[Bug 206989] Review Request: twinkle - A SIP Soft Phone

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Tue Sep 19 05:23:21 UTC 2006


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: twinkle - A SIP Soft Phone


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206989


panemade at gmail.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |panemade at gmail.com




------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com  2006-09-19 01:23 EST -------
{Not Official Reviewer}
packaging looks ok.
+ Mockbuild is successfull for i386 FC6 with some warnings 
+ rpmlint on binary rpm is silent
+ dist tag is present
+ Buildroot is correct
+ source URL is correct
+ BR is correct
+ License used is GPL
+ License file COPYING is included
+ desktop file is handled correctly
+ MD5 sum on tarball is matching upstream tarball
245ffd3b4a6f968d8f80d42f6aad079c  twinkle-0.8.1.tar.gz
+ No duplicate files

You can use --delete-original with desktop-install-file
Instead of writing
rm -f ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}%{_datadir}/applications/twinkle.desktop
desktop-file-install --vendor fedora                            \
       --dir ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}%{_datadir}/applications         \
        --add-category X-Fedora                                 \
        twinkle.desktop

you can write only in SPEC

desktop-file-install --vendor fedora                            \
        --delete-original --dir ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}%{_datadir}/applications         \
        --add-category X-Fedora                                 \
        twinkle.desktop



Unable to install on FC6 got
error: Failed dependencies:
        libresolv.so.2(GLIBC_PRIVATE) is needed by twinkle-0.8.1-1.fc6.i386



-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list