=file:///var/lib/mock/LOCALRPMS/i386/ enabled=1 gpgcheck=0 -------------------------------------- * Then I can install rpms rebuilt locally by me with yum. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 26 06:54:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 02:54:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205300] Review Request: gtk-sharp - a set of mono bindings for gtk1.2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609260654.k8Q6s8nx001821@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtk-sharp - a set of mono bindings for gtk1.2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205300 ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2006-09-26 02:54 EST ------- gtk-sharp *IS* in Fedora Core 5. Thus it makes no sense to branch it there and rebuild it in Extras for Fedora Core 5. It does make sense to do this for FC6. Do you concur? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 26 07:02:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 03:02:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206266] Review Request: transmission - lightweight GTK+ BitTorrent client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609260702.k8Q72Cwb002190@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: transmission - lightweight GTK+ BitTorrent client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206266 denis at poolshark.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From denis at poolshark.org 2006-09-26 03:02 EST ------- Built. thanks for your review :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 26 07:09:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 03:09:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206487] Review Request: jd - A 2ch browser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609260709.k8Q79LIH002465@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jd - A 2ch browser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206487 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2006-09-26 03:09 EST ------- Thanks :) That's experience talking :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 26 07:15:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 03:15:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208064] New: Review Request: courier-authlib - Courier authentication library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208064 Summary: Review Request: courier-authlib - Courier authentication library Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lists at forevermore.net QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://rpm.forevermore.net/courier-authlib/courier-authlib.spec SRPM URL: http://rpm.forevermore.net/courier-authlib/courier-authlib-0.58-2.fc5.src.rpm Description: The Courier authentication library provides authentication services for other Courier (mail server) applications. Notes: This is the upstream spec, which I recently cleaned up and brought as close to fedora requirements as possible. There are a few lingering things like mandrake/rh detection that I would like to be able to leave in place (since this and courier itself are quite involved, I would rather not maintain them separate from the upstream files). Package builds cleanly in mock. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 26 07:16:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 03:16:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206487] Review Request: jd - A 2ch browser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609260716.k8Q7GwlE002861@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jd - A 2ch browser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206487 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-09-26 03:16 EST ------- Now: * Rebuild for FE-devel succeeded. * SyncNeeded is requiested for FE-5. When rebuild for FE-5 ends, I will close this bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 26 07:19:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 03:19:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208064] Review Request: courier-authlib - Courier authentication library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609260719.k8Q7JXui002938@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: courier-authlib - Courier authentication library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208064 ------- Additional Comments From lists at forevermore.net 2006-09-26 03:19 EST ------- Forgot to mention, rpmlint complains about library-without-ldconfig-postun but none of the files listed are actually in a directory that ldconfig would load, nor are they used by anything other than courier itself, which knows the proper place to look. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 26 07:26:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 03:26:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207761] Review Request: xpdf - A PDF file viewer for the X Window System In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609260726.k8Q7QWps003417@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xpdf - A PDF file viewer for the X Window System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207761 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2006-09-26 03:26 EST ------- (In reply to comment #23) > It is right now. I looked at all the files to find other > licence issues. > > * vms_unix_time.h: 1982, 1986 Berkeley software License Agreement > It seems also problematic to me since I believe at that time > it was the BSD incompatible with the GPL. Is this the ORIGINAL BSD license containing the ad-clause? Then, this is a non-issue, because the decan of UCB official announced not to legally enforce and to abandon this offending clause many years ago. Many BSD-derived works (comprising FreeBSD and NetBSD) have been using the decan's statement as justification to remove this clause from their sources. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 26 07:38:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 03:38:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207761] Review Request: xpdf - A PDF file viewer for the X Window System In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609260738.k8Q7cGa5004219@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xpdf - A PDF file viewer for the X Window System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207761 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-09-26 03:38 EST ------- Thanks, Ralf for the explanation. In fact in the xpdf source there is no licence file, only a BSD copyright, so the clause cannot be removed from the licence, but we can consider that it is not an issue. * rpmlint is silent * package rightly named * after removal of files with licence which seems GPL incompatible the package is covered by the GPL, included * spec legible * upstream source match - the following files match the upstrem source: 7b22f31289ce0812d2ec77014e7b0cdf xpdf-cyrillic-2003-jun-28.tar.gz 96e058c1b0429ae1ba0b50f1784b0985 xpdf-thai-2002-jan-16.tar.gz - the following tarballs were checked manually using a diff against upsteam source to check that only files have been removed: e53ec72546bb1a010fc2a2730f6d80f5 xpdf-3.01-novms.tar.gz ba4b037ab691f8b029ec2b9820a2fb8c xpdf-chinese-simplified-2004-jul-27-NOCMAP.tar.gz 697e7edc09a285115b597ab03f2eddf9 xpdf-chinese-traditional-2004-jul-27-NOCMAP.tar.gz f759b1b9624c7364e5d5a1ab3d146597 xpdf-japanese-2004-jul-27-NOCMAP.tar.gz 276624cddd1b70c29a3ae03ddb20fb3a xpdf-korean-2005-jul-07-NOCMAP.tar.gz * compiles and run in devel * BuildRequires look fine * no library * no translations * directory owning is right * %files section is right * docs don't affect runtime * desktop file correctly packaged It's incredible, but it is APPROVED! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 26 07:38:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 03:38:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207761] Review Request: xpdf - A PDF file viewer for the X Window System In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609260738.k8Q7cdxZ004279@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xpdf - A PDF file viewer for the X Window System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207761 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 26 08:25:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 04:25:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207532] Review Request: kbackup - Back up your data in a simple, user friendly way In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609260825.k8Q8PLCS009334@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kbackup - Back up your data in a simple, user friendly way https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207532 ------- Additional Comments From aportal at univ-montp2.fr 2006-09-26 04:24 EST ------- Well, I'll commit as is, but I'll wish to improve for the GNOME menu, so, if you know a better place in the menu than "Accessory", let me know. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 26 09:21:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 05:21:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208072] New: Review Request: brasero - Gnome CD/DVD burning application Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208072 Summary: Review Request: brasero - Gnome CD/DVD burning application Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: denis at poolshark.org QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com (project formerly known as "bonfire") Spec URL: http://www.poolshark.org/src/brasero.spec SRPM URL: http://www.poolshark.org/src/brasero-0.4.4-1.src.rpm Description: Simple and easy to use CD/DVD burning application for the Gnome desktop. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 26 10:13:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 06:13:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207676] Review Request: SDL_pango - Rendering of internationalized text for SDL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609261013.k8QADjAs018479@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: SDL_pango - Rendering of internationalized text for SDL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207676 ------- Additional Comments From matthias at rpmforge.net 2006-09-26 06:13 EST ------- Thanks a lot for the patch, it indeed supresses all the warnings. I've also changed to using DESTDIR... I missed that section of the guidelines somehow. For the buildroot and the *.a/*.la files, my personal preference is the way I've already put it. Thanks for pointing them out, but they shouldn't be blockers ;-) http://ftp.es6.freshrpms.net/tmp/extras/SDL_Pango.spec http://ftp.es6.freshrpms.net/tmp/extras/SDL_Pango-0.1.2-2.fc6.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 26 10:29:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 06:29:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207927] Review Request: supertuxkart - Kids 3D go-kart racing game featuring Tux In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609261029.k8QATWeL019312@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: supertuxkart - Kids 3D go-kart racing game featuring Tux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207927 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-09-26 06:29 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > OK - Spec is legible. > No, but ok Erm, how is it not legible? Any comments / suggestions to improve its legibleness are very much welcome. > Issues: > > 1. Perhaps 'images-leagal.txt' could be renamed 'supertuxkart-images-legal.txt' > just to make it easier to find if you unpack the src.rpm? (just a minor nit). Done > Has any move been made to get upstream to change images to make it more > distributable moving forward? > Yes now that there is an upstream once more I've contacted them about this and they are looking into this. > 2. Your provides and obsoletes don't look quite right to me. > Perhaps that should be: > > Provides: tuxkart = %{version}-%{release} > Obsoletes: tuxkart <= 0.4.0-6 > That won't work because then the Provides would be older then the Obsoletes making the package self obsoleting > 3. rpmlint says: > supertuxkart incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.4.0-5 0.2-1.fc6 > (the .fc6 doesn't need to be there, just the version... ) > AH my bad, I didn't update the changelog, fixed. Here is a new version with all this fixed: Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/supertuxkart.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/supertuxkart-0.2-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 26 12:22:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 08:22:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207782] Review Request: itpp - C++ library for math, signal/speech processing, and communications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609261222.k8QCMWeY026923@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: itpp - C++ library for math, signal/speech processing, and communications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207782 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2006-09-26 08:22 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) Two minor issues: 1. # rpm -q --requires -p itpp-doc-3.10.5-3.fc5.i386.rpm | grep itpp itpp = 3.10.5-3.fc5 AFAICT, itpp-doc contains devel-docs. Therefore, it probably should better "require: itpp-devel" instead of itpp. 2. Something seems fishy with the configure script wrt. atlas: On one hand it uses /usr/lib/atlas/lib* and /usr/include/atlas, on the other hand, it reports: ... External libs: - BLAS ........... : yes * MKL .......... : no * ACML ......... : no * ATLAS ........ : no ... ... I must be missing something ;) and a major one: IMO, the *.pc is still bugged. It contains this: ... Libs: -L${libdir} -litpp -lfftw3 -llapack -latlas -lblas -L/usr/lib/atlas -L/usr/lib/gcc/i386-redhat-linux/4.1.1 -L/usr/lib/gcc/i386-redhat-linux/4.1.1/../../.. -lgfortranbegin -lgfortran -lm -lgcc_s ... The references to -L/usr/lib/gcc/i386-redhat-linux and lgcc_s definitely are bugs. They must not be present inside of a *.pc. I am not sufficiently familiar with gfortran (My last real encounter with fortran dates back more than 15 years) to be able to judge on -lgfortranbegin and -lgfortran, but I am inclined to think the same apply to them. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 26 13:23:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 09:23:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208072] Review Request: brasero - Gnome CD/DVD burning application In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609261323.k8QDNkOX031747@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: brasero - Gnome CD/DVD burning application https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208072 ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at ameritech.net 2006-09-26 09:23 EST ------- Here's a quick items: 1. Why are you redefining %version? 2. Duplicate BuildRequires: glib2-devel (by gtk2-devel), libxml2-devel (by libgnome-devel), gnome-vfs2-devel (by libgnome-devel), gtk2-devel (by libgnomeui-devel), libgnome-devel (by libgnomeui-devel) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 26 13:41:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 09:41:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207077] Review Request: classpath-0.92 - Essential Libraries for Java In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609261341.k8QDfhra000526@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: classpath-0.92 - Essential Libraries for Java https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207077 green at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |green at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From green at redhat.com 2006-09-26 09:41 EST ------- I don't think packaging GNU Classpath as an independent package is a good idea. We discussed this a little on the fedora-devel-java-list. Your two reasons for wanting this packaged were: 1. To solve the ikvm-bundles-classpath-binaries problem 2. To build limewire We don't need this for [2], as per comment #4. For the ikvm problem, please just add the appropriate GNU Classpath source release as a SOURCE to the ikvm spec file, and build it as part of the ikvm package build. We're trying to keep JRE packaging consistent and, while I realize that IKVM is different in many ways, installing a stand-alone Classpath jar file is sure to lead to problems down the road. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 26 14:00:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 10:00:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204140] Review Request: libmtp - MTP client library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609261400.k8QE0CJt001948@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libmtp - MTP client library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204140 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-09-26 10:00 EST ------- > * The *.pc being shipped should "Require: libusb" > instead of hard-coding -lusb in Libs. It is likely that -lusb is only required for static linking, and if that is the case (it appears so to me), then a better fix would be to remove -lusb from Libs: and add: Libs.private: -lusb that way not all libmtp-dependant apps (using shared libs) will get needlessly linked against libusb. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 26 14:01:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 10:01:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208064] Review Request: courier-authlib - Courier authentication library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609261401.k8QE1eo6002178@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: courier-authlib - Courier authentication library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208064 mfleming+rpm at enlartenment.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mfleming+rpm at enlartenment.co | |m OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mfleming+rpm at enlartenment.com 2006-09-26 10:01 EST ------- As I maintain a local version (and have done for a while so I'll probably compare along the way) I'll pick this one up for review. The specfile does deviate from what FE expects, so cleaning it up completely is indeed a challenge. :-) I have noticed a couple of things: * Unless you're patching the init file, it defaults to enabled on boot. * There's a few BR's there that are redundant (gcc-c++, libtool) * The Epoch references in subpackage Requires: are probably not needed, * Have you considered for the userdb databases? (configure --with-db=db) - I just don't trust the default gdbm... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 26 14:03:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 10:03:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208064] Review Request: courier-authlib - Courier authentication library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609261403.k8QE37oN002312@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: courier-authlib - Courier authentication library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208064 ------- Additional Comments From mfleming+rpm at enlartenment.com 2006-09-26 10:03 EST ------- Oh, for comparison: http://www.enlartenment.com/packages/fedora/5/SRPMS/courier-authlib-0.58-1.fc5.mf.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 26 14:05:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 10:05:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208032] Review Request: HippoDraw - Interactive and Python scriptable data analysis application In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609261405.k8QE5FLZ002494@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: HippoDraw - Interactive and Python scriptable data analysis application https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208032 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 26 14:05:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 10:05:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208034] Review Request: HippoDraw - Interactive and Python scriptable data analysis application In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609261405.k8QE5WlT002537@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: HippoDraw - Interactive and Python scriptable data analysis application https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208034 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |163776 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 26 14:07:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 10:07:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187508] Review Request: acx-kmod-common - ACX100/ACX111 driver common files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609261407.k8QE75lN002648@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: acx-kmod-common - ACX100/ACX111 driver common files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187508 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |201449 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 26 14:10:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 10:10:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208072] Review Request: brasero - Gnome CD/DVD burning application In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609261410.k8QEAM8Y002977@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: brasero - Gnome CD/DVD burning application https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208072 ------- Additional Comments From denis at poolshark.org 2006-09-26 10:10 EST ------- 1. *bonk*. fixed 2. fixed. Spec URL: http://www.poolshark.org/src/brasero.spec SRPM URL: http://www.poolshark.org/src/brasero-0.4.4-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 26 14:19:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 10:19:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207818] Review Request: eds-feed - Evolution Data Server feed for Galago In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609261419.k8QEJMfb003834@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eds-feed - Evolution Data Server feed for Galago https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207818 bdpepple at ameritech.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 26 14:42:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 10:42:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208113] New: Review Request: freepops - a tool to get html mail through a pop daemon Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208113 Summary: Review Request: freepops - a tool to get html mail through a pop daemon Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: thibaud.mouton at gmail.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://perso.orange.fr/gollum-on-the-web/freepops.spec SRPM URL: http://perso.orange.fr/gollum-on-the-web/freepops-0.0.99-1.src.rpm Description: FreePOPsd is a daemon that acts as a local pop3 server, translating local pop3 requests to remote http requests to supported webmails. This version contains last plugins updates in a tar.gz separated archive and a script that allows to perform this update during %configure step. An init script is also provided in order to be more suitable to the FC5 distro. Here are the output of the last rpmlint version: W: freepops strange-permission update.sh 0775 A file that you listed to include in your package has strange permissions. Usually, a file should have 0644 permissions. E: freepops configure-without-libdir-spec A configure script is run without specifying the libdir. configure options must be augmented with something like --libdir=%{_libdir}. This package also build without any problem in Mock. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 26 14:44:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 10:44:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207793] Review Request: flite - Small, fast speech synthesis engine (text-to-speech) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609261444.k8QEij5k006616@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: flite - Small, fast speech synthesis engine (text-to-speech) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207793 ------- Additional Comments From green at redhat.com 2006-09-26 10:44 EST ------- The flite 1.3 patch here... http://homepage.hispeed.ch/loehrer/flite_alsa.html ...adds ALSA support. It seems to apply and build. Should you add it? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 26 14:47:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 10:47:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208113] Review Request: freepops - a tool to get html mail through a pop daemon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609261447.k8QElUBJ006900@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: freepops - a tool to get html mail through a pop daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208113 ------- Additional Comments From thibaud.mouton at gmail.com 2006-09-26 10:47 EST ------- The rpmlint error is due to a configure script which is not generated by autoconf but by the author himself. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 26 14:48:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 10:48:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207763] Review Request: ddd - GUI for several command-line debuggers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609261448.k8QEmtav007001@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ddd - GUI for several command-line debuggers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207763 jkeating at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2006-09-26 10:48 EST ------- Ok, approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 26 14:54:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 10:54:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207676] Review Request: SDL_pango - Rendering of internationalized text for SDL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609261454.k8QEsdV7007576@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: SDL_pango - Rendering of internationalized text for SDL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207676 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-09-26 10:54 EST ------- Well, I will do a full review for this package. 1. From http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines : * rpmlint - rpmlint is not silent. ----------------------------------------------------------- W: SDL_Pango wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/SDL_Pango-0.1.2/README W: SDL_Pango wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/SDL_Pango-0.1.2/AUTHORS W: SDL_Pango wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/SDL_Pango-0.1.2/ChangeLog W: SDL_Pango wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/SDL_Pango-0.1.2/NEWS W: SDL_Pango-devel wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/SDL_Pango-devel-0.1.2/globals_enum.html W: SDL_Pango-devel wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/SDL_Pango-devel-0.1.2/globals_eval.html W: SDL_Pango-devel wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/SDL_Pango-devel-0.1.2/index.html W: SDL_Pango-devel wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/SDL_Pango-devel-0.1.2/annotated.html W: SDL_Pango-devel wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/SDL_Pango-devel-0.1.2/globals.html W: SDL_Pango-devel wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/SDL_Pango-devel-0.1.2/globals_vars.html W: SDL_Pango-devel wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/SDL_Pango-devel-0.1.2/dir_000003.html W: SDL_Pango-devel wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/SDL_Pango-devel-0.1.2/struct___s_d_l_pango___matrix.html W: SDL_Pango-devel wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/SDL_Pango-devel-0.1.2/dir_000002.html W: SDL_Pango-devel wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/SDL_Pango-devel-0.1.2/_s_d_l___pango_8h.html W: SDL_Pango-devel wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/SDL_Pango-devel-0.1.2/doxygen.css W: SDL_Pango-devel wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/SDL_Pango-devel-0.1.2/files.html W: SDL_Pango-devel wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/SDL_Pango-devel-0.1.2/globals_type.html W: SDL_Pango-devel wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/SDL_Pango-devel-0.1.2/globals_func.html W: SDL_Pango-devel wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/SDL_Pango-devel-0.1.2/dir_000000.html W: SDL_Pango-devel wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/SDL_Pango-devel-0.1.2/struct___s_d_l_pango___matrix-members.html W: SDL_Pango-devel wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/SDL_Pango-devel-0.1.2/_s_d_l___pango_8h-source.html W: SDL_Pango-devel wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/SDL_Pango-devel-0.1.2/dir_000004.html W: SDL_Pango-devel wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/SDL_Pango-devel-0.1.2/_s_d_l___pango_8c.html W: SDL_Pango-devel wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/SDL_Pango-devel-0.1.2/dir_000001.html ----------------------------------------------------------- This is because these files have Windows-type end-of-file encoding. You should modify this by: ----------------------------------------------------------- set +x for f in `find . -type f` ; do if file $f | grep -q CRLF ; then echo "Fixing the encoding of $f" sed -i -e 's|\r||g' $f fi done set -x ----------------------------------------------------------- at the final of %prep. * Build root tag - Any reason not to change this to %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) ? Adding %(%{__id_u} -n) ensures that different users use different buildroots for rebuilding rpms. Well, however if you don't like this for some reason, let me know (I won't force this and this is not a blocker). 2. From http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines : = Nothing. 3. Other things I have noticed: * Well, SDL_Pango-devel-0.1.2-2.fc6/usr/share/doc/SDL_Pango-devel-0.1.2/doxygen.png is CORRUPTED!! I think this file should be removed for this version and you can report this to upstream. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 26 15:06:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 11:06:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207793] Review Request: flite - Small, fast speech synthesis engine (text-to-speech) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609261506.k8QF6hsM008461@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: flite - Small, fast speech synthesis engine (text-to-speech) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207793 ------- Additional Comments From faucamp at csir.co.za 2006-09-26 11:06 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > The flite 1.3 patch here... > > http://homepage.hispeed.ch/loehrer/flite_alsa.html > > ...adds ALSA support. It seems to apply and build. Should you add it? > > Thank you for the ALSA patch! I will apply it, build, and update the spec/SRPM. By the way, you mention on your site that you were unable to build shared libraries from Flite 1.3 - the SRPM above includes a patch that fixes this issue. You can also download the patch here: http://dialogpalette.sourceforge.net/extras/makefile_shared_objects.patch Cheers, -Francois -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 26 15:07:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 11:07:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208116] New: Review Request: oorexx - Open Object Rexx Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208116 Summary: Review Request: oorexx - Open Object Rexx Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: gemi at bluewin.ch QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://math.ifi.unizh.ch/fedora/spec/oorexx.spec SRPM URL: http://math.ifi.unizh.ch/fedora/5/i386/SRPMS.gemi/oorexx-3.1.0-1.src.rpm Description: Open Object Rexx is an object-oriented scripting language. The language is designed for "non-programmer" type users, so it is easy to learn and easy to use, and provides an excellent vehicle to enter the world of object-oriented programming without much effort. It extends the procedural way of programming with object-oriented features that allow you to gradually change your programming style as you learn more about objects. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 26 15:37:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 11:37:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206842] Review Request: seq24 - Real-time MIDI sequencer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609261537.k8QFbHXF010983@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: seq24 - Real-time MIDI sequencer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206842 ------- Additional Comments From gemi at bluewin.ch 2006-09-26 11:37 EST ------- * source files match upstream: b2c39dad73f803727c39c2e2e443ebdb seq24-0.8.7.tar.gz * package meets naming and packaging guidelines * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently * dist tag is present * build root is correct * license field matches the actual license * license is open source-compatible, license text included in package * latest version is being packaged * BuildRequires are proper * compiler flags are appropriate * %clean is present * package builds in mock (FC-5, i386) * package installs properly * rpmlint is silent * final provides and requires are sane: * package is not relocatable * owns the directories it creates * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't * no duplicates in %files * file permissions are appropriate * scriptlets update icons cache * code, not content * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package * no headers * no pkgconfig files * no libtool .la droppings I have two complaints: 1. I'd rather have the description in a non-personalized style. However you may do as you wish, it is not a blocker. 2. The dump command conflicts with the /sbin/dump command, although they are not in the same directory. I recommend renaming "dump" to "seq24-dump". The source code does not reference it, so this should suffice. Upstream should also be notified. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 26 15:51:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 11:51:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206842] Review Request: seq24 - Real-time MIDI sequencer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609261551.k8QFpqEW012174@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: seq24 - Real-time MIDI sequencer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206842 gemi at bluewin.ch changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |gemi at bluewin.ch -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 26 15:55:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 11:55:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207612] Review Request: zidrav - Zorba's Incredible Data Repairer And Verifier In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609261555.k8QFt9Rv012418@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: zidrav - Zorba's Incredible Data Repairer And Verifier https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207612 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-09-26 11:55 EST ------- Scott, will you * reassign this bug to yourself * change the bug status from NEW to ASSIGNED * have this bug block not FE-NEW (163776) but FE-REVIEW(163778) or FE-ACCEPT(163779) ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 26 15:57:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 11:57:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207612] Review Request: zidrav - Zorba's Incredible Data Repairer And Verifier In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609261557.k8QFv64a012544@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: zidrav - Zorba's Incredible Data Repairer And Verifier https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207612 scott at perturb.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 26 16:00:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 12:00:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207612] Review Request: zidrav - Zorba's Incredible Data Repairer And Verifier In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609261600.k8QG0EFT012865@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: zidrav - Zorba's Incredible Data Repairer And Verifier https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207612 bakers at web-ster.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |bakers at web-ster.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 26 16:00:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 12:00:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207612] Review Request: zidrav - Zorba's Incredible Data Repairer And Verifier In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609261600.k8QG0i8c012966@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: zidrav - Zorba's Incredible Data Repairer And Verifier https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207612 ------- Additional Comments From bakers at web-ster.com 2006-09-26 12:00 EST ------- Sorry for the delay there was some confusion with regards to my login. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 26 16:07:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 12:07:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206842] Review Request: seq24 - Real-time MIDI sequencer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609261607.k8QG77wW013448@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: seq24 - Real-time MIDI sequencer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206842 ------- Additional Comments From green at redhat.com 2006-09-26 12:07 EST ------- (In reply to comment #7) > I have two complaints: > 1. I'd rather have the description in a non-personalized style. However > you may do as you wish, it is not a blocker. > 2. The dump command conflicts with the /sbin/dump command, although they > are not in the same directory. I recommend renaming "dump" to "seq24-dump". > The source code does not reference it, so this should suffice. Upstream > should also be notified. Fixed. So, is this approved? Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/green/FE/devel/seq24.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/green/FE/devel/seq24-0.8.7-5.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 26 16:20:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 12:20:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207676] Review Request: SDL_pango - Rendering of internationalized text for SDL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609261620.k8QGKoKU014690@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: SDL_pango - Rendering of internationalized text for SDL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207676 ------- Additional Comments From matthias at rpmforge.net 2006-09-26 12:20 EST ------- 1. Good catch. For me on FC6, "file *.html" doesn't output CRLF, so the *.html files aren't getting fixed by your scriplet. I suggest this instead : find . -type f -exec dos2unix -k {} \; Adding dos2unix to the buildrequires of course. This also has the advantage of preserving the original timestamp. 2. :-) 3. Since it's such a small files, and instead of having a broken image when browsing the devel docs, I've added a proper doxygen.png as Source1. http://ftp.es6.freshrpms.net/tmp/extras/SDL_Pango.spec http://ftp.es6.freshrpms.net/tmp/extras/SDL_Pango-0.1.2-3.fc6.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 26 16:21:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 12:21:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207763] Review Request: ddd - GUI for several command-line debuggers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609261621.k8QGL19Z014725@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ddd - GUI for several command-line debuggers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207763 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-09-26 12:20 EST ------- Icon related snippets are missing (and they are now mandatory unless I'm wrong). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 26 16:30:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 12:30:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208064] Review Request: courier-authlib - Courier authentication library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609261630.k8QGUhUN015923@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: courier-authlib - Courier authentication library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208064 ------- Additional Comments From lists at forevermore.net 2006-09-26 12:30 EST ------- I left the init and userdb stuff as the default because that's what the upstream spec does (plus, the init stuff makes sense to me, and I've never had issues with gdbm stuff). Like I said, I don't want to maintain a separate spec (too much other stuff going on; I don't think I could do a good job at it), but am willing to clean up the upstream spec occasionally (which Sam accepted) to keep it as close to fedora's needs as possible. I can fix the BR and epoch stuff, but it's not worth it if I end up having to maintain an entire separate spec from Sam's. question -- if you maintain your own already, why not submit to FE? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 26 16:58:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 12:58:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207793] Review Request: flite - Small, fast speech synthesis engine (text-to-speech) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609261658.k8QGwrFd019351@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: flite - Small, fast speech synthesis engine (text-to-speech) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207793 ------- Additional Comments From faucamp at csir.co.za 2006-09-26 12:58 EST ------- Ok, rebuilt package with the ALSA patch included: Spec URL: http://dialogpalette.sourceforge.net/extras/fedora/flite.spec SRPM URL: http://dialogpalette.sourceforge.net/extras/fedora/flite-1.3-2.src.rpm Package built clean in mock on i386, FC5. No rpmlint output. > By the way, you mention on your site that you were unable to build shared > libraries from Flite 1.3 - the SRPM above includes a patch that fixes this > issue. Oops, didn't realize it's not your site... ;-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 26 17:08:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 13:08:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207676] Review Request: SDL_pango - Rendering of internationalized text for SDL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609261708.k8QH8JWx020399@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: SDL_pango - Rendering of internationalized text for SDL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207676 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-09-26 13:08 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > 1. Good catch. For me on FC6, "file *.html" doesn't output CRLF, so the *.html > files aren't getting fixed by your scriplet. I suggest this instead : > find . -type f -exec dos2unix -k {} \; > Adding dos2unix to the buildrequires of course. This also has the advantage of > preserving the original timestamp. Strange. Surely I cannot catch DOS html files by file as "file ?.html" does not show any sign of DOS file. Well, http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines forbids to use dos2unix, as "it fails on FC3". However, we wont't be able to release this on FE-3 and for this case, using dos2unix is not so bad idea as there are many DOS files. Well, I again rebuild the rpm to check it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 26 17:20:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 13:20:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204140] Review Request: libmtp - MTP client library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609261720.k8QHKsih021626@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libmtp - MTP client library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204140 ------- Additional Comments From triad at df.lth.se 2006-09-26 13:20 EST ------- Fixed all the review problems, by changing upstream and by fixing the spec: Spec URL: http://www.df.lth.se/~triad/krad/fc/libmtp.spec SRPM URL: http://www.df.lth.se/~triad/krad/fc/libmtp-0.0.20-1.src.rpm libusb is supposed to be dynamically linked so I have added Requires: libusb to the .pc file and removed -lusb -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 26 17:23:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 13:23:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207927] Review Request: supertuxkart - Kids 3D go-kart racing game featuring Tux In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609261723.k8QHN8e8021792@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: supertuxkart - Kids 3D go-kart racing game featuring Tux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207927 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-09-26 13:23 EST ------- >Erm, how is it not legible? Any comments / suggestions to improve its >legibleness are very much welcome. Sorry, that was refering to the Source files matching upstream. They don't, but thats due to removing those images, so it's ok. :) >Yes now that there is an upstream once more I've contacted them about this and >they are looking into this. Cool. >That won't work because then the Provides would be older then the Obsoletes >making the package self obsoleting Ah, I see. Pity upstream didn't start versioning at a higher N-V-R. ;( ok, all the issues I see are fixed in this new release, so this package is APPROVED. Don't forget to close this bug NEXTRELEASE once it's been imported and built. Also, don't forget to close out the old package with a dead.package file and so forth... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 26 17:29:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 13:29:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207793] Review Request: flite - Small, fast speech synthesis engine (text-to-speech) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609261729.k8QHTqWP022244@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: flite - Small, fast speech synthesis engine (text-to-speech) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207793 ------- Additional Comments From green at redhat.com 2006-09-26 13:29 EST ------- Please don't package static libraries. See... http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-2302ec1e1f44202c9cc4bcce24cb711266557ad7 Also, since the ALSA patch is non-trivial, I recommend creating and installing a README-ALSA.txt file or something like that to credit the author and point to the patch's web page. I'll do a review once these are taken care of, but since I'm not a sponsor we'll need somebody else to jump in. Thanks for submitting this, BTW. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 26 17:32:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 13:32:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204140] Review Request: libmtp - MTP client library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609261732.k8QHWsvS022487@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libmtp - MTP client library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204140 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-09-26 13:32 EST ------- > libusb is supposed to be dynamically linked I'd argue that Libs.private: -lusb should still be used, and both changes should be pushed upstream. This latter change isn't relevant here, since the static libs aren't being included. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 26 17:34:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 13:34:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207676] Review Request: SDL_pango - Rendering of internationalized text for SDL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609261734.k8QHYO8i022586@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: SDL_pango - Rendering of internationalized text for SDL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207676 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-09-26 13:34 EST ------- Umm... SDL_Pango-devel-0.1.2-3.fc6/usr/share/doc/SDL_Pango-devel-0.1.2/doxygen.png is corrupted again. Source1 is not corrupted, dos2unix corrupted png file. (Note: the original doxygen.png in tar ball is surely corrupted) Move the line: %{__install} -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE1} docs/html/doxygen.png to the last of %prep so that png file won't get corrupted or use: "find . -not -name \*.png -type f -exec dos2unix -k {} \;" (I think the latter is better for the case that upstream may fix png file in new release and installing other png file gets no longer needed) Other things are okay. ------------------------------------------------------ This package (SDL_pango) is APPROVED by me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 26 17:34:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 13:34:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207676] Review Request: SDL_pango - Rendering of internationalized text for SDL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609261734.k8QHYkpP022611@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: SDL_pango - Rendering of internationalized text for SDL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207676 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 26 17:55:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 13:55:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207473] Review Request: ruby-activerecord - Implements the ActiveRecord pattern for ORM In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609261755.k8QHtM1a024150@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-activerecord - Implements the ActiveRecord pattern for ORM https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207473 ------- Additional Comments From dlutter at redhat.com 2006-09-26 13:55 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > (In reply to comment #1) > > rpmlint says: > > E: ruby-activerecord script-without-shellbang > > /usr/share/doc/ruby-activerecord-1.14.2/README > > > > because it gets confused by the first line of the README. > > No it doesen't, README is installed executable... Ouch .. how embarrassing. Fixed now Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/dlutter/yum/spec/ruby-activerecord.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/dlutter/yum/SRPMS/ruby-activerecord-1.14.2-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 26 17:56:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 13:56:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206842] Review Request: seq24 - Real-time MIDI sequencer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609261756.k8QHuptO024259@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: seq24 - Real-time MIDI sequencer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206842 gemi at bluewin.ch changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From gemi at bluewin.ch 2006-09-26 13:56 EST ------- APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 26 18:05:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 14:05:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207473] Review Request: ruby-activerecord - Implements the ActiveRecord pattern for ORM In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609261805.k8QI5ksb025069@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-activerecord - Implements the ActiveRecord pattern for ORM https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207473 ------- Additional Comments From dlutter at redhat.com 2006-09-26 14:05 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > Is active_support really required? I don't see anything in the code that uses it. Yes, it is .. $sitelibdir/active_record.rb requires it and gets grumpy if it's not there. Since active_support modifies some of the core classes, users of active_record can (and should) expect those additional methods to be there, no matter how active_record was installed (tarball, gem, or rpm) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 26 18:15:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 14:15:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206842] Review Request: seq24 - Real-time MIDI sequencer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609261815.k8QIFbId025809@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: seq24 - Real-time MIDI sequencer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206842 green at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From green at redhat.com 2006-09-26 14:15 EST ------- (In reply to comment #9) > APPROVED Thanks for working on this! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 26 18:18:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 14:18:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208113] Review Request: freepops - a tool to get html mail through a pop daemon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609261818.k8QIIiWP026138@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: freepops - a tool to get html mail through a pop daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208113 ------- Additional Comments From thibaud.mouton at gmail.com 2006-09-26 14:18 EST ------- This is my first package, and I am looking for a sponsor. Thank. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 26 18:22:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 14:22:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208116] Review Request: oorexx - Open Object Rexx In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609261822.k8QIM1Lg026489@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: oorexx - Open Object Rexx https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208116 Jochen at herr-schmitt.