[Bug 193897] Review Request: mysql-connector-java - Official JDBC driver for MySQL

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Thu Sep 7 15:57:05 UTC 2006


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: mysql-connector-java - Official JDBC driver for MySQL


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193897





------- Additional Comments From ifoox at redhat.com  2006-09-07 11:56 EST -------
New files:
http://people.redhat.com/ifoox/extras/mysql-connector-java-3.1.12-1jpp_4fc.i386.rpm

(In reply to comment #12)
> (In reply to comment #11)
> > The package now builds for me in mock, I guess the problem with ant-contrib was
> > some sort of mirror inconsistency.
> 
> Awesome.  This builds in mock and is almost perfect.
> 
> I think there are just two minor changes.
> 
> 1. I gave you bad advice on using "Development/Libraries".  This should be
> "System Environment/Libraries".  Sorry about that!

Fixed

> 2. In the spec file you wrote:
> # ************ NOTE ************
> # The following files have been removed from the tarball since they are
> # distributed under the LGPL and the upstream provider does not distribute
> # any sources with them.
> Not all of these files are LGPL.  I forget which one(s) it was.  Just say
> something like...
> # The following files have been removed from the tarball to avoid licensing 
> # issues.
Fixed. Changed to:
# The following files have been removed from the tarball to avoid licensing
# issues due to the fact that they are not distributed with their source.
 
> Did you find out about the
> Provides: mm.mysql
> Obsoletes: mm.mysql
> ?

See comment #4 (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193897#c4)
above.

I also formatted the preamble section so it doesn't look like a puzzle anymore :-).


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list