[Bug 198613] Review Request: compat-libgda - gnome database access library

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Mon Sep 11 17:20:55 UTC 2006


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: compat-libgda - gnome database access library


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198613


tcallawa at redhat.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |tcallawa at redhat.com
OtherBugsDependingO|163776                      |163779
              nThis|                            |




------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com  2006-09-11 13:20 EST -------
OK, I went to review this one, and found a few really minor issues that I fixed.
If you're ok with the minor changes, this package is approved.

Specifically, I added an xbase conditional (since xbase is in FE), enabled
everything that could be built by default in Fedora, and fixed the libraries so
that they get handled properly by debuginfo. Also, I changed Source0 so it
points to a URL. Last, I fixed the License tags for the provider packages so
that they were GPL (only the core libgda libs are LGPL) and included the LGPL
text in the main package as a %doc.

REVIEW
=======
- rpmlint checks return:
W: compat-libgda-devel no-documentation
W: compat-gda-mysql no-documentation
W: compat-gda-odbc no-documentation
W: compat-gda-postgres no-documentation
W: compat-gda-sqlite no-documentation
W: compat-gda-ldap no-documentation
W: compat-gda-xbase no-documentation

All ok.

- package meets naming guidelines
- package meets packaging guidelines
- license (LGPL) OK, text in %doc, matches source
- spec file legible, in am. english
- source matches upstream
- package compiles on devel (x86)
- no missing BR
- no unnecessary BR
- locales grabbed with find_lang
- not relocatable
- owns all directories that it creates
- no duplicate files
- permissions ok
- %clean ok
- macro use consistent
- code, not content
- no need for -docs
- nothing in %doc affects runtime
- no need for .desktop file
- devel package ok
- no .la files
- post/postun ldconfig ok
- devel requires base package n-v-r 

APPROVED (assuming you use my spec)

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list