[Bug 196591] Review Request: bitlbee

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: bitlbee


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196591





------- Additional Comments From paul at xtdnet.nl  2006-09-11 16:25 EST -------
condrestart still seems the proper way of doing it for xinetd. 

1) don't try to send signals to non-existing processes
2) don't try and start something that isn't running
3) we don't want to return errors in exit codes when failing to signal something
non-existing

Is there any reason why *not* to use condrestart?

Perhaps proftpd and uw-imapd send the signals because they also have a
standalone mode without being run from inetd? 

I did not know about chkconfig not needing the --add command. Sorry about that.

I would still like to see a new package to test. Or if you want to wait on the
proxy testing, that's fine too, but that might take me a day or two to get
around to.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.