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |Jochen at herr-schmitt.de OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From Jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2006-09-26 14:21 EST ------- Good: + Rpmlint of source RPM ok. + Local build works fine. + Rpmlint of binaries RPK ok. + Source in RPM matched with upstream. + Local execution of a simple text script works. + Mock build works fine. + Package contains license (CPLv1) in verbatin form. Bad: - rpmlint of install oorexx-libs produced a lot of Warning like: rpmlint oorexx-libs W: oorexx-libs undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/librxsock.so.3.0.1 RexxDeregisterFunction W: oorexx-libs undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/librxsock.so.3.0.1 RexxVariablePool W: oorexx-libs undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/librxsock.so.3.0.1 RexxRegisterFunctionDll W: oorexx-libs undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/librexxapi.so.3.0.1 TheNilObject W: oorexx-libs undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/librexxapi.so.3.0.1 RexxTerminated W: oorexx-libs undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/librexxapi.so.3.0.1 ProcessLocalActs W: oorexx-libs undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/librexxapi.so.3.0.1 _Z12ApiRexxStartlP9_RXSTRINGPcS0_S1_lP10_RXSYSEXITPsS0_ W: oorexx-libs undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/librexxapi.so.3.0.1 dlerror ... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 26 18:27:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 14:27:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207725] Review Request: sshfp - Generate SSHFP DNS records from knownhosts files or ssh-keyscan In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609261827.k8QIRdkE027174@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sshfp - Generate SSHFP DNS records from knownhosts files or ssh-keyscan https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207725 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-09-26 14:27 EST ------- It looks like you're in the process of updating the package; the spec link in comment 1 shows version 1.1.0-1. Let me know when you have a new package ready. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 26 18:32:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 14:32:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 173459] Review Request: initng In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609261832.k8QIWALQ027644@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 ------- Additional Comments From daner964 at student.liu.se 2006-09-26 14:32 EST ------- (In reply to comment #339) > Ask on fedora-extras-list about getting cvsextras membership back. *sigh* It's a wonder any packages at all make it into FE. On fedora-extras-list I got the suggestion that whoever sponsored me the last time could do it again. Gauret, you around? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 26 18:38:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 14:38:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207793] Review Request: flite - Small, fast speech synthesis engine (text-to-speech) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609261838.k8QIcOQw028391@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: flite - Small, fast speech synthesis engine (text-to-speech) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207793 ------- Additional Comments From faucamp at csir.co.za 2006-09-26 14:38 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > Please don't package static libraries. See... > I had been wondering about this, actually :-). Since Flite is largely aimed (by its original developers, anyhow) at embedded systems such as augmentative devices, it is not uncommon to link to the static flite libs (this is also probably why the "vanilla" upstream flite 1.3 does not create shared libraries) Personally I agree that static libs are usually not too useful (hence the separate flite-devel-static subpackage). The Fedora Packaging Guidelines makes provision for exceptions to the static libs-rule; does this package qualify? Anyhow, will implement suggestions, update and rebuild. Thanks for the feedback! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 26 18:52:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 14:52:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208169] New: Review Request: python-twisted-core - An asynchronous networking framework written in Python Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208169 Summary: Review Request: python-twisted-core - An asynchronous networking framework written in Python Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: thomas at apestaart.org QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://thomas.apestaart.org/download/pkg/fedora-5-i386-extras/python-twisted-core-2.4.0-3.fc5/python-twisted-core.spec SRPM URL: http://thomas.apestaart.org/download/pkg/fedora-5-i386-extras/python-twisted-core-2.4.0-3.fc5/python-twisted-core-2.4.0-3.fc5.src.rpm Description: An extensible framework for Python programming, with special focus on event-based network programming and multiprotocol integration. It is expected that one day the project will expanded to the point that the framework will seamlessly integrate with mail, web, DNS, netnews, IRC, RDBMSs, desktop environments, and your toaster. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 26 18:52:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 14:52:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207725] Review Request: sshfp - Generate SSHFP DNS records from knownhosts files or ssh-keyscan In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609261852.k8QIqdvO029809@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sshfp - Generate SSHFP DNS records from knownhosts files or ssh-keyscan https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207725 ------- Additional Comments From paul at xelerance.com 2006-09-26 14:52 EST ------- That's corect. I found a bug in generating the sshfp records. Spec URL: ftp://ftp.xelerance.com/sshfp/sshfp.spec SRPM URL: ftp://ftp.xelerance.com/sshfp/sshfp-1.1.0-1.src.rpm * Tue Sep 26 2006 Paul Wouters - 1.1.0-1 - Mistakingly ran the sha1() call on the uuencoded keyblob, which generated wrong SSHFP records. * Mon Sep 25 2006 Paul Wouters - 1.0.6-2 - Don't change VerifyHostKeyDNS in /etc/ssh/ssh_config anymore * Tue Sep 19 2006 Paul Wouters - 1.0.6-1 - Initial release for Fedora Extras -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 26 18:54:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 14:54:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208169] Review Request: python-twisted-core - An asynchronous networking framework written in Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609261854.k8QIs1jm030003@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-twisted-core - An asynchronous networking framework written in Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208169 thomas at apestaart.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |171543 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 26 19:00:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 15:00:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208009] Review Request: perl-Wx - Interface to the wxWidgets cross-platform GUI toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609261900.k8QJ0oJv030509@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Wx - Interface to the wxWidgets cross-platform GUI toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208009 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-09-26 15:00 EST ------- This failed to build for me in mock. I have the set of unpushed packages set up as a repository, and perl-Alien-wxWidgets was installed properly. Yet: + /usr/bin/perl Makefile.PL INSTALLDIRS=vendor 'OPTIMIZE=-O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64 -mtune=generic' Warning: prerequisite Alien::wxWidgets 0.15 not found. and later: ==> Your Makefile has been rebuilt. <== ==> Please rerun the make command. <== false make: *** [Makefile] Error 1 error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.98362 (%build) I'll attach the full build log. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 26 19:05:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 15:05:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190343] Review Request: VDR - Video Disk Recorder In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609261905.k8QJ5PlU030843@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: VDR - Video Disk Recorder https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190343 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2006-09-26 15:05 EST ------- http://cachalot.mine.nu/5/SRPMS/vdr.spec http://cachalot.mine.nu/5/SRPMS/vdr-1.4.3-1.src.rpm * Sat Sep 23 2006 Ville Skytt? - 1.4.3-1 - 1.4.3, 1.4.2-1.ds, liemikuutio 1.12. * Sun Sep 3 2006 Ville Skytt? - 1.4.2-2 - 1.4.2-1, liemikuutio 1.10. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 26 19:05:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 15:05:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208009] Review Request: perl-Wx - Interface to the wxWidgets cross-platform GUI toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609261905.k8QJ5hOG030914@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Wx - Interface to the wxWidgets cross-platform GUI toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208009 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-09-26 15:05 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=137162) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=137162&action=view) Log from failing mock build -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 26 19:07:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 15:07:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190345] Review Request: vdr-femon - DVB frontend status monitor plugin for VDR In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609261907.k8QJ704o031062@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vdr-femon - DVB frontend status monitor plugin for VDR https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190345 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2006-09-26 15:06 EST ------- http://cachalot.mine.nu/5/SRPMS/vdr-femon.spec http://cachalot.mine.nu/5/SRPMS/vdr-femon-1.1.0-1.src.rpm * Sat Sep 23 2006 Ville Skytt? - 1.1.0-1 - 1.1.0, build for VDR 1.4.3. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 26 19:17:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 15:17:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207793] Review Request: flite - Small, fast speech synthesis engine (text-to-speech) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609261917.k8QJH9aD032192@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: flite - Small, fast speech synthesis engine (text-to-speech) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207793 ------- Additional Comments From green at redhat.com 2006-09-26 15:17 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > Personally I agree that static libs are usually not too useful (hence the > separate flite-devel-static subpackage). The Fedora Packaging Guidelines makes > provision for exceptions to the static libs-rule; does this package qualify? I don't think so. Shared libraries have the advantage that bug/security fix updates are automatically made available to users of those shared libraries. Static linking hides these dependencies. I can't think of any exceptional reason to override this thinking for flite. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 26 19:56:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 15:56:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207793] Review Request: flite - Small, fast speech synthesis engine (text-to-speech) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609261956.k8QJucLI002717@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: flite - Small, fast speech synthesis engine (text-to-speech) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207793 ------- Additional Comments From faucamp at csir.co.za 2006-09-26 15:56 EST ------- New build: Spec URL: http://dialogpalette.sourceforge.net/extras/fedora/flite.spec SRPM URL: http://dialogpalette.sourceforge.net/extras/fedora/flite-1.3-3.src.rpm Changes: - Added README-ALSA.txt - Removed subpackage: flite-devel-static - Modified shared libraries patch to prevent building static libraries -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 26 20:12:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 16:12:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208169] Review Request: python-twisted-core - An asynchronous networking framework written in Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609262012.k8QKCTxk004199@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-twisted-core - An asynchronous networking framework written in Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208169 paul at city-fan.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |207265 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 26 20:12:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 16:12:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207265] Review Request: python-zope-interface - Zope interfaces package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609262012.k8QKCfpd004211@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-zope-interface - Zope interfaces package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207265 paul at city-fan.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |208169 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 26 20:35:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 16:35:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207793] Review Request: flite - Small, fast speech synthesis engine (text-to-speech) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609262035.k8QKZk2g005945@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: flite - Small, fast speech synthesis engine (text-to-speech) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207793 ------- Additional Comments From green at redhat.com 2006-09-26 16:35 EST ------- You need a sponsor. If it were up to me, I would approve this. * source files match upstream: ae0aca1cb7b4801f4372f3a75a9e52b5 flite-1.3-release.tar.gz * package meets naming and packaging guidelines * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently * dist tag is present * build root is correct * license field matches the actual license * license is open source-compatible, license text included in package * latest version is being packaged * BuildRequires are proper * compiler flags are appropriate * %clean is present * package builds in mock (FC-5, i386) * package installs properly * rpmlint is silent * final provides and requires are sane * package is not relocatable * owns the directories it creates * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't * no duplicates in %files * file permissions are appropriate * scriptlets are good * code, not content * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package * no libtool .la droppings -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 26 20:36:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 16:36:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204140] Review Request: libmtp - MTP client library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609262036.k8QKawdm006157@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libmtp - MTP client library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204140 ------- Additional Comments From triad at df.lth.se 2006-09-26 16:36 EST ------- OK I've changed it in upstream, seeing the point. However it's not in Fedora Extras guidelines right now so shouldn't be holding up the review I hope. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 26 20:42:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 16:42:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204140] Review Request: libmtp - MTP client library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609262042.k8QKgdMs006530@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libmtp - MTP client library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204140 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-09-26 16:42 EST ------- > OK I've changed it in upstream, seeing the point. Fabulous. > shouldn't be holding up the review I hope nope. Just make Kevin happy. (: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 26 20:49:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 16:49:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208004] Review Request: perl-Test-Perl-Critic - Use Perl::Critic in test programs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609262049.k8QKnXfM007231@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-Perl-Critic - Use Perl::Critic in test programs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208004 jpo at di.uminho.pt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From jpo at di.uminho.pt 2006-09-26 16:49 EST ------- Thanks for the review. Imported and built for FC-5 and devel. jpo -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 26 20:50:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 16:50:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208116] Review Request: oorexx - Open Object Rexx In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609262050.k8QKoGEm007278@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: oorexx - Open Object Rexx https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208116 ------- Additional Comments From gemi at bluewin.ch 2006-09-26 16:50 EST ------- My version of rpmlint (0.78) doesn't show any warnings or errors at all. However, I found the following: http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2006-September/msg00173.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 26 21:10:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 17:10:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208116] Review Request: oorexx - Open Object Rexx In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609262110.k8QLADxK008703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: oorexx - Open Object Rexx https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208116 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2006-09-26 17:10 EST ------- rpmlint checks undefined non-weak symbols only for installed packages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 26 21:55:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 17:55:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187706] Review Request: alsa-oss - Userspace OSS emulation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609262155.k8QLtVGh012444@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: alsa-oss - Userspace OSS emulation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187706 denis at poolshark.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |denis at poolshark.org OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From denis at poolshark.org 2006-09-26 17:55 EST ------- Could you provide an updated version to 1.0.12 ? some quick nitpicks, before i do a more in-depth review: W: alsa-oss mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 1, tab: line 3) W: alsa-oss-devel summary-not-capitalized alsa-oss headers thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 26 21:58:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 17:58:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 173459] Review Request: initng In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609262158.k8QLw4Wv012598@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 ------- Additional Comments From gauret at free.fr 2006-09-26 17:57 EST ------- Yes, I'm around. But since Enrico reviewed your package, it would be best for him to sponsor you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 26 22:34:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 18:34:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208200] New: Review Request: toped - IC Layout Editor Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208200 Summary: Review Request: toped - IC Layout Editor Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cgoorah at yahoo.com.au QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com SPEC: http://chitlesh.funpic.de/rpm/toped.spec SRPM: http://chitlesh.funpic.de/rpm/toped-0.8.1-1.src.rpm Description: Toped is an open source cross-platform IC layout editor, based on openGL and wxWidgets. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 26 22:37:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 18:37:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208200] Review Request: toped - IC Layout Editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609262237.k8QMbuco015120@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: toped - IC Layout Editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208200 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2006-09-26 18:37 EST ------- Upstream has been contacted and will be releasing an icon for Gnome/KDE menus. I've left touch --no-create %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor || : %{_bindir}/gtk-update-icon-cache --quiet %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor || : in both %post and %postun, hoping to receive the icon soon. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 26 22:41:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 18:41:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207763] Review Request: ddd - GUI for several command-line debuggers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609262241.k8QMfDMZ015384@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ddd - GUI for several command-line debuggers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207763 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-09-26 18:41 EST ------- Some issues with that package (some are blockers, other are minor but most are serious): * spec should be utf8 encoded * missing Requires for proper functionning: gdb, /usr/bin/xfontsel, xterm, gnuplot and an html viewer, I propose htmlview * html viewing (in Help->DDD WWW Page) is broken for me, since konqueror is used but incorrectly called. a possible fix would be to Requires: htmlview, and then make a patch such that in the installed Ddd file in /usr/share/ddd-3.3.11/ddd/Ddd there is Ddd*wwwCommand: \ htmlview @URL@ instead of the default broken list * desktop category X-Red-Hat-Extra should be removed * Many interesting files missing from %docs. * instead of patching configure.ac and rerunning autotools (and doing it implicitly, wich is bad) a diff to configure should be better. I attach a simple one. * It seems to me that defaults come from Ddd.in, currently installed at /usr/share/ddd-3.3.11/ddd/Ddd so the programs required by ddd should be detected by ./configure, and therefore in BuildRequires. gdb is a fallback, xterm is a fallback but the following are tested: xterm kterm dtterm hpterm xfontsel is the fallback. You should make sure that builds are reproducible even if additional packages are required for the buildrequires but at the same time you may also want to avoid unneeded buildrequires. You can even change the defaults, and even patch configure for their detection (and adapt Requires asked above accordingly). * /usr/share/ddd-3.3.11/ddd/Ddd is a config file. In the INSTALL file, however, unless I didn't understood it right, it is warned against letting it under the user control because it may change between version. I don't have a firm opinion on that subject. Maybe it could be left where it is and flagged with %config? maybe it could be moved to %_sysconfdir, but not to the app-default dir? (it seems to be find by ddd/resources.C: static string own_app_defaults_file = resolvePath(string(ddd_NAME) + "/" + app_class); and if not there the standard X app-default file is tried). Maybe the best thing would be to do a directory in sysconfdir with %{name}-%{version} and put Ddd in it, and change the code such that resolvePath isn'called and instead a modified version that looks in HOME, then in sysconfdir/ddd-3.3.11/. * it would be possible to BuildRequire readline-devel and pass --with flag to configure, I don't know the implications though. * --disable-dependency-tracking could be passed to configure I tried to have a look at theme stuff and vsl stuff, it didn't seemed to work for me, but I am not a ddd user. Maybe somebody who knows better ddd and vsl could have a look at what is required to have that part work properly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 26 22:43:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 18:43:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207763] Review Request: ddd - GUI for several command-line debuggers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609262243.k8QMhQvF015465@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ddd - GUI for several command-line debuggers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207763 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-09-26 18:43 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=137182) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=137182&action=view) modified xprint patch to patch onlt configure If this is applied, I think libtool don't need to be a BuldRequires anymore -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 26 22:54:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 18:54:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205075] Review Request: fwbackups - a user backup program, with support for automated backups and on-demand backups In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609262254.k8QMsQsw015822@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fwbackups - a user backup program, with support for automated backups and on-demand backups https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205075 ------- Additional Comments From s.adam at diffingo.com 2006-09-26 18:54 EST ------- I prefer to use %install because that way I can be sure that permissions, owner, etc are setup properly and also so that if I ever want to move or exlude something, it's easier to do that with copying everything in one command. Also, this way macros are in effect where as in cp it's static copying. Right now it's only python, but as fwbackups 1.43 or 1.44 comes out, it might introduce the need for arch-specific directories and therefore builds. As for the %install, I cleaned it up and also noticed I had a few bad GPL copyright notices in my files, and so I used that opportunity to clean that up, move the defaults file to /usr/share/fwbackups, and released fwbackups 1.42.1 - Now the issues should be fixed and the tarballs matching. Here's the new locations: Binary RPM: http://diffingo.com/downloads/fwbackups/fwbackups-1.42.1-1.noarch.rpm SRPM: http://diffingo.com/downloads/fwbackups/fwbackups-1.42.1-1.src.rpm Spec: http://diffingo.com/downloads/fwbackups/fwbackups.spec rpmlint is silent on both binary and SRPM. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 26 23:09:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 19:09:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192434] Review Request: compiz-quinn In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609262309.k8QN9XuJ016491@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compiz-quinn https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192434 terraformers at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |terraformers at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From terraformers at gmail.com 2006-09-26 19:09 EST ------- Some packaged beryl checkout to toy with would be great! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 26 23:13:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 19:13:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199108] Review Request: gutenprint: Printer Drivers Package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609262313.k8QNDQuj016654@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gutenprint: Printer Drivers Package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199108 mike at miketc.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mike at miketc.com ------- Additional Comments From mike at miketc.com 2006-09-26 19:13 EST ------- I get this error while trying to install your rpm on a FC6 test 3+ (rawhide basically).. Loading "installonlyn" plugin Setting up Install Process Setting up repositories Reading repository metadata in from local files Parsing package install arguments Resolving Dependencies --> Populating transaction set with selected packages. Please wait. ---> Package gutenprint.i386 0:5.0.0-0.11.fc6 set to be updated --> Running transaction check --> Processing Dependency: libgtk-1.2.so.0 for package: gutenprint --> Processing Dependency: libgdk-1.2.so.0 for package: gutenprint --> Processing Dependency: libglib-1.2.so.0 for package: gutenprint --> Processing Dependency: libgmodule-1.2.so.0 for package: gutenprint --> Finished Dependency Resolution Error: Missing Dependency: libgtk-1.2.so.0 is needed by package gutenprint Error: Missing Dependency: libgdk-1.2.so.0 is needed by package gutenprint Error: Missing Dependency: libglib-1.2.so.0 is needed by package gutenprint Error: Missing Dependency: libgmodule-1.2.so.0 is needed by package gutenprint -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 26 23:21:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 19:21:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199108] Review Request: gutenprint: Printer Drivers Package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609262321.k8QNLlC1016972@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gutenprint: Printer Drivers Package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199108 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-09-26 19:21 EST ------- In reply to comment #60: Do you have the extras-development repository enabled? gtk+ is in extras. It should pull it in. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 26 23:37:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 19:37:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199108] Review Request: gutenprint: Printer Drivers Package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609262337.k8QNbobX017887@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gutenprint: Printer Drivers Package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199108 ------- Additional Comments From mike at miketc.com 2006-09-26 19:37 EST ------- I was using extras-development, just that the server I sync against (I mirror it locally), isnt' updated or something. Renabling the mirrorlist and it downloaded the correct RPMs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 26 23:53:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 19:53:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206487] Review Request: jd - A 2ch browser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609262353.k8QNrpu3018633@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jd - A 2ch browser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206487 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-09-26 19:53 EST ------- Rebuild for FE-5 ended. Thank you for reviewing and approving this, again. Closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 27 00:12:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 20:12:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207612] Review Request: zidrav - Zorba's Incredible Data Repairer And Verifier In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609270012.k8R0CM6C019128@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: zidrav - Zorba's Incredible Data Repairer And Verifier https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207612 ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2006-09-26 20:12 EST ------- Scott, if it really is approved, please change it to blok FE-ACCEPT. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 27 01:06:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 21:06:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206836] Review Request: TurboJson - Python template plugin that supports json In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609270106.k8R16Kqd021198@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: TurboJson - Python template plugin that supports json https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206836 ------- Additional Comments From lmacken at redhat.com 2006-09-26 21:06 EST ------- http://people.redhat.com/lmacken/SPECS/python-turbojson.spec http://people.redhat.com/lmacken/RPMS/python-turbojson-0.9.9-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 27 01:06:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 21:06:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206836] Review Request: TurboJson - Python template plugin that supports json In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609270106.k8R16m5g021222@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: TurboJson - Python template plugin that supports json https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206836 ------- Additional Comments From lmacken at redhat.com 2006-09-26 21:06 EST ------- * Mon Sep 25 2006 Luke Macken 0.9.9-1 - 0.9.9 - Rename to python-turbojson - Own the %%{python_sitelib/turbojson directory - Install the EGG-INFO -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 27 01:43:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 21:43:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208208] New: Review Request: MegaMek - a portable, network-enabled BattleTech engine Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208208 Summary: Review Request: MegaMek - a portable, network-enabled BattleTech engine Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fitzsim at redhat.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://fitzsim.org/packages/MegaMek.spec SRPM URL: http://fitzsim.org/packages/MegaMek-0.30.11-1.src.rpm Description: MegaMek is a community effort to implement the Classic BattleTech rules in an operating-system-agnostic, network-enabled manner. This is my first package. I need a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 27 01:44:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 21:44:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208208] Review Request: MegaMek - a portable, network-enabled BattleTech engine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609270144.k8R1idBU022609@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: MegaMek - a portable, network-enabled BattleTech engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208208 fitzsim at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 27 01:54:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 21:54:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206836] Review Request: TurboJson - Python template plugin that supports json In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609270154.k8R1seUG022929@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: TurboJson - Python template plugin that supports json https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206836 ------- Additional Comments From s.adam at diffingo.com 2006-09-26 21:54 EST ------- '+' are the good things, '-' are the bad that need fixing: + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. - You don't have the COPYING / LICENSE files in your package or in %doc, I'm pretty sure you need to include those. - source files match do not upstream: You can no longer download 0.9.9, they're released 1.0 beta. - latest version is not being packaged (see above) + BuildRequires are proper. + rpmlint is silent. + owns the directories it creates. + doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + %clean is present. + no scriptlets present. + code, not content. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 27 03:18:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 23:18:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202496] Review Request: quodlibet - A music management program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609270318.k8R3IBSH028208@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: quodlibet - A music management program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202496 dakingun at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dakingun at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From dakingun at gmail.com 2006-09-26 23:17 EST ------- Hi, Almost a month since the packaging was approved, is there any reason this package has not been imported into FE tree yet? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 27 03:21:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 23:21:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202496] Review Request: quodlibet - A music management program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609270321.k8R3LBfq028445@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: quodlibet - A music management program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202496 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-09-26 23:21 EST ------- The packager has indicated on extras-list that he is currently quite busy. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 27 05:03:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 01:03:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204140] Review Request: libmtp - MTP client library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609270503.k8R53DjD001365@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libmtp - MTP client library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204140 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-09-27 01:03 EST ------- All the issues above seem to have been solved. This package is APPROVED. Don't forget to close this bug with NEXTRELEASE once you have imported and built it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 27 05:39:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 01:39:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207612] Review Request: zidrav - Zorba's Incredible Data Repairer And Verifier In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609270539.k8R5d4pV002938@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: zidrav - Zorba's Incredible Data Repairer And Verifier https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207612 bakers at web-ster.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 27 05:46:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 01:46:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202496] Review Request: quodlibet - A music management program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609270546.k8R5kTf6003201@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: quodlibet - A music management program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202496 ------- Additional Comments From jeff at ocjtech.us 2006-09-27 01:46 EST ------- Things are *starting* to slow up... I'll try and get a few moments in the next day or so to import the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 27 06:28:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 02:28:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202496] Review Request: quodlibet - A music management program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609270628.k8R6Sj8Q004930@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: quodlibet - A music management program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202496 ------- Additional Comments From dakingun at gmail.com 2006-09-27 02:28 EST ------- (In reply to comment #15) > The packager has indicated on extras-list that he is currently quite busy. Sorry, I missed that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 27 07:13:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 03:13:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187317] Review Request: mindi In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609270713.k8R7DajG007079@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mindi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187317 ------- Additional Comments From tadej.janez at tadej.hicsalta.si 2006-09-27 03:13 EST ------- Hi Bruno, Dennis! I've been watching this review request and the one for mondo (bug 187318) for a while and I'm really eager to see mondorescue become part of the Fedora project (Fedora Extras, in this case). The problem is, Fedora currently doesn't provide sufficient backup facilities in Core or Extras. Sure, we have rdiff-backup, duplicity, dump, tar, etc., but nothing can compare with mondorescue's simplicity and ability to do a disaster recovery bare-metal restore. I've been researching various linux lvm-capable bare-metal restore solutions and mondorescue is my best bet so far. Taking into account the aforementioned issues, we should try to be more flexible and respect the specific nature of bare-metal restore process and try to work together, especially if the current upstream maintainer and lead developer of mondorescue is taking time to package mindi and mondo according to Fedora Extras Guidelines. Best regards, Tadej -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 27 07:19:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 03:19:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207853] Review Request: tclabc - A Tcl interface and a Tk GUI to the ABC notation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609270719.k8R7JZhu007347@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tclabc - A Tcl interface and a Tk GUI to the ABC notation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207853 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-09-27 03:19 EST ------- Quick look: (In reply to comment #1) > + Mockbuild is successfull for i386 FC6 Really? I cannot rebuild this in mock. Executing(%prep): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.91772 + umask 022 + cd /builddir/build/BUILD + LANG=C + export LANG + unset DISPLAY + cd /builddir/build/BUILD + rm -rf tclabc-1.0.7.fc6 + /bin/gzip -dc /builddir/build/SOURCES/tclabc-1.0.7.tar.gz + tar -xf - + STATUS=0 + '[' 0 -ne 0 ']' + cd tclabc-1.0.7.fc6 /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.91772: line 33: cd: tclabc-1.0.7.fc6: No such file or directory error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.91772 (%prep) RPM build errors: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.91772 (%prep) %{?dist} should not be added in version but in release. * Well, tk requires tcl, tk-devel requires tcl-devel and tk, so BuildRequires tcl tk tcl-devel Requires tcl are all unnecessary. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 27 07:26:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 03:26:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207853] Review Request: tclabc - A Tcl interface and a Tk GUI to the ABC notation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609270726.k8R7Qkrp007794@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tclabc - A Tcl interface and a Tk GUI to the ABC notation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207853 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-09-27 03:26 EST ------- mtasaka, G?rard Milmeister has changed package and SPEC after i did revivew. I have that SPEC file which did not contained any dist tag. If you see my review i have clearly mentioned that - dist tag is NOT present Here is diff between those 2 SPECs --- tclabc_old.spec 2006-09-27 12:41:26.000000000 +0530 +++ tclabc.spec 2006-09-27 12:41:49.000000000 +0530 @@ -1,20 +1,20 @@ Name: tclabc -Version: 1.0.7 +Version: 1.0.7%{?dist} Release: 1 Summary: A Tcl interface and a Tk GUI to the ABC notation Group: Applications/Multimedia -License: GPL +License: GPL URL: http://moinejf.free.fr Source0: http://moinejf.free.fr/tclabc-1.0.7.tar.gz BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) BuildRequires: tcl -BuildRequires: tk -BuildRequires: tcl-devel -BuildRequires: tk-devel +BuildRequires: tk +BuildRequires: tcl-devel +BuildRequires: tk-devel Requires: tcl -Requires: tk -Requires: abcm2ps +Requires: tk +Requires: abcm2ps %description -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 27 07:32:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 03:32:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207853] Review Request: tclabc - A Tcl interface and a Tk GUI to the ABC notation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609270732.k8R7WSpC008186@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tclabc - A Tcl interface and a Tk GUI to the ABC notation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207853 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-09-27 03:32 EST ------- mtasaka, I also checked timestamps and filesizes of both SRPMS, one i have and the one that is online both are different. do u want MD5 checksum of that? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 27 08:09:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 04:09:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207853] Review Request: tclabc - A Tcl interface and a Tk GUI to the ABC notation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609270809.k8R895N5012281@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tclabc - A Tcl interface and a Tk GUI to the ABC notation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207853 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-09-27 04:08 EST ------- Hello, Parag: Well, anyway G?rard should upload new spec and srpm (with release tag incremented) to avoid confusion. You and me can wait for it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 27 08:15:54 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 04:15:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208200] Review Request: toped - IC Layout Editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609270815.k8R8FsnW012873@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: toped - IC Layout Editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208200 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-09-27 04:15 EST ------- I can see lots of undefined weak symbol complaint. W: toped undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libtpd_common.so.0.0.0 wxEVT_LOG_ERRMESSAGE W: toped undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libtpd_common.so.0.0.0 CmdList W: toped undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libtpd_common.so.0.0.0 wxEVT_FUNC_BROWSER W: toped undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libtpd_DB.so.0.0.0 Properties W: toped undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libtpd_DB.so.0.0.0 _ZNK5DBboxmlERK3CTM W: toped undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libtpd_DB.so.0.0.0 _ZN8SGBitSetD1Ev W: toped undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libtpd_DB.so.0.0.0 _ZN9polycross11segmentlistD1Ev W: toped undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libtpd_DB.so.0.0.0 _ZN8SGBitSet3setEt W: toped undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libtpd_DB.so.0.0.0 _ZN5DBbox9getcornerEh W: toped undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libtpd_DB.so.0.0.0 _ZN5DBbox7overlapE2TP W: toped undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libtpd_DB.so.0.0.0 _ZN5GDSin7GDSFile13SetNextRecordEht W: toped undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libtpd_DB.so.0.0.0 _ZN5DBbox8clipareaERKS_b W: toped undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libtpd_DB.so.0.0.0 _ZN5tedop11segmentlistC1ERKSt6vectorI2TPSaIS2_EEb W: toped undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libtpd_DB.so.0.0.0 _ZN2TPmLERK3CTM W: toped undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libtpd_DB.so.0.0.0 _ZN9polycross2XQD1Ev W: toped undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libtpd_DB.so.0.0.0 _ZN5GDSin9GDSrecord10add_real8bEd W: toped undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libtpd_DB.so.0.0.0 _ZN3CTM6RotateEd W: toped undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libtpd_DB.so.0.0.0 _ZN5GDSin9GDSrecord9add_asciiEPKc W: toped undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libtpd_DB.so.0.0.0 _ZN5DBbox9normalizeEv W: toped undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libtpd_DB.so.0.0.0 _ZNK5DBboxneERKS_ W: toped undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libtpd_DB.so.0.0.0 _ZN5GDSin7GDSFile19registerCellWrittenESs W: toped undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libtpd_DB.so.0.0.0 _ZN5tedop9SweepLineC1ESt6vectorI2TPSaIS2_EE W: toped undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libtpd_DB.so.0.0.0 _ZN5GDSin9GDSrecord9add_int4bEi W: toped undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libtpd_DB.so.0.0.0 _ZN5GDSin9GDSrecord9add_int2bEt W: toped undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libtpd_DB.so.0.0.0 _ZNK5DBboxeqERKS_ W: toped undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libtpd_DB.so.0.0.0 _ZN5GDSin7GDSFile16checkCellWrittenESs W: toped undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libtpd_DB.so.0.0.0 _ZN5GDSin7GDSFile8SetTimesEPNS_9GDSrecordE W: toped undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libtpd_DB.so.0.0.0 _ZN5tedop10EventQueueC1ERKNS_11segmentlistE W: toped undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libtpd_DB.so.0.0.0 _ZNK8SGBitSet8isallsetEv W: toped undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libtpd_DB.so.0.0.0 _ZN9polycross11segmentlist11dump_pointsEv W: toped undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libtpd_DB.so.0.0.0 _ZN9polycross2XQ10sweep2bindERNS_14BindCollectionE W: toped undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libtpd_DB.so.0.0.0 _ZN5tedop11segmentlistD1Ev W: toped undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libtpd_DB.so.0.0.0 _ZN9polycross11segmentlist9normalizeERKSt6vectorI2TPSaIS2_EE W: toped undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libtpd_DB.so.0.0.0 _ZN5DBboxaSERKS_ W: toped undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libtpd_DB.so.0.0.0 _Z8tell_logN7console8LOG_TYPEEPKc W: toped undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libtpd_DB.so.0.0.0 _ZN3CTMaSES_ W: toped undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libtpd_DB.so.0.0.0 _ZN9polycross14BindCollection11get_highestEv W: toped undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libtpd_DB.so.0.0.0 _ZN8SGBitSet5resetEt W: toped undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libtpd_DB.so.0.0.0 _ZNK8SGBitSet10isallclearEv W: toped undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libtpd_DB.so.0.0.0 _ZN9polycross11segmentlist15insertBindPointEjPK2TP W: toped undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libtpd_DB.so.0.0.0 _ZN16EXPTNactive_cellC1Ev W: toped undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libtpd_DB.so.0.0.0 _ZN8SGBitSetC1Et W: toped undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libtpd_DB.so.0.0.0 _ZN14EXPTNpolyCrossC1ESs W: toped undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libtpd_DB.so.0.0.0 _ZN12EXPTNreadTDTC1ESs W: toped undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libtpd_DB.so.0.0.0 _ZNK2TP4infoERSt19basic_ostringstreamIcSt11char_traitsIcESaIcEE W: toped undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libtpd_DB.so.0.0.0 _ZN8SGBitSet20check_neighbours_setEb W: toped undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libtpd_DB.so.0.0.0 _ZN9polycross2XQ5sweepEv W: toped undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libtpd_DB.so.0.0.0 _Z8tell_logN7console8LOG_TYPEERKSs W: toped undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libtpd_DB.so.0.0.0 _ZN5GDSin7GDSFile5flushEPNS_9GDSrecordE W: toped undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libtpd_DB.so.0.0.0 _ZN5tedop9SweepLineD1Ev W: toped undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libtpd_DB.so.0.0.0 _ZNK3CTM5toGDSER2TPRdS2_Rb W: toped undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libtpd_DB.so.0.0.0 _ZN9polycross11segmentlistC1ERKSt6vectorI2TPSaIS2_EEh W: toped undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libtpd_DB.so.0.0.0 _ZNK2TPmlERK3CTM W: toped undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libtpd_DB.so.0.0.0 _ZNK3CTMmlES_ W: toped undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libtpd_DB.so.0.0.0 _ZN5tedop10EventQueue11check_validERNS_9SweepLineE W: toped undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libtpd_DB.so.0.0.0 _ZNK8SGBitSet5checkEt W: toped undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libtpd_DB.so.0.0.0 _ZN9polycross14BindCollectionD1Ev W: toped undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libtpd_DB.so.0.0.0 _ZN5DBbox4areaEv W: toped undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libtpd_DB.so.0.0.0 _ZN5DBboxC1Eiiii W: toped undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libtpd_DB.so.0.0.0 _ZN5DBbox7overlapES_ W: toped undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libtpd_DB.so.0.0.0 _ZN5DBbox6insideERK2TP W: toped undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libtpd_DB.so.0.0.0 _ZN9polycross2XQC1ERKNS_11segmentlistES3_ W: toped undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libtpd_DB.so.0.0.0 _ZN5DBbox7clipboxERS_ W: toped undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libtpd_DB.so.0.0.0 _ZN3CTMC1E2TPddb W: toped undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libtpd_DB.so.0.0.0 _ZN8SGBitSet6setallEv W: toped undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libtpd_DB.so.0.0.0 _ZNK3CTM8ReversedEv W: toped undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libtpd_DB.so.0.0.0 _ZN5tedop10EventQueueD1Ev W: toped undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libtpd_parser.so.0.0.0 CMDBlock W: toped undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libtpd_parser.so.0.0.0 LogFile W: toped undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libtpd_parser.so.0.0.0 _ZN8SGBitSetD1Ev W: toped undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libtpd_parser.so.0.0.0 _Z8tell_logN7console8LOG_TYPEERK8wxString W: toped undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libtpd_parser.so.0.0.0 _ZN7TpdTimeclEv W: toped undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libtpd_parser.so.0.0.0 _ZN8SGBitSetC1EPS_ W: toped undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libtpd_parser.so.0.0.0 _Z8wxGetAppv W: toped undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libtpd_parser.so.0.0.0 _Z8tell_logN7console8LOG_TYPEEPKc W: toped undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libtpd_parser.so.0.0.0 _ZN7console9TellFnAddESsPv W: toped undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libtpd_parser.so.0.0.0 _ZN7console10TellFnSortEv W: toped undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libtpd_parser.so.0.0.0 _Z8tell_logN7console8LOG_TYPEERKSs I don't know about this, however, something is wrong about linking against some libraries. Can you check what is wrong or contact with upstream? Also, some examples would be appreciated. