[Bug 187317] Review Request: mindi

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: mindi


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187317





------- Additional Comments From dennis at ausil.us  2006-09-23 23:38 EST -------
if the fedora busybox is missing something you need then please file bugs 
against busybox. 

as far as ppc goes  i will look at what is  needed in regards to porting to 
ppc.  we have a policy to have all arches except when something is arch 
specific.   we use yaboot for ppc loading.

We have a clear set of guidelines for packaging and reviewing. 

http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines#head-2f03bba0a9f05b2ac0128eb1d70b1e3ce9f9dc40

states - MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on 
an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in 
ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch needs to have a bug filed 
in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not 
compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug number should then be placed 
in a comment, next to the corresponding ExcludeArch line. New packages will 
not have bugzilla entries during the review process, so they should put this 
description in the comment until the package is approved, then file the 
bugzilla entry, and replace the long explanation with the bug number. (Extras 
Only) The bug should be marked as blocking one (or more) of the following bugs 
to simplify tracking such issues: [WWW] FE-ExcludeArch-x86, [WWW] 
FE-ExcludeArch-x64, [WWW] FE-ExcludeArch-ppc 



-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.