[Bug 207141] Review Request: farsight - A audio/video conferencing framework

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Sat Sep 23 05:11:13 UTC 2006


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: farsight - A audio/video conferencing framework


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207141


kevin at tummy.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
         AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org    |kevin at tummy.com
OtherBugsDependingO|163776                      |163778
              nThis|                            |




------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com  2006-09-23 01:11 EST -------
OK - Package name
OK - Spec file matches base package name.
OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines.
See below - License (GPL)
See below - License field in spec matches
See below - License file included in package
OK - Spec in American English
OK - Spec is legible.
OK - Sources match upstream md5sum:
68daa710087201064680fd02c8a4951a  farsight-0.1.8.tar.gz
68daa710087201064680fd02c8a4951a  farsight-0.1.8.tar.gz.1
OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch.
OK - BuildRequires correct
OK - Spec has needed ldconfig in post and postun
OK - Package owns all the directories it creates.
OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files.
OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good.
OK - Package has a correct %clean section.
OK - Spec has consistant macro usage.
OK - Package is code or permissible content.
OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime.
OK - Headers/static libs in -devel subpackage.
OK - .pc files in -devel subpackage.
OK - .so files in -devel subpackage.
OK - -devel package Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release}
OK - .la files are removed.
OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own.
OK - No rpmlint output.

SHOULD Items:

See below - Should include License or ask upstream to include it.
OK - Should build in mock.
(fc6 {i386|x86_64})

Issues:

1. Is the License LGPL or GPL? The spec says GPL, but the COPYING file
is the LGPL, and all the source files refer to LGPL.

2. Are all the disables needed? Or could some of them be enabled
if other packages were in extras?
        --disable-sequence-diagrams     \
        --disable-sofia-sip             \
        --disable-gnet                  \
        --disable-msnwebcam             \
        --disable-yahoowebcam           \

3. rpmlint says:
W: farsight-devel no-documentation

which can be ignored.


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list