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 27 08:16:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 04:16:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208200] Review Request: toped - IC Layout Editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609270816.k8R8GiWi012946@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: toped - IC Layout Editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208200 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-09-27 04:16 EST ------- Oops, undefined NON-weak symbols complaint, I meant. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 27 08:57:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 04:57:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199108] Review Request: gutenprint: Printer Drivers Package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609270857.k8R8vLvQ016345@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gutenprint: Printer Drivers Package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199108 caught at prodigy.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |caught at prodigy.net ------- Additional Comments From caught at prodigy.net 2006-09-27 04:57 EST ------- I'm using it now, works fine (I'm just using the drivers). What needs the gtk+ libs (nothing yet, of course), and can those files be put into a subpackage as well? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 27 09:18:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 05:18:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207612] Review Request: zidrav - Zorba's Incredible Data Repairer And Verifier In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609270918.k8R9Ii74017935@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: zidrav - Zorba's Incredible Data Repairer And Verifier https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207612 ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2006-09-27 05:18 EST ------- Imported and built for devel, FC5 branch requested. Thanks for the review! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 27 09:28:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 05:28:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207532] Review Request: kbackup - Back up your data in a simple, user friendly way In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609270928.k8R9S1BE018528@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kbackup - Back up your data in a simple, user friendly way https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207532 aportal at univ-montp2.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From aportal at univ-montp2.fr 2006-09-27 05:27 EST ------- %changelog * Wed Sep 26 2006 Alain Portal 0.5-6 - Link the good directories * Tue Sep 26 2006 Alain Portal 0.5-5 - Fix absolute symlinks Imported and built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 27 09:31:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 05:31:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 173459] Review Request: initng In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609270931.k8R9V3a9018731@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 ------- Additional Comments From daner964 at student.liu.se 2006-09-27 05:31 EST ------- Thanks Enrico. I'll commit to cvs and request a build as soon as I can (which I need to do from home because of corporate firewall). Also I'll include Enrico's selinux patch to upstreams. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 27 09:42:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 05:42:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187317] Review Request: mindi In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609270942.k8R9gDec019942@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mindi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187317 ------- Additional Comments From bruno at mondorescue.org 2006-09-27 05:42 EST ------- Thanks Tadej for the feedback. I've since March made a lot of modifications to both the spec files and also the code itself, so that mindi and mondo can integrate Fedora. And It has improved the project packaging and work. In 2.2.0, I'll add a mindi-busybox package, which will indeed remove the binary files from mindi. I hope it's a move well taken. What I can't do now is the ppc adaptation, as I said due to lack of hardware, knowledge, and incitation to so it, but I generally welcome patches. I hope to fix the latest bugs and publish 2.2.0 for the 8th of October. I'll then provide you a new build so that you can look at and comment. Bruno. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 27 09:59:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 05:59:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187706] Review Request: alsa-oss - Userspace OSS emulation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609270959.k8R9xtu3021982@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: alsa-oss - Userspace OSS emulation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187706 ------- Additional Comments From faucamp at csir.co.za 2006-09-27 05:59 EST ------- I'm not an official reviewer, but some review comments: * source files match upstream: 6bb04b5ca6c6f7eed4827bd054a4ddeff6fb4e99 alsa-oss-1.0.11rc3.tar.bz2 * not newest version: ftp://ftp.alsa-project.org/pub/oss-lib/alsa-oss-1.0.12.tar.bz2 * spec file does not use macros consistently: $RPM_BUILD_ROOT, ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT} and $RPM_OPT_FLAGS (See http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-f3d77b27a5d29dfc1f5600ef3fc836f2e317badf ) * -devel package has static libs and libtool archives specified in %files section (not packaged, though), see: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-2302ec1e1f44202c9cc4bcce24cb711266557ad7 * dist tag is NOT present * spec file named correctly * build root is correct * license field matches actual license, license is GPL, license text included in package * BuildRequires are correct * appropriate compiler flags present * %clean is present * package builds in mock (FC-5, i386) * rpmlint: alsa-oss SRPM: E: alsa-oss unknown-key GPG#f77eed90 W: alsa-oss mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs alsa-oss RPM: no output alsa-oss-devel RPM: W: alsa-oss-devel summary-not-capitalized alsa-oss headers W: alsa-oss-devel no-documentation * package is not relocatable * package installs properly * documentation is small, no need for -doc subpackage * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package * scriptlets are good * code, not content * -devel Requires correct -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 27 10:15:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 06:15:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193867] Review Request: klamav - Clam Anti-Virus on the KDE Desktop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609271015.k8RAFZdk023384@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: klamav - Clam Anti-Virus on the KDE Desktop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193867 ------- Additional Comments From andy at smile.org.ua 2006-09-27 06:15 EST ------- Updated file here: ftp://andriy.asplinux.com.ua/pub/people/andy/extras/klamav-0.38-3.src.rpm * Wed Sep 27 2006 Andy Shevchenko 0.38-3 - drop zlib-devel and bzip2-devel - require clamav-update - remove condition check from post scriptlets - satisfy rpmlint claim on debuginfo subpackage - fix Tefminal value in desktop-file - do not ship NEWS file due to is empty -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 27 10:36:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 06:36:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208200] Review Request: toped - IC Layout Editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609271036.k8RAaJpD025043@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: toped - IC Layout Editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208200 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2006-09-27 06:36 EST ------- For some reason, I don't have these on my rpmlint output. Did you only rpmlint my srpm package or you have rebuilt and rpmlint ? I know you are running rawhide Mamuro, maybe these output comes from rpmlint my FC5 built srpm. Updated: SPEC: http://chitlesh.funpic.de/rpm/toped.spec SRPM: http://chitlesh.funpic.de/rpm/toped-0.8.1-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 27 10:51:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 06:51:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208200] Review Request: toped - IC Layout Editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609271051.k8RApnH6026130@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: toped - IC Layout Editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208200 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-09-27 06:51 EST ------- Before checking 0.8.1-2; Well, in fact I did not get the rpmlint complaint (in comment #2) by "rpmlint toped-0.8.1-1.fc6.i386.rpm". However, when I once install toped and check this by "rpmlint toped" (I knew it recently that rpmlint can be used for installed packages), those rpmlint warnings appear. I don't know why these rpmlint does not appear on binary rpm, however, these warnings are indeed _TRUE_ because: --------------------------------------------------------------------------- [root at localhost ~]# ldd -r /usr/lib/libtpd_DB.so.0.0.0 linux-gate.so.1 => (0xb7f33000) libglut.so.3 => /usr/lib/libglut.so.3 (0x006a4000) ................... libfreetype.so.6 => /usr/lib/libfreetype.so.6 (0x078a3000) undefined symbol: Properties (/usr/lib/libtpd_DB.so.0.0.0) undefined symbol: _ZNK5DBboxmlERK3CTM (/usr/lib/libtpd_DB.so.0.0.0) undefined symbol: _ZN8SGBitSetD1Ev (/usr/lib/libtpd_DB.so.0.0.0) undefined symbol: _ZN9polycross11segmentlistD1Ev (/usr/lib/libtpd_DB.so.0.0.0) undefined symbol: _ZN8SGBitSet3setEt (/usr/lib/libtpd_DB.so.0.0.0) undefined symbol: _ZN5DBbox9getcornerEh (/usr/lib/libtpd_DB.so.0.0.0) ................................ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- so something is surely wrong about linking libraries. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 27 11:01:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 07:01:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208200] Review Request: toped - IC Layout Editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609271101.k8RB1Vlt026748@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: toped - IC Layout Editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208200 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 27 12:02:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 08:02:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199108] Review Request: gutenprint: Printer Drivers Package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609271202.k8RC2vuw031205@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gutenprint: Printer Drivers Package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199108 ------- Additional Comments From ivanfm at os2brasil.com.br 2006-09-27 08:02 EST ------- I have tested the compiled drivers from repository (x86_64/fc5). Working fine on a canon ip3000/USB using ip4000 driver. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 27 12:32:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 08:32:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208250] New: Review Request: piklab - Development environment for applications based on PIC and dsPIC microcontrollers Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208250 Summary: Review Request: piklab - Development environment for applications based on PIC and dsPIC microcontrollers Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: aportal at univ-montp2.fr QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://linuxelectronique.free.fr/download/fedora/5/SPECS/piklab.spec SRPM URL: http://linuxelectronique.free.fr/download/fedora/5/SRPMS/piklab-0.11.3-1.src.rpm Description: Piklab is a graphic development environment for PIC and dsPIC microcontrollers. It interfaces with various toochains for compiling and assembling and it supports several Microchip and direct programmers. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 27 13:14:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 09:14:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208254] New: Review Request: pikloops - Code generator for PIC delays Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208254 Summary: Review Request: pikloops - Code generator for PIC delays Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: aportal at univ-montp2.fr QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://linuxelectronique.free.fr/download/fedora/5/SPECS/pikloops.spec SRPM URL: http://linuxelectronique.free.fr/download/fedora/5/SRPMS/pikloops-0.2.1-1.src.rpm Description: PiKLoop generate for you code to create delays for Microchip PIC microcontrollers. It is an useful companion for Pikdev or Piklab IDE. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 27 14:25:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 10:25:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208200] Review Request: toped - IC Layout Editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609271425.k8REPvcE009333@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: toped - IC Layout Editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208200 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-09-27 10:25 EST ------- Well, I asked on Fedora-Extras list how to deal with these complaints and it seems that these are NOT a blocker. However, I would try to remove these complaints (I may give up). Anyway it is better that you report this to upstream. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 27 14:47:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 10:47:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208200] Review Request: toped - IC Layout Editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609271447.k8REllCW011160@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: toped - IC Layout Editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208200 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2006-09-27 10:47 EST ------- Upstream has been contacted. Svilen, who is the upstream is already in Cc to this bug :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 27 15:02:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 11:02:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208200] Review Request: toped - IC Layout Editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609271502.k8RF2uHG012251@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: toped - IC Layout Editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208200 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-09-27 11:02 EST ------- (In reply to comment #7) > Upstream has been contacted. > Svilen, who is the upstream is already in Cc to this bug :) Thank you. I hope Svilen will solve this issue. ---------------------------------------------------------------- By the way (this is not for toped) same things are found for libgeda. [tasaka1 at localhost ~]$ rpmlint libgeda W: libgeda undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libgeda.so.26.0.0 load_newer_backup_func W: libgeda undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libgeda.so.26.0.0 arc_draw_func W: libgeda undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libgeda.so.26.0.0 line_draw_func W: libgeda undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libgeda.so.26.0.0 text_draw_func W: libgeda undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libgeda.so.26.0.0 x_log_update_func W: libgeda undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libgeda.so.26.0.0 net_draw_func W: libgeda undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libgeda.so.26.0.0 select_func W: libgeda undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libgeda.so.26.0.0 complex_draw_func W: libgeda undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libgeda.so.26.0.0 circle_draw_func W: libgeda undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libgeda.so.26.0.0 box_draw_func W: libgeda undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libgeda.so.26.0.0 do_logging W: libgeda undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libgeda.so.26.0.0 bus_draw_func W: libgeda undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libgeda.so.26.0.0 pin_draw_func W: libgeda undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libgeda.so.26.0.0 picture_draw_func W: libgeda undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libgeda.so.26.0.0 variable_set_func [tasaka1 at localhost ~]$ rpm -q libgeda libgeda-20060906-2.fc6 Would you also report this to upstream? (I also found this problem for a package maintained by me so I have to report to upstream, too) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 27 15:06:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 11:06:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193867] Review Request: klamav - Clam Anti-Virus on the KDE Desktop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609271506.k8RF66lA012467@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: klamav - Clam Anti-Virus on the KDE Desktop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193867 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2006-09-27 11:05 EST ------- One last thing :) - fix Tefminal value in desktop-file Correct this typo, It should be "Terminal". However I won't block this package because I'm sure you will update the package to 0.38-4, before committing to CVS, right ? This package has been APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 27 15:08:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 11:08:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193867] Review Request: klamav - Clam Anti-Virus on the KDE Desktop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609271508.k8RF8Bdh012669@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: klamav - Clam Anti-Virus on the KDE Desktop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193867 cgoorah at yahoo.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 27 16:39:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 12:39:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208169] Review Request: python-twisted-core - An asynchronous networking framework written in Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609271639.k8RGd3UC019506@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-twisted-core - An asynchronous networking framework written in Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208169 paul at city-fan.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |paul at city-fan.org ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-09-27 12:39 EST ------- First pass comments: 1. The files list is very long and results in lots of "File listed twice" warnings from rpmbuild. These could be fixed by removing these lines from the %files list: %{python_sitearch}/twisted/manhole/ui/*.py* %{python_sitearch}/twisted/manhole/ui/*.glade %{python_sitearch}/twisted/manhole/ui/gtkrc %{python_sitearch}/twisted/persisted/journal/ However, the whole %{python_sitearch} %files tree could be simplified down to: %dir %{python_sitearch}/twisted/ %{python_sitearch}/twisted/*.py* %{python_sitearch}/twisted/application/ %{python_sitearch}/twisted/cred/ %{python_sitearch}/twisted/enterprise/ %{python_sitearch}/twisted/internet/ %{python_sitearch}/twisted/manhole/ %{python_sitearch}/twisted/persisted/ %dir %{python_sitearch}/twisted/plugins/ %{python_sitearch}/twisted/plugins/*.py* %ghost %{python_sitearch}/twisted/plugins/dropin.cache %{python_sitearch}/twisted/protocols/ %{python_sitearch}/twisted/python/ %{python_sitearch}/twisted/scripts/ %{python_sitearch}/twisted/spread/ %{python_sitearch}/twisted/tap/ %{python_sitearch}/twisted/test/ %{python_sitearch}/twisted/trial/ 2. There is lots of unpackaged documentation in the doc/ directory. How about a separate -doc subpackage? 3. rpmlint output: E: python-twisted-core non-executable-script /usr/lib64/python2.4/site-packages/twisted/internet/glib2reactor.py 0644 W: python-twisted-core devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/python2.4/site-packages/twisted/spread/cBanana.c W: python-twisted-core devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/python2.4/site-packages/twisted/protocols/_c_urlarg.c E: python-twisted-core non-executable-script /usr/lib64/python2.4/site-packages/twisted/trial/test/scripttest.py 0644 E: python-twisted-core script-without-shebang /usr/share/zsh/site-functions/_twisted_zsh_stub The non-executable-script errors could be fixed by quick couple of seds in %prep: sed -i -e '/^#! *\/usr\/bin\/python/d' twisted/internet/glib2reactor.py sed -i -e '/^#!\/bin\/python/d' twisted/trial/test/scripttest.py The script-without-shebang error could be fixed by installing /usr/share/zsh/site-functions/_twisted_zsh_stub with mode 644 Not sure about the devel-file-in-non-devel-package warning; are these devel files or are they needed at runtime for something? Are they needed at all? 4. Strictly speaking the package should have a dependency on zsh for the ownership of the %{_datadir}/zsh/site-functions directory. I guess the "right" think to do would be to break out a separate -zsh subpackage for it, but that seems rather like overkill for one tiny file. Thoughts? 5. I think the URL for this package should be http://twistedmatrix.com/trac/wiki/TwistedCore, with http://www.twistedmatrix.com/ reserved for the python-twisted metapackage. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 27 17:16:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 13:16:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207047] Review Request: ed2k_hash - Ed2k file hash calculator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609271716.k8RHGET0022921@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ed2k_hash - Ed2k file hash calculator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207047 ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2006-09-27 13:16 EST ------- http://rpm.greysector.net/extras/ed2k_hash.spec http://rpm.greysector.net/extras/ed2k_hash-0.4.0-3.src.rpm But of course! I don't know how I missed that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 27 17:23:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 13:23:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201000] Review Request: libFoundation - A free implementation of OpenStep's Foundation Kit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609271723.k8RHNScn023243@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libFoundation - A free implementation of OpenStep's Foundation Kit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201000 ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2006-09-27 13:23 EST ------- After some consideration, I've decided to ask you to move /usr/include/extensions to, say, /usr/include/Foundation/extension. The name *is* too generic and even X11 has its extensions/ dir in /usr/include/X11. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 27 17:28:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 13:28:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 165932] Review Request: An SMTP Client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609271728.k8RHSW4O023558@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: An SMTP Client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=165932 ------- Additional Comments From sundaram at redhat.com 2006-09-27 13:28 EST ------- This package is already approved and has not been imported for a long time. I am going to close this in a week if this is not imported within that time frame. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 27 17:31:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 13:31:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204152] Review Request: orca - Accessibility replacement for gnopernicus In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609271731.k8RHV4Te023750@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: orca - Accessibility replacement for gnopernicus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204152 sundaram at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE CC| |sundaram at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From sundaram at redhat.com 2006-09-27 13:30 EST ------- This package has already been approved and imported into Fedora Core but this review report has not been closed yet. Closing it now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 27 17:33:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 13:33:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 165932] Review Request: msmtp - An SMTP Client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609271733.k8RHXfwR023955@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: msmtp - An SMTP Client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=165932 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: An SMTP |Review Request: msmtp - An |Client |SMTP Client -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 27 17:33:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 13:33:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207761] Review Request: xpdf - A PDF file viewer for the X Window System In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609271733.k8RHXjlg023974@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xpdf - A PDF file viewer for the X Window System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207761 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2006-09-27 13:33 EST ------- Built for devel, thanks for the thorough review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 27 17:41:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 13:41:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208254] Review Request: pikloops - Code generator for PIC delays In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609271741.k8RHfhqI024694@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pikloops - Code generator for PIC delays https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208254 ------- Additional Comments From Jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2006-09-27 13:41 EST ------- Good: + Rpmlint doesn't complaint source rpm. + Local build works fine. + Tar ball in source rpm matches with upstream + Local install/uninstall works fine. + Rpmlint of installed rpm doesn't complaints. + Programm starts properly. + Mock build works fine. Bad: - Debuginfo package is empty. - QT environment variable are not sourced. - Desktop file: the Categories tag should contain Application (wiki: PackagingGuidelines#desktop) - Missing dependancy on update-desktop-database for %post (package desktop-file-utils) - Missing dependancy on update-desktop-database for %postun (package desktop-file-utils) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 27 17:42:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 13:42:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207047] Review Request: ed2k_hash - Ed2k file hash calculator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609271742.k8RHgg93024735@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ed2k_hash - Ed2k file hash calculator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207047 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-09-27 13:42 EST ------- Okay. Please go ahead. -------------------------------------------------------------- This package (ed2k_hash) is APPROVED by me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 27 17:56:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 13:56:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207612] Review Request: zidrav - Zorba's Incredible Data Repairer And Verifier In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609271756.k8RHuaBK025496@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: zidrav - Zorba's Incredible Data Repairer And Verifier https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207612 rpm at greysector.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 27 18:09:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 14:09:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207047] Review Request: ed2k_hash - Ed2k file hash calculator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609271809.k8RI9chN026420@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ed2k_hash - Ed2k file hash calculator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207047 rpm at greysector.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2006-09-27 14:09 EST ------- Imported and built for devel. FC-5 branch requested. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 27 18:54:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 14:54:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208250] Review Request: piklab - Development environment for applications based on PIC and dsPIC microcontrollers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609271854.k8RIsNFs031518@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: piklab - Development environment for applications based on PIC and dsPIC microcontrollers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208250 ------- Additional Comments From Jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2006-09-27 14:54 EST ------- Good: + Local build works fine. + Local install/uninstall works fine. + Program starts without complains. + Tar ball in source package matches with upstream. + Mock build works fine. Bad: - Rpmlint of source package complaints: pmlint piklab-0.11.3-1.src.rpm E: piklab summary-too-long Development environment for applications based on PIC and dsPIC microcontrollers E: piklab unknown-key GPG#8d4d7450 W: piklab strange-permission piklab-0.11.3.desktop.typo-fr.patch 0600 W: piklab strange-permission piklab-0.11.3.x-desktop-fr.patch 0600 W: piklab strange-permission piklab.spec 0600 W: piklab mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 51, tab: line 3) - rpmlint complains on binary rpm: E: piklab summary-too-long Development environment for applications based on PIC and dsPIC microcontrollers W: piklab dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/piklab/common ../doc/common /tmp/piklab-0.11.3-1.i686.rpm.18087/usr/share/applications/kde/piklab.desktop: warning: file contains key "DocPath", this key is currently reserved for use within KDE, and should in the future KDE releases be prefixed by "X-" - Please use http://switch.dl.sourceforge.net/..., so spectool will work properly. - Qt environment variable was not sourced. - Duplicate BuildRequires: libart_lgpl-devel (by kdelibs-devel), fam-devel (by kdelibs-devel) - BuildRequires: gettext is missing (required to build the translations) - Rpmlint complains on installed package: E: piklab summary-too-long Development environment for applications based on PIC and dsPIC microcontrollers W: piklab dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/piklab/common ../doc/common //usr/share/applications/kde/piklab.desktop: warning: file contains key "DocPath", this key is currently reserved for use within KDE, and should in the future KDE releases be prefixed by "X-" -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 27 18:59:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 14:59:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208200] Review Request: toped - IC Layout Editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609271859.k8RIxlXS031971@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: toped - IC Layout Editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208200 ------- Additional Comments From s_krustev at tiscali.co.uk 2006-09-27 14:59 EST ------- Thanks guys for your input! I had a quick look ... One of the reasons seems to be that some global variables (always troubles with them) are defined in the main module and used in the libraries. They are certainly not that much though, so it should be something else as well. I'm on it and will get back as soon as I know more. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 27 19:51:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 15:51:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192311] Review Request: cobbler In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609271951.k8RJpAoi003592@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cobbler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192311 ------- Additional Comments From katzj at redhat.com 2006-09-27 15:51 EST ------- Sponsored you, should eb good to go for building -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 27 20:35:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 16:35:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207763] Review Request: ddd - GUI for several command-line debuggers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609272035.k8RKZjQ6007325@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ddd - GUI for several command-line debuggers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207763 ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2006-09-27 16:35 EST ------- OK, here's a new SRPM which fixes the following: - Enable readline support - disable-dependency-tracking - Mark Ddd as a config file (not very comfortable patching new config file behavor here) - add configure defaults to BuildRequires - add all program callout defaults to Requires - use icon cache scriptlet - rpmlint doesn't complain about spec not being utf-8 anymore (this was all thanks to Trond's last name having foreign characters back in 2003) - add lots of %doc files - use htmlview as default WWW viewer - don't use autotools, use new patch to prevent it - X-Red-Hat-Extra removed from desktop New SRPM: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/ddd-3.3.11-11.fc6.src.rpm New SPEC: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/ddd.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 27 21:20:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 17:20:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207077] Review Request: classpath-0.92 - Essential Libraries for Java In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609272120.k8RLKRGf011262@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: classpath-0.92 - Essential Libraries for Java https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207077 paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-09-27 17:20 EST ------- Fair enough. I'll withdraw the package from review. Thanks for the comments :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 27 21:29:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 17:29:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177512] Review Request: mysql-connector-net In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609272129.k8RLTOBi012870@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mysql-connector-net https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177512 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-09-27 17:29 EST ------- Spec Name or Url: http://www.knox.net.nz/~nodoid/mysql-connector-net.spec SRPM Name or Url: http://www.knox.net.nz/~nodoid/mysql-connector-net-1.0.7-8.src.rpm Fixes the above problems. "E: mysql-connector-net hardcoded-library-path in %{_prefix}/lib I think this is due to the core mono packaging?" Yes, for FC-5 until after FC-6 release when hopefully FC-5's version will be bumped "E: mysql-connector-net-debuginfo empty-debuginfo-package Why no debuginfo files? Other mono packages have them." Depends on the package - if there are standard .so files in there, then debug info is generated. Mono doesn't generate ELF debug info, so if it's a pure C# package, the debuginfo package will be empty "E: mysql-connector-net no-binary E: mysql-connector-net only-non-binary-in-usr-lib I think those can be ignored, as rpmlint doesn't know mono bins." Correct ;-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 27 21:33:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 17:33:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207853] Review Request: tclabc - A Tcl interface and a Tk GUI to the ABC notation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609272133.k8RLXqbL013261@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tclabc - A Tcl interface and a Tk GUI to the ABC notation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207853 ------- Additional Comments From gemi at bluewin.ch 2006-09-27 17:33 EST ------- This is the correct new srpm: http://math.ifi.unizh.ch/fedora/5/i386/SRPMS.gemi/tclabc-1.0.7-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 27 21:38:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 17:38:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207763] Review Request: ddd - GUI for several command-line debuggers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609272138.k8RLc6Ml013581@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ddd - GUI for several command-line debuggers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207763 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pertusus at free.fr ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-09-27 17:37 EST ------- * The files %{_datadir}/%{name}-%{version}/COPYING and %{_datadir}/%{name}-%{version}/NEWS are needed at runtime, they shouldn't be rm even though they are duplicates. * I think that COPYING.LIB shouldn't be shipped since there is no file covered by the LGPL (if I'm not wrong). * I think that libtool isn't needed as BR now. * libXmu-devel and libXpm-devel are dependencies of libXaw-devel. apart from the non-UTF8 warnings for info files, there is an error: E: ddd file-in-usr-marked-as-conffile /usr/share/ddd-3.3.11/ddd/Ddd I agree with you that it is sufficient and although it would be better to have Ddd below %_sysconfdir, this is something for upstream, and certainly not a blocker. When I start ddd I have the following warnings on the console: Warning: Cannot convert string "-*-symbol-*-*-*-*-*-120-*-*-*-*-adobe-*" to type FontStruct (Annoyed? Try 'Edit->Preferences->General->Suppress X Warnings'!) Warning: XmStringGetNextComponent: unknown type 164801264 Warning: XmStringGetNextComponent: unknown type 164801312 Any idea on what cause them, and how harmfull the corresponding issues are? (in general I tend to ignore such warnings, they are most of the time caused by something else than the package). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 27 21:40:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 17:40:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177211] Review Request: newsx - NNTP news exchange utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609272140.k8RLeOCp013757@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: newsx - NNTP news exchange utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177211 ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2006-09-27 17:40 EST ------- *ping*? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 27 22:00:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 18:00:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207763] Review Request: ddd - GUI for several command-line debuggers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609272200.k8RM0cJ6015512@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ddd - GUI for several command-line debuggers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207763 ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2006-09-27 18:00 EST ------- -12 has: - got rid of duplicate doc file removal - got rid of COPYING.LIB from %doc - no need for libtool BR - no need for libXmu-devel, libXpm-devel BR Dunno about those console warnings, I see them too, but they don't seem harmful (ddd works fine with them), and the program offers a mechanism for suppressing them. New SRPM: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/ddd-3.3.11-12.fc6.src.rpm New SPEC: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/ddd.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 27 22:44:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 18:44:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207846] Review Request: perl-Finance-YahooQuote - Perl interface to get stock quotes from Yahoo! Finance In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609272244.k8RMi5Ze020038@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Finance-YahooQuote - Perl interface to get stock quotes from Yahoo! Finance Alias: finance-YahooQuote https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207846 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |208348 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 27 22:45:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 18:45:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207077] Review Request: classpath-0.92 - Essential Libraries for Java In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609272245.k8RMjmcA020196@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: classpath-0.92 - Essential Libraries for Java https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207077 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |201449 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 27 22:53:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 18:53:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207846] Review Request: perl-Finance-YahooQuote - Perl interface to get stock quotes from Yahoo! Finance In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609272253.k8RMrcOc020829@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Finance-YahooQuote - Perl interface to get stock quotes from Yahoo! Finance Alias: finance-YahooQuote https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207846 ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2006-09-27 18:53 EST ------- Ok, I found the problem, see bug #208348 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 27 23:46:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 19:46:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177211] Review Request: newsx - NNTP news exchange utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609272346.k8RNkIrD023262@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: newsx - NNTP news exchange utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177211 s.adam at diffingo.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |s.adam at diffingo.com ------- Additional Comments From s.adam at diffingo.com 2006-09-27 19:46 EST ------- It builds fine in a mock here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 27 23:54:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 19:54:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208200] Review Request: toped - IC Layout Editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609272354.k8RNsUuq023554@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: toped - IC Layout Editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208200 ------- Additional Comments From s_krustev at tiscali.co.uk 2006-09-27 19:54 EST ------- OK, apart from the global variables there is a strange stuff related to the libtool. I don't know what's the exact difference between _LTADD and _LDADD but it seems that the first one links the somehow the module to the library and ldd can't see that dependancy. Didn't investagate further, by replacing the first line with the second certainly fixes all the remaining troubles ... well except a single one related to the wxWidgets top application object. This one will need a little bit more time So - I'll have to commit some changes in the packet. What is the best way to proceed further - shall I create a new tarball say 0.8.2? Chitlesh, it seems that the link to the srpm is broken -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 28 00:54:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 20:54:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199108] Review Request: gutenprint: Printer Drivers Package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609280054.k8S0sUJR026297@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gutenprint: Printer Drivers Package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199108 ------- Additional Comments From luya_tfz at thefinalzone.com 2006-09-27 20:54 EST ------- I rebuilt Guteprint for x86_64 system using mock and tested it with Epson Stylus CX4600. Guteprint immediately recognized the printer and set the right driver. With the old gimp-print, the closed driver was for Stylus CX3200. As a result, most of the configuration for CX4600 are available including the CMYK color setting. The noticeable difference is the improved speed of the printer and the bug that prevent a proper output of paper is fixed. I really hope this pacakge will make on Extras repository once rpmlint will be sorted as it dramatically improve the performance of the printer. Kudos for Epson for helping providing Linux support for their printer. Although it is too late to include it on Core repository, this package will definitively be available as default on FC7 and above. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 28 04:20:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 00:20:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199108] Review Request: gutenprint: Printer Drivers Package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609280420.k8S4KCLR005342@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gutenprint: Printer Drivers Package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199108 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-09-28 00:20 EST ------- Excellent to hear some positive testing reports both here and on the lists. In reply to comment #63: It looks like the libgutenprintui libraries in the main package need gtk libgutenprintui.so.1 libgutenprintui2.so.1 I don't know if they can be split off or not... Parag? Parag: - Can you apply something like the changes from comment #58 with a proper changelog entry and upload a new spec/src.rpm? - I just did another fc6/x86_64 build here and it worked. Either the problem I was seeing before was something that was temp broken in devel, or there is some kind of race condition in the build process that I managed to hit. - Can you also add '--disable-rpath' to the configure call? This shows up on x86_64 rpmlint as: E: gutenprint binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/lib64/libgutenprintui.so.1.0.0 ['/usr/lib64'] E: gutenprint binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/lib64/ libgutenprintui2.so.1.0.0 ['/usr/lib64'] E: gutenprint binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/ijsgutenprint.5.0 ['/usr/ lib64'] E: gutenprint-cups binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/sbin/cups-genppd.5.0 ['/ usr/lib64'] E: gutenprint-cups binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/lib/cups/filter/ rastertogutenprint.5.0 ['/usr/lib64'] E: gutenprint-extras binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/testpattern ['/usr/ lib64'] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 28 04:28:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 00:28:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199108] Review Request: gutenprint: Printer Drivers Package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609280428.k8S4S91C005825@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gutenprint: Printer Drivers Package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199108 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-09-28 00:28 EST ------- (In reply to comment #66) > Excellent to hear some positive testing reports both here and on the lists. Thanks to all whot tested this package. > > In reply to comment #63: > > It looks like the libgutenprintui libraries in the main package need gtk > libgutenprintui.so.1 > libgutenprintui2.so.1 > > I don't know if they can be split off or not... Parag? I don't think we should split them and create a new package. Those are part of gutenprint-devel package. And as all *.so.1 files must go to -devel packages, ther are already there. > > Parag: > > - Can you apply something like the changes from comment #58 with a proper > changelog entry and upload a new spec/src.rpm? Will do that later today. > > - I just did another fc6/x86_64 build here and it worked. Either the problem I > was seeing before was something that was temp broken in devel, or there is some > kind of race condition in the build process that I managed to hit. > > - Can you also add '--disable-rpath' to the configure call? This shows up on > x86_64 rpmlint as: > E: gutenprint binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/lib64/libgutenprintui.so.1.0.0 > ['/usr/lib64'] > E: gutenprint binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/lib64/ > libgutenprintui2.so.1.0.0 ['/usr/lib64'] > E: gutenprint binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/ijsgutenprint.5.0 ['/usr/ > lib64'] > E: gutenprint-cups binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/sbin/cups-genppd.5.0 ['/ > usr/lib64'] > E: gutenprint-cups binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/lib/cups/filter/ > rastertogutenprint.5.0 ['/usr/lib64'] > E: gutenprint-extras binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/testpattern ['/usr/ > lib64'] > Kevin, Sure will add --disable-rpath to ./configure in SPEC. So same %{_libdir} macro worked for x86_64 right in mock build?? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 28 04:44:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 00:44:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199108] Review Request: gutenprint: Printer Drivers Package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609280444.k8S4ibhd006733@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gutenprint: Printer Drivers Package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199108 peter at thecodergeek.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |peter at thecodergeek.com ------- Additional Comments From peter at thecodergeek.com 2006-09-28 00:44 EST ------- (In reply to comment #67) > > It looks like the libgutenprintui libraries in the main package need gtk > > libgutenprintui.so.1 > > libgutenprintui2.so.1 > > > > I don't know if they can be split off or not... Parag? > > I don't think we should split them and create a new package. Those are part of > gutenprint-devel package. And as all *.so.1 files must go to -devel packages, > ther are already there. Why should they be in the -devel subpackage? It was my understanding that only the unversioned shared object files must be in the -devel subpackage (*.so); and versioned libraries (*.so.N and so on) should be in the main package or a -libs subpackage or something similar, as appropriate. Is this not the case here? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 28 05:15:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 01:15:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199108] Review Request: gutenprint: Printer Drivers Package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609280515.k8S5FjBW008392@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gutenprint: Printer Drivers Package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199108 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-09-28 01:15 EST ------- Thanks peter, My mistake I forgot the following MUST - MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. Will Change SPEC and uplaod new package later today. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 28 06:04:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 02:04:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207853] Review Request: tclabc - A Tcl interface and a Tk GUI to the ABC notation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609280604.k8S64YcU010761@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tclabc - A Tcl interface and a Tk GUI to the ABC notation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207853 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-09-28 02:04 EST ------- I will review this later. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 28 06:58:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 02:58:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206839] Review Request: TurboKid - Python template plugin that supports Kid templates In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609280658.k8S6wW4q013516@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: TurboKid - Python template plugin that supports Kid templates https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206839 toshio at tiki-lounge.