[Bug 196669] Review Request: filesystem-i18n

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: filesystem-i18n


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196669





------- Additional Comments From redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de  2006-09-13 13:53 EST -------
1.: Just copied from main filesystem pkg, but 1.0.0 also would fit.
2.: Well...are there really major, minor or micro version upgrades? Adding a
    new language could be used for bumping micro, bumping minor only for bigger  
    changes, e.g. adding new tree or maybe with every Fedora release, e.g. 1.6.x 
    would be FC6. I wouldn't abuse major version for Fedora release, but maybe 
    also another thought, e.g. 6.x.y for FC6.
3.: Agree, +1
4.: No, please don't do that. Not everybody installing the filesystem-i18n 
    package is interested having a empty KDE directory i18n tree, when KDE isn't 
    installed; which is case especially on servers.
    But if I have to accept that KDE i18n will get part of filesystem-i18n, then 
    the i18n directories from %{_mandir} have to be added, too.

When candidate for FE and until it receives FC, I would like to maintain it in 
FE - if possible...

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.