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From toshio at tiki-lounge.com 2006-09-28 02:58 EST ------- MD5Sums: 582b11e91d8c4369bdf2be424624d1e0 python-turbokid-0.9.8-3.src.rpm 35997fd4208f40279461b6a823a4e03f TurboKid-0.9.8-py2.4.egg a88645a5afc9b70685c977ac0afd7a5c python-turbokid.spec Good: * The three blockers have been fixed. * Tested with turbogears 1.0-0.1.b1 and proposed python-turbojson package and it runs a minimal test. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 28 06:59:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 02:59:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199108] Review Request: gutenprint: Printer Drivers Package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609280659.k8S6xZwk013622@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gutenprint: Printer Drivers Package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199108 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-09-28 02:59 EST ------- Peter, you confused me. I rechecked for .so files and found that rpm -ql gutenprint | grep so /usr/lib/gutenprint/5.0.0/modules/color-traditional.so /usr/lib/gutenprint/5.0.0/modules/print-canon.so /usr/lib/gutenprint/5.0.0/modules/print-escp2.so /usr/lib/gutenprint/5.0.0/modules/print-lexmark.so /usr/lib/gutenprint/5.0.0/modules/print-olympus.so /usr/lib/gutenprint/5.0.0/modules/print-pcl.so /usr/lib/gutenprint/5.0.0/modules/print-ps.so /usr/lib/gutenprint/5.0.0/modules/print-raw.so /usr/lib/libgutenprint.so.2 /usr/lib/libgutenprint.so.2.0.0 /usr/lib/libgutenprintui.so.1 /usr/lib/libgutenprintui.so.1.0.0 /usr/lib/libgutenprintui2.so.1 /usr/lib/libgutenprintui2.so.1.0.0 AND rpm -ql gutenprint-devel | grep so /usr/lib/libgutenprint.so /usr/lib/libgutenprintui.so /usr/lib/libgutenprintui2.so This clearly shows that packaging for gutenpeint is corret. isn't it? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 28 07:09:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 03:09:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199108] Review Request: gutenprint: Printer Drivers Package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609280709.k8S79K0q014147@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gutenprint: Printer Drivers Package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199108 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-09-28 03:09 EST ------- Kevin, If you check current SPEC i have commented some files to solve issue of having both gimp-print and gutenprint to be installed on same machine. And the patch you posted contains those files to be packaged. What should you suggest now? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 28 07:15:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 03:15:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206836] Review Request: TurboJson - Python template plugin that supports json In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609280715.k8S7F3iN014527@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: TurboJson - Python template plugin that supports json https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206836 toshio at tiki-lounge.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |toshio at tiki-lounge.com ------- Additional Comments From toshio at tiki-lounge.com 2006-09-28 03:14 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > - You don't have the COPYING / LICENSE files in your package or in %doc, I'm > pretty sure you need to include those. The Packaging Guidelines say that COPYING/LICENSE must be included if it's in the upstream package. Otherwise it should not be. (But you should ask upstream to provide one.) > - source files match do not upstream: You can no longer download 0.9.9, they're > released 1.0 beta. > - latest version is not being packaged (see above) Could you provide a link to that? I just took a look at the turbogears site and was unable to find a TurboJSON 1.0beta. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 28 07:19:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 03:19:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208200] Review Request: toped - IC Layout Editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609280719.k8S7JkT5014797@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: toped - IC Layout Editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208200 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-09-28 03:19 EST ------- (In reply to comment #10) > So - I'll have to commit some changes in the packet. What is the best way to > proceed further - shall I create a new tarball say 0.8.2? I think releasing new tarball is preferable so that non-Fedora users can use it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 28 07:30:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 03:30:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207763] Review Request: ddd - GUI for several command-line debuggers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609280730.k8S7Ucve015361@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ddd - GUI for several command-line debuggers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207763 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-09-28 03:30 EST ------- Now there are some files missing from %files %{_datadir}/%{name}-%{version}/COPYING %{_datadir}/%{name}-%{version}/NEWS Otherwise things seems fine for me (I don't post a summary, but I checked the review items). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 28 09:28:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 05:28:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199108] Review Request: gutenprint: Printer Drivers Package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609280928.k8S9S8F6022403@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gutenprint: Printer Drivers Package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199108 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-09-28 05:28 EST ------- Kevin, Kindly forget my last comment. Arghh its vey busy day today and that made me to read wrongly your patch. Actually i reinstalled my system and now i got my system back working again. Here is updated SPEC and SRPM location Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/pnemade/gutenprint/gutenprint.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/pnemade/gutenprint/gutenprint-5.0.0-0.12.fc6.src.rpm I have kept last version's SRPM online as it is. Can you please check whether this new SRPM is buiding RPMs for x86_64 properly?? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 28 09:48:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 05:48:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 173459] Review Request: initng In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609280948.k8S9mPqd024661@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 ------- Additional Comments From daner964 at student.liu.se 2006-09-28 05:48 EST ------- Ok. initng and initng-ifiles are now built against FE devel. I also requested a FC-5 branch for initng-ifiles. My problem now is that initng allready has a FC-5 branch since I erroneously imported initng 0.4.7 into cvs december last year. What do I do about this? Simply replace the files in the FC-5 directory with proper ones? Or request a new FC-5 branch? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 28 11:14:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 07:14:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188974] Review Request: mesa-libGLw - Xt / Motif OpenGL widgets In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609281114.k8SBEdHE030637@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mesa-libGLw - Xt / Motif OpenGL widgets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188974 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-09-28 07:14 EST ------- * The %build and %install section are broken. Indeed make don't seem to care about environment variables, and besides there aren't set to meaningfull values, especially in the build section. I'll attach a patch that simplifies %build and %install a lot. It should be tested on a x86_64, I only verified that it is right on x86, although LIB_DIR=%{_lib} is there to have things right. * pkgconfig don't seems to be used in the glw build, I think this BR should be dropped. * lesstif-devel allready requires libXt-devel * is it true that -devel don't requires lesstif-devel? * When linking, the -L are not needed because we link only against libs in default linker directories. no need to remove the dirs from PROGRAM_DIRS they don't exist anyway. The only one which could be removed is util, but it isn't there. I'll attach a modified mesa-6.5.1-libGLw.patch which implements that. * rpmlint has relevant warnings, but they are suppressed by the change in %build -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 28 11:16:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 07:16:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188974] Review Request: mesa-libGLw - Xt / Motif OpenGL widgets In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609281116.k8SBGDqg030760@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mesa-libGLw - Xt / Motif OpenGL widgets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188974 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-09-28 07:16 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=137304) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=137304&action=view) patch for spec file to simplify %build and %install -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 28 11:17:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 07:17:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188974] Review Request: mesa-libGLw - Xt / Motif OpenGL widgets In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609281117.k8SBHx7O030889@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mesa-libGLw - Xt / Motif OpenGL widgets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188974 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-09-28 07:17 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=137306) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=137306&action=view) remove -L from link, and leave non existent dirs in PROGRAM_DIRS This is a replacement for mesa-6.5.1-libGLw.patch -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 28 11:27:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 07:27:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208254] Review Request: pikloops - Code generator for PIC delays In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609281127.k8SBRfgD031997@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pikloops - Code generator for PIC delays https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208254 aportal at univ-montp2.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |alain.portal at free.fr ------- Additional Comments From aportal at univ-montp2.fr 2006-09-28 07:27 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > Bad: > - Debuginfo package is empty. What can I do? I don't kknow why it is empty. > - QT environment variable are not sourced. Why sourcing QT environment variable > - Desktop file: the Categories tag should contain Application > (wiki: PackagingGuidelines#desktop) I see a sample, not sure this is a MUST. > - Missing dependancy on update-desktop-database for %post (package > desktop-file-utils) > - Missing dependancy on update-desktop-database for %postun (package > desktop-file-utils) This BuildRequires is no more needed since FC5 http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets#head-de6770dd9867fcd085a73a4700f6bcd0d10294ef -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 28 11:46:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 07:46:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208250] Review Request: piklab - Development environment for applications based on PIC and dsPIC microcontrollers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609281146.k8SBkJtV001003@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: piklab - Development environment for applications based on PIC and dsPIC microcontrollers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208250 aportal at univ-montp2.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |alain.portal at free.fr ------- Additional Comments From aportal at univ-montp2.fr 2006-09-28 07:46 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > Bad: > > - Rpmlint of source package complaints: > pmlint piklab-0.11.3-1.src.rpm > E: piklab summary-too-long Development environment for applications based on PIC > and dsPIC microcontrollers I don't have this error with an uptodate rpmlint (0.78-1.fc5) > E: piklab unknown-key GPG#8d4d7450 This is my key, please import. > W: piklab strange-permission piklab-0.11.3.desktop.typo-fr.patch 0600 > W: piklab strange-permission piklab-0.11.3.x-desktop-fr.patch 0600 > W: piklab strange-permission piklab.spec 0600 OK. > W: piklab mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 51, tab: line 3) It seems to me to not be really important. > - rpmlint complains on binary rpm: > E: piklab summary-too-long Development environment for applications based on PIC > and dsPIC microcontrollers ideem above > W: piklab dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/piklab/common > ../doc/common I tried to get help about this warning, no real answer https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-extras-list/2006-September/msg00789.html > /tmp/piklab-0.11.3-1.i686.rpm.18087/usr/share/applications/kde/piklab.desktop: > warning: file contains key "DocPath", this key is currently reserved for use > within KDE, and should in the future KDE releases be prefixed by "X-" This is a KDE application. > - Please use http://switch.dl.sourceforge.net/..., so spectool will work > properly. prdownloads.sourceforge.net don't do the same? what spectool? > - Qt environment variable was not sourced. Why sourcing Qt environment variables? > - Duplicate BuildRequires: libart_lgpl-devel (by kdelibs-devel), fam-devel (by > kdelibs-devel) OK. > - BuildRequires: gettext is missing (required to build the translations) There is no translation in this package > - Rpmlint complains on installed package: > E: piklab summary-too-long Development environment for applications based on PIC > and dsPIC microcontrollers > W: piklab dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/piklab/common > ../doc/common > //usr/share/applications/kde/piklab.desktop: warning: file contains key > "DocPath", this key is currently reserved for use within KDE, and should in the > future KDE releases be prefixed by "X-" Idem above -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 28 12:07:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 08:07:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208396] New: Review Request: v4l2-tool - Tool to get webcam usage Information Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208396 Summary: Review Request: v4l2-tool - Tool to get webcam usage Information Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: panemade at gmail.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/pnemade/v4l2-tool/v4l2-tool.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/pnemade/v4l2-tool/v4l2-tool-1.0.2-1.src.rpm Description: This package gives v4l2 device information of webcam. This package can only be used with gspca and uvcvideo kernel modules. Though both kernel modules are not in mainstream kernel, you can direclty download those kernel drivers and can use on FC systems without problem. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 28 12:08:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 08:08:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208397] New: Review Request: foo2zjs - Printer Drivers Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208397 Summary: Review Request: foo2zjs - Printer Drivers Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: panemade at gmail.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/pnemade/foo2zjs/foo2zjs.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/pnemade/foo2zjs/foo2zjs-1.0.1-4.src.rpm Description: This package contains some more Printer Drivers that are not present in gutenprint package. I found some requests coming for HP 2600n, HP LaserJet 1500,1020,1022. So i decided to add and see this package in extras for those peoples. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 28 12:08:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 08:08:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208398] New: Review Request: luvcview - Webcam Viewer Application Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208398 Summary: Review Request: luvcview - Webcam Viewer Application Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: panemade at gmail.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/pnemade/luvcview/luvcview.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/pnemade/luvcview/luvcview-20060920-1.fc6.src.rpm Description: With new release of luvcview, i feel it got well matured to enter in Fedora Extras. New release now contains the most awaited feature of video recording from webcam. Though this viewer can only be used when you already have uvcvideo kernel driver installed, i don't think i should add uvcvideo package as BR. People can direclty grab kernel module source and install it. I am using this package since last 2 months without any problem on FC5 and FC6. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 28 12:14:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 08:14:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207676] Review Request: SDL_pango - Rendering of internationalized text for SDL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609281214.k8SCESwC002629@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: SDL_pango - Rendering of internationalized text for SDL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207676 ------- Additional Comments From matthias at rpmforge.net 2006-09-28 08:14 EST ------- I've made that last change (exclude *.png from the dos2unix run), imported the package, rebuilt it for devel and requested FC-5 branch. Please double check the CVS content, binary packages when they're available if you want, then we can close this entry :-) Thanks a lot for your review! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 28 12:15:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 08:15:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206836] Review Request: TurboJson - Python template plugin that supports json In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609281215.k8SCFlT5002709@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: TurboJson - Python template plugin that supports json https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206836 ------- Additional Comments From s.adam at diffingo.com 2006-09-28 08:15 EST ------- If you look at the Source0 line: http://www.turbogears.org/preview/download/TurboJson-%{version}-py2.4.egg %{version} is defined as 0.9.9, so: http://www.turbogears.org/preview/download/TurboJson-0.9.9-py2.4.egg If I type that in I get redirected here: http://www.turbogears.org/previewdone.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 28 12:28:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 08:28:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208397] Review Request: foo2zjs - Printer Drivers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609281228.k8SCSKhJ003366@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: foo2zjs - Printer Drivers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208397 ------- Additional Comments From dwmw2 at redhat.com 2006-09-28 08:28 EST ------- As I understand it, these drivers cannot be in Extras because they use jbigkit and that may be afflicted by patents. See http://bugzilla.livna.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1162 http://bugzilla.livna.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1167 I'm using these packages successfully with a KonicaMinolta 2430DL printer. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 28 12:29:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 08:29:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208397] Review Request: foo2zjs - Printer Drivers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609281229.k8SCTZPd003425@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: foo2zjs - Printer Drivers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208397 dwmw2 at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |dwmw2 at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 28 12:48:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 08:48:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208007] Review Request: perl-Alien-wxWidgets - Building, finding and using wxWidgets binaries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609281248.k8SCm2S6004507@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Alien-wxWidgets - Building, finding and using wxWidgets binaries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208007 ------- Additional Comments From jpo at di.uminho.pt 2006-09-28 08:48 EST ------- Why perl-Wx fails to find perl-Alien-wxWidgets ---------------------------------------------- This package is strange: it installs itself in arched directories even though not one of its files is binary (I forced the perl_vendorarch in the %files section when I first started packaging this in the past and forgot it). The current package (tagged as noarch) in the repos has the following content: ------ $ rpm -qpl extras/5/i386/perl-Alien-wxWidgets-0.21-1.fc5.noarch.rpm /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/ppc-linux-thread-multi/Alien /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/ppc-linux-thread-multi/Alien/wxWidgets /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/ppc-linux-thread-multi/Alien/wxWidgets.pm /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/ppc-linux-thread-multi/Alien/wxWidgets/Config /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/ppc-linux-thread-multi/Alien/wxWidgets/Config/gtk2_2_6_3_uni_gcc_3_4.pm /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/ppc-linux-thread-multi/Alien/wxWidgets/Utility.pm /usr/share/doc/perl-Alien-wxWidgets-0.21 /usr/share/doc/perl-Alien-wxWidgets-0.21/Changes /usr/share/man/man3/Alien::wxWidgets.3pm.gz /usr/share/man/man3/Alien::wxWidgets::Utility.3pm.gz ------ Dropping the line BuildArch: noarch from the specfile solves the problem but rpmlint will start complaining $ rpmlint perl-Alien-wxWidgets-0.21-2.i386.rpm E: perl-Alien-wxWidgets no-binary -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 28 13:25:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 09:25:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208250] Review Request: piklab - Development environment for applications based on PIC and dsPIC microcontrollers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609281325.k8SDPdWw006974@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: piklab - Development environment for applications based on PIC and dsPIC microcontrollers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208250 ------- Additional Comments From aportal at univ-montp2.fr 2006-09-28 09:25 EST ------- Spec URL: http://linuxelectronique.free.fr/download/fedora/5/SPECS/piklab.spec SRPM URL: http://linuxelectronique.free.fr/download/fedora/5/SRPMS/piklab-0.11.3-2.src.rpm %changelog * Thu Sep 28 2006 Alain Portal 0.11.3-2 - Remove duplicate BR - Fix files permissions - Improve download URL - Don't mis space and tab -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 28 13:59:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 09:59:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192311] Review Request: cobbler In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609281359.k8SDxXEg009767@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cobbler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192311 mdehaan at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 28 13:59:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 09:59:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192313] Review Request: koan In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609281359.k8SDxqaw009810@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: koan https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192313 mdehaan at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Bug 192313 depends on bug 192311, which changed state. Bug 192311 Summary: Review Request: cobbler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192311 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 28 14:26:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 10:26:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208254] Review Request: pikloops - Code generator for PIC delays In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609281426.k8SEQ63Z011953@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pikloops - Code generator for PIC delays https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208254 ------- Additional Comments From Jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2006-09-28 10:26 EST ------- 1.) Don't script the executables. Please use the gcc -g compiler flag. 2.) To be sure to compile with the right QT version. 4.) OK. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 28 14:29:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 10:29:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 173459] Review Request: initng In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609281429.k8SETDto012221@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 ------- Additional Comments From gauret at free.fr 2006-09-28 10:29 EST ------- I'd say simply replace the old files with the new ones. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 28 14:31:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 10:31:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208420] New: Review Request: conky - A system monitor for X originally based on the torsmo code Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208420 Summary: Review Request: conky - A system monitor for X originally based on the torsmo code Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: miker5slow at grandecom.net QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://errr.fluxbox-wiki.org/fedora_stuff/conky.spec SRPM URL: http://errr.fluxbox-wiki.org/fedora_stuff/conky-1.4.2-1.fc5.src.rpm Description: Conky is a system monitor for X originally based on the torsmo code, that has is very modular and has many features. It is very popular with *box users due to how light weight it is. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 28 14:36:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 10:36:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208116] Review Request: oorexx - Open Object Rexx In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609281436.k8SEaV2u013145@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: oorexx - Open Object Rexx https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208116 Jochen at herr-schmitt.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From Jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2006-09-28 10:36 EST ------- On https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-extras-list/2006-September/msg00830.html I read, that this should not blocked the approvement of the package. So I may APPROVE your package, if you will notify upstream about this problem. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 28 14:36:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 10:36:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191473] Review Request: kdiff3: Compare + merge 2 or 3 files or directories In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609281436.k8SEahgM013184@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdiff3: Compare + merge 2 or 3 files or directories https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191473 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-09-28 10:36 EST ------- This package has been imported and build, so I see no reason for leaving this ticker open, closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 28 14:36:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 10:36:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208422] New: Review Request: wmctrl - A command line tool to interact with an EWMH/NetWM compatible X Window Manager. Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208422 Summary: Review Request: wmctrl - A command line tool to interact with an EWMH/NetWM compatible X Window Manager. Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: miker5slow at grandecom.net QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://errr.fluxbox-wiki.org/fedora_stuff/wmctrl.spec SRPM URL: http://errr.fluxbox-wiki.org/fedora_stuff/wmctrl-1.07-1.fc5.src.rpm Description: The wmctrl program is a UNIX/Linux command line tool to interact with an EWMH/NetWM compatible X Window Manager. The tool provides command line access to almost all the features defined in the EWMH specification. It can be used, for example, to obtain information about the window manager, to get a detailed list of desktops and managed windows, to switch and resize desktops, to make windows full-screen, always-above or sticky, and to activate, close, move, resize, maximize and minimize them. The command line access to these window management functions makes it easy to automate and execute them from any application that is able to run a command in response to an event -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 28 14:37:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 10:37:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 175047] Review Request: NetworkManager-openvpn In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609281437.k8SEblRA013366@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: NetworkManager-openvpn https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175047 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-09-28 10:37 EST ------- This package has been imported and build, so I see no reason for leaving this ticket open, closing. I know there are still SELinux issues but those _really_ belong in a seperate bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 28 14:39:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 10:39:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199919] Review Request: Asuka In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609281439.k8SEdOBh013631@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Asuka https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199919 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-09-28 10:39 EST ------- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 28 14:40:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 10:40:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191005] Review Request: glob2 - Realtime Strategy game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609281440.k8SEemB6013737@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glob2 - Realtime Strategy game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191005 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-09-28 10:40 EST ------- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 28 14:40:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 10:40:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201418] Review Request: widelands - GPL Settlers II clone In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609281440.k8SEerqY013755@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: widelands - GPL Settlers II clone https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201418 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-09-28 10:40 EST ------- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 28 14:41:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 10:41:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208424] New: Review Request: scrot - Screen-shot capture using Imlib2 Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208424 Summary: Review Request: scrot - Screen-shot capture using Imlib2 Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: miker5slow at grandecom.net QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://errr.fluxbox-wiki.org/fedora_stuff/scrot.spec SRPM URL: http://errr.fluxbox-wiki.org/fedora_stuff/scrot-0.8-1.fc5.src.rpm Description: A nice and straightforward screen capture utility implementing the dynamic loaders of imlib2. Very popular among *box users from it being very light weight. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 28 14:43:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 10:43:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204259] Review Request: geda - Project manager for gEDA In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609281443.k8SEhPCj013964@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: geda - Project manager for gEDA https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204259 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778, 204624 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 28 14:57:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 10:57:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208422] Review Request: wmctrl - A command line tool to interact with an EWMH/NetWM compatible X Window Manager. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609281457.k8SEv3i3015329@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wmctrl - A command line tool to interact with an EWMH/NetWM compatible X Window Manager. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208422 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-09-28 10:57 EST ------- Is it your first package? In that case you should block the FE-NEEDSPONSOR bug. Some quick comments: You should wrap your lines at 80 columns for %description The summary is too long and should not end with a dot. Since I think that most if not all the window managers in fedora are EWMH/NetWM compatible (except maybe mwm and twm...) I think it is not very usefull to specify that in the summary. -n %{name}-%{version} is not usefull on the %setup line since it is the default. Application/Control don't seem to exist. The groups are at: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/RPMGroups I think that Group: User Interface/X could be right. libXmu-devel allready requires libX11-devel -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 28 15:00:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 11:00:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207853] Review Request: tclabc - A Tcl interface and a Tk GUI to the ABC notation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609281500.k8SF0dPG015558@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tclabc - A Tcl interface and a Tk GUI to the ABC notation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207853 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-09-28 11:00 EST ------- Well, Reviewing this. 1. From http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines : * Requires and BuildRequires - The following Requires/BuildRequires are not needed. * BuildRequires: tcl <- required by tk * BuildRequires: tk <- required by tk-devel * BuildRequires: tcl-devel <- required by tk-devel * Requires: tcl <- required by tk - The results of rebuilding this between by normal rpmbuild and by mockbuild differ * The comparison of what tclabc-1.0.7-1.fc6 requires between the one rebuild by rpmbuild and by mockbuild: --- 2.txt 2006-09-28 23:34:40.000000000 +0900 +++ 1.txt 2006-09-28 23:34:15.000000000 +0900 @@ -1,7 +1,5 @@ /bin/sh abcm2ps -libasound.so.2 -libasound.so.2(ALSA_0.9) libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.3) Build log also differ: ............. @@ -65,7 +341,7 @@ checking for dlopen in -ldl... yes checking for sound card... yes checking for SB AWE 32... yes -checking for the ALSA library... yes +checking for the ALSA library... no updating cache ./config.cache creating ./config.status creating Makefile ............. @@ -147,67 +424,69 @@ midi.c:2720: warning: ignoring return value of 'write', declared with attribute warn_unused_result gcc -shared tclabc.o abcparse.o change.o midi.o \ -o tclabc.so \ - -lasound + + exit 0 Check the BuildRequires dependency for alsa library. * Encoding - Some text files are encoded in ISO-8859-1 /usr/lib/tclabc/change.tcl /usr/lib/tclabc/detail.tcl /usr/lib/tclabc/help.tcl /usr/lib/tclabc/lang-de.tcl /usr/lib/tclabc/lang-fr.tcl /usr/lib/tclabc/lang-nl.tcl /usr/lib/tclabc/lang-ptBR.tcl /usr/lib/tclabc/lang-se.tcl /usr/lib/tclabc/play.tcl /usr/lib/tclabc/pref.tcl /usr/lib/tclabc/select.tcl /usr/lib/tclabc/tkabc.tcl /usr/lib/tclabc/tkorgan.tcl /usr/share/doc/tclabc-1.0.7/README * At least the encoding of /usr/share/doc/tclabc-1.0.7/README should be changed to UTF-8. * Also check if other tcl files can also have their encodings changed to UTF-8. * Timestamps - This package includes some html files in source files, so keeping timestamps for these html files are recommended. Use: make install prefix=....... INSTALL_DATA="install -c -p" to keep timestamps. 2. From http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines : * The sources used to build the package... Use: http://moinejf.free.fr/tclabc-%{version}.tar.gz for Source0 3. Other things I have noticed. * Well, I don't understand how to use this, however, when I try "tkabc bachto.mid" (bachto.mid is MIDI file), I get: [tasaka1 at localhost TEMP]$ tkabc bachto.mid no output MIDI synth open: No such file or directory cannot open MIDI in '/dev/midi00' .. is this okay? It seems I cannot hear any sound. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 28 15:34:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 11:34:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201006] Review Request: HelixPlayer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609281534.k8SFYqSi017989@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: HelixPlayer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201006 ------- Additional Comments From gauret at free.fr 2006-09-28 11:34 EST ------- OK, but for now I'd really like someone to review my spec file, in order to fix the dependency problem of Amarok in FE6 I'll maintain HelixPlayer as long as you haven't enough time for it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 28 15:41:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 11:41:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208436] New: Review Request: kphotobymail - Kphotobymail is a PyQT based application for uploading photos to flickr account. Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208436 Summary: Review Request: kphotobymail - Kphotobymail is a PyQT based application for uploading photos to flickr account. Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kushaldas at gmail.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://freeshell.in/~kushal/kphotobymail.spec SRPM URL: http://freeshell.in/~kushal/kphotobymail-0.3.2-1.src.rpm Description: Kphotobymail is a PyQT based application for uploading photos to flickr account. You can also use it to send emails with photo attachment on the fly. This is my first package, so requesting a review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 28 15:42:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 11:42:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201006] Review Request: HelixPlayer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609281542.k8SFgbht018803@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: HelixPlayer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201006 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|gauret at free.fr |rdieter at math.unl.edu CC| |gauret at free.fr ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-09-28 11:42 EST ------- Aurelien, I'll consider you the submittor, and I'll take over reviewing this, if that's ok with you. (: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 28 15:48:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 11:48:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201006] Review Request: HelixPlayer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609281548.k8SFmt2j019405@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: HelixPlayer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201006 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-09-28 11:48 EST ------- A couple oddities stick out to me initially: 1. Requires: libbluecurve.so%{libdepssuffix} Any idea on the rationale for this? Kinda like the imo crazy dep on libbluecurve in openoffice.org? Can this be dropped? Maybe I'll just try it and see. 2. Requires: %{_libdir}/mozilla/plugins I'm torn here, is HelixPlayer *really* dependant on a webbrowser, or is this just for directory ownership? If the latter, imo, this might be better off split into a HelixPlayer-plugin subpkg. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 28 15:51:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 11:51:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207853] Review Request: tclabc - A Tcl interface and a Tk GUI to the ABC notation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609281551.k8SFpMWV019683@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tclabc - A Tcl interface and a Tk GUI to the ABC notation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207853 ------- Additional Comments From gemi at bluewin.ch 2006-09-28 11:51 EST ------- (In reply to comment #9) > Well, Reviewing this. > > 1. From http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines : > > * Requires and BuildRequires > - The following Requires/BuildRequires are not needed. > * BuildRequires: tcl <- required by tk > * BuildRequires: tk <- required by tk-devel > * BuildRequires: tcl-devel <- required by tk-devel > * Requires: tcl <- required by tk Ok. > Check the BuildRequires dependency for alsa library. Ok. > * At least the encoding of /usr/share/doc/tclabc-1.0.7/README > should be changed to UTF-8. > * Also check if other tcl files can also have their encodings changed > to UTF-8. Ok. > * Timestamps > - This package includes some html files in source files, so keeping > timestamps for these html files are recommended. This I don't understand. Why is it necessary? > 2. From http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines : > > * The sources used to build the package... > Use: http://moinejf.free.fr/tclabc-%{version}.tar.gz > for Source0 I see nothing in the guidelines about this, but ok. > 3. Other things I have noticed. > * Well, I don't understand how to use this, however, when I try > "tkabc bachto.mid" (bachto.mid is MIDI file), I get: > > [tasaka1 at localhost TEMP]$ tkabc bachto.mid > no output MIDI synth > open: No such file or directory > cannot open MIDI in '/dev/midi00' The MIDI devices have to be configured in the preferences dialog. When alsa is used, something like "17:0" has to be used for an alsa midi devices. However this depends on the soundcard. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 28 15:54:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 11:54:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205620] Fedora Extras: Package Review Request: buildos In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609281554.k8SFskst020123@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Fedora Extras: Package Review Request: buildos https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205620 prarit at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #135995|0 |1 is obsolete| | ------- Additional Comments From prarit at redhat.com 2006-09-28 11:54 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=137319) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=137319&action=view) source RPM -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 28 16:03:26 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 12:03:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208254] Review Request: pikloops - Code generator for PIC delays In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609281603.k8SG3QUx020954@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pikloops - Code generator for PIC delays https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208254 ------- Additional Comments From aportal at univ-montp2.fr 2006-09-28 12:03 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > 1.) Don't script the executables. Sorry, I don't understand. > Please use the gcc -g compiler flag. Just after %configure, I made: %{__sed} -i -e 's/CC = gcc/CC = gcc -g/' Makefile %{__sed} -i -e 's/CPP = gcc -E/CPP = gcc -E -g/' Makefile %{__sed} -i -e 's/CXX = g++/CXX = g++ -g/' Makefile %{__sed} -i -e 's/CXXCPP = g++ -E/CXXCPP = g++ -E -g/' Makefile %{__sed} -i -e 's/CC = gcc/CC = gcc -g/' %{name}/Makefile %{__sed} -i -e 's/CPP = gcc -E/CPP = gcc -E -g/' %{name}/Makefile %{__sed} -i -e 's/CXX = g++/CXX = g++ -g/' %{name}/Makefile %{__sed} -i -e 's/CXXCPP = g++ -E/CXXCPP = g++ -E -g/' %{name}/Makefile debug-info rpm still empty > 2.) To be sure to compile with the right QT version. It seems to me there is only one QT version on each FC?, the last updated. The only problem I encountred was to buils under FC4 on arch x86_64. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=169132 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 28 16:05:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 12:05:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193784] Review Request: linuxdcpp - A port of DC++ to Linux In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609281605.k8SG5TON021099@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: linuxdcpp - A port of DC++ to Linux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193784 andy at smile.org.ua changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX ------- Additional Comments From andy at smile.org.ua 2006-09-28 12:05 EST ------- Due to multiple memory leaks in the mainstream and no release I won't continue update it and push to FE. This package is buggy for now. Sorry. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 28 16:09:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 12:09:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208254] Review Request: pikloops - Code generator for PIC delays In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609281609.k8SG9Tg7021368@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pikloops - Code generator for PIC delays https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208254 ------- Additional Comments From aportal at univ-montp2.fr 2006-09-28 12:09 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > Bad: > - Debuginfo package is empty. I found. That was because of make install-strip -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 28 16:10:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 12:10:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208254] Review Request: pikloops - Code generator for PIC delays In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609281610.k8SGAEI1021461@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pikloops - Code generator for PIC delays https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208254 ------- Additional Comments From aportal at univ-montp2.fr 2006-09-28 12:10 EST ------- Spec URL: http://linuxelectronique.free.fr/download/fedora/5/SPECS/pikloops.spec SRPM URL: http://linuxelectronique.free.fr/download/fedora/5/SRPMS/pikloops-0.2.1-2.src.rpm %changelog * Thu Sep 28 2006 Alain Portal 0.2.1-2 - Don't make install-strip -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 28 16:16:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 12:16:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199108] Review Request: gutenprint: Printer Drivers Package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609281616.k8SGG02m021892@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gutenprint: Printer Drivers Package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199108 ------- Additional Comments From luya_tfz at thefinalzone.com 2006-09-28 12:15 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=137323) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=137323&action=view) build result Attempting to build x86_64 package. It looks like errors occured because program link to lib instead of lib64. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 28 16:28:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 12:28:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193867] Review Request: klamav - Clam Anti-Virus on the KDE Desktop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609281628.k8SGSZ6B023025@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: klamav - Clam Anti-Virus on the KDE Desktop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193867 andy at smile.org.ua changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From andy at smile.org.ua 2006-09-28 12:28 EST ------- Yes, you are right. Thank you for review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 28 16:43:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 12:43:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207853] Review Request: tclabc - A Tcl interface and a Tk GUI to the ABC notation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609281643.k8SGhoVu024156@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tclabc - A Tcl interface and a Tk GUI to the ABC notation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207853 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-09-28 12:43 EST ------- (In reply to comment #10) > > * Timestamps > > - This package includes some html files in source files, so keeping > > timestamps for these html files are recommended. > This I don't understand. Why is it necessary? Keeping timestamps is preferable because it make it clearer * if a packager like you added some modification for the original sources or text files * when these text files or source files are originally written So this is preferable especially when the package created contains large number of documentations (e.g. kernel-doc). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 28 16:46:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 12:46:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201006] Review Request: HelixPlayer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609281646.k8SGkDCC024399@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: HelixPlayer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201006 ------- Additional Comments From gauret at free.fr 2006-09-28 12:46 EST ------- Thanks for reviewing Rex ! 1. : no idea, it was there in the core package, so I didn't change it. It looks like it's 64bits-specific. If you have access to such a machine, could you test ? 2. : right, I splitted off the plugin : http://gauret.free.fr/fichiers/rpms/fedora/HelixPlayer-1.0.7-3.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 28 16:46:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 12:46:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207676] Review Request: SDL_pango - Rendering of internationalized text for SDL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609281646.k8SGkUXp024434@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: SDL_pango - Rendering of internationalized text for SDL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207676 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-09-28 12:46 EST ------- I downloaded SDL_Pango-0.1.2-3 from http://buildsys.fedoraproject.org/plague-results/fedora-development-extras/ and it seems well. Now I close this bug as CLOSED NEXTRELEASE. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 28 16:49:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 12:49:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192436] Review Request: xorg-x11-server-Xgl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609281649.k8SGnbWq024586@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xorg-x11-server-Xgl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192436 gauret at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |gauret at free.fr ------- Additional Comments From gauret at free.fr 2006-09-28 12:49 EST ------- The build fails with : hw/dmx/doc/Makefile.am:24: BUILD_LINUXDOC does not appear in AM_CONDITIONAL hw/dmx/doc/Makefile.am:27: BUILD_PDFDOC does not appear in AM_CONDITIONAL hw/xfree86/doc/sgml/Makefile.am:24: BUILD_LINUXDOC does not appear in AM_CONDITIONAL hw/xfree86/doc/sgml/Makefile.am:27: BUILD_PDFDOC does not appear in AM_CONDITIONAL autoreconf: automake failed with exit status: 1 in %prep. The net says there should be additional Xorg macros installed (eg : http://www.fedoraforum.org/forum/showthread.php?t=104404&page=3 ) Any idea in which package those could be ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 28 17:07:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 13:07:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208420] Review Request: conky - A system monitor for X originally based on the torsmo code In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609281707.k8SH7dIL026194@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: conky - A system monitor for X originally based on the torsmo code https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208420 miker5slow at grandecom.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|devel |fc5 OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |177841 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From miker5slow at grandecom.net 2006-09-28 13:07 EST ------- This is my first package, and I am seeking a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 28 17:16:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 13:16:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208254] Review Request: pikloops - Code generator for PIC delays In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609281716.k8SHGEPx026658@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pikloops - Code generator for PIC delays https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208254 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-09-28 13:16 EST ------- Usually the files under /etc/profile.d is correctly "source"d (you can check this by trying to add "set" in the first line of %build). So "source"ing /etc/profile.d/qt.sh is not necessary. This can be checked by a example of kbackup: http://buildsys.fedoraproject.org/logs/fedora-development-extras/18479-kbackup-0.5-6.fc6/x86_64/build.log (this is reviewed by me). By the way, you should add %?dist tag. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 28 17:20:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 13:20:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208422] Review Request: wmctrl - A command line tool to interact with an EWMH/NetWM compatible X Window Manager. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609281720.k8SHKPK4026810@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wmctrl - A command line tool to interact with an EWMH/NetWM compatible X Window Manager. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208422 miker5slow at grandecom.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |177841 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From miker5slow at grandecom.net 2006-09-28 13:20 EST ------- This is my second package, and I am seeking a sponsor -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 28 17:30:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 13:30:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208254] Review Request: pikloops - Code generator for PIC delays In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609281730.k8SHUlwk027425@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pikloops - Code generator for PIC delays https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208254 ------- Additional Comments From aportal at univ-montp2.fr 2006-09-28 13:30 EST ------- (In reply to comment #7) > > By the way, you should add %?dist tag. > Oups... SRPM URL: http://linuxelectronique.free.fr/download/fedora/5/SRPMS/pikloops-0.2.1-3.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 28 17:32:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 13:32:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208424] Review Request: scrot - Screen-shot capture using Imlib2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609281732.k8SHWem2027534@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scrot - Screen-shot capture using Imlib2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208424 miker5slow at grandecom.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |177841 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From miker5slow at grandecom.net 2006-09-28 13:32 EST ------- This is my third package, and I am seeking a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 28 17:34:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 13:34:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177512] Review Request: mysql-connector-net In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609281734.k8SHY4W0027714@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mysql-connector-net https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177512 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-09-28 13:34 EST ------- ok, all the blockers I was seeing appear to be addressed, so this package is APPROVED. Don't forget to close this bug with NEXTRELEASE once it's been imported and built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 28 17:40:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 13:40:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207853] Review Request: tclabc - A Tcl interface and a Tk GUI to the ABC notation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609281740.k8SHenWq028364@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tclabc - A Tcl interface and a Tk GUI to the ABC notation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207853 ------- Additional Comments From gemi at bluewin.ch 2006-09-28 13:40 EST ------- Here is the update with fixes: http://math.ifi.unizh.ch/fedora/5/i386/SRPMS.gemi/tclabc-1.0.7-3.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 28 17:41:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 13:41:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208453] New: Review Request: php-pear-Console-Getargs - Command-line arguments and parameters parser Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208453 Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Console-Getargs - Command-line arguments and parameters parser Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: Fedora at FamilleCollet.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://remi.collet.free.fr/rpms/extras/php-pear-Console-Getargs.spec SRPM URL: http://remi.collet.free.fr/rpms/extras/php-pear-Console-Getargs-1.3.1-1.fc5.src.rpm Description: The Console_Getargs package implements a Command Line arguments and parameters parser for your CLI applications. It performs some basic arguments validation and automatically creates a formatted help text, based on the given configuration. This is a new Requires for php-pear-PHP-CompatInfo (version 1.4.0) now used instead of Console_Getopt. Build in mock : http://remi.collet.free.fr/rpms/extras/php-pear-Console-Getargs-build.log rpmlint not complains. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 28 17:55:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 13:55:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208422] Review Request: wmctrl - A command line tool to interact with an EWMH/NetWM compatible X Window Manager. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609281755.k8SHtI7J029235@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wmctrl - A command line tool to interact with an EWMH/NetWM compatible X Window Manager. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208422 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |163776 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-09-28 13:55 EST ------- Your bug should also block FE-NEW... I readd it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 28 17:55:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 13:55:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177583] Review Request: zaptel-kmod In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609281755.k8SHtPUO029271@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: zaptel-kmod https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177583 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-09-28 13:55 EST ------- Agreed with comment #52, and also seems to be the thoughts of (at least) serveral FESCo members... Kevin: Can you address the "non-interest in pushing the Zaptel drivers upstream into the mainline kernel." with any more detail? There are many good advantages to getting things merged upstream. Even if you have to still expend energy maintaining a 2.4 branch, having all the eyes reviewing/fixing your 2.6 code could still be a good win, IMHO... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 28 17:57:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 13:57:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208250] Review Request: piklab - Development environment for applications based on PIC and dsPIC microcontrollers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609281757.k8SHvnvj029460@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: piklab - Development environment for applications based on PIC and dsPIC microcontrollers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208250 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-09-28 13:57 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=137327) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=137327&action=view) mockbuild log of piklab-0.11.3-2 Alain, can you rebuild piklab-0.11.3-2 correctly? I tried under FC6-devel i386 mock, but it failed. Would you check my build log? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 28 18:02:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 14:02:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208422] Review Request: wmctrl - A command line tool to interact with an EWMH/NetWM compatible X Window Manager. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609281802.k8SI2Clf029863@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wmctrl - A command line tool to interact with an EWMH/NetWM compatible X Window Manager. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208422 ------- Additional Comments From miker5slow at grandecom.net 2006-09-28 14:02 EST ------- Patrice, thanks for looking this over, pardon me if I get some things wrong with this bugzilla, I have never used this before. FE-NEW Im not sure what you mean by this.. I redid the spec file and built a new srpm it is here: http://errr.fluxbox-wiki.org/fedora_stuff/wmctrl-1.07-2.fc5.src.rpm And the spec is here: http://errr.fluxbox-wiki.org/fedora_stuff/wmctrl-1.07-2.fc5/wmctrl.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 28 18:11:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 14:11:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177583] Review Request: zaptel-kmod In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609281811.k8SIBZna030545@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: zaptel-kmod https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177583 ------- Additional Comments From kpfleming at digium.com 2006-09-28 14:11 EST ------- I really don't know what else can be said. In spite of comments like 'dual licensing is acceptable', I don't think the other commenters are willing to see our position at all. I know that you don't have a problem with including a dual-licensed component into your distribution, and I also know that Linus et. al. don't have a problem including dual-licensed code into the kernel tree. Those are not our concern. What is our concern is that if Zaptel is merged into the main kernel tree, from that point forward anyone who wants to improve it can do so without contributing their changes to our version of Zaptel, which devalues our dual licensing of Zaptel completely. Obviously, it is not in our best interests to do that. Today, of course, people can easily produce their own distributions of Zaptel with non-contributed changes (and those distributions exist), but since they are not considered 'official' they are not the distributions that mainstream users will want to use. If Zaptel is in the Linus kernel tree, that becomes the defacto 'official' distribution, and there would be no incentive at all for anyone to contribute their changes to us for use in our commercially-licensed products. I fully understand that the many members of the open source community do not really care whether Digium continues to benefit from dual-licensing Zaptel or not, and they are welcome to that opinion. In fact, if people want to take our GPL distribution of Zaptel and submit it for inclusion into the kernel tree (and continue maintenance of it from that point forward) then obviously they can do that (barring any potential trademark infringement issues, which I am not in a position to comment on). I just don't see that Digium will ever decide that the best place for Zaptel to live is in the kernel tree, and the primary driver of that decision is our choice to keep it dual-licensed and desire for changes to be contributed back to us. The additional benefits of having many more developers reviewing/fixing thec code would most certainly be welcome, but they don't currently outweigh the value of maintaining the ability to commercially license the relevant parts of the code base. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 28 18:12:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 14:12:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207853] Review Request: tclabc - A Tcl interface and a Tk GUI to the ABC notation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609281812.k8SICGV1030633@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tclabc - A Tcl interface and a Tk GUI to the ABC notation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207853 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-09-28 14:12 EST ------- Well, sometimes iconv fails so I usually use: iconv -f iso-8859-1 -t utf-8 $f -o $f.iconv && mv $f.iconv $f Perhaps this is preferable (this is not a blocker). Other things are okay. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- This package (tclabc) is APPROVED by me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 28 18:14:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 14:14:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201006] Review Request: HelixPlayer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609281814.k8SIEFiB030785@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: HelixPlayer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201006 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-09-28 14:14 EST ------- > It looks like it's 64bits-specific. If you have access to such a machine, > could you test ? maybe not, see: ExcludeArch: ppc64 x86_64 s390 s390x ia64 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 28 18:15:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 14:15:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201006] Review Request: HelixPlayer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609281815.k8SIF3T2030860@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: HelixPlayer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201006 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-09-28 14:15 EST ------- ok, reference bug #135709 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 28 18:17:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 14:17:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201006] Review Request: HelixPlayer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609281817.k8SIHEqr031081@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: HelixPlayer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201006 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-09-28 14:17 EST ------- I don't think I agree with the hack, I say omit it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 28 18:20:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 14:20:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208250] Review Request: piklab - Development environment for applications based on PIC and dsPIC microcontrollers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609281820.k8SIKNqx031238@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: piklab - Development environment for applications based on PIC and dsPIC microcontrollers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208250 ------- Additional Comments From alain.portal at free.fr 2006-09-28 14:20 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > Created an attachment (id=137327) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=137327&action=view) [edit] > mockbuild log of piklab-0.11.3-2 > > Alain, can you rebuild piklab-0.11.3-2 correctly? I'll do that tomorrow at work, my home computer isn't powerfull > I tried under FC6-devel i386 mock, but it failed. Strange, build fine on an uptodate FC5 > Would you check my build log? Yes, please. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 28 18:37:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 14:37:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208250] Review Request: piklab - Development environment for applications based on PIC and dsPIC microcontrollers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609281837.k8SIbneA032417@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: piklab - Development environment for applications based on PIC and dsPIC microcontrollers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208250 ------- Additional Comments From Jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2006-09-28 14:37 EST ------- Bad: - Don't sourced QT environment variables. (this should make sure, that the build runs agains the right Qt version) - Rpmlint complaints on binary rpm: E: piklab summary-too-long Development environment for applications based on PIC and dsPIC microcontrollers W: piklab dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/piklab/common ../doc/common /tmp/piklab-0.11.3-2.i686.rpm.5998/usr/share/applications/kde/piklab.desktop: warning: file contains key "DocPath", this key is currently reserved for use within KDE, and should in the future KDE releases be prefixed by "X-" BTW: I use rpmlint-0.78-1 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 28 18:38:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 14:38:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201006] Review Request: HelixPlayer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609281838.k8SIc6TU032459@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: HelixPlayer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201006 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-09-28 14:37 EST ------- Suggestions: 1. Make buildable everywhere -BuildRequires: libogg-devel, libXt-devel, libXv-devel +BuildRequires: libogg-devel BuildRequires: desktop-file-utils +%if "%{?fedora}" > "4" || "%{?rhel}" > "4" +BuildRequires: libXt-devel libXv-devel +%else +BuildRequires: xorg-x11-devel +%endif 2. Drop Requires: libbluecurve hack 3. -plugin should Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} 4. drop deprecated use-of/references-to %_datadir/pixmaps 5. in %install, recommend using the 'install -p' command in place of 'cp', be careful in most places to use -m644, but for bins/libs use -m755 Address these, and I'll approve this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 28 18:40:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 14:40:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208007] Review Request: perl-Alien-wxWidgets - Building, finding and using wxWidgets binaries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609281840.k8SIeTEb000340@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Alien-wxWidgets - Building, finding and using wxWidgets binaries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208007 jpo at di.uminho.pt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From jpo at di.uminho.pt 2006-09-28 14:40 EST ------- New release build for FC-5 and devel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 28 18:40:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 14:40:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208009] Review Request: perl-Wx - Interface to the wxWidgets cross-platform GUI toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609281840.k8SIeh3K000398@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Wx - Interface to the wxWidgets cross-platform GUI toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208009 Bug 208009 depends on bug 208007, which changed state. Bug 208007 Summary: Review Request: perl-Alien-wxWidgets - Building, finding and using wxWidgets binaries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208007 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 28 18:44:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 14:44:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208420] Review Request: conky - A system monitor for X originally based on the torsmo code In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609281844.k8SIibHh000688@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: conky - A system monitor for X originally based on the torsmo code https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208420 ------- Additional Comments From miker5slow at grandecom.net 2006-09-28 14:44 EST ------- I wanted to make a note that in the spec file I claim the license of this app is gpl/bsd/mit but thats because the code I found in its src has all of them. I wasnt sure which of the 3 to use. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 28 18:44:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 14:44:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208009] Review Request: perl-Wx - Interface to the wxWidgets cross-platform GUI toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609281844.k8SIinME000705@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Wx - Interface to the wxWidgets cross-platform GUI toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208009 ------- Additional Comments From jpo at di.uminho.pt 2006-09-28 14:44 EST ------- Jason, Could you try to rebuild perl-Wx? The problem was in perl-Alien-wxWidgets (see bug #208007 comment #2). Tia, jpo -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 28 19:00:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 15:00:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208250] Review Request: piklab - Development environment for applications based on PIC and dsPIC microcontrollers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609281900.k8SJ0uQS001790@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: piklab - Development environment for applications based on PIC and dsPIC microcontrollers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208250 ------- Additional Comments From alain.portal at free.fr 2006-09-28 15:00 EST ------- (In reply to comment #6) > Bad: > > - Don't sourced QT environment variables. > (this should make sure, that the build runs agains the right Qt version) This isn't needed. > - Rpmlint complaints on binary rpm: > E: piklab summary-too-long Development environment for applications based on PIC > and dsPIC microcontrollers I don't have this error! Mamoru, please, could you confirm? > W: piklab dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/piklab/common > ../doc/common > /tmp/piklab-0.11.3-2.i686.rpm.5998/usr/share/applications/kde/piklab.desktop: > warning: file contains key "DocPath", this key is currently reserved for use > within KDE, and should in the future KDE releases be prefixed by "X-" Why do you want I make a better package than you? rpmlint kyum-0.7.5-4.fc6.i386.rpm W: kyum dangling-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/kyum/common /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/common W: kyum symlink-should-be-relative /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/kyum/common /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/common E: kyum non-executable-script /usr/share/apps/kyum/kyum_sysinfo.py 0644 E: kyum zero-length /usr/share/doc/kyum-0.7.5/README /tmp/kyum-0.7.5-4.fc6.i386.rpm.3618/usr/share/applications/kde/fedora-kyum.desktop: warning: file contains key "DocPath", this key is currently reserved for use within KDE, and should in the future KDE releases be prefixed by "X-" -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 28 19:04:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 15:04:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208436] Review Request: kphotobymail - Kphotobymail is a PyQT based application for uploading photos to flickr account. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609281904.k8SJ44mA001991@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kphotobymail - Kphotobymail is a PyQT based application for uploading photos to flickr account. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208436 cgoorah at yahoo.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |cgoorah at yahoo.com.au OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 28 19:10:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 15:10:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208436] Review Request: kphotobymail - Kphotobymail is a PyQT based application for uploading photos to flickr account. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609281910.k8SJAOvH002430@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kphotobymail - Kphotobymail is a PyQT based application for uploading photos to flickr account. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208436 cgoorah at yahoo.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |177841 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 28 19:11:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 15:11:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208250] Review Request: piklab - Development environment for applications based on PIC and dsPIC microcontrollers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609281911.k8SJBe9t002579@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: piklab - Development environment for applications based on PIC and dsPIC microcontrollers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208250 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-09-28 15:11 EST ------- (In reply to comment #7) > (In reply to comment #6) > > Bad: > > > > - Don't sourced QT environment variables. > > (this should make sure, that the build runs agains the right Qt version) > > This isn't needed. I also think this is not needed because the files under /etc/profile.d is "source"d even without explicitly sourced. Actually many packages using Qt don't source Qt environ explicitly, this can be seen under: http://buildsys.fedoraproject.org/logs/fedora-development-extras/ > > - Rpmlint complaints on binary rpm: > > E: piklab summary-too-long Development environment for applications based on > PIC > > and dsPIC microcontrollers > > I don't have this error! > Mamoru, please, could you confirm? I HAVE. "rpmlint -I summary-too-long" says summary must be less than 80 characters (not longer than 79), however, this summary seems to have just 80 characters...... > > > W: piklab dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/piklab/common > > ../doc/common This warning is not a problem because kdelibs is installed together and it corrects this. > > /tmp/piklab-0.11.3-2.i686.rpm.5998/usr/share/applications/kde/piklab.desktop: > > warning: file contains key "DocPath", this key is currently reserved for use > > within KDE, and should in the future KDE releases be prefixed by "X-" > > Why do you want I make a better package than you? I think this can be ignored. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 28 19:11:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 15:11:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208436] Review Request: kphotobymail - Kphotobymail is a PyQT based application for uploading photos to flickr account. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609281911.k8SJBe0w002583@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kphotobymail - Kphotobymail is a PyQT based application for uploading photos to flickr account. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208436 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2006-09-28 15:11 EST ------- First reviews for new packagers must be done by registered sponsors. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 28 19:15:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 15:15:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208250] Review Request: piklab - Development environment for applications based on PIC and dsPIC microcontrollers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609281915.k8SJFVva003078@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: piklab - Development environment for applications based on PIC and dsPIC microcontrollers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208250 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-09-28 15:14 EST ------- And.... (In reply to comment #5) > (In reply to comment #4) > > Created an attachment (id=137327) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=137327&action=view) [edit] [edit] > > mockbuild log of piklab-0.11.3-2 > > > > Alain, can you rebuild piklab-0.11.3-2 correctly? > > I'll do that tomorrow at work, my home computer isn't powerfull > > > I tried under FC6-devel i386 mock, but it failed. > > Strange, build fine on an uptodate FC5 I checked under FC5 i386_smp mockbuild and it surely succeeded, strange. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 28 19:37:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 15:37:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208420] Review Request: conky - A system monitor for X originally based on the torsmo code In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609281937.k8SJbqDg005361@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: conky - A system monitor for X originally based on the torsmo code https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208420 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pertusus at free.fr ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-09-28 15:37 EST ------- If a package is covered by the gpl and another licence, then the whole must be under the GPL. So the licence for the package is GPL, unless you have split it such that all the files of a subpackage have the other licence. Quoting the GPL: b) You must cause any work that you distribute or publish, that in whole or in part contains or is derived from the Program or any part thereof, to be licensed as a whole at no charge to all third parties under the terms of this License. You should readd FE-NEW. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 28 19:40:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 15:40:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208422] Review Request: wmctrl - A command line tool to interact with an EWMH/NetWM compatible X Window Manager. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609281940.k8SJeOLY005673@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wmctrl - A command line tool to interact with an EWMH/NetWM compatible X Window Manager. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208422 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-09-28 15:40 EST ------- I didn't asked to have a shorter description but a shorter summary... For the %description I just asked to have it wrapped at 80 columns. You have to keep the dot at the end of the description. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 28 19:43:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 15:43:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208420] Review Request: conky - A system monitor for X originally based on the torsmo code In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609281943.k8SJhPpb005878@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: conky - A system monitor for X originally based on the torsmo code https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208420 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-09-28 15:43 EST ------- You should use %configure. The glibc related buildrequires are unneeded as said here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-4cadce5e79d38a63cad3941de1dadc9d25d67d30 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 28 19:44:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 15:44:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208436] Review Request: kphotobymail - Kphotobymail is a PyQT based application for uploading photos to flickr account. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609281944.k8SJiDup006028@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kphotobymail - Kphotobymail is a PyQT based application for uploading photos to flickr account. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208436 cgoorah at yahoo.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|cgoorah at yahoo.com.au |nobody at fedoraproject.org OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163776 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2006-09-28 15:44 EST ------- I'll review it and get it ready for official review. But someone else will approved it. I can't be assigned to this bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 28 20:05:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 16:05:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199405] Review Request: vtk - The Visualization Toolkit - A high level 3D visualization library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609282005.k8SK5MuG007488@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vtk - The Visualization Toolkit - A high level 3D visualization library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199405 ------- Additional Comments From qspencer at ieee.org 2006-09-28 16:05 EST ------- OK, it looks like you were right about the strings. However, there is still a bug that was inserting the package build path when trying to build another project that uses VTK. Apparently this is a known bug: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=388736 Regarding the patent issues, I haven't fully researched the issue, but I was recently referred to these links by someone who uses VTK: http://public.kitware.com/pipermail/vtk-developers/2005-February/003131.html http://public.kitware.com/pipermail/vtk-developers/2002-July/001757.html It sounds to me like the patented subdirectory was removed from the source tree with release 5.0 because of the problems it was causing. If you have trouble getting a response from the upstream developers, the package is in Debian, so you might consider contacting the Debian packager for more information. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 28 20:08:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 16:08:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208397] Review Request: foo2zjs - Printer Drivers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609282008.k8SK8M9d007654@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: foo2zjs - Printer Drivers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208397 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 28 20:09:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 16:09:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208436] Review Request: kphotobymail - Kphotobymail is a PyQT based application for uploading photos to flickr account. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609282009.k8SK9P0Y007728@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kphotobymail - Kphotobymail is a PyQT based application for uploading photos to flickr account. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208436 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn|177841 | OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 28 20:15:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 16:15:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207853] Review Request: tclabc - A Tcl interface and a Tk GUI to the ABC notation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609282015.k8SKFguO008039@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tclabc - A Tcl interface and a Tk GUI to the ABC notation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207853 gemi at bluewin.ch changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From gemi at bluewin.ch 2006-09-28 16:15 EST ------- (In reply to comment #13) > Well, sometimes iconv fails so I usually use: > > iconv -f iso-8859-1 -t utf-8 $f -o $f.iconv && mv $f.iconv $f > > Perhaps this is preferable (this is not a blocker). Ok. Package imported. Build on FC-5 and devel. added entries to owners.list, comps-fe5.xml.in and comps-fe6.xml.in. Thanks for the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 28 20:17:35 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 16:17:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208250] Review Request: piklab - Development environment for applications based on PIC and dsPIC microcontrollers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609282017.k8SKHZnJ008126@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: piklab - Development environment for applications based on PIC and dsPIC microcontrollers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208250 ------- Additional Comments From alain.portal at free.fr 2006-09-28 16:17 EST ------- In your attachement, I found: checking readline/readline.h usability... yes checking readline/readline.h presence... yes checking for readline/readline.h... yes checking for rl_initialize... configure: WARNING: libreadline not found Perhaps it is a problem between versions FC5 : readline-5.0 FC6 : readline-5.1 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 28 20:25:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 16:25:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199029] Review Request: jokosher In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609282025.k8SKPIMQ008556@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jokosher https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199029 ------- Additional Comments From snecklifter at gmail.com 2006-09-28 16:25 EST ------- (In reply to comment #33) > The SOURCE1 isn't a binary. It's a script. I can see why you're doing that but > it is kinda ugly. What's upstream's plans for future releases? Will they > include that kind of script? Or make it so Jokosher.py actually can be > installed to %{bindir}? Or....? Plans are to make Jokosher.py executable, if not for 0.2 then for 0.3. 0.2 is out end of November. > __init__.py might be better as: > touch %{buildroot}%{python-sitelib}/%{name}/__init__.py fixed. > but you have a comment in your changelog about security. Can you explain if > touch would be a problem? No problem at all, thank you for suggestion. > Putting the png images into %{python-sitelib} isn't a great idea. Is it hard to > put them into %{_datadir}/%{name} or something similar? The instrument files also sit in this directoy however this is changing in 0.2. Can this be accepted for 0.1 or am I better off waiting for 0.2? I am beginning to think the latter as there are a number of things that this process has highlighted that are resolved in 0.2 > If you use your jokosher script you probably don't want execute permissions on > Jokosher.py. fixed > I'm not sure about the wisdom of making WaveForm.py exectuable. It loks to me > as though directly executing WaveForm.py makes a test case run... so this isn't > something someone who installs jokosher is going to want to do. (Correct me if > I'm wrong on that.) Waveform.py is a test case although one class does import it, this has since been fixed. I have fixed this however. As it stands I do not have the know-how to patch the code to meet the requirements wrt the images and instrument files. Unless these can be overlooked along with the script executable I will delay this package until an admittedly more mature app arrives with 0.2. Input appreciated. I have not made a new release until above is clarified. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 28 20:31:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 16:31:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208250] Review Request: piklab - Development environment for applications based on PIC and dsPIC microcontrollers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609282031.k8SKVTbb008973@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: piklab - Development environment for applications based on PIC and dsPIC microcontrollers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208250 ------- Additional Comments From alain.portal at free.fr 2006-09-28 16:31 EST ------- Under FC5: checking readline/readline.h usability... yes checking readline/readline.h presence... yes checking for readline/readline.h... yes checking for rl_initialize... yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 28 20:51:10 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 16:51:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201000] Review Request: libFoundation - A free implementation of OpenStep's Foundation Kit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609282051.k8SKpAwi010691@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libFoundation - A free implementation of OpenStep's Foundation Kit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201000 ------- Additional Comments From Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net 2006-09-28 16:51 EST ------- I'm not sure what impact this would have on other dependent projects, and it's for fixing something that (currently) isn't broke. I also consulted the packaging commitee and most agree on that (but we were only 5 out of 10 present). I suggest the following: Let the package pass as is (at least wrt to headers, if the are other issues, they need to be fixed, of course), and I will take the header topic upstream. So should a clash with say glibc's assumed future extensions folder come up, the issue would have been ironed out at the source and not the package. Do you agree? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 28 20:53:13 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 16:53:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199029] Review Request: jokosher In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609282053.k8SKrDmq010880@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jokosher https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199029 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-09-28 16:53 EST ------- Personally, I'd hang fire to the 0.2 release as it sounds like it will fix a lot of problems you've encountered. It may be possible if upstream is using svn or cvs to use a snapshot for the review which would possibly have the faults highlighted here as being fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 28 21:21:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 17:21:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208420] Review Request: conky - A system monitor for X originally based on the torsmo code In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609282121.k8SLLYHc012916@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: conky - A system monitor for X originally based on the torsmo code https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208420 miker5slow at grandecom.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 |163776 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From miker5slow at grandecom.net 2006-09-28 17:21 EST ------- Patrice, thanks for looking this one over too. I got the above things fixed and the new spec is here: http://errr.fluxbox-wiki.org/fedora_stuff/conky/3/conky.spec and the srpm is here: http://errr.fluxbox-wiki.org/fedora_stuff/conky/3/conky-1.4.2-3.fc5.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 28 21:24:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 17:24:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208424] Review Request: scrot - Screen-shot capture using Imlib2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609282124.k8SLOpvh013226@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scrot - Screen-shot capture using Imlib2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208424 miker5slow at grandecom.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 |163776 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 28 21:47:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 17:47:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201006] Review Request: HelixPlayer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609282147.k8SLlosd016207@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: HelixPlayer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201006 ------- Additional Comments From gauret at free.fr 2006-09-28 17:47 EST ------- OK, fixed : http://gauret.free.fr/fichiers/rpms/fedora/HelixPlayer-1.0.7-4.src.rpm 1. : I've added ' || "%{?fedora}%{?rhel}" == "" ' to have rpm pick the Right Dep if neither %fedora not %rhel is defined (manual rebuild) 2. : agreed 3. : actually, it's Requires: %{name} = %{epoch}:%{version}-%{release} Took me 10 minutes to figure it out. I hate epochs. 4. and 5. : done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 28 22:00:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 18:00:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199405] Review Request: vtk - The Visualization Toolkit - A high level 3D visualization library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609282200.k8SM0khQ017448@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vtk - The Visualization Toolkit - A high level 3D visualization library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199405 ------- Additional Comments From mgarski at post.pl 2006-09-28 18:00 EST ------- (In reply to comment #10) > Those 3 are outdated. At least it should be reported and discussed > upstream: > * the netcdf part is based on an netcdf library older than what is > in extras > * the included DICOMParser library is older that the one on > http://sourceforge.net/projects/dicomparser/ > * the included FTGL is older then the one on > http://homepages.paradise.net.nz/henryj/code/ I have filed upstream bug report against this, see: http://www.vtk.org/Bug/bug.php?op=show&bugid=3824 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 28 22:10:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 18:10:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208420] Review Request: conky - A system monitor for X originally based on the torsmo code In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609282210.k8SMA4Uu017867@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: conky - A system monitor for X originally based on the torsmo code https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208420 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-09-28 18:10 EST ------- You also need to block FE-NEEDSPONSOR too ;-) Some comments: * your changelog entries are not very informative. You could have better said something along - use the GPL as licence since the whole package is GPL - use %%configure and so on. * NEWS is empty, no need to ship it * The part 'originally based on the torsmo code' in the summary seems unneeded to me. * the summary shouldn't end with a dot * your changelog entries are badly formatted. The version should be at the end of the line beginning with *. * a BR (BuildRequires) for libXext-devel is mmissing, and libX11-devel is required by libXext-devel. * In xmms.c it seems that a file is created in /tmp with a predictible name. If it is the case, there is a security issue, since it allows a symlink attack. * still in xmms.c it seems that conky dlopens some libs to do something with the music players. This won't work since the .so are in the devel packages. Is this code used in your package? If it is the case there is certainly something wrong upstream, and maybe the dlopened files should be below /usr/lib/xmms/, or conky should be linked against libxmms and not dlopen it. * is it on purpose that there are no requires for xmms/bmp...? * When I start conky I get a trace: $ conky *** buffer overflow detected ***: conky terminated ======= Backtrace: ========= /lib/libc.so.6(__chk_fail+0x41)[0x9f2161] /lib/libc.so.6(__strcpy_chk+0x43)[0x9f1663] conky[0x8064eed] /lib/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xdc)[0x926f2c] conky[0x804ab91] ======= Memory map: ======== 00111000-00116000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 379787 /usr/lib/libXdmcp.so.6.0.0 00116000-00117000 rwxp 00004000 03:03 379787 /usr/lib/libXdmcp.so.6.0.0 00196000-0019d000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 2412643 /lib/librt-2.4.90.so 0019d000-0019e000 r-xp 00006000 03:03 2412643 /lib/librt-2.4.90.so 0019e000-0019f000 rwxp 00007000 03:03 2412643 /lib/librt-2.4.90.so 002c7000-002cb000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 379797 /usr/lib/libXfixes.so.3.1.0 002cb000-002cc000 rwxp 00003000 03:03 379797 /usr/lib/libXfixes.so.3.1.0 0034e000-00360000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 377780 /usr/lib/libXft.so.2.1.2 00360000-00361000 rwxp 00012000 03:03 377780 /usr/lib/libXft.so.2.1.2 005b5000-005ce000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 2408357 /lib/ld-2.4.90.so 005ce000-005cf000 r-xp 00018000 03:03 2408357 /lib/ld-2.4.90.so 005cf000-005d0000 rwxp 00019000 03:03 2408357 /lib/ld-2.4.90.so 00624000-00649000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 2408914 /lib/libm-2.4.90.so 00649000-0064a000 r-xp 00024000 03:03 2408914 /lib/libm-2.4.90.so 0064a000-0064b000 rwxp 00025000 03:03 2408914 /lib/libm-2.4.90.so 006fd000-0077a000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 374846 /usr/lib/libfreetype.so.6.3.10 0077a000-0077d000 rwxp 0007d000 03:03 374846 /usr/lib/libfreetype.so.6.3.10 00911000-00a49000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 2408410 /lib/libc-2.4.90.so 00a49000-00a4b000 r-xp 00138000 03:03 2408410 /lib/libc-2.4.90.so 00a4b000-00a4c000 rwxp 0013a000 03:03 2408410 /lib/libc-2.4.90.so 00a4c000-00a4f000 rwxp 00a4c000 00:00 0 00a9c000-00aaf000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 2410955 /lib/libpthread-2.4.90.so 00aaf000-00ab0000 r-xp 00012000 03:03 2410955 /lib/libpthread-2.4.90.so 00ab0000-00ab1000 rwxp 00013000 03:03 2410955 /lib/libpthread-2.4.90.so 00ab1000-00ab3000 rwxp 00ab1000 00:00 0 00b21000-00c21000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 362396 /usr/lib/libX11.so.6.2.0 00c21000-00c25000 rwxp 000ff000 03:03 362396 /usr/lib/libX11.so.6.2.0 00c56000-00c61000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 2420666 /lib/libgcc_s-4.1.1-20060926.so.1 00c61000-00c62000 rwxp 0000a000 03:03 2420666 /lib/libgcc_s-4.1.1-20060926.so.1 00d1c000-00d1e000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 364990 /usr/lib/libXdamage.so.1.0.0 00d1e000-00d1f000 rwxp 00001000 03:03 364990 /usr/lib/libXdamage.so.1.0.0 00d48000-00d4a000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 2408862 /lib/libdl-2.4.90.so 00d4a000-00d4b000 r-xp 00001000 03:03 2408862 /lib/libdl-2.4.90.so 00d4b000-00d4c000 rwxp 00002000 03:03 2408862 /lib/libdl-2.4.90.so 00d52000-00d54000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 379786 /usr/lib/libXau.so.6.0.0 00d54000-00d55000 rwxp 00001000 03:03 379786 /usr/lib/libXau.so.6.0.0 00d57000-00d66000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 379793 /usr/lib/libXext.so.6.4.0 00d66000-00d67000 rwxp 0000e000 03:03 379793 /usr/lib/libXext.so.6.4.0 00d69000-00d88000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 2408514 /lib/libexpat.so.0.5.0 00d88000-00d8a000 rwxp 0001e000 03:03 2408514 /lib/libexpat.so.0.5.0 00df3000-00dfb000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 379789 /usr/lib/libXrender.so.1.3.0 00dfb000-00dfc000 rwxp 00007000 03:03 379789 /usr/lib/libXrender.so.1.3.0 00e89000-00eb0000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 361587 /usr/lib/libfontconfig.so.1.1.0 00eb0000-00eb8000 rwxp 00027000 03:03 361587 /usr/lib/libfontconfig.so.1.1.0 0324b000-032e8000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 2408445 /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0.1200.3 032e8000-032e9000 rwxp 0009c000 03:03 2408445 /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0.1200.3 032eb000-032f3000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 379812 /usr/lib/libSM.so.6.0.0 032f3000-032f4000 rwxp 00007000 03:03 379812 /usr/lib/libSM.so.6.0.0 032f6000-0330d000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 379811 /usr/lib/libICE.so.6.3.0 0330d000-0330e000 rwxp 00016000 03:03 379811 /usr/lib/libICE.so.6.3.0 0330e000-03310000 rwxp 0330e000 00:00 0 08048000-08071000 r-xp 00000000 03:03 380814 /usr/bin/conky 08071000-08073000 rwxp 00028000 03:03 380814 /usr/bin/conky 08073000-0807b000 rwxp 08073000 00:00 0 090b3000-090d4000 rwxp 090b3000 00:00 0 b7fa30Abandon -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 28 22:14:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 18:14:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208422] Review Request: wmctrl - A command line tool to interact with an EWMH/NetWM compatible X Window Manager. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609282214.k8SMEBjf018220@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wmctrl - A command line tool to interact with an EWMH/NetWM compatible X Window Manager. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208422 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-09-28 18:14 EST ------- Some comments for conky are relevant here (NEWS empty, bad changelog entries). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 28 22:39:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 18:39:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208250] Review Request: piklab - Development environment for applications based on PIC and dsPIC microcontrollers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609282239.k8SMdxSR019854@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: piklab - Development environment for applications based on PIC and dsPIC microcontrollers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208250 ------- Additional Comments From alain.portal at free.fr 2006-09-28 18:39 EST ------- Upstream report me a possible problem, libncurses seems not be detected your log: checking for main in -lcurses... no checking for main in -lncurses... no checking readline/readline.h usability... yes FC5: hecking for main in -lcurses... yes checking readline/readline.h usability... yes checking readline/readline.h presence... yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 28 23:08:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 19:08:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208200] Review Request: toped - IC Layout Editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609282308.k8SN8UHq021298@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: toped - IC Layout Editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208200 ------- Additional Comments From s_krustev at tiscali.co.uk 2006-09-28 19:08 EST ------- Fixes are in repository. I'll try to upload the new tarball tomorrow, meanwhile I need some time for tests and also expect some feedback from Sergey. If you spot something else - please let me know -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 28 23:26:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 19:26:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193898] Review Request: Jython - Java source interpreter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609282326.k8SNQ5wB022433@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Jython - Java source interpreter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193898 ------- Additional Comments From ifoox at redhat.com 2006-09-28 19:25 EST ------- Anthony, Any chance you could take a look at this soon? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 29 00:06:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 20:06:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208208] Review Request: MegaMek - a portable, network-enabled BattleTech engine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609290006.k8T06fSp025774@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: MegaMek - a portable, network-enabled BattleTech engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208208 overholt at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |overholt at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From overholt at redhat.com 2006-09-28 20:06 EST ------- I'll take this one. A few questions: - can we change the jar commands to not have -v flags? Or did you want them to have this? - can/should any of the included zip/jars be split out into separate packages? I'm thinking about tinyXML here; is it developed by the MegaMek developers? - collections.jar has the com.sun namespace but this is from GNU Classpath, right? - this is all redistributable, right? nist.gov and Oster.com stuff? And I know this isn't package review territory, but do we expect this to actually work? On my rawhide-ish (probably two or three days ago) system, it starts up and then appears to hang. I'll attach a screenshot. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 29 00:16:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 20:16:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208208] Review Request: MegaMek - a portable, network-enabled BattleTech engine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609290016.k8T0G6OH026400@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: MegaMek - a portable, network-enabled BattleTech engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208208 ------- Additional Comments From overholt at redhat.com 2006-09-28 20:15 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=137352) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=137352&action=view) screenshot just after startup The back window draws and then the front window appears to take over. If I switch windows and then switch back, nothing is re-drawn. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 29 00:18:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 20:18:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189188] Review Request: sqlgrey - postfix grey-listing policy service In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609290018.k8T0I1Q6026650@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sqlgrey - postfix grey-listing policy service https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189188 ------- Additional Comments From chris at chrisgrau.com 2006-09-28 20:17 EST ------- (In reply to comment #9) > > 4. Have you been able to determine the issue from comment #6 about it not > > working? > > Not yet, but until today I haven't taken a moment to look at it. Jumping in here, I installed this package on my secondary MX which is running FC-3. It works with the SQLite option; I haven't tested with MySQL or PgSQL. I also installed it on an FC-5 box for testing. On this box, it also appears to be working, but the init script gives some warnings: Name "DBIx::DBCluster::DEBUG" used only once: possible typo at /usr/sbin/sqlgrey line 2413. Name "DBIx::DBCluster::WRITE_HOSTS_NEVER_READ" used only once: possible typo at /usr/sbin/sqlgrey line 827. Name "DBIx::DBCluster::CLUSTERS" used only once: possible typo at /usr/sbin/sqlgrey line 818. I notice that the DBIx::DBCluster Perl module included in the sqlgrey distribution isn't being installed. In my brief review of the code, I'm not sure including the module would help much; it doesn't appear to ever get loaded by the program. I don't see anything about it in the sf.net bug tracker, but maybe we can include a note about it? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 29 00:20:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 20:20:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208208] Review Request: MegaMek - a portable, network-enabled BattleTech engine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609290020.k8T0KRjo026894@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: MegaMek - a portable, network-enabled BattleTech engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208208 ------- Additional Comments From fitzsim at redhat.com 2006-09-28 20:20 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > Created an attachment (id=137352) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=137352&action=view) [edit] > screenshot just after startup > > The back window draws and then the front window appears to take over. If I > switch windows and then switch back, nothing is re-drawn. Can you paste the contents of /usr/lib/security/classpath.security here? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 29 00:31:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 20:31:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199108] Review Request: gutenprint: Printer Drivers Package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609290031.k8T0VC0g028321@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gutenprint: Printer Drivers Package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199108 ------- Additional Comments From peter at thecodergeek.com 2006-09-28 20:31 EST ------- (In reply to comment #70) > Peter, > you confused me. I rechecked for .so files and found that > rpm -ql gutenprint | grep so > [...] > This clearly shows that packaging for gutenpeint is corret. isn't it? That looks correct to me. Thanks for fixing it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 29 00:36:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 20:36:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208208] Review Request: MegaMek - a portable, network-enabled BattleTech engine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609290036.k8T0atig028857@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: MegaMek - a portable, network-enabled BattleTech engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208208 ------- Additional Comments From fitzsim at redhat.com 2006-09-28 20:36 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > I'll take this one. > > A few questions: > > - can we change the jar commands to not have -v flags? Or did you want them to > have this? Sure, I'll remove the -v flags. > - can/should any of the included zip/jars be split out into separate packages? > I'm thinking about tinyXML here; is it developed by the MegaMek developers? No, I don't think it would be worth it. tinyXML is designed to be embedded in applications. Also, because MegaMek is a standalone game, and not a library, bundling these small jars, will not pollute the packaging namespace. If it turns out that other applications want to use one of MegaMek's bundled components, I'll factor it out into a separate package (though, that is unlikely, given how small and old the components are). > - collections.jar has the com.sun namespace but this is from GNU Classpath, right? Right. > - this is all redistributable, right? nist.gov and Oster.com stuff? Yes: collections.jar: GPL + linking exception Ostermiller.jar: GPL getopt (bundled in Ostermiller.jar): LGPL PngEncoder.jar: LGPL TabPanel.jar: public domain tinyXML: GPL > And I know this isn't package review territory, but do we expect this to > actually work? On my rawhide-ish (probably two or three days ago) system, it > starts up and then appears to hang. I'll attach a screenshot. This may be https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200653 again. If it's not already there, try adding this line to /usr/lib/security/classpath.security: securerandom.source=file:/dev/random This line is included in Rawhide libgcj, but doesn't get added on update since classpath.security is modified by rebuild-security-providers. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 29 01:40:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 21:40:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199108] Review Request: gutenprint: Printer Drivers Package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609290140.k8T1eEqN031518@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gutenprint: Printer Drivers Package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199108 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-09-28 21:40 EST ------- In reply to comment #72: Nope. You missed 3 lines you need to change from _libdir to the cups_serverbin: < rm -rf %{buildroot}%{_libdir}/cups/backend/* < rm -rf %{buildroot}%{_libdir}/cups/filter/commandtocanon < rm -rf %{buildroot}%{_libdir}/cups/filter/commandtoepson --- > rm -rf %{buildroot}%{cups_serverbin}/backend/* > rm -rf %{buildroot}%{cups_serverbin}/filter/commandtocanon > rm -rf %{buildroot}%{cups_serverbin}/filter/commandtoepson Can you change those and spin a -13 release? If that looks good and builds ok, and given that we have now had some favorable comments from testers, I am ready to approve... thanks for your patience... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 29 01:50:41 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 21:50:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208208] Review Request: MegaMek - a portable, network-enabled BattleTech engine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609290150.k8T1ofmo031965@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: MegaMek - a portable, network-enabled BattleTech engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208208 ------- Additional Comments From fitzsim at redhat.com 2006-09-28 21:50 EST ------- I've removed the -v flags in the jar commands and added -qq to the unzip command. See URLs in opening comment. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 29 02:26:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 22:26:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201000] Review Request: libFoundation - A free implementation of OpenStep's Foundation Kit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609290226.k8T2Qh0D001308@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libFoundation - A free implementation of OpenStep's Foundation Kit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201000 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2006-09-28 22:26 EST ------- (In reply to comment #12) > I'm not sure what impact this would have on other dependent projects, and it's > for fixing something that (currently) isn't broke. I also consulted the > packaging commitee and most agree on that (but we were only 5 out of 10 > present). Sorry, due to an unplanned commitment, I could not make it yesterday. If I had been around, I would have voted against "allowing /usr/include/extensions" > I suggest the following: Let the package pass as is (at least wrt to headers, if > the are other issues, they need to be fixed, of course), and I will take the > header topic upstream. So should a clash with say glibc's assumed future > extensions folder come up, the issue would have been ironed out at the source > and not the package. Do you agree? I don't fully understand what you are trying to say, but the answer probable is "no". IMO, THIS package is misbehaving and therefore MUST be fixed. If other packages contain hard-coded dependencies on this misbehavior, all necessary changes MUST be reflected to them, too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 29 02:54:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 22:54:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207806] Review Request: evolution-bogofilter - A plugin for bogofilter support in evolution In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609290254.k8T2sFJs003312@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: evolution-bogofilter - A plugin for bogofilter support in evolution https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207806 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |kevin at tummy.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-09-28 22:54 EST ------- I'm not an evolution user, but I would be happy to review this anyhow. ;) Look for a full review in a bit here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 29 03:03:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 23:03:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207806] Review Request: evolution-bogofilter - A plugin for bogofilter support in evolution In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609290303.k8T33LOB003944@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: evolution-bogofilter - A plugin for bogofilter support in evolution https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207806 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-09-28 23:03 EST ------- OK - Package name OK - Spec file matches base package name. OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines. OK - License (GPL) OK - License field in spec matches See below - License file included in package OK - Spec in American English OK - Spec is legible. OK - Sources match upstream md5sum: 668f11a7f04a1af32b1077420854bd98 bf-eplugin-0.2.0.tar.gz 668f11a7f04a1af32b1077420854bd98 bf-eplugin-0.2.0.tar.gz.1 OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch. OK - BuildRequires correct OK - Package owns all the directories it creates. OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files. See below - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. OK - Package has a correct %clean section. OK - Spec has consistant macro usage. OK - Package is code or permissible content. OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime. OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. See below - No rpmlint output. SHOULD Items: See below - Should include License or ask upstream to include it. OK - Should build in mock. Issues: 1. rpmlint says: W: evolution-bogofilter no-url-tag W: evolution-bogofilter no-documentation W: evolution-bogofilter non-conffile-in-etc /etc/gconf/schemas/bf- eplugin.schemas 2. Might include the following as %doc files? AUTHORS ChangeLog COPYING NEWS README 3. Might change defattr from %defattr(-,root,root) to %defattr(-,root,root,-) 4. I suppose it makes sense to call this evolution-bogofilter instead of the upstream name of bf-eplugin. Perhaps upstream could even be talked into changing the name there? no one is going to know they should look for bf-eplugin for this IMHO. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 29 03:16:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 23:16:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208420] Review Request: conky - A system monitor for X originally based on the torsmo code In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609290316.k8T3G4Se004875@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: conky - A system monitor for X originally based on the torsmo code https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208420 miker5slow at grandecom.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |177841 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From miker5slow at grandecom.net 2006-09-28 23:15 EST ------- Patrice, thanks for looking at this one so close for me. * Your first few comments should be a simple enough fix. * The xmms issue you speak of I am getting with the developers of the app about because I am not sure. * The reason I dont have a require for xmms/bmp is because I wanted support for them but not to require them since they are not needed for the app to function I will fix these issue and post an update soon, thanks for you help. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 29 03:50:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 23:50:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188974] Review Request: mesa-libGLw - Xt / Motif OpenGL widgets In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609290350.k8T3oCON007475@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mesa-libGLw - Xt / Motif OpenGL widgets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188974 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2006-09-28 23:50 EST ------- * is it true that -devel don't requires lesstif-devel? No. libGLw is a Motif library and uses Motif. libGLw depends upon the Motif-API it has been built against and libGLw-devel depends up the Motif-API it has been built against. (More precisely: libGLw depends upon the details of the XmPrimitive widget class being provided by the motif implementation underneath) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 29 04:21:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 00:21:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199108] Review Request: gutenprint: Printer Drivers Package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609290421.k8T4LVv0009490@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gutenprint: Printer Drivers Package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199108 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-09-29 00:21 EST ------- Updated Package:- Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/pnemade/gutenprint/gutenprint.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/pnemade/gutenprint/gutenprint-5.0.0-0.13.fc6.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 29 04:57:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 00:57:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208250] Review Request: piklab - Development environment for applications based on PIC and dsPIC microcontrollers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609290457.k8T4vKZx010929@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: piklab - Development environment for applications based on PIC and dsPIC microcontrollers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208250 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-09-29 00:57 EST ------- (In reply to comment #12) > Upstream report me a possible problem, libncurses seems not be detected > your log: > checking for main in -lcurses... no > checking for main in -lncurses... no > checking readline/readline.h usability... yes > > FC5: > hecking for main in -lcurses... yes > checking readline/readline.h usability... yes > checking readline/readline.h presence... yes > Good catch, thanks. Actually, adding "ncurses-devel" for BR seems to work for FC6-devel i386 mockbuild. >From changelog of ncurses rpm: * Sat Jul 08 2006 Miroslav Lichvar 5.5-20 - update to patch 20060701 - don't strip libraries, chmod +x them - move .so links to devel package - add gpm-devel to buildrequires - spec cleanup -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 29 05:07:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 01:07:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199108] Review Request: gutenprint: Printer Drivers Package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609290507.k8T57LeZ011249@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gutenprint: Printer Drivers Package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199108 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-09-29 01:07 EST ------- ok. I see only two more minor issues: - /usr/lib/gutenprint/5.0.0/modules/ has .la files in it still. Can you remove those at the same time you remove other la files? - You should own (ie, add to files in main package): /usr/share/gutenprint/5.0.0 /usr/share/gutenprint It would be nice to remove the dependency on gtk+, but I don't see an easy way to do this off hand. Anyone else see an easy way to do so? The -13 builds fine on i386 and x86_64 here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 29 05:43:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 01:43:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208436] Review Request: kphotobymail - Kphotobymail is a PyQT based application for uploading photos to flickr account. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609290543.k8T5hcpC012984@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kphotobymail - Kphotobymail is a PyQT based application for uploading photos to flickr account. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208436 ------- Additional Comments From kushaldas at gmail.com 2006-09-29 01:43 EST ------- Spec URL: http://freeshell.in/~kushal/kphotobymail.spec SRPM URL: http://freeshell.in/~kushal/kphotobymail-0.3.2-2.src.rpm Added deskto-file-install rpmlint still showing W: kphotobymail conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/kphotobymail.data E: kphotobymail non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/Kphotobymail/__init__.py 0644 where there is no problem in replacing /etc/kphotobymail.data Second one .. no idea, but it is having required permissions. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 29 05:45:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 01:45:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208436] Review Request: kphotobymail - Kphotobymail is a PyQT based application for uploading photos to flickr account. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609290545.k8T5jtEf013070@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kphotobymail - Kphotobymail is a PyQT based application for uploading photos to flickr account. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208436 kushaldas at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- URL| |http://kphotobymail.sourcefo | |rge.net -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 29 06:24:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 02:24:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208398] Review Request: luvcview - Webcam Viewer Application In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609290624.k8T6OKZD014868@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: luvcview - Webcam Viewer Application https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208398 sundaram at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |sundaram at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From sundaram at redhat.com 2006-09-29 02:24 EST ------- Why not submit the kernel driver for review too? Having a package that requires users to download kernel drivers from source and compile it is far from the ideal situation. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 29 06:44:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 02:44:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188974] Review Request: mesa-libGLw - Xt / Motif OpenGL widgets In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609290644.k8T6iY6l015811@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mesa-libGLw - Xt / Motif OpenGL widgets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188974 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-09-29 02:44 EST ------- (In reply to comment #37) > * is it true that -devel don't requires lesstif-devel? > No. libGLw is a Motif library and uses Motif. So there is a missing Requires: lesstif-devel in mesa-libGLw-devel > (More precisely: libGLw depends upon the details of the XmPrimitive widget class > being provided by the motif implementation underneath) Thanks, I have spotted where it is now. So it also seems to me that there is a missing #include in libGLw headers, like #include And since GLwDrawA.h uses XmCR_EXPOSE there could also be a missing include for Xm/Xm.h -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 29 07:23:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 03:23:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208250] Review Request: piklab - Development environment for applications based on PIC and dsPIC microcontrollers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609290723.k8T7NOag017584@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: piklab - Development environment for applications based on PIC and dsPIC microcontrollers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208250 ------- Additional Comments From aportal at univ-montp2.fr 2006-09-29 03:23 EST ------- The problem is to know if I have to add this BR or if this BR is missing in a package from which pikloop depends. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 29 07:24:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 03:24:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199108] Review Request: gutenprint: Printer Drivers Package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609290724.k8T7OL46017699@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gutenprint: Printer Drivers Package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199108 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-09-29 03:24 EST ------- Kevin, Done. Updated packages can be found at Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/pnemade/gutenprint/gutenprint.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/pnemade/gutenprint/gutenprint-5.0.0-0.14.fc6.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 29 07:25:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 03:25:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208250] Review Request: piklab - Development environment for applications based on PIC and dsPIC microcontrollers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609290725.k8T7PHEA017800@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: piklab - Development environment for applications based on PIC and dsPIC microcontrollers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208250 ------- Additional Comments From aportal at univ-montp2.fr 2006-09-29 03:25 EST ------- (In reply to comment #14) > The problem is to know if I have to add this BR or if this BR is missing in a > package from which pikloop depends. piklab of course :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 29 07:27:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 03:27:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188974] Review Request: mesa-libGLw - Xt / Motif OpenGL widgets In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609290727.k8T7REqI017974@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mesa-libGLw - Xt / Motif OpenGL widgets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188974 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2006-09-29 03:27 EST ------- (In reply to comment #38) > (In reply to comment #37) > > (More precisely: libGLw depends upon the details of the XmPrimitive widget class > > being provided by the motif implementation underneath) > > Thanks, I have spotted where it is now. So it also seems to me that > there is a missing #include in libGLw headers, like > > #include > > And since GLwDrawA.h uses XmCR_EXPOSE > there could also be a missing include for Xm/Xm.h That's one of the oditities about the libGLwM widgets. mesa-libGlw is a clone of SGI's libGLw. SGI's libGLw's headers (link provided above) did not include them and requires apps using the GLw widgets explicitly include them when needed. So, if you want to change this API, communicate this upstream Mesa. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 29 07:41:25 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 03:41:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199405] Review Request: vtk - The Visualization Toolkit - A high level 3D visualization library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609290741.k8T7fPQE019043@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vtk - The Visualization Toolkit - A high level 3D visualization library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199405 ------- Additional Comments From Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net 2006-09-29 03:41 EST ------- (In reply to comment #23) > there is still a bug that was inserting the package build path when trying > to build another project that uses VTK. Apparently this is a known bug: > > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=388736 Thanks, I'll fix that! > Regarding the patent issues, I haven't fully researched the issue, but I was > recently referred to these links by someone who uses VTK: > > http://public.kitware.com/pipermail/vtk-developers/2005-February/003131.html > http://public.kitware.com/pipermail/vtk-developers/2002-July/001757.html > > It sounds to me like the patented subdirectory was removed from the source > tree with release 5.0 because of the problems it was causing. That's half the story. Apparently the authors themselves have patents on algorithms in the code, they only removed foreign algorithms. I *assume* that the authors would grant rights to use within Fedora and similar projects, but I'd only like to ask if Fedora Legal would accept such a modus. I'm going to raise that issue on the extras list. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 29 07:53:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 03:53:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199681] Review Request: slab In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609290753.k8T7ri7I020197@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: slab https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199681 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-09-29 03:53 EST ------- (In reply to comment #48) > Ok it took a while b/c real life job took a to big toll on my time, but i've > finaly found some time to 'finish' this package. > > Upstream (SuSe) had a new version (even though they still call it 0.6.2) which > intergrates a lot of fixes from SLED, but they also reformatted all the source > code and changed the library sources quite a bit, so i've had to re-base all the > patches by hand, which took a bit of time :-) > > One of the 'major' bugs it fixes is that on startup 'Favorite Applications' > would only show 6 entries, even if more were defined; This seems to work > 'correctly' now, and it will show all fav applications on startup now. > > The new package can be found at: > http://develop.intermax.nl/slab/slab.spec > http://develop.intermax.nl/slab/slab-0.6.2-3.src.rpm I found only this as latest package to review here. I tried mock build for i386 development an dgot following results aclocal:configure.in:16: warning: macro `AM_PROG_LIBTOOL' not found in library configure.in:16: error: possibly undefined macro: AM_PROG_LIBTOOL If this token and others are legitimate, please use m4_pattern_allow. See the Autoconf documentation. autoreconf: /usr/bin/autoconf failed with exit status: 1 error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.1788 (%build) Am i missing something? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 29 08:16:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 04:16:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208250] Review Request: piklab - Development environment for applications based on PIC and dsPIC microcontrollers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609290816.k8T8GkM3023283@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: piklab - Development environment for applications based on PIC and dsPIC microcontrollers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208250 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-09-29 04:16 EST ------- (In reply to comment #15) > (In reply to comment #14) > > The problem is to know if I have to add this BR or if this BR is missing in > a > > package from which pikloop depends. > > piklab of course :-) Well, configure requests the existence of -lcurses. in FC5, this is in ncurses, which are installed by minimal buildroot. However, in FC6, libcurses.so is moved to ncurses-devel. So you have to add ncurses-devel to BuildRequires and the problem for rebuilding is resolved. I have not yet reviewed this fully, however, * rpmlint complaints about long summary. It says that summary should have no longer than 79 characters. * Please add "ncurses-devel" to BuildRequiers (this should be no problem for FC5, too). * Perhaps /etc/security/consoles.perms.d/ should be /etc/security/console.perms.d/ ? (the latter is owned by pam) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 29 08:27:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 04:27:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205343] Review Request: cohoba - Cohoba is a GNOME interface for Telepathy. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609290827.k8T8Rgdq024298@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cohoba - Cohoba is a GNOME interface for Telepathy. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205343 ------- Additional Comments From sander at hoentjen.eu 2006-09-29 04:27 EST ------- http://fedora.hoentjen.eu/telepathy/cohoba.spec http://fedora.hoentjen.eu/telepathy/cohoba-0.0.4-1.src.rpm I think all issues are fixed, cohoba is updated to latest release which has a message when no connection managers are found. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 29 08:35:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 04:35:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207173] Review Request: pymsn - Python libraries for MSN Messenger network In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609290835.k8T8Zajp024965@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pymsn - Python libraries for MSN Messenger network https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207173 sander at hoentjen.eu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From sander at hoentjen.eu 2006-09-29 04:35 EST ------- Good: - rpmlint checks return nothing - package meets naming guidelines - package meets packaging guidelines - license (LGPL) OK, text in %doc, matches source - spec file legible, in am. english - source matches upstream - package compiles on devel (x86_64) - no missing BR - no unnecessary BR - no locales - not relocatable - owns all directories that it creates - no duplicate files - permissions ok - %clean ok - macro use consistent - code, not content - no need for -docs - nothing in %doc affects runtime - no need for .desktop file APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 29 08:42:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 04:42:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208250] Review Request: piklab - Development environment for applications based on PIC and dsPIC microcontrollers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609290842.k8T8gHHU025553@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: piklab - Development environment for applications based on PIC and dsPIC microcontrollers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208250 ------- Additional Comments From aportal at univ-montp2.fr 2006-09-29 04:42 EST ------- (In reply to comment #16) > (In reply to comment #15) > > (In reply to comment #14) > > > The problem is to know if I have to add this BR or if this BR is missing in > > a > > > package from which pikloop depends. > > > > piklab of course :-) > > Well, configure requests the existence of -lcurses. > in FC5, this is in ncurses, which are installed by minimal buildroot. > However, in FC6, libcurses.so is moved to ncurses-devel. > > So you have to add ncurses-devel to BuildRequires and the problem > for rebuilding is resolved. > > I have not yet reviewed this fully, however, > * rpmlint complaints about long summary. It says that summary should > have no longer than 79 characters. I really don't understand, my rpmlint don't complaints! I'll fix... > * Please add "ncurses-devel" to BuildRequiers (this should be no problem > for FC5, too). Before doing this change, I'm waiting one hour or two for an answer to my question on Extras list. > * Perhaps /etc/security/consoles.perms.d/ should be > /etc/security/console.perms.d/ ? (the latter is owned by pam) Oups, you're right, it's a typo. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 29 08:51:16 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 04:51:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207607] Review Request: telepathy-butterfly - MSN connection manager for Telepathy In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609290851.k8T8pGBr026192@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: telepathy-butterfly - MSN connection manager for Telepathy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207607 ------- Additional Comments From sander at hoentjen.eu 2006-09-29 04:51 EST ------- can you switch telepathy-filesystem to noarch? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 29 09:03:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 05:03:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208250] Review Request: piklab - Development environment for applications based on PIC and dsPIC microcontrollers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609290903.k8T93T94027197@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: piklab - Development environment for applications based on PIC and dsPIC microcontrollers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208250 ------- Additional Comments From aportal at univ-montp2.fr 2006-09-29 05:03 EST ------- Spec URL: http://linuxelectronique.free.fr/download/fedora/5/SPECS/piklab.spec SRPM URL: http://linuxelectronique.free.fr/download/fedora/5/SRPMS/piklab-0.11.3-3.src.rpm %changelog * Wed Sep 29 2006 Alain Portal 0.11.3-3 - Add doc about how to complete full feature installation - Fix typo on security pathname - Short summary - Add BR ncurses-devel for FC6 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 29 09:03:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 05:03:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 173459] Review Request: initng In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609290903.k8T93kgd027228@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 daner964 at student.liu.se changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From daner964 at student.liu.se 2006-09-29 05:03 EST ------- (In reply to comment #344) > I'd say simply replace the old files with the new ones. Ok. I'll do that. Well, since initng and initng-ifiles now has been successfully built in FE-devel, I guess it's time to close this ticket. A big thanks to everyone that has been involved. This is comment #345. This bug was open for 10 months and 12 days. Over and out. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 29 09:04:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 05:04:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 176581] Review Request: fnord -- A very fast HTTP server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609290904.k8T94cmR027349@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fnord -- A very fast HTTP server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176581 Bug 176581 depends on bug 173459, which changed state. Bug 173459 Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 29 09:30:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 05:30:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203520] Review Request: evolution-brutus In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609290930.k8T9U6eY028964@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: evolution-brutus Alias: evolution-brutus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203520 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-09-29 05:30 EST ------- Well, I cannot formally review this package because I am not a sponsor, so I hope someone who has sponsor membership would review this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 29 10:57:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 06:57:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208250] Review Request: piklab - Development environment for applications based on PIC and dsPIC microcontrollers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609291057.k8TAvlBF003335@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: piklab - Development environment for applications based on PIC and dsPIC microcontrollers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208250 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-09-29 06:57 EST ------- Okay. Full review for piklab. 1. From http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines * Use rpmlint W: piklab dangling-relative-symlink \ /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/piklab/common ../doc/common - Well, this warning itself is no problem, however, the problem is that this symlink is broken. Perhaps this should point to ../common . 2. From http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines : = Nothing. 3. Other things I have noticed: - Well, /etc/security/console.perms.d/pickit1.perms /etc/security/console.perms.d/pickit2.perms These two files are same. Acutally spec file says: %{__install} -pm 644 %{SOURCE3} \ %{buildroot}%{_sysconfdir}/security/console.perms.d/pickit1.perms %{__install} -pm 644 %{SOURCE3} \ %{buildroot}%{_sysconfdir}/security/console.perms.d/pickit2.perms I suspect only one of these two are necessary. Also, while this is not documented, the files under /etc/security/console.perms.d/ seem to have the names like -.perms (like 50-default.perms). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 29 11:20:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 07:20:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208250] Review Request: piklab - Development environment for applications based on PIC and dsPIC microcontrollers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609291120.k8TBKniL004877@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: piklab - Development environment for applications based on PIC and dsPIC microcontrollers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208250 ------- Additional Comments From aportal at univ-montp2.fr 2006-09-29 07:20 EST ------- (In reply to comment #19) > Okay. Full review for piklab. > > 1. From http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines > > * Use rpmlint > W: piklab dangling-relative-symlink \ > /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/piklab/common ../doc/common > - Well, this warning itself is no problem, however, the problem > is that this symlink is broken. > Perhaps this should point to ../common . No. KDE recently changed /usr/share/doc/HTML/$LANG/common in /usr/share/doc/HTML/$LANG/docs/common. See https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-extras-list/2006-September/msg00794.html and some follow up. > 2. From http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines : > = Nothing. > > 3. Other things I have noticed: > - Well, > > /etc/security/console.perms.d/pickit1.perms > /etc/security/console.perms.d/pickit2.perms > > These two files are same. Acutally spec file says: > %{__install} -pm 644 %{SOURCE3} \ > %{buildroot}%{_sysconfdir}/security/console.perms.d/pickit1.perms > %{__install} -pm 644 %{SOURCE3} \ > %{buildroot}%{_sysconfdir}/security/console.perms.d/pickit2.perms > > I suspect only one of these two are necessary. No, this is an error, the second should be %{SOURCE4} > Also, while this is not documented, the files under > /etc/security/console.perms.d/ seem to have the names like > -.perms (like 50-default.perms). I don't know how to choose a number. This configuration is taken from http://piklab.sourceforge.net/support.php section "for distributions using udev and PAM. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 29 11:48:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 07:48:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208254] Review Request: pikloops - Code generator for PIC delays In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609291148.k8TBmOp5006816@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pikloops - Code generator for PIC delays https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208254 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-09-29 07:48 EST ------- One question. Why does /usr/share/applications/kde/pikloops.desktop have OnlyShowIn=KDE; ? I tried to remove this, and PiKLoops icon appears on "Programming" session, so I think this can be shown in GNOME, too. Other things seem to be okay. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 29 12:03:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 08:03:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208254] Review Request: pikloops - Code generator for PIC delays In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609291203.k8TC3eU2007902@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pikloops - Code generator for PIC delays https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208254 ------- Additional Comments From aportal at univ-montp2.fr 2006-09-29 08:03 EST ------- (In reply to comment #9) > One question. > > Why does /usr/share/applications/kde/pikloops.desktop have > OnlyShowIn=KDE; ? > > I tried to remove this, and PiKLoops icon appears on "Programming" > session, so I think this can be shown in GNOME, too. It seems to me that was to prevent duplicate desktop entry in menu. Do I have to remove it? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 29 12:11:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 08:11:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199681] Review Request: slab In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609291211.k8TCB2wm008175@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: slab https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199681 ------- Additional Comments From chabotc at xs4all.nl 2006-09-29 08:11 EST ------- Good catch, this was caused by some missing build-requires (nl: libtool, intltools, wireless-tools). Added those and uploaded the fixed releases to. To make things more interesting, in fedora-devel its wireless-tools-devel and in fc5 its just wireless-tools, so i've added some distro specific conditional BR's to make it work in both situations; After these modifications, it mock builds correctly again under fc5 & fc6/devel The results can be found at at: http://chabotc.nl/slab/slab.spec http://chabotc.nl/slab/slab-0.6.2-4.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 29 12:11:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 08:11:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208254] Review Request: pikloops - Code generator for PIC delays In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609291211.k8TCBnr9008254@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pikloops - Code generator for PIC delays https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208254 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-09-29 08:11 EST ------- (In reply to comment #10) > (In reply to comment #9) > > One question. > > > > Why does /usr/share/applications/kde/pikloops.desktop have > > OnlyShowIn=KDE; ? > > > It seems to me that was to prevent duplicate desktop entry in menu. > Do I have to remove it? Do you see some duplicate in KDE? In GNOME (I use GNOME), when the line OnlyShowIn=KDE; is removed, the PiKLoops seems to appear only in "Programming" entry and to have no duplicates. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 29 12:18:34 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 08:18:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208250] Review Request: piklab - Development environment for applications based on PIC and dsPIC microcontrollers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609291218.k8TCIYvn008545@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: piklab - Development environment for applications based on PIC and dsPIC microcontrollers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208250 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-09-29 08:18 EST ------- (In reply to comment #20) > (In reply to comment #19) > > /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/piklab/common ../doc/common > > - Well, this warning itself is no problem, however, the problem > > is that this symlink is broken. > > Perhaps this should point to ../common . > > No. KDE recently changed /usr/share/doc/HTML/$LANG/common > in /usr/share/doc/HTML/$LANG/docs/common. Well, then what package owns /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/docs/common _NOW_ ? I use rawhide, and the newest rawhide kdelibs-3.5.4-6.fc6 owns /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/common, however, my system doesn't have /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/docs/common directory. So my opinition is: * If some package actually owns /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/docs/common, this package should require the package (I am now trying to search for it by yum, however for some reason I don't know yum is very slow for now!!) * If no package owns the directory _NOW_, /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/piklab/common should point to ../common as before till some package gets to own /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/docs/common. > > 3. Other things I have noticed: > > - Well, > > > > /etc/security/console.perms.d/pickit1.perms > > /etc/security/console.perms.d/pickit2.perms > > > > These two files are same. Acutally spec file says: > > %{__install} -pm 644 %{SOURCE3} \ > > %{buildroot}%{_sysconfdir}/security/console.perms.d/pickit1.perms > > %{__install} -pm 644 %{SOURCE3} \ > > %{buildroot}%{_sysconfdir}/security/console.perms.d/pickit2.perms > > > No, this is an error, the second should be %{SOURCE4} Okay. Just fix as it should be. > > > Also, while this is not documented, the files under > > /etc/security/console.perms.d/ seem to have the names like > > -.perms (like 50-default.perms). > > I don't know how to choose a number. > This configuration is taken from http://piklab.sourceforge.net/support.php > section "for distributions using udev and PAM. This is not documented and you don't have to add the number if you don't want to. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 29 12:35:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 08:35:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207607] Review Request: telepathy-butterfly - MSN connection manager for Telepathy In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609291235.k8TCZ5U3009362@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: telepathy-butterfly - MSN connection manager for Telepathy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207607 ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at ameritech.net 2006-09-29 08:34 EST ------- Yeah, I can make the filesystem a noarch package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 29 12:35:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 08:35:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205343] Review Request: cohoba - Cohoba is a GNOME interface for Telepathy. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609291235.k8TCZqFj009436@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cohoba - Cohoba is a GNOME interface for Telepathy. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205343 bdpepple at ameritech.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |207607 ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at ameritech.net 2006-09-29 08:35 EST ------- It looks like all the issues in comment #7 & comment #10 have been addressed. The only blocker that I see is that the package needs to require the telepathy-filesystem package since it has files in the %{_datadir}/telepathy/managers/ directory. Therefore this bug also depends on Bug #207607 which has that package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 29 12:35:55 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 08:35:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207607] Review Request: telepathy-butterfly - MSN connection manager for Telepathy In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609291235.k8TCZtP8009460@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: telepathy-butterfly - MSN connection manager for Telepathy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207607 bdpepple at ameritech.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |205343 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 29 12:40:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 08:40:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208254] Review Request: pikloops - Code generator for PIC delays In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609291240.k8TCe3qf009733@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pikloops - Code generator for PIC delays https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208254 ------- Additional Comments From aportal at univ-montp2.fr 2006-09-29 08:40 EST ------- (In reply to comment #11) > > Do you see some duplicate in KDE? No, only one. I don't understand why I have to relogin to see the new entry in the menu... > In GNOME (I use GNOME), when the line > OnlyShowIn=KDE; is removed, the PiKLoops seems to appear only in > "Programming" entry and to have no duplicates. And you see nothing if it isn't removed? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 29 12:50:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 08:50:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201006] Review Request: HelixPlayer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609291250.k8TCoCTR010617@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: HelixPlayer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201006 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-09-29 08:50 EST ------- OK, looks good, APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 29 12:54:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 08:54:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208254] Review Request: pikloops - Code generator for PIC delays In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609291254.k8TCsU65011076@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pikloops - Code generator for PIC delays https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208254 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-09-29 08:54 EST ------- (In reply to comment #12) > (In reply to comment #11) > > > > Do you see some duplicate in KDE? > > No, only one. > I don't understand why I have to relogin to see the new entry in the menu... Umm.. I don't know either because I use GNOME... > > In GNOME (I use GNOME), when the line > > OnlyShowIn=KDE; is removed, the PiKLoops seems to appear only in > > "Programming" entry and to have no duplicates. > > And you see nothing if it isn't removed? Yes, actually I see nothing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 29 13:03:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 09:03:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208250] Review Request: piklab - Development environment for applications based on PIC and dsPIC microcontrollers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609291303.k8TD3UOa012056@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: piklab - Development environment for applications based on PIC and dsPIC microcontrollers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208250 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-09-29 09:03 EST ------- (In reply to comment #21) > > Well, then what package owns /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/docs/common > _NOW_ ? I finished searching for this by yum. The result is, no package owns this (in rawhide). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 29 13:05:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 09:05:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208250] Review Request: piklab - Development environment for applications based on PIC and dsPIC microcontrollers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609291305.k8TD5943012242@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: piklab - Development environment for applications based on PIC and dsPIC microcontrollers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208250 ------- Additional Comments From aportal at univ-montp2.fr 2006-09-29 09:04 EST ------- (In reply to comment #21) > > No. KDE recently changed /usr/share/doc/HTML/$LANG/common > > in /usr/share/doc/HTML/$LANG/docs/common. > > Well, then what package owns /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/docs/common > _NOW_ ? I use rawhide, and the newest rawhide kdelibs-3.5.4-6.fc6 > owns /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/common, however, my system doesn't have > /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/docs/common directory. The /usr/share/doc/HTML/$LANG/docs/common is owned by kde-i18n-$LANG. You right, as english is the default language /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/common is owned by kdelibs. But I thought that /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/docs/common was owned by kde-i18n-English, but this package don't exist ;-) This is the exception. So, for all languages but english, common is in $LANG/docs/, for english, it is in $LANG/ > So my opinition is: > * If some package actually owns /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/docs/common, > this package should require the package (I am now trying to search > for it by yum, however for some reason I don't know yum is very > slow for now!!) > * If no package owns the directory _NOW_, > /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/piklab/common should point to ../common > as before till some package gets to own /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/docs/common. > > > > Also, while this is not documented, the files under > > > /etc/security/console.perms.d/ seem to have the names like > > > -.perms (like 50-default.perms). > > > > I don't know how to choose a number. > > This configuration is taken from http://piklab.sourceforge.net/support.php > > section "for distributions using udev and PAM. > > This is not documented and you don't have to add the number if > you don't want to. As I don't know choosing a number, I'll don't add. I'll see later when I'll get more informations. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 29 13:07:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 09:07:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208254] Review Request: pikloops - Code generator for PIC delays In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609291307.k8TD7Klt012489@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pikloops - Code generator for PIC delays https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208254 ------- Additional Comments From aportal at univ-montp2.fr 2006-09-29 09:07 EST ------- (In reply to comment #13) > (In reply to comment #12) > > (In reply to comment #11) > > > > > > Do you see some duplicate in KDE? > > > > No, only one. > > I don't understand why I have to relogin to see the new entry in the menu... > Umm.. I don't know either because I use GNOME... > > > > In GNOME (I use GNOME), when the line > > > OnlyShowIn=KDE; is removed, the PiKLoops seems to appear only in > > > "Programming" entry and to have no duplicates. > > > > And you see nothing if it isn't removed? > > Yes, actually I see nothing. OK, I'll update the desktop file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 29 13:15:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 09:15:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208254] Review Request: pikloops - Code generator for PIC delays In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609291315.k8TDFgeB013305@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pikloops - Code generator for PIC delays https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208254 ------- Additional Comments From aportal at univ-montp2.fr 2006-09-29 09:15 EST ------- Spec URL: http://linuxelectronique.free.fr/download/fedora/5/SPECS/pikloops.spec SRPM URL: http://linuxelectronique.free.fr/download/fedora/5/SRPMS/pikloops-0.2.1-4.src.rpm %changelog * Thu Sep 28 2006 Alain Portal 0.2.1-4 - Update %%{SOURCE1} which don't contain "OnlyShowIn=KDE;" any more -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 29 13:24:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 09:24:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208254] Review Request: pikloops - Code generator for PIC delays In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609291324.k8TDO7iP013731@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pikloops - Code generator for PIC delays https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208254 ------- Additional Comments From aportal at univ-montp2.fr 2006-09-29 09:24 EST ------- (In reply to comment #14) > > > I don't understand why I have to relogin to see the new entry in the > menu... > > Umm.. I don't know either because I use GNOME... Grrrr! I found... That was because there wasn't "Application" in categories. But perhaps now, you could have duplicate entry. Let me know. Spec URL: http://linuxelectronique.free.fr/download/fedora/5/SPECS/pikloops.spec SRPM URL: http://linuxelectronique.free.fr/download/fedora/5/SRPMS/pikloops-0.2.1-5.src.rpm %changelog * Thu Sep 28 2006 Alain Portal 0.2.1-5 - Update %%{SOURCE1} to add Application category -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 29 14:06:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 10:06:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207607] Review Request: telepathy-butterfly - MSN connection manager for Telepathy In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609291406.k8TE6J2f017730@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: telepathy-butterfly - MSN connection manager for Telepathy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207607 ------- Additional Comments From sander at hoentjen.eu 2006-09-29 10:05 EST ------- ok, once you do that the filesystem package is APPROVED I will give a review on butterfly soon -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 29 14:16:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 10:16:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208250] Review Request: piklab - Development environment for applications based on PIC and dsPIC microcontrollers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609291416.k8TEGnS0018835@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: piklab - Development environment for applications based on PIC and dsPIC microcontrollers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208250 ------- Additional Comments From aportal at univ-montp2.fr 2006-09-29 10:16 EST ------- Spec URL: http://linuxelectronique.free.fr/download/fedora/5/SPECS/piklab.spec SRPM URL: http://linuxelectronique.free.fr/download/fedora/5/SRPMS/piklab-0.11.3-4.src.rpm %changelog * Wed Sep 29 2006 Alain Portal 0.11.3-4 - Fix typo for installing pickit2.perms - Add Application category in desktop file - Fix symlink: english is the only language where common directory is in LANG directory while for other, common is in LANG/docs directory -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 29 14:41:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 10:41:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201006] Review Request: HelixPlayer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609291441.k8TEfBm1020839@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: HelixPlayer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201006 gauret at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From gauret at free.fr 2006-09-29 10:40 EST ------- Imported and built, thanks a lot ! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 29 14:43:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 10:43:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208584] New: Review Request: mirrormagic - Puzzle game where you steer a beam of light using mirrors Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208584 Summary: Review Request: mirrormagic - Puzzle game where you steer a beam of light using mirrors Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/mirrormagic.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/mirrormagic-2.0.2-1.fc6.src.rpm Description: MirrorMagic is a game where you shoot around obstacles to collect energy using your beam. It is similar to "Mindbender" (Amiga) from the same author. The goal is to work out how to get around obstacles to shoot energy containers with your beam, thereby opening the path to the next level. Included are many levels familiar from the games "Deflektor" and "Mindbender". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 29 14:46:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 10:46:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208254] Review Request: pikloops - Code generator for PIC delays In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609291446.k8TEk7g3021392@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pikloops - Code generator for PIC delays https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208254 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-09-29 10:46 EST ------- (In reply to comment #16) > (In reply to comment #14) > But perhaps now, you could have duplicate entry. Let me know. The result is: only one entry is shown, no duplicate. I will check if the other things to be fixed is left. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 29 16:07:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 12:07:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208254] Review Request: pikloops - Code generator for PIC delays In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609291607.k8TG707S029402@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pikloops - Code generator for PIC delays https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208254 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-09-29 12:06 EST ------- Well, accroding to http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets : desktop file does not have mimetype key, so calling update-desktop-database is not necessary. Other things are okay. ------------------------------------------------ This package (pikloops) is APPROVED by me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 29 16:21:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 12:21:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208250] Review Request: piklab - Development environment for applications based on PIC and dsPIC microcontrollers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609291621.k8TGL15h030884@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: piklab - Development environment for applications based on PIC and dsPIC microcontrollers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208250 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-09-29 12:20 EST ------- Well, /etc/security/console.perms.d/pickit2.perms says: ------------------------------------------------------------- =/dev/pickit2* 0600 0600 roo ------------------------------------------------------------- Perhaps the last word must be "root". Just fix it. ------------------------------------------------------------------ This package (piklab) is APPROVED by me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 29 16:23:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 12:23:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208254] Review Request: pikloops - Code generator for PIC delays In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609291623.k8TGNxNU031287@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pikloops - Code generator for PIC delays https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208254 ------- Additional Comments From aportal at univ-montp2.fr 2006-09-29 12:23 EST ------- OK, thanks for the review! %changelog * Fri Sep 29 2006 Alain Portal 0.2.1-6 - Remove useless update-desktop-database -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 29 16:29:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 12:29:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208250] Review Request: piklab - Development environment for applications based on PIC and dsPIC microcontrollers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609291629.k8TGTCYY031721@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: piklab - Development environment for applications based on PIC and dsPIC microcontrollers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208250 ------- Additional Comments From aportal at univ-montp2.fr 2006-09-29 12:28 EST ------- OK, really thanks for the review! %changelog * Fri Sep 29 2006 Alain Portal 0.11.3-5 - Fix typo in pickit2.perms -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 29 16:54:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 12:54:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196379] Review Request: kdeartwork-extras: Artwork Extras, including xscreensaver-based screensavers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609291654.k8TGs0PS002237@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdeartwork-extras: Artwork Extras, including xscreensaver-based screensavers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196379 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-09-29 12:53 EST ------- Is this targeted for FC6 or FC7? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 29 16:56:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 12:56:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196379] Review Request: kdeartwork-extras: Artwork Extras, including xscreensaver-based screensavers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609291656.k8TGuWXZ002548@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdeartwork-extras: Artwork Extras, including xscreensaver-based screensavers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196379 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-09-29 12:56 EST ------- fc6 (and newer) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 29 17:09:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 13:09:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196379] Review Request: kdeartwork-extras: Artwork Extras, including xscreensaver-based screensavers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609291709.k8TH9VjS003864@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdeartwork-extras: Artwork Extras, including xscreensaver-based screensavers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196379 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-09-29 13:09 EST ------- Then, where is the newest SPEC file and SRPM? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 29 17:10:29 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 13:10:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208436] Review Request: kphotobymail - Kphotobymail is a PyQT based application for uploading photos to flickr account. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609291710.k8THATZT003915@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kphotobymail - Kphotobymail is a PyQT based application for uploading photos to flickr account. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208436 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tcallawa at redhat.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2006-09-29 13:10 EST ------- A few things need to be fixed here: You need to add: BuildRequires: desktop-file-utils Upstream source does not match source in SRPM, you need to reconcile that: ecfa19fa8618da1314b3964f3d4b39c731e3d1ee kphotobymail-0.3.2.tar.gz.UPSTREAM 70cf51f8641f315b0b6f738c0740a351fe5eb912 kphotobymail-0.3.2.tar.gz Don't use the name of the program in the summary. A recommended change: Summary: A PyQT based application for uploading photos to flickr Also, while not mandatory, I highly recommend that you append %{?dist} to the end of the Release string. See http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/DistTag Good: - rpmlint checks return: W: kphotobymail conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/kphotobymail.data Should be safe to ignore. E: kphotobymail non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/Kphotobymail/__init__.py 0644 Should be safe to ignore. W: kphotobymail mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 14, tab: line 4) Just fix line 14 to use tabs instead of spaces. - package meets naming guidelines - license (GPL) OK, text in %doc, matches source - spec file legible, in am. english - package compiles on devel (x86) - no missing BR - no unnecessary BR - no locales - not relocatable - owns all directories that it creates - no duplicate files - permissions ok - %clean ok - macro use consistent - code, not content - no need for -docs - nothing in %doc affects runtime - desktop file ok Bad: - source does NOT match upstream Fix the blockers and I'll revisit this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 29 17:15:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 13:15:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199108] Review Request: gutenprint: Printer Drivers Package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609291715.k8THFgrA004337@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gutenprint: Printer Drivers Package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199108 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-09-29 13:15 EST ------- one issue: - #rm -rf %{buildroot} in clean? That shouldn't be commented... perhaps it was while you were testing something? Fix that before you import it? I think all the issues I can see are solved, so this package is APPROVED. Don't forget to close this NEXTRELASE when you have imported and built it. Thanks for your patience with this long process. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 29 17:15:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 13:15:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196379] Review Request: kdeartwork-extras: Artwork Extras, including xscreensaver-based screensavers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609291715.k8THFiPK004349@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdeartwork-extras: Artwork Extras, including xscreensaver-based screensavers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196379 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-09-29 13:15 EST ------- Spec URL: http://kde-redhat.unl.edu/apt/kde-redhat/SPECS/kdeartwork-extras.spec SRPM URL: http://kde-redhat.unl.edu/apt/kde-redhat/all/SRPMS.stable/kdeartwork-extras-3.5.4-2.src %changelog * Tue Aug 29 2006 Rex Dieter 3.5.4-2 - used unversioned Requires: kdebase * Tue Jul 25 2006 Rex Dieter 3.5.4-1 - kde-3.5.4 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 29 17:22:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 13:22:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188974] Review Request: mesa-libGLw - Xt / Motif OpenGL widgets In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609291722.k8THMXl1005117@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mesa-libGLw - Xt / Motif OpenGL widgets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188974 ajackson at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From ajackson at redhat.com 2006-09-29 13:22 EST ------- Imported with Patrice's changes, thanks all! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 29 17:26:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 13:26:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208613] New: Review Request: libgcj - separate libgcj srpm Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208613 Summary: Review Request: libgcj - separate libgcj srpm Product: Fedora Core Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: jkeating at redhat.com ReportedBy: tromey at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/~tromey/libgcj-srpm/libgcj41.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/~tromey/libgcj-srpm/libgcj-4.1.1-20.src.rpm Description: This is a separate source RPM for libgcj. The idea is to allow pushing libgcj updates separately from GCC updates, enabling faster bug fix turnaround. There's a separate patch for the GCC spec file. I've sent a version of it to Jakub, but it needs an update. This patch reduces the build requirements of GCC; for instance we no longer need gtk to build the GCC rpms. There is a helper script in the libgcj SRPM to create the initial source tar from the gcc srpm. I think maintenance-wise the best approach is to start with the current gcc sources and then apply libgcj patchese as needed. Rebasing to a new gcc is simply and automated with the script. With my patch the gcc spec file still builds libgcj. This lets us continue to run 'make check' to verify that compiler changes don't break the libgcj build. However, the libgcj built here has reduced functionality (e.g., no AWT peers -- this is why we can remove build requirements) and is not packaged. With this change, fastjar and grepjar move from the libgcj RPM into the gcc RPM. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 29 17:29:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 13:29:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208254] Review Request: pikloops - Code generator for PIC delays In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609291729.k8THTqvI005883@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pikloops - Code generator for PIC delays https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208254 aportal at univ-montp2.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 29 17:33:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 13:33:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208613] Review Request: libgcj - separate libgcj srpm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609291733.k8THXmGB006264@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgcj - separate libgcj srpm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208613 jkeating at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|jkeating at redhat.com |nobody at fedoraproject.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 29 17:45:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 13:45:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208436] Review Request: kphotobymail - Kphotobymail is a PyQT based application for uploading photos to flickr account. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609291745.k8THjNX0007408@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kphotobymail - Kphotobymail is a PyQT based application for uploading photos to flickr account. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208436 ------- Additional Comments From kushaldas at gmail.com 2006-09-29 13:45 EST ------- Fixed.. :) Spec URL: http://freeshell.in/~kushal/kphotobymail.spec SRPM URL: http://freeshell.in/~kushal/kphotobymail-0.3.2-3.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 29 17:49:39 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 13:49:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208436] Review Request: kphotobymail - Kphotobymail is a PyQT based application for uploading photos to flickr account. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609291749.k8THndbR007793@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kphotobymail - Kphotobymail is a PyQT based application for uploading photos to flickr account. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208436 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2006-09-29 13:49 EST ------- Looks good. Only remaining issue I see is that you're using spaces instead of tabs in your desktop-file-install call (line 34). rpmlint complained about it, so, just fix it before you commit. APPROVED and SPONSORED. Do your paperwork, when I see it come across, I'll sponsor you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 29 17:49:48 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 13:49:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193106] Review Request: gtkmozembedmm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609291749.k8THnmWN007804@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtkmozembedmm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193106 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-09-29 13:49 EST ------- Any ideas on the failure from comment #11? I can provide access to a x86_64 test machine if you would like... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 29 17:51:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 13:51:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197732] Review Request: optipng - a PNG optimizer and converter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609291751.k8THpJhF007966@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: optipng - a PNG optimizer and converter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197732 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-09-29 13:51 EST ------- Ping Till. Do you still want to submit this package? Any idea when you might address the items from comments #10 and #11? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 29 17:53:47 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 13:53:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208613] Review Request: libgcj - separate libgcj srpm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609291753.k8THrl8P008268@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgcj - separate libgcj srpm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208613 ------- Additional Comments From notting at redhat.com 2006-09-29 13:53 EST ------- I presume this is targeted at FC-7? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 29 17:54:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 13:54:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208250] Review Request: piklab - Development environment for applications based on PIC and dsPIC microcontrollers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609291754.k8THs1bs008329@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: piklab - Development environment for applications based on PIC and dsPIC microcontrollers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208250 aportal at univ-montp2.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 29 18:05:37 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 14:05:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207173] Review Request: pymsn - Python libraries for MSN Messenger network In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609291805.k8TI5bY2009269@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pymsn - Python libraries for MSN Messenger network https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207173 bdpepple at ameritech.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 29 18:06:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 14:06:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208436] Review Request: kphotobymail - Kphotobymail is a PyQT based application for uploading photos to flickr account. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609291806.k8TI61QC009334@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kphotobymail - Kphotobymail is a PyQT based application for uploading photos to flickr account. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208436 ------- Additional Comments From kushaldas at gmail.com 2006-09-29 14:05 EST ------- Done. Spec URL: http://freeshell.in/~kushal/kphotobymail.spec SRPM URL: http://freeshell.in/~kushal/kphotobymail-0.3.2-4.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 29 18:05:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 14:05:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207607] Review Request: telepathy-butterfly - MSN connection manager for Telepathy In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609291805.k8TI5xf9009301@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: telepathy-butterfly - MSN connection manager for Telepathy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207607 Bug 207607 depends on bug 207173, which changed state. Bug 207173 Summary: Review Request: pymsn - Python libraries for MSN Messenger network https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207173 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 29 18:15:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 14:15:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187706] Review Request: alsa-oss - Userspace OSS emulation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609291815.k8TIFjXY009863@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: alsa-oss - Userspace OSS emulation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187706 jima at beer.tclug.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jima at beer.tclug.org ------- Additional Comments From jima at beer.tclug.org 2006-09-29 14:15 EST ------- Just passing on a suggestion Thorsten mentioned to me on IRC when I inquired about alsa-oss; he said that the version of alsa-oss should probably be in sync with the version of alsa-lib in Core. For fc6, that's currently 1.0.12; for fc5, it's 1.0.11rc2. I'm not positive there are major potential implications if they're not aligned (nor is he, I don't think), but it seems like a logical enough idea. I'd really like to see this make it into Extras, personally. My father-in-law nagged me about the package enough so that I rolled my own (basically just an update of the one from fc1) before Kevin [Fenzi] pointed me toward this open review. Hack job or not, it resolved his Flash issue, and I suspect it'll make other people similarly happy. :-) Thanks! *patiently waits for the next iteration of the package* -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 29 18:32:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 14:32:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197732] Review Request: optipng - a PNG optimizer and converter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609291832.k8TIWKk7011265@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: optipng - a PNG optimizer and converter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197732 ------- Additional Comments From opensource at till.name 2006-09-29 14:32 EST ------- I tend to forget to finally submit my comments here, everything is done already except that I did not send my comment here. SPEC: http://www-users.kawo2.rwth-aachen.de/~tmaas/fedora/optipng.spec SRPM: http://www-users.kawo2.rwth-aachen.de/~tmaas/fedora/repo/optipng-0.5.4-1.src.rpm Sorry for the delay. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 29 18:32:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 14:32:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208584] Review Request: mirrormagic - Puzzle game where you steer a beam of light using mirrors In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609291832.k8TIWu0e011381@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mirrormagic - Puzzle game where you steer a beam of light using mirrors https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208584 mr.ecik at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mr.ecik at gmail.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mr.ecik at gmail.com 2006-09-29 14:32 EST ------- MUST items: * rpmlint doesn't show anything * package is named well * spec file name is good * package meets Packaging Guidelines * package is licensed with an GPL open-source compatible license * License field in spec file matches actual license * license file is included in %doc * md5sums are matching (32fd3909c1e27f493d89bc2276da6744) * package successfully compiles on x86_64 * BuildRequires listed well * no locales * proper %post and %postun sections * not relocatable * package owns directories well * no duplicates in %files * every %files section includes %defattr * proper %clean section * macros used well * .desktop file looks good THINGS to do: * this is not the blocker, but probably SDL-devel BR is unnecessary (I haven't tested it) * the much more important problem is related with running the game on x86_64. When I'm trying to do it, I get following message: $ mirrormagic mirrormagic: gadget incomplete (missing Bitmap) mirrormagic: aborting $ mirrormagic -v mirrormagic: warning: cannot open configuration file '/home/ecik/.mirrormagic/ setup.conf' mirrormagic: warning: using default setup values mirrormagic: warning: cannot open configuration file '/home/ecik/.mirrormagic/ levelsetup.conf' mirrormagic: warning: using default setup values mirrormagic: warning: cannot open configuration file '/home/ecik/.mirrormagic/ levelsetup/classic_deflektor/levelsetup.conf' mirrormagic: warning: using default setup values mirrormagic: gadget incomplete (missing Bitmap) mirrormagic: aborting -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 29 18:34:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 14:34:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208208] Review Request: MegaMek - a portable, network-enabled BattleTech engine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609291834.k8TIYRIL011520@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: MegaMek - a portable, network-enabled BattleTech engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208208 ------- Additional Comments From overholt at redhat.com 2006-09-29 14:34 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > (In reply to comment #2) > > Created an attachment (id=137352) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=137352&action=view) [edit] [edit] > > screenshot just after startup > > > > The back window draws and then the front window appears to take over. If I > > switch windows and then switch back, nothing is re-drawn. > > Can you paste the contents of /usr/lib/security/classpath.security here? $ cat /usr/lib/security/classpath.security security.provider.1=gnu.java.security.provider.Gnu security.provider.2=gnu.javax.crypto.jce.GnuCrypto security.provider.3=gnu.javax.crypto.jce.GnuSasl security.provider.4=gnu.javax.net.ssl.provider.Jessie security.provider.5=gnu.javax.security.auth.callback.GnuCallbacks security.provider.6=org.bouncycastle.jce.provider.BouncyCastleProvider security.provider.7=org.metastatic.jessie.provider.Jessie security.provider.8=gnu.crypto.jce.GnuCrypto -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 29 18:45:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 14:45:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206989] Review Request: twinkle - A SIP Soft Phone In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609291845.k8TIjjif012384@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: twinkle - A SIP Soft Phone https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206989 jima at beer.tclug.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jima at beer.tclug.org OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jima at beer.tclug.org 2006-09-29 14:45 EST ------- Parag: Strictly speaking, you're a vetted contributor, and Kevin certainly is, so you *can* do official reviews. If you're afraid of screwing something up, so be it; I'm continually expecting to make glaring mistakes and get flamed for it, but that won't stop me from reviewing. :-) Since I don't do enough reviews (and readily acknowledge this), I think I'll take this one on. Looks like something that would certainly benefit Fedora. Starting the review...well, as soon as my devel branch rsync finishes (I *swear* I just synched it). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 29 18:54:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 14:54:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196379] Review Request: kdeartwork-extras: Artwork Extras, including xscreensaver-based screensavers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609291854.k8TIsMtw013061@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdeartwork-extras: Artwork Extras, including xscreensaver-based screensavers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196379 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-09-29 14:54 EST ------- I will review this later. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 29 19:36:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 15:36:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208208] Review Request: MegaMek - a portable, network-enabled BattleTech engine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609291936.k8TJa0AZ017348@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: MegaMek - a portable, network-enabled BattleTech engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208208 ------- Additional Comments From fitzsim at redhat.com 2006-09-29 15:35 EST ------- OK, add this line to classpath.security: securerandom.source=file:/dev/random and re-run. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 29 19:42:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 15:42:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 195365] Review Request: etcnet - /etc/net network configuration system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609291942.k8TJggqB018345@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: etcnet - /etc/net network configuration system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195365 Bug 195365 depends on bug 205932, which changed state. Bug 205932 Summary: hardcoded net-scripts dependency https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205932 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |WONTFIX Status|NEW |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 29 19:48:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 15:48:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208636] New: Review Request: perl-PPI-Tester - A wxPerl-based interactive PPI debugger/tester Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208636 Summary: Review Request: perl-PPI-Tester - A wxPerl-based interactive PPI debugger/tester Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jpo at di.uminho.pt QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: ftp://perl.di.uminho.pt/pub/fedora/perl-PPI-Tester.spec SRPM URL: ftp://perl.di.uminho.pt/pub/fedora/perl-PPI-Tester-0.06-1.src.rpm Description: This package implements a wxWindows desktop application which provides the ability to interactively test the PPI perl parser. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 29 19:49:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 15:49:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208636] Review Request: perl-PPI-Tester - A wxPerl-based interactive PPI debugger/tester In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609291949.k8TJno5e019020@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-PPI-Tester - A wxPerl-based interactive PPI debugger/tester https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208636 jpo at di.uminho.pt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |208009 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 29 19:50:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 15:50:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208009] Review Request: perl-Wx - Interface to the wxWidgets cross-platform GUI toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609291950.k8TJo0vo019034@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Wx - Interface to the wxWidgets cross-platform GUI toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208009 jpo at di.uminho.pt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |208636 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 29 19:58:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 15:58:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208613] Review Request: libgcj - separate libgcj srpm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609291958.k8TJwL64019652@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgcj - separate libgcj srpm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208613 ------- Additional Comments From fitzsim at redhat.com 2006-09-29 15:58 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > I presume this is targeted at FC-7? No, Jesse wanted this for FC-6. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 29 20:05:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 16:05:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208613] Review Request: libgcj - separate libgcj srpm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609292005.k8TK5ivr020222@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgcj - separate libgcj srpm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208613 ------- Additional Comments From notting at redhat.com 2006-09-29 16:05 EST ------- Huh? It seems way late in the game for this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 29 20:14:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 16:14:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198816] Review Request: gfs-utils - global file system userland utilities In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609292014.k8TKEO1a020740@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gfs-utils - global file system userland utilities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198816 ------- Additional Comments From cfeist at redhat.com 2006-09-29 16:14 EST ------- Jason, Yes I do need sponsorship for this package. Can you sponsor me? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 29 20:20:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 16:20:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201077] gfs-kmod In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609292020.k8TKKJ1k021147@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: gfs-kmod https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201077 ------- Additional Comments From cfeist at redhat.com 2006-09-29 16:20 EST ------- I've fixed the comments so it provides a version number. The documentation is provided in the user level package (which is why there are no docs). Also, the package name follows the kernel package name guidlines (which is why it is not capitalized). New packages here: http://people.redhat.com/cfeist/gfs-kmod.spec http://people.redhat.com/cfeist/gfs-kmod-0.1.0-4.2.6.18_1.2708.fc6.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 29 20:28:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 16:28:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206989] Review Request: twinkle - A SIP Soft Phone In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609292028.k8TKSoqC021604@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: twinkle - A SIP Soft Phone https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206989 jima at beer.tclug.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jima at beer.tclug.org 2006-09-29 16:28 EST ------- Using my own review checklist: http://beer.tclug.org/fedora-extras/review-checklist-1.1.txt 1. No rpmlint output from the main or source RPM. However, from the debuginfo, I got: W: twinkle-debuginfo hidden-file-or-dir /usr/src/debug/twinkle-0.8.1/src/gui/.moc W: twinkle-debuginfo hidden-file-or-dir /usr/src/debug/twinkle-0.8.1/src/gui/.moc W: twinkle-debuginfo hidden-file-or-dir /usr/src/debug/twinkle-0.8.1/src/gui/.ui W: twinkle-debuginfo hidden-file-or-dir /usr/src/debug/twinkle-0.8.1/src/gui/.ui I have no idea how important that is. 2. Package seems to adhere to the Package Naming Guidelines. 3. Spec is %{name}.spec 4. Package appears to meet the Packaging Guidelines. 5. Package is GPL... 6. ...and the spec agrees. 7. COPYING included in %doc 8. Spec is in American English. 9. Spec is legible. 10. Tarball MD5 matches upstream (245ffd3b4a6f968d8f80d42f6aad079c). 11. Packages build on FC5/i386, FC5/ppc, and FC6/i386. 12. n/a, unless it fails to build on x86_64. 13. Package built in Plague, so if there are any missing BRs, they're non-fatal (and might silently corrupt this package!) 14. Package makes no effort to handle locales. Oh well. 15. n/a, no shared libraries. 16. Package is not designed to be relocatable. Are any? 17. Package owns all directories it creates (aside from those owned by filesystem). 18. No duplicate files. 19. Permissions look sane, and there's a %defattr entry. 20. Spec has a valid %clean section. 21. Macro use consistent. 22. Package contains code and (I believe) permissable content. 23. Documentation is minimal enough... 24. ...and shouldn't affect runtime. 25. n/a, no header files or static libraries. 26. n/a, no .pc files. 27. n/a, no library files. 28. n/a, no -devel subpackage. 29. n/a, no .la files. 30. Desktop file appears to get installed in the prescribed manner. 31. Nothing else owns anything with the name "twinkle," so I think we're safe. 32. Release tag contains %{?dist}, unsurprisingly. 33. n/a, already contains COPYING. 34. n/a, translations probably not available. 35. Package builds in Plague/Mock. 36. I can't verify x86_64, but it builds fine on i386 and ppc. Kevin said it built under x86_64, though, so we should be good there. 37. Works beautifully under i386. (I don't have any other test environments.) 38. n/a, no scriptlets. 39. n/a, no subpackages. Sorry this review took as long as it did; I actually wanted to test the application to see how well it would work for my own use. It communicated just fine with another (closed-source) SIP softphone. Unless the rpmlint/debuginfo warnings are of particular concern (anyone?), I think we can probably call twinkle APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 29 22:01:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 18:01:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198816] Review Request: gfs-utils - global file system userland utilities In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609292201.k8TM1chk029393@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gfs-utils - global file system userland utilities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198816 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tibbs at math.uh.edu OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-09-29 18:01 EST ------- I can, but would need to look over this and your other submissions first. I hope to have some time to spend on extras reviews over the next couple of days. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 29 23:12:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 19:12:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191743] Review Request: sysprof - a sampling CPU profiler In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609292312.k8TNCk34032497@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sysprof - a sampling CPU profiler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191743 giallu at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From giallu at gmail.com 2006-09-29 19:12 EST ------- New package addressing comment #1 (and comment #8...) http://giallu.homelinux.org/fedora/sysprof.spec http://giallu.homelinux.org/fedora/sysprof-1.0.3-2.src.rpm Please note I have been sponsored, so now it only need an official review from another regular contributor to have this piece of software in Fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 30 00:43:05 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 20:43:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208208] Review Request: MegaMek - a portable, network-enabled BattleTech engine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609300043.k8U0h5uo002910@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: MegaMek - a portable, network-enabled BattleTech engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208208 ------- Additional Comments From overholt at redhat.com 2006-09-29 20:42 EST ------- (In reply to comment #7) > OK, add this line to classpath.security: > > securerandom.source=file:/dev/random > > and re-run. Same deal. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 30 01:04:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 21:04:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207806] Review Request: evolution-bogofilter - A plugin for bogofilter support in evolution In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609300104.k8U14jhE003605@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: evolution-bogofilter - A plugin for bogofilter support in evolution https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207806 ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2006-09-29 21:04 EST ------- All the issues above fixed. New SRPM: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/evolution-bogofilter-0.2.0-3.fc6.src.rpm New SPEC: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/evolution-bogofilter.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 30 01:54:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 21:54:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207763] Review Request: ddd - GUI for several command-line debuggers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609300154.k8U1sR5l005152@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ddd - GUI for several command-line debuggers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207763 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2006-09-29 21:54 EST ------- Built, thanks for the reviewing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 30 02:50:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 22:50:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208675] New: Review Request: miau - Full-featured IRC bouncer Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208675 Summary: Review Request: miau - Full-featured IRC bouncer Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jima at beer.tclug.org QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://beer.tclug.org/fedora-extras/miau/miau.spec SRPM URL: http://beer.tclug.org/fedora-extras/miau/miau-0.6.2-2.src.rpm Description: miau is a smart and versatile IRC-bouncing tool for *NIX. The difference between miau and other bouncers is that miau will go on IRC as soon as it is launched, guarding or attempting to get your nick. Control over the session can be taken as with other bouncers, by simply connecting to miau (and providing a password) like you would connect to a normal IRC server. On disconnect, miau is able to stay in the channels and to reintroduce them to your client on your next connect. Other handy features are message logging, flood protection, and DCC bouncing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 30 03:35:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 23:35:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199108] Review Request: gutenprint: Printer Drivers Package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609300335.k8U3ZvLk010560@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gutenprint: Printer Drivers Package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199108 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-09-29 23:35 EST ------- Kevin, Thnaks very much for your time and sponsoring this package. I have imported package. Do I need to build it on build server? If yes how can i do that? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 30 03:44:40 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 23:44:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199108] Review Request: gutenprint: Printer Drivers Package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609300344.k8U3ieQc011289@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gutenprint: Printer Drivers Package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199108 ------- Additional Comments From peter at thecodergeek.com 2006-09-29 23:44 EST ------- Parag: You'll need to setup your install the client-side tools and whatnot for the build system, the import the package and tag then enqueue a build for it. For more information please see: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/Contributors#head-0956b12959af46cfe0aa12d09ed15e573bfd9ef4 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 30 03:51:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 23:51:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199108] Review Request: gutenprint: Printer Drivers Package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609300351.k8U3p890011798@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gutenprint: Printer Drivers Package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199108 ------- Additional Comments From peter at thecodergeek.com 2006-09-29 23:51 EST ------- (In reply to comment #81) > Parag: You'll need to setup your install the client-side tools [...] That should read "...need to install and setup the client-side tools..." Apologies for any confusion. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 30 04:20:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 00:20:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205075] Review Request: fwbackups - a user backup program, with support for automated backups and on-demand backups In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609300420.k8U4KOlq012898@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fwbackups - a user backup program, with support for automated backups and on-demand backups https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205075 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-09-30 00:20 EST ------- Sorry for taking so long to respond; work intruded a bit into my evenings. Firstly, the Source0: URL is not valud; it looks like you need to downcase "FWBackups". However, after doing this I find that again the files are not the same. What's in the srpm needs to match precisely what is downloaded from the web site. Also, for your sanity I recommend something like: Source0: http://www.diffingo.com/downloads/fwbackups/fwbackups-%{version}.tar.gz so that you only have the update the version in one place when you update the package. Aside from that, you should clean up the commented lines in %install (and the commented Provides as well). And I wonder what you have your tabs set for, since the indentation is all over the place on my screen. The package installs fine and seems to work for me on FC5. (I did not test actually running a backup.) So really it's down to the tarball actually matching what's at the upstream web site, and a few minor specfile adjustments. Review: X source files match upstream. * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. X specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently (needs minor cleanups). * dist tag is present. * build root is correct. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. License text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development & FC5, x86_64 & i386). * package installs properly * package runs OK. (I only did some basic tests and didn't actually run a backup.) * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: config(fwbackups) = 1.42.1-1.fc6 fwbackups = 1.42.1-1.fc6 = /bin/bash /usr/bin/python config(fwbackups) = 1.42.1-1.fc6 pygtk2 pygtk2-libglade python(abi) = 2.4 redhat-artwork * %check is not present; no test suite upstream. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * GUI app; .desktop files are supplied and installed properly. No mimetype keys, so no need to run update-mime-database. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 30 04:27:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 00:27:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199108] Review Request: gutenprint: Printer Drivers Package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609300427.k8U4Rx3R013079@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gutenprint: Printer Drivers Package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199108 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-09-30 00:27 EST ------- I got some issues in package build i gave following command plague-client build gutenprint gutenprint-5.0.0-0.14.fc6 fc6 Got results as Error: could not check out gutenprint-5.0.0-0.14.fc6 from fedora-development-extras - output was: cvs checkout: warning: cannot open /cvs/extras/CVSROOT/val-tags read/write: Permission denied cvs [checkout aborted]: no such tag gutenprint-5.0.0-0.14.fc6 What i missed? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 30 04:51:36 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 00:51:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208678] New: Review Request: SimGear - Simulation library components Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208678 Summary: Review Request: SimGear - Simulation library components Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: tcallawa at redhat.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/SimGear.spec SRPM URL: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/SimGear-0.3.10-1.fc6.src.rpm Description: SimGear is a set of open-source libraries designed to be used as building blocks for quickly assembling 3d simulations, games, and visualization applications. This library is used in several open source simulation games, most notably, vamos and flightgear. Accordingly, this is a pre-requisite for those games to be packaged in Fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 30 04:55:24 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 00:55:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208679] New: Review Request: vamos - Automotive simulation framework Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208679 Summary: Review Request: vamos - Automotive simulation framework Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: tcallawa at redhat.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/vamos.spec SRPM URL: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/vamos-0.5.5-1.fc6.src.rpm Description: Vamos is an automotive simulation framework with an emphasis on thorough physical modeling and good C++ design. Vamos includes a real-time, first-person, 3D driving application. It also includes caelum, which is a program to help make seamless sky boxes from panoramic photos. The image file is mapped onto a sphere and six views are shown. The views are from the center of the sphere looking up (top row), down (bottom row), front, right, back, and left (middle row). When these images are mapped to the faces of a cube and viewed from the center of the cube, the view in any direction is indistinguishable from the view from the center of the sphere. The images for the sky box are extracted by taking a screenshot. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 30 04:56:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 00:56:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208679] Review Request: vamos - Automotive simulation framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609300456.k8U4u7D6013958@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vamos - Automotive simulation framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208679 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |208678 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 30 04:56:18 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 00:56:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208678] Review Request: SimGear - Simulation library components In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609300456.k8U4uITC013974@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: SimGear - Simulation library components https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208678 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |208679 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 30 04:56:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 00:56:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208436] Review Request: kphotobymail - Kphotobymail is a PyQT based application for uploading photos to flickr account. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609300456.k8U4uSsg013984@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kphotobymail - Kphotobymail is a PyQT based application for uploading photos to flickr account. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208436 kushaldas at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 30 05:00:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 01:00:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201077] gfs-kmod In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609300500.k8U50r31014105@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: gfs-kmod https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201077 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-09-30 01:00 EST ------- I mockbuild this package on FC6 devel. It got built successfully. rpmlint is NOT silent I: kmod-gfs checking W: kmod-gfs summary-not-capitalized gfs kernel module(s) Summary doesn't begin with a capital letter. =>This is well known rpmlint Warning. Forget it. W: kmod-gfs no-version-in-last-changelog The last changelog entry doesn't contain a version. Please insert the version that is coherent with the version of the package and rebuild it. => You miss to add changelong entry W: kmod-gfs unstripped-binary-or-object /lib/modules/2.6.18-1.2699.fc6/extra/gfs/gfs.ko =>This is well known rpmlint Warning. Forget it. W: kmod-gfs no-documentation The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include documentation files. =>Not harmfull. Everything looks OK. Update Chnagelog and give new package locations. If nobody is willing to Sponsor this package I can do a Full Review and APPROVE package provided FESCO is not having any problem to allow this kmod in FE. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 30 05:09:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 01:09:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201077] gfs-kmod In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609300509.k8U59qBo014289@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: gfs-kmod https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201077 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-09-30 01:09 EST ------- SRPM is also NOT rpmlint Silent W: gfs-kmod strange-permission kmodtool 0755 A file that you listed to include in your package has strange permissions. Usually, a file should have 0644 permissions. => This is well known rpmlint Warning on kmod packages. Forget it. E: gfs-kmod invalid-spec-name gfs-kernel.spec Your spec filename must end with '.spec'. If it's not the case, rename your file and rebuild your package. => You Need to change SPEC file name from gfs-kernel.spec to gfs-kmod.spec W: gfs-kmod mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 35, tab: line 45) The specfile mixes use of spaces and tabs for indentation, which is a cosmetic annoyance. Use either spaces or tabs for indentation, not both. => USE sed -i -e 's|\t| |g' gfs-kernel.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 30 05:17:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 01:17:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208680] New: Review Request: ser2net - Proxy that allows tcp connections to serial ports Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208680 Summary: Review Request: ser2net - Proxy that allows tcp connections to serial ports Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: tcallawa at redhat.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/ser2net.spec SRPM URL: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/ser2net-2.3-1.fc6.src.rpm Description: ser2net provides a way for a user to connect from a network connection to a serial port. It provides all the serial port setup, a configuration file to configure the ports, a control login for modifying port parameters, monitoring ports, and controlling ports. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 30 05:18:31 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 01:18:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191745] Review Request: sysprof-kmod - kernel module for the sysprof profiler In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609300518.k8U5IVtg014522@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sysprof-kmod - kernel module for the sysprof profiler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191745 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |panemade at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-09-30 01:18 EST ------- Will Do Full Review today -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 30 05:58:23 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 01:58:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206707] Review Request: acerhk-kmod - Acer Hotkey driver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609300558.k8U5wN7j015439@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: acerhk-kmod - Acer Hotkey driver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206707 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |panemade at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-09-30 01:58 EST ------- It looks to me that this package is not building on i386 FC6 and hanging in setup precedure of mock build. Can you mock build your package and give its results here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 30 06:11:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 02:11:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191745] Review Request: sysprof-kmod - kernel module for the sysprof profiler In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609300611.k8U6B0df015720@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sysprof-kmod - kernel module for the sysprof profiler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191745 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |panemade at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-09-30 02:10 EST ------- I think kernels above 2.6.16 do not require any smp kernels so either SPEC need to have some kversion checking or remove smp build lines. Here is Review for your package which i built for 2.6.18 which do not have smp support so i remove those lines form SPEC Package Built successfully for i386 FC6 development Rpmlint on SRPM W: sysprof-kmod strange-permission kmodtool 0666 A file that you listed to include in your package has strange permissions. Usually, a file should have 0644 permissions. => This is well known rpmlint Warning on kmod packages. Forget it. E: sysprof-kmod configure-without-libdir-spec A configure script is run without specifying the libdir. configure options must be augmented with something like --libdir=%{_libdir}. I am not able to found any ./configure call in SPEC. Why this Error is coming Gianluca, any idea? Rpmlint on RPM W: kmod-sysprof summary-not-capitalized sysprof kernel module(s) Summary doesn't begin with a capital letter. => This is well known rpmlint Warning on kmod packages. Forget it. W: kmod-sysprof unstripped-binary-or-object /lib/modules/2.6.18-1.2699.fc6/extra/sysprof/sysprof-module.ko => This is well known rpmlint Warning on kmod packages. Forget it. W: kmod-sysprof no-documentation The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include documentation files. =>Ignore this Otherwise package looks ok. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 30 06:17:52 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 02:17:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191745] Review Request: sysprof-kmod - kernel module for the sysprof profiler In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609300617.k8U6Hqfa016049@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sysprof-kmod - kernel module for the sysprof profiler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191745 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-09-30 02:17 EST ------- I am not able to find sysprof-kmod-common package. When i tried to install sysprof-kmod, i got following output. error: Failed dependencies: sysprof-kmod-common = 1.0.3 is needed by kmod-sysprof-1.0.3-1.2.6.18_1.2699.fc6.i686 In this case i suggest you to modify kmodtool to remove dependency of sysprof-kmod-common for sysprof-kmod and also ask same on Fedora-extras mailing list. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 30 06:23:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 02:23:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191743] Review Request: sysprof - a sampling CPU profiler In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609300623.k8U6NhvR016192@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sysprof - a sampling CPU profiler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191743 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |panemade at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-09-30 02:23 EST ------- I suggest you to change SPEC name to sysprof-kmod-common.spec and resubmit package. This is according to kernel module packaging guidelines. Thoug its given that userlan package should Provides: %{name}- kmod-common = %{version} it will be good idea to have similar name given to SPEC also. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 30 06:27:32 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 02:27:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206839] Review Request: TurboKid - Python template plugin that supports Kid templates In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609300627.k8U6RWUk016275@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: TurboKid - Python template plugin that supports Kid templates https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206839 lmacken at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Component|Package Review |orpie OtherBugsDependingO|163779 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From lmacken at redhat.com 2006-09-30 02:27 EST ------- Imported into CVS, added to owners.list, requested FC-5 branch, and bumped to 0.9.9. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 30 06:38:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 02:38:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191743] Review Request: sysprof - a sampling CPU profiler In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609300638.k8U6cEA7016759@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sysprof - a sampling CPU profiler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191743 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-09-30 02:38 EST ------- Anyway i tried with latest uploaded SRPM link. Mock build is failed with error checking for cplus_demangle_opname in -liberty... no configure: error: libiberty is required to compile sysprof error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.63043 (%build) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 30 06:39:51 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 02:39:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206838] Review Request: TGFastData - Automatic user interface generation for TurboGears In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609300639.k8U6dpLp016852@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: TGFastData - Automatic user interface generation for TurboGears https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206838 lmacken at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|Package Review |orpie ------- Additional Comments From lmacken at redhat.com 2006-09-30 02:39 EST ------- http://people.redhat.com/lmacken/SPECS/python-tgfastdata.spec http://people.redhat.com/lmacken/RPMS/python-tgfastdata-0.9a6-2.src.rpm * Sat Sep 30 2006 Luke Macken - 0.9a6-2 - Rename to python-tgfastdata - Install egg-info -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 30 06:47:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 02:47:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206837] Review Request: TurboCheetah - TurboGears plugin to support use of Cheetah templates In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609300647.k8U6lvq9017042@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: TurboCheetah - TurboGears plugin to support use of Cheetah templates https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206837 lmacken at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|Package Review |orpie ------- Additional Comments From lmacken at redhat.com 2006-09-30 02:47 EST ------- http://people.redhat.com/lmacken/SPECS/python-turbocheetah.spec http://people.redhat.com/lmacken/RPMS/python-turbocheetah-0.9.5-2.src.rpm * Sat Sep 30 2006 Luke Macken - 0.9.5-2 - Rename to python-turbocheetah - Install egg-info - Add README -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 30 06:51:58 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 02:51:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200499] Review Request: In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609300651.k8U6pwUL017105@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200499 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-09-30 02:51 EST ------- If you are still willing to submit this package, upload new version of this package. I got following rpmlint output Review on this package => On SRPM i got W: btsco-kmod-common mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 2, tab: line 1) The specfile mixes use of spaces and tabs for indentation, which is a cosmetic annoyance. Use either spaces or tabs for indentation, not both. =>USE sed -i -e 's|\t| |g' on SPEC file on RPM i got W: btsco-kmod-common incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.42.fc5.2 0.42-2.fc6 The last entry in %changelog contains a version identifier that is not coherent with the epoch:version-release tuple of the package. => update Changelog entry E: btsco-kmod-common zero-length /usr/share/doc/btsco-kmod-common-0.42/NEWS E: btsco-kmod-common zero-length /usr/share/doc/btsco-kmod-common-0.42/ChangeLog E: btsco-kmod-common zero-length /usr/share/doc/btsco-kmod-common-0.42/AUTHORS =>Remove files in SPEC if they are zero-length files -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 30 06:57:12 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 02:57:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206836] Review Request: TurboJson - Python template plugin that supports json In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609300657.k8U6vCKU017343@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: TurboJson - Python template plugin that supports json https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206836 lmacken at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|Package Review |osgal ------- Additional Comments From lmacken at redhat.com 2006-09-30 02:57 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > - source files match do not upstream: You can no longer download 0.9.9, they're > released 1.0 beta. > - latest version is not being packaged (see above) 1.0b is the current TurboGears release; it looks like TurboJson is still at 0.9.9 as far as I can tell. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 30 07:09:59 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 03:09:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196379] Review Request: kdeartwork-extras: Artwork Extras, including xscreensaver-based screensavers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609300709.k8U79xMx017724@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdeartwork-extras: Artwork Extras, including xscreensaver-based screensavers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196379 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-09-30 03:09 EST ------- Well, 1. From http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines : * rpmlint is not silent. W: kdeartwork-extras macro-in-%changelog _libdir W: kdeartwork-extras macro-in-%changelog _libexecdir Use %% to avoild having macros expanded. * Requires: - Does this package (kdeartwork-extras) really require xscreensaver related packages? It is someting like "optional", isn't it? Perhaps there are some users who don't want to install xscreensaver-gl-extras. I also wonder why this package require xscreensaver-base. Perhaps KDE has its own screensaver mechanism isn't it? (I use GNOME and xscreensave as screensaver, so I don't know well about KDE). * BuildRequires: - Is xscreensaver-base really required? 2. From http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines : = Nothing. 3. Other things I have noticed: A. request: * Desktop files corresponding to the following hacks are missing - glschool (in xscreensaver-gl-extras) - topblock (in xscreensaver-gl-extras) Would you add the desktop files for these hacks? * IMO, the hacks in the following package can also be used for this package. rss-glx (in extras and maintained by Nils Philippsen) xdaliclock (in extras and maintained by Chris Ricker) Would you add the corresponding desktop files or ask the maintainers to support this package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 30 07:24:33 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 03:24:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196379] Review Request: kdeartwork-extras: Artwork Extras, including xscreensaver-based screensavers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609300724.k8U7OXEw018305@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdeartwork-extras: Artwork Extras, including xscreensaver-based screensavers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196379 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-09-30 03:24 EST ------- Another one question. Does "sourc"ing Qt config files (/etc/profile.d/qt.sh) still needed? At least mockbuild surely "source" all files under /etc/profile.d and explicit "sourc"ing qt.sh is unnecessary. I can see many packages which use qt for rebuilding and don't "source" qt.sh explicitly under: http://buildsys.fedoraproject.org/logs/fedora-development-extras/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 30 07:37:49 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 03:37:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202528] Review Request: rt2500-kmod In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609300737.k8U7bnbX019097@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rt2500-kmod https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202528 fedora at leemhuis.info changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |208686 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 30 07:38:01 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 03:38:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177583] Review Request: zaptel-kmod In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609300738.k8U7c1Pj019144@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: zaptel-kmod https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177583 fedora at leemhuis.info changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |208686 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 30 07:38:08 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 03:38:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197867] Review Request: iscsitarget (includes kernel module) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609300738.k8U7c820019194@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: iscsitarget (includes kernel module) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197867 fedora at leemhuis.info changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |208687 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 30 07:38:20 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 03:38:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191745] Review Request: sysprof-kmod - kernel module for the sysprof profiler In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609300738.k8U7cKoC019262@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sysprof-kmod - kernel module for the sysprof profiler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191745 fedora at leemhuis.info changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |208687 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 30 07:38:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 03:38:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200498] Review Request: btsco-kmod In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609300738.k8U7cUYL019307@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: btsco-kmod https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200498 fedora at leemhuis.info changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |208686 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 30 07:40:03 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 03:40:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190997] Review Request: linux-wlan-ng In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609300740.k8U7e31Y019471@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: linux-wlan-ng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190997 fedora at leemhuis.info changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |208686 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 30 07:40:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 03:40:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206707] Review Request: acerhk-kmod - Acer Hotkey driver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609300740.k8U7eEWp019495@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: acerhk-kmod - Acer Hotkey driver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206707 fedora at leemhuis.info changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |208686 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 30 07:41:22 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 03:41:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201077] gfs-kmod In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609300741.k8U7fMjf019593@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: gfs-kmod https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201077 fedora at leemhuis.info changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |208686 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 30 10:58:44 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 06:58:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191743] Review Request: sysprof - a sampling CPU profiler In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609301058.k8UAwi8t002240@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sysprof - a sampling CPU profiler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191743 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2006-09-30 06:58 EST ------- (In reply to comment #10) > I suggest you to change SPEC name to sysprof-kmod-common.spec and resubmit > package. This is according to kernel module packaging guidelines. Nope, see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/KernelModules#head-164fc2703b23579d258b39d675a92643669507e0 In this case such a rename would sound plain wrong to me. Provides: sysprof-kmod-common is lacking a version, though. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 30 12:54:30 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 08:54:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208584] Review Request: mirrormagic - Puzzle game where you steer a beam of light using mirrors In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609301254.k8UCsUnf006961@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mirrormagic - Puzzle game where you steer a beam of light using mirrors https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208584 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-09-30 08:54 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > THINGS to do: > * this is not the blocker, but probably SDL-devel BR is unnecessary (I > haven't tested it) You're right, I've removed it. > * the much more important problem is related with running the game on x86_64. > When I'm trying to do it, I get following message: > > $ mirrormagic > mirrormagic: gadget incomplete (missing Bitmap) > mirrormagic: aborting > Ah yes, I created this package on my 32 bit machine, and look and behold its not 64 bit clean. I've managed to fix this. Here is a new version: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/mirrormagic.spec http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/mirrormagic-2.0.2-2.fc6.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 30 14:46:04 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 10:46:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206836] Review Request: TurboJson - Python template plugin that supports json In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609301446.k8UEk4HT010570@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: TurboJson - Python template plugin that supports json https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206836 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|osgal |Package Review -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 30 15:03:57 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 11:03:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206839] Review Request: TurboKid - Python template plugin that supports Kid templates In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609301503.k8UF3veh011107@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: TurboKid - Python template plugin that supports Kid templates https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206839 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|orpie |Package Review OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 30 15:05:50 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 11:05:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206838] Review Request: TGFastData - Automatic user interface generation for TurboGears In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609301505.k8UF5ojo011202@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: TGFastData - Automatic user interface generation for TurboGears https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206838 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|orpie |Package Review -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 30 15:06:09 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 11:06:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206837] Review Request: TurboCheetah - TurboGears plugin to support use of Cheetah templates In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609301506.k8UF69RW011225@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: TurboCheetah - TurboGears plugin to support use of Cheetah templates https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206837 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|orpie |Package Review -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 30 16:24:43 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 12:24:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199108] Review Request: gutenprint: Printer Drivers Package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609301624.k8UGOhaj014074@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gutenprint: Printer Drivers Package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199108 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-09-30 12:24 EST ------- You should not specify the fc6 tag... Just use 'make build' or 'make plague' in your gutenprint/devel directory, it will make the right plague-client call. It should be something like: plague-client build gutenprint gutenprint-5.0.0-0.14 devel -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 30 16:28:21 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 12:28:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207806] Review Request: evolution-bogofilter - A plugin for bogofilter support in evolution In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609301628.k8UGSLco014357@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: evolution-bogofilter - A plugin for bogofilter support in evolution https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207806 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-09-30 12:28 EST ------- Excellent. That looks good and addresses all the blockers I see, so this package is APPROVED. Don't forget to close this bug NEXTRELEASE once the package has been imported and built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 30 16:36:02 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 12:36:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199108] Review Request: gutenprint: Printer Drivers Package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609301636.k8UGa2gp014914@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gutenprint: Printer Drivers Package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199108 ------- Additional Comments From jamatos at fc.up.pt 2006-09-30 12:35 EST ------- (In reply to comment #84) > You should not specify the fc6 tag... ?! That comes from %{?dist} dist tag and it is the right behaviour. I suspect that Parag is missing the make tag. Just for reference after confirming that changes are the one I really want to commit I do this: $ make clog && cvs ci -F clog && make clean && make tag && make build -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 30 16:51:27 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 12:51:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199108] Review Request: gutenprint: Printer Drivers Package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609301651.k8UGpRPS016186@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gutenprint: Printer Drivers Package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199108 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-09-30 12:51 EST ------- In this case looking closer, it looks like the package was tagged incorrectly. Parag: did you use 'make tag' or something else to tag the files? Your best bet is probibly to bump the release up to 15 (and add a changelog that you did so for tagging issues) check in your .spec file with that change, and do 'make tag && make build' -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 30 16:56:56 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 12:56:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205075] Review Request: fwbackups - a user backup program, with support for automated backups and on-demand backups In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609301656.k8UGuuNh016681@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fwbackups - a user backup program, with support for automated backups and on-demand backups https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205075 ------- Additional Comments From s.adam at diffingo.com 2006-09-30 12:56 EST ------- Binary RPM: http://diffingo.com/downloads/fwbackups/fwbackups-1.42.1-2.noarch.rpm SRPM: http://diffingo.com/downloads/fwbackups/fwbackups-1.42.1-2.src.rpm Spec: http://diffingo.com/downloads/fwbackups/fwbackups.spec I've fixed what you mentioned above, and rpmlint's also silent on all of the above. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 30 17:06:45 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 13:06:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206989] Review Request: twinkle - A SIP Soft Phone In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609301706.k8UH6jUc017173@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: twinkle - A SIP Soft Phone https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206989 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-09-30 13:06 EST ------- Thanks very much for the review... Imported and built for devel. FC-5 branch requested, will build that later when the branch appears. 18670 (twinkle): Build on target fedora-development-extras succeeded. Build logs may be found at http://buildsys.fedoraproject.org/logs/fedora- development-extras/18670-twinkle-0.8.1-2.fc6/ Please do more reviews! We need more reviewers. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 30 17:22:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 13:22:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207725] Review Request: sshfp - Generate SSHFP DNS records from knownhosts files or ssh-keyscan In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609301722.k8UHMFO6017613@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sshfp - Generate SSHFP DNS records from knownhosts files or ssh-keyscan https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207725 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-09-30 13:22 EST ------- Sorry for taking so long to respond. The only thing I have to say now is that you need to modify %description to match the current non-ssh_config-modifying behavior of the package. But you can do that when you check it in. Now I just need to figure out how to get my DNS configured to hand out these keys. * source files match upstream: 7bceb2240c34cb5929d931cd248e9e35 sshfp-1.1.0.tar.gz * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * dist tag is present. * build root is correct. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. License text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper (none) * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * package installs properly * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: sshfp = 1.1.0-1.fc6 = /usr/bin/python openssh-clients >= 4 python-dns * %check is not present; no test suite upstream. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 30 17:50:06 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 13:50:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196379] Review Request: kdeartwork-extras: Artwork Extras, including xscreensaver-based screensavers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609301750.k8UHo6TP018530@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdeartwork-extras: Artwork Extras, including xscreensaver-based screensavers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196379 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-09-30 13:50 EST ------- > Does "sourc"ing Qt config files (/etc/profile.d/qt.sh) still needed? Strictly speaking, no, not for mock anyway. otoh, it's presence certainly is not wrong nor does it cause any harm. > Does this package (kdeartwork-extras) really require > xscreensaver related packages? Yes, most of the bundled screensavers actually use xscreensaver as the backend. > It is someting like > "optional", isn't it? Perhaps there are some users > who don't want to install xscreensaver-gl-extras. Without more package splitting, no. The manual work required to make that work properly simply isn't worth it, imo. > - Is xscreensaver-base really required? Yes. %%configure checks for the presence of the xscreensaver bits at buildtime. > * Desktop files corresponding to the following hacks are missing Personally, I'm not interested in adding those by hand. IMO, it's an upstream issue (ie, I'd prefer to let them "fix" it). > * IMO, the hacks in the following package can also be used for > this package. I'll ping upstream about these too. > W: kdeartwork-extras macro-in-%changelog _libdir > W: kdeartwork-extras macro-in-%changelog _libexecdir > Use %% to avoild having macros expanded. Oops, will fix that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 30 18:50:38 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 14:50:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177747] Review Request: glade3 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609301850.k8UIocuX020098@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glade3 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177747 peter at thecodergeek.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |163776 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From peter at thecodergeek.com 2006-09-30 14:50 EST ------- (Adding blocker on FE-NEW.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 30 19:21:17 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 15:21:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205075] Review Request: fwbackups - a user backup program, with support for automated backups and on-demand backups In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609301921.k8UJLHcS021191@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fwbackups - a user backup program, with support for automated backups and on-demand backups https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205075 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778, 177841 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-09-30 15:21 EST ------- The source now matches upstream: bd0a4d63e0729fa3ed89eccb10fee2da fwbackups-1.42.1.tar.gz which is good. It would still be nice if you could elide the commented out "Provides:" bit and the commented "install" calls in the %install section and perhaps fix the indentation, because it's better for specfiles to be neat and free of extraneous cruft. However, I'm not going to block on that; just clean things up when you check in if you could. APPROVED Now you can go ahead and apply for cvsextras and fedorabugs access, and I'll click on the proper buttons. Let me know if you have any questions, or catch me on IRC. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 30 19:29:07 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 15:29:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207725] Review Request: sshfp - Generate SSHFP DNS records from knownhosts files or ssh-keyscan In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609301929.k8UJT7O2021714@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sshfp - Generate SSHFP DNS records from knownhosts files or ssh-keyscan https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207725 ------- Additional Comments From paul at xelerance.com 2006-09-30 15:29 EST ------- Thanks :) Just concatenate the output of sshfp -a -s yourdomain.com to your zone file :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 30 19:30:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 15:30:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207725] Review Request: sshfp - Generate SSHFP DNS records from knownhosts files or ssh-keyscan In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609301930.k8UJU0OA021745@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sshfp - Generate SSHFP DNS records from knownhosts files or ssh-keyscan https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207725 paul at xelerance.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 30 19:40:14 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 15:40:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208009] Review Request: perl-Wx - Interface to the wxWidgets cross-platform GUI toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609301940.k8UJeEeJ022182@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Wx - Interface to the wxWidgets cross-platform GUI toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208009 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-09-30 15:40 EST ------- The build progresses farther but still fails to complete: No such 'link' library: 'adv' at /builddir/build/BUILD/Wx-0.57/build/Wx/build/MakeMaker.pm line 202 Attempt to free unreferenced scalar: SV 0xc90130, Perl interpreter: 0x603010. wxGTK did install, so libwx_gtk2u_adv-2.6 should be there. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 30 19:53:28 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 15:53:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207927] Review Request: supertuxkart - Kids 3D go-kart racing game featuring Tux In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609301953.k8UJrSbm022519@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: supertuxkart - Kids 3D go-kart racing game featuring Tux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207927 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2006-09-30 15:53 EST ------- I haven't imported this yet because more copyright images have been found by others on the supertuxkart-devel mailing list, most of these have been fixed in svn now. Also its unplayable on one of my machines because keypresses get lost. Once both issues are revolved I'll create a new srpm, is it ok to import that one or do you want to take a (quick) look at it first? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 30 20:06:53 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 16:06:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208453] Review Request: php-pear-Console-Getargs - Command-line arguments and parameters parser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609302006.k8UK6ru2022835@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Console-Getargs - Command-line arguments and parameters parser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208453 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 30 20:48:19 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 16:48:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188974] Review Request: mesa-libGLw - Xt / Motif OpenGL widgets In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609302048.k8UKmJSv024140@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mesa-libGLw - Xt / Motif OpenGL widgets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188974 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2006-09-30 16:48 EST ------- It seems to me that there is a lesstif-devel requires for devel package missing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 30 21:09:15 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 17:09:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208453] Review Request: php-pear-Console-Getargs - Command-line arguments and parameters parser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609302109.k8UL9FOF024608@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Console-Getargs - Command-line arguments and parameters parser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208453 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-09-30 17:09 EST ------- I wonder if "pear run-tests -p Console_Getargs" is supposed to do anything. I can't actually get it to do anything for any installed PEAR module (other than "Running 0 tests"). * source files match upstream: 67b5918343fa24f3e311d159e168b5dc Console_Getargs-1.3.1.tgz * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * dist tag is present. * build root is correct. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. License text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * package installs properly * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: php-pear(Console_Getargs) = 1.3.1 php-pear-Console-Getargs = 1.3.1-1.fc6 = /bin/sh /usr/bin/pear php >= 4.1.0 php-pear(PEAR) * %check is not present; not possible to run the tests within rpm. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * scriptlets are OK (pear install) * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 30 21:36:00 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 17:36:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177211] Review Request: newsx - NNTP news exchange utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609302136.k8ULa0gW025236@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: newsx - NNTP news exchange utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177211 jpmahowald at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2006-09-30 17:35 EST ------- rpmlint of newsx: E: newsx non-standard-dir-perm /var/spool/news/inhosts 0770 + source matches upstream + proper use of macros + license (GPL) + good buildroot + %clean section + smp flags + all needed BuildRequires APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 30 22:04:11 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 18:04:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208200] Review Request: toped - IC Layout Editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609302204.k8UM4BoJ026137@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: toped - IC Layout Editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208200 ------- Additional Comments From s_krustev at tiscali.co.uk 2006-09-30 18:04 EST ------- The packet is ready and can be found here http://prdownload.berlios.de/toped/toped-0.8.2.tar.bz2 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 30 22:15:42 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 18:15:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191745] Review Request: sysprof-kmod - kernel module for the sysprof profiler In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609302215.k8UMFgee026362@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sysprof-kmod - kernel module for the sysprof profiler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191745 ------- Additional Comments From giallu at gmail.com 2006-09-30 18:15 EST ------- (In reply to comment #11) > I think kernels above 2.6.16 do not require any smp kernels so either SPEC need > to have some kversion checking or remove smp build lines. Though they are not required, we are still building them at least until 2.6.17-1.2187, which I am happily running at home. I hope there will be an announcement when they become history... > E: sysprof-kmod configure-without-libdir-spec > A configure script is run without specifying the libdir. configure > options must be augmented with something like --libdir=%{_libdir}. > > I am not able to found any ./configure call in SPEC. Why this Error is coming > Gianluca, any idea? it seems rpmlint is not ignoring the comment line which says: # ./configure breaks in mock builds (missing BRs), so we create here and spit that warning... I think I can easily fix it (or maybe just submit a bug report against rpmlint :P ) (In reply to comment #12) > I am not able to find sysprof-kmod-common package. When i tried to install > sysprof-kmod, i got following output. > sysprof-kmod-common is provided by sysprof-common -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 30 22:24:46 2006 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 18:24:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207927] Review Request: supertuxkart - Kids 3D go-kart racing game featuring Tux In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200609302224.k8UMOkWK026594@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: supertuxkart - Kids 3D go-kart racing game featuring Tux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207927 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-09-30 18:24 EST ------- ok. I would be happy to take a quick look at an updated package, or if you prefer you can just check it in. Whichever you prefer. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.